See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/267582789

Contact Stress, Frictional Torque and Lubrication in Articulating Pin Joints

Conference Paper · January 2007

DOI: 10.1115/IJTC2007-44230

CITATIONS READS
0 86

2 authors, including:

Rob Dwyer-Joyce
The University of Sheffield
238 PUBLICATIONS   3,211 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

ANN for Tribological Applications View project

Ultrasonic Detectability of Compressed Cracks View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Rob Dwyer-Joyce on 15 September 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Proceedings of STLE/ASME International Joint Tribology Conference
IJTC2007
October 22-24, 2007, San Diego, California USA

IJTC2007-44230

CONTACT STRESS, FRICTIONAL TORQUE AND LUBRICATION IN ARTICULATING

PIN JOINTS

Contact Stress, Frictional Torque And Lubrication In Articulating Pin Joints

R. S. Dwyer-Joyce, University of Sheffield, UK. A.Beke, University of Sheffield, UK.

ABSTRACT end the pin, usually steel, is free to rotate in bushes that are
Pin joints are used in many items of industrial machinery press fitted or welded into structural components. As the
where two structural members are required to articulate. A pin structural members articulate the pin rotates in the bush and
is assembled between typically four bushes. As the members then returns. The cost of the machine and the loading regime
articulate the pin rotates relatively slowly inside the bushes. A dictates the design of the pin joint. For example high end joints
hydraulic test machine has been developed to load and in landing gear use hollow corrosion resistant alloy steel pins
articulate a 56 mm diameter pin held in four bushes, typical of rotating inside aluminium bronze bushes with designed
that found in earth moving machinery and aircraft landing gear. lubrication channels; whilst a mass produced earth mover
The rig is capable of applying realistic loads and speeds of might use a solid steel pin in a simple steel bush welded to the
articulation, whilst measuring torque and angular displacement. chassis.
The test machine design and operation is described. The joints usually rotate at relatively slow speed,
The pin joint is lubricated with mineral oil based grease. compared to a conventional journal bearing. Lubrication is with
Joint rotation is relatively slow and hydrodynamic calculations a single grease fill that is topped up to a service schedule. Since
predict that the joint operates in the boundary regime. During a a machine may have many pin joints, re-lubrication is costly
single cycle the torque remains largely constant, with a static and liable to be intermittent. In this project tribological design
friction peak at the beginning and end of the cycle. of the pin joint assembly has been studied. A purpose built rig
Measurements of the torque during articulation demonstrate has been used to load and articulate the joint whilst studying
friction coefficients varying from 0.02 to 0.12 depending on the contact stress and frictional torque behaviour.
rotational speed.
The contact stress distribution between the pin and PIN JOINT FUNCTION TESTER
bushes was estimated by an ultrasonic method. An ultrasonic Figure 1 shows the pin joint test assembly. The apparatus uses a
pulse was sent through the hollow pin and reflected back from double fork arrangement (one in blue and the other in yellow).
the pin-bush interface. High contact pressures causes To simplify analysis of the pin and bush contacts and to turn
conformity between the pin and bush and so the wave passes and drive the pin, the outer fork bush bearings were replaced
through. The proportion of the sound wave reflected was used with roller bearings. Therefore for all pin function tests only
to estimate the contact stress distribution. The results showed the central yellow fork, bush bearing contacts, were tested. A
how the stress is maximum in the outer bushes and over a 60° hydraulic cylinder fits in the space between the outer blue fork
arc of the pin. The results of the study can be used to and the inner yellow fork. This is used to apply the lateral load
understand how pin joints function and how they may be on the joint (in steps from 0 to 180 kN). The whole assembly
optimised. sits on top of a MAYES Torsion/ Tension servo-hydraulic
machine. Only the torsion actuator is used in this case (i.e. the
INTRODUCTION pin has no axial loading).
Pin joints are everywhere in machines. From simple split To drive and turn the pin during testing, four slots were
pins in mechanical linkages, to heavy load bearing pins in earth wire cut at one end of all test pins. The slots enabled a direct
moving equipment or aircraft landing gear. At the heavy duty line axial coupling via a splined interface to the MAYES rig

1 Copyright © 2007 by ASME

torsion drive shaft. The torsional cylinder was driven in FRICTIONAL TORQUE
displacement control and the transducer used to record the Figure 3 shows a typical torque cycle from the pin when is
driving torque over the cycle. Angular displacement of ±50° loaded at 5kN and articulated at 0.033Hz.
was possible and maximum driving torques of 200 Nm.

Figure 3. Typical torque cycle from a pin loaded at 5kN.

