36 - The Disease Evolution Table (DET)
36 - The Disease Evolution Table (DET)
36 - The Disease Evolution Table (DET)
PRACTICE
Homotoxicology is a living science, and therefore will adapt itself as new knowledge become available. However, being
a universal truth, the modern science should in fact only confirm the original idea, and call for an update on termi-
nology. In this first part of a series of articles, we will deal with the history and the newer concepts of regulation.
Since the original development of the Disease Evolution Table (formerly called the Six-Phase Table) by
Dr. Hans-Heinrich Reckeweg in the 1950’s, new insights from modern medicine have been integrated into this
revised table. Not only the name of the “Six-Phase Table of Homotoxicosis” has been changed to “Disease
Evolution Table”, but also the classification of groups of phases and even tissues have been updated and
renamed. Last but not least, more modern examples of diseases in medicine were added to assist the practition-
er with the classification of these diseases. The biological division has been renamed to the regulation/
compensation division, to indicate the point where the regulation has to be supported and manipulated by the
practitioner to induce self-regulation again (see below).
Reckeweg's conception of Homotoxicology challenged the static and individual paradigm of every pathological
Spring 2007
process, and took it forward to a new and more dynamic vision that allowed for not only an explanation of the
changes of phases but also correlating them with the origins of the tissues and organs involved. Thus, it became
Journal of Biomedical Therapy
possible to appreciate the fact that disease development and/or progression, during an individual's lifetime, are
nothing more than the continual unfolding and reactions of natural biological processes - whether progressive or
regressive - indicating either a deterioration of a disease state or the recovery of health ("restitutio ad integrum").
This endowed Homotoxicology with such a fundamentally radical importance that it has been the mainspring of
its development and the growing interest on the part of numerous members of the various medical professions
practically in every country throughout the world.
PRACTICE
In Your
The original idea dates back to a German-American physician, Dr. Constantine Hering (1800-1880), who during
his work at Leipzig University in Germany, was called upon to present some research that would help discredit the
science of homeopathy, then in its infancy. Hering set about studying and observing the practice of homeopathy for
several years and, on seeing the surprising results obtained with homeopathic treatments in inflammatory and infec-
tious processes, gave up his post at the University and devoted himself to investigating and practicing homeopathy.
Hering's laws have been clearly defined and not only can they be further validated with the aid of homotoxicological
principles, but even confirmed on a daily practical basis through patients' clinical histories. They embrace the
following aspects:
We know now that toxins can disturb a number of functions in the organism, but as knowledge of processes on a
cellular level emerges, we realize that we need to update our terminology. Regulation in the body is an intricate
process, and every living cell is not only in communication with its neighbors, but also with the surrounding matrix
and through, this with all the cells in the body. This well-known fact in biological medicine is now also seen in
conventional medicine, and it is becoming known that if the cell-to-cell or cell-to-matrix communication is lost,
this results in disease such as autoimmunity and dedifferentiation. The matrices which facilitate this information
transfer and regulation are not confined to the extracellular matrix, but to a continuum between the extracellular,
intracellular and the intranuclear matrix. Disturbance on any level will be thus communicated to all these struc-
tures at once, but it will depend on the ability of the regulatory phenomena of the various levels to determine to
what extent this disturbance will affect the structure. Some authors, like James L. Oschman, physicist and biolo-
gist, call this continuum the “living matrix”. We thus see that the postulation that diseases moving through the
humeral, matrix and lastly cellular phase, reflect the ability of the organism to regulate in the face of a toxin, or dis-
turbance, and does not necessarily refer to the location of the disturbance in that structure.
For instance, toxins in the extracellular matrix can disrupt the intracellular matrix and even the intranuclear matrix,
so that disease can develop even if the toxin is not directly in that location. For this reason, the biological division is
15
really a division between the ability of the patient
to regulate, and where compensation is the only
way the organism can respond without help from
biological medicine. If regulation is thus not
possible over the various matrices, we see a disease
progression (older term vicariation) and if the
regulation is possible or induced by medication,
we see a disease regression. This division thus
plays a crucial role in the development of treat-
ment strategies. Subsequent articles will deal with
the horizontal and vertical axes, and the use of the
table as a tool to plan therapy and follow progress
of the patient.
Spring 2007
REFERENCES
1.Oschman J., 2000. Energy Medicine: the scientific basis,
Harcourt Brace/Churchill, Livingstone, Edinburgh.
Journal of Biomedical Therapy