Guidance On The Assessment of Dust From Demolition and Construction

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Institute of
Air Quality
Management
Guidance on the assessment of dust from

demolition and construction
www.iaqm.co.uk
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Contents
Acknowledgements 3
1. Introduction 4
2. Terminology 6
3. Background 8
4. Potential Impacts 9
5. Assessment Procedure 11
6. STEP 1: Screen the Need for a Detailed Assessment 13
7. STEP 2: Assess the Risk of Dust Impacts Arising 14
8. STEP 3: Site-specific Mitigation 23
9. STEP 4: Determine Significant Effects 28
10. STEP 5: Dust Assessment Report 29
11. Professional Judgement 30
Table 1: Example of the How the Dust Emission Magnitude for a Site Could be Presented 16
Table 2: Sensitivity of the Area to Dust Soiling Effects on People and Property 19
Table 3: Sensitivity of the Area to Human Health Impacts 20
Table 4: Sensitivity of the Area to Ecological Impacts 21
Table 5: Example of the Outcome of Defining the Sensitivity of the Area 21
Table 6: Risk of Dust Impacts - Demolition 21
Table 7: Risk of Dust Impacts - Earthworks 21
Table 8: Risk of Dust Impacts - Construction 22
Table 9: Risk of Dust Impacts - Trackout 22
Table 10: Example of a Summary Dust Risk Table to Define Site-Specific Mitigation 23
Figure 1: Steps to Perform a Dust Assessment 12

Figure 2: Responsibilities for Dust Mitigation from Demolition and Construction sites 23
Box 1: Screening Criteria 13

Box 2: Technical Competency of Assessor 14
Box 3: Crushing and Screening 15
Box 4: Concrete Batching Plant 15
Box 5: Importance of Dust Raised by Vehicles 15
Box 6: Sensitivities of People to Dust Soiling Effects 16
Box 7: Sensitivities of People to the Health Effects of PM10 23
Box 8: Sensitivities of Receptors to Ecological Effects 24
Box 9: Additional Factors to Consider when Determining the Sensitivity of the Area 25
2
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements: This guidance was produced as a result of About the Institute of Air Quality Management (IAQM):
the voluntary contribution of the members of a Working Group, The IAQM aims to be the authoritative voice for air quality by
for which IAQM is very grateful. This guidance represents the maintaining, enhancing and promoting the highest standards
views of the IAQM and not necessarily the individual members of working practices in the field and for the professional
of the working group. development of those who undertake this work. Membership of
IAQM is mainly drawn from practicing air quality professionals
Chair of the working group working within the fields of air quality science, air quality
Dr Claire Holman, Brook Cottage Consultants assessment and air quality management.
Members Front cover photo: Hannah Dalton

Roger Barrowcliffe, Clear Air Thinking
Daniel Birkenshaw, Golder Associates Copyright statement: Copyright of these materials is held
Hannah Dalton, Ramboll by IAQM. We encourage the use of the materials but request
Dr Garry Gray, URS that acknowledgement of the source is explicitly stated.
Graham Harker, Peter Brett Associates LLP Contact: IAQM
Prof. Duncan Laxen, Air Quality Consultants c/o Institution of Environmental Sciences
Dr Ben Marner, Air Quality Consultants 34 Grosvenor Gardens
Daniel Marsh, Kings College London London, SW1W 0DH
Fiona Prismall, RPS Planning & Development
Dr Jon Pullen, RPS Planning & Development T: +44 (0)20 7730 5516
Matthew Stoaling, SLR Consulting Ltd E: [email protected]
Catherine Storey, Independent Environmental Consultant
Lesley Vining, ENVIRON UK Date: February 2014
Graphic Design: Darren Walker (darrengraphidesign.com)

This document is available for download from the IAQM
Suggested citatation: Holman et al (2014). IAQM Guidance website (iaqm.co.uk) together with examples of the use of
on the assessment of dust from demolition and contstruction, the guidance. Please go to IAQM Guidance. Comments
Institute of Air Quality Management, London. www.iaqm.co.uk/ should be sent to [email protected].
text/guidance/construction-dust-2014.pdf.
IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 3

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
1. Introduction
Emissions of dust to air can occur during the preparation of the In Environmental Statements (ESs) and Air Quality Assessments
land (e.g. demolition, land clearing, and earth moving), and during the terms ‘impacts’ and ‘effects’ are often used interchangeably.
construction. Emissions can vary substantially from day to day, In this document the term ‘impact’ has been used to describe
depending on the level of activity, the specific operations being a change in concentration or dust deposition and ‘effect’ to
undertaken, and the weather conditions. A large proportion of describe the consequences of any impacts.
the emissions result from site plant and road vehicles moving
over temporary roads and open ground. If mud is allowed to The operational phases of minerals (and some waste) sites share
get onto local roads, dust emissions can occur at some distance some common features with construction activities; however,
from the originating site. The scale of these impacts depends minerals sites can be of a significantly larger scale. A qualitative
on the dust suppression and other mitigation measures applied. dust assessment for a minerals site would therefore normally
be expected to be at least as rigorous as one carried out in
In terms of effects, construction sites can give rise to annoyance accordance with the IAQM construction dust method, reflecting
due to the soiling of surfaces by dust. Very high levels of soiling the potential for minerals sites to have a greater impact than
can also damage plants and affect the diversity of ecosystems. construction sites. The underlying Source-Pathway-Receptor
Additionally, there is evidence of major construction sites concept used in the IAQM construction dust method is applicable
increasing long term particulate matter (PM10) concentrations1 to a wide range of applications, including minerals developments;
and the number of days2 when PM10 concentrations exceed 50µg/m3, however, the detailed guidance in this document (particularly
the daily limit value for this pollutant. Exposure to PM10 has long on source strength and pathway distances) is specifically for
been associated with a range of health effects3 . construction and demolition and cannot be used, without
appropriate modification, for other activities. Notwithstanding
Local planning authorities often require the air quality impacts this, and in the current absence of other detailed guidance, the
of new developments to be assessed as part of the decision IAQM construction dust method can be taken as a starting
making process4, either as a standalone document or as part of a point for a minerals dust assessment provided it is used with
wider Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The latter requires appropriate modifications to the various terms and factors;
both the construction and operational phases of developments some aspects of this guidance, such as the assessment of dust
to be considered, and as a result many stand-alone air quality from earthworks and track-out, may be applicable with only
assessments also consider the impacts of both phases of new minor adjustments. It is the intention of the IAQM to produce
developments. In London the Mayor has recently introduced separate guidance on the assessment of the impact of mineral
a requirement for construction impact assessments for major and waste sites at a future date.
developments5 .
This guidance is aimed primarily for use in the UK, where the
This document is designed to provide guidance for developers, vast majority of IAQM members work. However, it is recognised
their consultants and environmental health practitioners on that the membership of IAQM is international and that the
how to undertake a construction impact assessment (including guidance may be applied elsewhere. Where this occurs careful
demolition and earthworks as appropriate). The construction consideration should to be given to its applicability where
impact assessment may be a standalone document (possibly there are different climates, construction working practices
including other environmental impacts such as noise) or and statutory assessment criteria.
incorporated into an Air Quality Assessment or EIA.
As stated above, the emphasis has been on classifying demolition
The impacts depend on the mitigation measures adopted. and construction sites according to the risk of impacts, to identify
Therefore the emphasis in this document is on classifying the mitigation measures appropriate to the risk. It is anticipated that
risk of dust impacts from a site, which will then allow mitigation with the implementation of effective site-specific mitigation
measures commensurate with that risk to be identified. measures the environmental effect will not be significant in most
4
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
cases. Nonetheless a robust assessment of the dust impact risk  Photo credit: Daniel Marsh
is necessary (and is described here) in order to determine the
level of site-specific mitigation that should be applied.
This guidance represents an update of the 2012 IAQM

publication6 . The guidance will continue to be updated
as knowledge regarding its use expands and as a result
of legislative or other requirements. The user should
therefore check the IAQM website (www.iaqm.co.uk) to
ensure that the latest guidance is being followed.
1
Stuart Upton and Vina Kukadia, 2004, Measurements of air
pollution emissions from a construction site: a case study,
Report for Greater London Authority, BRE Environment,
Watford.
Air Quality Expert Group (AQEG), 2005, Particulate Matter in
the UK, Section 6.3.6 Construction Activities.
2
Gary D Fuller and David Green, 2004, The impact of local
fugitive PM10 emissions from building works and road works
on the assessment of the European Union limit value, Atmos-
pheric Environment, 38, 4993-5002. 3 There is evidence that
short-term exposure to coarse particles i.e. those between
PM10 and PM2.5, typically associated with demolition and con-
struction activities, including crustal material, are associated
with adverse respiratory and cardiovascular effects on health
(World Health Organization, REVIHAAP Project: Technical
Report, 2013, www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-top-
ics/environment-and-health/air-quality/publications/2013/
review-of-evidence-on-health-aspects-of-air-pollution-
revihaap-project-final-technical-report). 4 For example, the
National Planning Practice Guidance for England (Beta Ver-
sion) includes air quality as a relevant considered in planning
decisions and specifically includes “significant impact (such as
dust) during construction for nearby sensitive locations”.

