Recovery of Bitumen From Oil or Tar Sands Using Ionic Liquids
Recovery of Bitumen From Oil or Tar Sands Using Ionic Liquids
Recovery of Bitumen From Oil or Tar Sands Using Ionic Liquids
1021/ef9009586
Published on Web 10/07/2009
The extraction and separation of bitumen from oil sands for the purpose of processing fuels is relatively
expensive and poses several environmental challenges. Roughly two tons of oil sands are required to produce
a barrel of oil, and the separation of the bitumen from sand and clay requires significant amounts of energy
and the use of large quantities of water. It is shown here that bitumen in a sample of Canadian tar sands can be
recovered using ionic liquids (ILs) and organic solvents. Essentially, a multiphase system;consisting of a
sand and clay slurry, an ionic liquid layer, and an organic layer containing the bitumen;can be formed by
simply mixing the components at somewhat elevated (∼55 °C) or ambient temperatures (∼25 °C). Essentially
all of the bitumen is released from the sand. Water is not used in this stage of the separation, but relatively
small amounts are used to separate entrained IL from the sand and clays. Because both the IL and water can
be recycled through the system and used repeatedly, this process has the potential for ameliorating many of
the environmental problems associated with current extraction methods.
proportions can be used, but these were the most useful for Table 1. Yields of Bitumen Obtained by Extraction of Oil Sands
visualizing phase separation. The cleanest separation between Using Recycled Ionic Liquid
the phases was given by [bmmim][BF4] and this is shown in
extraction number extraction yield
Figure 3. This particular separation was obtained by simply
stirring the components at room temperature, about 25 °C. 1 13.5%
2 12.7%
The bottom layer consists of sand and clays suspended in the
3 14.5%
IL, the middle layer contains the ionic liquid with a small 4 15.1%
amount of dissolved or suspended bitumen particles and some 5 13.4%
mineral fines, and the top layer is a toluene/bitumen mixture.
This was easily removed from the other layers using a pipet. assumed there would be some variation in the bitumen
Upon evaporation of the toluene from this mixture, we noticed content of such small samples.
some residual ionic liquid in the bottom of the vial, beneath an We now address the questions concerning the presence of
oil/bitumen layer, presumably because we had entrained some any mineral fines in the bitumen extracts and the degree to
IL in our crude laboratory separation. We added a small which the IL can be separated from the residual minerals. In
amount of fresh toluene to the vial, swirled it around, let the the simple experiments described here, the bitumen/toluene
mixture settle, and then decanted the toluene/bitumen phase. layer was simply removed from the phase-separated mixture
The ionic liquid stayed in the bottom of the vial due to its high using a pipet. Any small amounts of entrained IL were easily
viscosity-it did not move when we poured the toluene/ separated by a second treatment of the bitumen with toluene,
bitumen mixture into a new vial, giving us a clean separation. as described above. The IL middle layer and the IL/mineral
In our initial experiments, involving separation at about slurry at the bottom of the tube were also separated by pipet
55 °C, we obtained bitumen yields of 12.6% in our first and each was poured into cold (i.e., room temperature) water,
extraction and 14.7% in a repeat experiment. Shaking a vial the insoluble residues washed with a second batch of water
containing the oil sand, IL, and toluene at room temperature and then dried under vacuum. The IL layer contained small
gave a yield of 7.5% after 10 min. Stirring at room temperature amounts (∼0.4% by weight of the original oil sand sample) of
for 2 h gave a yield of 12.7%. This bitumen appears to be free of predominantly minerals. However, there were no mineral
mineral fines, as we will show below. Toluene extractions of the fines in the toluene/bitumen layer that could be detected using
tar sand gave yields of 14.3 and 14.5%, although the extracts infrared spectroscopy. This is shown in Figure 4, which
also contained some clay fines, as we will also show below. compares infrared spectra (in the 2000-500 cm-1 region) of
ILs are expensive materials and as such will need to be the original tar sands sample. The bitumen obtained after
reused numerous times in any viable process. Accordingly, we evaporation of the toluene and the sand/clay layer after the
also conducted a set of experiments where we reused the ionic liquid was removed using cold water. These samples
middle IL layer (see Figure 3) five times. IL is also part of were from a 55 °C extraction.
