Female Pelvic Floor Anatomy: The Pelvic Floor, Supporting Structures, and Pelvic Organs
Female Pelvic Floor Anatomy: The Pelvic Floor, Supporting Structures, and Pelvic Organs
Female Pelvic Floor Anatomy: The Pelvic Floor, Supporting Structures, and Pelvic Organs
The development of novel, less invasive therapies for stress urinary inconti-
nence in women requires a thorough knowledge of the relationship between the
pathophysiology of incontinence and anatomy. This article provides a review
of the anatomy of the pelvic floor and lower urinary tract. Also discussed is
the hammock hypothesis, which describes urethral support within the pelvis
and provides an explanation of the continence mechanism.
[Rev Urol. 2004;6(suppl 5):S2-S10]
T
he effective management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) requires
knowledge of the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind the disorder. Key to
identifying these mechanisms and providing proper treatment to women
with SUI is an understanding of the anatomy and function of the female pelvic
floor and its supporting structures.
Anterior Supports
There is agreement among investiga-
tors that the connective tissue sup-
Urethra
The urethra is a complex tubular
structure extending below the bladder
to the external meatus (Figure 11). It
has distinct muscular elements asso-
ciated both within and without to
permit its functioning for storage
(continence) and voiding.
Figure 10. (A) Vagina and supportive structures drawn from dissection of a 56-year-old cadaver after hysterectomy:
The bladder has been removed above the vesical neck. Paracolpium extends along the lateral wall of vagina. (B) In
The smooth muscle of the urethra
level I, paracolpium suspends vagina from the lateral pelvic walls. In level II, the vagina is attached to arcus is contiguous with that of the trigone
tendineus of pelvic fascia and superior fascia of levator ani muscles. Reprinted, with permission, from DeLancey and detrusor.32 It has a prominent
JOL. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717-1728.28
inner longitudinal and a thin outer
circular layer. The layers lie inside
sides of the vagina (Figure 10). ani muscles and, posteriorly, it fuses the outer striated urogenital sphincter
According to DeLancey,28 the recto- with the perineal body. The recto- muscle and are present throughout
vaginal fascia is found mostly at the vaginal fascia is thickest in this the upper four fifths of the urethra.
sides and is extremely thin in the region,31 and the vagina in this area The configuration of the circular
midline of the vaginal wall. However, has no mobility separate from its muscle implies a role in constricting
a posterior rectovaginal septum, adjacent structures.28 the lumen, and the longitudinal mus-
consisting of fibromuscular elastic The fascial supports for the rectum, cle may aid in shortening the urethra
tissue, extending from the peritoneal the lateral rectal ligaments, extend during voiding.33
reflection to the perineal body has from the posterolateral pelvic side The outer layer of the urethra is
been described.21 During fetal life, the
peritoneal cavity extends to the cra-
nial part of the perineal body, but it Figure 11. Urethral
anatomy: the urethra
becomes obliterated in early life. Its has distinct muscular
fused layers (Denonvillier’s fascia) elements associated
both within and without
probably become part of the recto- to permit its functioning
vaginal septum adherent to the for storage and voiding.
undersurface of the posterior vaginal Reprinted, with permis-
sion, from Strohbehn K,
wall. This fascia forms the anterior DeLancey JOL. Oper
margin of another potential space, Tech Gynecol Surg.
1997;2:5-16.38
the rectovaginal space. The recto-
vaginal septum, if intact and normal,
permits independent mobility of the
rectal and vaginal walls.
In the distal vagina, 2 cm to 3 cm
above the hymeneal ring, the vaginal
wall is directly attached to surround-
ing structures without any intervening
paracolpium. Anteriorly, the vagina
fuses with the urethra and the connec-
tive tissue of the perineal membrane
and muscles (urogenital diaphragm).