5
Mayor of London, 2013, Sustainable Design and Construction
Special Planning Guidance, Draft.
6
IAQM, 2012, Guidance on the assessment of the impacts of
construction on air quality and the determination of their
significance.

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
2. Terminology
The construction impact assessments reviewed by IAQM identified the use of a range of different terminology, often with different
meanings. This section aims to provide some definitions to help ensure consistency between the dust impact assessments
produced by different organisations.
Annoyance (dust) Loss of amenity due to dust deposition or visible dust plumes, often related to people making
complaints, but not necessarily sufficient to be a legal nuisance.
AQMA Air Quality Management Area, declared by a local authority where its review and assessment of air
quality shows that an air quality objective is likely to be exceeded.
Construction Any activity involved with the provision of a new structure (or structures), its modification or re-
furbishment. A structure will include a residential dwelling, office building, retail outlet, road, etc.
Construction An assessment of the impacts of demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout. In this
Impact Assessment Guidance, specifically the air quality impacts.
Demolition Any activity involved with the removal of an existing structure (or structures). This may also be
referred to as de-construction, specifically when a building is to be removed a small part at a time.
Deposited Dust Dust that is no longer in the air and which has settled onto a surface. Deposited dust is also some-
times called amenity dust or nuisance dust, with the term nuisance applied in the general sense
rather than the specific legal definition.
DMP Dust Management Plan; a document that describes the site-specific methods to be used to control
dust emissions.
Dust Solid particles that are suspended in air, or have settled out onto a surface after having been sus-
pended in air. The terms dust and particulate matter (PM) are often used interchangeably, although
in some contexts one term tends to be used in preference to the other. In this guidance the term
‘dust’ has been used to include the particles that give rise to soiling, and to human health and
ecological effects. Note: this is different to the definition given in BS 6069, where dust refers to
particles up to 75µm in diameter.
Earthworks Covers the processes of soil-stripping, ground-levelling, excavation and landscaping.
Effects The consequences of the changes in airborne concentrations and/or dust deposition for a
receptor. These might manifest as annoyance due to soiling, increased morbidity or mortality due
to exposure to PM10 or PM2.5 or plant dieback due to reduced photosynthesis. The term ‘significant
effect’ has a specific meaning in EIA regulations. The opposite is an insignificant effect. In the
context of construction impacts any effect will usually be adverse, however, professional judge-
ment is required to determine whether this adverse effect is significant based on the evidence
presented. There is further discussion of this in Section 10 of this document.
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment, as required by The Town and Country Planning (Environmental
Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011; The Town and Country Planning
(Environmental Impact Assessment (Scotland) Regulations 2011; and The Planning (Environmental
Impact Assessment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) as may be amended from time to time having
regard to the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (85/337/EEC) (as amended).
ES Environmental Statement, the document that reports the work undertaken for EIA.
HDV Heavy duty vehicles defined as vehicles with a gross weight greater than 3.5 tonnes.
Impacts The changes in airborne concentrations and/or dust deposition. A scheme can have an ‘impact’ on
airborne dust without having any ‘effects’, for instance if there are no receptors to experience the
impact.
NRMM Non-road mobile machinery, in this context the plant used for demolition and construction
activities, e.g. diggers. 
6
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Nuisance The term nuisance dust is often used in a general sense when describing amenity dust. However,
this term also has specific meanings in environmental law:
(a) Statutory nuisance, as defined in S79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as amended
from time to time).
(b) Private nuisance, arising from substantial interference with a person’s enjoyment and use of his
land.
(c) Public nuisance, arising from an act or omission that obstructs, damages or inconveniences the
rights of the community.
Each of these applying in so far as the nuisance relates to the unacceptable effects of emissions.
It is recognised that a significant loss of amenity may occur at lower levels of emission than would
constitute a statutory nuisance.
Note: as nuisance has a specific meaning in environmental law, and to avoid confusion, it is
recommended that the term is not used in a more general sense
PM Abbreviation for particulate matter suspended in the air. PM10 is airborne particulate matter with
an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns (µm); PM2.5 is less than 2.5µm.
Receptor A location that may be affected by dust emissions during demolition and construction. Human receptors
include locations where people spend time and where property may be impacted by dust. Ecological
receptors are habitats that might be sensitive to dust. See Section 4.2.
Risk The likelihood of an adverse event occurring.
Trackout The transport of dust and dirt from the construction / demolition site onto the public road net-
work, where it may be deposited and then re-suspended by vehicles using the network. This arises
when heavy duty vehicles (HDVs) leave the construction / demolition site with dusty materials,
which may then spill onto the road, and/or when HDVs transfer dust and dirt onto the road having
travelled over muddy ground on site.

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
3. Background
At the end of 2009 IAQM produced its Position on the Description
of Air Quality Impacts and the Assessment of their Significance.
This provides guidance for defining the significance of an air
quality impact arising from the operation of a new development,
based on the magnitude of change (i.e. the increase or decrease in
predicted concentrations as a result of a proposed development)
and the sensitivity of the receptors (i.e. the air quality in the
area with respect to the air quality objectives). This guidance
was incorporated into Development Control: Planning for Air
Quality (2010 Update), published by Environmental Protection
UK (EPUK), and has been widely used by air quality professionals
across the country. A review of this guidance was initiated in
2013, jointly with EPUK.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requires the consideration

of any impacts associated with the demolition / construction
phases of a proposed development. Assessment of impacts
associated with construction and demolition is also frequently
required for planning purposes outside of the formal EIA process.
The Building Research Establishment (BRE) undertook research,

in association with the construction industry, to investigate
the efficacy of dust mitigation measures, which resulted in BRE
guidance being published in 20037.
In 2006 the Greater London Authority (GLA) with the London

Councils produced The Control of Dust and Emissions from
Construction and Demolition: Best Practice Guidance, with the
assistance of BRE and others. The Mayor of London committed
to updating this guidance in his 2010 Air Quality Strategy, and a
revised version is due to be published in 2014.
In the development of this IAQM guidance there has been much

debate over the evidence for the numbers used to define the
risk categories. Given the state of knowledge these can only
be indicative at the current time. In particular, the evidence on
the distance over which impacts may occur is limited. Extensive
monitoring of PM10 around construction sites has occurred since
the GLA Best Practice Guidance was first published. However,
there has been little or no attempt to pull this information
together. It is often collected on a site by site basis, by developers
who have no direct interest in extending the knowledge base
by publishing the findings.
The original guidance, published in January 2012, has been updated

