Pure Dhamma 07october2019
Pure Dhamma 07october2019
Pure Dhamma 07october2019
$4XHVWWR5HFRYHU%XGGKD
V7UXH7HDFKLQJV
CZ
-BM"1JOOBEVXBHF
Website : https://puredhamma.net
&RPSLOHGE\6HQJ.LDW1J
RQOctober 07,9
Contents I
Table of Contents
Part I Home 1
7 Sansāric Time Scale, Buddhist Cosmology, and the Big Bang Theory ............................................................ 51
5 Sorting out Some Key Pali Terms (Taṇhā, Lobha, Dosa, Moha, etc) ............................................................ 227
Kama Taṇhā, Bhava Taṇhā, Vibhava Taṇhā ........................................................................................................................................ 227
Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance .................................................................................................................. 229
Lobha, Raga and Kāmaccanda, Kāmarāga ........................................................................................................................................... 231
Lobha, Dosa, Moha Versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā ................................................................................................................................ 233
What is Avijjā (Ignorance)? .................................................................................................................................................................... 235
Indriya and Āyatana – Big Difference .................................................................................................................................................... 237
Hetu-Phala, Paccuppanna, and Paṭicca Samuppāda ............................................................................................................................ 240
Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct Views) .............................................................................................................. 242
Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra ........................................................................................................................................................ 243
Kāmaccandha and Icca – Being Blinded by Cravings .......................................................................................................................... 247
3 Good Explanations – Key to Weeding Out Bad Versions of Dhamma .......................................................... 553
Consciousness and the Brain ................................................................................................................................................................... 554
Matter Creates Mind or Mind Creates Matter? ................................................................................................................................... 554
6 Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda (How We Create Our Own Rebirths) .............................................................. 933
7 Imasmim Sati Idam Hoti – What Does It Really Mean? ................................................................................ 937
11 9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati) ...................................................... 1039
Introduction to Character or Personality (Gathi) ............................................................................................................................... 1039
A Broad View of the “Person” Trying to be a “Better Person” ........................................................................................................ 1040
How Character (Gathi) Leads to Bhava and Jathi ............................................................................................................................. 1042
13 10. Attaining the Sotāpanna Stage via Removing Ditthasava ...................................................................... 1048
15 12. Key Factors to be Considered when “Meditating” for the Sotapanna Stage ........................................ 1056
18 Anussati and Anupassanā – Being Mindful and Removing Defilements .................................................... 1066
20 A Simple Way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and Avoid Demerits (Akusala) ............................................... 1074
21 Pañca Indriya and Pañca Bala – Five Faculties and Five Powers ............................................................... 1077
25 Are you not getting expected results from meditation? ................................................................................ 1088
26 How to Attain Samādhi via “Vipassana Pubbanga Samatha” Bhavana ..................................................... 1093
14 Yamaka Sutta (SN 22.85) – Arahanthood Is Not Annihilation but End of Suffering ................................ 1368
6 Boy Who Remembered Pāli Suttas for 1500 Years ....................................................................................... 1392
15 Mars Curiosity Photos Suggest Life May Have Existed on Red Planet ...................................................... 1464
19 There are as many creatures on your body as there are people on Earth! ................................................. 1468
27 Ancient teeth found in China challenge modern human migration theory ................................................. 1482
I Home
Pure Dhamma
A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
Website: https://www.puredhamma.net/
o Buddha Dhamma
o Key Dhamma Concepts
o Living Dhamma
o Dhamma and Science
o Three Levels of Practice
o Tables and Summaries
o Paṭicca Samuppāda
o Comments/Reviews
o Dhamma and Philosophy
o Bhāvanā (Meditation)
o Abhidhamma
o Historical Background
o Buddhist Chanting
o Dhammapada
o Sutta Interpretations
o Myths or Realities?
o References
o Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma
o About Author
o Sitemap
Welcome!
Revised August 12, 2019
This goal of this site is to explore the Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) or the “laws of nature” as
discovered by the Buddha 2500 years ago. Even though I am a Buddhist by birth, I never bothered to
look into the question of why I was a Buddhist. When I retired several years ago, I first started
reading widely on many subjects, including science, philosophy, and religion.
§ When I started to glean the profound message of the Buddha, I realized that I had not known
much about my own “religion”. Furthermore, it had been “contaminated” over its long history.
Since 2009, I have been trying to find the essence of the message of the Buddha. I wanted to
share the results with the rest of the world.
§ You can read about me at “About“.
§ Also, one really needs to contemplate on the ideas presented; just quickly going through may
not yield many benefit.
Another aspect that I try to highlight is the CONSISTENCY of Buddha Dhamma. You will see links
from any given area to other sections. The Buddha is called “Bhaghavath” [bhagava] because he
analyzed the same thing in many different ways. They are all consistent internally as well as with the
primary axioms such as the 31 realms of existence, the concept of kamma, and rebirth.
§ As science has progressed, mainly over the past hundred or so years, consistency with science
is becoming apparent as well. But science has not grasped the importance of the mind (over
matter) yet. In some of the posts I am making predictions on what will be discovered by science
in the future. To have a timestamp, I started putting the date of publication of new posts
beginning late October, 2015.
§ Please send your suggestions/comments/questions and also let me know of any technical issues
with the site using the “Comments” tab. I do not plan to have a discussion forum, so your
comments will not be published.
§ I usually write four to five essays a month and they are in the “New/Revised Posts” in the menu
on the bottom of each page. Engaging/relevant news articles are also added to that menu.
§ I started posting the date of publication in new posts starting on October 23, 2015. Thus if a
post is not dated, it must have been published before that date.
The Buddha said, “Sabba dānan Dhamma dānan jināti”, or “Gift of Dhamma excels all other gifts.”
Please inform others about this site if you benefit from it.
§ However, we should only inform others. Humanity has suffered enough from those who have
tried to force their views on others. As the Buddha said, “Come and see for yourself!”.
The Buddha also said, “Sabba ratin Dhamma ratin jināti”, or “Taste of Dhamma excels all other
tastes (pleasures).” I hope you will have the patience to look around the site to learn enough pure
Dhamma to start enjoying its taste.
Note added/revised December 7, 2016: I have added a “Font Size Selector” on the top right so that
any reader can control the font size.
§ There are two other possible tools: 1. Each post can be printed using the PRINT button below
that post. 2. All the posts at the site can be downloaded using three eBook formats. One can
read them on electronic readers like Amazon Kindle: Pure Dhamma Essays in Book Format.
Note added June 8, 2017: As of today, there are over 450 posts on the website. Recently, I have
been getting inquiries on “where to start?”. I just added the following post to summarize various
sections and how to locate posts of interest: “User’s Guide to Pure Dhamma Website.”
April 14, 2018: Discussion forum initiated in December of 2017: “Forum.” Updates and new posts
are posted at “1- General Information and Updates“.
In March 2018, a new section on “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma.”
November 20, 2018: I have disabled comments on individual posts. You can make comments at the
“Forums,” or send me an email: [email protected].
July 10, 2019: New section on “Origin of Life.”
II Buddha Dhamma
o User’s Guide to Pure Dhamma Website
o What is Buddha Dhamma?
o Foundation of Dhamma
o The Importance of Purifying the Mind
o Subsection: The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma
§ The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma – Introduction
§ Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial
§ 31 Realms Associated with the Earth
§ Gandhabba – Only in Human and Animal Realms
§ Body Types in Different Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kāya
§ Gandhabba Sensing the World – With and Without a Physical Body
§ Nibbāna in the Big Picture
o Buddha Dhamma: Non-Perceivability and Self-Consistency
o Sansaric Time Scale
o Evidence for Rebirth
o Subsection: Power of the Human Mind
§ Power of the Human Mind – Introduction
§ Difference Between Jhāna and Stages of Nibbāna
§ Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhānas
§ Power of the Human Mind – Ariya Jhānas
§ Are There Procedures for Attaining Magga Phala, Jhāna and Abhiññā?
o Transfer of Merits (Pattidana) – How Does it Happen?
o First Noble Truth is Suffering? Myths about Suffering
o Vinaya – The Nature Likes to be in Equillibrium
As of today, there are over 450 posts at the website. Recently, I have been getting inquiries on “where
to start?” when one first comes to the website.
1. First, there are a few general tools that can be used to navigate the website:
§ Following is how the home page of the site should look like.
§ If you do not see it like that with the menu system, you should update your browser (Google
Chrome, Microsoft Explorer, Firefox, etc) so that you would be able to see the menu as shown
above.
§ Another way to look at the whole menu is “Pure Dhamma – Sitemap“. All posts are categorized
under sections and subsections there. One could scan through it to locate relevant posts of
interest.
§ The “Search” button at top right is also good at extracting relevant posts for a given key word
or key words.
§ I have added a “bread crumbs” link at the top of each page, so that you can see which
section/subsection the page belongs to. You can go to that section/subsection and read more on
that topic.
§ January 30, 2019: For those who are new to Buddha Dhamma (or just want to look at the
essential fundamentals, see, “Essential Buddhism“.
2. First, for those who are familiar with Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism), I like to point out that three
main misconceptions are prevalent today. They not only block the path to Nibbāna, but are micchā
diṭṭhi that could be responsible for rebirth in the apāyas. I am not trying to scare anyone, but “making
adhamma to be dhamma is a serious offense”.
§ Misinterpretation of anicca, dukkha, anatta: “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong
Interpretations“.
§ Misinterpretation of breath meditation as Ānāpānasati: “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“.
§ Insisting that the gandhabba (manomaya kāya) is a Mahayana concept: “Gandhabba State –
Evidence from Tipiṭaka“.
§ These misconceptions are not the fault of current Theravadins; they have been handed down for
many hundreds of years as explained in the “Historical Background“. However, it makes no
sense to adhere to them when solid evidence is presented, per above posts and many
others at this website.
§ Of course, no one should be able to insist, “this is the only truth, and nothing else is the truth”,
but the truth can be verified to one’s satisfaction by critically examining the evidence. I am
open to discuss any valid contrary evidence. We need to sort out the truth for the benefit of all.
3. Now, let us discuss which sections could be of interest to people with different backgrounds on
their exposure to Buddha Dhamma.
§ The “Moral Living and Fundamentals” section is a good start for anyone, since the
fundamentals of Buddha Dhamma are discussed. In particular, the subsections, “Buddha
Dhamma and Buddhism” and “Dhamma Concepts” could be informative.
§ The subsection on “Working Towards Good Rebirths” broadens the concepts discussed in the
above subsection, to indicate how one’s actions need to tailored to seek rebirths in higher
realms, and to avoid births in the lower realms (apāyas), in case one is unable to attain any
stages of Nibbāna in this life.
§ Even those who have had exposure to “Buddhism” may realize that some fundamental aspects
have been misrepresented in many text books as well as in various websites.
4. The “Buddha Dhamma” section is a bit more advanced version of the above mentioned section. It
discusses the basis of the Buddha Dhamma, i.e., the importance of purifying one’s mind in the first
few posts.
§ The Buddha described a wider world of 31 realms of which we are aware of only two: the
animal and human realms: “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ Then it discusses how the Buddha was able to see that “bigger picture” in the post, “Buddha
Dhamma: Non-Perceivability and Self-Consistency“.
§ The two posts “Sansaric Time Scale” and “Evidence for Rebirth” discuss how we have been
going through birth/death/rebirth process from a beginning-less time.
5. Those who have had exposure mainly to “Mahayana Buddhism”, the following two posts will
provide an idea of why Mahayana sutrās are very different from the suttās that the Buddha delivered:
“Saddharma Pundarika Sutra (Lotus Sutra) – A Focused Analysis” and “What is Sunyata or Sunnata
(Emptiness)?“.
§ Further details on how various “schools of Buddhism” — like Mahayana, Vajrayana (Tibetan),
Zen, etc — evolved within the first 1000 years after the Buddha, can be found in the “Historical
Background” section.
6. Even Theravāda Buddhism — which is supposed to be closest to the original teachings of the
Buddha — has been contaminated over the years, mainly due to three key reasons. We will first list
those three and discuss a bit more. First reason is to do with losing the true interpretations of ten
types of micchā diṭṭhi (wrong views).
§ There are two types of Eightfold Paths: mundane and transcendental (lokuttara). One needs to
first get into the mundane Path by getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi; see, “Buddha
Dhamma – In a Chart” and “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
§ One of the ten micchā diṭṭhi is “para loka or the world of gandhabba does not exist”. Many
people think that gandhabba is a Mahayana concept, but that is a big mistake; see below.
§ One cannot even get into the mundane Eightfold Path if one believes that para loka and
gandhabba are not real.
7. Second, various Hindu meditation techniques — including kasina and breath mediation — were
incorporated into Theravāda teachings especially after Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga; see,
“Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“, and the posts referred to there.
8. Third and most important reason is the incorrect translation of key Pāli words like anicca and
anatta by the Early European scholars in the 1800’s, see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by
Early European Scholars“.
§ Let us discuss each of those three briefly next, and point to a few more relevant posts.
9. Many people don’t realize that the concept of gandhabba (mental body) is a critical component in
explaining how life functions in human and animal realms.
§ First, it is a misconception that gandhabba is a Mahayana concept; see, “Antarabhava and
Gandhabba” and “Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka“.
§ Without the concepts of gandhabba, it is not possible to explain so many rebirth stories and out-of-
body experiences that have been widely reported in recent years; see, “Evidence for Rebirth” and
“Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“.
§ The main opposition to the concept of gandhabba in current Theravāda circles is the misconception
that it is an “antarābhava“, i.e., in between two bhava. But a human gandhabba is in the same
“human bhava“. This is clarified in, “Antarabhava and gandhabba“.
§ The critical role of the mental body (gandhabba) in giving rise to multiple births (jāti) within
human and animal existences (bhava) has been disregarded. However, not believing in the
existence of gandhabba is a micchā diṭṭhi, and is a hindrance to attain the Sotāpanna stage; see,
“Miccā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ Because of the high importance, gandhabba is discussed in two main sections: “Mental Body –
Gandhabba” and “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“.
10. Regarding the problems with Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga — published 1500 years ago — the
two issues mentioned above are:
§ Regarding kasina mediations discussed in the Visuddhimagga, there is not a single sutta in the
Tipiṭaka that discusses kasina mediation.
§ Regarding the breath meditation discussed in the Visuddgimagga, there are no suttās in the
Tipiṭaka that discusses BREATH MEDITATION. Those suttās have been mistranslated.
Furthermore, there is a sutta in the Tipiṭaka that specifically says breath meditation is not
Ānāpānasati meditation, see, “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“.
11. The critical problem of incorrect translation of anicca and anatta has prevented so many people
from making progress over the past 200 years. I strongly recommend the post, “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ More posts on that can be found in the section, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“. Correct
interpretation of many relevant key suttās are discussed in that section.
§ The introductory timeline on those historical developments is given in “Incorrect Theravāda
Interpretations – Historical Timeline“, and all relevant posts are in the “Historical Background”
section.
12. Now let us turn to an issue of relevance to many who are new to Buddha Dhamma. Many people
— especially in Western countries — have a hard time in believing in rebirth; see, “Buddhism
without Rebirth and Nibbāna?“.
§ The section, “Living Dhamma“, is especially designed for one to start following Buddha
Dhamma even without believing in the concept of rebirth.
§ The first two subsections there are good to be read by everyone. One can experience a real
“cooling down” even without having belief in rebirth.
§ The latter subsections gradually take one to advanced concepts, and latter sections are
appropriate even for people with advanced background on Buddha Dhamma. One would be
able to clarify advanced concepts in latter subsections.
13. Once one start looking into Buddha Dhamma seriously, it is a good idea to learn a few basic
things about the Pāli language. The Pāli Canon, which was first transmitted orally and then was
written down 2000 years ago, still has all the suttās as composed by the Buddha and memorized by
Ven. Ānanda.
§ See, “Preservation of the Dhamma” and other relevant posts in the “Historical Background“.
§ While the Buddha encouraged delivering Dhamma to others in their native language, there are
some advantages in learning at least some key Pāli words, see, “Why is it Necessary to Learn
Key Pāli Words?“.
§ In particular, learning the meanings behind some key roots like “san” makes a huge difference
in gaining understanding of key words like saṃsāra and sammā, see, the subsection on “San“.
14. Learning the correct meanings of the suttās in the Tipiṭaka is an essential part of learning Buddha
Dhamma. Most existing literature, even on Theravāda, have incorrect translations.
§ The section “Sutta Interpretations” discusses some key suttās in the Tipiṭaka.
§ It is a good idea to first read two important posts in that section, “Sutta – Introduction” and
“Pāli Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
§ Short and succinct sayings of the Buddha in the Dhammapada provide deep insights in short
verses. Some of these are discussed in the “Dhammapada” section.
15. Meditation (both formal and informal) is an essential part of following the Path of the Buddha.
The “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” provides a series of posts on the fundamentals of meditation and also on
advanced topics.
§ A critical misconception that is prevalent today is Ānāpānasati bhāvanā is breath mediation.
There are several posts that discusses the correct version and the post, “Is Ānāpānasati Breath
Meditation?” discusses evidence from the Tipiṭaka that breath mediation is not Ānāpāna.
§ The Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā is discussed in the subsection, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
16. Buddha Dhamma is based on the principle of causation (cause and effect), which in Pāli is
Paṭicca Samuppāda. The principles are discussed in the section, “Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ While the meaning of Paṭicca Samuppāda is clear from its name itself, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“, the main concepts are discussed in plain English at: “Paṭicca
Samuppāda in Plain English“.
§ Just because causes exist, does not necessarily mean that effects (results) will follow. There
must be suitable conditions present to about those results (also called vipāka). This is discussed
in detail in the subsection “Paṭṭhāna Dhamma“.
17. Chanting of suttās and reciting the virtues of Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha can prepare one’s mind
to be receptive to learn Dhamma, and thus could be an important part of the practice, see, “Buddhist
Chanting“.
§ The section on “Myths or Realities?” is also important, since it discusses many concepts and
practices that are considered by some to not belong to Buddha Dhamma.
18. Those who would like to see how compatible Buddha Dhamma is with modern science,
“Dhamma and Science” section is a good resource.
§ That section points out both consistencies and inconsistencies with modern science.
§ Modern science has had to revise or come up new theories to explain many phenomena over the
past 500 years, but Buddha Dhamma (in the Tipiṭaka) has remained the same over 2500 years.
§ My prediction is that in the end the remaining inconsistencies will also be resolved in favor of
Buddha Dhamma.
19. The section on “Tables and Summaries” is an important collection of posts summarizing bits of
information or “data” that are not necessary to be memorized, but could be needed to explain things
in detail.
§ There are several posts with listings of types of citta, cetasika, 28 types rūpa, etc. in this
section.
§ There is also a Pāli glossary with pronunciation: “Pāli Glossary – (A-K)” and “Pāli Glossary –
(L-Z)“.
§ The section on “Comments/Reviews” has two subsections on “Discussion of Comments” and
“Book Reviews“.
20. There are some who either have already learned Abhidhamma, or would like to learn. For them,
the “Abhidhamma” section could be useful. There are several subsections in this section on various
topics.
§ The section on “Inconsistencies with Science” highlights some overlaps between Abhidhamma
Science.
§ One of my favorite subjects is Abhidhamma. When one has proceeded along the Path to some
extent, it could be useful to learn Abhidhamma, which will help gain a deeper understanding.
21. Finally, but most importantly, there are three important subsections that discusses issues involved
in attaining magga phala (stages of Nibbāna). The primary goal of this website is to provide enough
material for one to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
§ First, the concept of Nibbāna is a puzzle to many. It is discussed in several posts in the
subsection: “Nibbāna“.
§ Some critical points to consider by those who are making effort in that direction are discussed
in the subsection: “Seeking Nibbāna“.
§ The first goal of those who seek Nibbāna is the Sotāpanna stage. Many concepts are
requirements for achieving that goal are discussed in the subsection: “Sotāpanna Stage of
Nibbāna“.
§ The section, “Living Dhamma“, is especially designed for one to start following Buddha
Dhamma even without believing in the concept of rebirth, all the way to the Sotāpanna stage.
People with more advanced background can start at later subsections, skipping the early ones.
Revised on January 16, 2016 (item #4); major revision September 12, 2018; revised August 7,
2019
Introduction
1. Many people, who are to a bit of Buddha Dhamma, see that there is something good about it. So,
they just go to a meditation retreat and try to get a dose of Dhamma over several days.
§ It is good to do that initially. But there is much more to Dhamma than to attain some temporary
relief from the stresses of this life. If one can see that, then one needs to spend a bit more time
and learn the full message of the Buddha.
2. If we learn the laws of motion from someone who does not really understand them, it is harder to
digest. We may even learn them incorrectly, in the case of a bit harder subject, say, relativity. If the
person who explains does not have a good understanding of the theory of relativity, then it is likely
that the person who learns it will not learn much.
§ I have not only learned Buddha Dhamma, but have practiced it over the past ten years, and have
seen the benefits for myself.
§ As a scientist, I am amazed at the depth of Buddha Dhamma. You will be able to see what I
mean if you spend some time here.
A Wider World View
3. Benefits from Buddha Dhamma or the “worldview of the Buddha” can be two-fold.
§ First, is the spiritual aspect. One will be able to experience “peace of mind” even by reading
and learning, but when one starts comprehending the critical message of the Buddha, that can
have a profound impact.
§ Second, is the “intellectual aspect”. Buddha Dhamma thoroughly explains the “laws of Nature.”
I have spent ten years studying it, and I am still learning. Once one starts digging deeper, one
will see that modern science is far behind.
4. As I build up this site, anyone will be able to see that Buddha Dhamma is the ultimate Grand
Unified Theory; see “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ It explains everything not only that we can see, but also the existence of infinite number of
worlds with living beings in 29 other realms of existence. We can only see the human and
animal realms.
§ Thus Buddha Dhamma is not a religion in the sense of providing salvation. Buddha was not a
God, a prophet or a messenger. He was a human being who purified his mind to perfection so
that he could see the whole of existence. He was the perfect scientist, who investigated the
problem of life and found the complete solution. We all need to find our salvation by following
the Path that he prescribed to purify our minds.
Why Are There So Many Versions of Buddhism?
5. Thus Buddhism (Buddha Dhamma) is the most elaborate theory of “this world.” It is called “pubbe
anunussetu dhammesu” or a “Dhamma (or a theory on nature) that is not known to the world before a
Buddha comes along.” The Buddha uttered this phrase multiple times in his first sutta; see,
“Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta – Introduction.”
§ However, it has “evolved” into many different versions since the Buddha Gotama revealed it to
the world over 2500 years ago.
§ During the past 2500 years many different versions of “Buddhism” have emerged; see,
“Historical Background – Introduction.” No one can claim, “this is the original version that was
delivered by the Buddha.” It is up to each individual to examine different versions and decide
which version makes sense.
§ Thus it pays to spend some time and try to find the version(s) closest to the original. This is not
an easy task these days.
§ My goal is to present the closest version that I found. It is up to you to examine it and see
whether you agree.
§ I content that is in the Pāli Tipiṭaka, not Sanskrit sutras, and not in Buddhaghosa’s
Visuddhimagga. I have pointed out the inconsistencies in both Mahāyāna version and also in
the current Theravāda versions with Visuddhimagga as the basis; see, “Historical Background”
section.
Key Concepts of Buddhism
6. It will be quite beneficial to read the “Moral Living and Fundamentals” section to get an idea of
the basic principles.
§ One cannot even begin to follow Buddha Dhamma unless one learns about the key concepts,
see “Key Dhamma Concepts“.
§ The first stage of Nibbāna (Sotāpanna stage) is attained just by fully comprehending the “world
view of the Buddha.” Then one clearly sees the fruitlessness of seeking lasting happiness in
“this world” of 31 realms.
7. It is necessary to find out what the central message of the Buddha was. It is essential to read the
section, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
§ It is also important to realize that dukkha is not the feeling of suffering; that is dukha; see,
“Does the First Noble Truth Describe only Suffering?.”
§ If one did not know that he was talking about a much “bigger world” than the world we directly
experience, one would think of that statement as nonsensical. The laws of kammā do not make
sense unless one at least knows that the Buddha was talking about a rebirth process that has no
beginning.
8. Newton discovered the three laws of motion which helped describe gravity. Instead of re-
discovering them, we learn them at school. We have to learn them from a teacher. But if the teacher
does not know the material well, then a student will not be able to learn the correct laws of motion.
§ One needs to learn from a true disciple of the Buddha, one who has not only studied it, but also
has experienced the benefits.
§ Even though I use some “science examples”, there is no need to know any science. A science
background may be helpful mainly in the “Dhamma and Science” sections, but even there it is
not necessary.
§ The new section on “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma” is more suitable for those who have at
least a high-school background in physics.
The Big Picture
9. Before one embarks on a journey, one needs to know what the trip is about, and what the
destination is. Furthermore, whether it is worthwhile to undertake the trip. Please be patient and first
find out what Buddha Dhamma is about, the big picture, first. Please spend some time learning about
the key message of the Buddha, before undertaking the journey. If one does not know where one is
going (or the terrain), how can one reach the destination?
§ Buddha Dhamma describes the true nature of “this world.” But “this world” does not just mean
our life as a human. “This world” is unimaginably complex. Scientists admit that they are aware
of only 4% of the things in this universe; see, “The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark
Energy, and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality”, by Richard Panek (2011). Also see,
“Dhamma and science” section for details.
§ Please be patient and scan through the main sections to get a brief idea first. Getting the “whole
picture” will take time, see, “User’s Guide to Pure Dhamma Website.”
10. The next question (especially when one sees that it is indeed a complex picture) that comes to
one’s mind is that “How do I know this picture is right?”. One makes that decision based on one’s
own experience. But even before that, one could get an good idea by treating Buddha Dhamma as a
scientific theory. That is why the section on “Dhamma and Science” is useful.
§ Please pay special attention to the rebirth process. Many people wonder why rebirth bad. But
they do not realize that the chance of rebirth as a human is extremely rare; see, “How the
Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
§ One must also realize that jāti (birth) and bhava (existence in a given realm) are two different
things; see, “Bhava and Jathi – State of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ Most are reborn in planes below the human realm where suffering is much worse. Scientists
estimate that at any given time, there are one quadrillion (1000 trillion) ants living on Earth;
this means for each human, there are million ants. Compared to about 7 billion of human
population, an incredible number of other living species live on this planet.
§ Even on our bodies, we carry a large number of sentient beings: see, “There are as many
creatures on your body as there are people on Earth!“.
§ The human population is insignificantly small compared to the animal population. Statistically,
that gives an idea of “probability of a human birth”. We do not see the much higher populations
in the other lower three realms because our minds are covered by defilement. If one develops
jhānas and acquires abhiññā powers, one can see beings in some of those realms.
Is Buddhism Pessimistic?
11. Many people think Buddha Dhamma is pessimistic. The Buddha just revealed the suffering in
“this world” and that it can be overcome;; see, “Does the First Noble Truth Describe only Suffering?
.”
§ He showed that there is a better type of happiness, called nirāmisa sukha, that one gains as one
moves away from “this world” towards Nibbāna; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is
Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ This nirāmisa sukha increases gradually as one starts on the Noble Eightfold Path, and makes
quantum jump at the first stage of Nibbāna, the Stream Entry (Sotāpanna) stage. There are
three more levels, and at the final level, Arahant, one becomes free from “this world” (no more
rebirths) and attains Nibbāna.
§ Thus Nibbāna is not just a promise to be fulfilled at death; it can be experienced in this very
life. I invite you to take this journey with me for a while and see for yourself. As the Buddha
said, “Come and see for yourself” [Dhamma quality: ehipassiko].
12. My goal is to provide at least some details of the complex world view that was provided by the
Buddha, which has been been muddled and distorted within the past 2500 years.
§ “Our world” is much more complicated than what is grasped by our senses; see, “The Grand
Unified Theory of Dhamma.”
§ And our lives do not end with this one; see, “Evidence for Rebirth.”
§ Those two facts constitute the basis of the true nature of existence. One cannot comprehend the
message of the Buddha until one at least has some idea about this “big picture.”
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Buddha Dhamma 13
§ Many questions people have on concepts like kamma, morality, Nibbāna, etc, as well as
philosophical questions like “why I am here?”, or “why is the world the way it is?”, will have
answers within this big picture. It is a complete world view, but it is up to each individual to
determine whether it makes sense. As the Buddha pointed out, the stakes are very high, and it is
a good idea to take time and critically evaluate this big picture.
For a more comprehensive “bottom-up” approach, see the new post of April 12, 2018: “Buddha
Dhamma for an Inquiring Mind – Part I.”
Next, “Foundation of Dhamma“,………..
If you have not read the introductory post, “What is Buddha Dhamma?“, please read that first. It
describes the unique aspects of Buddha Dhamma, in the sense that it is not a religion by some
definitions and the Buddha was not a savior.
1. There are two co-existing facets of Buddha Dhamma:
§ The Buddha said, “This Dhamma is unlike anything that the world has ever seen”. It really
needs a paradigm change to get into the “new perspective about this world view of the
Buddha”. One needs to be able to put aside all preconceived notions to understand the core
message.
§ However, the Buddha also said, “My Dhamma is good in the beginning, good in the middle,
and good at the end”. There is something to be gained from Buddha Dhamma for people who
just come to know about it to those who have really grasped the core concepts. This is why I
have separated posts into three categories on the site.
§ Many important terms, even whole suttas, can be interpreted at several levels, ranging from
superficial to very deep meanings. As I build the site, I will try to give some examples. For
example, the five precepts have much deeper meanings than the ones that are apparent. It is
gratifying, and exhilarating, to see deeper meanings as one progresses. Thus, there is something
to be gained at any level.
2. There are three basic ways to practice Dhamma:
§ At the very basic level (see, “Moral Living and Fundamentals“), one can find happiness or
misery in this life itself according to the way one lives one’s life. One whose actions are
harmful to oneself or the others will be living in misery. Someone may seem to be living in
luxury, but could be living in misery. We know about many wealthy/famous people who even
committed suicide.
§ At the next level, one leads a moral life and accumulates good kamma that could lead to a good
life in the next birth. However, we need to keep in mind that even if one does not commit a
single bad kamma, the next birth could be a bad one due to “bad kamma seeds” from previous
lives; see, “Working Towards Good Rebirths“.
§ At the highest level, one will act to remove all defilements from one’s mind so that the mind
becomes liberated from the body which causes all suffering. Thus one will be working to
achieve Nibbāna, the unconditioned, permanent happiness; see, “Seeking Nibbāna“.
3. The site is organized at those three levels:
§ Most people intuitively know the benefit of a moral life. Dhamma will help understand why,
and even point to some possible improvements.
§ When one lives a moral life and EXPERIENCES the benefit of that, one will be automatically
drawn to think about whether there is a life after death. One reads about the evidence
for/against this possibility. If the answer is “yes”, then one can find possible ways to work
towards a better life in the next birth. This is not much different from the moral behavior in
above. It is just that one will learn a lot about “the world” that we live in.
§ Once the second stage is achieved, some may want to at least explore the third stage. This is
THE message of the Buddha, that no matter where one is born in the next life, there are NO
guarantees that the lives after that will be suffering free. This is the path to Nibbāna, to cease
suffering permanently.
4. Going straight to the third level will be like trying to get into high school without finishing the
primary and secondary schooling.
§ However, even if one has not even heard anything about Buddha Dhamma before, some may be
already at the second stage, and few may even be ready for the third stage. This life did not start
at this birth. Each of us have come a long way and have molded our character through countless
lives in the past. Thus, even if one is unaware of it, one may already be mentally prepared to
tackle the third stage. So, please look around and find a starting point that you are comfortable
with; see, “Where to Start on the Path?“. Only you know about yourself!
5. It is critical to realize that “knowledge” is not perfect at any level as long as one remains “in this
world”. Even though he was not talking about that, the famous physicist Richard Feynman illustrates
this point well in this video:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Feynman Magnets and Why questions
Let us take his example of someone slipping on ice. A drunk person stepping onto ice-covered
surface does not even realize that it is icy and slippery. At the next level, an alert person knows that
the surface is slippery, and thus will be careful. But if one needs to know why the icy-surface is
slippery, then a bit of basic physics is needed to understand “why ice is slippery”. It is not necessary
to understand “why ice is slippery” if one has an uncontaminated mind; a sober person with a calm
mind will take precautions when stepping on a icy surface. More complex situations require the
cleansing of an “average mind” further. This is where Buddha Dhamma makes a difference.
6. Even though humans have an innate sense of what is right and what is wrong, human mind is
polluted by the five hindrances (see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances”).
§ Once Dhamma Theory is understood, just that understanding leads to the clearing up of some of
these hindrances; furthermore, the logic of a moral life comes naturally out the Dhamma
Theory. This understanding of the Dhamma Theory or at least some idea of what the basic
foundations of Buddha Dhamma is CRITICAL and should be done before one starts
“practicing” Dhamma.
§ If one living a moral life reads about the Dhamma Theory, he/she may be motivated to explore
the second stage, i.e., to think about the validity of the process of rebirth, which is a major
axiom of Buddha Dhamma.
§ When one LIVES a life with the belief that what one does in this life will affect how one will
fare after this life, then one may realize the danger in this traversing this endless cycles of
rebirths. That will lead to exploring the third stage, which is THE real message of the Buddha.
7. No one can take anyone else to any meaningful mundane happiness with nirāmisa sukha (in this
life or next) or to Nibbāna.
§ The Buddha said, “Attā hi attano nātho, ko hi nātho paro siyā”, or ,”One indeed is one’s own
refuge; how can others be a refuge to one?” .
§ Each one has one’s own mind. And that is what is needed to be purified in order to attain a
peaceful life now, a better life in the next, or even Nibbāna. But others CAN help.
§ It is entirely up to the individual. This site will help one find the right path.
Analysis of a given situation always needs to be taken in the proper context. Let us again listen to Dr.
Feynman’s video that was in the previous post.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Feynman Magnets and Why questions
It is worthwhile to discuss the case of an icy surface to look a bit deeper than even Dr. Feynman did.
He merely pointed out that there is no end to the sort of questions especially when a child keeps
asking: “what is the reason for that?” at every step: “Why is Aunt Mimi in the hospital?” leads to the
answer, “She fell on ice”. Then, “Why did she fall on ice?” leads to “Because ice is slippery”, which
leads to, “Why is ice (and not concrete) slippery ?”.
Up to this point, the child (or an average adult) can understand each answer, BECAUSE based on
their life experiences all those answers make sense. But the last question cannot be answered to the
complete satisfaction of a child or an average adult, who does not have a background in physics:
Unlike most other solids, ice has this peculiar property that when water is cooled, it expands when
turning into ice. So, when Aunt Mimi stepped on ice, the pressure of her weight caused ice to shrink
(i.e., become water), and thus a thin layer of water was formed between her shoes and ice, which
causes her to slide and fall. Other solids tend to get more hardened under pressure, so there no
slipping due to that particular cause.
§ Now one DOES NOT need to know that bit of physics to avoid falling on ice. What was needed
to avoid falling was to have a keen sense of knowing that ice is slippery and needed to take
necessary precautions.
§ May be Aunt Mimi was in an agitated state of mind and hurried out of the door without
realizing that there was a thin sheet of ice on the driveway. If she was drunk, that would have
also lead to the same result. If she was in a calm, relaxed state of mind, she would have been
more careful.
§ An agitated mind can be caused by excess greed and hate too. Most people do not realize this,
but if we think back each of us can remember instances where we made bad decisions because
of greedy or hateful state of mind. This is why getting into heated arguments can be risky, and
people even kill in a moment of rage.
What the Buddha tried to convey was that we can truly understand the real nature of “this world” by
“clearing up our minds”. There are five things called hindrances that cause our minds to be clouded;
see, “Key to Calming the Mind – Five Hindrances“. These have accumulated via bad habits that we
have developed over countless lives; see, for example, “The Law of Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and
Cravings (Āsavas)“.
§ Each one has a different set of bad habits, but we all have them. Yet we can function “in this
world” with that “baseline”(for example not fall while walking on ice), if we do not make it
worse by substance abuse, making the mind agitated (by getting angry or overly greedy), etc.
Thus what all of us would normally do is to live our lives in this “baseline state of the mind” which
does not allow us to see the true nature of “this world”. We are just carried by the tide without us
trying to examine whether it is good idea to “just go with the flow”, do our best to make our lives
better, and eventually die without knowing that all those life struggles were in vain at the end.
The worse thing is that the story does not end at death, but just moves on to another phase (rebirth),
where we will be doing exactly the same again.
§ We have gone through this unending process for innumerable lives, and most those have been
much worse than our current human life. When one “sees” the fruitlessness of our struggles to
seek happiness in a “world” that is inherently not able to provide that, then one will seek to get
out of “this world” by following the Noble Eightfold Path of the Buddha, and achieve
permanent happiness.
§ This is the crux of the message of the Buddha.
We will be able to “see” the truth of what was said in the above paragraph (i.e., the true nature of
“this world”), if we start cleaning our minds to get rid of the five hindrances (see, “Key to Calming
the Mind - The five Hindrances” ).
But to do that, first we need to be able to look at the wider view of “this world” of the Buddha. Many
people plunge into “practicing Dhamma” without even having an idea of the “world view” of the
Buddha. How can one practice, if one does not know what the goal of the practice is? The goal
could be three fold:
i. to gain some kind of a peaceful state of mind in this life
ii. looking at a more longer range, to make sure one will have a better life also in the upcoming
births,
iii. to be released from this cycle of rebirths filled with dissatisfaction, and to seek permanent
happiness, Nibbāna.
If the goal is one of the above three (and especially if (ii) and (iii)), then one needs to know what
the complete “world view” of the Buddha was: This is the Buddha Dhamma.
It has been over 2500 years since the Buddha declared his message about the previously unknown
wider world view. This has been distorted over these intervening time, and my goal is to provide a
more sensible, logical view that is based on Theravāda version.
Since many are “just looking”, and have no reason to believe the truth of this world view, I am going
to present it as a theory. We will be continually testing this theory to see whether it meets the
established scientific standards, because that is what I am used to as a scientist.
§ Many people, especially in the earlier times, made that decision on the enhanced
EXPERIENCE as they followed the Path; as one moves along the Path, this EXPERIENCE
starts to transcend the sensory experience. There is crucial difference between the empiricism
based on the sensory experience (which was the philosophical doctrine promoted by John
Locke and others in the early days of scientific revolution), and the vastly enhanced
experience of a purified mind.
Now, once one understands what this wider world view is, then one can see that the solution to our
problem existence does not depend on trying to probe deeper into “What is the reason for that?” at
each step in an endless loop. We just do not have enough time in this life to learn all that.
§ Rather it is just a matter of purifying our minds, so that the mind can “see” through one’s own
refined experience as one follows the Path.
Put succinctly, the Buddha discovered that the solution to the problem of the existence is to “see” the
true nature of “this world”; this is even more complex than what the science is finding out.
§ But one only needs to see that “whole picture” and to realize that no matter where we are born,
we will never find long lasting happiness “in this world”, because “this world” is inherently of
the nature of ever-changing.
§ Everything “in this world” is in a constant flux, but we cannot “see” that because our minds are
cluttered with the five hindrances.
Now let us take look at the other approach for “finding out all about this world”. This is the scientific
approach (There are other religious approaches too, but I am going to stay away from that subject).
This scientific approach started with the ancient Greeks, about at the same time that the Buddha
lived.
§ So, we have two approaches: the Buddha’s is totally mind-based; the scientific method is
matter-based.
§ Currently, most scientists are trying to figure out how the mind works in terms of the workings
of brain, thought of as a very sophisticated computer. The Buddha Dhamma is completely
consistent with the material aspects of science (as we will discuss), but in Buddha
Dhamma, mind actually precedes matter; matter is secondary.
Let us go back to the case of slipping on ice that was discussed in Dr. Feynman’s video. In order to
cope with an icy surface, all we need to know is to have prior EXPERIENCE with such a surface, and
an alert mind (that is not distracted by alcohol, anger, lust, etc) to use that experience to cope with the
situation. This is the mind approach.
§ When one carefully examines the “world view” within the Buddha Dhamma, one will be able to
see that the problem of the existence is reduced to understanding the ever-changing nature of
the world, without examining each part in minute detail. ALL PARTS of this world are of
impermanent nature, and thus one can never maintain anything to one’s liking for long times.
§ That is all one needs to perceive, to really understand, not just to read about. This simple
task is the hardest; that is what requires an effort. But first one needs to read about this
“world view”.
On the other hand, one could keep going down the line of questions probing deeper to the causes as to
why ice is slippery, why does water expand when it is cooled, the nature of chemical bonds, about
electrons and protons, about quarks that make up those protons, etc.
§ It is quite true that this probing has led to many technological advances that we all enjoy today.
I can write something on this site and get it to you within minutes; it is amazing and very
beneficial. But my point is that all this “probing deeper” has not gotten us any closer to the
questions on the existence. Right now science is approaching the limits of this probing,
because now we know that all matter is just energy.
§ And even though we may benefit from the technological advances, such benefits can be
enjoyed only for a brief moment (about 100 years) in the sansāric time scale. Buddha Dhamma
provides a long-term solution.
What the Buddha stated 2500 years ago was that, in the end, there is no benefit in probing deeper into
material properties as far as one’s existence is concerned. All one needs to realize is that no matter
what we achieve, they are all transitory, not stable. This cannot be done without purifying one’s
mind.
§ When one truly comprehends the three characteristics of existence (see, “Anicca – True
Meanings“), and thus the unsatisfactory nature of this existence, one will not seek to gain
“material things” but will endeavor to achieve Nibbāna. This only requires purification of
one’s mind. It does not require examining the outside material world in detail.
§ When one goes deeper into the Buddha Dhamma, it becomes clear that mind energy is the basis
of all existence. But that is a long story. We first need to get started and see whether the
“broader world view” of the Buddha makes sense.
Next, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“,………
Revised May 20, 2016; December 22, 2018; July 6, 2019; August 21, 2019
1. According to Buddha Dhamma, EVERYTHING in existence can be put into four ultimate realities
(paramatthatho):
§ Thoughts (citta)
§ Thought qualities or mental factors (cetasika)
§ Matter (rūpa)
§ Nibbāna
These entities described in detail in the Tables and Summaries and Abhidhamma sections; see,
“Abhidhamma – Introduction.”
§ All existence “in this world” described in terms of the first three. And they are all conditional;
each is born due to the presence of a cause. If there is no cause, none of these three will arise.
That is the fundamental cause and effect (paṭicca samuppāda) in Buddha Dhamma.
§ Causes are numerous, but the root causes are six: greed, hate, ignorance, non-greed, non-hate,
and non-ignorance.
§ Nibbāna and those other three entities are mutually exclusive (things in this world are absent in
Nibbāna); see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamanibbānapaṭisaṃyutta Sutta (Ud 8.1)” (English
translation: “WebLink: suttacentral: The First Discourse about Nibbāna”).
2. Nibbāna results with the removal of the three roots of greed, hate, ignorance (rāgakkhyo,
dosakkhayo, mohakkhayo Nibbānaṃ).
§ It is necessary to cultivate the three moral roots non-greed, non-hate, and non-ignorance first
while in the mundane eightfold path. That allows one to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa (anicca,
dukkha, anatta) and get to the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart.”
§ Therefore, one strives to remove greed, hate, and ignorance, which are “san“; see, “What is
‘San’?.” That is the key to Nibbāna, as laid out in the Noble Eightfold Path.
3. The citta arise and decay at a fast rate: billions of citta can arise and pass away each second. But as
we will see in the Abhidhamma section, “active thoughts” occur relatively infrequently in “fast
bursts” or citta vīthi. Cetasika is “embedded” in each citta. There are 89 types of cittas in all, and 52
types of cetasikas; see, “Tables and Summaries.” Thus the mental realm is very complicated.
§ For an introduction to the mind, see “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta),”
“The Amazing Mind – Critical Role of Nāmagotta (Memories),” and “Do I Have “A Mind”
That Is Fixed and “Mine”?” in that order.
4. Matter (rūpa) constitutes of 28 basic units, of which only four are truly fundamental. However, the
smallest indivisible unit is called a “suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]”; see, “Rūpa – Generation
Mechanisms” and “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka].” These suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] have very long lifetimes of a mahā kalpa (basically the age of the universe).
Suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] are the building blocks of any “tangible thing” in this world.
§ Any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) in “this world” are subject to change. Each saṅkhata
(sankata in Sinhala) (basically any material things) has a lifetime which could be shorter than a
second or as long as billions of years (for a star for example).
5. Many people confuse “udayavaya” or “formation and breakup of saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)”
means anything, including suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], is perpetually in flux. They try to tie this
with “impermanence” which they incorrectly translate anicca to be. In the contrary, suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] have very long lifetimes.
§ It is only those “composites” such as humans, animals, trees, etc, that undergo decay and death
at time scales that are discernible to us; a gold bar, does not decay for a very long time; see,
“Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?.”
§ For a discussion on udayavaya nana, see, “Udayavaya Ñāṇa.”
6. The “result” of this udayavaya nature of all saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) embedded in the Three
Characteristics of “this world”: anicca, dukkha, anatta. But anicca is NOT impermanence, and anatta
is NOT “no-self”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations.”
§ Briefly, (i) it is not possible to find AND maintain happiness in anything in “this world.” (ii)
Because of that, we become distraught and suffer, and (iii) Thus, one becomes helpless (not in
control). It is essential to realize that these are characterize of not just this life, but our
beginning-less rebirth process in “this wider world” of 31 realms described below.
§ Even though gold bars are virtually permanent relative to our lifetimes, we still cannot
“maintain it to our satisfaction.” That is because we have to leave it (and anything else) behind
when we die.
§ And all this is due to “udayavaya” of saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), all that we experience; see,
“Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata.”
7. Therefore, there is NOTHING “in this world” that is permanent (except “nama gotta“; see
below). Everything is constantly changing. That is the fundamental reason why nothing in “this
world” will meet one’s expectations; see, “Second Law of Thermodynamics is Part of Anicca!.”
§ Some things can last longer than others, but nothing is permanent. Anything is
CONDITIONAL, i.e., arises due to causes. It would not come to existence in the absence of
root causes. Thus it is said that everything “in this world” is CONDITIONED.
§ The only exception is “nama gotta,” which are the permanent records of a given “lifestream”;
see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM).” That is how one with
abhiññā powers can go back and look at one’s past lives; some children can recall their past
lives too. That record is permanent.
8. This world made of citta, cetasika, and rūpa is very complicated. Living beings can be born in 31
realms out of which we can “see” only two realms: human and animal.
§ Think about the fact that all biological matter arises from just four bases of DNA, and all
computer codes based on two units, 0 and 1. Thus, one could see how complex the mind is
when there are 89 types of cittas, and 52 types of cetasikas are involved!
§ The sixth through eleventh shells represent the realms of the devas (wrongly translated as gods
by many). Devas do not have dense bodies with flesh and blood, and thus, they do not have the
physical ailments. They do not generate greedy thoughts.
2. The next 16 shells represent realms where only two physical sense faculties (eye and ear) are
active, in addition to mind. These beings have very fine bodies, even less dense than devas. These are
called rūpa lokas.
3. The last four shells represent the arūpa lokas, where beings have ultra-fine bodies and only the
mind faculty; they do not have physical senses.
4. In rūpa and arūpa lokas, living beings are in jhānic states, and those beings do not have either
greed or hate; but they still have ignorance.
§ Humans can attain these jhānic states, and thus humans can “temporarily live” in those lokas;
see, “Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhānas.”
§ The 16 realms in the rūpa loka correspond to the four lower jhānas, and the four realms in the
arūpa loka correspond to the four higher jhānas.
5. Now, a lot of you may be thinking, “How do I know all this is true? Is there any evidence?”. There
are a lot of things we do not know about “this world”. We cannot rely on our senses or even science
to verify/confirm these; see, “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis” and “Dhamma
and Science.”
§ Only within the last 50 years or so that science has accepted that our universe has more than a
few galaxies (now science has confirmed that there are billions of galaxies!).
§ Furthermore, the newest findings (yet unconfirmed) in string theory indicate that we live in a
10-dimensional world (of course we cannot see the other spatial dimensions), not a 3-
dimensional world. For a fun look at different spatial dimensions, see, “Consciousness
Dependence on Number of Dimensions.”
6. Any living being (including each of us) has been in all realms in this beginningless saṃsāra. We
have been in the niraya (hell), and we have been at the highest (except the five pure abodes in rūpa
loka which can be accessed only by Anāgāmīs or Non-Returners).
7. Above the human realm, there is relatively less suffering (except at death, which is inevitable).
However, unless one has achieved at least the Stream Entry (Sotāpanna) stage, even a living being in
the highest plane can fall to any lower level. Therefore, a normal human is bound to end up in the
niraya (hell) at some point; once there one will spend a long agonizing time there and eventually
come out. Each of us has done this many times over. The cause of births in different realms is
explained in terms of “kamma seeds”; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“).
8. So, each living being moves from one realm to another, but spends most time in the four lower
worlds, mainly because once fallen there, it is hard to come out. This “sansāric wandering” is the
critical point to think about and comprehend.
9. As one moves away from the center, the level of suffering decreases, and the level of mundane
pleasure increases up to the 11th realm. After that in the rūpa and arūpa lokas it is mainly the jhānic
pleasures, not the sense pleasures; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?.”
10. The human realm and the animal realm are the only ones where a being is born to parents. In all
other realms, living beings are born instantaneously, formed fully, within an instant (cittakkhana) of
dying in the previous life. That is an opapātika birth. That is why the Buddha said, “mano
pubbangama dhamma………..“. The mind is the root cause, not matter.
§ As discussed in the Abhidhamma section, even the humans and animals start their “bhava”
opapatically as gandhabbas; see, “Manomaya Kāya.” They begin building a “dense physical
body” after getting into a womb.
11. A person who becomes an Arahant or attains Nibbāna, will not be reborn in any of these 31
realms. Thus, Nibbāna is not difficult to understand: see, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?”,
and “What are Rūpa? Relation to Nibbāna”, and other posts (by the way, you can type a keyword in
the “Search box” at top right to get a list of relevant posts).
§ Nibbāna, in the present model, corresponds to getting out of all 31 shells, out of the big sphere;
no more rebirth in any of the 31 realms. Nibbāna is where the permanent sukha or nirāmisa
sukha, is.
§ When one attains Nibbāna or Arahanthood, he/she looks just like any other human but has no
attachments to any worldly things. Until death, an Arahant is subjected to kamma vipāka. When
that kammic power is used up, he dies and is not reborn because he/she will not “willingly
grasp” (or “upādāna”) any of the possible births.
12. Why are we trapped in the 31 realms? Because we perceive that there is happiness to be had in
“this world.” We are not aware that there is much suffering in the lower four realms. Many people
look at their lives and say, “where is this suffering the Buddha was talking about?”: It is the hidden
suffering that is there not only in this world but mostly in the lowest four realms. The problem is that
once fallen there, it is hard to come back up. In those realms – animal realm included – beings are
more like robots. They do not have developed minds like humans.
§ No one or no external force is keeping us in “this world” of 31 realms. Content with sense
pleasures, do not see the suffering “in the long term” or even in this life as we get old. Thus we
are clinging to everything in this world like an octopus grabbing its prey with all eight
And we are not aware that there is a better kind of pleasure in Nibbāna, in detaching from
legs.
“this world”; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?.” (Also, unless a
Buddha comes along, we do not know about the 31 realms and are not aware of the suffering in
the lower four realms).
13. Can we taste Nibbānic “pleasure”?. Yes. We can feel it in increments, even below the Stream
Entry (Sotāpanna) stage; see, “How to Taste Nibbāna.” That is nirāmisa sukha, the “pleasure of
giving up worldly things.”
§ This nirāmisa sukha has “quantum jumps” (substantial instantaneous changes) at the four
stages of Nibbāna: Stream Entry, Once-Returner, Non-Returner, Arahant. Thus when one is on
the Path, one can experience nirāmisa sukha at varying degrees, all the way to Nibbānic bliss,
during this very lifetime; see, at the end of “The Four Stages in Attaining Nibbāna.”
14. All these 31 realms are in our solar system (cakkavāla or Chakrawāta in Sinhala). They are
associated with the Earth. There are billions of such cakkavāla (planetary systems) in existence at all
times with living beings.
§ These are in clusters of the small, medium, and large “world systems” (galaxies, galaxy
clusters, and superclusters?). But none is permanent. They come into being and eventually
perish. Within the past 100 years or so, scientists have confirmed the existence of billions of
planetary systems within each galaxy. And there are billions of such galaxies in our universe!.
We have been born in almost all of these realms in our sansāric journey that has no traceable
beginning.
Continues the discussion in , “Our Two Worlds: Material and Mental”, ……..
2.5.2 Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial
May 14, 2016; Revised November 25, 2016 (#3); September 30, 2019
1. Our “human world” is made of two types of worlds: Material world (living beings and inert
objects, sounds, smells, tastes, and body touches) that we experience with the five physical senses.
Then there is the “immaterial world” (dhamma, which includes concepts, memories, etc in addition to
kamma beeja with energy) that we experience with our minds. Here we use the phrase “immaterial
world” to describe those dhammā that can only be experienced with the mind.
§ These two worlds co-exist; all 31 realms share the immaterial world. The immaterial world is
like a fine fabric that connects all living beings. It is just that we cannot “see” the immaterial
world, while we can see most of the material world. There are many things that we cannot “see”
but we know to exist. For example, we know that radio and television signals are all around us,
but we cannot “see” them. Mental world is just like that.
§ In the four realms of the Arūpa Loka, “dense matter” formed by suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
are absent (except for the hadaya vatthu of the arūpa brahmas). Beings in the arūpa loka
experience only dhamma. They do not have any of the five physical senses and have only the
mind (hadaya vatthu).
Click to open in pdf format: WebLink: PDF File: Two Types of Loka
§ Thus the “material world” is accessible only to living beings in the kāma loka and rūpa loka.
§ Arūpa loka means there are no “condensed rūpa” (like those in kāma loka and rūpa loka), but
of course, dhamma are there (those arūpa beings can think and recall past events just like us).
§ Furthermore, even in the rūpa loka only fine and subtle matter exists. There are no “solid
objects” like trees. If we visit a rūpa loka, we may not see anything.
Rūpa and be Dense or Fine (Subtle)
2. Rūpa in Buddha Dhamma cannot be translated to English as “matter” or “solid objects.” Our minds
can make very fine rūpa. The mind can also detect fine (or subtle) rūpa that are in the mind plane or
the immaterial world.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, those very fine rūpa are called “dhammā” (of course the word “dhamma”
is used in other contexts too, like in Buddha Dhamma). They are called “anidassanan,
appatighan,” meaning they cannot be seen or detected by our five physical senses; see, “What
are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis“.
§ Those rūpa that the five physical senses detect are made of the smallest “unit of matter” in
Buddha Dhamma, called suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. (A suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is a
billion times smaller than an atom in present-day science). The 28 types of rūpa consist of these
“dense types of rūpa”; see, “Rūpa (Material Form)” and “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka
[Suddhaṭṭhaka].”
§ The fine rūpas are normally not called rūpa but are called dhammā to make the distinction.
Dhammā are very fine rūpa which are below the suddhāshtaka stage. They are the rūpa that
are grasped only by the mana indriya or dhammayatana: “anidassanan, appatighan,
dhammayatana pariyapanna rūpan.” For a more in-depth analysis, see, “What are Rūpa? –
Dhammā are Rūpa too!.”
3. Let us briefly discuss the main points depicted in the above chart. Everything in this world is made
of 6 dhātu: pathavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, akāsa, and viññāṇa. Five of them constitute the “material world”
and the viññāṇa dhātu represents the “immaterial world”.
§ By the way, akāsa is not merely “empty space”. We will discuss this later.
§ The basic building block for the material world is suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. Not long ago,
scientists thought that atoms were the building blocks, but now they say that even those
elementary particles have structure. A suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is much more finer than
any elementary particle.
§ In the immaterial world (or the mental plane), there are the mental precursors to suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka]. They are dhamma, gati, and bhava. Based on our gati, we make suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] in our javana citta; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka
[Suddhaṭṭhaka].”
Five Physical Senses Detect Dense Rūpa
4. We have five sense faculties to experience the material world: eyes, ears, tongue, nose, and the
body. They pass down the sense inputs to the five pasāda rūpa located in the gandhabba or the
monomaya kāya, that overlaps our physical body); see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya).” By the way,
gandhabba is not a Mahayāna concept: “Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka.”
§ On the mental side, we have a mana indriya in the brain to sense the immaterial world; see,
“Brain – Interface between Mind and Body.”
§ Based on those five physical sense contacts with the material world and the contacts of the
mana indriya with the immaterial world, our thoughts arise in the hadaya vatthu (also located
in the gandhabba or the monomaya kāya); see, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought
Moments?.”
§ That is a very brief description of the chart above. One could gain more information by clicking
on the links provided and by using the “Search” button. Don’t worry too much if all this does
not make complete sense yet.
5. Thus it is important to understand that there are two types of rūpa in our human world:
§ Tangible matter in the material world that we experience with the help of the five physical
senses.
§ Then there are unseen (anidassana), intangible (appatigha) rūpa such as thoughts, perceptions,
plans, memories. They are dhammā, mano rūpa, gati, bhava, nāma gotta. It is the mana indriya
in the brain that helps detect those subtle rūpa.
§ Both types of rūpa are eventually detected and experienced by the mind (hadaya vatthu). The
hadaya vatthu is not located in the brain but in the body of gandhabba and overlaps the
physical heart region of the physical body; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya).”
§ Comprehending this “wider picture” may need a little bit of effort. The world is complex and
most of the complexity is associated with the mind. The seat of the mind is not in the brain but
in the fine body (manomaya kāya) of the gandhabba.
6. Another part of our nāma loka or the immaterial world is the dream world.
§ When we dream, we “see” people and material objects. But we cannot say where those are
located. They do not have a physical location; they are in the mano loka or the immaterial
plane. And we do not “see” those dreams with our eyes, but with the mana indriya.
§ When we sleep, our five physical senses do not function. But the mana indriya in the brain
does. Scientists do confirm that our brains are active during sleep.
§ What is experienced in Arūpa Loka is somewhat similar to seeing dreams. Of course, one has
the ability to contemplate in the arūpa loka. However, one is unable to read or listen. Therefore,
one cannot learn Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta) from a Noble Person. Thus, one is unable
to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna in the arūpa loka. But if one had attained the
Sotāpanna stage prior to being born there, one is able to meditate and attain higher stages of
Nibbāna.
Dense Rūpa for “Rough” Sensory Contacts
7. There is another way to look at our sense experiences. Living beings are attached to this world
because they expect to gain pleasures from this world. Such pleasures are obtained by making contact
with rūpa. Those rūpa come at various densities.
§ Bodily pleasures are achieved by the strongest contacts (touch). Then come taste, smell, vision,
sounds, becoming less dense in that order.
§ The softest contact is via dhamma. This is our immaterial world; we think, plan for the future,
remember things from the past, etc: We do this all the time, and we can do it anywhere.
Another way to say this is to say that we engage in mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Thus, contacts by the mana indriya with dhamma in the mano loka constitute a significant
portion of sense experience. That involves mano rūpa (dhamma, gati, bhava, nāma gotta) in the
mind plane or the immaterial world.
8. The way a living being experiences and enjoys (or suffers) sense contacts is different in the three
main categories of existence: kāma loka, rūpa loka, and arūpa loka.
§ Most “rough” or “olārika” sense contacts are available only in the kāma loka. Even here, they
are roughest in the niraya (the lowest realm) and in general reduces in “roughness” as moving
up to the human realm, the fifth. The 6 deva realms are significantly “softer” than the human
realm; deva bodies are much more finer (like that of a gandhabba) and a normal human cannot
see them.
§ The roughest sense contacts (touch, taste, and smell) are absent in the rūpa loka. Only visual
and sound contacts are available for the brahmas in the 16 rūpa loka realms, in addition to the
mind.
§ Those arupi brahmas in the 4 arūpa loka realms have only the mind, with which they
experience only the finest rūpa (dhamma) that are below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
stage.
§ Those brahmas in both rūpi and arūpi loka have seen the perils of “kāma assāda” that are
available in the kāma loka. They had enjoyed jhānic pleasures as humans and value those more
than the “rough” sense pleasures. They have given up the craving for those “rough” sense
pleasures that are available via touch, taste, and smell.
9. We can get an idea of such “soft” and “rough” sense contacts with the following example. Suppose
someone (a grandmother is a good example) watching her grandchild laughing and dancing around
having a good time.
§ At first, she may be watching from a distance and enjoying the sight of the little baby having
fun.
§ Then she goes and hugs the child. It is not enough to just watch from a distance; she needs to
touch the child.
§ If the child keeps on wiggling and having a good time, the grandmother may start kissing the
child. In some cases, the grandmother may start tightening the hold on the child, even without
realizing it and may make the child cry out in pain.
§ This last scenario is an example of how the craving for extreme sense pleasures can instead lead
to suffering. Of course, it is the craving for olārika sense pleasures that leads to most
suffering.
§ But suffering is there even in the rūpi and arūpi realms. Even at the level of arūpi brahmas —
where the attachment is only to pleasures of the softest of the rūpa (dhamma) — there is
inevitable suffering at the end when they have to give up that existence and come back down to
the human realm.
Less Suffering in “Less-Dense” Realms
10. Therefore, the level of inevitable suffering goes hand in hand with the “denseness” of the sensory
contact.
§ Pains, aches, and illnesses are there only in the lowest 5 realms (including the human realm)
where there are dense physical bodies. In the higher realms those are absent. This is the price
even the humans pay for being able to experience “rough contact pleasures” such as a body
massage, sex, eating, and smelling.
§ We humans in the kāma loka like to enjoy close and “rough” sense pleasures. In addition, most
times, just enjoying sense pleasures is not enough; we like to “own” those things that provide
sense pleasures. For example, people like to “own” vacation homes; it is not enough to rent a
house in that location just for the visit.
§ This tendency to “own” pleasurable things also go down in higher realms. There are fewer
material things to “own” in brahma lokas, especially in the arūpi brahma realms.
11. As one attains higher stages of Nibbāna, craving for “rough” sense pleasures, as well as the desire
to “own” things go down.
§ A Sotāpanna has only “seen” the perils of kāma assāda; he/she still enjoys them.
§ A Sakadāgāmī may still enjoy “kāma assāda“, but has no desire to “own” those things that
provide pleasures. It is enough to live in a nice rented house, and there is no desire to own a
nice house. In fact, a Sakadāgāmī can clearly see the burden of “owning things”.
§ An Anāgāmī has no special interest in enjoying kāma assāda. He/she eats to quench the hunger
(but will eat delicious foods when offered), and will never give priority to any sense pleasure
over the “pleasure of Dhamma” (of course, Dhamma here means Buddha Dhamma). He/she
also likes jhānic pleasures and thus will be born in the rūpa realms reserved for the Anāgāmīs
upon death.
§ An Arahant has no desire for even jhānic pleasures and will not be born anywhere in the 31
realms upon death.
Each habitable planetary system (cakkavāla) has all 31 realms of existence, even though we can only
see two realms (human and animal) in ours.
This is discussed next: “31 Realms Associated with the Earth”, ………
2.5.3 31 Realms Associated with the Earth
May 20, 2016; revised November 29, 2018; April 25, 2019; August 27, 2019
1. There are many things in “this world” that we cannot see, hear, etc. (i.e., perceive with our six
senses). Scientists admit that they cannot account for 96% of the “stuff” that makes our universe. See,
“The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality”,
by Richard Panek (2011). For more information, Google “dark energy, dark matter.”
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
28 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Many forms of energy that apparently do not have significant mass (or weight) but exist out
there in the world.
§ A good example is the fact that we are unaware of the huge amounts of “information” that
surrounds us. There are hundreds and thousands of radio and television signals in a major city.
We cannot see or hear any of those programs (i.e., we are unaware of their existence) without
having a radio or a television “tuned” to the correct frequency.
§ In the same way, we are unaware of the existence of 29 of the 31 realms centered around the
Earth. Living beings in some of those realms live side-by-side by us, but we are unaware of
them. Most of these beings have bodies “more like energy forms” than solid bodies.
§ With better detection technologies, we may be able to communicate with some of these living
beings with subtle bodies in the future. Of course, those who develop abhiññā powers can also
see some of them. We will get back to this issue below, but let us first discuss the relative
locations of the 31 realms.
2. Buddha Dhamma says there are 31 realms associated with each habitable planetary system
(cakkavāla). And there are an infinite number of them in the universe (this latter fact has been
confirmed by science).
§ Modern science is gradually confirming this broader world view explained by the Buddha 2500
years ago; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction.” Only a few hundred years ago, Western
world accepted a universe that centered around the Earth with stars “embedded in a celestial
sphere”; see, “WebLink: WIKI: Celestial spheres.”
3. In the post, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma,” we described a model that consisted of 31
concentric “shells”. The actuality is pretty much close to that analogy, with some additional features.
I have compiled a summary of the 31 realms in the table “31 Realms of Existence.”
§ The sphere with 31 concentric shells overlaps the Earth. The lowest realm, niraya (or hell) is
located deep inside the Earth.
§ The next four realms (preta, asura, animal, and human) are closer to the Earth’s surface. There
are some preta apāyas deep inside the Earth, but some pretās live on the surface. Asurās also
live on the surface, but mostly in remote locations such as the ocean and isolated mountains.
Both cannot see both pretās and asurās.
§ There are many suttas in the Tipiṭaka that describe those three realms (niraya, preta, asura) in
detail. We will discuss it in the future. The Peta Vatthu in the Khuddaka Nikāya of the Tipiṭaka
describes pretās as well as gandhabbās.
4. Of course, humans and animals live on the surface of the Earth. Gandhabbās only belong to the
human and animal realms. They belong to either the human or animal bhava. Those gandhabbās are
waiting for a suitable womb to be born with human (or animal) bodies; see the section: Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya).
§ Thus we say that those gandhabbās are in para loka (nether world). Even though they live
alongside us, we cannot see their very subtle bodies: “Hidden World of the Gandhabba:
Netherworld (Para Loka).”
§ So, our world is much more complicated than we think.
5. Then come the six realms for the devas. The lowest of the six deva realms are again located on the
surface of the Earth. Those devas are called Bhummatta devas, and they belong to the
Cātummahārājika deva realm; see, “31 Realms of Existence.” They live mostly in their residences
(deva vimāna) based on trees. Of course, we cannot see them or their “residences.”
§ The higher deva realms extend out from the Earth.
§ The 16 rūpa realms extend even higher above the Earth.
§ The four arūpa loka realms are located even further from the Earth.
§ All these realms are concentric with Earth’s center. As the Earth spins around its axis and
rotates around the Sun, all 31 domains move along with the Earth, just like the human realm
does.
§ Buddha has named these various realms in several key suttas, for example, in WebLink:
suttacentral: Dhammacappavattana Sutta (SN 56.11) and WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā Samaya
Sutta (DN 20).
6. In general, beings in higher realms can “see” those in the lower ones, but not the other way around
(if come “face-to-face”). For example, devas can see us, but cannot see the rūpi or arūpi brahmās.
Rūpi brahmās can see devas, but cannot see the arūpi brahmās.
§ From the previous post, “Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial,” we know that there are
only traces of “real” matter (suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]) in the arūpa realms. Thus beings in
the other 27 realms cannot “see” those arūpi brahmās.
§ When one develops abhiññā powers, one is said to be able “see” successively higher realms. Of
course, one needs to be able to get into the fourth jhāna to develop such abhiññā powers.
Eventually, when one develops the eighth jhāna (and can get into attha samapatti), one could
be able to see many of the 31 realms.
7. Now let us look at “things” in this world from a different perspective. A fundamental premise of
Buddha Dhamma is the following. “Energy” is embedded in spin (bramana in Pāli; bramana or
බ්රමණ in Sinhala), and in rotation (paribbramana in Pāli; paribbramana or පරිබ්රමණ in Sinhala).
§ The smallest unit of matter, a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], does not stay still. Depending on
its rotation or spin (bramana) and its rotation around something else (paribbramana), other
“modes of energy” and “types of rūpa” arise.
§ It is easy to visualize by considering the motions of the Earth. We all know that the Earth
rotates (paribbhramana) around the Sun, and it takes a year to complete one revolution around
the Sun.
§ While doing that the Earth rotates around its North-South axis; this is the spinning (bramana).
It takes a day for the Earth to complete one such spin.
§ Here is an excellent video that discusses this universal feature:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Rotation in Space - Professor Carolin Crawford
8. There are an infinite number of such cakkavāla (star systems or a collection of planets revolving
around a star) in our universe. Each planet in such a “star system” undergoes spin around its own axis
and rotation around the star. Science has confirmed this within the past hundred years.
§ Each of those cakkavāla may have “Earth-like” planets with their own 31 realms.
§ A cluster of thousand such cakkavāla is called a “cūḷanikā lokadhātu” or a “small world
system.” Thousand of such systems is a “majjhimikā lokadhātu” or a “medium world system.”
A cluster of thousand of such systems is a “mahāsahassī lokadhātu” or a “large world system”;
see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Cūḷanikā Sutta (AN 3.80).”
§ Also see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamakosala Sutta (AN 10.29)” and “Buddhism and
Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27).”
9. Scientists have also confirmed that all elementary particles (the smallest particles scientists can
detect) have spin. Furthermore, in an atom, the electrons can be said to “rotate” around the nucleus, in
a crude analogy with the Earth rotating around the Sun.
§ Then our Solar system rotates too. The next higher conglomerates (for example, galaxies) also
undergo rotation. Because of these rotations, all these structures tend to flatten out. For
instance, in our Solar system, all the planets are on a plane. In the same way, all galaxies in a
galaxy cluster in a flattened disk.
§ Therefore, even though we see a very calm starry night sky, things out there are in constant
motion. Furthermore, there are violent explosions of stars (supernova) that occur a billion times
a year in the visible universe.
§ That is why the realities out there are much more different than what we perceive with our very
crude sense faculties. All the atoms and molecules in our bodies are in constant motion, not to
mention the spins and rotations of uncountable suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] that constitute
them.
§ Thus everything around us is in constant flux. Our senses are just not capable of detecting them.
10. Modern science has also enabled us to see more and more of living beings around us. For
example, the Western world was not aware of the existence of microscopic living beings until the
advent of the microscope by Leeuwenhoek in the late 17th century: WebLink: WIKI: Antonie van
Leeuwenhoek.
§ Now we know that there are billions of living beings in the body of a human being. See, “There
are as many creatures on your body as there are people on Earth!.”
§ Hopefully, new technologies will enable us to “see” many living beings belonging to the preta,
asura, and deva realms — as well as gandhabbas — in the future.
§ Even though there are some claims of detection of horrible sounds from the niraya deep inside
the Earth, they have not been confirmed; see, “Does the Hell (Niraya) Exist?.”
11. As one moves up to higher realms, attachments to the material aspects decreases. That is why
living beings in higher realms have less number of sense faculties.
§ In the kāma loka, one has all six sense faculties. Even there, the higher deva realms have “less
strong sense contacts” with less dense bodies that we cannot see.
§ Rūpi brahmas have much more delicate “bodies” compared to kāma loka devas. They do not
have touch, taste, and smell sensations.
§ “Matter” is very subtle in higher rūpa loka and arūpa loka realms. Therefore, even in the final
destruction of a cakkavāla (in a supernova explosion), the realms above the Abhassara realm
(realm #17) are not destroyed. That is why the lifetimes of those brahmas are much longer than
a single mahā kappa (an eon or the age of the universe); see, “31 Realms of Existence.”
12. Now we can understand why we cannot see the other 29 realms.
§ In the higher realms around the Earth, living beings (and their environments) have very little
solid matter. That is why we cannot see them or their habitats.
§ The four arūpa realms are mostly devoid of even the smallest unit of matter (suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka]). Realms in the rūpa loka and even in the deva realms of the kāma loka are
made of very fine matter that we cannot see.
§ The beings in the niraya (hell) have very dense bodies subjected to various forms of torture; of
course, that realm is located deep inside the Earth.
13. We are used to the perception of “solid tangible physical bodies” of humans and animals. That is
called the “ghana saññā.” However, those physical bodies are mostly “empty.” That is because
atoms, which are the basic building blocks, are mostly empty.
§ Furthermore, our physical bodies all start with a single cell (zygote) in a mother’s womb. One
needs a microscope to see a single cell. A gandhabba (which is even smaller than a cell)
merges with that zygote that was formed by the union of a mother and a father. See, “Buddhist
Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception.”
§ Before entering the womb, that gandhabba had a fine body similar to that of a rupi brahma.
Then that cell grows by taking in food first from the mother and then by eating once coming out
of the womb. Our heavy physical bodies result from the accumulation of inert matter (by eating
food).
§ And as we discussed in “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births,” a human bhava may
not end at the physical death of the solid body that lives about 100 years. A human bhava may
last thousands of years, and that life-stream continues its existence in many “physical bodies”
with the gandhabba as the basis.
14. For example, in rebirth stories, the physical bodies in successive births are different, even though
there may be some similarities; see, “Evidence for Rebirth.” In between consecutive lives, the life-
stream continues just in the form its core, the gandhabba.
§ The solid body of a few hundred pounds that we consider to be “me,” is just a shell. When the
gandhabba leaves the body — either at death or sometimes during a heart operation (see,
“Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)”), it has no attributes of life.
§ That is an excellent way to contemplate the “ghana saññā” or to realize that our physical
bodies are mostly dead matter; a shell that the gandhabba resides in. If a person of 300 pounds
loses 100 pounds of weight, really that person “loses” one-third of his/her identity? It is the
same person because the gandhabba is the same.
§ All beings in the 31 realms eventually have “mental bodies” that are very fine comparable to
that of a gandhabba. Even with our most excellent microscopes, we cannot see their ultra-fine
“bodies.”
15. Finally, this overall picture gives us a perspective on how foolish we are to focus on material
wealth, titles, etc. for at most 100 years in this life. By living a moral life, and by doing meritorious
deeds we can make a much bigger “investment” on the future. That is by accruing merits that could
lead to rebirths in deva or brahma deva worlds where there is much less suffering and no physical
illnesses.
§ But even in those higher realms, death is inevitable no matter how long the lifetimes are. Most
of all, there is no escape from the possibility of future births in the lowest four realms. Thus
Nibbāna is the only permanent solution.
Next in the series, “Gandhabba – Only in Human and Animal Realms”, ….
2.5.4 Gandhabba – Only in Human and Animal Realms
2. We will first review two significant aspects of the 31 realms. Then we will discuss the concept of a
gandhabba (which applies only to human and animal realms) in more detail.
§ First is that the transition from one existence (bhava) to another is ALWAYS instantaneous; it
happens at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment (“cuti” pronounced “chuthi”); see, “Paṭisandhi Citta –
How the Next Life is Determined According to Gathi” and “Cuti-Paṭisandhi – An Abhidhamma
Description.”
§ The second aspect is that in the 20 higher-lying realms, those beings (Brahmas) weigh less than
a billionth of an atom in modern science!
§ All beings with dense bodies are in the 11 realms of the kāma loka. Even there, the six deva
realms have less-dense bodies compared to humans.
Death of Physical Body Different From the End of an Existence
3. The following chart shows the major features of what happens at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment. That
is when a living being makes a transition from one bhava (existence) to another, say from being a
human to a Brahma.
Click to open the pdf file: WebLink: PDF File: Births in Different Realms
§ Without exception, at each such cuti-paṭisandhi moment, a new kammaja kāya is generated by
the kammic energy fueling a new existence. That kammaja kāya ALWAYS has a hadaya
vatthu. That is the seat of the mind (the quality of which depends on the realm).
Types of “Bodies” In Different Realms
4. Thus it is essential to realize that the critical thing that happens at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment is
the generation of the unbelievably small kammaja kāya, which contains the blueprint for the new
existence. At that point, the mechanism of “birth” can be roughly divided into three categories, as
shown in the chart.
§ The Brahmas in the rūpi and arūpi realms (top 20 realms) are instantaneously born with very
little else other than several suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]-size “material elements.” Their body
features discussed below. The main feature here is that they are spontaneously born in those
realms and live very long times there until death. Then another cuti-paṭisandhi moment takes
that being to a new bhava.
§ The only difference in the six deva realms (in kāma loka) compared to the Brahmas is that they
do have well-defined physical bodies (karaja kāya) like us. However, those bodies are much
less dense, and we are not able to see them even if they stand right in front of us.
§ A deva is born with the body equivalent of a 16-year-old, and their food is a drink called
amurtha. Devas have all five sense faculties like us and are said to the optimum sense pleasures
available in kāma loka. They also live that one life until death and then switch to a new
existence (bhava) at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ That completes the discussion on the green box to the right.
5. What happens in the green box to the left is a bit more complicated. That is because each realm in
the apayas (lowest four realms) is somewhat different. We will discuss the animal realm together
with the human realm (middlebox) below. Let us first discuss briefly the lowest three realms
indicated by the green box on the left.
§ The lowest is the niraya (hell), where beings are born with full dense bodies like ours
instantaneously. They undergo ceaseless cutting, burning, and various other forms of torture.
They die innumerable times, only to be reborn promptly. Only when the kammic energy for that
existence is exhausted (usually after millions of years) that they encounter the next cuti-
paṭisandhi moment.
§ Beings in the preta (peta) realm also are born instantaneously and can have subtle or dense
bodies. The distinguishing feature there is suffering due to hunger.
§ Beings in the asura realm are beings with massive, very inactive bodies. They are also born
instantaneously and live those miserable lives until the next cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
Kammaja Kāya (Gandhabba) Can Last Thousands of Years With Many
Human Rebirths
6. That brings us to the middle green box, which represents the human and animal realms. A little bit
more complicated process takes place here. Here also, a being with a subtle (energy) body is
produced at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment, just like in the rūpa loka realms. It is called a gandhabba.
§ A gandhabbas has the basic thrija kāya of a rūpi Brahma: kammaja kāya, cittaja kāya, and
utuja kāya, which we will discuss in detail below. Besides, a gandhabba may acquire a very
fine karaja kāya (physical body) by inhaling the aroma. Thus a gandhabba is denser than a rūpi
Brahma. It has a “body” more like that of a deva in density.
§ A gandhabba could be in that state for many years until a suitable womb becomes available. A
suitable womb (more precisely the mental state of the mother at that time) must match the gati
of the gandhabba. The evolution of the gandhabba in the womb is discussed in, “What does
Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?.” Then it is born as a new baby, grows,
and eventually, that physical body also dies. If there is more kammic energy left for the bhava,
then the gandhabba leaves that dead body and waits for another womb. That process continues
until the bhava energy is exhausted, and then it goes through the cuti-paṭisandhi moment to
receive a new bhava; see the chart above.
§ In addition to going into a womb, (in some animal species), gandhabba enters an egg inside a
female animal. Upon growing to a full animal and death, gandhabba comes out and waits for
another egg. It is the same procedure as above.
Physical Body is Just a Temporary Shelter
7. One of the main benefits of learning about the gandhabba is in helping remove the wrong view
that “I am my physical body.”
§ In the contrary, a physical body is a temporary shelter that the gandhabba uses to experience
the much-coveted “sense pleasures.” In particular, smelling, eating, and touch (most of all, sex)
require a dense human body. Unfortunately, a human body can last only about 100 years. Even
that body is in the “decay mode” after 50 years or so. Thus, those sense pleasures start
diminishing, and eventually, that body dies.
§ Then the gandhabba comes out of that dead body and waits for a suitable womb. If and when it
gets into a womb, the new physical body is influenced by the new parents. Thus the new body
can be very different from that in the previous birth. Even during this same “human bhava,” our
human bodies may look very different from one birth to another (as confirmed by rebirth
stories).
§ Of course, the gandhabba does not stay the same either. The only things that can be called
“personal” to that gandhabba are its gati, and those evolve too.
§ That is a brief explanation of the above chart.
Brahma “Bodies” Have Only a Trace of Matter
8. As we mentioned in #4 above, most lifeforms in the 31 realms have unbelievably tiny physical
bodies. They are more like “energy bodies.” Any individual being in the 16 rūpa loka realms and
the four arūpa loka realms weighs less than a billionth of an atom! They may be thought more as
energy packets.
§ In case it was not clear from previous posts, we recall that an arūpa loka Brahma has a
kammaja kāya consisting of just a vatthu dasaka.
§ Rupa loka Brahmas have vatthu dasaka (seat of the mind) and two pasada rūpa for seeing and
hearing. They also have kāya dasaka and bhava dasaka. Thus their kammaja kāya has five
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]-size elements. A rūpa loka Brahma also has a cittaja kāya
(thought stream) and a utuja kāya (very fine).
§ Thus any of these Brahmas cannot be seen with the most sophisticated microscope we have
today.
§ More details in, “Body Types in 31 Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kaya.” A manomaya
kāya, when referred to the human and animal realms, is the same as gandhabba.
Kammaja Kāya of a Human Gandhabba
9. Let us again summarize the make up of a kammaja kāya of a human gandhabba. It has a hadaya
vatthu (consisting of a vatthu dasaka), bhava dasaka, and kāya dasaka, and four pasada rūpa
(cakkhu dasaka, sota dasaka, gandha dasaka, jivaha dasaka).
§ This kammaja kāya consists of 7 suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] in different bramana (spin) and
paribramana (rotation) modes. That is how they become dasaka (units of ten or decads); see,
“31 Realms Associated with the Earth“.
§ Six of these define the sense faculties of the gandhabba: vatthu dasaka is the mind, and kāya,
cakkhu, sota, gandha, and jivha dasaka) are the “fine senses” that correspond to body, eyes,
ears, nose, and tongue in the physical body. Gandhabba can interact with the external world
directly via them when outside the physical body. It can smell and inhale aroma giving rise to a
very fine and subtle material body. However, that body is not solid enough to physically touch
anything or to eat.
§ The seventh dasaka is bhava dasaka, which — together with the kāya dasaka — defines what
kind of a physical body it will start building once inside a womb. For example, bhava dasaka
determines sex.
10. As soon as the kammaja kāya forms at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment, the mind becomes active. The
thought stream (cittaja kāya) starts, and the mind will be mostly in the bhavaṅga state.
Simultaneously, an utuja kāya forms by the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] generated by both the
kammaja kāya and cittaja kāya.
§ Thus immediately after the cuti-paṭisandhi moment, gandhabba has three “bodies” or thrija
kāya. However, the cittaja kāya is all mental, and both the kammaja kāya and utuja kāya are
very fine. They are more like “energy bodies.”
§ Soon after this “initial formation,” the gandhabba can build a “subtle, misty” body (karaja
kāya) by inhaling aroma (from fruits, trees, etc.). Still, an average human cannot see it, since it
is not “dense enough.” However, some people (especially those with abhiññā powers) can see
“sufficiently solidified” gandhabbas.
The desire for a Dense Human Body
11. But this gandhabba is continuously under stress because it is unable to enjoy the most coveted
sense pleasures of those with dense human bodies, i.e., eating and sex. It can see people enjoying
these sense pleasures and is very much frustrated not being able to acquire a “real physical body.”
Some can stay in this state for many, many years if a suitable womb does not become available.
§ In some cases, they may spend the kammic energy for the human bhava and undergo another
cuti-paṭisandhi moment without inheriting a human body. That is why one is indebted to one’s
parents, no matter how bad they may be.
12. The story of the gandhabba gets more interesting (and complicated) after it goes through the first
birth as an average human and dying. The gandhabba that comes out of that dead body is, of course,
different from the original gandhabba. Its kammaja kāya has changed due to whatever abhisaṅkhāra
that the human cultivated. But the kammic energy for the human bhava does not change; if it had
1000 years worth of kammic energy at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment, that would deplete with time.
§ Of course, there is no cuti-paṭisandhi moment when a human dies with extra kammic energy for
the human bhava. Death is the death of the physical body. The gandhabba comes out of that
dead body awaits a new womb; see the above chart. Thus all three components of the thrija
kāya continue after the “death of the human.”
New Physical Body Incorporates Characteristics of New Parents Too
13. Let us consider some important features of this gandhabba that comes out of that dead body after
its birth as a human.
§ The kammaja kāya still has a copy of the previous physical body. However, when it starts a
new physical body in the new womb, it takes some features from the new parents too. Thus the
new physical body is a trade-off between those three influences. It may keep some
distinguishing features (birthmarks or gunshot wounds, for example, as we have encountered in
rebirth accounts. But it will acquire new features also from the new parents (skin color, size,
etc.).
§ The gandhabba that comes of the dead body is just a “misty, fine version” of the person at
death. Most times, they come out with imprints of the clothes they were wearing at death and
may look just like that (in a ghostly, misty form) until going into a new womb. My teacher
Thero has seen gandhabbas of people who died hundreds of years ago “wearing” those old
costumes. Of course, they are not real physical clothes.
14. Since the cittaja kāya also continues, their thought streams continue. So, if someone dies in an
accident, he may not realize that he is dead for a little while. If he died from a gunshot instantly, the
gandhabba comes out of and will be looking at the dead body trying to figure out what happened. He
may wish to go home and finds himself instantly at home. And he will try to shout to others, but of
course, they don’t hear. He may try to touch them, but he cannot. It takes seven days for a gandhabba
to comprehend what happened entirely and to resign to his/her new life.
§ That is also why children can recall their past life. But just like we start forgetting things from
years ago, those children start forgetting about the previous life when they grow older.
Furthermore, it is harder to remember from past life compared to this life.
§ Another point is that most such rebirth accounts are from people who died while young in
accidents. Those gandhabbas who come out of the bodies of people dying at old age are not
likely to remember that life. That is because even during that life, they might have lost their
memories.
Next in the series, “Body Types in 31 Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kaya”, ………..
2.5.5 Body Types in 31 Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kāya
Published before October 23, 2015; revised May 31, 2016; major revision Dec. 1, 2018
1. There are three main categories that the 31 realms can be divided into: kāma loka, rūpa loka, and
arūpa loka.
§ Living beings in the kāma loka are in 11 realms: four lowest realms (apāyās), human realm and
six devā realms.
§ Rūpa loka has 16 rūpāvacara brahma realms. A “rūpāvacara brahma” means a brahma in the
rūpa loka.
§ Arūpa loka has 4 arūpāvacara brahma realms.
2. Different sets of sense faculties are associated with beings in those three types of “loka”.
§ Those in the arūpa loka have just the mind. Therefore, the only rūpa (or matter) associated
with an arūpi brahma is the hadaya vatthu, which is of the size of the smallest unit of matter in
Buddha Dhamma called a suddhāshtaka.
§ That suddhāshtaka is much smaller than an atom in modern science. So, we cannot see these
beings. It is important to note that cannot even see many microscopic beings that live among us,
like those in drinking water. Just because we cannot see them, it does mean they do not exist.
3. Those in the rūpa loka have just sense faculties: eyes, ears, and the mind.
§ But the eyes and ears are not solid and tangible things like the physical eyes and ears that we or
the animals have.
§ Seeing and hearing for those rūpāvacara brahmas happen with the aid of cakkhu and sota
pasāda rūpa. Each of those two are also of the size of a suddhāshtaka.
§ Therefore, even for a rūpāvacara brahma, the whole “body” is made of basically three
suddhāshtaka, unimaginably small. This collection of hadaya vatthu and the two pasāda rūpa
is called the manomaya kaya of that brahma.
§ An arūpāvacara brahma has a manomaya kaya that has only a hadaya vatthu.
§ Therefore, even with the aid of the most sophisticated microscope it will be impossible see any
of brahmas in those 20 realms.
4. In fact ALL BEINGS have the basic sense faculties of the size of a suddhāshtaka each. The basic
sensing unit for a kāmāvacara being has six units for seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, touch,
and thinking.
§ Any kāmāvacara being (including humans, animals, and devās) has a “fine body” with those
unseen five sense faculties called “pasāda rūpa”: cakkhu pasāda rūpa for seeing, sota pasāda
rūpa for hearing, ghāṇa pasāda rūpa for tasting, jivhā pasāda rūpa for smelling, kāya pasāda
rūpa for touching.
§ These five sets of pasāda rūpa and the hadaya vatthu make up the “mental body” or
“manomaya kāya” of a kāmāvacara living being.
§ It is easy to see that a rūpāvacara brahma has a manomaya kāya with just two pasāda rūpa (for
seeing and hearing) and a hadaya vatthu for thinking. An arūpāvacara brahma has just the
hadaya vatthu for the mind.
5. The physical (solid) eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body of a kāmāvacara being (human or
animal) just act as “sensing equipment” to collect external signals.
§ Then the brain processes those signals and send to the manomaya kāya that is inside this solid
body. I will explain this in the next post.
§ This is why even for humans, the essence is in the manomaya kāya. The solid body is just an
inert shell that is “powered by” the manomaya kāya. When the manomaya kāya comes out at
death, the physical body becomes inert just like a log of wood.
6. This “manomaya kāya” is the one that takes hold of the zygote in a womb at conception. That
zygote is made by the union of the mother and father; see, “Buddhist Explanations of Conception,
Abortion, and Contraception“.
§ A gandhabba that descends to the womb originally has a bit more denser body than this
manomaya kāya. In addition to the “manomaya kāya”, it has a “material body” too, but that is
still too fine to be seen by us. When the gandhabba enters the womb, that “material body” is
shed and only the “very fine manomaya kāya” combines with the zygote.
§ As discussed in that post, that zygote is the cell formed by the union of the mother and father
and is well understood in modern science. Of course the modern science is not aware of the
manomaya kāya of the gandhabba that merges with the zygote.
§ In fact, scientists do not know how that zygote becomes a “new life”, a brand new living
being.
10. The physical bodies (utuja kaya) of those rūpi brahmas are much finer compared to those of the
devas, and thus devas cannot see those rūpi brahmas just like we cannot see the devas.
§ The brahmas (and also devas) can “see” without the aid of light and “hear” without the having
air to transmit sound waves; their “physical bodies” do not have “eyes” and “ears” like ours.
Thus they can “see” and “hear” over great distances. And they can be anywhere they wish
within a short time.
§ The closest analogy of how their “vision” works is how we “see” dreams; we don’t need eyes to
see dreams. The brahmas just “see” (perceive may be a better word). These things will become
clear in the future, as we get into details.
11. A basic rule of thumb is that beings in lower realms, in general, cannot see the beings in the
higher realms; humans of course have the capability to develop abhinna powers and “see” those
beings in higher realms.
§ In the kamaloka, the highest realms are of course the deva realms. Devas are also born
instantaneously (opapātika births) just like the two kinds of brahmas. However, devas have a
fourth types of a body called the “karaja kaya“, which is like of our physical body. And just
like us they need to consume food (“amurtha“) regularly to sustain their “karaja kaya” which is
also called the “aharaja kaya” since it requires food (“ahara“) for sustenance.
§ Thus devas have “four bodies” or “chatuja kaya“, i.e., the four bodies of “kammaja kaya“,
cittaja kaya, utuja kaya, and the “karaja kaya”.are collectively called a “chatuja kaya“.
§ But devas (and brahmas) do not get sick. They just die and disappear when the kammic energy
for that existence runs out.
12. When humans and animals are first “born” into that existence, they are also instantly formed in a
form close to that of a brahma. This is the manomaya kāya generated by kammic energy at the cuti-
paṭisandhi moment.
§ That manomaya kāya is condensed into the gandhabba state that we have talked about in
previous essays; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya) – Introduction” and follow-up posts.
§ For example, if a man dies and if he still has kammic energy for the “human bhava” left, then
he will be reborn as human; otherwise, he will latch onto another “bhava” depending on his
past strong kamma vipāka. For example, his next “bhava“could be as a deer.
§ If he is reborn a human, a “human gandhabba” will emerge form the dead body; if he is to be
born a deer, then a “deer gandhabba” will emerge from the dead body.
13. The body of a human or animal gandhabba is also a “chatuja kaya” like that of a deva; but it is
finer than the body of a deva. A gandhabba can only inhale odours (“gandha” + “abba“) as food, and
thus the name.
§ Just like brahmas or devas, a gandhabba can “see” and “hear” over great distances. A
gandhabba does not have a solid body to support physical eyes or ears. (Of course we have
hard time imagining that. But it can be compared to what happens when we see a dream. There
is no need for light to see dreams; we see dreams when it is pitch black at night; we do not
“see” dreams with our eyes).
§ Even though one could think that it would be nice to be a gandhabba, a human gandhabba is in
perpetual stress (agony may be a better word). A gandhabba cannot enjoy any kind of “contact”
sense pleasure since the body is so fine; cannot taste food, or grasp anything. Most of all, a
gandhabba suffers mentally because he/she can “see” normal humans “enjoying life”
eating tasty foods, enjoying sex, etc.
14. Of course, brahmas and devas can also “see” humans engaging in those activities (if they want
to), but they do not have any liking (upādāna) for such “coarse pleasures”. Their mental state is much
higher, just like a human who has developed abhiñña powers. They are actually said to be repulsed
by human bodies. Just like we do not “miss out” on the activities of worms, they are not interested in
human activities. It all depends on the mindset associated with the particular bhava.
§ But a gandhabba has received the human or animal “bhava” because he/she very much
DESIRES “coarse sense pleasures”: “upādāna paccayā bhava“.
15. Thus we can see that we get these solid, dense bodies BECAUSE that is what we so eagerly
desired. As long as we have craving for these “coarse sense pleasures” we will be born in the
kamaloka. Even though the devas are also in the kamaloka, their desires are not as “coarse”. They do
not need to “tightly grab things” to get the enjoyment.
§ Brahmas in rūpa loka are even further removed from “coarse sense pleasures”; they do not
have a desire for tastes, smells, or body touches. Seeing and hearing is enough for them.
§ Brahmas in arūpa loka do not even have a desire for sights and sounds. Mind pleasures are
enough for them, and the presence of matter is minimal in the arūpa loka.
16. What we do not realize is that having “dense body” also leads to various ailments, and also
subject to decay as it gets old.
§ Furthermore, now the ability to “see” and “hear” over great distances is gone. Now the
gandhabba is trapped inside a heavy, solid, body shell and has to “see” and “hear” through the
“physical doors” that are attached to that body. That is the sacrifice made to be able to have the
“grabbing experience”, to be able to enjoy coarse foods and sexual pleasures, etc.
§ The Buddha called the physical body (“karaja kaya” or “aharaja kaya“) a “cave” or a “shell”
that a gandhabba uses temporarily. It has a certain lifetime and during that time it grows,
decays, and finally dies. Then the gandhabba needs to find another body. Especially in the
kama loka, we just build a “new shell” when the old one dies, but also spend a lot of time as a
frustrated gandhabba waiting for a suitable womb to start building a new body.
17. Thus it should be clear now that it is only the “physical body” that decays and finally dies; a
human gandhabba will keep evolving and will find a “new body” similar to the old one IF the
kammic energy for that bhava is not exhausted. Otherwise, the human gandhabba will just disappear
(like a deva or brahma does at death), and a new animal gandhabba will emerge if the new bhava is
that of an animal; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ Thus we can see now that even for the humans and animals, “the basis” is a fine body of a
gandhabba that has a fine body like a rūpi brahma (and less dense than the body of a deva).
The “solid body” starts growing inside the mother’s womb and continues after the “birth” as a
baby by eating food.
18. The nature uses this physical body or the “shell” to impart kamma vipāka as well. We need to
constantly clean this body all the time, and also need to take care of vital body parts. These are part of
the “physical suffering” that we do not think twice about.
§ And of course, we can come down with not only minor colds and headaches, but also major
ailments like heart problems or cancer; this is also part of the “physical suffering”. Both kinds
of “physical suffering” arise due to the physical body.
§ However, these hardships are “masked” by our sense of “anticipated future happiness” by
acquiring such and such “pleasurable things”.
19. When some of those “hopes and dreams” do not materialize, we get severely distraught. Most of
the suicides are committed under such circumstances, and this “mental suffering” could be worse
than the “physical suffering” discussed above. It helps to read about WHY even famous, rich people
commit suicide; that is also a form of meditation. We need to understand how suffering arises, in
order to feel the full impact and be motivated to stop FUTURE suffering from arising.
§ However, the main goal of this essay is to point out the true nature of the physical body. Even
though we are enamored (especially at young age) about the appearance of our bodies, as we
get old we can see and experience the suffering that we endure because of this temporary
“shell” that we value so much. It is there only for about 100 years, and then we will move onto
another one; this is what we have been doing for countless eons.
20. The other point, which is even more important, is the special nature of the human body that has a
well-developed brain; see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“. That is what makes a human
life special, because that is what allows us to understand the message of the Buddha and be able to
get release from the suffering-filled round of rebirth.
§ How the bodies of the hell beings are prepared by kammic energy to just impart kamma vipāka
(they are unable to do abhisaṅkhāra, especially puññābhisaṅkhāra) Iis discussed in “Does the
Hell (Niraya) Exist?.
Next in the series: Gandhabba Sensing the World – With and Without a Physical Body
2.5.6 Gandhabba Sensing the World – With and Without a Physical Body
1. Physical bodies are just temporary shelters for the gandhabba. In a single “human bhava” or the
“existence as a human”, gandhabba could be using one to hundreds of different physical bodies; see,
“Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein” and “Gandhabba – Only in Human and
Animal Realms“. In between two consecutive “physical lives”, the gandhabba is in the nether world
or “paralowa“; see, “Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
§ Thus all racial and cultural divisions that people fight daily are meaningless; those identities
change as the gandhabba “switches physical bodies” from life to life. In principle, a Chinese
may be born as a “black person” in Africa or as a “white person” in Europe in the next life.
However, adjacent lives are normally in similar geographic locations, because of the condition
for matching “gathi“. Still, in the next “human bhava” — which may come after billions of
years — one’s gathi would have changed drastically.
§ As more and more people start grasping the Buddha Dhamma, most of the violence in the world
could reduce. Along that line, one who may be born to poverty in this life may be born a
wealthy person in the very next life (if enough merits accrued), and vice versa. All these
struggles we go through are only for an insignificantly short time in the scale of saṃsāra (cycle
of rebirths) or even compared to the duration of a single human bhava (which could last many
hundreds of years). Thus it is wise to “invest in the long term”.
2. When inside a physical body, the gandhabba‘s sensory system is shielded, and that is where our
physical sense faculties (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mana indriya in the brain) are used as
intermediaries; see below.
§ When outside a physical body (and waiting for a suitable womb), the gandhabba cannot eat or
physically touch tangible things, because it does not have a dense body. But it can see, hear and
smell (very fine odors). Furthermore, it uses a very sophisticated sensory system (not light or
sound waves) to see and hear, which we will also discuss briefly below.
3. The Buddha analyzed the world in many different ways. Here we discuss another such analysis,
since it can provide different insights about the gandhabba.
§ We have six sense faculties (indriya or āyatana) in order to sense six different types of “matter”
(rūpa) in our world. There is a subtle connection between our six sense faculties and the types
of “matter” in our world. We will discuss this connection.
§ By the way, indriya and āyatana have totally different meanings. For example, eyes are indriya
when we just happen to see things, but they BECOME āyatana when they are used for
pleasure, i.e., to deliberately look at sensual things to enjoy them. Only an Arahant uses his/her
sense faculties are indriya all the time. We will use just āyatana hereafter since indriya are
included there.
§ This is another way to define and analyze our world. Everything in our world belongs to those
12 āyatana. Sometimes they are called 6 ajjhatta āyatana (or internal āyatana or sense
faculties) and 6 bahiddha āyatana (things in the external world that we sense).
4. These are listed in Pāli in #6 of the post, “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis“. In English:
§ We touch the densest material (pottabba) out there with our bodies (kaya).
§ We taste next less dense tastes (rasa) with our tongues (jivha).
§ We smell with next less dense minute particles with smell (gandha) with our noses (ghāṇa).
§ We hear using vibrations propagating through air (sadda) with our ears (sota).
§ We see using photons propagating through space (varna) with our eyes (cakkhu).
§ Our consciousness arises via dhamma in the mind plane with our minds (mano).
5. The last type of rūpa (dhamma) are not solid matter, but just energy; see, “What are Dhamma? – A
Deeper Analysis“. They are not yet condensed to the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage.
§ Thus dhamma do not occupy space (ākasa) and are in the mind plane or the mental world.
§ All other five types of rūpa occupy space, and are in the material world.
§ So rūpa cannot be translated as “matter”. This is discussed in “Our Two Worlds: Material and
Immaterial“. This is why sometimes it is better use the Pāli words.
6. It is actually through a complicated process that a gadhabbaya sees, hears, etc while being inside a
physical body (karaja kaya) such as ours. I have explained the basics in “Citta and Cetasika – How
Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)- Introduction“, and many other
posts.
§ However, it is much easier to grasp how a gandhabba sees and hears while being outside the
physical body. Even though most of us may not have had such “out-of-body experiences”, it
can happen especially during heart operations; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“. Some people have a natural ability to do that on their own, as discussed in
that post.
§ Thus, let us discuss how a stand-alone gandhabba sees and hears, while being outside a
physical body; this is not only simpler, but provides us with some insights.
7. The actual sense faculties produced by kammic energy at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment are in the
kammaja kaya of the gandhabba. The fine body of the gandhabba has three components as we have
discussed and will again discuss below. The sense faculties are all in the kammaja kaya.
§ The kammaja kaya of the gandhabba has seven basic elements called dasaka, meaning entities
with ten items (decads). They arise from suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], which is composed of
eight “items” as we have discussed; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka
[Suddhaṭṭhaka]“. Different types of dasaka are formed just by incorporating one mode of spin
(bramana) and one mode of rotation (paribramana); see, “31 Realms Associated with the
Earth“.
§ One added component gives rise to jivita rūpa (pronounced “jeevitha roopa”); this is likely to
come from the spin (bramana) mode, but I cannot be certain. This jivita rūpa is in all these
other types of dasaka, because that is what “maintains life”. Thus different types of dasaka (see
below) arise due to different modes of rotation (paribramana).
8. Now we can list the different types of 7 dasaka (or decads) that are in the kammaja kaya of the
gandhabba .
§ Vatthu dasaka (mind; also called hadaya vatthu): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa +
hadaya rūpa
§ Kaya dasaka (body plan): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + kaya pasāda rūpa
§ Cakkhu dasaka (eye indriya): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + cakkhu pasāda rūpa
§ Sota dasaka (ear indriya): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + sota pasāda rūpa
§ Ghana dasaka (nose indriya): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + ghāṇa pasāda rūpa
§ Jivha dasaka (ear indriya): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + jivhā pasāda rūpa
§ Bhava dasaka (bhava): suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] + jivita rūpa + itthi or purisa rūpa
(determines female/male nature of the body)
Again, it is to be noted that jivita rūpa, itthi and purisa rūpa, and the five pasāda rūpa are not
“physical matter”, but modes of energy in spin and vibration of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka].
§ This is analogous to different electron orbitals giving rise to different types of molecules in
chemistry.
9. A gandhabba is born with those 7 dasakas (i.e., kammaja kaya) and immediately the mind starts
generating citta (thoughts), which are vipāka citta and for the most part in the bhavaṅga. Thus now
the gandhabba has a cittaja kaya as well. Note that cittaja kaya is all MENTAL.
§ Almost at the same time, both the kammaja kaya and the cittaja kaya start producing more
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] giving rise to the utuja kaya. This utuja kaya is similar to the
“aura” that surrounds our own bodies; in fact, that aura is part of our own (i.e., gandhabba‘s)
utuja kaya. Some people claim to be able to see aura; those with abhiññā powers can see them.
§ Thus the best way to visualize a gandhabba is to imagine a human with just the aura (without
the physical body). Since kammaja kaya consists of only a few suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka],
and the cittaja kaya is just thoughts, something like an “aura body” is all a gandhabba has.
§ Right now, this fine body of my gandhabba overlaps my own physical body. All parts of my
physical body are in the fine body of my gandhabba (which is a blueprint for my physical
body).
§ While waiting for a physical body, this gandhabba can inhale aroma from fruits, vegetables etc
and acquire a fine physical body (karaja kaya) too. Then it expands to the grown size of a
human, but of course is too fine to be seen by us.
§ Thus a free-standing gandhabba may have four types of “bodies”: kammaja kaya, cittaja kaya,
utuja kaya, and karaja kaya.
10. This gandhabba can actually see over large distances and hear over large distances and travel
instantly to far destinations. Sight does not need light and sound is not carried through vibrations
in the air. It is equivalent to seeing and hearing with abhiññā powers. In fact, this is how those with
abhiññā powers can see through walls and hear over large distances; they have control over their
gandhabba kaya or the manomaya kāya.
§ However, since it has only a very fine body (like air), it cannot taste food or touch solid things.
In order to use those sense faculties, the gandhabba needs to be inside a solid human body, i.e.,
it has to take possession of a zygote in a womb and build a physical body. This process is
described in “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
11. It is hard to believe, but when a gandhabba builds a physical body (inside a womb), those seven
dasakas — each of which are the “size of a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]” — determine all critical
functions as well as the blueprint for that physical body.
§ The physical body (karaja kaya) of the human is built according to kaya dasaka and bhava
dasaka, but also takes into account physical qualities mother and father (eye and skin color, as
well as size are good examples).
§ When inside a physical body, the external signals that come to the physical body via eyes, ears,
nose, tongue, body touches, are converted in the brain into the form that can be sensed by the 5
pasada rūpa (they are really the 5 dasakas with corresponding pasada rūpa). This somewhat
generation of cittas in the hadaya vatthu; see, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa
(Consciousness) Arises“. Important implications of this will also be discussed later.
2.5.7 Nibbāna in the Big Picture
July 8, 2016
Here we will discuss how one can get an idea about Nibbāna within the Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma.
1. In the posts in this series I described the wider world of 31 realms according to the Buddha, and
why ALL living beings have been just meandering through these 31 realms from beginning-less time.
We can summarize the results succinctly as follows:
§ The lowest four realms (apāyas) are where all beings suffer the most during the beginning-less
rebirth process. Unfortunately, this is where each and every living being spends the most time
in the long run. This is the real suffering that the Buddha tried to convey.
§ The fifth realm or the human realm is where one is most likely to be able to grasp Buddha
Dhamma and become a Sotāpanna. This is the only realm where one can experience (or at least
see) both suffering and sense enjoyments.
§ A deva in the next six realms is also capable of becoming a Sotāpanna, but due to the absence
of much visible suffering, incentive to strive for the Sotāpanna stage is almost non-existent
(think about a healthy, wealthy teenager!).
§ The same is true for rupi and arupi brahmas, who enjoy jhānic pleasures in the higher realms.
2. Thus one can clearly see that as one proceeds to higher realms, suffering is reduced in stages. The
worst sufferings are in the lowest 4 realms (apāyas), and we can see animal suffering if we pay
attention and think especially about the animals in the wild. There are no “old animals” in the wild.
As soon as they get a bit slow due to old age they are killed for food by stronger animals.
§ One could try to stay away from the apāyas (in future births) by avoiding from immoral acts.
But the problem with just that approach is that we have almost certainly done such immoral
acts in our previous lives, and thus are likely to have accumulated enough kamma seeds to be
born many times over in the apāyas.
§ Thus the key is to cleanse our minds of the worst defilements, which will prevent
apayagami citta from arising at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment; see, “Akusala Citta – How a
Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“. Such thoughts cannot just be suppressed; they arise in a
billionth of a second. Thus the practical way to do that is to reduce cravings (āsavas) in
STAGES; see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“, and “Gathi (Character), Anusaya
(Latent Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“.
§ As mentioned above, the first stage of the cleansing process is possible mainly in the human
and deva realms, but the incentive to do that is virtually non-existent in the deva realms.
2. Another subtle reason for the uniqueness of the human realm is that one’s future destiny is
MOSTLY determined while in the human realm. Humans are the unique species who can access all
89 types of citta that are present in all 31 realms. Moreover, they are the ones who can generate the
all important javana citta that can produce kamma beeja (seeds) for future existences (bhava).
§ Here is a simile that hopefully will convey this idea: Human realm can be compared to a
training school, and the other realms can be compared to where one gets employment
depending on one’s qualifications upon completing the training.
§ Those who did not make progress and caused problems for others are born in the apāyas and
will have to suffer the consequences. Another way to say this is to say that they cultivated
saṅkhāra (or gathi or habits) suitable for a being in the apāyas: cruel and hateful gathi
correspond to the lowest realm of niraya (hell); extreme greed correspond to the pretha realm;
those who are lazy and depend on others are born in the asura realm; those with different
combinations of those bad gathi are born in the animal realm.
§ Once born in the apāyas, they are more like programmed machines. They just suffer their fate
without having any way to even lessen the suffering (in contrast, humans are capable of
devising ways to make their lives better).
3. This last point is worth discussing a bit more.
As we can see, animals just live their lives like robots. They are incapable of sorting out moral from
immoral and also from being able to come up with ways to improve their lives. Birds have been
building the same kind of nests for billions of years. Ants have been building the same types of
anthills, and the dolphins (who are one of the animals with higher intelligence) have been the same
way over billions of years.
§ In the same way, rupi or arupi brahmas also just live their serene lives until the lifetime is
exhausted. It is like a nice vacation. Then they come back to the human realm and start over.
§ It is mostly humans and devas who are CAPABLE of forging their own future, but the devas
enjoy so much sense pleasure, they have no incentive to think about Nibbāna.
4. Continuing that analogy, those who do well in the training school can go to one of the 27 higher
realms. those who cultivate rūpa jhānas are born in the 16 rūpa realms. Those who cultivate higher
jhānas are born in the 4 arūpa realms. The brahmas in those 20 realms are like beings who are on a
nice, very long vacation. They just live happy lives in jhānic bliss.
§ Of course there are some brahmas who had attained a magga phala in either human or a deva
realm previously and they can proceed to higher stages. And there are a few rūpa realms
reserved for the Anāgāmīs only.
§ But in general, the rupi and arupi brahmas are the ones who graduated with high qualifications
and thus get to enjoy the fruits of those efforts for long times. Yet, when they come back to the
human realm, they may be born into environments where they could go in a wrong path and fail
next time around and thus could be born in the apāyas.
5. Those who want to enjoy sense pleasures without causing problems to others work on it by doing
meritorious deeds and are qualified to be born in the 6 deva realms (according to the level of merits
accrued). They may not have even known about Buddha Dhamma, but knew moral from immoral.
§ Life in a deva realm is more like a vacations to a “pleasure island”. Those who cultivate “deva
gathi” (high moral character, but with attachment to sense pleasures) are qualified for those
realms. Devas are more like humans but with fine bodies that do not age (until close to death),
and are not subject to diseases. Thus if one really wants to “enjoy sense pleasures” one should
focus more on doing good deeds instead of just focusing on making a lot money in this life,
because this human life is so short and the human body is subjected to diseases and old age
problems.
§ However, devas can build up extreme attachment to sense pleasures and are capable of tailoring
their future lives down to the animal realm. After their “pleasurable vacation” they could even
come back to the animal realm instead of the human realm.
6. Finally, those who cultivate “human gathi” are born in the human realm. They are more like deva
gathi, but generally have more attachment to sense pleasures at close contact.
§ However, those humans who may have cultivated high moral values AND had some inkling of
the sansāric suffering (via exposure to Buddha Dhamma) are like to come back to the human
realm to “complete their training”. That is because that is what they desired (upādāna).
§ That is a very simple outline of the existence in the 31 realms.
7. Now, if one has attained the Sotāpanna stage in the human realm, then his/her number of possible
destinations become less and better. In #7 and #8, we will discuss how a Sotāpanna goes through
higher realms as he/she approaches Arahanthood.
§ Of course that person will never be born in the apāyas, because those “apāya gathi” have been
permanently removed via Sammā Diṭṭhi with a grasp of the anicca nature.
§ A Sotāpanna starts to comprehend the futility and even dangers of sense pleasures (kāma rāga).
§ Then one first loses the desire to “own” sense objects (“vatthu kāma“) that provide sense
pleasures; one is merely satisfied with enjoying them. Thus one has not given up all kāma rāga,
just “vatthu kāma“. Now one is at that Sakadāgāmī stage, and will not be born again below the
deva realms. Thus one is freed from rebirth where diseases are possible (including the human
realm) and one is said to be “healthy forever”.
8. When a Sakadāgāmī contemplates on the anicca nature more (while in the human or deva realms)
he/she can remove klesha kāma and also paṭigha from their minds and become free of all kāma loka
realms. Then one becomes an Anāgāmī, i.e., not coming back to the kāma loka ever again.
§ But an Angami has not removed the liking for Dhamma, and thus will be born in one of the five
rūpa realms reserved for the Anāgāmīs. He/she will attain Nibbāna from there.
§ An Anāgāmī becomes an Arahant by removing rūpa rāga, arūpa rāga, māna, uddhacca, and
remaining avijjā.
§ Of course one can proceed all the way to the Arahanthood while in the human realm. An
Arahant will not be born anywhere in the 31 realms at death. His/her mind becomes free of
even a trace of matter that is subject to decay and destruction; see, “What Are Rūpa? (Relation
to Nibbāna)“.
9. This gives a brief summary of how a living being goes from realm to realm in the rebirth process,
until the Arahanthood is attained. It is NOT a random process. Everything happens due to causes.
The following are two (related) ways to analyze that process.
§ The key point to comprehend is that a birth in a given realm occurs because one has developed
gathi suitable for that realm; see, “Patisandhi Citta – How the Next Life is Determined
According to Gathi“.
§ One develops any kind of gathi by cultivating corresponding saṅkhāra, i.e., one tends to think,
speak, and act in ways suitable for that realm. This is what is described in detail in Paṭicca
Samuppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
10. It is also clear why it is futile to seek happiness anywhere in the 31 realms.
§ One could live for millions of years in deva realm with much higher sense pleasures than in the
human realm (and without being subjected to diseases), but then one has to come back to
human realm or even a lower realm.
§ Even if one is born in the highest brahma world (31st realm) and lives 84,000 eons in jhānic
bliss there (each eon is roughly 30 billion years!), one has to eventually come back to the
human realm and start over. Then at some point after that, birth in the apāyas is unavoidable.
This is why infinite time (or beginning-less time) is a concept that is hard to wrap one’s mind
around; see, “Infinity – How Big Is It?” and “Sansaric Time Scale“.
§ Thus one needs to contemplate whether it is worthwhile to seek happiness in a 100-year human
life! I know by experience that this is not easy to fully grasp, even when logically proven,
because our minds are enamored and blinded with sense pleasures. That truth starts to sink in
when the mind loses more and more defilements (greed, hate, and ignorance) and start seeing
the perils of sense pleasures to some extent.
1. Many people try to analyze and interpret Buddha Dhamma in terms of what is readily perceivable
through our six senses. However, there is much about this world that we are not aware of, as science
has shown in recent years; see below.
§ The Buddha said his Dhamma “had never been known to the world”. But many people try to
explain the core teachings of the Buddha using conventional concepts. This has happened ever
since Nagarjuana and other forefathers of “Mahayana Buddhism” tried to explain Nibbāna in
terms of various concepts such as “sunnata” or “emptiness”; see, “Saddharma Pundarika Sutra
(Lotus Sutra) – A Focused Analysis” and “What is Sunyata or Sunnata (Emptiness)?“.
§ The same thing happened to “Theravada Buddhism” too. Buddhaghosa, like Nagarjuana and
others, was not even a Sotāpanna and a Vedic brahmin before converting to “Buddhism”
molded and twisted Buddha Dhamma to fit his Vedic concepts; see, “Buddhaghosa’s
Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“.
§ Buddha’s anapana bhavana was replaced by the Vedic pranayama breath meditation, for
example.
2. It is quite possible that Buddhaghosa, Nagarjuna, and others did not intentionally try to
distort Buddha Dhamma, but just described Buddha Dhamma as they understood it with their
background in vedic concepts.
§ Even today, when people write books explaining what “Buddhism” is, they are also explaining
it in terms of their own mundane frames of reference.
§ This is why, when you look at most of the books written today about Buddha Dhamma, it
seems that there is not much difference between Buddha Dhamma and any other religion. They
all teach “how to live a moral life”.
§ There is very little discussion, if at all, on the foundational concepts such anicca, dukkha,
anatta, paṭicca samuppada, Anapanasati, Satipattana, and whatever discussed is mostly
incorrect.
3. I think this single fact is the biggest obstacle for most people in embarking on the “correct Path” or
even to get an idea of what real Buddha Dhamma is.
§ We really need to contemplate what the Buddha meant by when he said, “my Dhamma has
never been known to the world before”.
§ It is not something one can grasp within the “conventional framework”, what is readily
perceivable to a normal human with a defiled mind. It involves a wider world with 31 realms
(we see only the human and animal realms), and a rebirth process, and is based on Laws of
Kamma; see, “Essence of Buddhism – In the First Sutta“.
4. First let me clarify what I mean by “perceivable” or “comprehensible” to us as normal humans.
Our six senses can “detect” only a tiny sliver of the “world”.
§ At a base level, science today can account for only 4 percent of the mass of our universe; see,
“The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Race to Discover the Rest of
Reality”, by Richard Panek (2011).
§ There are many, many things that have not been “discovered” by science (or philosophy) yet,
and basically nothing significant about the MIND has been discovered yet.
5. Therefore, trying to gauge the validity of Buddha Dhamma using only the known facts from
science is like a blind man trying to figure out what an elephant looks like by touching a leg of the
elephant; see, “How do we Decide which View is Wrong View (Diṭṭhi)?“.
§ A frog living in a well does not know anything about the wider world. Similarly, a normal
human, including all the scientists, face the problem of trying to figure out the “reality” by only
using data available through our limited six senses. Thus it is impossible for a scientific theory
to be ever “complete” as proven by the mathematician Kurt Gödel; see, “Gödel’s
Incompleteness Theorem“.
6. Most people think and believe that the only way to confirm what the Buddha taught is to see
whether those teachings are compatible with science. However, it is not any different from believing
that one can get an idea of what an elephant looks like by asking a blind man who has touched the leg
of an elephant. OR asking a frog what the world outside the well looks like.
§ This may sound ridiculous to many, but let us think back a few hundred years. Just 400 years
ago, “science” believed in the geocentric model of the universe, i.e., that the Earth was at the
universe and that the stars were embedded in a celestial sphere far above; see: WebLink: wiki:
Geocentric model
§ Not only science, but all other major religions tried to attune their religions to this model at that
time, and most religions still adhere to those concepts; see the same Wikipedia article above.
7. But 2500 years ago, the Buddha clearly described our Solar system as a “Cakkavāla” or a planetary
system. Not only that, he also said there are uncountable such systems in the universe and that it is a
waste of time trying to find all the details about it.
§ Through the years, and especially since the beginning of the 20th century, science has “re-
discovered” some aspects of the Buddha’s wider world, including the existence of billions of
galaxies EACH OF WHICH contains billions of planetary systems like our Solar system.
§ But someone living in the 19th century was likely to ridicule the idea of innumerable planetary
systems (Cakkavāla) and could have said, “where is the evidence from science?”. That aspect
of Buddha Dhamma was not amenable to “science” at that time.
§ Just like that many aspects of Buddha Dhamma are not amenable to science at the
current time. But with time, more and more will be shown to be correct as science
advances.
8. In Abhidhamma, it is described in detail how all types of energies in the universe are “stored” in
orbital motions (“bramana” in Pali or Sinhala); see, “31 Realms Associated with the Earth“.
§ For example, planetary systems are planets orbiting stars. Those planetary systems combine to
make galaxies and those galaxies also undergo circular motion in shape of disks. see: WebLink:
wiki: Retrograde and prograde motion - Formation of celestial systems
§ Scientists discovered that atoms are basically electrons orbiting the tiny nucleus made out of
protons and neutrons.
9. If one is going to wait for the full confirmation of Buddha Dhamma by science, one is as foolish
as that person who lived five hundred years ago, and embraced the geocentric model and dismissed
Buddha Dhamma as “exotic” or “mystical”.
§ We are fortunate to live in a time where science had made impressive progress and has
confirmed many aspects of the Buddha’s world view.
§ Just as the invention of the telescope led to the discovery of a much bigger cosmos, the
discovery of the microscope (and its sophisticated versions) led to a previously unknown
“microscopic world” teeming with innumerable microscopic living beings. There are billions of
such beings in a single human body; see, “There are as many creatures on your body as there
are people on Earth!“.
10. Science can accept only those phenomena that can be observed and measured with scientific
instruments. Such scientific instruments are basically “extensions” for our six senses; see,
“Expanding “Consciousness” by Using Technology“.
§ For example, while we cannot see the moons of the Jupiter with our naked eyes, we can see
them with telescopes. While we cannot see those microscopic creatures in our bodies with our
naked eyes, we can see them with sophisticated microscopes. These are just two examples of
many.
§ When the Buddha said there are innumerable beings in this world, people looked around and
laughed. The Mahayanists are still under the impression that one could wait to attain the
Buddhahood itself (not merely Nibbāna) until “everyone” (presumably including all those
billions of microscopic creatures on one’s body) is ready to attain the Buddhahood!
11. This is just the tip of the iceberg. While science has confirmed that there are uncountable
planetary systems, it has not been able to find life on a single other planetary system yet. When
that happens, the “wait for the Buddhahood” for the Mahayanists will become much longer.
§ Similarly, the job of any “Creator” who looks after each and every being (even if just humans),
will also become unbearably burdensome, since there are uncountable world systems with
human beings as well.
§ I am not trying to make fun at the expense of others, but merely trying to get the point across
that, for those who can think for themselves, it is time to get rid of all such nonsensical beliefs
and wrong views; these are all micchā diṭṭhis.
§ Getting rid of such wrong views must be done before starting any fruitful meditation.
Purification through “correct views” comes before “purification through formal meditation”.
Sammā diṭṭhi or “correct views of this world” comes first in eightfold Path.
12. When we hear about something that cannot be explained with the CURRENT SCIENTIFIC
KNOWLEDGE, we ascribe those to “esoteric” or “mystical”. But while there are many such “made
up theories” that are out there without any substance, what is described in Buddha Dhamma can be
SHOWN TO BE CONSISTENT with all our knowledge of the world.
§ If we can bring back someone who had died before the 20th century, and tell him that we can
“see” an event going on in a distant country in real time, he will not believe it. If we turn on a
television and show him the actual event taking place, he will be flabbergasted; he will refuse
to believe it saying it is some sort of a magic trick.
§ But now we know that the visuals and sounds of that event can be transformed and transmitted
over long distances almost instantaneously, and can retrieve those signals by “tuning a
television set” to the correct frequency.
§ Working of kamma vipāka (energy stored) or rebirth taking place at a distant location work the
same way. Even though we cannot “see” or perceive, that energy can materialize when the
conditions become right; see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“. It will take some time to
really sink in these concepts, but the more you read, the more you will understand.
13. There are two key methods used in science to verify a given scientific theory: They have some
basic axioms that appear to be inviolable, AND all other currently accepted scientific theories must
be CONSISTENT with that theory.
§ If a currently accepted scientific theory is proven to be inconsistent with a newly discovered
phenomenon, then that scientific theory is discarded and a new theory is adopted.
§ No scientific finding up-to-date has shown to be inconsistent with pure Buddha Dhamma as
given in the Tipiṭaka.
§ However, there are many things in Buddha Dhamma that have not been confirmed by science.
More are being confirmed as new findings emerge.
§ And, Buddha Dhamma is self consistent. Thus my obsession with making sure all my posts are
inter-consistent.
14. Therefore, compatibility with “new findings” by science and self-consistency within the
foundational concepts, such as tilakkhana, Four Noble Truths, Noble Eightfold Path, Paṭicca
Samuppada, etc are the two ways to test the validity of Buddha Dhamma.
§ Here “new findings by science” does not necessarily mean the explanations given by science,
because scientific explanations can change with time (for example, the geocentric model had to
be changed).
§ If science finds evidence for life in outer space, that will be consistent with Buddha Dhamma,
but what science proposes as how such life arose may not be the correct one.
15. One needs to contemplate on the implications of these points (and there are many as I will
mention in other posts). How can a human being who lived 2500 years ago can come up with such an
elaborate way of describing material phenomena that are just beginning to be “re-discovered” by the
efforts of thousands of scientists over many generations?
§ It is quite clear that the Buddha was able to transcend all “normal human capabilities” by
purifying his mind. Thus Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem does not apply to Buddha Dhamma;
see #5 above.
§ Thus his Dhamma may not to “amenable” to the basic frame of reference that we all have as
normal human beings. Concepts like rebirth and kamma vipāka may sound mysterious. The
only way to see the truth in such concepts is to put them to the standard scientific method as
discussed above.
16. The fact remains that the Buddha was able to see those and much more just by purifying his mind.
And science has not yet figured out the “Power of the Human Mind“.
§ Modern science is way behind Buddha Dhamma regarding the mind; see the “Abhidhamma”
section.
§ Even though a human can purify the mind to the level of a Buddha only once in many eons on
the average, it is possible for each of us to purify our minds to enough extent to see many facts
about the nature that science is unaware of.
§ When that happens to a certain extent, then it becomes obvious that all these materialistic
advances (and any type of sense indulgence that can be brought about by such advances)
are insignificant compared to the sense of relief and well-being that one can achieve by
purifying one’s mind.
17. For example, while one can enjoy even the best food on Earth only while eating that food, even
the jhanic experiences (Ariya or even anariya jhānas) can be long term. One could stay in a jhāna for
hours and enjoy that sense of relief.
§ The “base level” of “cooling down” or Nibbāna or “niveema” or “nivana” that comes at the
Sotāpanna stage is forever, and cannot be compared to any briefly-lived sense pleasure.
2.7 Sansāric Time Scale, Buddhist Cosmology, and the Big Bang Theory
1. In order to really understand the Buddha’s message, one needs to grasp the unimaginable length of
the saṃsāra (the rebirth process). The Buddha said that there is no discernible beginning to life. It
always existed, and it will exist until one attain Nibbāna.
§ Infinity is a mind-boggling concept; see, “The Infinity Problem in Buddhism“.
2. This a bit difficult concept for many, because many cultures/religions have the concept of a set
time of Creation. If there is a First Cause (such as Creation), then there must be a time that everything
got started. But if there is no Creation, then there cannot be a set time for a beginning.
§ Even as recently as at beginning of the 1900’s, Lord Kelvin, one of the top scientists of the day,
estimated that the age of the Sun was < 40 million years based on gravitational contraction
(atomic structure was not known at that time), and our knowledge of the universe was pretty
much limited to the Solar system.
3. Vindication of the Buddha’s teachings on the long saṃsāra started at the beginning of the 1900’s
with the advent of quantum mechanics and relativity: Discovery of radioactivity in 1898 by
Becquerel and Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect in 1905 led to the quantum theory of
atomic structure, which in turn led to the correct picture of atomic fusion as the source of solar
energy.
§ So, by 1956, the age of the solar system was known to be > 4 billion years. Yet, even billions of
years is hardly the same as “beginning-less time”!
4. But there was more to be discovered. By 1929, Edwin Hubble proved that the distant galaxies are
moving away from each other and from our galaxy, and that our galaxy is but just one of many
galaxies. This was a vast understatement since now we know that there are billions of galaxies in our
observable universe! And they are flying away from each other, i.e, the universe is expanding.
§ The discovery of the microwave background radiation in the 1960’s led to the conclusion that
our universe started off with the “Big Bang” about 14 billion ago.
§ However, it is just a theory.
5. The mostly accepted explanation for such “big bang origin of the universe” is the inflationary
theory of Alan Guth (see, “The Inflationary Universe” by Alan Guth, 1997). In the inflation theory, if
one “Big Bang” is possible, then it is a given that many other “Big Bangs” are possible. The total
energy of our universe is completely consistent with adding up to zero.
§ If a universe requires a sum total of zero energy to produce, then “the universe is the ultimate
free lunch”, as Guth explains in his book (pp. 247-248). Thus, implied in the inflation theory is
the existence of multiple universes.
§ According to the “cyclic theory” model, which is an alternate theory, the same universe comes
to a “Big Crunch” which leads to another Big Bang, and whole process keeps repeating. So,
there is no beginning to time either; time is infinite.
6. There are several theories currently being explored in quantum mechanics that are related to
cosmology. There is one theory that requires a universe being existing for each possible event! So,
there may be infinite number of parallel universes. For example, see “The Beginning of Infinity” by
David Deutsch (2011). In all these theories there are multiple universes that always exist.
§ If that is not enough to boggle one’s mind, there is another theory in quantum mechanics called
the “Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”. It speculates that multiple universes
are created at each time a quantum event takes place!
7. Buddha’s explanation of how the universe operates is detailed in the Aggañña Sutta (DN27).
However, all English translations available today are not correct. A good translation of the sutta with
details would need to good background in Buddha Dhamma.
§ I provided a summary of that “Buddhist Cosmology” in a recent discussion at the discussion
forum: “WebLink: Multiverse: Different Physical Laws and Different Dhamma?“.
§ Also see, “Infinity – How Big Is It?“.
8. I would like to close this essay with a simile from the Buddha that he used to describe the
unimaginable length of saṃsāra, and to point out that our time in this life is less than a blink of an
eye compared to the length of saṃsāra. The Buddha used a great eon as the measurement unit to help
his followers visualize the enormous length of saṃsāra.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, the Earth keeps going through a cyclic process: it forms, stays in that
state, starts being destroyed, and stays in that destroyed state. That whole process takes a great
eon (mahā kappa) , and then the whole process repeats, again and again.
§ The length of a great eon (mahā kappa) is said by the Buddha to be longer than the time it
would take a man to wear away a mountain of solid granite one yojanā (about 7 miles) around
and one yojanā high, by stroking it once every hundred years with a silk cloth.
§ These days scientists use the word “eon” to denote the duration of a universe (from the “big
bang” either to a “big crunch” or just fading away). That will be proven to be incorrect in the
future. I hope I will live to that day!
9. Just for fun, I estimated the mass of the material that needs to be removed by the silk cloth each
time (this happens every 100 years). Using a 7 mile cube of stone with a density of 2515 kg per cubic
meter, I calculate the mass of the mountain to be 3.5 x 10 ^6 kg.
§ Assuming the lifetime of our Solar system to be 10 billion years, I calculate the mass removed
by each stroke is about 36 grams or about 1.2 ounces. This appears to be a reasonable number!
§ So, a mahā kalpa in Buddha Dhamma turns out to be approximately an eon as perceived by the
scientists. When we try to visualize the wearing off a mountain we can imagine how long a
time period that is.
10. Yet, that is still nothing compared to the length of the saṃsāra. Infinity is a concept that is hard to
wrap one’s mind around; see, “Infinity – How Big Is It?”.
§ One day the bhikkhus asked the Buddha how many great eons had already passed and gone by.
The Buddha told them, “Suppose, bhikkhus, there were four disciples here each with a lifespan
of hundred years, and each day they were each to recollect a hundred thousand great eons.
There would still be great eons not yet recollected by them when those four disciples pass away
at the end of hundred years. Because, bhikkhus, this saṃsāra is without discoverable
beginning”.
§ Another simile given by the Buddha to indicate the length of saṃsāra is the following: Each
and every living being has been one’s mother, father, or a close relative in this unimaginably
long saṃsāra.
§ One could get an idea of why infinity is so hard to fathom by reading about what scientists say
about infinity; a very entertaining book is “The Beginning of Infinity” (2011) by the physicist
David Deutsch.
January 24, 2019: Relevant post: “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
July 20, 2019: New series on “Origin of Life“.
One needs to look at the mounting evidence without any preconceived ideas. There is no plausible
way to explain these accounts from a purely “materialistic” point of view, i.e., that consciousness
arises from inert matter.
4/25/17: Here is a video of a recent discussion on Western research on children’s past lives, Near
Death Experiences, etc:
WebLink: Youtube: Is There Life after Death? Fifty Years of Research at UVA
Rebirth Accounts
The late Professor Ian Stevenson at the University of Virginia conducted over 20 years of research on
the authenticity of rebirth accounts, which is being continued by Professor Jim Tucker. Several books
about rebirth have been written by these two professors. A good book is “Twenty Cases Suggestive
of Reincarnation” by Ian Stevenson. By the way, Professor Stevenson became a Buddhist later on in
his life presumably because of his studies (see, “Rebirth as Doctrine and Experience” by Francis
Story (2003); first edition 1975). He mentions this in the Introduction he wrote to this book by
Francis Story; I have scanned that introduction: “Introduction to “Rebirth by Francis Story – Ian
Stevenson“.
Here is a video that discusses the work of the late Dr. Ian Stevenson, Dr. Jim Tucker, and colleagues
at the University of Virginia:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Evidence of Reincarnation
In their book, “Soul Survivor: The Reincarnation of a World War II Fighter Pilot”, by Bruce and
Andrea Leininger detail the amazing story of their son’s recount of a past life, mentioned in the above
video. Here is a ABC News report on the story:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Reincarnation - Airplane Boy
Here is another story of the rebirth of a Civil War General:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Reincarnation, BORN AGAIN?
Here is a three-year old chanting Buddhist suttas (and doing a very good job). Can a three-year old
memorize such complex lines of suttas?
WebLink: YOUTUBE: 3-year-old boy in Isan chants in Pāli
Child Prodigies
Another piece of evidence comes from child prodigies. Here is the story about Jake Barnett from a 60
Minutes report:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Jacob (Jake) Barnett "Math and Science Prodigy" on 60 Minutes
1. Many people say that direct “proof” for rebirth cannot be given; it is actually the other way around:
If someone can convince oneself that just one of those rebirth accounts MUST BE TRUE, then there
is no way to explain it by any other way.
§ If there is a connection between two lives that lived in two geographical locations (also
separated by time), there is no explanation for that in current science, i.e., no way to make a
connection between the DNA of those two “persons”. A purely materialistic view cannot
explain it.
§ Recent findings in science show that matter in different locations are entangled at a
fundamental level; see, “Quantum Entanglement – We Are All Connected“. Also, “a living
being just goes from one physical body to another”; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a
Lifestream“.
2. There is a way one could actually recollect one’s own past lives going back to many lives. This is
possible by developing the fourth jhāna and then cultivating extrasensory powers; see, “Power of the
Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhānas“.
3. Also, it is by having this presumption of rebirth that all of the seeming anomalies and inequalities
of life can be explained; see, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek Good Rebirths“.
§ And how could we ever explain the birth of such prodigies as Jeremy Bentham, who already in
his fourth year could read and write Latin and Greek; or John Stuart Mill, who at the age of
three read Greek and at the age of six wrote a history of Rome; or Babington Macaulay, who in
his sixth year wrote a compendium of world history; or Beethoven, who gave public concerts
when he was seven; or Mozart, who already before his sixth year had written musical
compositions; or Voltaire, who read the fables of Lafontaine when he was three years old.
§ Does it not seem infinitely more probable that all these prodigies and geniuses, who in many
cases came from illiterate parents, had already in previous births laid the foundations for their
extraordinary faculties?
Here is a list of child prodigies from Wikipedia. You will recognize many of the names:
List of Child Prodigies
Here is the link to Wikipedia article on child prodigies:
Child Prodigy
Healing with Hypnosys
The late Dr. Richard Feynman was sceptical about the claims in hypnosis studies until he subjected
himself to hypnosis in two different occasions. In both instances, he verified for himself that if done
correctly hypnosis works. He describes these two cases in his book, “Surely You’re Joking, Mr.
Feynman!” (1985), pp. 66-68.
Hypnosis provides yet another set of “supporting material”. There are many cases of people
remembering past lives when hypnotized. It is hard to evaluate the validity of most such cases.
However, there is a branch of hypnosis that uses it as therapy. Some people seem to have “phobias”
based on a horrific event from a past life. They cannot figure out why they have these phobias, but
when a hypnotist brings out that experience, they become cured. Here is a 20/20 documentary of
three such cases, where they vouch for the authenticity of the therapy sessions:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Past Lives
There are hundreds of youtube videos on rebirth stories and also many on child prodigies and
hypnosis-based curing of certain ailments.
Following books are also good reads:
Discussion
1. Some of you may be wondering whether there is a inconsistency here. I have repeatedly mentioned
that the Buddha clearly stated that it is extremely rare to be born a human. Yet, from the above rebirth
case studies it appears that people have been born in human realm in successive lives. If it is so hard
to attain a human birth, how can this be?
2. There is nothing inconsistent. The key problem here is another misinterpretation. “Bhava” or an
existence is not the same as a “jathi” or a birth; see, “Patiicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppada”“, and subsequent posts. A living being, upon exhausting the kammic
energy for one existence, grabs hold of another strong kammic potential for the next existence. If the
energy of that kammic potential is large, the being may be reborn many times in that existence until
that kammic energy is exhausted (life span of a certain existence is limited; maximum of 120 years
for a human, about 20 years for dog, etc.).
3. Thus, if one has done a highly meritorious deed, and at some point in saṃsāra latches on to that
“kamma seed” (see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“), that energy may be able to
sustain that existence for many rebirths.
§ In these cases, when physical death occurs BEFORE exhausting the energy of the kamma seed,
the manomaya kāya (also called gandhabba) leaves the dead body and waits until a suitable
womb is ready; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“. In this case, the gandhabba may
carry the physical resemblance to the next life, including scars of any significant wounds, birth
marks, etc.
§ When rebirth takes place there, the new physical body could have many resemblances to the old
body. In many rebirth cases, such physical resemblances have been confirmed (as in the case of
the civil war general in one of the above videos).
4. In summary, it is important to remember that in Paṭicca Samuppāda, it is “upādāna paccayā
bhavo”,“, i.e., grasping or craving (upādāna) that leads to existence (bhava);): for example, existence
as a dog. That existence (bhava) may have enough kammic energy to support several repeated births
as a dog. Therefore, once a given bhava or existence is grasped, the next step of “bhava paccayā
jāti”,“, will lead to repeated births as a dog until that kammic energy is exhausted; see, “Bhava and
Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
5. On the other hand, if the kammic energy for that “bhava” has run out by the time death occurs, then
a new “bhava” will be grasped at the death moment, and the resulting gandhabba that comes out will
be quite different. For example, if a human has exhausted the kammic energy for that human
existence (bhava) and a kammic seed for a bhava (existence) of an elephant is grasped, then the
gandhabba that results will have the “imprint” for an elephant, and will find an elephant womb to be
born in the next life.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
56 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
6. It may be difficult to grasp these concepts initially. One needs to look up the links given and may
need to go back several layers to grasp these ideas. It is not possible to explain everything in one post.
Buddha Dhamma can be very deep, if one wants to really comprehend how the nature works.
Next, “The Four Stages in Attaining Nibbāna“, …………….
1. Most people know about Buddha Gotama as a very intelligent and compassionate human being. In
“Dhamma and Science – Introduction“, I pointed out the similarities and differences between a
scientist and a Buddha. Here I want to discuss in detail the incomprehensible complexity of a human
mind, and how a Buddha achieves the peak performance of that complex entity.
§ As I pointed out in “Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem“, a normal human mind works within the
sense sphere of a normal human and thus inherently incapable of providing a complete theory
about our world; but the mind of a Buddha can transcend our sensory experience and see the
whole of existence.
§ Here I point out, in a systematic way in a series of posts, the progression of the human mind to
higher levels achieved by purifying the mind (not by merely learning), and why a Buddha is at
the very pinnacle. At the end of this series you will see why no other human being, no matter
how intelligent, can even remotely approach the mind of a Buddha.
2. In the “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“, we discussed the 31 realms of existence as laid
out by the Buddha.
§ Out of these, the human realm is at the fifth level (and our knowledge base is limited to our
sensory experience within it, and Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem applies to any theory
derived within it). There are four realms below the human realm, AND 26 realms above.
§ Out of the 31 realms, we can see only the human realm and the animal realm (which is one of
the four lower realms or the apāyas). But we can access the thoughts enjoyed by the beings in
the higher realms, AND we can access the transcendental (lokuttara) cittās too. Please do not
put too much significance initially to the number of cittās in each realm, etc. Be patient with me
as I need to lay out the “big picture” first.
§ As we proceed systematically in a few posts, you will see various connections to other concepts
discussed in other parts on the site, and eventually all fit together. This is why I keep saying
that it is a complete and self-consistent world view on a scale unimaginable to a normal
(unpurified) human mind.
3. The types of thoughts (cittās) that can be experienced in the whole of existence (31 realms) is 89
(or 121 depending on the scheme); see, “The 89 (or 121) Types of Cittas“. In the three main lokas (or
planes) of kāmaloka, rupaloka, and arupaloka, different types of cittās are of common occurrence.
While most of the 89 cittās are possible in all three lokas, normally a subset of cittās operate
mostly in a given realm.
§ For example, in the kāmaloka, only 54 cittās are mainly experienced. The kāmaloka consists of
the lower eleven realms, with sixth through eleventh shells representing the realms of the devas.
Beings in these 11 realms have all six sense bases, and in the deva realms the sense pleasures
are higher than in the human realm.
4. Out of all 89 types of thoughts, only 12 are immoral or akusala cittās and these are experienced
only in kāmaloka; see, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta”.
§ In the higher 20 realms belonging to the rupaloka and arupaloka, only jhānic cittās are mostly
present, and akusala cittās normally do not arise.
§ So, as one can imagine, the beings in the lower realms entertain more immoral cittās, and with
higher frequency too. Human realm is kind of in the middle, with both moral and immoral
cittās.
§ Mostly vipāka citta arise in the lowest four realms; they basically “pay for their previous
kamma“. It is said that the beings in the lowest realm, niraya (hell) experience basically two
immoral cittās based on hate, because of the high degree of suffering there.
5. The human realm is unique in that the human mind can access not only the cittās in the rūpa
and arūpa lokas, but also the eight types of cittas that transcend the 31 realms. These cittās are
the four path (magga) cittās for the four levels of Nibbāna (Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī,
Arahant), and the corresponding resultant (phala) cittas. Thus all 89 types of citta are possible for a
human.
§ Beings in the higher realms can also attain the 8 magga/pahala citta, but do not normally
experience the cittā that are typical of the lower realms.
§ Furthermore, the most potent cittās, those with highest javana (impulse) power in “mahā
kusala citta“. They are accessible mostly by humans and those in higher realms; see,“Javana of
a Citta – Root of Mental Power“. More posts will follow in the future.
§ This is the basis of the power of the human mind. It is possible for a human to attain the
mindset of a being in the lowest realm (niraya) and it is possible also to go all the way up to the
mindset of a Buddha.
6. The cittās in the rupaloka and arupaloka are easily categorized according to the jhānic states.
These are the same jhānic states attained by people via meditation.
§ A human can attain all eight jhānic states, and the lower four correspond to the rupaloka and
the higher four to the arupaloka.
§ By the way, the Buddha never referred to the arupāvacara states as jhānās. Rather they are
referred to in the suttās by their names: ākāsānancāyatana, viññānancāyatana, etc.
§ Each jhānic state correspond to three types of cittas: wholesome (kusala) citta and the
corresponding vipāka (resultant) citta are two; when the same jhānic kusala citta experienced
by an Arahant it is called a kriyā (functional) citta, because it does not lead to a vipāka citta.
7. In the 16 realms belong to the rupaloka, where only two physical sense faculties (eye and ear) are
active. These beings have very fine (less dense) bodies.
§ In rupaloka 15 types of thoughts (citta) are mostly experienced corresponding to the five jhānic
factors: vitakka, vicara, pīti, sukha, ekggata; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or
Mundane Jhānas“. These are the lower five jhānic kusala cittas, corresponding five vipāka
cittās and five kriyā cittās (the last five are effective only for the Arahants who get into these
jhānic states).
§ The highest four realms represent the arūpa lokas, where beings have ultra fine bodies and only
the mind faculty; no physical senses. Here there are only 12 types of jhānic citta mainly
present. These are the higher four (fifth through eighth) jhānic kusala cittas, corresponding four
vipāka citta, and corresponding four kriyā citta (which are effective only for the Arahants who
get into these jhānic states, which do not have corresponding vipāka citta).
8. The rupaloka and arupaloka are collectively known as Brahma realms, which comprise the higher
20 realms. In the Brahma realms, beings are mostly devoid of both greed and hate, but they have
dormant ignorance (moha) in their kamma seeds; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma
Vipāka“. In the deva worlds (which belong to kāmaloka), those beings are mostly devoid of hate-
rooted cittās, but have greed-rooted cittās since they enjoy sensual pleasures.
§ It is possible for a human to attain any of those jhānic states via samatha meditation, and one
does not have to be a Buddhist to attain those mundane or anariya jhānic states.
§ Those anariya jhānic states are temporary; a yogi in a jhānic state can be “taken out” of the
jhāna; see the next post. They may be lost if one does not keep practicing, and the ability to
enter such jhānās is lost when one dies, i.e., he/she may not have the ability to get into jhānās
in the next life, even if they are born human.
§ However, if one dies while in even an anariya jhānic state, he/she will be born in the
correspondingrupaloka or arupaloka. Yet, a being who gets into even the highest arupaloka
via anariya jhānās will end up eventually in the four lower realms (apāyās).
§ However, Ariya jhānas are permanent. Once one gets into an Ariya jhāna, it will hold through
future lives.
More information with references to suttās at: “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
2.9.2 Difference Between Jhāna and Stages of Nibbāna
1. There are many misconceptions on the relationship between jhāna and magga phala (the four
stages of Nibbāna). Some view that jhāna are necessary to attain magga phala, and others believe
that being able to get into jhāna means one has attained magga phala.
§ The first assumption is wrong, and the second is true if one has attained an Ariya jhāna.
§ We can resolve these issues by looking into what are meant by jhāna and magga phala, and
also the difference between anariya and Ariya jhāna.
2. One attains magga phala (various stages of Nibbāna) by permanently removing greed, hate, and
ignorance (about the nature of this world or Tilakkhaṇa): “Ragakkhayo Nibbanan, Dosakkhayo
Nibbanan, Mohakkhayo Nibbanan“.
§ This can also be stated as, “one needs to remove 7 anusaya” or equivalently “10 samyojana” to
attain Nibbāna. At the Sotāpanna stage one removes 2 anusaya and 3 samyojana; see,
“Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna“.
§ The most commonly used evaluation is that a Sotāpanna has removed the three samyojana
of sakkaya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, and silabbata paramasa.
§ Therefore, a critical first step for attaining magga phala is to be exposed to the correct
interpretations of anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong
Interpretations“.
§ The second step is of course to grasp the anicca (and dukkha and anatta) saññā to some extent;
see, “What is Saññā (Perception)?“.
3. Jhāna (sometimes written as “dyāna“) can provide blissful bodily sensations. These arise due to
the “cleansing of the physical body and the nervous system” induced by “defilement-free” thoughts;
see, “Jhānic Experience in Detail – Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2)“.
§ Jhāna are mental states corresponding to rupavacara and arupavacara relams; they still
belong to “this world” of 31 realms. Just like the human realm is “more peaceful in general”
than the animal realm, jhānic states are “more peaceful in general” than the human realm.
§ We all have been born in most of the 31 realms (except for the realms reserved for the
Anāgāmis) an uncountable times, and thus had attained those jhānic states uncountable times in
previous lives.
§ Even this second phenomenon of jhāna is completely outside the realm of modern science.
Scientists cannot explain jhānic phenomena, but soon they will not be able to ignore these as
“hallucinations”, because more and more people are attaining jhāna.
5. My late Noble teacher, Waharaka Thero, has given the following simile to explain the main
difference between a jhāna and magga phala. I hope you have at least heard about — preferably seen
— an old oil lantern with a glass enclosure where the wick is soaked in oil or gasoline that comes up
through the wick from a built-in reservoir.
§ If gasoline is contaminated, the glass enclosure gets dirty quickly. In the same way, our defiled
thoughts leads to a “contamination effect” in our physical body.
§ Many body ailments, including bodily pains and even diseases COULD BE reduced by
cleansing one’s mind. Of course, those initially arise due to kamma vipāka, and the stronger
ones may not be overcome by this process; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined
by Kamma?“.
6. Our thoughts can be compared to the burning wick and the physical body to the glass enclosure, in
the above simile. When the thoughts become defiled, the body will be “contaminated” giving rise to
discomforts and even diseases. We will discuss the causes below.
§ The glass enclosure of the lamp needs to be taken out and cleaned in order to get the lamp to
shine bright again, i.e., to make the “body of the lamp” clean again.
§ In contrast, there is a built-in mechanism for our bodies to be cleansed.
§ This built-in mechanism is our cittaja kaya or our thoughts. We can state the basic mechanism
this way: The javana citta in our thoughts (cittaja kaya) produce good or bad energy fields
called utuja kaya. These are actually rūpa below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage (very
fine), which are analogous to electromagnetic waves in physics.
§ Bad thoughts associated with dasa akusala lead to the contamination of the body, and good
thoughts generate utuja kaya that can clean-up such contamination.
§ The “Search box” on the top right can be used to find more relevant posts, if one needs more
information on these terms.
7. This utuja kaya (which is really an energy field) can and does affect our physical body. This is why
people who are depressed, or have high levels of anger or greed, are more likely to be subjected to
ailments and diseases, and people with joyful mindsets have relatively healthy bodies.
§ This effect can be enhanced via nirāmisa sukha that arises due to “moral living”. The more one
stays away from the dasa akusala, the more happier one becomes, and starts feeling “sukha” in
the body itself. It may not be fast, but it definitely happens over time.
§ It can be much more enhanced by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa. The difference here is that one
will then stay away from dasa akusala mainly because one would have realized the
fruitlessness and danger of seeking sensual pleasures by committing dasa akusala.
8. I have discussed — starting with basics — how our thoughts can affect our well-being in the
“Living Dhamma” section. Understanding those basic concepts is crucial in order to understand
deeper concepts and to do Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā effectively as discussed later in that
section.
§ When defiled thoughts are suppressed at least for short times (during a desanā or while reading
Dhamma), one’s mind becomes joyful and one will be able to get to samādhi for a short time
(tadanga pahāna).
§ In fact, they were able to cultivate powerful abhiññā and even travel through the air. Therefore,
it is possible that those who get into the fourth anariya jhāna will also experience the “white
light” surrounding them.
§ As long as one’s mind can be kept away from greedy and hateful thoughts such states of
samādhi and jhāna can be maintained for long times (vikkambana pahāna).
§ This is related to the fact how people can go to even anariya meditation retreats (breath
meditation) and attain a sense of peace for many days at a stretch. However, when they come
back and get back into the regular lifestyle, it slowly fades.
11. The problem is that those effects, no matter how powerful, are only temporary with anariya
jhāna. They have not removed the root cause for getting attached to greed and hate. They remain
hidden deep down as anusaya/samyojana.
§ This is discussed in detail in “Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhāna“.
§ Jhāna belong to the 31 realms: “Sīla, Samādhi, Paññā to Paññā, Sīla, Samādhi“.
12. Now we are getting closer to see the difference between anariya and Ariya jhāna.
§ The main difference difference between them is that Ariya jhāna are permanent, since they are
attained via REMOVING and not just SUPPRESSING some of those anusaya/samyojana.
§ Once removed via wisdom (paññā) when attaining the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, some of
those anusaya/samyojana are permanently removed from one’s mind (ucceda pahāna).
§ After that, no matter how strong an attractive/hateful sense input comes in, strong defiled
thoughts CANNOT arise in a Sotāpanna; see, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids
Apayagami Citta“, and other relevant posts in the “Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna“.
13. The remaining key to the puzzle is that it is possible to attain magga phala just by getting into
samādhi and not necessarily to jhāna.
§ There are many types of people based on their gathi (personalities) and capabilities: saddhā,
viriya, samādhi, sati, paññā. In fact, the suttas in the Tipiṭaka are separated to five Nikāyas
based on that so that people can study appropriate suttas for them, see, “Nikāya in the Sutta
Pitaka“.
§ Without getting into details, people with predominantly paññā indriya can attain magga phala
without going through jhāna.
§ Others can go through jhānas to attain magga phala. This is not clear-cut, but just to get an
idea.
14. The bottom line is that jhānas can be quite helpful in getting to magga phala. Furthermore, one
may attain both within reasonably short times. But magga phala (at least the Sotāpanna stage)
comes before Ariya jhāna are attained.
§ The reason is that ucceda pahāna mentioned in #11 that is necessary for the Ariya jhāna,
cannot take place unless one has comprehended the Tilakkhaṇa and attained the Sotāpanna
stage.
§ One normally attains Ariya jhāna by recalling the (stage of) Nibbāna that one has seen, and the
“cooling down” that one has thus experienced; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Ariya
Jhānas“.
15. For people with high levels of paññā, even brief state of samādhi, called tadanga pahāna (see #7
above) is enough to attain the Sotāpanna stage. A famous example is Bahiya Daruchiriya who
attained the Arahantship upon hearing just a single verse.
§ Then there are accounts of many people who attained the Sotāpanna stage via vishkambana
pahāna (see #7 and #9 above), mainly while listening to a desanā by the Buddha.
§ For example, Alavaka yaksa (not a niraya yaksa but a deva yaksa) threatened the Buddha just
before sitting down to listen to a desanā and attained the Sotāpanna stage during the desanā.
Angulimala chased the Buddha with the intention of killing him, but attained the Sotāpanna
stage immediately afterwards.
§ More information on the three kinds of pahāna can be found at, “What Are Kilesa (Mental
Impurities)? – Connection to Cetasika“.
16. Therefore, there can be people with magga phala without any anariya or Ariya jhāna.
§ If there are people with magga phala without jhāna, they cannot not experience the “jhānic
sukha” in the body. Even though they do not generate “bad thoughts” to further contaminate
their bodies, they have not cleansed the old contaminants. Jhānic javana citta (that can run
continuously for long times, compared to just 7 javana citta in a normal citta vīthi) are like
laser beams that can clean contaminants in the body even in an anariya jhāna; see, #4 of “Citta
Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
§ In the simile of #4 above, this is like a wick not emitting any more smoke, but the glass
enclosure not yet cleaned.
§ Of course, it would be easier for a person with magga phala to attain Ariya jhāna, and they will
not attain anariya jhāna.
17. Finally, from the above discussion it appears that the only way to confirm the attainment of the
Sotāpanna stage is to see whether one has removed the three samyojana (sanyojana) of sakkaya
diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, and silabbata paramasa; see, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?“.
§ And that cannot be determined by anyone else, but oneself.
18. April 28, 2018: I found a desanā by Waharaka Thero where he present clear evidence that jhāna
are not necessary to attain magga phala:
WebLink: Download “Are Jhāna Required for Magga-Phala”
§ The main point the Thero makes is that we know that there are jāti Sotāpannas born in the
human realm. But if a jhāna was REQUIRED to attain the Sotāpanna stage, then that person
WOULD NOT be born in the human realm, but in a brahma realm corresponding that jhāna.
More information with references to suttās at: “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
2.9.3 Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhānas
1. The 54 types of cittas (thoughts) belonging to the kamaloka (called kamavacara cittas) are not
very strong; they can just have enough power to grasp the thought object (arammana in Pāli or
aramuna in Sinhala).
§ The power of a thought comes from javana; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental
Power” for an analysis based on Abhidhamma.
§ But the jhānic cittas belonging to the rupaloka and arupaloka have much more power and have
a firm grasp of the object. This is why it is possible for someone who can get to the fourth
jhānic state to acquire some capabilities that exceed the “normal” human potential, like
telekinetic (move things with the mind) or the ability to see or hear from long distances; see
below.
§ The Pāli word “jhāna” has two roots: “to concentrate” and also “to burn up”.
2. The Anariya or mundane jhānas are attained simply by SUPPRESSING the five hindrances. One
simply focuses the mind forcefully onto one thought object, not letting those five hindrances come to
surface.
§ Since there is only one citta at a time (even though there are billions of cittas a second), when
one forces the mind to one thought object, the five hindrances are kept at bay, and one feels the
serenity of a mind unpolluted by the hindrances. This is called samatha meditation.
3. Thus attaining mundane jhānas is purely a mechanistic process. While some Buddhists use them to
calm the mind before getting into insight (vipassana) meditation, it is used widely by the Hindus.
Even before the Buddha, there were many Hindu yogis who could attain the highest jhānas.
§ There are many reports of people of other faiths also attaining such jhānic states (see, for
example, “Interior Castle” by the Christian nun St. Teresa of Avila; edited by E. Allison Peers,
1946, for a fascinating description of “seven mansions” which seem to correspond to these
jhānic states).
§ But such jhānic states are not permanent; one could lose them in an instant, if the moral
conduct is broken and defiled thoughts (anusaya) come to the surface (anusaya).
4. There are many techniques for conducting such samatha meditation. The popular ones are breath
(whether focusing the mind on the breath at the nostrils or on the rising/falling of the stomach) and
kasina meditation (where a certain object, for example a colored disk is used to focus the attention
on). As one’s mind gets absorbed in that object, the five hindrances are suppressed, and the mind
advances to higher and higher calm states.
§ Obviously, it is easier to attain jhānic states via samatha meditation if one follows at least the
five precepts (not killing, stealing, sexually misbehaving, lying, or taking drugs or alcohol).
This is because the greedy and hateful thoughts are at a lower baseline state for a person
observing the five precepts.
§ If one abstains from all ten immoral acts (dasa akusala), then it is even easier to calm the mind
and to attain these jhānic states; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
5. The five jhānic states corresponding to the cittas in the rupaloka themselves are related to the five
hindrances. To get to the first jhānic state, one needs to suppress the five hindrances; this is done by
developing five sobhana [beautiful qualities of consciousness] mental factors (sobhana cetasika) to
counter the five hindrances:
§ Vitakka inhibits the hindrance of sloth and torpor (thina middha). This is how one trains to
direct the mind to one thought object, say the breath. Vitakka is normally translated as “initial
application”, but it comes from “tharka” or going back and forth among many arammana
(thought objects); when this is stopped one has “vitharka” or vitakka, i.e., staying on one
thought object, for example, breath or a kasina object.
§ Sustained application (vicara; pronounced “vichāra”) is the continued presence of the mind on
that object, i.e., maintaining concentration on that object; vicara comes from stopping “chara”
or moving around. Vitakka and vicara are compared to a bee flying towards a flower and then
buzzing and hanging around the flower while extracting honey from it. Vicara serves to
temporarily inhibit the hindrance of vicikicchā.
§ As the mind gets absorbed in the object, thoughts of ill will are suppressed and zest or mental
happiness (pīti or “preethi“) arises in the mind. This is the jhānic factor of pīti, and it
suppresses the hindrance of ill will (vyāpāda). This happiness is felt mainly on the face.
§ The body becomes light due to physical happiness (sukha). This jhānic factor counters the
hindrance of restlessness and worry (uddhacca kukkucca).
§ Thus the mind now becomes totally absorbed in the thought object, and one has one-
pointedness (ekgaggata). This is the primary jhānic factor in all rupaloka jhānic states and the
essence of concentration (samādhi). This one-pointedness temporarily inhibits sensual desire
(kamachanda).
When all five jhānic factors are present, the five hindrances are temporarily suppressed, and one is in
the first jhānic state.
6. The higher jhānas are attained by successively eliminating the grosser jhāna factors and by
refining the subtler jhāna factors through sustained concentration.
§ Thus in the Abhidhamma it is stated that there are five jhānic states, where the last four are
attained by the elimination of a jhāna factor at each stage; thus in that method, the second jhāna
is attained by removing vitakka. But in the suttas, the Buddha expounds the jhānas as fourfold,
where both vitakka and vicara are removed to get to the second jhāna. Therefore the difference
comes in at the second jhāna.
§ For someone cultivating jhāna, this is not of any practical concern. In practice, it is not easy to
distinguish between two steps of removing vittakka, vicara; they seem to go away together.
That is probably why the Buddha just combine them into one jhāna in the suttas.
Possible Perils of Mundane Jhānas
First of all, the anariya (mundane) jhānas are not stable as Ariya jhānas. A yogi can be taken out of
the jhāna by the anusaya (temptations) triggered by an external stimulus, for example seeing an
attractive woman or hearing a seductive voice; see, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent
Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“.
§ There is this story about a yogi who was travelling by air with abhiññā powers and saw a
flower in the shape of a woman (called “nārilathā”) and lost the jhānic state and came down;
there is another such story where the yogi heard the singing of a woman and had to face the
same fate.
§ In contrast, when someone gets into an Ariya jhāna, that jhāna cannot be broken by any such
influence even though the yogi may see or hear such external stimuli; see, “Power of the
Human Mind - Ariya Jhānas“, and “11. Magga Phala and Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of
Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ Thus even though the yogi may have not removed some āsavas, the anusaya are PREVENTED
from arising in an Ariya jhāna; this is because the object of concentration (arammana) in an
Ariya jhāna is not a mundane object, but Nibbāna.
§ June 8, 2018: The critical differences between Ariya and anariya jhāna discussed in
“Pathama Mettā Sutta“.
1. There are many people even today, who can get into these mundane jhānas. But it is not a good
idea to attain such mundane jhānas at or above the fifth jhāna.
§ This is because, if someone dies while in such an arūpa jhānic state, he/she will be born in the
arūpa loka: it is not possible to attain the Sotāpanna stage in the arūpa loka because the eye
and ear faculties are not present (so one could not learn Dhamma), and thus cannot become a
Sotāpanna. Thus one would spend a very long time there, and has to start all over when one
returns to the human world. Once in the human world, it is possible that one could accumulate
bad kamma vipāka and be destined to the apāyas.
§ Thus it is better to make the effort to become a Sotāpanna, rather than seeking any jhāna. A
Sotāpanna will never be born in the apāyas (lowest four realms).
2. There is yet another danger in attaining these mundane jhānas. Even before the jhānas, one could
start seeing objects of one’s liking (such as religious figures of any religion, religious symbols,
colorful lights, etc).
§ Thus many people tend to believe that they have attained some of sort of advancement in
meditation or in their belief system; some Buddhists may believe they have attained Nibbāna or
something close to it. It could be dangerous to play with such illusions. When such lights or
other images appear, one should completely ignore them. I used to see them too, but luckily
I found my teachers before getting heavily involved with these illusions.
3. It is said that in some rare instances, lowly spirits try to convince meditators that they are devas or
brahmas (beings in the realms higher than the human realm). It is dangerous to get involved with
them too. It is possible that some of the horror stories we hear from time to time about people killing
their own families were committed under such influences.
Extrasensory Perceptions and Powers (Abhiññā)
1. When one attains and perfects the fourth jhāna, one could start developing several extra sensory
perceptions and powers, which could take considerable effort. No reports are available on anyone
with ALL these abilities at the present time. However, when one attains the Arahant stage, certain
extra sensory powers can be attained if cultivated, including the last one on the following list, the
ability to “see” the past lives:
§ Psychokinesis (iddhividha) or various manifestations of the “power of will”.
§ Clairaudience (dibbasota), the faculty of perceiving sounds even at long distances, far beyond
the range of ordinary auditory faculties.
§ Clairvoyance (dibbacakkhu), which enables one to see far events as well as heavenly worlds
(i.e., other beings that are not visible to normal human eye).
§ Telepathy (cetopariya ñāna), which enables one to comprehend the general state as well as the
functioning of another’s mind.
§ Ability to recollect one’s own past lives (pubbenivasanussatinana).
2. It is possible for a yogi to develop the abhiññā to the extent that he/she can see past lives through
half of a Mahā Kalpa (which can be taken to be roughly 15 billion years). The ancient yogis with
such power saw that the Mahā Brahma has been there all through that time period. Therefore, they
came to the wrong conclusion that the Mahā Brahma was the one who created the world at that time
in the past.
§ Those yogis who are born in the asanna realm spend 500 Mahā Kalpas there like a lifeless log
(no thinking, that is what asanna means). When they exhaust that lifetime, they normally are
reborn in the human realm, and because of this past “gathi” to cultivate jhānas, they may again
develop abhiññā powers. Now they look back at past lives, but do not see any because they can
look back only half of a Mahā Kalpa, which is only a thousandth of the duration of the past life.
Thus, they also conclude erroneously that they are “new” beings, who did not have any past
lives.
§ The Buddha, upon his Enlightenment, could see thousands of Mahā Kalpas in the blink of eye.
This is why he said there is no discernible beginning to life.
§ An Arahant with abhiññā powers can see back through numerous Mahā Kalpas since Ariya
jhānas are much more powerful.
3. Further details can be found in:
§ “The Manuals of Dhamma”, by Ven. Ledi Sayadaw (2006), p. 105.
§ “Abhidhammattha Sangaha – Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma” by Bhikkhu Bodhi
(1999), p. 344.
4. These kinds of direct knowledge are all mundane and are dependent on the mastery of the fourth
jhāna and focusing attention on these tasks. The Buddha discouraged bhikkhus from pursuing these
mundane powers, and also prohibited bhikkhus from public display of such powers, calling them
“childish”. That is because all these powers are temporary. Since one has not removed avijjā
(ignorance) and has only suppressed greed (lobha) and hate or ill will (dosa), they can resurface any
time and remove all those achievements.
§ One good example from the Buddha’s time was Devadatta, who was a brother of princess
Yasodhara. Devadatta became a monk and developed the mundane jhānas and attained those
direct knowledges described above. He could perform many “miracles”, and one time he
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Buddha Dhamma 67
appeared in the bedroom of Prince Ajasattu to impress him. But when Devadatta went against
the Buddha and at one time injured the Buddha, he lost all his mundane powers and ended up in
the lowest realm (avici niraya) because of those offenses.
By now one should be able to get a sense of the potential of the mind. With even these mundane
jhānas, a human can access the higher realms of existence and also attain super normal powers, but
these mundane jhānas are at a much lower level than Ariya jhānas.
Next, “Power of the Human Mind - Ariya Jhānas“, ……….
2.9.4 Power of the Human Mind – Ariya Jhānas
1. We saw in the previous post that Anariya jhānas are attained via focusing the mind on ANY
thought object (vitakka), whether it is breath, a kasina object, or any other religious symbol of any
religion, and then keeping the mind there (vicara or sustained application).
2. Whereas the Anariya or mundane jhānas are attained by SUPPRESSING the five hindrances via
concentrating on mundane objects (breath, a kasina object, etc) , Ariya jhānas are attained via using
Nibbāna as the arammana (thought object); actually, Nibbāna is not “an object” in this world, so
what is meant here is to recall some “cooling down” that one has experienced.
§ One can start “cooling down” first by living a moral life and by staying away from dasa
akusala; see, “Living Dhamma”.
§ When one comprehends the Three Characteristics (Tilakkhaṇa) of anicca, dukkha, anatta at
least to some extent, there is definitely more permanent “cooling down” over time. One can
look back and notice such a “cooling down”. For example, one may not “flare up” at the
slightest provocation as one used to, or one may have lost cravings to some extent, etc. That is
what needs to be recalled while cultivating Ariya jahna; see #4 below for the kammatthana.
3. Thus the key is to first experience some “cooling down” by comprehending the Three
Characteristics of “this world” of 31 realms. One examines the real life situations and understands
that no lasting happiness is possible, either in this life or anywhere in these 31 realms; see. “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“, and “Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta so Important?“. This gives rise to nirāmisa sukha (see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is
Nirāmisa Sukha?“) of Nibbāna, i.e., some sort of a “cooling down”, over time. How long it takes to
experience some “cooling down” will depend on the person.
4. When one has experienced some “cooling down” that one can recall, then one can use it in a
kammatthana to cultivate jhāna. This procedure is more effective for those who have attained the
Sotāpanna stage. One can sit in a quiet place and recite the following kammatthana:
§ “Ethan santhan ethan paneethan, sabba saṅkhāra samatho, Sabbhupathi patinissaggo,
tanhkkhayo, virago, nirodho, Nibbanan ti“, which means, “It is the only peace, the only
happiness: prevent saṅkhāra from arising (via) eliminating taṇhā and excess greed, and thus
stopping the arising of defilements, which is Nibbāna“. This needs to be done while recalling
an instance of one’s own “cooling down”; see #3 above.
§ However, the above procedure is not much effective unless one has at least some understanding
of anicca, dukkha, anatta and has experienced some “cooling down”; it can be used to quickly
enter a jhāna that had been cultivated.
5. Thus the difference between the mundane and Ariya versions of samatha meditation is the
meditation object, and this is the reason that asanna jhānas are avoided in the Ariya meditation. In
the former, one can focus on ANY object; in the latter one focuses on Nibbāna. Thus, vitakka, vicara
for Anariya samatha meditation becomes savitakka, savicara, emphasizing the focus on
Nibbāna, with the prefix “sa“.
§ “Ethan santhan ethan paneethan, …….” cannot be used just as a chanting without
understanding what is meant by heart. Thus the chant (one does not chant out loud; one could
just say it in the mind to oneself or say it very quietly meaningfully) will become more and
more effective as one starts feeling the nirāmisa sukha at least to a certain extent. One could
also start with any Anariya samatha meditation (the breath meditation is easy to do), and once
starts feeling the calmness and early stages of nirāmisa sukha, one could permanently switch
over to the Ariya version, by contemplating on anicca, dukkha, anatta and recalling one’s own
“cooling down”.
6. Another thing to remember is that nirāmisa sukha has no equivalent sensation in any type of amisa
sukha or sense pleasures that are available with the five physical senses. It is more like a relief
sensation. When one has a headache and it goes away, one feels a relief, a calmness, a peace of mind.
The nirāmisa sukha is something like that. The more nirāmisa sukha one feels one becomes calm
inwardly AND outwardly.
§ When one gets into jhānas, jhānic pleasure can be felt in the body.
§ In the post, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“, I have explained how
a Sotāpanna automatically removes the five types of citta that are responsible for rebirth in the
apāyas (the lowest four realms). In that discussion, it was also shown how vicikicchā is
responsible for such bad kamma, and how contemplation on Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha,
anatta) can remove vicikicchā, and also four other greed-rooted cittas that arise because of the
wrong views.
7. Thus as one contemplates on anicca, dukkha, anatta, one automatically starts reducing, not just
suppressing the hindrances. By the time one attains the Sotāpanna stage, these five hindrances are
reduced to a level that is sufficient to attain the first Ariya jhāna with the jhāna factors of savitakka,
savicara, pīti, sukha, ekaggata fairly easily.
§ As pointed out above, the hindrance of vicikicchā is removed at the Sotāpanna stage. The other
four hindrances are removed in stages as one moves to higher Nibbānic states.
§ For example, as one progresses from the Sotāpanna stage to higher Nibbānic states, all jhānic
factors are automatically fulfilled: The two hindrances of kamachanda and vyāpāda were
reduced to kamaraga and paṭigha levels at the Sotāpanna stage. Kamaraga and paṭigha are
reduced further at the Sakadāgāmī stage, are removed at the Anāgāmī stage. Thus an Anāgāmī
is left with rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga, and thus one has only attachment for rūpa loka and
arūpa loka.
§ On the other hand, the hindrance of thina middha is easily overcome by savitakka, i.e., when
the mind is focused on Nibbāna (anicca, dukkha, anatta). Thus any sleepiness or lethargic
feeling cannot survive and one feels energetic. A Sotāpanna is at the entry level of
comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta, and the understanding gets progressively better as one
moves to higher stages and becomes complete only at the Arahant stage.
§ The hindrance of Uddacca also decreases by stages and is completely removed only at the
Arahant stage.
§ Thus we can see that even without cultivating jhānas, an Arahant automatically removes all
five hindrances. As one moves to higher stages of Nibbāna, it should become easier to attain
jhānas.
8. In summary, Ariya jhānas are permanent in nature compared to Anariya jhānas. Thus a Sotāpanna
will be able to easily get to the first Ariya jhāna in any of the future lives, because some of the five
hindrances have been permanently reduced, and vicikicchā permanently removed. Even in a noisy
environment, Ariya jhānas (especially second or higher) can be summoned at will.
§ The clearest distinction of an Ariya jhāna is that once in the jhāna, the jhāna cannot be
interrupted by anusaya or a lustful or a hateful thought. Even if one forcefully tries to think
about such a thought, it does not “stick”; the mind rejects it; see, “11. Magga Phala and Ariya
Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ One can contemplate Dhamma concepts (savitakka, savicara) while in a jhāna. Only vitakka
and vicara are reduced at the first Ariya jhāna, and completely eliminated at higher jhānas.
Doing insight meditation (contemplating on anicca, dukkha, anatta or any Dhamma concept)
can be done with a clear, bright mind.
§ All jhānas are mundane in the sense that they provide the jhānic experience in the rupaloka and
arupaloka, which still belong to the 31 realms of existence. The Nibbānic bliss is the ultimate
bliss.
§ It is said that the nirodha sammapatti that can be attained by an Arahant is incomparably better
compared to any jhāna. It is said that an Arahant can enjoy the sensation of Nibbānic bliss
continually for up to seven days in nirodha sammapatti.
§ Thus ultimately what is most important is the purification of one’s own mind; see, “The
Importance of Purifying the Mind“.
9. One gets to the first Ariya jhāna by removing (ucceda pahāna) kama raga, whereas one can get to
the first anariya jhāna by suppressing (vikkhambana pahāna) kāma rāga. Therefore, one will be an
Anāgāmī by the time one gets to the first Ariya jhāna.
§This is discussed in detail and evidence from the Tipiṭaka provided in the post: “Mundane
versus Supramundane Jhāna“.
§ Even some followers of Waharaka Thero in Sri Lanka do not seem to understand this point.
However, Waharaka Thero has clearly explained this in the following short desanā (in Sinhala):
“WebLink: Ariya and Anariya Jhāna (Audio)“.
More information with references to suttās at: “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
2.9.5 Are There Procedures for Attaining Magga Phala, Jhāna and
Abhiññā?
1. Learning Dhamma (or following the Path) is very different from learning mundane subjects like
history, economics, or even science and mathematics.
§ Ariya jhāna and subsequent abhiññā powers are realized as “by products” after one attains the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ Even attaining magga phala does not have set procedures, other than following the Eightfold
Path. However, kammattana based on one’s personality can be helpful.
§ The most important thing is to cleanse one’s mind. Things just become clear with a purified
mind.
2. There is an excellent example described in the Tipiṭaka. There were two bhikkhus at the time of the
Buddha called Mahapanthaka and Culapanthaka. They were brothers and Ven. Mahapantaka was the
elder. Ven. Mahapanthaka had been trying to teach a certain verse (gāta) to Ven. Culapanthaka for
six months, but Ven. Culapanthaka was unable to memorize it.
§ Ven. Mahapanthaka got frustrated and asked Ven. Culapanthaka to disrobe and he left crying.
The Buddha saw this incident and realized that Ven. Culapanthaka had very unique hidden
capabilities.
§ He gave proper instructions to Ven. Culapanthaka, and Ven. Culapanthaka was able to attain
not only the Arahantship but also attain vast super-normal (abhiññā) powers within the same
day. The trick for Ven. Culapanthaka was to go beyond a certain sticking point that had been
blocking his mind.
§ He recited not one but 500 gāta that day. There are many reports of his abhiññā powers. One
time he made 999 copies of himself and they were all engaged in various activities at the
temple.
§ The point is that none of that was gained via “book knowledge”. Once the breakthrough came
with the instructions from the Buddha, the rest of it came gushing through immediately.
§ No one taught him how to memorize all those 500 verses or how to cultivate abhiññā
powers. A decent version of this story can be found at WebLink: Dhammapada Verse 25 –
Culapanthaka Vatthu.
3. Another example is how Ven. Ānanda attained the Arahanthood and many abhiññā powers
overnight. Three months after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha, the first Buddhist Council
(Sangayana) was set to take place, and the day before that Ven. Ānanda had not attained the
Arahantship. He had been a Sotāpanna while the Buddha was alive.
§ Since only “sivpilisimbiya” Arahants (those with patisambhida ñāṇa [‘analytical knowledge’ or
‘discrimination’]) were allowed to attend the Sangayana, Ven. Ānanda was under pressure to
attain the Arahanthood. Despite his efforts, he had not attained the Arahantood the night
before, and he decided to lie down to take a rest. As he was getting into bed while thinking
about a Dhamma concept, he attained the Arahantship while not in any of the four postures
(was not on the bed yet, but was off the ground).
§ Simultaneous with that he acquired many abhiññā powers too. The next day, when he went to
the Sangayana hall, everyone was inside. He stood by the door and announced that he had
attained the Arahantship and requested the door to be opened. One of the Arahant asked Ven.
Ānanda to remove doubts of everyone present about his attainment.
§ So, Ven. Ānanda went inside through the closed door, traveled through air and took his seat.
Then it was clear to everyone that he had not only attained the Arahantship, but also had
cultivated abhiññā powers overnight; see, “WebLink: Ānanda -The Guardian of the Dhamma“.
4. Waharaka Thero has given the following simile to understand what happens when one attains the
Sotāpanna stage, and WHY it takes only a fraction of second.
§ Suppose person X is running back and forth past a sign that has written on it some information
in small letters. It is not possible to read the sign while running, no matter how many times you
run past it.
§ But suppose X stops for a few seconds to read the sign, then resumes running back and forth
again. Now that he has read the message that is on the post, he KNOWS what is written on the
post, even though he again cannot read it while running.
§ In the same way, it takes only a fraction of a second to the mind to grasp the true nature of this
world (anicca, dukkha, anatta) when the mind is calm AND if one has learned enough
background material (in the simile, he must know the language the sign was written in).
§ While one is gathering this supporting material one is a Sotāpanna Anugami. Then the
Sotāpanna phala moment can come at any time. It comes and goes even without one realizing
it. Only weeks or months later, one will start realizing the permanent change in oneself.
5. This is why I said in #1 above, that there are no set procedures for making progress on the Path or
developing abhiññā powers (of course anariya techniques are different). As one makes progress, one
will AUTOMATICALLY receive the results based on one’s progress.
§ One will automatically attain magga phala.
§ One may also attain Ariya jhānic states subsequently, if one had cultivated them in recent
previous lives. For others, it may take some time to cultivate Ariya jhāna. As I described in a
previous post, jhāna are very different from magga phala and it may not be easy to verify
whether one has attained Ariya or anariya jhāna; see, “Difference Between Jhāna and Stages of
Nibbāna“.
§ While certain meditation techniques COULD be helpful, the two main factors are kusala sīla
(moral living) and comprehending the real nature of this world, i.e., Tilakkhaṇa.
6. Our goal should be to eliminate future suffering by cultivating wisdom (paññā), and thereby
getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi.
§ Of course, learning correct Dhamma is a joyful experience which can motivate one to learn
further and thereby help comprehending the true message of the Buddha.
§ The key is to not confuse “learning” with just “memorization”. One needs to get the key idea or
saññā of a given concept. When one gets the saññā of a concept, one will never lose it: “What
is Saññā (Perception)?“.
7. This website with hundreds of posts could discourage people, thinking that one needs to memorize
all these different things to learn Dhamma.
§ It is not necessary to MEMORIZE ANYTHING. Most of the material at the website is for
REFERENCE. If one forgets some details about a concept it is easy to use the menu system,
“Search” button on the top right, or the Pure Dhamma – Sitemap to locate relevant posts.
§ However, listening to desanā or reading Dhamma (and then grasping concepts, not
memorizing) is an essential part of learning (grasping concepts).
§ Getting into jhānas or attaining magga phala do not have set procedures. They will
AUTOMATICALLY be realized as one follows the Path and one’s wisdom grows.
§ The key is to stay away from dasa akusala, live a moral life, and comprehend the key message
embedded in anicca, dukkha, anatta by learning Dhamma and contemplating.
§ By the way, there is a connection between dasa akusala and anatta as we discussed last week;
see, “Dasa Akusala and Anatta – The Critical Link“. So, anicca, dukkha, anatta are related to
dasa akusala.
8. Memory and wisdom are two different things, even though somewhat related. In order to
comprehend the message of the Buddha, one should cultivate wisdom (paññā) instead of memorizing
verses. Let us take a simple example to explain this.
§ A child can learn addition by just memorizing. Then he/she would be able to give the right
answer to the addition of two numbers that has been memorized, but will not be able to add two
randomly chosen numbers.
§ However, if the child is taught HOW TO add two numbers, using a technique like using the
fingers in the hand to represent numbers. it will be possible to “see” WHY two plus three equal
to five. Then the child will be able to add any two numbers.
§ Once that is grasped, it would easy for the child to then learn subtraction, multiplication, and
division.
§ However, it will be an impossible task to MEMORIZE the addition, subtraction, multiplication,
and division of ANY two numbers.
9. There is a basic difference between “real learning” (grasping concepts) and memorization
(just blindly following rules/instructions).
§ This is a concept that is hard to grasp for many these days, because we are so much used to
“book learning”. There are many people who can repeat certain tasks mechanically without
even bothering to think through. And then when the situation changes somewhat they do not
know how to handle the “new situation”.
10. The message of the Buddha is unique. It goes far beyond moral living. Some people think that by
living a moral life one would be able to get an afterlife in heaven forever.
§ On the other end of the spectrum, another set of people believe that killing those who are
unfaithful to their God can also lead to a heavenly life, which should be beyond belief for any
reasonable person.
§ However, if a mind is contaminated from the early age, such dangerous ideas sink into the mind
and is very hard to change.
§ Both those extremes are faith based.
§ Hopefully, one would be able to see that there is a key element of reasoning, not faith, involved
in Buddha Dhamma. It can be grasped by a reasonably moral person. It can be followed to a
very deep level if desired.
11. Buddha Dhamma cannot be learnt by books or with this website. But they can help by providing
(correct) information; if it is incorrect information, then it would be just a waste of time.
§ Since Buddha Dhamma is really different from any other religion or philosophy, one first needs
to get that basic information from someone who really knows the fundamentals (kamma/vipāka,
dasa akusala, paṭicca samuppāda, etc) and then the deeper aspects like anicca, dukkha, anatta
once the basics are absorbed.
§ It is not possible to even absorb the fundamentals, unless one is already living a moral life. It
may sound hard to believe, but a defiled mind CANNOT absorb Buddha Dhamma.
§ A defiled mind is like a dirty cloth, which cannot be made colorful by soaking in a dye.
The cloth needs to be cleaned in order to absorb the dye and to become bright.
§ Therefore, the first step is to stay away from the worst of the dasa akusala, which are also
called “panca dushcharitha” or “five immoral qualities”: killing, stealing, sexual misconduct,
lying, and alcoholism/drug use.
12. What is discussed in the Kalama Sutta is this very first step: Understanding that what one does
not like to be done to oneself, another wouldn’t like either. No one likes to be hurt and to put to
misery. Any normal human should be able to comprehend that simple concept.
§ That step needs to happen before one starts on the five precepts or moral conduct (panca sīla)
which are deeper; see “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them“.
§ Only then one can start comprehending the deeper concepts like anicca, dukkha, anatta, the
Four Noble Truths, and start on the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “What is Unique in Buddha
Dhamma?“.
§ The ability to understand deeper concepts gets easier as one purifies one’s mind.
13. Even though this website will be a useful resource, one should not start memorizing key concepts.
First of all, it is not possible to do that. There is so much material that it is impossible to remember
everything. But it is essential to read various aspects and try to “fill in gaps” in the “big picture”.
§ Of course, I myself do not remember all the details. But I do know where to refer to get any
needed information. It is all in the Tipiṭaka, and the late Waharaka Thero has clarified the key
terms for us, so that we can find our own way gradually.
§ It becomes easier to analyze a given concept as one progresses. The more one grasps about a
concept (not merely memorize the wording), the meanings (and how to use them in other
situations) start to come flowing through.
§ At some point, when one starts comprehending key concepts, one will be able to see
connections among different aspects and start seeing the big picture or to make that big picture
even more clear. That is when a Sotāpanna Anugami becomes a Sotāpanna.
More information with references to suttās at: “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
1. Even some Buddhists are skeptical that merits can be “transferred” to other beings: It does not
appear to be “scientific”. However, Buddha Dhamma is far ahead of science, and this is another
example. Even though the vocabulary is different, mechanisms of “energy transfer” (mental energy)
are also explained in Dhamma.
§ It is possible to transfer the merits of a good deed, and also many other versions of “mental
energy”.
§ The basic idea can be thought of as follows. Suppose one has a lighted oil lamp, and many
others have oil lamps that they are unable to light. Wouldn’t it be better to let others use one’s
lamp’s flame to light their lamps?
§ Of course, it is not possible to “create” many oil lamps starting with one. But it is possible to
make thousand other lamps by sharing the flame of one oil lamp. In the same way, the receiving
person needs to have a essential ingredients to reap the benefits, as explained below. But since
all those lamps will be useless without a way to light them, the person providing the light is
doing an excellent service.
§ One “giving merits” is doing pattidāna or “conditions” for good kamma bīja (or beeja) to
germinate. The receiver must have good kamma beeja or “root causes” and receive those
pattidāna willingly, which is called “puñña anumodanā” which rhymes as “puññānumodana“.
[pattidāna :[nt.] transference of merit or share.]
2. Anumodana means the receiving mind is becoming joyful with the merits it received (“anu” +
“odanā”, which rhymes as “anumodanā”). The giver is giving (“dāna”) the “paccayā” or the
auxiliary causes. (The common word is “pratyaya” but that is the incorrect Sanskrit word; the correct
Pāli word is paccayā). It is paccayā that represents “pati” in “pattidāna” (pronounced,
“paththidāna“).
§ Other than in direct giving (see below), the giver cannot make the receiving party “receive what
is intended” unless the person receiving has a mindset that is attuned to receiving.
§ It is the receiving person that is doing the “puñña anumodanā”, i.e., gladly receiving the
pattidāna of the giver and becoming joyful with the merits received. That is also called
“pattānumodanā”. [pattānumodanā :[f.] transference of merit.]
3. Giving and receiving can be done in many ways:
§ The direct way of giving/receiving is when one gives money or something material. It is
deducted from the giver’s ledger and is added to the receiver’s: Transfer is complete.
§ When a teacher teaches a classroom full of kids, he/she is giving instructions the same way to
all the kids. But how much a particular kid “receives” or comprehends depends on that specific
kid’s ability to receive.
§ A radio/television station is broadcasting a program. But the reception of the program by a
radio/TV depends on the quality of that receiving device. Furthermore, it has been “tuned” to
the correct station.
§ This transfer can happen instantaneously or with a time lag, because that mental energy is in the
“nāma loka” and is accessible at any time; see, “Memory, Brain, Mind, Nama Loka, Kamma
Bhava, Kamma Vipāka,” “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis”, and “Our Two Worlds:
Material and Immaterial.”
4. Therefore, only in “direct giving,” the amount received is the same as given. The amount received
in the other other two “indirect giving” methods depends on the receiver. A similar mechanism is at
work when one does a good deed and “transfers merits” to another person who may be far away.
§ All intentions have kammic energy. You may remember that the Buddha said, “Cetanā ahaṃ
bhikkave kammaṃ vadāmi,” or “Bhikkhus, I say that intention is kamma”. And kamma is the
vital potential energy for everything in this world. [Cetanāhaṃ, bhikkhave, kammaṃ
vadāmi. Cetayitvā kammaṃ karoti— kāyena vācāya manasā. AN 63. Nibbedhikasutta]
§ People very much underestimate the power of the human mind. Those who have experienced at
least anariya jhānas can sense at least a little bit about the power of the mind; see, “Power of the
Human Mind – Introduction” and the two follow-up posts.
§ Direct giving is “dāna“; indirect giving is “pattidāna“. These are two of the ten meritorious
deeds (puñña kamma); see, “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā.”
5. One such mechanism is the anantara-samanantara paccayā; see “Anantara and Samanantara
Paccaya.” This is a universal law governing how kamma and kamma vipāka operate (kamma niyama).
Many people pronounce “niyama” as “niyaama,” but “niyama” is the Pāli or Sinhala word for
“principle.”
§ Thus kamma niyama are the universal laws of kamma (like the law of gravitation).
6. Suppose one is “transferring merits” by sincerely saying that “May so and so receive merits from
this good deed that I have done.” One could do metta bhāvanā by saying, “May all beings be free
from the suffering in the apāyas” or some version of it. In bothe cases, one is BROADCASTING
one’s intention.
§ However, just because one is doing such a “giving”, the intended recipient may not receive the
benefits UNLESS the receipient has a matching mindset. It is just like the case of a radio/TV,
where the receiving device need to be set to the “right frequency” to receive the signal.
§ That is explained in the post, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya.” Don’t be discouraged by
those Pāli words. Sometimes, as in the case of paṭicca samuppāda, it is best to use the Pāli
words and to understand the meaning of them.
7. Transfer of merits is efficient when the giver and the receiver are together, and each is aware of the
other’s intention. For example, in Asian countries, it is customary to transfer merits to deceased
relatives. Almsgiving to the Saṅgha and pattidāna offered to the deceased relative belong to this
category.
§ The deceased party can receive merits if it is in a state where it can receive such merits, for
example, if it is in a gandhabba state.
§ But if the deceased is reborn an animal or human, then it cannot receive full benefits, even
though it may benefit to some extent.
8. It is possible to “give Dhamma” or to “give kusala” too. The Buddha said, “sabba dānan Dhamma
dānan jināti” or, “from all kinds of giving, Dhamma giving is the most meritorious.”
§ When the Buddha gave a discourse, those who were listening “received” Dhamma or kusala in
varying degrees. Some became Arahants, some attained the Sotāpanna stage, etc during the
discourse itself. But others did not achieve any stage but possibly still accumulated merits of
kusala. Kusala (“ku” or “kunu” or “dirty”+”sala” or “remove”, and thus shedding defiled
thoughts from the mind). That means gaining wisdom, non-greed, non-hate AND discarding
greed, hate, and delusion.
§ During such a discourse, one mainly cultivate wisdom. That, in turn, results in discarding greed
and hate.
9. How much merits a given person receives depends on the state of mind of that person. It also
depends on the intellectual level of that person. But it is not possible to quantify the intellectual level
using modern standards of “book knowledge.” It is not directly related to one’s formal education. It is
easier to give some examples.
§ Ven. Ānanda was highly literate, a former prince, and had a fantastic memory power. He had
the whole sutta pitaka in his memory. And he was with the Buddha for many years but attained
the Arahanthood only after the Parinibbāna (passing away) of the Buddha.
§ Suneetha was of low-caste and was carrying buckets of feces when the Buddha met him. The
Buddha with his supernormal powers saw that Suneetha was capable of comprehending
Dhamma and asked Suneetha to become a bhikkhu. Ven. Suneetha became an Arahant within
seven days.
10. A given person who may be receptive to “receiving Dhamma” when his mind is in a calm state.
But the same person may not comprehend anything when his mind is excited, or distracted. This is
the same as saying that the five hindrances are active; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – Five
Hindrances“. Therefore, it is IMPORTANT to have a correct mindset when learning Dhamma,
whether by listening or reading.
§ Therefore, try to read these posts at quiet times, when the mind is receptive, and NOT during
the brief breaks at work when the mind is occupied or agitated.
§ In Asian countries, that is a significant reason for going to the temple. At the temple, people
make offering of flowers to the Buddha or the Bodhi tree. Such activities get the mind into a
calm, peaceful state suitable for listening to a Dhamma discourse afterwards; see, “Buddhist
Chanting” and “Tisarana Vandana and Its Effects on One’s Gathi“.
11. Therefore, both anantara and samanantara must are optimized to make all these activities
efficient.
§ Of course if one is not learning the true Dhamma, anantara is not right, and one is wasting
one’s time.
§ On the other hand, even with an excellent Dhamma delivery, the receiver's mind needs to be
receptive to get full benefits. In other words, samanantara must be good too.
12. The following example may help in clarifying this concept: Having “good kamma beeja” is like
having “good seeds.” Suppose person X has potent seeds but does not have water and nutrients for
those seeds to germinate and grow. Now, if person Y can provide X with water and nutrients, X can
plant those seeds and get them to germinate and grow.
§ Like that, some beings that have “good kamma seeds,” but do not have the necessary conditions
for them to bring the corresponding good kamma vipāka. When one is doing pattidāna, that is
like donating water and nutrients in that simile (example).
13. A seed is the anantara or the cause (kamma beeja), and the receiving party must have that.
However, unless that field is moist, has nutrients, and has exposure to sunlight, the seed cannot grow,
i.e., the samanantara (or suitable conditions) must be there too.
§ Therefore, the receiver can accept those conditions from the giver, and get those existing good
kamma beeja to bring their good vipāka.
§ It is only when both annanatara and samanatara are optimized and matched that full benefits
result. i.e., optimum transfer takes place. For those whose are familiar with the “resonance
effect” in physics, it is quite similar to that. Only when the energy of photon matches an energy
gap of an atom that the absorption of that photon by the atom is optimum.
14. There is a type of “anumodanā” that happens in day-to-day life too. Suppose X starts a project to
feed the hungry. Many poor people benefit from it. When Y sees that Y may become joyful seeing
the hungry getting fed, and may thank X for doing it. This joy of heart, even if Y did not contribute,
counts as “merits”; it becomes a good kamma vipāka for Y. That does not take any merits away from
X.
§ It is not possible for something to come out of nothing. So, where do those kinds of benefits
come from? It comes from the mental energy of Y, who became joyful upon seeing the kind
act. This is part of the mental energy (javana) that a human possesses; see, “Power of the
Human Mind.”
§ That is true of immoral acts too. Suppose X is beating up Y. Person Z may be glad to see that
and may encourage X to beat up Y. Now, suppose Y dies as a result of the beating. Then not
only X, but Z also gets bad kamma vipāka for that immoral act.
§ In our societies also, the same principle applies. If the police investigating the death of Y has
evidence that Z also encouraged the killing, then Z as well as X, could be prosecuted.
§ Thus our feelings (good or bad) play an important role in accumulating good and bad kamma
vipāka.
Most people believe that the First Noble Truth just says there is suffering. Some also think that it is
possible to “remove” this existing suffering IN THIS LIFE by following extensive and elaborate
meditation techniques.
1. The Buddha said, “My Dhamma has not been known in this world. It is something people have
never heard of previously”. So we should carefully examine to see what is really new about the
suffering that he talked about.
§ What is new about knowing that there is suffering around us? Everybody knows that there is
suffering with old age, diseases, poverty, etc.
§ And it is possible to REMOVE existing suffering by doing meditation? For example, if one has
come down with a disease, can one overcome that by doing meditation? If someone is getting
old and is feeling the pains and aches of old age, can that be PERMANENTLY removed by
doing meditation? Even though some issues can be handled due to special reasons, in most
cases we CANNOT change such EFFECTS or end results.
2. Let us discuss these two points one at a time.
3. Let us first see whether it is possible to REMOVE the existing suffering.
§ For example, if someone has aches and pains due to old age, it is not possible to get rid of them
other than to use medications or therapy to lessen the pain and manage it. If someone gets
cancer, it is normally not possible to get rid of it by meditation. It may be handled by
medication. Even the Buddha had pains and aches due to old age, and had a severe stomach
ache at the end.
§ In the context of that last sentence, It must be noted that there are two types of vedanā
(feelings): those due to kamma vipāka and those due to saṅkhāra (attachment to sensual
pleasures), and an Arahant gets rid of only the second kind until the Parinibbāna (death); see,
“Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
§ In fact, it may not even be possible to do meditation under any of such conditions. Even
someone who has developed jhānas, may not be able to get into jhānas if the pains are too
distracting.
§ The purpose behind Buddhist meditation is to contemplate on the true nature of the world and
find the CAUSES of such suffering, so that those causes can be stopped and FUTURE suffering
can be stopped.
§ It is true that one can get a relief from day-to-day stresses by doing different kinds of
meditation. And it is good to do them. But such practices were there even before the Buddha.
There was no need for a Buddha to reveal to the world that one could get some “calming down”
by doing breath meditation or kasina meditation.
§ In a way, such “samatha” meditations are comparable to taking an aspirin for a headache. One
can get relief in the short term but it is temporary. But the problem that the Buddha addressed
involved a much longer time scale, and will lead to a nirāmisa sukha that is permanent.
4. So, what was the “never heard truth about suffering” that the Buddha revealed to the world? In
short it is the “suffering that is hidden in sense pleasures; the suffering that WILL ARISE in future
lives”.
§ Let us take an example to get a simple version of this “new idea”.
§ When a fish bites the bait, it does not see the suffering hidden in that action. Looking from the
ground we can see the whole picture and we know what is going to happen to the fish if it bites
the bait. But the fish is unable to see that whole picture, and thus does not see the hidden
suffering. It only sees a delicious bit of food.
§ In the same way, if we do not know about the wider world of 31 realms (with the suffering-
laden four lowest realms), and that we have gone through unimaginable suffering in those
realms in the past, we only focus on what is easily accessible to our six senses.
§ In order to really comprehend suffering through repeated rebirths, one needs to comprehend
that most suffering is encountered in the 4 lowest realms (apāyas); see, “The Grand Unified
Theory of Dhamma“.
§ Thus, stopping suffering requires one to first stop the causes for rebirths in the apāyas by
attaining the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna; see, “Nibbāna in the Big Picture“.
5. Seeing this hidden suffering is indeed difficult. It is not possible to convey the whole message in
one essay, but I will try to get across the main idea. One really needs to spend some time thinking
through these issues. When the Buddha attained the Buddhahood, it said that he was worried whether
he could convey this deep ideas to most people.
§ Everything happens due to one or (usually) many causes. The famous Third Law of motion in
physics says that every action has a reaction; and the First Law says that an object will not
change its status unless a force acts on it. It is easy to see these “cause and effect” principles at
work in mechanical objects. If something needs to be moved, it needs to be pushed or pulled. If
a stone is thrown up, it must come down if there is gravity pulling it down.
§ We seek pleasures that are highly visible. But if we gain such pleasures with immoral acts, the
consequences of such immoral acts are not apparent. We can see a stone thrown up coming
down, but we cannot see any bad consequences to the drug dealer who seems to be enjoying
life.
6. The main problem in clearly seeing the “cause and effect of mind actions” is that the results of
those actions have a time delay and that time delay itself is not predictable. In contrast, it is easy to
predict what is going to happen with material things (moving an object, a vehicle, a rocket, etc). The
success of physical sciences is due to this reason. Once the underlying laws are found (laws of
gravity, laws of motion, electromagnetism, nuclear forces, quantum mechanics, etc), one has
complete control.
§ But the mind is very different. To begin with, no two minds work the same way. Under a given
set of conditions, each mind will chose to act differently. With physical objects, that is not so;
under a given set of conditions, what will happen can be predicted accurately.
§ Effects of some actions (kamma) may not materialize in this life and sometimes it may come to
fruition only in many lives down the road (but with accumulated interest).
§ Even in this life, mind phenomena are complex: This is why economics is not a “real science”.
It involves how people act sometimes “irrationally” for perceived gains. No economic theory
can precisely predict how a given stock market will perform.
7. When mechanical systems have time lags, those are predictable. We can set off a device to work in
a certain way AT A CERTAIN TIME, and we know that it will happen at that time if all mechanical
components work properly. Not so with the mind. When we act in a certain way, the RESULTS of
those actions may not be manifested for many lives. This is a key point to contemplate on.
§ But cause and effect is a nature’s basic principle. When something is done, it will lead to one
or more effects. In mind-related causes, the effects may take time, sometime a long time over
many lives, to trigger the “corresponding effect”.
§ Thus it should be clear that “action and reaction” associated with mind effects REQUIRE the
rebirth process. It is not readily apparent and is an essential part of the “previously unheard
Dhamma” that the Buddha revealed to the world.
§ This “cause and effect” that involves the mind is the principle of kamma and kamma
vipāka in Buddha Dhamma.
§ But unlike in Hinduism, Kamma is not deterministic, i.e., not all kamma vipāka have to come to
fruition; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“. All unspent kamma
vipāka become null and void when an Arahant passes away.
8. The life we have as a human is a RESULT of a past good deed. The life of a dog or an ant is the
result of a past deed by that sentient being.
§ And what happens to us in this life is a COMBINATION of what we have done in the past
(kamma vipāka) AND what we do in this life.
§ What happens to an animal is MOSTLY due to kamma vipāka from the past.
§ The difference between a human and an animal is that the animal does not have much control
over what is going to happen to it. But human birth is a special one: We have a higher level
mind that CAN change the future to some extent, and with possible enormous consequences.
9. What can we change and what cannot be changed?
§ We are born with a certain kamma vipāka built in. Our body features, major illnesses (such as
cancer) are mostly, not completely, built-in. We can avoid many kamma vipāka by acting with
mindfulness, i.e., by planning well, taking precautions, etc.
§ But we CANNOT change the fact that we are going to get old and eventually die, no matter
what we do. Our life a RESULT.
§ What we CAN change are the CAUSES for future lives.
§ Even though meditation cannot relieve us of most of the pre-determined suffering, proper
meditation CAN provide temporary relief, as well as PERMANENTLY removing future
suffering.
10. The second Noble Truth is describes those CAUSES that we need to work on. The root causes are
greed, hate, and ignorance, but they need to be removed mainly via understanding the Three
Characteristics (see #12 below) and also via removing our bad sansāric habits; see a series of posts
starting with, “Habits, Goals, Character (Gathi)” to “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“.
11. The Third Noble Truth is about what can be achieved by systematically removing those causes.
Nirāmisa sukha increases from the point of embarking on the Path, and has four levels of
PERMANENT increases starting at the Sotāpanna stage and culminating at the Arahant stage; there
are several posts starting with, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
12. And then Fourth Noble Truth is the way to attain nirāmisa sukha and then various stages of
Nibbāna. Nirāmisa sukha starts when one lives a moral life (see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa
Akusala)” and follow-up posts). The root causes of immoral behavior are greed, hate, and ignorance.
Ignorance can be reduced to the extent of attaining the Sotāpanna stage just via comprehending the
Three Characteristics of “this world of 31 realms”, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“, and the follow-up posts. It is that powerful.
§ Once one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one can find the rest of the way by oneself.
13. There are many different ways to describe and analyze what I summarized above. Different
people can grasp Dhamma by looking at it from different angles. That is what I try to cover with
sections like “Dhamma and Science”, “Dhamma and Philosophy”, and for those who like to dig
deeper into Dhamma, the section on “Abhidhamma” which means “Higher or Deeper Dhamma”.
§ My goal is to provide a “wide view” that accommodates most people. Even though I cannot
even begin to cover even a significant fraction of Buddha Dhamma, one does not need to
understand “everything” even to attain the Arahanthood. The Buddha has said that one could
attain all four stages of Nibbāna just via comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta at deeper and
deeper levels. This is because with deeper understanding, one’s mind automatically directs one
in the right direction.
§ Another reason that I try to cover many topics is to illustrate the point that Buddha Dhamma is
a complete description of nature.
Our lives and existence are based on constantly getting into debt and then paying off debts. This latter
is done by Nature whether we like it or not. When we steal, kill, lie, or do any of the dasa akusala,
we get into debt, and the nature keeps track of that via kammic energy.
§ We are reborn to pay debts. This is another way of looking at the cycle of rebirths. Nature will
automatically make sure that the largest debts are paid off first; this is how the next existence
(bhava) is determined.
§ During a given lifetime, debts are paid off when suitable conditions appear; see, “Anantara and
Samanantara Paccaya“.
§ Nature is the final arbitrator. A criminal may be able to get away with a crime by hiring a good
lawyer, but will have to pay for the crimes in the nature’s court. Similarly, when we do
something good, we will get the rewards regardless of whether we wish for anything in return
or not. Most people do not realize this because of the time delay between the act (kamma) and
its result (kamma vipāka).
1. When we do either a moral or an immoral act, that is done with an intention and has some energy
associated with it. This is called kammic energy. That energy resides in the universe until spent or
otherwise reduced by some means (this is related to quantum entanglement; see, “Quantum
Entanglement – We are All Connected“). It is really the principle of energy conservation in physics.
§ We can become indebted to a living being or to the “world as a whole”.
§ There were no vinaya rules in Buddha sāsana for about 20 years after the Buddha attained
Enlightenment. When Buddha Dhamma started flourishing, unscrupulous people started
becoming monks to live a comfortable life depending on the kindness of the devotees. The
Buddha admonished them about the consequences of becoming indebted and started setting up
the vinaya (“vi” + “naya”, where “naya” in Pāli or Sinhala means debt) rules to rein in those
people.
2. When there is an energy imbalance, nature tries to bring it to balance. For a given individual (in the
conventional sense), i.e., a life stream (absolute sense), the biggest imbalances are settled first.
§ Thus at death when paṭisandhi takes place, the biggest kamma seed with highest imbalance
come into play, and releases that energy by initiating the next birth in the corresponding
“bhava“; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“. Thus the next “bhava”
is determined by the biggest kammic seed at the end of the current “bhava” (this is really a
simple interpretation of a complex process).
§ During a lifetime (pavutti vipāka), in addition to the energy content, the prevailing conditions
also come into play for delivering kamma vipāka or the release of kamma seeds. This is why we
can prevent many bad kamma vipāka from come to fruition by acting with yoniso manasikara
or by “being mindful”; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
§ In both cases (paṭisandhi and pavutti vipāka), “matching conditions” plays a big role; see,
“Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“. For example, a seed does not germinate if it is in a dry
place; it needs to be in the ground with water and sunlight in order to germinate.
3. Getting back to the issue of coming to equilibrium, a stone is in equilibrium when it stays on the
ground. If we pick it up and throw it up it goes up because we gave it some energy. But now it is not
in equilibrium, and it will fall down to find its equilibrium position on the ground. The only
difference with kammic energy is that the kammic energy could be released much later; it has to find
suitable conditions to release that energy; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma
Vipāka“, and “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Overview“; Thus the release of kammic energy is more akin to
the process of germination of a seed; there is a time lag until suitable conditions appear.
§ A seed, when placed in the ground, germinates and becomes a tree by releasing the energy that
is trapped in the seed. When the energy is all spent, the tree will die. Unless the tree itself made
more seeds during its lifetime, that tree is the only “result” of that original seed.
4. Through numerous lives in the past we have accumulated innumerable number of both good and
bad kammic energy packets, or kamma beeja, or kamma seeds and we keep producing them in this
lifetime too; some are big and some are small (actually, those done beyond 91 mahā kalpas have lost
their energy; like everything else in this world, kammic energy is not permanent either). The small
kammic seeds bring in results (vipāka) during any lifetime, and the really big ones (kamma patha) are
the ones that determine “bhava” for a new life at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ Does that mean we have to remove all kamma seeds to stop rebirth, i.e., to attain Nibbāna? No.
A new “bhava” is grasped at the “upādāna paccayā bhavo” step in the paṭicca samuppāda
cycle; see “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“. If one has removed ignorance (avijjā) and
understood the true nature of the world, then there is no “taṇhā” and thus there is no upādāna at
the “taṇhā paccayā upādāna” step, and thus no “bhava“, and no “jāti” or rebirth.
§ However, in order to remove ignorance (avijjā), we have to purify our minds. For that we need
to understand the true nature of “this world”, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta. For that we need to
get rid of the five hindrances (panca nivarana) that are covering our minds and not letting the
mind comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta. That is where the removal of bad kamma seeds and
accumulation of good kamma seeds (i.e., doing good deeds and avoiding bad deeds) become
important; of course “deeds” here include actions, speech, and thoughts.
5. The point is that every time we do a moral or an immoral act we generate a kamma seed that
embeds the “javana power” of the thought that led to the act; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of
Mental Power“. The kammic power associated with a moral act can be considered surplus in one’s
“account” that can be used to enjoy things in life; an immoral act leads to a debt, i.e., it appears on the
negative side of the ledger. If one does an immoral act against another living being, then one be in
debt to that being until it is paid off; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
6. The nature tries to keep things in balance: the good kamma bring good results and bad kamma
brings bad results when the nature implements this balancing act. In both cases, we can take
advantage of this by arranging conditions for good kamma seeds to germinate and not letting bad
kamma seeds to germinate; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“. The
development of good habits and getting rid of bad habits go along with this process; see, “Habits and
Goals“, and “Sansaric Habits and Āsavas“. Please review these links carefully. All these tie up
together.
7. Thus we are bound to this saṃsāra or the cycle of rebirths because we do things to make an
“imbalance” either via moral or immoral deeds: good deeds lead to good rebirths and bad one to bad
rebirths. They both extend the sansāric journey. However, it is essential to engage in moral deeds in
order to avoid birth in the four lowest realms (apāyas), where the suffering is great AND also there is
no opportunity to moral deeds. Thus one MUST do moral deeds until one attains Nibbāna.
§ Moral deeds WILL have their consequences (they add up in the “plus side of the ledger”),
whether or not one wishes for anything in return, i.e., the nature will pay back. However, if one
does a moral deed AND wishes for something other than Nibbāna, then that is done with greed,
and thus one is simultaneously doing an immoral act.
§ Only an Arahant does not do any moral or immoral deeds that have kammic consequences that
are potent enough to bring rebirth. All an Arahant does is low-level saṅkhāra or “kriya” (like
walking and talking), and is “in equilibrium” with nature.
8. When one goes “off the equilibrium”, greed and hate intensify and one is likely do immoral acts to
become indebted. On the other hand, when one is in some kind of a samādhi, the mind is close to
equilibrium, and thus greed and hate are under control. If one attains rupavacara and then
arupavacara jhānas then the mind gets even more closer to equilibrium. Samādhi attains perfection
when one becomes an Arahant.
§ This is why one needs to stay away from doing immoral acts, if one wants to get results in
meditation. A purified mind can easily get to samādhi; see, “The Basics in Meditation“.
§ One becomes indebted via greed, hate, or ignorance (here ignorance means not knowing the
true nature of the world or anicca, dukkha, anatta); thus there is lobha vinaya, dosa vinaya, and
moha vinaya.
Within thousand years of the Buddha’s Parinibbāna (passing away), certain key concepts became
distorted. For many years, I had nagging questions on the compatibility of certain concepts that are
widely published in “Buddhist literature”, including Theravāda literature. For example, explanations
of anicca, anatta, sunyata, did not make sense to me. Furthermore, I got lost in a myriad of
explanations for terms like saṅkhāra; there are three different meanings for that word in standard
Theravāda texts.
When I started listening to the desanās by Waharaka Thero in Sri Lanka, it became immediately
apparent to me that “this was the true Dhamma”; see, “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
Furthermore, concepts like saṃsāra, sammā, saṅkhāra became crystal clear while I was just
listening. I hope I will be able to convey this information as clearly below.
This main section has the following sub-sections:
o Subsection: Nibbāna
§ How to Taste Nibbāna
§ Nirāmisa Sukha
o Subsection: Sorting out Some Key Pāli Terms (Taṇhā, Lobha, Dosa, Moha, etc)
§ Kāma Taṇhā, Bhava Taṇhā, Vibhava Taṇhā
§ Saññā (Perception)
§ Vedanā (Feelings)
3.1 San
1. A key Pāli word, the meaning of which has been hidden for thousands of years, is
“san” (pronounced like son). “San” is basically the term for “good and bad things we acquire”
through our moral/immoral deeds.
§ By understanding this root word, one can easily see the meanings of many important Pāli
words, without looking for roots in Sanskrit.
2. There is a reason for calling what we “acquire or add” as “san.” In Pāli and Sinhala, the word for
numbers is “sankhyā,” and sankhyā = “san” + “khyā,” meaning add and subtract. Addition and
subtraction involve sankhyā.
§ From this, “san” gives the idea of “acquiring or adding.”
§ In the same way, “khyā” implies “removal or subtraction.”
3. Therefore “san” is used to indicates things we do to lengthen our sansāric (or samsāric)
journey. See below for examples.
§ These “san” are nothing else but dasa akusala (that lead to rebirth in the apāyās) and also
puñña kamma (that lead to rebirths in the “good realms”); see, “Kusala and Akusala Kamma,
Punna and Pāpa Kamma“.
§ One may wonder why “san” includes moral deeds or puñña kamma. That is because they also
lead to rebirths (“add” to sansāric journey).
§ However, one MUST do puñña kamma to avoid rebirth in the apāyās.
4. In the same way “Khyā” or “Khaya” indicate the shortening of the sansāric journey.
§ Nibbāna is attained via removal of defilement (rāga, dosa, moha), and thus Nibbāna is
“rāgakkhaya“, “dosakkhaya“, and “mohakkhaya“.
§ Those three words have roots in “khaya” or “subtraction or removal.” For example, rāgakkhaya
comes from “rāga” + “khaya,” which combined to pronounce as rāgakkhaya.
§ Thus it is quite clear that rāgakkhaya means “removing rāga.” Same for “dosakkhaya,” and
“mohakkhaya.” Removal of rāga, dosa, and moha lead to Nibbāna.
5. Just by grasping these key ideas, it is possible to understand the roots of many common words,
such as saṅkhāra, sansāra, saññā, sammā, etc. Let us analyze some of these words.
§ We “add to” our rebirth process when we do “san“. The Pali word for “doing” is
“khāra” (Sinhala word is “kāra” or කාර). That is the origin of the word “saṅkhāra” (“san” +
“khāra“); the Sinhala word is saṅkhāra or සංකාර).
6. From Paṭicca Samuppāda, all sufferings start with, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“. Thus, when one
gets rid of avijjā completely, all saṅkhāra are stopped and one attains Nibbāna. That is accomplished
in the Arahant stage.
§ From the WebLink: suttacentral: Manasikāra Sutta (AN 11.8): “‘etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ,
yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho
nibbānan’ti.“
§ Translated: “It is peaceful, it is serene, the expelling of all saṅkhāra, breaking of bonds,
removing greed and hate; Nibbāna.” So, it is quite clear that by stopping all saṅkhāra one
attains Nibbāna.
7. However, a distinction needs to be made between saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra. The prefix “abhi”
means “stronger” or “coarse”.
§ Saṅkhāra involves EVERYTHING that we do to live in “this world” of 31 realms; these
include breathing, walking, eating, pretty much everything. Even an Arahant has to be engaged
in saṅkhāra until Parinibbāna or death.
§ Saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra by engaging in the “wheeling process”; see, “Nibbāna – Is it
Difficult to Understand?“. The sansāric process or the rebirth process is fueled by
abhisaṅkhāra.
8. The bad things we acquire – with lobha (greed), dosa (hate), moha (delusion) – contribute to
rebirth in the lower four realms; these are apuññābhisaṅkhāra (or apuñña abhisaṅkhāra). Here
“apuñña” means “immoral”.
§ The good things we acquire via alobha, adosa, amoha help gain rebirth in humān realm and
above; these are puññābhisaṅkhāra (or puñña abhisaṅkhāra). Here “puñña” means “moral”.
§ Thus, both kinds contribute to lengthening the rebirth process, but we DO need to do
puññābhisaṅkhāra for two reasons: (i) it prevents us from doing bad things, (ii) done with right
intention, it will help purify our minds, i.e., puñña kamma can become kusala kamma; see #18
below.
9. Another important term “sammā” which comes from “san” + “mā“, which means “to become free
of san“. Here “mā“, means “becomes free of”. For example:
§ “Mā hoti jati, jati“, means “may I be free of repeated birth”.
§ “mā me bāla samāgamo” means “may I be free of association with those who are ignorant of
Dhammā”.
10. The keyword sandiṭṭhiko comes from san + diṭṭhi (meaning vision), i.e. ability to see “san” or
defilement.
§ One becomes sandiṭṭhiko (one who is able to see “san” clearly) at the Sotāpanna Anugāmi
stage. Most texts define sandiṭṭhiko with inconsistent words like self-evident, immediately
apparent, visible here and now, etc.
11. Another very important word is saññā which come from san + ñā (meaning knowing) = knowing
or understanding “san”. This actually happens when one attains Nibbāna. Until then one has a
distorted perception (saññā) is clouded or distorted. See, “Saññā – What It Really Means.”
§ When we see people, for example, we identify them according to our familiarity with them or
based on our perceptions of them. We do not “see” the true nature of anything until Nibbāna is
attained. Thus it is said that until we attain Nibbāna, we have distorted (vipallāsa, Sinhala is
vipareetha) saññā.
§ Don’t worry about some of these deeper meanings, if you are not familiar with them. At least
one is able to see a connection to the root word “san“.
12. Sanvara = san + vara, where vara means “remove”. Therefore, sanvara means removing “san”
via moral behavior, also called “sīla“.
§ “Sanvarattena seelan” means moral behavior that comes automatically upon one becoming a
Sandiṭṭhiko (a Sotāpanna Anugāmi or a Sotāpanna.
§ Sanvara sīla will be automatically enforced 24 hours a day, not just on specific days, because it
comes naturally, with understanding.
§ On the other hand, “Yam samādanam tam vatam”, means observing the five precepts or eight
precepts on specific days is just a ritual, or “vata”. Such rituals are good starting points but will
be “upgraded to” Sanvara sīla when one gains wisdom (paññā).
13. Another keyword is sansāra or samsāra which means “rebirth process”.
§ That, of course, comes from san + sāra, where “sāra” means fruitful. We do “san” willingly
because we perceive them to be good (“sāra”). Then we get trapped in the rebirth process.
§ Note that sometimes it is natural to pronounce with the “m” sound; that is the reason for writing
is as “samsāra.” See more examples in #15 below.
§ We have the wrong perception that “san” are good and fruitful. Thus one continues in the long
rebirth process by doing saṅkhāra (and especially abhisansāra) with the wrong perception that
those are fruitful.
14. A nice example to illustrate the significance of “san”, is to examine the verse that Ven. Assaji
delivered to Upatissa (the lay name of Ven. Sariputta, who was a chief disciple of the Buddha):
“Ye dhammā hetu pabbavā, te san hetun Tathagato āha, Te san ca yo nirodho, evam vadi mahā
Samano”
Te = three, hetu = cause, pabbava = pa +bhava or “repeated birth” (see, “Pabhassāra Citta, Radiant
Mind, and Bhavanga“, nirodha = nir+uda = stop from arising.
§ The translation is now crystal clear:
“All dhammā that give rise to the rebirth process arise due to causes arising from the three “san”s:
rāga, dosa, moha. The Buddha has shown how to eliminate those “san”s and thus stop such dhammā
from arising”
§ “Dhammā” here does not mean Buddha Dhammā, but dhammā in general; see, “What are
Dhammā? – A Deeper Analysis“.
15. Knowing the correct meaning of such terms leads to a clear understanding of many terms:
§ Sangāyanā = san + gāyanā (meaning recite)= recite and categorize “san” (and ways to remove
them) in organizing Dhammā for passing down to future generations. The first Sangāyanā took
place just three months after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha.
§ Saṃyutta Nikāya of the Tipiṭaka contains suttas that explain “san“: “san” + “yutta”, with “
yutta” meaning “connected with” (it rhymes as “saṃyutta”). Note that most English translations
refer to Saṃyutta Nikāya as “Connected Discourses, but do not say connected to what.
§ Sanvega (or “samvega”) = san + vega (meaning speed) = forceful, strong impulses due to
“san”.
§ Sanyoga (or “samyoga“) = san + yoga (meaning bond) = bound together via “san”.
§ Sansindheema = san + sindheema (meaning evaporate, remove) = removing san, for example,
via the seven steps described in the Sabbāsava Sutta. This leads to nirāmisa sukha or Nibbānic
bliss.
§ Sansun = san + sun (meaning destroy) = with the removal of “san” (“sun” rhymes like soup)
one’s mind becomes calm and serene.
§ Sancetanā = san + cetanā = defiled intentions.
§ Samphassa = san + phassa = defiled sense contact.
Over 70 Pāli words with the “san” root are given at “List of “San” Words and Other Pāli Roots“.
16. We will encounter many such instances, where just by knowing what “san” is, one could
immediately grasp the meaning of a certain verse. Most of these terms are easily understood in the
Sinhala language.
§ Contrary to popular belief, it is NOT Sanskrit that is closely related to the māgadhi language
that the Buddha spoke, it is Sinhala (or Sinhalese) that is closely related to māgadhi (māgadhi=
“maga” + “adhi” = Noble path).
17. The Tipiṭaka is in Pāli with Sinhala script (Pāli does not have its own alphabet). Pāli is a version
of māgadhi suitable for writing down oral discourses in summary form suitable for transmission; see,
“Preservation of the Dhamma“. More posts on that at, “Historical Background“.
§ Many Pāli words have complex meanings and need to be explained in detail. That is the reason
for many commentaries. However, most early commentaries no longer exist and those recent
ones have many errors; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early European
Scholars.”
§ A good example is the key Pāli word “anicca.” That word got confused with “anitya,” which is
a Sanskrit word. That Sanskrit word does mean “impermanence,” but the Pāli word “anicca”
has a very different meaning.
§ The actual meaning of anicca becomes clear when one realizes that the Pāli word
“icca” (pronounced “ichcha”) means “this is what I like”. Thus anicca has the opposite
meaning (“na” + “icca“) or “cannot keep it the way I like”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
18. One’s tendency (i.e., gati) to do dasa akusala gets one bound to this world of 31 realms. Until one
removes such “bad gati“, one will have the following associated characteristics: āsava, anusaya,
samyojana, etc; see , “Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna.”
§ As long as one has any type of gati, āsava, anusaya, samyojana, one has the ability to pile
up more “san” or to do dasa akusala.
§ Once one removes the strongest of the dasa akusala (and especially the 10 types of micchā
diṭṭhi), one will be able to grasp the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Then one’s puñña kamma will become kusala kamma, leading to the four stages of Nibbāna.
This is a subtle point, but is explained in simple terms in the post, “Is It Necessary for a
Buddhist to Eliminate Sensual Desires?“.
§ Some saṅkhāra arise from with alobha, adosa, or amoha as a root cause; see, “Kusala-Mūla
Paṭicca Samuppāda“. The other types of saṅkhāra arise from avijjā (ignorance), and have lobha
(greed), dosa (hatred), or moha (delusion) as a root cause; see, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca
Samuppāda“.
3.1.2 Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka
There is much confusion about these words. These are key Dhamma concepts, and one needs to sort
them out in order to really understand other key concepts like rebirth and Paṭicca Samuppāda. Please
read the post, “What is “San”? – Meaning of Sansāra (or Samsāra)” before reading this post.
§ Note that puññābhi saṅkhāra is puñña+abhisaṅkhāra, and similarly the other two are also
abhisaṅkhāra. Also, “apuñña” means immoral,” puñña” means moral, and “anenja” means
“higher jhānic“. All three modes lead to rebirth in one of the 31 realms (lowest 4 realms with
apuññābhi saṅkhāra, realms 5 through 27 with puññābhi saṅkhāra, and realms 28 through 31
with annejabhi saṅkhāra, respectively).
§ Thus any kind of abhisaṅkhāra is done with ignorance (avijjā or not knowing the real
characteristics of this world of 31 realms: anicca, dukkha, anatta).
§ However, we will see below that we do need to accumulate puññābhi saṅkhāra in a strategical
way, mainly to avoid rebirth in the apāyas (lowest four realms) until we attain Nibbāna.
2. As we saw above, “san” is what one acquires when one does anything with sancetana (“san” +
“cetana”). Saṅkhāra (san+kāra) is simply actions that lead to acquiring “san“. However, it is only
“abhisaṅkhāra” or saṅkhāra that arise through avijjā that can lead to rebirth. There is a
difference between saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra: [kāra, (m.), deed; service; act of homage]
§ When deeds are done to live in this world, one has to do saṅkhāra. They become abhisaṅkhāra
when those are done with greed, hate, and/or ignorance. Saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra when
one starts generating further thoughts (“wheeling process”) about the sense experiences
(pictures, sounds, tastes, etc) ; see #9 on “Nibbāna – Is It Difficult to Understand?“.
§ Thus an Arahant does saṅkhāra to live; even breathing is kāya saṅkhāra. But an Arahant has
stopped the “wheeling process” or form an attachment to what is seen, heard, etc. It is that
“wheeling process”, which is detailed in the Paṭicca Samuppāda section that leads to
abhisaṅkhāra.
§ When those saṅkhāra become strong, they are called “abhisaṅkhāra” or “strong saṅkhāra” that
can lead to rebirths.
3. Abhisaṅkhāra are three kinds as mentioned above:
§ There are actions that lead to bad consequences during life and also to bad rebirths in the four
lowest realms (apāyas). These are “apuññābhi saṅkhāra” or immoral deeds: apuññā abhi
saṅkhāra..
§ Actions that lead to good consequences in life and also to good rebirths are called “puññābhi
saṅkhāra” or meritorious deeds; these lead to birth in good realms (human, deva, and the rūpa
lokas), thus avoiding rebirth in bad realms where one could get trapped for many eons. Thus it
is important to accumulate puññābhi saṅkhāra: puññā abhi saṅkhāra.
§ When one cultivates “lokiya jhānas” or mundane higher meditative states (arūpa jhāna leading
to rebirth in the highest four arūpa loka realms), via breath meditation for example, one is able
to be reborn in the four higher Brahma worlds. These also prolong saṃsāra, and are called
“ānenjābhi saṅkhāra“: ānenja abhi saṅkhāra.
§ It is interesting to note that “ānenja” means “no more rebirths” and thus “permanent”: the
ancient yogis (including Alara Kalama and Uddakarama Putta) thought these realms have
infinite lifetimes and equated the births there to the “ultimate release”. Of course, the Buddha
found out that those also have finite lifetimes, even though extremely long, lasting eons
(billions of years).
§ Here those yogis can temporarily suppress all desires for kāma loka or rūpa loka existences.
However, since they had not comprehended the anicca nature, they still have “hidden avijjā” or
“avijjā anusaya“.
4. Therefore, it is easy to remember abhisaṅkhāra as those actions that lead to prolonging saṃsāra
(or samsāra), the cycle of rebirths. There is a “latent energy” that is produced by each such action
(abhisaṅkhāra) that will give fruits at a later time.
§ Such “actions” can be done via the mind, speech, or the body; these lead to mano saṅkhāra,
vacī saṅkhāra, and kāya saṅkhāra respectively. The “defiled actions” are abhisaṅkhāra.
5. Does this mean one should not do meritorious deeds (with puññābhisaṅkhāra) because those also
prolong saṃsāra? No. The Buddha emphasized that one should not shy away from doing meritorious
deeds.
§ There is a way to do meritorious deeds without prolonging saṃsāra, and that is detailed in the
“Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“, an important part of the Buddha’s Paṭicca
samuppāda doctrine that has been hidden for thousands of years. But one needs to stay
away from wishing for “things in return” for such meritorious deeds as much as possible,
because such thoughts are based on greed.
§ In the Abhidhamma language, one should generate “ñāṇa sampayutta, somamnassa sahagata
citta” (thoughts generated with wisdom and joy), which is the highest moral (sobhana) citta.
Here wisdom means comprehension of the true nature; it starts with getting rid of 10 micchā
diṭṭhi and then further grows as one understands anicca, dukkha, anatta to higher levels.
Wisdom culminates at the Arahant stage.
§ Any good deed will have its good consequences whether one wishes or not. By wishing for
“material things” or “jhānic pleasures” one turns a meritorious action to either a less potent
“ñāṇa vippayutta” (devoid of wisdom) moral citta or even an apuññābhi saṅkhāra. We will
discuss that below.
Kamma (Actions to Prolong Saṃsāra)
Kammic energy is generated when one turns saṅkhāra to abhisaṅkhāra by the “wheeling process”;
see above. For example, when one sees an object, that is just saṅkhāra due to a kamma vipāka.
However, if one then starts thinking about how good it is, or think about how to acquire it, then it
becomes abhisaṅkhāra; here one now has INTENTIONS about that object, one is hoping to get
something.
§ That is why the Buddha said, “cetana ham Bhikkhave kamman vadami“, i.e., “I say that
intention is kamma“.
§ So it is important to remember that kamma is intention, and even though it can be done by the
mind, speech, or the body, all those have their root in the mind. We cannot say anything or do
anything without a thought in the mind to do so (see the Abhidhamma section for details).
§ For example, the intention to go for a walk is a kamma that does not have any power to
generate a good or bad vipāka in the future. That kamma will only get that task done.
Thus the key to Nibbāna is to stop valuing and thinking about kāma āsvada [kāma assāda] (sense
pleasures; āsvada in Sinhala). This cannot happen until one sees the fruitlessness of sense pleasures
in the long run (anicca, dukkha, anatta); see, the section “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“ under Paṭicca
Samuppāda. [assāda:[m.] “mind-made pleasures”; taste; enjoyment; satisfaction.]
Kamma Beeja (Kamma Seeds) or Kamma Bhava
When a kamma (abhisaṅkhāra) is committed, the kammic potential of that kamma is deposited in a
kamma beeja (kamma seed); kamma seed is NOT a physical entity, it is an “energy” or “potential” to
bring about an effect in the future. It can also be called a “kamma bhava“.
§ A kamma seed can be compared to a normal seed, say for example, a seed of an apple tree. The
potential to bring about a fully grown apple tree is in the apple seed. However, if the seed is
kept in a dry place with no contact with soil, it does not get to germinate. It will germinate if
placed under soil and fed with water and nutrients. Then it can grow to an apple tree which can
yield thousand more seeds.
§ Similarly, a kamma seed has the POTENTIAL to germinate or come to fruition if suitable
conditions appear; but a kamma seed is an energy lying below the suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] stage. It can then yield results with an impact that is many times the impact of
the original deed (this holds true for both good and bad); the results are the kamma vipāka; see,
“What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
§ It is also possible to remove many of one’s bad kamma seeds. When we acquire a “bad
kamma seed” we get indebted to another being. Just like one can be debt-free by paying off
existing loans, one can “pay back” old debts that have been accumulated in the cycle of rebirths
by “transferring merits” when one does good deeds, and also by doing the Ariya metta
bhāvanā; see, “Transfer of Merits (Pattidana)- How Does that Happen?” and “5. Ariya Metta
Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness Meditation)“.
Nothing in this world is permanent (but that impermanence is not anicca); kammic energy in a
kamma seed also eventually loses its power, and the “staying power” depends on the strength of the
particular kamma. For example, those seed corresponding to “anantariya akusala kamma” such as
killing one’s parents or an Arahant, will bring fruits without delay (i.e., in the very next birth) before
they lose their power.
Kamma Vipāka (Results of a Kamma Seed or Kamma Bhava)
So it is important to distinguish between kamma and kamma vipāka: the first is the action, second is
the consequence. When someone laments “this is my kamma” when he/she faces a bad situation, what
is really meant is that this happens “because of what I had done in the past”. It is a kamma vipāka.
When one does something good or bad that kammic energy is deposited as a kamma beeja (seed),
which is also called a kamma bhava. Then that kammic energy can give rise to kamma vipāka in the
future when suitable conditions materialize. There are two ways to avoid kamma vipāka:
§ Just like a seed will not germinate until the right conditions appear (soil, water, sunlight),
kamma vipāka cannot materialize until suitable conditions appear. Thus by acting mindfully
(not getting into “bad situations”) one can avoid them; see, “Anantara and Samanantara
Paccaya“.
§ Most importantly, we can remove many kamma seeds by doing metta bhāvanā. When we
acquire a bad kamma seed we become indebted to another being; we can get rid of that kamma
seed by paying off that debt. The best way to do that is to ask for forgiveness and transfer
merits of one’s good deeds to all beings (since we have become indebted to uncountable
number of beings); see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
Kamma vipāka (from the germination of seeds) lead to two main consequences:
§ They can lead to consequences during a lifetime (either the present or a future life). These are
called “pavutti kamma bhava“.
§ Some strong kamma vipāka give rise to new existence (in the rebirth process). These are called
“uppatthi kamma bhava“.
In either case, kamma vipāka are NOT deterministic. Both types can be reduced in strength or even
be made ineffective. This can be done via several ways:
§ When one becomes an Arahant, since there is no more rebirth, all kamma seeds that do not get
to come to fruition before the death of an Arahant become ineffective in producing a rebirth:
Because an Arahant has removed avijjā, the “akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle” becomes
ineffective and thus “bhava paccayā jāti” does not get to initiate a new birth.
§ However, even an Arahant is subjected to any kamma vipāka that get a chance to emerge
during the current life, especially the strong ones. Even the Buddha suffered from physical
pains during the last years of his life. Even if one transfers merits to other beings (as Arahants
do), if the other being cannot accept those merits, then those debts do not get paid off; see,
“Transfer of Merits (Pattidana) – How Does it Happen?“. Thus even the Buddha had a few
“unpaid debts” left.
§ We all have done innumerable kamma in this long saṃsāra. Thus many kamma seeds are
waiting to “bear fruit” under right conditions. This is a key point one really needs to digest. Just
like a seed can lay dormant for long times, and start germinating only under the right conditions
(soil, water), a kamma vipāka bears fruit only when the conditions become right.
§ Thus most kamma vipāka can be suppressed and avoided (not letting them germinate) by
acting with mindfulness (yoniso manasikara).This is where a calm mind helps. An agitated
mind is not able to make rational decisions. See, “Key to Calming the Mind“. As mentioned
there, working on the Five Hindrances (panca nivarana), that covers a mind, is important.
How to do Meritorious Deeds without Accumulating Abhisaṅkhāra
Most people, even born Buddhists, do not get this right. They think Nibbāna can be attained by just
doing meritorious deeds. Here are some key points to consider:
1. One definitely needs to avoid apuññābhi saṅkhāra (unmeritorious deeds) that will lead to bad life
events and/or bad rebirths, i.e., the four lower realms; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of the
Dhamma“. They are “akusala” by definition, but ones of the worst kind; these are called “pāpa” in
Pāli and Sinhala and “paw” (rhymes like “cow”) in Sinhala. This is what one needs to avoid in
leading a moral life; see, “Moral Living and Fundamentals“.
2. Punnābhi saṅkhāra (meritorious deeds) may be accompanied by apuññābhi saṅkhāra if one’s
intention is not good. If one does a good deed AND wishes for something in return, that wishing is
done with greed. Any good deed WILL produced good results whether one wishes or not. They
actually lead to good life events and good rebirths (at or above human realm). Thus puññābhi
saṅkhāra can help in pursuing Nibbāna, and should be done without greedy intentions. A
Sotāpanna automatically does meritorious deeds with such understanding; we will discuss this
in the “Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“. Thus the Aryan way is to do a good deed and share the
merits of that deed with all beings, instead of wishing for something in return.
§ Thus one needs to be careful here because one may be acquiring apuññābhi saṅkhāra at the
same time. This is a bit complex and is best illustrated with an example. Suppose one donates a
meal to a hungry person. That act is inherently one that will produce a good outcome. However,
if the person “makes a wish” such as “may I get delicious foods in the future because of this
good deed”, that is a greedy thought, a greedy intention (cetana). Thus while this does not
negate the good deed, it also could produce ANOTHER kamma vipāka leading to bad life
events.
§ This pitfall can be avoided by doing the good deed with a pure intention, that is not associated
with greed, hate, or ignorance. One gives a meal to hungry person out of compassion; to quench
the hunger. That is all. Here one does not lose any possible benefits of the act.
§ When one starts comprehending anicca (that one cannot maintain anything to one’s satisfaction
over the long run), one AUTOMATICALLY stops wishing for “good things”.
§ Furthermore, one can reap more benefits by additionally doing a mental act to quench the
potential of previous bad kamma seeds. This is called “giving of merits” or “pattidana” which
is mislabelled as “puñña anumodana” frequently; see, “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā“.
One could wish that the merits of this good deed be shared with all other beings. We have built-
up debts with all the beings in this long saṃsāra, that needs to be paid off (see, “Kamma, Debt,
and Meditation“). Thus, sharing the merits actually becomes a “visankhara” or “unwinding the
power of previous saṅkhāra“. This is thus one way to lessen the impact of previous bad kamma
vipāka.
§ The Buddha said that one always need to do good, meritorious, deeds. Giving is especially
encouraged. One could turn these deeds to visankhara by sharing the merits. By the way,
sharing merits does not remove any possible good outcomes to oneself. Those were
already acquired in the original act itself. The key here is not to wish for “profits in return”,
because such thoughts are associated with greed (of course this cannot be stopped by sheer will
power until one comprehends anicca).
3. The third kind of abhisaṅkhāra, “ānenjābhi saṅkhāra” are associated with higher (arupavacara)
jhānic states attained via samatha bhāvanā, such as breathing meditation or kasina meditation. They
are pursued in order to achieve higher meditative states, and thus are pursued with a greedy thought
(pleasure).
§ These meditation techniques do not help with the cleansing of the āsavas; see, “Sansaric
Habits, Character (Gathi) and Cravings (Āsava)“, and “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of
Āsavas“.
4. Jhānic states are achieved automatically when pursuing Nibbāna (not anāriya jhānas but Ariya
jhānas). The goal here was to achieve Nibbāna, and thus no saṅkhāra are accumulated in this
process. This brings up another question: Is seeking Nibbāna another type of craving (āsava)?
§ Nibbāna is attained via removing craving for everything in this world: “ragakkhayo
Nibbanan, Dosakkhayo Nibbanan, Mohakkhayo Nibbanan”.
§ “Craving” for Nibbāna is called chanda (one of the The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara
Iddhipada). This “liking for Nibbāna” is the key factor that fuels the other three: viriya (effort),
citta (thoughts), and vimansa (investigations).
§ Thus in seeking Nibbāna, one is not craving for anything in this world. One is thinking and
working diligently to comprehend the true nature of the world (vimansa), and with that wisdom
gained, the mind automatically gives up craving for anything.
Kāya, Vacī, and Mano Saṅkhāra
1. Saṅkhāra can lead to body movements, speech, and thoughts; they are respectively called Kāya,
Vacī, and Mano Saṅkhāra. If those are not done with greed, hate, or ignorance, they are merely
saṅkhāra. But if they are done with greed, hate, or ignorance, they become abhisaṅkhāra.
§ The recent post, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means” for a detailed description.
2. Briefly, mano saṅkhāra are automatically generated based on our gathi. All our thoughts that
make body parts move (except for speech) are kāya saṅkhāra. Vacī saṅkhāra are generated when we
move our mouth, lips, tongue, etc to speak.
§ When we are thinking about doing something we “play it out” in the mind (for example reciting
something silently in the mind). That is mostly vacī saṅkhāra and are also called vitakka and
vicara; when we are thinking and contemplating Dhamma concepts, they are called savitakka
and savicara, with the prefix “sa” denoting “good”.
§ Thus “talking to oneself” is done with vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī
Saṅkhāra“.
§ Mano saṅkhāra are just feelings (vedanā) and perceptions (saññā) that arise automatically due
to a sense input that comes via a kamma vipāka.
3. Thus it is clear that most enjoyments that we experience come through vacī saṅkhāra. We can be
sitting at one place quietly and generating enormous amounts of vacī saṅkhāra, thoroughly enjoying
the experience. Most people do this when they go to bed at night while waiting to fall asleep.
§ It is a good idea to try to keep the mind away from defiled thoughts while falling asleep; this
can be done getting to habit of thinking about a Dhamma concept, or to listen to chanting of
sutta (pirith), keeping the volume low (like playing background music); see, “Sutta Chanting
(with Pāli Text)“. It will be easier to fall asleep and one will have a restful sleep too.
For more details, see, “Kamma are Done with Saṅkhāra – Types of Saṅkhāra “.
In the previous introductory post, “What is “San”?”, we introduced the term “saṅkhāra”, and in the
next post saṅkhāra was discussed in somewhat technical terms. Since it is such an important term, in
this post I will discuss it in a bit more detail.
1. Buddha Dhamma is based on the fact that all “saṅkhāra” are done in vain: “sabbe saṅkhāra
anicca”.
§ As we saw in the previous post, saṅkhāra (“san” + “kara” or actions; සන් + කාර in Sinhala) are
anything (thought, speech, bodily actions) done while living in “this world” of 31 realms. This
includes breathing, walking, or thinking about the chores for the day.
§ All saṅkhāra arise in the mind. We cannot utter a word or lift a finger without generating
saṅkhāra in the mind. It happens very fast, so it feels like we just speak or do things; see,
“Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means” and “Difference Between Dhammā and Saṅkhāra“.
2. So, all saṅkhāra involve thinking (some could be manifested as speech or bodily actions), but
some actions like breathing happens without CONSCIOUS thinking. Those are just saṅkhāra that do
not have kammic consequences.
§ However, saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra when they involve conscious thinking with lobha,
dosa, moha (or alobha, adosa, amoha) coming to play roles. Those abhisaṅkhāra have bad (or
good) kammic consequences.
§ Thus even an Arahant keeps doing saṅkhāra until death. But an Arahant does not do
abhisaṅkhāra, a “stronger version” of saṅkhāra that will lead to accumulating mental energy
(kamma) for future repercussions (kamma vipāka) until that kammic energy is exhausted.
§ In order for a saṅkhāra to become an abhisaṅkhāra, one of the six root causes (greed, hate,
ignorance, generosity, kindness, wisdom) need to be involved.
3. If the “bad roots” of greed, hate, and ignorance are involved, then those thoughts, speech, actions
will create kamma beeja (or energy seeds) that either lead to bad outcomes during a life or to rebirth
in the lowest four realms (apāyas). These are apuññābhisaṅkhāra (“apuñña” + “abhisaṅkhāra”
where “apuñña” means non-meritorious).
§ On the other hand, abhisaṅkhāra done with the “good roots” of generosity, kindness, wisdom
either lead to good outcomes during a life or to rebirth in the realms at or above the human
realm. These are puññābhisaṅkhāra (“puñña” + “abhisaṅkhāra” where “puñña” means
meritorious).
§ If no roots are involved, they are just saṅkhāra, and their kamma seeds are duds; there is no
energy in them. Basically one can say, saṅkhāra (that are not abhisaṅkhāra) do not generate
kamma seeds.
4. Let us take some examples. When we see someone is walking with a knife in hand, we cannot
come to a conclusion about what kind of saṅkhāra is that person is generating.
§ He may be just taking the knife from one place to another, in which case, it is just saṅkhāra.
§ If he is planning to stab someone, then he is generating apuññābhisaṅkhāra.
§ If he is planning to rescue an animal who got entangled in a trap, then he is generating
puññābhisaṅkhāra.
§ In any type of speech or bodily action, what really matters is the INTENTION behind the
speech or action.
5. In another example, we may see two people have built and donated two hospitals for the poor.
Even though both seem to be “good actions”, we cannot say both had puññābhisaṅkhāra. One could
have had an ulterior motive of getting elected in an upcoming election, rather than thoughts of loving
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 97
kindness for poor people. In that case, he would be generating mostly apuññābhisaṅkhāra, even
though there may be some puññābhisaṅkhāra involved too.
§ This is why sorting out kamma is impossible for anyone but a Buddha. Some of our actions
could involve both kinds of abhisaṅkhāra. For example, if we see a bird digging up a worm and
chase the bird away, we would have done both kinds of abhisaṅkhāra: Saving the life of the
worm is a puññābhisaṅkhāra, but we also did an apuññābhisaṅkhāra because we denied the
bird of its meal. Both types of abhisaṅkhāra can bear fruits (vipāka) in the future.
6. There is this famous “trolley problem” in ethics, where one could save five people from death by
sacrificing the life of a single person; see, WebLink: WIKI: Trolley problem
This “thought experiment” has been debated for many years. We can make the following
observations based on Buddha Dhamma:
§ If one decides to take action (i.e., save five by sacrificing one), then one will acquire “good
kamma” for saving the five lives, and “bad kamma” for killing the other person. Both types can
bear fruits in the future.
§ But it goes even deeper. What if the person that we sacrificed was an Arahant or at least a
Sotāpanna, and the other five were normal people or even criminals? Then we would have
acquired much more bad kamma than good kamma.
7. When someone is talking or doing some bodily action, we can at least try to guess what kind of
saṅkhāra are involved. But if a person is just sitting down quietly, he/she could be generating any
kind of saṅkhāra ranging from just thinking about whether or not to go out for a walk (just saṅkhāra)
to planning a murder (worst kind of apuññābhisaṅkhāra).
§ We generate more abhisaṅkhāra via thinking than via speech or actions.
§ When we have disagreement with other people, we normally do not hit the person or even
refrain from saying anything. But depending on the purity of our minds, we may be generating
a little to unimaginable amounts of apuññābhisaṅkhāra. This is a key factors that most people
tend to disregard.
§ If someone’s outward actions/speech seem to be “disciplined”, we automatically assume that
he/she is a good person; and the person may be trying to fool himself/herself by displaying that
outward appearance. But if the mind is impure, there could be a lot of hateful/greedy thoughts
in that mind. Whether or not any verbal or bodily actions are committed, those thoughts still
accumulate kamma seeds.
8. Therefore, it is utterly useless to judge other people. Each person has true awareness AND control
only over one’s own thoughts, speech, actions, which are ultimately based on the intentions.
§ But we know exactly what our own intentions are. And that is what really matters. We may
be able to fool a court of law by hiring a good lawyer, but we will have to reap the results of
what we sow in the future at some point.
9. This is the basis of ānāpāna meditation, to be aware of the types of saṅkhāra involved in a given
action; see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“. If someone asks us to join in fishing trip, we need to think what
kind of kamma will be associated with killing fish for our pleasure; this is the basic form of
“kayanupassana”. Contemplate on any bodily action one is about to do and abstain from doing it if it
involves apuññābhisaṅkhāra (in this case taking the lives of several fish for our pleasure).
§ Bodily actions are easier to prevent, because they take time and we have time to contemplate.
§ Speech is a bit more tricky, because speech comes out faster than carrying out bodily action.
Still one can stop oneself even after uttering a few sentences.
§ Thoughts are the hardest, and that is why “cittanupassana” comes after one has practiced
“kayanupassana”.
10. If one wants to start doing ānāpāna meditation, one should first control one’s bodily actions, and
the more one does it, the easier it becomes. And then it also becomes easier to control one speech.
When both actions and speech are brought under control, one’s thoughts will be easier to control too.
§ Furthermore, willfully engaging in puññābhisaṅkhāra also helps to keep apuññābhisaṅkhāra at
bay. By concentrating on meritorious deeds, one’s mind is automatically turned away from
thinking about unmeritorious deeds.
§ This is why real Buddhist meditation is much more than just formal sitting meditation. The key
is to purify the mind, and avoid defiling the mind at anytime. One could be doing the breath
meditation for a lifetime, but may not get anywhere in purifying the mind.
§ This is explained in detail and how to start practice in the “Living Dhamma” section. One does
not even need to believe in rebirth in the beginning.
11. Nibbāna is attained not by abstaining from both puññābhisaṅkhāra and apuññābhisaṅkhāra as
some suggest. On the way to Nibbāna, one needs to do puññābhisaṅkhāra AND also engage in
learning Dhamma so that one could comprehend the true nature of all types of saṅkhāra, i.e., that all
saṅkhāra are anicca, dukkha, anatta. This leads to the purification of the mind; just by doing
puññābhisaṅkhāra is not enough to purify the mind.
§ Ultimately, just by doing puññābhisaṅkhāra is not enough to purify the mind. However, one
MUST start there before being able to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Living
Dhamma“.
Next, “Difference Between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (Sankata)“, ……….
3.1.4 Difference Between Dhammā and Saṅkhāra
Revised March 22, 2017; April 17, 2017; November 5, 2017; July 19, 2018; August 9, 2019
We will discuss the difference between saṅkhāra, saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), and dhammā. Some
of the descriptions given here are not compatible with meanings given in many current Theravāda
texts. However, they are fully compatible with the Tipiṭaka. Please send me a comment
([email protected]) if you find evidence to the contrary.
§ First, it is essential to remember that the word “dhamma” can mean somewhat different things
in different contexts. In “Buddha Dhamma”, it means the “Buddha’s teachings”.
§ Dhammā (with a long “a” at the end) is mostly used to indicate energy created by the mind; it is
also called a kamma bīja.
§ But “sabbe dhammā” in “sabbe dhammā anattā” include everything, all phenomena belonging
to this world of 31 realms. Nibbāna is not in this world.
§ I always give links to other posts. It is not necessary to read them, but if one needs more
information or clarification, one should read them. That will make the concept to “really sink
in.”
1. There is confusion about the terms saṅkhāra and dhammā in the Dhammapada verses 277,278, and
279; the first lines in those three verses are:
§ “Sabbe saṅkhāra aniccā“ or “all saṅkhāra are anicca (things cannot be maintained to one’s
satisfaction in the long run).” A better way to say it is that it is futile to make plans for such
things in the long run. Of course, we must make plans for the necessary things to live this life.
§ “Sabbe saṅkhāra dukkhā“ or “all saṅkhāra eventually lead to dukkha (suffering).”
§ “Sabbe dhammā anattā“ or “all dhammā are without substance (not fruitful) at the end”.
2. Saṅkhāra are thinking, speaking, and acting based on our intentions, hopes, and dreams. It is
essential to realize that saṅkhāra are really our current thoughts.
§ “Saṅkhāra” include all three types (kāya saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, mano saṅkhāra) that lead to
any action, speech, or just thought (in that order). They all arise in citta (our thoughts).
§ We say “Hello” to someone that is done with vacī saṅkhāra. If we walk from the living room to
the kitchen to get a drink, that is done with kāya saṅkhāra. But those do not initiate kamma
vipāka; they are kammically neutral. But if we verbally abuse someone, that is done with strong
vacī saṅkhāra (abhisaṅkhāra), and that will have kamma vipāka.
§ More on saṅkhāra at, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means.”
3. Those saṅkhāra (or abhisaṅkhāra) that we generate may lead to the arising of an inert object or a
living form; it is said to lead to the arising of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
§ If one comes up with the idea of building a house, then the following steps may happen. He will
carefully think about it (mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra), and may talk about it with others (vacī
saṅkhāra). If he decides to do it, then he may take actions (kāya saṅkhāra) to make it happen.
In this case, our saṅkhāra gave rise to a house, and that house is a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala).
4. When we do something with the body (i.e., body movement), that is controlled by kāya saṅkhāra
that arise in our minds.
§ We are not robots (most lower animals are like robots). We can control our thoughts, speech,
and actions. Sometimes it may appear that we just do things automatically. But if we want to,
we can change our actions. Just try it out.
§ When we speak or talk to ourselves, that involves vacī saṅkhāra; those also arise in our minds;
see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra.”
§ Mano saṅkhāra are thoughts that arise automatically (due to kamma vipāka).
5. Building a house in #3 above may not involve moral/immoral intentions. One may not generate
strong saṅkhāra (called abhisaṅkhāra) that can create kamma bīja (dhammā), that can bring kamma
vipāka in the future. Building a house is just a kammically-neutral action.
§ However, planning to kill a human, for example, involves mano saṅkhāra and vacī saṅkhāra
(in the planning stage) and then doing it with kāya saṅkhāra.
§ In this case, all those saṅkhāra are abhisaṅkhāra, that can bring future bad kamma vipāka, in
the form of rebirth in the apāyas, which includes the animal realm.
6. Abhisaṅkhāra (potent or strong saṅkhāra) give rise to kamma bīja, which are also part of dhammā.
These are energies that were created by javana citta; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental
Power“. They can bring kamma vipāka.
§ However, there are dhammā that do not have energies (for example, nāma gotta, which are just
past memory records are also dhammā).
§ At the moment of death, such a strong kamma bīja or a dhammā comes to the mind via
“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ.” That new viññāṇa is the paṭisandhi
viññāṇa for the new life; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!.”
§ Therefore, now a new life is formed as a result of that abhisaṅkhāra. This new lifeform is also
called a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) because it arose due to that abhisaṅkhāra.
7. That saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) came to existence because of that abhisaṅkhāra during that
immoral act. It came to life at a later time via kamma vipāka.
§ Moral abhisaṅkhāra or puñña abhisaṅkhāra lead to good kamma bīja/dhammā that will lead to
good rebirths (in human, deva, and brahma realms).
§ Immoral abhisaṅkhāra or apuñña abhisaṅkhāra lead to bad kamma bīja/dhammā that will lead
to unfortunate rebirths (in the apāyās).
§ That is the link between mind and matter. An abhisaṅkhāra that arose in the mind led to the
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is a rūpa (made of matter).
§ That house in #3 was just put together by using existing rūpa. But it is also possible to “create”
new matter if one has abhiññā powers. Both are called saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
8. Any rūpa (including visible objects, sounds, smells, tastes, and body touches) that we experience
in this world is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), and they all undergo unpredictable change and
eventually are destroyed; see, “Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata.”
§ The point is that we make our own future via our actions, speech, and thoughts; these are
(abhi)saṅkhāra.
§ However, any of these new saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) will not last forever. Even if born in
deva or brahma realms, that kammic energy will run out one day. Then one will be directed to
the next birth depending on the most potent kamma bīja/dhammā present at that time.
§ The only difference is that one will be subjected to much suffering in the apāyas, while one will
get to enjoy a “good life” in a higher realm. We all have been going through this “unending
journey through most of the 31 realms,” which does not have a traceable beginning.
9. Another critical point is that the net result of all these “journeys through various realms” is
suffering. That is because we tend to do more immoral things in “seeking pleasure” and are
born mostly in the apāyas.
§ Any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) that we make for ourselves (whether it is a house or a new
life in the deva realm) that cannot be maintained to our satisfaction in the long run. The home
will need repairs, and may even get burned down or flooded. A new life in the deva realm will
end one day, and one will back to square one.
§ That is why it is said that “Sabbe saṅkhāra aniccā.” It is there because any saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala) (that arise due to abhisaṅkhāra) has a finite lifetime, and moreover, is subjected to
unexpected changes (viparināma) during that existence.
10. When we don’t get to maintain things to our satisfaction we suffer. Even if one makes a billion
dollars and has a lovely family, one will have to leave all that behind when one dies. But even before
that there could many other instances where one suffers (deaths of friends/family, diseases, loss of
property, etc). That is the viparināma nature that arise due to anicca nature.
§ And the root cause of that suffering is saṅkhāra (more correctly abhisaṅkhāra). That is why it
is said, “Sabbe saṅkhāra dukkhā.”
§ Again, saṅkhārā are basically our CURRENT thoughts; as soon as those thoughts go to
the past, they become nāma gotta or memories.
11. The only thing that is not destroyed is nāma gotta, which are just records of “all
events” (saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra) of any given lifestream; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of
a Lifestream“.
§ All these different terms could be confusing at first. But they will all make sense eventually.
They are all pieces of a big puzzle.
12. Ven. Walpola Rahula Thero, in his famous and otherwise excellent book, “What the Buddha
Taught” did not get it right when he interpreted those verses. He included Nibbāna in dhammā (p. 57
of 1974 edition). He took the difference between dhammā and saṅkhāra to be Nibbāna.
§ But as you can see, saṅkhāra and dhammā are two different entities. Saṅkhāra is what we
generate in our minds.
§ Strong saṅkhāra or abhisaṅkhāra lead to the creation of kammic energy, and that is a dhammā
or a kamma bīja.
§ However, there are many dhammā other than kamma bīja, only abhisaṅkhāra lead to kamma
bīja. But both saṅkhāra or abhisaṅkhāra lead to memory records or nāma gotta. Also, dhammā
include concepts and even Buddha Dhamma.
13. Furthermore, Nibbāna does not belong to this world. Therefore, to say Nibbāna is anatta is a
terrible mistake. There are four ultimate realities (paramattha): Thoughts (citta), mental factors
(cetasika), matter (rūpa), and Nibbāna.
§ Everything “in this world” can be described in terms of the first three. Nibbāna does not belong
to “this world”.
§ Furthermore, anatta is also mistranslated as just “no-self.” The problems with the traditional
interpretation of anicca, dukkha, anatta are discussed in,, “Anicca, Dukka, Anatta – Wrong
Interpretations.”
§ Furthermore, anicca, dukkha, anatta are characteristics of “this world of 31 realms”; Nibbāna is
not included.
14. When we do abhisaṅkhāra (strong types of saṅkhāra), that lead to the formation of good or bad
kamma bīja, or dhammā. That strong kamma bīja can lead to the arising of saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) (living beings and even inert things).
§ And nāma gotta (pronounced “nāma goththā”) are just records of what happened.
15. Unlike saṅkhāra, kamma bīja, and saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), nāma gotta are PERMANENT
(they are just records). As stated in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Najīrati Sutta (SN 1.76)“: “Rūpaṃ
jīrati maccānaṃ, nāmagottaṃ na jīrati“, or “material things decay and get destroyed, but nāmagotta
do not decay”.
§ That is why someone with abhiññā powers can go back at any point in time to recall past
events; also see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM).”
§ Whenever we do something (a saṅkhāra) an “record” (“nāma gotta“) is made. Thus for a given
sentient being, a record of all activities from the beginning-less time survives and is one’s nāma
gotta. All previous lives and all activities of past lives are in that “record stream,” like a movie
reel (not physical of course).
§ Someone who has developed abhiññā through anariya jhānas can trace back the nāma gotta for
several past lives. But with well-developed abhiññā powers, a much deeper history can be
probed. A Buddha can trace back as far back as he pleases with astonishing speed. (Yet he
could not see “a beginning” to any sentient being’s nāma gotta). That is why it is said that there
is no traceable beginning to the rebirth process.)
16. It is easier to explain this “nāma gotta” with an example. Let us take two popular US presidents,
John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. Their “physical bodies” are no longer with us, i.e., their “rūpa” or
physical bodies (which were saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) decayed long ago. But their nāma gotta
are with us to a certain extent. How much of their memories or “nāma gotta” remains with a given
person depends on how closely that person associated with them. The moment we say, “John
Kennedy” or “Ronald Reagan,” their picture comes to our mind. Not only that, those who met them
may remember that vividly and probably can recall that event just like watching a movie.
§ Similarly, we can recall many of the “events” of our lives or parts of our “nāma gotta“; some
young children can remember some events in their “nāma gotta” in their previous lives.
§ What can be done with abhiññā powers is very similar. The abhiññā capabilities enormously
stretch the memory or the ability to “look back” at past events in one’s nāma gotta.
17. We are subjected to suffering only because we make saṅkhāra (or plans) and since they do not
work out in the LONG RUN. Therefore, those saṅkhāra lead to dukkha at the end and thus to helpless
in the long run (anatta).
§ But nāma gotta or other types of dhammā does not lead to suffering. Therefore, dhammā do not
have the characteristics of anicca and dukkha.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
102 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ But there is nothing substantial to be had with dhammā too; they are also anatta.
18. The Buddha’s last words were, “Vaya dhammā saṅkhāra, appamādena sampādeta.” Everything
in this world (including saṅkhāra) is dhammā. Only saṅkhāra,i.e., those that lead to one’s demise
(i.e., lead to bad outcomes); therefore, sort out such “san” without delay” (“san” “pādeta”, which
rhymes as “sampādeta”).
18. The Buddha’s last words were, “vaya dhammā saṅkhāra, appamādena sampādeta.” Basically
everything in this world (including saṅkhāra) are dhammā. Only “saṅkhāra are vaya dhammā”, i.e.,
those that lead to one’s demise (i.e., lead to bad outcomes). Therefore, the Buddha instructed us to
“sort out such ‘san’ without delay” (“san” “pādeta”, which rhymes as “sampādeta”).
§ “Vaya” means destruction; here it means leading to the destruction of one’s future: saṅkhāra
are vaya dhammā..
§ Saṅkhāra are those these three types (mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra) that lead to “san” for
extending sansāra; see, “What is “San”? – Meaning of Sansara (or Samsara).”
§ Thus the Buddha was admonishing the bhikkhus that all saṅkhāra are “vaya dhamma” (those
leading to adverse outcomes), and therefore to comprehend what saṅkhāra are.
19. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Najirati Sutta (SN 1.76),” the nature of nāma gotta is clearly
stated:
§ “Rūpaṃ jīrati maccānaṃ, nāmagottaṃ na jīrati,” or, “material things are subject to decay or
jirati (pronounced “jeerathi“) and death or destruction (maccanam; pronounced
‘machchānam”), but nāma gotta do not decay.
§ The “rūpa” of those two US presidents we mentioned earlier have decayed and gone. But their
nāma gotta remain with us because they are mixed in with our nāma gotta at some points and
we can access our nāma gotta with memory. Someone with abhiññā powers can look at a
complete nāma gotta not only spanning a perfect life but also going back to many lives. All of
our nāma gotta, back to beginning-less time, are there whether accessed or not.
§ Dhammā — in the general sense – are basically anything in this world (including nāma gotta
and paññāti or concepts) and are without any substance too; they are all anatta. There is no
point in “hanging on to them.”
§ Even Buddha Dhamma, which enables us to attain Nibbāna should ultimately be abandoned (at
Arahanthood). The Buddha compared Buddha Dhamma to a raft that one uses to cross river.
Once the river is crossed, there is no point in carrying the raft on one’s back. So, even Buddha
Dhamma is of value only until one reaches Nibbāna.
§ Only Nibbāna, which is attained by “giving up EVERYTHING in this material world” is atta
or “of value”; see, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?” and “Dasa Akusala and Anatta –
The Critical Link.”
3.1.5 Kamma are Done with Saṅkhāra – Types of Saṅkhāra
This replaces an old post in this section entitled, “Saṅkhāra and Kammā, Viññāṇa and Kamma
Beeja”. I have re-written it with a new title.
Origin of the Words Saṅkhāra and Sansāra
1. All kamma are done with saṅkhāra. However, only abhisaṅkhāra lead to strong kamma that can
fuel the rebirth process.
§ It is important to realize that saṅkhāra involves EVERYTHING that we do, to live in “this world”
of 31 realms. These include breathing, walking, eating, pretty much everything we do; see,
“Complexity of the Mind – Viññāṇa and Saṅkhāra“.
§ Anything anyone does, need to start as a thought in one’s mind. For example, to lift a leg, one’s
mind needs to decide on that first, even though it appears automatic. Anything one does, starts with
a thought of “san“, i.e., something to do with “this world”; see “San” and “List of “San” Words and
Other Pāli Roots“. All these belong to saṅkhāra (“san” + “khāra” or action).
§ Even an Arahant has to be engaged in saṅkhāra until Parinibbāna or death of the physical body.
2. Saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra when acting with greed, hate, and ignorance; see, “Nibbāna –
Is it Difficult to Understand?“.
§ The sansāric process or the rebirth process is fueled by abhisaṅkhāra. The prefix “abhi”
means “strong”.
§ An Arahant does not generate abhisaṅkhāra, i.e., thoughts with greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ It must be noted that an Arahant would not generate puññābhisaṅkhāra (puñña abhisaṅkhāra)
but can do puñña kriya; see, “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Puñña and Pāpa Kamma“.
§ Kriya basically means “actions” or “deeds” without the involvement of greed, hate, and
ignorance.
§ One’s puññābhisaṅkhāra turn to puñña kriya when one fully comprehends Tilakkhaṇa (anicca,
dukkha, anatta).
3. Therefore, the sansāric process — or the rebirth process — is fueled by abhisaṅkhāra.
§ The word sansāra comes from “san” + “sāra” where “sāra” means “beneficial”; see, “What
is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“”.
§ One will have the perception that “this world is beneficial or fruitful” as long as one cannot
grasp the fact that most births in the this world are filled with suffering.
§ Even though some realms (like human, deva, and brahma) may have long stretches of
“pleasures”, those are negligible compared to long stretches of suffering in the apāyās (the four
lower realms including the animal realm).
§ Sansāric process is fueled by (abhi)saṅkhāra. This is why an Arahant will not be reborn in the
31 realms of this world. He/she would not generate abhisaṅkhāra.
Connection Between Saṅkhāra and Kammā
4. Kammā is any action by us via body, speech, and thoughts (kāya, vacī, and mano kammā). Those
three types of kammā are initiated by our thoughts, i.e., kāya, vacī, and mano saṅkhāra.
§ We can see that kammā and saṅkhāra are closely related.
§ The Buddha said, “cetanāhaṃ, bhikkhave, kammaṃ vadāmi”, i.e., “Bhikkhus, I say kammā is
intention”. [WebLink: suttacentral: AN 6.63. Nibbedhikasutta] That intention is in saṅkhāra,
embedded in the types of cetasika (mental factors) as we will see below.
§ “Intention” depends on the types of cetasika in a thought (citta). For example, in a thought with
“greedy intention”, will have the lobha cetasika, but it may also have issa (jealousy) cetasika.
5. Let us take some examples to illustrate this relationship. If you swing your arm, that is a kāya
kammā, i.e., that action involved moving a body part. That corresponded to kāya saṅkhāra generated
in the mind.
§ Now, if you swung your arm to get hold of a cup, that is a kammically neutral action (kammā)
or a just a saṅkhāra. You did not do either a moral or immoral act. The intention was to grab a
cup, and that did not involve any sobhana or asobhana cetasika. That is called a kiriya (kriyā
in Sanskrit). [kiriya :[nt.] action; deed; performance.]
§ On the other hand, if you swung your arm to hit someone, then it was done with anger. So, the
dosa cetasika (an asobhana cetasika) was in your thoughts. So, it was an apuññābhi saṅkhāra.
It can also be called a akusala/apuñña kammā or an immoral deed.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
104 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ If you put your arms together to pay respects to the Buddha at a temple, that was done with
saddhā cetasika (a sobhana cetasika) and thus it was a puññābhisaṅkhāra. It can be also called
a kusala/puñña kammā or a moral deed.
6. Now we can see that all kamma involve the mind; they are initiated by saṅkhāra.
§ Mano saṅkhāra are thoughts that comes automatically to the mind when a sense object is
experienced.
§ Then if that object is of interest, we start generating conscious thoughts (speaking to ourselves)
without talking and then we may speak out; both these are vacī saṅkhāra.
§ If we then start moving body parts to respond, then those are done with kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Also see, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means” and “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
7. Thus it is important to note that kāya saṅkhāra are also thoughts. They are responsible for body
movements, i.e., kāya kammā. They are also responsible for making “bodily gestures” or “kāya
viññatti“.
§ In other words, all saṅkhāra are generated by the mental body (gandhabba). It gives commands
to the brain to move body parts or to move lips and tongue to speak; see, “Our Mental Body –
Gandhabba” and other posts on gandhabba.
§ Furthermore, kāya kammā, vacī kammā, and mano kammā are all done by the respective types
of saṅkhāra: kāya, vacī, and mano saṅkhāra.
§ More information on these terms can be found at, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma
Vipāka“.
Saṅkhāra and Kammā Can be Good or Bad
8. Therefore, saṅkhāra can be understood in a deeper sense by realizing that types of saṅkhāra
generated are defined by the types of cetasika (mental factors) in one’s thoughts.
§ Some citta (thoughts) do not have either good (sobhana) cetasika or bad (asobhana) cetasika.
Such citta are said to have kammically neutral saṅkhāra. These kammically neutral saṅkhāra
involve only the types of cetasika like vedanā, saññā, viriya that do not belong to either
sobhana or asobhana categories.
§ Kammically relevant saṅkhāra (or abhisaṅkhāra) involve either sobhana cetasika (for kusala
kammā) or asobhana cetasika (for akusala kammā).
§ Therefore, it is easy to see that abhisaṅkhāra that involve sobhana cetasika are puñña
abhisaṅkhāra or puññābhisaṅkhāra. Those that involve asobhana cetasika are
apuññābhisaṅkhāra; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.
9. Knowing a bit of Abhidhamma can be helpful in clarifying certain key dhamma concepts. It is not
hard to learn. Since Abhidhamma was finalized after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha (see,
“Abhidhamma – Introduction“), these details are not in the Suttās.
§ Now we can get a new perspective for cetasika, in terms of “san“. As we know, “san” is what
keep us in the rebirth process or sansāra; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or
Saṃsāra)“.
§ We can see that those asobhana cetasika are what give rise to “san” in apuññābhi saṅkhāra,
that lead to rebirth in the bad realms.
§ On the other hand, sobhana cetasika are what give rise to “san” in puññābhi saṅkhāra, that lead
to rebirth in the good realms.
Do We Need to Avoid Good Saṅkhāra (Puñña Abhisaṅkhāra)?
10. However, this does not mean we should stay away from puññābhi saṅkhāra. In fact, we MUST
engage in puññābhi saṅkhāra, in order to avoid rebirth in the bad realms and also to cultivate
morality and also to prepare the necessary environment (especially to be healthy and to avoid
poverty).
§ The Buddha has emphasized the need to engage in meritorious deeds (puññābhi saṅkhāra) in
many Suttās; see, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral: Sumana Sutta (AN 5.31)“.
§ Nibbāna is attained via realizing the fruitlessness in rebirth anywhere in the 31 realms, and for
that one needs to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta, and for that one needs to attain the
correct mindset by engaging in puñña kammā (puññābhi saṅkhāra).
§ Once one FULLY comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta (i.e., when one becomes an Arahant),
one’s puññābhi saṅkhāra will turn into puñña kriyā. This is a subtle point.
Puññābhisaṅkhāra Are Also Done With Avijjā
11. In WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga, the term “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” in
akusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda (that leads to suffering) is explained as follows: “Tattha katame
avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā? Puññābhisaṅkhāro, apuññābhisaṅkhāro, āneñjābhisaṅkhāro,
kāyasaṅkhāro, vacīsaṅkhāro, cittasaṅkhāro“.
Translated: “What is avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā? Puññābhisaṅkhāra, apuññābhisaṅkhāra,
āneñjābhisaṅkhāra, kāyasaṅkhāra, vacīsaṅkhāra, cittasaṅkhāra“. (here, cittasaṅkhāra is the same as
manosaṅkhāra).
§ It needs to be noted that these are all abhisaṅkhāra, even though the verse is simplified as
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā“.
§ There are two categories of saṅkhāra mentioned there: one category refers to types of kamma
accrued. The other refers to whether they are done by the body, speech, or the mind.
§ Therefore, saṅkhāra has a much deeper meaning than just “mental formations”, even though
that is better than the translation for viññāṇa as consciousness.
Instead of Puññābhisaṅkhāra an Arahant will do Puñña Kiriyā
12. A question may arise how puññābhisaṅkhāra (or meritorious thoughts) arise with avijjā.
§ A simple answer is that until one FULLY comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta (i.e., that
anywhere in this world of 31 realms is not devoid of suffering), one does even meritorious
deeds with expectation of “good outcomes/ good rebirths” in this world.
13. Once one FULLY comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta (i.e., when one becomes an Arahant),
one’s puññābhi saṅkhāra will turn into puñña kiriyā without kammic consequences. Thus one
will do meritorious deeds without any expectations (this is what is meant by “viññāṇa nirodha”
too).
§ Then those meritorious actions will not lead to rebirth even in the “good realms”. An Arahant
does not wish to be reborn in any realm, because he/she has seen the “anicca nature” of all 31
realms. This is a subtle point.
§ This last part may not be clear to everyone. This is the “previously unheard Dhamma” that is
hard to grasp (“pubbe ananussutesu dhammesu” that the Buddha mentioned in the
Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta).
3.2 Nibbāna
1. Elsewhere on the site, I have described Nibbāna in a deeper sense. But we can look at early stages
of Nibbāna in a simple way.
§ In Sinhala language (spoken in Sri Lanka), Nibbāna is also called “nivana” or
“niveema” (නිවීම). This means “cooling down”. As one move towards Nibbāna one feels
cooling down, a sense of well-being.
2. Do you remember the last time when you got really mad? How did that feel? You get hot. Whole
body becomes hot and agitated; blood pressure goes up; face becomes dark, because the blood
becomes dark (By the way, this is clear evidence that the mind can affect the body)..
§ This “burning up” is called “tāpa” in Pāli (තාප in Sinhala), and is due to greed, hate, and
ignorance. “Ātāpi” means the opposite, “cooling down via getting rid of those defilements”.
This is what is meant by “ātāpi sampajāno” in the Satipaṭṭhāna sutta; see, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta“.
§ When someone can get to the “ātāpi sampajāno” state, one feels calm and “cooled down”; see,
“Kāyānupassanā – The Section on Habits (Sampajānapabba)“..
3. Do you remember how you felt when you made someone happy, either via a good deed or word?
You cooled down; felt good. Didn’t you feel the opposite of when you got mad?
§ When one acts with greed, “heating up” still happens, may be to a lesser extent than when one
is angry. As a kid, when I was stealing something, I felt heated and uncomfortable.
§ Same is true when one acts with ignorance too. One is not certain whether that is the right thing
to do; the mind goes back and forth: is this right or wrong? should I do it or not? This is called
“vicikicchā” in Pāli. Because one does not really know, one is not certain, one becomes
anxious, and the body gets heated up.
4. Thus, when one gives up acting with hate, greed, or ignorance, one becomes less agitated, at ease,
with a sense of peacefulness. This is an early sense of what Nibbāna is.
§ As one can see the benefits of cooling down, one will avoid actions done with hate, greed, and
ignorance. And one will be looking forward to do actions of goodwill, generosity, and with
mindfulness.
§ Avoiding greed, hate, and ignorance is the same as avoiding dasa akusala.
5. Also note the state of thoughts (citta) in the two opposing situations. When one acts with the
defilements, thoughts run wildly; they come fast and they are energetic. The “javana” (impulsive
power) of a thought is high when when acting with a defilement.
§ On the other hand, thoughts run more smoothly and the javana (impulsive power) of a given
thought is calm when acting benevolently, with kindness, with generosity, and with
mindfulness; they are powerful too, but only in making one calm. Thus one can experience a
taste of Nibbāna or “cooling down” even at the very early stages of the Path.
6. Now, one could get to TEMPORARY cooling down by not letting thoughts run wildly. The easiest
to do is to keep the mind on a single focus. This can be done by focusing the mind on a religious
symbol or just on the breath. Thus this “temporary relief” is felt by people of any religion when they
contemplate on a religious symbol with faith, or by doing “breath meditation” or mundane “ānāpāna
sati” meditation.
§ However, the only way to achieve permanent sense relief is to REMOVE greed, hate, and
ignorance gradually by cleansing one’s mind. This is done by “taking in” (āna) of good
thoughts, speech, and actions and “getting rid of” (pāna) defiled thoughts, speech, and actions.
This is the Buddha’s ānāpāna meditation that can lead to PERMANENT happiness.
§When one does this correct “ānāpāna” consistently, one’s bad habits (“gathi“) will be gradually
removed and good habits (“gathi“) will be cultivated.
§ When one has removed the defilements to a significant extent, then this relief becomes
permanent and will not reduce from that state even in future births. This first stage of Nibbāna
is called the Sotāpanna stage. A Sotāpanna is guaranteed not to be reborn in the apāyas or the
four lowest realms; he/she has removed all “gathi” suitable for beings in the apāyas.
7. However, it is impossible to remove greed and hate just by sheer will power, i.e., forcefully.
For example, one cannot get rid of greed even by giving away one’s wealth; if that is done without
understanding, then it could lead to remorse and hate.
§ Rather, getting rid of greed and hate comes AUTOMATICALLY as one understands the
worldview of the Buddha: that we cannot maintain anything to our satisfaction in the LONG
RUN. This worldview is embedded in the Three Characteristics of “this world” or anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ Not knowing the Three Characteristics is the ignorance or avijjā.
§ Even before comprehending the Three Characteristics, one needs to reduce total ignorance
(moha) to the avijjā level by getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi,
Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
8. This is why Sammā Diṭṭhi or “correct world view” comes first in the Noble Eightfold Path. When
one comprehends the true nature of “this world”, one’s mind will AUTOMATICALLY start rejecting
thoughts, words, and actions through greed and hate.
§ Then Sammā Diṭṭhi (correct vision) will automatically lead to Sammā Sankappa (fruitful
thoughts), Sammā Vaca (fruitful speech), Sammā Kammanta (fruitful actions), Sammā Ajiva
(livelihood), Sammā Vayama (efforts in those), Sammā Sati (moral mindset) and then will
culminate in Sammā Samādhi (peaceful state of mind). This Sammā Samādhi is permanent for a
Sotāpanna.
§ Thus it is clear that such a samādhi cannot be attained with breath meditation or any other way
of “focusing attention” on one thought object.
§ Purification of the mind is the key, and that comes first through reading, listening, and
comprehending the true and pure Dhamma.
9. As one follows the Noble Eightfold Path of the Buddha, one can EXPERIENCE a sense of well-
being called nirāmisa sukha which is different from the sense pleasures; see, “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ If you did experience a sense of well-being just by reading this post, that is a good start. That
sense of well being will only grow as the understanding gets deeper. I have gone through this
process myself and that is what I am trying to convey to others.
10. September 22, 2016: I have started a new section: “Living Dhamma“, where an experience-based
process of practicing Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) is discussed with English discourses (desanās).
Nibbāna can be experienced at various levels, one needs to experience the earlier stages of nirāmisa
sukha first.
Next, “Need to Experience Suffering in Order to Understand it?“, ..
Deeper analysis of Nibbāna at “Nibbāna“.
3.2.2 Nirāmisa Sukha
1. Another critically important aspect of Buddha’s teachings that has been lost, is the importance of
the nirāmisa sukha. There is happiness in giving up sense pleasures, giving up hate, and giving up
ignorance (by learning Dhamma), and that is called nirāmisa sukha. This is a part of Dhamma that
many people do not realize.
2. Contrary to another misguided perception we have today, the Buddha never said that there is no
āmisa sukha (sense pleasure) to be had. The only reason why people cling to this world is BECAUSE
of the sense pleasures that are available.
§ What the Buddha said is that such sense pleasures are transient, not lasting. Even if one inherits
a fortune and lives in luxury the whole life, the suffering is inevitable in the next life or next
lives. The real suffering (dukkha) is in the four lowest realms (apāyas).
§ Nirāmisa sukha is present where there is no suffering.
§ It can be compared to the relief one gets if one had been suffering from a chronic headache all
through one’s life if it went away at some point.
§ In a way, we are all living with a baseline “chronic headache” that we don’t even realize. We
have gotten used to it, and don’t even realize that there is a “better state”. Only when one starts
feelings the “reduced stress” of nirāmisa sukha, one realizes that. That is the real inspiration for
trying to attain the higher stages of Nibbāna.
3. The nirāmisa sukha has a different quality compared to āmisa sukha or the pleasures from the
senses that we all enjoy. It is also different from the jhānic pleasures in quality. Jhānic pleasure is
better than the sense pleasures (as the meditators know), and nirāmisa sukha is of even better quality.
§ Both āmisa sukha and jhānic pleasures are transient, not lasting.
§ The nirāmisa sukha starts increasing as soon as one starts on the Noble Eightfold Path, and
becomes permanent at the Arahant stage. Furthermore this whole progression up to the Arahant
stage can be attained in this very life.
4. It is important to realize that nirāmisa sukha cannot be attained by “just giving up things” or by
leaving everything behind and going to seclusion. This is another misconception that many people
have.
§ The Buddha never asked anyone to give up their lifestyle. There were wealthy people and even
kings who attained the Sotāpanna stage and up to the Anāgāmī stage while living a
“householder life”.
§ There is no point in giving up everything; even when one gives to charity, one needs to make
sure one has enough left for oneself and one’s family. Fulfilling one’s responsibilities is as
important as being charitable.
5. The “giving up worldly things” needs to come through true understanding of the real nature of
“this world”. Many people did give up worldly things and became bhikkhus, but only after they saw
the fruitless of craving for worldly things.
6. It is the nature of the mind that it has to see the benefit or pleasure of something before embracing
it.
§ One may force the mind to “give up” some sense pleasures, but that cannot be sustained. Most
people who try to do that out of ignorance (misunderstanding of Dhamma) actually end up
becoming dissatisfied and giving up the effort.
§ The mind has to “see” that there is a better option compared to the āmisa sukha or sense
pleasures. When one starts on the Path and start living a moral life one will gradually see the
nirāmisa sukha emerge.
7. The Buddha gave a simile to explain this effect. In the old days, when people took to the oceans to
look for new lands, they took caged birds with them. When they were lost or wanted to find whether
they were close to land, they released a bird. The bird would fly around and come back to ship if no
land is found.
§ The same is true for the mind. It will not latch on to something new (nirāmisa sukha) unless it
is better than the one it already has (āmisa sukha).
§ As the reader Siebe points out (June 30, 2018), the points in #6, #7 are discussed in the
“WebLink: Cūḷadukkhakkhandha Sutta (MN 14)“. A reasonable translation at: “WebLink: 14.
Lesser Discourse on the Stems of Anguish“.
8. Yet, in the beginning it takes some time for the nirāmisa sukha to be noticeable. We have lived
with clouded minds for so long, that it takes a little while to “clean things up”.
§ It is like developing a new technology these days. Initially it is difficult to get started; one has
to make a concerted effort just to “stay in”. But once the benefits of the technology is realized
by the public, it starts to take off: WebLink: WIKI: Technology life cycle
§ But unlike a new technology, once the nirāmisa sukha starts increasing it never comes down
ever (after the Sotāpanna stage is reached).
§ It makes “quantum jumps” (instantaneous big changes) at the Sotāpanna stage and other three
subsequent stages, and becomes complete and permanent at the Arahant stage. However, even
an Arahant will experience the results of previous kamma vipāka and will have PHYSICAL
ailments that will still cause suffering until the life comes to an end.
9. The difference between āmisa and nirāmisa sukha is explained in the “WebLink: suttacentral:
Nirāmisa Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 36.31)“.
§ The “WebLink: suttacentral: English translation” and the “WebLink: suttacentral: Sinhala
translation” — as well as translations in several other languages — are also available at the
Sutta Central site. That is the case for most suttas, so it is a useful resource.
§ However, one needs to keep in mind that many key Pāli words are translated incorrectly
there, including anicca as impermanence and anatta as “no-self”.
Next, “What are Rūpa? Relation to Nibbāna“, ……….
3.2.3 Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?
Revised December 6, 2016 (#9); Re-revised December 20, 2016; November 22, 2018; January 3,
2019
Our distresses and sufferings are due to our defiled minds. As one purifies one’s mind, one starts
experiencing Nibbāna.
§ I advise reading through any post one time without clicking on the links first; once you get the
main concept, then the links can be used to clarify the other related key concepts.
§ Nibbāna may not be easy to attain, but it is easy to figure out what it is. You don’t need
complex concepts like emptiness (sunyātā) and Bodhi citta to describe or to understand
Nibbāna.
1. The Buddha said we suffer because of the defilements we have in our minds: greed, hate,
ignorance, and other mental qualities that arise from them. Nibbāna has many synonyms, and
“Nivana” (“cooling down”) is one that conveys the above idea better; Nivana , which is also called
“niveema“ (නිවීම) in Sinhala, conveys the same idea as nirāmisa sukha.
§ As one moves away from hate, greed, and ignorance, one can feel oneself “cooling down”
INSIDE. Nibbāna (“Nib“+”bāna“, where “bāna” means bonds) and thus Nibbāna means break
free of bonds that makes one bound to the 31 realms.
§ I like the word Nivana or niveema, because it conveys the benefits of the Path as one
experiences gradual “cooling down” until it becomes complete at Nibbāna; see,“Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“, “How to Taste Nibbāna“, and “Learning Buddha
Dhamma Leads to Nirāmisa Sukha“.
2. In order to “cool down”, we first need to know what is “burning” (“thāpa” in Pāli); our minds are
constantly burning due to greed, hate, and ignorance, and we don’t even realize this; see the “Living
Dhamma” section and specifically the post, “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This
Life“.
§ This “burning” is really worse in the lowest four realms or the “apāyas“. Thus one really needs
to understand the first Noble Truth about suffering, in order to realize the value of Nibbāna.
There are several posts at various levels on the real, deeper meaning of what the Buddha meant
by “suffering in this world of 31 realms”.
§ Our sufferings are masked by the apparent sense pleasures, which do not last. A Sotāpanna
understands suffering better than a normal person, and as one gets to higher stages of Nibbāna
one will be able to see the meaning of the First Noble Truth even more clearly.
3. The key point is that one CAN start feeling “nivana” RIGHT NOW. Nivana is experienced by
giving up the ten defilements (see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“). One does not have to get
rid of all of them at once, and that is not advised either. One should get rid of the BIGGEST ones that
can be easily gotten rid of.
§ Killing, stealing, lying (and gossiping, slandering, verbally abusing), engaging in sexual
misconduct, and being intoxicated (not just with alcohol or drugs, but also with wealth, power,
etc.) are the first to be considered.
§ Just abandon the relatively easy ones first for a few weeks and experience the “nivana“, the
ease of mind, the “inner peace”, that comes from that. That is the biggest incentive to continue
on the Path.
4. One needs to understand the relative weights associated with dealing with animals and humans,
and also there are different levels among the humans. For example, it is very difficult to be born
human; thus even saying a hurtful thing to a human (especially to an Ariya or a Noble One), could
have thousand-fold kammic weight compared to killing an animal; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of
Different Kamma“.
§ Another key concept is that one does NOT need to worry about the past kamma. The role of
kamma has been exaggerated; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
Nibbāna is not attained via removal of kamma, but removal of āsavas or cravings; see, “The
Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“.
§ The main thing is not to repeat the same mistakes. The more one stays away from the ten
defilements, it automatically BECOMES easier. It is like pushing a stalled car: initially hard,
but becomes easier when it starts moving.
5. Nibbāna is NOT removing everything from the mind, just removing the defilements: Nibbāna
is rāgakkhaya ( greed elimination), Nibbāna is dosakkhaya (hate elimination), Nibbāna is
mohakkhaya (delusion elimination); those three are more synonyms for Nibbāna.
§ Thus one sees Nibbāna with a thought (citta, pronounced chittha; see, “Pāli Glossary and
Pronounciation“) that is devoid of rāga (greed), dosa (hate), moha (delusion). This PURE
MIND does not want to be burdened with a “material existence” anywhere in the 31 realms;
see, “What are Rūpa? Relation to Nibbāna“.
6. The suffering is a direct result of having a “material aspect” associated with the mind: that material
body is subject to decay and death. The mind gets associated with a body that it gets “attached”
to with greed, hate, and ignorance. If you look at the 31 realms of “this world” (see, “The Grand
Unified Theory of Dhamma“):
§ It is clear that suffering is there in the lowest five realms — including the human realm —
where all three (greed, hate, ignorance) can be present; the bodies of beings in these realms are,
in general, dense and are subject to decay and diseases. Of course there is unimaginable
suffering in the lowest four realms.
§ However, human realm (#5) is unique, because one COULD attain Nibbāna as a human, even
though they are also subject to bodily pains, decay, and diseases.
§ In the Deva lokas (realms 6-11), hate is not there and suffering is less. And the bodies of devas
are less dense and not subject to physical ailments (until death of course).
§ In the Brahma lokas (realms 12-31), both hate and greed are absent, and suffering is even less;
they have very fine bodies and no physical ailments.
7. However, since ignorance is there in all 31 realms, complete, absolute state of happiness is absent
anywhere in the 31 realms. Even if one is born in a deva or Brahma world, one will eventually end up
in the lowest four realms (unless one has attained the Sotāpanna or a higher stage of Nibbāna).
§ The suffering is of course unimaginably intense in the lower realms.
§ This is the key message of the Buddha: He said that suffering never ends as long as one
keeps coming back to “this world of 31 realms” when one dies (i.e., unless one attains
Nibbāna) ;
§ Suffering totally ends with the death of an Arahant; no more births in this world of 31 realms.
§ However, one could get deppressed by thinking that Arahanthood is “annihilation”; but that is
not true. One just needs to follow the Path step-by-step; see, “Is It Necessary for a Buddhist to
Eliminate Sensual Desires?” and “Mahā Cattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
8. Therefore, one could visualize a gradual decrease of suffering as one gets rid of hate, greed, and
ignorance in that order.
§ And one CAN experience this happiness called nirāmisa sukha in this human life itself, all the
way up to Nibbāna; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha“. That is the
uniqueness of a human birth.
9. When the mind “starts thinking” about a given thought object (arammana), say a visual object, it
starts as “just seeing”; this is the citta stage. But within a fraction of a second, the mind starts adding
defilements (based on greed, hate, ignorance), if that object is “of interest”.
§ It develops further thoughts defiled by greed, hate, ignorance (possibly a combination) by going
around and around that thought object and ends up in the “defiled thought” (viññāṇa) stage
even before one realizes it; see, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
§ This is also described in paṭicca samuppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati + ichcha” +
“Sama + uppada“, and the links below that. Viññāna is a citta that is defiled by rāga (greed),
dosa (hatred), moha (ignorance).
§ Paṭicca samuppāda, which is Buddha Dhamma, is discussed in detail in the series, “Paṭicca
Samuppāda in Plain English“.
10. When rāga, dosa, and moha are removed from the mind, cittas become pabhasvara (bright); there
is no more defilements there clouding the cittas. At this stage, it is said that the pure citta “sees
Nibbāna”.
§ After one attains Nibbāna with one citta, the cittas fall back to the “normal state” and the
person lives like a normal human (but without doing anything with greed, hate, and ignorance)
until the kammic energy of the kamma seed that started the present life is exhausted.
§ At death (called Parinibbāna), the mind of an Arahant does not grab (upādāna) another kamma
seed (even if there may be many kamma seeds), and thus there is no further rebirth. The mind
becomes free of a “body” that can be subjected to decay and death. That is Nibbāna or
“complete Nivana” or “complete cooling down”.
11. We are bound to this rebirth process basically due to two causes: avijjā and taṇhā. First version of
taṇhā is lobha, the strong greed, which could easily turn to dosa (strong hate) when someone else
gets in the way. Thus those two causes of avijjā and taṇhā effectively become three: lobha, dosa,
moha.
§ Even though dosa arises due to lobha, dosa brings about the worst vipāka: rebirth in the niraya
(hell), where the suffering is optimum. Thus dosa actually has origins in the 4 greed-based
“somanassa sahagata, diṭṭhi sampayutta citta“.
§ When diṭṭhi is removed at the Sotāpanna stage, all four of these greed-based citta stop arising.
Thus at that stage, lobha and dosa become rāga and paṭigha, which are removed successively
at the Sakadāgāmī and Anāgāmī stages. Avijjā keeps reducing at each stage of Nibbāna, and is
removed at the Arahant stage.
12. When the mind is devoid of rāga, dosa, and moha, the mind (and thus cittas) become devoid
(sunya) of them; that is the purified state of a citta, anidassana viññāṇa (consciousness devoid of
defilements) or paññā (wisdom).
§ The forefathers of Mahayana Buddhism could not grasp the concept of Nibbāna, so they came
up with misleading descriptions including that of Sunyata: see, “What is Sunyata or Sunnata
(Emptiness)?“.
§ Even among the current Theravāda Buddhists, there are many debates about what is meant by
Nibbāna. That is sad to see.
13. When rāga, dosa, moha are removed, a citta stops going around and around a given thought
object (arammana). This “wheeling” is what fuels the sansāric journey. Thus stopping this process
is called “taking off the wheels of the sansāric vehicle”.
§ The Pāli (and Sinhala) word for vehicle is “riya”, and stopping of the “riya” is called “Ariya”;
one who has taken the wheels off the vehicle for the sansāric journey is called an “Ariya”. Thus
contrary to popular usage, “Arya” is not the word for a Noble Person, it is Ariya.
§ Therefore, it is clear that “Ariya” has nothing to do with a race, “Arya”.
§ Furthermore, “viriya” (“vi” + “riya“) means staying away from the “wheeling process” (and the effort to do
so). Therefore, viriya really means actively engaging in Satipaṭṭhāna and Ānāpānasati; see,
“Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life“.
14. Anyone who has at least attained the first stage of Nibbāna, i.e., Sotāpanna, can be called an
Ariya, or a Noble Person. This is because the “āsavas” or deep-seated cravings that a Sotāpanna has
removed stay permanently removed even in any future lives.
§ All the āsavas are removed at Nibbāna; thus “Āsavakkhaya” (elimination of āsavas) is another
synonym for Nibbāna. People who had been in the lowest social ladder or lowest caste at the
time of the Buddha were able to became Ariyas or Noble Persons.
15. When one sees Nibbāna, one’s mind does not crave for anything “in this world” of 31 realms.
There is nothing for the last citta (cuti citta, pronounced “chuthi chittha”) of this life (at death) to
grab (nothing to upādāna) and to start a new birth in “this world”, and the mind becomes totally free.
§ The mind become PERMANENTLY pure and be detached permanently from any type of
physical body, dense or fine.
16. Thus an Arahant will not be reborn in “this material world” of 31 realms (see “The Grand Unified
Theory of Dhamma”), i.e., one attains Parinibbāna. He/she is simply “gone” from “this world” of 31
realms. The suffering stops permanently.
§ Thus it is quite clear WHAT Nibbāna is: it is the stopping of the rebirth process in the material
world. What is hard to understand is WHY stopping the rebirth process can relieve one of all
suffering.
§ No matter how much hardship one has endured, one likes to live. This is true for a human or a
lowly worm. For any living being, the most precious thing is life. When one starts
understanding the “big picture of the Buddha”, one will slowly start seeing the dangers of
staying in this endless rebirth process.
Other analyses of Nibbāna can be found at, “Nirodha and Vaya – Two Different Concepts” and
“Difference Between Giving up Valuables and Losing Interest in Worthless“, …………
Continue to “What is San?“…..
3.2.4 The Four Stages in Attaining Nibbāna
1. The 31 realms discussed in “31 Realms Associated with the Earth” are divided into three main
categories based on the sense faculties and the level of suffering:
§ The lowest eleven realms belong to the “kāma loka”, where all five physical sense faculties are
present; “kāma” is the indulging in the five sense faculties.
§ Beings in the next sixteen realms have only two physical senses: vision and hearing. They have
less-dense bodies, and this subset of realms is called the rūpa loka. In rūpa loka there is mainly
jhānic pleasures corresponding to the first four mundane jhānas that are achievable by humans.
There is relatively less suffering in the rūpa lokas.
§ The highest four realms correspond to the higher arūpa jhānic states (jhānic levels five through
eight) that are also attainable in the human realm. Thus there is mainly jhānic bliss in these
realms, and relatively less suffering. These realms are commonly known as arūpa loka, because
the beings have very fine bodies with no physical senses and only the mind.
2. The lifetimes of the beings in the rūpa loka are very long, and those in the arūpa loka are even
longer. Lifetime in the highest arūpa lokas are so long (84,000 eons or mahā kalpas), that it is
beyond comprehension to us.
§ This is why the ancient yogis mistakenly thought that such realms correspond to Nibbāna. But
the Buddha (or rather Sidharata Gotama), who attained the eighth jhāna within months after
leaving the palace to become an ascetic, realized that this realm is also subjected to the transient
existence, i.e., does not correspond to permanent happiness. Also, even this long time is
insignificant in the saṃsāric time scale (see, “Saṃsāric Time Scale“), which is infinite (see,
“Infinity – How Big Is It?“).
3. One in the human realm can experience the jhānic pleasure of both rūpa and arūpa lokas by
attaining such jhānic states via samatha meditation.
§ Furthermore, it is possible to gain access to both rūpa lokas and arūpa lokas in the next birth by
developing the corresponding jhānas and by being in a jhānic state at death. As I understand,
this is the goal of most Hindu practices.
4. What the Buddha pointed out was that even the highest jhānic state is impermanent, and once that
kammic energy is exhausted, it is possible to be born in any of the 31 realms. In fact, unless the
being had not attained at least the Sotāpanna stage, it is guaranteed that at some point in the
future rebirth in one of the lowest realms is inevitable.
§ He said that many of the beings still in the rebirth process (saṃsāra), i.e., we all, are likely to
have been born in the higher arūpa lokas, as well as the lowest realm (niraya) in the past. The
saṃsāra is that long.
5. From this discussion it is clear that the actual suffering is mostly in the kamalokas. But the problem
is that beings spend most time in kāma lokas in their beginning-less journey in the saṃsāra.
§ The Buddha gave a simile to describe this situation. We leave home only to go on short, or may
be even extended, trips; but we always come back home. The Buddha said that the four
lowest realms (the apāyas) are the home base for most living beings.
1. Suffering in the kāma loka ranges from unfathomable suffering in the lowest realm, the niraya
(hell), to relatively little suffering and highest sense pleasures in the Deva lokas (the highest six
realms in the kāma loka).
§ Just below the deva lokas, there is the human realm with both suffering and sense pleasures at
about equal levels.
§ Below the human realm, there is preta loka (hungry ghosts), asuras, animal realm, and the
nirayas, and the level of suffering generally increases in that order.
2. The lowest four levels in the kāma loka are collectively called the apāyas (the undesirable realms).
More than 99% of the beings are trapped in these four realms. The problem is that once born in
any of those four realms, it is virtually impossible to get out.
§ This is because these realms are such that one is forced to commit apuññabhi saṅkhāra or evil
actions (see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka”) by the very nature of that
existence. For example, in the animal realm, most animals have to kill others for survival. In the
niraya, virtually every thought is of hate, because of the incessant suffering.
§ Still, when we analyze Abhidhamma, we will be able to see that the javana of the cittas are
much less potent for animals, and thus the kammic power of those actions are relatively small
compared to kammic power of such actions by humans. This is an important point that I wish to
discuss in the future.
3. Just as it is likely that we have been born in the higher rūpa lokas in the past, it is even more
certain that we ALL have been in the apāyas. Luckily we do not remember those past lives.
§ But in certain realms (particular the preta realm) beings do remember their past lives and that
increases the level of suffering.
Why We Need to Strive Now
1. From the above discussion it is clear that most suffering is in the four lowest realms, below the
human realm which is the fifth realm. Essentially, there is relatively less suffering above the human
realm, starting with the deva loka which is the highest realm in the kāma loka.
2. Even though the suffering is highest in the lower four realms, the beings there are helpless to do
anything about the suffering. Their limited minds are not capable of grasping the causes that lead to
suffering.
§ Many people wrongly believe that one needs to feel suffering in order to understand it,
and to get an incentive to seek Nibbāna. But when one really suffers (say, when one gets
too old) it is NOT possible to clearly contemplate the deep concepts of Dhamma.
§ The Noble truth on suffering needs to be seen with wisdom (paññā), not via feelings (vedanā),
i.e., by understanding the complete world view AND the Three Characteristics of this “wider
world”: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
3. Beings in the realms above the human realm, the 26 realms starting with the deva realms, do not
even feel much suffering. This is the other extreme; there is no incentive for them to be
concerned about suffering. The only real suffering there is that when their lifetimes get near to the
end, they do realize that and become distraught.
4. Thus it is only at the human realm that one is at least exposed to the suffering, even if one may not
be subjected to much suffering. Furthermore, the human mind is the best suited for grasping the true
nature of “this world of 31 realms”, i.e., the Three Characteristics (see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta”).
This is why the Buddha said that a human should not miss this opportunity to attain Nibbāna.
1. The first stage of Nibbāna, is attained by “seeing” (not just reading about, but actually
grasping) the true nature of the existence: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Thus one needs to first learn from someone (like from this website), the nature of existence
with the 31 realms, the aimless wandering of a being through endless rebirths (saṃsāra), the
reasons for the rebirths, etc.
§ Thus the key areas to understand are the Three Characteristics, the Four Noble Truths, and the
Noble Eightfold Path. No one but a Buddha is capable of finding these and this is why it is
important to have exposure to the PURE DHAMMA.
2. At the first stage (Sotāpanna or Stream Enterer), one partially comprehends the validity of the
Buddha’s world view. This is called attaining Sammā Diṭṭhi (elimination of defilements through clear
vision) to a significant extent. He/she understands the “true nature” of existence: significance and true
meaning of the Three Characteristics of Existence (see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“).
3. The realization that it is not worthwhile or fruitful to stay in any of the 31 realms in the long run,
makes one to conduct oneself in a moral fashion; one’s mind makes the decision that it is not
worthwhile or beneficial to do those actions that destine oneself to birth in the lower four realms.
§ This realization leads to a Sotāpanna phala citta (one thought moment of realizing the
Sotāpanna stage). When that is achieved, one will never again be reborn in the lower four
realms (“free of suffering in the apāyas forever”); why this is so is explained in, “Akusala Citta
– How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“.
4. At this stage one has realized the First Noble Truth of suffering (dukkha), and one earnestly starts
on the Noble Eightfold Path. At this stage he still has greed and hate left in him to some extent, but at
the next stage (Sakadāgāmī), he loses more of the strength of such greedy or hateful thoughts.
§ A Sakadāgāmī is not fully released from the kāma loka since he/she will be born in the deva
loka (but not in the human realm).
§ In the deva loka (and in the brahma realms above that where a Sakadāgāmī can be born
subsequently), the bodies are not subjected to diseases. Thus a Sakadāgāmī is said to be
“healthy forever”.
5. When the third stage of Anāgāmī (Non-Returner) is attained, the mind loses any desire to be born
in the kāma loka. One is not capable of generating any greedy or hateful thoughts belonging to the
kāma loka (one is said to be “happy and peaceful forever”) and he will be born only one time more in
a higher Brahma world reserved for the Anāgāmīs.
6. All through these three stages, avijjā or ignorance gradually diminish. But it is completely
removed only at the Arahant stage.
§ Once the Arahant stage is reached, the mind becomes totally pure (anidassana viññāṇa or
paññā is attained), and is incapable of desiring anything “in this world of 31 realms”. Thus
there is no more rebirth, and one attains the perfect happiness the peak of nirāmisa sukha.
Also, see “Nibbāna - Is it Difficult to Understand” and “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of āsavas“.
Why Living a Moral Life Would Not Prevent a Birth in the Four Lower Realms
1. We desperately cling to “things in this world” because we have the perception that lasting
happiness can be achieved. We crave the sense pleasures. As mentioned before, there is nothing or no
one holding us in this world of 31 realms. We cling to existence in these realms like an octopus
grabbing its prey with all eight legs.
2. Even some Buddhists would, in the back of their minds, like to stay in this world a bit more. They
do not realize the level of happiness associated with the Nibbānic bliss; see, “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ A popular blessing given by some Buddhist monks even today goes like, “May you be reborn in
prosperous (deva or human) realms AND THEN attain Nibbāna”. Even they do not understand
the permanent happiness associated with Nibbāna or the possibility of much suffering even in
the next birth.
3. The danger in such thinking is due to the following reason: We all have done both good and bad
deeds in the lives before and have acquired uncountable kamma seeds both good and bad; see,
“Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka”. At death it is possible for any one of those
seeds to bear fruit: if it is a good kamma seed, one will get a good birth, but if it is a bad kamma
seed one will get a bad birth.
4. Our future births are not necessarily determined by how we live this life, because we have done
uncountable number of both good and bad kamma in previous lives.
§ This is why the Buddha said that even if one lives a perfectly moral life he cannot say that one
will get a good rebirth, UNLESS one has attained at least the Sotāpanna stage: A Sotāpanna
has made ineffective all those bad kamma seeds that could give a birth in the lower four realms.
§ The Buddha also said that even if one lives immorally that also does not necessarily lead to a
bad life in the next birth unless a anantariya kamma (an extremely bad kamma like killing
one’s parents) was committed; however those bad acts will bear fruit at some point in the
future. It is just that there are many good seed as well as bad seeds with any life stream; see,
“What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?” .
§ Thus the goal of this life should be to attain at least the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
A different analysis on Nibbāna can be found at, “Difference Between Giving up Valuables and
Losing Interest in Worthless“, ………
Next, “Nirāmisa Sukha (Happiness Arising from Dissociating from the 31 realms)“, …….
3.2.5 What Are Rūpa? (Relation to Nibbāna)
1. In Buddha Dhamma, everything in “this world” of 31 realms can be put into two categories:
manasa or mano (mind) and rūpa (material form).
§ Mind is citta (thoughts) and the mental properties in the thoughts, cetasika.
§ Everything else is rūpa (material forms).
2. Now let us look at rūpa: Many people think rūpa is just the body or “material things”. A better
translation for rūpa is “matter and energy”. As stated in #1 above, everything else in the 31 realms
that is not citta or cetasika is rūpa.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 117
§ There are five types of rūpa that we experience with our five senses: with eye (cakkhu), we
experience vanna rūpa (whatever that is visible); with ear (sota), we experience sounds (sadda);
with nose (ghāṇa), we experience smells (gandha); with tongue (jivha), we experience taste
(rasa); with body (kaya), we experience touch (pottabba).
3. We can see that smells are due to tiny material particles that enter the nose; taste is also due to food
and drinks that touch the tongue; touch is also contact between “material things”.
§ But what about visible objects? We need light to see any objects; without light we cannot see.
Thus “seeing” involves matter and energy. Same for sound. Thus vanna rūpa (or varna rūpa)
are really “matter and energy”, which in the end is just energy. Since the turn of the 20th
century, science has confirmed that matter is just energy: they are related by Einstein’s
famous formula of E = mc2.
§ It is important to realize that what is meant by “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“, is the light impinging on the eye indriya to give us the sensation of vision.
Thus, in vanna (also called varna or rūpa rūpa), sadda, gandha, rasa, and pottabba (the five
senses), rūpa are really types of energy or particles.
§ Modern science now agrees that there is no distinction between matter and energy. However,
matter/energy is created by the mind (as “dhammā“) and will eventually be destroyed in the
“loka vinasaya” in a supernova type explosion. Therefore, the even the conservation of
matter/energy holds only within the time scales of a Maha kappa; see, “WebLink: Sansāric
Time Scale, Buddhist Cosmology, and the Big Bang Theory“.
4. Thus the rūpa can vary in “density” from almost pure energy to the solid objects that we can see
with our eyes.
§ They go through three stages: At the “gathi” stage, they overlap with energy; in the “bhuta”
stage, they are more solidified but the human eye still cannot see (this is why some beings that
the humans cannot see are called “bhūta” in Pāli or Sinhala); it is only in the “dhathu” stage
that the human eye can see; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
§ At Parinibbāna (death) of an Arahant, the mind is not attached to a rūpa in any of the three
forms: dhathu, bhūta, or gathi.
5. When one is born anywhere in the 31 realms, it is the viññāṇa (impure consciousness) that keeps
the mind bound to a material body. As the purity level of the mind goes higher one moves up from
the lower realms with dense bodies to higher realms with less dense bodies.
§ In the lower realms, the mind is normally attached to a dense body that the human eye can see
(at or below the human realm, which is the fifth realm). This is dense dhatu form.
§ In the deva lokas (realms 6-11), the bodies are finer; their minds are devoid of hate and thus are
more pure. In the realms 1-11, the bodies are made of rūpa still in the “dhatu” form, but less
dense.
§ In the rūpa loka and arūpa loka, the mind is devoid of both hate and greed, and are thus even
more pure. In the rupaloka (realms 12-27), the bodies of the beings are much more less dense
than the devas, and are in the “bhūta” form.
§ In Arūpa lokas (realms 28-31) there are no rūpa even in the sense of bhūta. But the four mahā
bhūta are still associated with those being’s “gathi” (Kevaddha Sutta in Digha Nikāya); there
rūpa can be thought of as indistinguishable from energy.
§ When the mind becomes purified, viññāṇa becomes “anidassana viññāṇa”, which is the
viññāṇa of an Arahant (also called paññā). Here there is no association of the mind with
even fine rūpa associated with “gathi”; the mind is completely detached from rūpa. The mind
becomes pure and free. When one attains Aranthood, one still lives with the “solid body” of a
human being until death. At Parinibbāna, the mind becomes completely free of rūpa.
6. At a deeper level, the anicca nature, i.e., our inability to maintain anything to our satisfaction, is
based on the fact that any rūpa is subjected to not only decay (impermanence), but also to unexpected
change (viparinama nature).
§ This fact is embodied in the Second Law of Thermodynamics; see, “Second Law of
Thermodynamics is Part of Anicca!“.
7. Thus to attain Nibbāna is to attain the perfectly purified mind, which refuses to be burden
with a physical body that leads to decay and rebirth repeatedly (and thus to dukkha).
8. In the 31 realms, one is born with a dense body (kāma loka), fine-material body (rūpa loka), or
only a trace of “matter” in the form of “gathi” (arūpa loka). Nibbāna is attained when the mind
becomes free of a body anywhere in the 31 realms. This is another way to understand Nibbāna.
9. In Buddha Dhamma, any given thing or concept can be looked at from many different angles. They
are all consistent. It is a complete “world view”. Some people think, why do we have to worry about
31 realms, etc., but the world is very complex. Scientists are just beginning to appreciate this
complexity.
§ The amazing fact is that the Buddha discerned all this with his mind, and was able to present it all in a
coherent manner.
10. Please re-read and contemplate on the above. In the long run, it will be very helpful. If you do not
really understand it now, you may be able to understand it later, when you get familiar with other
concepts discussed in other posts. Everything at this site is inter-connected, and it may take some
time to “fill-in-the-blanks”.
More details at, “Nāma & Rūpa to Nāmarūpa“.
3.2.6 Does the First Noble Truth Describe only Suffering?
Revised October 24, 2018; re-written August 5, 2019
§ Of course, the word dukkha appears in most suttas, because that is what Buddha Dhamma is all
about, i.e., removal of suffering.
3. We do not realize that the five aggregates are burdens. We like our bodies and mind-pleasing
objects in the world (rūpakkhandha). We crave for what we experience with the mind (aggregates of
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa).
§ It is evident that there are bouts of happiness everywhere. If everything FELT LIKE suffering,
everyone will be seeking Nibbāna. It is hard for people even to see the real suffering out there.
4. Apparent pleasures mask pain and suffering we experience. In the HUMAN REALM, suffering
and happiness both exist; one can experience both.
§ In the realms higher than the human plane, suffering is relatively much less, and that is why it is
hard for devās to even think about Nibbāna. However, even those devās and Brahmas end up
eventually in the lowest four realms. Of course, each birth in any realm ends with death, and
that is unavoidable as long as one is in the rebirth process.
§ Beings in the lowest four realms (apāyās) are the ones who experience a lot of dukha. Of
course, they have no idea about the Dukkha Sacca. The key point is that each living being
spends a lot of time in the apāyās, compared to other realms in the rebirth process, see, “How
the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
§ That is why the rebirth process is filled with suffering. The good news is, that suffering can be
stopped.
What is the Noble Truth of Dukkha?
5. Let us see how the Buddha described the First Noble Truth on suffering in the Dhamma Cakka
Pavattana Sutta:
“Idaṃ kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkhaṃ ariyasaccaṃ—jātipi dukkhā, jarāpi dukkhā, byādhipi dukkho,
maraṇampi dukkhaṃ, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho, piyehi vippayogo dukkho, yampicchaṃ na labhati
tampi dukkhaṃ—saṃkhittena pañcupādānakkhandhā dukkhā“.
§ Let us go through this “definition” of dukkha step-by-step.
6. In the first part, it says, “jātipi dukkhā, jarāpi dukkhā, byādhipi dukkho, maraṇampi dukkhaṃ..”.
Translated: “birth is suffering (that can be overcome). Getting old is suffering (that can be
overcome). Sickness is suffering (that can be overcome). Death is suffering (that can be overcome)..”.
§ Other than “birth,” the others (getting old, sickness, and death) are clearly associated with
suffering.
§ However, the other three types of inevitable sufferings are attached to every birth.
§ Furthermore, the other three types of sufferings cannot be eliminated without stopping birth,
i.e., the rebirth process.
§ Even though this is easy to see logically, it requires much more contemplation to understand.
7. The Buddha further clarified dukkha in the next verse, where he explicitly said: “appiyehi
sampayogo dukkho, piyehi vippayogo dukkho.” That means, “it brings sorrow to associate with
persons/things one does not like. It also brings sorrow when one has to dissociate from people/things
that one likes”.
§ We all know the truth of this first hand. It is unpleasant to associate with people one does not
like, and also to have a job that one does not like, etc.
§ Of course, the reverse of those is true too: “it brings sorrow when a loved one has to depart, and
it also to lose a job or an object that one likes.”
9. That same concept is in the WebLink: suttacentral: Yadanicca sutta (SN 22.15) as, “yadaniccam
tam dukkham, yam dukkham tadanattā.” That is the abbreviated version of “yad aniccam tam
dukkham, yam dukkham tad anattā.“ Translated: “if something is anicca, dukkha arises, and one
becomes helpless (anatta).”
§ Of course, the verse, “yampicchaṃ na labhati tampi dukkhaṃ” corresponds to just the first part
of that verse: “yad aniccam tam dukkham.”
10. The Buddha never said there is only suffering in this world. It is these bouts of “apparent
happiness” that keeps the real suffering hidden. We always try to look at the bright side, and our
societies also try to “cover-up” most of the pain and suffering that is out there.
§ Both suffering and happiness are out there. The key is to see the pain and suffering masked
in apparent joy.
§ When a fish bites the bait, it sees only a bit of delicious food and does not see the hook, the
string, and the man holding the fishing pole. It is not capable of understanding that “whole
picture,” with the suffering hidden (the hook). In the same way, humans cannot see the pain and
suffering hidden in apparent sense pleasures until a Buddha comes to the world and reveals it.
§ On television, we see mostly glamorous people. Look at what happens to such beautiful people
when they get old: WebLink: RANKER: Celebrities Who Have Aged the Worst.
§ We need to realize that we all will go through such inevitable changes as we get old. No matter
how hard we try, it is not possible to maintain ANYTHING to our satisfaction in the LONG-
TERM.
§ Furthermore, there is both suffering and happiness in the broader world of 31 realms. There is
much more happiness in the planes above the human plane (but that happiness is temporary).
And there is unimaginable suffering in the lower four, especially in the lowest one, the hell
(niraya).
The Necessity of the Rebirth Process in Comprehending Anicca
11. The verses discussed in #8 through #10 above describe anicca nature. In the long run “we cannot
maintain things to our satisfaction, and that leads to suffering”; This is “ya da niccam tam dukkaham”
that was discussed in, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations.”
§ Later in the sutta, it says, “……dukkhō anariyō anatta samhitō“. One becomes anatta or
helpless because of that. That is, “tam dukkham tad anatta” part of the verse in #9.
§ In the Anatta Lakkhana Sutta (the second sutta delivered after the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana
sutta), these concepts were further detailed; see, “Anatta – No Refuge in This World.”
§ Anicca, dukkha, anatta are thus the foundational “vision” that can be achieved only by a
Buddha. It is “pubbe ananussutesu dhammesu...” as emphasized at the beginning of the
Dhamma Cakka Pavattana sutta.
12. That is why it is imperative to understand the “big picture” of “this world” with 31 realms, the
process of rebirth, laws of kamma, and most importantly, Paticca samuppāda. Then we realize that
most beings, due to their ignorance, are trapped in the lower four realms.
§ There are only 7 billion or so people on Earth, but each of us carries in/on our bodies millions
of living beings. See, “There are as many creatures on your body as there are people on Earth!“
§ A household may have 4-6 people, but how many living beings are there in that house and in
the yard? Millions, possibly billions. In a single scoop of dirt, there are thousands of tiny
creatures.
13. The concept of dukkha (dukha that can be stopped) is seen only in the context of the rebirth
process. It is all about removing suffering associated with FUTURE births.
§ One’s current life has already started (which is a result of past kamma) and WILL go through
until the kammic energy for the physical body runs out. We can only MANAGE any suffering
associated with sicknesses, injuries, etc. Those are associated with the life that has already
started.
§ However, those future sufferings can be stopped by stopping the rebirth process. That is the
Dukkha Sacca.
Five Aggregates – What We Like to Maintain to Our Satisfaction
14. Finally, the last line of the verse summarizes it all: “saṃkhittena pañcupādānakkhandhā dukkha.”
Translated: “The suffering that can be stopped arises because of the craving for the five aggregates.”
§ What we crave for in this world can be divided into five groups: rūpa, vedanā, saññā,
saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa. We want to maintain our bodies and other inert or live bodies to our
satisfaction. We want to keep our vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa (our thoughts) to our
satisfaction.
§ In other words, what we crave (icca) — and thus have upādāna for — are the five aggregates
(pañcakkhandha). The “portion” of pañcakkhandha that we desire is called
pañcupādānakkhandha (pañca + upādāna + khandha).
15. Therefore, dukha (suffering or the vedanā felt) arises BECAUSE we crave for things in this
world and do “san” to acquire such things.
· Again, we crave rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa, ONLY because we believe those will
bring us happiness. But the reality is that those cravings will inevitably bring suffering as the net
result. We can stop suffering by stopping those cravings via understanding the real nature of this
world, i.e., anicca nature leads to dukkha.
· This truth (dukkha sacca) is realized by cultivating wisdom (paññā), i.e., by comprehending
anicca, dukkha, anatta. Please re-read this until you get the idea. That is the “pubbe
ananussutesu dhammesu…” or the message only a Buddha can discover.
16. Just like the fish does not see the danger in the “tasty worm”, we do not see the suffering hidden
in the apparent pleasures. There is suffering hidden in ALL sense pleasures, but that can be
realized only via stages. At the Sotāpanna stage, one willingly gives up only the intense greed and
strong hate; ALL cravings are removed only at the Arahant stage.
§ The realization of the actual characteristics of nature leads to giving up craving (upādāna due
to taṇhā), which in turn leads to the release from the 31 realms, i.e., Nibbāna.
1. I know of several “Buddhist” groups who try to “stop” thoughts, believing that is what happens at
the Arahant stage of Nibbāna, i.e., they believe that the Buddha spent 45 years of his life trying to
teach people how to stop thoughts, which is an even worse interpretation of Nibbāna than the
Mahayanists.
§ When we are in deep sleep or are unconscious, we do not “think thoughts”. Does that mean we
attain Arahanthood during such times?
§ What the Buddha advised was to stop immoral thoughts, and to ENCOURAGE moral thoughts;
that is how one purifies the mind. This is what one does in the correct ānāpāna meditation too;
see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
§ The reality is that an Arahant‘s thoughts are crystal clear (and pure), because they are devoid of
defilements. Their memory is actually enhanced.
§ Stopping all thoughts can lead to loss of perception and memory.
2. Many misconceptions about Nibbāna arise because the true meanings of some key Pāli words that
the Buddha used are misunderstood. We have discussed how Mahayana forefathers twisted the
concept of sunyata (emptiness) because they could not understand the concept of Nibbāna; see,
“What is Sunyata or Sunnata (Emptiness)?”.
3. There are several key words in Buddha Dhamma that need to be comprehended without even the
slightest change. Most of these misconceptions arise because such key Pāli words are misinterpreted
and also mis-translated. Buddha’s teachings were delivered in Maghadhi language and made to a
form suitable for verbal transmission in the Pāli language (“Pali” means “lined up”). Many times
problems arise when people try to use Sanskrit translations as originals and try to interpret those
Sanskrit words.
4. Three such words are anicca, dukkha, anatta: see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong
Interpretations”. Three more such words are nirodha, khaya, and vaya. In this case the three words
have apparently similar, but very different meanings. Let us look at the origins of these words:
§ Nirodha comes from “nir”+”udaya”, where “nir” means stop and “udaya” means “arise”. Thus
nirodha means stop something from arising. In Buddha Dhamma anything happens due to one
or more causes. Thus if one does not want something to happen, one should remove the causes
for it, and thus stop it from arising.
§ “San” causes anything in this world to arise via “saṅkhāra”; see, “What is “San”? – Meaning
of Saṃsāra”. However, anything that arises is subjected to the natural law of decay; this
“khaya”.
§ “San” and “khaya” go together: As explained in “What is “San”? – Meaning of Saṃsāra”,
“sankhya” in Pāli or Sinhala means numbers, and “san” means adding (or multiplying) thus
contributing to “building or arising” and “khaya” means subtracting (or dividing) and thus
leading to “decay or destruction”.
§ Things that undergo this “arising” and “destruction” are called “saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala)”. Everything in this world is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
5. Anything that arises in this world (a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) starts decaying (“khaya”) from
the moment it starts arising. For example, when a baby is born, all the cells in the baby’s body would
have died in a couple of months, but more cells are born than those died; until that baby becomes a
young person of around twenty years of age, more cells arise in a given time than decayed. Thus the
baby “grows” into a young person, and then things are sort of in balance until about forty years of
age, and then the “khaya” process starts dominating and person slowly starts to get weaker.
Eventually, that person dies or destroyed; this is “vaya”.
§ Once starts arising, a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) cannot be stopped; it needs to undergo its
natural process of growing, come to an apparent stationary state (but not stationary even
momentarily), and eventually is destroyed. If someone commits suicide, this life may end, but
that unspent energy starts a new life right away. Thus all one can do is to stop something from
arising. This stopping of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) via removing its causes is called
“nirodha”.
6. A “saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)” is anything in this world that arises due to “san” and decayed
inevitably (khaya), and is eventually destroyed (vaya). Any living being is a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) and arises due to “san”. We acquire “san” via “saṅkhāra” because we do not comprehend
the true nature of the world (avijjā or ignorance) and thus cling to things in this world with “taṇhā”;
see, “Taṇhā - How we Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance”.
§ We can begin to see with clarity when we get rid of taṇhā and avijjā via removing lobha
(greed), dosa (hatred), and moha (delusion) from our minds gradually; this is also a “khaya”
process for such defilements (“āsava”), where we gradually remove these three defilements
(āsava) from our minds; see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas”. When a mind is
pure (i.e., all āsava are removed), it does not do any saṅkhāra and thus no “saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala)” can arise. At that stage, one has attained “nirodha” of any future “arising”, i.e., one
has attained Nibbāna.
7. Now let us take some famous verses from the Tipiṭaka and see how the meanings come out
naturally, without effort:
§ The third Noble truth is “dukkha nirodha sacca” (here “sacca” is pronounced “sachcha”; sacca
is truth), i.e., that suffering can be stopped from arising. Most people misinterpret “dukkha
nirodha sacca” as “existing suffering can be stopped”. Our current life is a saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala) that was caused by PREVIOUS causes; this life and any associated suffering
CANNOT be stopped, and need to undergo its natural cause until death. That is why an
Arahant (or even a Buddha) feels suffering due to past kamma (old causes).
§ However, an Arahant has stopped FUTURE suffering from arising. This is indicated by
another meaning of nirodha: “ni” + “roda”, where “roda” means wheels; this nirodha also
means “taking the wheels off of the sansāric (rebirth) process”. There is no rebirth with a
physical body that could result in old age, sickness, and death. Thus Nibbāna is removal of the
causes that could lead to future suffering.
8. This is why the Nibbāna is of two kinds: “saupadisesa Nibbāna” and “anupadisesa Nibbāna”.
§ When a person attains Nibbāna, it is called saupadisesa Nibbāna because that person is still “in
this world of 31 realms”; he/she still has a body that needs to undergo its natural destruction;
but one can still experience the Nibbānic bliss by getting into nirodha samapatti for up to 7
days at a time.
§ When that person dies, there is no rebirth and Nibbāna is “complete”; this is called anupadisesa
Nibbāna. Suffering ends permanently.
9. Finally, not absolutely everything in this world of 31 realms is saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) or
saṅkhāra. Absolutely everything is denoted by “dhamma”, which includes sankata (saṅkhāra) AND
nama gotta. Here nama gotta are the “records” of all events of all beings in the mental plane that are
truly permanent; see, “Difference Between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala))”.
§ This is why the Buddha’s last words were, “vaya Dhamma saṅkhāra, appamadena
sampadetha“, or “All perishable Dhamma are saṅkhāra (or saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)); thus
strive diligently and identify “san” (“san” + “pā” “detha“)”.
§ From beginningless time, we all built a new saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) each time the old
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) got destroyed. We do this uncountable times DURING each
lifetime and also at death: we have been brahmas, devas, and humans countless times, but we
have spent much more time in the four lowest realms. Thus in his last words the Buddha
advised us to stop this senseless rebirth process which is filled with so much suffering, and to
attain the permanent happiness of nirāmisa sukha in Nibbāna.
§ By the way, Nibbāna is the only “entity” that does not ARISE due to causes; it is
“asankata” (“a” + “saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)” or “not saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)” or
“not conditioned”) because it does not have causes. It is reached via ELIMINATING THE
CAUSES for everything that arise due to causes, i.e., nirodha of saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)
automatically leads to Nibbāna.
3.2.8 Nibbāna “Exists”, but Not in This World
September 2, 2016; Revised November 24, 2016 (#9); Revised April 17, 2017
1. Misconceptions about Nibbāna arise because the true meaning of it had been hidden for many
hundreds of years. In the previous posts in this series, I have described what Nibbāna is.
§ The question many people have is, “what happens to an Arahant upon death?”. One simply is
not reborn anywhere in the 31 realms of this world. It is called Parinibbāna (“pari” +
Nibbāna“; meaning “full Nibbāna“).
§ Until Parinibbāna, an Arahant lives like a normal person, and is subjected to kamma vipāka;
during that time it is called saupadisesa Nibbāna, i.e., Nibbāna is not complete.
2. It is not possible “describe” Nibbāna (or more precisely what happens after Parinibbāna) in terms
of the terminology rooted in “this world”. Not a single word that we use can be used to describe what
Nibbāna is like.
§ We simply do not have any “data” or “concepts” or “terminology” that pertain to Nibbāna
because those would be totally foreign to us living in “this world”.
§ One crude analogy would be trying to explain to a fish what life is like outside the water: how
one needs to breathe air instead of water. Another would be like trying to explain to a person
who has time-traveled from thousand years ago, how a radio or a television works. He would
not have sufficient “data” to be able to comprehend how a radio or a TV works.
3. But Nibbāna “exists” because one can attain it. But it does not exist in this world of 31 realms.
§ There are four sutta in the Udana section of the Anguttara Nikāya that explain Nibbāna (Udana
8.1 through 8.4); the first one at, “WebLink: suttacentral: PaṭhamanibbānapaṭisaṃyuttaSutta“.
§ Once you open a sutta, click on the left-most drop down to choose on of several languages.
This is good resource; consider making a donation if you find it useful. Note: I am not
associated with them in any way.
§ Of source, the translations are incorrect frequently for key Pāli words, as is the case at many
sites. But at least one can see the correct Pāli version.
4. Let us look at the first one, Paṭhama Nibbāna Paṭisaṃyutta sutta. It say, ““Atthi, bhikkhave,
tadāyatanaṃ, yattha neva pathavī, na āpo, na tejo, na vāyo, na ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ, na
viññāṇañcāyatanaṃ, na ākiñcaññāyatanaṃ, na nevasaññānāsaññāyatanaṃ, nāyaṃ loko, na
paraloko, na ubho candimasūriyā..”.
§ Let us consider the first part: “atthi, bhikkhave, tadāyatanan“. Here “atthi” means “exists”, and
“tadāyatana” is another word for Nibbāna. Tadāyatana comes from “tath” + “āyatana“, where
“tath” (pronounced “thath”) means “perfect” and “āyatana” means “faculties”. Phonetically,
the combined word is “tadāyatana” (pronounced “thadayathana”).
§ Thus the translation is, “Bhikkhus, Nibbāna exists (where everything is perfect)”.
5. The rest of the verse is, “there is not patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo (satara mahā bhūta) there; there is no
ākāsānañcāyatana, no viññāṇañcāyatana, no ākiñcaññāyatana, no nevasaññānāsaññāyatana;
furthermore, there is no “this world (that we experience), there is no para loka (where gandhabba
live: see, “Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)); and the Moon or the Sun
would not arise there (canidimasuriya is for “chandra” or the Moon and sūriya is the Sun).
§ So, aa that we experience (including jhāna), are not there after Parinibbāna, as discussed in #2
above). Our terminology simply does not apply there.
6. One time, the inquisitor Vaccagotta (there is a whole series of suttas in the Vaccagottavagga of the
Saṃyutta Nikāya about his probing questions put forth to the Buddha), asked the Buddha what
happens to an Arahant upon death: “Where would he/she go?”.
§ The Buddha showed him a burning fire, and asked him, “when this fire is extinguished, can you
say where it went?”. Vaccagotta understood. When the fire is extinguished, it simply is not
there anymore. That is all one can say. In the same way, when an Arahant dies, he/she is not
reborn and thus cannot be “found” anywhere in the 31 realms.
§ On the other hand, someone with abhiññā powers (with the cutūpapāda ñāṇa) can see where a
normal person is reborn upon death. That life stream exists somewhere in the 31 realms.
7. The Buddha could only explain to us the way to attain Nibbāna, by relinquishing our desire for
worldly things based on the unsatisfactory nature (or the anicca nature) of this world.
§ He said, “rāgakkhayo Nibbānan, dosakkhayo Nibbānan, Mohakkhayo Nibbānan“, i.e., one
attains Nibbāna via getting rid of rāga, dosa, moha in our minds. Thus cleansing our minds is
the only way to Nibbāna.
§ However, it is not possible to even start on “rāgakkhaya” until one gets to the Sotāpanna stage.
“Rāgakkhaya” is attained partially at the Anāgāmī stage (via removal of kāma rāga) and fully
at the Arahant stage (via removal of rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga). A Sotāpanna would have
reduced dosa to paṭigha level (which is removed at the Anāgāmī stage), and moha to avijjā
level (which is removed at the Arahant stage).
§ In the new section, “Living Dhamma“, we discuss these points and start from a basic level,
even without referring to deeper concepts like rebirth.
8. The point is that Nibbāna is to be comprehended in stages.
§ The very first stage is to experience the first stages of Nibbāna or “Niveema” or “cooling
down” that can be experienced even before getting to the Sotāpanna stage. In fact, it is not
possible to get to the Sotāpanna stage by skipping this step.
§ In order to attain the Sotāpanna stage one MUST comprehend the anicca nature of this world to
some extent. In order for the mind to grasp that concept, it must be free of the “coarse
defilements” or “pancanivārana” or “five hindrances” that cover one’s mind.
§ For that one MUST live a moral life, start contemplating Buddha Dhamma, and experience the
“cooling down” that results.
9. Many people try to attain or comprehend Nibbāna by reading about deep concepts about what it is.
There are so many books out there on explaining what Nibbāna is, by people who may not have
experienced even the basic “cooling down” or “nirāmisa sukha“.
§ They try to explain concepts like sunyata or “emptiness” and bodhicitta; see, “What is Sunyata
or Sunnata (Emptiness)?“. That is a complete waste of time, because as we saw above, it is not
possible to describe Nibbāna with words that we know.
§ Rather, one starts experiencing Nibbāna in stages. One can start experiencing the RELIEF or
COOLING DOWN that results when one starts living a moral life and start discarding dasa
akusala in STAGES.
§ Furthermore, it is important to understand that one does not start on the Path by first
comprehending the anicca nature; the anicca nature will gradually become clear.
§ The Buddha clearly stated the importance of following a gradual Path in the “Mahā
Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“. Also, see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ Even a person who does not believe in rebirth can start from this level: “Living Dhamma“.
10. In the post, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma – Introduction“, we saw that everything that
EXISTS, can be put into four ultimate constituents (paramatta dhamma):
§ Thoughts (citta)
§ Thought qualities or mental factors (cetasika)
§ Matter (rūpa)
§ Nibbāna
The first three exist in “this world” of 31 realms; Nibbāna does not exist within the 31 realms, but it
“exists”, i.e., it can be attained.
11. Finally, let us discuss some relevant characteristics of an Arahant, i.e., one who has attained
Nibbāna. He/she cannot experience Nibbānic bliss (experience of Nibbāna) unless getting into
Nirodha Samāpatti for a maximum of 7 days at a time.
§ When an Arahant is in Nirodha Samāpatti, there are no citta or thoughts flowing through
his/her mind. There is no breathing and is not very different from a dead body. The point is, that
Arahant will not be explain to us “the experience of Nibbāna“. In our terminology, all he/she
can say is that he/she did not experience any “worldly thoughts”.
§ At other times, an Arahant will be experiencing “this world” just like another human: he/she
will recognize people/things, sounds, smells, etc. The only exception is that thoughts burdened
with rāga, dosa, moha cannot arise: Asobhana (non-beautiful) cetasika will not be associated
with those thoughts; see, “What Are Kilesa (Mental Impurities)? – Connection to Cetasika“.
§ But he/she will be engaged in puñña kriya (meritorious deeds like delivering discourses), just
like the Buddha did; they are just “actions”, and are not puññābhisaṅkhāra or puñña
abhisaṅkhāra.
12. Here is another interesting point: Some Arahants may have kammic energy for the “human
bhava” left when he/she dies; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“. But still
there will not be another rebirth for any Arahant in this world.
§ The reason is that the “status of the Arahanthood” could not be borne (or sustained) by any
other body than a dense human body. For example, if he/she were to be reborn human, then a
human gandhabba need to come out of the dead human body; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya
Kāya)“. But the fine body (trija kaya) of the gandhabba cannot “bear” the energy associated
with an Arahant. In the same way, the fine bodies of a deva or a brahma also cannot.
§ We can consider the following analogy to make clear what happens. When a heater coil is
immersed in water, it can “bear” the current that passes through it, even when the water is
boiling. But if we take a coil out of the water, it will burn. The heater coil cannot “bear” the
current passing through it, unless it is immersed in water.
§ In the same way, the “Arahanthood” can be “borne” or be “sustained” only with a solid human
body; once the gandhabba comes out of that body –upon the death of that physical body — the
“Arahanthood” cannot be “borne” by that very fine body. In fact, the “Arahanthood” cannot be
“borne” by a even a lay person for more than 7 days; once attaining the “Arahanthood“, one
must become a Bhikkhu within 7 days, or one will die, because a lay person cannot “bear” the
“Arahanthood“.
§ This is why it is called “parinibbāna” at the death of an Arahant: “the Nibbāna is complete”.
The Sinhala word is “pirinivana“, where “nivana” is Nibbāna and “pirinu” means “full” or
“complete”.
Revised October 25, 2016; April 11, 2017; September 13, 2017; November 25, 2017; January 26,
2018; May 25, 2019; August 6, 2019
Introduction
1. No other factor has contributed to help keep Nibbāna hidden in the past many hundreds of years
than the incorrect interpretations of anicca as just “impermanence” and anatta as just “no-self.” If
one can find even a single instance in the Pāli Tipiṭaka (not translations) that describe anicca and
anatta that way, please let me know at [email protected]. Also, before quoting English
translations of the Tipiṭaka, please read the post, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by
Early European Scholars.”
§ I consider this series of posts on “anicca, dukkha, anatta” to be the most important at the
website. Reading the posts in the given order could be very beneficial.
§ It is said that a Buddha comes to this world to reveal three words and eight letters (in
Pāli).“Attakkarā thīnapadā Sambuddhena pakāsithā, na hī sīla vatan hotu uppajjati
Tathāgatā.” That means, “a Buddha (Tathāgata) is born NOT just to show how to live a
moral life, but to reveal 3 words with 8 letters to the world“. So far, I have not seen this
verse in the Tipiṭaka; it is likely to have been in an early commentary.
§ These three words with eight letters are anicca, dukkha, anatta. (when written in Sinhala/Pāli:
අනිච්ච දුක් ඛ අනත්ත but with last two letters in each term in the “old script” combined to
become one, so the number of letters becomes eight instead of 11. I was able to find only අනත්ථ
for අනත්ත, but you can see how four letters become three there).
Anicca is pronounced “anichcha,” rhymes with “picture.”
WebLink: Listen to pronounciation of : anicca
Dukkha is pronounced similarly, duk+kha.
WebLink: Listen to pronounciation of : dukkha
Anatta is pronounced “anaththa.”
WebLink: Listen to pronounciation of : anatta
See, “Pāli Glossary and Pronunciation” for more meanings of Pāli terms and sound files on
pronunciations.
2. Asubha (“non-auspicious” or “unfruitful” nature) is another characteristic of nature. It appears
together with anicca, dukkha, anatta in several suttas, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral:
Vipallāsa Sutta (AN 4.49)“.
§ Furthermore, the word, Tilakkhaṇa, does not appear in the Tipiṭaka to my knowledge.
§ However, anicca, dukkha, anatta appear as a group in many suttas, as we discuss below. Thus
it is justifiable to clump them together as Tilakkhaṇa.
Why Are Tilakkhaṇa so Important?
3. The Buddha clarified these “three characteristics of this world” in his very first sutta; see, “Does
the First Noble Truth Describe only Suffering?“.
§ These are the three primary characteristics of “this world.” A Buddha comes to the world to
reveal the true nature of the world.
§ Any moral person instinctively knows (and most religions teach) how to live a righteous life;
see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart.”
§ The Buddha stated that if one comprehends the true nature of “this world,” as codified in these
three words, then one would attain the Stream Entry (Sotāpanna) stage of Nibbāna; see, “Why
is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta so Important?”.
4. Therefore, a good understanding of the words anicca, dukkha, anatta is critical. If one sticks to
incorrect interpretation of these three words, no matter how much effort one exerts, there is no
possibility of attaining the Sotāpanna stage. Even in most Theravāda English texts, these three words
have incorrect translations as impermanence, suffering, and “no-soul” or “no-self.”
§ The correct meanings are: Nothing in this world can be maintained to one’s satisfaction. When
one strives to achieve that, it leads to suffering. However, many people try to gain “happiness”
by resorting to immoral deeds, and then end up in the apāyas. That is how one becomes
genuinely helpless.
§ Striving to achieve the impossible (i.e., seeking happiness in worldly things), only leads to
suffering.
5. The Pāli word for impermanence is NOT anicca; it is addhuva or aniyata. For example, “Jīvitaṃ
aniyataṃ, Maraṇaṃ niyataṃ” means, “life is not permanent, death is.” [addhuva :[adj.] unstable;
impermanent. aniyata :[adj.] uncertain; not settled.]
“addhuvaṃ jīvitaṃ, dhuvaṃ maraṇaṃ” means the same thing.
§ Therefore, the critical mistake was in translating the original Pāli word anicca to Sanskrit as
“anitya,” which does mean impermanence.
§ This term, “dhuva” comes in the Brahmanimantanika Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 49), where the
Baka Brahma says his existence is permanent; see #12 of “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It
Really Means.”
6. Now let us examine the damage done by translating the original Pāli word anatta to Sanskrit as
“anātma.”
§ At the time of the Buddha also, there were two opposing views on the idea of a “self.” One
camp insisted that there is an unchanging “soul” (ātma) associated with a being. This camp thus
corresponds to the major religions of the world today with the concept that when one dies,
one’s soul goes to heaven or hell.
§ The opposing camp argued that there is “no-soul” (anātma) and that when one dies, there is
nothing that survives the death. This view is the materialistic view today that our minds arise
from matter and thus there is nothing that survives death.
§ The Buddha said it was neither. There is no “self” permanently associated with a living being:
both the mind and the body are in constant flux (see the Section on “The Grand Unified Theory
of Dhamma”), and thus there is no “soul” or an “unchanging self.” On the other hand, there is
continuity at death based on cause-and-effect (paṭicca samuppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
Introduction“). Therefore, it is ALSO incorrect to say that there is “no-soul” and that death is
the end of that living being. The new living being is a continuation of the old living being, just
as an older man is a continuation of the process from the baby stage. There is change at every
MOMENT, based on cause-and-effect; the “new” is dependent on the “old.” Also see, “What
Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ That is also why it is not correct to say that an Arahant is annihilated at death (i.e., at
Parinibbāna). See, “Yamaka Sutta (SN 22.85) – Arahanthood Is Not Annihilation but End of
Suffering“.
They Are Related to Each Other
7. The Buddha stated that the three characteristics of “this world” are RELATED to each other:
“yadaniccam tam dukkham, yam dukkham tadanattā” (“yad aniccam tam dukkham, yam dukkham
tad anattā“), i.e.,
“if something is anicca, dukkha arises, and one becomes helpless (anatta).”
§ (In the Saṃyutta Nikāya (Anicca Vagga), many suttas including WebLink: suttacentral:
Ajjhattanicca Sutta (SN 35.1), WebLink: suttacentral: Bahiranicca Sutta (SN 35.4), and
WebLink: suttacentral: Yadanicca sutta (SN 22.15) have the above verse.)
8. Now let us see what happens if we take anicca to be impermanent and anatta to be “no-soul.”
Then the above verse reads, “if something is not permanent, suffering arises, and because of that one
becomes “no-self.”
§ Many people take a human body as “it,” and say that since the body is impermanent, suffering
arises. But the suttas mentioned above describe this for all six internal senses (Ajjhattanicca —
Ajjhatta Anicca — Sutta) and for everything external that is sensed by the six sense faculties
(Bāhiranicca — Bāhira Anicca– Sutta). Therefore, that verse holds for anything and everything
“in this world.”
§ Thus if a headache does not become permanent, it is meaningless to say it has no self.
§ But there are many things in the world, if become permanent, would lead to happiness: health,
wealth, association with someone liked, moving away from someone disliked, etc.
§ As we will show in the next post (“Anicca – True Meaning“), the correct translation holds for
any case.
9. Now the opposite of the above statement must be correct too (in mathematical logic, this is not
correct generally, but in this particular case it can be shown to be right. It is due to the assumption
that “dukkha” depends only on “nicca” or “anicca” and no other factor); see, “Logical Proof that
Impermanence is Incorrect Translation of Anicca.”
If we take the incorrect interpretations, that says:
“if something is permanent, suffering does not arise, and because of that, it implies a “self.”
§ If one has a permanent headache or a sickness, how can that stop suffering? And in what sense
a “self” arise?
§ There are many things in this world if become permanent, would lead to suffering: a disease,
poverty, association with someone disliked, moving away from a loved one, etc.
Thus we can see that anicca and anatta do not mean impermanence and “no-self.”
§ However, if we take the correct translation, we can show that the reverse statement also holds
as we discuss in the next post: “Anicca – Inability to Keep What We Like.”
Everyone Knows Anything in This World is Impermanent
10. Permanence and impermanence are inseparable PROPERTIES of living beings, objects, and
events. On the other hand, nicca/anicca are PERCEPTIONS IN ONE’S MIND about them.
§ We cannot maintain anything to our satisfaction (including “our” own body) in the long run,
and that is anicca. And because of that, we become distraught, and that is dukkha. And since we
are unable to prevent this sequence of events, we are truly helpless in the long run, and nothing
is with any real substance in the end; that is anatta.
§ Here is a video that illustrates the concept of anicca clearly:
§ We need to realize that we all will go through this inevitable change as we get old. No matter
how hard we try, it is not possible to maintain ANYTHING to our satisfaction. It is the nature
of “this world”: anicca.
§ Now, of course, any of these celebrities (or their fans) will be saddened to see that comparison.
They have not been able to maintain their bodies to their satisfaction. However, a person who is
in bad terms with any of these celebrities could be happy to see those pictures, since he/she
would like to see something terrible to happen to that celebrity.
11. Thus “impermanence” is inevitable; it is a property of anything in this world. But “anicca” is a
perception in someone’s mind. That perception CAN be changed; that is how one gets rid of
suffering.
§ In the above case, celebrities’ bodies ARE impermanent; but that did not necessarily cause
suffering to ALL. It caused pain to only those who did not like them getting old. If they had any
enemies, those would be happy to see them losing their “good looks.”
§ Impermanence is a fact; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.” But impermanence is
NOT the MEANING of anicca.
§ These pictures provide the visual impact that we do not usually get. We don’t see changes in
ourselves because the change is gradual.
12. A Buddha is not needed to show that impermanence is an inherent characteristic of our universe.
Scientists are well aware of that, but they have not attained Nibbāna. Anicca is a profound concept
with several meanings, and they are all related. Here are three ways to look at it:
§ “Anicca – Inability to Keep What We Like” (listed above also).
§ “Anicca – Repeated Arising/Destruction.”
§ “Anicca – Worthlessness of Worldly Things.”
13. Finally, the Buddha has said, “Sabbe Dhamma anatta.” So, what does “all dhamma are “no-
self” mean (if anatta meant “no-self”)? Dhamma includes everything, which means inert things too.
Does it make sense to say, “a tree has “no-self” or “a mountain has “no-self”?? On the other hand,
nothing in this world is of any real value in the end. They all have transient existence: That is anatta
nature.
§ Another keyword that had lost its true meaning is “san“; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of
Sansara (or Samsara)“.
Possible Historical Reasons for Mistranslations
14. We can see the origins of some of these incorrect translations by looking at how Buddha Dhamma
was transmitted over time. For details, see, “Historical Background.”
§ For about 500 years after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha, the Pāli Tipiṭaka was transmitted
orally, from generation to generation of bhikkhus, who faithfully passed down the Pāli Canon.
Of course, it had been DESIGNED for easy oral transmission.
§ See, “Preservation of the Dhamma” for a discussion on this aspect. The original teachings of
the Buddha are still intact.
15. Then it was written down for the first time in 29 BCE in Sri Lanka with Sinhala script. Pāli is a
phonetic language that does not have an alphabet.
§ The Tipiṭaka was never translated to any other language until the Europeans discovered
“Buddhism” in the late 1600’s; see, “Background on the Current Revival of Buddha Dhamma.”
§ Tipiṭaka was not translated to even the Sinhala language until 2005.
16. When Rhys Davis and others started doing those English translations, they were heavily
influenced by Sanskrit Mahāyāna sutras, as well by Vedic literature. Think about it: when the
Europeans first started discovering all these different Pāli and Sanskrit documents, they must have
been overwhelmed by the complexities.
§ It took them some time to separate Buddhism from Hinduism, and in the process, some
concepts got mixed up; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early European
Scholars.”
§ For example, They ASSUMED that “anatta” was the same as “anātma,” which is a Sanskrit
word, with a different meaning of “no-self.” Similarly, they took “anicca” to mean the same as
Sanskrit “anitya,” which does mean “impermanent.”
17. The worst was that even contemporary Sinhala scholars like Malasekara (who was a doctoral
student of Rhys Davis), “learned” Buddhism from the Europeans, and thus started using wrong
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 133
interpretations. Other Sinhala scholars like Kalupahana and Jayathilake also learned “Buddhism” at
universities in the United Kingdom.
§ Following the original translations by Rhys Davis, Eugene Burnouf, Olcott, and others, those
Sinhala scholars also write books in both English and Sinhala. Of course, scholars in other
Buddhist countries did the same in their languages, and the incorrect interpretations spread
throughout the whole world.
