156 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

Dates of Katharina von Bora's Life

1499 January 29: Birth in Lippendorf.

1505 Admission into the Brehna Cloister.
1509 Admission into the Marienthron Cloister in Nimbschen near
Grimma.
1514 Beginning of her novitiate.
1515 October 8: Consecration as a nun.
1523 April 6/7: Flight from the Nimbschen Cloister with eleven other
nuns with the aid of the merchant, Leonard Koppe, from Torgau.
Nine nuns come through Torgau to Wittenberg.
1525 June 13: Marriage to Martin Luther in the Black Cloister
in Wittenberg.
June 27: Public church-going and wedding feast in Wittenberg.
1526 June 7: Birth of her son, Johannes.
1527 December 10: Birth of her daughter, Elisabeth. fi528
1529 May 4: Birth of her daughter, Magdalena. f J 5 4 2
15 31 November 9: Birth of Martin Luther, Jr.
1533 July 29: Birth of her son, Paul.
1534 December 17: Birth of her daughter, Margarethe.
1535 Re-building at the Black Cloister and acquisition of landed
to property, the Zülsdorf estate, among others, in order to give house
1544 and family an economic base.
1546 Death of her husband, Martin Luther.
1546 Flight of Katharina von Bora before the Schmalkaldic War to
Dessau and Magdeburg.
1547 Renewed flight to Magdeburg and Braunschweig.
1552 Flight from the plague in Wittenberg.
December 20: Death of Katharina von Bora in Torgau.
December 21: Funeral in the city church of St. Marien in Torgau.

From the tour brochure, Wittenberg-Information, Schloßplatz 2, 06886

Lutherstadt Wittenberg
 Katharina von Bora, the Woman at Luther's Side
by M A R T I N T R E U

of Katharina von Bora could hardly be writ-

A REAL BIOGRAPHY
ten even in the future. The base of sources is too small. Her
eight extant letters, none of them in her own hand, 1 are all con-
cerned with economic projects. Her letters to Luther are entirely
lost, which could be a significant reflection on the lack of interest
in her personal effects. Furthermore, her daughter took some of
the family papers with her to East Prussia, where they were de-
stroyed in early 1945. Only one letter, to her sister-in-law Christina
von Bora, from April 25, 1546, seems to open for us a direct
glimpse into her heart:

I see that you have a heartfelt sympathy for me and my poor children. For who
should not properly be sad and worried on account of such a dear man as was
my beloved husband. . . . I can neither eat nor drink. And in addition to that,
I cannot sleep. And if I had a principality or an empire I wouldn't feel so bad
about losing it as I feel now that our dear Lord God has taken this beloved and
dear man from me and not only from me, but from the whole world. When I
think about it, I can't refrain from grief and crying either to read or to write, as
God well knows. 2

The impression of this letter alone is deceiving. Even if the sin-

cerity of Katharina's feelings should not be called into question,
nevertheless the second part of this letter shows that she used them
strategically in refusing Christina s wish for a scholarship for her
son Florian, since Katharina herself has no money.
So we remain dependent above all on Luther's letters to Ka-
tharina as a source for her life. Twenty-one of them are preserved,
and it can be deduced that there were at least fifteen more, now
lost. Apart from the problem of the one-sided "exchange," a chro-
nological survey makes it clear that surviving letters of significance
have been preserved only from Luther's stay at the Coburg in 1530
and his last trip to Eisleben in 1546. Melanchthon's correspondence
is added to this, but it also shows gaps, as does the recording of the

157

LUTHERAN QUARTERLY Volume XIII (1999)

158 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

table talks, in which the note-takers show clear resentments against

Katharina.

Childhood and Youth (1499-1523)

The darkness of history weighs over the early years of Katharina

von Bora. Erasmus of Rotterdam recorded her birth year as 1499
in a commentary on Luther's wedding ceremony, connected with
the demonstrably false claim that she was already pregnant at the
wedding. This at least raises doubts about the reliability of Erasmus'
information. Her date of birth, the 29th of January, goes back to
a note from the year 1733, according to which a (now lost) medal
in the possession of Katharina bore this date.3 The place of birth
ultimately depends on the genealogy of the von Boras, still not
adequately clear. If one follows the tradition, she was born at the
Lippendorf estate, south of Leipzig, as the daughter of Hans von
Bora and his wife, Katharina, née von Haugwitz. 4 Besides her,
there were three brothers and at least one sister in the family. Ka-
tharina's mother died before 1505, since her father remarried at
this time. By then, though, the little girl found herself already in
the Augustinian cloister of Brehna, at least according to a short
note in a letter from Lorenz Zoch to Luther in October 1531.5
It can be deduced that her father, following the example of many
of the nobility of his time, had decided on the path of the cloister
for his daughter. This was considered religiously legitimate and
economically advantageous because the daughter was thus elimi-
nated from the succession of the family inheritance. Hans von Bora
paid only thirty Groschen for her entrance into the cloister, which
indicates either miserliness or else an extremely hard-pressed fi-
nancial situation. If we take into account the fact that the von Boras
had to sell their heavily mortgaged property in 1520, the latter
conjecture seems to be correct.
In any case, in 1508/1509 Katharina entered the Cistercian clois-
ter of Marienthron in Nimbschen near Grimma and was conse-
crated at the earliest possible time, 1514. The list of the nuns who
were there reads like a catalogue of the surplus daughters of the
minor nobility of Saxony. The abbess was very probably her aunt
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 159

