Morphological Observations On Pentatrichomonas Hominis, Enteromonas Hominis and Rodentolepis Nana
Morphological Observations On Pentatrichomonas Hominis, Enteromonas Hominis and Rodentolepis Nana
Morphological Observations On Pentatrichomonas Hominis, Enteromonas Hominis and Rodentolepis Nana
net/publication/255929305
CITATIONS READS
2 674
3 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Prevalence of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) and antimicrobial resistance in Gambian Clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates: View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Richard Stewart Bradbury on 03 October 2016.
Methods
Faecal Concentration
Three separate Sodium-acetate Acetic-acid Formalin (Para-Pak SAF - Merid- slide (Remel, Lenexa, KS) and in-house prepared Cryptosporidium species
ian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH) preserved faecal samples were collected from control slide was included in each batch of slides stained. Microscopy of the
each patient and submitted for parasitological investigation to the Microbiol- permanent smear at x1000 (bright light) was performed using the “battle-
ogy Laboratory, RHH. Specimens were homogenised and 2-5 mL (depending ments” method.
on viscosity) of each added to separate plastic Evergreen faecal concentrate
tubes (Evergreen, Los Angeles, CA) This volume was made up to 10 mL with Results and Discussion
sterile saline then tube capped and mixed. Tubes were centrifuged at 500g The human commensal ßagellate protozoan; P. hominis (Figure 2) is easily
for 10 minutes and the excess supernatant discarded. Smears for permanent identiÞed by its distinctly pyriform shape, round nucleus, anterior ßagella
staining (Table 1) were prepared by mixing one drop of the sediment with and distinct pointed axostyle, which extends beyond the posterior end.2 In
approximately ½ drop of Mayer’s albumin (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, saline preparations, the trophozoites have a distinctive jerky motility, often
OH) on a glass microscope slide. These slides were then allowed to air dry described as resembling a “man trapped in a plastic bag”. This protozoan is
for at least 10 min. Prepared smears were stained using the modiÞed iron- uncommon, and stains poorly in permanent stains,1 and thus is often over-
haematoxylin method described in Table 1. A commercial protozoan control looked when present. No cyst stage of this organism exists.3
Figure 2 Cysts and trophozoites Enteromonas hominis Figure 3 Egg of Rodentolepis nana (saline preparation)
The commensal protozoan E. hominis (Figure 3) morphologically resembles During the course of this work, an observation was made regarding the
Endolimax. nana. These two organisms may be differentiated by the smaller modiÞed acid fast nature of the oncosphere of R. nana eggs (Figures 3, 4).
size of E. hominis compared to E. nana (with marked size overlap). Cysts of E. This previously unreported phenomenon is universally observed in eggs of
hominis are usually 6-8 įm by 4-6 įm, whilst trophozoites usually measure this species when stained with the modiÞed iron-haematoxylin stain method.
3-6 įm by 4-10 įm.3 Trophozoites of E. hominis possess a distinctive Þnely This observation lends itself to improved screening for R. nana in faeces for
vacuolated cytoplasm.3 There is a predominance of binucleate forms (note epidemiological studies. As few normal elements of faeces are modiÞed acid
that uninucleate and quadrinucleate forms are seen), and trophozoites often fast, screening for R. nana eggs could be performed by preparing a thick
taper to a point at one end.2 The authors have also noted when observing smear of faeces and staining with a modiÞed acid fast stain, followed by
E. hominis that the nuclei appear smaller than those of E. nana and that the miscroscopic screening on low power for the modiÞed acid fast oncosphere
trophozoites are more “amoeboid” in appearance (having a greater numbers of these eggs. Such a method; when performed on concentrated faecal sam-
of cytoplasmic blebs and protuberances than are seen in the trophozoites E. ples; would allow a higher sensitivity than a faecal concentration technique
nana). It is suggested that human colonisation with this organism is under- followed by screening of two microscope cover-slips alone.
reported, due to its misidentiÞcation as E. nana.
*Corresponding author
References Richard S. Bradbury
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,
1. Garcia L. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2007.
2. Ash LR, Orihel TC. Atlas of Human Parasitology. Chicago: ASCP Press, 1997.
Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street,
3. Beaver PC, Jung RC, Wayne E. Clinical Parasitology. 9th Ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1984. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Email: [email protected]
View publication stats