§ To correct this grave problem, we need to go back to the Tipiṭaka in Pāli and start the process
there.
§ Pāli suttas should not be translated word-to-word; most of the suttas are condensed and written
in style conducive for oral transmission; see, “Sutta – Introduction.”
§ Commentaries were written to explain critical concepts in the Tipiṭaka, and only three of those
original commentaries have survived. We need to rely heavily on those three:
Paṭisambhidāmagga, Peṭakopadesa, and Nettippakarana.
§ Instead, most people rely on incorrect commentaries written in more recent years, especially
Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga. For details, see, “Buddhaghosa and Visuddhimagga –
Historical Background.” However, Buddhaghosa did not change the meanings of the words
anicca, dukkha, anatta. That is likely to have happened in more recent times as I explained
above). But he incorporated many other Hindu concepts like breath meditation and kasina
meditation; see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis.”
18. It is also important to note that mass printing was not available until recent years, and became
common only in the 1800’s; see, “WebLink: newworldencyclopedia.org: Printing press.”
§ Thus mass production of books became possible only with the new printing presses that came
out in the 1800s. By that time, key concepts had been mistranslated.
§ In the early days, Tipiṭaka was written on specially prepared leaves and needed to be re-written
by hand every 100-200 years before they degraded. So, we must be grateful to the bhikkhus in
Sri Lanka who did this dutifully over almost 2000 years.
§ Sinhala language (both spoken and written) changed over the past 2000 years. The need to re-
write it every 100 or so years made sure that any changes in Sinhala script were taken into
account.
§ Of course, no one should be able to insist, “this is the only truth, and nothing else is the truth.”
But the truth can be verified to one’s satisfaction by critically examining the evidence. I am
open to discuss any valid contrary evidence. We need to sort out the truth for the benefit of all.
21. Finally, it may not be possible to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta straight away. One must
first follow the mundane path to learn basic concepts like kamma and rebirth.
§ More details at “Transition to Noble Eightfold Path.”
§ A systematic approach at “Living Dhamma.”
22. Anicca and anatta are complex Pāli words that cannot be translated into English directly. There is
no English word that can convey the meaning of anicca (or anatta). The following subsections
discuss those two complex Pāli words:
Anicca – True Meaning
Anattā – A Systematic Analysis
3.3.2 Anicca – True Meaning
This post was originally entitled, “Anicca – Inability to Maintain Anything”. I have re-written with a
new title to emphasize the meaning in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (SN 56.11); for more
details: “Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta“.
1. The First Noble Truth clearly states that anicca nature is the root cause of suffering. Let us look at
how the Buddha summarized the First Noble Truth about suffering in that very first sutta he
delivered:
I dam kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkham ariyasaccam:
jātipi dukkhā, jarāpi dukkhā, byādhipi dukkho, maraṇampi dukkhāṃ, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho,
piyehi vippayogo dukkho, yampicchaṃ na labhati tampi dukkhāṃ—saṃkhittena
pañcupādānakkhandhā dukkhā.
Translated: Bhikkhus, What is the Noble Truth of Suffering?
“Birth is suffering, getting old is suffering, getting sick is suffering, dying is suffering. Having to
associate with things that one does not like is suffering and having to separate from those things one
likes is suffering. If one does not get what one likes, that is suffering – in brief, the origin of
suffering is the craving for the five aggregates of rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa
(pañcupādānakkhandha). All we crave for in this world are represented by pañcupādānakkhandha
(upādāna or craving for the pañcakkhandha).
2. The first part in bold indicates what we consider to be forms of suffering: Birth, getting old, getting
sick, and dying.
§ We may not remember, but birth is a traumatic event, just like the dying moment. Coming out
of the birth canal is a traumatic event for both the mother and the baby. More importantly, all
births LEAD to suffering, because getting old, getting sick, and eventual death is built-in with
ANY birth.
§ We also DO NOT LIKE to get old, to get sick, and we definitely do not like to die. If we have
to experience any of them, that is suffering.
§ What we WOULD LIKE is to stay young, not get old, not get sick, and not to die ever. If we
can have those conditions fulfilled we will be forever happy.
§ Therefore, it is clear that the suffering that the Buddha focused on in his first discourse was
associated with the rebirth process.
3. That is what the second part of the verse in #1 (not in bold) says: Having to associate with things
that one does not like is suffering and having to separate from those things one likes is suffering.
§ At the very basic level, we all have experienced the sorrow when separating from those who
like or when we are forced to be with those who we do not like.
§ If we can be born instantaneously at a young age (say, 15 to 25 years), and stay at that age
without getting old or sick and never die, that is what we WOULD LIKE. But no matter how
much we would like to associate with such a life, we will NEVER get it.
§ Instead we have to suffer at birth (coming to this world through the birth canal is painful), when
getting old, when getting sick, and finally when dying. There is no way to dissociate from those
four things that we do not like.
§ But that is not the end of it. We will keep doing this over and over in the rebirth cycle.
Furthermore, things can get much worse in the lowest four realms, including the animal realm.
4. Both those parts are combined in to one succinct statement in the third part of the verse in #1 (in
bold): “Yampiccam nalabhati tampi dukkham“.
“Yampicchaṃ na labhati tampi dukkhaṃ” is actually a shortened version of the verse (that rhymes).
The full sentence is “Yam pi icchaṃ na labhati tam pi dukkhaṃ“.
§ “Yam pi icchaṃ” means “whatever is liked or craved for”. “Na labhati” means “not getting”.
“tam pi dukkhaṃ” means “that leads to suffering”.
§ Therefore, that verse simply says: “If one does not get what one craves or likes, that leads
to suffering”.
§ This is a more general statement, and applies in any situation. We can see that in our daily
lives. We like to hang out with people we like and it is a stress to be with people that we do not
like.
§ Furthermore, the more one craves something, the more suffering one will endure at the
But this requires a lot of discussion.
end.
5. Negation of the word “nicca” is “anicca” (“na” + “icca“), just like the word Anāgāmi comes from
“na” + “āgāmi“. Therefore, even though we would like the Nature to be “nicca“, in reality it is
“anicca“, i.e., it is not possible, in the long run, to have, to be with, what we like, and that is the root
cause of suffering. One may live most of one’s life happily, but one would have to leave all that
behind when one dies.
§ A deeper point is that we all like to born in good realms, but most future births will NOT be to
our liking, but are based on “Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ By the way, Pāli words “icca” and “anicca” are pronounced “ichcha” and “anichcha”.
§ Not getting what one desires or craves is the opposite of “icca” or “na icca” or “anicca“. This
is the same way that “na āgami” becomes “Anāgāmi” (“na āgami” means “not coming back”;
but in the context of Anāgāmi, it means “not coming back to kāma loka or the lowest 11
realms. Both these are examples of Pāli sandhi rules (connecting two words together).
6. Therefore, “yampiccaṃ nalabhati tampi dukkhaṃ” is the most important verse in the first sutta
delivered by the Buddha, Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta. It provides the key to understanding the
Buddha’s message, and led to attaining of the Sotapanna stage by the five ascetics.
§ It should be noted that icca and iccha (ඉච්ච and ඉච්ඡ in Sinhala) are used interchangeably in
the Tipitaka under different suttas. The word “iccha” with the emphasis on the last syllable is
used to indicate “strong icca” or “strong attachment”.
§ The word “icca” (liking) is closely related to “taṇhā” (getting attached). Taṇhā happens
automatically because of icca.
§ The intrinsic nature of this world is “anicca“, i.e., we will never get what we crave for, and thus
at the end (at least at death) we will leave all this behind and suffer, that is dukkha.
7. It is important to realize that nicca is the PERCEPTION that one can maintain things that one likes
to one’s satisfaction.
§ If this is indeed the case, then one is happy, i.e., sukha arises, or at least suffering does not
arise. In that case one is in control, and there is something fruitful to be had, i.e., atta. Thus
even if one needs to work hard to get something that can be maintained to one’s satisfaction, at
the end one can find permanent happiness, and one is in control of one’s own destiny.
§ Humans normally have that nicca saññā, and work hard to gain material things. But at death,
one has to leave behind all those possessions, and thus one’s life ALWAYS ends in despair and
suffering (in addition to suffering due to old age).
§ Until one realizes the true “anicca nature”, one will be trapped in the rebirth process, and will
be subjected to much suffering because of that inherent “anicca nature”. The Buddha advised to
cultivate the anicca saññā.
§ More information on anicca as the opposite of “nicca“: “Three Marks of Existence – English
Discourses“.
8. Thus the root cause of suffering is NOT impermanence, even though it does play the role.
§ The world is inherently impermanent (see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“).
However, impermanence by itself does not lead to suffering. If that is the case, since no one can
change that fact, no one will be able to end the suffering (and to attain Nibbāna).
§ It is the wrong PERCEPTION (saññā) of nicca that leads to suffering. That perception CAN
BE changed by learning and contemplating on Dhamma, i.e., by cultivating the anicca saññā.
§ The CORRECT PERCEPTION of anicca (once accepted by the mind), will lead to cessation of
suffering (via the four stages of Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmi, Anāgāmi, Arahant).
Also see, “Does Impermanence Lead to Suffering?“, ………..
9. The above point can be illustrated using this set of pictures: “WebLink: ranker.com: Celebrities
Who Have Aged the Worst“
§ We need to realize that we all will go through this inevitable changes as we get old; no matter
how hard we try, it is not possible to maintain ANYTHING to our satisfaction. It is the nature
of “this world”.
§ Now, of course any of these celebrities (or their fans) will be saddened to see the comparison;
they have not been able to maintain their bodies to their satisfaction.
§ However, a person who is in bad terms with any of these celebrities could be happy to see the
picture, because that person’s wish is to see something bad to happen to the celebrity (in this
case to lose their “looks”).
§ Thus “impermanence” is something that is inevitable; it is a property of anything in this world.
But “anicca” is in someone’s mind. In the above case, celebrities bodies ARE impermanent;
but that did not necessarily cause suffering to ALL.
§ On the other hand, anicca nature leads to suffering for ALL. More importantly, one can stop
future suffering by comprehending the anicca nature.
10. When one realizes that one cannot maintain something that desired after a long struggle, one
becomes distraught, depressed, unsatisfied (“yam pi icchaṃ na labati tam pi dukkhaṃ”, where “na
labati” means “not get”). Thus the wrong perception of nicca (or a sense of possible fulfilment of
one’s desires) ALWAYS leads to dukha or suffering at the end.
§ The mindset is that even if something is not permanent and breaks down, one can always
replace it with a new one and get the sense fulfilment one desires. It is not the impermanence
that gives sense of invincibility but the mindset that one can always find a replacement for
it and maintain one’s happiness.
§ But if one carefully examines the wider world view of the Buddha, one can easily see that this
mindset of the possibility of “long lasting happiness in this world” is an illusion.
§ No matter what we achieve in this life, we HAVE TO leave it all behind when we die.
§ And in the new life, we start all over; this is what we have been doing from beginning-less
time.
§ And of course we make it worse by doing immoral things “trying to maintain things to our
satisfaction” and thus generating bad kamma vipāka, leading to immense suffering in the four
lowest realms (apāyas).
11. In the Saṃyutta Nikāya (Anicca Vagga), many suttas including WebLink: suttacentral:
Ajjhattanicca Sutta (SN 35.1), WebLink: suttacentral: Bahiranicca Sutta (SN 35.4), and WebLink:
suttacentral: Yadanicca sutta (SN 22.15), the Buddha stated that the three characteristics of “this
world” (anicca, dukkha, anatta) are RELATED to each other:
“yadaniccaṃ taṃ dukkhaṃ, taṃ dukkhaṃ tadanatta” (expanded to “yad aniccaṃ taṃ dukkhaṃ, taṃ
dukkhaṃ tad anatta”), or,
– “if something cannot be maintained (or managed depending on the case) to one’s satisfaction,
suffering arises, therefore one is helpless in the end”.
12. Let us consider the same examples that we considered in bullet #6 of the introductory post
“Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ If we take a “headache” as the “something”, the statement now reads: “if a headache cannot
be maintained (managed is a better word here) to one’s satisfaction (i.e., if one cannot get
rid of the headache), suffering arises, therefore one is helpless”.
§ Similarly, you can substitute anything that we considered in the previous post and see that it
will hold.
§ On the other hand, if anicca means “impermanence”, the statement reads: “if a headache is
impermanent, suffering arises, therefore one is helpless”. That is obviously not correct.
Suffering would arise only if the headache becomes permanent!
13. No one in “this world” is exempt from these three characteristics. Even though one may be able
to find happiness at certain times, nothing we do can get us out of the realities of getting old, sick,
and finally dying. Then the cycle repeats in the next life, and next, ….
§ Furthermore, any such “happy times” are insignificantly small in the sansāric time scale; see,
“The Four Stages in Attaining Nibbāna“, and “How the Buddha Described the Chance of
Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
14. But the good news is that we can gain a kind of happiness that will not go away by
comprehending the anicca nature, especially if one attains at least the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna;
see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“, and “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to
Understand?“.
15. In the Tipiṭaka, the concept of anicca has been explained in many different ways. Two more are
discussed in, “Anicca – Repeated Arising/Destruction” and “Anicca – Worthlessness of Worldly
Things“.
3.3.2.2 Anicca – Repeated Arising/Destruction
1. Anicca has been analyzed in several different ways in the Tipiṭaka. In the Patisambidhā Magga
Prakarana in the Tipiṭaka, it is explained as,
“uppāda vayattena anicca”,
which means “(this world is) anicca because we just keep going through the birth (arising)/ death
(destruction) process”.
§ Of course, in between birth and death there is mostly suffering (in the realms at and below the
human realm, where most beings spend time). This is the dukkha characteristic.
2. This is what we have been doing for an unimaginably long time (beginning-less), there is no break
from it until one attains Nibbāna.
§ We see some people committing suicide hoping to end it all; but ending this life does not solve
the “problem”. In fact, it may lead to a birth in a lower realm, which will only increase the
suffering.
§ Thus continuing this ceaseless birth/death process is anatta, i.e., it is fruitless, burdened with
suffering, and thus one is truly helpless.
3. We can see the Three Characteristics (Tilakkhaṇa) of this world by carefully examining the fate of
anything that arises in this world, which goes by the name saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
§ Whether it is a living being or an inert thing any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) arises, lasts for a
certain time, and then perishes.
§ For an inert object, the process stops at the destruction step, and it does not feel anything as it
goes through the process.
§ But for a living being, there is (mostly) suffering during arising/living/death, even though there
may be spurts of “happiness” if one is fortunate enough to be born in human realms or the
realms above it.
§ And the process does not stop at death unlike for an inert object. It just keep repeating.
The arising/destruction of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is described in, “Root Cause of Anicca –
Five Stages of a Saṅkhata (Sankata in Sinhala)“, and in “Nirodha and Vaya – Two Different
Concepts“.
4. A living being’s suffering is also enhanced by the “saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) characteristics of
inert objects” too. We work hard to acquire “things” but either they get run down/destroyed (houses,
cars, furniture,…. ) or we die leaving them behind. Then if we are lucky to be born human in the next
birth we just start this “accumulation process” and get distraught at death again….
§ If we think through logically (and this is real meditation), we should be able to grasp this main
concept of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Through the ages, philosophers (as well as most people) have wondered, “What is the meaning
of life?”. And they normally think about just this present life; see, ““Why Does the World
Exist?” by Jim Holt“
5. Someone who has accomplished something significant may think otherwise at the moment of that
accomplishment. But it lasts only a short time; at death, it is all gone. If he/she wanted to accomplish
something significant in the next life (provided one is lucky to be reborn human), then one has to start
all over.
§ This point becomes poignantly clear, if one takes a little time and think about the life of any
famous personality (emperors, kings, politicians, movie stars,…from times past to the present).
Most of them are bound to be born in lower realms because of the heinous acts they did to get
some of those positions.
§ If one knows the “big picture” about the wider world and the beginning-less journey we have
made, it becomes clear that all through uncountable number of lives we have struggled in vain
“seeking an elusive happiness”. There is no meaning to life in the long run, AND it makes one
suffer, and this is the nature of this world: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
6. If there is a birth, there MUST be a death. There is no exception, other than Nibbāna.
This is the “akālika” or “timeless” quality of Nibbāna.
§ All saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) operate on the basis of kamma vipāka, which normally take
time to bring their fruits. This is why people are unable to “see” the working of kamma. There
may be drug dealers who live like kings, but they will be paying with interest in the future.
§ Nibbāna brings fruits instantaneously, there is no time gap involved (it is “akalika”), unlike a
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). Furthermore, once attained there is no time duration after which
it is destroyed; it is forever.
§ The magga phala (Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, Arahant) are attained in one citta
(lasting less than a billionth of a second). And since they were attained via ELIMINATION OF
CAUSES, there is no destruction associated with them. i.e., they are forever.
§ In comparison, a living being arises DUE TO CAUSES, and when the underlying cause or the
fuel is spent, the living being dies. But the process does not stop, because the being had
acquired NEW CAUSES (new kamma) during that life or in the previous lives.
7. In the Dhamma Vandana:
“Svākkhato Bhagavatā Dhammo Sandiṭṭhiko Akāliko Ehi-passiko Opanāyiko Paccattam
veditabbo vinnuhiti”,
the quality of Dhamma that is described by “akālika” is that it leads to effects that do not depend on
time.
§ And that is achieved via the quality listed before that: “sandiṭṭhiko” (“san” + “diṭṭhiko“).
Dhamma explains and clarifies “san” that are the causes (avijjā and taṇhā) for arising of
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (whether they are living or inert); see, “What is “San”? Meaning
of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ “Bhagavatā Dhammo” can be taken as “Buddha’s Dhamma“, but it has a deeper meaning too
(This Dhamma was only DISCOVERED by the Buddha Gotama, as had countless other
Buddhas before him. “Bhagavatā” (“bhaga” + “vata” where “bhaga” means divide and “vata”
means “the process” that looks like a “living being”“) means this Dhamma, by analyzing a
“person” in terms of “actions”, illustrates that there in no enduring entity in a “living being”.
§ And this process leads to “svakkhata” (“sva” for “self” and “+ “akkata” or “akrutha” or
“akriya” means putting out of action) meaning it leads to getting rid of the concept of a
“me” (asmai māna) — which happens at the Arahant stage. It is not about whether a “self”
exists or not; it is rather to realize that nothing in this world is worth to be considered “mine”.
8. Some people erroneously interpret “uppāda vayattena anicca” as “things are IMPERMANENT
because EVERYTHING is formed and destroyed within 17 thought moments”.
§ This serious misconception is discussed in the post, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17
Thought Moments?“.
§ Each saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) that arises has its own lifetime: a fly lives only for a few
days, a human lives for about 100 years.
Next, “Anicca – Worthlessness of Worldly Things“, ………
3.3.2.3 Anicca – Worthlessness of Worldly Things
1. Anicca (pronounced “anichcha”) is a deep concept that can be comprehended in many ways
(impermanence is only a small part of it). We discussed one interpretation as “it is not possible to
maintain anything in this world to one’s satisfaction”; see, “Anicca – Inability to Keep What We
Like“.
§ Another interpretation: whatever that we believe to provide lasting happiness arises and
destroyed, and also is subjected to unpredictable changes (viparināma) while it lasts; see,
“Anicca – Repeated Arising/Destruction“.
§ Here we discuss another: There is nothing in this world that is valuable and can provide lasting
happiness. Not only that, but more craving can only lead to more suffering!
2. The desire (iccā; pronounced “ichchā“) for any object depends on the value that one places for that
object. If one’s mind comes to the realization that the object really does not have any significant
value, then one would not have any desire for that object.
§ One has iccā for a given object which one perceives it to be of “nicca” (pronounced “nichcha“)
nature, i.e., that one thinks has value and can provide happiness.
§ If one realizes that a given object really does not have a true value, one loses craving for that
and sees the anicca nature of that object.
3. Suppose you give the following choices for a five-year old: a large chocolate bar or the title to a
brand new house (written to his/her name so that the child will be the owner of the house).
§ What will the child choose? Of course, the child will want the chocolate, and he/she will have
no idea how a piece of paper can be more valuable than a tasty chocolate! Thus the child has
the perception of nicca for the chocolate, i.e., that it can bring happiness whereas the happiness
from the house is hard to be grasped by the child.
§ However, when that same child grows up and becomes an adult, he/she will choose the title to
the house without hesitation. By that time, he/she would have come to the realization that a
house is much more valuable than a chocolate. The adult will realize the “anicca nature” of the
chocolate: it can only bring happiness only for a few minutes!
§ Did anyone have to specifically tell that adult that the title to the house is much more worth
than a chocolate? No. One would realize that when one learns more about the world.
§ Just the same way, when one learns Dhamma, one will AUTOMATICALLY realize that
nothing in this world has real value. But that realization comes gradually.
4. All immoral deeds (dasa akusala) are done because of the “value” one places on worldly things. A
child may hit another over that chocolate. An adult may be willing to lie, steal, or even kill to get
possession of a house.
§ When that adult grasps the key message of the Buddha (“anicca nature”), he/she will realize
that even just craving for a house is not worth compared to the “cooling down” one can gain by
getting rid of the cravings associated with the house; of course, one does not need to get rid of
the house.
§ He/she would realize that collecting “valuables” like houses, cars, etc. or making a lot of money
(much more than one needs) can bring only suffering at the end (and lose precious time one
could have spent on learning Dhamma and making progress towards Nibbāna).
5. Craving for sense objects can have bad consequences in a wide range. At a lower level, just
enjoying sense pleasures without harming others will make one bound to the kāma loka (via “pati
iccā sama uppada” or “what one likes is what one gets”); see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ However, if one does immoral deeds (dasa akusala) in order to get such “valuables”, then one
will be subjected to dukkha dukkha (direct suffering) in the apāyas in future lives; see,
“”Introduction -2 – The Three Characteristics of Nature“. This is the worst kind of future
suffering and one would not be able to comprehend that if one does not believe in rebirth or that
kammā vipāka, i.e., if one has micchā diṭṭhi.
§ Once one gets rid of micchā diṭṭhi, it will be easier to see one aspect of the anicca nature:
“aniccan khayattena“, which means “anicca nature leads to one to the downside”, i.e., to do
immoral acts and to end up experiencing unimaginable suffering (dukkha dukkha) in the
apāyas.
§ Thus anicca nature not only means that one cannot maintain things to one’s satisfaction in the
long run, but ALSO it can lead to much suffering in the future.
6. One can basically get to the Sotāpanna stage by comprehending the above harsh consequences of
anicca nature.
§ Buddha also said, “dukkham bhayattena” or “one should be fearful of the dukkha nature”, when
describing the characteristic of dukkha. At the Sotāpanna stage, one can see that anicca nature
directly leads to suffering (dukha) in the apāyas, but may not realize that much suffering (even
though less than in the apāyas) can also arise due to just being attached to sense pleasures, i.e.,
kāma rāga.
§ The full impact of “dukkham bhayattena” is realized only at the Anāgāmī stage (having seen a
glimpse of it at the Sakadāgāmi stage). This is when one realizes the dukha associated with
just the craving for sensual pleasures.
§ Craving for sense pleasures lead to saṅkhāra dukha and viparināma dukha, as explained in
detail in the post, “Introduction – What is Suffering?“. Even though I wrote that post a couple
of years ago, I did not truly grasp the truth of it until recently.
7. At the Sotāpanna stage one comprehends the “anicca nature”, and one implication of in the second
characteristics of dukkha: the dukkha dukkha. Even though one can see the truth of the other two
types of dukkha (saṅkhāra dukha and viparināma dukha), one does not “truly grasp their effects”.
Those two aspects of dukkha are present in the higher realms of kāma loka (human and deva realms).
§ One truly starts comprehending saṅkhāra dukha and viparināma dukha at the Sakadāgāmi
stage, and it will be completed only at the Anāgāmī stage. This leads to further strengthening of
“dukkham bhayattena“. One can see the danger in the types of dukha arising from attachment to
sense pleasures (even without engaging in immoral acts).
§ Comprehending that is much harder than seeing the dangers associated with immoral deeds
(leading to dukkha dukkha) that is grasped at the Sotāpanna stage.
8. By the time one gets to Anāgāmī stage, one would have removed the lower 5 types of bonds
(orambhagiya samyojana) that bind one to the realms in the kāma loka; see, “Dasa Samyojana –
Bonds in Rebirth Process“.
§ There are five higher samyojana associated with higher rūpa and arūpa realms. First one
removes rūpa rāga (attachment to rūpa jhāna) and then arūpa rāga (attachment to arūpa
jhāna).
§ Rūpa and arūpa jhānic pleasures are basically what is mostly experienced in the rūpa and
arūpa realms (highest 20 realms). In those realms dukkha dukkha and saṅkhāra dukkha are
absent and only the viparināma dukkha is present. One lives with jhānic pleasure until the end,
when one becomes helpless and could end up even in the apāyas.
9. In comprehending the Three Characteristics of nature, the key step is in realizing that collecting
“valuables” (houses, money, etc) as an adult is as foolish as collecting candy wrappers as a child.
§ In order to make that step of “higher wisdom” per Buddha Dhamma, one needs to first
understand the “world view of the Buddha”, that the world is of anicca nature, i.e., CRAVING
for those “valuables” only lead to suffering in the long run. By “long run” what is meant is not
only this life, but over future lives.
§ This is why belief in rebirth is a major requirement to even start on the mundane Path.
10. What the Buddha said was that it is an illusion to believe that ANY object in this world will have
the “nicca” nature, i.e., that there are things in this world has real, lasting value; the reality is the
opposite and is expressed by the word, “anicca“. The word “anicca” means there is nothing in this
world of value that can bring lasting happiness.
§ However, it is very difficult for one to comprehend this “anicca nature”, unless one believes in
the laws of kammā (i.e., that one’s actions will have consequences). A natural extension of the
laws of kammā is the validity of the rebirth process.
§ Many actions committed in this life do not bring fruits (their results) in this life; but they will in
future lives. Therefore, laws of kammā necessarily REQUIRE the rebirth process.
§ In Pāli terminology, one has more “iccā” or more attachment for an object that one perceives to
be of high value. One will have iccā for an object which one perceives to provide happiness,
i.e., one has the perception of “nicca” nature for that object. One thinks that it can provide
happiness.
§ But the reality is that either that object loses its value OR one dies, making any perceived value
zero at the end. One of those two outcomes cannot be avoided.
11. If one does not believe in the rebirth process (i.e., that this is only life that one has), then one
could be compelled to do whatever necessary to get possession of those valuable objects, since there
may not be any serious consequences.
§ For example, one could steal million dollars and hope to live the rest of life with all the
comforts one can hope for (if one is lucky to not get caught by the police).
§ Or, a drug addict could say, “I am just going to enjoy inhaling drugs until I die from it”,
thinking that there will not be any consequences after the physical body dies.
§ However, one’s outlook on such things will change dramatically if one can see the reality of the
rebirth process. Most people just believe what “science says” and do not even bother to look at
the ever increasing evidence for the rebirth process.
§ Science agrees that causes lead to corresponding effects: each action has a reaction. Nothing
happens without a reason, a cause. However, since science does not know much about how the
mind works, it is unable to provide answers to issues that involve the mind. kammā and
kammā vipāka are causes and corresponding effects.
12. Lobha (abhijjā) is the greed generated in a mind which puts a “very high value” for an object.
One is willing to do immoral acts to get possession.
§ One with kāma rāga has desire to enjoy sensual objects, but is not willing to hurt others to get
them. Most “moral people” belong to this category. Even a Sotāpanna starts at this stage. A
Sakadāgāmi has lost the desire to “own” such sensual objects, but still likes to enjoy them.
§ Thus the desire for sensual pleasures is gradually decreased as one makes progress through the
Sakadāgāmi stage, and loses all such desires for sensual pleasures at the Anāgāmī stage.
13. In other words, one starts losing value that one places for sensual objects (cars, houses, partners,
etc) as one progresses to higher stages of Nibbāna.
§ But the critical point to understand is that one LOSES such desires AUTOMATICALLY. One
does not need to, and one CANNOT, lose such desires by sheer will power. One needs to “see”
the dangers of such desires by developing the “dhamma eye”, or paññā (wisdom) by learning
and contemplating on the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Even if one forcefully keeps such desires SUPPRESSED (as yogis even before the Buddha used
to do), such desires will just stay dormant (remain as anusaya), and WILL resurface later in this
life or in future lives. Those anusaya can only be removed by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
Also see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – According to Some Key Suttas“.
Next, “Anatta and Dukkha – True Meanings“, ………
3.3.2.4 The Incessant Distress (“Pīlana”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca
1. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Girimananda Sutta (AN 10.60)“, the Buddha stated key features of
the anicca nature of “all saṅkhāra“: “Katamā cānanda, sabbasaṅkhāresu anicchāsaññā? Idhānanda,
bhikkhu sabbasaṅkhāresu aṭṭīyati harāyati jigucchati. Ayaṃ vuccatānanda, sabbasaṅkhāresu
anicchāsaññā“.
Translated: “And what, Ānanda, is the anicca saññā associated with all saṅkhāra? One is subjected
to stress, without any real benefit, and one need to treat all saṅkhāra like urine and feces. This is the
anicca saññā associated with all saṅkhāra“.
§ We will briefly discuss the “aṭṭīyati” nature. “Atti” means “bones” (ඇට in Sinhala). A dog
thinks that a bone is very valuable. It spends hours and hours chewing it, but only gets tired at
the end; it only makes the dog tired.
§ In the same way, we only get tired and stressed out (pīlana) by doing all types of saṅkhāra:
mano, vacī, and kāya; see, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
2. Most people think that the first Noble Truth on suffering is the physical suffering itself, i.e., they
associate it with the vedanā cetasika. However, the Buddha said, “This Dhamma is unlike anything
that the world has ever seen”. The real truth on suffering is the suffering that is hidden in what
everyone perceives to be happiness. It needs to be seen with the paññā (wisdom) cetasika.
§ In fact it is difficult to understand the first Noble Truth on suffering for someone who is feeling
too much suffering. When someone is hurting with an ailment or when someone’s mind is too
weak at old age, it is not possible to contemplate on the deep message of the Buddha, as we will
see below.
3. Dukkha sacca (pronounced, “sachcha”) is the Truth of Suffering; sacca is truth.
§ “Pīlana” (pronounced as “peelana”) is the Pāli (and Sinhala) word for distress, or hardship.
This is part of the suffering we undergo even without realizing.
§ “Peleema” is the Sinhala word for distress, or hardship, where the first part “pe” rhymes like
“pen”.
This is the kind of meditation (contemplation) one needs to do initially, even before starting on the
Ariya Ānāpānasati bhāvanā. I cannot emphasize enough the importance in understanding the real
message of the Buddha first.
4. Even though we do not realize it, we are stressed out ALL THE TIME, due to our desire to keep
our six senses satisfied. Anyone who has had temporary relief from this incessant distress (pīlana)
via a good meditation program knows this; it is called nirāmisa sukha. It is even more apparent if one
can have a jhānic experience. Only when one gets into a jhānic state (where the focus is held on a
single object) that one realizes that one had been under incessant stress all life.
§ We do not realize this because this is the “baseline” for existence (our “comfort zone”); this is
what we have done over innumerable rebirths.
§ In order to get some relief from this incessant distress, we constantly think about ways to bring
about periods of happiness. We are constantly thinking of ways to get a better house, car, or
zillions of other “things” that are supposed to provide us with happiness, i.e., we are ALWAYS
stressing out in order to adjust this “baseline comfort zone”. We move to a bigger house, buy a
set of new furniture, work harder to get a better job etc.
§ Furthermore, when we go a little bit below the current “comfort level”, we need to do work
(saṅkhāra) to remedy that. For example, when we get hungry, we may have to prepare a meal
or walk/drive to a restaurant to get a meal.
§ Or, we may be sitting at home, satisfied after a meal, but then all of a sudden we again go
“below the comfort level” for no apparent reason; we just become “bored” sitting at home, and
think about going to movie. So, we get in the car drive to a movie theater.
§ I am sure you can think about zillion other things we do all day long.
5. This unending “distresses” belong to one type of dukkha: dukkha dukkha. It is due to the
physical body that we have inherited:
§ Our senses are constantly asking for enjoyment: the eye wants to see beautiful things, the ear
wants to listen to pleasurable sounds, the nose wants to smell nice fragrances, the tongue wants
to taste sumptuous foods, the body wants luxurious touch, and the mind likes to think about
pleasing thoughts.
§ And we get hungry, thirsty, lonely, bored, etc etc.
6. Then we have to things (i.e., work or do saṅkhāra) to satisfy these needs. This is a second type of
dukkha: saṅkhāra dukkha.
§ In addition to doing work going to restaurant, travelling to a cinema, etc, we also need to do a
job to make money for all those activities. This is doing constant work (saṅkhāra) to keep
afloat.
§ Most times, we get one urge on top another: we may want to eat and drink, we may want to
watch a movie, but also may want company (gather friends).
§ We do not realize this suffering because our minds are focused on the end result, the
pleasure we get after doing all that work.
§ You may be thinking, “What is he talking about? Isn’t this what the life is supposed to be?”.
Exactly! We do not even realize this, because this is our “baseline” of existence. We have done
this over and over extending to beginning-less time, and we PERCEIVE this to be “normal”.
7. What we perceive as happiness actually comes from the relief we get when the distress level is
subdued via our efforts. All we do is to suppress the incessant “imbalances”. This is illustrated by the
following example:
§ We naturally get hungry and thirsty, which are two main “pīlana” that we cannot avoid as long
as we have this physical body.
§ However, when we eat and drink, that leads to a sense of happiness. But we never think that
this “happiness” actually arose due to an inevitable distress.
§ If we cannot find water when we get thirsty, that will lead to real suffering. At that point a glass
water will tasty heavenly. However, after drinking a glass or two, we will not be able to enjoy
drinking any more water.
§ That “happiness” actually arose when getting rid of the pīlana due to thirst.
8. The reality is that no matter what we do to please the senses, those pleasing moments are limited,
and if you think carefully, they do not arise without “pīlana” or an inherent distress associated with
the body. Even if we can maintain that sense input for long times, the senses get tired after a while,
and ask for a different kind of experience. Let us look at some examples:
§ When we are in a warm climate, we are overjoyed to be in an air-conditioned room. But that
would not like to be in an air-conditioned room in the middle of winter in Alaska; rather we
would like the room to be warmed up. The “happiness” is not associated with cold or hot air;
we will feel happy when we remove “pīlana” or the discomfort/distress for the body by cooling
or warming the environment.
§ We can be lying in the most comfortable bed, but sooner or later, we start shifting and rolling
trying to find a better posture, and eventually cannot stay in bed anymore.
§ The most beautiful scenery can be watched only for so long, and would get bored. Joy of sex is
gone once satisfied, and that urge will not arise until at a later time again.
9. Then there is a third type of suffering called viparināma dukkha. That is also associated with
the body, but is due to “unexpected changes” and “eventual death”; this is called “viparināma“
dukkha.
§ For example, we can get injured in accidents or we can come down with a major illness like
cancer.
§ This is the suffering that is easy to see.
§ All three types of suffering are associated with the anicca nature.
10. In summary, out of the three types of suffering, we really notice (and worry about) only the
viparināma dukkha.
§ One may not even notice the other two types of suffering. They are masked by our perceived
“happiness” that is actually rooted in suffering itself. Especially those of us who are born with
reasonable level of wealth can overcome both easily.
§ We get to eat before we become really hungry and it becomes painful. Furthermore, we don’t
need to go hunting and kill an animal to eat; we can go to a restaurant and have a nice meal.
§ Therefore, those two types of sufferings are really hidden from us. But we know that there are
many who really feel such suffering, and that in future lives we are likely to face them too.
11. The worse part is that in the lowest four realms, beings become truly helpless. There is very
little a being can do (saṅkhāra) in order to make amends for the incessant dukkha dukkha in
those realms.
§ For example, a wild animal has very few choices when it gets hungry. If food is not found, it
will go hungry for days with much suffering and eventually become prey to a stronger animal
when it gets weak.
§ In the wild, you do not see any old, sick animals; just as they get weak, they are eaten by
bigger, stronger animals. This is the true meaning of anatta; one becomes truly helpless,
especially in those lower realms.
12. There is nowhere in the 31 realms where dukkha is absent. The three types of dukkha are present
in the 31 realms in varying degrees:
§ In the lowest realm, the nirayas, dukkha dukkha is predominant; there is only suffering, and no
way to get relief by doing saṅkhāra. Even in the animal realm there is relative little saṅkhāra
dukkha; they just suffer directly as pointed out above.
§ In the higher realms (above the human realm), there is very little dukkha dukkha because those
are “good births” that originated due to meritorious kamma. In these higher realms, it is the
viparināma dukkha that ends the life there. Also, any Brahma has not overcome suffering in the
lowest four realms in the future, unless the Sotāpanna stage has been attained.
§ It is in the human realm that all three types of dukkha are present at significant levels; also, the
saṅkhāra dukkha is highest compared to all the realms.
13. This is the First Noble Truth, Dukkha Sacca, that there is hidden dukkha even in bouts of apparent
happiness, and that there is no place within the 31 realms where dukkha can be overcome
permanently.
3.3.2.5 How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā
1. Many people tell me, “I think I understand what anicca means. But then what?”.
§ That statement itself says that person has not yet understood anicca at least to some extent. I am
not saying this in a derogatory manner. Even a Sotāpanna is supposed to have comprehended
anicca only to a certain extent. Thus if one gets at least a glimpse of what is meant by anicca,
that goes a long way. And that is not hard, if one can just contemplate on it.
§ Reading and learning about anicca and experiencing anicca saññā are two different things.
First, it is a good idea to figure out what saññā is; see, “Saññā – What It Really Means“.
§ One really needs to contemplate on the anicca nature with real examples from one’s own life to
get that anicca saññā to sink in one’s mind.
2. It is true that a Buddha is needed to first point out the basic truth about this world, i.e., “that we
cannot maintain anything in this world to our satisfaction”. But once told, it is not difficult to see the
truth of it by just critically evaluating that statement.
§ If one CAN maintain ANYTHING to one’s satisfaction, that HAS TO BE one’s own body and
mind: “This is my body and these are my thoughts”. Therefore, one should start by
contemplating on one’s own body and mind.
3. Close your eyes and try to fix your mind on something, your wife, husband, friend, house, anything
at all. Can you keep your thoughts on that one subject for any significant time?
§ It is not possible to do that. Our minds like to wander off, seeking “more enticing thought
objects”. You will notice that it is even harder when one’s mind is excited, for example, when
one has seen an attractive object or when one has done something strenuous and one is
breathing hard (in the first case, kamachanda nivarana is strong and in the second case
uddhacca nivarana or the “excitability” is high).
§ Thus when one’s mind is calm it is a bit easier to keep the mind on something, but still not for
too long.
4. It is important to verify for oneself about these examples. Buddha Dhamma is to be experienced,
not just to read about.
§ One can cultivates wisdom only by “verifying for oneself that what the Buddha said is indeed
true”. Blind faith will not get anyone close to the truth. Thus true meditation is to learn the true
and pure Dhamma and critically evaluate it based on one’s own experiences.
5. Once we confirm that indeed one is unable to even keep one’s own mind to the way one wants, the
next step is to think about whether one can maintain one’s own body the way one likes.
§ It is quite obvious that we cannot change our basic body features like height, the color of the
skin or the hair, etc. Furthermore, if one is born blind or without a limb, there is nothing much
one can do about that either. Thus to a major extent, we just have to live with the body that we
were born with.
6. Next, consider the body that we have at the present time, and see whether we will be able to
maintain it like that, if we like that appearance.
§ Of course we can do that for a while, especially if one is young. But it is inevitable that there
comes a time when one will not be able to do that. One can verify that by looking at one’s own
parents and grandparents: look at their old pictures and see how young and vibrant they were
back when they were at your age.
§ Therefore, we need to contemplate on the fact that we cannot even maintain things that we
consider as “our own” to our satisfaction in the long run. This is to help cultivate the “anicca
saññā” to a large extent.
7. Contrary to those who believe that thinking along these lines is “depressing”, it can be actually
liberating to realize the truth. It is those who just keep on trying to “patching up one’s losing body
assets” by artificial means end up “highly depressed” at the end, and then even commit suicide. It is
better to have thought about “inevitabilities of life” ahead of the time.
§ If one contemplates deep enough, one realizes that no matter how much money one can throw
at such problems, in the end one will become helpless. Just think about any of the old movie
stars, beauty queens, bodybuilders, politicians, kings, emperors, etc and see how they died
helplessly at the end.
§ Each person dies helplessly at old age or die unexpectedly of an accident or a major illness.
There is nothing that can be called “graceful death”. It may seem to outsiders that “one is aging
gracefully”, but that person knows how hard it is, even if at normal health. One simply cannot
do things the way once one did them and one cannot enjoy any sense pleasure at the same level.
All our sense faculties degrade with time.
8. This was the basic message of the Buddha, and it is not something he made up. He just revealed
that truth about the nature of this world, of which any normal person would not think about on
himself/herself. We are too busy enjoying sense pleasures (or trying to get possession of enjoyable
objects), even to take time to think about it.
§ The Buddha also showed that unless we do something about it, this is what we will be doing
forever in the future. We will be reborn and will go through the same cycle over and over. It is
actually much worse, since most births in this cycle of rebirths is in the lower four realms
where the hardships and sufferings are much higher.
§ More importantly, he revealed a way to get rid of this cycle of births wrought with suffering.
9. The Buddha explained that the reason that we keep coming back to this world is the fact that we
don’t realize “this unsatisfactory nature”. No matter how much suffering we go through, we always
think we can overcome them (and sometimes we do, but at the end we all die). We have the wrong
perception that somehow we can “beat the system”, i.e., attain happiness and MAINTAIN that
happiness. We have the incorrect “nicca saññā“.
§ He said as long as we have this “nicca saññā” we can never escape future suffering. The
solution is embedded in that first truth about suffering (Dukkha Sacca, the suffering that can be
eliminated): What we need to do is to fully realize the “anicca nature” of this world, that “we
cannot maintain anything to our satisfaction in the long run”.
§ The fact that most people do not realize is that the mere change of perception can lift a
heavy load that one has been carrying. This is the basis of “nirāmisa sukha“.
§ That does not mean one will give up trying to give up everything and go to a forest; see, “If
Everything is Anicca Should We Just give up Everything?“.
10. When we have this wrong “nicca saññā“, we willingly embrace this world, and that is
“paṭicca” (“pati” + “icca“, where “pati” is bind and “icca” means willingly). When that happens,
“sama uppada” (where “sama” is similar and “uppada” means birth) follows inevitably; see, “Paṭicca
Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ Thus, we will be born in whatever the type of existence that we craved for.
§ But that does not mean if we crave for a human rebirth we will get that. Rather the birth is
according to “gathi“, the key aspects of one’s mindset. If one is excessively greedy, one may be
born in the realm of “hungry ghosts”; if one is excessively angry or hateful, one will be born
where that mindset prevails, i.e, in the niraya (hell).
§ To put it another way, when one has the wrong “nicca saññā” one tends to do immoral things to
get what one perceives to provide sense pleasures. Then those kamma vipāka will lead to worse
existences in the future both in this life and more importantly in future lives.
11. As one cultivates the “anicca saññā“, one begins to stay away from the ten immoral actions more
and more due to clear comprehension that such actions are unfruitful.
§ What is the point of stealing money at the expense of others and acquiring a “good lifestyle”
that will last only 100 years at most? And one will have to pay that with interest?
§ What is the point of verbally abusing someone for a momentary satisfaction, if that will only
hurt oneself at the end (even just by leaving oneself agitated, let alone those kamma vipāka that
will come down later)? If one can stop with effort such an incident, then one can look back and
see the “cooling down” that resulted from that effort. This is what “ānāpāna” or “satipaṭṭhāna”
is all about.
§ Even if someone physically hurt you, what is the point in hitting back? Will you feel
PHYSICALLY better by hurting that person? Will your bodily pain go away? By the way, that
also did not happen without a cause; it was a result of a bad kamma done sometime back (a
kamma vipāka).
§ By the way, kamma vipāka are not guaranteed. One can avoid many kamma vipāka by not
allowing conditions for them to take place; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined
by Kamma?“. Thus when one lives life with “sati“, many such kamma vipāka can be avoided.
12. It may take some contemplation to sort these out, but one always has to look at the broader
picture. Ignorance is not being aware of the “whole picture”. We tend to act impulsively with what is
discerned at that moment. But that tendency will diminish when one cultivates the “anicca saññā“.
§ Acting with “sati” or “being mindful” is being mindful of the “anicca nature of this world”.
This is the basis of both “ānāpāna” and “satipaṭṭhāna“.
§ Nibbāna or “cooling down” can be experienced in this very life by cultivating the “anicca
saññā” and thus be motivated to strive harder; see, “Living Dhamma“.
Next, “How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā – II“,………..
3.3.2.6 How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā – II
1. Saññā is normally translated as “perception”, but it has a much deeper meaning; see, “Saññā –
What It Really Means“ and the first part of the current post, “How to Cultivate Anicca Sanna“.
Anicca saññā has many different aspects, and in this and the next post we will discuss some of these
deeper aspects.
§ When reading about it, it may make sense that anicca means, “that we cannot maintain
anything to our satisfaction”. And from the examples given, one can see that truth of that
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 149
statement. But that is just the start. One just has just been informed of what anicca is. Now
one has to “see it with wisdom”, in order to get to the Sotāpanna stage. This is what is called
“dassanena pahathabba” or “start seeing things as they are”.
§ One needs to develop the “anicca saññā“; the mind needs to grasp the essence or the correct
perception of what anicca implies. Book knowledge is one thing, and “grasping it with the
mind” is much more deeper.
§ In the previous post we determined that it is not possible to keep to our satisfaction what we
think of as ours, our bodies and our thoughts; see, “How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā“.
2. When contemplating on external objects, there are many “levels of saññā“: the more one KNOWS
about a given object, one tends to cultivate a “better saññā” about it.
§ Let us take an example to illustrate this important difference. Suppose a person from a remote
region in the Amazon forest, who has never seen an apple, is shown an apple. He would not
know what it is. If we give him the apple to hold and teach him the word “apple”, now he
knows what an apple is, but only in the sense that if he is shown an apple again, he will say
“that is an apple”. But he would still not know how it tastes. He will have to eat some apples to
get an idea of its flavor. He may still not know how to identify a “ripened apple” that will taste
better, etc. All that comes when he gets to experience apples at various stages of “ripeness” and
even different varieties.
§ All those different aspects of an apple needs to be experienced in order to really get the saññā
about an apple. Only then that one can picture an apple, know what it feels like to hold it, how
it tastes, etc. At the mention of the word “apple” all that instantly comes to that person’s mind.
3. In another example, if we see someone at work regularly at a distance, we can recognize him as X
if we meet him at the market. But we would not know much ABOUT him. However, if we get to
associate with him and start doing things together, pretty soon we will know much more about him.
§ At that point, when we even catch a glimpse of him, everything about him comes to our mind.
If we wanted, we can recall how many kids he has, where he went school, etc.
§ Thus “saññā” can be at different levels. The more one gets to associate with someone or
something, then our “saññā” on that person or concept will grow.
§ However, it is possible that our “saññā” about person X may not be really correct. One
day, police find video evidence that X is a child molester, and it becomes clear that there is no
doubt about it. At that moment, our “saññā” or perception about X is altered permanently. We
will no longer let him even come close to our children.
4. The Buddha said our “saññā” about “this world” — that it can provide happiness — is a
“vipareetha saññā“, i.e., it is a distorted or wrong perception. If one carefully examines the rebirth
process in the 31 realms, that wrong peception has provided us with mostly suffering in the long run.
§ When we realize the “anicca nature” of this world to some extent, our wrong perception will
change. That is when one really sees “Sammā Diṭṭhi” or “correct vision” about this world. One
becomes a Sotāpanna.
§ Just like a fish does not see the “hidden hook” and that it will undergo unbearable suffering by
biting the tasty worm, we normally do not “see” the suffering hidden in the “tasty materialistic
things”. A fish will never be able to figure that out, and as normal human beings we
cannot figure it out ON OUR OWN either. Only a Buddha can figure it out, and a Buddha
can TEACH us, and we can figure it out by spending some time contemplating on it.
5. Therefore, one should not be discouraged if one does not even realize “what the big deal is” about
anicca. Like everything else, understanding comes with repeated application and by thinking about it.
If one can see that “it makes sense” to say, “anicca describes the inability for us to maintain anything
to our satisfaction in the long term” that is a good start. Then one should start checking the validity of
that concept at every opportunity in real life.
§ Also, anicca is not merely, “the inability for us to maintain anything to our satisfaction in the
long term”. There are many other implications that arise because of this characteristic of
anicca. Another way the Buddha described anicca was to use the term “atteeyathi“; i.e., “it
is like a dog chewing on a meatless bone”. The dog thinks very highly of the bone, and values
its “taste”. But there is not even any real taste in that bone. It is taste that is made up by the
mind, but sometimes, its gums start bleeding and it may taste its own blood.
§ Various aspects of anicca are discussed at: “Anicca – True Meaning“.
6. Just like a dog will spend hours and hours chewing its “highly valued” bone, we also give much
value to sense pleasures that are fleeting in nature. We do get brief instances of real pleasure, but we
do not realize the effort and suffering that we go through to get that brief sense of pleasure.
Most of the time, the pleasure is a “pleasure of anticipation”. We trudge through hard work with the
mind cheering on showing the “possible pleasures to be had”.
§ The Buddha likened this to a cow (in the old days) who drags a heavy cart with eagerness to get
to the pile of straw being held in front of it by a pole. It does not realize the futility of its efforts
because it is only thinking about the “prize” being held in front of its eyes. It does not even feel
the burden of the heavy load, or even if feeling it, just disregards that pain in anticipation of the
“reward” that it thinks can be had by “just taking a few more steps”.
§ Most of our pleasures are short lived and arise just out of putting down the “fires” or distresses.
The water tastes best when we are thirsty. Think about how you felt when you were very
thirsty; the first sip of water was heavenly. But as the thirst went down with drinking more
water, the “sense of pleasure” went down as well. After at most two glasses, the “feeling of
pleasure” turns to a discomfort.
7. Same thing applies in any of the sense pleasures. We are constantly under pressure from the mind
to “provide relief to one or another sense faculty”; this is dukkha dukkha that we discussed elsewhere.
If we have not eaten anything for a while, we get the urge to eat something tasty. If we have not
listened to some good music for a while, that urge kicks in. If you think about any sense pleasure, this
is true.
§ Many people value sex very highly. But how long can one keep that pleasure going? Most of
the sexual pleasure is gained by just thinking about it; it is mostly mind-made. One needs to
think about this carefully. How much time does one spend “fantasizing” versus “actually
having sex”?
§ Even if we eat the most delicious food in the whole world, it will not taste good after the
stomach gets full.But we keep thinking about that “great experience” of eating that meal many
times afterwards. Then we form an urge to do it again.
§ This “feeling of unsatisfactoriness” or even feeling of “something is missing” is “atteeyathi“.
The dog may get tired of chewing the bone and may leave it alone, but after a while the urge
comes back and he is at it again.
8. Even if we are fully content and lying on a comfortable couch, we may get a “feeling of
unfulfillment”, that something is “missing”. We then get the idea, “to go and watch a movie” or to
“drop by a friend’s place to chat”. Then we have to get in the car and drive there. We do not even feel
the burden associated with getting dressed and driving because our minds are focused on the pleasure
of “watching the movie” or “having a good time with the friend”. And after that session, we have to
drive back and if it was a bad movie we might even get a bit depressed.
§ This is “atteeyathi“. Just like a dog that incessantly is chewing on a dry bone to get a mental
satisfaction and eventually gets tired doing it, this is what we have been doing life after life (if
born in the human realm). Many people eventually realize this at old age, but then it could be
too late to do anything about it.
§ As one gets old, the ability to derive pleasure from such activities goes down. If you have
friends, relatives, parents, or grandparents who had enjoyed life at younger age, but now are in
distressful situations it is easy to see what happened to them over the years. Now they do not
have the energy to try to do all those activities and even if they do to some extent, their sense
faculties have degraded to the point of not providing much sense pleasures.
§ But most people still keep thinking back about the pleasures they had when they were young.
This may even prompt them to seek ways to “somehow get those experiences back”. And when
that fails depression sets in.
9. As the mind realizes the burdens of the “incessant distress”, and that one has endured all that for no
real benefit, it will gladly give up those burdens and the mind will start losing those cravings
automatically. This is the key to “giving up unnecessary attachments”; see, “The Incessant Distress
(“Pilana”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca“.
§ That post discusses how we encounter suffering when anicca inevitably leads to unexpected
“changes” in things we value; this is viparinama dukkha. We encounter more suffering by
trying to overcome the effects due to viparinama dukkha by doing more saṅkhāra, and that is
saṅkhāra dukkha. And if we do “bad types of saṅkhāra” or apuññabhi saṅkhāra, they lead to
rebirths in realms where direct suffering or dukkha dukkha is unbearable. Thus all types of
sufferings eventually arise due to anicca.
10. Those are key concept to meditate (or contemplate) on. This is real vipassana bhāvanā.
§ However, it is important to make sure one starts abstaining from at the least the conventional
five precepts and possibly the “BIG EIGHT” discussed in the “2. The Basics in Meditation“.
Otherwise, the mind will not be calm enough to grasp these concepts. The difference between
“book knowledge” and “developing anicca saññā” will become slowly clear as one proceeds.
§ That is why reading, listening, and contemplating on Dhamma concepts is so crucial. This is
one component of the Saptha Bojjanga (dhamma vicaya) and one of the Satara Iddhipada
(vimansa). When concepts become clear, one will automatically develop anicca saññā.
§ And with time, one will be able to grasp it better. One will “start feeling” things in one’s own
body; see, “11. Magga Phala and Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ This is a process that goes all the way to the Arahanthood. It is said that one truly understands
anicca only at the Arahant stage. But our goal here is to at least to get to the Sotāpanna stage.
And that CAN BE DONE in this very life, as I discussed my own experience in the above post.
11. Finally, if anyone has spent long times — may be years — meditating on “impermanence”
without results, it would be worthwhile to spend some time meditating on the “anicca” nature. I know
by experience that will make a big difference if one does it right.
§ I spent 4-5 years contemplating on wrong anicca, dukkha, and anatta (and a few other things
like the wrong ānāpāna sati bhāvanā). I really believe that the very first desanā that exposed
me to correct interpretation of anicca, dukkha, anatta changed my progress instantaneously. It
was a profound effect.
§ It is also important to realize that what ultimately matters is not just a “good feeling” or even
getting to jhānās, but whether one has removed “gathi” suitable to be born in the apāyas. Thus
one should be able to look back at one’s life and see significant improvements in getting rid of
greed, hate, ignorance; see, “Transition to Noble Eightfold Path“.
Next, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – According to Some Key Suttas“…….
3.3.2.7 If Everything is Anicca Should We Just give up Everything?
1. Anicca means “we cannot maintain anything to our satisfaction in the LONG RUN”. The time
scale of existence is an important factor when we contemplate the significance and implications of
this fundamental characteristic of nature.
§ So, the question is, “if nothing can be maintained to our satisfaction, what is the point in
spending so much time in learning, getting a decent job, making plans for businesses, etc.?”.
The question seems to be reasonable until we look at the “big picture”.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
152 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
2. During the life, we do see many instances where we can attain certain things (pass exams, get jobs,
initiate successful businesses, have a comfortable life, etc) and be happy about such achievements; of
course there are many times we encounter unexpected things too (coming down with health
problems, traffic accidents, floods, hurricanes, loss of jobs, etc).
§ That is the nature of existence as a human. It is a mixed bag, at least until we get to the old age;
then it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain things (especially our bodies) to our
satisfaction, and of course at death we have to leave everything behind whether we like it or
not.
§ In the realms above the human in fact, life is even more predictable and enjoyable, that is of
course until death comes calling.
§ But the real problems encountered in the four realms below the human realm. It is increasingly
difficult to “maintain things to one’s satisfaction” in lower realms. Animals are truly helpless,
especially the vast majority that lives in the wild. There are no “old animals” in the wild; they
either get sick and die or even worse: they get eaten up as soon as they slow down a bit.
§ There is no happiness at all in the lowest realm, the niraya (“ni”+”ra” means without ANY
happiness).
3. Thus the main reason why “we cannot maintain things to our satisfaction in the LONG RUN” is
because all beings spend most of their lives in the lower four realms; see, “How the Buddha
Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm”.
4. Now we can examine the question in terms of this “big picture”. If we do give up everything, we
will probably die a miserable death (because we will be poor, unhealthy, etc because we would not be
able to even support ourselves), and be born most likely in a lower realm. That it will make the
situation much worse.
§ We do need to contemplate on this situation. If one thinks through this line of thoughts, one can
see that one is really helpless in this cycle of rebirths, which is the third characteristic of
existence, anatta. Until a Buddha comes to this world and shows humans this “big picture”,
AND shows how to get out of it, no one is able to escape this trap.
§ The only solution is to at least attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna in this life. We MAY
have some kammic energy left for one or more human lives (see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of
Existence and Births Therein”), but this COULD BE the last for a long while, which could be
billions of years. Even if we get another human birth, we do not know under what
circumstances; it could be somewhere Buddha Dhamma is not readily accessible.
5. There is another point that we need to consider regarding this question. We have become indebted
to numerous beings in this journey of rebirths, and thus we have debts to pay back. Having all these
debts is a hindrance to attain any stage of Nibbāna; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation”.
6. Therefore, instead of abandoning our families (to whom we owe the most), we need to do our
utmost to make sure they are well-off. We also need to make sure that we do not become dependent
on the society (and thus accumulate more debt). Even in this life, we depend on others for so many
things: we are indebted to our teachers, friends, as well to many unknown people who contribute to
providing us with essentials to sustain life; we all are interconnected, and have responsibilities for
each other. We have “to do our part” to live in a society.
§ Therefore, part of the solution is to first prepare oneself (or one’s children if one is a parent)
with a good education so that supporting oneself (and a family) is possible. Furthermore, a
good education helps with understanding Dhamma too. And if one can make a lot of money (by
honest means) then one can do many meritorious deeds too, thereby helping oneself spiritually
as well.
§ In any case, giving up everything and hiding in a forest will not solve the problem of existence.
But there are some who have a sansāric tendency to abandon the “householder life”. What I am
saying here is for the majority of people, not for everyone: Of course we need to sustain the
bhikkhus who spend all their time for the benefit of others as well as themselves.
7. Therefore, what needs to be done is to understand the true nature of existence and realize that the
ONLY solution is to try the best to attain at least the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna. Then one becomes
free of rebirths in the lower four realms forever. This is THE solution to the problem.
In order to do that we need to,
1. Fulfil our obligations to our families, friends, and the society in general,
2. Make our best effort to learn pure Dhamma and attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
When one does this, one will become happy, not depressed, about the outlook. One has understood
the problem and knows what to do about it. And when one starts working on it, one’s confidence will
grow because one can feel the difference in oneself. One will become even more determined AND
energetic, not just to save oneself, but also to help out the others.
Next, “The Incessant Distress (“Pilana”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca“, ……….
3.3.3 Anattā – A Systematic Analysis
The Pāli word anattā has a mundane meaning and a deeper meaning. The deeper meaning is
discussed in a series of posts in a systematic manner.
Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma
Anatta – No Refuge in This World
Dasa Akusala and Anatta – The Critical Link
Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?
Anattā (Mundane Interpretation) – No “Unchanging Self”
3.3.3.1 Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma
May 31, 2019
1. Attā is a Pāli word with two basic meanings that are very different and depend on the context.
§ In the conventional sense, “attā” just means “a person” like calling someone “John”. In rural
Sri Lanka, to refer to someone, one could say “this attā” (මේඇත්තාor මේඅත්තා) just like we
say “this person”.
§ The deeper meaning of “atta” is “full control” and “with substance”.
§ If one is in full control of SOMETHING, that THING can be called his or her attā. If
something is not under full and complete control that is anattā.
§ This is related to the key concepts of “anattā” and “anatta” (one of the three characteristics of
Nature or Tilakkhaṇa); see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“. “Anatta” is having “no control” and
“without substance” or “without essence”.
2. Therefore, we need to be able to determine which “attā” is meant based on the context where the
word is used.
§ For example, “bear” refers to the large animal in “I saw a bear” but in “to bear a burden” it
has a completely different meaning.
§ Let us clarify those two meanings of attā directly using the Tipiṭaka.
3. The usage of “attā” in the mundane sense is clearly seen in the famous Dhammapada verse; see,
“Attā Hi Attanō Nāthō“. There “attā” refers to “any person”. It just says that each person has strive
for his/her own salvation (Nibbāna). Even the Buddha can only teach the way.
§ Another is “attānaṃ damayanti panditā“, which means, “a wise person would
control/discipline oneself“. This is in Dhammapada verse 80.
4. The second and deeper meaning of “attā” (or actually of opposite of “attā” or “anattā”) was
described by the Buddha in his second discourse delivered after attaining the Buddhahood.
The second discourse, “WebLink: suttacentral: Anattalakkhana Sutta (SN 22.59)” starts with the
verse: “Rūpaṃ, bhikkhave, anattā. Rūpañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ rūpaṃ
ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca rūpe: ‘evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī’ti.
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ anattā, tasmā rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati rūpe:
‘evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī’ti.
§ Translated: “Bhikkhus, form (physical body) is anattā (or not attā). For if, bhikkhus, if one’s
body is attā, one would have full control over it, and it would be possible to say: ‘Let my body
be like this; let my body not be like this.’ But because the body is anattā, it is subjected to
decay and disease, and it is not possible to have it the way one desires: ‘Let my body be this
way; let my body not be this way”.
5. The verse in #4 is a very important because it clearly describes what is meant by attā and anattā in
the deeper sense: Attā would be one in full control. If one has full control of something, one would be
able to maintain it to the way one wants.
§ For example, we like to think that if we “own” something we should be able to “have full
control” over it. But we know that is not the case (cars, houses, anything we own evolve in their
own way. Even though things like gold jewellery are stable, we will lose control over them
when we die).
§ Specifically, if one’s body is attā, one should be able to make it the way one would like it to be:
say, strong, healthy, and handsome/beautiful; one would be able to maintain it without catching
any disease or injuries; furthermore, one would be able to make it live forever. But our bodies
evolve in their own way. No matter how hard we try, they age, decay, and die.
6. This is emphasized in the another verse in that sutta: “Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ
niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti? “Aniccaṃ, bhante”. “Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vā taṃ sukhaṃ vā”ti?
“Dukkhaṃ, bhante”.
Translated: ““What do you think, bhikkhus, can one’s body be maintained to one’s liking or
not?”—“not possible, bhante.”—“Does that lead to suffering or happiness?”—“Suffering, bhante”.
§ As we have seen before, it is the anicca nature (inability to satisfy one’s desires/expectations)
that leads to suffering; see, “Anicca – Inability to Keep What We Like“.
§ We encounter such suffering whenever something that we own breaks down (houses, cars, etc)
and when people we love get sick or die. However, the worst suffering is when we ourselves
get sick or when we face death ourselves. This is expressed in the next part of the above verse.
7. The verse continues: “Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vipariṇāmadhammaṃ, kallaṃ nu taṃ
samanupassituṃ: ‘etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante”.
Translated: ““If something cannot be maintained to one’s liking, if it undergoes unexpected change,
and lead to suffering, is it appropriate to say: ‘This is mine, this I am, this is my attā (my
essence)’?”—“No, bhante.”
§ Now we are getting to the deeper aspect. If X owns a car, X would say, “this car is mine“. If
that car breaks down, X will become unhappy (suffer).
§ However, X will never says, “this car is me, this is my attā (my essence)”.
§ On the other hand, X is likely to say, “this body is me, this is my attā (my essence)”.
8. What the Buddha logically pointed out in the above section of the verse is since one’s body also
cannot be maintained to one’s liking, since it undergoes unexpected change, and since leads to
suffering, is it NOT appropriate to say: ‘This is mine, this I am, this is my attā (my essence)” about
one’s body too.
10. There is nothing in a “living being” that is not included in the five aggregates. Since one does
not have any real control over any of them, none of them can be called one’s attā.
§ Therefore, there is NOTHING that can be called one’s own, and thus can be maintained to
one’s liking, For example, one does not have any control over WHERE one will be reborn.
§ That is dictated by Paṭicca Samuppāda, and most rebirths are the lower realms with much
suffering. Thus one is truly helpless or anattā.
11. This can be expressed by saying one has “no real intrinsic essence”, “one is helpless in the long
run”, “all struggles for a permanent happiness will go to naught”, etc. Even if one lives a perfect and
healthy life, one WILL become helpless at death, with the future totally uncertain.
§ This is why a living being is ALWAYS subjected to the anatta nature. Note that “rūpaṃ
anattā” refers to the fact that one’s body cannot be one’s attā, and that anatta (without the long
“a”) is a characteristic of the Nature.
§ Realizing this particular aspect of anatta Nature, i.e., that one’s five aggregates are not be
taken as “one’s own” is the removal of sakkāya diṭṭhi.
12. Now we can see how this concept of anattā is clearly opposite to the concept of a “soul” in
Abrahamic religions or the concept of an “ātma” (pronounced “āthma”) in Hinduism. Thus,
according to those religions, there is an attā which is the “soul” or the “ātma“.
§ In the case of Abrahamic religions, one’s goal is to “purify” one’s soul and make it got to
heaven where one will live forever.
§ In the case of Hinduism, the goal is to merge one’s ātma with the Mahā Brahma, and again be
in that brahma realm forever.
§ However, the Buddha stated that there is no realm in this world that has a permanent existence
like that.
§ This concept of an “everlasting identity” or a “soul” or an “ātma” is referred to as the
“sassatavāda” in the Tipiṭaka. [sassatavāda :[m.] eternalism.]
13. Those who do not believe in rebirth say that a “person” exists only as long as his/her body is
alive. When one dies, that identity is terminated. Most scientists today seem to believe in this idea:
There is nothing that is “carried over” to a next life. This concept (or argument) is called the
“uccedavāda” in the Tipiṭaka. [uccheda :[m.] cutting off; perishing; annihilation.]
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
156 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ But the Buddha explained that the real nature lies in between those two extreme views. Any
“living being” exists as an ever-changing lifestream and that “lifestream” is carried over to a
new life. But there is NOTHING that remains the SAME in that lifestream. The next life could
be VERY DIFFERENT from the current life; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a
Lifestream“.
§ The next life is determined by the root causes and conditions that exist at the moment of
leaving the current existence (cuti-paṭisandhi moment) based on Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ A second key meaning of anatta is discussed at, “Anatta – No Refuge in This World“.
3.3.3.2 Anatta – No Refuge in This World
June 7, 2019
§ In the same way, Anattalakkhana Sutta introduced the term anatta which highlights the fact
that one is unable to maintain even things one perceives to be “one’s own” like one’s physical
body or one’s mental faculties (vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa); see, “Anattā in
Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“.
§ Of course, those two aspects are related: since one does not have complete control over
ANYTHING, one will not be able to maintain things to one’s liking and will inevitably
subjected to suffering in the rebirth process.
Anatta – Becoming Helpless in the Rebirth Process
4. In this post we will discuss another aspect of the anatta nature: how one becomes helpless
(anatta) in the long-term. That is another meaning of anatta, sometimes written as anattha. (The
Tipitaka was written down in Pāli, but with Sinhala script; see, “Historical Background“. The word
“anatta” was written as අනත්ත. Sometimes –especially to provide the meaning that we are
discussing now — it is also written as අනත්ථ and that we write here as “anattha“).
§ The Pāli word “attha” could mean “the truth” or “having refuge” or “meaningful” depending on
the context. The opposites of “untruth” or “helpless” or “meaningless/unprofitable” is indicated
by the word “anattha“.
§ When one does not really comprehend the anicca nature (that it is not possible to get what one
wants AND keep it that way), one would be tempted to try to get one wants by any means
necessary. This is when one starts engaging in immoral deeds.
§ This is when one sets up causes and conditions to bring so much suffering in the future that will
lead to becoming truly helpless (anattha) via bad rebirths due to bad kamma.
§ Therefore, knowing the first meaning of anatta is not enough; one needs to comprehend the
second, related meaning and work diligently to avoid dasa akusala. This is discussed below.
5. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Adhamma Sutta (AN 10.113)“, the Buddha succinctly
states what dhamma/adhamma and attha/anattha are:
“Katamo ca, bhikkhave, adhammo ca anattho ca? Micchādiṭṭhi, micchāsaṅkappo, micchāvācā,
micchākammanto, micchāājīvo, micchāvāyāmo, micchāsati, micchāsamādhi, micchāñāṇaṃ,
micchāvimutti—ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, adhammo ca anattho ca“, AND
“Katamo ca, bhikkhave, dhammo ca attho ca? Sammādiṭṭhi, sammāsaṅkappo, sammāvācā,
sammākammanto, sammāājīvo, sammāvāyāmo, sammāsati, sammāsamādhi, sammāñāṇaṃ,
sammāvimutti—ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, dhammo ca attho ca“.
§ Basically, “dhamma” are those thoughts, speech, and actions that are for the benefit of oneself.
One who engages in those are engaged in fruitful/meaningful things and will lead to one’s
refuge (“attha“). As we can see this encompasses the Noble Eightfold Path followed by sammā
ñāṇa and sammā vimutti (i.e., Arahanthood).
§ The opposites or “adhamma” are those thoughts, speech, and actions that lead to much future
suffering. One who engages in those are engaged in unfruitful/immoral things and those will
lead to one becoming helpless in the rebirth process (“anattha“).
6. Another way to express the same idea is to say that one who is engaged in dasa akusala
(adhamma) will become helpless in the rebirth process (anattha); see, “Dasa Akusala and Anatta –
The Critical Link“.
One who is engaged in the opposites of dasa kusala (dhamma) will have refuge in the rebirth process
(attha) and will become free of future suffering by becoming an Arahant.
§ Many key suttas stating these “core facts” about Buddha Dhamma are listed in “Anguttara
Nikāya – Suttā on Key Concepts“.
7. Therefore, we see that the first meaning of anatta is of “theoretical nature”: It states that one will
never have full control over one’s affairs in the long run, and thus one is bound becomes helpless in
the rebirth process.
§ The second meaning provides a practical way out of this dangerous outcome: This special way
to avoid future suffering and to find refuge can only be discovered by a Buddha and it is the
Noble Eightfold Path.
§ In other words, following dhamma to have refuge (attha) instead of following adhamma to
become helpless (anattha).
§ In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamanātha Sutta (AN 10.17)” and “WebLink: suttacentral:
Dutiyanātha Sutta (AN 10.18)“, the Buddha advised bhikkhus to live a moral life in order to
avoid becoming anātha: “Sanāthā, bhikkhave, viharatha, mā anāthā.”
Yadaniccam tam dukkham, tam dukkham tadanatta
8. With this second interpretation, It is easier to see how the anicca nature leads to suffering (dukkha)
and eventually to helplessness (anatta).
§ Any human who has not heard and comprehended to some extent what anicca nature is called
an “assutavā puthujjano“. One who has is called a “sutavā ariyasāvako“. Here sutavā means
“has heard about the true teachings of the Buddha (and comprehended)” and assutavā is of
course one who has not heard/comprehended. [sutavā : 已聞, have heard; assutavā : Not
learned, ignorant, 無聞的、無知的] [See WebLink: suttacentral: AN 5.48
Alabbhanīyaṭhānasutta]
§ If one does not realize that all struggles to achieve a “permanent happiness” is not possible, one
would be doing one’s best to achieve such a state of happiness. This is done by working to
merge one’s soul with a Creator God in heaven or one’s ātma with Mahā Brahma in a brahma
realm. But the Buddha explained that those efforts would be in vain.
9. It is of course necessary to have goals for certain achievements while one is living in this world —
even mundane achievements. For example, one needs to get a good education and a good
employment (and make sure that one’s children will do the same). This is necessary to avoid
suffering in this life.
§ But then one would need to hear about the true nature of this world on a long-term basis: That
life continues after the death of this physical body, and one needs to work towards attaining
some spiritual goals. That will lead to stop suffering in the rebirth process.
§ It is only when one contemplates this “long-term picture” that one can comprehend the anicca
(and dukkha and anatta) nature of this world: No matter how many mundane achievements one
may achieve, one would have to leave all that behind when one dies and then — if fortunate
enough to be born human — re-start the whole process again.
10. Therefore, ignorance of the anicca nature leads to suffering (dukkha).
§ If one tries to attain happiness by doing dasa akusala (which is very likely to happen when the
temptations become high), one would be born in the lower four realms and the suffering will be
much higher. That is when one really becomes helpless (anatta).
This fact is stated repeatedly in many suttas with the succinct statement: “yadaniccam tam dukkham,
tam dukkham tadanatta”.
§ That is a condensed version made to rhyme for easy oral transmission. The complete verse is:
“yad aniccam tam dukkham, tam dukkham tad anatta”,
§ “if something cannot be maintained (or managed depending on the case) to one’s
satisfaction, suffering arises, therefore one is helpless in the end”.
11. The above important verse appears in many suttas in the Saṃyutta Nikāya (Anicca Vagga),
including WebLink: suttacentral: Ajjhattanicca Sutta (SN 35.1), WebLink: suttacentral: Bahiranicca
Sutta (SN 35.4), and WebLink: suttacentral: Yadanicca sutta (SN 22.15), the Buddha stated that the
three characteristics of “this world” (anicca, dukkha, anatta) are RELATED to each other:
§ This statement is applicable in this life. No matter how many
achievements/accomplishments/victories we make in this life, we will have to leave all that
behind when we die.
§ However, the key message of the Buddha was regarding the implications of this statement in
the rebirth process. If one engages in dasa akusala (which is unavoidable if the temptation is
high enough), one is bound to be subjected to much suffering via rebirths in the four lower
realms. That is when one becomes really helpless (anatta).
§ This is why one would need to remove the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi first (mundane Eightfold
Path) in order to understand the fundamentals like the laws of kamma and the validity of the
rebirth process. Only then one can start comprehending the anicca, dukkha, anatta nature and
start on the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and “Mahā Cattārisaka
Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
All Meanings of Anicca/Anatta Self-Consistent
12. All meanings/interpretations of anicca and anatta are inter-related.
§ The first meaning of anatta says that there is no “unchanging essence” in a living being,
controlling its destiny. Everything happens due to causes and conditions even moment-by-
moment Idapaccayā Paṭicca Samuppāda. Then the rebirth process takes place according to
Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda“. Once the basic idea is grasped, one
can follow the steps in “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Overview” to understand things better.
§ This is related to the anicca nature of not being able to maintain anything to one’s liking. One
does not have that ability because one does not have control over anything that one perceives to
be “one’s own”.
§ When one goes against the nature (i.e., do adhamma) and tries to maintain things to one’s
liking, one may do dasa akusala and then be subjected to their bad kamma vipāka. One critical
aspect of this is to have births in the four lower realms where suffering is high. One can avoid
much suffering by grasping this meaning of anatta.
13. There is something that is under our control, even though one has to be really disciplined to make
it to work. This is one’s own gati. One’s destiny is controlled by one’s own gati.
§ Since one’s gati can change any time, those are not fixed. Anyone can decide to change one’s
own gati and work towards a better outcome by rejecting adhamma and adhering to dhamma,
i.e., by following the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change
Habits and Character (Gati)“.
§ But first, one must fully grasp the fundamentals embedded in anicca, dukkha, anatta (and
sometimes asubha is also added to the list).
§ Even before that one must get rid of those 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. For example, one can
never grasp the anicca/anatta nature if one does not believe in rebirth. The whole point is to
stop suffering in future rebirths. Current life has already arisen due to past causes/conditions
and will inevitably lead to decay and death.
3.3.3.3 Dasa Akusala and Anatta – The Critical Link
April 2, 2017; revised November 10, 2017; August 30, 2018; September 1, 2018; June 6, 2019
1. This important post will help make the connection between deeper teaching of the Buddha
Dhamma (anicca, dukkha, anatta) and the practice, i.e., cleansing one’s mind via abstaining from
dasa akusala and cultivating dasa kusala.
§ The Tilakkhaṇa represent the “theory side” or the “nature of this world” and dasa
akusala are associated with the practice. Thus the connection between the two is important.
§ I have not seen this addressed directly, outside of the Tipiṭaka.
2. We discussed in the previous post, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?“, why the Pāli words
“atta/anatta” do not convey “self/no-self” but rather “with essence/no essence” or “truth/untruth” or
“useful/not useful” or “protected/helpless”.
§ We also discussed how “atta/anatta” are closely related to Sanskrit words
“artha/anartha” (අර්ථ/අනර්ථ in Sinhala)also giving the meanings “truth/untruth” or
“useful/not useful”.
§ Finally, we touched on the fact that the anatta (and thus dukkha and anatta) nature is a
manifestation of engaging in dasa akusala.
3. Recently I realized that many suttas in the Anguttara Nikāya (AN) express various concepts in
brief. Many suttas are just a paragraph, providing the key idea; see, “Anguttara Nikāya – Suttā on
Key Concepts“.
§ Here we will discuss three short suttas in the Anguttara Nikāya that can be used to clarify the
connection between dasa akusala and Tilakkhaṇa.
4. First, the Kusala Sutta (WebLink: AN 180; in the Sadhuvagga) is just one paragraph providing the
definition of dasa akusala:
§ “..katamanca bhikkhave, akusalam? pānātipāto, adinnādānaṃ, kāmesumicchācāro, musāvādo,
pisunā vācā, parusā vācā, samphappalāpo, abhijjhā, vyāpādo, micchādiṭṭhi akusalaṃ..”
§ Conventionally translated: “killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, slandering, harsh talk,
empty talk, greed, hate, and wrong views”. These are discussed in “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa
Akusala)“.
§ In the next and last paragraph of the sutta, dasa kusala are defined as the opposites of dasa
akusala (veramani means “abstain from”): “..katamanca bhikkhave, kusalam? pānātipātā
veramani, adinnādānā veramani, kāmesumicchācārā veramani, musāvādā veramani, pisunā
vācā veramani, parusā vācā veramani, samphappalāpā veramani, abhijjhā veramani, vyāpāda
veramani, sammādiṭṭhi kusalaṃ ‘ti.
§ Therefore, kusala and akusala are stated clearly and succinctly in that sutta.
5. Then in the very next sutta, Attha Sutta (WebLink: AN 181; in the Sadhuvagga) anattho is
defined in terms of dasa akusala:
§ “..katamo ca bhikkhave, anattho? pānātipāto, adinnādānaṃ, kāmesumicchācāro, musāvādo,
pisunā vācā, parusā vācā, samphappalāpo, abhijjhā, vyāpādo, micchādiṭṭhi – ayam vuccati,
bhikkhave, anattho..”
§ In the next and last paragraph of the sutta, attho defined as the opposite of that: panatipatā
veramani, adinnādānā veramani, kāmesumicchacārā veramani, musāvādā veramani, pisuṇā
vācā veramani, parusā vacā veramani, samphappalāpā veramani, abhijjhā veramani, vyāpāda
veramani, sammaādiṭṭhi – ayam vuccati, bhikkhave, attho. ‘ti.
§ This means dasa akusala are “not the real nature”. When one goes against nature, one gets into
trouble; see, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?“.
§ Here are more short suttas that confirm this point: “Anguttara Nikāya – Suttā on Key
Concepts“.
6. Those two short suttas make it crystal clear the following important facts:
7. Now, there are several suttas in the Anguttara Nikāya that put it all together. The first verse in the
Patama Adhamma Sutta (WebLink: AN 10.113 in the Paccorohanivagga) states it nicely:
§ “Adhammo ca, bhikkhave, veditabbo anattho ca; dhammo ca veditabbo attho ca“.
§ I will write another post explaining other verses in that sutta, but we can easily translate that
verse: “Bhikkhus, it is to be comprehended that adhamma leads to |anattā| (helplessness),
and dhamma leads to |attā| (refuge in Nibbāna)”.
§ Furthermore, those who are still clinging to the incorrect interpretation of “anatta” as “no
self“, should be able to clearly see that it leads to the foolish statement: “Bhikkhus, it is to
be comprehended that adhamma leads to no-self, and dhamma leads to self“.
§ The root cause of this misinterpretation is explained in, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and
Anatta by Early European Scholars“.
8. Dhammā is what one bears, i.e., what principles one lives by. But it is normally used in the sense
of “good dhamma“.
§ Adhamma (or adhammā) is the opposite: immoral living. If one engages in dasa akusala, then
one is engaging in adhamma, i.e., one bears adhammā.
§ This can be compared to the following: We use the word “smell” normally to mean “bad
smell”. We specifically say “good smell” to indicate an actual good smell.
§ In the same way, dhammā can be good or bad (“what one bears”). However, we normally use
the word dhammā to indicate good dhammā. Bad dhammā are adhammā.
9. Normally the word dhamma is used to indicate a teaching or a principle, as in Buddha Dhamma.
The word dhammā (with a long “a”) is used to indicate what one bears as a result of past kamma; see,
“What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!“. Dhammā are the same as kamma beeja.
§ We need to be able to figure out meaning depending on the context, how the word is used in a
given verse.
10. When one examines carefully ANY sutta in the Tipiṭaka they will be consistent with the above
explanation.
§ It is clear that those three suttas make the key connection between the deeper Tilakkhaṇa
(“theory”) and the practice (cleansing the mind via sīla, i.e., staying away from dasa akusala).
We don’t need to analyze hundreds of suttas to see the connection.
§ When I go to online discussion boards, I get totally confused. People just quote suttas from
different sites, and normally they have incorrect meanings of key Pāli words. It is a waste of
time to read all those long posts providing “evidence” from different places, and of course there
are usually inconsistencies among them.
§ This was a major reason that I decided to start this website, because I can show that everything
is consistent if one uses the true meanings of key Pāli words.
11. It is also good to keep in mind that a major problem with many texts is that they take
conventional meanings of key words and apply them in the wrong places.
§ Unless one is clear about the true meanings of such key words, and know where to use a given
meaning, it is easy to veer-off in a totally wrong direction; see, “Pāli Dictionaries – Are They
Reliable?“. Also see, “Buddha Dhamma: Non-Perceivability and Self-Consistency“.
12. In the previous post, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?“, we briefly mentioned that anatta is
closely related to dasa akusala. I hope the connection is much more clear now.
§ Engaging in dasa akusala can only lead to suffering and thus helplessness in the long run.
Therefore, engaging in actions, speech, thoughts associated with dasa akusala are not only
pointless but also dangerous.
§ This idea is quite clear in the Sinhala word for |anattā|: “anārtha” that we discussed in that
previous post. It literally means “doing things that are totally useless and can only bring harm”.
13. Those who believe that doing dasa akusala can bring “bad vipāka” only in future lives are
mistaken. Many people do not realize that even having immoral thoughts can bring us stress in this
life itself.
This was discussed in detail in the beginning posts in the “Living Dhamma” section. That section is
important in two aspects:
a. When one starts abstaining from dasa akusala, one can experience a definite sense of relief —
also called nirāmisa sukha — and that should be the initial focus.
b. When one starts experiencing this nirāmisa sukha, one also starts comprehending deeper
aspects of Dhamma like the anicca and anatta nature. Only with those insights that one can
actually start to “see” the long-term kamma vipāka due to dasa akusala — like those leading to
births in the apāyas (lowest four realms).
14. Finally, note that atta is sometimes spelled out as “attha” (with an “h”) in many texts and
each may imply mundane or deeper meaning. For example, the old Sinhala commentaries are called
“atthakathā“. It means “accounts about the truth” (“kathā” means “story”).
§ Those are the reliable commentaries in the Tipiṭaka: Patisambhidamagga, Petakopadesa, and
Nettippakarana. Out of many Sinhala atthakathā, those three are the only ones that survived.
§ On the other hand, commentaries by Buddhaghosa and others are do not belong to atthakathā.
Visuddhimagga is one such popular but erroneous commentary; see, “Buddhaghosa’s
Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“.
15. Finally, we can now see the truth in the verse, “Dhammo ca yathā Dhammo, yathā atto” that is
also in the Patama Adhamma Sutta of #7 above.
§ That means, “when one bears true (yathā) Dhamma, one comprehends the truth (and avoids
being helpless in future)”.
§ If one bears dhammā and stays away from adhammā, that will help one grasp the Tilakkhaṇa.
Then one will not become |anattā| or helpless in this rebirth process. One will have “|attā|” or
refuge.
§ This is an important post which provides a simple but critical link between “theory and
practice”. It is good idea to read those relevant other posts and come back and re-read this post,
until this connection is grasped.
§ This basic idea can go a long way in comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
We can see how the word “anatta” got translated incorrectly as “no-self” by carefully examining the
different usages of the word “|attā|“.
§ There is “atta” which is different from “|attā|” (with a “long a at the end). Anatta is the opposite
of “atta” not of “|attā|“.
§ Anātma (which is a Sanskrit word not used by the Buddha and could be translated as “no-self”),
has been misinterpreted as anatta.
§ We will discuss these in detail below.
1. In the previous post, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?“, we discussed how the term
sakkaya diṭṭhi gets incorrectly translated when the word “atta” in a key verse in the Culavedalla Sutta
is misinterpreted. Atta has two meanings:
§ One meaning is mundane: “I” or “myself” as in the first verse of “|attā| hi attano nātho” (“only
I can be of salvation to myself”), and that is the meaning implied in the above verse.
§ The other deeper meaning of “atta” is “in control” or “has essence”, and the opposite of that
(“na” + “atta“) is the anatta in Tilakkkhana: “one is helpless in this rebirth process”.
§ Those two meanings are explained in “|Attā| Hi Attano Nātho” and in detail in, “Pāli
Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
2. Comprehension of a concept is very different from memorization of the definition of a word. All
one needs to do is to understand what is MEANT by a word; that is saññā; see, “Saññā – What It
Really Means“.
§ Atta/anatta are key Pāli words in relation to the Tilakkhaṇa, so it is essential to get the correct
saññā or the idea. In future posts, we will discuss several other critical usages of atta/anatta.
A. Atta as “a Person” versus “Essence” or “Truth”
3. Many of the misconceptions about “self” and “no-self” can be understood by taking a systematic
look at how the Pāli word “atta” is used in the conventional sense and in the deeper sense (to give
different meanings in different places ).
§ “|attā|” (pronounced with a “long a at the end”) is used to denote a person: There is no
word for negation of that |attā|.
§ In Sinhala, it is written as “අත්තා”. That is how it appears in the Pāli Tipiṭaka that is written
in Sinhala.
§ Even though |attā| has this meaning as a “person”, anatta is never used as the opposite of that |
attā|.
§ Pronunciation:
WebLink: Pronunciation - attā
4. The word “atta” (pronounced with a “short a at the end”) is “the essence” or “the truth that
is timeless”. The negation is “anatta“.
§ In Sinhala they are written as “අත්ථ” and “අනත්ථ”. That is how they appear in the Pāli
Tipiṭaka that is written in Sinhala.
§ Pronunciation of the two words:
WebLink: Pronunciation - atta and anatta
§ There is a third meaning too (especially when it is written as “attha“, with an emphasis at the
end), which is closely related to the second meaning above:
§ The Sinhala word for attha is “artha” which means “truth” or “that which makes sense”. The
opposite word in Sinhala is “anartha“, which emphasizes that what is “anartha” is not worth
doing.
§ In Sinhala they are written as “අර්ථ” and “අනර්ථ”.
§ Pronunciation of the two words:
WebLink: Pronunciation - artha and anartha
8. In relation to anatta in Tilakkhaṇa, “atta” can also be described as “utlimate truth” (“sathya” in
Sinhala and Sanskrit). That truth is anicca nature: “this world cannot bring happiness anywhere in
the 31 realms”.
§ Therefore, this whole world is of anatta nature, having no “essence” and thus lacking anything
is worthwhile pursuing. Therefore, if one tries to do that impossible task, one will only get
exhausted, i.e., subjected to suffering.
§ Anyone who is struggling to achieve this impossible task is truly helpless.
§ All the above statements convey the meaning of the word, “anatta“; that is the saññā that one
needs to absorb.
9. When one pursues “pleasurable things in this world” assuming that the nature is nicca (i.e., can
lead to happiness), one will be subject to suffering or dukha and thus one is anatta (becomes
helpless). This is explained in the key post, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ When one pursues worldly things assuming that the world is of “nicca” and “atta” nature, one
tends to do dasa akusala.
§ When one realizes that the nature is anicca and anatta, one will try to stay away from dasa
akusala even when pursuing worldly things. It is fairly easy to see potential problems with the
three types of akusala done with the body and the four types done with speech. This is the first
stage in the path (mundane path).
§ When one follows the mundane path (i.e., live a moral life), one starts to cleanse one’s mind
and discard many micchā diṭṭhi, i.e., start cleansing the mind.
§At that stage, when one is exposed to the true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta, one is able
to comprehend them and start on the lokuttara (Noble) Path.
§ One seriously starts tackling the akusala done by the mind when one becomes a Sotāpanna and
starts on the Noble Path. All dasa akusala are removed only at the Arahant stage. That is the
“atta” or the “nātha” state; one is no longer anatta.
10. One will be subjected to much suffering (dukha) until one realizes that it is fruitless to pursue
“valuable things” by engaging in dasa akusala.
§ The Noble truth of dukkha sacca (or dukkha sathya) is to see that relief from suffering comes
only by rejecting dasa akusala and by engaging in “good and moral activities”, i.e., dasa
kusala.
§ When one reaches Nibbāna, that is the state of nicca, sukha, atta, the opposites of anicca,
dukkha, anatta that are characteristics of this world of 31 realms.
B. Discussion of the Anatta Lakkhana Sutta
11. There are several Pāli (and Sinhala) words (mama, asmi, and me) that are used to indicate “me”,
“I”, “myself”. |Attā| is also used to indicate “self” in the conventional sense, and “having no essence”
in the deeper sense. It is important to note the difference in all those usages.
§ All these terms are in the Anatta Lakkhana Sutta, which is the key sutta that discussed the
concepts of atta and the opposite, anatta in the deeper sense. Here are the key verses that are
relevant to our discussion here:
“Tam kim mannata, bhikkhave: rupam niccam va aniccam va ti? “Bhikkhus: is any rūpa (material
entity) nicca or anicca?” or “Bhikkhus: can any rūpa be kept to one’s satisfaction or it cannot be
kept to one’s satisfaction?”
– Aniccam , Bhante “It cannot be kept to one’s satisfaction, Venerable Sir”.
Yam pan aniccam dukham va sukham va ti? “Will such an entity lead to suffering or happiness?”
Yaṃ pan aniccam dukham viparinama dhamman, kallam nu tam samanupassitum: ‘etan mama, eso
hamasmi, eso me atta ‘ti? “Will such an entity that cannot be kept to one’s satisfaction, that leads to
suffering, and is a viparinama dhamma, should be considered as “myself or mine, or can taken as
my atta?”
– N’ hetum, Bhante.” “No reason to think so, Venerable Sir”.
12. Now, that last verse also clearly states what words were used by the Buddha to mean “me”, “I”,
“myself”.
§ This key verse with these words is, “Etam mama, eso’ham asmi, eso me attāti“, which means,
“That is mine, it is me, or my attā (my essence)“.
§ It is interesting to note that even today, the Sinhala word for “me” or “myself” is “mama“, and
“asmi” is the sense of “me” or “mine” as in asmi māna, which is one of the last samyojana
removed at the Arahant stage; see, “Pāli Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
13. The first type of “wrong saññā” or the idea that “I am my physical body” (and “I am my vedanā“,
etc) are removed at the Sotāpanna stage by removing Sakkāya Diṭṭhi. The much deeper-embedded
saññā of “a me” is removed only at the Arahant stage; see, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me)
View?“.
§ Anatta — on the other hand — is the correct saññā that, (i) this world of 31 realms cannot offer
any “essence” or “true happiness” and, (ii) therefore, one who is struggling to find such
“ultimate truth in this world” is helpless.
§ This is why a qualified person explaining Dhamma must have the patisambhidā ñāṇa to at least
some extent, in order to figure out the correct meaning of key words in the suttas. We discussed
another important example in last week’s post: “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?“.
§ One cannot just consult a Pāli dictionary and use the meaning given there; see, “Sutta –
Introduction” and “Pāli Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
§ Of course, that seems to be origin of the incorrect translation of anatta as “no-self”, i.e.,
choosing the wrong (conventional) meaning of “|attā|“ (with a long “a” at the end).
C. What About Athma/Anathma?
14. The final piece of this puzzle are the words ātma/anātma. These are Sanskrit words and NOT Pāli
words. Pronunciation:
WebLink: Pronunciation - athma and anathma
§ The confusion came when people started translating atta/anatta as ātma/anātma in both
Sanskrit and Sinhala (many Sanskrit words have been adopted as Sinhala words, which is
unfortunate because that makes things more confusing).
§ In Sinhala they are written as “ආත්ම” and “අනාත්ම”.
§ In Sanskrit ātma basically means “soul”, an indestructible entity that survives death and
eventually merges with the “Mahā Brahma” equivalent of the “Creator God” in Abrahamic
religions. This is different from both Pāli words of atta and |attā| that we discussed above.
§ Atta/anatta are deep concepts with several underlying concepts. One meaning of anatta is that
there is no unchanging soul/ātma. Therefore, anatta INCLUDES the concepts of anātma (the
opposite of ātma); see, “Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“.
The connection between dasa akusala and anatta is discussed at, “Dasa Akusala and Anatta – The
Critical Link“. That will complete this discussion, and will help cultivating the “anatta saññā“.
3.3.3.5 Anattā (Mundane Interpretation) – No “Unchanging Self”
December 5, 2018
1. These days, most people just translate the key Pāli word “anatta” simply as “no-self”. However,
just by looking at a few occurrences of “anatta” in the Tipiṭaka, we can clearly see that it needs to be
interpreted in different ways, depending on the context.
§ In fact, the words “attha“, “atta“, and “attā” can have many different meanings depending on
the context.
§ Even in English there are cases like this: The word “right” means two different things in “you
are right” and “turn right”. Even though it is pronounced the same way, “write” means
something entirely different from both those meanings of “right”.
2. Even though this a bit deep sutta, WebLink: suttacentral: Ānanda Sutta (SN 44.10), provides a
good basis to start a discussion on anatta. Just as now, many people in the days of the Buddha
wondered whether a “self” or a “soul” (attā) exists. This is of course the mundane meaning of attā.
§ Vacchagotta comes to the Buddha asked “kiṃ nu kho, bho gotama, atthattā”ti?” OR “Master
Gotama, is it correct to say that there is a “self”?”.
§ Note that “atthattā” is “attha attā” where “attha” means “truth” and (as Vaccagotta meant
in this case)“attā” to be “self”. Thus, by saying “atthattā” Vacchagotta meant: “correct to say
an attā exists”.
3. The Buddha remained silent and Vacchagotta asked the question again in the negative form. The
second time, he asked: “Kiṃ pana, bho gotama, natthattā”ti?” or, “”Master Gotama, is it not correct
to say that there is a “self”?”. Seeing that the Buddha is refusing to answer his question, Vacchagotta
got up and left.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 167
§ Note that “natthattā” is made up of three words: “na attha attā” which negates “atthattā“.
§ I have discussed some of these word combinations in Pāli: “Kāmaccandha and Icca – Being
Blinded by Cravings“.
4. When Vacchagotta left, Ven. Ānanda asked why the Buddha did not answer the question.
§ The Buddha explained that if he answered in positive (i.e., there is a “self”), then he would be
agreeing with those who had the wrong view that such a “self” exists. This view is called
sassatavāda or the view that there is an “everlasting entity” (these days also called “a soul”).
[sassatavāda :[m.] eternalism.]
§ If answered in negative (i.e., there is “no-self”), then he would be agreeing with those who had
the wrong view that such a “self” does not exist. This is called ucchedavāda or the view that the
death of the body is the “end of a person”, i.e., no re-birth. [ucchedavādī :[m.] one who
professes the doctrine of annihilation.]
§ The Buddha rejected both views of “self” (sassatavāda) and “no-self”(ucchedavāda).
5. Just from that verse it is clear that if one takes “anatta” as “no-self”, then one has the wrong
view taken by one faction of brahmins in the days of the Buddha: that of ucchedavāda.
§ I was surprised to that the Sutta Central English translation says exactly what I explained in the
#4 above; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Ānanda Is There a Self? (SN 44.10)“. Directly quoting
from that translation:
§“If, Ānanda, when I was asked by the wanderer Vacchagotta, ‘Is there a self?’ I had answered,
‘There is a self,’ this would have been siding with those ascetics and brahmins who are
eternalists. And if, when I was asked by him, ‘Is there no self?’ I had answered, ‘There is no
self,’ this would have been siding with those ascetics and brahmins who are annihilationists.”
§ So, the translation of this verse is the same as mine. But the Sutta Central translation of the next
verse uses the same meaning of “no-self” in ‘sabbe dhammā anattā’ and gets into a
contradiction, as we discuss now.
6. Then the Buddha told Ven. Ānanda that any discussion on this topic would confuse Vacchagotta
because he would then get mixed up with the deeper meaning of “anatta” in ‘sabbe dhammā anattā’,
the “anatta nature”: “Ahañcānanda, vacchagottassa paribbājakassa ‘atthattā’ti puṭṭho samāno
‘atthattā’ti byākareyyaṃ, api nu me taṃ, ānanda, anulomaṃ abhavissa ñāṇassa uppādāya: ‘sabbe
dhammā anattā’”ti?”. “No hetaṃ, bhante”. [See What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis and What
are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!]
§ In fact, this the the confusion most people have today. They equate “anatta nature” in “sabbe
dhammā anattā” with the “no-self” meaning of “anattā”.
§ “Sabbe dhammā anattā” needs to be translated as “ all dhammā are of anatta nature“, i.e., of
“without essence”, and that one would become “anattā” or “without refuge” if one does not
comprehend the “anatta nature”.
7. In the Sutta Central translation, the same mundane meaning (“no self”) is used for anatta in
“sabbe dhammā anattā”.
§ The verse in #6 is translated in the Sutta Central translation as: “If, Ānanda, when I was asked
by the wanderer Vacchagotta, ‘Is there a self?’ I had answered, ‘There is a self,’ would this
have been consistent on my part with the arising of the knowledge that ‘all phenomena are
nonself’?”.
§ First of all, the statement “all phenomena are non-self”, does not make any sense.
Dhammā cannot have a “self” anyway. Here, the correct translation is something like, “all
phenomena are of no real essence”. We will discuss this in detail later.
8. That is the danger in translating suttas word-by-word, without grasping the real meanings of Pāli
words and without understanding that meanings depend on exactly in what context the word is used.
§ Therefore, it should be quite clear that Vacchagotta’s confusion is not different from the
confusion that many people have today.
§ However, Vacchagotta was able to grasp that distinction later on and became a bhikkhu. Ven.
Vacchagotta became an Arahant.
§ I sincerely hope those who have the wrong understanding today will also be able to see the
truth at some point.
9. The deeper meaning of “anatta” will become clear as we discuss this in detail in the future, after
more basic material is discussed. Without understanding those more basic concepts, it is dangerous to
just translate a given key Pāli word like anatta using a generic English word(s).
§ For now, we will postpone the discussion on the deeper meaning of “anatta” and just focus on
“attā” and “anattā” in the sense of “self” and “no-self”.
10. A given living being can be born in any of the 31 realms (actually a few realms are reserved for
Anāgāmis); see, “31 Realms of Existence” and “31 Realms Associated with the Earth“.
§ But the point is that a human in this life could be born a deva or a brahma or an animal or
a preta in the next life. Would a dog have the same “self” as a human?
§ So, it is quite clear that there in no “unchanging self“.
11. On the other hand, a human does not just become a deva or a brahma or an animal or a preta in
the next life without underlying causes. It is not a random process.
§ There is a continuation of the “lifestream” from this life to the next. The connection is made
with one’s gati and one’s kamma vipāka accumulated in this and previous lives. This important
and forgotten key word gati (or gathi) has been discussed in many posts.
§ This is why it is not correct to say that there is “no-self”. There are “personality
attributes” that flow from this life to the next.
12. Therefore, from #10 and #11 we can see why the Buddha rejected both views of “an unchanging
self” and “no-self”.
§ Rather, there is a next life (birth) according to the principle of Paṭicca Samuppāda, which is
based on cause and effect , just like in modern science. We will discuss PS later. However, it is
easy to see this with just an understanding of kamma and kamma vipāka.
§ Basically, dasa akusala (and pāpa kamma or immoral deeds) lead to bad births and dasa kusala
(and puñña kamma or moral deeds) lead to good births.
§ This was discussed in: “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa Kamma“.
What really matters in the end is one comprehends, not words. The way different people interpret
“no-self” could be different, even though the concept of a “self” is very clear.
§ If anatta means “no-self”, then there is nothing that can distinguish person A from person B.
So, if A takes something belongs to B, he can say, “there is no “me” and there is no “you”;
what is wrong in me using “your” stuff?”. If B believes in “no-self” can he argue with A?
§ Similarly, there are many other contradictions: If there is “no-self”, (i) who attains Nibbāna?,
(ii) who does moral or immoral acts?, etc.
§ Instead one needs to comprehend that “one is really helpless in this rebirth process” or “one is
not in control over the long run”; that is the concept of anatta, as we discuss below.
1. Let us look at the two words the Buddha used: “āthma” and “anāthma”. In the Brahmajala sutta,
the Buddha definitely said both those are not correct. The best translation of those two terms to
present day, I believe, are “soul” and “no-soul”:
§ “Soul” in the sense of an unchanging entity; for example, most religions believe one’s soul goes
to hell or heaven and then that “soul” is forever in that state.
§ “No-soul” in the sense interpreted by a materialist, i.e., “a person” is just the body (with
thoughts arising from the material brain), and when one dies that is end of story; nothing
survives physical death.
§ Those were the two extremes rejected by the Buddha as “athma” and “anathma”.
2. The real confusion arose when the Pāli word “anatta” was translated to Sanskrit as “anathma”.
Subsequently, the Sanskrit word “anathma” was translated to English as “no-self”. This was done at
the same time when “athma” was translated as “soul”.
3. The real question is when one says, “there is “no-self””, does one imply that there is no “soul”, i.e.,
no “athma”? There are two possibilities. Let us look at them carefully:
§ If one means by “no-self” that when one dies that is the end of story, i.e., there is no rebirth
process, then this is same as “no-soul”.
§ Or, it is possible that some people may have the idea of a “changing personality” rather than the
above materialistic view of nothing surviving the death, i.e., one believes that a human can be
reborn an animal. Then one has the right concept of “no-self” or what I call a “ever-changing
personality”.
§ One needs to contemplate on this and clearly distinguish between the two possible
interpretations.
4. But I have seen many people just use the phrase “no-self” in the wrong way.
§ Some say, ‘The Buddha told us that there is “no-self”. So, what is the point of going through
learning Dhamma etc., because there is no “me”.
§ Others say, “Even if I die and get reborn as an animal, it will be not “me”, because there is “no-
self”.
§ They are both wrong by talking about a “no-soul”. What I ask them is, “If there is no “me”,
would it be OK if someone hits you hard with a stick or worse?”. Then of course they realize
that there is a “me”. That is the “me” who learns Dhamma or who could be reborn an
animal.
5. We can take a simple simile to get an idea of these two extremes of “soul” and “no-soul”. We have
all seen shapes and colors created by water fountains.
§ We all know those structures created by water are not real. But we cannot say they do not exist.
§ In the same way, since we cannot say that a person does not exist. However, there is nothing
that exists permanently, it is just transitory. Thus both “self” and “no-self” are wrong
perceptions.
§ Just like we can create different shapes and figures using that water fountain, we all go through
various lifeforms in the rebirth process.
§ But that cannot be grasped just by reading about it. One needs to contemplate (meditate) using
real examples from one’s life. One will know that one is starting to get the concept when one
starts realizing that one’s cravings for things in this world is gradually waning.
Why Dukkha is not Merely Suffering?
1. There is confusion about what the Buddha said about suffering because most cannot distinguish
between dukha and dukkha. But the Pāli word for suffering is dukha. Dukkha (dukha+khya) means
there is hidden suffering AND that suffering can be eliminated (khya is removal); see, “What is San?
– Meaning of Saṃsāra (or Samsāra)“.
§ And dukkha sacca (the first Noble Truth) is the knowledge on seeing that those things we value
as “sense pleasures” are in fact the CAUSE of this “hidden suffering”.
2. Dukha is a vedanā (feeling). Anyone, and even animals feel dukha. No one has to convince anyone
there is dukha in this world. If anyone can attain Nibbāna by realizing dukha in this world, then
animals would attain Nibbāna first, because they know dukha very well.
§ However, dukkha (or the dukkha sacca) is the First Noble Truth. It says there is “hidden
suffering” behind all this apparent happiness or the illusion of a future happiness that can be
achieved by “working hard”.
§ Dukkha Sacca is comprehended not by contemplating on suffering, but contemplating on the
causes for suffering, i.e., the immoral things we tend to do because of the lack of understanding
of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ In order to comprehend dukkha, one needs to understand the wider world view of the Buddha
and see that most suffering will be in future rebirths unless one attains at least the Sotāpanna
stage of Nibbāna.
§ That is why it takes a lot of time and effort to gain wisdom (paññā) and truly start on the Path.
Since our senses cannot sense other realms, including the suffering-filled lowest 4 realms
(except the animal realm), it is not a trivial matter to understand and truly believe the message
of the Buddha.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 171
3. This wrong conception has also led to the popularity of “breath meditation” (the incorrect ānāpāna
meditation) as a way to remove “suffering”.
§ It is true that one could get “temporary relief” and even jhānic experiences using the breath
meditation. But that does not solve the problem of “long-term sansāric suffering” emphasized
by the Buddha.
§ When one cultivates the true “ānāpāna meditation” (see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“), one can
achieve temporary relief AND work towards “long-term happiness” of Nibbāna.
4. Most people have the perception that Buddha Dhamma is pessimistic, because it emphasizes
suffering. Actually, it is quite the opposite.
§ The Buddha was just the messenger of the bad news. He DISCOVERED the true nature of this
world: No matter where we are reborn within the 31 realms, we will not find happiness and in
the LONG RUN, suffering prevails; see, “The Four Stages in Attaining Nibbāna“.
§ A world which is based on constant change, or more correctly constant disorder,
(impermanence) is inherently incapable of providing stability (thus anicca is not
impermanence, but anicca arises out of impermanence); see, “Second Law of Thermodynamics
is Part of Anicca!“.
§ Yet, we have the PERCEPTION that we can somehow “beat the system” and find happiness.
That is the wrong perception of nicca. Once we truly realize dukkha, we will see that anything
in this world has the anicca nature; nothing in this world can provide long-lasting happiness in
the long term.
5. The Buddha not only discovered that “this world” cannot provide us with stable and lasting
happiness. He also found the way to get out of this inherently unstable, and thus unsatisfactory nature
of existence. This is the Noble Eightfold Path.
6. Thus it is important to realize that dukkha has embedded in it the only optimistic message
anyone can deliver: That we can overcome this inevitable suffering.
§ When one truly realizes the true nature of “this world”, one voluntarily gives up
struggling in vain to achieve the impossible, and that automatically leads to a state of
happiness in one’s mind even before the Sotāpanna stage.
§ This particular happiness, nirāmisa sukha, is different from the sense pleasures and one
can experience it more and more as one follows the Path, and culminates in Arahantship
or unconditioned happiness; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa
Sukha?“. One can experience this nirāmisa sukha all the way up to its peak at Nibbāna
during this very life.
7. Another important thing to realize is that there are only two ways that anyone’s destiny works out:
§ One waits until one gets really old to EXPERIENCE the suffering even in this life itself. It does
not matter how much money one has: One will NOT be able to enjoy the sensual pleasures as
one used to in the younger ages: all sense faculties degrade including culinary pleasures, visual,
auditory, sex, etc. And if one gets a major illness it will be worse. The absolutely worse thing is
that by that time it will be too late, because even the mind starts to degrade (it is actually the
brain that degrades), and one will not be able to make any spiritual progress.
§ The other and the ONLY reasonable option is to develop insight NOW. The Buddha had
revealed the true nature of ‘this world” of 31 realms. At least one should examine the big
picture laid out by the Buddha to see whether that picture makes sense, and if it does to work
towards getting out of “this world”.
§ People commit suicide thinking that it will end the suffering. It does not. The only way to stop
suffering is to stop rebirth. There is nowhere to be found in the 31 realms that will end the
suffering. One may find relatively long periods of happiness in the higher realms, but in the
sansāric time scale that will only be a blip; see, “Sansāric Time Scale” and “Infinity – How Big
Is It?“.
§ And one can test the path prescribed by the Buddha. As one experiences the nirāmisa sukha by
removing greed, hate, and ignorance, one can start feeling the “cooling down”, the early stages
of Nibbāna; see, “How to Taste Nibbāna“. This will accentuate one’s liking of Dhamma
(chanda), enhance one’s determination (citta) and effort (viriya) to seek insight (vimansa); see,
“The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“.
Next, “Anicca – Repeated Arising/Destruction“, ………..
3.3.5 Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – According to Some Key Suttas
:
Revised January 20, 2016; December 3, 2017; January 26, 2018
The key to understanding the First Noble Truth (Dukkha Sacca; pronounced “dukkha sachcha”) is to
understand the Three Characteristics of “this wider world of 31 realms”, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta.
Let us discuss how these concepts are presented in some key suttas.
Dhamma Cakka Pavattana Sutta
1.How suffering arises from Anicca is explicitly described in the very first sutta, WebLink:
suttacentral: Dhamma Cakka Pavattāna Sutta (SN 56.11). Here is the text from the sutta:
Idam kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkham ariyasaccam:
jātipi dukkhā, jarāpi dukkhā, byādhipi dukkho, maraṇampi dukkhāṃ, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho,
piyehi vippayogo dukkho, yampicchaṃ na labhati tampi dukkhāṃ—saṃkhittena
pañcupādānakkhandhā dukkhā.
2. Bhikkhus, What is the Noble Truth of Suffering?
§ “jāti api dukkha” means “birth of something that is not liked by one causes suffering”. “Jara pi
dukkha” means, “decay of something that is liked causes suffering”, and “maranan pi dukkha”
means, “Death of a liked causes suffering”.
§ Then comes, “..appiyehi sampayogo dukkho, piyehi vippayogo dukkho” meaning, “it brings
sorrow when a loved one has to depart, and it also brings sorrow to be with a hated person”.
3. And then the summary of all that: “yamp’iccham (yam pi iccham) na labhati tam’pi dukkham”.
Here we see, “ichcha” that we encountered in both anicca, dukka, anatta and also in paṭicca
samuppāda (“pati+ichcha” “sama+uppada”). And “labhati” means “get”.
§ Thus, “Ifone does not get what one likes, that leads to suffering”. This phrase has
everything condensed. This is anicca. It does not say suffering arises because of
impermanence.
§ This is explained in more detail in “Does the First Noble Truth Describe only Suffering?“.
§ It should be noted that icca and iccha (ඉච්ච and ඉච්ඡ in Sinhala) are used interchangeably in
the Tipiṭaka under different suttas, as you can see below. The word “iccha” with the emphasis
on the last syllable is used to indicate “strong icca” or “strong attachment”.
Anatta Lakkhana Sutta
1. In the second sutta, the WebLink: suttacentral: Anatta Lakkhana Sutta (SN 22.59) (which was also
delivered to the five ascetics within a fortnight of the first sutta), the questions that the Buddha was
asking the ascetics and their responses are given:
“Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti?
§ “Aniccaṃ, bhante”.
2. The first question was, “Bhikkhus: is any rūpa nicca or anicca?” or “Bhikkhus: can any rūpa
(material entity) be kept to one’s satisfaction or it cannot be kept to one’s satisfaction?”
And the bhikkhus answer: “It cannot be kept to one’s satisfaction, Venerable Sir”.
§ Here it is to be noted that “rūpa” can be either internal or external. There are many rūpa in this
world that are “permanent” at least compared to our lifetimes. For example, an item made of
gold or a diamond can last millions of years. But neither can be kept to “our satisfaction” since
we will have to give them up when we die.
3. The second question is: “Will such an entity lead to suffering or happiness?” And the bhikkhus
answer: “Suffering, Venerable Sir”.
§ Here it is important to see that if an entity is not permanent, whether that will lead to suffering:
How many people suffered when Bin Laden got killed? Only those who liked him to live!
Many people rejoiced in his demise; this is also discussed in detail in “Does the First Noble
Truth Describe only Suffering?“.
4. The third question is: “Will such an entity that cannot be kept to one’s satisfaction, that leads to
suffering, and is a viparinama dhamma, should be considered as “myself or mine, or has any
substance?” And the bhikkhus answer: “No reason to think so, Venerable Sir”.
5. Here we need to pay attention to the sequence of the three questions. The Buddha was pointing out
that no “rūpa” can be kept to our satisfaction, therefore that (i.e., forming attachment to such rūpa)
will lead to suffering, and therefore there is no reason to consider of them having any substance.
Anicca leads to |dukkhā| and to |anattā|, because we have nicca saññā about such (anicca) rūpa.
§ This was pointed out as “Yadaniccaṃ taṃ dukkhaṃ; yaṃ dukkhaṃ tadanattā.” in the
Ajjhattanicca Sutta in the Saṃyutta Nikāya as was pointed out in “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta –
Wrong Interpretations“.
6. The Buddha was talking about “rūpa” in general, which could be external objects or one’s own
body (which are included in the pañcakkhandha or the twelve ayatanas, i.e., anything in the “whole
world”).
§ The second question is, “any such entity, whether in one’s own body or in the outside world
will eventually lead to suffering or happiness?”, and the bhikkhus answer “Suffering”.
§ Then the third question is “If my body is such an entity, is it suitable to call it mine? if an
external object is such entity, is it suitable to be called mine? and is there any substance in any
of those?”
§ Thus “|attā|” at the end meant “substantial or fruitful or worthy“. Thus what is meant is
EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD is without substance, i.e., |anattā|, which is the opposite of |
attā|. This is why it is “sabbe dhamma anattā“, even the nama gotta that do not decay do not
have any substance; see, “Difference Between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (Sankata)“
7. Thus it is important to realize that the Buddha was not referring to just one’s body; anicca applies
to all saṅkhāra and saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). Nothing in this world can be kept to our
satisfaction: “Sabbe saṅkhāra anicca“.
§ This becomes clear when we think about it in depth. There are many external objects in this
world that do not decay within our lifetimes: gold or diamonds are two good examples.
§ We may not be able to keep a gold necklace to “our liking”, for example if have to sell it to
raise money if we go bankrupt. But the point is that even if we do not lose it due to such an
event, we WILL lose it when we die. Either the desired object or our body WILL BE lost, i.e.,
we do not have the ability to maintain ANYTHING to our satisfaction.
§ Thus nicca/anicca is not “permanent/impermanent”, rather “can be /cannot be kept our
satisfaction”. If suffering arises because of impermanence, then suffering cannot be stopped
from arising, because impermanence is a fact of nature and CANNOT be altered.
§ The “anicca” character does not reside in the object or the rūpa. It is in our mind. We CAN
remove the wrong perception of nicca from our minds and CAN stop suffering from arising in
future rebirths.
§ Then the same set of questions are repeated for vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa.
None of those can be maintained to our satisfaction, i.e., they all are anicca. Thus we
eventually suffer, and thus all struggles to keep them to our satisfaction are in vain and
therefore, we are helpless in this rebirth process. This is anicca, dukkha, anatta.
8. We strive to accumulate “good stuff” but will have to leave them all behind at death. When we go
through the rebirth process, we just repeat this process in each life.
§ In most rebirths the suffering is great, and in some there is happiness (human, deva and brahma
realms), but such “good rebirths” are encountered very rarely. The Buddha said that the lowest
four realms are the “home base” for the living beings; they may visit other realms once-in-a-
while, but always have to come back and spend most time in the home base.
§ This is why the Buddha said this never-ending process of the cycle of rebirths, where we suffer
so much, is fruitless and one is truly helpless. This is anatta.
§ It does not make sense to say because of anicca and dukkha, we have “no-self” or “no-soul”.
Rather, as long as we have the wrong perception of anicca about anything in “this world”, we
are subject to suffering and thus we are truly helpless, anatta.
Girimananda Sutta
1. WebLink: suttacentral: Girimananda Sutta (AN 10.60) is another key sutta in the Tipiṭaka that
describes anicca in the deepest sense. The Buddha delivered this sutta to Ven. Ānanda (for him to
recite to Ven. Girimananda who was in pain due to an ailment). Here is a key phrase (in the middle of
the sutta):
Katamā cānanda (ca Ānanda), sabbasaṅkhāresu anicca saññā?
Idhānanda (Idha Ānanda) bhikkhu sabbasaṅkhāresu aṭṭīyati harāyati jigucchati.
Ayaṃ vuccatānanda (vuccati Ānanda), sabbasaṅkhāresu anicca saññā.
Translated:
§ “Jee” and “goo” are the Pāli and Sinhala words for “urine” and “feces”. As we already know,
“icca” (Pronounced “ichcha”) means “like”. Thus “jiguccati” (pronounced “jiguchchathi”
means “it is no different than liking urine or feces”. All (abhi)saṅkhāra should be treated as
such things.
3. Another key point here is to note that the Buddha was talking about the “anicca saññā“, where
saññā or perception is one of the main mental factors or cetasika. Anicca is a perception in our
minds as we pointed out in the discussion on the Anatta Lakkhana Sutta above.
§ Impermanence is a physical reality of anything in the universe. Scientists know quite well that
nothing in our universe, including the universe itself, is permanent; but that does not provide
them with the perception of anicca. No scientist can attain Nibbāna via comprehending
impermanence.
4. Thus it is quite clear that anicca has nothing to do with “impermanence”. Once one
understands the true nature of the world, one will realize that any saṅkhāra (thought, speech, and
action that is focused on attaining pleasurable things) is not to be valued, because none can be
maintained to one’s satisfaction and will only lead to suffering at the end.
§ Actually, the fruitlessness of ALL SANKHARA is perceived only at the Arahant stage. We
cannot even beginning to comprehend that yet. This is why an Arahant is said to see the burden
associated with even breathing (which is a kaya saṅkhāra). Anything we do to live in this world
is a saṅkhāra.
§ Initially, we should try to comprehend the unsuitability of apuññabhi abhisaṅkhāra, those
associated with immoral actions. Since we can grasp the consequences of such immoral
actions, we CAN get our minds to reject them. This is enough to get to the Sotāpanna
stage.
§ Once we do that, our cleansed minds can begin to see the fruitlessness of puññabhi
abhisaṅkhāra, and then even the pleasures of jhānic states (anenjhabhi abhisaṅkhāra).
Icca Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya)
It should be “WebLink: Suttacentral: Icca Sutta” (pronounced “ichchā sutta) according to the
convention we have used. This sutta clearly describes what “icca” (and thus what anicca) is:
“Kenassu bajjhatī loko, kissa vinayāya muccati;
Kissassu vippahānena, sabbaṃ chindati bandhanan”ti.
“Icchāya bajjhatī loko, icchāvinayāya muccati;
Icchāya vippahānena, sabbaṃ chindati bandhanan”ti.
Translated:
“What binds the world together? How does one get released? How can one gain release?
The world is bound by iccha, one becomes free by losing iccha, one becomes free of all bonds by
losing iccha“
The word “icca” means “liking” and is closely related to “nicca“. Of course “nicca” means the
perception that one can maintain those things to one’s satisfaction (and “anicca” means the opposite).
The perception of nicca leads to icca, i.e., one believes that worldly things can provide everlasting
happiness and thus one likes to hold on to them. Just like an octopus grabs things with all its eight
legs and will not let go, humans (and other beings too) grab onto to worldly things with the hope of
enjoying them.
§ It should be noted that in this sutta, the word “iccha” is used instead of “icca” to emphasize
that “strong attachment” as in the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana Sutta discussed above.
There are many, many suttas in the Tipiṭaka that describe anicca, dukkha, anatta. But if one starts off
with the wrong interpretations, some of those suttas can be interpreted the wrong way, because the
suttas themselves are not designed to describe the concepts in detail. Rather the suttas provide brief
descriptions or the niddesa version, and commentaries (Sinhala atthakatha) were supposed to provide
the detailed (paṭiniddesa) descriptions; see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ The root cause for the confusion has been the acceptance of the Visuddhimagga by
Buddhaghosa as THE key commentary by the Theravāda tradition.
§ Nowadays, most bhikkhus do not read the Tipiṭaka or the remaining three original
commentaries that are in the Tipiṭaka; they just follow what is in the Visuddhimagga. This has
been the single-most obstacle for people attaining Nibbāna for the past many hundreds of years.
§ Luckily, we have three of the original commentaries (Sinhala atthakatha) preserved in the
Tipiṭaka; see, “Misinterpretations of Buddha Dhamma” and “Preservation of the Dhamma“.
However, there is a sutta which clearly states that the Buddha rejected both “self” and “no-
self”, even according to conventional translations.
The “WebLink: suttacentral: Channa Sutta (SN 22.90)” clearly says anatta does not mean “no-self”,
even in a “traditional” English translation: “WebLink: accesstoinsight: Channa Sutta: To Channa (SN
22.90)“: “Everything exists”: That is one extreme. “Everything doesn’t exist”: That is a second
extreme. Avoiding these two extremes, the Tathagata teaches the Dhamma via the middle: From
ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes
consciousness. From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-&-form. From name-&-form
as a requisite condition come the six sense media. From the six sense media as a requisite condition
comes contact. From contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. From feeling as a requisite
condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging/sustenance. From
clinging/sustenance as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a requisite condition
comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain,
distress, & despair come into play. Such is the origination of this entire mass of stress & suffering.”
§ “Everything doesn’t exist” in the above translates to “no-self” when applied to a “living being”.
As far as a “person” is concerned, “self” is one extreme and “no-self” is the other extreme: it
wrong to say either “a person exists” or “a person does not exist”.
§ So, even though most Theravada websites (including the above sites) translate “anatta” as “no-
self”, it is clear from their own translation above that the Buddha rejected this “no-self” view.
Next, “If Everything is Anicca Should We Just give up Everything?“, ………..
3.3.6 Three Marks of Existence – English Discourses
February 3, 2018
Three Marks of Existence or Three Characteristics of Nature (anicca, dukkha, anatta) are discussed
in detail in a series of four discourses. These are based on the first two suttas (Dhammacakka
Pavattana Sutta and the Anatta Lakkhana Sutta) that the Buddha delivered to the five ascetics right
after attaining Enlightenment.
§ Only an essential outline is provided in these discourses. There will be five topics (for each
discourse) in the the “discussion forum” under the forum Three Marks of Existence
Discourses, where one can ask any questions/ express opinions.
§ No question is too simple or too hard. We can find more details in other suttas or in
Abhidhamma.
§ However, these discourses are not recommended for those who are not familiar with basic
concepts in Buddha Dhamma. They might get discouraged. They may want to first get familiar
with the basic concepts in “Moral Living and Fundamentals“, “Working Towards Good
Rebirths“, and “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” sections.
February 3, 2018
Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
Udayavaya Nana
San
Bhūta and Yathābhūta – What Do They Really Mean
1. When one gets rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi (together with vicikicca and silabbata parāmāsa), one
becomes a Sotāpanna and will never be reborn in the four lowest realms (apāyas).
§ It is a change in one’s world view (dassanena pahātabbā) that leads to this enormous change.
§ It cannot be attained by just doing moral deeds (in fact, silabbata parāmāsa is the wrong belief
that living a moral life by itself can liberate oneself).
§ Getting rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi requires a deep understanding of how the nature works. Those
basic principles are described by Tilakkhaṇa or the Three Characteristics of Nature: anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ Here we will examine this relationship, which will help getting rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi.
This is exactly the same definition given in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Cūḷavedalla Sutta (Majjima
Nikāya 44)” that we discussed in the post, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?“. This
definition of sakkāya diṭṭhi is in many more suttas, including “WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiyaisidatta
Sutta (SN 41.3)“.
3. The key is to understand what is meant by, “rūpaṃ attato samanupassati, rūpavantaṃ vā attānaṃ,
attani vā rūpaṃ, rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ, vedanaṃ attato samanupassati” and similarly for vedana,
sañña, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa. Thus, when one has sakkāya diṭṭhi,one has four wrong perceptions
each for the five aggregates.
§ This is called the 20-types of sakkāya diṭṭhi (vīsativatthukā sakkāyadiṭṭhi).
§ First four factors are regarding just one’s own body. It turns out that those four wrong
perceptions on one’s body arises in those who have uccheda diṭṭhi, i.e., that one is not reborn
after death.
§ Then the same four factors are for the four “nāma” entities: vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and
viññāṇa. It turns out that those with wrong perceptions about these have the sāssata diṭṭhi, i.e.,
that one ‘s attā (“self” or “soul”) is eternal or forever.
§ In the Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1), the Buddha discusses 60 more wrong views, but those are
variations of the above two. Therefore, getting rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi leads to the removal of all
wrong views about this world.
§ I will first provide the Tipitaka references for these two cases in the next post.
5. When one has the wrong vision of sakkāya diṭṭhi, some parts of pañcakkhandha become
pañcupādānakkhandhā (pañca upādāna khandha). Those are the parts that one likes based on
one’s gati,
Therefore, one needs to comprehend that one gets attached to things based on one’s gati AT THAT
TIME. One’s gati keep changing and can be very different especially in one is reborn. If one is reborn
into a bad environment (conditions), one is likely to develop “bad gati“.
§ Kamma are done with one good/bad gati AT THAT TIME. They can bring vipāka much later,
even in future lives under suitable conditions.
§ This is why we are subjected to both good and bad kamma vipāka.
§ This is also why we cannot speak about an “unchanging attā/soul/ātma“. A living being is a
“lifestream” that just encounter good/bad vipāka based on what had been done in the past based
on one’s gati at that time. Under suitable conditions, both kinds (good/bad kamma) bring
vipāka.
6. What is discussed in #5 is succinctly stated in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Catutthaabhabbaṭṭhāna
Sutta (AN 6.95)“.
Translation: “A Sotāpanna (or one with higher magga phala) accomplished in view (diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo) is unable (abhabbo) to fall back on the idea that pleasure and pain are made by oneself
(sayaṃkataṃ), or that they are made by another (paraṃkataṃ), or that they are made by both
(sayaṃkatañca paraṃkatañca). Nor can they fall back on the idea that pleasure and pain arise by
chance, not made by oneself, by another, or by both (asayaṃkāraṃ adhiccasamuppannaṃ,
aparaṅkāraṃ adhiccasamuppannaṃ, asayaṅkārañca aparaṅkārañca adhiccasamuppannaṃ).
– Why is that? It is because a person accomplished in view has clearly seen that phenomena arise due
to causes and conditions (according to Paṭicca Samuppāda). Those are the six things that a
Sotāpanna (or one with higher magga phala) accomplished in view will not fall back to”.
§ There is no “attā” or a “soul” or an “ātma” doing those things that will lead to pleasure or pain
(sooner or later).
§ Those kamma vipāka (pleasure or pain) materialize due to two things: (i) Causes were created
in the past based on the “gati” of the lifestream AT THAT TIME, and, (ii) Corresponding
vipāka materialize when suitable CONDITIONS become available (at a later time).
§ That process is described by Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ This is why understanding “gati” is so important. One may have had “bad gati” in the past and
those can bring “bad vipāka” now EVEN IF one has “good gati” now.
§ This is why even the Buddha had to bear bad kamma vipāka. Even though he had “no gati left”,
he had to endure the results of past kamma done when he had “bad gati”.
7. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Sakkāyadiṭṭhi Sutta (SN 22.155)“ it is stated how sakkāya diṭṭhi
arises:
“Kismiṃ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṃ upādāya, kiṃ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjatī”ti? “rūpe
kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṃ upādāya, rūpaṃ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati. Vedanāya sati …
saññāya sati … saṅkhāresu sati … viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṃ upādāya, viññāṇaṃ abhinivissa
sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati”.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, because of focusing on what, attaching to what, and clinging to what leads to
the arising of sakkāya diṭṭhi? It arises due to focusing on rūpa (forms: things and people), attaching
to forms, and clinging to forms. It arises similarly due to vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa“.
Buddha explains: “Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti? “What do you
think Bhikkhus, can rūpa be maintained to one’s satisfaction?’.
“Aniccaṃ, bhante”. “They cannot be, bhante“.
“Yaṃ panāniccaṃ … pe … api nu taṃ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti? “Understanding that
if something cannot be maintained to ones’ satisfaction, if it undergoes unpredictable change and is
destroyed, would one get attached to it and generate sakkāya diṭṭhi?
“No hetaṃ, bhante”. “No reason for that, bhante“.
and the same for the other four aggregates: “Vedanā … saññā … saṅkhārā … viññāṇaṃ niccaṃ vā
aniccaṃ vā”ti?
“Aniccaṃ, bhante”. “Yaṃ panāniccaṃ … pe … api nu taṃ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“No hetaṃ, bhante”. “Evaṃ passaṃ … pe … nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.”
8. Thus, one gets attached to the five aggregates and considers them to be one’s own, only if one does
not see the anicca (and dukkha and anatta) nature of those entities. When one sees that such
attachments invariably (without exception) lead to suffering (because none of them can be maintained
to one’s satisfaction), one loses craving for them.
§ This understanding by itself first leads to “loss of craving”to the extent that one would NOT be
able (abhabbo) do those immoral kamma that makes one suitable for rebirth in the apāyas.
When one loses such upādāna, one would also not grasp such thoughts at the cuti-paṭisandhi
moment.
§ This word abhabbo is not correctly translated in many translations. It does not just mean “one
would not do”, but one “is incapable of doing”. The enforcement is AUTOMATIC; one does
not need to think about whether such an action is immoral. When certain types of gati are
removed PERMANENTLY (with magga phala), one’s mind WOULD NOT be CAPABLE of
doing such immoral actions.
§ When one cultivates such “bad gati“, one would upadana (and be born) to bad births; that is
what is meant by “needing suitable conditions to bring kamma vipāka“, In the “WebLink:
suttacentral: Kukkuravatika Sutta (MN 57)” (English translation there: “WebLink: suttacentral:
The Dog-Duty Ascetic (MN 57)“), the Buddha explains how those “dog gati” that Seniya was
cultivating would lead to him to be born a dog.
§ On the reverse, when one gets rid of such “bad gati” permanently, one would NOT be born in
such bad realms. This is what is meant by the verse, “Catūhapāyehi ca vippamutto,
Chaccābhiṭhānāni abhabba kātuṃ” (“(an Ariya) is free from the four apāyas because he/she is
incapable of doing six highly immoral acts”) in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Ratana Sutta (Snp
2.1)“.
9. Now, it is important to figure out what is meant by “attā” in the description of sakkāya diṭṭhi.
The “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭipadā Sutta (SN 22.44)” describes the way to get rid of sakkāya
diṭṭhi: “Katamā ca, bhikkhave, sakkāyanirodhagāminī paṭipadā? Idha, bhikkhave, sutavā
ariyasāvako ariyānaṃ dassāvī ariyadhammassa kovido ariyadhamme suvinīto, sappurisānaṃ dassāvī
sappurisadhammassa kovido sappurisadhamme suvinīto, na rūpaṃ attato samanupassati, na
rūpavantaṃ vā attānaṃ; na attani vā rūpaṃ, na rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ. Na vedanaṃ attato … na
10. Let us compare the above definition to the following verse in the “WebLink: suttacentral:
Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta (SN 22.59)“: “Rūpaṃ, bhikkhave, anattā. Rūpañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā
abhavissa, nayidaṃ rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca rūpe: ‘evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ
me rūpaṃ mā ahosī’ti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ anattā, tasmā rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati,
na ca labbhati rūpe: ‘evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī’ti.
§ Translated: “Bhikkhus, form (physical body) is anattā (or not attā). For if, bhikkhus, if one’s
body is attā, one would have full control over it, and it would be possible to say: ‘Let my body
be like this; let my body not be like this.’ But because the body is anattā, it is subjected to
decay and disease, and it is not possible to have it the way one desires: ‘Let my body be this
way; let my body not be this way”.
§ The recent post, “Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“ explained the reality
that there is no attā or a “soul” or an “ātma” that can be associated with either one’s physical
body or its four mental aggregates.
11. Again, from the “WebLink: suttacentral: Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta (SN 22.59)“: “Taṃ kiṃ maññatha,
bhikkhave, rūpaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti? “Aniccaṃ, bhante”. “Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vā taṃ
sukhaṃ vā”ti? “Dukkhaṃ, bhante”. “Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vipariṇāmadhammaṃ, kallaṃ nu
taṃ samanupassituṃ: ‘etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante..”.
Translated: ““What do you think, bhikkhus, can form be maintained to one’s satisfaction?”—“No,
bhante”—“Something of such nature which is destroyed eventually would lead to suffering or
happiness?”—“Suffering, venerable sir.”—“Is it prudent to regard such a thing thus: ‘This is mine,
this I am, this is my self’?”—“No, bhante”.
AND
“Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, yaṃ kiñci rūpaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā
oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā yaṃ dūre santike vā, sabbaṃ rūpaṃ: ‘netaṃ mama,
nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti evametaṃ yathābhūtaṃ sammappaññāya daṭṭhabbaṃ”.
Translated: “Therefore, bhikkhus, any kind of form whatsoever, whether past, future, or present,
internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior or superior, far or near, all form (these are 11 types of
rūpa in rūpakkhandha) should be seen as it really is with correct wisdom thus: ‘This is not mine, this
I am not, this is not my self.’
§ The same argument would hold for other four mental aggregates as well.
12. Therefore, sakkāya diṭṭhi is permanently removed when one comprehends the real nature of this
world: anicca (inability maintain rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa in the way one likes
to), thus one would be subjected to suffering, including in the apāyas (dukkha); see, “Anicca – True
Meaning“.
§ Therefore, one is truly helpless in this rebirth process (anatta); see, “Anatta – No Refuge in This
World“. This is the same as not having full control (“na” + “attā” or anattā); see, “Anattā in
Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“.
§ Existence (bhava) in this world and corresponding births (jāti) filled with suffering arise because
one tries to go against the true nature and generates saṅkhāra (due to avijjā). This is Paṭicca
Samuppāda.
§ When one comprehends that, one would stop generating saṅkhāra, starting with the worst kind:
apuñña abhisaṅkhāra (leading to immoral deeds). That is how a Sotāpanna starts on the Noble
Path.
3.3.7.2 Sakkāya Diṭṭhi – Getting Rid of Deeper Wrong Views
2. Removal of sakkāya diṭṭhi is the basis of one’s start on the Noble Eightfold Path. It is really about
getting a “new vision” about the true nature of this world of 31 realms.
§ This is achieved by getting rid of the deeper wrong views (nicca, sukha, atta) about the
nature of this world.
§ In this post we will discuss how “20 types of sakkāya diṭṭhi” is reached by getting rid of 5 types
of wrong views on the five aggregates based on uccheda diṭṭhi and 15 types of wrong views on
the five aggregates based on sassata diṭṭhi. [uccheda :[m.] cutting off; perishing; annihilation.
sassata :[adj.] eternal.]
3. In the previous post, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi and Tilakkhaṇa“, we discussed sakkāya and how sakkāya
diṭṭhi is related to one’s cravings (upādāna) for one’s own body and other material things
(rūpakkhandha) and one’s mental constituents that define those cravings (khandha or aggregates of
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa).
§ As we saw in that post, The word “sakkāya” comes from “sath” + “kāya“, which rhymes as
“sakkāya“. “Sath” means “good” and “kāya” means “a collection” or “an aggregate” (it could
also mean “physical body”, which is also a collection of parts). Thus “sakkāya” means those
five aggregates (including one’s own body) are fruitful.
§ These cravings for the five aggregates arise because of the wrong views of uccheda diṭṭhi or
sassata diṭṭhi or views in between those two (with different combinations), as we discuss
below.
Two Main Diṭṭhis (Deeper Wrong Views)
4. There are two main “diṭṭhis” or “wrong views” about the world that are discussed in the
“WebLink: suttacentral: Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1)“. Note that I always provide the Pāli version of a
sutta, because sometimes the commonly available English translations have errors. I normally
provide the Pāli version at Sutta Central. One can get translations to English — and even a few more
languages — there by clicking on the “hamburger icon” (represented by three short parallel lines) at
the top left.
§ One is the uccheda diṭṭhi, which says a “person” exists only until the death of the physical
body; a “person” is nothing more than a collection of physical matter (molecules). When the
“person” dies that is the end of the story (ucceda means “cut off”).
§ The second is sassata diṭṭhi — which is the exact opposite of the first (sassata means “eternal”)
— is the view that a “person” has a “mental body” that survives the death of the physical body:
In Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam), it is called the “soul”, which goes to
either heaven or hell at death and will stay there forever. In Hinduism it is called “ātma“, which
merges with Mahā Brahma at some point and stays there forever.
§ In the Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1), the Buddha discusses 60 more wrong views, but those are
variations of the above two. In fact, we can see that most scientists have the uccheda diṭṭhi
(that one’s physical body with its brain is all that is there), and most religious people (in
Abrahamic religions and in Hinduism) have the sassata diṭṭhi that one’s soul or ātma lives
forever.
5. If uccheda diṭṭhi is the actual reality of the world, then suffering will end with the death of the
physical body. Thus one may seek to “enjoy worldly pleasures” without paying attention to bad
consequences of doing immoral deeds (when the temptation gets high enough).
§ If sassata diṭṭhi is the actual reality of the world, then suffering will never end, because there is
an “unchanging essence” that will survive the death of the body at any time. Even though the
premise there is of a “suffering-less, joyful realm” (merge with the Creator), the Buddha said
that there is no such existence; All existences are subject to suffering, simply because matter
(rūpa) is unstable. Any existence with even a trace of matter is inherently unstable.
Modern science has confirmed this fact; see, “Second Law of Thermodynamics is Part of
Anicca!“.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, there is an entity (gandhabba, mostly “mental” with just a few
suddhaṭṭhaka or smallest units of matter) that survives the death of the physical body. However,
that gandhabba can be stopped from surviving the death of the physical body. That happens
when one attains the Arahant stage of Nibbāna.
§ Buddha Dhamma says a living being (gandhabba) comes into existence due to six root causes,
but all six are removed with the removal of three root causes (lobha, dosa, moha). Until those
root causes are removed there will be an existence, and most of existences in this world have
much more suffering than any short-lived happiness; see, “Six Root Causes – Loka Samudaya
(Arising of Suffering) and Loka Nirodhaya (Nibbāna)” and “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“.
6. Therefore, the concept in Buddha Dhamma is in between those two extremes of uccheda diṭṭhi and
sassata diṭṭhi.
§ There is a mental body with a trace of matter (gandhabba) that survives the death of the
physical body, but that mental body is ever-changing according to Paticca Samuppāda.
§ Therefore, there is no everlasting “self” or an “ātma” or an “attā“. The denial of an everlasting
“attā” is called “anattā” (“na” + “attā“). That is one meaning of anatta; see, “Anattā in
Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“.
§ Since the death of the physical body is not the end of suffering, one will become helpless in the
rebirth process due to unavoidable births in the four lowest realms (apāyās). This is another
meaning of anatta (“na” + “atta“) or “without refuge or becoming helpless); see, “Anatta – No
Refuge in This World“.
§ When one understands this world view of the Buddha, one removes sakkāya diṭṭhi (together
with vicikicca and silabbata parāmāsa), and attains the Sotāpanna stage.
Two Main Types of Character (Carita)
7. An interesting analysis of sakkāya diṭṭhi in terms of one’s character qualities (carita, pronounced
“charitha”) is provided in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Nayasamuṭṭhāna section” of the
Nettippakarana (a Commentary in the Tipitaka). It provides a definition of the Four Noble Truths in
terms of “sakkāya“: “Tattha diṭṭhicaritā rūpaṃ attato upagacchanti. Vedanaṃ … pe … saññaṃ …
saṅkhāre … viññāṇaṃ attato upagacchanti. Taṇhācaritā rūpavantaṃ attānaṃ upagacchanti. Attani
vā rūpaṃ, rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ, vedanāvantaṃ … pe … saññāvantaṃ … saṅkhāravantaṃ …
viññāṇavantaṃ attānaṃ upagacchanti, attani vā viññāṇaṃ, viññāṇasmiṃ vā attānaṃ, ayaṃ vuccati
vīsativatthukā sakkāyadiṭṭhi“.
Translated: “A person whose ignorance is focused on “wrong view” (diṭṭhicaritā) perceives “I am
my body”, “I am my vedanā“, “I am my saññā“, “I am my saṅkhāra“, and “I am my viññāṇa“.
A person whose ignorance is focused on “craving for sense pleasures” (taṇhācaritā) perceives my
body is me, my body is in me, I am in my body‘. He perceives vedanā..saññā,..saṅkhāra,..viññāṇa
in the same four ways(e.g., I am my viññāṇa, my viññāṇa is me, my viññāṇa is in me, I am my
viññāṇa) – that is
twenty types of sakkāya diṭṭhi .
§ Thus, there are 5 types of sakkāya diṭṭhi due to uccheda diṭṭhi and 15 types of sakkāya diṭṭhi
due to sassata diṭṭhi.
8. From the same section of WebLink: suttacentral: Nayasamuṭṭhāna of the Nettipakarana, we have
two definitions for uccheda diṭṭhi and sassata diṭṭhi.
“Tattha ye rūpaṃ attato upagacchanti. Vedanaṃ … pe … saññaṃ … saṅkhāre … viññāṇaṃ attato
upagacchanti. Ime vuccanti “ucchedavādino”ti.”
“Ye rūpavantaṃ attānaṃ upagacchanti. Attani vā rūpaṃ, rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ. Ye vedanāvantaṃ …
pe … ye saññāvantaṃ … ye saṅkhāravantaṃ … ye viññāṇavantaṃ attānaṃ upagacchanti, attani vā
viññāṇaṃ, viññāṇasmiṃ vā attānaṃ. Ime vuccanti “sassatavādino”ti, tattha ucchedasassatavādā
ubho antā, ayaṃ saṃsārapavatti.”
Translated: “One with uccheda diṭṭhi (ucchedavādino) perceives “I am my body”, “I am my
vedanā”, “I am my saññā”, “I am my sankhāra”, and “I am my viññāṇa”.
“One with sassata diṭṭhi (sassatavādino) perceives my body is me, my body is in me, I am in my
body‘. He perceives vedanā..saññā,.. saṅkhāra,.. viññāṇa in the same four ways (e.g., I am my
viññāṇa, my viññāṇa is me, my viññāṇa is in me, I am my viññāṇa)”. Those with such extreme
views are bound to the cycle of rebirths (saṃsāra).
9. This verse introduces diving non-Ariyas (puthujjano) into two categories: (1) diṭṭhicarita or those
with personalities dominated by wrong vision of uccheda diṭṭhi. (2) taṇhācarita or those with
personalities dominated by the wrong view of sassata diṭṭhi. If you look at the definitions in #7
above, you will see that a diṭṭhicarita is one with uccheda diṭṭhi, and a taṇhācaritā is one with
sassata diṭṭhi.
§ The last part says that the 20-types of sakkāya diṭṭhi is the combination of uccheda and sassata
diṭṭhis. Since all other 60 diṭṭhis or wrong visions about the world are different combinations or
variations of uccheda and sassata diṭṭhis, 20-types of sakkāya diṭṭhi includes all the wrong
views about “this world”.
Sotāpanna Stage – A New World View
10. Now we look at the last of the verse in #8 above, which gives another clue: “..tattha
ucchedasassatavādā ubho antā, ayaṃ saṃsārapavatti.”
§ Here, “ucchedasassatavādā” results from the combination of uccheda sassata vādā, i.e.,uccheda
vādā and sassata vādā, where vāda means “argument or theory”, or in this case “view”. It says
those two are the two extreme views. [vāda :[m.] theory; saying; creed controversy.]
§ Then it says, “ayaṃ saṃsārapavatti.” That means those two extreme views lead to continuation
of the rebirth process! (saṃsāra pavatti, where “pavattati” means to “continue or sustain”).
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
186 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ This makes perfect sense. One removes sakkāya diṭṭhi (and get to the correct world view) by
getting rid of the two main wrong views about the world of 31 realms, i.e., uccheda diṭṭhi and
sassata diṭṭhi, and any combination of them.
11. If a living being does not cease to exist at the death of the physical body (uccheda diṭṭhi does not
hold) AND if there is no “permanent essence of a being” like a soul or an ātma (sassata diṭṭhi does
not hold), then what is the explanation?
§ Continuation of a lifestream NOT ONLY at the death of the physical body, but at ANY
MOMENT is explained via the principle of causes and conditions (Paticca Samuppāda).
§ One who gets to be a Sotāpanna comprehends this fact, and realizes that there is nothing to be
called “mine”, because in reality there is absolutely nothing that can be under control of
“oneself”; see, “Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“.
§ As long as one does not comprehend that, one will become helpless at some point in the future,
especially when one is reborn in an apāya; see, “Anatta – No Refuge in This World“.
§ This is why getting rid of Sakkāya diṭṭhi REQUIRES one to get rid of any trace of uccheda
diṭṭhi or sassata diṭṭhi.
§ That is not possible until one first gets rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi and gets basic
understanding of the wider world with 31 realms, laws of kamma, existence of a paraloka with
gandhabba, and of course the validity of the rebirth process; also see, “Buddhism without
Rebirth and Nibbana?“.
12. However, this is only a change of diṭṭhi vipallāsa (getting rid of muddled or distorted vision).
There are two more vipallāsa (saññā vipallāsa and citta vipallāsa or “distorted perceptions and
thoughts”) that need to be removed. Those happen at higher stages of Nibbāna; see, “Discourse 3 –
Distorted Perceptions or Saññā Vipallāsa” in “Three Marks of Existence – English Discourses“.
§ Therefore, getting rid of ALL wrong views starts at the Sotāpanna Anugāmi stage, and is firmly
removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ However, all types of vipallāsa are removed step-by-step and are completely removed only at
the Arahant stage; see, the forum discussion “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi and Tilakkhaṇa“.
3.3.7.3 Associations (Sevana) – A Root Cause of Wrong Views
June 29, 2019; revised July 1, 2019 (comment added at the end)
1. Our world views are first formed by our families. Most people just keep those views during their
whole lifetimes. A good example is one’s religion.
§ With the advent of the internet, this is changing. Now, people are exposed to many world
views, and can learn about different world views and decide for themselves which one(s) make
more sense.
§ Still, the basic mindset instilled at a young age can have a long-lasting effect. This is why it is
important to make sure that our children are not exposed to “bad influences”, especially bad
friends.
2. In the terminology of the Buddha, one’s “gati” (habits/character qualities) are determined by one’s
world views and vice versa. Furthermore, whether one acts with avijjā (ignorance) at any given
time depends on one’s gati. In simple terms, “good gati” are associated with Sammā Diṭṭhi (correct
views) and “bad gati” are associated with micchā diṭṭhi (wrong views).
§ This is why Sammā Diṭṭhi comes first in the both the mundane and Noble Eightfold Paths.
§ The basic concepts are discussed in, “Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava” and the posts referred
to there.
§ This is also true at the deeper level; see, #8 of “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi and Tilakkhaṇa” and “Sammā
Diṭṭhi – Realization, Not Memorization“. One’s gati can lead to specific future births.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 187
3. Gati are carried from from life-to-life. However, gati are FORMED mainly during human lives.
§ If a human cultivates an “animal gati“, that human is likely to be born as that animal in the next
life (or a future life). This is explained clearly in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Kukkuravatika
Sutta (MN 57)” (English translation there: “WebLink: suttacentral: The Dog-Duty Ascetic (MN
57)“). There the Buddha explains how those “dog gati” that Seniya was cultivating would lead
to him to be born a dog.
§ Similarly, a human who cultivates “deva gati” by cultivating saṅkhāra that are good and moral
(puññābhisaṅkhāra) — and thus engages in such thoughts, speech, and actions — that human is
likely to be born a deva.
§ A human is born with a certain set of gati acquired in past lives as a human. But a human CAN
change those gati by WILLFULLY cultivating different types of saṅkhāra (and thus one’s
actions). In particular, a human can cultivate “Ariya gati” by cultivating the Noble Eightfold
Path (which means cultivating puññābhisaṅkhāra AND by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa).
4. A human baby has similar gati to his/her parents. That is not an accident. Normally a gandhabba
with gati similar to those of the parents can take possession of the zygote in mother’s womb that was
formed by the union of mother and father; see, “Buddhist Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and
Contraception“.
§ This is another reason that a child would likely to maintain the gati (and thus world views,
religion, behavior patterns) of the parents.
§ However, if the child comes under strong influence of a bad set of friends, those gati can
change for the worse. We discussed an example of a teenager transforming to a drug
addict/gang member in our discussion of Paticca Samuppāda; see, “Phassa paccayā Vedanā…
.to Bhava“.
§ In the same way, that teenager could have been pointed in the right direction if, for example,
the parents themselves started following the Noble Path, and encouraged the teenager to do the
same.
§ Therefore, one’s environment (whom one associates with) can have a major impact on one’s
gati. This is true for adults too, but children can be easily influenced. This is why one MUST
associate with people with “good and moral gati“.
5. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Mangala Sutta (Snp 2.4)“, a deva comes to the Buddha and asks,
“what are the highest auspicious deeds to be cultivated (“brūhi maṅgalamuttamaṃ”); here,
“maṅgalamuttamaṃ” is “mangalam + uttamam”, where “mangala” means “auspicious” and
“uttama” means “highest”).
§ The very first auspicious deed listed by the Buddha is: “Asevanā ca bālānaṃ, paṇḍitānañca
sevanā..” OR, “not to associate with ignorant people (bāla) and to associate with the wise
(paṇḍita)”.
§ In the above I have translated “sevana” as “to associate” and “asevana” as “not to associate”. A
better description would be, “to get advice from and to follow” and “not to get advice from or
to follow”. Sometimes it is not possible to stop “associating” with a group of people, even if
they have bad character qualities. For example, such people may be there at one’s workplace,
and it is not possible to stop interacting with them. However, one does not have to follow their
bad opinions/world views.
§ In the same way, just by “associating with an Ariya” does not necessarily qualify as
“paṇḍitānañca sevanā”. For example, there were many people who associated closely with the
Buddha himself (Devadatta and King of Kosala, for example), who did not profit from that
association: Devadatta was born in the apāyas, and the King of Kosala failed to become a
Sotāpanna.
6. Of course it is prudent to minimize interactions with those with micchā diṭṭhi. However, this again
depends on the context.
§ For example, many prominent scientists have “uccheda diṭṭhi“, that the physical body is all one
has, and life ends at the death of the physical body. This is one of the two major wrong views
associated with sakkāya diṭṭhi (that blocks the Sotāpanna stage); see, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi – Getting
Rid of Deeper Wrong Views“.
§ It is fine to listen to them and even learn from them about MUNDANE things like science.
Most of them have never been exposed to true Buddha Dhamma, and all of them are “moral
people”. I discussed a good example recently (June 27, 2019 at 9:48 am post) at the discussion
forum, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi and Tilakkhaṇa“. As I explained there, Dr. James Tour is correct when
he explains why there is more to life than just the physical body. Furthermore, he explains with
clear evidence why life could not have evolved from “inert matter”.
§ However, since he apparently has not been exposed to true Buddha Dhamma, he cannot think
of a good explanation other than to say that life must have been created by God, and that there
is an everlasting “soul” (i.e., he has sāssata diṭṭhi). I do not blame him; as he firmly believes
(and he is right), life is very complex and it is NOT possible to explain the origins of life by the
theory of evolution.
§ What he has not been exposed to is Buddha’s explanation that life has ALWAYS existed (no
traceable beginning to life) and evolves according to causes and conditions (Paticca
Samuppāda); see, “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
7. Among the four conditions that must be fulfilled to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna,
“Sappurisasaṃsevo” or “Association with “sappurisa (sath + purisa or “Noble friend”, i.e., an
Ariya)” is the first condition; see, “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala“.
§ Since Buddha’s teachings are unique, the true message has to come from a Buddha or someone
“who can be traced back to the Buddha”, as explained in the above post. The teachings can be
explained accurately only by an Ariya who has GRASPED those unique teachings that have
never been known to the world: “pubbe ananussutesu dhammesu..” (see #8 of
“Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta – Introduction“).
§ But it is not necessary to “hang out” or “directly associate” with an Ariya. The key is to “to get
advice from and to follow” such Noble Persons, as explained above. That can be done by
listening to their desanās (discourses) and/or by reading their writings.
§ One cannot attain the Sotāpanna stage while having sakkāya diṭṭhi (i.e., uccheda diṭṭhi or
sāssata diṭṭhi or some combination of the two): see, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi – Getting Rid of Deeper
Wrong Views“.
8. Now we can look into the term “sappurisa” in more detail to get a better picture of the whole
situation. There are many suttas that describe sappurisa/asappurisa in different ways (all related to
each other).
§ For our discussion here, the description given in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Aṭṭhaṅgika Sutta
(AN 4.205)” is more relevant: “Katamo ca, bhikkhave, asappuriso? Idha, bhikkhave, ekacco
micchādiṭṭhiko hoti, micchāsaṅkappo hoti, micchāvāco hoti, micchākammanto hoti,
micchāājīvo hoti, micchāvāyāmo hoti, micchāsati hoti, micchāsamādhi hoti. Ayaṃ vuccati,
bhikkhave, asappuriso“.
§ Translated: “An asappurisa is one who follows micchā diṭṭhi, micchā saṅkappa, micchā vācā,
micchā kammanta, micchā ājīva, micchā vāyāma, micchā sati, and micchā samādhi.
§ In other words, when one has wrong views (micchā diṭṭhi), one thinks in wrong ways, speaks in
wrong ways, acts in wrong ways, follows a wrong livelihood, makes efforts in accomplishing
wrong (or useless) goals, gets to the wrong mindset, and thus ends up with a perturbed state
(and thus is prone to act unwisely).
9. Of course, a sappurisa is one who is on the correct pat with sammā diṭṭhi, sammā saṅkappa hoti,
sammā vācā, sammāka mmanta, sammā ājīva, sammā vāyāma, sammā sati, and sammā samādhi.
§Furthermore, the sutta explains that there is a worse asappurisa, who in addition encourages
others to follow the wrong path.
§ Similarly, there is a better sappurisa, who encourages others to follow the correct path.
10. Another definition of a asappurisa is given in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭipadā Sutta (SN
22.44)“, which is relevant to the present discussion: “Sakkāyasamudayagāminiñca vo, bhikkhave,
paṭipadaṃ desessāmi, sakkāyanirodhagāminiñca paṭipadaṃ.
Taṃ suṇātha. Katamā ca, bhikkhave, sakkāyasamudayagāminī paṭipadā? Idha, bhikkhave, assutavā
puthujjano ariyānaṃ adassāvī ariyadhammassa akovido ariyadhamme avinīto, sappurisānaṃ
adassāvī sappurisadhammassa akovido sappurisadhamme avinīto, rūpaṃ attato samanupassati,
rūpavantaṃ vā attānaṃ; attani vā rūpaṃ, rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ. Vedanaṃ attato … saññaṃ …
saṅkhāre … viññāṇaṃ attato samanupassati, viññāṇavantaṃ vā attānaṃ; attani vā viññāṇaṃ,
viññāṇasmiṃ vā attānaṃ“.
Translated: ““Bhikkhus, I will teach you the way leading to the origination of sakkāya (diṭṭhi) and
the way leading to the cessation of sakkāya (diṭṭhi). The description in blue is exactly same as
discussed in #2 of the post, “Sakkāya Diṭṭhi and Tilakkhaṇa“.
§ The next verse in the sutta states that a sappurisa is one who has removed sakkāya diṭṭhi.
11. Two more relevant terms are “sutavā ariyasāvako” (a Noble person who has comprehended
Buddha Dhamma) and “assutavā puthujjano” (who has not heard/comprehended Buddha Dhamma).
§ The “WebLink: suttacentral: Ānandatthera Sutta (SN 55.13)” describes a “sutavā ariyasāvako”
as one who has “buddhe aveccappasādena samannāgato“, “dhamme aveccappasādena
samannāgato“, “sanghe aveccappasādena samannāgato“, “ariyakantehi sīlehi samannāgato“.
That means one who has “unbreakable faith in the Buddha, Dhamma, Sangha, and unbreakable
moral mindset that would not do an apāyagāmi deed”.
§ Those are actually the four qualities of a Sotāpanna; see, “Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities
of a Sotāpanna“. The key term “aveccappasādena” and “ariyakānta sīla” are discussed in that
post.
§ Again, there are many suttas describe these terms in different (but related) ways. For example,
“WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiyaariyasāvaka Sutta (SN 12.50)” describes a “sutavā ariyasāvaka”
as one who has comprehended Paticca Samuppāda.
§ Therefore, a “sutavā ariyasāvako” is a Noble Person or an Ariya.
§ On the other hand, “assutavā puthujjano” is one who who has not heard/grasped those.
12. Therefore, even a person who may be considered highly moral by mundane standards (like
famous philanthropists, scientists, etc) is likely to be an “asappurisa” or an “assutavā puthujjano“.
That is IF they have micchā diṭṭhi (10 types of micchā diṭṭhi which include sakkāya diṭṭhi). As we
have discussed, sakkāya diṭṭhi is uccheda diṭṭhi or sāssata diṭṭhi or a combination of the two. Such
persons would not be able to guide one on the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Again, that does not mean one cannot learn other useful (mundane) concepts from them.
§ One really needs to avoid those who are engaged in immoral deeds: drug use, excessive alcohol
use, sexual misconduct, etc.
§ In order to make progress on the Noble Path, one should associate (follow and take advice
from) a paṇḍita (wise person) in the context of Buddha Dhamma, i.e., a sappurisa/sutavā
ariyasāvaka. A paṇḍita is not determined by age, educational degrees, or other metrics, but
only based on whether one has removed sakkāya diṭṭhi.
July 1, 2019: Regarding #5 above, it is important to note that āsevana is different from asevana.
§ Sevana is association. Āsevana (Ā + sevana) is “came to associate with”; see, “Āsevana and
Aññamañña Paccayā“.
§ Asevana (A + sevana) is “not to associate with”, the negation as discussed in #5 above.
It is very important to see the difference, which illustrates how Pāli words combine (sandhi) to
produce other words with very different meanings. Thanks to Tobias Große for bringing this
distinction to our attention at the discussion forum today.
3.3.8 Why are Tilakkhana not Included in 37 Factors of Enlightenment?
April 1, 2016
1. It is possible that one may ask, “If anicca, dukkha, anatta are so important, why are they not
included in the 37 Factors of Enlightenment?”. After all, one attains Nibbāna via cultivating the 37
Factors of Enlightenment (also called 37 Bodhipākkhiya Dhamma, or the Dhamma concepts that
takes one to Bodhi or “bhava” + “uddha“, i.e., to Nibbāna; “pākkhiya” means “on the side of”).
§ The key to the answer is that there are two 37 Factors of Enlightenment, one is mundane
(lokiya) and one is transcendental (lokuttara). We have previously discussed that there are two
eightfold paths as well: one mundane and one transcendental; see, “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta
(Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
§ The mundane versions are followed by those who do not comprehend the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca,
dukkha, anatta). Thus Tilakkhaṇa are preconditions (prerequisites) in order to be able to follow
the Noble Path.
2. This is related to the fact that the 37 Factors of Enlightenment were there when Prince Siddhartha
was born. The existence of the mundane version of the 37 Factors of Enlightenment or eightfold
paths is possible only if there has been a previous Buddha in the same mahā kalpa, where a mahā
kalpa is the time span of an “Earth system” or more precisely a solar system with an Earth-like planet
supporting human life (an eon).
§ All Buddhas discover the Tilakkhaṇa, the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path, etc by
their own efforts. But since these Dhamma concepts encompass Nature’s laws, all Buddhas
keep re-discovering the same Dhamma.
§ However, like anything else in this world, a “Buddha Sāsana” or the “original Dhamma
preached by a Buddha” lasts only for a certain time. For Buddha Gotama, his Sāsana is
supposed to last only 5000 years (when the human lifespan is about 100 years), and we are half-
way through.
§ There have been four Buddhas on this Earth (which formed about 4.6 billion years ago), and
Buddha Gotama was the fourth. The three Buddhas preceding him were: Kakusandha,
Konagama, and Kassapa; one more Buddha, Buddha Maitreya, is supposed to appear long after
the Gotama Buddha Sāsana disappears.
3. It is said that a Buddha comes to this world to reveal three words and eight letters (in Pāli):
“Attakkarā theenapadā Sambuddhena pakāsithā, na hi sīla vatan hotu uppajjatthi Tathāgatā“,
which means, “a Buddha (Tathāgatā) is born NOT just to show how to live a moral life, but to reveal
three words to the world“.
§ These three words are: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
4. When a given Buddha Sāsana fades away, it does not disappear abruptly. What happens is that the
true meanings gradually get lost, and are replaced by easier to grasp, mundane meanings; the first to
lose the true meanings are anicca, dukkha, anatta. Without them, all other concepts remain there with
mundane meanings.
§ When the Kassapa Buddha Sāsana faded away, most of the concepts survived only with
mundane meanings and that is why most terms like kamma and even satta bojjhaṅga survived
up to the time of Prince Siddhartha’s birth.
§ In fact, even during a given Buddha Sāsana, the true meanings of Tilakkhaṇa get lost for
periods of time, but are revived by Jāti Sotāpannas (when one attains the Sotāpanna stage, it is
not lost in future lives; so, if one is reborn human, he/she will be a Jāti Sotāpanna). Thus
during a given Buddha Sāsana, such Jāti Sotāpannas keep bringing back the true Dhamma until
the end of that Buddha Sāsana.
§ After that no more Jāti Sotāpannas are born and true Dhamma disappears from this world (or
more correctly from this Earth). Again, the mundane versions may survive for long times.
§ Then the world has to await the appearance of a new Buddha to reveal the true meanings of
anicca, dukkha, anatta. But a mahā kalpa with five Buddhas (like ours) is a very rare event and
it is called Mahā Badda Kalpa.
§ More common is to have no Buddhas or just a single Buddha in a given mahā kalpa. For
example, there were 30 mahā kalpas before this mahā kalpa where there was not even a single
Buddha present.
5. This is why the Buddha emphasized that there is a very brief window of time to attain Nibbāna (at
least to attain the Sotāpanna stage).
§ Time span of each Buddha Sasana is different because the average lifetime of humans keep
changing. Gotama Buddha Sasana is supposed to be 5000 years long, with the average lifetime
of a human being about 100 years. The human lifetime during the Buddha Sasana of Buddha
Kassapa was about 20, 000 years; thus we can guess that Sasana lasted about 20,000 x 50 =
about a million years.
§ Therefore, even though there will be one more Buddha appearing in this mahā kalpa, the total
time during which one could be potentially exposed to Buddha Dhamma would be only a few
million years.
§ Our Earth (i.e., the Solar system) may last a few more billion years, so we can say that the
lifetime of this mahā kalpa is roughly 8-10 billion years or 8000 to 10,000 million years. Only
a few million years, at most, is the “short window” that is available to work towards Nibbāna.
§ Of course, one needs to be fortunate enough to be born human on this Earth during the
Maitreya Buddha Sāsana to get the next opportunity to work towards Nibbāna. This is an
extremely unlikely event for any given person.
§ Also see, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“. Even when
one is born human, most mahā kalpas (eons) will have no Buddhas present to teach the way to
Nibbāna.
6. Going back to our main discussion, when Buddha Kakusandha appeared first in this world (i.e., on
this Earth), there had not been a previous Buddha on this Earth. Therefore, concepts like eightfold
path, saptha bojjanga, 37 Factors of Enlightenment (or terms like kamma and rebirth) were not there
even by name.
§ Now it is clear why those concepts were there before Buddha Gotama (i.e., when Prince
Siddhartha was born). After Buddha Kassapa’s Sāsana faded away, mundane interpretations of
key concepts passed down through generations (initially through vedic traditions which then
transitioned to the Hindu religion; of course most concepts survived only by the name).
§ Therefore, not only concepts like kamma, rebirth, the five (and eight) precepts were there when
Prince Siddhartha was born, but also saptha bojjanga and ways to attain jhānas. Of course,
those meanings were mundane and the jhānas were anariya jhānas. Without Tilakkhaṇa, it is
not possible to attain Ariya jhānas.
7. The difference that the Buddha Gotama made was to bring back the true Dhamma that is based on
the true nature of this world, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta. But even during a given Buddha Sāsana, the
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
192 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
true Dhamma starts to fade away from time to time (people have tendency to embrace the easy and
mundane version) and needs to revived by a jāti Sotāpanna.
§ And that is what is happening even at the present time. The true Dhamma of Buddha Gotama
had again started to fade away, and a jāti Sotāpanna in Sri Lanka is bringing back the correct or
lokuttara version now. Within the past 2500 years, it had happened at least one time before, and
we will discuss that when the time is appropriate.
8. The difference between the two versions of the 37 Factors of Enlightenment or the eightfold paths
is that the Noble versions are based on Tilakkhaṇa: anicca, dukkha, anatta. Their true meaning is that
it is fruitless, tiring, and often dangerous, to keep struggling to attain happiness in this world; that is
the real meaning of dukha or suffering. And Dukkha Sacca (First Noble Truth) is that this dukha
(suffering) can be overcome; see the second part of the following post: “Anatta and Dukkha – True
Meanings“.
§ The mundane versions can be grasped by a normal human who is unaware of the true
Tilakkhaṇa or the true nature this world. The transcendental or lokuttara versions can be
comprehended only with an understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Without an understanding of the anicca nature, we perceive that sense pleasures are good, and
are worth striving for. But when one starts comprehending the anicca nature, one realizes that
suffering is actually rooted in sense pleasures; see, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
9. But the Tilakkhaṇa (starting with anicca nature) are hard to comprehend. It helps to understand
and follow the mundane versions of Dhamma concepts first; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and
the post “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?” referred to in that chart.
§ Not everyone can grasp the deeper meanings of the anicca, dukkha, anatta right way. It takes a
significant effort. After all, a Sotāpanna is better off than an Emperor or a King (see, “Why a
Sotāpanna is Better off than any King, Emperor, or a Billionaire“), and one should not think it
can be done easily (even though it may be easier for those who happen to have cultivated the
Path in recent previous births).
10. To summarize, the critical difference between the two types of 37 Factors of Enlightenment is the
following:
§ The mundane (lokiya) 37 Factors of Enlightenment are cultivated with the goal of leading a
“moral life” and to seek “good rebirths” in future lives.
§ The transcendental (lokuttara) 37 Factors of Enlightenment are cultivated with the goal of
attaining Nibbāna, AFTER one realizes that this world of 31 realms has nothing but suffering to
offer in the long run.
§ The 37 factors are named the same in both versions, but each term has a deeper meaning in the
lokuttara version, since it has Nibbāna as the goal.
§ As one starts to grasp the meanings of Tilakkhaṇa, one will automatically transition over to the
lokuttara version. There is no need to worry about which version one is cultivating. The
difference is not in the terms, but in grasping the anicca (and thus dukkha and anatta)
nature.
§ Furthermore, it is not necessary to cultivate (or even to memorize) all 37 factors. When one
cultivates even one factor, all 37 grow together; but it is good to know what those factors and
how they work together. The 37 factors are listed in “37 Factors of Enlightenment“.
11. There are a lot of things to contemplate about in the above material, so I will continue this
discussion on the 37 factors in a follow-up post. Some of the ideas discussed above may seem
surprising (but also illuminating to those who may have been wondering about how terms like kamma
and satta bojjhaṅga were in usage before Buddha Gotama). They will turn out to be supported by
future evidence and also by the inter-consistency that I always try to emphasize.
§ Even though we may not have all the evidence of historical facts (they keep emerging slowly),
there is no need to wait for fool-proof archaeological evidence.
§ One can analyze and examine the “bigger picture” of the Buddha, the soundness of
Abhidhamma, and the solid inter-consistency of Buddha Dhamma to realize that the above
explanation must be correct. Of course, we will discuss much more details in future posts.
§ In many areas, I have been able to publish only a small fraction of material due to time
limitations, and because I also keep learning things. I will not publish anything that I have
doubts about. It is immensely satisfying to be able to figure out a “missing piece” and to be able
to “see the bigger picture” with more clarity. It is also amazing how deep, consistent, and
wonderful Buddha Dhamma is.
3.3.9 Two Versions of 37 Factors of Enlightenment
April 8, 2016
1. In the previous post, we discussed the fact that there are two versions of 37 Factors of
Enlightenment (Bodhipākkhiya Dhamma) as well as two versions of eightfold paths. Here we
continue that discussion.
2. Throughout the website, I have tried to make the case that there are three broad categories that
people can be divided into :
§ Those who have one or more of the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi; see, “Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi,
Eightfold Paths, and Samādhi“.
§ Those who have been exposed to some form of Buddha Dhamma, have removed micchā diṭṭhi
and thereby have the mundane (lokiya) version of sammā diṭṭhi.
§ Then there are those who have transcendental (lokuttara) Sammā Diṭṭhi, i.e., they truly
comprehend the true nature of this of 31 realms (anicca, dukkha, anatta), i.e., that there is
hidden suffering in what we perceive to be enjoyment.
3. When one is exposed to Buddha Dhamma, one can understand the need for the wider world view
with 31 realms, and that beings are born in all those realms due to their actions (kamma). This leads
to getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and “What is Unique in Buddha
Dhamma?”.
§ When one gets rid of micchā diṭṭhi, one has the mundane sammā diṭṭhi: One knows that in
order to avoid future births in the apāyas (four lowest realms) one needs to avoid immoral
deeds (akusala kamma) and to cultivate moral deeds.
§ With mundane sammā diṭṭhi, one also strives to accumulate kusala by doing puñña kriya or
good deeds; this leads to gaining āyusa (long life), vanna (healthiness) , sukha (mundane
happiness), bala (wealth) and , paññā (wisdom) in future lives. That enables one to grasp
Tilakkhaṇa Normally, those who are born with
in future lives, if one fails to do so in this life.
tihetuka paṭisandhi will have those qualities in this life. I will discuss this in the future post.
4. Now let us talk specifically about the mundane 37 Factors of Enlightenment, which is tied to the
mundane sammā diṭṭhi. There is no specific order because they are all inter-related. But for
convenience, we could use the following guide:
When one knows what is right (moral or kusala) and what is not (immoral or akusala), there are four
obvious things to do. These are called satara Sammappadhāna, which is conventionally translated as
Four Supreme Efforts. One exerts to:
§ 00 prevent immoral qualities that have not yet arisen from arising
§ 01 abandon immoral qualities that have arisen
§ 10 initiate moral qualities that have not yet arisen to arise
======================================================
1. Not to let an unwholesome thought arise which has not yet arisen.
2. Not to let an unwholesome thought continue which has already arisen.
3. To make a wholesome thought arise which has not yet arisen.
4. To make a wholesome thought continue which has already arisen.
They can briefly be expressed as "avoiding," "overcoming," "developing," and "maintaining," and are
called the four supreme efforts.
======================================================
By the way, these are intimately related to viriya in some other categories in the 37 factors: Satara
Iddhipada, Panca Indriya, Panca Bala, Satta Bojjhaṅga, and the Noble Eightfold Path.
5. In a way, one could make a whole lot of progress (whether mundane or lokuttara) by focusing on
the Satara Sammappadhāna. The word sammappadhana comes from “san” + “ma” + “padhāna“. We
have previously discussed “sammā” or “san” + “ma” means getting rid of defilements; see, “What is
“San”?“. In Pāli or Sinhala, “padhāna” or “pradhāna” means dominant or leading. Satara is of
course four.
§ Therefore, Satara Sammappadhāna means four key methods for getting rid of defilements,
i.e., for cleansing the mind.
§ If we can get to the habit of following the four guidelines listed in #4, then we will be
cleansing our minds with time.
6. Satara Satipaṭṭhāna (Four Foundations of Mindfulness) helps one with the four tasks listed in #4 by
being vigilant. These are discussed in detail in several posts in the “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
§ Basically, one keeps vigilant about committing immoral deeds with the body (kayanupassana),
and becomes good at not reacting automatically to feelings (vedananupassana) or thoughts
(cittanupassana), and when in doubt about the suitability of a given action one is about to do,
compare with what is in the Dhamma (dhammanupassana).
§ We have not discussed dhammanupassana in the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta yet, and we can go
to great depths. But we can get a simple idea from what “dhamma” means: Dhamma is what
one bears. If one engages in activities that lead to great suffering to another (say, rape or
murder), then one has accumulated a “bad Dhamma” that will yield to corresponding results
(paṭicca samuppāda) in future lives in the four lowest realms. Similarly, if one acts with
kindness one grows Dhamma suitable to be born in human or higher realms.
§ Thus one should think about the consequences of bad actions one is about to do and stop such
an action; on the other hand one can be joyful about a good act that one is about to do or has
done, and acquire much merits that will lead to ayusa, vanna , sukha, bala and paññā as
discussed in #3 above.
7. Then there are Satara Iddhipada or the Four Bases of Mental Power; see, “The Four Bases of
Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“. When someone has a firm goal, one develops chanda (liking for
it), citta (think about it always), viriya (make efforts on it), and vimansa (finds out all relevant
information).
§ That completes the “three sets of fours” in the 37 Factors of Enlightenment. Next there are “two
sets of fives”.
8. The Panca Indriya (Five Mental Faculties) are: saddhā (faith based on knowledge), viriya (effort),
sati (mindfulness), samādhi (calming of the mind), and paññā (wisdom).
§ These five factors helps one move forward on the Dhamma path. It is like a vehicle with two
sets of wheels with a driver: Sati is in front and can be compared to the driver; saddhā and
paññā are the two front wheels, and viriya and samādhi are like the back wheels.
§ All five needs to be cultivated together, in particular those sets need to be balanced: one cannot
move forward with saddhā without paññā, or just by sheer effort (viriya) without feeling the
benefits in samādhi.
9. When the Panca Indriya are cultivated, they grow and become Panca Bala or the Five Powers.
§ These “two sets of five” are discussed in detail in “Panca Indriya and Panca Bala – Five
Faculties and Five Powers“.
10. Next, there is Saptha Bojjanga or the Seven Factors of Enlightenment.
§ These seven factors are: dhammavicaya (which is closely related to vimansa and paññā), viriya
(effort), pīti (joy), passaddhi(tranquility), samādhi (one-pointedness), and upekkha
(equanimity).
§ Here again, sati should be in front and the other six are better cultivated in two sets; see, “11.
Magga Phala and Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“. In that post, the Saptha
Bojjanga are those for the lokuttara Path, but as I mentioned before, the procedures are the
same with deeper meanings.
11. Finally, there is the Ariya Attangika Magga or the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Of course it has been discussed in many posts throughout the site. One could enter “Noble
Eightfold Path” in the Search box on top right and get a list of relevant posts.
§ A table in the post, “37 Factors of Enlightenment” shows how many of the factors in different
categories overlap.
§ Therefore, there is no need to try to cultivate each factor. It is much better to concentrate on one
category: Satara Samppadhana or Satara Satipaṭṭhāna are common ones. When further along
the Path, one could cultivate Saptha Bojjanga. Of course, the Noble Eightfold Path
encompasses all.
12. The cultivation of the mundane sammā diṭṭhi together with contemplation of “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta” gradually moves one to transcendental (lokuttara) sammā diṭṭhi.
§ Then one will gradually switch over to the lokuttara 37 Factors of Enlightenment. Like a train
smoothly switching railway tracks at a railroad switch, one will move over to the lokuttara
track at some point; it happens in one citta vīthi and one may not even realize it for a
while.There is no need to worry about which one to be followed. As the meanings of anicca,
dukkha, anatta sink in, one will start seeing the deeper aspects of the 37 Factors of
Enlightenment.
13. In fact, one will truly comprehend the Four Noble Truths starting from that point. One truly start
grasping the First Noble Truth (Dukkha Sacca), only when one comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Again, this is why the first three Noble Truths are also not listed under the 37 Factors of
Enlightenment. In the previous post we discussed why the Tilakkhaṇa are not included; see,
“Why are Tilakkhaṇa not Included in 37 Factors of Enlightenment?“.
§ Comprehension of anicca, dukkha, anatta, at least to some extent, at the Sotāpanna stage helps
one grasp the first Noble Truth, i.e., that this world is filled with suffering and that it can be
overcome.
§ The lokuttara version of the 37 Factors of Enlightenment — which describes ways to get to
Nibbāna or Enlightenment — requires the comprehension of the Tilakkhaṇa and the first three
Noble Truths first.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
196 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Even before grasping anicca, dukkha, anatta, one can clearly see the dangers of a defiled mind,
and be motivated to follow the mundane Path with mundane sammā diṭṭhi.
14. Therefore, it is better not to think much about which version of the 37 Factors of Enlightenment
one is following. In fact, there is no need to think in terms of those factors.
§ The key is to gradually purify one’s mind: “ragakkhayo Nibbanan, dosakkhayo Nibbanan,
Mohakkhayo Nibbanan“, i.e., Nibbāna or Niveema or “cooling down” is achieved by getting rid
of greed, hate, and ignorance in steps.
§ It happens with even the mundane Path, but accelerates when switching over to the lokuttara
Path.
§ The “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” section could be useful in following a systematic path. But it is
essential to read different posts on varying subjects, starting at the “Moral Living and
Fundamentals” section. It could be harder to grasp advanced topics, say, on “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta“, without grasping the fundamentals.
3.3.10 Types of Bodies in 31 Realms – Connection to Jhāna
1. Even before the Buddha, people had three different basic ideas about “the essence” of a living
being and specifically a human.
§ Just like today, many people believed that the current physical body is all that is there. When
one dies, that is the end of the story. One’s body would decompose and be absorbed to the
Earth. Nothing at all will be left over, either physical or mental. The physical body is called
“karaja kaya” in Buddha Dhamma.
§ However, there was another view that there is something that survives the physical death of the
body. This is the same as the concept of a “soul” in major religions today. In Abrahamic
religions today, it is believed that upon death, the soul will either go to heaven or hell and will
forever remain there.
§ So, those are the two main views about “the essence” of a human being today.
2. However, at the time of the Buddha, those with the second view of a surviving “mental body”
were split into two camps. In order to understand that, we need to remember that there were yogis
who were able to get into jhānās and also had some supernormal (abhiññā) powers.
§ There are three kinds of “pleasures”, as we discussed in the post, “Three Kinds of Happiness –
What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“. Two of these are “mundane pleasures”, associated with the 31
realms of this world.
§ One is of course the “physical sense pleasures”: those associated with pictures, sounds, food,
smells, and touches. That is what most humans experience. In fact, these are the pleasures
associated with the 11 realms in the kāma loka (four lowest realms, human realm, and the 6
deva realms).
§ The second are the jhānic pleasures, and those are of two varieties: rūpāvacara jhāna and
arūpāvacara jhāna.
3. If one can cultivate jhānās, one can experience “jhānic pleasures”. Unlike the pleasures associated
with the physical senses, jhānic pleasures are associated with less and less with the dense physical
body as one gets to higher jhāna.
§ Of course, jhānic pleasures have nothing to do with seeing nice objects, hearing nice music,
eating tasty foods, smelling nice odors, or physical touching.
§ In the first four jhānās, one just experiences fine bodily feelings (lightness in the body etc) as
well as mental happiness. By the time one gets to the fourth jhāna, almost all “bodily
sensations” fade out and only “rūpa” that is left is a “white soothing light”. So, by the fourth
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 197
jhāna, one loses any awareness of one’s own physical body, i.e., the only “matter” one
experiences is that of light.
§ We must remember that light is a rūpa in Buddha Dhamma, even though it is a “very fine
rūpa“. In fact, in quantum mechanics, photons (light) and electrons (matter) are treated on the
same footing.
4. The four rūpāvacara jhānās correspond to mental states of the rūpāvacara brahmas, i.e., those
brahma in the rūpa loka realms. Now we can see why those rūpāvacara brahmas do not have dense
bodies.
§ They do not need dense bodies! Brhamas do not eat, smell nice fragrances, or engage in
sex.
§ Those humans who can get to the fourth jhāna can cultivate the ability to separate the “brhama-
like mental body” from the solid physical body. That means the “mental body” — called
manomaya kāya — can come out of the physical body.
§ This manomaya kāya essentially has the seat of the mind (hadaya vatthu) and the five pasāda
rūpa for sensing vision, sounds, smells, taste, and touch.
§ As we mentioned above, the physical body is called the karaja kaya.
5. The Buddha gave several analogies to describe this separation of the manomaya kāya from the
karaja kaya. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2):
“..Seyyathā vā pana, mahārāja, puriso asiṃ kosiyā pavāheyya. Tassa evamassa: ‘ayaṃ asi, ayaṃ
kosi, añño asi, aññā kosi, kosiyā tveva asi pavāḷho’ti. Seyyathā vā pana, mahārāja, puriso ahiṃ
karaṇḍā uddhareyya. Tassa evamassa: ‘ayaṃ ahi, ayaṃ karaṇḍo. Añño ahi, añño karaṇḍo, karaṇḍā
tveva ahi ubbhato’ti.”
§ Translated: “..suppose a man were to draw a sword out from its scabbard (sheath). He would
think: “This is the sword; this is the scabbard. The sword is one thing, the scabbard another, but
the sword has been drawn out from the scabbard”. Or suppose a man were to pull a snake out
from its old outer skin. He would think: “This is the snake; this is the old skin. The snake is one
thing, the old skin another, but the snake has been pulled out from the old skin”.
§ Therefore, separating the manomaya kāya from the karaja kaya is just like pulling out a sword
from its sheath: sword is the “active element” and the sheath is like the karaja kaya. In the
analogy: “A snake shedding its old skin”, snake is like the manomaya kāya and old skin is like
the karaja kaya“.
§ Manomaya kaya is the “active or important element”.
6. The bodies of the rūpāvacara brahmas are very similar to the manomaya kāya of those yogis who
can get to those rūpāvacara jhāna.
§ The only difference is that the manomaya kāya of the rūpāvacara brahmas do not have the
three pasāda rūpa for smelling, tasting, or touch.
§ Rūpāvacara brahama‘s fine bodies have just the hadaya vatthu (seat of the mind) and two
pasāda rūpa for seeing and hearing.
§ Of course, they do not need eyes. They see and hear using a different method. Seeing by those
brahmas is similar to how we see dreams with our eyes closed.
7. This manomaya kāya is the same one that enters the womb at conception.
§ We remember that a gandhabba has a manomaya kāya as well as fine, misty-like body due to
inhaling aroma. When a gandhabba enters a womb, this “extra bit of matter” is shed and only
the manomaya kāya (of the size of a few suddhāshtaka) enters the womb.
§ We also remember that these five pasāda rūpa are the actual sensing elements. When the
manomaya kāya is inside a physical body, they get the signals THROUGH the five physical
senses: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body. Those signals are analyzed by the brain and
transmitted to the manomaya kāya inside the physical body.
§ That can be compared to a human sitting inside a totally enclosed military tank seeing the
outside with aid of cameras mounted on the body of the tank. This is discussed in “Our Mental
Body – Gandhabba“.
8. When a yogi cultivates the fourth jhāna and perfects it, he/she will be able to come out of the
physical body or the karaja kaya at will.
§ Just like a rūpāvacara brahma, these yogis who come out of the physical body with just the
manomaya kāya can “see” and “hear” over great distances.
§ Of course we have hard time imagining that. But it can be compared to what happens when we
see a dream. There is no need for eyes or light to see dreams; we see dreams when it is pitch
black at night with our eyes closed; we do not “see” dreams with our eyes.
9. In some stressful situations (like heart operations), the manomaya kāya can separate from the
physical body, and that is what is called the “out-of-body experience (OBE)”.
§ It also happens to some who had almost died, but “manage to come back to life”. These are also
called Near-Death Experiences (NDE).
§ There are many books written on OBE and NDE. “Consciousness Beyond Life”, by Pim van
Lommel (2010) gives detailed accounts of case studies of OBE experienced by people
undergoing heart operations.
10. This manomaya kāya (with a hadaya vatthu and five pasāda rūpa) that can be separated from the
karaja kaya was called “rūpi manomaya kāya” by those yogis at the time of the Buddha.
It is called “rūpi manomaya kāya” because it has all five pasāda rūpa and thus essentially has all
five senses. Even though one cannot move solid objects with the fine body, one will be able to
“touch”. Just like vision is not with physical eyes, all five “physical senses” are different than with
physical body.
§ There is a second type of manomaya kāya discussed by the Buddha in the WebLink:
suttacentral: Poṭṭhapāda Sutta (DN 9). This was called “arūpi saññāmaya kaya”. We will
discuss that in the next post. These bodies or “kaya” are associated with arūpāvacara
brahmas (and thus arūpāvacara jhānās).
§ It could be a good idea to get refresh the memory on what is meant by saññā: “Saññā – What It
Really Means”.
§ Basically, when one recognizes an object or understands a concept, then one has “an
understanding” of what it is. That is what saññā is. So, an “arūpi saññāmaya kaya” basically
means a “body (almost) devoid of matter but has the ability to recognize/understand”.
3.3.11 Finest Manomaya Kāya of an Arūpāvacara Brahma
1. As we discussed in the previous post, we can get some insights on “what survives the death of a
physical body” by analyzing jhānic experiences; see, “Types of Bodies in 31 Realms – Connection
to Jhāna“.
§ As discussed there, one can experience for oneself that life is possible without a heavy, solid
physical body. This can be experienced for oneself by cultivating jhāna.
§ There are many people even today who can experience jhāna, especially up to the fourth jhāna.
2. When one gets to the first jhāna, one “transcends” (or go beyond) the kāma loka or “sense sphere”.
Our human realm is one of 11 realms in the kāma loka as we discussed before.
§ There are 16 realms in “rūpa loka” where rūpāvacara brahmas live and there are 4 realms in
“arūpa loka” where arūpāvacara brahmas live. Those are the 31 realms.
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Anupubbanirodha Sutta (AN 9.31): “Paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
samāpannassa kāmasaññā niruddhā hoti” OR ““When one has attained the first jhāna,
perceptions of sensuality (kāma saññā) stop from arising“.
§ That means kāma sankappa (or sensual thoughts) would not arise in the yogi. However, the
yogi still feels his/her physical body. Those “bodily sensations” decrease as the yogi attains
from the first to the fourth jhāna.
§ Those jhānic levels one through four correspond to the 16 rūpāvacara brahma realms.
3. If the yogi can advance above the fourth jhāna, he/she next gets into the fifth jhāna which has a
different mental experience. Jhānās fifth through eighth are called arūpāvacara jhāna.
§ The fifth jhāna or the first of the arūpāvacara jhāna is called the ākāsānancāyatana.
§ Even though those arūpāvacara jhāna are labelled as fifth through eighth jhāna these days, in
suttas they are just called by their names: ākāsānancāyatana, viññāṇañcāyatana,
ākiñcaññāyatana, nevasaññānāsaññāyatana.
§ The experiences of yogis in arūpāvacara jhāna are similar to those of arūpāvacara brahmas
in the highest 4 realms in the 31 realms.
4. Those arūpāvacara brahmas cannot even see or hear, unlike the rūpāvacara brahmas.
§ Those arūpāvacara brahmas have just a trace of matter: a hadaya vatthu, which is the seat of
the mind. However, unlike rūpāvacara brahmas, they do not have pasāda rūpa for seeing and
hearing.
§ They only have an awareness (saññā) of existence. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Poṭṭhapāda
Sutta (DN 9) (and other suttas) this “third type of body” is called an “arupi saññāmaya
kaya“.
§ Arupi means “without rūpa” (it actually has a trace of rūpa, just the hadaya vatthu).
Saññāmaya means “with saññā”, i.e., one can still experience that one is still alive, one has
perception (saññā).
5. It may be a good idea to re-read the following posts in this series just to firmly grasp these key
ideas. Then it would be easier to follow the upcoming discussions. The first was, “Anattā (Mundane
Interpretation) – No ‘Unchanging Self’”.
§ We discussed in the second post that the manomaya kāya (with a hadaya vatthu and five
pasāda rūpa) that can be separated from the karaja kaya was called “rupi manomaya kāya” by
those yogis at the time of the Buddha:”Types of Bodies in 31 Realms – Connection to Jhāna“.
§ With that extremely small manomaya kāya, a rupavacara brahma or a yogi who can come out
of the physical body can hear and see. Since this manomaya kāya is much smaller than an atom,
this is something that is hard for us to even imagine.
§ However, those who experience out-of-body experiences, that is exactly what happens. So, this
effect has been experienced by many people; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“.
6. Now we can summarize what we have figured out so far: Any living being is born with a basic
manomaya kāya that comes in three basic varieties:
§ Those in kāma loka have a manomaya kāya with hadaya vatthu and five pasāda rūpa (i.e., all
six “sensing elements”. That manomaya kāya is “enclosed in” in a solid physical body
(karaja kaya) that allows one to experience “sense pleasures”.
§ In the 16 rūpāvacara brahma realms, the manomaya kāya has two pasāda rūpa (for vision and
hearing), in addition to the seat of the mind (hadaya vatthu).
§ The finest manomaya kāya is in the arūpa loka (4 arūpāvacara brahma realms), which only
has the hadaya vatthu. They can only think.
7. There are 11 realms in kāma loka (four apāyās, human realm, and 6 deva realms).
§ The six deva realms belong to the kāma loka, and all those devas have “physical
bodies” (karaja kaya) but they are finer than those of humans.
§ Of course, a solid physical body (karaja kaya) is not there for either a rūpāvacara or an
arūpāvacara brahma.
8. By the way, we can now see how suffering decreases as one starts at the lowest realms (apāyās)
and move up to human, deva, and brahma realms. Human realm is where both suffering and
happiness are present. Sense pleasures are optimum in deva realms.
§ However, sense pleasures are not available in brahma realms. But the jhānic pleasures in those
brahma realms are much better than sense pleasures.
§ Thoughts of greed and hate/anger cannot arise in any brahma, including rūpāvacara brahmas.
This is why their minds are at peace.
9. That is also true of those who can get into the corresponding jhānās. While in those jhāna,
thoughts of greed or hate/anger do no arise.
§ This is as close as one can get to Nibbāna, without even comprehending Buddha Dhamma. As
we know, yogis were able to get to those jhānās even before the Buddha by using breath or
kasina meditations.
§ If those yogis do not lose the ability to get into jhāna until death, they will be born in the
corresponding brahma realms. However, since they have only SUPPRESSED greed and hate,
they will come back down to the human realm at the end of “brahma bhava“. Subsequently,
they can eventually end up in the lowest four realms (apāyās).
10. So, now we can see that there are two types of jhānic pleasures, and that those two varieties give
rise to “two types of mental bodies or manomaya kāya” (in addition to the dense body or the
karaja kaya that we are familiar with).
§ However, a human who cultivates jhāna and even get to the highest arūpāvacara jhāna (8th
jhāna), will still have the human manomaya kāya that he/she was born with.
§ If a yogi comes out of the physical body with that manomaya kāya, it would have five pasāda
rūpa and a hadaya vatthu.
11. Therefore, that manomaya kāya that can be separated from the physical body of a human would
have all five pasāda rūpa that are the actual “sensing elements” for seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling,
and touching. Of course the “seat of the mind” — or the hadaya vatthu — would also come out with
those five pasāda rūpa.
§ This is because it is not possible to separate any pasāda rūpa form the manomaya kāya that is
born at the beginning of the human bhava.
§ In fact, it is that manomaya kāya that lives as a gandhabba in between two adjacent human
births (jāti) until a suitable womb becomes available for it to enter.
12. In Buddha Dhamma, the closest equivalent of a “soul” is the “manomaya kāya” or the “mental
body”. However, it is not the same an unchanging soul.
§ As we saw, manomaya kāya will take fundamentally different forms in the three types of loka
that encompasses the 31 realms: kāma loka, rūpa loka, and arūpa loka.
§ Furthermore, even during the human bhava, the manomaya kāya can undergo drastic changes.
When one attain jhāna or magga phala, it will undergo significant changes. In the case of
magga phala, those changes are permanent.
13. In the next post, we will summarize the information that we have discussed so far with reference
to key sections in the WebLink: suttacentral: Poṭṭhapāda Sutta (DN 9).
§ In that sutta, the Buddha explained those three types of “kaya” to Potthapāda, who was asking
whether there exists an “absolute, unchanging, self” or an attā in the deeper sense (just
like a “soul” that would have a “permanent existence” in heaven or hell in Abrahamic
religions today).
§ It must be kept in mind that the above descriptions provide only the basic framework of the
three types of loka (kāma loka, rūpa loka, and arūpa loka), that encompass the 31 realms.
§ However, that is sufficient to get a good idea about the key differences among the 31 realms.
§ Furthermore, it explains a deeper meaning of “attā“.
1. Many people have questions about exactly where bhava and kamma beeja are “located” or
“stored”. This is a bit hard to explain simply because we have no “feel” for mental phenomena. We
have a hard time connecting with anything that is not discernible to our five physical senses; we need
to see, hear, taste, smell, or touch to feel confident that “something is real”.
§ Yet, if one makes an effort, it is quite possible to get a good idea of what these are. Actually,
modern science helps here too.
§ If someone is serious about figuring this out, I would really recommend reading the posts,
“Difference between a Wish and a Determination (Paramita)” and, especially, “Recent
Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)” first.
2. From the second post above, It is clear that complete records of ALL our past activities during
even just this life will be impossible to be “stored” in the neurons in the brain. There are people who
can remember EVERYTHING that happened to them over many years, in minute detail.
§ The Buddha said those memories are in the mano loka (“nāma thalaya” in Sinhala) which could
be called the “mind plane”; those memories in the mano loka come to our mind via mana
indriya in the brain: “WebLink: suttacentral: Indriyakathā” (no details are given in this link).
§ It is not stored in a physical device like a tape. Mano loka is devoid of any material things, it is
all “nāma“. It can be thought of as in a “different dimension”; new theories in physics say our
universe has dimensions that we cannot “see”.
§ The closest analogy we have to the mental plane is the “dream world”. When we dream, we can
“hear”, “see” and “do” things but it is all “nāma“. When we “playback” memories, it is
somewhat like seeing a dream.
§ We can recall our memories (whatever we can remember) very quickly. If we have a strong
memory of some event, even from many years ago, we can recall it in our mind
instantaneously. We just think about it and we can “see” it playback with sounds and the
background just like it happened. Our minds can connect to the “mind plane” and recall things
without a delay; see, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
§ In this “recall process”, the brain acts as the intermediary; the brain (actually the mana indriya
in the brain) acts like a “transmitter” and a “receiver” in communications with the mental plane.
As we get old, the brain gets weaker and thus the “recall power” gets diminished. Meditation
(especially dhamma vicaya or contemplation on dhamma concepts) helps keep the brain
healthy.
§ It is just that some (few) people are born with the ability to recall ANYTHING from this life, as
that post on memory records (HSAM) described. This ability can be also cultivated by
developing abhiññā powers as I discussed in another post.
3. When we “wish or hope for something” that thought will have a record of that in the mano
loka too; later, we can recall that we made such a “wish”.
§ While a “nāmagotta” (I have written this as nāma gotta too) is just a record, a wish has certain
energy in it, but if not cultivated by further thinking and doing things relevant to that wish, that
energy will soon fade away.
§ When we make a “determination” that has more “javana power” than just a “wish” and such
records are stronger, i.e., they do not fade away quickly.
§ Our wishes, determinations, cravings for things, future plans, etc are all saṅkhāra (moral and
immoral). Some of them are strong and become abhisaṅkhāra. They all lead to “kamma beeja
(seeds)” or varying strengths. Some are strong enough to lead to rebirths; others bring vipāka
during a lifetime. They can be good or bad.
§ Thus “dhammo ha ve rakkati dhammacari” or “dhamma will guide those who live according to
dhamma” applies to both “good” and “bad” dhamma: Moral people will be guided upwards,
and immoral people will be guided downward. Mother nature is neutral; each one chooses
which way to proceed. However, the results are ALWAYS according to kamma or actions;
see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
4. Therefore, records of both past “nama gotta” and our mind activities associated with “future plans”
(which are same as “kamma beeja“) are in the mind plane. The difference is that past “namagotta”
are permanent and have no energy to do anything, while the records of “future plans” are in
flux and can get stronger or fade away.
§However, the record for even a determination (whether or not fulfilled yet) will be recorded in
the mind plane, because just after passing away it is in the past and that thought becomes a
record in “namagotta“. For example, if one makes a determination to kill another person, that
thought will be recorded in the mental plane as a namagotta. In addition, there will be a
tentative record of a “kamma beeja” associated with the future too. The more he thinks and
plans, the stronger the “kamma beeja” gets. If, somehow he comes to his senses and discard that
thought the “future” imprint (and associated energy) will fade away, and there will not be a
“kamma beeja” associated with it anymore.
§ When one is thinking about a good or a bad act, it has not acquired the “full kammic potential”,
i.e., it is said that the “kamma patha” is not complete. If that person ended up killing the other
person, then the “kamma patha” is complete and there will be a “kamma beeja” established that
will be there up to 91 mahā kalpas (a mahā kalpa is the lifetime of a universe, roughly 30
billion years).
§ If that strong “kamma beeja” brings about a bad rebirth thus depleting its energy, at that point
that result (new birth) now becomes a “namagotta” or just a record.
§ This is a simple overview of what happens; if one contemplates it, one should be able to get an
idea of the concept.
5. Depending on the nature of the deed, a “kamma beeja” may be in different types of “bins”, called
“kamma bhava“.
§ For example, if someone cultivates rūpa jhānas, then the associated kamma beeja will be in the
“rupaloka bhava” or simply, “rūpa bhava“. If another cultivates arūpa jhānas (one of the
highest four jhānas), then the associated kamma beeja will be in “arūpa bhava” and when that
kamma beeja releases its energy, he/she will be born in the arūpa loka.
§ All other (abhi)saṅkhāra will bring about vipāka in the kāma loka (deva, human realms and
the four lowest realms). We will discuss this in more detail in the next post.
§ To summarize: When we do a kamma (abhisaṅkhāra), we generate certain energy called a
kamma beeja that will be “stored” in the appropriate “bhava” in the mind plane. When the
vipāka associated with a kamma beeja is experienced, that energy is spent and only a record of
that (namagotta) survives in the mind plane.
Click to open and print the above chart: WebLink: Mind Plane Drawing
§ As the chart shows, we make “kamma beeja” of varying strengths in various “bhava”
during a lifetime that will lead to more rebirths as well as uncountable kamma vipāka
during those rebirths.
6. Another important point is that there are two ways to “bypass” a strong “kamma beeja” associated
with such a “kamma patha” of, say, killing of a human.
§ He could realize the enormity of the deed, ask for forgiveness in his mind (genuinely), and start
engaging in moral deeds, then he may be able to “wear out” some of the energy of that “kamma
beeja“. More importantly, if he can cultivate Ariya metta bhāvanā, he may be able to wear
it out completely (unless it is one of the anantariya kamma, like killing a parent); see, “5.
Ariya Metta Bhāvanā“.
§ The other way is of course to attain the Arahanthood. Unless that particular “kamma seed”
brings about the vipāka before that Arahant passes away, it will become null at the death of the
Arahant.
§ Furthermore, if that “kamma seed” is not that strong and does not bring vipāka within 91 mahā
kalpas, then it will become null and void too. Only the “nāmagotta” are permanent, “kamma
beeja” are waiting for appropriate conditions to bring vipāka and are changing with time.
However, “nāmagotta” just records, but “kamma beeja” have the energy to bring about results
(vipāka).
7. There are special cases where a “kamma beeja” (and associated “kamma bhava“) WILL NOT
change. An anantariya kamma establishes a “kamma beeja” (and “kamma bhava“) that WILL bring
about vipāka without exception.
On the immoral side, there are five anantariya kamma that WILL bring rebirth in the apāyās at the
end of this life (i.e., when one dies). Those are, killing of mother, father, or an Arahant, injuring a
Buddha, and causing a schism in Saṅgha. See, “WebLink: suttacentral: Parikuppa Sutta (AN 5.129).”
§ On the “moral side”, all stages of Nibbāna can be thought of as “anatariya kamma“. For
example, when one attains the Sotāpanna stage, he/she WILL be born only according to that
“Ariya bhava” or that special kammic energy; thus a rebirth in the lowest four realms WILL
NOT happen.
§ Another interesting point is that when a Bodhisattva cultivates “paramita” to become a Buddha,
what he is doing is to establish a very strong “kamma beeja” over innumerable lives. But at
some point that “kamma beeja” gets fully established and at that point the Bodhisattva gets
“niyata vivarana” (confirmation of attaining the Buddhahood or “Buddha bhava“) from a
Buddha at that time.
The above concepts are looked at from a bit different perspective in, “Memory, Brain, Mind, Nama
Loka, Kamma Bhava, Kamma Vipāka“. Of course, they are consistent!
In the next post, we will discuss how different types of “bhava” are fueled by our actions: “Gati and
Bhava – Many Varieties“, ………..
3.4.2 Gati and Bhava – Many Varieties
Humans have many gathi (gati) or character qualities. These character qualities lead to one’s future
existences (bhava). It is that important.
1. We see that there are three major “bhava” or existence corresponding to the three major levels of
existence that the 31 realms can be divided into: kāma bhava, rūpa bhava, and arūpa bhava.
§ Each of those can be now subdivided into the 31 realms; see, “31 Realms of Existence“.
§ These living beings with kāma bhava live in kāma loka: 4 apāyās, 1 human, and 6 deva realms.
Those with rūpa bhava live in rūpa loka made of 16 rūpāvacara brahma realms. Those with
arūpa bhava live in the 4 arūpāvacara brahma realms in the arūpa loka.
2. The following chart shows the division of the 11 kāma loka realms into the 4 apāyās, the human
realm and 6 deva realms.
Click to open and print the above chart: “WebLink: PDF Download: Bhava and Gathi Chart“.
§ The human realm (or bhava) can now be subdivided into an infinite number of smaller
subdivisions, corresponding to the vast number of varieties that “human gathi” can give rise to:
healthy/unhealthy, rich/poor, happy/angry, etc as shown in the chart. Now we are getting into
personal gathi. Most major ones (rich/poor, healthy/unhealthy, etc) we inherit from the kamma
beeja that was responsible for this birth.
3. Most of the activities of humans are associated with the enjoyment of sensual pleasures in the
kāma loka. Instead of enjoying jhānic pleasures like a few of us (see below), most of us normally
enjoy sensual pleasures associated with the five physical senses.
§ We like to see eye-pleasing views, hear ear-pleasing sounds, taste tongue-pleasing flavors,
smell nose-pleasing odors, and touch body-pleasing objects.
§ All five sense faculties are there only in the kāma loka.
§ Rūpa loka Brahmas do not have noses or tongues, and in arūpa loka there is only the mind.
4. When we are unable to satisfy some sense desires, we as humans tend to do immoral things to
fulfill such sense desires; these are the apuññābhisaṅkhāra associated with strong “kamma patha”
that will generate “bad kamma beeja” to bring about bad consequences or vipāka that could lead to
rebirth in the lowest four realms of kāma loka; see the previous post, “Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma
Beeja, and Mano Loka (Mind Plane)“.
§ For example, a married man, not satisfied with sex with the wife, may have sex with another
woman or even worse, with a child. His tendency to do that may even come from previous lives
or he may have slowly built up that “gathi” over time increasingly engaging in sexual activities
outside the marriage. Either way, such acts are done by animals; they engage in sex without any
discrimination. Thus such activities will generate kamma beeja (or kamma bija) in the animal
bhava; see the above chart.
§ Or, one may be engaging in fishing or hunting both for the pleasure of it or even to make a
living. Either way, it is an “animal gathi“; animals kill for food. Thus one is building up kamma
seeds in animal bhava.
5. If one is very greedy, one may build up kamma beeja appropriate for “hungry ghosts” in the preta
loka. If one is lazy and depends on others for their livelihood one may build up kamma seeds in the
asura bhava; see the chart. We can thus think about how the desire for sense pleasures can lead to the
generation of “bad kamma beeja” in three of the four lowest realms.
§ “Bad kamma beeja” in the lowest realm of niraya (hell) are generated by strong hate or
vyāpāda. As we have discussed before, attachment to sense pleasures (greed) can turn to hate
when someone else gets in the way. Most heinous crimes, including killing of other humans,
are done with such strong hate.
§ As one follows the Path, one will gradually lose animal, preta, asura, and niraya gathi, and one
day will attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Thus birth in the lowest realms of the kāma loka are not just due to kāma rāga, but strong
versions of greed (lobha) and hate (dosa); see, “Sorting out Some Key Pāli Terms (Taṇhā,
Lobha, Dosa, Moha, etc)“.
6. If you think about it for a minute you will realize that most of the abhisaṅkhāra that we do, are
done targeting one or more of those sense-pleasing activities (and they are normally not even
immoral, i.e, but they are still apuññābhisaṅkhāra, but with less kammic energy). But these do not
lead to births in the apāyās.
§ Since we crave those things, we are attached to those things, and according to
“pati+ichcha” (or bonding with liking or desire) leading to “sama + uppāda” (births
accordingly).
§ Thus the more we engage in these activities with zest (an Arahant does some of these too, but
without any cravings), we make kamma beeja in the kāma bhava; we keep strengthening “kāma
gathi“.
7. On the other hand, some people get dissatisfied with the sense pleasures, and cultivate jhānās to
enjoy “mind pleasures” either in the rūpa loka or arūpa loka.
§ Thus, those who have kāma rāga will generate kāma bhava;
§ Rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga (in #2 above) lead respectively to rūpa bhava and arūpa bhava.
§ Thus we can see that how “bhava” are prepared and strengthened by habitually doing things
that one likes according to one’s gathi.
§ Doing things involve kāya saṅkhāra; speaking and thinking about them involve vacī saṅkhāra.
This is why saṅkhāra lead to a “defiled mindset” or viññāṇa, which in turn lead to the
corresponding bhava via those steps in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
8. Thus “bhava” is an energy that we build up ourselves through our actions. Even if someone does
not like to be born a dog, if one keeps doing things that are normally done by dogs, then one is
preparing bhava to be born in the “dog bhava“.
§ One time I heard over the radio in the news that a person was arrested for engaging in sex with
a female dog. Even though he was still in the human realm, for a while he got “born” in the
“dog bhava“. Since that is what he is willingly doing, he is very likely be born a dog at death.
This is a good example for both “pavutti kamma bhava” and “uppatti kamma bhava“.
§ This is also a good example of how one can become morally blind (kāmaccandha nivarana),
when greed or lust rises to a high level.
9. One thing that should have become clear is that even if we do not do any immoral deeds, we are
bound to be reborn in the kāma loka (sense realms of the four apāyās and the human and Deva
realms) as long as we crave sense pleasures. But such sensual cravings, by themselves, do not lead to
birth in the apāyās; birth in the apāyās is due to apuññābhisaṅkhāra or immoral saṅkhāra (see #5
above).
§ As long as we like sense pleasures (and do not realize the dangers in them), we will have “kāma
gathi” and thus we will have “kāma bhava“, i.e., we will keep generating both good and bad
kamma beeja that belong to the kāma bhava.
§ So, what are the dangers in remaining in kāma loka? Even though we may not do any immoral
deeds in this birth (because of our circumstances of being born in a good family, good country,
etc), we are bound to be reborn in a bad environment where we may have to do immoral deeds
to survive; and then we will make kamma beeja suitable for rebirth in the apāyās.
§ In fact, it is very likely that we all already have such bad kamma beeja, because we have no
idea what kind of deeds we have done in the past lives.
10. The mundane way to escape from the kāma loka is to cultivate anariya jhānās (either rūpa jhānās
or arūpa jhānās), and seek rebirth in rūpa or arūpa loka. But the problem is even then we will not be
“really free” from rebirth in the kāma loka in the future. This is because after the kammic energy of
that rūpa bhava or arūpa bhava is worn out, that anariya person will be reborn in kāma loka again.
§ This is why the Buddha admonished the bhikkhus to strive hard to attain at least the Sotāpanna
stage of Nibbāna. He said if we really knew the dangers of rebirth in the kāma loka, we will
make haste like a person who will try to find a way to put out a fire that is engulfing oneself.
§ Some people think these are depressing thoughts. But the facts cannot be avoided by not
thinking about them. In fact, when one realizes the true nature of this world and make some
progress to be free from that predicament, one will start feeling relieved and happy; this is the
nirāmisa sukha of Nibbāna.
11. In general, as we have referred to before, “bhava” means existence somewhere in “this world”. It
is even better to say that “bhava” means the “potential for existence” somewhere “in this world of 31
realms”.
§ When someone cultivates “rūpa loka” jhānās, one generates a kammic energy in a kamma beeja
that can lead to “existence in the rūpa loka“. That means, even while in the human realm,
he/she can get into a jhāna and “effectively live in the rūpa loka“, because that is what a being
(a Brahma) in the rūpa loka experiences; this is called “pavutti kamma bhava” (NOT “kāma
bhava“, which we will discuss below).
§ Furthermore, the more one practices that jhāna, one makes that kamma beeja strong, and when
one dies one will be born in that rūpa loka if died while in the jhāna, because that kamma beeja
will be the one he/she will “upādāna” or grasp at the moment of death; this is “uppatti kamma
bhava“.
§ Thus, that kamma beeja is said to be in “rūpa loka bhava“.
12. Similarly, another person practising arūpa jhānās will be cultivating a kamma beeja in “arūpa
loka bhava“. Furthermore, he/she is likely to display qualities or “gathi” of a “arūpa Brahma” even
while leading a human life.
§ Therefore, when one has a certain bhava, one has the potential to be born in that bhava
for a short time during the current life (called pavutti kamma bhava) or to be born in that
realm at death (uppatti kamma bhava).
13. The strength of a kamma beeja comes from the javana of the citta while one is engaging in the
activity. The worst consequences and hence strong kamma beeja are generated with a mind that
enjoys the evil act. This is why the “somanassa sahagata diṭṭhi sampayutta citta” or the “thought
(act) done with pleasure and with wrong views that arises automatically” is the strongest immoral
citta. Such a thought arises automatically when one has “gathi” compatible with such acts.
§ For example, when one engages in unlawful and immoral sexual activities, the more one enjoys
such acts, and “gets used to such activities” by building up that habit or “gathi“; then the
likelihood of such a thought to arise automatically will be higher. Then one will have higher
and higher levels of kāmaccandha (one of the five nivarana that covers the mind), and thus one
will not think twice before committing such an act. The only way to break out of that vicious
cycle is to contemplate the consequences (possible rebirth in the animal or worse realms),
and make a commitment to stop such activities.
§ The real danger in building up bad habits (gathi) is that one could progressively get into worse
habits. A teenager who starts drinking could then start using drugs; then it could lead to
hanging out with even worse friends and get into drug dealing or even killings. As we saw in
the previous post, “Dhammo ha ve rakkati dhammacāri” or “Dhamma will guide one in the
direction of the type of dhamma one associates with”, can work both ways, moral or immoral.
14. To break away from bad gathi, one needs to make a determination not only to stop such bad
activities but also to build up the opposite good gathi, and start heading in the right direction. We just
have to follow the mundane Eightfold Path and then the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha
Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ Once firmly on the mundane eightfold path, the next steps are to do the correct Ānāpāna
bhāvanā (“6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)“) and the Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā (“Mahā
Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“).
15. Also, it is NOT possible to grasp all this with a mind that is not purified. As I emphasized many
times, what matters in making progress is not the “book knowledge”, but cleansing the mind and
grasping the key Dhamma concepts.
§ Any person, no matter how intelligent or educated, cannot grasp the dangers of the rebirth
process UNTIL the mind is cleansed of defilements to a certain extent by both staying away
from highly immoral acts AND by learning Dhamma.
16. Some people worry about whether they can get rid of certain bad habits they have. They just try
to suppress them quickly by sheer will power. That does not work most of the time. One has to be
patient and just follow the Path, while learning and grasping the key Dhamma concepts.
§ The Buddha gave the following example: When a farmer cultivates his plot, he just needs to
make sure to provide enough water, get rid of weeds, fertilize etc. There is no point in worrying
about “when am I going to get the harvest?”. The crop will grow in time and bring a good
harvest IF the necessary work is done.
§ In the same way, if one follows the Path by leading a moral life and learning Dhamma, one will
be guided in the right direction. And just like the farmer could see that the crop is growing well,
one will be able to experience the progress, but not the end result in a single step.
17. In the previous post, “Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Loka (Mind Plane)“, we
discussed how both nāma gotta and kamma beeja (and bhava) are “located” in the mind plane. Nama
gotta are just records without any embedded energy; when one thinks, speaks, and bodily acts, a trace
of those thoughts, speech, and actions are recorded (like a tape) in the mind plane.
§ On the other hand, the kammic energies associated with those activities are also recorded in the
mind plane as kamma beeja, and those have kammic energies associated with them. Those
kamma beeja are in different “bins” or “categories” called bhava.
3.4.3 Gati to Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control
Introduction
One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the
“nāmarūpa paricceda ñāṇa“.
1. We have discussed the background material in the previous two posts: “Namagotta, Bhava,
Kamma Beeja, and Mano Loka (Mind Plane)” and “Gathi and Bhava – Many Varieties“. Now I want
to bring it all together and show that “bhava” is actually something that we create AND maintain on
our own with the way we think, speak, and act with our ingrained habits (gati).
§ If you have not read the previous two posts, I highly encourage reading them. It is important to
get the basic concepts right, and then to rehash them in different (and yet consistent!) ways, so
that the ideas sink in.
§ We will use those ideas and use the paṭicca samuppāda sequence to trace how we make
“bhava” OURSELVES, which in turn give rise to jāti (births) not only in future lives but also
during this life.
§ There is no one else, or even a “super being”, that can either help or hurt you in the long run.
One’s destiny is up to oneself. The Buddha said, “attā hi attano nātho, ko hi nātho parosiyā” or
“One is indeed one’s own refuge; how can others be refuge to one?”. Even the Buddha could
only teach the way.
What Are Gati?
2. “Gati” is a key word in Buddha Dhamma. There is no perfect English translation but habits,
tendencies, and biases convey similar meaning. Gati has a deeper meaning because sometimes one’s
samsāric gati (habits and tendencies from previous lives) may lie dormant.
§ For example, a teenager may not have a “habit” of drinking, but after a few drinks may get
“hooked” easier than others if he had a corresponding gati from past lives.
§ Also, I get messages from people who never even paid attention to “Buddhism” getting to
samādhi (state of calmness) just reading these posts; that is also a “gati” from past lives. They
are likely to have been exposed to Buddha Dhamma in previous lives.
§ Most of the time we do inappropriate things (immoral abhisaṅkhāra) because we have a gati or
tendency to do so. This is what is embedded in the “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step most of the
time. Our avijjā in such a case is not knowing that we have such gati or knowing about it but
does not know why or how to get rid of it.
§ As I pointed out in “Sutta – Introduction“, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” is just a condensed or
“uddesa” version. We need to analyze it (“niddesa” and “patiniddesa“) to get the idea,
depending on the context.
3. When we (repeatedly) do such abhisaṅkhāra (thoughts, speech, actions), we build-up a viññāṇa for
it. For example, if someone likes to watch porn, the more one does it, the more that “viññāṇa for
watching porn” will grow. It will be in the subconscious ready to “pop up”. In other words, that
“gati” gets more established.
§ Then comes “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“, i.e., it becomes easier to think about clips from
previous views or fantasize about them. Here nāmarūpa are the memories (mental pictures) of
past activities or “blueprints” for future plans. It is important to realize that nāmarūpa for
paṭisandhi viññāṇa will be somewhat different; see, “Akusala-Mula Paṭicca Samuppada“.
4. Now the next step is hard to resist: “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“. Here saḷāyatana means not
all six senses, but the appropriate one(s) for the activity. Here they are cakkayatana (based on the
eye) and manayatana (mind).
§ It is important to realize that “āyatana” does not mean the sense faculty like the eye; it is rather
“using the sense faculty for this purpose”, for doing abhisaṅkhāra (for watching porn and
enjoying it, in this particular example). An Arahant has eyes and can see, but will not use them
as “āyatana” to “acquire ‘san‘”.
§ Then comes, “saḷāyatana paccayā phasso“. Here of course it is not just “phassa” but
“samphassa“, i.e., generate “san” (according to one’s gati) in the process; see, “Difference
between Phassa and Samphassa“.
§ Because it is not just “phassa” but “samphassa“, then one generates feelings: “phassa paccayā
vedanā“. For example, an Arahant watching a porn movie will not generate any joyful feelings,
because that would only involve “phassa” and NOT “samphassa“.
5. Now comes the last few steps. Because of the sukha vedanā (in this particular example), one will
get attached to it: “vedanā paccayā taṅhā“; see, “Taṅhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and
Ignorance“.
§ And then, “taṅhā paccayā upādāna“, i.e., one grasps whole-heartedly because one really enjoys
it, and would like to do it again. “Upādāna” means one likes to keep it close.
§ Thus one makes “bhava” for it; one has plans to do it again, and it is a “reality” or future
existence at some point: “upādāna paccayā bhava“.
Connection Between Gati, Bhava, and Jāti
6. As we can see, all this is going in our minds. The bottom line is that we just keep thinking and
doing things (also called cultivating saṅkhāra) that we have become “attached to” or we have formed
“gati” for. Each time we go through this series of steps we just make that “bhava” grow stronger.
§ Then it becomes easier to be “born in that bhava“, i.e. jāti (pronounced “jāti“). Most people
think “jāti” means rebirth; but it is not restricted to rebirth.
§ Just like one can be born in a certain realm (animal, human, etc) at death, one can be born in the
“drunken state” when one has “bhava to get drunk”. If one makes a “bhava” to watch porn,
then each time one does it, it becomes easier the next time to be “born in that bhava“, i.e., to
watch again.
§ And it is easy to extend this to any other misdeed. If one forms a habit to drink without control
(i.e., “get drunk to the point that one cannot think clearly”), then each time one does it one
makes that bhava stronger; if not controlled, one day one could be an alcoholic. And it does not
stop in this life. If a strong bhava is formed it can affect future births. In a new birth, one is
born to a mother (and to a lesser extent father) with similar gati. Thus an alcoholic in this life is
LIKELY to be born to an alcoholic mother if the next birth is in the human realm.
§ It must be pointed out that “hateful bhava” for certain things or even for a certain person, also
can be carried from life-to-life. There are many mentions in the Tipiṭaka of how Devadatta
clashed with the Buddha (or rather the Bodhisattva) in previous lives.
§ One’s physical body will change (most of the time drastically) from life-to-life, but one’s gati,
āsava, and bhava are carried from life-to-life; of course those keep changing all the time too,
but significant changes happen when one is human with the most ability to change one’s
destiny.
7. Thus “bhava paccayā jāti” applies both in this life and also for future rebirths. This is the
difference between “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda” and that for paṭisandhi to a new life:
“Akusala-Mula Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ As explained in #6 above, one’s future births are due to one’s gati. The realization that one’s
future births are determined by one’s gati — and the ability to figure out the bhava and jāti
(jāthi) according one’s gati — is called “nāmarūpa paricceda ñāṇa” or “nāmarūpa paricceda
ñāṇa“. This basically means “rūpa” are according “nama” (literally, one’s body is according to
one’s thinking).
What Are Āsavās (Cravings)?
8. To make the final connection to Nibbāna, we see that one’s gati are intimately connected to one’s
āsavās (cravings). Just like gati, āsavās are deep-seated and ingrained in one’s lifestream and most
can be traced back numerous lives in the past; see, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Temptations), and
Asava (Cravings)“.
§ While there can be an infinite number of gati, there are four basic categories of āsavās:
diṭṭhāsava, kāmāsava, bhavāsava, avijjāsava; see below.
§ This logical connection is clearly shown in the Sammā Diṭṭhi sutta. It was Ven. Sariputta who
delivered that sutta after being asked by the Buddha to explain “Sammā Diṭṭhi” to other
bhikkhus on one occasion. He went through the steps of the paṭicca samuppāda backwards and
eventually the bhikkhus asked, “Is there a cause for avijjā?”. He explained that indeed āsavās
contribute to avijjā, and vice versa.
§ In fact, as we see in the Abhidhamma section, four of the eight “basic units of matter” in a
suddhāshtaka arise due to avijjā and the other four due to taṅhā (which arise due to āsava).
Avijjā and taṅhā are called “bhava-mūla” for this reason.
9. One way to explain Nibbāna or “complete cooling down” is to say that it is attained by getting rid
of all āsavās. When one follows the Noble Eightfold Path, “āsavakkhaya” is achieved in steps.
§ At the Sotāpanna stage, the first component of āsava or diṭṭhāsava (craving for various diṭṭhis
or wrong worldviews) is removed. This all important component of diṭṭhāsava is solely due to
not knowing the true nature of this world of 31 realms: anicca, dukkha, anatta. Most people
carry certain diṭṭhis all their lives, most even coming from previous lives. The most prevalent
diṭṭhi is the belief that there is no rebirth process.
§ When one truly comprehends that consequences of immoral acts can be much harsher than we
normally believe (birth in the apāyās), that itself removes the causes for rebirth in the apāyās.
Connection to the Four Stages of Nibbāna
10. A Sotāpanna would still have the other three āsavās: kāmāsava (craving for sense pleasures),
bhavāsava (craving for living somewhere in the 31 realms), and avijjāsava (cravings due to not
knowing anicca, dukkha, anatta fully).
§ Kāmāsava is reduced at the Sakadagami stage and is removed at the Anāgāmi stage.
§ Bhavāsava and avijjāsava are removed only at the Arahanthood.
§ Of course, all four āsavās keep getting reduced at each stage of Nibbāna. Thus a Sotāpanna, for
example, would have reduced the other three āsavās to some level.
§ It is also clear that comprehension of anicca, dukkha, anatta gradually increases at each stage
and is complete only at the Arahant stage.
11. It is nice to see the self-consistency, and the fact that one can analyze a given situation in different
ways.
§ One may have a Ph.D. or one may be able to recite the whole of the Tipiṭaka; yet one would not
be even able to get to the Sotāpanna magga without comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta to
some level.
§ Diṭṭhāsava cannot be removed until one is well on the way on the mundane eightfold path,
because one’s mind needs to be cleared of the strongest defilements. As I keep saying, this is
not about “book knowledge”; it is all about cleansing one’s mind.
§ Of course, diṭṭhāsava gives rise to various gati, and thus removal of such gati is the key to
attacking diṭṭhāsava. The foremost is the tendency to “cling to a certain belief” and not even
willing to consider the counter arguments.
§ If one has the diṭṭhi that there is no rebirth, one needs to carefully examine the evidence for and
against.
There are many confusing terms like citta and mano which have been differently interpreted in
different books. In order to clarify these concepts, I am writing a few posts in “Dhamma Concepts”
section under “Mind and Consciousness” starting with: “1. Thoughts (Citta), Consciousness
(Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) – Introduction“.
1. Think about a past event that is still vividly there in your mind. You can visualize the whole
“event” just like watching a movie; you can recall what those people looked like, what they said, etc.
§ Suppoxse a 40-year old recalls an event where she was a 10-year old playing with her mother.
She will recall the event just as it happened 30 years ago: she was young and her mother was 30
years old; it took place in her parents’ house which does not even exist now. But in the
“playback” that exact same time sequence is played back with the 10-year old playing with her
30-year old mother in the same house that they lived in. It is not just a “summary” of what
happened, rather an exact playback showing her young mother’s features at that time, what she
said, etc.
§ Recently, it has been reported that some individuals have an astounding capability to instantly
recall past events (during this life) in vivid detail; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory
Records (HSAM)“.
2. Most scientists and philosophers believe that the memories are kept in the brain. Is this a realistic
picture? They do not have any evidence to back this claim.
§ How can all those details be “stored” in a biological membrane, ready to be retrieved at a
moment’s notice? No one has explained a plausible mechanism yet.
3. Whatever we do with body, speech, and mind, a “record” (nama gotta) gets established (“bihiwelā
pihitanava” in Sinhala) in the kamma bhava: In the word “bhava”, “bha” means “appear and gets
established”; thus the act we did, i.e., kamma, gets recorded in the kamma bhava exactly the same
way it happened. We cannot “see” bhava but we can see the results of bhava as “jathi”.
§ Not only potent kamma, but ALL memories are stored intact in the nama loka. Basically,
the thought stream is recorded continuously like a movie recording and thus can be “played
back”; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ Thus while the “fruits of kamma” are embedded in kamma beeja (seeds) in the nama loka as
kamma bhava, the movie like sequence is recorded in the nama loka as nama gotta.
§ Therefore, while kamma seeds in the kamma bhava can bring their results in the future, the
nama gotta are just records without substance: see, “Difference Between Dhamma and
Saṅkhāra (Sankhata)“. Thus unlike anything else in this world (saṅkhāra or saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala)), nama gotta are PERMANENT.
§ This is why the Buddha Gotama could recall the exact scene that happened billions of years
ago, when he received the first confirmation (“niyata vivarana“) of his future Buddhahood by
the Buddha Deepankara. At that time he was an ascetic by the name of Sumedha and the
Buddha Gotama described the whole event that took place in detail; see, WebLink: WIKI:
Dīpankara Buddha.
§ In the same way, the kamma beeja stored in the nama loka are instantly activated when proper
conditions are realized; see, “Anantara and Samanatara Paccaya”. However, unlike nama gotta,
kamma seeds fade away with time unless brought to bear fruit under right conditions.
4. Thus, memories (whatever the portion that is remembered) are played back in a “movie-like”
manner, like in a dream. It is like a segment of a “movie recording”. It is not just a “gist” or a
summary; we can recall the whole “sequence of events” like in a movie.
§ This is why when someone describes an event by memory he/she always tends to tell the story
sequentially: The person listening may not want to hear the whole story and could become
impatient waiting for the narrator to “get to the point”, but for the narrator recalling the event, it
is easier to go sequentially as the event is “played back” in his/her mind.
5. We cannot say where that memory is “located”, because they are not stored in the “physical space”
or the “material world”; they are in the “nama loka” or “mental world”. In contrast what we
experience through our five senses is the “rūpa loka” or the “material world” that consists of 31
realms.
§ This is also why scientists will not be able to describe the mind in terms of matter; see, “The
Double Slit Experiment – Correlation between Mind and Matter?“. Mind and matter belong to
two distinct domains.
§ As I will clarify in detail in the future, this is related to the fact that there are six fundamental
entities (six dhatus): patavi (hardness), āpo (cohesiveness), tejo (vitality), vāyo (motion), akasa
(space), and viññāṇa (consciousness). The viññāṇa dhatu is associated with the “nama loka”
and the other five dhatus are associated with the “rūpa loka” or the “material world”. But we
don’t need to worry about that right now. You will see other pieces falling into place in a “big
jigsaw puzzle” as all these seemingly unrelated aspects come together to form a cohesive,
complete picture of the “wider world”.
§ This could be related to the possibility of higher “curled up” dimensions that is being discussed
in String Theory in physics; see, “What Happens in Other Dimensions?”.
6. We can normally access our own “information” from this life but some people, especially some
young children, have the ability to recall nama gotta from past lives. Those who have abhiññā
powers can access such “information” or “nama gotta” of other people as well; however, even they
cannot read another’s “thoughts” or “kamma beeja” or “kamma bhava“.
§ We can retrieve this memory by thinking about it. There is a mechanism for that memory to be
retrieved; the mind initiates the process, but the brain acts as the “receiver” for the incoming
information.
§ When we think about something that happened in the past, the mind sends mind rays out and
they bounce off that specific target in the “nama loka” and the memory is reflected back. That
retrieval process does not change the memory record, and the record stays intact. Thus one can
go back and recall it again.
§ When the retrieved information comes back, that signal is processed by the brain. Our whole
body is prepared by the kamma seed that led to this human existence to limit/facilitate certain
capabilities; thus what we can actually remember depends on the status of our brain. Our
human bodies are generally setup (by kamma vipāka) to be able to retrieve only the strong
memories from the early days of this life and cannot access memories of previous lives. But
few people can, and so can some children. Furthermore, if the relevant parts of the brain gets
damaged, then the retrieval capability may be lost.
§ Some beings in preta loka can remember past lives to impart more suffering on them.
They can remember the bad deeds done by them that led to the birth in the preta world, and
how long they will have to suffer to “pay back the debt”.
7. How much of that memory one actually recalls depends on two things: the health of the brain and
the purity of the mind.
§ If the brain is not functioning well, only bits and pieces of the memory will be actually
experienced. When people get old, the brain’s efficiency goes down and thus memory will not
work well. The brain is like a playback device and if it is defective, the display will be blurry or
at worst no display will result.
8. Secondly, even a person with a healthy brain, may not be able to recall memories if the mind is
“covered” by the five hindrances (panca nivarana); see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five
Hindrances“.
§ When there is kamachanda or vyāpāda, the mind is too much focused on those objects of
thought (arammana). When there is thina middha, the mind is now “stuck” lazily at something
(sleepy or just distracted), and will not retrieve the memory. With uddhacca kukkucca, the mind
is normally “intoxicated” with power, money, beauty etc is stuck at a “low level”. With
vicikicchā (which is due to micchā diṭṭhi or not knowing the true characteristics anicca, dukkha,
anatta), one engages in inappropriate acts and thus the mind is not “sharp”.
§ Thus, any, some, or all of these five factors can affect the memory of even a person with a
healthy brain. When we purify our minds of the panca nivarana, its ability to pinpoint a given
“memory location” is improved.
§ Furthermore, when the mind is purified, that can make one’s brain to function better by
changing the conditions for better kamma vipāka to come to fruition; see, “Anantara and
Samanatara Paccaya”. This “mind effect” on the brain and the body in general is being re-
discovered by scientists; see, for example, “The Biology of Belief” by Bruce H. Lipton.
9. Most scientists and philosophers believe that our memories are stored in our brains. There are key
problems with that assumption:
§ If that is the case, then the “state of the mind” should not be a factor in recalling a memory,
because then it is like retrieving a sound track from a disc; the playback should be good as long
as the “playing device” (i.e., the brain) is in good condition.
§ It is astounding how much one can recall from the memory. And it comes out like a video clip;
we can visualize and even recall the conversations that took place a long time ago in case of
poignant memories. Can all those details be “stored” in a biological membrane?
§ Even if it is possible to encode all that information (exact features of the 10-year old child and
her 30-year old mother, what they spoke at that time in the same tone, etc. in the hypothetical
example of #1 above), how can it be recalled instantaneously?
10. Here is an article which discusses these unresolved scientific issues: WebLink: VIEWZONE: Are
your memories really in your brain?
§ Here is a good site if you need to dig in deeper: WebLink: HUMAN-MEMORY: MEMORY
STORAGE
There is much confusion about the terms “bhava” and “jāti”. But that does not need to be the case.
Here we will clarify these two important terms in the paṭicca samuppāda (PS) cycles.
§ By the way, jāti is pronounced “jāthi” with “th” sound as in “three”.
1. In both Pāli and Sinhala, jāti means birth; bhava means “තිබෙන බව” in Sinhala, or “existence”.
§ When one gets a “human existence” or a human bhava, that can last thousand of years. Within
that time, one can be born (jāti) with a physical human body many times.
§ When one gets a human existence at a cuti-paṭisandhi moment, what is formed first is a “mental
body” with a mind-base (hadaya vatthu), and a set of pasāda rūpa. That “mental body” is
called a gandhabba.
§ When the gandhabba comes out either at death of the physical body or in an “out-of-body
experience” (OBE), the physical body becomes inert; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“.
§ Details are available in two subsections: “Mental Body – Gandhabba” and “Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya)“.
2. In rebirth stories, there is always a “time gap” between successive human births (jāti). They are
separated by many years or at least few years. In between those successive lives, that lifestream lives
as a gandhabba, without a physical body.
§ In most rebirth stories, the previous human life was terminated unexpectedly, like in an
accident or a killing. Therefore, the kammic energy for the human bhava had not been
exhausted, and the gandhabba just came out of the dead body and waited for another womb to
enter.
§ Furthermore, the Buddha has described how difficult it is to get a human existence; see, “How
the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“. If “bhava” is taken to be
“birth”, then all those rebirth stories cannot be true.
3. From the WebLink: suttacentral: Ratana Sutta; “..Na te bhavaṃ aṭṭhamamādiyanti“, means, “(A
Sotāpanna) will not be born in an eighth bhava“. But there could be many rebirths within those
seven bhava.
§ For example, King Bimbisāra who was a Sotāpanna died and was to have 14 rebirths; see,
“WebLink: suttacentral: Janavasabha Sutta (DN 18)“.
4. Also, “bha” means “establish”. When we have strong feelings about something, say we like
something and thoughts “wheel around” in our mind about how to get it, that is very potent
abhisaṅkhāra; this mental power gets established in the “kamma bhava” as a kamma beeja (seed).
§ This is also why it is easy to make kamma beeja or kamma bhava based on our gati
(habits/character). Each person likes certain kinds of things. So, we keeping strengthening
existing kamma beeja/kamma bhava, which, if strong enough, can lead to a rebirth with such
“gati” or “bhava“, because that is what is “gets attached to” or ‘likely to grasp” or “upādāna“.
5. Let us take some examples.
§ An alcoholic drinks habitually, and thus people refer to him as a drunkard. He has a drinking
habit (gati) and a craving (āsava) for it.
§ But he is not in a state of intoxication all the time, only when he is drunk, i.e., only when he is
born in that “jāti“. The mindset of liking for a state of intoxication is the “bhava”
corresponding to his “gati” (habit); he has that gati or bhava and thus he can be “born” (jāti) in
that state easily.
§ This is the “bhava paccayā jāti” step in paṭicca samuppāda (PS) cycles that operates during
this life, leading him to get drunk many, many times.
6. On the other hand, someone who does not like to drink may even have an aversion for drinking
alcohol. That person does not have “gati” or “bhava” for intoxication and thus it is unlikely that he
will be “born” in that state. Therefore, it is unlikely that he will get drunk, or “be born” in that
condition. The “bhava paccayā jāti” step in the PS cycle does not happen here, because the condition
or the cause, bhava, is not there.
§ A person who has a really bad temper has a “gati” or “bhava” for that, and thus may be born in
that, i.e., may flare up with the slightest provocation. Another may have a less strong “bhava“,
and a third person who is very calm may have only a trace of that “bhava“. The stronger the
“bhava“, the easier it is to be born (jāti) in that “bhava“.
§ Similarly, a person who may have excess greed will have a “gati” or “bhava” for that. And such
a “greedy bhava” may have focused areas: some are greedy for food, some for power, some for
fame, money, etc.
7. Bhava is intimately connected to gati (habits/character). One “builds up” a given bhava by
engaging activities that cultivates that bhava; this happens via repeated paṭicca samuppāda cycles
during a given life.
§ An alcoholic does this by associating with friends who are alcoholics, frequenting places where
they all hang out, etc. This is discussed in the “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ People with similar habits (“gati“) tend to “hang together” (see, “The Law of Attraction, Habits
(Gati), and Cravings (Āsavas)“, which accelerates that whole process.
8. The above examples describe how “pavutti kamma bhava” are made, i.e., how one prepares a
certain bhava in this life via engaging in relevant saṅkhāra or kamma repeatedly.
§ An alcoholic does this via mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra: such thoughts (mano saṅkhāra)
come to his mind often. Then he consciously thinks about such activities and speaks about them
(vacī saṅkhāra), i.e., engages in vitakka and vicāra that are focused on drinking activities). Of
course, he will also physically engage in such activities with kāya saṅkhāra.
§ The more he does those, the stronger the “drinking bhava” or “drinking habit” becomes.
§ Someone who has cultivated such a kamma bhava for drinking can be easily born in that state
(getting drunk) many times DURING a life time.
9. Let us take another example. A child may enjoy torturing a cat or a dog. If this habit is not stopped,
he may start gaining pleasure by torturing humans too.
§ The “pati+ichcha sama+uppāda” cycle will take him to an extreme if not disrupted early
enough. He will build a habit for doing it (i.e. born in that state) many times during the same
lifetime.
§ Those two are examples of the pavutti bhava described in the “Akusala-Mūla Pavutti (or
Pravutti) Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
10. Such kamma bhava can get strong enough to become “uppatti bhava“, leading to rebirth in a
“good existence” (deva, brahma) or a “bad existence” (animal, peta, etc).
§This is the real danger. At the dying moment one will be drawn (“upādāna“) to an environment
that is compatible with ones prominent habits (gati) or bhava.
§ Because one got attached willingly (i.e., upādāna), a similar bhava will result: i.e., pati+ichcha
leading to sama+uppada or paṭicca samuppāda. This is the “upādana paccayā bhava” step.
§ Thus an alcoholic (when reborn within the same human bhava) is prone to be born to family
where the father or mother (or both) are alcoholics. That is the most suitable environment for
his upādāna and bhava.
§ One who enjoys torturing animals/humans may be born in niraya (hell) where there is incessant
torture. Depending on the nature of the bhava one could be born there to impart torture on
others or to be subjected to torture.
11. On the other hand, one who has benevolent qualities of a deva (i.e., deva bhava) could acquire
“deva bhava” and be born a deva; one who has cultivated compassion for other beings (i.e., brahma
bhava) may acquire “brahma bhava” and be born a brahma.
§ Similarly, one who has developed disgraceful qualities of a dog may be acquire a “dog bhava“,
and be born repeatedly a dog until that kammic energy is spent.
§ It is the universal principle of “pati+ichcha sama+uppāda” working to yield an existence that
is similar to the actions that one willingly engaged in; see, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda”
and “Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
12. A kamma beeja (seed) is also related to bhava; when one develops a habit (gati) by keep doing
things related to it, that bhava or the kamma beeja gets stronger. It leads to “bhava paccayā jāti”
under suitable conditions many times during this life itself.
§ In the case of the person who developed a bhava for torturing other living beings may have that
kamma seed being the one selected for next bhava upon death from a bhava that had exhausted
all its kammic energy.
§ In that case, he may be born in the niraya repeatedly (many jāti) until the kammic energy for
that kamma bhava is spent. This is an example of an uppatti kamma bhava.
13. Thus it becomes clear that one needs to look at the root cause for having certain habits or
behavior patterns.
§ We can go backwards in the PS to find the causes. To be born in a drunken state, one needs to
have a bhava of an alcoholic.
§ That bhava was conditioned via upādāna (willing and forceful embracing), which in turn was
due to taṇhā (getting attached to drinking), which was due to feeling (i.e., he got to like the
“drunk” feeling, the state of intoxication), which was due to (san)phassa or contact, saḷāyatana
(using the six senses inappropriately), nāmarūpa (associated visuals of names and activities),
saṅkhāra (kaya, vacī, and mano saṅkhāra for that activity), and of course the starting point of
avijjā (ignorance of the consequences).
14. By examining these steps, we can see that the whole cycle can be stopped primarily at two places.
§ By contemplating on the adverse consequences of drinking, he could remove ignorance (avijjā),
and make a firm decision to stop.
§ If he is mindful, whenever a thought about drinking comes to the mind, he can stop “wheeling
around” (stopping mano/vacī saṅkhāra) and thus stopping multiple PS cycles; see, “Difference
Between Taṇhā and Upādāna“.
15. If one is able to get rid of that drinking habit (gati), one would have removed that bhava. Then it
is unlikely that one will be born (jāti) in that intoxicated state.
§ The “trigger level” needed to generate a birth will be higher if the bhava (or habit) is not strong.
Someone who has not had an alcoholic drink may be reluctant to have one.
§ When one has a strong habit for drinking (strong bhava), all needed could be the sight of a
bottle of alcohol.
16. All above is valid for “good bhava” or “good habits” too. In order to cultivate that bhava, one
needs to be engaged in as many PS cycles as possible. The more the cycle gets repeated, the stronger
each step becomes (the neural connections in the brain for that habit will strengthen, in term of
modern science; see, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific View“).
§ It is easy to see from the above discussion why it is important to instill good habits in children
and also to break any bad habits that they start developing. It is much more easier to stop
forming a bhava or habit (gati) at early stages; once the habit takes hold, it becomes harder to
remove. And that is true for adults too.
Also see, “How Character (Gati) Leads to Bhava and Jāti“, …….
3.4.6 Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna
Introduction
1. The difference between taṇhā and upādāna is subtle, and it is critical to understand that difference.
It is the key to understanding how one can get rid of bad gati and also cultivate good gati. That is the
way to Nibbāna.
§ That is also critically important to understand the basic idea behind the Satipaṭṭhāna (and
Ānāpāna) bhāvanā.
2. Satipaṭṭhāna (and Ānāpāna) bhāvanā are about being mindful and catching new BAD thoughts
that arise in one’s mind. One should stop such thoughts immediately. If the thought is a good one (say
about a Dhamma concept), then one should stay on it.
§ The English word “thought” is too simplified. It includes vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and
viññāṇa, each of which is complex; see, “Mental Aggregates” and “Viññāṇa – What It Really
Means.”
§ Saṅkhāra is especially crucial since kammic energy for future vipāka is created by the three
types of saṅkhāra: mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, and kāya saṅkhāra; see, “Saṅkhāra – What
It Really Means.”
§ Therefore, we will stay with those Pāli words.
6. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Na Santi Sutta (SN 1.34),” the Buddha defined “kāma” to be this
“daydreaming” or “generating more and more thoughts about it”: “Na te kāmā yāni citrāni
loke, Saṅkapparāgo purisassa kāmo..”.
Translated: “World’s pretty things are not kāma, a person creates his/her kāma by thinking about
it (rāga sankalpanā)..”.
11. For example, one can break the addiction to drugs in a shorter time (say a month) if he has the
discipline to stop taking it AND also stop thinking about it.
§ If he stops taking the drug but goes on enjoying thinking about it (vacī saṅkhāra), it will not
work. He may go on without using drugs for months and months, but one day, he may lose the
resolve and go back to drugs.
§ That happens to a lot of people addicted to different things like alcohol, smoking, or even
overeating. They may temporarily stop those activities, but months later they break it. That is
because they had not stopped generating vacī saṅkhāra or engaging in upādāna for that
actively.
For a pdf file for printing: “WebLink: PDF File: Taṇhā and Upādāna.”
§ Therefore, by being mindful and acting with paññā (wisdom, which is vijjā or the opposite of
avijjā), one can reduce upādāna and gradually get rid of bad gati.
§ We can also see that, in addition to contributing to bad gati, it is those vacī saṅkhāra that
make one grasp a new “bad bhava” at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ In another extreme example, a person who is trying to control anger may start talking back to
someone who just said something harsh. But as soon as one realizes that one is going back to
the old habit, one can even stop in the mid-sentence.
14. When we start controlling the CRITICAL upādāna step, our gati will slowly change. Then, with
time, the first step of “taṇhā” will reduce, and eventually go away.
§ That is the basis of Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna meditations.
§ Nowadays, when I get up, the first thing that comes to my mind is a Dhamma concept or a
problem that I had been thinking about the previous day.
Summary
18. Finally, there are two things one must do to make progress on the Path.
§ One is to reduce avijjā by learning Dhamma.
§ The other is to reduce upādāna by controlling vacī saṅkhāra as we discussed above.
§ If we do both, they will help each other, and make the progress much faster.
November 14, 2018; revised November 16, 2018 (#3 and #6)
1. While akusala kamma are “immoral deeds”, pāpa kamma are “highly immoral deeds”. However,
there is a huge difference.
§ In some English translations that I have seen, both pāpa kamma and akusala kamma are
translated as, “bad deeds”.
§ It is critical to understand that if one has not removed the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi, it is
POSSIBLE for one to commit pāpa kamma.
2. As we have discussed before, moha is the stronger version of avijjā. If one has moha, then one also
has lobha and dosa, which are stronger versions of rāga (kāma rāga, rūpa rāga, arūpa rāga) and
paṭigha; see, “Lobha, Rāga and Kāmaccanda, Kāmarāga” and “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Rāga,
Patigha, Avijjā“.
§ We know that akusal-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles start with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“,
and NOT “moha paccayā saṅkhāra“.
§ Before one starts focusing on understanding Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles, one must have reduced
moha to avijjā level.
3. Paṭicca Samuppāda (starting with avijjā) describes processes that lead to births in the sugati or
“good realms” (human realm and above), as well as births in dugati or “bad realms” or apāyās (the
four lowest realms).
§ One does need to apply Paṭicca Samuppāda to determine births done with pāpa kamma, but it
is not even necessary: they INVARIABLY lead to births in the apāyās.
§ Put it in another way, pāpa kamma done with those highly potent apuñña abhisaṅkhāra
ALWAYS lead to births in the apāyās.
§ The bottom line is that one is capable of doing pāpa kamma (does not mean one will always
do) as long as one has one or more the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. When one gets rid of all those
micchā diṭṭhi, one does not have moha anymore; it is reduced to avijjā.
Sutta Descriptions – What Are Pāpa Kamma?
4. Pāpa kamma are described in several suttas, but let us focus on the WebLink: suttacentral:
Pathama Pāpadhamma Sutta (AN 4.207). I will just provide the translation to save space.
“Bhikkhus, who is a highly immoral person (pāpo)? One who is engaged in the destruction of life
or initiates, encourages, praises, helps destruction of life (in a habitual way) is a highly immoral
person destined to be born in the apāyās…”.
§ The rest of the sutta lists six MORE deeds in the same way: Taking what is not given, sexual
misconduct, immoral speech, Intoxication (drinking, taking drugs, etc), and micchā diṭṭhi.
§ For example, the full description of the last one is: One who has micchā diṭṭhi or initiates,
encourages, praises, encourages others to have such views (in a habitual way).
§ It is important to note that just one action does not make one a “pāpo” or a “highly immoral
person”. There is a second related sutta: “WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiya Pāpadhamma Sutta
(AN 4.208).”
(By the way, I just realized that I have been writing micchā diṭṭhi as micchā diṭṭhi in many posts. I
will try to make the correction in existing posts. It is not a big error, but it is always good to follow
the Tipiṭaka words as they are written).
5. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Duccarita Vipāka Sutta (AN 8.40)” is another sutta that state eight
immoral actions that could make one born in the apāyās. “Duccarita” means “highly immoral
character” so a “duccarita puggala” means the same as “pāpo” or “a highly immoral person”.
Here is the translation of that sutta.
(1) “Bhikkhus, the destruction of life, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive
to rebirths in hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a
human after paying off most of the vipāka, one will also have a short life span.
(2) “Taking what is not given, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive to
rebirths in hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a human
after paying off most of the vipāka, one is likely to face loss of wealth.
(3) “Sexual misconduct, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive to rebirths
in hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a human after
paying off most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed to enmity and rivalry.
(4) “False speech (per Dhamma, not strictly lying), repeatedly pursued, developed, and
cultivated, is conducive to rebirths in hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts;
when one is born as a human after paying off most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed to false
accusations.
(5) “Divisive speech, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive to rebirths in
hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a human after
paying off most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed to being separated from one’s loved ones.
(6) “Harsh speech, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive to rebirths in hell,
to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a human after paying off
most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed to disagreeable sounds.
(7) “Idle chatter, repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is conducive to rebirths in hell,
to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is born as a human after paying off
most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed to others distrusting one’s words.
(8) “Intoxication (drinking, taking drugs, etc), repeatedly pursued, developed, and cultivated, is
conducive to rebirths in hell, to the animal realm, and to the sphere of hungry ghosts; when one is
born as a human after paying off most of the vipāka, one will also be exposed mental problems.”
§ There are many more suttas that discuss pāpa kamma and their consequences being rebirth in
the apāyās, for example, AN 10.211 through AN 10. 220.
6. There is also a set of suttas (AN 10.211 through AN 10. 220) that state that dasa akusala (taking a
life, stealing, abusing sense pleasures, speaking untruth, slandering, harsh speech, gossiping, greed,
ill-will, wrong views or micchā diṭṭhi) lead to rebirth in the apāyās.
§ Therefore, pāpa kamma are the same as dasa akusala done with micchā diṭṭhi. That means
having micchā diṭṭhi makes one’s mind “covered”, i.e., one has moha.
§ It is important to note that some of dasa akusala can be done without micchā diṭṭhi, and those
are done with just avijjā.
Description of Pāpa Kamma
7. Those immoral actions in #4 through #6 above are basically all pāpa kamma.
§ It is important to note the emphasize on the phrase, ” repeatedly pursued, developed, and
cultivated”.
§ For example, those who habitually go fishing and hunting would belong to this category. Also
see #14 below.
§ Another way to say that is to say “cultivating (abhi)saṅkhāra“. One does such an action
because it becomes one’s gati, i.e., it becomes a habit and it contributes to one’s character.
§ These are essentially the same as the descriptions in #4 above.
8. I want to emphasize that all of the following four actions contribute in each of the above listed
immoral actions in #4 through #6 above (If done on a regular basis):
§ Doing it.
§ Assisting another person to do it.
§ Ordering (or instructing) another person to do it.
§ Praising someone who is doing it.
9. When one has moha, one is capable of doing pāpa kamma without any remorse. That means
one is not even close to being released from the apāyās.
§ This is a very simple fact that can save a lot of wasted time for many people. It is
absolutely a waste of time to even try to understand Paṭicca Samuppāda if one still has any of
the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi, some of which are commonly held; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi,
Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ I know I am going to make many people unhappy by making these statements. But it is better to
learn the truth as soon as possible. We all have been trapped in this suffering-filled rebirth
process for an unimaginable time, simply because we have not been able to understand
this key point.
13. These days, many people just start by trying to understand deep suttas that REQUIRE an
understanding of Paṭicca Samuppāda and Tilakkhaṇa.
§ However, many of them (including many bhikkhus) do not believe in rebirth, or that the
concepts of para loka and gandhabba are valid. They erroneously believe that gandhabba is a
Mahayāna concept, but neither them or Mahāyānists understand what is meant by
antarabhava; see, “Mental Body – Gandhabba“.
§ Getting to the Sotāpanna stage CANNOT be done by just reading a few posts. One has to make
a real effort to understand the key concepts involved, and live a moral life.
14. Making progress on the Path requires working on two fronts:
§ One needs to understand the key basic concepts in Buddha Dhamma like dasa akusala and
micchā diṭṭhi, before tackling Tilakkhaṇa and Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ One needs to live a moral life and “the level of morality” will automatically increase as one’s
understanding gets deeper and deeper.
§ Therefore, those two aspects go hand-in-hand. One cannot just focus on one aspect. Both are
necessary.
15. It is also a good idea to understand some key details of how laws of kamma work.
§ Just because one kills some insects when doing yard work does not contribute significantly at
all. The intention plays a key role as discussed in: “What is Intention in Kamma?“.
§ Furthermore, killing a human is much more significant than killing many, many animals
because a human life is much more difficult to get; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different
Kamma“.
3.5 Sorting out Some Key Pali Terms (Taṇhā, Lobha, Dosa, Moha, etc)
Kāma taṇhā, bhava taṇhā, vibhava taṇhā are three key Pāli words that are commonly misunderstood.
1. Tanhā is “getting attached to things in this world” via greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ The word taṇhā comes from “thán” + “hā”, where “thán” rhymes like in “thatch” and means “a
place; “hā” means getting attached or fused; see, “Taṇhā – How we Attach via Greed, Hate, and
Ignorance“. Note that “tan” in taṇhā is pronounced like in “thunder”.
2. We attach to things because of the ignorance that they can provide lasting happiness; this
attachment first manifests in greed. But when someone or something gets in the way, we generate
hate; now we attach to another thing via hate.
§ For example, a teenager wants to get a car and generates greed; he is bound to that idea of
getting a car. If a parent refuses, then he may generate anger and even hate towards the parent.
Now he is bound in two places.
3. In kāma loka, where all five physical sense faculties are present. Getting attach to anything that is
contacted via the five senses is kāma taṇhā. However, attachment arising from the desire to enjoy
taste, smell, and body touch are exclusively restricted to the kāma loka.
§ In the rūpa lokas, taṇhā arise only due to eye and ear. Thus an Anāgāmī, who will be born in a
rūpa loka has some rūpa taṇhā and sadda taṇhā because he/she may like to see a Buddha statue
or listen to a discourse.
4. Bhava taṇhā arises from attachment to “any existence”. Thus bhava taṇhā is present in kāma loka,
rūpa loka, and arūpa loka, i.e., all 31 realms.
§ Even in the kāma loka there may be people who do not enjoy the “kāma” or sense pleasures;
but they still want to live a quiet, peaceful life. They mostly have bhava taṇhā. They may like
to be in a secluded place cultivating jhāna; that is their desired “bhava”. If they develop jhānas,
they will be born in rūpa loka or arūpa loka due to their new “gathi”.
§ There are other subtle forms of “bhava” too. Some like to become famous, earn a title, to hold a
certain office or a responsibility, etc. These are not associated with sensual pleasures and are
also due to bhava taṇhā.
5. Vibhava taṇhā arises from the wrong view of materialism (ucceda diṭṭhi in the time of the Buddha;
ucceda pronounced “uchchêda”). One believes that at death one ceases to exist, i.e., one believes that
the mind is a byproduct of the body (brain), and thus when the body dies, that is the end of story.
Thus one believes that one needs to just enjoy the pleasures of this life before dying. They obviously
have kāma taṇhā as well.
§ It is easy to have vibhava taṇhā, especially when one has not heard about the Buddha’s
message about a wider and more complex world with 31 realms and a rebirth process. Since our
normal human senses cannot access such “hidden” aspects of this world, one just believes what
one sees. It takes an effort to verify that indeed the wider world view is needed to EXPLAIN all
that we can experience; see, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek “Good Rebirths”“.
§ Many immoral acts are done with ucceda diṭṭhi (or materialism or nihilism) because one
believes that everything in this world is for one’s enjoyment. Even though it is obvious that
animals cry with pain when being killed, that is not of any consequences in their minds. The
logic is that If this birth is the one and the last, there is no possibility that one could face the
same fate in the future.
§ The connection of ucceda (or uccheda) diṭṭhi to vibhava taṇhā is made in Section 3.2.4
Ucchedavada in the WebLink: Suttacentral: Brahmajala Sutta.
§ The fact that there is a difference between cutting vegetables and killing animals for food
should be given some contemplation. Obviously, the animal is feeling the pain. Then how is an
animal different from us? They are different only at the intellectual level; but we have a higher
intellectual level only because we have been fortunate to get this temporary human life of 100
years or so, because of a previous good deed.
§ In the next birth we could be born an animal; it depends on the types of kamma that we have
accumulated. It takes time to go through such an analysis, and to convince oneself of the ability
of the Buddha Dhamma to provide “good explanations”, and many just do not take the needed
time to do such an investigation.
6. Let us see how each type of taṇhā is removed as one progresses on the Path.
§ When one just starts on the Path and makes an effort to understand the message of the Buddha,
one starts losing all three types of taṇhā gradually. With time one can feel that change and the
resulting nirāmisa sukha that comes from it. It may take a few days, months, or even a year to
feel a significant change depending on the individual.
§ Vibhava taṇhā is removed at Sotāpanna stage, since only someone with micchā diṭṭhi can have
vibhava taṇhā. It is important to realize that one has vibhava taṇhā if one does not believe in
the rebirth process.
§ Kāma taṇhā leads to various levels of attachment that are removed step-by-step in the four
stages of Nibbāna. Kamaccanda is removed at the Sotāpanna stage; Kāma rāga is reduced at
the Sakadāgāmī stage and is removed at the Anāgāmī stage. This process is discussed in the
next post, “Lobha, Raga and Kamaccanda, Kamaraga“.
§ As long as one is reborn anywhere in the 31 realms, one has bhava taṇhā. Thus, bhava taṇhā is
completely eliminated only at the Arahant stage.
7. Finally, two relevant points:
§ It is important to note that these three “tendencies to bind” (kāma taṇhā, bhava taṇhā, vibhava
taṇhā) arise due to kāmasava, bhavāsava, and vibhavāsava . Tanhā arise due to asāva: One
gets “attached” because one has deeply- embedded cravings.
§ Sometimes vibhavasava is split into two: ditthasava (diṭṭhi āsava) and avijjasava (avijjā
āsava). This is because vibhavasava arises due to wrong views and ignorance.
Next, “Lobha, Raga and Kamaccanda, Kamaraga“, …….
In the previous post, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways,” we discussed how feelings arise in two
ways, and one type of feelings occur due to our own volition, i.e., due to taṇhā.
What is Taṇhā?
1. In the post, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Introduction,” we discussed the origin of the term “taṇhā.” It
means getting fused or strongly attached. The word taṇhā comes from “thán” meaning “place” +
“hā” meaning getting fused/welded or attached (හා වීම in Sinhala). Note that “tan” in taṇhā
pronounced like in “thunder.”
§ Here we will see how that happens according to the natural process of Paṭicca Samuppāda.
That is what the Buddha called “sabba” or ALL. Our whole world is what we experience with our
six senses. Take a moment and contemplate this. Is there anything else “in this world” other than
those six listed above?
3. It is essential to realize that these INITIAL sense inputs come to us via kamma vipāka. Then based
on whether we have āsava/anusaya (or corresponding gati or habits), WE MAY act with avijjā
to pursue that sensory input.
§ Our greedy, hateful, or ignorant thoughts arise when we make contact with the outside world
with one or more of these six senses. Kamma vipāka lead to sensory inputs. But not all sense
inputs lead to acting with avijjā. (Please take time to think and contemplate on these ideas
as you go along. It is critical to get these ideas to proceed further).
§ That critical fact becomes apparent when we do not think along the lines of an “established
self” or “no-self.” There is no “person” who has avijjā all the time. Avijjā arises due to
āsava/anusaya depending on the sense input; see, “‘Self’ and ‘no-self’: A Simple Analysis.”
How Do We Get Attached?
4. How we get “bonded” to something that we experience? Let us take, for example, someone
listening to a new song. In this case, the sound (sadda) impinging on the ear (sota) leads to sound
consciousness. Several things happen in a fraction of a second. This VERY FAST sequence is:
(i). “Sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ“, where, sota is ear; sadde is sound (song),
uppajjati means gives rise to, sota viññāna is hearing consciousness, and paṭicca here means just the
fact that sound makes contact with the ears, and NOT “pati + icca” or “willingly getting bonded.
Thus,
§ “Due to the sound of the song received by the ear, gives rise to sound consciousness.”
§ The mind does not generate any saṅkhāra in assessing that sound. It just RECEIVES the sound
signal.
We need to have a liking for something to be interested in it. Every day, we see a million pictures,
sounds, etc., but we remember only a selected number, and these are the ones that lead to taṇhā.
“Getting interested” step is next:
(ii). “Tinnan san gati phasso“;
Here, we need to spend a bit of time explaining the terms: “san” means defilements or fuel for
sansāric journey (see, “What is “San”?“), and “gati” (pronounced “gathi”)are sansāric habits (see,
“Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“); thus “san gati” means sansāric habits; “phassa” means contact, and
“tinnan” (pronounced “thinnan”) means three. Please go back and read those two links if you do not
remember those terms.
§ In summary: Those three things (sound, ear, and sound consciousness) lead the mind to make
contact with one’s sansāric habits. If the sensory input matches with his “gati” or “likings,”
he will instantly be attached. Within a split second of hearing a few lines of the song, the
teenager is “hooked”; his mind becomes absorbed in it.
§ It is really at this step that the teenager becomes interested in the song. Then he gets attached to
it (via “pati + icca“) BECAUSE it matches his gati.
Then comes the next line:
(iii). “Samphassa jā vedanā” (this comes from “san phassa jā vedanā“; it rhymes as “samphassa“)
means this “contact with san gati” leads to feelings.
§ As long as one has matching “gati,” the corresponding feelings arise automatically. We cannot
stop it, at least in the initial cittas or thoughts. But we can certainly stop progressing further and
uttering bad speech or doing immoral acts.
§ That is why it is essential to get rid of bad “gati.” Satipatthāna sutta describes how one
becomes a “sampajanno” by figuring out how to get rid of bad “gati“; see, “Kayanupassana –
The Section on Habits (Sampajanapabba).”
§ The way to getting rid of such “bad gati” is to be fully aware of our speech and actions and stop
such unsuitable speech or actions. That is what Kayanupassana is.
That is a VERY IMPORTANT step. The resulting feeling depends on whether someone will get
attached to the subject matter via greed or hate. If it is greed (or liking) as in the case of the teenager
listening to a song he likes, he gets a sukha vedanā (happy feeling). On the other hand, if it was a
heavy metal song, and if his grandfather hears it, the grandfather may instantly form a dukha vedanā
(unhappy feeling). That is if he has a dislike for heavy metal songs (different gati than the teenager).
That is the reason that different people feel differently about the same “event” (a picture, sound,
smell, taste, touch, or a thought about something).
Attachment (Taṇhā) Leads to Existences (Bhava)
Let us further analyze the above example:
The teenage could be walking a noisy street, but if he likes the song, he may not even hear any other
sound. He will get “attached” to the song and be absorbed in it. Even after the song, he thinks about it
in many ways. He may want to find the identity of the singer, may wish to see whether the singer has
more albums, how he is going to tell his friends about this, etc. That is the “sansāric wheeling”
process, see, “Nibbana – Stopping of the sansāric Vehicle,” where we discussed how one becomes an
Ariya by taking the wheels off of the sansāric vehicle (riya).
Now the teenager is attached (i.e., forms taṇhā):
(iv). “vedanā paccayā taṇhā, taṇhā paccayā upādāna, upādāna paccayā bhava, …”
The song became his existence or “bhava” (i.e., total awareness, existence) while he was listening.
He does not just listen, enjoy it while it lasts and moves onto something else. RATHER, he wants to
hear it again, maybe hear more songs like that too. That is taṇhā. Because of that, he starts craving
for it again and again, and also crave songs similar to that. Maybe he would form a liking for
anything associated with the song: its composer, singer, and may join the singer’s fan club. His mind
spends a lot of time “wheeling around” or “thinking about” things associated with the song;
temporarily, his existence or “bhava” becomes that song.
(v). Now let us go back to (i) of the sequence:
“Sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sota viññāṇaṃ,” or “Due to the sound of the song received by
the ear, gives rise to sound consciousness.”
§ That is just the ear receiving the sound. The teenage may hear many other sounds on the road.
The next step is a critical one for him. Would he get interested in that song?
§ “Tinnan san gati phasso.” Out of all the sounds that come in through the ears, he will be
attached only to the one that matches his “gati.”
Thus we get attracted to something due to our “old habits” (see, “Habits and Goals“), which are even
likely to be habits formed over many lives (see, “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“).
(vi). Now at the step #iv above, the sequence ends with further strengthening “his tendency (gati)” to
listen to this type of music; that is taṇhā. That is a crucial point. If we have an ingrained liking for
something, we will get attached it. Furthermore, repeated attachments will strengthen such an
affection or habit or “gati.” That is the law of attraction (see, “The Law of Attraction, Habits (gati),
and Cravings (Āsavas)“). Thus it becomes a vicious circle. That is why it is hard to break habits
(good or bad).
Summary
5. Please spend some time contemplating the above material. It is best if you can analyze your
situations and see how taṇhā arises via greed (likes) and hate (dislikes). I will discuss more cases
before moving on to discuss Paṭicca Samuppāda in detail. It is VERY IMPORTANT to understand
these fundamental ideas.
§ In the earlier post, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Overview,” we pointed out that Arahant experiences
suffering only due to kamma vipāka. An Arahant does not generate sorrow or happiness via the
mechanism discussed in this post; he/she will not have any “immoral or sense craving” gati. In
this case, “samphassa jā vedanā” does not lead to sukha or dukha vedanā.
§ We, on the other hand, generate “self-induced” suffering and happiness via this mechanism.
Any happiness generated will not be not long-lasting. This mechanism is, for example, the
leading cause for many “sleepless nights” or even depression. Let us discuss this next.
Next, “What is “Kāma”? It is not Sex“, ………..
3.5.3 Lobha, Raga and Kāmaccanda, Kāmarāga
There are various names for greed in Pāli. Each has a different meaning and the differences are
significant.
3. Raga (“rā” means cravings, “ga” means to touch or bind) means one believes there is pleasures to
be had in staying in saṃsāra (rebirth process), and thus one likes to stay around and enjoy the
worldly pleasures.
§ When one is born rich (or acquires wealth), and enjoys life with sense pleasures, that is not
lobha, that is just rāga. Such a person is not doing harm to the others; but such a person
COULD have lobha too. It is said that no matter how much one has, one wants more.
§ When one has lobha, one could do things highly immoral acts (even if one is rich). If one is
willing to kill, steal, lie, etc. to gain something one desires, then that is when one could acquire
“apayagami” kamma. One does not necessarily has to carry out these acts or speech; just
thinking about it and making abhisaṅkhāra (planning or even enjoying such thoughts) itself is
lobha. Thus even the poorest person can have lobha.
§ Even the devas in deva loka have rāga; they like to enjoy sense pleasures, but they don’t crave
for what others have; they do not have lobha.
4. Then there is kāmaccanda and kāma rāga, another set of decreasing levels (in that order) of
attachment to kāma loka. Kāma means attachment to the sense pleasure available in the kāma loka,
i.e., those available for the gratification of the five senses.
§ Kamaccanda is the highest level of that attachment. Here one is willing to do abhorrent acts
(killing, raping, etc) to satisfy one’s desires. When one has developed kāma to the kāmaccanda
level, one becomes unaware of the bad consequences of one’s actions; it is said that “one loses
one’s mind” when blinded by attachment to sense pleasures, i.e., one cannot think rationally
when one has kamacccanda.
§ Thus, one needs to be mindful not to let one’s kāma rāga develop into kāmaccanda, which is
one of the five hindrances that “cover the mind”.
5. When one has kāma rāga, one likes to enjoy sense pleasures, but not at the expense of others. Thus
when husband and wife engage in sexual activity, that is due to kāma rāga.
§ Inappropriate sexual activity (affairs outside marriage and rape) are done with kāmaccanda,
i.e., when one becomes blind with kāma.
6. It is also helpful to see how these different levels of greed are removed at various stages of
Nibbāna. This will give a better sense of differentiation.
§ A Sotāpanna has permanently removed kāmaccanda and also does not have the worst level of
lobha. Thus he/she will not engage in “apayagami” acts to gain sense pleasures. A Sotāpanna
has not given up kāma rāga.
§ A Sakadāgāmī also has kāma rāga to a lesser extent; this is why he could be reborn in the
kamaloka for one more time.
§ An Anāgāmī has removed kāma rāga; he will not return to any of the 11 eleven kāma loka
realms, including the human and deva realms, and will be reborn in the suddavasa in the rūpa
loka, and will attain Nibbāna there.
§ However, an Anāgāmī may still enjoy (but not attach to) sense pleasures, i.e., still has kāma;
see #3 of, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“ . This is a subtle point, but the point is that
an Anāgāmī would still have the “4 greed-based citta without wrong views”, and that is kāma.
Those four akusala citta are prevented from arising only for an Arahant.
7. Some may have given up the desire to enjoy pleasures in kāma loka, but like the jhānic pleasures.
Thus they have rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga (or the liking to wander about in rūpa loka and arūpa
loka). Rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga are removed only at the Arahant stage, as discussed in “Akusala
Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“.
Next, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha Versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“, ……..
3.5.4 Lobha, Dosa, Moha Versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā
1. It was explained in the previous post that lobha is extreme greed; see, “Lobha, Rāga and
Kāmaccanda, Kāmarāga“. One is willing to do any immoral act to get what one wants. One can
become blind by greed, i.e. kamachanda can arise.
§ Dosa (or dvesha) is the hate that arises due to lobha (dvesha comes from “devana” + “vesha”
— ද ෙවන වේශය — or second manifestation of lobha), especially when someone else is in the
way of getting what one wants.
2. And acts with lobha and dosa are done with moha. Moha comes from “muva” + “hā” which
symbolizes a vessel with it mouth closed; thus one cannot see what is inside. In the same way, one
acts with moha because one is totally unaware that such immoral acts will have very bad
consequences; one’s mind is totally dark.
§ When one has not removed the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi, one could act with moha. The 10
types of micchā diṭṭhi are discussed in, “Mahā Cattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great
Forty)“.
§ In the pancanivarana, lobha and dosa are listed as abhijjā [abhijjhā] and vyāpāda; those are
synonymous terms for lobha and dosa; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
3. Acts done with lobha, dosa, and moha are called pāpa kamma, strong versions of akusala
kamma. Such pāpa kamma make one eligible to be born in the lower four worlds.
§ Specifically, acts done with dosa are the worst with niraya (hell) as the possible destination,
and lobha is cause for rebirth in the preta (peta) loka of hungry ghosts. Acts done with both
lobha and dosa have all three “san” (since moha is always there), and thus lead to rebirth in the
animal or “thirisan” (“thiri”+”san” or all three “san”) realm.
§ As one engages in moral actions and gets rid of one’s tendency (“gathi”) to do immoral actions,
one starts “cooling down” and one’s likelihood of being born in the lower four realms diminish.
4. However, Lobha, dosa, moha are permanently reduced from one’s mind to rāga, paṭigha, avijjā
levels only when one attains the Sotāpanna stage. All pancanivarana are permanently removed at the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ Of course one is now able to “see” the real nature of the world (anicca, dukkha, anatta) to some
extent (one is not totally blind) and thus moha is reduced to avijjā level.
§ As explained in the previous post, rāga is the craving for sense pleasures. Of course there are
different levels here too, but in general this level of greed makes one eligible only for birth in
the human and deva worlds. Patigha is a lower level of hate, more like “friction”. One may get
annoyed when someone and even say something in return, but will never do anything “really
bad” that makes one eligible to be born in the lower four realms.
5. At the next level of Nibbāna of the Sakadāgāmī level, kāma rāga and paṭigha are both reduced to
the extent that one will not be reborn in the human level, but only deva or higher realms.
§ Kāma rāga is the rāga or craving for sense pleasures in the kamaloka. There are two levels of
kāma rāga: vatthu kāma (craving for OWNING objects that provide sense pleasures) and keles
or klesha kāma (craving for sense pleasures is there, but not necessary to “OWN THEM”). A
Sakadāgāmī has lost the vatthu kāma, but still has keles (or klesha) kāma, i.e., he/she still
craves for sense pleasures, but has no desire to “own them”. For example, a Sakadāgāmī may
still like to live in a nice house with comforts, but the desire to “own the house” is not there.
§ Above the human realm (in deva and brahma realms) beings have very fine bodies that are not
subjected to decay or diseases. Thus they never get sick or visibly old (but of course death is
inevitable to anyone anywhere in the 31 realms). This is why a Sakadāgāmī is said to be
healthy forever (after the human life).
6. When one attains the Anāgāmī stage, both kāma rāga and paṭigha are eliminated. Thus one will
not even be offended by harsh words/acts and will not retaliate. An Anāgāmī will never be born
anywhere in the kamaloka including the deva worlds; they are reborn only in brahma realms.
§ While a Sotāpanna may still have some tendency to give priority to sense pleasures at certain
times, all such tendencies are reduced at the Sakadāgāmī stage, and removed at the Anāgāmī
stage.
7. For an Anāgāmī, what is left of rāga is only rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga, i.e., desire for jhānic
pleasures in the rūpa and arūpa loka (the four rūpa jhānas and four arūpa jhānas). And he/she still
has avijjā left to a certain extent together with māna (some level of pride) and uddhacca (some
level of sense of superiority).
§ All these are eliminated at the Arahant stage. An Arahant is free from even a trace of
defilements and will never be reborn in “this world” of kāma loka, rūpa loka, or arūpa loka
(anywhere in the 31 realms).
§ This is why it is not productive to meditate trying to get rid of the sense of “self” before the
Sotāpanna stage. Many people incorrectly interpret anatta as “no self”. But the feeling of “me”
is removed only at the Arahant stage, after the Anāgāmī stage. As long as māna and uddhacca
are there, the sense of “me” is still there.
8. What needs to be done to get to the Sotāpanna stage is to realize the true meaning of anicca (that
there is no point in hurting others to achieve temporary sense pleasures), and that until one has that
mindset one is truly helpless in this round of rebirths (anatta).
§ Until one realizes that one is prone to act with extreme greed (lobha) and can act like a hungry
ghost (peta), then one has not been released from such a birth.
§ Until one grasps the true meaning of anicca, one could still act with extreme hate (dosa) in the
heat of the moment, and that can lead to a rebirth in the niraya (hell).
§ Until one realizes the unfruitfulness of depending on others by cheating/stealing (without trying
to make an honest living for oneself), one is not released from the asura realm.
§ Until one gets rid of “animal gathi” such as having sex with young children like dogs or being
able to kill others for one’s food or pleasure, etc., (i.e., both lobha and dosa) one is not released
from the animal realm.
§ Those are the four lower realms. Thus one will be truly helpless (anatta) unless one removes
such bad habits (“gathi“). Thus until then dukkha (suffering) is going to be there in the long-
term, if not in this lifetime. Those are the true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
3.5.5 What is Avijjā (Ignorance)?
1. People engage in immoral actions because they highly value the sense pleasures, and are unaware
of a better type of happiness called nirāmisa sukha; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is
Nirāmisa Sikha?“.
Therefore, they are willing to do even immoral things in order to gain sense pleasures. They do not
realize two drawbacks associated with such actions:
§ If they hurt others in trying to get what they want, they will have to pay for the consequences
with very high interest (law of kamma); these are the immoral acts that could lead to rebirth in
the apāyas (lowest four realms)
§ Whatever enjoyment one gets from such sense pleasures are temporary.
These facts come out naturally from the true nature of the world that include the non-stop rebirth
process that involves 31 realms and the law of kamma and the causal principle of paṭicca samuppāda.
It is not possible for anyone to realize these facts by oneself. One has to learn those from a Buddha or
a true disciple of a Buddha.
2. What is avijjā? It is basically the ignorance of those two facts, even though there is a whole
framework of a “world view” behind them. The key ingredients of this “wider world view” are:
§ “This world” is much more complex than what is readily observed with our five physical
senses, i.e., there are 31 realms instead of the just the two (human realm and the animal realm)
that are apparent to us; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ That the true nature of existence in any of the 31 realms is anicca, dukkha, anatta; see,
“Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta - Wrong Interpretations“.
§ That most suffering is encountered in the lowest four realms (apāyas).
§ And this perpetual birth/rebirth process has no beginning (see, “Infinity – How Big Is It?“) and
the only way to stop it is to attain the Arahant stage of Nibbāna.
§ But by reaching the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, one can be assured that rebirth in the apāyas
(lowest four realms) is permanently stopped; see, “Why a Sotāpanna is Better off than Any
King, Emperor, or Billionaire“.
3. The definition of avijjā is not understanding the Four Noble Truths. But to understand the Four
Noble Truths one needs to see the “true nature of the world”, the three characteristics of this world:
anicca, dukkha, anatta.
4. In brief, anicca, dukkha, anatta mean:
§ There is NOTHING in this world that can be maintained to our satisfaction in the long run
(anicca); thus, after much struggle we only end up with suffering (dukkha); thus, all these
struggles are in vain and one is helpless (anatta).
§ The above three characteristics are not just for the human realm: One cannot find any panacea
by seeking a better rebirth (even though the realms at and above human realm have less
suffering), i.e., none of the 31 realms can provide any lasting happiness, and we are truly
helpless (anatta).
§ In particular, if one does IMMORAL things (killing, stealing, etc) in seeking this illusory
happiness, the more one gets trapped in lower realms filled with suffering.
§ Unfortunately, the true meanings of anicca and anatta have been wrongly interpreted as
“impermanence” and “no-self”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“, and
the follow up posts on the correct interpretations.
5. For anyone willing to dig deeper: anicca, dikkha, anatta, are manifestations of the impermanence
nature “of this world” as described in many ways:
§ In Abhidhamma, it is explained how this world is “mind based”, and how both the mind and the
material phenomena CHANGE with incredible speed.
§ This “change” is not random, but is dictated by “cause and effect” or paṭicca samuppāda.
§ These and others relevant material is discussed at different sections on the site.
§ However, it is NOT necessary to learn all those details to achieve some “cooling down” or
‘niveema” or even various stages of Nibbāna. One can grasp the concepts of anicca, dukkha,
anatta via meditation or contemplation on one’s own life experiences.
6. When one does not comprehend this “big picture”, one makes bad decisions.
§ For example, a fish does not see the string or the hook, only sees the worm, and gets into
trouble. If it saw the whole picture, with the string and the hook, it may realize that there is
something wrong and would not try to grab the worm.
§ Just like the fish in the above example, we only see the pleasures to be had in this human life,
but do not realize that because of this “apparent pleasures” we are grabbing hold of a world that
also include unbearable suffering in the lowest four realms, not to mention the hidden suffering
in this life.
§ Only a Buddha can see this “bigger picture” and he has shown us not only that bigger picture,
but also the reasons why we should believe in that bigger picture. In this website, I hope to
provide this evidence in a systematic way.
7. That complex world view (everything changing moment-to-moment everywhere in those 31
realms) can be grasped only by a Buddha with a highly-purified mind.Other than a Buddha, a normal
human being (no matter how intelligent) is incapable of seeing that whole world view; see, “Godel’s
Incompleteness Theorem“.
§ Thus avijjā cannot be dispelled by “book knowledge”. One needs to comprehend the “true
nature of this complex world”.
§ Even when we are told about it, it is not easy to grasp it, because our minds have been covered
with defilements that have been accumulating from an untraceable beginning; see, “Key to
Calming the Mind“.
8. Another important factor that keeps many people “in the dark” or “in ignorance”is the wrong
impression that Buddha Dhamma is a pessimistic world view. With the pure Dhamma hidden for over
a thousand years, several important facts about the Four Noble Truths got distorted:
§ When the Buddha said “this world” is filled with suffering he meant the wider world of 31
realms. Also, he did not say, there is suffering ALL THE TIME or in all the realms of
existence. In higher realms (realms 6-31), there is actually much more happiness than suffering.
Even in the human realm (the 5th realm), there is more happiness than suffering for many
people. That is why it is hard for many people to get motivated to examine the message of the
Buddha.
§ Yet most beings spend most of the time in the lowest four realms (apāyas). This is why, ON
AVERAGE, the suffering in the saṃsāra (cycle of rebirths; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“) is
much higher compared to any kind of happiness that can be experienced in any realm.
§ Together with the wider “world view”, the concept of an unimaginably long rebirth process got
lost; see, “Sansāric Time Scale“. The fact that it is not possible to trace a beginning to this
rebirth process is not widely known. In the scale of the sansāric time scale, this lifetime of a
hundred or so years is negligible. Thus whatever “accomplishment” one achieves, it has a very
short duration in the sansāric time scale.
§ Also, Buddha was just the messenger who conveyed these dismaying FACTS about nature. He
discovered the nature’s laws, which clearly illustrate that it is not possible to find any LONG-
LASTING happiness ANYWHERE in these 31 realms. But he also pointed out how to find a
better and permanent kind of happiness.
9. The most important fact that has been lost for hundreds of years is that there is a happiness of a
better quality that also is PERMANENT. This is the Nibbānic bliss or the nirāmisa sukha; see,
“Three Kinds of Happiness“, “How to Taste Nibbāna“, and “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to
Understand?“. And one can start experiencing this nirāmisa sukha even before attaining the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna; see, “Key to Calming the Mind“. For more details, see, “Nirāmisa
Sukha“.
§ Not knowing any of those (and related facts) is avijjā (ignorance). If one does not know about
those facts, then how can one find a solution to the problem of suffering? Also, since only a
Buddha can discover these laws, without hearing the message from another person (or a
website!), there is no way anyone can learn all this by oneself, no matter how intelligent one is.
10. The Buddha compared avijjā to darkness. One cannot remove darkness forcefully. The ONLY
WAY to get rid of darkness is to bring in a light. In the same way, the Buddha explained, ignorance
can be removed only via cultivating wisdom.
§ No matter what else one does, one will not get rid of ignorance; one has to cultivate wisdom by
learning Dhamma. First, one cultivates wisdom to distinguish moral from immoral, and then
comprehend the true nature of the world, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Buddha Dhamma –
In a Chart“, and “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma“.
Next, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“, …………
3.5.6 Indriya and Āyatana – Big Difference
May 7, 2016; revised December 4, 2017
1.We have lived in this world of 31 realms forever, because we like to enjoy sense contacts. By
understanding how we actually experience these sense contacts, we will be able to see their true
nature.
§ In English language, we speak about the five physical senses of eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body.
We also talk about the mind that is supposed to “reside” in the physical brain, which is
supposed to process signals from the five senses and generate “consciousness” or awareness of
the external world.
§ Above is the conventionally and scientifically accepted theory, especially in the Western
World, but mostly in the Eastern World as well.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, it is important to realize that our sense faculties have two aspects: physical
and mental.
2. Thus there are two versions of sense faculties in Buddha Dhamma: “indriya” and “āyatana“.
§ The physical sense faculties are referred to as indriya.
§ But those indriya CAN BE used as āyatana depending on the situation. We will discuss the
difference.
§ Furthermore, we will also discuss how we literally “create our own future” by using our sense
faculties as not merely as indriya but as āyatana.
3. The five physical senses or the “indriya” are simply “physical instruments” mounted on our
physical bodies to extract information (vision, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches) from the external
physical world.
§ In addition, per Buddha Dhamma, there is another indriya (manindriya) to receive dhamma
(concepts, gathi, and bhava are synonyms) from the external world. This “mana indriya” or
manindriya is located inside the brain, and has not yet been identified by science.
§ This has been is discussed in detail in, “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis“.
4. Now let us see how these indriya can become āyatana. In simplest terms, indriya become āyatana
when we deliberately use the indriya to accumulate abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Another way to state the difference is to say that when kamma vipāka brings us sense inputs,
the sense faculties act as indriya. Following that we MAY deliberately use sense faculties to
generate new kamma; then they work as āyatana.
§ Let us consider some examples to illustrate the difference.
5. When we just happen to see a nice house (say, while walking), our eyes were used as cakkhu
indriya. But if we like that house and stop and keep looking at it (while making an attachment for it),
then we are using our eyes as cakkayatana.
§ If we eat something to quench the hunger, and experience the taste of it, then we are using the
tongue as jivha indriya. But if we form an attachment to it (and thinking about making some
more to enjoy the taste again later), then the tongue is used as jivhayatana.
§ When we walk to the bathroom to take a shower (which is something we need to do to stay
clean) that involves using the body as kāya indriya. But hitting (or walking to hit) another
person involves using the body as an āyatana (kayatana).
§ A teacher speaking to students is using the body as kāya indriya (does not involve
abhisaṅkhāra), but telling a lie or a gossip involves kayatana (does involve abhisaṅkhāra).
§ When we are using the mind to remember a forgotten address, we are using the mana indriya
(or manindriya). But when fantasizing about a sexual encounter, that involves mana āyatana
(or manayatana).
6. Another simple way to look at this distinction is to consider the cakkhu indriya as a totally
mechanical device (just like a camera) that just helps to get the image to the brain.
§ Cakkhayatana could come into play when that information is sent by the brain to the cakkhu
pasada rūpa and is processed by the hadaya vatthu (mind). Based on the personal character
(gathi) of the person, that person may generate greed or hate towards that visual. Then
cakkayatana (and possibly more other āyatana) may be used to take further actions.
§ The cakkhayatana never arises in an Arahant, because there is no anusaya or āsava
(defilements) remaining that can trigger greed or hate, i.e., there are no kāma gathi, rāga gathi,
dosa gathi, moha gathi, etc left.
§ The same kind of analysis can be done on any other sense faculty.
7. Now we can also look at this from a different angle and see that while indriya can be considered as
PHYSICAL devices that help “extract sense signals” from the outside world, āyatana are
MENTAL.
§ The six āyatana (the six are collectively called “salāyatana”) may be created at a given
moment depending on the situation and also depending on the gathi of the particular person.
§ In the “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“, saḷāyatana arise via, “nāmarūpa paccayā
saḷāyatana”. When we trace steps backwards, we see that nama rūpa arise via “viññāṇa
paccayā nāmarūpa“. Going further back,“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”, “avijjā paccayā
saṅkhāra”. Thus saḷāyatana arise as a series of mental actions starting with avijjā.
§ When one of the six indriya brings in a sense input, that sense input MAY induce greed or hate
due to avijjā and through the above series of paṭicca samuppāda steps to CREATE one or more
of the saḷāyatana to arise.
8. Thus our indriya do not change from moment-to-moment, but āyatana do.
§ For example, our eyes (cakkhu indriya) may not change significantly for years; of course an
accident can instantly change them or they can degrade with old age.
§ But cakkayatana change from moment-to-moment. We can be instantly attracted to an eye-
pleasing object.
9. In another example, suppose an alcoholic is walking around inside an airport waiting for a flight. If
he sees a bar, he may decide to stop and take a good look at it, think about for a minute and just go in
to have a drink.
§ The initial sense input (seeing the bar with cakkhu indriya), triggered his deeply-ingrained
craving (āsava, anusaya) for a drink to come to the mind. Then acting with avijjā, at least two
of the six āyatana arose in his mind: thinking about having a drink (manayatana), walking
inside and ordering a drink (kāyātana).
§ Many other people saw the same bar, totally disregarded it and kept walking. The sense input
from the cakkhu indriya did not lead to the arising of any of the saḷāyatana for them.
§ This is why even in a normal human, the sense faculties do not work as āyatana all the time.
10. If we live in this world, we have to use the sense faculties in order to live; here we use them as
indriya.
§ But when we use them as āyatana, we are in a sense making future bhava (especially if those
actions are strong).
11. Now we can also figure out what is really meant by the “indriya bhāvanā“. It simply means
making sure that the indriya do not become āyatana.
§ Of course, we need to focus on the most egregious acts first. For example, when one sees an
eye-catching object in a shop, stopping there and thinking about how nice it would be to be able
to take it home is making āyatana. But that is hard to avoid for a normal human who has not yet
attained a magga phala.
§ However, if the attraction to the object becomes strong, that could lead to āyatana other than
the cakkayatana come into play: one may decide to steal it. This is of course far too dangerous.
As soon as that mindset comes to play, one has to think about the consequences and forcefully
stop it.
§ Thus “indriya bhāvanā” is nothing but special application of the Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā. In fact,
“indriya bhāvanā” is to be practiced not in a “sitting down” meditation session, but while one is
doing normal day-to-day activities.
12. Thus only Arahants use their sense faculties as indriya ALL THE TIME. They do not form
attachments to body touches, tastes, odors, sounds (music), pictures, or any type of concepts
(thoughts).
§ Even a normal human does not use eyes as āyatana all the time. We may see numerous things
even during a short walk. Most of the things we see we just ignore, because they don’t interest
us. This is another way of saying that those things don’t trigger any anusaya or āsava in us or
we don’t have the gathi to form a liking for them.
13. Finally, it must be noted that there are other types of indriya that come into play in different
contexts.
§ For example, “panca indriya” in 37 Factors of Enlightenment refer to very different types of
indriya: sati, samādhi, paññā, viriya and saddhā; see, “37 Factors of Enlightenment” and “Two
Versions of 37 Factors of Enlightenment“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
240 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ There are five indriya in “panca indriya“, whereas there are six indriya in reference to sense
faculties.
These mind-made pleasures experienced with āyatana are called assāda (or āsvāda in Sinhala).
For an in-depth analysis, see, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
3.5.7 Hetu-Phala, Paccuppanna, and Paṭicca Samuppāda
The existence of anything in this world (i.e., a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) can be explained in a
step-wise process with three “steps”: (i) there must be root causes, (ii) there must be suitable
conditions, and (iii) whatever that arises due to those two steps will have characteristics (gathi) that
can traced back to those causes and conditions.
§ The title is pronounced as :
Weblink: Listen to the Title being pronounced
1. Nothing happens without causes in Buddha Dhamma. This is why there CANNOT be a beginning
to the rebirth process. That is a logical impossibility, and is THE main argument against creation by a
“Super Being” or a Creator.
§ CAUSE AND EFFECT is the backbone of science. In order for a scientific theory to be
accepted, that theory HAS TO have explanatory power to describe HOW a given effect takes
place.
2. It may be hard to fathom initially, but there are only 6 primary causes (roots) that causes anything
and everything in this world to arise: lobha, dosa, moha (three immoral roots or hetu), and alobha,
adosa, amoha (three moral roots).
§ The word “hetu” comes from the Sinhala words, “hayen ethu” which means “wrapped with
six”. Thus all causes are ultimately due to one more of the six roots mentioned above.
§ Also, “phala” in Pāli and Sinhala (“pala“) means “harvest” or the “result”.
§ Thus anything and everything in this world arises due to those six root causes.
3. The three immoral roots mainly give rise to the four lowest realms (apāyas) and the three moral
roots mainly give rise to the other 27 realms.
§ When one cultivates the three moral roots, one stays away from the apāyas and be able to be
born in the higher 24 realms. Furthermore, one also cleanses one’s mind so that one can begin
to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta (the true nature of the world); see, “Buddha Dhamma –
In a Chart“.
§ However, in most cases, we can see only the “immediate causes”. For example, a wet floor is
the immediate cause for someone to slip and fall. But if one was mindful (aware) of the wet
floor, the fall could have been avoided.
4. Such immediate causes (that derive from those six) are easier to see or to deduce. The causes for a
tree to come to life are embedded in a seed. When the seed is planted that causes a tree (or a plant) to
grow.
§ What causes an explosion from a bomb is in the explosive material in the bomb. There will not
be an explosion unless the bomb has potent explosive material in it.
§ How those are connected to the six root causes is a bit more involved, and needs a good
knowledge of Abhidhamma to fully explain.
5. Now, let us analyze how causes lead to corresponding effects. Just because there are causes,
corresponding effects do not necessarily appear. There must be appropriate CONDITIONS present to
bring out the effects.
§ A seed has embedded in it the causes to bring about a full-grown tree. But if that seed is in a
cool, dry place, no tree will come to life because of it.
§ But if the seed is planted in a good soil with exposure to sunlight, it can germinate and grow to
be a healthy tree.
§ The bomb will not explode unless it is triggered but a spark. If it is laying somewhere for many,
many years, the explosives may degrade and lose their explosive power.
6. This is called “paccuppanna” or “pacca” + “uppanna“, where “pacca” is for “paccaya” or
conditions. “Uppanna” means to come to life or birth.
§ Anything in this world (i.e., a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) is a paccuppanna, i.e, is born
when suitable conditions become available. But, of course, the root causes MUST also be there.
§ Thus even if there is a field out there with good soil and sunlight, nothing will grow unless
some seeds are planted.
§ Thus paccuppanna means “conditional arising”. This term “conditional arising” is used today
INCORRECTLY as the translation of paṭicca samuppāda. As we will see below, paṭicca
samuppāda also describe the nature of things that arise due to paccuppanna.
7. You can put this “theory” to test by considering anything in this world.
§ Any given living being is born due to a kammic energy that was created in the past. And that
kammic energy was created by a good act with moral roots or a bad act with immoral roots.
§ Even non-living things (vegetation, mountains, rivers, etc) are also there due to causes and
conditions. The analyses are a bit deeper and we will discuss some in the future.
8. The last step (in the three-step process that we started off with) says, whatever that arises due to
those two preceding steps will have corresponding characteristics (gathi). This is nothing but paṭicca
samuppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda”.
§ In the example that we discussed above, a given seed will not give to rise to any tree or a plant.
A rice seed will give rise to a rice plant. An apple seed will not give rise to a rice plant but an
apple tree, etc.
§ The same is true for living beings. A chicken will be born of a chicken egg, not a turtle. Note
that the other two conditions are satisfied here too: there was a being with “chicken saṅkhāra”
who came into that egg as a gandhabba, and that egg needs to be incubated correctly to be
hatched and for that hatchling to come out.
9. Actually, the steps paccuppanna and paṭicca samuppāda are not in a time sequence, but related.
The necessary conditions (paccaya) in paccuppanna are analyzed in detail in the paṭicca samuppāda
steps.
§ When an animal (say a dog) is born, the conditions that led to that birth can be traced in the
“Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda” cycle.
§ First, “bhava paccayā jathi” step says, that dog was born due to a “dog bhava“. The step,
“upādāna paccayā bhava” says that “dog bhava” arose due to a human grasping it at the dying
(cuti-paṭisandhi) moment; the step, “taṇhā paccayā upādāna” says that grasping was done due
to craving for it, and so on.
§ Note above that the human did not really crave to be a dog. Rather he/she enjoyed acts that are
normally done by dog. And that process started off with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“, where due
to ignorance of their consequences, he was cultivating “dog saṅkhāra“: For example, thinking,
speaking, and doing things that are done by dogs, for example, having indiscriminate sex
(sometimes with even family members).
10. We will discuss this more depth in future posts, but I hope the main ideas can be grasped from the
above description.
1. Diṭṭhi means dogmatic belief in something(s) in the sense of “this alone is true and everything else
is false regardless of the facts”. Even though micchā diṭṭhi (pronounced michchā diṭṭhi) is actually
the correct term (“diṭṭhi” means “views” and “micchā” is “wrong”), in Pāli literature “diṭṭhi” is used
frequently instead of “micchā diṭṭhi“; the immoral cetasika is diṭṭhi.
§ In the Buddha’s time it is said that there were 62 such dogmatic views that were the topics of
frequent discussions; they are listed in the Brahmajala Sutta.
§ The ditthasava (āsava for the 62 wrong views) is eliminated by diṭṭhivissuddhi, i.e., cleansing
of the wrong views at the Sotāpanna stage.
2. Some of these dogmatic views that the Buddha had to frequently deal with were: there is a
self, there is no self, reincarnation, no reincarnation, things exist, things do not exist, there are no
laws of kamma, there are laws of kamma AND they are deterministic.
§ The Buddha refuted those all. Unfortunately, some of those wrong views are back in most
versions of “Buddhism” today, most importantly the “no-self” (anāthma) concept.
§ We have discussed some (the first four items were discussed in several posts, for example,
“What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“, and “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“), and we will
discuss others in detail in the future.
3. Diṭṭhi (or micchā diṭṭhi) is also one of the ten immoral actions (diṭṭhi is done by the mind and also
leads to immoral speech and deeds; see below), and has already been discussed in, “Ten Immoral
Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
§ You can see that such thoughts arise due to dogmatic beliefs, i.e., when one is not willing to
even consider the possibility that one could be wrong and to critically examine the evidence.
For example, some people refuse to even examine the existing evidence for rebirth with an
open mind and that is diṭṭhi.
§ And one needs to know the “big picture of the 31 realms”, concepts of kamma, anicca, dukkha,
anatta, etc, to make a decision on rebirth; it is not enough to just to look at the accounts or
evidence for rebirth as presented in, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
4. There are three layers in which micchā diṭṭhi is established and accumulates bad kamma:
§ When one kills one’s parents with the diṭṭhi that a parent is not a special being, and that such
kamma do not have consequences; this is the coarse level. It can be compared to a fire that
burns down a house.
§ The second level comes to display when one vehemently defends such a wrong view in a
debate, and do not even consider the facts presented by the other side. It is possible that one
may genuinely believe in that position, BUT that is because one has not been exposed to the
whole picture on existence. The problem is that “not knowing the facts” does not help at the
end. One could jump off of a building not knowing how gravity operates, but will be subjected
to the same outcome. This middle level can be compared to a fire that ignites when the match
stick is struck on a hard surface.
§ The third level is the anusaya level, where these views lay dormant as āsavas (diṭṭhi āsava).
This finer level is likened to a box of matches that has the potential to start a fire.
5. Someone is said to have micchā diṭṭhi when one has wrong views at any of the three levels in #6
above. On the other hand, Sammā Diṭṭhi, can be two kinds:
§ One knows that bad kamma (actions) have bad consequences and can lead to bad rebirths. One
wants to live a moral life and strive for a “good rebirth”. This is “mundane or conventional
Sammā Diṭṭhi“. Thus these are still defiled views (have “kilesa” in them) since they lead to
extending saṃsāra, and one has not yet eliminated the possibility of a future rebirth in the
apāyas (four lower realms).
§ But when one comprehends to “true nature of this world”, one realizes that there can be no
lasting happiness anywhere in the 31 realms of existence. This Sammā diṭṭhi is gleaned when
one truly comprehends anicca; see, “Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta”
is so Important?“.
§ This is the “transcendental or lokuttara Sammā Diṭṭhi” that leads to Nibbāna; it is free of
defilements or “kilesa” or “keles” (in Sinhala). This view becomes complete at the Arahant
Stage. Kilesa are discussed in, “What Are Kilesa (Mental Impurities)? – Connection to
Cetasika“.
6. Thus conventional Sammā Diṭṭhi means the view to “do good things”; one understand kamma and
knows the consequences of bad deeds; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ As we discussed in “Foundation of Dhamma“, “doing good things” is better but most of those
things are done with the wrong intention of achieving something in return (good rebirth,
winning a lottery, pass an examination, etc. ). This kind of Sammā Diṭṭhi will perpetuate the
sansāric journey, but is a required first stage to comprehend anicca.
§ The danger in stopping at the conventional sammā diṭṭhi is of course that we do not know what
one will do in a future life (say another human birth): one could be born under circumstances
where one is not exposed to Buddha Dhamma, may associate with bad people, and may commit
kamma that will lead to rebirth in the apāyas (lowest four realms). The other danger is that we
do not know what kind of kamma we have done in previous lives, and we may already have
some bad kamma seeds that could lead to a birth in the apāyas.
7. Thus, by lokuttara Sammā Diṭṭhi is meant the true understanding of the nature of “this world” of
31 realms and the round of rebirths: for example, that “there is a self” and “there is no-self” are both
incorrect and things (both animate and inanimate) exist if the conditions for their existence are
present (paṭicca samuppāda). Even though one partially comprehends Sammā Diṭṭhi at the Sotāpanna
stage, the understanding becomes complete only at the Arahant stage.
8. If one cultivates the “lokottara” Sammā Diṭṭhi and becomes a Sotāpanna, then one will be free
from rebirths in the apāyas. In a Sotāpanna, the four “diṭṭhi sahagatha lobha citta” (the four greed-
based immoral thoughts that arise due to wrong views) do not arise; see, “Akusala Citta – How a
Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“.
Next, “How do we Decide which View is Diṭṭhi (Wrong View)?“, ………
3.5.9 Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra
Pronunciation of Pāli words like vacī, vitakka, and vicara can be found in “Pāli Glossary – (L-Z)“.
1. Many people believe that vacī saṅkhāra are involved only in speech, i.e., when one speaks out.
However, vacī saṅkhāra are defined as “vitakka vicara vacī saṅkhāra“, which means “vacī saṅkhāra
are vitakka and vicara“. This is in, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral: Cūḷavedalla Sutta (MN
44)“.
§ In the following we will see that vacī saṅkhāra are our conscious, deliberate thoughts in
addition to speech.
§ Furthermore, this post explains how our minds initiate all our actions and speech via javana
citta.
2. Vitakka is the cetasika that points the mind to a given thought object (arammana). Vicara cetasika
keeps the mind engaged on that thought object, i.e., generating new thoughts about it. In
Abhidhamma, this has been compared to a bee flying to a certain flower (vitakka) and then buzzing
around that flower (vicara) while drinking nectar.
§ In the same way, when we focus the mind on a certain object, and then keep the mind there, we
generate many thoughts about that object; these are conscious, deliberate thoughts, and not
mano saṅkhāra that arise automatically.
§ For example, if we start thinking about an enemy, we could be spending a many minutes or
even hours thinking bad thoughts (vacī saṅkhāra) about that person. We do most of that in
our minds, just talking to ourselves. But we may also get some of those thoughts out as
actual words.
3. However, vitakka and vicāra involve defiled thoughts or at least thoughts about getting things
done to live this life.
§ When one generates thoughts that specifically do not involve kāma rāga or other akusala —
but the opposites (nekkhamma/kusala) — those are called savitakka and savicāra.
§ That is how one gets into jhāna: By eliminating (or suppressing) vitakka/vicāra and cultivating
savitakka/savicāra.
§ This is clearly seen in any sutta that describe jhāna. For example, in “WebLink: suttacentral:
Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)“: “..So kho ahaṃ, ānanda, vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi
dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja
viharāmi.” When one is a jhāna, vitakka/vicāra with kāma rāga/akusala are absent and only
savitakka/savicāra will be present.
§ In the above verse, “vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi” means kāma
rāga/akusala are absent in the mind while in jhāna.
4. In contrast, when we first thought about that person in the example of #2 above, only mano
saṅkhāra were AUTOMATICALLY generated according to our gati. We don’t have any control over
mano saṅkhāra other than by changing our gati over time.
§ This is a key point to grasp, and is discussed in detail in the posts, “How Are Gathi and Kilesa
Incorporated into Thoughts?” and “Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda” as well as
other posts in the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ My goal in this post is to point out this critical difference between mano and vacī saṅkhāra, and
to clarify why both our non-automatic, conscious thoughts — as well as speech — are included
in vacī saṅkhāra.
5. Kāya saṅkhāra involves kamma done with bodily actions. So, it is possible for one to come to the
wrong conclusion that speech also is kāya saṅkhāra, since body parts (tongue, lips and associated
facial muscles) are moved during speech.
§ I automatically came to that wrong conclusion when I first analyzed these terms, without
contemplating deeply on them. The key is that speech originates via types of rūpa that are
different from those rūpa that lead to other bodily movements (like walking or moving arms).
§ In order to understand this, one needs to have some idea of how our body parts move according
to our thoughts.
6. Our physical body parts are really mechanical parts. There is no “life” in them unless a gandhabba
controls that body. Gandhabba is an important concept in Buddha Dhamma, but has been neglected
simply because it is not discussed in the infamous Visuddhimagga and other literature by
Buddhaghosa, who single-handedly distorted Buddha Dhamma; see, “Incorrect Theravāda
Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
§ The concept of Gandhabba is an essential element in Buddha Dhamma; see, “Gandhabba State
– Evidence from Tipiṭaka“.
§ Without the concept of Gandhabba, it is not possible to explain the difference between bhava
and jāti: “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“, and not believing it a
micchā diṭṭhi: “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ Tirokudda sutta is a famous sutta that describes the gandhabba as “tirokudda“; see,
“Antarabhava and Gandhabba” and posts referred to there.
7. Let us briefly discuss how the mind of the gandhabba controls a physical body. The physical body
is composed of 32 body parts just like a robot is made out of its various parts. What gives life to this
physical body is the gandhabba, a very fine body smaller than an atom in modern science.
§ Even though the gandhabba is negligibly small in “weight”, it has this fine body that spreads
over the physical body like a fine mesh; it is more like an energy field. There is a fine nervous
system associated with the gandhabba that overlaps the physical nervous system consisting of
billions of nerve cells.
§ Gandhabba also has the seat of mind (hadaya vatthu) and five pasada rūpa (that receive
signals from the five physical senses via the brain) located close to the physical heart; see,
“Brain – Interface between Mind and Body” for details.
8. How can such a negligibly small gandhabba move a heavy physical body? Gandhabba is more like
a signal source that gives appropriate commands. It is the brain (which is a very sophisticated
computer) that translates those commands into actual signals given to the physical nervous system.
§ The energy to move those body parts comes from the food that we eat.
§ In the post, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, and other related
posts this is discussed in more detail. But let us discuss the concept using an example, without
getting into those details.
9. When someone decides to move his arm, it is actually the mind that resides in the gandhabba that
makes that decision that makes that decision (and generates corresponding vacī saṅkhāra). Then that
signal is sent to the brain and the brain converts that “mental signal” into chemical signals that are
transmitted through the nervous system to the muscles in the arm, which in turn move the arm.
§ The energy produced by the digestion of our food goes into energize the brain, as well as to
move body parts.
§ So, the energy spent by the gandhabba is a negligible fraction of the energy that is needed to
move body parts and to keep the brain functioning. This can be compared to the tiny amount of
energy spent by a computer in controlling a fighter jet. The fighter jet gets its energy from the
fuel burned, just like our physical body gets its energy from the food digested.
§ We generate that small energy in our thoughts — via javana citta — as we discuss below.
10. The commands from the gandhabba are signals or tiny amounts of energy, and these come in two
varieties: kāya viññatti rūpa and vacī viññatti rūpa. These are two of the 28 types of rūpa in
Abhidhamma.
§ The kāya viññatti rūpa control bodily movements, and vacī viññatti rūpa control speech.
§ These “rūpa” or “energy signals” are created in javana citta that arise in our thought streams or
citta vīthi. Again, more information can be found in the Abhidhamma section.
11. Speech — done with vacī viññatti rūpa — is different from moving body parts. Speech involves
complex muscle movements that are not yet understood by science. Moving body parts — done with
kāya viññatti rūpa — is simpler.
§ What is behind vacī viññatti rūpa are vitakka and vicara cetasika that are in those javana citta
responsible for speech. However, when we just “talk to ourselves”, the javana citta responsible
are weaker than those responsible for actual speech. But those two cetasika are in both types of
javana citta.
§ Those javana citta that are responsible for physical action (like raising an arm or walking)
involve kāya viññatti rūpa, and the javana citta that generate those are even stronger.
§ Therefore, both vacī saṅkhāra (whether talking to oneself or actually speaking) and kāya
saṅkhāra (bodily actions) involve javana citta. All kamma that can be controlled directly by us
are done via javana citta; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power“.
12. The initial decision to generate vacī or kāya saṅkhāra actually happens at the vottapana citta,
which comes just before the 7 javana citta in a citta vīthi, which has 17 citta in total; see, “Citta Vīthi
– Processing of Sense Inputs“, and other related posts in the Abhidhamma section.
§ That “initial reaction” to a sense input comes AUTOMATICALLY in the vottapana citta, and
the nature of that reaction depends on one’s gati. Thus, the AUTOMATIC mano saṅkhāra are
generated in that vottapana citta.
13. If you are not familiar with Abhidhamma, don’t be discouraged by these details. I wrote this post
to provide undeniable evidence that vacī saṅkhāra are generated not only during speech but also
while “talking to oneself”.
§ But for those who are familiar with Abhidhamma, the relationship between terminology and
concepts could become much more clear with this discussion.
14. Now let us take a couple of examples to illustrate this without Abhidhamma. When one is
doing a kammattana (i.e., meditation recital), one could either say the phrase(s) out loud or one could
recite in one’s head. Both involve vacī saṅkhāra.
§ A kammattana can be done in either of those two ways, and both involve vacī saṅkhāra.
§ Furthermore, the more one understands the concepts behind the meditation phrase, the more
powerful those javana citta will be, and thus more effective the meditation session becomes.
§ By the way, when one is starting on meditation, it is better to say the phrases out loud because
it is easier to keep the mind on that topic. When one gets better at it, one could just recite it
internally, without getting the words out.
§ This is an example of a puññabhi saṅkhāra (meritorious deed) that involves vacī saṅkhāra.
15. Now let us consider an apuññabhi saṅkhāra (immoral deed) that involves vacī saṅkhāra, where
one starts generating bad thoughts about an enemy or a person that one dislikes. One could be
generating a lot of such vacī saṅkhāra internally, without saying a single word. However, when the
feelings get strong, the words may just come out because the javana power of those javana citta
could become uncontrollable.
§ Even though the javana power involved in “silent vacī saṅkhāra” are less than those involved
in speech, one could be generating much more of those “silent vacī saṅkhāra” and thus could
be generating more kamma vipāka.
§ Just like in the earlier example, the “power” behind those javana citta with vacī saṅkhāra will
be higher when the degree of hate associated with that person is higher. That is why it is harder
to control oneself, when one is dealing with a person that one really hates.
16. In the Noble Eightfold Path, Sammā sankappa deals with only one component of vacī saṅkhāra,
those conscious thoughts without speech. Getting rid of all vacī saṅkhāra involve both Sammā
Sankappa and Sammā Vaca.
§ “Sankappa” in Pāli or “sankalpana” in Sinhala means conscious thoughts that involve “san” or
things that contribute to the sansāric journey (rebirth process). Here “sankalpanā” comes from
“san” + “kalpana“, where “kalpanā” means conscious thoughts. When one keeps thinking
about something, those thoughts are called “sankalpanā“.
§ Of course “san” is a key Pāli term in Buddha Dhamma; see the posts in the subsection, “San“.
Sammā means to get rid of, as discussed in the same section.
§ Therefore, sammā sankappa or Sammā sankalpanā means removing bad conscious and
deliberate thoughts, and cultivating moral thoughts.
§ Sammā vaca involves stopping immoral speech and generating moral speech.
17. The main point to be extracted from this discussion is that one needs to be very careful about
generating hateful (or greedy) conscious thoughts for long times. When one becomes aware of such
thoughts, one CAN stop them. This is the basis of both Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā.
§ We always think conscious thoughts (vacī saṅkhāra of the first kind) before acting on them,
either via speech (vacī saṅkhāra of the second kind) or via bodily actions (kāya saṅkhāra)!
§ This is discussed in detail in, “How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?“,
“Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda“, “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering
in This Life“, as well as other posts in the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ Experiencing pleasing sense objects (called kāma guna) is not kāma. Generating vacī saṅkhāra
(or kāma sankalpanā) about them is kāma; see, “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga,
Kāmaccandha“.
3.5.10 Kāmaccandha and Icca – Being Blinded by Cravings
1. Kāmaccandha is a Pāli word which has roots in the key word “icca” (pronounced “ichcha”),
§ There is no need to look for Sanskrit roots to find meanings hidden in Pāli words, and this is a
good example.
§ Kāmaccandha is one of the five hindrances (panca nivarana); see, “Key to Calming the Mind –
The Five Hindrances“.
2. Kāmaccandha (“kāma”+“icca”+ “andha”) means the POSSIBILITY to be blinded by sense
desires. We will analyze it below. First let me explain the pronunciation of the key words “icca” and
“anicca“.
§ The Pāli word that is spelled in English as “icca” is pronounced as “ichcha”, and has the
meaning of liking/craving.
§ “Na” + “icca” is “anicca“, which basically means “(in the long term) it is not possible to get
what one craves, likes, or wants”.
§ “Na” + “icca” is “anicca“, just like “na” + “āgāmī” is “Anāgāmī“. [āgāmī : (adj.), coming; one
who comes.]
Such “combined words” are very common in Pāli. I will just show two examples from the
Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta:
§ “yampicchaṃ na labhati tampi dukkhaṃ” is “yam pi iccham na labhati tam pi dukkham“. Here
“strong craving” is expressed by adding an extra “h” to go from icca to iccha.
In the present case, “Kāma”+“icca”+ “andha” becomes Kāmaccandha.
§ That is similar to “ayamantimā jāti” in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta coming from “ayam
antima jāti”.
Here is an audio recording on how these words are pronounced:
WebLink: audio pronounciation of kāmaccandha Download
3. Now let us look at the meaning of the other components of the word kāmaccandha.
§ Here “kāma” conventionally means indulging in sense pleasures that belong to the kāma loka:
eye, ear, nose, tongue, and the body; “andha” means blind.
§ If the attraction for something becomes so strong that one’s mind may become “blind to
rational thought”. Mind can lose any control over what is sensible and what is not sensible (or
immoral). Kāmaccandha means “blinded by cravings for sense pleasures”.
§ Anyone who has not comprehending Tilakkhaṇa (for which removal of the 10 types of micchā
diṭṭhi is a pre-condition), would have kāmaccandha.
§ However, one with kāmaccandha MAY not commit any immoral action, unless the temptation
becomes “high”.
4. When a strong sense input comes, one could be blinded about the possible consequences and may
do something immoral.
§ For example, if one gets an opportunity to rob or even kill someone without getting caught, that
could become very tempting.
§ We have heard about situations where well-know people who are considered to be “highly
moral” are charged with rape or taking large bribes.
5. This possibility of generating kāmaccandha is removed when one attains the Sotāpanna stage of
Nibbāna. Kāmaccandha will be reduced to kāma rāga for a Sotāpanna.
§ Having kāma rāga means one still has cravings for sense pleasures, but WILL NOT do
anything immoral to get such sense pleasures.
§ For example, a Sotāpanna could a happily married person taking care of a family and engaging
in sexual activities with the spouse. He/she may like to enjoy other sense pleasures too.
§ Kāma rāga is removed only at the Anāgāmi stage of Nibbāna.
6. Now, let us analyze the word “kāma” in a bit more detail. The true meaning of “kāma” comes from
the WebLink: suttacentral: Nibbedhika Sutta (AN 6.63):
“Saṅkapparāgo purisassa kāmo,
Netekāmā yāni citrāni loke;
Saṅkapparāgo purisassa kāmo,
Tiṭṭhanti citrāni tatheva loke;
Athettha dhīrā vinayanti chandanti.”
§ Kāma is defined as “sankappa rāga about sense pleasing material things (citrāni loke)”. And
“sankappa” means “generating conscious thoughts”.
§ For example, Sammā Sankappa in the Noble Eightfold Path is about “contemplating on fruitful
Dhamma concepts with the Nibbāna as the goal”.
§ Vaci saṅkhāra include BOTH sankappa (conscious thoughts) and vācā (speech); they both
depend on the cetasika (mental factors) of vitakka and vicāra that arise in the mind based on
one’s mindset, see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
7. The above explanation provides us with a way to start reducing kāmaccandha even before one gets
rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi.
§ It is important to note that “kāma” is not just engaging in activities to fulfill sense pleasures;
“kāma” includes indulging in conscious thoughts about the five sense faculties that belong to
the kāma loka: eye, ear, nose, tongue, and the body.
§ Most times, people enjoy just thinking about sense pleasures, for example, sex or food.
§ Every time one engages in generating conscious thoughts about sense pleasures, one’s
kāmaccandha will increase. By cutting down on such “day dreaming”, one could reduce one’s
kāmaccandha.
§ However, it will be permanently reduced to the kāma rāga level only at the Sotāpanna stage.
8. Even when one has kāmaccandha, one may be able to SUPPRESS it temporarily by focusing the
mind on a neutral object, for example, on breath or a kasina object.
§ That is how ancient yogis, and even some people today are able to get cultivate jhānās by
engaging in breath or kasina meditations.
§ Furthermore, one would need to be abstaining from akusala kamma.
9. This is why in any sutta that describes jhāna has the following verse: “..bhikkhu vivicceva kāmehi
vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
upasampajja viharati..”
§ That means even to get to the first jhāna, one would need to be abstaining from akusala
kamma (vivicca akusalehi dhammehi) and kāma sankappa (vivicceva kāmehi).
§ Therefore, it is clear from the above discussion that even a Sotāpanna is not guaranteed to be
able to attain jhānās.
§ Jhānas are different from magga phala. We all have cultivated jhānās in our deep past. It is
easier to get to jhānās for those who have practiced jhānās in recent lives.
§ However, one needs to attain a magga phala just once.
10. One can get an idea about that by considering the fact that such “sense pleasing things” are not
there in brahma loka.
§ A rūpa loka brahma (i.e., a rūpāvacara brahma) has a very fine body and does not have a nose
to smell, a tongue to taste, or a solid enough body to feel touch. It can only see and hear.
§ Since a brahma cannot taste, smell or touch, a brahma does not engage in those sense pleasures
that are available in the kāma loka like tasting food, smelling nice aroma, or engage in sex sex.
Brahmās are unisex. However, even a human female who cultivated jhānās and is born as a
brahma is said to be have “purisa gati” as a brahma: WebLink: suttacentral: Bahdhātuka Sutta
(MN 115). That term “purisa” is not used in the sense of “male” (Atthapurisa puggalā include
women who have comprehended the Four Noble Truths, i.e., belong to the Saṅgha).
§ Kāmaccandha involves only those sense pleasures that are available only in kāma loka.
11. Jhānic pleasures are cultivated by at least suppressing kāma rāga; see, “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ That involves subsiding the “heating of the mind” due to kāma rāga.
§ We don’t realize it, but our minds are heated and agitated by the desire for sense pleasures.
However, the desire for sense pleasures cannot be removed by sheer will power, and becomes
possible normally after the Sotāpanna stage; see, “Is It Necessary for a Buddhist to Eliminate
Sensual Desires?“.
12. “Tāpa” (pronounced “thāpa”) means heat; when we get really stressful we feel a “fire” in the
heart. When it gets really bad, people say, “I could feel my heart burn” when they hear an extremely
poignant news.
§ In the case of getting angry, we can definitely feel this “fire” within; see, “How to Taste
Nibbāna“.
§ Even though we do not realize it, even engaging in kāma sankappa (“day dreaming about sense
pleasures”) — let alone engaging in them — leads to a “highly perturbed state of mind”.
§ And “ātāpi” is to remove that “fire” from the heart and the stress from the mind, and calm the
mind. This is the “cooling down”, “niveema“, “nivana“ or early stages of Nibbāna.
13. This is actually what is meant by the verse, “ātāpī sampajāno, satimā vineyya loke abhijjhā
domanassam” in the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta.
§ It basically means: “get rid of the fire or heat in the mind by being aware of kilesa or
defilements and by removing extreme greed (abhijjhā) that leads to a depressed mind
(domanassa) through discipline (vineyya)”.
§ We will discuss this in detail later, but here is the summary: When one gets angry, that is
domanassa. When one has strong sense desires that is abhijjhā.
§ When one can at least suppress abhijjhā and domanassa, one’s mind automatically gets to
samādhi.
14. These are just basic principles. Furthermore, one cannot get rid of abhijjhā domanassa quickly
just by sheer will power.
§ One needs to learn pure Dhamma and understand the basic principles of WHY a mind gets
heated, excited, and becomes vulnerable to doing more akusala kamma.
§ First thing to realize is that one’s actions (kamma) are going to have consequences (vipāka), if
not in this life in future lives.
§ And that is not possible without rebirth. This is why rebirth is a built-in foundation of Buddha
Dhamma.
1. The five aggregates (pañcakkhandha; pronounced panchakkandhā) are: rūpa (material aspects),
saññā (perception), vedanā (feelings), saṅkhāra (immoral/unfruitful activities; see, “Avijjā paccayā
Saṅkhāra“), and viññāṇa (loosely translated as consciousness). Panca is five and khandha is a heap
(in Sinhala, a “kanda” is a hill); thus pañcakkhandha is “five heaps”. Sometime it is called
pancaskhandha, but that is the Sanskrit name and does not give the clear meaning.
§ Some people believe pañcakkhandha means one’s own body. That is WRONG. Even the
pañcakkhandha is MENTAL; it has mental impressions of rūpa (matter) that are in the world.
Therefore, all five aggregates are MENTAL.
§ One's IMPRESSION of everything “in this world” (according to each individual) is included in
the five aggregates (pañcakkhandha). That is everything that anyone CAN EVER experience.
Panñakkhandha encompasses all material and mental aspects and are all mental.
§ You may want to first read the post, “Difference Between Rūpa and Rūpakkhandha” to get the
basic idea explained in a simple way.
2. Each of the five components of pañcakkhandha can be categorized in eleven ways; see,
WebLink: suttacentral: Khandha sutta (SN 22.48): past, present, future, near, far, coarse
(olarika), fine (sukuma), internal (ajjatta) , external (bahijja), liked (paneeta), disliked
(appaneeta). An acceptable English translation of the Khandha sutta is available online: WebLink:
accesstoinsight.org: Khandha Sutta: Aggregates.
§ This is what I mean when I say it is unimaginably huge and includes everything in this world.
§ For example, one component is the rūpa skandha (collection of material forms). It is divided
into two parts: internal (adhayathmika or ajjatta) and external (bahira or bahijja). Internal rūpa
are the five physical senses: eye (cakkhu), ear (sota), nose (ghāṇa), tongue (jivha), and body
(kaya). These are actually not the physical eye, ear. etc that we see, but very fine rūpa.
§ When we die all internal rūpa (cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā), and kāya) die too, i.e., they are no
longer associated with the dead body. The physical body loses the “vitality” and becomes just a
“lifeless log” like a piece of wood. While all other four fine internal rūpa are located close to
the heart (scientists will not be able to detect them), the kaya rūpa is spread all over the body;
that is why we can “feel” all over the body (except nails and hair); see, “Ghost in the Machine –
Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
§ All other material “things” or rūpas “in this world” belongs to the external rūpa category: other
people, houses, planets, galaxies, etc, i.e., absolutely everything else.
§ And we need to remember that rūpa include ALL material phenomena: vanna (pictures or
things we customarily call “rūpa“), sadda (sounds), gandha (smells), rasa (taste), and pottabba
(touch).
3. Pancaupādānakkhandha (or panca upādānakkhandha) is a VERY SMALL subset of
pañcakkhandha. Pancaupādānakkhandha includes only those things and concepts in this world that a
given person interacts with or has attachments for. This can be visualized easily as follows:
§ If pañcakkhandha is a huge wall, a fly landing on the wall makes contact or grasps that wall
only with its six legs. Thus for that fly, what it touches with its tiny six feet (the contact area is
minuscule) can be compared to pancaupādānakkhandha; the pañcakkhandha is the whole huge
wall.
§ Just like the fly is holding onto the wall with its six legs, we are grasping (upādāna) this world
with our six senses: we see, hear, smell, taste, touch, and think about only a minuscule amount
of things the world offers.
§ Therefore, we are bound to “this huge world” only via a very few things, and that is all we have
to “give up” or discard in order to attain Nibbāna. Please contemplate on this and come back
and read this post once-in-a-while. It will sink in as one’s knowledge of Dhamma grows.
4. We experience this outside world by seeing those objects, hearing sounds, smelling ordors, tasting
foods, touching objects, and also thinking about not only “physical things”, but also concepts. All that
experience is included in the other four aggregates: we sense them (saññā or perception), we feel
them (vedanā or feelings), we accumulate abhisaṅkhāra (kamma) by attaching/rejecting them, and
we “know about them” (viññāṇa or consciousness).
§ Thus it is clear that each of us experiences or grasps only a tiny fraction of pañcakkhandha.
5. That is a brief summary of pancaupādānakkhandha, the five aggregates that is clung to. If we
do not generate saṅkhāra, then it becomes just pañcakkhandha.
§ Please read the above carefully, until you see the difference between pañcakkhandha and
pancaupādānakkhandha. When an Arahant experiences any external object he/she does not
generate any abhisaṅkhāra. Thus an Arahant does not have a pancaupādānakkhandha.
§ Normally we just say saṅkhāra in the place of abhisaṅkhāra. But it is only abhisaṅkhāra that
lead to rebirth. Thus an Arahant does saṅkhāra, but not abhisaṅkhāra, i.e., there is no
“upādāna” or “clinging”. This is discussed in the posts on “san” and “saṅkhāra“.
§ But an ordinary person generates greedy, hateful, or ignorant thoughts and generates (abhi)
saṅkhāra when experiencing external objects, and thus has pancaupādānakkhandha.
§ Thus, the difference between pañcakkhandha and pancaupādānakkhandha depends on the
(abhi)sankharakkandha.
§ Also, we see that each person has his/her own pancaupādānakkhandha, because the saññā,
vedanā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa (as well as the external and internal rūpa) are going to be
unique to that person.
3.6.2 Difference Between Rūpa and Rūpakkhandha
Introduction
§ Any rūpa that one sees at present (paccuppanna rūpa) goes to the category of atita rūpa in a
split second.
More Types of Rūpa in Rūpakkhandha
5. Internal (ajjhatta) rūpa are those that are part of oneself: all body parts, including the ones inside
the body. External (bahiddha) rūpa are, of course anything outside of one’s body. Coarse (olārika)
rūpa are what we call “solid matter,” and fine (sukuma) rūpa are “energy” (heat, sound, etc.).
§ There are rūpa that one dislikes (hīna), and there are others that one likes (panita).
§ Some rūpa are located far (dūre) and some are located near (santike).
§ Therefore, we see that there could be some overlaps between these categories.
§ Many of these in the rūpakkhandha we have not even seen. For example, we have a mental
impression of our hearts, but we have not seen our hearts. We may not have seen some
landmarks like Chinese Great Wall, but only pictures of them. Yet, we do have mental
impressions of those.
Difference Between Rūpa and Rūpakkhandha
6. Now we can see the main difference between rūpa and rūpakkhandha.
§ A rūpa either of the following two kinds. A solid object that one sees with one’s eyes or
touches with one’s body (a person, a person’s body or a body part, a tree, a planet, star, etc.).
OR, it is a form of sensory input that we get through the other three sense doors (smells, tastes,
or sounds).
§ rūpakkhandha are MENTAL IMPRESSIONS of those external rūpa. They are NOT tangible
or have any energy in them. One’s rūpakkhandha is INFINITE. It has records of ALL one has
seen in ALL past lives going back and back in time without “an actual beginning.”
§ That is why those with iddhi (supernormal) powers can recall events that took place billions of
years ago. The Buddha, of course, recalled how he received first “niyata vivarana” or
confirmation that he will become a Buddha trillions of years ago, from Buddha Deepankara.
7. Let us take another example to visualize this difference between actual rūpa and rūpakkhandha.
§ I will take, as an example, the twin towers in New York that were destroyed in the 2001
terrorist attack.
§ If one had seen those twin towers in New York, one could still recall them in one’s mind. Those
physical structures are not there anymore, but they are in one’s rūpakkhandha!
§ But the actual rūpa that were there in New York are no longer there.
8. Since we have seen very different things in our lives (and in past lives), our rūpakkhandha are very
different. Each has his/her rūpakkhandha.
§ We can see that each has his/her vedanākkhandha, saññākkhandha, saṅkhārakkhandha, and
viññāṇakkhandha.
§ All of them can be analyzed in the same way. But all those (unlike some rūpa of solid matter)
exist only while being experienced.
Pañcupādāna Are Mostly Memories
9. Without those mental impressions (pañcupādāna), we will not be able to live our lives.
§ For example, we have seen, smelled, touched, and tasted apples in the past (we have also heard
the sound of biting into an apple). They are all in our pañcakkhandha, and our minds
automatically use those records to identify an apple INSTANTLY.
§ We discussed this recently in the post, “The Amazing Mind – Critical Role of Nāmagotta
(Memories).”
§ All those concepts that we have discussed fit in well in this jigsaw puzzle of the workings of the
mind. It is very complex, but once one understands the basics, it becomes much more
manageable.
Saṅkhāra Lead to Pañca Upādāna Khandhā (Pañcupādānakkhandhā)
10. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with recalling past events. The problem arises when we get
attached to them and start re-creating those events in our minds and enjoy them.
§ Kammā (which lead to kamma vipāka) generated in three ways: mano kamma, vacī kamma, and
kāya kamma. They are done via mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, and kāya saṅkhāra. See,
“Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means.”
§ Mano kamma (our spontaneous thoughts) arise automatically according to our gati.
§ Vacī kamma (“talking to ourselves” and speech) arise due to conscious thoughts.
§ Kāya kamma also arise also due to conscious thoughts and have the highest javana power; see,
“Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power.”
§ Many people think “talking to ourselves,” or “day dreaming” is not bad because we don’t
physically do anything. Even though they are less potent than kāya kamma, vacī kamma can
add up and lead to strong kamma vipāka.
11. When we “day dream,” we mostly recall a past event that we enjoyed and re-experience that
again and again. Also, one could make up a “future event” that one would LIKE TO experience and
that also becomes a part of pañcakkhandha (this is the “anāgata” component in #3 above).
§ Then one keeps generating more and more vacī saṅkhāra on that event; see, “Correct Meaning
of Vacī Saṅkhāra.” Of course, if we get “really into it,” we may do kāya saṅkhāra too.
§ That is called “pañcupādānakkhandha” (pañca upādāna khandha). In other words, one is now
“pulling that event back, close to one’s mind” and consciously generating more vacī (and
possibly kāya) saṅkhāra.
§ That is why “upādāna” is such an essential step in a Paṭicca Samuppāda cycle. The two steps
of “taṇhā paccayā upādāna” and “upādāna paccayā bhava” really involves many, many
Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles running inside them.
§ We will discuss this in detail in the next post.
Saññā is, at the very fundamental level, the recognition of an external stimulus. But it is more than
that. We not only recognize that a given object is, say, a dog. But some people may be able to
categorize it as a bull dog. Thus saññā about a particular object depends on the person.
Same is true for other four senses. When we hear a sound, we recognize what it is, say a bird singing
a song. Some may be able to say which bird it is, some may not be. Any smell, taste, or touch works
the same way. Without saññā we cannot identify things around us, and also cannot communicate with
each other meaningfully.
One of the 31 realms of existence is the “Asanna realm”. There, the beings have no saññā or
perception. Thus in principle, those beings are without any awareness. Nothing registers in the mind.
If anyone has attained the 7th jhāna, the “Nevasanna Na’sanna“, then that person knows what it is
like to born in the Asanna realm.
Saññā is described in more detail in, “Saññā – What It Really Means” and “How to Cultivate the
Anicca Saññā“.
In this and follow-up posts, we will discuss six types of vedanā (feelings) and how they arise. There
are other types of vedanā, but these are the important ones to understand for the Sotāpanna stage.
Three of these occur due to kamma vipāka, and the other three arise due to saṅkhāra (defiled
thoughts).
§ Vedanā comes from (“ve” + “danā”) which means “වීම දැනවීම” in Sinhala. That means to
“become aware of something.” When we sense something via our six senses, we become
aware of it; that is vedanā.
Revised September 4, 2016; Revised February 9, 2017; October 17, 2017; November 5, 2018
(Same at Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways
)
1. Vedanā (feelings) due to kamma vipāka are three kinds : Sukha vedanā (pleasant or joyful
feeling), dukha vedanā (unpleasant or painful feeling), and adhukkhama asukha (without being
painful or joyful, just neutral), which is commonly called upekkha.
§ Those sukha vedanā and dukha vedanā are felt only by the body. All vedanā initially
coming through other five sense faculties are neutral.
§ But based on all those, we can generate more types of “mind-made” vedanā called somanassa
and domanassa vedanā as we discuss in the next section below.
2. Kamma vipāka leading to sukha vedanā and dukha vedanā happen to everyone, including
Arahants. While everyone can live mindfully (taking necessary precautions) to avoid some of those
dukha vedanā, there are others that are too strong to be able to avoid.
§ For example, the Buddha himself had physical ailments later in his life as kamma vipāka.
Moggallana Thero was beaten to death because of a bad kamma that he committed many lives
before.
§ However, kamma vipāka are not certain to happen. Some can be reduced in power (see,
“Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“); all are reduced in power with time and some eventually die
out if they do not get a chance to come to fruition within 91 Mahā kalpas.
§ Many can be avoided by not providing conditions for them to arise, i.e., by acting with yoniso
manasikara or just common sense. For example, going out at night in a bad neighborhood is
providing fertile ground for past bad kamma vipāka to take place: We all have done
innumerable kamma (both good and bad) in past lives; if we act with common sense we can
suppress bad kamma vipāka and make conditions for good vipāka to arise.
Also see the discussion on kamma beeja in , “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“.
Now let us look at the “suffering we are initiating at present moment via saṅkhāra“.
(B) Vedanā Arising from Saṅkhāra (“Samphassa ja vedanā“)
We described the PS mechanism that generates this type of vedanā in the previous post. The vedanā
occurs due to attachment via greed or hate, at that moment (i.e., one’s gati); see, “Taṇhā – How We
Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
These are the vedanā (feelings) that Arahants do not feel. Since they do not have any “bad gati“, the
do not commit any (abhi)saṅkhāra, an Arahant avoids any kind of feeling arising from saṅkhāras.
The easiest way to explain this kind of vedanā is to give some examples:
1. Three people are walking down the street. One has ultra-right political bias (A), the second has
ultra-left bias (B), and the third is an Arahant who does not have special feelings for anyone
(C). They all see a famous politician hated by the political right coming their way. It is a given
that the sight of the politician causes A to have displeasure and B to have a pleasurable feeling.
On the other hand, the sight does not cause the Arahant to generate any pleasure or displeasure.
Even though all three see and identify the person, they generate different types of feelings.It
is important to realize that the feelings were created in A and B by themselves.
2. Two friends go looking for treasure and find a gem. They are both overjoyed. It looks quite
valuable and one person kills the other so that he can get all the money. Yet when he tries to
sell the “gem”, he finds out that it was not that valuable. His joy turns to sorrow in an instant.
Nothing had changed in the object. It was the same piece of colored rock. What has changed
was the perception of it.
3. What could happen if an Arahant found the same gem lying on the road? (he would not have
gone looking for one). He might think of donating it to a worthy cause. During the process, if
he found that it was not valuable, he would not have worried about it at all.
4. A loving couple had lived for many years without any problems and were happy to be together.
However, the husband slaps his wife during an argument (this is a kamma vipāka). The
physical pain from the slap itself did not last more than a few minutes. But for how long the
wife would suffer mentally? Those feelings arise due to saṅkhāra, i.e. sadness and of hate.
Even the husband, who did not feel any physical pain, would suffer for days if he really loved
his wife. In both cases, the real mental pain was associated with the attachment to each other.
The wife could have dropped something on her foot and would have suffered about the same
amount of physical pain. But she would not have had any lingering mental pain associated with
that.
5. In all the above cases, the initial sense contact was due to a kamma vipāka; there are no
kamma generated at that instant. However, based on that initial contact, we tend to pursue it
with our mind (thinking about good/bad aspects of the politician, the value of the gem, re-
assessing the love between husband and wife) and thus start generating kamma
automatically, within the same citta vitti; see, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka
Viññāṇa“.
Thus it is clear that in all the above examples, the “extra” happiness or suffering (other than due to
kamma vipāka) arose from within one’s own mind. And taṇhā (attachment via greed or hate) was
the cause of it.
We will discuss more examples as we proceed, but you should think about how to analyze situations
that you face everyday, or have experienced. Let us further analyze the actual words of the Buddha
when he described dukha in the Dhammacakka Pavattana Sutta:
1. It says, “jāti ‘pi dukkhā, jarā ‘pi dukkha, maranan ‘pi dukkha…….”. The deeper meaning is: “birth
is suffering, getting old is suffering, dying is suffering,….”; see, “Essence of Buddhism – In the First
Sutta“.
§ In order to grasp this deeper meaning, one needs to realize that in end. “all types of jāti“ lead to
suffering.
§ The most important point that the Buddha was trying to make in that sutta was that no matter
where one is reborn, that will eventually lead to suffering.
2. However, we can also see another meaning in a “day-to-day” sense: “jāti ‘pi dukkha” is shortened
for the verse; it is “jāti pi dukkha“ or “jāti api dukkha“ depending on the context; the other two
“jarā ‘pi dukkha, maranan ‘pi dukkha” are the same.
§ “pi” in Pāli or “priya” in Sinhala is “like”, and “api” in Pāli or “apriya” in Sinhala is dislike.
Thus, “jāti api dukkha” means “birth of something that is not liked by one causes suffering”.
“Jarā pi dukkha” means, “decay of something that is liked causes suffering”, and “maranan pi
dukkha” means, “Death of a liked causes suffering”. One can look at each case and easily see
which one to use; see #4 below.
3. The reverse is true too: “Birth of something that one likes causes happiness”, “decay of something
that is hated brings happiness” and “death of a hated person brings happiness”.
§ Y ou can think of any example and this is ALWAYS true. It brings happiness to many people to
hear about the destruction of a property of an enemy . Many people were happy to hear about
the death of Bin Laden, except his followers who became sad.
§ In the end, all types jāti eventually lead to dukkha. But that is a deeper point.
4. The Buddha further clarified “pi” and “api” in the next verse, where he explicitly said: “piyehi
vippayogo dukkho, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho” means “it brings sorrow when a loved one has to
depart, and it also brings sorrow to be with a hated person” (“piya” is same as “pi“, and “apiya” is
same as “api“).
§ We all know the truth of this first hand. When a man dies of in a plane crash, it causes great
suffering to his family; less to his distant relatives; even less to those who just know him
informally; and for someone at the other end of country who has had no association with him, it
is “just some news”.
5. Thus all these feelings arise due to taṇhā, some form of attachment: greed (craving, liking) or
hate (dislike); all these are due to mano saṅkhāra. The feelings (or rather the perceptions that give
rise to feelings) reside INSIDE oneself. It does not come from outside. We use external things to
CAUSE happiness or suffering by our own volition.
§ There is no inherent suffering or happiness in ANYTHING external; the sense contact with
an external thing CAUSES suffering or happiness depending on our gati and āsavas. An
Arahant, who has removed all āsavas, will be free of such emotional responses.
6. Now this DOES NOT MEAN we should not love our family or friends. These associations did not
come without a cause. We cannot eliminate the cause for the current life; it was done long ago. Now
we have fulfill the obligations that resulted from the cause in the past, i.e., we cannot give up our
families. We have families, children etc, BECAUSE we have debts to pay to each other; see,
“Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
§ What we need to do is to eliminate NEW causes: stop such relationships from formed in future
births, i.e., work to stop the rebirth process, while making sure to fulfill our obligations.
7. Here again, many people freak out: “how can I do that? if I do not reborn what happens to me?”
We have this mindset because we do not think life can be much worse than what we have. But it
definitely can be much, much worse; see, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the
Human Realm“.
§ It is not possible to comprehend this fact without fully understanding the “world view” of
the Buddha by looking at the wider world of 31 realms and the process of rebirth.
§ However, anyone can start on the Path without getting into the question of where there is a
rebirth process or not; see, the section “Living Dhamma“.
8. It is also clear how accumulation of saṅkhāra via paṭicca samuppāda leads to such varied feelings:
If we attach to something with a “like” or a “dislike”, we generate a mindset accordingly. This is
paṭicca samuppāda (pati + ichcha leading to sama + uppada; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
Introduction“).
§ In the first case, we generate “positive” mindset towards the object that we liked; thus if
everything goes well with the object, we feel happy and if things do not go well, we feel sad. It
is the other way for the object that we had a bad impression in the first encounter; we made a
negative mindset about the object.
§ In either case, the strength of the feeling is also proportional to the strength of the “like” or
“dislike”: Sama uppada or samuppāda means both in quality and quantity; the higher the
strength of “pati + ichcha”, the higher the strength in “sama + uppada“.
§ This is how we form habits (“gati“) too. A teenager tasting alcohol with a bunch of friends gets
attached to that setting and looks forward to have the same experience again; the more he
repeats, the more he gets “bonded”, and thus forms a drinking habit. See, “Habits and Goals”
and “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“.
9. Thus all what we experience arise in a complex web of inter-related multiple factors. Only a
Buddha can “see this whole picture” and condense it down to a form that can be comprehended by
only a motivated human being.
§ If one really wants to understand Buddha Dhamma, one needs to spend time contemplating on
these multiple but impressively self-consistent key ideas of anicca, dukkha, anatta, and paṭicca
samuppāda.
The vipāka cycles of PS are described in, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
Also see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“, ………..
The sequel to this post is at, “Feelings: Sukha, Dukha, Somanassa, and Domanassa“.
A deeper discussion on vedanā at: “Does Bodily Pain Arise Only Due to Kamma Vipāka?“.
3.6.6 Viññāṇa (Defiled Consciousness)
Originally written in 2014; re-written September 8, 2018; revised December 25, 2018
Viññāṇa is normally translated as consciousness or awareness. But it is much deeper and can be many
different types. An overview is given below, and there are several posts on different types of viññāṇa
in different sections at the website.
§ Viññāṇa is very complex and is the key to Nibbāna. One should read the posts referred below;
more posts can be found by using the “Search box” on top right.
§ First, it is very important to get a basic understanding of Pāli terms like citta, viññāṇa, and
nāma gotta: “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” and “The Amazing Mind –
Critical Role of Nāmagotta (Memories)“.
Six Types of Viññāṇa
1. There are six types of viññāṇa corresponding to the six sense inputs (vision, hearing, taste, smell,
touch, mind): cakkhu, sota, jivha, gandha, kāya, and mano viññāṇa.
§ When we experience a sense input (say, see an object), we get a happy, unhappy, or neutral
feeling (vedanā), recognize it (saññā), and automatically generate mano saṅkhāra.
§ Viññāṇa provides the overall sense experience that includes vedanā, saññā, and saṅkhāra. Those
latter three combined is called “nāma“.
§ However, in addition to just providing a “sense experience” (which is all “nāma“), viññāṇa can
also act as the bridge between “nāma” and “rūpa” to “nāmarūpa“. These nāmarūpa are the seeds
for the creation of matter (rūpa). That is a separate type of viññāṇa — called kamma viññāṇa —
as we discuss now.
Two Types of Viññāṇa –Vipāka Viññāṇa and Kamma Viññāṇa
2. Vipāka viññāṇa is awareness: when one “sees” something that is cakkhu viññāṇa; when one smells
something that is a ghāṇa viññāṇa, etc; there are 6 types of vipāka viññāṇa that arise when sense
inputs come through the 6 sense doors (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, touch, and the mind). These are the
six types listed above in #1.
§ The second major type is kamma viññāṇa or defiled viññāṇa. This is the more important
one. These kamma viññāṇa are basically kamma beeja that are responsible for future vipāka
viññāṇa (via kamma vipāka) AND even future births.
§ It is to be noted that kamma viññāṇa are included in the category of mano viññāṇa, i.e., kamma
viññāṇa arise in the mind without going through the five physical sense doors. Therefore, mano
viññāṇa can be vipāka viññāṇa or kamma viññāṇa.
3. Kamma viññāṇa are created via our defiled thoughts (saṅkhāra) which are three types: mano, vacī,
and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ When we automatically generate thoughts due to a sense input those are mano saṅkhāra; then
we consciously think about it and may even talk out loud about it (with vacī saṅkhāra); if we
really get engaged, we may physical do things (with kāya saṅkhāra); see, “Saṅkhāra – What It
Really Means“.
§ It is also important to realize that “talking/thinking to oneself silently” without speaking is
included in vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
4. We can see that what is called the “awareness” or “consciousness” is really vipāka viññāṇa; it is
one’s experience at a given moment.
§ On the other hand, kamma viññāṇa is what is called the “subconscious”. It is a hope or
desire that lies hidden and come to the surface from time to time. For example, if we are
planning to buy a car, that idea (hope/desire) remains in our subconscious. When we see a car
like the one that we want to buy, that viññāṇa is “awakened” and we start thinking about it. But
once we buy the car, that viññāṇa will be gone, i.e., we will not think about it anymore.
§ We are reborn mainly because we have the desire to live and enjoy life. But we do not get our
exact wish most of the time; if we do dasa akusala to get what we want in this life, we are
likely to be born in the apayas, regardless of what we wish for.
Mechanisms for Generating Vipāka Viññāṇa and Kamma Viññāṇa
5. Kamma Viññāṇa are generated in paṭicca samuppāda cycles; see, “Paṭicca Samuppada“. As we
saw above, kamma viññāṇa arise due to saṅkhāra: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa“.
§ Therefore, we accumulate such kamma viññāṇa by doing (abhi) saṅkhāra due to our ignorance
(that striving to get sense pleasures can lead to a long-lasting happiness), i.e., we do not
comprehend the anicca nature.
6. Vipāka viññāṇa arise via six ways due to sense inputs via the six sense faculties: “cakkhuñca
paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“, “sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati
sotaviññāṇaṃ“,…”manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“.
§ In English, that means we see an object when our eyes capture light coming from that object;
we hear a sound that comes our ears, …we get a thought in our mind.
§ An example of a mano viññāṇa is, for example, something that happened in a previous day just
popping into the mind.
§ This process of the arising of the six types of viññāṇa is discussed in, “Do I Have “A Mind”
That Is Fixed and “Mine”?“.
Based on Vipāka Viññāṇa, We Initiate Kamma Viññāṇa
7. Everything that we INITIALLY EXPERIENCE is due to a kammā vipāka, i.e., it comes to us as a
vipāka viññāṇa. They make us see, hear, smell, taste, experience bodily sensations, and bring in new
thoughts to the mind.
§ Based on those sense inputs, we MAY initiate new kamma viññāṇa if those sense inputs are
either attractive (leading to greed) or repulsive (leading to hate/anger). This happens via
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” as mentioned above.
8. If we start doing saṅkhāra consciously, then we start generating NEW kamma via the process,
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“. Then we would give rise to new kamma viññāṇa. If those
abhisaṅkhāra are strong enough, those kamma viññāṇa can give rise to a special type of vipāka
viññāṇa called paṭisandhi viññāṇa (responsible for rebirth).
§ A paṭisandhi viññāṇa, which is the state of mind at the moment of grasping a new bhava (new
existence) is a vipāka viññāṇa; we cannot control it.
§ Patisandhi viññāṇa is A RESULT of a past kamma that we did with a kamma viññāṇa at the
time of doing that kamma. For example, someone kills a human being with a kamma viññāṇa,
and that gives rise to a kamma beeja (kammic energy). That kamma beeja can bring in a vipāka
viññāṇa in the form of a paṭisandhi viññāṇa in the future.
9. This vicious cycle of “vipāka” leading to “kammā” leading to more “vipāka” is the process that
binds us to the sansara of endless rebirths, with (mostly) suffering.
§ The Buddha describes this as, “kammā vipākā vaddanti, vipāko kamma sambhavo, tasmā
punabbhavo hoti, evan loko pavattati“.
§ That means, “kammā lead to vipāka, vipāka in turn lead to kammā and thus to rebirth
(punabbhavo), and that is how the world (existence) is maintained”.