on her mother's side; her best friend, later the famous "Auntie
Lena," was an aunt on her father's side.6
Marienthron was rich in spiritual and worldly possessions.7 The
cloister church contained twelve altars with 367 relics, which of-
fered those who venerated them many indulgences. The agricul-
tural land belonging to the cloister enclosed many landed
properties, which, among other things, allowed for intensive
sheep-raising at two outlying farms. The operation was maintained
by more than forty employees, in addition to the labor of the
farmers from the surrounding villages. This permitted a general
self-sufficiency in agricultural matters.
Even though the young nun Katharina certainly did not work
in the fields, nevertheless in these surroundings she experienced
her first lesson in the management of a large-scale agricultural en-
terprise, which may have been helpful to her later on. The strictly
regulated daily routine of the nuns accustomed her to punctuality
and order. She received instruction in reading, writing, singing,
and Latin, which constituted a privilege in comparison with her
contemporaries outside the cloister, since life on an estate differed
only slightly from the life of a prosperous farmer. Common to both
was the fact that such families placed no value on education, es-
pecially not for their daughters.8
So it is significant, then, that there are no negative comments
from Katharina about her time in the cloister, even though later,
amid Luther's circle at table, the guests certainly would have liked
to hear them. The contrasting case of Florentina of Oberweimar,
whose report of fleeing the cloister Luther had published in 1524
with a polemical foreword, proves that women at the beginning of
the Reformation could be deeply unhappy in the cloister.9 One
cannot deduce from the sources whether Katharina played a driv-
ing role in her group's flight from the cloister. Likewise, it is not
clear in what way Luther's reforming message penetrated into their
convent. It is conceivable that such contact could have been made
by means of Wolfgang von Zeschau, the prior of the Augustinian
cloister near Grimma, whom Luther visited in 1516 as vicar of the
district and who had resigned from the order in 1522 but remained
in the city as master of the hospital. Von Zeschau had two sisters
160 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

at Marienthron who later were also among the refugees. Another

conceivable connection is Leonhard Koppe, city councillor in Tor-
gau, who as a merchant regularly supplied the cloister with prod-
ucts that they could not produce there by themselves. It was Koppe
who organized the flight of the nuns.10 It is also striking that an
edition of Luther's The Estate of Marriage is among the few printings
that Wolfgang Stöckel produced in Grimma right at the end of
1522. This essay represents Luther's most radical and popular criti-
cism of the celibate life. It is highly unusual that Stöckel, deviating
from the normal quarto format, executed the printing in a small
octavo format, as if he intended it precisely for the purpose of being
smuggled into a convent.11
Even if its background remains in darkness, we are well informed
about the flight itself, thanks to Luther's detailed report, "Why
Nuns May, in All Godliness, Leave the Convents: Ground and
Reply."12 Thus, on the night of Easter in 1523 (the 6th to the 7th
of April), twelve nuns boarded Leonhard Koppe's covered wagon
and traveled by way of Torgau to Wittenberg, where they arrived
on the 8th of April. About the flight itself Luther recounts hardly
any details, so that chronicles gifted with imagination later con-
cluded from Koppe's work as a merchant that the nuns were driven
out of the cloister hidden behind barrels of herring. Fish as a food
for Lent was part of the usual goods of Koppe's trade. Three of the
escaped nuns were taken in by their families and thus played no
further role in Luther's account. The others, however, had to be
accommodated in Wittenberg, which at that time could only mean
marriage. For most of them this also was soon arranged. The almost
fifty-year-old Margarethe von Staupitz, a sister of Luther's fatherly
friend, found a job as the mistress of a girls' school in Grimma,
even though she also got married after that in 1537. Only Katharina
von Bora was left.

Marriage with Luther

The written records of the following few years are full of gaps.
Katharina probably lived at Lukas Cranach the Elder's house. The
later mutual god-parenthood between the families and the fact that
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 161

Cranach's wife was the only woman present at the wedding is evi-
dence for this. It is at least conceivable that Katharina completed
her knowledge about managing a large household at this time,
since Cranach's home was the largest residence in Wittenberg. For
this reason King Christian II of Denmark, driven out of his land,
also stayed with Cranach in 1523. He gave Katharina a golden ring,
which perhaps was later worked into the wedding ring. 13
Though it would have been unusual, Katharina must have come
into contact with the students of the university (founded in 1502).
They called her "Katharina of Alexandria," after the patron saint
of the arts faculty. According to the Golden legend, Saint Katharina
had proven herself in academic disputations. A romance developed
with the son of a patrician from Nürnberg, Hieronymus Baum-
gartner, who visited his teacher, Philip Melanchthon, in the early
summer of 1523. In October of 1524 Luther himself wrote to
Baumgartner that Katharina was still waiting for him.14 He did not
return to the city on the Elbe, however, but instead married the
daughter of a Bavarian official in January of 1526. Certainly his
family could have had no interest in a match with a runaway nun
of no means. In 1540 Luther was still making fun of the unsuc-
cessful lover in a letter.
A further plan of marriage with the older Kaspar Glatz, pastor
in Orlamiinde, fell through at Katharinas opposition. It must have
been in this connection that the famous discussion with Nicholas
von Amsdorf took place, in which the former nun declared that
she would marry either him or Luther, otherwise she would remain
single. As is well known, Amsdorf died a bachelor.15
In the late fall of 1524, Luther himself appears to have seriously
considered a marriage, but without mentioning the name of the
chosen one in his letter. Later, Luther reported that he originally
had Ave von Schönfeld in mind, but then she married the phar-
macist Basilius Axt, an employee of Cranach's.16 Apparently, at this
time Luther was resolved to marry, mostly on theological grounds.
The outbreak of the Peasants' War seemed to him an omen that
he himself did not have much longer to live; it seemed necessary
to strengthen his criticism of monastic celibacy with his own life.
Besides this came the reconciliation with his father, who had never
162 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