Figure 1. Photograph of the pin joint test apparatus.
There is a peak in the torque at the start of each articulation (in
both directions). This is the static friction part and is caused
LUBRICATION because the grease has been squeezed out of the contact. The
The bearing grooves are fully flooded with amineral torque drops during the articulation, reaches a minimum at
oil based greas. The speed of rotation experienced by the pin around 0°, and then rises again. This demonstrates that the
joint is relatively slow compared with a typical journal bearing. torque reduces as the joint speed increases. The sliding motion
Since the bearing is reciprocating the film drops to zero as the between pin and bush entrains some grease and generates a thin
ends of the stroke and increases to a maximum at the centre of grease film. This explains the torque reduction.
the articulation. In the experimental work rotational frequencies The corresponding friction coefficients are ~0.12. This is in the
were varied from 0.02 to 5 Hz for a range of +/- 50° boundary regime; there is likely to be lots of asperity contact
corresponding to mean surface speeds in the range 2 mm/s to and only a very thin layer of grease. The curves are virtually
500 mm/s. symmetrical as expected. There does seem to be some slight
The geometry of the bearing bushes is such that they can be oscillation on the forward stroke. This is probably some feature
treated using the narrow bearing approximation [1] (there are of the machine dynamics. Figure 4 shows a similar series of
four bushes divided into two separate bearing surfaces each cycles at increasing load.
with an L/D ratio equal to 0.125). Predicted oil film are
displayed in figure 2 for a selection of bearing speeds.
1.2
5 Hz
Maximum film thickness, microns

0.8
2 Hz
0.6
1 Hz
0.4

0.2 0.1 Hz
0.02 Hz
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Pin Load, kN
Figure 4 Series of torque cycles at increasing pin lateral load.
Figure 2. Predicted oil film formation for various pin joint
rotational frequencies and applied loads. Figure 5 and 6 shows the variation in friction coefficient with
applied load and speed. The coefficient is virtually independent
The expected film thickness for normal operation of the pin is of the load; this suggests that the applied load is not changing
less than 1 micron, which is substantially less than the the lubrication regime. The hydrodynamic film calculations
combined roughness of the pin and bush surfaces, 7µm. presented in figure 2 indicates that over this load and speed
range the oil film thickness generated varies from 0.03 to

2 Copyright © 2007 by ASME

0.08 µm. This is significantly less than the roughness on the pin
and bush surface. For the whole load range considered in the
test the contact operates in the boundary regime and even at the
lower loads there is no significant film formed. The slight
increase at higher loads suggests that the joint is being pushed
into closer conformity with the bush resulting in an increase in
the contact area and a slight rise in friction.
An increase in pin rotational speed (figure 6) causes the friction
coefficient to reduce as a marginal oil film forms. Above
around 1 Hz no further friction reduction is seen, it is possible
that this is a starvation effect and the grease cannot replenish
the contact as the pin sweeps it out of the contact.
0.14
Figure 7. Location of an ultrasonic transducer in the loaded pin.
0.12

0.10 80.0
Coefficient of Friction

0.08 70.0

5 kN
0.06 20 kN
60.0
40 kN
60 kn Average
0.04

Contact pressure, MPa

50.0

0.02
40.0
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
30.0
Radial Load, kN

Figure 5. Variation of friction coefficient with applied pin load 20.0

for a joint rotational frequency of 0.033 Hz. 10.0

0.12

0.0
0.10 -90 -75 -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Angle (degrees)
Coefficient of Friction

0.08
Figure 7. Radial pressure distribution axially along the pin.
0.06

0.04 CONCLUSIONS
A novel hydraulic pin joint function test machine was designed
0.02
and constructed. This loaded and articulated the pin joint in a
0.00 controlled manner within the bushes. Hydrodynamic
0.01 0.1 1 10
calculations have shown that the oil film is thin for normal
Articulation frequency, Hz
operation of the joint and boundary lubrication is expected.
Figure 6. Variation of friction coefficient with pin rotational This is supported by torque measurements on the test rig which
frequency. indicated friction coefficients in the range 0.02 to 0.12. The
friction was largely independent of load but depended strongly
CONTACT STRESS on speed as more lubricant is entrained into the contact. An
An ultrasonic transducer was passed down through the hollow ultrasonic approach has been used to determine the
pin (figure 7 shows the test schematic). The reflection of the circumferential stress distribution between the pin and bush.
ultrasonic pulse can be used to estimate the contact stress The load is supported over approximately a 60° arc, regardless
between the bush and the pin. For details of the method see [2]. of the applied load. The distribution is closer to parabolic than
The transducer was scanned radially around a single pin/bush uniform within this arc. This data can be used to better design
contact. The tests were repeated for four different loads on the for the contact loading of the pin and bush.
pin. The pressure distributions are shown as figure 7.
The load is concentrated over an arc of 60 to 80° of the REFERENCES
circumference. The pressure clearly peaks at the position [1] Cameron, A (1966), Principles of Lubrication, Longmans,
directly opposite to the application of the load (0°). London.
[2] Dwyer-Joyce, R.S. and Drinkwater, B.W., (2004), “In-Situ
Measurement of Contact Area and Pressure Distribution in
Machine Elements”, Tribology Letters, Vol. 14, pp 41-52

3 Copyright © 2007 by ASME

View publication stats