§ There, “sambhava” is “san” + “bhava“, or “adding more existences”. Also, “loka” is world, and
“pavatta” means “maintain”.
10. Breaking this vicious cycle is the key to Nibbāna, as we point out next.
“Yam kiñci dukkham sambhoti, Sabbam viññānapaccayā” (“Whatever suffering that arises, It
arises due to viññāṇa“)
11. There are many suttās that clearly state that Nibbāna is attained by stopping the arising of
viññāṇa (defiled consciousness), i.e., via “viññāṇa nirodha“. A clear statement can be found in the
“Dvayatānupassanāsutta (Sutta Nipata 3.12)“:
“Yaṃ kiñci dukkhaṃ sambhoti,
Sabbaṃ viññāṇapaccayā;
Viññāṇassa nirodhena,
Natthi dukkhassa sambhavo“.
Translated: “Whatever suffering that arises, all that arises due to viññāṇa; With cessation (not
arising) of viññāṇa, there is no existence with suffering “.
§ The viññāṇa referred to here is kamma viññāṇa. For a discussion, see, “Viññāṇa – What It
Really Means“.
12. Of course the way to stop kamma viññāṇa from arising is to stop doing abhisaṅkhāra, i.e., stop
kamma viññāṇa in the step, “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“That involves two steps:
§ First, one needs to cultivate paññā and get rid of avijjā, so that “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step
can be avoided. One needs to comprehend the anicca, dukkha, anatta, asubha nature of this
world.
§ Secondly, one also needs to be mindful and stop such abhisaṅkhāra from arising to stop the
rebirth process or even to stop bad kamma vipāka in the future.
§ Both those two steps are essential; they feed on each other. The more one understands the
anicca nature, it is easier to stop such abhisaṅkhāra AND the more abhisaṅkhāra one stops, it
becomes easier to comprehend anicca nature.
Key Points to Remember
13. Kamma viññāṇa are saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) that we create ourselves; they are also called
“kamma beeja“. We create them by doing mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra due to our ignorance. That
process is described by paṭicca samuppāda.
§ We can stop generating kamma viññāṇa by being mindful and not doing abhisaṅkhāra,
especially apuñña abhisaṅkhāra or immoral deeds.
14. The type of rebirth (or other kamma vipāka) that arise due to those abhisaṅkhāra are described by
paticcca samuppāda: they are according to the type of abhisaṅkhāra done: “pati icca leading to sama
uppāda“; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ Then they bring vipāka or results in the future via vipāka viññāṇa. As long as one lives, one
will experience those vipāka viññāṇa, even if one is an Arahant.
§ However, an Arahant will not grasp a new bhava at the moment of death (at the cuit-paṭisandhi
moment), because the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step will not work for an Arahant: He/she will
not grasp any bhava, i.e., no upādāna.
15. This is a highly condensed overview. Don’t be discouraged if you cannot understand some things.
One needs to spend some time reading relevant posts and contemplating on them. Any questions can
be discussed at the discussion forum: “Forums“.
3.6.7 Rūpa (Material Form)
§ These are: visible (vanna) rūpa, sound (sadda) rūpa, smell (gandha) rūpa, taste (rasa) rūpa,
and tangible rūpa (pottabbha). There are no separate rūpas called pottabbha rūpa; they are
patavi, tejo, and vāyo, three of the four great elements (mahā bhūta). Thus things we see with
our eyes are the visible (vanna) rūpas; they are only part of the class of rūpa.
§ It is important to note that the gocara rūpa or objective rūpa are the only rūpa that we
EXPERIENCE with our five physical senses. For example the remaining great essential, āpo, is
not experienced by our senses.
§ The five pasada rūpa and the seven gocara rūpa that are sensed by them are collectively called
the olarika (gross or coarse) rūpas because they can touch (strike) each other. The other 16
rūpas are subtle or fine (sukhuma) rūpa.
3. There are several fine rūpas that are associated with our body.
§ Hadaya vatthu (heart base) – together with the five pasada rūpa — are located close to the
heart.
§ Jivitindriya rūpa (vital force of kammaja rūpa) is spread throughout the body.
§ There are two bhava rūpas that determine whether it is a male or a female: itthi bhava
(femininity) and purisa bhava (masculinity). One kind is spread throughout a body.
§ Āhāra rūpa (oja) are nutritive essence that sustains the body. It is extracted from the food we
eat.
4. So far we have discussed five pasada rūpas, seven rūpas that constitute the external rūpa (vanna,
sadda, rasa, gandha, patavi, tejo, vāyo) that are sensed by the pasada rūpa, and the five other rūpa
(hadaya, jivitindriya, two bhava rūpa, and oja) in #3.
5. The remaining mahā bhūta or the great element is āpo. It is the rūpa that holds any structure
together, but it is not sensed by the body (kaya) rūpa. With the āpo rūpa, up to this point we have
discussed 18 types of rūpa. These 18 types of rūpa are called nippanna rūpa (concretely produced
rūpa) because they are caused and conditioned by one or more of four things: kamma, citta, utu
(tejo) and āhāra (food); thus they are suitable for contemplation by insight.
§ The five pasada rūpa, two bhava rūpa, hadaya vatthu and jivitindriya rūpa (9 in all) are
produced by kamma and kamma alone.
§ Sadda (sound) rūpa are produced by citta and utu (tejo). Vocal sounds such as speech, laughter,
whistling, etc are produced by citta. Non-vocal sounds, such as thunder and music from
instruments are produced by utu.
§ The different ways that kamma, citta, utu, and āhāra produce the 24 types of rūpa is
summarized in the Tables and Summaries Section; see, “Rūpa – Generation Mechanisms“.
6. The remaining 10 rūpa are more abstract in nature. They are called anippana rūpa (non-
concretely produced rūpa).
§ Akasa dhathu (space element) is not so much “space”, but more like the inter-atomic space or
intra-atomic space. It occupies whatever is not occupied by any other rūpa. Thus it is
everywhere, even in the deep inter-galactic space where there is no “detectable matter”.
Scientists are beginning to suspect that there is much more energy in the vacuum (zero point
energy) than the energy that we experience. It is like the deep ocean and what we see are only
the ripples.
§ We communicate using two fine rūpas: vinnatti rūpa or material qualities of communication.
We use both the mouth and and the body to communicate with each other. Kaya vinnatti
(bodily intimation) is gestures by hand, head, physical eye, leg, etc, to indicate one’s intentions
to another. Vacī vinnatti (vocal intimation) is the movement of the mouth to produce vocal
speech.
§ There are three vikara (mutable) rūpa that helps with the movements of the body. The lahuta
(lightness or buoyancy) rūpa suppresses the heaviness of a body. This make it possible for up
jump, for example. Imagine trying to toss up an equivalent weight! Muduta (elasticity) removes
the stiffness in the body. Kammannata (weildiness) gives strength to hold up body parts. All
these make possible our body movements.
§ Finally, there are four lakkhana (material qualities) rūpa that are common characteristics of all
rūpas: Upacaya and santati rūpa are associated with the arising of a rūpa, jarata rūpa is
associated with the decay, and aniccata rūpa is the dissolving stage. See the lifetime discussed
below.
7. The four great elements (mahā bhūta) are the primary rūpa. Each of the four has its own character:
patavi element of hardness; the āpo element of fluidity and cohesion; tejo of heat; vāyo of motion and
pressure.
8. The mahā bhūta can never be detected separately. The eight rūpa of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, are
always found together with vanna, gandha, rasa, oja in inseparable units called pure octads or
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], which are the fundamental units of matter. These eight rūpas are
inseparable and indivisible, and thus are known as avinibbhoga rūpa; for an in-depth discussion see,
“The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]”
9. It is not necessary to memorize all these details about different rūpa. But it is good to have
reference base to look up if needed. Abhidhamma goes to much more detail, and shows how the mind
energy can form different kinds of rūpa.
If you have not read about saṅkhāra (the remaining one of the five aggregates):
“Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Vipāka, Kamma Beeja“, ……
3.6.8 Pañcakkhandha or Five Aggregates – A Misinterpreted Concept
First of all, many people have the impression that rūpakkhandha is one’s own body OR that
pañcakkhandha are “in one’s own body”. The problem with this critical mistake can be seen with the
description of rūpakkhandha (and other four khandha as 11 types).
§ Even though it does not explain the concept as discussed above, one can see the 11 components
of each khandha are clearly there. Also, note that it is NOT Skandha sutta; it is Khandha sutta.
This is why I say that skandha is a WRONG TERM.
2. Now we can see yet again that Buddha Dhamma has become so contaminated over the past
thousands of years. Fortunately, we still have the Tipiṭaka in close to original form. The Buddha
stated that his Buddha Sasana will last for 5000 years, and the way he made sure that will happen,
was to compose the suttas as I described in the post, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Furthermore, abhidhamma and vinaya sections, as well as three original commentaries, are still
intact in the Tipiṭaka; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma” and other posts in “Historical
Background“.
§ The main problem even with the Theravada version of “Buddhism” is that instead of using the
Tipiṭaka as the basis, the tendency is to use the Visuddhimagga written by Buddhaghosa, who
had not attained any magga phala and stated that his “wish” was to become a deva in the next
life from the merits he gained by writing Visuddhimagga!
§ Even when using the Tipiṭaka, most people use the wrong interpretations of key words such as
anicca, dukkha, anatta, as well as khandha, and paṭicca samuppāda. This problem is apparent
in the Sinhala translation of the Tipiṭaka, that was done with the sponsorship of the Sri Lankan
government several years ago.
§ It is sometimes erroneously called pancaskhandha, and I will explain why that is not correct.
2. For example, there is a huge difference between rūpa (material form) and rūpa khandha, the
aggregate of material form. Rūpa khandha is commonly written as rūpakkhandha by connecting the
two terms to one word, by adding an extra “k” (a common way of connecting words or “sandhi” in
Pāli). The same is true for other four aggregates. The correct interpretation makes many other
concepts easier to understand.
§ Rūpa is matter (and energy) and is made of the satara mahā bhūta (patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo) and
their derivatives.
§ Rūpa khandha is all MENTAL.
§ Similarly, there is a difference between vedanā (feelings) and vedanakkhandha (the aggregate
of feelings), even though here both kinds are mental; we will discuss the difference below. The
other three khandha of saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa are similar to that of vedanā.
§ This is very important to understand, and I will proceed slowly to make the concepts clear.
3. The key in clarifying what rūpakkhandha is to examine why the Buddha added “khandha” to rūpa.
He could have labelled past rūpa, future rūpa, sukuma rūpa, olarika rūpa, etc. to describe the 11
types of them as discussed above. What was the need to add “khandha“? That is because
rūpakkhandha is all MENTAL, and to see how it comes about we need to examine how each of us
experience “the world”. Each of us does it differently.
§ Each person has his/her own rūpakkhandha or the way he/she perceives the material rūpa in the
world. That rūpakkhandha has associated with it other four khandhas and thus comprise the
pañcakkhandha. And panca upadanakkhandha, or what one has cravings for, is a small part of
that.
§ Just like the concept of anicca, this again is a very important concept to understand, so please
try to read through slowly at a quiet time and grasp the concepts. As the Buddha said, “at the
end what matters is understanding a concept, not memorizing words”.
§ When I first grasped this concept, it was like turning the lights on in a previously dark area that
I did not even know existed! This is a good example of what the Buddha meant by “aloko
udapādi“.
What is a Khandha?
1. One of the main problems we have today is that many key terms in use are in Sanskrit rather than
original Pāli. The meanings get distorted. A good example is paṭicca samuppāda, for which the
Sanskrit term is pratittyasamutpada, which does not convey the meaning; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
2. Similarly, the Sanskrit term “skandha” is commonly used in the place of khandha, the original Pāli
term. Khandha is a heap and the Sinhala term is kanda, which is even used today to denote a heap or
a pile.
§ When we experience the world, we do that with our six senses, and that experience is registered
as thoughts (citta). But a single citta is born and gone in a small fraction of a second. What we
EXPERIENCE are the aggregates of numerous citta that go through our minds even in a
fraction of a second.
§ We experience a rūpa (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, dhamma) with a citta AND based on
that generate mental qualities of vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa. In each citta, the mind
analyzes all these, and that citta is gone in a fraction of a second.
§ The manasikara cetasika that is in each citta puts together the contents in all these “packets” —
including our past impressions — and provides us with an overall experience that includes a
“sketch of what we see, hear, ..”, and those feelings, perceptions etc that arise due to that sense
impression.
§ This can be compared to the process of connecting individual links in a metal chain. In the old
days, blacksmiths used to make chains by manually connecting one link to the next by hand. He
can only see himself linking two of them at a time, but if he looked back he could see the whole
chain that is being made. In the same way, the five aggregates or heaps keep building up
with each passing second.
3. In another example, it is like a movie recording that keeps recording non-stop from our birth to
death. And when we die it does not stop, it just start recording the new life. And these five heaps or
aggregates that have accumulated over ALL previous lives are in the namagotta, a permanent record;
see, “The Amazing Mind – Critical Role of Nāmagotta (Memories)“.
§ Of course, we remember only a fraction of it, even for the present life. But some people
remember more things than others; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records
(HSAM)“.
§ But we also make plans about the future. And those heaps about the future are also in the
pañcakkhandha, but not in the namagotta, which only has records of what has already
happened. As soon as the present moment goes by, more of the five heaps are added to the
namagotta.
§ Thus pañcakkhandha includes past, present, and future, whereas namagotta includes only that
portion of the pañcakkhandha that has gone to the past.
§ Even though I have discussed these concepts in the introductory posts in the Abhidhamma
section, here I will go through a simpler version to get the ideas across. Those who are
interested, can then review the posts in Abhidhamma section as well; see, “Essential
Abhidhamma – The Basics“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 269
Animation Video
1. Just to give the flavor of what happens, we can look at what happens when we watch a movie. The
movie is a series of static pictures or frames. When making a movie, what is actually done is to take
many static pictures and then play them back at fast enough speed. If the playback speed is too slow,
we can see individual pictures, but above a certain “projection rate”, it looks like real motion. Here is
a video that illustrates this well:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Animation basics: The optical illusion of motion
2. When we experience (see, hear,…) the outside world, what happens is very similar to the above. At
the end of the video it is stated that the “movie” we see is an illusion, and as the Buddha explained,
that holds for real life as well. In real life when we see someone coming towards us, what we
actually see is a series of “static pictures” or citta projected at a very fast rate in our minds, giving us
the illusion of a “movie like experience”.
§ Even though in the above video it is suggested that all the information from the “previous static
frames” were put together by the brain, that is true only to a certain extent.
§ The brain does put together the individual frames, but without actual “memories” it is not
possible to get the deep details about what is seen.
§ We not only “see” the video, but we also RECOGNIZE what is seen (we identify a given actor,
we can even remember previous movies with that actor, we KNOW all about the scenes in the
background, etc); to have all that information instantly available to the brain is not possible.
This is a point that needs a lot of thought.
§ What happens according to Abhidhamma, is that the brain periodically sends packets of
acquired data put together by the cortex in the brain to the hadaya vatthu, which is basically the
seat of the mind. There citta vīthi arise in accepting that information from the brain, and it is the
mind that does all the compiling (with the help of the manasikara and cetana cetasika) and that
is how we EXPERIENCE any sense input.
§ For those who are interested in more details, see, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa
(Consciousness) Arises“.
3. When the mind analyzes those packets of information sent by the brain with cittas, it generates
feelings (vedanā), perception (saññā), and follow-up thoughts (viññāṇa); if the mind likes/dislikes
that sense input it may decide to act on it by generating saṅkhāra.
§ Thus we can see that depending on the nature of the sense input, the mind will generate a
“packet” of vedanā (i.e., vadanakkhandha), a “packet” of saññā (sannakkhandha), a “packet”
of saṅkhāra (sankharakkhandha), a “packet” of viññāṇa (vinnanakkhandha) , in addition to the
rūpakkhandha that was involved in the sense input. Actually all these five khandhas are
generated within the same series of citta.
1. Thus our experiences are stored in five type of “heaps” (rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa)
in the mental plane (manothalaya). Some of these “clips” or “packets” from those five heaps or
aggregates can be recalled and played back in our minds just like a movie is played back on a screen.
When we do that we can recall that particular experience with sights, sounds, etc.
§ It is the sum of all such packets of a given kind that is called a khandha, for example, a
rūpakkhandha. All these are our memory records of what we see, hear, smell, taste, touch, and
also think.
§ The ability to recall past experiences, we call memory. Some have better memories than others.
There are some people who can “playback” basically one’s life day-by-day for many years into
the past; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)“. It is amazing to see
how much they can recall.
§ Yet, one can recall not only memories from this life, but also from past lives by developing
abhiññā powers. Thus the Buddha Gotama was able to describe in vivid detail the scene, eons
ago, when the Buddha Deepankara stated that he was to become a Buddha in the future.
§ But let us get back to the main discussion.
2. The brain analyzes multiple sense inputs of different kinds in a second. When we watch a movie,
we see the picture, hear the sounds, and if we are eating popcorn we can smell and taste popcorn too;
see, “What is a Thought?“. Even if you are not familiar with Abhidhamma, you can get a good idea of
what happens by reading that post. Just try to get the overall picture of what happens instead of trying
to analyze in detail.
§ Thus our perception of an object is due to the sum of many thoughts (cittas) that arise per
second. And each citta has “embedded in it”, our feelings (vedanā), perceptions (saññā), our
decisions on how to act (saṅkhāra), and our overall sense experience (viññāṇa). In the case of a
visual, auditory, … event, we also have the corresponding “imprints of them” in our mind.
§ In other words, all our sense experiences can be described by five heaps or khandhas. The
totality of our experience or “our world” is panca khandha (pañcakkhandha). And it has
nothing to do with our physical bodies.
§ Thus it is important to understand that “rūpa” can used in the sense of “matter” and also in the
sense of “records of those material rūpa“.
3. These mental components are what the Buddha called khandhas. Rūpakkhandha does not include
actual material objects, sounds, smells, tastes, or touches. Rather rūpa khandha includes only the
mental records or imprints of those sense inputs.
§ During our life, we continuously accumulate such khandhas or bundles of heaps of sense
imprints. Thus a rūpa khandha or rūpakkhandha (note how the two words were connected by
inserting an additional “k”) is not actual rūpa, but our mental images of such rūpa.
§ Similarly, we keep accumulating bundles of vedanā (vedanakkhandha), saññā
(sannakkhandha), saṅkhāra (sankharakkhandha), and viññāṇa (vinnanakkhandha).
4. In fact, these khandhas are all that we have ever experienced, and would like to experience in the
future. The five khandhas encompass our (changing) identity, and our sense of the whole world out
there. They have embedded in them all our past experiences and also future hopes.
§ This is what was meant by saying that pancakkhadha (the five aggregates) is our whole world.
§ And these records can go back to beginningless time! Some people can recall more past records
than others, but by gradually developing abhiññā powers, one can recall more and more past
lives.
1. This is clearly described in many suttas, even though the true meaning has been hidden all these
years. In particular, the Khandha sutta summarizes what is included in each aggregate.
§ Eleven types of rūpa (mental impressions) are in the rūpakkhandha: past, present, future, near,
far, fine (sukuma), coarse (olarika), likes (paneeta), dislikes (appaneeta), internal (ajjatta), and
external (bahidda). Here internal rūpa means (impressions) of one’s own body parts, and
external rūpa are (impressions) of external objects.
§ Thus, it is quite clear that rūpakkhandha encompasses anything that we ever saw (including
previous births), we are seeing now, and hope to see in the future. The record of what belongs
to the past is permanent and is called namagotta. Any rūpa about the future (for example, a
sketch of the type of house one is thinking about building) can change with time.
§ Other four khandhas have the same 11 types.
§ A short version of the Khandha sutta is available online: WebLink: accesstoinsight.org:
Khandha Sutta: Aggregates
§ Even though it does not explain the concept as discussed above, one can see the 11 components
of each khandha are clearly there. Also, note that it is NOT Skandha sutta; it is Khandha sutta.
This is why I say that skandha is a WRONG TERM.
2. Now we can see yet again that Buddha Dhamma has become so contaminated over the past
thousands of years. Fortunately, we still have the Tipiṭaka in close to original form. The Buddha
stated that his Buddha Sāsana will last for 5000 years, and the way he made sure that will happen,
was to compose the suttas as I described in the post, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Furthermore, abhidhamma and vinaya sections, as well as three original commentaries, are still
intact in the Tipiṭaka; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma” and other posts in “Historical
Background“.
§ The main problem even with the Theravāda version of “Buddhism” is that instead of using the
Tipiṭaka as the basis, the tendency is to use the Visuddhimagga written by Buddhaghosa, who
had not attained any magga phala and stated that his “wish” was to become a deva in the next
life from the merits he gained by writing Visuddhimagga!
§ Even when using the Tipiṭaka, most people use the wrong interpretations of key words such as
anicca, dukkha, anatta, as well as khandha, and paṭicca samuppāda. This problem is apparent
in the Sinhala translation of the Tipiṭaka, that was done with the sponsorship of the Sri Lankan
government several years ago.
Part 2: Pancupādānakkhandha – It is All Mental
Rūpa and Rūpakkhandha are two different things. There are rūpa made up of “physical matter
” (suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]) in the rūpa loka. Rūpakkhandha consists of each person’s
memories, hopes, and desires for some of the rūpa in the rūpa loka. Since the other four khandha
(vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa) are all mental anyway, all five are MENTAL.
1. In the previous post, “Pañcakkhandha or Five Aggregates – A Misinterpreted Concept“, we
discussed a deeper meaning of the pañca khandha or the five heaps or the five aggregates that define
a given living being. Each person’s pañca khandha or the “world” is different from another’s.
§ Of course, in the 31 realms of existence there are rūpa, or material (and energy). But our
experiences are all mental (which also has energy). Please read the previous post again if you
think rūpakkhandha is material. Rūpakkhandha consists of our thoughts, memories,
perceptions, desires, etc. on rūpa that we have experienced, are experiencing now, and
hope to experience in the future. We have those “imprints of rūpa” in our minds even if we
cannot recall all of them.
§ We experience the “material world” only at the “present time” (in a citta vīthi), then it is gone.
We actually experience not a single citta — or even a single citta vīthi — but the overall effect
of many citta vīthi that run in the blink of an eye.
2. This “overall experience of seeing” within a short time is what we actually call seeing (ditta).
Same for hearing (suta). For the other three physical senses (muta), it can be there as long as we are
actually experiencing them.
§ For example, when we are eating a meal, the sense contact is there until we finish eating. When
we have a headache (an actual dukha vedanā) or while getting a massage (an actual sukha
vedanā), the sense experience is there for a while.
§ But thinking about them (vinnāta) — via the sixth sense, the mind — can be experienced at any
time; we can recall a past experience or conjure up an enticing future experience.
§ Ditta, suta, muta, vinnata include everything that we experience. They are re-categorized as
rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa or the five heaps.
§ It is not necessary to memorize terms like ditta, suta, muta, vinnata. I am merely naming them
to avoid any confusion, since those terms are in the suttas. With time, one will remember.
3. Upādāna (“upa” + “ādāna” where “upa” means “close” and “ādāna” means “pull”) means “pull
and keep close”. One tries to pull and keep close only things that one really desires: pañca upādāna
khandha or pañcaupādānakkhandha. We can translate the term, pañcaupādānakkhandha, as “five
clinging aggregates”.
§ Thus out of an infinite variety of “things (material and mental)” one has experienced (not only
in this life, but in all of existence countless rebirths) — pañcakkhandha –, those that one really
have bonding with, and have the desire to “keep close” are pañca upādāna khandha or
pañcaupādānakkhandha. It is important to realize that “rūpakkhandha” is mental too; see,
“Difference Between Rūpa and Rūpakkhandha“. Same for the other four khandhas.
§ Thus pañcaupādānakkhandha is what we desire, and is ALL MENTAL too. It is a small
fraction of pañcakkhandha.
4. First, let us dig a bit deeper into the concept of pañca khandha (five heaps) or pañcakkhandha.
Then one can see connections to other concepts at a deeper level.
§ As we recall, the five heaps include everything that one has experienced (rūpa, vedanā, saññā,
saṅkhāra, viññāṇa) in the past, one is experiencing right now, and one hopes to experience in
the future and in each of these three categories, they can be subdivided into other categories
like paneeta (likes) and appaneeta (dislikes); see the previous post.
§ Since each person’s experience is unique, one’s pañcakkhandha is unique, and is different from
that of another living being. That is because even if the external rūpa are the same, the mental
impressions are different.
5. A new born baby, does not have much of an experience in this life (other than some while in the
womb). But he/she still have an infinite things from the past in those five heaps or aggregates.
§ As the baby grows, its pañcakkhandha grows each day, adding to the five heaps not only with
what is experienced, but also expectations and desires about the future.
§ We, of course, remember only a fraction of what is in our pañcakkhandha even from our
present life. Each day, we experience many things and forget most of it by the next day.
6. However, some of deeper desires and habits and character remain, sometimes even unknown to us,
beneath the surface as our gathi and āsavas (by the way, those will be reflected in the cetasika that
automatically arise with our citta). As that baby grows, depending on its parents, friends, and other
environmental factors, some of those (good and bad) gathi resurface and even grow.
§ This is why each person is good at some things. If one has musical talent from the past lives,
that child can flourish in an environment that provides suitable conditions. If that baby grows in
a family that does not provide “a musical environment”, then that gathi is kept hidden.
§ Similarly, one who had the tendency to like alcohol, may be kept out of that habit in a family
environment that looks down upon drinking. We can think about zillion other character features
that can be suppressed or brought to surface to flourish depending on the environment.
§ This is why some people, who have not shown any talent for anything for many years, suddenly
“take off and thrive” in a new venture. Stated in another way, one may not realize that “one has
upādāna” for certain things, unless exposed to it.
§ We all have good and bad things that we have “upādāna” for. We should stay away from bad
ones (forcibly if needed to) and find and cultivate good ones. This is why parent and teachers
can play a big role in a child’s future.
§ Eventually, we need to lose “upādāna” for everything, but that comes much later in the Path
when one has attained the Anāgāmī stage, or at least the Sakadāgāmī stage of Nibbāna. First we
need to lose “upādāna” for the highly immoral activities. At the Sotāpanna stage, one realizes
the perils of “upādāna” for only the worst habits that makes one eligible to be born in the
apāyas. It is a gradual process.
7. The tendency to recreate past experiences and future desires need to be clearly distinguished from
the ABILITY TO RECALL past experiences. The Buddha was able to recall things that happened
trillions of years ago, but did not either enjoy them or had a revulsion to them.
§ As we discussed in the section, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“, kāma (or more precisely kāma
rāga) is the tendency to enjoy such mind-made pleasures from the past or future.
§ Each person’s set of pañca upādāna khandha has embedded in them the certain types of things
and events they give priority to, i.e., one’s gathi and anusaya. They automatically come out as
particular set of cetasika (hate and fearlessness of doing immoral things, for example) in our
citta or thoughts.
§ Those kāma rāga that correspond to gathi in the apāyas can lead to rebirth in the apāyas.
§ Rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga are the tendencies to enjoy jhānic pleasures corresponding to rūpa
and arūpa realms.
8. Thus now we can see Nibbāna in terms of pañcaupādānakkhandha. As one sheds “upādāna” for
gathi corresponding to the apāyas, higher kāma loka, and rūpa or arūpa loka successively, one
attains the Sotāpanna, Anāgāmī (via Sakadāgāmī stage), and the Arahant stage respectively.
§ As one keeps shedding layers of pañcaupādānakkhandha, one proceeds to higher stages of
Nibbāna, and upon attaining the Arahant stage loses all “upādāna” and thus
pañcaupādānakkhandha. However, the pañcakkhandha remains, and upon the death all of it
will stay in the nāma loka as nāma gotta.
§ Thus anyone with sufficient abhiññā powers can examine those nāma gotta. That is how the
Buddha Gotama described the lives of many previous Buddhas, and we learn about them today.
9. Unless one has attained the Sotāpanna stage, it is possible for “apāya gathi” to come to the surface
(as cetasika like greed, shamelessness in doing immoral things, etc in our citta or thoughts),
especially under extreme conditions. We all have been in the apāyas uncountable times, so it is not
something to be speculated; we have had those gathi, and it is possible that they can resurface. This is
the danger that we need to realize.
§ Even if we manage to avoid such “extreme conditions” in this life because we have been
fortunate to be born under good conditions, we have no idea where we will be born in the
future. This is why the Buddha said, “..appamadena sampadeta” or “make haste and sort out
‘san‘ or what to do and what not to do”.
10. As we mentioned in the beginning, each one’s pañcakkhandha is unique. Each has his/her own
feelings, perceptions, mental attributes (good and bad), and viññāṇa regarding any sense event. We
make our decisions accordingly. Our character (gathi) is in pañcakkhandha (the way we see and
comprehend the world) and even more so in our pañcaupādānakkhandha (our desires for the
worldly things).
§ And diṭṭhi (our world views) is a critical part of both pañcakkhandha and
pañcaupādānakkhandha. Our decisions depend critically on our diṭṭhi. There are many posts at
the site on the importance of diṭṭhi. The first step to Nibbāna (the Sotāpanna stage) is sammā
diṭṭhi.
§ Unless one comprehends the true nature of this world of 31 realms (anicca, dukkha, anatta),
one cannot attain sammā diṭṭhi at least to some extent.
11. When one acts with avijjā (due to not comprehending the true nature of the world), one does
(abhi) saṅkhāra, and keeps adding to the pañcaupādānakkhandha.
§ When we start with the “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step, it leads to “upādāna paccayā bhava“.
Thus according the types of (abhi) saṅkhāra one does, one makes “bonding” or “attaches to”
certain types of “bhava” or existence.
§ Paṭicca samuppāda explains how we make bhava according to the level of avijjā (as indicated
by our gathi, anusaya, etc) that is embedded in our pañcaupādānakkhandha.
§ Thus, one’s pañcaupādānakkhandha has embedded in it the “cravings and desires” of oneself,
and where one is destined to have rebirths.
12. Therefore, we can see that no matter how we analyze things, they all converge to the same
fundamentals. Before we embark on the journey to safety (Nibbāna, or at least the Sotāpanna stage),
we need to figure out the “lay of the land”. That is anicca, dukkha, anatta, the nature of this world.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Key Dhamma Concepts 275
§ Only then that our minds will willingly give up the diṭṭhis or wrong views.
§ Only then that our minds will see the dangers of sense pleasures, starting at the excess levels of
kāma chanda and vyāpāda, which could lead to rebirth in the apāyas.
§ If you could not grasp everything, that is fine. Come back and read the post again later,
especially after reading other relevant posts. Each time you read, you may be able to grasp
something that was not unclear. It happens to me all the time. When the minds starts grasping at
least partly, it will become much easier.
13. It is very important to see the difference between the “physical world” which is made of “satara
mahā bhūta” and the pañcakkhandha which is all mental.
§ The physical world out there is the same for all of us. But our mental impressions of it
(pañcakkhandha) are different for each of us. It is easy to see that our feelings, perceptions, and
saṅkhāra that we create upon seeing the same person are different.
§ Our pañcaupādānakkhandha, or the fraction of the pañcakkhandha that we have attachment
for, is even more personal, unique for each person.
IV Living Dhamma
§ Six Root Causes – Loka Samudaya (Arising of Suffering) and Loka Nirodhaya (Nibbāna)
· Rūpa Aggregate
· Viññāṇa Aggregate
· Sakkāya Diṭṭhi
· Nāmarūpa Formation
Comments/questions at the puredhamma discussion forum: “Forums“. The registration process and
guidelines are at: “Pure Dhamma Discussion Forum Guidelines“. I can also be reached via email:
[email protected].
January 6, 2019
Introduction
1. The First Noble Truth is about the suffering that can be eliminated from arising.
§ The second describes how suffering arises, due to our own cravings (which we manifest via
our own saṅkhāra that we generate willingly, as we have discussed; see, “Saṅkhāra – What
It Really Means“). I will write a simpler version in the next post.
§ The Third Noble Truth says that future suffering can be stopped by eliminating those cravings.
That REQUIRES and understanding of the wider world view of the Buddha with the rebirth
process within the 31 realms.
§ The Forth Noble Truth is the way to acquire that understanding by “learning and living” that
Dhammā (by following the Noble Eightfold Path).
2. The Buddha said, “my Dhammā has not been known in this world. This Dhammā has never been
heard of previously”.
§ What is new about knowing that there is suffering around us? Everybody knows that there is
suffering with old age, diseases, poverty, etc. One does not have to be a Buddhist to see that.
§ So, we need to figure out “what is new” about suffering that is explained in the First
Noble Truth.
likes is suffering. If one does not get what one likes (iccha), that is suffering – Doing worldly
activities (saṃkhittena) to get all those things one craves for (pañcupādānakkhandha) is
suffering.
§ There is a deeper meaning in the part, “If one does not get what one likes (iccha), that is
suffering “, that is connected to the anicca nature.
§ That deeper meaning is expressed in terms of taṇhā (craving) is expressed in the final part,
“Doing worldly activities (saṃkhittena) to get all those things one craves for
(pañcupādānakkhandha) is suffering.”
4. Just as in science, something comes about due to causes. Our present life as a human has come
about due to causes (kamma) done in the past. Some of those were “good kamma” and that is why we
can enjoy some pleasures. Bad kamma have led to instances of suffering.
§ But there are lower realms, including the animal realm, where suffering is much higher. Bad
kamma lead to such births.
§ Suffering in the four lowest realms is the real suffering. That is what we first need to focus
on.
§ And all that suffering arises because we crave for things in this world because of our avijjā
(not comprehending the Four Noble Truths).
5. Seeing this hidden suffering is indeed difficult. When the Buddha attained the Buddhahood, it
said that he was worried whether he could convey this deep ideas to most people.
§ We seek pleasures that are highly visible. But if we gain such pleasures with immoral acts, the
consequences of such immoral acts are not apparent. We can see a stone thrown up coming
down, but we cannot see any bad consequences to the drug dealer who seems to be enjoying
life.
The Second Noble Truth – Causes for Future Suffering
6. the cause of future suffering is indicated in the First Noble Truth: It is the craving for sense
pleasures. The worst outcomes (rebirths in the apāyās) will result if we do immoral things to get such
sense pleasures.
§ For example, person X may kill another person to get his money or to marry his wife. Even
though X may accomplish that goal and “enjoy life” for even 100 years, that is nothing
compared millions of years of future suffering X will go through due to his immoral action.
7. When a fish bites the bait, it does not see the suffering hidden in that action. Looking from the
ground we can see the whole picture and we know what is going to happen to the fish if it bites the
bait. But the fish is unable to see that whole picture, and thus does not see the hidden suffering. It
only sees a delicious bit of food.
§ In the same way, if we do not know about the wider world of 31 realms (with the suffering-
filled four lowest realms), we only focus on what is easily accessible to our six senses.
§ In order to really comprehend suffering through repeated rebirths, one needs to comprehend
that most suffering is encountered in the 4 lowest realms (apāyās); see, “The Grand Unified
Theory of Dhamma“ at puredhamma.net.
§ Thus, stopping suffering requires one to be mindful of one’s actions and stop doing bad vacī
and kāya saṅkhāra (i.e., immoral thinking, speech, and deeds).
8. Therefore, the “never heard truth about suffering” that the Buddha revealed is the suffering
that is hidden in sense pleasures. The level of suffering depends on what we do (vacī and kāya
saṅkhāra) to get those pleasures.If they are immoral then worst suffering in the apāyās will
result.
§ We believe that those sense pleasures are to be valued and to be enjoyed. That is because we do
not see right away the consequences of any bad actions that we do to get those sense pleasures.
§ For example, if one rapes a woman to get enjoyment for a short time, one could be spending
millions of years as an animal in the future because of that immoral action.
§ However, it may not be easy to grasp this point. One needs to advance step-by-step; see, “Is It
Necessary for a Buddhist to Eliminate Sensual Desires?“.
§ The first step to reduce suffering in the future is to avoid doing bad deeds (kamma) via
thoughts, speech, and bodily actions (again, these are associated with mano, vacī, and kāya
saṅkhāra).
§ Therefore, we create our own future happiness via puñña abhisaṅkhāra (good saṅkhāra)
or future suffering via apuñña abhisaṅkhāra (immoral saṅkhāra).
§ But unlike in Hinduism, Kamma is not deterministic, i.e., not all kamma vipāka have to come to
fruition; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
§ Suitable CONDITIONS must be there to bring good or bad kamma vipāka to fruition. That is
why kamma is not deterministic and we can stop ALL future suffering.
§ We just need to get rid of avijjā and taṇhā, two key steps in Paṭicca Samuppāda. That is how
Angulimāla overcame all that bad kamma of killing almost 1000 people.
Only a Part of Suffering in This Life Can Be Eliminated
Finally, we can look into what can of suffering can be stopped from arising in this itself, so that we
can gain confidence in Buddha Dhamma. One does not need to blindly believe and follow Buddha’s
teachings.
17. There are two types of vedanā (feelings); see, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
§ First is due to kamma vipāka.
§ The second is mental suffering due to saṅkhāra (via attachment to sensual pleasures and
friction (paṭigha) due to things we don’t like). This could lead to depression.
18. This life is the RESULT of past kamma. Once a life starts, it cannot be stopped until “its kammic
energy” is exhausted. This life WILL end up in old age, decay, and eventual death.
§ Therefore, if someone has aches and pains due to old age, it is not possible to get rid of them
other than to use medications or therapy to lessen the pain and manage it.
§ Even the Buddha had back pain due to old age, and had a severe stomach ache at the end.
§ One may get injured, come down with a disease, etc.
§ All these are due to kamma vipāka.
19. On the other hand, it is possible to stop the second type (“mental suffering”) that arises due to our
own way of thinking (again, our own vacī saṅkhāra).
§ Therefore, we can EXPERIENCE the relief from suffering (called nirāmisa sukha) in this life
itself.
§ The suffering (or vedanā) that a living Arahant has eliminated is called “samphassa ja vedanā“.
This is what leads to depression in some people.
§ Here, “samphassa” is “san” + “phassa“, or “contact with one’s own defilements (san)”; see,
“What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Samsāra)“.
Humans Have Free Will to Eliminate Future Suffering
20. The life we have as a human is a RESULT of a past good deed. The life of a dog or an ant is the
result of a past deed by that sentient being.
§ And what happens to us in this life is a COMBINATION of what we have done in the past
(kamma vipāka) AND what we do in this life.
§ What happens to an animal is MOSTLY due to kamma vipāka from the past.
§ The difference between a human and an animal is that the animal does not have much control
over what is going to happen to it. But human birth is a special one: We have a higher level
mind that CAN change the future to some extent, and with possible enormous consequences.
§ We have free will and animals (or those beings in other lower realms) do not. We can
control our saṅkhāra, and they cannot. It is very difficult to get a human birth. We should
not waste this opportunity.
Feelings: Normally used together with emotion. For example, a “feeling of joy.”
Perception: recognition.
Emotions: Some define emotions as: “joy-sadness, anger-compassion, greed-benevolence, etc. etc..”
3. That is all modern psychology says, and there are many overlaps there too. There are no
universally accepted definitions for those words yet.
§ On the other hand, the Buddha has provided a very detailed analysis of the Pāli words citta,
saññā, vedanā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa.
§ Saṅkhāra arises due to emotions. These emotions are called cetasika which is normally
translated as “mental factors”.
§ Therefore, citta, saññā, vedanā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa SEEM TO correspond to the English words
thought, perception, feeling, actions based on emotions, and consciousness. But that can lead to
many misinterpretations, as we will discuss below.
4. That is why it is almost impossible to translate those Pāli words into a single English word.
The closest is probably “perception” for saññā, even though saññā also means something more
profound.
§ It is much better to learn the meaning of each Pāli word and use that word itself.
§ I will briefly discuss some key features to get a basic idea. Other aspects are discussed at: “Pāli
Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
Citta and Thought – Not Even Close
5. Cittas arise as a series; a single citta never arises by itself.
§ In a sensing event that involves the five physical senses (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body), a citta
vīthi (or a series of citta) arise with 17 citta in that series.
§ In the case of citta arising in mind, the basic citta vīthi has 12-14 citta. But in some exceptional
cases, there is no limit to the number citta that can occur (like in jhāna samāpatti).
§ There can be billions of citta vīthi running within “the blink of eye” according to Abhidhamma.
The Buddha said that there is nothing in this universe faster than a citta.
§ After reading this post, you may want to read the previous post, “Amazingly Fast Time
Evolution of a Thought (Citta).” That could make things more clear.
6. So you can see that what we call a “thought” is NOT a single citta. What we experience as a
“thought” is the overall effect of a large number of citta vīthi.
§ Each citta arises with at least seven cetasika (mental factors). Vedanā and saññā are two of
those psychological factors. Once a “good citta” occurs, many of those arise without changing
to “bad citta” in the middle. That is why a “given sense experience” is just called a citta, even
though it may have billions of individual citta.
§ If it is a “moral citta,” then it would have some combination of “good mental factors” such as
compassion or “fear of wrongdoing” (hiri). There are 25 of them, and only several of them arise
at a given time.
§ If it is an “immoral citta,” it would have “bad mental factors” such as greed and hate. There are
14 of them.
§ Those good and bad mental factors (cetasika) never arise together.
Vedanā and Saññā – In Every Citta
7. Vedanā and saññā are two special types of cetasika. That is why they are treated separately from
other cetasika.
§ Both of those arise with every citta.
§ Vedanā basically “feels” that a sense event is happening. There is a sukha vedanā, dukkha
vedanā, or a neutral vedanā (more accurately adhukkhamasukha vedanā) associated with
EACH sense event. Therefore, joy is not a vedanā; see #2 above. There are only three types of
vedanā.
§ Saññā is responsible for recognizing what the sense object is, based on one’s prior
experience with that object. So, one perceives a rose and that it has color of red, for example.
§ It is essential to realize that we have control over vacī saṅkhāra and kāya saṅkhāra, but
mano saṅkhāra arise automatically based on our gati.
10. To summarize what we have discussed so far:
§ What we experience (and call a thought), is actually the overall effect of millions of citta vīthi.
§ Current scientific research says a human can only register sense events lasting at least a
hundredth of a second (about ten milliseconds). During that time, millions of citta vīthi would
have arisen.
§ The sense object is recognized with the saññā cetasika, and accordingly, a sukha, dukkha or
neutral vedanā arise.
§ Based on that recognition (but simultaneously) a set of good, bad cetasika arise.
§ Based on those good or bad set of cetasika, the mind generates good bad saṅkhāra with which
we think, speak, and do things.
Emotions Arise Based on One’s Gati and the Sense Input
11. Thus mano saṅkhāra arise automatically based on our gati (or gathi) and the particular sense
input. If one likes a particular sense input (based on one’s gati), then one will start thinking about it.
§ So, we consciously think and speak with vacī saṅkhāra based on those emotions (mano
saṅkhāra) that initially arise. If our emotions get high enough, we may take bodily actions
based on kāya saṅkhāra.
§ All three types of saṅkhāra arise in mind.
12. I need to emphasize the fact that occurring of a set of good or bad cetasika DOES NOT happen
arbitrarily. Nothing happens without a cause.
§ Basically, two key factors determine what kind of cetasika arise for a given sense event: (1)
One’s gati (pronounced “gathi”), roughly meaning character/habits, and, (2) the
particular sense object.
§ Gati has been explained in many posts: “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and
Cravings (Asavas),” “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific View,” “Gati to
Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control,” are just a few.
Viññāṇa Is the Overall Experience – Plus Future Expectations
13. Finally, viññāṇa represents one’s overall sense experience (including vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra).
§ Viññāṇa has something in addition to those. One may form a future expectation based on that
sensory input.
§ If one gets attracted to a given sense experience, one may keep thinking about it and
initiate an expectation to enjoy it further. Viññāṇa is that expectation.This is an energy
generated in what is called a javana citta.
That creates a kamma beeja that can bring vipāka
in the future.
§ More information at: “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means” and “Viññāṇa (Defiled
Consciousness).”
14. So, we see that viññāṇa is much more than just consciousness. It is wrong to translate viññāṇa as
just consciousness (or awareness).
§ That is only an basic description of viññāṇa. Deeper aspects of viññāṇa can be found in the
subsection: “Viññāṇa Aggregate.”
Expectations Are Only in Mano Viññāṇa (Normally Called Viññāṇa)
15. There are six types of viññāṇa.
§ We become aware of something in our physical world via cakkhu viññāṇa (seeing), sota
viññāṇa (hearing), ghāṇa viññāṇa (smelling), jivhā viññāṇa (tasting), and kāya viññāṇa
(touching).
§ Then mano viññāṇa takes over, and will decide to act on it — and if needed — to make “future
expectations” or “plans.” (Three manodvāra citta vīthi follow each pañcadvāra citta vīthi per
Abhidhamma.)
§ Therefore, it is the mano viññāṇa that builds expectations for the future.
§ To emphasize: Kamma beeja that can bring future vipāka are generated only in mano viññāṇa.
The other five types of viññāṇa only bring in the external sensory input.
§ Therefore, when suttas refer to viññāṇa without a distinction, the reference is to mano
viññāṇa.
§ The other five types of viññāṇa just “bring the sense signal to mind”.
Mano Viññāṇa and Saṅkhāra Feed on Each Other
16. For example, cakkhu viññāṇa is like a camera taking a picture. It is the mano viññāṇa that takes
actions (generates saṅkhāra) based on that sensory input.
§ If the sense input is attractive, it will try to get “more of such sense inputs,” i.e., it will initiate a
viññāṇa to “achieve that expectation” via “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa.” For example, let us
assume that person X sees a new car and “falls in love with it” and makes a viññāṇa (an
expectation, which is a mental energy) for it.
§ That viññāṇa to “buy that car Y” will be in the subconscious of X. It will be in his subconscious
until either he buys it or it turns out that there is absolutely no way for him to afford it.
17. Days later, he is driving to work and sees a similar car on the road (that is, of course a cakkhu
viññāṇa).
§ Now that viññāṇa to “buy that car Y” will come back to his mind (triggered by that cakkhu
viññāṇa. Then of course his mano viññāṇa will take over and his interest in the car will come to
his mind.the car
§ Then we will start generating vacī saṅkhāra (conscious thoughts) about buying that car and
how nice it would be drive to work in it, etc). That is the backward step of “viññāṇa paccayā
saṅkhāra.” The Paṭicca Samuppāda step “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” runs backward too; see,
“Āsevana and Aññamañña Paccayā.”
§ That in turn will provide “more food” for that viññāṇa via “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa.”
§ Therefore, saṅkhāra and viññāṇa “feed on each other.”
One should contemplate on these ideas and apply them to other “real life situations.” That is real
“insight meditation” or “vipassanā bhāvanā.”
Resources
18. A reasonably good idea of the structure in Abhidhamma can be gained by reading Bhikkhu
Bodhi’s book, “WebLink: PDF download: A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma.”
§ “WebLink: PDF download: Buddha Abhidhamma – Ultimate Science,” by Dr. Mehm Tin Mon
is also a good FREE publication.
§ But both of those authors also translate viññāṇa as consciousness. Furthermore, they have
translate citta also as consciousness. There are other translation problems too.
§ However, by reviewing those two resources one can see how in-depth and detailed the mind
processes are analyzed in Abhidhamma.
§ The “Abhidhamma” section, together with the “Tables and Summaries” section also provides
more information on Abhidhamma.
4.1.3 Viññāṇa – Consciousness Together With Future Expectations
1. Viññāṇa means “without ñāṇa” or without wisdom, i.e., with ignorance. Viññāṇa could also mean
“defiled viññāṇa”, i.e., not knowing the consequences of doing dasa akusala.
§ When one attains the Arahanthood, when one’s paññā (wisdom) will be optimized and one will
have “undefiled or clear viññāṇa”.
§ There are many suttās that clearly state “viññāṇa nirodha“, or stopping the arising of viññāṇa
(defiled viññāṇa) leads to Nibbāna.
A succinct statement can be found in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Dvayatānupassanāsutta (Sutta
Nipata 3.12)“:
“Yaṃ kiñci dukkhaṃ sambhoti,
Sabbaṃ viññāṇapaccayā;
Viññāṇassa nirodhena,
Natthi dukkhassa sambhavo“.
§ Translated: “Whatever suffering that arises, all that arises due to viññāṇa; With not arising of
viññāṇa, there is no existence with suffering“.
§ A detailed explanation is at, “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
§ I will introduce the concept of viññāṇa in a simple way. In the simplest form, viññāṇa is any
type of expectation even without moral/immoral implications.
2. Viññāṇa includes or encompasses the following: our feelings (vedanā), perceptions (saññā), and a
set individual mental factors (cetasika). They all arise together, and the set of cetasika that arise is
dependent on each person’s gati (habits/character). If you are not familiar with Abhidhamma,
don’t worry about it. I will take a simple example to illustrate viññāṇa below.
§ Five of the six types of viññāṇa are strictly vipāka viññāṇa. These are the five types of viññāṇa
associated with the five physical senses.
§ We become aware of something in our physical world via cakkhu viññāṇa (seeing), sota
viññāṇa (hearing), ghāṇa viññāṇa (smelling), jivhā viññāṇa (tasting), and kāya viññāṇa
(touching); these are due to past kamma vipāka.
§ When one of our five physical senses detects something in our physical world, one of those
five types of viññāṇa arise. If we get interested in them, we start generating mano viññāṇa
and doing kamma.
§ Furthermore, X will be thinking about Y often (which is generating vacī saṅkhāra), that will
also help make that “viññāṇa for having a close relationship with Y” to grow.
§ That happens via “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” step in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
7. Several days later, X finds out that Y is married, when her husband comes to meet her at work.
§ He could clearly see that she is happily married and there is no point in even thinking about
having a relationship with her.
§ In an instant, X’s “viññāṇa for having a close relationship with Y” will be eliminated (for
most people).
§ When the reality of the situation is comprehended by the mind, corresponding viññāṇa will be
stopped. This is what is meant by “viññāṇa nirodha“.
8. Therefore, it is important to see that a viññāṇa (or an expectation) will be eliminated as soon
as one realizes the futility (or the dangers) of that expectation.
§ At a deeper level, all of one’s highly immoral types of viññāṇa will be permanently removed
when one will be able to see the futility/dangers in engaging in immoral deeds. That is when
one attains the Sotāpanna stage via comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Next, one’s expectation for seeking pleasures in this world will be totally removed when one
realizes the futility — and dangers — in seeking such sense pleasures. That is when one attains
the Anāgāmi stage of Nibbāna.
§ Once one becomes an Anāgāmi, one is at a stage where one can start seeing the futility of
jhānic pleasures and start getting rid of rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga (or the futility of born in the
rūpāvacara and arūpāvacara realms. That is when one becomes an Arahant.
§ Therefore, the way to Nibbāna is a step-by-step process; see, “Is It Necessary for a Buddhist to
Eliminate Sensual Desires?“.
9. There are many types of viññāṇa that we can have. The minor ones are just expectations of getting
something done or buying something or getting new job, etc.
§ Saṅkhāra or “thinking of that expectation and making plans to get it done also by speaking and
doing things (that includes vacī saṅkhāra and kāya saṅkhāra)” will make that viññāṇa to grow.
This comes via the “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” step.
§ In another example, suppose X is thinking about buying a certain type of car. That idea or
expectation will be “at the back of his mind” all the time. If he sees a car like that on the road,
then that viññāṇa will be awakened, and he will start thinking about it again. Now, one day X
buys that car. Then that viññāṇa will also disappear since he will no longer interested in buying
a car. That expectation has been fulfilled.
§ Therefore, a viññāṇa will “take hold in the and grow” only as long as one has a desire AND one
believes that it can be fulfilled.
10. I gave those two examples to illustrate the basic concept. But more complex types of viññāṇa can
grow based on certain types of activities that X engages in, and those can become paṭisandhi viññāṇa
that can lead to rebirths.
§ For example, if X constantly engages in helping others, donating time and money to charities,
etc, he would be cultivating the mindset of a deva (even without knowing). Then that “moral
viññāṇa” would grow with time and may lead to a rebirth in a deva realm.
§ If one is constantly thinking and planning to make money by exploiting/deceiving others,
he/she is doing vacī/kāya saṅkhāra that will be feeding a “bad viññāṇa” that can lead to a birth
in the apāyās.
§ Therefore, viññāṇa can be various types.
§ However, there are six basic types of viññāṇa. The above examples all belong to “mano
viññāṇa“, except the cakkhu viññāṇa that was involved when X saw Y.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
290 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
11. As we discussed in #2, there are five basic types of viññāṇa just bring external sense objects
(pictures, sounds, tastes, smells, and touches) to our mind.
§ Then mano viññāṇa takes over, and will decide to act on it — and if needed — makes “future
expectations” or “future plans”. Therefore, it is the mano viññāṇa that has expectations for
the future.
§ We ignore most of the things we see, hear, etc. But if we get attracted to something, then we
will be going back to see, hear, etc and may be making other related plans too. That is all done
with mano viññāṇa.
12. Obviously, paṭisandhi viññāṇa is a very important mano viññāṇa. It can determine future births.
§ This is a complex subject, but when one engages in highly immoral deeds, the paṭisandhi
viññāṇa that grows may not be what one desires.
§ For example, suppose X is a serial rapist. He gets a temporary sense satisfaction by raping
women. What he does not know is that he is cultivating a viññāṇa that is appropriate for an
animal. So, he could get an animal birth because of that immoral viññāṇa he is cultivating.
§ So, hopefully you can see the connection between viññāṇa and gati (pronounced “gathi”) too.
Gati (character qualities/habits) is an important concept that has been hidden in recent years.
13. When one attains the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, one would see the futility of such immoral and
briefly-lived sense pleasures. Then such types of “immoral viññāṇa” would not be cultivated in his
mind.
§ In other words, one’s “hidden immoral gati” will be permanently removed at the Sotāpanna
stage.
§ That is comparable to X losing the “viññāṇa for having a close relationship with Y” in #3 to #7
above. In that case, X clearly saw the uselessness of having that viññāṇa, and it died.
§ It would be a good idea to read and understand posts on gati: “How Habits are Formed and
Broken – A Scientific View“; “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“; “Gati
to Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“.
14. I made this discussion simple in order to get two main ideas across, which are:
§ Viññāṇa is a complex concept. This is why it not appropriate to translate viññāṇa as just
“consciousness”.
§ Mano viññāṇa arise due to saṅkhāra (“san” + “khāra“). We cultivate those via “saṅkhāra
paccayā viññāṇa” in the Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles.
§ This is why “san” is a key root word in Pāli; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or
Samsāra)“.
15. I hope that those who translate deep suttas word-by-word will at least read these series of posts
and make amendments to their ways of translating key suttas that discuss deep meanings. They are
no different from the Sati bhikkhu who could not understand what is meant by viññāṇa in the
WebLink: suttacentral: Maha Tanhasankhaya Sutta (MN 38).
§ One should not be translating such deep suttas (also there is no point in reading them either)
until one understands what is meant by viññāṇa.
16. The WebLink: suttacentral: Kevaṭṭa Sutta (DN 11) is another such a sutta (among many others).
§ The key verse there is at the end of the sutta: “Viññāṇaṃ anidassanaṃ, anantaṃ
sabbatopabhaṃ Ettha āpo ca pathavī, tejo vāyo na gādhati. Ettha dīghañca rassañca, aṇuṃ
thūlaṃ subhāsubhaṃ; Ettha nāmañca rūpañca, asesaṃ uparujjhati; Viññāṇassa nirodhena,
etthetaṃ uparujjhatī’”ti.
§ This is explained in detail at, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
17. As I have said many times, Buddha Dhamma is deep. It takes an effort to learn. Just translating
deep suttas word-by-word or just reading those translations will not be of much benefit in the long
run.
§ Of course some suttas can be translated word-by-word, like the WebLink: suttacentral: Kalama
Sutta (AN 3.65). Those are basic suttas that provide guidelines to live a moral life. But deep
suttas that discuss anicca, anatta, or Nibbāna require a more deeper knowledge of the basics
like what is meant by saññā, viññāṇa, saṅkhāra, etc.
§ It is best to learn the meanings of these key words and just use them, instead of
translating them as a single English word. I hope you can see why, with the above
discussion on viññāṇa.
Also see, “Connection Between Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa” and “Viññāṇa and Saṅkhāra – Connection to
Paṭicca Samuppāda“. These three posts are essential to be understood if one really wants to
understand Buddha Dhamma.
4.1.4 Connection Between Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa
1. In a recent post, “Viññāṇa – Consciousness Together With Future Expectations“, I discussed how
viññāṇa or “future expectations” are established when one gets attached to something and starts
doing saṅkhāra (conscious thinking, speech, and actions) about it.
§ In this post, I will elaborate more on the importance of saṅkhāra and the connection to viññāṇa.
In a few posts, I will try to explain how we create our own future suffering by engaging in
abhisaṅkhāra or “strong saṅkhāra“.
§ These abhisaṅkhāra are nothing but how we think about, speak about, and take actions on
moral/immoral issues. If we do any of the dasa akusala, then we are generating “bad
abhisaṅkhāra” or “apuñña abhisaṅkhāra” (abbreviated as “apuññābhisaṅkhāra“).
§ Those apuññābhisaṅkhāra lead to suffering. Therefore, key to stop future suffering is to
gradually reduce apuññābhisaṅkhāra and eventually to stop them.
2. In addition to what we discussed in that previous post, another key point is to realize that all our
speech and bodily actions are started by the mind.
§ Can you do anything, if you (or your mind) does not want to do?
§ You may be in the middle of doing something (say walking to the kitchen), but you can decide
you don’t really want to go the kitchen and instead walk to the living room. If you start saying
something, you can stop in mid-sentence if you want to.
§ Some people have strange ideas about humans not having free will. They should try what I just
suggested above. It is not that hard to verify.
3. All the progress that science has made is based on the “mind power” of the humans (scientists
coming up with breakthrough innovations in their minds). Mind comes first and this is what is
expressed in the very first Dhammapada gāthā: “manopubbangamā dhammā..” or “mind is at the
forefront”.
§ A child’s future depends on how well he learns. If the mind of the child goes in the wrong
direction, he/she could become a drug addict or even a murderer.
§ In the same way, we determine our own LONG TERM future in the rebirth process by the ways
in which we think, speak, and act. That is what is really explained in Paṭicca Samuppāda
(normally translated as “Dependent Origination”; again, it is much better to use the Pāli term
and understand what is really meant by it).
4. From the moment we wake up in the morning, we do nothing but generate saṅkhāra.
§ When we just experience a sense input (seeing, hearing, etc) , “mano saṅkhāra“ are
automatically generated.
§ The Buddha said, “vedanā, saññā are mano saṅkhāra“: we just experience the sense input
by recognizing it and generating a “sukha, dukkha, or neutral feeling about it”.
5. When we start thinking consciously about a particular sense input (what we saw, heard, tasted,
etc), we start generating vacī saṅkhāra; we may also speak with vacī saṅkhāra. Here, vacī is
pronounced “vachee”.
§ For example, if we see a nice car and start thinking about how nice it would be to own such a
car, how we can impress our friends with it, etc, we are fully aware of such thoughts.
§ Such conscious generation of thoughts about “what to do about a given sense input and how to
go about it”, for example, are vacī saṅkhāra. Actual speech is also vacī saṅkhāra.
§ The Buddha said, “vitakka, vicāra are vacī saṅkhāra“: stay on the given sense input and
generating thoughts about it or related things.
§ Furthermore, we can keep going with such “day dreaming” or we can stop them. If it is
something we like, it may be hard to stop thinking about it, i.e., it may take will power.
§ That is what is involved in Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna: stopping bad vacī saṅkhāra.
6. If we just proceed with those vacī saṅkhāra, our emotions may get strong and we may start
speaking out (stronger vacī saṅkhāra). If we get “really worked up” we may do bodily actions with
such emotions, then those are done with kāya saṅkhāra.
§ For example, let us say two people get into an argument and start shouting at each other. Each
person is speaking harsh words (generated via vacī saṅkhāra).
§ Then one of them (person X) gets “really worked up”, loses all restraint, and hits the other
person. That “hitting action” was done with kāya saṅkhāra (generating thoughts to raise the
hand and hit that person).
7. It is important to realize that both speech and bodily actions are initiated by the mind.
§ In the above example, both people were engaged in generating “bad vacī saṅkhāra“, which are
nothing but “bad speech”, the opposite of “Sammā Vācā” or “correct speech”.
§ Then person X took did an even worse thing by hitting the other person. That was a “bad
action”, opposite of “Sammā Kammanta“.
§ Therefore, they were both acting with “avijjā” or ignorance of the consequences of their
actions. That is “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“, the first step in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
8. Now, we can see what is meant by “saṅkhāra” (and “abhisaṅkhāra“).
§ In the above example, both vacī saṅkhāra and kāya saṅkhāra generated by person X were
“abhisaṅkhāra” or “strong saṅkhāra“.
§ If those two people were just taking about something kammically neutral, say about the
weather, then that would involve just “saṅkhāra“.
§ If they were talking about weather, while walking, then that would involve both vacī and
kāya saṅkhāra that are NOT of “abhisaṅkhāra” type. That speech and action did not involve
generation of “kammic energy”.
9. Therefore, it is important to understand the difference between just saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra. In
the suttas, or in Paṭicca Samuppāda, the word “saṅkhāra” is used often without specifically saying
whether it is just “saṅkhāra” or “abhisaṅkhāra“.
§ Depending on the context, we should be able to determine whether it is just “saṅkhāra” or
“abhisaṅkhāra“.
§ Not only that, but abhisaṅkhāra are also two types: puññābhisaṅkhāra (puñña abhisaṅkhāra or
“good deeds”) and apuññābhisaṅkhāra (apuñña abhisaṅkhāra or “bad deeds”).
§ Here by “deeds” we include all three types of saṅkhāra: mano, vacī, and kāya. We should
AVOID all three types of apuññābhisaṅkhāra or immoral thoughts, speech, and actions.
10. It is again important to emphasize that mano saṅkhāra arise AUTOMATICALLY based on two
things: (1) the sense input, and (2) one’s own gati or gathi (character/habits), as we discussed in the
post: “Introduction to Citta, Vedanā, Saññā, Saṅkhāra, and Viññāṇa“.
§ For example, if someone has a bad temper (that is a bad gati), then that person can be made
angry by the slightest provocation.
§ On the other hand, there are people who are calm and measured and are not easy to become
angry. It will take much stronger provocation to make them angry.
§ In the same way, some people are greedy and are easily attached to tasty foods. Some people
are kind and quick to come to help for others in need, etc.
11. The key to making progress in the Path of the Buddha is to cultivate “good gati” and gradually
reduce “bad gati“.
§ If one is “quick to anger”, that is a bad gati. One important way to reduce that bad gati is to
stop generating vacī and kāya saṅkhāra by will power when they start arising.
§ For example, some people get angry even when they hear the name of a person they do not like.
Then they start thinking about all the bad things that person has done in the past. That is
generating “bad vacī saṅkhāra“.
§ Even though one may not be saying a single bad word, just consciously think about bad
thoughts about another person will feed that bad habit. So, it is important to realize that
generating such “silent bad thoughts” is as bad as saying harsh words.
§ Of course actually speaking out (also vacī saṅkhāra) and doing bad things to person (hitting for
example), are also bad abhisaṅkhāra.
12. This “feeding bad habits” via (apuññābhi)saṅkhāra generation is explained via the step,
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ When person X has a “grudge against person Y”, person X has a “viññāṇa” or an
expectation in his mind to “get back to Y or hurt Y” whenever an opportunity arises.
§ That viññāṇa “gets food to grow” each time X starts generating bad thoughts about Y, speak
against Y, or do something to hurt Y. Those all belong to vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ On the other hand, mano saṅkhāra about Y arise automatically in X’s mind when X sees Y or
even when Y’s name is mentioned by someone else. Then X is likely to start generating vacī
saṅkhāra or “conscious thoughts about Y”.
§ The key to progress is to STOP such vacī saṅkhāra AS SOON AS one becomes aware of them.
13. Just like a person, an animal, or even a tree would grow when given food on a regular basis, one’s
viññāṇa would grow when “it is fed on a regular basis” by generating vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ It works backwards too. If food is reduced, a tree will not grow well. If food and water are
totally stopped, the tree will die.
§ In the same way, if one stops feeding a given “viññāṇa” (or a “future expectation”) by
stopping vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, that viññāṇa will die with time.
§ In the same way, we want to “feed a good viññāṇa“, say to act kindly towards other people and
animals. So, we should INCREASE vacī and saṅkhāra generation: generate more
compassionate thoughts and engage in compassionate activities like giving.
14. So, hopefully, we now have a good idea about what saṅkhāra (and abhisaṅkhāra) are and how
they lead to good or bad viññāṇa.
§ We will discuss more on viññāṇa in the next post. In the mean time, please do not hesitate to
ask questions. It is important to understand these basic concepts.
4.1.5 Viññāṇa and Saṅkhāra – Connection to Paṭicca Samuppāda
1. To review briefly what we have covered in the last few posts in “Essential Buddhism“:
§ A defiled consciousness or viññāṇa has an “expectation” for the future. That is the “kammic
energy” that is responsible for “sustaining the rebirth process”. We are just getting the basic
idea established in these posts.
§ We do that willingly by generating (abhi)saṅkhāra, or very simply, by the way of we think,
speak, and act.
§ One who has not understood the First Noble Truth is willingly generating (abhi) saṅkhāra via,
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” that leads then to the cultivation of different types of viññāṇa via
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” step. That is how Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles start. They end up in
“jāti paccayā jara, marana, soka, parideva, dukkha,..”, the whole mass of suffering!
§ Therefore, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” lead to all future
suffering.We will proceed step-by-step.
2. There are five types of viññāṇa that can be called “just consciousness”, i.e., without “future
expectations”. These are cakkhu viññāṇa (a “seeing event”), sota viññāṇa (a “hearing event”), etc for
the five physical sense inputs. One more special case with mano viññāṇa is discussed in #4 below.
§ A “defiled viññāṇa” or “an expectation for the future” is associated only with the mano
viññāṇa, which is what normally referred to in a Paṭicca Samuppāda cycle if a specific type is
not mentioned.
§ Therefore, in Paṭicca Samuppāda or in any sutta, if a reference is made to viññāṇa, that is
referring to “mano viññāṇa” or “mind consciousness”.
§ The mind generates the “kammic power” to create “kammic energy” or “kamma bīja” (“bīja” is
pronounced “beeja”, so I prefer to write it as “beeja“); see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja,
Kamma Vipāka“. [bīja :[nt.] seed; germ; generating element.]
3. Other five types of viññāṇa (e.g. cakkhu viññāṇa, etc) are only registered in the mind, when we
see, hear, taste, etc.
§ This is stated as “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ” in suttas or in
Abhidhamma. This is normally translated as “eye consciousness arises when a picture is seen or
received by the eyes”. That gives the basic idea, but it has a deeper meaning that we will
discuss later.
§ Similarly, hearing happens with “sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ” (“hearing
consciousness arises when a sound is heard or received by the ears”), etc.
4. In addition to the sense inputs via the five physical senses, we also get sense inputs DIRECTLY to
the mind. These are “past memories and future hopes” that just come to the mind, and are mano
viññāṇa. Even though they seem to come to the mind due to no reason, it also happens due to the
mind DIRECTLY receiving a past memory (called dhammā; this dhammā is different from dhamma
in Buddha Dhamma).
§ This process is stated as “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“, or “mind
consciousness arises when a dhammā (or a past memory) is received by the mana indriya or the
mind”.
§ This event is also “just consciousness”, remembering a past event or a future expectation; for a
deeper discussion, see, “What are Dhammā? – A Deeper Analysis“.
5. Therefore, the mind can “receive” six types of “sense inputs”, i.e., the mind becomes “aware of” or
“becomes conscious about” those six types of sense events.
§ Based on those, the mind may “take actions” (to think further, to speak, or to act using
the body). Those are called vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Those saṅkhāra then lead to a defiled mindset or a “defiled viññāṇa” via the Paṭicca
Samuppāda (PS) process. Therefore, such “defiled viññāṇa” can arise only via PS
processes.
§ And that happens ONLY IF the mind gets attached to that sense input (an attractive
figure, a pleasing sound, tasty food, nice smell, soothing touch, or an important past event
(or planned future event).
6. Please read the above points in #5 very carefully again and again, until the concept is understood.
This is the key to understanding the key Pāli words saṅkhāra and viññāṇa and also the concept of
Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ Whenever we willingly grasp something (or whenever we get attached to something), whatever
results from that action has corresponding nature. Because one got attached willingly, a similar
bhava (existence) will result: i.e., pati+icca leading to sama+uppāda or Paṭicca Samuppāda
(PS).
§ Here, “pati+icca” means “getting attached willingly” and “sama+uppāda” means “giving rise
to a corresponding (similar) existence”. [uppāda :[m.] rising; coming into existence; birth.]
7. The “existence” one gets is according one’s own saṅkhāra that are generated according to one’s
mindset. As we have discussed before, first mano saṅkhāra arise automatically based on one’s gathi
(or gati) , when one gets attached to a sense event.
§ Then if one does not act with mindfulness (i.e., does not see the bad consequences of
generating such thoughts), one will start generating vacī saṅkhāra. If one’s emotions get
strong enough, one could start speaking (more vacī saṅkhāra), and even taking bodily actions
(kāya saṅkhāra). A deeper discussion at, “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ We will first consider a PS process that happens many times during a given lifetime. This PS
process is not discussed in the Visuddhimagga or any current English texts on Buddha
Dhamma.
8. In pavutti PS, bhava or existence refers to a “temporary existence” during a given lifetime.
Pavutti basically means “current”. [pavatti : [aor. of pavattati] moved on; proceeded; existed. (f.)
happening; incident; news.]
§ In the most fundamental sense, a “greedy state of mind” will result when we get attach with
greed, i.e., one develops a habit or gathi or bhava corresponding to that state of mind; a
“hateful state” (habit/gathi/bhava) results via hateful attachment; acts of greed and/or hate are
always done with ignorance.
§ The pavutti PS, which describes how we develop certain habits or bhava or gati during a given
lifetime. It is often easier to use an example to illustrate these PS cycles.
§ Pavutti PS is important because the habits (gati) that we cultivate during this lifetime can feed
the uppatti PS process leading to future rebirths. [uppatti :[f.] rebirth; coming forth; origin.]
9. Let us examine how a teenager becomes an alcoholic, using the pavutti PS. The teenager become
friendly with a group of other teenagers who are into drinking. Initially, he may be reluctant to join
in, but due to ignorance (avijjā) he joins them and starts drinking.
§ If a good friend or a family member came to know about the situation they could have
prevented the teenager from associating with such bad company, i.e., ignorance could have
been dispelled by explaining to him the adverse effects of not only drinking, but also of
associating with such a group.
§ Now we will examine in detail how this happens.
10. The PS cycle thus starts with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“; due to ignorance of the adverse results,
the teenager starts drinking with that group (saṅkhāra = “san + khāra” or actions of accumulating, in
this case bad kamma).
§ The more he is involved with such drinking activities, the more he thinks about it and develops
a “defiled mindset” or a “defiled viññāṇa” for that activity. This is “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa“.
§ This is explained in detail in the previous post: “Connection Between Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa“.
11. When he really begins to like drinking, he starts thinking about it even while doing other things.
This is “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“ step.
§ In this case, nāmarūpa are the mental images associated with that viññāṇa, i.e., the names and
shape of particular alcohol bottles, the places where he normally drinks, the friends who drink
with him, etc.
§ He also thinks about the next “event” and visualizes the scene, all these are associated
nāmarūpa. Thus, here nāmarūpa are the mental images of “things” and “concepts” that one
would like to enjoy.
§ “Nāma” means “name” assigned to a person/object, “rūpa” means “spatial profile” associated
with that nāma.
§ “Nāmarūpa” are the “mental images” together with the associated feelings (vedanā),
perceptions (saññā), saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa, the COMBINED effect of “nāma” and “rūpa“.
12. Now his six senses become “involved” to provide a reality to those nāmarūpa; to provide the
desired sense pleasures. In Pāli terms, the six indriya (senses) become “āyatana“. For a lack of a
single English word, I will call an “āyatana” an “import/export facility”, and really get involved in
the actions associated with drinking events.
§ Eyes are used as indriya when they are used just to identify things out there. When eyes are
used to repeatedly look at an object TO ENJOY IT, then the eyes are used as “āyatana”.
§ His mind is often thinking about the next “event” (where, when, with whom, etc), he makes
necessary preparations for the “event” using all six senses (now āyatanas), that are in
accordance with the nāmarūpa.
§ Therefore, this is the “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“ step, where saḷāyatana means the six
āyatana: the eye is now not merely for seeing, it has become an assistant in the lookout for a
“good drink” or a “good friend to chat with”, etc.
13. Then we have “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa“, i.e., all six āyatana become actively engaged
making contact with relevant sense objects.
§ His eyes are on the lookout for a favorite drink or a favorite person to chat with, etc. Here
instead of phassa, it is (more appropriately) called “samphassa” (= “san” + “phassa“), where
“san” implies it not just contact, but a “san” contact.
§ This may be a good time to review the term “san“, if you have not already done so: “What is
“San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
14. Such “samphassa” lead to vedanā (feelings), i.e., “(san)phassa paccayā vedanā“. He experiences
“good (but immoral) feelings” with all those sense contacts.
§ Because of such “good feelings”, he gets further attached: “vedanā paccayā taṇhā“; see,
“Taṇhā – How We Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
15. Now comes, “taṇhā paccayā upādāna“. Upādāna means “grabbing or getting hold of something
automatically” like an octopus grabbing its prey with all its eight legs.
§ In the present case, the teenager wants very much to re-live this experience, and he gets
immersed in it; when he is experiencing the event his mind is totally absorbed in it; he does not
think, and does not have the mindset to think about, any adverse consequences. This is the
critical “habit forming” or “bhava forming” step.
16. So, the next inevitable step is, “upādāna paccayā bhavo“; this particular state of getting drunk
becomes more and more ingrained in his mind. It becomes “a bhava” or “existence” or habit that is of
importance to him. He very much wants to re-live that experience.
§ And that is exactly what he gets: “bhava paccayā jāti“. This “bhava” or the kamma seed is now
well established, and he can be born in that state quite easily. All he needs is an invitation from
a friend, or even a sight of a bar while travelling, for example.
§ It is natural to get into that state, or be “born” in that state. So, he gets drunk at every
opportunity. See, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and (Repeated) Births Therein” for
more details.
17. However, like everything else, any birth is subjected to decay and suffering: “jāti paccayā jarā,
marana.., eva me tassa dukkhandha samudhayo hoti“, i.e., “the whole mass of suffering”.
§ But in the case of a single drinking event, that state of intoxication comes to an end, possibly
with a big headache and a huge hangover. That episode ends with nothing to show for it, but a
hangover.
§ Even worse, now he is “hooked’; he has formed a bad habit, which only strengthens even more
if he does it again and again. Because each time, the PS runs, the viññāṇa for that habit gets
more fuel, and the bhava gets stronger.
18. The more the teenager gets trapped in that bhava, the more jāti that occurs, i.e., more frequently
he will be drunk.
§ And it is not even necessary to participate in a “drinking event” to run another PS cycle. He
may be sitting at a desk trying to study, and may start going through the PS cycle MENTALLY.
§ He can start right at “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and be generating vacī saṅkhāra (vitakka/vicāra
or planning), thus generating (and strengthening) the viññāṇa for drinking, generating
nāmarūpa (visuals of places, friends, alcohol bottles, etc), and thus going through the rest of the
cycle: saḷāyatana, samphassa, vedanā, taṇhā, upādāna, bhava, jāti (“living it”), repeatedly.
§ Thus numerous such PS cycles can run at any time, probably increasing its frequency as the
bhava or the habit builds up. The stronger the bhava or habit is, it will be harder to break it.
§ This is why meditation together with another good habit to work on should be undertaken to
replace a bad habit. While in meditation, one can contemplate the adverse consequences of the
bad habit.
19. It is important to realize that the above PS cycle does not run to its conclusion when the drinking
“event” is over. Rather the cycle can run repeatedly unless it is stopped willfully, deliberately.
§ And the way to do that is to act with “mindfulness” and stop those bad first conscious
thoughts (vacī saṅkhāra) that start arising. This is the key to “real Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna
meditations” in Buddha Dhamma.
§ Then one would be stopping the “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step. That will stop “bad viññāṇa”
from arising or being cultivated by the elimination of “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” step. That
will of course stop the end result of suffering.
20. If those abhisaṅkhāra cultivated get strong enough, they can lead to future births as well. The
rebirth process proceeds via the uppatti PS process, which is very similar; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ Therefore, it is the same principle that will eventually stop “long-term suffering” in the rebirth
process via the uppatti PS process.
4.1.6 Breath Meditation Is Addictive and Harmful in the Long Run
I receive many questions from people who insist that breath meditation “works”. It is true that breath
meditation can provide a relief which can be exhilarating for those who have not experienced a
“permanent cooling down”. The latter is harder to get and require a determined effort, but will be a
permanent solution to the “problem of existential suffering”.
Introduction
1. Doing breath meditation to achieve a “temporary relief” from the “suffering in this world” is like
taking an aspirin or a tylenol or a sleeping pill to get relief from a headache that has a root cause in
the onset of cancer in the body.
§ One needs to get long-term medical treatment in order to get rid of the cancer. Then the
headaches will also go away.
§ In the same way, in order to stop future suffering from arising, one needs to remove defilements
(greed, hate, and ignorance) from one’s mind. Then all the mental stresses will also go away
permanently.
§ It makes sense to get a temporary relief using a pill, but one MUST start working on a long-
term solution for the root cause of cancer.
§ In the same way, it is OK to do a bit of breath meditation to deviate the mind from a stressful
situation, but it is unwise to use it as a long-term solution.
2. The problem here is that many people get “addicted” to breath meditation, just as a drug addict
starts an addiction by getting used to “taking a pill” to get to a “ecstatic state of mind” for a few
hours.
§ The problem is that the drug addict will have to keep increasing the dose with time, in order to
get the “same kick”.
§ Even though breath meditation is not directly harmful like drug addiction, it is harmful in the
sense that it will shift the focus from the main goal of a permanent solution to the “problem of
suffering”.
§ Furthermore, breath meditation can lead to anariya jhāna and that is definitely a trap. Once
people start enjoying jhāna, they even equate that to Nibbāna. I will discuss this later on.
§ The Buddha always analyzed a given problem in detail, so that one could get a clear picture of
the whole situation. So, let us analyze possible causes for the agitation of the mind.
Heating of the Mind Due to Too Many Sense Inputs
3. The mind can focus on only one thing at a time. However, it SEEMS that we can see, hear, smell,
taste, touch, and also think about concepts all at the same time.
§ For example, when watching a movie, we see and hear the movie, and also be thinking about
the movie plot. If we are eating popcorn, we can touch, smell, and taste popcorn too. So it
SEEMS that we are using all six sense faculties “at the same time”.
§ But we have that perception of a mind engaged in all at once only because the mind is VERY
FAST. It can go back and forth among the six sense inputs at an incredibly fast rate.
§ The Buddha said that the mind is the fastest entity in the world.
4. But in the above example, the mind (or more accurately the brain) gets overworked. All those
sense inputs need to be processed by the brain, which is like a computer. You may have seen that a
computer can get “overheated” when it is running too many applications at the same time.
§ This is why we cannot watch movies all day long. If we watch even two movies without a
break, we are likely to get a massive headache. The brain gets overloaded.
§ So, this is one kind of stress that we feel. It is simply due to the mind (and the brain) trying to
process too many sense inputs.
§ There is another, more important, way that a mind can get stressed. This may not be obvious to
many. Let us discuss that now.
Heating of the Mind Due to Greed, Hate, and Ignorance
5. Do you remember the last time when you got really mad? How did that feel? You get hot. Whole
body becomes hot and agitated; blood pressure goes up; face becomes dark, because the blood
becomes dark (By the way, this is clear evidence that the mind can affect the body).
§ This “burning up” is called “tāpa” in Pāli (pronounced “thāpa”; තාප in Sinhala), and is due to
greed, hate, and ignorance. “Ātāpi” means the opposite, “cooling down via getting rid of those
defilements”.
§ This is the “fire” discussed i n detail in the WebLink: suttacentral: Ādittapariyaya Sutta (SN
35.28).
§ Therefore, “ātāpī sampajāno” means “remove the fire or heat” from one’s mind by being aware
of the ‘san‘ or “immoral tendencies”.
§ When someone can get to the “ātāpi sampajāno” state, one feels calm and “cooled down”; see,
“Kāyānupassanā – The Section on Habits (Sampajānapabba)“ and other sections in “Mahā
Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
6. When one acts with greed, “heating up” still happens, may be to a lesser extent than when one is
angry. As a kid, when I was stealing something, I felt heated and uncomfortable.
§ Same is true when one acts with ignorance too. One is not certain whether that is the right thing
to do; the mind goes back and forth: is this right or wrong? should I do it or not? This is called
“vicikicchā” in Pāli. Because one does not really know, one is not certain, one becomes
anxious, and the body gets heated up.
§ On the other hand, do you remember how you felt when you made someone happy, either via a
good deed or word? You yourself cooled down; it felt good. Didn’t you feel the opposite of
when you got mad?
7. Thus, when one gives up acting with hate, greed, or ignorance, one becomes less agitated, at ease,
with a sense of peacefulness. One can enhance this calmness by also engaging in moral deeds – this is
sīla or moral conduct.
§ Giving up an immoral lifestyle and engaging in moral activities is the basis for getting to
Nibbāna, the ultimate “cooling down”.
§ As one can see the benefits of cooling down, one will avoid actions done with hate, greed, and
ignorance. And one will be looking forward to do actions of goodwill, generosity, and with
mindfulness.
§ Avoiding greed, hate, and ignorance is the same as avoiding dasa akusala.
§ We all have see a “ring of fire” at some circuses. The performer rotates a long stick with
burning torch and it looks like a “ring”. Yet, we know that it is not really a “ring”, but it is just
the fast rotation that “fools our eyes” to be seen as a continuous ring.
§ The light is coming from only one point on the circle at a given time. But we see it as a
continuous ring; see #13 of “Do I Have “A Mind” That Is Fixed and “Mine”?“.
9. In the same way, at a given instant, only one sense input is processed by the mind: seeing ,hearing,
smelling, tasting, touching, or contemplating. They come in packets of about a few millisecond (a
millisecond is a thousandth of a second).
§ Yes. Scientists have done systematic studies in recent years to confirm this picture that the
Buddha explained in Abhidhamma 2500 years ago!
10. For example, we may see a snapshot of the movie at a given instant. A few milliseconds later, we
hear a word, followed by the brief smelling of popcorn. and so on. They go through the mind very
fast, and we FEEL LIKE we are experiencing all those at the same time.
§ The mind is able to sort all those different sense inputs and present a cohesive continuous
picture. That is the magic of the mind.
§ Even just the movie itself is a series of static pictures projected on the screen at a fast rate,
above 20 frames per second. If we slow down the projector, we will be able to see individual
frames very similar to a picture taken by a camera.
§ A movie camera just takes 24 frames a second. When those are projected on the screen, it
appears to be continuous.
11. This is why the Buddha said that the mind is like a magician. The fast mind is able to give us the
impression of experiencing many things at the same time. But it is really a series of discrete events
happening VERY FAST.
§ All those sense inputs need to be processed by the brain for the mind to experience them.
§ If there are too many, that leads to stress in the mind and in the brain. This is why one could get
a headache by watching too many movies or television programs.
§ Even if it is just one sense input (say, looking at an attractive person and generating lustful
thoughts), that itself can lead to stress (even though most people do not feel it that way). Here
the real stress is masked by one’s anticipation of sense pleasures.
Why Breath Meditation “Works” on a Temporary Basis
12. Now we have discussed three things that come in to play.
§ A mind (with the help of the brain) can process only one sense input at a time. But it processes
a large number of them in a second so that we have the illusion that we are experiencing many
things at the same time.
§ If the mind is experiencing many sense inputs (called ārammaṇa in Pāli) — like watching a
movie and eating popcorn — both the brain and mind get stressed out or get “overheated”.
§ Another type of “heating” happens with greedy, hateful, and ignorant thoughts. Even if one is
just focused on one thing (say anger on someone), the mind gets heated internally and that is
called “tāpa” in Buddha Dhamma.
13. When we focus the mind on breath, we are forcing the mind to “stay focused on just feeling the
breath”. The mind is staying on one “thought object” and not running back and forth among many.
Also the brain virtually has no “load” to process.
§ This also avoids the more subtle yet important “heating up” is due to greedy, hateful, or
ignorant thoughts from coming to the mind.
14. Now we can see why “breath meditation works” on a temporary basis.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 301
§ It disengages the mind from too many sense inputs, and forces to stay on one task. That is
really the easiest to see.
§ Furthermore, it also removes the possibility of sensual, hateful or even ignorant thoughts
arising in the mind. The mind is SIMPLY OCCUPIED with one harmless sense input:
monitoring the breath or something like that.
§ You can prove this for yourself by focusing the mind on the up and down movement of your
belly. In mundane kasina meditation, yogis focus the mind on a kasina object. Since most of
you are used to breath meditation, it may appear to be better, but if you spend time doing any
other type, with time you will get used to it.
Breath Meditation: Addictive and No Long-Term Benefits
15. As you can see, “breath meditation” can be effective in solving the first problem: It can keep the
mind on a single focus.
§ While it can find a temporary solution to the problem of “internal heat generation” (tāpa), by
SUPPRESSING the root causes (greed, hate, and ignorance), it is not able to permanently
remove them.
§ Then they can be “triggered” (or made to come to surface) when a strong sense input (like
seeing an attractive figure). The the “agitation” will come back.
§ There is a second problem: When we have those lurking in our minds, we tend to do dasa
akusala too, which will also lead to more suffering in the future.
§ Therefore, REMOVING (instead of just suppressing) greed, hate, and ignorance will benefit in
the short term as well as in the long term.
§ That permanent solution is in the real Ānāpānasati bhāvanā in Buddha Dhamma.
16. As we discussed earlier, someone in pain feels the need to keep taking pain relievers to avoid the
pain. A drug addict feels the need to keep taking drugs to maintain the “high”.
§ In the same a way, a person engaged in breath meditation feels the need to do it on a regular
basis to “maintain the calmness”.
§ If one does this all day long for several days (while at a retreat), one really starts feeling a
“sense of great relief”.
§ But when one leaves the retreat and gets back to the “rat race”, all those agitations come back.
§ I know several people who go to retreats to get “refueled” on a regular basis. Getting addicted
to breath meditation can be harmful in that way. One is wasting precious time in doing
something that will only provide a short-term solution AND is preventing one from undertaking
a long-term PERMANENT solution.
The Better Solution – Real Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna
17. The better way is to systematically get rid of the tendencies for such greedy, hateful, and ignorant
thoughts to come to mind and stay there.
§ That cannot be done in a few days. It needs an effort in two ways: First one needs to understand
why greed, hate, and ignorance (dasa akusala) give rise to “heating of the mind” or tāpa.
§ At the same time, one needs to live a moral life with minimum burdens. We will live only for
about 100 years at most. Is there a point in amassing a huge sum of money or luxurious things
only to leave all that behind at death?
§ The more things one “owns”, the more stressful will be one’s mind. One’s mind will be
burdened all the time.
§ Of course, that does not mean one should endure poverty and suffering. We should ALWAYS
minimize suffering. That is the “middle way” prescribed by the Buddha.
18. This seems to be simple enough, and it is. But there is much more details on how one can increase
this “relief” or “cooling down” or “ātāpa“. But it is a step-by-step process.
§ The relief from this “heat” or “burning” can be felt especially after one really gets on the Noble
Path, by comprehending the root causes for this stress.
19. Many people tell me that they cannot focus their minds and do a mediation session without
focusing on the breath. If they try to meditate on a Dhamma concept, the mind tries to fly off in
different directions.
§ The solution is simple. It is not essential to do “formal meditation sessions” in the beginning.
§ In fact, if you read the WebLink: suttacentral: Sabbāsava Sutta (MN 2) carefully, you will see
that bhāvanā is essential only after the Sotāpanna stage (“āsavā dassanā pahātabbā“), in order
to get to the Sakadāgāmi stage and beyond (“āsavā bhāvanā pahātabbā“).
§ What is really needed is “contemplation” and “examination”, which is vimansa (also related to
dhammavicaya sabbojjanga), though that could be also called “bhāvanā”.
20. In any case, it is good to understand and practice the real Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā
(what to take in to the mind and keep/what to be rejected from the mind) even before getting to
the Sotāpanna stage.
§ The most important first thing is to learn true Buddha Dhamma and live a moral life (sīla) while
engaging in meritorious deeds like giving and helping out others in need.
§ This will help maintain one’s focus on learning Dhamma concepts first. Then one would be
able to do formal meditation sessions without the help of breath meditation.
4.1.7 Ānāpānasati Eliminates Mental Stress Permanently
January 21, 2019
Introduction
1. In the last post we discussed how focusing the mind on breath CAN calm a mind. But we also saw
that any relief one gets is temporary. Here we discuss the Ānāpānasati that is in the WebLink:
suttacentral: Ānāpānasati Sutta (MN 118).
§ We also briefly discussed in the previous post the idea that in order to permanently REDUCE
and eventually REMOVE the “mental stress” we need to purify our minds.
§ Here we will discuss some details, and show the connection to dasa akusala and Paṭicca
Samuppāda, key concepts in Buddha Dhamma.
§ You may want to read the earlier post:”Breath Meditation Is Addictive and Harmful in the
Long Run”.
2. From the sutta (MN 118): “Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti
mahānisaṃsā. Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā cattāro satipaṭṭhāne paripūreti. Cattāro
satipaṭṭhānā bhāvitā bahulīkatā satta bojjhaṅge paripūrenti. Satta bojjhaṅgā bhāvitā bahulīkatā
vijjāvimuttiṃ paripūrenti.“
Translated:
“Bhikkhus, when Ānāpānassati is developed and cultivated, it is of great benefit leading to ultimate
release. When Ānāpānassati is developed and cultivated, it fulfils cattāro satipaṭṭhāna (the four
foundations of mindfulness). When the four foundations of mindfulness are developed and
cultivated, they fulfil the seven enlightenment factors (satta bojjhaṅga). When the seven
enlightenment factors are developed and cultivated, they fulfill ultimate knowledge and release
(vijjāvimuttiṃ paripūrenti)“.
§ So, Ānāpānassati and Satipaṭṭhāna are the same and both lead to Nibbāna (Arahanthood).
Satipaṭṭhāna describes the steps in more detail, but the key is to first understand what is meant
by Ānāpāna.
§ Here we discuss the basic ideas of Ānāpānassati bhāvanā. Details at: “Bhāvanā (Meditation)“.
4. The root cause of anger is greed. We get mad when someone or something gets in our way to
prevent us from getting something that we really crave. Therefore, vyāpāda (anger) arises out of
abhijjhā (greed).
§ Note that abhijjhā and vyāpāda are the first two of pañcanīvaraṇa (five “hindrances”): they
are a “hindrance” to a calm state of mind!
§ Furthermore, vyāpāda can bring rebirths in the niraya (hell), while greed can bring rebirths as
hungry ghosts (in preta or peta realms). Thus vyāpāda is worse than abhijjhā.
Why Some People Get Angry Than Others?
5. As the Buddha always pointed out, in order to eliminate a problem, we must first find the causes
that gave rise to that problem. Then when we eliminate those causes, the problem will NOT ARISE
anymore. That is the meaning of the word, “nirodha” (“nir” + “udā“). Dukkha nirodha is
“eliminating future suffering”.
§ When one understands dukkha samudaya (“san” + udaya” or how “san” give rise to suffering),
then one can understand dukkha nirodha or how to stop suffering from arising; see, “What is
“San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Samsāra)“.
§ The tendency to get angry is a gati (pronounced “gathi“), which can be loosely translated as a
“character quality”, which gets established firmly if one has made it to be a habit.
§ The more angry one gets (this is what is really meant by “āna” in Ānāpānasati), more will the
“tendency to get angry” becomes. This is important to understand.
6. This has been established in neuroscience in recent years. Our brains (or more accurately neural
circuits in the brain) get “wired” for certain habitual activities. The more we do something, the
easier it becomes to do it again.
§ That holds not only for “defiled activities” like getting angry, to “getting addicted to do
something on a regular basis like smoking and drinking, to eating too much, or even harmless
(and useful) habits like driving.
§ For example, after one learns to drive, it becomes a habit. When we drive, we are mostly on
“auto pilot”, especially if it is a regular drive like driving to work every day. Here is an article
that is an easy read: “WebLink: healthtransformer.co: The Neuroscience of Behavior Change“.
7. Therefore, the trick to stop getting angry is to “try to stop that anger when one becomes aware that
one is angry” (this is what is really meant by “āpāna” or put out or get rid of, in Ānapāna, which
comes from “āna” + “āpāna“). Many Pāli words are shortened to rhyme.
§ The long-term solution is to think about the CONSEQUENCES of such an angry mindset, and
focus one’s attention deliberately on a neutral or a “pleasing thought object”, say visualizing a
calm Buddha image in one’s mind.
§ If such an angry mindset comes to one’s mind while in a formal meditation session, then one
COULD do “breath meditation” for a few minutes to get the mind off of that mindset.
§ The easiest is to just to count to 10 in order to quickly stop the incoming thought and then to
think about the bad consequences of such an angry mindset.
§ The key point is that “stopping these angry thoughts from arising” MUST BE DONE any
time and all the time, whether one is in formal meditation or just engaged in regular
activities.
8. Thus a critical aspect of being able to stop such bad thoughts is to really understand the bad
CONSEQUENCES of having such thoughts (which would feed that bad viññāṇa and could even lead
to bad bodily actions).
§ Therefore, an understanding of the bad consequences of immoral deeds and thoughts (kamma
vipāka resulting from bad kamma) will be valuable.
§ See, for example: “Kanha (Dark) and Sukka (Bright) Kamma and Kammakkhaya” and “How
the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
How That Bad Viññāṇa Was Created in the First Place
9. Now we need to see how this “viññāṇa of enemy Y” is created and where it exists. This is what is
explained in Paṭicca Samuppāda. Don’t worry. It is easy to see this process.
§ Let us take an example. Persons X and Y were competing for something that they crave: a girl
friend, a job, an elected position, we can think about many possible scenarios. But suppose X
starts hating Y because Y is competing to win the heart of a girl.
§ Now, every day X is thinking about how to block Y from “getting the girl”. He may try to get Y
kicked out of his job or to physically hurt or even kill Y.
§ These conscious angry thoughts about Y are vacī saṅkhāra generated by X.
10. That is how a Paṭicca Samuppāda process starts with “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“.
§ The more one does any type of saṅkhāra (mano, vacī, and kāya), the more strong that “viññāṇa
of enemy Y” will become in X’s mind.
§ In simple terms, that means thinking about harming Y, speaking against Y, or doing something
to hurt Y. All those activities will help that “viññāṇa of enemy Y” to grow.
11. When X is consciously generating such “bad thoughts” about Y, then X will be imagining
(creating) scenarios in one’s mind of hurting Y in some way. This could be telling a lie about Y’s
character to the girl in question or his boss, for example. Or it could even be creating in his mind how
he will ambush Y and carry out a physical attack.
§ This is called creating “nāmarūpa” (creating various scenarios) in one’s mind: “viññāṇa
paccayā nāmarūpa“.
12. That will initiate the next step: “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“.
§ The more bad thoughts (vacī saṅkhāra) that X generates, his all six sense faculties (saḷāyatana
or six āyatana) will start getting involved. He will be looking to see (using cakkhāyatana)
whether Y is talking to that girl, and he may write a nasty email about Y to his boss (using
kāyāyatana), etc.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 305
§ Of course, some of these steps occur simultaneously, and go back and forth too. For example,
“nāmarūpa paccayā viññāṇa” happens as well as “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“. In other
words, more “nāmarūpa” X makes in his mind, his bad viññāṇa will grow too.
13. Each of such activities will lead to contact with “san” (his greed towards the girl and hate towards
Y), via “saḷāyatana paccayā (san)phassa” or “saḷāyatana paccayā samphassa“.
§ That invariably leads to the next step: “samphassa paccayā vedanā“, which is also known as
“samphassa ja vedanā“, i.e., X is now generating a lot of “angry feelings that arise due to
hate“, which leads to “vedanā paccayā taṇhā“.
14. It is important to note that “taṇhā” is not just greed. Taṇhā really means “getting bonded to a
situation via greed or hate”.
§ Now X cannot let go of it, and now he pulls it even closer: “taṇhā paccayā upādāna“: upādāna
(“upa” + “ādāna“) means ‘pulling closer’ (in the mind).
§ This leads to the next critical step of “upādāna paccayā bhava“. This is where that “kammic
energy” that was initially created via the “viññāṇa of enemy Y” gets really established in the
kamma bhava. It is easier to just think of “kamma bhava” as a form of energy that stays out
there in the universe (just like visible rūpa are out there).
§ This energy is also called dhammā (with a long ā) that can come back to one’s mind at times.
That is how the “subconscious” works, and we will discuss that at a later time.
Paṭicca Samuppāda processes are described in detail at: “Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
Viññāṇa, Kamma Bhava, Kamma Bija – Related to Each Other
15. We can see that both viññāṇa and bhava are associated with kammic energy. The easiest way
to remember is that kamma bhava is where kammic energy is, and those various types of kammic
energies (good and bad) are kamma bija (seeds, pronounced “beeja”) in the kamma bhava. They
are waiting to bring kamma vipāka or the results of those kamma.
§ When we do good kamma (say donating food to needy), we also create good kamma bija in the
kamma bhava that can bring future “good vipāka” or “good results”.
§ Therefore, there are good and bad kamma bija (seeds) waiting in the kamma bhava, to bring in
kamma vipāka, so to speak.
§ Just like a seed can give rise to a plant, a kamma bija can give rise to a kamma vipāka. A
good seed will give rise to a good plant (something useful, say apples or grains), and a bad
seed will give rise to a bad plant (weeds).
16. When a kamma bija brings a kamma vipāka to the mind, it leads to a mindset that is compatible
with the kamma vipāka; that is viññāṇa.
§ Therefore, a viññāṇa can be good too (in a mundane sense), for example, when engaging
in a meritorious deed. We first need to get rid of “bad viññāṇa“. All viññāṇa are reduced
to “pure consciousness” at the Arahant stage. It may take some time to grasp this point.
§ Earlier we saw (#8-#13) that viññāṇa is the “initiator” of a kamma bija that is “deposited” in
the kamma bhava. Then that kamma bija will be waiting for right “conditions” to bring that
mindset back to the mind.
§ Then that mindset (viññāṇa) can lead to doing more saṅkhāra (and kamma) that will in turn
make that viññāṇa to grow; that will in turn lead to strengthening the corresponding kamma
bija in the kamma bhava.
§ Then a corresponding gati (or gathi) is established. It is important to understand what is meant
by gati. Then it will be easier to show different gathi (including the “angry gathi” of X that
we discussed above) are established.
See, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)“, “How Habits are
Formed and Broken – A Scientific View“, “Gati to Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“.
Putting It All Together – These Fundamentals Are Essential
17. So, now we are starting to see the connections among these different terms: saṅkhāra, viññāṇa,
bhava, kamma bija, gati, Ānāpānasati, etc.
§ Whenever you have time, you may want to go back and read relevant previous posts. With
repeated readings, things will become much more clear.
§ In the suttas, the Buddha used this pattern of repeating stuff over and over. That makes it easier
for these concepts to sink in.
§ Please don’t hesitate to ask questions if something is not clear.
18. Understanding Buddha Dhamma is all about understanding the steps in Paṭicca
Samuppāda:
“Yo paticcasamuppādam passati,
so Dhammam passati.
Yo Dhammam passati,
so paticcasamuppādam passati”
“One who sees paticcasamuppāda
sees the Dhamma.
One who sees the Dhamma
sees paticcasamuppāda.”
(WebLink: suttacentral: Mahāhatthipadopama Sutta (MN 28); at the end)
§ If one to understands Paṭicca Samuppāda, one needs to understand all these key terms like
saṅkhāra, viññāṇa, bhava, kamma bija, gati, Ānāpānasati, etc.
§ Other relevant posts are listed below. The more one reads and contemplates on, the more
one will be able to understand:
1. Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (DN 22) just describes in more detail the Ānāpānasati bhāvanā that is in
the Ānāpānasati Sutta (MN 118).
§ This post discusses the fundamentals related to both suttas. More details at: “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta“.
2. One synonym for Nibbāna is “cooled state”, which means the mind is “permanently cooled down”.
There can be no anger, greed, or ignorance can arise such a mind.
§ However, we start at a more basic state. When we start doing real Ānāpāna/Satipaṭṭhāna, we
will start feeling a PERMANENT relief from our stressed minds.
§ On the other hand, “breath meditation” provides only a temporary relief.
3. We discussed how our thoughts can affect our minds in the previous post, “Breath Meditation Is
Addictive and Harmful in the Long Run“.
§ When angry thoughts arise, one’s whole body becomes hot and agitated; blood pressure goes
up; face becomes dark, because the blood becomes dark.
§ On the other hand, when one has compassionate thoughts in one’s mind, one’s mind feels joyful
and it shows up in the face too.
4. Some people are more prone to generating angry thoughts; others are more like to generate
compassionate thoughts. In other words, some people have “angry gati” while other have
“compassionate gati“. Previously we discussed that there are a wide variation of gati ranging from
very bad to very good.
§ Of course, these gati do not show up all the time. Even a person with “angry gati” must be
provoked for such angry thoughts to arise.
§ In Buddha Dhamma’s language, a person with “angry gati” has “anger hiding in the mind”
waiting for a trigger to come to the surface. These are called “anusaya” or “kilesa” (hidden
defilements).
§ The key word gati (pronounced “gathi”) is related to one’s habits and character; see “The Law
of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)“.
5. We can take an analogy to clarify this. Anusaya can be compared to dirt at the bottom of a glass of
water. If the glass is not disturbed, the dirt will settle at the bottom, and the water may look clean at
the top.
§ If there is a lot of dirt at the bottom of the glass, only a slight disturbance can make the dirt
come up and make the water dirty. But if it is only a little bit, most minor disturbances may not
make the water dirty.
§ Just like that, the more anusaya (or corresponding defilements) one has, it will be easier for
them to come to the surface. If one has “very angry gati“, that person would be easy to be
angered.
6. On the other hand, if there is no dirt at the bottom of the glass, no matter what kind of disturbance
it is, the water will remain pure.
§ The mind of an Arahant is like that. He/she can live totally unaffected surrounded by the
world’s most tempting sense objects.
§ We have a long way to get to the Arahant stage. But we can start getting rid of these “bad gati”
or “anusaya” or “defilements” by cultivating the correct Ānāpāna/Satipaṭṭhāna.
§ When one’s mind becomes purified, it will be hard to make that person agitated or depressed.
One will have a relatively calm mindset even under normally stressful conditions.
7. Even though a glass of water has dirt in it, if the water is left undisturbed for a while, the dirt gets
settled at the bottom and the water becomes relatively clear.
§ That is what happens with “breath meditation”. One focuses one’s mind on a neutral thought
object for a while and all “agitations” subside. But they do not go away.
§ Breath meditation appears to provide relief. In particular, if one goes to a retreat and spends
several days with one’s mind removed from “enticing” AND “angry” thoughts, one feels a high
sense calmness.
§ However, when one comes back and gets into the usual “rat race”, with all kinds of enticing
and aggravating inputs from the environment, all those anusaya” come back to the surface!
8. In real Ānāpāna/Satipaṭṭhāna, those anusaya or “hidden defilements” will be REMOVED
gradually. The procedure involves the following:
§ Get rid of bad thoughts (such as anger) that may arise due to whatever reasons.
§ Let any “good thoughts” that may arise (such as compassion or just thoughts about dhamma
concepts) to continue.
§ Deliberately contemplate on Dhamma concepts like dasa akusala, gati, anusaya, kilesa,
kamma, kamma vipāka, Noble Truths, Noble Eightfold Path, Paṭicca Samuppāda, etc.
§ We will see in upcoming posts, how those “three components” are taken into account in the
four types of Satipaṭṭhāna: kāyānupassanā, vedanānupassanā, cittānupassanā, and
dhammānupassanā.
9. If a bad thought comes to the mind, one must think about the bad consequences of keeping such
thoughts in one’s mind and forcefully remove them. For example, if someone says something to make
one angry, one could count to ten in one’s mind (or just walk away) and not retaliate.
§ This is hard to do first. But with practice, one can see the benefits and one will be motivated to
continue.
§ The nice thing is that the more one trains, the easier it becomes to control one’s impulsive
reactions.
10. In order to get rid of any bad habit (which are related to gati), it will be VERY HELPFUL to see
the bad consequences of such bad habits.
§ A smoker needs to convince himself that smoking can lead to various health problems,
including cancer. That will be an incentive to get rid of smoking.
§ Taking drugs is even worse, one could die with many health problems if one becomes addicted
to drugs.
§ Even eating too much is a bad habit. One should look at the statistics that clearly show the bad
health consequences of over-eating.
11. Learning Dhamma is like learning the bad consequences of bad habits. When one is engaged in
immoral activities, one will have bad consequences of those actions, speech, and thoughts in two
ways:
§ Even if one is making a lot money doing immoral things, one WILL have a stressed mind even
in this life.
§ The more important consequences may realize in future lives. Highly immoral activities lead to
births in the four bad realms (animal realm is one).
§ Therefore, it is essential to learn true Buddha Dhamma, where one can begin to understand
kamma and kamma vipāka.
12. Another way to say this is that one needs to see the difference between “dhamma” and
“adhamma“. Dhamma are the “good, moral deeds” and adhamma are the “bad immoral deeds”.
§ Note that dhamma here is different from the Buddha Dhamma, even though they are related.
Adhamma are opposite of dhamma.
§ As we have discussed before, adhamma lead to a stressed mind and dhamma lead to a calm
mind at the very basic level.
§ At the next level, strong adhamma or “highly immoral deeds” have very bad consequences in
the future, especially in future lives (rebirths in the lowest 4 realms). On the other hand, strong
dhamma or “highly moral deeds” lead to good rebirths in the higher realms.
§ I have discussed them previously. It would be beneficial to review them.
“How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
“Does the Hell (Niraya) Exist?“.
“Dasa Akusala/Dasa Kusala – Basis of Buddha Dhamma“.
“Gati to Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“
This post is critical. Before one can do Ānāpānasatisati or Satipaṭṭhāna meditations, one needs to
understand what is meant by “sati“.
Double Meanings of Words – Unique In Pāli with Deeper “Dhamma
Meanings”
1. Many Pāli words have “double meanings”. As we will see below, that happens in other languages
too.
§ However, the situation is unique in Pāli in the context of Buddha Dhamma, because some Pāli
words have deeper meanings that are just to do with Buddha Dhamma.
§ An example that we have already discussed is viññāṇa. The ordinary meanings is
“consciousness”, but the more profound meaning is “defiled consciousness”. In order to see the
context in a given situation, one must know both meanings; see, “Connection Between
Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa“.
§ Therefore, unlike in other languages, one must have a more in-depth knowledge of Buddha
Dhamma to see the deeper meanings of words like viññāṇa and sati.
2. One fundamental problem with English translations that we have today arises because most
translators try to use dictionary translations. Many times, a dictionary, a dictionary may not list all
possible meanings, especially the deeper meanings.
§ For example, in most Pāli dictionaries, “sati” is given the following two meanings:
mindfulness and attention.
§ However, there is another more profound meaning that is only approximated by “mindfulness'”
as we discuss below. The key is to figure out “mindful of what?”.
§ But let us first see why this is not a big problem in English (or any other language).
Type: He can type over 100 words per minute. That dress is really not her type.
§ To comprehend the deeper meaning of some keywords, one must learn and understand that
meaning.
§ It has nothing to do with one’s intelligence. If one has not heard that meaning from a Buddha or
a true disciple of a Buddha, one can NEVER figure that out by oneself.
§ Since “sati” is a critical Pāli word that appears in the context of Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna, we
should spend some time on it.
§ I have explained in the post, “Breath Meditation Is Addictive and Harmful in the Long Run“,
how “breath meditation” can provide a temporary relief, AND why that can be addictive and
bad in the long run.
§ For one to engage in true Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna, one must have a particular “mindset” IN
ADDITION to paying attention. That is being aware of the moral/immoral implications of
one’s thoughts, speech, and actions.
§ As we will see below, that true Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna also involves also speech and
bodily actions. The I riyāpatapabba
section in Satipaṭṭhāna
is ALL ABOUT physical actions.
That cannot be done by sitting down and focusing on the breath. We will discuss that later in
detail.
§We don’t need to start there. But one embarks on the Path by gradually removing those three
defilement from one’s mind.
§ One definition of Nibbāna is “cooling down (of the mind)”. That “cooling down” can be
experienced even at the beginning to some extent.
11. When one is attracted to a sense input (that is enticing OR repulsive), that WILL lead to a
burdened mind. Thoughts associated with greed or anger are unavoidable..
§ Therefore, one needs to be aware of such DEFILED thoughts, speech, and actions and stop
them as they arise. That is the key to true Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna.
§ That particular mindset is “sati“.
§ One must keep the attention (sati) on “good things” and remove attention away (asati) from
“bad things” too while keeping the “sati mindset.”
§ By the way, there is no “asati” cetasika or a “bad mental factor”; it has only the ordinary
meaning. Asati means keeping the mind away from any ārammaṇa or any “thought
object.”
§ Asati means “not being focused on a given thought object”. There is ONLY one meaning for
asati.
14. I hope one can clearly see why just paying attention or being mindful is not enough to cultivate
Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna.
§ One must understand that “cooling down of the mind” has its origins in staying away from dasa
akusala AND also actively engaged in moral deeds, speech, and thoughts.
§ In particular, it is essential to understand the importance of cultivating moral vacī saṅkhāra
(conscious thoughts and speech); see, “Connection Between Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa“.
15. When that is done consistently (keeping the mind on good things and off of bad things), over time
it leads to Sammā Sati. That, in turn, leads to Sammā Samādhi., completing the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ But one needs to know what is good and what is bad to be focused on. What is bad is dasa
akusala and what is good is dasa kusala, i.e., staying away from dasa akusala.
§ When one makes progress on the Path and starts comprehending Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha,
anatta), one’s sati will grow. That will be lead to better samādhi.
The Goal Is Not To Remove All Thoughts From the Mind
16. I also need to mention a common mistake some people make. They think they need to get
rid of ALL thoughts that come to the mind.
§ When one is engaged in Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna, one’s goals are two fold: get rid of evil
thoughts that come to the mind AND cultivate good thoughts.
§ Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna involves both “āna” or “assāsa” (taking in good things) and
“āpāna” or “passāsa” (discarding bad things).
17. Another way to say this is that one needs to see the difference between “dhamma” and
“adhamma”. Dhamma are the “good, moral deeds” and adhamma are the “bad, immoral deeds”.
§ As we have discussed before, adhamma leads to a stressed mind and dhamma leads to a calm
mind at a fundamental level.
§ At the next level, strong adhamma or “highly immoral deeds” have very terrible consequences
in the future, especially in future lives (rebirths in the lowest four realms). On the other hand,
strong dhamma or “highly moral deeds” lead to good rebirths in the higher realms.
§ We discussed dhamma/adhamma in the previous post. I want to mention another aspect of it
now.
What are Dhamma and Adhamma?
18. In many suttas, the Buddha has clearly stated that dasa akusala are adhamma, and that staying
away from those are dhamma. For example, in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Dhamma Sutta (AN
10.182)“: “katamo ca, bhikkhave, adhammo? Pāṇātipāto … pe … micchādiṭṭhi“, i.e., basically dasa
akusala.
§ There are many suttas where the Buddha describe adhamma as dasa akusala or opposites of the
eight factors in the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ On the other hand, dhamma are dasa kusala and the eight factors in the Noble Eightfold Path.
19. This act of keeping the mind (sati) on “good things” and keeping it away (asati) from “bad
things” is the key to Buddhist meditation: Satipaṭṭhāna, Anāpānasati.
§ Both require keeping the mind focused on “good things” and stopping it from focusing on “bad
things”.
§ When that is done consistently, over time it leads to Sammā Sati (or always keeping the mind
on good things), and then to Sammā Samādhi, completing the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ But one needs to know what is right and what is bad. What is bad is dasa akusala and what is
right is dasa kusala, i.e., staying away from dasa akusala.
Dhamma Are the Things to “Bear” and Adhamma Are the Things One
Should Not “Bear”
20. What is meant by “dhamma” here is “what one bears in the mind” or “the mindset.” One thinks,
speaks, and acts according to that mindset.
§ But as we have seen, what one thinks, speaks, and acts are called saṅkhāra. And “saṅkhāra
paccayā viññāṇa” means one’s viññāṇa are based on one’s saṅkhāra; see, “Connection
Between Saṅkhāra and Viññāṇa“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 313
§Then Paṭicca Samuppāda leads to “bhava paccayā jāti“. Therefore, when one generates “bad
saṅkhāra” one ends up creating “bad jāti” for oneself (both during this life and in future lives).
21. Now, “bad saṅkhāra” are generated when one bears “bad dhamma“. “Good saṅkhāra” are created
when one takes “good dhamma“.
§ That is really the basis of Paṭicca Samuppāda, and its connection to “sati“.
§ When one gradually gets rid of “bad dhamma” by staying away from dasa akusala, and
cultivates “good dhamma” by engaging in moral deeds, one cultivates “sati” via
Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpānasati.
August 5, 2016; Revised August 26, 2016 (This replaces the deleted post, “Introduction to a New
Approach to Meditation”).
1. This series started as a subsection in the “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” section. But I think it can be the
“step-by-step” by process of “learning and living” Dhamma starting from a very fundamental level.
One does not need to be bothered about too many Pāli words or deeper concepts at the beginning.
§ From many comments that I get, it is clear that many people have “road blocks” at concepts
like “kamma vipāka” and “rebirth”. When we start at a fundamental level, one does not need to
worry about them. One’s own change in experience — as we proceed — will hopefully help
clarify those concepts as we proceed.
§ All other sections at the website can be used to investigate and learn different aspects from
different angles. Buddha Dhamma is a self-consistent theory of nature. There are no
contradictions.
2. About a month ago, I started thinking about this approach based on emails from a few people about
their experiences. Many people feel the positive effect of meditation, but seem to be “stuck” without
being able to go past a certain point.
§ I must hasten to add that this “new approach” is fully consistent with Buddha Dhamma and not
an invention of mine. It is just another way and — hopefully a refreshing way — to look at how
to practice Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) with a clear understanding.
3. What got me started thinking was the following email from a person (X) who has been doing
mostly anariya meditation, including conventional metta bhāvanā (I am withholding the name for
obvious reasons); highlights are mine. Anariya meditation basically means doing meditation without
comprehending anicca nature, so most people start that way:
“..The other issue I wanted to ask you about was that I sometimes start wondering if meditation is just
dulling my mind, making me less sensitive to what others are doing around me, like a sedative
almost. Am I getting addicted to meditation that I need a constant dose, and when I stop I feel I am
missing something. for example when I was meditating regularly I no longer felt like reading books
or listening to music which I loved earlier so I felt like it was changing my core personality.
To experiment I stopped my formal meditation for a few weeks and I found that I began to get
agitated and anxious as before. I was also able to enjoy songs as before. I know that is consistent with
what you say about anariya meditations – that the effects are temporary.
So I am curious to ask you, have you experimented with stopping your meditation practice for a few
weeks? I am asking because I understand that you are doing the Ariya meditation and that those
effects should be more permanent. Or are you so used to your meditation practice that it would be a
torture to ask you to stop even for a few days let alone a few weeks. But the trouble is – if you never
stop how will you know if the effects are permanent or not…”
4. I am grateful to X for sharing this beautifully written description. I believe many people have
experienced such thoughts at various times. Our tendency to always go back to sense pleasures is
very strong, because that is what we have been doing through uncountable rebirths in the kāma loka
in the past.
§ Whether it is Ariya or anariya meditation (including even breath meditation), the tranquility of
mind (peace of mind) that comes during a meditation session is due to the suppression of the
five hindrances (pancanivarana); see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
§ In simple terms, the five hindrances are: sense cravings, tendency to be angry, sleepy or dull
mind, scattered mind, and the inability to decide the right action. They are always in the
background, “covering the mind” and constantly making the mind “agitated and anxious” as X
described above.
§ What happens during a meditation session (or even if one a fully focused on some task that
does not involve sense pleasures), is that the mind is taken off of all such hindrances
temporarily. This is actually the first stage where one could experience the “cooling down” or
“nivana” or “niveema“. It can be called a mundane version of Nibbāna. This is also called
“nirāmisa sukha“; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ When one is on a regular meditation program (or in a meditation retreat), that “cooling down”
can last during that whole time — days or weeks — outside the meditation sessions.
5. Another person (Y) asked the following related question: “Nirāmisa sukha is felt by which citta?”.
§ Nirāmisa sukha is not experienced by a specific citta. Rather, nirāmisa sukha APPEARS when
cittas BECOME free of defilements, i.e., when the mind becomes (at least temporarily) free of
hindrances; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“. We will go into details in
upcoming posts, but this is a CRITICAL point.
§ More examples: Water becomes clear and pleasant when all the dirt is removed. One feels good
when a headache goes away; that relief was not gained by adding something, but by removing
the headache.
§ Similarly, nirāmisa sukha is felt when hindrances and defilements are SUPPRESSED
temporarily. When those are removed PERMANENTLY in four stages, one feels more
permanent happiness of Nibbāna. At the Sotāpanna stage, a big junk of stresses associated with
defilements are PERMANENTLY removed. At the Arahant stage, ALL defilements are
PERMANENTLY removed, and the “cooling down” is complete.
§ Thus it is going to be a gradual process. It is a mistake to try to go all the way all at once. Don’t
even think about the Arahant stage (let alone the Anāgāmī stage where one has removed kāma
rāga or attachment to sense pleasures), but concentrate on attaining the Sotāpanna stage.
§ For many, even before that one needs to experience the nirāmisa sukha. That is what we focus
on initially.
§ It is when kamachanda and other nivarana are suppressed that one is able to experience
the nirāmisa sukha, grasp the anicca nature, and become a Sotāpanna. This is easier when
one abstain from dasa akusala too.
§ Thus, in order to grasp the anicca nature (i.e., to suppress the nivarana), the mind needs to be
purified to some extent. Person X above is almost there, but you can see how hard for X to be
not be tempted by sense pleasures.
6. I will go into details in the upcoming posts in this section, but through countless rebirths we have
cultivated a craving for sense pleasures that inevitably lead to the five hindrances, that cover our
minds and not letting us see the real nature of this world. Sense pleasures have the following key
characteristics:
§ They are definitely “pleasurable”, i.e., the sense experience is palpable and enjoyable. The
Buddha himself said that beings will not be trapped in this suffering-filled rebirth process
unless they are seduced by these pleasurable sense contacts.
§ The price we pay for that “happy feeling” is that the mind gets excited and restless.
Furthermore, that pleasurable feeling cannot be maintained for long times; we get tired of it no
matter what it is. Think about anything (food, sex, watching movies, etc), and you will realize
that soon we would have had enough of it and we just move onto some other pleasurable
activity or “just take a rest”.
§ But that experience is addictive. The urge to do it again comes back very strong at later times.
If we cannot experience it at that time, we at least tend to recall the past experience and try to
enjoy that. This is due to the fact that we have a reservoir of mental impurities (kilesa) in our
minds, as we discuss in an upcoming post.
§ Until one can realize the dangers in at least excessive sense pleasures (anicca, dukkha, anatta
nature), one’s mind is easily tempted by those sense pleasures; one is afraid that one will
“miss out” on the sense pleasures. This is what X was trying to convey above.
7. The meditation experience is the totally opposite of sense pleasures. Nirāmisa sukha can be
maintained as long as one stays in the “meditation mindset”. But it is not an “enjoyment” in the sense
of a sense pleasure. It is really a “peace of mind” (one could actually feel a bodily sukha sensation in
a jhāna, but we will discuss that later). This is why X is tempted by them, even though they lead to
general agitation of the mind (see the first highlighted sentences in #3 above).
§ Nirāmisa sukha BECOMES addictive (i.e., preferable over sense pleasures) only AFTER
getting to the Sotāpanna stage (at which time it can be called beginning of the “Nibbāna sukha”
or “nivan suva“). At that time, even though one may still be tempted by sense pleasures until
the Anāgāmī stage, one will ALWAYS go back to meditation for relief. Until then it is always a
battle that is so eloquently expressed by X in #3 above.
§ Furthermore, at that stage one will have voluntarily given up some of more excessive sense
pleasures. This is something that just happens. One needs to forcefully give up only those
things that are directly harmful to oneself or to others. For example, sexual MISCONDUCT
needs to be forcefully given up, but not sex (We recall that one of the main upāsikā of the
Buddha, lady Visaka, attained the Sotāpanna stage at age 7, but got married and had 22
children). The urge for sexual pleasure will AUTOMATICALLY go away only at the Anāgāmī
stage.
§ Of course, one could start discarding some “conventionally pleasurable” but not directly
harmful things like watching TV or going to concerts etc. (as X stated in #3 above). I also
experienced the same kind of things in early practice. I would rather learn Dhamma than watch
TV even in the early days. “pleasure of Dhamma” is different.
§ However, I still get pulled into a limited number of sense pleasures occasionally, so I know
how hard it is to resist especially those activities that one has gotten used to. Getting rid of all
kāma rāga (i.e., reaching the Anāgāmī stage) is the hardest. But once the anicca nature is
comprehended to some extent, it becomes easy to discard most things as a waste of time.
8. Therefore, in the beginning it could be a “tug of war” between those addictive sense pleasures that
we are used to enjoy and the long-lasting but not so addictive nirāmisa sukha of meditation. Here,
meditation also includes listening, reading, and contemplation of Dhamma.
§ As one’s mind gets more and more cleansed, the “joy of Dhamma” WILL increase. One WILL
BE able to grasp deeper and deeper meanings even from the same discourse or a post.
§ The time to contemplate on anicca (and Tilakkhaṇa in general) is when one starts “liking
Dhamma”, with the pancanivarana temporarily lifted. If one starts forcing the mind to accept
the anicca nature, that may not be successful, and one may get discouraged. Of course, each
person is different and some may be able to do it.
9. Finally, in X’s last (highlighted) statement in #3 above, the question was: If I stopped meditating
for two weeks, would I be able to “switch back to enjoying sense pleasures” as X did?
§ I am quite sure I could abstain from meditating for two weeks if I really wanted to. But, such an
abstinence would not change “my core”. It just cannot. Sometimes when I go on a trip with my
family, I do not get to meditate for several days. For example, last month there was a break of
about 7-8 days during such a trip. But when I get back, I automatically get back to my normal
schedule of meditation.
§ In addition, most of my “mediation” is not formal. I think about Dhamma concepts whenever
there is time, sitting in a car, just before falling asleep, first thing when I wake up, etc.
§ Furthermore, I don’t feel “missed out” on those cravings that I have lost, even though I can still
experience that “sense pleasure”. For example, while I was working I used to have an alcoholic
beverage daily for over 30 years, even though I did not really get “drunk”; it was just a habit.
Nowadays, that habit has automatically disappeared. Still, If I am out with an old friend (who
does not know that I have changed) and he has a drink, I may have one just to keep him
company. But the “urge” to have a drink at the end of the day is never coming back. A big
chunk of “mental impurities” (or kilesa) have permanently been removed from my mind.
10. What we are going to do is to look closely at what these defilements are that needs to be removed
in order to purify the mind, so that those pancanivarana will be permanently lifted and the mind can
grasp deeper and deeper concepts easily.
§ It is easier to solve a problem when one figures out what the problem is, and the root causes
that lead to the problem.
§ Our problem here is the defiled mind. The root causes are the mental impurities (or kilesa,
keles, or klesha in Pāli, Sinhala, and Sanskrit respectively) that have accumulated in our minds
over the beginning-less rebirth process. These are ultimately responsible for the five hindrances
(pancanivarana) that cover our minds.
§ We will discuss these kilesa in future posts. They provide a simple way to identify and quantify
mental impurities, and how they are to be discarded step-by-step.
Next in the series, “Peace of Mind to Nibbāna – The Key Step“.
4.2.2 Peace of Mind to Nibbāna – The Key Step
I have changed the title of this post from “Nirāmisa Sukha to Nibbāna Suva – The Key Step”.
One needs to experience a “peace of mind” or “cooling down” (Nirāmisa sukha) before starting on
the Noble Path to Nibbāna; the transition to the Sotāpanna stage happens when one comprehends the
anicca nature while experiencing nirāmisa sukha.
§ After that transition, nirāmisa sukha becomes permanent with the removal of the
pancanivarana. The full explanation will take more posts, but we start here.
§ Many people start meditating without understanding what to meditate on. One needs to learn
basics of pure Buddha Dhamma first. One can start with conventional meditation techniques
that are out there, but in order to grasp deeper Dhamma, one needs to seriously start staying
away from the ten defilements (dasa akusala) as much as possible.
1. In the previous post “Living Dhamma – Introduction“, we discussed the experience of X. Please
read it before reading this post.
§ X had experienced nirāmisa sukha by engaging in a regular anariya metta bhāvanā. Even
though it led to a relaxed and calm state of mind, X realized that at the same time the desire to
engage in some types of sensual pleasures (reading books or listening to music) went away.
§ Then X stopped meditating for two weeks and the ability of enjoy books or music came back.
However, the nirāmisa sukha also went away and X’s mind was again burdened and agitated.
§ Some people may not even have had experienced such a temporary “cooling down” or nirāmisa
sukha, so I thought of discussing this a bit more before discussing the technical term “kilesa“. It
is important to figure out one’s current status before trying to get to the next stage. It is a step-
by-step process.
§ One needs to get to that stage (where X was) to at least to experience difference between the
nirāmisa sukha and sense pleasures in order to start comprehending anicca nature. It is at that
stage that pancanivarana are temporarily lifted and the mind becomes calm enough to
comprehend anicca nature. However, that can happen momentarily during listening to a
discourse too.
2. When one is fully immersed in sense pleasures, the mental burden that inevitably comes with it is
not apparent to that person. We have gotten used to the “mental agitation in the background” and
don’t feel it most of the time. Only when one somehow gets into a “calmed state of mind” by some
way, that one can begin to appreciate the burden of this “constant agitation or incessant distress” that
is in the background.
§ Through the mediation program, X has begun to appreciate the relief from this “incessant
distress” effect due to pancanivarana, and the relief is called nirāmisa sukha.
§ However, the conundrum is that there is a price to pay (if one does not comprehend the anicca
nature)! To the dismay of X, the ability to enjoy some favorite sense pleasures went away.
3. In very simple terms, this problem arises because X has not comprehended the anicca nature (what
we will be doing in this new section is to discuss a step-by-step process that could help comprehend
the anicca nature).
§ In X’s mind, those sense pleasures are worth hanging on to. And that feeling is VERY
POWERFUL. Even though I have lost the craving for SOME sense pleasures, I still have more
left. So, I know how hard it is to get rid of that “nagging feeling” of needing to go back to old
ways.
§ The only difference is that those desires that I lost are not coming back. There is no “nagging
feeling” or an urge of needing to go back to those “lost cravings”.
4. This is why comprehending the anicca nature nature is so important at X’s stage. When one
comprehends the anicca nature to SOME EXTENT, one loses the “nagging feeling” to go back to
SOME OF THE sense pleasures.
§ Only when one truly realizes the dangers (or at least the worthlessness) of a given sense
pleasure, that one automatically gave up that sense pleasure. For example, if one likes to go
hunting, one will not give it up voluntarily until one starts seeing the bad consequences of that
activity. Same for fishing, being an alcoholic or a drug user, etc.
§ Comprehension of the anicca nature comes gradually. One first sees the dangers in immoral
sense pleasures. Then one sees the worthlessness in extreme sense pleasures that are not
harmful to others, but to oneself. One sees the worthlessness of any sense pleasure in the
kāma loka only at the Anāgāmī stage. This why it is a step-by-step process.
5. It is like holding onto a gold necklace that was thought to be very valuable. But if it was proven
without any doubt that the necklace was an imitation, then one would lose the attachment to it
INSTANTLY.
§ Attaining the Sotāpanna stage via comprehending the anicca nature to some extent is like that,
i.e., realizing the dangers (and/or worthlessness) of SOME extreme sense pleasures. Even
though one may not realize that one has lost the craving for SOME sense attractions, one will
realize that within weeks or months.
§ Then, the more one meditates on the anicca nature, the more one starts seeing the perils of
other (less harmful) sense pleasures too. That is why one HAS TO proceed step-by-step.
Getting rid of ALL kāma rāga (attachment to sense inputs via the body touches, smells, and
tastes) happens only at the Anāgāmī stage.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 319
6. However, I must say that X is a bit unusual in the sense of losing the desire to read books and
listen to music. Those are not really “extreme sense pleasures”. Before that one will lose the desire to
go fishing, mistreating animals, etc. and also getting a pleasure from lying, gossiping, slandering,
stealing, sexual misconduct, etc. I am quite sure X never had a tendency for those anyway.
§ I also do not want people to get the idea that one needs to lose sense pleasures such as reading
books or listening to music in order to become a Sotāpanna, or to experience nirāmisa sukha.
That is not the case. One could even be a Sotāpanna and still have those two tendencies. I have
mentioned a person in the time of the Buddha who became a Sotāpanna but could not get rid of
the urge to have a drink (however, he did not live that long after attaining the Sotāpanna stage).
This is why no one can say whether another person has attained the Sotāpanna stage.
§ A Sotāpanna absolutely would not do only those deeds that could make him/her suitable for
rebirth in the apāyas. That means, he/she has removed high levels of greed, hate, and ignorance
to the levels of kāma rāga, paṭigha, and avijjā; see, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha,
Avijjā“.
§ My belief is that X had cultivated anariya jhānas in previous but recent rebirths, and is carrying
that “gathi” to this life. X has described some bodily sensations that are associated with jhānas.
This is why it is easy for X to at least temporarily lose attachment to even fairly harmless things
like reading books or listening to music.
7. Each person loses a set of individual characteristics (gathi) upon attaining the Sotāpanna stage.
One should be able to look back and see what those are, just like X did. And, of course, whether those
changes are permanent.
§ As I mentioned I have lost the urge to have a drink at the end of the day, which I had been
doing for over 30 years. I did not force that, even though I contemplated the bad possible
consequences of keeping that habit.
§ When one follows the Path, one does not forcefully give up sense pleasures, only immoral
actions that can hurt other living beings; even X did not forcefully give up books or music, it
just happened. Losing the desire for sense pleasures happens gradually, starting with extremes.
§ I have only lost interest in reading fiction books. I used to read all types of books, but now I am
not interested in reading fiction, because to me it is a waste of time just like watching TV. On
the other hand, I am now reading more non-fiction books.
§ I have also been more productive in my science interests over the past two years too. I have
learned the subtleties of quantum mechanics that were not apparent to me even two years ago.
Mind becomes much more clear as one gets rid of kilesa.
§ So, it is important to realize that one is not supposed to lose all interests. One loses interest in
only those activities related to greed, hate, and ignorance. That is a must, and that should be
fairly obvious when one looks back. One loses interest in all worldly affairs only upon attaining
the Arahanthood.
8. My point is that it is desirable for one to first get into this stage of X, where X can see the
difference between sensual pleasures (amisa sukha) and the nirāmisa sukha that arise by at least
temporarily suppressing the desire for sensual pleasures via a meditation program.
§ Even more critical than a meditation program is living a moral life, staying away from dasa
akusala as much as possible.
9. Many people try to attain “Nibbānic pleasure” just because they tend to think in terms of sensual
pleasures, i.e., that Nibbānic pleasure is like the pleasure of music, good food, etc. This is why the
account of X is so a good an example in pointing out the difference between the two.
§ Actually, this is good place to discuss the differences in amisa, nirāmisa, and jhāna sukha and
the Nibbānic suva.
§ I reserved the name “suva” for Nibbāna because it is even different from the nirāmisa sukha. It
is an overall state of “well-being”. I have no idea what that is like at higher stages, but right
now it is an ever-present calming effect on the body and mind.
§ Sense pleasures lead to āmisa (or sāmisa) sukha. So, we are all familiar with amisa sukha.
10. Nirāmisa sukha can arise due to a few different causes. They are all beneficial for the Path and to
comprehend the anicca nature.
§ Those citta that bring us amisa sukha are burdened with kilesa or akusala cetasika (which we
will discuss in the next post). These give rise to an agitated mind that is under incessant
distress; see, “The Incessant Distress (“Pilana”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca“. This is what X
described in the previous post as, “.. I stopped my formal meditation for a few weeks and I
found that I began to get agitated and anxious as before“. When one gets rid of this incessant
distress, one feels the nirāmisa sukha.
§ One can also feel the nirāmisa sukha for short times when engaged in moral activities, for
example, helping others or giving food to hungry people or animals. Again, this feeling comes
because those kilesa are not present in citta (thoughts) that arise during such activities.
§ Another is engaging in Ariya or anariya meditations. Here also one’s mind is mostly devoid of
kilesa (depending on the strength of the samādhi).
11. There is also a higher nirāmisa sukha that was recommended by the Buddha. That is the sukha
arising due to jhānas. When one is in a jhāna, one has citta running through one’s mind that belong
to rūpa or arūpa loka.
§ By definition, those citta are also devoid of kilesa or mental impurities.
§ Jhānas arise when samādhi is intensified (cultivated) to a certain level.
12. “Nivan suva” or “Nibbānic suva” or “Nibbānic bliss” is due to citta that are even more pure.
There is not a trace of incessant agitation or stress left in those citta.
§ These citta are also called pabhasvara (bright) citta; see, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to
Understand?“.
§ Also, Sotāpanna will not be able to experience the Nivana suva for that stage, unless he/she can
get into Sotāpanna phala samapatti via cultivating jhānas. Still, he/she will not have the
nirāmisa sukha going away. Whatever relief gained from the “incessant distress” is permanent.
13. We will discuss the kilesa (akusala cetasika) that give rise not only to incessant agitation and
stress — but eventually to all sansāric suffering — soon in this series.
§ The incessant distress can be considered as “immediate kamma vipāka” due to citta burdened
with kilesa or akusala cetasika. The “delayed effects” of such citta will bring more kamma
vipāka at later times, and the more potent ones can bring rebirth in the apāyas.
§ Thus the key step to the Sotāpanna stage is in experiencing nirāmisa sukha by cleansing the
mind via moral behavior (sīla) and a good meditation program. Then the mind is open to
grasping the anicca nature, i.e., pancanivara could be suppressed for days.
§ However, when one is living a moral life and is engaged in contemplating pure Dhamma, that
transition may happen quickly and may be even followed by the Sotāpanna phala moment even
without one noticing it at that time. Different people get there in different ways.
§ But there is much to discuss before discussing the Sotāpanna stage.
Next in the series, “Starting on the Path Even without Belief in Rebirth“, …..
4.2.3 Starting on the Path Even without Belief in Rebirth
1. After publishing two posts in a subsection entitled “New Approach to Meditation”, I started
realizing more aspects of the importance of this approach. So, I have started a whole new section,
“Living Dhamma” which lays out a step-by-step Path from fundamentals. Please read the first two
posts there before reading this post.
§ There are many people, including some Buddhists, who have a difficulty in connecting with the
idea of rebirth.
§ Rather than making the idea of rebirth as a prerequisite to start the practice, one can start
practicing by comprehending another type of suffering that the Buddha revealed to the world.
2. The Buddha revealed at least two types of suffering that are unknown to the world (and taught how
to get rid of both PERMANENTLY).
§ Even though the future suffering associated with the rebirth process is the one that is mostly
highlighted in literature, there is a suffering that we all experience in this life, without even
knowing about it.
§ That first type of suffering that we all experience is the incessant distress that we all feel (but
may not be even aware of). One starts feeling the nirāmisa sukha, when one temporarily
suppresses this incessant distress.
§ In a way, it is necessary to first to realize the existence of this first type of suffering, at least
suppress it, and experience the nirāmisa sukha that results from it (like X did).
§ That will provide the initial faith in Buddha Dhamma, and also enable the mind to get to
samādhi, and help comprehend the anicca nature. That will lead to the next step of
comprehending the second type of suffering associated with the rebirth process.
3. Rather than writing a few more posts on this, I decided to present this idea in the audio format. I
have never delivered a “desanā” previously, but hopefully you will be able to grasp the concept. You
need to adjust volume control on your computer:
“The Hidden Suffering that We All Can Understand“
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 1 - The Hidden Suffering That We All Can Understand
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 1 - The Hidden Suffering That We All Can Understand
(Original - Larger file size)
4. Here are the links to the posts mentioned in the above desanā:
Posts on the fundamentals of meditation:
Satipaṭṭhāna Bhāvanā:
Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Structure
Step-by-Step Progression in the Path:
This new subsection is now the second subsection in the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ Initially, I had “Living Dhamma – Fundamentals” as the second subsection after the “Living
Dhamma – Overview” subsection.
§ Now I realize that it was to much of a jump, even for many who have had exposure to Buddha
Dhamma, but are not familiar with cetasika and other key Pāli words. So, in this new
subsection, I plan to close that gap.
Posts:
This is going to be a series of posts that looks at Buddha Dhamma from a “bottoms up” approach.
Today, Dhamma is hidden under a lot of incomprehensible Pāli words. I can see that many people
just use Pāli words without knowing their true meanings. If one has a good understanding of the
“basics” or the “framework”, it is easier to understand and remember the meanings of key Pāli words.
§ This will be in summary form, since it is not possible to describe even the outline in several
posts. One can find relevant posts by using the “Search” box at top right. Furthermore, one can
ask questions at the discussion forum (“Forum”) where opinions of others can be seen too. I
encourage any opposing to views, as long as one is providing evidence from the Tipiṭaka.
§ This website is based solely on the Tipiṭaka and only the three Commentaries included with it.
The reasons for that are discussed in the section “Historical Background“.
1. The majority of people in the world today belong to one of the following two camps:
§ The next life is going to be forever, in the heaven or hell.
§ This life is all one has. When one dies, it is over. No rebirth or hell or heaven.
2. The first theory has been handed down from generation to generation for many, and there are
obviously many “holes” in that theory. It seems illogical in many ways (it is one thing to create the
Earth, but to create billions of galaxies with billions of planets like Earth? And how did the Creator
come about?), but just think about this:
§ If a baby dies within a few months will it go to heaven or hell (it has not done anything good or
bad)?
§ Furthermore, how come some people are born wealthy and thus have a better chance to go to
heaven than one who is born poor and thus may be tempted to do immoral things to survive
(and thus go to hell)?
3. The second theory appears more logical to many “scientifically-oriented” people with a
“materialistic” view.
§ But even if just one of the rebirth stories is believable or proven to the satisfaction of someone,
then that person has to throw away that theory.
§ More importantly, there is no explanation available for how consciousness arises from inert
matter. Our bodies are made of the “same stuff” that a tree or a house is made of.
4. In contrast, Buddha Dhamma says that there will be future lives as along as there are causes for
future lives to arise.
§ We can learn a lot about Buddha Dhamma by looking at what those causes are. Those causes
arise in one’s mind.
§ One’s Creator is oneself. And, as long as one perceives that ultimate happiness can be found in
this world, one will be reborn in this world.
1. In simple terms, Buddha Dhamma is based on the following four truths about this world, called the
Four Noble Truths:
§ The Noble Truth about suffering.
§ The causes for such suffering.
§ Those causes can be eliminated and thus it is possible to stop future suffering from arising.
§ The way to eliminate those causes and to attain ultimate happiness (Nibbāna).
2. The Buddha said that when one understands the First Truth, one will automatically understand the
other three as well. Therefore, let us discuss the First Noble Truth.
§ The key and critical issue here is to understand what is meant by “suffering” in Buddha
Dhamma.
§ It is important to realize that “suffering” and “the Truth about suffering” are two different
things.
3. Suffering as a feeling everyone knows very well. One does not have to be a Noble Person or even
a Buddhist to know what suffering is. Actually, even animals know what suffering is, and they don’t
like that either. We all have seen dogs cry with pain when hit.
§ So, what is the Noble Truth about suffering? The Buddha said that this Truth is unknown
and is hidden from the humans until a Buddha teaches what it is.
4. Understanding the truth about suffering requires an understanding of the wider world of 31 realms,
and that most of that future suffering would be in the four realms or the apāyas (of which animal
realm is one). But suffering is associated with all realms.
§ There are causes for that suffering, i.e., causes for leading to rebirth in the apāyas or in any
realm in general. The worst suffering can be stopped from arising by eliminating the causes for
births in the apāyas, and that is where one should first focus on.
§ There is a Noble Eightfold Path that one can follow to achieve that goal (a procedure to remove
those causes). So, now we can beginning to see why one will know all four Truths, when one
understands the First Truth.
1. We know that we are conscious because we can think. We think via thoughts. We can think about
many types of things.
§ When we are very sleepy, we are just aware that we are alive.
§ On the other hand, if one is about to be run over by a car, one will generate enough power to
jump a long distance away from that car or, if being chased by a lion, can probably beat a world
record for sprinting.
2. One’s actions and speech are also controlled by one’s mind via thoughts or citta that arise in the
mind.
§ We cannot even lift a finger without a citta or a thought arising in the mind. We may not even
think about lifting that finger, but we do. It is easy to figure out this way: We can fold that
finger any time we want to.
§ You may not realize that speech comes via thinking or citta. Again, it is easy to see that we can
stop that speech any time we want to.
3. One’s actions, speech, and thoughts have consequences. In fact, one’s conscious thoughts
determine the level of future suffering.
§ Future suffering arises due to our conscious thoughts or citta, and they are also called
saṅkhāra in some contexts.
4. There is a difference between citta and saṅkhāra (the English word “thought” does not translate
exactly as either).
§ Normally, the word citta is used in Abhidhamma to denote the smallest mental activity that lasts
only a fraction of a billionth of a second.
§ The word saṅkhāra is used to represent the overall effect of billions of citta.
§ In that sense the word thought is more closer to saṅkhāra.
5. Those thoughts that are used to move the body (lifting that finger) are called kāya saṅkhāra,
because those saṅkhāra control the body or kaya.
§ Those that lead to speech are called vacī saṅkhāra, which are two types: We can speak out
loudly or just “talk to ourselves” (thinking consciously); both are vacī saṅkhāra.
§ However, the word “vācā” is used only for speaking out loud.
§ Other thoughts that arise are called mano saṅkhāra, which are those thoughts that arise without
us even thinking about it consciously.
§ So, I hope it is clear what those three types of saṅkhāra are. It is important to be able see the
differences. But they all arise in the mind.
6. Those mano saṅkhāra arise automatically even without us being aware of it until they arise. They
arise based on our gati (or character or habits).
§ Immediately after mano saṅkhāra arise, we become aware of them and if we are not paying
attention we may just keep generating vacī saṅkhāra along the same lines.
§ For example, when an alcoholic sees a bottle of alcohol at a party, his/her first reaction is to
have a drink. But if that person has will power, he/she can think about the bad consequences
and forcefully move the mind to some other matter.
§ Both Satipaṭṭhāna and Ānāpāna bhāvanā are based on understanding how vacī saṅkhāra arise
based on mano saṅkhāra that arise according to one’s gati (and that we have control over vacī
saṅkhāra).
7. Another important observation from the above discussion is that our physical bodies are “inert
shells”. It is controlled by a mental body (called “gandhabba“) where all thoughts (and thus
saṅkhāra) arise.
§ This is why in many confirmed Out of Body Experiences (OBE), the body becomes lifeless
when the gandhabba comes out of the body.
§ These are all key concepts that we have discussed in detail at the website. One can use the
“Search” box to find details as needed.
Not all thoughts are the same. In order to get a better idea about thoughts or saṅkhāra, it is good to
know some basic facts about citta.
1. Citta can be of 89 types and that analysis is very complex. We don’t need to know all those. We
justneed to know that some of those 89 types is called a “javana citta” and those are very
powerful citta.
§ The word “javana” comes from the root “ja” meaning “birth”. Thus javana citta are the root for
all births. Javana can also means “running”, or “spear” that can penetrate, to indicate the
power.
§ The opposite of javana citta would be “ati parittārammana citta” that we don’t really even feel.
Those citta arise when we are asleep and are responsible for breathing.
§ Breathing involves movement of body parts (lungs), and is thus a “kāya saṅkhāra”. This is an
excellent example of a saṅkhāra that is not defiled. It is an essential action to maintain life.
2. On the other side of the spectrum, we have powerful javana citta, which CAN lead to strong
saṅkhāra called abhisaṅkhāra.
§ J avana citta generate energies that is the root cause of future vipāka (results) that can give rise
to various types of vipāka during a lifetime. Strong ones can lead to future rebirths. Thus, the
key to future suffering is hidden in javana citta.
§ However, not all javana citta lead to abhisaṅkhāra. For example, kusala kamma (wholesome
deeds) done by Arahants are not called abhisaṅkhāra. They are called kriya. They don’t have
kammic energy to fuel rebirths or bring pavutti vipāka.
3. A very strong kāya saṅkhāra would be to kill a human, say by stabbing. That requires a very strong
impulse, a high javana power. One can do that only when one’s mind is very agitated and is full of
hate. These are called apuññabhi saṅkhāra (apuñña abhi saṅkhāra, meaning “bad strong saṅkhāra“).
§ However, high javana power does not necessarily mean a bad action. When someone does
good deeds (kusala kamma), they are done with puññabhi saṅkhāra (puñña abhi saṅkhāra,
meaning “good strong saṅkhāra“).
§ High javana power may involve neutral actions too. For example, lifting a heavy object
requires high javana power. But if that is done while cleaning house, for example, that is a
neutral action (no kammically good or bad intention), therefore is not called good or bad (puñña
or apuñña). Such javana citta are not included in Abhidhamma because they do not have
kammic consequences.
4. There are 12 types of javana citta corresponding to the 12 types of akusala citta and 8 types of
javana citta corresponding to the 8 types of kusala citta.
§ These are the javana citta of importance to us.
§ The 12 types of akusala citta with akusala javana can bring bad vipāka during a lifetime or
rebirth in “bad realms”.
§ The 8 types of kusala citta with kusala javana can bring good vipāka during a lifetime or
rebirth in “good realms”. We need to do kusala kamma in order to avoid rebirth in the apāyas
and to attain Nibbāna.
§ However, “good” and “bad” in the above are relative. It is just that “bad realms” have
obviously harsh suffering. But no realm out of the possible 31 realms is free of suffering.
5. Now we are beginning to see why dasa akusala kamma or the ten immoral deeds (that are
done with those 12 types of akusala citta) are at the heart of Buddha Dhamma.
§ When one is engaged in such immoral deeds, they generate “energies” called “bhava shakti” to
fuel future kamma vipāka (bad results), including rebirths in the apāyas.
§ Thus it is unfruitful and dangerous to engage in dasa akusala; this is why such activities are of
anicca nature (do not lead to what one expects and only lead to more stress and suffering), one
of the three characteristics of this world (Tilakkhaṇa).
§ Obviously, such activities leads to suffering or dukkha, the second of the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Once one gets a rebirth in the apāyas, it is very hard to get out and thus one becomes
“helpless”. Furthermore, clearly such actions are fruitless in the long run even if born in “good
realms”. This is the key to understand “anatta“, the third characteristic of this world.
So, that is the first part of a highly-condensed outline of Buddha Dhamma. We will continue this
outline in the next post.
Ongoing discussion on this topic at the discussion forum: “Buddha Dhamma for an Inquiring Mind“.
4.3.2 Root of All Suffering – Ten Immoral Actions
1. This new subsection of “Dhamma with Less Pāli” is now the second subsection in the “Living
Dhamma” section.
§ In the first desanā of the “Living Dhamma – Overview” subsection, we talked about how one’s
mind get agitated when one is engaged in dasa akusala or the ten immoral actions.
2. After that “Living Dhamma – Overview” subsection, I had “Living Dhamma – Fundamentals” as
the next subsection, where I started discussing the connection between those dasa akusala and
cetasika or mental factors in our thoughts.
§ Now I realize that it was to much of a jump, even for many who have had exposure to Buddha
Dhamma but are not familiar with cetasika.
§ So, in this new subsection — “Dhamma with Less Pāli” — I plan to close that gap. This
subsection will have much less Pāli words, and I will try to introduce only the essential Pāli
words as I proceed.
3. Here is the first desanā: “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”. Here we discuss the ten
immoral actions (dasa akusala) and how avoiding them helps calm the mind; in fact, this is the key to
avoid depression.
WebLink: Download “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”
WebLink: Download “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)” (Original - Larger file size)
4. Posts relevant to the desanā:
Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)
How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma
Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra
Truine Brain: How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits
The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)
Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi)
How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific View
Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis
Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage
Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in Buddhism
§ In the first desanā of the “Living Dhamma – Overview” subsection, I talked about how one’s
mind get agitated when one is engaged in dasa akusala or the ten immoral actions. Here is that
desanā:
“The Hidden Suffering that We All Can Understand“
WebLink: Download “The Hidden Suffering that We All Can Understand”
I recommend reading the three posts in that “Living Dhamma – Overview” subsection.
4.3.3 Is Suffering the Same as the First Noble Truth on Suffering?
The main goal of meditation before the Sotāpanna stage is to understand the message of the Buddha.
Before following the Path, one needs to comprehend what it is about. It is better to get into
satipattāna bhāvanā after one fully understands what is going to be done in satipattāna bhāvanā.
Many people waste a lot of time doing what they perceive to be satipattāna bhāvanā, and do not get
much benefit.
I will have several posts here that one could use for contemplation in meditation. When the mind
calms down some, one should think about validity of what is discussed; understanding itself lead to
getting rid of defilements. One can even reach the Sotāpanna stage just via “dassanena pahatabba”
or “removal via clear vision”.
1. Many people have misconceptions about the First Noble Truth on Suffering or Dukkha Sacca
(pronounced “sachchā). In one of the internet forums, I was asked two questions that embody many
of such misconceptions about Buddha’s message.
§ “I understand what the Buddha meant by suffering because I came down with this ailment.
How do other people understand Buddha’s message and how do they find out about his
message?”
§ Then there was this question from apparently by a young person, “With so many pleasurable
things around us with the innovations from science and technology, why do people need to
think about suffering? Isn’t Buddha’s message kind of outdated?”
2. Before discussing them, it is clear that they both have good and bad implications.
§ People at least search the internet and find out about Buddha Dhamma because of the first, and
those who are “enjoying life to the fullest” may not even hear about Buddha Dhamma at all
because of the second.
§ On the other hand, the assertion is wrong in the first question, and is correct in the second at
least on the surface.
3. The Buddha never said that “there are no sense pleasures to be had in this world”. On the
contrary, he said people are unable to SEE the hidden suffering BECAUSE of the apparent sense
pleasures they are enjoying OR those that are within reach even if not available to one right away.
§ Even a poor person can see all the sense-fulfilling offers all around; even if he cannot access
them at the moment, his thinking is “if I work hard, I can access all these pleasures at some
point”. Thus whether rich or poor, all are “under the illusion of a sea of apparent pleasures” to
be had.
4. Buddha Dhamma needs to be understood with wisdom. Wisdom (paññā) is a mental factor
(cetasika) that needs to be cultivated mostly by reading (or listening) about the Buddha’s world view
first.
§ Most people just PERCEIVE suffering through the mental factor (cetasika) of feeling (vedanā),
like the person who asked the first question above. One can experience suffering, but that is
NOT the Noble Truth ON suffering.
§ The second questioner had not EXPERIENCED much of suffering, and does not think he needs
to pay any attention.
§ Both need to look at world with wisdom within the worldview of the Buddha to see the
HIDDEN suffering. This CANNOT be done without understanding what the Buddha was
saying about a more expansive and more complex world than what we experience with our six
senses (of course one will not BELIEVE it unless one is convinced; the real conviction will
come only if one gets familiar with the whole message).
5. In his first sermon, Dhamma Cakka Pavatta Sutta, the Buddha said this about his new message to
the world: “pubbe ananussutesu dhammesu” or “a Dhamma that has never been known to the world”.
6. Everyone can and will experience suffering during this life; there in nothing NEW in that.
What is new in the message of the Buddha can be briefly stated as:
§ There is a wider world out there with many more beings living in 29 more realms than the
human and animal realms that we experience, AND the real suffering is in the lower four
realms.
§ This life is only a brief stop in our long journey through the cycle of rebirths called saṃsāra.
§ Even in this life, there is hidden suffering even when one seems to be enjoying life, AND there
is real suffering at old age and death that is inevitable for everyone. This last part of course is
apparent to anyone, but is not thought about much at all. As one gets old, when the real
suffering starts the mind could be too weak to learn Dhamma.
§ MOST IMPORTANT part of the Buddha’s message is the one that is least heard about; That
there is permanent happiness to be had, and that CAN be attained during this very life.
7. I have several posts on the “bigger worldview of the Buddha” and also on rebirth, nature of
kamma, etc. Also, there are several posts on the nirāmisa sukha which is a happiness of permanent
nature to be had during this very life by following the Path advised by the Buddha.
§ Let us take a brief look at the third point on the ‘hidden suffering” with a couple of examples
next.
8. Example 1: When a fish bites the bait, it does not see the suffering hidden in that action. Looking
from the ground we can see the whole picture and we know what is going to happen to the fish if it
bites the bait. But the fish is unable to see that whole picture, and thus does not see the hidden
suffering. It only sees a delicious bit of food.
§ In the same way, if we do not know about the wider world of 31 realms (with the suffering-
laden four lowest realms), and that we have gone through unimaginable suffering in those
realms in the past, we only focus on what is easily accessible to our six senses.
9. Example 2: Suppose someone makes you an offer. He says, “I will put you in one of the best
resorts with all amenities paid for a month. But there is a catch. The food will taste great but will
have traces of poison that will become effective in a few months and will lead to death within the
year”.
Will anyone take the offer, knowing that it will lead to suffering and death? Of course not.
§ But if the host did not tell them, they would not know, and will have a good time, but will have
the same consequences.
§ In the same way, we are enjoying the sense pleasures without knowing the consequences of
them, especially if we did immoral things to get those pleasures.
10. Here is another thing to contemplate: We all have seen how a parent, a grandparent, or even an
unrelated celebrity from past years transforms from a dynamic, self-confident, and sometimes
imposing character to a feeble, helpless person in the latter years. Sometimes they die under pathetic
conditions that would have been unimaginable for them when they were young. But this change is
gradual, and even they do not realize it until it is too late.
§ When one becomes too old, it may be too late to start thinking about these facts; one needs to
spend even a little time contemplating on these “facts of life” now. Not to get depressed about
this inevitability, but to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT; this will enable one to enjoy the latter
days of life with nirāmisa sukha, even if no stage of Nibbāna is attained.
11. Now, this DOES NOT MEAN one should get away from all sense pleasures even if one becomes
convinced of the core message of the Buddha. Abandoning everything may have even worse
consequences if it is not done with true understanding. And it takes time to digest the whole message.
It has taken me several years to come to the stage where I am now. I have not given up anything with
remorse; I do not “miss” anything that I have given up. The only things one may want to “forcefully
give up” are things that directly hurt other beings like killing, stealing, etc which most people don’t
do anyway.
§ Giving up sense pleasures comes gradually with understanding, when one sees the benefits of
giving up.
§ There is no need to rush into taking drastic actions. The urgent task is to GET STARTED.
Allocate a little time each each day to learn Dhamma, preferably when the mind is a bit calmer
so that one can focus and contemplate. As the Buddha said, this Dhamma is really different
from what we are used to.
12. As one begins to understand the message of the Buddha, the learning process will become easier.
What I hope to do with this site is to basically present all the background material that I have gone
through, so others do not have to repeat it all. Of course you may want to do additional research; each
one may be looking at things a bit differently. I will be happy to address any issues that are not
discussed on the site yet.
13. In summary, the First Noble Truth on suffering is NOT to be EXPERIENCED as a feeling
(vedanā), but needs to be UNDERSTOOD with wisdom (paññā). Actually, when one is experiencing
any form of suffering that makes it HARDER to grasp the meaning of the First Noble Truth. One
needs a clear, calm, and healthy mind to grasp it.
A not-so-deep analysis of Dukkha Sacca is given in the post, “Does the First Noble Truth Describe
only Suffering?“
A deeper analysis of the Dukkha Sacca is given in the next post, The Incessant Distress (“Pilana”) –
Key to Dukkha Sacca.
4.3.4 Dhamma, Saṅkhāra, Sankata, Rūpa, Viññāṇa, Gati, Āsava, Anusaya
July 22, 2018
1. I recently realized that it would be a good idea to explain what is meant by key Pāli words like the
above in one place.
§ This information could be there spread over hundreds of posts at the website, but not many
people have read even a fraction of what is at the web site.
§ Since it is critical to understand these key terms, I will try to provide another condensed “big
picture” in terms of these key words. In the last post we analyzed the big picture in terms of
root causes; see, “Six Root Causes – Loka Samudaya (Arising of Suffering) and Loka
Nirodhaya (Nibbāna)“.
2. One way to look at this is to start with how the Buddha described “everything in this world”. We
have two worlds to begin with: physical world (bhautika loka) and the mind world (mano loka).
§ Everything that is in the physical world is detected by the five physical senses of eyes, ears,
nose, tongue, and the body: vanna rūpa (visible objects), sadda rūpa (sounds), gandha rūpa
(smells), rasa rūpa (tastes), and pottabba rūpa (touchable objects).
§ Therefore, everything that is in our physical world are called rūpa, and are included in the
five types mentioned above. Those rūpa are all above the suddhāshtaka stage.
§ For example, we can see vanna rūpa with eyes: “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“. Similarly for other four.
§ Some objects in the physical world can be detected with more than one sense faculty, and the
more information we get the more knowledgeable we become of the object: we can see and
touch an apple; if we can also smell it, the apple is probably ripe; if we taste it, we can confirm
that it is ripe.
3. We have a sixth sense faculty: mana indriya, which basically detects everything else in our
world, and they are called dhammā: “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ”.
These dhammā are in our mano loka (mental world).
§ These dhammā include everything that is not detected with the five physical senses. They
include, for example, kamma beeja, nāma gotta (memory records or memories), mathematics,
philosophy, Buddha Dhamma, etc.
§ Those are also called rūpa, but those rūpa are different from the rūpa in the physical world:
Some have energies that lie below the suddhashtaka stage (kamma beeja), and the rest of them
are either just memories (nāma gotta) or concepts.
§ These fine rūpa are described as, “anidassanan, appatighan, dhammāyatana pariyāpanna
rūpam” or “rūpa that cannot be seen, touched, and only detected via dhammāyatana (mana
indriya)”.
4. When one of our senses detects something in our physical world or the mental world, one of
the six types of viññāṇa arise, and we become aware of that “thing”, whether it is a vanna rūpa,
sadda rūpa, or a dhammā.
§ Viññāṇa is a very complex entity: it includes or encompasses the following: our feelings
(vedanā), perceptions (saññā), and a set individual mental factors (cetasika). They all arise
together, and the set of cetasika that arise is dependent on each person’s gati.
§ For example, totally different sets of vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra (i.e., cetasika) arise when a
famous politician is seen by one of his supporters and a person from the opposition party.
§ But in addition, viññāṇa also includes one’s hopes for the future. That is important.
5. The initial response in one’s mind upon subjected to an external sense input (whether it is seeing,
hearing or just a memory coming to the mind), is called a mano saṅkhāra. Of course that is part of
viññāṇa.
§ Now, we can see why different people generate different types of viññāṇa when exposed to the
same sense input. Those mano saṅkhāra — that is generated instantaneously — depends on
one’s gati or set of kilesa (lobha, dosa, moha).
§ Each person has a set of kilesa called āsava, and one’s gati (and therefore those mano
saṅkhāra) closely follow those āsava; we will discuss that below.
6. If that sense input is an interesting one (a like or a dislike), then immediately one starts thinking
about it. This is called “generating vacī saṅkhāra” or basically “talking to oneself”. Now one is fully
aware that one is thinking about that sense input, whether it is a picture, sound, a memory, or
anything else.
§ Furthermore, if one gets really animated about that object, one may speak about (still with vacī
saṅkhāra), and may even take a bodily action which will involve kāya saṅkhāra.
§ In contrast to mano saṅkhāra that arise AUTOMATICALLY, both vacī and kāya saṅkhāra are
generated consciously. This is key to Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna meditation, since we have the
ability to stop or to continue with those vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Those three types are collectively called saṅkhāra.
§ So, I hope you now have a better understanding of what is meant by viññāṇa and saṅkhāra and
also how they are related. From #4 above, we can also see that saṅkhāra are part of dhammā.
7. By the way, kāya kamma are those actions done with the body, but we see that kāya saṅkhāra are
responsible for such kāya kamma.
§ In the same way, vacī saṅkhāra are responsible for vacī kamma, and mano saṅkhāra are
responsible for mano kamma.
§ All kamma (actions) are done with saṅkhāra. They all have origins in the mind.
8. Now, these saṅkhāra can be “harmless” or “dangerous” or “beneficial”. Our actions, speech, and
thoughts are all based on these saṅkhāra.
§ When one gets hungry, one may generate vacī and kāya saṅkhāra to ask for food or to go walk
to the kitchen and get something to eat. Such saṅkhāra are kammically neutral, in the sense that
they don’t lead to “good or bad kamma vipāka” in the future other than getting what one
wanted to satisfy the hunger.
§ Of course, if one gets attached to that food while eating, one may generate strong saṅkhāra or
abhisaṅkhāra that will have significant kammic consequences. That is an apuñña abhisaṅkhāra
since that involves the lobha cetasika.
9. If one is planning to kill another human, then one would be generating very strong “apuñña
abhisaṅkhāra” that involves vacī saṅkhāra and may lead to kāya saṅkhāra if one actually goes
through the killing. Then one would have generated a strong kamma beeja that can bring a future
birth in the apāyās.
§ On the other hand, if one is studying Buddha Dhamma, one will be generating all three types of
puñña abhisaṅkhāra (thinking, contemplating and doing things like downloading material from
the internet). They will create good kamma beeja that will lead to good vipāka: either leading to
magga phala or at least births in good realms so that one could continue on the Path.
10. Now we can begin to see how saṅkhāra can lead to formation (or arising) of saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala). A potent kamma beeja generated via a strong apuñña abhisaṅkhāra can lead to say,
animal bhava, and to the birth as an animal.
§ Therefore, that saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (animal) came to being because of that kamma
beeja, and many abhisaṅkhāra could have contributed to that kamma beeja.
§ In the same way, a strong “good kamma beeja” generated via puñña abhisaṅkhāra (puñña
kamma) can lead to a human or a deva birth. That human or deva is a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) too.
11. It is much more complex, but ALL material things arise in this world are due to saṅkhāra. I will
take a simple example to show the basic idea.
§ A house (a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) comes into being as a result of many types of
saṅkhāra. First, one needs to get the idea to build a house. Then he/she may consult an architect
and after much discussion (lot of mano and vacī saṅkhāra and also kāya saṅkhāra), they will
come up with a blueprint (plan) for the house.
§ Then many people will work to build the house. Innumerable mano, vacī, kāya saṅkhāra are
involved in bringing the house to completion (of course, most of those are not puñña or apuñña
abhisaṅkhāra; they are just mostly neutral saṅkhāra).
§ The explanation of how a tree arises is a more complex one, but also has origins in the mind.
We may get to that at a future time, but it is not necessary to attain Nibbāna. As the Buddha
said: “mind is the precursor to everything in this world”.
12. Any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) has the following universal properties: it comes into being
and eventually is destroyed, and also it undergoes unexpected change while in existence. Think about
anything in this world. Those three characteristics are associated with any of them.
§ This is why ANY saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) HAS the anicca nature. It is said that
“uppāda vayattena aniccā“, emphasizing those main properties: any saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) arises and eventually is subjected to decay and death, whether it is living or inert.
13. However, it is important to realize that a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) WILL NOT bring
suffering to anyone, unless one gets attached to it. A saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) has the anicca
nature (i.e., the potential to bring suffering), but it does not automatically lead to suffering.
§ A bottle of poison sitting on a table has the potential to kill someone. But unless someone takes
the bottle and drinks from it, he/she will not be affected.
§ In the same way, we will be subjected to suffering ONLY IF we get attached to worldly things
(saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), whether it is a person, house, car, etc). Then why do we get
attached to such things all the time? That is because we have not comprehended the real anicca
nature of saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). It is not easy to see the anicca nature.
14. Therefore, a key point is that any type of rūpa (or any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) in general)
WILL NOT bring us dukkha unless we get attached to (or repulsed by it), i.e., it leads to taṇhā in the
mind.
§ This is why the Buddha said, ‘”..panca upādānakkhandhā dukkhā“, and NOT “pañcakkhandha
dukkhā“.
§ There could be all kinds of attractive/hateful things around us, but if we don’t generate upādāna
for them via craving (lobha) or hate (dosa), we will not be subjected to suffering.
§ However, that is hard to do until one cultivates paññā (wisdom) by learning Buddha Dhamma
and eventually grasping the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta).
15. Until then, when we experience a sense input via any of the six senses (see above), we may
automatically generate bad mano saṅkhāra and then willingly generate vacī and kāya saṅkhāra along
the same lines, if we are not being mindful.
§ As we discussed above, those mano saṅkhāra arise AUTOMATICALLY according to our gati.
Those gati are closely associated with āsava (mental fermentations) that cannot be removed
until one comprehends Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Based on the sense input, those āsava may come to the surface and that is called anusaya; see,
“Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava“.
§ The only way to change those gati (i.e., to remove āsava from one’s mind permanently) is to
cultivate Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna, by being mindful of what kind of saṅkhāra arise in our
minds as we are exposed to such external sense inputs.
§ So, it is VERY IMPORTANT to both learn Buddha Dhamma (in particular Tilakkhaṇa) and
ALSO to practice real Ānāpāna/Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā.
16. It must be clear now that the main cause of suffering is not saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala),
but saṅkhāra, specifically apuñña abhisaṅkhāra. This is why it is said that “sabbe saṅkhāra
aniccā” and NOT “sabbe saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) aniccā” or “sabbe dhamma aniccā“
§ Another word for apuñña abhisaṅkhāra is dasa akusala. Abstaining from dasa akusala is the
same as stopping BAD mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Some of that can be done via pure determination. However, that discipline becomes hard when
one gets strong sense inputs. For example, one may not take a bribe, but if the offer is a million
dollars one may be tempted to take the bribe.
17. That is the difference a real comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa will accomplish; one’s tendency to do
immoral things will naturally reduce as one’s comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa increases. An Arahant
will not be tempted by absolutely anything.
§ An Anāgāmī will not be tempted by any “kāma” input: most attractive person or even the most
vile person. But he/she will have a liking (craving) for Buddha Dhamma and possibly for jhānic
pleasures.
§ A Sotāpanna WILL NOT do any apāyagāmi akusala (i.e., will not generate such apuñña
abhisaṅkhāra).
§ Those controls take place automatically. The mind will automatically do that by not generating
even spontaneous mano saṅkhāra belonging to those categories. That is done via
permanently changing one’s gati for the better via paññā.
18. Finally, another thing to remember is that most of what we experience are dhammā, via the mana
indriya.
§ Those five physical senses are active ONLY in bringing that sense input, which means that
sense experience is very brief.
§ Let us take an example of watching a person walking towards you. When the person is 100
meters away, you see a snapshot of him. Then that mental imprint immediately goes to the past.
By the time he is close to you, all those visual events of him walking towards you will have
been gone to the past; they can now be recalled only as dhammā.
§ Same is true for all five physical senses. We experience them only DURING the sense event,
only momentarily. After that we can only RECALL those events with the mana indriya. Those
past sense events come back to as nāma gotta or memories. A day after meeting that person,
you can visualize the whole event with the mana indriya.
19. Therefore, pacakkhandha (except for those arising at any given moment) are really dhammā, that
are experienced by the mind via the mana indriya. This is a subtle point that may not be obvious
immediately; also, see “Panñakkhandha or Five Aggregates – A Misinterpreted Concept“.
§ We get attached to only a small fraction of pañcakkhandha, and that is called panca
upādānakkhandha; see, “Pancupādānakkhandha – It is All Mental“.
20. If you think deep enough you will realize the world that one experiences is made up by one’s
mind to some extent (it is easy to see that our vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa are all highly
personal, and are based on one’s gati.
§ The physical world around us exists for sure and is real, but what we perceive is highly
personal. What we really see and experience is our own “mental picture” of the world: our own
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa.
21. This post became longer than I expected. However, it is not possible to even provide a basic
outline in a short post. Still one would need to read other relevant posts to really understand this basic
layout, and thereby understand those key words better. But it is important to do, if one is really
interested in grasping the true teachings of the Buddha.
§As the Buddha said, “this Dhamma has never been known to the world, and it is not easy to
comprehend”. It requires a real effort. On the other hand, getting released from the apāyās
should not be expected to be done easily. Otherwise, none of us would still be here.
Any questions can be discussed at the discussion forum at: “Difference Between Dhammā and
Saṅkhāra“.
4.3.5 Complexity of the Mind – Viññāṇa and Saṅkhāra
1. Even though science has made great progress in the understanding of the material world, science
has achieved very little progress regarding mind phenomena.
§ In fact, the words viññāṇa and saṅkhāra have no corresponding words in English. It is absurd
to translate viññāṇa as “consciousness”.
§ I looked up the definition of consciousness. Normally it is defined as, “the state of being awake
and aware of one’s surroundings” or “the awareness or perception of something by a person”.
That is definitely not what is meant by viññāṇa.
2. Viññāṇa arises only when one acts with avijjā: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and “saṅkhāra
paccayā viññāṇa“. Thus, viññāṇa can arise only if one acts with avijjā or ignorance.
§ The Buddha did not act with viññāṇa (i.e., did not generate kamma viññāṇa) after attaining the
Buddhahood. But he had perfectly good consciousness.
§ Viññāṇa is a very complex word. Even though I have simplified viññāṇa as “defiled
consciousness”, that is also not adequate; see, “Viññāṇa – Consciousness Together With Future
Expectations“.
3. In WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga, the term “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” in
akusala-mūla Paticca Samuppāda (that leads to suffering) is explained as follows: “Tattha katame
avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā? Puññābhisaṅkhāro, apuññābhisaṅkhāro, āneñjābhisaṅkhāro,
kāyasaṅkhāro, vacīsaṅkhāro, cittasaṅkhāro“.
Translated: “What is avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā? Puññābhisaṅkhāra, apuññābhisaṅkhāra,
āneñjābhisaṅkhāra, kāyasaṅkhāra, vacīsaṅkhāra, cittasaṅkhāra“. (here, cittasaṅkhāra is the same as
manosaṅkhāra).
§ It needs to be noted that these are all abhisaṅkhāra, even though the verse is simplified as
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā“.
§ There are two types of abhisaṅkhāra mentioned there: one kind refers to types of kamma
accrued. The other refers to whether they are done by the body, speech, or the mind.
§ Therefore, saṅkhāra has a much deeper meaning than just “mental formations”, even though
that is better than the translation for viññāṇa as consciousness.
§ Let us discuss those two types next.
3. First, let us consider mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ They all arise in the mind, but have differences: thoughts that arise automatically in the mind
are called mano saṅkhāra.
§ When we consciously think about something, those are vacī saṅkhāra (speaking out is also
included).
§ When we move the body with our thoughts, those thoughts are kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Of course, those saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra when they are done with immoral or moral
intentions and thus lead to rebirth and future suffering (see #5 below).
4. In other words, saṅkhāra in “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” in akusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda are
really abhisaṅkhāra that lead to rebirth.
§ Even an Arahant will generate saṅkhāra (all three types of mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, and
kāya saṅkhāra) in order to live in this world until the physical body dies.
§ However, an Arahant will NOT generate any type of abhisaṅkhāra.
5. Abhisaṅkhāra are again divided into three categories of apuñña abhisaṅkhāra, puñña
abhisaṅkhāra, and ānenja abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Apuñña abhisaṅkhāra are immoral actions leading to births in the apāyās.
§ Puñña abhisaṅkhāra are moral actions leading births in the good realms of human, deva, and
rūpāvacara brahma realms (via cultivation of rūpāvacara jhāna).
§ Ānenja abhisaṅkhāra are involved in cultivation of arūpāvacara jhāna leading to rebirth in
arūpāvacara brahma realms.
§ Therefore, just translating saṅkhāra as “mental formations” is not very useful in describing
what they really are; see, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
6. In order to understand the severity of this problem, let us examine a presentation by the
philosopher John Searle, “Our Shared Condition – Consciousness”.
WebLink: youtube: John Searle: Our shared condition -- consciousness
7. In my opinion, John Searle is one of few philosophers who comes even close to understanding
mind phenomena. Some philosophers/scientists do not even believe that consciousness is real. They
say: “..Science is objective, consciousness is subjective, therefore there cannot be a science of
consciousness”. Whether there can be a “science of consciousness” or not, consciousness is real, as
Searle points out.
§ Some others object, “..Maybe consciousness exists, but it can’t make any difference to the
world. How could spirituality move anything?”. In response, Searle points out: “..I decide
consciously to raise my arm, and the damn thing goes up”.
8. John Searle is also quite correct that consciousness is not an illusion. As he points out, only a
conscious living being can decide to move a body part, say raise a hand.
§ But to be perfectly correct, consciousness is not what moves an arm. One needs to make a
“conscious effort” to move the arm, i.e., one makes a determination to raise the hand. That is
what is called kāya saṅkhāra: conscious thoughts that lead to moving body parts.
§ However, it is important to realize that the energy to raise the hand does not come from the
mind. Mind just initiates the process and the brain sends the necessary commands to the
muscles to raise the hand; energy for such muscle movements comes from the food we eat.
§ Just like an on-board computer carries out the commands of the pilot flying a plane, the brain
acts like a computer and carries out the commands given by the mind.
9. Kāya saṅkhāra are defined as “assāsa passāsā kāya saṅkhāra” or “breathing in and out is done
with kāya saṅkhāra“. Such kāya saṅkhāra are done by us all through our lives, and that is the most
basic kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Even though we do not realize it, breathing in and out involves “thinking at the lowest level” or
with “atiparittārammana citta vīthi“. Those citta vīthi do not have javana citta and thus we do
not “feel them”.
§ Those kāya saṅkhāra involved in breathing stop when one gets into fourth jhāna samāpatti.
Then one is relieved of even the tiniest effort involved in breathing.
§ Kāya saṅkhāra are involved in any bodily movement. Unless those bodily movements lead to
kammic effects (good or bad), they do not become abhisaṅkhāra leading to rebirth.
10. Vacī saṅkhāra also can be just saṅkhāra (thinking/speaking about normal activities) or
abhisaṅkhāra with kammic consequences.
§ Both vacī and kāya abhisaṅkhāra can lead to rebirth.
§ Mano saṅkhāra — which arise automatically — do not lead to rebirths.
11. Modern science cannot explain saṅkhāra (more correctly how a person moves body parts or
speaks on his/her volition). English language does not have an equivalent word for “saṅkhāra“.
Furthermore, as explained above, “consciousness” should not be used as the English translation for
“viññāṇa“.
§ It is better to use those Pāli words (saṅkhāra and viññāṇa) and to learn what is meant by
them.
§ That is what has been the practice in Sinhala language. If you look at the Sinhala translation
of the Tipiṭaka, the words viññāṇa and saṅkhāra are used without providing Sinhala
translations for those two words. In fact, I do not believe that there are Sinhala words
assigned for viññāṇa and saṅkhāra.
4.3.6 Citta, Manō, Viññāṇa – Stages of a Thought
1. Citta, mano, viññāṇa are common words that have not been clarified in current texts on Buddhism
(Buddha Dhamma). They are all related, yet different.
§ This may come as a surprise to many, but a citta is “contaminated” in eight steps to become
viññāṇa (and in another step to become part of the viññākkhanda. and that is completed in an
unbelievably short time.
§ I hope this post will clarify some fundamental concepts and that will be invaluable in
understanding other concepts.
§ I cringe when I see some online comments even say viññāṇa is Nibbāna. It is exactly the
opposite: One attains Nibbāna when one gets rid of viññāṇa, or more precisely when one
purifies one’s mind to the extent that a thought does not contaminate to the viññāṇa stage.
§ Viññāṇa is discussed at “Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
2. The generic term in English thought cannot even begin to explain the complex process that
happens within a fraction of a billionth of a second when a citta arises, goes through three stages
(uppada, tithi, bhnaga; I am giving this Pāli terms so that those who know them can make the
connection), and is terminated.
§ When we see, hear, smell, taste, or touch, 17 such citta flow uninterrupted; that is called a
pañcadvāra citta vīthi (“cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“, and similarly
for the other four). In fact, many such citta vīthi flow even before we consciously become
aware of that “thought”.
§ If the thought object comes through the māna indriya (“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati
manoviññāṇaṃ“), that citta vīthi is called a manodvara citta vīthi, and it has 10-12 citta. Again,
many such citta vīthi flow even before we consciously become aware of that “thought”.
3. Another important point to remember is that the word “citta” is used loosely even in Buddha
Dhamma. Most times, it gives the same impression as the word “thought”. We just say “a citta comes
to the mind”.
§ The word “citta” has that “conventional” meaning, but the initial stage of a “thought” is also
called a citta.
§ See, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
4. For example, when fill a glass with water from a tap in the kitchen, we call it water. But of course
it is not pure water. If that water is analyzed in a laboratory, we will see that it has trace amounts of
contaminants. So, that glass water does not have pure water. If we fill the glass from a river, we still
call it water, but it will have even more contaminants. If we fill the glass from a stagnant pond,
contamination could be visible. But we still call it water.
§ In the same way, even though technically it is the first stage that is really can be called a citta,
we call what we consciously feel to be a citta too.
5. The initial stage of a citta is contaminated within an unbelievable short time. It evolves through
nine stages in the following sequence: citta, mano, mānasam, hadayam, pandaram, mano
manāyatanam, māna indriyam, viññāṇa, viññākkhando. [Yaṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ
paṇḍaraṃ mano manāyatanaṃ manindriyaṃ viññāṇaṃ viññāṇakkhandho...]
§ By the time it gets to the viññāṇa stage, it is a totally contaminated citta. How contaminated it
gets, depends on the thought object and one’s gathi, as we will discuss below.
§ What we experience or what are aware is that last stage.
6. Before we proceed with the discussion, let me provide a reference to the above verse, which is in
the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga“, in Section WebLink: suttacentral: 2.5.1.
Akusalacitta : “Tattha katamaṃ saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇaṃ? Yaṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ
paṇḍaraṃ mano manāyatanaṃ manindriyaṃ viññāṇaṃ viññāṇakkhandho tajjāmanoviññāṇadhātu—
idaṃ vuccati “saṅkhārapaccayā viññāṇaṃ”.
§ It should be noted that “ saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇaṃ” can be defined in different ways, and
this way it clarifies how a citta is contaminated to the viññāṇa stage.
7. By the way, this process can be seen only by a Buddha. It is perceptible and discernible (gocara)
only to the highest purified mind.
§ The Buddha explained that first to Ven. Sāriputta, when he first explained the key ideas of
Abhidhamma to Ven. Sāriputta and it took several hundred years of effort by “the bhikkhus of
the Sāriputta lineage” to do a systematic compilation of all mind phenomena.
§ That is why the Abhdhamma Pitaka was finished only at the third Sangāyanā (Buddhsit
Council); see, “Abhidhamma – Introduction“.
8. It is best to describe the actual process to understand these steps. Going back to the process of the
nine steps in the evolution of a single citta:
§ It starts with the citta stage, which is the purest stage (it has only the seven universal cetasika,
or mental factors). One is aware that one one is alive.
§ These deeper aspects are discussed in “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
9. Now that we have stated that technical point (which is not critical for this discussion), we can
proceed to the next stages.
§ At the first stage of citta, the mind just knows that the world exists; that there is a sense
impression coming through either of the five physical senses (cakkhu, sota, jivhā, ghāṇa, or
kāya indriya) or the māna indriya.
10. Let us take a specific event: Suppose it is a seeing one’s mother.
As we said above, at the first citta stage, one is just aware that a thought object came to the mind via
the eyes (cakkhu indirya).
§ Then in the mano stage, the mind “measures” or “compares” (that is why it is called the
“mano” stage) with past experiences to decide whether the object is a tree, a car, a man, a
woman, etc. In this case it decides that it is woman.
§ The next “mānasam” stage is to decide specific connection to him/herself, and in this case it is
recognized that it is one’s mother.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 339
11. Now, those steps occur for any human, including an Arahant or even the Buddha. One cannot
live without getting to this stage. The Buddha was able to differentiate between Ven. Ānanda, Ven.
Sāriputta, Visaka, or King Kosala, and addressed them accordingly.
§ In fact, in the Karaniyamatta Sutta, what is emphasized by “mānasambhāva ye aparimānam..”,
is to cultivate “mānasam” to the optimum level. That way, one can easily figure out how deal
with a given situation.
12. At the next step, a normal human will generate the “saññā of one’s mother” and gets attached,
i.e., forms loving feelings; see, “Saññā – What It Really Means“. This is called the “hadayam” stage.
Remember that all nine steps happen in a very short time, and do not involve conscious thinking.
§ However, in the case of an Arahant, the process does not come to this stage, and thus not
evolve any further. Decisions are made by the mind just based on recognizing a given person,
regardless of the connection between oneself and that person. Even if it is someone who is
trying to kill oneself, feelings towards that person will be no different from feelings towards
one’s own mother. This is why I say that we cannot even imagine the mind of an Arahant.
13. Proceeding to the next stage of “pandaram”, that feeling established at the “hadayam” stage is
strengthened in the case of an especially close person like one’s mother. It is like allocating more
“energy” for a closer person. If it was a distant relative, for example, it may do little at the
“pandaram” stage.
§ It is also important to note that it may go the totally opposite way for an arch enemy; here one
will make very strong bad feelings about such a person.
14. Now comes the next stage of “mano manāyatanam”. Here one’s mind becomes an “āyatana” or
“be receptive” (or hateful) to that person depending on the level of attachment (revulsion) formed at
the hadayam and pandaram stages.
§ That is strengthened (to a level based on the feelings generated in the previous steps) at the
“mana indriyam” stage.
§ It is also important to note that this “mana indriyam” stage is different from the mana indriya
involved in “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“.
15. At the viññāṇa stage, one’s mind is totally removed from “ñāṇa” or wisdom or “the reality of
nature”. As long as one has worldly desires (i.e., cravings), one has not stopped the viññāṇa stage
(i.e., until one becomes an Arahant).
§ Then at the last stage of viññānakkhandha, the mind strengthens attachments cultivated in the
past, evaluates the current situation, and makes new hopes and plans for the future. That is the
last stage.
§ That last stage is what we actually experience. In fact, we don’t even experience that last stage
of a single citta as an entity on its own, or even the cumulative effect of 17 cittas in a citta vīthi.
Thousands of citta vīthi may flow within a fraction of second before we become aware of it.
16. Aṅguttara Nikāya 1; Accharāsaṅghātavagga; Sutta #51 is a very short sutta. Here is the
complete sutta: “Pabhassaramidaṃ, bhikkhave, cittaṃ. Tañca kho āgantukehi upakkilesehi
upakkiliṭṭhaṃ. Taṃ assutavā puthujjano yathābhūtaṃ nappajānāti. Tasmā ‘assutavato puthujjanassa
cittabhāvanā natthī’ti vadāmī”ti.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, a (pure) citta has pabhassara nature. That citta is contaminated by
defilements (keles or klesha). A normal human who has not heard my Dhamma (assutavā
puthujjano) is not aware of this true nature. I do not recommend citta bhāvanā to them“.
§ This sutta clearly states the importance of knowing that a pure citta becomes contaminated to
the level of viññāṇa.
17. Once we have those basics, now we can build on that and try to make the picture even more clear.
§ For example, when seeing an attractive object, the mind may become greedy by incorporating
lobha, issa, etc. (asobhana cetasika) that bends the mind in an immoral way.
§ Upon seeing a helpless person, one may generate compassionate thoughts by incorporating
metta, karuna, etc. (some sobhana cetasika).
18. Therefore, we can now see why two factors are play important roles in which way the thought
process would evolve. One is one’s gati, and the other is how strong the thought object is.
§ One with “lobha gati” can be easily influenced even by a slightly attractive object. One with
much less ‘lobha gati” may not be perturbed by such an object, but could be attracted by a
highly attractive object. Possible situations are endless, depending on the sense object and one’s
gati. This is a good vipassana subject to contemplate on.
19. Another important thing is that when one repeatedly accesses a given thought object, then one’s
viññāṇa for such objects will be cultivated. That in turn will cultivate one’s gati in that direction, and
thus it becomes a self-feeding cyclic process in that direction. A good example is how an innocent
teenager gets addicted to alcohol or drugs.
§ If we thought a bit more on the above case, we can see the involvement of “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa”. When one starts thinking consciously (generating vacī saṅkhāra) about drinking and
then also do it frequently (kāya saṅkhāra), then one’s “drinking viññāṇa” will grow in strength.
§ One should really think about one’s own bad habits, or “bad viññāṇa” that keep popping up to
the mind regularly. By being mindful, we can suppress such thoughts (by thinking about their
bad consequences or ādinava), we can reduce such bad gathi. Similarly, one can strengthen
one’s “good gai” by engaging more in corresponding activities.
§ That is the basis of Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna.
1. First on a different issue, I hope everyone will understand my reasons for emphasizing Pāli words.
In many cases, it is difficult or even impossible to find a single English word to convey the meaning
of a Pāli word (e.g., anicca); these are powerful words that pack a lot of content. Here, there is no
equivalent word in English for kilesa.
§ It is best to use Pāli words (and some Sinhala words like “niveema” or “suva“), but with an
understanding of what they mean; see, “Why is it Necessary to Learn Key Pāli Words?“. So,
don’t be discouraged by these Pāli terms; keep reading to the end and you will see it start
making sense. You can “fill-in-the-gaps” by reading relevant posts afterwards.
§ Furthermore, this post is mainly on introducing some key concepts involving many Pāli words.
In the upcoming weeks, I will be discussing them and simplifying these concepts in the new
“Living Dhamma” section, which used to be called “New Approach to Meditation”. This post is
going to be our reference.
2. Kilesa in Pāli or Keles in Sinhala (where “kelesanava” means “make something impure”) are
related to gathi and āsava (in both Pāli and Sinhala) and are the main reasons why we do things
(saṅkhāra) to perpetuate the sansāric journey; the closest English translation for kilesa is
“accumulated impurities in the mind”.
§ Kilesa give rise to immoral thoughts or akusala citta via asobhana cetasika, as we discuss
below. Asobana cetasika are listed in “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.
§ Sobhana or asobhana cetasika (moral or immoral mental factors) are what makes a given citta
a moral (kusala) or immoral (akusala); for details, see, “Citta and Cetasika“.
§ As you can guess, sobhana and asobhana mean “beautiful” and “non-beautiful” respectively, in
Pāli and Sinhala.
3. There are several posts on related key concepts of san, saṅkhāra, saṃsāra, etc. Also gathi (habits)
and āsava (cravings) are cultivated via repeated bad habits; all these are related to kilesa and lead to a
set of unique kilesa for each living being; of course they keep changing even for a given person.
§ When one removes all these mental impurities or kilesa (or keles), one attains kilesa
parinibbana. This is also called saupadisesa Nibbāna because that person is still “in this world
of 31 realms”. This is the state of a living Arahant; he/she has removed all mental impurities
from the mind.
§ When that Arahant dies, there is no rebirth and Nibbāna is “complete”; that is called
anupadisesa Nibbāna.
§ It must be noted that Abhidhamma Pitaka of the Tipiṭaka was not fully developed during the
time of the Buddha. So, in the Sutta pitaka, mostly the term kilesa was used. The Buddha
succinctly described Abhidhamma to Ven. Sariputta, and it took several generations of
Bhikkhus of “Sariputta lineage” to fully assemble the Abhidhamma structure. It was finalized
only at the third Buddhist Council; see, “Abhidhamma – Introduction“.
6. There are 4 universal asobhana cetasika that are in ALL akusala citta. They are: moha (delusion),
uddhacca (restlessness), ahirika (shameless of wrong doings), and anottappa (fearlessness of wrong
doings). Since all akusala citta are prevented from arising only at the Arahant stage, it is easy to see
that these 4 asobhana cetasika or mental impurities are completely removed only at the Arahant
stage. However, all akusala cetasika reduce in strength at each stage of Nibbāna.
[Universal akusala cetasika (4) : moha⇒avijjā, ahirika, anatoppa, uddhacca
Paticular akusala cetasika (10) : lobha⇒rāga, diṭṭhi, māna, dosa⇒paṭigha, issa, maccariya,
kukkucca, thina, middha, vicikicchā]
§ The following asobhana cetasika are removed at the Sotāpanna stage: diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, thina,
middha, issa, maccariya, kukkucca. Furthermore, lobha, dosa, moha are reduced in strength to
rāga, paṭigha, avijjā.
§ The above clarification could help one decide whether one has attained the Sotāpanna stage
(see the meanings of those Pāli terms in #4 above): for example, one should have lost jealousy,
tendency to hide wealth from others, etc). What this really means is that one has realized the
worthlessness of material things to a significant extent; that comes with comprehending the
anicca nature to some extent.
§ At the Sakadāgāmī stage, kāma rāga (which is a part of rāga) and paṭigha are reduced in
strength (they still keep the same names). At the Anāgāmī stage, both kāma rāga and paṭigha
are completely removed.
§ The remaining asobhana cetasika (avijjā, ahirika, anatoppa, uddhacca, māna) are completely
removed at the Arahant stage.
7. Thus, we can see that many “mental impurities” or kilesa or asobhana cetasika are removed at the
Sotāpanna stage, even though a Sotāpanna completely abstain from only one akusala kamma as
discussed in “What is the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“.
§The Buddha said that a Sotāpanna has equivalent of a thumb-full of kilesa left compared to that
of the volume of the Earth for a normal human. Now we can see this is because many akusala
cetasika are removed and others are reduced in strength at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Note that akusala kamma (immoral deeds) are different from akusala citta (immoral thoughts).
There are ten akusala kamma and 12 akusala citta. An akusala kamma is done with an
asobhana citta. Mind is a very complex entity, and all these different parameters are needed to
fully describe what happens in a mind. But they are all inter-consistent. With time, one will be
able to grasp many different aspects of the mind with these parameters.
§ All different types of defilements removed or reduced at each stage of Nibbāna are listed in
“Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna“. That table provides a complete summary in one
place.
8. Now that we have taken care of the technicalities, let us discuss some practical things that are of
use when figuring out how different types of cetasika influence our thoughts.
§ As we can see from #6, moha (or the reduced form of avijjā) is in all akusala citta. There are
only 12 types of akusala citta, and 8 of them have lobha (or a reduced form of kāma rāga, rūpa
rāga, or arūpa rāga). When one is attracted to a sense object, one of these 8 akusala citta arise.
§ Lobha and dosa do not arise together. There are only two akusala citta with the dosa cetasika.
When one is repulsed by a sense object, one of these 2 akusala citta arise.
§ The other two akusala citta do not have either lobha or dosa, but only the moha as a root.
These two cittas arise not due to greed or hate, but purely due to moha (or the reduced form of
avijjā).
§ I hope this helps in getting a sense of the types of akusala citta that we generate each day. More
details can be found in the post, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“.
9. Each person’s kilesa are thus some combination of the 14 asobhana cetasika, but keep changing.
The goal is to remove them gradually. In practice, this is done by changing one’s gathi (habits)
and āsava (cravings); see, “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati)“.
§ Up until the Sotāpanna stage, none of the asobhana cetasika is removed in the citta (thoughts)
that arise in a person. They may be temporarily subdued or even lessened in strength
temporarily, but never removed.
§ Of course, these kilesas (or asobhana cetasika) do not show up all the time. When they are
triggered by an external stimulus (like when seeing an attractive person or an enemy), they can
come to surface. This “bubbling up to the surface” is called anusaya.
§ When one is engaged in a comprehensive anariya meditation program (like those 7-day or 14-
day meditation retreats), these kilesas (or asobhana cetasika) do not get a chance to come to the
surface. The environment at a retreat is such that “temptations” would be minimal. Thus one
could be enjoying nirāmisa sukha at such a retreat.
§ However, when one comes back form the retreat, one is exposed to all kinds of sense inputs and
those WILL re-awaken same old akusala citta burdened with asobhana cetasika.
10. However, when one removes a set of kilesa ( asobhana cetasika) at each stage of Nibbāna,
they are PERMANENTLY removed or reduced per #6 above. At that point, no external stimulus
can trigger those asobhana cetasika that have been permanently removed.
§ This is the difference between the temporary relief many have experienced at meditation
retreats and the permanent relief upon becoming a Sotāpanna, i.e., between the anariya and
Ariya Paths.
11. Since all these Pāli words could make you somewhat confused at the first read, let us take an
analogy to clear up what kilesa (asobhana cetasika) do to our thoughts. Here we compare citta (or
thoughts) to a glass of pure water. Most of our thoughts are like clear water: they are not immoral or
moral, just neutral. We see, hear, etc. millions of things a day, but generate moral or immoral
thoughts only in a relatively few cases.
§ In this analogy, immoral thoughts are like dirty water. Just like added dirt makes water dirty,
when asobhana cetasika gets incorporated to a citta, that citta becomes immoral. But how do
these asobhana cetasika get incorporated into a citta?
§ Since a citta arises in a billionth of a second, there is no way for us to control what kind of
cetasika get incorporated into a citta. It happens automatically!
§ We can get an idea of how that happens by looking at a glass water with some dirt in it.
12. Even though the glass of water has dirt in it, if the water is left undisturbed for a while, the dirt
gets settled at the bottom and the water becomes relatively clear. Our minds are like that too. Most of
the dirt (mental impurities, kilesa, or asobhana cetasika) remain hidden most of the time.
§ However, if the water is stirred with a straw, the dirt comes up to the top and the water becomes
dirty.
§ In the case of the mind, the stirrer is a desired (attractive) or an undesired (repulsive) sense
event. Mainly the asobhana cetasika of greed and hate come to the surface (always
accompanied by the four universal cetasika mentioned in #6 , but could be accompanied by a
few more of the other 11 asobhana cetasika, depending on the situation.
§ The other two related parameters of gathi and āsavas contribute in setting up the exact
asobhana cetasika that will arise based on a given sense input. For example, an alcoholic only
has to see a bottle of whiskey to get the urge to have a drink; only a person with ingrained
habits of a thief will be tempted to steal an item from a shop just on impulse.
13. Another related point is that a glass with dirt in it ALWAYS has some dirt in the water, even
though most of the “heavy stuff” goes to the bottom. This “ever present” muddy color can be
compared to the pancanivarana (five hindrances), that makes our minds “covered” almost at all
times.
§ Just like the dirty water prevents us from seeing what is in the water, a mind covered with
pancanivarana is unable “see through”.
§ These “ever-present” pancanivarana are responsible for the “sense of agitation” or “sense of
unfulfillment” that is there with us most of the time. This is what X experienced when she got
into a regular meditation schedule: “Living Dhamma – Introduction“.
§ It was like getting rid of the dark color of the water (while the dirt still remains at the bottom).
The mind can become relatively more pure for a considerable amount of time when engaged in
a mediation program. This is called vishkambana pahāna (or prahāna), in contrast to tadanga
pahāna (suppressing only for a short time) and ucceda pahāna (permanent removal). We will
discuss this in upcoming discussions.
§ By the way, while listening to a discourse or reading a Dhamma post, one could get into
tadanga pahāna and the content may become easily understood, and one could momentarily
feel the nirāmisa sukha too. This is why one should read these posts at a time when the mind is
relatively calm, in order to make conditions for tadanga pahāna optimum, and even extend to
vishkambana pahāna, i.e, for a day or longer.
14. Now we can see how nirāmisa sukha comes during meditation sessions (especially in regular
meditation sessions like at a meditation retreat), per question raised by Y in a previous post, i.e.,
“Nirāmisa sukha is felt by which citta?”.
§ Nirāmisa sukha appears when the asobhana cetasika (or kilesa) AND the pancanivarana are
SUPPRESSED.
§ In the next post, we will address the issue of how a Sotāpanna‘s mind automatically blocks
certain types asobhana cetasika arising, via PERMANENTLY removing pancanivara and also
by completely removing some of the kilesa or asobhana cetasika.
15. Above is a self-consistent, condensed summary. In the upcoming discussions, we will go into
details and discuss the two types of hidden suffering in simple terms.
Next in the series, “Suffering in This Life – Role of Mental Impurities“.
4.4.2 Suffering in This Life – Role of Mental Impurities
September 2, 2016
1. In the post, “Starting on the Path Even without Belief in Rebirth” in this series (“Living
Dhamma“), we introduced two types of hidden suffering revealed to the world by the Buddha, and
discussed the first type of suffering that we experience in this life.
§ Here we continue that discussion, and figure out ways to relieve that suffering.
2. In the previous post, “What Are Kilesa (Mental Impurities)? – Connection to Cetasika“, we
discussed how asobhana cetasika represent the mental impurities or kilesas.
§ In this and a few more desanās, we will discuss that highly condensed post, in order to simplify
and clarify the main ideas relevant to practice.
3. Here is the desanā (You may need to adjust volume control on your computer):
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 2 - Suffering in This Life - Role of Mental Impurities
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 2 - Suffering in This Life - Role of Mental Impurities (Original
- Larger file size)
1. This is the sixth post in this series. It is important to follow the series from the beginning. All posts
are at: “Living Dhamma“.
§ Here I want show that what we have been discussing in this section is exactly what is
recommended in the beginning of the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta.
§ Here we will discuss the key verse, “ātāpī sampajāno, satimā vineyya loke abhijjhā
domanassam“ that appears in the sutta numerous times. It is also the basis of the Ānāpāanasati
bhāvanā.
2. Many people believe that the Sutta is basically a kammattana that one recites or “meditate on”. But
it is much more than a kammattana. I will provide more evidence in future posts, but here is the audio
on the basics of the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (you may need to control the volume in your computer):
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 3 - Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta - Relevance to Suffering in This Life
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 3 - Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta - Relevance to Suffering in This Life
(Original - Larger file size)
Next post in the series, “How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?“.
4.4.4 How Are Gati and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
September 22, 2016
In this post, we will discuss why mano saṅkhāra are different from kaya and vacī saṅkhāra.
Understanding this will help one to realize how our gathi can AUTOMATICALLY give rise to
immoral thoughts.
§ It will also help one understand how such initial immoral thoughts can be overcome by
purposefully generating moral thoughts. This is actually the basis of the Satipaṭṭhāna and
Ānāpānasati bhāvanā.
§ Furthermore, we will discuss the issue of where our gathi, kilesa, or cetasika are “stored”.
This is the seventh post in this section: “Living Dhamma“. To get full benefits, one should start from
the first post. I am using a combination of text and audio files to convey a lot of information in this
section.
Here are the audio files :
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 4 - How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 4 - How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
(Original - Larger file size)
October 22, 2017: I just listened to the above audio after one year. They are good and provide solid
basis for understanding gati and how they can be changed by controlling vacī and kāya saṅkhāra that
we have control over.
§ It is important to realize that many citta vīthi flow in a second. But each subsequent citta vīthi is
influenced by the previous one. So, they can take one on a downward path very quickly unless
we intervene by being mindful.
§ It is very important to realize that: mano saṅkhāra are generated AUTOMATICALLY based on
our gati. Vacī saṅkhāra are generated when we “talk to ourselves, without getting the words
out”. Both such “internal speech” and actual speech are associated with vacī saṅkhāra; bodily
actions are kāya saṅkhāra.
§ July 26, 2019: Reader Siebe just pointed out that at 14.30 mins I had defined speech as ‘kāya
saṅkhāra. That is not correct, as explained in more detail in “Correct Meaning of Vacī
saṅkhāra“.
§ We become CONSCIOUS about both vacī and kāya saṅkhāra quickly and thus have control
over them; see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī saṅkhāra“.
Posts mentioned in the desanā
4. How thoughts can affect other people: “Transfer of Merits (Pattidana) – How Does it Happen?“.
5. The brain architecture of humans and animals: “Truine Brain: How the Mind Rewires the Brain via
Meditation/Habits“.
6. The post mentioned in the discussion on the question “Where are these gati or kilesa or cetasika
are maintained or stored?”: “Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial“.
Next in the series, “Noble Eightfold Path – Role of Sobhana Cetasika“.
4.4.5 Noble Eightfold Path – Role of Sobhana Cetasika
1. In previous posts in this section, we have discussed how nirāmisa sukha or “peace of mind” arises
due to both removal of asobhana cetasika (non-beautiful mental factors) or kilesa AND cultivation of
sobhana cetasika (beautiful mental factors).
§ In this post, I will point out that 7 of the 8 factors in the Noble Eightfold Path are in the set of
sobhana cetasika.
2. The most important fact that one needs to comprehend from the posts in this series up to this point,
is that our minds are heated/agitated by the presence of asobhana cetasika or kilesa or defilements.
§ On the other hand, our minds are soothed and comforted and made joyful by the presence of
sobhana cetasika.
§ One may not realize this until one comprehends this fact and actually practice cultivating
sobhana cetasika while suppressing/removing asobhana cetasika.
3. As explained elsewhere at the site, Abhidhamma with its methodical analysis of citta and cetasika
was not finalized for a few hundred years after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha at the Third Buddhist
Council. This enlarged Canon completed at the Third Council was committed to writing in Sri Lanka
in the first century BCE (29 BCE) at the Aluvihara Monastery at the Fourth Buddhist Council. This
was the last Buddhist Council attended by Arahants.
§ Soon after that the decline of the pure Dhamma of the Buddha started its decline with the
simultaneous rise of the Mahayana; see, the section “Historical Background“.
§ When Buddhaghosa wrote the Visuddhimagga, which was presumed to be a summary of the
Tipiṭaka, even Theravadins stopped using the Tipiṭaka for convenience.
§ Therefore, no one seemed to have realized some important possible usages of cetasika: First,
kilesa are the same as asobhana cetasika. Second, components of the Noble Eightfold Path are
in the set of sobhana cetasika. This makes it easier to comprehend how one could
systematically follow the Path, and that is focus of this post.
§ I will discuss the details in upcoming desanās, but here I would like to provide a summary that
we can use for that discussion. Another such summary post that will used in these desanās is a
summary given in one of the previous posts: “What Are Kilesa (Mental Impurities)? –
Connection to Cetasika“.
4. Let us start by continuing from the last desanā, where we discussed how INITIAL thoughts in
response to a sense event arises without us even being conscious about it. These initial thoughts
arise AUTOMATICALLY due to the set of sobhana/asobhana cetasika or gathi that we have. Any
akusala thoughts arise due to our kilesa which are the same as asobhana cetasika.
§ However, because our speech and bodily actions are much slower than the rising of those initial
thoughts, it is possible for us to keep vigilant and reverse any such reactive akusala thoughts
that are AUTOMATICALLY generated.
§ This is the basis of both Satipaṭṭhāna and Ānāpānasati bhāvanā. Please listen to that previous
desanā on “How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?” and fully comprehend this
important concept. Here is the link to that desanā in two parts (there is volume control on the
right, but for the second desanā, you may need to turn up volume in your computer):
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 4 - How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 4 - How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
(Original - Larger file size)
§ We also discussed the evidence for such gathi to be associated with any given person, and
addressed the question of where they are “stored”.
5. We also saw in the above desanās that those initial thoughts that arise in response to a sense event
are called mano saṅkhāra. Therefore, we do not have conscious control over mano saṅkhāra, AND
they arise within a fraction of a second DUE TO our gathi (set of sobhana/asobhana cetasika).
§ December 5, 2017: Such akusala mano saṅkhāra CAN then lead to the generation of vacī
saṅkhāra (silent speech in our heads and speech), and kaya saṅkhāra (speech and bodily
actions). This is different from the desanā, and I have discussed the reasons for this revision in
“Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ But, if we are mindful (sati), we can catch any such akusala mano saṅkhāra and make sure they
do not lead to akusala vacī and kaya saṅkhāra.
§ In the Eightfold Path, such deliberately generated vacī saṅkhāra are called sammā sankappa or
sammā sankalpa.
§ And those sammā sankappa were generated because one acted with sammā sati.
6. In the above desanās, we discussed an example of a person X finding a lost ring. If X had strong
greedy gathi, The initial thoughts (mano saṅkhāra) could be to keep the ring for himself. However, if
X knows about being mindful, X has time to evaluate the situation with vacī saṅkhāra (in his head),
and to come to conclusion that it is immoral to keep the ring for himself.
§ If he made that correct decision, even after thinking about it, he can prevent an akusala kamma
of stealing. Not only that, he can do a kusala kamma by making sure to get that ring returned to
the rightful owner.
§ So, now we can see the critical roles of sammā sati and sammā sankappa in the Eightfold Path.
We have the opportunity (unlike animals) to rationally think about our initial REACTIVE
decisions, and to reverse them if they are immoral.
7. If X acted with sammā sati and realized the problem with the initial reaction and made the right
decision with sammā sankappa, then he can take next steps to sammā vaca (moral speech) and
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 349
sammā kammanta (moral actions) to implement that decision. He can walk over to the counter, hand
over the ring, and tell the office personnel to return the ring to the owner.
§ This is just one possible example. We come across many such instances during a day. In
another example, one may get annoyed by someone accidentally stepping on one’s foot in a
crowded place, and start yelling at that person without thinking about the consequences. That
person obviously did not intentionally do that, especially since it is likely to be a stranger.
§ Even if one started getting the words out, one could quickly stop oneself and smile at the person
indicating that it is no big deal. That would make that person to be relieved, because most likely
he/she felt bad about it.
§ This simple act of kindness would lead to a “cooling down” on both sides. The other person
will feel a relief and will thank for the kindness. Furthermore, it could have escalated into a
shouting match and could have led to “heated minds” on both sides.
8. When one sees the benefits of such mindful behavior, one will start doing more. One will start
living a moral life. This is sammā ajiva or moral livelihood.
§ Not only that, one will make an extra effort to be mindful and catch any reactive thoughts that
could lead to such akusala kamma. This is sammā vayama, or moral effort.
§ In a few weeks of months, this will start changing one’s ingrained gathi. When one stops using
those asobhana cetasika, their power will diminish with time. At the same time, one is
cultivating sobhana cetasika (i.e., sammā sati, sammā sankappa, sammā vaca, sammā
kammanata, sammā ajiva, sammā vayama). Thus bad gathi will diminish and good gathi will
grow.
9. Now, X was able to think rationally about the bad consequences of his initial decision (mano
saṅkhāra) to keep the ring, because he had sammā diṭṭhi or moral vision, to some extent. Deep down
he knew that such an act of stealing is immoral, and was able to fight off the tendency to keep it.
§ Sammā diṭṭhi is related to the sobhana cetasika of paññā, which is loosely translated as
“wisdom”. This “wisdom” cannot be cultivated by reading books, even just by reading
Dhamma. The paññā cetasika is cultivated by both learning Dhamma and by living it (i.e., by
following the Eightfold Path), thereby getting rid of moha.
10. Now let us examine the connection between the other factors in the Eightfold Path (here the
mundane version) and some of the sobhana cetasika.
§ First, three factors in the Eightfold Path have exactly the same names in the list of sobhana
cetasika: sammā vaca, sammā kammanata, sammā ajiva; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.
11. Sammā sankalpa are the vacī saṅkhāra that we deliberately generate even if we have akusala
mano saṅkhāra arising due to sense inputs. Vacī saṅkhāra are described in the suttas as vitakka
(pronounced “vithakka”)and vicara (pronounced “vichaara”). Vitakka is turning the mind towards a
thought object and vicara is keeping the mind around that thought object.
§ Those who are familiar with jhānas know that, vitakka and vicara are two jhāna factors in
anariya jhānas. In the first anariya jhāna, one can for example turn the mind to a kasina object
(vitakka) and keep it there (vicara). In Ariya jhānas, they are called savitakka and savicara
because one is focused on Nibbāna.
§ So, you can see that maintaining sammā sankalpa is the same as generating “moral” vitakka
and vicara or kusala vacī saṅkhāra. Remember that these are generated in the head, not spoken
out. They are called “sankalpana” in Sinhala.
§ Also, we note that vitakka and vicara could be used in immoral path too. A master thief
planning a robbery will focus on that task and spend many hours thinking about the plan. So,
those two cetasika fall under the category called particulars or pakinnaka; they can appear in
kusala or akusala thoughts as needed.
12. Now, sammā vayama arises from another of these particulars or pakinnaka cetasika, the viriya
cetasika.
§ When one is making an effort to live a moral life, that sammā vayama. If one is making an
effort towards an immoral life, like that master thief, then he is making micchā vayama.
§ Of course the sati cetasika, which is a sobhana cetasika, is sammā sati.
13. Now we are left with sammā samādhi. This is the only factor that is not related to a cetasika
directly. Most people have the idea that samādhi is jhāna or at least is attained only in formal
meditation. But it is much more deeper. In the next desanā, I will discuss samādhi, together with the
implications of what is summarized in this post.
§ We are trying to comprehend and reinforce the FOUNDATION of Buddha Dhamma: How one
can remove the “thaapa” or “heat” from the mind by getting rid of asobhana cetasika (kilesa)
and SIMULTANEOUSLY “cool down” the mind and bring joy to it, by cultivating sobhana
cetasika.
This was discussed in the first desanā in this series:
“The Hidden Suffering that We All Can Understand“
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 1 - The Hidden Suffering That We All Can Understand
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 1 - The Hidden Suffering That We All Can Understand
(Original - Larger file size)
§ More details were given in the following two desanās:
§In the end one will be able to see how different pieces of the puzzle (including paṭicca
samuppāda) all fit together to make an easy-to-see picture of the whole process. That will make
it easier to grasp the Tilakkhaṇa, and advance to the next stage.
§ All these can be shown be consistent with the scheme of sīla, samādhi, paññā. In the Cetana
Karaneeya Sutta, the Buddha has detailed how sīla (moral conduct) leads to nirāmisa sukha,
and nirāmisa sukha leads to samādhi, and samādhi in turn leads to paññā. We will discuss all
these in the upcoming desanās.
Next in the series, “Getting to Samādhi“.
4.4.6 Getting to Samadhi
October 7, 2016
1. In the post “Noble Eightfold Path – Role of Sobhana Cetasika“, it was discussed how 7 of the 8
factors in the Noble Eightfold Path are related to some of the sobhana cetasika or moral mental
factors.
2. In the following desanā, we discuss how the cultivation of those 7 factors lead to the 8th factor in
the Noble Path, Sammā Samādhi, or at least the mundane version of it first (volume control will
appear on right when you start playing):
“Getting to Samādhi“
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 5 - Getting to Samādhi
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 5 - Getting to Samādhi (Original - Larger file size)
3. Before one can comprehend the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta), one needs to get to mundane
Sammā Samādhi. There are two kinds of Sammā Samādhi and also a micchā samādhi:
§ What is Samādhi? – Three Kinds of Mindfulness
§ Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths, and Samādhi
Next in the series, “Micchā Diṭṭhi – Connection to Hethu Phala (Cause and Effect)“, …
4.4.7 Sexual Orientation – Effects of Kamma and Gathi (Saṅkhāra)
This post will be helpful in not only clarifying Buddha’s teachings on sexual orientation, but also that
there can be many varieties of saṅkhāra, viññāṇa, and corresponding bhava and jathi arising
according to paṭicca samuppāda.
1. In this beginning-less rebirth process, it is likely that we all had switched between male or female
many times, just as we are likely to have been born in most of the 31 realms in the past.
§ It is said that the Bodhisattva — before becoming Buddha Gotama — was a female when the
paramita process to become a Buddha was initiated.
§ However, once the paramita process progressed, and the Bodhisattva became a male, it never
switched back to female.
§ Only a male can actually be a Buddha.
2. Whether one is male or female is predominantly determined by one’s saṅkhāra, and not due to a
past kamma.
§ But in some cases, kamma could be the direct cause. For example, if one intentionally severed
or mutilated another’s sexual organs, it is possible that one may be born without a sexual organ.
Such a person is called a “napunsaka” in Sinhala (pandaka in Pāli), but I am not aware of a
corresponding English word.
§ An eunuch is a person who is castrated, so that also could be due to a kamma vipāka of a past
kamma.
3. Male/female distinction is there only in the kāma loka. In the brahma realms (higher 20 realms),
there is no such distinction. Brahmas do not have dense physical bodies or sexual organs.
§ One is born in either the 16 rūpa loka realms or the 4 arūpa loka realms (brahma realms)
because one has given up all desires for bodily pleasures, including sex, because one has seen
the value of nirāmisa sukha (and jhānic pleasures) that can be achieved by giving up bodily
pleasures.
4. One is born in kāma loka because one likes bodily pleasures, especially those associated with taste,
smell, and sex. Of course, vision and sound that help satisfy those three bodily pleasures also come
into play here.
§ One is born in human or deva realms in the kāma loka because one has done meritorious
deeds (puñña kamma). There are female devas, who have attained those births because of
their puñña kamma just like male devas. One is born a female deva, because one has
cultivated “iththi saṅkhāra“; see #5 below.
§ One is born in the four apāya realms in the kāma loka because one has done immoral deeds
(pāpa kamma). Here the corresponding saṅkhāra are apuññabhi saṅkhāra.
5. One is born male or female due to whether one cultivates “purisa saṅkhāra” or “iththi saṅkhāra”
by thinking, speaking, and doing things accordingly. One does not do either puñña abhisaṅkhāra or
apuñña abhisaṅkhāra here.
§ Such saṅkhāra (kaya, vacī, and mano) are not necessarily meritorious (puññabhi saṅkhāra) or
immoral (apuññabhi saṅkhāra). Those are in line with pure habits based on “purisa gathi”
and “iththi gathi“.
§ This can be compared to cultivating habits for playing a certain musical instrument. They are
called “vāsana keles“, keles that do not have good or bad kamma vipāka, but more like
ingrained habits.
6. Purisa is the Pāli or Sinhala word for a male and the word comes from “piri” or “full”. A male is
likely to give more (especially to the wife) than to take from the wife. Iththi is the Pāli (and old
Sinhala) word for female, and means “ithiri” or “left over space to be filled”. For example, if a cup is
full that is “piri“; if it is not full, it needs more to become full, it has “ithiri“.
§ So, a male is likely to willingly buy things for the wife, but does not care much about his
appearance. Most wives expect gifts and sustenance.
§ However, these “purisa gathi” and “iththi gathi” can have large variations. A male has more
“purisa gathi” than “iththi gathi“. But we do see “alpha males” with close to 100% “purisa
gathi” as well as females with very high “iththi gathi“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 353
§ On the other hand, we also see females who like to act and dress more like males, and also
males who like to act and dress more feminine. If they cultivate those gathi more, a sex change
is possible in future lives (in rare cases even in this life).
7. In most families, if one examines the wardrobes of the husband and wife, one is likely to find many
more items in the wife’s wardrobe (in particular, the man may have a couple of pairs of shoes but the
wife will have many!). Females wear much more jewellery too.
§ Furthermore, a female is more concerned about the appearance of her (and her husband). A guy
usually grabs something to wear, but a woman is likely to pay much more attention. I know by
experience that I have been “instructed politely” to change into something better many times
when going out.
§ Thus females constantly think about theirs (and their spouses and children’s) appearance. This
is not necessarily due to greed, but mainly due to sansāric habits.
8. Therefore, as far as attaining Nibbāna, it does not matter whether one is a male, female, or
somewhere in between (with mixed gathi).
§ One is born in the deva realms due to good kamma vipāka, and there are male and female
devas, just like in the human and animal realms. The type of sex is not determined by kamma
vipāka.
§ All brahma realms are “unisex“. They do not have bhava dasaka, which determine the sex
type. Brahmas do not have dense bodies to experience touch, taste of foods, or smells. They
have very fine bodies with just the hadaya vatthu, kaya dasaka, cakkhu dasaka, and sota
dasaka.
§ Therefore, a brahma “body” has only a few suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], and is much much
smaller than an atom in modern science. So, it is clear why sense pleasures are absent in
brahma loka.
9. It is important to realize that there are moral gathi due to puññābhisaṅkhāra (puñña
abhisaṅkhāra), immoral gathi due to apuññābhisaṅkhāra (apuñña abhisaṅkhāra), and “kammically
neutral” gathi due to saṅkhāra that are not abhisaṅkhāra.
§ While one is born in the human bhava, one would also have a “iththi bhava” (as a female) or
“purisa bhava” (as a male).
§ Not only that, one could be born in an “angry bhava” for a given period of time that would be
triggered by a sense event such as seeing an enemy — if one has cultivated angry gathi by
thinking, speaking, and acting with an angry mindset.
§ One could be born in a “greedy bhava” the same way. If we start acting mindfully to think,
speak, and act with less greed, those greedy gathi will reduce over time.
§ The more one thinks, speaks, and acts in a “female way”, one will be cultivating “female
gathi“; but these are not moral or immoral saṅkhāra as we discussed above.
10. In any of these cases, the more saṅkhāra one makes, one builds up the corresponding viññāṇa
(saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa) and so on until it gets to strengthening upādāna and thus strengthening
bhava (upādāna paccayā bhava).
· Therefore, paṭicca samuppāda explains not only how bhava in the rebirth process, but also in
bhava that last only for short periods of time, like getting into an “angry state of mind” or
“angry bhava“.
11. Another possibility that may come into play in a transgender person (a person whose sex is
changed during the lifetime) can be understood of one understands the role of the gandhabba (mental
body) that dictates the functioning of the physical body. Gandhabba is not a Mahayana concept:
“Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka“.
§ When a gandhabba goes into a womb, it is not firmly attached to the zygote (the cell formed by
the union of the father and the mother) during the first several weeks.
§ Sometimes, the gandhabba just leaves the womb if it turns out to be not a good match with the
parents. This is the reason for a miscarriage.
§ If a gandhabba leaves the womb within such a short time period, in some cases another
gandhabba can enter the womb and take possession of the partially formed physical body that
was abandoned by the previous gandhabba. Now, it may happen that the second gandhabba is
of opposite sex.
§ For example, suppose the first gandhabba was a male and the second a female. So, this female
is thus taking hold of a physical body that was taking shape to be a male and thus continue to
form a male body. Once born as a male baby, and while growing the female character may start
to convert the physical body to that of a female. This is what happens to a transgender person.
12. One is bound to the kāma loka because one has craving for bodily pleasures, whether it is tasting
good food, watching movies, listening to music, smelling nice fragrances, or in engaging in sexual
activities. If one does those activities without engaging in immoral activities, then the only harm done
is to be eligible to be born in the kāma loka.
§ One cannot be freed from even the higher realms in the kāma loka (human and deva realms), if
one has desires for such bodily pleasures. However, it becomes relevant only at the Anāgāmī
stage. A Sotāpanna or a Sakadāgāmī has not given up desires for sensual pleasures.
§ I have not seen anything in the Tipiṭaka that distinguishes between sexual activities based on
who the partners are. So, it seems to me that homosexual or bisexual activities are not that
different from heterosexual activities as far as kammic consequences are concerned. They are
all done to achieve bodily pleasures.
§ However, if one engages in any immoral activities — in particular breaking the five precepts —
then one would be eligible to be born in the lowest four realms of the kāma loka, the apāyas.
§ I specifically made the comment on the homosexuality in answering a specific question by a
reader. The main point is to make sure that any pleasurable activity at the expense of hurting
someone will have bad consequences, and depending on the nature, could make one eligible to
be born in the apāyas.
13. One way to understand the anicca nature is to take a good look at the transient nature of our
physical body and that it can provide only temporary bodily pleasures, even though they are
enjoyable.
§ The gandhabba is the more long-lasting entity; a human bhava can last many hundreds to many
thousands of years; a physical body is a temporary shell used by the gandhabba for about 100
years.
§ The bodily pleasures that one experiences with this “physical shell” can last only part of that
maximum 100 years. As one gets old, those pleasures go away, and there is no way to keep
them the same.
§ On the other hand, the jhānic pleasures — or at least nirāmisa sukha — can be enjoyed even at
old age, as long as one keeps steps to maintain the brain in good condition. The gandhabba —
since it is trapped inside the physical body — needs the brain to in order to be mindful and to
cultivate good vacī and mano saṅkhāra; this is what is emphasized in the earlier posts in this
section, and analyzed in detail (for those who need to go deeper) in the Abhidhamma section.
14. Finally, it is important to emphasize the point that it will take a concerted effort to understand
these concepts fully. The more one reads, the more one will understand. It is not possible to gain
insight by reading a few posts. One has to spend time and read relevant posts in order to “fill in the
gaps”.
§ A simple introduction to the concept of gadhabbaya is given in this section: “Our Mental Body
– Gandhabba“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 355
o Micchā Diṭṭhi – Connection to Hethu Phala (Cause and Effect) (with Desana 6)
o Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda (with Desana 7)
o Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda II (with Desana 8)
1. The main reason for many people having various types of micchā diṭṭhi (or wrong views) can be
traced back to the fact that the workings of cause and effect involving living beings — and in
particular the mind of the sentient beings — is complex.
§ Science has been able to have much success in the material realm, simply because it is easier to
see how cause and effect work in the material realm.
2. In the discourse (desanā) below, we will talk about cause and effect (hethu-pala) in Buddha
Dhamma, and how conditions (paccaya) play a critical role in mental phenomena. The complex
relationship between causes and effects in relation to the mind is the reason why it is hard for many to
comprehend how and why kamma lead to kamma vipāka. As we discuss in the desanā:
§ Nothing in this world can come to existence without suitable causes AND conditions,
§ Rebirth process must be valid, in order to fully implement the principle of causality (cause and
effect).
3. The critical link between hethu-pala and paṭicca samuppāda is paṭṭhāna dhammā, which describe
the conditions under which causes (hethu) bring about effects or results (phala).
§ In the near future, I will start a new section on paṭṭhāna dhammā. It is a deep subject, but it can
be simplified to easily understand the relationship between hethu-pala and paṭicca samuppāda.
4. Here is the desanā (volume control on the right):
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 6 - Micchā Diṭṭhi Connection to Hethu Phala Cause and Effect
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 6 - Micchā Diṭṭhi Connection to Hethu Phala Cause and Effect
(Original - Larger file size
Related Posts
1. – Getting to Samādhi
– How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?
2. Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)
3. Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya
4. – Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka
– Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Thalaya (Mind Plane)
– Another post I forgot to mention in the desanā is on the question of “Where are those kamma seeds
stored?”. It is discussed in, “How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?“.
5. What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 357
In a previous desanā in this section, we discussed how suffering in this life is described in the
beginning of the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta. In this desanā, we will discuss how it is described by
Paṭicca Samuppāda.
“Suffering in This Life – According to Paṭicca Samuppada”
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 7 - Suffering in This Life According to Paṭicca Samuppāda
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 7 - Suffering in This Life According to Paṭicca Samuppāda
(Original - Larger file size
December 7, 2016
1. In the previous desanā, “Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda“, we discussed one
application of Paṭicca Samuppāda (PS).
§ Here, we will continue that discussion to gain more insights and discuss the importance in
controlling vacī saṅkhāra during Satipaṭṭhāna and Ānāpānasati bhāvanā.
2. I have posted three new essays in other sections at the website since that time.
§ Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra
§ Asevana and Annamanna Paccaya
§ Sutta Learning Sequence for the Present Day
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 8 - Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda II
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 8 - Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda II (Original -
Larger file size
Links mentioned in the desanā:
1. Posts in the “Paṭicca Samuppāda” section can be consulted for details on Paṭicca Samuppāda
cycles.
2. Time evolution of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala):
Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Saṅkhata (Sankata in Sinhala)
§ Difference between and Vaya (destruction of saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) that has arisen) and
Nirodha (stopping of the arising of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)).
Nirodha and Vaya – Two Different Concepts
3. How “random thoughts” come to our minds:
Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial
What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis
4. Two types of vedanā:
§ Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways
September 2, 2017
1. I saw the above question raised in a discussion forum recently (with a different title). The
questioner stated: “Eliminating sensual desire as a lay follower doesn’t seem possible, or reasonable,
especially if one plans on being in a relationship, or having motivation at work. .”.
§ I think this is a very important question. Most people have not understood the fact that the
Noble Path of the Buddha MUST BE followed sequentially.
§ Getting rid of sense desires (including sex, craving for food, etc) is not necessary in the
beginning and even up to the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Getting to the final stage of Nibbāna (Arahanthood) is a step-by-step process.
2. The necessary INITIAL steps involved are:
(i). Be a moral person and avoid the mundane five precepts (abstain from killing, stealing, sexual
misconduct, outright lying, and getting intoxicated) and also gossiping, slandering, and harsh
speech; see, “2. The Basics in Meditation“.
(ii). Understand the correct “wider world view” of the Buddha, and get rid of the ten types of
micchā diṭṭhi; see, “Mahā Cattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
(iii). Learn about the “deeper world view of the Buddha” stated by Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha,
anatta nature); see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“.
3. When one starts to understand the “anicca nature” (anicca means much more than just
impermanence) of this world, one becomes a Sotāpanna Anugāmi. When that “correct vision” about
“this wider world of 31 realms” sinks into the mind permanently, one becomes a Sotāpanna.
§ One does not need to even think about removing desire for sex or any other sense pleasure
until one gets to the Sotāpanna stage. This is a key point that most people do not understand.
4. Therefore, many people waste precious time by either first trying to suppress sense desires, and
even in some cases try to eliminate the innate sense of “me” or “a self”.
§ But just like one cannot learn algebra or advanced calculus without learning how to do addition,
those people will not make any significant progress. It is impossible to do so.
§ Furthermore, while one may get a temporary relief from “stresses of day-to-day activities” by
doing things like breath meditation, that will not provide the long-term release from suffering
that the Buddha explained.
§ Until one begins to understand Tilakkhaṇa, one will never get to the Sotāpanna stage.
5. Even during the time of the Buddha, there were many lay followers who attained the Sotāpanna
stage, and continued to engage in sense pleasures too. They were married and had regular jobs. There
was no need to avoid sense pleasures, including sex, at all.
§ For example, Vishākā (or Visākā), who was the leading female lay disciple at the time, attained
the Sotāpanna stage at age seven and went on to get married and have twenty plus children.
§ Many others were regular lay people with families who attained the Sotāpanna stage and
continued to live that way.
§ Of course, those who desired to attain higher stages of Nibbāna, made an effort to get rid of the
craving for sense pleasures. Most of them became bhikkhus who abstain from sex and other
sense pleasures.
6. One needs to completely abstain from sense pleasures entirely only to become an Anāgāmī. Even a
Sakadāgāmī still enjoys sense pleasures, even though he/she would not have the desire to “own”
things that provide sense pleasures.
§ For example, a Sakadāgāmī would still enjoy some sense pleasures,, but there would be no
desire to own “things that provide sense pleasure” (houses, cars, etc.).
7. Furthermore, one CANNOT just give up sense pleasures by sheer will power and become an
Anāgāmī. One has to comprehend the “anicca nature” at a higher level than a Sotāpanna, and then
those desires will NATURALLY go away.
§ That may hard for most people to understand: how the desire for sense pleasures will naturally
go away. That is precisely why one should follow the Path SEQUENTIALLY, one step at a
time.
§ By the way, the sense of “me” or ” a self” will go away only at the Arahant stage!
8. However, it is important also to realize that one cannot become a Sotāpanna by enjoying sense
pleasures to the full, i.e., by maintaining a “playboy type” lifestyle.
§ When one starts comprehending the anicca nature, one’s life WILL become simple.
§ Even before one gets to the Sotāpanna stage, one will start feeling nirāmisa sukha, which is due
to lessened stress on the mind due to this simple lifestyle.
9. Of course, one can speed up the process of the Sotāpanna stage by giving up sense pleasures.
Those who take this path become bhikkhus. They voluntarily give up most sense pleasures, including
sex.
§ If one is to attain jhāna, one must at least SUPPRESS all sense desires. For example, in
“WebLink: suttacentral: Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)“: “..So kho ahaṃ, ānanda, vivicceva kāmehi
vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
upasampajja viharāmi.”
§That means one needs to have all thoughts of sense pleasures and akusala kamma removed
from one’s mind at the time of getting to the jhāna.
§ That statement appears in every sutta describing jhāna.
10. According to the “wider world view” of the Buddha, there are 31 realms in this world. Suffering
in those realms decreases as one goes from the lowest four realms (apāyās) where the suffering
is intense, to the human realm (where there is both suffering and happiness). In deva realms
and 20 brahma realms, there is increasingly more happiness.
§ The peaceful feeling one experiences in a jhāna are the same sense experience of brahmas in
the corresponding realms. But getting to jhāna has nothing to do with getting to magga phala,
even though jhāna can provide a better mindset to do insight mediation.
§ None of those realms can provide permanent happiness, because lifetime in any realm is finite.
Even though the brahma realms have very long lifetimes, one would eventually die and can be
subsequently born in any of the 31 realms.
§ If one’s goal is permanent happiness, one must eventually get to the Arahant stage of Nibbāna.
However, if one can get to the Sotāpanna stage, one is guaranteed to get to the Arahant stage
within a relatively few subsequent births.
11. That is the main difference between Buddha Dhamma and other religions. Christianity and Islām
promise permanent happiness in deva realms and Hinduism promises lasting happiness in a brahma
realm.
§ But the Buddha taught that nothing in this world is permanent: That holds for living beings and
inert things in the whole universe.
§ Scientists (including Einstein) believed as recently as 100 years ago that the universe is in a
“steady state.” Now science has accepted that everything in our universe is in constant flux.
§ Therefore, one born in any realm will die from there and be reborn in another realm.
12. That is why the foremost goal of a Buddhist is to get to the Sotāpanna stage. When one first
realizes the anicca nature of this world, one can immediately see the dangers in doing the strongest of
dasa akusala. Those makes one eligible to be born in the four lowest realms (apāyās).
§ That understanding registers permanently in the mind of a Sotāpanna and is unbreakable. That
is why he/she will never be tempted to do any such immoral deed, no matter how tempting.
§ At that time, one will have unbreakable faith in Buddha, Dhamma, and Saṅgha. One can see at
that time how valuable Dhamma is. Of course, the Buddha discovered that Dhamma. It can be
conveyed accurately only by a a Noble Person.
§ That is the reason for “unbreakable faith,” or “aveccappasāda” (avecca pasāda) in Buddha,
Dhamma, and Saṅgha; see #4 of “Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna.”
§ One is also said to have “Ariyakānta sīla” or “unbreakable moral conduct” as a Sotāpanna.
That does not mean one will not do any of the dasa akusala. But one will never again do a dasa
akusala that would have strong kamma vipāka bringing rebirth in the apāyās. Such a mindset
permanently removed.
13. A Sotāpanna would then get to the Sakadāgāmī and Anāgāmī stages by getting rid of the desire
for sense pleasures in two phases.
§ Avijjā, or the ignorance of the Four Noble Truths, is totally removed only at the Arahant stage.
That is the time when one removes the “sense of me” or the “sense of a self.”
§ It is a systematic long precess.
§ As I said at the beginning, one cannot expect to do advanced mathematics unless one first
knows how to add/subtract, then how to do algebra, etc.
§ Thus, moral conduct and getting rid of the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi are REQUIREMENTS for
any stage of magga phala. Getting rid of the cravings for sense pleasures comes after that.
14. Finally, one may think that all one needs to do to get to the Sotāpanna stage because then one
would be free from the apāyās. That is true. However, when one gets to the Sotāpanna stage, one will
start seeing the sufferings in the kāma loka, including the deva realms.
As stated in the WebLink: suttacentral: Dhammika sutta (Snp 2.14):
§ Abrahmacariyaṃ parivajjayeyya,
Aṅgārakāsuṃ jalitaṃva viññū;
Asambhuṇanto pana brahmacariyaṃ,
Parassa dāraṃ na atikkameyya.
Translated:
§ A wise person would live a celibate life (avoiding sex), as one would avoid falling to a pit of
But if one cannot abstain from sense pleasures, one should at least not have affairs with
fire.
others’ spouses.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 363
1. These days, it is customary to state that the Noble Eightfold Path consists of three steps: sīla
(moral conduct), samādhi (Concentration), and paññā (wisdom). However, that sequence holds only
for the mundane Eightfold Path. It does not lead to Nibbāna, but only sets up the conditions to get
into the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ In this initial stage, one cultivates sīla by living a moral life by making a determined effort
not to violate the five precepts; see, “2. The Basics in Meditation“.
§ Samādhi is much more than just concentration; see, “What is samādhi? – Three Kinds of
Mindfulness”. When one lives a moral life, one’s mindset will gradually change to a calm state
(“sama” + “adhi“) as explained in that post.
§ With this calm mindset, one will be able to get rid of the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi (“Miccā
Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“. Then one reaches mundane Sammā Diṭṭhi or the
first level of wisdom.
2. One must first follow the mundane Path before one can understand anicca, dukkha, anatta, and get
into the Noble Path; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and “What is Unique in Buddha
Dhamma?“. Thus, there are three necessary steps to Nibbāna:
§ Follow the mundane Eightfold Path by living a moral life (sīla) to remove the ten types of
micchā diṭṭhi. Those include not believing in kamma vipāka, rebirth, etc. Then one get to
mundane samādhi, and gain the first level of wisdom (paññā): sīla, samādhi, paññā.
§ Then start removing a DEEPER layer of micchā diṭṭhi (that this world can offer lasting
happiness) by learning the CORRECT versions of anicca, dukkha,anatta (Tilakkhaṇa).
§ Once one grasps the basics of Tilakkhaṇa one becomes a Sotāpanna Anugāmi. One then starts
living with this an unbreakable sīla to attain Sammā samādhi and the four stages of Nibbāna
by following paññā, sīla, samādhi.
3. The first level of wisdom, achieved in the mundane path, is called kammassakatā Sammā diṭṭhi:
understanding that one’s actions, speech, and thoughts (kāya, vacī, and mano saṅkhāra) — one’s
kamma — WILL have consequences in the future, both in this life and in future lives.
§ With kammassakatā sammā diṭṭhi, one understands and accepts the fact that what we
experience (kamma vipāka, good and bad) are due to our past kamma.
§ One understands that in order to encounter good kamma vipāka in the future (including future
lives), one needs to cultivate GOOD kamma (i.e., good mano , vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra).
§ Even more importantly, one starts avoiding strong BAD kamma. Thus one starts getting rid of
the coarse levels of lobha, dosa, moha, which is the same as preventing dasa akusala).
§ When one follows this “sīla step,” one will start experiencing the early stages of Nibbāna of
“cooling down”; see, “Nirāmisa Sukha” and “How to Taste Nibbāna.”
4. Some people think that if one kills animals without knowing that will have consequences, that will
not lead to kamma vipāka. That is not correct.
§ There is no superhuman being that keeps track of what one is doing. But when one
intentionally kills an animal, one’s mind knows that, and one’s viññāṇa will adjust
accordingly. See, “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means.”
§ The more one kills animals that viññāṇa capable of killing will only grow. That will lead to a
corresponding bhava in the niraya realm (hell) where similar suffering exists.
§ Therefore, being ignorant of nature’s laws is not an excuse, just like when one gets caught
doing an illegal act, one will not be excused for not knowing that it was an unlawful act.
§ There is another type of action, where one kills animals unintentionally. For example, we kill
many insects every time we take a walk. That does not lead to any kamma vipāka.
§ So, only those saṅkhāra (or more correctly abhisaṅkhāra) done with intention lead to viññāṇa
(via “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”), and subsequently lead to births in different realms via
“viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa,” etc to …“bhava paccayā jāti.”
5. Most people also think that kamma are only bodily actions done via kāya saṅkhāra. But bodily
actions, speech, and thoughts all contribute to kamma. It is the cetanā (intention) involved in
thoughts, speech, and actions (i.e., mano , vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra), that is kamma. That is explained
in the subsection, “Living Dhamma – Fundamentals.”
§ When one starts comprehending how laws of kamma work (that causes lead to similar effects IF
suitable conditions are present), one will gradually get to mundane sammā samādhi. Then one’s
ability to grasp more profound Dhamma concepts (paññā) will grow; see, “Mundane Sammā
Samādhi.”
§ Future suffering can only be stopped by stopping the corresponding abhisaṅkhāra, i.e.,
“saṅkhāra nirodho bhava (and jāti) nirodho.”
§ But saṅkhāra can be only stopped by removing avijjā since saṅkhāra are unavoidable as long
as avijjā is there: “avijjā paccayā sankhārā.” That is why Sammā Diṭṭhi (understanding
Tilakkhaṇa) is so important.
§ One will have a good idea of how births in different realms are associated with different types
of suffering. Furthermore, one would be able to see how one’s actions (saṅkhāra) lead to such
births. I have summarized them in the table below.
Generation/Stopping
Realm(s) Level of Suffering Causes
of Saṅkhāra
: Killing
Dosa
Niraya (Hell) Incessant suffering (especially humans),
torture, rapes, etc
Excess greed (may I
Peta (Hungry Ghosts) Starvation get all, not others)
Vinipatha Asura Spend time aimlessly; Moha : Tina middha,
(‘demons’, titans, evil mostly heavy bodies not vicikicchā (lazy,
ghosts) movable lacking wisdom).
Animal (Tirisan: “tiri”
+ “san” or with all 3 Combinations
three types
of above Combinations of lobha,
dosa, moha
causes)
Human (Manussa: Almost all saṅkhāra
“mana” + “ussa” or In between lower and In between lower and responsible births in
with advanced mind) higher realms higher realms all realms occur here.
Mostly no physical Good kamma vipāka
Deva (similar to human suffering and abundant (done with alobha,
bodies, but much less sense pleasures (kāma). adosa, amoha). Mental
dense) But there is mental stress arises due to
stress. kāma rāga.
Rupavacara Brahma
Mental stress is much Suppression of kāma
(only manomaya kāya; reduced. Mainly jhānic rāga and cultivation of
cannot be even seen pleasures.
dukha
Viparinama rupavacara jhāna (while
when close
with a microscope) death. in the human realm)
Generation/Stopping
Realm(s) Level of Suffering Causes
of Saṅkhāra
Arupavacara Brahma
Only arupavacara Cultivation of
(only hadaya vatthu and jhānic pleasures.
Viparinama dukha
arupavacara jhāna
(while in the human
mind) when close death. realm)
Mostly attained in the
Elimination of all human realm, but
Nibbāna
Permanent release from causes for existence,
i.e., rāgakkhaya, possible in higher
all suffering. dosakkhaya, realms, especially
after the Sotāpanna
mohakkhaya. stage.
6. Now it is clear how future suffering arises via one’s own actions, speech, and thoughts (saṅkhāra).
It is also clear that suffering decreases and “nirāmisa sukha” grows at successively higher realms.
§ When one lives a sinful life and engaging in dasa akusala like killing, raping, etc. one is likely
to be reborn in the lowest four realms (apāyas) and to face much suffering. engages in extreme.
Such actions involve kāya, vacī, and mano saṅkhāra with lobha, dosa, moha.
§ One is likely to be born in rūpa or arūpa Brahma loka when one cultivates jhānas by even
abandoning kāma rāga (at least temporarily).
§ When one has reduced lobha, dosa, moha to rāga, paṭigha, avijjā (see, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha
versus Rāga, Patigha, Avijjā“) by following the mundane eightfold path, one is likely to be
reborn in the human or deva realms. In these realms ,suffering is much less, and especially in
the deva realms, most remaining suffering is mental.
7. However, there is suffering that we tend to ignore. They are saṅkhāra dukha and viparināma
dukha; see, “Introduction – What is Suffering?” and the follow-up post.
§ That suffering arises due to kāma rāga, i.e., craving (upādāna) for sense pleasures. Thus even if
one is not engaged in dasa akusala, one would not be released from kāma loka as long as one
has kāma rāga.
§ At the next higher level in the rūpa and arūpa realms, kāma rāga is absent, and thus one enjoys
jhānic pleasures.
§ Unlike sense pleasures, jhānic pleasures can be sustained for longer times, and are of much-
refined nature. However, that is still not permanent as the Nibbānic bliss arrived at by
eliminating all suffering.
8. As humans, we can overcome suffering in the kāma loka during this life itself, by cultivating
jhānas. That essentially means being able to “temporarily live” in rupavacara or arupāvacara realms.
§ That is done via either REMOVAL or SUPPRESSION of kāma rāga and paṭigha. Of course
this is not possible if one is engaging in dasa akusala.
§ There are Buddhist and non-Buddhist meditation techniques to achieve this. We will discuss
this in detail in an upcoming series on jhāna.
§ If one develops jhānas, one will be born in rūpa or arūpa realms in the next birth. However, as
we can see from the above table, any future births in those rūpa and arūpa realms are
temporary. One could later be reborn in the apāyas.
§ The only permanent solution to end all future suffering is to attain Nibbāna, as shown in the
above table.
9. When one gets to mundane sammā samādhi by cultivating sīla, one will be able to see the truth of
the overall picture shown in the table above. It is at this stage – with this broader world picture —
one can take the second important step towards Nibbāna by comprehending the Tilakkhaṇa.
However, one needs to know the correct versions of Tilakkhaṇa; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
§ That is the paññā (wisdom) associated with the first path factor (Sammā Diṭṭhi) in the Noble
Eightfold Path.
§ It is then one will be able to comprehend the First Noble Truth about the suffering in this world,
the Dukkha Sacca.
10. The key message of the Buddha is that one cannot find permanent happiness anywhere in this
world. Any such temporary happiness would be miniscule compared to suffering in the apāyas, and
kāma loka. That is very hard to be comprehend (no matter how well educated one maybe).
§ This fundamental fact of nature is called anicca nature. It means that NOTHING in this world
can bring a permanent state of happiness (and WILL only bring suffering). The only permanent
state of happiness is Nibbāna.
§ When one has the opposite perception of nicca, and focuses on seeking a long-term happiness
in this world, one WILL face suffering (dukha) in the long run.
§ Thus, eventually one will become helpless in this rebirth process and that is called anatta
nature.
§ Those are the Three Characteristics of nature. Therefore, the crucial second key step towards
Nibbāna (permanent happiness) is to learn these critical characteristics of Nature from a
true disciple of the Buddha.
11. When one starts comprehending the Tilakkhaṇa to some extent, one becomes a Sotāpanna
Anugāmi and enters the Noble Path; see, “Sotāpanna Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna.”
§ In this third and last step towards Nibbāna, one starts with a NEW mindset about the real nature
of this world. One can see that unimaginable suffering in the future if one does immoral things
in seeking sense pleasures.
§ Thus one starts to understand the First Noble Truth or the Dukkha Sacca: That there is
unimaginable suffering in this world of 31 realms. At this initial stage, it is hard to see the
dangers/suffering in the human and deva realms. But if one has comprehended the fact that
apāyas (four lower realms) must exist in order for the laws of kamma to work, then one can see
the unimaginable suffering in the apāyas.
§ The Buddha said that when one understands the First Noble Truth, one will
simultaneously understand the other three Noble Truths. One will be able to see that lobha,
dosa, moha are the origins of that suffering (Samudaya Sacca), that one needs to remove those
causes (Nirodha Sacca). And, the way to accomplish that is to follow the Noble Eightfold Path
(Magga Sacca).
12. This understanding becomes permanent forever (through future lives) when one attains the
Sotāpanna stage. From that point onward, one will not be CAPABLE of doing a kamma that could
make one eligible for rebirth in the apāyas. Thus, one will be free from the worst suffering in the
future.
§ The post, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids apāyagami Citta,” explains how Nature
enforces laws of kamma.
§ One’s mind will automatically reject any apāyagami act even on a sudden impulse.
13. Understanding Paṭicca Samuppāda is critical. It explains how future bhava (existences) arise
due to the way one thinks, speaks, and acts (with vacī and kāya saṅkhāra). See, “Saṅkhāra – What It
Really Means” and “Correct Meaning of Vacī Sankhāra.”
§ If one is capable of hurting and killing others, then one will be subjected to similar conditions
in the niraya.
§ If one has excessive greed where one is willing to hurt others to get pleasures, then one could
be born a peta (hungry ghost).
§ Those who are lazy and depends on others cultivate asura saṅkhāra. That leads to asura
viññāṇa and thus gives rise to an asura existence.
§ And if one is capable of thinking, speaking, and acting like an animal, one is then cultivating
animal saṅkhāra. Thus one could be born in an animal existence.
14. At this stage, one starts living by the ariyakānta sīla. This sīla is different from the sīla in the first
step.
§ In the first type of sīla, one forcefully avoided doing pāpa kamma or immoral acts. But there
could have been occasions where one “could not help breaking the sīla,” because the
temptations were too strong.
§ However, this new ariyakānta sīla is unbreakable, no matter how intense the temptation is.
One’s mind has grasped the fact that it is NOT WORTH to commit apāyagami actions. That is
regardless of how much wealth or pleasures they could bring.
§ For example, is it not worthwhile to make a lot of money by killing animals or fish, selling
drugs that can harm others, by lying, bribing, etc.
§ At this stage, one could still be attached to sense pleasures. Thus one could live a normal
married life, which is “moral living.”
15. It is not necessary to attain any jhāna to get to the Sotāpanna stage. These days there is too much
emphasis on jhāna.
§ One needs to realize that rūpāvacara and arūpāvacara jhāna are the sensory experiences of
the beings in the rūpa and arūpa realms. Therefore, such experiences still belong to “this
world” of 31 realms.
§ The Buddha stated that any of his lay disciples with the Sotāpanna stage is million times well-
off than a yogi who had attained all jhānas and all abhiññā powers.
§ While those jhānas and abhiññā powers last only during this life, a Sotāpanna is freed from the
apāyas FOREVER.
§ However, understanding jhānas is important since it confirms the wider world view of the
Buddha in the above table. There are many in the world today who have experienced jhānas.
§ But some people mistakenly believe that jhānas are necessary to attain magga phala. But as the
above table shows, jhānas are still part of “this world” and can be attained even by following
“non-Buddhist meditations.” More details at “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala.”
4.6.3 Six Root Causes – Loka Samudaya (Arising of Suffering) and Loka
Nirodhaya (Nibbāna)
1. “Loka Samudaya” (“san” “udaya“) means “arising of this suffering filled world”; “loka
nirodhaya” (“nir” “udaya“) means “stopping the arising of this world”. By “this world” it is meant
the 31 realms.
§ As long as there are causes (hetu) exist for the world to arise for a given living being, that
living being will be reborn and subjected much more suffering in the apāyās than any
temporary happiness experienced in the “good realms” at or above the human realm.
§ When three of those causes (lobha, dosa, moha) are removed, one will be released from “this
world” and one would be free of suffering and would have attained Nibbāna.
2. There are 4 paramatta dhammā or “ultimate realities”: citta, cetasika, rūpa, and Nibbāna. Only the
first three belong to this world of 31 realms.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
368 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ When one is in “this world”, his/her experience is described by citta, cetasika, rūpa.
§ When one attains Nibbāna, one would be totally dissociated from citta, cetasika, rūpa.
§ That is another way to describe Nibbāna.
3. There are 6 root causes (mūlika hetu) that lead to the arising of one’s world: lobha (greed),
dosa hate/anger), moha (acting with 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi) and alobha (non-greed), adosa (non-
hate/anger), amoha (absence of moha).
§ When one acts with one or more of lobha, dosa, moha, one is giving rise to kamma beeja
(kammic energy) that can lead to rebirth in the four “bad realms” or the apāyās. In other
words, one is generating bad abhisaṅkhāra or “apuñña abhisaṅkhāra“, therefore, “bad
viññāṇa” etc, which lead to “bad bhava” and “bad jāti” (see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda“).
§ In the same way, when one acts with one or more of alobha, adosa, amoha, one is giving rise to
kamma beeja that can lead to rebirth in the “good realms” at or above the human realm. In other
words, one is generating good abhisaṅkhāra or “puñña abhisaṅkhāra“, therefore, “good
viññāṇa” etc, which lead to “good bhava” and “good jāti“.
§ However, those three “good root causes” cannot lead to rebirths in the “good realms” after the
three “bad root causes” are completely removed; see below.
4. It is said that lobha, dosa, moha are food (āhāra) for the apāyās; that is why they are called kilesa
or “impurities”. That means they are food for the kamma beeja that give rise to births in the apāyās.
§ In the same way, alobha is food or āhāra for the deva realms.
§ Alobha and adosa are āhāra for the brahma realms.
§ However, amoha is not a cetasika (mental factor), and instead what one cultivates is paññā
cetasika. One attains Nibbāna by cultivating paññā. We will discuss this below.
5. Therefore, all six root causes lead to the continuation of the rebirth process. However, one needs to
work to stop only the three “bad root causes” in order to stop the rebirth process (“rāgakkhayo
Nibbānaṃ, dosakkhayo Nibbānaṃ, mohakkhayo Nibbānaṃ”).
§ The Path to Nibbāna STARTS with the reducing of the 3 bad roots and cultivating the 3
good root roots.
§ In order to attain Nibbāna, one MUST be in a good realm. Therefore, the first objective is to
avoid births in the apāyās. The 3 bad roots (lobha, dosa, moha) are also called kilesa (or keles
or impure), because they can lead to rebirths in the apāyās.
6. Furthermore, one’s paññā (wisdom) grows as one gets rid of the 3 bad roots and cultivate the 3
good roots. That is essential to be able to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa.
§ When one comprehends Tilakkhaṇa, one will lose the desire to be reborn in the “good realms”
too.
§ When one’s paññā becomes optimum at the Arahant stage, one will not go through the
“upādāna paccayā bhava” step in Paṭicca Samuppāda leading to ANY rebirth.
§ This is why it is said that after completing the eighth step of Sammā Samādhi in the Noble
Eightfold Path, one get to Sammā Ñāṇa stage (when paññā is optimized) and one attains
Sammā Vimutti (complete release from this world), i.e., “dasa angehi samannāgato Arahant“.
7. Thoughts can arise in the mind with EITHER good roots OR the bad roots (as far as kammic
consequences are concerned).
§ All six roots are with a normal human as anusaya (hidden), but only one set can appear at a
given time.
§ This is why even the “worst person” can do kusala kamma sometimes.
8. It is to be noted that apuñña abhisaṅkhāra arise in the mind when doing dasa akusala (i.e., when
asobhana cetasika arise in citta). Puñña abhisaṅkhāra arise when doing dasa kusala, where sobhana
cetasika arise in citta; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.
§ Those immoral actions (dasa akusala) done with apuñña abhisaṅkhāra have the three “bad
roots” of lobha, dosa, and moha, and all those are asobhana cetasika (other types of asobhana
cetasika can arise too). It is to be noted that ALL apuñña abhisaṅkhāra are done with citta
contaminated by the moha cetasika; lobha and dosa cetasika are in some of those citta that
are associated with dasa akusala; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.
§ “Kusala” comes from “ku” “sala” or getting rid of immoral (“ku“). Kusala kamma are done
with the three “good roots” of alobha, adosa, and amoha. It is also to be noted that alobha
and adosa are in ALL kusala citta, but amoha is NOT EVEN a cetasika.
9. Therefore, one can do kusala kamma without getting rid of moha, i.e., without cultivating
paññā: most people engage in giving, have compassion for others, etc. This is a key point to
remember.
§ Anyone who has any of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi HAS NOT removed moha, and thus HAS
NOT started cultivating paññā. But such a person can still do some dasa kusala (like giving),
even though their javana power is not high compared to one who has removed the 10 types of
micchā diṭṭhi.
§ By the way, the javana power of kusala citta go up even more when one starts comprehending
Tilakkhaṇa. In the Abhidhamma language, javana power is high in “ñāṇa sampayutta citta“,
where ñāṇa is wisdom (paññā). And paññā grows with increasing comprehension of
Tilakkhaṇa.
10. Therefore, “kusala” has two levels: within the mundane eightfold path, one can do kusala kamma
“at a lower level”; these are also called “puñña kamma“; see, “Puñña Kamma – Dāna, Sīla,
Bhāvanā“. That will keep one away from births in the apāyās.
§ However, those kusala kamma are “contaminated” to some degree, and they become more
powerful in the Noble Path with the increasing comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa.
§ For example, in “mundane alobha“, one loses craving for some things and is willing to share
those with others. In “lokuttara alobha” one just loses craving by seeing the worthlessness of
things in this world.
§ In the same way, mundane adosa and amoha arise temporarily. But of course, they bring their
vipāka to make it easier to cultivate paññā and to get to lokuttara roots, i.e., comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa.
11. It is inevitable that even the most “moral normal person” WILL generate “bad abhisaṅkhāra”
either during this life or in the future life, until one REMOVES the three bad root causes from the
mind by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa. Until then they remain as anusaya, and come to the surface
under suitable conditions.
§ For example, X may see an enticing object and greed (lobha) may come to the mind.
§ But at another time, X may see a hungry person and may buy that person a meal with non-greed
(alobha), non-hate (adosa), and amoha.
§ An Arahant has removed all six root causes. But he/she may provide a meal to a hungry person
out of paññā (wisdom) — doing the appropriate thing; it is also called a kriya, an action
without kammic consequences.
12. When one removes lobha, dosa, moha from one’s mind, that will AUTOMATICALLY lead to
the removal of alobha, adosa, and amoha too, because one’s paññā has now been cultivated to see
the futility of all six causes to be born anywhere in the 31 realms.
§ This is a key idea to comprehend. As one progresses on the mundane eightfold path —
removing the three bad roots — one’s paññā will start to grow.
13. At that point, IF one gets to hear the essence of the Buddha Dhamma (Four Noble Truths/ Noble
Eightfold Path/ Tilakkhaṇa), then paññā will start to grow much faster, as all six root causes will fade
one’s mind.
§ The key is to comprehend the anicca nature of this world of 31 realms: Because of this anicca
nature, one will be subjected to dukkha, and thus one will become helpless (anatta)in this
rebirth process.
§ This is stated succinctly in the Dhammacappavattana Sutta in the following verse: “yampiccam
(yam pi iccam) nalabhati (na labhati) tampi dukkham” or “one suffers when one does not get
what one desires (iccā)”; see, “”Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ That is because even if one desires and gets a birth in a deva or a brahma realm, that lasts only
a finite time, and one will eventually be born in the apāyās and will endure much more and
unimaginably harsh suffering.
14. This fact of not getting what one desires (“na” “icca“, which rhymes as “anicca“, just as “na”
“āgāmi” rhymes as “Anāgāmi“) describes the key fundamental characteristic of “this world”. This
then leads to “dukkha” and thus to “anatta“, as expressed by the following verse in many suttas:
“yadaniccam tam dukkham, tam dukkham tadanattā” (“yad aniccam tam dukkham, tam dukkham tad
anattā“); see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ This is a special knowledge that is grasped only by a Buddha. Of course, once a Buddha
discovers this knowledge, he can explain it to others.
§ It is to be noted that even when a Buddha is not in this world, there could be yogis who have
removed the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. However, they would not have removed avijjā, until
comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
15. Therefore, until a Buddha or a true disciple of the Buddha explains the above “big picture”, AND
until one’s mind “sees” the truth of this picture, one will be trapped in the suffering-filled rebirth
process (samsāra).
§ This is because one will ALWAYS believe that by “just being moral” (i.e., acting with alobha,
adosa, amoha), one will be able to attain permanent happiness somewhere (in the heaven per
most religions or in a brahma realm per Hinduism).
§ Not believing in even the rebirth process and in the consequences of one’s actions (kamma), as
well as not believing in the paraloka of gandhabba, are included in the 10 types of micchā
diṭṭhi; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ When one has those 10 types micchā diṭṭhi, one is more likely to do apuñña abhisaṅkhāra
(when the sense input becomes irresistible) and “become eligible” for the birth in the apāyās.
16. However, it must be clear that one cannot get to Sammā Diṭṭhi (or the correct vision) in the Noble
Path (that leads to Nibbāna) merely by getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi.
§ The next and critical step is comprehending the deeper characteristics of Nature or Tilakkhaṇa
(anicca, dukkha, anatta), per above discussion.
§ This is why the Buddha described two types of Sammā Diṭṭhi and two types of eightfold paths;
see, “Mahā Chattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
§ By following the first type of eightfold path, one stays away from the apāyās, and ALSO
setup conditions to be able to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Once on the first eightfold path, one can learn the true Tilakkhaṇa from a Buddha or a true
disciple of the Buddha, contemplate on them, and start on the Noble Eightfold Path.
4.6.4 Ye Dhammā Hetuppabhavā.. and Yam Kiñci Samudaya Dhammam..
August 16, 2018
This post will analyze two famous key verses to show the inter-connections among the Four Noble
Truths, Tilakkhaṇa, Paṭicca Samuppāda, and the Noble Eightfold Path. These are the main concepts
that must be comprehended in order to benefit from Buddha Dhamma.
“Ye dhammā hetuppabhavā,
Tesaṃ hetuṃ tathāgato āha;
Tesañca yo nirodho,
Evaṃvādī mahāsamaṇo”
§ From just hearing this verse uttered by Ven. Assaji, Upatissa (later Ven. Sariputta) became a
Sotāpanna. This is the fundamental concept of Buddha Dhamma, and is explained in detail in
the Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ The correct translation is: “Whatever dhammā (which are really kamma beeja) that give rise to
the rebirth process, causes for those to arise have been declared by the Buddha; he has also
explained how those causes can be stopped from arising (and thus end the rebirth process)”.
§ First, let us briefly discuss how we arrive at this translation.
1. “Ye dhammā” means “those dhammā”. The complex word in the verse is hetuppabhavā: It is the
combination of “hetu“, “pa“, and “bhava“, which respectively mean causes, repeated, and existence.
The combination rhymes as hetuppabhavā, just as dhamma cakka pavattana rhymes as
“dhammacakkappavattana“.
§ So, hetuppabhavā means “causes leading to repeated birth or causes to sustain the rebirth
process”.
§ It is to be noted that both words hetuppabhavā and pabhassara have the words “pa” and “bha”
embedded in them; see, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
§ So, “ye dhammā hetuppabhavā” means “those dhammā that sustain the rebirth process or
sansāra“.
2. Tesam is “te” + “san” or three “san” of lobha, dosa, moha. These are those hetu or causes.
§ Even though there are six root causes, they all can be eliminated by eliminating those three; see,
“Six Root Causes – Loka Samudaya (Arising of Suffering) and Loka Nirodhaya (Nibbāna)“.
§ Of course “san” are the defilements that are responsible for the rebirth process for anyone,
which are basically dasa akusala; see, “San“.
§ So, “Tesaṃ hetuṃ tathāgato āha” means “The Buddha has declared what those three causes
are”.
3. The next part, “Tesañca yo nirodho” or “Te san ca yo nirodho” has the second complex key word
of nirodha, which comes from “nir”+”udaya”, where “nir” means stop and “udaya” means “arise”.
· Thus nirodha means stop something from arising; see, “Nirodha and Vaya – Two Different
Concepts“.
· The easiest way to understand nirodha is to see that a plant can be stopped from arising (i.e.,
coming into being), by destroying the seed. Put in the real context of the word nirodha, a
plant’s coming into being can be stopped by stopping the creation of that seed.
· In the same way, a future existence (bhava) can be stopped by stopping the formation of the
corresponding viññāṇa (kamma beeja), i.e., bhava nirodha is achieved by viññāṇa nirodha.
4. By going backward further in PS, viññāṇa nirodha in turn is done by (abhi)saṅkhāra nirodha; see
below too. Of course, abhisaṅkhāra nirodha cannot be done by sheer will power. One must cultivate
panna (wisdom) and get rid of avijjā. That requires comprehending of Tilakkhaṇa or the futility of
clinging to this suffering-filled world of 31 realms that will make one helpless in the end (especially
when born in the four lowest realms or apāyas).
§ We can thus see that viññāṇa nirodha leads to the stopping of initiation of akusala-mula
Paṭicca Samuppāda (PS) cycles starting at the “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step.
5. Now it is clear what is meant by “tesañca (te san ca) yo nirodho, evaṃvādī mahāsamaṇo”. The
Buddha (mahāsamaṇo) has explained how those defilements can be stopped from arising”.
§ Viññāṇa nirodha is achieved via stopping abhisaṅkhāra or — to put in a practical statement
— by abstaining from all dasa akusala. That involves the 3 akusala done by the body (via
kāya saṅkhāra), 4 akusala done by the speech and defiled conscious thoughts (via vacī
saṅkhāra), and 3 akusala done by the mind (via mano saṅkhāra).
§ It is really important to understand what is meant by key words like saṅkhāra and viññāṇa; see,
“Mental Aggregates“.
§ It is important to realize that conscious thoughts are also vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning
of Vacī Saṅkhāra“. It is not just immoral speech and deeds that matter, but immoral “day
dreaming” counts too.
6. The way to achieve viññāṇa nirodha is of course the Noble Eightfold Path. When one follows the
Noble Path, one’s avijjā will be removed and thus no more initiations of PS cycles, i.e., no more
suffering (there will not be “jāti paccayā jarā, marana, soka,..).
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Petakopadesa, this verse is used to express the four Noble Truths
(cattāri ariyasaccāni), and we can now see why.
7. The second related verse “yaṃ kiñci samudaya dhammaṃ sabbaṃ taṃ nirodha dhammaṃ“ is in
the WebLink: suttacentral: Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (SN 56.11).
§ Translated: “If there are dhammā that give rise to suffering (i.e., any samudaya dhammā), all
such dhammā can be stopped from arising (via the Noble Eightfold Path)”. [samudaya = san +
udaya = rise of san (that leads to suffering)]
§ “yaṃ kiñci samudaya dhammaṃ” means “any dhammā that eventually lead to suffering. And,
“sabbaṃ taṃ nirodha dhammaṃ” means “all such dhammā” are nirodha dhammā, i.e., they
can be stopped from arising.
8. But we need to get the idea embedded in this verse, instead of just translating the verse.
§ From what we have learned so far, we know that samudaya dhamma (or kamma beeja) are
created by viññāṇa, for which the best translation is “defiled consciousness“.
§ Viññāṇa in turn arise due to our own (abhi) saṅkhāra. And the reason that we do abhisaṅkhāra
is that we are ignorant of the anicca nature, i.e., we have avijjā.
§ That is what the paṭicca samuppāda states: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra, saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa, viññāṇa paccayā nāmarupa“, leading to “upādāna paccayā bhava, bhava paccayā
jāti“, which ends up in the whole mass of suffering: “jāti paccayā jarā, marana,…”
9. So, again we can see that samudaya dhamma arise with defiled viññāṇa that arise due to
abhisaṅkhāra done with avijjā!
§ If we do not cultivate such defiled viññāṇa via abhisaṅkhāra (i.e., if we stop doing dasa
akusala), then we will not end up with births that are destined to lead to all types of suffering:
jarā (old age), marana (death), soka (unhappiness), parideva (long lasting state of unhappiness
where soka keeps bubbling up), dukkha (physical injuries, diseases, etc), domanassa (long
bouts of depression), upāsāya (extreme distress where can faint or generates suicidal
thoughts)”.
§ Those sufferings described above are mainly for the human realm. If one is born in the four
lowest realms, it will be much worse, mostly physical suffering or dukkha.
In the above we have discussed how to stop the formation of kamma beeja. But what about those
kamma beeja that we have already piled up during this life and from previous lives? Will not they
bring vipāka and initiate new bhava and jāti filled with suffering?
10. The key is to understand that one gets a “second chance”. Kamma vipāka are not deterministic,
i.e., kamma beeja can not automatically bring vipāka.
§ In an uppatti (rebirth) PS cycle, we saw that kamma beeja are formed with the first two steps in
the PS cycle: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“. This viññāṇa is
called a kamma viññāṇa.
§ But when those kamma beeja try to bring back the vipāka corresponding to those kamma beeja
at a FUTURE time, they are brought back as vipāka viññāṇa. What this means is the mind is
exposed to a “sign” called a “nimitta” that corresponds to the kamma that was done to make
that kamma beeja.
11. So, it is important to realize that in an uppatti PS cycle, the “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarupa” step
starts much later, may be even in a future life.
12. This is best explained with an example. Suppose person X kills another human being in this life.
That involves a lot of mano, vacī, and kāya abhisaṅkhāra and all those contribute to a defiled mindset
(viññāṇa) that led to a kamma beeja which got the most contribution at the moment of killing via a
kāya abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Now, that kamma beeja will be there waiting to bring its vipāka at a future time.
§ Suppose X dies a few years later, but he has more kammic energy for this human bhava left. In
that case, that kamma beeja cannot bring vipāka. He will leave a dead body as a gandhabba and
wait for a suitable womb.
§ However, if X had killed one of his parents, for example, that would be an ānantariya kamma
and thus that kamma beeja will bring its vipāka at the end of this life.
13. In either case, the “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarupa” step will start the rest of PS cycle leading to a
new bhava (let us say in the niraya) with the following way.
§ So, X is now at deathbed, whether in this life or in a future life as a human. Just before the
dying moment, that kamma beeja will bring a sign (called nimitta) of that kamma to X’s mind.
it could be a scene from that killing event or a scene from the niraya that he is about to be born.
§ Since he had done this act with intention, that mindset will come back and he will basically
have that defiled mindset (viññāṇa) that was responsible for the killing. Then he will have that
nimitta come in and this is the “nāmarupa” that comes to his mind at that time: “viññāṇa
paccayā nāmarupa“.
14. All his six sense faculties will transform according to that sign or numitta: “nāmarupa paccayā
saḷāyatana“. Of course the nimitta will come through only one, let us say as a picture from that
killing event or a sound.
§ His mind will now make contact (saḷāyatana paccayā phassa) just as in any sense event, and
that leads to “phassa paccayā vedanā“, i.e., now he is about to re-enacting the crime in his
mind, starting at the “vedanā paccayā taṇhā” step.
15. But a critical point in these steps occurs at the “vedanā paccayā taṇhā”, “taṇhā paccayā
upādāna” steps. When one gets that nimitta of a birth in the niraya appears at the moment of death,
one WILL NOT grasp it if one has attained the Sotāpanna stage.
§ A Sotāpanna‘s mind has grasped the truth of the “anicca nature” and has a higher level of
panna (wisdom), so it WILL NOT grasp that nimitta. This is why Angulimala was able to attain
the Arahanthood, even after killing almost 1000 people: those past kamma beeja did not get to
germinate.
16. Therefore, that nimitta will be ineffective if X had become a Sotāpanna in the intervening time
and a different (good or bad) next in line will appear, and the process will continue until a suitable
new bhava is grasped at the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step.
§ This is how a Sotāpanna avoids “apāyagāmi kamma beeja” from bringing their vipāka.
§ Of course, if X had not attained the Sotāpanna stage, then he will be born in niraya.
17. Please do not hesitate to ask questions at the forum if this is not clear. Kamma viññāṇa are
discussed in detail at: “Kamma Viññāṇa – Link Between Mind and Matter”.
§ The process of how past kamma try to bring vipāka with vipāka viññāṇa is discussed in detail
at, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka Viññāṇa“.
§ Of course one needs to really understand what is meant by all these terms (vedanā, taṇhā,
upādāna, etc.) in order to understand these processes; see, “Mental Aggregates“.
§ If one can truly comprehend this post, one could get to the Sotāpanna stage, because this is
really seeing the “way to Nibbāna“, i.e., how to stop the future suffering permanently. This is
about getting to lokuttara Sammā Diṭṭhi.
October 12, 2017; revised April 28, 2018; September 13, 2018
1. Apparently, there are a considerable number of people who have attained magga phala (with or
without jhāna) recently all over the world. We are indebted to the late Waharaka Thero for this great
awakening by clarifying the correct interpretations of Buddha’s teachings; now many are working
tirelessly to make those interpretations available to others; see, “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
§ Over the years, I have seen some key issues related to jhāna and magga phala discussed at
many online forums, without reaching a definitive conclusion. I hope this series of posts will be
of use to settle this matter.
§ I will try to put together a consistent picture solely based on material from the Tipiṭaka. One
common problem that I see in online forums is that many people put Tipiṭaka on the same
footing as commentaries (such as Visuddhimagga) written much later by people (non-Ariyas)
like Buddhaghosa or Nagarjuna. That leads to confusion because those accounts have many
contradictions with the Tipiṭaka.
§ These posts are supposed to be read in the given sequence. Please read carefully at a quiet time.
2. Samādhi is essential to attain Magga phala. Jhāna are a special category samādhi, and are not
essential to attain magga phala.
§ Samādhi (“sama”+”adhi” where “sama” means “same” and “adhi” means “dominance”) means
turning the mind towards a certain goal or a state; see, “What is samādhi? – Three Kinds of
Mindfulness“.
§ There can be thousands of different types of samādhi. There can be micchā samādhi (turning
the mind towards immoral or unfruitful goals), as well as Sammā samādhi. For example, a
master thief concentrating on making a detailed plan of a robbery will get into a state of
samādhi when he is focusing on it intently.
3. What is essential to attain magga phala is Sammā Samādhi. As we have discussed before, there is
mundane sammā samādhi that is reached by getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. Then there is
lokuttara Sammā Samādhi that is reached by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa to some extent; see,
“Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ As discussed in the previous post, “Sīla, Samādhi, Paññā to Paññā, Sīla, Samādhi“, one gets to
mundane Sammā Samādhi via “Sīla, Samādhi, Paññā“. Then one can comprehend the
Tilakkhaṇa and follow the Noble Path via ” Paññā, Sīla, Samādhi“, with Sammā Diṭṭhi taking
the lead.
§ There is nowhere in the Tipiṭaka that says one needs jhāna to attain magga phala or Nibbāna.
§ Magga phala means one is starting to break the bonds (dasa samyojana) to this world; see,
“Dasa Samyojana – Bonds in Rebirth Process“. One attains magga phala by getting into
lokuttara Sammā Samādhi (samādhi to remove “san“: “san” + “mā“; see, “What is “San”?
Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
4. April 28, 2018: I found a desanā by Waharaka Thero where he present clear evidence that jhāna
are not necessary to attain magga phala (It is of course in Sinhala language):
WebLink: Download “Are Jhāna Required for Magga-Phala”
§ The main point the Thero makes is that we know that there are jāti Sotāpannas born in the
human realm. But if a jhāna was REQUIRED to attain the Sotāpanna stage, then that person
WOULD NOT be born in the human realm, but in a brahma realm corresponding that jhāna.
5. In simple terms, jhāna are mental states existing in the 16 rūpa realms and the 4 arūpa realms.
Thus by definition, attaining jhāna has nothing to do with Nibbāna. This can be easily seen in “The
89 (121) Types of Citta“.
Jhāna fall into two categories (Ariya and anariya) and — depending on the category — could be an
asset or hindrance, as we will discuss in this section.
§ As discussed in “31 Realms Associated with the Earth” those 20 realms lie above the realms of
kāma loka. Those rūpi and arūpi brahmas enjoy only jhānic pleasures, which are better than
sensual pleasures.
§ We all have been born in most of the 31 realms (except for the realms reserved for the
Anāgāmis) an uncountable times, and thus had attained those jhānic states uncountable
times in previous lives.
§ As we know, sensual pleasures are present only in kāma loka (human realm, six deva realms,
and the animal realm).
§ Humans can cultivate jhāna by suppressing (anariya) or removing (Ariya) the craving for
sensual pleasures (kāma rāga).
§ One could approach Nibbāna via Ariya or anariya jhāna; see, “Ascendance to Nibbāna via
Jhāna (Dhyāna)“.
6. If those brahmas are born there by cultivating mundane jhāna, then kāma rāga remain with them
as anusaya (which means deeply hidden). So, when they die and are reborn in the lower realms, those
kāma rāga re-surface. The suppression is only during the time they live as brahmas in those higher
realms.
§ In the same way, those humans who get into jhānas SUPPRESSING kāma rāga can lose the
ability to get into jhānas even in this life. The best example from the Tipiṭaka is Devadatta,
who developed not only anāriya (mundane) jhānas but also abhiññā powers, and then lost all
that and ended up in an apāya. Even though Devadatta was obviously exposed to correct
Tilakkhaṇa (he was ordained by the Buddha himself), he had apparently not grasped them.
§ The ability to get into jhāna is also related to our gati (pronounced “gathi”; our habits from past
lives). Those who have cultivated mundane jhānas in relatively recent past lives can easily get
into mundane jhāna.
§ However, if one gets into veven the first Ariya (supramundane) jhāna, one has essentially
attained the Anāgāmī stage by removing kāma rāga; see, “Mundane versus Supramundane
Jhāna”.
7. Magga phala (including the Arahant stage) can be reached via going through any of the
jhānic states or without going through any jhānic state; see, “The 89 (121) Types of Citta“.
§ This is also discussed in “WebLink: suttacentral: Paññāvimutta Sutta (AN 9.44)” and
“WebLink: suttacentral: Susimaparibbājaka Sutta (SN 12.70)“.
§ Furthermore, a Sotāpanna may attain anariya jhāna and be born in brahma realms lying
below the Suddhāvāsa realms reserved for the Anāgāmis. But they also do not come back to
kāma loka; see, “Pathama Metta Sutta“. Of course, those who attain anariya jhāna without
magga phala, will come back to kāma loka and could be born in the apāyās subsequently.
8. More detailed information with references to suttās at, “Ascendance to Nibbāna via Jhāna
(dhyāna)” , “Mundane versus Supramundane Jhāna” , “Nirodha Samāpatti, Phala Samāpatti, Jhāna,
and Jhāna Samāpatti”.
§ There are a series of posts on jhāna (in simpler terms, without too many Pali words) in an older
section: “Power of the Human Mind“.
4.7.2 Vitakka, Vicāra, Savitakka, Savicāra, and Avitakka, Avicāra
March 7, 2019
1. It is critically important to understand the meanings of vitakka, vicāra, savitakka, savicāra, and
avitakka, avicāra. I see many discussions on discussion forums without reaching a satisfactory
conclusion, and most sutta translations are incorrect. In particular, savitakka and savicāra are
commonly translated incorrectly as “with vitakka and vicāra”.
§ As always, one MUST start with the basics. Trying to extract the meanings of such key words
from deep suttas is counter-productive.
§ What we need to do is to start with the basic definitions and THEN verify that the meanings of
verses in deeper suttas CAN BE figured out using these basic definitions. I have seen that this
method ALWAYS works within the Tipiṭaka.
§ In fact, if someone can point out a sutta in the Tipiṭaka that is not consistent with this post,
please comment at the discussion forum.
§ Possible inconsistencies MAY arise if one tries to make them compatible with late
commentaries like the Visuddhimagga.
2. The words takka, vitakka, vicāra (තර්ක, විතර්ක, විචාර in Sinhala; the closest English words could
be “think one way”, further/counter analysis, investigate in depth) are associated with vacī saṅkhāra;
all these are associated with conscious thinking about a thought object (ārammaṇa). One either
silently “talks to oneself” or speaks out while analyzing the situation in the mind. [takka :[m.]
thought; reasoning; logic. (nt.), butter-milk. vitakka :[m.] reflection; thought. vicāra :[m.]
investigation; management; planning; discursive thinking.]
A clear explanation is given in Abhidhamma, in the discussion on kāma dhātu, byāpāda dhātu,
vihiṃsā dhātu, nekkhamma dhātu, abyāpāda dhātu, avihiṃsā dhātu, in the following section:
“WebLink: suttacentral: Dhātuvibhaṅga“.
§ For example, “Tattha katamā kāmadhātu? Kāmapaṭisaṃyutto takko vitakko saṅkappo appanā
byappanā cetaso abhiniropanā micchāsaṅkappo—ayaṃ vuccati kāmadhātu”.
Translated: “What is the element of kāma (indulgence)? takka, vitakka, saṅkappa, appanā,
byappanā (remaining there, which is related to vicāra), which lead to establishing wrong views.
This is called the element of desire/indulgence”.
In other words, when one is constantly generating such thoughts, kāma rāga build up.
3. The opposite, element of nekkhamma is defined as: “Tattha katamā nekkhammadhātu?
Nekkhammapaṭisaṃyutto takko vitakko, saṅkappa, … pe … sammā saṅkappo—ayaṃ vuccati
“nekkhamma dhātu”.
§ Translated: “what is the element of renunciation? takka, vitakka, saṅkappa, appanā,
byappanā (remaining there, which is related to vicāra), which lead to establishing correct
views (leading to removal of defilements) . This is called the element of renunciation”.
In other words, when one is constantly generating such thoughts, kāma rāga is diminished.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
378 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Similarly, byāpāda dhātu, vihiṃsā dhātu, and the opposites abyāpāda dhātu, avihiṃsā dhātu
are defined.
4. We can now see what is meant by kāma (abhijjhā) saṅkappa, byāpāda (or vyāpāda) saṅkappa,
vihiṃsā saṅkappa, which are all “bad” vacī saṅkhāra. They are closely associated with greed, hate,
and ignorance.
§ Their opposites are associated with Sammā Saṅkappa: nekkhamma, abyāpāda, and avihiṃsā
saṅkappa.
5. Now we can also see the connection to vacī saṅkhāra as defined clearly in the “WebLink:
suttacentral: Cūḷavedalla Sutta (MN 44)“: “.. vitakka vicārā vacī saṅkhāro” OR “vacī saṅkhāra are
vitakka vicārā”.
§ Vacī saṅkhāra are “conscious thoughts that we silently generate” and also those thoughts that
lead to speech by moving the lips, tongue etc. Hate speech is due to apuññābhi vacī saṅkhāra.
Thinking about a Dhamma concept is a puññābhi vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning of
Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
6. Another important sutta where this is discussed is, “WebLink: suttacentral: Mahācattārīsaka Sutta
(MN 117)“:
“Katamo ca, bhikkhave, sammāsaṅkappo ariyo anāsavo lokuttaro maggaṅgo? Yo kho, bhikkhave,
ariyacittassa anāsavacittassa ariyamaggasamaṅgino ariyamaggaṃ bhāvayato takko vitakko
saṅkappo appanā byappanā cetaso abhiniropanā vacīsaṅkhāro—ayaṃ, bhikkhave, sammāsaṅkappo
ariyo anāsavo lokuttaro maggaṅgo..”
§ Translated: ““And what, bhikkhus, is Sammā Saṅkappa that is Noble, without āsava,
supramundane, a factor of the Noble Path? Those are Noble thoughts (ariyacittassa) that are
devoid of cravings (anāsavacittassa), belong to the Noble Path (ariyamaggasamaṅgino
ariyamaggaṃ bhāvayato) with takko vitakko saṅkappo appanā byappanā cetaso
abhiniropanā vacī saṅkhāro: that is Sammā Saṅkappa that is Noble, a factor of the Noble
Path”.
7. Succinct explanations can also be found in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Vitakka Sutta (SN 56.7)“.
Here is the basic idea of the whole sutta:
§ “Bhikkhus, do not engage in evil unwholesome thoughts which are: sensual thoughts, thoughts
of ill will, thought of harming others (pāpake akusale vitakke vitakkeyyātha, seyyathidaṃ—
kāma vitakkaṃ, byāpāda vitakkaṃ, vihiṃsā vitakkaṃ).
§ For what reason? These thoughts, bhikkhus, are without real substance (Nete, bhikkhave,
vitakkā atthasaṃhitā), irrelevant to the fundamentals of the holy life, and do not lead to escape
from the sense world, to dispassion, to cessation, to peace, to direct knowledge, to
enlightenment, to Nibbāna.
When your mind starts such thoughts, bhikkhus, you should think: ‘This will lead to suffering’.
§ Instead, you should think: ‘These are the causes of suffering’; you should think: ‘The way to
cessation of suffering by cultivating thoughts of renunciation and compassion”.
Such thoughts will lead to escape from the sense world, to dispassion, to cessation, to peace, to
direct knowledge, to enlightenment, to Nibbāna“.
8. In many instances, the words vitakka and vicāra are used specifically to indicate “bad thoughts” or
defiled thoughts.
§ However, in some cases, they are used to indicate “all kinds of thoughts good or bad”.
§ Therefore, one must be able to identify which meaning to use. It will be clear in the context that
the words are used, as explained in the above examples.
9. When one generates thoughts that specifically do not involve kāma rāga or other akusala — but
the opposites (nekkhamma/kusala) — those are called savitakka and savicāra.
§ That is how one gets into jhāna: By eliminating (or suppressing) vitakka/vicāra and cultivating
savitakka/savicāra.
10. This is clearly seen in any sutta that describe jhāna. For example, in “WebLink: suttacentral:
Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)“: “..So kho ahaṃ, ānanda, vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi
savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharāmi.”
§ Translated: “Ānanda, when one stays away from vitakka/vicāra with kāma rāga and akusala
AND cultivates savitakka/savicāra, one will get into the first jhāna”.
§ However, vitakka/vicāra with kāma rāga and/or akusala may come to the mind once in a while.
11. The absence of any “bad thoughts” is indicated by avitakka, avicāra. In this case, one would
only have savitakka, savicāra (good thoughts).
§ That happens in the second jhāna, where only savitakka/savicāra remain.
§ Therefore, it is important to realize that avitakka/avicāra DOES NOT mean “without
thoughts”; is just means the absence of bad thoughts.
12. This is very clear at the end of the “WebLink: suttacentral: Upakkilesa Suatta (MN 128)“: “ ..So
kho ahaṃ, anuruddhā, savitakkampi savicāraṃ samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ, avitakkampi vicāramattaṃ
samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ, avitakkampi avicāraṃ samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ, sappītikampi samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ,
nippītikampi samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ, sātasahagatampi samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ, upekkhāsahagatampi
samādhiṃ bhāvesiṃ..”
§ Translated: “Anuruddha, I (systematically) cultivated the savitakka savicāra samādhi,
avitakka vicāramattaṃ samādhi (absence of vitakka with a trace of vicāra left), avitakka
avicāra samādhi (absence of vitakka and vicāra), sappītikampi samādhi (with pīti or joy),
nippītikampi samādhi (absence of pīti or joy), sātasahagatampi samādhi (with only sukha left),
and upekkhāsahagata samādhi (sukha also removed to be in the upekkhā state)”.
§ What the Buddha described above is getting to the first jhāna with savitakka savicāra, and then
to the second jhāna with absence of vitakka and vicāra (with pīti and sukha), third jhāna with
just sukha (joy removed), and the fourth jhāna with sukha also removed and with just upekkhā).
§ For a description of Ariya jhāna with jhānānga removed at each successive stage, see,
“WebLink: suttacentral: Rahogata Sutta (SN 36.11)“, for example.
13. “WebLink: suttacentral: Akusala Vitakka Sutta (SN 9.11)” provides another example: “Tena kho
pana samayena so bhikkhu divāvihāragato pāpake akusale vitakke vitakketi, seyyathidaṃ—kāma
vitakkaṃ, byāpāda vitakkaṃ, vihiṃsā vitakkaṃ“.
§ Meaning: “That bhikkhu was engaged in generating highly immoral (pāpa) and akusala
vitakka during his resting time – they were: sensual, with ill-will, and cruel.
§ Another verse in the same sutta: “Ayoniso manasikārā, so vitakkehi khajjasi..” or “with wrong
mindset (ayoniso manasikāra), he is burdened with such defiled thoughts”.
14. Saṅkhāra are different types, so it is necessary to get an idea of how to use these basic definitions
of vitakka, vicāra, savitakka, savicāra and avitakka, avicāra, in terms of different types of saṅkhāra:
puññābhisaṅkhāra, apuññābhisaṅkhāra, anenjābhisaṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī
Saṅkhāra” and “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
4.7.3 Jhānic Experience in Detail – Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2)
March 2, 2019
Introduction
1. The jhānic experiences in the first four jhāna are clearly described by the Buddha in the
“WebLink: suttacentral: Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2)“.
§ There are many conceptions about what it feels like to be in different jhānic states. Therefore, it
is good to have a description by the Buddha himself in order to get a good idea about the
experience.
§ It is a long sutta, and I will just provide the English translation for the relevant sections of sutta.
The Pāli version can be found in the link above.
2. Jhānic experiences in Ariya and anariya jhānās may have some common features, since these
jhānās correspond to mental states of rūpāvacara brahma realms. However, the Buddha clearly
stated that anariya jhāna are “burdened” and not as peaceful as Ariya jhānās; see, “Tapussa Sutta
(AN 9.41)– Akuppā Cetovimutti“.
§ In order to get into jhāna, one must transcend (elevate one’s mindset above) the sensual realms
(kāma loka).
§ This means one’s mind needs to be devoid of any sensual thoughts (kāma rāga) and dasa
akusala AND focused on thoughts of renunciation and compassion (savitakka/savicāra). In any
sutta describing the jhānic experience, there is this phrase: “So vivicceva kāmehi, vivicca
akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
upasampajja viharati..“.
§ Translated: “Withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from akusala thoughts, and engaged
in thoughts of renunciation and compassion , he enters and remains in the first jhāna..”.
Experience in the First Jhāna
3. “Withdrawn from sense pleasures, withdrawn from akusala thoughts, he enters and dwells in the
first jhāna, which is accompanied by savitakka and savicāra (applied and sustained moral thoughts).
His mind is filled with joy (pīti) and whole body is suffused and filled with bodily happiness (sukha)
born from withdrawal from sense pleasures (kāma) and akusala thoughts. There is no part of his
entire body which is not suffused by this rapture and happiness. (It should be noted that
vitakka/vicāra or kāma and akusala thoughts are not completely removed in the first jhāna).
§ “Great king, suppose a skilled bath attendant or his apprentice were to pour soap powder into a
metal basin, sprinkle it with water, and knead it into a ball, so that the ball of soap-powder be
pervaded by moisture, encompassed by moisture, suffused with moisture inside and out, yet
would not trickle. In the same way, great king, the bhikkhu drenches, steeps, saturates, and
suffuses his body with the rapture and happiness born of seclusion, so that there is no part of his
entire body which is not suffused by this rapture and happiness. This, great king, is a visible
fruit of a life abstaining from kāma and akusala.
rapture and happiness. This too, great king, is a visible fruit of a life abstaining from kāma
and akusala.
§ Ariya jhānās require a level of comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa in addition, and thus only Ariyas
(Noble Persons) can attain them; see, “Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)– Akuppā Cetovimutti“.
Eventual Outcomes of Ariya and Anariya Jhāna
9. Both types of jhāna lead to rebirth in corresponding brahma realms. However, those with anariya
jhāna will come back to the human realm at the end of lifetime there, and could be born in the apāyās
in the future.
§ On the other hand, those who have cultivated Ariya jhānās will never come back to kāma loka,
let alone apāyās. They will attain Nibbāna (Arahanthood) in brahma realms.
10. This is clearly explained in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamanānākaraṇa Sutta (AN 4.123)”
and several other suttas.
For example, regarding those who have cultivated the first anariya jhāna: “Idha, bhikkhave,
ekacco puggalo vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ
pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati. So tadassādeti, taṃ nikāmeti, tena ca vittiṃ
āpajjati. Tattha ṭhito tadadhimutto tabbahulavihārī aparihīno kālaṃ kurumāno brahmakāyikānaṃ
devānaṃ sahabyataṃ upapajjati. Brahmakāyikānaṃ, bhikkhave, devānaṃ kappo āyuppamāṇaṃ.
Tattha puthujjano yāvatāyukaṃ ṭhatvā yāvatakaṃ tesaṃ devānaṃ āyuppamāṇaṃ taṃ sabbaṃ
khepetvā nirayampi gacchati tiracchānayonimpi gacchati pettivisayampi gacchati“.
§ Translated: “An individual, withdrawn from kāma rāga, withdrawn akusala, enters and
remains in the first jhāna filled with joy (pīti) and whole body is suffused and filled with
bodily happiness (sukha). If he does not lose the jhāna at death, he is born among the
Brahmakāyika devas, who have a life span of an eon. These normal humans (puthujjano),
having used up all the life-span of those devas, may go to hell (niraya), to the animal
realm, and to the state of the hungry ghosts (peta) “.
On the other hand, those who have attained the first Ariya jhāna: ” Bhagavato pana sāvako
tattha yāvatāyukaṃ ṭhatvā yāvatakaṃ tesaṃ devānaṃ āyuppamāṇaṃ taṃ sabbaṃ khepetvā
tasmiṃyeva bhave parinibbāyati“.
§ Translated: “But a disciple of the Blessed One, having stayed there, attains Nibbāna from
there”.
11. The same is stated about those who have attained the second, third, and fourth anariya jhāna.
None of them is free from the apāyās.
§ On the other hand, those who have cultivated Ariya jhāna attain Nibbāna from those
corresponding brahma realms.
12. Finally, this discussion about getting rid of (or at least suppressing) any sensual thoughts or kāma
rāga may discourage those who are new to Buddha Dhamma.
§ That should not be the case; see, “Is It Necessary for a Buddhist to Eliminate Sensual Desires?”
and “Starting on the Path Even without Belief in Rebirth“.
4.7.4 Ascendance to Nibbāna via Jhāna (Dhyāna)
October 4, 2017; #14 revised on October 5, 2017; November 15, 2017; November 30, 2018
(including #8)
1. There are three categories: One can attain magga phala without jhāna; one can attain jhāna and
not have magga phala; one can attain magga phala and then cultivate jhāna. In order to sort these
out, one needs to understand the difference between Ariya (supramundane) and anāriya (mundane)
jhāna, and whether (and how) they are related to magga phala.
§In a series of posts based on material from the Tipiṭaka, I will try to put together a consistent
picture. Please let me know ([email protected]) if I make any mistakes, because this is of
great importance to everyone.
§ Even before the Buddha, ancient yogis cultivated jhāna and attained what they believed to be
cetovimutti (liberation via calming the mind). But the Buddha showed that such cetovimutti is
temporary; one would not attain akuppā cetovimutti (true and unshakable liberation) until
Nibbāna is realized; see, “Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)– Akuppā Cetovimutti“.
2. Nibbāna can be approached two ways via jhāna: (i) through any of the rūpavacara anāriya
(mundane) jhāna, (ii) first attaining the Sotāpanna stage and then through Ariya (supramundane)
jhāna.
§ Of course there is another way attain Nibbāna, without any jhāna, in paññāvimutti (liberation
with wisdom); see below.
§ If one takes the path via Ariya jhāna., then one would attain cetovimutti and paññāvimutti at the
same time, and is said to be an ubhatovimutti Arahant. This is also called akuppa cetovimutti
or unshakable/unbreakable cetovimutti. That is what the Buddha attained on the night of the
Enlightenment. [ubhato : [ind.] in both ways or sides; twofold.][It is also called ‘unshakable
deliverance of mind’ (akuppa-cetovimutti)][akuppa : [adj.] steadfast; unshakable.]
§ Those yogis who attain cetovimutti via anāriya jhāna have not removed avijjā anusaya; that is
why they are not liberated. The they can be reborn in the kāma loka; see #4 below.
3. As the table below shows, the level of suffering decreases AND levels of both mundane and
nirāmisa sukha increases as one moves successively to higher realms.
§ In the post, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma – Introduction“, we described a model
that consisted of 31 concentric “shells”. The actuality is pretty much close to that analogy, with
some additional features. I have compiled a summary of the 31 realms in the table “31 Realms
of Existence“.
§ From those posts, it is clear that as one goes from the apāyas through higher kāma loka to rūpa
loka, and finally to arūpa loka, attachments to “this world” get weaker AND actual suffering
decreases too.
§ It seems that the highest arūpa realm is quite close to Nibbāna. In a way it is — but
technically it is far away too.
4. Yogis like Alāra Kālāma and Uddakarāmaputta, who had attained highest arūpa jhānas at the time
of the Buddha, believed that the highest arūpavacara state was Nibbāna (or final release, vimutti).
Indeed, at that highest realm of Ne’va saññā nā saññā, connection to “this world” is ALMOST
cutoff, and one can experience the “highest bliss” that can be attained without realizing Nibbāna.
§ The Buddha (or rather the Bodhisattva), who learned to attain those highest jhānas from those
yogis, realized that all living beings had attained those state many times in the rebirth process,
and that is not the end of suffering.
§ He realized that until one completely removes all ten saṃsāric bonds (see, “Dasa Samyojana –
Bonds in Rebirth Process “), one will never be free of ANY of the 31 realms. As discussed in
that post, one SUCCESSIVELY and PERMANENTLY leaves the lowest realms (apāyas),
higher kāma loka realms, and then rūpa and arūpa realms by breaking those bonds (samyojana)
few at a time (by following the Noble Path).
5. However, one can TEMPORARILY enjoy the highest arūpa realms existence by cultivating even
the corresponding MUNDANE jhāna, i.e., those attained without removing ANY samyojana.
§ For example, while we live in this human realm we are not subjected to the harsh sufferings in
the apāyas, and we can enjoy the sense pleasures, mixed in with some suffering.
§ In the same way, when one is born in the rūpa realms, one will not be subjected to the
sufferings in the human realm, and the suffering is even less going from rūpa to arūpa realms.
§ However, since no samyojana are broken, one can be reborn in any of the realms in the future
(just like a normal human can be born in the apāyas in the future).
6. The easiest way to understand jhānic states is to examine the properties of the rūpa and arūpa
realms, in comparison to those of the lower realms. The following table can be useful here.
Generation/Stopping of
Realm(s) Level of Suffering Causes
Saṅkhāra
7. If you look at any sutta describing Ariya jhāna, it always starts with verse, “..bhikkhu vivicceva
kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ
jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati..”
We can see why the above table is helpful in understanding how one gets to jhānas by first
abstaining from akusala kamma (vivicca akusalehi dhammehi) and then kāma rāga (vivicceva
kāmehi).
Until one abstains from akusala kamma, one has no hope of escaping the apāyas. Here
§
abstaining does not mean complete removal.
§ Until one overcomes kāma rāga, one has no hope of escaping the kāma loka and ascending to
the rūpavacara realms.
§ However, one does not need to REMOVE kāma rāga (with anusaya) in order to attain
mundane (anāriya) jhāna, even up to the highest in the arūpa loka. This is why Alara Kalama
and Uddaka Rama Putta, who are in the arūpa realms right now, could be even reborn in the
apāyas in future lives.
§ All one needs to do is to have the mind focused on a neutral object in order to make it free of
akusala thoughts and kāma rāga while in the jhāna.
8. We can summarize the above conclusions in the following way:
§ One who is frequently engaged in akusala kamma is LIKELY to be born in the 4 lowest realms
(apāyas).
§ One who is frequently engaged in kusala kamma, AND avoids akusala kamma, but has
kāmaccanda, is LIKELY to be born in the human or the deva realms.
§ One who abstains from akusala kamma and kāmaccanda, can cultivate rūpavacara or
arūpavacara jhāna. With those mahaggata kusala kamma (mahaggata means higher), one
WILL be reborn in rūpa or arūpa loka at the next cuti-paṭisandhi transition.
§ However, one must not lose that jhāna until that moment, which means through possibly more
births as a human within the current human bhava.
§ This also explains why some people can easily get to jhāna. Those had cultivated jhāna in
recent human births within this human bhava.
§ However, if it is an anāriya jhāna, one has not been released from the apāyas, since one has not
removed avijjā by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
9.If one can stay away from akusala and also suppress kāma rāga, then one’s mind
AUTOMATICALLY moves to higher mental states. In other words, one starts feeling jhānic
pleasures (“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“).
§ When one is striving to discard kāma rāga, one is said to be cultivating mahaggata kusala
kamma. Here one goes beyond mundane moral actions (puñña kamma) of giving, helping, etc,
and lose (or suppress) craving for kāma rāga.
§ Therefore, while kusala kamma lead to rebirth in higher kāma loka (human and deva realms),
mahaggata kusala kamma lead to rebirth in rūpa and arūpa loka. One of course experiences
those jhānic states in this life as well.
§ The jhānic experiences experienced by yogis correspond to various rūpa and arūpa realms; see,
“31 Realms of Existence“. It is like one is born in the corresponding brahma realm for the
duration of the jhānic experience.
10. Mahaggata kusala kamma can be cultivated using Ariya (supramundane) or anāriya (mundane)
meditation techniques, and get to the same mental states (the difference is in how one gets there and
how permanent those states are).
§ Now it is easy to see that the key to cultivating the first mundane jhāna is to stay away from
akusala and also to suppress sense cravings. Then one’s mind will automatically pointed to the
first rūpavacara mental state, i.e., first jhāna.
11. One can get to the first anāriya jhāna by maintaining one’s attention on a fixed mundane object
(breath or a kasina object).
§ When one does this for long periods of time and also abstains from sensual pleasures (like
ancient yogis did), one can get in to the first jhāna, followed by successively higher jhāna,
when one practices for longer times.
§ The conventional breath meditation is a form of kasina mediation, since it focuses on the
breath.
12. In fact, this is how all living beings in the lower realms get into the Abhassara Brahma realm
when our world system (Cakkavata) is destroyed in a “loka vināsaya“. When the Sun starts heating
up, fine sense objects start being destroyed, and with time less and less sensual objects will be there
to trigger kāma rāga. All humans and animal will move to higher realms (over an antakkappa which
lasts billions of years).
§ When the human and animal realms are destroyed, all those beings would be reborn in the first
rūpa realms. When that is gradually destroyed, they will be reborn in the next higher realm and
so on, until they are all in the Abhassara realm.
§ Even though all dense material realms are all destroyed at the end of the loka vinasaya, all rūpa
and arūpa realms at or above the Abhassara realm remain intact. When the Solar system is “re-
formed” after billions of years, they all gradually come down to lower realms. I will discuss this
in more detail when I start explaining the Agganna Sutta.
§ Just like none of those living beings had removed their anusaya (or broken the
samyojana), one engaged in mundane jhānas has not removed them either.
13. On the other hand, one gets to the first Ariya jhāna by focusing on the “cooling
down” (Nibbāna) that one has seen. This is normally done by reciting/contemplating the verse “etan
santan etan paneetan…”, and also recalling one’s own experience of Nibbāna (cooling down).
The best example from the Tipiṭaka is Ven. Moggallana. We all know that Ven. Moggallana (who
was Kolita before becoming a bhikkhu), attained the Sotāpanna stage upon hearing a single verse
uttered by Ven. Assaji and then conveyed to him by Upatissa.
§ Then Kolita (and Upatissa) went to see the Buddha and were ordained. It took them a week to
two weeks to attain the Arahanthood. The WebLink: suttacentral: Moggallana Saṃyutta in the
Saṃyutta Nikāya has 9 suttas that describe step-by-step how Ven. Moggallana attained Ariya
jhānas one by one starting with the first Ariya jhāna. Thus it is quite clear that the
Sotāpanna stage comes before any Ariya (supramundane) jhāna.
§ In particular, the very first sutta there describes how the Buddha came to him by iddhi bala and
encouraged him to cultivate the first Ariya jhāna (WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamajhāna Pañhā
Sutta; SN 40.1): “..Atha kho maṃ, āvuso, bhagavā iddhiyā upasaṅkamitvā etadavoca:
‘moggallāna, moggallāna. Mā, brāhmaṇa, paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ pamādo, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ
saṇṭhapehi, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ ekodiṃ karohi, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ samādahā’ti..” OR
“..the Buddha came to me by iddhi bala and told me: Moggallana, Moggallana, Brahmana, do
not become delayed, cultivate the first jhāna..”.
§ The subsequent suttas in the Moggallana Saṃyutta describe how the Buddha instructed him
through each successive rūpavacara and arūpavacara jhāna all the way up to nirodha
samāpatti, where Ven. Moggallana developed all iddhi bala and became second only to the
Buddha in supernormal powers.
14. Thus, one needs to be at least a Sotāpanna in order to start cultivating Ariya jhāna. However, one
will truly be in the first Ariya jhāna only when one has REMOVED kāma rāga; see, for example,
“WebLink: suttacentral: Jhāna Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya 9.36)“. We will discuss this in detail in the
next post.
§ This means one is essentially an Anāgāmī by the time one is fully absorbed in the first Ariya
jhāna. But a Sotāpanna could be in the vicinity of the first Ariya jhāna. There are three levels
for a given jhāna: hīna (weak), majjima (middle), and panīta (strong).
§ After that one gets to higher Ariya jhānas by doing vipassana (insight meditation) on the
anicca nature of that jhāna that one is already in, i.e., by eliminating successive jhāna factors
OR one may be able to attain Nibbāna directly form there; see, “WebLink: suttacentral:
Sallekha Sutta (Majjhim Nikāya 8)“.
§ Since any jhāna is associated with either a rūpa realm or an arūpa realm, those states are
subject to the anicca nature, just like everything else that belong to this world of 31 realms.
15. Those who have higher wisdom can attain even the Arahant stage before getting to any jhāna or
from lower Ariya or anāriya jhāna; they are called paññāvimutti Arahants. They may cultivate
(Ariya) jhāna after the Arahanthood, in order to seek relief until the end of the current life. Jhānic
pleasures are the only “pleasures” recommended by the Buddha; of course, they are not sense
pleasures belonging to kāma loka.
§ It is said that those Arahants can cultivate all Ariya jhāna (and become cetovimutti as well) and
then get into nirodha samāpatti, where full Nibbānic bliss can be experienced for up to 7 days
at a time.
§ Such Arahants are called “liberated both ways” or ubhatovimutti.
16. A question arises as to whether one can get into anāriya jhāna while cultivating Ariya jhāna, i.e.,
while following kammatthana that are based on contemplating the Tilakkhaṇa and taking Nibbāna as
the ārammana. The unknown factor here is whether the meditator is really focused on those things.
§ Therefore, that is a question that can be answered only by the person in question. Just
because one is reciting Ariya kammatthana does not necessarily mean one will get to Ariya
jhāna. What really matters is whether one has attained the Sotāpanna stage first, because one
needs to keep Nibbāna as the arammana, not a worldly object (even light).
§ We know that Devadatta, who had cultivated anāriya jhāna AND attained iddhi powers, finally
ended up in an apāya. This was despite the fact that he had been exposed to the correct
interpretation of Tilakkhaṇa; apparently he had not grasped them.
§ I will discuss more on this in the next post, where I will present evidence from the Tipiṭaka
itself to make things clear.
17. However, anāriya jhāna cannot be labelled as “bad”. They are higher mental states, and those
who have cultivated anāriya jhāna will have an easier time attaining magga phala. One needs to
contemplate the anicca nature of jhānic states.
§ One can attain any magga phala up to full Nibbāna (Arahanthood) from the vicinity of ANY
of the anāriya jhāna. This is how the 89 citta become 121 citta; see, “The 89 (121) Types of
Citta“.
§ When it is said, “from the vicinity of ANY of the anāriya jhāna“, that includes the vicinity of
the first mundane jhāna, i.e., just upacara samādhi. This is why jhāna are not NECESSARY to
attain magga phala, and it is “Sammā Samādhi” in the Noble Eightfold Path that gets to Sammā
Ñana and Sammā Vimutti (i.e., Arahanthood).
18. The key question is “If mundane and supramundane jhāna seem to have the same characteristics
that one feels, then how does one determine whether one has attained mundane or supramundane
jhāna?
§ As we saw above, one gets to the first Ariya jhāna by REMOVING kāma rāga, not just by
suppressing as in anāriya jhāna, i.e., one is essentially an Anāgāmī if one can be fully absorbed
in the first Ariya jhāna.
§ While it may not be straight forward to determine whether one is a Sotāpanna or not, it is fairly
easy to determine whether one is an Anāgāmī, who has removed all kāma rāga: one’s
CRAVING for ALL sense pleasures (food, music, sex, etc) should not be there anymore. This
DOES NOT mean, for example, one should not eat tasty foods, or that one will not taste the
sweetness of sugar. But one will not have the urge to drink or to engage in sex, for example.
19. Finally, a common problem is that some people get attached to mundane jhānic pleasures, and get
trapped there (for some people even a state of calmness is enough!). They need to realize that anāriya
(mundane) jhānic states also belong to this world, and until those bonds to a given realm in this world
are removed, one would remain in the rebirth process (and thus future suffering in the apāyas is not
eliminated). We all have attained highest anāriya jhānas numerous times in our deep past.
§ Those who can easily get into anāriya (mundane) jhāna, can do so most likely because they had
cultivated jhāna in recent past lives, possibly in the current human bhava.
§ Furthermore, those who are unable to get into even anāriya (mundane) jhāna, should not be
concerned. It could just be that they had not cultivated jhāna in recent births. As discussed
above, jhāna are not necessary to attain magga phala. Thus there could be some people who
have even attained the Sotāpanna stage, but may be stressed unnecessarily because of
their inability to get in to jhāna.
The basic layout was presented in this post. We will get into details in the upcoming posts.
4.7.5 Paññāvimutti – Arahanthood without Jhāna
§ It is also clear that even a Sotāpanna Anugāmi is million-fold better than one with not just the
ability to get into jhāna, but even abhiññā powers, including the ability to travel through the
air, create things by mind power, etc.
§ Attaining jhānās can sometimes become a hindrance since many people get attached to jhāna
and stop making an effort towards magga phala, which is sad to see.
3. It takes time to cultivate jhāna, especially for those who had not cultivated them in recent past
lives. People who have high wisdom (paññā) may attain magga phala (even Arahanthood) within a
very short time, and they are called paññāvimutti Arahants or “wisdom-liberated”. Bahiya
Daruchiriya, who attained Arahantship upon listening to a single verse by the Buddha is a good
example; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Bahiya Sutta (Udana 1.10)“.
§ There are many who got to magga phala without ever getting to a jhāna. Alavaka Yaksa,
Upatissa, Kolita, Angulimala, minister Santati, and many others attained various stages of
Nibbāna by just listening to a single desanā.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 389
§ The Susima Sutta, also called “WebLink: suttacentral: Susimaparibbājaka Sutta (Saṃyutta
Nikāya 12.70)” discusses a group of Arahants who were paññāvimutti Arahants.
§ In that sutta, the Buddha explained to Susima that there are Arahants without any supernormal
(iddhi) powers, because they were paññāvimutti Arahants. Once attaining Arahanthood, they
have no desire to cultivate iddhi (abhiññā) powers, since they have seen the anicca nature of
those powers too.
4. In some exceptional cases, one may simultaneously gain abhiññā powers together with the
Arahanthood, within a very short time.
§ There are many who got to magga phala without ever getting to a jhāna. Alavaka Yaksa,
Upatissa, kolita, Angulimala, minister Santati, and many others attained various stages of
Nibbāna by just listening to a single desanā. The account of Santati can be found at:
“WebLink: tipitaka.net: Dhammapada Verse 142“.
§ Another prominent example in the Tipiṭaka is the story about the Culapanthaka Thero. He
almost disrobed because he could not even memorize a single gāthā after trying hard for
months. But with Buddha’s help, he was able to attain the Arahanthood in a day, and
simultaneously achieved abhiññā powers as well: “WebLink: suttacentral.net: Cūḷapanthaka“.
5. Some argue that WebLink: suttacentral: Sacca Vibhanga Sutta (MN 141) states that Sammā
Samādhi is attained ONLY WHEN one attains the first four jhānās. This is not correct. All one needs
to do is to get to the vicinity of to ANY of those four jhānās (thus one could get to the upcāra
samādhi for the first jhāna, for example), and attain magga phala from there.
§ Here is the relevant verse from the above sutta: “..Katamo cāvuso, sammāsamādhi? Idhāvuso,
bhikkhu vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ
pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati, vitakkavicārānaṃ vūpasamā ajjhattaṃ
sampasādanaṃ cetaso ekodibhāvaṃ avitakkaṃ avicāraṃ samādhijaṃ pītisukhaṃ dutiyaṃ
jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati, pītiyā ca virāgā upekkhako ca viharati … pe … tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ
… pe … catutthaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati, ayaṃ vuccatāvuso: ‘sammāsamādhi’..”.
§ The key is “upasampajja viharati“, which means one stays close to any one of those jhāna
(“upa” means close or in the vicinity), which means one can either get to that jhāna or can get
to upcāra samādhi for that jhāna. This is why it is not labelled as “Sammā Jhāna” but “Sammā
Samādhi“.
§ This becomes clear when you analyze how 89 types of citta become 121 citta, as explained
below.
6. The 89 (or 121) citta existing in the 31 realms are discussed in “The 89 (121) Types of Citta“.
§ There are 54 citta that could arise mainly in the kamavacara realms; 15 and 12 citta
respectively mainly arise in the rupāvacara and arupāvacara realms respectively. The total so
far is 81 citta.
§ Without going through any jhāna at all, there are 8 citta associated with the attainment of the
four stages of Nibbāna (4 magga citta and 4 phala citta). Then the total number of citta is 81
+8 = 89.
§ Now, one can attain each magga phala from the vicinity of 5 rupāvacara jhāna. For example,
the Arahanthood can be reached from the vicinity of each of those five jhāna. Thus in this case,
the total number of citta becomes 81 + 40 = 121.
§ It is to be noted that the five jhāna in the terminology of Abhidhamma are the same as 4
jhāna in the terminology of the suttas; the first jhāna in sutta terminology is split into two
in Abhidhamma.
7. In Anhidhamma, the above explanation becomes even more clear when one looks at the citta vīthi
to attain a magga phala):
B B B B B “BC BU MD P U A G M P P” B B B B B…..
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
390 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ For a discussion on citta vīthi, see, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
9. There is another piece of strong evidence from the Tipiṭaka that one does not need to attain
even the first Ariya jhāna in order to attain the Sotāpanna stage. We all know that
Ven.Moggallana (who was Kolita before becoming a bhikkhu), attained the Sotāpanna stage upon
hearing a single verse uttered by Ven. Assaji.
§ Then Kolita (and Upatissa) went to see the Buddha and were ordained. It took them a week to
two weeks to attain the Arahanthood. The WebLink: suttacentral: Moggallana Saṃyutta in the
Saṃyutta Nikāya has 9 suttas that describe step-by-step how Ven. Moggallana attained Ariya
jhānās one by one starting with the first Ariya jhāna. This is conclusive evidence that one
does not need to attain any Ariya jhāna before attaining even the Sotāpanna stage.
§ In particular, the very first sutta there describes how the Buddha came to him by iddhi bala and
encouraged him to cultivate the first Ariya jhāna (WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamajhāna Pañhā-
Sutta; SN 40.1): “..Atha kho maṃ, āvuso, bhagavā iddhiyā upasaṅkamitvā etadavoca:
‘moggallāna, moggallāna. Mā, brāhmaṇa, paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ pamādo, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ
saṇṭhapehi, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ ekodiṃ karohi, paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ samādahā’ti..” OR
“..the Buddha came to me by iddhi bala and told me: Moggallana, Moggallana, Brahmana, do
not become delayed, cultivate the first jhāna..”.
§ The subsequent suttas in the Moggallana Saṃyutta describe how the Buddha instructed him
through each successive rupāvacara and arupāvacara jhānās, where Ven. Moggallana
developed all iddhi bala and became second only to the Buddha in supernormal powers; see,
“Ascendance to Nibbāna via Jhāna (Dhyāna)“.
10. Therefore, one could get to the higher stages of Nibbāna via two paths.
§ One could cultivate jhānās and attain successively higher jhānās by comprehending the anicca
nature of those jhānās (as we mentioned above, they still belong to this world), and
REMOVING successive jhāna factors.
§ I will write more about this in the future, but the point is that those jhānic states are still
subjected to both the saṅkhāra dukkha and the viparināma dukkha, even though exempt from
dukkha dukkha temporarily.
§ The second path does not require jhāna; Sammā Samādhi is enough. For those with higher
levels of wisdom (paññā), higher stages of Nibbāna can be arrived without going through
jhāna.
11. The second path is discussed in the WebLink: suttacentral: Kimatthiya Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya
11.1). Here one can start with comprehending dukkha, which leads to Nibbāna via the following
steps: saddhā, piti, passadhi, sukha, samādhi, yathabhutananadassana, nibbida, viraga, and to
vimutti; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Upanisa Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 12.23)“.
§ When one starts with lokuttara Sammā Diṭṭhi and follows the ariyakānta sīla (Sammā Vaca,
Sammā Kammanta, Sammā Ajiva), one will automatically get to Sammā Vāyāma, Sammā Sati
and Sammā Samādhi (these three path factors constitute Samādhi). By the way, Sammā Diṭṭhi
and Sammā Sankappa constitute paññā. So, the sequence is paññā, sīla, samādhi.
§ That Sammā Samādhi is all one needs to get to Sammā Ñāna (ultimate wisdom) and Sammā
Vimutti (ultimate release) and thus to attain the Arahanthood; fulfilling all ten factors lead to
the Arahanthood (“dasahangehi samannagato“).
12. One time a bhikkhuni asked Ven. Ānanda: “..‘yāyaṃ, bhante ānanda, samādhi na cābhinato
na cāpanato na ca sasaṅkhāraniggayhavāritagato, vimuttattā ṭhito, ṭhitattā santusito, santusitattā no
paritassati. Ayaṃ, bhante ānanda, samādhi kiṃphalo vutto bhagavatā’ti?“, OR
“bhante ānanda, I have this samādhi which is stable, without defilements, contented, joyful, and
without agitation. What did the Blessed One call this samādhi?”
Ven. Ānanda replied: “..‘yāyaṃ, bhagini, samādhi na cābhinato na cāpanato na ca sasaṅkhāranig-
gayhavāritagato, vimuttattā ṭhito, ṭhitattā santusito, santusitattā no paritassati. Ayaṃ, bhagini,
samādhi aññāphalo vutto bhagavatā’ti. Evaṃsaññīpi kho, āvuso, tadāyatanaṃ no
paṭisaṃvedetī”ti“, OR,
“Yes, bhikkhnuni, there is such a samādhi. The Blessed One called it Arahant phala samādhi that is
without any defilements”.
§ This is in the WebLink: suttacentral: Ānanda Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya 9.37). She was an
Arahant and she did not even realize that!
§ That samādhi, is tadāyatana or Nibbāna; see, “Nibbāna “Exists”, but Not in This World“.
Here we will discuss three key suttas from the Tipiṭaka to resolve some controversial arguments
about mundane (anariya) and supramundane (Ariya) jhāna. I would appreciate any comments
([email protected]) pointing out any errors in my analysis or any suggestions.
§ February 28, 2019: I have found several Tipiṭaka references so far to anariya jhāna, and a
short one is discussed at the end. The post, “Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)– Akuppā Cetovimutti”
clearly explains the difference between Ariya and anariya jhāna.
§ It is interesting to note that some suttas do not specifically label jhāna as Ariya or anariya. One
has to read a given sutta carefully to figure out which jhāna are discussed, but the conclusion
always is that anariya jhāna are worthless by themselves, unless used as a platform to attain
magga phala; see, “Samādhi, Jhāna, Magga Phala – Introduction“. As can be clearly seen in
this sutta, a Sotāpanna can cultivate anariya jhāna (i.e., without removing kāma rāga), and be
born in lower brahma realms. However, unlike those with anariya jhāna without magga phala,
that person will not come back to kāma loka.
§ June 8, 2018: There are suttas that discuss the critical differences; see, “Paṭhama Mettā
Sutta“.
1. The main characteristics and purposes of Ariya (supermundane) jhāna are described in detail in the
“WebLink: suttacentral: Jhāna Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya 9.36)“. The English translation (WebLink:
suttacentral: Mental Absorption) at that site is not good, so I will translate most of the sutta here.
However, the Sinhala Translation (WebLink: suttacentral: ඣානනිස්සයන සූත්රය) is much better; of
course anicca and anatta are translated incorrectly there too.
§ I will use key Pāli terms without translating, since anyone who is reading post is likely to
understand them. I think that would make it easier to read.
2. Now, I will translate the sutta, and the numbers below correspond to the paragraphs in the Pāli
version: “WebLink: suttacentral: Jhāna Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya 9.36)“.
#1. Bhikkhus, I will state the removal of āsava (mental fermentations) via the first jhāna, second
jhāna, third jhāna, fourth jhāna, ākāsānañcāyatana, viññāṇañcāyatana, ākiñcaññāyatana,
nevasaññānāsaññāyatana, saññāvedayitanirodha (the last four are the arūpavacara jhānic states).
Also, I have minimized wording to keep the paragraph short, just giving the meaning. [āsava: mental
effluent, pollutant, or fermentation, (lit: influxes), ‘cankers’, taints, corruption's, intoxicant biases.
There is a list of four (as in D. 16, Pts. M. , Vibh.): the canker of (wrong) views (diṭṭhāsava), of
sense-desire (kāmāsava), of (desiring eternal) existence (bhavāsava), and of ignorance
(avijjāsava).]
§ Thus the main purpose of jhānic states is to do insight meditation and remove āsava, not to
enjoy that jhānic “pleasure” or relief. Nibbāna is attained via the removal of āsava: “The Way
to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“.
§ There is a lot of important information in the next paragraph.
#2. Bhikkhus, I surely declare removal of āsava (mental fermentations) via the first jhāna. On account
of what do I say that? A bhikkhu abstaining from sense pleasures (vivicceva kāmehi), abstaining from
akusala, arrives in the vicinity of the first jhāna and dispels cravings (upasampajja viharati). He thus
contemplates on the anicca nature (aniccato), dukkha nature (dukkhato), disease-ridden nature
(rogato), cancer-like nature (gandato), arrow-like nature (sallato), painful (aghato), danger-ridden
(ābādhato), alien (parato), subject to destruction (palokato), an empty (suññato), not-fruitful and
leading to helplessness (anatto) OF rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa (rūpagataṃ
vedanāgataṃ saññāgataṃ saṅkhārāgataṃ viññāṇagataṃ). He turns his mind away from those
phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to Nibbāna: ‘etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ
sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānan’ti. [“It is
peaceful, it is serene, the expelling of all saṅkhāra, breaking of bonds, removing greed and hate;
Nibbāna”] Thus he gets rid of āsava. If he does not complete the removal of āsava, he would remove
the first five samyojana and thus will be born opapātika (in brahma loka) and attain parinibbāna
there, and will not return to this world (No ce āsavānaṃ khayaṃ pāpuṇāti, teneva dhammarāgena
tāya dhammanandiyā pañcannaṃ orambhāgiyānaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ parikkhayā opapātiko hoti tattha
parinibbāyī anāvattidhammo tasmā lokā).
§ Thus one cannot attain Ariya jhāna without comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta nature of
the pañcakkhandha.
§ The common verse, “..(pathamam) jhānam upasampajja viharati..” is commonly translated as,
“..enters and remains in the (first) jhāna..”. However, “upasampajja viharati” (“upa” + “san” +
“pajja“) means “abiding in the vicinity of clarifying and removing ‘san‘”; of course ‘san‘ are
lobha, dosa, moha or āsava. The prefix “upa” means “near or close”. For example,
“upasampadā” (“upa” + “san” + “padā“) means a bhikkhu has advanced and is getting close to
“sorting out ‘san‘” and thus to magga phala.
§ Now, let us recapture the three important steps in the above paragraph: First, one gets to
the jhāna by contemplating on a long list of faults (ādīnava) of the five aggregates rūpa,
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa that make up one’s world; see, “The Five Aggregates
(Panñakkhandha)“. [ādīnava:m. 過患, 患難, 過失, 危難. bad consequences (suffering) ,
difficult and dangerous situation rouble), fault ( nadvertent [not resulting from or achieved
(t i
§ Once one gets to the vicinity of the first jhāna, one could intensify it and be fully absorbed in it,
by contemplating on the relief that is already seen: ‘etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ
sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānan’ti.
This is the extra effort involved in cultivating jhāna, versus pannāvimutti path. [It is
peaceful, it is serene, the expelling of all saṅkhāra, breaking of bonds, removing greed and
hate; Nibbāna]
§ Thirdly, one can get to the higher jhāna by again contemplating the faults (ādīnava) of the five
aggregates.
#3. “Bhikkhus, an archer or archer’s apprentice were to practice on a straw man or mound of clay,
after a while he would become able to shoot long distances, to fire accurate shots in rapid succession,
and to pierce great masses; in the same way, a bhikkhu abstaining from sensuality, abstaining from
akusala, arrives in the vicinity (upasampajja) of the first jhāna”.
§ The rest is essentially the same as in #2 above from that point onward about how āsava are
removed by contemplating on those faults (ādīnava) of the five aggregates, to the following
confirmation statement at the end of paragraph to emphasize the following: “Bhikkhus, I surely
declare removal of āsava (mental fermentations) via the first jhāna”.
#4. This paragraph essentially repeats the same paragraph of #2 above, for the second, third, and
fourth jhāna. It is interesting that even at the fourth jhāna, one could only be guaranteed to become
an Anāgāmī. However, as mentioned in #2, one could attain the Arahanthood even from the first
jhāna, if all āsava are removed, and that of course will apply to any jhāna through the fourth.
#5. Same verse as #3 repeated for the second, third, and fourth jhāna, with the paragraph ending,
“..Bhikkhus, I surely declare removal of āsava (mental fermentations) via the fourth jhāna“.
#6 , #7. The paragraphs in #2 and #3 for the first jhāna are now repeated for the first arūpavacara
jhāna: ākāsānañcāyatana.
#8 , #9. The paragraphs in #2 and #3 for the first jhāna are now repeated for the second and third
arūpavacara jhāna: viññāṇañcāyatana and ākiñcaññāyatana. Again, it is interesting that even at
these higher arūpavacra jhāna, one could only be guaranteed to become an Anāgāmī.
#10. “As for the two saññāsamāpatti āyatana – nevasaññā nā saññāyatana samāpatti and
saññāvedayitanirodho – they remove āsava and will lead to the faultless state of Nibbāna.”
§ Thus if one gets to the highest arūpavacra Ariya jhāna, one will definitely attain the
Arahantship, and also will be able to get to nirodha samāpatti (saññāvedayitanirodho).
3. That is, in essence, the complete sutta, which provides many key insights that have been hidden
surprisingly. I almost fell off my chair when I first read it. I am not sure how and why modern
translators failed to understand the importance of this sutta.
§ Then I started reading more suttas, and realized that these key pieces of information are in
many other suttas as well. See, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral: Cūḷa Vvedalla Sutta (MN
44)” AND “WebLink: suttacentral: Kāyagatāsati Sutta (MN 119)“.
4. We can learn a lot of key aspects of Ariya jhāna from this important sutta. Let us begin with the
fact that one gets to the vicinity (upasampajja) of the first jhāna by contemplating the faults
(ādīnava) of pañcakkhandha (rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa); once getting there, one
further removes āsava by the same process.
§ Thus, one gets to jhāna with insight meditation (vipassana) on the unsuitability (faults of)
kāmavacara states, and then once getting to jhāna, starts doing vipassana on the unsuitability
of any jhānic state in order to transcend that state.
§ There is a long list of such faults (ādīnava) (from #1): anicca nature (aniccato), dukkha nature
(dukkhato), disease-ridden nature (rogato), cancer-like nature (gandato), arrow-like nature
(sallato), painful (aghato), danger-ridden (ābādhato), alien (parato), subject to destruction
(palokato), an empty (suññato), not-fruitful and leading to helplessness (anatto).
5. Therefore, the main goal at any given Ariya jhāna is to contemplate on all those faults (ādīnava) of
that state — thus move to the next higher state — and to finally arrive at Nibbāna at the last (8th)
jhāna. Of course, one could completely remove all āsava and attain Nibbāna from any lower jhāna.
§ If one attains Nibbāna from a lower jhānic state (below the highest arūpavacara jhāna), one is
said to attain pannāvimutti. If one goes through to that highest jhāna and attains Nibbāna, one
is said to have attained akuppā cetovimutti. I will have separate post on this.
§ While the word “jhāna” has come to common use, a better word is “dhyāna” (ඣාන in Pāli and
දැවීම in Sinhala, meaning “burning”).
§ We will stick with the word “jhāna” instead of “dhyana“, since it is in common use. It is just
useful to know where the meaning comes from.
6. It is obvious that one can think clearly in any jhāna. Even intermittent vitakka/vicara (“wheeling
around” with stray thoughts) will be absent after the second jhāna, i.e., one is in the avitakka/avicara
(free of vitakka/vicara) mode after the second jhāna; I will discuss jhānanga or jhāna factors in a
future post.
§ This is why Ariya jhāna are helpful in insight (vipassana) meditation. The mind becomes clear
when more and more saṅkhāra are removed as one proceeds to higher jhāna states.
7. Even though the relief experienced in Ariya jhāna is the only “enjoyment” recommended by the
Buddha, that is not the main purpose of Ariya jhāna. That is because if one gets attached to a jhāna,
one is not able to move up to the higher one. In any case, it is mainly those who get to anariya jhāna,
get attached to them (however, it is possible to attain any stage of magga phala even with anariya
jhāna or even without any jhāna). If one has seen the anicca nature, one would not get attached to a
jhāna.
§ In that context, in a previous post it was discussed that any jhānic state is a mental state
corresponding “this world”; see, “Ascendance to Nibbāna via Jhāna (Dhyāna)“.
8. Pancanīvarana are also completely removed at the first Ariya jhāna. From the WebLink:
suttacentral: Mahāvedalla Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 43): “.. Idhāvuso, paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
samāpannāssa bhikkhuno kāmacchando pahīno hoti, byāpādo pahīno hoti, thinamiddhaṃ pahīnaṃ
hoti, uddhaccakukkuccaṃ pahīnaṃ hoti, vicikicchā pahīnā hoti..”.
§ There are many suttas that clearly state such conditions for the first supramundane jhāna.
§ In contrast, neither the five samyojana nor the pancanīvarana are removed in any mundane
jhāna. The reasons are obvious: none of the keles (klesha/defilements) can be removed by
taking a neutral object as the ārammana.
9. This is why the Buddha told Ven. Saddhā: “..“Ājānīyajhāyitaṃ kho, saddhā, jhāya; mā
khaḷuṅkajhāyitaṃ..”, OR “Saddha, cultivate the ajānīya (thoroughbred horse) jhāna, not the
khalunka (mule) jhāna“: WebLink: suttacentral: Saddhā Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya 11.9).
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Sutta Central translation, khalunka is translated as colt (a young
horse). But the correct translation is mule. As described in the sutta, a mule is lazy and useless,
compared to a thoroughbred horse.
§ As described in the sutta, one who cultivates mundane jhāna takes a worldly objects (kasina,
breath) as ārammana, and even though can attain jhāna, will not have the respect of the devas
who can see the ārammana.
§ On the other hand, devas cannot see the ārammana (Nibbāna) of those who have cultivated
Ariya jhāna, and they pay to him from a distance.
10. Therefore, there is a HUGE difference in HOW one on arrives at a given jhāna.
§ One using the anariya path gets to jhānas by focusing one’s mind on a mundane object, i.e., an
object belonging to this world (for example, one’s own breath or a kasina object) and/or by
contemplating on mundane moral thoughts (benevolent, kind, etc); we will discuss this in the
next post.
§ One on the Noble Path, on the other hand, arrives there by contemplating on Nibbāna, i.e., the
anicca, dukkha, anatta nature of this world of 31 realms. One may or may not get to Ariya
jhāna that one can get into samāpatti (meaning uninterrupted jhāna, where the jhāna citta runs
continuously without break), before getting to the Arahanthood.
§ However, jhāna sukha is the only sukha recommended by the Buddha, since sense pleasures
will bind one to the kāma loka. It is said that some pannāvimutta Arahants cultivate jhāna after
attaining Arahanthood.
11. Also see the previous post where it is discussed how Ven. Moggallana cultivated the first jhāna
after attaining the Sotāpanna stage: “Ascendance to Nibbāna via Jhāna (Dhyāna)“.
§ One who can get fully absorbed in the first Ariya jhāna will be born in the Suddhavasa realms
of the rūpa loka, and will not come back to the kāma loka, i.e., one is an Anāgāmī, as clearly
stated in the Jhāna Sutta and several other sutta (REF).
§ On the other hand, one who cultivates mundane first jhāna will be born in the first
rūpavacara Brahma realm in the next birth, but in later rebirths could be even born in the
apāyas (since kāma rāga was only suppressed, not removed).
12. One can get into mundane (anariya) jhāna via such breath or kasina meditation, and one could do
vipassana from such mundane jhānic states.
§ But the problem is, in many cases, people get addicted to those states and are unable to see the
anicca nature of them.
13. In contrast to the above suttas (and more that I found) on Ariya jhāna, I found other suttas that
discussed anariya jhāna. In none of these suttas, there was specific label saying Ariya jhāna or
anariya jhāna. However, one can clearly see which is which when reading text.
§ In the following reference, it is clearly stated that kāma raga is only suppressed
(vikkhambhanato) in all rupavacara and arupavacara jhāna. On the other hand it states that
kāma raga is removed (samucchedato) in stages via magga phala.
§ The difference between vikkhambhana pahāna and samuccheda pahāna is discussed in,
“Suffering in This Life – Role of Mental Impurities“.
The following are the two relevant passages from the Khuddaka Nikāya, Mahāniddesa,
Aṭṭhakavagga: WebLink: suttacentral: 1. Kāmasuttaniddesa . There is no English translation there,
but the Sinhala translation is given: WebLink: suttacentral: කාම සූත්රනිර්දෙශය.
Paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ bhāventopi vikkhambhanato kāme parivajjeti … pe … dutiyaṃ jhānaṃ
bhāventopi … tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ bhāventopi … catutthaṃ jhānaṃ bhāventopi …
ākāsānañcāyatanasamāpattiṃ bhāventopi … viññāṇañcāyatanasamāpattiṃ bhāventopi …
ākiñcaññāyatanasamāpattiṃ bhāventopi … nevasaññānāsaññāyatanasamāpattiṃ bhāventopi
vikkhambhanato kāme parivajjeti. Evaṃ vikkhambhanato kāme parivajjeti.
§ Translated: “kāma” is suppressed (vikkhambhanato) in the first jhāna, …to
nevasaññānāsaññāyatana (highest arupavacara jhāna). As we saw above, kāma is removed
even before getting to Ariya jhāna. Thus, only anariya (mundane) jhāna are meant here.
§ I hope to discuss in detail the “WebLink: suttacentral: Tapussa Sutta (AN 9.41)” as another
example.
Kathaṃ samucchedato kāme parivajjeti? Sotāpattimaggaṃ bhāventopi apāyagamanīye kāme
samucchedato parivajjeti, sakadāgāmimaggaṃ bhāventopi oḷārike kāme samucchedato parivajjeti,
1. Nirodha samāpatti and various phala samāpatti are different, and they are very different from
jhāna and jhāna samāpatti.
§ The first two are related to Nibbāna. Jhāna belong to “this world”. Jhānas are basically the
mindsets that rūpāvacara and arūpāvacara brahmas enjoy.
2. Before starting the discussion, I would like to emphasize the following. Concepts that deals with in
this post, as well as that of Nibbāna (Arahanthood, in particular), are virtually impossible to imagine
for most people. However, there could be a few people who have studied these concepts in detail and
have some “nagging questions”, and hopefully this information will be helpful.
§ These concepts are contrary to ideas that normal humans are familiar with. Normal humans
crave for things in the material world so much, it is almost impossible to rationalize why one
would want to stop the rebirth process (i.e, to attain the Arahanthood). Therefore, it is a waste
of time to spend too much time thinking about such abstract concepts, at least until one gets to
the Sotāpanna stage; these concepts really start making sense only when one gets closer to the
Anāgāmi stage.
§ In the same way, it is hard to imagine for a normal human how nirodha samāpatti (where all
thoughts are stopped) can provide happiness. This is why I have explained in the “Nibbāna”
subsection that Nibbānic bliss is NOT a feeling of a pleasure (that would involve the vedanā
cetasika, and thus would belong to this world). It is more like the sense of relief one would feel
when a long-lasting migraine headache goes away.
§ With that out of the way, let us start the discussion.
3. First, it is important point to remember is that life is maintained by kammic energy, not via citta
vīthi. Therefore, kammaja kaya is present at ALL TIMES. Kammaja (“kamma” +”ja”) means
“kamma created”.
§ The kammaja kaya or the gandhabba (hadaya vatthu plus the five pasada rūpa) is created at
the cuti-paṭisandhi moment. The blueprint for our physical body is in the kammaja kaya
(gandhabba), and thus the physical body grows according to the kammaja kaya (gandhabba).
§ When one’s kammaja kaya for the present bhava runs out of kammic energy, a new kammaja
kaya matching the next bhava is initiated by kammic energy for the new bhava, at the cuti-
paṭisandhi moment.
4. Therefore, each of us has had a kammaja kaya corresponding to most of the realms in this world
from a time that cannot be traced to a beginning!
§ For those who are not familiar with those terms can use the “Search box” to find relevant posts.
For example, we have four types of “kaya”: kammaja, cittaja, utuja, and karaja kaya. That last
one is our physical body. Such a physical body is absent in rūpāvacara and arūpāvacara
realms (basically just the gandhabba).
5. Cittaja kaya means the flow of citta vīthi. Citta arise in the hadaya vatthu in the kammaja kaya.
§ Citta always run in “packets” or vīthi. Each pancadvara citta vīthi ALWAYS has 17 citta.
§ A manodvāra citta vīthi normally has 10-12 citta. However, as we mentioned above, when in a
samāpatti, manodvāra citta vīthi can run continuously. Therefore, there is no set upper limit to
the number of manodvāra citta running continuously when in a samāpatti.
§ The mind could be in different types of bhavaṅga states in between manodvāra/pañcadvāra
citta vīthi.
6. While the kammaja kaya is active AT ANY TIME, there CAN BE GAPS in the cittaja kaya.
§ Bhavaṅga is a “state of mind” other than bhavaṅga citta that sometimes come inside a citta
vīthi; see, “Bhava and Bhavaṅga – Simply Explained!“
§ When in a bhavaṅga state, there are no citta vīthi running, so there are not even universal
cetasika present. One just knows that one is living, but there is no thought object (ārammana).
§ So, when the mind is in a bhavaṅga state, there are no citta vīthi running. But the mind is “on”
and one knows that one is living. It is just that no citta vīthi running inside a bhavaṅga state.
§ A crude analogy of the bhavaṅga state is a TV set that is not tuned to a station. We can see
flickering of white dots on the screen and hear a background “hum”. But there is no picture. So,
the mind is “on” but has no thought object.
§ When an ārammana comes to the mind, the mind captures that sound, picture, smell, etc. That
is like that TV being tuned to a station and one can see the picture.
7. The main difference between any samāpatti and jhāna is that jhāna citta do not run continuously.
When one is in a jhāna, jhāna citta vīthi are interrupted by pañcadvāra citta vīthi running in between.
Pancadvāra citta vīthi are those coming through the five physical senses. Therefore, when one is in
jhāna, one can see, hear, etc.
§ But when one is in any type of samāpatti, the corresponding manodvāra citta vīthi run
continuously. Therefore, there is no opportunity for pañcadvāra citta vīthi to run, and thus one
in a samāpatti is totally unaware of the external environment.
8. One could also be in a jhāna samāpatti. In this case also, there are no pañcadvāra citta vīthi
interrupting the flow of jhāna citta vīthi. One in a jhāna samāpatti also will not see, hear, smell, etc.
§ It is with practice that one who can get into jhāna can develop the ability to get into jhāna
samāpatti. As one cultivates the jhāna, there will be less and less pañcadvāra citta vīthi coming
in between successive jhāna citta vīthi. Initially, only 2-3 jhāna citta vīthi flow before a
pañcadvāra citta vīthi comes in. With practice, one could be experiencing jhāna citta vīthi
continuously for hours.
9. However, in the asaññā realm, there is no cittaja kaya or even a bhavaṅga state. One does not
even know that one is alive. There is a fine physical body that is kept alive by kammic energy. So,
the kammaja kaya is there.
§ This is why the Buddha said it is a waste of time to get a birth in the asaññā realm by
cultivating asaññā meditation techniques. One will live in the asaññā realm for 500 mahā
kalpa (that is trillions of years), and just comes back to the human realm and start all over.
§ In a previous post I provided evidence that viññāṇa cannot exist without a rūpakkhandha.
However, rūpakkhandha can exist without viññāṇa.
§ If we become unconscious for some reason, that is like living in the asaññā realm during that
time. There is no bhavaṅga state there either. Life is maintained by the kammaja kaya via an
active rūpa jivitindriya (not the jivitindriya cetasika).
10. When one is in a phala samāpatti, that phala citta runs continuously.
§ For example, if one is in the Sotāpanna phala samāpatti, one has the Sotāpanna phala citta
running continuously. If one is in the Arahant phala samāpatti, the Arahant phala citta runs
continuously.
11. When one is in nirodha samāpatti, there are no citta vīthi or a bhavaṅga state. It is just like in the
asaññā realm.
§ But of course, there is huge difference between nirodha samāpatti and being in the asaññā
realm. One who can get to nirodha samāpatti has removed ALL DEFILEMENTS (and thus
avijjā), but one in the asaññā realm has not. So, at the end of the life in the asaññā realm, that
person would come back to the human realm and can be reborn even in the apāyas in later
rebirths.
§ This point actually explains why it is so peaceful not to have any citta running through the
mind. That is the closest explanation that can be given to a normal human as to how having no
citta can be so peaceful. But this is hard even to imagine for a normal human, as I mentioned at
the beginning. Those who cultivate jhāna, and get to higher jhānic states, can start seeing that
this is true. That is why they cultivate jhāna all the way up to the 8th jhāna (neva saññā nā
saññā).
12. Nirodha samāpatti is succinctly described in a verse in the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahāvedalla
Sutta (MN 43), where the difference between a dead body and the body of one in nirodha samāpatti
is described: “Yvāyaṃ, āvuso, mato kālaṅkato tassa kāyasaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā,
vacīsaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā, cittasaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā, āyu parikkhīṇo,
usmā vūpasantā, indriyāni paribhinnāni. Yo cāyaṃ bhikkhu saññāvedayitanirodhaṃ samāpanno
tassapi kāyasaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā, vacīsaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā,
cittasaṅkhārā niruddhā paṭippassaddhā, āyu na parikkhīṇo, usmā avūpasantā, indriyāni
13. Not all Arahants can get into nirodha samāpatti. Access to nirodha samāpatti is NOT by taking
Nibbāna as the thought object, but via the 8th jhāna. As one gets to higher jhāna, number of cetasika
in a citta get smaller, i.e., citta become less and less “burdened”.
§ An Arahant has to cultivate all the jhānas, and get to the 8th jhāna (neva saññā nā saññā). The
neva saññā nā saññā state is just a step away from stopping the arising of citta vīthi.
§ From that state, the Arahant can make a determination of how long to stay in nirodha
samāpatti, and make the transition from the neva saññā nā saññā state to nirodha samāpatti.
§ While anāriya yogis can get to the neva saññā nā saññā state, I am not certain whether they can
make the transition to nirodha samāpatti. Furthermore, I vaguely remember hearing in a
desanās from Waharaka Thero that an Anāgāmī who has cultivated the eight jhānas can get into
nirodha samāpatti.
14. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Pañcakaṅga Sutta (SN 36.19)” also clarifies another important point.
If there are no citta flowing with saññā or vedanā, when one is in saññāvedayita nirodha samāpatti,
how can one say that it is the ultimate happiness (Nibbanic bliss)?
§ Nibbanic bliss is not a cetasika vedanā, which would belong to this world. I have compared it
to the relief one feels when a long-experienced migraine headache finally goes away; see, the
Nibbāna subsection.
The above sutta, in the last verse, put it this way: “Ṭhānaṃ kho panetaṃ, ānanda, vijjati yaṃ
aññatitthiyā paribbājakā evaṃ vadeyyuṃ: ‘saññāvedayitanirodhaṃ samaṇo gotamo āha, tañca
sukhasmiṃ paññapeti. Tayidaṃ kiṃsu, tayidaṃ kathaṃsū’ti?
Evaṃvādino, ānanda, aññatitthiyā paribbājakā evamassu vacanīyā: ‘na kho, āvuso, bhagavā
sukhaññeva vedanaṃ sandhāya sukhasmiṃ paññapeti. Yattha yattha, āvuso, sukhaṃ upalabbhati,
yahiṃ yahiṃ taṃ taṃ tathāgato sukhasmiṃ paññapetī’”ti.”
Translated : “It may happen, Ānanda, that Wanderers of other sects will be saying this: ‘The recluse
Gotama speaks of the saññāvedayita nirodha and describes it as pleasure. What is this pleasure and
how is this a pleasure?
“Those who say so, should be told: ‘The Blessed One describes as pleasure not only the feeling of
pleasure. But a Tathagata describes as pleasure whenever and wherein so ever it is obtained.'”
15. No citta vīthi run in nirodha samāpatti, and bhavaṅga state is not present either. Life in the body
is maintained with kammic energy. No vedanā, saññā, etc. Maximum time in nirodha samāpatti is 7
days. The Arahant can make a determination before getting into nirodha samāpatti, as to how long
(up to 7 days) to stay in that state.
§ Parinibbāna state is just like nirodha samāpatti. The only difference is that there is no “coming
back” to this world upon entering Parinibbāna.
§ Therefore, Arahants tend to get to nirodha samāpatti whenever possible, in order to experience
the “Nibbānic bliss”, and to get away from the “burdensome worldly thoughts”. As I said, it is
hard for normal humans to imagine this.
16. In other types of samāpatti (other than the nirodha samāpatti), manodvāra citta vīthi will flow
continuously. There is no falling to bhavaṅga or to take an external object with a pañcadvāra citta
vīthi. Thus one cannot see, hear, etc. Normally, samāpatti will eventually break on its own or (when
one gets good at it) one can pre-set the time to be in samāpatti.
§ Arahant phala samāpatti is where an Arahant experiences the pabhassara citta, a pure citta
with just the universal cetasika, where the saññā cetasika is not contaminated. Nibbāna is the
thought object made contact with phassa cetasika and vedanā and saññā are based on that (we
have no idea about that). There, one does not hear, see, anything either, just like in jhāna
samāpatti.
§ When an Arahant is not in nirodha samāpatti or Arahant phala samāpatti, his/her citta get only
to the “mano” state, in the sequence that normally ends up in the viññāṇakkhandha state for a
normal human; see #4 of “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
17. Hopefully, that should cover the questions raised in the discussion forum under the topics:”
WebLink: Nirodha Samāpatti”, “WebLink: Difference between “Arahant phala samāpatti” and
“Nirodha samāpatti” ?”, and “WebLink: Nirodha Samāpatti and Amoha”.
§ If there are more questions on this and related issues, please ask them under the topic
“WebLink: Difference between “Arahant phala samāpatti” and “Nirodha samāpatti”?”. I am
going to close the other two topics, in order to not have too many parallel and related
discussions.
§ Please also include any references from the Tipiṭaka, for above descriptions. This post was put
together from what I have heard from Waharaka Thero‘s desanās, and I will also add
references as I come across them in the Tipiṭaka.
1. Grasping the message of the Buddha requires two essential ingredients, as I have been stressing
throughout the site: (i) It is easier done with a mind that has less defilements (kilesa or keles or
klesha), (ii) One needs to go beyond learning mundane interpretations of key concepts.
§ If those two conditions are satisfied, grasping deeper Dhamma concepts will not be a difficult
task. If one can comprehend — not merely to memorize — the key concepts, it actually
becomes easy to avoid getting the “vipareetha saññā” or the “incorrect impression” of a given
concept.
§ This process gradually leads to the comprehension of “anicca saññā” that is the key to the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
§ In this post, we will start a discussion that will lead to a better explanation of “saññā” (which is
one of the five aggregates) normally translated as “perception”.
2. In this subsection, we will discuss how we grasp a given concept that is explained to us via any one
of many human languages that are in use today.
§ In order to do that, it is essential to understand why the mental body (manomaya kāya or
gandhabba) is primary — initiating all our thoughts, speech, and actions. The physical body
that we value so much is secondary.
§ While our brains help us grasp what is expressed in a given language (and we have to learn a
given language), a gandhabba can grasp that message directly — without using a brain or eyes,
ears, etc. that are associated with the physical body. The gandhabba — when outside the
physical body — can see and hear without using eyes and ears, and grasp what is expressed by
thoughts of other beings directly (where allowed by their kammic potential).
§ Gandhabbas — and most living beings — communicate among themselves via “saññā“; there
is no language for them in the sense of languages that we use.
§ This is somewhat similar to how we experience dreams. We do not use our ears to hear in the
dreams; we just “perceive” what others say in our dreams. This is the closest analogy with how
a gandhabba hears when outside a physical body. Seeing is the same way: in dreams, we don’t
use our eyes to see; our eyes are closed when we dream. Both hearing and seeing are done with
the mind.
3. We crave ourselves physical bodies because we enjoy sense pleasures associated with smells,
tastes, and body touches that are available in the human and deva loka.
§ However, in order to experience those three types of sense contacts, our mental bodies need to
be trapped inside physical bodies. There is a price we pay for those sense enjoyments, because
those physical bodies are subject to rapid and unexpected decay and also have relatively short
lifetimes around 100 years.
§ Furthermore, when the mental body is enclosed or trapped inside a physical body, it loses the
ability to directly see external objects, hear external sounds, and also grasping dhamma
(concepts). Therefore, all six sense inputs now need to be processed by the brain and be
converted to a form (“saññā“) that can be grasped by the trapped mental body (gandhabba).