forgiven his eldest son for entering the cloister.17 The final trigger
was the death of Elector Frederick the Wise, who died in May of
1525. In retrospect, Luther explained that he had hesitated with
the choice of a bride because Katharina seemed too proud to him.
The self-possession of the young woman seemed to him difficult
to reconcile with the traditional role of the man as the head of the
family. Even if it cannot ultimately be proven, the sources point to
the fact that Luther certainly took on himself the initiative to get
married, but the choice of a specific partner was finally determined
by Katharina.
There are no eye-witness accounts of the wedding on the June
13, 1525, at the Black Cloister in Wittenberg, where Luther was
living at the time with only his professional assistant and the former
prior. Johann Bugenhagen conducted the wedding ceremony
within a very narrow family circle. Fourteen days later the new-
lyweds sent invitations to a so-called Wirtschaft [Household], a
communal church-going with a festive meal following. As a sign
of its high regard the city sent twenty Gulden and one keg of beer,
the university sent a silver goblet, and the new elector, John the
Constant, sent a gift of fifty Gulden. Thus did the three most
important authorities express their recognition of Luther's mar-
riage.18
Others, however, reacted with a sense of devastation. Philip Me-
lanchthon, who had not been invited, implied in a Greek letter
from June 16, 1525, that Luther had been beguiled by the nuns.19
Luther's legal advisor at the Diet of Worms in 1521, Hieronymus
Schurff, was heard to say that now "the whole world and the devil
are laughing." The city punished the wife of Eberhard Lorenz
Jessner for publicly reviling Luther and his wife at a wedding. 20 If
even some of Luther's friends reacted negatively to the wedding,
such a reaction is hardly surprising among his enemies. King Henry
VIII of England broadcast in a pamphlet that the runaway monk
had instigated the whole Reformation just because of his lechery,
and Duke George of Saxony claimed that Luther had pressured his
fellow brothers out of the cloister. What earlier had served for
thirty monks was now consumed by one family. Scornful writings
appeared also from those old opponents of Luther, Johann Eck and
Hieronymus Emser.21
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 163

N o reaction by Katharina is recorded. It is not clear whether

she read Joachim von Heyden's German piece of invective against
her at all. Luther claimed in his reply that he had used it imme-
diately as toilet paper.22

Children

Out of the joining of a monk and a nun, went the common

saying, would come the Antichrist. The humanist Erasmus of R o t -
terdam had already joked that in that case the world must be full
of Antichrists. Nevertheless, certainly the family expected the birth
of their first child with anxiety. On the 2nd of June, 1526, their
son Johannes came into the world, receiving his name from Lu-
ther's father. This date also ended all the slander that Luther had
been forced to marry his wife because she was already pregnant by
him. Eighteen months later came the first daughter, Elisabeth. A
second daughter, Magdalena, was born on May 4th, 1529, and a
second son, who received the name Martin, on the 9th of Novem-
ber, 1531. Paul followed him on January 29th, 1533. Finally the
baby of the family, Margarethe, was born on the 17th of December,
1534. Magdalena received her name after Katharinas aunt, who
later also left the convent and lived in the Luther home; Margarethe
was named after Luther's mother.
The relatively short interval between the births is striking. It is
clear that in 1532, even though her son Martin was still breast-
feeding, Katharina became pregnant again.23 Early in the year of
1540 Katharina suffered a miscarriage and almost died. It took her
many months to recover fully.24
The Luther family was not spared by the high mortality rate of
children in the sixteenth century, although their two cases appear
to be very different. In Luther's letters there is hardly anything to
be learned about the death of Elisabeth, who was only ten months
old. The communication with his friends is rather formal and in-
cidental. Very different is his behavior on the death of Magdalena
in 1542. Even here there are no recorded reactions of her mother,
leaving aside the fact that Magdalena passed away in the arms of
her father, evidently since her mother was not able to master her
164 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

desperation.25 Luther's grief can also be observed in a moving way

The theologian who had comforted so many grieving people
found comfort only laboriously in prayer. Precisely because he was
of the conviction that the death of his daughter meant a passage
over into a better world, his own difficult grief, which he contin-
ually tried to work out in letters and table talk, was troubling to
him. In contrast, Katharina seems inarticulate. It is noticeable,
however, that from this time on, she tried everything to keep her
children in her own house. At her initiative, Johannes, who was
attending a school in Torgau in 1542, was called back, even though
he found his sister no longer living. After that, his education took
place in Wittenberg, which indicates at least a latent conflict with
Luther, who pleaded for following the custom of the time, which
was to have the sons study away from home as early as possible.
As a pedagogue, Luther complied to a great extent with the
conventions of his time, even though he increased the standards,
since he derived from the fourth commandment the responsibility
of parents for their children not only in this world but also in the
next. Corporal punishment seemed to him to be biblically com-
manded, if necessary, in order to enforce the commandment re-
garding parents, which was also biblically grounded. At the same
time, however, it was for him important to punish moderately and
appropriately, to lay "the apple next to the switch." Sons should
accordingly experience a tougher education than daughters, who
stayed in the mother's domain.
To judge from the letters, Luther followed the growth of their
older children with much greater attention than that of the
younger ones. When we remember that he was forty-three years
old at the birth of the first one and already fifty-one at the birth
of the last one, this seems understandable. It is furthermore assumed
that with Luther's work load, his activity of upbringing was rather
sporadic and was limited to the sons. On the other hand, only
traces of Katharinas pedagogy are recorded, since it happened in
the everyday routine, which usually seemed not worth reporting.
There must have been an indirect conflict with Luther especially
in connection with the eldest. Johannes was obviously not too
gifted intellectually, which did not stop his mother from contin-
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 165

uously requesting scholarships for him at the University of Kö-

nigsberg after the death of her husband.26 Without wishing to make
a causal connection, it should still be noted that it was the two
youngest children who were successful in life. At 23 years old, Paul
earned a degree as a doctor of medicine and served as physician
successively to Duke Johann Friedrich of Saxony, Elector Joachim
II of Brandenburg and Elector August of Saxony. He died in 1593
in Leipzig.27 Margarethe married a nobleman from eastern Prussia
and moved with him close to Königsberg, where in 1570 she died
in her ninth childbirth.28 On the other hand, Johannes Luther, in
spite of his long-term studies, never held a position, and his short
marriage remained childless. Until his death in 1575, he was main-
tained by Duke Albrecht of Prussia in Königsberg. The second
son, Martin, stayed in Wittenberg, although without a firm vo-
cation. He died of alcoholism in 1565 at barely thirty-four years
old.29 The conditions of life in the sixteenth century, different from
ours, forbid a psychologizing of history, but the fate of Luther's
children nevertheless seems to be a variation on the old problem
of the descendants of a great man.