to reflect experience of its use. It is anticipated that further
updates will be required in the future as the evidence base
develops.
7
Vina Kukadia, Stuart Upton, David Hall, 2003, Control of Dust
from Construction and Demolition Activities, BRE.  Photo credit: Roger Barrowcliffe
8
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
4. Potential Impacts
4.1 Introduction property may experience the adverse effects of airborne dust
The main air quality impacts that may arise during demolition or dust soiling10, or exposure to PM10 over a time period relevant
and construction activities are: to the air quality objectives, as defined in the Government’s
technical guidance for Local Air Quality Management 11 . In terms
1. dust deposition, resulting in the soiling of surfaces; of annoyance effects, this will most commonly relate to dwellings,
but may also refer to other premises such as buildings housing
2. visible dust plumes, which are evidence of dust emissions;
cultural heritage collections (e.g. museums and galleries), vehicle
3. elevated PM10 concentrations, as a result of dust generating showrooms, food manufacturers, electronics manufacturers,
activities on site; and amenity areas and horticultural operations (e.g. salad or soft-fruit
production). Care should be taken to ensure that the assessment
4. an increase in concentrations of airborne particles and takes into account whether exposure will arise in practice (e.g.
nitrogen dioxide due to exhaust emissions from diesel computer chip manufacture is sensitive to dust and so premises
powered vehicles and equipment used on site (non-road are likely to have extensive dust filtering equipment and exposure
mobile machinery) and vehicles accessing the site8 . may therefore not be increased).
The most common impacts are dust soiling and increased An ‘ecological receptor’ refers to any sensitive habitat affected by
ambient PM10 concentrations due to dust arising from activities dust soiling. This includes the direct impacts on vegetation12 or
on the site. Dust soiling will arise from the deposition of dust in aquatic ecosystems of dust deposition, and the indirect impacts
all size fractions. The ambient dust relevant to health outcomes on fauna (e.g. on foraging habitats). For locations with a statutory
will be that measured as PM10, although most of this will be in the designation, e.g. Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Sites of
coarse (PM2.5-10) fraction, rather than the PM2.5 fraction. Research Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), consideration should be given
undertaken in the USA9 suggests that 85% to 90% by weight of as to whether the particular site is sensitive to dust and this will
the fugitive dust emissions of PM10 from construction sites are depend on why it has been designated. Some non-statutory
PM2.5-10 and 10% to 15% are in the PM2.5 fraction. sites (i.e. local wildlife sites) and/or locations with very specific
sensitivities may also be considered if appropriate. The inclusion
There are other potential impacts, such as the release of heavy or exclusion of sites should be justified in the assessment.
metals, asbestos fibres or other pollutants during the demolition
of certain buildings, such as former chemical works, or the Dust from demolition and construction sites deposited on
removal of contaminated soils. The release of certain fungal vegetation may create ecological stress within the local plant
spores during the demolition of old buildings can also give community. During long dry periods dust can coat plant foliage
rise to specific concerns if immune-compromised people are adversely affecting photosynthesis and other biological functions.
likely to be exposed, for example close to an oncology unit of Rainfall removes the deposited dust from foliage and can rapidly
a hospital. These issues need to be considered on a site by site leach chemicals into the soil. Plant communities near short-term
basis, and are not covered by this Guidance. works are likely to recover within a year of the dust soiling stress
ceasing. However, large scale construction sites may give rise to
Experience of assessing the exhaust emissions from on-site dust deposition over an extended period of time and adversely
plant (also known as non-road mobile machinery or NRMM) and affect vascular plants. For example cement dust deposited
site traffic suggests that they are unlikely to make a significant on leaves can increase the surface alkalinity, which in turn can
impact on local air quality, and in the vast majority of cases they hydrolyse lipid and wax components, penetrate the cuticle, and
will not need to be quantitatively assessed. For site plant and denature proteins, finally causing the leaf to wilt 13 .
on-site traffic, consideration should be given to the number of
plant/vehicles and their operating hours and locations to assess Limestone dust coating of lichen has been shown to damage its
whether a significant effect is likely to occur. For site traffic photosynthetic apparatus14. These types of damage over a long
on the public highway, if it cannot be scoped out (for example period have the potential to change plant community structure
by using the EPUK’s criteria), then it should be assessed using and function. Noticeable effects include the increase in ruderal
the same methodology and significance criteria as operational and pioneer plant communities.
traffic impacts. The impacts of exhaust emissions from on-site
plant and site traffic are not considered further in this Guidance. The sensitivity of specific human and ecological receptors is
discussed in Section 7.3.
4.2 Receptors
A ‘human receptor’, refers to any location where a person or

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
4.3 Risk of Dust Emissions take place during a particular season (with this enforced through
The risk of dust emissions from a demolition/construction site a planning condition, for example), consideration could be given
causing loss of amenity and/or health or ecological impacts is to using seasonal wind and rainfall data. This type of guarantee
related to: is not usual because the start of construction depends on many
• the activities being undertaken (demolition, number of factors.
vehicles and plant etc.);
Local conditions also need to be accounted for. Topography
• the duration of these activities;
and natural barriers (e.g. woodland) will reduce airborne
• the size of the site;
concentrations due to impaction. In addition, if the locality
• the meteorological conditions (wind speed, direction and
has a history of dust generating activities, such as quarrying, a
rainfall);
given level of additional dust may be more acceptable, i.e. more
• the proximity of receptors to the activities;
readily tolerated, than in a suburban residential area. Alternatively,
• the adequacy of the mitigation measures applied to reduce
impacts may be less acceptable, where nearby residents have
or eliminate dust; and
become sensitised to dust, have a history of complaining and may
• the sensitivity of the receptors to dust.
therefore be more likely to complain about a new dust source.
Similarly, in rural areas agricultural activities may generate dust
The quantity of dust emitted from construction operations will
and this should be taken into account in the assessment of risk.
be related to the area of land being worked, and the level of
construction activity (nature, magnitude and duration). Emissions For PM10, Defra’s background concentrations and/or any local
from construction vehicles passing over unpaved ground can be monitoring and modelling data can be used to determine whether
particularly important. These will be related to the silt content of the 24-hour mean objective is likely to be exceeded as a result of
the soil (defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency as the construction activities. The risk of PM10 exceedences will be
particles smaller than 75 micrometres [µm] in diameter), as well greatest at receptors very close to the site boundary, especially
as the speed and weight of the vehicle, the soil moisture content, if combined with PM10 from a major road, or other source.
the distance covered and the frequency of vehicle movements.
The wind direction, wind speed and rainfall, at the time when a
construction activity is taking place, will also influence whether
there is likely to be a dust impact. Due to the variability of the
weather, it is impossible to predict what the weather conditions
will be when specific construction activities are being undertaken.
Local wind speed and direction influences the dispersion of dust.

This will depend on the frequency that the receptor is downwind
and the distance of the receptors from the construction activities. 8
In the UK the maximum permitted sulphur content of fuels used
Higher wind speeds will result in the highest potential for release in road and off-road applications is 10 ppm, and therefore sulphur
of dust from a site. Buildings, structures and trees can also dioxide is no longer a significant pollutant from these sources.
influence dispersion. 9
Background Document for Revisions to Fine Fraction Ratios Used
Adverse impacts can occur in any direction from a site. They are, for AP-42 Fugitive Dust Emission Factors Prepared by Midwest
however, more likely to occur downwind of the prevailing wind Research Institute (Chatten Cowherd, MRI Project Leader), For
direction and/or close to the site. It should be noted that the Western Governors’ Association Western Regional Air Partnership
‘prevailing’ wind direction is usually the most frequent direction (WRAP), MRI Project No. 110397, Finalized November 1, 2006.
10
over a long period such as a year; whereas construction activity Occupational settings are relevant in terms of annoyance effects.
11
may occur over a period of weeks or months during which the Local Air Quality Management Technical Guidance LAQM.
most frequent wind direction might be quite different. The most TG(09), Defra, February 2009.
12
frequent wind direction may also not be the direction from A Farmer, 1993, The Effects of Dust on Vegetation - A Review,
which the wind speeds are highest. The use of the prevailing Environmental Pollution 79, 63-75.
13
wind direction in the assessment of risk is most useful, therefore, Guderian R. 1986. Terrestrial ecosystems: particulate deposition.
for construction projects of long duration. In: Air Pollutants and Their Effects on the Terrestrial Ecosystem
(Legge AH, Krupa SV, eds). Advances in Environmental Science
Dust impacts are more likely to occur during drier periods, as and Technology, Vol. 18. 339-363, Wiley, New York, USA.
14
rainfall acts as a natural dust suppressant. Arianoutsou M, Lanaras T, Zaharopoulou A. 1993. Influence of
dust from a limestone quarry on chlorophyll degradation of the
Impacts during the summer and winter months are generally lichen Physcia adscendens (Fr.) Oliv. Bulletin of Environmental
different, and if it can be guaranteed that the construction will Contaminants and Toxicology, 50: 852–855.
10
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
5. Assessment Procedure
This guidance provides a framework for the assessment of risk. Risks are described in terms of there being a low, medium or
Every site is different and therefore this guidance cannot be high risk of dust impacts for each of the four separate potential
too prescriptive and professional judgement is required (see activities. Where there are low, medium or high risks of an impact,
Section 11). Any judgements must be fully auditable in the dust then site-specific mitigation will be required, proportionate to
assessment report, with the source(s) defined and choice of the level of risk.
dust risk category justified for each activity (see below). Where
justification cannot be given, a precautionary approach must be Based on the threshold criteria and professional judgement one
taken and the highest level of mitigation recommended. or more of the groups of activities may be assigned a ‘negligible’
risk. Such cases could arise, for example, because the scale is very
Activities on construction sites have been divided into four types small and there are no receptors near to the activity.
to reflect their different potential impacts. These are:
STEP 3 is to determine the site-specific mitigation for each of
• demolition; the four potential activities in STEP 2. This will be based on the
• earthworks; risk of dust impacts identified in STEP 2. Where a local authority
• construction; and has issued guidance on measures to be adopted at demolition
• trackout. / construction sites, these should also be taken into account.
The potential for dust emissions is assessed for each activity STEP 4 is to examine the residual effects and to determine
that is likely to take place. Obviously, if an activity is not taking whether or not these are significant.
place, e.g. demolition, then it does not need to be assessed.
STEP 5 is to prepare the dust assessment report.
The assessment methodology considers three separate dust
impacts:
• annoyance due to dust soiling;

• the risk of health effects due to an increase in exposure
to PM10; and
• harm to ecological receptors
with account being taken of the sensitivity of the area that may
experience these effects.
The assessment is used to define appropriate mitigation

measures15 to ensure that there will be no significant effect.
The assessment steps are summarised below and in Figure 1.
STEP 1 is to screen the requirement for a more detailed  Photo credit: Hannah Dalton
assessment.
15
No further assessment is required if there are no receptors There is little legislation that explicitly seeks to control dust
within a certain distance of the works. emissions from construction sites. Certain equipment/processes
on construction sites are controlled under The Environmental
STEP 2 is to assess the risk of dust impacts. This is done Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010, and equivalent
separately for each of the four activities (demolition; earthworks; legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Dust is controlled
construction; and trackout) and takes account of: indirectly, through the duty of care provisions for waste under
Part 11, Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA) (applicable to
• the scale and nature of the works, which determines the
England, Wales and Scotland) with respect to the transport
potential dust emission magnitude (STEP 2A); and
of waste materials. Part III of the EPA includes provisions for
• the sensitivity of the area (STEP 2B).
Statutory Nuisance (see Section 2 on Terminology). Exhaust
emission from road vehicles and non-road mobile machinery
These factors are combined in STEP 2C to give the risk of dust
(NRMM) are controlled through European Directives.
impacts.