§ The sense of smell, taste, or body touches are not available to beings in the higher 20 (brahma)
realms; those beings just have mental bodies (with just a trace of matter) just like our
gandhabbas. Just like those brahmas, the gandhabbas cannot sense smell, taste, or body
touches, but can “directly see, hear, and grasp concepts” without the aid of a brain when outside
a physical body.
§ Please contemplate and grasp what is meant by those statements before proceeding further.
4. Another important factor is the difference between the lifetime of a physical body and that of a
mental body (gandhabba).
§ A human gandhabba that is born at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment can possibly live for many
hundreds to many thousands of years. Within a given “human bhava“, there can be many
repeated births as a human with a human body; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and
Births Therein“.
§ When a physical body dies (and if more kammic energy for the human bhava remains), that
gandhabba comes out of the dead body and waits for a suitable womb to re-enter and make a
new human body. This process can happen many times during a given human bhava. Each time
a different physical body is acquired by the gandhabba as discussed below.
§ Therefore, it makes more sense to focus on the well-being of the mental body (gandhabba) than
on the short-lived physical body.
5. There are a few exceptions to the above process.
§ If one commits an anantariya papa kamma (killing a parent, for example), the gandhabba that
comes out of a dead physical body “cannot sustain” that strong kamma vipāka and undergoes a
cuti-paṭisandhi moment and will be instantaneously born in an apāya suitable for that strong
kamma.
§ If one develops Ariya or anariya jhāna, then this also become a “good” anantariya kamma and
one will be born in a brahma realm (corresponding to the highest jhānic state attained) by
skipping the remaining human births. However, those get to brahma realms via anariya jhānas
will come back to human or lower realms. Any Ariya (starting with a Sotāpanna) who attains
Ariya jhānas will never come back to kāma loka. Of course, a Sotāpanna (Sakadāgāmī) without
Ariya jhānas will be reborn human (deva) realms.
§ This is also why an Arahant is not reborn, even if there is kammic energy left over for the
human bhava. The gandhabba that comes out “cannot bear” the mindset of an Arahant, and
will instantaneously undergo a cuti-paṭisandhi moment; but since an Arahant will not grasp a
new bhava, he/she will not be reborn.
§ Those above cases — where the human bhava is prematurely terminated — can be compared to
the burning of a heater coil used in an immersion heater, when the heated coil is taken out of
the water: As long as the heater coil is immersed in the water, it can “bear” the heat; but once
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Living Dhamma 403
out of the water, it will quickly burn out. The physical human body has the unique capability of
being able to “bear” any of those states discussed above.
6. Even though there is no discussion about the gandhabba in Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga, it is a
critical concept in Buddha Dhamma. The Buddha compared a gandhabba (sometimes also called a
Tirokuddha) coming out of a physical body to a sword being pulled out of the sheath that it is stored
in.
§ People with abhiññā powers can move the gandhabba out of the physical body at will.
§ There are also people who had cultivated abhiññā powers in recent previous births and are able
to do it at will even though they have less control over the mental body; they can float to the
ceiling and watch their inter physical body lying on the bed, for example. Furthermore, during
heart operations, the gandhabba can come out and watch the operation from the above, and
provide details about the operations later.
7. The gandhabba has only a trace of matter; it cannot be seen or touched, even though it has a trace
of matter. It is our mental body or manomaya kāya.
§ This mental body can be visualized as fine mesh spread throughout the physical body with the
seat of the mind (hadaya vatthu) overlapping the physical heart.
§ If that mental body comes out of the physical body, the physical body becomes as inert as a
piece of wood (as a dead body is).
8. Let us start by addressing some key objections that you may have on the concept of a mental body
controlling the physical body. First, how can a mental body move a heavy physical body?
§ How an almost weightless gandhabba can move a heavy physical body can be clarified by
comparing it to how a human operator controls a heavy military tank from the inside of that
totally enclosed tank. This is a very good analogy, where the human operator plays the role of
the gandhabba.
§ The human operator of course does not have enough energy to move the tank. He merely
controls the direction of the movement by instructing the on-board computer; the energy to
actually move the tank comes from the fuel stored in the tank.
§ In the same way, the mental body (gandhabba) instructs the brain to generate required bodily
movements or speech; here the brain plays the role of the computer in the military tank analogy.
The small amount of energy needed for the gandhabba comes from the kammic energy that led
to human bhava; energy for actual bodily movements (including speech) comes from the food
we eat.
§ Back in the 17th century, French philosopher Rene Descartes proposed that there is an
immaterial mind controlling the material body. But this proposal had a major problem of
explaining how an immaterial mind cause a heavy material body to move. The Buddha –2600
years ago — had described how this actually happens, as discussed above. More details will be
provided in future posts, and some posts are already in the Abhidhamma section.
9. In the above analogy, the operator is totally shielded from the external world. He can monitor the
outside environment only via the audio and video equipment mounted on the tank. The video
cameras, for example, feed in videos to an on-board computer, which analyzes and displays it on a
monitor for the operator to see.
§ In the same way, our physical eyes send picture to our brain, which analyzes them, converts to
a form (“saññā“) that can be “seen” — or comprehended — by the gandhabba inside. So, our
brain is the computer that conveys the information to the gandhabba that is really trapped
inside the solid physical body; see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“.
§ The gandhabba accesses other four physical sense inputs the same way, with the help of ears,
tongue, nose, and the body.
§ In fact, this is how those with abhiññā powers (even a few of us with gati from previous lives
where they had such abhiññā powers in recent lives) can communicate with beings in other
realms.
11. Then another question may arise, “Why do people look different in successive rebirths?”. That is
because the physical body in each human life (within the same human bhava) arise with contributions
from the parents for that life.
§ Even though the gandhabba brings in his/her gati (habits), āsava (cravings), kilesa (mental
impurities), etc from the previous life, the physical body for the new life has major
contributions from the new parents.
§ Therefore, the DNA of the physical bodies of two successive lives could be different due to this
reason. The building of a new physical body is described in the post, “What does Buddha
Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
§ Even then, a gandhabba normally is matched with parents that have similar gati.
12. Another interesting piece of information comes from how the Buddha (and others with iddhi
bala) traveled to deva or brahma loka with the manomaya kāya (which is the same as gandhabba),
leaving the physical body behind (the physical body does not die in this case, and is kept alive by the
rūpa jivitindriya). Upon returning, the manomaya kāya can re-enter the physical body.
§ Those who attain the fourth jhāna can develop iddhi powers to be able to separate the
manomaya kāya from the physical body and travel far with that manomaya kāya. The Buddha
stated that just as a sword can be pulled out of its sheath, those with iddhi powers can pull the
manomaya kāya out of the physical body.
§ In the suttas it is said that the Buddha visited deva or brahma lokas “within the time that takes a
bent arm to be straightened”.
§ As an aside, it is also possible for some of those with iddhi powers to travel with their physical
bodies. That involves a different mechanism which is not relevant to this discussion.
13. Even today, there are some ordinary people who can dissociate their mental body from the
physical body and can “astral travel”. That manomaya kāya can then go to distant places within very
short times (this is what is called astral travel in the present day; see the Wikipedia article,
“WebLink: WIKI: Astral projection“.
§ In fact, a gandhabba is the same as an “astral body” that is described in such accounts; see, for
example, “Journeys Out of the Body: The Classic Work on Out-of-Body Experience”, by
Robert Monroe (1992). There are two sequels to that book, as well as books by others; accounts
in at least some of those books are consistent with the above mechanism.
§ In addition, the gandhabba can come out of the physical body under stressful conditions, in
particular during heart operations. Many such accounts by a cardiologist have been documented
in the book, “Consciousness Beyond Life”, by Pim van Lommel (2010).
14. Many rebirth account features can be explained by the correct interpretation where the manomaya
kāya (gandhabba) inherits many successive (but time separated) physical bodies.
§ In rebirth stories, there is always a “time gap” between successive human births (jāti). They are
always separated by several years or at least few years. In between those successive lives, that
lifestream lives as a gandhabba, without a physical body.
§ In most rebirth stories, the previous human life was terminated unexpectedly, like in an
accident or a killing. Therefore, the kammic energy for the human bhava had not been
exhausted, and the gandhabba just came out of the dead body and waited for another womb to
enter.
§ The Buddha told Vacchagotta that the gandhabba survives that intervening time by using taṇhā
as āhāra. Some gandhabbas can “inhale” aroma from plants, fruits, etc, too.
15. If one has been following — and trying to “live” the moral life recommended in the previous
posts in this “Living Dhamma” section — it would be easier to follow the upcoming posts as we will
be diving a bit deeper.
§ One aspect of realizing the anicca nature is to see the futility of expecting to have a “future
happy life” by trying to make one’s physical body to be the “main focus”.
§ While it is essential to keep one’s body in good condition by eating well and by engaging in a
good exercise program, it is even more important to realize that this body will only last about
100 years, and the latter part of that could be burdened with unexpected physical ailments.
§ Thus one should try to improve the condition of the mental body (gandhabba) by cultivating
good gati and getting rid of bad gati.
Next, “Saññā – What It Really Means“, ..
4.8.2 Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka
September 16, 2017; revised September 30, 2107; November 14, 2018; August 31, 2019
Introduction
I will present extensive evidence from the Tipiṭaka that the gandhabba state is a necessary feature of
human (and animal) bhava. It is not an antarābhava (a state “in between two bhava“). It is within the
same human bhava.
§ One’s mental body (gandhabba or manomaya kāya) controls the physical body.
§ Gandhabba state remains through many successive human births within a given human bhava
(which can last many hundreds of years). When a given physical body dies, the gandhabba is
directed into another womb, when a matching one becomes available. Rebirth stories confirm
this account.
§ However, the gandhabba concept is different from the concept of a “soul”. A gandhabba will
keep changing during its lifetime. Furthermore, it will make a drastic change when the lifetime
of the human bhava comes to an end.
Background
1. At the Third Buddhist Council, Moggaliputta Tissa Thero proved that there is no antarābhava in a
debate with the Mahāyānists. That correct interpretation is in the Kathavatthu of the Tipiṭaka.
§ Most current Thervādins erroneously believe that gandhabba state is an “antarābhava” state.
That is not correct; see, “Antarābhava and Gandhabba” and “Cuti-Patisandhi – An
Abhidhamma Description.”
§ A human gandhabba exists within the human bhava.
2. A critical factor that contributes to this erroneous belief that the gandhabba state is an
“antarābhava” is the inability to distinguish between bhava and jāti. They erroneously believe that
paṭisandhi takes place in the womb. But it is evident in the sutta passages above, that it is okkanti
(of the gandhabba) that happens, not paṭisandhi.
§ A human existence (bhava) could last many hundreds or even thousands of years. Many human
births (jāti) can take place during that time; see, “Bhava and jāti – States of Existence and
Births Therein.”
§ In rebirth stories, there is always a “time gap” (of typically several years) between successive
human births (jāti). In between those successive lives, that lifestream lives as a gandhabba,
without a physical body.
§ Even during a given human life (jāti), the gandhabba may come out of the physical body under
certain conditions, see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE).”
§ It is the human bhava that is hard to attain (“How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth
in the Human Realm”). However, within a given human bhava, there can be many births until
the kammic energy for that human bhava runs out. Otherwise, how can one explain all these
rebirth stories, where a human is reborn only a few years after dying in the previous human
life?
3. I understand the reluctance of many to discard the deeply embedded idea that gandhabba is a
Mahāyāna concept. I used to have that wrong view too. But as I have discussed above, many things
will be left unexplained, and there will be many inconsistencies without it.
§ Most importantly, rejecting the idea of a gandhabba (i.e., the existence of a para loka) is a
micchā diṭṭhi. Thus one cannot even become a Sotāpanna Anugami with that micchā diṭṭhi; see,
“Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage” and “Hidden World of the Gandhabba:
Netherworld (Para Loka).” So, I would urge everyone to sift through the evidence carefully
and make an informed decision.
§ More evidence is in many other posts at the site. There are two subsections on gandhabba:
“Mental Body – Gandhabba” and “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya).”
§ One can also use the “Search” box on top right to locate all relevant posts by typing
“gandhabba.”
§ A simple description of the human conception, according to Buddha Dhamma is at: “Buddhist
Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception.” It could be useful to read that first.
Three Conditions for Conception per Suttas
4. The Buddha has described how three conditions must be satisfied for a conception to occur. That
includes how a gandhabba (nominative case singular is gandhabbo; plural is gandhabbā) descending
to the womb. For example, in the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā Tanhāsankhaya Sutta (Majjhima
Nikāya 38): “..Tiṇṇaṃ kho pana, bhikkhave, sannipātā gabbhassāvakkanti hoti. Idha mātāpitaro
ca sannipatitā honti, mātā ca na utunī hoti, gandhabbo ca na paccupaṭṭhito hoti, neva tāva
gabbhassāvakkanti hoti. Idha mātāpitaro ca sannipatitā honti, mātā ca utunī hoti, gandhabbo ca na
paccupaṭṭhito hoti, neva tāva gabbhassāvakkanti hoti. Yato ca kho, bhikkhave, mātāpitaro ca
sannipatitā honti, mātā ca utunī hoti, gandhabbo ca paccupaṭṭhito hoti—evaṃ tiṇṇaṃ sannipātā
gabbhassāvakkanti hoti. Tamenaṃ, bhikkhave, mātā nava vā dasa vā māse gabbhaṃ kucchinā
pariharati mahatā saṃsayena garubhāraṃ...”
Here is the WebLink: suttacentral: English translation from the Sutta Central website (I have slightly
modified it): “..Bhikkhus, the descent to the womb takes place through the union of three things.
Here, there is the union of the mother and father, but the mother is not in season, and the gandhabba
is not present—in this case no descent of an embryo takes place. Here, there is the union of the
mother and father, and the mother is in season, but the gandhabba is not present—in this case too no
embryo can result. All three following conditions must be met. Union of the mother and father, the
mother is in season, and a gandhabba is present. That leads to the formation of an embryo. The
mother then carries the embryo in her womb for nine or ten months with much anxiety, as a heavy
burden...”
§ Even though the venerable Bhikkhus who manage the Sutta Central website do not believe in
the concept of a gandhabba, they have at least correctly translated most of the Pāli verse.
§ By the way, the Sutta Central site is a useful resource. It provides access to not only the Pāli
version but also translations into several languages. I encourage everyone to contribute to that
website to maintain that valuable database.
§ One needs to keep in mind that some critical Pāli terms are translated are mistranslated
there. Those include anicca as impermanence and anatta as “no-self”. Furthermore,
translating complex Pāli words like viññāṇa and saṅkhāra as just single words in English
can lead to serious problems.
5. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Assalāyana Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 93), there is more evidence that
for conception to occur, a gandhabba needs to descend to the mother’s womb at the right time. That
needs to happen within a few days of the union of parents, and it needs to be during the mother’s
season.
Here, the Buddha explains to Assalayana how the seer Asita Devala questioned seven brahmanā who
had the wrong view that they were heirs to Mahā Brahmā. Here are the questions that seer Asita
Devala asked:
“Jānanti pana bhonto—yathā gabbhassa avakkanti hotī’ti? ”
§ “But do you, sirs, know-how there is conception in the womb?”
“Jānāma mayaṃ, bho—yathā gabbhassa avakkanti hoti ‘ti. Jānāma mayaṃ, bho – yathā gabbhassa
avakkanti hoti. Idha mātāpitaro ca sannipatitā honti, mātā ca utunī hoti, gandhabbo ca
paccupaṭṭhito hoti; evaṃ tiṇṇaṃ sannipātā gabbhassa avakkanti hotī’ti.”
§‘We do know, sir, how there is conception. There is coitus of the parents, it is the mother’s
season, and a gandhabba is present; it is on the conjunction of these three things that there is
conception.’
“Jānanti pana bhonto—taggha so gandhabbo khattiyo vā brāhmaṇo vā vesso vā suddo vā’ti?.”
§ “But do you, sirs, know whether that gandhabba is a noble or brahman or merchant or
worker?”
“Na mayaṃ, bho, jānāma—taggha so gandhabbo khattiyo vā brāhmaṇo vā vesso vā suddo vā’ti.”
§ “We do not know, sir, whether that gandhabba is a noble or a brahman or a merchant or a
worker.”
Therefore, the concept of a gandhabba was accepted even by other yogis at Buddha’s time.
6. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā Nidana Sutta (Digha Nikāya 15): “..Viññāṇapaccayā
nāmarūpan’ti iti kho panetaṃ vuttaṃ, tadānanda, imināpetaṃ pariyāyena veditabbaṃ, yathā
viññāṇapaccayā nāmarūpaṃ. Viññāṇañca hi, ānanda, mātukucchismiṃ na okkamissatha, api nu
kho nāmarūpaṃ mātukucchismiṃ samuccissathā”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante”. “Viññāṇañca hi, ānanda,
§ This is the okkanti (descending of the gandhabba) into the womb (gabbha), as described in the
Mahā Tanhasankhaya Sutta discussed above.
§ Almost the same description is also given in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Sampasādanīya Sutta
(Digha Nikāya 28).”
9. It is a Bodhisattva in the last birth that, “.. descends, abides and departs the womb knowingly”, the
fourth way of entering a womb, mentioned above.
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahāpadāna Sutta (Digha Nikāya 14): “..Atha kho, bhikkhave,
vipassī bodhisatto tusitā kāyā cavitvā sato sampajāno mātukucchiṃ okkami. Ayamettha
dhammatā.”
§ Translated: “..Now Vipassī bodhisattva, bhikkhus, left the Tusita realm and descended into his
mother’s womb mindful and knowingly. That is the rule.”
§ At the cuti-paṭisandhi moment in the Tusita realm, the deva died and a human gandhabba was
born, who entered the mother’s womb on Earth.
§ By the way, this sutta describes in detail the last seven Buddhas including Buddha Gotama,
who have appeared in our cakkāvāta within the past 31 mahā kappa (great eons). English
translation of the sutta at Sutta Central provides a useful summary in a table WebLink:
suttacentral: English translation of the Sutta at Sutta Central.
§ However, in this sutta, gabbhāvakkantiyo and okkami are translated incorrectly at Sutta Central.
Patisandhi Viññāṇa Same as Gandhabba
10. In the Bija Sutta (WebLink: suttacentral: Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.54), it is clear that viññāṇa cannot
“travel” without the other four aggregates, including the rūpakkhandha: “..Yo, bhikkhave, evaṃ
vadeyya: ‘ahamaññatra rūpā aññatra vedanāya aññatra saññāya aññatra saṅkhārehi viññāṇassa
āgatiṃ vā gatiṃ vā cutiṃ vā upapattiṃ vā vuddhiṃ vā virūḷhiṃ vā vepullaṃ vā paññāpessāmī’ti,
netaṃ ṭhānaṃ vijjati“.
“Bhikkhus, I say that it is impossible for viññāṇa to exist, to grow, and to move at rebirth in the
absence of form, feeling, perception, and saṅkhāra.”.
§ The first 5 samyojanā are called orambhāgiyā saṃyojanā. Rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga are
collectively called upapattipaṭilābhiyā saṃyojanā, and māna, uddhacca, avijjā are collectively
called bhavapaṭilābhiyā samyojana.
There are many posts on gandhabba: “Mental Body – Gandhabba,” “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma,” and “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya).”
4.8.3 Antarabhava and Gandhabba
Title pronunciation:
WebLink: Listen to Pronunciation: Antarabhava and Gandhabba
1. There are many misinterpretations about the term “antarabhava“. Just two to three hundred years
after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha, Mahayanists started saying that there is an antarabhava,
because they thought gandhabba belonged to an antarabhava.
§ At the Third Buddhist Council, Moggaliputta tissa Thero proved that there is no antarabhava in
a debate with the Mahayanists. That correct interpretation is in the Kathavatthu of the Tipiṭaka.
2. Antarabhava (“antara” + “bhava“, where antara is “in between”) means in between bhava or
existences. For example, when a living being in the human bhava exhausts its kammic energy for that
human existence, it grasps a new existence (bhava) at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment. Suppose the next
existence or bhava is existence as a deer, for this example.
§ The transition from a human existence to an existence as a deer happens in a billionth of a
second from the cuti citta (dying moment in the human bhava) to the paṭisandhi citta (first
thought moment in the existence as a deer).
§ Therefore, indeed there is no antarabhava. The time lapse from the cuti citta to the paṭisandhi
citta is negligibly small; see, “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“. This was the
point made by Moggaliputta tissa Thero at the Third Buddhist Council: there is no
“antarabhava” between the “human bhava” and the “deer bhava” in the above example.
§ Gandhabba is in the same “human bhava” until the kammic energy for the human bhava runs
out (which could be many hundreds of years, compared to about 100 years of lifetime for a
human). In between successive human births within that human bhava, it is the gandhabba that
lives in “para loka“; see, “Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
3. The important point is that bhava and jāti are two different things. That is why in paṭicca
samuppāda there is a step, “bhava paccayā jāti“. There can be many “jāti” or births as a human
within a single human bhava; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births“.
§ Living beings in human and animal realms are not born with fully-formed physical bodies. In
all other 29 realms, beings are born with full-formed bodies, which are called opapātika or
instantaneous births. Thus a deva or brahma is born with fully-formed bodies.
§ This means a deva or brahma will have basically the same body during that bhava, even though
that body will undergo changes.
4. In our example above, a human could have kammic energy supporting that human existence
(bhava) for even thousands of years. However, a physical human body can last only for about 100
years.
§ The kammic energy of a human bhava is not in the physical body (karaja kaya), but is in the
“mental body” or the manomaya kāya or the gandhabba. There is a whole section on the
gandhabba at this site; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“.
§ As explained in the post, “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body“, a gandhabba
will inherit “many physical bodies” during a given human existence.
§ As discussed in the post, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, the
physical body is inert, and it is the gandhabba that “gives life” to that inert body.
5. This is why the death of the physical body does not necessarily mean that there is a cuti citta at that
dying moment of a human; that is true only if it is a “kammakkhaya marana” or death where the
kammic energy is exhausted (“marana” in Pail or Sinhala is for death).
§ But most human deaths are “āyukkhaya marana“, i.e., the end of life for the physical body
(here “āyu” means lifetime); there is still more kammic energy for the human bhava left. There
is no cuti citta at that time. There is no change in the gandhabba at the moment of death of the
physical body.
6. Thus if it is an “āyukkhaya marana“, the gandhabba comes out of that dead body and waits for
another womb. It is extremely unlikely that there will be a matching womb appearing exactly at the
death of a human physical body. In most cases, the gandhabba has to wait months and more likely
years before a matching womb becomes available (gati of the gandhabba have to match those of the
parents).
§ Most deaths due to accidents are not due to “kammakkhaya marana“, i.e., the physical body is
destroyed in an unforeseen way. Such deaths are caused by strong kamma vipāka or via natural
disasters like floods. Then the person in question will be reborn with a new human body. This
is why many rebirths accounts describe death in a previous life due to an accident, murder, etc.
§ Of course one could die with āyukkhaya marana even at old age.
7. Now, the reason that the Mahayanists say that there is an antarabhava is that they believe that the
gandhabba is not human and is a “in between state”.
§ The irony is that many current Theravadins even refuse to believe the EXISTENCE of a
gandhabba, simply because they do not want to be classified as taking the side of the
Mahayanists. They simply believe that when a human dies — and is going to be reborn human
— the second human life is initiated INSTANTANEOUSLY. In other words, the previous
human dies at the cuti moment, and a billionth of a second later appears as a new baby in a
human womb (paṭisandhi).
§ However, that approach leads to many inconsistencies: (i) That kind of timing is an
impossibility. (ii) The step “bhava paccayā jāti” in paṭicca samuppāda does not make sense: Is
that new human birth a new bhava?. (iii) Patisandhi or grasping a new bhava happens within a
thought moment, while birth in the human realm happens via a series of steps described in #8
below. (iv) As discussed in #9 – #11 below, rebirth accounts are also not compatible with
rebirth occurring in the womb. (v) There is more evidence from the Tipiṭaka as discussed in
#12, #13 below.
8. According to the Tipiṭaka, a full-pledged human appears via a series of steps: Jāti, sanjāthi,
okkanthi, abhinibbanthi, khandhānan pātilabho, ayatanan pātilabho. This process is described in
detail in “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body“.
§ Here, jāti is the paṭisandhi moment, when the kammaja kaya for the new bhava is produced in a
thought moment. Moments later, that kammja kaya is augmented by the cittaja kaya and a utuja
kaya and a manomaya kāya (gandhabba) is formed; this is the sanjathi moment. This
gandhabba comes out of the dead body of the previous life (bhava).
§ When that gandhabba goes into a suitable womb, that is the okkanthi moment. This is what is
described as “viññāṇa of a prince or princess descending into a womb” in the suttas. Note that
by the time descending into a womb, the sex is already determined. It is a gandhabba that
descends into the womb.
§ There is no place in the Tipiṭaka that says paṭisandhi happens in a womb. Rather it says, “…
gandhabba okkanthi hoti“.
9. Many rebirth account features can be explained by the correct interpretation where the manomaya
kāya (gandhabba) inherits many successive (but time separated) physical bodies.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
412 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ In rebirth stories, there is always a “time gap” between successive human births (jāti). They are
always separated by several years or at least few years. In between those successive lives, that
lifestream survives as a gandhabba. The Buddha told Vacchagotta that the gandhabba survives
that intervening time by using taṇhā as āhāra. Some gandhabbas can “inhale” aroma from
plants, too.
§ We all know that human existence is extremely difficult to attain; see, “How the Buddha
Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“. If each human birth is categorized as a
“brand new human existence or bhava“, that would be inconsistent since human existence is a
rare event.
10. Then another question may arise, “Why do people look different in successive rebirths?”. That is
because the physical body in each human life (within the same human bhava) arise with contributions
from the parents for that life.
§ Even though the gandhabba brings in his/her gati (habits), āsava (cravings), keles (mental
impurities), etc from the previous life, the physical body for the new life has major
contributions from the parents. In fact, the DNA of the physical bodies of two successive lives
will be very different due to this reason. The building of a new physical body is described in the
post, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
11. Furthermore, even the mental body of the gandhabba WILL change in the next life and thus gathi
(habits), āsava (cravings), keles (mental impurities), etc will also change as one grows up in a new
environment under a different set of influences.
§ For example, one could have lived a moral life in the previous birth, but may be born into a
family of drug addicts due to a bad kamma vipāka. In that case, the new life could drastically
change to an immoral life.
§ However, in most cases, the successive lives are not that drastically different, unless one makes
drastic changes during the life: If one could attain the Sotāpanna stage, then one will not be
born into an immoral family; if one attains the Anāgāmī stage of Nibbāna, then one will never
be born human and will be born in the brahma realm.
§ On the other hand, even if one is born in a moral family but under the influence of bad friends
becomes a drug addict and commits crimes, one is likely to be born into an immoral family in
the next birth. If one commits an ānantariya pāpa kammā (say by killing a parent), then one
will definitely be born in the apāyas at death, even if there is more kammic energy left in the
human bhava.
12. Now, let us discuss more evidence from the Tipiṭaka. During the night of his Enlightenment, the
Buddha (or more accurately the ascetic Siddhartha) first attained the “pubbe nivasanussati ñāṇa“,
before attaining the “cutupapada ñāṇa” and finally the “āsavakkhaya ñāṇa“. It is the āsavakkhaya
ñāṇa that led to the Buddhahood; see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“.
§ The first two knowledges (ñāṇa; pronounced “gnana”;) can be attained even with anariya
jhānas (with limited capabilities). Both those deal with the ability to look back at previous
lives. But with the first one, pubbe nivasanussati ñāṇa, one could only look at previous human
births.
§ Here, “pubbe” means “previous”, “nivasa” means “house”, and “anussati” means “recall”, i.e.,
the knowledge to recall successive residences of a given gandhabba. In a given human bhava, a
gandhabba could have many different “houses”, i.e., physical bodies. Thus with this ñāṇa, one
could look at human births in the past, in multiple human bhava going back to very long times,
depending on the capability of the yogi.
§ The second one, cutupapada ñāṇa, extends the capability to see all previous rebirths in any
realm. Here cutupapada (cuti means death and upapada means birth) refers to all types of
rebirths in various realms (niraya, animal, deva, etc.) in the past.
13. Furthermore, the Buddha described how he saw human gandhabbas moving from one physical
body to the next (in a single human bhava) with the pubbe nivasanussati ñāṇa. He described that with
the following simile: If one is situated in an upper level of a multi-story building (yes, there were
multi-storied buildings at the time of the Buddha) located at a busy junction, one could see people
meandering in the streets below.
§ Some people just stay on the street, sometimes sitting in a bench or standing by the road, etc;
this is analogous to gandhabbas just waiting for a physical body (i.e., a womb).
§ Sometimes, a person enter a house and stays there for a long time; this is comparable to a
gandhabba staying in a physical body for a long time, i.e., until old age.
§ Other times, a person may enter a house and come out after a few hours; this can be compared
to a death at young age.
§ Also, a person could enter a house and immediately come out; this is compared to an abortion
or an unsuccessful pregnancy.
Thus the pubbe nivasanussati ñāṇa is limited to looking at past human lives. This is a good example
that the Buddha clearly stated the concept of the gandhabba. The cutupapada ñāṇa, extends the
capability to see all previous rebirths in any realm.
§ In the Tirokudda sutta, the gandhabba is referred to as a “tirokudda“; see, “Hidden World of
the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
14. Now, if a human dies at end of the kammic energy for the human bhava, then the cuti-paṭisandhi
transition does happen at the moment of the death of the physical body. In the specific example of a
human to deer transition, now a “deer gandhabba” comes out of that dead body and has to wait for a
matching “deer womb” to become available.
§ However, if the human was destined to become a deva, then a fully formed deva will appear
instantaneously in a deva realm the moment the human dies in a kammakkhaya marana. A
gandhabba is involved only in human and animal realms; see, “Gandhabba – Only in Human
and Animal Realms“.
15. Another interesting piece of information comes from how the Buddha (and others with iddhi
bala) traveled to deva or brahma loka with the manomaya kāya (which is the same as gandhabba),
leaving the physical body behind (the physical body does not die in this case, and is kept alive by the
rūpa jivitindriya). Upon returning, the manomaya kāya can re-enter the physical body.
§ Those who attain the fourth jhāna can develop iddhi powers to be able to separate the
manomaya kāya from the physical body and travel far with that manomaya kāya. The Buddha
stated that just as a sword can be pulled out of its sheath, those with iddhi powers can pull the
manomaya kāya out of the physical body.
§ That manomaya kāya can then go to distant places within very short times (this is what is called
“astral travel” in the present day; see the Wikipedia article, “WebLink: Wiki: Astral
projection“. In fact, a gandhabba is the same as an “astral body”.
§ In the suttas it is said that the Buddha visited deva or brahma lokas “within the time that takes a
bent arm to be straightened”.
§ As an aside, it is also possible for some of those with iddhi powers to travel with the physical
body. That involves a different mechanism which is not relevant to this discussion.
16. If you have any other questions or unresolved issues pertaining to this discussion, please send me
a comment. I can add to the post to address such questions.
4.8.4 Ānantariya Kamma – Connection to Gandhabba
June 2, 2018
1. Ānantariya or ānantarika comes from “na” + “an” + “antara“. That rhymes as “ānantara”. There
are many words like this, meanings of which remain unclear to many. Pāli is a phonetic language,
where some meanings can never be found grammatically.
§ Anatta is the negation of “atta” or having refuge/having substance: “na” + “atta” (which
rhymes as “anatta”): there is no substance/does not hold any ultimate truth; see, “Anatta – the
Opposite of Which Atta?“.
§ The word Anāgāmī comes from “na” + “āgāmī” or “not coming back”: “na” + “āgāmī”
rhymes as “anāgāmī”. It means “not coming back to the kama loka”. He/she will attain
Nibbāna from those brahma realms.
§ Words like this cannot be analyzed grammatically. This is why current Pāli experts are wrong
in interpreting such words (and are unable to interpret many key words).
§ By the way, anantara means the opposite of ānantara; see, “Anantara and Samanantara
Paccaya“.
2. Going back to the word “ānantariya“: “An” or “anu” means “food” or “kamma seed” depending on
where it is used. “na” means “not”. “antara” means stored somewhere away. Therefore, ānantariya
means “not stored away to come back when conditions are right”, i.e., it will bring vipāka “right
away”.
§ When one does a kamma that is NOT ānantariya, its kammic energy is “stored away” at
“antara” and can bring suitable kamma vipāka, when suitable CONDITIONS appear. Some
kamma vipāka may not be realized for many lives simply because suitable conditions had not
appeared.
§ However, an ānantariya kamma vipāka SHOULD override any existing other kamma vipāka.
Our life experiences (citta vīthi) ALWAYS start with a kamma vipāka (see, “How Are Paṭicca
Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“). Therefore, an ānantariya kamma vipāka SHOULD BE
enforced right after the kamma is done, even before any other pavutti kamma vipāka (like a
seeing, hearing event) is initiated, i.e., instantaneously. There should be no need for a delay
until the death of the human. [pavutti : happening,proceeding,fate,event]
3. However, an ānantariya kamma will bring vipāka “right away” ONLY in realms other than human
realm (ānantariya kamma are not relevant in the animal realm). In order to see why that is, let us first
look at what types of kamma belong to ānantariya kamma.
§ The BAD ānantariya kamma are five: killing one’s mother, killing one’s father, killing an
Arahant, shedding the blood of a Buddha, creating Saṅgha bheda. [bheda : [m.] breach;
disunion; dissension.]
§ Then, there are several GOOD ānantariya kamma: magga phala (stages of Nibbāna) and
attainment of (Ariya or anāriya) jhānās.
§ Any of these, by definition, should lead to their vipāka right away. However, there is another
factor that comes into play for humans, which we will discuss now.
4. All of the five bad ānantariya kamma are done by humans. Therefore, we need look at the good
ānantariya kamma in order to see how they work in other realms.
§ For example, if a deva attains the Anāgāmī stage, that deva will instantaneously be born in a
rūpāvacara brahma realm. [deva : (lit:the Radiant Ones; related to Lat. deus):heavenly
beings, deities, celestials, are beings who live in happy worlds, and who, as a rule, are invisible
to the human eye. They are subject, however, just like all human and other beings, to ever-
repeated rebirth, old age and death, and thus are not freed from the cycle of existence and from
misery.]
§ If a rūpāvacara brahma attains the Arahant stage, that brahma will instantaneously attain
Parinibbāna, i.e., will cease to exist in the 31 realms.
§ In both those cases, the true meaning of the term ānantariya kamma will be enforced, i.e., the
vipāka will take place without a delay, instantaneously.
5. In the human realm, the enforcement of an ānantariya kamma will be DELAYED due to the
following reason.
§ The primary “body” that is directly subjected to ānantariya kamma vipāka is the kammaja
kaya, the “primary body” created by kamma for that bhava at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment. All
living beings are born with a “mental body” (called “trija kaya” or three bodies) consisting of
the kammaja kaya, cittaja kaya, and utuja kaya.
§ Brahmas only have trija kaya. Even though devas in the six deva realms have a fourth
“physical body” or a “karaja kaya“, that is very fine. Thus, the trija kaya (specifically the
kammaja kaya) of a deva is not shielded sufficiently and any ānantariya kamma vipāka will
take place without a delay.
§ This trija kaya in human and animal realms it is given a special name “gandhabba”.
6. The trija kaya or the gandhabba of a human is shielded by the “dense human physical body”.
Therefore, the instantaneous enforcement of the ānantariya kamma vipāka on the kammaja kaya
cannot take place. It will have to wait until the death of the physical body.
§ When the physical body of a human dies, the trija kaya (which is given the special name
gandhabba) comes out and is no longer shielded by the physical body. At that time, the
ānantariya kamma vipāka will be enforced instantaneously.
§ This is the reason that the term ānantariya kamma vipāka does not apply to a human in the true
sense of ānantariya (no delay).
§ Therefore, the working of ānantariya kamma vipāka cannot be explained without the
concept of gandhabba.
7. Now we can explain many applications of the ānantariya kamma vipāka for humans.
§ On the “bad side”, for example, one can kill a parent or cause Saṅgha bheda and can live a full
life. However, at the death of the physical body, one would be instantaneously born in the
apāyās (even if there is more kammic energy for the current human bhava left).
§ On the “good side”, one attaining a jhāna will be born in the appropriate brahma realm only
after death. One attaining the Anāgāmī stage will be born in the appropriate brahma realm only
after death, and one attaining the Arahant stage would undergo Parinibbāna (i.e., cease to exist
in the 31 realms and immediately get to Nibbāna) only at death.
8. Now, another question may come up regarding the following situation: an Arahant‘s or an
Anāgāmī‘s gandhabba may have to come out of the physical body when performing a supernormal
action (abhiññā). Wouldn’t that gandhabba undergo instantaneous transformation at that time?
§ The answer is no. The reason is that the gandhabba is still firmly connected to the living
physical body (that is they can re-enter that body any time). It is as if the gandhabba is still
protected by the physical body; the shielding is still active.
§ This explanation holds also in the cases of astral projection and out-of-body experiences
(OBE); see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“. In the case of astral
projection or astral travel, it is said that the astral body is kept “attached” to the physical body
by “silver cord”.
9. Now we can address another related issue. There seems to be two issues that may be difficult to
grasp.
§ A LIVING Arahant is subjected to kamma vipāka DURING his/her life.
§ No kamma vipāka will come to an Arahant AFTER his/her death.
10. As we discussed above, a human Arahant will not attain Parinibbāna at the moment of attaining
the Arahanthood, because of the presence of human physical body. Thus, a human Arahant has to
wait until the death of the physical body to attain Parinibbāna.
§ Now, attaining a magga phala does NOT mean the removal of kammic energies for
previous kamma (see below). Therefore, those kamma vipāka will be still effective for the
Arahant until death.
§ This is why even the Buddha had to suffer from an injury to his toe, had back problems, and
also had pains after the last meal.
11. There could many more kamma vipāka left for an Arahant at the time of death. However, at
death, the gandhabba comes out of the dead body and will instantaneously disappear from the 31
realms of this world, i.e., attain Parinibbāna.
§ Therefore, any remaining kamma vipāka will NEVER be able to materialize. They are said to
have become “ahosi kamma“, or “ineffective kamma“.
§ So, now we have answers to the two questions raised in #9 above.
12. However, some kamma vipāka other than an ānantariya kamma vipāka will be overcome by
attaining a magga phala (at least the Sotāpanna stage), i.e., some kamma vipāka will become ahosi
kamma. Of course, all kamma vipāka will become ahosi kamma at Parinibbāna.
§ Let us discuss how some kamma vipāka can become ahosi kamma upon attaining stages of
magga phala.
§ In order to do that we need first to discuss what happens at the Arahant stage.
13. One attains the final stage of Nibbāna (Arahanthood), not by removing or exhausting all kamma
vipāka from the past.
§ One attains the Arahanthood by cultivating one’s paññā (wisdom) to the level where one truly
understands the real nature of this world. At that point one’s mind will not be tempted by
ANY desire (taṇhā) to be born ANYWHERE in the 31 realms. That is a CRITICAL POINT
to understand.
§ Now when the gandhabba comes out of the dead body of an Arahant, it immediately undergoes
the cuti (separation from the human bhava), due to the ānantariya kamma vipāka associated
with the Arahant phala.
§ But now, that lifestream CANNOT grasp a new bhava (paṭisandhi) anywhere in the 31 realms
since there is no “upādāna” in the step of “upādāna paccayā bhava” in the Paṭicca Samuppada
process. This is because there is no taṇhā left for any existence in the 31 realms and thus
“taṇhā paccayā upādāna” step will not happen.
14. Therefore, even though there are many good and bad kamma vipāka may be associated with that
Arahant, all those will have become “ahosi kamma” (are not able to bring out vipāka), simply
because one has lost ALL cravings (taṇhā).
§ This is why Angulimala became free of the apāyās, even though he killed 999 people. That was
not an ānantariya kamma. Only those kamma listed in #3 above are ānantariya kamma.
15. However, in the case of the death of an Anāgāmī, the gandhabba comes out, undergoes cuti, but
can grasp a bhava in the rūpāvacara brahma realms reserved for the Anāgāmīs. Therefore, a cuti-
paṭisandhi transition takes place leading to the rebirth in such a realm.
§ But an Anāgāmī‘s mind would not grasp a bhava anywhere in the kāmāvacara realms, since
he/she has lost all “upādāna” (tied to cravings via taṇhā) for such realms. Therefore, any
previous kamma vipāka that could have led to a rebirth in the lower realms will have become
ahosi kamma.
16. In the same way, a Sotāpanna’s mind would not grasp a bhava in the apāyās. Any “apāyagami
kamma” he/she had done have now become “ahosi kamma“. If one has “apāyagami kamma vipāka”
waiting to bear fruit (as almost all normal humans do), attaining the Sotāpanna stage will
OVERRIDE those kamma vipāka.
§ To put it in another way: at the dying moment, a Sotāpanna WILL NOT grasp (upādāna) a
birth in the apāyās. His/her mindset has PERMANENTLY changed. Therefore, such kamma
vipāka will NEVER materialize even in future lives for a Sotāpanna.
§ His/her diṭṭhi anusaya and diṭṭhāsava have been permanently removed, and the three
samyojanā that binds one to the apāyās have been cut off; these terms describe the Sotāpanna
attainment in different ways; see below.
17. Even though one who attained an anāriya jhāna would grasp a bhava in the appropriate brahma
realm, that is just for that particular cuti-paṭisandhi transition.
§ Since he/she had not attained a magga phala (and thus has not “seen” the futility/danger of
“apāyagami actions”), a birth in the apāyās can happen in the future.
§ One with an anāriya jhāna has only SUPPRESSED cravings for kāma loka, but such cravings
remain as anusaya: One has not not removed avijjā to the level of truly realizing the dangers
of kāma rāga, by comprehending Tilakkhaṇa. Thus, kāma rāga anusaya remains together with
kāmāsava, and one has not broken through the kāma rāga samyojanā. These terms are
explained in, “Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava” and “Dasa Samyojana – Bonds in Rebirth
Process“.
18. Therefore, ultimately it is the true understanding of Tilakkhaṇa at various levels that lead to
various magga phala.
§ However, understanding of Tilakkhaṇa is possible only for one who has cultivated the mundane
eightfold path, via discarding ALL 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. [See the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi
at Mahā Chattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty), Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and
Sotāpanna Stage, Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala), and Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold
Paths, and Samadhi] [WebLink: suttacentral: 62 views at WebLink: suttacentral: Brahmajala
Sutta]
§ To put it another way, attaining magga phala at various stages is associated with getting rid of
dasa akusala at various levels.
§ Micchā diṭṭhi is the worst of the dasa akusala, and at the root of micchā diṭṭhi is are the 10
types of micchā diṭṭhi. The second level of micchā diṭṭhi is removed with the comprehension of
Tilakkhaṇa (that is when one starts on the Noble Eightfold Path).
§ All wrong views (diṭṭhi) are removed when one attains the Arahanthood. When all wrong views
are removed, all other nine akusala are prevented. However, abstaining from other dasa
akusala is necessary to remove wrong views, so they are all inter-connected.
§ I keep repeating this, but I am not sure how many pay attention to these basic facts. Many
people seem to waste time trying to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa, before getting rid of the 10
types of micchā diṭṭhi.
February 5, 2017
1. The idea of a mental body controlling the physical body was discussed in the previous post in this
section (“Our Mental Body – Gandhabba“), and the details are discussed in many other posts; see,
“Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“.
By the way, mental body is not all mental. It has a fine material component at suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] level; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)- Introduction“.
§ There are many reported instances of this mental body coming out of the physical body, and I
have mentioned some of those in other posts. But I would like to have some of that evidence in
one place, so that one can get an idea of why it is not an alien concept.
§ But there are many made-up stories too. So, my advice is not to get carried away too much
about watching these youtube videos. That is a waste of time. I just wanted to provide some
idea that mental body (gandhabba) is real.
§ The evidence come in three general types of accounts, as we discuss below.
2. Many people have at least briefly experienced an “out-of-body experience” (OBE), where the
mental body just comes out of the physical body, and one see one’s own physical body from above.
§ In his book, “Travels”, famous author of the Jurassic Park, Michael Crichton (1988, p. 307)
mentions his ability to “shift my awareness out of my body and move it around the bedroom”,
and he says, “..I didn’t think anything about it… I assumed that anybody could do it..”.
§ A similar account has been given by a woman recently who also thought that “everybody could
do it”: WebLink: ABCNews: Woman Has ‘Out of Body’ Experiences Whenever She Wants
§ Robert Monroe (see #6 below) says mental bodies of most of us come out and wander around
even without us realizing it. Sometimes, we are in a dream state (we believe) and then feel a
“sudden fall” and wake up. He says this “dream state” is actually the mental body wandering
around and we feel the “sudden fall” when the mental body re-enters the physical body.
§ So it is not correct to assume that a gandhabba or the mental body as a “ghost”. In a
sense, it is a better representation of us than our physical bodies that are discarded after
about 100 years, because it may live for many hundreds of years until the kammic energy
for this human bhava is exhausted.
3. There are other — more dramatic — reported cases of OBE and some of them involve “near death
experiences” (NDE), where the person was presumed to be dead but revived later on. During that
time, the mental body usually “went through a tunnel” to another dimension, but then came back to
re-enter the body.
§ Of course there are many books written on OBE and NDE. “Consciousness Beyond Life”, by
Pim van Lommel (2010) gives detailed accounts of case studies of OBE and NDE experienced
by people undergoing heart operations, some of whom were declared dead, but came back to
life.
§ A third category involves the rebirth accounts from children, who were killed in an accident in
the previous life. They can recall that incident from the previous life, where the mental body
came out of a physical body and they watched the accident scene from above. They have
provided accurate accounts of that scene. I will discuss one such account at the end of the post.
4. The experiences described in the accounts below need to be evaluated with the following nuances
(subtle aspects) in mind. Once the mental body comes out, first it can be an exhilarating experience to
be free of the heavy physical body. So, most people describe it as a “liberating experience”.
§ However, without the physical body, one cannot enjoy smells (in many cases), taste of food,
and also bodily pleasures. Thus, if one had to live without a physical body for a long-time, one
could become frustrated, and one could suffer. This is the status of a gandhabba in between two
consecutive human births.
§ Therefore, even though it could be an “liberating experience” to come out from the shackles of
the physical body for a short time as in OBE and NDE, it may not be that pleasant to stay in
that state state if one has not given up the desire for sensual pleasures, since one cannot “enjoy”
sense pleasures without a physical body.
5. The other point to keep in mind is that many experiences (especially those from the Western
world) are from people who have other religious backgrounds. In a way, this is good because we can
get an unbiased opinion. But, unfortunately they have a different bias due to their own religious
beliefs. For example, many people say they visited heaven, which in reality could be a “good
locality” of the gandhabbas.
§ It must be kept in mind that gandhabba world is not just “one place”, even though physical
locations cannot be assigned. It is much better to say that “good gandhabbas” with higher
moral values hang out together (such localities may be referred to as “heaven”), and “bad
gandhabbas” segregate away from those. And there can be many varieties in between.
§ It is similar to the case of people with similar gathi hanging together.
§ So, it can be thought of as there being many “gandhabbas worlds” in the nether world or para
loka.
§ Some of the gandhabbas have very fine bodies, but others may have more dense bodies (still
much less dense than our bodies). Some may “look” like humans, but some may have started
already transforming to animal forms (due to types saṅkhāra they cultivate) and may look half
human and half animal. It is a very complex world.
6. Robert Monroe has written several books about the OBE experiences of himself and others. Two of
his books are: “Journeys Out of the Body: The Classic Work on Out-of-Body Experience” and “Far
Journeys”.
§ Here is how he describes his first OBE experience (there are many other youtube videos on his
accounts):
WebLink: Youtube: Robert Monroe explains his first OOBE
7. The following video is on a case of OBE during brain surgery. Even though the gandhabba or the
mental body normally comes out during heart operations and not during brain operations, in this case
the heart was stressed because this particular operation involved cooling the heart to extremely low
temperatures.
WebLink: YouTube: Pam Reynolds: NBC interview about her Near-Death Experience
8. Here is an interesting documentary, “Beyond Our Sight – documentary”. Thanks to Mr. Johnny
Lim from Singapore for sending me this video.
WebLink: YouTube: Beyond Our Sight - documentary (52')
9. In their book, “Soul Survivor: The Reincarnation of a World War II Fighter Pilot”, by Bruce and
Andrea Leininger detail the amazing story of their son’s recount of a past life, mentioned in the above
video. There the little boy vividly describes how he died in his previous life. This falls into the third
category that I mentioned in #1 above. Here is a ABC News report on the story:
WebLink: YouTube: Reincarnation - Airplane Boy (abc Primetime)
§ Another youtube video link was sent to me by a reader from Sri Lanka who did not want to be
identified. This video is in Sinhala, and is the account of a boy. This boy was an adult in the
previous life and was killed in an accident. He describes how his mental body came out of the
dead body and how he watched from above the scene of the accident.
§ The actual account starts at 3 minutes into the video.
WebLink: YouTube: wenasa (Video not avaliable 21 August 2018)
Several years later (during which time he was in the gandhabba world or para loka), he was born to a
family in a different village in Sri Lanka.
§ As is evident from the above two stories, successive births within a given bhava are likely to
be– but not always — in similar geographic regions because of the tendency to match one’s
gathi.
10. Some scientists believe that these are mind-made hallucinations. Here is a researcher’s account of
his investigations into that possibility. He started the project to prove that it is a hallucination, but
ended up convincing himself otherwise.
WebLink: YouTube: Larry King Interview with Melvin Morse
11. Finally, there are some trying to make money saying they can teach how to do “astral projection”.
Astral projection is another name for OBE.
§ This is not something that can be taught. So, don’t waste money.
§ The only way to do it systematically is to cultivate Ariya or anariya jhānas to the fourth jhāna.
Then one can practice further and learn how to remove the mental body from the physical. The
Buddha compared this to removing a sword from its sheath.
§ However, most people who can naturally do it get it as a sansāric habit. They are likely to have
cultivated jhānas and developed abhiññā powers in recent past lives.
§ The most common situation is when the mental body just pops out of the physical body in
highly stressful situations where the stress is affecting the heart. The hadaya vatthu of the
gandhabba overlaps the physical heart, and thus when the heart is stressed out, gandhabba may
just pop out of the physical body.
4.8.6 Abnormal Births Due to Gandhabba Transformations
1. Modern science and technology, especially the internet, is a very useful resource to understand and
confirm some concepts in Buddha Dhamma. All of us can now access rare events in remote places,
that we would never have known without the internet.
§ I started thinking about this post when I received a youtube video of a “strange looking animal”
sent to me by Mr. Tobias Große from Germany. Then I did a Google search and found that there
are many such “abnormal” human and animal birth reports from all over the world.
§ Such observations can be explained with the concept of gandhabba, which is an essential concept
for describing the life in the human and animal realms. I have two sub-sections at the website
devoted to the important concept of gandhabba: “Mental Body – Gandhabba” and “Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya)“.
§ Of course, gandhabba is NOT a Mahayana concept, see, “Gandhabba State – Evidence from
Tipiṭaka“, and without that there will be many inconsistencies, including the observed fact that
there are gaps of several years in between successive human rebirths; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States
of Existence and Births Therein“.
2. As we have discussed in those posts, a human bhava (existence) could last for many hundreds or
even thousand of years. Within that time, one could be born with a human body many times. When
one is born with a human body and when that “physical body” dies, the “mental body” or the
gandhabba state could have many hundreds of years of life left.
§ Thus, unless the kammic energy for that “human bhava” has been exhausted, the mental body
(gandhabba) comes of the dead physical body unharmed. Since we cannot see that very fine
body, it is said that the gandhabba lives in “paralowa” (other world, sometime called nether
world), compared to “this world” that we can see.
§ That gandhabba has to wait for a suitable womb to become available, and at that time it is
pulled into that “matching womb”. This is why there is normally a gap of several years exists in
between successive rebirths per rebirth stories; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
3. During one’s lifetime, the kammaja kaya of the gandhabba changes, and sometimes those changes
can be drastic. If one kills a parent, that kammaja kaya does not change instantly only because it is
“enclosed” in the dense physical body.
§ But when the physical body dies, the gandhabba is automatically kicked out of that body, and
will instantly transform to a kamma kaya suitable for a being in an apāya. Therefore, even if the
original gandhabba had more kammic energy left for the human bhava, a cuti-paṭisandhi to a
“hell being” will occur, and he/she will be instantly born in an apāya.
§ There are such anantariya kamma that can instantly lead to births in rūpa and arūpa loka: If
one had cultivated jhāna, then when the gandhabba comes out of the dead body, it will
instantly undergo a cuti-paṭisandhi transition to a brahma and will be born instantly in the
corresponding brahma realm.
4. Sometimes, a human gandhabba starts making the transformation to another bhava while in the
gandhabba state after coming out of a dead body. This happens especially for those who are engaged
in highly immoral deeds.
§ For example, if one is cultivating “animal gati” (thinking and behaving like an animal), then the
gandhabba will continue to generate such “animal saṅkhāra” after coming out of the dead
body, and may gradually transform to an animal while in the gandhabba state. Then, if a
matching animal womb comes available, that half-human creature will be pulled into that
womb.
§ Now, by “matching womb” what is meant is the mental state of the mother at that time. She
could be a “good moral person”, but if for some reason her mental state at that time became
“abnormal”, then it could become a matching womb for that creature, who could be half human,
half animal.
§ Depending on how far that transformation had taken place, that gandhabba could be pulled into
a human womb or an animal womb, i.e., be born to a human or animal mother. Here is the
video sent to me by Mr. Tobias Große from an animal birth that looks partly human:
WebLink: gmx.net: Halb Mensch, halb Tier: Kuh sieht aus wie Fabelwesen
5. The following are some more examples of (both abnormal human and animal births) available as
youtube videos (of course, in some cases “photoshop” may have been used; there are many on the
internet and I have picked a couple that appear to be genuine):
WebLink: Youtube: Half Animal Half Human Found In Real Life
WebLink: Youtube: South African Sheep Births Half Human Half Beast (Video not avaliable
21 August 2018)
§ Here is more information on the above “beast”:
WebLink: Youtube: HALF HUMAN-HALF BEAST CREATURE SENT BY THE DEVIL
§ Thanks to Mr. C. Saket from India for the following video. Some abnormalities shown there
could also be due to gandhabba transformation together with bad kamma vipāka:
WebLink: Youtube: 10 REAL People With Shocking Genetic Mutations
§ Please send me any good videos that you come across, so that I can add them to this collection.
6. Anything and everything in this world happens due to a cause, or more correctly due to multiple
causes. The foundation of science is causes and effects. If things happen arbitrarily, then there is no
way to predict the outcome of a scientific experiment.
§ But modern science deals mainly with the properties of material objects. Also, material objects
only have a short “history”; a building or a car is assembled and eventually destroyed. Thus it is
easier to see the link between causes and effects.
§ But living beings have minds and each living being has a past that extends to the deep past (due
to rebirth). So, the causes that bring about results now, may have been done in the deep past.
That is why it is hard to see the connection between causes and effects for living beings.
7. My late Noble teacher, Waharaka Thero, has mentioned in several desanās how he saw such
“gandhabba transformations” while in samādhi.
§ When an immoral human dies, the gandhabba that comes out will keep cultivating those “bad
saṅkhāra“, and if they get strong enough the fine body of the gandhabba will start changing to
match those “saṅkhāra” and thus “gati“; see, “Gati and Bhava – Many Varieties” and “Gati to
Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“.
§ For example, he had seen how a human gandhabba transforms to a bird. It started with the head
getting longer and forming a beak. The rest of the body then changed gradually from top to
bottom. When I heard that, those Egyptian pictures seen on pyramids of “bird men” with bird
heads immediately came to my mind.
8. By the way, even some normal people can see those gandhabbas with fine bodies; this is due to
“puñña iddhi” due to some past good kamma.
§ There are different types of “puñña iddhi“. Surviving without food and water is known as
“breatharianism” and has been documented or claimed by many. an extreme case of a Hindu
yogi, Prahlad Jani, is baffling to many modern scientists:
WebLink: Youtube: Snippet from "IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS LIGHT" - Yogi
Prahlad Jani
§ Thanks again to Mr. C. Saket for sending this video and the related comments above.
§ The ability to have very detailed memories from this life is also such a “puñña iddhi“, see,
“Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)”, where a woman describes her
memories from this life going back to many years. The level of detail she can remember is
amazing.
§ In fact, I am beginning to believe that in those early Buddhist Councils (Sangāyana), where
Arahants recited the whole Tipiṭaka, they were likely to have VERIFIED then by actually re-
visiting each sutta‘s delivery by iddhi power. When you listen to the woman describing past
events in such detail, it is as if she is re-visiting that event.
§ The ability of some people to see gandhabbas with fine bodies could be responsible for the
misty “ghost figures” like the ones that we see in popular culture (in books, movies and on the
internet).
9. A human gandhabba is a finer version of a human. When a human, say a middle aged person dies,
the gandhabba that comes out looks very similar to that person (if one can see it). Then with time it
will show normal changes that could be expected of a human: His hair and fingernails will grow, for
example. In a few years, that gandhabba WILL look like ghost with long hair and long finger nails.
Imagine what will happen to one’s human body if one doesn’t cut one’s hair, finger nails, or
shave. One will look like a ghost. That is why some gandhabbas look like ghosts, according to
Waharaka Thero.
§ Some of them get a bit denser by inhaling aroma and may become easier to see for those people
with “puñña iddhi” that we mentioned earlier. However, when that gandhabba is pulled into a
womb, it will shed all “added” mass (utuja kaya), and only the basic “kammaja kaya” with the
hadaya vatthu and the pasāda rūpa (combined to be smaller than an atom in modern science)
will merge with the zygote (the single cell formed by the union of mother and father) that is in
the womb.
§ Now that “new baby” will have a different body than the body in the previous life, because it
have many features inherited from the parents (via DNA) in the zygote.
§ But it is essentially the evolved kammaja kaya formed at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment that is still
there for that next “birth” in the human world. Thus while the gandhabba keep its kammaja
kaya, but the physical body will be influenced by the parents.
§ This is discussed in detail in, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth
Control?“.
This world is much more complex than we realize, and the “paralowa” of the gandhabbas is even
more complex; see “Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
1. As we have discussed in this subsection and elsewhere at the site, we have two bodies: the physical
body (karaja kāya) and mental body (gandhabba). Both these bodies need food to survive.
§ The food we eat to sustain the physical body is called kabalinkā āhāra.
§ Our mental body consumes three more types of food: phassa, mano sancetana, and viññāṇa.
§ The four types of food are called “satara āhāra“. We will see that all four can be food for the
mental body (gandhabba).
2. Food is essential for all living beings. If one stops taking kabalinkā āhāra (which includes water)
for about seven days or so, one’s physical body will die.
§ However, unless one is an Arahant, one will be reborn somewhere in the 31 realms upon death,
because one’s mental body (gandhabba) will not die.
§ We cannot stop suffering by committing suicide, i.e., via the death of the physical body. The
mental body needs to die in order to stop the rebirth process.
3. If one can stop giving food to the mental body for seven days, it will die, and one will never be
reborn anywhere in the 31 realms, i.e., one will attain Nibbāna; then that Arahant will not be reborn
upon death of the physical body. Thus the unimaginable suffering associated with the rebirth process
will be over (as I discussed in the beginning of this section on “Living Dhamma“, stopping the
rebirth process seems scary and it should not be contemplated when one is starting on the
Path) .
§ This is why in the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, the Buddha said that if one can practice the sutta
without making any mistakes, one will attain Nibbāna in seven days.
§ Let us discuss how this is possible.
4. There are two conditions that must be satisfied to generate a new mental body at the cuti-
paṭisandhi moment: (i) There must be a kamma beeja available to grasp, and (ii) one’s mind must
willingly grasp that kamma beeja.
§ We all have accumulated numerous kamma beeja, so the first condition is always satisfied for
anyone. Therefore, it is the second condition — grasping a new existence (bhava) at the cuti-
paṭisandhi moment that can stop the rebirth process.
§ At the beginning, we need to just focus on not grasping a bhava in the four lowest realms
(apāyas).
§ As we have discussed before, this grasping of a new bhava is not done consciously, but
automatically.
§ For example, a Sotāpanna‘s mind will not grasp a bhava in the apāyas; A Sakadāgāmī‘s mind
will not grasp a human bhava in addition, an Anāgāmī will not grasp a bhava in the kāma loka,
and an Arahant will not grasp any.
5. There is another way to look at this mechanism of grasping a new bhava at the cuti-paṭisandhi
moment. In the uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda (PS) cycle, a certain bhava is grasped at “upādāna
paccayā bhava“.
§ When we trace the cycle backwards, we see that it starts at “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” and
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“.
§ The grasping (upādāna) happens only if that PS starts with avijjā and generates an appropriate
viññāṇa for grasping that bhava.
6. Therefore, it is important to realize the two roles that viññāṇa play. We can understand this by
examining how a Sotāpanna avoids birth in the apāyas.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
424 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
(i) If one cultivates “apayagami viññāṇa” by doing extremely hateful/greedy actions, viññāṇa will
keep GENRERATING kamma beeja (energy) that fuel a new bhava in the apāyas. When one attains
the Sotāpanna stage, one will automatically stop generating any more such kamma beeja, but those
ones that had been created will be there.
(ii) However, after someone attains the Sotāpanna stage, his/her mind will not start a uppatti PS cycle
with an apayagami viññāṇa, because that level of avijjā has been removed. That type of viññāṇa has
been “killed” or removed from her mind and is no longer able to grasp a new bhava in the apāyas,
even though apayagami kamma beeja will still be there.
7. A good example from the Tipiṭaka is Ven. Angulimala. He killed almost 1000 people and
definitely had accumulated enough strong kamma beeja to be born in the apāyas.
§ But at death his mind was devoid of that kind of bad viññāṇa to grasp any type of bhava in the
31 realms. Therefore, he was not reborn anywhere in the 31 realms.
8. Therefore, the word viññāṇa represents much more than just consciousness: It can be “food” for
accumulating new kamma beeja AND also “food” or “fuel” that leads to grasping a new bhava.
§ Viññāṇa is opposite of ñāṇa (pronounced “gnana”) or wisdom. When one cultivates ñāṇa,
one’s avijjā is reduced and certain types of viññāṇa are concomitantly reduced.
§ Pronunciation of viññāṇa:
WebLink: Pronunciation of Viññāṇa
§ Pronunciation of ñāṇa:
WebLink: Pronunciation of ñāṇa
§ There are many types of viññāṇa; see, “2. Viññāṇa (Consciousness) can be of Many Different
Types and Forms“.
§ As one attains the four stages of Nibbāna, avijjā is removed in four stages and the strength of
all types of viññāṇa are accordingly reduced (removed) and all are eventually removed at the
Arahant stage.
§ This pure level of consciousness — without any defilements and thus any cravings — is called
pabhasvara citta; see, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
§ In other words, an Arahant can experience the world with a purified mind that is not blemished
by even a trace of greed, hate, or ignorance. Therefore, at death, his purified mind will not
grasp any existence (bhava).
9. As long as one has viññāṇa, one will be born somewhere in the 31 realms. This is why viññāṇa is
called a type of food for the mental body.
§ As one proceeds at successive stages of Nibbāna, one will crave for less and less things in this
world. For example, at the Anāgāmī stage, one would have lost all cravings (and hopes) — or
viññāṇa — for any type of sensual pleasures.
§ It must be noted that the birth in the apāyas is not due to cravings to be willingly born there (no
one has such cravings), but due to immoral deeds one one had done to enjoy sensual pleasures
AND has not yet removed that mentality (desire to enjoy sense pleasures at any cost) or bad
viññāṇa.
10. Any type of viññāṇa is cultivated by thinking, speaking, and acting in such a manner. Thinking,
speaking, and acting is done based on mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra which arise due to sancetana
(“san” + “cetana” or defiled intentions; cetana is pronounced “chethanā”).
§ For example, an alcoholic regularly thinks about drinking, likes to speak about it and likes to
drink. The more he does those, the more that viññāṇa will grow.
§ It is easy to see how a gambler, smoker, etc grow their corresponding viññāṇa the same way.
§ Having such viññāṇa can lead to other immoral activities and corresponding viññāṇa, say
tendency to lie, steal, and even murder.
§ Therefore, all activities done in cultivating such viññāṇa are based on mano sancetana. That is
why mano sancetana are also food for the mental body.
11. The triggers for such sancetana are sense contacts or phassa. These are not mere sense contacts,
but those that give rise to “samphassa ja vedanā“.
§ Phassa is a sense contact. When one just looks at something that is phassa. But if one looks at
it with greed or hate (and ignorance) in mind, that is samphassa (“san” + “phassa“); see,
“Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
§ This is why sense contacts or phassa (more precisely samphassa) are food for the mental body.
Such sense contacts can lead to thoughts about bad actions and can give rise to future kammaja
kāya.
§ Therefore, one needs to avoid sense contacts with sense objects that one has taṇhā for. We need
to remember that taṇhā is attachment to something via greed or hate; see, “Taṇhā – How We
Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
§ So, it is a bad idea for a gambler to visit casinos, an alcoholic to make visits to bars, etc.
Furthermore, one needs to avoid friends who encourage such activities too.
§It is best to avoid any type of contacts that can lead to sense exposures that provide “food” for
the mental body, i.e, get us started thinking about those bad activities.
12. Now we can see how those three types of food act in sequence to feed the mental body: Sense
contacts (phassa) can lead to mano sancetana, which in turn cultivate viññāṇa.
§ Such sense contacts (samphassa) automatically start mano saṅkhāra; then we start thinking and
speaking about those favorite activities, i.e., we start vacī saṅkhāra (consciously think about
them and even speaking about them). Then when the feelings get strong, we will start doing
them (using kāya saṅkhāra).
§ It is important to realize that mano saṅkhāra, vacī saṅkhāra, and kāya saṅkhāra are all
generated in the mind: Vacī saṅkhāra are conscious thoughts that can lead to speech; kāya
saṅkhāra are conscious thoughts that move the physical body.
§ All three types of saṅkhāra arise due to mano sancetana. We cannot think, speak or do things
without generating appropriate mano sancetana.
13. As we discussed before, the physical body is just a shell; it is controlled by the mental body
(gandhabba).
§ Sense contacts come through the physical body. When we get attached to them, we generate
mano sancetana and think, speak, and act accordingly, generating various types of viññāṇa.
§ Kabalinka āhāra or the food that we eat are experienced through one of the six sense contacts
(tongue or jivha pasada). If we eat food with greed, that also lead to mano sancetana and
corresponding “greedy viññāṇa“. Therefore, kabalinkā āhāra can also be a food for the mental
body. More details can be found at “Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“.
§ That is why all four types can be food for the mental body.
A deeper discussion on the four types of food (āhāra) is in the post, “Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya
Ñāṇa“.
Next, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“,..
4.8.8 Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage
§ In this post, we focus on the para loka and gandhabba because many Theravadins incorrectly
assume that gandhabba is a Mahayana concept.
The Ten Types of Micchā Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views)
3. The 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi are listed in many suttas, including the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā
Cattarisaka Sutta and Pathama Niraya Sagga Sutta (WebLink: suttacentral: Anguttara Nikāya: AN
10.211): “Natthi dinnaṃ, natthi yiṭṭhaṃ, natthi hutaṃ, natthi sukatadukkaṭānaṃ kammānaṃ phalaṃ
vipāko, natthi ayaṃ loko, natthi paro loko, natthi mātā, natthi pitā, natthi sattā opapātikā, natthi loke
samaṇabrāhmaṇā sammaggatā sammāpaṭipannā ye imañca lokaṃ parañca lokaṃ sayaṃ abhiññā
sacchikatvā pavedentī’ti“. Translated, the wrong views are:
§ Giving (dāna) has no merits
§ being grateful and responding in kind (for what others have done for oneself) has no merits
§ respecting and making offerings to those with higher virtues has no merits
§ what we enjoy/suffer in this life is not due to kamma vipāka but they “just happen”
§ this world does not exist
§ para loka or the world of gandhabba does not exist
§ there is no special person as a mother
§ no special person as a father
§ there are no opapātika (instantaneous) births
§ there are no Samana brahmana (basically Ariyas or yogis) with abhiññā powers who can see
both this world (imanca lokam) and para loka (paranca lokam)
Micchā Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views) About the Gandhabba
4. I have highlighted three types of micchā diṭṭhi that are common. They are somewhat inter-related.
But the one about the gandhabba is a common micchā diṭṭhi. Even those who believe themselves to
be “devout Buddhists” seem to have that wrong view. They believe that the Buddha did not teach
about gandhabba or the para loka.
§ There is WebLink: suttcentral: Tirokuṭṭa petavatthu in the Petavatthu in the Khuddaka Nikāya
(KN). This has been translated to English (not very good), but one can get the idea: WebLink:
accesstoinsight: Tirokudda Kanda: Hungry Shades Outside the Walls.
§ Also see, “Antarabhava and Gandhabba“.
5. In many suttas, including WebLink: suttcentral: Mahāsaccaka Sutta and WebLink: suttcentral:
Bodhirājakumāra Sutta the Buddha described how he saw human gandhabbas moving from one
physical body to the next (in a single human bhava) with the Pubbenivasanussati Ñāṇa on the night
he attained the Buddhahood.
§ While Ariyas with jhānas can attain both the Pubbenivasanussati Ñāṇa (about previous human
rebirths) and the Cutupapada Ñana (about past births in all realms), other yogis can mostly
acquire only the first one, i.e., they can see only their previous human births. Note that this is
related to the last type of micchā diṭṭhi, i.e., to believe that no such Ariyas or yogis exist.
§ In the sutta links above, the Pāli version is correct but English and Sinhala translations are not
correct, because there is no distinction made between the Pubbenivasanussati Ñāṇa and the
Cutupapada Ñāṇa. With the first Ñāṇa, one can see previous human births and the with the
second, one can see previous births in all 31 realms.
§ By the way, hereafter I will try to provide sutta references at the WebLink: suttcentral:
SuttaCentral site. They have not only the Pāli version, but also translations in different
languages. However, it must be kept in mind that some translations are incorrect, as
mentioned above and also with the translations of anicca and anatta.
8. So, I hope one can understand the fact that one still has micchā diṭṭhi if one adamantly rejects
the concept of gandhabba, or the concept of opapatika births.
§ If one has any one of the ten micchā diṭṭhi, one is not yet on even the mundane Eightfold
Path ; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and the post referred to in that chart, “What is
Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
§ The Buddha discussed this clearly in the “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great
Forty)“.
It is a Step-by-Step Process
9. In order to get to the Sotāpanna stage, the first step is to make sure that one learns Dhamma and
clear up any remaining doubts about those ten types of micchā diṭṭhi.
§ When one gets rid of all ten micchā diṭṭhi, then one is truly on the mundane Eightfold Path.
§ At that point, one’s mind been cleansed to a stage where one can comprehend deeper Dhamma
concepts. In particular, the Three Characteristics of Nature (Tilakkhaṇa): anicca, dukkha,
anatta. This is a deeper micchā diṭṭhi, the second type described in the Mahā Cattarisaka Sutta.
§ When one comprehends the Tilakkhaṇa to some extent, one attains the Sotāpanna stage of
Nibbāna. That is when one gets to the Lokuttara (Noble) Eightfold Path.
§ Then, by following the Noble Eightfold Path one reaches the higher stages of Nibbāna,
culminating at the Arahant stage.
10. The Path to Nibbāna has been covered for hundreds of years due to fact that the above steps
have not been clear. Furthermore, the meanings of those keywords, anicca, dukkha, anatta have
been distorted.
§ That slow process of degradation of Buddha Dhamma took place over about 1500 years. In the
late 1800’s when the Europeans discovered the ancient Sanskrit and Pāli documents, they did
more damage.
§ They first discovered Sanskrit Hindu Vedic literature in India (Buddhism had disappeared from
India long before that), and later came across the Pāli Tipiṭaka in Sri Lanka, Burma, and other
Asian countries.
§ The key problem arose when they ASSUMED that Sanskrit words “anitya” and “anātma” are
the same as the Pāli words “anicca” and “anatta“. The Sanskrit words “anitya” and
“anātma” do mean “impermanent’ and “no-self”, but the Pāli words “anicca” and
“anatta” have totally different meanings. See, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by
Early European Scholars.”
More Information
11. That historical background is fully explained in many posts at the “Historical Background”
section. But at least read the posts starting with “Incorrect Theravāda Interpretations – Historical
Timeline“.
§ The correct meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta have been discussed in the section, “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta“.
12. As for the instantaneous births, instances of such opapātika births occur in many suttas. For
example, in the WebLink: suttcentral: Mahā Parinibbāna Sutta, the Buddha told Ven. Ānanda about
opapātika births of many people who died in a certain village: “..Nandā, ānanda, bhikkhunī
pañcannaṃ orambhāgiyānaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ parikkhayā opapātikā tattha parinibbāyinī
anāvattidhammā tasmā lokā..”
§ As I mentioned, the translations are available in several languages in the above SuttaCentral
link for the sutta. For example, the above verse is translated into English as “..The nun Nandā,
Ānanda, through the complete destruction of the five lower fetters has arisen spontaneously in
the Brahmā worlds, and will attain Final Emancipation there, without returning from that
world..”.
§ In Sinhala as: “..ආනන්දය, නන්දා නම් භික්ෂුණිය පස් ආකාර ඔරම්භාගිය (සත්වයන්
කාමල ොකයෙහි රඳවන) සංය ෝජනයන් නැතිකිරීම නිසා ඔපපාතිකව (බ්රහ්මල ොකයෙහි)
උපන්නීය. ඒ (බ ්රහ්ම) ල ොකයෙන් වෙනස් න ොවන ස්වභාව ඇත්තේඑහිදීම පිරිනිවන් පාන්නීය..”.
§ However, please keep in mind that those SuttaCentral translations also can have errors (as is the
case at most online sites as well as books), as I pointed out in #5 above.
Grasping the Real Nature
13. Finally, there may be people who attain magga phala, but had never even heard about gandhabba
in this life. If one comprehends the Tilakkhaṇa, that is all needed.
§ In such cases, they had not rejected the concept of a gandhabba. If someone explained the
concept to them, they would accept it since they can see that it must be true.
§ However, if one has hears those explanations and reject them as “nonsense”, that is micchā
diṭṭhi. Those are the concept of a gandhabba (and para loka), instantaneous births, the
existence of other realms, and the existence of Ariyas or yogis who have the ability to see such
realms as well as para loka, and one rejects them as “nonsense”, that is micchā diṭṭhi.
§ The only way to get rid of such micchā diṭṭhi is to examine those concepts and convince oneself
that those must be true.
14. In that process, it is also necessary that one lives a moral life staying away from dasa akusala as
much as possible, as explained in the “Living Dhamma” section. It is important for anyone to
experience the mental clarity (and the “peace of mind” or “niveema“) that comes with staying away
from dasa akusala.
§ By the way, the strongest of the dasa akusala is micchā diṭṭhi, which includes not only the 10
types but also ignorance about Tilakkhaṇa. This is why a Sotāpanna removes 99% or more of
the defilement by getting rid of the BOTH types of micchā diṭṭhi; see, “What is the only
Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“.
§ The first type of micchā diṭṭhi is about the 10 types discussed in #3 above, which includes
believing that nothing happens without a cause, bad causes (dasa akusala) lead to bad
consequences, etc. The second type is about not knowing the true nature of this world of 31
realms, i.e., that it is not possible to maintain anything to one’s satisfaction (anicca), one is
subjected to suffering because of that (dukkha), and thus, one is truly helpless in this rebirth
process (anatta).
§ However, it is difficult to “see” those Tilakkhaṇa until one believes in that bigger picture. That
includes the 31 realms and the rebirth process and the concept of para loka with gandhabbas.
4.8.9 Working of kammā – Critical Role of Conditions
1. We can see various levels of human happiness/suffering around us. We see some people live with
relatively higher levels of health, wealth, and happiness, while others live in poverty, ill-health, and
misery.
§ We become distraught upon hearing that a child died prematurely, or someone was brutally
murdered. Of course, we should generate empathy and sympathy, and also do our utmost to
prevent such horrible occurrences.
§ However, we also need to look at the CAUSES for such things to happen. Once we understand
the underlying causes, we will be able to prevent such things happening to us in the future, if
not in this life, in future lives.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
430 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Nothing happens in this world without a reason or without a cause (normally multiple causes).
In order to prevent tragic outcomes, we need to locate the causes and eliminate them.
§ This is the key message of the Buddha: It is not possible to eliminate the suffering that has
arisen (we can minimize it), but we can eliminate FUTURE suffering from arising.
2. The principle of cause and effect (hetu/phala) is a key principle in Buddha Dhamma, as in modern
science.
§ Science is all about finding out HOW things HAPPEN around us due to CAUSES. A pebble on
the ground will not go up by itself unless some energy is given to it, i.e., we have to pick it up
and throw it up.
§ We receive sunlight because of the Sun is putting out a vast amount of energy every second.
And science has figured out how that happens: That energy comes from nuclear reactions in it;
Sun is a giant fusion reactor.
§ With the development of modern science we have figured out that nothing happens without a
cause; normally there are more than one cause that lead to an effect.
3. However, science has not yet figured out that what happen to humans or any living being are also
due to causes.
§ Does it just happens that X is born healthy and wealthy, Y is born healthy but poor, and Z is
born handicapped and poor?
§ There must be REASONS why X, Y, and Z are born that way.
§ Not only that, many times a person born rich can become poor, and vice versa. Or a person in
good health can die suddenly in an accident or by a heart attack. There must be reasons for such
“turnarounds” too!
§ The laws of kammā can explain all the above. But the laws of kammā are not just based causes
and effects, they DEPEND on CONDITIONS. That is what prevents laws of kammā being
deterministic, i.e., one’s future is NOT determined by one’s past actions or kammā.
4. Science has been unable to come up with explanations for the effects discussed above. There are
two key reasons for this lack of progress in science.
§ First, unlike with inert objects like a pebble, a living being has a mind. When a person moves,
the cause for that movement originates in that person’s mind, i.e., the person decides to move.
Your hand will not move until you decide to move it. And you have the power to STOP its
movement too!
§ The second difference is that for living beings there is a rebirth process. The laws of kammā
cannot be explained without accepting the rebirth process. This is why not believing in rebirth
is a strong micchā diṭṭhi. With that wrong vision, one will never be able to figure out the true
nature of the world and explain why there are so many variations of happiness/misery in living
beings; see, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek “Good Rebirths” and “Micchā Diṭṭhi,
Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ The present life of about 100 years is only an extremely short time in our sansāric journey
(rebirth process). As we go from life to life, our mental states as well as our physical
appearances change; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
5. So, anything and everything in this world happen due to reasons or causes. However, just because
there is a cause, it is not guaranteed that it will give rise to the corresponding effect.
§ In the terminology of Buddha Dhamma, past kammā do not necessarily lead to kammā vipāka.
§ We can grasp this key idea with an example.
6. A seed CAN give rise to a tree. It has the POTENTIAL to bring a tree to existence. However, for
that to happen, suitable CONDITIONS must be present.
§ If we keep a seed in a cool, dry place it will not give rise to a tree, and will remain a seed with
that POTENTIAL for hundreds of years.
§ Eventually, that potential to bring about a tree will go away and the seed will be “dead”.
7. When a strong kammā is done, that creates a kammā beeja, or a kammā seed, that works pretty
much like a normal seed that we discussed above.
§ For that kammā beeja to bring about its result, i.e., kammā vipāka, suitable CONDITIONS must
exist.
§ If suitable conditions do not materialize for long times, then that kammā beeja will lose its
energy and it is said that it will become an ahosi kammā , i.e., that kammā will not bring about
any kammā vipāka.
8. As we mentioned above, the other important factor in this complex process is that a given living
being has gone through a rebirth process that has no discoverable beginning.
§ In this unimaginably long rebirth process, we all have accumulated uncountable kammā seeds,
both good and bad.
§ Those good kammā seeds can bring about good results (health, wealth, beauty, etc), and bad
kammā seeds bad results (ailments, handicaps, poverty, etc).
§ But either kind can run out of energy without giving results (vipāka), if suitable CONDITIONS
do not appear within a period of time.
9. A seed cannot germinate unless required CONDITIONS are provided (i.e., it should be placed in
the ground and water, sunlight, and nutrients need to be provided).
§ In the same way, we can avoid many possible bad kammā vipāka by being mindful and not
providing conditions for them to appear. We can also MAKE conditions for good kammā
vipāka to bring about good results.
§ For example, if one goes into a bad neighborhood at night, that is providing conditions for any
suitable bad kammā seeds waiting to bring about their bad vipāka. On the other hand, we cannot
be successful in any project unless we are willing to provide right conditions: to pass an
examination, we must prepare for it by studying.
§ Even if one is born poor, one could work hard and come out of poverty. If one is prone to
catching diseases, one could eat healthy, exercise, and overcome at least some of the recurring
ailments. Kammā is not deterministic, see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by
Kamma?“.
10. But of course it will be difficult to overcome the results of very strong kammā seeds. One may be
born handicapped due to a strong kammā seed that was generated in a previous birth.
§ In the same way, strong good kammā seeds can bring about good results without much effort.
Some are born rich, healthy, and wealthy due to a past strong good kammā seed coming to
fruition.
11. So, I hope it is clear that one’s happiness in this life could be determined by several different
factors.
§ In relatively few cases, one could automatically (without much effort) receive health, wealth,
and RELATIVE happiness due to strong kammā seeds. In the same way, some others could be
facing miserable lives.
§ However, on the average, one’s happiness in this life is to a large extent is determined by one’s
willingness to make right CONDITIONS for good vipāka to take place and prevent bad vipāka
from appearing.
§ Even more importantly, one could make conditions for health, wealth, etc in future lives by
living moral lives and doing good deeds.
12. Now let us look at what happens when a result materializes due to a kammā vipāka. Once a bad
vipāka materializes, we can certainly manage it to minimize its effects, and in some cases even get rid
of it by working to making conditions for a goodkammā seed to overcome it.
§ For example, if one comes down with cancer, in some cases it can be overcome by good
medical treatment, i.e., making conditions to counter the initial effect.
§ If one is born tall or short, there is nothing much one can do about it. If one is born
handicapped, one will have to live the whole life that way.
§ As we can see, we can improve some of those kammā vipāka, while we cannot do much about
some others.
§ Even the Buddha could not avoid certain vipāka. He had back aches and Devadatta was able to
injure his foot. Ven. Moggallana was beaten to death.
13. Another observation we can make from the above discussion is that when one becomes an
Arahant (or even a Buddha), his suffering is not completely ended at the Arahanthood. He still had to
suffer due to the physical body that had already “started”.
§ So, what was meant by “removal of suffering” when one attains Nibbāna? It is the future
suffering (i.e., suffering in future lives) that is ended. When an Arahant attains Parinibbāna
(i.e., physical death), he/she will not be reborn in this suffering-filled world of 31 realms, and
that is when the suffering completely ends.
§ However, as we have discussed, part of suffering ends with the attainment of Arahanthood:
suffering associated with “saṅkhāra dukkhā” or what is called “samphassa jā vedanā“; see,
“Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
14. Of course, IN THE LONG RUN (in the rebirth process), no matter how hard one strives, it will be
IMPOSSIBLE to attain PERMANENT happiness anywhere in this world. This is called anicca
nature. That is why we need to strive to attain Nibbāna to avoid future suffering.
§ However, it is not an easy task to even to beginning to comprehend the anicca nature, until one
enters the mundane Eightfold Path by getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi, which
include not believing in rebirth or the concept of a gandhabba; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi,
Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ Only when one enters the mundane Eightfold Path that one will be able to grasp the Three
Characteristics of Nature (anicca, dukkha, anatta), and start on the Noble Eightfold Path to
attain Nibbāna.
§ The two types of Eightfold Paths were discussed by the Buddha in the “Mahā Chattarisaka
Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“. Also see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
15. Finally, the role of conditions in the laws of kammā are inherent in the Paṭicca Samuppāda; see,
“What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?” and “Paṭṭhāna Dhamma – Connection to
Cause and Effect (Hetu Phala)“.
§ Paṭicca Samuppāda is discussed in the section: “Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
In this important subsection, we will discuss the link between mind (nāma) and matter (rūpa).
o Mental Aggregates
§ What is Saññā (Perception)?
o Rūpa Aggregate
§ What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!
o Viññāṇa Aggregate
§ Viññāṇa – What It Really Means
o Sakkāya Diṭṭhi
§ Do I Have “A Mind” That Is Fixed and “Mine”?
o Nāmarūpa Formation
§ Kamma Viññāṇa and Nāmarūpa Paricceda Ñāṇa
§ A second example (on the right above) shows a sign. That conveys the “saññā” to stop.
3. At the fundamental level, saññā means “recognition” of an object or a person or a concept; getting
“full comprehension” of what it is AND what it means.
§ Whether one says fire in English or “ginna” in Sinhala, or “fue” in French, if a person knows
how to associate any of those words with “fire”, that is the saññā that comes to one’s mind
when one hears either the word “fire”, “ginna”, or “fue”.
§ If a person does not speak those three languages, those words do not mean anything to that
person. However, with the following picture, anyone will have the idea that it is about a fire or
a flame:
4. Therefore, saññā is the “full picture that comes to the mind instantaneously. ”
§ When we think about a fire, that “sense of what a fire is,” arise automatically. The mind can
visualize a fire.
§ Therefore, regardless of the language, one speaks in, everyone who has seen a fire generates the
same feeling about a fire in one’s mind. That is a crucial point to contemplate on, and will
be valuable in comprehending the “anicca saññā.”
5. Our mental body (gandhabba) can register only pure saññā. When two gandhabbas are
communicating, they cannot use words OR pictures. So, the process is much simpler. What one
gandhabba X thinks about what to say to gandhabba Y, that message or saññā is automatically
transmitted to Y, if Y is pointing attention to X.
§ When gandhabba X wants to see what is happening at a given location, it just needs to point to
that direction and can see that location. We will not discuss the details here, but essential point
is that a gandhabba does not “see” things using light as we do.
§ In the same way, a gandhabba does not hear using an ear. Sound waves propagating through
the air are not needed.
§ That is how most beings — who don’t have physical bodies like us — communicate and
interact with the external world, as emphasized briefly in the previous post, “Our Mental Body
– Gandhabba.”
§ When someone gets to the fourth jhāna and attains abhiññā powers, he/she will be able to see
and hear without eyes and ears. These capabilities are dibba cakkhu or “divine eye” and dibba
sota or “divine ear.” One using one’s own mental body (gandhabba). Then seeing and hearing
is not limited to short distances.
6. However, when a gandhabba is trapped inside a physical body, one does not have those
capabilities (in a normal human). Then one needs to rely on the sense faculties located in the physical
body (eyes, ear, etc.) to capture information that comes via pictures, sounds, etc. The brain to convert
those signals to “saññā” and to transmit them to the gandhabba inside.
§ If you are not clear on this point, please re-read the previous post, “Our Mental Body –
Gandhabba.”
§ In that post, we compared how a gandhabba trapped in a physical body to a human operator
enclosed in a military tank. That is a good analogy.
7. At conception, the gandhabba takes hold of a single cell formed by the union of a mother and a
father. That single cell grows to a baby inside the womb, and a grown adult after birth. See,
“Buddhist Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception.”
§ In an average human, the physical body shields the, the gandhabba. Thus, it cannot receive
direct saññā. Pictures and sounds come through the eyes and ears not as saññā but as video and
audio signals. Those need to be converted to saññā that can be grasped by the gandhabba.
§ When a baby grows, the eyes and ears (as well as nose, tongue, and body) need to develop to
capture those sense inputs. The brain also needs to build circuitry for converting that
information to a “saññā” that can be transferred to the gandhabba so that it can grasp what
object, person, or concept it is.
§ Once those capabilities develop, the signal transmission goes from the brain to the hadaya
vatthu located close to the heart via “kirana” or in the language of modern science
electromagnetic waves. That was discussed briefly in the post, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)
– Introduction.”
8. When a baby is growing up, it learns to associate words and pictures with each object, person,
concept that it experiences. That requires many parts of the brain. That is why it takes a newborn
baby several years to become fully functional in the world.
§ So, when a person hears someone yelling “fire”, the brain matches that with a visual of a fire,
converts it to the correct “saññā” of a fire, and transmits that signal to the gandhabba.
§ The association of a word with its meaning happens in the brain (which is acting like a
computer). Then only the meaning is conveyed to the gandhabba, where our thoughts are
generated.
§ As I have discussed in the posts on the gandhabba, a human gandhabba is born at a cuti-
paṭisandhi moment. It could live to thousands of years in age, and during that time could be
born many times as a human (of course with different bodies). See, “Bhava and Jāti – States of
Existence and Births Therein.”
9. If the relevant parts of the brain are damaged later in one’s life, one may not be able to recognize
one’s surroundings. That is what happens to people with Alzheimer’s disease.
§ When a person gets old, the brain starts degrading, and then again, one’s ability to interact with
the external world could become limited.
§ When that person dies, the gandhabba comes out of the dead body if there is leftover kammic
energy for the human bhava. When a suitable womb becomes available, it can start another
human body. This is how there can be several births during a given human bhava.
10. Now we move to the next level of saññā where it is more than just recognition. For example,
when two people hear the name of a person X, they will have the picture of that person (or “saññā”)
coming to their mind automatically. But not only that, they would register some qualities that they
had attached to that person through their interactions with X. One may say. “It is my Dad. I love him
so much”. Another would say, “Oh, he is a crook.”.
§ Then based on that saññā, each will generate different feelings (vedanā) about X. That could
lead to creating good or bad thoughts (mano saṅkhāra) automatically. If one keeps thinking
about X some more, then one will be consciously generating more thoughts about X, and may
even speak out (vacī saṅkhāra). If the feelings get strong, one may generate kaya saṅkhāra
(thoughts leading to actions), and, for example run to Dad and give him a hug (or avoid the
person perceived to be a crook).
§ Therefore, based on the same thought object, different people can get different saññā and thus
can respond differently.
11. In general, how we make decisions about interacting with others or respond to external stimuli
depends on our “world views.” This is what is called “diṭṭhi” in Buddha Dhamma.
§ When one has wrong world views or diṭṭhis, one could make wrong decisions based on
“distorted saññā.”
§ When one’s mind is free of greed, hate, and ignorance, it is easier to sort out wrong diṭṭhis. The
meanings of greed and hatred are apparent. Ignorance here is the ignorance about the message
of the Buddha. That message, of course, can be grasped only in stages.
§ First, it is crucial to realize that one MUST live a moral life and follow that mundane Eightfold
Path by abstaining from dasa akusala as much as possible.
§ Then it will become easier to cultivate the “anicca saññā,” start grasping the Tilakkhaṇa and
become a Sotāpanna. We will discuss the anicca saññā in upcoming posts.
In the subsection “Living Dhamma – Fundamentals“, we mentioned that there are two types of
suffering that can be eliminated according to Buddha Dhamma. In that subsection, we discussed and
explained how some suffering in this life can be stopped from arising. With this post, we will start a
discussion on the second type suffering associated with future rebirths — which is even more
important — can be stopped from arising.
1. Let us first review the existing ideas from other religions and philosophies. First, let us discuss the
dominant religious view.
§ Most major religions have a world view that is based on three “realms” of existence: human
realm, heavenly realm, and hell. If one lives according to the religious teachings, one will live
in happiness in the heaven forever; if not, one will suffer in the hell forever.
§ It is not explained how one is born in the human realm to start off. It could be that the Creator
created Adam and Eve and their descendants are just born. In this view, the sentient beings in
this world started off at just two and will grow with time; see below.
§ In Hinduism, the “eternal realm of happiness” is not the heaven, but the brahma realm (there is
only one, where one merges with Mahā Brahma). Also, there is no permanent hell, as I
understand.
2. Based on whether one lives according to the “particular religious teachings” or not, one will be
born either in heaven or hell FOREVER.
§ Of course, these religious teachings will vary from one religion to another.
§ Furthermore, even within one religion, they can be changed by a decree from the “head of the
Church”.
§ Since all those who are making those decision are human, It seems illogical that they can
decide on basically their own fate.
3. Turning to philosophy, many people today — especially those who believe that the above religious
reasoning is illogical — take the materialistic view, that one is born out of inert matter only to die and
to be recycled back to the Earth. They are the so-called atheists.
§ In this case, the logic would say that one could live immorally, since any immoral actions to
benefit oneself would not have any consequences.
§ Still, most who belong to this category live moral lives. They have an innate feeling that
morality must be adhered to, but cannot quite explain why.
4. I have discussed the above points in several posts:
§ On religion, see, ““The Language of God” by Francis Collins” and “What Does Buddha
Dhamma Say about Creator, Satan, Angels, and Demons?“.
§ On the belief in a materialistic view, see, ““Why Does the World Exist?” by Jim Holt” and
““Waking Up” by Sam Harris“.
§ In the commonly-used sense of the word “religion”, Buddha Dhamma is not a religion; see, “Is
Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) a Religion?” and “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
§ I would welcome any comments/criticisms on my points above. I can go to more details if
needed, and I believe that the above points cannot be logically refuted.
5. Buddha Dhamma (true and pure Buddhism) does not belong to either of the above two categories.
§ The complex world view of Buddha Dhamma is explained in the subsection “The Grand
Unified Theory of Dhamma“, but a brief introduction is in the post,”What Reincarnates? –
Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ Briefly, one is born in one of 31 realms of existence. From beginning-less time, we all have
been undergoing this rebirth process. But most times we are born in the lower four realms filled
with suffering, and thus the long-term solution is to stop the rebirth process. This is done is four
steps, and at the Arahant stage one stops the rebirth process.
§ This is not a nihilistic or pessimistic view, see, “Nibbāna “Exists”, but Not in This World“.
6. So, that is the background for our discussion. Now, let us discuss how one can get to Nibbāna, or
to stop future suffering.
§ Some Buddhists believe that Nibbāna can be attained by living a moral life and doing
meritorious deeds (puñña kamma).
§ We will now discuss why just living a moral life and doing puñña kamma will not lead to
Nibbāna, even though they are necessary parts of the process.
7. We are born in one of the 31 realms due to six root causes (hethu): lobha, dosa, moha and alobha,
adosa, amoha. This categorization can be used to look at births in different realms in another way.
§ Deeds (kamma) done with lobha, dosa, moha lead to rebirth in the apāyas (lowest 4 realms).
For these deeds, moha is always present with either lobha (pretha and asura realms births) and
or with dosa (niraya or the lowest realm). Births in the animal realms can be due to either.
§ Those deeds done with one or more of alobha, adosa, amoha lead to rebirth in the higher
realms, starting with the human realm.
8. A key gātha or a verse that summarizes the results of meritorious deeds and immoral deeds is:
“Kallan kalla vipakan, suddhan suddha vipakan
Kalla suddhan, kalla suddha vipakan“
Here the word kalla means bad or dark. Suddha means pure or white.
§ So, the word “kallan” in the above verse refers to immoral deeds done with lobha, dosa, moha
and other asobhana cetasika. “Suddhan” implies meritorious deeds done with alobha, adosa,
amoha, and other sobhana cetasika.
§ How different types of cetasika contribute to either defile or purify our minds is discussed in
the subsection, “Living Dhamma – Fundamentals“.
9. In this beginning-less rebirth process, this is how we have been born in almost all of the 31 realms
due to the fact that we keep accumulating both kalla vipāka and suddha vipāka.
§ Furthermore, we have accumulated enough of both kinds to bring about many, many future
births in all those realms.
§ Even if we do not commit a single kalla vipāka in this life, we have done enough of them in the
past to bring about births in the apāyas in the future. This is a point that not many people
understand. I have heard many people say, “I don’t harm anyone, so I hope to get a good
rebirth”. Unfortunately, they are wrong.
10. Punna kamma with “suddha vipāka” leads to two important results in this and future lives that
makes suitable conditions for attaining Nibbāna:
§ Rebirth in the “good realms” (human realm and above). Attaining Nibbāna — or even working
towards it — is possible only in the good realms and especially in the human realm.
§ If done correctly, merits acquired through puñña kamma can lead to a long life (āyusa),
flawless sense faculties (vanna), healthy life without much physical suffering (sukha), and
necessary resources to live without hardships (bala). These benefits make suitable conditions
for one to focus on attaining Nibbāna. For example, if one is sick or is very poor, it is not easy
to follow the Path.
11. On the other hand, “kalla vipāka” or results of immoral deeds lead to births in the apāyas where
the suffering is intense.
§ We have been born in the human realm due to a good uppatthi suddha vipāka.
§ But in this unique human realm one is subject to both kalla vipāka and suddha vipāka as pavutti
kamma vipāka that bring results during the lifetime.
12. Births in the human realm could be a tihethuka (“ti” + hethu“, meaning all three of alobha, adosa,
amoha), dvihethuka (“dvi” + hethu“, meaning alobha and adosa), or ahethuka.
§ Those humans with tihethuka births can attain magga phala in this life if they strive enough.
§ Those humans with dvihethuka births cannot attain magga phala in this life. Since they do not
have the amoha root cause, their wisdom level (paññā) cannot grow beyond a certain point.
However, they can do puñña kamma and be eligible to be reborn a human with a tihethuka birth
in future lives.
§ Even though the word ahethuka literally means “without causes”, here it means weak version of
dvihethuka. Here ahethuka means “without sufficiently good hethu” to be able to follow the
Path. They are born with mental deficiencies that are obvious.
13. It is very important to realize that no one (at the present) can distinguish between tihethuka and
dvihethuka births. On the surface, both types appear the same. For example, there could be people
with higher education, who are dvihethuka, and some with no education who are tihethuka.
§ So, the thing to do is to strive to the best of one’s ability. No matter whether one is tihethuka or
dvihethuka, the efforts will pay off in the long run. Furthermore, being tihethuka does not take
one automatically to Nibbāna; one has to strive.
§ Furthermore, no one should be discouraged and believe they are dvihethuka, if the efforts are
not paying off quickly. One prominent example in the Tipiṭaka is the story about the
Culapanthaka Thero. He almost disrobed because he could not even memorize a single gātha
after trying hard for months. But with Buddha’s help, he was able to attain the Arahanthood in
a day, and even developed abhiññā powers: “WebLink: suttacentral: Cūḷapanthaka“.
14. Therefore, by thinking good thoughts, doing good deeds and by living a moral life, we can
improve our chances (but not guarantee) of a good future rebirth. In fact, this is the goal of all major
religions (to be born in heaven and live there forever).
§ However, nothing in this world of 31 realms is everlasting — and moreover — we do not have
control over where we will be born in the next life, regardless of how well we live this life.
§ It is important to realize that one or more of past bad deeds (kamma vipāka) may still lead to a
bad rebirth, and then it will be very difficult to again get a good rebirth.
§ This is one aspect of the anicca nature, the futility of believing that there is happiness to be
achieved somewhere in this world.
§ The opposite belief that somehow happiness to be achieved somewhere in this world gives rise
to deeply-embedded nicca saññā (a sense of hope) in our minds.
§ One cannot avoid future suffering until one comprehends first that immoral deeds done with the
nicca saññā lead to kalla vipāka and will bring much suffering. Even though moral deeds done
with the nicca saññā lead to suddha vipāka with happiness, one cannot avoid immoral deeds in
the long run, BECAUSE OF this nicca saññā.
15. Therefore, until we change our wrong view (and the corresponding wrong perception or saññā)
that there is happiness to be had in this world, we will never be released from future suffering.
§ This is the unique message of the Buddha. We will discuss how we can get rid of this nicca
saññā and cultivate the anicca saññā in the next post.
4.9.1.1. Diṭṭhi, Saññā, and Saṅkhāra – How They Relate
3
You may want to read the previous posts on sañña in this section — especially the post, “Saññā –
What It Really Means” — before reading this post.
1. One’s perceptions (saññā) are closely associated with one’s own views (diṭṭhi), and both of those
affect how we think (citta), and generate saṅkhāra.
Since most of our world views are based on ideas from our families, friends, and religions that we are
born into, those inputs play a major role in our views and therefore our perceptions and how we think
— and thus generate saṅkhāra.
§ It is not possible to get rid of the wrong perceptions (vipareetha saññā) without getting rid of
the wrong views (micchā dithhi or simply diṭṭhi).
§ There are some major world views which must be removed before one can even hope to get an
idea about anicca saññā. We will discuss some of these key factors first.
2. Most people believe in an everlasting heaven after death, and that perception is based on the world
view that says our world can be divided into three “major categories or realms”: hell, human world,
and heaven. This world view and the corresponding perception or saññā comes from families who
have been taught that world view through generations via religious teachings.
§ This world view is also based on the idea that the Earth was created by a Creator and the
heavens are in the sky where the Creator resides and where one will go after death if one has
lived according to those teachings. Those who disobey those teachings are supposed to be born
in the hell for eternity.
§ Even though this cosmic world view is rejected by modern science (the heavens actually
comprise of trillions of planetary systems just like our Solar system), most people still go by
that wrong view.
§ It is astonishing to see that even some prominent scientists are willing to disregard scientific
facts and believe (i.e., have the perception) that the Earth — and thus the whole universe —
was created by a Creator. I am not sure where they think the heavens are located among those
trillions of star systems.
3. Another example is killing animals for sport, which includes fishing. This is based on the view that
animals are not sentient and — in most religions — were created by the Creator for human
consumption.
This is such an ingrained diṭṭhi, that many people who live otherwise moral lives fail to see the
suffering endured by these animals.
§ While fish cannot cry out, the severe pain felt by a wriggling fish caught on a hook is quite
apparent. It is feeling both the pain in mouth due to hook, and also is suffering due to lack of
oxygen, since it cannot breath like we do.
§ Higher animals are capable of showing their pain, among other emotions. Anyone who has a
pet dog or cat knows that they do have emotions like we do.
§ But we tend to totally disregards such easy-to-see things, because of our diṭṭhis. The underlying
reason is the religious view that animals are here for our consumption.
§ However, we all have had animal births, as well as deva and brahma births. Comprehension of
this fact can help change one’s perception about animals.
§ Still, we cannot equate animal lives to human lives as some animal right activists believe. When
one comprehends Buddha Dhamma, one can avoid going to either extreme.
§ In other words, one can remove distorted perceptions (vipareetha saññā) by removing wrong
views (micchā diṭṭhi). The latter is done by learning pure Buddha Dhamma.
4. Those are a couple of obvious examples of major micchā diṭṭhi. The key reason that those diṭṭhi
propagate through generations is the inability to “break through” such ingrained beliefs by
contemplating on facts.
§ For example, even in Buddhist countries, there are fishing villages where fishing is the
livelihood of many, who have done it for many generations.
§ Some may say that those people need to make a living to sustain their families. But that
argument is no better than the argument that a drug addict needs to inhale another dose just to
get through the day: the long-term consequences are infinitely worse.
§ It is customary for the older generations in many countries to teach their children or grand
children how to fish or hunt animals for sport. That custom passes through generations.
5. Another wrong view (and hence the perception) that we have is about the high value placed on our
physical bodies and also on sense pleasures. This perception is predominant in Western countries, but
is growing in other countries as well.
§ People spend billions of dollars a year in trying to make their physical bodies “more beautiful”.
This is mainly because they don’t realize — or don’t even contemplate — on the fact that no
matter how much money one can spend, one’s body CANNOT be maintained at peak condition
for too long.
§ In fact, this wrong perception leads to an enhanced level of suffering at old age, when despite
any amount of money one can spend, one’s body becomes frail and not so appealing. This can
lead to severe depression.
§ On the other hand, for those who have comprehended the anicca nature, the old age is a fact of
life. One needs to spend one’s “peak years” not trying to beautify one’s body, but to make
progress on the Path while the brain is working optimally. When the body starts degrading at
old age, the brain goes down too. So, one must exercise and eat healthy to keep both the body
and the brain in good condition as long as possible.
§ This happens to everyone, regardless of how powerful or wealthy they are. At President
Trump’s inauguration, this was quite obvious by looking at the ex-Presidents.
§ Think about any famous, beautiful or wealthy person that has grown old, to convince of the
truth of this anicca nature.
6. Anything in this world — living or inert — has this characteristic. It is born, goes through the
formation process, reaches the peak condition, starts to decay, and becomes dead or destroyed at
some point; see, “Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata“.
§ Somethings last short times: for example, a fly or a flower. Other things can last for tens of
years: for example, humans or a car. Then there are things that live much longer: for example, a
brahma or a star system like our Solar system.
§ But eventually anything in this world — a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) — decays and is
destroyed at some point.
§ Even though those things that reach the peak condition can provide/enjoy sense pleasures, they
do not last long.
§ The overall effect or the net effect is suffering, when one considers the rebirths in the 31 realms
in the long term.
7. In the Vipallasa Sutta (Anguttara Nikāya), The Buddha stated that there are three types of
vipallasa or distortions about anicca, dukkha, anatta, and asubha. We have discussed the first three
in detail at this website. Asubha (not fruitful) is the opposite of subha (fruitful or beneficial).
§ No matter how appealing those sense pleasures or sense objects can be, they all make one get
trapped in the rebirth process. That is why they are asubha.
§ The three types of vipallasa are diṭṭhi vipallasa, saññā vipallasa, and citta vipallasa.
§ They are the distortions associated with views, perceptions, and the way we think (and thus
make saṅkhāra, and especially puñña abhisaṅkhāra and apuñña abhisaṅkhāra).
8. Let us consider the diṭṭhi, saññā, and citta vipallasa about the anicca nature as an example.
§ We have the wrong view that things in this world have nicca nature, i.e., that they can provide
with happiness. This is the diṭṭhi vipallasa about the actual anicca nature.
§ Because of this wrong view, we develop the saññā vipallasa about the anicca nature of things:
We tend to perceive (saññā) that things in this world can provide happiness.
§ Because of the wrong perception, we tend to think (citta) that things in this world can provide
us with happiness. Thus we do (abhi) saṅkhāra that prolong the rebirth process for puñña
abhisaṅkhāra and, even worse, make one suffer mightily in the future rebirths through apuñña
abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Therefore, we constantly generate mano saṅkhāra (automatic thoughts about worldly sense
objects), vacī saṅkhāra (conscious thoughts or speech), and act accordingly (kaya saṅkhāra).
9. All three types of such saṅkhāra leads to suffering in this world AND also in future rebirths. These
are the saṅkhāra that arise due to avijjā (not realizing the true nature of this world): “avijjā paccayā
saṅkhāra“.
Those saṅkhāra eventually lead to bhava and jāti via paṭicca samuppāda. Here jāti means both future
rebirths AND also “births during this life”, see, “Suffering in This Life and Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ This is why it is important to first learn Dhamma and first grasp the fact that suffering in this
life can arise due to our conscious thoughts and actions. Not only that, but that suffering CAN
BE stopped from arising IN THIS LIFE.
§ Once one comprehends this fact and lives accordingly, one can actually experience the
nirāmisa sukha when one removes this type of suffering.
§ Furthermore, this helps one build true faith (saddhā) in Buddha Dhamma, and will convince
one of the truth in the much worse type of suffering in future rebirths.
§ This was explained in the first few subsections in the “Living Dhamma” section.
10. At that stage, one may be able to comprehend the anicca nature of the rebirth process: The truth
of the rebirth process that nowhere in the 31 realms can one find happiness.
§ Moreover, one will “see” that unimaginable levels of suffering is present in the lowest four
realms (apāyas). Therefore, one will get rid of the diṭṭhi vipallasa about dukkha: instead of the
wrong view that there is happiness in human, deva, or brahma realms, one will “see” that any
happiness to be had is only temporary, and much more suffering inevitable if one stays in the
rebirth process.
§ Then one will also “see” that one is truly helpless if stayed in this rebirth process (saṃsāra).
Thus one will get rid of diṭṭhi vipallasa about that this world is of atta nature, and truly “see”
the “anatta nature”.
§ One will also “see” that — in the long run — things in this world are not subha, i.e., they are
not good or fruitful. Attachment to anything in this world will lead to suffering in the long run.
Thus a Sotāpanna will have removed the diṭṭhi vipallasa “distorted views” about subha nature
as well.
§ That is how one gets rid of diṭṭhi vipallasa, and realizes that liberation or relief from this long
term suffering can be achieved only via Nibbāna — by stopping the rebirth process and by
dissociating from the material world, see, “Nibbāna“.
11. Saññā (pronounced “sangna”) comes from “san” + “gnana“, which means “wisdom” about “san“.
But normal humans have only vipareetha sangna or saññā vipallasa: they do not see “san” as bad.
§ Saññā vipallasa can be removed only by first attaining sammā diṭṭhi, i.e., by getting rid of diṭṭhi
vipallasa. Then one will be able to perceive the benefits or the harm in each speech or action
that one is about to make.
§ When one has right vision and perceives things as they really are, then one will start thinking
along those lines, i.e., one will start removing citta vipallasa.
12. For completion, we will end with the following technical details: It is stated that the diṭṭhi
vipallasa about anicca, dukkha, anatta, and asubha are all removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Saññā vipallasa about anicca and anatta is removed at the Sotāpanna stage, but saññā
vipallasa about dukkha and asubha are removed in stages and is completely removed only at
the Arahant stage.
§ Same is true for the citta vipallasa: citta vipallasa about anicca and anatta is removed at the
Sotāpanna stage, but citta vipallasa about dukkha and asubha are removed in stages and is
completely removed only at the Arahant stage.
§ This is why even though a Sotāpanna can “see” that things in this world can eventually lead to
only suffering, he/she will still tend to enjoy sense pleasures — those that can be experienced
without doing apayagami deeds.
§ Even though an Anāgāmī has removed the desire for sense pleasures in the kāma loka, he/she
will still tend to enjoy jhānic pleasures and those sense inputs available via eyes and ears (for
example, the desire to listen or read Dhamma concepts).
§ All vipallasa are completely removed only at the Arahant stage. An Arahant does not make
apuñña abhisaṅkhāra that lead to heat (or thāpa) in the mind that lead to suffering in this life or
makes one eligible to be born in the apāyas. He does not make puñña abhisaṅkhāra that make
one eligible to be born in the “good realms” either. He just makes only kammically neutral
saṅkhāra or kriya that allows to maintain life until parinibbana or death.
4.9.1.2 What Is Vedanā (Feelings)?
Vedanā and Samphassa Jā Vedanā – More Than Just Feelings replaces (11Nov2018) Vedanā – What
It Really Means
Does Bodily Pain Arise Only Due to Kamma Vipāka?
4.9.1.2. Vedanā and Samphassa Jā Vedanā – More Than Just Feelings
1
February 18, 2017; November 10, 2018 Rewritten and replaces Vedanā – What It Really Means
1. Vedanā is conventionally translated as “feelings”, but it is much more than just feelings. The
Buddha said that vedanā can be analyzed in many ways, with simple or deeper meanings. Here we
will analyze vedanā in a way that will be most helpful at this stage (for those who have been
following the “Living Dhamma” section from the beginning.
§ In this analysis we will discuss 9 types of vedanā.
§ By understanding these 9 types of vedanā, we can understand how to correctly do
vedanānupassanā in the Satipatthāna bhāvanā.
2. At the very fundamental level vedanā means “veema danaveema” (වීම දැනවීම) in Sinhala, which
means “one becomes aware (of a sense input)” and experience the corresponding good, bad, or
neutral kamma vipāka.
§ That is the vedanā experienced by an Arahant. He/she simply is aware of a sense input, and
does not ADD anymore vedanā in his/her mind to that sense input.
§ A vedanā can be a dukha vedanā (due to a past bad kamma), a sukha vedanā (due to a past
good kamma), or a neutral sensation — like feeling the wind on the body — called an upekkha
vedanā.
§ Even an Arahant will experience those dukha or sukha vedanā, as long as he/she has the
physical body. It is only those “samphassa jā vedanā” that will not arise in an Arahant; see
below. No more vedanā of any type arise in an Arahant after the death, because he/she will not
be reborn in the 31 realms of “this world”.
§ However, normal humans go far beyond that and generate three additional types of their own
mind-made “samphassa ja vedanā“, as we will discuss below.
3. It is important to realize that sukha and dukha vedanā due to kamma vipāka are felt by the physical
body. They result due to past good or bad kamma vipāka. This can be verified by referring to
Abhidhamma:
§ Akusala kamma vipāka coming though the body are listed as, “dukkha sahagatham kāya
viññānam“, and kusala kamma vipāka coming though the body are listed as, “sukha
sahagatham kāya viññānam“.
§ Neutral (upekkha) vedanā can arise via all five physical senses; see #7 below.
4. A normal human being will mentally generate three more type of vedanā due to those sukha,
dukha, and neutral vedanā that initially arise due to kamma vipāka via all five physical senses.
§ If it is dukha vedanā (due to a headache, getting injured, etc. ), one is likely to start worrying
about it and add more suffering. Those are domanassa vedanā or āmisa dukha vedanā.
§ If it is sukha vedanā (getting a massage, lying in a luxurious bed, etc. ), one is likely to start
generating thoughts about how good it is and how one can enjoy similar sukha vedanā in the
future. Those are somanassa vedanā or āmisa sukha vedanā ; one could also be generating
them by remembering past such sukha vedanā. These are also added in by the mind.
§ Somanassa means “mind-made joyful”. Domanassa means “mind-made misery”, which is
basically a depressed mindset.
§ If a vedanā due to a kamma vipāka is not that strong one may just generate neutral feelings
about it; that is āmisa upekkha vedanā.
5. Let us take some examples to illustrate how those additional types of vedanā can arise due to initial
dukha vedanā and sukha vedanā.
§ Suppose someone comes down with an illness. Any pain (dukha vedanā) due to that illness
CANNOT be avoided by anyone once the illness takes hold: It is the RESULT (vipāka) of a
previous CAUSE (kamma).
§ Of course, it is possible that one could have avoided the kamma vipāka to materialize by trying
to minimize CONDITIONS (paccayā); see, “What Does “Paccayā” Mean in Paṭicca
Samuppāda?“. That is why kamma vipāka can be avoided by being mindful and taking
precautions.
§ Once an illness starts, all one can do is to take medicines and also take any possible actions to
reduce the pain.
§ However, people tend to make the situation worse by starting to generate negative feelings
about the situation. This gives rise to domanassa vedanā.
6. In the same way, one can start generating somanassa vedanā based on a sukha vedanā that was
brought by a good kamma vipāka.
§ For example, when one is eating a delicious meal, one could be generating joyful thoughts
about how delicious it is and how one can eat it again in the future. Such joyful thoughts
(somanassa vedanā) may be generated even long after the meal.
§ Both domanassa and somanassa vedanā are “mind-made”. They are called “samphassa jā
vedanā“; see #8 below.
7. Kamma vipāka also lead to sense inputs at the other four physical senses. They are all neutral.
Thus neutral vedanā can arise via all five physical senses.
§ Kusala and akusala vipāka coming through those four sense doors are listed as, “upekkha
sahagatham cakkhu viññānam“, “upekkha sahagatham sota viññānam“, “upekkha sahagatham
ghāṇa viññānam“, and “upekkha sahagatham jivhā viññānam“.
§ For example, when we see an “eye-pleasing picture”, the initial vedanā felt by the mind is
neutral.
§ However, that “neutral feeling” may not even register in one’s mind because “samphassa jā
vedanā” that we discuss next arise automatically and instantaneously based on one’s gati.
8. But if one has cravings or repulsion to such pictures, one will start generating “samphassa jā
vedanā“, or feelings that arise due to “samphassa” (“san” + “phassa” or contacts with “san” that is in
one’s mind); see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansara (or Samsara)“.
§ It is easy to understand this when one contemplates on some examples. Upon seeing person X,
an enemy of X will generate what are called “domanassa vedanā” or bad feelings, whereas a
friend of X will generate “somanassa vedanā” or good feelings.
§ The same is true for sounds, tastes, and smells. Even though there appear to be “universally
good” tastes, that is not true for an Arahant. We just cannot comprehend it at this stage. But we
know that some foods enjoyed by some could be repulsive to others, for example.
§ In akusala-mula paṭicca samuppāda, the “phassa paccayā vedanā” step, the vedanā that arises
is really “samphassa jā vedanā“; see, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
9. Three more types of mentally generated vedanā can arise in those who are on the Noble Eightfold
Path. These arise by suppressing or eliminating those āmisa vedanā or “samphassa jā vedanā”
discussed above.
§ In the beginning of this section we discussed how heat or tāpa in the mind arise due to “san”
which are greed (lobha), hate (dosa), and ignorance (moha); see, “Suffering in This Life – Role
of Mental Impurities” and “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life“.
10. When one constantly is attached or repulsed by all those sense inputs that one experiences in a
given day, one’s mind can get really stressed out. A normal human being may even not be aware of
this heat (tāpa) in the mind; see those two posts mentioned above, and other posts in the beginning of
the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ Even if one is generating somanassa vedanā, those inevitably lead to the stress in the mind.
However, the effect is easily seen with domanassa vedanā.
§ This is very important to grasp. You may want to go back and read those posts.
11. When one stays away from generating too many “samphassa jā vedanā” of both kinds, one will
start feeling three more types of vedanā. These are called nirāmisa vedanā, because they arise due to
staying away from cravings (and repulsion) to worldly objects.
§ When one prevents the mind from heating up by comprehending the adverse effects of “san”
and staying away from them, one’s mind starts “cooling down”. This is the nirāmisa sukha
vedanā that we have discussed in many posts.
§ This is what is emphasized by “ātāpi sampajāno” in the Mahā Satipatthāna Sutta; it means
“remove the fire or heat from one’s mind by being aware of the ‘san‘ or “immoral tendencies”;
see, “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Structure“.
§ The pleasant feelings one feels during jhānās are also nirāmisa sukha vedanā. They are devoid
of tāpa or heat.
§ Such feelings can also be experienced when one is doing a meritorious deed, such as giving or
helping out someone in need. Those are also devoid of tāpa or heat, and are nirāmisa sukha
vedanā.
§ Nirāmisa sukha can of course be experienced while engaging in meditation, especially metta
bhāvanā. This is optimized when one does those bhāvanā with comprehension of anicca,
dukkha, anatta, i.e., when one does it with full comprehension of “ātāpi sampajāno”.
12. There are two more types of vedanā that one experiences when proceeding on the Noble
Eightfold Path.
§ Sometimes, one gets a bit discouraged by not advancing “fast enough” on the Path. One thinks
about “why am I not getting to the Sotāpanna stage?” or “Is there anything that I am missing in
order to make progress?”, etc.
§ Those are not domanassa vedanā (because they are devoid of paṭigha anusaya); they are
nirāmisa dukha vedanā. It is common for one to experience such vedanā.
§ If a vedanā is not that strong one may just generate neutral feelings about it; that is nirāmisa
upekkha vedanā.
13. The key to vedanānupassanā in the Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā is to be able to recognize which type of
vedanā one feels.
§ If it is a dukha (vipāka) vedanā, one understands that one needs to bear it (after reducing it as
much as possible with medicines, etc). One needs to understand why such a vipāka vedanā
arise, and remedy it as much as possible. After all, our goal is to stop any type of suffering.
§ A good example is the pain one feels when sitting cross-legged at meditation retreats. Just by
saying “I feel this vedanā” will not of any use. That vedanā can be removed by shifting one’s
posture. I have seen some instructors advice people to just bear the pain saying that it will go
away. It may go away because the nerves may become numb. That is not good in the long term.
§ Also, one needs to understand why one should stop generating domanassa and somanassa
vedanā, per above discussion.
§ And one should of course cultivate nirāmisa sukha vedanā that arise when one starts on the
Path (especially upon comprehending Tilakkhaṇa to some extent) and reduces the tendency to
generate domanassa and somanassa vedanā.
14. Vedanānupassanā is all about first identifying the types of vedanā one is experiencing, and then
deciding what to do about them. Getting rid of all vedanā — as some believe — is the wrong thing to
try to do.
Vipāka vedanā do not have lobha, dosa, moha, but vipāka vedanā can lead to samphassa jā vedanā
which will have lobha, dosa, moha.
§ vipāka vedanā needs to be experienced with upekkha.
§ Samphassa jā vedanā are the ones to be stopped.
§ Nirāmisa vedanā are the ones to be cultivated.
15. In summary, try to avoid vipāka dukha vedanā by trying not to make conditions for them to
appear; see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“. Do not indulge in vipāka sukha vedanā when
those arise. Suppress and gradually eliminate samphassa jā vedanā and cultivate nirāmisa vedanā,
which is what the “Living Dhamma” section is all about.
February 18, 2017; this is being replaced by Vedanā and Samphassa Jā Vedanā – More Than Just
Feelings
1. Vedanā is conventionally translated as “feelings”, but it is much more than just feelings. The
Buddha said that vedanā can be analyzed in many ways, with simple or deeper meanings. Here we
will analyze vedanā in a way that will be most helpful at this stage (for those who have been
following the “Living Dhamma” section from the beginning.
§ In this analysis we will discuss 9 types of vedanā (highlighted in bold italic red).
§ By understanding these 9 types of vedanā, we can understand how to correctly do
vedananupassana in the Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā.
2. At the very fundamental level vedanā means “veema danaveema” in Sinhala, which means “one
becomes aware (of a sense input)” and experience the corresponding good, bad, or neutral kamma
vipāka.
§ That is the vedanā experienced by an Arahant. He/she simply is aware of a sense input, and
does not ADD anymore vedanā in his/her mind to that sense input.
§ A vedanā can be a dukha vedanā (due to a past bad kamma), a sukha vedanā (due to a past
good kamma), or a neutral sensation — like feeling the wind on the body — called an upekkha
vedanā.
§ An Arahant will bear them all with a neutral mind even though the dukha or sukha sensation
cannot be avoided.
§ However, normal humans go far beyond that and generate three additional types of their own
mind-made “samphassa ja vedanā“, as we will discuss below.
3. It is important to realize that sukha and dukha vedanā due to kamma vipāka are felt by the physical
body. They result due to past good or bad kamma vipāka. This can be verified by referring to
Abhidhamma:
§ Akusala kamma vipāka coming though the body are listed as, “dukkha sahagatham kaya
vinnanam“, and kusala kamma vipāka coming though the body are listed as, “sukha
sahagatham kaya vinnanam“.
§ Neutral (upekkha) vedanā can arise via all five physical senses; see #7 below.
4. A normal human being will mentally generate three more type of vedanā due to those sukha,
dukha, and neutral vedanā that initially arise due to kamma vipāka via all five physical senses.
§ If it is dukha vedanā (due to a headache, getting injured, etc. ), one is likely to start worrying
about it and add more suffering. Those are domanassa vedanā or amisa dukha vedanā.
§ If it is sukha vedanā (getting a massage, lying in a luxurious bed, etc. ), one is likely to start
generating thoughts about how good it is and how one can enjoy similar sukha vedanā in the
future. Those are somanassa vedanā or amisa sukha vedanā ; one could also be generating
them by remembering past such sukha vedanā. These are also added in by the mind.
§ Somanassa means “mind-made joyful”. Domanassa means “mind-made misery”, which is
basically a depressed mindset.
§ If a vedanā due to a kamma vipāka is not that strong one may just generate neutral feelings
about it; that is amisa upekkha vedanā.
5. Let us take some examples to illustrate how those additional types of vedanā can arise due to initial
dukha vedanā and sukha vedanā.
§ Suppose someone comes down with an illness. Any pain (dukha vedanā) due to that illness
CANNOT be avoided by anyone once the illness takes hold: It is the RESULT (vipāka) of a
previous CAUSE (kamma).
§ Of course, it is possible that one could have avoided the kamma vipāka to materialize by trying
to minimize CONDITIONS (paccaya); see, “What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca
Samuppāda?“. That is why kamma vipāka can be avoided by being mindful and taking
precautions.
§ Once an illness starts, all one can do is to take medicines and also take any possible actions to
reduce the pain.
§ However, people tend to make the situation worse by starting to generate negative feelings
about the situation. This gives rise to domanassa vedanā.
6. In the same way, one can start generating somanassa vedanā based on a sukha vedanā that was
brought by a good kamma vipāka.
§ For example, when one is eating a delicious meal, one could be generating joyful thoughts
about how delicious it is and how one can eat it again in the future. Such joyful thoughts
(somanassa vedanā) may be generated even long after the meal.
7. Kamma vipāka also lead to sense inputs at the other four physical senses. They are all neutral.
Thus neutral vedanā can arise via all five physical senses.
§ Kusala and akusala vipāka coming through those four sense doors are listed as, “upekkha
sahagatham cakkhu vinnanam“, “upekkha sahagatham sota vinnanam“, “upekkha sahagatham
ghana vinnanam“, and “upekkha sahagatham jivha vinnanam“.
§ For example, when we see an “eye-pleasing picture”, the initial vedanā felt by the mind is
neutral.
8. But if one has cravings or repulsion to such pictures, one will start generating “samphassa ja
vedanā“, or feelings that arise due to “samphassa” (“san” + “phassa” or contacts with “san” that is in
one’s mind); see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ It is easy to understand this when one contemplates on some examples. Upon seeing person X,
an enemy of X will generate what are called “domanassa vedanā” or bad feelings, whereas a
friend of X will generate “somanassa vedanā” or good feelings.
§ The same is true for sounds, tastes, and smells. Even though there appear to be “universally
good” tastes, that is not true for an Arahant. We just cannot comprehend it at this stage. But we
know that some foods enjoyed by some could be repulsive to others, for example.
9. Three more types of mentally generated vedanā can arise in those who are on the Noble Eightfold
Path. These arise by suppressing or eliminating those amisa vedanā or “samphassa ja vedanā”
discussed above.
§ In the beginning of this section we discussed how heat or tāpa in the mind arise due to “san”
which are greed (lobha), hate (dosa), and ignorance (moha); see, “Suffering in This Life – Role
of Mental Impurities” and “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life“.
10. When one constantly is attached or repulsed by all those sense inputs that one experiences in a
given day, one’s mind can get really stressed out. A normal human being may even not be aware of
this heat (tāpa) in the mind; see those two posts mentioned above, and other posts in the beginning of
the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ Even if one is generating somanassa vedanā, those inevitably lead to the stress in the mind.
However, the effect is easily seen with domanassa vedanā.
§ This is very important to grasp. You may want to go back and read those posts.
11. When one stays away from generating too many “samphassa ja vedanā” of both kinds, one will
start feeling three more types of vedanā. These are called nirāmisa vedanā, because they arise due to
staying away from cravings (and repulsion) to worldly objects.
§ When one prevents the mind from heating up by comprehending the adverse effects of “san”
and staying away from them, one’s mind starts “cooling down”. This is the nirāmisa sukha
vedanā that we have discussed in many posts.
§ This is what is emphasized by “ātāpi sampajāno” in the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta; it means
“remove the fire or heat from one’s mind by being aware of the ‘san‘ or “immoral tendencies”;
see, “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Structure“.
§ The pleasant feelings one feels during jhānas are also nirāmisa sukha vedanā. They are devoid
of tāpa or heat.
§ Such feelings can also be experienced when one is doing a meritorious deed, such as giving or
helping out someone in need. Those are also devoid of thāpa or heat, and are nirāmisa sukha
vedanā.
§ Nirāmisa sukha can of course be experienced while engaging in meditation, especially metta
bhāvanā. This is optimized when one does those bhāvanā with comprehension of anicca,
dukkha, anatta, i.e., when one does it with full comprehension of “ātāpi sampajāno”.
12. There are two more types of vedanā that one experiences when proceeding on the Noble
Eightfold Path.
§ Sometimes, one gets a bit discouraged by not advancing “fast enough” on the Path. One thinks
about “why am I not getting to the Sotāpanna stage?” or “Is there anything that I am missing in
order to make progress?”, etc.
§ Those are not domanassa vedanā (because they are devoid of paṭigha anusaya); they are
nirāmisa dukha vedanā. It is common for one to experience such vedanā.
§ If a vedanā is not that strong one may just generate neutral feelings about it; that is nirāmisa
upekkha vedanā.
13. The key to vedananupassana in the Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā is to be able to recognize which type of
vedanā one feels.
§ If it is a dukha (vipāka) vedanā, one understands that one needs to bear it (after reducing it as
much as possible with medicines, etc). One needs to understand why such a vipāka vedanā
arise, and remedy it as much as possible. After all, our goal is to stop any type of suffering.
§ A good example is the pain one feels when sitting cross-legged at meditation retreats. Just by
saying “I feel this vedanā” will not of any use. That vedanā can be removed by shifting one’s
posture. I have seen some instructors advice people to just bear the pain saying that it will go
away. It may go away because the nerves may become numb. That is not good in the long term.
§ Also, one needs to understand why one should stop generating domanassa and somanassa
vedanā, per above discussion.
§ And one should of course cultivate nirāmisa sukha vedanā that arise when one starts on the
Path (especially upon comprehending Tilakkhaṇa to some extent) and reduces the tendency to
generate domanassa and somanassa vedanā.
14. Vedananupassana is all about first identifying the types of vedanā one is experiencing, and then
deciding what to do about them. Getting rid of all vedanā — as some believe — is the wrong thing to
try to do.
Vipāka vedanā do not have lobha, dosa, moha, but vipāka vedanā can lead to samphassa ja vedanā
which will have lobha, dosa, moha.
§ Vipāka vedanā needs to be experienced with upekkha.
§ Samphassa ja vedanā are the ones to be stopped. [ja, (-°) [adj. -suffix from jan, see janati; cp.
°ga; gacchati] born, produced, sprung or arisen from]
§ Nirāmisa vedanā are the ones to be cultivated.
15. In summary, try to avoid vipāka dukha vedanā by trying not to make conditions for them to
appear; see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“. Do not indulge in vipāka sukha vedanā when
those arise. Suppress and gradually eliminate samphassa ja vedanā and cultivate nirāmisa vedanā,
which is what the “Living Dhamma” section is all about.
§ That is — in brief — what vedananupassana is all about.
More details on vedanā can be found at: “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways” and “Feelings:
Sukha, Dukha, Somanassa, and Domanassa“.
4.9.1.2. Does Bodily Pain Arise Only Due to Kamma Vipāka?
2
1. Vedanā can be categorized into five types (WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Vibhaṅga Sutta; SN
48.4):
§ Two are generated by the mind (called cetasikam sukham and cetasikam dukkham in the
above Sutta) due to one’s gathi: somanassa (joy) and domanassa (depression).
§ Two felt by the body (called kāyikaṃ sukham and kāyikaṃ dukkham in the above Sutta) and
are “real”, not mind-made: sukha (bodily pleasure) and dukkha (bodily pain).
4. Regarding Abhidhamma, most people use the book “A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma”,
by Bhikkhu Bodhi (First Edition 2000). This is the English translation of the “Abhidhammattha
Sangaha”, a commentary to the Abhidhamma Pitaka in the Tipiṭaka, by Acariya Anuruddha, who
lived around the same time as Acariya Buddhaghosa, who wrote the commentary Visuddhimagga.
§ Both these recent commentaries have material inconsistent with the Tipiṭaka; see, “Incorrect
Theravada Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
§ I have stated a discussion focused on the book “A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma”,
by Bhikkhu Bodhi (2000) at the discussion forum: “Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma
(Bhikkhu Bodhi) – Grave Error on p. 164“.
5. Going back to our original discussion, the key point from Abhidhamma is that only bodily sense
inputs (experienced via the physical body) can bring in sukha (pleasant) or dukha (unpleasant or
painful) bodily sensations.
§ In other words, when we experience joy (upon seeing a loved one) and dislike (upon seeing an
enemy) are both mind-made; same is true for taste, sounds, smell. Same is also true for dhammā
that come to the mind (recalling past events or future plans).
§ However, kāyika sukha or kāyika dukkha arises due to injuries and sicknesses (headaches,
cancer, etc), and are thus “real”.
§ We have discussed these in various posts, but I wanted to find a couple of Suttas, where this is
clearly stated concisely. Those are given in #1 and #2 above.
6. It must also be stated that the Buddha has described vedanā as two types to 108 types depending on
the analysis; see, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral: Bahuvedanīya Sutta (MN 59)“. For this
discussion, the fives types are appropriate.
§ Another complexity involved is due to sense experiences that arise as part of a being’s bhava
(yet at the root still determined by kammā), which are called “kāma guna“; see, “Kāma Guna,
Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha“. This is also mentioned in the above Sutta.
§ For example, dogs and pigs eat feces because they taste such things as tasty. Humans, in
general, taste sugar as sweet and salty as salty, etc. Those are kāma guna associated with each
bhava; An Arahant would taste them the same way.
7. Everything in this world arise with mind as the root cause. That is what is meant by the
Dhammapada gāthā : “mano pubbangamā dhammā, mano setta manomayā..”.
§ At the very fundamental level, those ‘kammā beeja” or “kammic energy” has its root in javana
citta with one or more of the six root causes: lobha, dosa, moha, and alobha, adosa, amoha.
§ It is also important to realize is that the three types of kammā are done by mano, vacī, and kāya
saṅkhāra: “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
8. This vicious cycle of “vipāka” leading to new “kammā” (via acting with avijjā), which in turn lead
to more “vipāka”, is the process that binds us to the samsāra of endless rebirths, or perpetuate our
“world” of suffering; see, “How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“.
§ The Buddha described this as, “kammā vipākā vaddanti, vipāko kammā sambhavo, tasmā
punabbhavo hoti, evan loko pavattati“.
§ That means, “kammā lead to vipāka, vipāka in turn lead to kammā and thus to rebirth
(punabbhavo), and that is how the world (existence) is maintained”. Here “sambhava” is “san”
+ “bhava“, or “adding more existences”. Also, “loka” is world, and “pavatta” means
“maintain”.
9. However, the working of kammā/kammā vipāka is NOT deterministic, i.e., just because one has
done a bad (good) deed in the past, that DOES NOT mean one would get the corresponding result
(bad or good); see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
§ This is because “conditions” are a key aspect of Paṭicca Samuppāda (cause and effect) in
Buddha Dhamma. Just because there are causes (kammā beeja), corresponding vipāka do not
take place unless suitable conditions come into play; see, “How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles
Initiated?“ and “Paṭṭhāna Dhammā“.
10. On the other hand, things DO NOT just happen. One or more causes MUST act as the root cause
for a good (or bad) effect. Therefore, a past kammā, is ALWAYS needed to act as the cause.
§ The above is an important point, so let me give an example. When someone gets a headache or
cancer that is a bodily vedanā arising solely due to a kammā vipāka and one’s action at that
time does not come into play. Of course, one can take subsequent actions to either
alleviate that problem or even to get rid of it.
§ On the other hand, one may encounter sufferings that seem to be not directly due to kammā
vipāka. For example, one may have breathing problems because one’s body has excess phlegm
(semha). So, it appears that the cause of breathing problems is excess phlegm. But there is a
root cause for phlegm to be present at high levels in one’s body, and that is a past kammā. The
same is true for bile (pita), gas (vāta), body fluids (sannipāta), change in climate (utu), careless
behavior (visama), others’ harmful actions (opakkama).
11. There are three Suttas (SN 36.21, AN 5.104, and AN 10.60) that the reader Siebe mentioned in
the discussion forum (“Could Bodily Pain be due Causes Other Than Kamma Vipāka?“, that list 8
such possible “secondary causes” for bodily pain:
§ One should read that discussion topic to get a good understanding of how this discussion
evolved, but let me briefly describe the background.
12. Those other seven “causes” (except kammā) are not root causes. They all have past kammā as
the root cause. Nothing in this world happens without a connection somewhere to the six root causes:
lobha, dosa, moha, and alobha, adosa, amoha.
§ One may get an idea to stand on one’s leg. But if one is mindful, one can see the bodily pain
associated with that action and decide not to go through with it. Note that the kammā vipāka in
this case came initially as a mental input (through mana indriya). But one has the CHOICE not
to go along with that. Therefore, a second kammā of actually standing on one leg (one’s
willingness to go along with it) is needed for the kāya vedanā to arise.
§ The first case above in #10 (cancer etc) illustrates the vipāka solely attributed to past kammā.
Pain due to standing on a leg is also an immediate kammā vipāka. Other cases involve those
vipāka arising due to the seven other types of causes that are discussed in the Suttas mentioned
in #11.
13. Therefore, sometimes it may not be easy to figure out what is cause and what is effect,
because result of a past action itself can act as a (new) cause.
§ The above example of standing on one’s leg is a good example. The kāya vedanā WOULD
NOT arise, unless one let the initial kammā vipāka (came through the mana indriya) to proceed.
One has the ability to stop that kāya vedanā from arising.
§ On the other hand, one cannot stop the cancer by will. One could take actions (called upakkama
or prayoga) to alleviate a bodily vedanā due to a kammā vipāka. By the way, upakkama is one
of the eight mentioned loosely as causes in those Suttas that mention possible eight causes for
kammā vipāka.
14. Those upkkama or prayoga can work in the following way too. An upakkama by person A, may
cause harm to person B. For example, when person B detonate a suicide bomb, person A may die as a
result of that action.
§ But here again, person A MUST have a pending kammā vipāka for that action by person B to
cause harm for him. As I have mentioned many times, we have collected innumerable kammā
vipāka and they are waiting for such conditions to appear to give vipāka.
§ (Twenty four such conditions are listed and discussed in “Paṭṭhāna Dhammā“. So far, I have
discussed only a few).
§ Some people escape such attacks “miraculously”. There is no miracle, just the fact the there
may not have been a suitable kammā vipāka waiting to be ripened, OR, a past good kammā
could overcome even some pending bad vipāka.
§ This is why the Buddha said that it is impossible for a human to figure out the causes for
kammā vipāka.
§ Another such special case is the demise of all living beings in the realms BELOW the
abhassara brahma realm at the destruction of the “material world” (loka vināsaya); over a long
time period all being in the lower realms are reborn in higher realms above the abhassara
brahma realm until a new world (new Earth in our case) is formed over billions of years. We
will not get to discuss this for a while, since more background material is needed.
15. One would think that the Buddha’s good kammā done in his last life would be more than enough
to override any kammā vipāka from the past. However, remnants of vipāka of an anantariya kammā
were there, and also there could have been other strong kammā. That is the only exception, and that is
the kammā vipāka listed among the eight other possible causes. The other seven are really not the
root causes, but actually effects that appear as causes.
§ Then one can start on the Noble Eightfold Path AFTER learning about the deeper level of
micchā diṭṭhi. That is to realize that it is a wrong view to believe that things in this world can
bring long-term happiness. This second level of wrong views are dispelled when one
comprehends Tilakkhaṇa, the Three Characteristics of this world: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ The strongest immoral deeds are done by the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi. They inevitably lead to
suffering and can lead to rebirth in the apāyas.
18. One can attain Nibbāna only by getting rid of the second level of micchā diṭṭhi, i.e, only by
comprehending Tilakkhaṇa. Thus ultimate and permanent happiness can be attained only by
getting rid of second level of micchā diṭṭhi.
§ Both types of micchā diṭṭhi are discussed in the post: “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and
Sotāpanna Stage“.
4.9.1.3 Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means
February 25, 2017; revised January 3, 2018; September 23, 2018; November 1, 2018; July 25,
2019
1. “Mental formations” and “formations” are conventional translation for saṅkhāra. Certainly the
latter is a better translation. But it is much better to grasp the idea of saṅkhāra and just use that word.
I recommend the same for most key Pāli words like saññā and viññāṇa.
§ It comes from “san” + “khāra” or actions that involve “san”; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of
Sansāra (or Samsāra)“.
§ However, all saṅkhāra arise in the mind. When they lead to conscious thinking or speech, they
are called vacī saṅkhāra; those that lead to bodily actions are kāya saṅkhāra; those that arise
automatically in the mind are mano saṅkhāra.
§ Therefore, “san” is associated with anything that one is thinking about doing or actually doing.
§ Saṅkhāra are responsible for just getting things done to live the current life (everyday
activities). They can also lead to moral/immoral actions that can bring results (vipāka) in
future lives.
§ The latter type (those that can bring vipāka in future) are called strong saṅkhāra or
abhisaṅkhāra.
2. Let us look at some examples now.
§ Thinking about going to the bathroom is a vacī saṅkhāra (kammically neutral). One gets the
body to move to the toilet using kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Thinking about killing a human being and carrying it out is a saṅkhāra with great kammic
consequences or a vacī abhisaṅkhāra; doing the actual killing is done with kāya abhisaṅkhāra.
Such vacī or kāya abhisaṅkhāra are apuñña abhisaṅkhāra (or apuññābhisaṅkhāra). They can
lead to a birth in the apāyas.
§ On the other hand, puñña abhisaṅkhāra (or puññābhisaṅkhāra) (thoughts responsible for
proper speech and actions) have good kammic consequences and can lead to “good births”.
Even more importantly, they are essential for making progress on the Path.
§ Good or bad kammā are done via those types of saṅkhāra. They can bring results (kamma
vipāka) immediately, in this life, or in future lives. However, not all kammā lead to kamma
vipāka; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
3. The word saṅkhāra is commonly used to indicate those with kammic consequences, as in “avijjā
paccayā saṅkhāra“, where it really means, “avijjā paccayā apuññābhi saṅkhāra“ or “avijjā paccayā
puññābhi saṅkhāra“.
§ Here abhi saṅkhāra means “strong saṅkhāra”, and the word apuññābhi comes from “apuñña”
+ “abhi“, which combine to rhyme as apuññābhi. Here “apuñña” means “bad” or
“immoral”.Thus, apuññābhi saṅkhāra means strong immoral saṅkhāra.
§ In the same way, puñña + abhi + saṅkhāra becomes puññābhi saṅkhāra (for strong good
saṅkhāra).
§ So, one really needs to pay attention to exactly what meaning need to be taken in a given case.
4. All our thoughts, speech, and bodily actions are based on saṅkhāra that arise in the mind.
Therefore, it is essential to realize that vacī saṅkhāra and kāya saṅkhāra also arise in the mind. One
speaks and acts based on those such thoughts.
§ Saṅkhāra are thoughts. Kammā are actions based on such thoughts.
§ Kāya saṅkhāra are “conscious thoughts” that make our bodies move. Killing, stealing, and
sexual misconduct are apuññabhi kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Vacī saṅkhāra are “conscious thoughts that we silently generate” and also those thoughts that
lead to a speech by moving the lips, tongue, etc. Hate speech is due to apuññābhi vacī
saṅkhāra. Thinking about a Dhamma concept is a puññābhi vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct
Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra”.
§ On the other hand, mano saṅkhāra are “unconscious thoughts” that arise automatically. We are
not aware of when they appear. They arise due to our gati (character/habits) and can indicate
our level of moha or avijjā. Since they arise unconsciously, mano saṅkhāra are unlikely to be
abhisaṅkhāra that have substantial kammic consequences.
§ The fact that cetanā plays a vital role is evident when we look at the following definitions:
“kāya sancetanā kāya saṅkhāra“, “vacī sancetanā vacī saṅkhāra“, and “mano sancetanā mano
saṅkhāra“.
5. Let us take some examples to illustrate these three types of saṅkhāra.
§ To move the body, the mind or the mental body or the gandhabba must first generate thoughts
about moving the body. Then that thought is executed with the help of the brain that sends
necessary signals to the leg muscles, say, to move the legs.
§ So, those kāya saṅkhāra are responsible for moving the legs. Now, if the purpose of moving the
body was to go somewhere to commit an evil deed, then it becomes an apuñña abhisaṅkhāra.
These thoughts would have asobhana cetasika (like greed or hate) in them.
§ If the purpose were to go somewhere to do a good deed, then it would become a puññabhi
saṅkhāra. These thoughts would have sobhana cetasika (like faith and compassion) in them.
§ If the purpose were to go the bathroom (kammically neutral), then it would be just a kāya
saṅkhāra, not an abhisaṅkhāra. Breathing involves moving body parts (lungs), done without
conscious thinking, but they are kāya saṅkhāra too. Those thoughts would not have sobhana or
asobhana cetasika in them.
§ Therefore, the kammic nature of an act is decided by the intention that is in the mind, i.e., type
of cetasika (mental factors) that arise with those thoughts; see, “What is Intention in Kamma?“.
6. Now, if a person gets angry at another person, he may not move any body parts, but may generate
evil thoughts like: “I wish I could hit this person right now”). Those are vacī saṅkhāra; see “Correct
Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ When those vacī saṅkhāra build-up energy, one may actually say those words out. They are
still called vacī saṅkhāra.
§ Whether one is just talking to oneself or actually speaks out such evil words, they are both
apuñña abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Of course, vacī saṅkhāra can be puñña abhisaṅkhāra too. Person X watching a good deed by
person Y, may be generating good thoughts about Y; those are puñña vacī saṅkhāra.
§ Those also will be distinguished by the type of cetasika as in kāya saṅkhāra above.
7. Whether they are vacī or kāya saṅkhāra, if they have asobhana cetasika in them, they tend “heat
up” or “stress” the mind (Pāli word is “thāpa“).
§ On the other hand, if sobhana cetasika arise as vacī or kāya saṅkhāra, they have the tend to
“cool” a mind.
§ In the earlier post, “What Are Kilesa (Mental Impurities)? – Connection to Cetasika “, it was
discussed in detail why understanding this fact is the pre-requisite for the Satipaṭṭhāna
bhāvanā; see, “Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life“, and “Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta – Structure“.
§ Just by comprehending this fact, one can start cultivating nirāmisa sukha.
8. All other thoughts that arise in the mind without conscious thinking are mano saṅkhāra.
§ For example, when one gets hit by a cane, say, one feels the pain associated with it, and one
realizes that another person hitting with a cane caused the pain. So, the mano saṅkhāra that
arise at the beginning have two cetasika of saññā (recognition of what happened) and vedanā
(pain caused). Another way to say it: mano saṅkhāra are involved in the vipāka stage.
§ However, based on that “sense input” of getting hit, now one could start generating vacī
saṅkhāra and even kāya saṅkhāra. Those vacī saṅkhāra may involve just creating evil thoughts
about that person or actually saying bad things to him. If the pain was intense, one might
generating bad kāya saṅkhāra and hit that person.
9. So, it is essential to realize that all of the following involve thoughts : automatically thinking
(mano saṅkhāra), “just talking to oneself” or speaking out (vacī saṅkhāra), or using the body
movements (kāya saṅkhāra).
§ Those thoughts arise in the gandhabba, and become the commands to the brain to carry out the
tasks of speaking and body movement. That is how the mental body (gandhabba) controls the
physical body; see, “Our Mental Body – Gandhabba“.
10. Those initial mano saṅkhāra are automatically in mind due to one’s gati. Then subsequent vacī
and kāya saṅkhāra are generated, and we do have control over those; see, for example, “Correct
Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ So, the seeds for thinking, speaking, and acting start at the instant of the first sense input, say,
seeing something or hearing something that gets one’s attention.
§ If the sense input is substantial (and one gets interested in it via like or dislike), one will start
many such citta vīthi in a short time. This leads to corresponding vacī and kāya saṅkhāra to
“talk to oneself”, speak out, or to do bodily actions.
11. Without getting into details, conscious thinking that could lead to speaking and physical actions
occur in the seven javana citta in a citta vīthi.
§ Vacī or kāya saṅkhāra arise due to many citta vīthi running one after another. As we discussed
previously, billions of citta vīthi can run in a second; see, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a
Thought (Citta)“.
§ Another critical point is that the javana citta in subsequent citta vīthi get stronger and stronger.
This is why when we start thinking about a person that we like or dislike, we can keep
generating increasingly stronger feelings about the situation.
§ Sometimes, we can see people getting angry by the minute. They are generating a lot of vacī
saṅkhāra even without getting a word out. But one can see the person getting highly agitated:
the face gets red and facial expression can show how angry he/she has become.
12. Therefore, even if we may start generating vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, we may not become aware of
it for a short time. If one gets angry one may lose control and may not even realize that one is getting
into a bad situation.
§ “Catching oneself early” in the process of becoming angry is the key to control anger
management. When one understands how this process happens and that it can escalate quickly
into a bad situation, one can determine to catch it earlier next time.
§ We can prevent a lot of suffering in this life by catching such vacī and kāya saṅkhāra early.
15. We first need to pay attention to those “samphassa jā vedanā” that arise due to immoral thoughts,
i.e., due to immoral vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ Suppose person X starts generating bad vacī saṅkhāra because he is verbally abused by enemy
Y. Those vacī saṅkhāra give rise to a “bad state of mind” or domanassa via “samphassa jā
vedanā“. If the situation escalates, stronger vacī saṅkhāra, i.e., thoughts of hitting Y, may arise
and may lead to kāya saṅkhāra of hitting Y.
16. On the other hand, when one is eating a delicious food, one will taste it as pleasant, whether one
is an average human or an Arahant. It is a “kama guna” associated with the human realm; see, “Kāma
Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha“. That is not an immoral thought.
§ The difference is that while a normal human will have craving for that food, an Arahant will
not.
§ One generates mano saṅkhāra automatically based on one’s gati. Then, conscious vacī
saṅkhāra and kāya saṅkhāra lead to the critical upādāna (willingly binding) stage; see,
“Difference Between Tanhā and Upādāna“.
17. All this is put together at the viññāṇa stage. The discussion on viññāṇa will complete our
simplified discussion on the four aggregates that are associated with the mind or the mental body,
gandhabba; see, “Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
§ Furthermore, we will see that vedanā (excluding “samphassa jā vedanā“) and saññā are
associated with mano saṅkhāra, which arise automatically due to kamma vipāka.
§ Starting with those mano saṅkhāra, we then consciously generate vacī and kāya saṅkhāra
initiating new kamma. Furthermore, “samphassa jā vedanā” arise during that process.
§ When kamma vipāka, in turn, lead to making new kamma (thus giving rise to more kamma
vipāka), the whole process repeats itself over and over. This is how the rebirth process rolls on
forever unless one determines to stop initiating new kamma, especially strong immoral kamma
via apuññābhi vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
18. I recently came across the following “wise words” on the internet:
§ Watch your thoughts; they become words.
§ Watch your words; they become actions.
§ Watch your actions; they become habits.
§ Watch your habits; they become your character.
§ Watch your character; it becomes your destiny.
Those statements summarize what I have been trying to explain above and also in posts on Paticca
Samuppāda. Our thoughts or saṅkhāra define and guide our destiny.
Difference between saṅkhāra and dhammā at, “Difference Between Dhammā and Saṅkhāra“.
4.9.2 Rūpa Aggregate
All our conscious thoughts start with one of the six senses getting an input from the external world
that is made up of rūpa.
1. Many people think rūpa means just “material things” that we can see out in the world. But
EVERYTHING that we sense through our six senses are rūpa. I will explain this in a systematic way.
§ Those things that we detect with our five physical senses are what we can call “dense rūpa“;
they are made of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], i.e, they are made of satara mahā bhūta
(patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo).; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
§ Those rūpa that we detect with the mana indriya are called “dhammā“. These are just energies
and have not condensed to the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] level, i.e., they are below the
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage.
§ It is good to remember that dhamma refers to a doctrine (like in Buddha Dhamma) and
dhammā refers to those very fine rupā.
§ Let us discuss those two types of rūpa in detail first.
2. All things that we experience through our SIX senses are rūpa, but the first FIVE types of
sense inputs come through five “sensors” obvious to everyone (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and
body). The SIXTH one called mana indriya (located in the brain) is not known to science. This is
clearly stated in the Cha Chakka Sutta, as discussed below.
§ All six types are eventually EXPERIENCED by the mind, i.e., with citta (thoughts) with
cetasika (mental factors) in them.
§ For details how the sensory inputs that come through the six “sense doors” are experienced by
the mind, see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“.
3. Those that we experience through our FIVE physical senses (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the
body) are “dense rūpa,” meaning they are made of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], which are made of
the four great elements or the “satara mahā bhūta.”
§ Those five kinds of rūpa are all in our “rūpa loka,” which is what we are quite used to seeing,
hearing, smelling, tasting, and making bodily contacts with.
§ What we touch with our body or see with our eyes are the rūpa that are familiar to everyone;
they are sometimes called “rūpa rūpa” or “vanna rūpa” (varna rūpa in Sinhala or Sanskrit) to
distinguish from other four types.
§ However, we need light to “see” those “rūpa rūpa.” Light consists of tiny particles called
photons; they have very small masses due to their energies.
4. Now, let us look at the other four types of rūpa that we detect with our ears, noses, tongues.
§ It is easy to see that what we taste are also “rūpa rūpa,” i.e., solid food or liquids.
§ What we detect with the nose are scents, which are really very small particulates. So, they are
also “rūpa rūpa.”
§ When we hear sounds, our ears detect disturbances in the air due to that sound. Sound,
therefore, involves energy, just like light. Sometimes sound energy is attributed to energy
packets called “phonons.”
5. Therefore, detection of rūpa in the “rūpa loka” involve matter or energy, and all those are above
the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage.
§ Yes. The light particles or photons are also made of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka].
§ They are above the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage, so one can see how minute a
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is; it is much, much smaller than an atom in modern science.
§ For example, a photon in the visible range (which is a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]) is a billion
times less massive than a hydrogen atom, the smallest atom. That is like the mass difference
between a grain of sand an average airplane.
§ A suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] could be a billion times smaller than that photon.
6. This is actually another example of how Buddha was ahead of modern science 2500 years ago. He
had categorized all five “objects” sensed by the five physical senses as “rūpa” made up of
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. It was only about 100 years ago that science identified photons as
particles, with the advent of quantum mechanics.
§ Even many physicists did not accept the particle nature of light until the single-photon
detection experiments of Grainger, Roger, and Aspect in 1986: WebLink: PDF file: Grainger et
al-Experimental Evidence for a Photon Anticorrelation Effect-1986
§ Now it is accepted that light is made up of particles called photons.
7. Now let us think about what else we experience, other than those detected with the five physical
senses. Imagine someone trapped in a cell with soundproof walls with no light inside and nothing in
that room except its walls.
§ That person can only touch the walls. He cannot see, hear, smell, or taste anything.
§ But touch is not the only sense experience he has. He can think about anything he wants to. He
can think about past events and he can think about what can take place in the future.
§ Those thoughts do not come at random, but due to kamma vipāka. Of course one can willingly
recall them too. They are his memories and future hopes, among others. This is the part that
most people don’t even consider.
8. As we discussed above, those are the finer rūpa detected by the mind lie below the suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] stage. They are detected by the mana indriya in the brain (another fact unknown to
science), and subsequently sensed by the mind.
§ Kamma beeja — that are generated by our minds (via our thoughts) — are also part of dhammā.
They bring kamma vipāka back to from time to time. These are what we think of as “random
thoughts” that come to us about things and people.
§ Those dhammā are not coarse enough to be “seeing” even with abhiññā powers and do not
make contact with other five coarse senses. Thus they are called, “anidassan appatighan
dhammayatana pariyapanna rūpan.”
§ Here, “anidassana” means “cannot be seen” and “appatigha” means “cannot be touched or
sensed with even the finest instrument”. And, “dhammayatana pariyapanna rūpan” means “can
make contact only with the dhammayatana or mana indriya”; see, “What are Dhamma? – A
Deeper Analysis.”
9. We see a person when light reflected off of that person comes to our eyes. We hear a sound when
the air disturbances due to that sound reach our ears. We smell a scent when tiny particulates of scent
reach our noses. We taste food when food particles make contact with our tongues.
§ So, we have five physical “sensors” on our bodies to detect those five five sense inputs. They
are eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and our bodies. They are called cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, and
kāya indriya.
§ The sixth sense that we have is called the mana indriya. It is located in the brain, but I have not
yet been able to identify it with the known components in the brain. Of course, scientists do not
think about it that way. This is how the Buddha described it.
10. We detect “dhammā” with the mana indriya, just like we detect pictures with cakkhu indriya or
sounds with sota indriya (ears). But all these sense inputs are “felt” by the mind (hadaya vatthu)
located close to the physical heart; see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body.”
§ These dhammā are also rūpa in Buddha Dhamma, but they are even more fine than those light
particles or photons.
§ “Dhammā” are just energies that lie BELOW the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage. They
cannot be detected with even the finest scientific instrument.
§ That person locked up in an isolated room generates thoughts about his past or future, when
dhammā that represent such past events or future hopes make contact with the mana indriya.
11. Just like the dense rūpa that we detect with our five physical senses are in our “rūpa loka“, these
dhammā (which are the same as kamma beeja) are in our “mano loka”; see, “Our Two Worlds:
Material and Immaterial.”
§ This mano loka is also called “bhava“, because that is where one’s kamma beeja are, as we
mentioned above in #8. We all have numerous kamma beeja that can give rise to a variety of
bhava at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment, when a new bhava is grasped (the strongest kamma beeja
corresponding to an appropriate bhava is selected).
§ Of course, kamma vipāka during a given life also arise due to smaller kamma beeja, as
mentioned above.
§ When these kamma beeja lose their energy over long times, they become just “records” , i.e.,
they cannot bring any more vipāka, but become just “memories.”
12. So, these dhammā (or kamma beeja) are rūpa that are below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
stage, and are in our “mano loka” or “mental world”, as opposed to those dense rūpa that are in our
“material world” or “rūpa loka“.
§ The “mental world” is all around us, just like the “material word”, but of course we cannot “see
it”, just like we cannot “see” all those radio, television, and cell phone signals that are all
around us.
§ But we do know that those radio, television, and cell phone signals are there, because we can
receive them with our radios, TVs, and cell phones. Just the same way, we receive those
“dhammā” with our mana indriya.
§ One may be engaged in some task, say washing dishes in the kitchen, but all of a sudden a
thought may come to mind about a friend far away, or some incident at work. That is due to
“dhammā” impinging on mana indriya due to kamma vipāka.
§ In addition, we can recall such memories at our will too.
13. Those who are familiar with Abhidhamma know that a “seeing event” is a sense input through the
eyes: “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“, i.e., “eye consciousness arises when a
rūpa rupā (with the aid of light) impinges on the eyes”.
§ Similarly, hearing is due to: “sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ,” etc. for other
physical senses of ghāṇa (smell), jivhā (taste), and kāya (body).
§ Finally, detection of dhammā with the mana indriya is stated as, “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca
uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ.”
14. We also need to realize that “dhammā” can have somewhat different meaning too, depending on
the where used.
§ Buddha Dhamma means a teachings of the Buddha. Here it is normally written as “Dhamma”,
but some do write it as Buddha Dhammā.
§ So, we need to take the appropriate meaning of a given word depending on the context.
15. For those who are familiar with Abhdhamma, we can state the above with Abhdhamma language
as follows. According to Buddha Dhamma EVERYTHING in existence can be put into four ultimate
realities (paramatthatha):
§ Thoughts (citta)
§ Thought qualities or mental factors (cetasika)
§ Matter (rūpa) which includes energy and dhammā
§ Nibbāna
16. As we will see later, it is these dhammā that eventually lead to the formation of those dense rūpa
that we enjoy with our five physical senses.
These dense rūpa have finite lifetimes (they areimpermanent). In addition, they change
unpredictably during their existence and that is called viparinama lakkhana.
§ But no matter how hard one tries, one is unable to maintain those dense rūpa to one’s
satisfaction (anicca). Thus, those dense rūpa lead to more suffering than any pleasure.
§ Five types of dense rūpa are in our “rūpa loka”, the less dense dhammā are in our “mano
loka”; see, “Our Two Worlds: Material and Mental.”
§ A living being exists to experience those dense rūpa and hopes to enjoy them with the mind
(with citta and cetasika). That is the basis of existence in a sentence.
17. The Buddha said, “sabbe dhammā |anattā|,” i.e., “all dhammā are without essence at the end” and
must be given up to attain Nibbāna. But that cannot be done by sheer will power: One has to
comprehend the true nature — Tilakkhanna — to see the real nature of all rūpa, including dhammā.
§ We make our own world by creating dhammā our own. That is a critical point that I will try to
explain in future posts in this “Living Dhamma” section.
§ The basis for making dhammā are our thoughts with javana citta. Those javana generate
“kamma beeja” and they give rise to future kamma vipāka. So, those kamma beeja are dhammā.
They are very tiny packets of energy below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage.
§ But some javana (especially in jhāna samapatti) can create energies above the suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] stage, i.e., they can produce tangible rūpa. That is how one with abhiññā
powers can “create” physical objects.
18. Any rūpa (including those kamma beeja) that one makes for oneself, cannot be maintained to
one’s satisfaction.
§ Any rūpa with energy will eventually be destroyed, or that energy will wear out. Furthermore,
those rūpa can and will change unexpectedly while in existence too; that is the viparinama
characteristic and is a root cause of suffering.
§ The only dhammās that are “permanent” are nama gotta, records of our saṅkhāra, which do
not have energy in them; “Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Thalaya (Mind
Plane).”
19. When one sees the perils of this rebirth process (after one grasps the Tilakkhaṇa), one stops
making those causes via abhisaṅkhāra, and also gives up the craving (taṇhā) for them, which leads to
Nibbāna.
§ Nibbāna results when all those causes are removed, no rūpa can arise. Hence Nibbāna is
permanent. No more suffering!
20. Finally, our six sense inputs (āyatana) and the six types of rūpa that we experience with them are
discussed in several suttas. For example, in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Cha Chakka Sutta (MN
148)“:
“Cha ajjhattikāni āyatanāni veditabbānī’ti—iti kho panetaṃ vuttaṃ. Kiñcetaṃ paṭicca vuttaṃ?
Cakkhāyatanaṃ, sotāyatanaṃ, ghānāyatanaṃ, jivhāyatanaṃ, kāyāyatanaṃ, manāyatanaṃ. ‘Cha
ajjhattikāni āyatanāni veditabbānī’ti—iti yaṃ taṃ vuttaṃ, idametaṃ paṭicca vuttaṃ. Idaṃ paṭhamaṃ
chakkaṃ. (1)”
“Cha bāhirāni āyatanāni veditabbānī’ti—iti kho panetaṃ vuttaṃ. Kiñcetaṃ paṭicca vuttaṃ?
Rūpāyatanaṃ, saddāyatanaṃ, gandhāyatanaṃ, rasāyatanaṃ, phoṭṭhabbāyatanaṃ,
dhammāyatanaṃ. ‘Cha bāhirāni āyatanāni veditabbānī’ti—iti yaṃ taṃ vuttaṃ, idametaṃ paṭicca
vuttaṃ. Idaṃ dutiyaṃ chakkaṃ. (2)”
§ Thus, there are six (Cha) internal āyatana (ajjhattikāni āyatanāni) and six external āyatana
(bāhirāni āyatanāni).
§ The sixth internal āyatana is manāyatana, and it detects dhamma (called manāyatana, just like
sadda or sound is called saddāyatana).
A more in-depth analysis of dhammā is at, “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis.”
4.9.2.2 Bhūta and Yathābhūta – What Do They Really Mean
December 28, 2017
1. Yathābhūta is normally translated as “true nature” (which is a bit close to the true meaning). From
that, it seems, bhūta is translated as “nature”; sometimes bhūta is translated as “becoming”. Both are
wrong.
§ These words are also associated with yathābhūta ñāṇa. By the end of this discussion one will
know what that ñāṇa or wisdom is about.
2. Bhūta is a Sinhala word as well as a Pāli word. It literally means a “ghost”. The deeper meaning is
associated with the “satara mahā bhūta”: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo.
§ One cannot ever see those satara mahā bhūta individually. The smallest unit containing any of
them is a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], which consists of those four (patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo)
AND varna, gandha, rasa, oja. Thus a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] (“suddha” + “ashta”
where “suddha” is pure or fundamental and “ashta” is eight) means “pure octad” or “pure unit
of eight”. How a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is formed is discussed in “The Origin of Matter
– Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]”.
§ It should also be noted that satara mahā bhūta are the primary rūpa. All others, including
varna, gandha, rasa, oja, are derived from them and are called upādaya rūpa.
3. As mentioned in that post, bhūta have their origins in “gathi”. When one cultivates a certain gathi
and when they become strong, they can lead to the creation of bhūta (suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka])
produced via their javana citta.
§ So, in order to get a good understanding of these key words, one needs to know about gathi (I
have sometimes spelled as gati), which is discussed in many posts at the site. For example, see,
“Gati, Bhava, and Jāti“.
4. Scientists have now verified the illusive nature of matter at very small scale. Atoms were thought
to be the smallest possible division of matter until 1897 when J.J. Thomson discovered the electron.
Then it was realized that an atom is made of smaller units (protons, neutrons, and electrons), and then
those were found to have structure too, but they sub-units (quarks, etc) cannot be detected
individually).
§ With the advent of quantum mechanics, the distinction between matter and energy has become
blurred. The mass of a particle depends on its speed, and its mass when it is at rest is the
smallest. Photons or “particles of light” have zero mass at rest, i.e., zero rest mass. It is now
typical to state the mass of an elementary particle in terms of energy units.
§ It has become clear that matter has an illusive nature when tried to figure out the “smallest
units” from which all matter is composed of.
5. Furthermore, it is not possible to determine the exact position of an elementary particle at a given
time. For example, it is only possible to say that an electron can be within a certain region of space.
Thus, an electron is like a ghost. It cannot be pinned down to be at a certain location.
§ The situation is even worse for a photon, a particle of light. When a photon is released, one can
only find it at a later time by stopping it at a detector. It is IMPOSSIBLE to state the exact path
of the photon from the source to the detector. It could have been anywhere in between. The
same applies to an electron too, even though it has a non-zero rest mass.
§ This has been referred to as “quantum weirdness”. Those small particles are as elusive as
ghosts.
6. That is exactly what the Buddha said. A suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is much smaller than even a
photon, and the Buddha said that satara mahā bhūta are the true “smallest units of matter”. This is
why he called them bhūta. One can NEVER see them or detect them individually. As we mentioned
above, the smallest unit of rūpa, or a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] consists of eight sub units.
§ Furthermore, these bhūta arise from gathi of living beings (mostly human and above); see,
“The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]”. A person with rough character
qualities is likely to create suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] with higher proportion of patavi, etc.
7. No one will be able to “see” or figure out how gathi are transformed to bhūta or suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka] stage. Only a Buddha can discern that.
§ Billions of billions of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] are combined to lead to the mahā bhūta
stage of rūpa. Brahmas have bodies made of mahā bhūta. Only brahmas can see such fine
rūpa.
§ When large number of mahā bhūta combine, that leads to the dhātu stage of rūpa. Bodies of
devas are at fine dhātu stage. Our human bodies are made of much denser dhātu stage of rūpa.
8. All mater that we see are made of such dense dhātu. Rocks have dhātu that have mostly patavi.
Water mostly has āpo. Fire mostly has tejo, Wind mostly had vāyo. That is why earth, water, fire,
wind are loosely referred to as patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo.
9. When someone comprehends what we discussed above about the true nature of matter that exists in
this world, one is said to have the yathābhūta ñāṇa. However, just reading about them is just the start.
That ñāṇa grows as one comprehends the finer details.
§ Yathā means the true nature. Yathābhūta means the true nature of matter or true nature of
bhūta, which arise via the MIND. Of course, more finer details need a good understanding of
Abhidhamma.
§ However, for most purposes, it is sufficient to have the above discussed rough idea. As one
learns more, the details will be automatically filled in.
10. This is also why the Buddha said, “mano pubbangamā dhammā, mano settā manomayā” in the
famous Dhammapada gāthā.
§ It means “everything in this world has its origins in the mind, all are set by the mind and
prepared by the mind”.
11. Suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] by themselves are inert. They acquire “life” when energized by the
mind in the formation of “kammaja rūpa”. This energy in embedded as rotation (paribramana) and
spin (bramana). When that embedded energy runs out, rotation and spin stop and they again become
inert.
§ For example, a hadaya vatthu for a new existence comes into being as a kammaja rūpa at the
cuti-paṭisandhi moment. During its lifetime, the hadaya vatthu maintains its spin and rotation.
When the kammic energy embedded is exhausted, its motion stops and the bhava ends. At that
time, a new hadaya vatthu for a new bhava is formed by kammic energy.
12. The hadaya vatthu is also called “vatthu dasaka” where dasaka means ten. This is because the
hadaya vatthu or vatthu dasaka has two modes of energy (spin and rotation) in addition to the 8 parts
in the inert suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. That why it is called a dasaka (made of ten units).
§ This added spin and rotation is what gives life to an inert suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. That
power of energy is given by javana citta (mind). The more energy given to a kamma beeja, it
will sustain a bhava (hadaya vatthu) that arises from it for a longer time.
§ Same is true for the five pasāda rūpa (cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, kāya) formed at the moment
of cuti-paṭisandhi. There are two bhava rūpa which are also dasaka, and jivitindriya rūpa
which is a navaka (just spin or bramana). How different modes of rotation and spin give rise to
these nine “life forming” basic units is discussed in the post: “Gandhabba Sensing the World –
With and Without a Physical Body“.
§ By the way, the word kammaja comes from “kamma” + “ja” where “ja” means birth. Therefore,
those nine kammaja rūpa are created by kammic energy.
13. Now we can clearly see that our heavy physical body, by itself, is totally inert. The real life is in
the gandhabba with the hadaya vatthu and the five pasāda rūpa. Our body movements are controlled
by the kāya dasaka of the gandhabba and it is spread like a very fine mesh over the whole body.
§ At the death of the physical body, this life-carrying gandhabba leaves the body and the body
becomes inert and starts decaying.
§ In the case of an out-of-body experience (OBE), even though the gandhabba leaves the
physical body, it is still connected to the physical body (by a “silver cord” in the terminology of
astral projection) and that is why the body does not start to decay: “Manomaya Kāya and Out-
of-Body Experience (OBE)“.
14. Therefore, in all life forms in the 31 realms the real life is in the ultra-fine life form of a hadaya
vatthu accompanied by up to five pasāda rūpa. In arupavaccara brahma realms, there is only the
hadaya vatthu. In rupavacara brahma realms, hadaya vatthu is accompanied by cakkhu and sota
pasāda rūpa. In all other realms, five pasāda rūpa exist with the hadaya vatthu.
§ The only exception is asañña realm, where only the kāya dasaka is maintained by the
jivitindriya (no hadaya vatthu, since thoughts are not generated).
§ This is another critical factor in the yathābhūta ñāṇa: All life forms are like bhūta (ghosts);
in essence, life is maintained by a ultra-fine body that is impossible to see and have temporary
existence. Any life in any realm is short-lived in the samsāric scale. In the samsāric scale
trillion years is like a drop of water in the ocean.
15. This yathābhūta ñāṇa about the real nature of our body also helps to get rid of the “ghāṇa saññā”
about our bodies. One values one’s dense body so much because one believes that there is a “self” in
the physical body.
§ Those with ucceda diṭṭhi (like most current scientists and philosophers) believe that our
physical body (and its brain) is all that is there.
§ Those with sāssata diṭṭhi believe that there is a mental body that lives forever.
16. Buddha discovered that both those are wrong views. There is a mental body, but it drastically
changes from bhava to bhava. One could be a deva or a human for a time being, but the next bhava
could be in the apāyas.
§ There is nothing in our physical body worth to be taken as “mine”.
§ When one comprehends this fact, sakkāya diṭṭhi (which is one of four conditions to attain the
Sotāpanna stage) is removed. However, it is just one way to remove sakkāya diṭṭhi.
§ This aspect is discussed in “WebLink: suttacentral: Mūlapariyāya Sutta (MN 1)“, “WebLink:
suttacentral: Kaccānagotta Sutta (SN 12.15)“, AND “WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā
Hatthipadopama Sutta (MN 28)“, among others.
17. Now we see that the precursors for all matter in this world, satara mahā bhūta, are mind-made
and have a transient existence. They are “bhūta” or “ghosts”. And since everything else is made of
them, what we consider to be “solid, tangible things” in this world are really “ghost-like”.
§ The knowledge of this real “ghost-like” nature is called “yathābhūta ñāṇa“. When one has that
knowledge, one looks at the world according that correct view, which is called “anu bhūtam“.
§ When one is not aware of this true nature, it is called “na anu bhūtam” which rhymes as
“ananubhūtam”. It is to noted that many key Pāli words are composed that way: anatta is “na” +
“atta“; see, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?“.
§ Anantariya is “na” + “an” + “antara“. Words like this cannot be analyzed grammatically. This
is why current Pāli experts are wrong in interpreting such words (and are unable to interpret
many key words).
§ This word “ananubhūtam” comes in several key suttas, including the ones mentioned above in
#16.
18. One good example is the famous WebLink: suttacentral: Brahmanimantanika Sutta (Majjhima
Nikāya 49): “Viññāṇaṃ anidassanaṃ anantaṃ sabbato pabhaṃ, taṃ pathaviyā pathavattena
ananubhūtaṃ, āpassa āpattena ananubhūtaṃ, tejassa tejattena ananubhūtaṃ, vāyassavāyattena
ananubhūtaṃ, bhūtānaṃ bhūtattena ananubhūtaṃ, devānaṃ devattena ananubhūtaṃ, pajāpatissa
pajāpatittena ananubhūtaṃ, brahmānaṃ brahmattena ananubhūtaṃ, ābhassarānaṃ
ābhassarattena ananubhūtaṃ, subhakiṇhānaṃ subhakiṇhānaṃ subhakiṇhattena ananubhūtaṃ,
vehapphalānaṃ vehapphalattena ananubhūtaṃ, abhibhussa abhibhuttena ananubhūtaṃ, sabbassa
sabbattena ananubhūtaṃ..”
Translated: “Viññāṇa is unseen, infinite, and leads to the rebirth process for all. With viññāṇa one
cannot comprehend the real nature of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, bhūta, deva, pajapti brahma, abhassara
brahma, subhakinha brahma, vehapphala brahma, etc. and everything in this world (sabba)”.
§ One has a defiled consciousness or viññāṇa until one attains the Arahantship. Until then one
cannot fully comprehend the real “ghost-like” nature of everything in this world, i.e., one’s
yathābhūta ñāṇa is not complete.
§ We will discuss the first part of the verse “Viññāṇaṃ anidassanaṃ anantaṃ sabbato pabhaṃ..”
in the next post. This short phrase is commonly mistranslated.
19. Another major sutta where it appears is “WebLink: suttacentral: Saḷāyatana Vibhaṅga Sutta (MN
137)“: “Rūpānaṃ tveva aniccataṃ viditvā vipariṇāmavirāganirodham, ‘pubbe ceva rūpā etarahi ca
sabbe te rūpā aniccā dukkhā vipariṇāmadhammā’ti evametaṃ yathābhūtaṃ sammappaññāya
passato uppajjati somanassaṃ“.
Loosely Translated: Any rūpa that has existed or in existence now, has the “ghost-like transient
nature”. That is the reason why they change unexpectedly (viparinama) and have the anicca nature.
When one comprehends this true nature, it leads to joy in one’s mind (somanassa)“.
It is a good idea to read the post, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” first.
1. Viññāṇa is the link between mind and matter, even though it is in the “nāma or mind category”
sometimes.
§ However, in the WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga, nāma is defined as only
the first three khandha: “Tattha katamaṃ nāmaṃ? Vedanākkhandho, saññākkhandho,
saṅkhārakkhandho—idaṃ vuccati “nāmaṃ”. This is a clear indication that viññāṇa khandha
does not really belong in the “nāma or mind category”.
§ Information in these posts on viññāṇa could be new to many readers, but are critically
important. If one can grasp them, one will have the “nāmarūpa paricceda ñana“ (knowledge
into mind and matter).
§ We will have a couple of more posts before making that critical connection.
2. So far in this subsection on the mental aggregates we have discussed saññā, vedanā, and saṅkhāra
in simple terms, mainly focusing on their relevance to stay on the Path. My main goal is to provide
the key and essential aspects of these terms so that one can clearly see “how to cool down the mind”
and progress towards Nibbāna.
§ Viññāṇa can be said to encompass (include) all those three mental categories: saññā, vedanā,
and saṅkhāra. So, we can say that viññāṇa is the overall effect our awareness encompassing our
perceptions (saññā) , feelings (vedanā), and our likes and dislikes (saṅkhāra).
§ But viññāṇa represents a bit more — mainly “our hopes and desires that we want to from this
world”. This is the more important aspect — which makes the connection with rūpa — that we
really need to understand, but first we need to know that there are two types of viññāṇa.
3. When we see something, a cakkhu viññāṇa arises. A split second later we may hear something and
sota viññāṇa arises. When we watch a movie, it seems like we are seeing and hearing at the same
time, but it only appears that way because our mind is so fast.
§ Basically six types of viññāṇa can arise via our six senses: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and
the mind, called cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, kāya, and mano viññāṇa. They are all vipāka
viññāṇa.
§ Therefore, vipāka viññāṇa can be six types and they will bring vipāka even for an Arahant
until the death of the physical body.
§ We don’t have control over them once they arise. But we can of course avoid some. For
example, if we don’t want to watch a movie, we can decide not to watch it.
4. Then, based on that vipāka viññāṇa, kamma viññāṇa CAN arise, IF we get attached to that vipāka
viññāṇa via greed, hate, or ignorance.
§ For example, person X may see a person Y that X dislikes. That seeing event is a vipāka, and
thus the viññāṇa generated is a vipāka viññāṇa.
§ But as soon as X sees Y, hateful thoughts may come to X’s mind, with which X can generate
NEW KAMMA. Those thoughts have kamma viññāṇa.
§ Those kamma viññāṇa are ALWAYS generated in the MIND, i.e., kamma viññāṇa are
ALWAYS mano viññāṇa, in contrast to vipāka viññāṇa which can be of all six varieties.
5. So, a vipāka viññāṇa can arise due to any of the six senses: by seeing a rūpa with eyes
(“cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“), hearing a sound with ears (“sotañca
paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ“),…dhamma with mana indriya (“manañca paṭicca
dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“).
§ Note that these vipāka viññāṇa are NOT generated via “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“. They are
ALWAYS generated via eyes seeing a rūpa, ears hearing sound, etc.
§ We are all familiar with how “visual awareness” or cakkhu viññāṇa arise due to seeing a rūpa,
auditory awareness arises due to hearing a sound, etc, but most of our vipāka viññāṇa arise due
to “mental awareness” or mano viññāṇa arising via dhamma impinging on the mana indriya;
see, “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ Note that those rūpa that we see with our eyes are really rūpa rūpa (or varna rūpa); they are
normally just called rūpa, but this can lead to confusion if someone is not aware of this detail.
6. In general, all we experience in this world are rūpa: rūpa rūpa, sadda rūpa, gandha rūpa, rasa
rūpa, pottabbha rūpa, and ALSO dhamma.
§ Dhamma are not called rūpa, simply because they are below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
stage. They have not yet “condensed” to the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage; see, “The
Origin of Matter – suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
§ They are very fine rūpa that cannot be seen or touched: “anidassanan appatighan“; see, “What
are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
7. To summarize: vipāka viññāṇa can arise at any of the six senses, and thus can be cakkhu, sota,
jivhā, ghāṇa, kāya, or mano viññāṇa.
§ If the vipāka viññāṇa is strong (i.e., if really like or really dislike what was experienced), then
because of avijjā, we start generating saṅkhāra about it, which lead to a viññāṇa that we create
on our own, a kamma viññāṇa.
§ Therefore, in contrast to vipāka viññāṇa, kamma viññāṇa arise via “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa“.
§ They start automatically as mano viññāṇa, via mano saṅkhāra. But then we consciously start
generating more via vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, and that will strengthen those kamma viññāṇa.
§ We have discussed how mano saṅkhāra arise automatically due to our gathi, and then we
consciously generate vacī and kāya saṅkhāra: “How Are Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into
Thoughts?“.
8. Let us first consider a couple of examples of vipāka viññāṇa.
§ We may get to eat a tasty food item. The experience of that food on the tongue generates taste
(jivhā viññāṇa), which is a vipāka viññāṇa. We got to taste that as a result of a previous good
kamma vipāka. That experience includes identifying what food it is (saññā), and the taste it
gives (vedanā).
§ If we get a headache, that is bad kāya viññāṇa that arose due to a past bad kamma, i.e., a kamma
vipāka. We know it is a headache (saññā), and we feel the pain (vedanā).
§ When the sense input first comes, we just become aware of it. There are no kamma done with
vipāka viññāṇa.
9. Based on those 6 types of vipāka viññāṇa that arise, we generate new mental states on our own.
These are called kamma viññāṇa.
§ In the above first example, if we like the taste we immediately start getting attached to it and
start generating saṅkhāra about that food. We start to generate vacī saṅkhāra (talking to
ourselves) about how good the food is. That is a different mental state that we make on our
own. Of course, we are likely to generate kāya saṅkhāra also when eat that food again. We
have discussed the three types of saṅkhāra in “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
§ A kamma viññāṇa arises within a fraction of a second after the vipāka viññāṇa, so that normally
we cannot differentiate between the two mental states. (For those who are familiar with
Abhidhamma, this is discussed at the end of this post).
§ Of course, vipāka vinanna lasts while we eat the food. A large number of jivhādvara citta vīthi
run while we eat. Kamma viññāṇa also arise later in the same citta vīthi , but they also arise
well after the meal. We can recall eating that food later at night (with a mano viññāṇa) and
generate more kamma viññāṇa (mainly via vacī saṅkhāra) by consciously thinking how good it
was.
§ In the second example above, a split second after we start experiencing the headache (vipāka
viññāṇa and the associated feeling of pain), we start getting depressed and generating vacī
saṅkhāra about how this going to ruin the day and mess up all our plans.
10. In both those examples, our first mental state (vipāka viññāṇa) was so strong that we — on our
own — generated a kamma viññāṇa which also gives rise to a kamma beeja.
§ That kamma beeja can come back to our mind later as a vipāka viññāṇa (this is a mano
viññāṇa). That is how we recalled our experience with the tasty food later at night.
§ If that headache was really bad, we may be able to recall it days or weeks later.
11. Thus an important point is that a kamma beeja is the same as a “dhammā” that makes contact with
the mind to give rise to a “mind sense event”; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ Just as a seeing event arises when the cakkhu indriya makes contact with a rūpa (“cakkhuñca
paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“), a “mind event” arises when a dhammā makes
contact with the mana indriya (“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“).
§ When that delicious food was eaten, one got really attached to it, and during the javana stages
of those citta vīthi generated many strong javana citta with high kammic potential that led to a
kamma beeja or a “dhammā” to be created.
§ Don’t be put off by those Pāli words. Once you get to know the meanings behind these words,
it will become easy to see what happens.
12. The strength of a given kamma beeja determines how likely would it be come back and make
contact with the mind later on. For example, if it was a regular sandwich, one would not make a
craving for that and thus would not create strong kamma beeja or a “dhammā“. Then it is likely that
one would have forgotten that meal in a few hours.
§ However, if the meal was really tasty, one would be thinking about it many days after leaving
the restaurant and each time one generates javana citta one will be making that kamma beeja or
a “dhammā” a little stronger. The more one thinks about it (i.e., generates vacī saṅkhāra) about
it, the more strong it gets.
13. In fact, this is how one becomes an alcoholic gradually. One starts remembering past “drinking
events” and generate a lot of mano and vacī saṅkhāra even when not drinking.
§ By the way, drinking is a kāya saṅkhāra, since it involves moving body parts.
§ Mano saṅkhāra arise automatically when one first think about a past drinking event (due to
“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“. Then when one starts consciously
thinking about that past event one starts generating vacī saṅkhāra; see, “How Are Gathi and
Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?“.
§ All three types of saṅkhāra contribute to “feed the viññāṇa for alcohol” via “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa” paṭicca samuppāda step. While we do not have control over mano saṅkhāra that arise
AUTOMATICALLY, we do have control over vacī and kāya saṅkhāra that are
CONSCIOUSLY generated, as discussed in the above post. That is the key to Ānāpāna and
Satipattāna bhāvanā.
14. Let us look at the timeline of how these two types of viññāṇa arise. viññāṇa is not an “entity” that
is always there. As with saññā, vedanā, and saṅkhāra, a given viññāṇa arises with a thought.
§ When thoughts are not there, the mind is in the bhavānga state. Sometimes we see people —
usually when they are not alert — staring out in to space. Unless they are in deep thought
(which is also possible), their minds are likely to be in the inactive bhavānga state.
§ Our minds are moved away from the dormant bhavānga state to conscious thoughts first via a
vipāka viññāṇa. Then if get attached (taṇhā) to that, we start generating kamma vipāka, which
will bring future kamma vipāka.
§ It is important to recognize this time line. We start with a vipāka viññāṇa and then start
generating kamma viññāṇa. Of course, these kamma lead to more vipāka later, and the whole
process continues without end. That is how we go through the rebirth process.
§ In order to stop this, we need to be mindful and stop generating kamma viññāṇa. especially
those that lead to bad kamma vipāka. This is the key to Ānāpāna and Satipattāna bhāvanā.
§ That is a lot of information to grasp. One may need to re-read and also read relevant posts in
order to fully understand.
15. Finally, the time delay between vipāka viññāṇa and kamma viññāṇa is unimaginably small.
§ In pañcadvāra citta vīthi with 17 thought moments, the vipāka viññāṇa arise at the beginning of
the citta vīthi with the pancadvaravajjana citta. Kamma viññāṇa are generated in javana citta
that arise towards the end of the citta vīthi . Of course, many more pañcadvāra and manodvara
citta vīthi run if one gets attached to that object (ārammana).
§ When dhamma impinge on the mana indriya to start a manodvara vipāka event, a manodvara
citta vīthi with around 10 citta runs, with the initial vipāka viññāṇa arising at the mind door
adverting thought moment. Again, kamma viññāṇa is generated at javana citta at the end of the
citta vīthi .
§ Those who are into Abhidhamma can consult, “Citta vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs” for
details.
Next, “Kamma Viññāṇa – Link Between Mind and Matter“, …
4.9.3.2 Kamma Viññāṇa – Link Between Mind and Matter
1. In the previous post in this series, we discussed that there are two types of viññāṇa: vipāka viññāṇa
and kamma viññāṇa; see, “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
§ We don’t have control over vipāka viññāṇa, but we do have control over kamma viññāṇa (via
controlling our saṅkhāra) , and that is why it is possible to attain Nibbāna.
§ We cannot do anything about the vipāka viññāṇa. Even in an Arahant they arise as kamma
vipāka; he/she will also see, hear, etc like anyone else.
§ Vipāka viññāṇa can arise via any of the six sense doors, i.e., as cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā,
kāya, or mano viññāṇa. Based on those, WE initiate new kamma viññāṇa, as we discussed in
the above mentioned post. This process is analyzed in detail in, “How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda
Cycles Initiated?“.
3. In Paṭicca Samuppāda it is the kamma viññāṇa that comes into play in, “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa“, NOT the vipāka viññāṇa.
§ All saṅkhāra are generated in our minds. While mano saṅkhāra arise automatically, we
CONSCIOUSLY generate vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, leading to kamma viññāṇa; see, “Root of
All Suffering – Ten Immoral Actions“.
§ This is why saṅkhāra are food for the viññāṇa, specifically for the kamma viññāṇa.
3. Furthermore, the next step in Paṭicca Samuppāda is “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“. As you can
see, this is where the connection to rūpa is made; we will discuss in detail below.
The KEY POINT is that kamma viññāṇa is not totally mental: The mind — when attached to
something — will create an energy (i.e., a kamma beeja or a dhammā) that will be recorded in
the kamma bhava.
§ Then in the future, that dhammā can come back to the mana indriya and trigger a mind-sense
event via “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“. that we discussed in “What
are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ Then, in the latter part of that citta vīthi, more kamma viññāṇa are created; see, “How Are
Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“.
§ Thus it is a feedback process that gets strengthened with time.
4. That kamma viññāṇa can be building up a kamma beeja (or a dhammā) in the kamma bhava over
time via the Paṭicca Samuppāda process: “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa”, “nāmarūpa paccayā
saḷāyatana”, “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa”, “phassa paccayā vedanā”, “vedanā paccayā taṇhā”,
“taṇhā paccayā upādāna”, and “upādāna paccayā bhava”.
§ Then under suitable conditions (see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“), that kamma beeja
(or a dhammā) can come back — as a vipāka — and start that process all over again; see,
“How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“.
§ A dhammā with energy or a kamma beeja created previously can come back to the mind as a
vipāka viññāṇa via “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“.
§ Every time one generates vacī or kaya saṅkhāra relevant to that viññāṇa, that makes viññāṇa
stronger.
5. As viññāṇa gets stronger, “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” makes nāmarūpa stronger. This
nāmarūpa is the first stage of a rūpa that is created by the mind, with the viññāṇa acting as the
intermediary.
§ It is also important to remember that dhammā includes not only kamma beeja, but also any
record of anything that has been done by a given person. So, we can also recall events that have
nothing to do with kammic energy, for example, remembering talking to someone or seeing
something or solving a math problem; see, “Difference Between Dhammā and Saṅkhāra“.
6. For example, an alcoholic has a “viññāṇa for drinking”. He (she) constantly thinks about drinking,
and will build up a “drunk existence (bhava)”, which comes back to his mind as a dhammā to trigger
more thoughts about drinking.
§ Until he breaks that loop by willfully controlling his thoughts and actions involving drinking,
that viññāṇa will grow with time.
§ The only way to break that habit of drinking is to be mindful about the bad consequences of
drinking and to forcefully suppress any thoughts about drinking (vacī saṅkhāra) and abstain
from drinking (kāya saṅkhāra).
7. What we discussed above is quite important. Kamma viññāṇa is the link between mind and
matter; it is an energy made by the mind; it creates tiny amounts of matter (rūpa) below the
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage. It is important to fully understand this point for one to fully
grasp the meaning of “mano pubbangama dhammā…”. This is in fact how the mind (mano) is
creating dhammā via viññāṇa.
§ This is confirmed in the WebLink: suttacentral: Majjhe Sutta (AN 6.61), where it is stated that
nama is at one end, rūpa is at the other end, with viññāṇa in the middle: “nāmaṃ kho,
āvuso, eko anto, rūpaṃ dutiyo anto, viññāṇaṃ majjhe“. [ Name (nāma), friends, is one end;
“
form (rūpa) is the second end; consciousness (viññāṇa) is in the middle; and craving is the
seamstress. For craving sews one to the production of this or that state of existence. It is in this
way that a bhikkhu directly knows what should be directly known; fully understands what
should be fully understood; and by doing so, in this very life he makes an end of suffering.]
§ It would be helpful if one had followed the preceding posts in the “Living Dhamma” section.
8. The goal of a given mind is to extract sense pleasures from the outside world, which is made of
rūpa both above and below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage; see, “Our Two Worlds: Material
and Immaterial“.
§ We all are familiar with sense enjoyment via the five physical senses. But the most enjoyment
we experience is through the sixth sense, the mind.
§ The five physical senses only bring in imprints of the five types of “solidified rūpa“: rūpa rūpa,
sadda rūpa, gandha rūpa, rasa rūpa, and pottabbha rūpa (in other words, sights, sounds,
smells, tastes, and body touches).
§ All those sense imprints that come in are enjoyed by the mind. In addition, the mind can also
enjoy thinking about such past sense experiences AND also any planned future events. The
“fine rūpa” involved here are “dhammā“; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!“.
9. How does the mind enjoy past sense experiences or future expected experiences? The answer to
this question leads us to the concept of dhammā, those rūpa that are below the suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka], and thus are really energies.
§ Just like we “bring in” external rūpa (or rūpa rūpa or varna rūpa ) with our eyes, external
sounds with our ears, etc, we bring in external dhammā through the mana indriya, as explained
in “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ Some of those dhammā are made by the mind via kamma viññāṇa! That kamma viññāṇa had
created a dhammā that got deposited in the kamma bhava as kamma beeja or dhammā with
energy. This is the connecting piece of the puzzle. We discuss this in different ways, in order to
grasp this key idea.
§ All dhammās, including nāma gotta and kamma viññāṇa (also called kamma beeja) are in the
nāma loka; see, “Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial“.
10. The point is that “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” starts the “rūpa generation process” the “viññāṇa
paccayā nāmarūpa” completes it.
§ In Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles leading to rebirth, this nāmarūpa is the blueprint for the new
existence via “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“, a new set of indriya are formed. In the case of a
human birth, this is the single cell (zygote); see, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say
about Birth Control?“.
§ In Paṭicca Samuppāda cycles operating during a lifetime, this nāmarūpa just gives rise to new
sense events via “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“, where existing indriya become āyatana for a
new sense event.
§ Note that our indriya (cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, etc) do not always act as āyatana. Only when we
act with lobha, dosa, moha that they act as āyatana to lead to new kamma.
11. In many posts at the site, we have discussed how our gathi lead to the creation of viññāṇa for
certain things we crave (and dislike); see, for example, “2. Viññāṇa (Consciousness) can be of Many
Different Types and Forms” and “3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious“.
§ We have also discussed how such viññāṇa arise due to our gathi, see, for example, “Gati to
Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and
Cravings (Asavas)“.
§ So, gathi and kamma viññāṇa are related to each other, feed on each other, and enhance each
other.
11. Vipāka viññāṇa are results of previous kamma, and cannot be stopped. What we need to stop is
kamma viññāṇa that AUTOMATICALLY arise due to our gathi; see, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda
for Vipāka Viññāṇa“.
§ Now we are essentially putting together the pieces of a puzzle to come up with the Buddha’s
world view to illustrate how the mind creates the world. Key pieces to the puzzle are in various
sections of the website. In the “Living Dhamma” section all those components are put together
starting from the basic components.
§ The picture will become more clear with the next post in the series, “Kamma Viññāṇa and
Nāmarūpa Paricceda Ñāṇa”.
4.9.3.3 Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It Really Means
January 6, 2018
1. I have seen several discussion forums discuss the verse, “viññāṇāṁ anidassanaṁ anantaṁ sabbato
pabhaṁ.”. Many times I have seen it be referred to as “there is controversy as to the precise meaning
of this enigmatic phrase.”
§ Most common translations say something like, “‘Consciousness non-manifest (sometimes as
consciousness without surface), infinite, radiant all around.”
§ Such incorrect translations have then led to another drastic error by saying that “anidassana
viññāṇa” is the same as the “pabhassara citta” and even as bhavaṅga. All these are
astonishingly wrong!
2. Viññāṇa is a central and critical concept to understand. I have started an in-depth discussion of
viññāṇa in an advanced subsection of the “Living Dhamma” section: “Viññāṇa Aggregate.”
§ In this post, I describe a meaningful translation to the verse, “viññāṇāṁ anidassanaṁ anantaṁ
sabbato pabhaṁ.” that is consistent with all the suttas in the Tipiṭaka. I would welcome any
evidence to the contrary.
§ Now we are getting into deep concepts. I would urge reading other related posts mentioned
above first. Depending on one’s background, it may take time to grasp these concepts.
§ One needs to read the posts in the subsection “Nāma & Rūpa to Nāmarūpa” of which “Viññāṇa
Aggregate” is a part. If one does not understand those concepts, one could keep going back to
earlier sections in the “Living Dhamma” section. It is designed to go from simple to profound.
3. First, let us find the meaning of “anidassana” from the Tipiṭaka. The meaning of the word
nidassana means an ‘illustration’ that is visible. Anidassana implies something that is not visible.
§ For example, dhammā impinge on the mana indriya and gives rise to mano viññāṇa via
“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ.” Those dhammā also cannot be seen;
dhammā are just energies lying below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage.
§ These dhamma are, “anidassanan appatighan dhammāyatana pariyāpanna rūpan“ or “cannot
be seen, cannot be touched, and can make contact only with the dhammāyatana”; see, “What
are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!.”
4. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Kakacūpama Sutta (MN 21): .”.Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, puriso
āgaccheyya lākhaṃ vā haliddiṃ vā nīlaṃ vā mañjiṭṭhaṃ vā ādāya. So evaṃ vadeyya: ‘ahaṃ
imasmiṃ ākāse rūpaṃ likhissāmi, rūpapātubhāvaṃ karissāmī’ti. Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, api
nu so puriso imasmiṃ ākāse rūpaṃ likheyya, rūpapātubhāvaṃ kareyyā”ti? “No hetaṃ, Bhante”.
“Taṃ kissa hetu”? “Ayañhi, Bhante, ākāso arūpī anidassano. .”
Translated: .”.Bhikkhus, a man may come along bringing off white or yellow or dark green or
crimson colors, and may say: ‘I will draw shapes in the sky, I will make material shapes appear. What
do you think about this, monks? Could that man draw pictures in the sky with those colors?” “No,
Bhante. It is not possible to draw shapes in the empty sky that are visible, that can manifest as
figures”.
5. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Nibbāna-The Mind Stilled” series, Venerable Kaṭukurunde
Ñāṇananda has provided more evidence that “anidassana” means “something that is not visible” or
‘something that does not manifest”; see, Sermons 7 and 8 in Volume II, which is provided as a pdf in
the above link. [WebLink: PDF File: seeingthroughthenet.net: Books by Venerable Kaṭukurunde
Ñāṇananda]
§ However, his explanation of viññāṇa is critically wrong, as I explain below. That is a common
mistake that I see in many current interpretations.
6. Even in Theravāda textbooks, Viññāṇa is loosely translated as “consciousness” or “awareness.”
But it is much more than that. Viññāṇa represents much more: “our hopes and desires that we
want from this world.” This is the critical point — that makes the connection between mind and
matter (rūpa).
§ We believe that things in this world will provide us with long-lasting happiness. Thus we do
vacī and kaya saṅkhāra to achieve them. Then, “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” leads to the
cultivation of a corresponding viññāṇa.
§ Viññāṇa means without ñāṇa. When one follows the Noble Path, one will comprehend the
Three Characteristics of nature (anicca, dukkha, anatta). Then one realize the unfruitfulness of
having such false hopes, i.e., cultivate paññā.
7. That is quite clear from Paṭicca Samuppada: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra; saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa; viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa, nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana, saḷāyatana paccayā phasso,
phassa paccayā vedanā, vedanā paccayā taṇhā, taṇhā paccayā upādāna, upādāna paccayā bhavo,
bhava paccayā jāti, jāti paccayā jarā, marana, soka-parideva-dukkha-domanassupāyasā
sambhavan’ti”.
§ All future suffering arises because we act with avijjā (i.e., generate abhisaṅkhāra) to achieve
pleasurable worldly things and thereby create viññāṇa.
8. Each individual citta of a human — which exists only for a billionth of a second — is
contaminated in 9 stages. Then it is added to the viññāṇakkhandha! See; “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant
Mind, and Bhavaṅga“
9. It is stated in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Saṅgīti Sutta (Digha Nikāya 33)“: “Tividhena
rūpasaṅgaho—sanidassanasappaṭighaṃ rūpam, anidassanasappaṭighaṃ rūpaṃ,
anidassanaappaṭighaṃ rūpaṃ.”
Translated: “Threefold classification of rūpa (matter) – visible and graspable, invisible and
graspable,
invisible and ungraspable .”
§ Three types of rūpa are sensed with the six sense faculties -five physical senses and the mana
indriya.
§ Those rūpā detected with the mana indriya are dhamma: “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca
uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!.”
§ These are the rūpa of the third kind: invisible and ungraspable (anidassan aappaṭighaṃ):
“anidassan appatighan dhammāyatana pariyāpanna rūpan“; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhammā
are rūpa too!.”
§ Those rūpā of the third kind are same as nāmarūpa that arise due to viññāṇa: “Kamma
Viññāṇa and Nāmarūpa Paricceda Ñana.”
§ That is explained systematically in the subsection: “Nāma & Rūpa to Nāmarūpa.”
10. Viññāṇa is also the link between mind and matter, even though it is in the “nāma” or mind
category” most of the time.
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga, nāma is defined as only the first
three khandha: “Tattha katamaṃ nāmaṃ? Vedanākkhandho, saññākkhandho,
saṅkhārakkhandho—idaṃ vuccati “nāmaṃ”. This is a clear indication that viññāṇa khandha
does not really belong in the “nāma or mind category”.
§ Even though vipāka viññāṇa is conclusively in the “nāma” category, kamma viññāṇa have
energies, and thus fall into the rūpa category. Sometimes viññāṇa is not included in the “nāma”
category for this reason.
§ That was pointed out in the post, “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means.” You may want to read
that first. As pointed out in that post, kamma viññāṇa are different from vipāka viññāṇa in that
kamma viññāṇa have energies embedded in them.
§ Solid confirmation is in the WebLink: suttacentral: Majje Sutta (AN 6.61), where the Buddha
stated that nāma is at one end, rūpa is at the other end, with viññāṇa in the middle:
“nāmaṃ kho, āvuso, eko anto, rūpaṃ dutiyo anto, viññāṇaṃ majjhe.”
11. The real nature of viññāṇa as cause for suffering is clearly stated in the “WebLink: suttacentral:
Dvayatānupassanāsutta (Sutta Nipata 3.12)“:
“Yaṃ kiñci dukkhaṃ sambhoti,
Sabbaṃ viññāṇapaccayā;
Viññāṇassa nirodhena,
Natthi dukkhassa sambhavo.”
Translated: “Whatever suffering that arises, all that arises due to viññāṇa; With the not arising of
viññāṇa, there is no existence with suffering.”
§ That should lay to rest any arguments about viññāṇa being the same as Nibbāna, pabhassara
citta, or bhavaṅga.
§ A critical point that I have been trying to make is that when one sees such dramatic
contradiction somewhere, one should be skeptical about the trustworthiness of that source. That
is the only way to make progress.
12. The phrase “viññāṇāṁ anidassanaṁ anantaṁ sabbato pabhaṁ.” appears in the WebLink:
suttacentral: Brahmanimantanika Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 49). I will first provide the essential parts
of the Sutta that are relevant to discuss the meaning of this verse.
Here is the essence of the Sutta in plain English:
At one time, The Buddha saw that the following wrong view came to the mind of the Baka Brahmā
(who is the leader of the Maha Brahma realm; see, “31 Realms of Existence“): “My existence is
permanent, it is stable, it is eternal, and is not liable to passing away”.
In order to correct the wrong view of the Maha Brahma, vanishing from near the great sāl-tree in the
Subhaga Grove at Ukkaṭṭhā, the Buddha appeared in that Brahma-world.
Baka Brahmā saw the Buddha coming, welcomed him, and told him: “Idañhi, mārisa, niccaṃ, idaṃ
dhuvaṃ, idaṃ sassataṃ, idaṃ kevalaṃ, idaṃ acavanadhammaṃ, idañhi na jāyati na jīyati na mīyati
na cavati na upapajjati. Ito ca panaññaṃ uttari nissaraṇaṃ natthī’ti.”
Translated: “This existence, good sir, can be maintained to my liking, it is stable, it is eternal. It
encompasses all, not liable to passing away. It is not born, nor does it age or die or to pass away or
uprise. There is not another further release from this existence.”
The Buddha replied: “You are ignorance. You say your existence can be to your liking, but that is not
so, it is not permanent as you say…” (yatra hi nāma aniccaṃyeva samānaṃ niccanti vakkhati,
addhuvaṃyeva samānaṃ dhuvanti vakkhati).
§ By the way, here it is important to note that the Pali word for “permanent” is “dhuva”, and not
“nicca”.
The Buddha added, “..although you say there is no further release that can be attained, there is indeed
a permanent release” (“santañca panaññaṃ uttari nissaraṇaṃ “natthaññaṃ uttari nissaraṇan”ti
vakkhatī’ti.”
§ Then there is an account of how Māra the deva, having entered a particular company of
Brahmas, spoke to encourage the Brahma. I will skip that account, in order to get to the crux of
the matter.
Baka Brahmā then replied to the Buddha: ‘But, good sir, I say “nicca” because it is so, I say “stable”
because it is stable, I say “eternal” because it is eternal. There is no more suffering,…I have escaped
from the cravings for patavi, apo, tejo, vayo dhatu.” (meaning he has overcome taṇhā for the sensual
pleasures available in the kāma loka comprised from the cattāro (four) maha dhatu).
The Buddha told the Baka Brahma that indeed he knew that the Baka Brahma had transcended the
kāma loka, and was fully aware of his powers. The Buddha added that there were things in this world
that the Brahma was not aware of: (1) There are higher Brahma realms, (2) Maha Brahma himself
was in the Abhassara Brahma realm, died there and was now reborn in this lower Brahma realm. The
Buddha told the Baka Brahma: “you neither know nor see those higher realms, but I know and see
them”.
Here is the really relevant part of the Sutta where the Buddha tells Maha Brahma: ”Pathaviṃ kho
ahaṃ, brahme, pathavito abhiññāya yāvatā pathaviyā pathavattena ananubhūtaṃ tadabhiññāya
pathaviṃ nāpahosiṃ, pathaviyā nāpahosiṃ, pathavito nāpahosiṃ, pathaviṃ meti nāpahosiṃ,
pathaviṃ nābhivadiṃ…”
Translated: Brahma, knowing patavi to be just patavi (devoid of life), knowing the true nature of
patavi, I do not take patavi to be me (No attachment to things in the kāma loka made out of the
cattāro (four) maha bhuta)”.
§ Then he repeated the same verse for the other three maha bhuta of which the bodies of beings
in kāma loka are made of apo, tejo, vayo.
Finally, he summarized it all in the following verse, which we discussed in the last post: “Viññāṇaṃ
anidassanaṃ anantaṃ sabbato pabhaṃ, taṃ pathaviyā pathavattenaananubhūtaṃ, āpassa āpattena
ananubhūtaṃ, tejassa tejattena ananubhūtaṃ, vāyassavāyattena ananubhūtaṃ, bhūtānaṃ bhūtattena
ananubhūtaṃ, devānaṃ devattenaananubhūtaṃ, pajāpatissa pajāpatittena ananubhūtaṃ,
brahmānaṃ brahmattenaananubhūtaṃ, ābhassarānaṃ ābhassarattena ananubhūtaṃ,
subhakiṇhānaṃ subhakiṇhānaṃ subhakiṇhattena ananubhūtaṃ, vehapphalānaṃ vehapphalattena
ananubhūtaṃ, abhibhussa abhibhuttena ananubhūtaṃ, sabbassa sabbattena ananubhūtaṃ.”.
Translated: “Viññāṇa is unseen, infinite, and leads to the rebirth process for all. With viññāṇa
(defiled consciousness), one cannot comprehend the real nature of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, bhūta,
deva, pajapti brahma, abhassara brahma, subhakinha brahma, vehapphala brahma, etc., i.e.,
everything in this world (sabba)”.
§ See, “Bhūta and Yathābhūta – What Do They Really Mean.”
Then, the Buddha concluded: “Thus Brahmā, I am not merely on an exact equality with you as
regards super-knowledge; I am indeed higher in knowledge”.
Then the Brahma challenged the Buddha, saying that he is going to disappear and If the Buddha is
indeed of higher knowledge, try to find him. But he was unable to hide from the Buddha.
Then the Buddha said, “‘Now I am vanishing from you, Brahmā. Find me if you can”. Of course, the
Brahma was unable to find the Buddha and thus had to concede defeat.
That is the essence of that long Sutta, that is relevant for this discussion.
13. We have to realize that indeed the Maha Brahmas has a very long lifetime of a quarter of the age
of our universe (several billion years).
§ Furthermore, since Brahmas do not have solid bodies like ours, they are not subject to diseases
or bodily pains. So, they live a peaceful life until the end of their bhava. So it is no surprise that
the Baka Brahma thought that he had overcome all suffering by getting rid of the human body.
See the post on “Body Types in 31 Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kāya” for details on
bodies of beings in other realms.
§ Of course, Brahmas can still have future births in the apāyas. Unless they had attained at least
the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, they have only suppressed kāma rāga, and have not removed
any of the ten samyojana.
§ That should give us a lot to think about our suffering-causing body that lasts only about 100
years! There is absolutely nothing to be proud of one’s physical body or to think that it is
worthwhile to take this foul body to be “mine”. That is one way to get rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi.
§ The question is not whether there is a “self” or not. It is wise to think that it is worthwhile
to have the perception of a “self”? The wrong perception of a “self” only leads to immoral
actions and thus suffering in future lives.
14. I hope this post — together with the other posts in this subsection — makes it clear what viññāṇa
is, and what is meant by the famous verse, “viññāṇāṁ anidassanaṁ anantaṁ sabbato pabhaṁ.”
§ Please make any comments/suggestions/criticisms in the discussion forum, so that everyone can
benefit from the discussion.
4.9.4 Sakkāya Diṭṭhi
You may want to read the post, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” first to have
the proper background.
1. Let us take a step back and systematically see what happens when we “see” a tree for example.
Please don’t just read through, but stop and think about each point. There is a lot of information
condensed in this post (true for most posts, but especially this one).
§ Light reflected off of the tree falls on our eyes and an image of the tree is formed in the back of
the eye. That is a really small image that falls on the retina, but we “see” its numerous leaves,
individual flowers, fruits in great detail. How is that possible?
§ Anyway, that image is transmitted to the brain in terms of a chemical signal. How does the
brain “see” the tree?
§ Someone who has thought a lot about this issue is Jeff Hawkins, who is actively engaged in
artificial intelligence. In his book, “On Intelligence”, he discusses current scientific knowledge
on vision and other sense inputs.
2. Starting on p. 55 of his book, Hawkins discusses how the image that falls on the back of the eye is
transmitted to the brain: “Visual information from the outside world is sent to your brain via a million
fibers in your optic nerve...”,
§ “You can visualize these inputs as a bundle of electrical wires or a bundle of optical fibers...”
and “The inputs to the brain are like those fibers, but they are called axons, and they carry
neural signals called ‘action potentials’ or ‘spikes’, which are partly chemical and partly
electrical...”.
§ As discussed there, not only visual signals but all sense inputs (sounds, taste, smell, and body
touch) to the brain are of the same type. You hear sound, see light, and feel pressure, but inside
your brain there isn’t any fundamental difference between these different types of neural
. An action potential is an action potential.
signals
§ Scientists have not been able to figure out how the brain distinguishes those different types of
signals. Moreover, they have no idea how the mind “sees light” or an image of that tree.
3. To quote more from that book: There is no light inside your head. It is dark in there. There is no
sound entering your brain either; it is quiet inside. In fact, the brain is the only part of your body that
has no senses itself. A surgeon could stick a finger into your brain and you would not feel it. All the
information that enters your mind comes in as spatial and temporal patterns on the axons.
§ So, it is a mystery how those chemical and electrical signals coming to the brain are
sensed as vision, sound, taste, smell, and body touch by the mind.
§ Scientists are trying to solve this puzzle by looking for answers in the brain. They have come to
the end of the line here.
§ Now let us see how the Buddha described these processes.
4. Actual “seeing” (and hearing, smelling, etc) goes on at the hadaya vatthu located in the
gandhabbā or the mental body. The gandhabbā is like a very fine mesh overlapping the physical
body, with the hadaya vatthu located close to the physical heart. That is what gives life to the
physical body.
§ At the death of the physical body that fine gandhabbā is pulled off the physical body like a
ghost. It is so fine that we cannot see it. But we all know that a body can be alive one second
and then become totally inert (like a piece of wood) at death.
§ Of course, when the gandhabbā comes out temporarily (as in the case of those who can do
astral travel or in the case of out-of-body experiences), it is still “attached” to the physical
body and keeps the physical body alive. In “astral travel” terminology, it is said that the mental
body is attached to the physical body via an invisible “silver cord”.
§ Such cases are discussed in, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“.
5. Another key point is that in the fine body of the gandhabbā, there are five “pasāda rūpa” located
around the hadaya vatthu: cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, and kāya, that correspond to seeing, hearing,
smelling, tasting, and touch. Here is the “missing part” of the puzzle that the scientists will never
be able to solve just by dealing with the brain:
§ The brain is like a very sophisticated computer that analyzes those chemical and electrical
signal discussed above in #2 and #3.
§ Those chemical and electrical signals (which come in packets of about 10 millisecond
duration per scientists) are converted to electromagnetic (EM) waves and are transmitted
through air to the pasāda rūpa located around the hadaya vatthu.
§ This is what the Buddha taught 2000 years ago and until scientists make this connection, they
will not be able to proceed too far from where they are now.
6. Of course, the Buddha did not explain it in terms of EM waves. These waves are called “kirana” in
Pāli or Sinhala.
§ This is explained in the post, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises” and
other posts in the following subsection: “Citta and Cetasika“.
§ It will take a real effort to understand the details, but it will be worthwhile the effort for those
who are serious about learning Abhidhamma. Otherwise, just try to get the basic idea.
7. As an example, let us take the case of seeing a tree. A continuous series of “data
packets” (chemical and electrical signals per #3, #4 above) that come to the brain from the eyes are
processed by the brain and are converted to EM waves (kirana).
§ Those waves then travel to the cakkhu pasāda that is located close to the hadaya vatthu. These
waves from the brain to the heart area of the body travel in air much faster than those
chemical/electrical signals traveling from the eyes to the brain via axons.
8. When such an EM wave (kirana) packet arrives at the cakkhu pasāda, it hits the hadaya vatthu and
“transfers” that visual information about the tree to the mind. The mind is actually born
momentarily during this transition for the duration of that signal.
§ This is what is meant by, “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“. Here cakkhu
is the cakkhu pasāda rūpa (not the physical eye) and rūpa (in “rupeca“) is the signal from the
brain that carries the visual signal about the tree (not the actual tree!). [uppajjati : [u + pad
+ ya] to be born; arises.]
9. This is CRITICALLY important to realize. What meant by a “rūpa” is NOT the same as what our
visual object is. We DO NOT see a man, woman, or a tree. What comes to the mind is a “rūpa signal”
that is generated by the brain. That signal has all the INFORMATION about that visual object.
§ The reception of the visual signal (rūpa) by the cakkhu pasāda (cakkhu) happens at the very
moment that the cakkhu pasāda transfers that signal to the hadaya vatthu by “hitting it”. And
at that very moment, cakkhu viññāṇa arises: “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ“.
10. These are critical points to understand, even if all the details are not understood. The visual
consciousness arises for a brief moment when that information about the visual object is transferred
to the mind.
§ However, within that split second, not only the object (the tree in this case) is recognized, but
also vedanā, saññā (recognition), and other mental factors also arise.
§ For example, if we have seen that tree in the past, the mansikāra cetasika is able to feed that
information too, so we will know the name of the tree instantly; see, “Amazingly Fast Time
Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
11. In another example, let us think about what happens when we tap a glass with a spoon. Of course,
we will hear the tapping sound.
§ Now, where did that sound come from” Was it in the glass? No. Was the sound in the spoon?
No.
§ The sound was emitted as a result of the spoon hitting the glass. If the spoon did not hit a glass,
there would not be a tapping sound.
§ In the same way, unless a “rūpa” or an image taken in by the eyes came to cakkhu pasāda and
made it hit the hadaya vatthu, there would not be a “seeing event” or a cakkhu viññāṇa.
12. So, there is no “entity” called the mind. The mind arises when we receive sense inputs via the
five physical senses as described above.
§ What we loosely call the “mind” is actually the viññāṇakkhandha that arises in a billionth of a
second, after going through a fast process of citta, mano, manasan, ..: “Amazingly Fast Time
Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
§ We can not only hear the tapping sound, but we can also see the glass and the spoon at the same
time too. But those two events do not really happen “at exactly the same time”.
§ What comes to the mind is a series of sense inputs (via all five physical senses) in rapid
succession. We just perceive it all to happen at the same time.
13. How this is possible is explained in the post, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness)
Arises” and other posts in the following sub section: “Citta and Cetasika“.
§ As explained there, the process is similar to how a motion picture works. When making a
movie, what is actually done is to take many many static pictures and then play them back at
fast enough speed. If the playback speed is too slow, we can see individual pictures, but above a
certain “projection rate”, it looks like real motion. Here is a video that illustrates this well:
WebLink: youtube: Animation basics: The optical illusion of motion - TED-Ed
14. When we see the outside world, what happens is very similar to the above. At the end of the video
it is stated that the “movie” we see is an illusion, and as the Buddha explained, that holds for real
life as well. In real life when we see someone coming towards us, what we actually see is a series of
“static pictures” or citta projected at a very fast rate in our minds, giving us the illusion of a “movie
like experience”.
§ The mind is very fast. The Buddha said that there is nothing in this world that is faster than the
mind. So, this is why we feel that all types of sense inputs come to “one’s mind” at the same
time. In reality, they are discrete snapshots, just like movie frames!
§ But just like we see a continuous movie (that is really a large number of individual picture
frames), we feel like we have a continuous mind.
15. Now to the second issue on the mind. Why do each of us experience the outside world our own
way, and have our own feelings and perceptions about a given sense input (love or anger when seeing
the same person, for example)? That is why we feel like “I have my own mind“.
§ The key is to realize that our response to the external sense inputs is unique because we have
our “own way” of perceiving and the evaluating those sense inputs based on the set of gati that
we have.
16. As we discussed in the previous post, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“, our
feelings as well as our initial responses reflect our personality or our gati.
§ There we also discussed why the types of sense input also plays an important role. So, our
INITIAL response to an external sense input depends on BOTH; one’s gati AND the types of
sense input.
§ That was an important post, so it may be beneficial to go over it again. In this series of posts, I
am going to try to highlight some key features of Buddha Dhamma that will truly help to get rid
of sakkāya diṭṭhi. That is the key to the sotāpanna stage.
17. In other words, our “state of mind” depends on both our gati and the sense inputs that we are
subjected to. Furthermore, we don’t have “a fixed mind”; it can change very rapidly.
§ If you think back, I am sure you can remember times where you felt like your mind was filled
with greed; other times with love; yet another time with anger, …
§ As one progresses on the Path, these extreme swings of “one’s mind” will become less, and that
is the key to nirāmisa sukha which eventually leads to Nibbāna.
§ Each of us does not have a fixed mind. That means we don’t generate “our own” saññā,
vedanā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa. In other words, we do not have our own saññākkhandha,
vedanākkhandha, saṅkhārakkhandha, and viññāṇakkhandha.
§ Moreover, it is not fruitful to take any of them as “mine”. That perception is part of Sakkāya
diṭṭhi.
18. Sakkāya diṭṭhi can be stated as: “I am my body”, “I am my vedanā“, “I am my saññā“, “I am my
saṅkhāra“, and “I am my viññāna“. The last four can be lumped together to label as, “I am my mind”.
But a better way to remove Sakkāya diṭṭhi is to realize that: “All those entities are not worthwhile to
be taken as mine”.
§ We tend to think automatically that “I have my own body” and “I have my own mind”, and “it
is fruitful to be taken them as mine”.
§ Let us first analyze the mind and see whether that statement is true. In the next post, we will
address “I have my own body” and “it is fruitful to be taken as mine”.
§ In order to understand what the mind is, the Buddha analyzed how the mind arises step-by-
step, by breaking down the process. That is why he called himself a “Vibhajjavādi“; see,
“WebLink: suttacentral: Subha Sutta (MN 99)“: “Vibhajjavādo kho ahamettha, māṇava;
nāhamettha ekaṃsavādo..” or “Young man, I am a Vibhajjavādi (one who analyzes from many
aspects by dividing a given process to parts), I do not hold a fixed view based on just one
aspect”.
In the next post, we will discuss why it is not fruitful to take one’s body as “one’s own”. But it is
important to know that the perception of “me” goes away only at the Arahant stage; see, “Sakkāya
Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?“.
4.9.5 Nāmarūpa Formation
1. Nāmarūpa can have few different meanings depending on the context, i.e., where it is used. But the
most important meaning is associated with the “nāmarūpa paricceda ñāṇa“.
§ When one has the nāmarūpa paricceda ñāṇa, one understands how the mind is related to
matter, i.e., how viññāṇa acts as the critical link between mind and matter.
4. Kamma viññāṇa with kammic energy are created in javana citta. That kammic energy may start
small but can grow with repeated generation of abhisaṅkhāra and can grow to be a kamma beeja that
can give rise to a new bhava. That kamma beeja then gives rise to a very fine mental body
(gandhabba) which will provide the “seed” for the dense physical body.
§ This happens at “upādāna paccayā bhava” step giving rise to a gandhabba, which is a very
tiny rūpa which is really a “packet of energy”.
§ Then at the “bhava paccayā jāti” step, gandhabba enters a womb and starts a new physical
body.
§ Just like a tiny seed can grow to a huge tree by taking in water and nutrients from the soil, an
unimaginably small gandhabba gives rise to the heavy human body by taking in food. The only
difference is that while a gandhabba or a human has a mind, a seed or a tree does not.
5. Our solid physical body starts with a gandhabba — smaller than the first cell made by the reunion
of mother and father (zygote) — descending to a womb and taking hold of that zygote in the womb.
We recall that the Buddha also called this event as “a viññāṇa descending to the womb”; see,
“Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka“, and below. From the posts in this series, now we know
why the “gandhabba descending” can also be called “viññāṇa descending”.
§ The complex process of this single zygote growing into a adult human is discussed in, “What
does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
§ Therefore, the “seed” to bring up this physical body of several hundred pounds (tens of
kg), was the kammic energy created in the paṭisandhi viññāṇa which gave rise to a
gandhabba consisting of just a few suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka].
6. This basic mechanism of how a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] — the smallest unit of matter (billion
times smaller than an atom in modern science) — is created with the mind was discussed in the post,
“The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]” in the Abhidhamma section. But in this
subsection on nāmarūpa, we are discussing it with a more simple, fundamental analysis that everyone
can understand (if the fundamentals are grasped).
§ Furthermore, those with abhiññā powers can intensify the kammic power in javana citta in
jhānas (specifically in jhāna samāpatti), and create matter directly too. This enhancement can
be compared to the difference between a regular lamp that puts out a bit of light, and a laser
which puts of intense light that can cut through metal; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of
Mental Power“.
§ When we dive deeper into Buddha Dhamma we will be able to see that some phenomena that
seem “supernatural” (like creating a flower using mind energy) are indeed possible. But that
ability to create matter requires purifying the mind to very high levels.
7. The Buddha described how the paṭisandhi viññāṇa (which is the same as the gandhabba)
“descends” to the womb of the mother and starting the process in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Maha
Nidana Sutta (Digha Nikāya 15)” where he has the following exchange with Ven. Ānanda:
‘Viññāṇapaccayā nāmarūpan’ti iti kho panetaṃ vuttaṃ, tadānanda, imināpetaṃ pariyāyena
veditabbaṃ, yathā viññāṇapaccayā nāmarūpaṃ. Viññāṇañca hi, ānanda, mātukucchismiṃ na
okkamissatha, api nu kho nāmarūpaṃ mātukucchismiṃ samuccissathā”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante”.
“Viññāṇañca hi, ānanda, mātukucchismiṃ okkamitvā vokkamissatha, api nu kho nāmarūpaṃ
itthattāya abhinibbattissathā”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante”. “Viññāṇañca hi, ānanda, daharasseva sato
vocchijjissatha kumārakassa vā kumārikāya vā, api nu kho nāmarūpaṃ vuddhiṃ virūḷhiṃ vepullaṃ
āpajjissathā”ti? “No hetaṃ, bhante”. “Tasmātihānanda, eseva hetu etaṃ nidānaṃ esa samudayo esa
paccayo nāmarūpassa—yadidaṃ viññāṇaṃ.
Here is the English translation:
“It was said: ‘With consciousness as condition there is nāmarūpa (normally translated as mentality-
materiality; which in this case is the gandhabba).’
How that is so, Ānanda, should be understood in this way: If consciousness (Viññāṇañca) were not to
descend (na okkamissatha) into the mother’s womb, would that nāmarūpa take shape in the womb?”
“Certainly not, venerable sir.”
“If, after descending (okkamitvā) into the womb, consciousness were to depart (vokkamissatha),
would that nāmarūpa be generated into this present state of being?”
(Note: this happens in the case of a natural termination of pregnancy, where the gandhabba comes
out of the womb on its own, because it is not a suitable match).
“Certainly not, venerable sir.”
“If the consciousness of a young boy or girl (kumārakassa vā kumārikāya vā) were to be come out,
would that nāmarūpa grow up, develop, and reach maturity?”
“Certainly not, venerable sir.”
“Therefore, Ānanda, this is the cause, source, origin, and condition (eseva hetu etaṃ nidānaṃ esa
samudayo) for nāmarūpa, namely, defiled consciousness (yadidaṃ viññāṇaṃ).
8. Therefore, it is quite clear that it is the kammic energy of the paṭisandhi viññāṇa that “descends” to
the womb and gives rise to the physical body. gandhabba is another term for paṭisandhi viññāṇa
descending to the womb; it is also called “manomaya kāya“.
§ Sometimes the gandhabba in a human body can come out in a stressful situation; see,
“Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“. The Buddha compared a gandhabba
(sometimes also called a Tirokutta or a Tirokuddha) coming out of a physical body to a sword
being pulled out of the sheath that it is stored in.
9. The erroneous concept of a paṭisandhi taking place in a womb is nowhere to be found in the
Tipiṭaka. Note that in the above verse in #7, the term okkanti is used to describes the descent of the
paṭisandhi viññāṇa to the womb, and the word “paṭisandhi” is not there. Patisandhi took place in the
previous life, at the end of that bhava , see, “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“.
§ Furthermore, if paṭisandhi took place in the womb, then a human bhava would last only until
the death. Then, since human bhava is so rare (see, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of
Rebirth in the Human Realm“), all those rebirth stories cannot be accounted for (where children
recall their previous human lives only several years before).
§ The concept of a gandhabba is criticized by some saying that it is a Mahāyāna concept about an
“antarā bhava“. Of course there is no antarā bhava, i.e., there is no gap between two adjacent
“bhava“: cuti (end of one bhava) is followed by the grasping of the next bhava in the next
thought moment, see, “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“.
10. A human gandhabba may be born with a human body many times before the kammic energy for
the human bhava runs out and he/she is born in another existence (as a deva, animal, etc); see,
“Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ During that whole time, the human gandhabba lives moving from one body to another and
spending the time “in between successive human bodies” in para loka; see, “Hidden World of
the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
§ I keep repeating things, because these are important points. In case there are still questions, the
“Search” box on top right is a good resource to find relevant posts. The Pure Dhamma –
Sitemap is another good resource.
§ You can also use the “Comments” box to send a comment or ask a question. I will be opening
the discussion forum soon too.
11. This connection between mind and matter (nāma and rūpa) — combined via viññāṇa to create
nāmarūpa — is what the Buddha meant when said that, “mano pubbangamā dhammā“, i.e., “the
mind is the precursor to all dhamma“.
§ When one understands that point one is said to have the “nāmarūpa paricceda ñāṇa“.
§ We have essentially all the major components in place now, and there may be some who can
see the “whole picture” at least vaguely. But there are still more minor pieces that needs to be
added to make the picture much clearer.
§ However, if a key piece cannot be understood, the picture may not become clear. Please do not
hesitate to comment if you have questions. Even if it is clear to me, I may not be conveying it in
a optimum way, and I can make it better with your input.
12. I must emphasize that one could be a Sotāpanna and may not even know about these details; I do
not want to discourage those who are not really into Abhidhamma.
§ What is needed for the Sotāpanna stage is a grasp of Tilakkhaṇa, the anicca nature of this
world.
§ The details discussed in this subsection are to dispel any doubts about the consistency of
Buddha Dhamma, and to illustrate that it can explain mind phenomena to profoundly deep
levels. Furthermore, it can give confidence to those who have any remaining doubts about the
validity of key concepts in Buddha Dhamma (laws of kamma, rebirth, gandhabba, etc).
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
484 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
1. Whether it is a scientist or a Buddha, each is “discovering” the way nature works, i.e., reveal to the
world what the fundamental laws of nature are. To appreciate what a Buddha does in comparison to a
scientist, contemplate the following. The scientific knowledge we have today is the CUMULATIVE
effort of thousands of scientists, each one taking the knowledge-base a little further. As Newton said,
“I was fortunate to stand on the shoulders of giants to see further.”
§ Not all scientists make similar contributions. Galileo, Newton, and Einstein made “giant leaps”
in comparison to the smaller steps taken by other scientists.
§ Now with cumulative effort over many hundreds of years, science has made significant
advances concerning understanding some of the fundamental laws relevant to INERT
MATTER.
§ On the other hand, there is virtually no progress in understanding how the mind works; see,
“Cosciousness – A Dhamma Perspective.”
2. As I build up this site, anyone will be able to see that Buddha Dhamma is the ultimate Grand
Unified Theory. It explains the behavior of inert matter and living beings that we can see. And it also
describes the existence of an infinite number of worlds with living beings in 29 other realms (other
than the human and animal realms that we cannot see). See, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma.”
§ Buddha Dhamma is not a religion in the sense of providing salvation. The Buddha was not a
God, a prophet, or a messenger. He was a human being who purified his mind to perfection so
that he could see the whole of existence.
§ The Buddha was the greatest scientist who investigated the problem of existence and found a
complete solution. We all need to find our salvation by following the Path that he prescribed to
purify our minds.
3. Newton could not have discovered the laws of gravity if it were not for the efforts of scientists like
Brahe and Copernicus. Similarly, Einstein could not have discovered relativity without the
knowledge passed down by other scientists. Quantum mechanics would not have been possible
without the efforts of multiple scientists who moved forward with the evidence gathered by hundreds
of other scientists.
§ The Buddha, in comparison, discovered the complete set of laws about the WHOLE
EXISTENCE by his efforts. That includes not only the way inert matter behaves on this Earth
but all of existence in the 31 realms that science is not even aware of). That includes the way
inert matter behaves in all 31 realms AND the minds of beings in those 31 realms.
§ I recently proposed an explanation for the existing controversy over the “non-locality” issue in
quantum mechanics. Everything in this universe inter-connected (or entangled) at a deep level;
“Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma.”
4. We could say that the minds of the caliber of Newton and Einstein appear roughly every 100 years.
The mind of a Buddha is infinitely more advanced and appears once in many billions of years if
beings are lucky. Normally, the gaps are much more wider.
§ There have been four Buddhas in this Mahā kalpa, but the last Buddha before them was born
30 Mahā Kalpas ago. Thus, there was a gap of 30 Mahā Kalpas (roughly a trillion years)
without a Buddha appearing in this world.
§ The Buddhas use a method that is different from the “scientific method” used by scientists.
Instead of conducting experiments on inert matter, they conduct mind experiments. Answers to
ultimate questions on the existence of living beings who have complex minds can be found only
by PURIFYING a human mind to the ultimate level. That is what a Buddha does.
5. I will try to provide at least some details of the complex world view that was provided by the
Buddha on this website. Buddha Dhamma has been been muddled and distorted within the past 2500
years.
§ “Our world” is much more complicated than what is grasped by our senses; see, “The Grand
Unified Theory of Dhamma.”
§ And our lives do not end with this one; see, “Evidence for Rebirth.”
§ Those two facts constitute the basis of the true nature of existence. They need to be thought
about carefully. One cannot comprehend the message of the Buddha until one at least has some
idea about this “big picture.”
Now let us examine one case where it took 2500 years for science to come to be consistent with one
part of Buddha Dhamma’s world view.
It Took 2500 Years…
Here is a picture of our Milky Way galaxy. We can see only a couple of thousand stars. But there are
hundreds of BILLIONS of stars in our galaxy, and there are about an equal number of GALAXIES in
our universe. Thus for each star in our galaxy, there is a whole galaxy out there. It is truly mind-
boggling.
Milky Way
1. Even a few hundred years ago, even scientists believed our Earth was at the center of the universe:
WebLink: WIKI: Geocentric model
§ In any case, the Buddha, of course, did not say which of these theories is correct. He just said
life always existed, and it always will. But he did say that “star systems” — like our Solar
system — come into being, survive for long times, and destroyed at the end.
§ And that process repeats over and over!
8. January 24, 2019: Relevant post: “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27).”
2. Therefore, the question, “What is the origin of life?” is very much relevant to UNDERSTANDING
Buddha Dhamma.
§ Most scientists believe that our universe came tom existence only about 14 billion years ago
with the “Big Bang”.
§ Furthermore, current scientific theories say that life first formed in a primitive state (single-cell
entities) and evolved to more complex life forms. And that humans came into existence less
than five hundred thousand years ago.
§ Most scientists do not agree with the “Creation hypothesis” that is the foundation of Abrahamic
religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) simply because it is not compatible with the Principle of
Causality. It says nothing can come to existence without a cause(s). If a Creator created life,
how did that Creator come into existence?
§ Compatibility of a “Big Bang” origin with causality is also not clear. Scientists are exploring
possibilities like the “multiverse theory”, but those are still speculative.
§ However, our focus in this series of posts is not the actual origin of the universe, but the
origin of life on Earth.
Buddha’s Explanation
3. According to the Buddha, life has no traceable beginning. This is certainly compatible with
causality.
§ For example, in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Gaddulabaddha Sutta (SN 22.99)“:
“Anamataggoyaṃ, bhikkhave, saṃsāro” means “bhikkhus, there is no discernible beginning
to the rebirth process”. It also describes how living beings are bound to saṃsāra, because
they do not realize the anicca, dukkha, anatta nature, which we recently discussed: “Sotāpanna
Stage and Tilakkhaṇa“.
§ The above verse appears in all suttas in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Anamatagga Saṃyutta” of
the Saṃyutta Nikāya, where each sutta gives a simile to illustrate how long each of us has been
in this rebirth process and how much suffering we have endured.
§ However, it must be noted that Buddha’s message is NOT a depressing one.
§ Whether there is a Buddha in the world or not, this suffering exists. This suffering is real but
there is a way to overcome that suffering.
§ Without a Buddha we will not even be aware of this hidden suffering. Furthermore, a Buddha
FOUND A WAY (Noble Eightfold Path) to stop this perpetual suffering. That is the
uplifting message.
4. As many of you may have observed, learning deeper aspects of Buddha Dhamma is not easy. It
requires one to spend a considerable time learning and then contemplating.
§ Without an understanding of how long the sansāric journey is and how much suffering is
encountered in most births, it is difficult to generate the MOTIVATION to study Buddha
Dhamma. Most people turn to Buddha Dhamma only when they come down with a harsh
suffering, seeking relief. But the best time to learn is when one is healthy with a sharp mind,
and I hope I can motivate those people too with this series.
§ In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Upanisa Sutta (SN 12.23)“, the Buddha discussed the proximate
causes/conditions (upanisa) for various factors leading to Nibbāna. Understanding how various
births (jāti) arise and how ALL those births give rise to dukkha (suffering) is the key.
§ That understanding cannot be attained until one can clearly see that there has not been a
BEGINNING to this rebirth process, and we all have suffered so much in each and every birth.
Regarding the perpetual suffering, I will also discuss the “WebLink: suttacentral: Pathama
Niraya Sagga Sutta (AN 10.211)” in the future. It explains the causes for rebirth in good and
bad realms, and why most births are in bad realms.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
492 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
5. Life has always existed, but planetary systems (like our Solar system) are destroyed periodically
and re-formed over long times.
§ This is the only explanation that is consistent with the Principle of Causality: There is no “first
beginning to life”. Life always existed, and it evolves according to the Principle of Causality,
which is Paṭicca Samuppāda; see my previous post: “Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda (How We
Create Our Own Rebirths)“.
§ If we go by the Principle of Causality (which is THE basis of modern science), there CANNOT
be an origin of life, unless life can start with inert matter.
§ What the video below explains is that it is NOT POSSIBLE to create EVEN A SINGLE
CELL (basic building block of life) in the laboratory starting with inter matter. If it cannot
be created in a laboratory under controlled conditions, it WILL NOT be possible for life to arise
in a natural process starting with inert matter.
Evolutionists Versus Creationists
6. Of course, there is an ongoing debate between the evolutionists and creationists. Evolutionists
believe that life evolved into complex entities like humans over billions of years. Furthermore, they
believe that even the first cell (which is the building block of all life forms) evolved in the early Earth
starting with inert molecules. Creationists, on the other hand, believe that a Creator God created life.
§ I am providing a few references at the end of the post for both sides.
§ It is to be noted that most evolutionists do not discuss the origin of a cell that much. They
mainly focus on “evolution of the species” STARTING WITH a fully functioning cell and
progressing into more complex species with more and more cells of complex structure.
Evolutionists are just speculating that a cell evolved in the primitive Earth due to random
events. For example, Dr. Richard Dawkins writes in the reference given below, “How long
would we have to wait before random chemical events on a planet, random thermal jostling of
atoms and molecules, resulted in a self-replicating molecule? Chemists don’t know the answer
to this question” (p. 144).
§ On the other hand, creationists focus on the issue of why it is not possible to “create a cell” via
evolution. Many of them agree that complex life possibly evolved starting with simpler life
forms.
§ I agree with the creationists that it is not possible for a cell to come to existence “starting with
inert molecules” via random events. You can decide for yourself based on the videos below
(and the references if you are really interested). Of course, we can discuss at the discussion
forum.
7. The video below is by a scientist (Dr. James Tour) who has a different viewpoint than most other
scientists. He provides solid evidence that life could not have evolved starting with inert matter. It is
too complex to have been evolved by natural processes.
§ At the end of the video, Dr. Tour comes to the conclusion that since life is too complex to
evolve, it must have been CREATED by a Creator God. That is the other extreme view.
§ According to Buddha Dhamma, life did not evolve from inert matter, nor it was created by a
Creator God. Life always existed and it just takes different forms when a given “lifestream” is
reborn a human, animal, deva, etc. We all have been born in most of the 31 realms in our deep
past! When the conditions on Earth became suitable cells came to existence via kammic energy.
Mind Is the Creator of (New Forms of) Life! No Beginning to Life
8. Of course, it is very likely that Dr. Tour is not aware of the extensive and scientific explanation by
the Buddha in the Aggañña sutta: Life has ALWAYS existed. A given lifestream (you or I) have
existed without a traceable beginning.
§ I will not be able to discuss that complex process any time soon. But I have discussed the main
points in the Aggañña sutta in the post:”Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
§ It is just that we ourselves CREATE OUR OWN future lives, as described via Uppatti Paṭicca
Samuppāda (which I discussed in my previous post).
9. A cell is the building block of life. Setting aside a complex life form like a human (made of
trillions of different types of cells), science WILL NOT be able to create even a single cell. In fact,
even in any living being, individual cells are not formed. Instead, an existing cell divides to make two
cells, and that is how more and more living cells come into existence!
§ Each of our bodies started with just a single cell (zygote), and it became alive only when a
gandhabba (or patisandhi vinnana) “descended to the womb” and merged with that single
. It is cell division that led to the current physical body with trillions of cells; see, “Buddhist
cell
Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception“.
§ No scientist has been able to CREATE even a primitive single cell. In cloning experiments,
they deal only with existing cells; see, “Cloning and Gandhabba“.
§ As explained by Dr. Tour, a living cell is very complex and is like a working factory. He does a
good job in his explanations.
WebLink: youtube: James Tour: The Mystery of the Origin of Life
Richard Dawkins, “The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe
without Design” (2015).
Jerry A. Coyne, “Why Evolution is True” (2010).
(Note that both these and other books/research papers do not provide ANY evidence for the evolution
of a cell)
For creation:
Stephen Meyer, “Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design” (2010).
Richard Behe, “Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution” (2006).
Both evolution and creation not adequate:
Thomas Nagel, “Mind & Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is
Almost Certainly False” (2012).
§ Professor Nagel (who is a philosopher) obviously has had no exposure to Buddha Dhamma. But
I am very much impressed that he came to the conclusion that mind MUST play a central role. I
will write more on that in future posts.
5.2.2 Human Life – A Mental Base (Gandhabba) and a Material Base (Cell)
1. Of course, science assumes that life is only associated with a physical body and when the physical
body dies, that is the end of the story. This is what we called “uccheda diṭṭhi” in the post, “Sakkāya
Diṭṭhi – Getting Rid of Deeper Wrong Views“. Here is a summary of current scientific understanding
of the beginning of a human life.
§ During mother’s menstrual cycle, one egg (ovum) is usually released from one of the ovaries
and is swept into the funnel-shaped end of one of the fallopian tubes.
§ After intercourse with the father, If a sperm penetrates the egg there, fertilization results and
the fertilized egg (zygote) moves down the fallopian tube and ends up in the uterus. This
zygote divides into two cells, those two to four cells, etc.
§ This collection of cells enters the uterus in 3 to 5 days. In the uterus, the cells continue to
divide, becoming a ball of cells called a blastocyst. Inside the uterus, the blastocyst implants in
the wall of the uterus, where it develops into an embryo attached to a placenta and surrounded
by fluid-filled membranes; see, WebLink: merckmanuals.com: Stages of Development of the
Fetus
2. This cell division is what causes that baby to grow (first inside the womb and then outside the
womb) to become a full-grown human with trillions of cells. It is that first cell (which cannot even
be seen with the naked eye) that eventually multiplied to a mass of trillion of cells in a grown
human!
§ However, there is much confusion about WHEN that zygote becomes alive, i.e., when it can be
called “a human”. This “time of conception” varies widely based on personal and religious
beliefs.
§ Some people believe life starts at the moment of the merger of the egg and sperm (to form the
zygote). At the other end, some say actual birth of the baby (i.e., coming out of the womb) is
the start of the human life! Some others define the life to start when the embryo’s heart starts
beating.
§ This confusion goes away when one understands the complete process described by the
Buddha.
Buddhist Description of a Human Life – Bhava and Jāti
One needs to understand the concepts of bhava, okkanti, and jāti in order to understand how a human
being is conceived in the womb (conception) and is born 9 months later.
3. According to the suttas as well as Abhidhamma in the Tipiṭaka, a new human existence (bhava)
does not start in a womb. It starts at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment when the previous bhava comes to
an end. For example, if a deva dies and becomes a human, a human gandhabba (fine mental body)
will be formed at the time of death of that deva; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“.
§ A human bhava can last thousands of years. On the other hand, a physical human body lasts
only about 100 years. In between successive births with “human bodies”, the gandhabba
(mental body) lives in what is called “para loka“. The para loka co-exists with our human loka,
but we cannot see those fine mental bodies of gandhabbas; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba,
and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ It must be noted that all living being beings have a mental body and it is called “manomaya
kāya”. Gandhabba is a special case of a manomaya kāya; see #12 below.
§ That human gandhabba will have to wait until suitable womb becomes available. By “suitable”
it means that the gati (loosely related to character/habits) of the gandhabba have to match those
of the parents, especially the mother. Gati is an important concept in Buddha Dhamma that has
been ignored for a long time; do a search for “gati” on the top right search box to find about
“gati“. A starting post is, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings
(Āsavas)“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Dhamma and Science 495
§ Anytime after the egg and sperm are merged to form the zygote, a “matching gandhabba” can
descend to the womb. Now a new human life starts with a mental body and the seed for a
physical body (zygote).
4. Therefore, the time of conception is very precise in Buddha Dhamma: It happens at the time when
the life-less zygote becomes “alive” with the merging of the gandhabba. That is the time of
conception and it happens very early, normally within a day after intercourse.
§ In suttas, this is called “okkanthi” (a gandhabba or a paṭisandhi viññāṇa descending to a
womb); see, “Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka“. When the baby is born that is jāti.
§ The moral issues involving contraception and abortions are discussed in the post, “Buddhist
Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception“.
5. What happens in a womb (when an egg is fertilized with a sperm) is just to provide the “material
basis” (zygote or the “first cell”) for the gandhabba to start a new “human being” that will eventually
grow to become an adult with trillions of cells.
§ The “blueprint” for that physical body (i.e., the gandhabba) was created at the dying moment in
the previous life. The gandhabba brings his/her own gati as well as set of kamma vipāka that
would come into play during the existence of that human body.
§ However, the physical body will also take into account the features of the mother and father via
that zygote; see, #1 above.
§ Therefore, the new baby will have complex mixture of physical and mental characteristics of all
three.
§ All this is discussed in more detail in several posts, including “Ghost in the Machine –
Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body”,
and a more technical description in “Cuti-Paṭisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“.
Connection to Sakkāya Diṭṭhi
6. I will take this opportunity to point out that is it only series of events that lead to a “new human
being”. That gandhabba which led to a new life arose due to a “paṭisandhi viññāṇa“, which is
nothing other than a “packet of kammic energy” created in a previous life. Therefore, it was
NOT an existing “living being” that “became the new human being”.
§This is why the Buddha said there is no “self” traveling from life-to-life. Any living being just
CREATES energy (kammic energy in terms of a paṭisandhi viññāṇa) to start a new “life form”.
§ However, there is “continuity of life” that was CAUSED in a previous life (when a strong
kamma was done and this paṭisandhi viññāṇa was created). Therefore, it is also not correct to
say that a new life arises without a previous life making causes for it. There is a causal
connection between adjacent lives.
§ If one can grasp this key point, that will help removing sakkāya diṭṭhi (which is the key to the
Sotāpanna stage).
7. There is no NEW living being and there has not been a FIXED living being (i.e., a “soul” or an
“atma“) either. Life just moves from one existence to another based on what types of paṭisandhi
viññāṇa have been created in the past!
§ For example, one may be born many times with a human body while in the “human bhava“, but
when the energy for that “human bhava” runs out, that lifestream gets hold of a new bhava (as a
brahma, deva, animal, etc) which is the strongest paṭisandhi viññāṇa, i.e., the strongest kamma
(good or bad) done in the past.
§ If one is able to follow that “chain of past lives”, one will go through billions of past lives per
minute, but will never be able to find a “beginning” life!
§ A mental body or gandhabba (in different forms) has existed forever with any existing life-
form, as explained in #6 and #7 above.
§ The material body starts with a single cell created by the union of mother and father; that single
cell (zygote) multiplies over time and the body of an adult has trillions of cells.
9. As I pointed out towards the end of the previous post, a cell is the basic building block of a live
physical body. All living things (sentient beings and plants) are made of of cells.
§ Each of these cells come into existence from existing cells! No new cells are produced
individually. This is a very important point.
§ However, the first cells that appeared in the Earth were created by kammic energy (in javana
cittas); I will discuss this below.
§ Therefore, both mental and physical components of a human life has origins in the MIND.
10. Of course, there are many scientists today with the view that a “first cell” was created solely with
inert matter early in Earth’s history, within a billion years of the formation of the Earth.
§ This “first formation time” comes just from archeological studies. As new studies find
fossilized cells going back to earlier rocks, the time it took form the “first cell” has now been
pushed back within 300 million years of the formation of the Earth!
§ However, a living is cell is too complex to be formed via random combinations of inert
molecules no matter how long a time is given. It not just forming complex molecules of DNA,
but those DNA strands have a built-in program for life, just like a computer program.
12. So, we must realize that being alive and being conscious are two different things. Plants are alive
but they cannot think: plant cells just mechanically perform “pre-programmed” functions. On the
other hand, humans and animals are also made up of cells, but there is an additional entity associated
them: gandhabba or the mental body!
§ (It must be noted that all living beings have a mental body, and it is called manomaya kāya. A
manomaya kāya of a human or an animal is called a gandhabba, because it can inhale aroma —
gandhabba comes from “gandha” + “abba” or “taking in aroma or scents” –, and become
dense; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“).
§ It is amazing to see that even plant cells are very active, buzzing with activity. All cells are
programmed for various functions. Of course, different types of cells are programmed for
carrying out different tasks. This is an interesting topic that we do not want to get too much
involved in, because that can be a real distraction to the main task of learning Dhamma and
following the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ However, having at least a rough idea about the complexities of life can be a motivation to
learn more about Buddha Dhamma.
Complex Structure of a Cell
13. Here are two videos that explain the current status of understanding of cells. I will get to more
relevant aspects in the next post.
WebLink: youtube: Organelles of the Cell (updated)
14. Energy for ALL cells come from Solar energy. Plant cells first convert Solar energy to forms of
energy that can be used by animal cells. Therefore, plant cells play a major role in sustaining human
and animal life!
WebLink: youtube: Cells: Structure and Function
5.2.3 Clarification of “Mental Body” and “Physical Body” – Different
Types of “Kāya”
Introduction
1. There are words in Pāli that can have similar meanings. But one word may be better than another
word in a particular situation. That is also true in English or any other language.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, several Pāli words are used in different contexts regarding the “mental
body”. They are manomaya kāya, kammaja kāya, gandhabba, and paṭisandhi viññāṇa. I will try
to make things a bit clear in this post.
§ We need to keep in mind that the mind is very complex, and living beings in different realms
have different types of “mental bodies.” It is good to have a basic idea of these differences.
2. Most important here is to realize that these “mental bodies” are very different from the “physical
bodies” we see in humans and animals.
§ In particular, a brahma does not have a physical body at all. Then how can a Brahma see and
hear without physical eyes and ears, and a brain to process those signals? These are questions
that naturally arise in our minds. That is because we are not used to the concept of a “living
being” without a solid body.
§ The following discussion lays out a simple picture (with a few omissions to keep it more
uncomplicated). Based on the discussions at the forum, I can see that I may have inadvertently
use the “wrong term” to refer to the “mental body” in a few cases. I will try to stick to this
format in future posts.
Mental Body and Physical Body
3. All living beings have a “mental body” (“manomaya kāya“). Living beings in some realms also
have a “physical body” (āhāraja kāya).
§ So, the very first thing we need to realize that such a “kāya” is not the same as a “physical
body” that we are used to, weighing tens of kilograms or hundreds of pounds. The Pāli word
“kāya” means a collection. Even in English “body” is sometimes imply a collection of parts.
Some examples are, a “body of evidence” or “a body of water”. [kāya : (m.), a heap; a
collection; the body.]
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
498 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Therefore, an “āhāraja kāya” is a “collection of heavy components of a body” like the head,
arms, legs, eyes, ears, etc. That is what we call the “physical body.” It is also called a “karaja
kāya.”
§ A physical body grows by using energy intake from the food we eat. Eyes and ears, for
example, do not actually see or hear. Eyes and ears pass those signals to the brain. The brain
processes those signals send them to the corresponding pasāda rūpa in the manomaya kāya;
see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body.”
§ In other words, for beings like us with physical bodies, the sensory signals received by the five
physical senses (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and body). Then processes those signals and send to
the manomaya kāya. The manomaya kāya senses those signals.
§ As we have discussed in recent posts in this series, a physical body (of a human or an animal)
starts with a single cell called a zygote. The development of a complete human body, beginning
with that one cell is another fascinating story. Scientists have no idea how that happens via a
program that is in the DNA of that single cell. Who designed that program? See “Origin of
Life.”
Beings in Brahma and Deva Realms
6. Brahmas do not have an āhāraja kāya, and just have the kammaja kāya. The kammaja kāya of a
brahma has only a hadaya vatthu and TWO pasāda rūpa (cakkhu and sota) for seeing and hearing.
Still, they can see and hear with that ultra-fine “body” without having any eyes or ears (and brains)
like ours. Of course, it is tough for us to imagine such a living being.
§ Therefore, a brahma with just a manomaya kāya has a mass less than that of an electron. We
cannot see even a cell or an atom, let alone an electron. Now we can understand why we should
not think of “Brahma bodies” in the same sense as a “solid body”.
§ Those Brahmas cannot taste the food, smell odors, or touch things physically like we do. In
other words, they do not have ghāṇa, jivhā, and kāya pasāda rūpa).
§ By the way, Brahmas do not need food. Kammic energy sustains their lives. (Only the hadaya
vatthu and the two pasāda rūpa of cakkhu pasāda and sota pasāda need to be maintained).
6. Devās do have āhāraja kāya, but that is much finer, and we would not a deva if we come face-to-
face with one.
§ They have all five physical senses. Their food is just a drink called “amurta.” (That is probably
not the correct Pāli word, but that is the Sinhala — and probably Sanskrit — name for it).
§ Therefore, we need to be careful not to carry over our perceptions of “heavy bodies” to bodies
of other beings in other realms. Millions of devas and Brahmas were present to hear the first
discourse by the Buddha, according to the Vinaya Piṭaka. However, those five ascetics probably
did not even realize that at that time.
What is Gandhabba?
8. A human (or an animal) has a both a manomaya kāya and a āhāraja kāya. But the manomaya kāya
of a human has a special name of gandhabba due to the following reason.
§ A human bhava starts with the generation of a manomaya kāya (or kammaja kāya) by kammic
energy. For example, if an animal dies and gets a human bhava (which is extremely rare), a
human manomaya kāya will come out of that dead animal. If a deva dies and gets a human
bhava, a human manomaya kāya will appear in the human realm.
§ That human manomaya kāya has a hadaya vatthu and five pasāda rūpa as mentioned above.
However, it has the ability to absorb aroma (scents from plants and even food), and to get a bit
denser (unlike a brahma). Thus the name gandhabba (“gandha” + “abba” or “inhaling
aroma”) for the manomaya kāya of a human (or an animal).
§ Therefore, the name gandhabba is used only for the manomaya kāya of humans and animals.
§ Normal humans cannot see that relatively dense “body” of a gandhabba. They are in the “para
loka” (which is within the human realm).
What is the Connection of Gandhabba to Paṭisandhi Viññāṇa?
9. Another phrase used in some suttas to indicate a manomaya kāya of a human or animal (i.e., a
gandhabba) is paṭisandhi viññāṇa.
§ As we had discussed before, a human gandhabba could live for thousands of years until the end
of that human existence of “human bhava.” During that time, it can give rise to many “human
lives” (jāti) with different physical bodies.
§ For example, suppose one of those human jāti ends. At that moment, the gandhabba comes out
of the dead body and waits for another “matching womb.” (Gati of the gandhabba has to match
those of the parents, especially the mother). When a matching womb becomes available,
gandhabba is drawn to that womb. That is described in the post, “Buddhist Explanations of
Conception, Abortion, and Contraception.”
§ The WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā Taṇhāsaṅkhaya Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 38), describes
“descending of the gandhabba to the womb.” In the WebLink: suttacentral: Mahā Nidana Sutta
(Dīgha Nikāya 15) it is stated as “paṭisandhi viññāṇa descending to the womb.” That is because
a paṭisandhi viññāṇa created that gandhabba. That is discussed in detail in the post,
“Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka.”
The Physical Body Shields Manomaya Kāya of Humans and Animals
10. A question may have come up in the mind of some readers. Why cannot a gandhabba in a human
physical body directly sense the outside world without the help of the five physical senses (eyes, ears,
etc), if the brahmas can do that?
§ The dense physical body shields the manomaya kāya of the gandhabba. As long as the
gandhabba is inside the physical body, it is unable to get those “sense inputs” directly. Those
sensory inputs come through our “sense doors”, eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body. The
brain processes those signal and transmit them to the gandhabba (manomaya kāya). See, “Brain
– Interface between Mind and Body.”
§ We can compare this situation to a human operator inside an enclosed military tank. That
operator cannot see or hear anything outside. Audio and video equipment mounted on the tank
sends those signals to an on-board computer, which analyzes and displays them for the
operator.
§ In that analogy, video camera and audio equipment mounted on the tank act like the eyes and
ears of a human. The computer is like the brain. Without getting those signals, the operator is
totally blind and deaf to the outside world. In the same way, the manomaya kāya cannot receive
those sense inputs if the eyes are ears are damaged.
§ A detailed discussion at: “Our Mental Body – Gandhabba.”
11. But that manomaya kāya can be “kicked out of the physical body” in a traumatic situation, mostly
in cases of heart operations; such claims are categorized as “out-of-body experiences” (OBE). In such
cases, those people report being able to see doctors perform operations on their own bodies from the
ceiling (with their manomaya kāya).
§ It may also happen to people whom the doctors thought had died, but “come back to life” within
a short time. They report being able to travel with their manomaya kāya. Such cases are “near-
death experiences” (NDE).
§ Some others report being able to do “astral travel” with their manomaya kāya whenever they
like, see, “WebLink: wikipedia.org: Astral projection.” At least some reports in this category
seem to be valid. Reports of OBE and NDE are more trustworthy, because doctors and nurses
confirm the accounts of those patients.
§ These are discussed in the post, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE).”
5.2.4 Living Cell – How Did the First Cell Come to Existence?
§ For any given conscious living being, there is no traceable beginning to a first manomaya
When an existing manomaya kāya dies, mental energy or kammic energy creates a “new
kāya.
manomaya kāya.“ Furthermore, cells make up human (and animal) bodies, and the “first
cells” on this Earth were created by kammic energy long ago as we discuss below. All cells
of current living beings come from those first cells!
9. A physical body for a human or an animal is a collection of cells. It starts with a single cell (called
a zygote) and grows to a large mass with trillions of cells after a gandhabba (born of a paṭisandhi
viññāṇa) “descends to the womb” and gets possession of that zygote. For Tipiṭaka references, see,
“Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka.”
§ On the other hand, a brahma has no physical body made of cells. It is just the mental body
(gandhabba) with a trace of matter at the suddhaṭṭhaka level.
§ Below, we will discuss how “first cells” on Earth came to existence. We first need to consider
how complex a cell is.
The complexity of a Cell
10. Even the simplest cell is very complex and surprising. Even though nanotechnology has made
significant advances, it is nowhere close to being able to make a functioning cell.
§ The critical issue is not making new complex DNA molecules, but the following: Those DNA
strands in a cell nucleus are “coded with information,” just like a computer is
programmed.
§ Just like a computer program can run by itself and manage a factory, information coded in those
DNA strands in the nucleus of the cell control cell’s functions.
§ This “information” comes not by a Creator and not created via random jostling of molecules in
early Earth. It comes from kammic energy, just like a gandhabba is created by kammic energy.
11. In the following video, one can get a good idea about the basic layout and the complexity of a
cell.
WebLink: youtube: Organelles of the Cell (updated)
12. It becomes even more impressive when we look at how small an animal cell is. Here are some
rough numbers (in comparison, a mustard seed is 1 to 2 mm in diameter):
§ Cell (per side) 0.050 mm (or 50 micrometers).
§ Cell membrane 0.000007 mm thick.
13. But the most amazing thing is not that such a small cell has all that complexity. It is that a cell has
a “built-in computer-like program” that manages all cell functions, including what kind of proteins
are to produce. Yes. A living cell is a factory that makes proteins in addition to making copies of its
DNA.
§ In humans, a copy of the entire genome—more than 3 billion DNA base pairs—is contained in
all cells that have a nucleus. The DNA from a single human cell has a length of ~1.8 m or about
6 feet (but at a width of ~2.4 nanometers).
§ This genome has the blueprint for a given human (animal) body.
14. The machinery and the activities inside a cell — which we cannot see with the naked eye — are
impressive. As mentioned, a living cell is a pre-programmed, very sophisticated factory. Whatever
progress that nanotechnology has made cannot even come close to the level of a cell, as can be seen
with the following video:
WebLink: youtube: Ron Vale (UCSF, HHMI) 1: Molecular Motor Proteins
First Cells on Earth Created via Kammic Energy (Same as a
Gandhabba)
15. At present, the division of existing cells creates new cells of different properties (scientists do not
understand how!). A new human baby starts with a single cell (zygote) that is formed by the merger
of two cells from the mother and father.
§ In the newly-formed Earth, kammic energy created the first cells. That happened a long
time after the “first humans” who were without physical bodies. The early humans had very
subtle bodies (like brahmās), and thus, they did not have physical bodies with cells. Hundreds
of million years later, those early (Brahma-like) humans got back their “human gati,” and their
bodies become visible with a physical body made of cells.
§ The “first cells” come into existence via kammic energies from the past. Once they get started,
then the “normal method” of cell division led to more cells (what we see now).
§ In the same way, there are no new gandhabbas in the sense of starting a new lifestream. When
an existing gandhabba dies (at cuti-paṭisandhi), a new gandhabba takes its place because of a
new paṭisandhi viññāṇa (via Paticca Samuppāda).
§ Therefore, the MIND is the precursor to EVERYTHING. Even plant life has origins in
collective kammic energies of all conscious beings on Earth. Thus the Buddha declared,
“Manopubbangamā Dhammā..” or “mind is at the forefront of everything in this world.”
16. It is essential to realize that the dense physical body, say of a human being, is not directly created
by mental energy.
§ Mind energy provides the two seeds: gandhabba and the first cell, the zygote. Even there, only
the first-to-form cells on Earth had a direct connection to kammic energy when the first human
bodies “emerged from Brahma-like fine bodies.” These days, the fusion of two cells from
mother and father creates a zygote.
§ When a gandhabba merges with a zygote in a womb, that starts a process where no more
kammic energy is needed. That first “live cell” multiplies and leads to more and more cells
using sustenance from the mother, and that is how an embryo grows. After birth, a baby grows
by eating its food.
17. Another critical point is that the cells of ALL LIVING THINGS are similar, and they depend on
each other.
§ Cells of humans and animals are very similar. The differences come from the variations in the
genome (DNA that is inside the cell nucleus).
§ Even cells of plants are not that different. The main difference in a cell plant is the presence of
chloroplast, which generates energy using sunlight.
§ Energy to sustain bodies of humans and animals can be traced back to plants. Even though
humans and animals do eat other animals, it is those animals like cows who first extract energy
from plants.
§ Now we can see how inter-related and inter-dependent ALL LIFE is. And how complicated life
is, even at the physical level.
§ The mental body (gandhabba) is even more complicated. Only a Buddha can sort out these
complexities of life. We are fortunate to live at a time when modern science helps us clarify
some of his teachings.
5.2.5 Mystical Phenomena in Buddhism?
Introduction
Phenomena are labeled “mystical” or “incomprehensible” because there are no rational explanations.
However, logical explanations become available with gains in knowledge.
1. There are two essential points to make regarding my ongoing series of posts on the “origin of
Life,” and in general, regarding Buddha’s teachings.
§ Some characteristics of the other 29 realms in this world may not be compatible with our
ordinary sensory experiences. Some phenomena are not “perceivable” or “easily understood” to
humans. (Pāli word for “perceivable” is “gocara” pronounced “gochara”).
§ The second issue is how kammic energy can create a manomaya kāya with the ability to “see”
and “hear” without physical eyes or ears, and also create those “first cells” on Earth.
§ However, with the advances made in science, it is now possible to convince ourselves that such
phenomena are scientifically plausible. There are no contradictions with science, at least
theoretically (i.e., in principle).
§ We are fortunate to live at a time when scientific findings show that some of the “hard-to-
believe” phenomena discussed in the Tipiṭaka are consistent with science. In this post, I will
start with a couple of such issues (associated with “supernormal powers”).
Non-Perceivability of Some Phenomena
2. First, let me clarify what I mean by “perceivable” or “easily understood.” Our six senses can
“detect” only a tiny fraction of the “our world.”
§ We directly experience only the human and animal realms, where living beings can be “seen
with our eyes.” We do not have any experience with what kind of “bodies” those living beings
in other realms have. If we visit a brahma or a deva domain, for example, we may think that
there is “no one there.” Their bodies are too wispy to be seen with our eyes.
§ Even when scientists probe the universe with their best equipment, they also see only a small
fraction of “things” out there. At a base level, science today can account for only 4 percent of
the mass of our universe; see, “The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the
Race to Discover the Rest of Reality”, by Richard Panek (2011).
§ Many things have not been “discovered” by science yet. In particular, nothing significant about
the MIND.
3. Trying to gauge the validity of Buddha Dhamma with just what we can see with our eyes is
foolish. This is like a blind man trying to figure out what an elephant is like, by touching just a leg of
the elephant; see, “How do we Decide which View is Wrong View (Diṭṭhi)?“.
§ A frog living in a well does not know anything about the wider world. Similarly, an average
human — including scientists — faces the problem of trying to figure out the “reality” by only
using data available through our limited six senses. With the help of scientific instruments, we
are making progress.
§ Thus a scientific theory can’t be ever “complete” as proven by the mathematician Kurt Gödel;
see, “Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem.“ However, science is helping to clarify some concepts.
§ Unless one attains abhiññā powers and can visit those realms, one would not be able to verify
such characteristics of other domains. For example, we cannot see their ultra-fine bodies; see,
“Clarification of “Mental Body” and “Physical Body” – Different Types of “Kāya.”
§ However, if one spends time learning Dhamma, one would be able to see the truth of them. We
will discuss a few examples below.
Touching the Sun – Is That Possible?
4. Some phenomena described in the Tipiṭaka seem to be “mystical” or “beyond comprehension,” but
can be shown to be entirely feasible based on the advances in science. I will discuss a couple of
examples in the Tipiṭaka to illustrate this point. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Sāmaññaphala Sutta
(DN 2)”, it is stated, “.. imepi candimasūriye evaṃmahiddhike evaṃmahānubhāve pāṇinā parāmasati
parimajjati..” or, “.. he touches and strokes the Sun and the moon, so mighty and powerful..”.
§ This verse describes the powers of a yogi with supernormal capabilities (Iddhividha ñāṇa).
How can one “touch and stroke the Sun?” Isn’t the Sun supposed to be at an extremely hot?
§ Here, the yogi is in the manomaya kāya, not with his physical body. Of course, a physical body
will burn well before it gets close to the Sun. The key is to note that the manomaya kāya has
just a few suddhaṭṭhaka. For example, a human manomaya kāya has a hadaya vatthu and five
pasāda rūpa (where the five sense inputs of seeing, hearing, etc. are detected); see,
“Clarification of “Mental Body” and “Physical Body” – Different Types of “Kāya.”
§ A suddhaṭṭhaka is the smallest unit of matter in Buddha Dhamma and is billion times
smaller than an atom in modern science. Therefore, the manomaya kāya of a yogi is
unimaginably tiny; it is a “packet of energy.”
5. An entity at the level of suddhaṭṭhaka will not be affected by the Sun’s high temperatures or even
by a supernova explosion that will eventually destroy the whole Solar system. We can understand that
from modern science as follows: A regular fire can burn dense things like wood or paper. At higher
temperatures, melting ovens can melt steel bars. But neither of those can burn molecular gases like
hydrogen or nitrogen. Those gases burn at even higher temperatures.
§ However, even at the temperatures generated by a supernova explosion (basically blowing up
of the Sun at the end of a mahā kappa or an eon), matter at the suddhaṭṭhaka level is not
affected.
§ When the Earth and the Sun are destroyed at the end of a mahā kappa, all brahma realms
lying at or above the Abhassara brahma realm are NOT destroyed. Those Brahmas have
very fine bodies (with only a trace of matter) that are not affected even by a supernova; see,
“Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
§ Well before that destruction, all living beings in our world move up to the Abhassara brahma
realm.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
506 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Now we can see how a yogi with a manomaya kāya of a brahma CAN indeed touch the Sun.
That is not a miracle. It is just that a manomaya kāya is so fine that it is not affected by
even a supernova which has much more power than the Sun.
6. The same sutta (and many other suttas) also describe the ability of yogis with iddhi powers to go
through walls and dive into the Earth and come out from a different location, among others. To
explain that this is theoretically possible, let me first discuss some aspects of atoms and molecules
uncovered by modern science.
The following verse appears in many suttas in the WebLink: suttacentral: Iddhipāda Saṃyutta of the
Saṃyutta Nikāya (SN 51.11 through SN 51.32): “Ye hi keci, bhikkhave, etarahi samaṇā vā
brāhmaṇā vā anekavihitaṃ iddhividhaṃ paccanubhonti—ekopi hutvā bahudhā honti, bahudhāpi
hutvā eko honti; āvibhāvaṃ, tirobhāvaṃ; tirokuṭṭaṃ tiropākāraṃ tiropabbataṃ asajjamānā
gacchanti, seyyathāpi ākāse; pathaviyāpi ummujjanimujjaṃ karonti, seyyathāpi udake; udakepi
abhijjamāne gacchanti, seyyathāpi pathaviyaṃ; ākāsepi pallaṅkena kamanti, seyyathāpi pakkhī
sakuṇo; imepi candimasūriye evaṃmahiddhike evaṃmahānubhāve pāṇinā parimasanti parimajjanti;
yāva brahmalokāpi kāyena vasaṃ vattenti, ..”
Translated: “Bhikkhus, a bhikkhu or a brāhmana who has developed supernormal powers (iddhi)
wields various psychic powers: He can become many copies of himself. He appears and vanishes. He
travels unimpeded through walls, ramparts, and mountains, and dives in and out of the Earth
as if it were water. He walks on water without sinking as if it were earth. Sitting cross-legged, he
travels through space like a winged bird. With his hand, he touches and strokes the Sun and the
Moon, so mighty and powerful. He displays mastery as far as the brahmā-realms..”.
§ It is also evident in this verse that it could be anyone who can cultivate these powers, not just
Buddhists.
§ Let us first clarify a few things with science, and then we will discuss how it is possible to “go
through walls and dive into the Earth.”
§ P.S. If it is possible to take out all that empty space in our bodies (which of course is not
possible), all the matter in the bodies of 9 billion humans in the world today can be fit inside a
sugar cube!
§ If our atoms are mostly space, why can’t we pass through walls like those ghosts in movies?
§ Electrical repulsion among the electron clouds of neighboring atoms forces them to stay away
without getting close.
§ Therefore, we cannot go through walls or any other “solid object” with our physical
bodies.
10. Those objects that appear to be “highly condensed” — such as walls or even steel — are mostly
hollow at the atomic level. An atom has a tiny nucleus surrounded by an “electron cloud.” The size of
the atom is defined by the electron cloud, which is spread out over a relatively large volume. Two
adjacent atoms cannot come too close to each other because of the mutual repulsion between their
electron clouds.
§ Therefore, an atom is “virtually empty.” The dense nucleus takes only a little volume, and the
electron cloud is far away. Therefore, a manomaya kāya made of only a few suddhaṭṭhaka can
freely move through “solid matter” made of atoms and molecules.
§ A yogi with such abhiññā powers could use the manomaya kāya to travel through “solid
objects.”
§ One with even more developed abilities may be able to reduce one’s physical body to the
suddhaṭṭhaka level, go through the “solid object” and then “reassemble” at the other end. That
sounds like science fiction (“teleportation”), but that is precisely how it may be done in the
future with further progress in science. Of course, one with such abhiññā powers would be able
to do that right now.
§ P.S. An account from the Tipiṭaka regarding “teleportation”: Ven. Ananda attained the
Arahanthood only the day before the first Buddhist Council held 3 months after the
Parinibbāna of the Buddha. Only Arahants were allowed to participate. Everyone was waiting
for the arrival of Ven. Ananda. In order to remove any doubts of those who were present that he
had indeed attained the Arahanthood — complete with all iddhi powers — Ven. Ananda is said
to have entered the room through the keyhole in the door. So, this is an example of
teleportation.
Summary and Other Implications
11. Other “mysterious phenomena” in verse in #6 above can also be explained to be consistent with
science. As science makes progress, these clarifications will have more support.
§ I will be discussing some of those other phenomena in the future after covering necessary
background material.
12. On a side note, this clarification also helps us understand that our concept of “touching someone”
is not as intimate as we think. It is only the outer electrons of the atoms (molecules) on our body
“touching” the same on the other object or person.
§ I am very serious about this. Suppose you are blind-folded and someone touches you on the
arm. If you think it is your girl (boy) friend, that will make you generate sensual thoughts. If
you are under the impression that it is your parent, you will feel only affectionate feelings of a
different kind. If you think it is a total stranger (and not good looking!), you may barely notice
it (which happens a lot).
13. I must also emphasize that the Buddha not only discouraged but banned in most cases, display of
such supernormal powers by bhikkhus. The main reason for that was explained to Kevatta by the
Buddha in the WebLink: suttacentral: Kevaṭṭa Sutta (DN 11). The English translation there:
“WebLink: suttacentral: To Kevaṭṭa (DN 11)“.
§ So, there were people at the time of the Buddha who could do such “miracles” using special
techniques like “Gandhāra magic trick” (gandhārī nāma vijjā). Some others cultivated
supernormal powers via anariya jhāna. Then such people can put down Buddha Dhamma,
saying that “I can also do those things without Buddha’s teachings.”
§ Even today, some magicians perform such “miracles.” Here is a video showing “WebLink:
youtube: Criss Angel walking on water”.
Of course, it is an illusion. But it looks real! Criss Angel discusses these illusions or magic tricks in
his book, “Mindfreak” (2007).
§ However, only Buddha Dhamma can make it possible to stop future suffering, and that is not
possible with magic tricks!
5.2.6 Views on Life
August 4, 2019
Introduction
The issue of the origin of life is critical to Sakkāya Diṭṭhi, which is one of the key wrong views to be
removed to attain the Sotapanna stage. I have discussed some background material in the past several
posts. It is time to take an in-depth look at each of the three views on the origin of life.
1. As I have already mentioned in the past few posts, there are two wrong views regarding life.
§ The materialistic view says life has origins in inert matter. Science says 108 or so atoms make
everything in this world. Somehow consciousness with feelings, perceptions, desires, and hopes
arise out of inert matter. Many scientists and atheists hold this view.
§ Those who are faithful followers of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) or
Hinduism believe that there is a separate “mental component” that makes the inert physical
body “alive” with feelings, perceptions, desires, and hopes (four mental aggregates). A Creator
God or Mahā Brahma created life according to them.
2. We also need to keep in mind the “endpoints of a life” according to those two views.
§ In the materialistic view, one lives only the present life, and it all ends with the death of the
physical body. This view was called “ucceda diṭṭhi“ by the Buddha because here the life ends
(ucceda means “cut off”) with the death of the physical body.
§ In the opposite view, the “mental body” survives even after the physical body dies. In
Abrahamic religions, the “soul” either is born in heaven or “hell” forever. In Hinduism, the
“ātma” keeps going through the rebirth process until one is born in the Mahā Brahma realm,
which is again eternal. In either case, one will eventually live forever (in heaven, hell, or the
Brahma realm). This view was called “sassata diṭṭhi” (sassata means “eternal”) by the
Buddha.
3. In refuting those two views, the Buddha taught that there is a “mental component” to life, but that
is not a “soul” or “a ātma” going from one life to the next.
§ That is because everything in this world arises due to causes. Life can many different forms
(human, deva, brahma, animal, peta, hell-beings, etc.). When one such existence ends
another of those arise depending on which causes (kamma vipāka) come into play.
§ “Good” or “bad” forms of life arise due to “good” or “bad” actions done in the past, and the net
result of existence in the “long term” is suffering (mainly because most kammā lead to “bad
births”).
§ There is no “soul” or a “ātma” that can be considered to be “me” or “my essence.” As long as
one has that perception, the rebirth process will continue with much suffering.
§ When one realizes the truth of this reality, one will stop grasping (upādāna) new existences.
The Conception and Birth of a Baby
4. Let us focus on human life. When the fertile mother (i.e., who has ovulated) has sex with the
father, that leads to seed for a new life. The following is a summary extracted from “WebLink: Stages
of Development of the Fetus.”
§ During each normal menstrual cycle, one of the ovaries release an egg. The release of the egg is
called ovulation. The egg enters the funnel-shaped end of one of the fallopian tubes.
§ Within 5 minutes of having sex, sperms from the father move from the vagina to the fallopian
tube.
§ If a sperm penetrates the egg, fertilization results. The fusion of the egg and sperm produces
a new cell called a zygote, which is the “seed of life” for a brand new baby.
5. Tiny hairlike cilia lining the fallopian tube propel the zygote toward the uterus. The cells of the
zygote repeatedly divide as the zygote moves down the fallopian tube. The zygote enters the uterus in
3 to 5 days.
§ In the uterus, the cells continue to divide, becoming a hollow ball of cells called a blastocyst.
Between five and eight days after fertilization, the blastocyst attaches to the lining of the uterus,
usually near the top. This process, called implantation, is completed by day 9 or 10. The inner
cells develop into the embryo, and the outer cells develop into the placenta.
§ Some of the cells from the placenta develop into an outer layer of membranes (chorion) around
the developing blastocyst. Other cells develop into an inner layer of membranes (amnion),
which form the amniotic sac. When the sac is formed (by about day 10 to 12), the blastocyst is
considered an embryo. The amniotic sac fills with a clear liquid (amniotic fluid) and expands to
envelop the developing fetus, which floats within it.
6. Most internal organs and external body structures get built in this stage. Most organs begin to form
about three weeks after fertilization, which equals five weeks of pregnancy. (Doctors date pregnancy
from the first day of the woman’s last menstrual period, which is typically two weeks before
fertilization).
§ At the end of the 8th week after fertilization (10 weeks of pregnancy), the embryo is considered
a fetus. Almost all organs are entirely formed by about ten weeks after fertilization (which
equals 12 weeks of pregnancy). The exceptions are the brain and spinal cord, which continue to
form and develop throughout pregnancy.
· By about 24 weeks: The fetus has a chance of survival outside the uterus. The lungs continue to
mature until near the time of delivery. The brain accumulates new cells throughout pregnancy
and the first year of life after birth.
Materialistic View
7. The above process describes the steps in the formation of the “physical body” of a new human
being. It cannot identify the time “when the mental stuff” is activated, i.e., when that inert
zygote becomes alive.
§ Some say “life of the new baby” starts when the heartbeat starts, and at the other extreme some
say when the baby is capable of surviving outside the womb; see, for example, “WebLink:
When Does a Human Life Begin? 17 Timepoints“.
§ According to Buddha Dhamma, the new life starts when a gandhabba (or patisandhi viññāna)
“descends to the womb and takes possession of the zygote.” That happens very early, within a
day or two of the formation of the zygote; see, “Buddhist Explanations of Conception,
Abortion, and Contraception.”
8. Besides the above hurdle, the materialistic view cannot explain how that single cell or the zygote
gives rise to a complex human with many trillions of different types of cells.
§ Even though we all start with a single cell, the cells in different parts of our bodies are very
different. Liver cells are different from heart cells, and the cells in the brain — called neural
cells or neurons — are much more diverse.
§ Furthermore, how do these cells know when to start building different cells for liver, heart,
brain, arms, legs, etc.?
an evolutionist and the latter by a creationist. structures of two base pairs are shown in the
bottom right.
However, it is not necessary to study this
complex issue in detail; it is enough to “get the basic idea.”
Fundamental Problems with the Materialistic View
10. Two key issues remain unresolved. The first is, how did this complex DNA structure evolve,
starting with simple molecules?
§ In 1953, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey mixed chemicals in a simulated “early-Earth
atmosphere” and produced amino acids — precursors of DNA. It received much publicity as a
significant clue to the origin of life. But that is a far cry from making a working cell in a
laboratory. No one has even come close to that in the 65 years following that “breakthrough.”
§ The videos in my previous posts discuss this problem at length; see, “Origin of Life – There is
No Traceable Origin” and “Living Cell – How Did the First Cell Come to Existence?“.
11. There is an even more critical issue: Is it even possible for such a complex “genetic code” to
evolve?
§ Those of us who have written computer programs know that even a simple program requires
“planning” and would not work unless it is free of “bugs.” Even though it is relatively easy to
“fix a bug” with KNOWLEDGE of the code, it is unimaginable that a bug in such a
sophisticated program can “get fixed” via a random “trial and error” process. In such a random
process, it is more likely to “add more errors” to code than fixing an existing error.
§ The following review paper summarizes current status: “WebLink: pdf file: Koonin and
Novozhilov- Origin and Evolution of Universal Genetic Code – 2017“,
§ For those who like to find more details, I recommend Ref. 3 below. The author is offering 10
million dollars to anyone illustrating the feasibility of the evolution of genetic code; see,
“WebLink: evo2.org: Evolution 2.0“. I recommend watching the video there. It is not really
about the prize; he explains why it is an impossibility.
12. Darwin’s original theory of evolution predicted a “gradual evolution” of SPECIES, i.e., simple
lifeforms evolving to complex lifeforms. However, “neo Darwinism” of the present time is trying to
tackle the following key issues.
§ Recent studies reveal that the GENETIC CODE is virtually the same for many species, ranging
from mice to humans (in animals with a few cells, the genome is small). In other words, the
DNA in mice essentially has the code to start a human life, but those sections in the program
are NOT TRIGGERED for mice; see Ref. 1 for details.
§ That is a critical point. The CODE Is virtually the same in many lifeforms, but the
“correct sections of the code” must be triggered for each species. It is as if someone had
planned for all lifeforms in advance!
§ It is just that different parts of the code get activated for different species! That raises the
second issue. WHO (or WHAT in the code) triggers specific genes to be enabled in
different species AND at the right time (e.g., fingers come after the arms)?
§ That is possibly why some evolutionist scientists are switching to the creationist side (Dr.
Francis Collins, the director of the Human Genome Project is an example). There has not been
a third alternative (because most people do not know — or understand — Buddha’s version).
In the next post, I will discuss problems associated with the creationist view (sassata diṭṭhi).
REFERENCES
1. “Endless Forms Most Beautiful” by Sean B. Carrol (2005).
2. “Signature in the Cell” by Stephen C. Meyer (2009).
3. “Evolution 2.0: Breaking the Deadlock Between Darwin and Design” by Perry Marshall
(2017).
5.2.6.2 Wrong View of Creationism (and Eternal Future Life) – Part 1
Introduction
1. The concept of eternal future life is built into most of the religions today. It comes in two varieties.
§ In Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam), one is born only once. Then at the
end of this life, one is either taken to heaven or hell for eternity.
§ In Hinduism, one has born before, will reborn again and again, until one is born in the Mahā
Brahma realm. Then one will live there forever.
§ Both varieties require a Creator (God or Mahā Brahma).
§ (Please note that the intent of my post is just to lay down the facts (to my knowledge). If I have
miswritten something, please post a comment at the discussion forum or send me an email at
[email protected]. I would be happy to correct any errors.)
2. In the time of the Buddha, there was only the latter view associated with a future eternal life.
However, in both the above cases, the expectation is that one will have eternal life at the end. Such a
view of eternal life was called sassata ditthi by the Buddha (“sassata” means eternal).
§ As we recall from my previous post, “Views on Life – Wrong View of Materialism,” this is the
opposite of the wrong that life ends with death in this life. That was called uccheda ditthi
(“ucceda” means cut off) by the Buddha.
§ As we know, the Buddha explained 62 types of wrong views in the WebLink: suttacentral:
Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1). However, the two main wrong views REGARDING LIFE are the
above. Some of those 62 wrong views are on whether the world is eternal or not, and whether
the world is finite or not.
Eternal Life in Hinduism and Abrahamic Religions
3. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1), the Buddha explained how some people at
that time concluded eternal soul or atta (ātma in Sanskrit/Hinduism).
§ There were yogis, even before the Buddha, who could attain (anariya) jhāna and with them the
ability to recall past lives. Some were able to recall hundreds and thousands of past lives. One
may change the form of birth (human, deva, etc.), but each birth associated with “oneself.”
§ Some of them had cultivated abhiññā powers to higher levels, where they could “see” very far
back. They could see many destructions/re-formations of the world (i.e., many mahā kappās).
Even for such long times, they could see their “ātma” or “atta” taking different forms, but it
was the “same self” who acquired such various forms.
§ The Buddha gave an analogy in the Brahmajāla Sutta. A person may live in a particular city for
several years during childhood, move to another to go to school, get a job in a yet another city,
and eventually retire in yet a different country. But that person has the perception that it was
“me” who was at all those different places, with different physical bodies. Going through
different lives is similar; there is a perception of “me” or “self” or “soul” (ātma/atta).
4. Now we can see a difference in views of Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.
§ The concept of rebirth is firmly in Hinduism. That is coming for a long time even before the
Buddha Gōtama. It is based on the experience of ancient yōgis who had cultivated the ability to
look at past lives.
§ On the other hand, rebirth is entirely absent in Abrahamic religions. So, the origin of human life
in Abrahamic religions is purely materialistic. The only requirement is to have a zygote created
by the union of the mother’s egg and father’s sperm. Therefore, there is some overlap here with
the materialistic view of life; see, “Views on Life – Wrong View of Materialism“.
§ However, as far as the end of life is concerned, both Abrahamic religions and Hinduism have a
similar view. That one attains eternal life at the end.
Issues Only Relevant to Abrahamic Religions
5. The other difference between Abrahamic religions and Hinduism is that in the former, one is born
only once AND gets only this life to work towards getting eternal life in heaven. If one misses that
opportunity, one will be committed to the hell for eternity.
§ The Bible clearly says one dies only once and then faces judgment (WebLink: biblia.com:
Hebrews 9:27). The Bible never mentions people having a second chance at life or coming back
as different people or animals. WebLink: biblia.com: Matthew 25:46 says explicitly that
believers go on to eternal life while unbelievers go onto eternal punishment. As I understand,
Judaism and Islam have the same concept.
§ I wonder what happens to a baby dying very young. Does it go to heaven or hell? What about a
mentally disabled person? It does not seem to be fair if they are committed to hell for eternity.
If they do get qualified to be born in heaven, it would be better to skip this life (be killed as a
baby) and be born in heaven right away.
§ I may not be aware of the details on that issue. But it is an important issue. As I mentioned
earlier, I welcome comments. The goal is to have a clear and correct picture of different world
views.
6. Since this is the “first life” for any human alive today (since there is no rebirth process in
Abrahamic religions), the following question arises. Why is it that people are born healthy/with
disabilities, poor/rich, beautiful/ugly, etc.?
§ To put it another way, is each of us a “new creations of the Creator”? If so, why did he choose
to create some of us with disabilities, for example? If we did not have prior lives, there was no
basis to differentiate among new births.
§ Furthermore, was the “soul” of an existing individual created at the time of his/her conception
or birth?
§ There are simple questions that need answers, in my opinion.
7. I do understand that the Creator God is supposed to have “breathed life” to Adam and Eve made
them in his image. But not to animals; they do not have a soul in Abrahamic religions).
§ Animals are made of the same “stuff” as humans. As I discussed in the previous post, many
animals have DNA that is 99% the same as those for humans; see, “Views on Life – Wrong
View of Materialism.”
§ Animals are supposed to be there for the consumption of humans. That also does not seem to be
logical.
Issues Only Relevant to Hinduism
8. The Purush-Sukta, a section of the Rig Veda, describes the divine origin of human beings into the
four social groups, or castes, that comprise Hindu society: Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Sudra.
According to the Purush-Sukta, brahmins born from the mouth of the Brahma, kshatriya from the
arms, vaishya from the thighs, and sudra from the calves.
§ This categorization comes at the beginning of the Agganna Sutta (DN 27). Vāseṭṭha, himself a
brahmin, tells the Buddha that other brahmins say to him that he should not associate with
lower-caste people. Followers of the Buddha came from all four castes. They tell him that,
“Only brahmins are genuine children of Brahmā, born of his mouth, offspring of Brahmā,
created by Brahmā, heirs of Brahmā.”
§ The Buddha tells Vāseṭṭha that all people today are womb-born.
§ Then he proceeded to give an account of how all “first humans” at the beginning of this Mahā
Kappa were born instantaneously (ōpapatika births) with brahma-like bodies, and how they
“evolved” over the past several billions of years to end up with “womb-born births”; see,
“Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
§ The current series on the “Origin of Life” will provide more details from that sutta. Darwin’s
theory of evolution is somewhat correct for the appearance of increasingly complex animal
species over time. It is not right to say that humans have “evolved from animals.” Furthermore,
a “first living cell” can’t evolve from inert matter to form the primitive animal species either, as
we have discussed in recent posts.
9. As in the case of a Creator God in Abrahamic religions, why did Mahā Brahma create four classes
of humans at the beginning, per #7 above? Why not create them all equal?
§ Did Mahā Brahma also create animals as well? Can humans be born as animals? If so, do
animals have a ātma?
§ I may be ignorant of these issues. One problem that I have had with Hinduism is that there are
so many different versions. One good example is that in some Hindu temples animal sacrifice is
carried out regularly. On the other hand, there are other Hindus who abstain from eating meat,
let alone killing animals!
§ The best way to clarify these issues is to start a discussion at the discussion forum. Then I can
revise this post based on that discussion if needed. I have opened a new topic to discuss any of
the posts in the “Origin of Life” series: “Questions on Posts in the “Origin of Life”
Subsection“.
I will discuss apparent problems associated with all creator-based religions in the next post.
5.2.6.3 Wrong View of Creationism (and Eternal Future Life) – Part 2
In the previous post, “Wrong View of Creationism (and Eternal Future Life) – Part 1“, we discussed
some problems associated with creationism. We will continue that discussion.
How Did the Creator Come to Existence?
Now we can get to the issues which are common to Abrahamic religions and Hinduism.
1. First of all, the inevitable question is, how did the Creator (God or Mahā Brahma) come to
existence? The Principle of Causality, the foundation of modern science, says things do not happen
or materialize without causes.
§ The idea of a Creator as “the First Cause” has a long history; see the Wikipedia article,
“WebLink: wikipedia: Cosmological argument.”
§ Logically it cannot be defended, but it has come to be a belief for those who have faith in a
Creator.
2. In the previous post, we saw a crucial difference between Buddhism and Hinduism. (Even though
the concept of rebirth is there in both.) In Hinduism, there is the belief of an everlasting existence in
the Mahā Brahma realm (or reunification with the Brahman).
§ Of course, a similar concept is there with Abrahamic religions too, with eternal life in heaven or
hell.
§ However, the idea of rebirth is absent in Abrahamic faiths.
§ Let us now focus on the issue of “eternal life” after death, which is in Abrahamic religions
and Hinduism.
3. In Abrahamic religions, the Creator God lives in the heavens. If one lives a moral life, one will get
to live “in the heavens” forever; see the Wikipedia article, “WebLink: wikipedia: Heaven in
Christianity.”
§ In Hinduism, the Creator Brahma lives in a Brahma realm; see the Wikipedia article,
“WebLink: wikipedia: Brahma.” One can be born there, by living a moral life and by
cultivating jhāna.
§ Therefore, all Creator-based religions assume the existence of a heavenly plane where life is
permanent. Once born there, one will live forever without ever dying.
Nothing in This World Is Forever
4. Stars in the heavens appear to be serene and shiny. Even though we see beautiful and calm “starry
nights,” the outer space is a violent place.
§ In reality, a typical star converts millions of tons of mass into energy every second, with each
gram releasing as much energy as an atomic bomb!
§ Within the range of our telescopes, there are several supernova explosions per second. A
supernova is the explosion of a star at the end of its lifetime.
§ Therefore, even though our ancestors thought that Gods reside among those nice-looking stars,
and the heavens are stable and peaceful, the reality is very different.
5. The Buddha’s world view (which is based on experience, as we will discuss in upcoming posts) is
that no existence is everlasting. Life in any heavenly realm (Deva or Brahma realms) is finite, even
though some can be very long lifetimes.
§ At the time of the Buddha, Abrahamic religions were not there. He has addressed the issue of
everlasting life in the Mahā Brahma realm in several suttas. We will discuss that in future
posts.
§ Before that, let us look at the scientific evidence that any type of matter (which essential for
life) has a finite lifetime.
6. A permanently-existing heavenly body is in contradiction with modern science as well as with
Buddha’s description of 31 realms where every life ends at some point. Even though Deva and
Brahma realms have long lifetimes, they are not free of death.
§ In current scientific theories, the whole universe will run down in several billion years.
§ Furthermore, each star is either destroyed in a violent blast (some are called “supernova”) or
will be subjected to “heat death” reaching the white dwarf stage; see the Wikipedia article,
“WebLink: wikipedia: Star.”
§ In Buddha Dhamma, clusters of star systems (cakkavāla) get destroyed periodically. Even
though higher-lying realms do survive, living beings in those realms also have finite lifetimes.
After many billions of years, those star systems re-form. So, it is a cyclic process where
destruction is followed by rebirth (re-formation), just like for a living being; see, “Buddhism
and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
The Problem of Suffering
7. Then there is the critical issue of why would a Creator let the man that he created to suffer? He
could have created a suffering-free world.
§ The general explanation in Christianity is that Adam and Eve sinned.
§ But the Creator could have made it not possible for Adam and Eve to sin. Furthermore, it does
not make sense for the descendants to punished for the sins of Adam and Eve.
§ And why is it that some are born to suffer (mentally retarded or handicapped, for example)?
What is the explanation for some people born that way? Also, why are some born poor,
compared to others who are born rich?
8. As I mentioned in a previous post, “Views on Life – Wrong View of Materialism,” some scientists
like Francis Collins and James Tour have given up belief in the theory of evolution. They have
become proponents of creationism since they do not see another option.
§ We discussed James Tour’s views in the post, “Origin of Life – There is No Traceable Origin.”
9. Francis Collins has written a book about why he changed his views to become a creationist. I have
written a post to critically examine the issues that he could not explain with creationism: ““The
Language of God” by Francis Collins.” Please read that post for details, but the following are the key
points.
§ As I pointed out there, Dr. Collins faced the same difficulties as C. S. Lewis in trying to explain
why God left room for suffering.
§ Why would God allow the existence of Satan and the associated immoral behavior by people?
The main conclusion was that God chose to give the man free will, and the man abused it. But
God could have given free will without the existence of Satan or the ability to sin.
§ The existence of “Moral Law” (the ability to differentiate right from wrong) is the fundamental
basis for his belief in God. However, that argument works for all religions.
§ These are critical issues that do not have answers in creationism world views.
§The critical issue for them is about the “origin of life” and not the evolution of species. In other
words, many creationists agree that once life got started with simple life-forms, more complex
life-forms evolved gradually.
§ In fundamental terms, the critical question is, “how did the first cell come to existence”?
11. Of course, the evolutionists believe that the first living cell also evolved, starting from inert atoms
and molecules.
§ However, evolutionists have very little to say about how a first cell came to existence. I have
read many books by evolutionists, and they mainly discuss just the evolution of species. They
have very little evidence or even feasibility of how complex DNA molecules assembled,
starting with simple atoms and molecules in random chemical reactions.
§ They have even less to say about how the genetic code could have evolved. As I emphasized in
previous posts, it is hard to imagine how such a program could develop in a random process.
We know that computer codes do not “evolve.” Furthermore, any accidental changes in the
working computer code will only break that code, not make it better!
Intelligent Design Argument
12. As I mentioned above, some scientists have convinced themselves that a living cell with DNA
code can’t evolve. However, they are not comfortable with the concept of a Creator God.
§ They have come up with the concept of “intelligent design.” They do not explicitly invoke a
Creator God but insist that a higher intelligence must have designed a living cell.
§ That is also called the “Teleological argument.” See the Wikipedia article, “WebLink:
wikipedia: Teleological argument.”
13. As explained in that Wikipedia article, the phrase “argument from design” was first used by
William Paley, an English clergyman, in 1802. He said that if one finds a clock on the beach, one can
safely conclude that the watch must have had a designer. In the same way, complex living beings
must have had a “designer.”
§ Modern advocates of the intelligent design argument point out that a cell is much more
complicated than a watch, and that it could not have evolved due to random processes.
§ However, that does not solve the problem. Such a “designer” must have super-human
capabilities, and thus is not that different from the idea of a Creator. The idea of a creator or a
designer runs contradictory to the Principle of Causation, upon which science is based (see #1
above).
Summary
14. The existence of permanent life and suffering are two critical problems with the creator-based
origin of life. However, there are many related issues.
§ Can the life of a human arise randomly? In other words, why are humans born under very
different conditions of health, wealth, beauty, etc.? Neither evolutionists nor creationists (or
“intelligent designers”) can explain it. They all say, “it just happens that way.”
§ The second issue has to do with the origin of life (not the evolution of species). How did life
originate? For example, how did the first cell with its complex double-helix DNA structure
AND the genetic code come to existence? The two sides have different explanations for that
issue.
15. Materialists believe that a living cell can arise via random jostling of atoms and molecules which
are inert “matter.” The critical question here is, is it at all possible for that to happen in a random
process? Another significant issue that we have not even discussed is: How can feelings,
perception, desires, hopes, etc. arise from “dead matter”?
§ Creationists (and those who believe that a creator or a designer with super-human intelligence
in “intelligent design”) created living cells. That creator gave life to inert matter. There the
question is, how did that creator or designer come to existence?
Buddhist Explanation
16. In Buddha Dhamma, this “intelligent designer” is none other than Nature. The life itself was
not created but has existed forever. That is consistent with the Principle of Causality. Of course,
Buddha provided (indirect) evidence in terms of a fully self-consistent “theory.”
§ Furthermore, the mental qualities of a human are the CAUSES of existence (rebirth): It is
not possible to create a life-stream. All existing life-streams have ALWAYS existed. That life-
form takes different forms in different existences (not only human and animal, but among 31
possible realms). See, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Life-stream“.
§ Future existences of a given life-stream DEPEND on the “mental qualities” (and actions,
speech, thoughts that arise BASED ON those mental qualities) of that life-stream.
§ Suffering and pleasure exist in this world. Both arise due to previous actions (kamma).
And one’s deeds are based on one’s mental state at that time.
17. When one understands those key concepts, one will “see” that there is no “attā” or “soul” or
“ātma” going from birth-to-birth. That is the first stage of Sammā Diṭṭhi. Causes (kamma) and
conditions lead to corresponding outcomes (kamma vipāka) per Paṭicca Samuppāda. That
understanding is the key to removing “sakkāya diṭṭhi.”
§ We will first discuss those “mental qualities” next. It is essential to understand those to discuss
Buddha’s teachings of life. His world views were not speculation but based on his ability to
“see” how life progressed over trillions of years in the past. It is NOT JUST a logical or
philosophical argument, even though it is self-consistent.
§ It is critical to understand the essential points discussed so far to continue with upcoming posts.
I recommend re-reading #16 and #17 until those key ideas are grasped at least vaguely.
5.2.6.4 Worldview of the Buddha
Introduction
1. The Buddhist worldview is somewhat complicated but is self-consistent. In the previous three
posts, we discussed the two dominant world views of evolutionism and creationism. The Buddha
categorized them respectively as uccheda diṭṭhi and sassata diṭṭhi in the “WebLink: suttacentral:
Brahmajāla Sutta (DN 1)“. When one removes both those wrong views, one would have removed
sakkāya diṭṭhi and attained the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
§ In both those world views, there is the idea of an “existing person.” Evolutionists say that “a
person” ends with the death of the physical body. Creationists say that the “soul” or the “ātma”
of “a person” will get an “everlasting life” at some point. See the discussion so far at “Origin of
Life.”
§ The Buddha taught that the existence of such “a person” is illusory. At each moment, there is
an experience that arises due to past causes AND based on prevailing conditions. That
“conditional cause and effect” or the Principle of Causality is called Paticca Samuppāda.
However, those experiences and any physical sufferings are real.
2. Thus, in the Buddhist worldview, “a person,” at a given time, may be defined as a “set of gati” or
“character qualities.” Those gati are the conditions to bring about the results (vipāka) of past actions
(kamma). When one gets rid of those “gati,” that will lead to the stopping of those sense experiences
burdened with suffering. That is Parinibbāna or “full release from suffering.” However, the
perception (saññā) of such “a person” will be there until one attains the Arahanthood.
§ That is a very brief summary. With this post, we will start discussing the details.
3. The “material or physical world” takes precedence in current dominant world views of
evolutionism and creationism. Evolutionists consider mental aspects as secondary and to arise from
inert matter. Thus, they believe the mind is an emergent phenomenon.
§ Even the creationists do not pay much attention to the diverse mind phenomena. They believe
that the mind is separate from matter and that the Creator created both.
§ Buddha has taught material aspects briefly but focused on the mind in great detail. Furthermore,
he has explained that the opposite of materialism is the correct worldview. That is, instead of
mind phenomena arising from inert matter, the mind is the precursor to matter.
§ That may sound astounding. That is why we need to go through the steps slowly. But it is
essential first to remind ourselves that it is not possible to create a brand-new “life-stream” or a
“new living being.”
A Life-Stream (Rebirth Process) Has No Beginning
4. All living beings (an infinite number of them) have lived from a time that has “no traceable
beginning.” That is a cornerstone of the Buddhist worldview.
§ The Buddha declared that as, “Anamataggoyaṃ, bhikkhave, saṃsāro.” That means “bhikkhus,
there is no discernible beginning to the rebirth process.” This statement is in every sutta in
the “WebLink: suttacentral: Anamatagga Saṃyutta” in Saṃyutta Nikāya (SN).
§ You and I have existed “forever.” We will continue to live in one of the 31 realms until we
attain the Arahanthood and then attain Parinibbāna. Parinibbāna means “complete Nibbāna.”
That is completely separating from this world of 31 realms. No more rebirths in this world. No
more suffering.
§ I have discussed this in detail in the post, “Origin of Life – There is No Traceable Origin.”
5. The above statement of a life existing from a time with no traceable beginning may seem to be
contradictory to the fundamental concept that nothing in this world lasts forever. There is no
contradiction.
§ At any time, a given “life-stream” has a hadaya vatthu (seat of mind) and several pasāda rūpa
ranging from zero (in arūpāvacara realms or planes) to five (in kāma realms). Hadaya vatthu
and a set of pasāda rūpa are the “manomaya kāya” that every living being has. It is
unimaginably small (smaller than an atom in modern science). That manomaya kāya keeps
changing as the life-stream moves among the 31 realms.
§ The manomaya kāya is a “mental body.” But “body” here means a “collection,” the collection
of hadaya vatthu and a set of pasāda rūpa. One’s “mental body” weighs much less than a
mustard seed. In fact, at the moment of conception (“paṭisandhi viññāṇa descending to the
womb), our “physical body” consists only of a single cell (zygote), as we discussed in
“Clarification of “Mental Body” and “Physical Body” – Different Types of “Kāya”.”
§ In humans and animals, this manomaya kāya is the same as gandhabba. For brahmas,
manomaya kāya is all they have!
§ The “mental body” (gandhabba) is what controls the massive physical body of a human or an
animal.
A Worldview Based on Experience
6. The Buddhist worldview is not a theory or speculation. The Buddha could “see” each of the 31
realms of this world. He could “see” how a life-stream moves from one realm to another based on
kamma vipāka and prevailing conditions, i.e., Paticca Samuppāda.
§ Many suttas describe Buddha’s and his disciples’ visits to brahma and deva planes. Others
describe visits of brahmas and devas to the human world (mainly to listen to the discourses of
the Buddha and to ask questions from the Buddha).
§ For example, in the Vinaya Piṭaka, it is described that billions of devas and brahmas were there
to listen to the first discourse of the Buddha, Dhammacappavattana Sutta (SN 56.11). The
Brahmanimantanika Sutta (MN 49), describes how the Buddha visited the realm of the Mahā
Brahma to explain to him that his existence is not eternal; see, “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It
Really Means.”
§ One time, a brahmin came to the Buddha and asked whether the Buddha believes in the
existence of devas, brahmas, apāyās, etc. The Buddha told him that he “sees” them and
communicates with them. If someone remembers the name of that sutta, please let me know:
[email protected]. I will add that reference here.
§ August 28, 2019: Reader Siebe sent me the following reference: “WebLink: suttacentral:
Devadūta Sutta (MN 130)” that describes “hells” or “niraya.” A translation at: “WebLink:
accesstoinsight.org: Devaduta Sutta: The Deva Messengers.” A similar sutta about some realms
located close to Earth are described in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Āṭānāṭiya Sutta (DN 23).” A
translation there, “WebLink: suttacentral: The Āṭānāṭiya Discourse (DN 23).” Also, see my
post on August 28, 2019, at the discussion forum on, “WebLink: Pure Dhamma Forums:
Questions on Posts in the “Origin of Life” Subsection.” It discusses “life in hell.”
§ More information on hells at: “Does the Hell (Niraya) Exist?“. I revised and updated that post
on August 29, 2019.
7. The Buddha, more than 2500 years ago, also described the “physical world” consisting of billions
of galaxies with billions of stars in each galaxy (with different names of course).
§ On the other hand, even a few hundred years ago, modern science’s view of the universe was
that it included only the Solar system.
§ In the early 1600s, Galileo invented the telescope. He first saw that the Moon is similar to the
Earth in composition, that the stars are no different from our Sun. With more powerful
telescopes, we now know that there is an unbelievable number of stars (with planets around
them) out there.
8. However, the Buddha taught that studying the physical structure of the universe is not beneficial.
While it is an exciting subject, studying that would not solve the “problem of suffering.” We have
only a limited time in this life, and we must focus on the task of removing future suffering.
§ Regarding that aspect, one should focus on one’s inner world. In particular, on the issue of how
suffering-filled rebirths materialize due to one’s thoughts, speech, and actions. We do not need
telescopes or other fancy instruments for that. We can use our minds.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Dhamma and Science 521
§ By the way, by focusing on the mental phenomena, one can also find much more about the
physical world with billions of galaxies WITHOUT any scientific instrument. That is how the
Buddha knew more about the universe than modern scientists.
§ Therefore, the Buddhist worldview can provide a complete description of how our world. The
Buddha explained how an infinite number of “life-streams” takes different forms in a rebirth
process that has no beginning.
What is One’s World?
9. A given person’s world is what he/she experiences. What exactly do we experience?
§ We see forms with our eyes, hear sounds with ears, taste with tongues, smell with the nose,
body touches with physical bodies. Those are the five physical sense faculties and the five types
of “external entities” experienced by them. Modern science still thinks the mind is an
“emergent phenomenon” arising from the brain.
§ However, in Buddha Dhamma, the mind is much more critical than those five physical senses,
and we will see why.
10. With the mind, we remember past events, think about concepts like mathematics or Buddha
Dhamma, and plan for the future. That latter is the most crucial task by the mind. We think about,
plan, and initiate activities by generating saṅkhāra in mind.
§ Most such activities start due to ignorance (avijjā) about the real nature of this world. That is
why the akusala-mūla Paticca Samuppāda cycle begins with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra.” We
create good/bad kamma via saṅkhāra, which lead to defiled viññāṇa via “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa.”
§ When viññāṇa become strong enough, they can become paṭisandhi viññāṇa that fuel the rebirth
process. We will discuss this later. That is how the mind creates future existences in the
Buddhist worldview.
Translated: “What is
cakkhāyatana ? It is that cakkhu pasāda derived from the four great elements.
It is
invisible (anidassano) , makes contact (sappaṭighena) with visible (object).”
§ I have just translated the first part with an important fact: One cannot see the cakkhāyatana. It
is NOT the eyes. We will discuss in the next post how eyes act like cameras, just capturing the
signal from the object. The brain processes that signal, which then is passed on to the
cakkhāyatana.
§ In the same way, sotāyatana, ghānāyatana, jivhāyatana, kāyāyatana are all invisible. Those
five are the pasāda rūpa that I mentioned above. They are in the manomaya kāya, around the
hadaya vatthu (seat of mind). Also see, “Rūpa (Material Form).”
§ The hadaya vatthu and five pasāda rūpa are in the manomaya kāya overlap the heart in the
physical body. That is why the manomaya kāya comes out when the heart is stressed, like
during some heart operations; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE).”
Internal and External Āyatana
13. The six INTERNAL āyatana (cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, kāya, and mana) are responsible for
detecting sensory inputs.
§ They are all very fine rūpa (traces of matter) at the suddhaṭṭhaka level, i.e., they are the
smallest units of matter.
§ However, their ability to detect external rūpa comes from the kammic energy embedded in
them. Those kammic energies induce rotation and spin modes, i.e., those suddhaṭṭhaka start
turning and spinning just like electrons in an atom. That is why they called units of ten or
dasaka. For example, cakkhu rūpa is called a cakkhu dasaka. It has a suddhaṭṭhaka (eight units
of matter) and two units of energy (one in rotation and one in spin). See, “The Origin of Matter
– Suddhaṭṭhaka.”
§ Yes. The Buddha knew about rotation and spin before modern science. “Energy” can be in spin
(bramana in Pāli; bramana or බ්රමණ in Sinhala) and rotation (paribbramana in Pāli; bramana
or පරිබ්රමණ in Sinhala). See, “31 Realms Associated with the Earth“.
14. There are six types of EXTERNAL āyatana (vanna rūpa, sadda rūpa, gandha rūpa, rasa rūpa,
phoṭṭhabba rūpa, and dhamma rūpa or dhammā).
§ Most times, vanna rūpa are called rūpa rūpa or just rūpa. In the Chachakka Sutta, they are just
called rūpa. Those are the ones we see with our eyes. Many people assume that those are the
only rūpa. That is because they do not perceive sound as a form of rūpa, for example. But a
sound-wave carries energy.
§ Even modern science accepted that energy and matter are indistinguishable only after Einstein
found the connection between energy and matter with his famous equation, E = mc^2.
§ Gandha or smell is associated with fine particles of odor that flow through the air and get into
our noses. Rasa or taste comes from the food we eat. Phoṭṭhabba or touch is with solid matter.
So, those are also rūpa.
§ Yes. Some of dhamma rūpa or dhammā (sensed by the mind) are also rūpa. Dhammā are called
sukhuma rūpa because they are below the suddhaṭṭhaka stage. See, “What are Rūpa? –
Dhammā are Rūpa too!“. Also, the mind can detect memories (nama gotta) and concepts (like
mathematics) too.
15. We have discussed all types of matter (and energy) in our world within the Buddhist worldview.
In the next post, we will discuss how our mental experience (through vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and
viññāṇa) arise when internal āyatana come into contact with external āyatana.
5.2.6.4.
2
Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa
September 2, 2019
Introduction
1. Vipāka viññāṇa arise due to kamma vipāka. In the previous post, we introduced the concept that
our sensory experiences occur due to six internal rūpā and six external rūpā.
§ Those six types of internal types of rūpā are “internal āyatana.” In mundane terms, those are
our eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and the mind.
§ With those, we experience sights, sounds, smells, tastes, body touches, and dhammā (memories,
concepts, and our hopes). Those rūpā are external to us, and they are “external āyatana.”
§ You may wish to review the previous post, “Buddhist Worldview – Introduction.”
4. However, a plant CANNOT generate saṅkhārā (thoughts) about those vedanā and saññā. One may
ask: “Then how does a plant turn towards sunlight?.”
§ Plants are like robots. A moving robot may have sensors that can detect obstacles in the way.
That involves vedanā and saññā in the elementary sense.
§ That robot may also have a computer in it which can instruct how to go around an obstacle, for
example.
§ The working of a plant is very similar. A plant seed has necessary “programs” installed in its
cells to deal with the external environment. We discussed this a little bit in my posts on “living
cells.” See, the old posts in “Origin of Life.”
§ Therefore, some “live things” like plants can generate vedanā and saññā, but they CANNOT
create saṅkhārā and viññāṇa. We remember that saṅkhārā and viññāṇa arise via, “avijjā
paccayā saṅkhārā” and “saṅkhārā paccayā viññāṇa.”
8. Therefore, vipāka viññāṇa DO NOT arise due to Paṭicca Samuppāda. They occur when our sense
faculties come to contact with external rūpā, as described in #7 above. Those rupā can be six types:
vanna rūpā, sadda, gandha, rasa, phoṭṭhabba, and dhammā.
§ The contact of an internal āyatana with an external āyatana leads to the “awareness” of that
external rūpā.
§ Therefore, vipāka viññāṇa could be the closest to the English word, “consciousness.” Even
then, there are some mano saṅkhārā that arise with a vipāka viññāṇa. Therefore, it is better not
to refer to even vipāka viññāṇa as just consciousness.
§ That is why the Buddha described viññāṇa as a magician. But this “magic show nature” is
easier to see with kamma viññāṇa that we discuss below. The mind on its own creates kamma
viññāṇa.
9. When we become conscious of an external āyatana (or an external rūpā), we may get interested in
it. (We need to remember that external rūpā include visible objects, sounds, smells, tastes, bodily
touches, or memories),
§ That is when we start generating NEW KAMMA. That will happen IF we get attached to that
sensory experience via greed or anger, for example.
§ Those CONSCIOUS thoughts (called saṅkhārā) lead to a new type of mano viññāṇa. Those
viññāṇa arise via “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” followed by “saṅkhārā paccayā viññāṇa.” Such
viññāṇa are kamma viññāṇa.
§ Such kamma viññāṇa MAY arise as the next step following the generation of any of the six
types of vipāka viññāṇa. That happens ONLY IF we get attached to the initial vipāka
viññāṇa.
§ Then based on that determination, seven javana cittā run consecutively. It is with javana cittā
that we respond (think, speak, and act).
§ That is a very brief summary. More details at “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs.”
Kamma Viññāṇa Are Those That Arise Due to Saṅkhāra
12. Suppose one sees an appealing object and gets attached to it. One may then start thinking,
speaking, and even taking action on trying to enjoy that sight again and again. That leads to the
generation of kamma via mano viññāṇa (generated via vacī and kāya saṅkhārā.)
§ The same happens if one gets annoyed or angry about what one saw. Then one would be
generating angry thoughts, speech, action. Those are also mano viññāṇa. Such mano viññāṇa
are “kamma viññāṇa.”
§ Of course, both those cases arise due to avijjā. We get attached to a given sensory input
because we get attracted to it or repulsed by it (both are done with taṇhā; see below). Both
happen due to avijjā, not knowing the “true nature.” One comprehends the true nature when
one attains “yathābhūta ñāṇa.”
13. We can sort out the difference by seeing that all kamma viññāṇa have saṅkhārā as
precursors. They arise when we think, speak, act based on greed, anger, and ignorance. I will explain
just the case of attachment (taṇhā) via greed.
§ For example, when we first see something attractive, we AUTOMATICALLY get the
perception of “liking it.” Those INITIAL and AUTOMATIC thoughts are mano saṅkhārā.
These arise due to our gati.
§ If we start pursuing such thoughts CONSCIOUSLY AND WILLFULLY, then we are
generating vitakka and vicāra (which means consciously thinking about it). Those are vacī
saṅkhārā. We may also speak out with such vitakka/vicāra, and vacī saṅkhārā are also
responsible for speech.
§ If our mind gets firmly attached, we may take actions using the body. Those bodily actions are
due to kāya saṅkhārā generated in mind.
14. Now, we can see the difference between vipāka viññāṇa and kamma viññāṇa. Vipāka viññāṇa do
not have saṅkhārā involved.
§ On the other hand, kamma viññāṇa ALWAYS arise due to saṅkhārā generated via avijjā.
Those are the viññāṇa that can lead to future vipāka (and even rebirth) via akusala-mūla
Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ In other words, kamma viññāṇa are the viññāṇa arising via “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” followed
by “saṅkhārā paccayā viññāṇa.”
§ That process continues with “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa,” etc. and ends up in “bhava paccayā
jāti, “jāti paccayā jarā, maraṇa,” and “the whole mass of suffering.”
§ That is why those created with saṅkhārā are kamma viññāṇa.
Summary
15. To summarize what we discussed in this post:
§ Cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, and kāya viññāṇa are ONLY vipāka viññāṇa. They cannot lead
to new rebirths.
§ Kamma viññāṇa are those viññāṇa that COULD lead to future rebirths.
§ Mano viññāṇa can be “vipāka viññāṇa” or “kamma viññāṇa.”
16. We will discuss more details in the next post. I am proceeding slowly to emphasize these
fundamental ideas. It is crucial to be able to understand what is MEANT by a given critical key Pāli
word. Then we can use that Pāli word, without having to explain its meaning again.
§ I hope by now you can appreciate why it is not correct to translate viññāṇa as just
“consciousness’.
§ In the same way, taṇhā is NOT just greed. Taṇhā includes getting attached via anger too; see,
“Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance.” Also, see #12 above.
§ There are several keywords like that, including anicca and anatta.
§ It is critical to understand the meanings of such key Pāli words since there are no equivalent
English words.
All posts on this general topic at “Origin of Life.” Please direct any questions on the above post to the
discussion forum at “Questions on Posts in the “Origin of Life” Subsection“. If not registered at the
forum, send questions to my email address, [email protected].
5.2.6.4.
3
How Do Sense Faculties Become Internal Āyatana?
September 8, 2019
Introduction
1. Sense faculties are a key concept in Buddha Dhamma. In mundane usage, we are used to
identifying sense faculties as eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body.
§ However, in Buddha Dhamma, there are two different Pāli words depending on the usage of
those sense faculties.
§ The sense faculties of a normal human are “internal āyatana.” With those, an average person
experiences the outside world AND forms attachments to them.
§ Then those external rūpā become “external āyatana” (for example, “my house”, “my friend”,
etc); see, “Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa.” Therefore, external āyatana
are the external rūpā that one gets attached to.
2. An Arahant has removed all greed, anger, and ignorance from the mind. The sense faculties of an
Arahant are indriya. With his sensory faculties, an Arahant experiences “external rūpā” such as “a
house”, “a person”, etc. without any attachment. That house may be an elegant house where he lived
some time back. But now it is just a house. That person could have been a “close friend” at that time,
but now just another human being. Of course, the Arahant will recognize the house to be the one he
lived in as a child and that the person was his friend.
§ In brief, a sense faculty is an indriya if there is no “attachment”. It becomes an internal
āyatanaif one is attracted to it or repulsed by it. In the same way, an external rūpa
becomes an external āyatana if one becomes attached to it.
§ The Pāli word for attachment is “taṇhā.” It is critical to realize that one can get attached via
greed, anger, revulsion, or ignorance. When one gets attached, one just keeps thinking about it
(i.e., start generating saṅkhāra; see below). Also, see “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed,
Hate, and Ignorance.”
How Do Indriya Become Internal Āyatana?
3. First, let us further clarify the difference between an internal āyatana and an indriya.
§ We have six sense faculties, not just the five mentioned above. They are eyes (cakkhu), ears
(sōta), nose (ghāṇa), tongue (jivhā), body (kāya), and the mind (mano).
§ Our initial sense inputs (what we see, hear, etc) are due to kamma vipāka. At the moment we
experience them, we are using our sense faculties as indriya. For example, when we see an
attractive person while on the road, that is just “seeing the event” with the cakkhu indriya.
§ However, based on those initial sense experience, we may INTENTIONALLY use those
indriya to enjoy that sensory experience again and again. Then those indriya become āyatana.
In the above example, if we get attached to that attractive person and keep looking at that
person, then we are using our eyes as cakkhāyatana (cakkhu āyatana rhymes as cakkhāyatana.)
§ Therefore, an initial sensory event is captured by an indriya. But just after receiving that
sensory input, we tend to use that sense faculty as an internal āyatana. That happens if we get
attached or form “taṇhā“; see #2 above.
§ There is no equivalent English word for āyatana, so we will keep using indriya and āyatana
from now on.
4. Let us take the example of two people eating a delicious cake. Here the sense faculty is taste
(jivhā). Let us say X is an average human and Y is an Arahant.
§ Both X and Y will generate the same kind of jivhā viññāṇa when they first taste it. That is just
the taste of the cake. If the sensory elements in the tongue and the brain are working normally,
both will be likely to find that cake “tasty”. That “good taste” is a kamma vipāka. (By the way,
there is an infinite number of kamma vipāka waiting to bear fruit, including such a “small
vipāka” as tasting a piece of cake.)
§ The difference becomes apparent just after tasting the cake. The Arahant (Y) would forget all
about that taste, even though he/she would have felt the “good taste.” It was just a sensory
experience and thus Y was using that sense faculty as an indriya.
§ On the other hand, X may “fall in love” with that tasty cake. She may ask for another serving.
Now she is using that sense faculty as an āyatana. She will be accumulating NEW kamma
with such actions.
How One Indriya Can Lead to Many Āyatana (Saḷāyatana)
5. In many cases, when we experience a sensory event due to one indriya, we may start using some or
all of the six indriya as āyatana. Then the set of indriya becomes saḷāyatana.
§ In the above example of a tasty cake (which is a kamma vipāka for both X and Y), they both
experience “a tasty cake”. While Y will not have any more thoughts about that taste, X may be
just getting started. She may ask for another piece even if she is not hungry.
§ Let us analyze the situation carefully. The Arahant (Y) may ask for a second piece if he is
hungry. That request was not made because of a greedy thought. Thus, the tongue (or more
precisely the jivhā pasāda) has NOT become an āyatana.
§ If X asks for another piece even if she is not hungry, that is definitely due to craving for that
taste. Then her tongue has become an āyatana. If she is hungry, her request could be based on
BOTH hunger and craving. So, now her tongue (more precisely jivhā pasāda) is still an
āyatana, but the difference is not as clear cut.
6. Whether or not X’s jivhā pasāda rūpā (internal indriya for tasting) has truly become an āyatana or
not may become more clear if she takes further action.
§ She may smell it and say, “it smells good too”. She may keep saying how good the taste is, and
ask for the recipe or inquire about where to buy one.
§ Now many of her sense faculties have become āyatana. Ghana pasāda rūpā (for smelling) has
now become ghānāyatana (ghāṇa + āyatana).
§ She is thinking about how to go about tasting that cake again. Therefore, the mind (mana) has
become manāyatana (mana + āyatana).
§ If she starts writing down the recipe, her body (kāya) is helping out too, acting as a kāyāyatana
(kāya + āyatana).
§ Therefore, when more than one āyatana become engaged, the set of āyatana (called
saḷāyatana), may come into play. But it all started with just one sensory input, in this case
eating a piece of cake.
Indriya Become Āyatana With Saṅkhāra
7. The easiest way to figure out whether an indriya has become an āyatana or not is to check whether
one has started generating CONSCIOUS thoughts about that sensory input or experience.
§ One could get interested in a sensory input if one gets attached to it via greed, revulsion, or
ignorance.
§ If one smells good perfume, one may start thinking about buying it for oneself. If one sees an
enemy coming his way, one may generate angry thoughts and look another way. In some
situations, one may get confused about what to do and make the wrong decisions.
§ Such CONSCIOUS thoughts are vacī and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ With vacī saṅkhāra one “talks to oneself” and also may speak out. Here one may just generate
greedy/angry/ignorant thoughts, or may also speak out (lying, gossiping, etc).
§ With kāya saṅkhāra, one takes bodily actions, for example, hitting, stealing, killings, etc. Here
one would be using saḷāyatana since one would need to look and hear in addition to moving
body parts.
8. Most of the time we use our sense faculties as indriya: we see, hear, etc many things in a day but
ignore most of them. But when we experience something we have a craving for, then we start using
our sense faculties as āyatana.
§ The akusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda cycle operates only when we use our sense faculties as
āyatana.
§ Those saṅkhāra do not arise in an Arahant. That is because such saṅkhāra arise due to avijjā,
i.e., they arise via “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”.
§ An Arahant ALWAYS uses his/her sense faculties as indriya. He/she will see, hear, etc just like
us, but will not get “attached to” anything. Therefore, the akusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda
cycle does not operate for an Arahant.
Abhisaṅkhāra Are Stronger Versions of Saṅkhāra
9. Some of those “extra activities” that we do with āyatana could be abhisaṅkhāra. Just eating a cake
is not abhisaṅkhāra; see, “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha.”
§ The distinction between saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra is clear-cut when those conscious thoughts
(and therefore speech and actions) become immoral.
§ Generating thoughts of anger on a person is abhisaṅkhāra. Then telling a lie about that person
is also abhisaṅkhāra. Both are vacī kamma done with vacī (abhi)saṅkhāra.
§ Stealing something or hitting someone is a kāya kamma done with kāya (abhi)saṅkhāra.
§ Therefore, obviously immoral thoughts, speech, and actions are based on abhisaṅkhāra. They
are apuññābhisaṅkhāra (apuñña + abhi + saṅkhāra) or immoral strong saṅkhāra.
10. We can get some insights by analyzing the case of a young person (Z) becoming an alcoholic due
to association with bad friends. As a child, Z may see a bottle of alcohol and would not generate any
second thoughts about it. It would just be a “seeing event’ and Z would be only using his eyes (or
more precisely cakkhu pasāda rūpā) as cakkhu indriya.
§ But Z had some bad friends and they persuaded him to start drinking. He has now become an
alcoholic. If he sees a bottle of alcohol now, he would immediately think about having a drink.
Of course, he would have a drink If he is at a party. If he is at home, and the bottle belongs to
his father, he may steal a drink from it. If he is traveling by himself and sees a bar, he may go in
and have a drink.
§ It could get even worse. He may be drinking at a party and may get into an argument with
someone. Suppose that leads to a fight and he kills that person. He may get the death sentence
or at least go to jail for a long time. But a much worse outcome awaits him at his death. He
would be born in an apāya.
§ I hope you can see that vacī and kāya saṅkhāra are behind all those. In fact, they are strong
saṅkhāra. They are thus abhisaṅkhāra. If he kills someone, that is due to an
apuññābhisaṅkhāra. That would qualify him to be born in an apāya.
11. There are also puññābhisaṅkhāra (puñña + abhi + saṅkhāra) or moral strong saṅkhāra.
§ For example, feeding a hungry person or giving to charity are kāya kamma done with strong
kāya saṅkhāra. They are both puññābhisaṅkhāra.
§ Such strong puñña kamma done with puññābhisaṅkhāra lead to good rebirths (in human and
higher realms).
How Do External Rūpā Become External Āyatana?
12. The moment an indriya becomes an internal āyatana, the corresponding external rūpā becomes
an external āyatana.
§ Let us consider the following example. You are walking down a street and see a person coming
toward you at a distance. Without recognizing who it is, your eyes are working only as indriya.
But as the person gets closer, you recognize him as one of your friends. At that moment, your
cakkhu indriya has become a cakkhāyatana. At the same time, that external rūpā of a “person”
has now become a “friend”.
§ To take that one step further, suppose after some time you get into an argument with that friend
and it escalates to the point that he has become an enemy. Now if you see him on the road, you
will recognize him as an enemy. At that moment of seeing him, your cakkhu indriya will again
become an internal āyatana, and his body that you see will become an external āyatana.
§ However, those two external āyatana are very different. In one case you saw a friend and in the
other an enemy, even though that external rūpā (body of that other person) was the same.
13. We can find many examples in our daily lives to see how our an indriya becomes āyatana. In
another example, suppose you park the car on the side of the road and go to a restaurant to eat. When
you come back, you see that someone has bumped his car into it and there is a scratch on it. You, of
course, get upset.
§ Suppose after a while you sell that car. Then a few days later, you see that it has been totally
destroyed in an accident. But now you are not upset about the same car getting destroyed.
When you see that badly-damaged car, your cakkhu indriya does not become an internal
āyatana. And that external rūpa (the car) does not become an external āyatana.
§ The only difference was that you had given up the attachment to that car the moment you sold
it. It is no longer “your car”. It became just another car, the moment you gave up the
“ownership” of the car.
How to Stop Indriya Becoming Āyatana?
14. That last example illustrates how one ends suffering at the Arahanthood. When on longer attaches
to ANYTHING in this world, one’s mind will not be perturbed by anything. That includes knowing
that one day one’s own body will die.
§ An indriya makes “just contact” or “phassa.” When sensory contacts are done “with
attachment or taṇhā,” those indriya That is the crucial concept
become internal āyatana.
explained in the previous post, “How Do Sense Faculties Become Internal Āyatana?.”
§ You may want to re-read the above posts if something is not clear. Of course, I would be happy
to answer any questions.
The Transition from Just a Sensory Contact to Kamma Formation
3. Even for an average human, the INITIAL CONTACT between an internal āyatana and an external
āyatana does not lead to the generation of strong kamma. For example, only when we see a beautiful
thing or a person (called rūpa rūpa or just rūpa), that we become aware of that rūpa. (There are mano
saṅkhāra that arise automatically, but they cannot lead to strong kamma responsible for rebirth. We
will discuss that later.)
§ However, for anyone who has not reached the Arahant stage, sense faculties are labeled as
“internal āyatana,” and external rūpa are labeled “external āyatana.” That is evident in the
Chachakka Sutta (MN 148).
§ Only an Arahant uses his/her sense faculties as indriya all the time.
4. In the Chachakka Sutta (MN 148), that initial contact — for example between cakkhāyatana
(cakkhu) and rūpāyatana (rūpa) — is stated as “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhu
viññāṇaṃ.” Similar statements are there for other five pairs, the last one being “manañca paṭicca
dhamme ca uppajjati mano viññāṇaṃ.”
§ We will focus on the progression of what happens due to the contact between cakkhu and rūpa
(eyes and an external object in mundane terms.) Other types of contacts will lead to similar
results.
§ The “kamma formation” step in the sutta starts with the next paragraph in the sutta. Regarding
the contact between cakkhu and rūpa, it says, “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhu
viññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso.” (Note that each successive paragraph of the sutta adds the
next step that the mind takes.)
What is “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso”?
5. The phrase “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso” is commonly mistranslated as “the meeting of the three is
contact.” What are those three? Are they cakkhu, rūpa, and cakkhuviññāṇa? That is not right, because
the “contact” (phasso) leads to “phassa paccayā vedanā” as we will discuss below. This “phassa
paccayā vedanā” arises AFTER cakkhu viññāṇa.
§ That short verse is a KEY verse in the whole sutta. It expresses how an indriya becomes
āyatana due to one’s gati. Those are the gati for attachment (taṇhā) via craving or dislike.
§ “Tiṇṇaṃ” is three and “saṅgati” (“san” + “gati“) are “gati contaminated with san“. Normal
humans have gati based on three fundamental root causes: lobha (greed), dosa (anger/hate), and
moha (no comprehension of the Four Noble Truths). That is why “san” is a keyword in Buddha
Dhamma; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Samsāra).” [saṅgati :[f.] association
with. gati :[f.] going; career; course; passing on to another existence; destiny; behaviour.]
§ Just like the word “san,” another critical Pāli word that has lost its significance over the years
is “gati.” I have explained this word in detail in many posts. See, for example, “The Law of
Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)” and “9. Key to Anapanasati –
How to Change Habits and Character (Gati).”
Phassa in “Tiṇṇaṃ Saṅgati Phasso” Is Samphassa
6. Therefore, following that initial sensory contact, one MAY form a like/dislike for the seen, heard,
smelled, tasted, touched, or memory that came to mind (dhammā). But it happens within a fraction of
a second of the initial cakkhu viññāṇa.
§ For example, a young lady looking at a dress may form a liking for it. Another person seeing
his enemy will develop a dislike. A teenager may get attached to a particular song, etc.
§ Such mental contacts — with likes/dislikes or “san” — happen instantaneously, due to our
“gati.“ We do not have any control over it.
§ However, since our actions based on that initial reaction take some time, we still have time to
control our speech or bodily actions. Even if bad thoughts come to our minds, we can stop any
speech or bodily actions. That is what is we do in “kāyānupassanā” in Satipaṭṭhāna meditation.
§ Those contacts (phassa) done with “san” are samphassa. Here, “san” + “phassa” combine to
rhyme as “sanphassa.” But “samphassa” rhymes better. In the same way, “sansāra” (“san”
+ “sāra” or “good”) is commonly pronounced — and written — as “samsāra“.
No Samphassa for an Arahant
7. An Arahant has no “gati” left. All defiled “gati” arise due to lobha, dosa, moha. Therefore, an
Arahant does not attach (taṇhā) to any sensory event. In other words, “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso” does
not take place in an Arahant’s mind. Also, note that attachment (taṇhā) can be due to attraction
(liking) or aversion (dislike). See, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance.”
§ That is why an Arahant will never elevate his indriya to “internal āyatana.” Therefore, any
external rūpa sensed by a given indriya will be “just a rūpa.” No matter how attractive a person
is or how tasty a given food, etc. there will be no attachment to it. A bribe of any value will not
be able to entice an Arahant.
§ In the same way, even if someone cuts his/her arm off, there will be no anger generated in an
Arahant‘s mind.
§ Such a mindset is incomprehensible to an average human. That is WHY one should not even
contemplate that far on the Path. When one is on a long journey on foot, one needs to focus
on the next mile, not the final stretch hundreds of miles down the road. However, it is good to
have a general idea about the whole terrain.
8. The state of mind of an Arahant could seem “hard-to-achieve” even to an Anāgāmi, even though it
may no longer seem incomprehensible.
§ For a Sotāpanna, the mindset of an Anāgāmi seems “out-of-reach.” As we know, one gets to the
Anāgāmi stage by getting rid of cravings for sensory pleasures. It is not easy to remove our
deeply-embedded desires for sensory pleasures. For an average human, this would be
impossible. But a Sotāpanna has seen the “anicca nature”.
§ However, once getting to the Sotāpanna stage, one will not be tempted to do immoral actions to
enjoy sensory pleasures. Even though one could be living a normal life of a “householder,” one
will NEVER engage in any “apāyagāmi actions.” Those are immoral deeds that would make
one eligible to be born in the apāyās, such as having extra-marital affairs.
“Phassa Paccayā Vedanā” Is Actually “Samphassa jā Vedanā”
9. Now we get to the next verse in the Chachakka Sutta (MN 148): “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca
uppajjati cakkhu viññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā.”
§ (I hope you see the way the sutta makes gradual progression. “Phassa paccayā vedanā” is the
third step in the progress of the sensory experience. But all these steps — including more steps
in the rest of sutta — happen within a split second. Only a Buddha can “see” these details in
this fast process that occurs in mind.)
§ From the above discussion, it is clear that “phassa paccayā vedanā” should be “samphassa
paccayā vedanā.” In some suttas, it is written as “samphassa jā vedanā.” Here “jā” means
“born due to.” In other words, it is a vedanā that arises due to “samphassa.”
§ Therefore, this is the SECOND TYPE of vedanā that can arise due to a sensory event. That
CAN BE stopped from arsing. That type of vedanā does not occur in an Arahant.
The difference in Sensory Experience Between an Average Human and
an Arahant
10. Therefore, “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso” and “phassa paccayā vedanā” are two critical steps in the
progression of the sensory experience.
§ Those two steps state how anyone without full comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha,
anatta nature) COULD generate additional types of vedanā.
§ Now we need to recall something important from the earlier posts, “Contact Between Āyatana
Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa” and “How Do Sense Faculties Become Internal Āyatana?.” In those
two posts, we discussed the initial sensory contact, for example, “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca
uppajjati cakkhu viññāṇaṃ.” That gave rise to a vedanā that was common to both an average
human and an Arahant.
§ As we discussed in the previous post, both an average human and an Arahant would feel a
piece of cake to be tasty. You may want to go back and read those two posts to refresh memory.
§ Now it is those two steps of “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso” and “phassa paccayā vedanā” that
COULD generate ADDITIONAL vedanā of attachment (to the cake in that example) in an
average human. Such vedanā DO NOT arise in an Arahant.
Summary
11. I am taking the two extreme cases of an average human and an Arahant to explain the key
concepts in the Chachakka Sutta (MN 148). In many key suttas, key ideas are just briefly stated, i.e.,
they are in either “uddesa” or “niddesa” versions. See “Sutta – Introduction.”
§ I hope you can see that key suttas like the Chachakka Sutta (MN 148) need detailed
explanations. That is the “paṭiniddesa” version of a sutta.
§ That is why it is of minimal benefit to translate such a sutta word-by-word. There is no need to
study many suttas. If one can truly understand a few suttas in detail, one can understand the
core teachings of the Buddha.
§ Therefore, it is essential to understand these fundamental ideas. If something is not clear, I
would be happy to explain further.
12. We will discuss the types of vedanā that can arise due to “phassa paccayā vedanā” or more
accurately, “samphassa jā vedanā” in the next post.
An Aside (Extra Information)
13. The steps we have discussed so far, “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhu viññāṇaṃ,
tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā” are just a part of the more general statement,
“saḷāyatana paccayā phasso; phassapaccayā vedanā,..” in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ In the WebLink: suttacentral: Vibhaṅga Sutta (SN 12.2), the terms “phassa” and “vedanā” are
clarified as “samphassa” and “samphassa jā vedanā.” That applies only in the case of average
human acting with avijjā (i.e., in Paṭicca Samuppāda and for the Chachakka Sutta (MN 148).
§ “Phassa” in Paṭicca Samuppāda is explained in the Vibhaṅga Sutta (SN 12.2): “Katamo ca,
bhikkhave, phasso? Chayime, bhikkhave, phassakāyā—cakkhusamphasso, sotasamphasso,
Introduction
1. We have been discussing the first few verses of the “WebLink: suttacentral: Chachakka Sutta (MN
148)”. Before we proceed further in the sutta, it is a good idea to take a break and look at what we
have learned from a different point-of-view.
§ The Buddha called himself a “vibhajjavādi“. That means he explained things in great detail by
diving and subdividing a given entity or concept to examine it at more fundamental levels.
§ That is very much like what the scientists are doing today. They first explained the matter in
terms of molecules, and then with atoms. Later, they found that an atom consists of a nucleus
and electrons in orbitals around it. Then they probed the nucleus and discovered that more
fundamental particles (with names like gluons, and quarks) make up the nucleus.
§ By probing deeper, physicists also came up with Quantum Mechanics. Matter and energy are
“quantized” on a small scale. That just means they come in “packets” or “quantā” (the singular
is “quantum”.)
§ More than 2500 years ago, the Buddha taught that matter and energy are quantized. The
smallest “quantum” in Buddha Dhamma is a suddhātthaka. But that is not relevant to the
present discussion.
Sensory Experience is Quantized – It comes in “Packets”
2. I am not going to have a discussion on Quantum mechanics. But I want to look at the “Chachakka
Sutta (MN 148)” from a little bit different point-of-view. That will break the tradition of providing
boring translations of suttas, and I hope will also provide better insights into the material in the sutta.
I thought this discussion would be beneficial before we move to the next section of the sutta.
§ As you will see below, scientists are just beginning to take the mental phenomena seriously.
They have made a bit of progress. But they are not even close to having a detailed analysis of
mental phenomena that the Buddha did over 2500 years ago.
§ Mental energy is also quantized, even though we may feel like thoughts are continuous. The
smallest unit in Buddha Dhamma is a “citta“. A citta lasts less than a billionth of a second. We
cannot experience a single citta. Even though it is conventionally translated as “a thought”,
that is not correct.
§ What we usually think of as a “thought” consists of billions of cittā (The plural of citta is cittā,
but sometimes I tend to write that as cittas just because that is easier for most people.) By the
way, citta is pronounced “chiththa.”
What is a Thought?
3. Let us first see the progress that science has made over the past 50 years or so. Science is still at a
very early stage regarding the mind. But they have made some progress recently and we will show
them to be fully consistent with Buddha Dhamma. In fact, those findings help explain deeper
concepts in Buddha Dhamma.
§ Only fifty years ago, scientists thought that computers can “become conscious” just by
increasing the processing speeds. Now there are computers that are much faster, but they, of
course, do not have consciousness. We will discuss later why computers will never become
conscious.
§ The following is a presentation entitled, “What is a Thought?” by Henning Beck, a scientist
studying brain phenomena.
WebLink: youtube: What is a Thought? How the Brain Creates New Ideas | Henning Beck |
TEDxHHL
A Computer Does Not Have Perception (Saññā)
4. At 4:00 minutes, we see a “face” made up of fruits and vegetables. Even though it is not a real
human face, it takes us just a split second to realize that it represents a face.
§ But as Mr. Beck points out, a computer will never be able to recognize the representation of the
human face depicted there.
§ At 9:20 minutes he starts a discussion on the identification of a chair. Again, a computer runs
into a problem identifying “less obvious” structures that can serve as chairs.
§ In both these instances, what the computer is missing is saññā (loosely translated to English as
“perception”). Even animals can recognize objects relevant to their survival. A dog, for
example, can instantly recognize its owners and any other pets living in the house. It can
recognize foods that it likes, etc. See “Saññā – What It Really Means.”
Vedanā, Saññā, Joy, Sadness, etc. Cannot Arise in a Brain
5. Around 6:00 minutes, Mr. Beck starts talking about human thought. All he (and other scientists)
know right now is that our thoughts rise very fast. But they do not have any explanation of how
thoughts with feelings (vedanā), perception (saññā), joy, etc. can arise out of a brain made of inert
atoms and molecules.
§ A brain is not that different from a computer, in the sense that atoms and molecules are the
building blocks of both. Both can process information. But a brain processes information in a
very different way compared to a computer. It involves billions of neurons working as a team.
Scientists are not even close to figuring out how the brain processes information.
§ In the future, scientists may be able able to figure out how those neurons are able to process
information much faster than a computer with a thousand-times higher processing speeds.
§ However, they will still NOT be able to able to figure out how a human or animal can recognize
their surroundings AND generates emotions (happy, sad, etc.)
§ Around 11:00 minutes he discusses the difference between learning and understanding. That is
an excellent point.
Vedanā, Saññā, Joy, Sadness, etc. Arise in the “Mental Body”
6. A brain cannot generate a thought. How can feelings and emotions come out of an entity made of
inert atoms and molecules?
§ There has to be a LIVING BEING to generate a citta, the basic unit of consciousness. For a
human being, the essence of that LIVING ENTITY is not the physical body, but the mental
body.
§ That “mental body” is alternatively called a manomaya kāya or gandhabba. It consists of a
hadaya vatthu (seat of mind) and five pasāda rūpa located around it (for seeing, listening,
smelling, tasting, and touching.) The mental body is not like the “physical body”. It is more like
an “energy body” that gives life to the inert and dense physical body.
§ A manomaya kāya may be visualized as an “energy field” within the physical body with the
hadaya vatthu and five pasāda rūpa overlapping the region of the physical heart.
7. Our brains do not have the capability to identify objects. It cannot generate emotions like joy and
sadness. As we discussed in #4 above, even animals can identify things and generate feelings and
emotions.
§ It is the mental body (manomaya kāya or gandhabba) that generates such mental phenomena
like vedanā, saññā, and related emotions like joy and sadness.
§ More precisely, those mental phenomena arise in the hadaya vatthu (seat of mind) of the
gandhabba.
8. The details are not critical, but that basic mechanism is important to understand. A brain does not
see, hear, smell, taste, or touch. It is the seat of the mind (hadaya vatthu) that experiences all those.
§ That is why a human body is just a shell that supports the mental body (manomaya kāya or the
gandhabba). At the death of the physical body, that manomaya kāya leaves the body instantly.
If you touch a dead body, it will be obvious to you that there is no “life” there.
§ A live body is like a “live wire” with an electric current flowing through. One will get an
“electrical shock” by touching it. But if there is no electric current, it is just a metal wire.
§ In the same way, it is the manomaya kāya that gives “life’ to an inert physical body.
§ We will discuss this more in the next post. First, let us look into the mechanism of citta
generation.
A Citta Has Vedanā, Saññā, and Many Other “Built-In” Mental Factors
11. A citta is the fundamental unit of cognition, which we do not feel by itself. It comes in bunches of
12 or more cittā. Those “bunches” or series of cittā are citta vīthi. What we “feel” or “experience” is
a vast number of such citta vīthi.
§ Any citta vīthi that arises due to sensory input from one of the five physical senses has 17 cittā.
It is a pañcadvāra citta vīthi.
§ On the other hand, a citta vīthi arising directly in the mind (due to dhammā) may have varying
numbers of cittā, with a minimum of 12 cittā. That is a manodvāra citta vīthi.
12. What we usually call a “thought” is the cumulative effect of billions of such citta vīthi that arise
PER SECOND.
§ Each of those cittā has at least seven mental factors (cetasikā). Those universal cetasikā include
vedanā and saññā. Vedanā cetasika makes one FEEL a sensory input. The saññā cetasika is the
one which recognizes that sensory input.
§ Only a living being can generate that fundamental unit of cognition (citta) within a
billionth of a second, with built-in seven or more cetasikā.
§ That is why a computer or a robot will NEVER become conscious. Only Kammic energy can
create a manomaya kāya with the seat of the mind (hadaya vatthu).
We are discussing the “Worldview of the Buddha.” It may be a good idea to print out the posts in
there for referral while reading subsequent posts. It is CRITICAL to understand the material
discussed so far to follow future posts.
All Our Activities Start With a Sensory Trigger
1. We know that we are alive because we are aware of the external world. We can see an object, hear
a sound, smell an odor, taste food, and feel the touch of something or someone. Furthermore, we can
recall past events (part of dhammā).
§ All our sensory experiences start with a “trigger event” that comes through one of our six sense
faculties. If we see, hear, smell, taste, touch something that grabs our attention, then we start
thinking, speaking, and taking action on that particular sight, sound, odor, taste, and touch.
§ Also, a thought about a past event or a planned event (dhammā) may come to our mind, and we
could get started that way too.
2. We usually go through our daily routines based on what we do regularly. One gets up in the
morning and gets ready for work (school) on a working day. Those ” to do tasks” come to one’s mind
automatically as dhammā.
§ Such a “planned or routine day of work” could be disrupted by an unexpected event. One may
get a phone call from the boss asking to go to a meeting at a different location. One may see
that his/her child is not well and may need to take the child to a hospital. Again, a sensory
trigger is there.
§ One may also set up an alarm to get up at a particular time. When the alarm goes off in the
morning, one gets up and recalls that one has to get ready for a specific task.
§ It is a good idea to think about what one goes through a day. We can see that all activities start
with “sensory triggers.”
A Sensory Trigger is an “Ārammaṇa”
3. Each activity starts with a “trigger,” which is a sensory event. That is an “ārammaṇa” in Pāli.
One consciously “sees an object” when one’s mind takes that object as the “ārammaṇa” or the ” mind
focus.” That becomes a “new ārammaṇa,” where one will take more actions.
§ For example, short interaction with a person may trigger an interest in that person. Then that
may lead to further contacts.
§ We get exposed to many sensory inputs as we go through the day. But only specific sensory
inputs catch our attention and make us think about them. A strong sensory input that gets our
attention is an ārammaṇa.
§ If X is listening to the television in the background while eating, X’s focus is on the meal.
However, if X hears on the TV that terrorist attack just took place in a major city, X’s attention
would focus on that news story. X may stop eating and go and watch the television to get more
information. That is a new ārammaṇa.
4. There is always an “ārammaṇa” to initiate an action, and there are only six types of ārammaṇa
per “Chachakka Sutta (MN 148).”Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ, sotañca
paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ, ghānañca paṭicca gandhe ca uppajjati ghānaviññāṇaṃ,
jivhāñca paṭicca rase ca uppajjati jivhāviññāṇaṃ, kāyañca paṭicca phoṭṭhabbe ca uppajjati
kāyaviññāṇaṃ, manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ.”