House and Grounds

Today, whoever stands in front of the imposing buildings of the

former Black Cloister in Wittenberg recognizes very quickly how
misleading it is to call Katharina "Luther's housewife" by today's
standards.30 The function that Katharina fulfilled can be described
in modern terms more as "manager of a mid-sized business with
low intensity production." Evidently unaffected by six pregnancies
in only eight years, she succeeded in organizing both the family
and the household economy in a relatively short time.
Its beginnings were not at all promising. At the time of the
wedding the Cloister was in bad structural condition, and the fam-
ily lacked a regular income. Only from the end of 1525 did Luther
receive a fixed annual salary of two hundred Gulden, which later
was raised to three hundred Gulden, although offset by rampant
inflation. From 1527 on, there were increases in natural produce
166 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

as well: wheat, barley for brewing beer, and firewood. The pro-
cessing of these materials presupposes some settled servants, but we
have no information about how many there were. There is men-
tion of a coachman, a swineherd, and a cook, but there were surely
more. 31 At least from 1529 on, students and their teachers found
for a fee accommodation in Luther's house. To live with the great
man under one roof was regarded as an honor that Katharina let
people pay for appropriately The writers of the informative table
talks stem from the ranks of these students. Relatives of Luther
came as well, nieces and nephews, who populated the Black Clois-
ter for a long time. On Katharina s side, there was her nephew,
Florian von Bora, and her aunt, who evidently worked with her
in managing the household. Despite a few fluctuations, we can
place the number of regular inhabitants of the house at thirty or
forty, not counting the numerous guests who came for short pe-
riods of time.
To accommodate so many, a physical extension of the house
became necessary, which Katharina directed. The renovations and
expansions were undertaken mainly between 1536 and 1540. The
only surviving result, if one leaves aside the entrance gate erected
in 1540,32 is the so-called Luther parlor on the first floor of the
former cloister. Four heated rooms were provided above it at the
same time. On July 12, 1532, a newly dug cellar collapsed, almost
killing Luther and his wife.33 A succession of buildings for eco-
nomic purposes were built on the grounds: stalls for the livestock,
a brewery, and in 1541 a bath house, which Luther had lined with
slabs of sandstone from Pirna.34 The letters show that Katharina
was the driving force behind these building projects. In this respect
it can reasonably be assumed that she also made the choice con-
cerning the location of the living space of the family within the
cloister. Why else would one move into rooms on the sunless north
side, except that from there one had an excellent view of all the
business going on throughout the grounds? The kitchen on the
ground floor was also easily reached from there by a staircase, now
lost.
Although no contemporary comments by Katharina remain, the
retrospective view of Nikolas von Amsdorf is perfectly believable,
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 167

namely, that Luther originally wanted to abandon the cloister en-

tirely and move into a suitable new building instead, analogous to
the sizeable but practical house that Philip Melanchthon received
in 1536 as a gift from the Elector. Amsdorf s claim that Katharina
thwarted the idea because she wanted to derive great material ben-
efit out of the students' lodging fees is unpersuasive if one considers
the investment expended. Nevertheless, the sentence Amsdorf put
in her mouth retains a certain believable quality: "I have to get the
doctor used to my different way so that he does it the way I want
it." Luther himself had already complained in 1533, "I may Uve in
a big house, but I would rather be free from it."35 The formal
transfer of the property of the former cloister to Luther by Elector
Johann the Constant, endorsed by his son and successor Johann
Friedrich on March 6th, 1536, prevented any further consideration
of such a move. Interestingly, however, the transfer contained a
first-refusal clause for the university in case of a resale. Apparently,
the electoral lawyers did not consider such a sale impossible.
A comment in 1536 by the lawyer Hieronymus Schurff, who
was not one of Katharinas friends, supplies proof for Katharinas
interest in becoming the owner or co-owner of the cloister. He
advised her to take the big house "and as long as one offers you a
piglet, hold the bag open. If Christ is forgotten, so will Luther be
forgotten as well." Katharina was yet to have a taste, after 1546, of
how right Schurff was with the second sentence.36
Schurff s deft metaphor also points to Katharinas second area of
activity, agriculture. The extension of the house was accompanied
by the development of the garden, which at first even pleased Lu-
ther. It was cultivated not only with economically useful plants but
also with fruits and spices. Since the climate in Wittenberg was
demonstrably milder than today, attempts with melons and squash
were successful, although the effort at planting figs fell through.
Katharina was especially proud of a successful crop of saffron, since
this spice usually had to be purchased at a high price. The motive
of a subsistence economy also played a decisive role in the raising
of livestock. It is clear from tax statements that in March of 1542
eight pigs (gilts) and two sows with three piglets populated the
Luther grounds, as well as five cows and nine big calves, and a goat
168 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

with two kids. For the latter, Katharina, along with Melanchthon's
wife, must have obtained a special permit, since the elector had in
1537 forbidden the Wittenbergers to raise goats, taking the newly
erected fortification walls into consideration. Certainly poultry
were also part of the stock of animals, but they played no role in
the reckoning of taxes. The repeatedly mentioned dog was more
of a pet; a cat in Luther's household cannot be proven.37 The ex-
panse of the existing garden was not enough to support the family,
let alone the added cultivation of fodder for the livestock. Con-
sequently, Katharina sought to acquire a further tract of land as
early as 1526, but it did not happen until the beginning of the
1530S, when Luther bought a garden in front of the Elster gate for
ninety Gulden. From a letter it is indisputable that Katharina was
the driving force behind this transaction. On legal grounds Luther's
name had to be on the title; however, his wife moved him to it by
"begging and crying." In 1536 a second plot of land was added to
it from the property of Klaus Heffner, a sculptor. A stream flowed
through it, which provided fish. This garden cost nine hundred
Gulden, or three years earnings for Luther, who had to borrow
money for it. Luther gained a third garden in 1544. In the same
year he bought yet another adjoining acre. All the plots of ground
were near the cloister, thus just outside the northeast front part of
the city.38
The property did not satisfy Katharina. In a letter of 1539, the
only one recorded in the critical edition of Luther's works, she
turned to the Landesrentmeister (a Saxon official), Hans von Tau-
benheim, a distant relative of hers, to lease a large outlying farm
on the other side of the Elbe. An attempt at this had already failed
in 1536. She explicitly explained that she did not intend to take
over the farm under her ownership. That is, it belonged to the
elector, but she wanted only to lease it for one or two years. This
letter mentions a slander that von Taubenheim should not believe.
Evidently the suspicion had emerged in public that Katharina had
few scruples when it came to enlarging her property 39 The lease
was negotiated, even if, in the opinion of Hieronymus Schurff, it
was with an inappropriately low payment. How long it lasted, we
do not know. In this process it is remarkable that by writing herself
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 169

