Contamination Control in Cleanrooms - Texwipe
Contamination Control in Cleanrooms - Texwipe
Contamination Control in Cleanrooms - Texwipe
CONTROL IN
CLEANROOMS
Shao-Min
Shao Min Yuan, Ph.D.
August 29, 2016
► Cleaning
Cl i
► Cleaning activities
Wiping
Mopping
Swabbing
► Cross-contamination of drug
g either by:
y
by residues
es dues from
o the
e ccleaning
ea g age
agents
s used
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html
(a)
( ) Equipment
q p and utensils shall be cleaned, maintained, and sanitized
and/or sterilized at appropriate intervals to prevent malfunctions or
contamination that would alter the safety, identity, strength, quality, or
purity of the drug product beyond the official or other established
requirements.
requirements
CLEANING
► Protect
P t t ththe product,
d t the
th process, and
d people
l
Critical because the product is not processed further in its immediate container
and is vulnerable to contamination
Airborne particles are significant because they can enter a product and
contaminate it physically, or, act as a vehicle for microorganisms and
contaminate it biologically
Worksurfaces
Cleanroom
► Custodial staff
“Nobody wakes up in the morning excited about the prospect of cleaning surfaces at work”
Contamination
Volatile
V l til Airborne
Organic Molecular
Contaminants Contaminants
Nonvolatile
Residue Microorganisms Particles
Adsorbed Ions
Molecules Metals
Fibers
Contaminants
Saliva
• Talking: projects droplets 2 – 3 feet
• Coughing: projects droplets 4 – 6 feet
• Sneezing: projects droplets 10 – 15 feet @ 200 mph
Good Practices
► Gowning
Gown
G properly--
l garments
t fit,
fit snapped,
d tucked,
t k d masks,
k bouffant,
b ff t booties,
b ti etc.
t
• Check yourself in the mirror before entry
• Check co-workers
co workers
Do not touch your face or goggles and do not blow your nose in a controlled
area – go into gowning room.
FDA was concerned that the cleaning procedures and the line clearance
inspections were not able to detect that the affected equipment was missing
some of its parts.
► Capillary
C ill adhesion
dh i force
f
Attraction between unlike molecules
• Example: Water lifting in a straw
► Electrostatic forces
Ionic interactions – opposite charges attract
• Example: Particles on TV screen, balloon on hair
How Particles Are Removed
► Wiping
Physical action
Use of a liquid decreases or removes the capillary adhesion force
Surfactant – decreases capillary adhesion by reducing surface
tension
Ionic surfactants modify surface and contaminant potentials and
reduce adhesion forces
► Wipers
Example surfaces to clean – small surfaces
• Worksurfaces
• Process equipment
• Associated equipment: carts and carousels
► Mops
Example surfaces to clean – large surfaces
• Floors, walls, ceiling
► Swabs
Example surfaces to clean – small surfaces
• Hard-to-reach (holes, slots)
• Irregular
► Frequency
q y
According to process SOPs or WIs
Common Substrates
polyester – cotton
– cellulose
nylon
rayon
►Man-made
►Man made materials ►Blends
– foam
(combination of fibers)
– polypropylene – polyester/cellulose
►Composites
(sandwich of materials)
– polypropylene/cellulose
p yp py
Common Textures
►Knitted
►Hydroentangled
►Woven
►Composite
Man-Made: Continuous Filament Yarns
►Short fibers
►Natural
– cotton
– cellulose
►Range of textures
– knitted
– hydroentangled
– woven
►Many particles and releasable
fibers
►Typically higher ion levels
Woven Nonwoven
Wiper Edge Treatments
Sealed Border
Substrate Summary
Materials
– man-made
– natural fibers
– combinations
Texture
– knitted
– woven
– nonwoven
Edges
– cold-cut
– laser-cut
– sealed border
WIPING
Microdenier (100% polyester only) and polyester wipes work well with quats,
peroxides, bleach and IPA
When the surface has visible soil, the soil must be removed before any
disinfectant use.
Over-wet
Over wet wiping is required for disinfecting to leave surfaces wet for the
recommended contact time
Damp wiping
► Solubilizes contaminants
from surface
► Transports contaminants
into the wiper capillaries as
a suspension in the cleaning
solvent
► Keeps dry contaminants
from being dispersed into
immediate environment
Over-wet wiping
► Negatives
Redisperses contaminants
Increases the chance of the
cleaning solvent acting as a
contamination source
► Positives
Useful when soaking hardened
deposits
Needed for disinfection
► For the most efficient wiper use, quarter-fold the wiper by first
folding the wipe in half, and then in half again.
► Consistently
C i t tl move left-to-right
l ft t i ht or
1 2 3 4 right-to-left. Do not mix directions.
If diluting a concentrate, be sure to follow the label use instructions and the site
cleaning and disinfecting protocols
MOPPING
► Floors
Fl are typically
t i ll classified
l ifi d as “hi
“high
h ttraffic”
ffi ” and
d are lik
likely
l tto b
be
considered soiled, requiring a pre-cleaning step before disinfection.