Laterally, it blends with the levator
formed by the muscle of the striated Figure 12. Lateral view of the pelvic
floor with the urethra, vagina, and
urogenital sphincter that is found in fascial tissues transected at the level
the middle three fifths of the length. of the vesical neck, drawn from
3-dimensional reconstruction indi-
In its upper two thirds, the sphincter- cating compression of the urethra
like fibers are circular. In the distal by downward force (arrow) against
part, the fibers exit the urethra and the supportive tissues. Reprinted,
with permission, from DeLancey
surround the vaginal wall as the ure- JOL. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;
throvaginal sphincter or extend 175:311-319.37
Main Points
• The levator plate, the shelf on which the pelvic organs rest, is horizontal when the body is in a standing position and supports
the rectum and upper two thirds of the vagina above it. Weakness of the levator ani may loosen the sling behind the anorectum
and cause the levator plate to sag, opening the urogenital hiatus and allowing pelvic organ prolapse.
• The urogenital diaphragm closes the levator hiatus, supports and has a sphincter-like effect at the distal vagina, provides struc-
tural support for the distal urethra, and contributes to continence in that it is attached to the periurethral striated muscles.
• There is controversy regarding whether the anterior vaginal wall includes a suburethral fascial layer; regardless, the anterior
vaginal wall provides support to the urethra by its lateral attachment to the levators and to the endopelvic fascia from the arcus
tendineus of the pelvic fascia.
• A combination of smooth and striated muscle, connective tissue, mucosa, and submucosa are necessary for a functional urethral
sphincter, which provides watertight apposition of the urethral lumen, compression of the wall around the lumen, and a means
of compensating for abdominal pressure changes.
• The “hammock hypothesis” describes support of the urethra by a coordinated action of fascia and muscles, which provides a ham-
mock onto which the urethra is compressed during increases in intra-abdominal pressure.
tendineus at the pelvic sidewall, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998;25:683-705. 1969;163:433-451.
3. Lawson JO. Pelvic anatomy I: pelvic floor mus- 22. Zacharin RF. The suspensory mechanism of the
whereas the muscular attachments cles. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1974;54:244-252. female urethra. J Anat. 1963;97:423-427.
connect the periurethral tissue to the 4. Salmons S. Muscle. In: Williams PL, Bannister LH, 23. Mostwin JL, Yang A, Sanders R, Genadry R.
Berry MM, et al, eds. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed. Radiography, sonography, and magnetic reso-
medial border of the levator ani.24 New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:737-900. nance imaging for stress incontinence: contri-
Urethral support is provided by a 5. Berglas B, Rubin IC. Study of the supportive butions, uses, and limitations. Urol Clin North
coordinated action of fascia and structures of the uterus by levator myography. Am. 1995;22:539-549.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97:677-692. 24. DeLancey JOL. Pubovesical ligament: a separate
muscles acting as an integrated unit 6. DeLancey JO, Hurd WW. Size of the urogenital structure from the urethral supports (‘pubourethral
under neural control.33 This musculo- hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal ligaments’). Neurourol Urodyn. 1989;8:53-61.
women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. 25. Wilson PD, Dixon JS, Brown AD, Gosling JA.
fascial support provides a hammock Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:364-368. Posterior pubo-urethral ligaments in normal
onto which the urethra is compressed 7. Fielding JR, Dumanli H, Schreyer AG, et al. MR- and genuine stress incontinent women. J Urol.
based three-dimensional modeling of the nor- 1983;130:802-805.
during increases in intra-abdominal 26. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Wein B, Niehaus S, et al.
mal female pelvic floor in women: quantifica-
pressure. One can surmise that the tion of muscle mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol. The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging
urethral sphincter mechanism is 2000;174:657-660. of the pelvic floor to the understanding of uri-
8. Gosling J, Alm P, Bartch G, et al. Gross anato- nary incontinence. Br J Urol. 1993;72:715-718.
operative and adds to the process. my of the lower urinary tract. In: Abrams P, 27. Aronson MP, Bates SM, Jacoby AF, et al.
Furthermore, failure of one of the Khoury S, Wein A, eds. Incontinence: First Periurethral and paravaginal anatomy: an
International Consultation. Plymouth, UK: endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging study.
support components will not invari- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1702-1708.