§ For example, the second on the list says that “ear-consciousness (sota viññāṇa) happens when
ears (more precisely sota pasāda) come to contact with a sound (sadda).” In the above
example, X heard about a terrorist attack.
§ That sensory event could then start a whole series of new actions. In the example of #3 above,
X stopped eating and went to the television to watch it.
§ You should think about this basic idea of how a sensory event (seeing, hearing, etc. leads to a
whole set of actions during a given day. This idea was first introduced in the post, “Contact
Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa.”
Two Different Meanings of Paṭicca
5. We translated the verse, “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ” as “..cakkhu
viññāṇa arises when a rūpa makes contact (paṭicca) with cakkhu pasāda rūpā.” See, #7 of “Contact
Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa.” That was further elaborated in the next post, “Indriya
Make Phassa and Āyatana Make Samphassa.”
§ Some other English translations state that as, “dependent on the eye and forms, eye-
consciousness arises.” They translate paṭicca as “dependent on” presumably because Paticca
Samuppāda is translated as “Dependent Origination.”
§ But paṭicca is a Pāli word that has somewhat different meanings depending on the context. Let
us clarify that first.
6. It is fine to translate Paticca Samuppāda as “Dependent Origination.” That is because the steps in
Paticca Samuppāda are CONDITIONAL statements. For example, “with avijjā (ignorance) as
condition, sankhāra arise.” One could also state that as “arising of sankhāra is dependent on the
presence of avijjā.” However, conditionality comes from the word “paccayā” not from “paṭicca.”
See, “What Does “Paccayā” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?.”
§ Therefore, “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ” should not be translated as,
“dependent on the eye and forms, eye-consciousness arises.” It is more than just
dependence. It is “coming together” or “coming to contact” of cakkhu and rūpa that gives rise
to cakkhu viññāṇa. “Paṭicca” happens with only those events that grab our attention.
§ There is also a deeper meaning of paṭicca in Paṭicca Samuppāda, where it is the combination
of two words “pati” + “icca.” When one attaches willingly to moral (immoral) deeds, one ends
up with corresponding “births” (“sama” + “uppada.”) See, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+” Sama+uppāda.”” That is why I do not translate Paticca Samuppāda as
“Dependent Origination.” There is more than “just dependence” in Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ However, in verse “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ,” paṭicca means
“coming together” or “contact.” Here there is no “intention.” It is cakkhu and rūpa making
contact. That is very clear in SN 12.53 and SN 12.54, in verse, “telañca paṭicca vaṭṭiñca
paṭicca telappadīpo jhāyeyya.” OR, “an oil lamp (telappadīpo) burns while the wick (vaṭṭiñca)
is together with oil (telañca).” If one does not add oil to the lamp, the wick will burn out
quickly. There is no involvement of the mind there. Thus, the “pati” + “icca” etymology does
not apply here.
Where Does Paṭicca Happen?
7. It is essential to remember that “cakkhu” (or cakkhāyatana) is not physical eyes (the Pāli word for
the physical eye is “nayana“). “Cakkhu” is the cakkhu pasāda rūpa that lies close to the hadaya
vatthu (seat of the mind), and hadaya vatthu overlaps the physical heart. That is far away from the
brain.
§ This cakkhu pasāda rūpa is the “internal āyatana.” It is commonly referred to as “cakkhu.”
§ The brain processes an image received by the eyes and then sends it to the “cakkhu.” We
discussed in the post, “Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa,”
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Dhamma and Science 541
§ Furthermore, the “rūpa” is the image of the external object (external āyatana). To be precise, it
is a “vanna rūpa” (or “rūpa rūpa“) in this case.
§ When that rūpa makes contact with the cakkhu, the cakkhu in turn “hits” the hadaya vatthu
(seat of the mind) and transfers that rūpa to the mind, that is the event, “Cakkhuñca paṭicca
rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ.”
§ That contact gives rise to the cakkhuviññāṇa in mind. Therefore, that sensory experience arises
in mind close to the physical heart. It does not occur in the brain (or at the eyes)! You may want
to refresh memory by reading #12 of the post, “Buddhist Worldview – Introduction.”
8. In the example discussed in #3 involves an ārammaṇa coming through as a sound (sadda rūpa).
Here the “sound rūpa” received by the sota pasāda rūpa (shortened to just “sota“) is the “sadda” in
“sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ.”
§ Any external sensory input is a form of energy. That is why they are all rūpa. There is some
confusion because most times a “rūpa rūpa” or a “vanna rūpa” is just written as a “rūpa.”
§ A sound is a sadda rūpa. You can figure out the other three: rasa rūpa, gandha rūpa, and
phoṭṭhabba rūpa.
§ A thought coming directly to the mind is a “dhammā” or a “dhamma rūpa.” Note that there is
no separate “pasāda rūpa” for dhammā, which makes contact directly with the hadaya vatthu.
Vipāka Vedanā Arise With That Initial Vipāka Viññāṇa
9. Let us consider “hearing a sound.” That is “sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ.”
This sotaviññāṇa is a vipāka viññāṇa, as we discussed in “Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka
Viññāṇa.”
§ As we have discussed, vedanā and saññā arise with each citta. Therefore, there are a vedanā
and saññā associated with that sota viññāṇa (which is a citta.) In other words, we know that we
heard the sound (vedanā), and we recognize what the sound is (saññā). The vedanā that arises
with that vipāka viññāṇa is a vipāka vedanā.
§ At this stage, there is no sukha, dukkha, somanassa, or domanassa vedanā generated. The mind
receives the sensory event. All vedanā associated with that initial sensory event is a neutral
(upekkhā) vedanā.
§ The only exception is “kāyañca paṭicca phoṭṭhabbe ca uppajjati kāyaviññāṇaṃ.” The sensory
contact through the physical body can generate a dukkha vedanā if it is due to an injury. It can
lead to a sukha vedanā if it is due to a body massage.
§ We will discuss sukha, dukkha, somanassa, domanassa, and upekkhā vedanā below.
The Second Type of Vedanā is “Samphassa jā Vedanā”
10. In the post, “Indriya Make Phassa and Āyatana Make Samphassa,” we looked further into the
“Chachakka Sutta (MN 148): “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhu viññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ
saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā.” Now we have a second type of vedanā due to “phassa
paccayā vedanā.” In that post, we discussed how the second type of vedanā arises due to
“samphassa.” It is a good idea to review that post.
§ That second type of vedanā is due to “contact with defilement in mind” or “san” or “anusaya.”
And that depends on each person, i.e., how strong a taṇhā is generated via greed, anger, or
ignorance. Therefore, this “samphassa-jā-vedanā” is mind-made.
§ An Arahant would experience the first type of vedanā, the vipāka vedanā. The second type of
vedanā would NOT arise in an Arahant because he/she does not have a defiled mind.
§ Now we can categorize vedanā using a different scheme. That will show that dukkha/sukha
vedanā arises ONLY due to the physical body. Other types of sensory contacts lead to
unpleasant/pleasant vedanā (domanassa/somanassa) in the MIND.
Two Types of Vedanā (Kāyika and Cetasika)
11. As we saw above, ALL vedanā belong to those two types discussed above: vipāka vedanā and
samphassa-jā-vedanā. However, there are other ways to categorize vedanā. The Buddha has taught
us how to examine a given entity or a concept in many different ways. Once one understands them, it
is easy to see which analysis is appropriate for a given situation.
§ The Buddha categorized vedanā up to 108 types. However, we do not need to discuss all of
them. We will consider only those that are relevant to common situations.
§ First, ALL vedanā belong to two categories of kāyika vedanā (those felt on the body) and
cetasika vedanā (those arising in mind.) Of course, all of the vipāka vedanā and samphassa-jā-
vedanā are in these two new categories. It is just a different way to look at them.
§ Those vedanā felt in the physical body (kāya) are kāyika vedanā. All other vedanā are cetasika
vedanā; they arise in mind.
§ In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Aṭṭhasata Sutta (SN 36.22),” the Buddha has discussed 108
types of vedanā. But for many situations, the above types of vedanā are sufficient for our
discussions.
5.2.6.4. Kāma Guṇa – Origin of Attachment (Taṇhā)
5.3
October 6, 2019
Kāma guṇa are pleasurable things in this world. It is because of kāma guṇa that we tend to attach
(taṇhā) to worldly things via either greed or anger (based on ignorance.) Based on kāma guṇa we
AUTOMATICALLY generate sāmisa vedanā. Those sāmisa vedanā, in turn, COULD lead to taṇhā
(attachment to worldly things.)
Summary of the Previous Post
1. In the previous post, we first categorized vedanā into two types: vipāka vedanā and samphassa-jā-
vedanā.
§ Then, later in the post, we categorized vedanā differently. Those vedanā felt in the physical
body (kāya) are kāyika vedanā. All other vedanā types arise in mind, and they are cetasika
vedanā. Of course, vipāka vedanā can be kāyika vedanā or cetasika vedanā. However,
samphassa-jā-vedanā are all cetasika vedanā.
§ Then kāyika vedanā can be three types: dukkha vedanā, sukha vedanā, adukkhamasukha
vedanā.
§ One may need to review that post: “Vipāka Vedanā and “Samphassa jā Vedanā” in a Sensory
Event.”
A Few Observations Based on the Previous Post
2. Now I need to add a few more comments. First, those kāyika vedanā are all vipāka vedanā. Those
are the ones that contribute to physical suffering (injuries, sicknesses, etc.) and bodily comforts (like
in a body massage.) Therefore, dukkha vedanā, sukha vedanā, and adukkhama asukha vedanā are all
vipāka vedanā, and they arise only with “bodily contacts” (kāyañca paṭicca phoṭṭhabbe ca uppajjati
kāyaviññāṇaṃ.)
§ All other types of vipāka vedanā come through eyes ears, nose, tongue, and the mind. Unlike
vipāka vedanā that come through the physical body, they are NOT kāyika vedanā.
§ Those are, at that moment, all upekkhā vedanā. We see, hear, smell, taste, or dhammā comes
to the mind. They are, “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ, sotañca paṭicca
sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ, ghānañca paṭicca gandhe ca uppajjati ghānaviññāṇaṃ,
jivhāñca paṭicca rase ca uppajjati jivhāviññāṇaṃ, and manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati
manoviññāṇaṃ.” Note that “kāyañca paṭicca phoṭṭhabbe ca uppajjati kāyaviññāṇaṃ” does
NOT appear here.
§ Then, samphassa-jā-vedanā arise following those initial vipāka vedanā. For example,
following hearing a sound (sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ), two more steps
take place before samphassa-jā-vedanā arise. They are in the “Chachakka Sutta (MN 148):
“sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā
vedanā.” As we discussed In the previous post, phassa paccayā vedanā is samphassa-jā-
vedanā. Those are vedanā that arise due to greed, anger, and ignorance.
§ Now, in this post, we will discuss that last step in detail. Why do humans get attached to some
sensory inputs via greed and to others via aversion (dislike)?
What Are Kāma Guṇa?
3. The Buddha said that this world is filled with eye-pleasing sights, ear-pleasing sounds, etc. for all
five physical senses. Each existence in the kāma loka has its own set of “attractive and enticing
sensory objects.” The Buddha called them kāmaguṇa or “sensual qualities.” As we know, kāma
means sensual. “Guṇa” means “qualities” or “characteristics.” Even though kāmaguṇa is one
word in the Tipiṭaka, I like to write it as two words, “kāma guṇa” since that helps remember the
meaning.
· For example, humans like certain types of food. Each animal species has its own “favorite
foods.” Lions and tigers like to eat meat. Cows don’t eat meat, and they eat grass. Pigs like to eat
all sorts of rotten food.
· As humans, we enjoy certain sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and bodily contacts. As long as one
has a human body, it is not possible to avoid generating a sukha vedanā due to such sensory
contacts. Even Arahants feel those.
Kāma Guṇa Are Enticing Objects, Sounds, Tastes, Odors, and Bodily
Contacts
4. Such sukha vedanā arise immediately AFTER the initial vipāka vedanā. As we discussed in the
previous post, all vipāka vedanā due to sensory contacts other than bodily contacts are upekkhā
vedanā. They are neutral.
§ However, immediately following that initial contact, kāma guṇa comes into play. Many suttas
discuss kāma guṇa, and they all have the following clarification of what it is. The “WebLink:
suttacentral: Nibbānasukha Sutta (AN 9.34),” states, “Pañcime, bhikkhave, kāmaguṇā.
Katame pañca? Cakkhuviññeyyā rūpā iṭṭhā kantā manāpā piyarūpā kāmūpasaṃhitā rajanīyā,
sotaviññeyyā saddā, ghānaviññeyyā gandhā, jivhāviññeyyā rasā, kāyaviññeyyā phoṭṭhabbā,
iṭṭhā kantā manāpā piyarūpā kāmūpasaṃhitā rajanīyā. Ime kho, bhikkhave, pañca kāmaguṇā.”
§ Translated: “There are these five types of sensual qualities (kāmaguṇa). Which five? There are
forms (rūpā) experienced with eyes that are agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, enticing,
and leading to desire. There are sounds (sadda) that are agreeable, pleasing, charming,
endearing, enticing, and leading to desire (and similarly for the other three senses.)
Vedanā Due to Kāma Guṇa Are Not “samphassa-jā-vedanā”
5. However, this somanassa vedanā that arises due to kāma guṇa are NOT the “samphassa-jā-
vedanā.” Somanassa vedanā due to kāma guṇa arises in an Arahant, as well as in an average human.
§ Let us clarify with some examples. Sugar or honey has a “kāma guṇa” of sweetness. That holds
for everyone from an average person to an Arahant. A beautiful woman will be seen as such by
anyone from an ordinary person to an Arahant.
§ However, “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā” in #2 above does not occur in an
Arahant. Even though an Arahant will experience somanassa vedanā due to kāma guṇa, an
Arahant would NOT get attached to that “pleasant/sensual feeling.”
§ Therefore, even though an Arahant would feel the tastiness of honey, he/she would not generate
any craving for more. An Arahant has comprehended that desire for ANY worldly pleasures
(sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and body touches) will only lead to future suffering. But it is
essential to realize that one CANNOT and SHOULD NOT suppress such desires with sheer
will power. That understanding comes after the Sotāpanna stage.
Vedanā Due to Kāma Guṇa Are Sāmisa Vedanā
6. There is a unique name for those “automatically-arising” vedanā due to kāma guṇa. They are
sāmisa vedanā.
§ The word sāmisa has origins in the keyword “āmisa,” which means “associated with the
sensual world” or “kāma loka.” Thus, sāmisa sukha vedanā mean a “pleasant feeling” that
arises due to the nature of the kāma loka. [āmisa :[nt.] food; flesh; bait; gain. (adj.) material.]
§ An Arahant, as well as an average human, will experience similar “sāmisa vedanā.” Any
sensory event of kāma loka is a sāmisa vedanā. We will briefly discuss the types of sāmisa
vedanā below.
§ We remember that the original viññāṇa (cakkhu, sota, ghāna, jivhā, kāya) resulted due to a
vipāka. Vipāka vedanā associated with those are upekkhā vedanā. (The only exception was
kāya viññāṇa, which could give rise to dukkha, sukha, or adukkhamasukha vedanā.)
§ Immediately following those vipāka vedanā, kāma guṇa comes into play, and sāmisa vedanā
arises automatically.
§ It is only after the generation of sāmisa vedanā that “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā
vedanā” comes into play.
§ I highly recommend the post “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha.” It has more
information that will help understand the concepts better.
Difference Between Samphassa-jā-Vedanā and Sāmisa Vedanā
8. Now we can see the difference between samphassa-jā-vedanā and sāmisa vedanā.
§ First, sāmisa vedanā are common to ALL HUMANS, including Arahants. They are the
sweetness of sugar or pleasing odors like perfumes.
§ On the other hand, samphassa-jā-vedanā are highly PERSONAL. They do not arise in
Arahants. For others, how strongly they arise depends on one’s gati AND the specific
ārammaṇa.
§ We also need to understand that samphassa-jā-vedanā arise BECAUSE OF sāmisa vedanā.
One gets attached to sensory inputs because they are enticing. As long as one does not see the
“hidden suffering” in those enticing sights, sounds, etc., one is bound to generate craving for
them.
§ Getting attached to ārammaṇa is “taṇhā.” One can get attached via greed, anger, or ignorance.
Let us discuss that briefly since it is crucial.
Taṇhā – Getting Attached via Greed, Anger, or Ignorance
9. Just like there are “pleasing and enticing things” in the kāma loka, there are also “unpleasant
things.” For example, rotten food tastes terrible, and we do not like loud or high-pitched noises.
Humans generate sāmisa dukkha vedanā when exposed to such sensory inputs or ārammaṇa.
§ Nonetheless, we get “attached” to them also. We complain about gad tasting foods or harsh
noises and may take actions to avoid them.
§ That is why “taṇhā” means “getting attached to ārammaṇa via either greed or anger.” We also
get attached to ārammaṇa due to ignorance, not knowing the true nature of them. See, “Taṇhā –
How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance.”
§ We get attached via greed and ignorance DUE TO sāmisa sukha vedanā and sāmisa upekkhā
vedanā. It is essential to realize that while everyone feels sāmisa vedanā, not everyone attaches
via sāmisa vedanā the same way.
Samphassa-jā-Vedanā Depend on One’s Gati And The Specific
Ārammaṇa
10. We have already discussed how samphassa-jā-vedanā arise due to one’s character/habits (gati)
and specific ārammaṇa. See, “Vipāka Vedanā and “Samphassa jā Vedanā” in a Sensory Event.”
§ An Arahant does not have any gati left (other than those without kammic consequences), and
thus would not generate taṇhā and, therefore, would not generate samphassa-jā-vedanā.
§ All others attach to ārammaṇa in different ways and at different levels. Whether one attaches to
ārammaṇa depends on that particular ārammaṇa AND one’s gati. For example, teenagers are
likely to gati to attach to loud music, whereas an older adult may dislike such music. In each
category of food, odors, sex, etc. some people attach more than others.
§ It is essential to avoid “bad ārammaṇa.” If one associates with those who drink excessively or
are engaged in drug use, it is hard to avoid getting involved with such activities.
§ In the same way, it is easier to cultivate good habits (gati) by associating with those who
already have good gati. Then one will mostly be exposed to “good ārammaṇa.”
Summary
11. So far, we have discussed the progression of events when a sensory input comes in per
“WebLink: suttacentral: Chachakka Sutta (MN 148).” For example, when an external object is the
ārammaṇa, the series of events start with, “Cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ.”
At that initial stage, it is just a vipāka viññāṇa. See, “Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka
Viññāṇa.” Then in the subsequent posts, we have been discussing the progression, “Cakkhuñca
paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhu viññāṇaṃ, tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā.” Now
we can summarize those steps as follows.
§ First, a ārammaṇa (in this case, a visual object) catches one’s attention with a vipāka viññāṇa.
In this case, it is a cakkhuviññāṇa.
§ Immediately, the kāma guṇa comes into play, and one experiences a sāmisa sukha vedanā if it
is a mind-pleasing object. That happens whether one is an average human or an Arahant.
§ Then the next part of the above verse, “tiṇṇaṃ saṅgati phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā”
happens in mind (within a fraction of a second.) One’s “san gati” come into play. If one has a
tendency to be attracted to that particular type of object, then one would attach to that object. If
it was an object that one truly dislikes, one would generate sāmisa dukkha vedanā and would
still attach with dislike or anger.
§ Now, another average human MAY NOT get attached either way. That is because that
particular ārammaṇa may not be his/her “type,” i.e., he/she may not have an interest in it. On
the other hand, an Arahant WILL NOT get attached (via like, dislike, or ignorance) to ANY
ārammaṇa.
Next Post
12. It took us a few posts to cover that, but I think it is essential to get these basic ideas clarified. It
may not take that long to go through the rest of the sutta.
§ Another essential point from the discussion so far is that sensory events are discrete. They do
not come in continuously. The mind handles ONE ārammaṇa at a time. However, since the
mind is very fast, it APPEARS that we are seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling body
touches all at the same time.
§ In the next post, we will discuss this critical point.
5.2.6.5 Buddhist Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and Contraception
Revised with a new title: November 10, 2018; revised November 14, 2018 (rewritten and
replaces What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?)
§ A human bhava can last thousands of years. On the other hand, a physical human body lasts
only about 100 years. In between successive births with “human bodies”, the gandhabba
(mental body) lives in what is called “para loka“. The para loka co-exists with our human loka,
but we cannot see those fine mental bodies of gandhbbas; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of
Existence and Births Therein“.
2. According to the suttas as well as Abhidhamma in the Tipiṭaka, a new human existence (bhava)
does not start in a womb. It starts at the cuit-paṭisandhi moment when the previous bhava comes to
an end. For example, if a deva dies and becomes a human, a human gandhabba (fine mental body)
will be formed at the time of death of that deva.
§ Then that human gandhabba will have to wait until suitable womb becomes available. By
“suitable” it means that the gati (loosely related to character/habits) of the gandhabba have to
match those of the parents, especially the mother.
§ Gati is an important concept in Buddha Dhamma that has been ignored for a long time; do a
search for “gati” on the top right search box to find about “gati“.
3. First of all, in order for a gandhabba to enter a womb, there must be a fertilized egg (zygote) in the
womb.
§ During mother’s menstrual cycle, one egg (ovum) is usually released from one of the ovaries
and is swept into the funnel-shaped end of one of the fallopian tubes.
§ After intercourse with the father, If a sperm penetrates the egg there, fertilization results and
the fertilized egg (zygote) moves down the fallopian tube toward the uterus.
§ A gandhabba can take hold of that fertilized egg (zygote) any time after its formed.
4. Once a gandhabba merges with the zygote, the cells of the zygote start dividing repeatedly as the
zygote moves down the fallopian tube.
§ Therefore, conception of a new baby happens at the time when the life-less zygote becomes
“alive” with the merging of the gandhabba. That is the time of conception and it happens
very early, normally within a day after intercourse.
5. A gandhabba may have to wait for a few days or even a many years until a suitable womb
becomes available; at that time, it will be pulled into the womb by the kammic energy, and the
gandhabba takes hold of the zygote in the womb that was created by a sperm fertilizing an egg.
§ As we saw above, Nature automatically matches the “gati” the parents (we can say that
matching the zygote that was formed by the union of the mother and father), and a “matching”
gandhabba will be “pulled in” by the kammic energy.
§ However, gandhabba concept is different from the concept of a “soul”. A gandhabba will keep
changing during its lifetime. Furthermore, it will make a drastic change when the lifetime of the
human bhava comes to an end.
§ This “human gandhabba” has a very fine body and thus cannot be seen.
6. The death of a physical body of a human does not mean its existence as a human has ended. If
there is remaining “kammic energy” for the human bhava left, the mental body (gandhabba) will
come of the dead physical body and will wait for another suitable womb.
§ However, if the “kammic energy for the present human bhava” is exhausted at the time of
death, then the transition to the next “bhava” or existence happens at the dying moment. If that
new existence is that of a cat, a “cat gandhabba” will emerge from the dead body; of course this
gandhabba has a very fine body that cannot be seen.
§ Here again the “cat gandhabba” will have to wait until a suitable “cat womb” is ready, and that
time it will get of the newly formed “cat zygote” in the womb of the “cat mother”. And a baby
cat will be born later on.
§ However, except for humans and animals, a gandhabba is not involved in most other realms,
for example, in deva and brahma realms.
7. Therefore what happens in a womb (when an egg is fertilized with a sperm) is just to provide the
“material basis” (zygote) for the gandhabba to form a physical body.
§ The “blueprint” for that physical body (i.e., the gandhabba) was created at the dying moment in
the previous life. However, the physical body will also take into account the features of the
mother and father via that zygote; see, #3 and #4 above.
§ All this is discussed in more detail in several posts, including “Ghost in the Machine –
Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body”,
and a more technical description in “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“.
8. Now let us see what happens when a condom is used and when birth control pills are used.
§ If a condom is used, then obviously an egg will not be able to come to contact with a sperm to
form a zygote. Thus there will be no “material basis” or a zygote in the womb for a gandhabba
to take hold of.
§ If the mother is taking birth control pills, again that will prevent a zygote being formed for a
gandhabba to start a new life.
§ Thus it is clear that there are no moral issues involved; terminating a life is not involved
in either case.
9. On the other hand, once the gandhabba “is in the womb” and has taken possession of the zygote,
then there is a living being in the womb.
§ Any procedure done after this “real conception” is equivalent to taking a human life; it
does not matter whether the procedure was done a month before birth of the baby or just
a day after the gandhabba came into the womb.
§ The only uncertainty is when the gandhabba takes hold of the zygote after it is formed; this
could happen immediately after intercourse or a few days after intercourse. By the time the
zygote arrives at the womb, there is a living being there; see #10 and #11 below.
§ Thus Buddha Dhamma provides a fairly unambiguous picture of the moral issues involved in
the birth control process.
10. It is important to note that science does not have an answer to the question of why all zygotes do
not result in pregnancies, and some couples who could not have babies for many years all of a sudden
have success. The actual conception time is also controversial; WebLink: wiki: Beginning of
Pregnancy Controversy
§ If the mother (and father) are prevented from having a child due to a previous kamma vipāka,
the resulting zygote will be a “dud” and thus no gandhabba can “descend to the womb”, i.e.,
pregnancy is not possible.
11. Sometimes the child may have different “gati” compared to the parents. For example, a “fairly
moral” couple may have a child with violent character qualities. This is likely to be due to a drastic
change of the mindset of the mother during the time the gandhabba “descended” to the womb.
§ furthermore, this is also why mothers who could not get pregnant for years, get pregnant during
a time period when the mother most likely had a “personality shift” or a significant change in
her mental state.
12. A clear account of the conception process is given in the suttas, and a comprehensive review of
those accounts are at: “Gandhabba State – Evidence from Tipiṭaka“.
§ A deeper analysis of how the next existence is grasped at death is given in, “Cuti-Patisandhi –
An Abhidhamma Description”.
5.2.7 Cloning and Gandhabba
March 5, 2018
1. Cloning of various types of animals has become common since Dolly was cloned in 1996. Three
sheep contributed to the birth of Dolly: one provided the egg, another the DNA (donor), and a third
(surrogate mother) carried the cloned embryo to term.
§ Obviously, the clone has most similarities with the donor and there is no “father” involved (no
sperm is needed). Are these consistent with the buddha Dhamma, and how does a gandhabba
play a role?
§ Also there are some myths associated with cloning, such as whether totally unexpected
“creatures” can result from cloning.
§ Therefore, it is good to review the key steps in the cloning process and to clarify these issues.
2. The basic procedure involved in the conception or the fertilization of a female egg by a sperm from
a male, and the subsequent incorporation of a gandhabba is discussed in the post, “What does
Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
§ However, in the case of cloning, a sperm from a father is not involved. So, we need to examine
the steps involved in the cloning process in order to see where a gandhabba would fit in. A new
animal or human life cannot be initiated without a gandhabba.
3. The basic process involved in cloning is nicely represented by the following diagram:
§ By the way, if you really need to understand this process, you need to print the post and read.
At least print this figure and have it ready while you read the material below.
This figure is from the article, “WebLink: 20 years after Dolly: Everything you always wanted to
know about the cloned sheep and what came next”.
§ You may want to read that article too. But let us go through the basic steps involved in natural
conception and in cloning process first, in order to see the commonalities and differences.
4. The main thing from the above figure on cloning for our discussion is that the yellow cell is the
egg from the mother. The cell on the top is from the “donor”; it is not a sperm.
§ The unique feature of the egg from the mother is that it allows the growth of a whole animal
with many body parts for doing very different things just starting with that single cell.
§ When an egg starts cell division, it splits — first into 2, then 4, then 8, 16, 32, 64, and so on —
it is not merely splitting. It is a complex process that produces descendant cells with a huge
variety of shapes and functions: bone cells, nerve cells, red and white blood cells; the cells of
the eyes, fingernails, stomach, skin, etc.
5. Eggs are the most remarkable of animal cells: once activated, they can give rise to a complete new
individual within a matter of days or weeks in some animals. No other cell in a higher animal has this
capacity; see #4 above. Egg cells also contain many mitochondria which supply the energy required
for cell replication and division.
§ The activation (or start of the cell division) is initiated differently in cloning compared to the
natural conception, as we will discuss below.
§ So, it is important to realize the vital role played by the yellow egg in the above diagram.
§ You can read more about the role of the egg at, “WebLink: How Does a Single Cell Become a
Whole Body?“.
But, first we need to look at what happens in a “normal conception” where an egg and a sperm
combine to form the unique cell called zygote, see also “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say
about Birth Control?“.
6. I could not find a figure like the above for the normal formation of a zygote by the
combination of an egg and sperm. So, let us use that above figure first to see what happens in a
natural conception.
§ In the case of a normal conception, the top cell in the figure (with the red nucleus) would be the
sperm and of course the lower yellow cell with the green nucleus would still be the mother’s
egg.
§ Instead of the removal of the green and incorporation of the red nucleus shown in the figure, in
this case of a normal conception, those two nuclei from mother and father will combine to
form a single nucleus in the yellow cell.
§ When that process is complete, the zygote is formed and the cell division is activated.
§ The only difference in Buddha Dhamma is that the cell division starts when a gandhabba
descends to the womb and merges with that zygote.
7. This is a key point. A cell whether animal, human, or of a plant, has no “sentient life”. The zygote
that results from the merger of the egg and the sperm is not a “new life”.
§ It is only when the gandhabba descends to the womb and take possession of that zygote that it
“becomes alive”.
§ And it is not a new life. The gandhabba already existed!
8. Most cells in a body have 23 pairs of chromosomes, for a total of 46. The egg and sperm are
different. Each egg and each sperm has only one set of 23 chromosomes, not a pair. When
fertilization occurs, the 23 chromosomes from the egg combine with the 23 from the sperm to create a
zygote or a fertilized egg with the full complement of 23 pairs of chromosomes.
§ In the case of a natural conception, the matching gandhabba will descend to the womb and will
be merged with that fertilized egg to complete the conception.
· So, we see that in a normal conception, the nucleus of the zygote — or the result of the merger
of the egg with the sperm — will be a cell with a nucleus that has half chromosomes from the
mother and other other half from the father.
· Therefore, a matching gandhabba would have gati that are a mix of gati of mother and father.
9. It is therefore clear that in a natural conception, the offspring will have bodily features and also
mental features resembling those of mother/father, since half the chromosomes comes from the
mother and other half from the father.
§ There is a small added contribution from the mother via the mitochondrial DNA that is in the
egg outside the nucleus. That is like a 1% contribution.
10. Now let us see what happens in cloning, which is the process shown in the above figure.
§ Here the nucleus of the egg is REMOVED, and the nucleus of the “donor cell” with the full set
of 46 chromosomes is INSERTED in the egg. That is the key difference in cloning. So, now the
nucleus of the egg has the full set of chromosomes needed to start cell division.
§ However, it seems that is not enough to initiate the cell division. An electric shock is required
to activate the process or to initiate cell division of this artificially created zygote. This is the
second difference compared to the natural process.
§ The artificially modified egg is placed in the womb of the surrogate mother, and an electrical
shock is applied to start the cell division.
§ Therefore, once the cell division starts with the application of the electric shock, which
eventually gives rise to an animal body made according to the DNA from the donor.
11. Even though that is the whole picture according to science, Buddha Dhamma says, there MUST
be a gandhabba merging with that cell in order to “give it life”. It is likely that the gandhabba
enters the womb and merges with the zygote at the time the electric shock is applied to initiate
cell division.
§ Just like in the case of natural conception we discussed above, there is no “new life” created
with cloning. It just created a suitable “temporary home” for the gandhabba.
§ When that physical body dies, the gandhabba would come out and wait for another womb to be
ready, if still has more kammic energy left for that existence (as a sheep in the case of Dolly).
Dolly actually died and it is possible that she was reborn as another sheep somewhere.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
552 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
12. Now, in the case of cloning, the following should be clear, according to science:
§ Mother that provides the egg, provides the all important platform for cell division that leads to
the formation of the new offspring.
§ However, 99% of the DNA comes from the donor. Therefore, the physical resemblance of the
offspring would be to the donor, as is the case with Dolly the sheep.
§ The surrogate mother who carries the embryo to term would provide no real contribution to the
physical appearance of the offspring, according to science.
13. That is pretty much the picture in Buddha Dhamma too, but with the following exceptions:
§ All three would contribute to some extent to the “mental qualities” in selecting a matching
gandhabba (which happens automatically), even though the major contribution is likely to
come from the donor.
§ Of course, we can only make a guess, since the Buddha never had to explain this particular
case. The Buddha specifically mentioned that the “mental state of the mother” at the time of
gandhabba descending to the womb is a factor. This is why even the most moral mother may,
in a few cases, end up with a baby who turns out to have immoral gati.
§ Therefore, the surrogate mother — within whose womb the actual descending of the
gandhabba would occur — could play some minor role in determining the behavior of the
baby, but not the physical appearance, i.e., the developing embryo would be affected by the
mood and health of the surrogate mother.
14. Studies done over the past 20 years with different types of animals show that:
§ The success rate is low, around 10%.
§ No monstrous creatures can be expected to form due to cloning. This is because the source of
DNA is the donor. Therefore, the clone will look like the donor.
§ It is not possible to clone an animal that is identical to the donor. Even if they look similar, their
character traits are different.
§ That observation from the cloning studies over the past 20 years, is consistent with our picture
of the gandhabba having gati close to that of the donor. No two animals can be the same. In the
case of a natural birth, gandhabba‘s gati will be close to those of both parents.
15. The main point from Buddha Dhamma is that a new life cannot be created by any means, whether
in a laboratory or anywhere in the universe. This is the only inconsistency with science here, and it is
a major inconsistency; the actual cloning process is compatible.
§ All living beings in existence now have been in the rebirth process forever. The Buddha said
that there is no discernible beginning to any living being.
§ Living beings just keep switching from realm to realm, but most are trapped in the lower
realms. While in the human or animal realms, they spend a lot of time as gandhabbas; see,
“Gandhabba – Only in Human and Animal Realms“.
§ So, an animal like Dolly would be switching from a “sheep gandhabba” to a sheep to a “sheep
gandhabba” to a sheep…until the kammic energy for the “sheep bhava” or “sheep existence”
runs out. When a matching womb becomes available either due to natural conception of via
cloning, the “sheep gandhabba” will descend to the womb and be born with the body of a
sheep.
16. So, I hope it is clear that cloning itself is consistent with Buddha Dhamma and specifically with
the concept of gandhabba.
§ I wrote this post in response to a question at the discussion forum: “WebLink: Gandhabba and
Cloning“. If there are more questions or comments, we can discuss them there.
1. Today, we have many different religions, world views, cults, and even different versions of the
Buddha Dhamma: Theravāda, Mahayana, Zen, Vajrayana (Tibetan), etc. Actually, Zen and
Vajrayana both originated from Mahayana (see, “Historical Timeline of Edward Conze“); thus
Theravāda and Mahayana are the two main categories. How could one decide which one to choose?
2. Here is a good example of an obvious inconsistency:
In Mahayana Buddhism, one is supposed to take a vow as to not to attain Enlightenment (Nibbāna)
until ALL BEINGS are ready to attain Nibbāna. Whoever came up with this idea did not understand
that there are an infinite number of beings.
§ On this Earth alone, scientists estimate that there are 10 trillion of just ants (million ants for
each human being!). It also displays a lack of understanding that most beings are incapable of
attaining Nibbāna, until a human or deva birth is attained, which are rare events; see, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ As the Buddha advised in the Kalama Sutta, everyone needs to examine the different options
and choose the one that is without any contradictions.
3. In Buddha’s time, there was of course no “science” that educated the masses about the physical
world. Even though the Buddha referred to the innumerable world systems and innumerable beings in
them, people just had to believe those only based on faith. Today we are fortunate to have a well-
established scientific method to rule out “bad theories” and to focus on “good theories”.
§ This method cannot match the Buddha’s method of deciding by EXPERIENCE that he advised
in the Kalama Sutta as mentioned above, but it gives a filtering mechanism to weed out the
stuff that is clearly not worth pursuing. Thus the scientific method can be used as “pre-
screening” to get rid of obviously unsuitable paths or “theories”.
4. What is the “scientific method”?
An acceptable “theory” must have,
§ power (ability) to explain as many things that we experience in this world,
§ consistency, i.e., not one explanation can be inconsistent with another within the same theory,
§ the power to predict, i.e., point out things that are still unknown but could be verified in the
future.
5. If one would want to read more about the scientific method, I can recommend two books: “The
structure of scientific Revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn is a classic; “The Beginning of Infinity” by
David Deutsch is a recent and more easy-to-read book which also discusses infinity which is a key
concept in Dhamma.
6. Thus explanatory power, consistency, and the power of prediction are the three measures of the
validity of a scientific theory. Buddha Dhamma is a theory about existence for someone who has not
yet “seen” its validity.
§ My goal with this website is to present the Dhamma as a scientific theory. I will try to point out
the explanatory power of the Dhamma, that there are no inconsistencies in Dhamma, and that
many things in the Dhamma that were so far ahead of the times and only now are being
confirmed by science.
§ In the following video Dr. Deutsch explains the start of the scientific revolution on a few
hundred years ago.
WebLink: YOUTUBE David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation
§ As explained above, science proceeds via conjectures (theories) that are continually tested.
There are no conjectures in Buddha Dhamma. The truths revealed in Dhamma are still being re-
discovered by science. The vagaries of life can only be explained in terms of Buddha Dhamma;
see, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek Good Rebirths“.
7. Buddha Dhamma is not a religion in the normally accepted sense of the word “religion”. The
Buddha never said that he can take someone to “salvation” if someone believed in him. One attains
Nibbāna by purifying ONE’S OWN mind. The Buddha just showed WHY one should strive for
Nibbāna and HOW to purify one’s mind by following the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Buddha Dhamma is a complete description of existence, or nature. A Buddha discovers the
laws of nature appears by his own mental efforts. It is for us to decide whether that world view
makes sense to us, and then to use the Path he showed to attain Nibbāna, the state of
unconditioned, permanent happiness.
§ One could start on the Path of the Buddha in a gradual manner, verifying for oneself the
benefits at each step; see, “Living Dhamma“.
Next, “Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem“, ………
5.3.1 Consciousness and the Brain
I think Professor John Searle is one of the great philosophers of today who have the right ideas about
consciousness. If he comes to learn about pure Dhamma, he may be able to articulate his points even
better. Here is one of his presentations:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Consciousness & the Brain
5.3.2 Matter Creates Mind or Mind Creates Matter?
The deep meaning of “Manopubbangama Dhamma, mano setta manomaya”, is that mind is the origin
of everything. This is unfathomably a strange statement at first, but when one studies Abhidhamma, it
becomes clear why this is true.
Before I get into the details, it is important to know that some scientists are beginning to realize this.
Even though they cannot yet make the right connection, they can see that the reality has to be that
way. It will be interesting to see whether how much progress they can make, without really
approaching the problem other than from Buddha Dhamma.
Anyway, let us listen to these “new ideas” from a special group of scientists. They are indeed new
from their perspective, since they have not been exposed to Buddha Dhamma, which is at the moment
is hidden for most people.
In the following video a group of scientists discuss why the time has come to change the paradigm:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Consciousness & Quantum Physics
Here is a presentation by Dr. Robert Lanza who’s book “Biocentrism” basically says that life did not
arise from matter (universe), but the universe arose from life (pretty much agreeing with the Buddha
Dhamma):
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Robert Lanza on theory of Biocentrism
o What is Consciousness?
o Consciousness Dependence on Number of Dimensions
o Six Kinds of Consciousness in Our 3-D World
o Expanding “Consciousness” by Using Technology
o Expanding “Consciousness” by Purifying the Mind
o What is Mind? How do we Experience the Outside World?
5.4.1 Consciousness Dependence on Number of Dimensions
2. Of course, we cannot even begin to imagine more than four dimensions (or more than three spatial
dimensions). However, it is easier to think of, and visualize, lower number of dimensions.
§ Imagine a two-dimensional creature living on your kitchen table. An ant would be the closest
real example, if we imagine that the ant cannot see above the table (a real two-dimensional
creature would have only a length and width and no height). Now if we put a hand on the table,
the 2D creature could see part of the projection of the hand on the table. Now if we take the
hand off the table, as far as the 2D creature is concerned, the “hand” disappeared; it cannot
“see” any part of the hand if it is off the table, and thus it has no “awareness” of that hand
existing anywhere. It does not exist in its “2-D universe”
§ For an amusing story of a 2D creature, see “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions” by
Edwin A. Abbott (2002). It was written in 1884 by Abbott, a mathematician.
§ Here is a “fun video” from Dr Quantum which illustrates the idea:
§ Thus, there may be beings in different dimensions that we are not aware of. We may be able to
see “projections” of them if there is some overlap in 1, 2, or 3 dimensions. If there is no overlap
at all, then we will not be able to see them at all, i.e., we will not be “conscious” of the presence
of them.
§ For example, in the low dimensionality case we considered above, if a 2-D creature crosses
over the “1-D line world”, the 1-D creature will see a “dot” during the time when there is an
overlap of the 2-D creature with the line. Yet, if the “1D world” lies above the table top, there is
no overlap and the both creatures will not be conscious of the presence of each other’s worlds.
5. It is possible the “see” beings other than humans and animals by developing certain jhānic
(abhiññā) powers. There were many yogis even before the Buddha who could access and interact
with such beings. One does not have to attain Nibbāna to do that, and there are Arahants who have
not developed such powers. In fact, the Buddha discouraged people from interacting with such
beings, particularly with those in the lower realms.
§ “Our world” is much more complex than what is grasped by our senses, even though
technology has enabled us to expand our consciousness; see, “Expanding Consciousness using
Technology“. Yet, we can expand consciousness even more by purifying our minds; see,
“Expanding Consciousness by Purifying the Mind“. A purified mind can see the truth in the
Buddha’s wider world; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ And our lives do not end with this one; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
§ Those two facts constitute the basis of the true nature of existence, and need to be thought about
critically; one cannot comprehend the message of the Buddha until one at least has some idea
about this “big picture”.
Next, “Six Kinds of Consciousness in our 3-D World“, ………..
5.4.2 Six Kinds of Consciousness in Our 3-D World
Having looked into the issue of the “awareness” or consciousness issue related to dimensions, now
we turn to our familiar 3-D space. Even here the possibilities are endless, as we see below.
1. We become aware of our surrounding “objects” (i.e., visual objects, sound, smell, taste, tangible
objects) using the five “external senses” of eye, ear, nose, tongue, and the body. We see visual objects
with our eyes, sounds with our ears, smell with our nose, taste with the tongue, and touch or feel with
our body.
§ Correspondingly, the Buddha stated that there is eye-consciousness, ear-consciousness, nose-
consciousness, tongue-consciousness, and body-consciousness. The cognitive processes that
involve those “five physical doors” are called five-door processes.
§ In addition to the above mentioned five traditional physical senses, in Buddha Dhamma there is
mind and the associated mind-consciousness, since we are also conscious about mind objects
such as thoughts and visual images. The mind-consciousness is also involved in each of the
five-physical-door processes.
2. Note that the Buddha did not mention brain in the mind-consciousness, and he used the term “mind
element” without mentioning the brain. This is because the mind belongs to the “manomaya kāya”
and the brain belongs to the “physical body”; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“.
§ Also note that five “indriyas”: “eye”,”ear”, etc are not the physical eye, physical ear, etc. The
five indriyas are called internal rūpa or pasada rūpa that are extremely fine and cannot be
seen.The physical eye is different from the pasada eye rūpa; but the physical eye is needed for
seeing for normal humans.
§ When one develops the mind, it is possible to see without the physical eye, and also much more
(like beings in other realms). Similarly, the mind is not the brain, but the brain is needed
for a normal human for the mind to work.
3. Therefore, our consciousness is limited by our six senses; we perceive the “world” as we sense it
with our six senses.
§ The “world” or “the universe” is much more complex than we perceive. This is one reason that
we think everything around us is permanent, and is why it is so hard for us to understand the
true nature of “this world”, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ With our “enhanced consciousness” from our scientific and technological advances, recently
we have realized that even our universe is not permanent; it came into being some 14 billions
years ago and will eventually re-collapse or disintegrate.
§ Furthermore, as I mentioned elsewhere, we can still “see” only 4%-6%% of the “stuff” in the
universe. The other 96% or so is termed “dark energy” and “dark matter” by the scientists
because we do not know what that 96% consists of; see, “The 4% Universe”, by Richard Panek
(2011). Thus, even though we have vastly expanded our awareness, we are far from being
conscious of the “world as it really is”.
4. In Buddha Dhamma, the above discussion with six sense bases applies specifically to humans, but
in general applies to many but not all animals as well as other beings in the “sense
sphere” (kamaloka).
§ The Buddha categorized all the living beings that are subject to the rebirth process in the
saṃsāra, and the categorization is according to the consciousness. Beings in the other planes of
existence have totally different kind of consciousness compared to humans or animals.
§ For example, beings in the Arupaloka (“form-less sphere”) have only the mind consciousness,
since they do not have physical bodies. Before getting into that discussion, let us first discuss
different aspects of consciousness that we see around us.
5. Even though the “beings” in the “sense-sphere” that includes humans and animals in general have
five external sense-doors (eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body), there are many exceptions.
§ For example, some animals do not have fully-developed five external senses. Others have
different types of sense doors; a jellyfish has eyes, but no brain for information processing, so
its visual consciousness is still very limited. It can distinguish between dark and illuminated
areas, and that is about all. On the other hand, a dog has visual consciousness comparable to
humans, and it can possibly catch a rabbit by chasing it.
§ A bat does not have visual consciousness, so it cannot hunt during the day time, but has
different consciousness using radar that enables it to hunt at night. So, it is clear that the
“consciousness” or “awareness” has many different “avenues” (for example, humans become
aware of their surroundings by using sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch, and thoughts).
§ Lower life forms may have less avenues of consciousness, and the degree of consciousness can
vary too (a jellyfish has minimal visual consciousness). In a few cases, we may be less
conscious than an animal. For example, a bat would be much more conscious about
surroundings in the dark, compared to a human.
6. Even though most of the animals have the same five physical senses as humans, they are “aware”
of only their immediate environment.
§ But the contemporary humans are aware of the existence of a huge Black hole at the center of
our Milky Way universe that is millions of light years away.
§ Humans used to have much limited awareness even a few hundreds years ago, before the
advent of the telescope and the microscope. Since then humans have slowly built up our
awareness by using technology; see, “Expanding Consciousness by Using Technology“.
§ However, we need to keep in mind that a complete theory of consciousness (Buddha Dhamma)
was described by the Buddha 2500 years ago. It had been hidden for possibly close to 2000
years, at least in its pure form.
7. Therefore, it is clear that “the awareness’ or the “consciousness” can come in different flavors as
well as different levels of intensity, even within the “sense sphere” (kamaloka):
§ The humans and devas in the kamaloka have the highest levels of consciousness (especially
mind-consciousness).
§ In the “form-sphere” (rupaloka), the consciousness level in general is higher, even though they
have only visual, auditory, and mind-consciousness; their minds are at a much higher level.
§ The beings in the “form-less sphere” (arupaloka) do not have physical bodies at all, and have
highly developed minds and thus have even higher levels of consciousness.
§ Those three levels of consciousness are called lokiya (mundane).
§ Beings in the three mundane levels have finite lifetimes, and a given “being” wanders through
possibly all these different planes in the unfathomably-long saṃsāra (rebirth process). Even a
sentient being born in the arupaloka may end up in the lowest level (apāya) in the kamaloka,
depending on the unspent kamma.
8. The higher levels of consciousness are supermundane or “beyond mundane” (lokuttara), and there
are four levels of supermundane consciousness with Nibbāna achieved by the Arahants being the
highest.
§ The first three levels of supermundane consciousness are Stream Enterer (Sotāpanna), Once-
Returner (Sakadāgāmī), and Non-Returner (Anāgāmī).
§ As one progresses on the Path, the consciousness starts to clear up, first by removing the five
hindrances (panca nivarana) at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Consciousness is totally purified by the Arahant stage; the pure mind becomes totally separated
from any trace of matter (four great elements or satara mahā butha) at the death of the Arahant,
and thus the Arahant is not reborn anywhere in the 31 realms and his/her mind becomes free,
Nibbāna.
§ All the suffering we experience is due to trying the satisfy the “body” that is attached to the
mind. When attachment to that body (which is subjected to decay and death) is severed, the
worldly bonds are broken (Nibbāna) and the mind attains the complete “cooled
down” (Nivana); see, “How to Taste Nibbāna“, and “Nibbāna – Is It Difficult to Understand?“.
Next, “Expanding Consciousness by Using Technology“, ……….
5.4.3 Expanding “Consciousness” by Using Technology
1. Focusing on the human world, we can expand our “awareness” or consciousness in two ways so
that we can be more “aware” of the “world” around us.
§ One is using the scientific approach and by developing new techniques that enable us to “see”
or “be aware” of things that are not directly accessible to our senses.
§ For example, we have infrared sensors that allow us to see in the dark; we have constructed
particle accelerators that allow us to “see” elementary particles; we can even “see” supernova
explosions that happen millions of light years away using our sophisticated instruments. In the
latter two cases, we do not actually see with our eyes, but we are aware of the existence of these
events.
2. However, it must be noted that we can “see” only about 6% of the “stuff” that our universe is made
of. Scientists don’t know what the rest of the “stuff” is made of and have labelled it as “dark matter”
and “dark energy”.
§ This means we are “not aware” of 94% of our own universe! For those interested, you can also
do a Google search on dark energy and dark matter and learn more.
3. The scientific methods which have been developed over only the past few hundred years are still at
a very early stage; even though science and technology has greatly expanded our “awareness” of the
external world, according to Buddhism there is much more to be explored, i.e., our consciousness is
still very limited.
§ We have not been able to contact any life form outside the Earth, even though scientists now
accept the existence of life outside the earth to be a certainty.
§ Possible existence of life forms that exist in the “form-sphere” and the “form-less sphere” are
not even contemplated at this time.
Next, “Expanding Consciousness by Purifying the Mind“, …………
Also see, “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma“.
5.4.4 Expanding “Consciousness” by Purifying the Mind
The other approach to expand our consciousness is by following Buddha Dhamma so that we can
“see things as they really are”.
1. Twenty five hundred years ago, the Buddha achieved the ultimate state of the mind and became
“all knowing” (or “perfectly conscious”). He came to know about the boundless universe, the endless
cycle of rebirths, and about the complex process of cause and effect (paṭicca samuppāda) which
sustains everything in the universe.
2. By developing scientific instruments (starting with simple telescopes and microscopes we have
now developed very sophisticated instruments), we have been able to expand our “awareness”.
§ For example, within the past century, we have expanded our awareness of the vast space around
us, and now we know not only that our universe is possibly infinite in extent, but there may be
other parallel universes as well. Yet, what the science has achieved so far is nowhere close to
the level achieved by the Buddha.
3. As humans, we may get close to the ultimate knowledge using the scientific approach some
day well into the future (especially if we are able to take into account the consciousness, and
mind in general, into science), but we can get there in a lifetime by developing our minds
following the path laid out by the Buddha.
§ Today’s Science and technology, for all their impressive “material achievements”, are still at
very early stages with respect to the mind phenomena.
4. According to Buddha Dhamma, one is said to achieve full and clear consciousness (anidassana
viññāṇa), i.e., that person will be able to “see the whole world as it is”, when he/she achieves
Nibbāna. This does not mean that a person who achieves Nibbāna will be an expert on relativity or
quantum mechanics. Relativity and quantum mechanics provide only partial explanations, and even
then just for materials aspects of the world.
§ When one achieves the ultimate knowledge (Nibbāna), by definition, relativity or quantum
mechanics become irrelevant, since they account for only some of the behavior of impermanent
and transient matter. Matter is secondary to mind.
5. Furthermore, even for people with good meditative skills, it is possible to expand their
consciousness by accessing higher planes of existence for brief times using meditative states (jhāna),
i.e., by controlling and focusing the mind.
§ Even before the Buddha, ancient Yogis were able to access such meditative states via
concentration meditation (samatha bhāvanā). For example, when Prince Sidharatha became an
ascetic on the way to the Buddhahood, he first followed two well-known yogis at that time,
Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, who were able to achieve very high states of jhāna (that
belong in the rupaloka and arupaloka) via concentration meditation.
§ However, it will be explained in the future that these jhānic achievements of such yogis can be
traced back to Buddha Kassapa who lived before Buddha Gotama.
6. Even today, people from other religions also could experience such states when they get deeply
absorbed in prayer or any type of deep mental concentration; this has nothing to do with a particular
religion. However, like everything else, such states are transitory; none of these states is permanent
other than Nibbāna.
§ And Nibbāna is not possible to attain via concentration meditation alone, and for that the
unique Buddhist system of insight meditation (vipassana bhāvanā) is needed whereby anicca,
dukkha, anatta, Paṭicca Samuppāda (Dependent Origination or “cause and effect”) and the
Four Noble Truths (that the existence in saṃsāra is dukha, attachment or craving as the origin
of the dukha, Nibbāna is the cessation of dukha, and the Eightfold Path is the path to cessation
of dukha) are understood.
7. To recap, according to Buddha Dhamma, “beings” exist in different planes of existence with
different levels of consciousness; different planes can exist in different dimensions as well as in
different physical locations (such as planetary systems in this or other universes, for example).
Beings are categorized according to their level of consciousness, and the humans lie somewhere in
the middle (but still at a very unique place, as is discussed in “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma”)
8. Being “aware” or having consciousness is only one aspect of a living being’s mental composition;
in Pāli, consciousness is viññāṇa. The other mental constituents that makes up a living being are
feeling (vedanā), perception (saññā), and mental volitions (saṅkhāra). Consciousness is nothing more
than “being aware”. Based on consciousness, the other three, collectively called mental factors
(cetasika), arise.
§ For example, when we “see” an object that is pure visual consciousness. Based on the visual,
we next recognize the object based on our familiarity with the object. This is perception
(saññā). These are discussed more in, “The Five Aggregates (Panñakkhandha)“.
9. The chief characteristic of perception is the cognition of an object by the way of a previous
acquaintance. It is perception that enables one to recognize an object that has been perceived by the
mind through the senses. According to Abhidhamma, “Its procedure is likened to the carpenter’s
recognition of certain kinds of wood by the mark he had made on each; to the treasurer’s specifying
certain articles of jewelry by the ticket on each..”.
§ It happens automatically since the mind compares the observed image with the stored images of
people we know and quickly makes the “match”. (I was happy to see that scientist Jeff Hawkins
has described this very well in scientific terms in his book “On Intelligence”; this book is a
worthwhile read to see how scientists are slowly making progress!). Of course, the more
frequently the memory is refreshed of the image, the easier it is to recognize.
§ Sometimes people, especially young children, are able to recognize people and material objects
from their past lives.
10. Modern neuroscientists and philosophers are struggling with how to even define these “mental
characteristics”. They have come up with the term “qualia” to represent the subjective aspect of sense
experience.
§ In his book “Second Nature: Brain Science and Human Knowledge” (2006), Gerald M.
Edelman, a neuroscientist, states (p. 14): “..The property most often described as particularly
mysterious is the phenomenological aspect of consciousness, the experience of qualia. Qualia
are, for example, the greenness of green and the warmness of warmth. But several students of
the subject, myself included, go beyond these simple qualities and consider the whole ensemble
of conscious senses or experiences to be qualia. Many consider explaining qualia to be acid test
of a consciousness theory. How can we explain not only qualia but all the other features of
consciousness? The answer I propose is to look into how the brain works, formulating a global
brain theory that can be extended to explain consciousness…”
§ In Buddha Dhamma, the qualia are the mental factors (cetasika), and they are built-in to
a sentient being and are strictly individualistic, so by definition they cannot arise just
from inert matter; but the scientists are trying to derive them from matter.
11. An interesting read on various ideas of different philosophers’ and scientists’ reasoning on how to
explain consciousness and associated mental aspects such as qualia is given in the book,
“Conversations on Consciousness” by Susan Blackmore (2006).
12. Let us consider, for example, the visual recognition of a person, say Joe Smith. With the
recognition of Joe Smith “feelings” arise together with a whole host of mental volitions, which are
fifty two in number in total, and we immediately feel a certain way about Joe Smith based on our past
experience. For example, if hatred, one of the possible 52 mental volitions, arise when we see Joe
Smith then we could be acquiring bad kamma as well if we let our mind cultivate those feelings
further.
13. It needs to be emphasized that pure consciousness does not entail recognition of an object. It is
only a sort of awareness – awareness of the presence of an object. When the eye comes in contact
with a color, for instance blue, visual consciousness arises which simply is awareness of the presence
of a color; but it does not recognize that it is blue. There is no recognition at this stage. It is
perception (saññā) that recognizes that it is blue. The term “visual consciousness” is a philosophical
expression denoting the same idea as is conveyed by the ordinary word “seeing”. Seeing does not
mean recognizing. The same is true for other forms of consciousness.
§ Viññāṇa, which incorporates all mental factors including saññā, vedanā, etc. has all these
mental factors in addition to the pure awareness.
14. Using a somewhat different nomenclature, a “being” in the sense sphere can also be represented
by just five “heaps of things” or aggregates (kandha), i.e., pancakkandha (pronounced as
“panchakkandha”, panca meaning five and kandha means a “heap”): consciousness (viññāṇa),
feeling (vedanā), perception (saññā), volitions (saṅkhāra), and form or materiality (rūpa); see, “The
Five Aggregates (Panñakkhandha)“.
§ These five components co-exist; they are born together at conception. It is not possible to
separate nama from rūpa or the four mental aggregates from each other. Therefore, nama does
not arise from rūpa as scientists believe today; nama and rūpa arise together from the
moment of conception in the mother’s womb.
15. The Buddha did tell his disciples that what he taught them was just a minute fraction of his
knowledge about “this world”, and what he has taught is sufficient to achieve Nibbāna and cut short
the sansāric journey filled with dukha (unsatisfactoriness and suffering). He did not want people to
spend their precious time in this human life studying things like the origin of the universe or the
origin of life which would serve no purpose in achieving Nibbāna. The following passages are from
the Simsapa Sutta:
§ Once the Buddha was staying at Kosambi in the Simsapa forest. Then, picking up a few
simsapa leaves with his hand, he asked the monks, “What do you think, monks: Which are
more numerous, the few simsapa leaves in my hand or those overhead in the simsapa forest?”
§ “The leaves in the hand of the Blessed One are few in number, Lord. Those overhead in the
simsapa forest are much more numerous.”
§ “In the same way, monks, those things that I have known with direct knowledge but have not
taught are far more numerous [than what I have taught]. And why haven’t I taught them?
Because they are not connected with the goal, do not relate to the rudiments of the holy life, and
do not lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-
awakening, to Unbinding. That is why I have not taught them”.
§ “And what have I taught? ‘This is dukkha… This is the origination of dukkha… This is the
cessation of dukkha… This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of dukkha’: This is
what I have taught. And why have I taught these things? Because they are connected with the
goal, relate to the rudiments of the holy life, and lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to
cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, and to Unbinding. This is why I
have taught them”.
16. But nowadays one may be justified to spend a little time to convince oneself that Buddha
Dhamma is indeed compatible with the contemporary “scientific knowledge”, because that will
enable one to build faith in Buddha Dhamma.
§ However, when one probes deeper into understanding the key concepts in Dhamma one
realizes that it is not a matter of science proving Buddha Dhamma to be correct, but
rather science is at a very early stage of discovering the true nature of the world as
described by Dhamma.
17. Let me close with an example on the difference between technological progress on expanding
consciousness versus that by the purification of the mind. The modern world was not aware of the
existence of microscopic living beings until the advent of the microscope by Leeuwenhoek in the late
17th century: WebLink: WIKI: Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.
§ However, a person who has developed meditation and attained higher jhānas can “see” such
microscopic beings. There is this story in the Tipiṭaka about a bhikkhu who had developed
abhiññā powers, but not yet had attained Arahanthood. One day he was about to drink a glass
of water, when he realized that there were numerous microscopic living beings in the water. He
tried to filter them out in vain and got depressed. The Buddha saw this and told him that, “it is
not possible to live “in this world” without hurting other beings; the only thing we can do is to
attain Nibbāna as soon as possible and get out of this world”.
§ Thus one can attain much more “knowledge” about this world by developing the mind. We can
probe deeper into the microscopic world by using the scientific knowledge achieved over
hundreds of years, but we can “see” much more by just purifying the mind in a lifetime.
Also see, “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma“.
5.4.5 What is Mind? How do we Experience the Outside World?
Revised January 17, 2019
1. Everything that we experience comes through six “doors” or “āyatana” we have to the outside
worlds: eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and the mind. Through those six doors we can see pictures, hear
sounds, smell odors, taste food, feel things physically by touch, and be aware of concepts (say,
mundane things like remembering past events or make plans about future events, or think about a
black hole in the middle of the universe or a mathematical concept).
§ The six sense faculties (and the corresponding six external “āyatana” which are rūpa, sadda,
gandha, rasa, pottabba, dhamma or visuals, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and concepts) are
what the Buddha called “sabba“, or “everything”. These are 12 āyatana (6 internal and 6
external).
2. All those sense experiences are done with citta or thoughts. But this is probably not a good
translation. We normally associate a “thought” with an idea or one visual event, etc., a moment of
“experience”. But citta is very fast and no one can experience a single citta which lasts a billionth of
a second or less; see, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“.
§ Don’t be fooled by the title of that post. It has a simple description of how the “mind” puts
together all six sense inputs to give the illusion that we see, hear, smell, taste, touch, and think
all at the same time (at least start reading at #3 there).
§ It is a good idea to also read the posts, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)”
and “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means” first.
3. When we look at an object, the “eye” generates visual consciousness (cakkhu viññāṇa):
Comprehending what is seen is accomplished via a series of very fast thought processes. There are
billions of thoughts per second, so each citta or thought moment is billionth of a second; see, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“. Let us see how the mind “sees” an object in a series of very fast
“snapshots” alternating between the “eye” and the “mind”:
§ The “eye” captures a snapshot of the object and the brain transfers that captured information to
mind: that process takes 17 thought moments or cittas (let us abbreviate it as TM); this series of
TM is called a “sense input citta vīthi” (or pañcadvāra citta vīthi). Next the mind analyzes
that “imprint” with three citta vīthi that involve only the mind. These latter “mind-only citta
vīthi” (manodvāra citta vīthi) are shorter, around ten TM, and try to discern what the object is.
It may first try to discern the color of the object for example.
§ Then the “eye” takes another snapshot and transfers that “imprint” to the mind, which in turn
receives it in a pañcadvāra citta vīthi containing 17 TM, analyzes that in 3 more manodvāra
citta vīthi containing about 10 TM, and makes better sense of the color. This “back and forth”
process goes on until the object is determined.
§ This process is slowed down only due to the time needed for the brain to put together the
information captured by one of the five sense faculties (pañcadvāra), for example, the eyes.
This time is of the order of 10 milliseconds; see, “What is a Thought?“. Thus there can only be
about 100 (600 if they are processed in parallel) or so “sense events” per second; since science
show that the brain has different regions for processing different sense inputs, the latter number
(600) is probably right.
4. Since these citta vīthi run very fast, once the brain sends an “information packet” to the mind it is
processed very quickly, within billionth of a second. Thus the process is slowed down only by the
brain. Still, everything about the object is grasped in a small fraction of a second.
§ Now, many of you may be thinking, “this looks like some far off theory made up by someone”.
The Buddha said he experienced everything that he taught. Phenomena in this fast time scale
are discernible only to a Buddha.
§ Once the Buddha explained the key aspects to Ven. Sariputta, it was Ven. Sariputta and his
group of Bhikkhus that developed the Abhidhamma, where all these details were worked out. It
took generations of bhikkhus to develop the Abhidhamma to the final form that was recited at
the Third Sangayana (Buddhist Council) and was written down in the Tipiṭaka in 29 BCE (we
know that there were many Arahants before 100-200 CE; see the timeline in “Incorrect
Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline“). For us, the truth of these minute details
become apparent as all observable phenomena are EXPLAINED using all three forms of
Dhamma in the Tipiṭaka: Sutta, Vinaya, and Abhidhamma).
5. As all this information comes in, the mind recognizes the object; this is saññā or perception.
Based on that recognition feelings (vedanā) are generated (for example when we see a friend we
generate a happy feeling; if it is someone we don’t like, it is a unhappy feeling, etc).
§ Once everything about the object is grasped, then if it is an “interesting object”, the mind may
start its own “wheeling around” process: the “pati +iccha sama+uppada” or paṭicca
samuppāda process leading to the accumulation of saṅkhāra: see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
Introduction“, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand“, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja,
Kamma Vipāka“, and other related posts. All these tie up together, but one needs to be a bit
patient since there are many inter-coupled concepts.
6. Thus experiencing a visual object in the above example generates all kinds of mental phenomena:
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and during this whole process we have the viññāṇa or citta flowing.
Viññāṇa is the momentary consciousness, a citta. In the above example, it alternates between visual
consciousness (cakkhu viññāṇa) and the mind consciousness (mano viññāṇa).
§ The baseline state of a citta, i.e., when the mind is not looking at an external object or thinking
about it, is called “bhavaṅga“. Here we do not “feel” anything, for example when we are in
deep sleep. The mind falls back to the bhavaṅga state even in between pañcadvāra citta vīthi.
7. Same kind of process happens with any of the five physical senses (the “back and forth switching”
between the sense faculty and the mind). When someone is just remembering a past event or
planning something, those are exclusively mind processes (only manodvāra citta vīthi take
place).
Now let us look at some details on how the mind processes all the “signals” from the real world
where multiple “signals” come in.
§ When we watch a movie, what happens is the projector projects about 30-50 static pictures per
second on the screen; a movie is a series of static pictures. When the projection rate is above 30
frames a second or so, our eyes see a continuous movie, not individual frames. Thus even
though cittas run at billions per second, we do not “experience” them individually, not
even close.
§ This fast rate of citta vīthis (which, as we saw above run at about 100 citta vīthis per second)
also make it possible to perceive all six inputs from the outside world “simultaneously”; at least
we experience them as “simultaneous”. For example, we can be watching a movie and enjoying
some popcorn; so we see and hear the movie, and taste popcorn and feel the popcorn cup, and
also may be thinking about something related to the scene on the screen; all at the “same time”.
§ Citta vīthi just alternate among the six sense inputs; it is possible only because there are
hundreds of citta vīthi per second. Since it happens so fast, we experience them all as
“simultaneous”, just like the static pictures projected at a fast rate on a movie screen are
perceived as a continuous “movie”.
§ Not only that, but the mind can ignore a multitude of “signals” that are of no interest to one’s
own habits (“gathi“) or cravings (“āsavas“). And those depend on the individual. Two friends
could be walking on the street, and one (woman) stops abruptly and starts looking at a dress on
a shop window. The other (man) looks at it, shrugs, and wants to move on; he would not have
even noticed it.
8. As we saw, information to the mind comes via the brain. All five physical sense inputs (vision,
hearing, smell, taste, touch) come through the brain. Thinking about concepts involves the brain too
(those involve only the manodvāra citta vīthi), and that happens much faster compared to the
processes associated with the five physical senses; we will discuss that later.
§ When someone gets old, the brain starts functioning less efficiently; see, “Manomaya Kāya and
Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“. Or, the brain may get damaged due to a kamma vipāka; for
example, getting Alzheimer’s disease is a kamma vipāka.
§ As the body gets old, various other body parts also start functioning less efficiently and are also
vulnerable for many kamma vipāka to come to fruition. Kamma vipāka are not deterministic;
they come to bear fruit only when conditions become suitable (see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma,
Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“). Thus meditation and regular exercise help keep both the body
and the mind (through an efficiently working brain) in good condition.
9. In any case, the mind goes to the “baseline or dormant state” called “bhavaṅga” even in between
these citta vīthi. When the mind is fairly inactive, say when someone is dozing off, the mind is mostly
in the bhavaṅga state. When someone is unconscious or in deep sleep, it is in the bhavaṅga state for
the whole duration. When seeing a dream, the mind is active.
§ Even when citta vīthis run at a fast rate of about 600 per second (say, while watching a movie
or while playing a competitive sport), the mind drops to the bhavaṅga state while the brain is
processing those “10 millisecond information packets”, as discussed above.
§ The above discussion is all about receiving information from the outside world and then getting
attached to “things” (“taṇhā“), generating mano saṅkhāra, etc.
10. Based on that process, we may decide to take further action too, either verbally or bodily, thus
generating vacī saṅkhāra and kaya saṅkhāra: We may speak or do some physical activity. All those
are done with the mind too, and each action done with thought process or citta vīthi.
§ This is why the Buddha said, “mano pubbangama dhamma, ,,,,”, i.e., “mind precedes
everything that we do…”. We cannot even lift a finger without generating a citta vīthi, i.e.,
without the initiation by the mind. The physical body, with the brain acting as a
“sophisticated control center”, helps the mind to achieve whatever physical activity it wishes;
see, “Neuroscience says there is no Free Will? – That is a Misinterpretation!”.
Further reading: “A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma”, by Bhikkhu Bodhi (2010). This
book has summarized citta and cetasika very well. But discussions on paṭicca samuppāda or anicca,
dukkha, anatta are not correct.
Next, “What is Consciousness?“, …….
§ Truine Brain: How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits
1. As we saw in the post, “Anicca – True Meaning”, anicca describes one of the three basic
characteristics of “this world”, namely no matter how hard we try, “we cannot maintain things to our
satisfaction in the long term”.
2. What does the Second Law of Thermodynamics say? It basically says, “things in a closed system
go from order to disorder, unless energy is put into the system to keep the order”. Thus we can
maintain a sort of stability (or “keep things the way we like them to be”) by striving or working hard.
§ But as we get old, our ability to do this wanes, and ultimately we becomes too weak to do
anything or just die. It does not matter how much money we have accumulated. All sense
pleasures lose their vigor as the body gets old, and money or will power cannot maintain them.
§ A successful business person could say, “look at all the wealth that I created. I have achieved
what I wanted”. It is actually a good accomplishment, but can he really enjoy all that in the long
term? Even all that money cannot maintain a simple thing like taste of food when he gets really
old, not to mention the fact that all that wealth will be left behind at death.
§ However, when we are young, it SEEMS that we CAN maintain things to our satisfaction. This
is why it is hard to explain anicca to a young person. A young boy will say, “look at the
muscles I built over the past year by working out at the gym! I am invincible”. A young woman
will say, “I look much more beautiful now than I was a year ago”.
§ Yet, blossoming at around twenty or so years is just the beginning of a slippery slope. In the
end all those strong muscles will fade, and the beautiful figure will sag and decay. That is the
reality.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Done Got Old
3. We can see the effects of the Second Law of Thermodynamics at different levels. A nice hot cup of
coffee will cool down with time and we will have to re-heat to enjoy it again. An ice cream bowl will
melt if not kept cold by putting it in the refrigerator which uses energy to run.
§ Mom will come and clean a child’s room, only to find the next day that it is back to the chaotic
state; she will need to go through all that work again to get it back to presentable condition.
§ We build a house with a nice garden, only to find that we will have to do repairs to the house
and much work is needed to keep the weeds out of the garden and grass cut, etc.
§ The Sun will power our planet for another few billion years, and then it will die. Long before
the Sun dies, the Earth will get destroyed.
§ Even our universe will “run down” in 15 billion or so more years.
4. Thus we can see that the concept of anicca is a universal characteristic of “anything that belong to
this world”, which includes 29 more realms than the two realms that we can actually experience (the
human and animal realms): Things can be maintained EVEN WITH EFFORT only up to a certain
time, and NOT forever.
§ The Second Law of Thermodynamics describe the impermanence or the “root cause” for
anicca. Even though the scientists understand this impermanence, they do not necessarily
PERCEIVE that in their minds with regards to themselves. This is the difference between
“impermanence” and anicca.
§ Just like a scientist who has contemplated on the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
anyone who is trying to cultivate “anicca saññā” by contemplating on impermanence is
nowhere close to Nibbāna; see, “How to cultivate the Anicca Saññā?“.
§ Thus, like those young people mentioned above, we all have the wrong PERCEPTION that “we
can maintain things to our satisfaction”, i.e., we have the wrong perception of nicca, not the
actual reality of anicca.
5. Even when our universe die, there are many that come into existence. This process has been going
on for eternity, and so have we. We have been in the rebirth process for ever.
§ The problem is that most of those lives were not as good as this one; we have suffered
unimaginably, and unless we get out of this predicament, such future suffering is not avoidable.
6. But the good news is that our minds can become free of this non-stop rebirth process by
decoupling from this unstable material base. We are reborn in this “material world” because of our
perception of “nicca”, i.e., we believe that we CAN find some suitable place with permanent
happiness in this world.
§ Once we grasp the reality of “anicca”, our minds will automatically start becoming free and we
will start feeling the nirāmisa sukha arising from this detachment from the material world; see,
“Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ This is another way to look at the reality and our choices.
1. When we get deep into Buddha Dhamma, we will see that the mind creates EVRYTHING in this
world. That is why the Buddha said, “mano pubbangama dhamma.……”, i.e., the mind is the
precursor to everything. But let us proceed at a slow pace.
§ By the way, dhamma is “what we bear” in this world (“darana deya” in Sinhala); this means
absolutely everything in this world. And all dhamma are anatta, i.e., fruitless, or there is
nothing substantial in any dhamma (it does not mean “no-self” or “anathma”); see, “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations,” and “Anicca – True Meanings.”
2. Everything happens due to causes and conditions; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything
Determined by Kamma?.” Also, this world is not four dimensional (3 space dimensions and time) as
we experience, but is multi-dimensional; see, “What Happens in Other Dimensions.” This is why we
see only two realms (human and animal) out of the 31 realms of existence; see, “The Grand Unified
Theory of Dhamma.” Just because we cannot experience directly or is not proven by science YET is
not reason to discard them. But the current string theories do predict a 10 or 11-dimensional
world.
§ What can be explained with Buddha Dhamma? Everything in this world. See, “Vagaries of Life
and the Way to seek “Good Rebirths”,” for some examples.
§ Also see, “Origin of Life.” This series explains how the mind creates EVERYTHING in this
world.
3. Furthermore, science has been confirming many things that ordinary people rejected as
“impossible” over the past few hundred years; and that activity started increasing over the past
hundred years since the advent of quantum mechanics and relativity; see, “Dhamma and Science –
Introduction.” That should give us more confidence on Buddha Dhamma. That is saddhā, or faith-
based on evidence.
4. Here we will discuss yet another recent finding in science that makes the process of rebirth more
easily “explainable”. Please note that I am not trying to verify Buddha Dhamma by science. It is
the other way around. I am saying that science is far behind Buddha Dhamma. Science is now
trying to catch up just the material aspects of how this world works amd has not made any significant
progress on how the mind works.
§ In the essay, “Evidence for Rebirth,” we saw that a person who dies in one geographical
location is reborn in another. The consciousness does NOT transmigrated as is believed in some
other religions. However, some form of energy leaving one place must instantly appearing at
another.
§ What about the speed of light barrier for anything or any information to travel, based on
Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity? It turns out that we are in a unique time in history.
Buddha’s teachings are beginning to be, even if not absolutely confirmed, at least elevated to
the level of possibility by Western science. For millennia, numerous people had strong enough
faith to believe Buddha’s words and to commit their entire lives to pursue Nibbāna. (Actually it
is not blind faith. If one studied the Dhamma / Abhidhamma carefully, one can verify that it
must be true).
5. In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen published a paper that showed that if quantum mechanics
is correct, then a particle can somehow “know” what another particle, even if separated from it by a
large distance, is doing. Einstein derisively called this “spooky action at a distance” and dismissed the
prediction. Even though his theories led to the foundation of quantum mechanics, Einstein was firmly
opposed to quantum mechanics throughout his lifetime.
§ However, in 1964, physicist John Bell proposed an experiment to test this concept. Those are
experiments on “violation of Bell's inequality.” Several experiments carried out since 1997
proved that Einstein was wrong. The experimenters created “entangled particles” which shared
a wave function. In 1997 Nicholas Gisin did the first experiment with entangled photons, in
which they were sent seven miles apart via optical fibers. When they reached the ends of these
fibers, the two photons were forced to make random choices between alternative, equally
possible pathways.
§ There was no way for the photons to communicate with each other, “classical” physics would
predict that their independent choices would bear no relationship to each other. But when the
paths of the two photons were adjusted correctly and the results compared, the independent
decisions by the paired photons always matched. There was no real way for them to
communicate with each other. The responses were instantaneous, even though at the speed of
light the two events were separated by about 26 milliseconds.
6. Since then, that same experiment has been repeated with electrons and ions as well. This effect is
called the “quantum entanglement,” It leads directly to other related concepts such as “holographic
universe” and “interconnectedness.” The conclusion seems to be that entangled particles can be
interconnected even if they are situated across the universe!
§ In late 2015, “nonlocality of nature” or the violation of Bell’s inequality was confirmed in three
“loophole-free” experiments; see the pdf, “WebLink: PDF File: Wiseman-Death by experiment
for local realism-Nature-2015.”
§ And the first of those experiments is: “WebLink: Hensen-Loophole-free Bell Inequality-
Nature-2015.”
§ Details at “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma.”
7. The following fun video by Dr Quantum illustrates the basic idea of quantum entanglement:
It was Einstein’s dream to work out such a Grand Unified Theory, but he was unable to do so. Many
scientists are trying to accomplish this goal, and the newest theories are called string theories. No
Grand Unified Theory exists yet, but the closest is a version of string theory called the M-theory. M-
theory says that ours is a 11-dimensional universe, even though we can see only four dimensions
(including time). So, could there be life existing in other dimensions that we cannot observe? That is
another possibility. I briefly discuss this possibility under the heading, “What Happens in Other
Dimensions?.” [Consciousness Dependence on Number of Dimensions]
Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics
March 13, 2018: I have started a new section “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma,” where a new
interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented. I explain why quantum theory cannot explain
consciousness.
Next, “What is Mind? - How do we Experience the Outside World?”, …….
5.5.3 Infinity – How Big Is It?
1. What is the largest number you can think of? Well, just add one and you have a larger number!
There are some large numbers that we are aware of. With record budget deficits of the developed
nations in trillions of dollars (and the total nominal value of all the derivatives traded around the
world approaching a thousand trillion dollars, or a quadrillion dollars), trillion and quadrillions are
indeed large numbers.
§ Even though a trillion rolls off the tongue not very different from a billion, a trillion is much
bigger than a billion. If you spend a billion dollars a day, it will take a thousand days to spend a
trillion dollars.
2. The number of molecules in a cubic centimeter of gas is 2.7 x 1018 or 2.7 x 10^18 (this a simple
way to express big numbers; instead of writing 10000, we write 104 or 10^4). Since electrons are
even smaller, you would think there would be a humongous number of electrons in the observable
universe; the estimated number is around 1087. This is of course a very large number, but is not
infinity by any means.
§ This should give you an idea of the power of an exponent. Each time the exponent goes up by
one, the number becomes 10 times bigger. So, even though 1087 may not look that big
compared to 1018, it is a humongous increase. Another large number should be the distance
from the Earth to the edge of the observable universe, and it is estimated to be about 46 billion
light years or around 1023 miles. Even though such large numbers are hard to be contemplated
in our minds, they are all finite.
3. There are some famous large numbers. A Googol is 10100, which is unimaginably large compared
to even the number of electrons in the universe (1087). As an aside, the internet company Google was
to be named Googol, but someone made a mistake and Google was the name that was given. A
Googolplex is a whopper; it is 10Googol or 10(10^100). There are many such “famous large
numbers”.
§ Yet, you can add one to any of these large numbers and always get a bigger number. Therefore,
no number, however large, is still finite.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Googol and Googolplex by Carl Sagan
4. So, the mathematicians coined the term “infinity” to denote an indefinitely great number; The word
comes from the Latin infinitas or “unboundedness”. Since infinity is uncountable, it has some strange
characteristics: whatever you add to (or multiply by) an infinity (even if it is another infinity), you
still end up with infinity.
§ The famous German mathematician David Hilbert illustrated the “abnormal” properties
associated with infinity using the idea of a “infinity hotel”, which has an infinite number of
rooms. The “infinity hotel” always has a vacancy: the management can always ask the person
occupying the Nth room to move to the (N+1)th room, (N+1)th room to move to the (N+2)th
room, and so on, and thus give the Nth room to the new guest. In fact, even if an infinite
number of new guests arrive, the hotel can accommodate all of them!
5. This is not to say that infinity is a useless or bogus concept. The arguments described above are
totally valid. Mathematicians cannot do many integrations without infinity. Physicists use infinity all
the time (but they try to end up with finite physical values).
§ The concept of infinity is real (and weird). For example, a line of any finite length has an
infinite number of points, whether it is an inch in length or thousand miles in length. Invention
of calculus by Newton and Leibniz helped handling some of the problems arising from such
situations.
6. In the physical sense, infinity is a rather vague concept meaning, “larger than anything that could
in principle be encompassed by experience”. For example, space is infinite, and as far as our
sophisticated instruments allow us to “see”, there is no end.
§ Our universe is possibly infinite in extent, since the scientists can “see” only to a finite extent.
Besides there are possibly infinite numbers of universes as well. So, the space is infinite.
§ What about time? If our universe started at the Big Bang, that inflationary theory says there are
multiple, parallel universes. According to the “cyclic theory” model, which is an alternate
theory, the same universe comes to a “Big Crunch” which leads to another Big Bang, and
whole process keeps repeating. So, there is no beginning to time either; time is infinite.
§ According to the “cyclic theory” model, which is an alternate theory, the same universe comes
to a “Big Crunch” which leads to another Big Bang, and whole process keeps repeating. So,
there is no beginning to time either; time is infinite.
§ By the way, both those theories are not correct according to Buddha Dhamma. It is individual
star systems (called “Cakkāvāta“) that undergo birth-destruction cyclic process.
§ I will write more in the future, but see the discussion: “WebLink: Multiverse: Different
Physical Laws and Different Dhamma?“. It is the lifetime of a Cakkāvāta (like our Solar
system) that is called a Maha Kappa (great eon) in Buddha Dhamma.
7. The Buddha used a great eon as the measurement unit to help his followers visualize the enormous
length of saṃsāra. The length of a great eon (mahā kalpa or mahā kappa) is said by the Buddha to be
longer than the time it would take a man to wear away a mountain of solid granite one yojana (about
7 miles) around and one yojana high, by stroking it once every hundred years with a silk cloth. These
days scientists use the word “eon” to denote the duration of a universe (from the “big bang” either to
a “big crunch” or just fading away).
§ These days scientists use the word “aeon” to denote the duration of a universe (from the “big
bang” either to a “big crunch” or just fading away). But a Maha Kappa just means the lifetime
of our Solar system; our universe has “no beginning”. In the future it will be shown that the
“Big Bang theory” is not correct (which says that our universe came to existence from nowhere
in a “Big Bang”); see the discussion: “WebLink: Multiverse: Different Physical Laws and
Different Dhamma?“.
8. Just for fun, I estimated the mass of the material that needs to be removed by the silk cloth each
time (this happens every 100 years). Using a 7 mile cube of stone with a density of 2515 kg per cubic
meter, I calculate the mass of the mountain to be 3.5 x 10 ^6 kg.
§ Assuming the lifetime of our universe to be 30 billion years, I calculate the mass removed by
each stroke is about 12 grams or about 0.4 ounces. This appears to be a reasonable number! So,
a kalpa in Buddhism turns out to be approximately an eon as perceived by the scientists.
§ When we try to visualize the wearing off a mountain we can imagine how long a time period
that is. Yet, that is still nothing compared to the length of the saṃsāra. As I said, infinity is a
concept that is hard to wrap one’s mind around!
9. One day the Bhikkhus asked the Buddha how many great eons had already passed and gone by.
The Buddha told them, “Suppose, Bhikkhus, there were four disciples here each with a lifespan of
hundred years, and each day they were each to recollect a hundred thousand great eons. There would
still be great eons not yet recollected by them when those four disciples pass away at the end of
hundred years. Because, Bhikkhus, this saṃsāra is without discoverable beginning”.
§ An interesting book that talks about such hard to grasp ideas (in science) involving infinity is,
“The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World” by David Deutsch.
§ Infinity is a mind-boggling concept; see, “The Infinity Problem in Buddhism“.
10. Here is a bit longer video on why it is not possible to discover either spatial boundaries of our
universe or find a “beginning” to time, because universes come into existence all the time.
1. Mathematician Kurt Gödel, in his Incompleteness Theorem, proved that it is impossible to find
complete “truth” or “complete explanations” of a system from WITHIN a system.
§ No theory that any scientist discovers is, thus, cannot be proven to be the “ultimate truth”. This
is another way of saying that by examining the parts one cannot get the complete picture of the
system, IF one is within the system.
2. The Buddha transcended “this world” by developing his mind; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma” for a description of the 31 realms of existence.
§ This is again something that cannot be proven by a human being. One accepts, as I have, of the
truth of that by examining the evidence: that the Buddha was able to explain so much about
“this world” 2500 years ago. By “this world” it is meant not only the Earth or even this
universe, but total existence.
3. The only way to disprove what I stated above is to find inconsistencies within the Buddha
Dhamma (this is the same method used by the scientists in assessing scientific theories). I have not
found any.
§ If you find anything inconsistent about the Buddha Dhamma, that is because there have been
numerous “alterations” over the past 2500 years. But if you find any inconsistencies at this site,
please let me know. If there are any, that is due to my possible carelessness or ignorance and I
should be able to fix them.
§ In fact, this is the only way to get rid of any inconsistent “bits and pieces”. Just like if you have
a piece of a puzzle at the wrong place that will only hinder the progress of solving the puzzle,
having wrong information somewhere will only slow down our progress in “figuring out the
pure version of the Buddha Dhamma”.
§ However, I do believe that the “big pieces of the puzzle” are in correct places here.
4. Kurt Gödel would have really enjoyed Buddha Dhamma. It would have been tremendous if he was
alive to go trough the material here and point out any inconsistencies. Many of the scientists that I
admire, including Einstein, Feynman, Gödel, Heisenberg, de Broglie, Sagan, and many more would
have been able to easily grasp the message of the Buddha, but unfortunately they never came across
the pure Dhamma; David Bohm came close.
§ I hope the current generation of scientists and philosophers will get an opportunity to examine
the pure Dhamma.
5. I do not want wrong impressions to come out of this post. I love science and physics in particular.
Before discovering the pure Dhamma, physics was my passion and I still try to keep up with new
findings.
§ Yet I have realized that discovering how inert matter behave is a minute fraction of the
knowledge about the whole existence. We cannot even discover everything about matter, until
we start finding out more about the mind. The Buddha said, “mano pubbangama Dhamma…“,
or “the mind precedes everything in this world….”.
6. Let me give some examples. Albert Einstein introduced his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905
and his General Theory of Relativity in 1915. The first showed that Newton’s Three Laws of Motion
were only approximately correct, breaking down when velocities approached that of light. The
second showed that Newton’s Law of Gravitation was also only approximately correct, breaking
down when gravitation became very strong.
§ We could not see anything wrong with Newton’s laws of motion until we developed
technologies that transcended our “level of consciousness”; see, “Expanding ‘Consciousness’
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Dhamma and Science 573
by Using Technology“. They worked well within our “probing sensitivities”. Even today,
scientists do not use relativity equations to map out rocket trajectories to the Moon; Newton’s
equations are good enough to that.
§ In the same way, everything that science discovers just expands our horizons, but never will
provide the “ultimate answers”. We can find “everything about this world” just by purifying
our minds; see, “Expanding ‘Consciousness’ by Purifying the Mind“.
§ The above statements may not mean much right now. However, I ask you to be patient and go
through the material at the website, and gradually you may realize what I am trying to say.
7. A “good theory” is all about “testable predictions”. As I stated on the home page, I try to present
material on Buddha Dhamma as a “theory on how the nature works”. As I pointed out in many
essays, many of the “predictions” or “statements” about the nature of this world have proven to be
correct by science over the years, especially during the past few hundred years.
§ I can make another prediction just for the records. Darwin’s theory of evolution will be proven
to be only partly correct, and only for limited spans of time. The theory of evolution is correct
only over the recent past of this planet, where we can trace the past events using techniques
such as radiocarbon dating; the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by radiocarbon dating
go back to around 50,000 years ago. Even if we put the limit at a million years, that is only a
tiny fraction of over four billion year lifespan of the planet.
§ What is correctly stated in the theory of evolution is that species arise when conditions become
suitable for them to arise AND for them to survive.
8. However, it is dangerous to talk about concepts that are not amenable to our minds. That will lead
only to “loss of faith”. It would be impossible to explain to someone who time traveled to the present
time from several hundred years ago, how a light bulb can light up just by flipping a switch. There is
no way for that person to “grasp” the concept of an electric current; he/she would believe it to be a
“magic trick”.
§ The Buddha never revealed any details of the nature that were not discernible to at least his top
disciples at that time. Let me give an example from the Tipiṭaka. One time Ven. Moggallana,
who was only second to the Buddha in Abhiññā (supernormal) powers, saw a large number of
beings in the peta realm near the Gijjakuta mountain. Beings in the peta realm have very fine
bodies that can be seen by those with abhiññā powers, and some varieties have such fine bodies
that only a few people with highly-developed abhiññā powers can see them.
§ So, none of the Arahants that were there who had abhiññā powers, could see them and they told
Ven. Moggallana, “how come we cannot see them?”. Ven. Moggallana told them to ask the
Buddha. The Buddha told those Arahants that he had actually seen them previously. When the
bhikkhus asked why the Buddha did not mention it to them, he told them that, “If I tell you
something that you cannot verify by yourselves, that will only lead to doubts. That is why I did
not mention it. But now that Moggallana has seen them, there is at least one person there to
confirm it”.
9. Even today there are people with abhiññā powers that can see some of these beings in other
realms. My teacher Theros say they can see them and I have no reason to doubt them. Developing
abhiññā powers requires being able to get to the fourth jhāna AND then working to develop those
powers. So, it is not an easy task. If I ever get to that stage, I will mention that here.
§ Developing abhiññā powers or even jhānas is not necessary to attain Nibbāna. One can even
attain the Arahanthood without developing any jhāna ahead of the time.
§ What is important is to experience the “cooling down” of Nibbāna even without getting to the
Sotāpanna stage. That itself provide incentive to continue with the practice; see, “How to Taste
Nibbāna“.
References
For those who would like to read more on this subject, the following references could be useful.
However, I do not encourage anyone to “go off the track”. I included this section to make the point
that all existing scientific theories are incomplete, because they all were generated within the system.
The Buddha was able to transcend “this world” and thus was able to provide a complete world view.
“Gödel’s Proof”, by Ernst Nagel and James R. Newman (2001).
“Gödel – A Life of Logic”, by John L. Casti and Werner DePauli (2000).
“Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel”, Rebecca Goldstein (2005).
“There’s Something about Gödel”, Francesco Berto (2009).
“Gödel, Escher, Bach – An Eternal Golden Braid”, by Douglas R. Hofstadter (1979).
Next, “Consciousness – A Dhamma Perspective“, ………
5.5.5 Truine Brain: How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits
Revised December 20, 2016
Human brain, which is the most advanced for all animals, shows how different animals have
“different levels” of consciousness. It has three distinctive regions (see the figure below): (1) brain
stem (labelled “reptilian” in the figure), (2) limbic system, (3) cerebral cortex or just cortex (labelled
“neo-cortex” in the figure).
1. The brain stem (lizard or reptilian brain) is the most primitive and all developed animals have it. It
governs automatic physiological functions such as the heart rate, respiration, digestion, etc.
§ And that is all lowest-ranked animals can do (automatically). They are almost like fully-
automated robots.
2. The limbic system (sometimes called the midbrain) is the emotional command center; that evolved
in the next “intellectual phase” in animals with somewhat higher intelligence.
§ It coordinates sensory reception, memory, and unconscious emotional reactions. These animals
with limbic system — like snakes and lizards — just react spontaneously to external influences.
§ Humans tend to do that too. In case of a threat, the “fight or flight” decision is made
instantaneously by the limbic system. Very loosely, we could say that automatic mano
saṅkhāra arise via the limbic system; see the “Living Dhamma” section.
§ It is quite clear from the definition of an Arahant that even this instantaneous response can be
completely tamed by meditation.
3. The cerebral cortex (learning brain; neo-cortex in the figure) is the most advanced part of the brain;
it can make “rational decisions” by contemplation but it is time delayed. Therefore, it is called the
“thinking brain”. The cortex is responsible for language capability, logic, reasoning, learning and
critical thinking, the good stuff. All primates have it, but of course the humans have the largest.
§ The cortex is responsible for language capability, logic, reasoning, learning and critical
thinking, the good stuff. All primates have it, but of course the humans have the largest.
§ The cortex is involved in generating vacī and kaya saṅkhāra that arise with a time delay. By
controlling our vacī and kaya saṅkhāra, we have the ability to change our gathi. This is the
“modern scientific rationale” behind the basis of Buddha Dhamma; see the “Living Dhamma”
section.
4. All our sense inputs are processed in the cortex before they are sent to the hadaya vatthu or the
“seat of the mind” that is located in the gandhabba close to our physical heart.
§ Since it takes time for our brains to analyze the “incoming data”, normally there is about 100th
of a second time delay between incoming sense inputs and our mind generating thoughts about
that sense input.
§ The brain can handle only one sense input at a time. This means it can handle only about 100
sense inputs in a second. So, even though our minds generate an initial response quickly, the
follow-up “thoughts” are delayed due to this “processing delay” in the brain.
§ I will discuss this in more detail (and it has been discussed in bits and pieces in the posts on the
gandhabba, but the key point is that our actions and thoughts are “slowed down” by this pre-
processing in the cortex.
§ That pre-processing is minimal in even in “higher animals” with small cortexes, like dogs and
apes. This is why humans are unique. We have a large cortex that not only slows down the
response time, but also helps us “analyze the situation” rationally.
5. One aspect of the role has been illustrated in the following case. A developed left brain (of the neo-
cortex) indicates compassion for others and enhanced happiness for oneself, and a relatively larger
right side indicates aggressive character.
§ Here is the link to a video showing the results of brain scans of an advanced meditator who had
done loving kindness meditation for a long period of time compared to 150 non-meditators.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Matthieu Ricard: The habits of happiness
The discussion on the brain scan data is from about 17:00 to about 18:20 minutes, if you don’t want
to watch the full video.
§ We must also keep in mind that Tibetan loving kindness meditation is an anariya version of the
metta bhāvanā; see below.
6. Until about late 1980’s there was wide belief that one had just to live with the brain that one was
born with. But since then the ability of the brain to change (neuroplasticity of the brain) has been
demonstrated and studies on the effects of meditation on the brain has become an active research
field.
§ Of course, 2500 years ago the Buddha said that mind is the precursor to everything, and that
any body part (including the brain) is controlled by the mind. The mind does not arise from the
brain; the mind controls the brain.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
576 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ The key is that insight meditation should DRASTICALLY change neural wirings; no studies
have been done on the brain of someone who has cultivated the “correct versions” of
satipatthāna and ānāpānasati meditation.
§ There are other posts at the site which describe this “re-wiring” of the cortex that leads to
change in our gathi.
7. As shown in the references below, there is compelling scientific evidence that even mundane
versions of meditation improves both the cortex AND the limbic system.
§ Those studies show that basic samatha meditation helps, but metta Bhāvanā (compassion
meditation) is particularly effective.
§ It must be noted that Tibetan samatha (breath meditation) or metta bhāvanā (mundane version)
are anariya versions. For the Ariya versions, see, “6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)” and
“5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness Meditation)“. I am quite positive that brain scan of
an Ariya (Noble person) will yield more interesting results.
§ For example, we also know that meditation affects breathing patterns (thus the brain stem). so
the overall brain function is affected by meditation. An Arahant can stop breathing for up to 7
days in Nirodha Samapatthi. It will be extremely interesting to see a brain scan of an Arahant.
8. Neural pathways in the brain are strengthened by:
§ Repeated application (meditation included). Repeated activity forms both good and bad habits
as we discussed in several posts, and is the key in molding the character (gathi); see, “The Law
of Attraction – Habits, Character (Gathi), Cravings (Āsavas)“, and other related posts.
§ Dopamine (and other good chemical) production is enhanced by omega 3 and other good foods,
and exercise, including interval running.
§ Exercise and meditate! It will keep you healthy and alert; see, “‘Spark’ by John Ratey” for
information on the value of a good exercise program.
9. Furthermore, it is clear that we are not programmed by our genes, environment, or even our
past kamma, even though all these can affect our destiny. The most powerful is our mind, i.e.,
citta niyama can even dominate kamma niyama.
§ As the saying goes, “you can do anything that you put your mind to”. This is the true basis
of free will.
10. Even though the scientists are making some progress regarding the mind, brain is not the mind,
just as the physical eye is not the cakku pasada rūpa; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“, and
other related posts. Yet it is essential to keep the physical eye (and other physical sense faculties) as
well as the brain in good condition for the whole body and the mind to work properly.
REFERENCES
Next, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific View“, …………………
1. We are lucky to be in an age when many of the Buddha’s teachings are not only confirmed but also
strongly supported with additional evidence that were not possible during the time of the Buddha.
§ This is another instance where the evidence is coming from research on the workings of the
brain.
2. The Buddha basically said to follow the following procedure to break a bad habit and to instill a
good habit:
i. understand the reasons why a certain habit is bad,
ii. stop engaging in activities that enhances the habit,
iii. deviate the mind from such bad activities by focusing on opposing good activities,
iv. contemplate on the “release” or “cooling down” that has already resulted by following the
above procedure,strengthen the resolve to stay on course, and keep doing (i) through (iii).
With time, the bad habit(s) will go away and the good habit(s) will take hold. There comes a time
when one will automatically follow this procedure; it becomes a “way of life”.
3. The reasoning behind is based on the key factors that we discussed in the previous posts; see, “The
Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)” and “Habits, Goals, and
Character (Gati or Gathi)“:
§ We do many things automatically (i.e., without being mindful or without deliberate thinking);
these are done via our habits that we formed during this life or even coming from previous
lives.
§ There are both good and bad habits. We want to keep and cultivate good habits and discard bad
habits.
§ Changing (cultivating) habits first require some “external adjustments” like one’s physical
environment, friends, etc and, more importantly, the four steps listed above.
4. Beginning in the early 1990’s or so, scientific investigations in several fields (effects of meditation
on the brain, behavioral studies on animals and humans, neurology, etc) have come to similar
conclusions.
§ We will discuss these in detail in the future, but here I want to just point out the main
similarities. Furthermore, discussing how the mechanism takes place in the brain provides an
alternative way to visualize these changes.
§ We are indeed fortunate to live at a time when we have evidence from science to provide
additional evidence.
5. As I pointed out in the posts on the manomaya kāya and and physical body, our physical body is
“prepared” by the kamma seed that was the cause for this life. But the manomaya kāya is constantly
making “adjustments” to the physical body based on the current status of the mind.
§ Many kamma vipāka are “built-in” even at the conception; some may be avoidable by taking
care of the body (exercise, food, etc), and the mind (contemplation, meditation, etc), but some
may not be avoidable because they are so strong: We will never know when a cancer, an
accident, or even a natural calamity can drastically change our lives; this is anicca, “the
inability to maintain our lives the way we would like to”.
§ Thus we need to spend at least sometime to work towards a meaningful solution to the
“problem of existence”.
§ Another factor we need to remember is that our “sansāric habits” are built-in to our brain. We
keep changing/adding such habits as we grow up, influenced by our family, friends, and the
society in general. Thus one’s “character” (gati; pronounced “gathi”) are in constant flux, either
by choice or influenced by the environment.
6. This is a key point: We need to make sure that we do not “go with the flow”, i.e., let past kamma or
our environment determine our future.
§ As humans, we have the capability to change our destiny. We DO HAVE free will, unlike an
animal. Since we do not know what our next existence is going to be, we need to make sure to
to get on the “right path” as soon as possible.
§ Even 100 years of this life is NOTHING compared to millions and billions of years life in
“unknown territory” in the future; thus we need to make use of this opportunity.
7. As we discussed in the “Truine Brain – How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits”,
only the humans have a developed neocortex, that makes possible ‘thinking, and decision making”.
The animals either do not have it, or have a primitive version of it.
§ Therefore, the animals basically only use the “mid brain” or the “limbic system”, where
decisions are made FOR THEM according to their ingrained habits that have evolved over
many, many lives (as we discussed, the physical body is formed based on the manomaya kaya).
The response from the limbic system is instantaneous, and the animals can only REACT to
external stimuli.
§ All sansāric habits are built-in to the limbic system, and the animals react according to the way
the limbic system is wired up; this may change some during growing up due to external
environment, but the main “character qualities” (gati) do not change very much. That is why
you see adorable dogs as well as vicious dogs. Even our pets have “a personality”.
§ We can change their personalities by teaching them things, but they are unable to do it on their
own. It is easier to “teach” more evolved animals like monkeys because they have a bit of a
neocortex.
8. But we humans have a neocortex that is well-developed and is capable of much more than we
normally believe it to be capable of. It is this neocortex that makes us, humans, different from
animals (actually, it is more accurate to say that “our current bhava” is superior to an “animal
bhava”).
§ Even though we also REACT first, especially to a threatening stimuli, our “thinking brain”
starts to kick in quickly, especially with training. Many people get into trouble because they are
“REACTIVE”, i.e., they do not try to develop the habit of using the “thinking brain”.
§ But we can be PROACTIVE. We can teach ourselves to “take corrective actions” even if we do
some things on impulse. Even if the initial reaction to a sudden temptation is to “take it and
enjoy it” or “hit him” or “kill that annoying dog”, we can always take a breath, stop ourselves,
and think about the consequences of such actions. This is what we call “mindfulness”.
§ Some people are more proactive than others even at birth (via sansāric habits). Some people
change from being reactive to proactive or other way around even without knowing due to the
particular environment they grow up in.
§ The key point is that we can WILLFULLY change from being reactive to proactive; we all are
reactive at least to some stimuli: the one’s we have “taṇhā” for! In other words, we like to get
attached to certain things and like to dislike other things with PASSION; see, “Taṇhā – How
we Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance”.
9. In terms of science the key is in the neurons in the brain, and how we can train our neocortex to
fire the right sets of neurons more frequently. The “frontal lobes” of the neocortex is the command
center for brain activities.
§ The frontal lobes can be visualized as the boss. If it is a lazy boss, it will just assign duties to
the limbic system to carry out things “as usual”.
§ But if the boss is energetic and always looking for ways to “improve things”, then it will start
investigating new approaches. And once better approaches are found, it will get them “hard
wired” and they will essentially become the “new limbic system”.
§ This is the key to “developing a new you” by discarding bad habits and developing good habits.
Essentially you need to get the frontal lobes to be an active, energetic boss for the brain.
10. Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz is a psychiatrist specializing in treating Obsessive Compulsive Disorders
(OCD), and has pioneered in using “habit makeovers” to treat OCD. He has written several books,
but I highly recommend the two books, “The Mind and the Brain” and “You are not Your Brain”.
He has developed a “Four Step” method to change one’s habits that give rise to OCD:
1. Identify the problem area.
2. Recognize the need to change.
3. Deviate from automatically “going along” with old ways and re-direct attention to “new paths”.
4. Re-assess the situation, and keep working on accelerating the process.
11. He has kept records of brain scans of his patients which clearly show the improvements in the
brain with time, and of course most patients are able to get rid of their compulsive behavior.
§ The key is to slow down the “firing of neurons” associated with a bad habit and to increase the
firing of neurons associated with an opposing good habit.
§ There is a rule called Hebb’s rule that says, ‘neurons that fire together, wire together”. The
more one keeps doing a certain activity, a set of neurons start to fire together and that neural
connection gets stronger by the day. It is just like strengthening one’s arm by “doing more
liftings” with it.
§ In the same way, when one is decreasing the use of a certain activity, the set of neurons
allocated for that activity gets weaker, fewer neurons participate, and eventually it loses being a
habitual act.
12. Here is a figure from Dr. Schwartz’s book, “The Mind and the Brain” (p. 362), that illustrates the
“re-wiring” of a new network in the brain and the concomitant weakening of a network for an
undesirable habit :
1. We all are impressed by the scientific advances made during the past 100 years or so making our
lives easier and more productive. I am actually a cheerleader for scientific and technological
advances.
§ Physics had been my passion since high school days, and that changed when I started learning
Buddha Dhamma several years ago. I still love and work on topics of interest in physics (and
science in general). Fortunately, I am finding that those two interests are not mutually
exclusive, and there is significant overlap. In fact, this section is the result of my two
overlapping interests.
2. The following posts discuss cases where current theories of science are not consistent with Buddha
Dhamma. I believe that science will recognize the primary nature of the mind in the future, and will
discard the current notion that the mind (consciousness) arises out of inert matter.
§ Neuroscience says there is no Free Will? – That is a Misinterpretation!
3. Despite the advances in science and technology, there is much about the human mind that science
does not understand, and has not even begun to understand. Western science is based on the five
physical senses, leaving out the most important one, the mind.
§ At the present time, in 2016, scientists have the wrong view that consciousness originates in the
brain.
§ All scientific theories relating to the mind are based on this wrong hypothesis. However,
Buddha Dhamma says not only that mind is a sense of its own, but it is the most powerful of all
six senses.
Here is a post from the Abhidhamma section that has a deeper analysis on the brain-mind connection:
Brain – Interface between Mind and Body
5.6.1 Neuroscience says there is no Free Will? – That is a
Misinterpretation!
1. In 1983, Benjamin Libet conducted an experiment that apparently showed that our brain makes
decisions before we become aware of it. When a person moves a finger, the brain activity appears to
start before the person actually makes that decision.
§ There have been numerous experiments conducted since then, and all experiments seem to
confirm this observation, even though the time delays vary.
§ People are quite puzzled and some are very worried that we are just zombies run by a program
in our brain.
2. Here is a video clip that illustrates the basic experiment:
WebLink: VIMEO: Neuroscience and Free Will
Here is a recent youtube video on the same subject:
WebLink: Youtube: Do humans truly have Free Will?
3. Scientists and philosophers have been debating whether these experiments show that man has no
free will:
WebLink: WIKI: Neuroscience of free will
4. The second recent experiment is a bit more refined. Let us summarize that experiment:
§ The person randomly decides (no pre-planning) press a button at some time (let us take this
time to be TM -M for the mind- making the decision)
§ He presses the button, the time of which is recorded electronically: TF (F for using the finger to
press the button).
§ At the same time that he decides to press the button, he is watching the clock and makes a
mental note of the “time” and after hitting the button, records that time too: TE (E for using the
eye to see the time on the clock. It is important to note that TE is the time that the MIND says it
saw the clock).
§ Finally, his brain activity is recorded by the sensors attached to his head, and let us take the
recorded start of brain activity to be TB.
Here is a summary from the researchers (you can click on the figure to expand and then hit the back
button on the browser to get back):
So, the researchers conclude that since brain activity started at TB before, either (i) him pressing the
button (at time TF) , or (ii) him recording the “clock” at the time TE when he made the decision,
the brain activity started before he made the decision.
§ The problem is that they ASSUME that the time, TE, that one gets off the clock is the same
as the time, TM, that the mind makes the decision to press the button.
5. In Buddha Dhamma, mind is the precursor to every action that we do with the body, and gets the
brain to it. The brain is the control center for the mechanical body to carry out both these tasks
ASSIGNED BY THE MIND. The brain gets the finger to push the button and the physical eye to
look at the watch.
§ Now the mind is in the manomaya kāya and is lined up with the heart of the physical body;
the mind and the brain are connected by signal system that is analogous to how television
or radio signals are transmitted (possibly electromagnetic; that is very fast). The brain
communicates with the five senses via the nervous system, and those communications are
slower.
§ Thus the brain gets the message from the mind to “press the button” and to “watch the
clock”. Thus TB is ALWAYS later than TM.
§ Modern science has shown that, “It normally takes 0.4 – 0.6 seconds for the nervous system to
activate available muscle motor units to contract,……”. (see, at the very end of the article:
WebLink: WIKI: Motor control). The finger movement involves muscles in the arm, and the
eye movement involves muscles in the head and the eye).
§ Both actions of “watch the clock” and “press the button” are initiated by the brain per mind’s
instructions via the central nervous system: The eye function circuitry can be logically thought
to be a bit faster than the mechanical finger moving. Thus “watching clock” gets done first with
the eye, and a little time later the finger has pushed the button. So, here is the time sequence per
Buddha Dhamma (you can click on the figure to expand and then hit the back button on the
browser to get back):
6. Any function of the body is controlled by the mind; here it is the mind that starts off the brain
activity, i.e., TB is later than TM (the brain activity starts after the mind decides to take action
because the brain needs to get the signal from the mind – located close to the heart- via the central
nervous system).
§ Now the brain needs to carry out those two functions of pressing the button and look at the
clock: since the vision circuitry is faster it gets done first; the mechanical movement of the
fingers is slower and that gets done a bit later.
7. Now, let us go back to the first experiment. The only difference there is that the person is not
recording the time. He just presses the left or right button. So, there are just two events recorded now
instead of three events. All we have to do is to remove TE from the above two graphs.
§ It is simpler: His mind decides to push the button; the mind directs the brain to push either the
left or right finger; and it takes some time for the brain to mobilize the muscles to move the
finger. So, the time sequence is the same as in the same figure: mind decides (TM), brain starts
working on it (TB) and the sensors attached to his head record that brain activity (wiggly line),
and finally the finger pushes the button (TF).
§ As in the other experiment, the mistake is to assume that finger pushing happens
SIMULTANEOUS with the mind’s decision. But the mind only gets the brain (the computer)
to initiate the complex sequence of events to work the muscles in the arm and hand to move the
finger, and that is the lag time.
8. The body is like a mechanical instrument, say, a sophisticated tank that is used to fire at the distant
object. The operator is like the mind. He aims the gun barrel using sophisticated circuitry, and then
fires the gun. He can drive the tank where ever he wants. But things do not, and cannot, happen
simultaneous with the operators decision; the gun needs to be moved into position before firing.
§ The mind is controlling the body just like that. The finger (and the eye) in the above case(s) are
just two instruments helping with the two tasks of pressing the button (and reading the clock),
and the brain is the “control center” that oversees both those activities on the command of the
mind.
§ The connection between the body and the mind is explained in the post, “Brain – Interface between
Mind and Body” and other posts on the gandhabba.
9. The mind is in the manomaya kāya (also called gandhabba); the brain is “computer-like” and
controls the physical body on the instructions given by the mind. At death, the manomaya kāya with
the mind leaves the body and both the body and the brain become lifeless; see, “Ghost in the Machine
– Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, “Manomaya Kāya and the Physical Body“, and “Manomaya
Kāya and Out-of-Body (OBE) Experience“.
§ Therefore, it is clear that we are not robots controlled by a program running in our brain. The
brain is just a sophisticated mechanical instrument that helps the mind with coordinating the
tasks (like the computer in the tank in the above example that is helping the tank operator). But
there are certain functions like breathing that the brain carries out without an input from the
mind. We will discuss those in an upcoming post soon.
§ Any person has the POTENTIAL to do things in a scale that is unimaginable to us. We just do
not realize the power of our minds; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Introduction“, and the
follow-up posts.
Next, “Quantum Entanglement – We Are All Connected“, …….
5.6.2 The Double Slit Experiment – Correlation between Mind and Matter?
1. The failure of a materialistic approach to explain consciousness (i.e., attempts to explain mental
phenomena arising from a brain that is composed of inert matter) is becoming ever more apparent;
see Refs. 1 and 2 below.
2. A number of scientists/philosophers are hoping that quantum mechanics can come to the rescue
(Ref. 3,4). They say that even though deterministic Newtonian mechanics is unable to explain
consciousness, quantum mechanics can, because quantum mechanics does not have such an apparent
deterministic nature.
3. Quantum mechanics (QM) is different from other branches of physics where one can get the
intuitive idea of what is taking place. What we do with QM can be called a “black box” approach:
when we apply the correct equations, we get the right results. Einstein did not like this at all. Yet, to
his frustration, all his predictions of the inadequacy of QM did not materialize AND the predictions
of QM have been correct to an amazing accuracy.
4. Those experiments, the results of which can only be explained by QM, APPEAR to be non-
deterministic in nature; this has compelled some scientists to investigate whether there is a
connection between QM and the mind, which IS non-deterministic. Two experiments in particular
have been at the forefront of these discussions: the “double-slit experiment” and the “Schrödinger’s
cat experiment”.
5. My intent in this essay is to challenge the two prominent assumptions on this postulated
relationship between QM and the mind:
i. Even if QM and the mind are non-deterministic in their own rights, there is no special reason to
believe that there is an apparent connection between them, and
ii. There is nothing really “non-deterministic” about QM, other than the indeterminacy depicted
by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; that is just on the accuracy of a given measurement.
6. Let us look into (i) first. Henry Stapp is a leading physicist who argues that quantum theory will
ultimately provide an explanation for consciousness. In his book, “Mindful Universe” he says (p.2),
“… quantum theory itself is intrinsically psychophysical as designed by its founders, and as used in
actual scientific practice, it is ultimately a theory about the structure of our experience that is erected
upon a radical mathematical generalization of the laws of classical physics”.
§ My basic point is that quantum theory is NOT psychophysical; there is no way to accommodate
“subjectivity” in QM. Where is the “mind connection” in the theory of QM?
§ There are others who work on theories that try to explain consciousness as arising from
quantum effects in the brain; see, for example, “Conversations on Consciousness”, by Susan
Blackmore (2006). No one has clarified how these theories make the connection between
“psyche” and “physical” in “psychophysical”.
7. Let us review one experiment that has become the main demonstration for the “observer effect” in
QM, the “double-slit experiment”. Here is a short video by Dr Quantum to illustrate the “paradox” of
the double slit experiment:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Dr Quantum Double Slit Experiment
8. The two main points of this experiment are:
a. the particles behave like waves when both slits are open, and
b. this “wave nature” goes away when the path of the particle is “observed” or monitored.
9. There is a version of QM called the Bohmian theory or the Pilot Wave theory that was developed
by the late David Bohm. It does use the Schrodinger’s equation which is used to track the
propagation of a “pilot wave”, and the theory is explicitly nonlocal, i.e., quantum entanglement is
built-in. With this theory, each solution of the wave equation describes a DETERMINISTIC path for
the particle, and statistical average agrees with the experiments and the results of the standard QM
calculations.
§ The actual trajectories have been harder to measure not because of a “mind effect”, but because
an observation can disturb the particle trajectory itself. Recent experiments have been
conducted to “weakly” measure a system without appreciably disturbing the trajectories, and
have been shown to be consistent with the predictions of Bohmian theory (Ref. 5).
Thus the role played by Bohmian mechanics in these “QM experiments” is just like role statistical
mechanics played in thermodynamics.
Here is a very short video of the INDIVIDUAL trajectories for a double-slit experiment calculated
using the Bohmian theory. There is nothing “mysterious”: each particle has a definite trajectory;
quantum aspects comes via the “guiding wave”:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Bohmian Trajectories in the Double-Slit Experiment
§ When it is attempted to observe the path of an individual particle, the coherence of the system
or the pilot wave is disturbed and the interference pattern goes away. Thus there is no “observer
effect”, in the sense of bringing “subjectivity” in.
10. Another famous experiment that has been the subject of much discussion is the “Schrödinger’s
cat” thought experiment. This experiment suggested by Schrödinger back in 1935, involves a cat in a
closed chamber. A radioactive sample in the chamber, if undergoes decay within a given period of
time, triggers the release of a hammer that breaks a vial of a toxic gas that kills the cat. If conscious
observation is required to collapse the wave function, then the fate of the cat is not known until the
box is opened. Unfortunately, both the consciousness-based and consciousness-free interpretations of
quantum measurement are indistinguishable to the observer outside the box.
§ In 2006, an actual experiment was conducted to simulate this experiment. It was reported that,
“…measurement alone, rather than conscious observation of a measurement, is sufficient”; see
Ref. 6.
11. Thus there is no real “observer effect” in the double slit experiments or in the Schrödinger cat
experiment.
§ In the double-slit experiment, what an “observer” does is to disturb the coherence of the
system, if the disturbance is strong. It does not matter whether the “observer” is human or a
mechanical device (in most cases it is non-human); one ALWAYS gets the same result. This is
in contrast to real subjective situations, like in the stock market, where complex subjective
decisions are made by thousands of people.
§ So, where does the “objectivity” or “intention” – in the sense of the mind affecting the
experimental result – comes from? “Intent to monitor” is not really a significant subjective
decision; just a simple “yes” or “no”.
12. Therefore, it is clear that there was no evidence for “subjectivity” in those experiments even
before Bohmian mechanics or the Schrödinger’s cat experiment; those two pieces of evidence really
make that point undeniable. There is no evidence of the mind affecting the outcomes of those
experiments.
13. Even though mind affects matter and even CREATE matter, science has not advanced enough yet
to confirm that. There has to be a paradigm change: any theory based on matter and attempt to treat
mental phenomena as a byproduct will not succeed. Mind is the more fundamental entity; mind takes
precedence over matter.
§ Some philosophers are beginning to sense this reality. Even though he does not appear to know
anything about Buddha Dhamma, philosopher Thomas Nagel says: “The great advances in the
physical and biological sciences were made possible by excluding the mind from the physical
world…..But at some point it will be necessary to make a new start on a more comprehensive
understanding that includes the mind”. (Ref 1, p.8). Then on p. 15, “…The possibility opens up
of a persuasive conception of the natural order very different from materialism – one that makes
mind central, rather than a side effect of physical law”.
Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics
March 13, 2018: I have started a new section “Quantum Mechanics and Dhamma“, where a new
interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented, and it is discussed why a connection between
quantum theory and consciousness will not be possible.
References
1. In 1988, Dee Fletcher almost died due to carbon monoxide poisoning. Her husband found her
unconscious just in time to save her life. However, when she recovered, she had lost “sight” in the
normal sense of word.
§ She could not see and recognize someone standing right in front or read a book.
2. But soon it was realized that she had some peculiar abilities. She could grab a pencil from the hand
of a person who held it in front of her, even though she could not actually “see” the pencil or the
person.
§ Her vision is good enough for picking something up, but not good enough for seeing it!
Since then researchers have done numerous experiments on her, that have led to some astonishing
findings about how vision works.
§ For example, they tested her with a mailbox with a narrow slit for inserting letters. Even though
she could not see the mailbox — let alone the slit or the envelope — she could insert the letter
in the slot without any effort. Even when they tilted the slit, she did not have a problem at all! It
was as if a phantom inside her was doing that task for her.
3. Another ability of Dee was to be able to walk around the house without bumping into furniture or
walls. Since that ability could be due to her familiarity with the house, they took her to an unfamiliar
trail and she did not have any problem walking there without tripping over rocks or bumping into
trees.
§ This disorder is known as visual agnosia.
§ It turns out that there are two relatively independent visual systems in the brain: One for
conscious perception (visual cortex), which was severely damaged in Dee. The other was for
unconscious control of action (superior colliculus), which is largely preserved.
4. A figure of the optical nerve splitting into those two areas in the brain is shown below.
colliculus was left mostly intact. Her eyes were sending the signals to the visual cortex, but the
damaged visual cortex could not process that signal.
§ By the way, you do not need to know the details of visual cortex, superior colliculus, or any
other technical term to get the idea that I plan to convey. I do not know details about them
either.
6. Of course, scientists are only aware that those two areas in the brain contribute to those two
functions. They do not know exactly how the visual cortex gleans information about what the object
is (i.e., its visual characteristics) OR how the superior colliculus figures out the dimensions of the
object and how far it is at (in order to correctly grab an item both types of information are needed).
§ We need to realize that there is “no light” going to the visual cortex and there is no screen at the
back of the head that displays the object in question. The optical nerve only transmits a
chemical (and electrical) signal. The visual cortex somehow generates a “picture” for our
mind to see.
§ Even more mysterious is how the superior colliculus figures out the depth of vision just from
that chemical signal coming through the optical nerve.
§ We will come back to these issues in upcoming posts, but first let us continue with our
discussion on what the scientists know at this time and how they found them.
7. There are many research papers that describe experiments involving Dee Fletcher, and the two
principal researchers have written a book on this research: “Sight Unseen – An Exploration of
Conscious and Unconscious Vision” by M. A. Goodale and A. D. Milner (2004).
§ The above book is a bit expensive. A less detailed account is given in Chapter 4 of V. S.
Ramachandran’s popular book, “Phantoms in the Brain” (1998), which is relatively
inexpensive. He is a neurosurgeon and has discovered some other interesting findings about the
brain that are also described in this book. We will discuss a couple of those observations
(particularly his and others’ work on “phantom limbs”) in future posts.
§ There is also a Wikipedia article on the WebLink: WIKI: Two-streams hypothesis on vision.
8. The visual problem that is the opposite of that of Ms. Fletcher has also been observed, as described
in the book by Goodale and Milner. This syndrome is called the “optic ataxia“, and those who have it
can “see” and recognize objects very well; but they have difficulty in actions involving objects.
§ Those who suffer from optic ataxia, for example, can see the mail box and the slit described in
#2 above. However, they have much difficulty in putting a letter through the slit.
§ It turns out that these people have their superior colliculus damaged, but the visual cortex
works fine.
9. Have you thought about how we can move around without bumping into each other and other
objects like trees on the ground and cars on the road? The presence of the two processing streams can
BEGIN TO explain how the brain figures out not only “what is in front of us (a human, tree, or a
car)” but also “how far is it at and how big it is”.
§ As mentioned above, part of the signal going through the optical nerve to visual cortex deals
with the first task and the other part going to the superior colliculus deals with the “haw far and
how big” issue.
10. Even though scientists have figured out that those two areas in the brain (visual cortex and the
superior colliculus) somehow extract the two kinds of information, they have absolutely no idea
how those areas extract that information from the chemical signal that comes through the
optical nerve.
§ Scientists do know that the lens in an eye projects an image of the object to the back of the eye
(retina); see the figure above. It is pretty much the same as an image you can see with a lens:
11. Of course, the film in an old camera undergoes some chemical changes when the image falls on it.
Then that film is chemically processed to reveal the picture.
§ In the same way, when the image of an object falls on the retina of an eye, the cells on the
retina generate a chemical (and electrical) signal. This signal is the one that is transmitted by
the optical nerve to the visual cortex and the superior colliculus in the brain. There is no picture
transmitted to the brain.
§ So, how does the visual cortex generates a visual of the object starting with the chemical signal
that comes from the eye?
§ Even more puzzling is how the superior colliculus figures out the distance to the object (and the
dimensions of the object), solely based on that same signal.
12. Even within the visual cortex itself, there are 30 different areas specialized to carry out different
tasks in order to make a “comprehensive picture” of the object.
§ For example, the area called V4 deals with the color of the object, but does not care about the
direction of motion.
§ On the other hand area MT (also called V5) responds to targets in the visual field based on their
direction of motion, but does not care about the color of the object. Thus there are multiple
tasks done even within the visual cortex by specialized sub-areas.
13. Thus it is clear that the brain is indeed a very sophisticated machine! However, as we will find out
in upcoming posts, it is not a typical machine like a computer. It can change on its own!
§ While a computer cannot get rid of parts that go bad, the brain can indeed replace or repair bad
parts and even make new parts in some cases (however, when a whole section is damaged, like
in the case of visual cortex or superior colliculus such a rejuvenation is not possible). This is
what is puzzling the neuroscientists right now. They have confirmed that these things
happen (I will discuss examples in future posts), but have no idea HOW the brain does
that.
§ The key to this puzzle is that the physical body is actually controlled by our “mental body” or
the gandhabba. The gandhabba has three components: kammaja kaya, cittaja kaya, and the
utuja kaya. It is actually the cittaja kaya that plays the dominant role in CHANGING brain
functions. In other words, it is OUR THOUGHTS that can change the brain!
§ Ultimately, one attains Nibbāna by gradually transforming one’s own brain. In other words,
getting rid of greed, hate, and ignorance can change one’s brain! However, even a Buddha can
only show how it is done, and one has to make the effort.
§ The four types of bodies that we have and the gandhabba are discussed in the section
“Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“. The key functions of the cittaja kaya are also discussed in the
post, “Udayavaya Ñāṇa – Importance of the Cittaja Kaya“.
14. We live in a truly opportune time to comprehend the value of Buddha Dhamma. Modern science
is providing clues that can be used with Buddha Dhamma to clarify many issues. I believe that
Buddha Dhamma is able to guide scientists (and philosophers) in their quest to answer many issues.
§ In this series of posts, I hope to suggest some such avenues for scientists to explore, based on
Buddha Dhamma, which can also explain many of these “new findings”.
§ As I have mentioned many times, these details are not needed to attain Nibbāna. However, for
most people, future confirmation of such “predictions” hopefully will help build confidence in
Buddha Dhamma, and to appreciate its value.
§ Of course the real value of Buddha Dhamma is not in exposing such mundane things, but
showing the path to liberation from suffering (Nibbāna). But it is good to have faith in Buddha
Dhamma, so that one can feel confident that one is not wasting one’s precious time in learning
Buddha Dhamma.
It is a good idea for anybody to read the first section, because the basic ideas and fundamentals are
described in that section.
o First Section: Moral Living and Fundamentals
§ Subsection: The Basics
· “The Pale Blue Dot……..”
· “The Law of Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)”
· “Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi)”
· “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis”
· “First Noble Truth – A Simple Explanation of One Aspect”
§ Subsection: Calming the Mind
· “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances”
· “Solution to a Wandering Mind – Abandon Everything?”
· “Right Speech – How to avoid Accumulating Bad Kamma”
· “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?”
· “Need to Experience Suffering in Order to Understand It?”
· “Does Impermanence Lead to Suffering?”
§ Subsection: Buddha Dhamma and Buddhism
· “A Buddhist or a Bhouddhaya?”
· “Where to Start on the Path?”
· “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream”
· “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)”
· “Buddhism without Rebirth and Nibbāna?”
§ Subsection: Dhamma Concepts
o The Basics
§ “The Pale Blue Dot……..”
§ “The Law of Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)”
§ “Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi)”
§ “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis”
§ “Four Noble Truths: Recipe for Problem Solving”
§ “First Noble Truth – A Simple Explanation of One Aspect”
§ “Difference between a Wish and a Determination (Paramita)”
o Calming the Mind
§ “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances”
§ “Solution to a Wandering Mind – Abandon Everything?”
§ “Right Speech – How to avoid Accumulating Bad Kamma”
Even if some of us are not thinking about a “wider world view” or “what happens after death”, all of
us want a better world for all of us.
I thought of sharing this marvelous video from the late Dr. Carl Sagan:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Carl Sagan - Pale Blue Dot
When I read the writings of all those past scientists like Sagan, Feynman, Einstein, Bohm,
Heisenberg, etc, I wonder how much more they could have accomplished spiritually if they were
exposed to pure Buddha Dhamma. Yet, I am still impressed by their pure reasoning and compassion
for the humanity; they were not just scientists with a narrow focus. They thought deeply about the
“purpose of existence”.
Even though science has revealed the unimaginable vastness of space, it has not yet even approached
the “depth of time for existence”. Not only is our place in the vast cosmos insignificantly small, our
individual existence of about 100 years (in this life) is insignificantly small too.
§ Yet, out of countless beings that live on this Earth, we are the only species that is capable of
forging our own destiny.
§ We need to be mindful not only of the welfare of family and friends, but for all other people
and beings (seen and unseen).
Do you know why some actions are good and others bad? We may quote some ethical maxims or
juggle with philosophical abstractions, but there is a very simple explanation that is called nature:
“Good is good because it leads to happiness and freedom of the heart. Bad is bad because it leads to
suffering, and it feels bad”. The Buddha said a moral deed (puñña kamma) is one that makes one’s
heart “pulsating with joy”; an immoral deed leads to a burdened heart.
Nature encourages morality and punishes immorality via its built-in reward-punishment system,
which is none other than the laws of kamma. But the punishment is not immediate, and that is why it
is hard for people to make the connection. Even if the punishment in question comes a few lives later,
this “time lag” is really not that long since saṃsāra is “beginning-less” and “endless”.
Humans innately know what is right and what wrong. Most bad actions are committed with a mind
that is not calm, but is agitated. Therefore, we need to learn how to calm our minds: “Key to Calming
the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
By the way, Dr. Sagan’s books like “Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space”, “The
Varieties of Scientific Experience”, and “Billions & Billions: Thoughts on Life and Death at the
Brink of the Millennium” are very informative. These are likely to be available in local public
libraries.
Next, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“, ………..
6.1.1.2 The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings
(Asavas)
1. The saying, “Birds of a feather flock together”, is true and we can see that all around us.
§ We can put people into various categories: sportsmen/sportswomen, thieves, politicians,
murderers, church goers, environmentalists, liberals, conservatives, etc.
§ In a school, kids tend to get in to different groups too: those who play sports, like partying,
nerds, geeks, etc.
§ Of course, there may be some overlaps, but we can clearly see people tend to socialize with
those who have common interests, likings, etc.
2. This is a universal principle. A basic rule in chemistry is that “like molecules” stay together.
§ We all know that oil and water do not mix together; the two molecules are very different. On
the other hand, water molecules (or oil molecules) stay together happily.
3. Buddha Dhamma describes laws of nature. So it is not surprising that the law of attraction comes
naturally out of Dhamma. There are three key words in Dhamma that are relevant: habits, character
(gathi), and cravings (āsavas); see, “Habits and Goals, and Character (Gathi)“. Actually, some of the
habits we take from life-to-life, see, “Sansāric Habits, Character (Gathi) and Cravings (Āsava)”.
4. The law of attraction can be explained with Paṭicca Samuppāda, the principle of cause and effect in
Dhamma; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Introduction“.
§ “Pati + ichcha” means associate or bind with something one likes. “sama + uppāda” means
what results (uppāda) from that is something similar (sama) in kind; i.e., that association leads
to an outcome of the same kind.
§ If a child hangs out willingly and enthusiastically with others who like to work hard and enjoy
getting good grades, then the child will continue on that path to success. The more a child
willingly hangs out with a criminal gang, his mentality becomes more attuned to criminal
behavior, and becomes a criminal capable of doing atrocious crimes.
§ Thus, in Dhamma it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. We will see this
developed into a very deep meaning.
5. However, Dhamma says this law of attraction does not need to be fatalistic, i.e., one with a set of
bad habits/cravings does not have to go down a slippery slope. One CAN change those
habits/cravings GRADUALLY and thus change one’s character (gati).
However, a child is not capable of doing this on his/her own. That is why it is parents’ responsibility
to direct the child:
§ Parents can make a HUGE contribution in setting up good habits/cravings in a child starting
from the point of conception. The love and care the parent feel towards each other IS FELT by
the fetus. That is as important, perhaps more important, than the food consumed by the mother.
A child born into an environment of abuse or violence may develop life-long problems.
§ As the child grows, child’s behavior and habits are influenced HUGELY by the parents,
friends, and the school environment. It is the responsibility of the parents and teachers to guide
the child.
The reason is that the manomaya kāya of the child is aware of the surroundings even from the very
early stages, even though it does not have any control over the situation; thus it is affected by the
“environment”; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“.
6. When one becomes an adult, one has full control. Even if the child years were not good, and even
if one has acquired a set of bad habits (or even sansāric habits that have molded one’s character in
fundamental ways), it is POSSIBLE to change them.
§ One can use the same Paṭicca Samuppāda principle to change direction.
§ All one needs to do is to change the “pati+ichcha” part, i.e., to change one’s likings or habits.
Then “sama+uppāda” will happen automatically. That is nature’s law.
7. First, though, one needs to convince one’s own mind that the current path will lead to a bad
destiny; one needs to contemplate the bad consequences of staying on the same wrong path. AND
one also needs to contemplate the benefits of cultivating good habits.
For example, a smoker cannot just make a New Year resolution and stop smoking (a few can, but
most cannot). Instead, it is better first to look at all the medical evidence out there that show strong
evidence that one could die early, and also may be burdened in old age with lung problems if one
continued smoking. One could talk to someone who has given up smoking and listen to that person’s
“success story”, or think about not having to see the annoyance of those who are around when one
lights a cigarette, etc.
8. When one acquires “good habits” (initially slowly and with effort), one is attracted to people,
settings, work places, environments that further nurture and grow those habits, which in turn
change one’s character; thus the process becomes self-feeding once started. This is the law of
attraction as embedded in Paṭicca Samuppāda: “pati+ichcha” leading to “sama+uppada“.
§ Thus it is critical to develop a liking (chanda) and desire (citta) for what one wants to
accomplish, and to critically analyze the situation (vimansa), and make an effort (viriya); see,
“The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“.
§ When one embraces certain ways and activities (good or bad), those become habits. In Sinhala,
it is said that, “නිතර කරන ද ෙය ගති වෙනවා(ganna deya gathi venava)”. When one keeps
doing this over and over and possibly over numerous rebirths, they get deeply embedded as
deep-seated cravings (āsavās). Those gati (character) also become “bhava” as well; whatever
that is liked becomes one’s existence (bhava) or reality; in Sinhala, “තිබෙන බව (thibena
bhava)”).
§ When one has certain character (gati) it becomes easy to get into the corresponding “state” or
existence; this is one meaning of bhava. For example, one with a “drinking habit” is easy to be
“born” in that state, i.e., just the sight of a bar may cause that person to get drunk. This is the
concept extended in Buddha Dhamma: It is easy to be “born” with those characteristics in
a new birth (uppatti bhava) or even in daily activities (pavutti bhava). This a bit deeper
concept discussed in the paṭicca samuppāda section; see, for example, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca
Samuppāda“.
9. The problem many people run into is that they would like to change quickly and that does not
normally happen. Initial progress could be slow. However, when one gets traction, the process speeds
up. It is like trying to reverse the direction of a moving car: one needs stop going in the wrong
direction first. Then when one starts the car facing the right direction, it takes a little while to
accelerate and ramp up the speed. See, “Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi)“, and the links there.
Let us consider two examples:
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
598 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ If one wants to be a successful businessman, then one should try to “build up” habits that
business people have: knowledge of the particular business, learning relevant skills, hard work,
etc. THEN the law of attraction starts working and will pull one to others with similar interests
and environments or conditions automatically.
§ If a high-school kid wants to go to college, then he/she should make an effort to get into that
mindset: Spending more time deciding what kinds of subjects to study, and then get
“immersed” in it. The parent and teachers can make a big difference by encouragement and
guiding in the correct path.
§ If someone wants to attain “nirāmisa sukha” (see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is
Nirāmisa Sukha?“), one needs to spend some time and first learn the true Dhamma. As one
learns, one gets motivated to learn more, because one starts feeling the change in one’s
character (gathi).
In all cases, one will be attracting external influences (friends, other interests, etc.) conducive to that
effort automatically. AND one will lose some of the old influences too. Obviously, the ideal settings
for the above examples could be different from each other, but not contradictory. Before trying to
attain Nibbāna, a person with family responsibilities will need to fulfill those by making an income to
support the family; a child needs to study well and find good employment. If one does not have the
necessities of life (food, housing, clothing, and medicine) it is not possible to contemplate, let alone
meditate.
10. Finally, the law of attraction works in the sansāric rebirth process too.
§ Many are reborn to the same families, same geographic locations, etc (within the same
“bhava“; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“).
§ At the moment of death, one is automatically “pulled” to a “matching birth” according to one’s
kamma vipāka and also one’s habits and tendencies. One who has lived an immoral life is likely
get a similar outcome in the next life: one who “lives like an animal” is likely to become an
animal. One who lives like a “Deva” (a being devoid of hate) or a “Brahma” (a being devoid of
greed and hate), is likely to reborn a Deva, Brahma.
§ Thus by cultivating good habits and getting rid of bad habits, one CAN change the direction of
one’s current life (character) AND future lives too.
§ The best way to do this is to be mindful all the time. See the bad consequences of bad actions
and bad habits and avoid them; see the good consequences of good actions and good habits and
embrace them. At the very basic level this is what is stated in the Ānāpānasati, Satipaṭṭhāna,
and Sabbāsava suttas (taking in what is good and getting rid of what is bad).
11. Currently, there are several books written on the subject of the law of attraction and how one can
use certain procedures to attain goals, build relationships, etc. The Buddha described those and more
2500 years ago.
12. Many people think kamma is deterministic, for example if one is born to poverty that is
one’s destiny, but that is NOT the case. Kamma is not deterministic; see, “What is Kamma? – Is
Everything Determined by Kamma?“) The human mind is very powerful, and if used right (by
purifying it and then using it mindfully), the possibilities are endless: see, “Power of the Human
Mind – Introduction” and the two posts following that for more details.
1. As I mentioned before, Buddha Dhamma can be interpreted at three levels; see, “Foundation of
Dhamma“. But the key to making progress at ANY LEVEL is to get rid of bad habits and instill good
habits, because they mold one’s character even through the rebirth process.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 599
§ The Pāli (and Sinhala) word for character is “gati“ ගති). One’s character can be changed (for
good or bad) via changing one’s habits. These habits take deep roots when practiced over many
lives, and becomes deep-seated cravings (“āsavas“) that forms one’s character.
§ Some habits are harmless. For example, some people have the habit of shaking their legs while
sitting. It could be annoying to some, but it is not “morally wrong”, i.e., it is not one of the ten
defilements; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
§ But there are other habits, such as drinking, stealing, sexual misconduct, etc that are morally
wrong and do belong to the ten defilements. Generating greedy or hateful thoughts can be a bad
habit too. Some have a tendency to easily “flare up”.
§ Then there could some, like gambling, that could lead to immoral actions.
§ There are good habits too: giving, helping others, teaching, and being compassionate in general.
2. For someone at the highest level, the Sabbāsava Sutta explains how one can work towards
Nibbāna in a systematic way by developing good habits (“gati“) and removing āsavas; see “Key
Points from the Sabbāsava Sutta” under “The Sotāpanna Stage”.
3. Here we are going to look at it to see how those recommended steps can be used in the day-to-day
life, i.e., for a moral life. Those steps can be used to remove any bad habits, for example, from
alcohol or drug use, smoking, to eating too much.
§ They can also be used in achieving goals, say lose weight, getting rid of depression, or starting
a new business. Achieving goals require building good habits.
4. A habit is something one gets used to by repeating it over and over. Good habits make a life easier
to live with, and bad habits lead to bad results. Scientific studies have confirmed that our brains “can
rewire its connections” (plasticity of the brain), thus getting rid of bad habits and instilling good ones.
The trick is to “stick to a set procedure”. Many people give up before giving their brains enough time
to “rewire”; this is why many “New Year resolutions” go unfulfilled.
One way to remove bad habits is to look at the bad consequences of such habits; see, “The Law of
Attraction, Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“.
5. The seven steps in the Sabbāsava Sutta can be helpful for developing good habits for a moral life.
These steps basically convince the mind of the benefits of good habits/downside of bad habits and set
up a conducive environment.
The 7 steps in the Sabbāsava Sutta (interpreted conventionally or mundane or “padaparama”
interpretation):
1. Develop an understanding (learn all about the direct and indirect benefits, what is involved, the
best way to go about achieving the goal, etc)
2. Discipline (Avoid getting distracted by things that provide “temporary pleasures”, like a drug
addict thinking it is OK to “take a small puff” while working to be free of drugs).
3. Association (associate with knowledgeable people who can help and get to know other helpful
resources)
4. Patience and tolerance (being thoughtful and not being agitated or “shaken off” by small
inconveniences; having perseverance)
5. Avoidance (dissociating with people who have negative attitudes and avoiding unsafe places,
practices, etc.)
6. Removal (suppressing discouraging thoughts by contemplating on the long-term benefits of the
project)
7. Bhāvanā or “immersing in the project” (bhāvanā or meditation is constantly thinking about the
main objective; getting the mind to focus on it).
6. A careful overview of what one has in mind (the goal) is needed first. Just like one should not
undertake a journey without learning about the destination, the path, and the reason for the journey,
one needs a clear vision of the goal, how it can be beneficial to oneself and others (family, friends,
and even to the society), and the way to achieve it.
§ However, the steps are not to be followed sequentially. Once the overview is done and the
decision to undertake the project is made, all steps should be used as appropriate. For example,
the first and last items on the list (understanding and meditating) go hand-in-hand.
7. Those steps can be used by anyone to enhance the quality of life in general, a moral life with a
“peace-of-mind”. They are the sensible things to do.
§ For example, an important decision for anyone should be to live in a good area not prone to
crime, floods, etc. Associating with immoral or people with negative attitudes is always to be
avoided. Going out at inappropriate times, in inappropriate places, is just ‘asking for trouble”.
§ If one carefully goes through the list, it will be clear why all those steps make common sense.
If you would like to read about how these habits develop into deep-seated sansāric habits or
āsavas, see, “Sansāric Habits, Character (Gathi) and Cravings (Āsava)“. Also, “The Four Bases
of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“, can be helpful in achieving goals .
Next, “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis“, ……….
6.1.1.4 Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis
Revised November 27, 2017
§ However, after Galileo invented the telescope, people made more precision measurements of
the planets and the heliocentric model was needed to explain all those new findings.
2. But there are many people who still believe that the Sun goes around the Earth! To quote a passage
from the Wikipedia article, WebLink: WIKI: Geocentric model
§ “..Morris Berman quotes survey results that show currently some 20% of the U.S. population
believes that the sun goes around the Earth (geocentricism) rather than the Earth goes around
the sun (heliocentricism), while a further 9% claimed not to know. Polls conducted by Gallup
in the 1990s found that 16% of Germans, 18% of Americans and 19% of Britons hold that the
Sun revolves around the Earth. A study conducted in 2005 by Jon D. Miller of Northwestern
University, an expert in the public understanding of science and technology, found that about
20%, or one in five, of American adults believe that the Sun orbits the Earth. According to 2011
VTSIOM poll, 32% of Russians believe that the Sun orbits the Earth”.
§ And, there are even some who believe that the Earth is flat: WebLink: WIKI: Modern flat Earth
societies
3. Thus sometimes it is very hard to get rid of certain “wrong views” because of our “experiences”
and “gut feelings”. Yet, if one hangs onto such wrong views (in the face of contrary evidence) one
cannot get a correct world view. This is why we always need to “look at the big picture”; the “bigger
the picture”, the better it is. It is hard to see much details while walking on the ground, but one see a
whole lot better looking down from a helicopter.
§ Luckily, nowadays, we have the advantage of technology to confirm that the Earth is not flat
and that it moves around the Sun.
4. Similarly, it is very hard for many people to believe that humans could be reborn as animals. One
argument that was given in a book that refuted rebirth was that “..in that case, the human population
should not be changing, but we see an increase of the human population over the past centuries”.
Apparently, the author did not even consider that a human could be born an animal. Again, it is
matter of a very narrow world view. There are innumerable beings in this world and they can be born
in not only in the animal and human realms, but 29 other realms that we cannot see!
§ When Darwin presented his theory of evolution, it made a huge psychological impact on the
society, which was not ready to accept that humans evolved from animals. It is said that Darwin
did not publish his now-famous volume, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, until 1859, more than 20 years after he had first formulated his theory because he
knew that it would create an uproar.
5. The theory of evolution is only partially correct according to Buddha Dhamma; we will discuss
this in detail in the future. When conditions for a birth in certain realm are satisfied, the nature has
come up with many ways to make that birth take place.
§ Accepting the fact that human can be BORN in the animal realm is an even more shocking
thing to contemplate for many people. But we should not just go by our instincts, because the
world is much more complex than we perceive with our limited senses.
§ Even though we consider the life of an animal as “useless”, life is the most important thing in
the world even for the lowest worm. All living beings have craving to continue the life they
have, regardless of how pathetic it appears to us. Our “smelly bodies” are said to be repulsive to
the devas who have fine bodies that are free of diseases as well.
6. When the Buddha said, “..those who depart from the human realm, those will be reborn as humans
or devas can be compared to the few grains of sand that I pick up on my fingernail. Those who are
reborn in the lower four realms are exceedingly many, compared to the sand on this great Earth”, it
appears to most people as an exaggeration.
§ But as described in the post, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human
Realm“, modern science is slowly proving that indeed the number of living beings, just in the
animal realm, is unimaginably large, and that human population of about 7 billion is negligibly
small. There are more living beings in your backyard soil.
7. Of course we cannot see the beings in the other three lower realms. But, just because they are not
amenable to our senses, we cannot say they do not exist.
§ Human vision is restricted to an almost infinitesimal sliver of 400 to 700 nanometers in the
wavelength spectrum. Our ears can detect only 20 to 20,000 Hertz audio frequencies. Other
animals use their own “bands” above and below that. Human beings have one of the poorest
senses of smell of all the organisms on Earth., etc; see the book, “The Meaning of Human
Existence” by Edward O. Wilson, who is a leading biologist.
§ Another way to think about this is to contemplate on the fact that there are hundreds of TV or
radios broadcasts that can be “tapped into” by having a TV or a radio set to the right channel.
Just because we cannot “see” those electromagnetic waves with our eyes, we cannot say they
are not all around us. There are other living beings all around us with such fine bodies, we just
cannot see them.
§ We have only begun “see” other hidden parts of “our world” with the aid of science; see,
“Expanding “Consciousness” by Using Technology“.
8. Even though scientific progress has been impressive, it takes generations to move the “knowledge
base” forward; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction“.
§ On the other hand, by PURIFYING the mind, one can discern EVERYTHING that is of
importance within a lifetime; see, “Expanding “Consciousness” by Purifying the Mind“, and
the power of the mind in the posts starting with, “Power of the Human Mind – Introduction“.
§ That is how the Buddha knew about not only the existence of innumerable planetary systems in
the universe (many other examples are discussed in other posts), but also about the fact that this
life of about 100 years in insignificant in the rebirth process.
§ And there is compelling evidence for rebirth; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
9. Without the “correct view” of this world, we will be simply “groping in the dark”. When one has
only a narrow and blurred vision, one cannot move forward. If one believes that this is the only life
we have, then one could be making bad decisions, that could affect one’s future for billions of years
to come.
§ That is why it is worthwhile at least to examine the evidence of the “wider world view” of the
Buddha, where both space and time are infinite. While modern science has confirmed the
infinite extent of space, it has not yet “discovered” the fact that life does not end at physical
death; it is just the end of one insignificantly small sliver of the time span of a sentient being.
10. Most people think the First Noble Truth is about suffering in the sense of just physical or mental
suffering IN THIS LIFE; that is wrong. Those are RESULTS of past actions (kamma). But that
suffering is NOT what the First Noble Truth is about; it is about the FUTURE suffering that CAN
BE stopped.
§ The First Noble Truth is about the suffering that is hidden. It is the unavoidable suffering
for anyone in this cycle of rebirths, until one grasps the “correct world view”.
§ This is why the Buddha said, “my Dhamma has never been heard before”. It is hard to grasp
until one is willing to spend some time and examine the “bigger picture”. One should not just
go by one’s instincts, but rather by the facts.
11. This is also why “sammā diṭṭhi” or “correct view” comes first in both versions of the Eightfold
Path. Yes. There are two versions of the path: One is mundane (lokiya) and is easier to grasp. The
other is transcendental (lokuttara) and requires the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa or the Three
Characteristics of this world, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Before trying to comprehend the Tilakkhaṇa, it is imperative that one follows the mundane
eightfold path and removes all ten types of micchā diṭṭhi; they are discussed in “Maha
Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
§ When one starts understanding the validity of laws of kamma (i.e., deeds have consequences),
rebirth must be true, and there are other realms that we cannot see, one begins to embrace the
mundane version of sammā diṭṭhi.
12. With that sammā diṭṭhi, one realizes that it is not fruitful to: think immoral thoughts (micchā
sankappa), utter inappropriate speech (micchā vaca), do inappropriate things (micchā kammanta),
live an immoral life (micchā ajiva), to strive to achieve unfruitful things (micchā vayama), have an
immoral mindfulness (micchā sati), and thus get into an immoral state (micchā samādhi).
§ Even if we can “get away” from paying for misdeeds in this life, we will have to pay with
interest in the future lives. Similarly, any good deeds will be rewarded in future lives, if
not within this life itself.
§ Thus, with correct views or Sammā Diṭṭhi, one will be automatically following the mundane
eightfold path: sammā sankappa, sammā vaca, sammā kammanta, sammā ajiva, sammā
vayama, sammā sati, and thus get to sammā samādhi. It all starts with sammā diṭṭhi, or the
“correct views”.
13. It is not a world view that is amenable to our “experience”, because our sense faculties are limited
as we discussed above. But as we make progress, our minds will become clear and we WILL be able
to see for ourselves the true nature of this world.
§ There is a lot of evidence that what the Buddha said about “the wider world” 2500 years ago
are indeed true. We are lucky to be born at the time when efforts of many generations of
scientists have confirmed many of his world views, and that should give us confidence (saddhā)
to take those views serious enough to spend some time examining the evidence. My goal is to
present evidence from many aspects, because different people comprehend different aspects.
14. Such a critical evaluation itself could be enough to dispel any wrong views. It is like lifting of a
fog and being able to see clearly. When the mind becomes pure, one does not need “evidence from
science” to confirm the worldview of the Buddha.
§ The lokuttara version of Sammā Diṭṭhi (which requires the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa to
some extent) and the corresponding Noble Eightfold Path is discussed in other posts in the
“Seeking Nibbāna” section. Also, see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and the post referred to
in that chart: “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
Next, “Four Noble Truths: Recipe for Problem Solving“, …
6.1.1.5 Four Noble Truths: Recipe for Problem Solving
§ Knowing what kind of end result can be expected by solving the problem (there may be many
possible outcomes depending on the approach).
§ A procedure to systematically solve the problem based on the superficial or root causes.
2. Let us discuss several examples. If a car would not start, the cause may not be clear to someone
who does not have a technical background in automobiles, but a qualified technician will be able to
find the cause quickly.
§ He may find that it is a simple problem of some wires becoming loose in the ignition circuit, or
it could be as bad as a problem with the engine itself.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
604 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ The solution of the problem will lead to being able to start the car.
§ And the way to get there depends on the actual problem and going through the standard
procedures to solve the problem. If the problem is with a loose wire, one could re-connect the
loose wires or just replace that circuit box. If it is a failed engine, one could either replace the
engine or if it is a minor problem with the engine, just fix that.
3. Sometimes figuring out the cause or even figuring out that there is a problem, may not be
obvious. If we get a headache, in most cases we would just take an aspirin or tylenol and that would
“fix it”.
§ But if the headache keeps coming back, then we may realize that there could be a more serious
root cause. Now we need to figure out why we are getting headaches frequently. First we look
at easy solutions. For example, if we can tie up the timing of the headaches to eating some kind
of specific food, we can stop eating that and see whether it goes away.
§ If we cannot figure it out, and if the problem persists, then we go to a specialist again, in this
case a physician. The physician will ask a series of questions and may do a series of tests. The
goal is to figure out what causes the headaches, the root cause.
§ The end result of solving the problem again is simple: to be free of headaches. But in the case
of recurring headaches, taking an aspirin is not a permanent solution.
§ Depending on results of the diagnostic tests, the physician may find the root cause to be a
cancer. Then that cancer needs to be treated, etc. He will prescribe a method of treatment. If
that root cause is removed, then we would have removed the recurring headaches.
§ Thus the correct way to solve a problem has four steps: correctly identifying the problem, find
its root causes, determine the outcome if the root causes are removed, and finding the best
procedure to handle the root causes.
4. But sometimes, when a problem arises we tend to do the most expedient thing to get it out of the
way and just move on. If the headache goes away until one gets through the day, then one may decide
to just take an aspirin and handle it day to day like that.
§ Even when the wife (or husband) says, “You have been taking aspirins almost every day for
this many days. Why don’t you see a doctor and see whether there is something else going
on?”, we may just continue with the “temporary fix” especially if we are busy.
§ If that person was starting to develop a cancer, then postponing the diagnosis of the “root
cause” could be a grave mistake. A cancer cell multiplies very rapidly, and could spread to
other areas of the body.
§ Even though one could get temporary relief by taking an aspirin daily (may be with gradually
increasing the dose too), that is NOT the solution. The end result in the short term could be
temporary relief, but one is moving into a much more dangerous outcome.
§ The ideal solution to the problem is not to be free from the headache temporarily, but to free
from the cancer!
5. We can solve many problems by ourselves by following the four step process. We may need a
qualified technician to find roots causes of car problems or may need the help of a physician to
diagnose the root causes for the recurring headaches as cancer.
6. The Four Noble Truths handle the most critical problem of all: the suffering associated with
existence.
§ First, most of us are not even aware that there is a problem. Unless one can see that there is a
rebirth process and that most of these rebirths are filled with unimaginable suffering, there is no
way to even know that there is a problem.
§ This problem of existence can be seen only by the highly-purified mind of a Buddha.
§ And he found the root causes, that permanent happiness (Nibbāna) results from removing the
root causes, and the procedure to do that.
§ However, one can find temporary solutions but just fixing the superficial causes. Just like fixing
the headache by taking an aspirin, one could find temporary happiness in this life by “trouble
shooting” each problem as it arises or even take precautionary measures to avoid problems.
One could even find a bit longer-term solution by working towards a better rebirth. But both
those are temporary solutions, achieved by fixing superficial causes, that are easily seen by any
intelligent human being.
7. Thus there is an important difference between superficial causes and root causes.
§ It is interesting to note that root causes gives the exact meaning as the Pāli term “mülika hetu“;
“mūla” is the root of a tree. If a tree is cut down or even the if the roots close to the surface are
removed, the tree may not be killed; it may still sprout new limbs and finally grow to a full
fledged tree.
§ However, removing the deep roots of a tree will permanently kill the tree. Similarly, removing
root causes will eradicate the problem completely.
8. In complex situations, the root causes of a given problem may not be obvious. And that means
the ideal solution may not be obvious.
§ When that happens, the problem leads to ever-increasing severity, and may not be solvable after
some point, as in the above case of ignoring the headaches for longer time will only lead to the
spread of the cancer and after some point, the cancer may not be treatable.
9. In the case of some possible problems that we can foresee, we do not need to wait until they
materialize. For example, all parents tell their kids to get a good education and then a good job, so
that those kids will not fall into hardships when they grow up. In that case, the solution is to get a
good job and the way to get there is to get a good education.
§ But getting a good job does not solve all possible problems: a young person getting a job knows
that one could come down with a deadly disease or lose the job in an unpredictable situation.
Here again, in terms of mundane reality, there are no perfect solutions. One could eat healthy
foods, engage in an exercise program, etc and also purchase health insurance and life insurance,
etc.
10. We should play out these scenarios in our heads. We can easily see that the four-step process can
solve any problem to varying degrees of success.
§ In all these situations, our goal is to “maintain things to our satisfaction”. We want our bodies,
and the bodies of our spouses and children, to function well and avoid any ailments or
discomfort. And we want our physical belongings (houses, cars, clothes, etc) to function well.
§ By following the above four-step process we can fulfil our desires to some extent. We can
evade certain problems by eating healthy, exercising, etc. We can get a car to last a long time
by doing the required maintenance. Still all these activities require effort, and this is a part of
the suffering that is not apparent (these are associated with saṅkhāra dukkha and viparinama
dukkha; see, “Introduction – What is Suffering?“.
§ This is because all we can do in those cases is to try to address some superficial causes.
§ But eventually, we WILL NOT be able to maintain our bodies to our satisfaction. No matter
how well we plan, there comes a time when our bodies start to degrade, even if we do not
encounter any major issues like cancer or alzheimer’s disease; this is part of the dukkha dukkha;
see, “Introduction -2 – The Three Characteristics of Nature“.
§ Yet, if we do not follow the four-step process in those mundane tasks, we will have much more
problems. Therefore, the first thing to do is to make sure one analyzes one’s day-to-day
activities and make sure to carefully analyze the problems one encounters (or even better to
anticipate future problems) and take necessary precautions.
11. However, tackling superficial causes that we can readily see or discern is what we have been
doing since the beginningless time. Life after life, we just strive to “maintain things to our
satisfaction”, and at ALL TIMES fail at least at the end.
§ Most times we suffer trying to “get things going in the way we want”, and by the time we
achieve at least some success, our bodies start falling apart, so that we will not be enjoying
what we have gained with so much effort.
§ Think carefully about any famous personality, whom we believe had achieved their life
goals.They all had to leave behind their achievements in many instance with tragic death, and
in their new life those things would not mean anything anyway; they have to start all over. The
only things that are carried over to the new life are any good/bad habits or deeds they had
cultivated, and not any material gains.
12. The key point that the Buddha was trying to make was that we do not realize that there is a
“problem of existence”, the first step in the four step process involving our existence. But since we
cannot readily see the rebirth process most of us focus on just this life.
§ All we have been doing is to “take aspirins” as headaches resurfaced, instead of finding a
permanent solution to the “problem of never-ending headaches”.
§ In each and every life so far, what we have done has been to “take aspirins” to try to solve
problems temporarily as they inevitably come our way.
§ This is the First Noble Truth of “ dukkha sacca” (pronounced “dukkha sachcha”). That
“existence in this world of 31 realms is filled with suffering, and it is never-ending process; but
that can be overcome permanently”.
13. If we understand how this never-ending process gets the required fuel from (or the root cause for
rebirths), then by ELIMINATING those causes we can solve the problem of perpetual suffering
permanently.
§ This cause of suffering is the second Noble Truth: “dukkha samudaya (where “samudaya” is
“san” + “udaya” where “udaya” means “to arise”) or how rebirth-fuelling “san” is the cause for
dukha. The Buddha analyzed this cause in detail and found that it is our attachment (taṇhā) to
“things in this world” due to our ignorance to fact that “anything in this world cannot be
maintained to our satisfaction” or anicca. Thus stated succinctly, the root cause for our
suffering is not realizing anicca.
§ Anicca leads to dukha (suffering), and thus one becomes anatta (helpless). Since this dukha can
be overcome, it is called dukkha, and thus we have the Three Characteristics of “this world of
31 realms”; see, “Anatta and Dukkha – True Meanings“.
§ Not understanding these three characteristics is called avijjā or ignorance.
14. Now the third step is to see that the successful solution to this problem is the attainment of
Nibbāna or stopping of the rebirth process. This is probably the hardest step to latch on to.
§ Our minds are setup not to “see” the suffering one is undergoing, but to contemplate on
“possible future happiness”. The Buddha likened this to the case of a cow dragging a fully-
loaded cart eagerly, when its owner is holding a stack of hay on a pole in front of it. The cow
has its mind set on reaching the stack of hay, and does not even realize the heavy load it is
pulling.
§ Even the lowest worm wants to live. It does not see the suffering that it goes through. This is
where one needs to spend a lot time trying to comprehend the message of the Buddha.
§ It is only when one truly comprehends that “it is fruitless to struggle to find happiness in this
world of 31 realms” that one attains the Sotāpanna stage. This is when one sees the truth in the
Third Noble Truth, the nirodha sacca: nirodha means “nir” + “uda” or stop the arising.
15. The Buddha said that when one sees one Noble Truth, one sees all four. Thus at the attainment of
the Sotāpanna stage, the way to Nibbāna also becomes clear.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 607
§ The process to remove the root causes of avijjā and taṇhā is the Fourth Noble Truth, the magga
sacca or the Truth of the Path, where “magga” is a path. And this path is eightfold and it is the
Noble Eightfold Path.
§ The Path has to be followed systematically, and Sammā Diṭṭhi or the vision to eliminate “san”
is the first step. A Sotāpanna has achieved this to a significant extent by comprehending
anicca, dukkha, anatta to a certain extent.
16. Therefore, the four step process stated in #1 above is a basic principle that can be used to solve
any problem (any mundane problem temporarily and the ultimate problem of existence permanently),
because it is based on the core principles of cause and effect that Nature is based on.
17. Nibbāna does not have a cause. It is reached via eliminating all causes. There are six root
causes that maintain this world for anyone: greed, hate, ignorance, non-greed, non-hate, non-
ignorance. All these are removed via paññā or wisdom. It is important to realize that wisdom is NOT
non-ignorance. Explanation of that requires another essay.
§ But for now, it is suffice to say that the four lowest realms of this world are maintained via the
“bad roots” of greed, hate, and ignorance. The rest of the 31 realms are maintained via non-
greed, non-hate, and non-ignorance, the so-called “good roots”. The real wisdom is attained
when one realizes that all those roots lead to attachment to “this material world”. But until one
develops wisdom to a certain extent by first removing the “bad roots”, it is not possible even to
grasp the meaning of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ This is why the Noble Eightfold Path is two-fold: the mundane (lokiya) Noble Eightfold Path is
to be followed first to avoid birth in the lowest four realms and to cleanse the mind to a certain
extent.
§ Then one follows the transcendental (lokuttara) Noble Eightfold Path to attain Nibbāna by fully
cleansing the mind of all six roots; see, “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great
Forty)“.
Next, “First Noble Truth – A Simple Explanation of One Aspect“, ………
6.1.1.6 First Noble Truth – A Simple Explanation of One Aspect
1. One does not need to be a Buddhist or even heard about the Buddha to know what conventional
“suffering” is. Anyone knows that getting sick, getting old, and dying is cause for suffering.
§ But then the Buddha said, “these four Noble Truths are not known to the world until a Buddha
describes them”.
§ Thus the Buddha was talking about a kind of suffering that ANYONE in this world is destined
to have either now or in the future. He was mainly concerned with the LONG TERM suffering,
in the future rebirths and how to STOP that from taking place.
2. However, there are some sufferings in this very life that arise due to our current way of life, or
what we do or think right now. In this post I want to address such “SHORT TERM” sufferings that
also can be AVOIDED.
§ A significant part of our suffering comes from the mind. Whether one lives in a grand mansion
or in a hut, this part of suffering is common to us all.
§ And even some famous and rich people that we know could not bear this mental pain to such an
extent that they committed suicide. From Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe to Whitney
Houston and Robin Williams, there are many well-known cases; see, WebLink: WIKI: List of
suicides for a long list that extends to the past.
§ Suicide Prevention, see : WebLink: HELPGUIDE: Suicide Prevention
3. Obviously, one can have mostly everything that any one of us can only wish for (health, wealth,
beauty, fame, etc), but still suffer. One could get a glimpse of what the Buddha meant by suffering if
one could contemplate on this issue, and that revelation itself could lead to the avoidance of that kind
of suffering.
§ We can get rid of a big part of suffering in the near future by controlling hate or displeasure
towards other people. Even though the other party may have done something wrong to us, most
of the suffering is inflicted by ourselves. This needs some contemplation to clarify.
4. Suppose I come to know that someone said a bad (and untrue) thing about me to others. The
moment I hear this my mind gets agitated. And I could be spending the next hour or two or even the
next day or two saying to myself and friends, “I cannot believe that so and so said this about me. Why
would he do that?”, and may be even be thinking about how to retaliate. All this time spent on such
activity was a burden to the mind. I caused more suffering to myself by just dwelling on it, and by
generating more hateful thoughts.
§ I could have handled the situation better as following: If I know from past experience that he
would not have said it without a reason, I need to talk to him and clarify the situation. If that
failed or if I knew that he was “just that type of a person” I just need to stay away from him.
We cannot control the behavior of other people. The best thing is to stay away from such
people.
§ Staying away from “bad company” is critical especially for children. It is imperative for the
parents to make sure that their children stay away from bad friends.
5. Another thing that is related is not to try to spend too much of your time and energy to convince
other people to see “things your way”. For valid or invalid reasons, each person has a set of beliefs
and convictions. I have realized that it causes unnecessary mental suffering to myself and others if I
try hard to convince the other party of my own views. I have no right to say my views are better than
the views of the others; I just explain things the way I see them.
§ Even the Buddha did not try to even advice certain people, because they could have caused
long-term harm for themselves by generating hateful thoughts of the Buddha.
§ One has to realize that getting rid of diṭṭhi or wrong views is the first step in getting some
“cooling down”. It is true that palpable “cooling down” can be attained by getting rid of the
worst wrong views; see, “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis“.
6. Then there is extreme greed, that could also lead to unnecessary suffering. Here one needs to make
a distinction between two extremes: It is really necessary to avoid physical discomfort on one
extreme. But trying to “acquire fancy things” for the sake of pride is the other extreme.
§ We do need food, clothes, shelter, and medicine to avoid living a miserable life. Therefore, we
need to make a decent living to provide such necessities for ourselves and our families.
§ However, if we try to acquire, for example a “bigger and fancy house”, that could cause anxiety
and even suffering especially one is stretching one’s resources to achieve that “extra bit of
happiness”. That “extra bit of happiness” could become a nightmare in some cases, for example
if one loses employment or encounters an unexpected expense.
7. One does not need to feel bad about the wealth one has acquired legitimately and to use that wealth
for one’s comfort. One has already paid for that in the past (a good kamma vipāka). In the same way,
if one is poor, one needs to understand two things per Buddha Dhamma: First, one is in that situation
because of a past cause (bad kamma vipāka). Second, and more importantly, one can work oneself out
of that situation, because kamma vipāka are not deterministic; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything
Determined by Kamma?”.
8. The key is to live within one’s means, and strive for a better living condition if one actually does
not have enough for a comfortable living. There is so much of “peace of mind” in a simple life, even
if one has a lot of wealth. Most people ruin their lives by trying to seek sense pleasures using money.
That only gets one on a track that leads to seeking more and more such pleasures and eventually
running out options.
§ The sad thing is that they do not know there is so much “peace of mind” to be had just by living
a simple life with less greed and less hate.
9. It is hard to fathom, but it is true that craving for valuable material things makes one’s mind
temporarily happy at times but perpetually burdened. This statement needs a lot of thought for
clarification.
§ The perceived happiness comes from the perceived “value” of the item by one’s mind, and if
that item is lost or damaged that can lead to much more suffering. Here is a hypothetical
situation: A mother dies and her two daughters inherit a supposedly highly valued necklace.
Each daughter wants it, and they get into arguments and both come to much mental suffering.
Eventually, a wise elder suggests to sell the item and share the money. When they try to sell it,
they find that it is of low quality and is really worthless. They had each inflicted so much
suffering because of a “perceived value” for that necklace.
10. The real happiness is not having anything to worry about. That does not mean one needs to give
away everything one has.
§ Using things that are available to oneself and having a greedy mindset are two different things.
§ One could be living in a mansion with a peace of mind knowing that all his/her wealth is not
forever, and another could be living with a burdened mind in a hut with so much attachment to
whatever little he/she has or with jealousy/hatred for what others have.
§ On the other hand, one could be living in a mansion with a burdened mind and could even
commit suicide, while a poor person who has learned Dhamma could be living in a hut with a
peace of mind content with what he/she has and knowing that any hardship is just for a short
time (in this life).
§ The bottom line is that things happen due to causes, and by controlling our minds we have the
power to initiate good causes (moral deeds) and to suppress bad causes (immoral deeds). Some
will be effective for the short term and all will be effective for the long term.
Also see, “First Noble Truth is Suffering? Myths about Suffering“.
Next, “Difference between a Wish and a Determination (Paramita)“, ………
6.1.1.7 Difference between a Wish and a Determination (Paramita)
1. It is easy to just wish for things, but a real determination has a firm commitment attached to it. A
determination is a wish accompanied by a plan to make the wish come true.
§ One can drop a stone in water and can wish for it to come back up. That is NOT going to
happen.
§ Some goals (wishes) can be attained in this life: quitting smoking, passing an exam, getting a
good job, etc. But still one has to make an effort, i.e., one has to act with determination to
achieve the wish.
2. Other goals can take many lifetimes to attain. These are called “pāramitā” (pronounced
“pāramithā”). Depending on the goal, a paramita can take many, many lifetimes. It is said that to
become a Buddha, one needs to have a firm commitment carried over billions of lives; that is a
paramita. And it is not like that someone just makes a wish to become a Buddha; that “gathi” or the
‘tendency” has to develop first over many lifetimes, initially starting with the habit of helping others
and generally living a moral life.
§ Buddha Dhamma is all about causes and effects. If one can understand the causes for something
to happen, and then work to make such cause to materialize, the effects WILL follow.
3. We can see that there are many people — some even may not have heard about Buddha Dhamma
— making great efforts to help others even at the risk of their own lives. Those people have such
sansāric habits and they do have goals, even if it may not be clear to them at all times. They are just
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
610 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
driven by that sansāric habit. If they come across pure Dhamma by any chance, they may be able to
focus their efforts accordingly.
§ To become an Arahant one needs to make a commitment and maintain it over many, many
lives. We all are likely to have made that commitment in one or more lives; of course we do not
know. And if we had made such a commitment and have worked on it over many lives, it may
be possible to fulfill it in this very life. Even otherwise, we can make a real effort to maintain
that “paramita” and strengthen it.
§ Some make firm determinations to become a deva, a brahma, an emperor, or just to be rich;
there are millions of things that people wish for, and sometimes make firm determinations on.
Some of them can come true in this lifetime itself, especially if that is a firm commitment
coming from previous lives. Normally the word “paramita” is reserved for those commitments
that target Nibbāna.
4. In physics, there is a simple law that says, “every action has a reaction”. In Buddha Dhamma, there
is an even more generalized law: when one keeps doing something, an invisible energy buildup
occurs that will result in a kamma bhava (a potential energy) that will bring about a result (even a
birth) of similar kind.
§ During a lifetime, the brain will help achieve goals by rewiring neural connections in the brain
when someone keeps trying to develop habits; see, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A
Scientific View“.
§ And such habits may be carried over future lives by embedding in one’s kamma seeds (beeja);
see, “Sansāric Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsava)“.
5. For example, if one keeps drinking heavily, it WILL become a habit; the brains neural connections
will get wired-up for it. If done long enough, it will get embedded in one’s psyche (i.e., in kamma
seeds), and one is likely to be matched up with a mother who has similar drinking habits, and then it
is likely that habit to continue in that life too. It takes a determined effort to “unwire” those neural
connections, more than just a wish.
§ If one keeps doing activities that are suitable for a dog, one will increasingly act like a dog with
such habits, and if that is kept up, eventually will be born a dog. It does not matter whether that
person wished to be rich or powerful, what matters is what one habitually does. In his/her mind,
one made that determination indirectly by acting accordingly.
6. In the same way, when one makes a determination to be “good”, and starts helping out others, and
start learning and living by Dhamma, one will be heading to “good births” whether one wishes or not.
Then they become deeply-ingrained habits that are taken from birth to birth, and become
“paramitas”.
§ Such dominant paramitas may manifest as one’s character (“gathi”). As I mentioned
previously, we can see such visible “gathi” in many people, regardless of their official religion
or culture.
7. Thus habits cultivate character (“gathi”), and persistence of such strong character qualities
or “gathi” through many rebirths develop into “paramitas”.
§Especially in young children such “gathi” may manifest and then it will be easier to cultivate
them. For example, in the post on “Evidence for Rebirth” there is a video of a child reciting
complex suttas; if he was encouraged to follow that path, he could be able to attain a stage of
Nibbāna in this very life. Similarly, a child with any kind of natural talent can be encouraged to
cultivate it easily, because those are sansāric habits.
8. Breaking a bad habit takes time too. It is best to cultivate an opposing good habit, or at least a
neutral one so that one has an option of doing something when the urge comes. For example, if one
wants to quit smoking, one could start chewing a gum instead.
§ Both in developing a good habit or breaking a bad habit, one is bound to break the trend once in
a while. A child learning to walk will fall many times. That is why one needs to have the
perseverance to get back up with a renewed determination.
Whether one is making a determination on a mundane goal or to attain a stage of Nibbāna, the posts
“The Four Bases of Mental Power”, “The Law Attraction”, and “Habits, Goals, and Character
(Gathi)” could provide helpful information.
Next, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“, …
6.1.2 Calming the Mind
thought. Initially, it may be hard, but with practice, it becomes easy. That is called Samatha
meditation, and some people can even get to meditative jhānic states with a lot of practice.
§ However, just like with the child’s examples mentioned above, these are just “tricks” to get a
temporary solution. Just like the child is bound to throw a tantrum again, any relief from
“breath meditation” is only fleeting.
3. Even Samatha meditation becomes easier if one lives a moral life. One must at least obey the
conventional five precepts of not killing other beings, stealing, lying, engaging in sexual misconduct,
or using excessive amounts of alcohol. If one can further abstain from harsh speech slandering, and
vain talk, that makes it even better; see, “Ten Immoral Actions – Dasa Akusala“, and “Punna Kamma
– Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā.”
§ One must be aware of those precepts 24 hours a day. They are not rituals to be obeyed.
One follows them to purify one’s mind. Don’t worry if a precept gets broken once-in-a
while. Such occurrences will become less and less with time.
4. The reason that the mind becomes agitated easily is because of the “gunk” that we have in our
minds (they are called kilesa or keles or mental impurities). All these “gunk” is there due to greed,
hate, and ignorance.
§ If a mind is free from greed, hate, and ignorance (that is easily said than done), then the mind
will be very calm, and nothing in the outside world can perturb that mind; see “2. The Basics in
Meditation” and “3. The Second Level - Key to Purify the Mind” for details.
5. In a simile, the Buddha compared a calm mind to a clear, calm lake that made the surroundings
serene. That lake could become undesirable, an eyesore, if one or more of the following happens. (i)
A dark-colored dye is in water, (ii) The lake has boiling water, (iii) Water is covered with moss, (iv)
Lake is perturbed by wind, (v) Water is turbid and muddy.
6. Similarly, a peaceful mind will become polluted due to five hindrances (pañca nīvarana). They are
called “nīvarana” because they cover the mind from seeing the right from wrong.
§ One cannot see the bottom of a lake if any of the above five factors are present. In the same
way, “see things clearly” if those hindrances are there.
§ They are kāmaccandha, vyāpāda, tina middha, uddhacca kukkucca, and vicikiccā.
7. Extreme sense desire (kāmaccanda) is like a dark dye. Kāmaccanda (“kāma” + “ichcha” + “anda”
means blinded by sense desires).
§ Here “kāma” means the five sense faculties that belong to the kama loka: eye, ear, nose, tongue,
and the body; “ichcha” is desire, and “anda” is for blind.
§ The attraction for something becomes so strong that one’s complete attention is on that object.
The mind can lose any control over what is sensible and what is not rational (or immoral).
8. Extreme hate (vayāpāda or vyāpāda) is like boiling water. We all have seen people who are so
enraged that they are out-of-control.
§ One could become “animal-like,” and actually one who develops such character (“gati”) could
end up in the hells (apāyas).
§ Vayapada (“vayā”+”pāda”) means traveling downward (in the 31 realms): “vaya” is destruction
and “pāda” means “(walking) towards.”
9. Thina middha (“frozen mind”) is like moss covering the water. Sleepiness is just a symptom of it.
It is a dull mind that has not been exposed to Dhamma.
§ When one learns Dhamma, one’s mind gets energized. Those meditators who fall asleep during
meditation can get rid of that problem by learning pure Dhamma.
10. Uddacca-kukkucca (customarily translated as restlessness and brooding), arise because of high-
mindedness (uddhacca) and low-mindedness (kukkucca); in most cases, because of the high-
mindedness, one tends to DO lowly things.
§ When one has uddhacca, one is “drunk” with power, money, etc. When one has kukkucca, one
is willing to do “lowly things” suitable even for an animal. These are TWO mental factors
(cetasika).
§ Both these characteristics lead to a scattered mind that is incapable of seeing right from wrong;
as a nīvarana, they arise together. After the Sotāpanna stage, only uddhacca remains as a
cetasika. It goes away only at the Arahant stage.
11. Vicikicchā is the tendency to do stupid things because of the ignorance of the true nature of this
world. It comes from “vi” is twisted, “ca” (pronounced “cha”) is thoughts, and “kiccā” is an action
done with “iccā” or cravings.
§ For example, the tendency to do immoral actions to get one wants comes from vicikicchā. One
does not know, or does not care, about the bad consequences of such activities. Thus vicikicchā
is compared to muddy water. [kicca : [nt.] duty; work; service; that which should be done.]
§ One must get rid of both the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi and comprehend Tilakkhaṇa to some
extent. That means to have a good idea about the real nature of this world. That helps
REMOVE the vicikiccā nīvarana. But suppressing that is enough to attain jhānā.
12. In another simile, the Buddha compared the five hindrances (pañca nīvarana) to the darkness that
keeps one from seeing the true nature. For example, one who is extremely angry is not aware of the
damage done to the other person and for oneself. At least at that moment, hate and anger blind that
person.
§ A mind “blinded” by the five hindrances can keep on adding “more bad stuff” even without
realizing it. If you take a glass of muddy water and add more mud to it, you cannot see much
difference. On the other hand, if you take a glass of clean water, you can see the presence of
even a bit of dirt.
§ Thus when the mind is free of the five hindrances, one can easily see if any evil thoughts come
to the mind. Then it is easy to contemplate the possible adverse consequences of such ideas and
to remove them. That will keep the mind from becoming perturbed. A mind free of the five
hindrances is calm and peaceful.
§ That is why one should listen to discourses or read Dhamma posts preferably at a time when the
mind is calm. Then one can absorb more.
13. It is important to practice Samatha meditation for a short times. That allow one to have a
peaceful state of mind during that time. But it does not remove any defilements (ie., the
underlying root causes). Ariya meditation leads to the gradual removal of evils; see, “Bhāvanā
(Meditation).”
§ The reason for these hindrances to be present is the bad habits (“gati“) we have developed over
many lives. They have become deep-seated cravings (“āsavas”) which remain with us as
mental impurities (kilesa). When one starts on Ariya meditation, such bad habits, desires, and
mental impurities will decrease. In the simile we talked about in the beginning, the water in that
lake will become pure by removing the dye, boiling water, moss, wind, and the mud. In the
same way, the lake becomes calm and serene again in the absence of those ROOT CAUSES.
§ The hindrances of thina middha and vicikicchā go away at the Sotāpanna stage. Those of
kāmachanda, vyāpāda, and uddhacca-kukkucca reduce to kāma rāga, paṭigha, and uddhacca.
At this stage, the remaining three are no longer nīvarana. Kāma rāga and paṭigha are lessened
at the Sakadāgāmī stage and disappear at the Anāgāmī stage. Uddacca goes away only at the
Arahant stage.
§ Progressive lessening of five hindrances can bring the mind to a stable, peaceful state over
time. That happens even before the Sotāpanna stage. Then one could feel the increase of the
nirāmisa sukha that it brings; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?.”
Next, “Solution to a Wandering Mind – Abandon Everything?”, ……..
6.1.2.2 Solution to a Wandering Mind – Abandon Everything?
Our minds become agitated when we see, hear, smell, taste, touch, or just think about something that
we really like or really dislike. Those are called thought objects (arammana/aramuna in Pāli or
Sinhala). If the thought object is to our liking, our mind starts the “wheeling process” on how to own
it or at least to enjoy it for a while; if the thought object is something we dislike, the same “wheeling
process” takes off on trying to figure out how to get rid of it; see, “Nibbāna – Is It Difficult to
Understand?“.
Living in a busy society, we are bombarded with multiple thought objects continuously. Of course it
can be reduced by going to a quiet place, where there are less EXTERNAL objects that could give
rise to multiple thoughts; many people do that to find a “bit of peace”. Better yet, we can go to a
meditation retreat where we focus the mind on breath for example, and get a wonderful calmness.
But the problem is that peacefulness, calmness of the mind goes away when we get back to the
“normal life” with normal distractions (multiple thought objects). Is it possible to have a “peace of
mind” without going to seclusion?
To understand what actually happens in our minds, let us think about the following case:
1. If you go to a stream, disturb the sediment at the bottom until the water gets dirty, you can fill a
glass with that dirty water. It looks brown when stirred well.
2. Now if you set the glass on a table and let it sit there undisturbed, in a little while the dirt will drop
to the bottom and the water will become clear.
3. If you stir it again with a stick, the water will be brown again; this is analogous to a thought object
that is of great interest to us. BUT if you try to stir it with a thread, it will not get stirred; the thread is
too weak to stir it. Similarly, we are not disturbed by a thought object that is of no interest to us.
4. If you now take a fine strainer, remove the dirt from that water, and put it back in the same glass, it
will now be clear. Now, if you stir it as much as you want even with a stick, the water will never
become brown.
5. We all have “sediments” (or deep-seated cravings or “āsavas”) in our minds that have been
brewing/accumulating due to sansāric habits (“gathi”); see, “Habits and Goals“. Each one has a set of
different “sediments” or different habits, i.e., one tends to like certain things AND also dislikes
certain other things.
6. So, what happens is when we see something that we like OR dislike, our “sediments” get
disturbed. How much it gets disturbed depends on how strongly we like OR dislike it.
§ A strong disturbance may be the sight of a person you really like OR really dislike. But if it is
something that does not interest you, it will be like stirring with a thread.
7. During the day, we have innumerable “inputs” coming in through the six senses; these stir up the
sediments (“āsavas”) inside us and bring out the five hindrances.
§ Our minds are constantly agitated, but we may not even realize it because this is the “baseline
state” that we have been used to. But we can at least suppress these five hindrances and make
the mind calm; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
8. What you are doing in samatha meditation (focusing the mind on the breath) is to let those
sediments settle down. You feel peaceful. This is why you don’t get the same results consistently.
Some days your mind may be especially perturbed by something.
9. This is why people feel great at the end of a long meditation retreat. All the sediments are well-
settled.
§ But after coming back and getting back to regular routine, all external disturbances are back
and the quality of that experience slowly wears out; may be not completely, if one keeps
practicing at home.
10. However, an Arahant has removed all the sediments. Even if an Arahant is exposed to any type of
sensual/hateful situation, his/her mind will not be disturbed:
§ A male Arahant will not be seduced by the most beautiful woman in the world; he will not have
any hateful feelings towards a person who just cut off his arm.
§ So, an Arahant is like a pure glass of water that does not have any sediments at the bottom.
11. We don’t have to become Arahants to improve the quality of our lives. What we can do is to try to
get rid of some of the bad habits that are not good in the long term anyway:
§ For example, if we really dislike someone, we can start cultivating metta (loving kindness) for
that person in our mind first. Whenever angry thoughts about the person comes to the mind, try
to counter that; think about something wonderful or peaceful instead.
§ If we have a craving for alcohol, tasty but unhealthy food, etc, think about the possible bad
results, and again try to steer the mind to something else, some other activity.
Of course this needs to be done gradually. People who make New Year resolutions sometimes
abandon them because they try to just “give up” something in one big step. The mind does not like
that; it likes to change only when it actually experiences the benefits of changing the habit.
12. Finally, living a simple, moral life (following the five precepts), goes a long way to reduce such
bad habits, and to have a peaceful mind in the midst of all “possible distractions”.
§ Simple yet powerful guidelines to achieve a peaceful state of mind is discussed in a step-by-
step process in: “Living Dhamma“.
Thus it is all about cleaning up one’s defilements (bad habits) INSIDE, i.e., in one’s mind; see,
“1. Introduction to Buddhist Meditation“. Once that is done for all defilements, no outside
influence can affect one’s composure (see #10 above). One CAN even attain that ultimate stage
while staying in the real world.
1. The fourth precept of the five precepts for a moral life is right speech. Most people literally take it
to mean “not lying”. But since we know that intention (cetana) is at the root of deciding whether an
action is right or wrong, we always need to be careful about what we intend to achieve by what we
say.
2. If one does a wrong deed, one may be able to deny it in a statement worded in such way as to
conform to legality. Yet it is registered as false speech in one’s own mind, and thus one is not able to
escape the kammic consequences.
3. Ven. Ayya Khema, in her book, “Visible Here and Now” (p. 53), has nicely summarized what right
speech is NOT:
§ If you know something that is not helpful and is untrue, then do not say it
§ If you know something that might be helpful, but is untrue, do not say it
§ If you know something that is not helpful and is true, do not speak about it
§ If you know something that is helpful and is true, then find the right time to say it
4. If you carefully examine the above four statements, they say to prevent from lying, gossiping, and
hate or vain speech; these are the four ways one can accumulate immoral kamma with speech (see,
“Ten Immoral Actions – Dasa Akusala“). Let us look at some of the examples from the Tipiṭaka on
how the Buddha himself handled some situations.
5. When the Buddha was at the Jetavanaramaya for many years, there lived a “pig killer” Cunda right
next door. When some monks suggested to the Buddha that he should preach the Dhamma to Cunda
and get him to understand the consequences of his actions, the Buddha explained that if he were to go
there and try to do that Cunda would only generate hateful thoughts (paṭigha) about the Buddha, and
thus will commit an even worse kamma.
6. On the other hand, the Buddha walked a long distance to get to Angulimāla just before he was to
kill his own mother. Angulimāla had killed almost thousand people, but that was on the prompting of
his teacher, who was trying to get Angulimāla into trouble. That morning, the Buddha saw what was
about to happen and knew that he would be able to convince Angulimāla of the bad consequences of
his actions. Angulimāla became an Arahant in a few weeks.
7. In the case of the wanderer Vaccagotta asking the Buddha about whether there is a “self” or “no-
self”, the Buddha just remained silent.
§ After Vaccagotta left, Buddha’s personal attendant, Ven. Ānanda, asked him why Buddha did
not explain the concept that it is not correct to say “there is no soul” or “there is a
soul” (because there is only an ever-changing lifestream) to Vaccagotta. The Buddha told
Ānanda that he did not think Vaccagotta was mentally capable at that time to understand the
concept, and that he did not want to confuse him. See the post, “What Reincarnates? – Concept
of a Lifestream” for the correct explanation.
8. The Buddha was endowed with that capability to see other people’s mental status. We do not have
that capability. So, we need to use our own judgement.
9. Lying to another human being may have even worse consequences (depending on the particular
case) than killing a being of a lower realm. The kammic effects of such offenses depends on the status
of the being in question and the consequences of the particular action. For example, killing an
Arahant or one’s own parents is a much worse crime than killing a normal human, and killing any
human is much worse than killing any animal; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kammas“.
10. During the Nazi terror in Germany, many Germans “lied” to the Nazi’s that they were not hiding
Jews in their houses; of course the intention was to save human lives and thus it was the right thing to
do. They acquired good kamma for protecting lives.
§ We need to realize that “lying” — as meant in as “musāvāda” in the five precepts — really
means the “intention” involved: “Musā” means “wrong or incompatible with morals” and
“vāda means “speech”; see, “What is Intention in Kamma?“.
§ Therefore, even though they were literally lying, their intention was not a “musāvāda“, but
actually a “good deed”.
Next, “Learning Buddha Dhamma Leads to Nirāmisa Sukha“, ………
6.1.2.4 Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?
2. Āmisa means material; “āmisa dāna” is offering of material things. Thus āmisa sukha is the
pleasures that arise from material things. Sense pleasures are the ones all of us are familiar with. We
like to indulge in sense pleasures. We like to see beautiful pictures or people; hear soothing music;
taste good food, etc.
§ The drawback with sense pleasures is that the pleasure lasts only while one is satisfying the
particular sense faculty; as soon as we finish eating, for example, the pleasure goes away. Also,
we cannot keep eating either, even if we wanted to; we will get sick of it soon enough no matter
how good the food is.
§ Same is true for any other sense pleasure. One cannot keep listening to music or watch movies
for too long at a stretch.
§ However, the craving for any sense pleasure comes back after a while. It is never permanently
satisfied.
3. People who have been doing samatha meditation (for example, breath or kasina) know that it gives
a pleasure that is different from any sense pleasure.
§ One could meditate for hours (especially if one gets into a jhānic state), and can enjoy it as long
as one wants. Furthermore, even after the session, the calming effect is there for a while. It
gives a sense of peacefulness that can last for hours.
§ If one dies while in a jhānic state, then one will be born in the corresponding Brahma world
(either in the rūpa loka or in the arūpa loka depending on the jhānic state). However, a birth in
one of the lowest four realms is not ruled out for births after that.
§ The ability to get into jhānic states could be lost even in this lifetime if one commits a really
bad kamma, or start indulging heavily in sense pleasures.
§ Jhānic states are attained via TEMPORARY blocking of the defilements of greed and hate
from the mind by focusing the mind on a neutral object such as breath, rising and falling of
stomach, or a kasina object, for example.
4. The nirāmisa sukha is of more permanent nature even compared to jhānic pleasures, especially if
one has attained at least the first stage of Nibbāna, the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Nirāmisa is opposite of amisa that we mentioned earlier; thus nirāmisa sukha does not arise
due to material things. It is totally mental, it is in fact the happiness due to release or
dissociation from material things. It is more of a relief sensation rather than an enjoyment. It is
like the feeling when a pulsating headache goes away; a sense of calm and peacefulness.
§ Stated in another way, nirāmisa sukha is present when where there is no suffering.
§ The nirāmisa sukha of a Sotāpanna (or above) is never lost. If Ariya jhānas are cultivated, that
can be summoned at any time. The Sotāpanna status is never lost even through future lives.
5. Once the final stage of Nibbāna is attained, there is nothing else to do. An Arahant who has
developed higher jhānas can even experience the full Nibbānic pleasure (saññā vedayita nirodha
sammapatti) can be summoned at will any time during the lifetime for up to seven days at a time. At
death, permanent Nibbāna is attained.
§ The four Nibbānic states are attained via PERMANENT removal of greed, hate, and ignorance
in four stages. This involves insight (vipassana) meditation, most importantly on the three
characteristics of existence: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Even before the Sotāpanna stage, one can start feeling the nirāmisa sukha by systematically
removing greed, hate, and ignorance; see, “How to Taste Nibbāna“.
More information on nirāmisa sukha can be found at “Nirāmisa Sukha“.
1. It is good hear from those who have been able to “get to a peaceful state of mind” by reading posts
at this site. This is nothing but early stages of Nibbāna or “niveema” or “cooling down”, and is also
called the “nirāmisa sukha“. That is a characteristic of “pure Dhamma” and I cannot take any credit
for it. This post explains how it happens.
§ In other posts I have discussed why “formal meditation” is not required to attain the Sotāpanna
stage; see, for example, “What is the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“. Here would
like to discuss how this “nirāmisa sukha” arises when one reads (or listens) to the true
Dhamma, and how that can take one all the way to the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Before that, I need to point out that the “Search” box on the top right can be very useful in
navigating the site when one is looking for specific information. Avoid writing sentences or
even phrases, but just enter keywords. One could narrow down the number of posts that come
up by adding more relevant keywords.
§ By the way, one could read earlier posts on nirāmisa sukha by just typing “niramisa sukha” in
the Search box.
§ On the issue of writing to me, it is best to make a comment on a web page if you have not sent
me any emails before. My mail account ([email protected]) puts emails from unknown
addresses to the junk folder most of the time. If you have previously received an email from
me, it is OK to write directly; but if it regarding a particular post, it is better to make the
comment under that web page. If you have written to me and did not get a response from me,
please try sending it as a comment under a web page.
2. Our minds are under stress constantly due to its tendency to know everything that is going on not
only at the physical vicinity, but also things that happened in the past or one’s hopes for the future.
§ That tendency intensifies when we have excessively greedy or hateful thoughts; these two are
called kamachanda (strong greed) and vyāpāda (strong hate), the two key elements of the five
hindrances that “cover our minds”. The other three hindrances are basically due to those and
also due to our ignorance how nature operates.
§ Think about how “you were on fire” when you got either excessively angry or excessively
greedy or lustful.
§ When one reads (or listens) attentively to anything of interest, all those hindrances are
REDUCED. However, depending on what type of material it is, this suppression may not be
very effective. For example, if one is reading a scientific or geography paper, they may be
reduced, but if one reading a pornographic novel or listening to rap music, they may actually
increase.
§ If one is reading Dhamma that is not true Dhamma (or for that matter, any type of religious
material), it will still reduce those five hindrances because that material will not induce any
greedy or hateful thoughts.
3. However, there is a big difference in reading (or listening to) true Buddha Dhamma. This is of
course something one can verify for oneself (as many have).
§ Listening or reading true Dhamma elevates the “preethi” (or “pīti“) cetasika making one joyful,
which in turn makes the body “light”, causes physical calmness, and lead to samādhi: “pīti
manassa kayo passadati, passadi kayo sukhantiyati, sukhino samadhiyati“.
§ We will discuss this at a deeper level, in Abhidhamma, where we will discuss how various
“mind made rūpa” like lahuta (lightness), Muduta (Elasticity), and Kammannata (wieldiness)
can make one’s body “light” or “heavy” depending on the mental status; see, “Rūpa (Material
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 619
Form) – Table“. For example, they are related to the cetasika like kayapassaddhi (tranquility of
mental body); cittapassaddhi (tranquility of consciousness); see, #6 of “Cetasika (Mental
Factors)“.
§ And this samādhi is attained via the suppression of ALL FIVE hindrances; it is commonly
called “samatha“. One does not need to do a special “samatha bhāvanā” (like the breath
meditation) to calm the mind. If one pays enough attention and gets absorbed in the subject
matter while listening to a desanā or reading Dhamma, one could even attain the Sotāpanna
stage.
4. This is the samādhi (or feeling of well-being) one feels when reading (or listening) to true
Dhamma. It is also called early stages of “nirāmisa sukha“; see the chart, “Nirāmisa Sukha – In a
Chart“. It can be printed for reference while reading this post.
§ “Nirāmisa sukha“, by definition, can be experienced only after one hears the true message of
the Buddha: anicca, dukkha, anatta, even though some sense of calm can also be experienced
when focusing on any religious activity in general where the difference between what is moral
and what is immoral is taught.
§ True nirāmisa sukha can be experienced only when one starts seeing a glimpse of the “true
nature of this world” and becomes a “Sotāpanna Anugami“, i.e., one on the way to become a
Sotāpanna. This means one is exposed to the true meaning of existence in this world of 31
realms: anicca, dukkha, anatta. Now one has the POTENTIAL to become a Sotāpanna.
§ When one strives and comprehends the key message of the Buddha that seeking lasting
happiness cannot be realized by staying in this beginningless rebirth process, one attains the
Sotāpanna stage. Then one can “see” the path to Nibbāna and proceed on one’s own. One has
removed an “Earth-equivalent of defilements” through Sammā Diṭṭhi; this is called “dassanena
pahathabba“, i.e., “removing defilements via true vision or wisdom”; see, “What is the Only
Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“.
§ Higher stages of Nibbāna normally need formal meditation techniques. The most
comprehensive is given in the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta. However, the early parts of the Mahā
Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, especially the Kayanupassana section, is geared towards help attaining the
Sotāpanna stage.
5. The key difference between a person following the mundane Eightfold path and the Noble
Eightfold Path is the following: One on the mundane path avoids immoral activities because one is
afraid of their consequences. However, a Sotāpanna avoids dasa akusala because he/she has seen the
FRUITLESSNESS of such immoral activities.
§ For example, “What is the point of lying to make money, if that cannot provide one with lasting
happiness?” That can be applied to any of the 7 immoral activities done by speech and the
body. And that is due to the cleansing of the mind and reduction of the 3 akusala done by the
mind, where the one of them (niyata micchā diṭṭhi) has now been permanently REMOVED;
see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
§ Thus the moral behavior (“sīla” or “seela“) of a Sotāpanna comes from within, and it is called
the “Ariyakāntha Seela“. It is unshakeable, and remains through future lives.
§ Just like someone who has really learned algebra instinctively knows how to solve a
previously-unsolved algebra problem, a Sotāpanna instinctively avoids doing dasa akusala of
“apayagami strength”, i.e., those actions that lead to birth in the apāyas. (On the other hand, a
person who has only memorized how to solve a few algebra problems can only solve those;
he/she is likely to make mistakes in dealing with previously unencountered problems).
§ Once one sees a glimpse of Sammā Diṭṭhi, one can cultivate it further; also the other seven
components of the Noble Eightfold Path (Sammā Sankappa, Sammā Vaca, etc) automatically
follow.
6. During the time of the Buddha, many people attained the Sotāpanna stage during the first discourse
they listened to. Attaining higher stages of Nibbāna could take more formal meditation by cultivating
the basics that one has just grasped.
§ Visaka attained the Sotāpanna stage at 7 years of age, and could not attain any higher stages
until death. King Bimbisara also died as a Sotāpanna. Yet they are guaranteed to attain full
Nibbāna within 7 bhava.
§ Upatissa and Kolita attained the Sotāpanna stage while listening to a single verse; it took them
a few days to attain the Arahant stage. They of course became the two chief disciples of the
Buddha, Ven. Sariputta and Ven. Moggallana.
§ Thus, formal meditation is normally needed to attain the higher stages of Nibbāna above the
Sotāpanna stage. Of course, there are exceptions, like Bahiya Daruchiriya, who attained the
Arahantship straightaway while listening to a verse uttered by the Buddha.
7. When one really feels that one has experienced significant level of nirāmisa sukha, one could use
that experience to build-up on that samādhi.
§ One can use the phrase, “‘etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho
sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho Nibbānan’ti”. [AN 9.36 : Jhānasutta, AN
10.6 : Samādhisutta, AN 3.32 : Ānandasutta, AN 11.8 : Manasikārasutta, AN 11.7 : Saññāsutta,
AN 10.60 : Girimānandasutta] [It is peaceful, it is serene, the expelling of all saṅkhāra,
breaking of bonds, removing greed and hate; Nibbāna]
§ Here is a recording of the Pāli verse by the Venerable Thero (recited 7 times; note the volume
control on the right):
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Ethan santhang ethan panithang ....
§ One could say in English, “This is peaceful, this is ecstasy, that is achieved by calming down
saṅkhāra, by breaking all bonds, by quenching of taṇhā, overcoming rāga, and eliminating all
causes, which is Nibbāna”.
§ What matters in not the actual words, but the understanding one has in one’s mind, even though
it may be best to recite in Pāli with the understanding. One should be recalling the “cooling
down” that one has achieved.
§ However, one should not spend too much time on this, as that will take time away from
learning Dhamma. Learning Dhamma could make attaining samādhi faster.
8. Whenever one become restless (the uddhacca kukkucca hindrance becoming strong) and get the
urge to “go watch a movie” or “stop by a friend’s house”, one could try reading (listening to)
Dhamma. Similarly, if one gets bored and lethargic (thina middha hindrance becoming strong), try
the same; ditto for when one is struggling to figure out “how to proceed on a key decision” due to the
vicikicchā hindrance.
§ The “preethi” or joyfulness that arises with samādhi WILL keep all those hindrances down,
especially the thina middha. This is the real test of one’s ability to get to samādhi. If the state of
samādhi is at a significant level, one should be able to follow the procedure in #7 above and
“not fall asleep” even right after a good meal when one usually gets sleepy.
9. Even though learning Dhamma in general will lead to the above discussed effects, comprehending
anicca, dukkha, anatta WILL make a big difference. However, that may take more reading and
comprehension of the wider world view of the Buddha: how kamma operates, 31 realms of existence,
the rebirth process, paṭicca samuppāda, etc.
§ It is not possible even to suggest which order of topics to choose, because each person is
different. And it is imperative that one should not rush through them. Gradual, steady
progress is better than getting the hopes high and feeling depressed if things do not
proceed fast enough.
§ What I would suggest, in general, is to first focus on the concepts that one starts understanding
easily and slowly expand the “knowledge base” by reading on other relevant links.
§ Also, it is good idea to go back and read some key posts that one has not read for a while. One
may grasp more content from the same post when read at a later time, because what is learnt in
the mean time could expose deeper meanings. I know this by experience. This is the uniqueness
of Buddha Dhamma; the learning never ends, rather it just intensifies with added evidence.
§ It will stop being a “chore” and will become joyful as one learns more and more. The more one
learns, the more energized one will become.
10. Even though it may not seem to be a “big deal”, understanding anicca (or cultivating the anicca
saññā) will make a huge change in one’s progress, after one gains some understanding of the basic
concepts like rebirth and kamma.
§ I had struggled intensely for 3-4 years and made an enormous advance in listening to one
discourse on anicca, dukkha, anatta. But of course I had learned a lot of background material
by that time, and had given a lot of thought to various concepts.
§ Still, by knowing what things are really important could make things easier for someone just
starting out, or has been “on the wrong path”.
§ My hope is that many will be able to attain at least the first stage of Nibbāna much more
quickly than I did.
6.1.2.6 Need to Experience Suffering in Order to Understand it?
§ If one is hungry, one CANNOT understand the causes of suffering; rather one will be
generating hateful thoughts. Same is true for all four necessities of life: food, shelter, clothing,
and medicine. We NEED those things to survive.
§ What we should NOT do is to over-indulge in any of the above four necessities of life. That is
the other extreme that the Buddha said to avoid: “kāma sukallikanu yoga“, or to over-indulge in
sense pleasures, i.e., to live a hedonistic life.
4. It is commonly said that the Buddha advocated the “middle ground”, i.e., to avoid both an ascetic
life (with self-induced suffering) or a hedonistic (over-indulgent) life. That is true, but there is more
to it.
There is a deeper meaning to “majjima patipada“. The way to a peaceful existence (or to Nibbāna) is
to get rid of greed, hate, AND ignorance. The two extremes that we talked about above do involve
hate or at least paṭigha or “friction” (when subjecting oneself to suffering) and greed (indulging in
excessive sense pleasures).
§ Just because one stays away from those two extremes does not necessarily mean one is on the
“correct path”. The Path is not just a “middle ground” between those two extremes.
§ The key is to learn Dhamma and to systematically reduce greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ Of course, living a life away from the two extremes is conducive — even necessary — to learn
Dhamma and to gradually remove defilements from the mind.
5. In between those two extremes, one needs to avoid being influenced by an “intoxicated mind”. In
between the above two extremes, people also act in improper ways intoxicated by power, beauty,
position, (book) knowledge, lineage, etc as well as by alcohol and drugs. This is due to avijjā or
ignorance.
§ Thus, “majjima patipada” really means to follow a lifestyle without corrupting the mind with
such things that can corrupt a mind and makes it unsuitable for contemplation on the deeper
truth of suffering in “this world of 31 realms”.
§ To clarify: “majji” is intoxication, and “mā” is to get rid of. Thus majjima patipada is to follow
a lifestyle that avoids the corruption of the mind by excess attachments to sense pleasures.
6. In summary, the Buddha recommended a “common sense” comfortable, but simple, life that is
conducive to meditation. Here meditation (bhāvanā) is not necessarily “formal meditation”. The
Buddha said, “bhavanaya bahuleekathaya“, or “contemplate as often as possible”. [bahulīkata:[pp.
of bahulīkaroti] took up seriously; increased.(adj.), practised frequently.]
§ One also needs to be avoiding immoral actions, speech, or thoughts as much as possible, and
actually cultivate moral actions, speech, and thoughts. That helps suppress the five hindrances
(pancanivarana) and have a peaceful state of mind, i.e., one could start experiencing the
nirāmisa sukha that arises due to a “more pure state of mind”.
7. One can be contemplating the nature of the world as one goes through daily chores. Another aspect
of this is the ability to calm the mind; see, “Key to Calming the Mind“.
§ A bigger picture implied here is that we need to educate our children so that they can find good
employment and thus be able to live without having to worry about those four necessities of
life. As they grow up, we need to educate them in Dhamma (how to live a moral life) too, but
not at the expense of them getting a good education.
8. Suffering is NOT the Noble truth on Suffering, i.e., Dukha (feeling of suffering) is NOT
dukkha sacca (the Noble Truth that suffering can be stopped from arising); sacca pronounced
“sachcha” and means “truth”.
§ The Noble truth of dukkha sacca is about comprehending how suffering ARISES due to
greed, hate, and ignorance (of this fact). One can understand that –and take steps to avoid
future suffering — by learning Dhamma: anicca, dukkha, anatta, paṭicca samuppāda, etc.
§ The Buddha said “This Dhamma is unlike anything that the world has ever seen”. The actual
suffering is hidden WITHIN the apparent enjoyments. Also see, “The Incessant Distress
(Peleema”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca“.
§ For another description of majjima patipada, see, “Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta“.
The following statements are in frequent use in most books in both Mahayana and Theravāda:
1. “We suffer because our bodies is impermanent; they are subject to decay and death”
2. “We suffer because those things we get attached to are impermanent”
3. “If something is impermanent, that leads to suffering”
4. “Since everything in this world is impermanent, everything is suffering”, etc.
So, is there a direct correlation between impermanence and suffering? Let us examine those
statements.
1. “We suffer because our bodies is impermanent; they are subject to decay and death”
§ It is true that WE suffer because OUR bodies are impermanent and are subject to decay and
death. But if it is an enemy, do we suffer when that enemy gets sick or die? We suffer if
someone we LIKE gets sick or die, but it is cause for celebration for most people when
someone they dislike gets sick or dies.
§ Actually the suffering/happiness is directly proportional to the attachment/dislike we have for
that person. Suffering due to a loss of one’s child is more compared to the loss of a distant
relative. Happiness due to Bin Laden’s death was higher compared to the death of an unknown
terrorist. (For a follower of Bin Laden, his death would have led to suffering).
Suffering arises only when things do not proceed as we like. It is the human nature to want the loved
ones to be unharmed, and the enemies to come to harm. When either does not happen, that leads to
suffering. That is what anicca means: the inability to maintain things to our liking.
2. “We suffer because those things we get attached to are impermanent”
§ There are many things in this world that cause us suffering because they will not stay in the
same condition or are destroyed; that is true. BUT there are many other “permanent” things in
this world (at least relative to our lifetime of 100 years), AND if they cause us suffering that is
NOT because they decay or are destroyed; rather it is because we cannot maintain them to our
satisfaction.
§ If a woman has a gold necklace it is not impermanent, i.e, it will last for thousands of years. But
the woman could become distressed if the necklace is lost or if she has to sell it to raise money
for food or some such necessity.
If ANYTHING causes US suffering, that is because we cannot maintain it to OUR satisfaction, OUR
liking.
3. “If something is impermanent, that leads to suffering”
This is the direct (incorrect) translation of Buddha’s words: “yadaniccam tan dukkham“, i.e., “if
something is not permanent, that leads to suffering”. But the correct translation is, “if something
cannot be maintained to our liking, that leads to suffering”. Let us consider some examples:
§ If we have a headache, and if it is not permanent (i.e, it goes away), does that cause suffering?
No. However, if the headache becomes permanent, that will cause a lot of suffering.
§ If we get cancer, wouldn’t it cause happiness if it becomes impermanent?, i.e., if it goes away?
§ If a relative that we do not like come to stay with us, would it lead to happiness if the stay
becomes permanent or impermanent? Of course it will cause us happiness if the stay is not
permanent and the person leaves.
4. “Since everything in this world is impermanent, everything is suffering”
The Buddha never said everything in this world leads to suffering. If everything is suffering then
everyone will be looking to attain Nibbāna as soon as possible. The reality is that there are sense
pleasures to be had in this world. Most people do not understand why one should go to all this trouble
to “give up all these sense pleasures and seek Nibbāna“.
§ Taking the “big picture”, out of the 31 realms in this world, there are actually many realms
where suffering is much less than even the human realm; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“.
§ But there is unimaginable suffering in the lowest four realms, AND that is what we need to
avoid. Even though there are 31 realms, MOST LIVING BEINGS (99.99%+) are trapped in the
lowest four realms.
§ Thus what is true is that this sansāric journey is filled with UNIMAGINABLE suffering.
However, one cannot see that unless one learns true Dhamma.
§ Even in this life there is much suffering, especially as one gets old, and the suffering is highest
close to death if the death is due to an ailment. If one enjoys sex, that ability to enjoy sex will
fade away as one gets old; it does not matter how much money one has. Even our taste buds
will not give us the same enjoyment from foods as we get old. All our sense faculties will start
performing less and less as we get old. This is anicca; we cannot maintain things to our
satisfaction in the long run.
§ Even if we are born in a higher realm where there is much happiness, that also cannot be
maintained. One day, that life will be over and one WILL end up in a lower realm at some
point, and then it will be very hard to get out of there. That is anicca.
§ Furthermore, if the cause of suffering is impermanence, then it cannot be eliminated, see,
“Would Nibbāna be Possible if Impermanence is the Cause of Suffering?“.
In Pāli (or in Sinhala), the word “icca” (pronounced “ichchā”) means liking. Thus anicca
(pronounced “anichchā”) means not to liking.
Therefore, the correct translation of “yadaniccam tan dukkham” is “if something cannot be
maintained to our satisfaction, that leads to suffering”. You can take any example you like and verify
for yourself that it is a universal principle, an unchanging characteristic of this world, as the Buddha
stated.
Without understanding the three characteristics of “this world”, it is not possible to grasp the message
of the Buddha. Those three characteristics are: anicca, dukkha, anatta. These are the words in the
Tipiṭaka, that was written down more than 2000 years ago, in 29 BCE.
§ The problem started when these words were translated to Sanskrit as anitya, dukha, anatma;
this started probably as far back as in the first or second century CE.
§ Then those Sanskrit words were translated to English as impermanence, suffering, and “no-
self”. The two worst translations are impermanence and “no-self”.
§ Those two Sanskrit words, anitya and anatma, are being used by many in Sri Lanka today as
Sinhala words representing the translations of the “Pali words”, anicca and anatta.
§ However, anicca and anatta are “old Sinhala” words (i.e., not in use today, but when explained
one can see the meaning) with completely different meanings than anitya and anatma.
The Buddha stated that those three characteristics, anicca, dukkha, and anatta are related:
“yadaniccam tan dukkham, tan dukkham tadanatta”, or,
“if something is not nicca, dukha arises, and because of that one becomes helpless, i.e., anatta”.
As mentioned above, as one gets old or gets disabled, these three characteristics will be easier to see
for oneself; but then it would be too late, because the mind gets weaker as we get old One needs to
learn Dhamma BEFORE the mind (and the body) become weak. Here is a set of pictures that show
this clearly : RANKER: Celebrities Who Have Aged the Worst
Also, see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta - Wrong Interpretations“, and “Why is Correct Interpretation of
Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta so Important?” for more details.
Next, “What is Mind – How do we Experience the Outside World?“, ……….
6.1.3 Buddha Dhamma and Buddhism
1. When I hear the common statement, “all religions are the same, they teach you how to live a
MORAL LIFE”, I cringe. That is because I think about all those people who are unaware of the actual
message of the Buddha.
§ It is true that most religions teach how to live a moral life. And there is also evidence that
atheists may be as moral as religious people are; see, “WebLink: Morality in everyday life-
Science-2014-Hofmann“.
§ However, Buddha Dhamma goes beyond that. The Buddha said, no matter how well we live
this life that will not help one in the LONG TERM.
§ Yet, even to understand that message of the Buddha, one needs to live a moral life first.
§ Even if a heavenly rebirth is attained in the next life, a future rebirth in the four lowest
realms (apāyas) cannot be avoided without attaining the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna. A
phrase used by some bhikkhus in Sri Lanka goes as, “May you attain Nibbāna at the time of the
Buddha Maithree (next Buddha)”. Why not attain Nibbāna in this life? Who is going to give
guarantees that one will be born human during the time of the Buddha Maithree? Everyone
should make use of this rare opportunity to be human, to strive now!
§ Until one comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta, one always values future happiness in a
permanent heaven (most religions) OR temporary happiness in heavenly worlds (traditional
“Buddhists”). The difference between a traditional “Buddhist” and a Bhauddhayā is discussed
in “A Buddhist or a Bhauddhayā?“.
§ One actually starts on the transcendental (lokuttara) or the Noble Eightfold Path when one
comprehends the dangers of the rebirth process and BECOMES a Sotāpanna.
§ When one is trying to attain that understanding, one is called a Sotāpanna magga anugāmi; see,
“Sotāpanna Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna“.
3. Thus one starts on the Noble Eightfold Path starting with lokuttara (transcendental) sammā diṭṭhi
of a Sotāpanna (set of blue boxes). One has seen a “glimpse of Nibbāna“, i.e., one KNOWS that
permanent happiness is not possible anywhere in the 31 realms and that whatever effort one makes to
achieve such a happiness is like chasing a mirage.
§ Note the difference in the box next to “sammā diṭṭhi” in the two cases. In the mundane path,
“sammā sankappa, sammā vaca, sammā kammanta” are “moral thoughts, speech, and actions”
intended to avoid bad outcomes and to seek good outcomes.
§ In the Noble path, “sammā sankappa, sammā vaca, sammā kammanta” are “thoughts, speech,
and actions” intended to stop the rebirth process. One does not do immoral things because
there is “no point” in doing such things. One knows that such things are not only unfruitful,
but also dangerous, in the long run.
§ And one becomes more compassionate towards all living beings (not just humans), because one
can see that each living being is suffering because of ignorance of the Buddha’s key message.
One also realizes that one needs to fulfil obligations to others in order to “pay back old debts”;
one is bound to the rebirth process not only via cravings for worldly things, but also via unpaid
debts from previous lives.
4. The decision to become a Sotāpanna magga anugami (the path to the Sotāpanna stage) can be
made anytime after getting to the “red boxes”, i.e., while one is on the mundane Eightfold Path.
§ In a way, a Sotāpanna magga anugami is a A Buddhist or a Bhauddhayā? in the real sense.
Even though not in the Tipiṭaka, sometimes the word “Cula Sotāpanna” (pronounced “chüla
Sotāpanna”) is also used to describe the same person.
§ The key is to comprehend the “true nature of this world of 31 realms” that the Buddha
described, i.e., that it is not possible to achieve/maintain anything that can be kept to one’s
satisfaction (anicca), thus one gets to suffer (dukkha), and thus one is truly helpless in the
rebirth process (anatta). This realization itself is like lifting a heavy load that one has been
carrying, the first true taste of Nibbāna.
5. This “change of mindset” for a Sotāpanna is PERMANENT, i.e., it will not change even in future
rebirths. One has attained an “unbreakable” level of confidence (saddhā) in the Buddha, Dhamma,
and Saṅgha.
§ And a Sotāpanna can follow the rest of the 7 steps in the Noble Eightfold Path even without
help from others. Thus one will attain the next three stages of Nibbāna (Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī,
Arahant) successively by following those steps.
6. In the Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta, the Buddha outlined how one needs to first follow the mundane
(“lokiya“) Eightfold Path; see, “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“. This is a
first NECESSARY step in order to get rid of the worse kinds “gunk” that have been built up over
countless lives.
§ With the unique message of the Buddha has been hidden for hundreds of years, what is
conventionally practised today is just this mundane Eightfold Path. This is what we call
“Buddhism” today.
§ Since “Buddhism” not that different from what is advised by most other religions, it is easier
for people to resonate with the mundane concepts in “Buddhism”, where Sammā Diṭṭhi , for
example, is considered to be the “correct vision” of “how to live a moral life”.
§ Of course that is a first necessary step. That will help one to be able to experience the benefits
of moral behavior (even in this life as a “nirāmisa sukha“; see “How to Taste Nibbāna“) and
then to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta, and to embark on the Noble Eightfold Path to seek
permanent happiness or Nibbāna.
Next, “Is Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) a Religion?“, ……….
6.1.3.2 A Buddhist or a Bhauddhayā?
1. The terms “Buddhism” and “Buddhist” were invented by the English, French, and German
historians in the nineteenth century when they first came across Buddha Dhamma in India and Sri
Lanka.
§ The discovery of the “Asoka pillars” in India was followed by the discovery of the Pāli
literature on Buddha Dhamma in Sri Lanka and other countries such as Burma and Thailand
(together with translated Chinese scripts); of course there were no practicing “Buddhists” or
any Buddhist literature in India.
2. Here are two key points that should be the basis of defining the terms:
§ Up to that time it was “Buddha Dhamma” or the “Dhamma or Teachings of the Buddha”.
§ The word Buddha comes from “bhava” + “uddha“; here, “bhava” means “existence (in the 31
realms)” and “uddha” means “removal”. Therefore, Buddha is one who figured out how to stop
the rebirth process and thus end future suffering.
§ And a person who diligently followed the Path advised by the Buddha was called a
“Bhauddhayā” (= bhava + uddha + yā = one who strives to stop the rebirth process, i.e., to stop
suffering).
3. However, many people today have been exposed to bits and pieces of Buddha Dhamma.
§ They are just happy to follow the precepts of moral conduct, do some samatha meditation
(breath meditation) to relieve the stresses of modern life, and to see where that leads them; see,
“Goenka´s Vipassana“.
§ That is a perfectly good approach, at least to start off. But Buddha Dhamma is much deeper,
and can lead to a state where there is absolutely no suffering, i.e., Nibbāna; see, “Nibbāna“.
4. Each person understands Buddha Dhamma differently, mainly based on the level of exposure to
“correct Dhamma”.
§ Thus most people have the following misconceptions: (1) that Buddha Dhamma will help
alleviate suffering from physical ailments, (2) that it provides only temporary relief (also called
nirāmisa sukha) from mental stress (as in breath meditation).
5. However, the Buddha pointed out two forms of hidden suffering that humans are not aware of:
§ That incessant distress or agitation that we all feel (but mostly are unaware of)arises due to
greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ Immoral deeds that we commit due to these greedy, hateful, or ignorant mindset will lead to
much higher forms of suffering in future rebirths (especially in animal and other lower realms).
6. Some do not believe in the rebirth process, so they cannot really “get traction” with the second
type suffering associated with the rebirth process.
§ Many have experienced the nirāmisa sukha while participating in meditation retreats or regular
meditation programs at home. However, they do not realize that such nirāmisa sukha can be
made permanent, by learning pure Dhamma and by comprehending the anicca nature of this
world; see, “Starting on the Path Even without Belief in Rebirth“ and “Is It Necessary for a
Buddhist to Eliminate Sensual Desires?“.
§ It is only when one starts realizing the anicca nature, that one becomes a true Bhauddhayā in
the sense of its meaning in #2 above.
7. A Bhauddhayā starts to realize the futility of staying anywhere in the 31 realms, and at some point
will attain the first stage of Nibbāna, i.e., become a Sotāpanna.
§ At that stage one would have made that nirāmisa sukha permanent, i.e., if one did not do any
mediation for the rest of the life, he/she will retain that nirāmisa sukha.
§ A Sotāpanna would also be automatically be released from future births in the apāyas or the
four lowest realms.
§ How that happens is described in other sections of the site, especially in the section, “Sotāpanna
Stage of Nibbāna“.
8. Many people initially become Buddhists because of either a desire to learn more about the “wider
world”, contemplate on the “long-term existence”, i.e., the never ending rebirth process, or because
they are interested in living a moral life that provides a sense of happiness.
§ But in the very strict sense, if one really wants to follow the Path prescribed by the Buddha and
become a “Bhauddhayā“, one needs to first understand what the rebirth process is, and why it is
important to stop the rebirth process, i.e., they need to understand anicca, dukkha, anatta.
9. There are no rituals to become either a Buddhist or a Bhauddhayā. As one becomes convinced of
the Buddha’s world view and starts seeing that it is fruitless to HARM ONESELF OR OTHERS to
gain anything “in this world”, he/she starts becoming a better Budhist or a Bhauddhayā.
§ As one becomes a Buddhist/Bhauddhayā, his/her personality may start changing without
forcefully changing it. That is because one starts seeing the world differently and reacting to
outside events differently. It is all about changing perceptions about “this world”, i.e., it is all
mental.
§ Because of this, one cannot become a Bhauddhayā or even a good Buddhist by just following
rituals. One becomes a good Buddhist/Bhauddhayā by attempting to comprehend the message
of the Buddha, and by experiencing the benefits as one progresses.
”Dhammo ha ve rakkati Dhammacari”, i.e., “Dhamma will guide and protect one who lives by
Dhamma”. If one really starts becoming a Buddhist/Bhauddhayā, one will be able to see the changes
in oneself as time goes by (others will start noticing after a bit longer). One’s likings and associations
are the first to change.
Next, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“, ……….
6.1.3.3 Where to Start on the Path?
This is a very important post. Please read the post through without clicking on any link first, in order
to get the main idea that I am trying to convey. You may want to re-read the post several times,
clicking on the links to find out more as you digest the key points. Actually, this is true of all the
posts: It is better to read through a given post first to get the main idea, and then to look into
the details provided by the links as needed.
§ Anyone reading this website has been exposed to Buddha Dhamma in the past; by “past” I
mean beginning-less time. Each of us have been “living” and “dying” innumerable times, in
most of the 31 realms of existence; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“. Even though
a Buddha appears in the world after very long times, there have been innumerable Buddhas too.
Some of you may not believe this, and that is fine. It may make sense later on.
Each of us has listened to a Buddha delivering a discourse, attained the highest jhānas, and also been
born in the animal and niraya (the lowest realm) too. Our character and habits may have changed
from “good” to “bad” many times over. Infinite time is very hard to grasp with the mind; see,
“Sansāric Time Scale“, and “Infinity – How Big is it?“. Also, you may want to read the excellent
book, “The Beginning of Infinity” by David Deutsch (2011) IF you are interested in a “scientific
opinion”; actually, the descriptions are very similar in both cases in the sense that many things that
sound implausible are not scientifically implausible, and in fact are necessary to explain the scientific
data.
§ As in this life, it is easy to remember relatively recent events in the sansāric journey. Those
who can remember past lives, remember only the past one or few lives; see, “Evidence for
Rebirth“. The ‘habits” and “tendencies” that we have are the ones that we have had in the
recent rebirths.
§ Therefore, for some people, it may be easier to get into a jhāna (or to have a good meditative
experience) just because they have had that experience in more recent lives; for another person,
it may be harder just because that person may not have had that experience for very many births
in the recent past.
One should not be discouraged if one’s understanding of Dhamma or “meditation experience” seems
to be different from what one hears from others. The important thing is to first determine where one is
in the relative scale of things and start at the right place. Most times there is no correlation between
this evaluation and one’s “book knowledge” either.
One could use the basic guidelines provided by the Buddha. There are five stages starting with dana
and ending with nekkhamma:
§ Dana (giving, generosity, caring for others’ well being).
§ Sīla (moral conduct).
§ Sagga (literally heaven, but meaning calm and peaceful mind).
§ Ädeenava (seeing the fruitlessness and the danger of the 31 realms or the rebirth process).
§ Nekkhamma (losing attachment to “things” in the 31 realms, and working diligently towards
Nibbāna), which in turn leads to nissarana (stop this suffering-filled rebirth process) and thus
Nibbāna.
These are not clear-cut steps, but are guidelines.
1. Most people, irrespective of the religion, are generous and enjoy giving. Just like sīla below, dana
induces happiness in oneself.
2. In Pāli it is sīla (pronounced “seela”); in Sinhala it is “seelaya” (“sisil” means cooling down and
“laya” means heart, so cooled heart), and thus is a bit more explanatory.
§ Any act that makes one’s heart to cool down is an act of sīla, i.e., it is moral conduct.
§ When we act with compassion, say give a meal to someone hungry or help out an elderly
person to cross the street, it makes our heart cool down. On the other hand, when we do
something immoral or inappropriate, our heart gets agitated and the heart rate goes up, and the
whole body heats up; also see, “How to Taste Nibbāna“.
§ It is the same compassion, extended to other living beings as well, that makes up the basis of
the five precepts: avoiding any act that is harmful to any living being; see, “The Five Precepts –
What the Buddha Meant by Them“.
§ The humans are at a much higher “consciousness level” compared to animals, so we need to
pay special attention not to even hurt the feelings of another human being; see, “How to
Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma“. It is a good habit also to cultivate metta (loving
kindness) to all beings; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
3. When one gets to the Sagga stage, it is relatively easy to calm the mind. One starts feeling the
nirāmisa sukha (see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“) or the happiness of
“cooling down” by voluntarily “giving up” (and sharing with others) things that one used to be quite
possessive of. It is very subtle. One cannot just start giving everything that one owns; that will only
lead to paṭigha or internal friction. In addition, one has responsibilities and debts to pay; see,
“Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
§ Different people get “agitated” due to different “triggers”. This is because we have very
different sansāric habits: things we really like and things we really dislike; there are several
posts on these habits and “āsavas“. It is a good idea to make a self-assessment, figure out the
“bad triggers” and make an effort to remove them.
§ For example, if one has an “explosive temper” it is a good idea to make an effort to restraint
oneself and also to do metta bhāvanā. It is important to realize that the anger is within oneself;
it is not in an outside person or thing. I could get mad by thinking about person A, but there are
many other people who have loving thoughts about the same person A. Same with greed, it is
inside of us, not outside. These all originate from our sansāric likes and dislikes.
4. While it is hard for some to even start thinking about the ‘bigger picture” of the 31 realms, and the
possible suffering in future rebirths, some others may have thought about this “in the recent past in
the sansāric rebirths”, and thus may be motivated to explore more.
5. The last stage is for those who have “seen the big picture” and the dangers of staying “in this world
of 31 realms”, or at least have some inkling of it. When one starts feeling the nirāmisa sukha
strongly, and also start seeing the suffering to come in the lower realms, giving up the rebirth process
becomes an urgent need, instead of being anxious about “giving up rebirth”. Again, this cannot be
forced. One will feel it when one’s mind is ready.
§ This website has posts that could be helpful in any of the above categories. One needs to look
around and find the suitable topics; even though I have tried to put posts into different
categories, there may be posts suitable for anyone in any category.
§ My intention is to add material at all different levels, mainly up to the Sotāpanna stage of
Nibbāna. I hope that will help a wide spectrum of people and also illustrate that Buddha
Dhamma describes the ultimate natural laws not only about our human world, but of all
existence. Buddha Dhamma is not just a philosophical theory; one can actually experience the
improvement in one’s quality of life as one follows the Path.
September 13, 2016: I recently started a new section, “Living Dhamma” detailing a step-by-step
process on how to get started on the Path. One could get started even without belief in rebirth or the
existence of 31 realms. There we start by looking at the (hidden) suffering experienced in this life and
how to eliminate it.
6.1.3.4 What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream
“gati”) in our long journey through saṃsāra; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma
Vipāka.”
§ At the end of this human existence, the kammic energy of the kamma seed for the present life is
exhausted. At that moment, a new life starts off with a new potent kamma seed. The selection
of a new seed itself is a complicated process and depends on the potency of the available
kamma seeds, but it happens within a thought-moment.
Panñakkhandha – Not The Physical Physical Body
1. The pañcakkhandha or the five heaps (khandhas) that makes a being and “its world” are two inter-
dependent entities. One is rūpa (form), and the other is citta (pronounced chiththa). See, “The Five
Aggregates (Panñakkhandha)” for a details.
§ Citta can be crudely called thoughts, but a thought that we experience has billions of cittas in it;
see, “What is a Thought?.”
§ Rūpa is divided into two main categories of internal and external. The external rūpa constitutes
one’s outer world. The internal rūpa is not the physical body, but the very fine pasāda rūpa
(cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, and kāya) which do the “sensing” are located in the “mental body”
or the gandhabba: “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body.” The physical eye,
ear, etc. are like physical instruments that help gather data from outside; see, “Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya)” section for details.
Concept of a “Life-stream”
2. The combination of the two streams of citta and internal rūpa can be called a “life-stream”. A life-
stream is in constant re-generation, moment-to-moment: The cittas re-generate very fast (billions in a
second), and each citta has the other four heaps (vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa) associated with
it. So rūpa and citta represent the pañcakkhandha (rūpa, vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa). I am
simplifying this a bit to make it not too complicated.
§ In simpler terms, both internal rūpa and citta are re-generated billion times a second, but of
course visually appreciable “changes” occur over months or even years.
§ All external rūpa are “one’s whole world.” They arise and decay according to their nature, and
not at a fast rate like citta or internal rūpa; see, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought
Moments?.”
§ A citta rises and disappears in less than a billionth of a second, but there is a mental factor in
each citta called manasikāra that “remembers the contents in previous citta.” The two
psychological factors of manasikāra and cetanā are responsible for providing a sense of a
“person” who remembers the past; see, “Memory, Brain, Mind, Nama Loka, Kamma Bhava,
Kamma Vipāka.”
§ Our memories have been kept intact from the beginning-less time. Recently, evidence has
started emerging that some people can remember astoundingly detailed accounts of their
memories from many years back. See, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records
(HSAM).”
§ It is not possible to “store” all that information in the brain.
3. Citta flow like a river (many billions a second), and are in discrete packets (like quanta in quantum
theory; in fact, these are the smallest quanta anywhere in this world). Our internal rūpa also change
rapidly; this is why we change even moment-to-moment.
§ But the external rūpa change at different rates, some lasting very long times (a gold bar, for
example), while some change very fast.
§ But NOTHING in the world remains the same over long times; even our universe came into
existence some 14 billion years ago and will fade away in billions of years. Our Solar system
has a lifetime of about five billion years.
A New Existence Can Be Very Different
4. As mentioned in #1, internal pasāda rūpa and thoughts for the present life run non-stop until the
death (with some exceptions, like in the asañña realm). At the last thought-moment (called cuti citta,
pronounced “chuthi chiththa”), a new kamma seed comes into play; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma
Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“. Now both the rūpa and citta for the new life contain brand new rūpa,
vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa (i.e., a new pañcakkhandha); it is a “being” that may look
different, with its own “world.” For example, a “deva world” is very different from what we
experience.
§ The only things that are carried over to the new life are those kamma seeds, which contain the
“character” or “gathi” of that life-stream, and even those are in constant regeneration; at any
moment they could significantly change if the underlying conditions change.
5. Thus, at the moment of death, pañcakkhandha makes a quantum jump (meaning an instantaneous
large change).
§ Let us take an example. A man has a physical body, which is part of his rūpakkhandha (we will
make this as simple as possible). Other four khandha determine his mental state (vedanā,
saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa), where viññāṇa is roughly consciousness. Suppose he dies and is
born as an elephant. Now life-stream gets a new viññāṇa. The “new” physical body is different,
and his “new” consciousness level is much lower than a human’s, now at the base level of an
elephant.
§ But the set of kamma seeds (kamma beeja) all got transferred to this new existence (bhava).
Thus if there are many “good kamma seeds” there, there could later be a birth in a human or
even higher realm.
§ Normally, the rebirth takes place in a physically different location (New scientific evidence for
such “actions at a distance” are discussed in “Quantum Entanglement – We Are All
Connected“).
Caterpillar and Butterfly – Not the Same
6. Sometimes a life-stream changes its rūpa khandha while in the same physical location. One
example is the evolution of a butterfly from a caterpillar. A butterfly egg lays an egg. The egg hatches
and a caterpillar is born. It eats leaves and metamorphosis into a pupa that hangs like a small sack.
The final stage is a butterfly that emerges from that sack.
§ Now this butterfly is definitely not the pupa or the caterpillar or the egg. But it is not different
from any of the above either. It is the same life-stream. This is why both “soul” and “no-
soul” (or “self” and “no-self”) are wrong views. Many people incorrectly translate “anatta” as
“no-self” with the meaning of “no-soul,” which is WRONG; see, “Anatta and Dukkha – True
Meanings.”
7. Let us look at the caterpillar and the butterfly. The rūpa khandhas defining their physical bodies
are different. Their cittas are different too. One thinks about eating leaves, and the other thinks about
drinking nectar. The only commonality between the two lies in the kamma seeds (which also keep
evolving in a given life).
§ Now that lifestream may have kamma seeds for a human, deva, or a brahma too. But none of
those got “selected,” probably because they were less potent. So, a butterfly is likely to be born
in lower realms for very, very long times, before a less probable “human seed” being picked for
a new life in a rare statistical event.
§ In Buddha Dhamma — unlike in the “Big Bang theory” of current science — our whole
universe did not come to existence some 14 billion years ago. That requires a detailed
explanation, but let me just give a brief summary.
§ Stars like our Sun have lifetimes of several billion years. At the end of their lifetimes, some of
them blow up. Those explosions are supernovae in modern science. Even then, higher-lying
rūpa realms and arūpa realms survive. All living beings move to higher realms before the
destruction of the Earth.
§ After many billions of years, the “material Solar system” re-forms. Then most of those living
beings come back to the Earth as humans with very light “bodies” like brahmas. With time,
those “early humans” evolve into humans and animals with “denser bodies.” That is a reverse
evolution process, compared to Darwin’s theory.
§ Those details are in the Aggañña Sutta, and of course, current translations are way off. At some
point, we will discuss it in detail. What is important for now is that the beginning of any life-
stream has “no discernible beginning.”
13. In Buddha Dhamma (as well as in science) nothing happens without a cause: cause and effect. If
there was a beginning, who or what gave rise to that beginning? And then what caused “that”? That is
why “there is no discernible beginning.”
§ Thoughts are more complex than described above; see, “Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the
Subconscious.”
§ It is not possible to provide the “whole picture” in an a post or even several. You can use the
“Search” box on the top right to locate posts relevant to keywords.
§ For a more detailed discussion, see, “Manomaya Kāya – Introduction,” and the follow-up posts.
§ See also, “What is Mind? How do we Experience the Outside World?”
§ One may wonder where one’s memory is stored: see, “Memory, Brain, Mind, Nama Loka,
Kamma Bhava, Kamma Vipāka.”
More details in the new section on, “Origin of Life”
6.1.3.5 Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)
1. A normal human being can remember some “significant events” even from very early day’s of this
life. And these memories are not just a “summary”, but we recall a significant event in detail; it is like
playing back a video tape. We recall the whole scene with pictures sounds, the background,
everything. Just recall some past events and one can verify that for oneself.
§ There are many cases of “memories from past lives” reported mostly by children, but also by
some adults under hypnosis; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
§ Now there is scientific evidence that our memory records (called “nama gotta” in Buddha
Dhamma) are kept in minute detail somewhere and can be accessed at moment’s notice.
2. Strong evidence is beginning to emerge that there is indeed a “complete record” of one’s past (in
this life) just like a video tape. These studies started with Jill Price, who contacted a team of scientists
in early 2000’s about her ability to recall anything from 1974 onwards. Here is a video of her with
Diane Sawyer on an ABC News program:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: The woman that never forgets
3. Note that she says she can “see” what happened that day. It is not like she is recalling a “summary”
or the gist of what happened. She can actually “see” the whole episode. And the day and date comes
out effortlessly.
§ A team of scientists has studied her for five years and published a paper providing their
findings: A Case of Unusual Autobiographical Remembering-Parker-2006
§ She has written a book about her experience: “The Woman Who Can’t Forget”, by Jill Price
(2009).
§ Jill Price’s story led more people to come forward with their experiences, and ten more such
individuals have been studied in detail recently: WebLink: Behavioral and neuroantomical
investigation-LePort-2012.
4. These individuals have “highly superior autobiographical memory” or HSAM. They are not any
smarter than average people, according to those two papers above. They are just able to recall their
past much more extensively; they can focus their minds to any date in the past and “watch” what
happened: they can say what the weather was like, who they were with, whether any significant world
event took place that day, etc.
§ This phenomenon is also known as Hyperthymesia; see, WebLink: WIKI: Hyperthymesia.
Several other cases of HSAM are mentioned here.
5. Scientists believe that our memories are “stored” in the brain, in the synapses between neurons. I
firmly believe that they will be proven wrong. This research is still in infancy, but there has been an
explosion of activity within the past 15 years.
§ While it is true that synaptic wiring are responsible for habit formation (see, “How Habits are
Formed and Broken – A Scientific View“), it is a stretch to assume that “video-like recordings”
of all past events are somehow embedded in neural connections!
§ It is true that people without HSAM do have false memories (or have no memories) of past
incidents that were not significant for them. But their memories about significant/traumatic
memories are astoundingly accurate.
6. There are a couple of key significant facts that come out of these studies on HSAM subjects:
§ They can instantly access a “time slot” from many years back that is arbitrarily chosen by
someone else. They “re-visit” that time slot and describe, in real time, what took place with
details.
§ Since it has been confirmed in 11 subjects, it is not a “random event”.
§ It is a stretch to assume that all such details for a period of over 20 years can be stored in
biological membranes that regenerate undergo changes continuously.
§ It is not a matter of being able to remember. Jill Price describes extensively that it is hard for
her to remember any “learning material”; she was an average student.
§ Rather, it is a matter of just having a brain that is “wired” to be able to access the “video
recorder like” memory stream. It is not something one can develop by studying hard.
7. In Buddha Dhamma, a life of a sentient being is not restricted to the current life. As described in
the previous post (“What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“), any given sentient being has
been born an uncountable number of times, with no “traceable beginning”.
§ And a record of each of those lives is kept intact in the “mind plane”, and can be accessed to
different degrees by different people.
§ And people who develop abhiññā powers via jhānas (need to get to at least the fourth jhāna)
can develop Jill Price’s capabilities and more; they can go back hundreds to thousands to
billions of years depending on the level achieved.
8. According to Buddha Dhamma, the brain is just like a computer that helps extract these memory
records from the “mind plane”. The mechanism is similar to a television extracting a broadcast signal;
I will write a post on this later.
§ These memory records are called “nama gotta” (pronounced “nāma goththā”) and they go back
for eons and eons and even a Buddha cannot see a beginning; see, “Memory, Brain, Mind,
Nama Loka, Kamma Bhava, Kamma Vipāka“.
§ We can recall only bits and pieces even during this lifetime; this is because our minds are
covered by the five hindrances (panca nivarana); see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five
Hindrances“.
§ Ancient yogis who could get to the eighth jhāna could see all past lives in the present eon or
kalpa. But the Buddha could see numerous eons within a short time.
§ This is why it is mostly children who can remember past lives. As they grow up their minds get
“contaminated” more and more and these memories are lost. And those cases are different from
the HSAM subjects.
§ It appears that those individuals with HSAM have some of the capabilities of those who have
developed abhiññā powers. Since those with HSAM have been reported to have somewhat
different brain structure, it will be interesting to see whether those with abhiññā powers have
similar brain structures as people with HSAM. I believe that it is a matter of the brain wiring to
be able to “receive” more information from the “mind plane”.
9. Here is a video on amazing accounts of a few people with memory capabilities.
WebLink: youtube: The Boy With The Incredible Brain (Superhuman Documentary) – Real
Stories
§ More than anything else, they confirm the fact that memories are held intact in the mano loka or
the “mind plane”; see, “The Amazing Mind – Critical Role of Nāmagotta (Memories)“.
§ The brain is the interface between the base of the mind (hadaya vatthu) and mano loka; see,
“Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“. It is just that a few people’s brains can do better
in recalling those memories compared to others.
Next, “Buddhism without Rebirth and Nibbāna?“, ………
6.1.3.6 Buddhism without Rebirth and Nibbāna?
I participated in several internet forums on “Buddhism” over 2013 and a part of 2014. One thing that
clearly stands out is the fact that there are many people who like Buddhism, but they cannot
understand what the big deal is about rebirth, and they cannot comprehend what Nibbāna is. Thinking
is: Why can’t we have Buddhism without rebirth (because I do not believe in rebirth) and Nibbāna
(because that seems to be too complicated)?
They are turned off by the concept of rebirth and are mystified by the concept of Nibbāna.
§ Rebirth. I think that the first issue lies in the fact that most major religions are based on three
levels of existence: This life, and one of two eternal stages of life thereafter; committed to
either heaven or hell for eternity based on what one does in this life. That model is very simple.
Buddha’s 31 realms of existence with many “unseen beings” seems to be far fetched. Also, the
possibility of being reborn as an animal is an abhorrent thought similar to the one people had
about “evolving from the monkeys” before the theory of evolution.
§ Nibbāna. The second issue has become a problem mainly because of Mahayana doctrines.
Mahayana sect arose basically out of the philosophical analyses of Nibbāna by Nagarjuna,
Asanga and other Mahayana forefathers. They could not understand the concept of Nibbāna or
what happens to an Arahant when the Arahant dies. So, they came up with concepts like
sunyata (sunnata) or emptiness; see, “What is Sunyata or Sunnata (Emptiness)“.
1. There are two co-existing facets of Buddha Dhamma:
§ The Buddha said, “This Dhamma is unlike anything that the world has ever seen”. It really
needs a paradigm change to get into the “new perspective about this world view of the
Buddha”. One needs to be able to put aside all preconceived notions to understand the core
message.
§ However, the Buddha also said, “My Dhamma is good in the beginning, good in the middle,
and good at the end”. There is something to be gained from Buddha Dhamma for people who
just came to know about it. This is why I have separated posts into three categories on the site.
§ In Bhikkhu Bodhi’s book, “In the Buddha’s Words”, there is a chapter on “The Happiness
Visible in this Present Life”, where Buddha’s discourses to those who did not have aspiration to
attain Nibbāna, but were interested in pursuing moral lives, are described.
§ The concepts such as rebirth and Nibbāna are paradigm-changing concepts. But as one follows
what one understands, these concepts will become clear; I have summarized these two concepts
below. But it will take much more effort and reading many more posts if one is really interested
in understanding Buddha Dhamma.
2. For those who do not believe in rebirth, there is a simple way to get started without having to
believe in the rebirth process. I strongly suggest the following post: “Starting on the Path Even
without Belief in Rebirth“.
3. However, at the end — If one is to benefit fully from Buddha Dhamma — one needs to understand
its core message. And that core message is that this life is only but an insignificant time in the cycle
of rebirths that we have been on from eternity, and that “our world” is much more complex than we
see with 31 realms instead of the two (human and animal realms) that we see. Even more
significantly, the suffering in many of the lower realms of existence is much worse than that in the
human or even the animal realm.
§ That is a LOT of things to accept as a basis. But we are fortunate compared to those who lived
even a hundred years ago. Because now we have EVIDENCE to back up this wider world view
of the Buddha; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction”.
§ And both major Mahayana sects as well as Theravāda Buddhism believe in rebirth and the
concept of Nibbāna. All Buddhists (except the type of Stephen Batchelor, who has written
some popular books on Buddhism) believe in rebirth and Nibbāna. I have seen the label
“secular Buddhism” being used to describe those who like other aspects of Buddhism (basically
moral living and meditation), but not necessarily rebirth and/or Nibbāna.
§ Thus a Buddhist not believing in rebirth/Nibbāna is an oxymoron. The Pāli or Sinhala word
for Buddhist is “Bhauddhayā” meaning “a person trying the stop the rebirth
process” (“Bhava+uddha”). One meaning of Buddha Dhamma is “path or method of removing
bhava and thus stopping the rebirth process”. Buddha means, “one who has removed bhava
(and attained Nibbāna)”.
§ However, There is no need to forcefully accept rebirth, which gives rise to sansāric suffering.
One can start at a point where one can actually experience the other type of hidden suffering
in this life that most people can locate and remove: “Starting on the Path Even without Belief
in Rebirth“.
4. Therefore, one can be a “secular Buddhist”; that could be an intermediate state before becoming a
Buddhist. We just need to get the concepts clear. Since there is no formal established way to
declare oneself a “Buddhist” (or a need to do that), it is really in one’s own mind whether one is a
Buddhist or not. The Buddha clearly stated that each person is at his/her own level of understanding.
And there is no need to pretend; what one believes is what it is. The critical thing is to make sure
one is fully informed.
§ One does not become a Buddhist by reciting the precepts. One becomes a Buddhist gradually
as the mind embraces the world view of the Buddha and realizes that the real happiness is
attained by comprehending the true nature of this world: anicca, dukkha, anatta, and
eventually by stopping the rebirth process.
5. In the mean time, it is important to realize that certain wrong views are bound to have adverse
consequences according to Buddha Dhamma. Established (firm) view that there is no rebirth process
is one included in micchā diṭṭhi, which is one of the (strong) dasa akusala, that makes a birth in the
apāyas (four lowest realms of existence) possible. It is not necessary to firmly believe in rebirth, one
should at least leave that as a possibility. What is critical is not to have niyata (established) micchā
dithi.
§ Faith in Buddha Dhamma is different from that in other religions; belief in rebirth or Nibbāna
are not tenets. One either believes in them or one does not; see, “Is Buddha Dhamma
(Buddhism) a Religion?“. One MAY change one’s view after looking at the facts, and
especially if one can experience the release from one kind of suffering; see, “Starting on the
Path Even without Belief in Rebirth“
6. Finally, it will take a real effort to sort through all different versions of “Buddhism” that are out
there. Over two thousand five hundred years, just like now, people have tried to “mold” Buddha
Dhamma to a form to their liking, and that is why we have so many versions. But when that is done,
the uniqueness, the real message, gets lost. We need to keep intact this unique message, with the
understanding that not everyone comprehends it right away.
§ The key is to discard any version or aspect that does not provide a consistent picture. Buddha
Dhamma describe the laws of nature, and there cannot be any inconsistencies. That is what I try
to do with this website. If you see something inconsistent on the website, please let me know.
§ I use the Tipiṭaka (Pāli Canon) as the basis. It was written down over two thousand years ago
(by Arahants who had experienced Nibbāna), and is the oldest document encompassing the
three main teachings: suttas, vinaya, and abhidhamma.
§ I have documented the flaws in both Mahayana and (to a lesser extent) in current Theravāda
books by pointing out the inconsistencies with the Tipiṭaka. Also, I show that everything is self-
consistent, which is the scientific basis to illustrate the validity of a theory. Newton’s theory on
gravity had to be modified because they were not consistent with finer measurements.
§ It does not matter what we believe personally. We need to find the true laws of nature that the
Buddha discovered. Laws of nature, like gravity or laws of motion, do not care about what
we believe; see, “Why it is Critical to Find the Pure Buddha Dhamma”.
§ Buddha Dhamma (in its pure form) has withstood all tests to date; see, “Dhamma and Science –
Introduction”. Both current Mahayana and Theravāda teachings need to be revised back to the
original. It can be proven that there are self-contradictions within both sects in addition to
contradictions with the teachings of the Buddha. I have a series of posts that point out these
“problem areas” starting with, “Key Problems with Mahayana Teachings“.
Having established that rebirth and Nibbāna are the “lifeblood” of Buddha Dhamma, now we can
turn to the next question: What evidence is there to “prove” rebirth? What is the big deal about
Nibbāna, which sounds so esoteric?
A. REBIRTH
I have summarized some of the existing evidence for rebirth; see, “Evidence for Rebirth”. I am not
sure what will qualify for “proof”, but one thing is very clear: A strong case can be made for it. There
is evidence from many different areas, and that are consistent with the Buddha’s other teachings, for
example, the existence of a manomaya kāya; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body”.
§ If a person can believe even a SINGLE piece of evidence presented there, it is not possible to
explain that without accepting that there is a link between such two lives. Since there is no
physical connection between the two lives (that existed many miles apart), the connection must
be outside the physical realm, i.e., the mental energy. There is new evidence from “quantum
entaglement” that is consistent with the presumption that everything in this world is inter-
connected; see, “Quantum Entanglement – We Are All Connected“.
§ However, one can actually verify the rebirth process by developing abhiññā powers via
developing the fourth jhāna. One can then “see” one’s previous lives; see, “Power of the
Human Mind – Introduction” and the follow up posts. And there are some who have developed
such abhiññā powers, and this number can be expected to grow. When a significant number of
people can verify the rebirth process, it will be accepted. Today, not everyone has traveled
outside one’s own country. But everyone accepts that all those countries exist, because they
believe the accounts of those who have made visits.
§ And recent evidence confirm that there is indeed an unbroken memory record, at least in this
life; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)“.
B. NIBBANA
1. “Bāna” in Pāli and Sinhala means “bondage”; thus Nibbāna means becoming free of bondage (to
this world). We are bound to the unending cycle of rebirths via ten fetters called “sanyojana =
“san+yojana”; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“; yojana means bond.
Sanyojana is sometimes called samyojana.
§ The ten sanyojana (or samyojana) are removed via the four stages of Nibbāna: three at the
Sotāpanna stage, two reduced at the Sakadāgāmī stage and removed at the Anāgāmī stage, and
the remaining five removed at the Arahant stage.
§ Removal of the ten sanyojana also removes greed, hate, and ignorance from our minds; the
nirāmisa sukha increases step-wise at each of the four stages, and the “cooling down” or
“nivana” becomes complete; see, “How to Taste Nibbāna“. There are many synonyms for
Nibbāna, and nivana (or niveema) is one of them. The Sanskrit name “nirvana” does not
convey any of these meanings.
2. When the mind becomes pure, a being is simply not reborn anywhere in the 31 realms. The mind
has attained full release, and unconditioned happiness called nirāmisa sukha. Thus Nibbāna is
stopping the rebirth process; the suffering stops. it is as simple as that. That mind cannot grasp even a
fine form of a material body (which is subject to decay and death) anywhere in “the 31 realms”. The
mind becomes free of a body that is subject to decay and death (suffering). That is Nibbāna.
§ Have you seen any depressed Buddhist monks? They have given up the worldly pleasures
voluntarily, NOT with the mindset of a depressed person. Depression leads to hate; true “giving
up” is done with wisdom.
This is only a summary. All these are described in detail with supporting evidence at this website.
The key point is that EVERYTHING we observe, all we experience CAN be explained with the
complete “world view” of the Buddha of which rebirth and Nibbāna are essential foundations.
One does not need to know all that if all one needs is a peace of mind. One could follow the
basic guidelines for a moral life that the Buddha provided. However, his key message was that
this 100-year life can be only be compared to a “drop of water in a huge ocean” that is the cycle
of rebirths filled with suffering. Thus one should at least critically examine the evidence to see
whether that message needs to be taken seriously.
Introduction
1. There are six causes for things to arise in this world: lobha, dosa, moha and alobha, adosa, amoha.
§ Akusala kamma (immoral actions) done with lobha, dosa, moha give rise to births in the four
lowest realms or apāyās.
§ Puñña Kamma (moral deeds) done with alobha, adosa, amoha give rise to births in the human
and higher (good) realms.
2. However, births in good planes do not solve the problem of suffering for the long term.
§ That is because unless one still has hidden defilement (anusaya) and thus can act with avijjā
and taṇhā.
§ Therefore, when strong sense attractions become too tempting, one could do akusala kamma
with lobha, dosa, moha, and then be born in the apāyās.
Comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa
3. When one comprehends #1 and #2 above, one would have realized the anicca nature, which is the
following. Existence in any realm WILL NOT bring permanent happiness, or more correctly, it will
not REMOVE future suffering.
§ When one starts realizing the anicca nature, one will start “seeing” the dangers in continuing in
the rebirth process. And that comprehension will lead to the gradual “wearing away” of hidden
anusaya.
4. Puñña kammā are meritorious actions that CAN lead to rebirth in the higher realms. However,
when one does puñña kammā without any comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa, there could be asobhana
cetasika involved. (Especially greed at lower levels, possibly including a desire for something in
return for those actions.) Such actions would not count as kusala kammā, but they are still puñña
kammā.
§ Kusala kammā are actions that lead to the cleansing of the mind and help to stop the rebirth
process.
§ All kusala kammā are puñña kammā. But not all puñña kammā are kusala kammā.
5. That is why the Path is two-fold. When one starts, one will be on the mundane eightfold path and
will be doing puñña kammā.
§ When one switches to the Noble (Lokottara) Path as a Sotapanna Anugāmi (with
comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa), one’s actions will have more and more kusala components.
§ A big jump from puñña kammā to kusala kammā is when one attains the Sotapanna stage.
However, any trace of akusala component due to remaining avijjā will be completely removed
only at the Arahant stage. At that point (for an Arahant) such actions are called ”kriya” or just
activities.
§ For a discussion on the two paths, see, “Mahā Cattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great
Forty).”
Switching From the Mundane to Noble Eightfold Path
6. When one is on the mundane eightfold path, one knows the difference between moral and
immoral. Thus one will (try to) abstain from akusala kamma and will make an effort to engage in
puñña kammā (virtuous deeds).
§ That will help one keep away from rebirths in the apāyās, and be directed to rebirths in good
realms at or above the human plane.
7. With the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa, one will start switching to the Noble (Lokottara) Path. One
will begin realizing that anicca nature leads to dukkha, which in turn leads to anatta or helplessness
when born in the apāyās.
§ Then one will AUTOMATICALLY start doing moral deeds without any (hidden) expectation
of a “good return in terms of good birth.” That is because one has understood that even births in
the higher realms WILL NOT solve the problem of future suffering.
§ In other words, more and more PUÑÑA kamma will automatically become KUSALA kamma.
Kusala kamma are better than puñña kamma.
§That is a point that is hard for many people to understand. But it should not be difficult.
8. When one proceeds this way, lobha, dosa, moha will be removed in four stages: Sotāpanna,
Sakadāgāmi, Anāgāmi, Arahant.
§ By the time one gets to the Arahant stage, one has eradicated lobha, dosa, moha.
§ By that time, one has also removed alobha, adosa, amoha as well. One will do moral deeds
without any expectations for “good births.” That is because one would have seen the futility of
getting births in those good realms also.
9. Therefore, the removal of ALL SIX ROOT CAUSES leads to Nibbāna (Arahanthood).
§ However, since an Arahant still has a live physical body, previous kamma vipāka can result in
bring bodily pains like injuries or body pains or sicknesses. But any mental suffering would be
gone.
§ Then that Arahant attains Parinibbāna (full Nibbāna) when the physical body dies at his death.
§ AT that point, one attains full Nibbāna, and NO MORE SUFFERING will ever materialize.
10. It is essential to understand that Nibbāna IS NOT REACHED due to ANY causes. Nibbāna
results when all six root causes are REMOVED.
§ That is why Nibbāna is also called asaṅkhata, unborn, unmade, unconditioned, etc.
§ On the other hand, saṅkhata (things in this world) arise due to those six causes. Words like
born, made, conditioned, are associated with saṅkhata.
Pāli Word Analysis (Pada Nirukti)
11. We can see the difference between kusala kammā and puñña kammā by looking at Pāli roots of
those words. Kusala comes from “ku” + ”sala,” where “ku” refers to “kunu” or kilesa or evils, and
“sala” means “to get rid of.” “akusala” is the opposite of “kusala.” Kamma is an action.
· It is always good to know how Pāli terms originated (“pada nirukti”).
· Therefore, an akusala kammā is an action that defiles or contaminates one’s mind (one of dasa
akusala). Any kusala kammā involves an activity that leads to the removal of evils or dasa
akusala from one’s mind; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala).”
12. The word “puñña” is related to joy. The Sinhala word “pina” or “pin” is associated with
“pinaveema” or “making one’s heart joyful.”
§ Therefore, a puñña kammā is an action that makes one’s heart filled with joy. It is usually an
action out of saddha (faith in the Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha). Such activities may not
necessarily be kusala kammā, but some puñña kammā are kusala kammā too.
§ For example, when one offers food to the bhikkhus (or even to a hungry person) with joy in
heart, that is a puñña kammā because one does with pleasure. It will be a kusala kammā if one
has comprehended Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Ten types of puñña kammā are discussed in, “Puñña Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā.”
14. The simplest way to state the difference is to say that pāpa kammā are the worst of akusala
kammā.
§ Usually, pāpa kammā lead to rebirth in the apāyās. Ānantara pāpa kammā are the strongest,
and will even break the “bhava shakthi” in a human bhava. That will lead to rebirth in the
apāyās when the current physical body dies (even if more kammic energy remains in the current
human bhava).
§ Mild akusala kammā can only bring pavutti vipāka, i.e., those can bring difficulties and
sufferings during even a “good bhava” like a human bhava.
1. One can do immoral acts with the body, speech, and mind (leading to kaya, vacī, and mano
saṅkhāra); see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka.” Actually, one starts committing
mano saṅkhāra first, some of which lead to vacī and kāya saṅkhāra. These are called ten immoral
acts (dasa akusala). The ten immoral acts are divided into the three categories, as follows:
Three mano saṅkhāra (immoral acts done with the mind):
1. Abhijjā [Abhijjhā] (covetousness; greed for other’s belongings)
2. Vyāpāda (ill-will, hatred)
3. Micchā Diṭṭhi (wrong views)
Four vacī saṅkhāra (immoral acts done with speech):
4. Musāvāda (Lying)
5. Pisuṇāvācā (slandering)
6. Parusāvācā [Pharusāvācā] (harsh speech)
7. Sampappalāpa (frivolous talk)
Three kāya saṅkhāra (immoral acts done with the body):
8. Pāṇātipātā (killing)
§ An interesting book that talks about such hard to grasp ideas (in science) involving infinity is,
“The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World” by David Deutsch.
§ Therefore, we, meaning not only us humans but ALL sentient beings, are connected/related to
each other. This is why it is wrong to kill any living being, steal from anyone, verbally abuse
anyone, etc. Those are the foundation of morality. This is WHY it is not good to do any of
the ten immoral acts.
1. The Buddha said, “Cetana ham Bhikkhave kamman vadami,” i.e., “Bhikkhus, I say that kamma is
intention.” We always need to look at the intention to pinpoint whether or what kind of kamma was
committed.
§ Let us take an example: if someone shoots a dog that is attacking a child, one’s intention here is
to save the child. On the other hand, if someone is shooting a dog for “target practice”, then
there is no excuse. The life of a human is million-fold more precious than that of an animal;
see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma.”
§ Sometimes it is not possible to judge the kammic consequences just by looking at the particular
act. Only the person committing the act will know whether it is a good or bad intention. Thus
normally it is not wise to judge other people’s actions.
§ If it is a mano saṅkhāra (bad thoughts), the only person who even knows about that is the one
who is committing it.
2. In many cases, it is possible for others to “see” when one is committing vacī or kaya saṅkhāra. But
not always. Disciplinary actions against a child by a parent may appear to be kaya saṅkhāra
(spanking) or vacī saṅkhāra (verbal threats) , but the parent is likely to have good intentions for the
child in most cases.
Also, in many cases, it is not possible for any person to advice another on what to do when
conflicting issues are involved. Is it OK to steal some food to feed one’s own kids when they are
crying in hunger? Is it OK to spank a child when the child is misbehaving? Only the parent can make
that decision based on the circumstances.
Also see, “What is Intention in Kamma?.” This post has been updated on February 21, 2018, and
provides a simple two-step process to evaluate a given situation.
§ Relative weights of ten immoral acts are not easy to quantify. However, we can clearly see that
kāya saṅkhāra have higher “kammic potential” compared to vacī saṅkhāra if they are directed
to the same living being; hurting someone physically is worse than verbal abuse.
§ Another example: Say someone has hateful thoughts of a particular person all day long. That
could be worse than just saying something to that person and “getting the load off the mind”.
However, even that is not necessary. The best solution is to develop mettā (loving kindness)
towards that person and get rid of those hateful thoughts. We always need to realize that we all
are trapped in this constant struggle to find happiness in a world that is not set up to provide
lasting happiness; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta - Wrong Interpretations.”
2. Kammic consequences also depend strongly on the “consciousness level” of the living being
against whom the immoral act was committed.
§ Killing a human will have far stronger consequences compared to killing an animal. This is
discussed in the essay, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma.”
3. Dasa akusala and relative weights of different kamma are discussed in the following desanā:
WebLink: Download “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”
§ This desanā is in the post, “Root of All Suffering – Ten Immoral Actions,” where you can find
the relevant posts mentioned.
Related post: Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in Buddhism
Next, “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā”, ……………..
6.1.4.3 Puñña Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā
Revised March 24, 2016; September 14, 2017; major revision with title change April 27, 2018
1. Here we discuss the 10 types of puñña kamma (doing meritorious deeds). These can be divided
into three groups: dāna, sīla, bhāvanā.
§ Those are essential for progress in one’s mundane eightfold path.
§ One must cultivate the mundane path and remove the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi before being
able to comprehend the Tilakkhaṇa and start on the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha
Dhamma – In a Chart“.
2. The differences between kusala/akusala kamma and puñña/pāpa kamma were discussed in a
previous post: “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa Kamma“.
§ The ten types of akusala kamma were discussed in “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”.
The ten types of kusala kamma are just the avoidance of akusala kamma.
3. As discussed in the above two posts, kusala kamma (getting rid of raga, dosa, moha) eventually
lead to Nibbāna. However, puñña kamma (meritorious actions) help set the background to attain
Nibbāna, and thus are also critically important.
§ One needs to do both. However, the ability do kusala kamma is vastly improved when one
starts comprehending Tilakkhaṇa; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“.
§ One not only will be born in “good realms” with puñña kamma, but also one will be born with
good longevity, health, comfort, and wealth (ayu, vanna, sapa, bala) to be able to comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa and pursue Nibbāna with ease.
These ten meritorious actions (puñña kamma) are divided into three groups: däna (generosity), sīla
(moral behavior), and bhāvanā (meditation).
1. Meditation (bhāvanā)
2. Listening to Dhamma discourses (Dhamma savana)
3. Teaching Dhamma (Dhamma desanā)
4. Correcting one’s wrong views, especially on kamma (diṭṭhijukamma)
On the last one, see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
6. Therefore, dāna, sīla, bhāvanā constitute the “base” of a life of a moral person.
§ The “dāna group” helps one overcome one’s greed (lobha).
§ The “sīla group” helps removing hate (dosa) from one’s mind.
§ The “bhāvanā group” helps removing ignorance (moha) from the mind by learning Dhamma
and getting rid of the wrong views (micchā diṭṭhi).
7. Since Nibbāna is removing greed, hate, and ignorance from one’s mind, it is clear how these ten
actions pave the way for Nibbāna. As one engages in these activities more and more, the “cooling
down” or “niveema” can be experienced; see, “How to Taste Nibbāna”.
§ In the sīla group of activities, one starts by observing the five precepts, i.e., abstaining from
killing living beings intentionally, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, and getting intoxicated.
This last one is normally taken to be intoxication with alcohol or drugs, but it also includes
intoxication with money, beauty, power, position, etc.
8. It is always a good idea to keep in mind why these are to be moral actions: Because they help
purify one’s mind:
§ Most people, in order to avoid breaking the five precepts abstain from drinking, but do not
hesitate to show off their wealth, beauty, power, etc.; they are “drunk” too.
§ Others pay a lot of attention not to lie, but do not hesitate to gossip, slander, or verbally abuse
others.
§ Also one should realize that a human life has much more weight compared to an animal life;
see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma”.
§ Most of all, the tenth one is the most potent one that most people neglect to consider. Having
established wrong views (niyata micchā diṭṭhi) is a very potent immoral action, and thus one
needs to understand this clearly; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”.
9. This is why learning Dhamma has a prominent place in the bhāvanā section. As one learns the
deeper concepts of Dhamma gradually, wrong views are gradually removed. It is not enough to just
say, “I will not have these views anymore”, even though making such a determination is good. The
mind needs to see evidence to get rid of the wrong views it has. The feeling of the nirāmisa sukha
when one starts on the Path will make it easier to remove wrong views; see, “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?”.
accompanied with all three wholesome roots: non-greed, non-hate, non-delusion. So three-root
(tihetuka or “ti” + “hetu“) wholesome kamma is acquired.
§ On the other hand, if one performs a wholesome deed without any knowledge of Kamma and its
effects or the basic unfruitful nature of this world, he is doing it without any understanding.
Then the volition will not be accompanied by non-delusion, but only the two roots of non-greed
and non-hate. So two-root (dvihetuka = “dvi“+ “hetu“) kamma is acquired. These are less
meritorious compared to the three-root (tihetuka) kamma.
2. A detailed discussion can be found at, “A Simple Way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and Avoid
Demerits (Akusala)“. We will discuss these effects in detail in the Abhidhamma section too.
§ But it is important to realize that the strength of the kamma vipāka for a given meritorious act
will vary depending on the level of understanding. For example, while just writing check for
charity will have its results, much more stronger results will be gained by someone who spends
the same amount of money but involves more with giving by thinking about it before and
afterwards, and “getting involved” in the process, for example preparing meals for the hungry
etc.
3. To acquire this type of superior kamma, one should think of the moral action in advance and feel
glad for having the chance to do it. Again after performing the action, one should reflect on it and be
full of joy thinking about the good aspects of the deed. Furthermore, one can gain more merits by
doing a puñña anumodana or pattidana (transfer of merits to others, #2 kusala kamma above)
because this amounts to paying off sansāric debts; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation”.
§ On the other hand, if one feels lazy or reluctant or jealous or stingy before a moral action such
as giving charity, and regrets doing the moral action afterwards, then the moral volition of
giving to charity will be surrounded by other unwholesome intentions (cetana) and
consequently its potentiality will be weakened. The wholesome kamma acquired in this case is
inferior.
Thus is the importance of learning Dhamma in order to grasp such details and to realize the
full benefits one’s meritorious actions. Plus, it is interesting to see how all these details “fit into
the big picture”; see, “The Importance of Purifying the Mind”.
1. The five or eight precepts, of course with different meanings, were there before the Buddha. It is
said that on the day the future Buddha, Prince Siddhartha, was born his mother had observed the eight
precepts.
§ The ancient kings banned the so-called five immoral acts in order to maintain a peaceful
society. These were: killing (of probably other people), stealing, sexual misbehavior, lying, and
getting intoxicated.
§ The vedic Brahmins expanded these to include killing of animals. They also expanded to eight
precepts which enabled them to attain mundane jhānas.
§ By the way, except those referring to the God, the Ten Commandments also identify many of
these “immoral acts”.
2. Just like he did with many existing terminology at that time (kamma, the four great elements of
patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, etc), the Buddha adopted these precepts, but re-defined what he meant by
them.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, all possible immoral acts are included in the dasa akusala; see, “Ten
Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”.
§ Therefore, all those are in the five precepts too. When one truly understands Buddha Dhamma,
i.e., the nature of this world as embodied in anicca, dukkha, anatta, one sees that these precepts
come out naturally from the nature’s laws. At that stage, one’s mind automatically rejects all
dasa akusala and thus the five precepts are automatically obeyed; one does not even have to
think about them.
3. For one embarking on the Path prescribed by the Buddha, the conventional five precepts (killing
other beings intentionally, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, and intoxication) are a good start.
§ Furthermore, one needs to recite the five precepts with the understanding that it is not a promise
but one’s intention is to do the utmost (otherwise the act will itself be a musāvāda or a lie).
This is because anyone other than an Arahant is bound to break some of them per their
true meanings.
§ But as one proceeds on the Path and experiences the benefits (peace of mind or the early stages
of nirāmisa sukha), one should try to expand the scope of those five precepts from the
conventional meanings. This can be done systematically: when one truly understand the
meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta AND that our existence does not end with this life, one
begins to have a more deeper insight.
§ When that happens, the precepts are not followed as a ritual or a set of rules. Rather, one
realizes that there is no other moral way to live.
4. For example, when one realizes that one has been an animal or worse in previous lives, one stops
thinking of animals as “mere things” that exist for our pleasure. Furthermore, understanding the laws
of kamma i.e., taking any life has consequences will make one re-think of just wantonly taking
another life.
§ But some people go to extremes. They start treating an animal life on the same level as a human
life, and then freak out when they have to clear a spider web in cleaning their house. It is
inevitable that we will unintentionally kill many small creatures while walking on the ground or
even boiling some water. So, one need to get a sense of the relative weights of kamma; see,
“How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma?”.
§ What needs to be avoided first is those “pleasure killings” like fishing, hunting, etc.
5. Stealing is not merely acts like shop lifting, but also includes gains by immoral means. In order to
live a functional society, we have to do transactions with each other. We just need to make sure we
do not take advantage of another person and becoming “morally indebted” to that person.
§ Vinaya rules (“vi” + “naya” where “naya” is debt and vinaya is becoming free debts) in Buddha
Dhamma setup for the monks show how to live their lives by properly paying back for the
sustenance they get from the lay people.
§ When the Buddha said to test any act or concept with “Dhamma and Vinaya“, he meant that the
concept needs to be consistent with paṭicca samuppāda (cause and effect) and also consistent
with “rāga vinaya, dosa vinaya, and moha vinaya“, i.e., not getting into debt via greed, hate,
and ignorance.
§ If we gain from someone by unjust means, we will have to pay that debt if not in this life, but in
future lives; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation”.
6. The third precept, “kamesu miccacara veramani sikkha padan samadiyami”, is commonly
translated as “avoiding sexual misconduct”. But “kāma” is not just sexual activity; “kāma” includes
all sense pleasures that are available in the kāma loka. And “miccacara” (pronounced
“michchāchāra”) means “misbehavior” in the sense of “going to extremes”. Thus the real meaning is
to not to over-indulge in sense pleasures.
§ In fact, excessive drinking, gambling etc are included in this precept.
§ We have to use all our five physical senses to live in this world. But we need to have restraints
so that we do not abuse them to the extent that we will hurt ourselves or others. Even a simple
example of over-eating leads to health problems, which will hurt not only oneself but the whole
family.
§ The first three precepts include all three akusala kamma done with the body.
7. The fourth precept on musāvāda (lying) in Buddha Dhamma includes all abuses done my speech,
including harsh speech, slandering, and gossip which WILL harm oneself and others.
§ Thus the fourth precept encompasses all four akusala kamma done with speech.
8. The fifth is a big one that is almost always misinterpreted. If it included just drinking, it would
have been, “surameraya veramani……”. That was probably the original verse.
But in Buddha Dhamma it is, “surameraya majjapama dattana veramani……”.
In the word, “sura”, “ra” means “rāga” or excess greed, thus “sura” means with excess greed;
“meraya” is delicious. “Majja” means intoxication and “majjapama” is getting delayed via
intoxication. “Dattana” means that mindset. Of course, “veramani sikkha padan samadiyami” means
“I make a determination to avoid doing such things willingly”.
Thus it should be interpreted as, “avoid the mindset of getting intoxicated by alcohol, drugs, money,
power, etc”, anything that can make you “fall behind”:
§ All this happen in one’s mind. One gets intoxicated with greedy thoughts and when one
does not get one’s way with them, one generates hate. And all this happens because one does
not understand the true nature of this world, i.e., one has micchā diṭṭhi or wrong views.
§ To put it another way, one should be careful not to get intoxicated by the five sense inputs or
“kāma āsvada“; see, “What is “Kāma”? – It is not Sex“
§ One believes that either, (i) one’s actions will not have future consequences, and (ii) therefore,
one just needs to think about how to get what one wants (because there are so many tempting
things out there to be had!); one does not realize all that is temporary.
§ Thus in order to really obey the fifth precept one needs to start working on one’s mind.
All three akusala kamma done with mind are included in this fifth precept; see, “Ten
Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”.
9. The following scenario is given as an example to illustrate the futility of blindly following
precepts: There are many people who live their entire lives without intentionally killing, stealing,
engaging in sexual misconduct, lying, or getting intoxicated. But their minds are burdened with
greed, hate, or ignorance. Depending on the state of their minds, they may not even get a human birth
next time around.
§ There is this story about an old woman who followed those conventional five precepts to the
letter. Even though she was poor, she was greedy and kept all her money under her pillow. It is
said that she was reborn a louse (plural lice) on that pillow, because of her attachment to that
money in the pillow.
§ And if keeping those precepts will take one to Nibbāna, then a cow or a horse living in isolation
will be certain to attain Nibbāna. They do not kill, steal, lie, or get intoxicated, and if their
owners do not have any other animal of that kind, then there is no chance of sexually
misbehaving either.
§ It is all about purifying one’s mind. A pure mind gains wisdom, and will not allow any harmful
action by speech or by deed. Such a mind is not burdened, but has “cooled down”; that is the
happiness of Nibbāna.
10. Another good example (which also clarifies an aspect of micchā diṭṭhi) is described in the Mahā
Kammavibhanga sutta in Majjima Nikāya.
§ A brahmin by the name of Nigantanathaputta in the days of the Buddha was preaching that
everything happens due to kamma. He advised his followers to refrain from breaking the five
precepts, because that would INEVITABLY lead to the birth in the apāyas. He also preached
that if someone did not break even a single precept, that person WILL NOT be born in the
apāyas in the next birth.
§ The Buddha said that both were wrong. We have done both good and bad kamma in our
previous lives and the next birth will be determined by the relative strengths of those and what
we do in this life. For example, Angulimala, who killed nearly 1000 people, was able to attain
the Arahantship in a week. And Buddha gave examples of those lived a perfectly moral life, but
were born in the apāyas, because they had bad kamma vipāka from previous lives.
§ Furthermore, the Buddha said that if someone dies with such misconceptions, that is micchā
diṭṭhi and one WILL BE born in the apāyas just BECAUSE OF that micchā diṭṭhi. It is
critically important to figure out this point. I meet many people (even Buddhists) who say, “I
have not done anything bad to anyone; therefore, I do not think anything bad will happen to
me”. That is a micchā diṭṭhi. The only way to guarantee that one will be exempt from birth in
the apāyas is to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
Next, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“, ………
6.1.4.5 What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?
1. A key concept in Buddha Dhamma is cause and effect; nothing happens without a cause or a
reason.
§ But even if root causes are there, we can stop them from bringing their results by
blocking the CONDITIONS for them to come to fruition (a seed has the potential to bring
about a tree, but for that to happen the seed must be given a fertile soil, water, and
sunlight).
§ This is explained with simple terms in, “Working of Kammā – Critical Role of Conditions“.
§ This is why in paṭicca samuppāda, “paccaya” does NOT mean “it will happen”; see, “What
Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?“.
2. Nature enforces this cause and effect via five main absolutely unshakable laws (niyama dhamma or
sometimes called dhammata): kamma niyama, citta niyama, utu niyama, beeja (also called bija
niyama; but it is pronounced “beeja”), and dhamma niyama. We will discuss these in detail in
another post, but the point here is that kamma is NOT deterministic, other than for anantariya kamma
(killing one’s parents or an Arahant, injuring a Buddha, etc); everything plays out due to a complex
process involving all five niyama dhamma.
§ First of all, there are actions by individuals that lead to bad consequences right away: if one
jumps from a tall building, one is bound to get hurt or worse. This is a consequence of dhamma
niyama (law of gravitation is a dhamma niyama); here cause and effect can be easily seen.
Paṭicca samuppāda is the ultimate dhamma niyama; it explains how and under what
conditions kamma vipāka produces results.
§ When something appears in this world, it does not stay the same. It undergoes change
(viparināma) and is eventually destroyed. Thus anything in the world (a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala)) is subjected to the utu niyama. Whatever results that kamma vipāka may bring in,
they will also eventually go away.
§ Beeja (or bija) niyama is not relevant to the workings of the plant seeds as some books explain.
It dictates how kamma beeja (seeds) lead to their fruits (vipāka): a “puñña kamma seed” or a
“good seed” will always produce good results; and a “pāpa kamma seed” or a “bad seed” will
always produce a bad result. A Sotāpanna would have made all those kamma seeds, that make
it possible to have births in the apāyas, to be ineffective; thus a Sotāpanna will NEVER be born
in the apāyas.
§ Citta niyama involves laws associated with the working of the complex mind and that can
affect kamma vipāka in a major way; for example, by purifying the mind, one can attain the
Sotāpanna stage and thus make INEFFECTIVE all those kamma seeds that could lead to birth
in the apāyas.
§ Kamma vipāka are the root causes for all that happen in this world, but their effects can be
altered and even stopped by exploiting the other laws of nature. This is what a Buddha
discovers when he attains Enlightenment. All kamma vipāka are made ineffective by attaining
full Nibbāna or the Arahanthood.
The main point here is that most bad consequences can be avoided by understanding Dhamma, living
a moral life, and being mindful (yoniso manasikara).
3. In this beginning-less long journey of rebirths called saṃsāra, each of us have done an
uncountable number of both good and bad things. When we do a good or a bad act, the kammic
energy associated with that act gives rise to a seed, called a kamma seed. It is an energy (not a
physical thing) that stays with our minds until it gets a chance to come to fruition. Just like an apple
seed will not germinate and grow into an apple tree until the right conditions (soil, water, sunlight,
etc) appear, all our kamma seeds lie in waiting for the right conditions to appear, and at that time we
have to experience the result of that kamma or kamma vipāka.
§ Our kamma seeds (kamma beeja) are subjected to the beeja niyama mentioned above. In either
case, a seed gives rise to a plant or a vipāka according to the type of seed. Someone, who did
something bad that only an animal would do, will pay for that may be with a birth in the animal
realm; someone who did an act of generosity may get rewarded accordingly.
§ We can keep an apple seed (for example) in a dry, cool place for a long time; some seeds have
been kept for thousands of years. It will not germinate until we plant it in a fertile soil and
provide water and sunlight. In the same way, a kamma seed (good or bad) can lay dormant for a
long time until conditions becomes right for it to germinate. We all have accumulated numerous
kamma seeds over these repeated rebirths, and what we need to do is to provide conditions for
the good kamma seeds to germinate and NOT provide conditions for bad ones to germinate.
§ Thus kamma is the act AND kamma vipāka is the result of that act. But since the right
conditions need to appear for a kamma seed to “germinate”, the vipāka may not come
until later in the same life, next life, or even many lives later.
§ This is why it is not easy for people to see that their actions will have consequences. Kamma
niyama is not the only law that is in effect; there are four more as mentioned above and they all
work together. It is a very intricate network. In particular, because there is a citta niyama
(principle of thoughts), we also have some control over these kamma vipāka. We cannot
change any of the five niyama, but we can OVERCOME a cause (a power) due to a
niyama by building an opposing power.
4. We can take many steps to suppress the bad kamma vipāka coming to fruition and ALSO to get
those good kamma vipāka to come to fruition. As emphasized above, we all have basically
unlimited number of both good and bad kamma vipāka waiting to bear fruit. Rather than giving
in to bad vipāka and saying “what to do, this is my kamma“, we can find ways to suppress those. And
rather than saying “I must not have done any good kamma, and this is my fate”, we can probe and
locate those hidden good kamma seeds and cultivate them. Let us consider some examples:
§ If one does not take care of one’s physical body, it may become fertile ground for many bad
kamma vipāka to come to fruition. If we eat healthy and exercise, the body will not be
vulnerable to ailments or injuries.
§ The brain needs good food and exercise too. A healthy body and mind exercises such as solving
problems, even word puzzles, keeps the brain in good condition. But the best is meditation, and
vipassana or insight meditation is better than samatha meditation. For example, even if one’s
family has a history of Alzheimer’s disease, one can possibly avoid getting by keeping the brain
active and healthy.
§ One may be born to poverty because of a past kamma vipāka that came to fruition at the death
of the previous life. But this is NOT a reason to give up. Any person has an unlimited number
of good kamma vipāka waiting to come to fruition. It is true that a birth into a poor family did
not set up optimum conditions. But one has control over the citta niyama that was mentioned at
the beginning (see, “The Law of Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“). One
could use one’s mind to overcome this condition, and cultivate the background to achieve
success.
§ This is why the environment is critical to anyone. One needs to surround oneself with
optimistic, moral people, who will help cultivate the good qualities that lie dormant. At the
same time, one needs to avoid “bad company” that could pull one in the wrong directions. It is
not that any person is intrinsically good or bad; rather, at any given phase of life or even
through most of this life, some people may be displaying their “bad habits” that have come to
the forefront. Associating with such people, one will be affected in the negative way, bring up
one’s own bad habits (or “gathi” in Pāli or Sinhala).
§ The environment is CRITICAL for young children starting from the time when they are just
conceived in the mother’s womb. Even the fetus in the womb is affected by, say a loving
mother and father showing affection to each other or when the mother is being abused by the
father. It is critical to have a nurturing environment within the family and also in the school and
in any other activity. A significant part of an individual’s character could be molded by the first
10-15 years of life. That is the time they can acquire habits and once acquired, it takes a lot of
effort to change them. It is the duty of the parents to instill good habits: moral behavior, eating
well, exercise, associate with good friends, avoid bad friends, study well, etc.
5. It is also possible to remove many of one’s bad kamma seeds. When we acquire a “bad kamma
seed” we get indebted to another being. Just like one can be debt-free by paying off existing loans,
one can “pay back” old debts that have been accumulated in the cycle of rebirths by “transferring
merits” when one does good deeds, and also by doing the Ariya metta bhāvanā; see, “Transfer of
Merits (Pattidana)- How Does that Happen?” and “5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness
Meditation)“.
6. The world is VERY complex. Because all those five niyamas are acting simultaneously to enforce
the “cause and effect”, it is not possible to sort through each and every event in isolation and say,
“this is THE reason for this particular event”. There could be a dominant cause in some cases, but
most times it is a combination of several, and most those are from the past.
§ The main thing we have remember is that EACH and EVERY action by us will have
consequences (law of kamma). There is nowhere to hide; even if we can fool the law
enforcement sometimes, the nature cannot be fooled.
§ We need to make a concerted effort to get rid of bad habits and to acquire and cultivate good
habits. A habit can snowball into a sansāric habit, good or bad (related to law of citta and law
of beeja). Environment is an important factor in getting rid of bad habits and
acquiring/cultivating good habits.
§ We need to be constantly aware that there are zillions of kamma beeja (good and bad) waiting
to be germinated. We should not provide conditions for “bad seeds” to germinate (i.e., avoid
bad company, bad environment, etc), and provide conditions for “good seeds” to germinate
(i.e., study well, provide the necessary conditions to get a promotion or a job, and learn and
practice Dhamma so that whatever good thing that is forgotten comes to the forefront of the
mind). I am sure you can apply these principles to your own life; each one is different.
§ Then there are things that happen due to apparently random events: floods, hurricanes,
earthquakes, etc. These come under utu niyama: events that occur due to physical causes in the
environment. When those happen, thousands of apparently “unconnected” people may be
affected the same way. Again, this is partly due to the unimaginable number of kamma we have
accumulated in this beginning-less rebirth process. There is ALWAYS something from the
deep past that is going to MATCH any circumstance.
7. Finally, there is a misconception out there that one needs to get rid of all kamma (more accurately
kamma vipāka) in order to attain Nibbāna. This is completely false. One attains Nibbāna via
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 655
removing deep-seated defilements, called āsavas; see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“.
However, one could remove most of one’s bad kamma vipāka via cultivating Ariya metta bhāvanā;
see, #5 above.
Some of the main concepts are discussed further in the “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma
Vipāka“, “Habits and Goals“, “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of
Āsavas“, and other related posts.
Next, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“, ……………
6.1.4.6 How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma
In the previous essay, “Ten Immoral Acts (Dasa Akusala)“, we looked at the ten different types of
acts that will have bad kammic consequences.
1. First of all, the most potent of all is micchā diṭṭhi. The only akusala completely removed by a
Sotāpanna is the micchā diṭṭhi and in doing that he/she removes an unimaginably huge amount
of defilements; see, “What is the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“.
§ One critical problem many people have is that they try hard to avoid actions with relatively
small kammic consequences, while unknowingly doing things that have stronger kammic
consequences. Let us take an example: Suppose we have a large tank of water which is losing
water due to many holes at the bottom. Some holes are pin holes, some are a little larger, and
there are a few holes that are big and losing water fast. Obviously, one would want to plug
those large holes first. Then one would fix the medium-size holes and those pin holes are the
last to be fixed.
2. We can see that many akusala are with “acts” that are directed towards other beings, whether it is
done bodily, verbally, or just by thought. In principle, a being could be in any one of the 31 realms
(see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“).
3. The severity of the consequence of any misdeed (ie., kamma vipāka) involving another living being
depends strongly on the “level of existence” of the living being from lowest level of realm 1 (niraya)
to the highest at the 31st realm (fourth arūpa loka); Any “Ariya” or a Noble Person (who has attained
one of the four stages of Nibbāna), are at the highest levels regardless of the realm. A hurtful word
against an Ariya carries thousand-fold bad kamma vipāka compared to killing thousand ants.
§ See, “What is Intention in Kamma?“. This post has been updated on February 21, 2018, and
provides a simple two-step process to evaluate a given situation.
4. It is difficult to identify whether a given human is just an immoral human or an Arahant by just
looking at that person. Human realm is unique in many ways.
Thus, we can try to sort out the kammic consequences of a given immoral act on the “level of
consciousness” of the being that act was directed to:
§ Regardless of the realm, the highest four levels are Arahant, Anāgāmī, Sakadāgāmī, and
Sotāpanna. Humans can attain all four levels.
§ Out of the 31 realms we can directly experience only the human and animal realms. Thus,
normally we need only to evaluate how our actions affect other humans AND animals.
§ Since any animal is inferior to any human, we need to pay special attention to how we interact
with other human beings.
§ In particular, it is not possible to judge whether a given human has attained a Nibbānic state.
Even by directing hurtful words to an Ariya (one who has attained at least the Sotāpanna stage),
one could be acquiring thousand-fold more bad kammic potential compared to doing the same
to a normal human.
§ In some cases, even the person in question may not know that he/she is a Sotāpanna. There may
be “jāti Sotāpannas“, i.e., those who had attained the Sotāpanna stage in a previous life and
thus born as a Sotāpanna, and may not realize it.
§ Thus we need to be very careful with dealing with fellow humans in particular.
5. When we say killing is immoral it is implicit that killing is taking the life of any living being. But
killing a human has a kammic consequence that is much higher compared to killing an animal. Killing
a Sotāpanna has a even more drastic consequences, Sakadāgāmī even higher, Anāgāmī even higher,
and killing an Arahant will have the highest, and is of the strongest kind at par with killing a parent
(an anantariya kamma that will cause the very next birth in an apāya).
6. Similarly other immoral acts will have consequences depending on the “consciousness level” of
the living being. It is not a matter of one particular living being is “better” than another.
§ Rather it is a matter of how valuable that “level” is, and how difficult it is to attain that “level”.
One has been born a human because of the merits one has acquired in previous lives; it is
extremely difficult to get a human birth as we will discuss in a separate post; see, “How the
Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
§ One becomes a Sotāpanna by cultivating moral behavior and by purifying one’s mind; thus a
life of a Sotāpanna is much more valuable compared to a normal human being.
7. Even among humans who have not attained any Nibbānic state, there are “different levels of
consciousness”: One who has more wisdom (paññā) is at a higher level than one with less wisdom.
§ Here wisdom does not mean book knowledge, but knowledge of Dhamma; understanding of the
true nature of “this world”, or anicca, dukkha, anatta. Thus the possibility of that person
attaining a Nibbānic stage is more likely, compared to one who has less wisdom.
8. Another important thing is not to worry about things that one does not have any control over.
Everyday, we kill so many small animals unintentionally: stepping on them while walking, cleaning
the yard, cleaning the house, and even while boiling water.
§ We need to remember that “kamma is intention”. We are not boiling water to kill any unseen
life forms, rather we boil water to make sure we do not get sick by drinking contaminated
water.
9. It is not even possible to live “in this world” without harming other beings unintentionally, even
though we may be aware that our acts may lead to the destruction of many life forms.
§ Once a bhikkhu who had developed abhiññā powers was getting ready to drink a glass of water,
and with his ability to “see” finer things saw that there were numerous microscopic beings in
the water glass. He tried to filter them out, but they were too small. The Buddha then explained
to him that it is not possible to live without doing things that are necessary to sustain one’s life.
§ In another example, suppose one has a wound; if left alone it could lead to one’s death. Thus
one needs to apply medication to the wound. However, that wound is infested with numerous
microscopic living beings, and they will be killed by the medication.
§ Walking on the ground (especially grass) kills many insects; but we cannot live our lives
without going places. What matters is our INTENTION. When one is walking, there is no
intention of killing living beings.
10. What we need to do is to be careful not to do any harm to even the smallest of the creatures with a
hateful or greedy mind. It is the intention, or the state of the mind, that counts.
§ There is this story about an old woman who was very careful about not breaking the five
precepts. But she was extremely greedy; she was quite stingy, did not give much to charity, and
kept all her money under her pillow. Because of that greed, she was born a peta (a hungry
ghost).
§ It is relatively easy to keep the five precepts. What is harder is to purify one’s mind of greedy,
hateful, and ignorant thoughts. This is what needs to accomplished in true “ānāpānasati
bhāvanā“; see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
§ Even though we may not be greedy or hateful in this life, we may have acquired such bad
kamma in previous lives. This is why the Buddha said even if one lives morally in this life that
does not guarantee a good rebirth unless one has attained the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna; see,
“Why a Sotāpanna is Better off than any King, Emperor, or a Billionaire“.
§ Buddha Dhamma is all about the mind. Purifying the mind is the key, not just to follow set
rules. Just following precepts will not be enough.
11. Finally, it is important to remember that hate is worse than greed. Excessive hateful actions lead
to rebirth in the lowest realm, the niraya. Excess greed lead to rebirth mainly as petas (hungry
ghosts).
§ Mixture of hate and greed lead to rebirth in all four lowest realms, the apāyas. Even if one does
not carry over the hateful or greedy thoughts to speech or bodily actions, they still count
especially if one thinks about them most of the time.
§ This is why it is important to develop good meditation habits; see, “Bhāvanā (Meditation)“. A
mind free of hate and greed becomes less agitated and peaceful; then it leads to wisdom
(paññā).
More details on weights of different kamma at: 12. Key Factors to be Considered when “Meditating”
for the Sotāpanna Stage. Also see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
Next, “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)”, ..
6.1.4.7 Account of Angulimāla – Many Insights to Buddha Dhamma
Introduction
1. Angulimāla had killed 999 people, but was able to attain the Arahanthood within a few weeks after
meeting the Buddha. His life story can help us understand how and why even vipāka for such highly
immoral deeds can be overcome.
§ Even though laws of kamma play an important role in Buddha Dhamma, one can overcome the
consequences of such highly immoral actions. That is by comprehending the more fundamental
principle of causality: one can bypass all such kamma vipāka (all future suffering) by
getting rid of avijjā and taṇhā (the root causes).
§ The following two posts also discuss kamma and kamma vipāka: “What is Kamma? – Is
Everything Determined by Kamma?” and “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma“.
2. I highly -recommend a fairly good account of the life story of Angulimāla here: “WebLink:
accesstoinsight.org: Angulimāla – A Murderer’s Road to Sainthood“.
§ Reading that account first will help with the discussion below.
§ The teacher finally believed those false accusations and came up with a way to get Ahimsaka
killed. When Ahumsaka finished his studies and asked how he can pay for his education, the
teacher said: “You must bring me a thousand human little fingers of the right hand”.
§ That is how Ahimsika became a killer and came to be known as “Angulimāla”, because he
started wearing some of those cut fingers in a garland around his neck.
4. Angulimāla had killed 999 people and was about to kill his mother to get the last finger, when the
Buddha intervened.
§ The quick-witted Angulimāla was able to comprehend a few verses that the Buddha uttered and
asked the Buddha to ordain him right there.
§ Ven. Angulimāla became an Arahant soon afterwards.
§ Later on, the Buddha reminded Ven. Angulimāla that he had now been “born” an Āriya (Noble
Person), even though he had killed so many people when he was a murderer. This concept of
changing “bhava” even during a given existence is discussed below.
First Observation – Importance of Gati and Environment
5. The first thing we can see is that obedient and well-behaved Ahimsika became a murderer because
of his teacher’s influence. External influences (family, friends, etc) can be a key factor in changing
one’s gati (pronounced “gathi”) loosely translated as “character”.
§ This is why parents must always be on the lookout on what kind of friends a child has. Friends
can be a huge influence on a child.
§ This is also true for adults. One must get away from those who pull in wrong directions, and
make new associations along “good directions”.
§ Gati are discussed in many posts at this site. One can find a list of relevant posts by entering
“gati” (and “gathi” since I have used both) in the “Search” box on top right.
Second Observation – There is no “unchanging self“
6. The second thing we can see is that there is no “unchanging self“.
§ Harmless Ahimsika became a violent murderer in Angulimāla and killed almost 1000 people.
§ Then that violent Angulimāla the murderer became a Noble Person within a short time after
meeting the Buddha, and within weeks Ven. Angulimāla became an Arahant too!
7. In the “bigger picture” of the “three lokas” and “31 realms”, we saw that the “lifestream of any
living being” can change from “good to bad”, “bad to good”, “good to bad again”, etc an
uncountable times in the beginning-less rebirth process.
§ We all have been in the highest brahma realm and the lowest apāya too. But we all have spent
most of that time in the suffering-filled apāyās.
§ The only way get out of this “ceaseless wandering in the rebirth process (sansāra or samsāra)”
is to become an Arahant, as Ven. Angulimāla did.
§ The first step is to attain the Sotāpanna stage be free of at least the four lowest realms (apāyās).
§ Ahimsika did not become Angulimāla without causes. Those causes were the influence of his
peers on the teacher and the influence of the teacher in turn on Ahimsika.
§ But then all that was reversed due to the influence of the Buddha.
9. That is why it is also incorrect to say, “there is no-self”. There is a always a “self” — living at least
momentarily — that is responsible for how that “self” evolves in the future.
§ But that “changing self” can and will change between “good’ and “bad” based on many factors.
Key factors are: self’s own deeds and external influences on that “self” at any given time.
Fourth Observation – Two Types of “Bhava” or Existence
10. Another important point is that one could be born in a “temporary bhava” or “temporary
existence” DURING this life. As we saw, Angulimāla switched “temporary bhava” from an innocent
boy to a murderer, and back to an Arahant!
§ For example, a person who drinks habitually is not drunk all the time. He is in a “drunken
bhava” or “drunken existence” while he is intoxicated. The next day he is sober and would not
be in a “drunken bhava” until he drinks again.
§ In the same way, one is in an “angry bhava” when she gets angry. But after the anger subsides,
she is not in that “existence” or “bhava” anymore.
§ These temporary bhava are explained via “pavutti Paṭicca Samuppāda” processes (those
effective during a given life) . Even though only one type of Paṭicca Samuppāda is presented in
the text books today, there are different types.
11. When one habitually gets into such a “temporary bhava” repeatedly, then that becomes a
cultivated gati or habit/character.
§ In that case, it could lead to a new “uppatti bhava” (or “bhava associated with rebirth”) too. For
example, when one gets angry all the time and then one day kills a another human, that could
lead to rebirth in an apāya. That is a “more permanent bhava” that can last a long time.
§ This is the Paṭicca Samuppāda cycle that is discussed more commonly. It is called “uppatti
Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ The section on “Paṭicca Samuppāda” is a must read.
16. Secondly, until a Buddha comes to the world, it is not known hot to escape from this endless
rebirth process filled with suffering.
§ There have been and there will always be teachers who realize that misdeeds lead to bad
rebirths and good deeds lead to good rebirths, and teach that to others.
§ But it is only a Buddha that can figure out that doing good deeds is not enough. One needs
to see the anicca nature of this world of 31 realms. That means even if one gets a rebirth in
the highest realm with long lifetimes of billions of years, one will end up in despair and
eventual death.
§ Then one gets back to the same cycle of rebirths, where one will inevitably do bad deeds (due
to cravings or sense temptations) and will be born in the apāyās.
Eighth Observation – The Root Cause for Suffering
17. Therefore, the key is to realize that one needs to REMOVE the tendency to be tempted by
sense desires.
§ One needs to “see” that anicca nature, i.e., it is a waste of time to seek happiness in this world.
That will sooner or later lead to rebirth in the apāyās (dukkha). Therefore, in the end one will
become helpless (anatta), when born in an apāya.
§ It is not possible to forcefully suppress cravings under “strong sense temptations”. When
one sees the “anicca nature” cravings are automatically removed (in four stages of
Nibbāna).
§ That really is the Second Noble Truth the cause of future suffering.
Ninth Observation – The Way to Nibbāna
18. Once the “big picture” of the 31 realms — together with how one WILL BE born among them
due to one’s actions (kamma) — is understood, one would have removed the 10 types of micchā
diṭṭhi.
§ That is because, that “complete picture” requires the rebirth process, laws of kamma, etc.
19. Then one can begin to understand the “unfulfilling and dangerous nature of the wider world of 31
realms” or the “anicca nature”.
§ That “anicca nature” explains how “dukkha” or suffering arises, and one will become helpless
(anatta) in the rebirth process. Those are three main characteristics (anicca, dukkha, anatta)
that are called Tilakkhaṇa (and they are inter-related).
20. This is why anicca has nothing to do with “impermanence” and “anatta” has nothing to do
with a “self” or a “non-self”.
§ That knowledge about Tilakkhaṇa or the “true nature of this world” is available only in Buddha
Dhamma.
§ Until a Buddha comes to world and DISCOVERS that “bigger picture”, no one will be able to
see that “bigger picture” and the dangers in remaining in this cycle of rebirths filled with
suffering.
Tenth Observation – Kamma Vipāka Will be Effective Until Death
21. Even though Ven. Angulimāla had attained the Arahantood, he was constantly getting injured by
“stone throwers”. Most of the time, those were not directed at him, but he was getting hit
accidentally.
§ As described in the above essay, “with blood running from his injured head, with his bowl
broken, and with his patchwork robe torn, the venerable Angulimāla went to the Blessed One.
The Blessed One saw him coming, and he told him: “Bear it, brāhmanā, bear it, brāhmanā!
You have experienced here and now the ripening of kamma whose ripening you might
have experienced in hell over many a year, many a century, many a millennium .”
§ If Angulimāla died without being saved by the Buddha, he would have suffered in the apāyās
for an unimaginable time for killing all those people!
22. As we had discussed before, even a Buddha cannot avoid some of kamma vipāka from the past as
long as the physical body is alive. The conditions for those kamma vipāka to materialize (i.e., the
physical body) is still there.
§ At the death of the physical body, there is no ore rebirths anywhere in the 31 realms. Then,
there is no way for any kamma vipāka to materialize (come to fruition). That is why the
physical death of an Arahant is called “Parinibbāna” or “complete Nibbāna“.
§ There will be absolutely no suffering after the Parinibbāna.
23. Therefore, we can see that there are many insights in some of these accounts of notable
personalities in the Tipiṭaka. They are all consistent with the core teachings.
6.1.4.8 The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)
I used to have this post titled, “The Four Factors of Accomplishment”. I changed it because those
words do not do justice to these four mental qualities. They are called satara Iddhipada in Pāli or
Sinhala, meaning factors that are critical to accomplishing any goal, whether mundane or
transcendental.
§ Iddhi is conventionally taken to mean “magical” powers. Those yogis who could see things that
are far away, hear sounds that are far away, read minds of others, etc., were supposed to have
iddhi powers. They acquired those powers by harnessing the power of these four factors to
KEEP THEIR DEFILEMENTS SUPPRESSED.
§ When one works towards attaining Nibbāna, one can use the same factors to REMOVE
defilements from the mind.
§ One could use the same factors to attain mundane goals, such as achieving financial
independence, excelling in academics or a sport, improving health, etc.
They are chanda (liking, but close to an obsession), citta (thoughts), viriya (effort), and vimansa
(analysis). Chanda is NOT greed, it is the determination to attain a goal.
§ Any innovator, business person, scientist, architect, in fact anyone who is an expert at his/her
occupation, knows these factors are critical, even though they may not have thought about
them.
1. One needs to have an liking (more like an obsessed liking) for the project; this is called chanda
which we can translate as liking. It is not greed, but pure in quality and grows to become a life goal.
2. When one has this “obsession”, one keeps thinking about it all the time. When one gets up at night
to go to the bathroom, one thinks about it; it is the first thing that comes to mind when one wakes up.
This is called citta; we will call it thought or contemplation.
3. Thus one makes one’s best efforts (viriya) to achieve the goal. This is what makes swimmers get
up early morning to do laps, a scientist/innovator forgets about his/her meal, an innovator stays
awake thinking about how to make improvements to his products, etc.
4. One is always on the lookout for any faults or possible improvements in current efforts. If the
concepts involved do not make sense, one is always looking for a better explanation, a better way to
make something, etc. This is reasoning/investigating (vimansa).
§ These factors are mutually supportive of each other. Because of this, once getting started
(slowly), they can lead to explosive growth; these factors feed on each other, and the project
becomes self-sustaining. This is called exponential growth. Thus it is hard to calculate the time
taken to finish the project by linear extrapolation.
§ The same is true for someone starting on the Path. Initially, it takes time to absorb the concepts.
But IF THE CONCEPTS ARE CORRECT (i.e., no contradictions), then progress is made very
quickly. The principle of paṭicca samuppāda starts working and one will be attracting resources
that will help in ways one would not have even thought about; see, “The Law of Attraction,
Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“.
I know this by experience both as a scientist and now as a follower of the Path. After working for
over four years, up until 2013, I had made only slow, steady progress on the Path. But I progressed
enough that I kept looking for better explanations, discarding many things on the way. Since the
middle of 2013, the growth exploded. That is when, just by the law of attraction (see, “The Law of
Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“) I came across the pure Dhamma.
§ By the way, this is process the Buddha called bhāvanā (meditation). One keeps contemplating,
clarifying, investigating, etc. it all the time, i.e., “Asevitaya, bhavithaya, bahuleekathaya,…..”.
§ One can be meditating in all four postures: sitting, standing, walking, and lying down (on a
bed). Of course one can concentrate better sitting down in one of the more formal sitting
postures.
Deeper Meanings when Cultivating the Noble Eightfold Path
See, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power” for an anlysis based on Abhidhamma.
1. Chanda (cha + anda, where “cha” is mind and “anda” is “anduma” or clothes) means wrapping
one’s mind with appropriate “attire”, which here means sammā vaca, sammā kammanta, and sammā
ajiva. This is what fuels the “liking” for Nibbāna with increased nirāmisa sukha.
§ By the way, a different meaning of “anda” (blind) is implied when chanda is used in
“kāmachanda” (= “kāma” + “cha” + “anda”), i.e., mind blinded by kāma or sense pleasures.
2. Citta here means the mindset to attain Nibbāna.
3. However, even if one has liking and mindset on attaining Nibbāna, one needs to make an effort or
viriya.
4. Even if one is exerting effort, it needs to be directed in the right direction. Thus one needs vimansa
(investigation/reasoning) to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta, and to get to sammā diṭṭhi.
5. “Iddhi” means “grow”, and “pada” means “headed direction”. Thus with iddhipada one is
accelerating in the direction that one sets one’s mind. Thus all four factors of chanda, citta, viriya,
vimansa need to be there.
Next, “Why is it Necessary to Learn Key Pāli Words?“, …
6.1.4.9 Why is it Necessary to Learn Key Pāli Words?
Original written before October 23, 2015; Revised March 4, 2017; October 8, 2018
I had not given this issue much thought until someone at an online forum pointed out in 2014 that I
was using too many Pāli words and it was difficult to understand the meaning of those terms. This is
an important point that has two aspects:
§ In the Arana Vibhanga sutta, the Buddha advised bhikkhus to explain the Dhamma by
providing the MEANINGS and not to emphasize a given language. As long as one
comprehends the concept, it does not matter what language is used.
§ On the other hand, we need to have a way to transmit the key foundational words for future
generations without distorting the meaning of such words. And it is difficult to find suitable
words in other languages for key words like anicca, anatta, and paṭicca samuppāda.
§ I have explained the meaning of any Pāli term I use. But for a first time reader, this could be a
legitimate issue. Please use the “Search” button on the top right to locate relevant posts for any
key word. There is a “Pāli Glossary (A-K) and Pāli Glossary (L-Z)” too.
1. Buddha Dhamma is the most complex theory in the world; it encompasses all of nature’s laws.
Even though its basic premises are not hard to grasp, if one needs to dig deeper, one needs to spend
some time “learning the basics”, or the “fundamental ideas involved”.
§ Think about it this way: Can one learn algebra without knowing arithmetic?
§ The key is to learn the basic ideas well, words like anicca, anatta, bhava, etc. It is said that one
could understand the Buddha’s message about existence just by comprehending anicca (which
will lead to understanding of dukkha and anatta), and that is true.
§ But that is not possible if anicca is translated to English as just one word: impermanence. The
Pāli word anicca means much more than just impermanence. So, it is better to the word anicca
and to learn what is meant by that word.
§ Viññāṇa is another word like that. It should not be be translated just as “consciousness”; it is
much more complex; see, “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
2. There is another aspect too. If one learns the basic concepts in addition/subtraction or even
quantum mechanics, it does not matter what language one uses to learn it. The key is to get the IDEA,
not just learn the words. One can learn addition/subtraction or quantum mechaincs in ANY language,
not by memorizing words but by understanding the key concepts.
§ When a child learns how to add/subtract, he/she has to learn the basic multiplication table and
the procedures on how to use that knowledge in handling big numbers. After that he/she can
solve any arbitrary problem involving big numbers.
§ In the same way, one needs to get the IDEAS embodied in some key Pāli words, because many
of those Pāli words CANNOT be directly translated into other languages: They are highly
condensed, each word packed with deep meanings.
§ In quantum mechanics, the word “quantum” embodies the subject; regardless of the language
one uses, one knows what a quantum is. In the same way, one needs to know what “anicca” is.
There is no other word for it in English.
§ Once one UNDERSTANDS the meaning of a certain key Pāli word, then one may even be
able to find a suitable word in any language to keep it in mind. There is no need to
memorize Pāli words for the sake of memorizing. It is similar to learning any concept.
§ We just should not change the original Pāli words in the Tipiṭaka. That is the “blueprint” that
need to be transmitted intact so that Buddha’s original message will be kept intact.
3. Let us first examine the reasons why Pāli is a special language.
§ The Buddha delivered his discourses in Maghadhi language; a version of that language suitable
for memorization (Pāli) was used to SUMMARIZE those suttas. For example, Dhamma Cakka
Pavattana Sutta was delivered to the five ascetics overnight. How many pages would it take to
write all that down? Yet, it was condensed into a few pages.
§ In the old days suttas were orally transmitted generation-to-generation, and that was the other
reason to condense it into a special form like a poem that is easy to remember and recite. The
origin of the word “Pali” comes from that particular way of organization of the words.
4. Therefore, it may take several words in a different language to express the meaning of some Pāli
words like anicca, anatta, bhava, etc. Paṭicca samuppāda is another whole phrase that is best kept
intact and just learn what is meant by that phrase; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda”“.
§ Thus most Pāli words are impossible to be translated word-by-word to other languages. There
is a system to glean the true meanings of the suttas as well as the deep subject of paṭicca
samuppāda; see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ This is the reason that many commentaries were written in the old days to explain the meaning
of key words and phrases; see, “Preservation of Dhamma“ for details.
§ Unfortunately, most of those original commentaries (Sinhala Attakatha) cannot be found today,
except for three; see the above post.
5. Most of the problems we have today are due to such “word by word” translation of suttas into
other languages.
§ The most visible and disastrous translations are the translation of the words anicca and anatta
into Sanskrit as anitya and anathma; these words were then ADOPTED in Sinhala language to
express the meaning of anicca and anatta. Then within the last two hundred or so years, those
Sanskrit words were directly translated to English and now have become established to mean
“impermanence” and “no-self”; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early
European Scholars“.
§ Incorrect translation of just those words have kept the message of the Buddha hidden for over
fifteen hundred years. It is not an accident that there have not been that many Arahants during
that time.
§ For the correct meanings of these words, see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong
Interpretations“ and the follow-up post.
6. In fact it is said that one can reach the Sotāpanna stage by just comprehending the true meanings of
anicca, dukkha, anatta, the three characteristics of the world. These three words have embodied in
them a very broad message. Whole suttas were delivered to describe what was meant by those words!
It is WRONG and DISASTROUS to just translate them as impermanence, suffering, and “no-
self”.
§ But if one wishes, and knows the correct interpretations, one can dig much deeper to
unimaginable depths. For example, there is a process involving 9 steps where a given citta
starts off as a pure (pabhasvara) citta and gets “contaminated” before getting to the
viññāṇakkhandha stage within within a billionth of a second!
§ Those are discussed in detail at, for example, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought
(Citta)” and “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga“.
§ However, there is no need to go to that depth for most people (and many will not have enough
time to do that anyway; but there could be a few who would really enjoy it).
§ I just want everyone to appreciate Buddha Dhamma for what it is, and to help remove many
misconceptions that are out there today.
7. To summarize, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of UNDERSTANDING the
meanings of key Pāli words. It may take some time to truly grasp those meanings. I keep
revising those key posts, whenever a better way to express an idea comes to mind or when
someone else points out a better way to express it.
§ Experience is a key factor in understanding. The word “elephant” may not mean anything to
someone who does not understand English. But if it is shown to him what an elephant looks
like, then he can associate the word “elephant” with the big animal.
§ In the same way, it is important to UNDERSTAND what anicca means, by using one’s
experience: for example, we cannot maintain even our body the way we would like for the
LONG TERM, etc. Then you look at others, especially those who are even older than us, or
those who died of old age, and realize that it is true. Then you think about anything in this
world, and realize that it is true, i.e., we cannot maintain ANYTHING in this world to our
satisfaction, and that is anicca.
§ Also see, “Saññā – What It Really Means“.
8. The following is a table with some key Pāli words and links to a few posts that describe what those
words mean. More posts probably can be found by using the “Search” button on the top right.
Next, “Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in Buddhism“, ..
Word Links
Anicca, Dukkha, Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta
Anatta
Gathi, Bhava, jāti Gati, Bhava, and Jāti
Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi), The Law of Attraction, Habits,
Āsava Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas), Sansāric Habits, Character
(Gathi), and Cravings (Āsava)
Nibbāna Nibbāna
Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?, How to Taste
Nirāmisa sukha Nibbāna Nirāmisa Sukha (Happiness Arising from Dissociating from the
,
31 realms)
Paṭicca Samuppāda Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda, Paṭicca Samuppāda –
Introduction
San San
Saṅkhāra Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka
1. Morality and immorality are both built-in to nature. A human can choose to become moral or
immoral. This is because a human has a mind that can grasp right from wrong; on the other hand, an
animal does not have a developed mind that can sort out good deeds from the bad most of the time.
2. In Buddha Dhamma, which describes nature’s laws, the foundation of the moral code is the set of
ten moral actions (dasa kusala), which are to avoid the ten immoral actions (dasa akusala); see, “Ten
Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)” and the follow-up post.
3. If one does not follow this fundamental moral code, one becomes indebted to other humans and
also to the nature (which means all living beings, from which we “see” only a small fraction) in
general. In this life as well as in previous lives, we have become indebted to other beings.
§ Thus getting out of that debt, as well not to get into new debts, is also a part of the moral code
in Buddha Dhamma; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation” for more details.
§ This is in the “vinaya pitaka” of the Tipiṭaka; it is also described in the suttas in the sutta
pitaka. The third section of the Tipiṭaka, Abhidhamma, describes the ten moral/immoral actions
in depth.
4. Now let us see how most of our conventional moral code(s), comes from these two foundational
aspects of Buddha Dhamma.
§ Of the ten immoral actions three are done with body: killing, stealing, and sexual misconduct.
The basic difference with “conventional code” is that killing of animals is not considered
immoral in many societies.
§ There are four immoral actions done with speech: lying, slandering, harsh speech, and frivolous
talk, of which the latter is not taken seriously as immoral in most cases; but one can experience
the benefits of avoiding it for oneself.
§ Those seven immoral actions and speech ARISE due to the three kinds of immoral thoughts:
greed for other’s belongings, ill will or hatred, and established wrong views (lobha, dosa,
moha). In a way the last one is the root cause for all other nine, because one would not violate
any of them if one knew the true nature of the “wider world” (of 31 realms of existence and the
rebirth process therein): that it is unfruitful to engage in any of those nine immoral actions
(called “avijjā” or ignorance).
5. Then there is the other aspects of morality that comes from abstaining from getting into new debt
and paying off old debts (from the vinaya).
§ As one can easily see, giving (dana) in general is an excellent way of “paying off debt”. Since
we do not know who we have becomes indebted to in this long cycle of rebirths, giving can be
to anyone, including animals. For animals, the best giving is of course abstain from killing; not
to take their lives. Even though they cannot think like us, they do have feelings.
§ This point of “being debt free” incorporate many of our “conventional moral actions”: helping
out others, being considerate to others, etc.
§ A big part of this is also making sure to fulfil one’s responsibilities. All our associations have,
at the root, “long term debts” in play even though we do not realize it. The biggest debts are
those to our families and especially to children (and parents in return).
§ We constantly benefit from the actions of innumerable others living in this complex society; we
depend on each other for survival. Our food, energy needs, infrastructure needs, are hard to sort
out. The best way to pay off such debts is to do “one’s own part”, honestly doing one’s own job
and being a “good citizen”.
6. But the most important thing is to understand the true nature of this “wider world”. When one has
that understanding it will become automatic to follow the moral code. One does not have to make an
effort, because one’s mind clearly sees what is right and what is wrong. There are then such
meritorious actions (puñña kriya), which cultivate the “moral code behavior” and also purifies the
mind; see, “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā“.
§ The goal of this website is to clarify how people engage in immoral actions because their
inability to REALLY understand the true nature of this “wider world” (anicca, dukkha, anatta)
and thus to help get rid of such wrong views.
§ If one understood the “long term consequences” (and unfruitfulness) of acting with extreme
greed and hate, then one becomes automatically moral.
7. Finally, morality is not a one street. Unfortunately, the nature has both morality and immorality
built-in. Even though we think, “how one can do a highly immoral act like killing another human and
have a peace of mind?”, there are some who do ENJOY such acts. People like Hitler and Pol pot, as
well as serial killers, are good examples. They PLAN and carry out such vicious deeds with pleasure.
§ Thus the nature, at least on the surface (because the consequences are hidden and time-
delayed), is neutral on the matter of morality and immorality. One can go the moral route or the
immoral route. Humans have the ability to sort out which route is the correct one. However, it
is not easy for children to figure that out. This is why the guidance of the parents and teachers is
CRITICAL to point a child in the right direction.
Related Post: What Does Buddha Dhamma Say about Creator, Satan, Angels, and Demons?
Next, “What does Buddha Dhamma say About Birth Control?“, ………….
6.1.5.2 Is Eating Meat an Akusala Kamma (Immoral Deed)?
Published before October 23, 2015; revised October 19, 2016; February 16, 2018
Note added June 2, 2016: I decided to revise this post because I received comments from a few
people who thought it could encourage people to eat meat. My intention was not that, but merely to
point out that there are much worse things people ordinarily do even without thinking twice. It is best
to avoid eating meat out of compassion for animals.
1. The Buddha spent a lot of his time dispelling “bamunu matha” or “superficial concepts about
morality” adhered to by the vedic brahmins of that day.
§ It is unfortunate to see that many current “Buddhists” are practicing the same “bamunu matha“.
We have gone a full circle and are back to status that the Buddha tried very hard to change.
§ The reason is that we humans have the tendency to judge everything by how we perceive them
with our five physical senses, on outward appearances. There is more to nature than what we
see (ditta), hear (suta), taste (rasa) and smell (muta), and perceive (vinnata). The whole point
of the appearance of a Buddha in this world is to show us that the truth is much deeper, and we
need to “see” with paññā (wisdom). This will become clear as one learns Dhamma.
§ Thus the Buddha advised us to go beyond that and to “see the reality” by always paying
attention to his “pubbe ananussutesu dhammesu….”, or “”dhamma that has never been heard
before…”. Therefore, let us analyze this matter using his “cause and effect” doctrine, and not
the absolute, fatalistic doctrine of kamma; see, “What is Kamma? Is Everything Determined by
Kamma?“.
§ Thus, sometimes, the outward appearance of morality could be nothing but micchā diṭṭhi. Some
people try to attain Nibbāna by following rituals, and this is actually one micchā diṭṭhi one
needs to get rid of (silabbata paramasa) before attaining the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Misconception of categorizing “eating meat” as an akusala kamma is a micchā diṭṭhi too. Since
there is ample evidence in the Tipiṭaka that the Buddha himself accepted meat prepared under
certain conditions (see #9 below), are these people saying that the Buddha himself committed
an akusala kamma?
2. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Āmagandha Sutta (Sutta Nipata 2.2)” , the Buddha explained to a
brahmin why engaging in dasa akusala, and NOT eating “properly prepared” meat is a duccarita
(immoral deed). If one kills an animal to get the meat, then it is not “properly prepared”.
Pāli verse:
“Pāṇātipāto vadhachedabandhanaṃ,
Theyyaṃ musāvādo nikativañcanāni ca;
Ajjhenakuttaṃ paradārasevanā,
Esāmagandho na hi maṃsabhojanaṃ.
Here is one verse from the WebLink: suttacentral: English translation:
“Taking life, torture, mutilation too,
binding, stealing, telling lies, and fraud;
deceit, adultery, and studying crooked views:
this is carrion-stench, not the eating of meat”.
3. Devadatta, who tried to kill the Buddha and thereby to “become a Buddha”, first tried to split the
Buddha Sāsana by proposing “five strict conditions for the bhikkhus to obey”. His intent was to show
that he was “more moral” than the Buddha.
§ Devadatta demanded that the Buddha accede to the following five rules for the monks: they
should dwell all their lives in the forest, live entirely on alms obtained by begging, wear only
robes made of discarded rags, dwell at the foot of a tree, and abstain from eating meat.
§ The Buddha replied that Buddha Dhamma does not advocate a “path of rituals” (vatha). Instead
one attains Nibbāna by cleansing one’s mind and moral behavior follows automatically. This is
what is mean by, “sanvarattena silan“, or “when one sees the futility of ‘san‘ via
comprehension of anicca, dukkha, anatta, moral behavior or ‘sīla‘ is realized automatically”;
see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ On the other hand, there are people who are genuinely repulsed by the thoughts of animals
living under harsh conditions and being killed in animal farms and have voluntarily given up
meat eating, and that is good. In fact, as one gains paññā (wisdom), one’s craving for many
sensually pleasurable things, not just meat, automatically diminishes.
§ The craving for excess sense pleasures diminish automatically when one starts feeling the
nirāmisa sukha and realizes that that is much more calming and long lasting to the mind than
any sense pleasure that is brief; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“.
§ But the point is that paññā (wisdom) comes through understanding the true nature, and not
being persuaded via untruths.
4. In the Jivaka sutta, the Buddha states that bhikkhus can accept meat, ” when it is not seen or heard
or suspected that an animal has been purposely slaughtered for that offering“. I also found out
recently that the custom those days was to use “pavatta mānsa” for bhikkhus which means the meat
was from animals killed by other animals in the forest (lions and tigers normally eat only parts of an
animal and leave the rest which people then recover for food).
§ However, the Buddha prohibited bhikkhus from eating the flesh of human, elephant, horse, dog,
cat, lion, tiger, leopard, bear, hyenas. This was done for various reasons and the chief among
them is that they are not suitable for human consumption.
§ Just like some vegetations are toxic, some meats can have harmful effects. Other than that, meat
of a dead animal is no different from corn or wheat; they are all made out of satara mahā
bhūta: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo.
§ Once the mind leaves the physical body, the body becomes inert like a log. What is immoral is
to end the life of a living being willfully or to aid in such acts; once that deed is done, what is
left is no different than a log of wood.
§ However, this is not to say that the Buddha advocated eating meat. It is actually better for the
body to eat less meat and more vegetables and fruits. In general, we eat much more food than
necessary, and that leads to many health problems starting with obesity.
5. The key point is that EATING MEAT or ANYTHING ELSE if done with greed, then that is an
akusala kamma done with the mind: abhijjā [abhijjhā] or strong greed.
6. Then there are people who say, “if we all eat meat, that encourages other people to operate animal
farms and kill animals; therefore, we should not eat meat”. For those who are bothered by such
thoughts, it is better not to eat meat for the peace of mind. I actually have cut down a lot just out of
compassion. But we also need to examine the REASONS for some acts to be categorized as akusala
kamma.
§ Don’t farmers use pesticides to kill uncountable number of living beings when they cultivate
rice, wheat, vegetables, for our consumption? With the above logic, aren’t we encouraging
farmers to kill all those insects by eating basically any food that we buy at the supermarket?
§ These are the true “musavāda” (“musa” means “incorrect” and “vāda” means “debate”), i.e.,
trying to win an argument by using false premises. They appear to make sense on the surface,
but when you examine carefully, they have no substance.
§ We have to be really careful about having such “micchā diṭṭhi“, because niyata micchā diṭṭhi
can lead to rebirth in the apāyas. There are many such false beliefs that appear “harmless” but
count as micchā diṭṭhi (not knowing the true nature of things), and that is another reason why it
has been hard for people to attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ The bottom line is that it is better not to eat meat especially if that bothers one’s conscience.
But for those who don’t have that problem, there are probably other bad acts one needs to
worry about first; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma“.
7. There will always be people who engage in immoral acts and make a livelihood from that. We
cannot force others to be moral; we can only point out what is moral and what is immoral. It is up to
each person to decide, and understand that, “what one sows, one will reap”.
§ As I mentioned before, there was a “pig butcher” Chunda Sukara, who ran his butcher shop
right next to Veluwanaramaya, where the Buddha resided for many years. Even at the time of
the Buddha some questioned why the Buddha did not try to “save him”. If he did that, Chunda
Sukara would have generated hateful thoughts about the Buddha and would have ended up in
an even worse apāya, as explained by the Buddha. Thus one needs to think deeper than just go
by “outward appearances”.
§ On the other hand, we should point out the bad consequences of raising animals under
unfathomably harsh conditions in animal farms, and killing animals with unimaginably
cruel ways (see #10 below). Even though animals have much lower levels of “consciousness”,
they feel pain same as us. Still, we need to get rid of the “wrong saññā” that eating meat
(which is like any other food made of the satara mahā bhūta), is equivalent to eating “an
animal”. Once the animal is dead, the dead body is inert; the gandhabba has left that “inert
shell”; see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
§ In Sri Lanka, and probably in many Buddhist countries, there are many movements to “rescue
cows and other animals from the butcher”. They consider this act as an “abhaya dana“, which
they interpret as “giving back the life or saving the life of that animal”.
8. First, let us examine WHY a cow is born a cow in the first place. A cow is called a “harakā” in
Sinhala, which comes from “hara” meaning “the essence or what is good”, and “kā” meaning “eat or
destroy”. Thus one is born a cow due to a “cow sankhara“, i.e., one had done acts that led to
hardships for people. We know many people who do immoral acts that destroy other human lives or
at least lead to hardships for other people; those people are bound to be born cows, pigs, and other
animals and “pay back those debts”.
§ Even though we may save the life of a cow by paying off the butcher, that cow will go through
many such “cow lives” until the kammic energy of that “cow bhava” is spent and during that
time will be subjected to numerous killings. This may sound harsh, but that is the reality.
§ Instead of “trying to save existing cows”, which is a futile task as we saw above, what we
SHOULD do is to try to prevent even a single HUMAN from becoming a cow in future lives.
Once one gets a “cow bhava” one will be born in that bhava multiple times; see, “Bhava and
Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“. What we can do is to try get as many people as
possible to be EXPOSED to true Dhamma.
§ Thus even though we should not try to prevent people from rescuing such animals (saving a life
is always good), we need to educate people about the misconceptions on relative merits of
different deeds.
9. In that context, let us see what is really meant by “abhaya dana“. “Bhaya” means “fear” and
“abhaya” means preventing one from a dreadful outcome; of course “dāna” means “giving”. Thus
“abhaya dana” means giving the gift of removing one’s fright.
§ One should be dreadful about the suffering one could undergo in the four apāyas (four lowest
realms of existence), animal realm being one. If one can motivate a single human to
contemplate on that, that itself will be much more meritorious than “saving” millions cows; of
course, as we saw above a “saved cow” is not truly saved; it will pay its debts somehow or
other.
§ Yet, imagine the number of cow, pig, … lives that one could save if one can point another
human being toward becoming a Sotāpanna: that person will NEVER be born in any of the four
apāyas. That could be an uncountable number of lives saved by “saving a SINGLE human”.
That is the true “abhaya dana“, and that may not even cost any money.
10. The key point here is that a cow (or any other animal) cannot be “saved” by making it
comprehend Dhamma. And, there is no way to “shorten the time of existence” or in this case the
duration of the “cow bhava“. the It just has to wait until the kammic energy for that existence to run
out through however many “cow lives”.
§ But a human can comprehend Dhamma and could change the type of existence, and say for
example become a brahma. Furthermore, one could attain the Sotāpanna stage and be freed
from the apāyas, and may even attain the Arahanthood stage.
§ So, there is a HUGE difference in saving an animal life versus a human life.
§ Still I am not discouraging anyone from saving an animal. I am just saying that there are better
ways to utilize resources and try to help out humans. We never kill a bug or a fly that
occasionally gets in our house. We have a “bug catcher cup” that we use to catch it and throw
outside; trap the thing in the cup, slide a cardboard piece underneath slowly and carry to the
door.
11. I need to also point out that the Buddha himself ate meat when offered under the conditions given
in #3 above. In fact, the last meal of the Buddha was a “pork dish” which was especially made to
alleviate the pain that the Buddha had with ulcer-like ailment.
§ In this context, let us discuss another misconception about that “last meal”. After the meal, the
Buddha asked the remainder of the meal not be consumed by any human, and to be buried.
Some say this was because of a “contamination problem with that meal” which led to a
discomfort of the Buddha. If there was a problem with the dish, the Buddha would have seen it
beforehand.
§ The reason that the Buddha asked the remainder of the meal to thrown away was simply
because that meal was a special meal just like the first meal of milk rice offered to him at the
time of the attainment of the Buddhahood. Such meals can be digested only by a Buddha.
Devas and brahmas infuse highly potent nutrients into such meals; the Buddha was sustained
for 7 weeks with that single meal of milk rice.
12. Finally, the suffering of the animals is real, and this is one form of sansāric suffering that
the Buddha referred to. If you have nerves made out of steel, you can watch the gruesome acts that
occur in some animal farms, see the full movie “Earthlings” at the following site (Warning: These
scenes are highly disturbing to the mind, especially after about 10-15 minutes): “Nationearth.com“
§ We should not hesitate to point out the bad consequences of raising animals under
unfathomably harsh conditions in animal farms, and killing animals in unimaginably cruel
ways.
§ As I pointed out above, animals are bound to “reap what they already sowed in their past lives”.
Nature always finds a way to impart kamma vipāka. But the problem is that humans volunteer
to carry out those punishments, and in turn, generate much future suffering for themselves.
§ Thus the only tragic that CAN BE AVOIDED is the creation of similar outcomes (in future
births) for current humans who engage in such activities.
§ In any case, we cannot force morality on others. We can only point out the dangers and help
enact and enforce laws to forbid such unconscionable activities; such efforts have led to making
cockfighting illegal in the United States.
Next, “Do Things Just Happen? – The Hidden Causes“, ..
6.1.5.3 Do Things Just Happen? – The Hidden Causes
Just like in science, Buddha Dhamma is based on cause and effect. Nothing happens without a cause
(or more accurately multiple causes). But some of the causes are hidden and can be revealed only a
Buddha with the perfect mind. By learning his Dhamma, we can figure out many such important and
relevant causes that affect us.
1. There are many instances when we face a traumatic situation, and the first thing comes to our mind
is “Why is this happening to me? What have I done to deserve this?”.
§ And when we encounter good fortune (say landing a good job or winning a lottery), we are
overjoyed: “my luck has finally turned around”.
§ Both those conclusions are wrong. Nothing happens in this world without a cause (usually there
are multiple causes). Things DO NOT just happen. Nature does not work that way. In science,
we always look at the underlying causes to explain material phenomena.
§ A scientific theory is not even taken seriously unless it can provide evidence to support the
theory, i.e., to illustrate “cause and effect”. Buddha Dhamma is based on “cause and effect”.
2. The “cause and effect” of inert objects is easy to see and verify. Scientists can accurately land a
spaceship on the Moon because they can take into account all the causes and effects that would be
relevant to the flight of the spaceship. All scientific progress is made due to the “apparent” causes
and effects.
§ We can even predict/control the behavior of plants. By making suitable conditions for their
growth, farmers can reap good harvests. Even when things do not work out with farming, we
know the reasons (drought, too much rain, etc).
§ Thus we can verify the applicability of “cause and effect” when dealing with inert matter and
vegetation. The causes are not hidden.
§ This principle is also known as “action and reaction” in physics. Every action has an equal and
opposite reaction. Laws of kamma are more complex, but it is the same basic principle. You
cannot expect to do something and assume that it has no consequences.
3. Unlike material phenomena that involve dead and inert matter, each sentient living being has a
“history that goes back into the deep past” (a tree is living, but not sentient, i.e., it cannot think).
§ Therefore, for each sentient being, there could be causes that lie in the deep past. We just
cannot see them (if we develop abhiññā powers, we could see some).
§ This is why it is hard for many people to grasp the concept of kamma. When we look around us,
we may not see the “law of kamma” working. While a pious peasant may be living in a hut, a
drug lord seems to be enjoying life. Yet, in the long run, the laws of kamma work: that pious
peasant may be reborn to enjoy a good life, while the drug lord may suffer for a long time to
come in future births.
§ The present birth started due to past causes. It will proceed until that kammic power is
exhausted. What we should be mainly worried about is the next life.
§ All deeds have their consequences. As Nietzsche (1882) said, “..Lightening and thunder require
time, the light of the stars require time, deeds require time even after they are done, before they
can be seen and heard..”.
4. Then people ask: “But where is the evidence for that?”. The (indirect) evidence is all around us.
We just do not take time to analyze what we see. Our tendency is to take things at the face value,
without bothering to analyze a bit deeper; see, “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis“.
§ When we look around we see that some people are rich, some are poor; some die within a few
months, but there are others live to old age; some are healthy and vibrant, others are sick most
of the time, etc. All these happen now due to causes from past lives.
§ What are the causes for all those and much more varieties of life that we see all around us?
Many more are discussed in, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek Good Rebirths“.
5. Laws of kamma are nothing but “causes and effects”. Moral behavior leads to good results either
in this life OR in future lives. Immoral behavior leads to bad results, including bad rebirths.
§ However, kamma is nondeterministic, i.e., a cause does not inevitably lead to a result; see,
“What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“. By acting with mindfulness, one
can avoid many possible bad kamma vipāka, and also make conditions for good kamma vipāka
to come to fruition.
§ Actually, without a Buddha in the world, a normal human cannot figure out these things on
his/her own. But luckily, some evidence is coming from modern science due to the efforts of
thousands of scientists over the past few hundred years.
§ Many “wrong views” that people used to have in the old days have been corrected by science.
Actually, those helped confirm what the Buddha taught 2500 years ago; see, “Dhamma and
Science“.
6. Our ancestors could not explain many natural phenomena like earthquakes, volcano eruptions,
floods, etc and attributed those to “the fury of the Gods”. Even to date, whenever we don’t understand
something, our tendency is to attribute that to a supernatural being and “fill that gap”; this tendency is
called, “God of the gaps”.
§ But advances in science are slowly but surely closing those gaps, that exist with regard to the
workings of the MATERIAL WORLD. Those are due to natural causes.
7. However, there ARE gaps in our knowledge base that CANNOT be closed by the current approach
of science. These are to explain the workings of the human mind or consciousness.
§ Most theologians of today are correct in saying that mind cannot arise from matter; it does not
make sense to say that a human with feelings and perceptions can just “arise” out of inert
matter.
§ However, there is no need to “fill that gap” with God either. The Buddha described in detail the
workings of the human mind, which is separate from the working of the material world; see, “Is
Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) a Religion?“.
§ The “cause and effect” for the mind to arise is described by paṭicca samuppāda, but before that
can start making sense, one needs to understand the basics of Buddha Dhamma discussed in the
“Key Dhamma Concepts” section on the top menu.
8. Another effect that cannot be explained by current science is the “sense of fulfilment” one gets by
giving to the poor. If one takes a totally materialistic view, it is not possible to see ANY benefits in
giving.
§ There was a wealthy brahmin at the time of the Buddha, who was very much against giving. He
explained to others why giving can only lead to a loss by actually doing a demonstration: He
took a sack of rice and started giving portions to those who gathered. At the end the sack was
empty and he said, “look, this is what happens when you give. You lose what you have”.
§ The Buddha explained that the brahmin was unable to see the benefits in giving even in this life
(sense of joy), because of his wrong views, and thus there was no way he could see the benefits
in future lives. The brahmin died and was born a dog at the same house. It is a long story and I
may get to it in a future post.
§ The key point here is that there are many things that cannot be explained by just what we see
with our eyes. Cause and effect is not readily apparent when it involves the mind. Furthermore,
benefits of giving are not proportional to the value of the things given, but the state of the mind
of the giver.
9. But more than anything else, the truth of what the Buddha taught can be experienced. When one
follows the path recommended by the Buddha one can feel and experience the results in this life
itself.
§ Just by reading and understanding Dhamma concepts one’s mind can become calm and
peaceful; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“. I encourage everyone to
peruse through different sections at the site and read first whatever seem to make sense or
relevant to what one is looking for.
§ For example, one of the key issues that led people to believe in a supernatural being was how
morality can be there without such a being. But the Buddha taught that morality and immorality
are both built into nature; see, “Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in Buddhism“.
§ It could be surprising to many. But Buddha Dhamma can explain ANY phenomenon, whether
material or mind-based. Everything happens due to causes, even though some may be hidden
from a normal human’s sense faculties. By purifying one’s mind, one can have a better
understanding of how the nature operates; see, “The Importance of Purifying the Mind“.
§ October 18, 2016: A new post explains this in more detail: “Micca Diṭṭhi – Connection to
Hethu Phala (Cause and Effect)“.
Our character (gathi), behavior, and cravings (āsava) sometimes have causes from past lives. It is
easier to break bad habits when one understands causes and consequences.
§ In the “Moral Living” section, we discussed how to get rid of bad habits, incorporate good
habits, and thus achieve goals; see, “Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi)”. We saw that one’s
behavioral patterns or habits can form one’s character (gathi). Here we will see that some of
these habits are not formed in this life, but may have origins in previous lives. In a way, these
are only “discernible things” we carry from life-to-life; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of
a Lifestream”.
1. Habits (“gathi” in Pāli and Sinhala) are acquired by the repeated use. Habits can be neutral (one
can make a habit of start brushing teeth on the top left), good (exercising at a scheduled time), bad
(smoking).
§ The more one can stick to a set habit, that habit becomes more ingrained in the mind. Riding a
bike or learning to drive is a habit to learn. Initially it is hard, but once the habit is formed it is
done almost automatically; it becomes an ingrained “gathi“.
2. Bad habits can be stopped by making a conscious effort to disrupt the habit. Initially this takes a lot
of effort, and that is why assessing the consequences and convincing the mind of the dangers of a bad
habit is important at the very beginning.
§ Replacing a bad habit with a good (at least less harmful) habit is also important. Instead of
smoking, one could chew on a chewing gum when one gets the urge.
3. Habits also help mold the character (gathi) of a person. We see very different qualities of character
among people: kind and malicious, calm and agitated, thoughtful and easily-excitable, etc. It is easy
to see that people with “bad character qualities” are those with one or more prominent bad habits.
§ But the good news is that no one is “inherently bad”. There are causes (reasons) for a person to
have bad habits/character, and once those causes are removed one becomes a person with good
habits/character.
§ The best example is Angulimala, who lived during the time of the Buddha and killed close to
thousand people. The Buddha was able to show him the consequences of his behavior and he
was able to attain the Arahantship within a few weeks!
5. It is not only humans that display such personal characteristics; animals have them too. Some dogs
are vicious while others are adorable; some are more loyal than others, etc.
§ These are habits/character (gathi) that have been molded over multiple lives; but most character
(gathi) CHANGES happen only during a human life, because human mind is the most capable
of CHANGING habits. Animals, for example, are more like robots (not completely).
6. Bad habits are formed via bad judgements arising from a defiled mind that is covered by the five
hindrances. And bad habits lead to actions that further strengthen those same habits.
§ Once a certain bad “gathi” becomes established it can even lead to a birth with that “gathi“, i.e,
will be destined for “dugathi” (du + gathi) which is another name for the apāyas (the four
lowest realms). for example, someone who behaves and acts like an animal could well be
reborn an animal.
§ The cycle needs to be broken to stop this self-feeding process. But as long as the hindrances are
there, it is likely that sooner or later new bad habits will be formed.
7. Those beings that are in the apāyas can be put in to four major categories according to the
proportions of greed and hate that are in their sansāric “gathi” (of course ignorance is in all of them) :
§ Pretas [Sanskrit], petas [Pāli], i.e., hungry ghosts, have “greedy” gathi.
§ Those in the lowest realm, niraya (hell), have gathi dominated by hate.
§ Animals have “gathi” with both greed and hate. Therefore, the Pāli (or Sinhala) word for
animals is “thirisan” (=”thiri”+”san” or three defilements). Remember that ignorance is there
always.
§ Those in the asura (“a”+”süra”, where “a” means “not” and “süra” means proficient or capable;
thus asura means those who depend on others, and are lazy) realm have the habit of doing as
least as possible and exploit others’ hard work.
8. Similarly, one who cultivates good habits is destined for a “good” rebirth (sugathi = su + gathi),
i.e., human realm or above. For example, one who does not indulge in sense pleasures and cultivates
compassion and loving kindness could be reborn in the Brahma realms where there is relatively less
suffering, and mostly jhānic pleasures.
§ Devas (realms 6-11) are full of compassion and do not have hateful thoughts. But they like to
enjoy sense pleasures.
§ Brahmas (realms 12-31) do not have either greed or hate.
§ Humans (realms 5) COULD have all three. However, the unique aspect of the human realm is
the ability to purify one’s own mind and REMOVE all three, and become an Arahant (attain
Nibbāna). This is done by following the Noble Eightfold Path and removing all “bad habits”
one has.
Of course, Devas and Brahmas both have ignorance, and thus could be reborn in any realm when
they die (unless they had attained the Sotāpanna stage).
9. Once ingrained in the mind, habits can be carried over repeated rebirths, from life to life. One who
is easily tempted by alcohol is likely to have had that habit in the previous lives.
§ One who forms that habit in this life (even if he did not have it before), is likely to carry it over
to the next life. Similarly, one who cultivates generosity in this life is likely to have that habit in
the next life as well.
10. If those bad habits keep building up life after life, they get fermented and solidified and thus will
become deeply embedded in one’s psyche. We all carry deeply ingrained sansāric habits associated
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
676 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
with one or more of defilements. These are called mental fermentations or deeply embedded
cravings (“āsava” in Pāli or Sinhala).
§ Some gathi and āsava lay hidden (sleeping), and are called “anusaya“. With a strong
enough “trigger” an ingrained anusaya can be brought to the surface. Anusaya are the hardest to
get rid of.
§ When one continually acts in ways to strengthen one’s gathi (character), that makes the
corresponding āsava and anusaya even stronger.
11. Thus it is clear why breaking bad habits is critically important, not only for the benefit of this life,
but also for future lives.
Next, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek “Good Rebirths”“, ……….
If you would like to read about how these āsavas can be removed, see, “The Way to Nibbāna –
Removal of Āsavas“.
6.2.2 Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek “Good Rebirths”
1. Everything that we see around us can be roughly put into three categories: lifeless matter, plant
life, and sentient beings (i.e., life with consciousness). Scientists have been mostly successful in
explaining the behavior of inter matter, at least in the macroscopic scale.
§ For example, a rocket can be launched with high precision to land on a given spot on the Moon.
Complexity increases somewhat when going to biological matter without consciousness
(plants).
2. However, the behavior of a sentient being is almost impossible to predict with any kind of
precision. This is because the working of a mind with 89 types of cittas (thoughts) and 52 types of
cetasikas (mental properties) is very complex; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma” and the
posts in the “Abhidhamma” section.
§ However, the Buddha has taught us how to understand why different types of living beings are
born that way, and why people are born with wide-ranging levels of health, wealth, beauty, etc.
3. When we look around, we see that animals, in general, encounter more suffering than humans.
Even among people, the range of suffering is enormous, and some people even seem to be enjoying
life without any apparent signs of suffering.
§ Also, some are born rich, healthy, beautiful, etc. others are born to poverty, handicapped, ugly,
etc.
§ The character of people also lies in a very broad spectrum, as we discussed above.
§ Furthermore, the “fortunes” of a given person could change drastically in a relatively short
time. One could go from being penniless to a riches or other way around quickly.
§ When we look at animals too, some pets get treated even better than some humans, while others
live under horrible conditions. They also have a wide range of personal characteristics.
4. Such apparent vagaries of life have perfectly good explanations in Buddha Dhamma. However,
there are no simple one-to-one correspondences compared to the comparatively simpler rules that are
available for tracking the behavior of macroscopic inert objects.
5. The behavior of (macroscopic) inert matter can be explained in terms of simpler cause and effect.
If one knows the current conditions, one can predict the future outcome using scientifically-found
natural laws (law of gravitation or laws of relativity).
§ However, even this is beginning to change with the advent of quantum mechanics; we are now
beginning to probe the realm where matter merges with the mind. We will discuss such instance
in the future.
6. Similarly, the behavior of life can be explained in terms of kamma vipāka (results of one’s actions)
together with habits (“gathi”) and āsavas; see, “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“. However, unlike cause
and effect regarding inter matter, the behavior of life is much more complex, because the MIND IS
COMPLEX, see “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma”.
§ There are many causes (innumerable kamma vipāka and numerous types of habits and āsavas)
leading to many effects, versus just one or few causes leading one effect or a few effects.
§ This is discussed in many suttas, but a good start is the “WebLink: suttacentral: Cula Kamma
Vibhanga Sutta (MN 135)“. That site gives translations in several languages, but as with almost
all internet sites, translations of some key Pāli words may not be accurate.
7. In general, good habits and good kamma vipāka lead rebirth in realms at or above the human
realm. We need to make sure not to commit any akusala (unwholesome) kamma that could lead to
rebirth in the four lower realms, and to engage in meritorious actions.
§ Another is to realize that āsavas (mental fermentations or deeply embedded cravings) could
lead to spontaneous actions (in a rage or a sudden mental weakness). Maintaining good habits,
removing bad habits, and acting with generosity, kindness, and wisdom help cleanup the deeply
embedded āsavas, thus preventing such actions on sudden impulses as well as being able to be
mindful.
8. Any type of meditation (samatha, metta, and vipassana) will also be quite helpful. Just
contemplating on good thoughts and suppressing bad thoughts as they arise throughout the day is also
meditation (this was the original definition of bhāvanā).
Next, “How to Avoid Births in the Apayas“, ………..
6.2.3 How to Avoid Birth in the Apāyas
1. There are five heinous kamma (acts) that GUARANTEE a rebirth in the lowest four realms in the
very next birth. These are called the panca anantariya kamma or five acts that will bring a bad birth
without “a gap” (unlike many kamma vipāka can come to fruition in later lives, i.e., their results are
seen only later in saṃsāra). These five are:
§ Killing one’s mother
§ Killing one’s father
§ Killing an Arahant
§ Causing an injury to a Buddha
§ Causing schism in the Saṅgha (the monastic order)
2. The next level is “niyatha micchā diṭṭhi” or “an established wrong world view” (which means one
is not even willing to consider the possibility that one could be wrong in holding onto such views)
that will cause one to be born in the apāyas at some point in saṃsāra. This means that one with these
false views could be reborn in the apāyas in the next life or any future life. There are eight such
views:
§ No such thing as, (1) mother, (2) father, (3) Buddha, (4) rebirth, (5) kamma vipāka, (6)
opapātika birth (instant full-formed birth), (7) apāyas, and (8) rūpa loka/arūpa loka. For
explanations on (6)-(8), see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
It must be noted that Even a Sotāpanna may not be fully convinced of the truth of some of the
above. But a Sotāpanna has not ruled out any of the above and is not adamant on holding onto a
wrong view.
3. Thus the possibility of a birth in the apāyas in any future birth is there until all established
(unshakable) wrong views (niyata micchā diṭṭhi) are rejected by one’s mind. We all have committed
both good and bad kamma in the past lives that we are not aware of; thus any of those could cause a
birth anywhere in the 31 realms.
4. It is important to remember that those false views cannot be just memorized and pretended to be
discarded. The mind needs to be convinced that those are indeed false views. This is why it is
important to examine the world view of the Buddha. These are the key concepts discussed in the top
menus, especially, “What is Buddha Dhamma?” and “Key Dhamma Concepts“.
5. The only guaranteed way to stay out of the apāyas (the four lowest realms) in ANY future life is to
become a Sotāpanna.
What Happens at the Sotāpanna Stage?
1. As I keep repeating, the Buddha is just the messenger; he discovered the true nature of this world.
First of all, this world is much more complex than we perceive. In order to understand how to remove
suffering, one has to understand the causes, and that requires the complete picture of “this
world” (see, “What is Buddha Dhamma?” and in particular, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“) and also why it is not possible to remove suffering without understanding the Three
Characteristics of “this world” (see, “Key Dhamma Concepts” and in particular, “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta - Wrong Interpretations“).
2. When one “sees” the true nature of “this world”, the mind will automatically give up those false
views mentioned in the above section (#2). This is why it is first important to learn Dhamma first.
No one, regardless of one’s high intellect, can discover the complete set of nature’s laws other than a
Buddha.
3. From the discussion so far, it is clear what needs to be done to reach the Sotāpanna stage. All that
is needed is to carefully examine the world view of the Buddha as mentioned in #1 in this section.
One needs to understand the “vision”, and to become “dassanena sampanno” or “one with clear
vision”. This is why “dassanena pahatabba” or “removal by vision” is listed as #1 item in the seven
items required to attain Nibbāna in the Sabbasava Sutta; see, “Key Points in the Sabbasava Sutta” in
“The Sotāpanna Stage“.
4. Thus essentially all that happens at reaching the Sotāpanna stage is to get a clear world view. Now
one has understood the true nature of this world, and thus “knows” that it is not possible to achieve
lasting happiness anywhere in the 31 realms. One may not have removed any āsavas other than the
diṭṭhi āsava. Thus one still may have kamasava, bhavasava, and avijjasava, i.e., one still may have
greed, hatred, and ignorance even though parts of all three have been permanently been removed by
the clear vision. How the āsavas are formed starting with habits is discussed in the “Habits and
Goals“, “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“, and “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas” sections in
that order.
5. Therefore, even though one may have greed, hate, and ignorance left, one knows what they are.
And one knows how to remove them. After attaining the Sotāpanna stage one does not need a
teacher. One knows what needs to be done. As one gets rid of the remaining āsavas, the vision
becomes even more clear and full and complete Sammā Diṭṭhi is attained at the Arahanthood.
Next, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“, …….