Katharina abandoned the fiction that Luther was in charge of the

action.40
Finally, in 1540 Katharina took the opportunity to appropriate
the former family property of Zöllsdorf, which her brother, Hans
von Bora, had not been able to hold. This outlying farm lay south
of Leipzig, a two days'journey away from Wittenberg, which en-
tailed the long-term absence of Katharina from Wittenberg. 41 In
1545 Luther considered it as the place to end his days.42 The price
of purchase came to six hundred Gulden, even though considerable
investments were necessary. The fact that Katharina could leave her
own household alone often and for a long time speaks for her
organizational talent. To be sure, Luther was not overly enthused
about this. Even after his death, Katharina succeeded with the help
of the elector, in acquiring yet another piece of property on the
other side of the Elbe.
The extended transactions over land plots, which repeatedly
pushed the limits of what is economically sensible, permit a few
conclusions. First, Katharina's personality was evidently shaped
lifelong by her origin and family. Considering the fate of her father
and brother, she saw the possession of land not only as something
worth striving for but also as something that grants security. Sec-
ond, her business transactions clear away the legend of the "poor"
Luther. The anecdotal description of a cash shortage, as well as a
few exaggerated statements by Luther about himself, have given
the impression that the family lived at a subsistence level. If one
excludes the early years until 1528/1529, which really were diffi-
cult, then the opposite is the case. At his death Luther was counted
among the richest residents of the city The steadily growing in-
flation, joined with a rise in agricultural prices, made the purchase
of real estate seem economically sensible, even if it was financed
on credit. That wars and crop failures could bring this construction
quickly to a collapse became evident after 1546. The credit for
their economic expansion is finally due to Katharina alone. Some-
times she had to carry out her plans over and against Luther s ex-
plicit resistance. That this did not lead to serious conflicts rested
above all on the fact that Luther took seriously his own concepts
of the position of a man and a woman in marriage.
170 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

Husband and Wife

Luther's Reformation did not exclude the celibate life in prin-

ciple, but saw in it a special gift of God. In contrast, the normal
rule of human existence was marriage, to which he alloted three
important functions: help against unchastity; bringing up children,
as the biblical tradition describes it; and, as a third and new accent,
the mutual comfort and assistance of the married couple.
Precisely because Luther's objectives were conservative in them-
selves, he created a new understanding of marriage. He distin-
guished the areas of responsibility of the spouses in the traditional
way. The husband represented the family outside, in the sphere of
the politeia; the wife was in charge of the house, responsible for the
oikonomia. It is Luther's contribution to have emphasized and
stressed anew the equal value of these two realms. Theologically
he did this especially with his doctrine of vocation. In his re-
evaluation of worldly activity Luther explicitly included household
obligations and child-rearing among the callings intended by God
and entitled to the same dignity as the masculine callings. Women
are in no way excluded from the general priesthood of all believers,
although this doctrine does not imply that the preaching office is
for all, whether men or women. 43 Luther knows women as holders
of the spiritual office only in extreme cases of need precisely be-
cause of their commitment to the household realm.
More important in our context is the fact that Luther took very
seriously for himself personally the implementation of his theology
of vocation. The legal conditions of his time limited the economic
independence of women by their dependence on men in court
and in the concluding of business deals, indicating the governing
function of the man with respect to his wife. The best proof that
Luther tried to change this is his will from 1542.44
He appointed his wife his sole heir, explicitly rejecting guardi-
anship for her and, in fact, assigning the guardianship of the chil-
dren to her. According to Saxon law this was impossible in several
ways. The wife was only entitled to the so-called Leibgedinge, that
is, usufruct, not ownership in a specific part of the real estate. The
possession of land passed over to the children; if there were none
 KATHARINA VON BORA, THE WOMAN AT LUTHER'S SIDE 171

existing, the relatives on the man's side inherited it. Minors were
appointed guardians in order to secure their rights. In extreme
cases, a son who was of age could be the guardian of his own
mother, which Luther considered a clear violation of the fourth
commandment. In a table talk from 1541 Luther summarizes his
thoughts:

My books are here, which I leave behind to my children; may they see that they
are not smarter than their father. You, Käthe, I appoint the sole heir. You have
borne the children and extended your breast to them. You will not manage their
affairs to their detriment. I am an enemy of the guardians; they seldom do it
well.45

The formulating of the will presupposes that his intentions also

retained validity if Katharina should marry again. Although the
elector confirmed Luther's will on the n t h of April, 1546, the
Saxon lawyers did not permit its execution. Katharina received a
guardian in exactly the same way as her children.
Luther's motives for this unusual will were various. For one
thing, the particular personality of his wife certainly played a role.
He thought he could trust her more than his friends in economic
matters. Furthermore, Luther's aversion to lawyers must be con-
sidered. In the will he explicitly emphasizes that he is avoiding the
normal formulas of the law. Finally, this last will fits into a series
of Luther's efforts to provide the new position of pastor's wife and
pastor's widow with an acceptable maintenance for living. In 1539
he had to intervene for the widow of a pastor in Neiden near
Torgau. In 1540 the brother of Ave von Schönfeld withheld the
share of the inheritance to which she was entitled.46 In the cases
of both these women, their relatives referred to the vow of celibacy,
which did not allow a legally valid marriage. For the former monk
who had married a nun, this was cause to intervene. In the end
the authorities had to settle the problem. Duke Ernst of Saxony-
Gotha created the first cash-box for the widows of pastors, but
only in 1645.
The attitude of Luther expressed in his will was itself disputed
among his friends. It was suspected that he was henpecked. For
this reason a statement by Luther from February of 1542 was en-
172 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