Health Publications Ltd; 1999:21-56.
ably produce stress incontinence, 9. Gilpin SA, Gosling JA, Smith AR, Warrell DW. The 28. DeLancey JOL. Anatomic aspects of vaginal
because of the compensatory effect pathogenesis of genitourinary prolapse and stress eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet
urinary incontinence of urine: a histological and Gynecol. 1992;166:1717-1728.
of the other component. This may histochemical study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 29. Thompson DJ. Surgical correction of defects in
explain why some women with 1989;96:15-23. pelvic supports; pelvic organ prolapse. In: Rock
JA, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde’s Operative
hypermobility have no incontinence. 10. Gosling JA, Dixon JS, Critchley HO, Thompson
Gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-
SA. A comparative study of the human external
It may also explain why injectable sphincter and periurethral levator ani muscles. Raven Publishers; 1997:951-979.
agents can be used in women with Br J Urol. 1981;53:35-41. 30. Raz S, Stothers L, Chopra A. Vaginal reconstruc-
11. Critchley HO, Dixon JS, Gosling JA. tive surgery for incontinence and prolapse. In:
hypermobility: the bulking agent may Comparative study of the periurethral and peri- Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ,
improve urethral sphincter function. anal parts of the human levator ani muscle. Urol eds. Campbell’s Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia:
Int. 1980;35:226-232. WB Saunders Company; 1998:1059-1094.
31. Reiffenstuhl G. Practical pelvic anatomy for the
12. Klutke CG, Siegel CL. Functional female pelvic
Conclusions anatomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1995;22:487-498.
gynecologic surgeon. In: Nichols DH, ed.
Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St Louis:
Increased knowledge of the anatomy 13. Oelrich TM. The striated urogenital sphincter mus-
Mosby; 1993:26-71.
of the pelvic floor and lower urinary cle in the female. Anat Rec. 1983;205:223-232.
32. Huisman AB. Aspects on the anatomy of the
14. DeLancey JO. Structural anatomy of the posteri-
tract has led to a better understanding female urethra with special relation to urinary
or pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele.
incontinence. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 1983;
of the pathophysiology of inconti- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:815-823.
10:1-31.
15. Nichols DH. Central compartment defects. In:
nence. This, in turn, has led to the Rock JA, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde’s Operative
33. DeLancey JO. Anatomy. In: Cardozo L, Staskin
D, eds. Textbook of Female Urology and
development of newer and minimally Gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-
Urogynaecology. 1st ed. London: Isis Medical
invasive treatment options for stress Raven Publishers; 1997:1006-1030.
Media; 2001:112-124.
16. Norton PA. Pelvic floor disorders: the role of
incontinence. Although these treat- 34. Huffman J. Detailed anatomy of the para-
fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993; urethral ducts in the adult human female. Am J
ment options are widely applicable, 36:926-938. Obstet Gynecol. 1948;55:86-101.
17. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra
not all patients are candidates or will as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the
35. Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Urinary incontinence:
pathophysiology, evaluation, and management
respond. It is in the setting of the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. overview. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED
complex patient with incontinence 1994;170:1713-1723. Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed.
18. Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal pro- Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2002:
with or without pelvic organ prolapse lapse: review of anatomy and techniques of sur- 1027-1052.
that the clinician must call on his or gical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:311-318. 36. Herschorn S, Carr LK. Vaginal reconstructive
19. Blaivas JG, Romanzi LJ, Heritz DM. Urinary surgery for sphincteric incontinence and pro-
her knowledge of anatomy to guide incontinence: pathophysiology, evaluation, treat- lapse. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr,
treatment decision making. ment overview, and nonsurgical management. Wein AJ, eds. Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed.
In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2002:
eds. Campbell’s Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB 1092-1139.
References Saunders Company; 1998:1007-1043. 37. DeLancey JOL. Stress urinary incontinence:
1. Soames RW. Skeletal system. In: Williams PL, 20. Krantz KE. The anatomy of the urethra and where are we now, where should we go? Am J
Bannister LH, Berry MM, et al, eds. Gray’s anterior vaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:311-319.
Anatomy. 38th ed. New York: Churchill 1951;62:374-386. 38. Strohbehn K, DeLancey JOL. The anatomy of
Livingstone; 1995:425-736. 21. Milley PS, Nichols DH. A correlative investiga- stress incontinence. Oper Tech Gynecol Surg.
2. Strohbehn K. Normal pelvic floor anatomy. tion of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec. 1997;2:5-16.