6.2.4 How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human
Realm
Many people believe that if we live a “good, moral life,” a rebirth in the human or even higher deva
worlds is guaranteed. That is a misconception. Even if we do not accumulate a single new bad kamma
in this life, we may have accumulated many bad kamma in past lives. That is why it is difficult get
a human existence (bhava).
§ Evidence for rebirth is at, “Evidence for Rebirth.” Rebirth can occur not only in as a human but
in any of the 31 realms. Most suffering in the cycle of rebirth occurs in the lowest four realms:
niraya (hell), asura, animal, and peta realms. Of those four, only the animal realm is visible to
us. They are collectively called the apāyās.
§ Getting a “human existence (bhava)” is rare. But once one grasps a human bhava, one could be
born (jāti) many times as a human until the kammic energy for that human bhava is exhausted.
That is why children can recall past lives. In between consecutive human births, that life-stream
exists in the nether world or “para loka” as a gandhabba with a subtle body; see, “Hidden
World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)”
§ The 31 realms of existence described in “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.”
1. Nakhasikha Sutta
Translation:
At Sāvatthī. Then the Buddha, picking up a little bit of sand on his fingernail, addressed the bhikkhus:
“What do you think, bhikkhus? Which is more: the little bit of sand on my fingernail, or this great
Earth?”
“Bhante, the great earth is far more. The little bit of sand on your fingernail is tiny. Compared to the
great Earth, those cannot be compared or even imagined; it is not even a significant fraction.”
“In the same way, bhikkhus, sentient beings reborn as humans are few as this bit of sand on my
fingernail. But those not reborn as humans are many as sand on this great Earth. Therefore, you
should strive diligently and without delay to end this suffering in the rebirth process”.
Let us make two points clear regarding the above simile of the Buddha:
1. When a being gets a human life, that “human bhava” has a specific kammic energy associated with
it, say 1000 years worth. In that case, the person may be born a few times with a human body (this is
the difference between “bhava” and “jāti”). The cuti-paṭisandhi transition to a new “bhava” happens
at the end of 1000 years; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein,” and “Cuti-
Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description.”
§ What the Buddha refers to above is concerned with that new paṭisandhi at the end of the
“human bhava.”
§ It is extremely rare to attain a human bhava, but once in a human bhava, one can be born tens
or even hundreds of times as a human. In the animal realm, a given animal may be reborn
thousands or even millions of times to exhaust that kammic energy.
2. Even though the above simile may seem to be out-of-proportion with the realities, it is not. That is
why I say that modern science has given a boost to Buddha Dhamma by making many things clear.
Ordinary humans were not aware of the existence of innumerable microscopic living beings until the
invention of the microscope in the 1500s. In 1676, Van Leeuwenhoek reported the discovery of
micro-organisms. He observed numerous tiny living beings in a glass of water; see, WebLink: WIKI:
Microscope
Here is a short video showing countless such microscopic creatures:
WebLink: Live in a water drop @TSRlab
§ If you go out and dig a bit of dirt, there could be millions of living organisms there. In a
household there may be a few humans, but possibly billions or even trillions of living beings.
The oceans cover two-thirds of the Earth’s surface, and the living creatures there are much
more densely-packed. And there are beings in other 29 realms that we cannot see. Seven billion
or so humans in this world are indeed a thumb-full compared to countless living creatures that
live associated with the Earth. Thus, as in many cases, modern science has helped verify
Buddha’s words.
§ Some of these realms could be in other dimensions; see, “Consciousness Dependence on
Number of Dimensions“. In the string theory, scientists say there could be ten dimensions
instead of the three that we experience.
§ However, one can actually “see” beings in other dimensions as well as microscopic beings in a
glass of water if one develops abhiññā powers; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Introduction”
and the follow-up posts. One time, a bhikkhu who had developed abhiññā skills but had not
becomes an Arahant, saw the presence of a large number of microscopic beings in a glass of
water. He tried to filter them out but was unsuccessful, and became distraught. The Buddha told
him that “it is not possible to live in this world without harming other beings. It is necessary to
live this life to attain Nibbāna,” and to drink the water. The INTENTION there is to quench the
thirst; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma.”
§ Modern science has found out that there are millions of living beings on a single human body
(as well as on any other large animal). They have used sophisticated instruments to see
microscopic creatures. See, “There are as Many Creatures on your Body as there are People on
Earth!.”
Thus modern science has indeed shown that the human population is negligible compared to just the
animal populations (including microscopic beings). And we can experience only two realms (animal
and human) compared to the 31 realms that the Buddha described.
2. WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiyachiggaḷayuga Sutta (SN 56.48)
Translation:
“Bhikkhus, suppose that this great Earth had become one mass of water, and a man would throw a
yoke with a single hole upon it. An easterly stream would move it eastward. A westerly stream would
move it westward; a northerly stream would move it northward. A southerly stream would move it
southward.
There was a blind turtle that would come to the surface once every hundred years. What do you think,
bhikkhus, would that blind turtle, coming to the surface once every hundred years, insert its neck into
that yoke with a single hole?”
“It would be an extremely rare occurrence, Bhante, that the blind turtle, coming to the surface once
every hundred years, would insert its neck into that yoke with a single hole.”
“So too, bhikkhus, how extremely rare that one is born a human.
You have this rare chance now, bhikkhus, to be not only born a human but be born while a Tathāgata
has arisen in the world. While the Dhamma and Discipline proclaimed by the Tathāgata shines in the
world.
Therefore, bhikkhus, you should strive without delay to understand the following. ‘This is suffering
(dukkha). This is the cause of suffering (dukkha samudaya). This is how that cause is removed
(dukkha nirodhaya). And this is the way leading to the cessation of suffering (dukkha nirodha gāmini
patipadā).’”
§ Many scientists are now discussing these “hard to fathom” ideas about infinity. Of course, they
are unaware of Buddha’s teachings. See, for example, “The Beginning of Infinity” by David
Deutsch (2011).
§ Most human beings head to the apāyās because they are not even aware of the ten immoral
actions; see, “Ten Immoral Actions – Dasa Akusala,” and “How to Evaluate Weights of
Different Kamma.” It is also essential to know the baseline procedure to avoid such immoral
actions and to cultivate moral behavior; see, “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā.”
However, when a living being acquires a human bhava or human existence, that can last a long time
(many hundreds to many thousands of years). Within that human bhava, there will be multiple human
births; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein.”
3. WebLink: suttacentral: Assu Sutta (SN 15.3)
Translation:
First, the Buddha made the famous statement: “Anamataggoyam bhikkhave, samsaro pubbā koti na
pannāyati avijjā nivārananam sattānam taṇhā-samyojananam sandhāvatam samsāratam.”
§ Translated: “Bhikkhus, this rebirth process has no discernible (na pannāyati) beginning.
Beings whose minds are covered by ignorance and are bound to this rebirth process with
bonds of craving.”
Saṃyutta Nikāya 22
10. Pupphavagga
97. Nakhasikhāsutta
Sāvatthinidānaṃ. Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho so bhikkhu bhagavantaṃ etadavoca: “atthi nu kho, bhante,
kiñci rūpaṃ yaṃ rūpaṃ niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ sassatisamaṃ tatheva
ṭhassati? Atthi nu kho, bhante, kāci vedanā yā vedanā niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā
sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassati? Atthi nu kho, bhante, kāci saññā … pe … keci saṅkhārā, ye saṅkhārā
niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassanti? Atthi nu kho, bhante, kiñci
viññāṇaṃ, yaṃ viññāṇaṃ niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ sassatisamaṃ tatheva
ṭhassatī”ti? “Natthi kho, bhikkhu, kiñci rūpaṃ, yaṃ rūpaṃ niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ
avipariṇāmadhammaṃ sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassati. Natthi kho, bhikkhu, kāci vedanā … kāci saññā
… keci saṅkhārā … pe … kiñci viññāṇaṃ, yaṃ viññāṇaṃ niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ
avipariṇāmadhammaṃ sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassatī”ti.
Atha kho bhagavā parittaṃ nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsuṃ āropetvā taṃ bhikkhuṃ etadavoca: “ettakampi
kho, bhikkhu, rūpaṃ natthi niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ sassatisamaṃ tatheva
ṭhassati. Ettakañcepi, bhikkhu, rūpaṃ abhavissa niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ,
nayidaṃ brahmacariyavāso paññāyetha sammā dukkhakkhayāya. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhu, ettakampi
rūpaṃ natthi niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ, tasmā brahmacariyavāso paññāyati
sammā dukkhakkhayāya”.
Ettakāpi kho, bhikkhu, vedanā natthi niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā sassatisamaṃ tatheva
ṭhassati. Ettakā cepi, bhikkhu, vedanā abhavissa niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā, na yidaṃ
brahmacariyavāso paññāyetha sammā dukkhakkhayāya. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhu, ettakāpi vedanā
natthi niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā, tasmā brahmacariyavāso paññāyati sammā
dukkhakkhayāya.
Ettakāpi kho, bhikkhu, saññā natthi … pe … ettakāpi kho, bhikkhu, saṅkhārā natthi niccā dhuvā
sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassanti. Ettakā cepi, bhikkhu, saṅkhārā
abhavissaṃsu niccā dhuvā sassatā avipariṇāmadhammā, na yidaṃ brahmacariyavāso paññāyetha
sammā dukkhakkhayāya. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhu, ettakāpi saṅkhārā natthi niccā dhuvā sassatā
avipariṇāmadhammā, tasmā brahmacariyavāso paññāyati sammā dukkhakkhayāya.
Ettakampi kho, bhikkhu, viññāṇaṃ natthi niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ
sassatisamaṃ tatheva ṭhassati. Ettakampi kho, bhikkhu, viññāṇaṃ abhavissa niccaṃ dhuvaṃ
sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ, na yidaṃ brahmacariyavāso paññāyetha sammā dukkhakkhayāya.
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhu, ettakampi viññāṇaṃ natthi niccaṃ dhuvaṃ sassataṃ avipariṇāmadhammaṃ,
tasmā brahmacariyavāso paññāyati sammā dukkhakkhayāya.
Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, bhikkhu, rūpaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti? “Aniccaṃ, bhante”. “Vedanā … saññā
… saṅkhārā … viññāṇaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti? “Aniccaṃ, bhante” … pe … “tasmātiha … pe …
evaṃ passaṃ … pe … nāparaṃ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
Pañcamaṃ.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 56
6. Abhisamayavagga
51. Nakhasikhāsutta
Atha kho bhagavā parittaṃ nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsuṃ āropetvā bhikkhū āmantesi: “taṃ kiṃ maññatha,
bhikkhave, katamaṃ nu kho bahutaraṃ—yo vāyaṃ mayā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito,
ayaṃ vā mahāpathavī”ti? “Etadeva, bhante, bahutaraṃ yadidaṃ—mahāpathavī; appamattakāyaṃ
bhagavatā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito. Saṅkhampi na upeti, upanidhampi na upeti,
kalabhāgampi na upeti mahāpathaviṃ upanidhāya bhagavatā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu
āropito”ti. “Evameva kho, bhikkhave, ariyasāvakassa diṭṭhisampannassa puggalassa abhisametāvino
etadeva bahutaraṃ dukkhaṃ yadidaṃ parikkhīṇaṃ pariyādinnaṃ; appamattakaṃ avasiṭṭhaṃ.
Saṅkhampi na upeti, upanidhampi na upeti, kalabhāgampi na upeti purimaṃ dukkhakkhandhaṃ
parikkhīṇaṃ pariyādinnaṃ upanidhāya yadidaṃ sattakkhattuparamatā; yo ‘idaṃ dukkhan’ti
yathābhūtaṃ pajānāti … pe … ‘ayaṃ dukkhanirodhagāminī paṭipadā’ti yathābhūtaṃ pajānāti.
Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, ‘idaṃ dukkhan’ti yogo karaṇīyo … pe … ‘ayaṃ dukkhanirodhagāminī
paṭipadā’ti yogo karaṇīyo”ti.
Paṭhamaṃ.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 13
1. Abhisamayavagga
1. Nakhasikhāsutta
Evaṃ me sutaṃ— ekaṃ samayaṃ bhagavā sāvatthiyaṃ viharati jetavane anāthapiṇḍikassa ārāme.
Atha kho bhagavā parittaṃ nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsuṃ āropetvā bhikkhū āmantesi: “taṃ kiṃ maññatha,
bhikkhave, katamaṃ nu kho bahutaraṃ, yo vāyaṃ
mayā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito, ayaṃ vā mahāpathavī”ti?
“Etadeva, bhante, bahutaraṃ, yadidaṃ mahāpathavī. Appamattako bhagavatā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ
paṃsu āropito. Neva satimaṃ kalaṃ upeti na sahassimaṃ kalaṃ upeti na satasahassimaṃ kalaṃ
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
684 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
upeti mahāpathaviṃ upanidhāya bhagavatā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito”ti. “Evameva kho,
bhikkhave, ariyasāvakassa diṭṭhisampannassa puggalassa abhisametāvino etadeva bahutaraṃ
dukkhaṃ yadidaṃ parikkhīṇaṃ pariyādiṇṇaṃ; appamattakaṃ avasiṭṭhaṃ. Neva satimaṃ kalaṃ upeti
na sahassimaṃ kalaṃ upeti na satasahassimaṃ kalaṃ upeti purimaṃ dukkhakkhandhaṃ parikkhīṇaṃ
pariyādiṇṇaṃ upanidhāya yadidaṃ sattakkhattuṃparamatā. Evaṃ mahatthiyo kho, bhikkhave,
dhammābhisamayo; evaṃ mahatthiyo dhammacakkhupaṭilābho”ti.
Paṭhamaṃ.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 20
1. Opammavagga
2. Nakhasikhasutta
Sāvatthiyaṃ viharati. Atha kho bhagavā parittaṃ nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsuṃ āropetvā bhikkhū
āmantesi: “taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, katamaṃ nu kho bahutaraṃ, yo cāyaṃ mayā paritto
nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito yā cāyaṃ mahāpathavī”ti? “Etadeva, bhante, bahutaraṃ yadidaṃ
mahāpathavī. Appamattakoyaṃ bhagavatā paritto nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito. Saṅkhampi na upeti
upanidhimpi na upeti kalabhāgampi na upeti mahāpathaviṃ upanidhāya bhagavatā paritto
nakhasikhāyaṃ paṃsu āropito”ti. “Evameva kho, bhikkhave, appakā te sattā ye manussesu
paccājāyanti; atha kho eteyeva bahutarā sattā ye aññatra manussehi paccājāyanti. Tasmātiha,
bhikkhave, evaṃ sikkhitabbaṃ: ‘appamattā viharissāmā’ti. Evañhi vo, bhikkhave, sikkhitabban”ti.
Dutiyaṃ.
6.2.4.2 Kanakacchapa-sutta
"At one time, the Buddha addressed the disciples thus: 'there is, O Bhikkhus, in the ocean a turtle,
both of whose eyes are blind. He plunges into the water of the unfathomable ocean and swims about
incessantly in any direction wherever his head may lead. There is also in the ocean the yoke of a cart,
which is ceaselessly floating about on the surface of the water, and is carried away in all directions by
tide, current and wind. Thus these two go on throughout an incalculable space of time: perchance it
happens that in the course of time the yoke arrives at the precise place and time where and when the
turtle puts up his head, and yokes on to it. Now, O Bhikkhus, is it possible that such a time might
come as is said?' 'In ordinary truth, O Lord,' replied the Bhikkhus 'it is impossible; but time being so
spacious, and an eon lasting so long, it may be admitted that perhaps at some time or other it might be
possible for the two to yoke together, as said; if the blind tortoise lives long enough, and the yoke
does not tend to rot and break up before such a coincidence comes to pass.'
Then the Buddha said, 'O Bhikkhus, the occurrence of such a strange thing is not to be counted a
difficult one; for there is still a greater, a harder, a hundred times, a thousand times more difficult
than this lying hidden from your knowledge. And what is this? It is, O Bhikkhus, the obtaining of the
opportunity of becoming a man again by a man who has expired and is reborn once in any of the four
realms of misery. The occurrence of the yoking of the blind tortoise is not worth thinking of as a
difficult occurrence in comparison therewith. Because those who perform good deeds and abstain
from doing bad alone can obtain the existence of men and Devas. The beings in the four miserable
worlds cannot discern what is virtuous and what vicious, what good and what bad, what moral and
what immoral, what meritorious and what de-meritorious, and consequently they live a life of
immorality and demerit, tormenting one another with all their power. Those creatures of the Niraya
and Peta abode in particular, live a very miserable life on account of punishments and torments,
which they experience with sorrow, pain and distress. Therefore, O Bhikkhus, the opportunity of
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 685
being reborn in the abode of men is a hundred times, a thousand times harder to obtain than the
encountering of the blind turtle with the yoke."
According to this Sutta, why those creatures who are born in the miserable planes are far from human
existence is because they never look up but always look down. And what is meant by looking down?
The ignorance in them by degrees becomes greater and stronger from one existence to another; and as
the water of a river always flows down to the lower plains, so also they are always tending towards
the lower existences; for the ways towards the higher existences are closed to them, while those
towards the lower existences are freely open. This is the meaning of "looking down". Hence, from
this story of the blind turtle, the wise apprehend how great, how fearful, how terribly perilous are the
evils of the -- Puthujjana-gati, i.e. "the dispersion of existence."
What has been said is concerning the Puthujjana-gati. Now what is Ariya-gati? It is deliverance from
the dispersion of existence after death. Or it is the disappearance of that "dispersion of existence"
which is conjoined with the destiny of inevitable death in every existence". It is also the potentiality
of being reborn in higher existences or in existences according to one's choice. It is also not like the
fall of coconuts from trees; but it is to be compared to birds, which fly through the air to whatsoever
place or tree on which they may wish to perch. Those men, Devas and Brahmas who have attained
the Aryan state, can get to whatever better existence, i.e., as men, Devas, Brahmas, they may wish to
be reborn into, when they expire from the particular existence in which they have attained such Aryan
state. Though they expire unexpectedly without aiming to be reborn in any particular existence, they
are destined to be reborn in a better or higher existence, and at the same time are entirely free from
rebirth into lower and miserable existences. Moreover, if they are reborn again in the abode of men,
they never become of the lower or poorer classes, nor are they fools or heretics, but become quite
otherwise. It is the same in the abodes of Devas and Brahmas. They are entirely set free from the
Puthujjana-gati.
What has been said is concerning the course of Ariyas. Now we will explain the two Gatis side by
side. When a man falls from a tree he falls like a coconut because he has no wings with which to fly
in the air. In precisely the same way when men, Devas and Brahmas who are Putthujjana, riveted to
the hallucination of wrong views and having no wings of the Noble Eightfold Path to make the sky
their resting-place, transmigrate after the dissolution of their present bodies into new ones, they fall
tumbling into the bonds of the evils of dispersion. In this world ordinary men who climb up very high
trees fall tumbling to the ground when the branches which they clutch or try to make their resting
place break down. They suffer much pain from the fall, and sometimes death ensues because they
have no other resting-places but the branches, neither have they wings to fly in the air. It is the same
with men, Devas and Brahmas who have their hallucination of Wrong Views, when their resting-
place of Wrong Views as regards self is broken down, they fall tumbling into the dispersion
existence. For their resting- places are only their bodies; and they have neither such a resting place as
Nibbána, nor such strong wings as the Noble Eightfold Path to support them. As for the birds, though
the branches they rest on may break, they never fall, but easily fly through the air to any other tree.
For the branches are not their permanent resting places but only temporary ones. They entirely rely
on their wings and the air. In the same way, men, Devas and Brahmas who have become Ariya and
are freed from the hallucination of Wrong Views, neither regard their bodies as their Attá or Self, nor
rely upon them. They have in their possession permanent resting places, such as Nibbána, which is
the entire cessation of all tumbling existence. They also possess the very mighty wings of the Noble
Eightfold Path, which are able to bear them to better existences.
What has been said is concerning the distinction between the two Gatis, i.e., the Putthujjana-gati and
the Ariya-gati.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 56
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
686 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
5. Papātavagga
47. Paṭhamachiggaḷayugasutta
“Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, puriso mahāsamudde ekacchiggaḷaṃ
yugaṃ pakkhipeyya. Tatrāpissa kāṇo kacchapo. So vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ
ummujjeyya. Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, api nu kho kāṇo kacchapo vassasatassa vassasatassa
accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ ummujjanto amusmiṃ ekacchiggaḷe yuge gīvaṃ paveseyyā”ti? “Yadi nūna,
bhante, kadāci karahaci dīghassa addhuno accayenā”ti.
“Khippataraṃ kho so, bhikkhave, kāṇo kacchapo vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ
ummujjanto amusmiṃ ekacchiggaḷe yuge gīvaṃ paveseyya, na tvevāhaṃ, bhikkhave, sakiṃ
vinipātagatena bālena manussattaṃ vadāmi.
Taṃ kissa hetu? Na hettha, bhikkhave, atthi dhammacariyā, samacariyā, kusalakiriyā, puññakiriyā.
Aññamaññakhādikā ettha, bhikkhave, vattati dubbalakhādikā. Taṃ kissa hetu? Adiṭṭhattā, bhikkhave,
catunnaṃ ariyasaccānaṃ. Katamesaṃ catunnaṃ? Dukkhassa ariyasaccassa … pe …
dukkhanirodhagāminiyā paṭipadāya ariyasaccassa.
Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, ‘idaṃ dukkhan’ti yogo karaṇīyo … pe … ‘ayaṃ dukkhanirodhagāminī
paṭipadā’ti yogo karaṇīyo”ti.
Sattamaṃ.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 56
5. Papātavagga
48. Dutiyachiggaḷayugasutta
“Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, ayaṃ mahāpathavī ekodakā assa. Tatra puriso ekacchiggaḷaṃ yugaṃ
pakkhipeyya. Tamenaṃ puratthimo vāto pacchimena saṃhareyya, pacchimo vāto puratthimena
saṃhareyya, uttaro vāto dakkhiṇena saṃhareyya, dakkhiṇo vāto uttarena saṃhareyya. Tatrassa kāṇo
kacchapo. So vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ ummujjeyya. Taṃ kiṃ maññatha,
bhikkhave, api nu kho kāṇo kacchapo vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ ummujjanto
amusmiṃ ekacchiggaḷe yuge gīvaṃ paveseyyā”ti? “Adhiccamidaṃ, bhante, yaṃ so kāṇo kacchapo
vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṃ sakiṃ ummujjanto amusmiṃ ekacchiggaḷe yuge gīvaṃ
paveseyyā”ti.
“Evaṃ adhiccamidaṃ, bhikkhave, yaṃ manussattaṃ labhati. Evaṃ adhiccamidaṃ, bhikkhave, yaṃ
tathāgato loke uppajjati arahaṃ sammāsambuddho. Evaṃ adhiccamidaṃ, bhikkhave, yaṃ
tathāgatappavedito dhammavinayo loke dibbati. Tassidaṃ, bhikkhave, manussattaṃ laddhaṃ,
tathāgato loke uppanno arahaṃ sammāsambuddho, tathāgatappavedito ca dhammavinayo loke
dibbati.
Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, ‘idaṃ dukkhan’ti yogo karaṇīyo … pe … ‘ayaṃ dukkhanirodhagāminī
paṭipadā’ti yogo karaṇīyo”ti.
Aṭṭhamaṃ.
Saṃyutta Nikāya 56
Connected Discourses on the Truths
47. Yoke with a Hole (1)
“Bhikkhus, suppose a man would throw a yoke with a single hole into the great ocean, and there was
a blind turtle which would come to the surface once every hundred years. What do you think,
bhikkhus, would that blind turtle, coming to the surface once every hundred years, insert its neck into
that yoke with a single hole?”
“If it would ever do so, venerable sir, it would be only after a very long time.”
“Sooner, I say, would that blind turtle, coming to the surface once every hundred years, insert its neck
into that yoke with a single hole than the fool who has gone once to the nether world would regain
the human state. For what reason? Because here, bhikkhus, there is no conduct guided by the
Dhamma, no righteous conduct, no wholesome activity, no meritorious activity. Here there prevails
mutual devouring, the devouring of the weak. For what reason? Because, bhikkhus, they have not
seen the Four Noble Truths. What four? The noble truth of suffering … the noble truth of the way
leading to the cessation of suffering.
“Therefore, bhikkhus, an exertion should be made to understand: ‘This is suffering.’… An exertion
should be made to understand: ‘This is the way leading to the cessation of suffering.’”
Saṃyutta Nikāya 56
Connected Discourses on the Truths
1. I heard thus. At one time the Blessed One was living in the squirrels' sanctuary in the bamboo
grove in Rajagaha.
2. Then about thirty monks from Pava, all of them forest dwellers, dependants on morsel food,
wearers of rag robes limited to three and all with bonds approached the Blessed One, worshipped and
sat on a side.
3. Then it occurred to the Blessed One: “These thirty monks from Pava, are all forest dwellers,
dependants on morsel food, wearers of rag robes limited to three and all with bonds. What if I teach
them, so that their minds would be released from desires without holdings while sitting in these same
seats?”
4. Then the Blessed One addressed them: “Monks.” And those monks said-:”Yes, venerable sir.”
5. The Blessed One said: “Monks, without an end is the train of existence, a beginning cannot be
pointed out of beings enveloped in ignorance and bound by craving, running from one existence to
another.
6. “Monks, what is more, the blood you have shed on account of the neck being severed from the
body in this long journey in existences running from one existence to another, or the water in the four
great oceans?”
7. “Venerable sir, as the Blessed One has taught us the blood we have shed on account of the neck
being severed from the body in this long journey in existences running from one existence to another,
is more than the water in the four great oceans.”
8. “Excellent! Monks, you know the Teaching as taught by me.
9. “Indeed monks, the blood you have shed on account of the neck being severed from the body in
this long journey in existences running from one existence to another, is more than the water in the
four great oceans.
10. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were born as cattle, that blood is more than the water in the four great oceans.
11. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were born as buffaloes, that blood is more than the water in the four great oceans.
12. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were born as sheep, that blood is more than the water in the four great oceans.
13. “Monks, ... re ... born as goats ... re ...
14. “Monks, ... re ... born as deer... re ...
15. “Monks, ... re ... born as fowl ... re ...
16. “Monks, ... re ... born as pigs..... re ...
17. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were taken as robbers who destroy villages, that blood is more than the water in the
four great oceans ...
18. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were taken as robbers who wait in ambush, that blood is more than the water in the
four great oceans ...
19. “Monks, you have long experienced the severing of the neck from the body and the shedding of
blood when you were taken as robbers who went to other wives that blood is more than the water in
the four great oceans ...
20. “What is the reason? Monks, without an end is the train of existence, a beginning cannot be
pointed out, of beings enveloped in ignorance and bound by craving, running from one existence to
another.
“Monks, it is suitable that you should turn away from all determinations, fade and be released from
them.”
21. The Blessed One said thus and those monks delighted in the words of the Blessed One.
22. When this discourse was given the thirty monks of Pava experienced the release of their minds
from desires without holdings.
6.2.5 Kamma, Debt, and Meditation
1. “This world” of 31 realms is very complex; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.” Nothing
happens due to a single cause, and nothing happens just by itself: Multiple causes lead to multiple
effects.
2. In a perfect world, everyone will share everything equally, and everyone will be happy. But people
are born with different levels of not only wealth but also different levels of health, physical
appearance, capabilities, etc. These are the results of kamma (good and bad) accrued over very long
periods in the past.
3. No one has everything “just right.” So, we try to get what we don’t have or like to have. Every
time we crave for something and try to acquire those things by immoral means, knowingly or
unknowingly we get into debt.
§ When those akusala kamma (immoral deeds) involves another living being, we get into some
kind “sansāric relationship” with that being; this is how we have friends, family, AND
enemies. These things do not happen by chance.
4. NOTHING in this world happens by chance. Everything happens due to a cause, a reason. But
since results (vipāka) can materialize later, even in future lives, we cannot see this “cause and
effect” in most cases. When we do something harmful to another being we become indebted to that
being; that debt will have to be paid with interest that is many many times over. Thinks about the
following:
§ When we get a loan, we have to pay back the loan with interest. If we promise to pay back and
do not fulfill that commitment, we will have to pay it with interest sometime in the future.
Imagine how much interest we would have to pay on a $1000 loan at 6% interest over, say just
200 years, which is insignificant in the sansāric time scale. You can use the “72 rule”. That
means if you do not make any monthly payments, the amount you have to pay will double
every (72/interest rate) years. In this case, it will double every 12 years. It will double again in
another 12 years, i.e., after 24 years you will have to pay $4000. After only 40 years, the
amount will be $10,000. Only after 200 years it will a billion dollars!
§ Can you imagine how much money we may have to pay to settle even small that we took a
long, long time ago?
§ We have to pay back not only monetary transactions. Imagine how much would it cost to bring
up a child, as a mother does? It is unimaginable over long times.
§ When we have such debts, nature has set up many ways to pay off such debts. Many times the
same group of people is born to the same families, paying back “old debts.” Or one may
become a servant for another.
§ Many relationships that we have in this life arise from “long-term debt” from many lives in the
past. For example, people are born in the same family, same community, or same geographical
locations, for many, many lives. That is for just paying back debts and for claiming old debts.
In Sinhala, relationships are called “sanbandha” (=”san” + “bandha” where “san” is defilement
(saṅkhāra), and “bandha” is a connection; thus connection due to saṅkhāra). Sometimes old
creditors come back even in the form of annoying mosquitoes, ants, bugs, etc.
§ Now if one takes another’s life, one may have to sacrifice one’s own life many times over. That
is scary stuff, but we need to know that our actions will have consequences.
5. Instead of paying off such “old debts” that way, there is another way to pay back old debts. When
one does a good deed, one could transfer the merits of that good deed to old creditors called
“pattidāna” (this is commonly called “puñña anumodana“; see, “Transfer of Merits (Pattidāna)- How
Does It Happen?”).
6. In this beginning-less saṃsāra, we have been indebted to unbelievably many beings. Thus we
transfer the merits to all beings. We think in our mind, “May the merits of this good deed be shared
by all beings.”
§ If one does this genuinely, it will be quite beneficial in the long term. The Buddha said that this
is the most efficient way to pay back old debts. However, one needs to do this with sincerity,
truly understanding the suffering caused by one’s actions to others.living
7. One could accrue good merits not only by good deeds but also with insight meditation. The
Buddha stated that if one cultivates vipassanā mediation on anicca, dukkha, anatta, that leads many
more merits compared to even donations or giving. After the meditation session, one transfers the
merits to all beings.
§ The nice thing is that one does not “lose any merits” either. Giving merits itself is meritorious.
Also, one should forgive old debts from other beings. The mind is very powerful. If done with
right intention, also these thoughts will have beneficial consequences for oneself and other
living beings.
8. Therefore, we must try to alleviate the kamma vipāka from past kamma by using the mentioned
methods above. But the main purpose of such methods is actually to purify one’s mind.
§ We can pay off past debts gradually this way. However, bigger chunks are paid off by attaining
Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, and Arahant stages of Nibbāna. (Actually, the Buddha has
said that if one does the Ariya mettā meditation frequently, one could pay off the debts
associated with the kāma loka (first 11 realms). See, “5. Ariya Mettā Bhāvanā (Loving
Kindness Meditation).”
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, all those kamma vipāka that could have given rebirth in
the lowest four realms (apāyas) become nullified. When one reaches the Arahanthood, only
those kamma vipāka that get a chance to come to fruition during the remaining time in that life
will be paid off. Since there is no more rebirth, all remaining kamma vipāka do not get a chance
to come to fruition.
9. The first step in purifying one’s mind is to avoid dasa akusala; see, “Ten Immoral Action (Dasa
Akusala).” One does not need to try to do all at once (especially for those who are new to Buddha
Dhamma).
§ It is a life journey, and one can start slowly. First, trying to avoid bad actions, and then do
things that can be done without much stress. See the posts in the “Bhāvanā (Meditation)”
section and in particular, “2. The Basics in Meditation.”
§ There is no one watching, and only you know what your intentions are: whether they are moral
or immoral.
§ You will feel the benefits in terms of a less-stressed mind over time. It takes time, especially in
the beginning. Then it will accelerate when one starts seeing the benefits. When one starts
understanding that micchā diṭṭhi (wrong views) play a big role in one’s tendency to do some
immoral acts will automatically reduce. see, “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler
Analysis.”
10. The Buddha said one could become indebted in four ways:
§ Engaging in dasa akusala (10 unwholesome actions).
§ Getting someone else to do such acts.
§ Helping another in carrying out such acts.
§ Praising someone who is doing such acts.
Thus one can become indebted in 40 ways. By avoiding all that will make one joyful (adhimokko or
sense of well being). That will give impetus to accelerate one’s efforts. Also, see, “Habits and Goals,”
and “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada).”
Another more in-depth analysis at, “Difference Between Giving up Valuables and Losing Interest in
Worthless”, ………….
6.2.6 How do we Decide which View is Wrong View (Diṭṭhi)?
More than 99% of one’s immoral acts have their causes in micchā diṭṭhi (wrong views); see, “What is
the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“. Thus it is critical to understand what wrong views are.
§ A simpler, yet a fundamental, analysis on wrong views can be found at, “Wrong Views
(Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A Simpler Analysis“.
1. We all have our views about different things: politics, religions, sports, lifestyles, etc. And most
times it is fun to talk about and debate whose views are the correct ones. But each one of us have
views based on a limited knowledge about only a fraction of “this world”.
§ A good way to figure out whether one view is better than another is to see whether that view
provides more insight AND has more explanatory power about the world.
§ In fact, that is the only way. Because anybody can just say, “my view is better than yours”.
2. When I refer to “diṭṭhi” or wrong views, these are the wrong views per Buddha. It must be noted
that “diṭṭhi”means views, but in Pāli literature it has been common to call “micchā
diṭṭhi” (pronounced “michcha“) or wrong views as just “diṭṭhi“. It is critical to have the “right
views” because otherwise we may be taking wrong decisions, and that could have very bad outcomes
for billions of years to come. In order to make right decisions we need to “see the whole picture” or
the world view of the Buddha.
§ Of course, one is entitled to have his own views. It is just that according to Buddha Dhamma
certain views are not only wrong, but could lead to disastrous outcomes, and those are called
diṭṭhi. One either accepts this fact, or rejects it. It is a good idea to look at the “big picture” of
the Buddha and THEN decide whether it makes sense or not. First let us see why one should
even go through this exercise of looking at the big picture.
3. When one does not have a clear overall picture, one makes bad decisions. For example, a fish does
not see the string or the hook, only sees the worm, and gets into trouble. If it saw the whole picture,
with the string and the hook, it may realize that there is something wrong and would not try to grab
the worm. If it saw the man standing on land holding the pole, that would have been another clue; but
the fish can only see its “domain”. Just like that we can only see “our domain” within the wider 31
realms, and we do not see the level of suffering in other lower realms.
§ We are inherently incapable of seeing the “whole picture” because our sense faculties are
formed by our kamma to be aware of only a part of whole existence; you may get an idea of
what I am referring to in the post, “Consciousness Dependence on Number of Dimensions“.
Therefore, no matter how smart each of us is, we cannot even imagine this whole picture by
ourselves. It takes a very special, very pure mind to see the whole picture, the mind of a
Buddha; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Introduction“, and follow-up posts.
4. The Buddha described this in the parable of the “elephant and the six blind men”. Each blind man
is feeling or exploring a different part of the elephant, and comes up with his view of what an
elephant is: The one examines the tail says the elephant is like a rope, one examining a leg says the
elephant is like a pillar, etc.
§ The person holding the tail is certain that the elephant is like a rope “because I know what I
experience; you cannot tell me it is not like a rope”. He just does not realize that he is
experiencing only part of the whole elephant.
5. Until a Buddha comes to this world, any human can only see a very small part of the whole
picture. Like the little girl in the video being able to see the whole elephant, only a Buddha can see
the whole picture about our true existence.
§ Mathematician Kurt Gödel proved this mathematically in his Incompleteness Theorem, which
says that it is not possible to discover complete truth of a closed system within that system; see,
“Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem“. Thus science will NEVER be able to discover a
COMPLETE set of laws about the nature. It can only uncover parts and the parts that have been
discovered are totally consistence with Buddha Dhamma.
6. According to the Buddha, diṭṭhis are like that: some people say there is a rebirth process, and some
say not. Some say when we die we will either go to hell or heaven. Some say, things really exist in a
permanent way, and others say it is all a mirage. All these are diṭṭhis, because none of these fit the
WHOLE PICTURE. None of these can explain the vagaries of life; see, “Vagaries of Life and the
Way to Seek “Good Rebirths”“.
§ For example, we can only see two of the 31 realms of existence: animal and human realms. We
are not aware that most beings are trapped in the lowest four realms where there is much more
suffering than we can see in the human and animal realms. We do not realize that our immoral
actions from this life, AND from our past lives (that we are not aware of) could give us rebirth
in those lower four realms; this is “law of kamma” another part of the “big picture”. There
is evidence for rebirth; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
7. Buddha Dhamma cannot be fully understood without having learned of that “big picture” from a
Buddha or from a person who has learnt the correct version of it. Now, since the Buddha is not here
and there are many versions of Buddha Dhamma, the question is how do we figure out which version
to believe. The Buddha gave a solution to this problem: Find the version that satisfy the following
conditions:
§ All aspects should be consistent with the Suttas and Vinaya (and thus Abhidhamma); these were
transmitted orally for about 500 years and then written down in the Pāli Tipiṭaka about 2000
years ago (Pāli Tipiṭaka).
§ And all three descriptions in the Tipiṭaka (sutta, vinaya, abhidhamma) must be consistent with
each other.
8. This second requirement is there to catch any mistakes made in the (especially oral) transmission
from the time of the Buddha. It must be kept in mind that all three sets were formulated for easy oral
transmission. I know several suttas by heart which I leaned when I was little; they have been
formulated to be easily remembered. And there were different groups of Bhikkus assigned the
responsibility for different sections during the time of oral transmission. Also see, “Preservation of
the Dhamma“.
9. In a series of posts I have provided evidence that many versions of “Buddhism” being practiced
today do not pass the above tests. All Mahayana versions are in blatant contradiction to the teachings
in the Tipiṭaka, and some key concepts taught in Theravāda are also inconsistent with Tipiṭaka; see,
“Why is it Critical to Find the Pure Buddha Dhamma?“, and the follow-up posts.
§ Once one finds the key Dhamma concepts that are self-consistent, then one can easily figure out
what is diṭṭhi and what is not. If anyone can point out anything on this website that is not
internally consistent, I would appreciate it. Because my goal is genuine: to find and document
the original teachings of the Buddha.
10. Thus it is important to realize that diṭṭhi is an established view (a view one is not even willing to
rethink) about the world, that is inconsistent with Buddha Dhamma. Let us take a few examples:
§ Two good examples are the two views of “there is a self” and “there is no self”; see, “Diṭṭhi
(Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct Views)“. Both are wrong views according to the
Buddha: there is only an ever-changing lifestream that progresses according to cause and effect
(paṭicca samuppāda); see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ Another diṭṭhi many people have is that there is no rebirth process, or that there is a rebirth
process but we will never be born as an animal because we have not done anything bad in this
life. It is just a belief, there are no supporting evidence to back that up. On the other hand, the
rebirth process involving all 31 realms and the natural law of kamma, together with paṭicca
samuppāda, and other key concepts like Tilakkhaṇa can explain EVERYTHING that we
experience. What needs to be understood is that ALL THOSE PIECES MUST BE THERE to
complete the whole picture.
11. Just like a blind man holding onto a leg of the elephant and saying “This is what I experience and
the elephant is like a pillar. I know what I experience, and I am right”, we hold onto diṭṭhis that are
inconsistent with the nature’s laws. Once one hears the message of a Buddha, one should at least
examine the credibility of that message by looking at the evidence he presented. Ultimately, one has
to make the decision to accept Buddha’s message or not. This is why no one can lead anyone else to
salvation. It is all in one’s own mind.
§ Let me give an example how limited our world view had been even two hundred years ago.
People believed that Earth was the only planet with the Sun going around the Earth. So, when
the Buddha said there are innumerable world systems with other Suns and Moons, people
thought that was a loony idea. There are many such diṭṭhis that have been proven to be wrong
by science over the past hundred years or so; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction“.
12. Some of the views we have are deeply ingrained, and not easy to get rid of. The main thing is
NOT to take a firm stand on things that the Buddha called diṭṭhi and say, “I know this to be true, and
only this to be true” and to cling to them. Even a Sotāpanna may not be fully convinced that, for
example, there is a arupaloka, but he/she has not ruled that out, i.e., does not have a diṭṭhi. Only
an Arahant has “complete” Sammā Diṭṭhi.
§ As one learns pure Dhamma, one will have more and more confidence on the world view of the
Buddha and will get rid of the wrong views. Since the mind cannot be forced to accept
anything, this “change of vision” comes only through learning the pure Dhamma and through
the enhanced life experience, which means purifying the mind; see, “The Importance of
Purifying the MInd“.
§ We cannot pick and choose parts of Buddha Dhamma that we like if we want to reap the
full benefits. Of course one could decide to “live with” parts of Dhamma that one is
comfortable with. The Buddha said to accept his teachings only if they make sense. To make
sense though, one needs to look at the whole picture too. Otherwise, it will be like a blind man
examining only the leg of an elephant and saying it really feels like a pillar.
13. Diṭṭhi is one of 14 akusala cetasika and one of the ten kilesa; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa
Akusala)“, and “Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct Views)“. Diṭṭhi have been
described in many ways by the Buddha. At the Sotāpanna stage, those diṭṭhis that could lead to
rebirth in the apāyas (sathkaya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, silabbata paramasa) are permanently removed; see,
“Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Cittas“.
§ Thus it is important to realize that the Sotāpanna stage CANNOT be reached until niyata
micchā diṭṭhi or ESTABLISHED wrong views are removed. For example, one should not hold
on to a firm belief that there is no rebirth process; one should at least keep an open mind.
§ Stated most succinctly, micchā dithi is the wrong perception of nicca, sukha, atta, i.e.,
things can be be maintained to one’s satisfaction, thus lasting happiness is possible, and
thus it is fruitful to stay in this world of 31 realms. One attains the first stage of Sammā
diṭṭhi when one comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta to a certain extent at the Sotāpanna
stage.
14. The Buddha said his Dhamma is hard to understand, and it is not like anything that anyone taught
before, except for another Buddha: It is “Pubbe anunussetu Dhammesu“, “A Dhamma that has not
been heard before”. This is why the Buddha worried just after the Enlightenment whether he will be
able to teach this difficult Dhamma to normal human beings. It takes a real effort to glean the
message of the Buddha.
§ Most of us have different types of diṭṭhis; see, “Why Do People Enjoy Immoral Deeds? – Diṭṭhi
Is Key“
§ For a description of the ten micchā diṭṭhi, see, “Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths, and
Samādhi“.
6.2.7 Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths, and Samādhi
Buddha Dhamma explains how three kinds of worldviews lead to three types of samādhi (basically
mindset) via three different paths. All these are discussed in detail in other posts, but here we
summarize them. You can use the Search box on top right to find relevant posts.
1. Have you ever wondered how some people have any “peace of mind” while engaging in
abominable actions day in and day out? It is easier to excuse someone who commits a bad act in a
“moment of fury”, i.e, when such action was not pre-planned (and the common law accommodates
for that).
§ But some people (think Hitler, Pol Pot in Cambodia) plan evil acts for years, and they seem to
thrive doing it; they do not feel any remorse; rather they enjoy what they do. This is because
just like facilitating a journey towards Nibbāna for someone who embarks on the Noble
Eightfold Path, the nature also lets someone go in the opposite direction too. “Dhammo ha ve
rakkati dhammacari” applies to both kinds of “Dhamma”.
§ Dhamma is what one “bears”. If one “carries good Dhamma”, one will be guided in the “good
direction” by nature. In the same way, one who “carries bad Dhamma” will be guided in the
opposite direction. Both can get into “samādhi” doing it.
2. Samādhi (“sama”+”adhi” where “sama” means “same” and “adhi” means “dominance”) means the
object becomes the priority and the mind gets focused on it; as we discussed in many posts, when the
mind becomes focused on one object (arammana), no matter what the object is, the ekaggata cetasika
takes over and make the mind latched “on to it”.
§ When the minds gets to samādhi, the mind feels calm because it is stopped from jumping back
and forth among many thought objects (arammana).
§ This is how one gets to not only samādhi but also anariya jhāna (a jhāna is a deeper state of
absorption or samādhi) using breath meditation, just by focusing the mind on the breath.
§ Thus, a master thief gets to micchā samādhi when intently focusing on the plan of a grand
robbery in minute details. Not only does he get a joy out of it, his mind helps him work out the
fine details; but someone with micchā samādhi can never get into a jhāna.
§ It does not matter what the focus is, nature helps get it done if one really sets his/her mind to it.
This is why “Dhammo ha ve rakkati dhammacari” can work in any situation. The human mind
is very powerful, but it can be used in all three directions.
3. However, that does not change the fact that outcomes of “bad actions” will ALWAYS be bad in
the long run. This is a universal law called “beeja niyama” which is one of five natures’ primary laws
called “niyama” (“niyama” in Pāli or Sinhala means “fixed”, “unchangeable”); even though most
times it is pronounced “niyāma”, the correct pronunciation is “niyama”.
§ Bad kamma result in “bad kamma beeja” which will ONLY bear “bad fruits”; also, the
consequences will be proportional to the “size” of the kamma beeja (kamma seed). And the
same holds true for good kamma seeds.
4. Now, when someone gets on the “wrong track” mostly through bad associates or bad environment,
one has the “ten types of micchā diṭṭhi”, and one could get into the “micchā eightfold path”. The ten
types of micchā diṭṭhi are:
§ At that stage, one’s mind automatically rejects immoral acts because one’s mind sees the
futility as well as the danger of such acts. What is the point of having some sense pleasure if it
lasts only a short time AND could lead to much misery in the future for long times?
8. The critical point is that when one becomes a Sotāpanna, one’s mind (and the brain) will be
changed so that one will not act even impulsively, let alone capable of pre-planning an act that could
yield rebirth in the apāyas.
§ Scientists do confirm that there are significant changes in the brain just due to breath meditation
alone; see, “Truine Brain: How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits”.
§ Such future brain studies on people engaged in the correct ānāpāna meditation can be expected
to yield profound changes in a brain when a person attains the Sotāpanna stage.
9. Thus one becomes a Sotāpanna (enter the stream) from the mundane sammā diṭṭhi stage by
comprehending the true nature of the world (i.e., it is fruitless to be born ANYWHERE in the 31
realms) by learning the meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta from a Buddha (who discovers them), or
from a true disciple of the Buddha.
§ Once one becomes a Sotāpanna, the Path to Nibbāna becomes clear, and one does not need any
more help. One will cultivate the next six steps and get to Ariya Sammā Samādhi and to the
Arahant stage of Nibbāna.
10. I need to re-emphasize the difference between “living a moral life” which is promoted by most of
world’s major religions, and the emphasize on “purifying the mind” and “comprehending the true
nature of the wider world of 31 realms” in Buddha Dhamma.
§ One needs to approach this extra step first by being “moral”, i.e., by following the mundane
sammā eightfold path and getting rid of some of the five hindrances. Then one’s mind is
purified to an extent to be able to “see through the fog of ignorance” and comprehend anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ Buddha’s message about the “suffering hidden in the midst of apparent sense pleasures” is
indeed a “Dhamma that has never been known”. It could be contrary to one’s instincts, because
all we have known from the beginningless time is about enjoying the sense pleasures.
Note: The three kinds of eightfold paths, micchā diṭṭhi, and micchā samādhi are described in the
Mahā Chattareesaka Sutta; see, “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
6.2.8 Implications of the Rebirth Process in Daily Life and in Society
1. Unless one develops abhiññā powers via meditation, the rebirth process cannot be “proven” with
certainty. Yet, there is mounting evidence for it that cannot be ignored either; see, “Evidence for
Rebirth”.
§ Putting that question aside, let us look at some mundane implications IF indeed the rebirth
process, as described by the Buddha, is correct.
2. The first thing to realize is how short this life of 100 years or so is. It is unimaginably small. Our
universe has been there for about 14 BILLION years and that is just a blip in the cosmic time scale.
3. Looking at the world history, most calamities of war could have been prevented if people
understood how short this life is. Where are those emperors and kings today, who sacrificed so many
human lives to capture another country or to maintain their powers?
§ Because of the atrocities they committed, they are most likely to be in the lowest of the apāyas.
§ For the briefest time of enjoyment and power, they accumulated so much bad kamma to spend
billions of years in total misery.
4. What significance would race, color, ethnicity, religion, beauty, money, etc would have in one’s
actions if one really understood that all those are not only temporary, but one could be on the other
side in the very next life? This is a topic that is worth contemplating a lot.
5. Let us take the struggle between the Palestinians and the Israelis, because it is making headlines
these days; one could take any other conflict. According to Buddha Dhamma, there are two effects
that come to play here.
§ One in either camp will develop a mindset to hate the other side, take revenge for some action,
etc. If they have any kammic energy for the human “bhava” they will come back to the same
place with matching “gathi”, looking for revenge; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati + ichcha” +
“Sama + uppada“.
§ The other aspect is for any bad action one does in such a conflict is going to have consequences
RELATED to that act. When person A kills or harms another person B, A becomes indebted to
B. One way to “pay back this debt” is for B to be born as a child to A; see, “Kamma, Debt, and
Meditation“. Isn’t that the biggest irony of all? A Palestinian (Israeli) becoming the child of an
Israeli (Palestinian)?
§ Either way, the conflict will continue for a long time, unless both sides realize the folly of it all.
§ This is true for many other conflicts that have been going-on for generations. It is likely that
most of the characters involved have been the same. They are too much “involved” in the
conflict and are unable to free their minds from it.
6. Let us take another example of a slave owner in the old days. That person made a lot of wealth by
exploiting those slaves, but for how long? At most 100 years. Where are those slave owners now?
They would either be in one of the lowest four realms OR could be a slave himself somewhere,
possibly to a former slave.
§ It is easy to extend this analysis to many other cases; it is good idea to contemplate on such
things. It makes one understand the true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta. That is unfruitful
to do immoral things to achieve a brief moment of sense pleasure, where the consequences can
play out for much longer time in a future birth.
7. Yet we strive for a quarter of our lives to go through the basic educational process (which is the
only part that makes any sense in the long term), and basically most of the rest of the life to
“accumulate things and prestige”.
§ We do not stop and think about how the last years of the life are going to be, let alone about
future lives. By the time we have made much of those accomplishments, our senses start
degrading, and no matter how much money we have, we will never be able to maintain our
physical appearance or the level of sense pleasure to our liking.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Done Got Old
§ The problem is that we are too busy to contemplate on such issues because we are in a frantic
struggle to “make money for survival”, and whatever vacation time we get we would not want
to spend that time for contemplation, but to go on trip or do some such activity to “enjoy
ourselves”. But when one gets back from a vacation, it feels like one needs another to recover
from those hectic activities.
8. There is another reason that people do not want to even think about such things; it could be
depressing. But I can say with conviction that once one understands the “true nature of this world”, it
WILL lead to a peaceful state of mind. It will also be easier to get into samādhi and jhānas.
§ The reason is that as one understands anicca, dukkha, anatta (the futility of doing immoral
things to gain sense satisfaction in world that is INHERENTLY not setup for that), one
GRADUALLY loses attachment to worldly things and this makes the mind peaceful; this is the
root cause of nirāmisa sukha; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?”.
§ Nibbāna or “Nivana” or “cooling down” is not like any sense pleasure. Rather, it is a relief. A
good analogy is the following: suppose someone has a migraine headache; then the day that
headache disappears, that person will get a HUGE sense of relief. It is not a sense pleasure, but
rather a feeling of well-being that is hard to express.
9. I can give one example to make this point. Many people who start understanding anicca, dukkha,
anatta, realize that they do not watch TV or go to entertainment events as much as they used to. This
is not something they do deliberately, it just happens. They would rather enjoy a meditation session at
home or read/listen to Dhamma. It may be already happening to some of you.
§ The mind cannot be forced. It just takes the better path; but the mind has to be exposed to the
better, correct path. This is why giving true Dhamma is the best giving.
6.2.9 What Does Buddha Dhamma Say about Creator, Satan, Angels, and
Demons?
1. While the concept of a Creator God is absent in Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism), some beings fit into
some conventional ideas on satan, angels, and demons, such as “Seth” and “Ramtha.” Since some
readers may not be familiar with “Seth” and “Ramtha,” let me first provide some background.
§ Jane Roberts wrote a series of popular books based on “Seth,” a being who could “possess” her
body with her permission, and spoke to her husband about various things about the world; see,
for example, “Seth Speaks” by Jane Roberts (1994). Seth commented on diverse issues and
made many predictions too. I am not sure how those “predictions” worked out, but I am sure
the success rate must be no better than any human making such predictions.
§ Then there is “Ramtha”,” who speaks through J. Z. knight; see, for example, “Ramtha -The
White Book” by J. Z. Knight (2005). He is a very benevolent being, proving honest advice on
how to live a better life. As I understand, there is a significant following for Ramtha.
2. Therefore, there are two issues (or concepts) to be discussed:
§ First, there is the more predominant belief of a “Creator God” in many religions. That concept
is of course in direct contradiction with not only Buddha Dhamma, but also with modern
science. The principle of Causality is the basis of both Buddha Dhamma. There must be a
cause(s) for every effect.
§ On the other hand, modern science does not believe in any “unseen beings.” Science does not
attempt to tackle phenomena not measurable with physical instruments.
§ We will discuss both the concept of a creator and also possible influence by unseen living
beings.
3. Some background on the idea of a Creator God: In my early stages of learning about other
religions, I read a variety of books ranging from those by C. S. Lewis (“Mere Christianity” is an
excellent introduction) to “The Language of God” by Francis Collins (2007) to understand the “case
for a Creator”; see, “The Language of God” by Francis Collins“.
§ From all those books, the books by these two authors better focus on the issue to provide a
rational basis for believing in a creator God.
4. As I understand, one reason for those two authors for believing in a Creator is the existence of
Moral law. How can we know and feel the truth of the Moral laws unless God instilled those in us?
§ On the other side, both authors struggled with the issue of Satan (or Devil), and why there is
suffering.
§ Why would God allow the existence of Satan, and the associated immoral behavior by people?
The main conclusion was that God chose to give the man free will, and the man abused it.
§ Lewis in particular worried about the existence of suffering. Why would God allow that?
5. Let us see what Buddha Dhamma says about those two issues.
§ Of course, in Buddha Dhamma, there is no Creator. Everything happens due to (multiple)
causes and by definition, there is no first cause (i.e., a Creator). The “world” has existed as far
as one (with supernormal powers or abhiññā) can see; for details, see, “The Grand Unified
Theory of Dhamma.”
§ Even people without abhiññā powers can remember one or a few past lives; see, “Evidence for
Rebirth.” In some exceptional cases, some can recall multiple past lives under hypnosis; see the
book “Many Lives, Many Masters” by Brian Weiss, who is a psychotherapist.
6. In Buddha Dhamma, “the good” and “the bad” in this world are all built into nature’s laws. Any
sentient being experiences “the world” with its sense faculties, and that experience comes in the form
of thoughts (citta).
§ Based on those sense inputs AND one’s gati AT THAT TIME, one generates various “good”
and “bad” responses. These responses first manifested as mere thoughts, but we may act on
them further by speech and bodily actions.
§ There are 52 mental factors (cetasika) that include both “good” characteristics (such as
kindness, generosity, fear and shame of wrong, etc.), and “bad” traits (such as greed, hate,
shamelessness and fearlessness of wrong doing, etc.). In the “Abhidhamma” and “Tables and
Summaries” sections.
§ Until one becomes one of the “attha purisa puggala” (eight Noble Persons), one WILL have
both good and bad gati that COULD lead to births in the apāyas.
7. Thus there is no “Creator God” or a “Satan.” Each person acts on his/her own free will and commit
moral or immoral acts. What a person today is the “cumulative result” of all one’s actions in the deep
past. These manifest as our character (or “gathi” or “gathi”) or sansāric habits (or “āsavas”). There
are many posts on this issue at the site, starting with “Habits, Goals, and Character (Gathi).”
§ And these gathi and āsavas are in constant flux; thus, one could be a murderer one day, but
then through sheer willpower can decide to be a “better person.” There is no “soul” or a fixed
“self.” One cannot say there is “no-self” either, because one’s “gathi” or “āsava” are unique
characteristics and are “one’s own”; see, “What Reincarnates? – The Concept of a Lifestream“.
8. And no one else can make that change but oneself. Even the Buddha can only show the way to
change, i.e., how to change these “gathi” and the “āsavas” for the better. When one follows that one
can feel the “cooling down” or ‘niveema” or the nirāmisa sukha. That is the real goal in Buddhist
meditation; see, “1. Introduction to Buddhist Meditation.”
§ The “moral code” comes naturally out of this big picture. One can lead a peaceful life by
practicing “dasa kusala” (ten moral acts), and avoiding “dasa akusala” (ten immoral acts); see,
“Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)” and the follow up post.
9. Let us also discuss briefly “demons” and “angels” (or other gods). Most Creator-based religions
have such entities. And they are supposed to be able to influence humans. Are there beings like that
according to Buddha Dhamma?
§ Yes. In Buddha Dhamma, the world is much more complicated than with just demons and
angels. We can see and experience only two realms (human and animal) out of 31 possible
realms in this world; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.”
§ If someone develops abhiññā powers (see, “Power of the Human Mind” and follow-up posts),
depending on the level attained one could “see” some or many of these other beings. Some
people can do this at present.
10. However, even the majority of people with abhiññā power can only “see” some inhabitants in the
lowest 11 realms or “kāma loka”. That includes the six deva loka with less dense bodies than ours.
§ The beings in the rūpa loka and the arūpa loka have “bodies” even less dense than those in the
deva realms, and it is even more difficult to “see” them.
§ The six realms in the deva loka are the closest thing to a “heaven” according to the Buddha
Dhamma. Those beings have bodies that are free from physical illnesses, and there is much
more happiness there than in the human world. And they have long lifetimes. However, any
being in any higher realm can end up in the lowest four planes (apāyas) in the future unless
they reach at least the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
11. Some of these beings can communicate with humans with or without abhiññā powers. Some of
these beings are benevolent, and others who are evil. As pointed out in the posts on “gathi”, a being
normally communicates with a human with similar “gathi” or character.
§ Thus an evil being (we could say “a demon”) tries typically to communicate with a human with
similar lousy character. They may try to impress the human and try to get their agenda fulfilled.
§ A benevolent being (we could say “an angel” or “a god”) is usually a deva from the six deva
realms. They like to help out people with good character, but usually, do not try to
communicate directly. Typically, the person may not even know about it.
12. Therefore, many such beings like to “show off” and also genuinely try to help people live a better
life. But those beings themselves are “travelers of samsāra” who happen to have a good birth for a
more extended period.
§ Then some beings are evil or with bad intentions. I am not aware of any prominent cases like
those mentioned in #1 above. However, there are many reports on “hearing voices” and even
committing crimes based on the instructions through such voices.
13. Those beings with bad intentions cannot influence us if our mindsets are NOT COMPATIBLE
with theirs. That is a crucial point to understand!
§ One is ALWAYS responsible for one’s action. If one is influenced by an “unseen evil
being,” that is also due to one’s own lack of morality (one has cultivated bad “gati“).
§ Just as in common law, ignorance of Nature’s laws is not an excuse.
§ This is why we all have been trapped in this suffering-filled rebirth process for this long. We
had not been able to understand Nature’s laws. Only a Buddha can understand those, and we
should be thankful that we live in a time when that message is still available.
§ We need to learn Dhamma, get rid of bad gati, and cultivate good gati. That will pave the way
to becoming a Noble Person and thus be free of all future suffering!
14. This world is very complex, and we perceive only a tiny part of it. But the point is that there
is no place anywhere in the 31 realms that can provide permanent happiness.
§ There is no point in pursuing such demons or even angels. They are in the same predicament, or
worse, compared to us. Those benevolent beings will help us, even without seeking help, if they
see the good in us.
§ As humans, we have the unique advantage of learning the truth about the dangers of this rebirth
process (saṃsāra) and work towards getting out of it by seeking Nibbāna or “cooling down.”
That was THE message of the Buddha.
6.2.10 Paṭisandhi Citta – How the Next Life is Determined According to
Gathi
1. The transition of a life-stream from one existence (bhava) to another takes place during the last
citta vīthi of the present bhava. For example, when a human is reborn an animal or a deva. For a
fundamental description of this process, see, “Cuti-Paṭisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description.”
§ But here let us look at how different types of kamma, as well as one’s “gati” (pronounced
“gathi”) lead to corresponding rebirths in different realms.
2. As discussed in “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta,” all ten types of akusala kamma are
done with 12 types of akusala citta.
§ Only those five akusala cittā with wrong views (micchā diṭṭhi) or vicikicchā can lead to rebirth
in the apāyā (four lower realms). Those akusala cittā lead to just one paṭisandhi vipāka citta,
and it is called the “akusala vipāka upekkhā santīraṇa citta.” That is the type of cittā that
comes to the mind of the dying person destined for the apāyā.
§ The two dislike-rooted (paṭigha) cittā do not arise at the Anāgāmi stage. The remaining five
akusala cittā do not occur only in Arahants; see, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta.”
3. That one paṭisandhi citta can lead to rebirth in an uncountable number of “bhava” in the four
lowest realms. In the animal realm itself, there is an uncountable number of varieties.
§ Thus what determines the actual “place of birth” in the four lowest realms is one’s “gati”. Once
the fate is determined by to be born in one of the four lowest realms due to an akusala kamma,
the next step for nature is to match “gati to gati”. A greedy person is likely to be matched with
a birth in the peta realm (hungry ghosts). A vicious person is expected to be destined to the hell
(niraya); see, “How Character (Gathi) Leads to Bhava and Jāti.”
4. Now let us look at how rebirth takes place according to one’s kusala kamma. The merits of a
kusala kamma are ENHANCED when done without moha, i.e., without micchā diṭṭhi (or with at least
mundane sammā diṭṭhi). That is discussed in the post, “A Simple way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and
Avoid Demerits (Akusala).”
§ Thus out of the eight mahā kusala kamma (great meritorious actions), four are done with
knowledge. They, of course also alobha and adosa, i.e., generosity and loving-kindness. Since
they have all three kusala roots, they are “tihetuka” birth (“thi” means three and “hethu” means
roots). They lead to the best kind of rebirths. Those are “tihetuka paṭisandhi” or “rebirth with
three roots.”
§ The other four mahā kusala kamma have generosity and loving kindness, but without mundane
or lokuttara sammā diṭṭhi. Thus the resulting kamma vipāka lead to “dvihethuka paṭisandhi” or
“rebirth with two roots.” They also point to birth in the realms 5 through 11 (i.e., in the human
and deva realms), but they will have less kammic power for that birth.
5. It is only those with tihetuka paṭisandhi who can attain magga phala and attain Ariya jhānās in this
life. Those with “dvihetuka paṭisandhi” lack in necessary wisdom (but this is NOT book-knowledge);
they can make progress and acquire the essential merits to have a future tihetuka paṭisandhi. But it is
impossible to say who has a tihetuka or dvihetuka paṭisandhi; only a Buddha is capable of that.
§ There is one more paṭisandhi citta that is possible from a lower grade mahā kusala kamma.
That is also a kamma done without knowledge and with less enthusiasm. It involves a kusala
vipāka upekkhā santīraṇa citta, and is a “rebirth with no good roots.” That is an “ahetuka
paṭisandhi.” Note that here even though there are two roots present technically, they are very
weak due to absence of enthusiasm. For example, some people participate in exemplary work
just because others do it, or they did not have a choice.
§ Such an “ahetuka paṭisandhi” can leads to births only in the human or the lowest deva realm.
Such a birth is comparatively easy to recognize (but not always). People with ahetuka
paṭisandhi have low IQ, could be blind or deaf at birth,. Or they are severely handicapped in
other ways.
§ However, such deficiencies COULD occur due to problems encountered in the womb (if the
mother is a drug addict or had an ailment during the pregnancy). That is why, in some cases, we
see people with above characteristics, but are smart. They are not born with an ahetuka
paṭisandhi and could learn Dhamma and attain jhānas.
6. Thus we see that there is only one paṭisandhi citta due to the ten akusala kamma (from 12
akusala citta). There are nine possible paṭisandhi citta due to the eight mahā kusala kamma.
§ The remaining paṭisandhi citta lead to rebirth in the Brahma loka (16 rūpa loka and four arūpa
loka). These rise due to jhānic states: rebirth in the rūpa loka are due to the 5 rūpa jhānas and
rebirth in the four arūpa loka are due to the four arūpa jhānas.
7. Therefore, only 19 paṭisandhi citta that lead to rebirth anywhere in the 31 realms. As we have
discussed, there is an uncountable number of species (we ourselves can see numerous animal
species). What differentiates different species are the “gathi.” You can see that each species has
its own “character”: Even within a given species, there are differences in “gati”. If you look at dogs,
there are some who are vicious and then there are cuddly (poodles).
§ In the days of the Buddha, when someone dies, relatives of the deceased usually ask the
Buddha “what the jāti is, and what the gati” is for the new birth. These days we don’t have the
Buddha to clarify that for us. But we can sort of guess what “gati” we have and make sure to
change them for the better.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, any “gati” matching those in the apāyā is permanently
removed. That means hate, greed, ignorance at the highest levels.
§ At the Sakadāgāmī stage, one’s liking to a “dense body” to enjoy sense pleasures is no longer
there. Such a “dense body” is one that can get diseases. Thus a Sakadāgāmī is never born in
human or lower realms where sickness and body aches are a fact of life.
§ Then at the Anāgāmī stage, one loses craving for enjoying pleasures with the nose, tongue, and
the body. Then one can find matching “gati” only in the rūpa and arūpa loka.
§ At the Arahant stage, one loses craving for any sensory pleasure associated with even a trace of
matter. At that stage, the mind attains the true freedom; no more “gati” left.
1. This section is for those who are interested not merely in pursuing a good life or seeking better
lives in future births. Other religions can also provide guidance for those goals to a certain extent.
The uniqueness in the Buddha’s message is that there is perpetual suffering in the unending cycle of
rebirths in “this world”, the root causes for that suffering, that there is possible release from that
suffering (Nibbāna), and there is a way to attain Nibbāna.
2. The first stage of attaining Nibbāna is the Sotāpanna (Stream Entry) stage. In order to reach this
stage, one needs to have a complete understanding of Buddha Dhamma (or the laws of nature). Since
only a Buddha can discover these laws, it is not possible for anyone (no matter how intelligent) to
discover these laws by oneself.
3. Once the Sotāpanna stage is attained, one knows what to do next. Thus there is no need to get
further information from anywhere else. My goal with this site is to provide necessary information to
attain the Sotāpanna stage.
Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna subsection has a number of posts describing the Sotāpanna stage.
Posts in this section:
o Attha Purisa Puggalā – Eight Noble Persons
o Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava
o The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of āsavas
o Kaṇha (Dark) and Sukka (Bright) Kamma and Kammakkhaya
o Dasa Samyojana – Bonds in Rebirth Process
o The Cooling Down Process (Nibbāna) – How the Root Causes are Removed
o Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta so Important?
o How to Cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path Starting with Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta
o Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta
o Difference Between Giving Up Valuables and Losing Interest in Worthless
o Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata
6.3.1 Aṭṭha Purisa Puggalā – Eight Noble Persons
Introduction
1. There are many suttas that describe various characteristics of Aṭṭha Purisa Puggalā or Ariyas
(Noble Persons). We will discuss some key features in this post, especially regarding the maximum
time taken to attain the Arahanthood.
§ There are likely to be several different ways that Noble Persons are defined in the Tipiṭaka.
Here we will start by considering a categorization based on the state of development of pañca
indriya in a set of suttas in Saṃyutta Nikāya 48.
§ The “WebLink: suttacentral: Suddhika Sutta (SN 48.1)” states what the pañca indriya are:
Saddhā indriya, vīriyiya indriya, sati indriya, samādhi indriya, paññā indriya.
2. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Vibhaṅga Sutta (SN 48.9)” explains what those five indriya
are. I will just provide a short translation to get the idea.
itipi
§ Saddhā indriya is optimized when one truly realizes the truth of the virtues of the Buddha (
so bhagava…”: “That Blessed One is an Arahant, perfectly enlightened, accomplished in true
knowledge and conduct, perfectly purified, knower of the wider world (of 31 realms),
unsurpassed in virtue, teacher of devas, brahmas, and humans, the Enlightened One, the
Blessed One”. This is about the Buddha as a person AND even more importantly, the
comprehension of the concept of Buddha as “bhava uddha“ [Buddha = bhava + uddha: one
who figured out how to stop existences (bhava) from arising. uddha is rooting out]; see,
“Supreme Qualities of Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha“.
§ Viriya indriya represents one’s effort in cultivating kusala and discarding akusala.
§ Sati indriya represents one’s ability to be mindful of one’s thoughts, speech, and actions.
§ Samādhi indriya indicates one’s ability to focus on Nibbāna and to get to samādhi.
§ Paññā indriya represents one’s comprehension of the Four Noble Truths about sansāric
suffering.
Categorization Based on Pañca Indriya
3. WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiyasaṅkhitta Sutta (SN 48.13) states, “Imesaṃ kho, bhikkhave,
pañcannaṃ indriyānaṃ samattā paripūrattā arahaṃ hoti, tato mudutarehi anāgāmī hoti, tato
mudutarehi sakadāgāmī hoti, tato mudutarehi sotāpanno hoti, tato mudutarehi dhammānusārī hoti,
tato mudutarehi saddhānusārī hoti. Iti kho, bhikkhave, indriyavemattatā phalavemattatā hoti,
phalavemattatā puggalavemattatā”ti.
§ Translated: “Bhikkhus, one who has fulfilled pañca indriya is an Arahant; one who has
developed them to lesser levels are Anāgāmī, Sakadāgāmi, Sotāpanna, Dhammānusāri, and
Sadhhānusāri. Bhikkhus, that is how different levels of indriya development determine the level
of progress”.
§ As we know, Dhammānusāri and Saddhānusāri are Sotāpanna Anugāmis.
Two Kinds of Sotāpanna Anugāmi
4. There are 10 suttas in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Okkantika Saṃyutta (SN 25)” that focus only on
the two kinds of Sotāpanna Anugāmis: Dhammānusāri and Saddhānusāri. These are important
because they emphasize the need to comprehend the anicca nature of the five aggregates
(pañcakkhandha).
“WebLink: suttacentral: Cakkhu Sutta (SN 25.1)” states: “Cakkhuṃ, bhikkhave, aniccaṃ
vipariṇāmi aññathābhāvi; sotaṃ aniccaṃ vipariṇāmi aññathābhāvi; sota..ghānaṃ.. jivhā .. kāyo ..
mano anicco vipariṇāmī aññathābhāvī. Yo, bhikkhave, ime dhamme evaṃ saddahati adhimuccati—
ayaṃ vuccati saddhānusārī, okkanto sammattaniyāmaṃ, sappurisabhūmiṃ okkanto, vītivatto
puthujjanabhūmiṃ; abhabbo taṃ kammaṃ kātuṃ, yaṃ kammaṃ katvā nirayaṃ vā tiracchānayoniṃ
vā pettivisayaṃ vā upapajjeyya; abhabbo ca tāva kālaṃ kātuṃ yāva na sotāpattiphalaṃ
sacchikaroti”.
§ Translated: “Bhikkhus, the eye is of anicca nature, bound to be destroyed, and is subject
to unexpected change during its existence” . The ear… nose… tongue… body… mind…
Bhikkhus, one who has conviction and belief that these phenomena are this way is called a
faith-follower (Saddhānusāri): one who has entered the Noble Path (sammattaniyāma), has
entered the plane of integrity (sappurisabhūmi), has transcended the plane of the run-of-the-
mill (puthujjanabhūmi). He is incapable of doing any deed by which he might be reborn in hell,
in the animal womb, or in the realm of hungry shades. He is incapable of passing away (from
this Ariya birth) until he has realized Sotāpatti phala.
§ Then the same verse is repeated for the Dhammānusāri with the following replacement for the
part marked in red above for the Saddhānusāri: “one who, after pondering with insight, has
accepted that these phenomena are this way is called a Dhamma-follower (Dhammānusāri ).
The rest belong to two categories: “Aṭṭha ariyapuggalā ariyā. Avasesā puggalā anariyā“.
Here are the 8 Noble Persons or ariyā (aṭṭha ariyapuggalā):
Tiṇṇaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ pahānāya paṭipanno puggalo sotāpattiphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno
(Sotāpanna Anugāmi). Yassa puggalassa tīṇi saṃyojanāni pahīnāni—ayaṃ vuccati puggalo
“sotāpanno”.
Kāmarāgabyāpādānaṃ tanubhāvāya paṭipanno puggalo sakadāgāmiphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno.
Yassa puggalassa kāmarāgabyāpādā tanubhūtā—ayaṃ vuccati puggalo “sakadāgāmī”.
We are going to tie up a series of posts that I have posted on gati and āsava with this post. See,
“Habits and Goals, and Character (Gati)”, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and
Cravings (Āsava)”, “Sansāric Habits, Character (Gati), Cravings (Āsava)”.
It is difficult to find English translations for some of the Pāli words that the Buddha used. But the key
is to grasp what is meant by those terms. Once the idea is grasped, that is all that matters; one could
even just use the Pāli term, and KNOW what is meant by it. It is like learning the meaning of the
word “dollar” or “car”. The exact same words are used in different languages, but everybody
understands what is meant by those words.
§ Anusaya is sometimes translated as “latent tendencies” and āsava as “mental fermentations”
and those are also correct and related to the above definitions.
1. Anusaya is normally translated as “latent tendencies” and āsava as “mental fermentations”. The
word “gati” is hardly mentioned in current texts, but is a key concept in Buddha Dhamma.
§ Āsava are indeed “mental fermentations” that lie deep down in us. That can be compared to
mud sitting at the bottom of a glass of water.
§ If that glass of water is disturbed with a straw, then some of that mud comes to the surface; that
is like anusaya bubbling up when we are disturbed by a strong sense event. When that happens
we display our real character/habits or gati (gathi).
2. As a given sentient being traverses the “saṃsāra” or the “rebirth process”, one makes transitions
from “bhava to bhava”, but within a given human (or animal) bhava, one may be born numerous
times as a human (or the same animal); see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“.
§ Through all these, the physical appearance will change drastically, especially when bhava is
changed. Thus when it makes a transition from being a deva to human, or from a human to a
dog, there is no resemblance of a “personality”.
§ However, our āsava remain with us through the saṃsāric journey. Of course they can change
during a given bhava. Most changes in āsava occur during human bhava, which is a topic we
will discuss later.
3. Āsava are four main types: ditthasava (diṭṭhi āsava), kamasava (kama āsava), bhavasava (bhava
āsava), and avijjasava (avijjā āsava).
§ Ditthasava are removed at the Sotāpanna stage, and kamasava removed at the Anāgāmī stage.
All āsava are removed at the Arahant stage.
§ What type of āsava “can be triggered to come up”, depends on the bhava one is in. In kama
loka, all āsava are “in play”, i.e., can be triggered by a sense event. In rūpa or arūpa brahma
loka, kamasava are not triggered. But unless one is an Anāgāmī, one still has kamasava, and
that will “come into play” when one reborn in kama loka.
§ Thus, one will not have kama anusaya bubbling up when one is in rūpa or arūpa realms.
Therefore, one will also not display any “kāma gati” that one have, while in rūpa/arūpa
realms.
4. This is another reason why the Buddha rejected both “self” and “no-self”. What character or any
other quality displayed in a given bhava could be very different from a another bhava. On the other
hand, the set of āsavas remain with one (even though changing all the time).
§ As mentioned above, āsava are four main types. Within each type, there can be an infinite
variety. For example, “kamasava” will include āsava for sense inputs coming through five
physical senses with an infinite variety.
§ “Anu” is food or defilements depending on the context. When a strong sense input comes, a
defilements that are “sleeping” or “lying dormant” can be released and can come to surface;
hence the name “anusaya“.
6. When an “āsava” is awakened by such a trigger then it is out as an “anusaya” and one will
displayed it through one’s actions. Then we also say, one has that type of cravings or “gati”.
§ For example, a calm person with hidden kamasava could be triggered by seeing a beautiful
woman Z matching “his gati”. He may get agitated upon seeing Z. But he may not be
“triggered” by seeing another woman, even if beautiful. This is a bit complex, but I am sure we
all know this to be true.
§ And if he keeps thinking about that woman, that āsava will ferment and grow (condense). This
is why it is sometimes translated as “mental fermentations”.
§ How much one gets “agitated” depends on one’s āsava and the strength of the sense input.
Rapes, for example, occur when both are strong.
7. Āsava can be compared to the active gun powder in a matchstick. The matchstick is harmless by
itself and will cause no fire. But the POTENTIAL to create a fire is there.
§ When it is rubbed against a rough surface (exposed to a sense input), the heat generated causes
gun powder to ignite and generate fire (anusaya coming up).
§ In the same way, a strong sense input can “awaken” and “fire-up” the sleeping anusaya.
§ One’s gati are cultivated by repeated use, and one’s anusaya is dependent on both āsava and
gati.
§ An Arahant has removed all types of āsava; thus no matter how strong a sense input comes in,
he/she will not be “triggered” by it. A matchstick with no active gun powder cannot be ignited,
no matter how hard a march strikes.
§ An Arahant may still have gati that are devoid of defilements, like one young Arahant had a
tendency to jump over mud puddles.
8. “Asaya” or “āsava” are the things we have liked for long, long times through uncountable lives in
the saṃsāra or the rebirth process. They are the deep-seated cravings we have for certain things.
§ “Immoral gati” due to āsavas is what makes the akuasala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda to take
place and create “bhava” for the sansāric process. These “immoral gati” are the “san gati” in
“thinnan san gati phasso“; see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
9. There are 7 types of anusaya: ditthanusaya (wrong views), vicikiccanusaya (tendency to do the
unwise), kamaragaanusaya (temptation for sense pleasures), patighanusaya (temptation for hatred),
bhvaraganusaya (craving for existence), mananusaya (sense of “me”) , and avijjanusaya (ignorance);
see, for example, “WebLink: suttacntral: Dutiya Anusaya Sutta (AN 7.12)“.
§ There are four broad categories of āsava: Ditthiasava, Kamasava, Bhavasava, and Avijjasava;
see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Āsava Sutta (AN 6.58)“.
10. Those āsava (asaya) can arise due to the anusaya.
§ Ditthānusaya and vicikiccānusaya arise from diṭṭhāsava.
§ Kāmarāganusaya and patighanusaya arise from kamāsava.
§ Bhvarāganusaya arise from bhavāsava.
§ Avijjānusaya and mānanusaya arise from avijjāsava.
§ One cannot REMOVE other three āsava until one removes ditthasava at the Sotāpanna stage.
11. Ditthasava is the craving or attachment to certain views. This is why sometimes it is hard to
accept or even consider other views. Again, there are views on numerous topics: religion, philosophy,
politics, and many combinations thereof.
§ Comprehension of anicca, dukkha, anatta automatically leads to getting rid of ditthasava.
§ Kamasava is craving for indulging in sense pleasures via the five physical senses. Within this
broad category. each person will have own set of cravings: some like music more than food,
and food more than reading, etc. The combinations are endless.
§ Bhavasava is a craving for existence. No matter where in the 31 realms one is born, one always
wants to live. Again there are many possibilities: most like the kamaloka with all five senses,
some who enjoy jhānic pleasures may prefer birth in an arupaloka with just the mind, etc.
§ Avijjasava is of course the root cause for all āsavas: not knowing the real nature of this world,
i.e., not comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta, and thus not comprehending the Four Noble
Truths.
12. These four āsavas are removed as one goes through the four stages of Nibbāna: Ditthasava is
removed at the Sotāpanna stage; Kamasava is lessened at the Sakadāgāmī stage and removed at the
Anāgāmī stage. The other two are reduced at each stage also, but removed only at the Arahant stage.
§ When asaya (āsava) are removed then of course anusaya are removed without a trace. One will
never be perturbed by anything; that is the ultimate state of “cooling” or Nibbāna.
13. It should be obvious by now how our character (gati) is defined by our ansaya and ultimately by
our āsava.
§ All three, āsava, anusaya, and gati are reinforced by each other. One has a certain character
because of the set of āsava and anusaya he/she has. On the other hand, unless the character is
changed WILLFULLY, none of the three is going to change.
§ And there is the fourth parameter of habits (called “gati purudu” in Sinhala), that lies at the
very bottom of the hierarchy. Some people talk rough, even when they are not mad. It is just a
habit.
§ Getting rid of bad habits and cultivating good habits is the first step in controlling one’s āsava
first and eventually getting rid of anusaya.
14. There are two key aspects in dealing with changing one’s habits:
§ One needs to be mindful the negative consequences of the bad habits and positive consequences
of good habits. This is satipaṭṭhāna.
§ And, one needs to WILLFULLY avoid the bad habits, and WILLFULLY engage in good
habits. This is ānāpāna.
§ One would actually be engaged in all those activities in satipatthāna/ānāpāna.
§ One can use the “search” box on top right to find relevant posts on satipaṭṭhāna and ānāpāna.
A practical, systematic way to do both is discussed in the “Living Dhamma” section.
15. This is the Path advocated by the Buddha. One could proceed a little on the Path and achieve a
“sense of peace”; one could go further to make the future lives better, or one could go all the way and
remove all four āsava thus attaining the Arahantship.
§ This is why “āsavakkhaya gnana” or the “way to remove āsava” is the critical knowledge that
the Buddha developed on attaining the Buddhahood. And that knowledge is in the Four Noble
Truths, and the way to achieve “āsavakkhaya” is the Noble Eightfold Path.
16. We are fortunate to live in a time when science is providing further evidence and ways to
understand this process. There is a series of posts in the ‘Dhamma and Science” section starting with,
“Truine Brain – How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits” and in the “Meditation”
section starting with, “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati)”.
17. Finally, where are these asaya are in storage? They are in the kamma bhava or our nama loka.
§ We have two “worlds”: one is the rūpa loka that we can see with our eyes.
§ The other is the nama loka that has energies below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage and
also nama gotta that do not have any energy but are just memory records. This nama loka is
accessed with the mana indriya; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!.
§ For those who need to dig deeper, this is discussed in “Our Two Worlds: Material and
Immaterial” and “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis“.
§ Saying that one has anusaya is also the same as saying that a viññāṇa has been established in
the kamma bhava, i.e., in the nama loka.
Next, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsava”, ……….
6.3.3 The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas
Revised November 19, 2018
1. The night the Buddha attained the Buddhahood, three special knowledges (tivijjā) arose in him,
namely:
· the special vision with which he was able to recollect innumerable former human existences
(pubbenivāsānussati ñāna).
· the special vision with which he was able to see beings passing away and being reborn according
to their kamma (cutupapāda ñāna); and
· the special vision with which he was able to destroy all cankers or defilements (āsavakkhaya
ñāna).
2. With the attainment of the āsavakkhaya ñāna, Sidharata Gotama became Buddha Gotama. This
was the final step in purifying the mind. This was the fruit of all his efforts, the path to attaining
Nibbāna for any being. Āsavakkhaya (āsava+khaya = cutting off all the āsavās or mental
fermentations). Thus Āsavakkhaya ñāna means the knowledge of cutting off āsavās and thus freeing
the mind from the ability to generate any defilement.
§ The term āsava comes from “āsravayata āva” (ආශ ්රවයට ආව) in Sinhala or Pali, which means
“came to association with”. Thus those habits (“gati“) that one keep associating with come
even closer. As one continues and feeds those habits through successive rebirths, they become
āsavās.
§ Āsava (in Pali, Sinahala, and Sanskrit) also means a distillation to get an extract or essence.
Some medicinal concoctions are fermented by keeping a mixture of ingredients underground
for many months.
§ Some habits (“gati“) we have cultivated (or fermented) over innumerable lives and that is why
they are hard to remove. Only through learning pure Dhamma and persistence in one’s efforts,
one can break such bad habits and thus eventually āsava. There are four types of āsava and
each may be associated with many bad habits.
3. The doctrine of Paṭicca Samuppāda, which is made up of twelve factors, namely, avijjā, saṅkhāra,
viññāna, nāmarūpa, saḷāyatana, phassa, vedanā, taṇhā, upādāna, bhava, jāti, jarā, marana became
clear to him. Going over this Doctrine of Paṭicca Samuppāda in forward and reverse order
repeatedly, he attained the Eightfold Noble Path, Ariya Magga, which is also known as Yathābhuta
Ñānadassana.
4. Paṭicca Samuppāda clarifies how ignorant beings accumulate defilements (and āsavās), and get
trapped in the round of rebirths (sansāra); these āsavās are fermented via repeated use of bad habits
(“gati“). And the Noble Eightfold Path is the way to remove those “gati” (and thus āsavās) from the
mind.
How Four Stages of Nibbāna are Connected to the Four Āsavas
1. We all have four major types of āsavās, even though there are uncountable minor varieties:
§ Diṭṭhāsava is the category that is due to all kinds of false beliefs (micchā diṭṭhi): for example, if
someone does not believe in rebirth, there may be cravings such as “I need to enjoy everything
before I die”.
§ Kāmāsava are associated with sense pleasures.
§ Bhavāsava is the craving for particular kind of existence, say as a human, deva, or a brahma;
any living being, in any realm, craves for existence.
§ Avijjāsava is all cravings that arise due to ignorance; ignorance of the Noble Truth of Suffering
(which is NOT merely suffering itself), and the other Noble Truths.
2. The four types of major āsavās are removed in a step-by-step process as one proceeds on the Path.
Even before the Sotāpanna stage, one will be reducing them, but those reductions do not hold to
future lives.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, all four types of āsavās that could trigger “apayagami”
actions are permanently removed from one’s mind, i.e., one will never be reborn in the four
lowest realms. Diṭṭhāsava (those due to wrong views) are completely removed.
§ At the Sakadāgāmi stage, kamasava and bhavāsava are reduced, and a Sakadāgāmi will be
born only as a deva or above in future lives; avijjāsava is also reduced.
§ Kāmāsava are completely removed at the Anāgāmi stage, and thus one will never be reborn in
the kamaloka (including the deva realm) again. Bhavāsava and avijjāsava are also reduced.
§ Bhavāsava and avijjāsava are removed without a trace at the Arahant stage. Thus āsavakkhaya
becomes complete.
Removal of āsavās start with the removal of bad habits and cultivating good habits; see, “Habits and
Goals“, “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)“, and, “Sansāric
Habits and Asavas“.
Is there a Connection Between Nibbāna and Kamma?
1. Many people have the misconception that, “one needs to deplete all kamma” to attain Nibbāna.
First of all, kamma (or saṅkhāra) are actions and that have been done (either in this life or in previous
lives); while some of the kammic power associated with them can be removed by metta bhāvanā, for
example, some kamma beeja (both good and bad) due to those kamma may still be there at the time of
the attainment of Nibbāna.
§ Even the Buddha had eleven kamma vipāka left that resulted in backaches and an ulcer-like
ailment close to Parinibbāna, among others. Because in order to get rid of kamma seeds
associated with a given kamma, the other being associated with that kamma seed need to be
able to receive the merits of metta bhāvanā, i.e., that being need to have a state of mind with
alobha, adosa, and amoha. But some of those beings may be trapped in the niraya for long
times and may not even have a moment of “relief” to receive such merits. I will discuss this in a
separate post, but the key idea is discussed in, “Transfer of Merits (Pattidana) – How Does it
Happen?“.
2. What really happens is that when āsavās are removed, the akusala-mula paṭicca samuppāda at
“vedanā paccayā taṇhā” step changes to “vedanā paccayā adhimokko” (in a kusala-mula paṭicca
samuppāda cycle) and there is no “upādāna paccayā bhavo” step in the cycle. Thus when the
Arahant dies, there is no “bhava” grasped by the mind, and thus there is no “jathi” or birth.
3. Thus an Arahant could have many unspent kamma beeja (both good and bad) left, but his/her mind
has lost the craving (āsava) to grasp any of them.
4. “Everything happens due to kamma” is a misconception. That is a Vedic concept, and is not in
Buddha Dhamma; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“. The āsavakkhaya ñāna
is the key to Nibbāna.
Next, “Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta so Important?“, ……..
6.3.4 Kaṇha (Dark) and Sukka (Bright) Kamma and Kammakkhaya
1. Kaṇha (dark), sukka (bright), and kammakkhayāya kamma are important terms discussed
briefly in the Kukkuravatika sutta (in niddesa version). In this post we will clarify these terms before
discussing that sutta in the second post published today, “Kukkuravatika Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 57)
– Kammakkhaya“. June 19, 2018: Siebe has sent me more suttas from Anguttara Nikāya that discuss
these terms: AN 4.232- AN 4.238. Thanks, Siebe!
§ Kaṇha and sukka kamma are nothing but pāpa and puñña kamma that were discussed in the
post, “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Puñña and Pāpa Kamma“.
§ Kaṇha means “dark” and refer to pāpa (or bad) kamma; sukka means “bright” or “white” and
refer to puñña (or good) kamma. The King of Gods is named “Sakka” because he is engaged in
sukka (puñña) kamma.
§ Both are different from kusala kamma.
§ This post is critical for understanding the concept of Nibbāna, so I am posting it at the “Seeking
Nibbāna” subsection.
2. The term kammakkhayāya kamma means the same as kusala kamma.
§ Kammakkhayāya kamma means “kamma that will lead to nullify or overcome the effects of
existing kamma vipāka“.It is important to note that we cannot take the literal meaning of
“kammakkhaya” as “removing kamma/kamma vipāka“.
§ Note the difference between the words kammakkhayāya and kammakkhaya.
§ Kammakkhaya stage is reached by purifying one’s mind by doing “Kammakkhayāya
kamma” or kamma that lead to kammakkhaya. These are the same as kusala kamma.
3. Once a kamma is done, its energy is going to be there for a long time, until naturally worn out. But
one can REMOVE the CONDITIONS under which that kamma can bring its vipāka. That is what is
meant by “kammakkhaya“.
§ For example, Angulimala killed 999 people. Those kamma created kamma beeja (energies that
could bring appropriate vipāka), and some of those energies may still be out there.
§ However, within a couple of weeks of meeting the Buddha, Angulimala attained the
Arahanthood. At that point, Ven. Angulimala’s mind became pure and would not EVER make
suitable conditions for those kamma vipāka to be “germinated”.
§ Just like seeds kept in a cool, dry place for millions of years will eventually becomes
“duds” (will no longer germinate) , Angulimala’s kamma beeja will one day become real duds.
§ Even though Ven. Angulimala’s kamma beeja were potent (active) when he died, they could
not be “germinated in his mind” at his death (i.e., at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment). Therefore,
they had become “effectively duds”. That is what is meant by “kammakkhaya“.
4. One’s mind is where various kamma beeja germinate. It is fair to say that ANY normal human will
have many kamma beeja suitable to bring rebirth in the apāyas from previous lives, if not from this
life. But just having those kamma vipāka does not necessarily mean they will bring vipāka.
§ The key here is that a purified mind (like Ven. Angulimala’s) will not grasp (upādāna) bad
kamma vipāka; of course his physical body was subjected to kamma vipāka until death; we
have discussed this in the discussion forum.
Let me take a different analogy to see why a purified
mind will not grasp kamma beeja. Visualize the mind
being a ball with a hook attached to it. The size of the hook
is proportional to how corrupt or defiled the mind is.
And we can think about kamma beeja as rings of various
sizes: rings of wide variety of sizes ranging from very tiny
to large (representing small to large kamma beeja that can
bring kamma vipāka).
§ We will keep coming back to this analogy in the future, so please make sure it is understood.
That will make it easier to comprehend many other concepts like āsava, anusaya, and gati.
5. Imagine a mind that is highly defiled (i.e., with a large hook attached to it), sweeping across an
area where there are a large number of kamma beeja of various magnitudes (rings of ranging from
small to large).
§ The hook is likely to pick up a ring of similar size: it cannot pickup small rings and it cannot
pickup too large rings.
§ In the same way, a highly-defiled mind will pickup a large kamma beeja and a less-defiled
mind will pickup only a smaller kamma beeja.
§ This is the same as saying that one’s mind will grasp a bhava (kamma beeja) that matches
one’s gati. One who has killed other humans will grasp a bhava in the hell (niraya)
corresponding to a “large ring”. It will not grasp a bhava in the human or deva realms, which
would be too small to be entangled in the large hook (highly defiled mind).
§ This is also what is meant by “changing CONDITIONS in one’s mind, in #3 above. A fully-
purified mind will have no “mental hooks”; that mind’s conditions have changed.
6. What happens when one follows the Noble Path of the Buddha, is that one’s “mental hook”
will get smaller in size, in this analogy.
§ One does this by doing kusala kamma. Kusala means removing defilements from one’s mind
(“ku” + “sala“, where “ku” is defilements and “sala” means “removal”).
§ Kusala kamma do not directly affect the existing bad or good kamma beeja. They only purify
the mind, and in the present analogy “wear out (or shrink) the mental hook” that can grasp
various good and bad kamma beeja rings.
§ Therefore, kammakkhaya means shrinking of the mental hook, in this analogy.
§ By the way, the biggest akusala kamma is micchā diṭṭhi.
7. Even before reaching the Sotāpanna Anugāmi stage, one’s mental hook may keep decreasing size,
but not that significantly. Of course, the kamma beeja or rings will remain almost the same.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, the mental hook will become drastically smaller in one
thought moment (at the Sotāpanna phala moment), just by comprehending the unfruitful and
dangerous nature of this world, in particular the dangers in the apāyas.
§ One’s avijjā will drop by orders of magnitude. This is a difficult point to understand for many.
But that can be experienced. One may not realize it at that time, but one will be able to see the
change within days or weeks by comparing one’s change in behavior.
§ The mind of a Sotāpanna will no longer be able to catch large rings corresponding potent
kamma beeja that can give rebirth in the apāyas.
§ This is done by getting to the first factor on the Noble Path — Sammā Diṭṭhi — by removing
the second layer of micchā diṭṭhi via comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa.
8. As one goes through the Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī stages, the mental hook will shrink in size and
when the Arahant phala is attained, the hook will disappear (avijjā is completely removed,
paññā (wisdom) will peak).
§ So, you can see that “kammakkhaya” does not mean getting rid of kamma beeja. One is just
reducing one’s āsava (or gati), and thus one’s mind will not grasp “bad bhava” corresponding
to large kamma beeja.
§ In the case of Ven. Angulimala, all his rings (including those large ones for killing people) were
there at the time of his death; it is just that his mind got purified and the “mental hook”
disappeared. His mind could not grasp any bhava in the 31 realms at his death.
§ Therefore, wearing out the “mental hook” is the same as reducing āsava and anusaya and also
getting rid of gati. As one keeps doing that, at one point the “mental hook” will disappear (and
lead to āsavakkhaya or Arahanthood).
9. Khammakkhayāya kamma (or kamma that lead to kammakkhaya) or kusala kamma do not
directly remove existing kamma beeja. They lead to a state of mind where existing kamma beeja are
UNABLE to bring vipāka. This is a VERY IMPORTANT point to understand. Please come back and
read this post as many times as needed to comprehend this point (and ask questions at the discussion
forum).
§ This is based on “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“.
§ As one keeps doing kusala kamma, one’s wisdom (paññā) will grow and will become
increasingly capable of comprehending the true nature of this world (the unsatisfactory nature)
or Tilakkhaṇa. That will lead to kammakkhaya in four stages of Nibbāna.
§ Kammakkhaya via kusala kamma will lead to the shrinking of the “mental
hook” (āsava/anusaya/gati) and therefore more and more kamma beeja (rings in our
analogy) will become “effectively duds”; see #4 and #5 above.
§ In terms of our analogy, even though the all the “rings” are still there, more and more of them
will not get “entangled” or “get hooked” to the shrinking “hook”.
10. Therefore, kammakkhaya happens at various levels.
§ Those that can bring rebirths in the Apāyas become “effectively duds” at the Sotāpanna stage.
At this stage one’s mind has clearly understood the dangers of akusala kamma that can lead to
rebirth in the apāyas. It is a “drastic change in one’s mindset”, a totally different “world view”.
§ Those that can bring rebirths in the human realm become”effectively duds” at the Sakadāgāmī
stage. One would have no doubt that “owning stuff that gives sense pleasures” is totally
unnecessary and dangerous.
§ Those that can bring rebirths anywhere in kāma loka become “effectively duds” at the Anāgāmī
stage. Now, one knows “deep inside” that sense pleasures ARE dangerous.
§ Those that can bring rebirths anywhere in 31 realms become “effectively duds” at the Arahant
stage.
11. Now let us see what is meant by puñña and pāpa kamma. In order to clarify what puñña
(sukka) kamma and pāpa (kaṇha) kamma, we need to understand how births in various realms arise.
§ There are six roots causes that give rise to bhava (and therefore jāti) in the 31 realms: lobha
(greed), dosa (hate), moha (ignorance) and alobha (non-greed), adosa (non-hate), amoha
(without ignorance). It is important to note that amoha does not mean paññā (wisdom); it just
means one is acting without being foolish or morally-blind.
§ When one acts with any combination of the three “bad roots” (lobha, dosa, moha), one is
doing pāpa kamma. They are also called kaṇha (“dark”) kamma. In these thoughts only
asobhana cetasika (bad or dark mental factors) can arise. They are also akusala kamma. These
lead to births in the apāyās (dugati).
§ When one acts with any combination of the three “good roots” (alobha, adosa, amoha),
one is doing puñña kamma. They are also called sukka (“bright”) kamma. In these thoughts
only sobhana cetasika (good or bright mental factors) can arise. These lead to births in the
“good realms (sugati), until one attains the Arahanthood.
§ A purified mind of an Arahant would have maximized sobhana cetasika, including paññā
(wisdom). Once that is done one would not grasp any bhava at the cuti-patsandhi moment,
since one has fully comprehended the futility of any existence in the 31 realms.
12. Now, puñña (sukka) kamma generate “good kamma beeja” that can give rise to rebirths in the
good realms (at and above the human realm). They also can bring “good vipāka” during a during
lifetime.
§ Pāpa (kaṇha) kamma generate “bad kamma beeja” that can give rise to rebirths in the bad
realms (those below the human realm, i.e., apāyas). They also can bring “bad vipāka” during a
during lifetime.
§ As we discussed in the post, “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Puñña and Pāpa Kamma“, there are
also kamma (or actions) that lead to both pāpa (kaṇha) and puñña (sukka) kamma beeja. The
Buddha called them “kanhasukka” kamma and their vipāka “kanhasukka vipāka” in the
Kukkuravatika sutta. Such “kanhasukka vipāka” give rise to both good and bad vipāka in some
realms (human, deva, and vinipata realms), see, “Kukkuravatika Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 57) –
Kammakkhaya“.
§ An example is when one prevents a snake from catching a frog. One is doing a puñña kamma
by saving frog’s life, but one also doing a pāpa kamma by preventing snake of its meal.
13. Another critical point to understand is that one will not be able to do any kusala kamma and to
wear out the “mental hook” when is born in the apāyas (beings in the 4 realms of the apāyas are
incapable of doing kusala kamma and are hardly capable of doing puñña kamma too).
§ This is why it is important to do puñña kamma and stay away from pāpa kamma. This is
critically important in order to be born in a good realm and to work towards Nibbāna.
§ It is important to contemplate and understand this. Even though puñña (sukka) kamma leads to
rebirth, that will be in a “good realm” where one can work towards Nibbāna, i.e., do kusala
kamma and wear out the “mental hook”.
§ Furthermore, puñña kamma set the necessary background (āyusa, vanna, sukha, bala, panna;
see, “Two Versions of 37 Factors of Enlightenment” ). Not all in the human realm have those:
if one is born extremely poor, unhealthy, etc., one will not have the right mindset to
comprehend Dhamma.
14. The above explanation is condensed (in niddesa version) in the Kukkuravatika Sutta (MN 57). A
patiniddesa or a detailed analysis is realize by the this post AND the accompanying post,
“Kukkuravatika Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 57) – Kammakkhaya“.
§ For explanation of niddesa and patiniddesa, see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Discussion of both posts of today at: “WebLink: Kusala/Akusala and Puñña/Pāpa Kamma“.
1. Samyojana (or sanyojana) is translated to English as “fetters”, which is not a bad translation. Even
though “fetter” is not a commonly used word, it means “a chain that is used to restrain or bind
someone”.
§ Dasa samyojana are the ten “chains” or “bonds” that bind one to the rebirth process and force
one to go through unimaginable suffering in the long run.
2. samyojana comes from the three roots (“san“, “yo“, and “ja” respectively meaning “defilements”,
“bind”, and “birth”). It can be pronounced either as “sanyojanā” or — as is the common practice with
many words involving “san” –, as “samyojana”.
§ Therefore, samyojana means “bonds that bind one to “san” and thus keep one in the rebirth
process; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ When one breaks these bonds in a systematic way — in three steps and four stages — at each
stage, one makes irreversible progress to Nibbāna (release from all suffering).
§ For explanation of many words with the root “san“, see, “List of “San” Words and Other Pāli
Roots“.
3. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Saṃyojana Sutta (SN 41.1)” clearly states that there is “san” or
“craving (chanda raga)” MUST be involved in samyojana: “Evameva kho, bhante, na cakkhu
rūpānaṃ saṃyojanaṃ, na rūpā cakkhussa saṃyojanaṃ; yañca tattha tadubhayaṃ paṭicca uppajjati
chandarāgo taṃ tattha saṃyojanaṃ..”.
Translated: “samyojana arise not due to eyes just seeing objects (rūpa) , but due to craving that
arises due that seeing..”.
4. Many people do not realize that there is an important step BEFORE one can start tackling dasa
samyojana. This step must be taken to enter the Noble Path and start breaking those bonds to the
rebirth process. This is to get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi (wrong views) about the world
that we live in; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage”.
§ This important pre-requisite or the pre-condition to “enter the Noble Path” was specifically
discussed by the Buddha in the “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)”.
§ The reason is that unless one believes in the laws of kamma and the rebirth process, there is no
way one can start working towards Nibbāna (which is to be released from the suffering-filled
rebirth process).
§ Striving to attain Nibbāna without belief in the rebirth process is a useless thing, because by
definition, Nibbāna is the release from the rebirth process. Most people confuse Nibbāna with a
temporary relief from “day-to-day stresses of life”.
§ Nibbāna can be described in simple or deeper levels; see, “Nibbāna“.
5. Buddha Dhamma is different from any other religion or philosophy. One first needs to understand
the message of the Buddha before one can start on the Path prescribed by him. Many people waste
time blindly pursuing things that have nothing to do with the Noble Path to Nibbāna.
§ In order to understand the key message of the Buddha, one needs to understand that our world
is much more complex than seen by our eyes. One needs to ‘see’ with wisdom. This wisdom or
“paññā” can be cultivated only in steps, with an increasingly pure mind (i.e., with less greed,
hate, and ignorance of the true nature of this world).
§ In the early stage, when one is trying to get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi, one may need
to stay away from dasa akusala with determination, i.e., even going to the extent of sticking to
a set of rituals (saying I will not break the five precepts).
§ However, when one becomes free of those basic immoral acts and speech (pāpa kamma), which
are named the “big eight” in “3. The Second Level – Key to Purify the Mind“, in the Meditation
section, one should be able to get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi mentioned above.
§ At this stage, one’s mind is purified enough (i.e., paññā has grown enough) to start grasping the
Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta) to some extent. Of course it is necessary to grasp the
correct interpretations: “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“.
6. The first step in the Noble Eightfold Path is “Sammā Diṭṭhi“, which is not “something to be done”.
It is a vision or a “new way of looking at how our world works”.
§ This new way of looking at the world is through the world view that emerges from what is
embedded in anicca, dukkkha, anatta. This is how one breaks the first three samyojana of
sakkāya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, and sīlabbata parāmasa.
7. One has to break those bonds in one’s own mind. One gains sammā diṭṭhi — right view to become
free of ‘san’ — by comprehending the true nature of this world of 31 realms.
Anicca – that nothing in this world can bring a permanent happiness in the long run.
Dukkha – despite our struggles, we will be subjected to much more suffering than pleasures if we
remain in the rebirth process.
Anatta – therefore, one is truly helpless in this struggle to attain “something of essence in this world”.
That is just an illusion.
8. When one values a certain object, one can spend extraordinary amount of effort to get it. A normal
human has many things in this world (a beautiful/handsome partner, nice house, nice car, etc) that are
very valuable.
§ Many people are willing to commit murder, robbery, lying, cheating, etc to get those. Then they
get into trouble in two ways: If the society catches them, they will pay consequences like going
to jail. Even if they manage to avoid “getting caught”, there is no way to avoid kamma vipāka,
i.e., those actions will bring much harsher punishments in this life or in future lives.
§ By comprehending the 10 types micchā diṭṭhi, one will be able to see that one will have to pay
for immoral actions without exception, and one that depending on the severity of the actions,
one may suffer for millions of years in the four lower realms (apāyas). This very first step of
getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi will be quite beneficial in preventing one from
getting into trouble in the future.
9. However, grasping the Tilakkhaṇa will lead to getting rid of even stronger type of wrong vision or
micchā diṭṭhi about this world, i.e., that there is NOTHING in this world that will bring a level of
permanent happiness.
§ When one first starts comprehending anicca, and realizes a glimpse of this truth, one may still
not be quite certain of the truth of that. But one will compelled to believe that “it is not
WORTH to commit those strong bad kamma that COULD lead to rebirth in the apāyas (strong
greed and strong hate).
§ At this beginning stage on the Noble Path, one could see the dangers in being born in the
apāyas and one’s mind will AUTOMATICALLY start rejecting such actions. This does not
happen by sheer will power, but it will programmed into the mind. In the Abhidhamma
language, the “votttapana cittā” in a citta vīthi will make that decision in a billionth of a
second.
10. So, it is quite important to understand that getting rid of the first three samyojana involves
NOTHING ELSE but just comprehending a bit about the true nature of this world, the anicca
nature.
§ In other words, at this stage one will lose a significant fraction of HOW MUCH VALUE one
will places on ANY MATERIAL THING in this world. There is NOTHING in this world that
is worth killing another human being via pre-planning with hate in the mind, for example.
§ At this stage, one is a Sotāpanna Anugāmi, and one will get to the Sotāpanna stage without
doubt. One has become one of the eight types of Nobles (Ariyās); see, “Sotāpanna Magga
Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna”.
11. Therefore, getting release from rebirth in the apāyas depends on grasping the dangers of certain
highly-immoral actions that are not worth doing because NOTHING in this world can be that
valuable. Put in another way, nothing in this world is worth taking a risk of paying back with a rebirth
in the apāyas.
§ The Buddha characterized dukkha as “dukkhan bhayattena“, i.e., “dukha is another name for
danger”. This dukha is not the suffering that one is feeling at the moment (which has arisen due
to a past kamma), but this dukha is the one that can be stopped from arising by
comprehending the dangers of such actions.
12. The next step towards Nibbāna involves getting rid of two more bonds or samyojana, i.e., kāma
rāga and paṭigha. This is done in two stages: Sakadāgāmī stage and the Anāgāmī stage.
§ In a way, these two bonds are harder to break because all through this beginning-less rebirth
process we have spent probably 99% of the time in the kāma loka. We are so attached to sense
pleasures (kāma rāga), that it is almost impossible for a normal human to grasp the anicca
nature in kāma loka.
§ As we discussed above, it is easier to see the bad consequences of highly-immoral actions that
could lead to rebirth in the apāyas. And it is also easier to see the dangers of birth in the apāyas
(the Buddha has described such unimaginable suffering in many suttas; see, for example,
“WebLink: suttacentral: devaduta Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya 130)“.
13. It is harder for a normal human to see that those things that we value so highly are not only
worthless, but are in fact can lead to suffering and are thus dangerous (even though not to the extent
of the dangers of apāyagāmi actions).
§ Most “moral people” believe that if one lives a moral life without harming others, then one will
not be subjected to suffering in the future. Even if one had comprehended Tilakkhaṇa to a
level of a Sotāpanna, that could still be the impression.
§ This is why Buddha’s foremost female lay disciple Visākā attained the Sotāpanna stage at age 7
and went on to marry and have 22 children. If Visāka thought that the kāma loka was also filled
with suffering, she would not have done that.
14. Therefore, getting rid of the samyojana of kāma rāga (attachment to sensual pleasures) — and
thus to be freed also from paṭigha samyojana — is a much harder thing. This is why it took me over
three years to truly START comprehending the worthlessness of sense pleasures AND the dangers of
being attracted to sense pleasures.
§ Even though I knew the criteria for one to become an Anāgāmī, I did not realize that I would
actually have to “see the dangers” in staying in the kāma loka, in order to strive for it.
§ I had been doing meditation on getting rid of kāma rāga all these years, but the mind has
grasped the urgency to do that only in the last month.
§ I had written about the importance of removing kāma rāga in the following section: “Āsvada
(Mind-Made Pleasures), Ādeenava (Bad Outcomes), Nissarana (Relinquish)“. These posts were
written before October, 2015.
15. So, I had known the “theory” part of it. But my paññā or wisdom had not been cultivated enough
to see the possible dangers of sense pleasures!
§ It needed a trigger for my mind to finally realize the “worthlessness” and “dangers” of
REMAINING in the kāma loka. I will write more about how it actually got triggered, but I am
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
720 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
still working on trying to see the dangers of sense pleasures and thereby making a convincing
case that all we perceive as “pleasures” in the human and deva realms are in fact CAUSES for
future suffering.
§ The point here is that one needs to keep on striving as long as it takes for the mind to come to a
stage to be “triggered” by some event (mine was not a major event). As long as one keeps
striving, it is bound to happen. It came as a shock to me. But I will discuss those details in
another post (I am not there yet anyway).
16. By the way, it is becoming more clear to me about the difference between magga phala and
jhāna. While jhāna can help, jhāna are not NEEDED to attain magga phala. It is sīla, samādhi,
paññā, and NOT sīla, jhāna, paññā. I will write about this in detail, but I see that many people seem
to get discouraged that they cannot get to jhāna.
§ There may be people: with magga phala and without any type of jhāna; with anāriya jhāna and
without magga phala; and also with anāriya jhāna and with magga phala. Those with Ariya
jhāna MUST be at least an Anāgāmī, i.e., one who has REMOVED kāma rāga completely.
§ The problem is that it is virtually impossible to distinguish between Ariya and anāriya jhāna.
One thing is quite clear: One cannot attain Ariya first jhāna without REMOVING (ucceda
pahāna, not just vishakambana pahāna) of kāma rāga, i.e., kāma anusaya must be removed,
not just suppressed.
§ But the “jhānic effect” is the same in both cases. The body and the mind have very similar
sensations.
§ If a Sotāpanna can get into the first Ariya jhāna, then he/she will never be born in the human
world again; but we know that a Sotāpanna can be reborn in the human realm; thus a
Sotāpanna would not have the first Ariya jhāna. Whatever jhānas that I had were not Ariya
jhāna. I have started revising my old posts on jhāna. Please let me know any post that you see
need revision.
§ I was slowly coming to this conclusion over time; see, “Difference Between jhāna and Stages
of Nibbāna“. Information in that fairly recent post is correct. I had forgotten to update the old
posts. Another point is that it is Sammā Samādhi (not necessarily jhāna) that takes one to
Sammā Ñāṇa and Sammā Vimukti to becomes an Arahant in the Noble Path.
17. Getting back to the main discussion: Once one overcomes those two samyojana of kāma rāga and
paṭigha, one will be free of rebirths anywhere in the kāma loka (lowest 11 realms including the
human and deva realms).
§ It is only then one can be said to be become healthy (not subject to illnesses) and also will be
free of the three sets of senses of smell, taste, and body touches. Actually, it is only the human
bodies that are subject to illnesses and that is first overcome at the Sakadāgāmī stage.
§ When one attains the Sakadāgāmī stage by REDUCING kāma rāga and paṭigha, one will be
forever released from the human realm and one could be born only in deva realms of the kāma
loka. At this stage, one would have lost the desire to OWN objects that bring sense pleasures
(vatthu kāma), but has not yet lost the URGE TO ENJOY sense pleasures.
§ As one progresses more, the two bonds of kāma rāga and paṭigha will be completely broken
and one will attain the Anāgāmī stage, never to be born in any realm of kāma loka.
18. An Anāgāmī would be still bound to the rebirth process via five more bonds or samyojana:
rūpa rāga, arūpa rāga, māna, uddhacca, avijjā.
§ The first five types of samyojana are called orambhāgiya–samyojana or “lower bonds”. The
higher five are called uddhambhāgiya-samyojana or “higher bonds”.
§ If a person has removed the first seven samyojana but still has the last three of māna,
uddhacca, avijjā, then if one dies at that time, one’s mental body (gandhabba) would come out
of the dead body and will be in that state until the kammic energy for the human bhava is
exhausted. Parinibbāna will happen at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment since one has lost upādāna
for all 31 realms and thus cannot be born anywhere. So, the gandhabba would be in the antara
Parinibbāna state during that time. This is what is presumed to have happened to Waharaka
Thero; see, “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
§ As one progresses to higher stages, it becomes harder to remove the higher bonds (from the
perspective of lower levels). As we saw, it is easier for a normal human to see the dangers
of the apāyas, but harder to see the dangers of kāma loka. I cannot even begin to imagine the
dangers of rūpa and arūpa loka. One has to proceed step-by-step.
§ When an Anāgāmī removes rūpa rāga, he/she would be never again born in any realm in the
rūpa loka. Similarly, removing the samyojana of arūpa rāga would make one free of birth in
the arūpa loka.
19. Once the Buddha saw that a Bhikkhu had started “taking it easy” after attaining the Anāgāmī
stage, and asked him why he was not striving hard as he used to. The Bhikkhu replied that he had
attained the Anāgāmī stage and thus thought that he was out of real danger.
§ The Buddha asked him to consider the following: If one had touched feces and had just wiped it
off, one may not see it anymore. But wouldn’t that remaining traces still smell bad? The
Bhikkhu realized that one will not be really free of ALL suffering until one is released fully
from all 31 realms. It is harder to see the dangers at higher levels, until something happens to
make one aware of such “hard-to-see” dangers.
§ What I learned from my experience is that even though I was not fully focused on attaining the
next stage, I had been conditioning my mind through meditation. So, when the trigger came, my
mind “got triggered”; I saw the dangers in the kāma loka virtually “in a flash”. Just several
months before, last December, I had an even stronger life event (severe back pains), but that did
not act “as a trigger” presumably because my mind was not purified enough at that time (i.e.,
my paññā had not been cultivated enough).
§ Whichever stage we are “stuck at”, we should continue the effort without getting
complacent. Results will follow (possibly triggered by some unexpected event).
§ Sometimes such triggers lead to moments of “insights” (“ahā” moments) directly leading to
magga phala. There are many such examples in the Tipiṭaka.
20. Finally, the ten samyojana are removed via different methods:
§ Sakkāya diṭṭhi, vicikiccā, and sīlabbata parāmasa are removed via “correct vision” or “correct
understanding” that happens when one is listening to a desanā by an Ariya or a Noble Person.
§ Kama raga and paṭigha are removed via meditation.
§ The five higher samyojana are removed with wisdom (pannā).
6.3.6 The Cooling Down Process (Nibbāna) – How the Root Causes are
Removed
1. One’s material world exists because of the six roots causes: lobha, dosa, moha, alobha, adosa,
amoha. Even though we may have bouts of happiness, we suffer much more than imaginable in the
rebirth process because of these six causes.
§ If there are six root causes, why did the Buddha say, “rāgakkhayo Nibbanan, dosakkhayo
Nibbanan, Mohakkhayo Nibbanan”? i.e., why are there only three causes to be removed to
attain Nibbāna? (By the way, lobha is a stronger form of rāga, thus rāgakkhaya means
removing lobha).
§ In fact, one needs to cultivate alobha, adosa, amoha in order to remove lobha, dosa, moha.
§ As lobha, dosa, moha are removed gradually, the wisdom (paññā) gained in that process
automatically reduces alobha, adosa, amoha as needed. An Arahant has removed all six;
alobha, adosa, amoha must be cultivated all the way up to the Arahant stage.
2. Lobha is the extreme of greed.(“lo” + “bha” where “lo” is for the lokaya or world and “bha” is for
“bihiveema” (arise or establish) is the main reason how the material world is created and sustained
with greed.
§ Because of lobha, kamachanda (one of the five hindrances) arises. It is said that “one loses
one’s mind” when one acts with kamachanda (kāmachanda = “kāma” + “ichcha” +”anda”
where “ichcha” is liking and “anda” is becomes blind; thus kamachanda means blinded by
attachment to sense pleasures).
§ When one blinded by kamachanda and when obstacles arise in the way, one develops dosa or
dvesa (“dvi”+”vesa” or second manifestation of greed; see, “Pāli Glossary (A-K) and Pāli
Glossary (L-Z)” for the pronunciation key), i.e., hate for whatever gets in one’s way.
§ And one has lobha because one cannot see the truth about this world, i.e., because one has
moha: Moha comes from “muva” + “hā” or literally “closed mouth”. Here what is meant is that
if there is a vessel and if its mouth or opening is closed, then one cannot see what is inside.
Thus when one has moha, one is ignorant about the true nature of this world, and thus acts
blindly and foolishly, just based on the outward appearances.
3. One who has not heard about the Buddha’s world view is likely to act with moha and thus in turn
has both lobha and dosa.
§ However, many people do not have strong versions of lobha, dosa, moha because they may
have been exposed to Buddha Dhamma in recent previous lives and thus may be carrying over
such habits (gathi) compatible with alobha, adosa, amoha. In fact, ANYONE is likely to have
been exposed to Buddha Dhamma somewhere, sometime in the deep past; but the more time lag
there is, one is likely to lose those qualities.
§ In any case, it is clear that if and when one has kamachanda, one gets blinded by the urge to get
possession of whatever the sense object in question at the time. We all have had instances of
kamachanda taking over; anyone can possibly remember instances where “the ability to reason
out” got lost, at least for a brief time. It is good to contemplate on such a past situation and
verify this fact.
4. Long-lasting hateful situations (dosa) arise because of kamachanda. Again one can go back and
remember such situations. This is why dosa (or dvesa) is called the second manifestation of greed. At
the extreme, dosa brings out the second of the five hindrances, vyāpāda. This word comes from
“vaya”+”pada”, where “vaya” means decline and “pada” means walk towards; thus vyāpāda means
one is on a (morally) declining path.
§ When one gets extremely angry, one again loses control and this could be even worse than
kamachanda; it is possible for one to kill another human being in a moment of rage. And when
one habitually gets angry, one could be in a state of vyāpāda for longer times, and that could
become “normal” state of affairs if one is not stopped, i.e., become a “gathi“. We can see
people get into the “vyāpāda mode” during (political) debates on television, or during
arguments.
§ All five hindrances arise because of not seeing the futility of craving or hating. This “getting
attached to this world” via greed and hate is called taṇhā; see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via
Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“
5. Avijjā (ignorance) and taṇhā feed off each other, but it is avijjā that one needs to tackle first. This
is because unless one’s mind sees the dangers hidden behind taṇhā, it is not possible to reduce taṇhā.
§ When one starts learning Dhamma one begins to understand the nature of the wider world of 31
realms where beings move around birth to birth, how beings suffer mostly in the lowest four
realms, that all actions have consequences, and why it does not make sense in the long run to
act immorally to satisfy one’s immediate urges (the concept of anicca); see, “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“, and follow-up posts.
§ When one truly understands anicca, one’s avijjā starts to reduce first from the strong moha
stage which contributes to vicikicchā (acting without mindfulness); this in turn reduces greed
and hate.
§ Most people make the mistake of trying to get rid of greed and hate (via breath meditation), and
that is NOT POSSIBLE; one needs to engage in the correct version of “ānāpāna” meditation;
see, “6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)“.
§ As long as one has a wrong world view and does not see the danger in having thoughts of
excess greed and hate, it is not possible to FORCIBLY get rid of greed and hate; see,
“Difference Between Giving Up Valuables and Losing Interest in Worthless”.
§ This is why Sammā Diṭṭhi or the correct world view comes first in the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ When one does the breath meditation, what one is doing is to forcibly SUPPRESS kamachanda
and vyāpāda, and other hindrances.
6. When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one’s lobha is reduced to the kāma rāga level and one’s
dosa reduced to the paṭigha level PERMANENTLY; The fifth hindrance of vicikicchā is removed,
and the other two hindrances reduced. Patigha is a lower strength of vyāpāda: “pati” + “gha” means
bonding via friction or dislike; thus paṭigha is included in taṇhā.
§ One can see now why a Sotāpanna is incapable of doing extremely immoral acts that can result
in a birth in the four lowest realms (apāyas); one has removed vicikicchā hindrance
permanently, and one always acts with mindfulness. This higher level of Sammā Diṭṭhi or the
correct world view is deeply ingrained in his/her mind, and even in a future birth that will not
change. But one is still capable of acting with greed and hate to a certain extent.
7. When one attains the next level of Nibbāna, the Sakadāgāmī level, one permanently REDUCES
kāma rāga and paṭigha.Because of this advancement, one will never be reborn in a realm where the
physical body can be subjected to ailments, diseases, and old age, i.e., one will be reborn above the
human realm, which is the fifth realm.
8. At the Anāgāmī stage kāma rāga and paṭigha are permanently REMOVED. Thus by the Anāgāmī
stage, one has completely removed any form of dosa, the second root cause; one does not get angry
or hateful under any circumstance, and the dosa cetasika is permanently removed. Since kāma rāga is
also removed now one has no desire to be born in any realm in the kāma loka, including the deva
worlds.
§ Thus an Anāgāmī has only rūpa rāga and arūpa rāga. This is mainly due to the desire of an
Anāgāmī to listen (and read) and contemplate on Dhamma concepts; there is no desire left for
sense pleasures. Thus the lobha cetasika is reduced to a very low level.
§ As for the moha cetasika, only a low strength remains as avijjā.
9. Thus out of the ten sanyojana or sanyoga (“san” + “yoga” or bound via “san”), satkaya diṭṭhi,
vicikicchā, silabbata paramasa (all due to strong avijjā) are removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ This is an important point: One just needs to comprehend the true nature of this world via
understanding anicca, dukkha, anatta in order to become a Sotāpanna.
§ Just with this understanding, one removes kamachanda , vyāpāda, and vicikicchā. This is why a
Sotāpanna is said to be “one with the vision” or “dassanena sampanno“.
§ Once the Buddha took a bit of soil on his fingernail and told the bhikkhus, “if all the soil in this
Earth can be compared to the defilements one needs to get rid of, a Sotāpanna has left in
him/her only an amount compared to this bit of soil on my fingernail”.
§ This may sound astounding to some. But it is critical to understand that most heinous immoral
acts are done because of one not having Sammā Diṭṭhi at least to a significant level.
§ Of the remaining sanyojana (sanyoga), kāma rāga and paṭigha are reduced at the Sakadāgāmī
stage, and at the Anāgāmī stage they are removed. The rest of the sanyoga (rūpa rāga, arūpa
rāga, māna, uddhacca, and avijjā) are removed at the Arahant stage.
10. In the kāma loka, we experience a form of olarika sukha (or primitive form of coarse sensations),
where sense faculties and corresponding sense objects are dense. As attachment to pleasures from
“dense matter” decreases, rebirth in the “denser worlds” is progressively eliminated (one exception is
the peta realm where the bodies are fine, but that is done to impart an enhanced mental suffering).
§ At the Sotāpanna stage one is permanently released from the coarse forms of suffering in the
lowest four realms. After the Sakadāgāmī stage, rebirths do not occur even in the human realm
where the relatively dense bodies still are subjected to physical pains and diseases. An Anāgāmī
is born only in the suddhavasa rūpa loka, where there are only fine bodies with vision, hearing,
and mind only. An Arahant will never be reborn anywhere in the 31 realms which have “some
connection to matter”; see, “What Are Rūpa? (Relation to Nibbāna)“.
§ Thus at the passing away of an Arahant, the mind is released from any attachment to the
material world consisting of the 31 realms; no more suffering from physical pains, mental
pains, or death. One has attained the state of amaraneeya (no death).
11. Another way to analyze the steps to Nibbāna is to look at how the 12 akusala citta are removed
stage by stage; see, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“.
12. Therefore, the four stages of Nibbāna can be characterized via different ways, in terms of
hindrances, sanyoga (or samyojana), “density of matter”, akusala citta, and many other ways. They
are all inter-consistent.
13. Even before the Sotāpanna stage one can start feeling the nirāmisa sukha; see, “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?“, and “Nirāmisa Sukha“.
§ Nirāmisa sukha can increase considerably if one can get to the Ariya jhānas.
§ It is not necessary to attain Ariya jhānas to become a Sotāpanna, but Ariya jhānas can be
attained only if one is already a Sotāpanna; see, “How does one know whether the Sotāpanna
Stage is Reached?“ (this became clear to me only recently and I have verified it in a desanā
from the Thero).
§ Thus, if one can get to Ariya jhānas one can confirm the attainment of the Sotāpanna stage.
And it is possible to distinguish Ariya jhānas from Anariya jhānas easily since Ariya jhānas are
immune to external influences or even forced defiled thoughts; see, “11. Magga Phala and
Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
6.3.7 Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anattā so
Important?
The correct meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta are explained under the top menu “Key Dhamma
Concepts”.
1. Anicca, dukkha, anatta describe the true nature of “this world” of 31 realms; see, “The Grand
Unified Theory of Dhamma“. Nowhere in the 31 realms can one maintain anything to one’s
satisfaction over the long term (anicca); thus one gets depressed, unfulfilled, and distraught (suffering
or dukkha is the net result). Thus one becomes helpless (anatta).
2. A good analogy is someone attempting to fill a leaky vessel at home by carrying water to it from a
nearby river. He makes a trip back from the river, fills the vessel and is glad to see that it got filled
halfway. But soon enough he sees that water is running out and thus needs to make another trip to the
river to bring more water.
§ If he spent a bit of time examining the vessel, he would have discovered the leak, and could
have fixed it. We are too much involved in the struggle to maintain an illusory happiness, and
we do not take enough time to contemplate whether it makes sense to struggle against a system
that is INHERENTLY unsuitable to provide lasting happiness.
3. Before the retirement, I was basically working seven days a week. I had deadlines to meet and
responsibilities to fulfil and there was no time to even think whether I should take some time off and
contemplate the sensibility of such a hectic life.
§ Whatever vacation time that I had, I wanted to plan a “relaxing vacation”. But I did not realize
that I was spending more time planning the vacation and then spent whatever the energy that I
had on sightseeing etc. When I got back from the vacation, I was exhausted from the trip itself.
The early retirement decision was the best decision that I ever made in my life.
4. If this existence is inherently flawed in the sense that it is not capable of sustaining stability at all,
then all the struggles that we make are in vain. The Buddha discovered that everything in “this
world”undergoes change (see “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma”). It is INHERENTLY
impossible to achieve a lasting happiness.
§ Now the question is how do we know whether this axiom in Dhamma is correct? This is where
it takes a bit of time to look at the evidence. I have done a lot of work within the past several
years and hopefully this website will help you cut down on that research.
§ Actually scientists also now acknowledge that the universe is “running down”, and we need to
constantly spend energy to keep chaos and instability out of the way to maintain some sort of
stability (in Buddha Dhamma this is called “saṅkhāra dukkha“); see, “Second Law of
Thermodynamics is Part of Anicca!“.
5. After looking at the evidence, if one decides to spend a bit more time to carefully examine the
three characteristics (anicca, dukkha, anatta), one may see that there is some truth to it. This will set
one off on the Dhamma Path.
§ If there is nothing substantial or long lasting to be had by harming other living beings, stealing
from them, lying to them, indulging in excess sense pleasures, or not being intoxicated with
power, money or position, one’s life will automatically change for the better.
§ The five precepts or eight precepts are NOT to be just mechanically followed. The mind needs
to SEE the benefit of following them.
6. This is why one MUST spend some time examining the evidence for the validity of Buddha
Dhamma. The first stage of Nibbāna, Sotāpanna stage, is attained just with the clear understanding of
the true nature of “this world”, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ When one realizes the futility of the struggle for long lasting happiness in a world that is
inherently not capable of providing it, one will automatically start moving away from clinging
to “things in this world”. For example, one will say to oneself, “what is the point of stealing this
from another person? What long lasting happiness can be gained from it? Rather my mind will
be in an agitated state if I do that”.
§ There is no need to force oneself to obey the precepts. Moral behavior (sīla) will automatically
follow the true understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta. Then, when one starts feeling a bit of
nirāmisa sukha, there is no turning back, because one can see for oneself the benefits of a moral
life.
7. Thus Sammā Diṭṭhi (san + ma + diṭṭhi = vision to get rid of defilements) is none other than the true
comprehension of the three characteristics: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ When one gains a bit of Sammā Diṭṭhi (vision), it will try to prevent one from having defiled
thoughts (Sammā Sankappa), uttering false speech (Sammā Vaca), doing wrong things (Sammā
Kammanta), pursuing wrong lifestyles (Sammā Ajiva). One will also make efforts (Sammā
Vayama) to be on the Path, which will lead to be constantly be mindful (Sammā Sati), thus
leading to Sammā Samādhi (peaceful and focused state of mind).
§ But the important distinction between, say “good speech” and sammā vaca must be understood
in the context of anicca, dukkha, anatta. One abstains from “wrong speech” not merely
because one does not want to face bad consequences; one abstains from it because one can
ALSO see the futility in it. Same holds for all eight. This is worth a lot of contemplation.
§ This is why the Buddha said, “Dhammo ha ve rakkati dhammacari”, or, “once one sees the
Dhamma, Dhamma will guide, protect, and direct”.
§ Thus, gaining Sammā Diṭṭhi via contemplating on anicca, dukkha, anatta will automatically
direct one on the Noble Eightfold Path. This is why removing micchā diṭṭhi via true
understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta is so important.
7. When one proceeds in this manner, one will attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, as these three
basic concepts take hold in the mind. At that point, the mind will automatically reject doing things
that will result in rebirth in lower four realms.
§ Those are the four greed-based cittas that arise due to micchā diṭṭhi (wrong vision), and the
delusion-based citta that arises due to defiled viññāṇa (vicikicchā). This is why a Sotāpanna is
prevented from a rebirth in the lower four realms forever; see, “Akusala Citta- How a
Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“.
8. When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one may still have greed, hate, and delusion left in him/her.
But a Sotāpanna KNOWS about them, and KNOWS how to get rid of them. Then it is just a matter of
time before getting rid of those defilements and attaining the other three stages, culminating in
ultimate peace and permanent happiness, Nibbāna.
Next, “The Sotāpanna Stage“, …….
6.3.8 How to Cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path starting with Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta
Anicca, dukkha, anatta describe the true nature of this world with 31 realms. Thus one needs to
comprehend these “three characteristics of nature” in order to “see” the path to Nibbāna before
starting to follow it.
1. Before one starts on a journey one needs to decide why one should take the journey, exactly where
one is going to, and the correct path towards that destination. Thus it is worthwhile to examine why
the Buddha said our goal should be to move away from this world towards Nibbāna, why he said that,
why one should believe that to be true, and what the correct path towards that goal is. The Buddha
himself recommended that approach:
§ One starts on the Noble Eightfold Path with Sammā Diṭṭhi, which means the needed “vision” on
why, what to expect at the end , and an idea about the path to achieve it.
§ Out of the twelve akusala cittas, five are permanently removed when one attains the Sotāpanna
stage: the four greedy cittas that arise with wrong view (“diṭṭhi sahagatha“), and the delusion
citta based on vicikicchā. All five of these cittas arise because one does not know the true
nature of the world; all kamma that lead one to rebirth in the apāyas are done with these five
cittas. Thus when they are removed by partially completing Sammā Diṭṭhi at the Sotāpanna
stage, one is permanently prevented from accumulating kamma that destines one to a rebirth in
the lowest four realms (apāyas).
§ Furthermore, any such apayagami kamma seeds previously accumulated are prevented from
proving a potent enough nimitta at the moment of death; thus birth in the apāyas is
automatically prevented.
§ Looking at it from another angle, out of the 10 samyojanas (those that binds one to saṃsāra),
three are removed at the Sotāpanna stage: sathkaya diṭṭhi (the idea that all actions one does
with the six sense bases to achieve amisa sukha are beneficial), vicikicchā (distorted mindset),
and silabbata paramasa (the idea that Nibbāna can be attained just by following precepts,
without purifying one’s mind). All three are due to not having Sammā Diṭṭhi, or not knowing
the true nature of the world: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ In the Sabbasava Sutta, there are seven recommended methods for removing defilements for
anyone starting on the Path. The first item on the list describes how one can get rid of a bulk of
defilements just with correct vision of “this world”, i.e., “dassanena pahathabba“; this is what
was discussed above.
§ Once one understands the true nature of “this world” and understands how to remove the rest of
the defilements, then the other six steps are taken, of which “bhavanaya pahathabba” (i.e.,
removal by meditation) comes last. Today, most people start meditating without clearly
understanding what to meditate about.
2. Thus, first one needs to understand why we need to escape from “this world”.
§ The three characteristics of “this world” (see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“) tell us that we can
NEVER achieve AND maintain whatever we desire (characteristic of anicca), thus we mostly
end up with suffering (dukkha), and thus one is not in control and becomes helpless (anatta).
The Buddha merely DISCOVERED this true nature of the world. Many people take Buddha
Dhamma to be pessimistic, but Buddha was just a messenger.
§ Moreover, the Buddha gave us an optimistic message too. For those who are willing to examine
the true nature of the world, there is a better version of happiness that comes from moving away
from “this world”, i.e., by voluntarily giving up craving for things in this world. This is the
nirāmisa sukha of Nibbāna (see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?),
which increases as one starts on the Path and becomes complete and PERMANENT at the
Arahant stage. Even if one does not get to the first stage of Nibbāna, the Sotāpanna stage, one
could experience this nirāmisa sukha, and may help shorten the path to Nibbāna in the
upcoming lives.
3. Therefore it is CRITICAL to understand anicca, dukkha, anatta, before we proceed further here. If
you have not done so, please spend some time critically examining and contemplating on these
concepts described under many posts on this website, in particular, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma” and the links following that on “Sansāric Time Scale“, and
“Evidence for Rebirth“, and “Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca. Dukkha, Anatta so
Important?“. It may be even helpful for many to scan through many other posts before reading those
posts.
§ That is a lot of reading. But “this world” of 31 realms is very complex. Please keep re-reading
all posts until you understand the message. Most of these concepts have been hidden for
thousand years, and have been badly distorted, especially anicca and anatta. Think about the
fact that all biological matter is constituted from just four bases of DNA, and all computer
codes are based on two units, 0 and 1. Thus, one could see how complex the “whole
existence” with 31 realms is when there are 28 types of rūpa, 89 types of cittas and 52 types of
cetasikas are involved!
4. The main conclusion from anicca, dukkha, anatta is “asarattena anatta“, i.e., “anatta in the sense
of it is fruitless to crave for anything in this world”. Thus the Buddha said, “anissitoca viharathi, na
ca kinci loke upadiyathi“, i.e., “There is nothing in this world that is fruitful, there is nothing to be
craved”.
§ People “behave badly” in order to “get what they perceive to be valuable”. All immoral acts are
done to “get what we want”. We crave for something and greed arise, and then when we don’t
get what we wish for, we get angry and hate arises. We first think bad thoughts (mano
saṅkhāra), then follow through with bad words (vacī saṅkhāra), and bodily action (kaya
saṅkhāra). We do all this because we do not have an understanding of the true nature of the
world, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta, and related facts: knowledge of the rebirth in a wider world
of 31 realms with suffering. Thus we do all other bad acts with established wrong views (niyata
micchā diṭṭhi); see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
5. Now let us see what happens when one starts learning the true nature of the world including
anicca, dukkha, anatta, and ALSO the consequences of immoral actions: Then one thinks, “Is it
worthwhile to steal from someone to get what I want, which in the end will do me more harm than
good (because those will not provide any permanent happiness, AND one has to pay the price of an
immoral action if not in this life but in upcoming lives?)”.
§ Same for any other immoral act: to hurt someone by, uttering false, slandering, harsh, or
frivolous speech; stealing, killing, or engaging in sexual misconduct (hurting other parties
involved). AND all those start with covetousness, ill-will, and all those are done because of
established false views that fruitful things can be had in this world by hurting others without
any bad consequences for oneself.
6. Thus when one is about to think of doing such a bad deed or having bad thoughts, this “clear
vision” or sammā diṭṭhi will help get rid of such thoughts and instead think, “this person is in the
same boat, struggling to survive in a world setup for failure”. Thus instead of bad thoughts one will
have thoughts of fellowship and compassion for other beings.
§ Also one will be working to learn more Dhamma and will be constantly thinking about
Dhamma concepts like anicca, dukkha, anatta; the joy from deeper understanding will provide
incentive to dig deeper on concepts that are not clear. Thus Sammā Diṭṭhi leads to the next step
in the Noble Eightfold Path: Sammā Sankappa.
7. With such a mindset one will avoid the four forms of bad speech (lying, slandering, vicious talk,
vain talk), because one realizes that such acts will only lead to loss of peace of mind as well as
hurting others. Thus one will start living with Sammā Vaca; also see, “Right Speech – How to Avoid
Accumulating Kamma“.
8. Similarly, one will clearly see that there is no point in engaging in immoral bodily acts (killing,
stealing, and sexual misconduct) in order to get some temporary satisfaction, which in the end will
come back to haunt oneself with magnified bad consequences. This will AUTOMATICALLY guide
one to act in a moral fashion, i.e., one will have Sammā Kammanta.
9. In standard texts, it says one will not undertake the five lifestyles that are to be avoided:
(a) Dealing and killing animals for meat trade.
(b) Dealing in poisons.
(c) Dealing in weapons and arms.
(d) Dealing in slave trade and prostitution.
(e) Dealing in intoxicants or liquors and drugs.
§ Sammā ajiva is more than that. Thus one’s lifestyle will automatically change to not only moral
living, but also to avoid any kind of act which will be harmful to oneself and/or others. One will
take care of one’s responsibilities towards one’s family and the society, because otherwise one
will get in deeper debt, and will not have the mindset to contemplate; see, “Kamma, Debt, and
Meditation“.
§ Following the Path is much more than just abandoning everything and becoming a
bhikkhu or just following some guidelines or precepts. It needs to be done with wisdom
gained through learning Dhamma. This is Sammā Ajiva.
10. As one feels the benefits of such a lifestyle, one will start feeling the nirāmisa sukha (see, “Three
Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?)”. Then one will be motivated to stay on that Path,
and also to learn more about the Buddha Dhamma and to contemplate more on the Three
Characteristics (one is said to have a complete understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta only when
one reaches the Arahanthood or full NIbbana). This renewed effort is Sammā Vayama.
11. The above six factors will make one’s mind purified and one will start “seeing” better. One will
start working with “yoniso manasikara” (clear vision). It is more than clear thinking; even a master
thief plans his work with clear thinking (on the wrong side).
§ Here what it means is one always looks at any issue with anicca, dukkha, anatta in the mind:
that it is not possible to maintain things to our satisfaction in the long run; that the more we
attach either via greed or hate, the more we will suffer; that it is unwise to do immoral things
for temporary happiness to become helpless at the end. This is Sammā Sati.
12. When one starts meditating (and this does not have to be last; one can start slowly from the
beginning), one will be easily able to get to Sammā Samādhi, focused attention (ekaggata). The
more one proceeds on the Path (i.e., the more the mind becomes purified), easier samādhi starts to
grow in oneself.; one starts feeling a “lightness” even when not doing formal meditation.
§ If one works on developing jhānas, one will be able to get to Ariya jhānas. Whether one will be
using meditation on the Three Characteristics, Satipaṭṭhāna, or any other other type of
mediation, that will eventually lead to the four levels of Nibbāna.
13. It is important to realize that “Sammā” in all these eight steps means “san” (adding things to
perpetuate the suffering/rebirth process) + “ma” (remove or get rid of). Thus Sammā Diṭṭhi is the
vision (anicca, dukkha, anatta) that helps removing “san“; Sammā Sankappa are the thoughts that
help remove ‘san“; Sammā Vaca is the kind of speech that helps remove ‘san“, etc.
§ Thus, one adheres to the eight steps through the UNDERSTANDING of anicca, dukkha,
anatta, and not merely for the sake of following some guidelines or precepts. One understands
the futility of continuing this rebirth process.
Next, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“, …………
1. As long as one considers something to be valuable, it is not easy to give it up, It does not matter
what ANYONE ELSE says. One will go to much effort and expense to make sure it stays with
oneself.
§ But if one’s own mind sees that something is useless and worthless, then what is the point of
keeping it? One will gladly get rid of it.
§ One’s perception of the “world out there” and “what is valuable and what is not” depends on
one’s mind. Even though we look at a pile of feces with disgust, a dog or a pig may eat it with
relish. And a dog does not have any cravings for gold or money.
§ While some people gain pleasure by torturing animals, most are disgusted by such acts. It
depends on the level of understanding. A purified mind will see things in a better perspective.
2. The common thinking about Buddhism goes like this: “The Buddha said that this rebirth process is
full of suffering, and to stop the rebirth process we need to give up everything in this world to detach
from it. But that is not easy to do. I like the stuff that I have and I enjoy life. May be I can attain
Nibbāna in a future life”.
§ That is not a correct interpretation of what the Buddha said. The Buddha did say that “this
rebirth process is full of suffering”. He never asked anyone to give up anything that they had.
His only advice was “learn the true nature of this wider world of 31 realms that is characterized
by anicca, dukkha, anatta and realize the dangers in staying in it”.
§ If one truly understood the true nature of the world one’s own mind will see the futility of
hanging onto worldly things. Nekkhamma or “giving up” is not done forcibly, IT JUST
HAPPENS when one comprehends the true nature of “this world”.
3. If one understands the above few paragraphs, then one knows more about Buddha Dhamma
compared to 90% of the “Buddhists”. Even many Theravāda bhikkhus say, “May you attain Nibbāna
after enjoying future lives in Deva realms”, or “May you have much worldly pleasures and attain
Nibbāna when the next Buddha [Maitreya (Sanskrit), Metteyya (Pāli), Maithree (Sinhala)] appears in
the world”. They apparently do not comprehend the dangers in staying in the rebirth process.
§ This is in sharp contrast with Buddha Gotama’s last words, “appamadena sampadeta” or
“strive diligently and comprehend “san” (and attain Nibbāna)”, because this rebirth process is
wrought with unimaginable dangers. Even if we live perfectly moral lives, we do not know
what kind of kamma that we have done in past lives, and thus there is no way to guarantee a
good rebirth unless one attains the Sotāpanna stage and makes those worst kamma beeja
ineffective.
§ This life of about 100 years is just a “blink of an eye” compared to trillions of years in future
lives (unless one attains Nibbāna); but it is also unimaginably precious because we very rarely
get a chance to be born human and most living beings are in the lowest four realms; see, “How
the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
4. Buddha Dhamma is all about PURIFYING one’s mind so that the mind can grasp the true nature of
this world. The only actions one needs to take are to live a moral life, gradually adhere to a lifestyle
that avoids the ten defilements (dasa akusala), AND learn Dhamma, in particular truly understand
anicca, dukkha, anatta. Everything else will fall into place.
§ When one purifies one’s mind, it becomes clear that the things that one believes to be valuable
are not valuable at all, AND such cravings can bring so much suffering in the future. But one
cannot take that advice coming from even a Buddha and act on it forcibly; ONE’S MIND HAS
TO SEE IT.
§ One may take many precautions to safeguard a “gem” that one thinks has much value. But if
the gem is assessed by an expert and is found to be worthless, then one will no longer have the
same “attachment” for the “gem” and may throw it away. But until the perception is there in the
mind that the “gem” is valuable, one will not part with it.
5. There is another aspect of this forcibly giving up. In addition to the fact that one will be under
stress if one tries to do that, one may be accumulating bad kamma vipāka if one acts irresponsibly.
For example, if one decides that he needs to become a bhikkhu and abandons his kids and wife, that is
an unwise thing to do.
§ We have to act mindfully and with wisdom, making sure that we do not hurt ourselves, our
families, or anyone else. Buddha Dhamma is all about the mind, and not about mechanically
doing meaningless rituals. As we discussed in several posts, it is the intention and the
enthusiasm for doing good, that really matters.
§ One can progress all the way up to the Anāgāmī stage of Nibbāna as a “householder”, i.e.,
while fulfilling one’s responsibilities as a husband/wife, parent, etc. While one should certainly
give to charity, one needs to make sure that there is enough left to support one’s family. And it
is not possible to contemplate or meditate if one has to worry about the next meal or a place to
stay.
6. As one makes progress, giving up will happen automatically at the level of one’s understanding,
and as needed. One does not have to make plans in advance about what to give up or anything like
that: “Dhammo ha ve rakkati dhamma cari”, or “Dhamma will guide and protect those who follow
the Path”. As the mind becomes clear of the hindrances, one will make better decisions, and will not
hurt anyone in the process.
7. About 20 years after the Buddha attained Enlightenment, he had to start adding “vinaya rules” for
the bhikkhus. When Buddha Dhamma started flourishing, many unscrupulous people started to enroll
as bhikkhus to enjoy “a good life”. The Buddha admonished that such bhikkhus accumulate much bad
kamma by getting indebted to those people who make offerings out of saddhā.
§ Vinaya (“vi”+”naya” where “naya” means debt) means stay free of debts. The bhikkhus can do
that by diligently pursuing Nibbāna and also by explaining Dhamma to those people, while
making sure not to abuse their privileged life where they are honored for these very acts.
8. Getting to debt is bad for lay people too. All our current responsibilities have their origins in the
past where we became indebted to others. It may take a while to comprehend this, but we are really
paying off debts to even our kids. And if we do not do a good job of it, we WILL have to do it in
future lives. Any other relationship is the same way; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation”.
§ One time a bhikkhu started sharing his food from the alms round with his parents, and other
bhikkhus complained to the Buddha. The Buddha asked why he did that he said his parents had
become beggars and that is why he did that. The Buddha praised that Bhikkhu and officially
endorsed it as a vinaya rule, that bhikkhus can take care of their parents if the need arose. Even
as a Bhikkhu, one is obliged to take care of one’s parents.
9. When someone gets help from another, it is the obligation of the receiver to show his/her gratitude
for that kindly act, by doing a pattidana or “giving merits” to that person; see, “Transfer of Merits
(Pattidana) – How does it Happen?”. If the receiver becomes able to pay back in kind, that should be
done too.
§ When we deal with people in everyday life, we are engaged in paying back debts even
unknowingly. Thus it is a good idea to fulfil one’s responsibilities to the best of one’s ability.
This applies to most everyday things we do. Our employment responsibilities needs to be done
to the best of our ability. When we do not fulfil our responsibilities anywhere, we stay indebted
and accumulate more debt with interest.
§ When doing transactions, we need to make sure that everyone is compensated adequately;
otherwise, such debts will have to be paid in the future. Again, intention and the “state of mind”
are key factors: We may be able to fool other people, but we cannot fool our own minds.
§ We have enemies because we have had conflicts with them before. And someone has to break
that vicious cycle. This is why the Dhammapada verse, “na hi verena verani….” says: “Hatred
never ceases through hatred, but through love alone they cease”. This is an eternal law.
10. Beings in the lower four realms DO NOT HAVE an advanced mental state to affect their future
even short term, i.e., in this life; they are simply paying off debts and paying for their immoral acts in
the past . They just “go with the flow” spending kammic energy that has been accumulated; unless
they are fortunate to receive the benefits of a “good kamma beeja” from the past (when they were in
higher worlds) at the time of death, they are stuck in the lower realms.
§ On the other hand, HUMANS CAN totally change their future, within this lifetime (mundane
progress), but also affect the future lives: If one wants to avoid the niraya (hell) one needs to
remove the causes that could cause rebirth in niraya, i.e., deep hate. If one wants to avoid
rebirth as a hungry ghost (peta loka), then one need to remove causes for that, i.e., excessive
greed. If one does not want to be reborn an animal one needs to remove both greed and hate. To
avoid birth as an asura, one needs to take care of oneself, and not depend on others.
11. Buddha Dhamma is a complete theory on existence. EVERYTHING can be explained in a
systematic way. If everyone can grasp the basic message of the Buddha, our world will be much safer
place.
§ When a tree is growing all we need to do is to water it, provide nutrients, and generally take
care of it; the fruits from the tree will come out naturally. No amount of praying or wishing is
going to get the tree to give more fruits. In the same way, when we follow the Path correctly,
everything else will “fall into place”. There is no need to pray or to make wishes or do anything
else.
§ This world, for all its drawbacks, plays by the rules. Things just do not happen; they happen
due to causes. When one understands the causes for bad outcomes, one can work to stop such
causes and make sure bad outcomes NOT TO ARISE in the future; this is the meaning of the
“nirodha” (=”nir” + “udā“, where “nir” is stop and “udā” is arising; thus “stop from arising”).
12. The real message of the Buddha is that spending one’s whole life in making mundane progress is
really insignificant in the sansāric time scale; why spend all that time to achieve a high status,
earn a billion dollars, or anything else mundane if one has to leave all that behind within 100
years? We have done this over and over countless times. This rebirth process can run into many more
trillions of years into the future and this larger world of 31 realms is wrought with unimaginable
dangers.
§ The ultimate solution is to stop the rebirth process (eliminate causes for future rebirths), and to
release the mind from the material body that leads to much suffering.
§ Thus the key message of the Buddha was to “attain the suffering-free Nibbāna by eliminating
the causes for rebirth: greed, hate, and ignorance”.
§ But that message itself can only be grasped via purifying one’s mind to a certain extent by
learning about the true nature of the wider world of existence: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
Also see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas“, “Nibbāna – Is It Difficult to Understand?“,
and “What are Rūpa? (Relation to Nibbāna)“.
6.3.10 Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata
1. Anicca is the key to the Sotāpanna stage. Once one comprehends anicca, one can see how dukkha
arises, and thus why one is totally helpless (anatta) in this rebirth process; then one “sees” that the
only permanent happiness is attained via seeking Nibbāna.
§ “Uppada vayattena anicca”, or “anicca because everything that arises in this world cannot be
maintained the way we like”
§ Thus in order to understand anicca better, we need to realize that everything that we
EXPERIENCE in this world has causes for its arising and when those causes (kammic energy)
are depleted they are destroyed too. Not only that, during the time they are in existence, many
of them change unpredictably (this is called viparināma versus parināma if things change
orderly). Anything that arises in this world is called a “saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)”; see,
“Difference between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (Sankata)“.
§ Thus a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) can be defined as something that arises due to causes,
since nothing arise without causes. Thus the only entity that is not a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) is Nibbāna, which is attained via removing all causes.
2. A saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (pronounced “sankatha”) is an entity arising due to a saṅkhāra; a
saṅkhāra is also a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), because just like any other saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala), any saṅkhāra arises and falls; thus saṅkhāra is sometimes used to include both; see below.
[See WebLink: suttacentral: Saṅkhatalakkhaṇa Sutta] [saṅkhata :[pp. of saṅkharoti] conditioned;
prepared; produced by a cause.]
§ A saṅkhāra arises directly in one’s mind. What we normally call saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)
arise DUE TO those saṅkhāra.
3. Therefore, a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is normally reserved for something that arises due to
saṅkhāra (a living being, house, nest, a thought, hopes and dreams, etc) and eventually is destroyed.
Nothing in this world lasts forever.
§ At the deepest level, anything in this world arises due to the mind. It will take us some more
time to get to that, but that is what was meant by the Buddha when he said, “manopubbangamā
dhamma……” or “mind precedes everything else…”.
§ This was described in detail in the Aggañña sutta, but please do not bother to look it up on the
internet, because ALL existing translations are embarrassingly erroneous. I have discussed it
briefly in, “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
4. In “sabbe saṅkhāra anicca…..”, by saṅkhāra what is meant is saṅkhāra AND saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala), everything in this world except “nāma gotta”, which are just records of events.
§ Thus all we experience are saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). Anything that experience lasts only
momentarily; then it goes to “the past” and gets incorporated into pañcakkhandha. Thus
anything included in pañcakkhandha is born as a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
§ It is easy to see that all vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa are saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
5. However, here we pay special attention to material things, because those are ones that give us
a perception of “valuable things worth taking possession of”, sometimes via “any means
possible”. Until we get this perception out of our minds, intentionally or unintentionally we will
be doing immoral things that will force us to be reborn in the lowest four realms.
§ Any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) has a lifetime: a fly with a lifetime of a few days, a human
with a lifetime of about 100 years, the Chinese Great Wall lasting tens of thousands of years, or
a whole universe lasting billions of years, are all saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (of course none
of them made directly by saṅkhāra; they are the end result. This cannot be explained even with
many essays, and will take a while to get to). But we will take a few simple examples to explain
the fundamental idea in this post.
6. What is the difference between a “material saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)” that is inert and another
that is “alive”?
§ For example, a tree is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala); it grows starting from a seed and
eventually dies; that IS the end of the tree. The causes to form the tree that were embedded in
the seed led to the growth of the tree, but as the causes got depleted the tree died.
§ But when a human dies, of course the physical body decomposes, but death is not the end of
that being. Because a living being grasps a new existence with a new abhisaṅkhāra (strong
strong forms of saṅkhāra that can give rise to rebirth) at the moment of death. Even though an
Arahant, may have kamma beeja due to old abhisaṅkhāra, any of those will not be grasped at
death.
§ All inert things in this world came into existence a long time ago, and how they come about
ORIGINALLY from saṅkhāra involves Dhamma that is very deep. But they all, and the whole
physical universe will come to an end when the universe dies in billions of years.
§ Yet the sentient beings have been in existence from beginning-less time. Each time we die, we
come back with a new existence (new bhava).
7. During the lifetime of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), it goes through five loosely-defined stages;
there are no clear-cut delineations in between adjacent stages. This is because a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) is changing every moment.
§ A good simile is the rising of the Sun and its disappearance at the end of a day. Since the cycle
remains virtually unchanged through the year, let us consider this cycle in a country close to the
equator. There from about 4 am to about 7 am it is called a sunrise; from that time to Noon the
sunshine grows and is peaked around Noon. The “full Sun” is there from about 11 am to about
4 pm, where the power of the Sun is optimum. Then it starts going down and around 7 pm it
starts to get dark; then the last part of the night takes over. Yet at each moment, the Sun is
moving and the status keep changing.
8. In the same way, a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) goes through five stages: udayangama (rising),
asthangama (growing), assāda (Sinhala is asvada) (optimum), ādīnava (Sinhala is adeenava) (decay
starts), and nissaraṇa (last stages leading to death); see, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana –
Introduction“.. [samudayañca atthaṅgamañca assādañca ādīnavañca nissaraṇañca (see
“Khuddakapāṭha Cūḷaniddesa 5 Pārāyanavagganiddesa 1. Ajitamāṇavapucchāniddesa“)]
§ Understanding these five stages of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is the key to the
anuloma ñāṇa, without which one cannot get to the sammatta ñāṇa, and eventually to
Nibbāna.
9. For example, a seed germinates and starts a bud; this is the arising (udayangama) stage. Then it
grows to a healthy young tree; this is the growing (atthangama) stage where there are no flowers or
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
734 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
fruits yet. Then comes the assāda (optimum) stage where the tree is flourishing and is full of flowers
and fruits. But then with time, the tree will give less fruits and is on the way down; this is the ādīnava
(decaying) stage where it can come down with various diseases too. This process continues as the
nissarana stage until it dies.
§ A human or animal (the only realms we can see) will go through the same process. A human
life starts not as a baby but a single cell in the womb; from there to a baby of couple of years is
the arising (udayangama) stage. Then comes the growth (atthangama) stage until about 15
years or so. Life peaks from there to about 30-35 years, and that is the time one really enjoys
life, the assāda (optimum) stage. But then inevitably, the decay process starts and one starts
feeling aches and pains, diseases, etc in the ādīnava stage. This stage is continued in the final
stage (somewhere starting from 50-100 years depending on individual) of nissarana leading to
death.
§ Here is a video produced for the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II. Someone has taken a
lot of time to put together this video, and it shows four stages of her life. Each of us can do the
same (but we of course don’t have enough pictures taken to put together a video like this):
“WebLink: YOUTUBE: Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II“
§ Even an inert object like a house, a star, or even a whole universe goes through the same
process.
10. This is the underlying nature of this anything in this world, and that is why it is anicca: no matter
how much we try, we will not be able to maintain anything to our satisfaction over long times.
§ And the reason that this process does not stop for a living being is that during a life, a
living being makes more than enough causes for this process to start all over.
§ Some of these causes are good and will lead to “good existences”, where there is relatively
more happiness, but more often the causes are bad (due to ignorance of this basic fact), and will
lead to existences where the suffering is very great.
§ Thus we can see how dukkha (suffering) arises due to the transient nature of saṅkhata (sankata
in Sinhala), which in turn leads to the conclusion that one is truly helpless (anatta) in this
sansāric process. If one truly understands this fact, that itself leads to the Sotāpanna magga
stage of Nibbāna (one of the “atta purisa puggalā”).
11. These five stages in between the arising and perishing can be seen in anything or any event, and
in order to understand the ever-changing nature of everything, we need to see this in everything/every
action around us.
§ Let us take an example of eating a meal. Sitting down to eat is the uadayangama stage; then
with a few bites one is into the attangama stage, and then one really starts enjoying the meal in
the assāda stage. But then the hunger goes away, and one starts feeling full and getting tired of
eating; this is the ādīnava stage. Finally, one stops eating and that is nissarana.
§ One develops an urge to listen to music, and start the playing device (uadayangama); one starts
listening (atthangama), and starts to enjoy the music (assāda). But after a while, the
satisfaction wares away, and the enjoyment kind of fades away (ādīnava), and finally one had
enough of it and stops (nissarana).
§ The more we start seeing this we can get rid of the two extremes of “something is there with a
sense of long-lasting” and “there is nothing there at all”. Things have a transient existence; they
exist for finite durations as long as the underlying causes are there, changing every moment.
12. This above analysis was given by the Buddha to help us realize that there are no “permanent” or
“existing” entities “in this world”. But we cannot say “nothing exists” either. The Buddha rejected
both “exists” and ‘does not exist” extremes, just as he rejected “self” and ‘no-self” extremes. Things
and living beings exist, not as enduring entities but as ever-changing entities; AND the suffering
is real.
§People who do not comprehend the message of the Buddha try to come up with “sophisticated
looking” statements about the existence, suffering, and Nibbāna.
§ The message of the Buddha was profound (because it had never been known), but simple once
explained: There is no reason to be arrogant because we are born human (may be with lot of
wealth) or to be depressed if one is born to poverty; this life lasts only a fleeting moment in the
sansāric scale. We should try to end this suffering-filled rebirth process without delay, because
no one knows when the death comes, and in the next life we could be in a REALLY helpless
existence.
13. There are CAUSES for saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) to arise: that knowledge embedded in the
“udayavaya ñāṇa”; see, “Uadayavaya Ñāṇa – Introduction“.
§ The relevant basics for that are discussed in the series of posts starting with “Namagotta,
Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Thalaya (Mind Plane)“, …….
§ Also, related, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?“, ……..
The first stage of Nibbāna — the Sotāpanna stage — is also called the Stream Enterer in English and
Sovān in Sinhala.
o The Sotāpanna Stage
o Why a Sotāpanna is Better off than any King, Emperor, or a Billionaire
o Myths about the Sotāpanna Stage
o Anuloma Paṭiloma Paṭicca Samuppāda – Key to Sotāpanna Stage
o Sotāpanna Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna
o Sotāpanna Anugāmi – No More Births in the Apāyās
o Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala
o Sotāpatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna
o Sammā Diṭṭhi – Realization, Not Memorization
o How Does One Know whether the Sotāpanna Stage is Reached?
o Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana
§ Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana – Introduction
o Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage – (in the “Mental Body – Gandhabba“ section).
o 12.
Key Factors to be Considered when “Meditating” for the Sotāpanna Stage (in the “Bhāvanā
(Meditation)“ section).
Also, see the following posts in the Abhidhamma section for more details (these could be helpful
even if you have not studied Abhidhamma):
It is imperative to learn the correct Dhamma from an Ariya in order to attain the Sotāpanna stage (one
of the four requirements); see, “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala“. We will
discuss a simile for attaining the Sotāpanna stage in that regard. The Sabbasava Sutta is briefly
discussed to show the importance of removing wrong views first.
A Simile for Sammā Diṭṭhi (attaining the Sotāpanna Stage)
1. Suppose a man lives in an area that is normally full of sense pleasures. But there are occasional
flooding, droughts, and also Earthquakes. When such calamities occur, he gets distraught and thus his
mind is not at ease most of the time.
§ Yet, he has accumulated some wealth and in the back of his mind, he believes that “everything
will be OK” in the long run.
2. Then one day, an old friend (who has been on travel for many years) comes back and tells him that
the reason he left was to find a better place to live. The friend says that he did some research and
found out that this land is inherently unstable and within several years is going to be destroyed in an
Earthquake.
§ Furthermore, he says that he found a place that is very prosperous and that there are no worries
about flooding, drought, or Earthquakes there. But it is a long journey to that place.
3. The man tells the friend that he had heard about such wonderful places from other people before.
He had followed them at times, but everytime came back after trekking for some time, because he
could not see any benefit. Plus, he says, “how do I know what you say is right? I know that
everything is not perfect here, but can you show evidence for your theory that there is going to be a
big Earthquake? Also, how can I believe you that this place you found is so wonderful?”
4. The friend shows him all the evidence that he had gathered why this area is unsuitable for living in
the long run. He also shows evidence about the prosperity of the new place and also describes to him
the travel path.
§ The evidence is compelling, and the man decides to follow the advice of the friend and see
where that leads to. This is analogous to becoming a Sotāpanna magga anugami.
5. The man spends a lot of time reading about and contemplating on all the evidence that he received.
Then he begins to realize that what the friend is saying is true. He decides to take an exploratory trip
on that path, and makes suitable preparations as suggested by the friend.
§ Once in a while he wonders whether all these preparations are going to be a waste of time. But
as he keeps on assessing the evidence he becomes more and more convinced that he needs to
take that trip.
6. He starts on the trip and is encouraged by seeing some “landmarks” that the friend told him about.
Even though once in a while he thinks about all the “pleasures” he could have had if he stayed home,
these “landmarks” give him encouragement to go further and then reaches one of the four “major
stopovers” that the friend told about.
§ Once he gets to that destination, he becomes totally convinced about the truth of his friend’s
conclusions. Now there is no going back for him. This is the Sotāpanna stage.
7. Thus it is very important to first find out all about what the goal is (Nibbāna), correct instructions
to get there (the Path), and most of all why it is not profitable or wise to stay home (i.e., to stay in
“this world”). The last one is the critical one to comprehend first, because unless one sees the dangers
of the status quo, one will not be motivated to take action (to start on the Path).
8. Realizing the inherent instability of “this world” is the true understanding of the Three
Characteristics: anicca, dukkha, anatta. He realizes that there is no point in the current struggle in
trying to make permanent peace in a place (“this world”) which is inherently not set up to provide
that relief (see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma”). And that Nibbāna means ultimate,
permanent peace of mind. Just this realization leads to the “point-of-no-return”, the Sotāpanna stage.
9. One day the Buddha asked Ven. Sariputta to clarify what is meant by “sota” and “Sotāpanna“.
Ven. Sariputta said, “sota” is the Noble Eightfold Path, and a “Sotāpanna” is one who follows the
Path correctly. To follow the Path, first one needs to have a map or the layout of “our existence”.
§ What we observe with our limited sense faculties is only a very small part of a much more
complex world; we are beginning to see a bit more of that wider world with the technological
advances made by science. But it is still an insignificant fraction of the whole picture.
§ The whole picture is very complex, but we do not need to learn all about it (but if one has time
one could learn Abhidhamma and learn minute details). The Buddha has condensed the very
essence of the existence in this wider world by its Three Characteristics (Tilakkhaṇa): anicca,
dukkha, anatta. When one comprehends those characteristics, one can “see” what lies ahead,
and what to do about it.
§ Thus one attains the Sotāpanna stage with just Sammā Diṭṭhi, which is the correct view of
the wider world.
10. After attaining the Sotāpanna stage, he KNOWS what needs to be done and HOW it is to be
done. Then he diligently follows the Path and attains the next three stages, culminating in Nibbāna.
The Way to the Sotāpanna Stage
The key here is that without knowing about the Buddha’s world view (31 realms of existence and the
suffering in the four lower realms, see “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“), one does not
comprehend the “sansāric suffering”; most suffering is incurred when one is born in any of the
four lowest realms. This is important because it is possible that (especially young and wealthy
people) may not experience that much physical and mental suffering in this life. And in order to have
faith in the Buddha’s world view, one needs to spend some time examining the evidence for it.
1. When one clearly sees why it is not fruitful to stay in “this world” of 31 realms, he/she has
understood the true nature, the three characteristics anicca, dukkha, anatta, of “this world”.
§ This clear vision or Sammā Diṭṭhi itself (the realization that there is nothing “substantial” to be
had by staying in “this world”), makes the mind to determine that there is no point in doing
immoral things (those that cause rebirth in the four lower realms).
2. We strive to gain or own “things” in this world because we perceive that we can achieve happiness
eventually; this is sakkāya diṭṭhi or sathkāya diṭṭhi (both “sakka” and “sath” mean “good” or fruitful,
and “kāya” means “kriya” or actions; diṭṭhi means wrong view: thus both these mean our wrong view
that our actions to acquire “things” or to “seek happiness” are good and fruitful.
§ When one truly understands anicca, dukkha, anatta, this wrong view is removed. One realizes
that nothing we do can lead to permanent happiness “in this world”.
3. Furthermore, for one who has clearly seen anicca, dukkha, anatta, the mind does not allow serious
wrong doings (vici + ki+ichcha = liking for wrong actions or things) that could lead to birth in the
lower four realms; there is no doubt regarding the “world vision” that he/she realized. Thus
vicikicchā, or the liking for unfruitful and harmful actions, is removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
4. It is clear that all that is needed to be done is to contemplate on the true nature of the world. It is
done by purifying the mind, and cannot be done just by following certain rituals, such as just obeying
precepts on certain days.
§ Thus the idea of “silabbata paramasa” or “Nibbana can be attained by following rituals” is
removed at the Sotāpanna stage. One realizes what the Buddha said by “sanvarattena seelan“,
i.e., “sīla” or moral behavior is achieved by constraint of eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and
mind, at ALL TIMES, not by “observing precepts” for a day or even several days.
5. For one who has become “dassanena sampanno” (one with true and clear vision), the mindset
changes not by following formal procedures, but by understanding the futility of breaking any
precepts or wrong doings. Even if one does a wrong act, the mistake is realized and one takes care to
avoid it.
6. Please keep in mind that this is not to discourage people from observing precepts as a formality.
This is a good thing to do for those who are starting on the Path, and also a good habit to create in
children. It is customary in Buddhist countries for whole families to go the temple and observe
“panca sīla” or “attangika sīla” on Poya (Full Moon) days.
Key Points from the Sabbasava Sutta
The key to attaining Nibbāna is to remove the Āsavas (residue from fermentation of bad
thoughts/habits over many sansāric births). This will be discussed under the key Dhamma Concepts.
In the Sabbasava Sutta, the Buddha listed seven steps to remove the āsavas and to purify the mind
thus paving the way to Nibbāna. These seven steps are listed below:
1. Removal by clear vision (“dassanena pahathabba”, where dassana is vision and pahathabba is
removal). This is clear understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
2. Removal by the restrained use of the senses (“sanvarena pahathabba”, where sanvara is
disciplined use of the sense faculties: not to over-indulge in the senses).
3. Removal by good and frequent associations (“patisevana pahathabba”, where sevana is
association: for example, with good friends and good deeds).
4. Removal by tolerance and patience (“adhivasana pahathabba”). For example, even if one is
tempted to steal because one is hungry, one should contemplate the consequences and bear the
hunger.
5. Removal by staying clear of “bad influences and environments” (“parivajjana pahathabba”). One
needs to avoid bad friends, bad locations for living (due to floods, bad neighbors, etc), avoiding
unsuitable times to go out, etc.
6. Removal by getting rid of certain things (“vinodana pahathabba”). One needs to get rid of bad
thoughts that come to mind, for example, for excessive sense pleasure, hate, etc.
7. Removal by meditation (“bhāvanā pahathabba”). When one has the clear vision in #1, it becomes
apparent what to contemplate on.
The clear vision is the first on the list. Just like one should not undertake a journey without learning
about the destination, the path, and the reason for the journey, one needs to start getting rid of āsavas
by first having a clear vision of the Buddha’s world view (see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“) and understanding what these āsavas are and how they arise. More on this topic will be
discussed in the “Key Dhamma Concepts” section.
§ There are four āsavas: kamasava (craving for sense pleasures), ditthasava (cravings due to
wrong views) , bhavasava (craving for existence), and avijjasava (cravings due to ignorance).
The ditthasava is removed by the Sotāpanna through clear vision. Once one understood the true
nature of “this world” by contemplating on anicca, dukkha, anatta, one would not commit any
immoral acts to gain anything in “this world”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta - Wrong
Interpretations“. This alone saves one from future rebirths in the lower four realms.
§ A Sotāpanna still has the other three āsavas left. Those are removed mainly by the meditation
on the Saptha Bojjanga.
The other five steps listed in the Sabbasava Sutta, as one can clearly see, are common sense things to
do. They need to be followed at any stage. Actually those steps can be used by anyone to enhance the
quality of life and to remove any bad habits that they have, for example, alcohol or drug use, to eating
too much. A clear vision of why those are bad, and why they need to be stopped is an important step.
§ The Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta covers all seven steps in a somewhat different fashion. The
Ānāpānasati bhāvanā (not the breath meditation version) plays a major role here.
Next, “How to Cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path Starting with Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“, …….
6.4.2 Why a Sotāpanna is Better off than any King, Emperor, or a
Billionaire
Attaining the first stage of Nibbāna (Sotāpanna stage) will remove suffering in the apāyas forever,
which could be more than billions or even trillions of years. This is not an exaggeration since we
have been in this rebirth process from an untraceable beginning; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“. Thus
any achievement in this life of 100 years is no match.
§ Most people think that Buddha Dhamma is a pessimistic “religion”. It is neither a religion nor
is pessimistic. Let us discuss these two issues a bit first.
1. Buddha Dhamma describes the true nature of “this world”, which is far more complex than most
people think.
§ A religion makes a promise that if one abides by its tenets/doctrine and lives this life
accordingly, then one will be rewarded accordingly. In most religions, one is promised birth in
heaven for eternity if this is kept.
§ But a basic tenet in Buddha Dhamma is that this life of about 100 years is just a blip compared
to the countless lives one has had in the past. Even if we live a perfect life during these 100
years, that does not guarantee one anything about the future lives, because we may have
done kamma in PREVIOUS LIVES that could give rebirth in even the lowest four realms, the
apāyas, including the niraya (hell).
§ The only way to GUARANTEE that one will NOT be reborn in the apāyas is to negate the
causes (lobha, dosa, moha) that could give opportunities for all such bad kamma vipāka to
come to fruition. And that is possible only via attaining the Sotāpanna stage. Even though
attaining the Arahant stage of Nibbāna via complete removal of lobha, dosa, moha (and thus
the ten sanyojana or fetters) will do that too, attaining the Sotāpanna stage does not require all
that. It just requires one to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta to the extent that only three
sanyojana (fetters) are removed.
§ Removal of three (or ten) sanyojana cannot be achieved via following set rules/precepts. One
needs to purify one’s mind so that the true nature (anicca, dukkha, anatta) of this complex
world of 31 realms is understood. That is why Buddha Dhamma is not a religion per standard
definition.
§ On the other hand, if one just wants to take what is helpful to lead to moral life and use Buddha
Dhamma as a religion, there is nothing wrong with that. That would be much better than living
an immoral life. As one proceeds, it is possible that Dhamma will become more clear, and that
may provide the incentive to “dig deeper”.
2. Now to the second issue: Because the Buddha emphasized the “suffering in this world”, many
think that Buddha Dhamma is pessimistic. The Buddha did not say that this current life is necessarily
filled with suffering (even though it has more suffering than people realize); rather, most suffering is
encountered in the lowest four realms of the 31 realms. Thus, this reality of suffering is to be
understood in the context of this wider world view. The Buddha just discovered this true nature of
the (more complex) world.
§ Furthermore, he showed how to be free from this inevitable suffering in future births, and to
attain permanent happiness, Nibbāna.
3. Please re-read the above material on those two key points. It is important to look at this “wider
world view” when trying to make an assessment of what we should strive for in this life. This
analysis leads to a whole new perspective if there is evidence to believe the “wider world view” of
the Buddha with repeated rebirths in 31 realms that include the four apāyas with unimaginable
suffering.
§ Does it make sense to spend 60 years of a 80-100 year life to accumulate wealth and fame, if
one is to lose most of one’s sensory enjoyments over the last few decades (and possibly have a
major disease or memory loss)?
§ Does it make sense to accrue unimaginable suffering in the apāyas in future births by
committing any of the dasa akusala (ten defilements) to make money, get a promotion, to live
in a big house, get a prestigious position, etc (for less than 100 years)?
§ The realities of old age, disease, and death hold true for a king, emperor, a billionaire, or a
famous film star just the same as for an average person. At the old age, all these achievements
actually become a mental burden because one constantly thinks about the “good old days” and
become depressed of not being able to enjoy the sensory pleasures just because the whole
sensory system is breaking down.
§ Here is a video that summrizes what I tried to explain the above paragraph :
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Aging Stars of the Golden Age
4. And this predicament is true for ANY being in ANY realm, unless at least the Sotāpanna stage is
attained. A deva or a brahma could enjoy millions of years of pleasurable lives, but WILL end up in
the apāyas at some point in the future unless at least the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna is attained.
There are several incidents mentioned in the Tipiṭaka where the Buddha emphasized how important is
the Sotāpanna stage compared to any existence in the 31 realms:
§ One time the Buddha was crossing a paddy field with 500 bhikkhus where many cattle were
grazing, and smiled. A Buddha (or an Arahant) does not smile frequently, so Ven. Ānanda
asked the Buddha why he smiled. The Buddha said, ” each one of these has been the king of the
devas at some in the past”. Ven. Ānanda asked why that is a reason to smile. Then the Buddha
said, “All these 500 bhikkhus, who are Sotāpannas or above, will never be born an animal. That
is why I smiled”.
§ Another time the Buddha and Ven. Ānanda were walking and saw a piglet by the roadside, and
the Buddha again smiled. Asked why, he said, “This piglet had been a princess in a life way
back; she cultivated anariya jhānas, attained the highest (eighth) jhāna and had abhiññā
powers. She was born in the highest brahma world, but now she is just an animal. On the other
hand, those who have attained the Sotāpanna stage in my sāsana will never be born in the
apāyas“.
5. Many people do not believe in rebirth. But having a belief is not going to help if it is a wrong view.
Considering the possible dire consequences IF one gets this world view wrong, it makes a lot of sense
to spend some time and to critically examine the evidence for rebirth in particular (see, “Evidence for
Rebirth“), and the wider world view of the 31 realms in general (see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“).
6. The niyata micchā diṭṭhi (established wrong views) is one of the stronger ones of the dasa akusala
that could lead to birth in the apāyas; the key word there is “niyata“, or “established”, i.e., one firmly
believes, for example, that there is no rebirth process. One could avoid this by at least having an open
mind, and NOT rule out those possibilities. Even a Sotāpanna may not be truly convinced of some
aspects of the wider world view (but not rebirth): for example, he/she may not have any strong
conviction on the existence of deva worlds, or may not even think about such matters.
§ Another point to consider is how the standard world views have changed over time since the
Buddha revealed his Dhamma about a very complex world with no discernible beginning.
Philosophers since that time (Socrates was a contemporary of the Buddha) put forth many
world views that have been discarded one by one: WebLink: WIKI: Astronomy and cosmology
§ Within the past 100 years, the Buddha’s world view has gained much support from science and
that pace is accelerating with the new string theories as well as quantum mechanics. With all
this impressive advances science has made, it cannot account for 96% of the mass of the
universe; see, WebLink: NASA: Dark Energy, Dark Matter and WebLink: WIKI: Dark matter.
This is beacuse there is so much that we cannot “see” with our eyes or even with the current
scientific instruments; see, “Consciousness Dependence on Number of Dimensions“.
§ There are good reasons to believe that more of these currently hidden aspects of the universe
will be revealed in the future by science. Just imagine that even a hundred years ago, scientists
believed that the universe had only a few galaxies and that it was stable. Now we know that
there are billions of galaxies in our universe, that there could be numerous universes, and all
those universes are not stable, i.e., they are born and will perish in the future.
§ Until recently, the humans also had the wrong impression that the Earth is at a special place in
the universe. But now we know that it is an insignificant “speck of dust” in a vast universe; see
the video in “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
7. Please spend some quiet time contemplating on these issues. These posts are not for reading
pleasure; these are issues that have far more serious consequences than making a billion dollars.
Some of my friends tell me that I should “tone down” the content because many people are turned off
by the “realities of the world”.
But my goal is not to have a huge readership. Rather, if I can convey the true message of the Buddha
for even a few people I would have accomplished my goal. There is ONLY ONE set of natural laws
and we cannot alter them, just like we cannot alter the laws of motion: If a car is headed to a brick
wall, the car needs to be stopped or the consequences will not be good. Let me give a few examples
of how the Buddha assessed this situation:
§ Some brahmins complained to the Buddha that he was not spending enough time on debating
them, but would spend a lot of time with even a few of his disciples. The Buddha asked this
question: “Suppose a farmer has three paddy fields: one is extremely productive, another is OK
but requires considerably more time to yield a good harvest, and the third field is of such a poor
condition it is impossible to get any harvest. Which field would the farmer put his efforts on?
He will first take care of the most productive field, totally disregard the third field, and spend
whatever extra time he has on the second field. It is the same way with me. I want to help those
who are interested and capable of learning my Dhamma. Debating with those who have closed
minds is a waste of time”.
§ One day the Buddha and Ven. Ānanda walked for many miles to a village to deliver a
discourse. Everybody gathered and the Buddha was sitting there for a couple of hours without
starting the discourse. Finally, a farmer who had lost a cow and was out in the forest looking for
it found the cow, went home, took a bath, ate, and came hurrying to the event. The Buddha
started the discourse right after he came in. When they were walking back after the discourse,
Ven. Ānanda asked the Buddha why he kept everyone waiting until that one farmer came in.
The Buddha said, “Ānanda, I walked all this way to give the discourse because of that farmer. I
saw that he was capable of grasping the Dhamma, and he did attain the Sotāpanna stage”.
8. The Buddha said, “This Dhamma is different from anything the world has ever seen”. And that is
true. It takes time to grasp the complexity of this world, much of which is hidden from us (and only a
Buddha is capable of finding them; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction“). There is no need to
rush and embrace everything; one needs to spend time contemplating on the validity of Buddha
Dhamma.
§ There are many introductory but critical posts in the section, “Moral Living and
Fundamentals“. That section is actually more about the basic concepts of Buddha
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 743
Dhamma. I would encourage even those who are familiar with “Buddhism” to peruse that
section, because without the correct basics one cannot grasp more advanced concepts. And I am
certain that 90% of “Buddhists” are not even aware of some of these basic concepts. Please
comment on anything at this site and don’t hesitate to point out any incorrect concepts.
9. We can, in a way, compare this situation with the situation a parent faces with a teenager. The
teenager wants to go out and have a good time with the friends. But the parent says, “do not just think
about the immediate pleasures. If you do not study well and get good grades at school, you will not
have a good job when you grow up”.
§ It is the same here. We are trapped in a “rat race” to just keep up with day-to-day pleasures and
activities. The Buddha’s message is that there is a much longer time frame to think about.
§ This life is just a drop of water compared to the huge ocean that is the sansāric journey of
rebirths. It is imperative to take some time and contemplate on the “bigger picture”. We may
not get another chance of a human birth for millions or billions of years; this is NOT an
exaggeration.
10. But the best part of the Buddha’s message, which has been lost for over thousand years, is that the
nirāmisa sukha is better than any sense pleasures. We are under the illusion that sense pleasures are
to be pursued. If one can taste the happiness from staying away from sense pleasures, one will
NEVER value the sense pleasures. Those who have experienced even anariya jhānic experiences,
will have some idea of such nirāmisa sukha.
§ It is a feeling of huge release more than a pleasure in the sense of consuming a tasty food, for
example. And it is not temporary, especially if one can get to the Sotāpanna stage. Then that
“base level” of relief is never lost, even in future births.
§ When one starts on the Path by comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta, the sense of
peacefulness, the release from stresses, is clearly felt; and that gives an incentive to stay on the
Path even before attaining the Sotāpanna stage.
§ The best part is the realization that one will never be born in the apāyas. Any king, emperor,
billionaire, is not assured of that; on the contrary, the efforts to attain such temporary status
may CAUSE one be born in the apāyas, if one engaged in dasa akusala to attain them.
§ As Carl Sagan pointed out in the video in “The Pale Blue Dot……..“, it is worth while to
contemplate “where are all those kings and emperors who gained fame through the suffering of
so many people?”. They are likely to be in the apāyas suffering for millions of years to come.
Next, “Myths about the Sotāpanna Stage“, ………..
6.4.3 Myths about the Sotāpanna Stage
There are many myths and misconceptions on who a Sotāpanna is, and what needs to be done to
become a Sotāpanna. Here we discuss some of these misconceptions.
1. When I was growing up in Sri Lanka, I was under the impression that a Sotāpanna could fly
through the air, and an Arahant could vanish and reappear as he/she wished. These were the
“mythical” status assigned to Sotāpannas and Arahants. I guess that is due to the fact that such
attainments are perceived these days to be impossible to be attained on the one hand and also a clear
idea of what those attainments mean has been lost.
§ One is unlikely to identify a Sotāpanna or even an Arahant if one has even been associating
with that person.
§ It is true that the attainment of even the Sotāpanna stage is not a trivial matter. And one cannot
expect it to be trivial; see, “Why a Sotāpanna is Better off than any King, Emperor, or a
Billionaire“.
§ A Sotāpanna is incapable of doing only six things: Killing mother, killing mother, killing an
Arahant, injure a Buddha, Saṅgha bheda (teaching adhamma as Buddha Dhamma), having
niyata micchā diṭṭhi; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Bahudhātuka sutta (MN 115)“.
2. The attainment of supernormal powers such as flying through the air or to vanish and reappear is
possible even by developing anāriya jhānas. Most of such attainments are lost at death (even though
the ability to get them back will be easier if one is reborn human again).
§ Attainment of various stages of Nibbāna are accomplished by cleansing one’s mind and it has
nothing to do with developing supernormal powers. Even though it will be much easier for an
Arahant or a Sotāpanna to develop such powers, by the time one attains such levels of purity of
the mind they are not enamored anymore with such supernormal powers. Most of the Arahants
who had supernormal powers at the time of the Buddha had developed those before
encountering Buddha Dhamma. For example, Ven. Sāriputta and Ven. Moggalana were vedic
brahmins who had developed all anāriya jhānas and already possessed such powers before they
met the Buddha.
3. Various stages of Nibbāna are attained by systematically removing the 12 types of akusala citta
(immoral thoughts) or, put it in a different way, by removing the ten samyojana. There are other ways
to describe those conditions too; see, “Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna“.
§ The Sotāpanna stage is reached via removing the four lobha citta that are based on micchā
diṭṭhi (wrong vision), and the moha citta of vicikicchā. It is important to note that the remaining
7 akusala citta including the two dosa-mūla citta are still with a Sotāpanna.
§ The four lobha cittas that a Sotāpanna removes are the ones that are responsible for
vyāpāda, which is the strong version of anger that makes one eligible for rebirth in the apāyas;
see, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“. The two dosa-mūla citta,
which gives rise to milder versions of anger, are removed only that the Anāgāmī stage.
§ Furthermore, kāma rāga (craving for sensual pleasures) is included in the other four lobha-
mūla citta that are “diṭṭhi vippayutta” or “not associated with wrong views”. Thus craving for
sensual pleasures is also removed only at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ Therefore, attaining the Sotāpanna stage — while not trivial — is not as hard as many
people think if one has a tihetuke uppatti. However, it is not possible to determine who has
tihetuka or dvihetuka paṭisandhi; most people belong to those two categories. One with
dvihetuka paṭisandhi cannot attain magga phala or Ariya jhāna in this life, but still can make
progress towards Nibbāna; see, “Patisandhi Citta – How the Next Life is Determined
According to Gathi“.
§ On the other hand, many people are focused on trying to get rid of the perception of “self”. That
is not something that can forced; it just HAPPENS at the Arahant stage. It is not possible to
make that perception go away before that.
4. Turning to another myth, NO ONE ELSE can discern what magga phala one has attained:
Sotāpanna or a higher stage of Nibbāna. Only a Buddha has that capability. Let me give an example
to illustrate this point:
§ One time, Ven. Sāriputta was giving instructions to a bhikkhu. The Buddha came along and told
Ven. Sarputta that the bhikkhu had already attained the Arahantship and thus there is no need to
give instructions to him. It turned out that the bhikkhu in question did not say anything to Ven.
Sāriputta out of respect for him.
§ Now, Ven. Sāriputta is only second to the Buddha in this Buddha Sāsana. He and Ven.
Moggallāna were the two chief disciples: Ven. Sāriputta was second in knowledge to the
Buddha and Ven. Moggallāna was second in psychic powers to the Buddha.
§ Thus, if Ven. Sāriputta was not able to discern whether that bhikkhu was an Arahant, it is NOT
possible for anyone living today to determine the stage of Nibbāna (Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī,
Anāgāmī, Arahant) of any other person.
§ One could be of any race or even religion and still be a jāti Sotāpanna (and, even that person
may not be aware of it). If one had attained the Sotāpanna stage in previous life, he could in
principle, be born anywhere in human or deva realms. Buddha Dhamma describes nature’s
laws; it applies to everyone the same way.
§ Those people who attained various stages of Nibbāna during the early years had different
religious beliefs. They sat down to listen to the Buddha and by the time the discourse was over,
they had attained various stages of Nibbāna. Some people came to debate the Buddha and left
as Sotāpannas. One does not need to formally become a “Buddhist” to realize the true nature of
“this world”.
5. This is why one has to be very careful when dealing with other humans, and not to offend anyone
intentionally. It is very important to have at least some knowledge of the different weights of kamma;
see, “How to Evaluate Different Weights of Kamma“.
§ Some people worry about inadvertently killing insects while cleaning the house, but do not
think twice about saying a lie or a hurtful thing to a human. That is getting things backwards.
§ The severity of the kamma depends on the “level of the being” that it is directed at. It is
EXTREMELY difficult to get a human life; thus a human life could be millions times worth
compared to any animal life. A Sotāpanna is at a more than thousand-fold higher level
compared to a normal human, and the subsequent levels are even higher.
§ There is no being in the 31 realms that is at a higher level compared to an Arahant. That is why
killing an Arahant is a Anantariya pāpa kamma, i.e., it will bring extremely bad vipāka in the
very next life. And it is not possible to say whether a given person is an Arahant by looking at
that person, or even associating with him/her for a short time.
6. How does one discern whether one has attained, say, the Sotāpanna stage?
§ A Sotāpanna does not attain Ariya jhānas coincident with the phala moment. There one’s
“lineage” (gotra) is changed from a normal human to a Sotāpanna at the gotrabu citta. A
similar citta vīthi runs in attaining a jhāna, but in a jhāna one’s lineage is changed only to a
jhānic state at the gotrabu moment; see, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
§ However, if one who just became a Sotāpanna had developed any anāriya jhāna previously,
then that jhāna could be easily converted to an Ariya jhāna with some practice. Unlike an
anāriya jhāna, an Ariya jhāna cannot be broken even if one forcefully tries to generate a
sensual/hateful thought. Thus, for someone who has had jhānic experiences this may be a clue.
§ Also, if one can get into the fourth Ariya jhāna, that means one is at least a Sotāpanna;
probably an Anāgāmī.
§ Another way is to contemplate whether one is capable of doing any acts that could lead to
rebirth in the apāyas (the four lowest realms). If one has ingrained characteristics or habits
(gathi) of an animal, then it is likely that person will be born animal of that character. If one has
extreme hate, and is capable of plotting to bring harm to other people, then that person may be
destined to the niraya. If one does not have any of such extreme greed, hate, and ignorance,
then one may be free of the apāyas, i.e., one is likely to be a Sotāpanna.
§ However, unless one is subjected to extreme pressures, it may not be possible to discern
whether one has removed such “apayagami gathi“. It is easier to live a moral life when one has
enough resources and when nothing unexpected happens. But there are instances when
perfectly “moral people” commit murders in a moment of rage.
§ The Sotāpanna stage is attained purely via attaining Sammā Diṭṭhi, and removing 5 of the 12
possible akusala cittas: 4 lobha cittas associated with micchā diṭṭhi and the vicikicchā citta that
arises out out ignorance of the true nature of “this world”. All these 5 citta are removed via just
comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta to a certain extent; see, “Akusala Citta – How a
Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Cittas“.
§ Thus if one has any ESTABLISHED (niyata) wrong views (see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa
Akusala)“), then it is unlikely that one is a Sotāpanna. Attaining the Sotāpanna stage is not
possible until one sees the “unfrutiful nature” of existence anywhere in the 31 realms; and that
is not possible if one has ruled out rebirth or the existence of other realms; see, “Ten Immoral
Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
§ Also see, “How Does One Know whether the Sotāpanna Stage is Reached?” for more details.
7. Many people believe it is necessary to meditate a lot to attain the Sotāpanna stage. While it is
beneficial to meditate, one can in principle be a Sotāpanna without doing any FORMAL meditation. I
have given some examples from the time of the Buddha in #4 above; however, such cases are rare
these days.
§ There are basically two steps to get rid of lobha, dosa, moha or to attain Nibbāna: “Dassanena
pahathabba” (removal by vision or the “ability to see”) comes first; that is what is necessary to
attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ However, in order to accomplish “Dassanena pahathabba” or “to see clearly”, one needs to
realize what the Buddha meant by “suffering”, which comes in two types. This is described in
detail — starting with the first type of suffering that can be eliminated in THIS LIFE — in the
“Living Dhamma” section.
§ Various stages of Nibbāna are attained as lobha, dosa, moha are removed in stages. One attains
the Sotāpanna stage via “dassanena pahathabba” i.e., one removes those 5 akusala cittas
associated with “wrong views” via discerning the true nature of “this world of 31 realms”, i.e.,
anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ Then, a Sotāpanna can remove the remaining 7 akusala citta in three stages via meditation, i.e.,
“bhavanaya pahathabba” and attain the higher stages Nibbāna.
§ Of course, it is good to meditate before the Sotāpanna stage; it will be beneficial to calm the
mind and to contemplate on anicca, dukkha, anatta. But the “bhāvanā” or meditation that is
needed for the Sotāpanna stage cannot be restricted to formal meditation because moral
conduct or “sīla” sets the necessary environment for the mind to “clearly see” by reducing
pancanivarana; see, “Living Dhamma“.
Next, “Why a Sotāpanna is better off than any King, Emperor, or a Billionaire“, …….
6.4.4 Anuloma Paṭiloma Paṭicca Samuppāda – Key to Sotāpanna Stage
1. Just before his Enlightenment, the Buddha figured how beings are born endlessly due to their own
way of thinking. That knowledge is embedded in Paṭicca Samuppāda, translated as, “Dependent
Origination”.
§ It describes the origins of different types of living beings, according to their own thought
processes (saṅkhāra) based on the level of avijjā (ignorance of the real nature).
§ Anuloma Paṭicca Samuppāda describes the forward progression of events leading to eventual
suffering. Paṭiloma Paṭicca Samuppāda describes the backward progression to see that indeed
avijjā must be removed (by cultivating wisdom or paññā) in order to stop future suffering from
arising.
2. “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Bodhi Sutta (Udāna 1.1)” and “WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiya
Bodhi Sutta (Udāna 1.2)“ state how the Buddha comprehended anuloma and paṭiloma Paṭicca
Samuppāda during the night of the Enlightenment.
§ Most people are quite familiar with how suffering originates with saṅkhāra generation due to
the ignorance of the Four Noble Truths (avijjā), and then goes through the familiar steps:
“avijjāpaccayā saṅkhārā, saṅkhārapaccayā viññāṇaṃ, ..and ends with “.. Evametassa
kevalassa dukkhakkhandhassa samudayo hotī”ti OR “the whole mass of suffering”.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 747
3. It is also important to trace the steps backwards and see how future suffering can be stopped by
cultivating paññā: “avijjānirodhā saṅkhāranirodho, saṅkhāranirodhā viññāṇanirodho,
viññāṇanirodhā nāmarūpanirodho, nāmarūpanirodhā saḷāyatananirodho, saḷāyatananirodhā
phassanirodho, phassanirodhā vedanānirodho, vedanānirodhā taṇhānirodho, taṇhānirodhā
upādānanirodho, upādānanirodhā bhavanirodho, bhavanirodhā jātinirodho, jātinirodhā
jarāmaraṇaṃ sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā nirujjhanti. Evametassa kevalassa
dukkhakkhandhassa nirodho hotī’ti“.
§ By stopping jāti, it is possible to stop suffering from arising (at the end). Now we just go
backwards: Jati (births) stopped by stopping bhava, which is stopped by stopping upādāna,
taṇhā, vedanā, phassa, saḷāyatana, nāmarūpa, viññāṇa, and saṅkhāra. When one gets to the
first step: saṅkhāra cannot be stopped from arising without eliminating avijjā (and thus getting
rid of ALL gati).
§ In fact, if one really contemplates on this process, one can get some deep insights.
4. It is quite clear that in order to stop “the whole mass of suffering”, one MUST stop each of those
10 factors (jāti, bhava, upādāna, taṇhā, vedanā, phassa, saḷāyatana, nāmarūpa, viññāṇa, and
saṅkhāra) from arising.
§ Thus one can clearly see that nirodha means “stop from arising”.
§ One can also see that can be done ONLY by removing avijjā, which is the same as cultivating
paññā.
§ The removal of avijjā (and cultivation of paññā) is done by following the Eightfold path, which
has two components; see, for example, “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“. There are no
shortcuts!
5. We concluded in #4 above that in order to stop future suffering from arising we must stop those 10
terms from arising. This appears not to make sense with some of those terms when we try to reconcile
that with the fact that an Arahant has stopped those from arising.
§ In particular, one could object in particular that vedanā, phassa, viññāṇa, and saṅkhāra still
arise in a LIVING Arahant.
§ As I have explained in many posts scattered throughout the website (especially in the “Paṭicca
Samuppāda” section), those terms are in the “uddesa” version. This is explained in detail in the
post, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Let us discuss briefly a few of those terms.
6. Basically all current English translations just provide word-by-word translations of that “uddesa
version” without any explanation. For example, the English translation of the first sutta in #1 above
states, “..because of consciousness: mind and body, because of mind and body: the six sense spheres,
because of the six sense spheres: contact, because of contact: feeling, because of feeling… because
of continuation: birth, because of birth: old age, death, grief, lamentation, pain, sorrow, and despair
all arise, and so there is an origination of this whole mass of suffering.”.; see, “WebLink: suttacentral:
The First Discourse about the Awakening Tree (UD 1.1)“.
§ According to the second sutta, all those terms (consciousness, sex senses, contact, feeling)
should not arise in an Arahant!
§ Furthermore, it is not clear what is meant by “continuation” (for bhava), which leads to jāti
(births), and thus “this whole mass of suffering”.
7. For example, the step, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” really should be “avijjā paccayā abhisaṅkhāra“.
§ As is explained in the post, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“, an Arahant generates
saṅkhāra, but NOT abhisaṅkhāra.
§ It is those abhisaṅkhāra that lead to future births and thus future suffering!
8. The next step is written in suttas as “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” and that is the uddesa version.
§ It needs to be explained as “abhisaṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“, where viññāṇa means “defiled
consciousness”.
§ An Arahant would have “purified viññāṇa” and NOT “defiled viññāṇa“. This is explained at,
“Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
9. Another confusing step could be “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“, where “saḷāyatana” or “six
āyatana” are normally translated as “six sense faculties”. Of course, a living Arahant has perfectly
good sense faculties (indriya).
§ Those six indriya (or sense faculties) become saḷāyatana when one acts with avijjā and use
them to accumulate “san“; see, “Nāmarūpa paccayā Saḷāyatana“.
10. In next step of “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa“, it is really “saḷāyatana paccayā samphassa“. When
those indriya are used as āyatana, one “makes contact with a defiled mind” and that defiled contact is
“samphassa” (“san” + “phassa“).
§ This is discussed at, “Difference between Phassa and Samphassa“.
§ Therefore, an Arahant would have only “phassa” and NOT “samphassa“.
11. Now when those sense inputs are evaluated with a defiled mind, one generates “mind-made
vedanā” or “samphassa ja vedanā“. These are greedy, angry, jealous, types of vedanā generated due
to the defilements in the mind.
§ Such “defiled and mind-made vedanā” are absent in an Arahant. An Arahant will, however,
generate vedanā due to the contacts with the six indriya.
§ For example, if someone hits an Arahant, he/she will feel the pain. Spoiled milk would taste
bitter and a piece of cake would taste sweet, etc. But an Arahant would not generate angry
thoughts about someone offering spoiled milk and would not generate cravings for the cake.
§ This explained in detail in the post, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
12. The next confusion is at the step, “bhava paccayā jāti“, which is translated in #5 as, “because of
continuation: birth”. I am not sure what is meant by “continuation” there.
§ The correct interpretation is given at, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“.
13. If one can spend some time reading those posts and the links given in them, one should be able to
get a good idea of how different types jāti originate via abhisaṅkhāra (one’s own thoughts).
§ The Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna is attained by getting rid of the wrong way of looking at one’s
body (and actions) are due to an unchanging “soul”.
§ However, one’s bhava and jāti arise due to one’s own abhisaṅkhāra. We are humans in this life
because of good abhisaṅkhāra cultivated in a previous life.
§ If we do bad (or apuñña) abhisaṅkhāra in this life, we may be born as animal or worse. If we
do good (or puñña) abhisaṅkhāra in this life, we may be born as devas, brahmas, or humans
again.
14. However, there in no birth in the 31 realms that can bring a permanent state of happiness. Any
deva or brahma existence will come to an end, and then one could be born in the apāyās.
§ Permanent state of happiness (which means absence of ANY suffering) is attained by stopping
this never-ending rebirth process. That is key message of the Buddha.
§ When one truly understands that, one has the “vision” of a Sotāpanna, i.e., one would have
gotten rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi (and vicikiccā and silabbata parāmāsa all at the same time).
15. More details can be found in the “Paṭicca Samuppāda” section. The “Living Dhamma” section
there is an attempt to provide a systematic approach to learn and practice Buddha Dhamma (of
course, with more details in other sections).
§ I have encountered an unexpected medical emergency (that is anicca nature, which is much
more than just impermanence). If I recover, I will be back in several weeks.
§ May you all attain Nibbāna!
Revised July 27, 2017; January 15, 2018; September 22, 2018; September 26, 2018; February 3,
2019; February 13, 2019
Here we discuss the difference between a Sotāpanna and one who is striving for the Sotāpanna stage
and is on the right path (a Sotāpanna Anugami).
1. The word saṅgha is used nowadays to refer to the bhikkhus. Yet saṅgha is “san” + “gha”, or those
who have either gotten rid or are successfully getting rid of ”san”, and by this definition, one does not
have to be a bhikkhu to belong to the saṅgha; see, “What is “San”?”.
In the salutation to the saṅgha, they are referred to as “attha purisa puggalā” (“attha” is eight,
“purisa” here does not mean male, but with higher virtues, and “puggalā” means person) or a person
with higher virtues. Thus there are eight types of people belonging to the saṅgha. Who are the eight?
§ There are four who have fulfilled the conditions for the four stages of Nibbāna: Sotāpanna,
Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, and Arahant. They are said to be in the magga stage for respective
stage. And there are four who have received the fruits (phala).
§ A special case of kamma and kamma vipāka happens for these Noble kamma: once “what
needs to be done” is fulfilled, the vipāka follow in the very next citta within a billionth of a
second.Thus when one gets into the Sotāpanna magga stage, for example, one receives the
Sotāpanna phala in the very next citta, and thus one becomes a Sotāpanna virtually at the same
time.
§ However, when one starts grasping the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta), one becomes a
Sotāpanna Anugami (one on the way to attain the Sotāpanna stage), and thus one becomes free
of the apāyas. In later commentaries, they are also called “Chula Sotāpanna” or a “junior
Sotāpanna“.
2. The citta vīthi for a magga phala is discussed at the end of the post, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of
Sense Inputs“:
B B B “BC BU MD P U A G Pa Fr Fr” B B B
(B) Upaccheda (Arrest Bhavaṅga), (MD) Manodvara Avajjana (Mind Averting), (P) Parikamma
(Preparation), (U) Upacara (Colse Proximity), (A) Anuloma (Conformity), (G) Gotrabu (Change of
Lineage), (Pa) Path (magga), and (Fr) Fruit (phala).
§ A Sotāpanna Anugāmi is getting closer to the “change of lineage” or G. The earlier stages of P,
U, A, may be reached gradually. Once that level of comprehension is complete, one makes that
transition (G), completes the lokuttara kamma, and immediately receives the phala.
§ In a strict sense, it may be better to call one a Sotāpanna Magga Anugāmi (one trying to get to
the magga citta) rather than Sotāpanna Anugāmi.
§ The eight Noble Persons (Ariyas) are listed in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Puggala
Sutta (AN 8.59)” and in “WebLink: suttacentral: Puggala Sutta (AN 9.9)“. In both suttas,
Sotāpanna Anugāmi is listed as “sotāpatti phala sacchikiriyāya paṭipanno“. One on the way to
become an Anāgāmi is listed as “anāgāmi phala sacchikiriyāya paṭipanno“, etc. In the second
sutta, a normal human is listed as “puthujjano“.
3. Thus it is clear that “attha purisa puggalā” consist of the eight Ariyas (Noble Persons): Sotāpanna
Anugāmi, Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī Anugāmi, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī Anugāmi, Anāgāmī, Arahant
Anugāmi, and Arahant.
§ The types of āsavas eliminated at each stage is discussed at, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal
of Āsavas“.
§ How lobha, dosa, moha, and also the ten fetters (sanyojana) are removed at each stage is
discussed at, “Relinquishing Defilements via Three Rounds and Four Stages“.
§ Both a Sotāpanna Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna would have “Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities
of a Sotāpanna“.
4. A Sotāpanna is someone who has seen Nibbāna, not the full Nibbāna, but a glimpse of it. One
becomes a Sotāpanna when one removes avijjā (ignorance) about the true status of affairs in “this
world of 31 realms”. With that understanding his/her mind is purified to an extent that will not allow
him/her to do an immoral act that could lead to a birth in the four lower worlds (apāyas). Not only
that, one will also not “latch onto” a kamma vipāka resulting from such an strong immoral act in the
past. Thus a Sotāpanna will never be born in an apāya again.
The other three stages have similar “demarcation thresholds”.
§ A Sakadāgāmī will be never again be born in the human or lower four realms. He/she can still
be born in the deva worlds (i.e., still could be born in kāma loka), but those devas do not have
“flesh and blood” bodies that lead to physical discomforts and diseases. In the deva lokas,
beings only have fine bodies that are not subject to old age and diseases.
§ An Anāgāmī has overcome any desire to be born anywhere in the kamaloka, i.e., the 11 lowest
realms. He/she has no kāma rāga (desire for sense pleasures) or paṭigha (hate).
§ An Arahant has no desire to be born anywhere in the 31 realms, and thus will never be reborn
“in this world”. He/she has attained full Nibbāna, full release.
5. One has to first hear the true message of the Buddha before one can fulfill the conditions to attain
the Sotāpanna magga stage, i.e., he/she needs to go beyond the mundane eightfold path; see,
“Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ In particular, a Sotāpanna anugāmi (or Sotāpanna magga anugāmika or Sotāpanna magga
anugāmi) has heard about anicca, dukkha, anatta (Tilakkhaṇa), or the “true nature of this
world with 31 realms” from a Noble person, and has grasped the basic idea.
§ This is why association with a “kalana mitta” or “Kalyāna Mitra” (basically a “Noble friend”,
i.e., an Ariya) is a pre-condition for attaining the Sotāpanna stage; see, “Four Conditions for
Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala“.
§ Once becoming a Sotāpanna anugāmi, one is a Noble Person (one of the attha purisa puggala),
and thus is free from the apāyās, see, “Sotāpanna Anugāmi – No More Births in the Apāyās“.
6. Let us take a simile to see what this “demarcation” between Sotāpanna magga anugāmi and a
Sotāpanna.
§ Suppose it is known that a very valuable treasure is at the peak of a mountain, but it is not
generally known where that mountain is. This is pretty much the status of Buddha Dhamma
today; most people know that it is valuable, but they do not know what the right version is, and
there are a lot of different versions.
§ As the Buddha said in his first sermon, “my Dhamma has not been known to the world before”.
Thus one needs a Buddha or a true disciple of Buddha to show him/her what Nibbāna is and
how to get to the Sotāpanna stage. This is an important and a critical point.
§ Suppose someone gets directions to the correct mountain with the treasure; then he/she knows
exactly which country to go to and which geographic location in that country the mountain is
located. This person is like one who is on the path to become a Sotāpanna, i.e, a Sotāpanna
magga anugāmi. He/she knows exactly where to go and has a detailed map. And he/she has to
get it from a Buddha or a true disciple of a Buddha who has at least seen the mountain (a
Sotāpanna), if not been to the top (an Arahant).
§ Now he/she makes the journey to country and to the region where the mountain is located. On
the way to there he/she can verify the landmarks given by the “friend” (an Ariya). Similarly, a
Sotāpanna magga anugami spends time contemplating the newly learned concepts of anicca,
dukkha, anatta, paṭicca samuppāda, etc.
§ Thus with confidence the person gets closer and closer to the mountain and some point starts
seeing the mountain. At that point, the person has “crossed the boundary” to become a
Sotāpanna. He/she has seen a glimpse of Nibbāna for the first time. Now he/she can complete
the journey without any help, even if the map is lost (i.e., even in a future life).
7. Going back to the simile of the mountain with treasure, different versions of “Buddhism”
correspond to identifying the mountain to be in different geographic locations, all over the world. So
different groups of people are making trips over long distances and with much effort to get to
different mountains. All these are in remote places and the journey is hard.
§ Obviously, a lot of people are wasting their time and effort by targeting a “wrong mountain”.
So, how does one know which “mountain” or version to pick? This is why it takes some effort
to weed out the wrong/inconsistent versions Buddha Dhamma; see, “Why is it Critical to Find
the Pure Buddha Dhamma?”.
8. In technical terms, one gets to the Sotāpanna magga/phala when one grasps anicca, dukkha, anatta
(the three characteristics of this world or Tilakkhaṇa) to a minimum level, where one begins to realize
that there is nothing in “this world” that can provide meaningful and unconditioned happiness.
§ When one comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta to the extent that one can “see” this concept,
one is said to have the “anuloma ñāṇa”; here, “anu” means “through the understanding of
Tilakkhaṇa”, “lo” means “craving for worldly things”, and “ma” means “removal”, and thus
“anuloma” means “removal of craving for worldly things to some extent via the comprehension
of Tilakkhaṇa”.
§ We came across “anu” also in “anupassanā“; see, “4. What do all these Different Meditation
Techniques Mean?“. In a previous post I also discussed how “lobha” comes from “lo” + “bha”
or “immersed in craving for worldly things”.
§ Thus it makes a huge difference if one incorrectly interprets anicca as “impermanence” and
anatta as “no-self”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
9. Let us discuss one way to contemplate on anicca, dukkha, anatta, using an example from this life
itself; it is easier to see it in lower four realms (apāyās) that are filled with suffering.
§ When one is young it seems like one can get anything one wants by working hard. But we all
have seen how our parents or grandparents or even famous people spent the old age suffering
with various ailments, and finally dying helplessly.
§ They may have “accomplished” many things. But they spent their whole lives working hard to
achieve those and then they have to leave it all behind.
§ One may have a beautiful body when young, but for how long? We can see how those old
movie stars age now. Some of them commit suicide because it is depressing to remember the
“good old days” when one had all the attention in the world, but now it all seem to be slipping
away.
§ This is anicca and anatta: no matter how much we try, whatever we gain in this world last only
a short time (in the sansāric time scale), and one becomes helpless in the long run. At some
point one realizes this and becomes distraught.
10. When one comprehends the true nature of this world, such sad thoughts do not arise. People who
follow the Path, and even those who have wisdom from previous lives (gathi) can take things in stride
and realize that “all things in this world” undergo this arising/destruction process without an
exception. That understanding itself leads to an ease of mind. A stronger version of this “ease of
mind” is the “anuloma shanthi” that one experiences when attaining the “anuloma
ñāṇa” (pronounced “anuloma gnana”).
§ The key to attaining the “anuloma ñāṇa” is to realize the fleeting nature of anything in this
world, i.e., a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). The next post discusses this.
11. With the “anuloma ñāṇa”, one realizes that getting rid of suffering permanently is not possible
anywhere in the 31 realms. The next step is to realize that it can be realized only by attaining
Nibbāna. By this time one has felt the nirāmisa sukha and thus one needs to cultivate, “etan santan
etan paneetan…”, the release one has felt, and the value of Nibbāna. Then one truly embarks on the
Noble Eightfold Path and is said to get to “sammatta niyāma“, and to Sotāpanna phala.
§ Therefore, it is critical to realize BOTH the unfruitful nature of this world with “anuloma
ñāna” AND to realize the value and cooling down due to Nibbāna, i.e., “sammatta niyāma“.
12. Thus it is critical to understand that Nibbāna is “nicca, sukha, attha“, after realizing that this
world is “anicca, dukkha, anatta“. A Sotāpanna has understood both.
§ Anything in this world (except nama gotta) is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), i.e., it comes
into being due to causes, stays in existence for a time, and then inevitably is destroyed. This
arising of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is called “udaya” in Pāli, and the destruction is called
“vaya”; thus “udayavaya ñāṇa” is the knowledge about that process.
§ Nibbāna is the only asankata; it is attained by removing all causes.
§ Many people have even attained the Arahanthood without actually having heard about
these terms like “udayavaya” or “anuloma”. Thus it is imperative to realize that just having
read about these concepts does not get one anywhere. One needs to “see” the Tilakkhaṇa or the
unfruitfulness of craving for saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (through saṅkhāra) by true
meditation or contemplation.
§ Thus a Sotāpanna has the udayavaya (sometimes called udayabbaya) ñāṇa; see, “Udayavaya
Ñāna“.
Next, “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala“, ………
6.4.6 Sotāpanna Anugāmi – No More Births in the Apāyās
A human who attains a magga phala will never be reborn in an apāya (one of the four lowest realms).
An Arahant will not be reborn in any realm. An Anāgāmī will be reborn only in a brahma realm. A
Sakadāgāmī only in deva realm. A Sotāpanna only in deva or human realm. It is not that clear
whether a Sotāpanna Anugāmi is also free of the apāyās. Here, we discuss the evidence from the
Tipiṭaka that is indeed the case.
Eight Types of Noble Persons
1. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Patipanna Sutta (SN 48.18)” describes the eight types of Noble
Persons:
“Pañcimāni, bhikkhave, indriyāni. Katamāni pañca? Saddhindriyaṃ … pe … paññindriyaṃ—imāni
kho, bhikkhave, pañcindriyāni. Imesaṃ kho, bhikkhave, pañcannaṃ indriyānaṃ samattā paripūrattā
arahaṃ hoti, tato mudutarehi arahattaphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno hoti, tato mudutarehi anāgāmī
hoti, tato mudutarehi anāgāmiphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno hoti, tato mudutarehi sakadāgāmī hoti,
tato mudutarehi sakadāgāmiphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno hoti, tato mudutarehi sotāpanno hoti,
tato mudutarehi sotāpattiphalasacchikiriyāya paṭipanno hoti. Yassa kho, bhikkhave, imāni
pañcindriyāni sabbena sabbaṃ sabbathā sabbaṃ natthi, tamahaṃ ‘bāhiro puthujjanapakkhe ṭhito’ti
vadāmī”ti.
Translated:
“Bhikkhus, there are five indriya (faculties): Saddhindriya, vīriyindriya, satindriya, samādhindriya,
paññindriya. One who has fully cultivated them is an Arahant. One who developed them less is an
Arahant Anugāmi. One who has even less is an Anāgāmī,.. Anāgāmī Anugāmī, ..Sakadāgāmī, …
Sakadāgāmī Anugāmi, …Sotāpanna, …Sotāpanna Anugāmi. Those who have not yet begun to
cultivate the five faculties are ignorant humans (puthujjanabhūmiṃ) who are unaware of the true
nature (Tilakkhaṇa).
§ One on the way to become an Anāgāmī is “anāgāmī phala sacchikiriyāya paṭipanno,” etc. One
on the way to become a Sotāpanna (or Sotāpanna Anugāmi) is “sotāpattiphalasacchikiriyāya
paṭipanno.”
§ The eight Noble Persons (Ariyas) are also listed in other suttas too including “WebLink:
suttacentral: Paṭhama Puggala Sutta (AN 8.59)” and in “WebLink: suttacentral: Puggala Sutta
(AN 9.9).”
Sotāpanna Anugāmi is Dhammānusārī or Saddhānusārī
2. An important way of classification of the Noble Persons (Ariyas) relevant to our topic is given in
the “WebLink: suttacentral: Tatiyasankhita Sutta (SN 48.14)”:
“Pañcimāni, bhikkhave, indriyāni. Katamāni pañca? Saddhindriyaṃ … pe … paññindriyaṃ—imāni
kho, bhikkhave, pañcindriyāni. Imesaṃ kho, bhikkhave, pañcannaṃ indriyānaṃ samattā paripūrattā
arahaṃ hoti, tato mudutarehi anāgāmī hoti, tato mudutarehi sakadāgāmī hoti, tato mudutarehi
sotāpanno hoti, tato mudutarehi dhammānusārī hoti, tato mudutarehi saddhānusārī hoti. Iti kho,
bhikkhave, paripūraṃ paripūrakārī ārādheti, padesaṃ padesakārī ārādheti. ‘Avañjhāni tvevāhaṃ,
bhikkhave, pañcindriyānī’ti vadāmī”ti.
Translated:
Translated:
“Bhikkhus, cakkhu is of anicca nature, will cease to exist and is subject to unexpected change
during its existence (same for sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, kāyo, mano).
– One who has conviction and belief that these phenomena are this way is called a faith-follower
(saddhānusārī). He/she is one who has entered the Noble plane (sammattaniyāmaṃ), has entered the
realm of Noble Persons (sappurisabhūmiṃ), transcended the realm of the humans who are unaware of
the true nature (puthujjanabhūmiṃ). He is incapable of doing any deed by which he might be reborn
in hell, in the animal womb, or in the realm of hungry ghosts. A saddhānusārī is incapable of dying
(separating) from that Noble birth until he realizes the Sotāpanna stage (and thus eventually
getting to the Arahant stage).
One who, after pondering with wisdom, has accepted that these phenomena are this way is called a
Dhamma-follower (dhammānusārī)… (The rest is the same as for a saddhānusārī).
One who knows and sees that these phenomena are this way is called a Sotāpanna. He is never again
to be born in the apāyās, headed for the Arahanthood.”
§ It is to be noted that 11 suttas (AN 25.1 through AN 25. 10) state the same in various ways.
5. Therefore, from the above suttas, we can make the following deductions:
§ A Sotāpanna is never again to be born in the apāyās and is headed for the Arahanthood.
first three samyojanā and weakening kāma rāga, paṭigha, and avijjā, he is a Once-returner
(Sakadāgāmī), who will return once more to this kāma loka. That man is entirely freed from
the apāyās.
(4). “Take the case of another man. He is endowed with unwavering devotion (avecca pasāda)
to the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Saṅgha. He has wisdom but not gained release. By
destroying three fetters, he is a Stream-Winner (Sotāpanna), not subject to rebirth in apāyās,
assured of Nibbāna. That man is entirely freed the apāyās.
(5). “Take the case of another man. He does not have unwavering devotion (avecca pasāda) to
the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Saṅgha. He has not yet gained wisdom and has not gained
release. But he has the following things to some extent: the faculty of faith, of energy, of
mindfulness, of concentration, of wisdom (saddhā indriya, viriya indriya, sati indriya,
samādhi indriya, paññā indriya). He understands with insight, at least moderately, dhamma
of the Tathāgata. That man does not go to the realm of hungry ghosts, to the downfall, to
the evil way, to states of woe.
(6). “Take the case of another man. He does not have unwavering devotion (avecca pasāda) to
the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Saṅgha. He is not joyous and swift in wisdom and has not
gained release. But he has the following things to some extent: the faculty of faith, of
energy, of mindfulness, of concentration, of wisdom (saddhā indriya, viriya indriya, sati
indriya, samādhi indriya, paññā indriya). He understands with insight, at least slightly,
dhamma of the Tathāgata.. He too will not go to the apāyās.
7. Note that in #6 above, for each of the four magga phala:
“Ayampi kho, mahānāma, puggalo parimutto nirayā parimutto tiracchānayoniyā parimutto
pettivisayā parimutto apāyaduggativinipātā.”
“..That man is entirely free… from the apāyās.”
§ For the last two types (Sotāpanna Anugāmi):
“Ayampi kho, mahānāma, puggalo agantā nirayaṃ agantā tiracchānayoniṃ agantā
pettivisayaṃ agantā apāyaṃ duggatiṃ vinipātaṃ.”
“..That man does not go to the apāyās”.
§ Taken together with the statements in the suttas discussed above, that definitely means the
following. A Sotāpanna Anugāmi is also effectively released permanently from the apāyās.
What is Avecca Pasāda?
8. A key phrase in many of the suttas is avecca pasāda. It is frequently translated as “unwavering
devotion” as in the above translation. But it has a deeper meaning.
§ Pasāda means a combination of “trust, faith, reverence.”
§ That comes when one understands the deeper meanings in Buddha Dhamma. In particular,
when one starts comprehending Tilakkhaṇa, one can begin to see the unfruitfulness AND
danger in trying to seek happiness in this world of 31 realms.
§ Then one starts losing cravings (“ava” + “icca”) for worldly things. We remember that
anicca is “na icca”; see, “Anicca – True Meaning.” [avecca :[adv.] certainly; definitely;
absolutely; perfectly; having known.]
§ Therefore, avecca pasāda or “unwavering faith” is connected to realizing the anicca nature or
the “unsatisfactory nature” of worldly things. That craving for worldly things leads to suffering
(dukkha). And that in the end that leads to one becoming helpless (anatta), especially when
born in the apāyās.
§ One establishes avecca pasāda or “unwavering faith” in the Buddha, Dhamma, and Saṅgha,
when one starts to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa.
A Sotāpanna, never again to be born in the apāyās, has acquired four qualities:
(1). He has avecca pasāda in the Buddha, i.e., he fully understands the following verse. “‘Itipi so
bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho vijjācaraṇasampanno sugato lokavidū anuttaro
purisadammasārathi satthā devamanussānaṃ buddho bhagavā’ti.”
(2). He has avecca pasāda in the Dhamma, i.e., he fully understands the verse. “Svākkhāto
bhagavatā dhammo sandiṭṭhiko akāliko ehipassiko opaneyyiko paccattaṃ veditabbo
viññūhī’ti.”
(3). He has avecca pasāda in the Saṅgha, i.e., he fully understands the following verse.
“Suppaṭipanno bhagavato sāvakasaṅgho, ujuppaṭipanno bhagavato sāvakasaṅgho,
ñāyappaṭipanno bhagavato sāvakasaṅgho, sāmīcippaṭipanno bhagavato sāvakasaṅgho,
yadidaṃ—cattāri purisayugāni aṭṭha purisapuggalā, esa bhagavato sāvakasaṅgho āhuneyyo
pāhuneyyo dakkhiṇeyyo añjalikaraṇīyo anuttaraṃ puññakkhettaṃ lokassā’ti.”
(4). He has the Ariyakantha sīla of the noble ones. It comes with penetrating wisdom and is
unbreakable. It leads to samādhi.’
“Ariyakantehi sīlehi samannāgato hoti akhaṇḍehi acchiddehi asabalehi akammāsehi
bhujissehi viññuppasatthehi aparāmaṭṭhehi samādhisaṃvattanikehi.”
“Ariyakantehi [with agreeable to the Ariyas] sīlehi [with ethical conduct] samannāgato
[endowed with] [endowed with noble’s ethical conduct] hoti akhaṇḍehi [unbroken]
acchiddehi [impeccable or faultless] asabalehi [spotless] akammāsehi [unmarred] bhujissehi
[liberating] viññuppasatthehi [praised by sensible people] aparāmaṭṭhehi [not mistaken]
samādhisaṃvattanikehi.”
10. We note that those first three verses are the same as those in the supreme qualities of the Buddha,
Dhamma, and Saṅgha; see, “Supreme Qualities of Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha.”
§ Therefore, those verses are not just recitation. They must be recited with UNDERSTANDING
before any serious mediation session.
§ From #4 and #5 above, we see that one gets a “Noble birth” when attaining the Sotāpanna
Anugāmi stage. A Sotāpanna Anugāmi is one of the “attha purisa puggalā.”
The four qualities of a Sotāpanna discussed in, “Sotāpatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a
Sotāpanna.”
Revised March 22, 2016; Revised on September 22, 2017, June 28, 2019
1. In many suttas, including WebLink: suttacentral: Sotāpattiphala Sutta (SN 55.55) and WebLink:
suttacentral: Dwitiya Sariputta Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya 55.5), the four requirements for someone to
attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna are stated: “Cattārome, bhikkhave, dhammā bhāvitā
bahulīkatā sotāpattiphalasacchikiriyāya saṃvattanti. Katame cattāro? Sappurisasaṃsevo,
saddhammassavanaṃ, yonisomanasikāro, dhammānudhammappaṭipatti“.
§ Association with “sappurisa (sath + purisa or “Noble friend”, i.e., an Ariya)”, sometimes called
a “Kalyana Mitra”.
§ Listening to Dhamma discourses (while reading is enough to get to Sotāpanna Anugāmi stage,
listening is necessary to attain the Sotāpanna stage, see #3 below).
§ Act with Yoniso manasikāra (basic idea of anicca, dukkha, anatta and paṭicca samuppāda).
§ Dhammanudhamma patipadā (following the Noble Path, which is beyond the mundane path;
see, “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
When someone starts fulfilling the above conditions one becomes a Sotāpanna magga anugāmi (or
Sotāpanna magga anugāmika); see, “Sotāpanna Magga Anugāmi and a Sotāpanna“.
§ During this process, one removes three of the ten sanyojana (or samyojana or fetters). The
ten fetters are those that bind one to the cycle of rebirth; see, “Relinquishing Defilements via
Three Rounds and Four Stages“.
2. First it is imperative to understand what was meant by the Buddha when he said, “my Dhamma has
not been known to the world” (other than during the time of another Buddha). Most people follow
what they deem to be “Buddhism”. In most cases, this is the version passed down from the previous
generation or the version that one read about in a book. I strongly advise reading the following posts
and spending some time thinking about this issue:
“What is Buddha Dhamma?“
“Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and the discussion at, “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
§ As discussed in those posts, one becomes a Sotāpanna magga anugāmi after making progress
on the mundane (lokiya) eightfold path. That is when one really embarks on the Noble
Eightfold Path.
§ As I tried to point out in many posts, when one is on the mundane path, one abstains from
immoral deeds out of fear of bad outcomes. But when one starts comprehending Tilakkhaṇa
(anicca, dukkha, anatta), one starts avoiding immoral deeds because one sees the futility of
such deeds: What is the point in hurting others in order to acquire sense pleasures that in the
end do not provide any lasting happiness?
3. September 22, 2017: Previously, I had stated that one could learn about Tilakkhaṇa by reading
these days. That is still true and one could become a Sotāpanna anugāmi by reading.
§ However, recently I came upon a desanā by the Waharaka Thero which stated that a Sotāpanna
anugāmi attains the Sotāpanna stage only while listening to a desanā by an Ariya (Noble
person, i.e., one with at least the Sotāpanna stage).
§ Apparently, a Sotadvāra citta vīthi of an Ariya (during a desanā) has the necessary javana
power to act as a trigger. I am trying to find a Tipiṭaka reference, and I would appreciate
receiving it from anyone who has that information. I will edit this post to include that reference
when I find it.
§ July 15, 2019: I still have not seen a definitive Tipitaka reference regarding this issue.
However, all suttas on the conditions for attaining Sōtapanna stage list saddhammassavanaṃ
§ Let us think of a forest where there are numerous climbers but only one tree and no other
supports such as sticks. The only way for a climber to “climb up”, and thus not destined to its
demise on the ground, is to get hold of that tree.
§ Only those climbers that are close to the tree can get hold of it and climb. But now others can
get hold of them and climb too. Thus, as more and more climbers start climbing, the “access
area” grows.
§ Therefore, if we can find a climber that is climbing up, we can ALWAYS trace it back to the
original tree. In the same way, an Ariya or a Noble person (a Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī,
Anāgāmī, or Arahant) can ALWAYS be traced back in lineage to the Buddha.
§ Because the message is unique, it has to come from the Buddha himself or someone who can be
traced back to the Buddha. One cannot attain even the Sotāpanna stage without hearing the true
message; if one has attained it, then he/she knows the message. Someone aspiring to become an
Ariya MUST hear the message from another Ariya; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
7. Now we can see the logic of the first two conditions. One has to learn Dhamma (the correct
version), AND thus it has to come from an Ariya (Noble) person.
§ The phrase “Kalyāna Mitra” is actually Sanskrit; in Pāli it is “kalana mittā” (pronounced
“miththā“), for “a friend who helps to remove defilements” (“kāla” is for “dirty” or “blackish”
as in “dirty water” and “na” is for “removing”).
§ Many people take “Kalyāna Mitra” to be a “good friend” in the conventional sense. But it is
being more than just “good”; one needs to know the message of the Buddha in order to convey
it to others.
§And of course one has listen to this correct message or read about it, and then GRASP it.
8. One time Ven. Ānanda, who was the personal assistant to the Buddha for many years at the end,
approached the Buddha and said, “Bhante (Venerable Sir), I have been thinking that the future of the
Buddha Sāsana (doctrine) must be dependent at least 50% on the kalana mittās”. [kalyāṇamitta]
§ The Buddha replied, “Ānanda, do not say that. The Buddha Sāsana will be dependent
100% on the kalana miththās”. Now we can see why. [WebLink: suttacentral: Saṃyutta
Nikāya 3.18 Good Friends - Kalyāṇamittasutta ]
§ If that lineage is broken, then that is the end of the Buddha Sāsana. The words may still be
there, but there will be no one to explain the true meanings of the key words, including anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ However, the Buddha has stated that his Buddha Sāsana will be there for 5000 years, so we are
only half-way through. Within that time there would be periods of “famine” where Ariyas will
be few in numbers. But there will also be times when Buddha Sāsana will shine with numerous
Ariyas in the world.
§ The key here is once-in-a-while, a “jāti Sotāpanna” is born who has fulfilled his pāramitas to
bring back the message of the Buddha, like Venerable Mahinda did about 600 years after the
Buddha. They are not only jāti Sotāpannas, but have the “patisambhidā ñāṇa” to figure out the
true meanings of key Pāli words, such as anicca, dukkha, anatta, and paṭicca samuppāda.
§ I believe this is such a time. It is still too early to discuss the details, but there many Ariyas in
Sri Lanka and even in other countries, thanks in large part to Waharaka Thero: “Parinibbāna of
Waharaka Thero“.
§ And there are many “climbers” all over the world who have already started “climbing up” with
the help of that established “climber”. I am encouraged by emails from many who are reading
this site, on the joy they feel in comprehending the “pure Dhamma”.
9. The third condition is to “act with yoniso manasikāra“. Here “yoni” means “origin”, “so” means
“oneself”, and “manasikāra” here means “with this in mind”.
§ In the Vibhangapakarana (Book 2, p. 234), ayoniso manasikāra has been described as
“perceiving anicca as nicca, dukkha as sukha, and anatta as atta“. Thus acting with yoniso
manasikāra requires comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ To state that very briefly, if one believes that there are things in this world that can provide
happiness in the long run, then one is acting with ayoniso manasikāra. To act with yoniso
manasikāra is to see the unfruitfulness of these struggles to attain something that is not
attainable, and thus to work diligently towards at least the Sotāpanna stage because this life is
so short.
§ But a more direct can be seen when one can see the “origins of various births or jathi” (i.e.,
rebirths). “Yoni” in Pāli and Sinhala means the birth canal; thus yoniso manasikāra means the
“understanding of origins”: One with yoniso manasikāra knows the causes that lead to births in
various realms, i.e., “bhava” and “jathi” are according to one’s gathi; see, “Gati to Bhava to
Jāti – Ours to Control“.
§ With that understanding, one will be motivated to cultivate “gathi” to be able to make good
decisions, either automatically, or at least by contemplating on it. In other words, one will be
able to make better judgements about morality, and to act with paññā (wisdom).
§ Even more importantly, one will be able to automatically avoid those deeds that can lead to
rebirth in the apāyas.
§ Thus “yoniso manasikāra” has a more deeper meaning than just “appropriate attention”. In
particular, a Sotāpanna comprehends “pati + icca” leads to “sama+uppada“; see, “Paṭicca
Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
10. When one is meeting the first three conditions, one is set to fulfill the fourth, “dhammanudhamma
patipadā“. Here “dhammanudhamma” is “dhamma + anu +Dhamma” where “anu” means
“according to”. The second “Dhamma” is the Buddha Dhamma; the first is the “dhamma” that one
follows. “Patipadā” is “procedure”. Thus it means following the procedures laid out in the true and
pure Buddha Dhamma.
§ When one learns the true Dhamma from an Ariya (Noble) person, one begins to comprehend:
(i). what is really meant by suffering (dukkha),
(ii). that suffering arises due to the anicca nature, and thus
(iii).one does not have any refuge anywhere in the 31 realms (anatta).
§ Then one realizes that in order to seek the only refuge (atta) of Nibbāna, one needs to act with
yoniso manasikāra and follow the “dhammanudhamma patipadā“.
§ In the series of four WebLink: suttacentral: Anudhamma Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya) (use the
arrows at the bottom to navigate to next 3 suttas), dhammanudhamma patipadā is described as
living with a clear vision of anicca, dukkha, anatta nature of the pañcakkhandha (rūpa, vedanā,
saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa).
11. As pointed out in “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma“, dhammanudhamma patipadā or the
“Dhamma Path” starts with mundane sammā diṭṭhi, or how to sort out immoral from moral. Then one
gets rid of the moha (deep delusion) that covers the mind, and the mind will be ready to grasp anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ When a “moral mind” is exposed to the true Dhamma, the second stage or the Sotāpanna
magga/phala results at some point.
12. Let us take an example to illustrate this concept.
One does not intentionally cut oneself, because one can see the dangers in that. In the same way,
moral people stay away from immoral acts because they can see the consequences of such immoral
acts.
§ But there are people who enjoy cutting themselves up (even though rare); they can be compared
to those who commit highly immoral acts because of their moha.
§ We can thus see why it is comparatively easy to get on the mundane eightfold path.
13. The lokuttara eightfold Path is harder to see. This is why a Buddha or someone who has learned
the message of the Buddha is needed to convey that.
§ If there is a party and people are enjoying good food and drinks that laced with poison. The
poison is deadly but it takes time to digest and bring out its bad effects. So everyone is enjoying
the food and having a good time.
§ And then someone comes and says, “this food is laced with poison, the more delicious the food
is more poisonous it is”.
§ Most people just ignore that message. They cannot comprehend why this person is “trying to
ruin the party”. But a few people ask for more information and try to find out whether what this
person is saying is true or not.
§ Like that it is hard for most people to take the “long term perspective” and investigate whether
it is really true that “it is not only fruitless, but also dangerous” to be attached to the sense
pleasures of this world.
14. It is hard in the beginning to grasp this message. Even when one starts seeing the message (as one
gets to the Sotāpanna magga anugāmi stage), initially it is hard to instill discipline. A good analogy
here is it is harder to resist scratching an itch, even though one may realize that it is not a good idea
because one will then make that a wound. The tendency is to “enjoy the scratching”. In the same way,
even when one starts seeing the dangers of the rebirth process, initially it is still hard to resist the
sense pleasures.
§ The solution is to “put some ointment in the itch to calm it down”; in the same way, one can
calm down the strong urges by reading/listening and contemplating Dhamma (thinking about
consequences).
§ And one should initially focus on the “big itches”, and not try to take care of all “minor itches”.
As one gets relief from the “major itches” one can see the benefits and is motivated to follow
the same procedure for other “itches” as well. Similarly, following the Path (especially the
Sotāpanna magga anugāmi stage) is a gradual process. One needs to tackle the “bigger
offenses” or get rid of the “worst habits (gathi)” first.
Of course, one needs to have removed micchā diṭṭhi in order to even become a Sotāpanna Anugāmi:
“Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
Next, “How Does One Know whether the Sotāpanna Stage is Reached?“, ………..
6.4.8 Sotāpatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna
July 8, 2018
1. Sotāpatti anga or the four qualities of a Sotāpanna are discussed in many suttas in the “Sotāpatti
Saṃyutta” of the Saṃyutta Nikāya and also in the Anguttara Nikāya. A few examples are: WebLink:
suttacentral: Brahmacariyogadha Sutta (SN 55.2), WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhamasāriputta Sutta
(SN 55. 4), WebLink: suttacentral: Veḷudvāreyya Sutta (SN 55.7), WebLink: suttacentral:
Paṭhamagiñjakāvasatha Sutta (SN 55. 8), WebLink: suttacentral: Nandiyasakka Sutta (SN 55.40),
WebLink: suttacentral: Gihi Sutta (AN 5.179).
§ I was surprised to see that these four qualities of a Sotāpanna have not been discussed much in
the current literature.
2. The four qualities (or characteristics) of a Sotāpanna — who has attained the Sotāpanna phala —
must not be confused with the four conditions that must be fulfilled to attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Those four conditions are discussed in, “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna
Magga/Phala“.
§ Those four conditions to attain the Sotāpanna stage are also called Sotāpatti anga sometimes;
see, for example, “WebLink: suttacentral: Dutiyasāriputta Sutta (SN 55.5)“. On the other hand,
the four qualities of a Sotāpanna are also listed as Sotāpatti anga in the WebLink: suttacentral:
Nandiyasakka Sutta (SN 55.40).
§ Therefore, one must pay attention to which context the term Sotāpatti anga is used: whether to
refer to the four conditions or the four qualities.
3. The four qualities of a Sotāpanna are stated succinctly in the WebLink: suttacentral:
Brahmacariyogadha Sutta (SN 55.2). The Buddha asks: “Catūhi, bhikkhave, dhammehi samannāgato
ariyasāvako sotāpanno hoti avinipātadhammo niyato sambodhiparāyaṇo. Katamehi catūhi?“
Translated: “Bhikkhus, the ariyasāvaka Sotāpanna, who is free of the apāyā, has four qualities.
Which four?”
Then the Buddha gives the answer: “Idha, bhikkhave, ariyasāvako buddhe aveccappasādena
samannāgato hoti: ‘itipi so bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho vijjācaraṇasampanno sugato
lokavidū anuttaro purisadammasārathi satthā devamanussānaṃ buddho bhagavā’ti. dhamme
aveccappasādena samannāgato hoti… pe … saṅghe aveccappasādena samannāgato hoti… pe …
ariyakantehi sīlehi samannāgato hoti akhaṇḍehi … pe … samādhisaṃvattanikehi. Imehi kho,
bhikkhave, catūhi dhammehi samannāgato ariyasāvako sotāpanno hoti avinipātadhammo niyato
sambodhiparāyaṇo”ti.
Translated: “A Sotāpanna has reverence/faith (pasāda) in the Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha, that comes
via losing deep-rooted cravings for things in this world (avecca). He is thus established in the
ariyakānta sīla (moral conduct of the Noble Persons) that cannot be broken to make him/her do
apāyagāmi actions (kamma). These are the four qualities or defining characteristics of a Sotāpanna
who is a free of the apāyā”.
§ First, we note that the “Supreme Qualities of Buddha, Dhamma, Sangha” are listed in this sutta.
Only the nine qualities of the Buddha are listed above in red. In the full sutta, the qualities of
the Dhamma and Saṅgha are also fully listed.
4. In order to fully understand this description of a Sotāpanna, we need to understand the meanings of
two key words: aveccappasāda and ariyakānta sīla.
§ I have not seen aveccappasāda discussed in English texts; where it is mentioned, it is described
as “unwavering confidence”. But the reason for that unwavering confidence is itself hidden in
that word. This is called “pada nirukti“, i.e., the meaning of the word is in the word itself.
Let us discuss that hidden meaning now.
5. Humans — who are not yet Ariyās — highly value the sense pleasures. Most are even willing to do
immoral actions in order to get more sense pleasures. Even those “moral people” are addicted to
enjoying sense pleasures that are attainable by moral means without hurting others.
§ However, that “moral conduct” is not guaranteed to hold. Even the most moral person WILL
BE tempted to do an apāyagāmi action under sufficiently “enticing” or “tempting” conditions.
When such a strong sense input (temptation) comes, one who has not comprehended
Tilakkhaṇa (in particular the anicca nature) WILL commit an apāyagāmi action at some point
(in a future life, if not in this life).
§ This is why all of us have not been able to escape the samsaric journey or the suffering-
filled rebirth process up to now.
§ This is hard for many to even believe. They think their morality cannot be “broken”. However,
every now and then we hear such “moral people” committing heinous acts that we never
thought they were capable of. The “unbreakable morality” can be attained only by seeing the
unfruitfulness/dangers in sense pleasures.
§ This is the uniqueness of Buddha Dhamma: It is possible to make one’s mind to NEVER
commit an apāyagāmi action (at the Sotāpanna stage), and to NEVER commit a single dasa
akusala at the Arahant stage.
6. Furthermore, without a Buddha explaining to us, it will be impossible to comprehend the wide-
spread suffering in the wider world of 31 realms by ourselves.
§ How many of us have watched (and enjoyed) television programs where a deer is eaten alive by
a tiger? How painful is that experience for the deer? How much pain a fish will feel tangling by
a hook that pierced its mouth and also not being able to breathe?
§ The problem is that our minds are programmed to think that animals are not living beings who
can feel pain. But ALL living beings experience pain as well as perception (recognition) and
many other mental qualities that we do.
§ In the Abhidhamma language, feelings (vedanā), perception (saññā) are UNIVERSAL mental
factors (cetsika) that arise with ALL thoughts of ANY living being.
§ Suffering is everywhere. If we pay attention, we can see so much suffering even among
humans. It is just that we are not aware of much of the suffering in the wider world of the 31
realms. There is unimaginable suffering in the other three lowest realms in addition to the
animal realm.
7. However, the reasons (or causes) for such suffering cannot be really understood without
investigating (and then be convinced of ) the laws of kamma that REQUIRES the rebirth process.
§ This is why one cannot really comprehend the deeper aspects of Buddha Dhamma without first
getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi or the wrong views about this world of 31 realms.
§ One who has not removed the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi will have avijjā at the highest level,
which is called moha. Therefore, even a prestigious scientist can have moha; it has nothing to
do with “book knowledge”. When one gets rids of those, one gets down to the avijjā level; see,
“Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“.
8. Once getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi, one can start to “see” (not with eyes, but with
wisdom) that the real cause for suffering is taṇhā (getting attached) that arise due to iccā (our
liking for sense pleasures). Furthermore, taṇhā has origins in “iccā” or cravings.
§ Again, this is the uniqueness of Buddha Dhamma. Whereas a normal human cannot imagine a
“happy existence” without sense pleasures, an Ariyā sees the opposite: unfruitfulness and
dangers in sense pleasures.
§ The key to comprehending the dukkha sacca (First Noble Truth) and Tilakkhaṇa is to see
the suffering that is hidden sense pleasures. The worst kind of suffering arises when one
does immoral things to access sense pleasures; that is what a Sotāpanna first realizes.
9. When one starts to realize the truth at the Sotāpanna Anugāmi stage, one starts experiencing a
different kind of “happiness”, which is the nirāmisa sukha.
§ The real cause of this nirāmisa sukha is the abstinence from sense pleasures. Again, this is
hard to explain, and needs to be experienced.
§ With that comes the realization of the value of a Buddha, and an unbreakable faith in him and a
reverence for him. This is called aveccappasāda in the Buddha.
10. Now we can see the true meaning of aveccappasāda: “ava” means to overcome, iccā is liking or
craving. These two words, when combined, rhyme as “avecca”. Now, “pasāda” is reverence/faith.
When the two words “avecca” and “pasāda” are combined, it rhymes as “aveccappasāda”.
§ It must be a truly exceptional person to discover such an unimaginable cause for the suffering
in this world, and to find the way out of that suffering (by removing taṇhā or”iccā” for worldly
pleasures).
§ This unbreakable faith/reverence for the Buddha — that comes from comprehending the
dangers of “iccā” for worldly pleasures — is called“Buddhe aveccappasāda“.
11. Of course, one will simultaneously have “Dhamme aveccappasāda”, an unshakeable faith in the
Dhamma, the teachings of the Buddha, that allowed one to be free of the apāyas.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
764 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Furthermore, one will not be able to learn this unique Dhamma of the Buddha without the
Saṅgha, those Ariyās who have transmitted the true and pure Dhamma up to now. One could
spend a lifetime learning “fake Dhamma”, and will not be able to grasp the message of the
Buddha. We are fortunate to be learn the correct Buddha Dhamma, only because of the Saṅgha,
who have faithfully and correctly transmitted the Tipiṭaka over all these years.
§ That realization leads to “Sanghe aveccappasāda”, reverence/faith in the Saṅgha.
§ It is important to note that bhikkhus are not necessarily included in the Saṅgha. Only those
eight Noble Persons (attha purisa puggala) are included in Saṅgha; see, “Supreme Qualities of
Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha“.
§ However, bhikkhus should always be treated with respect. They represent the Buddha Sāsana.
As I understand, even a lay Ānāgāmi should bow to any bhikkhu.
12. Finally, now one’s moral conduct is unbreakable FOREVER, even though future births. No
matter how tempting the external sense input is, one will NEVER do an apāyagāmi action (kamma).
§ This unbreakable moral conduct of a Sotāpanna is called “ariyakānta sīla“. Kānta (“ka”
+”anta“) is the “cooled mindset” achieved via removing the two extremes (“anta“) the Buddha
rejected: excess sense pleasures and excess hardship or extreme austerity.
§ Ariyakānta sīla is established only in Ariyās who have comprehended this unique message of
the Buddha, about how suffering arises in this wider world of 31 realms and how that future
suffering can be stopped and a permanent state without suffering (Nibbāna) can be attained.
13. This is the “unique vision” or Sammā Diṭṭhi in the Noble Eightfold Path. A Sotāpanna is able to
see the truth of this “previously unheard” Dhamma.
§ Thus, when a Sotāpanna comprehends this “hidden truth” about the real nature of this world,
he/she will begin to see the danger in getting attached to sense pleasures (however, a
Sotāpanna will not be able to stay away from normal sense pleasures; only the correct vision
about the dangers in sense pleasures is registered).
§ That “drastic change in vision” will automatically generate faith and reverence in the Buddha,
Dhamma, and the Saṅgha, thereby generating aveccappasāda for them.
§ This is why the Buddha, Dhamma, and the Saṅgha are called the Triple Gems, and are worthy
of homage; see, “Supreme Qualities of Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha“. We will discuss this in the
next post.
6.4.9 Sammā Diṭṭhi – Realization, Not Memorization
1. Sammā Diṭṭhi (or comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa) is the necessary first step to start on the Noble
Eightfold Path. If one has gained Sammā Diṭṭhi (i.e., if one is a Sotāpanna/Sotāpanna Anugāmi), one
would have understood the Four Noble Truths and can “see” (not with eyes, but with paññā) the path
to Nibbāna:
§ One has “seen” that there would be much suffering in future lives (especially in the apāyās), if
one gets too much attached to worldly things by assuming that they can provide lasting
happiness (this is the comprehension of the anicca nature).
§ The reason for such future suffering is immoral actions, speech, and conscious thinking (kāya
and vacī saṅkhāra done with ignorance or avijjā). This is why the first step in Paṭicca
Samuppāda is “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“.
§ That one can stop future suffering from arising by controlling one’s kāya and vacī saṅkhāra or
to stay away from dasa akusala.
§ And the way or path to accomplish that is the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Simultaneously, the 3 samyojana (sakkāya diṭṭhi, vicikiccā, silabbata parāmāsa) are also
removed.
§ We will discuss these in the next post.
§ They are all removed by the “right vision” and that removal is called “dassanena pahātabbā”
or “removal via right vision”.
7. The hardest part to understand is what is meant by “right vision”. We have discussed at length at
this website that it involves the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta): That one
cannot achieve long-lasting happiness by pursuing enticing things in this world, that one will be
subjected to suffering in the long run if one does that, and therefore, such an approach will lead to
one becoming helpless (especially when one is reborn in the apāyās).
§ That is the basic “right vision” that must REGISTER in one’s mind. The truth of that needs to
accepted by the mind.
§ Just reading about this, and memorizing it is not enough.
8. Let us take an example to illustrate this point. There are people who do not believe in rebirth. That
is a “wrong diṭṭhi” or “wrong vision” according to the Buddha. But if one’s mind does not see that
rebirth must be valid, just by reading about it is not going to change that impression in that mind.
§ One should look at the evidence for rebirth with an open mind; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
One should contemplate on the fact that nothing happens without causes, i.e., kammā will have
vipāka. That in turn leads to the conclusion that rebirth must be valid.
§ This is why getting rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi MUST happen before one can
comprehend Tilakkhaṇa and become Sotāpanna. This was discussed by the Buddha in the
“Mahā Chattārisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty)“.
9. One issue that I do not quite understand is there are some of those people who do not believe in
rebirth, but want to attain the Sotāpanna stage and even the Arahant stage! They don’t realize the
contradiction?
§ By definition, one wants to attain the Sotāpanna stage in order to avoid births in the apāyās. So,
if one does not believe in rebirth, why does one believe that it is possible to be born in the
apāyās?
§ We must also remember that even those of us who believe in rebirth, have been in this rebirth
for a time which has no traceable beginning. Therefore, we must have also held such wrong
views in the past. It is not easy to get rid of these 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi.
10. In any case, we still need to have more clarification on what happens when one truly
comprehends Tilakkhaṇa.
§ I think one good analogy is if one is wearing — say a blue-tinted glasses — all the time, then
no matter how hard one tries, one WILL see the world see white objects as blue and other
objects also distorted to appear with different colors.
§ Removing a diṭṭhi (or wrong vision) is like taking off those tinted glasses. It happens when
one’s mind comes to a certain stage of understanding. This is cultivating paññā (wisdom).
§ The only way to remove those “tinted glasses” is to contemplate on the teachings of the
Buddha, and also to engage in puñña/kusala kammā that provide the conditions for the mind to
comprehend those teachings.
11. A key factor that most people disregard is how much of a difference it can make in one’s mindset
when one stays away from dasa akusala and engages actively in kusala/puñña kammā. One’s mind
becomes clear and sharp, one will be able to comprehend deeper concepts easily; see, “Kusala and
Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa Kamma“.
§ Then one will be able to get to get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi and then make the
transition to the Noble Path by starting to comprehend Tilakkhaṇa; see, “Sīla, Samādhi, Paññā
to Paññā, sīla, Samādhi”.
· Comprehending Tilakkhaṇa is different than learning mundane subjects like geometry or even
mathematics. It can be difficult or relatively easier depending on how much
“preparations” (dana, sīla, bhāvanā) one has made in this life and also in previous lives; see,
“Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā” and “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa
Kamma“.
12. As we discussed above, the key step in getting to the “right view” is for one’s mind to see the
truth in the world view of the Buddha: That our world is much more complex than what we
experience with our senses. That there are more realms of existence, that suffering is worst in
those apāyās, and that unless we get rid of “apāyagāmi gati” one can end up in the apāyās.
§Those “apāyagāmi gati” are closely related to diṭṭhāsava, which arise and accumulate due to
ignorance of the Buddha’s world view or the real nature of the world (Tilakkhaṇa).
§ Furthermore, at the dying moment the mind can grasp such an apāyagāmi sense input
(arammana).
§ As we have discussed before, those things happen AUTOMATICALLY, based on one’s gati
(āsava). That is the important point to understand. Unless one is a Sotāpanna, those
possibilities cannot be ruled out.
13. Another related key issue is not how many bad kammā beeja one has accumulated (some of
which accumulated in previous lives and we are not even aware of them). Rather what is important is
whether one’s mind will grasp a bhava (upādāna) in a given realm. That depends only on the level of
paññā (wisdom) that one has cultivated and THEREFORE what kind of gati one has removed.
§ It DOES NOT matter how many kammā beeja suitable to give rebirth in the apāyās are
there. If one has removed “apāyagāmi gati” by cultivating paññā to the Sotāpanna stage,
then one’s mind would not grasp such bhava.
§ If one’s mind has removed all gati that can lead to rebirth in any realm, then one’s mind would
not be able to grasp any bhava, and thus one would attain Parinibbāna at the dying moment.
§ For example, Angulimāla killed 999 people, but was able to attain the Arahanthood within a
week or so. Those bad kammā beeja were still there, but his mind would not grasp (upādāna)
them.
14. When one gets to Sammā Diṭṭhi (i.e., when one becomes at least a Sotāpanna Anugāmi), one’s
gati have changed permanently. Since the next birth is according to one’s gati, one will not be born
into a family with micchā diṭṭhi. This is how it is guaranteed that one will have only 7 more bhava
left.
§ One may grasp Tilakkhaṇa by focusing on one of them. But that will lead to comprehension of
all three, and even more characteristics like the asubha (unfruitful) nature. They are all inter-
related.
§ Of course, there are different levels of Sammā Diṭṭhi and it will be completed only at the
Arahant stage.
15. Finally, there is no need to worry about whether one has attained a certain stage of Nibbāna. One
should concentrate on following the Path. The Buddha said that if one follows Satipaṭṭhāna, one
would attain at the least Anāgāmī stage within seven years (some earlier), if one has a tihetuka
paṭisandhi.
§ If one does not have a tihetuka paṭisandhi, the effort will not go waste, but will help attain
Nibbāna in a future life.
§ He said that if a framer plants seeds and takes good care of those plants, they will provide a
good harvest. It is pointless to check each and every day to see whether the harvest is ready. It
will happen in due time.
6.4.10 How Does One Know whether the Sotāpanna Stage is Reached?
Revised March 23, 2017; May 15, 2018; September 22, 2018; August 12, 2019
One can determine for oneself whether one has attained the Sotāpanna stage. It becomes clear to
oneself that one has removed the characteristics (gati) suitable to be born in the four lowest realms
(apāyas).
1. The most precious thing sought by a Bhauddhayā (or a practicing Buddhist) is the Sotāpanna stage
of Nibbāna; see, “Why a Sotāpanna is better off than any King, Emperor, or a Billionaire.”
§ It is the Arahanthood that is the ultimate goal. A Sotāpanna will become an Arahanthood
within seven bhava.
§ (That is many more than seven births; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein”).
§ Thus it is essential to know how to figure out whether one has attained that stage. Other than
that person himself/herself, only a Buddha can say whether a given person has achieved magga
phala; see, “Myths about the Sotāpanna Stage.”
§ As we discussed in that post, even Ven. Sariputta (who is only second to the Buddha in
Dhamma knowledge) could not do that. Some people today claim they know whether another
person has attained the Sotāpanna stage (and make money doing that).
2. A Sotāpanna is one who has seen the way to Nibbāna. He/she still has more work to do, but can
see a glimpse of Nibbāna from far. The way to Nibbāna has become apparent.
§ In another post, I described a simile. A traveler, who, looking for particular mountain to get to
the top of it, can finally see an outline of it at a distance. He/she still has to travel to the base of
the mountain and climb up. Most of the hard work was to find the location of that mountain and
to get close to it. See, “Sotāpanna Anugami and a Sotāpanna” and “The Sotāpanna Stage.”
3. In the Buddha Dhamma, the ultimate goal is to stop the rebirth process anywhere in the 31 realms
of this world. That corresponds to realizing that there is only suffering to be had by staying in this
rebirth process. In particular, one has to comprehend the dangers of the rebirths in the lowest four
realms.
§ The ONLY WAY to come to this realization is to comprehend the true nature of this world of
31 realms: anicca, dukkha, anatta. And that is NOT impermanence, suffering, and “no-self”;
see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations.”
§ Instead, it is to realize the unfruitfulness of striving to reach the mirage of happiness in this
world of 31 realms, and thus convince oneself that one is truly helpless in this cycle of rebirths.
§ Therefore, one must work diligently to stop future suffering by “giving up the cravings for
anything in this world” and strive to reach the only oasis in this desert of the cycle of rebirths or
Nibbāna. That is to release the mind from the burdens of the material world.
4. Once that idea sinks in, one’s attitude, behavior, and outlook on life will change forever.
§ Let us take an example. Once a child learns the way to add two numbers, there is no way that
the child will ever forget that. There will be no second guessing. If an adult, even a teacher,
tells that child that “two plus three is six”, there is no way that that child will ever agree to that.
§ Attaining the Sotāpanna stage is like that. Deep down, one will KNOW the dangers of the
rebirth process. That any happiness whether due to health, wealth, or fame, is of NO VALUE in
the long term. He/she has truly understood the value of the Buddha Dhamma, and that faith
(based on understanding) will prevail through future rebirths.
§ That is not a “magical effect.” A living being is a continuous flow of kammic energy; see,
“What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream.” Thus what happens at the Sotāpanna phala
moment is to change the “gathi” of that lifestream irrevocably. One would have permanently
shed any “gathi” suitable for a hell-being (with gathi of strong hate), a peta (intense
greed), an asura (freeloading mentality), or an animal (a mixture all those; “thirisan” or
all three “san“).
§ One way to assess is to see how much of one such “gati” have changed for the better. (Over the
time period that one has started working towards the Sotāpanna stage). One should be able to
see significant changes. For discussions on “gati”, (or “gathi”), please use the “Search” box on
top right.
5. Let us take another example. When we look in a mirror and see our image, we KNOW that it is not
another person or oneself, but merely a image. We don’t need to think twice to realize that.
§ But have you seen a dog barking at its reflection in a mirror or in water? A dog thinks it is
another dog, and barks at it. A dog would not know the reality of a reflection.
§ In the same way, an average human thinks very highly of his/her material wealth. One is
willing to “do whatever it takes” to achieve such material things, titles, recognitions, etc.
§ But a Sotāpanna would instinctively know the unfruitfulness of such struggles. He/she may still
be enjoy sense pleasures (and thus may still likes to eat tasty food or engage in sexual activity,
for example). However he/she will not willingly go to extremes, such as engaging in sexual
misconduct having affairs outside the marriage or being excessively greedy.
§ A Sotāpanna has reduced lobha to kāma rāga and dosa (or dvesha) to paṭigha. In other words,
greed or hate that was due to total covering of mind by the five hindrances would be reduce to
“attachments” and “dislikes”; see, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā.”
§ The most important thing is that he/she will NEVER do any act that is immoral enough to lead
to rebirth in the lowest four realms. We all KNOW that our reflection in a mirror is not real and
thus will not try to talk to that reflection. Similarly, a Sotāpanna INSTINCTIVELY avoids
doing anything that is profoundly immoral. He/she does not need to think about consequences
of such acts, etc.
6. One could be a Sotāpanna (or even an Arahant) without being able to get to any jhāna beforehand.
Many people in the time of the Buddha attained the Arahanthood upon listening to a desanā.
Upacara and anuloma samādhi are sufficient for one to get to the Sotāpanna stage. Also, jhāna and
magga phala are two different things; see, “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala.”
§ That becomes clear when we look at the possible rebirths of a Sotāpanna. A Sotāpanna could
be reborn at or above the human realm.
§ But if one has attained the first anariya jhāna then one WILL be born in the Brahma realm.
Thus a Sotāpanna with even any anariya jhānas WILL NOT be reborn human.
§ A Sotāpanna can attain Ariya jhānas with practice.
§ By the way, if one is not a Sotāpanna but has attained anariya jhānas, he/she will also be born
in a Brahma realm. But the difference is that he/she is not free from rebirths in even the lowest
four realms.
§ What I described above is consistent with the extension of 89 cittas to 121. The “additional 40
cittas” come about when attaining the four stages of Nibbāna for people at various (anariya)
jhāna levels; see, “The 89 (121) Types of Citta.” However, these are technical details that may
not concern most people. I just wanted to show consistency.
7. We also need to keep in mind that the jhānas experience is the same for anariya jhānās as for
Ariya jhānās. We nee to keep in mind that jhānas are mental states of the rupavacara and
arupavacara realms; they still belong to this world of 31 planes.
§ There were yogis even before the Buddha who could attain anariya jhānas to the eighth and
also cultivated powerful abhiññā powers. Ceto vimutti (or ceto vimukthi) with anariya jhānas is
not the same as magga phala with paññā vimutti. In the former defilement are suppressed. In
the latter, they have been removed.
§ Of course, having even anariya jhānas makes it easier to do vipassanā (comprehend anicca,
dukkha, anatta) and attain magga phala.
§ Here is a desanā from the Waharaka Thero describing the difference between jhāna and magga
phala (it is in Sinhala, but I have extracted the essence in this post for others):
WebLink: Waharaka Thero - Difference between Magga Phala and Jhāna in Sinhala
§ The only concrete way to be convinced of the Sotāpanna stage is to make sure that the three
samyojana of sakkāya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, and silabbata paramasa are absent. See, “Sakkāya
Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?.”
8. Even before reaching the Sotāpanna stage, one will notice changes in one’s behavior and attitude
towards not only other humans but all living beings. All those will gradually change as one starts
following the Path.
§ But there will be significant changes after attaining the Sotāpanna stage. That change may not
be noticeable in a day. It could take weeks or a few months to see some critical differences in
one’s lifestyle when one looks back.
§ The tendency to get together with a lot of people will be reduce. One will be spending more and
more time learning Dhamma and contemplating on concepts that are still not entirely clear.
Finding more about the real nature of this world is immensely enjoyable.
§ One will also start noticing things that one had not noticed before. One will see clear instances
of people’s “self-induced” suffering as they try to enjoy life by “partying harder,” but only
getting exhausted in the process.
9. Then there is this question. Is it appropriate or even allowed by the Buddha for someone to declare
the magga phala one has attained?
§ What is stated in the Tipiṭaka is following. If one declares that one has certain magga phala
falsely intending to gain respect, money, publicity, etc., that is a bad kamma. A conventional
bhikkhu becomes “pārājika,” loses the priesthood automatically, and thus could be born in the
niraya for doing that.
§ Declaration of a magga phala is not banned. “A person attaining the Sotāpanna stage may
declare it if he/she wishes to do so.” in particular for the benefit of others. In the WebLink:
suttacentral: Mahā Parinibbāna Sutta (DN 16), “Katamo ca so, ānanda, dhammādāso
dhammapariyāyo, yena samannāgato ariyasāvako ākaṅkhamāno attanāva attānaṃ
byākareyya: ‘khīṇanirayomhi khīṇatiracchānayoni khīṇapettivisayo khīṇāpāyaduggativinipāto,
sotāpannohamasmi avinipātadhammo niyato sambodhiparāyaṇo’ti.”
§ Most people who attain magga phala do not declare it; it is not a bragging point. It is the same
with jhānas. Many people start off developing jhānas to attain supermundane (abhiññā)
powers, but once they get there, they have already seen the fruitlessness of even those powers.
§ In particular, when one develops abhiññā powers to be able to see previous lives, one become
so disgusted with what one (and others) had gone through in past lives. One does not seek to
look back much further.
10. Now let us discuss some episodes from the Tipiṭaka to clarify some of the points made above.
§ Visāka (one of the chief female lay disciples of the Buddha) had attained the Sotāpanna stage at
a young age. But she remained at that stage even without developing any jhānas or higher
magga phala until death at age 120. The Buddha stated that she would be reborn many times
(as I remember 11 times) as human.
§ Similarly, the wealthy businessman Anathapindika, who built the very beautiful and expensive
monastery Jetavanaramaya, attained the Sotāpanna stage upon hearing his first desanā from
the Buddha. He died and was reborn in the Tusita realm (one of the six deva worlds). Since
those deva worlds also belong to the kāma loka, it is clear that he never attained an Ariya jhāna.
§ Mahānāma was a wealthy person who was related to Prince Siddhartha’s family. The Buddha
told him that he had attained the Sotāpanna stage. However, when he was engaging in his
business activities, he often got frustrated and angry with his servants and yelled at them. After
such an episode of outburst, he would think, “if I am still able to become angry like this, I must
not have attained the Sotāpanna stage yet.” So, he would go to see the Buddha, explained what
happened, and ask whether the Buddha was sure about the declaration. He still had doubts
about his attainment of the Sotāpanna stage until the Buddha confirmed it for the third time;
see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭhama Mahānāma Sutta (SN 55.21).”
§ The key is that there is a difference between hate (dvesha) and getting angry (paṭigha);
paṭigha is removed only at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ Then there was the Sarakani brahmin, who also belonged to a “high caste.” He used to consume
alcohol and get drunk on a regularly. His relatives, who were vedic brahmins, disowned him
from their lot, saying that he was unworthy to be one of them. He also attained the Sotāpanna
stage, but could not give up the habit of drinking even after achieving that. When he died,
Mahānāma (mentioned above) asked the Buddha where Sarakani was reborn. The Buddha said
Sarakani had attained the Sotāpanna stage and has been reborn a deva. Sarakani’s relatives
laughed out loud contemptuously upon hearing this and declared, “if Sarakani was a
Sotāpanna, then we all should be Arahants.” When Mahānāma reported this back to the
Buddha, the Buddha said those ignorant brahmins would just go by outward appearances. That
is description is in the Sarakāni sutta (Do a Google search to fine several translations of
the sutta).
§ Of course, that episode does not imply that one could keep doing immoral activities and still
attain the Sotāpanna stage. What we need to understand is that drinking alcohol by itself is not
one of the dasa akusala (ten immoral actions), but heavy consumption could lead to it. Sarakāni
probably continued with his long-time habit to some extent, but was unlikely to have “got
drunk”. A Sotāpanna removes only strong greed (lobha). Kāma rāga or attachment to sense
pleasures is removed only at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ In the Mahanama sutta (delivered to Mahanama mentioned above), the Buddha described the
sīla (moral conduct) of a Sotāpanna: “panatipata pativirato hoti, adinnādāna pativirato hoti,
kamesu miccacara pativirato hoti, musāvāda pativirato hoti, surameraya majjapama dattana
pativirato hoti.” It is essential to realize the deep meanings of “five precepts”; see, “The Five
Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them.”
§ In the above “pativirato hoti” does not mean “will not” but rather “will not do with liking.”
After all, a Sotāpanna (unless had attained Ariya jhānas) is not yet released from the higher
realms of the kāma loka, only from the lowest four realms.
11. Some people try to remove the sense of “me” or sense of “self” to get to the Sotāpanna stage,
but that is removed only at the Arahant stage.
§ As long as one is bound to the 31 realms, a sense of “self” will be there. These “gathi” are
removed in stages, starting with “gathi” suitable for rebirth in the apāyas as discussed in
#4 above. Even an Anāgāmī has a sense of “self” left, though most of his/her attachments for
sense pleasure would not be there. One cannot pass a college exam without having graduated
from high school.
§ One has to advance systematically through stages; see, “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of
Āsavas” and “Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna.”
§ As long as one is bound to the 31 realms or “this material world,” it is not correct to say there is
a “self” or there is “no-self”; they are both wrong and extreme views; see, “Anicca, Dukkha,
Anatta.”
§ Any meditation with the wrong concepts of anicca, dukkha, anatta “will not grow.” One should
be able to “feel” one’s meditation “grow” if one is doing correct types of meditation; see, “13.
Kammattana (Recitations) for the Sotāpanna Stage.”
12. Finally, only a Buddha could discern whether another person has attained magga phala. However,
there are many instances of people declaring their attainments by themselves when that declaration
helped a noble purpose.
§ All those who participated in the first four Buddhist Councils (Dhamma Sangayana) were
Arahants, according the Tipiṭaka. Thus all those many thousands of Arahants who attended
those four Sangayana must have declared the Arahantship by themselves.
§ Ven. Ānanda attained the Arahantship just the night before the first Sangayana. He came to the
Council by air (with abhiññā powers) and entered the hall through the keyhole. He did that to
dispel any doubts from the minds of the other Arahants of his attainment.
§ There are only a relatively few instances of Arahants or even the Buddha performing such
supernormal acts. It was essential to remove any doubts of others about the Arahantship of Ven.
Ānanda because of the critical role he played at the First Sangayana.
Also see: “Sotāpanna Anugami and a Sotāpanna,” “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna
Magga/Phala,” and “Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna.”
6.4.11 Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana
October 1, 2017
6.4.11.
1
Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana – Introduction
November 1, 2017
1. This subsection replaces the old subsection, “Āsvāda (Mind-Made Pleasures), Ādeenava [ādīnava]
(Bad Outcomes), Nissarana (Relinquish)”. I had used Sinhala terms in that series, without realizing it.
Also, I have basically re-written some of the posts — including the Introduction — to have a logical
flow.
§ Furthermore, this subsection was under “Paṭicca Samuppāda“. I have now moved it to the
“Sotāpanna Stage” where it is more appropriate.
§ Here is the pronunciation of the three words: “WebLink: Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
2. There are two main categories of “pleasures” that one experiences: (i) Those arising due to kamma
vipāka, and (ii) mind-made “pleasures” where we keep generating more vacī saṅkhāra
(thinking/talking to ourselves in our minds) recalling such an experience of the first kind.
§ For example, eating a piece of cake that was given by a friend generates a “good feeling” via
the taste itself. That belongs to the first category. This is a kamma vipāka and there are “no new
kamma generated”; see, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka Viññāṇa“.
§ But if we get “attached to that taste” and start thinking how good it is and crave for more, now
we are generating vacī saṅkhāra (thinking/talking to ourselves about how good it is), then we
are generating “new kamma“. This second type is called assāda (āsvāda in Sinhala). [assāda :
[m.] taste; enjoyment; satisfaction.]
3. Therefore, assāda are basically “mind-made pleasures”, i.e., only those in the second category.
§ Those of the first type arise AUTOMATICALLY due to sense inputs. They arise due to our
kamma vipāka/gathi via mano saṅkhāra. Mano saṅkhāra are defined as vedanā, saññā which
arise in each and every citta.
§ Based on those initial feelings, we are also likely to start generating vacī saṅkhāra (talking to
ourselves, which is defined as vitakka/vicāra, then actual speech) and then even generate kāya
saṅkhāra (bodily actions). We HAVE CONTROL over vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, and that is the
key to changing our defiled gathi.
§ It is important to realize that vacī saṅkhāra are associated with speech and also “talking to
ourselves”: “Correct Meaning of Vacī Sankhara“.
4. There is nothing we can do to stop the first kind. For example, even an Arahant WILL feel the
“tastiness” of sugar or a nice meal (or saltiness of salt or unpleasantness of some medications/foods,
etc). But he/she WILL NOT become attached to that taste and crave for more.
§ It is this craving and the subsequent conscious thinking about it (vacī saṅkhāra) that is called
assāda, and that is what is bad because that will extend the saṃsāric journey filled with
suffering as we will discuss in detail in this subsection.
In the above example, one is likely to be matched with an “alcoholic mother” in the next birth,
and be born an alcoholic. [ādīnava:[m.] disadvantage. 過患 (danger), 患難 (trials and
tribulations), 過失 (negligence), 危難 (distress).]
7. This is another way to express the First Noble Truth. What a normal person thinks as
“somanassa” (“suva” + “manasa” or “good feelings in the mind”) CAN actually be the cause for
FUTURE suffering, but ONLY IF one gets attached, as discussed above.
§ Note the difference between consuming a tasty food and getting attached to it; seeing a nice
picture and getting attached to it; hearing a nice music and getting attached to it, etc.
§ Getting to that point of being able to experience “taste things” without getting attached to
them is not easy ; that is not attained fully until the Anāgāmī stage. It requires more learning
and contemplation (Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā).
§ However, to first get to the Sotāpanna stage, one needs at least to “see with wisdom” that
assāda do lead to ādīnava; when that understanding sinks in, that will prevent one from
committing apāyagāmi kamma, i.e., one’s mind will get rid of the coarse level of assāda.
This subsection can help gain that “vision”.
8. When one fully understands the bad consequences (ādīnava) of these mind-made pleasures
(assāda), that means one has understood the First Noble Truth as well as the causes for it, how to
eliminate those causes, and the way to do it, i.e., all four Noble Truths.
§ That leads to the cessation of saṃsāric journey and that is called nissarana (end of “carana” or
journey (“nis” + “charana”, which rhymes as “nissarana”). [nissaraṇa : (nt.) 1. going out;
departure; 2. escape.]
§ But it is a step-by-step process that starts with the Sotāpanna Anugāmi stage and culminates at
the Arahant stage.
9. It will take several posts to explain the above in detail. However, understanding them will help
with paṭicca samuppāda cycles and also with Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna bhāvanā.
§ The first few subsections of the “Living Dhamma“ section has all the fundamentals that are
needed to help understand this subsection. The posts mentioned in #3 and #4 are especially
important ones.
§ Assāda are related to āsava and anusaya too, as well as gati (or gathi) as we mentioned above.
There are many posts at the site on those key concepts, and a couple were listed in #4 above.
One could use the “Search” button on top right to locate relevant posts.
§ In the following we will discuss a couple of more examples of assāda, ādīnava and nissarana
in simple terms.
10. There are many things that we know which provide instant gratification, but are harmful in the
long term. A good example is smoking. A smoker gets an enjoyment with smoking. Furthermore,
he/she wants it to be repeated again and again, and that is assāda. But it has been proven without a
doubt that long-term smoking causes many health problems including cancer.
§ Even though smoking has decreased over the years, there are still many people who smoke. I
had a older friend who smoked heavily; I asked him why he would keep doing it since he knew
about the bad consequences. He said the habit had been ingrained and it was hard to break it.
This was many years ago, and he died because of his bad habit. The last several years of life
were spent in hospitals, with parts of his lungs removed piece-by-piece and eventually he was
on oxygen most of the time.
§ Of course he finally gave up smoking when he was about to be hospitalized. By the time he
clearly saw the “ādīnava” (when he actually experienced the bad consequences), it was too late.
The damage had been done.
11. However, his children clearly saw what he went through, and understood that smoking may
provide temporary enjoyment (assāda), but is bound to bring about bad consequences (ādīnava).
Thus they stayed away from smoking (nissarana).
§ This is the key point that we will prove to be valid for ANY sense pleasure at the end. But do
not worry; we do not have to (and cannot effectively) give up anything without understanding.
In fact such forced “giving up” will only lead to more stress. Our minds will automatically
avoid more and more “bad things” as we keep learning Dhamma.
§ There are few more “relatively easy to see” examples of “assāda, ādīnava, nissarana“, even
before we get to the deeper analysis in the next post.
§ Craving for tasty foods is another very clear example. Most of us cannot “see” the bad
consequences of overindulging in eating and as a consequence we have a obesity problem in
most countries. This has resulted in many health problems for each person who is engaging in
it, and also has led to increased health-care costs for all. Still many people are beginning to see
the truth of “assāda, ādīnava, nissarana” of overeating.
§ Heavy drinking, use of drugs, association with bad friends, are more such relatively “easy to
see” examples.
12. However, we can systematically understand the “root causes” for ALL such problems by using
the guidelines provided by the Buddha. Once we understand the actual root causes, at least some of
us can think through and avoid not only such “mundane problems”, but start seeing even more long-
term benefits: It is the same line of reasoning that eventually leads to the four stages of Nibbāna.
§ Thus even though Buddha Dhamma is focused on “eliminating the long-term suffering”, it can
also help reduce some of the “short-term suffering” too.
§ As a clear example of this, one can always examine the health of Buddhist monks. On average
they are much more healthier than the “householders” in any of the Buddhist countries. They do
not smoke and do not overeat.
§ And one can clearly see their “joy in heart” and the calmness of their minds even though they
have very few possessions and do not seek gratification in many sense pleasures that others
value so highly.
13. This last point is worth thinking about some more. If one thinks deep enough, one can see that
even some common “sense pleasures” are not that different from the pleasure one gets by inhaling a
drug. They give a highly enjoyable “burst of pleasure”, but inevitably lead to bad outcomes even
short term. One can get a hangover with a bad headache due to excess drinking, and in the case of
overeating one can feel the “discomfort” right away.
§ We seek such sense pleasures because we don’t realize the value of just having a calm, peaceful
state of mind. One does not understand the value of a “neutral mind” (which is called upekkhā),
unless one can experience it. It is like getting rid of a headache that one had for a long time. We
do not realize the “incessant stress” that is with us, until we reduce it.
§ Our minds are constantly under stress seeking sense pleasures. That is what we all had been
doing in countless previous births too. That is why it is hard to recognize any negative
consequences.
14. In the Sambhodhi Vagga of the Anguttara Nikāya, there are several suttas on assāda, ādīnava,
nissarana. The “WebLink: suttacentral: Pubbeva Sambodha Sutta (AN 3.103)“ provides a succinct
statement on what they are:
“..ko nu kho loke assādo, ko ādīnavo, kiṃ nissaraṇan’ti? Tassa mayhaṃ, bhikkhave, etadahosi: ‘yaṃ
kho lokam paṭicca uppajjati sukhaṃ somanassaṃ, ayaṃ loke assādo. Yaṃ loko anicco dukkho
vipariṇāmadhammo, ayaṃ loke ādīnavo. Yo loke chandarāgavinayo chandarāgappahānaṃ, idaṃ
loke nissaraṇan’ti..”.
Translated : “..What are assāda, ādīnava, and nissarana in this world? If one gets attached (paṭicca)
to sukha/somanassa that is assāda. That gives rise to dhamma (which are the seeds for future
suffering, because these are really “kamma seeds”) with anicca, dukkha, and viparināma nature, and
that is called ādīnava. Arising of such dhamma can be stopped by constraining the tendency to
indulge in sense pleasures (chandarāgavinayo), and thus getting rid of craving for sense pleasures
(chandarāgappahānaṃ)..”.
§ It is to be noted that sukha is “bodily pleasure” and somanassa is “mind pleasure”. We will
discuss this highly condensed verse in the upcoming posts.
§ In that sutta the Buddha says that he was unable to attain the Buddhahood until he realized the
need to see the dangers in sense attachments, and to work diligently to get rid of such cravings
for sense pleasures.
§ It is important to note that dhammā are really kamma seeds that lead to future vipāka; see,
“What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“ and “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis“.
12. There are many other suttas that discuss these three key concepts. In particular, “WebLink:
suttacentral: Assada Sutta (AN 6.112)“ is notable since it ties assāda diṭṭhi to anicca saññā:
““Tayome, bhikkhave, dhammā. Katame tayo? Assādadiṭṭhi, attānudiṭṭhi, micchādiṭṭhi. Ime kho,
bhikkhave, tayo dhammā. Imesaṃ kho, bhikkhave, tiṇṇaṃ dhammānaṃ pahānāya tayo dhammā
bhāvetabbā. Katame tayo? Assādadiṭṭhiyā pahānāya aniccasaññā bhāvetabbā, attānudiṭṭhiyā
pahānāya anattasaññā bhāvetabbā, micchādiṭṭhiyā pahānāya sammādiṭṭhi bhāvetabbā. Imesaṃ kho,
bhikkhave, tiṇṇaṃ dhammānaṃ pahānāya ime tayo dhammā bhāvetabbā”ti“.
§ Or, contemplation of anicca saññā leads to the removal of assāda diṭṭhi.
§ This is because the mind-made pleasures (assāda) are based on the wrong perception of nicca
saññā, i.e., that those sense experiences are real and fruitful.
6.4.11. How Perceived Pleasures (Assāda) lead to Dukkha
2
1. The essence of the Buddha Dhamma is that what we PERCEIVE to be enjoyment (āsvada)
(Assāda in Pāli) is actually the CAUSE of FUTURE SUFFERING; but that understanding
comes in stages. This is a subtle point to understand, and requires some cleansing of the mind to
“see”. Grasping the essence of Buddha Dhamma requires a concentrated mind.
§ At minimum one should read these posts when the mind is calm. That will make a huge
difference in comprehending Dhamma. Most people (especially those who come to this site) are
not “immoral”, but the state of mind can change. Even an excited mind cannot grasp deep
Dhamma. I discussed this in a few of my very first posts two years ago; see, for example, “The
Importance of Purifying the Mind“.
§ This is why I highly recommend everyone to read the first several posts in the meditation
section starting with “1. Introduction to Buddhist Meditation“.
§ Most people new to Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism), start at the wrong place: “Do I really need
to give up all these sense pleasures?”. The answer is no. One will voluntarily give up things
that one will be convinced to be dangerous or at least unfruitful. Nirāmisa sukha comes
from this understanding.
2. The key here is to understand that “bhava” and “jathi” are according to one’s gathi. That is
because “bhava” arises via “upādāna” and upādāna means what one likes or enjoys; see, “Paṭicca
Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ Bhava means “potential to bring about existence” and that existence is according what one
craves for (upādāna), not what one wishes for. Upādāna means things that one is
AUTOMATICALLY attracted to. At least the initial reaction is automatic, and that is what
counts at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment; see below.
§ If one craves for sensual pleasures in the kāma loka, then it is hard to avoid a bhava and jathi in
the kāma loka.
§ More importantly, if one is seeking sense pleasures and is willing to do things that can be done
only with “animal gathi“, “pretha gathi“, “asura gathi“, or “niraya gathi“, then no matter how
much one wishes, one cannot avoid birth in those realms.
§ One cannot fool one’s mind. One has to see the dangers in the lowest four realms to cultivate
the desire and drive to be free of them.
3. The four lowest realms are collectively called the “apāyas“. Those who are destined to go to apāya
have “dugathi“. The word “dugathi” comes from “du” + “gathi” or immoral habits (character).
§ On the other hand, those who have moral character have “sugathi“, which means good (“su“)
gathi.
§ Sometimes the apāyas themselves are also called dugathi, and the higher realms are called
sugathi.
§ A given person could have both sugathi as well as dugathi. One becomes the Sotāpanna when
the possibility for dugathi to surface (i.e., anusaya) is permanently removed.
4. It is hard to see the true anicca nature of the higher realms, i.e., in sugathi (for example in the deva
realm), until one is free of the lowest four realms. Most of us perceive deva realms to be full of
happiness. Until one’s mind is purified to at least the level of a Sotāpanna it is hard to comprehend
the futility of a birth in the deva realms.
§ But the animal and human realms have enough visible suffering for us to be motivated.
§ One cannot even imagine to comprehend the anicca nature of rūpa loka or arūpa loka until one
is free of kāma loka.
§ This is why COMPREHENDING Dhamma at each level is the essential. It is a step-by-step
process.
5. In the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana Sutta, the Buddha described three rounds of bondage
(tiprivattaya); see, “Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta“. Getting through those three walls is done via
four stages of Nibbāna (Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, Arahant).
§ At each stage, one gains wisdom (ñāṇa) to ” see further”, i.e., the anicca nature of higher
realms. Thus one has to make progress systematically. This process is analogous to the
following example. Let us visualize a person wearing glasses that have been covered with four
layers of a dark, but see-through, film. One could see through a single layer of the film, but
when all four layers are on, one is virtually blind.
§ A normal human without exposure to pure Dhamma is like a person wearing those glasses
covered with all four layers. He/she could just barely see the immediate surroundings, but not
much else. Such a person would only be concerned with the immediate surrounding, and will
not be able to see any dangers existing not too far away.
6. When exposed to Buddha Dhamma for the first time, it is like bringing in more light. Even with the
dark glasses, one can see a bit more clearly, and that is enough for most people to get interested and
learn more.
§ When one learns about the various aspects of Dhamma, one can see evidence that there is a
much bigger hidden world out there, and at some point one could comprehend the dangers of
rebirth in the apāyas. That stage can be compared to one layer of those dark films coming off. It
is the attainment of the Sotāpanna stage. This is a big step since pancanivarana (those five
factors that cover the mind) are permanently removed.
§ Now, one can see much better, and thus has the ability to start comprehending the dangers of
the higher realms in the kāma loka, i.e., the human realm and the deva realms. First one
comprehends the dangers of sense pleasures associated with the human realm and when that
happens one attains the Sakadāgāmī stage (one will never again be born in the human realm),
and the second film comes off.
§ In two more stages (Anāgāmī and Arahant), the remaining two films come off and one will be
able to clearly see the true nature of this world only at the Arahant stage.
§ Thus, it is useless to try to grasp everything at once or to try to give up “normal” sense
pleasures forcefully. However, it is imperative to give up those extreme (immoral) behaviors
(gathi) to be free from dugathi (apāyas).
7. The main problem is that some people go to extremes in seeking sense pleasures. They are willing
to steal, lie, and even commit murder to acquire wealth, status, or titles. All those are perceived to
lead to higher sense pleasures.
§ But in doing so, one will be cultivating gathi suitable for rebirth in the apāyas, i.e., dugathi.
§ One may enjoy such sense pleasures for maximum of 100 years or so. But when one is born in
the apāyas it is very difficult to get out. One could be trapped there for billions of years to
come. This is the danger that many do not see.
§ This is the difference a Buddha makes. In the absence of a Buddha in the world, humans are
unaware of the existence of these other 29 realms, and in particular, the four lowest realms.
8. Those akusala kamma that makes one to be eligible to be born in the apāyas have a special name:
pāpa kamma. I guess the closest English translation would be “akusala kamma of the worst kinds”.
§ As I have discussed in a previous post, there is a huge difference between lobha and rāga, dosa
and paṭigha, and moha and avijjā: “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“.
§ Pāpa kamma are done with lobha, dosa, and moha, the stronger versions of greed, hate, and
ignorance.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage one is left with the milder versions of rāga, paṭigha, and
avijjā. It basically means a Sotāpanna still likes to enjoy sense pleasures, but not at the expense
of others.
§ A Sotāpanna is inherently incapable of doing anything that normally would qualify one to be
born in the apāyas. Even under extreme pressure, a Sotāpanna would not be compelled to such
pāpa kamma.
9. I have done analyses to show that such pāpa kamma are done because one has micchā diṭṭhi. When
one has micchā diṭṭhi, one has the hidden ability (anusaya) to generate “diṭṭhi sampayutta citta” and
those are strongest of the 8 lobha citta; see, for example, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids
Apayagami Citta“.
§ Thus it is very important to understand what micchā diṭṭhi is. One can use the Search box to
find many relevant posts, but here is a simple explanation: “Wrong Views (Micchā Diṭṭhi) – A
Simpler Analysis“.
10. Another issue to think about is which factor dominates the determination of the next bhava and
thus jathi (birth): kamma vipāka (seeds) from the past OR one’s gathi right now.
§ We all have done both highly meritorious deeds and highly immoral deeds in the past. Those
cannot be eliminated easily. But the critical point is that unless one “willingly grasp” any one of
those kamma seeds at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment at the end of the current bhava, those kamma
seeds cannot bring about a new bhava.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one permanently loses “gathi suitable for the apāyas“,
i.e., one loses “upādāna” for bhava in the lowest four realms. Thus even though we may have
potent kamma seeds for such bhava, they CANNOT be grasped at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ At the Arahant stage, one loses “upādāna” for bhava in all 31 realms, even though he/she may
have even an uncountable number of kamma seeds from the past.
§ This is why Angulimala, who killed 999 people, was able to attain the Arahanthood within 7
days. He lost craving for rebirth anywhere in the 31 realms.
§ We just need to get rid of gathi suitable to be reborn in the lowest four realms to become a
Sotāpanna. That is the critical and first step.
11. To repeat: Avoiding immoral behavior and actively engaging in moral behavior is not only for the
prevention of creating bad kamma seeds or for creating good kamma seeds. In fact, we may have
uncountable number of both kinds of kamma seeds already from our past lives.
§ The more critical end result we are looking for is to change our mindset, our gathi. That starts
with first getting rid of dugathi. For most people, it is easy to see the dangers of the apāyas.
§ When we lose dugathi suitable for rebirth in the apāyas, we will not grasp such a bhava at the
cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ Until we lose both kinds of gathi at the Arahant stage, we NEED TO cultivate sugathi so that
we will grasp only such a “good bhava” at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
12. Once one gets rid of dugathi, one advances to the next stage automatically. It is hard to see the
bad consequences of “kāma gathi” (sense pleasures that keep one bound to kāma loka), until one is
free of the “apāya gathi” or dugathi.
§ In the same way, it is hard to see the anicca nature of “rūpa and arūpa loka gathi” (jhānic
pleasures that keep one bound to rūpa and arūpa loka), until one is free of the “kāma gathi“.
§ This is why it is totally useless to meditate on things like “there is no self” or “there is no
‘me’”. The feeling of a self (or more correctly the sanyojana of “māna“) is removed only at the
Arahant stage, which is infinitely far away compared to losing dugathi.
§ The perception of a “self” is going to be there as long as one craves for at least a trace of
anything in the 31 realms. This is another point that needs a lot of contemplation.
13. I may have given a somewhat wrong impression by saying that there is no point in meditating
until one learns anicca, dukkha, anatta. What I meant was that there is no point in meditating based
on the wrong concepts of anicca as “impermanence” and anatta as “no-self”.
§ Once one accepts the true meanings of anicca and anatta, one NEEDS TO start meditating on
those concepts in order to really grasp them. This is why the meditation section is important. To
get to that mindset, the Buddhist Chanting section could be helpful.
§ As I explained in the posts in the Meditation section, meditation should not be restricted to
formal, sitting down meditation. For example, one can contemplate on what we discussed
above during any free time (but not while driving!).
6.4.11. Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha
3
Introduction
1. It is very essential to understand the meaning of each term. The “defilement level” increases in the
given order from kāma guṇa to kāmaccanda.
§ Pronunciation of the terms: WebLink: Pronunciation of kāma guṇa to kāmaccanda
2. In kāma loka, we experience five types of physical sense inputs: pictures (rūpa rūpa), sounds,
smells, tastes, and body touches. There are inherent “qualities” for each of these called “kāma guṇa.”
Those are common to all of us in kāma loka. They also depend on “bhava” and thus differ from
humans to each type of animal; see below.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
780 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
[kāma : may denote:1.subjective sensuality, ‘sense-desire’; 2.objective sensuality, the five sense-
objects.
kāma-guṇa : ‘characteristics {cords (or strands)} of sensuality’.]
§ For example, all of us experience the sourness of lemon or sweetness of sugar (there may be
defects in some people due to kamma vipāka).
§ We all experience the unpleasantness of thunder or the pleasantness of music.
§ While there could be minor differences, all humans experience the same basic “qualities” or
‘kāma guṇa” through the five physical senses. Even when one becomes an Arahant, that will
not change.
Realms in Kāma Loka and Two Brahma Lokā
3. The 31 realms naturally exist to provide different levels of kamma vipāka according to the (abhi)
saṅkhāra done in previous lives (mainly in the human realm).
§ The lowest four realms in kāma loka (apāyas) have conditions that induce excessive suffering.
Higher two realms in kāma loka have rūpa rūpa, sadda, gandha, rasa, and pottabba that
provide increasingly higher levels of “pleasures.”
§ The rūpavācara brahma realms have rūpavācara jhānic pleasures; those brahmas had given up
kāma rāga and had cultivated rūpavācara jhānas in previous human lives.
§ Those in arūpavācara brahma realms had given up both kāma rāga and rūpa rāga, and had
cultivated arūpavācara jhāna in previous human lives.
§ That is why kāma guṇa is absent in both rūpavācara and arūpavācara brahma realms. Those
who are born in those realms had given up sense pleasures for jhānic pleasures.
What Are Kāma Guṇa?
4. Therefore, there are pleasing things in our kāma loka (human realm) that naturally arise to provide
sense pleasures according to abhisaṅkhāra that led to births there. We all had craved sense pleasures
in our previous lives but had cultivated strong puñña abhisaṅkhāra. Those who developed strong
apuñña abhisaṅkhāra (i.e., did immoral deeds to get such sense pleasures) are now in the apāyas.
§ Thus, as humans, we are naturally exposed to those “kāma guṇa.” We are naturally
“exposed to” sense objects that are “pleasing” to the five physical senses.
§ Thus, if one has not comprehended the Tilakkhaṇa then it is natural for one to get attached
to such “pleasurable things.” Then one perceives that things in this world — including those
things with kāma guṇa — can provide long-term happiness. But in reality, such cravings lead to
suffering because those “pleasures” are not sustained.
Kāma Rāga – Attachment to Kāma Guṇa via Saṅkappa Rāga
5. Now, if a person gets attached to those sensory inputs with kāma guṇa, and starts generating
sensual thoughts (i.e. vacī saṅkhāra) that leads to “kāma” or kāma rāga. Generating sensual
thoughts is also called saṅkappa rāga (creating saṅkappa that lead to saṃsāric journey). A sutta
reference is in #15 below.
§ When one engages in saṅkappa rāga (i.e., thinking greedy thoughts about such sense pleasures)
that is generating vacī saṅkhāra. One is then likely to initiate kāya saṅkhāra, too (start
engaging in related physical activities.)
§ That can happen to an average human. It can happen to a lesser extent to a Sotāpanna. That
next step of intentionally generating sensual thoughts happens with kāma rāga. That will again
reduce at the Sakadāgāmi stage and stopped only at the Anāgāmi stage. [kāma-rāga : ‘sensuous
lust’, one of the ten fetters (saṃyojana, q.v.)]
§ One cannot force the removal of kāma rāga. It will naturally go away when one changes
one’s gati by Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna.
6. An Anāgāmī has removed kāma rāga, but still has kāma, i.e., likes them somewhat.
§ However, kāma of an Anāgāmi is not strong enough to lead to rebirth in the kāma loka. In other
words, an Anāgāmī will not generate abhisaṅkhāra (strong saṅkhāra) for things with kāma
guṇa (for example would have no desire to engage in sex).
§ In the Abhidhammic language, an Anāgāmī has removed four greed-based cittas associated with
wrong views. There are still “four greed-based cittas dissociated with wrong views” left. But
they have lost much of the potency to move from kāma to kāma rāga level; see #3 of, “Akusala
Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta.”
§ It is only at the Arahant stage that kāma is absent completely.
10. The sight of such a woman is a kamma vipāka. For anyone (from an average person to an
Arahant), still living in the human realm will see that she is beautiful.
§ If one gets “interested” one generates kāma saṅkappa or vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning
of Vacī Saṅkhāra.” Then it could lead to kāya saṅkhāra, i.e., turn one’s head to looks at her
again with kāma rāga or kāmaccandha, that is a new kamma.
§ A Sotāpanna still has “kāma rāga anusaya” left in him, and that is why he/she will return to the
kāma loka. He/she can be born as a human or deva in the future.
§ A Sakadāgāmī is in between the Sotāpanna and Anāgāmī stages. He/she will be reborn only in
the deva realms.
§ Of course, an Anāgāmī will not be reborn anywhere in the kāma loka. since there is no kāma
rāga left.
Different Types of Kāma Guṇa for Different Existences
11. Anyone born in the human realm will have similar “kāma guṇa” because they had cultivated
corresponding “human saṅkhāra.” We all like same things, and any variations we do have are due the
variations in those main saṅkhāra types.
§ However, “kāma guṇa” of animals can be much more different compared to humans. There are
also many variations among animals.
§ Pigs eat very unpleasing things, including feces. Tigers or lions like to eat raw meat. Cows
don’t like meat but like grass. The variations are quite apparent. Again those correspond to
saṅkhāra that they had cultivated as humans. Furthermore, each bhava (and jāti)
corresponds to such saṅkhāra via paṭicca samuppāda. Some of you may be able to see that, but
we will discuss this later.
§ In brahma realms, things with kāma guṇa are absent. They were born in those realms because
they had preferred and cultivated jhānic pleasures, instead of craving for sensual pleasures.
12. In that regard, we just keep in mind for now that (abhi)saṅkhāra generated by humans have high
javana power, and thus lead to various “bhava” and jāti. Animals cannot generate such citta with
high javana power because of their unfortunate birth. That is an important point. Animals just pay for
past kamma until that kammic power is exhausted; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental
Power.”
§ Evenmost devas or brahmas “go with the flow,” i.e., enjoy their kāma or jhānic pleasures that
come with their birth, just as animals go through the suffering.
§ It is only those devas/brahmas that had become at least Sotāpanna that would be motivated to
strive for magga phala.
Only abhisaṅkhāra Lead to Future Rebirths
13. Therefore, it is mostly humans who can cultivate abhisaṅkhāra (of both types) and thus make
conditions for future “good births or bad births.” That is a critical point in the Agganna Sutta.
§ All the animals that we see were humans in the beginning. Those with “bad gathi” that had
been generated via “bad abhisaṅkhāra” in their deep past, were reborn as various types of
animals as the Earth evolved, and conditions for animal life appeared.
§ An introduction to Aggañña Sutta is at “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
§ Instead, one needs to contemplate on fact the the cause of future suffering is getting attached
to those pleasing sensual things. One needs to see the unfruitful (asubha) nature of those
things with kāma guṇa. Real asubha (detrimental) things are those eye-pleasing, ear-pleasing,
…body-pleasing things in this kāma loka. See, “How Perceived Pleasures (Assāda) lead to
Dukkha.”
§ Therefore, it is not even possible to do the asubha bhāvanā correctly until one gets to the
Sotāpanna stage. It is only then one begins to see the dangers in craving for sense pleasures.
§ However, it is always good to cut down on sense pleasures, even while striving for the
Sotāpanna stage. It makes one’s mind calm and susceptible to grasp more profound concepts.
§ Extreme sense pleasures are a burden to the mind. It is possible to avoid those right now; see,
“Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life.” Doing everything in moderation
naturally leads to a simpler, healthier, and peaceful life.
6.4.11. Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways
4
Revised September 4, 2016; Revised February 9, 2017; October 17, 2017; November 5, 2018
(Same at Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways
)
§ But based on all those, we can generate more types of “mind-made” vedanā called somanassa
and domanassa vedanā as we discuss in the next section below.
2. Kamma vipāka leading to sukha vedanā and dukha vedanā happen to everyone, including
Arahants. While everyone can live mindfully (taking necessary precautions) to avoid some of those
dukha vedanā, there are others that are too strong to be able to avoid.
§ For example, the Buddha himself had physical ailments later in his life as kamma vipāka.
Moggallana Thero was beaten to death because of a bad kamma that he committed many lives
before.
§ However, kamma vipāka are not certain to happen. Some can be reduced in power (see,
“Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“); all are reduced in power with time and some eventually die
out if they do not get a chance to come to fruition within 91 Mahā kalpas.
§ Many can be avoided by not providing conditions for them to arise, i.e., by acting with yoniso
manasikara or just common sense. For example, going out at night in a bad neighborhood is
providing fertile ground for past bad kamma vipāka to take place: We all have done
innumerable kamma (both good and bad) in past lives; if we act with common sense we can
suppress bad kamma vipāka and make conditions for good vipāka to arise.
Also see the discussion on kamma beeja in , “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“.
Now let us look at the “suffering we are initiating at present moment via saṅkhāra“.
(B) Vedanā Arising from Saṅkhāra (“Samphassa ja vedanā“)
We described the PS mechanism that generates this type of vedanā in the previous post. The vedanā
occurs due to attachment via greed or hate, at that moment (i.e., one’s gati); see, “Taṇhā – How We
Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
These are the vedanā (feelings) that Arahants do not feel. Since they do not have any “bad gati“, the
do not commit any (abhi)saṅkhāra, an Arahant avoids any kind of feeling arising from saṅkhāras.
The easiest way to explain this kind of vedanā is to give some examples:
1. Three people are walking down the street. One has ultra-right political bias (A), the second has
ultra-left bias (B), and the third is an Arahant who does not have special feelings for anyone
(C). They all see a famous politician hated by the political right coming their way. It is a given
that the sight of the politician causes A to have displeasure and B to have a pleasurable feeling.
On the other hand, the sight does not cause the Arahant to generate any pleasure or displeasure.
Even though all three see and identify the person, they generate different types of feelings.It
is important to realize that the feelings were created in A and B by themselves.
2. Two friends go looking for treasure and find a gem. They are both overjoyed. It looks quite
valuable and one person kills the other so that he can get all the money. Yet when he tries to
sell the “gem”, he finds out that it was not that valuable. His joy turns to sorrow in an instant.
Nothing had changed in the object. It was the same piece of colored rock. What has changed
was the perception of it.
3. What could happen if an Arahant found the same gem lying on the road? (he would not have
gone looking for one). He might think of donating it to a worthy cause. During the process, if
he found that it was not valuable, he would not have worried about it at all.
4. A loving couple had lived for many years without any problems and were happy to be together.
However, the husband slaps his wife during an argument (this is a kamma vipāka). The
physical pain from the slap itself did not last more than a few minutes. But for how long the
wife would suffer mentally? Those feelings arise due to saṅkhāra, i.e. sadness and of hate.
Even the husband, who did not feel any physical pain, would suffer for days if he really loved
his wife. In both cases, the real mental pain was associated with the attachment to each other.
The wife could have dropped something on her foot and would have suffered about the same
amount of physical pain. But she would not have had any lingering mental pain associated with
that.
5. In all the above cases, the initial sense contact was due to a kamma vipāka; there are no
kamma generated at that instant. However, based on that initial contact, we tend to pursue it
with our mind (thinking about good/bad aspects of the politician, the value of the gem, re-
assessing the love between husband and wife) and thus start generating kamma
automatically, within the same citta vitti; see, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka
Viññāṇa“.
Thus it is clear that in all the above examples, the “extra” happiness or suffering (other than due to
kamma vipāka) arose from within one’s own mind. And taṇhā (attachment via greed or hate) was
the cause of it.
We will discuss more examples as we proceed, but you should think about how to analyze situations
that you face everyday, or have experienced. Let us further analyze the actual words of the Buddha
when he described dukha in the Dhammacakka Pavattana Sutta:
1. It says, “jāti ‘pi dukkhā, jarā ‘pi dukkha, maranan ‘pi dukkha…….”. The deeper meaning is: “birth
is suffering, getting old is suffering, dying is suffering,….”; see, “Essence of Buddhism – In the First
Sutta“.
§ In order to grasp this deeper meaning, one needs to realize that in end. “all types of jāti“ lead to
suffering.
§ The most important point that the Buddha was trying to make in that sutta was that no matter
where one is reborn, that will eventually lead to suffering.
2. However, we can also see another meaning in a “day-to-day” sense: “jāti ‘pi dukkha” is shortened
for the verse; it is “jāti pi dukkha“ or “jāti api dukkha“ depending on the context; the other two
“jarā ‘pi dukkha, maranan ‘pi dukkha” are the same.
§ “pi” in Pāli or “priya” in Sinhala is “like”, and “api” in Pāli or “apriya” in Sinhala is dislike.
Thus, “jāti api dukkha” means “birth of something that is not liked by one causes suffering”.
“Jarā pi dukkha” means, “decay of something that is liked causes suffering”, and “maranan pi
dukkha” means, “Death of a liked causes suffering”. One can look at each case and easily see
which one to use; see #4 below.
3. The reverse is true too: “Birth of something that one likes causes happiness”, “decay of something
that is hated brings happiness” and “death of a hated person brings happiness”.
§ Y ou can think of any example and this is ALWAYS true. It brings happiness to many people to
hear about the destruction of a property of an enemy . Many people were happy to hear about
the death of Bin Laden, except his followers who became sad.
§ In the end, all types jāti eventually lead to dukkha. But that is a deeper point.
4. The Buddha further clarified “pi” and “api” in the next verse, where he explicitly said: “piyehi
vippayogo dukkho, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho” means “it brings sorrow when a loved one has to
depart, and it also brings sorrow to be with a hated person” (“piya” is same as “pi“, and “apiya” is
same as “api“).
§ We all know the truth of this first hand. When a man dies of in a plane crash, it causes great
suffering to his family; less to his distant relatives; even less to those who just know him
informally; and for someone at the other end of country who has had no association with him, it
is “just some news”.
5. Thus all these feelings arise due to taṇhā, some form of attachment: greed (craving, liking) or
hate (dislike); all these are due to mano saṅkhāra. The feelings (or rather the perceptions that give
rise to feelings) reside INSIDE oneself. It does not come from outside. We use external things to
CAUSE happiness or suffering by our own volition.
§ There is no inherent suffering or happiness in ANYTHING external; the sense contact with
an external thing CAUSES suffering or happiness depending on our gati and āsavas. An
Arahant, who has removed all āsavas, will be free of such emotional responses.
6. Now this DOES NOT MEAN we should not love our family or friends. These associations did not
come without a cause. We cannot eliminate the cause for the current life; it was done long ago. Now
we have fulfill the obligations that resulted from the cause in the past, i.e., we cannot give up our
families. We have families, children etc, BECAUSE we have debts to pay to each other; see,
“Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
§ What we need to do is to eliminate NEW causes: stop such relationships from formed in future
births, i.e., work to stop the rebirth process, while making sure to fulfill our obligations.
7. Here again, many people freak out: “how can I do that? if I do not reborn what happens to me?”
We have this mindset because we do not think life can be much worse than what we have. But it
definitely can be much, much worse; see, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the
Human Realm“.
§ It is not possible to comprehend this fact without fully understanding the “world view” of
the Buddha by looking at the wider world of 31 realms and the process of rebirth.
§ However, anyone can start on the Path without getting into the question of where there is a
rebirth process or not; see, the section “Living Dhamma“.
8. It is also clear how accumulation of saṅkhāra via paṭicca samuppāda leads to such varied feelings:
If we attach to something with a “like” or a “dislike”, we generate a mindset accordingly. This is
paṭicca samuppāda (pati + ichcha leading to sama + uppada; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
Introduction“).
§ In the first case, we generate “positive” mindset towards the object that we liked; thus if
everything goes well with the object, we feel happy and if things do not go well, we feel sad. It
is the other way for the object that we had a bad impression in the first encounter; we made a
negative mindset about the object.
§ In either case, the strength of the feeling is also proportional to the strength of the “like” or
“dislike”: Sama uppada or samuppāda means both in quality and quantity; the higher the
strength of “pati + ichcha”, the higher the strength in “sama + uppada“.
§ This is how we form habits (“gati“) too. A teenager tasting alcohol with a bunch of friends gets
attached to that setting and looks forward to have the same experience again; the more he
repeats, the more he gets “bonded”, and thus forms a drinking habit. See, “Habits and Goals”
and “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas“.
9. Thus all what we experience arise in a complex web of inter-related multiple factors. Only a
Buddha can “see this whole picture” and condense it down to a form that can be comprehended by
only a motivated human being.
§ If one really wants to understand Buddha Dhamma, one needs to spend time contemplating on
these multiple but impressively self-consistent key ideas of anicca, dukkha, anatta, and paṭicca
samuppāda.
The vipāka cycles of PS are described in, “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
Also see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“, ………..
The sequel to this post is at, “Feelings: Sukha, Dukha, Somanassa, and Domanassa“.
A deeper discussion on vedanā at: “Does Bodily Pain Arise Only Due to Kamma Vipāka?“.
6.4.11. Feelings: Sukha, Dukha, Somanassa, and Domanassa
5
In this post, we will discuss an important classification of vedanā based on whether they arise due to
kamma vipāka or our defiled thoughts (saṅkhāra).
1. This is a sequel to the previous post, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“, where we discussed
how feelings arise due to kamma vipāka and also due to mano saṅkhāra.
§ As discussed in several posts, we can avoid certain kamma vipāka from actually taking place by
not making suitable conditions for them to appear, but some strong ones are hard to avoid; see,
“What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“.
§ However, feelings (both good and bad) that arise due to saṅkhāra are totally avoidable, and
Arahants are completely free of them. We discussed this in the previous post.
§ Now let us discuss in detail what types of feelings arise due to those two causes.
2. First, let us discuss the feelings that we feel in our physical bodies.
§ They include sukha vedanā such as bodily comforts one feels sleeping in a luxurious bed,
eating tasty food, smelling nice odors, seeing something attractive, etc. They arise via the five
physical senses.
§ Then there are dukha vedanā that are again brought in via the five physical senses: injuries to
the body, headaches, eating something untasteful, smelling a bad odor, hearing to an ear-
piercing sound, etc.
§ Both those types of vedanā are due to kamma vipāka, and Arahants feel them too. Sukha
vedanā arise due to kusala kamma vipāka (past good deeds) and dukha vedanā arise due to
akusala kamma vipāka (past bad deeds).
§ These sukha and dukha vedanā mainly exist in the kāma loka, where the dense bodies of
the beings are sufficiently dense to impart them. In fact, it is mainly in the lower five realms
(including the human realm, that dukha vedanā exists as kamma vipāka. However, the worst
types of dukha vedanā are in the lowest four realms (apāyas), and that is why a Sotāpanna is
said to have overcome the worst of the suffering forever.
§ In the deva lokas, it is mainly the sukha vedanā that results due to good kamma vipāka. That is
why a Sakadāgāmī is never born at or below the human realm, and is said to become “healthy
forever”.
§ In the rūpa loka and arūpa loka, beings mainly have jhānic pleasures. Thus an Anāgāmī, who
will never be reborn in the kāma loka, is said to become “peaceful forever”.
3. Some vipāka vedanā felt by the body are neutral. Furthermore, all vipāka vedanā coming through
the other four physical senses are also neutral: adhukkhama asukha (without being painful or joyful,
just neutral) vedanā, which are commonly called upekkha vedanā.
§ It is important to note that these adhukkhama asukha or upekkha vedanā are the true reality of
experience. Vedanā comes from (“ve” + “danā”) which means “veema danaveema” (වීම
දැනවීම) in Sinhala. Basically, when we sense something via our six senses, we become aware
that something happened, i.e., seeing a picture, hearing a sound, etc.; that is vedanā.
§ For example, seeing a person X only leads to an upekkha vedanā for ANYONE initially.
4. However, within a fraction of a second of that seeing event, it COULD LEAD TO pleasant
(somanassa) or unpleasant (domanassa) feelings DEPENDING ON WHO IS SEEING X. Person X’s
wife or child will generate somanassa vedanā upon seeing X. However, an enemy of X will generate
domanassa vedanā upon seeing X.
§ On the other hand, a total stranger (or an Arahant) will not generate either somanassa or
domanassa vedanā upon seeing X, and that is the true reality, as mentioned in #3 above.
§ Thus both somanassa and domanassa vedanā are MIND MADE, and arise due to mano
saṅkhāra. And those saṅkhāra are generated based on one’s own gathi and āsavas.
§ In another example, if two people who are strong supporters of two opposing political parties
see the leader of one political party, one will generate somanassa vedanā and the other will
generate domanassa vedanā upon seeing that politician. Thus, those feelings could not have
resided with the politician, but arose entirely due to the gathi of those two people.
§ An Arahant will not generate either kind, because there is no attachment (or repulsion) to
anything or anyone for an Arahant.
§ This is a very important point that one could do insight meditation on.
5. We also know that both sukha and dukha vedanā can LEAD TO somanassa and domanassa
vedanā too. For example, When one gets a headache due to a kamma vipāka, one could be agonizing
over how long that will last, whether that will prevent one from going to a party next day, etc. Those
are domanassa vedanā due to that initial dukha vedanā from the headache.
§ On the other side, when one eats a tasty piece of cake (good vipāka vedanā), one could be start
thinking about buying more of that cake and enjoying it later; that gives rise to somanassa
vedanā.
§ Both the domanassa vedanā and the somanassa vedanā in the above two examples are totally
mind-made, i.e., due to saṅkhāra.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 789
6. Therefore, based on the three types of vedanā (sukha vedanā, dukha vedanā, and upekkha vedanā)
that arise due to kamma vipāka, ADDITIONAL two types of vedanā (somanassa and domanassa
vedanā) COULD arise depending on the āsava and gathi of the person experiencing them.
§ Those feelings that we feel IN THIS LIFE due to saṅkhāra are MOSTLY two kinds:
somanassa vedanā and domanassa vedanā. Those saṅkhāra also make bhava (via thoughts,
speech and actions) and those give rise to kamma vipāka mostly in future lives but also in this
life itself as we discuss below in #11.
§ Thus rebirths are also generated via (abhi)saṅkhāra and that is how the cycle of rebirths is
maintained. That is why it is called saṃsāra (“san” + “sāra“, where “sāra” means “good”), i.e.,
one perceives that it is good to keep doing saṅkhāra (“san” + “kāra”, where “kāra” or
“kriya” is action).
7. This is why Dukkha Sacca (First Noble Truth) does not mean that we can ELIMINATE the dukha
vedanā arising in our present physical body; those are due to kamma vipāka (the causes were already
done).
§ However, by gradually reducing saṅkhāra (with increased understanding of Buddha Dhamma),
we can stop making new saṅkhāra and thus eliminate FUTURE suffering. This is the key to
dukkha sacca. These saṅkhāra are also called assāda (āsvāda in Sinhala); see, “Assāda,
Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
8. Still, we can reduce bad consequences from past kamma vipāka using what are called
“strategies” (“upakrama“) in Buddha Dhamma.
§ One is to be mindful and not to let conditions for past kamma vipāka to take place. This is
discussed in, “What Is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?” and “Anantara and
Samanantara Paccaya“.
§ If the kamma vipāka has already started imparting its effects (say, someone finds out that one
has cancer), then one can work to alleviate that condition by using another related “strategy”:
One can get medical help and adopt a lifestyle that is opposes the spreading of the cancer. Even
here what we are doing is to overcome this bad condition by making suitable environment for
“opposing good kamma vipāka” to bear fruit. Thus, if one does not make an effort, the bad
kamma vipāka will run its course and one may die in short time.
9. Each living being’s body is designed to impart appropriate good and bad kamma vipāka suitable
for the kamma seed that gave rise to that particular life.
§ For example, an animal cannot implement “strategies” (“upakrama“) to overcome most of its
kamma vipāka. For example, it is unable to do anything about a wound (other than licking it) or
to think about dragging its cot to a sunny spot (our dog likes to be in the sun but we have to
move her cot!).
§ Some animals have built-in defenses for their survival, but they cannot make them any better.
For example, some birds instinctively know how to build a nest, but that “nest design” has not
been improved by them over millions of years. And baby turtles “know” the way to the ocean
and start trotting in the right direction minutes after their hatching; see, “How Character (Gathi)
Leads to Bhava and Jathi“.
§ Animals also are unable to do strong good or bad kamma. Even though most animals kill other
animals, that is not done with greed or hate, but just for survival. It is just like the instinct for
the birds to build nests or the baby turtles to head in the right direction to the sea. In
Abhidhamma language, they generate mostly, “upekkha sahagata citta” and those have much
less javana power.
§ Thus, animals cannot accumulate much good or bad kamma. Otherwise, they will never be able
to escape that “bhava“, since most survive by killing other animals. In the same way, whenever
they get a “good life” (say as a human)– which is very rare — that is due to a good kamma
vipāka done in a previous “good life”.
§ But not all animals are the same. Those “higher up” animals like monkeys can accumulate
kamma than “lower ones” such as worms, and cats and dogs are somewhere in between.
10. The potency of human saṅkhāra comes from the ability of humans to generate both “somanassa
sahagata citta” (thoughts with joy) for kusala kamma and akusala kamma. The javana power of
those citta are very high.
§ Thus when one is doing a good deed with joy, that brings much more merits compared to
someone who is doing it just because others are doing it, i.e., with an “upekkha sahagata citta“;
see, “‘A Simple Way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and Decrease Demerits (Akusala)“.
§ Even more strong javana arise when a good deed is done with knowledge that it will lead to
good results and why, i.e., one knows right from wrong.
§ But the most potent javana arise when a good deed is done with understanding of the anicca
nature, i.e., when one does it with “somanassa sahagata ñāṇa sampayutta citta“. Thus, paññā
(or ñāṇa) comes from an understanding that is deeper than just knowing right from wrong.
§ It works the other way around for bad deeds: the most potent javana (with high kammic power
that can lead to rebirth in the apāyas) are generated with “somanassa sahagata diṭṭhi
sampayutta citta“, i.e, thoughts with joy and wrong vision. A good example is someone who
commits murder and enjoys and it is done with the diṭṭhi that such an action cannot bring bad
consequences.
§ But when one commits murder due to anger that is done with aversion and displeasure:
“domanassa sahagata paṭigha sampyutta citta“; see, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka
Citta“.
11. Now let us consider the consequences of saṅkhāra in this life, that we mentioned in #6 above.
Suppose a teenager starts associating with bad friends and start drinking alcohol. Initially, he does not
even like the taste of it, i.e., he may be generating a domanassa vedanā due to the taste of alcohol.
But with the insistence of those friends he continues drinking.
§ Then he makes a habit (gathi) of it, begins to perceive the taste as a somanassa vedanā, and
starts making saṅkhāra about drinking. Even while in the middle of some other task, he starts
thinking about the next party where he can drink, and what types of drinks there will be and so
on.
§ Now “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” step in the paṭicca samuppāda leads to making a “new
viññāṇa for drinking”. The more he thinks about such parties and generate those somanassa
vedanā, the more viññāṇa, nama rūpa, etc that he makes for such “drinking events”.
§ And the stronger that “viññāṇa for drinking” gets, the more he will be thinking about it (making
more saṅkhāra). Then the habit is strengthened; see, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A
Scientific View“.
12. Mind phenomena are complex. But with the background that we have accumulated, we can figure
out some of the causes and possible effects. There is no need to memorize all these different terms;
they will be carved into the memory as one contemplates and sorts out one’s own experiences.
To summarize: Sukha and dukha vedanā arise due to kamma vipāka. Somanassa and domanassa
vedanā arise due to saṅkhāra, which in turn arise due to our gathi and āsavas. The more saṅkhāra we
do, the stronger a given gathi (habit) becomes, which in turn become āsavas (cravings) and fuel the
sansāric journey (rebirth process). This vicious cycle can be broken only through comprehending the
anicca nature of this world.
6.4.11. What is “Kāma”? It is not Just Sex
6
Revised October 31, 2017; revised December 18, 2018 (#13, #14)
1. “Kāma” comes from “kā” meaning “eat or destroy” and “ama” means Nibbāna. In our human
world, which is a part of “kāmaloka“, temptations for staying away from Nibbāna come from five
physical senses.
§ Some people believe “kāma” is just about engaging in sex. Some others believe attractive sense
objects are “kāma” objects, and those lead to defilements. Both are not quite correct.
§ While “attractive sense objects” can lead to “kāma assāda“, the objects themselves don’t have
kāma. An Arahant is not tempted by any such object. [assāda : [m.] mind-made pleasures
{taste; enjoyment; satisfaction.}]
§ While “attractive sense objects” can lead to “kāma assāda” or “mind-made pleasures”, the
objects themselves don’t have kāma. An Arahant is not tempted by any such object.
§ “Kāma assāda” or “sensual pleasures” are ASSOCIATED WITH our experiences through any
of the five physical senses. But as we will see below, the Buddha specifically taught that
“kāma” is a “made up pleasure”.
§ The lowest 11 realms are collectively called “kāma loka” because all such made up pleasures
are available through all five physical senses in those realms.
2. We experience those external sense inputs in two ways:
§ We experience them directly: For example, we see a person; hear a song; taste a piece of
cake; smell a fragrance; someone we love gives a kiss. Those are actual sense contacts and are
due to kamma vipāka.
§ You may be surprised, but most of our “sense pleasures” or “kāma assāda” are created by our
minds. A sense contact comes and goes away relatively quickly; but we keep thinking about it,
sometimes for hours. This “kāma assāda” is the one that we CREATE IN OUR MINDS, via
saṅkhāra.
§ For example, we may just see an attractive item in a store display which provides a sense
pleasure while we are looking at it may be for a few seconds.
§ But then we start thinking about how nice it would be to be able to buy it, enjoy it, and analyze
how to go about paying for it, etc. We may be thinking about for several days. Please take time
and contemplate on this. The initial sense contact of several minutes led to hours of thinking
about it and making up “additional pleasure”. That is kāma assāda.
3. In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Na Santi Sutta (SN 1.34)“, the Buddha defined “kāma” as that
second kind mentioned above: “Na te kāmā yāni citrāni loke, Saṅkapparāgo purisassa kāmo..”.
Translated: “World’s pretty things are not kāma, a person creates his/her own kāma by generating
mind-made pleasures (rāga sankalpanā)..”.
§ Buddha said that this world has many attractive pictures, sounds, tastes, smells, and touches.
But those are not “kāma”. The initial sense experience could be pleasant, but it is a kamma
vipāka (no saṅkhāra generated in the initial sense input).
§ When one attaches to such a sense experience and keep thinking about them, one makes
“sankalpita rāga” about it (by generating vacī and kāya saṅkhāra), that is “kāma”. Each person
generates his/her own kāma based on his/her gathi or samsāric habits/cravings.
4. Let us discuss what is meant by “sankalpita rāga“: Sankalpa or sankappa means thoughts. Raga
means the craving for pleasures in saṃsāra; see, “Lobha, Raga and Kamacchanda, Kamaraga“.
§ Thus “sankalpita rāga” means thinking about such sense pleasures and giving priority to them.
We tend to think for hours about an actual sense experience that we enjoyed in the past or one
that we are about to experience in the future.
§ Sometimes we also think for hours about how to enjoy a certain sense experience that seems
out of reach for various reasons. In all these cases, we can spend hours and hours thinking
about them and getting kāma assāda (or “āsvāda” in Sinhala) from it.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
792 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ In fact, most times sexual enjoyment comes from just thinking about a past experience or an
anticipated one. The actual contact pleasure is relatively short-lived.
5. As we pointed out in #2 above, some actual sense contacts arise due to kamma vipāka (good
kamma vipāka lead to good sense experiences, and bad lead to bad). Actual sense contacts are
relatively short-lived. Even the tastiest food, we can eat so much. Even if it is the most luxurious
chair, you cannot sit there for too long. You can think about all types of sense experiences and they
are relatively short-lived.
§ Even an Arahant experiences such sense experiences due to kamma vipāka, both good and bad.
He/she may eat tasty food when offered, ride in a luxurious car, or see eye-catching pictures
while on the road.
§ But he/she will not spend anytime afterwards thinking about such sense experiences, i.e., there
is no “sankalpita rāga“.
6. It is relatively easy to distinguish between sense pleasures due to kamma vipāka and those due to
kāma assāda.
§ When one is offered a tasty meal, for example, that is due to a previous good kamma, i.e., it is a
kamma vipāka. But when one starts thinking how good that meal was and start thinking about
how to enjoy another such meal, that is kāma assāda.
§ In the same way, one may be born to a wealthy family and get all types of luxurious sense
contacts, those are kamma vipāka.
§ Whether rich or poor, when one is thinking about acquiring and enjoying new sense pleasures
or reminiscing on past sense pleasures, that is kāma assāda.
7. Now we have two questions.
A. Why is it OK to experience direct sense pleasures that naturally comes one’s way, but not good to
enjoy “made-up mental pleasures” by thinking about them? (It is important to realize that even those
direct sense pleasures INITIATED by oneself do not count as harmless; when we think about it a bit,
we realize that such instances have their beginnings at “sankalpita rāga“, i.e., one must have thought
about to initiate it).
B. How can one experience an enjoyable sense pleasure and not be “tempted by it”, i.e., not make
“sankalpita rāga“?
8. The answers to those two questions can be found in one explanation. But that requires analyzing
the situation from a different vantage point than we are used to. This is the “Dhamma that has never
been known to the world..” or “pubbe ananussutesu Dhammesu..”.
§ The akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“. Those
“made-up mental pleasures” or “kāma assāda” are precisely what saṅkhāra are. These
have bad consequences, or adeenava, through the rest of the paṭicca samuppāda (PS) cycle:
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“, “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa,…..up to “jāti paccayā jara,
marana, soka, parideva,…”. Thus the end point is suffering.
§ When we experience a “direct sense contact” that naturally comes our way, that is not
saṅkhāra or kāma assāda. That is a kamma vipāka. They do not lead to future suffering.
§ This is a critical point to understand and is explained in detail in “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda
for Vipāka Viññāṇa“. Please read those again and make sure you understand the difference. If it
is not clear, please let me know.
9. Now let us consider some examples to understand how even a sense contact due to kamma vipāka
can lead to “kāma assāda“. In a given day, we are bombarded with millions of sense inputs. But not
all of them “grab our attention”, and make us start thinking about them; more specifically, to start
thinking about “getting more of it” of “how to acquire it so that it can be enjoyed at will”.
§ Why do certain sense inputs attract our attention more than others? A given sense input may
tempt one person, but may not affect another at all. For example, one person may like heavy
metal music, but another may be annoyed by it. We can think about many cases like that.
§ But each person can be tempted by a set of sense inputs that he/she has a liking for. For two
people, these sets may overlap to some extent but there will be differences. That is because the
āsavas/anusaya (or cravings) for each person is unique. They can change for a given person,
but they define one’s character at any given time. One can change one’s āsava/anusaya by
changing one’s habits or “gathi“. You can do a search on “āsava, anusaya, gathi, habits” and
read the relevant posts.
10. The more āsava/anusaya one has, it is more likely that one’s mind will be pulled in many
different ways. This is the key reason for the scatteredness of our minds. Such a mind can be
burdensome. This is called tāpa or “heat in the mind”; see, “Satipattana Sutta – Relevance to
Suffering in This Life“.
§ The āsava/anusaya can be compared to dirt at the bottom of a glass of water. If there is a lot of
dirt, only a slight disturbance can make the dirt come up and make the water dirty. But if it is
only a little bit, most minor disturbances may not make the water dirty.
§ Just like that, the more āsava/anusaya one has, it will be easier to make the mind restless.
§ On the other hand, if there is no dirt at the bottom of the glass, no matter what kind of
disturbance it is, the water will remain pure. The mind of an Arahant is like that. He/she can
live totally unaffected surrounded by the world’s most tempting sense objects. There will be no
“sankalpita rāga” or kāma assāda. Of course he/she will experience the good/bad kamma
vipāka same as others.
11. Now, one could say, “well, the more such sankalpita rāga that I make, it is better. I don’t mind if
mind gets many such assāda in a given time”.
§ In order to analyze that, we need to look at the ādīnava (bad consequences) of such asvāda,
other than mind being pushed and pulled in many directions as we discussed in the previous
bullet.
§ The problem is that each time we enjoy kāma assāda, we do (abhi)saṅkhāra, as we saw in #8
above. They lead to future suffering via the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle. This is
what we have been doing in countless number of births up to now.
12. That future suffering can arise both in this life as well as in future lives. It can materialize at
different levels depending on the “strength of the kāma assāda“.
§ Let us start at the most extreme level. One decides that “I have to have this. I am going to do
whatever it takes to get it”. With such a mindset one can kill, steal, engage in sexual
misconduct, lie, or make any number of other immoral acts with a “drunken mind”.
§ Of course the bad consequences are many, even during this life. One could get caught and go to
jail. Even otherwise, one will be under constant stress of worrying about being caught.
§ But stronger consequences will follow in future lives as well, with interest. Thus a normal
moral person can see the “ādīnava” in such strong kāma assāda.
§ By contemplating on such “ādīnava“, it becomes easier for one’s mind to automatically reject
doing such acts; this is “nissarana“. Through understanding of the consequences, one avoids
such acts.
13. At the next level, we may not do any of the immoral acts by body or speech speech, but may still
accumulate vacī saṅkhāra via constantly thinking about them. It is important to realize that such
conscious thoughts (vitakka/vicāra) are included in vacī saṅkhāra; see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī
Saṅkhāra“.
§ The problem with vacī saṅkhāra or kāma assāda is that they are addictive. One can spend
hours and hours enjoying past sense events of perceived future events (especially involving sex,
food, and also about one’s enemies).
§ And vacī saṅkhāra or kāma assāda appear to be harmless. No one else can know about them.
One could spend hours on end generating kāma assāda about an object of interest and derive an
enjoyment. But they have consequences.
§ It must also be remembered that all those kaya saṅkhāra and vacī saṅkhāra that one suppressed
by one’s will power started off as mano saṅkhāra. Thus even though dasa akusala
corresponding to speech and bodily actions were avoided, those due to mano saṅkhāra
(thoughts that just come to one’s mind) and then one normally “keeps going” by generating
CONSCIOUS deliberate thoughts or vacī saṅkhāra, which can lead to actual speech and even
bodily actions.
§ Thus even though dasa akusala corresponding to speech and bodily actions were avoided, those
due to vacī saṅkhāra (kāma assāda) would still count as bad kamma.
§ This is why keeping the conventional five precepts is not sufficient; the hard part is to purify
one’s thoughts or the mind; see, “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them“.
14. A key problem with vacī saṅkhāra or the kāma assāda is that they lead to the formation of bad
habits (gathi), which in turn lead to the formation of new āsava/anusaya or in strengthening old
āsava/anusaya; see, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“, and
other related posts.
§ It can become a vicious circle. In a way, this is the “wheeling process” of “riya” that sustains
the cycle of rebirths; see, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?“.
§ Even though those vacī saṅkhāra (abhijjā [abhijjhā], vyāpāda, micchā diṭṭhi) seem to be
harmless, those can lead to birth in the apāyas.
§ When one starts controlling such conscious thoughts (vacī saṅkhāra), one gati will gradually
change, and then those “automatic bad thoughts” or mano saṅkhāra will become less and less
frequent, because one’s āsava/anusaya will gradually reduce.
§ The best and permanent way to change āsava/anusaya is to comprehend anicca, dukkha,
anatta. When one realizes that “nothing in this world can be maintained to one’s satisfaction in
the long run” (anicca), one’s mind automatically stops thinking about such “made up
pleasures”. We will discuss this more in upcoming posts.
6.4.11. Kāma Assāda Start with Phassa Paccaya Vedana or Samphassa Ja
7
Vedana
In posts with advanced concepts I have to use to many Pāli words. There are no short phrases in
English to give the same meanings for phrases like “samphassa ja vedanā“. Thus it will be beneficial
to learn the meanings of these Pāli words and phrases, and also to be able to pronounce them if that
seems to be helpful. I have included some audio files in the post, “Pāli Glossary (A-K) and Pāli
Glossary (L-Z)“. Here is how to pronounce the Pāli words in the title of this post:
WebLink: Listen to pronounciation of : kāma-āsvāda-phassa-paccaya-vedanā-samphassa-ja-vedanā
1. In the previous post, “What is Kāma? It is not Sex“, we saw that kāma is not sex or even attractive
sense objects, ear-pleasing sound, tasty food, nice smell, or a sensual body touch as many believe.
Kāma is basically vacī saṅkhāra about sense-pleasing objects (constantly thinking about those
pleasures) , whether it is an eye-catching object, ear-pleasing sound, tasty food, nice smell, or a body
touch.
§ We saw that kāma (or kāma assāda) is sankalpitha rāga which means thinking about such
sense objects and giving priority to them. We also saw that such kāma assāda (or assāda in
Sinhala) are vacī saṅkhāra that arise when our deep-seated āsava/anusaya (which are related to
our habits or “gati“) are triggered by certain sense inputs.
§ Thus we can see that kāma assāda, sankalpitha rāga, vacī saṅkhāra mean basically the same
thing.
§ To re-emphasize: kāma assāda are beyond actually experiencing those sense inputs that come
our way due to good kamma vipāka (even though one would need to stay away from high-
pleasure activities, because one could get used to them and make corresponding habits). Kāma
assāda are craving and thinking and planning about such sense inputs.
§ Some extreme kāma assāda (or at least actions and speech initiated by them) can be
suppressed by understanding the bad consequences (ādeenava) of them.
§ Without a Buddha appearing in the world, we would not even realize that even milder kāma
assāda have bad consequences (ādeenava) too. Yet, they do have bad consequences as we saw
in the previous post.
2. The critical point that we need to discuss now is how to prevent milder, but still harmful, kāma
āsvada from arising in our minds. We basically have to use the same tactic that was discussed both in
the previous post and also in the introduction to this series, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana –
Introduction“.
§ When a mind comprehends that certain actions are harmful, it avoids such actions. As we
discussed in that introductory post, the best way to quit smoking is to fully understand the bad
consequences of that habit. Another is to cultivate a good habit (say, listening/reading
Dhamma) instead.
§ In the previous post we discussed how we avoid immoral actions via speech and bodily actions
by comprehending the bad consequences of such actions.
§ In other words, the primary way to effectively remove bad habits (nissarana) is to comprehend
the bad consequences (adeenava) of such kāma assāda from arising in our minds.
3. This is where another important aspect of Buddha “previously unheard Dhamma” comes into play.
This unique message is that in addition to being harmful, kāma assāda are unfruitful in the long run.
Even though we normally value them, when analyzed with the way the Buddha taught, we can see
that they are just mind-made due to our ignorance of the true nature of this world.
4. It is important to understand the big difference between vipāka vedanā and kāma assāda. We
cannot stop vipāka vedanā from arising; but we can stop kāma assāda by cleansing our minds.
Kāma assāda are normally triggered by a vipāka vedanā. Also, kāma assāda are totally made up in
our minds. Let us take a simple example to gain more insight.
§ Husband and wife are walking down the street and the wife stops and looks at a beautiful
painting on display in a store window. Husband looks at it, shrugs his shoulders and wants to
move on. It is somewhat expensive, so she is thinking about whether they can afford it right
now, but she would really like to buy it. Husband has no interest in it, and thinks that it is a
waste of money to buy it.
§ They both saw the same painting as a vipāka vedanā. That was just the “seeing event”, and as
we will discuss in Abhidhamma, most vipāka vedanā are neutral, like seeing or hearing. The
exceptions are bodily contacts, which can be either bodily dukha vedanā (like a cut or a
headache) or sukha vedanā (like getting a massage or being in an air-conditioned room on a hot
day) depending on whether it is bad or a good vipāka.
§ Now, any “happy feeling” that was generated in the mind of the wife would have been due to
kāma assāda. Such a “happy feeling” was not generated in the mind of the husband. This is an
important point. The “happy feeling” that was generated in the wife could not have been a
property of the painting; if so, it should have given the same “happy feeling” to the husband!
5. Thus in the above particular case, only the wife started enjoying kāma assāda due to seeing the
portrait. In other words, a pavutti kusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle operated only for the wife; it
was triggered by her deep-seated craving (assāda/anusaya) for such an object, which made her act
with avijjā.
§ We could also state the same process by saying that “cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ” was followed by “thinnan sangathi phasso” and “phassa paccayā vedanā“;
see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
§ Now she is attached and deliberately looks at the picture, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step
started and then went through the step, “(san)phassa paccayā vedanā” in a fraction of second;
see, “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ However, for the husband, who saw the same portrait, there was no assāda/anusaya for such an
object to “attach to it” and to act with avijjā and to initiate those processes; also see, ““Self”
and “no-self”: A Simple Analysis – Do We Always Act with Avijjā?“.
§ For some, this may be crystal clear but those who are not very familiar with the concepts may
want to review those relevant posts.
6. Now that she is “attached” to the portrait, the wife keep looking at it for a while, which will lead to
numerous such pavutti akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycles. Not only that, she will be enjoying
“kāma assāda” about that picture even after they left that place by thinking back about it. Now she
has made a “viññāṇa” and a “bhava” for it.
§ That “kāma assāda” can resurface with paṭicca samuppāda cycles that involve only the mind
when she is at home: It starts with “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“,
i.e., she just remembers the portrait while washing dishes. How does she start thinking about
the portrait when she was busy with some other task?
§ One way to explain that is to say that “she had ‘cultivated’ a viññāṇa” for that portrait and now
it can resurface sometimes even without a prompt. This is sometimes known as the
“subconscious”; see, “3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious“.
§ Another way to explain it by saying that she had made a “bhava” for liking that portrait and it is
a dhamma that can enter the mind when the conditions are right: “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca
uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“. However, that particular dhamma or concept or thought would
never make contact with the mind successfully if she was listening to a discourse or thinking
about a key concept like anicca. Since she was doing a task that did not motivate her much
(washing dishes) that is an opportunity for such “subconscious viññāṇa” to come to the surface.
7. Of course, now that “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ” step will be followed
by, “thinnan san gathi phasso” and “(san)phassa paccayā vedanā“; see, “Difference between Phassa
and Samphassa“. Her “gathi” for liking such pictures will make her mind “samphassa“, which in turn
will lead to “samphassa paccayā vedanā” or “samphassa ja vedanā“.
§ This is a vedanā that her husband will not get. He did not make a “viññāṇa” or a “bhava” for
that portrait and thus it will not come to his mind.
8. Now, suppose that a week later they are walking by the same store. The wife remembers the
portrait, but finds that it is no longer there; someone had bought it. Now, think about what happens to
the two of them.
§ The wife will be distraught: “I should have bought it; now I may not be able to find such a nice
portrait”. But the husband will not have any bad feelings, except may be some bad feelings
about his wife not been able to get what she wanted.
§ This is the suffering that we can stop from arising even in this life. It is not a vipāka vedanā, but
a “samphassa ja vedanā“. The wife got distraught only because she got attached to that portrait,
but the husband did not.
9. I just gave a very simple example from real life. Of course it is a relatively insignificant “taṇhā”
without drastic consequences. I just wanted to use it, because most people can understand it. Of
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 797
course the consequences can be much harsher if one gets attached to something of more significant,
keep thinking about it and make that “viññāṇa grow”, and eventually does something bad to acquire
it.
§ a) For example, X who “falls in love” with Y, may be thinking about it all day and make a
“very strong greedy viññāṇa” about X. So, X makes all kinds of plans in his/her mind about Y,
and the more he/she does it, the more strong that viññāṇa gets.
§ b) The more strong that viññāṇa is it is more likely to “come to his/her mind” because it is a
dhamma that is constantly hovering around his/her mind (or in the subconscious). It is easy to
start more PS process with “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“.
10. Note the difference between a) and b) above. In a), the process starts with “avijjā paccayā
saṅkhāra” when X first thinks about Y and starts thinking about Y with avijjā and gets “bonded to Y”
in his/her mind. At this point, a “baby viññāṇa” is formed about Y.
§ Now, since it is at an early stage, this “baby viññāṇa for Y” may not trigger “manañca paṭicca
dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ” (process b) often. And that viññāṇa may start dying out
if X does not get to think about Y for a while.
§ But if X sees Y again in a few days, then that “baby viññāṇa for Y” gets fed again. The sight of
Y makes X to go through many PS cycles and strengthen that “viññāṇa for Y”.
§ If X gets to see Y often and may be even to “hang out with Y”, that “viññāṇa for Y” will grow
because now X is giving it a lot of food (āhāra).
§ Now with a “strong viññāṇa for Y”, X’s mind will be constantly being with “dhamma about Y”
and it is more likely that “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ” will be
triggered even while X is doing something else.
11. Then one day, X hears that Y has got engaged to another person. What will happen to X? He/she
will be highly distraught, and depending on the level of attraction (and X’s gathi), X may do
something bad.
§ For example, if the attraction (level of taṇhā) was very strong, AND if X has “violent
character” (i.e., “violent gathi“), then X may hurt Y or the person that Y got engaged to. Then
not only will X be suffering due to “loss of Y”, but would also have made causes for FUTURE
SUFFERING by committing a bad kamma.
12. Now we can see how both taṇhā and gathi are two critical issues. Both those can be lessened by
contemplating on the bad consequences (adeenava) of acting foolishly.
§ And that can be done on a permanent basis by comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta. Then
one’s gathi will change permanently to the “moral gathi” of a Sotāpanna, and one will never do
anything that will lead to the birth in the apāyas. Even though a Sotāpanna may still generate
“samphassa ja vedanā“, due to some sense inputs, those will be milder and thus any suffering
incurred would be mild.
§ I hope that it is clear from this discussion that it is impossible to forcibly suppress kāma assāda
or thoughts about sense objects. The only way it can be done is via purifying the mind by
learning Dhamma (especially anicca nature of this world) and thinking about the bad
consequences of such thoughts (adeenava). This is what the Buddha realized as the
āsavakkhaya ñāṇa, the way to get rid of āsava (and anusaya) via getting rid of bad habits
(gathi) and cultivating good habits (gathi).
§ And this is discussed in the meditation (bhāvanā) section under, “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How
to Change Habits and Character (Gati)“.
6.4.12 Sakkāya Diṭṭhi is Personality (Me) View?
March 10, 2017; revised January 20, 2018; June 1, 2019; October 3, 2019
In this post, we will discuss why interpretations of two key concepts — sakkāya diṭṭhi and saṃyojana
— in many current English publications (including supposedly Theravāda texts) are incorrect.
Difference Between Wrong Views and Wrong Perceptions
1. Most texts describe sakkāya diṭṭhi as “self-illusion” or “personality belief”, i.e., “belief that a self
or I exists” (you can Google “sakkāya diṭṭhi” and see). Here it is essential to understand that there
is a difference between “wrong view” and “wrong perception.” A Sotāpanna would have removed
the wrong view (diṭṭhi), but not the false perception (saññā.)
§ But this perception (saññā) of a “self” (or a “soul” which is also called “ātma“) is NOT
sakkāya diṭṭhi per Tipiṭaka as we discuss below. That is really a saññā (perception) that we
have carried from life-to-life. For a discussion on saññā, see, “What is Saññā (Perception)?“.
§ The deeply-embedded idea of a “self” or an innate sense of “me” is rooted in the māna
cetasika.
§ If one gets offended if treated with disrespect, that means one still has māna left. Even an
Anāgāmī could be somewhat perturbed if he/she perceives to be treated badly. A component of
māna — called asmi māna — is still left at the Anāgāmī stage. Māna is removed not at the
Sotāpanna stage, but the Arahant stage.
A Sotāpanna Removes Only Wrong Views About an “Unchanging Self”
2. What is removed at the Sotāpanna stage is the wrong view (diṭṭhi) that there is something
unchanging and permanent like a “soul” is associated with oneself. That goes with the belief that
lasting happiness can be achieved by just living a moral life (even though that is essential.)
What is removed at the Sotāpanna stage is the tendency to value one’s physical body so highly, and
the view that a permanent happiness can be achieved by living in a certain way, or doing certain
(good) things.
§ When one can see that there is no “real essence” (like a “soul” or an “ātma”) associated with a
living being, this wrong view of sakkāya diṭṭhi foes away. A life-stream evolves according to
Paticca Samuppāda; see, “Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma.”
§ Therefore, it is incorrect to believe that the perception of a “self” will go away at the
Sotāpanna stage. It is also dangerous, because one is trying to do something that is not possible
to do at that stage. It is like a child in the primary school trying to get a Ph.D.
Sotāpanna Stage – Four Conditions
3. In the post, “Four Conditions for Attaining Sotāpanna Magga/Phala,” we discussed the four
conditions that need to satisfied to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
§ With fulfilling those conditions, one will break through three saṃyojana (mental bonds) and be
permanently released from rebirths in the apāyas (four lowest realms). The Pāli word
saṃyojana (or sanyojana or sanyoga) is usually translated as “fetters.” See, for example, the
Wikipedia article: “WebLink: WIKIPEDIA: Fetter (Buddhism).”
§ But as in many English publications (books, internet posts), the above Wikipedia article
misdescribes saṃyojana.
4. We are bound to the 31 realms in this world by ten “mental tethers” or saṃyojana. It can be
visualized as someone attached to a post by a rope, except that there is no one else that forcibly bind
us to the 31 realms.
§ Sanyojana or sanyoga (“san” + “yoga” where “yoga” means to bind) means bound via “san”;
see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ We voluntarily bind ourselves to this world with our minds, because we believe that somewhere
in these 31 realms we can find permanent happiness.
§ Most people think they can find happiness in this life itself! They don’t even pause to
contemplate what happens when one gets old and helpless. If one takes time to observe, there
are many examples around: famous, wealthy, and powerful, became helpless at old age and
died a miserable death.
Three Saṃyojana Removed
5. A Sotāpanna breaks through 3 of those ten sanyojana — or “bonds” or “tethers” — and gets
permanently released from the four lowest realms (apāyas). He/she does this by comprehending the
true nature of this world, i.e., attaining sammā diṭṭhi.
The keyword “sammā” comes from “san” + “mā,” which means “to become free of san.” For
example:
§ “Mā hoti jāti, jāti,” means “may I be free of repeated birth.”
§ “Mā me bāla samāgamo” means “may I be free of association with those who are ignorant of
Dhamma”.
§ Thus sammā diṭṭhi is to be free of wrong views. One gets some level of sammā diṭṭhi at the
Sotāpanna stage and completes it at the Arahant stage.
Importance of Comprehending the Unfruitful/Dangerous Nature of
This World (Tilakkhaṇa)
6. One has to break those bonds in one’s mind. One gains sammā diṭṭhi — right view to become free
of ‘san‘ — by comprehending the true nature of this world of 31 realms.
Anicca – that nothing in this world can bring a permanent happiness in the long run.
Dukkha – despite our struggles, we will be subjected to much more suffering than pleasures if we
remain in the rebirth process.
Anatta – therefore, one is truly helpless in this struggle to attain “something of the essence in this
world.” That is just an illusion.
§ See, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations.”
§ Those three saṃyojana are sakkāya diṭṭhi (also called sathkāya diṭṭhi), vicikicchā, and silabbata
paramasa.
Two Prevailing Major Wrong Views
9. The Buddha discussed 62 types of diṭṭhi that were present during that time in the Brahmajala
Sutta. We don’t need to address all of them today, because there are only two of those wrong views
that are prevalent today.
§ Religious people (Creator-based religions), believe that there is a “permanent soul,” and one
will be born in heaven or hell forever after this life. This idea of a “āthma” or a “self” was the
sassata diṭṭhi.
§ Science today believes that our thoughts arise in our brains, i.e., our mental body is the same as
the physical body (“I am my body”). So, when we die, that is the end of the story because the
physical body becomes dust; so they say, “enjoy life while it lasts.” That was the “uccheda
diṭṭhi” (pronounced “uchcheda”) that the Buddha also rejected: “Life terminating with the death
of the physical body.”
§ Thus the Buddha rejected both wrong views that “a self exists” and “a self does not exist.”
Things can exist due to causes, and if those causes do no exist, they cease to exist. That is the
principle of cause and effect explained in Paṭicca Samuppāda. Beings exist due to avijjā and
taṇhā, and they cease to exist when those cease to exist and reach permanent happiness (i.e.,
attain Nibbāna).
10. Even those religious people may subconsciously have that part of the uccheda diṭṭhi of “I am my
physical body.”
§ Our increasingly materialistic societies always feed this narrative — that it is so important to
look beautiful and robust because my body is what I am — via television and movies.
§ In other words, sakkāya diṭṭhi in the present day is rooted in the view of “I am my physical
body.” That leads to the perception, “I can achieve happiness by providing a lot of pleasurable
sense inputs to my body”.
Meaning of Sakkāya or Sathkāya
11. “Sath” or “sak” both mean “good” or “fruitful.”
§ And kaya can mean either one’s actions or one’s body, as we discussed in Kāyānupassanā; see,
“Kāyānupassanā – Section on Postures (Iriyapathapabba).”
§ Sakkāya diṭṭhi encompasses mainly two views: (i) “I am my body,” and I need to keep it
beautiful above all. (ii) I can achieve happiness by diligently pursuing (good) things in this
world.
Getting Rid of Sakkāya Diṭṭhi
12. Therefore, getting rid of sakkāya diṭṭhi in the present day requires one to realize that this physical
body is “just a shell” that we have possession of only for about 100 years.
§ That is why it is essential to realize the role played by our mental body, gandhabba, which
could live for thousands of years. But that also will cease to exist when we grasp a new
existence (bhava) at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment when the gandhabba itself dies.
§ Our next existence depends not on how well keep our physical bodies (they need to be healthy),
but how well we “improve” our mental body. Learning Dhamma and living according to that
Dhamma helps with the latter.
§ I have given a more strightforward explanation of gandhabba at the “Living Dhamma” section:
“Mental Body – Gandhabba“, and there is a separate section in the Abhidhamma section that
goes into more detail.
13. The second view associated with sakkāya diṭṭhi in #10 above. That one can achieve happiness by
diligently pursuing things in this world. Sakkāya diṭṭhi can only be removed by comprehending the
“anicca nature”.
§ See, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
§ When one comprehends anicca, one realizes that no matter what we do, staying in the rebirth
process leads to net suffering. Even though there are bouts of happiness to be had, those will be
insignificant to suffering in the long run, especially when one is (inevitably) born in the apāyas.
