Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    Final Model 2 With Random Effects: The Mixed Procedure

    Uploaded by

    Camille Anne Celiz
    The document summarizes the results of a mixed model examining factors that influence exam scores, including verbal reasoning, gender, school intake score, and student band. It found that verbal reasoning level, school gender, average school intake score, and student band were significant predictors of exam score. Several interaction terms, such as between verbal reasoning level and student band, were also significant. Model fit statistics and random effects estimates are also reported.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Final Model 2 With Random Effects: The Mixed Procedure

    Uploaded by

    Camille Anne Celiz
    27 views3 pages
    The document summarizes the results of a mixed model examining factors that influence exam scores, including verbal reasoning, gender, school intake score, and student band. It found that verbal reasoning level, school gender, average school intake score, and student band were significant predictors of exam score. Several interaction terms, such as between verbal reasoning level and student band, were also significant. Model fit statistics and random effects estimates are also reported.

    Original Title

    Final Model.rtf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the results of a mixed model examining factors that influence exam scores, including verbal reasoning, gender, school intake score, and student band. It found that verbal reasoning level, school gender, average school intake score, and student band were significant predictors of exam score. Several interaction terms, such as between verbal reasoning level and student band, were also significant. Model fit statistics and random effects estimates are also reported.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    27 views3 pages

    Final Model 2 With Random Effects: The Mixed Procedure

    Uploaded by

    Camille Anne Celiz
    The document summarizes the results of a mixed model examining factors that influence exam scores, including verbal reasoning, gender, school intake score, and student band. It found that verbal reasoning level, school gender, average school intake score, and student band were significant predictors of exam score. Several interaction terms, such as between verbal reasoning level and student band, were also significant. Model fit statistics and random effects estimates are also reported.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Final Model 2 with Random Effects

    The Mixed Procedure

    Saturday, May 13, 2017 07:42:35 PM  1
    Model Information

    Data Set WORK.PAPER

    Dependent Variable exam_score

    Covariance Structure Unstructured

    Subject Effect sch_id

    Estimation Method REML

    Residual Variance Method Profile

    Fixed Effects SE Method Model­Based

    Degrees of Freedom Method Satterthwaite

    Dimensions

    Covariance Parameters 4

    Columns in X 15

    Columns in Z per Subject 2

    Subjects 65

    Max Obs per Subject 198

    Number of Observations

    Number of Observations Read 4059

    Number of Observations Used 4059

    Number of Observations Not Used 0

    Iteration History

    Iteration Evaluations ­2 Res Log Like Criterion

    0 1 9430.65736792

    1 2 9109.06318045 0.00004472

    2 1 9109.02416680 0.00000023

    3 1 9109.02397178 0.00000000
    Final Model 2 with Random Effects

    The Mixed Procedure

    Saturday, May 13, 2017 07:42:35 PM  2

    Convergence criteria met.

    Covariance Parameter Estimates

    Standard Z
    Cov Parm Subject Estimate Error Value Pr Z

    UN(1,1) sch_id 0.06737 0.01482 4.55 <.0001

    UN(2,1) sch_id 0.01385 0.006045 2.29 0.0220

    UN(2,2) sch_id 0.01262 0.004303 2.93 0.0017

    Residual 0.5238 0.01183 44.28 <.0001

    Fit Statistics

    ­2 Res Log Likelihood 9109.0

    AIC (Smaller is Better) 9117.0

    AICC (Smaller is Better) 9117.0

    BIC (Smaller is Better) 9125.7

    Null Model Likelihood Ratio
    Test

    DF Chi­Square Pr > ChiSq
    3 321.63 <.0001

    Information Criteria

    Neg2LogLike Parms AIC AICC HQIC BIC CAIC


    9109.0 4 9117.0 9117.0 9120.5 9125.7 9129.7

    Solution for Fixed Effects
    Final Model 2 with Random Effects

    The Mixed Procedure

    Saturday, May 13, 2017 07:42:35 PM  3
    student  band of 
    t Value Pr > |t|
    level  studenrs
    verbal  school  intake  Standard
    Effect reasoning gender score Estimate Error DF

    Intercept ­0.3594 0.1238 69.1 ­2.90 0.0050

    lrt 0.4646 0.03857 67.2 12.05 <.0001

    vr 1 0.2083 0.2453 57.8 0.85 0.3993

    vr 2 0.09427 0.1356 57.3 0.70 0.4898

    vr 3 0 . . . .

    lrt*vr 1 ­0.1751 0.05717 59.8 ­3.06 0.0033

    lrt*vr 2 ­0.09130 0.04507 53.9 ­2.03 0.0478

    lrt*vr 3 0 . . . .

    sch_gen 1 ­0.2688 0.07502 51.7 ­3.58 0.0008

    sch_gen 2 ­0.1520 0.1037 53.6 ­1.47 0.1483

    sch_gen 3 0 . . . .

    ave 0.5402 0.2472 56.5 2.19 0.0330

    band 1 0.7746 0.05348 4008 14.48 <.0001

    band 2 0.3697 0.04079 3984 9.06 <.0001

    band 3 0 . . . .

    Type 3 Tests of Fixed Effects

    Num Den
    Effect DF DF F Value Pr > F

    lrt 1 95.1 251.06 <.0001

    vr 2 57.1 0.36 0.6977

    lrt*vr 2 56.3 4.80 0.0119

    sch_gen 2 53.1 6.45 0.0031

    ave 1 56.5 4.78 0.0330

    band 2 4004 114.17 <.0001

    You might also like