the slurry at the bottom of the vial and can readily be Bands due to methylene and methyl groups near 1450 and
separated from the sand using water. However, in these initial, 1370 cm-1 are prominent in the spectrum of the bitumen and
fairly crude experiments we simply made up the missing IL appear with very weak intensity in the spectrum of the tar
with fresh liquid to restore the initial 1:2:3 proportions by sand. They can be more clearly seen in scale-expanded plots
weight of tar sand, toluene, and IL. The yield of bitumen (not shown), but the mineral bands (predominantly quartz
obtained in each extraction (at 55 °C) is listed in Table 1 and and clay) near 1100, 800, and 500 cm-1 absorb very strongly in
varies between 12.7 and 15.1%. This variation is not surpris- the infrared and tend to mask bands due to organic groups.
ing given the crude nature of these experiments and the fact However, these hydrocarbon absorption modes are essen-
that we were using only 1 g of tar sand in each experiment. We tially undetectable in the spectrum of the sand/clay mixture
1096
Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 1094–1098 : DOI:10.1021/ef9009586 Painter et al.
about 1.6 and 8.3 for the materials studied by Toma et al.15 recycled through the system a large number of times. The ILs
Accordingly, we found that [bmim][CF3SO3], estimated to used here apparently can be, because extraction conditions are
have a pH of about 2.6 in aqueous solutions, did not separate very mild and unlikely to lead to degradation. Also, the
bitumen from sand and clay in the absence of an organic products appear to be cleanly separable with no contamina-
solvent such as toluene. Furthermore, the H2 hydrogen of the tion of the bitumen and residual minerals, either with each
imidazolium cation is weakly acidic, with pKa values of the other or with IL, at least in terms of the limits of detection of
order of 21-23.16 Accordingly, we found that a methyl infrared spectroscopy. The bitumen/solvent mixture that
substituted IL gave the best results in terms of separation of forms on the surface can be separated by decantation and
the ILs we have studied so far. More work clearly remains to any entrained IL removed in a further processing step. The IL
be done to elucidate the mechanism of separation, modes of phase appears to contain a small amount of bitumen and some
interaction and the phase behavior of these mixtures. mineral fines, but these can be simply recycled through the
Although ILs have often been called “green solvents”, this system, as the amount of bitumen would be expected to reach
appears to be largely a reflection of their extremely low vapor equilibrium and not accumulate. In experiments performed so
pressure and imidazolium ILs, particularly those with halogen- far we have reused the middle layer five times in successive
containing anions, are toxic to many forms of aquatic life.17 extractions with no decrease in yield. The sand/clay layer has
Although biodegradable ILs have now been synthesized,18 the entrained IL, but this can be removed by using relatively small
ILs used in this study would have to be cleanly removed from amounts of water. Because the IL has essentially zero vapor
the minerals and recycled through a closed system for a pressure, water is readily distilled from the IL and both can
process to be acceptable. The preliminary results presented then be recycled. A schematic diagram illustrating one possi-
here indicate that this is feasible. ble process is shown in Figure 7.
Another major barrier to a commercial process is economic.
At the present time, ILs are very expensive materials. Even Conclusions
though they are now being widely used in a large number of
Bitumen can be separated from oil or tar sands using an
research projects, getting even ballpark figures for the cost of
ionic liquid. This separation is enhanced by the presence of a
large quantities of ILs is not straightforward, as Plechkova
nonpolar solvent such as toluene. To a first approximation,
and Seddon recently pointed out in a comprehensive review of
given the simple nature of the experiments reported here, it
the use of ILs in the chemical industry.11 However, these
appears that yields in excess of 90% are obtained. Additional
authors estimated that in general ionic liquids are about 5-10
work is required to provide a precise figure. No water at all is
times more expensive than conventional solvents (depending
used in this stage of the separation. Water is used to remove IL
on the specific IL), so that 10-20 recycles would give the same
from the residual sand and clays, but this is easily removed
cost, while a larger number of recycles would make them
from the IL by distillation, because the latter has a; negligible
cheaper. Accordingly, even at today’s prices an economically
vapor pressure under these conditions. There was no detect-
viable industrial scale process would be feasible if the IL can be
able IL contamination of the residual sand and clays and the
(15) Toma, S.; Meciarova, M.; Sebesta, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 3,
bitumen produced in this process was free of both clay fines
321–327. and residual IL, in terms of the detection limits of the
(16) Amyes, T. L.; Diver, S. T.; Richard, J. P.; Rivas, F. M.; Toth, K. analytical technique used here, infrared spectroscopy.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4366–4374.
(17) Latala, A.; Nedzi, M.; Stepnowski, P. Green Chem. 2009, 11,
1371–1376. Acknowledgment. The authors gratefully acknowledge the
(18) Harjani, J. R.; Farrel, J.; Garcia, M. T.; Singer, R. D.; Scammells, support of the National Science Foundation, Polymers Program,
P. J. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 821–829. under grant DMR-0901180 and DMR-0851897.
1098