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Figure 1: Steps to Perform a Dust Assessment
Report
Step 1 No Report that no significant
Screen the need for a effect is likely
detailed assement
Yes
Step 2
Assess the risk of dust impacts separately for:
· demolition · earthworks · construction · trackout
Step 2A Step 2A
Define potential dust Define sensitivity
emission magnitude of the area
Step 2C
Define the risk of impacts
Step 3
Site-specific mitigation
Step 4 Report
Determine significant effects
°° Assessment approach
°° information used
°° Risk identified
°° Mitigation required
Step 5 °° Signifcance of ef-
Dust Assessement Report fects
12
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
6. STEP 1: Screen the Need for a Detailed Assessment

This step is deliberately chosen to be conservative, and will require
Box 1: Screening Criteria assessments for most schemes. The distances cited here, and in
subsequent sections, take account of the exponential decline
An assessment will normally be required where there is:
in both airborne concentrations and the rate of deposition
• a ‘human receptor’ within:
with distance, as well as practical experience of members of
- 350 m of the boundary of the site; or
the Working Group.
- 50 m of the route(s) used by construction
vehicles on the public highway, up to 500 m Where the need for a more detailed assessment is screened out,
from the site entrance(s). it can be concluded that the level of risk is “negligible”, and any
• an ‘ecological receptor’ within: effects will be not be significant.
- 50 m of the boundary of the site; or
- 50 m of the route(s) used by construction vehicles
on the public highway, up to 500 m from the site
entrance(s).
 Photo credit: Roger Barrowcliffe

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
7. STEP 2: Assess the Risk of Dust Impacts

7.1 Introduction Every site is different in terms of timing (seasonality), building
The risk of dust arising in sufficient quantities to cause annoyance type (construction materials), duration and scale (area, volume
and/or health and/or ecological impacts should be determined and height), and therefore professional judgement must be
using four risk categories: negligible, low, medium and high risk. applied by a technically competent assessor (see Box 2) when
A site is allocated to a risk category based on two factors: allocating activities into one of the three potential dust emission
magnitude categories. Justification of the category used must
• the scale and nature of the works, which determines the be stated in the report. Where there is doubt, the higher risk
potential dust emission magnitude as small, medium or category should be applied (e.g. if the site is assessed as low/
large (STEP 2A); and medium then mitigation appropriate to a medium site should
be applied). Further information on professional judgement is
• the sensitivity of the area to dust impacts (STEP 2B), which provided in Section 11.
is defined as low, medium or high sensitivity .
7.2 STEP 2A - Define the Potential Dust Emission Magnitude
These two factors are combined in STEP 2C to determine the The dust emission magnitude is based on the scale of the
risk of dust impacts with no mitigation applied. The risk category anticipated works and should be classified as Small, Medium,
assigned to the site can be different for each of the four potential or Large.
activities (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout).
The following are examples of how the potential dust emission
More than one of these activities may occur on a site at any
magnitude for different activities can be defined. Note that,
one time.
in each case, not all the criteria need to be met, and that other
Where appropriate, the site can be divided into ‘zones’ for the criteria may be used if justified in the assessment:
dust risk assessment. This may result in different mitigation levels
Demolition: Example definitions for demolition are:
being applied to each zone. This could be where different parts
• Large: Total building volume >50,000 m3, potentially dusty
of a large site are different distances from the nearest receptors,
construction material (e.g. concrete), on-site crushing and
or where development activities move away from a receptor
screening, demolition activities >20 m above ground level;
through time on a large scheme.
• Medium: Total building volume 20,000 m3 – 50,000 m3,
However, on complex sites where activities are not easily
potentially dusty construction material, demolition activities
segregated the mitigation appropriate for the highest risk
10-20 m above ground level; and
category should be applied. The aim is to ensure that it is clear
what mitigation is supposed to be implemented on a site and • Small: Total building volume <20,000 m3, construction
to make auditing this simpler. material with low potential for dust release (e.g. metal
cladding or timber), demolition activities <10m above ground,
demolition during wetter months.
Box 2: Technical Competency of Assessor
Earthworks: Earthworks will primarily involve excavating material,
The following risk assessment procedure requires haulage, tipping and stockpiling. This may also involve levelling
‘professional judgement’. Those who are responsible the site and landscaping. Example definitions for earthworks are:
for making this judgement must be able to demonstrate • Large: Total site area >10,000 m2, potentially dusty soil type
technical competency in the assessment of dust impacts. It (e.g. clay, which will be prone to suspension when dry due
is difficult to define precisely who has sufficient experience to small particle size), >10 heavy earth moving vehicles active
and expertise to make reasonable judgements, but, a person at any one time, formation of bunds >8 m in height, total
with full Membership of IAQM and experience of assessing material moved >100,000 tonnes;
dust impacts for a minimum of 10 diverse projects, including
some complex multi-phase projects and similar projects to • Medium: Total site area 2,500 m2 – 10,000 m2, moderately
that being assessed, is likely to be technically competent. dusty soil type (e.g. silt), 5-10 heavy earth moving vehicles
active at any one time, formation of bunds 4 m - 8 m in
IAQM is the only professional body specifically for air height, total material moved 20,000 tonnes – 100,000
quality practitioners in the UK, although there are a number tonnes; and
of more general environmental professional bodies, whose
members may be competent. • Small: Total site area <2 ,500 m2, soil type with large grain
size (e.g. sand), <5 heavy earth moving vehicles active at any
14
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Box 3: Crushing and Screening Box 4: Concrete Batching Plant
Mobile crushing equipment can be a significant source of Concrete batching equipment is regulated by District
dust associated with the demolition phase. This equipment Councils or Unitary Authorities in England and Wales,
is regulated by District Councils or Unitary Authorities in SEPA in Scotland and District Councils in Northern Ireland
England and Wales, SEPA in Scotland and District Councils under the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010 and
in Northern Ireland, under the Environmental Permitting equivalent legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Regulations 2010 in England and Wales, and equivalent
legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Such equipment should be operated in accordance with the
latest version of Process Guidance Note 3/1 on Guidance
Equipment should be designed and operated in accordance for Blending, Packing, Loading, Unloading and Use of Bulk
with the most recent version of Process Guidance Note Cement.
3/16 for Mobile Crushing and Screening (note this is under
review). Professional judgement will be required to determine how
the use of concrete batching equipment will affect the dust
Professional judgement will be required to determine emission magnitude. For example, it may be appropriate
how the use of crushing and screening equipment will to increase the dust emission magnitude by one or more
affect the dust emission magnitude. For example, it may classes.
be appropriate to increase the dust emission magnitude
by one or more classes.
one time, formation of bunds <4 m in height, total material day17, surface material with low potential for dust release,
moved <20,000 tonnes, earthworks during wetter months. unpaved road length <50 m.
Construction: The key issues when determining the potential These numbers are for vehicles that leave the site after moving
dust emission magnitude during the construction phase include over unpaved ground, where they will accumulate mud and dirt
the size of the building(s)/infrastructure, method of construction, that can be tracked out onto the public highway.
construction materials, and duration of build. Example definitions
for construction are:
• Large: Total building volume >100, 000 m3, on site concrete 16
A vehicle movement is a one way journey. i.e. from A to B,
batching, sandblasting;
and excludes the return journey.
17
• Medium: Total building volume 25,000 m3 – 100,000 m3, HDV movements during a construction project vary over its
potentially dusty construction material (e.g. concrete), on lifetime, and the number of movements is the maximum not
site concrete batching; and the average.
• Small: Total building volume <25,000 m3, construction

material with low potential for dust release (e.g. metal
cladding or timber). Box 5: Importance of Dust Raised by Vehicles
Trackout: Factors which determine the dust emission magnitude Researcha carried out in the United States, has shown that
are vehicle size, vehicle speed, vehicle numbers, geology and haul trucks generate the majority of dust emissions from
duration. As with all other potential sources, professional surface mining sites, accounting for an estimated 78%-97%
judgement must be applied when classifying trackout into one of total dust emissions. Vehicles using unpaved haul roads
of the dust emission magnitude categories. Example definitions in UK construction sites will lead to the release of dust via
for trackout are: the same mechanical processes (i.e. re-suspension) and are
• Large: >50 HDV (>3.5t) outward movements16 in any one day17, likely to be a dominant source. Emissions will also arise
potentially dusty surface material (e.g. high clay content), from vehicles travelling over any unpaved ground on a
unpaved road length >100 m; construction site.
• Medium: 10-50 HDV (>3.5t) outward movements16 in any a