thusiastically circulated, namely, that he could be completely con-

trolled by his wife when it came to house and grounds. "But in
matters of conscience and of the scriptures I know no teacher,
professor or master except the Holy Spirit." The problem was that
things which could be separated cleanly in theory had a tendency
to get mixed up in daily life.47
Certainly the couple held to the conventions. Even in the pres-
ence of his friends, Katharina called her husband only "Herr Dok-
tor" and used the formal form of "you." But the fact that she took
part in the table conversations regularly and even expressed her
opinion was borne only with difficulty by some admirers of Luther.
Luther furthered her interest in his work as far as Katharinas own
responsibilities allowed. His offer in the fall of 1535 to give her
fifty Gulden if she read through the whole German Bible by Easter
of the next year is characteristic. Luther used the mercantile ten-
dency in Katharina's nature in connection with the first edition of
the 1534 translation of the Bible in Wittenberg. 48
The extent of her knowledge of Latin is difficult to determine.
Evidently she could follow the German-Latin mixing of languages
at the table. Some indications point to the fact that she herself
sometimes spoke in Latin. The note-takers called her "Doctorissa,"
a newly coined word with a note of reluctant admiration in it. In
his report from the Marburg Disputation with Ulrich Zwingli in
1529, Luther assumed that Katharina could understand the argu-
ments carried on in Latin and could then recount them to Luther's
friend, Johann Bugenhagen. 49
A close friendship connected Katharina to Bugenhagen. On
July 2, 1540, Luther requested that the two of them choose a new
pastor for the Count of Schwarzburg. Here the Reformer himself
overstepped his own boundary between domestic and official ac-
tivities. Characteristically, none of the other wives of the reformers
is mentioned in such a connection. Conversely, it furthered one's
friendship with Luther to send gifts to his wife, which prompted
her thanks and greetings in numerous letters.50
Luther included the wives of his friends in his attention. But the
position of his wife was as unique in this circle of friends as his
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 173

own. As a rule, however, this consideration ended at theological

differences. Thus, in the summer of 1537 Katharina did not suc-
ceed in reconciling Luther with Johann Agricola again, even
though his wife Else, whom Luther also liked, was her best friend.
The close living and working together of the Luther couple
prompted more than positive reactions. When Dr. Martin unex-
pectedly died on February 18, 1546, in Eisleben, it seemed that
the time had come to settle old scores. Indeed, Elector Johann
Friedrich stood protectively in front of the widow, but the begin-
ning of the Schmalkald War tied up his attention. Furthermore,
Katharina insisted on the conditions of Luther's will and refused to
leave the Black Cloister. She tried instead to continue the hostel
and, with the help of Philip Melanchthon, who was appointed as
her guardian, she applied to the elector in March of 1546 for the
acquisition of the Wachsdorf property. In November of that year,
Wittenberg University was temporarily dissolved. Melanchthon
fled to Anhalt under the crush of advancing imperial troops and
Katharina followed him with the children. She returned to Wit-
tenberg after a few weeks, but in April of 1547 she fled again by
way of Magdeburg to Braunschweig.51 Her goal was originally C o -
penhagen, since she hoped for asylum with the king of Denmark,
who had supported her with regular annual payments of fifty Gul-
den. But the wagon with her and the children had to turn back
north of Lüneburg. 52
In the late fall of 1547 the family was in Wittenberg again. The
motive for the flight remains unclear. Katharina had been closely
connected to Melanchthon, who tried to the best of his ability to
care for the family, even though there was hardly a close friendship
between him and Katharina. It is certain that the double flight
exhausted the cash reserves of the family. Crop failures and plun-
dering by soldiers in the Schmalkald War restricted the income to
the family property, such that Katharina stood temporarily at the
edge of bankruptcy. After the battle at Mühlberg she lost her elec-
toral protector as well. The new Elector Moritz of Albertine line-
age stood aloof from her and did not answer a petition of
September 1548, in which she requested continuation of the an-
174 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

nual contribution of one hundred bushels and two Maltern [ap-

proximately 300 liters] of grain as well as one hundred cords of
wood. 53
The reports of the following years remain sparse. Economically,
Katharina got back on her feet only laboriously. Melanchthon sup-
ported her in a court case before a Leipzig official regarding the
Zöllsdorf property. She secured scholarships for her sons from
Duke Albrecht of Prussia and from Duke Christoph of Württem-
berg. In October of 1551, Katharina's debts had increased so much
that she had to take out a mortgage on Zöllsdorf.
In August of 1552, the university moved to Torgau because of
the plague raging in Wittenberg. Katharina followed in October.
However, outside the gates of the city she fell from the coach and
sustained internal injuries. She died from them on the 20th of
December, 1552. Where she last stayed in Torgau is not known.
A Latin obituary by Philip Melanchthon represents the only source
for her death and her burial.54 The singularity of this source throws
a significant light on Katharina's existence as a widow. Although
Torgau was full of friends and colleagues of her husband's in the
autumn of 1552, there are no signs of encounters and assistance.
In spite of all attempts, Luther's wife did not succeed in establishing
herself as an independent personality. The limits of the time, which
she could only transcend jointly with Luther, did not allow this.