► A pre-cleaning
l i ((rinse)
i ) step
t isi required
i d when
h changing
h i ththe ttype off
disinfectant in a rotation
► The pre-cleaning
pre cleaning step is not required when a one
one-step
step disinfectant
is used (for example, TexQ disinfectant), unless visible soil is
present.
► Use a cleaning solution for a pre-clean step. Some disinfectants like
TX6466 allow the use of the product for pre-cleaning, too, as
indicated on the product label.
► Two-bucket system
Make the disinfecting solution in Bucket 1.
Fill Bucket 2 with the same solution (to avoid the dilution of the disinfectant in Bucket 1)
1).
Be sure to follow SOP.
► Three-bucket system
Make the disinfecting solution in Bucket 11.
Fill Bucket 2 with the same solution (to avoid the dilution of the disinfectant in
Bucket 1). Be sure to follow SOP.
Leave Bucket 3 empty as it is used as the wring bucket to collect the dirty
solution. Refer to the disinfectant product label for correct solution preparation.
► Water should meet the quality of the water used in the
cleanroom
Sterile water for sterile cleanroom or work area
► More is not better… Adding extra concentrate leaves more
residue that requires removal later
later.
Step 4 – Perform the Cleaning or Disinfectant Application Steps
A D B, E
► Single bucket system
Wringer
Not recommended; however, it used
Mopping Technique – 1
► Feels
F l more “natural”
“ t l”
About 4’ across
Stroke 2
Flip
Stroke 3
Remember overlapping
strokes!
Mopping Guide
Wiping and Mopping Protocol References
STERILIZATION &
DISINFECTANTS
滅菌 無菌
滅菌=無菌?
Why Disinfect?
► Bacteria
0.5-5 µm length
Quickly replicate
► Viruses
20-300 nm diameter
Replicate inside living cells
► Fungi
2-10 µm diameter
Yeasts and molds
► Spores
Most difficult to kill
Require special claims - sporicide
Classes of Disinfectant
► Sanitizer
Low
L performance
f disinfectant
di i f t t
► Disinfectant
Higher performance in kill claims
► Sporicide (Sterilant)
Highest
g p
performance in kill claims
► If do
d nott test,
t t dod nott know
k
What microbes
Concentration of disinfectant
► USP <1072> is the most important information guide that the FDA would
point to for compliance
Stronger
disinfectants
FDA enforces that end users must perform disinfectant efficacy studies on microbes
found in their production areas
FDA requires end users to validate the use of the disinfectants in their local
production environment because their bugs may be different or unique, and
certainly more relevant and prevalent in their cleanroom
EPA-registered kill claims provide end users with assurance that the selected
di i f t t will
disinfectant ill kill th
the prescribed
ib d b
bugs
They also provide assurance that they may kill related or similar bugs found in their
environment,, compared
p to a product
p that has no EPA kill claims at all
Kill claim testing and validation can be laborious and expensive, so end users typically
like to have the assurance that comes with EPA registered claims
Classes of Disinfectants
Sporicides
Bleach
Phenolics
Quaternary
Ammonium
Alcohol –
70% IPA
Cleanroom Swabs
► Particulate burden
Flip swab
Fli b over
Change direction 90°
► Apply
A l pressure tto snap th
the swab
b
► Swab head falls into the vial
Analytical Methods
► Specific
HPLC – UV-Vis,
UV Vi MS or CLND
LAL
ELISA
► Non-Specific
TOC
pH
Conductivity
Sampling – HPLC/UV-Vis or TOC
HPLC
HP C TOC
A
Amount off each
h substance
b ppb
b ((parts per billion)
billi )
HPLC/UV-Vis
► Positives
Good sensitivity to functional groups in drug actives
Good specificity
Good for APIs
Technology well-established
► Negatives
Can be expensive
Prone
P to
t interferences
i t f
Requires functional group for response – does not detect detergent residues
TOC
► Positives
Simple to measure
Minimal method development
Relatively inexpensive
Detects detergent residues which lack functional groups
► Negatives
Non-specific – cannot provide characterization as to the type of residue detected
Any organic carbon source is an interference
Must have back-up selective method if validation fails
Swabbing Guide
Cleaning Validation Articles
"Total Organic Carbon Analysis of Swab Samples for the Cleaning Validation of
Bioprocess Fermentation Equipment", Strege (Lilly) et al., BioPharm, April 1996, p
42.
Used wetted polyester swabs for sampling.
Mean recoveryy of 82% for E. coli cells for samples
p spiked
p at 64 µg
µg/swab.
Cleaning Validation:
“I have found nothing and that’s good news.”
http://www.texwipe.com/files/pdfs/published_papers/search_for_nothing.pdf
Swab is not just a swab
Cleaning Validation:
Why the swab matters
http://www.texwipe.com/files/pdfs/published_papers/swabs_matter_in_cv.pdf
Quiz Questions
4. What are the three main selection criteria when choosing a wiper?
A. Material, Texture, Edge treatment
B. Material, Size, Texture
C. Texture, Edge treatment, Size