Cūḷavedalla Sutta (MN 44)
14. It should be noted that a full explanation of sakkāya diṭṭhi is given in the Cūḷavedalla Sutta
(Majjhima Nikāya 44) where Ven. Dhammadinna Thero explains it to her former husband Visakha:
“..Kathaṃ panāyye, sakkāyadiṭṭhi hotī”ti? “Idhāvuso visākha, assutavā puthujjano, ariyānaṃ
adassāvī ariyadhammassa akovido ariyadhamme avinīto, sappurisānaṃ adassāvī sappurisa-
dhammassa akovido sappurisadhamme avinīto, rūpaṃ attato samanupassati, rūpavantaṃ vā
attānaṃ, attani vā rūpaṃ, rūpasmiṃ vā attānaṃ. Vedanaṃ … pe … saññaṃ … saṅkhāre …
viññāṇaṃ attato samanupassati, viññāṇavantaṃ vā attānaṃ, attani vā viññāṇaṃ, viññāṇasmiṃ vā
attānaṃ. Evaṃ kho, āvuso visākha, sakkāyadiṭṭhi hotī”ti.
§ First, it is essential to realize that “atta” in the above verse used in the conventional sense, to
denote “I.”
§ What we have discussed regarding “I am my body” is stated in the bold text above that can be
translated as: “I am my body, my body is me, my body is in me, I am in my body”; see,
“Anattā in Anattalakkahana Sutta – No Soul or an Ātma“. Thus one may see one’s
rūpakkhandha as one’s “attā” in four ways.
§ In the same way, some people could take one’s vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa to be
oneself in four ways as above. All these mental components give rise to the idea that “I
remember this and that happened to me a long time ago; so there must be a continuation of me
until the body dies.” Therefore, this wrong view encompasses 20 types of (“visativatthuka“)
sakkāya diṭṭhi.”
§ The French Philosopher Rene Descartes famously said, “I think; therefore I am”; he proposed
that those thoughts arise in the pineal gland in the brain. That is a part of uccheda diṭṭhi.
Two Meanings of Atta
15. When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one “sees with wisdom” (becomes “dassanena
sampanno”) that it does not make sense to take the stand “I am my body,” etc. as above.
§ However, “just seeing” that it makes sense, and actually verifying and experiencing that to be
accurate, are two different things. One finally confirms that to be accurate and thereby gets rid
of the perception of “me” (called “asmi māna“) only at the Arahant stage.
§ There was a lengthy discussion on this issue at the discussion forum. I recommend reading it
since it is not possible to put it in a short post like this; see, “WebLink: Wrong English
translations of Aniccha, Anatta, Sakkāya diṭṭhi.”
16. The confusion in conventional translations of sakkāya diṭṭhi seems to arise when they try to
connect “atta” in the above verse (“rūpaṃ attato“) as the opposite of “anatta” in Tilakkhaṇa. Atta
has two meanings: one meaning is “I” or “myself” as in “atta hi attano natho” (“only I can be of
salvation to myself”), and that is the meaning implied in the above verse.
§ The other meaning of “atta” is “in control” or “has an essence”, and the opposite of that is the
anatta in Tilakkhaṇa: “one is helpless in this rebirth process”.
§ Those two meanings are explained in “Attā Hi Attano Nātho” and in detail in, “Pāli
Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“.
§ That is why one needs to be cautious when using Pāli dictionaries. One cannot define and fix
the meaning of a Pāli word. One HAS TO KNOW the context; see, “Pāli Dictionaries – Are
They Reliable?“.
What is Vicikicchā?
17. The second saṃyojana removed at the Sotāpanna stage is vicikicchā. Does it means doubts about
the Buddha, Dhamma, and Saṅgha as explained in many translations? It is informative to see how
such doubts are related to the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Vicikicchā comes from vi+chi+ki+icchā. Our distorted views (diṭṭhi) that worldly things can
lead to happiness lead to our liking (“iccā”) for them. We then take actions (“ki” or “kriya“) are
based on our craving. And, “Cha” means citta or the way we think, here based on such diṭṭhi.
To dissociate (“vi“) from such thoughts is vicikicchā.
§ One dissociates from such wrong views by comprehending “anicca nature.” When one
becomes a Sotāpanna, one automatically sees the “fruitlessness” in many immoral or
inappropriate actions. One truly knows deep down that most of our efforts in pursuing sense
pleasures are in vain. However, until one becomes an Anāgāmī, one is still attached to sense
desires.
§ For example, a Sotāpanna may still engage in sex, but will not engage in immoral sexual
activities outside marriage. While the first can still lead to one’s rebirth in the human and deva
realms, the latter can lead to births in the apāyas. A Sotāpanna is released only from the
apāyas.
§ In other words, if one has vicikicchā, one MAY do immoral apāyagami actions under tempting
conditions. But a Sotāpanna is INCAPABLE of doing such actions under ANY circumstance.
A Sotāpanna will not have any doubts about which activities are really immoral.
What is Silabbata Parāmāsa?
18. The third saṃyojana, silabbata parāmāsa, is the wrong view that Nibbāna can be attained by
following specific precepts/rituals. They include five or eight precepts (or just by doing good things).
§ Attaining Nibbāna REQUIRES lokuttara sammā diṭṭhi. To achieve lokuttara sammā diṭṭhi, one
needs to grasp the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta). See, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
§ When one comprehends anicca, one stays away from immoral actions. That happens not
because one is firmly adhering to a set of precepts or rituals. Now one knows deep inside that
such actions are fruitless and dangerous in the long run.
§ However, following precepts (i.e., staying away from immoral deeds) is necessary to get to
mundane sammā diṭṭhi. That enables one’s mind cleansed enough to be able to comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa.
Kāma Rāga NOT Removed at Sotāpanna Stage
19. Finally, a Sotāpanna needs to break two more saṃyojana or bonds — kāma rāga and paṭigha —
to become free of the kāma loka. Only an Anāgāmī is free of rebirth anywhere in the kāma loka,
which includes human and six deva realms.
§ The last five saṃyojana (including the perception of a “self” or māna) will be removed only at
the Arahant stage; see, “The Cooling Down Process (Nibbāna) – How Root Causes are
Removed.”
1. First I need to clarify the title. Of course citta (pronounced “chittha”) are thoughts. All kamma start
as mano saṅkhāra, i.e., one starts thinking about something and it escalates into speech and bodily
action by the “wheeling” or “riya” process; see, “Nibbāna – Stopping of the Sansāric Vehicle“.
§ The complete cessation of doing saṅkhāra happens only when one becomes an Arahant. But
after attaining the Sotāpanna stage, this “wheeling process” stops for certain types of initial
thoughts or citta.
2. We have seen that apāya is a common word for the lowest four realms of existence, see, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“. Apāyagāmi (“apāya” + “gāmi” means directed towards) citta are
those that lead to potent kamma responsible for rebirth in the lowest four realms.
3. So, what cittas or thoughts gets one started on the “wheeling process” or a “thought process” that
leads to speech or bodily action of very bad consequences, i.e., birth in the apāyas? These are
thoughts that arise because one does not have a full understanding of the “nature of this world”, i.e.,
the Tilakkhaṇa, or anicca, dukkha, anatta.
Out of the 89 possible citta (see, “The 89 Types of Citta“) 12 are immoral citta:
§ 8 with the lobha (greed) root; moha root is there too.
§ 2 with the dosa (hate, ill will) root; moha root is there too.
§ 2 with just the moha (ignorance) root.
ALL TEN immoral acts (dasa akusala; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“) are done with
these 12 types of citta.
4. We generate greedy thoughts because we “want to get possession of things that seem to provide
happiness”. When we do not get what we want, we generate hate or ill will towards whoever Is in the
way.
§ And we do both types of actions because we do not realize that it is not possible to achieve
lasting happiness with anything in “this world”. Not only that, we do not realize that by doing
those bad actions we accumulate bad kamma (i.e., accumulate kammic energy) that are going to
have bad consequences in the future, either in this very life or in future lives.
§ Thus ignorance of the true nature of ‘this world” is the cause of all bad actions done with greed
and hate; this is why the moha root is in all of them. We also do certain bad actions just based
on ignorance too, like comparing how one is “better” than another, etc.
A. The two ignorance-rooted citta are:
§ One associated with vicikicchā (vichi+ki+ichcha = liking based on distorted view, i.e, diṭṭhi).
Commonly vicikicchā is described as “doubt”, which could be taken as “doubt about the true
world view”. Just like a fish biting on a bait due to not “seeing” the hook, we just grab things
without “seeing” the consequences, i.e., possible harm to others and the consequences of such
harmful actions for ourselves.
§ One associated with uddhacca (restlessness or agitation of the mind). This is opposite of
samādhi or ability to concentrate and being able to think through consequences of actions. One
could have uddhacca even if one knows the “true nature” of this world; it is sort of a
cumulative result of all defilements accumulated through beginning-less saṃsāra. This is
completely removed only at the Arahant stage.
All 12 types of citta have ignorance as a root (primary as in the above two types) or as secondary in
the other ten citta. These ten citta can be divided into two categories in another way, i.e., based on
whether such cittas arise mainly due to vicikicchā (i.e., due to not knowing the true nature of this
world) or uddhacca (i.e., the agitation of the mind due to all accumulated defilements).
B. Out of the eight greed-rooted citta, four arise with wrong view (diṭṭhi), i.e., due to lack of
understanding of the “true nature of this world”, and that “this world” is much more complex than we
perceive with our senses, and that our life does not end here, but what we do will have consequences
for very long times into the future. The other four are done anyway, even with right view, because of
the agitation of the mind due to all “gunk” accumulated over the long sansāric journey. Thus the
eight greed-based citta can be divided into two broad categories:
§ Four done with wrong views (diṭṭhi) are removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Four dissociated from wrong view (i.e., it does not matter whether one has right view if
defilements still cloud the mind; for example even one who has attained the Sotāpanna stage
may do these four)
C. The two hate-rooted citta are also done regardless of whether one has right view (at the Sotāpanna
stage) or not:
§ These two hate-rooted citta are dissociated with wrong views, but are due to the agitated mind
(uddhacca). Thus they persist after the Sotāpanna stage, up to th Anāgāmī stage.
Now we can see the broad view:
5. Five cittas (vicikicchā and the four greed-rooted citta associated with wrong view) arise because
one does not know the true nature of the world, Tilakkhaṇa, i.e, anicca, dukkha, anatta. They
contribute to one of the four types of āsava called the diṭṭhi āsava or ditthasava.
These are the same citta that could lead to apayagami kamma. Thus when one attains the Sotāpanna
stage, these five citta cease to arise forever, and one WILL NOT BE ABLE to do any such grave
kamma. Thus, the Sotāpanna stage is a very important stage of Nibbāna where āsavakkhaya happens
to a significant level due to the removal of ditthasava:
§ A Sotāpanna attains that stage just by getting rid of diṭṭhi or wrong views: sathkaya (or
sakkaya) diṭṭhi is the view that lasting happiness can be attained via pursuing things in this
world. Vicikicchā is leads to tendencies and actions associated with wrong worldviews, and
silabbata paramasa is the view that Nibbāna can be attained by following specific
precepts/rituals without cleansing the mind.
§ The other seven citta are the ones that are harder to remove. They arise due to an agitated mind
which is a result of other defilements (āsavas) that we have accumulated over the long
saṃsāra; see. “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of āsavas“.
§ Out of these, the two hate-rooted citta are lessened in strength at the Sakadāgāmī stage and are
removed at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ The remaining four greed-rooted citta (those dissociated from wrong views) contribute to
kamaraga (greed for things in the kamaloka). Kamaraga is lessened at the Sakadāgāmī stage
and completely removed at the Anāgāmī stage. Thus an Anāgāmī is unable to generate hateful
thoughts or lustful thoughts, and is free from rebirth anywhere in the kamaloka. An Anāgāmī
has removed kamasava, another part of the āsava.
§ Finally, it is only at the Arahant stage that those remaining four greed-rooted citta (which still
contribute to bhavasava) and the uddhacca citta (which still contribute to avijjasava) are
completely removed. This is when all the defilements or āsavas are completely removed from
one’s mind.
6. It is clear that all five akusala citta that are removed at the Sotāpanna stage arise due to micchā
diṭṭhi, i.e., not comprehending the Three Characteristics of existence: anicca, dukkha, anatta. Also
see, “Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct Views)”.
7. This realization of correct views CANNOT be attained by following rituals, such as just obeying
precepts. It comes naturally when one COMPREHENDS the true nature of this world of 31 realms:
anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“. That it is unfruitful to involve in any kind of
activities to gain mundane pleasures by hurting other beings. Such an understanding makes
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 805
irrevocable changes in one’s manomaya kāya, and thus prevents one from doing such activities even
in the future lives.
8. Now it is important to realize that a Sotāpanna can be a parent taking care of a family. He/she will
be doing a job, driving kids to school, and doing all other daily tasks. But one does all this with the
clear understanding that one should NOT do certain things. One could live a moral life suitable for a
Sotāpanna without giving up ANY responsibilities as a regular “householder”. Actually one could
even attain the Anāgāmī stage without becoming a bhikkhu. And there were many “householders”
that had attained Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī stages at the Buddha’s time; there are some even
today.
6.4.14 What is the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?
Revised May 10, 2017;December 1, 2017; July 7, 2018; August 16, 2019
1. Upon attaining the Sotāpanna stage, micchā diṭṭhi (the ten types of micchā diṭṭhi together with
wrong views of nicca, sukha, atta) is COMPLETELY removed. That is one akusala out of dasa
akusala. But that itself accounts for more than 99% of akusala (defilement) from one’s mind since
the “apāyagāmi strength” of other nine akusala kamma are also removed.
§ This illustrates the importance of removing micchā diṭṭhi, and why I have so many posts on
that. Also, see the first discourse in, “Three Marks of Existence – English Discourses.”
§ Some people think a Sotāpanna is incapable of breaking the five precepts based on an incorrect
translation of the WebLink: suttacentral: Gihi Sutta (AN 5.179). The relevant verse is:
“..ariyasāvako pāṇātipātā paṭivirato hoti, adinnādānā paṭivirato hoti, kāmesumicchācārā
paṭivirato hoti, musāvādā paṭivirato hoti, surāmerayamajjapamādaṭṭhānā paṭivirato hoti“.
§ However, “pativirato hoti” does not mean “abstains from” as translated at many online
; it means “does not do with liking.” Thus, a Sotāpanna may — under some conditions —
sites
break the five precepts. It is only an Arahant that will not break five precepts or engage in any
of dasa akusala.
§ The five precepts have deeper meanings too: “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by
Them.”
2. The six things that a Sotāpanna will not do per “WebLink: suttacentral: Bahudhātuka Sutta (MN
115)”:
§ Killing one’s mother.
§ Killing one’s father.
§ Killing an Arahant.
§ Injuring a Buddha.
§ Causing saṅgha bheda (spreading wrong Dhamma is included here).
§ Taking refuge in anyone other than a Buddha (i.e., believing in other ways of “salvation”).
3. Nakhasikha Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya), describes the vast amount of defilement removed by a
Sotāpanna.
§ One time the Buddha picked up a little bit of dust with the tip of his fingernail, and asked the
bhikkhus, “What do you think bhikkhus? Which is greater: the little bit of dust I have picked up
with the tip of my fingernail, or the soil in this great Earth?”.
§ Of course the bhikkhus answered that the amount of soil in this Earth is vastly more massive
than the bit of dust picked up on a fingernail.
§ Then the Buddha told the bhikkhus that the number of defilement that a Sotāpanna has removed
could be compared to the soil in the whole Earth. The amount that he/she has left to remove can
be compared to the bit of dust on his fingernail.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
806 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ Therefore, the amount of suffering a Sotāpanna has left in future rebirths is insignificantly
small.
§ There is a decent online explanation of the sutta that one can look up: WebLink:
ACCESSTOINSIGHT: Nakhasikha Sutta: The Tip of the Fingernail
4. Another simile is in the Sineru sutta of the Saṃyutta Nikāya. “The amount of suffering a
Sotāpanna has to endure can be compared to seven grains of sand on top of mount Sineru. In
comparison, the amount of suffering a normal human has left to endure is sand in the whole
mountain”.
§ That is logical, of course, since the suffering encountered in the niraya is never ceasing. One
birth in the niraya (hell) would lead to much more suffering than thousands, millions of births
in the human or higher realms.
§ A Sotāpanna will NEVER be reborn in the four lowest realms. Furthermore, he/she will have
only seven future bhava left, and those in the human realm or the realms above it.
5. That may be why most people tend to think that attaining the Sotāpanna stage requires attaining
jhānas, all sorts of abhiññā powers, etc. None of that is a requirement for achieving the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ But at least half of the ten evils (dasa akusala) must be removed to become a Sotāpanna? No. It
turns out that a Sotāpanna removes only one of the dasa akusala, that of niyata micchā diṭṭhi.
Of course, in achieving that, a Sotāpanna would have reduced the “apayagami strength” of
most of the other dasa akusala.That is the key to understand. In particular, abhijjā [abhijjhā] or
lobha is reduced to rāga level and vyāpāda or dosa is reduced to paṭigha level; see, “Lobha,
Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā.”
§ For a discussion on dasa akusala, see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala).” As discussed in
that post, Niyata Micchā Diṭṭhi (established wrong views) is an akusala done with the mind.
§ A Sotāpanna is said to have achieved “dassanena pahatabba” or removal of defilement via
correct vision. He/she has removed an unimaginably vast amount of evils (“keles” or “kilesa“
or “klesha“) with the removal of micchā diṭṭhi, or attaining the first stage of Sammā Diṭṭhi: the
true nature of this world of 31 realms.
§ How a Sotāpanna reduces dasa akusala via getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi “to overcome
apayagami citta” is discussed in “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta.”
Here is it described how five out of the 12 akusala citta do not arise after the Sotāpanna stage;
those are the five that lead to birth in the apāyas.
6. This is a critical point to understand. Removal of micchā diṭṭhi leads to the stopping of highly
immoral actions. Most people worry excessively on the defilement done with the body and speech.
They are afraid of even accidentally killing an insect, or telling even a “white lie.” Of course those
need to be avoided too, because moral behavior (speech and actions) are a prerequisite for cleansing
the mind.
§ But having niyata micchā diṭṭhi is million-fold more weighty. These and other types of Niyata
Micchā Diṭṭhi (established wrong views) are discussed in, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa
Akusala)” and “Mahā Chattarisaka Sutta (Discourse on the Great Forty).”
§ It would be beneficial to understand the weights of different types of kamma; see, “How to
Evaluate Weights of Different Kammas.”
§ If one has a vessel that is leaking water, there is no point in trying to plug the smaller holes
first. One should seal the largest hole first, which in this case is getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi or
false views (about this world).
§ That may still not convince some. If so, see whether this conclusion is contradictory to anything
in the Tipiṭaka. One should carefully examine all the “requirements” that need to be fulfilled to
attain the Sotāpanna stage. It should become clear that indeed, this is all one needs to do.
7. So, we have come to the “crux of the matter”: How can one remove niyata micchā diṭṭhi? That
is ALL one has to do to become a Sotāpanna.
§ However, complete removal of niyata micchā diṭṭhi requires an understanding of the
Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta) to some extent.
§ One cannot PRETEND to believe in things that one honestly does not believe in. Just by
saying, “I do believe in rebirth, or, I do believe that there are other realms in this world other
than the human and animals realms,” for example, WILL NOT WORK.
§ That is not like going to courts of law and trying to convince a jury of one’s innocence. One’s
mind need to “see the realities of this world.”
§ And that comes only via learning Dhamma, the correct version, the version that was
discovered by the Buddha and has been passed down through generations of Noble Persons or
Ariyas. That is what we discussed in detail in the post, “Four Conditions for Attaining
Sotāpanna Magga/Phala.”
§ That is also why we need to clearly comprehend the term, saññā, commonly translated to
English as “perception.”
8. Of course, Saññā is one of 52 cetasika and one component of pañcakkhandha. It is actually one of
the seven universal cetasika that arise with every citta.
§ Saññā works very closely with another universal cetasika called manasikara. Manasikara is the
cetasika that brings old memories and future hopes into a citta. When cetana “puts together the
citta,” the citta recognizes the subject (saññā) and automatically produces vedanā (feelings)
about it. Thus we can see the significant roles played by those four cetasika right away.
§ But saññā is not limited to “recognizing objects.” Saññā is the “inner understanding” of any
concept.
§ For example, when we hear the word, “fire,” we immediately recognize what that means. Even
a picture of a fire may flash in our minds. But a little baby (or a person who does not
understand English) does not have a “saññā” for that word; it means nothing to them. But the
baby (or that person) can understand what “fire” means if we teach it to them.
§ Growing up, we acquire innumerable “saññā” mostly by becoming familiar with them. We first
recognize who “mother” and “father” are, know different colors, different objects, etc.
9. Even though we acquire “saññā” for most objects and people, some strong saññā may be “passed
down” from previous lives. That can take many forms.
§ Some people, when visiting a place that one had never previously visited in this life, may
already “know” about that place in great detail. Children who remember past lives have been
reported to lead investigators to various locations in faraway cities where they had lived in
previous lives. Even many adults have said that they can walk a city with complete confidence
that they are visiting for the first time.
§ Then there is the “ability” to play the piano, recite suttas, or just being able to comprehend
complex mathematics as a child, etc. Some of these cases discussed in “Evidence for Rebirth.”
10. We “acquire” most saññā through our families first, then through friends, schools, workplaces,
etc.
§ Thus most of our “world views” or diṭṭhis are acquired through our families. Our first
impressions on moral issues, politics, and religions come from our families.
§ Those sannas are hard to change, depending on how forcefully and frequently they have been
used.
§ However, the human mind is unique. When given enough substantial evidence, one’s saññā
about something or some concept can PERMANENTLY change. For example, when one learns
how to do algebra (addition and subtraction, etc.) correctly, one will never forget that. And
even if an authority figure (a teacher) insists that one plus two is four, even a child will not
accept that. He/she can count with fingers and show the teacher that the correct answer IS three.
11. As we grow up, we acquire saññā for more specialized tasks. One could “learn” to become a
carpenter, a doctor, an engineer, etc.
§ This “learning” is acquiring “saññā” for a particular task. It is not just memorizing how
to do things. When a physician finishes his/her learning, he/she can “troubleshoot” a brand
new patient and figure out what is wrong. When an engineer builds a new structure, it could be
something that had not been made before. One acquires “skills.”
§ Once one learns a “skill,” one will never forget that; at least it is easy to “get back to it”. One
who had learned to ride a bicycle as a child may never touch a bicycle for 30-40 years. But
then, even at old age, he will be able to ride a bike though he may fall once or twice initially.
12. A Sotāpanna acquires a basic level of understanding about “this world” and that “knowledge” or
“comprehension” does not go away even in future lives. Thus, it is a strong version of “memories
from past lives” that some children report.
§ Once someone sees a “glimpse” of the Buddha’s core message that there is no permanent
happiness to be had by wishing for anything in this world in the long run. The term “in the long
run” implies that one believes that at the end of this life one WILL BE reborn. And that rebirth
WILL BE determined by not only how one lives this life, but also how one had lived previous
lives.
§ That kind of a “vision change” does not happen quickly, unless one has “saññā” about that
from previous lives; that is why it is easier for some people to grasp these concepts.
§ And this “saññā” cannot be acquired via memorizing suttas, how to recite paṭicca samuppāda
cycle, etc. Instead, one needs to COMPREHEND the concepts.
§ The KEY concept to grasp is the “anicca saññā.”
13. The only way to “build up” the correct saññā is to make an effort to understand the key message
of the Buddha. Humans usually have wrong perceptions or “vipareetha saññā” that one can find
happiness in this life by working hard. Most people do not even think beyond this life, even if they
believe in rebirth. That is also called the “nicca saññā” (pronounced “nichcha sannā”), i.e., by
working hard, or by sheer luck, one can achieve and maintain things in this world to one’s
satisfaction.
§ The fundamental teaching of the Buddha is about the “anicca saññā,” i.e., it is NOT
POSSIBLE to maintain ANYTHING to one’s satisfaction in the long run. The Sotāpanna stage
of Nibbāna is attained or when the anicca saññā is cultivated to some significant extent.
§ When one has developed the anicca saññā to this level, one’s mind automatically blocks
“apāyagāmi citta.”
§ As we discussed in the Abhidhamma section, citta flow very fast, and we do not have control
over those initial cittas. We are helpless to stop them in extreme cases like sudden rages or
sheer greed. The key is to getting rid of immoral gati (by getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi among
other things).
§ It is this anicca saññā that grows as one attains higher stages of Nibbāna (Sakadāgāmī and
Anāgāmī) and peaked at the Arahant stage. At the Arahant stage one can see the “anicca
nature” of ALL saṅkhāra, not only abhisaṅkhāra. That is what is expressed by, “Sabbe
saṅkhāra anicca,” and in the Girimananda sutta, the Buddha told Ven. Ananda, “Ayaṃ vuccati
Ānanda, sabba sankhāresu anicca sannā”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – According to Some
Key Suttas.”
14. When one develops the anicca saññā via learning Dhamma (listening and reading), the tendency
to act immorally, even under extreme pressure, will slowly diminish.
§ One would be able to see the corresponding “cooling down” (reduced stress level) when one
thinks back after several months (could be sooner for some people). One will gradually feel the
nirāmisa sukha, and will be drawn to Dhamma. One would automatically start spending more
time on learning Dhamma.
§ One does not need to force anything, except to make an initial determination to verify the truth
of what I have discussed above by reading (and listening) and developing the “Dhamma
vicaya” sabbojjanga. Make a habit to critically evaluate relevant posts at this site and from
other sources. That is the best and direct meditation technique for attaining the Sotāpanna
stage. Buddha Dhamma is all about learning the true nature of this world, which WILL
automatically lead to the purification of the mind; see, “The Importance of Purifying the Mind.”
§ The more one purifies one’s mind, the easier it will become to grasp the key Dhamma concepts
and cultivate the “anicca saññā.” And developing anicca saññā itself leads to the purification
of the mind. That is why learning becomes exponentially fast, once getting some traction.
15. It should be quite clear that the enormous amount of defilement or “kilesa” ( or “anusaya“) are
removed by just getting rid of niyata micchā diṭṭhi.
§ That is because cultivating anicca saññā purifies one’s mind, and one can start seeing the
critical message of the Buddha. Without the anicca saññā, one can struggle for years and years
without any benefit.
§ Ask anyone who has done “breath meditation” (and believes anicca means “impermanence”)
for even 20-30 years whether they have made any significant progress. I am not talking about
just calmness of the mind (or even mundane jhānās) that is only temporary (and can be broken).
One will know when one has reduced lobha, dosa, moha to the extent that one will never be
born in the apāyas.
Of course, one needs to have removed micchā diṭṭhi to even become a Sotāpanna Anugāmi: “Micchā
Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage.”
More on the anicca saññā at: How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā
6.4.15 Udayavaya Ñāṇa
o Udayavaya (Udayabbaya) Ñāṇa – Introduction
o Nibbatti Lakkhana in Udayavaya Ñāṇa
o Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa
o Udayavaya Ñāṇa – Importance of the Cittaja Kaya
These posts can be better understood if one has a good understanding of the gandhabba or manomaya
kāya: “Manomaya Kāya“.
6.4.15.
1
Udayavaya (Udayabbaya) Ñāṇa – Introduction
February 12, 2016; revised October 23, 2018
The udayavaya ñāṇa (ñāṇa pronounced “ngana”; see the pronunciation guide in “Pāli Glossary (A-
K) and Pāli Glossary (L-Z)”) is sometimes referred to as the udayabbaya ñāṇa.
§ In fact, the actual Pāli word is udayabbaya (I had inadvertently used the Sinhala word
udayavaya). A description of the udayabbaya ñāna is in the Paṭisambhidāmagga Pakarana:
“WebLink: suttacentral: 1.1.6. Udayabbayañāṇaniddesa“.
§ However, it is about the arising (udaya) and destruction (vaya) of a saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala). This is another example of two Pāli words combining to sound differently:
udayabbaya.
§ When one realizes this true nature, and then also realizes that there is a way out, that leads to a
higher level of nirāmisa sukha. That is when one “sees Nibbāna” and attains the Sotāpanna
stage.
§ When one gains the udayavaya ñāṇa, one can see the causes that need to be eliminated to
overcome otherwise inevitable future suffering.
5. In udayavaya ñāṇa, the term “vaya” has two meanings:
§ Whatever is arisen due to past causes will be subjected to unexpected change and eventually is
destroyed. This understanding about how anything that arises and causes a net suffering (even
though there are pleasures to be had, they are minor compared to the suffering) is a part of the
udayavaya ñāṇa.
§ More importantly, one can stop these things from arising and thus permanently remove
suffering. Thus understanding udayavaya leads to knowledge about the dukkha nirodha sacca,
i.e., that by eliminating the causes, one can stop future suffering from arising. This is the
second and more important meaning of “vaya” in udayavaya.
§ But let us first discuss the factors associated with “udaya” or “arising”.
6. The “udaya” part of the udayavaya ñāṇa describes five factors that lead to the arising of anything
in this world. Anything in this world belongs to one of the five aggregates (pancakkhanadha): rūpa
khandha, vedanā khandha, saññā khandha, saṅkhāra khandha, viññāṇa khandha.
§ Thus our world is not only the rūpa khandha. In fact, most people think about material things in
the world as THE WORLD. But Buddha Dhamma reveals a more “personal world” which
includes how one feels about things in the world (vedanā), how one perceives those things
(saññā), and how one thinks and makes plans (saṅkhāra) according to how one feels and
perceives. The end result of those three (vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra) are the viññāṇa that one
builds (future hopes and desires) according to one’s gathi (character).
§ In fact, pañcakkhandha is even more complex than that because it includes past, present,
future,… (11 categories) for each of the aggregates; see, “The Five Aggregates
(Panñakkhandha)“.
§ Note that pañcakkhandha is shortened for panaca khandha or “five heaps” or “five
aggregates”. In the same way, rūpa khandha is normally pronounced as rūpakkhandha, and
similarly vedanakkhandha, etc.
7. There are four factors that inevitably contribute to the arising any of the five aggregates: We can
easily guess the first two: avijjā and taṇhā. Because of avijjā (ignorance) of the true nature, beings
tend to attach to things via greed or hate (taṇhā). And those two are always in front. Now, because of
avijjā and taṇhā, beings initiate actions (kamma) via body, speech, and mind.
§ Thus, avijjā, taṇhā, and kamma are common to the arising of any of the five aggregates.
§ Then when any one of the five aggregates start arising, it will need another factor that helps in
the arising of that aggregate. Let us discuss that next.
8. A rūpa (material thing, whether alive or not) needs food (āhāra). A human or an animal needs to
eat (these are called kabalinka āhāra), and a tree needs nutrition from the ground. Even a thing like a
rock needs āhāra (not in the general sense of food) to be formed, and that is a very deep topic that we
will discuss much later.
§ Since rūpa khandha also includes “future rūpa” one may ask how would āhāra be associated
with a future rūpa. In this case, the āhāra is a mental āhāra; we will discuss four types of food
(āhāra) in the near future.
9. On the other hand, three of the mental aggregates (vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra) arise due to phassa
(contact), and thus phassa is considered a form a mental āhāra.
§ For any of those to arise, there has to be a contact (phassa) with the outside world either via
eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, or the mind.
§ Viññāṇa is the end result of a citta that includes vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and rūpa. Thus the
corresponding factor for viññāṇa is nāmarūpa. Even though in paṭicca samuppāda it is ,
“viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“, it goes the other way too, “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāṇa“. This is
called “annamanna paccaya“, and is valid for many such pairs in the paṭicca samuppāda.
10. Finally, the last factor is common to all five aggregates. In the deepest sense, any of the five
aggregates is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). And each thus has three common features: uppada
(early stage of arising), thithi (change while growing), bhanga (destruction). Thus the fifth factor that
describes a given aggregate is the uppada lakkhana or nibbathi lakkhana.
§ Note that some saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) (especially those belong to the rūpa khandha) can
have long lifecycles: a human lasts about 100 years, a universe lasts billions of years. But the
mental components have relatively short lifecycles, especially vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra are
very short-lived. Some viññāṇa are brief, but others can last long times.
§ Whether it is a human or a building (rūpa), a feeling, perception, saṅkhāra, or viññāṇa, they all
have those three characteristics of uppada, thithi, and bhanaga (i.e., nibbatti lakkhana).
11. It is easiest to discuss an example with the rūpa khandha, and take just a small part of it say a
human being (X) and an animal (Y). First let us start with the root causes for the birth of X or Y.
Those two beings, in one of their previous lives had acted (done a kamma) with taṇhā (which itself
was caused by avijjā).
§ That moral act (for X) and an immoral act (for Y) led to the corresponding bhava (human
bhava and animal bhava), which at some point led to the birth of a living being with
corresponding characteristics (gathi).
§ That resulted in the conception of a human baby (X) and a baby animal (Y) in a suitable womb.
They both grew by consuming food (āhāra) inside the womb initially and then outside the
womb after the birth.
§ Āhāra also can be an actual cause and we will discuss that in a future post.
12. The baby X or Y thus born, will now grow according to the blueprint (manomaya kāya) that took
hold of a single cell in the mother’s womb at conception. That manomaya kāya has the basic
blueprint of that being.
§ Growing and maturing of X or Y, now proceeds with the uppada (or nibbatti) lakkhana that
was associated with the particular manomaya kāya.
13. This same line of reasoning can be applied to other four khandha: Vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, and
viññāṇa also arise mainly due to avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, and also āhāra (food) for them.
§ I will discuss later what it means to say āhāra (food) for those mental elements. Actually, those
are much more important than the food for the physical body and any other rūpa.
§ Other four aggregates also arise, stay in existence for a time, and then is destroyed.
14. To summarize, the each of the five aggregates arise with the aid of five factors:
§ Rūpa: avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, āhāra, nibbatti lakkhana.
§ Vedanā: avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, phassa, nibbatti lakkhana.
§ Saññā: avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, phassa, nibbatti lakkhana.
§ Saṅkhāra: avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, phassa, nibbatti lakkhana.
§ Viññāṇa: avijjā, taṇhā, kamma, nama rūpa, nibbatti lakkhana.
15. Thus those are the 25 factors that describe how anything in this world arise. The udayavaya ñāṇa
encompasses the comprehension of those 25 factors.
§ There are 25 more factors that lead either to the destruction of something that arose OR lead to
the prevention of something from arising. We will discuss them in a future post.
§ Thus the udayavaya ñāṇa is said to encompass 50 factors altogether that contain all knowledge
about the arising and destruction of anything in this world, AND also the knowledge on how to
stop anything from arising (nirodha) in this world.
§ Thus with udayavaya ñāṇa one comprehends how suffering arises and how one can eliminate
future suffering. A key point here is that anything that arises (uppada) is not just guaranteed to
be destroyed (bhanga), but also that it changes unexpectedly (viparinama) during its existence
(thithi). It is the anicca nature.
Next in the series, “Nibbatti Lakkhana in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“.
6.4.15.
2
Nibbatti Lakkhana in Udayavaya Ñāṇa
February 26, 2016
1. In the previous post, we discussed the first 25 factors that encompass what is involved in the
“udaya” stage of udayavaya: “Udayavaya Ñāṇa – Introduction“. Each of the five aggregates has five
factors associated with it basically leading to its formation; thus there are 25 factors that give rise to
each person’s world.
§ The five aggregates or the pañcakkhandha is much more complex than most realize. Please
read the posts on pañcakkhandha to familiarize with it if you really want to grasp the
udayavaya ñāṇa: “The Five Aggregates (Panñakkhandha)“.
§ Also note that a given saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is a tiny fraction of pañcakkhandha. We
have discussed the five stages of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), and it is related to udayavaya
ñāṇa: “Root Cause of Anicca – Five Stages of a Sankata“. Buddha Dhamma is so deep, all
these different descriptions are well-connected at some level.
§ Do not worry if all this seems to be overwhelming (of course some people will be able to see
the connections). It will make sense with time. Just keep reading posts that you have already
read. They will make more sense each time you go back and read, especially after reading other
relevant posts.
2. It is important to grasp the fact that anything that we experience, we experience only for a fraction
of a second. Then it is gone to the “past pile” (atita; pronounced “atheetha”) of the five aggregates or
piles.
§ Anything that we are only imagining or hoping to experience has not yet materialized; those are
in the “future pile” (anāgata; pronounced “anāgatha”) of the five aggregates.
§ Only a negligibly small fraction is being experienced at a given moment: the “present
pile” (paccuppanna; pronounced “pachchuppanna”); see, “Five Aggregates – Introduction“.
3. All these things arise as a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), whether it is material (rūpa) or mental
(vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa). A given saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) itself (not the experience)
may exist for brief moment, or some may last a long time (especially those belonging to rūpa
aggregate). But even then parts of it are continually being “passed on” to the past.
§ Think about a human being X. He/she starts with a single cell and grows by the day, becomes a
baby, a child, a young person, an old person, and then is perished. So, when another person Y,
is watching X grow, the “rūpa khandha” of Y continuously grew, all the while making the
“past rūpa khandha” bigger each moment. When X is observing himself, that experience goes
to his “rūpa khandha“.
§ At a given time, we can see only a momentary “snapshot” of a rūpa khandha. When X dies, all
those stages –moment by moment — had gone to the past, and thus now belong to the “past
rūpa khandha” of X and Y. Note that they are different: each one’s experience of X is different.
§ Now we can see why each person’s pañcakkhandha is unique to that person.
4. Now we will analyze why all five aggregates have their origin in avijjā, taṇhā, and kamma:
Because we have the wrong perception (nicca saññā) that we can eventually reach happiness by
craving for things in this world (avijjā), we get attached to somethings or hate other things (taṇhā),
and then act accordingly (kamma).
§ After one attains parinibbana (i.e., when an Arahant dies), there is no world to experience. No
more pañcakkhandha.
5. The other two factors of āhāra and nibbatti lakkhana describe the “progression” of a
pañcakkhandha that have the origins in avijjā, taṇhā, and kamma.
§ If it is a material thing (rūpa) it needs āhāra (food) to grow; they can be food that living beings
eat or nutrients that plants need.
§ If it is a mental thing (vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra, viññāṇa), it needs “mental food”: phassa
(contact), mano sancetana, and viññāṇa āhāra. We will discuss these later.
6. Any one of those five aggregates needs a “blueprint” or a set mechanism to arise, grow, mature,
decay, and eventually cease to exist. This is what the fifth factor, nibbatti lakkhana, is about.
§ This “blueprint” is made according to those three causes: it is a complex plan which takes into
account many aspects that are formed by the level of avijjā (ignorance), kind of taṇhā (greed,
hate), and kamma (kind of acts that were done with body, speech, and mind).
§ Those complex factors give rise to nibbatti lakkhana, “blueprint” for any one of the five
aggregates to rise. It can be called “production characteristics” of that particular saṅkhata
(sankata in Sinhala) belonging to one of the five aggregates.
§ As we learn more, we will see that all five factors actually become causes, and are inter-related.
7. This is easier to see this with a human (or an animal). When a living being gets a human bhava,
then based on a specific kamma vipāka that came to focus at the time of death in the previous bhava,
a blueprint for the human bhava is automatically generated by kammic energy.
§ That blueprint is the manomaya kāya or the gandhabba that we have discussed many times;
see, the posts under the section “Manomaya Kāya“.
§ The arising of that human starting from a single cell in mother’s womb happens according to
the “blueprint” in that manomaya kāya: eventual height, eye color, skin color, etc were
determined when a suitable womb was automatically selected according to the “gathi” of that
being. That “selection process” — which happens automatically and not decided by any
superior being — had chosen the matching parents for the gandhabba.
§ That was the role played by the nibbatti lakkhana in this particular case.
8. Thus the particular bhava is determined by the particular action (kamma): if that action was
suitable for a dog bhava, then one would get a “dog bhava“.
§ But other characteristics of that dog are determined by the overall “gathi” of that being that it
had acquired through uncountable previous births.
§ Thus nibbatti lakkhana is a complex entity that takes into account numerous things, but two are
prominent: the specific kamma and overall gathi.
9. For example two different beings could get the same “dog bhava“. But no two dogs will look and
behave alike. Some are vicious and some are loving. Some are big and some are small. The possible
varieties are basically infinite. Even two “twin dogs” that look exactly the same will have at least
some behaviour differences when they grow. Same thing applies to two humans.
§ Thus nibbatti lakkhana is a complex mold of multiple factors. But only a Buddha can see why
certain features are in a given being. Even a spot on dog is said to be due to some reason.
§ Even though the “bhava” is determined by a specific strong kamma (called a janaka kamma),
the actual body will reflect numerous kamma vipāka from numerous lives in the past.
§ But as we have discussed elsewhere, what kinds of kamma vipāka can bring fruits will depend
to a large extent on having suitable conditions available. If one acts foolishly that will allow
some bad kamma vipāka from the past to bear fruit. In the same way, by acting with
mindfulness one can avoid such bad outcomes and even bring about good outcomes due to past
good kamma vipāka.
§ There are several posts that discuss the above important fact. For example, “What is Kamma? –
Is Everything Determined by Kamma?” and “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya“.
10. Therefore, it is important to realize that it is manomaya kāya does not determine one’s future
rigidly; some of the “production characteristics” can change. It is not like making a robot in a factory
according to a set blueprint.
§ It is easy to see that one’s body structure can change according to one’s lifestyle. If one
becomes careless and start eating indiscriminately, one will become obese. Even one’s
character can change by one’s motivation and due to external influences.
§ Thus nibbatti lakkhana are not deterministically set. The overall gathi can change and the
manomaya kāya and the physical body in turn can change.
11. The main reason for this flexibility is that the manomaya kāya has three “components”: kammaja
kaya, cittaja kaya, and utuja kaya; see previous posts on manomaya kāya.
§ The kammaja kaya is the one that is really pre-set. It had taken into account the reasons (kamma
vipāka) that led to the particular bhava.
§ The critical component that is under OUR CONTROL is the cittaja kaya. This is basically how
we think (that leads to our speech and bodily actions). And how we think depends on our level
of ignorance (avijjā).
§ The third component is the utuja kaya, which is basically the fine body of the gandhabba. It is
being created and changed CONTINUOUSLY due to both the kammaja kaya and cittaja kaya.
The fine matter based on suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] are being created due to kammaja kaya
and cittaja kaya; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
12. Thus the evolvement of a human being is a complex process. But one could get a good basic
understanding by comprehending the above basic structure. We will go into more details in the
future, but let us discuss a few more important aspects.
§ Now we can see that the physical body is just a “shell”. There is gandhabba inside that
physical body and controlling it; see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya
Kāya?“.
13. Thus, these physical bodies that we value so much are really lifeless shells. The essence —
gandhabba — is hidden inside that physical body.
§ The utuja kaya of the gandhabba is the one that is spread over the whole physical body gives it
a “life”. It is a fine grid that overlaps our nervous system, and that is how we feel body
sensations.
§ Under some extreme stresses, the gandhabba can get out of the physical body. This is what is
known as the out-of-body experience (OBE); see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“. When that happens the physical body is lifeless, and doctors have declared
many heart patients undergoing operations to be dead for several minutes only to find out later
that the patient is alive (gandhabba had returned to the body).
14. The critical point for our present discussion is the fact that once born with a human body, the
human gandhabba can determine its own nibbatti lakkhana to some extent by wisely using the cittaja
kaya.
§ It is this cittaja kaya that ultimately makes it possible for a human to attain Nibbāna.
§ One can change one’s gathi (habits/character) by comprehending first moral versus immoral,
and then comprehending the anicca nature of this world.
§ Most people do not realize the importance of the cittaja kaya. This is in essence why a Buddha
is needed to reveal the true nature of this world, and to teach how to use the cittaja kaya (i.e.,
the way one thinks, and therefore speaks and acts): First to stay away from immoral behavior to
cleanse the mind to some extent, and then to comprehend the anicca nature.
15. The nibbatti lakkhana for any saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) associated with any of the five
aggregates work similarly. Let us consider a certain viññāṇa that we experience when seeing a person
X.
§ That viññāṇa depends on who is looking at X. If it a loving parent for Y, then Y will generate a
“loving viññāṇa” upon seeing X. That viññāṇa will arise, stay there for a certain time, and fade
away as the mind is directed to something else. But when that viññāṇa arises , it arises with
some nibbatti lakkhana associated with one’s own past experiences with X. An enemy of X
(say, Z) could generate a “hateful viññāṇa“.
16. It is easy to see that other three aggregates in the above example will also arise accordingly.
§ Y will generate happy feelings (vedanā), will recognize (saññā) X as a parent, and may
generate some kind of action or speech via saṅkhāra. On the other hand, Z will generate an
entirely different set.
§ Thus the four mental aggregates are related to each other.
17. In Buddha Dhamma everything that we learn about is connected to each other at some level. It is
the whole fabric of nature. Each and every piece of information is part of a complex puzzle. When
one begins to see how it all fits together, one’s mind becomes joyful, and provides incentive and
desire to learn more about the true nature of this complex world.
Next in the series, “Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“.
6.4.15.
3
Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa
March 19, 2016
1. First part of the Udayavaya Ñāṇa involves the causes for the arising of saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) (and hence arising of pañcakkhandha). Out of the five main factors (avijjā, taṇhā, kamma,
ahāra, and nibbatti lakkhana), we discussed the nibbatti lakkhana in the previous post of the series.
§ Many posts at the site discuss the first three factors, so will now discuss the remaining factor,
ahāra (food), that is both a cause and a condition for the arising of pañcakkhandha.
2. When we think of ahāra (which means food in both Pāli and Sinhala), we automatically think
about food that we consume to stay alive. However, it is clear from the previous two posts that a
physical body is just a shell that is “controlled” by a gandhabba. There are many other posts on
gandhabba in the “Manomaya Kāya” section. Here is a summary of some concepts discussed there:
§ In effect, we have four kinds of bodies (kaya): the physical body (karaja kaya) is the one
people normally associate with the perception of a “me”. But we have three “mental bodies”
that are collectively “manomaya kāya” or “gandhabba“. Those three are kammaja kaya, cittaja
kaya, and utuja kaya.
§ In a way, the physical body is just a shell that we use for about 100 years or so and discard at
death; the gandhabba leaves that dead body and waits for a suitable womb to make another
physical body, if there is kammic energy left in the human bhava.
§ The foods for the physical body are called kabalinka āhāra. There are three other “mental
foods” that are consumed by the gandhabba.
§ The gandhabba consumes three kinds of mental food: phassa āhāra, mano sancetana āhāra,
and viññāṇa āhāra.
3. A given Kammaja kaya was created at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment by a powerful previous kamma,
and its energy just gets depleted with time. For example, if a particular human bhava came into
existence with enough kammic energy to support a human life for 1000 years, then that energy will be
slowly spent over 1000 years. In other words, kammaja kaya does not need any additional energy,
i.e., āhāra.
§ In a way, all three types of mental foods are consumed by the cittaja kaya. And some of the
energy from the kammaja and cittaja kaya are converted to suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
(matter), and that is what makes the fine body (utuja kaya) of the gandhabba, which is too fine
for us to see.
§ As I mentioned in the previous post is this section, “Nibbatti Lakkhana in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“,
the critical component that is under OUR CONTROL is the cittaja kaya. We can overcome our
“loosely preset destiny” embedded in the kammaja kaya by cultivating our cittaja kaya, or
basically our thoughts and thereby our behavior (gathi). This is what makes it possible to attain
Nibbāna!
4. Let us first discuss the kabalinka āhāra. There are two relevant meanings for this name. The first
meaning is associated with what this type of āhāra does: to energize the physical body. Here
“kabalinka” comes from “kayata bala dena” in Pāli or Sinhala where “kaya” is body, “bala” is
energy or power, and “dena” means provide.
§ Therefore, kabalinka āhāra here means the food we eat to make our bodies grow and keep
energized. Without food, a physical body that starts in the womb of the mother cannot grow to a
baby and then once comes out cannot grow to be an adult. Without kabalinka āhāra that
particular saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) cannot survive, and thus is an essential factor
contributing to part of the pañcakkhandha.
§ This kind of kabalinka āhāra is essential for the survival for humans and animals (and also
devas). Devas consume just one kind of kabalinka āhāra called “amurtha“; it is a drink that
they consume, which leaves no residuals. Thus, they don’t need to worry about sweating,
urinating, or defecating.
§ Thus kabalinka āhāra are needed only in kāma loka. As we will see below, when one loses
craving for kabalinka āhāra, one will never be born again in the kāma loka, i.e., one becomes
an Anāgāmī.
§ There are no solid bodies (karaja kaya) in either rūpa loka or arūpa loka. In rūpa loka there is
only the “thrija kaya” or the three mental bodies of kammaja kaya, cittaja kaya, and utuja kaya.
Thus in the rūpa loka beings are essentially gandhabbas but that term is normally reserved for
humans and animals when they are in the para loka waiting for a womb; see, “Hidden World of
the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)“.
§ In the arūpa loka, there is no utuja kaya either. Except for the hadaya vatthu, there is no rūpa
associated with an arūpa brahma.
§ It is not essential to know all these details, but these details are needed to complete the “big
picture”, especially for those who are interested in finer details.
5. The second meaning of kabalinka āhāra has a deeper meaning; here it is a CAUSE for the arising
of FUTURE saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). Craving kabalinka āhāra means one is hoping for rebirth
in the kāma loka to enjoy them; see, “How Perceived Pleasures (Assāda) lead to Dukkha“.
§ Thus, the stronger the craving is, harder it is to “escape from the kāma lokas“.
§ This is a good example of how (abhi)saṅkhāra or strong cravings/hopes/desires lead to
corresponding bhava and thus corresponding births (jathi).
§ In paṭicca samuppāda, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” is followed by “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“,
and leads to “upādāna paccayā bhava” and “bhava paccayā jathi“. Thus generating (abhi)
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
818 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
saṅkhāra for kabalinka āhāra leads to rebirths in the kāma loka, but most times in unexpected
way, as we discuss below.
6. One NEEDS to consume kabalinka āhāra to provide one’s body with the nutrients it needs to live
a healthy life. However, if one craves for tasty foods in excess, kabalinka āhāra can become a
CAUSE to for the arising (udaya) of future births in the kāma loka.
§ This is why it is NOT actual consumption of tasty foods that contributes to making “kāma
bhava“. It is the excess greed for tasty foods (kāma āsvada); see the section on , “Assāda,
Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
§ This second type of “pada nirukthi” or the “origin of the phrase” kabalinka āhāra comes from
“kaya bali karana” which means “leading to distorted body”. Here the word “bali” or “distort”
applies because the body that one acquires in a future life is due to such greedy saṅkhāra
could be much different than expected. This is the deeper meaning of kabalinka āhāra in the
udayavaya ñāṇa.
7. Such excessive greed for food matches the “gathi” of pretha beings. Thus when one cultivates such
greedy (abhi)saṅkhāra, it leads to corresponding “pretha bhava” and thus “pretha jathi” in the future.
§ When encountering delicious food, some people lose any sense of decency. The greediness
shows, and when eating such a meal some display “animal like” behavior, spilling food and
getting the food all over their face. That is a display of “greedy animal like” saṅkhāra. When
they cultivate such saṅkhāra, the corresponding birth could be that of a pig.
§ And then there are some who do not like to share such food and like to keep others away from
enjoying such meals. That could cultivate saṅkhāra of a “vicious dog”. We see such dogs all
the time; they growl when another dog comes even close to their food.
8. Once one gets the basic idea, it is easy to see various kinds of pretha and animal saṅkhāra can be
cultivated even without realizing it, and can lead to future births corresponding to such “gathi“.
§ And the cultivation of such extreme gathi is a consequence of not knowing or not
comprehending Buddha Dhamma, specifically paṭicca samuppāda (“pati ichcha” leading to
“sama uppada”); see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ And such saṅkhāra CANNOT be suppressed by sheer will power alone. One needs to learn
Dhamma and realize that they DO LEAD to bad consequences. Again, see the section on
“Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“.
9. There are “good births” in the kāma loka too: the human realms and the deva realm. Bhava (and
birth) in those realms also are according to one’s (abhi)saṅkhāra, which of course are generated
according to one’s dominant gathi.
§ Those who cultivate human and deva saṅkhāra like to enjoy sense pleasures, but they are not
excessively greedy. They don’t have mentality of “may all good things come to me, AND not
to others”. They are content with what they get and willingly share the excess with others.
§ One is not released from the kāma loka until one’s cravings for sense pleasures completely goes
away when one comprehends not only the futility of such sense pleasures but also the possible
dangers.
10. At even a deeper level, the tendency to generate such extreme greed goes away
AUTOMATICALLY when one starts comprehending the “anicca nature”. That it is not possible to
achieve and maintain pleasurable worldly things (including food or beautiful bodies that result from
eating such foods) as one desires.
§ And this change in the mindset and the change in corresponding personal behavior may not
reverse in a short time. But as one learns Dhamma, one will be able to see the change over time:
Sometimes in a few weeks or even several months.
§ The Buddha compared this “gradual transition” to the growth of a tree or a plant. One cannot
see the change in the growth of a plant day by day; there is no point in checking it every day to
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Three Levels of Practice 819
see whether can see the growth. But if one takes care of the plant by providing it with nutrients
and keeps the weeds away, one will be able to see the growth over a few weeks or months. And
then one day, can reap the benefits of all that work when the plant blossoms and provides the
flowers/fruits.
11. Therefore, the key is to LEARN Dhamma and also to comprehend it by contemplating on it,
which is MEDITATION. But it is critical to learn the correct Dhamma.
§ A good example of the wrong way to meditate is what many people are doing with the patikūla
manasikara bhāvanā. Many translate “patikūla” as “pilikul” in Sinhala, which means “to be
rejected because it is repulsive”. They meditate on contemplating the repulsiveness of the body
(sweat, urine, and feces generated by the body) and also the fact that once one chews on even
the most delicious food, it becomes “vomit”.
§ But the Buddha did not advice that. Just as we should not desire extreme sense pleasures, we
also should not be repulsed by the things that we mentioned in the above paragraph. They both
generate taṇhā, in the first instant by attachment (craving) and in the second by aversion
(paṭigha). The neutral mindset (upekkha) comes from understanding the true nature of things.
12. Now we can see that the connection of kabalinka āhāra in the udayavaya ñāṇa has two facets:
§ One plays a role in taking care of the physical body that we have inherited due to past causes. If
we are not mindful of what we eat, it can lead to bad consequences via the body that we already
have. If we are mindful, we can make that body to work optimally for achieving our goals, both
mundane and transcendental. And of course, if the physical body does not get enough kabalinka
āhāra, it will die.
§ The other is to be aware of the role kabalinka āhāra plays in generating physical bodies for us
in future births via generating (abhi)saṅkhāra related to pleasurable foods.
§ It is said that one can become an Anāgāmī (i.e., stop rebirths in the kāma loka) by
comprehending the true nature of kabalinka āhāra. Then one loses the craving for any sense
pleasures in the kāma loka. But such a mindset is unfathomable for a normal human who only
sees the immediate sense satisfaction. Furthermore, such a mindset CANNOT be achieved by
sheer will power; it has to be through understanding the anicca nature of kāma loka.
Next in the series, “Udayavaya Ñāṇa – Importance of the Cittaja Kaya“.
6.4.15.
4
Udayavaya Ñāṇa – Importance of the Cittaja Kaya
July 22, 2016; December 1, 2017
1. In previous posts in this series we discussed kabalinka āhāra for the physical body and three types
of āhāra for the “mental body” (or manomaya kāya or gandhabba): phassa āhāra, manosancetana
āhāra, and viññāṇa āhāra.
§ The manomaya kāya or the gandhabba consists of three components: kammaja kaya, citta kaya,
and utuja kaya. The kammaja kaya gets its energy at the beginning of that bhava, and does not
require any external āhāra. The utuja kaya is sustained continuously via fine rūpa produced
by kammaja kaya and cittaja kaya.
§ Therefore, the three types of āhāra for the manomaya kāya are all consumed by the cittaja
kaya. This cittaja kaya
is nothing else but the stream of thoughts that we generate.
§ An aside: Sometimes the gandhabba can inhale “aroma” or gandha (kabalinka āhāra) and
have a fine (misty) physical body too; thus the name gandhabba, where “abbha” means
“inhale”. Such “more solidified” are the ones that people can sometimes see, and even be
captured by a camera.
2. Now we can take a step back and look at the big picture, and it gives a very illuminating view. This
“big picture” could be very helpful in comprehending the anicca nature. Of course, this is not the
only way to grasp anicca nature.
§ The physical body that we value so much and think about as “me” is just a temporary shell. Just
like anything material in this world, it grows and peaks and then starts the downhill march
ending in decay and eventual death. At the death of physical body, the gandhabba that comes
out and has to wait for a suitable womb to start building a new body, if the human bhava still
has more kammic energy left; see, for example, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and
Births Therein” and “Gandhabba – Only in Human and Animal Realms“.
§ This is a key factor that contributed to the concept of a “self” (“āthma”) in Hinduism. Hindu
yogis who cultivated abhiññā powers could look back at a finite number of previous lives and
could see a gandhabba giving rise to repeated rebirths in human form (they likely practiced
jhāna in those recent previous lives, which made it easier for them to attain abhiññā powers in
this life).
§ However, they could not see far back enough to see that one could be born an animal or even
worse too.
3. For humans and animals, we can compare the physical body controlled by the gandhabba to a car
(or any other vehicle) being driven by a person. The body of the vehicle is like our physical body, and
the driver is analogous to the gandhabba. Without the gandhabba , the physical body cannot do
anything; it would be a lifeless, i.e., a dead body. It is the gandhabba that “operates” the human body;
see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
§ The gandhabba, in turn, arises due to the kammic energy that was created in a previous life; the
kammaja kaya represents that energy, and will be slowly depleting with time. The
term kammaja kaya comes from “kamma” and “ja” and “kaya“. Here “ja” means “birth” or
“origin” and “kaya” is body. Thus kammaja kaya means the “body that was created due to
kamma“.
§ Similarly, cittaja kaya arises due to citta (loosely translated as thoughts).
§ “Utu” means “change” and the utuja kaya is that part of the gandhabba body which arises by
conversion of kammic energy and the energy from citta (javana).
4. Now, we can see the critical importance of citta. Kammaja kaya itself arises due to previous
kamma, i.e., by citta in a previous lives. More specifically, javana in those citta provided the energy
for a new bhava which lead to the kammaja kaya; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental
Power“.
§ Kammaja kaya is just a result, and it will slowly lose its energy over the human existence. We
cannot do anything about (but if one does an anatariya kamma it will be shortened). Thus it is
only the cittaja kaya that we have control over. This is critically important. We have
finally converged to the essence of a human being.
§ This is why the Buddha said “Mano pubbangama Dhamma.…”. The origin of anything can be
traced back to the mind (thoughts).
§ Here we see the truth of the above statement for living beings. In the future, it will become
clear that ANYTHING in this world has origins that can be traced back to the mind. That is the
story in the Agganna sutta. But we have to proceed step-by-step.
5.We have the control over our own destiny via our thoughts or cittaja kaya. I cannot
emphasize enough the critical importance of the cittaja kaya.
§ Therefore, we have to pay attention to what kind of āhāra (conventionally translated as food,
but you can see that is not a good translation) that we provide for our thought stream. But we
have control over only those thoughts that we initiate.
6. There are two types of thoughts. Some citta arise due to kamma vipāka. For example, we may get
to taste a delicious meal due to a good kamma vipāka and while eating it we feel “jivha viññāṇa“, i.e.,
those come through our sense of taste. These do not have abhisaṅkhāra. Also see, “Vedanā (Feelings)
Arise in Two Ways“.
§ There is another set of citta that we initiate. For example, based on that tasty meal, we start
thinking about coming back to the same restaurant in the future, how to make it at home, etc.
These generate abhisaṅkhāra. The worst kind is apuññābhisaṅkhāra, where we think about
ways to get that meal in an immoral way, say, by stealing.
§ But if it is just some food that quenches the hunger, we do not generate that type of citta
subsequent to the vipāka citta.
§ In another example, we see millions of things in a day (via vipāka citta), but generate
abhisaṅkhāra only in a few.
7. The Buddha said, “kammā vipākā vaddanthi, vipākā kamma sambhavo, thasmā punabbhavo hothi,
evan loko pavaththathi“.
§ What that means is: “Because of kamma vipāka we experience sense inputs; based on those we
initiate new kamma (abhisaṅkhāra), and those in turn will bring vipāka in the future; that is
how the world evolves (rebirth process continues)”.
§ Thus the critical part is where we generate abhisaṅkhāra. This is done with javana citta. We
will discuss this using citta vīthi in the future, but let us try to get some basic understanding of
how these javana citta can be controlled. There are many posts in the “Mind and
Consciousness” and “Citta and Cetasika” sections on citta and citta vīthi.
8. In fact, these javana citta run too fast to control at that time. Billions of citta run in a second. How
can we control them? We cannot control them in situ, as they initially arise.
§ Those javana citta arise due to our gathi! This is the key.
§ For example, an Arahant will not be tempted by any attractive sense input. He has removed all
āsavas (cravings) and there is no anusaya to bubble up. He/she has “Noble gathi of an
Arahant“.
§ On the other hand, a Sotāpanna may be tempted by that attractive sense input. He has not
removed all āsavas (cravings); but he/she has removed gathi suitable for the apāyas, so javana
citta corresponding to highly immoral acts will not arise .
§ The āsava (or gathi) are analogous to the dirt in the bottom of a well. If the well water is
perturbed, some dirt can come to the surface (anusaya). (i.e., if a sense input matching our gathi
comes into play, bad thoughts automatically come into the mind). This is discussed in the post,
“3. The Second Level – Key to Purify the Mind” in the Meditation section.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, the worst types of “gunk” will be removed. The rest will
be removed in three more stages (Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, Arahant).
9. In a normal human, whether or not immoral javana citta will be triggered, will depend on his/her
set of āsavas (or gathi). If that particular sense input is attractive (i.e., matches his/her āsavas), then
he/she may automatically initiate a highly immoral act to pursue that sense input.
§ But the key here is that, even if such immoral javana citta arise, one can still suppress them if
one has learned Satipaṭṭhāna (or ānāpāna), before the actual act is done. For extremely
immoral acts, like killing another human, most people will be able to control such thoughts
even without knowing about Satipaṭṭhāna. But the more one learns Dhamma, and the more one
understands the consequences, one will be able to have more control even over minor offenses.
§ Furthermore, the more one controls one’s actions this way, the more one’s gathi will change for
the better. This is the another key! This has been discussed in detail in, “9. Key to
Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati)“. There are several posts under that
topic.
10. A large chunk of immoral gathi will be removed just via comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta
at the Sotāpanna stage. In fact those gathi that are suitable to be born in the apāyas will be removed.
This is called “dassanèna pahāthabbā“, i.e., “removal via correct vision”.
§ Thus highly immoral javana citta will not even be triggered in a Sotāpanna. Just like a well that
has been cleaned of the visible dirt at the bottom can not be muddied by perturbing the water in
that well, highly immoral thoughts do not arise in a Sotāpanna because “worst gunk” has been
removed from his/her mind.
§ But to be able to grasp anicca, dukkha, anatta, one’s mind needs to be cleansed to some extent.
Gradual changing of one’s gathi or āsava (via removing bad ones and by cultivating good ones)
needs to be done with Ānāpāna bhāvanā (or Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā) is needed even before the
Sotāpanna stage, and that needs to be continued until the Arahantship.
11. Thus the key to Nibbāna is in the uadayavaya ñāṇa: future rebirths arise (uadaya) due to
abhisaṅkhāra (or cetana) in our javana citta. By controlling immoral thoughts via reducing our āsava
(bad gathi), we can eventually stop them from arising.
§ This is done by always being vigilant about the moral or immoral thoughts that come to our
minds; this is Satipaṭṭhāna; see, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“. Then if the thought is moral, we
cultivate it (āna); if it is immoral, we stop it (pāna) before it leads to bad speech or actions; this
is Ānāpāna; see, “7. What is Änapāna?“.
§ The other key point is that the more cleans one’s mind, the more one will be able to
comprehend. In particular, comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta, REQUIRES a mind
cleansed to some extent.
§ I hope you can see that this is a feedback loop: each time one goes through the loop (being
vigilant or satipaṭṭhāna to cleansing the mind or ānāpāna to more cleansed mind to grasping
deeper Dhamma and back to being vigilant), one makes progress.
12. This effect is greatly amplified when one finally grasps Tilakkhaṇa: One comprehends the
futility of staying in this rebirth process (anatta), because anything that we acquire through much
effort cannot be kept to our satisfaction in the long run (anicca) and eventually lead to nothing but
suffering (dukha), and one can clearly see the need for urgency to reduce and remove one’s āsava
(bad gathi). This leads to the Sotāpanna stage.
§ A huge chunk of āsava (bad gathi) are removed just via this understanding of the anicca nature
at the Sotāpanna stage. One is permanently released from rebirth in the apāyas — the four
lowest realms — because highly potent immoral javana citta do not arise in the mind of
a Sotāpanna.
§ Thus with udayavaya ñāṇa, one can really clarify the path to the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Then the remaining āsava are removed (āsavakkhaya) via three more stages (Sakadāgāmī,
Anāgāmī, Arahant) by continuing this process (Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna), and one attains
Nibbāna, permanent happiness or the removal of all future suffering.
§ But one also need to do Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna before the Sotāpanna stage in order to
cleanse the mind to a level that is capable of grasping anicca, dukkha, anatta.
13. Finally, I would like to close the loop by pointing to the connection to concepts we have
discussed in the early posts. The gandabbhaya consumes three kinds of mental food: phassa āhāra,
mano sancetana āhāra, and viññāṇa āhāra.
§ As we saw in the previous post in this series, “Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“, all three
types of mental foods are consumed by the cittaja kaya. And this confirmed by the above
discussion: Our initial sense inputs that COULD trigger javana citta come via phassa, sense
contacts. They are JUST contacts. But based on those, we COULD accumulate new kamma
vipāka (abhisaṅkhāra) by making samphassa; also see, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two
Ways“.
§ Manosancetana āhāra (which are abhisaṅkhāra) come into play during those samphassa; this
simply means we start “making plans”, and also keep going back to that sense input. With
repeated triggers for a given sense input (samphassa) provides āhāra for that viññāṇa; for
example, see, “2. Viññāṇa (Consciousness) can be of Many Different Types and Forms“, and
other relevant posts.
By reading the links given (and also using the “Search box” at top right) one should be able to clarify
key issues. Please don’t hesitate to comment if you need help in clarifying a given concept.
14. Also, please make sure to enter your email address correctly when making a comment. Recently,
one person entered incorrect address, and sent me the same question twice. Unfortunately, I have no
way of letting him know that I replied each time.
It seems that the audio files are not loading, so just removed the audio files.
1/2/16:
It seems that the following conventions were adopted in order to make the text shorter.
In many cases:
Pronunciation Key
I will keep adding more words to the glossary. If you would like me to add any missing words to the
glossary, please send a comment.
10/6/15: I have added audio files. Please note the volume control below each audio.
Revised May 27, 2017: I have revised the Pāli words to align with the convention used by most
English texts. This convention was apparently adapted by the early European scholars (Rhys Davis
and others) in order to keep the length of the word short. I will use this convention in new posts, and
try to update old posts gradually.
This glossary is in two posts, because there are a total of over 400 Pāli words included now. This is
the first part of the glossary; second part at, “Pāli Glossary – (L-Z)“.
§ I have been able to get the audio files incorporated, and also have provided links to key posts
whenever possible/needed.
§ We also have a Popup Pāli Glossary with Pronunciation, thanks to Mr. Seng Kiat Ng. If that
GoldenDict dictionary is installed on your computer, you will be able to access this glossary
from each post directly. Furthermore, it could provide translations from other online
dictionaries as well.
Possible Confusion in Pronunciation
In most cases, I use the spelling for Pāli words that were adapted hundred years ago (by Rhys Davis
and others). For example, “anichcha” is written in English as “anicca”. It seems that this was done in
order to make the text shorter. That is a valid point, since otherwise some words could be very long
when written in English.
In many cases:
Pronunciation Key
Revised May 27, 2017: I have revised the Pāli words to align with the convention used by most
English texts. This convention was apparently adapted by the early European scholars (Rhys Davis
and others) in order to keep the length of the word short. I will use this convention in new posts, and
try to update old posts gradually.
This glossary in two posts, because there are a total of over 400 Pāli words included now. This is the
second part of the glossary; first part at “Pāli Glossary – (A-K)“.
§ I have been able to get the audio files incorporated, and also have provided links to key posts
whenever possible/needed.
§ We also have a “Popup Pāli Glossary with Pronunciation“, thanks to Mr. Seng Kiat Ng. If that
GoldenDict dictionary is installed on your computer, you will be able to access this glossary from
each post directly. Furthermore, it could provide translations from other online dictionaries as
well.
Possible Confusion in Pronunciation
In most cases, I use the spelling for Pāli words that were adapted hundred years ago (by Rhys Davis
and others). For example, “anichcha” is written in English as “anicca”. It seems that this was done in
order to make the text shorter. That is a valid point, since otherwise some words could be very long
when written in English.
In many cases:
Pronunciation Key
1. Pāli is a phonetic language. It does not have its own alphabet. Tipiṭaka was originally written down
in Pāli with the Sinhala alphabet.
§ Pāli verses are composed for ease of oral transmission. Tipiṭaka was orally transmitted
faithfully for several hundred years.
§ So, in many cases, root words are hidden in combined words in verses that were composed to
rhyme better for easy oral transmission.
2. Rather than trying to find roots in Sanskrit, that is the way to find the roots. As I explained with
evidence from the Tipiṭaka, the Buddha prohibited the use of Sanskrit words, or even to translate
the Tipiṭaka to Sanskrit; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma“.
§ That is because despite some similarities, Sanskrit many words were composed to sound more
“impressive”, without paying attention to embedded meanings.
§ For example, Pratītyasamutpāda is the Sanskrit term for Paṭicca Samuppāda.
Pratītyasamutpāda sounds impressive but the meaning is not clear at all.
§ On the other hand, it is clear in pati + icca leading to sama + uppāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda
– “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
3. Pali words are combined in ways to rhyme better. By finding key root-words embedded in such
“combined words”, one can easily figure out the meaning.
§ “yadaniccam tam dukkham, yam dukkham tadanattā” verse appears in many suttas.
§ In order to understand it, we need to “expand it” or “unfold it”: “yad aniccam tam dukkham,
yam dukkham tad anattā“.
§ Now the meaning becomes clear: “anicca nature leads to dukkha, dukkha nature leads to anatta
nature”; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
4. The following are some examples of combination of words to make a verse rhyme better for oral
transmission.
Naidham = na idham or “not the case”.
Ayamantimā jāti = ayam +antima + jāti or “my last birth”.
Nūppajjati = na + uppajjati: “will not arise”.
Cittappasāda = citta + pasāda; note the two p’s in the combined word that allow it to rhyme better.
Similarly in: Rūpakkhandha = rūpa khandha: “rūpa aggregate”.
Aveccappasāda = ava icca pasāda or “faith that leads to overcoming taṇhā (attachment)”.
Buddha = bhava + uddha: one who figured out how to stop existences (bhava) from arising.
Bhavaṅga = bhava + anga; intrinsic aspect of bhava.
Sakkāya = sath + kāya: good collections usually referring to the five aggregates. Sakkāya diṭṭhi is the
view that the five aggregates should be embraced.
Anāpāna = āna + āpāna: “taking in” and “putting out”.
Note the pronunciation of the following words sort of backwards to rhyme better:
§ Anāgāmi = na āgāmi: not coming back (in reference to not to come back to kāma loka for a
person who has attained the Anāgāmi stage of Nibbāna.
15 Sambuddha san + bhava uddha is rooting out one who rooted out existence in
+ uddha 31 realms
16 Sambodhi state attained by a sambuddha;
Nibbāna
creation of bhūta via "san" in the
17 Sambhūta san + bhūta bhūta
bhūta
refers to satara mahā mind; The Origin of Matter –
Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]
18 Sammapañña sammā
pañña
+ pañña is wisdom wisdom to see the way to remove
"san"
Sammā-
19 Sambodhi Emphasizing the achievement reserved for the Buddhas
(Sammā- of sambodhi on one's own
Sambuddha)
20 Sammatta san+mā+atta atta means the "truths leading
to sammā"
Sammatta niyama is a knowledge
of a Sotāpanna.
san
21 Sambojjanga +bodhi+anga;
rhymes as "anga" means factors Factors that lead to Sambodhi
sambojjanga
22 Sampajāna san + pajāna pajāna is to comprehend to figure out defilements (san)
(Sampajanna)
23 sammappadhā san + mā+ mā is to remove; padhāna first to do to remove "san"
na padhāna means "first"
24 Sambandha san + bandha bandha
with
is to bind, associate bind with someone/something
with "san"
25 sambhāvitā san + bhāvitā bhāvitā is to use engage in "san" or sense pleasures
26 Sambheda san + bheda bheda means to quarrel fighting over pleasurable things
or "san"
27 Sambhīta san + bhīta
bhīta means to terrify "san" leading to terror (in mind or
in future births)
28 Sambhoga san + bhoga bhoga means pleasurable
things, especially food sense pleasures
29 Sambhunjati san + bhunja bhunja
consume
means to eat or engage in sense pleasures
30 sammoha san + moha moha is delusion extreme delusion
to clarify what is "san", as in
31 sampādesi /
sampādeta san + pādesi pādesi is to sort out and see "vaya dhammā saṅkhāra,
appamādena sampādeta".
32 sampahanseti san +pahāna pahāna is to remove to remove "san"
33 sampañño san + pañño pañño means with wisdom,
possessive of paññā attained wisdom to see 'san"
34 Sampajāna san + pajāna pajāna is to clarify sort out or to clarify "san"
35 sampayoga san + payoga payoga is a clever plan to get
something done plan to access a pleasurable thing
36 Samphassa san + phassa contact with san (in the mind) Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two
Ways
37 Sampassati san + passati passati means to comprehend comprehend "san'
38 sankiliṭṭha or san + kilittha kilittha is to defile making mind defiled by adding
saṃkiliṭṭha "san"
39 sankilesa or san + kilesa kilesa are defilements things that defile the mind
saṃkilesa
40 Samsāra san + sāra sāra means "good" perception that san (things in this
(Saṃsāra) world) are good.
41 Sanseva san + seva seva means to "associate" to indulge in worldly pleasures
(Samseva)
Samucceda ucceda means to "remove
42 (as in san + ucceda from the roots"; pahāna is samucceda pahāna means to "get
samucceda remove rid of permanently"
pahāna)
43 saṃyoga or san + yoga yoga is to bind bound with "san" (to this world)
sanyoga
44 saṃyojanā or san + yo +ja "yo' is to bind; "ja" is to factors that leads to bonds to
sanyojanā produce rebirth process
45 samudaya san + udaya udaya is to arise arising due to "san"
Samutthāna citta is same as
46 Samutthāna san + utthāna utthāna
arises"
means "where it cittaja; where "san" originates
(mind)
47 samvāsa
sanvāsa
or san + vāsa vāsa live with live together; sexual intercourse
48 Samvara
(Sanvara) san + vara vara means to stop, avoid moral behavior
49 Samvaddha san + vaddha vaddha is to "grow" to add "san", i.e., defilements
50 Samvannanā san + vannanā is to praise to praise immoral acts
vannanā
51 Samvattana
(Samvattati) san + vattana vattana is to "drop" aiding in removing "san"
52 samvedanā
sanvedanā
or san + vedanā vedanā is to feel feelings due to "san": samphassa
jā vedanā
53 saṃvidhāna
or sanvidhāna san + vidhāna vidhāna means ordering giving orders, organize (normally
used mundanely)
54 saṃsaraṇa
sansaraṇa
or san + sarana sarana
travel
means move around, wandering in saṃsāra
Saṃyutta
55 (as in
Saṃyutta san + yutta yutta means "contains" Suttas in the Saṃyutta Nikāya
explain "san" terms
Nikāya)
56 Sancetanā san + cetanā cetanā is intention (in a
thought) defiled thoughts
57 sanditthika san + diṭṭhi diṭṭhi is seeing, vision seeing "san" with Buddha
Dhamma
58 Sangāyanā san + gāyanā gāyanā is to recite Buddhist Council where suttas
describing "san" are recited.
59 Sanga san + ga ga is to attach, attach to "san"
60 Sangati san + gati gati is character, habit bad character/habits
Those who have removed "san"
61 Saṅgha san + gha gha is to remove belong to Sanhga; Nobles or
Ariyas, but usu. include bhikkhus
62 Sāṅghika possessive of offered to Saṅgha
Saṅgha
63 Sangīta
(Sangeetha) san + gīta gīta is a poem, song music that bend mind towards
sense pleasures
64 sankalpana
sankappa
or san + kalpana kalpnana
thoughts
means conscious defiled thoughts
65 sankhitta san + kitta kitta is action (kriya) anything done with
'san' (defilements) in mind
san + sûn (û calming the mind via removing
66 Sansun rhymes like sûn means to destroy "san"
put)
67 Sanvara san + vara vara is to stay away from discipline via staying away from
"san", i.e., moral behavior
68 sanvega
samvega
or san + vega vega is speed or rapidity enhanced javana of a citta due to
"san", i.e., highly emotional
saṅkhāra kāra is action (all actions are Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means
69 (should really san + kāra initiated via thoughts)
be sankāra)
70 Sankata san + kata kata is a result produced via saṅkhāra; anything
in this world
71 Sansāra
(Saṃsāra) San + Sāra Sāra is good, beneficial What is “San”? Meaning of
Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)
72 Santāpa san + tāpa tāpa is heat heating of the mind due to "san"
73 Santutti (or san + thutti thutti is to remove: Arogya ease of mind when "san"
removed; but commonly used to
Santhutti) Parama Labha.. indicate happiness
Revised: October 29, 2015; August 31, 2017; June 3, 2018; July 31, 2018
There are three main types of citta here: The differentiation is based on whether they have immoral
roots (lobha, dosa, moha), kammically moral roots (alobha, adosa, amoha), or are kammically
neutral, i.e., no roots.
§ 12 immoral citta: 8 with lobha roots; 2 with dosa roots; 2 with moha roots. All ten immoral
acts (dasa akusala) are done with these 12 types of cittas. Because of these 12 types of immoral
cittas, 7 rootless (ahetuka) vipāka cittas can arise in the future. Thus altogether there are 19
cittas in this category.
§ 8 moral cittas: 4 with all three moral roots and 4 with two moral roots (lacking in wisdom).
They can give rise to two types of vipāka citta: 8 vipāka cittas with no roots, and 8 vipāka
citta with moral roots (4 of them have all three moral roots and other 4 are lacking in wisdom).
Thus 24 types of citta are mentioned here, from which 16 have moral roots and 8 are rootless
(ahetuka).
§ When these same 8 moral citta arise in Arahants, they are called kriya citta or functional
citta. They just have the same moral roots as the 8 moral citta mentioned above, but do not have
any kammic potential or kammic consequences.
§ All those citta with moral roots (8 kriya cittas for Arahants and 16 for others) are called
sobhana (beautiful) citta.
§ Finally, there are 3 types of kiriya citta that arise in citta vīthi which are neither kamma nor
kamma vipāka. These are the 3 kriya citta without any roots, and thus are rootless (ahetuka)
citta. Two of these perform functions of (i) five-sense-door adverting consciousness
(pancadvaravajjana citta) and the vottapana citta, and (ii) mind-door-adverting consciousness
(manodvaravajjana citta). (iii)The third one arises in only Arahants (when they smile about
sense-sphere phenomena).
§ Note that none of the 7 akusala vipāka citta has roots. Also, 8 kusala vipāka citta associated
with pavutti vipāka (i.e, not giving rise to rebirth) also do not have any roots. Those 15 citta
together with the three ahetuka kiriya citta are involved in the vipāka phase of a given citta
vīthi. They do not have any sobhana or asobhana cetasika other than the 7 universal cetasika
and the 6 pakinnaka (particualrs) cetasika; see, “Cetasika – Connection to Gathi” for various
types of cetasika. These 18 citta are listed on p. 112 of Ref.1 under the second group below the
group of akusala citta.
Those 54 kamaloka citta can be categorized in different ways.
Asobhana (Unbeautiful) Sobhana (Beautiful)
Immoral- 12 Rootless – 18 Moral -24
Lobha (8) Immoral Vipāka (7) Moral (8)
Dosa (2) Moral Vipāka (8) Moral Vipāka (8)
Moha (2) Kriya (3) Kriya (8)
1. There are only 15 citta that are predominantly present in the Rupaloka. Five are jhānic moral citta
and five are vipāka cittas due to those.
2. The five jhānic moral citta can be experienced by humans when they develop samādhi and attain
these (first through fifth) jhānas. However, they can experience the corresponding five vipāka citta
only when they are born in Rupalokas.
3. The five jhānic states are characterized by five jhāna factors or mental concomitants: vitakka
(initial application), vicara (sustained application), pīti (zest), sukha (happiness), and ekaggata (one-
pointedness). All five factors are present in the first jhāna, and as one moves to higher jhānas, these
factors are lost one by one, and in the fifth jhāna only ekaggata is left.
Pīti (zest) is the happiness in the mind and sukha (happiness) is the tranquility of the body.
4. There are five more jhānic kriya citta experienced by Arahants when they attain these jhānas.
Thus there are 15 citta in all that predominantly belong to the Rupaloka.
Citta for Arupaloka (in the 4 Arūpa realms)- 12 in all
1. There are only 12 citta that are predominantly present in the Arupaloka. Four are jhānic moral citta
and four are vipāka citta due to those.
2. The four jhānic moral citta can be experienced by humans when they develop samādhi and attain
these (fifth through eighth) jhānas. However, they can experience the corresponding four vipāka citta
only when they are born in Arupaloka.
3. The first of the four Arupaloka jhānas is the attainment of the base of infinite space
(Akasanancayatana). A human needs to master the fourth jhāna (Rupaloka) in order to be able to
attain this jhāna.
The second is the base of infinite consciousness (vinnanacayatana). The third is the base of
nothingness (akincannayatana), and the fourth is the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception
(n’ evasanna n’asannayatana). In this last type of consciousness, the factor of perception (saññā) is
so subtle that it can no longer perform the function of perception, i.e., one is unaware of the “world”.
Yet perception is not altogether absent. This is another reason why the ancient yogis erroneously
assumed this eighth jhāna to be Nibbāna.
4. There are four more Arupaloka jhānic kriya citta experienced by Arahants when they attain these
jhānas.
Thus there are 12 citta in all that predominantly belong to the Arupaloka.
Lokuttara (Supermundane) Citta – 8 in all
1. These pertain to the four stages of Nibbānic attainment: Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, and
Arahant.
2. Each stage involves two types of citta: one is path consciousness (magga citta), and the other is
fruition consciousness (phala citta).The magga citta has the function of eradicating or permanently
attenuating defilements. The phala citta has the function of experiencing the degree of liberation
made possible by the magga citta.
3. Each magga citta arises only once, and endures for one thought-moment. It is never repeated. The
corresponding phala citta (which corresponds to a vipāka citta, but is not called a vipāka citta) arises
immediately after the magga citta. This is in contrast to mundane vipāka cittas where they can occur
even many lifetimes after the corresponding kusala or akusala citta.
4. The phala citta can be repeated any time after one attains it. With practice, it can be sustained for
long times, up to 7 days for an Arahant.
Thus, there are 54 + 15 + 12 + 8 = 89 citta in all.
How 121 Types of Citta are Possible
1. It is possible to further analyze the types of citta by refining the above method by taking into the
fact that each magga phala can be reached from the vicinity of each jhānic state.
§ One can attain Nibbanic states via the vicinity of each of the five rupaloka jhānic states (here
the Abhidhamma method of 5 jhānas is used, instead of four mentioned in the suttas, where
the first two jhāna in Abhidhamma categorization are taken to be one jhāna; in the
Abhidhamma analysis vitakka and vicara are removed in two steps, whereas in the sutta
analysis it is assumed that they are removed in one step).
§ Therefore, each of the five jhānic states can lead to the four magga cittas and four phala cittas.
§ Thus here there are 40 ways to attain lokuttara cittas. Therefore, the total number of citta in this
case would be 121 (= 54 + 15 + 12 +40) instead of 89.
2. Therefore, magga phala (including the Arahant stage) can be reached via going through any
of the jhānic states or without going through any jhānic state.
§ Of course, the 8 lokuttara citta (i.e., the four stages of Nibbāna) arrived are the same,
regardless of whether arrived via jhāna or not.
Important Conclusion Regarding Jhāna and Magga Phala
From the above it is clear that magga phala can be attained without jhāna (89 citta analysis
Magga phala can also be attained via each of the five jhānic states (in the Abhidhamma
applicable).
method), which correspond to the 4 jhānas discussed in the suttas; here the 89 citta analysis is
applicable.
§ Furthermore, these jhānic states can be reached via either anariya jhāna or Ariya jhāna.
The experience seems to be the same.
§ The only difference is that while kāma rāga is suppressed (vikkhambhana pahāna) in anariya
jhāna, it is REMOVED (samucceda pahāna) in Ariya jhāna.
§ For details, see, “Samādhi, Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
REFERENCE
Cetasika (mental factors; pronounced “chethasikā”) appear concomitantly with citta (thoughts;
pronounced “chiththā”), and they cease together with citta. They define the character (good or bad or
neutral) of the citta.
§ The way to “Lead a Moral Life“, or to “Seek Good Rebirths“, or to “Seek Nibbāna“, is to get
rid of the bad (un-beautiful) cetasikas and to cultivate good (beautiful) cetasikas. This is done
by changing one’s habits via learning Dhamma and practicing it: see, “Habits and Goals“,
“Sansāric Habits and āsavas“, and “The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of āsavas“, in that order.
1. There are 7 cetasikas that are in each and every citta. These are called universals or
sabbacittasadharana:
§ Phassa (contact); vedanā (feeling); saññā (perception); cetana (volition); Ekaggata (One-
pointedness) can become sammā samādhi; jivitindriya (life faculty) manasikara (memory).
2. Since they are universals, the above cetasikas appear in both kusala and akusala citta. All are
important mental factors:
§ Saññā and vedanā are in pañcakkhandha.
§ Cetana determines kamma; it is the cetasika that “puts together a citta” by automatically
incorporating other relevant cetasikas according to one’s “gathi“.
§ Ekaggata is the salient factor in samādhi.
§ Consciousness cannot arise without phassa. Note that samphassa is different from phassa; see,
“Difference between Phassa and Samphassa“.
§ Jivitindriya maintains life, and
§ Manasikara can be either yoniso manasikara (important in attaining the Sotāpanna stage), and
ayoniso manasikara can lead to accumulation of akusala kamma.
3. There are six cetasikas that also CAN appear in both types of cittas: kusala and akusala. However,
they are found in only particular types of cittas. They are called particulars or pakinnaka:
§ vitakka (focused application) can become sammā sankappa; vicara (sustained application);
adhimokkha (dominate). Adhimokkha is the cetasika that makes another cetasika in the citta to
dominate; for example, to get uddhacca, vicikicchā, or paṭigha to strengthen.
§ viriya (effort) can become sammā vayama ; pīti (joy); chanda (desire, not greed).
§ These are important cetasika and play key roles in morality/immorality since they can
appear in both kusala and akusala citta. For example, when one’s mind is covered with deep
ignorance (moha), one may enjoy immoral deeds (pīti), makes a liking for them (chanda), and
strive more (viriya) to do such acts.
4. Just like universals, these particulars can appear in either type of cittas, kusala or akusala. Vitakka,
vicara, and pīti are jhāna factors as well.
§ Viriya and chanda are two factors in the four bases of mental power; see, “The Four Bases of
Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“.
§ Adhimokka is important in decision making by making another cetasika dominant. All these
factors can go in the immoral direction too.
5. There are 14 asobhana cetasikas (non-beautiful mental factors) that appear only in akusala citta.
Out of these, there are four universals that appear in ALL akusala citta:
§ Moha (delusion); Ahirika (shamelessness); Anottapa (fearlessness in wrong); uddhacca
(restlessness or agitation).
§ Both shamelessness and fearlessness of wrong encourage doing immoral acts. Restlessness
causes unwise decision making.
The other 10 are occasionals that appear in only particular types of akusala citta:
§ Lobha (greed); diṭṭhi (wrong view); māna (conceit); dosa (hatred); issa (envy); maccariya
(avarice, also pretending one does not have wealth); kukkucca (worry, also feeling low); Thina
(sloth, sluggishness); middha (torpor); vicikicchā (doubt arising from temptations).
§ Lobha and dosa are two of the three immoral roots. Sloth and torpor normally rise together and
are opposite of viriya; they are listed as one factor in Five Hindrances; see, “Key to Calming
the Mind“.
6. There are 25 sobhana cetasika (beautiful mental factors), and 19 of them appear in each and
every kusala citta, and thus are called beautiful universals:
§ Saddhā (faith); sati (moral mindfulness) can become sammā sati; hiri (shame of wrong);
ottappa (fear of wrong); alobha (generocity); adosa (loving kindness); tatramajjhattata
(neutrality of mind); kayapassaddhi (tranquility of mental body); cittapassaddhi (tranquility of
consciousness); kayalahuta (lightness of mental body); cittalahuta (lightness of consciousness);
kayamuduta (malleability of mental body); cittamuduta (malleability of consciousness);
kayakammanuta (wieldiness of mental body); cittakammanuta (wieldiness of consciousness);
kayapagunnata (proficiency of mental body); cittapagunnata (proficiency of consciousness);
kayujjukata (rectitude of mental body); cittujjukata (rectitude of consciousness).
§ There are three abstinences: sammā vaca (right speech); sammā kammanata (right action);
sammā ajiva (right livelihood).
§ Two Illimitables (limit-less): karuna (compassion); mudita (appreciative joy; joy at other’s
moral success).
§ Paññā or pannindriya (wisdom or wisdom faculty). Sammā diṭṭhi leads to paññā.
§ Nipphanna rūpa are caused by kamma, citta, utu (tejo), and āhāra (oja). The other 10
(anipphanna rūpa) are not caused or conditioned by kamma, citta, utu (tejo), and āhāra (oja).
§ All the 28 rūpas arise in the kāma-realms. Eight rūpas comprising sadda, five vikara-rūpas,
jaratarupa and aniccata-rūpa, do not arise at the moment of birth (paṭisandhi) whereas, during
life time, there is no rūpa which is not formed.
§ In the 15 rūpa realms, with the exception of Asanna-realm, 23 rūpas arise (ghāṇa-pasāda,
jivhā-pasāda, kāya- pasāda, itthi-bhava and purisa-bhava being excluded).
§ Only 17 rūpas arise in the Asanna realm; they are 8 avinibbhogas (4 mahā bhūta, vanna,
gandha, rasa, oja), jivita, akasa dhatu, 3 lahutadi, 4 lakkhana- rūpas;
§ No rūpa (except hadaya vatthu) arise in the arūpa-realms; thus a trace of matter is present
anywhere in the 31 realms. Ancient yogis, who attained all eight anariya jhānas, could not see
any rūpa in the arūpa loka and deduced that was Nibbāna. But rūpa still have a “foothold” in
the arupaloka since any being in the arupaloka will be reborn in other realms in the future
(unless at least the Sotāpanna stage is attained); thus linkage to materiality has not been
severed.
1. Rūpa (or matter) can be generated by four causes: kamma, citta, utu, and Āhāra (food). I will
discuss these in detail later.
§ Kamma here refers to volition (cetana). The 25 kinds of kamma that produce rūpas are the
volitions of the 12 akusala cittas, 8 great kusala cittas, and the five rupaloka kusala cittas.
These rūpa are created with a time lag, when kamma vipāka bear fruits, like at the paṭisandhi to
a new life. The three rūpa dasaka of vatthu, kaya, and bhava are created at paṭisandhi by
kamma vipāka.
§ The rūpa produced by the cittas arise at the same time as the citta themselves, and only at the
rising part of the cittas. Out of the 89 possible cittas, 75 cittas can produce rūpa (4 arupaloka
vipāka cittas and the two sets of fivefold sense consciousness cannot produce rūpa).
§ Thus both kammaja and cittaja rūpa have mind as the direct cause. Both of these decay rapidly
and are converted to utuja rūpa. What we normally see are the utuja rūpa and aharaja rūpa,
which have their origins also in the great elements of tejo and oja.
§ The great element tejo is responsible for producing utu samutthana rūpa: Beginning from the
moment of rebirth-linking, the internal tejo element found in the rūpa kalapas born of kamma
combines with the external tejo and starts producing organic material phenomena originating
from tejo. Thereafter the tejo element in the rūpa kalapas born of all four causes produces
organic material phenomena born of tejo element throughout the life. Externally, tejo element
also produces inorganic material phenomena, such as climatic and geological transformations.
§ The nutritive essence, oja, is present in all rūpa-kalapas both inside the body (internal) and
outside the body (external). The external food, which is eaten, is digested in the stomach and
dispersed through blood to all parts of the body. So the internal oja and the external oja meet in
every part of the body. The combination of internal and external oja produce aharaja rūpas.
2. The 8 rūpas of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, vanna, gandha, rasa, and oja are ALWAYS found together.
That unit or kalapa is the smallest rūpa unit and is called the pure octad (suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka]). Those 8 rūpas and the akasa dhatu are produced by all four causes.
3. The four lakkhana rūpas of upacaya, santati, jarata, and aniccata are not produced by any cause.
They represent the nature of rūpas.
4. The remaining 15 rūpa are produced by different combination of the four possible causes as shown
in the table below:
Kamma Born Citta Born Utu Born Āhāra Born
Cakkhu (eye) Yes
Sota (ear) Yes
Ghana (nose) Yes
Jivha (tongue) Yes
Kaya (body) Yes
Sadda (sound) Yes Yes
Itthi Bhva Yes
(femininity)
1. The 28 types of rūpa are not found separately in nature. They are produced by the four causes in
the form of tiny material groups called kalapas. Kalapas have the following four features:
1. All the rūpas in a kalapa arise together, i.e. they have a common genesis.
2. They also cease or dissolve together, i.e. they have a common cessation.
3. They all depend on the four great essentials present in the kalapa for their arising, i.e. they have
a common dependence.
4. They are so thoroughly mixed that they cannot be distinguished, i.e. they co-exist.
2. It should be noted that kalapas are so small that they are indistinguishable from pure energy. The
ultimate rūpa is formless and massless. Science has shown that the smallest “particle” detected,
Higgs boson, is indistinguishable from energy.
3. There are 21 types of kalapas:
9 kammaja kalapas 6 cittaja kalapas 4 utuja kalapas 2 aharaja kalapas as shown below:
Kamma Born Citta Born Utu Born Āhāra Born
Cakkhu dasaka Yes
(eye decad)
Sota dasaka Yes
(ear decad)
Ghana dasaka Yes
(nose decad)
Jivha dasaka Yes
(tongue decad)
Kaya dasaka Yes
(body decad)
Itthi dasaka Yes
(female decad)
Purisa dasaka Yes
(male decad)
Vatthu dasaka Yes
(base decad)
Jivita navaka Yes
(vital nonad)
Suddhattaka Yes Yes Yes
(pure octad) (cittaja only) (utuja only) (aharaja only)
Kayavinnati navaka Yes
(body intimation nonad
Vacī vinnati sadda
dasaka (vocal intimation Yes
decad)
Lahutadi eka dasaka Yes Yes Yes
(undecad of mutability)
Kayavinnati Lahutadi
dva dasaka Yes Yes
(undecad of mutability)
Vacivinnati Sadda
Lahutadi terasaka Yes
(tridecad of mutability)
Sadda navaka Yes
(sound decad)
4. Internal and External Kalapas
All the 21 rūpa kalapas mentioned above occur internally in living beings. Itthibhava-dasaka does
not occur in males. Similarly, pumbhava-dasaka does not occur in females. For those who are born
blind or deaf, cakkhu-dasaka or sota-dasaka are not present.
In the external (bahiddha) world, only the two utuja-kalapas are found. All inanimate things such
as trees, stones, earth, water, fire, corpses, etc., are made up of utuja-suddhatthaka kalapas. The
sounds produced by beating two sticks together or by rubbing of branches in the wind or by musical
instruments such as violin, piano, radio, cassettes, etc., are utuja-sadda-navaka kalapas.
From the internal rūpas, kaya-pasada, bhava-rūpa (femininity and masculinity), cittaja-rūpa,
utuja-rūpa and aharaja-rūpa spread all over the body, and so they will be present in the eye, the ear,
the nose, the tongue and in every part of the body.
5. Rūpa in Kamaloka
All the 28 material qualities occur undiminished, if circumstances permit, in an individual during a
lifetime in kamaloka (sense-sphere).
In womb-born creatures, only three kammaja-kalapas comprising body-decad, sex-decad and heart
decad are manifested at the moment of conception (at paṭisandhi).
Here again the sex-decad may not be manifested in some particular individuals. After conception,
during life, the eye-decad and the rest are manifested slowly in due order. Of the groups of material
qualities which are produced in four ways, kammaja-rūpa starts to form at the moment of conception
and it goes on forming incessantly at every minor-instant. Cittaja-rūpa begins to form from the
second moment of consciousness, i.e. from the arising instant of the first bhavaṅga which follows the
rebirth-consciousness. Cittaja-rūpa continues to be formed at every arising instant of the subsequent
cittas for the whole life-time.
Utuja-rūpa starts to form from the existing instant of rebirth consciousness. The reason is that the
tejo-dhatu (utu) present in the first kammaja-kalapas comes to the static stage (thithi) at that instant.
From that time onwards, the tejo-dhatu then produces utuja-rūpa at every minor-instant. Since tejo-
dhatu is present in every kalapa, every kalapa, from the time it reaches the static stage, produces new
utuja-kalapas at every minor instant. And the new utuja- kalapas, from the time they reach the static
stage, again produce new utuja-kalapas at every minor instant. So this process goes on forever.
Every kalapa also contains the nutritive essence, oja. But aharaja-rūpa starts to form when internal
oja meets external oja at the time of diffusion of nutritive essence and the combination of internal and
external oja comes to the static stage. From that instant, aharaja-rūpa is also formed at every minor
instant. As new groups of material qualities are incessantly produced, old groups dissolve and
disappear when their lifetime of 17 conscious-moments is over. Thus, the material phenomena go on
uninterruptedly in the sense-sphere till the end of life like the flame of a lamp, or the stream of a
river.
Material Phenomena at Death: At the time of death, psychic life and physical life must cease
together. This means that all kammaja-rūpa which contains physical life must cease at the time of
death. So at the arising instant of the seventeenth citta reckoned backward from the death-
consciousness (cuti-citta), the last kammaja-rūpa is formed. This last kammaja-rūpa will cease at the
dissolving instant of the death-consciousness. Cittaja-rūpa is formed till the arising instant of the
cuti-citta. This last cittaja-rūpa will have lasted for a conscious-moment at the dissolution of cuti-
citta, and thus will perish in another sixteen conscious-moments which happens almost instantly.
aharaja-rūpa is formed till the dissolving instant of the cuti-citta, because the support required for
the formation of aharaja-rūpa can be furnished by citta up to that time. So at death, that last-formed
aharaja-rūpa has lasted for only one minor-instant. However in another fifty minor instants (rūpa-
lifespan – 51 minor instants or 17 conscious-moments), that aharaja-rūpa also ceases. Thus at the
time of death, kammaja-rūpa, cittaja-rūpa and aharaja-rūpa cease almost instantly.
But utuja-rūpa goes on forming and dissolving till the corpse is converted into dust. A corpse
consists of only utuja-rūpa.
So when a person dies and is reborn in another life, material phenomena similarly arise starting from
the instant of conception and go on arising till the time of death.
Arising of Material Phenomena in Rūpa-planes In the rūpa-plane, nose-decad, tongue-decad,
body-decad, sex decad and aharaja-kalapas do not arise. At the time of opapātika rebirth, there arise
four kammaja-kalapas namely, eye-decad, eardecad, heart-decad and vital-nonad. During life,
however, cittaja-kalapas and utuja-kalapas also arise. To the Asanna brahmas, eye-decad, heart-
decad and sound-nonad (sadda-navaka) do not arise. Also, cittaja-kalapas do not arise. Therefore, at
the time of their opapātika-rebirth, only the vital-nonad (jivita-navaka) arises. During life, utuja-
kalapas, with the exception of the sound-nonad, arise in addition.
Thus in kāma-loka and rūpa-loka, the process of the arising of material phenomena should be
understood in two ways, that is (1) at rebirth and (2) during life.
All ten akusala kamma are done with these 12 akusala citta. There are 8 greed-rooted, 2 hatred-
rooted, and 2 delusion-rooted citta. Of course citta (pronounced “chiththā”) are thoughts; any speech
or bodily action starts with a thought.
§ See, “Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna” for a list of 12 akusala citta.
2. Since vicikicchā is also due to wrong views, those five cittas marked in red are the strongest
akusala citta done with “wrong views” or ‘diṭṭhi“. Those five cittas stop arising in the mind of a
Sotāpanna.
They can condition one’s mind to a “gathi” suitable for birth in the apāyas; see, “What is in a
Thought? Why Gathi are so Important?“.
§ The vyāpāda or the strong hate — that makes one eligible for birth in the apāyas –actually
arises from the first four types of lobha citta. It is also called “dvesa” or “dvesha” which means
“second manifestation” or (“dvi +”vesa“) of lobha. When one is burdened with extreme greed,
it can turn to the second manifestation of extreme hate for anyone in the way.
§ Upon attaining the Sotāpanna stage, such habits or “gathi” are removed, and thus no adverse
kamma vipāka come to the mind at the dying moment, as we point out below. The “pati+ichcha
sama+uppada” or what is born is similar to what is grasped, is at play at the dying moment.
One automatically grasps things one has a habit of liking; they automatically come to the
forefront of the mind at the dying moment.
3. The other 7 akusala citta are stopped from arising in stages as a Sotāpanna cultivates the Path
further.
§ The two dislike (paṭigha)-rooted cittas (together with some potency of the remaining 4 greed-
based citta, i.e., kāma rāga) are reduced at the Sakadāgāmī stage.
§ Those two dislike-rooted citta are stopped from arising at the Anāgāmī stage. Also, potency of
the remaining 4 greed-based citta, i.e., kāma rāga are reduced to just kāma level.
§ Finally, the remaining 4 greed-based citta and the uddhacca citta are removed at the
Arahant stage. Thus an Arahant will never experience an akusala citta.
4. These 12 types of citta lead to 7 types of vipāka (resultant) citta.
§ None of the vipāka citta has any unwholesome roots (greed, hate, delusion); of course they also
do not have the wholesome roots. Thus they are called rootless (ahetuka) citta.
5. Five of these akusala vipāka citta are the ones that lead to (undesirable) sense events through the
five physical senses. Thus they are responsible for eye consciousness (cakkhu viññāṇa), ear
consciousness (sota viññāṇa), nose consciousness (ghāṇa viññāṇa), taste consciousness (jivhā
viññāṇa), and body consciousness (kāya viññāṇa).
§ Except for the body consciousness which is accompanied by pain, the other four are
accompanied by equanimity; see,”Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka Viññāṇa” and
“How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“
§ Thus any feelings of displeasure etc due to what is seen, heard, smelled, or tasted, are in the
thoughts that follow this “event” experienced through one of the physical senses. We will
discuss this in detail in the Abhidhamma section.
6. The sixth akusala vipāka citta is called receiving consciousness accompanied by equanimity
(upekkha-sahagata sampaticcana citta). This is a citta that accepts the sense impression to the mind
(we will discuss in Abhidhamma section).
7. The seventh akusala vipāka citta is called the investigating consciousness accompanied by
equanimity (upekkha-sahagata santirana citta). This is the citta that is responsible for the birth in the
apāyas (lowest four realms), i.e, it acts as the paṭisandhi citta for the birth in the apāyas.
8. One may wonder how a Sotāpanna avoids the apāyas, because he/she is still capable of generating
the 7 cittas that are not associated with diṭṭhi (see the Table above), and thus it is possible to generate
this apayagami-paṭisandhi citta.
§ The point is that after becoming a Sotāpanna, such vipāka thoughts do not come to the mind at
the last thought processes; only the good kamma vipāka come to the forefront of the mind close
to the dying moment because he/she no longer has the “gathi” suitable for a birth in the apāyas.
9. It is hard to give up one’s bad habits (“gathi“), mainly because one does not fully comprehend the
true nature of the world, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta, and thus has wrong views about this world with
31 realms. One needs to comprehend that one’s actions have consequences not only in this life, but
(mainly) in the future lives; also, whatever one gains by such harmful actions is just temporary, AND
do not leave one with a peace mind.
1. The 37 factors of Enlightenment (Bodhipakkhiya Dhamma) are the combined number of individual
factors in:
§ Four Factors of Mindfulness (Cattāro Satipaṭṭhāna),
§ Four Supreme Efforts (Cattāro Sammappadhāna),
§ Four Bases of Mental Power (Cattāro Iddhipāda),
§ Five Faculties (Pañca Indriya),
§ Five Powers (Pañca Bala),
§ Seven Factors of Enlightenment (Satta Bojjhaṅga), and
§ Factors of the Noble Eightfold Path (Ariya Attangika Magga).
2. These factors are really mental factors (cetasika). They are labelled with different names under
each category in the Table below to highlight its application.
§ For example, the paññā cetasika is labelled as vimansa in Four Bases of Mental Power, as
dhammavicaya in Satta Bojjhaṅga, and as Sammā Diṭṭhi in the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Under each category, I have listed the term used for that cetasika in that category. For example,
in the Noble Eightfold Path, Sammā Vāyāma is the viriya cetasika.
§ Thus even though there are 37 factors of Enlightenment, there are only 14 cetasika that will be
cultivated while cultivating all seven above categories.
§ It is clear that those 7 categories are all inter-related, and thus all 37 factors may be cultivated
by focusing only on Cattāro Satipaṭṭhāna, Satta Bojjhaṅga, or the Noble Eightfold Path.
3. It is also important to realize that cetasika are related to one’s character (gathi): “Cetasika –
Connection to Gathi”
4. The Four Supreme Efforts (Cattāro Sammappadhāna) are the efforts to purify the mind: (i)
remove defilement(akusala) that have arisen, (ii) prevent new defilement (akusala) from arising,
(iii) enhance wholesome states (kusala) that have arisen, (iv) initiate new wholesome states (kusala).
WebLink: suttacentral: AN 4.14 Saṃvarasutta (Restraint).
§ Not to let an unwholesome thought arise which has not yet arisen. ® restraint
§ Not to let an unwholesome thought continue which has already arisen. ® abandonment
§ To make a wholesome thought arise which has not yet arisen. ® development
§ To make a wholesome thought continue which has already arisen. ® protection (maintaining)
The following Table shows the conditions to be fulfilled (i.e., factors to be eliminated) to attain each
stage of Nibbāna. For example, in order to attain the Sotāpanna stage, three of the ten samyojana (or
the ten fetters) are removed, akusala citta #1, 2, 5, 6, and 11 are removed; also the apayagami
strength in the other cittas also removed, etc
Kilesa
Ariya Stage Samyojana Akusala Citta Anusaya Āsava (Asaya) (Akusala
Cetasika)
Removed :
diṭṭhi,
vicikicchā,
thina,
1,2,5,6,11
sakkāya diṭṭhi, Also middha, issa,
vicikicchā, removes diṭṭhi, maccariya,
Sotāpanna silabbata apāyagāmi vicikicchā diṭṭhāsava kukkucca
parāmāsa strength in the
rest Reduced:
lobha, dosa,
moha to rāga,
paṭigha,
avijjā
kāma rāga weakens 9, 10 kāma rāga :
Sakadāgāmī (reduced) also weakens (reduced) kāmāsava Reduced
kāma rāga
paṭigha kāma rāga in paṭigha (reduced) and paṭigha
(reduced) 3,4,7,8 (reduced)
9,10 :
Anāgāmī kāma rāga, also removes kāma rāga, kāmāsava
Removed
kāma rāga
paṭigha kāma rāga in paṭigha and paṭigha
3,4,7,8
rūpa rāga, Removed :
arūpa rāga, 3,4,7,8,12 bhava rāga, avijjā,
Arahant māna, (see below for a māna, bhavāsava, ahirika,
uddhacca, list of akusala avijjā avijjāsava anatoppa,
avijjā citta) uddhacca,
māna
The ability to commit akusala kamma also is removed in stages as one progresses, and are completely
removed only at the Arahant stage. It is important to note that a Sotāpanna completely removes only
one akusala kamma, that of having wrong views (micchā diṭṭhi): “What is the only Akusala Removed
by a Sotāpanna?“. But this leads to the removal of many kilesa (mental impurities); see the Table.
Āsava and anusaya are discussed in the post, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent Defilements), and
Āsava (Cravings)“. Kilesa are discussed in “Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct
Views)“. For a discussion on Dasa Samyojana, see, “Dasa Samyojana – Bonds in Rebirth Process”.
The 12 types of akusala citta are listed in, “Akusala Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“. But I thought it
would be more explanatory to list them. The numbers below correspond to the numbers in the Table.
Lobha (Greedy) Citta (Also has the moha root)
1. Citta connected with wrong view, accompanied by pleasure, and done with habit.
2. Citta connected with wrong view, accompanied by pleasure, and done reluctantly.
3. Citta NOT connected with wrong view, accompanied by pleasure, and done with habit.
4. Citta NOT connected with wrong view, accompanied by pleasure, and done reluctantly.
5. Citta connected with wrong view, accompanied by neutral mind, and done with habit.
6. Citta connected with wrong view, accompanied by neutral mind, and done reluctantly.
7. Citta NOT connected with wrong view, accompanied by neutral mind, and done with habit.
8. Citta NOT connected with wrong view, accompanied by neutral mind, and done reluctantly.
Dosa (Hateful) Citta (Also has the moha root)
9. Citta associated with hate, accompanied by displeasure, done with habit.
10. Citta associated with hate, accompanied by displeasure, done reluctantly.
Moha Citta (only with the moha root)
11. Citta accompanied by neutral mind, associated with vicikicchā (not aware of bad consequences)
12. Citta accompanied by neutral mind, associated with uddhacca (unfocused).
Notes:
1. Even though recent Abhidhamma literature categorize lobha and dosa citta as asankhārika
(unprompted) and sasankhārika (prompted), in original Abhidhamma, they were not categorized as
such.
2. For example, the two dosa-mūla cittas are:
i. Domanassa sahagata paṭigha-sampayutta citta.
ii. Domanassa sahagata sasankhārika paṭigha-sampayutta citta.
§ The first citta arises due to sansāric habits and thus are more potent. For example, someone
who has a tendency to flare-up, normally generates such potent citta.
§ On the other hand, another person without such a habit, may not generate such a citta unless
“forced hard”; it is done with reluctance, “when pushed to the limit”, or if the perceived “sense
pleasures” are enticing. Then he/she is actually “incorporating new “san” or initiating a new
habit; thus the name “sasankhārika“.
1. This Table lists the three kinds of ultimate realities (paramatta dhamma) in this world of 31
realms; they are conditioned, i.e., they arise due to causes and perish subsequently on their own;
nothing in this world is permanent. They do not arise if there are no causes, and when that happens
Nibbāna is the result.
§ Nibbāna is the unconditioned reality. It is attained when the six causes (lobha, dosa, moha,
alobha, adosa, amoha) are not there. Then the mind cannot get a “foothold” anywhere in the
material world.
§ Cultivating the three causes of alobha, adosa, amoha (together with removing lobha, dosa,
moha) is needed in following the Noble Eightfold Path, and when wisdom grows, all causes
will be rejected by the mind automatically at the end.
2. Ultimate realities can be compared to the fundamental particles in physics. Even though it was
believed in the early stages that atoms were the fundamental particles, now there are about 32 of such
particles; but now the “particle nature” is dissolving into “energy packets” in elementary particle
physics. In Buddha Dhamma, the 28 types of rūpa are very fine, and cannot be “seen” even with
abhiññā powers; they are “energy packets”.
3. The table also shows how “this world of 31 realms” can be described via the five aggregates, the
twelve sense bases, or 6 dhatus and how they incorporate the ultimate realities. There are other ways
too. They are all compatible and consistent with each other.
§ For example, 89 citta and 52 cetasika are included in the four “mental” aggregates, or in the
mind base and mind objects, or just in the viññāṇa dhatu.
§ Also note that the correct word is kandha and NOT skandha for the five “aggregates”. The Pāli
(and Sinhala) word kandha means a “pile” (as in a pile of sand) and is still used to denote a hill
in Sinhala. I just look up the meaning of “skandha” in Sanskrit and it says “Hindu god of war”.
This is how the true meanings of the original words have been lost due to incorporation of
“sophisticated sounding” Sanskrit words with no relevance.
Table: Analysis of the “world” and Nibbāna in terms of ultimate realities.
2. Vedanā, saññā are two cetasika; saṅkhāra has the rest of 50 cetasika; for a list of
cetasika, see Cetasika (Mental Factors)
3. For fine (sukuma) rūpa, see Rūpa (Material Form) – Table.
Cause of Birth in
Realm Description Lifetime
Realm
Anantariya papa
1. Niraya (Hell) Unimaginable kamma, Ten akusala Variable
suffering. kamma with established
wrong views.
12. Brahma Parisajja Jhānic bliss in this and First jhāna (minor) 1/3 MK (Note 3)
deva higher realms.
13. Brahma Purohitha First jhāna (medium) 1/2 MK
deva
Cause of Birth in
Realm Description Lifetime
Realm
1. The realms and the lifetimes are extracted from various suttas: see, for example,
“Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta – Introduction”, WebLink: suttacentral: Sāleyyaka Sutta (MN 41),
and “Paṭhama Mettā Sutta“.
§ Lifetimes of various deva realms are given in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Visākhā Sutta (AN
8.43)“.
2. Thihetuka means kusala kamma done with alobha, adosa, amoha.
§ Dvihetuka means kusala kamma done with alobha, adosa.
§ Ahetuka means kusala kamma done with only alobha, adosa, but also without enthusiasm.
§ See, “Patisandhi Citta – How the Next Life is Determined According to Gathi” for details.
creating the same kind of “bhava,” that leads to forming “gati” or habits. All these are
interconnected.
4. Now if we keep incurring such situations frequently, i.e., get in to fights with that person (or with
others) in similar manner, we will be building up that “bhava” and this could lead to the formation of
very potent kamma seeds; see, “Sankhara, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka.”
§ Furthermore, it becomes a “gati” as well (see, “Sansāric Habits and Asavas“). Then it is easier
to get into such situations, and a vicious cycle starts leading to that gati to take hold.
§ Here, it is critical to understand that “uppāda” or “birth” is according to the “bonding with
liking” (paṭi icca) for CAUSES, not the birth itself. For example, no one wants to be born a
dog. But a birth as a dog CANNOT be avoided if one willingly does “lowly things” appropriate
for dogs, and thus cultivates “dog gati.”
5. Now we combine the two terms: “paṭicca samuppāda” means “attachment to something leading
to the generation of corresponding “bhava” (and thus gati).
§ The establishment of a bhava, in turn, leads to a corresponding jāti or birth: “when one
gets attached, it sets up the likelihood of a new birth of similar characteristics.”
§ For example, when someone acts with greed out of habit, he/she is prone to act that way during
the lifetime. Furthermore, it could be manifested in a stronger way in a future birth by being
born as a Peta (hungry ghost).
6. Therefore, the establishment of an “existence” (bhava) could be two ways:
§ Even during the current lifetime, a similar situation can arise. For example, the “gati” formed
via above mentioned “fights” with other people, will tend to draw oneself to a similar outcome
even with the slightest provocation. That is a “pavutthi bhava” (and jāti) that lasts for a short
time during current life; see, “Idappaccayatā Paticca Samuppāda“.
§ If this hateful “gati” becomes profoundly ingrained and becomes a potent kamma seed, that
could come to the mind at the dying moment. That could lead to a hateful “uppatti bhava” in
the next existence, as an animal or even in the niraya (hell); see, “Akusala-Mūla Uppatti
Paticca Samuppāda.”
7. Here one should also be able to make a distinction between “bhava” (existence) and “jāti” (birth).
For example, an uppatti bhava may give rise to many births until the kammic energy in that kamma
seed is wears out; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ That is why, even though the human bhava is RARE, one may be reborn a human many times
at a stretch. Only those who were born in human in previous life (or a few lives) may be able to
remember those lives; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
§ Different types of paṭicca samuppāda cycles discussed at: “Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles“.
8. By perceiving illusory happiness, we get ourselves willingly attach to pleasurable things. We also
attached to stuff via hate, and the root cause for that is an attachment to something related.
§ For example, we get “attached” to a person with hate, if that person is blocking our access to
something that we like: We keep thinking about how bad he is, etc.
§ Thus attachment is possible with greed or hate. That is what “taṇhā” (in Sinhala, “තැනට
හාවීම” or “get fused or attached to” in English) means; see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via
Greed, Hate, and Ignorance.”
§ Therefore, it is essential to realize that “taṇhā” does not mean just greed. It could also be due to
hate or dislike.
9. Ultimately, both greed and hatred arise due to ignorance. Ignorance of not knowing the unfruitful
nature of “this world” of 31 realms, i.e, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta.”
§ There is unimaginable suffering in the lower four realms (see, “How the Buddha Described the
Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm”).
§ There is better happiness called nirāmisa sukha compared to sense pleasures: “Three Kinds of
Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?.”
10. There is no one, or no external force, keeping us bound to “this world” of 31 realms; see, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.” Just like an octopus grabbing its prey with all eight legs, we
willingly cling to things in “this world” of 31 realms filled with suffering.
§ Unless we see the true unfruitful and even dreadful (in the lower four realms) nature of
‘this world” by comprehending “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta,” we will not let go of it.
11. This is an excellent example of the confusion caused by translating Pāli to Sanskrit and then back
to English or Sinhala; see the explanation of Pratittyasamutpada (the Sanskrit word for Paṭicca
samuppāda) on Wikipedia:
WebLink: wiki: Pratītyasamutpāda
§ I think you will agree that it is confusing at best, with multiple possible meanings.
§ On the other hand, for someone knowledgeable in Pāli or Sinhala the meaning is very clear in
the name itself: pati + icca sama + uppāda.
12. Please read, “Habits and Goals,” “Sansāric Habits and āsavas,” and “The Way to Nibbāna –
Removal of āsavas,” before reading further postings as they appear below. One should also analyze
one’s own life experiences to see whether they are compatible with this explanation. That is part of
vipassanā (insight) mediation.
§ If one is genuinely interested in Buddha Dhamma, it is critical to understand Paṭicca
samuppāda.
§ How our thoughts arise AUTOMATICALLY due to gati is discussed in the post, “How Are
Gathi and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?.”
§ Even though the underlying concept seems to be simple, paṭicca samuppāda can run very deep.
In the “WebLink: suttacentral: Mahānidāna Sutta (DN 15),” the Buddha admonished Ven.
Ānanda not to take it lightly.
Next, “Paṭicca samuppāda – Overview,” ………….
1. Nothing can happen without a cause (“hetu” in Pāli or Sinhala). Everything happens for reasons, or
causes. Normally, many things simultaneously arise due to multiple causes.
§ However, one cause or one effect could dominate and thus sometimes it appears that one thing
happened due to one cause.
2. Due to our ignorance of the true nature of this world, we keep initiating new causes. If we do not
add fuel to a fire, the fire will extinguish when the fuel runs out.
§ We have been on this sansāric journey from the beginning-less time, because we have been
adding “fuel to the fire” without any pause.
3. The paṭicca samuppāda (let us shorten it as PS) describes all aspects of life moment-to-moment:
how we suffer the consequences of our past deeds, and how we make new causes or add more fuel.
§ Acariya Buddhaghosa understood only one aspect (the akusala-mūla PS) of the innumerable
applications of PS , and since the time Theravada sect adopted Visuddhimagga as the basis of
Dhamma, this wonderful knowledge of PS has been hidden.
§ Many variations of PS are discussed in the WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppādavibhaṅga
of the Vibhangappakarana in the Abhidhamma Pitaka.
4. Here are the main subsections in this section:
§ Several PS cycles are discussed in this section: “Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles“. However, please
read #7 below, before going there.
§ For those who really want to avoid too many Pāli words: “Paṭicca Samuppāda in Plain
English“.
§ What is meant by “paccayā” (conditions), and discussions on different types of conditions:
“Pattana Dhamma“. An introduction to “paccayā” is given in #5 below.
§ “Imasmim Sati Idam Hoti – What Does It Really Mean?“
5. Even if there is a cause, its result (effect) does not manifest until right conditions (“paccayā” in
Pāli) appear.
§ This is discussed in detail in, “What Does “Paccayā” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?“. We can
get the basic idea form a few examples here.
§ A matchstick has the potential to bring about fire. But unless it is heated by striking on a hard
surface, fire does not appear.
§ A bomb can explode and create much destruction. But it will not go off until triggered.
§ We all have bad habits, but they do not manifest until it is triggered by an object (a picture,
sound, smell, touch, or a thought).
6. Therefore, if one acts mindfully, one can PREVENT many akusala vipāka and FORCE many
kusala vipāka. We all have innumerable number of both accumulated in this sansara; see, “The Law
of Attraction, Habits (Gathi), and Cravings (Asavas)“, and “The Law of Attraction, Habits (Gathi),
and Cravings (Asavas)“.
§ Details at: “Pattana Dhamma“.
7. It is necessary to understand that the terms in the standard PS cycle: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra;
saṅkhāra paccayā viññāna; viññāna paccayā nāmarūpa, nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana, saḷāyatana
paccayā phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā, vedanā paccayā taṇhā, taṇhā paccayā upādāna, upādāna
paccayā bhavo, bhava paccayā jāti, jāti paccayā jarā, marana, soka-parideva-dukkha-
domanassupāyasā sambhavan’ti” are highly condensed.
8. Most modern texts in English just translate those key words to single words in English, which
leads to misinterpretations in many cases.
§ It is better to understand the meaning of each of those Pāli worlds and just use those
words. Their meanings can have different meanings based on the context.
9. In the following I will provide a selected few posts to read in order to get an idea of what is meant
by those Pāli words. The following terms are associated with the akusala-mūla PS.
Avijjā: “What is Avijjā (Ignorance)?“.
Saṅkhāra: In most cases, what comes to play is abhisaṅkhāra or “strong saṅkhāra“. But it is
necessary to get the basic idea of “saṅkhāra” first: “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
Viññāna: One of the complex Pāli words: “Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
Nāmarūpa: Another complex word: “Viññāṇa paccayā Nāmarūpa“.
Saḷāyatana: Saḷāyatana (six āyatana) are not six sense faculties, “Nāmarūpa paccayā Saḷāyatana“.
Phassa: What really comes into play in PS is not “phassa“, but “defiled contact” or samphassa,
“Difference between Phassa and Samphassa“.
Vedanā: Vedanā in PS does not really mean “feelings”, but “samphassa jā vedana“: “Vedanā
(Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
Tanhā: “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
Upādāna: “Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna“.
Bhava and Jāti: “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein” and “Gati to Bhava to Jāti
– Ours to Control“.
§ Of course, gati is another key Pāli word that is not discussed much these days. More posts on
each word can be found by using the “Search” box at top right.
10. It is clear from #7 above that all future suffering (jarā, marana, soka-parideva-dukkha-
domanassupāyasā sambhavan’ti) will be stopped when the akusala-mūla PS is stopped from arising.
§ It is also clear that all future suffering ends when there is no rebirth, i.e., when the step
“bhava paccayā jāti” stops and thus “jāti paccayā jarā, marana, soka-parideva-dukkha-
domanassupāyasā” step stops.
§ As long as there jāti (or births), the suffering will not end.
11. The akusala-mūla PS can be terminated by working on two main targets: avijjā and taṇhā.
§ It is quite clear why we need to remove avijjā. If there is no avijjā (i.e., if one comprehends the
Four Noble Truths), then an akusala-mūla PS will not even get started.
§ The second one of removing taṇhā is not that clear. It is actually gradually reduced by changing
our gati. This is discussed in the post: “Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna“.
November 6, 2015; Major revision October 13, 2017; #12 added November 3, 2017
Paṭicca samuppāda (PS) cycles have many varieties and can be analyzed in great detail and can
reveal subtle aspects as well as clarify our understanding about the world we live in.
1. There are two broad categories of PS cycles.
i. The standard paṭicca samuppāda describes how our actions (saṅkhāra) lead to the generation
of new kammā. Thus they could be called “kammā generating” PS cycles.
ii. The other category of PS cycles is responsible for bringing in kammā vipāka, and thus could be
called “vipāka generating” PS; this type of a PS cycle is labelled in the Tipiṭaka as an avyākata
PS; avyākata means “kammicaly neutral”; not generating new kammā. The Pāli word is
avyākata and the Sinhala word is avyākruta. But in many places it is written as abyākata.
2. Everything that we INITIALLY EXPERIENCE is due to a kammā vipāka and is brought in by an
avyākata PS. That PS process just make us see, hear, smell, taste, experience bodily sensations, and
bring in new thoughts to the mind.
§ However, the feelings (vedanā) that we experience due to such sense inputs are not the same
for different persons, except in the case of bodily sensations. Everyone feels the same if getting
hit (pain), or getting a good massage (pleasure).
§ In other five sense inputs, the vedanā generated depends on the person. For example, a teenager
may like a heavy metal song, but his grandfather may not.
§ In all cases, each person RESPONDS to the sense input in one’s own way. It is this response
that may lead to new kammā and is described by the “kammā generating” PS cycles.
3. We do not have control over the avyākata PS — which bring kammā vipāka by initiating new
sense events; once started, they cannot be stopped. Even Arahants cannot avoid kammā vipāka.
§ But the “kammā generating” PS cycles that arise as our response to such sense events can be
controlled by us based on our gati (saṃsāric habits). This is the basis of Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna
meditations.
§ Avyākata PS bring kammā vipāka when suitable conditions are available; see, “Anantara
Samanantara Paccaya“.
4. Now, depending on what we see, hear, etc due to a kammā vipāka, we MAY start making saṅkhāra
and a new “kammā generating” PS cycle may be initiated; then we make more kammā vipāka.
§ For example, when we see an appealing object, we may generate lobha (greedy) thoughts
(apuññābhi saṅkhāra); when we see a distasteful object we may generate hateful thoughts
(apuññābhi saṅkhāra). If we see a beggar on the street, we may generate alobha thoughts
(puññābhi saṅkhāra) which may lead to a meritorious act (giving some money to that person).
§ All those “seeing events” arose due to avyākata PS cycles. But those different responses,
generating saṅkhāra, were done by “kammā generating” PS cycles, that operate based on one’s
gati (saṃsāric habits), as will discuss below.
5. ALL our actions are initiated by avyākata PS cycles; but not all avyākata PS cycles lead to
“kammā generating” PS cycles generating new kammā. You may want to think about this and see
that indeed that is true.
§ Thousands of people see an item on display in a shop. Many just glance at it and don’t give it
another thought. Some will stop and take another look since they like it. There could also be
someone who really wanted it, but may not have money, and even think about stealing it!
§ There is no “fixed person with avijjā“. Avijjā can arise in any normal human (without magga
phala), if the sense input is strong enough! You may also want to read the post on “‘Self’ and
‘no-self’: A Simple Analysis – Do We Always Act with avijjā?“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Paṭicca Samuppāda 889
§ Whether avijjā arises depends on the particular sense input and the person (more correctly
person’s gathi).
6. We normally call a person “moral” when he/she acts morally in most cases.
However, that does not mean that a “moral person” will not generate immoral thoughts at times. If a
“tempting sense input comes in” via any of the six senses, he/she may act with avijjā and start an
akusala-mūla PS.
§ Similarly, one labelled as a criminal (because of his prior acts) may see someone in danger and
act with kindness initiating a meritorious deed.
§ This is why the Buddha said that there is no “unchanging self”, but there is no “self” either.
What happens at a given moment depends on what kind of PS cycle is “triggered”, and the level
of avijjā triggered. avijjā can range from moha (morally blind) to just not knowing the anicca
nature.
§ A person considered to be “moral” may act with moha and commit a severely immoral act, if
the trigger was tempting enough.
7. ALL our sense inputs come to us via kammā vipāka. Through the beginning-less saṃsāra, we have
accumulated “infinite amounts” of kammā vipāka, large and small, and each “seeing event”, “hearing
event”, etc is due to a kammā vipāka.
§ We do not even notice most of these sense events. When we travel in a car, we see a million of
things, but only a few “catch our attention”. Only those few events lead to the initiation of
“kammā generating” PS cycles.
§ But even one initiation of a “kammā generating” PS cycle can, in turn, initiate many “follow-
up” PS cycles. For example, while walking we may see a house by the road that we really like
(which is due to a kammā vipāka). We may get attached to it (form taṇhā), and then start
thinking about building a house like that. Then we may remember a nice house that belongs a
friend, and then start thinking about that friend, which could lead to thinking about a common
enemy. All of a sudden now we have started a stronger “kammā generating” PS cycle that could
lead to a worse kammā vipāka.
§ This is the “wheeling process” that we discussed in the post, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to
Understand?” and many other posts; enter the keywords “wheeling process” in the Search box
at top right and you will get many posts. Our sansāric journey is fueled by an uncountable
“kammā generating” PS cycles.
8. This vicious cycle of “vipāka” leading to “kammā” leading to more “vipāka” is the process that
binds us to the sansara of endless rebirths, or perpetuate our “world” of suffering.
§ The Buddha describes this as, “kammā vipākā vaddanti, vipāko kamma sambhavo, tasmā
punabbhavo hoti, evan loko pavattati“.
§ That means, “kammā lead to vipāka, vipāka in turn lead to kammā and thus to rebirth
(punabbhavo), and that is how the world (existence) is maintained”.
§ There “sambhava” is “san” + “bhava“, or “adding more existences”. Also, “loka” is world, and
“pavatta” means “maintain”.
9. The key point is that unless one has at least attained the Sotāpanna stage, one COULD act with
avijjā at the level of moha, and generate kammā (saṅkhāra) that COULD generate kammā bhava
corresponding to possible birth in the four lowest realms (apāyas).
§ In other words, depending on the trigger it is possible for the pancanīvarana to “cover the
mind” and initiate strong akusala-mūla PS cycles for any human being not yet attained the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ For example, we have heard stories about people with “good moral backgrounds” committing
rape, under conditions that led to kāmaccandha nīvarana taking over their minds.
Kāmaccandha comes from “kāma + icca + anda“, where icca is liking and anda is blind; thus
kāmaccanda means “blinded by liking for kāma or sense pleasures”.
§ We have also heard stories about murders that were committed by “moral people” who were
enraged by the sight of their spouse in bed with another person. Here the second nīvarana,
vyāpada, covered their minds.
§ Those two are the strongest nīvarana, but we can think about cases when the other three also
could lead to immoral acts: thina middha (frozen or lazy mind), uddhacca kukkucca (tendency
to do lowly things with high-mindedness), and vicikicchā (tendency to do unwise things due to
not knowing the anicca nature).
10. When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, some of these pancanīvarana are permanently removed
(some components are reduced below the nīvarana state).
§ That is why potent akusala-mūla PS cycles — which could lead to rebirths in the apāyas —
are not triggered for a Sotāpanna; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
§ One’s gati permanently change with magga phala. More changes happen at higher magga
phala.
11. Different types of PS cycles are discussed at: “Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles“.
§ The “vipāka generating” avyākata PS is discussed in the post, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda
for Vipāka Viññāṇa”.
§ The “kammā generating” PS processes can be divided into two broad categories again: those
generating “bad kammā” and “good kammā“: “Akusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda” and
“Kusala-mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda”.
§ Those “kammā generating” PS processes where one can see the consequences during this life
itself are discussed in “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ There can be many other types too. But one can get a good idea of how PS works in different
situations can be grasped by understanding those key processes.
12. Finally, There is another important way that we get started with generating new kamma. This is
when we “get random thoughts coming to our minds that get us started on a pleasurable action”.
§ For example, we may be doing something and all of a sudden we get a thought about watching
a movie or even start thinking about an enemy and what can be done to him/her. These are
initiated by “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“, where dhammā coming
to our minds; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ These are also kamma vipāka. But these are more common than just seeing an enemy by chance
or hearing something that one likes, etc.
§ In either case, we need to be mindful always, and catch such “new kamma generations”. This is
the key to Ānāpāna/Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā.
1. First, a word about the nomenclature: The Pāli word is avyākata (or abyākata) and the Sinhala
word is avyākruta. It means “not designated as kusala or akusala, i.e., kammicaly neutral“: there are
no javana citta involved that generate abhisaṅkhāra.
§ Kamma vipāka are kammically neutral. But based on those kamma vipāka, we initiate new
kamma; see, “How Are Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles Initiated?“. I recommend reading that first,
before continuing on this post.
§ Both categories — kamma vipāka and kamma generation — can be described by paṭicca
samuppāda (PS).
§ Another key point I want to point out is that avyākata PS cycles NEVER start with a
pabhassara citta [Radiant Mind]; see below.
2. Past kamma vipāka bring sense inputs via the six senses and IF we get attached — taṇhā — to
those sense inputs, THEN that leads to new kamma by us. That is why it is a never ending process,
until one attains Nibbāna. After the Arahanthood, one will still experience such kamma vipāka, but
WILL NOT get attached to them, i.e., no new kamma will be generated.
This cyclic process can be described in three steps:
i. One sees, hears, smells, tastes, makes body contacts, or a “dhamma” comes to one’s mind.
These do not “just happen”; they happen due to reasons (causes). They come about due to
kamma vipāka, and those thoughts that arise due to them are called vipāka citta OR avyākata
citta, since they are kammically neutral.
ii. Then, based on one’s gati (pronounced “gathi”), āsava, anusaya, one’s mind may automatically
get interested in a sense input (called an ārammana), and may get attached to that sense input.
This happens within a billionth of a second and we DO NOT have control over that initial
response either; mano saṅkhāra are generated AUTOMATICALLY in one’s mind. These are
also part of the avyākata citta since they arise AUTOMATICALLY within the same citta
vīthi.
iii. IF we one gets attached, then one starts generating new kamma by thinking
CONSCIOUSLY about that sense input (generating vacī saṅkhāra), i.e., one starts “wheeling
around” accumulating “san” that contribute to new kamma; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma
Beeja, Kamma Vipāka“. That new kamma can get stronger if we may also start doing kāya
saṅkhāra via speech and bodily actions.
3. All those three steps may start even before our minds register that we have started
accumulating new kamma. This is because citta vīthi are very fast, and all those happen within a
single citta vīthi; see below. But if we are mindful, we can “catch” such “wheeling around” within a
few seconds and stop just the apuññābhi saṅkhāra (we should not stop puññābhi saṅkhāra or moral
thoughts).
§ But that requires careful monitoring of our “automatic responses” to such sense inputs; this is
what is called “being mindful”. With practice, one can “catch” them quickly and stop bad
thoughts/speech/actions.
§ If we keep doing that, then OVER TIME, our gati will change for the better, and our
attachments to “bad things” will fade away; see, “Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna“.
What is described in that post is the basis of Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna bhavana. If one can grasp
this concept, and implement it diligently over a few months, one will be able to see for oneself
the benefits!
§ Also see, “Gati, Bhava, and Jāti” to read about very important concept of gati. It is not correct
to say we have a “self” or “no-self”; we just have gati that can be changed.
§ That is the basis of Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna bhāvanā. If one can grasp this concept, and
implement it diligently over a few months, one will be able to see for oneself the benefits!
§ One can try it with “bad habits” (smoking, drugs, over-eating, etc) first to see the power of it,
and then extend to other dasa akusala. This is also the way to Sotāpanna stage, because then
one will be able to grasp Tilakkhaṇa too.
4. It is very important to understand the above steps, and the post “Tanhā – How We Attach Via
Greed, Hate, and Ignorance” is a necessary first read too. What happens is explained in a bit more
detail in “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“, “Käma Äsvada Start with Phassa paccayā vedanā
or Samphassa Ja vedanā“, and has been discussed in a more fundamental way in the subsection:
Living Dhamma – Fundamentals“.
§ Grasping this cyclic process of how we have traversed this suffering-filled rebirth process can
be quite helpful but one must be willing to spend some time on those posts.
5. All PS processes can be broadly divided into three categories:
i. What we will discuss in this post is how past kamma vipāka bring in sense inputs via avyākata
(Sinhala: avyākruta) PS process, and also automatically generate mano saṅkhāra.
ii. Then akusala-mūla PS processes may contribute to generating new kamma that extend the
rebirth process. These also start within seconds, but as mentioned above, we can catch and stop
them if we are mindful (Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna).
iii. The kusala-mūla PS process describes how one can accumulate new “good kamma” that will
eventually help us attain Nibbāna by following the Noble Path. If the kamma vipāka generated
such a “good PS” process, we should cultivate those. That is also part of
Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna.
The akusala-mūla and kusala-mūla PS processes are discussed in: “Paṭicca Samuppāda Cycles“. So,
this post on abyākata (Sinhala: avyakruta) PS process will complete that subsection. ( re-arrange
this section)
6. Now we can make the connection between the categories in #2 to categories in #5.
§ The sense inputs initiation #2 (i), and the initial response to it #2(ii), are generated by the
avyākata (avyakruta) PS process of #5(i).
§ Our CONSCIOUS response to those sense inputs in creating new kamma (apuññābhisaṅkhāra
or puññābhisaṅkhāra) in #2(iii), are carried out by the two kinds of PS processes in #5(ii) and
#5(iii).
7. This avyākata PS process is not discussed in current Theravāda texts including Visuddhimagga. It
is of course in the Tipiṭaka, and only the Pāli version is available at: “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭicca
Samuppāda Vibhaṅga” (Section 2.11 on Abyākata Niddesa is about three quarters of the way down
from the top).
§ I have not seen any current texts or internet sites in English that describe the avyākata PS
process. But is needed to complete the picture of how kamma vipāka bring in sense inputs to us
AND initiate new kamma.
8. Here is the initiation of the avyākata PS process per Tipiṭaka reference in #7 above: “..vipākaṃ
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ uppannaṃ hoti upekkhā sahagataṃ rūpārammaṇaṃ, tasmiṃ samaye saṅkhāra
this vipāka cycle, no kamma is done by the mind; the mind just matches the “picture” that it
received against one’s gati, and automatically recognizes if it is an object that one
likes/dislikes.
§ For example, if an alcoholic see a bottle of his favorite alcohol, he will be temporarily be
“born” (jāti) as an alcoholic at that instant. But if it was a person who has no such gati, this
process will end right there (just seeing).
§ But if it did lead to the person being born in the “alcoholic state”, then a new akusala-mūla PS
process will run inside that avyākata PS process starting at “bhava paccayā jāti” step.
13. Therefore, subsequent to that avyākata PS, new akusala-mūla PS processes may start. That is the
“new kamma generation”. Even though an Arahant will experience a similar avyākata PS, that WILL
NOT lead to an akusala-mūla PS process.
§ An akusala-mūla PS process MAY NOT be initiated even in a normal human, if he/she did not
have gati to be attached to that sense input (ārammana).
§ But that does NOT mean that the avyākata PS in that case involved “pabhassara
citta” [Radiant Mind] or “pure uncontaminated citta“. It just means that person did not have
gati to be interested in that particular sense input.
14. Both the initial avyākata PS and the subsequent akusala-mūla PS process will take place within
the same citta vīthi (in the above example a cakkhudvāra citta vīthi with 17 citta), which lasts only a
billionth of a second!
§ Such fast processes are not discernible to any human other than a Buddha. But we have the
ability to study it and realize that indeed that must be correct. In that we must not focus on just
this process, but realize that it fits in nicely with any phenomenon that we experience.
§ As one learns deeper concepts, it will be difficult not be amazed by the capabilities of a
Buddha. This is how one builds one’s faith (saddhā).
§ The following discussion will illustrate how the processes that we discussed above fit in nicely
with the concept of a citta vīthi.
15. The following may not be fully graspable by someone who is not familiar with the details of citta
vīthi. But just read on and try to get the basic idea without worrying about the details.
§ The following figure shows a typical thought process (citta vīthi) that is started when eyes
capture a “seeing event” (rūpa aramanna or rūpārammana).
Click the following link to magnify and download: WebLink: PDF File: avyākata PS
§ For a discussion on citta vīthi, see, “Citta vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
16. In between citta vīthi, the mind is in the “bhavaṅga state”; see, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind,
and Bhavaṅga“. That post is also a bit advanced, and I will try to make a new section on “simple
Abhidhamma” in the future.
§ If you see someone not active and just staring into space (not really thinking or concentrating
on an idea), then that person’s mind is likely to be in the bhavaṅga state (B in the figure). This
is also explained in the post, “Citta vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
§ When the mind switches from this bhavaṅga state to a picture that is brought to its attention, it
takes three thought moments to “break away” from that bhavaṅga state, and to focus the
attention to the new sense input.
§ With the PD citta, the mind sees that it is coming through the “eye door” (cakkhu dvāra) and in
the next citta captures that picture. This is the initiation of the avyākata PS process: “..vipākaṃ
cakkhuviññāṇaṃ uppannaṃ hoti” in #8 above.
17. Then, during the next two citta (“Sam” for sampaticcana, and “San” for santirana), the mind
matches that picture (sense input) with its own gati and may get attached to it. This is what is
described in “tasmiṃ samaye saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇaṃ, viññāṇa paccayā nāmaṃ, nāma
paccayā chaṭṭhāyatanaṃ, chaṭṭhāyatana paccayā phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā, vedanā paccayā
bhavo, bhava paccayā jāti”.
§ Then the person is “temporarily born” in a different state (a person with “alcoholic gati” will be
born instantly as an alcoholic upon seeing his/her favorite drink), and may start a new akusala-
mūla PS process, as discussed below.
§ That decision to acting with avijjā based on that “matching” happens at the all important
vottapana (V) citta.
18. Then a new akusala-mūla (or kusala-mūla) PS process starts and one starts generating kamma
with javana citta (J), as shown in the above figure. So, this new PS process starts with the standard,
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra, saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa…”.
§ When this initial citta vīthi ends, more such akusala-mūla PS cycles will follow, if one got
“attached”. Even within a second, there could be thousands of such akusala-mūla PS cycles
running (and each becoming stronger due to the past ones), even before one is fully consciously
aware of it.
§ But as humans (with the neo cortex that slow down this fast processing; see, “Truine Brain:
How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits“, we have the ability to stop those
akusala-mūla PS cycles from building up to doing bad speech and bad actions.
§ This is the key to Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna bhāvanā: to be mindful and catch any “impulsive
wrong actions” before they get out of hand. With practice, one will be able to “catch oneself”
very early in this process.
19. This is also why Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna bhāvanā cannot just be limited to a “sitting meditation
session”. One needs to be engaged during all waking hours and be mindful. Then with time, our gati
will change for the better, and we will stop doing “foolish and damaging things”.
§ Then our minds will become pure and we will be able to grasp more of Buddha Dhamma. It is a
gradual process, especially initially.
§ Now it should also be clear that one will NOT have a “pabhassara citta” [Radiant Mind] at any
time unless one is an Arahant. It should be clear that one can never stop that initial avyākata
citta vīthi. It is gone within a billionth of a second.
§ However, we do need to stop those akusala-mūla PS processes, as soon as we become aware of
them. Terminology does not matter, if one is doing the correct procedure.
20. Don’t be discouraged if you find this post too technical. Paṭicca samuppāda can go to very deep
levels. Just get the overall idea and things will become clear with time, if you read the other posts
referenced.
Akusala-mūla version is the only version of paṭicca samuppāda (PS) described in even the current
Theravāda texts, even though the other versions are in the Tipiṭaka.
1. One is born in this world due to the six root causes.
§ One is born in the apāyās or dugati (and also subjected to suffering even when born in good
realms) due to bad gati arising mainly due to lobha, dosa, moha. The akusala-mūla PS operates
when actions, speech, and thoughts take place with these three root causes.
§ One is born in the remaining “good realms” or sugati (and also experience mundane sense
pleasures) due to good gati due to alobha, adosa, amoha. The kusala-mūla PS operates when
actions, speech, and thoughts take place with these three root causes; see, “Kusala-Mula Paṭicca
Samuppada“.
2. Akusala-mūla PS describes the PS process when one acts with lobha, dosa, moha, the three root
causes that bring “bad outcomes”. It is also two fold:
§ The uppatti PS describes how a “lifestream” or a being makes the sansāric journey via
repeated births in the 31 realms.
§ The pavutti (or pravurti) PS describes moment-to-moment progression of a “lifestream” or a
being. This is discussed at, “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
3. Let us first discuss the uppatti PS, which describes how the PS cycle goes through a new birth at
the end of current life. The steps in this cycle are:
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra; saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa; viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa, nāmarūpa
paccayā saḷāyatana, saḷāyatana paccayā phasso, phassa paccayā vedanā, vedanā paccayā taṇhā,
taṇhā paccayā upādāna, upādāna paccayā bhavo, bhava paccayā jāti, jāti paccayā jarā, marana,
soka-parideva-dukkha-domanassupāyasā sambhavan’ti” [Weblink: suttacentral: Majjhima Nikāya
115 Bahudhātukasutta]
And that is how this whole mass of suffering arises: “Evametassa kevalassa dukkhakkhandhassa
samudayo hoti “
Let us briefly translate them:
4. With ignorance as condition, one accumulates saṅkhāra. It must be noted that these are really
abhisaṅkhāra, i.e., they are strong saṅkhāra; abhi means “strong”.
§ When we are born, we are born without ANYTHING material other than our tiny baby body,
which actually started as a single cell in the mother’s womb. We grow up and start acquiring
“stuff” both material and non-material: knowledge, material things, friends, spouse, children,
fame, etc.
§ While we acquire these “things” we also acquire new habits (gati) or strengthen ones that we
brought from previous lives; these take place according to the pavutti PS at every moment:
“pati+ichcha sama uppada“, i.e., we do things that we like and get similar kind of results.
§ When we die, we take with us only the kamma seeds (both good and bad) from our actions; the
habits (gati) and cravings (āsavas) are embedded in them. These are in the manomaya kāya,
and the manomaya kāya leaves the dead physical body with those “updated” kamma
seeds; see the next post. This is basically the “net result” of our life here.
§ One of existing kamma seeds (from this life or from previous lives) gives rise to the next life,
where we acquire more of them BASED ON the gati and āsavas. So the cycle perpetuates.
5. With saṅkhāra as condition, energy for a new bhava or a paṭisandhi viññāṇa arises.
§ This viññāṇa of the new life arises according to the nature of the kamma seed that gave rise to
it. If that kamma seed was acquired by doing some hateful act(s), then the viññāṇa will be
matching: “pati+ichcha sama uppāda“. If it is a seed due to an act of a generosity done with
loving kindness, it could be the viññāṇa of a Brahma.
§ Thus the “base level of viññāṇa” for an animal life is VERY DIFFERENT from that of a
human life, even for the same “lifestream”, i.e., when a human is reborn as an animal the “base
level of viññāṇa” makes a huge downward transition. This is why it is NOT correct to say that
“viññāṇa is transferred from life to life”.
6. With viññāṇa as condition, nāmarūpa arise.
§ Again, the nature of the “nāmarūpa” of the new life is according to “pati+ichcha sama
uppāda“. In the above mentioned cases, the new life form may be that of an animal of a being
in the niraya (hell) or that of a Brahma with a fine body.
7. With nāmarūpa as condition, saḷāyatana arise.
§ The saḷāyatana (six sense doors) arise accordingly too: In the above mentioned cases, all six
sense doors suitable for the kind of animal form or just three sense doors (eye,ear, and mind)
suitable for a Brahma.
8. With saḷāyatana as condition, phasso arise.
§ Here phassa is really “samphassa” or “san phassa“; see step #2 in “Taṇhā -How We Attach via
Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
§ This is why this “Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda” is not applicable for an Arahant (and also
for other Ariyas too at most times). An Arahant does not generate “samphassa” but just
“phassa” without “san“.
9. With (san) phassa as condition, vedanā arise.
§ Such interactions with the external world lead to feelings (vedanā) of different kinds. Here, it
is important to realize that NOT all vedanā play a role here. Those vedanā that arise due
to kamma vipāka arise just due to phassa; only those vedanā that arise due to samphassa
(“samphassa ja vedanā“) play a role here.
§Such “samphassa ja vedanā” depend on the gathi and āsavas: see, “Vedanā (Feelings) Arise in
Two Ways“. Also, see step #3 in, “Taṇhā -How We Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
§ We can get rid of this part of vedanā (suffering) in this very life by getting rid of “bad habits”,
by becoming a “sampajanno“; see, “Kayanupassana – The Section on Habits
(Sampajanapabba)“.
10. With vedanā as condition, taṇhā arise.
§ Taṇhā arise, when one gets “attached” or ‘fused” into a thing or situation: with sukha vedanā,
one attaches with greed; with displeasure, one attaches with hate; one also attaches with not
knowing what to do (with a highly agitated mind); see, “Taṇhā -How We Attach via Greed,
Hate, and Ignorance“.
11. With taṇhā as condition, upādāna arise.
§ At the moment of death, in the last citta vīthi, the dying person gets a kamma nimitta. This is
normally a vision or a sound that depicts the nature of the strong kamma seed that came to the
forefront of the mind. For example, if the kamma seed that is about to give the next birth was
due to a killing, then the person may see a gun or hear the sound of it, or even see himself as
getting ready to shoot; thus the person will have the same hateful thoughts arise and just like at
the time the crime was committed, the person embraces that situation automatically (upādāna),
because one has such “gathi” or habits.
12. With upādāna as condition, bhavo arise.
§ The next citta vīthi starts with the new existence or “bhava” matching that state of mind:
“pati+ichcha sama uppāda“. Depending on the kamma nimitta that was grasped, a matching
existence, a human, animal, deva, etc. arise; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
13. With bhava as condition, jāti (new birth) arise.
§ Then a birth matching the bhava starts. If the bhava is human realm, then a human birth will
result. Now, here is the difference between bhava and jāti: The duration of the selected “human
bhava” will last until the kammic energy associated with that kamma seed is exhausted. Thus if
the kamma seed has potential for thousand years of life, when the current life ends the next
birth will be still in the human realm. This is UNLESS one commits a anantariya kamma or
even a very strong other type of kamma. For example, if one attains Anāgāmī or Arahant stages,
the person will not be reborn in the human realm; or if one kills a parent, for example; all these
are anantariya kamma.
14. With jāti as condition, “jara, maranan, soka-parideva-dukkha-domanassupayasa sambhavan’ti”
arise.
§ Jāti inevitably results in decay and eventual death, and this is how dukkha originates.
§ No matter where one is born in the 31 realms, one ages and eventually dies; in between one
goes through all kinds of suffering, in particular at human realm and below. Aging and death
are certainties. And at death the whole cycle re-starts.
15. The above steps describe the uppatti PS. The other aspect, i.e., what happens during a given
lifetime, is described in, “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
All the steps in the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda are described in detail in the series: “Paṭicca
Samuppāda in Plain English“.
Next, “Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“, ………..
8.4.3 Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda
1. Kusala-mūla version of paṭicca samuppāda (PS) is not described in even the current Theravāda
texts, even though it is in the Tipiṭaka. This is because since the time Buddhghosa wrote
Visuddhimagga, all Theravāda texts followed that and his other books instead of Tipiṭaka.
§ That means the PS process for attaining Nibbāna has NOT been described for over 1500 years.
No wonder the Nibbāna has been hidden for all these years.
§ Kusala-mūla (pronounced kusala– mūla) PS describes the PS process for acting with alobha,
adosa, and amoha (which is the same as saying staying away from dasa akusala or acting
without lobha, dosa, and moha.
2. One is born in this world due to the six root causes.
§ One is born in the apayas or dugati (and also subjected to suffering even when born in good
realms) due to bad gati arising mainly due to lobha, dosa, moha. The akusala-mula PS operates
when actions, speech, and thoughts take place with these three root causes; see, “Akusala-Mūla
Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ One is born in the “good realms” or sugati (and also experience mundane sense pleasures) due
to “good gati” developed by acting with alobha, adosa, amoha. Kusala-mula PS cycles operate
when actions, speech, and thoughts take place with these three root causes that bring “good
outcomes”.
§ Kusala-mūla PS describes the PS process when one acts with alobha, adosa, amoha, the three
root causes that bring “good outcomes”.
acquired in the distant past do not get a chance to come to forefront, and thus a rebirth in the
lower four realms is prevented.
13. With bhava as condition, jāti arise.
§ The appropriate jāti (Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī) will result in an appropriate realm.
14. With jāti as condition, jara, maranan, eva me tassa dhammanan samudhayo hoti“.
§ Any Ariya is also subject to decay and death as long as he/she is in one of the 31 realms. But
here the connection to dukkha is not shown, because one is destined to attain Nibbāna.
Next, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“, ………
8.4.4 Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda
Re-written with a new title May 18, 2019; revised May 20, 2019
Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda is another important teaching that has been hidden for hundreds
of years. The word “Idappaccayatā” comes from “ida” for “here” and the closest English word for
“paccaya” is “condition”. Thus Idappaccayatā implies “based on this condition at this moment”.
Therefore, Idappaccayatā Paticca Samuppāda describes how “pati icca” leads to “sama uppāda”
moment by moment based on the conditions present at that moment; see, “Paticca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda””.
§ The additional “p” in “idappacayatā” comes from the combination of “ida” and “paccaya”.
This is similar to “dammacakka” and “pavattana” combined to yield
“dhammacakkappavattana” in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta.
§ Another important point is that “‘A first point of ignorance, bhikkhus, is not seen such that
before this there was no ignorance and afterward it came into being. Ignorance arises at any
time when the conditions are right” or “Purimā, bhikkhave, koṭi na paññāyati avijjāya: ‘ito
pubbe avijjā nāhosi, atha pacchā samabhavī’ti. Evañcetaṃ, bhikkhave, vuccati, atha ca pana
paññāyati: ‘idappaccayā avijjā’ti.”; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Avijjā Sutta (AN 10.61)“.
1. As mentioned in earlier posts (see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda“), paṭicca samuppāda (PS) or “cause and
effect” can describe various stages of life in multiple ways: from a very fast 16 PS cycles operating
inside a thought moment to a long-term PS process that describes how a “living being” is born in one
of an uncountable number of species in the 31 realms in the rebirth process.
§ The Buddha said that the PS is deep as a deep ocean and it can be applied to any situation,
because everything “in this world” obeys the basic principle of cause and effect. It is no wonder
that only one PS has been studied for over thousand years while the true Dhamma remained
hidden.
§ In the previous post we discussed the uppatti PS which describes that latter process, i.e., how
the PS cycle operates between lives; see, “Akusala-Mūla Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ The other extreme of a very fast PS process involved within a thought moment is very complex
and we do not need to examine it right now. We can learn it, but it can be “seen” only by a
Buddha.
§ In this post we will discuss the idappaccayatā PS cycle, which describes phenomena inreal
time without getting into what happens within a citta (within a thought moment). This process
— just like the PS cycle operates between lives — can be easily understood by anyone.
2. As mentioned in the introduction to PS, whenever we willingly grasp something, whatever results
from that action has a corresponding nature. Because one got attached willingly, a similar bhava will
result: i.e., pati+icca leading to sama+uppada or paṭicca samuppāda (PS). Here, “icca” is
pronounced “ichcha”.
§ In the most fundamental sense, a “greedy state of mind” will result when we get attach with
greed, i.e., one develops a habit or gati or bhava corresponding to that state of mind; a
“hateful state” (habit/gathi/bhava) results via hateful attachment; acts of greed and/or hate are
always done with ignorance.
§ Three examples of uppatti bhava for those three cases illustrate the principle: An excessively
greedy person is likely to get a “peta bhava” and be born as a peta (hungry ghost); a person
who is often engaged in hateful actions towards other beings is likely to develop a “hateful
bhava” and is likely to be born in the niraya (hell) where there is lot of hate due to extreme
suffering; an animal bhava is developed with both greed and hate. Since ignorance is always
there, an animal bhava is cultivated with all three “sans“; this is the root of the word “tirisan =
three sans” for an animal in Sinhala.
3. Now let us look at the idappaccayatā PS, which describes how we develop certain habits or bhava
or gati during a given lifetime. It is often easier to use an example to illustrate these PS cycles. Let us
examine how a teenager becomes an alcoholic.
§ The teenager become friendly with a group of other teenagers who are into drinking. Initially,
he may be reluctant to join in, but due to ignorance he joins them and starts drinking.
§ If a good friend or a family member came to know about the situation they could have
prevented the teenager from associating with such bad company, i.e., ignorance could have
been dispelled by explaining to him the adverse effects of not only drinking, but also of
associating with such a group.
4. The PS cycle thus starts with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“; due to ignorance of the adverse results,
the teenager starts drinking with that group (saṅkhāra = “san + khāra” or actions of accumulating, in
this case bad kamma).
§ The more he is involved with such drinking activities, the more he thinks about it and develops
a “mindset” or viññāṇa for that activity. This is “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“; see, “Kamma are
Done with Saṅkhāra – Types of Saṅkhāra“.
5. When he really begins to like drinking, he starts thinking about it even while doing other things.
This is “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“.
§ In this case, nāmarūpa are the mental images associated with that viññāṇa, i.e., the names and
shape of particular alcohol bottles, the places where he normally drinks, the friends who drink
with him, etc.
§ He thinks about the next “event” and visualizes the scene, all these are associated nāmarūpa.
Thus, here nāmarūpa are the mental images of “things” and “concepts” that one would
like to enjoy.
6. Now his six senses become “involved” to provide a reality to those nāmarūpa; to provide the
desired sense pleasures.
§ In Pāli terms, the six indriya (senses) become “āyatana“. For a lack of a single English word, I
will call an “āyatana” an “import/export facility”, and really get involved in the actions
associated with drinking events.
§ His mind is often thinking about the next “event” (where, when, with whom, etc), he makes
necessary preparations for the “event” using all six senses (now āyatanas), that are in
accordance with the nāmarūpa in the previous step, i.e., “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“,
where saḷāyatana means the six āyatana: the eye is now not merely for seeing, it has become
an assistant in the lookout for a “good drink” or a “good friend to chat with”, etc.
7. Thus we have “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa“, i.e., all six āyatana become actively engaged making
contact with relevant sense objects. His eyes are on the lookout for a favorite drink or a favorite
person to chat with, etc.
§ However, “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa” is just the “uddesa” or short version given in the
standard PS steps. As in many cases, it needs to be explained in detail; see, “Sutta –
Introduction“.
§ Here instead of phassa, it is really called “samphassa” (= “san” + “phassa“), where “san”
implies it not just contact, but a “san” contact; see, “What is “San”? – Meaning of Sansāra (or
Saṃsāra)“.
8. Such “samphassa” lead to vedanā, i.e., “(san)phassa paccayā vedanā“. He experiences “good (but
immoral) feelings” with all those sense contacts.
§ Because of such “good feelings”, he gets further attached: “vedanā paccayā taṇhā“; see,
“Taṇhā – How We Attach via Greed, Hate, and Ignorance“.
9. Now comes, “taṇhā paccayā upādāna“. Upādāna means “grabbing or pulling it close” like an
octopus grabbing its prey with all its eight legs.
§ In the present case, the teenager wants very much to re-live this experience, and he gets
immersed in it; when he is experiencing the event his mind is totally absorbed in it; he does not
think, and does not have the mindset to think about, any adverse consequences.
§ This is the critical “habit forming” or “bhava forming” step.
§ If this habit becomes very strong, it could lead to a new bhava as an animal via the uppatti
paṭicca samuppāda process;see,”Akusala-Mūla Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
10. So, the next inevitable step is, “upādāna paccayā bhavo“; this particular state of getting drunk
becomes more and more ingrained in his mind. It becomes “a bhava” or “existence” or habit that is of
importance to him. He very much wants to re-live that experience.
§ And that is exactly what he gets: “bhava paccayā jāti“. This “bhava” or the kamma seed is now
well established, and he can be born in that “drunken state” quite easily. All he needs is an
invitation from a friend, or even a sight of a bar while travelling, for example.
§ It is natural to get into that state, or be “born” in that state. So, he gets drunk at every
opportunity. See, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein” for more details.
11. However, like everything else, any birth is subjected to decay and suffering: “jāti paccayā jarā,
marana,… dukkhakkhanda samudhayō hōti“. This happens in many stages as we describe below.
§ But in the case of a single drinking event, that state of intoxication comes to an end, possibly
with a big headache and a huge hangover. That episode ends with nothing to show for it, but a
hangover.
§ Even worse, now he is “hooked’; he has formed a bad habit, which only strengthens even more
if he does it again and again. Because each time, the PS runs, the viññāṇa for that habit gets
more fuel, and the bhava gets stronger.
14. It is important to realize that the above PS cycle does not run to its conclusion when the drinking
“event” is over. Rather the cycle can occur repeatedly unless it is stopped willfully, deliberately.
§ And the way to do that is to learn Dhamma and develop good habits and become a
“sampajannō“; see, “Kayanupassana – The Section on Habits (Sampajanapabba)“.
§ However, if the teenager keeps his bad habit, he gets trapped in that bhava, the more jāti that
occurs, i.e., more frequently he will be drunk. When one gets really drunk, one tends to behave
like an animal without any sense of decency, and the long-term consequences could be rebirth
as an animal; see below.
15. And it is not even necessary to participate in a “drinking event” to run another PS cycle. He may
be sitting at a desk trying to study, and may start going through the PS cycle MENTALLY.
§ He would start with mano saṅkhāra and vacī saṅkhāra (vitakka/vicāra or planning), thus
generating (and strengthening) the viññāṇa for drinking, generating nāmarūpa (visuals of
places, friends, alcohol bottles, etc), and thus going through the rest of the cycle: saḷāyatana,
samphassa, vedanā, taṇhā, upādāna, bhava, jāti (“living it”), repeatedly.
§ Thus numerous such PS cycles can run at any time, probably increasing its frequency as the
bhava or the habit builds up.
§ The stronger the bhava or habit is, it will be harder to break it. This is why meditation together
with another good habit to work on should be undertaken to replace a bad habit. While in
meditation, one can contemplate the adverse consequences of the bad habit. Developing a good
habit will keep the mind away from the bad habit. See, “Habits and Goals” and also “Bhāvanā
(Meditation)“.
16. If the teenager keeps his bad habit, that “viññāṇa of a drunkard” will only grow with time. If it
stays strong at the cuti-patisandhi moment (at the end of his human bhava), it could lead to a new
uppatti bhava via the uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda process mentioned in #1 above: “Akusala-Mūla
Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ Such a viññāṇa is likely to give rise to rebirth in the animal realm, as mentioned in # 14.
Note: This post was re-written to replace an early post, “Akusala-Mūla Pavutti (or Pravurthi) Paṭicca
Samuppāda”. I had not realized at that time that what the Waharaka Thero had described in Sinhala as
“Pavutti (or Pravurthi) Paṭicca Samuppāda” is really the idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda in the
Tipiṭaka.
1. There are two opposing factors to deal with when one is trying to convey the message of the
Buddha to others:
§ Foremost, the other person needs to be able to comprehend what I write. If I use too many Pāli
words some people, especially those in the Western world, may not understand fully and also
may get discouraged.
§ On the other hand, I need to be careful not to distort the meaning of some key Pāli words.
Sometimes there is no English word that truly conveys the meaning of a Pāli word. Providing
incorrect information is worse than doing nothing.
2. I would like to test this new approach where I will describe concepts with minimal Pāli words.
When one gets the basic idea, one could “dig in deeper” by reading regular posts.
3. Buddha Dhamma is all about ending suffering and finding permanent happiness IN THIS VERY
LIFE. Paṭicca samuppāda describes how root causes for suffering lead to suffering step by step. If
we understand these root causes for suffering, we can avoid such causes and make sure suffering
would not arise in the future.
§ The Buddha said, we suffer when we cannot maintain things to our satisfaction. Therefore, the
main idea is to see whether there is ANYTHING in this WORLD that CAN BE maintained to
our satisfaction.
§ However, before analyzing the steps in the Paṭicca samuppāda, it is necessary to sort out what
suffering is.
Three Categories of Suffering
The three categories of suffering are described in the Dukkhata Sutta in the Saṃyutta Nikāya. A short
conventional “padaparama“ description is available at:
WebLink: Dukkhata Sutta: Suffering
Here we will discuss it in detail, so that we can get a good understanding of what the Buddha meant
by “suffering”. It is not the feeling (vedanā) of suffering.
1. What is our world? Our existence, our lives, are basically what we experience: we sense things
through our five physical senses and then think about them using our minds. Thus our world can be
summed up by saying that it is what we experience through our INTERNAL six senses (eyes, ears,
nose, tongue, body, mind). If we can have “good experiences” we are happy, otherwise, we get sad
and suffer.
§ Now what we experience depends on WHAT WE SENSE through our physical senses (visuals,
sounds, smells, tastes, touchables) and also WHAT WE THINK ABOUT such experiences
(thoughts and concepts).
§ Those twelve (six INTERNAL and six EXTERNAL) make up “our world”. Everything is
included in those twelve.
§ Mind is complex, so let us first focus on the body and the five physical senses. Before the
end of the essay we will inevitably get to the mind.
2. Let us start our analysis with the simplest ten out of twelve that make up our world:
§ Can we keep our internal physical senses (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body) to our
satisfaction?
§ Can we keep those that we like to experience that are in the outside world (visuals, sounds,
smells, tastes, touchables) to our satisfaction?
3. Let us discuss these two issue one by one. First, let us think about whether we can keep our
physical bodies and its associated senses to our satisfaction.
§ It is true that we can maintain our five physical senses to our satisfaction for many years. And
this is why people do not even take time to think about these ideas. There are many temptations
out there and we cannot wait to “get back to such senses pleasures”. This is why the Buddha
said that the suffering is “hidden behind a veil of apparent pleasures”.
§ We start feeling this hidden suffering when we pass the middle age. Our five physical senses
start getting weaker. The eyesight start dropping, hearing may start decreasing, our tongues
may start losing its ability to taste, our noses becomes less sensitive, and our bodies start
sagging, we may start losing hair, teeth, etc.
§ So, what do most of us do? We start looking for ways to “prop them up”: We can take
temporary measures by wearing glasses, hearing aids, adding more spices/flavor to food, and
doing cosmetic procedures to try to maintain the body appearance. There is absolutely nothing
wrong with some of these “fixes”; for example, we need to be able to see, so we need to take
precautions to protect our eyes and start wearing glasses. Ditto for hearing aids, and even for
adding spices to food. Even doing some cosmetic procedures (coloring the hair, for example)
may be needed to maintain a level of self-confidence as may be the case.
4. But the point is that no matter what we do, there comes a time when nothing works. The whole
body starts falling apart. We may lose all the hair, the skin sagging may no longer be prevented by
surgery; we may lose all hearing; the food may become tasteless. The best way to realize this first
hand is to visit a home for the elderly.
§ We also tend to get sick and come down with diseases easily as we get old.
§ But the worst part is that our brains will start getting weaker which will lead to memory loss
and most importantly the ability to think.
§ If we wait until we get to that stage, it WILL BE TOO LATE. By the time we realize that our
minds are weak, then we become really helpless.
5. Some people just die of unexpected causes before getting to old age. But that is also the same
thing: they could not maintain things the way they expected. We could have prevented at least some
of this suffering if we understood the root causes for suffering, and focused our attention on doing
“fruitful things” while doing some of those temporary measures to keep our sense faculties in good
shape. We will discuss such ‘fruitful deeds” after discussing the suffering associated with external
things in this world.
§ The suffering that we discussed so far arises due to one aspect of anicca: things are subjected to
decay and destruction, and nothing in this world is exempt from that; this is part of what is
called “viparināma dukkhā”, suffering that arises due to change and decay.
6. Now let us look at the EXTERNAL things that make up “our physical world”: visuals, sounds,
smells, tastes, touchables are experienced with our five physical senses.
§ The suffering associated with external things arise NOT necessarily because they are
“impermanent” as is incorrectly believed by many. There are many external things that are
permanent, at least compared to our lifetime in this life. For example, a gold necklace will last
for even millions of years. If there is any suffering arises in anyone due to a gold necklace that
is definitely NOT because that necklace is “impermanent”. We will discuss some examples
below.
7. Of course there are many truly “impermanent” things that we use. And we do become distraught
when they break down. For example, we buy a nice set of dinner plates and if they get broken we
become distraught. But we can always buy another, and that is not a problem especially if one is
wealthy. Even if a wealthy person’s whole house is burned down, that person can easily buy a better
one. So, one would think that wealthy people will be subjected to less suffering.
§ But that is not the case. Even though having wealth helps, as far as suffering is concerned,
wealth is not a big factor. We hear wealthy and famous people even committing suicide all the
time.
§ Most of the suffering associated with external things arise due to “unfruitful thoughts” in our
minds: Suffering arises mainly due to things we are attached to, and things that we like to hate.
This is a KEY POINT and needs a lot of thought.
8. Let us consider some examples to clarify this important point.
§ A hurricane lands and destroys a large cultivated area that results in a significant damage. Most
people who live close-by would be just glad that their homes were not damaged but they will
not become distraught over the loss to that particular land. The only one who suffers is the one
who is the owner of that land. Suffering arises due to a loss or damage or destruction of
something one is attached to. The suffering was not embedded in that land; the only person
who suffered was the one who had an attachment to it.
Let us take another example. A wealthy person A hires person B to live in his house and to take care
of the house and the gardens. Person A may not even live in that house. Person B lives in the house
and takes good care of the house and the gardens. Anyone who does not know the real owner would
think that person B is the owner, the way he takes good care of the house. Person B goes out-of-town
to visit his family for a few days and an enemy of person A burns down the house. Who is the one
that suffers? Person B may feel bad about his employer’s loss, but it is person A who will mostly
suffer due to the loss of the house. Even though person B may have lived in that house for many years
on his own, he did not have any sense of “ownership” to the house; he may become somewhat
distraught because of him having lived there and formed a lesser attachment to the house.
§ In the case of the gold necklace that we mentioned earlier, someone may suffer if she lost it.
The suffering was not due to an “impermanence” associated with the necklace; rather it was due
to the inability of that person to “maintain it to her satisfaction”.
9. Does this mean a person who does not own anything is the happiest? Not at all. Even though one
may not have ownership to anything valuable, that person still has cravings for pleasurable things.
Much of his suffering is due to the INABILITY to GET what he wants. He may want a big house, a
nice car, tasty foods, etc. He suffers not due to a loss of physical items, but his inability to get such
items.
§ Thus whether wealthy or poor does not matter. The real cause of suffering is in our MINDS. A
wealthy person may suffer due to a loss of something he had, and a poor person may suffer due
to the inability to get what he wants. Either person becomes distraught due to his/her mind
activities: attachment to what one has or craving for what one desires. This is another aspect of
the Pāli term anicca. It is mostly mental and is called “saṅkhāra dukkhā”. It arises through the
struggles we engage in trying to maintain things to our satisfaction.
§ For example, when we buy a nice house there are endless things that need to be done to
“maintain it to our satisfaction”; this is also part of saṅkhāra dukkha. Sometimes we don’t even
realize this suffering. Think about how much work we do to prepare a nice meal; then we enjoy
it in 10-15 minutes, and then we need to spend more time cleaning up. We slaved through hours
to get a brief sense pleasure.
10. External things also include people. The amount of suffering due to a loss of a person is directly
proportional to how close that person was to oneself. When person X dies, those who suffer the most
are the closest family; for friends and distant relatives, suffering is less, and for those who do not
even know X, there is no suffering.
§ But it is important to understand that one CANNOT get rid of this suffering by abandoning
one’s family; that would be an immoral act with bad consequences. The attachment becomes
less as wisdom grows, when one starts understanding deeper aspects of Dhamma: Basically,
there is a difference between fulfilling responsibilities, paying back debts, and having
attachment due to greed. But this also will become much more clear as we proceed with
paṭicca samuppāda.
11. Of course saṅkhāra dukkha also arises due to hate. This is a bit deeper, since hate arises as a
“second aspect” of greed. Hate arises when something or someone gets in the way of us getting what
we crave for. We will examine the root causes for hate in paṭicca samuppāda, but for now we need to
keep in mind that someone may be doing something bad (getting in our way), because we may have
done something bad to that person in the past. Things ALWAYS happen for one or more reasons, and
we may not be able to see the reason (or the cause) in many cases, because the rebirth process keeps
things hidden from us.
§ In any case, when we start thinking about a hateful person or a thing, it is ourselves that suffer.
The mere mention of the name of someone that we despise will immediately make us think
about those bad things that the person did, and get “worked up”. We cause this suffering to
ourselves. If we retaliate, then things get even worse.
§ It is good to analyze some of one’s own experiences.
We discuss “dukkha dukkha” , the third and final category of suffering, in the next post: Introduction
2 – The Three Characteristics of Nature.
8.5.2 Introduction 2 – The Three Characteristics of Nature
1. In the previous post, we discussed two of the three main ways that suffering arises, the viparinama
dukkha (suffering due to our inability to maintain things to one’s satisfaction) and the saṅkhāra
dukkha (suffering due to our excess attachment for things). Both these are experienced in this very
life, but unless we take time and contemplate on those, we may not even be aware of those.
§ There is nothing much we can do about the viparinama dukkha, other than to eat well, exercise
regularly, and keep up with healthy habits for maintaining a healthy body and a mind.
§ We can lessen the saṅkhāra dukkha by gradually losing excess attachment to worldly things.
This happens automatically when we start grasping the Three Characteristics of nature, which
we will discuss below.
2. The third category of suffering arises directly: getting burned, stabbed/shot, etc. Beings in the
apāyas encounter this more, and in the niraya (lowest realm) that is all one feels. For example, a
person who made money by killing another or by stealing from another may live well in this life (at
least outwardly), but will be subjected to much suffering in the upcoming births. This is the worst
category of dukkha dukkha, which arises due to immoral actions of the past. Until the death of
the physical body, even an Arahant is subjected to dukkha dukkha.
§ Therefore, the third category of suffering, dukkha dukkha, arises basically due to immoral acts;
see below. The severity of suffering of course depends on the severity of the violation. We will
discuss this in detail in the paṭicca samuppāda (“pati+ichcha” leading to “sama”+”uppada”)
steps in future posts; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“, where it is
briefly discussed how one’s actions lead to effects that are similar “in kind”.
3. All our acts (including speech and thoughts) are saṅkhāra, thus dukkha dukkha arises due to
the worst forms of saṅkhāra, which we call immoral acts.
Everything happens due to a reason (cause). If one does a good deed, that will lead to good results,
and bad deeds will lead to bad results. This is the basis of science and also how nature works. “Every
action has a reaction”; it is guaranteed, sooner or later.
§ This is why rebirth is a reality of nature. There are people who live lavishly with money earned
by immoral deeds; the consequences will be realized in the future rebirths.
§ It also explains why different people are born with different levels of health, wealth, beauty,
etc., and also why there are innumerable varieties of animals with different levels of suffering.
The Three Characteristics
4. Most people can distinguish between moral and immoral acts. Immoral acts are killing, stealing,
inappropriate sexual behavior, lying, slandering, gossiping, harsh speech, and getting “drunk” with
not only drugs or alcohol, but also with wealth, fame, power, etc (The BIG EIGHT as discussed in the
Meditation section).
§ When we also include the wrong views/hate in the mind, there are ten, which are called the ten
defilements or “dasa akusala” in Pāli. These acts not only are inappropriate but also will have
adverse consequences for the well being of everyone. Societies cannot function well if people
act immorally.
5. Most religions teach how to live a moral life, may be with some exceptions for example of killing
of animals as immoral. Basically all religions encourage “building better societies”. Therefore
morality and moral laws are common to all cultures and religions.
§ Without having this moral foundation, it is hard to comprehend the deeper aspects that we will
discuss next, and analyze in the paṭicca samuppāda.
§ However, it is important to realize that one will be free of all ten defilements only upon
reaching the Arahant stage. Keeping the five conventional precepts is a good start.
§ When one starts following the Path, one is bound to break the trend once in a while. A child
learning to walk will fall many times. Many people get discouraged when they do an immoral
act occasionally; but just to realize that one did a mistake, and that it bothers one’s mind, means
one HAS MADE PROGRESS.
6. The uniqueness in Buddha Dhamma is to show that in the wider world view, building better
societies (i.e., living a moral life) is NOT ENOUGH in the LONG TERM in the rebirth process. In
this wider world view, anyone can be born anywhere in the 31 realms, including those dreaded lower
four realms. It is a much bigger world than we normally experience.
§ Doing immoral acts makes one eligible to be born in the lower four realms, and be subjected to
dukkha dukkha. However, even if one does not do a single immoral act in this life, that does
not guarantee avoidance of rebirth in the lower four realms, BECAUSE we all have done
immoral deeds in our previous lives. What we have in the past remain until that kammic
power is exhausted OR until one attains Nibbāna. Again this is part of the “bigger world view”
now spanning time.
7. This was the core message of the Buddha: That no matter how well we live this life (and it is
essential to do that), that does not guarantee a “suffering-free” future. Until one attains at the least the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, one is not free from suffering in the four lower worlds.
§ We can look at it this way too: Even if we live a good, moral life in this life, we do not know
under what conditions we will be born in the next life, even if it is a human life. If we are born
to an immoral family, or be exposed to immoral friends, in the next life we may commit acts
that deserves birth in the four lower realms.
§ This is why we need to strive to attain the Sotāpanna stage in this very life.
8. This is what is embedded in the three characteristics of “this wider world” of 31 realms. We may
be born in the highest Brahma world, but one day that life will end and we will inevitably get to the
four lowest realms (apāyas) at some point. The Buddha said, “there is no refuge” anywhere in these
31 realms.
9. In the previous post we discussed why we “cannot keep any part of our physical body to our
satisfaction”. If we think through how dukkha dukkha arises, we can see that “we cannot maintain
anything to our satisfaction” anywhere in these 31 realms in the long term. This is the first
characteristic of “this world of 31 realms”: anicca. Just one word says it all.
§ Because of anicca, no matter how much we struggle to achieve sense pleasures, we will
eventually encounter suffering, especially in the four lower realms. We always have
viparinama dukkha and saṅkhāra dukkha (both may be hidden in the apparent sense pleasures
temporarily), and we cannot avoid dukkha dukkha without attaining the Sotāpanna stage of
Nibbāna.
§ Thus anicca leads to the second characteristic of dukkha.
§ Therefore, as long as we crave for existence and sense pleasures “in this world”, we are truly
helpless in the LONG TERM; this is the third characteristic of anatta. There is “no refuge” in
this world of 31 realms.
10. At first it is difficult to see why these three characteristics are a such a big deal. They are the KEY
to stop the causes for suffering.
§ Just the realization that it is harmful and unfruitful to attach to things in this world leads to
the first stage of Nibbāna, the Sotāpanna stage. Buddha Dhamma is a complete description of
nature. Just being able to comprehend the unfruitfulness of attachment to worldly things
(and aversion, which arises from attachment as we will see), is the first and most
important step in the Noble Eightfold Path, Sammā Diṭṭhi or “clear comprehension”.
11. It is important to realize that detachment to worldly things CANNOT be done by forcing the
mind. If someone tries to give away one’s wealth without truly realizing the benefits of that, one will
likely to generate friction or remorse later, which could have adverse effects.
§ It may be hard to believe, but the real happiness ARISES (and one will be able to donate things
with joy, because one will automatically see the fruitless of craving for worldly things) as one
starts comprehending the true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta, and realize that it is possible
to stop all three form of suffering. It is permanent sense of relief, and not like a sense pleasure
that lasts only for a short time.
§ As we go through the steps in the paṭicca samuppāda cycles, the meanings of anicca, dukkha,
anatta will become clear. One could and should read other related posts too. At some point,
things will start “clicking” into place and then it will become easier. Just a glimpse of the
“light” will make it easier to “see”.
12. The lack of this knowledge (or even better stated as wisdom or paññā), is called ignorance
(avijjā). Thus the whole paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with ignorance (avijjā), and explains how
avijjā gives rise to dukkha under different conditions. There is another paṭicca samuppāda cycle that
explains how dukkha can be stopped from arising. We will discuss both starting with the next post.
Thus avijjā leads not only to immoral acts, but also to unfruitful acts; both immoral and
unfruitful actions are included in saṅkhāra.
13. I know I am using more and more Pāli words as we proceed. But by now one should be able to
grasp the meaning of those key words; one can always go back to earlier posts in this series to refresh
memory. It is cumbersome to keep stating “it is not possible to maintain things to one’s satisfaction”;
it is much easier to say, “anicca”. No other language can succinctly state the nature of the “whole
world” in just three words: anicca (pronounced “anichcha”), dukkha, anatta (pronounced
“anaththa”).
§ As we saw above, dukkha has much deeper meaning than the “feeling of discomfort or pain”.
§ Even avijjā and paññā do not have corresponding words in English to convey the exact
meaning. As we discuss further, the meanings will become more clear.
§ Thus my goal to is to first describe these key Pāli words in plain English and then use them in
the subsequent posts, while staying away from other Pāli words that are not critical for
understanding the core message of the Buddha.
Next, “Avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“, …………..
8.5.3 Avijjā Paccayā Saṅkhārā
Revised April 26, 2019; August 29, 2019
“Avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” (Ignorance as root cause for immoral/unfruitful actions and
thoughts). That is the same as saying “avijjā nirodha” leads to “saṅkhāra nirodha”. All following
terms in the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle will stop arising and thus all suffering stop
arising with the complete removal of avijjā.
1. Avijjā (loosely translated as ignorance), is defined in many ways: not knowing the Four Noble
Truths, not understanding the Noble Eightfold Path, not understanding the Three Characteristics of
nature, not understanding dukkha, etc.
§ All these are correct, but just reading about them is not going to help. The mind needs sees how
suffering arises due to immoral and unwise actions (and thoughts).
§ The paṭicca samuppāda cycle clarifies how the three kinds of suffering arise. One does not
comprehend the true nature of the world, and think (and do) immoral/unfruitful things.
2. You may be wondering whether I was untruthful when I said this series will be in “plain English.”
Especially If you have not read the first two posts. I did describe these three terms in plain English,
and there is no easy way to get the same meaning across without using Pāli words.
§ So, once I clarify them, I have to use these Pāli terms in order to keep a post to a reasonable
length. One can always go back and read previous introductory posts to refresh memory.
3. The standard interpretation of “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” reads “ignorance leads to mental
formations”. That does not get the underlying ideas across and also misleading. I believe that
“ignorance as root cause and condition for immoral/unfruitful actions” is a better translation, and I
will explain why.
First let us look at the difference between immoral acts and unfruitful acts.
§ We saw that dukkha dukkha in the four lower realms is the worst form of suffering. And we
saw the cause of that as the immoral acts done with the ten defilement or dasa akusala. Thus
worst types of saṅkhāra are responsible for dukkha dukkha in the lower four realms.
§ Why do we do any of such potent immoral acts that give rise to dukkha dukkha of the worst
kinds in the lower four realms? Because to a very high degree of ignorance of the consequences
of such acts. For example, if one does not believe in rebirth, then it is hard to see how such
immoral acts can have consequences. After all, there are many people engaged in unethical
behavior who seem to be enjoying life.
§ Such high level of ignorance is called moha (which means totally covered, totally blind mind),
and the closest English word is “delusion.”
§ A murderer who PLANS and kills another human is a good example. He thinks that if he can
plan it well, he can avoid “getting caught” by the justice system and then will not have to pay
for his actions. There are MUCH WORSE consequences waiting for him, regardless of whether
the police catch him or not. He does not know that he is likely to get killed a thousand times in
return in future births.
4. Thus immoral actions like killing, stealing, etc are responsible for the worst outcomes, the worst
kinds of future suffering; these are the worst forms of saṅkhārā.
§ On the other side of the spectrum for saṅkhāra are the unfruitful actions that lead to lower
levels of saṅkhāra dukkha in this very life. For example, when we get attached to things/people
via strong attachments or dislikes, that can lead to mental suffering in this life.
§ However, such unfruitful actions can also form bad habits that can grow into more significant
problems with time. Someone acting with greed or dislikes habitually can tend to make those
stronger and eventually grow into stronger forms of excess greed and hate, leading to immoral
acts. We will discuss how this happens via the paṭicca samuppāda steps.
§ Of course the severity of the consequences will be according to the severity and nature of the
act: “pati+ichcha” leading to “sama” + “uppada”, as we will discuss in detail later. See,
“Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati + ichcha” + “Sama + uppāda”” for the meaning of paṭicca
samuppāda. When one is even willing to do immoral acts to get what one wants, the
consequences will also be stronger and “in-kind.” Then there are “unfruitful acts” that can lead
to comparatively minor forms of suffering in the near term but can also add up to more
significant effects in the long run.
§ Thus one has to think beyond the five precepts to understand the origin of saṅkhāra dukkha. I
know I am repeating some statements, but I want to make sure to get these essential ideas
across.
I hope it is clear now why “immoral/unfruitful actions, speech and thoughts” is a better translation for
saṅkhāra than “mental formations”. Saṅkhārā are all mental; kāya and vacī saṅkhārā are those
thoughts that LEAD TO actions and speech.
5. Now let us discuss the other erroneous aspect of the translation of “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” as
“ignorance leads to mental formations.” For further details, see, “What Does “Paccaya” Mean in
Paṭicca Samuppāda?“.
§ Ignorance (avijjā) is not there all the time. Even the worst criminal does not do immoral acts or
even unfruitful acts ALL THE TIME. But when he does, such actions are done with ignorance
as a root cause.
§ It applies to all of us: The more we learn Dhamma, the more we get rid of ignorance. Then will
we not think or do either immoral or unfruitful things, i.e., any type of (abhi)saṅkhāra.
6. A closely related issue to think about is what kind of control we have over saṅkhāra. There are
three types of saṅkhāra: kāya saṅkhāra (those that lead to physical acts), vacī saṅkhāra (those that
lead to speech), and mano saṅkhāra (those that automatically arise due to our gati).
§ If we know right from wrong, we can control MOST of our physical actions and speech. We
may even start saying something terrible and stop ourselves in the middle of the sentence.
§ Depending on the emotional state of the mind, it may be not possible to control our actions
under extreme stressful situations. Even a normally calm person may get into a rage if he
catches his wife engaging in sex with another man. He may even kill that man in the heat of the
moment.
§ We also know “good people” who were tempted to do immoral things. That is especially true if
the “payout or the perceived pleasure” was big enough. That is the danger of “not being free of
the four lower realms.”
§ More information at: “Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means“.
7. The third category, mano saṅkhāra, are also hard to control by will power instantly. I think we all
can think about situations where it was hard to control greedy/hateful thoughts. We may start
thinking about something, and the mind takes us all over the place. Such thoughts normally involve
“what we could have,” and also fantasize about all kinds of sense pleasures. One needs to stop such
thoughts and think about their consequences willfully.
§ These can only be lessened and ultimately stopped by changing one’s habits (“gathi”) and
cravings (“āsavas”). That applies to kāya and vacī saṅkhāra done on “impulse” or
“temptations” discussed above.
§ And that comes about by realizing the unfruitfulness of any saṅkhāra. That is strongly related
to comprehending the Three Characteristics. We will be analyzing this in the upcoming steps of
paṭicca samuppāda.
8. Thus the key is to change one’s bad habits over time. Then, gradually, even such mano saṅkhāra
will STOP FROM ARISING.
§ It may be hard to believe, but a significant part of this change of habits and cravings comes
from comprehending the Three Characteristics of this world. One would realize that it does not
MAKE SENSE to hurt others (including animals) to get sense pleasure for oneself. That makes
a BIG DIFFERENCE in one’s outlook about what a “good life is.”
§ Contrary to what most people believe, a life filled with sense pleasures is not a “good, peaceful,
life.” An extravagant life can eventually become a “burdened life” because our body’s ability to
accommodate sense pleasures goes down as we age. This realization itself leads to “cooling
down” of the mind. Anyway, as we discuss further, and if one contemplates more along with
these ideas, these concepts will slowly become apparent.
9. In summary, all three kinds of suffering arise due to saṅkhāra that range from highly
immoral acts to seemingly innocent unfruitful actions. All saṅkhāra arise due to avijjā.
§ That is why “avijjā paccayā saṅkhārā” is the first step in the paṭicca samuppāda cycle, which
ends with “jara, marana, soka, parideva, dukkha, …..” all kinds of suffering.
§ At the Arahant stage, one has removed avijjā (i.e., optimized paññā), and thus abhisaṅkhāra
that lead to rebirth cannot arise; that is Saupadisesa Nibbāna. At the death of the physical body,
the Arahant is not reborn and thus, at that time, all saṅkhāra cease to arise (Anupadisesa
Nibbāna or Parinibbāna or “complete Nibbāna”).
§ That is how “avijjā nirodha” leads to “saṅkhāra nirodha.”
Thus we can see in a simple way how suffering arises with immoral/unfruitful actions as causes. One
engages in such activities due to ignorance of the true nature of the world: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
Here we discussed how ignorance gives rise to saṅkhāra. In the next post, we will discuss how
saṅkhārā leads to viññāṇa (or defiled consciousness). That is the next step leading to dukkha
(suffering).
Next, “Saṅkhāra paccayā Viññāṇa – 1“, ……….
8.5.4 Saṅkhāra Paccayā Viññāṇa – 1
1. “Saṅkhāra paccayā Viññāṇa” is normally translated something like, “with mental formations as
condition, consciousness arises”. But I will show that a more accurate translation is,
“Immoral/unfruitful actions and thoughts as root condition for defiled consciousness”.
§ I will just keep the word viññāṇa without translating as “defiled/unfruitful
consciousness” (which could become cumbersome to repeat also), because the word
“consciousness” cannot fully embody the meaning of viññāṇa. Furthermore, vipāka viññāṇa
(those that arise outside of “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”) are “just consciousness”; see #4
below.
§ Viññāṇa is a step in the paṭicca samuppāda that describes how suffering arises; thus viññāṇa is
NOT neutral or innocuous as the word “consciousness” or “awareness” implies; it is DEFILED
consciousness, contaminated with immoral mental factors such as greed and hate.
§ In contrast, an Arahant has undefiled, pure consciousness; thus an Arahant experiences the
world without any defilements. He/she can see, hear, etc without making any type of
judgement, attachment, or repulsion to what is seen, heard, etc.
Thus we need to realize that viññāṇa is DIFFERENT from “knowing” or “being aware”, which
is what “consciousness” implies. This is very important.
2. For example, two people with opposing political views (A and B) may encounter a politician C on
the street who has views compatible with those of A. Person A will be happy to meet C and may go
up to C, shake his hand and talk to him enthusiastically. On the other hand, Person B will
automatically have irritable thoughts about C and is likely to avoid C. In this case, A and B generated
two very different kinds of viññāṇa upon seeing the same person.
§ On the other hand, suppose there is a fourth person, D, who also knows the politician C AND
suppose D is an Arahant. Now, person D will recognize C as that politician but will not
generate any likes or dislikes about C. That is what “consciousness” is, just recognizing who or
what it is without generating any biases.
3. The other main point is that viññāṇa is multi-faceted. It has embedded in it one’s memories as
well as one’s future hopes and plans, and those lie under the surface. This is what Sigmund Freud
called the subconscious. But there is no separate “subconscious”; there is only one citta at a time.
§ The mind does this with the help of several mental factors (cetasika) like memory (manasikara)
and perception (saññā). We will discuss that in the future.
4. For example, when I am looking at a picture I have what is called cakkhu viññāṇa, i.e., “visual
consciousness”. This is a vipāka viññāṇa and is “just consciousness”.
However, if I have been planning a trip overseas that is still in the “back of my mind”; if I have been
thinking about calling an old friend about whom I just thought of recently, that is also in the “back of
my mind”. Thus at a given time there may be several or even many viññāṇa waiting to come to the
surface.
§ And some of those “subconscious” viññāṇa may disappear, if the reason for it to be there goes
away for some reason. For example, if civil war breaks out in the country that I was planning to
visit, I will abandon that trip and my “viññāṇa” for that will go away. If I stop thinking about
my old friend, that viññāṇa for calling him up may also go away with time. Thus if a given
viññāṇa stops getting “its food” it will die off gradually.
§ The difference between kamma viññāṇa (those that arise due to “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”)
and vipāka viññāṇa is discussed in “Viññāṇa – Consciousness Together With Future
Expectations“.
5. Now we can see how “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” works. The more I think about my old friend,
the more saṅkhāra I am generating; thus I keep “feeding that viññāṇa” and that viññāṇa for calling
him gets stronger.
§ The breaking out of the civil war in that country basically deprived the “viññāṇa for making a
trip to that country” of any food (i.e., now it is not possible to visit that country), and thus the
news effectively killed that viññāṇa.
§ As always, it is best to think about your own situations and see how “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa” works, and also how one can have many types of viññāṇa at the same time, even
though only one is at the forefront at any given time.
6. There is another way that viññāṇa can be divided into two main categories. One is the “base
level” of viññāṇa for an existence or bhava. For example, if a deer is reborn as a human, then that
lifestream will now have a “higher base level of viññāṇa” suitable for a human. Whereas a deer
cannot sort out right from wrong, a human can. Thus at the end of a given “bhava” (say as a deer),
that lifestream gets new, higher “base level” of viññāṇa.
§ The other main category of viññāṇa is the numerous types of viññāṇa that arise in a given
existence that we discussed above. What we perceive through the six senses (eye, ear, nose,
tongue, body, and mind) gives rise to six types of consciousness: vision, hearing, smell, taste,
touch, and concepts. Based on those, we can have infinite types of viññāṇa as we discussed
above. These types of viññāṇa are now in accordance with the type of existence or “bhava”.
For example, a deer does not perceive what is seen at the same level of consciousness as a
human, even if both are looking at the same thing. Sometimes there may be differences in sense
faculties too: a bat cannot see but uses sonar to find its way around. Furthermore, as we
discussed above, there are many types of “subconscious” viññāṇa as well.
§ There are many new concepts introduced in these introductory posts that are critical. One may
need to go back to previous posts and re-read in order to grasps these important concepts.
7. Based on those two categories, there are two main paṭicca samuppāda cycles that describe life “in
this world of 31 realms”:
§ One describes how the “base level” of viññāṇa changes at the end of a “bhava”, say when a
deer is reborn as a human. Here a given lifestream can make a transition from a lower base
level of viññāṇa to a higher (e.g., deer reborn as a human) or vice versa (e.g., human reborn as a
deer). This is the “paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda” cycle.
§ The other paṭicca samuppāda cycle describes how a given lifestream accumulates conditions
for suffering during a given “bhava”. This is where we experience viññāṇa through our daily
activities. This is the “idappaccayatā paṭicca samuppāda” cycle; see, “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca
Samuppāda“.
Let us discuss the viññāṇa associated with this latter one first.
1. Saṅkhāra paccayā Idappaccayatā Viññāṇa
Let us first look at how our consciousness changes basically every moment in an active day. We are
being bombarded with pictures, sounds, smells, tastes, body touches, and we think about all sorts of
things throughout the day. In each single case, we experience a different viññāṇa. This is why
viññāṇa is very complex and multi-faceted.
1. If we take a simple example of looking at a person, there are multiple events that happens in the
mind: the physical eye captures an image of the mind which is processed by the brain and sent to the
mind (details of this will be discussed in the Abhidhamma section later). The mind instantly compares
that image with previous experiences and recognizes that it is a close friend. Happy feelings may
arise instantly too. If we had not seen him for a while, some old memories associated with him may
also instantly pop into our mind. The sum total of all mental factors (feelings, perception, joy, etc)
associated with that “seeing event” is the “eye consciousness” or “cakkhu viññāṇa” at that moment.
§ And this is an example of a “vipāka viññāṇa”. We did not plan to see him, but just bumped into
him.
2. But now based on this vipāka viññāṇa, we may decide to take some actions. We may run to meet
him, give him a hug, and follow-up with even more actions. Most of these could be harmless
saṅkhāra and our experience, consciousness, or viññāṇa is mostly harmless.
§ However, if we instead ran into a person with whom we recently had a serious argument, that
vipāka viññāṇa may lead to a series of “bad saṅkhāra” in our minds and thus lead to a totally
different viññāṇa BASED ON those bad saṅkhāra. we may decide to say something bad to that
person. Now we are doing vacī saṅkhāra that may have adverse consequences. Now our
viññāṇa is different and we feel differently from the above case. We have an agitated state of
mind, and with the slightest provocation from him, we may say or do even more harmful things.
3. When a thought arises in the mind, it has associated with it many mental factors (cetasika) which
characterize how we feel: joy, sadness, greed, generosity, hate, kindness, etc. Viññāṇa encompasses
all such relevant mental factors.
§ In the previous example of persons A and B meeting the politician C, person A’s thoughts
embody happiness while person B’s thoughts embody dislike.
§ For a viññāṇa to arise, there must be some interest in the sense object. For example, we are
bombarded with millions of sense inputs in a day, but we “pay attention to” only a fraction of
those. Each mind has a set of “preferred items” in the background or “in the subconscious”
based on the person’s habits and cravings.
4. Then, the more we “feed a given viññāṇa” by thinking, speaking, doing things related to that, the
more strong it gets. Thus we can see how “habit building” is tightly associated with saṅkhāra. In the
same way, we can “remove a habit” by depriving that associated viññāṇa of its food, i.e., by stopping
thinking or doing things related to it.
§ And that can be done only realizing the benefits of a good habit or adverse consequences of a
bad habit, which was the first step in the paṭicca samuppāda, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”. A bit
of thought should make this clear. Comprehending Buddha Dhamma takes time to think deeply
about how all these things fit together.Just being able to recite the paṭicca samuppāda cycle
does not bring any benefits.
5. A simple example is “building a viññāṇa for getting drunk”: A teenager may not like the taste of
his first drink, but if he keeps doing it due to “peer pressure”, he is likely to build a new viññāṇa for
it. As he builds this viññāṇa, he will keep accumulating saṅkhāra to “feed that viññāṇa”. He will be
thinking about it, talking about it, and of course whenever has the chance he will be drinking. The
more he does any of those saṅkhāra, that viññāṇa will grow. AND even when he is doing something
else, that viññāṇa will be at close to top of the subconscious waiting for an opportunity to come up
and induce him to get drunk.
§ And it works the same way for any type of activity. A teenager studying for an exam, will have
a viññāṇa for it. If he is serious about it, he will be thinking about it more, talking about it, and
studying hard; all those are saṅkhāra too, in this case for his benefit.
The idea is to first not to do any abhisaṅkhāra (strong immoral saṅkhāra) that could lead to birth in
the four lower realms. These kinds of saṅkhāra are the immoral acts, speech, and thoughts. We will
discuss this in the next post.
8.5.5 Saṅkhāra Paccayā Viññāṇa – 2
If you are reading this without reading the earlier posts, you may be wondering whether I was being
untruthful when I said this series will be in “plain English”. I did describe any of the terms used here
in plain English in the previous posts. There is no easy way to get the same meaning across without
using such key Pāli words.
§ So, once I clarify them, I have to use these Pāli terms in order to keep a post to a reasonable
length, AND readable. One can always go back and read previous posts to refresh memory.
In the previous post, we discussed how saṅkhāra can feed and build different types of viññāṇa during
our lifetime. The paṭicca samuppāda cycle which describes that process is the idappaccayatā paṭicca
samuppāda and we discussed the step “saṅkhāra paccayā idappaccayatā viññāṇa” for that paṭicca
samuppāda.
§ Now we will discuss how such idappaccayatā viññāṇa can become strong and be “carried
over” to the future lives; not only that, one of such strong viññāṇa can even determine the next
birth. That is why such strong viññāṇa can become “paṭisandhi viññāṇa” by providing the
“link” to the next next life (that is what “paṭisandhi” means: “sandhi” is connection and “pati”
is bond or making the connection).
§ But the saṅkhāra dukkha associated with this life is due to actions (saṅkhāra) that we do in this
life. Also, the same saṅkhāra that could cause future dukkha dukkha or viparinama dukkha can
also give rise to saṅkhāra dukkha in this life as well. This is an important point to be realized; if
not clear, you may want to go back and review the previous posts.
§ Therefore, we CAN get rid of part of the dukkha (the saṅkhāra dukkha) in THIS LIFE by
understanding Dhamma and acting and thinking accordingly. We can also stop or reduce ALL
types of dukkha in FUTURE LIVES by this process.
If you have forgotten what these terms mean, it is a good idea to go back and refresh memory,
because otherwise it will be difficult to comprehend the upcoming posts in this series as well. And
these terms are critically important for grasping the message of the Buddha. Avijjā, saṅkhāra, and
viññāṇa are key terms that must be comprehended; they do not have corresponding English words.
More on viññāṇa can be found at, “3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious“.
Next, Viññāṇa paccayā Nāmarūpa, ………..
8.5.6 Viññāṇa Paccayā Nāmarūpa
Introduction
1. Nāmarūpa can have different, but related, meanings in different contexts. Nāmarūpa in the
standard Paṭicca Samuppāda is different from the “nāmarūpa” involved in idappaccayā Paṭicca
Samuppāda which takes place moment-to-moment.
§ Basically, idappaccayā means “what happens at this moment depending on the conditions at
this moment”. Thus, it describes “events in real time” that bring vipāka in real time, as well as
vipāka in the future.
§ The standard Paṭicca Samuppāda process describes how viññāṇa energy created within this
lifetime leads to future births (i.e., vipāka in future lives via future births).
2. Therefore, the standard Paṭicca Samuppāda can be called “Akusala-Mūla Uppatti Paṭicca
Samuppāda” and the other can be called “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda”; here “uppatti” means
“birth”.
§ Let us first discuss nāmarūpa involved in idappaccayā Paṭicca Samuppāda, i.e., how a jāti can
arise in the current life, based on one’s avijjā (ignorance) and saṅkhāra (thoughts, speech, and
actions).
§ Jāti is not restricted to “births as a human, a deva, an animal”. Many different jāti (births) arise
during the current life itself; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: Jātidhammādi Sutta Dasaka (SN
35.33)“.
§ We will discuss two examples below which explain how a “thief” and a “drunkard” are “born”
during the current life itself.
Viññāṇa Paccayā Nāmarūpa During a Lifetime
1. The “nāmarūpa” involved in Idappaccayā Paṭicca Samuppāda mainly refer to those “visual
images” created by the person when making an “expectation” (viññāṇa) to achieve/maintain a certain
goal.
§ Here, “nāma” refers to whatever the “name” given to the subject involved in the Paṭicca
Samuppāda process, and “rūpa” are the associated objects themselves. Thus, the
corresponding “nāmarūpa” are the mental images of the subjects in question.
2. Let us take an example. When a thief plans to steal something (say a watch from a store), the
process starts with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”; he starts thinking about the plan because of his
ignorance of the consequences.
§ Here “nāma” or the name is “watch” and “rūpa” is the watch itself. But “nāmarūpa” is the
mental image of that watch: That is formed in HIS MIND.
§ He starts doing vacī saṅkhāra first: thinking to himself about how to go about stealing the
watch. This is “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” and that gives rise to viññāṇa for stealing the
watch.
3. With that viññāṇa (expectation), now he starts visualizing the stealing process. How he would find
a suitable time, and may be distract store employees someway and to pick it up.
§ Now more nāmarūpa become involved: he also makes visuals of how he will be actually doing
the stealing: “nāmarūpa” are the visuals he has in his mind to get the job done.
4. The more he thinks and makes plans (i.e., makes more and more nāmarūpa in his mind, that future
expectation for stealing that object (i.e., the viññāṇa for it) will get stronger.
§ Here the Paṭicca Samuppāda process runs backwards, “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāṇa”. This is
called an “aññamañña paṭicca samuppāda”. [aññamañña : (adj.), mutual.]
§ These forward and backward steps may run back and forth while he is planning the robbery,
and the Buddha said that both viññāṇa and nāmarūpa get stronger due to this feedback. They
depend on each other and feed on each other.
§ The more he thinks about it, the stronger those viññāṇa and nāmarūpa.
§ Ven. Sariputta provided a simile for this inter-dependence between viññāṇa and nāmarūpa
saying it is like two bundles of hay leaning against each other and supporting each other
without any other support.
5. Let us take another case of a teenager who is influenced by his peers to drink alcohol. Because of
his ignorance about the consequences, he engages in such activities and also in planning activities:
“avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”.
§ Here saṅkhāra include not only drinking activities but also planning. Therefore, all three types
of saṅkhāra are involved: mano, vacī, and kāya saṅkhāra.
§ While he is participating in drinking he is doing kāya saṅkhāra; he will be constantly talking
about having such parties and those are vacī saṅkhāra; it is also in the subconscious and many
times a day they come back to his mind as mano saṅkhāra. All these are included in “saṅkhāra
paccayā viññāṇa”.
6. Most people do not realize it, but that process of “thinking and talking to oneself” (vacī saṅkhāra)
can make a big impact in the formation of nāmarūpa and the cultivation of viññāṇa. Many people
spend hours and hours doing that assuming it does not contribute to “viññāṇa (or kamma) formation”;
see, “Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ In the above example, even when he is not drinking, those mano saṅkhāra come to the mind
automatically and he starts consciously thinking about drinking activities: he visualizes pictures
of “party scenes”, including friends, bottles of his favorite drink, any food that goes with it, etc.
§ That conscious thinking is also vacī saṅkhāra, and those also strengthen the viññāṇa via,
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”.
§ Now those mental pictures that arise during that process are nāmarūpa that arise due to
“viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa”. Therefore, Paṭicca Samuppāda steps do not just flow in one
way. They can run forward and backward.
7. If the teenager keeps his bad habit of drinking, he gets trapped in that bhava (state of mind of a
drunkard), the more jāti that occurs, i.e., more frequently he will be drunk. When one gets really
drunk, one tends to behave like an animal without any sense of decency, and the long-term
consequences could be rebirth as an animal.
§ If that “viññāṇa of a drunkard” stays strong to the time of death (cuti-paṭisandhi moment at the
end of his human bhava), it could lead to a new uppatti bhava via the uppatti Paṭicca
Samuppāda process mentioned in #1 above. We will discuss this second type of Paṭicca
Samuppāda
§ The important point is that such a paṭisandhi viññāṇa is likely to give rise to rebirth in the
animal realm, as mentioned above.
8. In both these examples, it is clear that those reverse steps also occur: “nāmarūpa paccayā
viññāṇa“, can happen, and does happen, together with “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa”. The more one
visualizes related nāmarūpa, the stronger that viññāṇa gets.
§ As we saw above, this happens in other steps too (for example, “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”
and “viññāṇa paccayā saṅkhāra”) and such is referred to as an “aññamañña paṭicca
samuppāda step”. Here “aññamañña” means “inter-dependent”.
§ This is especially true also for the “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”. The more stronger the viññāṇa
gets, one is more likely to engage in same kind of acts, i.e., saṅkhāra, i.e., “viññāṇa paccayā
saṅkhāra”. They feed on each other. This happens a lot in habit formation; see, “9. Key to
Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati).”
Viññāṇa Paccayā Nāmarūpa at Paṭisandhi
1. At the end of an existence (bhava), a given lifestream is making a quantum transition (meaning a
large instantaneous jump) from one kind of an existence to another; for example, from a deer to a
human or vice versa. The basic level of viññāṇa changes from that of a deer to a much higher level of
a human in the first case.
§ That transition happens in the latter part of the last citta vīthi of the life of the deer. This is
discussed in a bit more detail in the post “Cuti-Paṭisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description”.
2. The key point is that at the end of the last citta vīthi of the deer, a very fine human body called
gandhabba emerges from the dead body of the deer. This fine body cannot be seen with the naked
eye. This gandhabba is formed by the kamma vipāka that gave rise to this new human life, and
blueprint of the grown human is in that gandhabba. This is the new “nāmarūpa” of that lifestream.
§ This blueprint of the human physical body thus has all the important details of the new life
(jāti); for example, sex type, the height, shape, any major physical disability, etc. Some minor
features such a skin color or hair color may depend on the parents, but even those may be
influenced by the kamma vipāka that gave rise to this new existence.
3. Thus as soon as the viññāṇa for the next existence was determined at the last citta vīthi by the step
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”, the next step of “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” gives rise to the
nāmarūpa for the next life.
§ Thus here “nāma” includes the basic level of viññāṇa for the new human existence, which is
much different from the “nāma” of a deer. Obviously, the “rūpa” is that of a human form and
not of a deer. Thus “nāmarūpa” makes a huge transition at the end of the “bhava” as a deer.
4. I have discussed previously how a deer could be reborn many times as a deer until the kammic
energy of the “deer bhava” is exhausted; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“.
§ In such instances, at the death of the deer, another “deer gandhabba” emerges from the dead
body and waits for a suitable womb for “deer mother” becomes available. Here the new
“nāmarūpa” may be somewhat different, but still that of a deer, so any change would be minor.
§ Therefore, the “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” gives rise to a new set of “nāmarūpa” only at the
paṭisandhi to a new existence.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
920 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
Viññāṇa is a key concept in Buddha Dhamma. It can be analyzed at various levels, and a deeper
analysis is at “Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
Next, “Nāmarūpa Paccayā Saḷāyatana“, ………
8.5.7 Nāmarūpa Paccayā Saḷāyatana
2. For example, I am walking on the road and see a nice house. I just happened to see it due to a
kamma vipāka, and my eyes were working as indriya; they just presented a picture of that house to
my mind. It is a neutral event.
§ But now, if I form an attachment to the house, I start looking at it for a while (with
cakkhāyatana). I am thinking about how nice that house is and even about building one like
that. At the point, I am using my mind as a āyatana too (mana indriya now becomes
manāyatana).
§ I have formed greedy thoughts about the house and now I am accumulating new kamma by
generating vacī saṅkhāra (talking to my self with vitakka/vicāra). I am using my eyes and mind
both as āyatana (cakkhāyatana and manāyatana): I keep looking at the house and keep thinking
greedy thoughts.
Indriya Become Āyatana With Abhisaṅkhāra
3. In many cases, when we experience a sense event due to one indriya, we may start using some or
all of the indriya as āyatana. In another example, someone offers us a piece of a tasty cake (which is
a kamma vipāka), and like it so much we may use all six āyatanas to accumulate more kamma (smell
and touch it and then ask for the recipe and think about how to make it or where to buy it).
§ Those “extra activities” that we do with āyatana could be abhisaṅkhāra. But just eating a cake
is not abhisaṅkhāra; see, “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha”.
§ Most of the time we use our sense faculties as indriya: we see, hear, etc many things in a day
but ignore most of them. But when we experience something that has a craving (anusaya) for,
then we start using our sense faculties as āyatana. The akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle
operates only when we use our sense faculties as āyatana.
§ An Arahant ALWAYS uses his/her sense faculties as indriya. He/she will see, hear, etc just like
us, but will not get “attached to” anything.
4. Saḷāyatana has somewhat different meanings in the idapaccayatā and paṭisandhi paṭicca
samuppāda cycles. That is very much like for nāmarūpa that we described in the previous post.
§ At birth (especially in a new bhava or existence), we get a “new set of sense faculties” or
indriya. For example, if a human is reborn as a brahma, that brahma will have only eyes, ears,
and the mind; there will be only three indriya (or āyatana), instead of six for the human. But we
keep the term “saḷāyatana” in the paṭicca samuppāda as a generic term.
§ Thus in paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda, we are concerned with formation of a brand new set of
āyatana for the new existence (bhava).
§ However, when we consider the idapaccayatā paṭicca samuppāda series, we are concerned
with how the six āyatanas for a human change from even moment to moment. One may be
looking at something, listening, tasting, etc.
Nāmarūpa paccayā Saḷāyatana at Paṭisandhi
5. At the end of existence (bhava), a given lifestream is making a quantum transition (meaning a
large instantaneous jump) from one kind of an existence to another. At that time, the base level of
viññāṇa for the lifestream makes a quantum jump and this is basically the “nama” of the nāmarūpa.
The nāmarūpa for the new existence also has the blueprint for the new physical body, which is the
“rūpa” part.
§ As we did in the previous post, let us consider the case of a lifestream making a transition from
a deer to a human. The basic level of viññāṇa changes from that of a deer to a much higher
level of a human; this new level of viññāṇa together with the blueprint for the new human
shape is in the new nāmarūpa of the gandhabba that comes out of the body of the dead deer, as
we saw before.
§ Now when this gandhabba descends to the womb of a human mother, the human baby starts to
grow. Six sense faculties (indriya) suitable for a human grows in the womb, which will become
saḷāyatana at times in the future after the birth.
6. In another example, a human who exhausted his kammic energy for the human bhava at death, and
becomes a deva in one of the deva realms. At the cuti-paṭisandhi transition in the last citta vīthi of
that human, the human gandhabba dies. In the next moment, a deva gandhabba is born.
§ All devas are born fully-formed. There is no need for a mother’s womb. This is an opapātika
birth.
§ When that human dies, his body becomes inert like a log. At the very instant, a fully-formed
deva appears in the appropriate deva world.
§ This deva will have sense faculties appropriate for a deva. Those are the indriya for the new
existence. Those indriya can become āyatana at times depending on the activities of that deva.
Nāmarūpa paccayā Saḷāyatana during a Lifetime
7. During a given lifetime of a deer, human, or a brahma, that lifestream will have a basic set of
indriya (that become āyatana at times) appropriate for that existence: the sense faculties for a human
are different from that of a deer or a brahma.
§ But during that lifetime, those āyatana will have minor changes (compared to the drastic
changes at paṭisandhi) depending on the activity. Idapaccayatā paṭicca samuppāda cycle
describes such changes.
8. In the previous posts, we discussed the case of a thief who is planning a theft. His viññāṇa about
the theft led him to generate appropriate nāmarūpa (the visuals in his mind of how the theft is carried
out).
§ When he is planning the theft, he will use his sense faculties as āyatana to do the “preparatory
work”. He will read about the place to be robbed or ask around for relevant information, etc.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
922 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
Each time he does a specific act (whether thinking, seeing, hearing, etc), a separate paṭicca
samuppāda cycle operates. We will discuss this later, after going through all the steps in a
number of more posts.
§ Now when he is about to carry out the theft, his indriya transform or attune for the task and
become āyatana. All his sense faculties will be on high alert. He is watching and listening
carefully for anything unexpected, and his whole body becomes tense pumped with adrenaline.
§ All his āyatana will be employed to carry out the task. He will be using his body, eyes, and ears
as āyatana. For example, if he is about to be caught, he will use the body to run away.
§ At the planning and execution stages, there are many, many paṭicca samuppāda cycles
associated with each stage. We will discuss that at the end of the series as mentioned above.
Next, “Difference between Phassa and Samphassa“, ……….
8.5.8 Difference between Phassa and Samphassa
§ To put it in another way, an Arahant sees, hears, …things as they really are without any bias
added.
4. We can now see the difference between “phassa” and “samphassa“.
§ In the case of an Arahant, there is only “phassa” or mere contact with the external sense input.
An Arahant will thus “see” or “hear” or “smell” or “taste” or “feel” the same things as any
other person. But an Arahant will not be attached or repulsed by that sense experience.
§ For example, the Buddha identified different people. But he did not form a special liking for
Ven. Ānanda (his personal assistant) or had any hateful thoughts about Devadatta who tried to
kill him. He treated the poorest person the same way as he treated a king.
§ The Buddha ate most delicious food offered by the kings and also ate the meager meals offered
by poor people without any preference.
§ In all those sense contacts, it was just “phassa“, and not “samphassa“.
5. On the other hand, an ordinary person will form a like or a dislike for some of the sense inputs (but
not for all).
§ If a like or dislike is formed, then that sense contact is “san phassa“(“san” + “phassa“, where
“san” is what we accumulate to extend the sansāric journey; see, “What is “San”?“). It is
normally pronounced “samphassa“.
§ Thus, when one see, hear, smell, taste, touch something, whether there is going be any likes or
dislikes towards that sense experience depends on that person, or more specifically the “gati” of
that person.
6. “Samphassa” is intimately connected to one’s “gati” or habits most of which come from our past
lives, even though some may be strengthened or weakened by what we do in this life. We may even
start forming new “gati” in this life.
§ There are many posts at this site that discuss “gati“, and at the very basic level both “ānāpāna”
and “satipaṭṭhāna” meditations are all about removing bad “gati” and cultivating good “gati“;
see “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati).”
§ “Samphassa” is also intimately connected to the relationships we have with other people and
material things. Any kind of sense input on such people/things will automatically generate
“samphassa“. On the other hand, an Arahant has removed all bonds with people/things, and
thus will generate only “phassa“.
7. Let us discuss some examples to illustrate how “samphassa” arises. First let us look at the
connection with those people/things in the world that we have special relationships with or what we
“upādāna“, i.e., like to either keep close to like to stay away from.
§ Think about the worst “enemy” you have. When you even think about that person X, you
generate distasteful feelings. But that person’s family will have loving thoughts about that
person. Here, you and X’s child (for example), would have generated very different
“samphassa” when thinking, seeing, hearing, about X.
§ When you travel by car or bus and looking out of the window, you may see zillion things, but
those are just “seeing”; you don’t pay much attention to them. They are “phassa“. But now if
you happen to see a beautiful house, it piques your interest and you may even turn back and
take another good look at it, and may be even think about how nice it would be to live in a
house like that. That is “samphassa“.
8. Our sansāric habits (“gati“) play a key role in generating “samphassa“.
§ Some people enjoy harassing animals; they pay to go see cockfighting. Others are repulsed by
that. Those are sansāric habits. So, the scene of two animals fighting for life leads to the
enjoyment of some and to the disgust of others; both are “samphassa“, but one is obviously
immoral. The other is moral but still keeps one bound to saṃsāra; this latter statement may take
time to digest.
§ Ladies, in general, like nice clothes, jewellery, etc. and men are more into sports. When a
husband is watching sports on TV the whole day, the wife may not have any interest and may
even get angry at him for not paying attention to other things that need to be done around the
house.
§ These and zillion other things come from our sansāric habits.
9. Now let us see how one’s perception of what is “valuable” can lead to “samphassa“. Suppose
someone inherits a valuable gem from his father. Every time he sees it or even thinks about it, he
becomes happy. But his mind is also burdened by it, since he is worried that he may lose it; he is
keeping it in a safe and has put burglar alarms in the house just to protect that gem.
§ Now, suppose one day he gets to a professional to evaluate the gem and finds out that it is
really worthless. He may not even believe that initially, but once it sinks in that it is indeed
worthless, he will become “detached” from it. He will no longer keep it in the safe and may
even throw it away in disgust.
§ Now he may be generating either neutral or hateful thoughts about the SAME OBJECT that he
once loved so much. Nothing changed about the “gem”; it is still the same object as before.
What has changed is his PERCEPTION of the value of that object. Whereas he generated
“samphassa” on thinking or seeing that object before, now he may generating just
“phassa” (neutral feelings) or “samphassa” with quite opposite feelings of disgust.
10. Let us take another example that was given by one of my teacher Theros. This one clearly shows
how transition from “phassa” to “samphassa” or the other way around can happen very quickly.
The following happened many years ago in Sri Lanka. A mother had to go overseas when her son was
less than a year old. She had been overseas for many years and came back to meet her son.
Apparently, she had not even seen any pictures of the boy, who was now a teenager. When she gets
home, she is told that the boy is visiting a neighbor and she starts walking there. On the way she
bumps into a teenager; the teenager apologizes and she resumes walking. But then another person on
the street says, “Don’t you recognize your son? Well. How can you? You have been away all this
time”. Hearing that, she says, “Oh, is that my son?” and immediately runs back and hugs him.
§ She clearly saw the boy when he bumped into her and apologized. But at that time, he was just
a teenager to her. That “seeing” event involved “phassa“.
§ But when someone pointed out that it was her son, the whole perception of the boy took a big
leap in an instant. Now she looks at the same boy with the whole new set of “mental baggage”.
Now it is not just a teenager, but her son; there is attachment involved. Now when she looks at
him it is “samphassa” that is involved.
11. Now we can also see how “samphassa” lead to an intensified vedanā or feelings. This is called
“samphassa jā vedanā” or “vedanā arising due to samphassa”.
§ She had neutral thoughts (may be even some annoyance) when the boy bumped into her
apologized. But when she learned that it was her son, her feelings turned instantly to joy.
§ To take a bit more further, if that teenager then got hit by car after several minutes, that joy
would turn instantly to sorrow.
§ All these different types of “vedanā” arise based on the type and level of “attachment” to a
given object, in this case the boy.
12. Therefore, now we can see that the step, “phassa paccayā vedanā” in Paṭicca Samuppāda really
is “samphassa paccayā vedanā”.
§ More details on how “samphassa” leads to vedanā (feelings) can be found at: “Vedanā
(Feelings) Arise in Two Ways“.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Paṭicca Samuppāda 925
1. In the previous post, we discussed the difference between “phassa” and “samphassa“. To
summarize:
§ An Arahant will always have “phassa“, whether it is due to a kamma vipāka (i.e., a sense
impression comes in due to a kamma done in the past) or whether he/she is using the sense
faculties for a given purpose. Here “phassa” is pure mental contact; it is just seeing, hearing,
smelling, tasting, touching, or just an arbitrary thought that comes to the mind without one’s
own likes/dislikes.
§ An ordinary person will also have “phassa” when sense inputs come in as kamma vipāka. For
example, one may be walking down the street and happen to see an expensive ring on the road.
That initial “seeing” is due to a kamma vipāka. But now he gets interested in it and picks it up
and examines it; those follow-up acts may be done with “samphassa“, which in turn lead to
more kamma generating future kamma vipāka.
§ Thus the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda involves “saḷāyatana paccayā samphassa“, even
though it is normally written as “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa“.
2. “Phassa” is the pure mental contact. “Samphassa” is the mental contact that has incorporated one’s
own likes/dislikes about the sense contact.
§ In an earlier post, we also talked about the difference between “indriya” and “āyatana“, i.e.,
how our sense faculties can be used in either way. Note: These six indriya are different from
the indriya in pañca indriya, which are sati, samādhi, saddhā, viriya, and paññā.
§ Our basic sense faculties are the “indriya“; when they are used with likes/dislikes they become
“āyatana“. Since there are six of them there are six “āyatana” or “saḷāyatana“.
3. In the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda series that describe how our actions that start with
ignorance (avijjā) eventually lead to suffering, what comes to play is “saḷāyatana“, i.e., “nāmarūpa
paccayā saḷāyatana“. Thus, we are talking about instances where we use our sense faculties as
“āyatana“.
§ Therefore, it is clear that the next step should be “saḷāyatana paccayā samphassa” instead of
the normally used, “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa“.
§ But conventionally “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa” is used because it rhymes better that way.
One is supposed to know that it is really “samphassa” that comes into play here.
4. Let us take an example to go over the steps of the paṭicca samuppāda up to now as a review.
Suppose there is a teenager who come to associate friends that belong to a street gang. They tell him
that one needs to enjoy life and has to do “whatever it takes” to make money to enjoy life. If the
parents do not have close contacts with the teenager, there is no one to explain to him the perils of
such a way of life, and he embraces this wrong vision or “micchā diṭṭhi“.
§ Thus due to ignorance (avijjā), the teenager starts doing, speaking, and thinking like those gang
members: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“.
§ Then what occupies his mind most of the time is thoughts related to gang activities and seeking
pleasures by using drugs and alcohol: “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa“. During gang activities his
thoughts are focused on them, and what is in his subconscious during other times is also related
to such activities.
§ This leads to “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa“. He thinks about and visualizes various gang
activities: How to sell drugs to make money and how he will enjoy rest of the time hanging out
with the gang.
§ Thus all his six sense faculties become “āyatana“: they all are used to find ways to optimize the
gang activities and to think about ways to “have to fun”: “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana“.
§ Thus inevitably, the sense contacts he makes are attuned for such activities: “saḷāyatana
paccayā phassa” or more explicitly, “saḷāyatana paccayā samphassa“. Most of his sense
contacts are defiled with greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ Accordingly, most his feelings are associated with such defiled sense contacts: He gets angry
dealing with rival gangs, takes pleasure in beating them up, gets pleasure from drinking and
using drugs, etc. Thus “(sam)phassa paccayā vedanā” ensues.
5. Now we can see how he gets more and more absorbed in gang activities; he gets pleasure from
them. Gang activities become regular habits. He gets “stuck”, or “gets attached to gang activities” via
both greed and hate. This is “vedanā paccayā taṇhā“; see, “Taṇhā – How we attach via Greed, Hate,
and Ignorance“.
§ The more he continues such activities, it will become harder to dissociate from them. He thinks
about those activities even when not actively doing them. Those start working in his
“subconscious”; he dreams about them, etc.
§ We need to remember that consciously thinking (or talking to oneself) is also vacī saṅkhāra
and are kamma that will bring vipāka.
6. Such strong attachments to gang activities this lead to “upādāna“: Upādāna (“upa” +”ādāna“,
where “upa” means “close” and “ādāna” means “pull” or “attract”; thus gang activities becomes very
close him. Those are what he thinks, speaks, lives, all day long: “taṇhā paccayā upādāna“.
§ Among those gang activities, he may especially get attached to certain specific acts: could be
alcohol, drugs, or even beating up other people or killing them. And such a specific thing would
be his favorite, and that is what he will follow enthusiastically and others will also encourage.
§ Within the gang there may be a sub-unit that mostly he hangs with. They will enjoy doing their
favorite things together, and the gang may assign specific tasks to them which they are known
to do well.
7. This leads to preparation of future “existence” or “bhava“. For example, suppose his sub-unit
becomes notorious for hurting rival gang members. They take pleasure in beating up someone or in
some cases even killing someone. He will acquire the mindset of a violent animal. He will become
easily agitated and angry.
This is “upādāna paccayā bhava“.
§ His “bhava” has drastically changed from that of an innocent teenager to that of a violent
animal at times.
8. This progression from “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” to “upādāna paccayā bhava” does not happen in
a linear sequence.
Some steps go back and forth. For example, “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” is inevitably also followed by
the reverse “saṅkhāra paccayā avijjā“, i.e., the more wrong things he does, that also solidifies his
ignorance. When he starts enjoying those immoral acts, he will tend to think that is what will provide
him happiness in the future. His mind will be more and more covered with kamachanda (strong
greed) and vyāpāda (strong hate), the two main components of the five hindrances.
§ His ability to think clearly will be suppressed by the five hindrances, and avijjā (ignorance) will
grow; thus “saṅkhāra paccayā avijjā” will also take place.
§ There can be many such “inter-loops” that tend to strengthen the downward progression of that
teenager.
9. Let us discuss the concept of a “bhava” in more detail. Since many people get confused with the
terms “bhava” and “jāti“, it is important to be able to distinguish between the two.
§ This is why science has not yet realized the way to handle mental phenomena. Since most
“reactions” come later in this life, or even in future lives, it is not easy to see these “action/
reaction” or “kamma/kamma vipāka” relationships.
10. Not all kamma are the same. Some kamma (and corresponding saṅkhāra) are harmless, i.e., they
are not potent. Anyone who lives in this world (even an Arahant until death) has to do saṅkhāra to
live: An Arahant has to walk, speak, think about things and all these can be considered to be kamma
(saṅkhāra). In some cases, they are put in the category of kriya to specifically separate them.
§ But what we are concerned with kamma that involve greed, hate, and ignorance. Anytime that
happens those kamma (saṅkhāra) are potent. They can bring about significant results or kamma
vipāka.
§ The clearly strong kamma (saṅkhāra) are called kamma patha (or abhisaṅkhāra). Killing one’s
parents is a kamma patha or a abhisaṅkhāra; since it is immoral, it is called an
apuññābhisaṅkhāra (apuñña + abhisaṅkhāra). It will lead to very bad consequences (kamma
vipāka).
§ Saving the life of a human is also a abhisaṅkhāra; since it is a moral one, it is called a
puññābhisaṅkhāra (puñña + abhisaṅkhāra). It will lead to very good consequences.
§ As we discussed above, those good or bad consequences may not be apparent even in this life;
but they are likely to bear fruit in future lives.
11. How the consequences or “reactions” or kamma vipāka due to good or bad kamma are brought
about involves the concept of a “bhava” which can also called a “kamma beeja” or a “kamma seed”.
§ Every time one does a good or bad kamma, the potential to bring about its results remains with
him/her. And the more one does the same, that potential (or energy) grows. It is said that such
acts prepare a “bhava” or existence appropriate for that kamma.
§ For example, as the above discussed teenager keeps doing his violent acts, he is making a
“bhava” or a “kamma seed” appropriate for bringing about their consequences.
§ During a lifetime, these “bhava” mostly bring about environments suitable for conducting
similar acts. It becomes his “state of existence” or “bhava“. He keeps acting violently, and
may even act like an animal at times. His “animal-like gathi” or “animal-like habits” will grow.
§ This “bhava” is called a “kamma bhava” and he may “born” in that existence many times
during the lifetime. That is described by the idapaccayā paṭicca samuppāda that we are
discussing now.
§ Of course, when this bhava gets stronger with maintaining that life style, it may grow to be
strong enough to bring in a birth in an actual “animal bhava”. That is described in the uppatti
paṭicca samuppāda which we will discuss later.
12. Going back to our example, it becomes easier for that teenager to get that state of existence
(bhava); he can be provoked easily and he can hurt someone without much remorse. Thus whole
“Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda” cycle can run many times during a day as we will discuss in the
next post.
§ This is why stopping such actions early is important. If one has learned correct “ānāpāna” or
“satipaṭṭhāna“, then one would know not to keep doing such acts.
§ This is also why the environment (parents, family, friends, teachers, etc) plays such a huge role
in one’s life at young age. We all have both good and bad tendencies (“gathi“) coming from
previous lives. Which ones get to grow further depends on how one’s life is directed by the
environment especially at young age. When one is old enough one could of course make even
drastic changes with effort.
13. As a given “kamma bhava” gets stronger with repeated actions, it can become a “uppatti bhava“,
i.e., the kamma seed has now become strong enough to provide a paṭisandhi (rebirth) to a new bhava
or existence at the end of the current existence (bhava) as a human; this is the cuti-paṭisandhi
transition that happens in the last citta vīthi of the human existence.
§ Details of this have been discussed in other posts and will be discussed in the next post as well,
but the important things here is the concept of a strong kamma seed that can give rise to a new
existence (rebirth) or a “uppatti bhava“.
§ Such strong kamma seeds suitable for uppatti bhava can grow over many lifetimes as well.
§ It is likely that we all have many such good and bad strong kamma seeds that we have acquired
in our previous lives. From all those good and bad kamma seeds that are potent enough to
provide paṭisandhi, the most strong one comes to the forefront of the mind at death (if the
kammic energy for the present bhava as a human is exhausted). We will discuss this in detail in
the next post, but the difference between “bhava” and “jāti” has been discussed in, “Bhava and
Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
We will discuss more details in the next post that will wrap-up this series: “Bhava paccayā Jati…
.Jara, Marana,…“.
8.5.10 Bhava Paccayā Jāti….Jarā, Marana,…
1. In the previous post we discussed how repeated immoral actions of a teenager can bring about a
specific type of existence (bhava) even during the current life and that this is called a kamma bhava.
§ We also discussed how such kamma bhava can get stronger with time and become strong
enough to lead to a whole new existence at death; this is called a uppatti bhava.
§ Thus there are two types of “bhava“: those that can bring about “experiences” during the
current life (kamma bhava) and those that become strong enough to power a whole new
existence (uppatti bhava).
§ This is explained in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭiccasamuppāda vibhaṅga“: “Tattha katamo
upādānapaccayā bhavo? Bhavo duvidhena—atthi kammabhavo, atthi upapattibhavo“, i.e.,
“What is upādānapaccayā bhavo? Two types of bhava – kamma bhava and uppatti bhava“.
2. Another way to look at the concept of a “bhava” is to treat it as a seed. As we discussed in the
previous post, when we do any act with ignorance (and greed or hate), that leads to the generation of
a kamma seed with some energy to bring about results in the future; this is the same as saying that a
“bhava” was created by that action. The concept of a kamma seed is easier to comprehend.
§ Just like a normal seed has the potential to give rise to a plant, a kamma seed (or a “bhava“)
has the potential to bring about a “jāti” or a “birth”, either during this life or in preparing a
new life.
§ In most posts, I write it as jāti (which is the conventional English term used), but it really is
pronounced “jāti“.
3. Let us take the example of the tennager that we discussed in the previous post, “Phassa paccayā
Vedanā….to Bhava“. Because of the influence of his friends, the teenager starts dealing and using
drugs and gradually gets drawn into the gang to become a gang member, and eventually starts doing
violent acts of beating and killing people.
§ When he did the first beating his friends probably had to encourage or even force him to do it.
Now let us suppose that he did not have a sansāric habit of doing that kind of violent acts. So,
when he did the first act, a small kamma seed (or a “bhava“) was energized.
4. The next time he did something similar, this initial kamma seed made it easier for him to do the
second act. Once he did that, the seed got bigger, and the next time he may not need much
encouraging, and so on. The more he does it, the more easily he can get into that “bhava“, i.e., the
stronger that kamma seed becomes.
This is none other than many idapaccayātā PS cycles running that start with “avijjā paccayā
saṅkhāra” (doing immoral deeds due to avijjā), and leading to “upādāna paccayā bhava”, making
that bhava (or kamma seed) strong.
§ This is another way of expressing “habit (gati; pronounced “gathi”) formation” that I have
discussed in many other posts. The more one does acts suitable for a certain “bhava“, the
viññāṇa for similar behavior grows, and it is easier for one to be “born” in a corresponding
state; this is “pati+ichcha” leading to “sama+uppada” as pointed out in the introductory post,
“Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ Thus, the more the teenager does violent acts, it become easier for him to be “born in that
state”, i.e., the more easier for him to do similar acts.
§ In other words, repeated saṅkhāra leads to strengthening the corresponding mindset or viññāṇa,
and it propagates down the paṭicca samuppāda series to make “kamma bhava“.
5. Now let us consider when that kamma seed or “kamma bhava” gives rise to a “jāti” in pavutti
paṭicca samuppāda. One day, his drug deal is sabotaged by a rival gang member, and he gets angry.
Now he is easily “born” in that “animal-like violent state”. He starts beating up that guy. This is
“jāti” in this case.
§ When the beating is almost done, that “jāti” is almost over with; it is at the “jara” (decay) stage
and when it is done that is the end or death (“marana“) of that “jāti“.
§ Thus when that episode is over, that temporary “jāti” of “a violent existence” is over.
§ The rest of it, “soka, parideva, dukkha, domanassa” or many forms of suffering comes later in
that life or even in future births. The kamma seed that helped him do that act, itself got even
stronger.
6. The kammic energy of that kamma seed was not spent giving rise to that jāti that happened during
that particular instance. That is because that was not a case of kamma vipāka. Rather, that kamma
seed got stronger, because the teenager did more apuñña abhisaṅkhāra (i.e., immoral deeds).
§ Now, if during that confrontation with the other rival gang member he himself gets beaten up,
then that is due to a kamma vipāka.
§ In either case, that “birth” or ‘jāti” (the confrontation with the rival gang member) would give
him only misery at the end: “soka, parideva, dukkha, domanassa”.
§ Many such idappaccayatā samuppāda cycles can operate during even a day and he may be
“born” repeatedly in that confrontational state. Some may be minor, like getting mad at his
friends but some could be violent. He has prepared the “bhava” and he can get into “jāti” or be
“born in that bhava” easily. I am mixing up English and Pāli words in order to make the
meanings clear and to get used to those terms.
§ Just like when a seed is made it is easy to get that seed to germinate, once we prepare a “bhava”
it is easy to be born in that type of existence.
7. Now we can see that a “bhava” or a “kamma seed” is the potentiality for a particular kind of
existence or a “state of mind” during the current life itself.
§ He will be easily transitioned to that “state of mind” (or bhava). For example, he may be having
a good time with his family and be with a “normal state of mind”. Then he gets a phone call
from a fellow gang member asking for his help with a gang-related activity.
§ He will instantly be transitioned to the “gang mentality” and be born a gang member. Then he
will engage in whatever gang activity.
§ But any birth (or jāti) will come to an end. When that activity is over, he may come home and
be part of the family life.
§ However, that “bad jāti” will ALWAYS lead to “jarā, marana, soka, parideva, dukkha
domanassa”. Even if that particular was successful and he leaves there happily, that
ACTIVITY will lead to suffering in the future. He had accumulated more kammic energy for
that “bad bhava”.
8. But the important thing to remember is that “bhava paccayā jāti” does not mean he is guaranteed
to be born in that state. It is likely that he will be born in that state under suitable conditions, for
example with provocation.
§ But if he comes to his senses and realizes the perils of such actions, he can make an effort and
slowly degrade the potency of that kamma seed. The first thing is to stop doing those more
violent acts. If the teenager has enough determination and if he has moral support from his
family, he may be able to get into the moral path.
§ If he makes a determination to change, it will be hard in the beginning. It is like trying to stop a
moving car. If the car has a lot of speed, it takes a bigger effort to stop. It is easier to stop a
slowly moving car, before it gains speed. In the same way, it is easier to revert back if one
realizes that one is on the wrong path early.
9. If the teenager does not change his ways, but only gets involved more and more with the violent
activities, then that kamma seed (or kamma bhava) will grow bigger and can become strong enough
to energize a whole new existence (rebirth) or “uppatti bhava“. Or he can even make a single huge
kamma seed by killing someone.
§ We all are likely to have acquired several or even many such large bad kamma seeds (i.e., many
bad “uppatti bhava“) suitable to yield rebirths in the lowest four realms; we have no way of
finding out.
§ Of course, we are also likely to have many good kamma seeds (i.e., many good “uppatti
bhava“) suitable to yield rebirths in the higher realms.
10. And we do not have any control over which “uppatti bhava” is selected at death. The strongest
with the most “upādāna” associated with it gets to the front automatically. The Buddha gave a simile
to explain how this selection of a “uppatti bhava” or a strong kamma seed happens at the cuti-
paṭisandhi transition at death.
§ Imagine a barn that keeps the cows in for the night. In the morning, all the cows are anxious to
get out and roam around. But when the gate opens, it is the strongest cow that has come to front
and is out of the gate when it is opened. The weaker ones don’t even make an effort to be at the
front.
§ Just like that, it is the strongest “kamma seed” or a “paṭisandhi bhava” that wins at the cuti-
paṭisandhi transition.
§ In the case of the teenager that we discussed above, if the kamma seed that he nourished during
this life as a violent person with “animal-like” behavior is the strongest one of all his
accumulated kamma seeds, then it will bring about an animal existence at the cuti-paṭisandhi
transition.
11. A Buddha could analyze such a paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda cycle in finer details to pin-point
even what type of animal would it be. This is because a Buddha can see not only a person’s whole
history in the present life, but going back to many eons; thus he could see which kamma seed will
bring the next existence and exactly which kind of “gathi” are embedded in that kamma seed. We can
only discuss the general trends, and here we have discussed only the main ideas of how these paṭicca
samuppāda cycles operate.
§ Going back to the teenager, In this case it is the paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda cycle that
operates, and “bhava paccayā jāti” here leads to the birth in a new existence as an animal using
that uppatti bhava.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Paṭicca Samuppāda 931
12. Once born in such an animal existence, that animal will grow and then start the old age (“jarā“),
and eventually die (“marana“).
§ At that death, it is likely that the kammic energy of that kamma seed has not been depleted.
Since most violent animals have shorter lifetimes, only a fraction of that kammic energy is
likely to have been spent and “he” will keep going through many of similar births (“jāti“) until
the energy of that kamma seed is spent. It is said that many animals keep coming back to the
same life many hundreds of times.
13. This is the difference between “bhava” and “jāti“. Once one gets a new existence or “bhava“, one
could have many births (“jāti“) in that existence until the energy of the kamma seed is totally spent.
§ Thus we can see that the last step of “jāti paccayā jara, marana, soka, parideva, dukkha,
domanassa” will be with “him” for a long time to come. It is not just one birth but many that
will correspond to that existence as that animal.
§ For us also, in general, when one is in the human “bhava” one could be reborn many times
before the energy of that “good kamma seed” is depleted. This is why those rebirth memories
can be recalled from adjacent lives. However, it is very difficult to get another “human bhava“;
see, “How the Buddha Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
14. Before closing this section let us discuss another important point. We mentioned earlier that
everyone has accumulated numerous good and bad kamma seeds strong enough to give rise to good
and bad rebirths. Then the question arises: Does a person attain the Sotāpanna stage (i.e., make bad
rebirths in the lowest four realms void) by eliminating all those corresponding bad kamma seeds?
§ While it is possible to reduce the potency of kamma seeds and maybe even eliminate some, it
may not be possible to remove all. Many kamma seeds may be removed by the Ariya metta
bhāvanā discussed in the “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” section, but there could be left overs. It is
said that the Buddha had 11 instances of bad kamma vipāka including a back problem. We will
discuss this point in a separate post.
§ Therefore, it is very likely that we all have many good and bad kamma seeds strong enough to
energize many good and bad rebirths.
§ What happens at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment involves the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step in the
paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda cycle. As we recall, this is the step that is responsible for
energizing “uppatti bhava” as well as “kamma bhava“.
§ But this same step is involved in grasping the strongest “uppatti bhava” at the end of the
current “bhava“. If a person dies and if that was the last possible human birth for him/her, then
at the dying moment, that comes closest and he/she will willingly grasp it because that will
match the dominant “gathi” of him/her.
15. Let us consider the case of the violent teenager again. Suppose he continued with his violent acts
and built up an “uppatti bhava” suitable for a violent animal. Then at the dying moment, he could see
in his mind (like in a dream), a rival gang member trying to “steal a drug deal”; he will also see a gun
closeby. By his natural instincts he will get angry, grab the gun, and shoot that person. This is an
example of a “gathi nimitta“.
§ That is the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step for the new existence. He has willingly grasped the
mindset of an animal, and he will be born as an animal. His next thought moment is in that
animal which comes out of that dead body of the teenager as a “gandhabba” with a fine body
that cannot be seen.
§ This is described in detail in other posts; it needs more background material in “manomaya
kāya” for understanding the technical details, but that is not critical here. However, now we can
get an idea of how a new existence is grasped at the end of a “bhava” in the paṭisandhi paṭicca
samuppāda cycle.
16. Let us now go back to the question of how a Sotāpanna avoids such bad rebirths even if he/she
has many bad kamma seeds. Suppose that Sotāpanna has the same kind of kamma seed as that
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
932 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
teenager (could be from a previous life), and that it is the strong enough to come to forefront of
his/her mind at the dying moment.
§ What happens is that a Sotāpanna will not grab the gun and shoot that person even if it is
his/her worst enemy doing something that could make him/her mad. His/her mindset or “gathi”
have been permanently changed. Thus “upādāna paccayā bhava” step will not be executed for
that kamma seed.
§ In that case now the next potent uppatti bhava will come to the forefront. If that is also a bad
one suitable for rebirth in the lowest four realms, that will be rejected too. Eventually, he/she
will grasp a rebirth that is compatible with his/her “gathi” at that dying moment, which for a
Sotāpanna will never be the “gathi” of a being in one of the four lowest realms. This happens
automatically and very quickly. We do not have conscious control over it.
§ Thus one’s rebirth will determined by the way one lives (and had lived previous lives). If one
lived like an animal, one will be born an animal no matter how much one wishes to have a
“good birth”. The real danger, as we discussed above, is that we do not know how we had lived
our previous lives.
§ This is why paṭicca samuppāda means “pati + ichcha” leading to “sama” + “uppada” or what
one grasps willingly and habitually is what one that will operate automatically at the dying
moment; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
July 6, 2019
§ In the case of the teenager that we discussed in the previous post, “Bhava paccayā Jāti….Jarā ,
Marana,…“, if the kamma seed that he nourished during this life as a violent person with
“animal-like” behavior is the strongest one of all his accumulated kamma seeds, then it will
bring about an animal existence at the cuti-paṭisandhi transition.
4. A Buddha could analyze such a paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda cycle in finer details to pin-point
even what type of animal would it be. This is because a Buddha can see not only a person’s whole
history in the present life, but going back to many eons; thus he could see which kamma seed will
bring the next existence and exactly which kind of “gati” are embedded in that kamma seed. We can
only discuss the general trends, and here we have discussed only the main ideas of how these paṭicca
samuppāda cycles operate.
§ Going back to the teenager, In this case it is the paṭisandhi paṭicca samuppāda cycle that
operates, and “bhava paccayā jāti” here leads to the birth in a new existence as an animal using
that uppatti bhava.
Difference Between Bhava and Jāti
5. Here it is important to realize that cuti-paṭisandhi transition DOES NOT necessarily happen when
a human dies. He/she can be reborn many times as a human within a given “human bhava“; see,
“Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ Once born (jāti) in such an animal existence (bhava), that animal will grow and then start the
old age (“jarā“), and eventually die (“marana“).
§ At that death, it is likely that the kammic energy of that kamma seed has not been depleted.
§ Since most violent animals have shorter lifetimes, only a fraction of that kammic energy is
likely to have been spent and “he” will keep going through many of similar births (“jāti“) until
the energy of that kamma seed is spent. Many animals keep coming back to the same life many
hundreds of times.
6. That is the difference between “bhava” and “jāti“. Once one gets a new existence or “bhava“, one
could have many births (“jāti“) in that existence until the energy of the kamma seed is totally spent. I
keep repeating this, because it is very important to understand the difference between “bhava” and
“jāti“.
§ Thus, we can see that the last step of “jāti paccayā jara, marana, soka, parideva, dukkha,
domanassa” will be with that “teenager” for a long time to come. It is not just one birth but
many that will correspond to that existence as that animal.
§ For us also, in general, when one is in the human “bhava” one could be reborn many times
before the energy of that “good kamma seed” is depleted. This is why those rebirth memories
can be recalled from adjacent lives. A human bhava can last many thousands of years, but each
human birth (jāti) lasts only about 100 years.
§ However, it is very difficult to get another “human bhava“; see, “How the Buddha
Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“.
How Are Certain Rebirths Stopped?
7. We mentioned earlier than everyone has accumulated numerous good and bad kamma seeds strong
enough to give rise to good and bad rebirths. Then the following question arises. Does a person attain
the Sotāpanna stage by eliminating all those corresponding bad kamma seeds?
§ While it is possible to reduce the potency of kamma seeds and maybe even eliminate some, it
may not be possible to remove all. Many kamma seeds may be removed by the Ariya metta
bhavana discussed in the “Bhavana (Meditation)” section, but there could be left overs. Even
the Buddha had 11 instances of bad kamma vipāka including a back problem.
§ Therefore, it is very likely that we all have many good and bad kamma seeds strong enough to
energize many good and bad rebirths.
8. What happens at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment involves the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step in the
uppatti paṭicca samuppāda cycle.
§ Suppose a person dies and that was the last possible human birth for him/her. Then at the dying
moment, that strong kamma seed will generate a corresponding nimitta (or sign of that kamma).
§ Whether he/she will willingly grasp that nimitta will depend on whether he/she still has such
“gati“.
9. Let us again consider the case of the violent teenager discussed in #3 above. Suppose he continued
with his violent acts and built up an “uppatti bhava” suitable for a violent animal. Then, at the dying
moment, he could see in his mind (like in a dream), a rival gang member trying to “steal a drug deal”;
he will also see a gun close-by. This is the nimitta.
§ If that person still has the same gati, then by his natural instincts he will get angry, grab the
gun, and shoot that person.
§ That is the “upādāna paccayā bhava” step for the new existence. He has willingly grasped the
mindset of an animal, and he will be born as an animal. His next thought moment is associated
with that animal which comes out of that dead body as a “gandhabba” (with a fine body that
cannot be seen).
§ This process is explained from the beginning to end in detail in the series of posts, “Paṭicca
Samuppāda in Plain English“.
How Does a Sotāpanna Avoid Bad Rebirths?
10. Let us now go back to the question of how a Sotāpanna avoids such bad rebirths even if he/she
has many bad kamma seeds. Suppose that Sotāpanna has the same kind of strong (and bad) kamma
seed as that teenager (could be from a previous life).
§ What happens is that a Sotāpanna will not grab the gun and shoot that person even if it is
his/her worst enemy. His/her mindset or “gati” have been permanently changed. Thus
“upādāna paccayā bhava” step will not be executed for that kamma seed.
§ In that case now the next potent uppatti bhava will come to the forefront. If that is also a bad
one suitable for rebirth in the lowest four realms, that will be rejected too. Eventually, he/she
will grasp a rebirth that is compatible with his/her “gati” at that dying moment. A Sotāpanna
has removed “gati” of a being in one of the four lowest realms.
§ This happens automatically and very quickly. We do not have any conscious control over
it.
11. Thus one’s rebirth will determined by BOTH the way one lives AND how one had lived previous
lives. One would generate “kamma seeds” or “uppatti bhava” for possible future existences according
to the way one lives a life.
§ However, if one has changed one’s gati PERMANENTLY (via attaining at least the
Sotāpanna stage), then bad bhava EVEN IF one had committed bad kamma
will not result.
suitable to bring in a “bad bhava”, that “bad bhava” will not be grasped at the cuti-paṭisandhi
moment.
§ This is why paṭicca samuppāda means “pati + ichcha” leading to “sama” + “uppāda“. What
one grasps willingly and habitually is what one that will operate automatically at the dying
moment; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ This is why it is better to use Paṭicca Samuppāda rather than using the English translation of
“dependent origination”. Most Pāli word have “built-in” explanations. One just needs to
understand what is meant by those words and just use the Pāli words.
§ I have explained this with saññā, saṅkhāra, and viññāṇa as well; see, “Mental Aggregates“.
Those DO NOT have corresponding SINGLE English words. In particular it is WRONG to
translate viññāṇa as just “consciousness”; see, “Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
Relevance to “Origin of Life” Issue
12. I hope that it is clear now how we create our own future births by doing strong kamma. Good
kamma lead to good vipāka and good births. Bad kamma lead to bad vipāka and bad births.
§ Not only that, but we can avoid bad births (in the lower four realms) by removing our “bad gati
that could lead to such births”. Attainment of Sotāpanna stage ensures this.
§ In the same way, we can stop births in the human and deva realms (remaining realms in kāma
loka). That is done by removing “kāma gati” or cravings for sense pleasures. The need to take
this step may not become clear until one attains the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Even the higher brahma realms have suffering (especially at the moment of death). Future
suffering is completely removed by removing “all gati” including those based on craving for
jhānic pleasures in brahma realms. This happens of course at the Arahant stage.
13. It should be also clear that “new lives” do not randomly come into existence. A new jāti
based on a new bhava arises ONLY as a continuation of an existing lifestream; see, “What
Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ When one bhava ends, a living being automatically grasps a new bhava, if the Arahant stage
has not been attained.
§ That is how the endless rebirth process continues. And that is also why there is no “traceable
beginning to life”.
§ We will discuss this in detail in a new series of posts on “Origin of Life”.
1. “Imasmim sati idam hoti, imassa uppādā idam uppajjati; imasmim asati idam na hoti, imassa
nirodhā idam nirujjhatī ti”. This is a famous phrase that appears in most suttas that describe Paṭicca
Samuppāda (Dependent Origination).
§ It is usually translated as, “When there is this that is, with arising of this that arises; when there
is not this that is not, with cessation of this that ceases”. That sounds like a Zen riddle!
§ But the Buddha never made his Dhamma into riddles. He always presented it in the simplest
possible way. Some verses have become riddles, only because people have incorrectly
translated them; they simply did not understand the true meanings or the significance of key
Pāli words.
§ Another example is, “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
2. The key word in the verse that we are interested is “sati“. All English translations that I have
seen have left out this key word!
§ There are two meanings to the word “sati“. One is the mundane meaning “attention”.
§ It is actually that mundane meaning that should be used in this verse.
3. The deeper meaning of “sati” should be used in the context of Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā, for
example.
§ That “sati” is a sobhana cetasika, i.e., a good mental factor. The sati cetasika is cultivated by
learning dhamma and eventually comprehending Tilakkhaṇa.
§ However, that cetasika sati does not have a counterpart in asobhana cetasika, i.e., there is
no “asati” cetasika.
§ In the verse, both “sati” and “asati” are mentioned. Therefore, “sati” in the context of the
verse does not refer to the sati cetasika.
4. The word “sati” in “Imasmim sati idam hoti,..” is, however, still closely related to the mind. It just
refers to keeping the mind focused on the task at hand, whether it is a “good” or “bad” task.
§ Suppose a suicide bomber is assembling a bomb that he intends to use to kill many people. He
must be paying careful attention to what he is doing and that is the mundane meaning sati
there.
§ In a way, even the term “mindful” can be used to describe the mindset of the suicide bomber
while assembling the bomb. He must be mindful of his task. If he makes even a slight mistake,
he may trigger the bomb right there.
§ Obviously, he is not engaged in Satipaṭṭhāna.
5. That mundane meaning of “attention” is the meaning that should be used in analyzing the verse in
question here: “Imasmim sati idam hōti,..”
§ What it means in this context is, “to focus the mind on something (X)”. Then that
“something” leads to the creation of “another thing (Y)“. Even though X is ALWAYS
mental, Y could be mental (nāma) or material (rūpa) or a combination of the two (nāmarūpa).
§ When the mind is set on getting something done, one makes vacī and kaya saṅkhāra
accordingly, i.e., one thinks about how to get it done and acts accrodingly; that is the “sati” that
is referred to in the verse.
§ When the mind does not focus on something (and does not make plans in the mind via vacī
saṅkhāra, and carries out such plans), that is called “asati“. In that case, there is no reason that
Y would arise.
6. As we will see below, making saṅkhāra is just the first step in a series of steps.
§ The mind can be set on getting done good or bad things. Keeping the attention on “good things”
will lead to good outcomes (via good dhamma). Keeping the attention on “bad things” will lead
to bad outcomes (via bad dhamma).
§ Therefore, in both cases (good or bad attention) will lead to a corresponding (good or bad)
outcome. That is what is meant by “Imasmim sati idam hōti” or “keeping the attention on this
will lead to that”.
§ What the eventual outcome (“that” is a “jāti“, the outcome or the end result) is described by
Paticca Samuppāda: “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāna“,….ending up in “bhava paccayā jāti“.
7. Of course, if one does not keep the attention on something, one will not be generating (good or
bad) saṅkhāra about it. Thus, one will not initiate Paticca Samuppāda cycles: “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāna“,….ending up in “bhava paccayā jāti“.
§ Therefore, if there is “asati” or “no attention on some task”, then there will be no reason for
there to be an outcome: “Imasmim asati idam na hōti“.
§ In other words, the mind will have no reason to generate new saṅkhāra to initiate Paṭicca
Samuppāda processes.
§ The mind can be set on getting done good or bad things. One should do “sati” on good things
and “asati” on bad things. That will lead to ending up with good things and not ending up with
bad things.
8. Now we can understand half of the verse: “Imasmim sati idam hoti, “Imasmim asati idam na
hoti“. That means “when the mind is focused on X that will give rise to Y, when the mind is not
focused on X that will not give rise to Y”.
§ Next, we need to figure out what is meant by “imassa uppādā idam uppajjati” and “imassa
nirodhā idam nirujjhatī “.
§ This part states that what has ultimately come to being (uppajjati) is due to what first arose
in the mind (uppādā), AND for something not to come to being (nirujjhatī), the
corresponding cause should not arise in the mind (nirodhā).
§ So, now we can translate the whole verse: “when the mind is focused on this it will give rise to
that, when the mind is not focused on this it will not give rise to that; this arising in the mind
(uppādā) will give rise to that (uppajjati), this not arising in the mind (nirodhā) will stop that
from coming to being (nirujjhatī)”.
§ In very simple terms, this describes the key message of the Buddha: if one does not generate
any defilements in the mind, then one will not be reborn into this suffering-filled world.
9. So, now we can translate the whole verse: “when the mind is focused on this it will give rise to
that, when the mind is not focused on this it will not give rise to that; this arising in the mind
(uppādā) will give rise to that (uppajjati), this not arising in the mind (nirōdhā) will stop that from
coming to being (nirujjhatī)”.
§ In very simple terms, this describes the key message of the Buddha: if one does not generate
any defilements in the mind, then one will not be reborn into this suffering-filled world.
10. How anything and everything in this world arises with the mind as the “creator” is explained in
the doctrine of cause of effect or paṭicca samuppāda.
§ Even though the process starts off with generating saṅkhāra (“avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“), it
involves many other steps (“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa”, etc) before the final thing manifests.
§ That is why this verse comes in many suttas just before introducing the paṭicca samuppāda
cycle starting with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra“.
11. What we discussed above becomes clear in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Ariyasāvaka Sutta (SN
12.49)“. It starts with the statement: “Na, bhikkhave, sutavato ariyasāvakassa evaṃ hoti: ‘kiṃ nu kho
— kismiṃ sati kiṃ hoti, kissuppādā kiṃ uppajjati? Kismiṃ sati saṅkhārā honti, kismiṃ sati viññāṇaṃ
hoti, kismiṃ sati nāmarūpaṃ hoti, kismiṃ sati saḷāyatanaṃ hoti, kismiṃ sati phasso hoti, kismiṃ sati
vedanā hoti, kismiṃ sati taṇhā hoti, kismiṃ sati upādānaṃ hoti, kismiṃ sati bhavo hoti, kismiṃ sati
jāti hoti, kismiṃ sati jarāmaraṇaṃ hotī’ti?”.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, a noble disciple is not confused by the question: ‘[What gives you indeed—
(kiṃ nu kho—)] What in the mind becomes a cause? With the existence of what in the mind does
what come to being? What in the mind becomes a cause for saṅkhāra? What in the mind becomes a
cause for viññāṇa? What in the mind becomes a cause for nāmarūpa?… What in the mind becomes a
cause for jarāmaraṇa?’ ”.
12. The next verse: “Atha kho, bhikkhave, sutavato ariyasāvakassa aparappaccayā ñāṇamevettha
hoti: ‘imasmiṃ sati idaṃ hoti, imassuppādā idaṃ uppajjati. Avijjāya sati saṅkhārā honti; saṅkhāresu
sati viññāṇaṃ hoti; viññāṇe sati nāmarūpaṃ hoti; nāmarūpe sati saḷāyatanaṃ hoti; saḷāyatane sati
phasso hoti; phasse sati vedanā hoti; vedanāya sati taṇhā hoti; taṇhāya sati upādānaṃ hoti; upādāne
sati bhavo hoti; bhave sati jāti hoti; jātiyā sati jarāmaraṇaṃ hotī’ti. So evaṃ pajānāti: ‘evamayaṃ
loko samudayatī’ti“.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, the noble disciple knows that what arises is dependent on what is cultivated
in the mind: ‘When this exists in the mind, that comes to be; with the arising of this in the mind, that
arises. When there is ignorance in the mind (avijjāya sati), saṅkhāra come to be (saṅkhārā honti).
When there are saṅkhāra in the mind (saṅkhāresu sati), viññāṇa comes to be (viññāṇaṃ hoti). When
there is viññāṇa in the mind (viññāṇe sati), nāmarūpa come to be (nāmarūpaṃ honti), ….When there
is bhava in the mind (bhave sati), jāti comes to be (jāti hoti). When there is jāti in the mind (jātiyā
sati), jarāmaraṇa comes to be (jarāmaraṇaṃ hotī). He understands thus: ‘In such a way the world
arises (samudaya). ’”
13. Next verse is: “Na, bhikkhave, sutavato ariyasāvakassa evaṃ hoti: ‘kiṃ nu kho—kismiṃ asati kiṃ
na hoti, kissa nirodhā kiṃ nirujjhati? Kismiṃ asati saṅkhārā na honti, kismiṃ asati viññāṇaṃ na
hoti, kismiṃ asati nāmarūpaṃ na hoti, kismiṃ asati saḷāyatanaṃ na hoti, kismiṃ asati phasso na
hoti, kismiṃ asati vedanā na hoti, kismiṃ asati taṇhā na hoti, kismiṃ asati upādānaṃ na hoti, kismiṃ
asati bhavo na hoti, kismiṃ asati jāti na hoti, kismiṃ asati jarāmaraṇaṃ na hotī’ti?”.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, a noble disciple is not confused by the question: ‘[What gives you indeed—
(kiṃ nu kho—)]Absence of what in the mind would not be a cause? With the cessation of what in the
mind what would be stopped from arising? Absence of what in the mind (kismiṃ asati) saṅkhāra
would not result (na honti)? Absence of what in the mind viññāṇa would not result? ..Absence of
what in the mind nāmarūpa would not result?… Absence of what in the mind jarāmaraṇa would not
result?’ ”.
14. And then: “Atha kho, bhikkhave, sutavato ariyasāvakassa aparappaccayā ñāṇamevettha hoti:
‘imasmiṃ asati idaṃ na hoti, imassa nirodhā idaṃ nirujjhati. Avijjāya asati saṅkhārā na honti;
saṅkhāresu asati viññāṇaṃ na hoti; viññāṇe asati nāmarūpaṃ na hoti; nāmarūpe asati saḷāyatanaṃ
na hoti … pe … bhavo na hoti … jāti na hoti … jātiyā asati jarāmaraṇaṃ na hotī’ti. So evaṃ
pajānāti: ‘evamayaṃ loko nirujjhatī’ti.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, the noble disciple knows that what arises is dependent on what is cultivated
in the mind: ‘When this does not exist in the mind, that would not come to be; with the cessation of
this in the mind, that is stopped from arising. When there is no ignorance in the mind (avijjāya asati),
saṅkhāra do not come to be (saṅkhārā na honti). When saṅkhāra cease to exist in the mind
(saṅkhāresu asati), viññāṇa do not come to be (viññāṇaṃ na hoti). With the cessation of viññāṇa in
the mind (viññāṇe asati), nāmarūpa do not come to be (nāmarūpaṃ na honti), ….When there is
bhava absent in the mind (bhave asati), jāti would not come to be (jāti na hoti). When there is no jāti
in the mind (jātiyā asati), jarāmaraṇa do not come to be (jarāmaraṇaṃ na hotī). He understands
thus: ‘In such a way the world ceases to exist (nirujjhatī), and thus the samsāric suffering ends.’ ”
15. Finally, “Yato kho, bhikkhave, ariyasāvako evaṃ lokassa samudayañca atthaṅgamañca
yathābhūtaṃ pajānāti, ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, ariyasāvako diṭṭhisampanno itipi … pe …
amatadvāraṃ āhacca tiṭṭhati itipī”ti.
Translated: “Bhikkhus, a noble disciple thus understands the origin and the ending of the world. He
is knowledgeable about the true nature of this world, has the correct vision, and comes to attain
Nibbāna“.
16. That is the complete sutta. It provides the basic reasoning behind paṭicca samuppāda.
§ It is important to realize that all the steps in paṭicca samuppāda involves the mind, up to the jāti
stage. When the jāti stage is arrives, the process is complete. That jāti which came into being,
has to evolve naturally to its end.
October 22, 2016; revised October 25, 2016; June 15, 2018
1. Paṭṭhāna Dhammā is also cited as pattāna Dhammā in English. However, the correct word should
be pattana, since it is pronounced “pattāna”; there is no “th” sound.
§ The word “pattāna” comes from “patta” + “āna”. I have previously mentioned that “āna” means
“bringing in” as in “ānāpāna” in Ānāpāna bhāvanā. “Patta” in Pāli or Sinhala means the layer
of a tree trunk underneath the outermost layer or bark — consisting of phloem cells — which
carry food between roots and leaves. (The outer layer or bark is called “potta” in Sinhala).
§ So, the word “paṭṭhāna” here conveys the idea that while the roots (mūlika hethu) are critical
for the tree’s survival, the “patta” also plays an important role for the tree’s growth. In the case
of Paṭṭhāna Dhammā, they play an important role of describing the conditions under which
hetu or causes can bring in effects, as we will see below.
§ By the way, the “patta” are essential for the tree’s survival, just as the roots of the tree are. One
could kill a tree simply by a process called “girdling” where those phloem cells are removed;
see the Wikipedia article: “WebLink: WIKI: Girdling“.
§ The Buddha frequently used analogies with the workings of a tree. We also need to remember
that “mūla” is a root in Pāli or Sinhala, so that “mülika hethu” means “root causes”. So, the
tree’s survival depends on not only its roots, but also its “patta” containing those
critical phloem cells.
§ This is the same as saying Paṭṭhāna Dhammā describing CONDITIONS are as important as
ROOT CAUSES, which are lobha, dosa, and, moha (for akusala kamma), and alobha, adosa,
and amoha (for kusala kamma).
2. It is also to be noted that “paṭṭhāna” in “satipaṭṭhāna” can be interpreted to mean “providing food”
or “patta” +”āna” to cultivate sati or mindfulness. Furthermore, “satipaṭṭhāna” is pronounced like
that too, without “th” sound at the end.
§ However, “satipaṭṭhāna” with a “h” is the common way it is spelled in English. So, I decided to
go with that when I wrote the posts on the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta in the “Sutta Interpretations”
section. The meaning given there is also compatible, regardless of how it is spelled.
§ The word “paṭṭhāna dhammā” has not been discussed that much in English. Therefore, it is
good to get started the right way. Buddhaghosa did not discuss it because he did not
comprehend paṭicca samuppāda, and as a result even many people who follow even Theravāda
Buddhism are not familiar with paṭṭhāna dhammā. Ven. Ledi Sayadaw in Burma and Ven.
Rerukane Chandawimala in Sri Lanka are clear exceptions. They have discussed paṭṭhāna
dhammā; see the references below.
§ However, their interpretations of Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta) are not correct.
3. In the workings of living things (including plants) — and in mental processes in particular — the
mechanism of how causes lead to effects is much more complex compared to material phenomena
involving inert objects.
§ In these cases, many conditions need to be satisfied, in addition to having sufficient causes.
§ In many cases, such critical conditions are not satisfied long after the causes were generated, so
there is normally a TIME DELAY between causes and effects, i.e., between kamma and kamma
vipāka.
§ This is why it is hard for people to see the validity of cause and effect (hethu phala) involving
living things and especially the mind.
§ This is what is explained in paṭicca samuppāda, with the help of paṭṭhāna dhammā.
§ Let us discuss some examples to understand the role of conditions or paccayā.
4. All necessary causes to bring about a tree are embedded in a seed. A seed is the CAUSE for
subsequent appearance of a tree. Yet, a seed cannot germinate unless suitable conditions are
present. If one keeps a seed in a cool dry place, it will just sit there for even thousands of years
without giving rise to a tree.
§ However, if one plants the seed in the ground where sunlight is available and provides water
and nutrients, it will germinate and grow to be a tree.
§ The root condition to bring into existence a tree is embedded in a seed; this is called anantara
paccaya. But suitable conditions for that seed to germinate are in fertile soil with adequate
sunlight and water; this is called samanantara paccaya. Therefore, both anantara AND
samanantara paccaya MUST be satisfied to bring a tree to existence; see, “Anantara and
Samanantara Paccaya” for details.
§ So, AT WHAT TIME the seed will germinate, will depend on at what time the samanantara
condition (fertile soil) will be satisfied. Anantara condition (presence a seed) is not enough.
5. Another important condition of paccaya comes into play for the germinated seed to grow into a
tree: The āhāra paccaya (food condition) must be satisfied. If water, sunlight, and nutrients are not
available after the seed is germinated, it cannot grow to be a tree.
§ A very important type of āhāra is the “food for viññāṇa“. When one is having bad thoughts
about another person, that viññāṇa grows as long as one keeps thinking about that person and
how bad he/she is. Viññāṇa āhāra are mano sancetana.
6. Another example of such a condition or paccaya is “āsevana paccaya”. Asevana means to
“associate with”.
§ An important example is the association with bad friends. Whether it is a child or an adult,
one’s behavior will be influenced by who one associates with; see, “The Law of Attraction,
Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“.
§ I have discussed several such important conditions or paccaya in the post, “Micchā Diṭṭhi –
Connection to Hethu Phala (Cause and Effect)“. Here is that discourse:
WebLink: Audio Desana: Episode 6 - Micchā Diṭṭhi Connection to Hethu Phala Cause and
Effect
There are 24 such conditions in Paṭṭhāna Dhammā. I will discuss them in detail in this
subsection on “Paṭṭhāna Dhammā” in a series of posts.
§ This is why mental phenomena are so complex. In many cases, a number of such conditions
need to be satisfied for a cause (hethu) to lead to a corresponding effect (phala).
7. In the same way, the kammic energies created by our actions do not disappear. A given
action creates a kamma seed with energy to bring in its fruits. It is just like a seed waiting for right
conditions to germinate and to bring in a tree to existence.
§ Those kamma seeds or kamma beeja are out there waiting for suitable conditions to bring in
their effect.
§ Whether they will bring vipāka, AND at what strength, AND when, will depend on the
conditions or paccaya. This is what is described by paṭicca samuppāda with the help of
paṭṭhāna dhammā.
§ See, “What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?”, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma
Beeja, Kamma Vipāka” and “Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Thalaya (Mind
Plane)” for more details.
8. But there are some strong kamma that WILL bring in vipāka without exceptions. Those
include anantariya pāpa kamma. They are so strong that they do not require conditions to be just
right. They bring vipāka mostly at the dying moment, i.e., death of the physical body, and will not be
delayed until the cuti-paṭisandhi moment; so the delay is only until death.
§ Some people inherit wealth unexpectedly and some people die of accidents. These are also
strong kamma vipāka, though as not strong as anantariya pāpa kamma.
§ But in most cases, conditions or paccaya play major roles, sometimes many conditions need to
be satisfied for vipāka to bear fruit.
9. This knowledge — or rather this understanding of — how kamma and kamma vipāka work — is
called kammassakatā sammā diṭṭhi (is also the right view of kamma as one’s property), and is a
REQUIREMENT to attain mundane sammā samādhi. When one fully understands this, it will be
easier to see that rebirth process has a logical foundation.
§ This is because one can now clearly see that most of kamma or one’s actions are going to have
corresponding vipāka or results when suitable CONDITIONS appear.
§ So, if one does actions suitable to be born in the apāyas, one COULD BE born in the apāyas,
until one REMOVES the ability to for such CONDITIONS to appear.
§ When one attains the Sotāpanna stage, the conditions suitable for a birth in the apāyas will
never be realized. This requires another step BEYOND kammassakatā sammā diṭṭhi, which is
the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Therefore, getting to the Sotāpanna stage is a two-step process: first to get to kammassakatā
sammā diṭṭhi and then the comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa.
§ This is discussed in detail in the desanā in #6 above.
10. We see people doing immoral things without them being subjected to corresponding punishments,
but that does not mean they are getting away with it. Those actions can bring their fruits in future
lives if they are not realized in this life.
§ There are two ways to overcome kamma vipāka. The first is: those kamma seeds will lose their
energy with time; they can last at most 91 eons. They are like regular seeds, which lose their
power over time.
§ The other way is to attain all four stages of Nibbāna and remove the possibility of making
conditions for ANY kamma seed to germinate.
11. These conditions or paccaya, play a critical role in paṭicca samuppāda. When we say “avijjā
paccayā saṅkhāra“, it means, “we do saṅkhāra with ignorance when necessary CONDITIONS are
present”.
§ For example, we do not do immoral acts or apuññabhi saṅkhāra all the time. When we are
attracted to, or repulsed by something that we see (this is an example of arammana paccaya),
we may generate craving or dislike, and then it can lead to an immoral actions or apuññabhi
saṅkhāra; see, “What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?“.
§ This is the reason why kamma itself is not deterministic. Just because one has avijjā does not
mean one will necessarily do an immoral thing, generating (apuññabhi) saṅkhāra. If we
cultivate Satipaṭṭhāna, even if we get the urge to do something immoral, we can contemplate on
the bad consequences and stop that action, speech, or thoughts.
§ When one keeps doing Satipaṭṭhāna — and keep avoiding immoral acts — one’s gathi will
change for the better, and then even the automatic urge to do something immoral will gradually
fade. In other words, one’s avijjā will reduce. This is why Satipaṭṭhāna is so important.
References
Before we start discussing the various forms of Paṭicca Samuppāda (PS), it is essential to be clear
about what is meant by “paccayā” (pronounced “pachchayā”). Paṭṭhāna Dhamma provides a
complete description. We will introduce the concept here.
Introduction
1. The PS cycle starts as: “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra, saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa, viññāṇa paccayā
nāmarūpa, nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana,….”.
§ And since PS describes the “cause and effect” in Buddha Dhamma, most people think “avijjā
paccayā saṅkhāra” means “avijjā causes saṅkhāra” or “ignorance causes one to acts that
generate bad kamma.”
§ Even an ordinary person has avijjā, he/she will not ALWAYS act accordingly; most of the
time, people act appropriately or morally. However, as long as avijjā is there, at times one
WILL likely act with avijjā and do inappropriate or immoral things.
§ Similarly, many people think that “saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” means “saṅkhāra causes
viññāṇa” or “bad kamma lead to corresponding consciousness”, and so on down the whole PS
cycle.
§ As we discuss below, the steps should be translated as, “with avijjā (ignorance) as condition,
saṅkhāra arise”, “with saṅkhāra as condition viññāṇa, etc.
Key Role Of Conditions
2. It will clarify a lot of things down the line if one understood that PS does not refer to a “direct link”
between causes and effects. Just because we have done many good/bad kamma (generated via
saṅkhāra) DOES NOT mean they ALL lead to kamma vipāka.
§ That was pointed out in item #5 in the previous post “Paṭicca Samuppāda – Overview”. But in
case the point was missed, I wanted to emphasize the point in this post.
§ Any effect must have a cause. But there can be possible causes without leading to any results.
Otherwise, Nibbāna would not be possible. That needs some contemplation, and I will give
some examples below.
§ However, without suitable CONDITIONS, causes (kamma) cannot automatically bring results
(vipāka).
3. The easiest way is to consider the following example: A seed contains necessary causes
(ingredients) for bringing up a new tree. But just because a seed is there, a tree is not going to come
to existence. If the seed is in a cool, dry place, one could keep it that way for a long time. Or one
could burn or crush it, and it will not bring up a tree.
§ SUITABLE CONDITIONS must be present for causes to bring about corresponding effects.
That is what paccayā means.
§ When such suitable conditions are present, causes WILL bring about corresponding effects.
Thus when some effect is brought about, it is called “paccuppanna”, i.e., born (“uppanna”) via
suitable conditions (“paccayā”); of course, if the root causes must be there, to begin with).
§ In the above example, the seed could germinate and grow to a tree if one plants that seed
(cause) in the ground and provides water, nutrients, and sunlight (suitable conditions).
Not All Kamma Lead to Kamma Vipāka
4. When causes are there, corresponding effects (results) are LIKELY if suitable conditions for the
effects of taking place. That is why kamma is not deterministic; see, “What is Kamma? – Is
Everything Determined by Kamma?.”
§ However, the critical point in PS is that the effect – IF AND WHEN IT HAPPENS – is in
accordance with the cause, and also the CONDITIONS was one’s choosing: “Pati ichcha”
leads to “sama uppāda” or simply: “when one gets attached, that leads to a new birth of similar
characteristics”. If and when the causes bring forth the consequences, they will be of the
similar nature.
5. It is not necessary to get into further details unless one is interested in “digging deeper”, but there
are 24 “paccayā” or “conditions” that can actually cause the effect to materialize; these are “Paṭṭhāna
Dhamma“).
§ Let us briefly discuss three such paccayā, “hetu paccayā”, “anantara samanantara paccayā”,
and “aññamañña paccayā” to see what happens.
Three Important Conditions (Paccayā)
6. Nothing happens without a root cause or a hetu (pronounced “hãthu”; see the pronunciation key in
“Pāli Glossary (A-K) and Pāli Glossary (L-Z)”).
§ For example, a bomb causes damage because of the explosives in it; but someone has to trigger
it to go off. If the bomb sits somewhere for a long time, its propellants may degrade, and then
the “cause” may disappear; most kamma seeds are like that too.
§ Thus, without the root cause, there will not be an explosion. That is “hetu paccayā.”
7. My favorite example of the “anantara samanantara paccayā” is the germination of a seed that I
discussed above in #3. Just because there is an apple seed, it will not cause an apple tree to appear.
§ An apple seed will stay without germinating for many years in a cool, dry place. But if planted
in the ground with water and sunlight present, it will sprout and give rise to an apple tree; see,
“Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya” for details.
§ Of course, just like with the bomb, if the apple seed sits there for too long, it may lose its
potency and may not yield an apple tree at all. Thus the hetu paccayā must always be satisfied.
8. The third one, “aññamañña paccayā,” means dependent on each other: For example, viññāṇa and
nāmarūpa depend on each other:
§ It usually is stated that “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” or “depending on the viññāṇa, nāmarūpa
arise.” For example, viññāṇa of the cuti citta at the moment of death causes a matching
nāmarūpa to rise in the next birth: a hateful thought could lead to birth in the niraya or the
animal realm.
§ However, viññāṇa in turn, depends on the type of nāmarūpa: with the nāmarūpa of an animal,
it is not possible to get into jhāna. Only certain types of nāmarūpa can “support” certain types
of viññāṇa.
§ Depending on the situations one or more of 24 paccayā (or conditions) can simultaneously
come into play. We will discuss this in future posts.
Paṭṭhāna Dhamma
9. I just wanted to give a brief introduction to the complex “Paṭṭhāna Dhamma” which describes 24
such “paccayā” involved in Paṭicca Samuppāda. In other words, cause(s) and effect(s) have
complicated relationships. We can only discern significant relationships. Only a Buddha can sort out
all such complexities.
§ But there is no need to analyze everything in great detail to understand the message of the
Buddha. One can become a Sotāpanna just by comprehending the Tilakkhaṇa: anicca, dukkha,
anatta.
10. So why am I also providing information on these complex topics? It is for three reasons:
§ First, it helps build saddhā (faith) in Buddha Dhamma. Anyone who takes time to examine
these concepts can see that it provides a COMPLETE explanation for everything that we
experience and more.
§ Secondly, it is intellectually satisfying to see how all pieces nicely fit into the “big picture”: I
hope I have been able to give the sense of joy that I have experienced in “seeing how these
pieces fall into place.”
§ Finally, this “self-consistency” is critical in the process of sorting out which version of Buddha
Dhamma is the correct one. As the Buddha himself pointed out, any version that is not self-
consistent should be discarded; see, “Saddharma Pundarika Sutra (Lotus Sutra) – A Focused
Analysis.”
Next in the series, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya”, ..
8.8.3 Anantara and Samanantara Paccayā
1. These are two important “paccayā” or relations in Buddha Dhamma. Anything in this world
happens due to a reason (hetu, pronounced “hethu”). But just because there is a hetu (cause), the
appropriate result (or the effect) may not occur until suitable conditions are realized.
2. This is the reason why kamma is not deterministic. In the post, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything
Determined by Kamma?”, I stated this fact and here we will see the reason for it.
§ When we commit a good or a bad deed, the kammic potential or energy associated with that
deed is deposited in a kamma beeja or a kamma seed. We will eventually get to the question of
“where it is stored”, but we just need to keep in mind that a kamma seed is not a physical seed,
but is an energy or a potential. This concept is described in the post, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma,
Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka”.
§ The germination of a kamma seed, though, has some similarities to the germination of a
physical seed, for example, an apple seed. The apple seed has the potential to bring about an
apple tree, but the seed will not germinate until suitable conditions for germination are realized:
the seed needs to be in soil, and water and sunlight are also needed to be provided for
germination to take place.
§ In the same way, kamma vipāka (result of a past kamma) can come to fruition only when right
conditions for the corresponding kamma seed to germinate are realized.
3. Let us look at the anantara and samanantara relations as discussed in the Paṭṭhāna Dhamma
(book on “Conditional Relations” in Abhidhamma):
§ “An” means food or in this case the kamma seed; “antara” means in storage, waiting to bear
fruit.
§ Thus, anantara means basically a kamma seed waiting to be germinated.
§ “Sama” means equal or similar. Thus samanantara (“sama” + “anantara“) means “matching
conditions” with the anantara.
§ Therefore, anantara and samanantara go together. There must be an anantara (basically a
cause or an stored energy in a seed) for a samanantara to be effective. On the other hand, if
samanantara (right conditions for that cause to take effect or for the seed to germinate) is not
there, a kamma seed at anantara cannot bear fruit.
§ By the way, ānantara (as in ānantariya kamma) means something entirely different; see,
“Ānantariya Kamma – Connection to Gandhabba“.
4. Here is one example the Buddha gave: If one prepares a plot by preparing the soil, providing water,
and if sunlight is also available, the samanantara for a seed to germinate is there. However, unless
one starts off with an apple seed (anantara condition not met), an apple tree will not grow.
§ On the other hand, if one keeps the apple seed in a cool, dry place, it will not germinate, i.e., the
samanantara condition is not met.
§ When both anantara and samanantara conditions are met, i.e., when one plants an apple seed
in a suitable plot, it will germinate and become an apple tree.
§ However, when an apple seed is planted a mango tree will not result from that, but only an
apple tree: thus samanantara will give rise to an effect that matches the “seed” that was in
anantara.
5. More examples can be given these days that are related to modern technology. If a radio station is
broadcasting a radio program, that can be taken as the anantara: the seed energy is available
anywhere within a certain range. But one cannot listen to the program without a radio; even if
someone has a radio, one cannot listen to the program unless the radio is “tuned’ to the correct
frequency. When those conditions are met, one could hear the program even many miles away. The
delay between the broadcast and reception is a very short time.
§ Kamma vipāka can be thought of bringing fruit via “instant communication” when the
conditions become right. All kammic potentials are in “instant contact” with us via a concept
similar to that described in quantum entanglement: see, “Quantum Entanglement – We Are All
Connected”. Thus all potential kamma seeds are waiting in anantara and can bring about
instant results when right conditions (samanantara) appear.
6. By being mindful, we can avoid many past bad kamma seeds from coming to fruition. We just
make sure that samanantara conditions are not present. If one goes out at night in a bad
neighborhood that is providing fertile ground for a past bad kamma seed to germinate and the kamma
vipāka to take place.
§ In the same way, we can force good kamma seeds to germinate by providing the right
conditions. For example, even if we have enough merits (a good kamma seeds) that could make
us pass a test or get a job, unless we make right conditions (i.e., prepare in advance), we may
not get the results.
§ But sometimes one gets an unexpected promotion or get better results than anticipated in a test
if the kamma seeds are strong.
7. From our past innumerable lives we have accumulated innumerable kamma seeds both good and
bad. Some of the stronger ones bear fruit no matter what we do, especially the ānantariya kamma
vipāka.
§ But in general, by being mindful (i.e., by NOT providing appropriate conditions), we can avoid
many bad kamma vipāka; by making right preparations (i.e., by optimizing samanantara
conditions), we can exploit those good kamma seeds.
§ A particularly important case is the bringing up a child. The parents and teachers have a huge
responsibility for providing right conditions for that young mind to develop. In particular,
association with bad friends can direct a young life in the wrong direction; in the same way,
association with good friends, a nurturing environment, can bring about a productive,
responsible adult.
8. One important cross-connection is matching “gathi” with similar “gathi” that we have discussed
before; see, “Habits and Goals”, and “Sansāric Habits and Āsavas”.
§ For example, when a gandhabba is waiting for a suitable womb, the anantara-samanantara
paccayā come into play. A gandhabba, who in the previous lives had developed a certain habit,
say heavy drinking, is attracted to a womb of a woman with similar habits, possibly an
alcoholic or a drug user. The concept of a gandhabba is described in, “Manomaya Kāya and
Physical Body“, and “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“.
§ Similarly, a gandhabba, who in previous lives led moral lives, is bound to be attracted to a
womb of the mother in a moral family. Just like in the above case, here also the samanantara
for the gandhabba (where it can establish itself) is an environment that matches its own
“gathi“.
§ However, no matter how one is born, one can still change one’s own destiny by making
conditions for other good kamma vipāka to come to fruition and also by making sure not to
make conditions for bad kamma vipāka to come to fruition.
In other posts we will discuss further applications of anantara-samanantara relations. One important
application is in, “Transfer of Merits (Pattidana)- How does it Happen?“.
Next, “Difference Between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra“, ……….
8.8.4 Āsevana and Aññamañña Paccayā
November 20, 2016; revised July 1, 2019 (comment added at the end)
1. As mentioned in the “Paṭṭhāna Dhammā – Connection to Cause and Effect (Hetu Phala)“, there are
24 paccayā or conditions that contribute to various steps in the Paṭicca Samuppāda (PS) cycles.
§ As we have discussed in the post “What Does “Paccaya” Mean in Paṭicca Samuppāda?” and in
the above mentioned post, a given step in a PS cycle cannot proceed until one or more
conditions are satisfied. And we have control over most of these conditions. Therein lies the
value of Paṭṭhāna Dhammā; we can see how to stop akusala-mūla PS cycles from proceeding,
and to maintain kusala-mūla PS cycles.
§ In this post we will discuss two of those 24 paccayā or conditions. They are somewhat related
to each other and thus are suitable to be discussed together.
2. Āsevana paccayā — which can be loosely translated as the “condition of association” — is
an important condition that fuels various steps in PS at different times.
§ I see that in most cases, āsevana paccayā has been translated as “condition of repetition”. Even
though repetition is relevant, repetition comes via close associations, so association is primary.
§ The word “āsevana” comes from “ā” and “sevana” or “came to the shade”; when one is staying
close to a tree in the hot sun, one is “hanging around” the tree and is benefited from its cool
shade.
§ Of course, when one is associating bad friends, one can be influenced in the wrong direction
too, as we will see below. Therefore, āsevana paccayā comes into play in both kusala-mūla and
akusala-mūla PS.
§ When one likes the experience, one tends to keep that association. Sometimes that eventually
leads to bad consequences, but because of the ignorance of such bad outcomes, one still tends
to keep bad associations.
3. An important role of āsevana paccayā is played in the “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” step in PS,
whether it is kusala-mūla PS or akusala-mūla PS.
§ For example, a teenager who is (unknowingly) cultivating a viññāṇa for drinking is heavily
influenced by the association with bad friends. He likes to “hang out” with such bad friends and
tends to generate a lot of sankalapanā or vacī saṅkhāra (conscious thinking about how he/she
will be having a good time with those friends in parties with lot of alcohol). The nāmarūpa
generated in his mind are such “party scenes”, visualizing those friends as well as various
favorite drinks.
§ On the other hand, when one is on the right path, one is constantly thinking about Dhamma
Concepts, having Dhamma discussions with good friends, and visualizing such gatherings. Or
one could be visualizing some meritorious deeds, like giving or helping out at an orphanage;
these are good nāmarūpa generated with such a good viññāṇa.
§ These nāmarūpa are different from the nāmarūpa that descends to a womb at the okkanti
moment, i.e., when a gandhabba enters a womb. We will discuss that later. So, nāmarūpa come
in two main categories.
4. Āsevana paccayā can play a role under different types of situations. Let us consider two such
examples.
§ One such situation is the teenager mentioned above, who cultivates bad nāmarūpa by
associating with bad friends. The more he/she associates with such bad friends, the more he/she
will be generating bad nāmarūpa of party scenes with lot of alcohol and/or drugs. Not only that,
there will be other associated nāmarūpa: He/she will be constantly visualizing favorite friends,
gathering places, appropriate music, etc. too.
§ In such an environment, it is also easy to cultivate other types of “bad nāmarūpa” such as
gambling, illicit sex, stealing (to sustain those activities), violence and even killings.
§ Such nāmarūpa and more could be cultivated by the teenager over time.
5. On the other hand, when one is on either mundane or lokuttara Eightfold Path, one will be
cultivating “good viññāṇa” and one tends to visualize exactly opposite types nāmarūpa.
§ One could be planning a Dhamma discussion and could be thinking and visualizing who will be
there and what kind of topics will be discussed. One could be organizing a charity event and
making arrangements.
§ One could be planning to attend a meditation retreat and visualizing what kind of activities one
could be engaging in. One could be even thinking about and trying to visualize the suffering
endured by poor children in a situation one is familiar with and generating compassion-filled
thoughts and nāmarūpa.
6. In either case, “nāmarūpa paccayā saḷāyatana” step will then point one’s all six āyatana or
saḷāyatana (five physical senses and the mind) towards such thoughts, visuals, and actions.
§ Then those associations will become even stronger. When one gets totally absorbed in relevant
activities, when one’s mind is occupied with such thoughts, and when one is constantly
visualizing related activities, people, and objects, those nāmarūpa will “grow” in one’s mind.
Those nāmarūpa will be closely associated with one’s gathi.
§ This is also discussed in the post: “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character (Gathi), and
Cravings (Āsavas)“.
7. Another important application of the asevana paccayā occurs in a citta vīthi itself. When we are
generating sankalapana (or sankappa), we are generating an enormous number of citta vīthi in a short
time. Each citta vīthi will make the next citta vīthi stronger (actually make the javana citta in the
subsequent citta vīthi stronger) by association.
§ The best example is one we have talked about several times in the “Living Dhamma” section.
When we start thinking about an enemy, we start visualizing more and more bad situations that
we encountered with that person; we tend to pull out all “past associations” from memory, as
well as conjure up “many possible future scenarios” in our minds.
§ All these “bad sankalpana” or “conscious bad thoughts” will strengthen the PS steps.
§ Our minds can run wild if not controlled with Satipaṭṭhāna or Ānāpāna; see, “Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta – Relevance to Suffering in This Life“.
8. Even in a given citta vīthi, each javana citta is strengthened by the previous javana citta, via
asevana paccayā. this happens in the time scale of billionth of a second and is driven by our gathi.
§ The first javana citta is weak. But the second javana citta gets fuel from the first one, and is
inevitably generating strength via association. One meaning of the name javana is “to run
with”. The series of 7 javanas “run with the object in mind”, initially getting stronger until the
fifth javana. Then the fuel runs out and the sixth and seventh javana become weaker and
weaker.
§ Kamma generated by the first javana citta can only bring vipāka in this life. But kamma done
by the second through the sixth javana citta (which get stronger by association), are potent
enough to bring kamma vipāka in many future lives. When the javana get weaker, the seventh
javana can bring vipāka only in the next life, and will become null if it did not bring vipāka in
the next life.
§ It is not necessary to learn the complexities of citta vīthi, but it is good to have some idea.
9. The association then moves to the next citta vīthi. Thus the subsequent citta vīthi (and thus the
javana citta in that citta vīthi) will be stronger. And thus it propagates and this is why one can get
“really worked up” even thinking about a hated person.
§ This is why Satipaṭṭhāna (and being mindful of bad thoughts) is so important. The start of such
a hateful mindset is AUTOMATIC (and is due to our gathi) as discussed in the “Living
Dhamma” section. But we have the ability to stop those initial thoughts BEFORE they get
strong and become out of control.
§ This can be compared to a seed giving rise to a mighty tree, unless one destroys it when it is
just a little bud. When a seed germinates and becomes visible as a little plant, it can be easily
broken. But if one waits and allows it to grow, it COULD grow to be a strong tree that is hard
to take down.
10. As we can see, paṭṭhāna dhammā can go to very fine details. This is why paṭicca samuppāda has
been compared to an ocean. It is vast, and can explain the arising of ANY SANKATA (whether live or
inert) in this world.
§ However, if we start digging deeper, that could become a waste of time since there is no ending
as to how much finer detail one wants to examine.
§ Still, it is good to see the depth of Buddha Dhamma. It gives one confidence in following the
Path. Unshakable faith comes by realizing that Buddha Dhamma describes our world as it is.
11. Now let us briefly discuss the aññamañña paccayā, usually translated as “mutuality condition”.
This is not a bad translation, but it could be also translated as “forward and backward condition”.
§ Many of the steps in the PS cycle, go backward as well as forward. For example, the step we
have discussed, “viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” runs backwards (in the same PS cycle) too.
§ Therefore, while nāmarūpa are generated AND get stronger by a given viññāṇa, the viññāṇa
itself gets stronger by the cultivation of nāmarūpa, i.e., “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāṇa” step runs
simultaneously too. This is the “mutual strengthening”.
§ In the example of the teenager, cultivation of those bad nāmarūpa (visuals of party scenes, bad
friends etc) leads to the strengthening of that bad viññāṇa (desire to drink or take drugs), even
though the bad viññāṇa first led to corresponding nāmarūpa.
12. The aññamañña paccayā — just like the āsevana paccayā — is highly effective in the first several
steps in PS. While “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra” step initiates bad actions (or saṅkhāra), the continued
actions in the same direction then lead to strengthening avijjā (or ignorance of the consequences of
such actions), i.e., “saṅkhāra paccayā avijjā“.
§ This is why it is very important to stop such conscious saṅkhāra (especially sankalapana or the
first part of vacī saṅkhāra), when one realizes that one is getting into the wrong track.
Otherwise, one’s avijjā will grow and one’s bad gathi will only grow.
§ Such immoral saṅkhāra — in the form of vacī saṅkhāra — appear to provide us with a sense of
satisfaction at that time. For example, when one gets “really worked up” thinking about a bad
deed done by an enemy, it gives one pleasure to say bad things about that person to others, or
even retaliate directly to that person.
13. However, such actions actually lead to a “heat” or “tāpa” in us in the longer term. Long after that
“initial satisfaction” of putting down that person, one will be “burning inside” for long times, even of
one does not realize that. One will be prone to frequent outbursts even with other people.
§ Removal of this tāpa or “fire” in us is what is meant by the phrase “ātāpi sampajano” in the
Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta. That will help reduce our tendency to get “worked up” at the slightest
provocation, i.e., to change our gati in the right direction.
§ This is the first type of suffering that many of us don’t even realize; see, “Suffering in This Life
– Role of Mental Impurities” and other posts in “Living Dhamma“.
14. Finally, the aññamañña paccayā is not operative starting at the “saḷāyatana paccayā phassa” step
in the paṭicca samuppāda.
§ We can clearly see that “phassa cannot lead to saḷāyatana“, “vedanā cannot lead to phassa“,
etc.
July 1, 2019: Regarding #2 above, it is important to note that āsevana is different from asevana.
IX Comments/Reviews
These are based on questions sent to me via email by readers prior to 2018. In late 2017, a discussion
forum was launched: “Forums“.
What is Intention in Kamma?
Would Nibbāna be Possible if Impermanence is the Cause of Suffering?
Logical Proof that Impermanence is Incorrect Translation of Anicca
“Self” and “no-self”: A Simple Analysis
Craving for Pornography – How to Reduce the Tendency
9.1.1 What is Intention in Kamma?
1. Here is an email that I received in early September, 2015 (I am just showing the relevant part of the
email):
“You mention several times that one should be very careful not to offend anyone as one could insult a
Sotāpanna and gather a big amount of bad Kamma. Kamma it is created based on ones mind. Act and
speak with a pure mind and no bad Kamma will arise. Act and speak with an evil mind and bad
Kamma will arise.
Offending a Sotāpanna is no more an evil act than offending an ant if your mind state is the
same , thus if one does not know that a human being is enlightened it will not result in a different
Kamma.
What makes offending an enlightened being so much worse is the fact that it requires a very
perverted mind state to act evil towards some like that. I like to compare it with being angry at kittens
:–)
I had the feeling that you might have a misunderstanding regarding this topic. It sounded as if you
can ‘accidentally’ gather bad Kamma, which is not correct in my opinion”.
§ In the above comment, emphasize in bold is mine to indicate each key point. I think what is
meant by that first statement is that having adverse thoughts is the bad thing and it does not
matter to whom it was directed.
§ The second point is that if one doesn’t know the status of the person (or being) it was directed
to, then one must not be responsible for the kamma.
2. I am sure many others had similar thoughts on this or somewhat related issues, so I wanted to share
the reply with everyone. By the way, we have a new discussion forum (since December 2017) to
discuss such questions; see, “WebLink: Forum“.
§ Figuring out how kamma works (with certainty) can be done by only a Buddha. This is one
of those things that are discernible only to a Buddha. But as I have pointed out before, we can
figure out some general trends that are compatible with the laws that the Buddha has clearly
stated; see, “What is Kamma? – Is Everything Determined by Kamma?“. Here we analyze in a
bit more depth.
3. There are two key factors to be remembered in evaluating how to assess a kamma vipāka:
1. Which of the dasa akusala is the intention? For example, it could be taking a life, stealing, or
harsh speech. Who is affected is not involved in this step. That is the “cetana” in “cetana ham
bhikkhave kamman vadami”, is just which dasa akusala is in one’s mind; that is all.
2. Then the strength of the kamma vipāka is based on the “level of consciousness” or
“qualities” of the living beings affected by that kamma. For example, killing a human will
bring stronger kamma vipāka than killing an animal.
§ That is the clearest way to analyze any given situation.
4. For example, in the recent second desanās on Tilakkhaṇa, I discussed the case of a person killing a
bunch of people with a bomb; see Discourse 2 in “Three Marks of Existence – English Discourses“.
§ His intention (cetana) was to kill. Thus the dasa akusala involved is “panatipata”, that of
taking a life.
§ Now to the second step. He may not even know who was killed. By some coincidence if a
parent of the killer was killed by the bomb, then he would have done an anantariya papa
kamma. If an Arahant was killed, the same. If a Sotāpanna was killed, then it would not be a
anantariya kamma, but still equivalent to killing thousands of normal humans.
§ So, it is important to understand that “cetana” is which of dasa sakusala are in one’s mind
when a kamma is committed. It could be more than one. In the case of the bomber, there is
micchā diṭṭhi, and likely greed also, in addition to “panatipata”.
§ One can analyze various situations with the above two steps.
5. We know that there are five anantariya kamma, which are so grave that one will be subjected to
their vipāka in the very next life in the niraya (lowest realm): Killing one’s mother, Killing one’s
father, Killing an Arahant, and injuring a Buddha (it is not possible for anyone to take the life of a
Buddha), and causing schism in the Saṅgha (which really means trying to propagate a wrong version
of the Buddha Dhamma).
§ Since killing a normal human is not an anantariya kamma, it is clear that the “strength of the
kamma” depends on who is being killed.
§ Kamma vipāka for committing any other offense, is similar. Hurting an Arahant would be
million -fold grave compared to hurting a normal human. Thus, logically, hurting an Anāgāmī,
a Sakadāgāmī, a Sotāpanna would have corresponding levels of consequences.
§ The “value of a life” depends on the “mental status” of that lifeform. Any life is not the same.
This is why it is not possible to compare the life of an animal with that of a human; even among
animals there are huge variations, and we can easily see that a gorilla or a dog is “more
sentient” than a worm.
§ However, we must keep in mind that we all had been born a lowly worm; so even though we
need to keep in mind that there is a variation, we should never take the life of ANY sentient
being intentionally (unnecessarily).
6. Regarding the issue of “how would one know” the status of the living being who is affected by
one’s actions, the “nature” would know.
§ This point of “we are all inter-connected” is now proven by quantum mechanics: “Quantum
Entanglement – We Are All Connected“.
§ This is a key factor in understanding kamma/vipāka, and is my next project. I believe that
quantum mechanics can show this at an even deeper level.
7. L us consider some prominent examples from the Tipiṭaka.
§ It is clearly stated that the reason ascetic Siddhartha had to strive for 6 years and undergo such
hardships to attain the Buddhahood is that he had said some insulting things regarding the
Buddha Kassapa in a previous life. At that time, Siddhartha was a wealthy person by the name
Jotipala, and had a friend called Gatikara who listened to desanās from Buddha Kassapa and
became an Anāgāmī. Gatikara tried to persuade Jotipala to go and listen to Buddha Kassapa,
but Jotipala kept refusing, saying “I do not want to go and listen to the bald-headed monk”.
§ That was the kamma that forced ascetic Siddhartha to undergo such hardships before attaining
the Buddhahood. This is a very clear example that one DOES NOT NEED TO KNOW that one
is insulting a Buddha to accumulate the corresponding kamma vipāka.
§ In fact, there are 11 more such kamma vipāka that brought about adverse effects to the Buddha
Gotama even after attaining the Buddhahood. Three of those were for bad kamma committed
against Pacceka Buddhas. It is especially not possible to recognize a Pacceka Buddha as
such, because they appear during times when a Sammā Sambuddha (like Buddha Gotama) is
not present, and they cannot teach Dhamma to others.
§ Therefore, NOT KNOWING the status of the person (or the being) against whom the wrong act
was done DOES NOT come into play. These are not rules made up by the Buddha; Buddha
himself was not immune from those laws. Kammic laws are natural laws, just like laws of
gravity; a Buddha just discovers them.
8. So, I hope the questions of the reader were addressed in the above. Another important thing to
realize is that any akusala kamma involves just one or more of the ten defilements (dasa akusala).
That is all. And the severity of the kamma vipāka depends on the “status of the victim” and not
knowing that status is not an excuse. We will discuss this in a bit more detail below.
9. To do that, let us look at the “intention” part a bit more carefully. First let us see the key factors
involved in committing an akusala kamma.
§ Any akusala kamma results from INTENDING TO DO one or more of the dasa akusala.
§ A given akusala kamma has several stages (each has a different number of steps). For example,
in the case of taking a life, the following are the four steps: there must be a living being, one
must know that it is alive and one must have the intention to kill that being, one plans and
carries out the necessary actions to kill, and finally the living being ends up dead. If all
necessary steps are completed, then it is called a kamma patha.
§ As the number of completed steps keep increasing, the severity of the vipāka will increase;
when all are complete and a kamma patha is done, the kamma vipāka will be strongest possible.
10. Let us take as example the case of killing a human being. Now we have to combine the two
effects in #3 and #4 above in order to assess the strength of the kamma vipāka.
§ The human being in question could be a normal human or a Noble person, say an Arahant.
There is no way for the killer to know whether the victim is an Arahant. Thus the resulting
kamma vipāka could be quite different depending on the “status of the victim” and the killer
may even not know the severity of the crime committed.
§ Now, suppose the killer went through the first four steps, but the victim survived. Now the
killer will not face an anantariya kamma because he/she merely injured an Arahant even
though the intention was to kill. Still, the strength of the kamma vipāka will be much higher
compared to injuring a normal human.
§ Kamma vipāka are based on natural laws. Their enforcement is automatic. Just like gravity
operates regardless of the person involved, so do kamma vipāka.
11. Therefore, the above analysis can be used in any given case to get an idea of the strength of
the kamma vipāka for a given offense. To summarize:
12. To further clarify the mechanisms, let us consider another example. Suppose person X detects a
person moving around in X’s house at night. Thinking it is an intruder, and INTENDING TO KILL
the intruder, X shoots and kills ” the intruder”. And then X finds out that it is X’s own father.
§ The intention was to kill (one of the dasa akusala), and the victim turned out to be X’s own
father. Thus even though X did not intend to kill his father, X has now acquired an anantariya
kamma.
13. In another twist, let us say that X was on the roof of his house repairing it, and he threw
something heavy from the roof without realizing that his father was right below the roof on the
ground. And the father got hit and was killed.
§ Here, there was no intention of killing a living being. Thus even though the action resulted in
the father’s death, not even an akusala kamma was committed let alone an anantariya kamma.
14. This is why we have to be careful in analyzing some cases.
§ When we encounter someone anywhere, just by looking at him/her, we cannot say whether
he/she is a Noble person or not.
§ But we can definitely see the difference between an animal and a human being. A human life
has much more worth than any animal life; it is extremely difficult get a “human bhava“.
§ Even among the animals, we can see that some animals are “more sentient” than others, even
though there are no clear guidelines.
§ However, one definitely does not need to worry about “accidental killings” of insects, for
example, who may get crushed under one’s feet as one walks around.
15. Going back to another statement in the comment of the reader: “..What makes offending an
enlightened being so much worse is the fact that it requires a very perverted mind state to act evil
towards someone like that”.
§ The problem is that most times we do not know whether a given person is a Sotāpanna or not.
And most people may not have even heard “who a Sotāpanna is”.
§ Yet, the consequences will be the same whether one knew or not.
16. Please let me know if anyone has further questions related to this issue, or any other relevant
specific case that is still not resolved. I can revise the post to add more details or try to address any
other “tricky cases” if needed. In the following I am going to discuss the “intention” issue in a bit
more depth for the benefit of those who like to dig deeper.
§ The Buddha said, “cetana ham Bhikkave kamman vadami“. Thus, what determines the type of
kamma is the cetana. So, we need to look at the cetana cetasika carefully.
§ Cetana is translated sometimes as “intention” and other times as “volition”. It is hard to
distinguish the difference between the two; volition seems to incorporate “more personal
attributes” and thus may be better. But neither is really a correct translation for cetana.
§ As I point out below, cetana is not “intention” in the sense that it is not the cetana cetasika that
determines the nature of a citta. Cetana combines the cumulative effect of many cetasika
that come into play. This is why sometimes it is best to keep the Pāli terms and understand
their meanings.
17. I have introduced cetasika in “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“, and have discussed some aspects of
them in the “Citta and Cetasika” section.
§ Thus cetana, which is one of the seven universal cetasika, is in each and every citta, even
though we do not “intend to do something” with all citta. As briefly pointed in “Cetasika
(Mental Factors)“, cetana is the cetasika that “puts together the relevant cetasika into a given
citta“. This is also discussed in “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“.
§ The “intention” is one of the dasa akusala in the case of an akusala kamma. That intention
arises BECAUSE OF one’s gathi with certain set of cetasika being dominant.
§ For akusala kamma, moha (ignorance) and three other cetasika, Ahirika (shamelessness),
Anottapa (fearlessness in wrong), and uddhacca (restlessness or agitation) are always there,
because they are the “four universals” for any akusala citta.
§ But the presence of other “akusala cetasika” like lobha, diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, etc depends on the
situation and the person committing the act; see, “Cetasika – Connection to Gathi“. For
example, one may lie about something because of greed (lobha); another person may tell
the same lie because of hate (dosa); the consequences are worse for the latter.
§ Intention is to commit one (or more) of the dasa akusala. Thus cetana is not “intention” per se;
it is deeper. It also depends on how that determination came about. When the Buddha said,
“cetana ham Bhikkave kamman vadami“, that is what he meant: How that particular intention
came about depends on the set of relevant bad cetasika.
§ For kusala kamma is works the same way. Here the “intention” is to commit one or more
kusala kamma, and here a set of moral (or sobhana) cetasika come into play.
18. Thus we can keep digging deeper to get a more deeper understanding. But please do not get
discouraged if you do not understand all the details. It takes time, as I know by experience.
§ The more one thinks about a concept, one realizes that there could be multiple ways to look at
it. That does not lead to confusion, but to more clarity. This is the power of pure Dhamma.
§ There are many things to contemplate on this issue, even without getting into Abhidhamma.
This is what real “bhāvanā” is, especially leading to the Sotāpanna stage.
This issue is being discussed at the discussion forum at, “WebLink: Adding Kamma vs. Receiving
Vipāka” and “WebLink: Clarification of definition – “Anantariya”“.
9.1.2 Would Nibbana be Possible if Impermanence is the Cause of
Suffering?
1. I recently received a very insightful email from Mr. Lance Potter. Before getting to his email, let
me provide some background (Of course I would give the name of the commenter only with his/her
consent).
§ He was commenting about the post, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations”. In that
post, I discussed briefly a phrase from the Ajjhattanicca Sutta:
“yadaniccam tan dukkham, tan dukkham tadanatta”
§ This phrase is translated in most current Theravāda literature (including the Sinhala translation
of the Tipiṭaka; see, Saṃyutta Nikāya – 3, p. 3 of the Pāli/Sinhala Tipiṭaka ) as:
“if something is impermanent, suffering arises, therefore ‘no-self’”
§ In that post, I discussed some inconsistencies arising due to such a translation. I also pointed
out that the phrase is consistent if one takes the correct interpretations of anicca and anatta, i.e.,
“that one cannot maintain anything to one’s satisfaction in the long run” and “(therefore) one is
truly helpless in this rebirth process”.
2. Let me quote the relevant text from his email:
“The line of reasoning that says that anicca means simply impermanence and that impermanence
leads to dukha seems weak to me. The weakness lies is an apparent missing link. Logically, there
must be an intervening link, a necessary link, between impermanence and dukha. That link would be
the actual cause of dukha. If the cause of dukha were simply impermanence, then no one who
awakened, not even Buddha himself, would experience a reduction of dukha. This is because the
condition of impermanence in saṃsāra remains unchanged whether one is awakened or not. In
6. Dukkha Sacca means that dukha can be removed. Dukkha in “Dukkha Sacca” means “there is
dukha (suffering) in this world, AND it can be eliminated” ; see, “Does the First Noble Truth
Describe only Suffering?“.
§ As explained in that sutta with that phrase, the “three characteristics” of this world are
interrelated. Not only that, the key characteristic is “anicca“, i.e., nothing in this world can
be maintained to our satisfaction in the long run. The sutta says that Dukha (suffering)
arises BECAUSE of the nicca saññā we have for things that have anicca nature, and thus the
third characteristic (anatta) becomes self-evident, i.e., one is truly helpless since one cannot get
rid of dukha (unless one gets rid of the nicca saññā).
7. Thus nicca is a PERCEPTION in one’s mind. Through endless rebirths we thought that we can
achieve happiness by acquiring sense objects that provide us with sense pleasures. Thus we keep
“craving for such objects”, and believe that they will provide us with happiness; this is the wrong
perception of nicca. It is called the nicca saññā.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Comments/Reviews 959
§ Thus the four stages of Nibbāna are attained when one develops the opposite saññā, i.e., anicca
saññā in stages, and is complete only at the Arahanthood.
§ If one did not crave for anything in this world, there is NOTHING in this world that one
willingly binds to (paṭicca = “pati + “icca”). If we can stop this paṭicca process (or willingly
bind to things in this world), then there will be no “samuppāda (“sama” + “uppada”) or births
corresponding such cravings. Thus according to paṭicca samuppāda, there will be no more
rebirths; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“. And that is rāgakkhaya or
Nibbāna.
8. Therefore, now we have a possible way to prevent dukha from arising: we need to remove all types
of cravings for impermanent material objects from our MINDS.
§ Of course that is easy to be said than done. We attach to things in this world because they
provide tangible sense pleasures. No one can deny that, and it is very hard to resist many sense
pleasures for which we have had attachments from beginningless time.
§ Thus we have to do it in stages. No one (except a few who have developed required mindset
over many past births) can do it quickly.
§ The critical first step to Nibbāna is the Sotāpanna stage. And that is gained just by gaining the
first understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ It is hard to believe, but an enormous fraction of our craving for worldly things will be removed
at the Sotāpanna stage when the realization hits that certain immoral things are NOT WORTH
doing for the sake of long-term benefit. That is something that will be ingrained in the mind and
one does not need to think about it.
9. It is stated in the Nakhasikha Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya – 2, p. 212 of the Pāli/Sinhala Tipiṭaka) that
the amount of defilements that a Sotāpanna has left to remove can be compared to the soil one can
pick up on one’s fingernail, if the amount of defilements a normal human has is comparable to the
soil in the whole Earth; see, “What is the only Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?“.
§ A short but correct translation of the essence of the sutta is also available online:
This post was written in response to a comment made by Mr. Alexander Ausweger, on the basis of
which I slightly revised the post “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations” to make it more
precise. I would like to get feedback from anyone interested, especially those who are experts on
mathematical logic.
1. Using mathematical logic, it is possible to point out the flaw in translating anicca, dukkha, anatta
as impermanence, suffering, and no-self. It does not require advanced mathematical concepts, but
basic logical structure that is explained in the following Wikipedia article:
WebLink: WIKI: Tautology (logic)
2. As explained in the post, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“, in the Ajjhattanicca
Sutta in the Saṃyutta Nikāya, the Buddha stated that the three characteristics of “this world” are
RELATED to each other:
“yadaniccam tan dukkham, tan dukkham tadanatta”
OR, (anicca → dukkha) and (dukkha → anatta)
Here, there are two logical statements, which can be written as (with incorrect translations with
anicca, dukkha, anatta translated as impermanence, suffering, and no-self respectively):
(impermanence → suffering) and (suffering → no-self)
§ There are an infinite physical things in this vast universe and ALL are impermanent. But not
all of them cause anyone’s suffering. One’s suffering is caused only by those things that
one willingly attaches to with the nicca saññā , as we will see below.
3. First let us consider just the part: (impermanence → suffering)
When we use the law of contraposition,
(“if A implies B, then not-B implies not-A“),
we get:
no suffering → permanence , i.e., if one is not suffering that implies something (the object in
question) is permanent.
§ But we can take many examples where “not suffering” does not imply a permanency. For
example, when we hear a death of a rival there is no suffering associated with that.
§ In another example if we get rid of a non-curable disease, that is associated with no-suffering.
Thus, in both examples, the “no-suffering” condition did not imply a “permanence”.
Therefore, the original statement, (impermanence → suffering) DOES NOT HOLD.
4. Now let us look at another way to analyze. Normally, the statement A → B does not lead to ¬ A
→ ¬B (i.e., not A → not B does not automatically follow).
However, if B is dependent only on A and no other factor, then the statement ¬ A → ¬ B would be
valid.
§ For an example, (rain → wet street), does not automatically lead to (no rain → dry street),
because the street could get wet due to a garden hose being left open.
§ However, if the only cause for wetness of the street is rain, then (no rain → dry street) is
CORRECT.
5. In the case of the three characteristics, the nature of this world is either nicca or anicca. There is no
“in between”, i.e., it is either “nicca” or “anicca“.
The nicca or anicca nature can lead dukha, sukha, AND also neutral feeling. Thus here we will
consider just dukha or “no-dukha” for this analysis. Then, there is nothing in between those two.
The third characteristic is either “atta” or “anatta“.
Thus, for this proof, we CAN rewrite the original statement,
(anicca → dukkha) and (dukkha → anatta) as,
(nicca → no-dukkha) and (no-dukkha → natta),
and those two statements are identical.
6. Therefore, if we translate nicca and anicca as permanent and impermanent, then the statement,
(impermanence → suffering) also implies, (permanence → no-suffering), because in our premise that
suffering depends only on whether something is permanent or impermanent.
§ Thus, we have, for our particular case: (permanence → no-suffering)
§ Therefore, in our special case for the three characteristics of nature, we have: (permanence →
no-suffering) AND (no suffering → permanence).
In the mathematical language of logic, this is written as:
(no suffering iff permanence), i.e., (no suffering if and only if permanence)
§ Since we know that “everything can be maintained to our satisfaction in the long run” is
not correct, it is impossible to attain a state of “no suffering” as long as one is in this world, i.e.,
in the cycle of rebirths.
§ We can analyze any situation and see that “nothing in this world can be maintained to one’s
satisfaction in the long run”. Thus everything experienced in this world eventually lead to
suffering. The only way to get rid of suffering is to realize this critical point; that realization
itself leads to the end of suffering.
§ Thus “avijjā” is nothing but not realizing this fundamental characteristic of nature.
§ The realization of the truth of “anicca nature of this world” is beyond “just understanding”. The
mind has to accept that without any doubt. One needs to analyze as many cases as one
encounters in real life and convince oneself that this is the case. If you can think about an
exception, please let me know.
8. Now we can also derive a similar strong relationship between anicca and anatta as between anicca
and dukkha that we derived in #6 above. Here we use the principle of syllogism:
Thus the original relationship, (anicca → dukkha) and (dukkha → anatta) lead to:
anicca → anatta
§Now using the same derivation of #4 and #5, we get, anatta → anicca.
Thus we again have the strong statement,
§ anatta if and only if anicca
That means anatta is inevitable if the nature (this world) is of anicca nature.
9. Now, again if we take the wrong translations of impermanence and no-self for anicca and anatta
respectively, what we derived above means: whatever is impermanent does not have a “self”.
This is a meaningless statement for inert objects in this world.
Nothing in this world can be maintained to one’s satisfaction and therefore one is helpless in
this world (i.e., will be subjected to suffering).
§ However, that holds only as long as one TRYING TO maintain things to one’s satisfaction with
the wrong perception that it is achievable. When one realizes the true nature, one will stop from
attaching to things in this world, and eventually will not be born in this material world. The
mind will be released from the “material base” that is the cause of our long-term suffering.
§ Thus, the only way to get out of the “helplessness in this cycle of rebirths” is to get rid of the
nicca saññā (the perception that one CAN maintain things to one’s satisfaction), and cultivate
the anicca saññā, the correct perception about anything in this world. That is the way to
Nibbāna, which it is attained via steps.
10. Thus, it is important to realize that the “loophole” that the Buddha discovered in order to gain
release from the inevitable suffering in this world, is to comprehend its “anicca nature” and stop
craving for worldly things that “seem to provide sense pleasures”.
§ In other words, the solution is “to realize that seeking happiness in this world is not only
unachievable, but it also leads to suffering”. One is subjected to suffering ONLY BECAUSE
one is WILLINGLY ATTACHING to worldly things that are intrinsically not setup to provide
happiness in the long run.
§ This act of “willingly attaching to things in this world” is called “paṭicca” (“pati” means
bonding and “ichcha” means with liking). And this of course leads to “sama uppāda” (“sama”
means same or similar and “uppāda” means another existence in this world). This is the
fundamental reason why we can never remove the suffering in this cycle of rebirths as long as
we have “avijjā“, the principle of “paṭicca samuppāda“; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“.
§ Thus now we can see why the akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with “avijjā
paccayā saṅkhāra“: that is because we have the “nicca saññā“, the perception that we can
maintain things to our satisfaction.
11. If the “anicca nature of this world” is a FACT, then the other two logically follow: nothing in
this world can be logically expected to provide “no-suffering” (i.e., either happiness or neutral state
of mind), and thus one is truly helpless (anatta) and is struggling to achieve something that logically
impossible to achieve.
§ The key point is that we normally ACT with “nicca saññā” or with the perception that we can
maintain things to our satisfaction. Thus we go against the nature and will be subjected to
suffering in the long run. This is a subtle point to contemplate and comprehend. The “anicca
nature” will lead us to suffering ONLY IF we take the opposite view of “nicca saññā“.
§ There are two things to sort out: anicca nature (of the world) and “nicca saññā” (in our
MINDS). The way to be released from this world of anicca nature is to comprehend that (i.e.,
cultivate the anicca saññā) and thereby not attach (paṭicca) to things in this world.
§ Of course it is not an easy task. The realization is achieved in stages. Even at the Sotāpanna
stage one realizes this at a basic level.
§ This is the basis of Buddha Dhamma, and that is explained via many different ways, paṭicca
samuppāda being the key. The akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with “avijjā
paccayā (abhi)saṅkhāra“, which arises due to the “nicca saññā“, and ends up with “jara,
marana, soka, perideva, dukkha, domanassa…..“. We generate our own future suffering by
doing abhisaṅkhāra (actions, speech, thoughts generated by greed, hate, and ignorance) due to
our nicca saññā.
§ This is also why we cannot get rid of greedy, hateful, and foolish thoughts until we comprehend
the true anicca nature of this world and cultivate the anicca saññā. Such thoughts arise
AUTOMATICALLY in a mind that has the nicca saññā.
I like to address two comments that I recently received. Questions such as these bring out significant
issues that help clarify fundamental concepts.
***
First comment (by Mr. Alexander Ausweger):
Premises:
(1) The number of rebirths of a single sentient being before now is infinite.
(2) The probability of becoming an Arahant in one life-phase (from birth to death) is minuscule but
not zero. (The possible probability-values range from 0 to 1 as usual in probability theory).
Conclusion: In an infinite number of rebirths the probability to reach Arahantship would be one,
which means that everyone would already has left saṃsāra.
Conclusion: Since we are still here, one of the premises must be wrong.
***
Second comment (by Mr. Chamila Wickramasinghe):
“….in akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda, since “avijjā anusaya” is still remaining for a person below
the Arahant stage, is there not a single “chitta-kshana” (or citta) that arises without avijjā? ..”
***
Embedded in both the above comments, there is a perception of a well-defined “self”. That
there is “a well-defined sentient being” that goes through a cycle of rebirths. Since we use
names to label a person, that automatically gives the impression of a non-changing “self.” Thus
it is a bit hard to remove this “sense of a self” from our minds.
§ The other side of this issue is the common misconception that “anatta” means “no-self”. Even
though that is correct in a strict sense, there is a sense of a “self” until one attains the
Arahanthood. The other meaning of “anatta” is “being helpless” and “subject to suffering,” as
long as one has the perception of a “self.”
§ That is why the Buddha said it is wrong to believe that there is a “self,” and it is also incorrect
to think that “there is no-self.” That is a bit difficult to comprehend first; that is why the
Buddha said, “My Dhamma has never been known to the world…”. So we will discuss
some examples to clarify why both these views are not correct.
Let us first discuss the First comment. The answer to the second comment will become apparent
during that discussion.
1. The critical issue brought out by the first comment is the first premise itself: By assuming that
“there is a single sentient being…” we are distorting the actual reality. This is saying that there is a
“soul” or “self.” To give an absolute identity to an entity (a lifeform), there must be something
unchanging in it.
§ Now, let us discuss HOW the Buddha explained that the above premise is not correct.
§ At the time of the Buddha, many believed in an “ātma” or a “soul” or a “self”. When asked
what is a “person” is unique to give that absolute identity, some said it was one’s body (rūpa).
Others said either one’s feelings (vedanā), one’s perceptions (saññā), one’s actions (saṅkhāra),
one’s thoughts (viññāṇa), or some combinations of the above five. However, we are not
talking about pañcakkhandha here, i.e., not rūpakkhandha etc. I will write a series of posts
later to clarify the difference.
§ A “person” can acquire a “new identity” within moments. We have talked about several people
who attained Arahanthood within a few minutes. Even these days, we have heard about people
who have made drastic changes in their character within a few months. Of course, we can gain
or lose significant weight in a month and change our appearance.
5. The absolute truth (paramatta) is that all our mental phenomena CAN change moment-to-moment.
Some of this mental activity arise due to avijjā and can lead to significant changes even in real-time;
see, “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ While using conventional terminology (vohara), we need to keep in mind that the absolute
reality (paramatta) is that the “state of existence” changes moment-to-moment.
§ Our physical bodies (and any material form or a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)) change with
time. Some change fast (a fruit fly lives a few days; thus its body goes from birth to ripe age to
being dead in a few days), but others change slower (a tortoise lives about 200 years).
6. Thus “a person,” in absolute reality, CAN change for better or worse even moment-to-moment,
according to paṭicca samuppāda.
§ A kusala paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with “kusala-mūla paccayā saṅkhāra”; see, “Kusala-
Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ An akusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”; see,
“Akusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda” and “Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ But most of the time, we do things that are neither kusala or akusala.
§ Thus avijjā is not there ALL THE TIME, even for a normal human being. Avijjā is triggered
when a desirable/undesirable sense input tempts one.
7. Now we can address the second comment. Yes. the avijjā anusaya is there with anyone who has
not attained the Arahant stage of Nibbāna. But not all thoughts (citta) arise due to avijjā, and there
are many levels of avijjā when it appears.
§ Anusaya means our cravings and habits (that we have acquired through avijjā) that lie
underneath the surface waiting for a trigger to surface.
§ Thus avijjā itself is not something that is there all the time. A average human being acts without
avijjā most of the time. Only when one does something with a greed, dislike, or without fully
understanding of the situation, one takes action with avijjā.
§ Avijjā is triggered by a sensory input that is either pleasing or displeasing to our mind, and
whether a given “trigger” will set off avijjā will depend on one’s gati (gathi) and anusaya; see,
“Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“, “Sansāric Habits,
Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsava)“, and “Gati to Bhava to Jāti – Ours to Control“.
§ Thus it is not correct to say that a average human is an entity with avijjā. There is no such
“fixed living being,” i.e., one with “self.” The only things that can be associated with “a
person” are his/her gati and anusaya; these keep changing too.
8. Even when avijjā arises, it can occur at many different levels ranging from moha (totally covered
mind) to just not knowing the Four Noble Truths. In that latter case, one may do moral acts (puññābhi
saṅkhāra) but expecting meritorious results. Here also the akusala-mūla PS cycle operates but will
lead to good births within the 31 realms.
§ Only when one does meritorious acts without any future expectations, that one does not act
with avijjā, and the kusala-mūla PS cycle operates. That happens when one has comprehended
that it is unfruitful to strive for anything in this world, i.e., when one becomes an Ariya. An
Ariya below the Arahant stage may act with avijjā at lower levels (i.e., would not act with
moha).
§ But in most cases, we disregard what was see, hear, etc. Unless one becomes interested in
something, avijjā does not arise.
§ Thus avijjā is something that is not there all the time for any person. The avijjā anusaya gets
triggered by a sensory input.
9. Getting back to the first comment, instead of saying either “a person exists” or “a person does not
exist”, the Buddha said a living being exists moment-to-moment. We cannot deny that people exist;
but there is nothing absolute about “a person”. Instead, “a person” continually changes; we
conventionally call a person “John Smith”, etc.
§ Another way to say the same thing is to say that “a living being” exists in a given state until the
cause (and conditions) that give rise to that existence exist. Once root causes are changed, that
existence will change to a new one. For example, if a human starts doing things that animals
usually do, then that person will likely get an animal birth after death.
10. We can get more insight on both comments by considering what happens when one attains the
Arahanthood.
§ One attains the Arahanthood when one loses avijjā anusaya; see the links in #7. When that
happens, avijjā will not get triggered by ANY sense input. There is no “upādāna” for any
likes/dislikes. Thus at death, there in no “sama uppada” (birth of similar characteristics)
corresponding to “paṭicca” (whatever one willingly attach to).
§ But the kammic energy that fueled the present life is still there. So, just a rock thrown by
someone will stay up until the energy given to it is exhausted, the Arahant will live until the
kammic energy for his/her life is exhausted. Still, he/she will not be tempted by any sensory
input, since there is no āsava/anusaya left.
§ An Arahant will experience all sense inputs just like any other human being, but will not
generate any likes/dislikes. And since he/she is likely to have many kamma vipāka left, he/she
could also experience pains and aches or even worse. The Buddha himself suffered from some
ailments, and Ven. Moggalana was beaten to death.
§ It is the FUTURE SUFFERING that is removed at the Arahant stage. Since there is no rebirth,
there is no future suffering. The mind is forever released from the material body that CAN
AND WILL impart suffering to those who remain in the saṃsāra, the cycle of rebirths.
9.1.5 Craving for Pornography – How to Reduce the Tendency
March 4, 2016
This post is not based on questions put to me directly. But I get a list of key search words, and it
seems that many people would like to know how to suppress sexual urges and to reduce the tendency
to visit pornographic sites.
1. Of course engaging in sexual activities with one’s spouse is not a problem for even a Sotāpanna. It
is only when one gets to the Anāgāmī stage that one AUTOMATICALLY loses the sexual urge; see,
“The Cooling Down Process (Nibbāna) – How Root Causes are Removed“.
§ Cravings for normal sense pleasures (sexual or otherwise) CANNOT be removed by sheer
will power, just like darkness cannot be removed by willing for light. Darkness can be gotten
rid of only by bringing in light.
§ In the same way, sense desires can be cleansed only by “cleansing the mind”, i.e, by
contemplating on the true (anicca) nature of the world. Even a Sotāpanna has only “seen” the
futility of sense pleasures; he/she has not “experienced” the benefits of NOT DESIRING sense
pleasures; see the posts in the “Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna“.
§ We have had an uncountable number of rebirths so far simply because we cannot comprehend
the consequences of attaching to sense pleasures and also because we become angry when we
don’t get what we desire.
§ Those objects that we desire so much will lose their appeal over time. Sense pleasures, sexual
or otherwise, are short-lived. Even if one can have access to sense pleasures, the ABILITY to
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Comments/Reviews 967
enjoy them WILL decrease with time. This is something that people normally do not think
about.
§ The attitude of most people is “I need to enjoy them to the fullest while I can”. But one needs to
at least stay away from extreme behaviors and learn Dhamma while relatively young to avoid
future suffering. When we get really old, we lose not only the ability to enjoy such pleasures,
but also the ability to comprehend Dhamma (because our brains degrade with time).
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Changes: Young to Old
2. Fundamentally, craving sex-related activities is not any different from craving other sense
pleasures. Each person has sansāric habits (gathi) for some specific set of sense pleasure(s).
§ Some have excess craving to eat tasty foods, some like gossiping about others, some like to go
hunting, etc., and some may have the cravings for sexual pleasures, and it is usually a
combination of several. Each person has a unique set, and that changes with time too.
§ The danger with such habits is that under extreme conditions, they could lead to worse actions.
Sexual tendencies could especially become problematic. We all have heard about cases where
“good citizens” committing rape, when prevailing conditions led them to “lose control”.
3. The critical and first thing to do is to get rid of those habits or cravings that bring harm to others. A
Sotāpanna in inherently incapable of doing such extreme acts because his/her mind has grasped the
consequences of such acts without a doubt. Focusing on the sexual urges, one MUST NOT DO
certain things: rape and having relationships with children or others’ spouses are obvious examples.
§ Learning Dhamma helps through all stages of “rehabilitation”. Learning the bad consequences
of extreme habits such as those mentioned above is one way to convince the mind (i.e.,
subconscious viññāṇa) to voluntarily give up those habits.
§ The Buddha said, “don’t do things to others that one would not like to be done to oneself”.
Always try to pause a moment and contemplate on the consequences of any harsh act. This is
the basis of “kayanupassana” in Satipaṭṭhāna meditation; see, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
4. It is also important to realize that one cannot remove the basic tendencies for normal sense
pleasures by sheer willpower alone. Trying to do that could bring more harm (stress) than benefits.
§ The key is to train the mind to grasp the bad future consequences of extreme habits and desires
(gathi), whether it is due to excess craving for sex or the tendency to get mad at the slightest
provocation. These are all habits that most likely originated in many lives back.
§ We either develop new habits via repeated use or more likely re-energize and further cultivate
old habits from previous lives.
§ The following links discuss how to change one’s gathi: “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to
Change Habits and Character (Gati)” and “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific
View“, among others. One could just type gathi or habits in the Search button on the top right
and get a list of relevant posts.
5. The other important thing to realize is that one does not NEED TO get rid of less-severe cravings
for sense pleasures (sexual or otherwise) at once. The key is to do it gradually. Actually, it is more
correct to say, “it will happen gradually as one learns Dhamma or the true nature of this world”.
§ The Buddha gave the following simile: When one is cultivating a field, all one needs to do is to
follow the procedures that will optimize bringing a good harvest. One needs to prepare the soil,
plant good seeds, and then make sure that weeds are kept out, and water and nutrients are
provided on a regular basis. There is no point in watching the plants throughout the day to see
whether they are growing or to worry about them. They will grow and yield a good harvest if
one does one’s part.
§ In the same way, one needs first to understand the basic wider world view, i.e., that we are
spending a relatively short time in this life and move from life-to-life based on causes that we
ourselves create (based on how we live). The post on dasa akusala (ten defilements) is a guide
on which actions are to be reduced and eventually stopped.
6. Here is a list of key things that is comparable to making the soil ready for seeds to be planted:
§ One needs to first understand, at least to some some extent, the long-term nature of our lives far
beyond our deaths. Many people believe that it all ends with this life. What if that is not
correct? One needs to be make sure, because the answer to that question may have
consequences for billions and trillions of years to come.
§ Also, do things just happen, or do they happen due to CAUSES? Science is based on cause and
effect: things ALWAYS happen due to (multiple) causes. People just don’t get born out of
nothing. There are causes that led to the birth of a human being (or any other living being). The
Buddha said these causes are the kamma, what we have done in the past.
§ There are certain principles or laws that the Nature follows. Scientists can explain most of the
things that happen to inert objects: If one throws up a stone, we can even calculate its path on
the way back to ground. The reason that it falls to the ground is that the Earth is pulling it
down; that is the cause for it to fall down. Like that EACH AND EVERY EVENT has a cause.
Events based on mental causes normally are complex and have multiple causes (and hard to sort
out).
7. One needs to contemplate on the consequences of over-indulgences: (1) They are short-lived, and
when one’s ability to enjoy them goes away, one gets depressed, (2) Such over-indulgences build
corresponding character or “gathi“, and one’s future births are according to one’s gathi.
§ Another sansāric gathi is the tendency to get angry at the slightest provocation. Here also one
needs to think about the bad consequences of that behavior.
§ In both cases, the bad consequences are two-fold: The short-term consequence is that one gets
stressed out shortly after responding to the “urge” (even though one may briefly enjoy
responding to the urge). The more adverse long-term consequences are worse, i.e., each time
one does it the habit gets strengthened AND depending on the act one may cultivate animal
gathi (when blinded by extreme sense pleasures) or niraya gathi (when blinded by rage).
8. There is a reason that one is born human and another is born an animal. One who was born human
had done a good kamma that deserved being born human; and that kamma was done because that
being had tendency to do that type of deeds. This tendency to do certain things depends on one’s
“gathi“.
§ If a human displays “animal gathi” or does things that animals do (do whatever one feels like
doing without any consideration for others, have sex indiscriminately, etc), then it is likely that
he/she will be born an animal in the future.
§ On the other hand, if a human displays kindness, can even tolerate others’ bad behavior, etc.,
then he/she has deva or brahma “gathi“, then he/she is likely to born a deva, brahma, or a
human, in future lives.
§ In the language of paṭicca samuppāda, “jathi” is according “bhava“, “bhava” according
“upadāna“, “upadāna” according to “taṇhā“, i.e., “what one likes to do or has craving for”.
Thus if one likes to do what dogs normally do, then a future “jathi” or birth as a dog is hard to
avoid. This is true for any other kind of birth.
9. Thus whether it is a sexual craving or any other craving for sense pleasure, we need to be careful
first to avoid any extreme behavior. One cannot jump from the bottom of the ladder to the top; one
has to climb step-by-step. Get rid of the worst habits first and move up on the ladder.
§ The one who was born an animal, was likely to have engaged in activities suitable for an
animal; some of the sexual activities shown in pornographic movies are suitable only for
animals. And such bad deeds were done due to a reason: that being had tendencies or gathi to
do such deeds. They do not change much unless one willfully tries to change them. Getting rid
of such extreme behavior is the first step. The sooner done is better.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Comments/Reviews 969
§ Then one can tackle less severe problems. Always thinking about tasty foods and eating
excessively is as bad as the tendency to watch adult movies habitually. They are both bad habits
that need to be broken gradually, with understanding of the consequences. Of course
pornography has different categories; one tends to watch “extreme” pornography when one has
extreme habits.
§ A living being can significantly change its “gathi” only as a human. An animal is not
capable of any significant change, even though some of its habits can be changed if trained by a
human. Even for devas and brahmas it is hard to change their gathi unless they had attained the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna as a human. We will discuss this more later.
10. In summary, one MUST stop the most harmful acts (which could lead to rebirth in the lowest four
realms or the apāyas) by any means possible using sheer will power. However, other less harmful
acts can be reduced over time and one needs to follow a systematic procedure as outlined in the links
given in # 3 and #4 above.
§ Learning Dhamma can reduce the tendency to engage in any type of immoral or unwise
activities over the long run. In this regard it is important to understand the different levels of
greed and hate; see, “Sorting out Some Key Pāli Terms (Taṇhā, Lobha, Dosa, Moha, etc)” and,
in particular the post, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“.
§ The section on “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana” provides more advanced analyses, especially for
those who are at least on the way to become a Sotāpanna, i.e., a Sotāpanna magga anugami.
§ Thus as long as one “belongs to this world of 31 realms”, one always thinks in terms of “me”
and “the external world”. This is why the Buddha rejected the concept of “no-self” even though
most people incorrectly translate anatta as “no-self”; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma“.
§ On the other hand, the Buddha said that it is also incorrect to say there is “self”. This is because
any “person” changes even moment-to-moment; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a
Lifestream“.
§ In rejecting both “self” and “no-self” extremes, the Buddha said “this changing being” or “a
lifestream” changes moment-to-moment due to changes in the causes that support that
lifestream. This is not something that I can explain in one essay, and is explained via many
posts at the site, including the important section on Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ In the book there is a separate chapter on, “The Self – Do I Really Exist?”. I will discuss that
chapter below, and point out a few more related facts.
3. The book’s main theme is “why is there something rather than nothing?” or “how did the world got
started?”. It summarizes most of the arguments that have accumulated over thousands of years, and of
course come to the inevitable question on “the nature of the Creator God who would not need a cause
for being there”.
§ However, regarding the two questions on existence as expressed above, the Buddha’s answer is
the simplest: The world has existed forever and it is not possible to pinpoint to a specific first
cause. The proof is very simple: Suppose there is a first cause; then what caused that? QED.
§ Thus in the scientific basis of cause and effect, the absence of a first cause is built in.
§ On p. 82 of the book, Jim Holt did point out, “..Scientific thinkers by and large, have not shared
such qualms about eternity. Neither Galileo nor Newton nor Einstein had any problem
conceiving of a universe that was infinite in time. Indeed, Einstein added to his field equations
a fudge factor – the infamous “cosmological constant” – to ensure that they would yield a
universe that was static and eternal“.
§ And a few philosophers have discussed the problem with “first cause” arguments, as Jim Holt
noted. Talking about the late philosopher John Mackie on p. 206, “..Obviously, as Mackie
observed, no explanation in terms of a “first cause” could answer the ultimate question of
existence, for such an explanation would merely raise the further question of why that first
cause -whether it be God, an unstable chunk of false vacuum, or some still more exotic entity-
itself existed”.
4. If one accepts that the world has existed forever, then many other questions discussed in the book
do not even arise. Thus 100% of the questions discussed are answered if we start off with the premise
that the world has existed forever AND the root causes (greed, hate, and ignorance) for the existence
of the world given by the Buddha.
§ For example, on p. 7, Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason is discussed: For every truth,
there must be a reason why it is so and not otherwise; and for every thing, there must be a
reason for that thing’s existence. This is basically “cause and effect”. The Buddha said that the
world exists because of the greed, hate, and ignorance; and those causes have no beginning.
§ This is related to the issue of the mind taking precedence over matter, and I am slowly building
evidence for that in the website. There are some introductory posts in the “Abhidhamma” and
“Dhamma and Philosophy” sections.
§ On p. 188, Jim Holt discusses the fact that all science says about the “stuff that makes up our
world” is that mass is equivalent to energy, “….but it gives us no idea of what energy really
is..”. This is exactly what is explained in Abhidhamma, and I will get to it eventually. He goes
on to say, “…As Bertrand Russell noted in his 1927 book, The Analysis of Matter, when it
comes to the intrinsic nature of the entities making up the world, science is silent”.
§ He also briefly discuss another big issue in philosophy on p. 192: “The conclusion of the
philosophers ……that there is more to consciousness than the mere processing of information.
If this is true, then science, insofar as it describes the world as a play of information states,
would seem to leave out a part of reality: the subjective, irreducibly qualitative part”. Actually,
as we will see, Buddha’s answer solves both this and the issue above in one fell swoop.
§ A world without a beginning also gives an answer to the question of “why do I exist” (p. 18).
We all have “existed” forever; there is no beginning so the question has no meaning. Another
frequently asked question is, “what is the meaning of life?”. There is no meaning to life: The
bottom line is that we all suffer in this existence ON THE AVERAGE, IN THE LONG TERM
while we meander aimlessly among the 31 realms of existence; see, “Evidence for Rebirth“.
5. Now the only critical question is how do we know that the Buddha’s world view is correct? The
answer is that it can explain the complex world around us; it has the “explanatory power”. Also see,
“Vagaries of Life and the Way to Seek Good Births” and “Good Explanations – Key to Weeding out
Bad Versions of Dhamma“, among many other posts.
§ Furthermore, one can EXPERIENCE the truth of Buddha’s teachings and the results for
oneself. I have described part of my experience in following the Path in, “11. Magga Phala and
Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“. Do not be discouraged by the title of the
post.
6. Now let me briefly discuss the 2nd last chapter on, “The Self – Do I Really Exist?”. Here Jim Holt
comes across the answer himself (p. 256): Talking about the Descartes’ famous phrase, “I think,
therefore I exist”, he says, “… ..Did Descartes here infer more than he was entitled to? As many
commentators have pointed out (beginning with Georg Lichtenberg in the eighteenth century), the
“I” in his ultimate premise is not quite legitimate. All Descartes could assert with certainty was
“there are thoughts”. He never proved that thoughts require a thinker……” (bold face mine).
7. This is exactly what the Buddha said. There are thoughts, but no REAL thinker; there is the
PERCEPTION of a thinker in “one’s mind” until one’s mind is purified to the level of an Arahant
and it becomes clear that there is no “thinker”. However, the irony is that until that wisdom is gained,
“one’s suffering” is real. The suffering is there simply because one thinks there is a real thinker!
§ But one cannot honestly say, “there is no-self” as most people try to do, unless one is an
Arahant; one is just trying to fool oneself in saying that. When something bad happens to
“anything that belongs to oneself” one INEVITABLY feels the pain associated with it; see,
“Anatta and Dukkha – True Meanings“.
§ When the mind is purified (i.e., is absent of greed, hate, and ignorance) perception of “self”
goes away at the Arahant stage, then the suffering associated with “one’s stuff” is not there
anymore. When one comprehends the concept of anicca to some extent, this will become clear
to some extent. In other words, Nibbānic bliss or nirāmisa sukha increases as one advances on
the Path, with the mind being purified at each step; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is
Nirāmisa Sukha?“, and “Nirāmisa Sukha“.
§ Thus we cannot forcibly get rid of the sense of “I”. Only through the true understanding of the
Three Characteristics of this world, anicca, dukkha, anatta, that one can slowly start getting rid
of that sense of “I” or “self”. Until then there is neither a “self” nor “no-self”, but just a stream
of thoughts; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“. Only at the death of an
Arahant that stream of thoughts is ended and the mind becomes free of any attachment to the
material world of the 31 realms; see, “Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?“, and “What are
Rūpa? Relation to Nibbāna“.
9.2.2 “Waking Up” by Sam Harris
Sam Harris, “Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion” (2014).
1. I am quite encouraged by the fact that many people are beginning to see through something that is
contrary to the basic human instincts: That it is possible to find a different and more permanent form
of happiness that is not related to material things.
§ Right at the start of the book, when he talks about his first “meditation retreat” at the age of 16
under harsh conditions in wilderness, the author says he was puzzled by the positive reaction of
the older people in the group, “...How could someone’s happiness increase when all the
material sources of pleasure and distraction had been removed?” (p.2).
§ But now with many years of experience in meditation and studies on human nature as a
neuroscientist, he can understand it: “..Unlike many atheists, I have spent much of my life
seeking experiences of the kind that gave ride to world’s religions. Despite the painful results
of my first few days alone in the mountains of Colorado, I later studied with a wide range of
monks, lamas, yogis, and other contemplatives, some of whom had lived for decades in
seclusion doing nothing but meditating. In the process, I spent two years on silent retreat
myself (in increments of one week to three months), practicing various techniques of meditation
for twelve to eighteen hours a day” (pp. 13-14).
2. Harris, like many others, has found that there is something about human life that cannot be
explained away just in terms of the workings of the material world, but cannot quite pinpoint to the
source of that “something extra”.
§Modern science has obliterated the concept of a “divine influence” as has been put forth by
various religions, as Harris explains. So I was quite interested to see what his conclusion would
be as to the “source of this extra something”.
3. On p.8, he makes a very valid statement: “Spirituality must be distinguished from religion –
because of people of every faith, and of none, have had the same sorts of spiritual experiences…
.Nothing that a Christian, a Muslim, and a Hindu can experience – self-transcending love, ecstasy,
bliss, inner light – constitutes evidence in support of their traditional beliefs, because their beliefs are
logically incompatible with one another. A deeper principle must be at work”. (my highlighting).
§ This is exactly what I have been trying to emphasize at this website.
§ In the next very paragraph, he says what he found that deeper principle to be: “That principle is
the subject of this book: The feeling that we call “I” is an illusion” (p. 9). This is probably the
“no-self” theory that is erroneously presented as Buddha’s concept of “anatta”; see, “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ However, on that same page, he also summarizes most of my own conclusions about religions
in general, including “Buddhism” the way as it is practiced by most in both Theravāda and
Mahayana sects.
4. I am just going to quote the relevant sentences from pp. 9-10: “I am often asked what will replace
religion. The answer, I believe, is nothing and everything. Nothing need replace its ludicrous and
divisive doctrines….But what about love, compassion, moral goodness, and self-transcendence?
Many people will imagine that religion is the true repository of their virtues. To change this we must
talk about the full range of human experience in a way that is as free as the best science already is”.
§ And through the rest of the book he does go through that process. I agree with most of it, except
of course that while “Buddhism” may be a religion, Buddha Dhamma is certainly not (if
religion is defined as one providing salvation via following set rituals or having blind faith in
an entity or a supreme being).
5. The key to Mr. Harris not understanding of Buddha Dhamma becomes apparent on p. 28: “We can
also grant that Eastern wisdom has not produced societies or political institutions that are any better
than their Western counterparts. In fact, one could argue that India has survived as the world’s
largest democracy only because of institutions that were built under British rule. Nor has the East led
the world in scientific discovery. Nevertheless, there is something to the notion of uniquely Eastern
wisdom, and most of it has been concentrated in or derived from the tradition of Buddhism”.