Images of Katharina

At the beginning of the sixteenth century women played prac-

tically no public role in matters that did not directly concern female
saints or rulers. We have only a handful of images of non-noble-
women recorded from that period in Germany. The ones we have
involve mainly rich patricians from southern Germany.55
In contrast, Martin Luther aroused such great attention through
his effect on the public, especially as the author of pamphlets from
1518 on, that a demand for his image very quickly emerged. The
first, a copper plate engraving by Lukas Cranach, came on the
market in 1520;56 more followed at short intervals. Evidently, ev-
 K A T H A R I N A V O N B O R A , THE W O M A N AT LUTHER'S SIDE 175

erything that had to do with Luther was of interest to a wide public,

especially since the Reformer yielded to this interest with spectac-
ular actions, like the burning of the Bull threatening his excom-
munication in December of 1520. The same thing goes for Luther's
wedding on the 13 th of June, 1525. The wedding ceremony
worked like a seal on Luther's teaching that the life of the religious
orders was not pleasing to God.
In connection with the wedding Lukas Cranach the Elder, court
artist of the Wettin rulers and a friend of Luther's in Wittenberg,
painted the first double image of the "freshly baked" couple. This
fact in itself is remarkable, and yet more interesting is the fact that
it did not stop there. Even though several specimens have been
lost, four examples of the round, small wedding portraits have
come to us. A little later, Cranach issued a second series in a small
rectangular format, of which likewise four specimens have sur-
vived, and after 1526 a third series emerged, with five pictures still
surviving today.57 A common feature of all is that they were con-
ceived as double images, even if today the pairs have been separated
from each other or even lost. It follows from this that the artist had
only a limited interest in Katharina von Bora as a person and
wanted rather to portray her as Luther's lawfully wedded wife. The
pictorial propaganda of the Reformation was involved to a certain
extent, since the claim that a monk could get married according
to divine and human right led straight into the middle of Luther's
Reformation. 58 This interpretation is supported by the fact that the
double images of the Luther couple were replaced after 1530 by
those portraying Luther and Melanchthon. The married Luther
was no longer at issue, but rather it was essential to prove the unity
between the two leaders of the Reformation, which had been
questioned in view of the dispute about the Augsburg Confession.
This does not mean that Katharina was understood merely as a
shadow of Luther, as an interesting, but finally unnecessary ingre-
dient. Rather, the opposite is the case. For no images at all are
recorded of the wives of the other reformers.59 This is true not
only for the Wittenberg circle of Melanchthon and Johann Bug-
enhagen, but also for Martin Bucer and John Calvin. The singu-
larity of the portrayal of Katharina von Bora, therefore, has to do
176 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

first with her public role as Luther's consort, but also, inseparably
linked to this, with her individuality, which she asserted at the side
of her husband.
Thus the image of Katharina remains defined by its reflection
in Luther's statements. There is only partial access to her in herself.
This may be appropriate, however, insofar as she understood herself
first as Luther's wife. By today's standards that may be very little;
nevertheless, we owe to this self-understanding the fact that the
form of Katharina von Bora is recorded for us at all.

NOTES

i. The handwriting with the line supposedly in her own hand, reproduced in Al-
brecht Thoma, Katharina von Bora: Geschichtliches Lebensbild (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1900),
265, actually comes from Melanchthon. See Melanchthons Briefwechsel, Kritische und kom-
mentierte Gesamtausgabe, Regesten: 8 vols., Texte: 2 vols. Ed. Heinz Scheible (Stuttgart
and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1977fr.), 6, # 5 9 / 7 . (Hereafter cited as MBW.)
2. Published in Martin Luthers Briefe, Sendschreiben und Bedenken, Martin Leberecht de
Wette and Johann Karl Seidemann, eds., vol. 6 (Berlin: Reimer, 1856), 650, together
with a letter of Florian von Bora's and one of his mother's, Christina, to Heinrich Hil-
debrand von Einsiedel at Gnandstein, both from April 7, 1546. Katharina's letter came
to Wittenberg in 1911. but now is considered a casualty of war.
3. Wilhelm Beste, Die Geschichte der Katharina von Bora, nach den Quellen bearbeitet
(Halle: Mühlmann, 1843), 12, provides a detailed description as well as the citation from
the letter to Thomas Lupset: "Luther, that happy and favored one, having put off the
mantle of philosophy, took a wife, from the noted Bora family, a girl of elegant appearance,
26 years old but poor."
4. Thomas summary of the state of affairs is still current. See his Katharina von Bora,
268-71. A newer work by Wolfgang Liebehenschel from Berlin has been announced.
5. Luthers Werke, Briefwechsel, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 11 vols. Ed. G. Bebermeyer
(Weimar: Böhlau, 1930fr.), 6: 51-55. (Hereafter cited as WA, Br.) See Alfred Schmidt,
Geschichte des Aagustinerinnenklosters St Clemens zu Brehna (Brenna: R . Kiemle, 1924), 4f.
6. Thoma, Katharina von Bora, 12.
7. Ludwig Schmidt, ed., Codex Dtplomattcus Saxoniae regis II, vol. 15, Urkundenbuch
von Grimma und Ximbschen (Leipzig, 1898), 337f.
8. An impressive account of relationships among impoverished minor nobility is
found in Ulrich von Hütten s letter to Willibald Pirckheimer from October 25, 1518, in
Ulrich Huttem: Opera, ed. Eduard Böcking (Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von B. G. Teubner,
1859), 1:195-217.
9. Martin Luther, Eine Geschichte, wie Gott einer ehrbaren Klosterjungfrau ausgeholfen hat,
with a circular letter of Luther's to the Counts of Mansfeld and Wittenberg (originally
published by Cranach und Döring in Wittenberg, 1524.) See Josef Benzing, Lutherbiblw-
 KATHARINA V O N BORA, THE W O M A N AT L U T H E R ' S SIDE 177