W.R and J.A.Organiscak, undated, Evaluation of dust
one day17, moderately dusty surface material (e.g. high clay exposure to truck drivers following the lead haul truck,
content), unpaved road length 50 m – 100 m; and NIOSH, www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/
pdfs/eodet.pdf
• Small: <10 HDV (>3.5t) outward movements16 in any one

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
It may be useful to set out the dust emission magnitude for each activity as shown in the example in Table 1.
Activity Dust Emission Magnitude

Demolition Large
Earthworks Large
Construction Medium
Trackout Small
7.3 Step 2B - Define the Sensitivity of the Area In all cases the specific circumstances should be taken into
The sensitivity of the area takes account of a number of factors: account and may mean that on occasion the examples given
will be subject to exceptions. For instance, the first occupants
• the specific sensitivities of receptors in the area; moving into residential dwellings on a large phased housing
• the proximity and number of those receptors; development, may reasonably be expected to be less sensitive
• in the case of PM10, the local background concentration; and to dust soiling effects (albeit for a limited time) than other
• site-specific factors, such as whether there are natural residential receptors. Box 9 contains additional factors that may
shelters, such as trees, to reduce the risk of wind-blown dust. need to be taken into account.
The type of receptors at different distances from the site

boundary or, if known, from the dust generating activities,
should be included. Consideration also should be given to the
number of ‘human receptors’. Exact counting of the number of
‘human receptors’, is not required. Instead it is recommended
that judgement is used to determine the approximate number Box 6: Sensitivities of People to Dust Soiling Effects
of receptors (a residential unit is one receptor) within each
distance band. For receptors which are not dwellings professional For the sensitivity of people and their property to soiling,
judgement should be used to determine the number of human the IAQM recommends that the air quality practitioner
receptors for use in the tables, for example a school is likely to uses professional judgement to identify where on the
be treated as being in the >100 receptor category. spectrum between high and low sensitivity a receptor
lies, taking into account the following general principles:
The likely routes the construction traffic will use should also
be included to enable the presence of trackout receptors to High sensitivity receptor – surrounding land where:
be included in the assessment. As general guidance, without • users can reasonably expect enjoyment of a high level
site-specific mitigation, trackout may occur along the public of amenity; or
highway up to 500 m from large sites (as defined in STEP 2A),
200 m from medium sites and 50 m from small sites, as measured • the appearance, aesthetics or value of their property
from the site exit. would be diminished by soiling; and
A number of attempts have been made to categorise receptors • the people or property would reasonably be expected
into high, medium and low sensitivity categories; however, there to be present continuously, or at least regularly for
is no unified sensitivity classification scheme that covers the extended periods, as part of the normal pattern of
quite different potential effects on property, human health and use of the land.
ecological receptors.
• indicative examples include dwellings, museums
A series of boxes provide guidance on the sensitivity of different andother culturally important collections, medium
types of receptor to dust soiling (Box 6), health effects (Box 7) andlong term car parksb and car showrooms. ►
and ecological effects (Box 8).
16
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Medium sensitivity receptor Box 7: Sensitivities of People to the Health Effects of PM10
• users would expecta to enjoy a reasonable level of
amenity, but would not reasonably expecta to enjoy For the sensitivity of people to the health effects of PM10,
the same level of amenity as in their home; or the IAQM recommends that the air quality practitioner
assumes that there are three sensitivities based on whether
• the appearance, aesthetics or value of their property or not the receptor is likely to be exposed to elevated
could be diminished by soiling; or concentrations over a 24-hour period, consistent with
the Defra’s advice for local air quality management (Defra.
• the people or property wouldn’t reasonably be 2009, LAQM Technical Guidance LAQM.TG(O9).
expecteda to be present here continuously or regularly
for extended periods as part of the normal pattern High sensitivity receptor
of use of the land. • locations where members of the public are exposed
over a time period relevant to the air quality objective
• indicative examples include parks and places of work. for PM10 (in the case of the 24-hour objectives, a
Low sensitivity receptor relevant location would be one where individuals may
• the enjoyment of amenity would not reasonably be be exposed for eight hours or more in a day).a
expecteda; or • Indicative examples include residential properties.
• property would not reasonably be expected to be a Hospitals, schools and residential care homes should
diminished in appearance, aesthetics or value by also be considered as having equal sensitivity to
soiling; or residential areas for the purposes of this assessment.
• there is transient exposure, where the people or Medium sensitivity receptor

property would reasonably be expected to be present • locations where the people exposed are workersb, and
only for limited periods of time as part of the normal exposure is over a time period relevant to the air quality
pattern of use of the land. objective for PM10 (in the case of the 24-hour objectives,
a relevant location would be one where individuals may
• indicative examples include playing fields, farmland be exposed for eight hours or more in a day).
(unless commercially-sensitive horticultural),
footpaths, short term car parksb and roads. • indicative examples include office and shop workers,
but will generally not include workers occupationally
a exposed to PM10, as protection is covered by Health
People’s expectations will vary depending on the existing
dust deposition in the area, see Section 4.2. and Safety at Work legislation.
b
Car parks can have a range of sensitivities depending on
the duration and frequency that people would be expected Low sensitivity receptor
to park their cars there, and the level of amenity they could • locations where human exposure is transient.c
reasonably expect whilst doing so. Car parks associated with • indicative examples include public footpaths, playing
work place or residential parking might have a high level fields, parks and shopping streets.
of sensitivity compared to car parks used less frequently a
This follows Defra guidance as set out in LAQM.TG(09).
and for shorter durations, such as those associated with b
Notwithstanding the fact that the air quality objectives
shopping. Cases should be examined on their own merits. and limit values do not apply to people in the workplace,
such people can be affected to exposure of PM10. However,
they are considered to be less sensitive than the general
public as a whole because those most sensitive to the
effects of air pollution, such as young children are not
normally workers. For this reason workers have been
included in the medium sensitivty category.
c
There are no standards that apply to short-term exposure,
e.g. one or two hours, but there is still a risk of health
impacts, albeit less certain.

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Box 8: Sensitivities of Receptors to Ecological Effects
Dust deposition due to demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout has the potential to affect sensitive habitats
and plant communities.
Dust can have two types of effect on vegetation: physical and chemical. Direct physical effects include reduced photosynthesis,
respiration and transpiration through smothering. Chemical changes to soils or watercourses may lead to a loss of plants or
animals for example via changes in acidity. Indirect effects can include increased susceptibility to stresses such as pathogens
and air pollution. These changes are likely to occur only as a result of long-term demolition and construction works adjacent
to a sensitive habitat. Often impacts will be reversible once the works are completed, and dust emissions cease.
The advice of an ecologist should be sought to determine the need for an assessment of dust impacts on sensitive habitats
and plantsa . Professional judgement is required to identify where on the spectrum between high and low sensitivity a
receptor lies, taking into account the likely effect and the value of the ecological asset. A habitat may be highly valuable
but not sensitive, alternatively it may be less valuable but more sensitive to dust deposition. Consequently, specialist
ecological advice should also be sought to determine the sensitivity of the ecological receptors to dust impacts. In general
most receptors will either be of high sensitivity or low sensitivity i.e. either sensitive or not to dust deposition. The following
provides an example of possible sensitivities:
High sensitivity receptor

• locations with an international or national designation and the designated features may be affected by dust soiling; or
• locations where there is a community of a particularly dust sensitive species such as vascular species included in the
Red Data List For Great Britainb.
• indicative examples include a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) designated for acid heathlands or a local site designated
for lichens adjacent to the demolition of a large site containing concrete (alkali) buildings.
Medium sensitivity receptor

• locations where there is a particularly important plant species, where its dust sensitivity is uncertain or unknown; or
• locations with a national designation where the features may be affected by dust deposition.
• indicative example is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) with dust sensitive features.
Low sensitivity receptor

• locations with a local designation where the features may be affected by dust deposition.
• indicative example is a local Nature Reserve with dust sensitive features.