graphie, Verzeichnis der gedruckten Schriften Martin Luthers bis zu dessen Tod (Baden-Baden:
Heitz, 1966), #1895. Luthers Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 65 vols. Eds. J. F. Κ. Knaake
et al. (Weimar: Bohlau, 1883fr.), 15:86-94 (Hereafter cited as WA.) Luther's Works, Amer­
ican Edition, 55 vols. Eds. Pelikan and Lehmann (St. Louis and Philadelphia: Concordia
and Fortress, 1955fr), 43:85-96. (Hereafter cited as LW)
10. Martin Treu, Martin Luther und Torgau (Wittenberg: Drei Kastamen Verlag, 1995),
16-20.
11. Benzing, Lutherbibliographie, #1247. WA io II 275-304. LW 45:17-49.
12. Benzing, Lutherbibliographie, #1561 WA 11:394-400
13. Thoma, Katharina von Bora, 39.
14 WA,Br 2.358.7-10, from October 12, 1524
15. Beste, Die Geschichte der Katharina von Bora, 23
16 Wa,Br 6:169.13f. to Johann Bnesmann in Komgsberg on August 24, 1531.
17 Luther's letter to his father in Mansfeld on February 15, 1530, supports the fact
that Katharina, too, later had a warm relationship with her parents-in-law. WA,Br 5:
239-15 LW 49:268
18. Martin Treu, Katharina von Bora (Wittenberg: Drei Kastanien Verlag, 1996),
28-30
19 MBW, Texte 2:323-29, #1995, from June 16, 1525, to Joachim Cameranus.
20. Strafbuch Sign. 1020/7296, in the archives of the city of Wittenberg.
21. Beste, Die Geschichte der Katharina von Bora, 20; see also note 56.
22. WA,Br 4-526-31, from August 10, 1528 Compare WA,Br 4:538.8f., from Au­
gust 16, 1528 to Wenzel Link m Nürnberg.
23. Luthers Werke, Tischreden, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 6 vols. Ed. Karl Drescher
(Weimar: Bohlau, 1912fr.), 2:186.15-18, #1697. (Hereafter cited as WA, TR.) LW
54:162
24. Only in April was she restored to health. See WA,Br 9:70.35 to Melanchthon on
April 8, 1540.
25 However, see WA,Br 10:149.21. LW 50:238
26. MBW 6, #6061 from April 23, 1551 Another earlier letter comes from May 29,
1549. The writer of both letters is Philip Melanchthon
27 Treu, Katharina von Bora, jgf
28. Albrecht Nietzki, Margarete von Kunheim, Martin Luthers jüngste und einzige ihn
überlebende Tochter, ihr Gemahl Georg von Kunheim und deren Nachkommen bis zur Gegenwart
(Königsberg: Evangelische Buchhandlung für innere Mission, 1900).
29. F. L. C. Freiherr von Medem, Die Universitatsjahre der Herzoge Ernst Ludwig und
Barnim von Pommern (Anklam, 1867.)
30 Fritz Bellmann et al., eds Die Denkmale der Lutherstadt Wittenberg (Weimar· Boh-
lau, 1979), 41-46, 228-29.
31. Helmar Junghans, ed., Leben und Werk Martin Luthers von 1525-1546 (Gottingen:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983), vol. 1, Luther in Wittenberg, by Helmar Junghans,
11-37, with notes in vol. 2, 723-32
32. WA,Br 8 609.17 and WA,Br 9:138.20 from June 15, 1540 to Anton Lauterbach.
33. WA,TR 3:239.3-9, #3264b
34. WA,TR 2:144.32-145.2, #1591 A draft of the plan of the cloister and grounds
is found in Herrmann Stein, Geschichte des Lutherhauses (Wittenberg, 1883), 15
35. Treu, Katharina von Bora, 46f.
178 LUTHERAN QUARTERLY

36. W A , T R 4:580.24-581.4, #4920.

37. Treu, Katharina von Bora, 49.
38. WA,Br 9:578f. See also Karl Ludwig Seidemann, "Luthers Grundbesitz," Zeit-
schrift fur die historische Tlteologie (i86o):475~570.
39. WA,Br8:42of.
40. WA, T R 2:290.12-16, #1995, where Luther says about the purchase of a garden:
"by herself and not by me, and against me, not for me. . . . I am not able to bear her
begging or her tears."
41. Thoma, Katharina von Bora, 84-86.
42. WA,Br 11:149.9-15. LW 50:278.
43. WA 8:498.12-14. LW 36:152: "But if no man were to preach, then it would be
necessary for the women to preach." (Tlie Misuse of the Mass.)
44. WA,Br 9:571-74. LW 34:295-97.
45. W A , T R 4:631.11-14, #5041.
46. WA,Br 8:394fr. See also Treu, Martin Luther und Torgau, \^î.
47. Markus Crodel to Stephan R o t h in Zwickau, in Georg Buchwald, ed., Zur Wit-
tenberger Stadt- und Universitatsgeschichte in der Reformationszeit (Leipzig: G. Wigand, 1893),
I76f., #209.
48. WA,Br 7:317.15 and 322.27. LW 50:108 and 112.
49. WA,Br 5:154.13-16 from October 4, 1529. LW 49:237.
50. WA,Br 9:168.10-15. LW 50:209.
51. Thoma, Katharina von Bora, 241-46.
52. M B W 5, #5278.
53. Johannes Herrmann and Günter Wartenberg, eds., Politische Korrespondenz des
Herzogs und Kurfürsten Mortiz von Sachsen, vol. 4(Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992), 139,
#95 in the register. The letter is unpublished.
54. Scripta publica Universitatis Wittenbergense, vol. 1 (Wittenberg: Peter Seitz, 1553),
sheets 97—99.
55. Anette Völker-Rasor, Bilderpaare—Paarbilder: Die Ehe in Autobiographien des 16.
Jahrhunderts (Freiburg: Rombach, 1993).
56. Martin Luther, 1483-1546: Katalog der Hauptausstellung in der Lutherhalle Wit-
tenberg (Berlin: Schelsky & Jeep, 1993), 96f.
57. For the listing I am indebted to the research of my colleague, Jutta Strehle, at the
Luther house. The classification of a picture in Leipzig supposedly portraying Katharina
as a widow remains unclear.
58. Werner Hoffmann, ed., Luther und die Folgen fur die bildende Kunst, Catalogue of
the Exhibition at the Hamburg Art Gallery (München: Prestel-Verlag, 1983). For these
and other images of Katharina, see the following article by Frederick Schumacher.
59. Alice Zimmerli-Witschi, "Frauen in der Reformationszeit" (Dissertation in T h e -
ology, University of Zürich, 1981).
 ^ s
Copyright and Use:

As an ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use
according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as
otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.

No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the
copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,
reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a
violation of copyright law.

This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permission
from the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal
typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,
for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.
Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specific
work for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered
by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the
copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,
or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).

About ATLAS:

The ATLA Serials (ATLAS®) collection contains electronic versions of previously

published religion and theology journals reproduced with permission. The ATLAS
collection is owned and managed by the American Theological Library Association
(ATLA) and received initial funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.

The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the American
Theological Library Association.