a
A Habitat Regulation Assessment of the site may be required as part of the planning process, if the site lies close to an
internationally designated site i.e. Special Conservation Areas (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs) designated under the
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and RAMSAR sites.
b
Cheffing C. M. & Farrell L. (Editors) (2005), The Vascular Plant. Red Data List for Great Britain, Joint Nature Conservation
Committee.
Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 show how the sensitivity of the area may be determined for dust soiling, human health and ecosystem
impacts respectively. These tables take account of a number of factors which may influence the sensitivity of the area. When
using these tables, it should be noted that distances are to the dust source and so a different area may be affected by trackout
than by on-site works. The highest level of sensitivity from each table should be recorded. It is not necessary to work through
the whole of each table once it is clear that the highest level of sensitivity has been determined.
While these tables are necessarily prescriptive, professional judgement may be used to determine alternative sensitivity categories,
and the factors set out in Box 9 may be useful to consider. Any judgements made should be fully documented. Whatever approach
to determining sensitivity of the area is taken, it is important that the basis of the decision is documented, and Table 5 presents
an example of how the sensitivity of the area may be presented.
18
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Box 9: Additional Factors to Consider when Determining the Sensitivity of the Area
• any history of dust generating activities in the area;
• the likelihood of concurrent dust generating activity on nearby sites;
• any pre-existing screening between the source and the receptors;
• any conclusions drawn from analysing local meteorological data which accurately represent the area; and if relevant
the season during which the works will take place;
• any conclusions drawn from local topography;
• duration of the potential impact, as a receptor may become more sensitive over time; and
• any known specific receptor sensitivities which go beyond the classifications given in this document.
Table 2: Sensitivity of the Area to Dust Soiling Effects on People and Property a b
Receptor Number Distance from the Source (m)c

Sensitivity of
Receptors <20 <50 <100 <350
High >100 High High Medium Low

10-100 High Medium Low Low
1-10 Medium Low Low Low
Medium >1 Medium Low Low Low
Low >1 Low Low Low Low
a
The sensitivity of the area should be derived for each of the four activities: demolition, construction, earthworks and
trackout. See STEP 2B, Box 6 and Box 9.
b
Estimate the total number of receptors within the stated distance. Only the highest level of area sensitivity from the
table needs to be considered. For example, if there are 7 high sensitivity receptors < 20m of the source and 95 high sen-
sitivity receptors between 20 and 50 m, then the total of number of receptors < 50 m is 102. The sensitivity of the area
in this case would be high.
c
For trackout, the distances should be measured from the side of the roads used by construction traffic. Without site-
specific mitigation, trackout may occur from roads up to 500 m from large sites, 200 m from medium sites and 50 m
from small sites, as measured from the site exit. The impact declines with distance from the site, and it is only necessary
to consider trackout impacts up to 50m from the edge of the road.

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Table 3: Sensitivity of the Area to Human Health Impacts a b
Receptor Annual Number of Distance from the Source (m)e

Sensitivity Mean PM10 Receptorsd
concentrationc <20 <50 <100 <200 <350
High >32 µg/m3
>100 High High High Medium Low
(>18 µg/m3 in 10-100 High High Medium Low Low
Scotland)
1-10 High Medium Low Low Low
28-32 µg/m 3
>100 High High Medium Low Low
(16-18 µg/m3 in 10-100 High Medium Low Low Low
Scotland)
1-10 High Medium Low Low Low
24-28 µg/m3 >100 High Medium Low Low Low
(14-16 µg/m3 in 10-100 High Medium Low Low Low
Scotland)
1-10 Medium Low Low Low Low
<24 µg/m 3
>100 Medium Low Low Low Low
(<14 µg/m3 in 10-100 Low Low Low Low Low
Scotland)
1-10 Low Low Low Low Low
Medium - >10 High Medium Low Low Low
- 1-10 Medium Low Low Low Low
Low - >1 Low Low Low Low Low
a
trackout. See STEP 2B, Box 7 and Box 9.
b
Estimate the total within the stated distance (e.g. the total within 350m and not the number between 200 and 350m),
noting that only the highest level of area sensitivity from the table needs to be considered. For example,
if there are 7 high sensitivity receptors < 20m of the source and 95 high sensitivity receptors between 20 and 50 m,
then the total of number of receptors < 50 m is 102. If the annual mean PM10 concentration is 29µg/m3, the sensitivity
of the area would be high.
c
Most straightforwardly taken from the national background maps, but should also take account of local sources. The
values are based on 32µg/m3 being the annual mean concentration at which an exceedence of the 24-hour objective is
likely in England, Walesand Northern Ireland. In Scotland there is an annual mean objective of 18µg/m3.
d
In the case of high sensitivity receptors with high occupancy (such as schools or hospitals) approximate the number
of people likely to be present. In the case of residential dwellings, just include the number of properties
e
from small sites, as measured from the site exit. The impact declines with distance from the site, and it is only neces-
sary to consider trackout impacts up to 50 m from the edge of the road.
20
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust Case study
Table 4: Sensitivity of the Area to Ecological Impacts a b
Receptor Sensitivity Distance from the Source (m)c

<20 <50
High High Medium
Medium Medium Low
Low Low Low
a
trackout and for each designated site. See STEP 2B, Box 8 and Box 9.
b
Only the highest level of area sensitivity from the table needs to be considered.
c
from small sites, as measured from the site exit. The impact declines with distance from the site.
Table 5: Example of the Outcome of Defining the Sensitivity of the Area
Potential Impact Sensitivity of the Surrounding Area

Demolition Earthworks Construction Trackout
Dust Soiling High High High Medium
Human Health High High High High
Ecological Medium Medium Low Low
7.4 STEP 2C - Define the Risk of Impacts

The dust emission magnitude determined at STEP 2A (Section 7.2) should be combined with the sensitivity of the area determined
at STEP 2B (Section 7.3) to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The matrices in Table 6, Table 7, Table
8 and Table 9 provide a method of assigning the level of risk for each activity. This should be used to determining the level of
mitigation that must be applied. Mitigation is discussed in STEP 3 (Section 8). For those cases where the risk category is ‘negligible’,
no mitigation measures beyond those required by legislation will be required.
Table 6: Risk of Dust Impacts - Demolition
Sensitivity of Area Dust Emission Magnitude

Large Medium Small
High High Risk Medium Risk Medium Risk
Medium High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Low Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
IAQM Guidance on Air Quality Monitoring in the Vicinity of Demolition and Construction Sites 21
IAQM uGUIDANCE
IES u REPORT Open Access
Table 7: Risk of Dust Impacts - Earthworks

Large Medium Small
High High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Medium Medium Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Low Low Risk Low Risk Negligible
Table 8: Risk of Dust Impacts - Construction

Large Medium Small
Medium Medium Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Table 9: Risk of Dust Impacts - Trackout

Large Medium Small
Medium Medium Risk Low Risk Negligible
The risk of dust impacts for the four activities can usefully be summarised in a table. An example of a completed risk table is
provided in Table 10.
Table 10: Example of a Summary Dust Risk Table to Define Site-Specific Mitigation
Potential Impact Risk

Demolition Earthworks Construction Trackout
Dust Soiling High Risk High Risk Low Risk Medium Risk
Human Health High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk Medium Risk
Ecological Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible
22
IAQM u GUIDANCE
8. STEP 3: Site-specific Mitigation

8.1 Introduction Responsibility Action
The dust risk categories for each of the four activities determined
in STEP 2C should be used to define the appropriate, site-specific,
mitigation measures to be adopted. Local authorities may have Commission a construction impact assessment
a Code for Construction Practice, or equivalent document, that 1. Developer with detailed mitigaiton measures, following the
should be taken into account during the development of the IAQM guidance, and submit as part of planning
mitigation measures and incorporated within the full set of application.
mitigation measures in this document.
Require a DMP to be agreed with Local Planning
Mitigation measures for London are set out in The Control of Dust 2. Local Authority Authority prior to construction commencing
and Emissions from Construction and Demolition.18 There are
as a condition to the planning consent
some differences between this London guidance and the IAQM
recommended mitigation measures. For example, the London
document uses the terms ‘compulsory’ and ‘discretionary’, the During the tender process for the Principal
IAQM uses the terms ‘ highly recommended’, and ‘desirable’. Contractor (or equivalent) the Developer
3. Developer
should include the list of detailed mitigation
One measure that is included in the London guidance that has not measures, as set out in the construction impact
been included in this guidance is the application of dust suppressants assessment in the invitiaiton to tender.
to reduce trackout of dust from construction sites. There is some
evidence of the efficacy of applying dust suppressants such as
calcium magnesium acetate (CMA) to waste and construction sites Prior to work commencing the Contractor should
in reducing local PM10 concentrations19. However, there is a lack of 4. Contractor prepare a method statement and a comprehensive,
detailed knowledge on how often and where it should applied, but site specific DMP, and agree the DMP with the
Local Planning Authority. The measures in the
this may improve over time with use. In addition, CMA is known
DMP maydiffer from the mitigation measures in
to react with bentonite, used during piling. the construction impact assessment due to the
specific methods to be used on-site. For example,
For those cases where the risk is assigned as ‘negligible’, no
measures related to activities that will not take
mitigation measures beyond those required by legislation are place on the site do not need to be included.
required. However, additional mitigation measures as defined in This provides some flexibility for the Developer.
Section 8.2 may be applied as part of good practice.
Given the variety of development sites and the individual issues 5. Local Authority Agree DMP with the Developer/Contractor
they face, professional judgement should be used to determine the
site-specific mitigation measures to be applied. These will need to
be written into a dust management plan (DMP), which should be 6. Developer Audit compliance with DMP
approved by the local planning authority prior to commencement
of work on site. For major sites the DMP may be integrated into a
Code of Construction Practice or the Construction Environmental Monitor compliance with DMP
7. Local Authority
Management Plan, and compliance monitoring may be required.
The most important aspects of the DMP are assigning responsibly Figure 2: Responsibilities for Dust Mitigation for Demolition
for dust management to an individual member of staff of the and Construction Sites. Note: ‘construction’ includes
principal contractor, training staff to understand the importance demolition and earthworks.
of the issue, and communicating with the local community.
Good dust management practices implemented at high risk sites 18

Mayor of London, 2013, The Control of Dust and Emissions
have resulted in no or minimal complaints, which illustrates the During Construction and Demolition, Draft Supplementary
value of the recommended approach. Planning Guidance.
19
Barrett B., Carslaw D., Fuller G., Green D and Tremper A., 2012,
The local authority, developer and contractor all have important
Evaluation of the impact of dust suppressant application on
roles to ensure that effective dust mitigation practices
ambient PM10 concentrations in London, Prepared for Transport
are implemented. The approach illustrated in Figure 2 is
for London under contract to URS Infrastructure & Environment
recommended.
Ltd., Kings College London.
IAQM Guidance on Air Quality Monitoring in the Vicinity of Demolition and Construction Sites 23
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
 Photo credit: Claire Holman
8.2 Dust and Air Emissions Mitigation Measures

The mitigation measures have been divided into general measures applicable to all site and measures applicable specifically to
demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout, for consistency with the assessment methodology. The following tables
detail the mitigation required for high, medium and low risk sites, as determined in STEP 2C.
For those mitigation measures that are general, the highest risk category should be applied. For example, if the site is medium
risk for earthworks and construction, but a high risk for demolition and track-out, the general measures applicable to a high risk
site should be applied.
It should be noted that it is difficult to provide generic guidance, as each site and its location will be different and professional
judgement is required.
Key to tables:
H Highly recommended
D Desirable
N Not required
Mitigation for all sites: Communications
Mitigation measure Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk
1. Develop and implement a stakeholder communications N H H

plan that includes community engagement before work com-
mences on site.
2. Display the name and contact details of person(s) account- H H H
able for air quality and dust issues on the site boundary.
This may be the environment manager/engineer or the site
manager.
3. Display the head or regional office contact information H H H
24
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Mitigation for all sites: Dust Management
Mitigation measure Low Medium High

Risk Risk Risk
4. Develop and implement a Dust Management Plan (DMP), which may include measures D H H
to control other emissions, approved by the Local Authority. The level of detail will
depend on the risk, and should include as a minimum the highly recommended measures
in this document. The desirable measures should be included as appropriate for the site.
In London additional measures may be required to ensure compliance with the Mayor of
London’s guidance. The DMP may include monitoring of dust deposition, dust flux, real-
time PM10 continuous monitoring and/or visual inspections.
Site Management
5. Record all dust and air quality complaints, identify cause(s), take appropriate measures H H H
to reduce emissions in a timely manner, and record the measures taken.
6. Make the complaints log available to the local authority when asked. H H H
7. Record any exceptional incidents that cause dust and/or air emissions, either on- or off- H H H
site, and the action taken to resolve the situation in the log book.
8. Hold regular liaison meetings with other high risk construction sites within 500m of the N N H
site boundary, to ensure plans are co-ordinated and dust and particulate matter emissions
are minimised. It is important to understand the interactions of the off-site transport/
deliveries which might be using the same strategic road network routes.
Monitoring
9. Undertake daily on-site and off-site inspection, where receptors (including roads) are D D H
nearby, to monitor dust, record inspection results, and make the log available to the local
authority when asked. This should include regular dust soiling checks of surfaces such as
street furniture, cars and window sills within 100m of site boundary, with cleaning to be
provided if necessary.
10. Carry out regular site inspections to monitor compliance with the DMP, record H H H
inspection results, and make an inspection log available to the local authority when asked
11. Increase the frequency of site inspections by the person accountable for air quality and H H H
dust issues on site when activities with a high potential to produce dust are being carried
out and during prolonged dry or windy conditions.
12. Agree dust deposition, dust flux, or real-time PM10 continuous monitoring locations N H H
with the Local Authority. Where possible commence baseline monitoring at least three
months before work commences on site or, if it a large site, before work on a phase
commences. Further guidance is provided by IAQM on monitoring during demolition,
earthworks and construction.
Preparing and maintaining the site
13. Plan site layout so that machinery and dust causing activities are located away from H H H
receptors, as far as is possible.
14. Erect solid screens or barriers around dusty activities or the site boundary that are at H H H
least as high as any stockpiles on site.
15. Fully enclose site or specific operations where there is a high potential for dust produc- D H H
tion and the site is actives for an extensive period
16. Avoid site runoff of water or mud. H H H
17. Keep site fencing, barriers and scaffolding clean using wet methods. D H H

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust

Risk Risk Risk
18. Remove materials that have a potential to produce dust from site as soon as possible, D H H
unless being re-used on site. If they are being re-used on-site cover as described below.
19. Cover, seed or fence stockpiles to prevent wind whipping. D H H
Operating vehicle/machinery and sustainable travel
20. Ensure all on-road vehicles comply with the requirements of the London Low Emission H H H
Zone and the London NRMM standards, where applicable
21. Ensure all vehicles switch off engines when stationary - no idling vehicles. H H H
22. Avoid the use of diesel or petrol powered generators and use mains electricity or H H H
battery powered equipment where practicable.
23. Impose and signpost a maximum-speed-limit of 15 mph on surfaced and 10 mph on un- D D H
surfaced haul roads and work areas (if long haul routes are required these speeds may be
increased with suitable additional control measures provided, subject to the approval of the
nominated undertaker and with the agreement of the local authority, where appropriate)
24. Produce a Construction Logistics Plan to manage the sustainable delivery of goods and materials. N H H
25. Implement a Travel Plan that supports and encourages sustainable travel (public N D H
transport, cycling, walking, and car-sharing)
Operations
26. Only use cutting, grinding or sawing equipment fitted or in conjunction with suitable H H H
dust suppression techniques such as water sprays or local extraction, e.g. suitable local
exhaust ventilation systems.
27. Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter H H H
suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.
28. Use enclosed chutes and conveyors and covered skips. H H H
29. Minimise drop heights from conveyors, loading shovels, hoppers and other loading or H H H
handling equipment and use fine water sprays on such equipment wherever appropriate.
30. Ensure equipment is readily available on site to clean any dry spillages, and clean up D H H
spillages as soon as reasonably practicable after the event using wet cleaning methods.
Waste management
31. Avoid bonfires and burning of waste materials. H H H
Measures specific to demolition

Risk Risk Risk
32. Soft strip inside buildings before demolition (retaining walls and windows in the rest of D D H
the building where possible, to provide a screen against dust).
33. Ensure effective water suppression is used during demolition operations. Hand held H H H
sprays are more effective than hoses attached to equipment as the water can be directed
to where it is needed. In addition high volume water suppression systems, manually
controlled, can produce fine water droplets that effectively bring the dust particles to the
ground.
34. Avoid explosive blasting, using appropriate manual or mechanical alternatives. H H H
35. Bag and remove any biological debris or damp down such material before demolition. H H H
26
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
Measures specific to earthworks

Risk Risk Risk
36. Re-vegetate earthworks and exposed areas/soil stockpiles to stabilise surfaces as soon N D H
as practicable..
37. Use Hessian, mulches or trackifiers where it is not possible to re-vegetate or cover with N D H
topsoil, as soon as practicable
38. Only remove the cover in small areas during work and not all at once N D H
Measures specific to construction

Risk Risk Risk
39. Avoid scabbling (roughening of concrete surfaces) D D H
if possible
40. Ensure sand and other aggregates are stored in bunded areas and are not allowed to D H H
dry out, unless this is required for a particular process, in which case ensure that appropri-
ate additional control measures are in place.
41. Ensure bulk cement and other fine powder materials are delivered in enclosed tankers N D H
and stored in silos with suitable emission control systems to prevent escape of material
and overfilling during delivery.
42. For smaller supplies of fine power materials ensure bags are sealed after use and stored N D D
appropriately to prevent dust.
Measures specific to trackout

Risk Risk Risk
43. Use water-assisted dust sweeper(s) on the access and local roads, to remove, as necessary, D H H
any material tracked out of the site. This may require the sweeper being continuously in use.
44. Avoid dry sweeping of large areas. D H H
45. Ensure vehicles entering and leaving sites are covered to prevent escape of materials D H H
during transport.
46. Inspect on-site haul routes for integrity and instigate necessary repairs to the surface as N H H
soon as reasonably practicable.
47. Record all inspections of haul routes and any subsequent action in a site log book. D H H
48. Install hard surfaced haul routes, which are regularly damped down with fixed or N H H
mobile sprinkler systems, or mobile water bowsers and regularly cleaned.
49. Implement a wheel washing system (with rumble grids to dislodge accumulated dust D H H
and mud prior to leaving the site where reasonably practicable).
50. Ensure there is an adequate area of hard surfaced road between the wheel wash facility N H H
and the site exit, wherever site size and layout permits.
51. Access gates to be located at least 10m from receptors where possible. N H H

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
9. STEP 4: Determine Significant Effects

9.1 Introduction 9.2 Determining whether significant effects are likely
Traditionally, Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) have Once the risk of dust impacts has been determined in STEP 2C
evaluated the significance of adverse effects prior to mitigation and the appropriate dust mitigation measures identified in STEP 3
and re-evaluated them post mitigation following a consideration the final step is to determine whether there are significant effects
of the anticipated effectiveness of the proposed mitigation arising from the construction phase of a proposed development.
measures. Research by the Institute of Environmental Management
& Assessment (IEMA) has found that many UK EIA practitioners For almost all construction activity, the aim should be to prevent
no longer adopt this approach because EIA influences the design significant effects on receptors through the use of effective
process, and any significant adverse environmental effects are mitigation. Experience shows that this is normally possible.
either avoided or reduced through design before the proposal is Hence the residual effect will normally be ‘not significant’.
finalised, and thus the pre-mitigation impacts are not relevant20.
Instead, just the residual effects are reported. This approach There may be cases where, for example, there is inadequate
assumes that all actions to avoid or reduce the environmental access to water for dust suppression to be effective, and
effects are an inherent part of the proposed development. even with other mitigation measures in place there may be
Furthermore, in the case of demolition / construction it is a significant effect. Therefore, it is important to consider the
assumed that mitigation (secured by planning conditions, legal specific characteristics of the site and the surrounding area to
requirements or required by regulations) will ensure that a ensure that the conclusion of no significant effect is robust.
potential significant adverse effect will not occur, so the residual
effect will normally be ‘not significant’ .
The Highways Agency has adopted this approach for road

schemes in England, but thus far not in Scotland and Wales21 . The
key to such an approach is that it assumes that the “Overseeing
Organisation / Competent Authority” will ensure all mitigation
measures are successfully implemented. For other types of
developments, the IEMA report suggests that rigorous systems
to check that post-consent mitigation is delivered may not exist.
IAQM recommends that significance is only assigned to the effect

after considering the construction activity with mitigation. It is,
therefore, important that the mitigation measures are defined
in a form suitable for implementation by way of a planning
condition or legal obligation within a section 106 agreement, and
are included in a DMP or a more general Code of Construction
Practice or Construction Environmental Management Plan.
Even with a rigorous DMP in place, it is not possible to guarantee

that the dust mitigation measures will be effective all the time,
and if, for example, dust emissions occur under adverse weather
conditions, or there is an interruption to the water supply used
for dust suppression, the local community may experience
occasional, short-term dust annoyance. The likely scale of this
would not normally be considered sufficient to change the
conclusion that with mitigation the effects will be ‘not significant’.
20
Special Report – State of the Environmental Impact Assessment
When completing dust assessments for EIA chapters the Practice in the UK, Institute of Environmental Management &
Environmental Statement Co-ordinator may request the Assessment, June 2011
magnitude of effects without mitigation. For the reasons given 21
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 11, Section 2,
above, this is not considered appropriate. Part 5, HA 205/08, Highways Agency, August 2008
28
IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
10. STEP 5: Dust Assessment Report

Whilst the detailed content of a Dust Assessment Report
should be determined by its author(s) it is important that there
is sufficient descriptive text for a third party to determine how
the emission magnitude and sensitivity of the area surrounding
the site, and hence the site risk, have been determined.
This text could usefully be accompanied by Table 1, Table 5 and

Table 10 to show the dust emission magnitude, the sensitivity of
the area and the risk of impacts without mitigation respectively.
There should be a section of the report detailing the mitigation

that is required to ensure that there is no significant effect. This
should be site-specific and should detail why particular choices
have been made.
In addition, the report should describe the mechanism for

ensuring that the appropriate level of mitigation will be
implemented, e.g. through a planning condition.
 Photo credit: Roger Barrowcliffe

IAQM u GUIDANCE
Construction Dust
11. Professional Judgement

Throughout this document reference is made to the use of experienced practitioner. Those who are making the professional
professional judgement. This is necessary, because the diverse judgment must be able to demonstrate technical competency
range of projects that are likely to be subject to dust impact in the assessment of dust impacts. For example, a person with
assessment means that it is not possible to be prescriptive as to Full Membership of IAQM and with experience of assessing
how to assess the impacts. Also a wide range of factors affect dust impacts for a minimum of 10 diverse projects, including
the amount of dust that may arise, and these are not readily some complex multi-phase projects and similar projects to
quantified. This document provides a framework to ensure that that being assessed, is likely to be technically competent. The
assessments are more consistent and consider the full range of IAQM is the only UK professional body specifically for air quality
potential impacts. practitioners although there are a number of more general
environmental professional organisations, whose members may
These impacts are often considered to be relatively unimportant also be competent.
compared to assessments of the operational air quality impacts.
However, IAQM considers that it requires a level of experience Where possible the name of the assessor and/or supervisor
and skill to produce a fit for purpose assessment, and therefore should be included in the assessment report, with a brief
it should be undertaken by, or under the close supervision of, an summary of their relevant qualifications and experience.
 Photo credit: Roger Barrowcliffe
30
C
IAQM
c/o Institution of Environmental Sciences
34 Grosvenor Gardens | London
SW1W 0DH
+44 (0)20 7730 5516
Institute of
Air Quality [email protected]
Management www.iaqm.co.uk

Guidance On The Assessment of Dust From Demolition and Construction

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidance On The Assessment of Dust From Demolition and Construction

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidance On The Assessment of Dust From Demolition and Construction

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IAQM u GUIDANCE

Guidance on the assessment of dust from

Figure 1: Steps to Perform a Dust Assessment 12

Box 1: Screening Criteria 13

Members Front cover photo: Hannah Dalton

Graphic Design: Darren Walker (darrengraphidesign.com)

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 3

This guidance represents an update of the 2012 IAQM

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 5

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 7

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requires the consideration

The Building Research Establishment (BRE) undertook research,

In 2006 the Greater London Authority (GLA) with the London

In the development of this IAQM guidance there has been much

The original guidance, published in January 2012, has been updated

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 9

Local wind speed and direction influences the dispersion of dust.

• annoyance due to dust soiling;

The assessment is used to define appropriate mitigation

The assessment steps are summarised below and in Figure 1.

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 11

Figure 1: Steps to Perform a Dust Assessment

· demolition · earthworks · construction · trackout

6. STEP 1: Screen the Need for a Detailed Assessment

 Photo credit: Roger Barrowcliffe

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 13

7. STEP 2: Assess the Risk of Dust Impacts

Box 3: Crushing and Screening Box 4: Concrete Batching Plant

• Small: Total building volume <25,000 m3, construction

• Medium: 10-50 HDV (>3.5t) outward movements16 in any a

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 15

Activity Dust Emission Magnitude

The type of receptors at different distances from the site

• there is transient exposure, where the people or Medium sensitivity receptor

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 17

Box 8: Sensitivities of Receptors to Ecological Effects

High sensitivity receptor

Medium sensitivity receptor

Low sensitivity receptor

• indicative example is a local Nature Reserve with dust sensitive features.

• any history of dust generating activities in the area;

• the likelihood of concurrent dust generating activity on nearby sites;

• any pre-existing screening between the source and the receptors;

• any conclusions drawn from local topography;

Receptor Number Distance from the Source (m)c

High >100 High High Medium Low

IAQM Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 19

Table 3: Sensitivity of the Area to Human Health Impacts a b

Receptor Annual Number of Distance from the Source (m)e

Table 4: Sensitivity of the Area to Ecological Impacts a b

Receptor Sensitivity Distance from the Source (m)c

Table 5: Example of the Outcome of Defining the Sensitivity of the Area

Potential Impact Sensitivity of the Surrounding Area

7.4 STEP 2C - Define the Risk of Impacts

Table 6: Risk of Dust Impacts - Demolition

Sensitivity of Area Dust Emission Magnitude

Table 7: Risk of Dust Impacts - Earthworks

Sensitivity of Area Dust Emission Magnitude

Table 8: Risk of Dust Impacts - Construction