§ The problem here is that Mr. Harris has not had exposure to Buddha Dhamma, the “non-
religious” original teachings.
§ The focus of Buddha Dhamma, as delivered by the Buddha, was not on enhancing the mundane
life and on building a better society. It was focused on the fact that it is in fact a “waste of time”
to try to build large cities, develop technology, and in general to spend too much time on
“making things better for this life”, because this life is only a brief stop-over in a much longer
journey.
6. If one really understood the key message of the Buddha, one would see that this life is too short to
be “wasted” on such things. This is due to three key foundational aspects of Buddha Dhamma:
§ Human life, even though wrought with some suffering, is the best in all of 31 realms of this
world for attaining Nibbāna; see, the description of the wider world of 31 realms in, “The
Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma”.
§ In the process of rebirth we spend only a tiny amount of time in this life of about 100 years; see,
“Evidence for Rebirth“.
§ And immersing in mundane sense pleasures becomes only a hindrance to attain the “true and
permanent happiness” of Nibbāna; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha”,
and “Nirāmisa Sukha?”.
§ Of course, especially the Mahayana version of “Buddhism”, or even the Theravāda version, has
veered away from this key message of the Buddha.
7. Yet, I must hasten to point out two additional points:
§ The Buddha stated that not everyone is able to comprehend this key message. Thus, for those
who did not wish to pursue Nibbāna, and asked for advice on how to live a moral and fulfilling
family life while enjoying sensual pleasures, he did provide advice. In Chapter IV of Bhikkhu
Bodhi’s popular book, “In the Buddha’s Words” (2005), such advice from different sutta have
been extracted to one place; this book also has other categories separated out like good rebirths,
mind etc.
§ The Buddha never tried to change or influence the political systems that were in place, even
though he praised the democratic system that was in place in the small autonomous region of
Vajji , which was really a republic similar to the one we have now in the United States. Other
than openly criticizing the caste system, he stayed away from politics.
8. I am impressed that Mr. Harris has been able to catch at least a glimmer of the uniqueness in
Buddha Dhamma despite the fact that he has not been exposed to the true teachings of the Buddha:
“Buddhism in particular possesses a literature on the nature of the mind that has no peer in Western
religion or Western science. Some of these teachings are cluttered with metaphysical assumptions
that should provoke our doubts, but many aren’t. And when engaged as a set of hypotheses by which
to investigate the mind and deepen one’s ethical life, Buddhism can be an entirely rational
enterprise” (p. 29).
§ The author is highly impressed with the Buddhist “vipassana” meditation. However, what he
describes in just breath meditation or “samatha meditation”; see, “Bhāvanā (Meditation)”.
9. And he has the concept of Enlightenment (Nibbāna) all wrong (this says a lot about the Mahayana
“Buddhism” that he has been exposed to): “...the state of “full enlightenment” – is generally
described as “omniscient”. Just what this means is open to a fair bit of caviling. But however
narrowly defined, the claim is absurd” (p. 43).
§ To understand the concept of Nibbāna, one must understand the world view of the Buddha as
described in the above mentioned posts, and then one needs to read other posts at this site on
describing Nibbāna (just do a search with the key word Nibbāna at the top right box on
Keyword Search).
10. Interestingly, there is no mention at all about purifying the mind of defilements, which is key to
true Buddhist meditation; see, “The Importance of Purifying the Mind“.
§ I do not blame the author of course, but it is sad to see how far “Buddhism” has veered off from
the original message of the Buddha.
§ It is these three root causes greed, hate, and ignorance (and the counterparts of non-greed, non-
hate, and wisdom) that clarifies the basis of morality that he has puzzled over in two other
books, “The Moral Landscape” (2011) and “Free Will” (2012).
§ As Mr. Harris correctly points out in “The Moral Landscape“, ‘there is no such thing as
Christian or Muslim morality“. There is no “Buddhist morality” either. Morality is universal
and comes out naturally on the basis of benevolence, compassion, and wisdom having
precedence over greed, hate, and ignorance; see, “Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in
Buddhism“.
11. Chapter 2 is on consciousness. The author has a good introduction and his own thinking about
consciousness may be expressed here: “I am sympathetic with those who, like the philosopher Colin
McGinn and the psychologist Steven Pinker, have suggested that perhaps the emergence of
consciousness is simply incomprehensible in human terms” (p. 57).
§Consciousness has also been fully explained by the Buddha. Consciousness is NOT an
emergent property, it is a fundamental entity. I have several introductory posts on
consciousness at the site; see, “What is Consciousness?” and follow-up posts.
§ I hope those who are interested would read the comprehensive description of the mind provided
by the Buddha in the Abhidhamma section of this site, which may not be ready for an
comprehensive analysis for several more months. But there are a few introductory posts there.
12. The rest of the book is about the author’s experience with trying out different types of
meditations. It is too bad that he was not exposed to real Buddhist meditation. On the other hand,
even in countries where the Theravāda Buddhism is practiced, it is the breath meditation that is
widely taught.
§ Overall, I am impressed by the fact that even with the minimum exposure Mr. Harris had to
Buddha Dhamma, he has been able to see there “there is something hidden there”. I am glad to
say that the Buddha did teach a much more deeper doctrine, and I am sure he and many others
in the West will be enthusiastic about finding the true message of the Buddha.
§ The author knows that as an atheist, he was treading into unknown territory in talking about
spiritual experiences: “…….many of my fellow atheists consider all talk of spirituality to be a
sign of mental illness, conscious imposture, or self-deception. This is a problem, because
millions of people have had experiences for which spiritual and mystical seem the only terms
available” (p.11).
§ However, once one understands the true message of the Buddha, one can clearly see that there
is nothing in his doctrine that goes against the beliefs and convictions of most atheists; Buddha
Dhamma describes the Nature’s laws at a fundamental level.
§ The only difference between science and Buddha Dhamma is that science assumes that mind
phenomena can be derived from material phenomena, while in Buddha Dhamma mind is at the
forefront; see, “Philosophy of the Mind“.
13. I encourage those who are interested to read the book because the author has not only
contemplated deeply about the subjects of morality, questions on existence, world religions, etc, but
also has tried to experience different meditation techniques. I only wish he had been exposed to the
true teachings of the Buddha, so that he could perhaps make more stronger statements about the value
of the Buddha Dhamma in addition to finding much more benefits for himself.
9.2.3 “The Language of God” by Francis Collins
Revised August 9, 2019
This is a top-rated book (published in 2007), as apparent from a large number of reviews on Amazon.
The author is a respected scientist and is the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This
post is based on a review that I posted at the Amazon site back in 2012.
§ I have read numerous books trying to find solid arguments for believing in a Creator. The
author has put together the best case he could also using previous ideas of C. S. Lewis and
others. The main points in the book can be summarized as follows (not in the order presented in
the book):
1. God is responsible for the “Big Bang,” i.e., the creation of the universe, and for creating the just
right physical parameters (fine tuning) that enabled human life on planet Earth.
2. The “Intelligent Design” theory needs to be abandoned, since it may damage the case for the
existence of God.
3. Darwin’s theory of evolution does account for leading to the appearance of a “human-like”
creature, even though the theory explains the evolution of more complex animals.
§ Whether this creature further evolved by itself to be human or whether at some point, God
directly instilled conscience to this creature, he leaves it open.
§ Either way, God is responsible for the existence of morality in humans. He prefers to call
“BioLogos,” the theory of “Theistic Evolution.”
4. The existence of “Moral Law” (the ability to differentiate right from wrong) is the fundamental
basis for his belief in God.
5. The issue of “pain and suffering” was a problematic issue for C. S. Lewis, and the present author
also runs into difficulties in addressing it.
My comments are as follows:
1. Proponents of the Big Bang theory say that Big Bang was not just one event, but such events are
supposed to be of frequent occurrence. Thus there is no need to invoke a higher power.
§ Stephen Hawking, whose book “A Brief History of Time” that the author quoted to make a case
for God’s role, has since come out with a new book “The Grand Design” (2010). In that book
he clearly states that the need for a Creator God is no longer there based on new evidence.
§ Also, in the inflationary theory, Big Bangs are occurring all the time, and there is no need to
invoke a fine-tuning of physical parameters; see, “The Beginning of Infinity” by David
Deutsch.
2. Actually “Intelligent Design” is a somewhat better theory than the hypothesis of a God, in the
sense that the proponents of that theory have put forth some formidable arguments for it.
§ Of course, I do not subscribe to that theory (which some say is making a case for a Creator God
without admitting it). However, Collins does not make a better case for the Creator God
hypothesis.
§ The problem with the “Intelligent Design” theory is that of course, the question arises as to how
that designer came into being! That is why many people say it is the same as the God
hypothesis.
§ If anyone is interested in learning about the “Intelligent Design” theory, a good book is
“Signature in the Cell” by Stephen Meyer (2009).
3. The big question here is “wherein this sequence did the God instill moral values in the evolving
creature?”. Is there a clear-cut transition from a robotic animal to a human with moral values?
§ The “uniqueness of a human” according to the author, is the ability to know right from wrong.
Humans indeed have this quality stronger than in animals. Some animals also have at least a
glimpse of this quality. If you have a pet, especially a dog, you know that it has feelings and
even its mind to do things, i.e., it is not like a robot.
§ While people sometimes sacrifice their own lives to save others, there are also people like
Hitler and Pol Pot who have committed unmentionable atrocities. And that was with planning
(not just on impulse).
§ In Buddha Dhamma, both moral and immoral choices are in the “human psyche”; based on
many complex factors (sansāric habits or “gati”, family, friends, and associates, etc) people
choose to be moral or immoral at different times depending on the situation. Of course, greed,
hate, and ignorance play a big role; see, “Living Dhamma“.
4. Now on the existence of “moral law”: From #3 it is clear that even though morality is in human
psyche, it does not have a “binding effect” on humans. Humans are, in general, more “moral” than
animals. But within the wider world described by the Buddha Dhamma, there are other sentient
beings (devas and brahmas) who are more “moral” than humans.
§ If the man is to be judged by just one life, why is it that everyone not given the same chance
(including “same morality”)? People are born poor, rich, healthy, unhealthy, etc., and some die
even before getting a chance to prove their worthiness.
§ These apparent “vagaries of life” are a strong argument for the case that this life is only one of
many. Furthermore, by the diversity that we observe is due to the effects of past actions
(kamma vipāka); see, “Vagaries of Life and the Way to seek “Good Rebirths.”
§ The basis of morality (as well as immorality) comes out naturally in Buddha Dhamma; see,
“Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in Buddhism“.
5. Of course, the issue of “pain and suffering” — not only in this life but in the cycle of rebirths — is
the fundamental problem of existence according to Buddha Dhamma.
§ Again, the issue of “pain and suffering” is unexplainable by any approach that is based on
just one life. Just like modern science, Buddha Dhamma has a foundation in “causes and
effects.” Suffering — as well as happiness — arises due to past causes, and since most of these
effects (e.g., disability at birth, poverty) are even apparent at birth, “past” means past lives.
9.2.4 “Spark” by John Ratey
Early post of 2014; revised August 28, 2019
1. There is a good book, “Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain” by John
J. Ratey (2013). It discusses new findings on the effects of regular exercise on the brain as well as the
body. (Most of the books I review are likely to be available at public libraries).
2. The book discusses how exercise can keep the brain working at higher efficiency and lower stress
and anxiety. Also, regular exercise can rid of addictions, and even Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder, ADHD. It also talks about women’s hormonal changes and aging too.
3. The key is to engage in a moderate exercise program up to 6 days a week. And to ratchet it up to
high-intensity once-in-a-while, even for a minute at a time. For example, if you jog, try to run fast for
30 seconds to 1 min once-in-awhile. That is called “interval running.”
§ The maximum heart rate for a person is 220-AGE.
§ low-intensity exercise: 55%-65% of max rate
§ moderate: 65%-75%
§ high intensity: 75%-90%
4. There are “wristwatch type” heart rate monitors available. But you basically “know” when you are
at low intensity (walking), moderate (jogging/slow running), and high (dashing to catch a bus or
running a 100-meter race).
§ Should not do high intensity unless you have been active for a while.
§ In the anaerobic range (high intensity), the brain releases human growth hormones (HGH).
That is a natural way to “get high.”
§ Even low-intensity workouts release many other beneficial chemicals. But in high-intensity
workouts, they all get a boost. All these are good for the sustenance/growth of neurons so that
your memory can be improved.
§ But should not do high-intensity regularly unless one is in great shape.
§ He also mentions yoga as an enjoyable activity. Any exercise, i.e., just walking, is better than
none.
§ He discusses how children in a school district in PA are avoiding obesity and health problems
and getting good grades because the schools have good exercise programs.
§ I find that the best time to meditate is after a good workout and a shower. The body and the
mind are refreshed and alert.
5. We are born with a body and a mind that are results of specific kamma vipāka in the past. But we
are not bound by either; we can improve both. That does not mean we should try to “beautify” the
body; we should make it healthy. The physical body is a “temporary shell” that will be with us for
about 100 years, and if we do not take care of it, that will lead to much discomfort.
§ We can make conditions conducive to get “good kamma seeds” and to prevent “bad kamma
seeds” from bearing fruits; see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya.” Do not be discouraged
by those Pāli words. The post is easy to understand.
6. Exercise and meditate! That is key to a long healthy life as well for “cooling down” in the sense of
getting some long-lasting peace-of-mind or attaining one of the four stages of Nibbāna.
§ As we get old, it is imperative to keep both body and mind in good condition. It is hard to
concentrate, let alone meditate, with an aching body or a defiled mind.
§ Walking a mile or two a day can keep one reasonably healthy. For the mind, solving word
puzzles or reading a book is better than watching television.
9.2.5 “The Life of the Buddha” by Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli
October 13, 2018
1. “The Life of the Buddha” by Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli is good to read and even to keep as a reference
(page numbers quoted are for the 2001 First BPS Pariyatti edition). It is a good book for two reasons:
§ A chronological record of the Buddha’s life (after the Buddhahood),
§ Detailed accounts of events that are not in the suttas (taken from the Vinaya Pitaka).
2. The Buddha said that if there is any doubt or a concept that is not clear, one should check with
sutta, vinaya, and dhamma. These basically refer to the Tipiṭaka (three baskets) of Sutta Pitaka,
Vinaya Pitaka, and Abhidhamma Pitaka.
§ Most people just refer to the Sutta Pitaka and forget about the other two. Abhidhamma Pitaka is
a bit hard to understand, and without a firm grasp of basics it is harder.
§ Most people think that the Vinaya Pitaka is just for the bhikkhus and bhikkhunis. But there are
sections in the Vinaya Pitaka that have details that are not in the suttas. Furthermore, those
sections in the Vinaya Pitaka are easy to understand, as we see below.
3. I will provide the following as an example of what is in this book that is not available in any sutta.
It describes in detail how the five ascetics attained the Sotāpanna stage over several days with the
delivery of the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta.
Here is a direct quote from p. 45 of the book (starting from the point where the Buddha had just
finished the first delivery of the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta):
“Then Aññata Koṇḍañña, who had seen and reached and found and penetrated the Dhamma, whose
uncertainties were left behind, whose doubts had vanished, who had gained perfect confidence and
become independent of others in the Teacher’s Dispensation (My Comment: i.e., became a
Sotāpanna), said to the Blessed One: “Blessed One, I wish to go forth under the Blessed One and to
receive the full admission?”
“Come, bhikkhu” the Blessed One said, “The Dhamma is well proclaimed. Live the holy life for the
complete ending of suffering.” And that was his full admission.
Then the Blessed One taught and instructed the rest of the bhikkhus with talk on the Dhamma. As he
did so, there arose in the venerable Vappa and the venerable Bhaddiya, the spotless, immaculate
§ One could get to the Sotāpanna stage ONLY BY fully understanding the concepts discussed in
a major sutta like the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta.
9. A related key point is that upon attaining the Buddhahood, the Buddha wondered whether the
humans will ever be able to understand the deep Dhamma he had just uncovered.
§ This is stated on p. 37 of this book. The Buddha was really doubtful whether humans will be
able to comprehend his Dhamma, and Brahma Sahampati made an invitation to the Buddha
saying that there are many beings in the world who can understand Buddha Dhamma. He would
know, because he had become an Anāgāmi by listening to Dhamma by a previous Buddha.
§ So, the point is that if one thinks one can make progress on the Path by just chanting suttas or
even learning the word-by-word translations, one would be very much mistaken.
§ In some cases, it can take a book to really do justice in explaining a single verse in some of
the deep suttas!
§ However, there are some long suttas, especially in the Digha Nikāya, that can be translated
word-by-word for the most part, since there may not be any deep concepts discussed there.
10. Another good aspect of the book is that it provides the background for the delivery of some major
suttas or verses.
§ For example, there is a detailed account (pp. 55-60) of how the Buddha had to perform even a
few miracles to convince Uruvela Kassapa, his two brother, and 1000 of their followers before
they agreed to listen to the Aditta Pariyaya Sutta or the Fire Sermon.
§ So, we can see that it was very difficult in those early days for the Buddha to even convince
some of the ascetics who had their own beliefs of what Nibbāna was about.
11. The subsequent chapters provide a good chronological account of what happened until the
Parinibbāna. One can get a sense of which major suttas were delivered at around what time.
§ There are accounts on the two chief disciples, and short accounts of other important
personalities such as Anathpindika, Angulimāla, Visākha, etc. Chapter 7 describes the
formation of the order of bhikkhunis.
§ Several encounters with the Māra Devaputta are scattered throughout the book.
§ There is one paragraph on p. 109 on how the Buddha visited the Tāvatimsa deva realm and
delivered Abhidhamma. A summary was conveyed to Ven. Sariputta, who expanded it with the
help of his students, to the form that we have today.
§ There is a chapter on Devadatta, which describes events that are not found in suttas. How he
attained (anāriya) jhānās and iddhi (super-normal powers) powers. How he appeared on the lap
of Prince Ajatasattu as a baby using his iddhi powers.
§ It provides a good account of Devadatta’s efforts to take the life of the Buddha, and how he lost
all those super-normal powers and jhānās at the end.
12. There is a relatively long chapter on “The Doctrine”, including the Four Noble Truths and the
Noble Eightfold Path.
§ Then, there is another relatively long chapter on the final year of the life of the Buddha
including Parinibbāna.
§ The final chapter is on the First Buddhist Council (Sangāyanā) that took place 3 months after
the Parinibbāna of the Buddha.
1. One may ask the question: “What does Buddhism have to do with philosophy?”.
The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines philosophy as:
§ the study of ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning of life, etc.
§ a particular set of ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning of life, etc.
§ a set of ideas about how to do something or how to live
§ I hope to make a logical presentation to convince the philosophy community. Please make any
comments/requests, and I will try to address any serious request.
5. Perhaps as important, I want anyone reading the site to appreciate the significance of what the
Buddha told us 2500 years ago. Compared to the pure Dhamma, all philosophical theories are at very
early stages. Any interested reader can learn about the current philosophical arguments (and those
going back to the early Greek philosophers) and then compare with Buddha Dhamma presented at
this site.
6. Within the framework of the Buddha Dhamma all standard philosophical questions have been
answered.
§ These include, “the relation between the brain and mind”, “the nature of death”, “whether we
have free will”, etc. Thomas Nagel’s short book listed below gives an introduction to some of
such topics.
§ Most existing literature on Buddhist philosophy says some of these questions are in the
category of “questions that the Buddha refused to answer”, which itself is an incorrect
statement; see, “Misconceptions on the Topics the Buddha “Refused to Answer”. The Buddha
refused to answer questions posed by a person who was not capable of comprehending the
answers. But he has given the answers in other places.
§ We will discuss how Buddha Dhamma provides answers to these philosophical questions one
by one, as sufficient background material is added to site.
REFERENCES
For those who are interested on the subject, here are some references (both for philosophy in general
and also on “Buddhist philosophy”; not in any particular order). Among those on “Buddhist
philosophy”, I have not read a single book that provides a true description of the Buddha’s world
view.
For those who are not familiar with the subject, I would recommend the first two introductory
books on philosophy:
“What does it all mean?” by Thomas Nagel (1987) – Excellent introductory book and only 100
pages.
“The Making of a Philosopher”, by Colin McGill (2003) – Another excellent introductory book.
“Buddhist Philosophy – Essential Readings”, ed. by William Edelglass and Jay L. Garfield (2009).
“Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations”, by Paul Williams (2009)
“Buddhism as Philosophy”, by Mark Siderits (2007).
“Buddhist Philosophy – A Historical Analysis”, by David J. Kalupahana (1976).
“Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism”, by David J. Kalupahana (1975).
“A History of Buddhist Philosophy”, by David J. Kalupahana (1992).
“Nagarjuna – The Philosophy of the Middle way”, by David J. Kalupahana (1986).
“Causality and Chance in Modern Physics”, by David Bohm (1957).
“Conversations on Consciousness”, by Susan Blackmore (2006) – input from a number of
philosophers.
“Mind – A Brief Introduction”, by John R. Searle (2004).
“The Character of Consciousness”, by David J. Chalmers (2010).
1. One nice thing about Buddha Dhamma is that there are no separate theories for the mind, meaning
of existence, the physical world, or ANYTHING in this world. Thus I can refer to the section on
“Buddha Dhamma” when I talk about the mind, the same way I refer to that section when I discuss
“Dhamma and Science“.
2. There seems to be three basic problems that the philosophers are trying to tackle regarding the
mind (there are many others, but let us start with these):
§ How does the mental experience arise in a physical body? Most scientists and philosophers say
that it originates in the brain, but they have not been able to make the connection. This is the
“mind-body problem”.
§ How can non-physical mental states of consciousness cause something in the physical world?
For example, how can your intention ever cause a movement of your hand? This is the
“problem of mental causation”. Yet, the case for “physicalism” — that everything in this world
is matter-based — is made with this as a premise.
§ Finally, how your thoughts refer to something that is happening (or happened) in a distant city?
This is called the “problem of intentionality”. If you are thousand miles away from home, you
can take “tour” of the home, room by room, in your mind.
3. The philosophers are divided into two camps in addressing the above problems:
§ One camp says the “physical” and “mental” are two distinct realms. They do not think “mental”
can arise from ‘physical”; This camp is mostly religious and attribute the “mental” to the
concept of a “soul”. They are “dualists”.
§ The other camp is ‘materialistic”: they say the ‘mental” arises from “physical”. In the worst
case, some materialists deny even the existence of a mental reality, even though I cannot quite
understand what that means. Because they are obviously thinking about these concepts, which
is “mental”.
4. Let us look at the current status of these two camps:
§ Following the extreme dualism of Rene Descartes, there have been many dualists, including
Stephen Jay Gould whose “non-overlapping magisteria” in the late 1990’s put matter and mind
into non-overlapping disciplines: matter can be handled by science and morality and mind can
be left to religion. However, these days only dualists left seem to be those who hold a dualist
view for religious reasons, i.e., a soul.
§ These days most philosophers are materialists. With the amazing progress of science and
technology, it is hard for most people to believe anything that is not “confirmed’ by science.
And they think science, based on a purely materialistic approach, should be able to explain
everything about ‘this world”. They believe that it is only a matter of time before brain activity
will be able to explain the workings of the mind; see the reference list in “Dhamma and
Philosophy – Introduction“.
§ The inadequacy of the materialist approach is detailed in a comprehensive manner by Thomas
Nagel in his recent book, “Mind and Cosmos” (2012); it is an easy read with no fluff and only
128 pages. I was impressed by how close he came to advocating a “mind first” approach, just
like in Buddha Dhamma (apparently he does not know anything about Buddha Dhamma and
does not even mention it).
5. Mind is the ultimate cause of everything in this world. The Buddha said, “mano pubbangama
dhamma, mano setta manomaya…”. “Mind precedes all dhamma, all dhamma are mind
made…”. But Buddha’s is not a dualist world view. Mind and matter are intimately connected.
§ Most people translate the above Pāli verse as, “mind precedes all mental phenomena….”. So,
we need to examine what “dhamma” means here.
§ Dhamma explains how anything and everything in this world comes about “dhamma” means
“to bear” or “to explain” or “how anything “comes about”. Nothing happens without (multiple)
causes.
§ In the Sabba Sutta, the Buddha clearly defines what “sabba” or “all” that in “in this world”: It
is everything that can be experienced via the five physical senses and the mind. Specifically,
eye and visible objects, ear and sound, nose and smells, tongue and tastes, body and touch, and
the mind and concepts (these are the six internal and corresponding six external “ayatanas“),
this is “the all”.
§ Is there anything that is not included within those 12 ayatanas? There is nothing else in the
whole world that is not included in those 12 ayatanas. Six of those are “internal”; eye, ear,
nose, tongue, body, and mind, and the other six are external, they exist “out there”.
§ Therefore, it is NOT correct to say that “dhamma” in the above verse includes only mental
phenomena, as many translators of the suttas have done. This is why I keep saying that we need
to check consistency all the time. If one thing is not defined properly, then that error propagates
and lead to contradictions.
§ This “all” can also be expressed as the 31 realms of existence; of those 31 realms, normal
humans experience only two realms (human and animal); see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma”. But it is possible to experience other realms via developing mental power, i.e.,
jhānas: see, “Power of the Human Mind – Introduction” and the follow-up posts. Thus, the
Buddha’s world view is much more expansive than the ones that are subjected to current
scientific and philosophical investigations.
6. According to Buddha Dhamma, the ultimate realities in this world are just 28 types of rūpa
(matter), citta, and 52 types of cetasika. Then different combinations of the cetasika in citta gives rise
to 89 (121) types of citta.
§ Of course citta and cetasika constitute the mind, and 28 types of rūpa constitute matter.
§ Another way to state the same thing is in terms of the 6 dhatus: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, akasa
(space), and viññāṇa. The 28 types of rūpa mentioned above (including akasa dhatu) are
derived from the satara mahā bhūta: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo. Viññāṇa constitutes of citta and
cetasika.
§ All inert things and plants in this world (31 realms) are made of rūpa. All sentient beings “are
made of” rūpa and have viññāṇa (citta and cetasika), i.e, a mind.
§ As I will explain in a separate post, rūpa are ultimately caused by the mind; see, “The Origin of
Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“. But rūpa are inherently unstable (this is basically the
root cause for suffering in the material world), and there is a fundamental law in physics which
states the fact that matter is unstable and the universe itself “runs down”; see, “Second Law of
Thermodynamics is Part of Anicca!“.
§ When the mind is released from the material body, one attains Nibbāna, i.e., one is never reborn
“in this world”. It is the material body that is subject to decay and death, and lead to suffering.
7. The reason that I started this website is that it is not possible to provide a reasonable explanation of
the Buddha’s world view in an essay or even in several essays. At the website, I can make references
to related posts. I hope it would be a rewarding experience for anyone who is willing to allocate some
time to read AND contemplate.
§ Another reason to start the website is that I want to have it all out in the open, so anyone can
challenge any inconsistency. I want to find the truth myself, and the only way to do that is to
get as many as possible to look at the emerging picture and make corrections to any errors
anyone can find.
§ Therefore, I would appreciate any comments pointing to any errors or inconsistencies anywhere
on the site, in addition to suggestions for relevant topics to discuss.
§ There is more to follow. This is an introduction.
§ How “physical” arises from “mental” in the most fundamental sense is really complex and we
may not get to that for a while. First we will concentrate on how physical bodies of the living
beings arise with causes from the “mental”. I will be building up the Abhidhamma section and
then will refer frequently to that section as we proceed.
8. It is time to make a paradigm change: Consciousness is not only ontologically fundamental, it takes
precedence over matter. Mind can create matter. Right now we have evidence that the mind can
change the brain; see, “Truine Brain – How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits“. If
the brain creates the mind, how can the mind alter the brain?
9. Here are a couple of papers on the subject related to the “mind body problem” for those who are
interested (click on them to open):
WebLink: What is it Like to be a Bat – Nagel (1974)
WebLink: All machine and no ghost- McGinn-2012
Next, “Buddha Dhamma: Non-Perceivability and Self-Consistency“, …………
It is best to learn (or even investigate) Buddha Dhamma with a mindset pretty much the same as
when one is trying to learn about a new concept, say in mathematics or science. There are some key
assumptions (axioms) involved, which cannot be proven, but do make sense especially if one takes
time to contemplate. This is contrary to conventional religions.
1. Merriam-Webster defines “religion” as:
§ the belief in a god or in a group of gods
§ an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods
§ an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group
2. The word “religion” invokes the idea of a Creator God in most people’s minds. Even though this is
correct for most major religions of the world, it is definitely not correct for Buddha Dhamma.
§ The foundation of Buddha Dhamma is that the world has been in existence “forever” (no First
Cause and thus it was not created). Universes come and go, but there have been living beings at
all times.
§ It may first appear to be inconsistent with the current “Big Bang theory” that says our universe
started some 14 billions years ago in a “Big Bang”. In fact, major religions embraced the idea
of a Big Bang when it was first proposed, since it had connotations of creation. However, when
the inflationary theory that describes the Big Bang (proposed in the 1990’s) says there are
multiple, parallel universes. Thus, the hope for a unique “event of creation” fizzled out.
§ Of course “Big Bang theory” is just that, a theory. There are some scientists who do not believe
everything “popped up” all of a sudden in a Big Bang. They believe that universes are cyclic,
i.e., they transform and evolve; see, for example, “”Endless Universe – Beyond the Big Bang”,
by P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok (2007).
3. So, Buddha Dhamma does not count as a religion if one takes the first two definitions from either
Merriam-Webster or Oxford dictionary. Yet, it can be included in the third category.
§ One could say that most major religions are theistic, i.e., based on the belief of a Creator.
§ Buddha Dhamma can be categorized as an atheistic religion, in the sense that there is no
assumption of a Creator. It must be noted that in Buddha Dhamma there are beings called
“devas” (sometimes translated as “gods”) in other realms; they cannot affect our lives in a
significant way, much less than creating universes.
4. However, I prefer to label Buddha Dhamma as the “ultimate science”. It encompasses all of
nature’s laws not only pertaining to matter, but also pertaining to the mind. It is the Grand Unified
Theory that the scientists are striving to discover, but they are only focusing on the material side.
§ Scientists are beginning to realize the importance of the mind. In fact, many scientists are
attempting to make a connection between quantum theory and the mind. This is NOT going to
work, because any “matter-based theory” cannot explain the mind. Mind is the forerunner:
“Manopubbangamā Dhammā..“.
§ As I build the Abhidhamma section, it will become clear why the mind takes precedence over
matter. And it will also become clear why the Buddha is the top-most scientist. He was only
concerned with sharing what he discovered with the others.
§ The “new found knowledge” about innumerable planetary systems existing in our universe was
known to the Buddha and is described in the Tipiṭaka; see, “Dhamma and Science“.
§ The Buddha was not interested in “starting a religion” so that he could be worshipped by the
masses. Instead of residing in many luxurious residences like the Jetavanaramaya in his last
days, he chose to travel by foot to Kusinara enduring many hardships on the way. He wanted to
show that his body was not exempt from suffering.
5. When I listen to current debates between those who believe in a Creator and those who don’t
(atheists), I think the following summarizes the key ideas from each group:
§ Atheists correctly point out that there is no evidence supporting the idea of a Creator God. Our
ancestors could not fathom the workings of our complex world, and envisioned a Creator, who
was supposed to have created the humans and a suitable habitat for them. But many “mysteries”
of our world have been resolved with the advance of science, and in fact, these findings
contradict key ideas in major religions.
§ Those on the other side do not have any “winning points” or scientific evidence, but they insist
that the idea of a “totally physical world” goes against our experiences and innate feelings that
cannot be denied. That there must be something in addition to a physical body, i.e., there is a
“conscious experience” that cannot be attributed to atoms and molecules in our bodies.
6. Buddha Dhamma encompasses both these key points. First, on the side of the atheists, there is no
need for a Creator. Natural processes can account for not only what happens on Earth, but an
uncountable number of habitable planetary systems in a vast universe.
§ On the other hand, science can account for only how the material world evolves. There is
something other than inert matter in this world as the theologians argue, and that is
consciousness. Consciousness cannot be derived from inter matter. There are six elemental
entity types in this world: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo, akasa (space), and viññāṇa (consciousness).
Consciousness thus cannot be derived from other five. The first four have deeper meanings than
just earth, water, fire, and wind; we will discuss this in a future post.
§ However, consciousness was not imparted by a Creator. Furthermore, contrary to what most
theologians believe, animals are conscious too (even though their consciousness is at a lower
level compared to humans).
§ This is why one could say Buddha Dhamma is an “atheistic religion”, within a narrow context.
7. Some people tell me that Buddha Dhamma is not that different from other religions because there
are certain “assumptions” that need to be believed “on faith”, for example, that there is a rebirth
process. In fact, it is true that “not believing in the possibility of a rebirth process” is a wrong view
that could make one eligible to be born in the lower four realms or the apāyas where suffering is
much more compared to in the human realm; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
§ However, the axiom of a rebirth process is not be taken as a tenet, like in the case of the Ten
Commandments; it is up to oneself to examine and accept or reject that concept. Even a Buddha
cannot make anyone be “forced to believe” in anything.
§ Thus, there is a difference in what is meant by “faith” in Buddha Dhamma, compared to that in
theistic religions. In any theistic religion, one has to accept the idea of a Creator without
question; it is THE basis of any major theistic religion.
§ Buddha Dhamma just describes the nature of this world; this The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma has some basic axioms just like geometry or the theory of relativity. These
“assumptions” can be verified to be correct if one takes time to examine the evidence.
§ One could start off by not embracing these basic assumptions, but not rejecting them outright
either. One could keep an open mind and explore the key ideas in Buddha Dhamma and decide
for oneself whether those assumptions start to make sense as one proceeds.
§ In fact, accepting such assumptions on blind faith will not do any good for anyone. One has to
comprehend WHY those HAVE TO BE correct in order to make sense of this world that we
live in. One has to spend time and critically evaluate the key concepts in Buddha Dhamma.
8. Buddha dhamma based on some key axioms like the rebirth process and the existence of other
types of beings in 29 more realms (other than the human and animal realms), has the explanatory
power to explain anything in this world, ranging from the existence of innumerable planetary systems
(which was only accepted within the past few hundred years by science) to how morality comes about
without a Creator; see, “Dhamma and Science” and “Origin of Morality (and Immorality) in
Buddhism“.
§ It may take me another year or two to get the more deeper concepts explained, but I think there
is enough material at the site to see that the knowledge of the Buddha (who was a human being
just like us) cannot be matched by any other human. It took us the workings of many brilliant
scientists from Galileo to Newton to Einstein to realize the vastness of this universe, which the
Buddha described 2500 years ago.
§ But the even more astounding fact is that the Buddha described in detail how the consciousness
arises in a living being, in addition to describing the material world. Science is still under the
“wrong view” that consciousness can arise in the brain out of inert matter. I am just beginning
to layout the basics of Abhidhamma that have been hidden in the past several hundred years,
and have been revealed by a very special Thero in Sri Lanka.
§ Whenever possible, I try make connections to current findings in science, and to show the new
confirmations as well the wrong concepts still embraced by science. Time will reveal that
Buddha Dhamma, in its pure form, cannot be refuted. I have started to add the date of posting
of essays, so that we can keep track of these predictions over the coming years.
§ And there are no “mysteries” in Buddha Dhamma, even though some concepts are still not
amenable to science.
9. I just read the recently published book, “Life on the Edge” by Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-
Khalili (2014) which describes how scientists are slowly, but surely, revealing many “mysteries of
nature”. These are all consistent with Buddha Dhamma, and I can point out a couple of “possible
future breakthroughs”.
§ Scientists will be able to extend the lifespans of humans. There is no set limit to human lifetime
in Buddha Dhamma, with lifetimes extending to thousands of years at times.
§ It may even be possible to make conditions in a laboratory (chemical concoctions) that allows a
lifeform to arise. This does NOT mean that scientists will be able to CREATE LIFE. Buddha
Dhamma describes how animals and humans can exist in the “gandhabba state” until a suitable
conditions for it to start building a physical body become available; see, “Manomaya Kāya“.
When a human baby is conceived, for example, what happens is that a matching “gandhabba”
taking possession of the zygote in the womb or even out in the laboratory; see, “What does
Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
§ If careful experiments are designed, it will be possible to demonstrate even now that small
insects “can be born” out of decaying leaves; what happens is that decaying leaves lead to the
formation of the “seed” (right chemical concoction) necessary for a “gandhabba” of that insect
species to start a new physical body.
10. For those who would like to look into arguments on why theistic religions do not make sense,
below is a compilation of arguments by Sam Harris, a prominent atheist.
§ By the way, Buddha Dhamma does not agree with some of the positions of Mr. Harris (issues
on how consciousness arises, as we discussed in #9 above). For example, at the end of the video
(last several minutes) he talks about human embryos not being qualified as “human”, i.e., there
is no life there. There Mr. Harris says a zygote is the same as any other trillions of cells in a
body. That is not even consistent with modern science.
§ Modern science has not pinpointed when life begins in a zygote; see, “What does Buddha
Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“. This is why I am saying that science is
incomplete; it does not know about the “gandhabba state” of a human discussed in #9 above.
By the way, a “gandhabba” is not a soul; see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the
Manomaya Kāya?“. I have other posts at the site that provide more details, but it may not be for
another year or so until all the details are presented.
§ With regard to the mind, science is still at the same stage that it was 500 years ago regarding
the material world, i.e., when most people thought stars were embedded in a celestial sphere
around the Earth; see, “Dhamma and Science“.
Please note : The video seems to start around 43 minutes into the presentation. You may need to
manually reset to the start of the video.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Best Sam Harris Arguments - 2 Hour Compilation! - Debate, Interview, and
Lecture Footage
July 15, 2017; Revised February 5, 2018 (link at the end of the post)
This question was posed to me by Mr. C. Saket from India, who also sent along his ideas too.
Apparently, this question has been discussed in several online forums, without reaching a satisfactory
answer.
1. The question is: “The Buddha has said that there is no discernible beginning to the rebirth process
(see the suttas in WebLink: suttacentral: Anamatagga Saṃyutta, Saṃyutta Nikāya). In other words,
we have had infinite number of attempts at attaining Nibbāna. So, why have we not attained Nibbāna
yet?”
§ This question seems to have its origin in the WebLink: WIKI: infinite monkey theorem, which
states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of
time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
§ By the way, this infinite monkey theorem is another evidence of how unimaginably large
infinity is: “Infinity – How Big Is It?“.
2. First of all, the proof of the monkey theorem is based on a monkey generating random characters
using a keyboard. The following example is given in the above link to the monkey theorem:
§ Suppose the typewriter has 50 keys, and the word to be typed is banana. If the keys are pressed
randomly and independently, it means that each key has an equal chance of being pressed.
Then, the chance that the first letter typed is ‘b’ is 1/50, and the chance that the second letter
typed is a is also 1/50, and so on. Therefore, the chance of the first six letters spelling banana is
(1/50) × (1/50) × (1/50) × (1/50) × (1/50) × (1/50) = (1/50)6 = 1/15 625 000 000 ,
less than one in 15 billion, but not zero, hence a possible outcome.
§ Let us first discuss the differences between the infinite monkey theorem and the current
problem. However, at the end it will be shown that the conclusion of the infinite monkey
theorem does apply to the present case too, and there is no contradiction even though infinite
number of beings have not yet attained Nibbāna.
§ The key point is that an infinite number of beings have attained Nibbāna. This is why infinity is
such a complex concept.
3. Attaining Nibbāna is NOT a random process. First of all, one needs to hear or read about the
Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta) in order to even start on the process.
§ No matter how hard one tries, one will never be able to attain Nibbāna if one has not heard the
TRUE VERSION of the Tilakkhaṇa. In some eons (mahā kalpa, lasting roughly 10 billions
years), there is not even a single Buddha, and the probability of attaining Nibbāna during that
eon is ZERO.
§ Even during a given Buddha Sāsana, the true meanings of the Tilakkhaṇa get distorted from
time to time and thus the probability goes to zero. For example, at present time, most people
interpret anicca as impermanent and anatta as “no-self”.
4. There have been only 7 Buddhas within the past 91 mahā kalpas. This timeline is discussed in the
“WebLink: WIKI: suttacentral: Mahapadana Sutta (DN 14)“.
§ There was only a single Buddha (Vipassi) in the mahā kalpa that was 91 mahā kalpa earlier.
There were no Buddhas in the next 60 mahā kalpas, and then two Buddhas (Siki and Vessabhu)
appeared. Then there were 30 mahā kalpas without a single Buddha, and so far in the current
mahā kalpa there have been four Buddhas (Kakusanda, Konagama, Kassapa, Gotama), and one
more Buddha (Maithree) is expected to appear before this eon ends.
§ Even during a given Buddha Sāsana, only a fraction of HUMANS will get to hear/read about
the true Tilakkhaṇa. Today, the percentage of Buddhists worldwide is roughly 5%-10%, and
much less than 1% have heard about the true Tilakkhaṇa.
§ Furthermore, the human population is negligible compared to the population of beings in the
apāyas, who have zero probability of comprehending Tilakkhaṇa. So, we can see that there are
many zero probabilities for a given LIVING BEING, compared to a relatively few non-zero
probabilities.
5. We can refine the progress to Nibbāna a bit more. The key to Nibbāna is first to attain the
Sotāpanna stage; once that is reached, Arahanthood is guaranteed. It is mostly only in the human
realm that one will be able to attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ In order to attain the Sotāpanna stage, one first needs get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi;
see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“. Only then one will be able to
comprehend the Tilakkhaṇa and start on the Noble Eightfold Path to attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Suppose one is born human during the time of a Buddha, having gotten rid of the 10 types of
micchā diṭṭhi, makes good progress towards the Sotāpanna stage. But if, for some reason,
he/she is unable to reach the Sotāpanna stage (i.e., without grasping Tilakkhaṇa) and dies, then
even if the next birth is in the human realm, one could be born to a family with micchā diṭṭhi
and thus may have to start over.
§ We do carry our “gathi” from life-to-life. “Good gathi” can grow in the next life under
conducive conditions, but they can also be reversed or changed under adverse conditions.
§ We can call such an occurrence an “event with significant probability”.
6. Therefore, reaching Nibbāna cannot be considered a mechanical process, and thus cannot be
compared to a monkey hitting arbitrary keys on a keyboard to generate Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
§ One has to make a concerted effort — via several intermediate stages — to reach Nibbāna.
§ However, a mathematician could still say that one could consider an infinite number of such
“events with significant probability” by a living being per #5 above.
§ One such “event with significant probability” can be equated to a monkey hitting a key stroke
on the keyboard.
§ Even though such “events with significant probability” may be separated by huge time spans,
given infinite time, an infinite number of them can accumulate. Therefore, the infinite
monkey theorem should still hold.
7. It is indeed true that an infinite number of living beings HAVE ATTAINED Nibbāna in the past.
§ Not only that, infinite number of living beings have attained the Buddhahood in the past. Of
course, attaining the Buddhahood is infinitely more difficult than attaining Arahanthood.
§ Therefore, the infinite set of living beings who have attained Nibbāna is “much larger” than the
infinite set of living beings who have attained the Buddhahood.
8. Infinity is a very complex concept. There are many levels of infinity. Infinity minus infinity is still
infinity. So, even as there have been an infinite number of Buddhas, and and even higher infinity of
those who attained the Arahanthood, there are still an infinite number of living beings (including us)
who have not yet attained Nibbāna.
§ Therefore, while the infinite monkey theorem does apply here, there is no contradiction.
§ Of course, several other questions now arise: Where do all these infinite number of living
beings live? Do they all live in our Solar system? Have all these infinite number of Buddhas
appeared in our Solar system? It will take many more future posts to fully explain these, but we
can summarize as follows.
9. There are 31 realms that are associated with our Earth or the Solar system (Cakkāvāta or
Cakrāvāta), see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma – Introduction“. So, there are many more
living beings in our Cakkāvāta other than the humans and animals that we can actually see; most
living beings are in the other three realms of the apāyas; animal realm is the fourth.
§ Furthermore, there are an infinite number of such Cakkāvāta (planetary systems) in existence at
all times with living beings. Buddhas can appear in some of them.
§ These Cakkāvāta are in clusters of small, medium, and large “world systems” (galaxies, galaxy
clusters, and superclusters in terms of modern science). But none is permanent. They come into
being and eventually perish, only to reborn again. Just like us, these world systems also
undergo death and rebirth; it is a cyclic process. We will discuss this at a later time.
§ Within the past 100 years or so, scientists have confirmed the existence of billions of planetary
systems within each galaxy and billions of such galaxies in our universe. As far as science is
concerned, the number of Cakkāvāta (planetary systems) is likely to be infinite — as stated by
the Buddha 2500 years ago.
10. If there are infinite number of planetary systems with life (just like ours), how come that scientists
have not detected life outside our Solar system?
§ The distance between adjacent Cakkāvāta is enormous. The star closest to us, Proxima
Centauri, is 4.2 light years away from us. This means, if we travel at the speed of light (186,000
miles/second), it will take 4.2 years to get there! Of course, we can only travel at a small
fraction of the speed of light.
§ For comparison, our own Sun is only 8 “light minutes” away from the Earth, i.e., it takes only 8
minutes to get to the Sun if we travel at the speed of light. The moon is about 1.3 light-seconds
away from the Earth (240,000 miles). We have been able to only land on the Moon so far!
§ So, it is fair to say that we may not be able to communicate with living beings in another
planetary system in the near future, if ever. Even if we find that our closest star has a habitable
planet like Earth, it will take over 8 years to even send a light signal and get a reply back.
11. This is why the Buddha said not to waste time on thinking about these questions. In the WebLink
WIKI: suttacentral: Acinteyya Sutta (AN 4.77), he listed four things that are inconceivable
(acinteyya) by a human, and if one persists on that path one may become insane (may lose one’s
mind, because these issues are so complex):
§ Buddha Visaya (things that are discernible to a Buddha), Jhāna Visaya (powers that can be
accessed by one in jhānās), Kamma Vipāka (how the laws of kamma work), and Loka Cintā
(comprehending the real nature of the world).
§ The issue that we just discussed belongs to the fourth category. We will never be able to figure
out or comprehend everything about the unimaginably large and complex world (the universe).
But from the above discussion, hopefully we all can at least get a glimpse of the complexity of
the universe with infinite number of Cakkāvāta like ours.
February 5, 2018: An update on this subject can be found at the Discussion Forum topic, “The
Infinity problem – BIG Doubt“.
Introduction
1. Free will is at the core of Buddhism (Buddha Dhamma). If one does not have free will, one would
not be able to attain Nibbāna.
§ In a mundane sense also, the applicability of free will should be obvious. Free will is what
determines (within certain limits) whether one will become a successful businessman or a
master thief.
§ When I said “within limits”, we can only compare situations for two people who are born with
comparable capabilities. For example, one born with an “ahetuka birth” (born with brain
defects) will never be able to achieve much success.
§ However, a person born with a “normal level of intelligence” (tihetuka or dvihetuka births) can
make decisions that can lead to a wide variety of possible outcomes in the future. For example,
one could become a great scientist or a ruthless dictator. Both require a “sharp mind”.
2. In the following video by Sam Harris, we can clearly see where modern philosophers get stuck on
the issue of free will.
WebLink: youtube: Sam Harris on the Illusion of Free Will
§ He agrees that things happen due to causes, but he cannot figure out the causes for many things.
He says, “you don’t pick your parents, you don’t pick your body…”. But we do. That is
explained with paṭicca samuppāda in Buddha Dhamma. We even choose our rebirths too;
see, “Uppatti Paṭicca Samuppāda (How We Create Our Own Rebirths)“.
§ As long as he does not believe in rebirth, Sam Harris will never be able to understand those
“missing causes”. The rebirth picture provides those “missing causes”. Laws of kamma
(causes and effects) operate over many rebirths. One cannot analyze the current life in
isolation.
§ Furthermore, we need to include animals and beings in other 29 realms too, in order to
fully explain the laws of kamma.
§ Nature treats every single living being fairly, according to what they have done in the past.
§ One is born into a given existence (human, animal, deva, etc), a given family (good, bad), under
different conditions (healthy, handicapped, poor, etc), and so on based on one’s gati. One’s gati
are based on the types of saṅkhāra that one cultivates (basically how one thinks, speaks,
and acts).
3. Continuing with the key points in #2: Another other key point is that “kammic energy” that lead
to future vipāka (results) are generated in one’s javana citta. Don’t be put off by that word. Javana
citta are basically thoughts that arise in one’s mind when one is generating conscious thoughts about
speaking/doing moral or immoral deeds.
§ Vacī and kāya saṅkhāra become abhisaṅkhāra (strong saṅkhāra) that can lead to future
vipāka, ONLY IF those actions or speech is either moral (good vipāka) or immoral (bad
vipāka).
§ That is the difference between saṅkhāra and abhisaṅkhāra; see, “Saṅkhāra – What It Really
Means“.
4. Vacī saṅkhāra are responsible for our speech (either out loud or just to ourselves). When we do
something (walk, play, etc) we move our bodies with kāya saṅkhāra that arise in the mind (basically
in the gandhabba). We have control over both those.
§ On the other hand, when thoughts arise automatically due to a sense input, those are mano
saṅkhāra.
§ That is the difference between mano saṅkhāra (which arise without our DIRECT control) and
vacī saṅkhāra/kāya saṅkhāra (which we have control over).
§ Whether just saṅkhāra or abhisaṅkhāra, this distinction holds. For example, we can stop saying
anything anytime. We can stop raising our hand anytime we want to, whether it is to say “Hi”
to someone (saṅkhāra) or to hit someone (abhisaṅkhāra).
5. As we have discussed before, the word “saṅkhāra” comes from “san” + “khāra” or actions that
involve “san“; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Samsāra)“.
§ “San” are responsible for just getting things done to live the current life (even everyday
activities).
§ However, if they involve moral/immoral actions that can bring results (vipāka) in future
lives, then those arise due to “strong san” or “abhi san” and thus become “abhisaṅkhāra“.
§ Kamma are actions (done with saṅkhāra that arise in the mind). Most are neutral kamma:
They do not bring significant vipāka.
§ Those moral or immoral strong kamma — done with abhisaṅkhāra — are the ones that lead to
kamma vipāka in the future (either in this life or in future lives).
§ We don’t really experience those initial mano saṅkhāra and we only experience when it
comes to the next stage called vacī saṅkhāra (“talking to oneself”).
§ This is an important point. Even if one does not say a word, when one is “thinking to oneself”
that is called vacī saṅkhāra. If one gets really interested, one may speak out and that is still a
vacī saṅkhāra.
§ If one’s interest builds up, one may even take bodily action. Those bodily actions are done with
kāya saṅkhāra that arise in the mind.
§ I strongly urge everyone to re-read the posts: “Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna” and
“Correct Meaning of Vacī Saṅkhāra“.
§ The strength of kammic energy created increases in the following order: mano, vacī, kāya
saṅkhāra.
§ We should stop any bad actions that we are about to do and continue with any good actions.
That is the basis of Satipaṭṭhāna and Ānāpāna meditations.
§ All we need to do is to cultivate the habit of “catching one’s response early enough”. “Being
mindful” is just that; see, “6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)” and “Maha Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta“.
12. If one can understand the post, “Difference Between Taṇhā and Upādāna“, one can not only see
that free will is “built-in” for humans, but one will also be able to see how one can purify one’s mind
and make progress on the Noble Path.
§ As explained in that post — and the reference posts mentioned there — only mano saṅkhāra
arise without our control.
§ We have total control over vacī and kāya saṅkhāra, at least when one gets better in practicing
Satipaṭṭhāna/Ānāpāna.
§ This is also why humans are different from animals: Humans have the ability to think for
themselves and make rational decisions.
13. Scientists misinterpret the experiments on the famous “Libet experiments” simply because they
believe that the mind resides in the brain. Therefore, they wrongly conclude that the “brain activity
starts” before one makes a decision; see, “Neuroscience says there is no Free Will? – That is a
Misinterpretation!“.
§ Libet experiment is very simple: A person was asked to move his/her own finger whenever at
his/her will, and scientists monitored that person’s brain activity. They concluded that the brain
started the “finger moving” process before the person made the decision to move the finger!
§ If the brain indeed started the decision making process, that would confirm that humans do not
have free will. But then the question arises what triggered that brain activity? Of course,
scientists or philosophers do not have an answer to that question. If human decisions are
random, this world would be a very chaotic place.
§ However, the explanation is simple with the concept of a mental body (gandhabba) controlling
the physical body with the help of the brain.
§ As explained in the above post, the decision in made by the gandhabba and that started the
brain activity. Scientists did not correctly monitor the time at which the person made the
decision, because their “model” was incorrect.
14. Gandhabba or the “mental body” or the “manomaya kāya” is a key concept that has been
neglected in even the current Theravada texts. This concept is ironically somewhat similar to the
“ghost in the machine” concept; see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
§ There are several subsections at the website that discuss this concept: “Mental Body –
Gandhabba“, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“, and “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“.
XI Bhāvanā (Meditation)
The numbered posts are to be read in that order. Even for those who are practicing Buddhists, I
recommend starting at the Introduction (#1), and going down the list of topics at least the first time.
§ It would be a good idea to read the posts in the following subsection at some point, in order to
get an idea about the reasoning behind this approach: “Essential Buddhism“.
o 1. Introduction to Buddhist Meditation
o 2. The Basics in Meditation
o 3. The Second Level
o 4. What do all these Different Meditation Techniques Mean?
o 5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness Meditation)
o 6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)
o 7. What is Änapāna?
o Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?
o 8. The Basic Formal Ānāpānasati Meditation
o Possible Effects in Meditation – Kundalini Awakening
o 9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati)
§ Introduction to Character or Personality (Gathi)
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects. They can clarify unresolved
questions, and lead to samādhi. But one must contemplate on them.
§ The “traditional method” for achieving some “cooling down” or “calming sensation” is to do
“breath meditation” or “kasina meditation.” As I questioned in several posts, how can the
greed, hate, or ignorance be removed via concentrating on one’s breath or some kasina
object? Such meditation techniques DO NOT remove ignorance and only SUPPRESS greed
and hatred.
§ We need to start gradually reducing greed and hate from our minds; this called
“sīla” (pronounced “seela”) or moral living. Then one’s mind becomes clear, and one starts
feeling the nirāmisa sukha. Then it will become easier to grasp Dhamma concepts and get rid of
avijjā.
§ Buddha Dhamma is for the wise; it is not to be followed by blind faith but with understanding.
One needs to learn and “see” Dhamma first. A sustained “Cooling down” cannot be attained via
following a set procedure like watching the breath.
§ One could go a long way (up to the Sotāpanna stage) just by learning Dhamma and
comprehending the key concepts. When one grasps the key concepts, it begins dawn on oneself
that it does not make sense to be too greedy. Or to hate someone with a level of hatred that
makes one’s heart to “heat up” to uncomfortable degrees.
§ Thus through a better understanding of Dhamma (i.e., removing ignorance), one automatically
“cools down.” Removing ignorance via learning Dhamma leads automatically to reducing
greed and hate.
Correct World View is Critical
4. That is why “Sammā Diṭṭhi” or “Correct Vision” comes first in the Noble Eightfold Path. Actually
“sammā” means “san” + “ma” or “removing defilement”; but for brevity, we will use the word
“correct”. But keep in mind that “sammā diṭṭhi” means “removing defilement through correct
vision.” I cannot emphasize enough the importance of learning Dhamma. That is the first BIG step.
Without understanding the message of the Buddha, how can one follow his Path?
§ When one starts to understand the key Dhamma concepts, one regularly tend to think about
such ideas and how they should be kept in mind while going through daily chores. That is
“sammā saṅkappa” or “correct concepts.” That automatically lead to “sammā vācā” (correct
speech), “sammā kammanta” (correct action), sammā ājīva (correct livelihood).
§ With those five steps, one becomes attuned to correct mindfulness (“sammā sati”). Yes. There
is “incorrect mindfulness” (“micchā sati,” pronounced “michchā sathi”) too, like when a master
thief plans a robbery. One needs to be “engaged” or focused accomplishing any task, either
good or bad.
§ With cultivated “sammā sati,” one will be able to “see” the consequences of any action very
quickly. Then one can decide whether to go ahead with it (since only good can come out of that
action) or to abandon it (because it is not good for oneself or to others).
§ When one sees the benefits of these steps (i.e., “cooling down”) one will be motivated to work
harder on all these steps, i.e., one cultivates “sammā vāyāma” (correct effort).
§ The culmination is “sammā samādhi” (correct calm state of mind). Yes. There is a “micchā
samādhi” too. When that master thief is planning a big robbery, he gets into a kind of samādhi
also. He feels a sense of calm too, but that will have very bad consequences down the road.
§ The latter three develop at the same time. One could get into “sammā samādhi” just via
“sammā diṭṭhi.” When one listens attentively to a Dhamma talk or gets absorbed in reading
about a key Dhamma concept, one could get into “samādhi.” A jhānic state is a deeper samādhi
state.
Reading About Concepts Is Not Enough
5. That is why I recommend everyone to read these posts during a quiet time. One will absorb more
and just by contemplating on the material while reading one could easily get into samādhi. That is
what meditation is all about. “Absorbing the good” will automatically force the “bad” out, and one
gets into samādhi automatically; we will talk about this “ānāpāna” process in the following posts.
§ It will get to the point that one can sit down and get into a jhāna within a minute or two. But
that will take time.
§ I hope you will be able to experience the LONG TERM benefits from the procedures we
discuss in this post and the followup posts. Initially, it will be a bit slow. But if one sticks with
it for a few months, one should be able to see a change in oneself that is not merely a temporary
relief. For some, it will be faster.
6. In this life, we feel two kinds of suffering: bodily pains and aches as well as various diseases and
mental distress (disappointments to depression).
§ Bodily ailments take time to recover. But even those can be reduced by careful planning and
being mindful too. If one engages in physical activity (ranging from walking to rigorous
exercise) and be cognizant of what one eats, many such ailments will be reduced over time.
§ Mental suffering could have direct causes in greed, hate, and ignorance. While some are due to
past kamma, most can be avoided or reduced by being mindful of what one thinks, speaks, and
does. Any thought, speech, or bodily action arising from a greedy, hateful, or ignorant view is
going to cause mental anguish sooner or later.
§ The easiest way to determine whether any action is inappropriate is to contemplate on the
consequences. An action rooted in greed, hate, or ignorance can harm oneself or another being.
Buddhist meditation Is The Noble Eightfold Path
7. Thus Buddhist meditation is basically to cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ By preventing from killing, stealing, verbal abuse, etc, what we are effectively doing is to “put
out existing fires” in our minds and also prevent such “future fires” from starting. This is
“niveema” or “cooling down” or Nibbāna.
§ We should also do things that are conducive to a calm mindset — associating with like-minded
people, actively engaging in moral behavior that makes the heart joyful, etc.
§ The most important thing is to learn Dhamma so that one can “see” how all this will liberate
one’s mind permanently. Then the change will become “permanent”.
When perfected, one will be doing meditation all day long while doing daily chores. That is what is
stated as “āsevitāya, bhāvithāya, bahuleekathāya.” That means, “associate and use what is good, and
do that as much as possible.”
[See, AN 8.1 Mettāsutta āsevitāya bhāvitāya bahulīkatāya
“Friends, the emancipation of heart's (cetovimutti) by loving-kindness (Metta) expected eight good
results: associated, developed, and practiced frequently, made a habit of, made a basis of
(practised thoroughly), has been implemented, acquainted with, and thoroughly undertaken.
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
1. Those who are doing breath meditation or “watching the stomach rise and fall” know that it is
relatively easy for some to calm the mind compared to others. Some cannot even keep a calm mind
for more than a few minutes; distractions start “popping up.”
§ This “popping up” is due to the five hindrances (panca nivarana) that I have described in a
post. These are the “residues” or “gunk” that we have deep inside our minds that start bubbling
up to the surface when we sit down to meditate.
§ that I have described in a post; see “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“. These
are the basic “residues” or “gunk” that we have deep inside our minds that start bubbling up to
the surface when we sit down to meditate.
2. Let us take the simile of water well contaminated with all the rotten stuff fallen into it over many
years; our minds have accumulated gunk over repeated births, not just in this life. When we are
engaged in stressful day-to-day activities, those activities stir up the “gunk,” and the mind gets
clouded; it is like taking a long pole and stirring the well water; the “gunk” at the bottom comes up.
§ The two primary “rotten things” we have are the first two on the list of the five hindrances:
kāmmaccandha (excessive greed) and vyāpāda (deep hate).
§ Vicikicchā is a set of person “likings,” and these can be likings for material things OR things
that one likes to “hate”; one does these because of the ignorance of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
Vicikicchā is sort of like a “favorite list” from the main ingredients of excessive greed and deep
hate, the first two hindrances. Kanka vicikicchā is a worse form of vicikicchā that arises due
to the wanton disregard of correct views.
§ The other two are more like “stirrers,” that stir up these bad habits and bring them up on their
own: thina middha (“trapped” or “frozen” mind), uddhacca-kukkucca (a restless mind).
§ Thina middha or inability to concentrate on dhamma concepts usually happens when tired or
after a meal. But it can be a personal characteristic or a habit; we will call this the “lazy mind.”
An “unsettled” or “excited” mind (uddhacca-kukkucca) is also personal, and arises when one
feels “superior” or “inferior” compared to others.
§ The five hindrances discussed at, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
3. When we are engaged in day-to-day activities, we see, hear, smell, taste, touch, and also think
about all sorts of things; all these are “external stirrers” that make our minds look like whirlpools. All
these gang up to get the mind to stress out and “heat up.” That is the tension that we feel in a busy
day. We need to “cool down”; we need “niveema.”
§ One way to “cool down” is to turn off those external stirrers temporarily. That is what some
people do in a breath meditation session: one goes to a quiet place and closes eyes; this will
turn off mainly the five physical senses (i.e., we do not see, hear, smell, taste, touch). That
helps to calm the mind for some people, especially if they have practiced a lot.
§ But it is not possible to turn off the sixth one, the mind itself. That is why it is instructed to try
to fix the mind on one object, say the breath or the rising of the stomach.
§ Some people try to “turn off the mind” or try to stop thoughts from arising. That is
DANGEROUS. We need to PURIFY the mind, not to turn it off. The Buddha had a perfectly
pure but very active mind. When one follows the Path, one’s mind will become sharper, not
inactive.
4. However, if we have too much gunk (defilement), then our minds can be contaminated even
without the aid of “a stirrer.” It is like an abandoned old well. It has dirty water, and one needs to
REMOVE the existing dirty water first.
§ Similarly, if one is engaged in immoral behavior (the BIG EIGHT: killing, stealing, sexual
misconduct, lying, gossiping, slandering, harsh speech, and getting “drunk” with not only drugs
or alcohol, but also with wealth, fame, power, etc), then the mind is like a well that has dirty
water to begin with. Even if it stays undisturbed, the water cannot get any cleaner by sitting in a
quiet place and turning off the physical senses.
5. Thus it would be hard to achieve calmness even with breath meditation if one is actively
engaged in the BIG EIGHT (unless one has had a lot of practice.
no point in getting discouraged if it takes time to stop bad habits; the key is to make progress, and
not to go backward.
§ Sometimes when one starts on the Ariya Bhāvanā, things may look worse before getting better.
It is like trying to cool a hot iron by sprinkling water on it when all that smoke comes out and
may appear to be getting worse. But one needs to be persistent. One needs to keep in mind that
uncountable beings have attained “cooling down” by having faith in the Buddha.
Next, “3. The Second Level – Key to Purify the Mind“, ………..
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
1. Let us go back to the example of the abandoned well. Now we have done a decent job of cleaning
the dirty water that had been there for a long time, i.e., we have reduced at least some of the main
immoral acts, the BIG EIGHT.
§ Now we need to make sure that things do not fall into the well while we try to make the water
even more cleaner; if there is no barrier around it, when it rains mud water can fall into the
well. As with the well, we need to make sure that we keep those BIG EIGHT out of our minds
as much as possible. This is ‘sīla” (pronounced “seela”) or moral living.
2. In order to make sure that we will not drift back to the old ways, we need to cultivate moral
mindfulness (“sati“): we need to be on the “lookout” for any temptations to break the BIG EIGHT.
But there is a catch that most people do not comprehend: bad habits and cravings or “gathi/āsavas”
that we have are not only from this life, but possibly from previous lives as well.
3. Again, we can use the old water well as an example: When we drained the water out of the well,
the well starts filling up with water from underground fresh water oozing through cracks (from
underground aquifers) which is pure.
§ However, if we have lot of rotten stuff at the bottom of the well that had been there for a long
time, then that pure water gets contaminated. Our bad habits (gathi/āsavas) are like the dirt at
the bottom of the well. They give rise to the five hindrances, that we mentioned in the above
section.
4. The water in the above well will now look relatively more clear if it is undisturbed, i.e, when we
let the water to settle down. This is effectively what we do in breath meditation or any such
samatha meditation. When someone is abstaining from the BIG EIGHT, it is relatively easy to calm
the mind by going to a quiet place, closing the eyes, and then focusing on one object, say the breath.
§ Such meditations are anariya meditations; they provide only temporary relief. One could also
get into anariya jhānas this way, with lots of practice, especially if one could live a secluded
life. Ancient yogis who lived moral lives and stayed away from other humans in forests could
attain higher jhānas.
§ What happens here is that the five hindrances are kept SUPPRESSED. It is like the rotten stuff
kept undisturbed at the bottom of the well.
§ If one takes a long pole and stir the well, those contaminants start coming up.
5. In the same way, when someone comes out of the quiet place, one gets “disturbed” with external
sense stimuli (i.e., when a particularly strong sense object is presented). For someone with a lot of
lust, it could be a picture of an attractive person. If someone has a lot of hate towards another, then
hateful thoughts can come to the surface just by someone mentioning that person’s name.
§ This “bubbling up of bad stuff to the surface” is called “anusaya“. To stop such anusaya, those
gathi/āsava need to be removed (gradually).
§ These terms are explained in, “Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava“.
§ This is why people who have a very calm and peaceful experience at a meditation resort come
back to regular hectic life and see that experience fade away gradually. That is because it WAS
a temporary solution. What we have in mind here is a more permanent solution. But this
approach takes a bit more time.
6. So, how do we really clean the well? It is not enough to let the gunk to sink back to the bottom; we
need to remove the gunk that has accumulated at the bottom of the well. There could even be toxic
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1009
things down there. Thus it takes an effort to remove all those. Once those are removed, there is
nothing down there that can contaminate the fresh water coming out. When the well fills up we only
need to make sure that things do not fall back in to contaminate the well.
§ Similarly, what we need to do with our minds is to remove the bad habits (gathi/āsavas) that
have been accumulated over countless past lives and reinforced in this life. If we have hate in
our minds, that hate can triggered easily. This is why some people are prone to “flare-ups” than
others. If we have extreme greed, we can be tempted easily to act immorally for sense
satisfaction through any of the six senses.
§ Even though the main ones are greed and hate, there are uncountable number of combinations
(when included with ignorance). That is why we see uncountable number of
habits/personalities/tendencies in different people. No two persons are alike, even identical
twins.
7. Looking at the five hindrances, the main culprits are of course, greed, hate, and vicikicchā (the
particular set of things one has a liking for, which can be things liked or disliked). The other two help
bring out these: the “lazy mind” will not take any effort to suppress bad thoughts; the “dispersed
mind” is too dispersed to be focused, to think clearly. All these are intimately connected to the habits
(gathi/āsavas).
§ By the way, if one can remove all the gathi/āsavas, that is when one attains Nibbāna. The
Buddha realized the “āsavakkhaya nana” just before attaining the Buddhahood. Āsavakkhaya is
“āsava“+”khaya” or removing the temptations; “khaya” is the getting rid of “san“; see, “What
is “San”? – Meaning of Saṃsāra (or Samsāra)“.
§ Here we are trying to remove some easily removable less potent habits, and at least try to
reduce the big ones. The good news is that we can EXPERIENCE the relief or “cooling down”
or “niveema” each time we either remove a small bad habit or lessen the severity of bigger
ones. We don’t have to remove ALL bad habits/cravings in order to experience the “cooling
down”.
8. After making a commitment to abstain from the BIG EIGHT as much as possible, we need to sort
out our bad habits.
§ Make a list with little things on the top and more serious things towards the bottom. We all
have greed and hate; those are the “big ones”; what we need to do here is try to remove easily
identifiable smaller bad habits; for example, explosive temper, stinginess, seeking too much
sense pleasures (i.e., being addicted to alcohol, drugs, even excess eating).
§ It is important to get rid of the ones at the top (the easy ones), and that will provide incentive to
continue. If one tries to tackle the big ones straight away, one might get discouraged and give
up the whole effort.
9. Of course, focusing on the BIG EIGHT is very important. If one is engaging in killing animals for
pleasure (eg., fishing), then that needs to be stopped if one is serious about meditation. If one is
making a living by stealing from others, that needs to be stopped. If one is engaged in sexual
activities with other married people, that needs to be stopped, etc.
§ Those are common sense things too. If one looks at one’s actions and see that it can cause harm
for oneself AND/OR others, then one needs to seriously start thinking ways to initially reduce
and eventually to stop such actions.
10. There are several posts on habits and gathi/āsavas; you may want to find and read them. And
contemplate on those ideas. An English discourse on this topic is given in the post, “How Are Gati
and Kilesa Incorporated into Thoughts?“.
§ As I emphasized at the beginning, one has to make an effort; even the Buddha could only show
the way. We need to examine what he suggested, think through to make sure they make sense.
Then the mind gets on-board, especially when it starts seeing the benefits, even small benefits.
§ The key is to get started; accomplishing things (no matter how small), and that provides the fuel
to go further.
11. One could and should use the “four bases of mental power (satara iddhipada)” in accomplishing
these goals. Tackle one goal at a time. As you accomplish more and more goals, the iddhipada
(chanda, citta, viriya, vimansa) will grow as well. These are the critical factors that the yogis used to
cultivate mundane (anariya) jhānas and gain extraordinary mental powers too.
§ Chanda is the desire to achieve the goal. Citta is the determination one makes and the viriya is
the effort that one puts in to get it done. Vimansa is careful examination of the benefits of
breaking the habit and the possible repercussions of keeping the habit. As the four iddhipada
grow (with accomplishment of more and more goals), the vimansa faculty grows in particular;
this is a facet of wisdom (paññā).
12. In trying to remove any bad habit, it is essential to look at the negative repercussions or bad
consequences (called ādeenava) from that activity. Let us take the bad habit of getting into a rage as
an example:
§ Think about the unpleasant feeling of getting “heated up” in a moment of rage. Of course, at the
moment of rage one may actually enjoy it: In extreme cases, this is why there are people dead
with 30-40 stab wounds, when all it takes to kill a person a couple of stabs; such is the danger
of getting into a rage. One feels bad about it only later, and then it is too late.
§ Even worse are the sansāric consequences: If rage becomes a dominant characteristic of one’s
personality, it is possible that this is what will be grasped at the moment of death and a birth of
a “similar kind” could result, i.e., birth in a burning hell (this is the principle of paṭicca
samuppāda: “pati+ichcha” leading to “sama+uppada”).
13. Let us take a few examples to see how some bad habits can be tackled:
§ Many people have bad temper (which could develop into hate) which is a result of vyāpāda.
Yes. This is a sansāric habit, and unlike many other habits, this one is hard to control when
triggered. This is one that needs to be dealt with when the anger is absent. The best is do the
metta bhāvanā. We will use the Ariya metta bhāvanā later. For now, one could close the eyes at
a quite time, and sincerely say, “May all beings be free of suffering, free of ailments, free of
anger, and be happy”. If you have a particular person that you are not in good terms, repeat
with his/her name. We cannot remove the anger in the mind of that person. We can only
remove the anger within ourselves. Do this a couple of times a day and if you do it sincerely it
will give results (for YOU to have a peace of mind).
§ If you are a person with cravings for sense pleasures (I do not mean necessities), your mind is
likely to be frequently seeking such things. Try to cut down on such activities, and also try to
do more giving. Donate to charities, give a few dollars to a homeless person. All these will
make you feel better; this is called pīti (“preethi” in Sinhala or joy).
§ Also, when you simplify your life, the burden on your mind will be less, and you will get a
different kind of joy than that from sense pleasures; this is “niveema” or “cool down”, or
nirāmisa sukha; see, “Nirāmisa Sukha”.
§ Alcohol or cigarette addiction is another example. Instead of trying to stop such a habit “cold
turkey”, it is better to cut down gradually. But one MUST have the discipline (the importance
of cultivating the iddhipada comes here) to stick to the plan, and not go back. It also helps to
find a replacement activity at that time (taking a less potent drink or chewing a gum, etc). One
of the four iddhipada that is essential here is citta or determination.
14. Now we are at a point where I can introduce the real ānāpānasati bhāvanā that was described by
the Buddha.
Next, “4. What do all these Different Meditation Techniques Mean?“, …….
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
1. Buddha Dhamma is focused on purifying the mind of greed, hatred, and ignorance. A pure mind
does not attach to even a trace of material form and has attained Nibbāna. As the mind is purified, it
gains nirāmisa sukha which can be experienced at various levels from the beginning. If one can
“stick to” this program for a couple of months, and then one can look back and see the change in
oneself; one should have a more peaceful, quiet mind that has “cooled down”.
§ A mind is impure because it attaches to “things in this world” with the misconception that
things in this world (31 realms) can be maintained to one’s satisfaction, i.e., with the perception
of nicca. Thus the prevailing mindset is that happiness (sukha) should be attained by
employing any means. And once attained it can be maintained and thus one is in total control of
one’s affairs (atta).
§ These three misconceptions of nicca, sukha, atta are the three culprits that keep us bound to
“this world” of 31 realms, i.e., bound to the endless rebirth process in saṃsāra. What the
Buddha showed was that the actual reality of “this world” is described by the three
characteristics of anicca, dukkha, anatta: No matter how hard we try, we cannot maintain
things to our satisfaction in the long term (anicca), thus we get distraught (dukkha), and thus we
are not in control (anatta).
2. I am NOT saying that one should not work hard to get educated and get a good job. That MUST be
done; one cannot have a peace of mind if one is hungry and homeless. But we also need to be aware
of the FACT that all mundane achievements are temporary; even if we get a live this life without a
major catastrophe, we have to leave all behind when we die.
§ One acts with greed, hate, and ignorance and makes the mind impure because of the wrong
perceptions of nicca, sukha, atta. One is willing to do immoral acts to get some temporary
satisfaction, because one does not see the bad consequences of such actions. However, when
one truly understands the reality, i.e., anicca, dukkha, anatta, one is automatically prevented
from doing such immoral acts even compulsively.
§ For that stage to be reached, one has to train one’s mind to “take in the good” and “reject the
bad”; one needs to change one’s habits and this is done basically with the ānāpānasati
meditation.
The following is a logical sequence for meditation:
3. First one needs to sort out what is good and what is bad, and the consequences of good and bad
actions. This is why the vision, sammā diṭṭhi, comes first in the Noble Eightfold Path, and this is done
by “sorting out the good from the bad”.
§ Vipassana (vi+passa means sort and discard, where “vi” is to sort out and “passa” is to discard)
and vidassana (vi+dassana means sort out by clear vision, where “dassana” means the vision)
mean the same thing: understand Buddha Dhamma and acquire the vision needed to be able to
sort out the “good” from the “bad”.
§ I cannot emphasize enough the importance of vipassana (vidassana) or insight meditation.
Without the “correct” vision, one could strive for the whole lifetime and not get anywhere: one
has to understand the true nature of this world (anicca, dukkha, anatta), the Four Noble Truths,
and the Noble Eightfold Path. It is not memorization, but understanding that counts.
4. A huge amount of defilements are removed from one’s mind with this insight meditation: to
understand the “anicca nature of this world”. It is the first type of meditation that is needed.
One can attain the Sotāpanna stage without doing any other types of meditation discussed below. The
Buddha once took a bit of soil to a fingertip and told the bhikkhus that, “if the amount of defilements
a Sotāpanna needs to get rid of is comparable to this amount of soil, then a normal human being has
to get rid of an equivalent to the soil in the whole Earth”.
§ That is not a misprint or an exaggeration. A Sotāpanna is bound to attain Nibbāna within a
maximum of seven “bhava”, whereas a normal human being could be trapped in the rebirth
process for trillions of years to come. We all have been through the rebirth process for
uncountable trillions of years; see, “Infinity -How Big is It?”.
§ Many people say, “I do like my life. Why would I not want to be reborn?”. The problem is
that future rebirths may not be in the human realm. We have no idea what we have done in
past lives. Thus even if we live a perfectly moral life, there are no guarantees that we will get a
good rebirth. This is why understanding kamma, rebirth, etc via insight meditation is important.
5. How does one do the insight meditation? Listening to discourses and reading Dhamma concepts
are the two main forms of getting the correct information. Then one could contemplate on those
concepts in a sitting meditation. But reading up on Dhamma concepts during a quiet time itself is
meditation; also see, “How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā” and the follow-up post.
§ Once some understanding is reached via vipassana (vidassana) bhāvanā or insight meditation,
one can start the next two key steps: metta bhāvanā and various forms of anupassana bhāvanā.
§ Once one understands the true status of affairs in the wider world of 31 realms, one can really
comprehend the amount of suffering that has been hidden from us. With that understanding one
can engage in the Ariya metta bhāvanā, which is an excellent way to pay back our old debts to
other beings. This is the second way to purify our minds too.
§ But I hope I have been able to convey the idea that the bulk of work can be done with just
insight meditation, contemplating “anicca, dukkha, anatta“. However, doing the other two
types of bhāvanā, i.e., metta bhāvanā and ānāpānasati, can be helpful for the insight meditation
too.
6. The last and third way to purify the mind is via anupassana. Anupassana means “discard
according to the principles learned” (“anu” means according to and “passana” means to get rid of;
another meaning of “anu” is defilements, which is applicable too). Anupassana can take various
forms: Ānāpānasati bhāvanā is the foundation. Once “ana” and “pana” are sorted out by vipassana
(vidassana), one needs to engage in ānāpānasati all the time. This means one needs to be mindful of
what one is about to do, and make sure it is a “right thing to do”.
§ When one starts understanding anicca, dukkha, anatta, one can start doing the
aniccanupassana, dukkhanupassana, and anattanupassana, and four more related
“anupassana”. I will elaborate on this later.
§ Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā (with kayanupassana, vedananupassana, cittanupassana, and
dhammanupassana) includes all the bhāvanā techniques that we have discussed so far. It is
THE ultimate which encompasses everything that is needed to attain some stress relief all the
way to attain the Arahanthood. Ānāpānasati is a big part of the satipaṭṭhāna, and that is all we
need to attain the Sotāpanna stage.
7. Thus one could make things simpler by just doing insight meditation, ānāpānasati, and the metta
bhāvanā. That is all one needs to do to have a “better state of mind” or even to become a Sotāpanna.
8. The problem with meditation techniques taught even in Theravāda schools these days is that they
are either breath meditation or chantings. How can one remove defilements by watching the breath?
Even though it can calm the mind, there are no long-term benefits, because watching the breath
CANNOT reduce defilements from the mind.
§ Another popular technique is to just contemplate on the impermanence, a popular form of
which is to keep repeating something like, “my body is impermanent, it is subjected to decay
and death”. Has anyone achieved any progress doing that for even twenty, thirty years? A
Buddha does not need to tell us that. All people, belonging to any religion, know those are facts
of life.
§ Yet another popular “chanting” is to contemplate the “foulness of the body”. That is not what
the Buddha meant by the “patikula manasikara bhāvanā“. Again, everyone knows that our
bodies are subject to decay and death; see, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
Next, “5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness Meditation)“, ………….
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
1. We all have acquired innumerable “bad kamma vipāka” in this cycle of rebirths (saṃsāra) that has
no beginning. There is a very simple recipe for stopping many of such “bad kamma vipāka” from
coming to fruition by “wearing out” and ultimately removing the “kamma seeds” associated with
them.
§ We acquire a bad “kamma seed” when we do something wrong to a living being, and we
become indebted to that being. Just like we can become “debt-free” by paying off debts, we can
pay off that debt. The problem is that we have become indebted to innumerable beings in
previous rebirths. In the “Metta Sutta” (haliddavasana sutta) and other suttas, the Buddha has
explained how much of this debt can be paid off by doing the Ariya metta bhāvanā and also by
transferring merits to “all beings” when we do a good deed; see, “Transfer of Merits (Pattidana)
– How Does it Happen?“.
§ Here we focus on the Ariya metta bhāvanā. First some background material to clarify what this
means.
2. The standard metta bhāvanā (loving kindness meditation) goes something like, “May myself and
all beings be free of suffering, healthy, happy, and be free of all suffering”, or some similar (longer)
passages.
§ Any type of such meditation is of course good. It makes your own mind calm down, and makes
you think about the (mundane) welfare of the other beings.
3. However, the Ariya metta bhāvanā has a much more deeper meaning. It is done with at least some
idea of the complexity of “this world” with 31 realms and the status of the beings in those realms. In
order to cultivate true compassion and loving kindness one NEEDS TO FEEL the possible suffering
in all those realms; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“:
§ The beings in the lowest four realms (apāyas) undergo unimaginable suffering, both physical
and mental.
§ In the lowest five realms (the apāyas and the human realm), beings have physical bodies that
are subject to sicknesses, body aches, and getting old before dying.
§ The sixth through eleventh realms are that of the devas. They have spontaneous births with
fully formed (but less dense) bodies that are not subjected to sickness, aches and pains, and
visible signs of old age until close to death. But they also have all five physical senses just like
the lower five realms, and could be subjected to repulsive touch, distasteful/unpleasant tastes,
smells, and sounds, and visuals.
§ The higher 20 realms that include rūpa loka and arūpa loka have even less dense bodies than
the devas, and do not have the physical sense faculties for taste, smell, and body touch. Thus
any suffering they have is all mental, and not as intense as in the lower realms.
4. However, no living being is free of FUTURE suffering in any of the 31 realms, because unless the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna has been attained, even the beings in the highest realm can end up even
in the apāyas (lowest four realms) in future rebirths.
§ And the only way to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna is by comprehending the Three
Characteristics of this world of 31 realms: anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ The first level of understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta leads to the Sotāpanna stage; when
one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one becomes free from the apāyas FOREVER. This happens
via the inability of the mind of a Sotāpanna to generate certain cittas with “apayagami”
kammic power; see, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna avoids Apayagami Citta” and
“Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna”.
§ When the next stage of Nibbāna (Sakadāgāmī stage) is attained, one becomes free of births in
the lower five realms where suffering due to physical ailments and diseases are possible. Thus
one PERMANENTLY becomes “healthy” by attaining the Sakadāgāmī stage.
§ At the Anāgāmī stage, one removes more akusala citta (and other fulfil other conditions; see,
“Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna”), and will never be born again in kāma loka
including the deva realm. Thus one becomes PERMANENTLY free of any physical suffering.
§ Then at the Arahant stage, all defilements are removed from the mind and one will never be
reborn in any of the 31 realms. The mind truly becomes free and one attains permanent
nirāmisa sukha; see, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is nirāmisa sukha?” and other posts on
nirāmisa sukha.
§ As you can see, the Ariya metta bhāvanā is similar in structure to the conventional one, but the
words have deeper meanings. For example, by saying “be healthy” now it is meant to be
healthy forever, i.e., not to be born ever with a body that is subject to diseases and old age.
5. Now we can see how the Ariya metta bhāvanā is formulated:
§ “May myself and all living beings attain the Sotāpanna stage and be free from suffering in the
apāyas forever”
“May myself and all living beings attain the Sakadāgāmī stage and be healthy forever”.
“May myself and all living beings attain the Anāgāmī stage and be content (attain peaceful
happiness) forever”.
“May myself and all living beings attain the Arahant stage and be free from all suffering and
attain the full Nibbānic bliss”.
§ All four Brahma vihara (metta, karuna, mudita, upekkha) are cultivated with this bhāvanā.
6. What matters is not the particular set of word used, but what is felt in one’s heart. In order to do
that one needs to truly comprehend that there is REAL SUFFERING in this world, not only at the
human or animal realms, but in many other realms.
§ The impact of the metta bhāvanā increases gradually with increased understanding of anicca,
dukkha, anatta, because then one realizes the dangers and suffering that all living beings face in
future lives.
§ The potential of the metta bhāvanā is enormous. The Buddha said one could attain the Anāgāmī
stage by correctly doing the metta bhāvanā. But that entails understanding anicca, dukkha,
anatta, i.e., attaining the Sotāpanna stage or at least embark on the path to Sotāpanna stage.
§ However, even before attaining the Sotāpanna stage, one could reap many benefits by doing
this correct Ariya metta bhāvanā; see, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
§ It is best to do Ariya metta bhāvanā and vipassana bhāvanā (meditation on anicca, dukkha,
anatta and other dhamma concepts) in a sitting meditation session every day; see, “4. What do
all these Different Meditation Techniques Mean?“.
§ Initially 10-15 minutes would be good for formal meditation, and can be increased as the
nirāmisa sukha sets in one starts seeing the benefits; one could stay in mediation for hours. Of
course ānāpānasati needs to be practiced the whole day, which means being aware of what is
“taken in” (ana) and what is “discarded” (pana); see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?” and other related
posts in the meditation section.
§ Listening to discourses and reading about Dhamma are also forms of meditation, and should be
done during quite times so the key concepts can be absorbed.
7. The Ariya metta bhāvanā is one of the most POTENT tools that we have. It is simple concept, but
the main difficulty is with the “Ariya” part; one needs to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta for the
bhāvanā to be fully effective.
§ Still even the mundane version stated in #2 above is good start. As one follows the Path and
understands the concepts better (not the book knowledge), the javana power in one’s thoughts
become strong, and the bhāvanā becomes stronger and more effective.
§ In the Abhidhamma language, the most potent kusala citta is the “somanassa sahagata ñāṇa
sampayutta asankharika citta“, i.e., the “thought that arises with joy and wisdom
automatically”. This thought also gets stronger with increasing wisdom, and gets stronger as
one gets to Sotāpanna magga, Sotāpanna phala, etc and optimum only at the Arahant stage.
§ Yet even when one is following the mundane eightfold path, this citta is there, at a lower
strength. It needs to be cultivated; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“, and “What is Unique in
Buddha Dhamma“.
Next, “6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)“, ……..
1. I hope that several key points are clear from the discussion in the post, “3. The Second Level – Key
to Purify the Mind“:
§ Bad habits (gathi/āsava) are associated with one more of immoral or unworthy acts, speech, or
thoughts. We need to discard those.
§ To counter the bad habits one needs to cultivate good habits. For this we need to cultivate moral
behavior by engaging in moral activities that bring joy to the heart.
§ AND we need to do this all the time; we cannot let bad habits come back, which means we
need to be on the lookout for any lapses in our practice. And we need to be on the lookout for
opportunities to do moral acts that are beneficial for oneself and others.
2. The Buddha described bhāvanā as follows: “āsevitāya, bhāvitāya, bahuleekathāya,…” or “keep
close association, use often, and use all the time (what is good)……”. When one is making effort to
form a new habit, one should be thinking about it and doing things to support that whenever possible.
Trying to do it in a formal meditation session will not be enough.
§ We discussed the current scientific explanation of how repeated acts help form habits by
strengthening a set of neural connections in the brain in an earlier post in this series. Same thing
works to break bad habits by NOT doing it whenever that comes to the mind; existing neural
connections will get weaker.
§ What is to contemplate: To be mindful to “take in good things (kusala or moral things), and to
“discard bad things (akusala or immoral things)”. This is the real meaning of ānāpānasati
bhāvanā.
§ In the wider sense, “āna” includes anything that needs to “taken in” for the betterment of life,
and “pāna” the opposite. For example, we should eat only foods that are good for the body, and
stay away from or discard foods that are bad.
§ Nowadays, “āna” is taken to be “breath in” and “āpāna” is taken to be “breath out”; “sati”
means mindfulness so, the word “ānāpānasati” is interpreted as “mindfully breathing in and
mindfully breathing out”. This is the conventional (or “padaparama”) interpretation of
“ānāpāna”, and that is only a very narrow use; see the post below that explains these terms.
3. These aspects are discussed in many suttas. I have a couple of posts that discuss the Sabbāsava
sutta (sabba+āsava is all āsavas), which point out seven specific steps that will help remove bad
habits and develop good habits (gathi/āsavas).
§ Looking at the same goal from a slightly different viewpoint, five such steps are given in the
Vitakkasanthāna (vitakka+san+thāna = removing defiled thoughts) sutta; I hope to write a post
on this later.
4. Now, with all the discussion we have had up to this point, how can just a process of “breathing in”
and “breathing out” mindfully GET RID OF either the bad habits (gathi/āsāvas) or the five
hindrances?
§ Of course that is not possible.
§ But it CAN do one thing, as we mentioned before. If we sit in a quiet place with the eyes closed
(i.e., turn off the five physical senses in effect), AND fix the mind on the breath, we can get the
five hindrances to settle down and not come up (assuming that we are staying away from
committing the BIG EIGHT immoral acts).
§ However, this calming down or getting to samatha is a TEMPORARY solution. The moment
we come back to the real world with all its distractions and temptations, those habits take over.
5. The breath meditation needs to be used appropriately, with the understanding that it can provide
only temporary relief. This breath meditation is the same meditation that was used by the Hindu yogis
to attain mundane (Anāriya) jhānas even before the Buddha.
§ Since the time Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga was accepted as the basis of Theravāda
Dhamma (in the fifth century CE), this “literal interpretation” of the ānāpānasati has been used.
§ The real ānāpānasati bhāvanā is not described in the Visuddhimagga, and is not described in
any Mahayana or even Theravāda texts today. One needs to go directly to the Tipiṭaka to find
it; it is described in many suttas, for example the Assāsa sutta. I could not find an English
translation of this sutta. Another one Arittha Sutta, and the translation published at the
Accesstoinsight site is not complete, even though it does contain Buddha’s admonition to Ven.
Arittha that in and out breathing is only one version of ānāpānasati (in the sutta it says it is
NOT the Ariya or Noble version) : WebLink: ACCESSTOINSIGHT: Arittha Sutta: To Arittha
§ Arittha Sutta: To Arittha (On Mindfulness of Breathing)
6. Thus there are two interpretations of the ānāpānasati bhāvanā: one is the conventional “breathing”
version and the other is the real version recommended by the Buddha, which has a wider
interpretation, including breathing to a minor extent.
§ The Ānāpānasati sutta is the condensed version of the Buddha’s desanā on ānāpānasati
bhāvanā. As with most main suttas, the discourse was condensed in to the form for easy
transmission. Other suttas, mostly by Ven. Sariputta, have explained the terms like “āna” and
“āpana” in detail (like the Assāsa Sutta).
§ See, “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“, where I provide a detailed discussion based on the
Tipiṭaka.
§ Furthermore, Sinhala commentaries (atthakatha) were also written to explain the main suttas.
Unfortunately, these atthakathas were burned down shortly after Buddhaghosa wrote his
Visuddhimagga and other books. However, three important ones (Patisambhida Magga
Pakarana, Pitakopadesa, and Netthipakarana) have survived because they had been included
in the Tipiṭaka. What I describe here is from those books in the Tipiṭaka.
§ Buddhaghosa was a Hindu before converting to be a Buddhist later on; see, “The Life and
Work of Buddhaghosa” by B. C. Law (1927). Some say he became a Buddhist in order to
introduce Hindu concepts to Buddha Dhamma. Either that or he just used whatever he
understood to be the ānāpānasati without any malicious intentions. Either way, the correct
interpretation had been hidden for all these years; see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A
Focused Analysis“.
7. The key message of the Buddha was that we need to remove the greed, hate, and ignorance that we
all have in our minds, and by doing that we can experience the nirāmisa sukha that is of better quality
and of permanent nature. Let us now discuss the basic meditation technique that will start us on the
correct path to achieve lasting happiness.
§ More evidence from the Tipiṭaka: “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“.
Thanissaro Bhikkhu
© 2006
At Savatthi. There the Blessed One said, "Monks, do you develop mindfulness of in-&-out
breathing?"
When this was said, Ven. Arittha replied to the Blessed One, "I develop mindfulness of in-&-out
breathing, lord."
"But how do you develop mindfulness of in-&-out breathing, Arittha?"
"Having abandoned sensual desire for past sensual pleasures, lord, having done away with sensual
desire for future sensual pleasures, and having thoroughly subdued perceptions of irritation with
regard to internal & external events, I breathe in mindfully and breathe out mindfully."[1]
"There is that mindfulness of in-&-out breathing, Arittha. I don't say that there isn't. But as to how
mindfulness of in-&-out breathing is brought in detail to its culmination, listen and pay close
attention. I will speak."
"As you say, lord," Ven. Arittha responded to the Blessed One.
The Blessed One said, "And how, Arittha, is mindfulness of in-&-out breathing brought in detail to
its culmination? There is the case where a monk, having gone to the wilderness, to the shade of a tree,
or to an empty building, sits down folding his legs crosswise, holding his body erect, and setting
mindfulness to the fore.[2] Always mindful, he breathes in; mindful he breathes out.
"[1] Breathing in long, he discerns, 'I am breathing in long'; or breathing out long, he discerns, 'I am
breathing out long.' [2] Or breathing in short, he discerns, 'I am breathing in short'; or breathing out
short, he discerns, 'I am breathing out short.' [3] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in sensitive to the
entire body.'[3] He trains himself, 'I will breathe out sensitive to the entire body.' [4] He trains
himself, 'I will breathe in calming bodily fabrication.'[4] He trains himself, 'I will breathe out calming
bodily fabrication.'
"[5] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in sensitive to rapture.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out
sensitive to rapture.' [6] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in sensitive to pleasure.' He trains himself, 'I
will breathe out sensitive to pleasure.' [7] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in sensitive to mental
fabrication.'[5] He trains himself, 'I will breathe out sensitive to mental fabrication.' [8] He trains
himself, 'I will breathe in calming mental fabrication.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out calming
mental fabrication.'
"[9] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in sensitive to the mind.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out
sensitive to the mind.' [10] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in satisfying the mind.' He trains himself,
'I will breathe out satisfying the mind.' [11] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in steadying the mind.'
He trains himself, 'I will breathe out steadying the mind.' [12] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in
releasing the mind.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out releasing the mind.'[6]
"[13] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in focusing on inconstancy.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe
out focusing on inconstancy.' [14] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in focusing on dispassion.'[7] He
trains himself, 'I will breathe out focusing on dispassion.' [15] He trains himself, 'I will breathe in
focusing on cessation.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out focusing on cessation.' [16] He trains
himself, 'I will breathe in focusing on relinquishment.' He trains himself, 'I will breathe out focusing
on relinquishment.'
"This, Arittha, is how mindfulness of in-&-out breathing is brought in detail to its culmination."
Notes
1. The Commentary reads this statement as indicating that Arittha has attained the third level of
Awakening, non-return, but it is also possible to interpret the statement on a more mundane level:
Arittha is simply practicing mindfulness in the present moment, having temporarily subdued desire
for past and future sensual pleasures, and having temporarily subdued any thought of irritation with
regard to the present.
2. To the fore (parimukham): The Abhidhamma takes an etymological approach to this term, defining
it as around (pari-) the mouth (mukham). In the Vinaya, however, it is used in a context (Cv.V.27.4)
where it undoubtedly means the front of the chest. There is also the possibility that the term could be
used idiomatically as "to the front," which is how I have translated it here.
3. The commentaries insist that "body" here means the breath, but this is unlikely in this context, for
the next step — without further explanation — refers to the breath as "bodily fabrication." If the
Buddha were using two different terms to refer to the breath in such close proximity, he would have
been careful to signal that he was redefining his terms (as he does below, when explaining that the
first four steps in breath meditation correspond to the practice of focusing on the body in and of itself
as a frame of reference). The step of breathing in and out sensitive to the entire body relates to the
many similes in the suttas depicting jhāna as a state of whole-body awareness (see MN 119).
4. "In-&-out breaths are bodily; these are things tied up with the body. That's why in-&-out breaths
are bodily fabrications." — MN 44.
5. "Perceptions & feelings are mental; these are things tied up with the mind. That's why perceptions
& feelings are mental fabrications." — MN 44.
6. AN 9.34 shows how the mind, step by step, is temporarily released from burdensome mental states
of greater and greater refinement as it advances through the stages of jhāna.
7. Lit., "fading."
See also: MN 118; SN 54.8.
1. The Ānāpānasati Sutta in the Majjhima Nikāya (WebLink: suttacentral: Ānāpānasati Sutta, MN
118) starts off with the following, just after the very first verse:
Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvithā bahulīkathā mahapphalā hoti mahānisansā. Ānāpānassati,
bhikkhave, bhāvithā bahulīkathā chattāro satipaṭṭhāna paripūreti. Chattāro satipaṭṭhānā bhāvithā
bahulīkathā saptha bojjhaṅga paripūrenti. Saptha bojjhaṅgā bhāvithā bahulīkathā vijjā vimuttin
paripūrenti……
That means: “Ānāpānasati, Bhikkhus, when practiced frequently bears much fruits and leads to
much benefits. Ānāpānasati, Bhikkhus, when cultivated and pursued, brings the four satipattānas to
their completion. The four satipattānas, when cultivated and pursued, bring the seven bojjangas to
their completion. The seven bojjangas, when cultivated and pursued, bring vijjā (opposite of avijjā)
and vimutti (or Nibbāna) to their completion….”
§ Now, if ānāpāna means “breathing in and breathing out”, how can that lead to the completion
of the four satipattānas, the seven bojjangas, removal of avijjā, and the attainment of Nibbāna?
Can anyone seriously think that is possible?
§ Instead, ānāpāna MEANS cultivating satipattāna, saptha bojjanga, etc., by “taking in morals”
and “expelling immorals” as we discuss below.
2. Satipattāna bhāvanā is a more detailed version of the Ānāpānasati bhāvanā. Thus it is important to
learn the correct version of the Ānāpānasati. If one does Ānāpānasati correctly, it can be easily
turned to Satipattāna bhāvanā.
3. First let us figure out exactly what the Buddha meant by “āna” and “āpāna” in “āna+āpāna+sati”
which rhymes as ānāpānasati; of course “sati” is mindfulness.
§ “Āna” is taking in; In Sinhala, “ānayanaya” is “import”. “āpāna” is discarding; In Sinhala,
“apānayānaya” is “export”. Thus “āna”+”āpāna” or ānāpāna is “taking in/discarding” or
import/export.
§ “Assa” is same as “āna”, and “passa” is the same as “āpāna”. In Sri Lanka, parents tell their
child to clean his/her room by saying, “kāmaraya (room) assa passa (or aspas) karaganna”.
§ When cleaning the room, the child needs to get rid of the clutter (passa), but also can take in
(assa) something like a flower vase to make the room look more pleasant, or to take in a chair
that can be useful.
4. During the time of the Buddha itself, auxiliary suttas as well as commentaries (“Atthakatha”)
were written to explain the key words/phrases in the main suttas that were abbreviated for easy
transmission; see, “Preservation of Dhamma“. There are two important suttas, Assāsa sutta and
the Parama Assāsa sutta that describe how one should “take in” kusala thoughts and “discard”
akusala thoughts; that is “āna”+”āpāna” (ānāpāna) or “assa/passa”, for cleaning up (the mind).
§ In the Mahasaccaka Sutta, “assa/passa” was also used to indicate “in and out breathing” when
the Buddha was describing to Saccaka how he engaged in the “breath meditation” per
instructions by Alara Kalama and Uddacaramaputta while he was searching for the truth as
Bodhisattva.
§ But the very next verses of that sutta describes how he gave up on that technique and moved
onto the correct path.
§ So, we need to be careful about making sure a given phrase is used in the right context,
depending on the situation.
§ For example, there are several conventional and deeper meanings to the key words “atta” and
“anatta“, and one needs to be able figure out which meaning to use for a given case; see, “Attā
Hi Attano Nātho“, “Anatta – the Opposite of Which Atta?“, and links in those posts.
5. When one knows what kusala/akusala kamma are, the first thing to do is to prevent from doing
akusala kamma and to make an effort to do kusala kamma by engaging in meritorious actions (puñña
kriya); see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)”, and “Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā”.
§ Thus when one leads a moral life, one is automatically engaging in the basic form of
Ānāpānasati.
§ AND one cannot do a proper formal Ānāpānasati meditation and get to even samādhi, let alone
a jhāna, unless one leads a moral life. The five hindrances are too strong to be suppressed; see,
“Key to Calming the Mind – Five Hindrances”.
6. Formal Ānāpānasati bhāvanā can be done in a formal sitting or walking meditation session, while
engaging in the basic version (taking in what is good/discarding what is bad) all the time.
§ There is no need to do samatha bhāvanā separately. If one does a formal Ānāpānasati session
with the eyes closed in a quiet place, one will automatically get into samādhi. Let good
thoughts grow, and discard bad thoughts. Very simple.
§ There is no way that one can purify one’s mind by breathing in/out, even though it can get
one’s mind to calm down (samatha). The correct way of doing it does both samatha and
vipassāna together.
10. When we think a bit more about this, we realize that what needs to be discarded are micchā diṭṭhi
(wrong views), micchā sankappa (wrong thoughts or ideas), micchā vaca (incorrect, harmful speech),
micchā kammanta (incorrect/harmful actions), micchā ajiva (incorrect/harmful way of living), micchā
vayama (tendency to strive on immoral activities), micchā sati (tendency to focus on immoral
activities); when one does all that micchā samādhi (tendency to get absorbed in immoral
ideas/actions) is the result.
§ In the same way, what we need to “take in” are sammā diṭṭhi, sammā sankappa, sammā vaca ,
sammā kammanta, sammā ajiva, sammā vayama, sammā sati, and when one keeps doing that
one automatically gets to sammā samādhi.
§ Put it in another way, Ānāpānasati is nothing but “taking in” the Noble Eightfold Path and
“”discarding” the opposite.
11. The longer one “takes in” or “lives” the Noble Eightfold Path and “rejects” the opposite, easier it
becomes to get to samādhi in a formal meditation session. When samādhi grows little by little, one
day one will automatically get into the first Ariya jhāna. However, there is one more thing that is
needed before getting to the Ariya jhānas: an understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta. We will
discuss why in a future post.
§ Keep practicing “ānāpāna” as much as possible throughout the day. With time, you will feel
the “cooling down” or ‘nivāna” or “a taste of Nibbāna“.
§ Buddha Dhamma is NOT about following rituals. It is all about cleansing one’s mind and that
takes an effort and concentration. Initially it could be hard, but as one gains samādhi bit by bit,
one gets motivated. In few months one can look back at one’s life and see that it has changed
for the better.
§ Even though one can start with discarding immoral deeds and cultivating or taking in moral,
one needs to know the real meanings of “san“, anicca and anatta in order to do the ānāpānasati
bhāvanā in a deeper sense: (i) One needs to comprehend which “san” or defilements to be
discarded; see, “San“. (ii) One needs to know the deeper meanings of Tilakkhaṇa; see, “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta“.
Next, “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“, ……..
11.7.1 Ānāpānassatisutta (Majjhima Nikāya 118)
Majjhima Nikāya 118
Ānāpānassati-sutta
Evaṃ me sutaṃ— ekaṃ samayaṃ bhagavā sāvatthiyaṃ viharati pubbārāme migāramātupāsāde
sambahulehi abhiññātehi abhiññātehi therehi sāvakehi saddhiṃ—āyasmatā ca sāriputtena āyasmatā
ca mahāmoggallānena āyasmatā ca mahākassapena āyasmatā ca mahākaccāyanena āyasmatā ca
mahākoṭṭhikena āyasmatā ca mahākappinena āyasmatā ca mahācundena āyasmatā ca anuruddhena
āyasmatā ca revatena āyasmatā ca ānandena, aññ ehi ca abhiññātehi abhiññātehi therehi sāvakehi
saddhiṃ.
Tena kho pana samayena therā bhikkhū nave bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti. Appekacce therā bhikkhū
dasapi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti, appekacce therā bhikkhū vīsampi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti,
appekacce therā bhikkhū tiṃsampi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti, appekacce therā bhikkhū
cattārīsampi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti. Te ca navā bhikkhū therehi bhikkhūhi ovadiyamānā
anusāsiyamānā uḷāraṃ pubbenāparaṃ visesaṃ jānanti.
Tena kho pana samayena bhagavā tadahuposathe pannarase pavāraṇāya puṇṇāya puṇṇamāya rattiyā -
bhikkhusaṃghaparivuto abbhokāse nisinno hoti. Atha kho bhagavā tuṇhībhūtaṃ tuṇhībhūtaṃ
bhikkhusaṃghaṃ anuviloketvā bhikkhū āmantesi: “āraddhosmi, bhikkhave, imāya paṭipadāya; ārad-
dhacittosmi, bhikkhave, imāya paṭipadāya. Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, bhiyyoso mattāya vīriyaṃ
ārabhatha appattassa pattiyā, anadhigatassa adhigamāya, asacchikatassa sacchikiriyāya. Idhevāhaṃ
sāvatthiyaṃ komudiṃ cātumāsiniṃ āgamessāmī”ti. Assosuṃ kho jānapadā bhikkhū: “bhagavā kira
tattheva sāvatthiyaṃ komudiṃ cātumāsiniṃ āgamessatī”ti. Te jānapadā bhikkhū sāvatthiṃ osaranti
bhagavantaṃ dassanāya. Te ca kho therā bhikkhū bhiyyoso mattāya nave bhikkhū ovadanti
anusāsanti. Appekacce therā bhikkhū dasapi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti, appekacce therā bhikkhū
vīsampi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti, appekacce therā bhikkhū tiṃsampi bhikkhū ovadanti
anusāsanti, appekacce therā bhikkhū cattārīsampi bhikkhū ovadanti anusāsanti. Te ca navā bhikkhū
therehi bhikkhūhi ovadiyamānā anusāsiyamānā uḷāraṃ pubbenāparaṃ visesaṃ jānanti.
Tena kho pana samayena bhagavā tadahuposathe pannarase komudiyā cātumāsiniyā puṇṇāya
puṇṇamāya rattiyā bhikkhusaṅghaparivuto abbhokāse nisinno hoti. Atha kho bhagavā tuṇhībhūtaṃ
tuṇhībhūtaṃ bhikkhusaṅghaṃ anuviloketvā bhikkhū āmantesi:
“Apalāpāyaṃ, bhikkhave, parisā; nippalāpāyaṃ, bhikkhave, parisā; suddhā sāre patiṭṭhitā. Tathārūpo
ayaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhusaṃgho; tathārūpā ayaṃ, bhikkhave, parisā yathārūpā parisā āhuneyyā
pāhuneyyā dakkhiṇeyyā añjalikaraṇīyā anuttaraṃ puññakkhettaṃ lokassa. Tathārūpo ayaṃ,
bhikkhave, bhikkhusaṃgho; tathārūpā ayaṃ, bhikkhave, parisā yathārūpāya parisāya appaṃ dinnaṃ
bahu hoti, bahu dinnaṃ bahutaraṃ. Tathārūpo ayaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhusaṃgho; tathārūpā ayaṃ,
bhikkhave, parisā yathārūpā parisā dullabhā dassanāya lokassa. Tathārūpo ayaṃ, bhikkhave,
bhikkhusaṃgho; tathārūpā ayaṃ, bhikkhave, parisā yathārūpaṃ parisaṃ alaṃ yojanagaṇanāni
dassanāya gantuṃ puṭosenāpi.
Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe arahanto khīṇāsavā vusitavanto katakaraṇīyā
ohitabhārā anuppattasadatthā parikkhīṇabhavasaṃyojanā sammadaññāvimuttā—evarūpāpi,
bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe. Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū imasmiṃ
bhikkhusaṃghe pañcannaṃ orambhāgiyānaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ parikkhayā opapātikā tattha
parinibbāyino anāvattidhammā tasmā lokā—evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ
bhikkhusaṃghe. Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe tiṇṇaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ
parikkhayā rāgadosamohānaṃ tanuttā sakadāgāmino sakideva imaṃ lokaṃ āgantvā dukkhassantaṃ
karissanti—evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe. Santi, bhikkhave,
bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe tiṇṇaṃ saṃyojanānaṃ parikkhayā sotāpannā avinipātadhammā
niyatā sambodhiparāyanā—evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṃghe.
Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe catunnaṃ satipaṭṭhānānaṃ bhāvanānuyogamanu-
yuttā viharanti—evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe. Santi, bhikkhave,
bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe catunnaṃ sammappadhānānaṃ bhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā
viharanti … pe … catunnaṃ iddhipādānaṃ … pañcannaṃ indriyānaṃ … pañcannaṃ balānaṃ …
sattannaṃ bojjhaṅgānaṃ … ariyassa aṭṭhaṅgikassa maggassa bhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā viharanti—
evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe. Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū imasmiṃ
bhikkhusaṅghe mettābhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā viharanti … karuṇābhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā
viharanti … muditābhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā viharanti … upekkhābhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā
viharanti … asubhabhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā viharanti … aniccasaññābhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā
viharanti—evarūpāpi, bhikkhave, santi bhikkhū imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe. Santi, bhikkhave, bhikkhū
imasmiṃ bhikkhusaṅghe ānāpānassatibhāvanānuyogamanuyuttā viharanti. Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave,
bhāvitā bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti mahānisaṃsā. Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā
cattāro satipaṭṭhāne paripūreti. Cattāro satipaṭṭhānā bhāvitā bahulīkatā satta bojjhaṅge paripūrenti.
Satta bojjhaṅgā bhāvitā bahulīkatā vijjāvimuttiṃ paripūrenti.
Kathaṃ bhāvitā ca, bhikkhave, ānāpānassati kathaṃ bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti mahānisaṃsā? Idha,
bhikkhave, bhikkhu araññagato vā rukkhamūlagato vā suññāgāragato vā nisīdati pallaṅkaṃ ābhujitvā
ujuṃ kāyaṃ paṇidhāya parimukhaṃ satiṃ upaṭṭhapetvā. So satova assasati satova passasati.
1. If you Google “Anapanasati”, almost all websites that come up identify it as “Buddhist breath
mediation” or “mindfulness of breathing”. But Tipiṭaka suttās clearly lead to the conclusion that
breath meditation is not Buddhist Ānāpāna bhāvanā.
§ Breath meditation was practiced by yogis even at the time of the Buddha. So, breath meditation
predates Buddha’s Ānāpāna bhāvanā. Buddha rejected it, because it does not lead to Nibbāna,
or PERMANENT relief from suffering.
§ There are many suttās in the Tipiṭaka that clearly state that when Ānāpāna is followed
correctly, that automatically fulfills Satipaṭṭhāna, Saptha Bojjanga, and all 37 Factors of
Enlightenment, and leads to Nibbāna. Therefore, Ānāpānasati is infinitely more deeper than
just focusing on one’s breath.
I will provide evidence for those two statements below. First, let us see what can be
§
accomplished with Buddhist Ānāpānasati bhāvanā.
2. According to the WebLink: suttacentral: Ānāpānassati Sutta (MN 118): “..Ānāpānassati,
bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā cattāro satipaṭṭhāne paripūreti. Cattāro satipaṭṭhānā bhāvitā
bahulīkatā satta bojjhaṅge paripūrenti. Satta bojjhaṅgā bhāvitā bahulīkatā vijjāvimuttiṃ
paripūrenti.”
§ Translated, “..Ānāpānassati, when used (bhāvitā) and used frequently (bahulīkatā), completes
(paripūreti) four types of Satipaṭṭhāna. Cattāro satipaṭṭhāna, when used and used frequently,
completes Sapta Bojjanga. Sapta Bojjanga when used and used frequently, completes the full
release (Nibbāna or Arahanthood)”.
§ Exactly the same statement was made in the WebLink: suttacentral: Ānanda Sutta (SN 54.13).
In fact, most of the suttās in WebLink: suttacentral: Ānāpāna Saṃyutta (SN 54) has that phrase
or the phrase: “..“Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti
mahānisaṃsā“. Here, “mahappalā” (“mahā” + “pala“) means the four Noble stages:
Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, Arahant.
§ Therefore, it is quite clear that ānāpānassati, by itself, can lead to all the way to the
Arahanthood. Thus, one does not need to do “separate vipassana (insight) meditation after
getting to samatha with ānāpānassati” as some suggest.
3. The key question is: “Can breath meditation, by itself, lead to Arahanthood? This is the
critical question that needs to contemplated by those who believe that Ānāpānassati means breath
meditation.
§ Nibbāna is removal of greed, hate, ignorance: “rāgakkhayo dosakkhayo mohakkhayo idaṃ
vuccati nibbānanti“. This verse is in many suttās, for example, in WebLink: suttacentral:
Nibbāna pañhā Sutta (SN 38.1).
§ If Ānāpānassati means breath meditation, how could keeping the mind on one’s breath by itself
REMOVE rāga, dosa, moha from one’s mind?
4. The conventional (and erroneous) teaching in many texts today is that one needs to get to
samādhi with Ānāpānassati and then one needs to do Vipassanā or insight mediation to attain
magga phala.
§ However, from the above discussed suttās it is quite clear that Ānāpānassati by itself can lead
to even the Arahanthood!
§ Of course this erroneous interpretation — that breath meditation is Buddhist Ānāpāna bhāvanā
— is not something that current practitioners came up with. It can be traced back to
Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga, see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“.
5. The incorrect version of Ānāpānassati was there even before the Buddha. In the WebLink:
suttacentral: Arittha Sutta (SN 54.06), the Buddha, upon finding out that Bhikkhu Arittha was
practicing the incorrect breath meditation as Ānāpānassati told him, “..Atthesā, ariṭṭha, ānāpānassati,
nesā natthī’ti vadāmi. Api ca, ariṭṭha, yathā ānāpānassati vitthārena paripuṇṇā hoti taṃ suṇāhi,
sādhukaṃ manasi karohi; bhāsissāmī”ti.
§ Translated, “..There is that ānāpānassati, Arittha. I don’t say that there isn’t. But I will
describe the real (yathā) ānāpānassati, listen and pay close attention. I will speak.”
§ Furthermore, that incorrect version of breath meditation was used by yogis at that time even to
attain higher jhāna. However, those anāriya jhāna are attained by just SUPPRESSING
defilements (keles), and will not lead to ANY magga phala. Those who cultivate such anāriya
jhāna will also have next birth in Brahma realms, but after that they can be reborn even in the
apāyās.
6. The main reason for the incorrect interpretation of Ānāpānassati as breath meditation is that in
many suttās it is described as assāsa/passāsa, which conventionally means taking in/putting out of
something, and particularly to breathing in/breathing out.
§ In fact, āna/āpāna (which rhymes as ānāpāna) also mean taking in/putting out, as we discuss
below.
§ However, in the suttās on Ānāpānassati, assāsa/passāsa or āna/pāna specifically mean taking
in kusala/getting rid of akusala, or, equivalently, taking in the Noble Eightfold Path/discarding
the micchā eightfold path.
§ That should be clear to anyone who knows that Nibbāna is attained via getting rid of dasa
akusala.
7. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Assāsa Sutta (SN38.5), it is specifically said what needs to be “taken
in” (assāsa):
§ “Katamo panāvuso, maggo katamā paṭipadā, etassa assāsassa sacchikiriyāyāti (what needs to
be “taken in”). Ayameva kho, āvuso, ariyo aṭṭhaṅgiko maggo etassa assāsassa sacchikiriyāya
(it is the Noble Eightfold Path that needs to be “taken in”). Seyyathīdaṃ (namely): sammādiṭṭhi
sammāsaṅkappo sammāvācā sammākammanto sammāājīvo sammāvāyāmo sammāsati
sammāsamādhi”. [paṭipadā : (f.) line of conduct; mode of progress. sacchikiriyā : [f.]
realisation; experiencing.]
§ WebLink: suttacentral: Parama assāsa Sutta (AN38.6) has the same statement, emphasizing
with the term “parama” or “superior”.
§ Therefore, there should not be any confusion about what assāsa means.
8. A detailed description of how the cultivation of correct Ānāpānassati leads to Ariya jhānas as well
as magga phala is described in the WebLink: suttacentral: Padīpopama sutta (SN 54.8), also called
the Dipa Sutta.
§ “So satova assāsati, satova passāsati” means “He maintains his mind on dhamma that should
be taken in (kusala or moral) and those that should be gotten rid of (akusala or immoral)”.
§ “paṭinissaggānupassī assasissāmī’ti sikkhati, ‘paṭinissaggānupassī passasissāmī’ti sikkhati”
means, “one cultivates discipline (sikkhati) by removing bonds that binds one to the rebirth
process (patinissaganupassi) by taking in morals (assasissāmi) and getting rid of immorals
(passasissāmi)”.
9. As is the case with many Pāli words, the meaning of the word Ānāpāna is embedded in the word
itself. The two words “āna” and “āpāna” combine to rhyme as ānāpāna. When “sati” is added for
being mindful of that, it becomes ānāpānassati.
§ “Āna” is taking in; In Sinhala, “ānayanaya” is “import”. “Āpāna” is discarding; In Sinhala,
“apanayanaya” is “export”. Thus “āna”+”āpāna” or ānāpāna is “taking in/discarding” or
import/export.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1030 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
§ “Assa” is same as “āna”, and “passa” is the same as “āpāna”. In Sri Lanka, parents tell their
child to clean his/her room by saying, “kāmaraya (room) assa passa (or aspas) karaganna”.
§ When cleaning the room, the child needs to get rid of the clutter (passa), but also can take in
(assa) something like a flower vase to make the room look more pleasant, or to take in a chair
that can be useful.
§ So, one does not throw away everything or take in everything. One needs to be selective in
taking in “good things” and throwing away “bad things”. That is where mindfulness comes in.
That cannot be done with breath.
10. Most people are reluctant to give up the wrong practice of “breath meditation” simply because
they are attached to the “state of well being” that can be reached with breath meditation. But that
relief is only temporary.
§ It is even possible to attain anāriya jhānas with breath meditation, but those jhānas are also
temporary, because the defilements are only SUPPRESSED. On the other hand, the Ariya
jhānas attained via correct Ānāpānasati bhāvanā are permanent even in future rebirths because
deeply-hidden defilements (anusaya) are REMOVED.
§ It must also be mentioned that breath mediation can be used to calm down one’s mind. But one
should not expect to make much progress towards Nibbāna using it. In fact, if one gets
“addicted” to it (as I have seen many people do), it could be a serious distraction to the
Noble Path.
11. As I have emphasized in the “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” and the “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“, one
should not restrict either Ānāpānasati or Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā to formal sessions conducted sitting
down at an isolated place.
§ When the Buddha said, “..Ānāpānassati, bhikkhave, bhāvitā bahulīkatā..” in #2 above, he
meant doing it as much as possible, anywhere possible. That means basically all the time! One
just needs to be mindful of one’s actions, speech, and thoughts, and stop bad ones and
cultivates good ones.
§ This is the fundamental approach to practice, see, “Living Dhamma” section for a step-by-step
process that can be used by even those who do not believe in the basic tenets of Buddha
Dhamma, like rebirth or kamma.
12. Some people believe that Ānāpānasati or Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā should be done in formal
sessions, because of the verse, “Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu aranna gato vā rukkhamüla gato vā
sunnāgāra gato vā nisidati pallankaṃ ābhujitvā, ujuṃ kāyaṃ paṇidhāya, parimukhaṃ satiṃ
upaṭṭhapetvā”, that appears in multiple suttās explaining both Ānāpānassati and Satipattāna
bhāvanā.
§ In most English translations this verse is written as, “There is the case where a monk, having
gone to the wilderness, to the foot of a tree, or to an empty building, sits down folding his legs
crosswise, holding his body erect, and setting mindfulness to the fore”.
§ But there is a deeper meaning to this verse. For example, in the word “rukkhamūla“, “rukkha”
is “tree” and “mūla” is the “root”; even though the top of a tree sways back and forth with the
wind, the tree trunk close to the root is very stable. Thus “rukkhamūla gato vā” means getting
to a stable mindset. In the conventional interpretation is says, “having gone to the foot of a
tree”.
§ The deeper meaning of that complete verse is discussed in detail in, “Prerequisites for the
Satipaṭṭhāna Bhāvanā“. Then the verse can be stated something like, “get into a calm and stable
mindset that is devoid of greed, hate, and ignorance; keep a modest attitude without any sense
of superiority; be forthright and honest, and keep the mind on the main object of cooling down
the mind”. That can be done anywhere, a formal session is not needed, even though that could
be helpful.
§ One could also use the conventional meaning for formal sessions. But of course, it is the deeper
meaning that is much more important even in formal sessions.
13. If anyone has any evidence to the contrary from the Tipiṭaka, please make a comment at the
“Discussion Forum“. I will be happy to address any such issues.
§ Other than the three commentaries (Patisambhidamagga, Petakopadesa, and Nettippakarana)
that are included with the Tipiṭaka, all other commentaries written later have many
inconsistencies and outright misinterpretations; see, for example, “Buddhaghosa’s
Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“.
1. As we discussed in the previous posts of this series, it is important to live a moral life without
engaging in the BIG EIGHT in order to achieve the full benefits of meditation. One could start even
while making progress on the BIG EIGHT, and these formal sessions will help with those as well.
2. Now let us talk about how to do the correct Ānāpānasati meditation as taught by the Buddha; see,
“7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
§ First pick out a quiet time slot that you can allocate without having to worry about other tasks.
Initially, 10-15 minutes a day would be fine and you can extend the time to several hours when
the benefits of proper meditation becomes clear and you start feeling the nirāmisa sukha.
3. Pick out a room away from external disturbances as much as possible. A room that can be
darkened and the door can be closed would be ideal. Sit in a comfortable chair with arm rest, and this
becomes important when one start getting into samādhi, because the body could become less rigid
and tends to slide off (however, some people including myself tend to “freeze” just like in samādhi
statues).
§ Anyway, do not make the chair too comfortable because you may fall asleep. With practice this
sleepiness will automatically go away, when the mind starts liking the meditation sessions, i.e.,
when one of the pancanivarana, thina middha, is automatically removed. One comes out of
samādhi energized.
4. Sit in the chair with the hands on the lap and eyes closed. What we will be trying to do is to ward
off any thoughts of lust, cravings, etc. (kamachanda), any thoughts of hate (vyāpāda) in particular,
and also any stray thoughts such as on kids or other pending tasks. We want to experience the
“cooling down” due to the absence of kamachanda and vyāpāda, and also to focus the mind on a
Dhamma concept. For those who are starting out, it may be good to do the following first:
§ In order to keep the mind from running away, keep saying in your mind, “May all beings be
happy and healthy”. Or, you could think about some act of generosity that you did recently. But
all of a sudden you may drift to a thought of some type of a sensual pleasure (involving any of
the senses). Deliberately get rid of that thought and focus the mind back on the original task.
§ If a hateful thought (towards someone or something) comes to mind, forcefully stop that
thought as well. Here you should deliberately think about good thoughts about that person. It is
important to remember that even the most vile person has friends/family that love that person.
Sincerely say, “May X be happy and healthy”. Even if you have good reasons to despise that
person, it is important to realize that our task is to remove the hateful feelings that WE have.
When we do that, in the future we will not generate strong hateful feelings even if someone
does something that may appear to be against us.
§ Thinking about the serenity of a Buddha statue helps in the case of both kamachanda and
vyāpāda (and any stray thought).
5. Once one gets some practice to sit at one place with a focused mind for a little while, one should
start meditating or contemplating on Dhamma concepts. It may be a good idea to start with the
introductory posts (posts above this post).
§ After that, one could read one of the posts from the “Key Dhamma Concepts” on the top menu
just before the meditation session and then contemplate on those concepts; for example, one
could think about examples on “anicca”: We cannot maintain anything to our satisfaction over
long term. If you are old enough you have many examples on your own. If you are young, you
can still maintain your body, hair, teeth, etc to your liking but when you get to middle age, you
will see that it is an impossible task. The easiest is to think about your parents/grand parents
and see how their bodies have changed, how they are unable to keep their bodies the way they
would like.
§ For this purpose, I have also added new posts on how one can look at the world through
Buddha Dhamma in this section. The posts that I have added after the “Myths about
Meditation” are good ones to read before the session and then to meditate on those ideas; for
example, “A Simple Way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and Avoid Demerits (Akusala)“. The
other three posts below that one may be a bit advanced for some; if so, browse around and find
ones that are suitable. Eventually, the key concepts in the “Key Dhamma Concepts” section
need to be grasped. I encourage everyone to read the posts in the “Moral Living and
Fundamentals” section first.
§ You could actually read any post from any area of the site and use that as a “focal point” on the
meditation session later on. Not all sections are relevant to everyone. Different people can get
to samādhi focusing on different topics. The only posts that is absolutely necessary are the
ones on anicca, dukkha, anatta. But if they are hard to grasp, one should probably start at
the “Moral Living” section. It is a matter of getting used to new concepts. In meditation,
one will automatically “drift to samādhi” when the concepts become clear; the mind
becomes awake and clear.
6. Inevitably, your mind will try to wander off during the session. Stopping lustful and hateful
thoughts is the main task of this formal meditation session. If any distracting thought comes to the
mind, DO NOT let it “run wild”; this is what is called “being mindful”. Keep a sharp eye on
such stray thoughts and put a stop soon as they surface.
§ The other three hindrances (thina midha, uddhacca kukkucca, and vicikicchā) will
automatically come down. You will be surprised how refreshed you feel after a “good
meditation session”.
§ Initially it may be hard, but if you are persistent you should be able to see the results within a
week to a month depending the situation with the BIG EIGHT. Those will also gradually
diminish too.
§ Once one gets the mind to calm down some, one could start focusing on the good/bad habits
that one has, in addition to “taking in” Dhamma concepts.
7. In the Anapanapabba of the Satipaṭṭhāna sutta, it says, “..so sato va assa sati, sato va passa sati.
Digham va assasanto digham assasami ti pajanati, digham va passasanto digham passasami ti
pajanati, ……” Here it DOES NOT mean “take long breaths in, expel long breaths out”; rather it
means, “get rid of old bad habits, and cultivate the old good habits”.
§ Similarly, the very next sentence (“..rassam va assasanto…”) is not about short breaths, but on
those good habits that you started to work on recently, and those bad habits that started to creep
in to your mind recently (if there is any).
§ This is why understanding how habits are formed and becomes āsavas is important; there are
several posts on this subject.
§ There is no way that one can purify one’s mind by breathing in/out, even though it can get
one’s mind to calm down (samatha). The correct way of doing it does both samatha and
vipassana together.
§ In the above verse, sati is a very important term; it is not mere concentration, but contemplation
with an understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta (actually any form of meditation cannot be
done effectively without at least some understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta).
8. The key to success is to do this as often as possible. You do not need to be in a quiet place either,
even though it helps especially initially. As you make progress, try to do it while riding the subway or
a bus (but not while driving!), while waiting at the doctor’s office, during a lunch break, etc.
9. When one starts on Ariya Bhāvanā, sometimes things may look worse before getting better. It is
like trying to cool a hot iron by sprinkling water on it, when all that smoke comes out and may appear
to be getting worse. But one needs to be persistent. One needs to keep in mind that uncountable
beings have attained “cooling down” by having faith in the Buddha.
§ Understanding key Dhamma concepts is key to any type of meditation. Whenever you have
time, try to read on different topics. Things will start “falling into place” at some point, if it
hasn’t yet. From that point on, one will start feeling the joy of Dhamma, and will be seeking to
clarify things with enthusiasm. It is a good addiction to have!
Next, “Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Character and Habits (Gathi)“, ………..
In the post, “Can Buddhist Meditation be Dangerous?” in the Section “Myths or Realities“, I
discussed some possible effects of meditation, both in conventional and in true Buddhist meditations.
Here I will focus on just Buddhist meditation, and explain the physical and mental changes that one
may experience. However, this does not mean everyone will experience these; these symptoms
cannot be generalized, and some may not even feel them.
1. It is possible that one may encounter some soothing physical sensations first and then even some
discomforts, when one starts seriously cleansing one’s mind. I did not want to discuss this topic until
I had enough background material to explain the origins of such effects.
§ Some people may feel such first experiences to be not bad at all, and even get attached to them.
I believe that what is known in Hinduism as “kundalini awakening” is also a manifestation
of this effect. Those are supposed to be encountered in anariya meditation techniques, where
one stops the cleansing process at this stage. It is the goal of most of those non-Buddhist
meditators.
§ Such effects could also be experienced in genuine Buddhist meditation. Then, they may even
turn a bit painful before it gets better. In order to go through such stages and to end up with
genuine tranquility, one needs to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta, and proceed further.
§ Before reading this post, it is advisable to first read the introductory post, “Can Buddhist
Meditation be Dangerous?“, because some body sensations encountered in early stages of
meditation are discussed in that post.
2. Fully understanding the current post requires some background material on the concept of
gandhabba; Click to hear pronunciation:
WebLink: Listen to “Gandhabba” pronounciation
The inert physical body is made alive by the gandhabba (or “manomaya kāya“) that comes out of the
physical body in the case of “out-of-body experiences”; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“.
§ There are many posts at the site that explain various aspects of the gandhabba; see the sections
“Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)“, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“, and “Udayavaya
Ñāṇa“.
§ While it is not necessary to learn about the gandhabba to attain Nibbāna, if one needs to
understand the mechanisms underlying these “meditation experiences”, it is the bridge between
mind and the physical body. In any case, it is good to know about these possible effects
(more of which are discussed below), so that if one gets to experience them, one would not
be perplexed.
3. The gandhabba has a very fine body which is really an invisible blueprint of the physical body.
And that fine body is the one that controls the heavy physical body according to the commands from
the mind, which is also located in the gandhabba (at the hadaya vatthu).
§ The best way to visualize this is to imagine the gandhabba as a fine mesh that overlaps the
physical body; its fine body has all the parts of the physical body, and is able to move any part
that it wishes to move. For example, when the gandhabba moves its fine arm, the physical arm
moves with it.
§ This is how we control our physical bodies. Of course, there are more details with the brain
acting out as an intermediary; see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“.
§ For example, most of the energy to move the heavy body parts comes from the food that we eat. Gandha
4. The nervous system of the physical body overlaps the fine nervous system of the gandhabba, and
tries to maintain that overlap all the time. If one sits down cross-legged, for example, the nervous
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1036 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
system of the physical body may shift from that of the gandhabba. Then the physical nervous system
will try to adjust for that shift, pulling the attached muscles with it.
§ That is why it could become uncomfortable, especially for those who are not used to sit cross-
legged (when one gets used to it, the physical system will learn to adjust quickly).
§ Therefore, this effect does not give an indication of a progress in the meditation program.
Significant effects are discussed below.
5. Our thoughts (i.e., the cittaja kaya) can influence the fine body (utuja kaya) of the gandhabba. In
fact, the utuja kaya arises out of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] produced by the cittaja kaya and the
kammaja kaya.
§ Thus the fine body of the gandhabba can be affected by two methods: by the kammaja
kaya (i.e. by kamma vipāka) AND by the cittaja kaya or according to how we think.
§ The first effect can bring about aches and pains in the physical body due to kamma vipāka (by
shifting the gandhabba‘s body to out-of-balance in a short time, so we can feel the shift). These
are mostly experienced as we get old (e.g., chronic back pains) and are of course not due to
meditation. Some of these may get better with meditation.
6. In addition to the shifts caused by kamma vipāka, we can change the equilibrium position of
the gandhabba‘s fine nervous system with consistent thoughts over long periods of time. For
example, if we think hateful thoughts a lot, the nervous system of the gandhabba may twist in a
certain way; if we think mostly greedy thoughts, it may shift in a different way.
§ Thus, as we think defiled thoughts and act on them on a regular basis, it leads to gradual
twisting of nerve bundles in the gandhabba, and physical muscles also get twisted accordingly.
Since it is a gradual process compared to the first effect, we do not normally feel it (until we get
old).
§ However, when we start cleansing our minds the fine body of the gandhabba tries to come back
to its equilibrium position. During a good meditation session, this can happen fairly quickly and
that when one starts feeling such nerve (and muscle) movements. We are basically trying to
“undo” those twists in nerve bundles that occurred over years and years.
§ This is why this effect is much less in young children. Their nerves have not yet being shifted
too much.
7. Thus the second effect has its origins in our thoughts. Normally such effects occur above the
waist, along the spine, neck, and in the head. This is related to the fact nerve bundles propagate
through the spine and also there are cranial nerves in the brain. Thus Kundalini awakening is an
example of this category.
§ This effect is experienced by different meditators somewhat differently. But the dominant
feature is the “pressure waves” that arise above the waist, and normally located around the
spine, neck, throat, and the head. These have been attributed to energy centers or “chakras” in
Kundalini awakening; see, “WebLink: wiki: Kundalini“.
§ That is why they say that the kundalini energy is “uncoiled” (or “awakened”) during
meditation. But this is nothing more than the out-of-balance nervous systems coming back to
the equilibrium position. In anariya meditations there is not much further cleansing possible,
because in order to proceed further, one needs to comprehend the anicca nature of this world.
8. In Buddhist or Ariya meditations, one should start contemplating on the anicca nature when one
starts any type of body sensations. Any type of body sensations means the mind is beginning to
affect the body, and that one has made progress in the cleansing process. Of course those Hindu
yogis who got to this stage had prevented from immoral acts and suppressed such thoughts, and thus
had gained a tranquility of mind at least temporarily.
§ But if one does not cleanse one’s mind in a permanent way, with the comprehension of the true
nature of this world (anicca, dukkha, anatta), such corrections are temporary and can go right
back to the twisted positions. Thus such effects can be re-experienced in varying degrees.
9. When one starts comprehending the anicca nature, this “unwinding process” can accelerate (and
the body sensations too), and this is when one may even start feeling significant discomfort or even
mild pain.
§ If the body is really “out-of-alignment”, the realignment process can lead to different types
sensations; some may be mild, but some could be even a bit painful.
10. Many people experience sweating, which is definitely part of the “cleansing process”. Our defiled
thoughts lead to the generation of “impurities” in various body sites. The pure citta generated in
meditation can burn them and the body will get rid of the waste via sweat too. Thus sweating is also
possible during a good meditation session (in the early stages of progress; of course all these go away
eventually).
§ Another related symptom is becoming thirsty during a good session; mouth can get dry. It is
good to keep a glass of water close-by if that is the case.
§ By the way, one can move around even while in a jhāna. In fact, when one cultivates the jhāna,
one can open eyes and not be bothered by it. I can confirm that. In fact, those who have
abhiññā powers are said to be able to do regular work while using abhiññā powers.
§ For example, a famous story in the Tipiṭaka describes how Ven. Chullapanthaka had created
thousand copies of himself with abhiññā powers and how they were all sweeping the temple
premises.
11. Here is another experience that I have heard people described according to my teacher Thero’s
recorded desanās:
§ “Something propagated from the neck area to the top of the head and stayed there during the
session. This happened during subsequent sessions too”. Such a “propagation” is probably more
like a “pressure wave”. This is another “kundalini type” effect.
§ When these “pressure waves” are strong, it may be a bit painful too. But be rest assured that
those effects will gradually go away as one continues when the nervous system comes back to
equilibrium. However, if such sensations persist outside the mediation session it may be a good
idea to go for a medical examination, since it could be due to a medical condition.
12. There is actually a way to reduce these sensations to some extent. This was suggested by my
teacher Thero in a desanā that I listened to. Even if one meditates with the eyes closed (as most
people should do in early stages), the eye balls inside eyelids are in constant motion; they move
around a lot.
§ One should try to focus the eyes to the nose area. This is done sort of by one’s mind, but the
eye balls then keep steady pointing towards to nose. In my case it stopped most of the
sensations in the head. Eventually, of course these sensations go away, once one attains
“equilibrium”. Then one can proceed even with the eyes open, but still focused towards the
nose/mouth area.
§ Now I do not have any of those “pressure waves” that experienced in the throat area and
recently those in the head area also went away.
§ By the way, I have not been able to make it past the third jhāna for the past year and a half or
so, even though I am making progress (jhānas have three levels: weak, medium, and strong).
Getting to the fourth Ariya jhāna means one has reached the Anāgāmī stage, where one loses
desire for all sense pleasures (i.e, transcend kāma loka).
13. Our thoughts or our “cittaja kaya” is the most important of the four types of “kaya” that we have.
For a discussion of those four types of bodies, see, “Āhāra (Food) in Udayavaya Ñāṇa“, in the
Section: Udayavaya Ñāṇa.
§ As discussed there, our physical bodies (karaja kaya) that we value so much are there only for
about 100 years, while our human bhava or human existence can possibly last many hundreds
of years. The other three types of bodies of kaya that we have are kammaja kaya, cittaja kaya
and utuja kaya. All three of these prevail through the whole human bhava (of course they
undergo constant change); they make a “big transition” when a new bhava is grasped at the
cuti-paṭisandhi moment).
§ And it is this cittaja kaya (or basically our thought stream) that is the most important. If we use
the cittaja kaya wisely we can make progress in our mundane lives as well as in pursuing
Nibbāna. We will discuss this in detail in the last post in on the Udayavaya Ñāṇa in an
upcoming post.
14. The key point here is that if one starts feeling these body sensations, one has cleansed the mind to
the point of being able to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta (or any other Dhamma concept) with
more ease; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“, and the post discussed there.
§ At this stage (i.e., when feeling thirst, sweating, body sensations, etc), one is likely to be
somewhere around “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and Character (Gati)” in
the meditation section.
§ Of course it is also possible that one could have already comprehended anicca, dukkha, anatta
and has attained the Sotāpanna stage without any such symptoms. Each person needs to decide
that for him/herself; see, “How Does One Know whether the Sotāpanna Stage is Reached?“.
The fundamental guide is whether one has removed those “apāyagami gathi” via cleansing the
mind. The physical body may or may not give those clues that we discussed above.
§ For attaining magga phala, jhānas are not necessary. Furthermore, Ariya jhānas cannot be
attained without attaining at least the Sotāpanna stage first; see, “11. Magga Phala and Ariya
Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ Mental (and associated physical) phenomena are highly personal. Thus above discussed
symptoms may or may not be experienced by a given person.
1. Here is a good place to see why the Buddha rejected both the concept of a “self” AND a “no-
self” (or “soul” AND “no-soul”). We first need to realize that the task of purifying the mind is very
personal; only you know about your mind and only you can purify it. The perception of a “no-self” is
a bad starting point to do this cleansing.
§ We can easily see that “a person” changes over time, both physically and mentally (see the next
post). Thus it is easy to see that a concept of a “soul” or “self” does not hold water.
§ However, each of us is DIFFERENT, and UNIQUE; no two are the same even at a fixed time.
Even though each person changes, the change itself is unique to “that person” and CAN BE
initiated by that person. What makes one person different from another is his/her character
(gathi).
§ For those people who say, “there is no-self” or “there is no real me”, I ask: “Then is it OK if
someone hits you with a stick or hurt you badly in some way?”. Obviously, that is not fine. Just
by denying something that is as real as suffering itself, will not make the problem go away. Just
being philosophical is not going to make the problem disappear.
§ This is why the Buddha rejected both extremes of “self” and “no-self”.
2. Actually as one increasingly realizes the fruitlessness of struggling to seek sense pleasures, the
feeling of “self” starts to decrease. An Arahant is the closest to a “self-less person”; but even an
Arahant has some unique character qualities: nothing to do with greed, hate, and delusion, but more
like kammically neutral habits.
§ For example, there is this story about a very young Arahant. One day a man came to take this
bhikkhu to his house for a “dāna”, which consists of a lunch followed by a gift (usually things
that are needed for a bhikkhu like a robe, a towel, etc). On the way, they ran into some puddles
on the ground and the young bhikkhu jumped over one. The man thought, “Oh, this bhikkhu is
not even disciplined let alone having any magga phala; maybe I should not give him the gift”.
They came across a few more puddles and the bhikkhu went around them. So, the man asked,
“Why did you jump over only that one?”. The bhikkhu told him, “If I jumped over anymore
puddles, I would probably lose my lunch too”. It turned out that the bhikkhu was an Arahant
with abhiññā powers and read the man’s mind! Also it is said that the bhikkhu was born a
monkey for many lives in the recent past, and he still had that sansāric “monkey habit” of
jumping over things.
3. Habits are formed via repeated use. The Buddha said, “yā yan taṇhā pono bhavitha…..” or “bhava
or habits are formed by taṇhā for various things, activities. Remember that Taṇhā means “getting
attached to something via greed, hate, of ignorance”; see, “Taṇhā – How we Attach via Greed, Hate,
and Ignorance“.
4. What we are concerned about is only getting rid of immoral habits and cultivating moral habits.
This will make oneself a “better person” long before one even thinks about attaining Nibbāna. This
can be done with simple process called “āna-pāna” or “taking in good habits” and “discarding bad
habits”.
§ The Buddha said, “bhāve thabbancha bhavithan, pahee thabbancha paheenan” or “keep doing
what is good, get rid of those that are not good”. The meaning is a bit deeper than that because
“bhāve” there refers to making “bhava”. The more one does something, it becomes one’s
“bhava”. And the less one willfully stops doing, that “bhava” tends to go away. This is what the
neurologists are re-discovering today; see, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific
View“.
5. The bad habits need to be stopped each time it surfaces, right there. The Buddha said, “ette san
uppajjamana uppajati, paheeyamana paheeyathi” or “each time a “san” (a bad habit) resurfaces, it
needs to be recognized and stopped right then”.
§ Therefore, one must do this not only in sitting meditation sessions, but as much as possible,
whenever possible.
§ This is what the Buddha also meant by “asevitaya, bhavithaya, bahuleekathaya”, or “associate,
use, and do as much as possible whenever possible” everything that helps with Ānāpānasati.
These are described in the post, “Habits, Goals. and Character (Gathi)”.
6. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of understanding what is truly involved in ānāpānasati.
The recent findings on the workings of the brain really helps clarify and highlight some key points
that the Buddha emphasized. I think it will help anyone understand the process much better. But first
we will take a brief look at how these character qualities are inherited.
Next, “A Broad View of the “Person” Trying to be a “Better Person”“, ……….
11.11.2 A Broad View of the “Person” Trying to be a “Better Person”
1. Let us see how and why we act with greed, hate, and ignorance. Stated simply, all we do during a
day does not happen by chance.
§ Our actions are based on our “character” (more correctly gati) AND “our way of thinking
about this world based on our views about the world”; “gati” is pronounced as “gati”.
§ For example, if one does not believe in a rebirth process, or the law of kamma (that each action
has consequences), then it may be easier to seek enjoyment at the expense of other beings.
2. What our character or world view today is due to a complex combination of many things, but the
main factors are: (i) sansāric habits (also called gati and āsavas), (ii) biological parents who provide
parts of the physical body (this is also related to kamma vipāka), (iii) the environment that one grew
up AND the current environment (i.e., physical environment and people one associates with).
§ Even though the complexity of a “person” cannot be reduced to simple things, those are major
ones. As the Buddha pointed out in the Sabbasava sutta (see, “Habits, Goals. and Character
(Gathi)”), the main things that CAN BE changed NOW are “physical environment and people
one associates with” which is a part of (iii) above. If we are talking about a child, then (iii)
applies in its entirety.
§ Once these “external influences” are taken care of, next is to purify the mind by “taking in”
good things and “discarding” bad things or “ānāpāna“; see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
3. When we are conceived in the mother’s womb, a “blueprint” of the new life is in the form of a
manomaya kāya (which is made of undetectably fine matter) descends to the womb and combines
with the zygote formed by the combination of an egg from the mother and the sperm from the father.
§ This manomaya kāya is the same as gandhabba or paṭisandhi viññāna.
4. The manomaya kāya comes with three rūpa kalapas called the kaya dasaka (blueprint for the
physical body), bhava dasaka (whether male or female), and vatthu dasaka (mind element, which has
the “gati” in it) that were determined by the kamma vipāka that led to the birth; we will discuss these
later in the Abhidhamma section.
§ Thus the physical body of the new life is now going to be affected by not only the kaya dasaka,
but also the genetic material in the egg and the sperm (DNA of the parents). As the fetus grows,
it will also be affected by the food intake by the mother as well as her mental state, home
environment, etc. After the birth until death, the physical body (as well as the mind) will be
affected by many other factors including the diet and the environment.
§ This is discussed in detail at: “Buddhist Explanations of Conception, Abortion, and
Contraception“.
5. Thus there is no “unchanging self” either mentally or physically; everything is in constant flux. But
one cannot say “there is no-self” either because the character qualities (gati and āsava) that comes in
with the manomaya kāya will keep “evolving”; even though they change, there is a continuation of a
particular lifestream.
§ Each person or animal that born is unique with a complex set of mental and physical parameters
that evolve moment-to-moment like a flowing river; see, “What Reincarnates? Concept of a
Lifestream”.
§ We will discuss some of these factors in various sections, but the key point I wanted to get
across is the fact that each person has a unique set of character qualities (gati and āsava) that
have evolved over uncountable number of lives in the past. And those are the key to one’s
destiny. One has the power to change those.
6. What makes one person different from another is this set of “gati and āsava”, which can be loosely
translated as, “character qualities and deep-seated cravings”. Some people are calm and quiet while
others are rough and boisterous; some like music while other like to watch things or engage in
physical activities; the possibilities are endless and there are innumerable combinations of them. That
is why each person is different.
§ Hidden in these apparently harmless “habits” and “cravings” are the defilements or the
tendencies to engage in certain types of activities that are harmful to oneself or the others.
§ The key is to focus on the glaring character flaws first: if one engaged in activities such as
fishing or hunting, that means willfully taking the life of other beings for one’s pleasure. Does
that makes sense within the wider world view of any given being repeatedly born in any of the
31 realms? Within that broader view, we can see that any animal, how small or insignificant,
has an attachment to its life; and we could have had that very life in the past.
§ Take another example of a transaction between two people. The goal should be to make a
decent profit for oneself making sure one covers the cost and make enough profit to “stay in
business and provide for the family”, but not to make the transaction too burdensome on the
other party. As we discussed in the post, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation”, one could get into
deep debt to other people and beings by exploiting them in many different ways.
7. The easiest way to deal with this is to look at each action mindfully and decide whether that act is
“fair” to everyone involved. Of course one could check to see any of the ten defilements (dasa
akusala) are committed by that action; see, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)“.
§ As I keep saying, one needs to focus on the more extreme violations first. There is no point in
worrying about inadvertently killing some insects while gardening if one is engaged in lying
and deceit or killing animals for pleasure. It is good to get an idea of the severity of different
acts; see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma”.
8.This is why it is important to learn Dhamma as much as possible, while engaging in
meditation. The Path becomes clear as one learns the subtleties in key Dhamma concepts.
§ I am amazed how much I learn each and every day; it is like a picture becoming clearer
by the day. You start to see the even smallest detail, and instead of becoming distraught
you get a sense of clarity and peacefulness by cleansing the mind. You realize that no one
is perfect until the Arahanthood and the key is to make progress, no matter where you are.
Each step in the right direction makes you feel better.
Next, “How Habits are Formed and Broken – A Scientific View“, ……….
11.11.3 How Character (Gathi) Leads to Bhava and Jathi
1. One of the special knowledges that the Buddha gained at the Enlightenment was the āsavakkhaya
ñāṇa. This is the key to stop the suffering FROM ARISING via getting rid of the deep-seated
cravings (āsava) that we all have. Āsavakkhaya ñāṇa (“āsava” + “khaya“, where “khaya” is the
opposite of “san“; see, “What is “San”?) is the knowledge on how to remove those cravings (āsava).
2. Throughout the site, I keep emphasizing the importance of understanding (not memorizing) the
meanings of the key Pāli words like gathi, anusaya, āsava, bhava, jāti, saṃsāra, and dukkha; they are
intimately inter-connected in many ways including paṭicca samuppāda. The way to stop future
suffering (dukkha) from arising and reach Nibbāna is to break the perpetual cycle that lead to a new
jāti (birth) at each death.
§ Our problems do not go away at death (committing suicide is a bad idea); they merely get
started in a new phase with a new body, which could be worse than what we have now; see,
“What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ The connections among bhava and jāti on one side and āsava, anusaya, and gathi on the other
side are intimate, and need to be understood well; see, “Sansāric Habits, Character (Gathi), and
Cravings (Āsava)“, before reading the rest of this post.
3. And this understanding is needed even if one is not seriously thinking about Nibbāna. The
whole key to suffering in general is embedded in these intricate relationships.
§ Bhava and jāti also happen during this very life; jāti could mean birth of a new desire; see,
“Idappaccayatā Paṭicca Samuppāda” and “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“.
§ It may be a bit confusing at first for a new person to this site, but have patience and read the
inter-connected posts; I have links everywhere to pertinent posts/material. Once you get an idea
of the underlying connections, it will clarify everything, like a fog being lifted.
§ I have set up links to open in new windows, so that you can go back forth between posts easily
and try to “fill-in-the-gaps”.
4. A perpetual cycle that is ever-present in the sansāric cycle of rebirths is described in the following
verse:
“uppado pavattan, pavatta nimittan
nimitta paṭisandhi, paṭisandhi gathi”
§ “Uppada” means arising. When anusaya (temptations) arise due to āsava (cravings), we need
to stop that temptation and break the cycle at “pavattan” (which means keeping it or go with it).
§ If we go along with the temptation (“pavatta”), then it becomes a nimitta (literally a “sign”). A
nimitta is a characteristic that is associated with that particular act. For example, for an
alcoholic a picture of an alcohol bottle or a bar (or where one normally drinks), or even seeing a
friend with whom one drinks often, can be a nimitta; when any of such a “symbol” comes to the
mind, it reminds of the drinking act and gets one in the “mood”.
5. Most times, the paṭisandhi (linking of the next rebirth) takes place via a nimitta; this is what is
meant by “nimitta paṭisandhi” above. At the dying moment, what comes to the mind is likely to be
something that one does often, and that could become the link to the next life.
§ A drug addict, if he/she is lucky to be born human again, will be attracted to a mother who is a
drug addict.
§ For a person with lot of hate, what comes to the mind at the dying moment could be a picture of
an arch enemy; then the kammic power shows him a gun or a knife and he will be likely to
attack the person with that weapon (in a dream-like state); the next moment he will be in an
apāya (hell), which is the “matching place”.
6. The worse thing is that the old habits continue and even strengthened in this new life; this is what
is meant by “paṭisandhi gathi” above. Suppose that drug addict who was born to an addicted mother
is adopted by another family and raised in a drug-free environment. Still, if that child becomes
exposed to drugs later in his life, he could be tempted to use drugs because of his sansāric habit.
§ This is the danger in the rebirth process or saṃsāra; one keeps going down the slippery slope
unless one changes one’s habits with effort. And reversing that trend can be done only in a
human life.
§ Sentient beings in most realms do not act willfully but according to their sansāric habits. We
can see only the animal realm and clear that they do things mechanically (almost like robots,
but not quite only because they have FEELINGS). Only the beings in higher realms have
genuine free-will and it is optimum for the humans.
§ You can see that many animals have unique characteristics: such characteristics and habits are
associated with that particular existence (bhava). For example, some types of birds have been
building the same type of nests from beginningless time through countless world cycles; but
they are unable to make it any better. Migrating birds know exactly where to fly. New born
turtles head to the sea right after the eggs are hatched; see the video:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: New Born, Baby Sea Turtles Race to the Ocean!
7. However, humans can change their destiny. They have free will and the ability to come up with
“new ideas”. We keep building new things, discovering new things, and making progress.
§ We need to keep in mind that we can also purify our minds and become free of this unending
and suffering-laden rebirth process. If we ever get a birth in one of the lower realms, we will be
stuck there for a long time to come.
§ The way to purify our minds is to get rid of bad habits. Excessive greed (this include addictions
to anything including food, money, property, alcohol, drugs, etc) and anger are the first two
things one needs to work on.
§ This does not mean one has to give away one’s wealth; just don’t be too attached to them. One
has “earned” that wealth from previous good deeds, so one does not need to feel bad about it.
But those things last only about 100 years, and who knows what we will inherit in the next life.
8. And the key to be permanently free of the apāyas is to get rid of those bad character qualities
(gathi) that can give us birth in those four realms.
§ We can avoid the niraya (hell) by getting rid of hate; we can stay away from peta (hungry
ghost) worlds by getting rid of greed, we can make sure to not get a birth in the asura realm by
not getting “free rides”, and making our own living honestly (“a”+”süra” means “not able” or
those who depend on others).
§ An animal birth results from gathi that have all three roots of greed, hate, and ignorance; animal
realm is called “thirisan” in Pāli or Sinhala: “thiri” is three and “san” is greed, hate, and
ignorance, thus an animal birth is caused by gathi that have all three immoral roots.
§ In the same way, we can make it possible to be born a deva by being generous to others; we can
make it possible to become a brahma by cultivating metta, karuna, mudita, upekkha; and we
can optimize chances for a human birth by cultivating wisdom as well.
9. But no matter how well we live this life, we do not know what kind of “kammic baggage” that we
carry from previous lives. Thus the only way to avoid the four lower realms (apāyas) with
CERTAINTY is to attain the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna. And we can do this by comprehending
anicca, dukkha, anatta, the true nature of this world.
§ When one truly comprehends anicca, dukkha, anatta, one’s mind automatically rejects actions
that are bound to maintain and cultivate bad gathi, and will encourage actions that will cultivate
good gathi. If this is done to the level of getting rid of the four greedy citta with wrong vision
and the citta with vicikicchā, then one becomes PERMANENTLY free of the apāyas; see,
“Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“.
10. Finally, here is another interesting video from the animal world which shows how ants build
sophisticated cities. But unlike humans, the ability to do that does not come from ingenious minds;
ants have been doing the same from eternity. It is a “characteristic” that is naturally associated with
the “ant bhava“. Each ant “knows” what to do, just like the baby turtles who race to the sea just after
being hatched. It is the same with how birds know where to fly in their long migrations.
§ There is so much that the Buddha explained to the world, but the world is still unaware of.
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Giant Ant Hill Excavated
11. More details on the importance of gathi in the rebirth process are discussed in, “Patisandhi Citta –
How the Next Life is Determined According to Gathi“.
Karaniya Metta Sutta is one of the popular suttas in Buddhist countries. However, like many suttas,
it has not been appropriately translated properly in most current English translations.
1. First of all, the actual name of the sutta is Karaniyamattha Sutta. It comes from “karaniyama”
meaning “essential to do” (කල යුතුම (kalayutuma means “requires”) in Sinhala) and “attha”
meaning “oneself.” That means this sutta summarizes what one must do (to make progress on the
Path). But this is not a significant error since Metta bhāvanā is there too.
§ Those “requirements” are stated in the first three verses.
§ The actual ctual “Metta bhāvanā” part is in verses 4 through 8.
§ Verse 9 says that one should do this bhāvanā in all four postures. This bhāvanā is the “Brahma
Vihāra” or “living like a Brahma” or “living with the mindset of a Brahma.”
§ Verse 10: When one fulfills the “requirements” at the basic level, one will get to the Sotāpanna
stage. With the cultivation of Metta bhāvanā one will get to be an Anāgāmi (not born in a
womb again).
Pali English
Karaṇīyamattha kusalena, What kusala should be done by one who is seeking
Yantam santaṃ padaṃ
cooling down (by seeing the unfruitful nature of this
1 abhisamecca;
Sakko ujū ca suhujū ca, world) : moral, upright and disciplined, with pleasing
Sūvaco cassa mudu anatimānī manners andhumble .
Santussako ca subharo ca, Always happy, bearing only good (gati), with few
mundane duties and simple life, with senses calmed and
2 Appakicco ca sallaukavutti; a cooled mind, with few burdens (possessions), and
Santindriyo ca nipako ca, treating everyone the same (regardless of race, color,
Appagabbho kulesuananugiddho etc.).
Na ca khuddamsamācare kiñci, Not engaging in harmful/lowly actions (and this thought
Yena viññū pare upavadeyyuṃ;
3 Sukhino va khemino hontu, that one always holds), may all beings attain Nibbāna
(and get to the ultimate happiness).
Sabbe sattā bhavantu sukhitattā
Ye keci pāṇabhūtatthi,
Tasā vā thāvarā vā anavasesā; Whoever there may be with a breath of life , trapped by
4 Dīghā vā ye mahantā vā, greed for so long in sansāra, may they be free of fear and
Majjhimā rassakāṇukathūlā greed without exception.
Diṭṭhā vā ye va adiṭṭhā, Those who are seen or unseen, those dwelling far or near,
Ye ca dūre vasanti avidūre;
5 Bhūtā vā sambhavesī vā, those born as well as those seeking birth (gandhabbā),
Sabbe sattā bhavantu sukhitattā may all beings attain Nibbāna.
Na paroparaṃ nikubbetha, May no one deceive another, treat everyone like close
6 Nātimaññetha katthacinam kañci; relatives. May they not wish each other harm, and by
Byārosanā paṭighasañña, seeing the unfruitful nature of this world, may they be
Nāññamaññassa dukkhamiccheyya free of suffering.
Mātā yathā niyaṃputtam
7 āyusā ekaputtamanurakkhe;
Evampi sabbabhūtesu,
Just as a mother would protect her only child with her life,
may this protection affect all beings on an equal footing.
Mānasaṃbhāva ye aparimāṇaṃ
Pali English
Mettañca sabbalokasmim, May all cultivate mettā towards all beings on an equal
ye aparimāṇaṃ;
8 Mānasaṃbhāva
Uddhaṃ adho ca tiriyañca,
footing, those who live above, below, or across. May all
Note: The pdf file of the sutta itself can be downloaded here: “WebLink: PDF File: Karaniya Metta
Sutta.”
2. Deeper explanations are in some words like “abhisamecca” (“abhi” + “san” + “avecca”), and
“dukkhamicceyya” (“dukkham” + “avecceyya”).
§ Avecca is the keyword in both cases, and I discussed the deep connection to “icca” and thus
Tilakkhaṇa in the post, “Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna” (starting at #9 in
the post).
§ If anyone needs more explanations of other words, we can discuss it at the discussion forum,
but we will look at one more next.
3. Another keyword is “mānasaṃbhāva,” which comes from “mānasan” and “bhava“, meaning
one’s mind (ideally) does not contaminate beyond the “mānasaṃ” stage.
§ When thoughts (citta) arise, they get contaminated within a fraction of a second due to one’s
gati. That is discussed in the post, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta).”
§ Therefore, the goal is to improve one’s gati, so that one’s citta will not contaminate beyond
the “mānasaṃ” stage (reached the Arahant stage). One should strive to approach that
mindset right now, at least while meditating.
As one gets closer to that stage, one will have true mettā AUTOMATICALLY for increasingly
§
more and more living beings. At Arahanthood, one will have boundless mettā to all:
“mānasaṃbhāva ye aparimāṇaṃ.”
4. The first three verses in the sutta state how one gets to the Sotāpanna stage by getting to the
Ariyakanta sīla (unbreakable moral conduct). That is when one will have aveccappasāda
(unbreakable faith in the Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha). That is discussed in detail in the post,
“Sotapatti Anga – The Four Qualities of a Sotāpanna.”
§ Then by cultivating mettā, one can gradually get rid of kāma rāga and get to the Sakadāgāmi
and Anāgāmi stages.
§ However, this is an excellent sutta to listen to and to recite even before getting to the
Sotāpanna stage. It is better to recite Pāli verses with an understanding of the meaning of
those verses. The sound itself is beneficial, especially when pronounced correctly, as done by
the Thero in the recording below.
§ It is also good to play the recording in the background while doing other things or during
meditation. In Asian countries, this is one of the suttas being played in the mornings, while
everyone is getting ready to go to school or work.
5. A recital of the sutta by Waharaka Thero is below:
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1047
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
July 30, 2015 : I have re-written the two posts #10 and #11 (previously titled, “10. Magga Phala and
Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga” and “11. How to Select and “Grow” Meditation
Procedures for Magga Phala”) that were originally written some time back with different titles. Over
the past two months, I have been able to clarify some subtle issues in both my own experience and
also in the technical details. Revised August 5, 2017; September 19, 2018 (updated links).
§ First the order of things: samādhi, magga phala, and then Ariya jhānas in that order; see,
“Possible Outcomes of Meditation – Samādhi, Jhāna, Magga Phala“.
§ Thus jhānas (Ariya or anariya) are not necessary to attain the Sotāpanna stage; see the posts in
the “Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna” section for details on this and many other aspects.
1. First, it would be very difficult to get to even a state of samādhi if one is not keeping up at least the
“conventional” five precepts: abstaining from killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, and using
drugs or getting intoxicated. Those things make the mind restless, and makes it hard for the mind to
focus attention (the five hindrances “cover the mind”). It should also be noted that just strictly
obeying the five precepts may not be effective if one’s mind is full of jealousy, extreme greed, hate,
etc.; see, “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them“.
§ Just like one cannot see the bottom of a well if it is highly contaminated, the mind (and the
body) will not “feel anything” even in a formal meditation session if the mind is “highly
contaminated”. And there is no point in trying to take out the “small defilements” (such as
abstaining from taking a glass of wine) if one is engaged in immoral activities.
§ When the “big defilements” are removed, one starts seeing a little bit further down the well;
similarly, one’s mind will become lighter, with less stress, even when not in a formal
meditation session. When one sits down in a quiet place, it will become easier to get to some
kind of “samādhi”, or tranquility.
§ The Buddha said that “kusala sīla” leads to tranquility of the body and mind, which in turn
leads to samādhi. The “kusala sīla” accomplished via gaining Sammā Diṭṭhi (to some extent) is
all that is needed to attain the upacara samādhi needed for the Sotāpanna magga/phala. All
three sanyojana that are removed at the Sotāpanna stage (sathkaya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, silabbata
paramasa) are associated with wrong vision or diṭṭhi.
2. Many people have the idea that one needs to “get to samādhi” using a separate meditation
technique such as the conventional breath meditation. Even though one could do that, it would be a
waste of time. One can get to samādhi just by listening or reading attentively to CORRECT dhamma.
§ There is not even a single reference in the Tipiṭaka, where the Buddha asked anyone to do a
“samatha bhāvanā” first and then to “vipassana bhāvanā“. When one comprehends Dhamma,
one’s mind get calm and through that samatha state, one can get to magga phala.
§ After attaining the Sotāpanna stage, one can get to Ariya jhānas by focusing on that “state of
cooling down” that one has already attained to some extent, to get to jhānas.
§ One really needs formal meditation techniques to attain higher magga phala, i.e., above the
Sotāpanna stage; the reason will become clear shortly. However, it is fine to do formal
meditation even to attain the Sotāpanna stage. In the following, I will describe what I actually
went through.
3. To get to samādhi, contemplating on Dhamma concepts will make it easier and faster. Also, one
will be able to stay in “meditation” for a longer time. This is called by different names: insight
meditation (vipassana), many forms of “anupassana”, and cultivating the “dhamma vicaya”
sabbojjanga. Concomitantly, one needs to do the correct version of “Ānāpānasati” at all times.
§ In principle, working towards the Sotāpanna stage does not require any formal meditation
techniques even though meditation can help ; there have been countless people who attained
the Sotāpanna or even higher stages of Nibbāna just by listening to a Dhamma discourse.
§ It is quite important to understand this point. Many people have one or more of the following
misconceptions about reaching the Sotāpanna stage: (i) one needs to give up all worldly
possessions, (ii) one needs to become a bhikkhu or live in seclusion, (iii) one needs to do
various types of meditation techniques.
§ In order to clarify this issue, let us examine what is actually involved in attaining the Sotāpanna
stage.
4. Nibbāna is reached via removal of āsavas (āsavakkhaya); see, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent
Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“.
§ Out of the four āsavas that we have, only one is removed at the Sotāpanna stage: dittasava or
the craving for wrong worldviews. In the Sabbasava Sutta, this is referred to as removal by
clear vision (“dassanena pahathabba”, where dassanena is vision and pahathabba is removal).
§ The other three āsavas of kamasava (craving for sense pleasures), bhavasava (craving to live
somewhere in the 31 realms of this world), and avijjasava (ignorance of anicca, dukkha,
anatta) are removed in the higher stages of Nibbāna; see the above post.
5. The key point is that one does “apayagami apuññābhisaṅkhāra” (or strong immoral deeds that
makes one eligible to be born in the lower four realms) only when one has wrong worldviews.
Contrary to most people’s beliefs, one does not need to lose craving for sense pleasures to attain the
Sotāpanna stage. Kamasava is reduced in stages in the Sotāpanna and Sakadāgāmī stages and is
removed only at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ This is why learning dhamma concepts and getting rid of “diṭṭhis” or “wrong views” is key in
attaining the Sotāpanna stage, as I emphasized in several posts; if you enter “diṭṭhi” in the
Search box on the top right, you will see many relevant posts.
§ We all have many diṭṭhis. These can be removed only via learning the true nature of this world,
i.e., by learning Dhamma.
§ One meaning of Sotāpanna (“sota” + “paññā“) is “one who has cultivated wisdom by listening
to Dhamma”; in the days of the Buddha that was how one learned Dhamma, by listening.
6. Even before meeting my teacher Thero, I had been thinking about dhamma concepts for 3-4 years
and had been trying to get a consistent picture in my mind. Even at that time, I could easily get to
samādhi because my mind was totally focused.
§ When I “got stuck” trying to figure out what a certain concept means in relation to others, I
would look through books and also listen to desanās (discourses) on the internet. It is at this
stage that I realized that most of the explanations did not make sense, and of course were not
consistent with other key concepts.
§ To give an example, I had a hard time in explaining the rebirth stories by so many children. If
“being born human” is so difficult as explained in many suttas (see, “How the Buddha
Described the Chance of Rebirth in the Human Realm“), then how can all those children
remember their recent past lives? Furthermore, there were “gaps” from the time they died in the
previous life to the time they were born in this life.
§ Once I met my teacher Thero, I was able to clarify that issue along with numerous others: Birth
is different from “human bhava“; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births
Therein“. Also, when one dies and has energy left in the “human bhava“, one becomes a
gandhabba and has to wait until a suitable womb becomes available; see, “Mental Body –
Gandhabba“.
§ Thus rebirth in the human realm does not happen instantaneously; one could in the gandhabba
state for years before a suitable womb is found. And one can be born in the human realm many
times before the kammic energy for that “human bhava” is exhausted.
7. However, I was able to get to samādhi even before many of these issues were resolved. I was
making steady progress with the concepts I could grasp. I would sit at the desk and contemplate and I
could feel my body getting lighter and mind becoming calm. I realized that it was better than just
wasting time doing the “breath meditation”.
§ If I sat in a quiet place and meditated (contemplated about a Dhamma concept), my mind would
“latch on to it” and I could get to possibly an anariya jhānic experience. That started about a
year before I learned the true meanings of “anicca, dukkha, anatta”.
§ It started with “tingling sensations inside my brain”; I just could feel things happening there.
And then I could feel “needle pricks” all over the body and my body would start “freezing”
mostly the upper body. These “symptoms” are not common to all.
§ Learning Dhamma is a critical part of “kusala sīla” especially for the Sotāpanna stage. Kusala
sīla automatically leads to samādhi as discussed in the Na Karaneeya Sutta.
8. After I heard the “true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta”, I made progress very quickly. When I
look back now, it is quite possible that I may have attained the Sotāpanna stage while listening to that
very first desanā; however, it took me some time to realize it and to convince myself. One needs to
look back at the progress one has made, and see that one is now incapable of committing immoral
deeds that would make one eligible for rebirth in the apāyas.
§ I was so overjoyed with being able to comprehend the “foundation of Buddha Dhamma”, i.e,
the fact that it does not make sense to struggle to achieve happiness which is guaranteed to be a
failure in the long run. I would call or e-mail my friends and tell them that they simply needed
to listen to desanās by those Theros.
§ It took me a little while to realize that most of them could not figure out what I was excited
about. Now I realize that their minds were not ready. For me, who had been struggling
seriously for a few years, it was a revelation, but most people who just spent a bit of their time
reading, it did not “connect”. Reading Dhamma should not be done the same way that one reads
a newspaper; one needs to be engaged.
§ Anyway, after getting the true meaning of “anicca, dukkha, anatta”, I spent the next few
months scouring internet for the desanās of those two Theros; after five months I made a trip to
Sri Lanka and brought back more material to listen to. It was so fulfilling and exciting; I was
learning at a very rapid pace. At that time I didn’t even think about jhānas, but I could feel
“jhānic effects”, i.e, my samādhi was getting intense, even though I was not trying to cultivate
them.
9. Even though I had an inkling about reaching the Sotāpanna stage soon after listening to that
desanā, I developed the jhānas some months later. However, those turned out not to be Ariya
jhānas though, since they can be attained only by an Anāgāmi; see, “11. Magga Phala and Ariya
Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ These and other aspects of Ariya and anariya jhāna are discussed in the section: “Samādhi,
Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
§ Once I finished investigating and “filling the gaps”, the jhānas came almost automatically. The
meditation experience that I described in #7 became much stronger; I could just close my eyes
and “feel the change in the head and the body” within minutes (and nowadays within seconds).
10. The above is what I mean when I say, “feel the results of meditation”. One can feel it in the
body as well as in the mind. Let us first discuss the reasons for the “body effect” and then the “mind
effect”.
§ We have a very complex nervous system which the brain uses to control various body parts and
also to communicate with the five physical senses. There is a “duplicate nervous system”
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1051
associated with the manomaya kāya and as we grow up those two systems get somewhat
displaced. The displacement becomes bigger when we start enhancing all types of bad habits;
they go “out of sync”.
§ When we start learning Dhamma and stay away from most egregious acts, the two nervous
systems try to get to the ideal overlap positions and one could feel that. This becomes
noticeable during meditation. Some people may feel aches and pains, sweating, etc. This is why
I had said in other posts that things MAY look worse before getting better. In a way, such
“body signals” are a good sign; it means the body is starting to respond.
11. Now to the “mind effect”. Many people tell me that they cannot keep the mind focused on even
the breath for too long. That is a sansāric habit that we have; the mind does not like to stay in one
place. It wants to “know” about everything that is happening not only in the vicinity, but it also
randomly thinks about past events or future plans too.
§ The only way to remove this “bad habit” is to slowly get into the habit of thinking about
Dhamma concepts. And this cannot be forced either. Unless and until the mind sees the benefits
of learning Dhamma, it can be a “chore” to some people. But once one gets some traction, one
starts enjoying the “taste of Dhamma”, and then it is easy to stay focused.
§ The key here is that when one learns Dhamma, “ditthasava” (or craving for wrong worldviews)
start to dissolve, initially slowly, but picks up speed as one starts grasping concepts.
§ The two key components of pancanivarana (kamachanda and vyāpāda) are reduced as
ditthasava is reduced. That in turn lead to the reduction of the other three components of the
pancanivarana as well. This process goes all the way to the Sotāpanna stage.
12. Of course I did not realize until after meeting my teacher Thero (online) that what I had been
doing all along was a crude version of the Saptha Bojjanga bhāvanā, the key part of which is
dhamma vicaya (contemplating on Dhamma concepts).
§ That is how one cultivates the “anicca saññā” and that is the key: see, “What is the only
Akusala Removed by a Sotāpanna?” and “How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā“.
§ The formal Saptha Bojjanga bhāvanā is discussed in the next post, “11. Magga Phala and Ariya
Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“.
§ It is also important to realize that even an Arahant will not lose the sense of taste; one
increasingly will lose CRAVINGS for them; see, “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga,
Kāmaccandha“.
13. November 11, 2016: I get many questions on this topic, i.e., how to verify one is making
progress towards the Sotāpanna stage. The new section, “Living Dhamma“, provides a systematic
way to achieve that goal, in addition to providing guidelines on how to check one’s progress.
The top 10 posts in this section describe the fundamentals of Buddhist meditation. The rest of
the posts in this section are on possible meditation subjects and can be used to clarify
unresolved questions, and to gain samādhi. The first 11 posts should be followed in that order,
at least initially.
Revised August 5, 2017; September 19, 2018 (added #10 and updated links to more recent
posts).
1. There are many ways to get to magga phala and Ariya jhānas. What I have followed is Bojjanga
bhāvanā and metta bhāvanā. As explained in the previous post, I first did a crude version of the
Bojjanga bhāvanā for a few years without even realizing that it was effectively a Bojjanga bhāvanā.
§ Now I practice bojjanga bhāvanā/Ariya metta bhāvanā in sitting meditation and Ānāpānasati
(and Satipaṭṭhāna) during other times, i.e., suppressing any thoughts/speech/actions that should
be discarded and cultivating the opposite. Nowadays, It has become a habit and the moment
something not appropriate comes to the mind, I become aware of it. As I keep saying,
cultivating good habits (gathi) is key to progress.
§ Ānāpānasati (and Satipaṭṭhāna) helps one to get rid of bad habits/cultivate good habits, and
thus change one’s gathi and āsavas; see, “9. Key to Ānāpānasati – How to Change Habits and
Character (Gati),” and “Is Ānāpānasati Breath Meditation?“.
§ Bojjanga bhāvanā helps the mind to get to samādhi (and attain jhānas with time) while also
cultivating the Bojjanga dhamma. Saptha Bojjanga (Seven Factors of Enlightenment) are listed
in the “37 Factors of Enlightenment”; a brief description is given below.
§ The other part of my sitting meditation is Ariya metta bhāvanā; see, “5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā
(Loving Kindness Meditation)“. This routine works well for me.
§ Of course, there are many paths to Nibbāna (and to the Sotāpanna stage), and this is the one I
took (almost inadvertently). Still, it is critical to realize that attaining the Sotāpanna stage
ONLY REQUIRES removing wrong world views or diṭṭhi, i.e., getting rid of diṭṭhāsava.
But this may not be an easy step, because one needs to realize the anicca nature of this world.
2. The key here is that during the Bojjanga bhāvanā, one only does “āna” or “taking in good things”;
see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“. However, “pāna” or “removing the bad” happens automatically via
wisdom gained, i.e., via enhanced vision or sammā diṭṭhi. One’s mind is automatically focused on
thinking about a Dhamma concept, and once one gets some traction, the mind will get “latched on to
it”.
§ In the early days, when I started contemplating on a Dhamma concept I automatically got to
samādhi (not jhāna), i.e., the mind became concentrated on that and the body and the mind both
became lighter. I also experimented with with breath meditation at that time.
§ This habit of contemplating on dhamma concepts naturally got established as cultivating
dhamma vicaya in Saptha Bojjanga bhāvanā once I met my teacher Thero.
3. I was able to make real progress only after learning the true meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta;
see, “10. Attaining the Sotāpanna Stage via Removing Ditthasava.”
§ Waharaka Thero has explained how to systematically cultivate the seven Bojjanga dhamma: it
involves first establishing sati (moral mindfulness) based on those correct interpretations of
anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta,” and the follow-up posts.
4. The seven Bojjanga Dhamma are sati (mindfulness), dhamma vicaya (investigation of dhamma
concepts; pronounced “dhamma vichaya”), viriya (effort), pīti (joy), passaddhi (tranquility), samādhi
(one-pointedness), and upekkha (equanimity). I will have a post on this later, but I have discussed
most of these terms in other posts.
§ It is important to again clarify what sati is. Many people think sati is “concentration” or just
“paying attention”. It is much more than that. It is “paying attention” WITH a frame of mind
based on some understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta: One has contemplated on the “big
picture” of the Buddha with 31 realms and a rebirth process that has led to much suffering in
the long run.
§ Even though one may be enjoying life right now, one knows that it will be of negligible
duration compared to the sansāric (or samsāric) time scale. This is the theme of this website,
and there are many posts that one can read.
5. During the whole time of the Bojjanga bhāvanā, sati must be there; that frame of mind must be
there. Dhamma vicaya is a critical evaluation of a given dhamma concept. One can choose a topic or
two for a given session and then contemplate on it. One could do this not only in a formal way, but
also just while reading a web post or a book on the subject. Each individual is different, so one
needs to figure out which is more suitable.
§ One can compare the concept with one’s own life experience, and also others’ that one can see.
For example, when contemplating on anicca, there are several video clips on various posts
giving visuals on the inability of anyone to maintain anything, including one’s own body, to
one’s satisfaction in the long run. Also, one can contemplate on the rebirth process and see
whether it makes sense, one can contemplate on different applications of paṭicca samuppāda,
etc.
§ When one comprehends a given concept, that leads to the cultivation of the pīti (pronounced
“peethi” or “preethi” in Sinhala) sabbojjanga. This is part of nirāmisa sukha that I have talked
about; one starts feeling a happiness or a “lightness” making the mind serene. I am sure at least
some of you have experienced this while reading posts. This gives one confidence that one is
on the right path, and thus one will be motivated to make more effort, i.e., it cultivates the
viriya sabbojjanga.
6. Thus dhamma vicaya, pīti, and viriya sabbojjanga are cultivated together (of course sati must be
there too). At some point though, the mind and especially the body (head) may get tired. If one is
making a lot of progress, one may start to experience some pressures in the head or body; not
headaches, but just pressure. Some feel like “ants crawling in the head”; the brain and the body
(including the nervous system) are adjusting and there is nothing bad about this.
§ When this happens one is making progress; the body feeling the effective meditation. Not only
our minds but our bodies have been contaminated too, and the nervous systems have been
distorted with respect to that in the manomaya kāya. Some of the “pressures” that one feels are
due to the “twisting back” of the nervous system to the proper place. These effects may be
minimal for some people; this is what I experienced.
§And this burning of defilements lead to generation of contaminants that need to be expelled and
cleansed, via proper breathing (this is not “ānāpāna”). We should not focus on the breath like
in the mundane “breath meditation”. We are just getting rid of certain “utuja rūpa” that had
been in the body due to defilements of greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ At this point one should stop the contemplation process and start breathing in and out to cleanse
the body; sometimes the body itself automatically gets rid of those things via a long out breath.
This will lead to passaddhi (tranquility) of both the body and the mind, and one gets to samādhi
gradually. One needs to think about the lightness of the body and the mind (passaddhi) and the
nirāmisa sukha (from samādhi) that results. One also should think about upekkha (equanimity)
too.
§ When the body and the mind calm down enough and when one feels relaxed, one should go
back to cultivating the previous three sabbojjanga, i.e., start on the contemplation process of
dhamma vicaya.
7. Thus one should go back and forth between the two routines with three sabbojjanga each. The sati
sabbojjanga must be there all the time. This is called the two-step cultivation of Bojjanga dhamma.
§ The Buddha compared to this process to the washing of dirty cloth by hand. One needs to apply
soap and wring the cloth to release the contaminants. But then one needs to soak it in clean
water and remove the dirt that came out. After that, if the cloth is still dirty, one applies soap
again, and then again wash it. This process needs to be repeated until all the dirt is gone and the
cloth becomes clean. And one needs to do it with mindfulness: if there is a stubborn stain left in
one place, one may need to use a different chemical to get rid of that spot (i.e., use the
appropriate bhāvanā: asubha bhāvanā to get rid of sense cravings, metta bhāvanā to get rid of
hateful thoughts, dhamma concepts to get rid of micchā diṭṭhi, etc) and wash in clean water
again. Thus one needs to be mindful (sati) during the whole process.
§ In the same way, one goes back and forth between the two routines with sati. Time taken to get
to magga phala depends on the individual. Ariya jhānas can be attained only after getting to the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ Also, this bojjanga bhāvanā cannot be done in isolation. One needs to do ānāpāna at all times
to get rid of bad habits and to cultivate good habits; cultivating this process itself is a good
habit too. Once one gains some traction and sees some benefits, one will become motivated.
8. Initially one should focus on anicca, dukkha, anatta as the dhamma vicaya subject. Then once
some understanding is gained, one’s mind attains certain overall cleanliness. After that, like using
different kinds of chemicals to get rid of coffee stains or a tar stain, one needs to choose different
types of topics (or even meditation techniques) to broaden the understanding/to remove a certain
obstacle. Buddha Dhamma is all about cleansing the mind via wisdom, via understanding the true
nature of this world.
§ Also, it really helps to do the metta bhāvanā as a part of daily routine. The Buddha stated that If
done properly (i.e., with understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta), the metta bhāvanā can lead
to the Anāgāmī stage; see, “5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving Kindness Meditation)“.
§ If one has too many cravings, one could use the “asubha anussati”; if one tends to
procrastinate, one could cultivate the “marananussati”. We will talk about these in the future.
§ But first, it is important to focus on anicca, dukkha, anatta. At the same time, it may be a good
idea to get some idea of the “big picture”, i.e., the rebirth process, the 31 realms, etc and then
some idea about kamma, saṅkhāra, paṭicca samuppāda, etc. All these are pieces of a puzzle;
even though it may look daunting at the beginning when the big pieces are in place, one starts
to get a better idea as for where small pieces may fit in. Anicca, dukkha, anatta are the biggest
pieces.
§ Thus contemplating on anicca, dukkha, anatta is a key topic for dhamma vicaya. I still do it
every day, at least for a short time. It is said that one really understands anicca nature of
this world only at the Arahant stage.
9. The Sotāpanna stage (magga/phala) is attained in two consecutive citta, and it is not noticeable at
that time. One realizes that with time, mainly by realizing that one’s outlook on life has changed. In
particular, the tendency to socialize is likely to be reduced, but there may be exceptions; one realizes
how important it is to spend the remaining little time in this life on making spiritual progress and to
enhance the “cooling down”.
§ In trying to attain the first Ariya jhāna, one could start with the Saptha Bojjanga bhāvanā with
the frame of mind of the unfruitfulness of anything in this world in the long run (anicca,
dukkha, anatta); then all mundane thought objects (based on greed and hate) are suspended
from the mind. Then one can think about the peacefulness of Nibbāna (the partial effect one
experiences upon attaining the Sotāpanna stage), i.e., the change in one’s state of mind.
§ I use the phrase, “etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭi-
nissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānan’ti”. (WebLink: suttacentral: Mahāmālukya
Sutta (MN 64)) I emphasize that I have not yet attained the first Ariya jhāna yet, as of August
5, 2017. It is not possible to attain the first Ariya jhāna until one completely removes kāma
rāga, as I have realized recently; see, “Dasa Samyojana – Bonds in Rebirth Process“. Whatever
jhāna that I had must be anariya jhāna.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1055
§ Here is a recording of the Pāli verse by the Venerable Thero (you need to set volume control at
your computer):
WebLink: Listen to verse on Ethan santhang ethan panithang
§ One could say in English, “It is peaceful, it is serene, the expelling of all saṅkhāra, breaking of
bonds, removing greed and hate; Nibbāna”, OR “This is peaceful, this is excellent, that is
achieved by calming down saṅkhāra, breaking all bonds leading to rebirth, ceasing of all
attachments, stopping of the samsāric journey, cessation of all causes, which is Nibbāna”.
§ by quenching of taṇhā, by overcoming rāga, and eliminating all causes, which is Nibbāna”.
§ What matters in not the actual words, but the understanding one has in one’s mind. It is best to
recite the Pāli verse and recall the meaning while chanting.
10. It is important to realize that one could attain anariya jhāna while working towards the
Sotāpanna stage (or even higher stages of Nibbāna) by contemplating on the true version of anicca,
dukkha, anatta.
§ Jhāna are mental states corresponding to rupavacara brahma realms, which are realms in this
world. They can be attained by either SUPPRESSING or REMOVING kāma rāga, which
correspond to anariya and Ariya jhāna. Either way, one will get to the SAME jhānic state.
§ Since even to get to the first Ariya jhāna by REMOVING kāma rāga, one would have to be an
Anāgāmi to attain the first Ariya jhāna. That is easy to verify for oneself, since one would
lose the craving for any sense pleasures, including sex.
§These and other aspects of Ariya and anariya jhāna are discussed in the section: “Samādhi,
Jhāna (Dhyāna), Magga Phala“.
§ It is also important to realize that even an Arahant will not lose the sense of taste; one
increasingly will lose CRAVINGS for them; see, “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga,
Kāmaccandha“.
11. November 11, 2016: I get many questions on this topic, i.e., how to verify one is making
progress towards the Sotāpanna stage. The new section, “Living Dhamma“, provides a systematic
way to achieve that goal, in addition to providing guidelines on how to check one’s progress.
1. First, one needs to understand what is meant by the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna. Many people
start meditating without any idea of the goal: It is fine to do breath meditation, if one is only needing
to calm down. There are others who are doing procedures that are needed to attain the Arahant stage,
and those will not work either because one needs to understand the concept of anicca first, i.e.,
learning the key concepts comes first (dassanena pahatabba).
§ If one’s goal is to attain the Sotāpanna stage, then one should first read the posts in the
“Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna” section to get an idea of what is meant by a Sotāpanna and what
is involved to get there.
§ There are many misconceptions about the Sotāpanna stage, and those posts could clarify them.
I spent a lot of time doing unnecessary things, so I just wanted to make it easier for those who
are just starting or who have been doing the wrong things to get there. Of course one should
decide for oneself whether what I say is consistent with Buddha Dhamma.
2. I must also point out that there are many who have been “brainwashed” to think that the Sotāpanna
stage is an impossibility to achieve at this time. It is disheartening to see even some “mahā Theros” in
Sri Lanka have given up striving for even the Sotāpanna stage (presumably because they had used the
wrong concepts for many years and could not make any progress). But the Buddha clearly stated that
his Buddha Sāsana will be there for 5000 years, and we are only halfway through. There will be
numerous Arahants also in the near future.
§ There are many who have attained the Sotāpanna stage and beyond within the past few years,
and that number is growing. Pure Buddha Dhamma that had been hidden, is out and is
beginning to spread. Many who have reaped the benefits are trying their best to get the message
out. Most of those efforts are taking place in Sri Lanka or in Sinhala language at this early
stage.
§ Even though it may not be possible for some (those with dvihetuka births) to attain the
Sotāpanna stage in this lifetime, an all out effort will help at least in the future lives. Those who
can make it (with tihetuka births) simply have done more in past lives. By the way, if you come
across any unknown Pāli words, just enter that word in the Search box and there will be
relevant posts listed.
§ In any case, any efforts will have tangible outcomes in this life itself.
§ The Buddha clearly stated that there were no language, race, cultural, caste barriers in attaining
magga phala, or the four stages of Nibbāna. The critical thing is that one needs to follow the
original, pure, Dhamma of the Buddha, and comprehend his message.
§ The key message of the Buddha is that nothing in this material world (31 realms) can be
maintained to our satisfaction in the long run (anicca nature), and thus through uncountable
rebirths we mainly encounter suffering. Some of us may not be experiencing suffering in this
life right now, but that does not mean it will be the same in future lives (or even at old age in
this life).
3. Secondly, having a road map is NECESSARY to get to an unknown destination. Starting to
meditate without having an idea of what to meditate on like just getting in the car and start driving
without having a map showing where the destination is.
§ Here again, the posts in the “Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna” section will be useful.
§ The “map” to reveal Nibbāna is the comprehension of the key concepts like anicca. When one
reaches the Sotāpanna stage, it is like finding the correct map. Then only one can start driving
(i.e., use kammattana or “meditation recitals”) to reach the final destination. Reciting things
without understanding is fruitless.
§Please contemplate on this aspect; I cannot emphasize it enough. Finding the map is the hardest
and most important part.
§ I have started a new section where a step-by-step process is described to follow; see, “Living
Dhamma“. It can also help one figure out where one in the Path, and to clarify many
fundamental issues.
4. Third point — related to the second point — is that we need to examine what is meant by
“bhāvanā” (meditation) when striving for the Sotāpanna stage. It is NOT a formal meditation
technique (reciting a given kammattana) that is mainly needed here.
§ However, the Buddha said that even listening to a discourse is bhāvanā. One could attain the
Sotāpanna stage just by listening to a discourse. When listening attentively, one’s mind gets
focused on it, comes to samādhi, and can get to magga phala via upacara samādhi.
§ What it is needed to get to the Sotāpanna stage is contemplation on the key Dhamma concepts,
in particular anicca, dukkha, anatta, but also to try to get an understanding of the Buddha’s
world view, with 31 realms of existence, beginningless rebirth process, infinite number of
planetary systems (chakkawata), paṭicca samuppāda, etc. This is the way to “find the correct
map” mentioned in #3 above.
§ As explained in those posts in the “Sotāpanna Stage of Nibbāna” section, this meditation
(bhāvanā) involves mainly the contemplation (citta) and examination of dhamma concepts
(dhamma vicaya and vimansa). In fact, the four bases of mental power (chanda, citta, viriya,
vimansa) are very helpful to be cultivated; see, “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara
Iddhipada)“.
§ In the above, “chanda” is the liking to attain Nibbāna and that is cultivated by learning and
forming a desire to learn more Dhamma. I can assure that there is no other pleasure like the
“pleasure of knowing the truth, the pleasure of discovering true Dhamma”. From the comments
I receive, I know that many of you have found that to be true.
§ Formal meditation techniques are needed mainly after the Sotāpanna stage, as described in the
sub-section Key Points from the Sabbasava Sutta under the post, “The Sotāpanna Stage“.
However, it is good to do a few kammattana while striving for the Sotāpanna stage and I will
discuss those in the next post.
5. Fourth is to have a clear idea of the priority items to get done regarding sīla (moral behavior). In
one of the early posts on mediation I made the point that one needs to sort out the “big problems” to
take care of, before tackling smaller problems. If a vessel is leaking due to multiple holes, one needs
to seal the big leaks first. It is a waste of time to spend the precious time in trying plug smaller holes,
when the water is pouring out through the big holes.
§ In the following I will address the fact that many people have misconceptions about the relative
weights of kamma. Please bear with me and read carefully, because some of these ideas go
against some established and common wrong views. I have discussed some in, “How to
Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma“.
6. For example, many people are afraid of even accidentally killing a mosquito, but do not have any
problem making plans to hurt another human or spread rumors about another.
§ Then there are other who think taking an occasional alcoholic beverage is immoral, but spend
hours thinking about other sense pleasures. By the way, it is not the sense pleasures that is the
problem, it is constantly thinking about them; this is a subtle but important point; see, “Assāda,
Ādīnava, Nissarana – Introduction“.
§ Of course, killing any living being should be avoided, and it is best to avoid drinking alcohol
(especially if one tends to get drunk; the problem with drinking is, it makes the mind more
exposed to the panca nivarana; one’s ability to think clearly is diminished when drunk).
§ My point is that hurting another human will have much more potent kamma vipāka compared to
killing many mosquitos or taking an occasional drink.
7. We can get some ideas on these issues by looking at the vinaya rules for the bhikkhus. These are
the rules of conduct for the bhikkhus. There are 227 rules for fully ordained monks (bhikkhus) and
311 for nuns (bhikkhunis).
§ These rules are called patimokkha (“pati” is getting bonded and “mokkha” or “moksha” in
Sanskrit is “Nibbāna“), because they help staying out of trouble and stay on the path to
Nibbāna for the bhikkhus. Remember that in the Satipaṭṭhāna sutta, “mukha” in “mukha
nimitta” also means Nibbāna.
These rules are categorized according to their importance (or the severity of consequences for
breaking them). The top four belong to the class called “parajika” meaning a bhikkhu who breaks any
one of the four has been “defeated” and thus needs to leave the monastic order.
1. Sexual intercourse: any voluntary sexual interaction between a bhikkhu and a living being,
except for mouth-to-mouth kissing which falls under the sanghadisesa (next level below the
parajika level).
2. Stealing: the robbery of anything worth more than 1/24 troy ounce of gold (as determined by
local law).
3. Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is still an embryo —
whether by killing the person, arranging for an assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to
die, or describing the advantages of death.
4. Deliberately lying to another person that one has attained a superior state, such as
claiming to be an arahant when one knows one is not, or claiming to have attained one of the
jhānas when one knows one has not.
8. The next level is the sanghadisesa. The thirteen sanghadisesa rules requiring an initial and
subsequent meeting of the saṅgha (communal meetings). If the monk breaks any rule here he has to
undergo a period of probation or discipline after which, if he shows himself to be repentant, he may
be reinstated by a saṅgha of not less than twenty monks.
§ Like the parajikas, the sanghadisesas can only come about through the monk’s own intention
and cannot be accidentally invoked. However, if the bhikkhu does not go through this absolve
him/herself, then the consequences will be even more harsh. These thirteen rules are not
relevant to our discussion here, but you can read them at: WebLink: WIKI: Patimokkha
§ There two more layers called aniyata and Nissaggiya pacittiya that pertain to bhikkhus and are
again not relevant to our discussion. They are even less potent and can be overcome by just
confessing to another bhikkhu and making a determination not to repeat.
9. The last set of rules are the “weakest”, i.e., with the least consequences compared to all others.
They are the 92 “pacittiya” rules, which are minor violations and can be overcome by just confessing
to another bhikkhu and making a determination not to repeat. The ones relevant to our discussion are:
§ 10. Should any bhikkhu dig soil or have it dug, it is to be confessed (to avoid killing small
animals/insects).
§ 51. The drinking of alcohol or fermented liquor is to be confessed.
10. Many people think “life is a life”, but that is not so. Here digging soil is not allowed for bhikkhus
because many lifeforms (insects, worms) are killed in that process. But this act is listed under the
very last section of the vinaya rules (with least consequences).
§ We know that killing an Arahant or one’s parents is an “anantariya kamma“, a very potent
kamma that will send one to the apāyas in the very next birth.
§ And as we saw in #7 above, killing or giving advice to kill even a fetus is a kamma that makes a
bhikkhu lose his/her ordination. Killing of small insects (inadvertently) by digging soil is a
much less potent kamma, as listed in #9 above.
§ Human life is precious because only a human can strive and attain magga phala, AND it is very
difficult to get a “human bhava“. But even among humans, there is great variation: an Arahant
or one’s parents are ranked way higher. The importance of parents is related to the fact that it is
extremely hard for a gandhabba to find a suitable womb. I will discuss this in detail later.
§ We also see that drinking alcohol is also a minor offense even for a bhikkhu, as it is listed in #9
above. Bhikkhus do not drink alcohol anyway, but this rule came about because of a particular
incident at the time of Buddha.
11. It can be also deduced that stealing is a misdeed with harsh consequences, since it is included as a
“parajika” for the bhikkhus.
§ We need to realize that stealing has many subtle forms too, in addition to “taking something
that belongs to another without permission”. In a society, not doing one’s own part is also a
form of stealing, for example. One is benefitting from others’ work, without contributing to it.
§ We also become indebted automatically to our parents, teachers, friends, etc. Even though they
may not expect a “payback”, it is our duty to “respond in kind” whenever an opportunity arises.
§ More can be found in the post, “Kamma, Debt, and Meditation“.
12. Finally, I would like to point out that it is difficult to quantify the weight of a given kamma in a
generic way. For example, “killing an animal” is a very generic statement and such an act has a very
broad range of kamma vipāka.
§ When you slap a mosquito that bit you while reading a book almost without realizing it, has
very little kammic power associated with it. On the other hand, when one aims a gun at a deer
and fires to kill, that will have much more kammic power.
§ One way to easily figure out the difference between those two acts is to think in terms of
“javana power” of a citta. This goes together with the “intention” and also “how bad one wants
to get it done”. You can almost visualize the difference in the mindsets of killing a mosquito
verses deer in the above example. For more details, see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of
Mental Power“, and “What is Intention in Kamma?“.
§ Hitting a person to cause minor pain is done with less javana in the citta. But hitting a person
with an iron rod intending to kill has much more javana power, as you can imagine.
13. These are things one needs to contemplate on in order to truly understand the Buddha Dhamma;
that is the real vipassana or insight meditation. Getting to the Sotāpanna stage requires learning about
such basic things on one’s own, by thinking about real life.
§ Buddha Dhamma is not a “set rules and rituals” to be blindly followed. That is exactly the
reason that many people have not been able to make any progress and have even given up.
§ When one starts thinking critically and attentively one develops the satara iddhipada that we
discussed in #4 above. Once one gets traction by understanding a few basic things, Dhamma
will be the guiding force to generate chanda (desire) to investigate more and to find more. It is
boring and fruitless to blindly follow precepts and rituals that will not get one anywhere.
14. November 11, 2016: I get many questions on this topic, i.e., how to verify one is making
progress towards the Sotāpanna stage. The new section, “Living Dhamma“, provides a systematic
way to achieve that goal, in addition to providing guidelines on how to check one’s progress.
December 5, 2015
1. There are two ways to look at the effectiveness of recitations. First, one could gain some benefit
when LISTENING TO recitations (such as recorded chanting of sutta), even without understanding
what is said in the suttas. However, that benefit will increase if one understood the content.
§ The effectiveness of recitations in MEDITATION SESSIONS is somewhat similar. There are
many people who have been practicing various types of recitations (kammattana) for 10, 20, 30,
or more years without significant results (i.e., magga phala), even though they are likely to feel
some calming effect.
§ Reciting phrases (in any language) can be quite beneficial if the meanings of those phrases are
understood in either of the above cases. Recitation in Pāli can be a bit more effective, since Pāli
words tend to condense a lot of meaning. If one starts off with at least some understanding,
recitation on a regular basis will help understand the concept at a deeper level.
§ For example, the concept of anicca is understood gradually — with a glimpse of it grasped on
the way to the Sotāpanna stage, getting a firm foothold at the Sotāpanna stage, strengthening at
the Sakadāgāmī and Anāgāmī stages — and is fully comprehended at the Arahant stage.
§ A systematic procedure to get to sammā samādhi to be able to comprehend anicaa, dukkha,
anatta, is described in the “Living Dhamma“ section. It can also help one figure out where one
in the Path, and to clarify many fundamental issues. It is not possible to comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa until one’s mind is purified to some extent. Then one’s mind can easily grasp
concepts rather than just memorizing them.
2. A mundane example is learning the multiplication table. Some get it easier than others. But with
practice anyone can master it. All one needs is to spend some time reciting and memorizing the table,
even though only memorization may not be helpful in the final objective, i.e., solving a bit more
complex problems.
§ We know that this “learning process” can be speeded up by using what one learned in solving
some problems. Rather than just memorizing the multiplication table, if one applied it to solve
some multiplication problems, the learning time can be drastically reduced and also it is easier
to keep in the memory for longer time.
§ This is what the Buddha meant by “bhavanaya bahuleekathaya…..”. Bhāvanā (or meditation)
is what one uses frequently: one needs to be thinking about it and examine it in many different
situations as much as possible. Then the concept starts to “sink in”. Formal recitations can be
part of this process. [bahulīkata:[pp. of bahulīkaroti] took up seriously; increased.(adj.),
practised frequently.]
§ Reciting a phrase repeatedly while contemplating on it (kammattana) is an excellent way to
retain and comprehend a given a concept, once the concept is at least vaguely understood.
3. Another important benefit of a good recitation session is in subsiding the five hindrances
(pancanivarana) that makes the mind agitated and not receptive; see, “Key to Calming the Mind –
The Five Hindrances“. When one is focusing on Dhamma — even by just reciting verses– those
greedy, hateful, and irrelevant thoughts are at least temporarily subsided and the mind will not be
lethargic or agitated.
§ In this respect, just listening to Pāli suttas could be beneficial too. In many Buddhist countries,
many people start off the day with chanting of suttas (pirith) in the background. When I was
little, I used to wake up to the chanting of pirith on the radio (my mother used to do turn it on
the first thing in the morning).
§ If the suttas are recited the right way, just listening to them can make the mind calm. I have
posted audio files of several suttas by my teacher Thero including a 75 minute session in the
post: “Sutta Chanting (with Pāli Text)“.
4. Yet another critical benefit is to make the conditions conducive to attract previous “good kamma“,
and make the mind “tune into” receiving such merits. Each of us has done innumerable good and bad
kamma in our previous lives, and they are waiting for “right conditions” to bring their results
(vipāka).
§ For example, there may be a good TV (or radio) program being broadcast. But if the television
(or the radio) is not “tuned in” to the right station, one would not be able to watch (or listen to)
the program.
§ “Making the conditions right” can bring about both good and bad kamma vipāka too. If one
associates with bad friends, that is making conditions for bad kamma vipāka to bring fruits. On
the other hand associating with good friends and listening/reading Dhamma can make one’s life
better. This is discussed in detail in the posts, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya” and
“Transfer of Merits (Pattidana) – How Does it Happen?“.
§ I have mentioned in many posts that the effectiveness of absorbing material at this website can
be much improved by reading them at a quiet time. In the same way, a meditation session can
be made more effective by calming the mind by doing some well-planned recitations. That
itself can be a meditation session. What I do is, in the middle of recitations contemplate about
relevant Dhamma concepts or my own daily experiences, i.e., do insight meditation in the
middle of the recitation itself.
5. One should tailor the recitation session to match one’s own personality and needs. For example, if
one has a temper, one should spend more time doing metta bhāvanā; if one has excessive greed (for
sense pleasures) one could spend more time doing asubha bhāvanā (unfruitful nature of things),
which is basically to contemplate on the fact that ANY object that is providing sense pleasure is
going to decay and destruct at the end.
6. I have thought a lot about how to present a “kammattana program”. But it is difficult to decide
what kammattana to discuss because each individual is different, and has own preferences and needs.
I may still do that in pieces in the future, and I have discussed basic features of some in other posts.
§ Here, I think it is better to just provide an audio of recitation session that I go through each day.
This is just to give an example of how it can be done, and I know that it helps me in calming
my mind and making it more receptive and alert.
§ This is somewhat modified compared to what I actually do, because I do some parts in Sinhala
which most of you will not understand, and I have also tailored this for those who are seeking
the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
7. It is best to do these recitations in a quiet room, sitting comfortably — but not too comfortably —
so that one would not fall asleep initially. Once one gets used to it, one will never fall asleep. Also, it
may be better to actually say the words initially to avoid the mind to wander around; one could just
recite in the mind later on.
October 13, 2016: I have removed the audio file temporarily until I make a better one. After I started
the “Living Dhamma” section, I realized a way to present material in a better way.
1. I am assuming that anyone who is interested in these kammattana (i.e., those who have the desire
to strive for the Sotāpanna stage) have already read the relevant key posts at Sotāpanna Stage of
Nibbāna. Now, let us discuss different sections of the WebLink: PDF File: Kammattana Example.
§ Also, the Search button on the top right is very useful for finding relevant posts for any given
keyword or a phrase that is not clear.
2. In reciting precepts, instead of the “Pānātipātā Veramani Sikkāhāpadam Samādiyāmi”, which says
“I promise not take another life of a living being”, it is more truthful to say, “I promise not to take
another life with any liking for it” (Pānātipātā pativirato hoti), unless one is dedicating a day to
strictly observe the precepts.
§ For example, if one needs to apply a medication to a wound, that will kill many microscopic
living beings; yet, one has to do that in order to heal the wound; thus in day-to-day life, we
may have to take actions like that we would not like to; this is what is meant by “pativirato
hoti”, i.e., one would not do it unless necessary. But if one is observing precepts, one could
avoid applying the medication on that day.
§ Same for the other four precepts.
3. Note the break in between “itipi so bhagava…”. Many people recite it as “itipiso bhagava…”,
which has a very different and inappropriate meaning.
§ I really need to discuss the meanings of these three phrases, and hope to get it done in the
“Buddhist Chanting” section in the future.
4. The phrase, “Natti me sanaran annan Buddho me saranan varan” means, “I have no other refuge
than that of the Buddha”.
§ “etena sacca vajjena sotti me hotu sabbada” means something to the effect of “may the truth in
my refuge in Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha lead to my well being and success in my efforts”.
§ “etena sacca vajjena sotti te hotu sabbada” means something to the effect of “may this truth
lead to the well being and success in others’ efforts”.
5. The next phrase (in Sinhala, I am unable to come up with a suitable English or Pāli phrase) means,
“I will be truthful to myself, see things as they are, be pure in mind, and endeavor to generate only
pure thoughts (prabhasvara or pabasara citta). I plan to write separate posts discussing some of these
kammattana. Even a single phrase is so condensed that one could write many posts on each.
§ For example, “avanka” comes from “vanka” or “bent” or “not straightforward”. If someone is
not truthful, then that is “vanka“; “avanka” is the opposite of “vanka“.
6. The next three phrases are also very important. I recite it every day. The phrase, “Kayena vaca
cittena pamadena maya katan, accayam khama me Bhante bhuripanna Tathagata”, means: “If I have
done any wrong inadvertently (or due to ignorance) by thoughts, speech, or mind to the Buddha, may
I be forgiven for that”.
§ And then the same phrase directed to Dhamma and Saṅgha. For example, I always worry about
inadvertently explaining some concept in a way which may not be quite right. Also, when
dealing with people, we don’t know whether we inadvertently hurt their feelings or do
something that they see as inappropriate (and it is possible that such a person may be a Noble
person).
7. The next set of phrases are for cultivating anicca saññā and related other factors. The phrase,
“Aniccanupassi viharati, nicca saññā pajahati” means “I will live my life cultivating the anicca
saññā and reject that things in this world can be kept to my satisfaction (i.e., reject the nicca saññā)”.
Similar meaning can be deduced for the following three phrases.
§ In the phrase, “Nibbidanupassi viharati, abhinandana pajahati”, nibbida means “stay away
from valuing sense pleasures” and viharati means “live accordingly”. Abhinandana means
“valuing sense pleasures”, and pajahati means “avoid”.
§ “Nirodhanupassi viharati, samudayan pajahati”, means stop the wheeling process and reject
generating more “san” (“san” + “udaya” combines to give “samudaya“); see, “What is ‘San’?“.
§ “Patinissagganupassi viharati, sambhavan pajahati” means “I will endeavor to break all bonds
to this world, and stop making new bhava“.
§ The last three recitals in this section with “Anissitoca viharati, na ca kinci loke upadiyati”
confirm one’s conviction that “it is unfruitful to stay in this world of 31 realms, there is nothing
in this world that worth craving for (upādāna)”.
8. The set of three phrases that come next also help cultivate anicca saññā, and one could review or
do insight meditation on anicca, dukkha, anatta right after that.
9. The next section is on metta bhāvanā. I normally recite this in Sinhala, but these English phrases
give almost the same meaning. This is also discussed in the post, “5. Ariya Metta Bhāvanā (Loving
Kindness Meditation)“.
§ The relevance to different types of akusala citta is discussed in the post, “Akusala Citta – How
a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“. The 12 types of akusala citta are discussed in, “Akusala
Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“.
10. The next phrase is the standard phrase to use when cultivating jhāna: see, “11. Magga Phala and
Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga“. Even though it is supposed to be fully effective
only after attaining the Sotāpanna stage, it can be used by anyone who has been exposed to the true
meanings of anicca, dukkha, anatta, and is pursuing the Sotāpanna stage.
§ One could get into at least some kind of samādhi by this time, and do some insight meditation
here. Actually, at any of the above kammattana sections, one could do insight meditation
related to that section. I normally do this and my sessions sometimes last for much longer
times.
11. In the subsequent sections, we start giving merits to all living beings. The phrase, “ldam me nati
nan hotu Sukhita hontu natayo”, means “May all my relatives (which does include all living beings
in the through saṃsāra) attain peace and happiness due to these merits”.
§ The next phrase, “ldam vo nati nan hotu Sukhita hontu natayo”, can have multiple meanings. If
one is doing a group session, it could mean “relatives of others in the group”. If one is by
oneself, it could mean “distant relatives”, who may even be in worlds far away from the Earth.
§ Thus when one recites both phrases, it does include all living beings.
12. The next section gives merits to devas (which include brahmas as well), bhūta, and preta, and
then to all beings (sabbe satta). It is another way of giving merits as in #11.
§ Then the next phrase in English is straightforward. I specifically included this so that anyone
can use this with full understanding. If one had (even inadvertently) done a bad deed to
someone that day, one could be thinking about that person and ask for forgiveness. This is a
very effective way to calm the mind and reduce tensions, and I hope to write a post on this. If
done sincerely, one should be able to see the effects in real life. You may notice that the
tensions with that person automatically reduced.
§ What happens is that those strong javana citta that you generate can produce cittaja rūpa that
can affect that person even over long distances. It is again related to what we discussed in #4 of
the main section (above the current “Notes” section).
13. Then we end the session with the phrase “Idam me puññan āsavakkhaya vahan hotu, sabba
dukkha nirujjati” that is recited three times. It means, “May the merits that I have acquired help
remove my āsava (cravings), and lead to the end of all suffering”.
§ It is to be noted here that “asavakkhaya vahan hotu” is really, “asavakkhaya aham hotu” or
“may (these merits) be hetu for cleansing of my asava“. It just rhymes as, “asavakkhaya vahan
hotu”.
14. Of course the above is an example of what one could do. One could use all the kammattana (and
add more), or use only the ones that one likes. I don’t use them all in a given session, but do use some
of them all the time. I just start the session with the first few and select phrases as I proceed.
Sometimes, I get into insight meditation (contemplating relevant ideas, connecting with other
concepts, etc) following a given phrase and just do that for the whole session.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1064 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
15. November 11, 2016: I get many questions on this topic, i.e., how to verify one is making
progress towards the Sotāpanna stage. The new section, “Living Dhamma“, provides a systematic
way to achieve that goal, in addition to providing guidelines on how to check one’s progress.
1. Anussati and anupassanā are two Pāli words that have related but different meanings. It helps to
understand the difference, because many people today incorrectly use various types of anussati
themselves as kammatthāna (meditation subjects).
§ If one understands Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna, these are basically another way of saying the
same thing. They are all different angles of looking at the goal (Nibbāna) and how to get there,
i.e., how to cultivate the Path.
§ It is ALWAYS good to keep in mind that Nibbāna is attained via getting rid of greed, hate,
ignorance (lobha, dosa, moha) from one’s mind. The only other thing to remember is that,
without comprehending Tilakkhaṇa that process cannot be completed. Everything else is just
more details to how to get there.
§ “Anu” can have two different meanings. One is “according to” or “via this process”. The other
is “food” for bad viññāṇa, which are essentially “keles” or “klesha” or “defilements” (or kilesa
in Pāli). But here it is the first meaning that is mainly relevant.
[kilesa :‘defilements’, are mind-defiling, unwholesome qualities. Vis. M. XXII, 49, 65: There
are 10 defilements, thus called because they are themselves defiled, and because they defile
the mental factors associated with them. They are: (1) greed (lobha), (2) hate (dosa), (3)
delusion (moha), (4) conceit (māna), (5) speculative views (diṭṭhi), (6) skeptical doubt
(vicikicchā ), (7) mental torpor (thīna), (8) restlessness (uddhacca); (9) shamelessness
(ahirika ), (10) lack of moral dread (fearlessness) or unconscientiousness (anottappa). For 1-
3, s. mūla; 4, s. māna; 5, s. diṭṭhi; 6-8, s. nīvaraṇa; 9 and 10, s. ahirika - anottappa. ]
[upakkilesa : ‘impurities’, corruptions, imperfections (a frequent rendering by ‘defilements’ is
better reserved for kilesa, q. v. ). A list of 16 moral ‘impurities of the mind’ (cittassa
upakkilesa) is mentioned and explained in M. 7 & 8 (WHEEI. 61/62): 1. covetousness and
unrighteous greed (abhijjhā-visamalobha), 2. ill will (byāpāda), 3. anger (kodha), 4. hostility
(upanāha), 5. denigration (makkha), 6. domineering (palāsa), 7. envy (issā), 8. stinginess
(macchariya), 9. hypocrisy (māyā), 10. fraud (sāṭheyya), 11. obstinacy (thambha), 12.
presumption (sārambha), 13. conceit (māna), 14. arrogance (atimāna), 15. vanity (mada),
16. negligence (pamāda). ]
§ Now we can see the origins of those two words (pada nirukti).
2. First let us first discuss anussati, which comes from “anu” + “sati“. Of course, sati is mindset
(with the Tilakkhaṇa in the background); therefore, anussati means the mindset that is focused on
attaining Nibbāna.
§ There are several types of anussati, but four are lumped together as “caturarakkha” or “Four
Protections” that one should try to keep with oneself all the time that will help one to stay out
of trouble.
§ This is expressed in the following verse (I have not found the source in the Tipiṭaka):
“Buddhānussati metta ca, asubham maranānussati; iti ima caturarakkha, Bhikkhu bhaveyya silava“
6. Now let us discuss anupassanā. In contrast to anusssati, anupassanā is more relevant to formal
meditation.
§ “Passa” means to “get rid of”, as we mentioned while interpreting “assa passa“, in discussing
anapāna bhāvana.; see #3 of “7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
§ Therefore, anupassanā means getting rid of defilements according to whatever the prefix that is
used in front.
§ While there are four types of anupassanā and three are associated directly with Tilakkhaṇa:
aniccānupassanā, dukkhānupassanā, anattānupassanā, and the fourth is asubhānupassanā.
[See; WebLink: suttacentral: Paṭisambhidāmagga Paññāvagga 3.9. Vipassanākathā for
aniccānupassanā, dukkhānupassanā, anattānupassanā and WebLink: suttacentral: Itivuttaka 85
Asubhānupassīsutta for asubhānupassanā]
§ Normal humans take this world to be of nicca, sukha, atta, and subha nature. The key to
Nibbāna is to realize the true nature: anicca, dukkha, anatta, and asubha.
7. Thus, aniccānupassanā means, getting rid of defilements by contemplating on anicca nature.
§ Similalrly, dukkhānupassanā and anattānupassanā mean getting rid of defilements by
contemplating on dukkha and anatta nature.
§ We have not discussed asubhānupassanā up to this point. This becomes more important for a
Sotāpanna to get to the Sakādāgāmi/Anāgāmi stages by contemplating on the bad consequences
of sense pleasures that appear so enticing.
8. Therefore, for one who is trying to get to the Sotāpanna stage, the first three anupassanā are more
important. However, asubhānupassanā cannot hurt (and even could be beneficial) because that helps
calm the mind.
§ We need to remember that the tāpa (or burning or “excitedness of the mind”) comes from
kāmaccanda and vyāpāda: greed and hate. Both arise due excess greed or “blindness due to
excess desire for sense pleasures”; see, “The Cooling Down Process (Nibbāna) – How Root
Causes are Removed” and “Kāma Guna, Kāma, Kāma Rāga, Kāmaccandha”.
§ For anyone interested in meditation, such basics need to be understood: “Living Dhamma –
Fundamentals“. I can see from the discussion forum that many people worry too much about
“deep concepts” WITHOUT having a proper understanding of fundamentals.
9. We also need to keep in mind that one cannot just start doing formal meditations on these
anupassanā. It is a step-by-step process. Obviously, one needs to have some understanding of
Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta): “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“.
§ Even before that, one needs to get rid of the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi by cultivating the
mundane eightfold path: “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
The reason for that was discussed in the recent post, “Buddha Dhamma for an Inquiring Mind – Part
I“. If one has either of the following two views, then it is NOT possible to comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa:
§ The next life is going to be forever, in the heaven or hell.
§ This life is all one has. When one dies, it is over. No rebirth or hell or heaven.
10. There are many reasons why those two views will block the Path to Nibbāna. Following are a few
key reasons:
§ Neither of the above views can accommodate the laws of kamma: That one’s actions WILL
have consequences, and those consequences are much more complex than just leading to hell or
heaven (and then getting stuck there forever).
§ It is not possible to have a consistent picture (world view) without getting rid of wrong views
like there is no rebirth process, or that gandhabba concept is wrong; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi,
Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ If one has above views, then one cannot comprehend the dukkha nature. The fact that most
future suffering is in the apāyās, and that one needs to stay away from dasa akusala done with
powerful and immoral javana citta that “power-up” such births in the apāyās.
Conclusions
11. I know that I keep repeating some things. But I can see that many people seem to skipping
essentials because of their desire to get there quickly. I admire their enthusiasm, but do not want
people to have false hopes. On the other hand, “just learning concepts” is not enough either, so one
MUST put all this to practice, i.e., stay away from dasa akusala (and keep in mind that micchā diṭṭhi
is the worst of them; see the post mentioned in #10 above).
§ The bottom line is, if one can truly see the anicca nature, one will have the anicca saññā and
will avoid dasa akusala with a high degree of fear of the apāyās: “dukkham bhayattena“.
§ Thus one will automatically have Buddhānussati, the desire to reach Nibbāna.
§ Furthermore, it will sink into the mind that those enticing things in the world are in fact of
asubha nature (asubhānussati). One will also realize that all living beings are in the same boat,
and thus will have mettānussati.
12. Finally, one will also have maranānussati established in one’s mind: that one needs to make haste
and cultivate the path before death comes, the timing of which is totally unknown.
§ If one reads the WebLink: dhammatalks.net: Maranasati Sutta (AN 6.19), it is clear that the
Buddha advised bhikkhus to be keenly aware that death can come at any time and thus to
CULTIVATE THE PATH without delay, and that maranānussati was not a specific
kammatthāna.
§ A fairly good English translation of the sutta is at: “WebLink: suttacentral: Mindfulness of
Death“.
Discussion of this post at, “WebLink: Anussati and Anupassanā – Being Mindful and Removing
Defilements“.
1. Once I attended a meditation retreat. Everyone was sitting down on the floor with crossed legs, but
after a while many people “could not endure the pain” and were stretching their legs out or were
fidgeting. It was obvious (to me) that many people could not think about anything else but their pain
due to the uncomfortable posture. This went on for two days. Other than those who were long-time
meditators and were comfortable with the lotus position, I do not believe the others enjoyed the
retreat that much.
§ Such nonsensical “rituals” are part of the set of wrong views (this particular one is included in
“silabbata paramasa”), that one needs to remove before attaining the Sotāpanna stage.
§ It is helpful to think about the goal of meditation. The ultimate goal is to remove greed, hate,
and ignorance from our minds and to attain Nibbāna. But even for those who are just interested
in achieving some “cooling down” from everyday stresses, it is the same fundamental idea that
is at work: We need to keep greedy, hateful, and ignorant thoughts from arising in our minds;
the more we do that the more relaxed our minds will become.
§ Purification of the mind is the way to achieve temporary relief to the mind as well as to attain
the Arahantship. There is no one else monitoring one’s progress; it is one’s own mind that is
keeping tabs on the progress.
§ When one does a “formal meditation”, one should sit in a comfortable position (it could be the
lotus position for those who have practised it), because one could be in that position for several
hours when one gets really good at it and starts enjoying the session. For most people, it is just
sitting in a chair; one that is not too comfortable that one may fall asleep!
2. Getting rid of bad thoughts can be and should be done ALL THE TIME. The Buddha said,
“bhāvanāya bahuleekathāya”, or “meditate as much as possible, whenever possible”. And he said it
can be done in all possible postures: sitting, standing, walking, and lying down.
§ Ven. Ānanda is the only known person to attain the Arahanthood while not in any of those four
postures. He was making an all-out effort to become an Arahant before the first Dhamma
Sangayana (Buddhist Council); only Arahants were able to attend and since he was only one
who had memorized the whole of the sutta pitaka, it was critical that he attained Arahantship
before that. The night before the Sangayana, he had been exhausted by the effort, but he was
still thinking about a dhamma concept while getting into the bed. He sat down on the bed and
raised his legs, to lie down; but before his head touched the pillow, that particular point came
clear to him and the “Arahant phala citta” was realized.
§ Another story from the Tipiṭaka that is also relevant to #1 above is about a minister of King of
Kosala, named Santati. He attained the Arahanthood while listening to a single verse by the
Buddha: “WebLink: tipitaka.net: Dhammapada Verse 142“.
3. I have seen many meditation programs that describe Nibbāna as removing perception or saññā
from the mind.
§ Many people wrongly advise that one needs to remove ALL THOUGHTS from one’s mind to
attain Nibbāna. One time a Deva came to the Buddha and said the same thing: “Isn’t Nibbāna
attained via removing all thoughts?”. The Buddha said, “No. Nibbāna is attained via removing
greedy, hateful, and ignorant thoughts”. It is in the Manonivarana Sutta. I will discuss this sutta
in the future.
§ Some others say that when a thought comes to the mind about a loved one, a place, or anything
material, just to say “that does not really exist”. Just because the Buddha said everything
changes at a rapid pace, he did not mean phenomena did not exist. Phenomena do not exist in a
concrete sense either, because they are constantly changing. This is the same argument that we
discussed in the “Concept of a Lifestream”: the Buddha rejected both “self” and “no-self”. All
phenomena are based on paṭicca samuppāda; they arise due to causes and are not there when
the causes are absent.
§ If one develops any type of samatha meditation (breath, kasina, rising of stomach, etc), AND
attains an Anariya jhāna at or above the fifth, then one may be born in the realm of asanna
brahmas with no mind for very long times, only to come back to human plane and start the
rebirth process all over.
§ All the above meditation techniques are dangerous. As one develops them one may become
forgetful; saññā or perception is a critical mental factor associated with recognition of external
objects. If one starts losing memory, that will be a sign that one is on the wrong path.
4. An Arahant has not removed the capacity to generate thoughts OR perceptions. An Arahant has
removed greed, hate, and ignorance from the thoughts that arise. Thoughts arise in him/her with
saññā, i.e., he/she can identify people or things. They can experience the whole world just as any
other human: they can see, hear, taste, smell, touch, or think about any place. The only difference is
that they will not generate any greedy, hateful, or ignorant thoughts about anything that is
experienced. The concept of Nibbāna is very simple: “ragakkhayo Nibbanan, dosakkhayo Nibbanan,
mohakkhayo Nibbanan”. (Extinction of greed (or desire), hatred (or aversion, anger), ignorance (or
delusion) gives rise to Nibbāna.)
5. And one CAN experience the “cooling down” as one makes progress on removing greed, hate, and
ignorance, even before the Sotāpanna stage. Instead of becoming forgetful, one’s mind will actually
become more sharp and alert. One will be able to remember things BETTER, not less. One will
become happier, not gloomy or depressed. It is hard for normal people to fathom how much stress
is associated with a mind that is burdened with greed, hate, and ignorance.
§The “baseline” state of a normal human mind is heavily burdened. That is why people seek
sense pleasure, basically to get some relief. But the problem is that such relief is temporary
AND many people do immoral things to achieve such pleasures. So it can make things much
worse: not only that one does not get permanent relief, but one will have to pay for the bad
kamma that were accumulated by such immoral acts (lying, stealing, sexual misconduct, etc).
§ This is why one can feel the relief right away when one starts living a “clean, simple life”. That
should be the “base” for starting meditation. It is not possible to make any progress, no matter
how much time one allocated to “meditation”, if one is engaged in immoral behavior; one needs
to start reducing the BIG EIGHT.
§ What the Buddha prescribed was simple, yet profound. As one clears the mind of the five
hindrances (pancanivarana) via living a clean life AND start doing the proper Ānāpānasati
bhāvanā, the progress will accelerate with time, because one’s mind start being able to see
more clearly. One will be able easily grasp the real meaning of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
6. Another series of “desanā” that I listened to described how an advanced meditator can actually
“see” the ”formation/breakup” of the material world; that person says that one could see the
“impermanence” that is described in the “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma” post. He described
how he got so afraid when the “world disappeared” momentarily before re-formation!
§ A citta never arises as a single unit; it arises in a citta vīthi (series of cittas) which normally
have 17 citta if the citta vīthi arise due to an external sense input coming through one of the
five physical sense inputs (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and body). And that there are many billions
of thought moments per second. However, only a Buddha can actually “see” such a fast time
scale.
§ However, only a Buddha can actually “see” such a fast time scale. The Buddha described to
Ven. Sariputta such minute details in summary form, and it took Ven. Sariputta and his
immediate followers hundreds of years to finalize a detailed description of mental/physical
phenomena based on such information provided by the Buddha. This Abhidhamma was not
finalized until the third Dhamma Sangayana; that is when the Abhidhamma pitaka of the
Tipiṭaka became complete.
§ Even in many text books on Abhidhamma, sometimes it is said that “.. rūpa is very short lived
– it endures only for 17 conscious moments. What is formed is almost instantly gone”.
This is wrong! That is the lifetime of a “hadaya rūpa“. A hadaya rūpa is generated in the
hadaya vatthu by a sense event through one of the five physical senses. The lifetime of a
hadaya rūpa is basically the time taken to experience that external sense event, i.e., 17 thought
moments (during which an impression of the external rūpa is made in the mind by a citta vīthi);
see, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?“.
7. The problems with Mahayana teachings can be readily seen, since they have such apparent
contradictions with the advances made in science and technology. However, some of the “fake
teachings” that I mention in this post originated in Theravāda countries, in particular in Sri Lanka.
This is why it is critically important to learn pure Dhamma before or, at least while one is doing
meditation.
§ How can one follow the path of the Buddha without knowing the actual path? “Bhāvanāya
pahāthabbā” or removal of defilements via meditation comes AFTER “dassanena pahāthabbā”
or removal of defilements due to wrong views via understanding the true Dhamma. This is also
why Sammā Diṭṭhi is first and Sammā Samādhi is last in the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ I highly encourage everyone to read as many posts as possible to learn Dhamma. Regardless of
one’s familiarity with Buddha Dhamma, one should read those posts in the “Moral Living and
Fundamentals” section at least once, because they provide the foundation. I know from
experience that if one does not get the basics right, it is harder to comprehend the related
advanced material. Please send me comments if anything does not make sense.
8. In “weeding out” the bad approaches, a key point to understand is that there are many ways to “feel
better”. A drug user can instantly get into a “relaxed state of mind” by taking a drug. We don’t do that
because, (i) we know it is a temporary solution, AND (ii) it has very bad consequences.
§ Getting “addicted to” anariya meditations like breath or kasina meditation is only somewhat
better. There are many who get addicted to them because it does not have any bad
consequences in this life; even though that may be true, it does have bad consequences for the
long term because one is wasting one’s precious time in this human life on something that does
not help in avoiding rebirth in the apāyas.
§ Just because one starts feeling better using a certain technique does not mean it is the THE
solution. This is why one needs to look at the UNDERLYING BASIS of that approach. I have
come across several groups where they are convinced of their “technique” because their
experience got better. But as we just discussed, a “experience” does not rule out a “better
experience” with the correct approach.
§ The only way to make a good judgement of “any theory” or “approach” is to critically
examine it and see whether it can explain the realities that we see around us. Can it explain
why people are born different, why some live relatively better compared to others, why do only
some people get horrible diseases, why do animals experience pain but still cannot do anything
about it (i.e., why they have limited minds)? Only pure Buddha Dhamma can explain all these
and more.
9. Finally, once one looks at the evidence and decides on the Path, meditation can be “formal” or
“informal”. In formal meditation, one allocates a time and place and it could be any of the following:
§ Conventional sitting or walking meditation session. But this is not the only formal way to
meditate.
§ Listening to a Dhamma discourse delivered by an Ariya (one who has grasped anicca, dukkha,
anatta) is an excellent formal meditation session.
§ Reading (and contemplating) on a Dhamma concept, say anicca, is also formal meditation. If it
can be done when the mind is calm, one will grasp more.
10. Informal meditation can be done at any time, anywhere.
§ Merely thinking about a Dhamma concept or trying to clarify a Dhamma concept is meditation.
This can be done while lying in bed trying to fall asleep, waiting at the doctor’s office, riding a
bus or subway, any time one has time that is normally spent day dreaming or generating greedy,
hateful, or useless thoughts.
In all these cases, the five hindrances are suppressed and one can experience a calming effect, which
can be extended to even samādhi if one’s mind becomes focused on the Dhamma concept. One could
develop a habit of doing informal meditations. But avoid doing that while driving or even when
concentrating on a task at work! That WILL have very bad consequences. One needs to use
wisdom (being mindful of consequences) while cultivating wisdom.
Next, “Is Suffering the same as the First Noble Truth on Suffering?“, ………..
1. This is an important post that should be read carefully. Grasping the basic concept here can prevent
many akusala kamma (unmeritorious deed) and also boost the power of a kusala/puñña kamma
(meritorious deed). In addition, it shows the consistency and universality of Buddha Dhamma.
2. The potency of a kamma (good or bad) depends on two key factors. First we need to clarify some
basic ideas.
§ Any action or speech originates as a “thought”. As described in the Abhidhamma section, a
citta is of duration much less than a BILLIONTH of a second. Such fast thoughts do not even
register in our minds. Once in a while a burst of cittas on a given object gets latched on and
stays long enough to register in our minds. Then we consciously think about it and make a
decision.
§ For example, when I walked to the kitchen to make a tea this afternoon, it started as what
seemed to be a thought of “having a tea”. In reality that “thought” itself was due to billions of
citta going through my mind; the initial “vague idea of having a tea” very quickly got built-up
by numerous follow-up cittas until I had to get up and walk to the kitchen.
3. Most such “initial thoughts” just do not cascade into strong enough thoughts to make us to move
physically or even to speak out. If the “impulse of the thought” (or ‘javana”) is not strong enough, we
just disregard it.
§ If you think about it, you will realize that there are thousands, millions of stray thoughts that
pass our minds each day. When we ride a bus just staring out of the window, we see zillion
things go by and each thing seen is a thought. We do not remember most of it afterwards.
§ On the other hand, some impactful thoughts prompt us to instantaneous action or speech.
Sometimes, we just stay on that stream of thoughts: some people laugh out loud just thinking
about a happy event. Other times, if a thought about a hated person comes to the mind, one’s
face getting dark and muscles get tightened.
§ A mother hearing her child cry out is literally lifted out of her seat instantaneously: But what
happens there is, she hears the cry in a series of “citta vīthi” of “thought streams” coming
through the ear-door. Subsequently millions of “mind-door” citta vīthi run within a fraction of
second identifying that it is a crying sound, and it is coming from her child. Subsequently,
millions more citta vīthi start running trying to analyze what could be the problem, and then
more citta vīthi will prompt her to get out of the seat and move towards the source of that
sound. All this happens within a fraction of second, without her consciously aware of it.
4. Not all thoughts on the same subject have the same kammic power.
§ If some insects get killed while someone is walking on the ground or while cleaning the house,
that will have no kammic consequences; because the intention associated with those actions was
not to kill any living being.
§ As we will see below, several key things contribute to the kammic power: the intention, what
kind of knowledge is behind that intention, and whether one does the act enthusiastically are all
key factors.
5. Now let us take an example to see how these different factors contribute to the strength of a
kamma. Suppose a person who does not know that stealing is a bad thing to do and that it will have
bad consequences, steals something from a shop. Since he does it with wrong vision (micchā diṭṭhi)
he does not have any remorse for it. Thus the kammic strength is very high.
§ But if he does it on the urging or prompting by another, then it will have less strong kammic
consequences, since he did not think about doing it on his own, and thus the “javana” or the
“impulse power” of the citta is less strong.
§ Now, if he comes up with the idea of stealing by himself, AND enjoys doing it, that is the
worst.
6. So, now we can see different levels of kammic strengths associated with the SAME ACT of
stealing:
§ 01 If done with wrong vision, with pleasure, and without prompting will have the highest
strength (of course this will be highest BAD strength).
§ 02 If done with wrong vision, with pleasure, and with prompting will have the next lower
strength.
§ 05 If done with wrong vision, with neutral feeling, and without prompting will have the next
lower strength.
§ 06 If done with wrong vision, with neutral feeling, and with prompting will have the next lower
strength.
§ 01 Somanassasahagataṃ diṭṭhigatasampayuttaṃ asaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 02 Somanassasahagataṃ diṭṭhigatasampayuttaṃ sasaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 05 Upekkhāsahagataṃ diṭṭhigatasampayuttaṃ asaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 06 Upekkhāsahagataṃ diṭṭhigatasampayuttaṃ sasaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
Now in the next four cases, the same act was done by person who did know that it was a bad act
and it will have bad consequences would do it with at least some hesitation, and thus the “javana” or
the “impulse of the thought” would be less, and consequently the kammic power will be less. So, now
we have the last four cases:
§ 03 If done WITHOUT wrong vision, with pleasure, and without prompting will have the next
highest (GOOD) strength.
§ 04 If done WITHOUT wrong vision, with pleasure, and with prompting will have the next
highest strength.
§ 07 If done WITHOUT wrong vision, with neutral feeling, and without prompting will have the
next highest strength.
§ 08 If done WITHOUT wrong vision, with neutral feeling, and with prompting will have the
least strength.
§ 03 Somanassasahagataṃ diṭṭhigatavippayuttaṃ asaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 04 Somanassasahagataṃ diṭṭhigatavippayuttaṃ sasaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 07 Upekkhāsahagataṃ diṭṭhigatavippayuttaṃ asaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
§ 08 Upekkhāsahagataṃ diṭṭhigatavippayuttaṃ sasaṅkhārikam ekaṃ.
7. Thus it is clear that just having an understanding of Dhamma (that it is unfruitful to gain anything
at the expense of other beings) will automatically make the kammic power less potent; but this
“knowledge” is not the “book knowledge”; it is not effective if one has read about it but the mind has
not really grasped it. Wisdom and “book knowledge” are two different things.
§ If you think about it deeply, it should become clear that it is the comprehension of anicca,
dukkha, anatta that leads to true knowledge (paññā) and helps get rid of avijjā (ignorance).
It is understanding the true nature of this world, and that one’s actions are bound to have
consequences.
§ It works in the other way too. Good actions will lead to good results.
8. Thus the same kind of reasoning is true for meritorious acts (kusala/puñña kamma). There are eight
levels depending on whether one does meritorious act with/without knowledge, with joy/with neutral
feeling, and without/with prompting just like in the case of the greed-based akusala citta. Let us take
the case of someone making a donation to build a shelter for homeless people.
§ This kusala kamma (meritorious deed) done with knowledge, with joy, and without prompting
has the highest merit.
§ And THE SAME puñña kamma done WITHOUT knowledge, with neutral feeling, and with
prompting has the LEAST effectiveness.
§ Thus the same deed done without comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa is a puñña kamma. The same
deed done with comprehension of Tilakkhaṇa is a kusala kamma.
§ The intermediate six are just analogous to the ones for the greed-based akusala kamma.
9. Let us examine how these categories play out in the real world for the above mentioned
meritorious act of building a shelter for the homeless:
§ If someone understands the value of giving, does it out of the kindness felt for those homeless
people, does it without wishing for anything in return, will be doing it with knowledge. And
thus it will be done without prompting and with natural joy in the heart realizing that one is
making a difference for many people’s lives. This is the highest merit.
§ If a person did the same deed, but initially it took some prompting from others or even
him/herself, it was not spontaneous and thus will have somewhat less “javana” in the thought
process.
§ Those two scenarios without joy would have even less “javana” in the thought process. Here
one may write a check and may not think much about it afterwards. But in the above two cases,
the person may stay engaged with the act of building the shelter and gains joyful feeling
everytime he/she thinks about it.
§ Now, those four cases can be repeated for a person who does not understand the true impact of
that act. The kammic power will be reduced accordingly. Thus a person who does not have an
understanding of kammic consequences, the true nature of this world (i.e., that we all may go
through such hard times or worse in other lives, etc), just writes a check out of necessity, may
be even with the intention of getting some votes (i.e., prompting by oneself after seeing the
benefits for one’s political career) will have the least benefits.
§ Thus understanding Dhamma (true nature of the world) leads to spontaneous meritorious
actions done with a joyful heart; this leads to saddhā (true faith) , citta pasada (joy), and
adhimokkha (resolve) to get the maximum impact of the impulse kammic power (javana).
Adhimokkha (resolve) is a key factor in the kusala-mūla paṭicca samuppāda, see, “Kusala-Mūla
Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
Notes:
1. There are two akusala kamma rooted in hate and two rooted in ignorance. The way to sort those
are different. I will write another post on them.
2. This above description is a simpler version of a post that I did recently: “Javana of a Citta –
The Root of Mental Power“. It may be a good idea to read that too.
3. The eight types of akusala citta are also discussed in “Akusal Citta and Akusala Vipāka Citta“.
11.21 Pañca Indriya and Pañca Bala – Five Faculties and Five Powers
1. These are included in the 37 factors of Enlightenment; see, “37 Factors of Enlightenment”.
2. “Indriya” means leader; a leader has power or “Bala”. Thus these two sets of five factors each are
very important in following the Noble Eightfold Path.
§ The five mental faculties (indriya) are saddhā (faith), viriya (effort), sati (mindfulness),
samādhi (concentration), and paññā (wisdom), and there are five corresponding powers (Bala).
§ Eye, ear, nose, tongue, and the body are the five physical faculties (indriya). They are leaders in
providing access to seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching. The pañca indriya are the
“mental” leaders helping with comprehending Dhamma.
3. Let us first discuss the five faculties.
§ Saddhā is foremost; without faith (saddhā), one does not have the conviction to follow the
Path. However, faith has to be based on wisdom (paññā), i.e., one’s faith is built upon seeing
the truth of Buddha Dhamma, at least partially.
§ Saddhā comes from “sath” or truth and “dhā” meaning “dhāranaya” or “grasp”. Thus one will
have saddhā when one grasps the true nature of this world (tilakkhana) at least to some extent.
§ Blind faith is actually a hindrance to progress, since one will be following the wrong path.
Furthermore, blind faith will not last long, since it is on a shaky foundation. Saddhā of a
Sotāpanna is unshakeable, and will never be lost or even reduced.
Thus we can see the saddhā and paññā need to progress together.
4. When saddhā and paññā is developed to a certain extent (before the Sotāpanna stage), one realizes
the fruitlessness and the dangers of the sansāric journey. Thus one is motivated to make an effort
(viriya).
Furthermore, one realizes that one needs to be mindful in one’s actions, and thus sati (mindfulness)
starts to build. One realizes that one has to act with yoniso manasikara.
At the same time, one realizes that when the mind is not calm, one can make bad decisions; thus one
starts working on calming the mind and to attain a level of concentration (samādhi). Concentration is
not really a good translation for samādhi; one does not need to force concentration; rather samādhi
comes about when one takes precautions to not to get into “bad situations”; see, “What is Samādhi? –
Three Kinds of Mindfulness”.
5. Different people have the five faculties developed to different degrees (developed in this life AND
also carried from previous lives), and normally one could stand out. The Buddha has shown the
following way to identify the predominance of different faculties in a person.
§ If someone has a relatively more developed saddhā, that person is likely to be peaceful and
helpful to others with a kind heart. He/she will have no trouble in following the first precept of
not harming any other being.
§ Then there are people who can easily bear hardships and are very determined; they have a
developed viriya (effort) indriya. They can easily keep the second precept (not taking what is
not given), and be satisfied with one earns by one’s hard work.
§ Those who do not pursue sense fulfilment aggressively have less kāmachanda and are not
likely to have any problems with the third precept. They are likely to have a developed
mindfulness (sati) faculty.
§ When the samādhi indriya is strong, that person is likely to be quiet and does not like to engage
in idle chatter; thus keeping the fourth precept on right speech will be easy for them.
§ Someone with paññā (wisdom) will be able to comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta easily and
thus to realize the fruitlessness and the dangers of the sansāric journey. Such a person will be
able to keep the hardest fifth precept on controlling the mind; see, “The Five Precepts – What
the Buddha Meant by Them”.
6. Once one identifies the strong faculty, one should try to exploit that to move forward; the other
faculties always pitch in to help, so they will grow too. It is important to cultivate all five faculties
until they become powers (bala), but one needs to exploit the predominant one.
§ If someone tells a child, “this is not your actual Mom; she is somewhere else”, the child will not
only refuse to believe that but will run to the mother and give a hug just to show how confident
he is. In the same way, saddhā based on paññā can only make one’s resolve be strengthened by
obstacles.
§ For example, when one does not have saddhā, one can be influenced to change the course by an
outside influence. But if saddhā, built on paññā, is strong no matter how strong the influence is
one’s faith will not be shaken.
§ The Buddha gave a simile to understand the how indriya can become bala to overcome
difficulties: When a river runs into an obstacle like a large boulder, it splits and goes around it,
and merge together after the obstacle. But the indriya needs to be strong enough to do that.
§ When indriya (faculties) are strengthened, they become bala (powers).
7. When the faculties are being cultivated, it is important to try to balance them, while utilizing the
predominant faculty’s power.
§ Some people have paññā and may say, “it is useless to take precepts or chant “Tisarana” or
chant/listen to suttas; it is better to learn Dhamma”. But those activities do help in getting the
mind to be receptive to Dhamma; see, “Buddhist Chanting“.
§ On the other hand, just reciting those verses is not enough. In order to recite them with
understanding, one needs to learn Dhamma and cultivate paññā.
§ Normally, saddhā and paññā go together and needs to be balanced. Similarly, viriya (effort)
and samādhi (concentration) need to be balanced. For example, when doing formal meditation,
too much of an effort can be a drawback for samādhi. As the Buddha told Sona the musician,
the strings on a violin need to be just right, not too tight and not too loose.
§ Sati (mindfulness) must be leading and must always be there.
§ Sati can be compared to the steering wheel of a car; saddhā and paññā can be compared to one
set wheels, and viriya and samādhi can be compared to the other set of wheels. The wheels
must be in balance and the steering wheel must be kept at correct position all the time for the
car to go forward. If the wheels are not balanced, the car will just go in circles; if the steering
wheel is not managed, the car will go off the road.
8. These five (saddhā, viriya, sati, samādhi, paññā) are cetasika (mental factors). They help define
one’s character (gati) for the better, and these five are important ones to “take in” or “āna” in
ānāpāna sati.
9. The five faculties exercise control in their respective domains: saddhā in the domain of
adhimokkha (decision or resolve), viriya in paggaha (exertion), sati in upatthāna (awareness),
samādhi in avikkhepa (non-distraction), and paññā in dassana (view or vision). When they become
bala (powers) , they become unshakable by their opposites – indecision, laziness, negligence,
agitation, and delusion or ignorance.
§ It is important to realize the value of citta pasāda (joy) and adhimokkha (resolve) that results
from saddhā based on true understanding: adhimokkha is an intermediate step in Kusala-mūla
paṭicca samuppāda on the way to Nibbāna, see, “Kusala-Mūla Paṭicca Samuppāda“.
§ Also, citta pasada and adhimokkha that arise in doing meritorious acts with joy in the heart are
key to optimizing the merits; see, “A Simple Way to Enhance Merits (Kusala) and Avoid
Demerits (Akusala)“, and “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power“.
10. The five indriya become five bala and are well balanced only for an Arahant. We can reap many
benefits even before reaching that ultimate goal by cultivating them, making sure to try to keep them
balanced.
§ Even for an Arahant, there are some leftover “imperfections” even though they are not
defilements; these are some “hard-to-get-rid-of” quirks in personal behavior. For example,
there is this story about a very young Arahant who had the habit of jumping over puddles
instead of going around them; he had been born a monkey for many lives in the recent past and
had carried that habit over to this life.
§ Only a Sammā Sambuddha (like Buddha Gotama) is perfect in every respect. This is why he is
called “tatagatha” (“thatha” for “what should be” or the “real nature”; pronounced
“thathagatha“).
1. As we discuss in the following posts, meditation is of two types: one is done at all times, being
“morally mindful”, and then the other type is the formal meditation where one contemplates on a
given “procedure” while sitting down or walking.
§ In Buddhist meditation, the first is more important than the second.
2. Then there are three possible outcomes of meditation: samādhi, jhāna, and magga phala.
3. One gets to samādhi by focusing the mind on one thing. Normally a mind jumps incessantly from
one thing to another: a sound pulls the mind one way, a sight another way, smell, etc., and the mind
itself likes to jump around. Regardless of the cause, this makes the mind tired, but unless one has
experienced samādhi, or especially jhāna, one may not even realize that one’s mind is constantly
under stress; of course we do realize it when a deadline approaches and the mind goes to overdrive.
One can truly appreciate this only after experiencing the tranquility of a focused mind. The mind gets
“sensitized” as one gets to samādhi.
§ Most people do not realize how “inherently stressed” our minds are. We get used to things, and
do not feel even hardships. Only when we get to a “better state” we feel the difference, and then
it is hard to go back to the “lower state”. For example, one who has lived a life of poverty has
gotten used to it. Even though once in a while one thinks about the “better life” enjoyed by
some others, one does not think about that all the time. However, if one is able to upgrade the
lifestyle to a higher level, then one can FEEL the difference and now it will be very difficult to
go back. One becomes “sensitized”. We will encounter this word “sensitized” in many cases
when we discuss the Satipaṭṭhāna sutta.
§ Most people meditate to get some “peace of mind”, to get some relief from the pressures of
hectic life. That is a form of samādhi. When one focuses on a neutral object, like breath, one
gets to such a “neutral kind of samādhi”.
§ There are three kinds of samādhi when categorized according to morality, i.e., what the focus is
on: micchā samādhi and two types of sammā samādhi, one mundane (for living a better life)
and one supermundane (focusing on Nibbāna).
§ There is a post on different types of samādhi: “What is Samādhi? – Three Kinds of
Mindfulness“.
4. Jhāna is a deeper level of samādhi, where the mind really gets absorbed in the object (arammana).
Then the tranquility is optimized, and there are eight levels of jhānas: the first four are the ones
experienced by beings in the 16 realms of the rūpa loka, and the last four in the 4 realms of the arūpa
loka.
§ Jhānas CANNOT be attained via micchā samādhi.
§ The jhānas attained via sammā samādhi are two types, corresponding to Ariya jhānas and
anariya jhānas; see, “Power of the Human Mind – Anariya or Mundane Jhānas” and “Power of
the Human Mind- Ariya Jhānas“.
§ Even though one can get to anariya jhānas by just focusing on the breath, it does require one to
live a moral life. One who is not at least following the conventional five precepts will not be
able to cultivate them; see,“Jhānic Experience in Detail – Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2)“.
§ Of course the uniqueness of Buddhist meditation is the supermundane sammā samādhi, leading
to Ariya jhānas, and the four stages of Nibbāna.
5. Thus the highest levels of “peace of mind” are at the four stages of Nibbāna or magga phala:
Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī, and Arahant. However, it is not necessary to PRACTICE Ariya
jhānas in order to attain magga phala.
§ For example, one could attain the Sotāpanna stage without practicing jhānās. What is needed to
attain the Sotāpanna stage is upacāra/anuloma samādhi; see, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense
Inputs“.
§ Furthermore, unless one has practiced it before, a Sotāpanna cannot automatically get into a
jhāna. However, it will be easy for a Sotāpanna to attain jhānas with practice.
§ We need to remember that jhānās are mental states of higher lying brahma realms. They still
belong to the 31 realms of “this world”. One needs to lose cravings for jhanic pleasures in order
to attain the Arahanthood.
6. To get to Ariya jhānas, one focuses on Nibbāna (or more precisely recall one’s own “cooling
down”): see, “Power of the Human Mind- Ariya Jhānas“. But before one can use this technique to
attain Ariya jhānas, one needs to attain the Sotāpanna stage; see #7 below. This is a point that I
have clarified only recently.
§ Basically, one sits down in a quiet place, and first contemplates on anicca, dukkha, anatta, for a
little while, and then keep repeating the following (or the English translation; what matters is
one has to have the understanding): “Ethan santhan ethan paneethan, yadidan sabba saṅkhāra
samatho, Sabbhupathi patinissaggo, tanhkkhayo, virago, nirodho, Nibbanan ti”, [‘etaṃ santaṃ
etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo
nirodho nibbānan’ti.] which means, “It is the only peace, the only happiness: prevent saṅkhāra
from arising (via) eliminating taṇhā and excess greed, and thus stopping the arising of
defilements, which is Nibbāna“.
§ The reciting of a certain phrase (meaningfully, with understanding) is called a “kammatthāna“.
A given meditation technique is also called a kammatthāna.
§ Two important points to keep in mind: (1). One can either say it out quietly, or say it in one’s
mind, (2) This is not chanting; just saying the words will be just a waste of time. One needs to
comprehend, to some extent, what is meant by anicca, dukkha, anatta, i.e., some idea of what
Nibbāna (or “cooling down” is).
§ If one has experienced any kind of “cooling down” it is best to recall that while saying the
above phrase. For example, if one does not flare up like one used to, or if one has less
attachment to things, that is the best to recall.
7. Since one cannot focus the mind on Nibbāna without first experiencing it at least at the Sotāpanna
phala moment, one cannot get to Ariya jhānas without first reaching the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Even though the Sotāpanna phala moment comes and goes without one really noticing it like
getting a message of the sort, “OK. You have reached the Sotāpanna stage”, one starts feeling
the “cooling down” afterwards. This is a hard thing to explain and actually it takes a while
before one truly realizes that one has attained it.
§ The bottom line is that one needs to reach the Sotāpanna stage before getting to Ariya jhānas. If
one suspects that one has reached the Sotāpanna stage, one can use the procedure in #6 above
to cultivate the first jhāna.
§ Unlike the Sotāpanna stage, it is relatively easy to confirm the attainment of the jhāna, because
one’s Ariya jhāna cannot be disturbed by even forcefully thinking immoral thoughts. So, if one
can confirm that one has reached even the first Ariya jhāna, that means one is also a Sotāpanna.
8. Thus reaching magga phala and Ariya jhānas REQUIRE the understanding of anicca, dukkha,
anatta, the Three Characteristics of existence. Without the “correct vision” or sammā diṭṭhi at some
level, the mind does not see the unfruitful nature of sense pleasures or the “superiority” of nirāmisa
sukha.
Next, “Are you not getting expected results from meditation? “, ………..
1. Samādhi (“sama” + “adhi” where “sama” means “same” and “adhi” means “dominance”) means
the object becomes the priority. Then the mind gets focused on it. As we discussed in many posts,
when the mind becomes focused on one object (ārammaṇa), the ekaggatā cetasika takes over and
make the mind latched “on to it.”
§ This is how one gets to not only samādhi but also anāriya jhāna using breath meditation, just
by focusing the mind on the breath.
§ One gets to samādhi on whatever the activity one gets absorbed.
§ Being mindful depends on the situation. The kind of mindfulness needed while driving a car is
different from the mindfulness required to design something (or read a book). And the
mindfulness required to attain a jhāna needs to be different from those two.
2. There can be numerous kinds of samādhi. Here we distinguish three types of samādhi or
mindfulness:
§ Momentary mindfulness (khaṇika samādhi)
§ Access mindfulness (upacāra, pronounced “upachāra“, samādhi)
§ Absorption mindfulness (appanā samādhi)
§ In anāriya meditations, this object is usually either a kasina object or the breath or the
falling/rising of the stomach.
6. Now let us look at some general features of the three types.
§ It is possible, for someone with practice, to get into appanā samādhi (jhāna) very quickly. Thus
the difference between the three types of samādhi is not in the time scale. Instead, it is on the
goal or the situation at hand.
§ Workplace or home accidents happen when one loses momentary mindfulness. If one loses
attention on the task at hand, one can pull the wrong switch, cut oneself while chopping
vegetables, or even tripping while walking.
§ One can be reading something for hours and not get anything in, if the mind wanders off. One
can be sitting in meditation for hours and not get into samādhi if the mind wanders off.
7. In all these three types, achieving mindfulness comes naturally if the five hindrances are not
covering the mind; see, “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances“.
§ If one has greedy or hateful thoughts (kāmachanda and vyāpāda), it is challenging to do any of
the three.
§ Even a simple task can become aggravating and frustrating under the following conditions.
One’s mind is lethargic (thina middha), one is agitated by being high-minded or low-minded
(uddhacca kukkucca), or does not have a clear idea of the task (vicikicchā).
8. Thus it helps to live a moral life, i.e., avoid the ten immoral acts as much as possible. And it pays
off to make preparations ahead of the time.
§ Especially for the upacāra and appanā samādhi, one could make sure to get other tasks out of
the way beforehand. Then meditation does not have to be interrupted in the middle. Simple
things like going to the bathroom and making sure one does not have full stomach before sitting
down to meditate, can make a difference.
§ Preliminary procedures such a reciting precepts or offering flowers or incense to the Buddha
before a formal meditation session is also a part of “getting the mind ready”. As we will discuss
later, attaining “citta pasāda” or a “joyful mind” has a valid reason behind it.
9. Samādhi is the endpoint of being mindful (sati).
§ Samādhi is a synonym for the cetasika (mental factor) of ekaggatā, i.e., having a focus. One
can cultivate it by being mindful the correct way, i.e., via sammā sati.
10. Finally, it is also possible to get into micchā samādhi, the opposite of sammā samādhi. A master
thief plotting a grand robbery can get focused and be absorbed in that immoral activity. The same is
true for a serial killer planning a killing.
§ Thus there are three kinds of samādhi when categorized according to morality. One is micchā
samādhi. The other two are sammā samādhi: one mundane (for living a better life) and one
supermundane (focusing on Nibbāna).
11. One could get into upacāra samādhi by reading this post paying attention to the material. One
may need to read related posts or other material to absorb the material. When the minds gets
“absorbed in the issue,” it is in a state of samādhi. Of course, that is possible only if the material is
interesting for oneself.
§ If correctly done, one will have a lower heartbeat, and a calmer and peaceful mind, by the time
the reading session. People have attained even magga phala by attentively listening to Dhamma
discourses.
1. It does make sense to do formal meditation even at the very beginning when one decides to follow
the Path of the Buddha, but AFTER one has at least read about the correct interpretation of “Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta“. In the following I will discuss the importance of a daily (or few days a week)
formal meditation session.
§ When one starts seeing the dangers of staying “in this world” (anicca nature), one needs to
reassure the mind that there is an alternative, i.e., Nibbāna or Niveema. Thus, simultaneously
with contemplating anicca nature, one needs to encourage the mind to taste the nirāmisa sukha
that results from it by cultivating samādhi. A formal meditation session provides that.
§ The Buddha gave a simile to explain this effect. In the old days, when people took to the oceans
to look for new lands, they took caged birds with them. When they were lost and wanted to find
whether they were close to land, they released a bird and shooed it away frightening it. The bird
would fly around looking for safety (i.e., land) but will be forced to come back to the ship if no
land is found; but if it can see land, it will not come back to the ship. When the mind starts
seeing the dangers of amisa sukha or “worldly pleasures”, we need to encourage it to enjoy the
nirāmisa sukha, i.e., that there is a better alternative.
2. Even before one gets to jhānas, one can experience “cooling down” when one engages in regular
formal meditation. Looking back to my early days, I remember getting to some sort of samādhi while
sitting at the desk and contemplating on a Dhamma concept. The body became light and breathing
became slow due to the calmness of the mind.
§ It is hard to feel “samatha” or “samādhi” if one is not sitting down or lying down.
§ Furthermore, it gives one confidence that one is making progress if one can see the
“improvement” in being able to stay in “samādhi” for longer times with practice. To
emphasize, this samādhi does not need be a jhāna. It is just being able to stay in one place with
a focused mind and with palpable lightness in the body and the mind.
3. Many people who do breath meditation say that it is a samatha bhāvanā to calm the mind
BEFORE doing vidassana (insight) meditation. But that is a waste of time. One can get to samatha
by doing vidassana (vipassana) or insight meditation.
§ As I have discussed in other posts, one should find a quiet place and sit comfortably. One could
start the session with Tiratana vandana to calm the mind; see, “Buddhist Chanting“. One could
make the room dark and light a candle and/or incense to “set the background”. Those activities
help some people to get into the proper mindset.
§ Then one could just start contemplating on a Dhamma concept. One could either listen to part
of a desanā or read part of an essay and then start contemplating on that. This is insight
meditation.
§ Some people who do breath meditation have difficulty in maintaining their focus on the breath;
other random thoughts start creeping in. However, if one starts seeing the value of Dhamma and
becomes truly interested in learning Dhamma, it will become easier to concentrate on a
Dhamma concept. Thus one initially should pick a topic of interest to oneself.
4. With time, it becomes easier to get to samādhi by gradually purifying the mind. But it is important
to figure out which areas to focus on in order to gain maximum benefits.
§ First, it is important to realize that there are two main categories of “bad deeds” that can have
negative consequences; see, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā” for details.
§ Those done with lobha (excess greed), dosa (hate), and moha (covered mind) can lead to birth
in the apāyas (four lowest realms). Permanent reduction of lobha, dosa, moha to rāga, paṭigha,
avijjā happens when one attains the Sotāpanna stage.
§ Those done with rāga (craving for sense pleasures), paṭigha (friction), and avijjā (ignorance)
can only lead to rebirth in the higher realms in the kāma loka (human and deva realms), and in
rupi and arupi brahma loka. Thus one can concentrate on those after getting to the Sotāpanna
stage, but one can start thinking about them too in order to help comprehend the anicca nature
as discussed further below.
5. Therefore, our main goal should be to avoid those actions that can lead to rebirth in the apāyas,
i.e., avoid those actions done with lobha, dosa, moha.
§ In simplest terms, this means getting rid of micchā diṭṭhi and comprehending anicca nature.
One of the strongest kind of micchā diṭṭhi prevalent today is materialism: One believes that at
death one ceases to exist, i.e., one believes that the mind is a byproduct of the body (brain), and
thus when the body dies, that is the end of story. This is also called vibhava taṇhā.
§ It is a good idea to review the relevant posts on micchā diṭṭhi to make sure one understands
them. The ten types of micchā diṭṭhi are discussed in “Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths,
and Samādhi“. There are also many posts on “anicca, dukkha, anatta“.
§ Starting on the Eightfold Path for a Sotāpanna Anugami begins with getting rid of micchā
diṭṭhi, comprehending anicca, and thereby comprehending first stage of sammā diṭṭhi; see,
“Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and the post in there.
6. By sorting out priorities (the order of things to be done), we can save a lot of time in getting to the
Sotāpanna stage.
§ One has the potential to be born in the apāyas if one has remnants of gathi suitable for those
four realms; there are many posts on gathi, bhava, and jathi at the site to read and contemplate
on.
§ It is imperative to be mindful and avoid actions compatible with “apāya gathi“. In the
meditation sessions, one could think back to the previous few days and see whether there were
any such instances and make a determination to not to repeat such acts. Once it becomes a
habit, one can even catch oneself doing it and stop right then.
§ For example, if someone does something bad to you, and if you start thinking about “how to get
back” in retaliation, that is done with hate and need to be stopped. However, it is OK if one
“gets mad” momentarily at such an unprovoked, harsh act by someone. It is only at the
Anāgāmī stage that one will automatically stop “getting mad”. Even then there may be some
annoyance at that person. Only an Arahant has perfect upekkha and will not be bothered to the
slightest by ANY provocation.
§ Another example is extreme greed (lobha) where one tends to do “whatever it takes” to get
what one wants, and also wishing that others should not get those things. Enjoying sense
pleasures (kāma rāga) that are acquired through legitimate means is not a hindrance to attain
the Sotāpanna stage. Thus engaging in sex with a spouse is done with kāma rāga, but that with
another’s spouse or a child, for example, is done with lobha.
§ A successful meditation program goes hand in hand with a moral lifestyle. They feed on each
other.
7. It is also very important to be aware of the dasa kusala, dasa akusala, and also puñña kriya; see,
“Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa Kamma“, “Ten Immoral Actions (Dasa Akusala)” and
“Punna Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā“.
§ Punna kriya help one attain the right mindset for meditation. Also, puñña kriya increasingly
become stronger kusala kriya as one’s understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta grows.
§ A Sotāpanna has COMPLETELY removed only micchā diṭṭhi from the dasa akusala. Only an
Arahant is completely free from dasa akusala; see, “What is the only Akusala Removed by a
Sotāpanna?“.
§ Of course, the tendency to do dasa akusala start decreasing from the time one starts on the
mundane eightfold path, even before the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a
Chart“.
§ In terms of Abhidhamma, the apayagami strength of all dasa akusala will be removed at the
Sotāpanna stage due to the removal of the 4 diṭṭhi sampayutta lobha citta and the vicikicchā
sampyutta moha citta; see, “Akusala Citta – How a Sotāpanna Avoids Apayagami Citta“. Thus
if a Sotāpanna commits any of the remaining 9 akusala kamma their strength would be much
reduced, because one has removed gathi suitable to be born in the apāyas, mainly by getting rid
of micchā diṭṭhi.
8. Many people worry about sense pleasures way too early. It is not necessary to forcefully suppress
normal sense desires before the Sotāpanna stage, even though it may happen to some extent
automatically. Kāma rāga (and paṭigha) are removed via the Sakadāgāmī and Anāgāmī stages.
§ If a vessel is leaking due to multiple holes, one needs to fix the bigger holes first. Trying to
plug small holes which are leaking slowly, while water is draining rapidly through gaping big
holes, is a waste of time.
9. On the other hand, contemplating on the bad consequences of sense pleasures can lead to a better
understanding of anicca (unfruitfulness of worldy things) and the First Noble Truth. In addition to the
suffering due to obvious causes such as an ailment or a headache, we are not even aware of most of
the suffering that we endure.
§ In fact, in a twisted way, we perceive most of our sufferings as enjoyments. It is a “made-up”
enjoyment and is called “assāda” (āsvāda in Sinhala).
§ This is also a good “meditation topic”, and could help one to get to samādhi. However, this
should be done when one can come to a stage where one starts to comprehend such concepts.
Each person is different, so one should keep trying different options.
10. For example, we enjoy eating, especially if the food is tasty. But why do we have to eat? This
seems like a foolish question, but there are beings (brahmas) who do not need to eat anything. They
are sustained by their kammic power (previous good kamma). Devas have to consume amurtha to
sustain themselves, but that is a very fine food and there is no residue (i.e., they do not defecate or
even sweat).
§ On the other hand, we have to work hard to make money to buy food, spend time and energy to
cook, and then “enjoy a meal” that lasts may be half an hour.
§ But all that suffering (working to make money, going to grocery store, cooking, etc) is masked
by “made-up mind pleasures” or assāda: We look forward to that meal and forget about all that
suffering!
§ On the way back from work we may start getting hungry, but that will be masked because we
will be thinking only about the meal that is waiting for us.
§ Is this any different from a cow who pulls a heavy cart, but forgets about all that suffering
because it is focusing on a bundle of hay dangling in front of it?
11. Let us consider another type of hidden suffering that is associated with cleaning ourselves. In the
morning, we brush our teeth, take a shower, shave, apply all kinds of fragrances and go to work very
happily. We don’t even notice the hidden suffering associated with all that work!
§ One could experience another facet of that suffering if one can skip a day or two of doing those
things. It will be very uncomfortable even for ourselves let alone for the others.
12. In fact, most of the things that we do in a given day are done to just maintain our bodies, our
houses, our environment in a presentable condition. Yet, we do not see the suffering associated with
all those activities. That is another way to comprehend anicca nature.
§One may think that thinking about such things could make one depressed. That is certainly
possible if one did not know about the anicca nature, and also that by following the 37 Factors
of Enlightenment one can be released from that suffering.
§ The comprehension of the true (anicca) nature of this world, and the hidden sufferings
associated with it gives one “anuloma shanthi“. This is the joy that comes from grasping the
true nature of this world.
§ Then by realizing that there is a way to REMOVE future suffering (by following the 37 Factors
of Enlightenment ), provides one with “sammatta niyama“.
§ Thus as one makes progress, it is a good idea to think about specific cases where one has
gained a “peace of mind”. That itself can lead to samādhi. One needs to realize BOTH the
dangers of the rebirths process (anicca nature) AND the benefits of following the Path
(Niveema or cooling down).
§ When one starts experiencing BOTH anuloma shanthi and sammatta niyama, one becomes a
Sotāpanna Anugami, which inevitably leads to the Sotāpanna stage; see, “Sotāpanna Anugāmi
and a Sotāpanna“.
13. Finally, I want to emphasize the importance of trying to extend the duration of the formal
meditation session gradually.
§ At some point one will start feeling body sensations. And then the mind will “switch over” to a
different state. When that first happened to me a few years ago, I was startled. At that point one
could let the mind “take over”, i.e., stop contemplating and let the samādhi “grow” and
possibly lead to jhānas (it is easier for those who have the sansāric habit; but jhānas are not
necessary for magga phala). Now one has attained a higher level of samādhi. One could of
course continue with insight mediation.
§ This is when one starts feeling enhanced nirāmisa sukha. It is not really a “pleasurable feeling”
in the sense of what you experience in eating a nice meal, listening to a favorite song, etc. It is
rather a calmness of an unburdened mind. Until one experiences it, one is not aware of the real
stress that our minds are normally under. One comes out of the meditation session refreshed
and alert.
§ I would say it is possible that one could start experiencing some kind of benefit when the
session is naturally lengthened to half an hour or may be an hour. I am just basing this on my
own experience. If people are willing to share their experiences, I can update this post in the
future (or even present someone’s experience in a separate post). That could help motivate
others.
Some people try to attain Nibbānic bliss by trying to “give up all attachment to this world” in their
minds during meditation. However, until the mind truly realizes the dangers of this world (the rebirth
process), it is unable to give up those attachments.
§ One has to attain at least the Sotāpanna stage by “seeing the true nature of this world” before
one’s mindset becomes amenable to “giving up”. This is the hardest part to understand.
§ Even before that one needs to get rid the 10 types of micchā diṭṭhi as discussed below.
1. During the time of the Buddha there was a bhikkhu named Potila, who was well-versed with deep
Dhamma concepts and was a well known teacher; he had developed abhiññā powers as well, but had
not attained even the Sotāpanna stage. His desanās (discourses) were deep and only those at the
Anāgāmī stage (at least Sotāpanna stage) could follow them and get to Arahanthood. One day he
went to see the Buddha, paid respects, and told the Buddha that he had been a Dhamma teacher
during the times of several earlier Buddhas too, and helped many to attain Nibbāna (Arahantship).
[Bhikkhu Potila - see, Poṭṭhilatthera Vatthu - Dhammapda verse 282]
§ The Buddha asked him whether he has attained any magga phala and Bhikkhu Potila admitted
that he had not. The Buddha just commented: ”Thucca Potila” and turned his attention to other
matters; thucca (pronounced “thuchcha”) in Pāli means despicable or “lowly”.
2. So, bhikkhu Potila, who had expected praise from the Buddha for helping others, realized that he
needs to work on his own salvation before helping others. He strived by himself and could not make
any progress; he was trying very hard to “give up all attachments”, following the same instructions he
was giving others. But no matter how hard he tried, he could not succeed.
§ When he sought help from other bhikkhus, they were reluctant to become his teacher because
everyone knew he was very knowledgeable in Dhamma. Eventually, he went to this very young
Arahant, who was well-known for his teaching abilities, and sought help. The young Arahant
agreed to help, only if bhikkhu Potila agreed to carry out everything as instructed, and Potila
agreed.
§ The young Arahant decided to use an unusual kammatthana (instructions). He took Potila to a
large area covered by mud, and asked him to wade into the mud and keep going until told to
stop. Potila started wading in mud and kept going until he was told to stop when the mud was
all the way up to his chin; he was barely able to move at this point because mud was heavy.
3. The Arahant told him that, “if someone is stuck in mud like that any knowledge about cleaning
oneself by taking a bath is not going to help. One needs to get out of the mud first”.
§ Then he asked Potila to come back. Potila had great difficulty in moving forward initially, since
he was all the way up to the chin in thick and heavy mud. While dragging himself out of the
mud with great difficulty, Potila realized what the young Arahant was talking about. It is not
possible to get out of mud until one realizes that one is stuck there, and getting out of mud
required sheer will power. Similarly, he had not realized that he was stuck at a much lower
moral level; he needed to cleanse his mind first.
§ The “giving up” part comes with a mind that has removed the wrong visions (micchā diṭṭhi) and
also excessive greed for sensual pleasures. These cannot be removed just by reading or
listening about that.
4. Of course one can remove some of it by reading, listening, and contemplating on the validity of
the reasons that the Buddha has given, especially on micchā diṭṭhi. One has to realize that kamma (or
one’s actions) are likely to have their results either in this life or the next, and thus the rebirth process
must be valid. Remaining types of micchā diṭṭhi are also related to kamma and rebirth. The 10 types
of micchā diṭṭhi are discussed in “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage”.
§ The second level of removal of micchā diṭṭhi comes via comprehending anicca, dukkha,
anatta; ; see, “Micchā Diṭṭhi, Gandhabba, and Sotāpanna Stage”.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1089
5. The simile can be made even better by looking at what happens to ants who get stuck in honey.
Here unlike mud, the sense pleasures are appealing and there is no incentive to get out either. Those
ants who get stuck in honey, would not even try to get out because they are too busy enjoying the
honey. Even when they are barely stuck, and can move out of honey, they would not because
they like the taste of honey. Just like that, any living being, whether a human or even the lowly
worm, likes to indulge in the sense pleasures, and thus gets stuck.
§ And even when one realizes that one needs to get out of “the honey pot” it is hard, at least
initially.
§ For that one needs to see the perils of staying in this rebirth process, where birth in lower four
realms will lead to unimaginable suffering. Even if one can strive to be born in higher realms,
that will not last long. This is “anicca“: no matter how hard we try to find refuge in the 31
realms it is not possible to do so in the long run.
6. With much effort, Potila slowly made his way up to the waist level, and started feeling the
lightness of being free of mud. He could now move faster too. He felt the relief when he was out of
the mud, and was asked to go and take a shower. Now, cleaning up with soap could be done; but
while stuck in mud, there was no use of soap and water. Just like that the deep Dhamma that he had
memorized was of no use to him while he was still stuck in mud.
§ Eventually, when one comes out of the mud that is like the Sotāpanna level. One is still covered
with mud, i.e., one still likes to enjoy sense pleasure. But now one KNOWS that one needs to
take a shower, use soap and shampoo, and remove all that mud.
7. What Potila was doing was to give discourses on deep Dhamma that could help an Anāgāmī attain
the Arahanthood. Most of those who benefited from bhikkhu Potila’s discourses were, ironically,
Anāgāmīs. Potila was just reciting the Dhamma without real comprehension but those who benefited
were capable of comprehending the true meanings. After that kammatthana, Potila was able to attain
the Sotāpanna stage and soon became an Arahant.
(By the way, one cannot attain the Sotāpanna stage by taking instructions from an Anariya, i.e., one
who had not attained at least the Sotāpanna stage. But once one attains the Sotāpanna stage, one can
learn by himself or from anyone else and get to the higher stages. This is why it was only Sotāpannas
or above (mostly Anāgāmīs) who could benefit from bhikkhu Potila’s discourses).
§ I believe this actual incident involving bhikkhu Potila highlights a very important point. No
matter how much one reads on deep concepts of Dhamma, it is hard to get the idea to sink in
unless one’s mind is purified to a certain extent. It is critical first to break through the heavy fog
of being covered by many wrong concepts and strong attachments. When one breaks through
that initial “wall of resistance”, then it is easier to comprehend deeper concepts; see “Lobha,
Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“.
8. One needs to make progress in a systematic way. Just like it is not possible to learn high school
math without learning basic addition/subtraction, one MUST understand the basic concepts first. If
one is engaged in killing, stealing, sexual misbehavior, lying, gossiping, getting “drunk” with alcohol,
drugs, power, beauty, money, etc, it is not possible to calm the mind to a basic level. And this is the
hard part. One is stuck in mud (more like honey, because it feels good to be stuck there).
§ And while stuck in mud (or honey), no matter how much meditation one does, it is not possible
to get LONG TERM relief. One may be able to go to a meditation retreat and be away from all
those “honey-filled” attractions and enjoy some sense of calmness; but that goes away soon
after coming back to “real life” with all those temptations.
§ One needs to slowly work one’s way through the mud (or honey, because that is how it seems
initially first). This is the HARDEST part. No matter how much one READS, that is not going
to make much difference until one sets up the stage for the mind to see the reality.
§ By the way, this is also why those who meditate on “there is no self” (there is no ‘me’) cannot
make any progress either. One needs to comprehend the “pointlessness in striving to
accumulate material things for oneself” first. If one could tell a full blown lie, hurt someone
else, sexually misbehave, etc, then isn’t that done to gain something for “me”?
9. Here is a rough step-by-step I would recommend (this is of course not for everyone; just for
those who know they are stuck in honey):
A. If one is hurting others to get sense pleasure, that should be stopped first. It is double jeopardy;
one is not only “getting stuck” due to excess greed, but also going to suffer consequences of harming
others. One is not only getting attached to “pleasurable things” but also accumulating bad kamma by
hurting others.
§ For example, if one is killing animals for fun (sport), stealing valuables from others, having
sexual relationships with other married people or young children, planning to hurt someone
(even for retaliation), or spreading rumors about someone just to get some pleasure out of it,
getting drunk and verbally/physically abusing others, all those would be included here.
§ Such immoral activities are the worst, and are called “pāpa kamma”. Both lobha and dosa
(dvesha) are involved here and one’s mind is said to totally covered with ignorance
(moha); see, “Lobha, Dosa, Moha versus Raga, Patigha, Avijjā“.
§ Thus someone in this stage is deeply in mud all the way up to the chin.
B. One notch lower is being capable to do things (of course not always) with EXTREME greed, even
if it does not hurt others directly; here one is only up to waist to shoulder level in mud. These are
normally the things one does to seek “perceived happiness” by going to extremes.
§ When one cannot get “high enough” with alcohol one tends to try drugs, because one has been
“de-sensitized”. We all know of many movies stars etc. who get into this trend and end up
committing suicide because nothing at the end can bring more pleasure to a highly “de-
sensitized” mind.
§ Another indication of extreme behavior is living beyond one’s means. This is of course relative.
If one is living a small (but comfortable) house and wants to move in to a bigger house just for
the sake of that by stretching one’s resources, that is a sign of extreme greed. If one is already
living in a mansion that one has inherited or earned, and there is no financial burden, then there
is nothing wrong with that since that will not burden the mind. However, in general, the more
fancier the item is, whether a house or a car or anything else, it normally takes more time and
effort to “maintain”, and inevitably there is a degree of attachment because of the perceived
value.
§ Such extreme greed could also lead to actions of hate, when someone else gets in the way. Then
one may do “pāpa kamma” here as well; it is possible that actions of hate gets one to the higher
level.
It is not possible to discuss all possibilities, but one should be able to figure out many such cases. No
one else can decide these for anyone. Only each person knows about one’s own status of mind.
However, any sensible person can make some kind of a judgement for oneself, but not for others.
C. If one is at stage A or B above, one should read those posts in the “Moral Living and
Fundamentals” section. It could be helpful to go back and read those as one makes progress, and see
that one understands more things than previously. This is hard to explain, but is true. A clear mind
sees things much more easily.
§ For those who are in stage A or B should read posts #1 through #3 below first.
D. Once one gets to the B stage, one should start reading the posts on the “Key Dhamma Concepts”
and in particular learn and comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta.
This is the real key step, to get started on the next stage. Once one gets some traction, there is
nothing there to hold back someone from attaining the Sotāpanna stage. It had been hard for
hundreds of years only because the correct concepts were hidden. Once one gets some traction, one
can start doing any of the bhāvanā.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Bhāvanā (Meditation) 1091
§ As Carl Sagan said, “..think about all those emperors and kings who committed unmentionable
atrocities just to have a sense of superiority and power for maybe 50 years. They are all gone”;
see, “The Pale Blue Dot……..“. Even though Dr. Sagan did not know, that is another way to
state what anicca is.
§ All those emperors and kings will be stuck in the animal or lower realms for billions of years to
come. On the other hand, a peasant who lived within his/her means and led a moral life could
be living in a deva/brahma realm for billions of years.
§ The main point here is that there is no point in trying to seek sense pleasures or accumulate
wealth for 80-100 years maximum, because at the end we will not be able to KEEP
ANYTHING to our satisfaction. We may have a billion dollars, but if our bodies are worn out,
will we be able to get ANY sense pleasures? Will we be able to keep any part of our bodies to
our satisfaction? Many people try to “beat the aging process” by using temporary fixes such as
botox, but any such effect will also will be temporary.
§ It is not possible to really grasp the meaning of anicca, dukkha, anatta, if one is stuck in mud or
honey.
E. When one comes out of the mud and start walking (with mud on the body), that is like the
Sotāpanna stage. Now one does not even need anyone’s help, even though that can help expedite the
process; one can figure things out by oneself.
§ There are many who know many suttas by heart or abhidhamma concepts, but nowhere close to
the Sotāpanna stage.
§ We need to understand that Buddha Dhamma is not about JUST LEARNING concepts (even
though learning plays a big part), it is all about using what is learned for purifying the mind. As
the mind becomes clear, one will start seeing the reality better. In the Buddha’s days, illiterate
people were able learn Dhamma just by listening, and even attained Arahanthood.
E. The final stage is to realize that even birth in such deva/brahma worlds will be temporary. At some
point in the future, they are all going to commit some bad deed and end up in the four lower realms
for long times; that is just the nature of this world, where sense pleasures can lure anyone to commit
bad actions. But there is no point in talking about that stage, until one gets above the A and B stages,
and become a Sotāpanna.
F. The series of posts that I am writing on the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta goes through this process too, from
stage A. Therefore, it may be a good idea to read those posts from the beginning as well. The first
introductory posts are full of Pāli words, but just go through them briefly even if you do not fully
understand. They WILL become clear later, if not now.
§ When one starts following the Path, one is bound to break the trend once in a while. A child
learning to walk will fall many times. Many people get discouraged when they do an immoral
act occasionally; but just to realize that one did a mistake, and that it bothers one’s mind, means
one HAS MADE PROGRESS. That is why one needs to have the perseverance to get back up
with a renewed determination. Just like a child WILL learn to walk, one WILL get better with
time.
G. Of course I do not know the level of each person coming to the website. Only each person knows
where he/she is relative to the above steps.
§ If one truly can purify one’s mind and comprehend anicca, dukkha, anatta, that is all it takes to
attain the Sotāpanna stage.
§ There is material ranging from the basic level to very advanced levels and even more will be
posted in the future. This is for the sake of completeness, and also to make sure that any scholar
or interested person can gauge the depth of Buddha’s true teachings.
§ There are also people who really start comprehending Dhamma and start enjoying finding about
further details; no other type of “pleasure activity” can match the “enjoyment of Dhamma”.
Buddha Dhamma is the ultimate “book of nature”.
§ Furthermore, reading widely on different topics will help build saddhā (faith), which is NOT
blind faith but faith built on understanding. When one sees how little modern science knows in
comparison to the Buddha, it helps build faith. And paññā (wisdom) and saddhā grow
together.
1. Anariya bhāvanā methods (which include breath, stomach rising/falling, or just repeated recitation
of a passage, such as “May all beings be happy and healthy”) can suppress the five hindrances and
can lead to mundane samādhi. But the effects are temporary, as anyone participated in meditation
retreats knows; it feels really good at the retreat, but after coming back and getting into the normal
hectic life, that feeling of calmness fades away with time.
2. The Buddha compared such meditation techniques to riding a mule. His most recommended
method was “vipassana pubbanga samatha”, which he compared to riding a race horse.
§ Vipassana means “sort out and get rid of undesired thoughts that come to the mind”,
pubbangama means precedes, and samatha is calming the mind or attain samādhi.
§ Thus in “vipassana pubbanga samatha” meditation, when one does the vipassana bhāvanā, it
automatically leads to samatha or samādhi and (Ariya) jhānas.
3. In the Ariya bhāvanā or the “vipassana pubbanga samatha”, one’s mind is constantly working to
GET RID OF the defiled thoughts, not merely to suppress them as in the Anariya version. As one
cultivates this Ariya bhāvanā over time, the five hindrances are slowly REMOVED from the mind
and the mind gradually shifts towards a permanently calm state. Thus, it becomes easier and easier to
attain samādhi, since the five hindrances are gradually removed.
§ We talked about a contaminated water well in “The Basics in Meditation” post above. In
Anariya bhāvanā what is done is basically let the dirt to settle to the bottom of the well by not
further stirring the water. The water eventually becomes relatively clear, but in a new session
one needs to do it all over.
§ In contrast, in the Ariya version, one is constantly REMOVING dirt from the well. Therefore,
session after session dirt is removed, and eventually there will be very little dirt to remove and
thus the mind will get to samādhi very quickly.
4. In the beginning, it is better to do formal meditation sessions. As one gains practice, one could do
it while waiting in the doctor’s office or riding a bus.
§ First, sit in a quiet place as described in the “The Basic Formal Ānāpānasati Meditation” post.
Close your eyes and let the mind relax. Thoughts will invariably start popping up. Disregard
any neutral thoughts and immediately get rid of any greedy or hateful thoughts as they start
coming up.
§ It will be helpful to contemplate the negative consequences of such thoughts.
§ For example, if thoughts about an unkindly deed someone did to you comes to the mind, think
about the bad consequences of “doing tit for tat”: that will only enhance and cultivate
defilements in YOUR mind. We do not have control over what others do; but we can control
our minds. The more your mind becomes free of any hateful thoughts, the chances of having to
face such adversary situations will diminish. You may be surprised, but that is true. Just have
perseverance for a few weeks.
§ In another example, if you start thinking a greedy thought, say for a tasty, high calorie snack,
think about the bad consequences (gaining weight, getting addicted to such impulsive thoughts,
etc), and also think about being able to have the confidence of self-control.
5. Do not try to remove all thoughts that come to the mind. This is very dangerous advice that some
meditation teachers give. We need to remove ONLY those thoughts that have greed, hate, or
ignorance associated with them.
§ If any good, meritorious thoughts come to the mind, cultivate them; think further along those
good thoughts. It could be a good deed that you did like helping someone, or an alms giving
that you participated in, etc.
§ If neutral thoughts come to the mind, let them just pass by. Do not cultivate them, but do not try
to suppress them either.
6. It could be hard to do this in the beginning. But if you really want to make progress (chanda), can
have the determination (citta), make the effort (viriya), and actively engage in looking at the bad
consequences of bad thoughts and the possible benefits of good thoughts (vimansa), you WILL make
progress, AND it will get easier with time. These four iddhipada will also be cultivated on the way;
see the post on “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)”.
7. When you actively suppress kamachanda (excess greed) and vyāpāda (hate) by this procedure, the
other three hindrances (thina middha, uddhacca kukkucca, and vicikicchā) will automatically reduce.
Thus all five hindrances will be gradually removed and your mind will become “free of gunk”. See
the post on “Key to Calming the Mind – The Five Hindrances”.
8. As you make progress, your mind will gain a calmness, a relief, that is permanent. It will get easier
and easier to “get to samādhi”. The Buddha compared the relief gained by this bhāvanā as follows:
paying off a big loan that had been a burden to the mind, being released from jail, recovering from a
major disease, gaining freedom from slavery, and reaching safety after crossing a dangerous desert. If
someone has all those five experiences at the same time, the Buddha said, that is the kind of relief one
gets by removing the five hindrances.
§ This is the nirāmisa sukha that one gains, when one approaches Nibbāna or Nivana; see the
post, “How to Taste Nibbāna”. Nibbāna is “cooling down”, it cannot matched by any sense
pleasure, and it is permanent. One can experience it in varying degrees as one cultivates this
Ariya meditation.
XII Abhidhamma
§Abhidhamma – Introduction
o Subsection: Essential Abhidhamma – The Basics
§ State of Mind in the Absence of Citta Vīthi – Bhavaṅga
o Subsection: Mind and Consciousness
§ What is Mind? How do we Experience the Outside World?
§ What is Consciousness?
§ 1. Thoughts (Citta), Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) – Introduction
§ 2. Viññāṇa (Consciousness) can be of Many Different Types and Forms
§ 3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious
o Subsection: Citta and Cetasika
§ Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises
§ What is a Thought?
§ What is in a Thought? Why Gathi are so Important?
§ Cetasika – Connection to Gathi
§ Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power
o Subsection: Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)
§ Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya) – Introduction
§ Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?
§ Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)
§ Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?
§ Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body
§ Brain – Interface between Mind and Body
§ Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)
§ Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description
3. Abhidhamma provides the complete, consistent description of the whole existence (encompassing
the 31 realms). With this description, there can be no unexplained phenomena at any level. A logician
like the late Dr. Kurt Gödel could have a great time with it; see, “Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem.”
§ The scope of Abhidhamma is somewhat comparable to what the scientists are trying to do with
a Grand Unified Theory to describe the behavior of inert matter. Einstein devoted the latter part
of his life to developing one and failed, and the scientists are still far from achieving it. And
even if accomplished, it will be able to describe ONLY the behavior of inert matter, not of
living beings.
4. Abhidhamma is the Grand Unified Theory of the Buddha. I gave an introduction to it in the post,
“The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma.” In this Abhidhamma section, I will try to provide further
details. My goal to is to describe it in an easy-to-grasp simple manner.
§ When I taught physics to undergraduate students, I told them not to memorize anything, but to
grasp the essence of the material. Many students (and adults) try to memorize descriptions of a
concept but have no idea how to apply the concept. I used to give them all the complex
equations and any other hard-to-memorize material in the tests; what they needed to do was to
apply them in solving problems.
§ My approach is the same here. For example, in the “Tables and Summaries” post, different
types of cittas (loosely-speaking “thoughts”) are listed. There is no need to memorize them.
One should understand a given Dhamma concept starting from the basics: for example, which
cittas are immoral and can lead one to rebirth in the apāyās and WHY.
5. For example, a key concept in Buddha Dhamma is saññā (translated to English as “perception”).
But it is much more complicated than “knowing and identifying an object”; see, “Saññā – What It
Really Means.”
§ One of my first goals in the Abhidhamma section is to describe saññā, and the critical role
played by the brain. For that we first need to understand the connection between the brain and
the mind (they are NOT the same).
§ Abhidhamma can make one addicted to it, as I have become addicted to it. When one starts to
grasp how this complex world really works, understanding even a bit more of it can bring joy to
the heart.
6. However, I must say that even if one can understand the whole of the Abhidhamma theory, one
MAY NOT understand the Buddha’s message. One must understands the true meanings of
anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ I had so many unresolved questions on parts of Abhidhamma until I listened to the first desanā
from one of my two teacher Theros almost a year ago, on July 30, 2013, on anicca, dukkha,
anatta. It was like lifting a fog, and by the end of that desanā, I knew I will be able to ‘fill-in-
the-blanks” to make my understanding much better.
§ Abhidhamma can solidify and “fill-in-the-blanks” of Buddha Dhamma from the suttas, which
can be exhilarating.
7. Following is a brief background on how the Abhidhamma Piṭaka of the Tipiṭaka was developed
over roughly 250 years by the lineage of bhikkhus started with Ven. Sariputta. Of course, Ven.
Sariputta was one of the two chief disciples of the Buddha: While Ven. Moggallana excelled in
supernatural powers, Ven. Sariputta excelled in Dhamma. He was only second to the Buddha in
Dhamma knowledge.
§ The minute details on the structure of a citta vīthi (a series of citta) of 17 thought moments,
with each citta lasting sub-billionth of a second, can be seen only by a Buddha. The Buddha
described such minute details to Ven. Sariputta. Then Ven. Sariputta and his group of bhikkhus
(and their subsequent lineage) completed the monumental task of making a complete
description of Dhamma theory starting with the fundamental entities.
§ As I mentioned earlier, that is a million times more complicated task than putting together a
Grand Unified Theory to explain the behavior of inert matter, (as scientists are attempting to do
today). Because a living being has an inert body, but a complex mind which makes that inert
body “alive”.
8. At the First Buddhist Council just three months after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha, only a
framework of the theory was recited. More was added at the second Council, and the task was
completed only at the third Council. It was this completed Tipiṭaka that was written down in 29 BCE
at the Fourth Buddhist Council.
§ A false statement in many books is the following statement. Abhidhamma was “invented” by
bhikkhus after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha. The minute details of the very fast citta vīthi are
discernible only to the mind of a Buddha.
§ Those who make such statements have not either studied Abhidhamma, or have not been able
to understand the in-depth analyses in Abhidhamma. The minute details of the very fast citta
vīthi are discernible only to the mind of a Buddha.
§ It is essential to realize that hundreds of Arahants at the Fourth Council wrote the whole
Tipiṭaka. That included the complete Abhidhamma Piṭaka.
9. The absence of Arahants (in significant numbers) started around the second century CE, and
coincided with the rise of Mahāyāna and the “contamination” of Theravāda which culminated in the
Visuddhimagga of Buddhaghosa; see, “Historical Timeline of Edward Conze.”
§ As we discuss more topics, it will become clear that only Arahants with superior mental power
can accomplish a complex of completing the Abhidhamma Piṭaka. It was compiled in the
absence of an easy way of recording, let alone having access to computers.
§ I have given a breakdown of the Abhidhamma Piṭaka in the post, “Preservation of Dhamma.”
10. August 12, 2015: I have brought the subsections on “Mind and Consciousness” and “Manomaya
Kāya” from “Dhamma Concepts” to the “Abhidhamma” section since it is imperative to understand
those basic concepts first. It is a good idea to read those subsections (and “Citta and Cetasika”) before
reading further in the Abhidhamma section.
§ It is not necessary to understand the material in all those essays. But the more of those basic
concepts one understands, it becomes easier to grasp the content in subsequent articles.
§ Also, we all keep increasing our understanding as we learn Dhamma. I learn new things every
day and try to update the posts as much as possible. The more one learns, the more one can “see
the inconsistencies” in other versions of “Buddhism,” and possibly in my essays; some of these
posts date back to 2014. Please don’t hesitate to point out any inconsistencies on this website. I
would be grateful. There is a “Comments” tab under each post.
11. September 8, 2019: I have written a series of posts in a new subsection to introduce fundamental
concepts in Abhidhamma at “Essential Abhidhamma – The Basics.”
REFERENCES
1. “A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma,” by Bhikkhu Bodhi (2000); this is a revised and
updated version of Ref. 2 below.
2. “A Manual of Abhidhamma,” by Narada Thero (1979).
3. “Buddha Abhidhamma – Ultimate Science,” by Dr. Mehm Tin Mon; this is a very good FREE
publication (click the link to open the e-book).
Unfortunately, some concepts in all three references are not correct. In particular, almost all
existing Theravāda texts (except the Pāli Tipiṭaka of course) have the incorrect interpretations of
anicca, dukkha, anatta. Also, in all three references, kasinas and breath meditation are presented
as Buddhist meditation. I will try to point out such problems in relevant posts.
Next, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises”, ………
August 23, 2018; revised (#18 added) September 12, 2018; January 6, 2019
Introduction
1. Even though only one word in the English language (“thought”) is used to describe “a unit of
cognition” or “a thought,” the Buddha explained that such a “thought” arises as a citta, and goes
through nine stages of “contamination” to become viññāṇakkhandha. What we actually experience is
this viññāṇakkhandha.
§ However, even a contaminated citta is still called a citta for convenience even in the suttās. So,
one needs to determine what is meant depending on the context. One needs to have an idea of
those nine stages.
§ Some of these terms in the nine stages are used interchangeably to as “a thought” in many
textbooks and internet sites on Buddhism (e.g., citta, mano, viññāṇa), and that is NOT correct.
2. I will make this a post simple because everyone must get the basic idea of how a thought is
“contaminated” within a split second.
§ It is not possible to stop the contamination of a citta within such a short time. I have seen even
some well-known and respected Dhamma teachers say that one can willfully keep a
“pabhassara citta” (uncontaminated citta) from being contaminated.
§ I hope this post will make it clear that such a thing is not possible. One’s cittā are
contaminated depending on one’s gati and the sensory input in question. The key to
STOPPING cittā from getting contaminated is to change one’s gati over time.
§ That is done by following the Noble Path, and specifically by practicing the correct Ānāpāna
and Satipaṭṭhāna bhāvanā. That will become clear by the end of the post.
Nine Stages of a Thought (Citta)
3. Those nine stages of contamination during the lifetime of the fundamental unit of cognition (within
a billionth of a second) are: citta, mano, mānasan, hadayan, pandaran, mano manāyatanam, mana
indriyam (or manindriyam), viññāṇa, viññānakkhandha. [Yaṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ
paṇḍaraṃ mano manāyatanaṃ manindriyaṃ viññāṇaṃ viññāṇakkhandho...] A Tipiṭaka reference is
given in the post, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and Bhavaṅga.”
§ Amazingly, these nine steps occur within a split second, and the Buddha said there are billions
of citta arising within the blink of an eye. Each citta has three stages: uppāda, ṭhiti, bhaṅga
(rising, stability, dissolution), and these nine steps occur before it comes to the bhaṅga or the
termination stage.
§ It may be hard to believe, but we can prove this to be true with the following example.
4. Suppose three people A, B, C are sitting in a small coffee shop. They are all facing the door, and
person X walks in. Suppose that person X is a close friend of A, worst enemy of B, and that C does
not know X at all. We will also assume that all are males.
§ So, let us see what happens within a split second. A recognizes X as his friend, and a smile
comes to his face. B recognizes X as his enemy and his face gets darkened.
§ On the other hand, C’s mind does not register anything about X, and X is just another person to
him. He immediately goes back to whatever he was doing.
5. That is an example of a “cakkhu viññāṇa,” a “seeing event.” It is over within a split second, just
like taking a photo with a camera takes only a split second, where the image in captured on the screen
instantaneously.
§ However, something very complicated happens in a human mind when a “seeing event”
occurs.
§ It is critically important to go slow and analyze what happens so that we can see how
complicated this process is (for a human mind) to capture that “seeing event.” It is much more
complicated than just recording “a picture” in a camera.
6. Within that split second, A recognizes X as his good friend, and pleasant emotions arise in his
mind, and he becomes happy. B recognizes X as his worse enemy, and bad emotions arise in his
mind, and he becomes angry. On the other hand, C identifies X as a man or a woman, and no feelings
occur in him.
§ We don’t think twice about these observations usually. But if one carefully analyzes what
happens, one can easily see that this is an amazingly complex process.
§ How does the SAME “seeing event” (seeing X) lead to all these very different changes in the
minds of three different people? (and the emotions even show up on their faces!)
§ No one but a Buddha can see this fast time evolution of a citta.
§ The Buddha has analyzed this process in minute detail. We will discuss only the critical basic
features here.
Nothing Faster in the World Than the Arising of a Citta
7. Buddha said it is hard to find any phenomena in this world that change faster than the mind:
“WebLink: suttacentral: Aṅguttara Nikāya (1.48)“.
The short sutta says: “Nāhaṃ, bhikkhave, aññaṃ ekadhammampi samanupassāmi yaṃ evaṃ
lahuparivattaṃ yathayidaṃ cittaṃ. Yāvañcidaṃ, bhikkhave, upamāpi na sukarā yāva lahuparivattaṃ
cittan”ti.”
Translated: “I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as
citta. It is not easy to find an analogy (a simile) to show how quickly citta can change.”
Three Features of a Seeing Event (Cakkhu Viññāṇa)
8. The “seeing event” has three essential features:
§ One definitely gets into an emotional state (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral, which is called
sukha, dukha, and upekkha in Pāli), and that is called vedanā.
§ One recognizes the object, and that is called saññā.
§ Based on vedanā and saññā, one also generates other mental characteristics such as anger, joy.
Those are none other than saṅkhāra.
§ Of course, this holds for all six types of viññāṇa.
9. Viññāṇa can be called the overall sense experience encompassing all those three: vedanā, saññā,
saṅkhāra.
§ But viññāṇa can be more than the sum of those three, and that requires another write-up. It is
not necessary for the current discussion.
§ We can safely say that viññāṇa (or more correctly viññānakkhandha) is the overall sensory
experience.
10. So, we can see that those three people, A, B, and C will have three different “states of mind” upon
that seeing event.
§ That “mindset” with a set of vedanā, saññā, and saṅkhāra is called a viññāṇa.
§ Viññāṇa is the overall sensory experience that includes all those. And that takes place within a
split second.
§ There are six types of viññāṇa corresponding to the six sense faculties.
11. Several key important basic features come out from this simple example.
§ There is no single entity called “viññāṇa.” When we hear something a “sota viññāṇa” arises,
when we taste something a jivhā viññāṇa occurs, etc. Altogether there are six types viññāṇa
that are associated with the six sense faculties we have. Those are cakkhu (see), sota (hear),
ghāṇa (smell), jivhā (taste), kāya (touch), and mano (mind).
§ Any of those will lead to the following outcomes: sukha, dukha, or upekkha vedanā;
recognition of what type of picture, sound, etc., it is (saññā); other types of cetasika arising
(called saṅkhāra) depending on the sound heard AND the “nature” of the person
(character/habits or gati).
§ This last one, the “nature” of a person, is called that person’s gati (sometimes written as gathi).
Each person has a unique (but changing) set of good and bad gati. I am not going to discuss this
here, but there are many posts on the website on gati.
Dependence on the “Thought Object”
12. Let us take a different scenario: Let us assume that X is B’s girlfriend — who is not in good terms
with A — and that C is a young male who has never seen X.
§ Now, we see that the moods of A and B will reversed. A will be instantaneously unhappy to see
X, and B will be happy to X.
§ Regarding C, the situation could be different than before. If X appears attractive to him, C may
instantaneously form a lustful state of mind.
13. So, we see that the type of cakkhu viññāṇa depends on primarily two things. It depends on the
particular person experiencing it, and the sense object in question (it is called an ārammaṇa in Pāli).
§ In the above two cases, A and B experienced different types of viññāṇa. But their experiences
reversed when the sense object changed.
§ In the case of C seeing an attractive woman, even though he had no prior contact with her,
lustful viññāṇa arose in C, due to his “lustful” gati.
§ If C were an Arahant, C would only generate an upekkha viññāṇa when seeing the X. An
Arahant has removed all gati; one needs to learn about gati to fully understand this point.
14. Now we see that for a given person, there is no permanently set good or bad viññāṇa. What
kind of viññāṇa arises depends on the gati of the person and the sense object.
§ We usually call someone a “good person” based on his/her overall character, i.e., if that person
displays more “good character” than “bad character” over time. But only an Arahant can be
called a “definitely a moral person,” acting 100% morally all the time.
§ Even though this is a complex subject, the basic features are those mentioned above. One needs
to analyze different situations in one’s mind to get these ideas firmly grasped. That is real
vipassanā meditation!
§ One needs to understand how the mind works to make progress on the Path. The Buddha said
that his Dhamma has never been known to the world. And it has the MIND in the forefront.
Furthermore, the mind is the most complex entity in the world.
Simple Explanation of the Nine Steps
15. The first stage, citta, is just awareness that comes with the “uncontaminated” vedanā and saññā
and five other universal mental factors (cetasika): phassa, cetanā, manasikara, ekaggatā, and
jivitindriya. One is just aware that one is alive and is experiencing something.
§ At the “mano” stage, the mind has “measured” what the object is (මැන ීම [mænīma or
Measurement] in Sinhala). For example, whether it is a tree or a human or a bird.
§ In the next “mānasaṃ” stage, the mind is can distinguish among different species. For example,
whether it is just a woman or one’s own mother or whether it is a parrot or a humming bird.
That is the “pure and complete awareness”: one sees the external world as it is. An Arahant‘s
mind will not be contaminated beyond this stage.
16. At the next “hadayan” (හාද වීම [hāda vīma or Trouble shooting] in Sinhala) phase, the mind
gets attached to the object (or repulsed by it) based on one’s prior experiences and gati.
§ This attachment gets stronger in the next several stages and by the time reaches the viññāṇa
stage, it can be fully “corrupted.”
§ Finally, that viññāṇa or the viññāṇakkhandha gets incorporated to the aggregate of viññāṇa or
the viññāṇakkhandha. With each thought, the viññāṇakkhandha grows.
17. One crucial observation is that C’s mind stopped at the “mānasaṃ” stage in the first example
above. (That is only partially correct, but we don’t need to get to details here). However, in the
second example, it got contaminated.
§ Of course, an Arahant‘s mind will never get contaminated beyond the “mānasan” stage for
ANY sense object.
§ Specifically: no lobha, dosa, or moha will arise in an Arahant regardless of what the sense
input is.
18. Hopefully, the above basic description will clarify how a citta gets contaminated automatically
according to one’s personality (gati) and the sense object.
§ The critical point is that we do not have control over those initial citta that arises automatically
at the first exposure to the sense object.
§ However, when we become aware of this initial response, we CAN control our subsequent
by being mindful. That is the key to Ānāpāna and Satipaṭṭhāna meditations and is a
citta
different topic. For details, see “Bhāvanā (Meditation)” and “Living Dhamma” and “Paṭicca
Samuppada” sections.
19. Finally, another critical point is that the six types of viññāṇa that we just discussed are all
VIPĀKA viññāṇa. These arise due to past kamma, i.e., as kamma vipāka.
§ Then there are KAMMA viññāṇa that we create ourselves; see, “Kamma Viññāṇa – Link
Between Mind and Matter.”
§ When the Buddha said that we need to stop defiled viññāṇa from arising, he was referring to
the kamma viññāṇa. We have control over them. We have control over kamma viññāṇa. But we
do not have control vipāka viññāṇa, which are due to past kamma.
§ Details on kamma viññāṇa in the post “Do I Have “A Mind” That Is Fixed and “Mine”?”.
One’s state of mind at a given moment depends on one’s own gati (character and habits) AND
the external sense object.
12.2.2 The Amazing Mind – Critical Role of Nāmagotta (Memories)
1. Here we will discuss the critical importance of nāmagotta (our memory records). Even though I
had written it as “nāma gotta” previously, I noticed that in some suttas it is written as “nāmagotta“,
one word.
§ Let us take person X. If someone shows X an apple, he will say, “that is an apple, and I know
how it smells and tastes”. Suppose X loses all memory right after that. Now, will X be able to
identify that as an apple? Of course not.
§ This is another amazing thing about the mind. It can search one’s previous experiences with a
given object (in this case an apple), and remember what an apple looks like, smells, tastes like,
etc, i.e., all the distinguishing properties of an apple. And it can do that in a billionth of a
second!
§ We discussed this in detail at: “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)“.
2. Think carefully about the following: If X loses all memories, he will not know what to do with a
plate of food put in front of him; he would not identify that as a pizza, a sandwich, etc.
§ If he is at work when the memory loss happens, X will not know how to go home, or even what
is meant by “home” and that he is supposed to go home at a certain time.
§ If he gets urge to go to the bathroom, X will not know that he is supposed to do in the bathroom
or where the bathroom is.
§ You can think about zillions of things that we take for granted every day, that X will not be able
to do. In fact, X will not be able to function at all!
3. This is why a little baby of a few months of age does not recognize anything and does not have any
control over “bathroom functions”.
§ A baby’s brain is not developed and thus cannot make contact with the mano loka, where
memories are; see, “Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Loka (Mind Plane)”
and “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)“.
§ This is why a baby is TOTALLY dependent on parents until about an year old, until the brain is
developed to some extent.
4. Now, suppose that person X, who has lost all his memories, takes a bite of the apple. Of course, he
will taste the sweetness, but he will not be able to IDENTIFY that as “apple taste”.
§ Furthermore, X may not even generate a liking or the desire to take another bite, unless he is
hungry.
§ This also proves that the CRAVING for the taste of apple was not in the apple. Cravings
are associated with one’s anusaya. And those anusaya cannot come to the surface as āsava,
unless one’s memories are intact.
5. With his memories lost, X’s vedanā and saññā will be pretty close to “uncontaminated”
pabhassara citta. He will experience a taste (without identifying it as taste of apple). But he will not
generate any sobhana or asobhana cetasika based on any type of attractive or repulsive sense input.
§ But of course, he has not attained the Arahant stage. His anusaya will be with him, just as new
born baby will have all its anusaya with it.
§ If X lost his memory due to brain damage, his anusaya will not resurface until next birth if the
brain is permanently damaged. In fact, this has really happened to a person and his story is
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1104 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
detailed in the book, “Patient H.M. : A Story of Memory, Madness, and Family Secrets” by
Luke Dittrich.
6. In fact, this has really happened to a person and his story is detailed in the book, “Patient H.M. : A
Story of Memory, Madness, and Family Secrets” by Luke Dittrich.
§ Here we must remember that our memories that in the nāma loka can be recalled only by the
mana indriya in the brain — as long as the gandhabba is inside the physical body; see,
“Namagotta, Bhava, Kamma Beeja, and Mano Loka (Mind Plane)“, “Memory, Brain, Mind,
Nama Loka, Kamma Bhava, Kamma Vipāka”, “Gandhabba Sensing the World – With and
Without a Physical Body“, and “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“. One needs to
spend some time to clarify this key concept.
§ It is clear that the surgeons had inadvertently removed part of the brain of “patient H.M.” that
contained the mana indirya (surgeons were trying to stop regular seizures that the patient was
experiencing by removing parts of his brain).
§ With more studies in the future, we may be able to identify the location of the mana indirya in
the brain.
7. This is why a new-born baby (within a year or so from birth) has a very limited capability for
perceptions: the brain has not developed to be able to process all the information that comes through
the sense faculties.
§ Therefore, a new-born baby’s brain does not have the ability to transfer anything useful to the
hadaya vatthu for it to identify objects or match each with the set of anusaya and to generate
cravings or dislikes for that sense input.
§ A baby’s hidden anusaya will not show up until its brain develops. The brain function attains
the full capacity around 7 years of age according to the Buddha: One can even attain
Arahanthood if one is over 7 years of age.
§ It is important to know what is meant by anusaya and āsava: “Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and
Āsava”.
§ The role of the brain is discussed at: “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“.
8. We can get a good idea of how the mind of an Arahant works by thinking about the experiences of
X who has lost all his memories. The only difference is that in the case of X, all his anusaya are
intact, but they cannot be “triggered”.
§ For an Arahant, all gati and āsava/anusaya have been removed via cultivating paññā.
§ But an Arahant will have all his memories intact. In fact, if he has developed abhiññā powers,
he will be able to recall memories not only from this life but many, many lives in the past.
9. Most of our cravings are associated with our past habits and desires. Each person has a set that is
unique to him/her, AND that set of habits/cravings will change over time.
§ All gati and āsava/anusaya arise or — are with oneself — because of the inability to get rid of
defilements due to ignorance of the real nature of this world: anicca, dukkha, anatta, asubha,
etc.
§ When one is on the Path, one will gradually get rid of “bad gati” and cultivate “good gati“.
Then, at some point one will be able to comprehend the anicca nature and one’s paññā will
grow and one’s anusaya will be PERMANENTLY removed in four stages of Nibbāna.
§ One should read up on those Pāli terms, if one does not understand them. It does not make
sense to translate those terms to English, because no single English word will convey the
same meaning as a Pāli word.
§ This is NOT memorization. One should comprehend what is MEANT by a Pāli word, not
memorize it.
10. Suppose X is a young male. When X — if he has lost his memories — sees an attractive woman,
he will see her as an attractive person. But he will not generate any lust for her, no matter how
beautiful she is. It is just “seeing” for him.
§ That “picture” which comes to mind cannot match it with X’s past experiences with women.
His kāma rāga anusaya is still there, but it is not awakened.
§ Similarly, X will not generate any angry thoughts when seeing “an enemy”; he just does not
have any recollection of the past encounters with the person.
§ In the same way, X may touch a red-hot iron, because he has no idea that it can burn.
§ This is also why little babies touch or even try to eat anything and everything: they have no
prior experience that some of those could be harmful.
11. These days, there are many “philosopher-types” (such as Ekhart Tolle or even Buddhist teachers),
who say “forget the past and live in the moment”.
§ That is utter nonsense.
§ One CANNOT forget the past AND live in the present. What the Buddha said is to live the
present moment mindfully, making sure not to make bad decisions — that one may have
made in the past.
§ The Buddha had the perfect memory. He could remember things as far back as he wished.
Often he would give accounts of what had happened in past lives and teach people how to learn
lessons from the past.
12. Finally, in the beginning of the “WebLink: suttacentra: Mahāmālukya Sutta (MN 64)“, the
Buddha points out this fact that sakkāya diṭṭhi cannot arise in a new-born baby, exactly because what
we discussed above: there is no way to trigger the hidden anusaya in that baby.
§ To quote the above translation: “For a young tender infant lying prone does not even have
the notion ‘identity,’ so how could identity view (sakkāya diṭṭhi) arise in him? “
§ The Pāli verse is: “Daharassa hi, mālukyaputta, kumārassa mandassa uttānaseyyakassa
sakkāyotipi na hoti, kuto panassa uppajjissati sakkāyadiṭṭhi? “.
§ I had forgotten the name of the sutta. Thanks to reader Siebe for pointing this out at the
discussion forum.
12.2.3 State of Mind in the Absence of Citta Vithi – Bhavanga
1. We have what we can call “an active mind” in the following two cases:
§ When we are experiencing sense inputs (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching),
especially when those are of sufficient interest. In these cases pañcadvāra citta vīthi with 17
citta results, as we discussed in the post, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought
(Citta)“.
§ We also generate “active thoughts” when we are remembering a past event, contemplating on a
Dhamma concept or learning some subject like mathematics. Here we have manodvāra citta
vīthi which can have 10-12 citta normally, but in some special cases may have large numbers of
manodvāra citta running continuously.
Bhavaṅga – State of Mind
2. On the other hand, there are many times where we just have some kind of “mindset” (joyful, sad,
angry, etc.), without even generating thoughts (citta).
§ For example, many people get into a “state of sorrow” after hearing about the sudden death of a
parent, spouse, etc. Even when they are not thinking about that person, they may be just sitting
somewhere with very clear features of sadness on their faces.
§ Sometimes people get very scared and it shows in their faces, but they cannot even think. They
are too scared to think or to speak: “frozen in fear”.
§ Same thing happens when one gets very angry: They may not say anything but we can see the
anger in their faces. They themselves may not do what to do.
3. So, there are many such cases where we just get into a certain state of mind, which can be called “a
temporary existence or bhava“: the above three examples correspond to “sad bhava“, “scared
bhava“, and “angry bhava” respectively.
§ Such a “temporary bhava” or “temporary state of mind” can last many minutes or even
days. These may be denoted by BT, compared to one’s natural bhavaṅga state, which we
can denote by B. After some time the B state will slowly fade away to fall back to the natural
T
B state.
§ Active citta vīthi may run during such a BT (or B)state, but then they fall back to that BT (or B)
state.
§ This natural bhavaṅga state (B) is the mindset grasped at the cuit-paṭisandhi moment; see
below.
Connection of “Bhava” to Gati
4. We can see right away that “angry bhava” comes easily to those who are easy to get angry. Such
people can be “triggered” easily; just saying some wrong words can make them angry.
§ Same is true for other types of “temporary bhava“. Some can be easily frightened. Some can be
easily tempted with sense pleasures.
§ The tendency to easily get into such “temporary bhava” will be reduced when one makes
progress on the Path. I know that by experience.
§ When one finally gets to the Arahant stage, one will not get into any “temporary bhava“; one
has lost all such gati. One will have what is called “an unshakable calm state of mind”.
§ Thus, for an Arahant, only the natural bhavaṅga state (B) will be there until death.
5. An important extension of the idea discussed above is that the bhavaṅga that we have for “the
current human bhava” was grasped at the last cuti-paṭisandhi moment: When we exhausted the
kammic energy for the last bhava that we were in, and grasped this human bhava.
§ Since a human bhava is grasped with a “good nimitta” that was associated with a “good gati”
we had AT THE MOMENT that we did that good deed (or the “good kamma“), our current
bhavaṅga reflects that gati.
§ However, that “natural bhavaṅga” (unlike any “temporary bhava“) is hard to see,
especially by oneself. It is like we cannot see our own eyes (we can only see a reflection of it
by a mirror).
6. But the fact that it is easier for some to grasp concepts than another comes from whether one’s
bhavaṅga is “better” than that other person’s. In other words, one with a tihetuka birth will have a
better natural bhavaṅga (B) compared to one with a dvihetuka birth.
§ The point is that even if one has a “not so good bhavaṅga” (which may not be possible to verify
anyway), one is better off as a human than uncountable beings in lower realms. We really need
to make use of this rare human bhava.
§ I had written a post about bhavaṅga sometime back (which describes it from another angle),
which you may want to read now to “seal in” your understanding: “Bhava and Bhavaṅga –
Simply Explained!“.
Analogy for Switching from Bhavaṅga to Active Mind
7. Now we are in a position to see how the mind switches back and forth between bhavaṅga states (B
or BT) and active states (with citta vīthi).
§ However, it is important to note that NO ONE will be actually “see” or “discern for oneself”
how this switching happens. Such fast processes can be seen only by the mind of a Buddha.
§ But we can see for ourselves that these minute descriptions are indeed consistent with our
experiences. That is what builds confidence in Buddha Dhamma.
8. Before proceeding further, we need to remember that citta arise in the base of mind (hadaya
vatthu) which is located in the mental body (gandhabba).
§ The gandhabba is totally shielded from the outside by the dense physical body. All sense inputs
come through the six “doors” in the body (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and the mana indriya
in the brain).
§ If you need top refresh memory, this is discussed in “Our Mental Body – Gandhabba” and other
posts.
9. I have read the following nice analogy somewhere, but have forgotten where it was. In this
analogy, a man is sitting in the middle of a totally enclosed small hut with six windows. He is sitting
at a desk in the middle of the hut, but can easily look up and see any of the six windows.
§ The mental body (gandhabba) trapped inside the physical human body is like the man sitting at
the table in the hut.
§ When the mind is totally focused on the bhavaṅga state, that is comparable to the man totally
absorbed in reading a book sitting at that table. He is not aware of what is happening outside
the hut at all.
§ In the same way, the gandhabba in the bhavaṅga state has no awareness of what is going on
outside the human body. It is focused on the bhavaṅga (the nimitta grasped at the beginning of
this bhava).
10. The man in the hut could be distracted from the book if a disturbance happens at one of the
windows. For example, someone could come to a window and knock on it. Then the man would look
up from the book at the window where the disturbance was.
§ This is like a sense signal from one of five physical sense doors coming to one of the five
pasāda rūpa around the hadaya vatthu. The hadaya vatthu — surrounded by the five pasāda
rūpa — is like the man sitting in the hut with six windows.
§ The only difference is that signals for the mana indriya come directly to the hadaya vatthu,
instead of coming through a sixth pasāda rūpa.
Components of a Citta Vīthi
11. When a signal comes to one of the five pasāda rūpa, the hadaya vatthu‘s attention to the
bhavaṅga state will be disturbed. Then three citta will rise to break away from the bhavaṅga state.
§ Those three citta are called atita bhavaṅga (atita means “old” or “past” in Pali or Sinhala),
bhavaṅga calana (calana — pronounced “chalana” — means move or vibrate), and bhavaṅga
ucceda (ucceda means to “cut-off”).
§ Just like it would take the man in the hut a few moments to becomes aware of the disturbance at
the window and to look up, it will take those three cittās to pass before the hadaya vatthu
“breaks away” from the bhavaṅga state. Then it will investigate what the disturbance is.
12. Now, hadaya vatthu will look to see which of the five pasāda rūpa is disturbed, with another
citta. That citta is called the “pancadvāravajjana citta“, where panaca dvara means “five doors”
referring to the five five physical senses.
§ If it turns out that the signal is coming through the ghāṇa pasāda rūpa (i.e., a smell), then the
mind will turn to that door. Then a ghānadvara citta arises. That will be the fifth citta in the
citta vīthi.
§ Now the mind will “accept” that signal; this is called a “sampaticcana citta“.
§ Then it will fully realize what that signal is with another citta: “santirana citta“.
§ Up to this point, there have been three bhavaṅga citta, a pancadvāravajjana citta, a
ghānadvara citta (or any one of the five pañcadvāra citta), a sampaticcana citta, and
a santirana citta; seven cittās in all. All these are vipāka citta.
13. The eighth citta in the citta vīthi is called a “vottapana citta“. This is a very important citta,
where one’s mind decides to take action based on the sense input that it received.
§ How to respond to a given sense input is automatically decided by the mind, based on one’s
gati (gathi). We have discussed this before: see, for example, “The Law of Attraction, Habits,
Character (Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)“, “How Are Gati and Kilesa Incorporated into
Thoughts?“, “Cetasika – Connection to Gathi“, and “Gathi (Gati), Anusaya, and Āsava“.
§ Depending on the sense input and one’s gati, the mind may decide to ignore the sense input or
to take action if gets gets attracted to the sense input.
§ Possible actions will include one or more of the following: Thinking along the same lines to
oneself/ talking out about it (with vacī saṅkhāra), and possibly taking bodily actions (with kāya
saṅkhāra).
14. Then, such actions are implemented with 7 javana citta; see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of
Mental Power“.
§ Any and all kamma are generated in those 7 javana citta. This is where vacī saṅkhāra and kāya
saṅkhāra are generated. Then those are implemented by the brain, as needed.
§ After those 7 javana citta, the citta vīthi ends with two tadārammana (T) or bhavaṅga (B) citta,
as we discuss next.
15. Now we can represent a pañcadvāra citta vīthi as follows:
“AB BC BU PD CV Sam San V J J J J J J J T T”
§ This is discussed in detail in the post, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
§ In that case, the last two citta will fall back to the natural bhavaṅga state, B, so now the citta
vīthi is: “AB BC BU PD CV Sam San V J J J J J J J B B”.
§ Such a citta vīthi is called a mahantārammana (strong) citta vīthi.
18. If the sense input is not strong enough to generate an interest in the mind, no javana citta will be
generated.
§ Such citta vīthi are called parittārammana (weak) or atiparittārammna (very weak) citta
vīthi. Parittārammana citta vīthi are involved in dreaming. Atiparittārammna citta vīthi are
involved in breathing. Obviously, we don’t even notice those citta vīthi of the last and weakest
type.
§ For more details, see; “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power“.
1. There is much confusion about these two key Pāli words: bhava and bhavaṅga. By clarifying what
is meant by them, it would be much easier to comprehend many concepts in Buddha Dhamma; for
example, how laws of kamma are enforced by nature via Paṭicca Samuppāda.
§ Even in current Theravada texts, there is confusion about the difference between bhava and jāti.
If you have not read the post, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein”, I
recommend reading that first.
§ Please do not be discouraged by the Pāli terms. There are no suitable English terms for some of
them, and it is better to learn them. Read through first even if you don’t get the full meaning. It
will become clear. I will make it simple in this post.
§ I will make one or two more posts on this subject to include references from the Tipiṭaka.
2. Basically, bhava means “the potential for existence” in EITHER one of the 31 realms of possible
existence (we can see just the human and animal realms) OR as some specific state of mind within
the current life.
§ In the first category, there is human bhava, animal bhava, Tusita deva bhava, peta bhava,
abhassara brahma bhava, etc.: existence in one of the 31 possible realms. As we will see
below, many such “potential bhava” exists for each living being, and at the end of the current
bhava, a new one will grasped based on the relative energies for various bhava (kamma beeja)
that one has cultivated in one’s past.
§ Even during this lifetime, we “live under different existences” based on significant life events.
This is the second category. For example, a normally “good person” may become violent for a
short time upon seeing his wife in bed with another man, or one will live in a “state of sorrow”
for many days upon the death of a loved one.
§ Both those are “bhava”, states of existence.
3. Bhavaṅga (“bhava” + “anga”, where anga means “part”) therefore means a “state of the mind”
that is inseparable for a period of existence.
§ When not disturbed by a strong external sense input (via the five physical senses or the mana
indriya), a human mind is in its natural bhavaṅga state received at the beginning of this human
bhava. Each person’s bhavaṅga state is different (it is based on the sense object taken in at the
paṭisandhi moment), and it feels kind of “neutral” to each person. For example, when one is in
deep sleep or “just staring out into space”, one’s mind is likely to be in one’s natural
bhavaṅga state, which we can denote by B.
§ On the other hand, when one’s mind is deeply affected by some event like in the examples we
mentioned above, then the mind goes into a “temporary bhavaṅga state” corresponding to that
event (“state of rage” when really angry or “state of sadness” upon the death of a loved one).
We can denote this by BT.
4. Now, this “state of mind” (whether it B or BT) could be interrupted by a citta vīthi triggered by an
external sense input coming through one of the the five physical senses or the mana indriya.
§ For example, when another loved comes to pay respects to the dead loved one (who is in a “sad
BT“), one’s mind may become happy just for a few minutes upon seeing that person. Then they
may recall a past event about the dead person and both may get sad again. That “sad temporary
bhavaṅga state” (BT) may not go away for several days. And then the mind will gradually fall
back to the natural bhavaṅga state, B.
§ For less strong life events, that temporary state mind may last only minutes or hours.
§ For example, if one sees an old friend on the street, one’s mind may become happy while they
talk excitedly, and when the friend departs after talking for a while, that BT state may linger for
a little while more, but then could be suppressed when another thought process based on
remembering a task that one needed to get done urgently.
5. Therefore, within a given day, one’s mind could get into several BT states. But unless a BT state is
triggered by a significant life event like the lost of a loved one, the mind would fall back to the
natural B state by the time one wakes up next morning.
§ For the reasons discussed above, the natural bhavaṅga state, B, could be called the “uppatti
bhavaṅga”, and those temporary bhavaṅga states, BT, could be called “pavutti bhavaṅga”.
§ However, such labels are not used either in the suttas or in Abhidhamma. I just mention that to
make the connection better.
6. Please read the above discussion again. That should help one get the basic ideas about what bhava
and bhavaṅga are. It is important to note that bhavaṅga is a state of the mind, not citta vīthi
(thoughts).
§ Another way to describe a bhavaṅga state is to say that while the mind is in that state, one has
corresponding gati (gathi). This is also an important aspect.
§ For example, when one gets into a BT state of anger, then one of course has predominantly
“angry gati” during that time. Furthermore, one who generally has cultivated “angry gati” is
also likely to get into BT state easily.
§ By the way, the Sinhala word for bhava is just bava (බව). For example, when one sees an eye-
catching thing and generates a “lobha bhava” at that moment: ල ෝභ බව ආවාම ල ෝභයෙක්
වෙනවා.
7. Another important aspect is the when one is in an “angry BT state”, it is easier to generate more
angry thoughts. This is due to the “Annantatra and Samanantara Paccaya”: That “state of the mind” is
receptive to more angry thoughts. This is why it is important to try to get the mind away from the
angry state to focus on something entirely different.
§ It is a good idea to contemplate on the above basic ideas with examples from one’s own life.
For example, when one is angry at someone, it is easier to recall more such bad past
experiences with that person, and to suppress any past good experiences coming to the mind.
8. When one is having a calm state of the mind when reading/listening to Dhamma, it is easier to
generate compassionate thoughts about others. Therefore, it is important to “set the background”
when one is starting on an important task.
§ This is why in the old days people went to a temple and offered flowers, etc and chanted gåthå,
before sitting down to listen to a desanā by a bhikkhu. The state of mind is very important. One
cannot comprehend deep Dhamma if the mind is in an angry state or even in an excited state
(like thinking about a sick child at home, for example).
§ This is why it is a good idea to at least recite the qualities of the Triple Gem (Buddha,
Dhamma, Saṅgha) before starting a formal meditation session; see, “Buddhist Chanting“.
9. Another important application of the “Annantatra and Samanantara Paccaya” relevant to this case
is that while in a human bhava, only kamma vipāka that are “compatible” with the human bhava and
human gati (and thus human body) can bring in vipāka.
§ Even if one has kamma beeja suitable to bring harsh vipāka experienced in the apāyas, they
will not be able to bring vipāka as long as one is with a human body. In the same way, any
highly pleasurable vipāka have to wait until one is born in a deva bhava with a fine body
suitable to experience such good vipāka.
§ An animal always lives with fear for its life; that is part of bhavaṅga. Similarly, a tihetuka
human has a natural pleasant demeanor; an ahetuka human (handicapped, etc) has a weakened
mindset. A dvihetuka is in between.
10. Yet another is the state of the mind at the dying moment, when the grasping of a new bhava is
getting close (if bhava energy is to run out at death, i.e., if there are no more jāti left in the current
bhava).
§ Here the kammic power will start bringing various thoughts to the mind via the mana indriya
that are compatible with the strongest kamma beeja. For example, one who is about to grasp a
new life in the hell (niraya) may start recalling some fear-generating events (even from
previous lives), and one’s mind could be bent to a “fearful temporary bhavaṅga state (BT)”.
Then more and more such fearful events will start coming in to the mind.
§ This is why some dying people’s fear can be seen in their eyes, even if their bodies have
become non-responding.
§ Some people start to yell with fear when they see an especially unpleasant bhava coming their
way. Flashes of the existence awaiting will come to their minds, for example, burning in hell, or
being cut by sharp weapons, or just seeing others engulfed in flames.
§ On the good side, some people will remain calm with a pleasant look on their face, even if the
body is becoming non-responding. Some smile when they see a scenery of the happy
environment that they are going to.
§ There are many things like that, which can be explained this basic knowledge.
11. For those who are familiar with Abhidhamma, bhavaṅga citta are called “dvāramutta citta” or
citta that arise without needing a sense door. Let me clarify this in simple terms.
§ When we hear something, what happens is that the sound comes through our ears, and many
citta vīthi will be generated at the manodvara (mind-door) after that initiating sotadvara citta
vīthi. Then a seeing event may be started by a picture seen with eyes, etc.
§ This is a very fast process. For example, when we watch a movie we get sense inputs to the ears
and eyes very rapidly. But citta vīthi flow so fast that the mind will fall to a bhavaṅga state (B
or BT) even in between those rapidly incoming citta vīthi.
§ Therefore, what we see, hear, taste, smell, or body touches are all due to citta vīthi. Even our
thoughts generated by the mind (coming through the mana indriya), are due to citta vīthi.
12. In contrast, a bhavaṅga state (B or BT) DOES NOT come though any of the five physical senses
(eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body) or the mana indriya in the brain. That is why it is called “dvāramutta
citta” or “citta that arise without the need for a sense door”.
§ Therefore, bhavaṅga is sort of a “stationary state of the mind” that it falls back to when there
are no running citta vīthi.
§ Note that the mana indriya — where concepts and memories come to the mind — is unknown
to scientists; see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“.
§ Bhavaṅga (B or BT) is just a state of the mind with a corresponding gati. There are no
associated citta vīthi. But of course, some bhavaṅga citta can appear in a citta vīthi; see, “Citta
Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
13. It is also important to note that citta do not run without break. It is the kammic energy that runs
without a break during samsara.
§ For example, when one is born in the asanna realm, there will be no citta generated for 500
maha kalpa. Remember that a maha kalpa is the age of our Solar system, which lasts about 15
billions years!
§ During that whole time, the body of that being in the asanna realm is kept alive by the kammic
energy for that bhava, and the bhavaṅga is active during that time. As we emphasized above,
bhavaṅga is a state of mind.
14. Please keep in mind that it is not necessary to learn the material in #11 and #12 above. If one can
grasp the basic idea of what is meant by bhava and bhavaṅga that is enough to grasp important
concepts at a bit deeper level.
§ We will continue this discussion in one or more upcoming posts.
1. Thoughts (citta) do not arise as individual cittā; see, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a
Thought (Citta)“.
They arise in the mind due to sense inputs from the five physical senses (cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, jivhā,
and kāya indriya corresponding respectively to eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body) and also by the
mana indriya (located in the brain see, “Brain – Interface between Mind and Body“).
§ As we discussed in the post, “What is Mind? How do we Experience the Outside World?“, each
of our sense inputs coming in though any one of the five physical senses is received and
analyzed by the mind in a “citta vīthi” (series of cittā) with 17 cittā. These are called
pañcadvāra citta vīthi. Pañcadvāra (“pañca” + “dvāra” where “pañca” is five and “dvāra” is
door) means five (physical) doors.
§ Vīthi is pronounced “veethi”; in fact, the actual Pāli (and Sinhala) term is veethi (meaning
“road”), since like a road, the flow is continuous. But vīthi has become the established English
word, just like “pīti” for the actual word “preethi“. And, citta is pronounced “chiththā”.
§ When we THINK ABOUT those external sense inputs, that is done via manodvāra citta vīthi,
which involve only the brain and the mind (those are not the same). These citta vīthi normally
have 10-12 cittā in them.
§ Here we will describe both types of citta vīthi.
2. According to citta niyama (or Law of Cittā), a pañcadvāra citta vīthi proceeds in a standard way
for an object with great intensity (atimahantarama citta vīthi). That means the object is of high
interest and also the conditions for the object to be grasped are optimum; for example, if it is a visual
object, that visual object is of high interest and also the light conditions for seeing that object are
good.
The sequence of cittā in a pañcadvāra citta vīthi is as follows:
Pancadvara Citta Vīthi
§ Then the mind looks at the “five physical senses or pañcadvāra (PD)” and determines through
which of the five sense input is coming through, and then picks the relevant door, which in the
present case we assumed to be cakkhu viññāṇa (CV).
§ Then it investigates what that “picture” is, with the Sampaticcana (Sam) citta, decides what
type (like, dislike, etc) with the Santirana (San) citta, and determines what actions to take with
the Vottapana (V) citta.
§ The all important 7 javana citta arise based on that determination made with the Vottapana
citta (V). This is where potent kamma are done by the mind.
§ The vottapana citta is the same as manodvāra citta (MD) where the decision is made (see
below in manodvāra citta vīthi).
§ In the last two Tadarammana (T) cittā, the mind takes in the “flavor” or the “essence” of the
sense object, and then falls back to the bhavaṅga state at the termination of the pañcadvāra
citta vīthi. Only the very strong (mahantarammana) citta vīthi have them, and it is those strong
impressions that are “recorded in memory”.
The Simile of Tasting a Mango
1. A pañcadvāra citta vīthi is the procedure by which the mind experiences an external object (sight,
sound, taste, etc). In the commentaries to the Tipiṭaka, what happens in a pañcadvāra citta vīthi is
compared to the case of a man who is sleeping under a mango tree, awakened by the falling of a
mango, investigates it and decides to enjoy (experience) the taste of the mango.
2. Suppose a weary traveler is asleep at the foot of a mango tree. This state of being asleep is
analogous to the bhavaṅga state. Now a ripe mango drops to the ground near the traveler. This event
is similar to the striking of a visible object of very great intensity at the “eye door”.
3. The falling of the mango awakens the traveler and causes him to raise his head. This event is
similar to the appearance of the visible object at the eye door causing the bhavaṅga to vibrate twice
and become arrested; now he is not asleep anymore.
§ The traveler opens his eyes and looks around to enquire what the disturbance was. This is
similar to the pañcadv ravajjana (PD) citta adverting the mind towards the sense object.
4. The traveler sees the fallen mango. This is analogous to the eye-consciousness seeing the object
(CV). Now the man picks up the mango, which is similar to the sampaticchana (Sam) citta receiving
the cakkhu viññāṇa. By the way, sampaticcana comes from “san“+”paṭicca“; you can
contemplate on this to get the basic idea; see, “What is “San”?”.
§ Then the man inspects the mango to see whether it is suitable for eating. This is similar to the
santirana citta (“san” + “tirana” or “theerana“, where “theerana” means “decide on whether
the sense object is good or bad”) investigating the sense object.
§ Then the man decides that the mango is good and edible. This is similar to the votthapana
(“votta” + “pana” meaning “deciding on what to do” or in Sinhala, “pana denava” or
“energize”). Vottapana is pronounced “voththapana”. If it was a rotten mango, one would
decide to throw it away.
§ Most Pāli terms can be understood well if one understands Sinhala. As I have mentioned
before, it is the Sinhala language that is close to Pāli and not Sanskrit.
5. The man bites the mango seven times eating and enjoying the taste. This is similar to the
occurrence of seven javana cittā enjoying the taste of the sense object. These are really the “actions
corresponding to the decision made with the vottapana citta“; if the mango was bad, here the mind
will generate appropriate javana citta to throw the mango. We will discuss such complex processes
later.
§ Then the man gathers the remnants of the fruit and the juice sticking on the teeth with his
tongue and swallows twice. This is similar to the two tadarammana (T) cittā following the
javanas.
§ Task completed, the man falls back to sleep. This is similar to the resumption of the bhavaṅga
state.
6. However, according to the Tipiṭaka, each pañcadvāra citta vīthi is immediately followed by
three manodvāra citta vīthi. The javana cittā in those three citta vīthi become increasingly strong,
and it is javana cittā of the last manodvāra citta vīthi that instructs the brain to get the body to act
(and initiate speech).
§ We will discuss this in detail in the future posts. But the complete sequence of a thought
process initiated by a pañcadvāra citta vīthi takes three more manodvāra citta vīthi to be
completed. In fact, when one gets “absorbed” (for example, keeps looking at an attractive
picture), one may be generating millions of such “one plus three processes” with the mind
falling back to the bhavaṅga state repeatedly in between.
§ It will be easier to visualize this process by understanding what happens when we look at an
object, for example, in scientific terms; see, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa
(Consciousness) Arises” (especially starting with #4 of that post).
Now let us look at a typical manodvāra citta vīthi.
Manodvara Citta Vīthi
# in the Series Citta Type Symbol
§ As mentioned above the initial pañcadvāra citta vīthi is followed by three manodvāra citta
vīthi.
3. On the other hand, manodvāra citta vīthi can arise just by themselves.
§ Furthermore, even though the length of a manodvāra citta vīthi is normally 10-12 cittā for
average people, a single manodvāra citta vīthi can have many javana cittā while in a jhāna.
§ In a jhāna, such long manodvāra citta vīthi are interrupted by pañcadvāra citta vīthi that arise
in between. This is why one could hear external sounds while in a jhāna.
4. But in a jhāna samapatti, a single manodvāra citta vīthi goes on uninterrupted for long times,
with javana citta arising unceasingly :
B B B B B “BC BU MD J J J J J J J J J J J ………..
§ Thus there is no way to get back to the bhavaṅga state, or for a pañcadvāra citta vīthi or
another manodvāra citta vīthi to arise, and one becomes unaware of what happens in the
outside world. Before getting into the samapatti, one makes a determination on how long to
stay in the samapatti.
§ This is why the real power of javana citta can be truly displayed by people who can get into
jhāna samapatti.
§ This can be visualized crudely as follows: Suppose one is trying to light an oil lamp (oil-soaked
wick) with the light of a matchstick. If one is not holding the lighted matchstick steady and the
light moves in and out of the vicinity of the wick, it will not light. But if one can hold the light
steady, it will light up quickly.
§ That is probably a too crude an analogy. A better one may be given for those who are familiar
with lasers. One can drill holes in a metal plate using a laser beam. But if the laser beam is not
held steady, it will not get the metal spot to heat up and evaporate. Being in a jhāna samapatti
is like holding a laser beam quite steady on one spot for long times.
It is important to realize that a citta vīthi always starts with an external sense input due to a past
kamma, i.e., due to a kamma vipāka; see, “Avyākata Paṭicca Samuppāda for Vipāka Viññāna“.
Citta Vīthi for Attainment of Magga Phala
B B B “BC BU MD P U A G Pa Fr Fr” B B B
B B B “BC BU MD U A G Pa Fr Fr Fr” B B B
First is the magga phala citta vīthi for a normal person; the second is for one with “higher wisdom”.
§ B, BC, BU, MD are as discussed above.
§ Then it goes through the Parikamma (P), Upacara (U), Anuloma (A), Gotrabu (G), Path
(magga) (Pa), and Fruit (phala) (Fr).
§ As you can see, there is no connection to jhāna. In particular, the magga phala citta vīthi
does not go through a jhāna citta. Also, the Gotrabu (change of lineage) citta for magga phala
is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than that in the case of a jhāna citta vīthi. Change of lineage
here is to become an Ariya or a Noble Person.
B B B “BC BU MD P U A G Jh” B B B
B B B “BC BU MD U A G Jh” B B B
First is the jhāna citta vīthi for a normal person; the second is for one with “higher wisdom”.
§ B, BC, BU, MD, P, U, A, G are as discussed above.
§ Then it goes through a Jhāna (Jh) citta.
1. Philosophers through the ages have struggled to figure out how consciousness arises in a human
being. For “materialists” everything that makes a human being originates in the body, and they have
been trying to explain consciousness in terms of something that comes out from the workings of the
brain.
§ For the “dualists” consciousness is totally distinct from the material body, and falls into the
realm of theistic religion (related to a “soul”).
§ According to the Buddha, consciousness, together with the body, are two of the five
“aggregates” that a human being consists of. And Consciousness does not arise from the
body, but arises with the body at the conception.
the person in front of us is only a few feet away? Consciousness is associated with a sentient
being with a MIND. Science cannot yet explain this capability.
5. There is also the issue of the phenomenal quality of the conscious experience: qualia, subjective
feelings, the redness of red, the warmness of warmth, etc. How do these arise in a being made up of
inert atoms? There are basically two approaches to solve this problem in modern philosophy and
science:
§ One is that it arises as an emergent property in the neuronal activities in the brain. The other is
the proposal of duality by Rene Descartes in the 17th century that persist to the present; see, for
example, David Chalmers, “The Character of Consciousness”, (2010).
§ A subset of these scientists believe that consciousness is associated with the microtubules in a
cell (for example, see “The Emerging Physics of Consciousness” Ed. by Jack A. Tuszynski
(2006) and John Smythies, “Brain and Consciousness: The Ghost in the Machines”, Journal of
Scientific Exploration, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 37-50, (2009)). Despite much research, the question
of how qualia and subjective feelings arise from dead matter remains a mystery.
§ Just because a cell responds that does not necessarily mean it has consciousness; the cell can
expand and contract (chemical reactions) in response to environmental stimuli. In a way,
something similar happens when a plant turns towards sunlight; of course, plant life is not
sentient. Thus, just because an entity responses to outside influence does not necessarily mean
the entity is “mentally aware” of the outside influence, i.e., that it is conscious.
6. Therefore, all these scientists and philosophers are long way off of solving the issue of the four
mental aggregates of feelings, perceptions, volitional formations, and consciousness that make up the
mental aspects of a human being. They are mainly focusing on consciousness and perception at this
early stage, and even then are totally disregarding the intrinsic mental nature. It will be interesting to
see what progress they can make by just taking a totally materialistic approach.
7. There is evidence, though, that some leading scientists are beginning to suspect that a complete
“world view” cannot be achieved without taking into account the mental aspects. This trend started
with the invent of quantum mechanics at the beginning of the 20th century, and is gaining traction
slowly. Some interesting ideas are discussed in a number of books including “Wholeness and the
Implicate Order” (by David Bohm, 1980), “Quantum Enigma” (by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred
Kuttner, 2006), “Biocentrism” (by Robert Lanza, 2009).
§ However, attempts to explain the mind as a manifestation of quantum phenomena will also fail,
because it is the mind that precedes matter; see, “The Double Slit Experiment – Correlation
between Mind and Matter?“.
8. Consciousness (viññāṇa) discussed in this section does NOT take account the fact that
consciousness of any living being (other than an Arahant) is contaminated by defilements. This our
awareness is not pure; it is like looking though a foggy window. This is discussed in the “Viññāṇa
(Consciousness)” and “Expanding Consciousness by Purifying the Mind“.
Next, “1. Thoughts (Citta), Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) – Introduction“,
………….
12.3.2 1. Thoughts (Citta), Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya
Vatthu) – Introduction
It will be beneficial to read this post even if one is not interested in learning Abhidhamma.
1. After writing a few posts in the Abhidhamma section, I realized that it is a good idea to write
introductory posts on English meanings of some Pāli key words related to the mind. In the end,
words do not matter and what matters is grasping of the concepts involved. But conveying the
concept correctly REQUIRES the use of right words.
§ This is a bit of a problem because there are no words in English that truly conveys the meaning
of some Pāli key words when talking about the mind (like mano and viññāṇa). Thus what I
need to do is to write several introductory posts describing such keywords (like what I did for
anicca, dukkha, anatta).
§ More details will be given in the Abhidhamma section, but the posts that appear in this section
provide just the basics.
2. A Citta (pronounced “chiththa”) is widely translated as a “thought”, viññāṇa as “consciousness”
and mano as “mind”. I am going to keep using the former two, but am going to use “hadaya
vatthu” as the Pāli word for mind. Let us first discuss the reason for using this term for the mind.
§ Hadaya vatthu is where citta (thoughts) arise; thus it is appropriate to call it the mind or even
more appropriately “seat of the mind”. Hadaya vatthu is the “link” between the “mano
loka” (mind plane) and the “material plane” whether it is in kāma loka, rūpa loka or arūpa
loka (i.e., anywhere in the 31 realms). Mind or the hadaya vatthu is a very fine rūpa (matter);
in technical terms, hadaya vatthu is formed at paṭisandhi as a vatthu dasaka.
§ By the way this hadaya vatthu is the only trace of matter associated with a living being in the
arūpa loka. It is much smaller than an atom; only a form of “suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]” in
the form of a “dasaka“.
§ For example, if a cuti-paṭisandhi transition occurs from a cat to a human, then the “cat hadaya
vatthu” dies and a “human hadaya vatthu” is formed and the very next citta arises in the
“human hadaya vatthu” or the “human mind” in the “human gandhabba”; see, “Cuti-Patsandhi
Transition – Abhidhamma Description”. With that in mind, let us discuss the ultimate “primary
elements”.
3. In the absolute sense (paramatta), there are four entities: citta, cetasika (pronounced “chetasika”),
rūpa (pronounced “rüpa”), and Nibbāna. The last one, Nibbāna,does not belong to “this world” of 31
realms. Therefore, there are only citta, cetasika, and rūpa that are in anything and everything in this
world.
§ Citta and cetasika are “nama” and all tangible things are made of “rupa”.
§ There are 89 (or 121) types of citta; 52 kinds of cetasika, and 28 kinds of rūpa. These are all
listed in the “Tables and Summaries” section.
4. A citta (thought) does not arise by itself, but arises with a number of cetasika (mental factors).
There are 7 cetasika that arise with ANY citta, and normally there are other cetasika that arise in
addition to those seven. This is discussed in “Cetasika (Mental Factors)”.
§ There are “good” and “bad” cetasika. The familiar ones are lobha, dosa, moha and alobha,
adosa, amoha, but there are many others. These determine whether a given citta is a
“good” (kusala) citta or a “bad” (akusala) citta. There are only good or bad cetasika in a given
citta; they do not mix.
5. Even though a citta arises and perishes within less than billionth of a second, it gets contaminated
during its lifetime. Starting as a “pure citta” (“pabasvara citta” which is also called “prabhasvara
citta” in Sanskrit) with those 7 universal cetasika, it gradually degrades by incorporating many other
cetasika into a “contaminated citta” or viññāṇa. Without going into details, the nine steps are:
§ citta, mano, manasan, hadayan, pandaran, mana indriyan, manayatan, viññāṇa,
vinnanakkhandho. [Y aṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ paṇ araṃ mano manāyatanaṃ
ḍ
manindriyaṃ viññāṇaṃ viññāṇakkhandho...] But this happens during the life of the citta itself
(in billionth of a second) according to the “gathi” that we have. This is why we cannot control
our initial thoughts; but as those initial thoughts turn to speech and bodily actions, we
may have time to control them.
§ But we still use the term “citta” to denote the final outcome; in order to differentiate the one
that the sequences started off, we call it a “pure citta” or a “pabasvara citta“.
§ What we end up is basically what we call vinnanakhandha, and all this happens within a
billionth of a second. This “contamination process” cannot be controlled willfully at that early
stage; it happens automatically based on one’s “gathi“. The only thing we can do is to change
our “gathi“.
6. We can use the following analogy: If we start off with a glass of pure water that can be compared
to a pure citta with just the 7 universal cetasika. If we add a bit of sugar (mano), salt (manasan) it
gets a bit contaminated but we cannot see the contamination. Now we add a bit of brown sugar and
we can see the water turning to brown; this is like the hadayan stage. Then we keep adding chocolate,
milk, etc, the water gets really contaminated; but it is still mostly water. A contaminated citta is like
at the viññāṇa stage; it is a citta that is contaminated.
§ The citta of an Arahant does not contaminate beyond the masanan stage (While in the “Arahant
phala samapatti” enjoying Nibbānic bliss, an Arahant has the pabasvara citta or the pure citta).
All others get to the viññāṇa stage, but of course the “level of contamination” is much lower
even by the time one gets to the Sotāpanna stage, because one has gotten rid of any “gathi”
associated with the apāyas.
§ As we can see, it is not possible to control such a fast process by sheer will power; it is a matter
of “cleansing the mind” progressively of the contaminants of greed, hate, and ignorance.
§ Now we can see why “mano” cannot be the mind. “Mano” is just a bit “contaminated” citta. It
gets progressively contaminated and by the time it comes to the “viññāṇa” step it has captured
all relevant cetasika for that arammana or the “thought object”.
§ At the last step, a very profound thing happens. The manasikara cetasika brings in to play
all relevant past viññāṇa (which are fixed as “nama gotta”) as well as one’s “hopes and
dreams” for the future that are relevant to the “event in question”. For example, if the thought
occurs due to seeing a nice house, one may compare that house with houses like that one has
seen before AND one’s “dream house” that one is hoping to build one day. Therefore, in the
“final version”, a citta is a very complex entity that reflects not only the “nature of the object
seen” but also one’s own likes/dislikes for it.
§ This last stage of the citta or Viññāṇa is the “composite awareness” for that particular event,
which also has one’s own likings, dislikings, etc for that particular event; see, “Citta, Mano,
Viññāṇa – Stages of a Thought“.
7. And we do not, and cannot, just perceive a single or even a few vinnanakkandho; rather what we
“feel” as a “thought” is the sum of many such vinnanakkandho, and we still call that a “citta” or a
“thought”; see, “What is a Thought?” and “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness)
Arises”.
§ We also alternatively call such sense experiences “citta“, “thoughts”, “consciousness”, and
“viññāṇa“.
§ Thus it is critical to understand that what we mean by viññāṇa in general is the sum total of
many cittas; in paṭicca samuppāda, at the “avijjā paccayā viññāṇa“, viññāṇa means this sum
total of many cittas or even more accurately the sum total of many of vinnanakkhandho.
8. Now I would like to point out a few important conventions:
§ It is important to remember that a thought can have many meanings even in English: WebLink:
WIKI: Thought
§ Normally “citta” is used to denote a thought, and “viññāṇa” is used to denote the
“awareness” associated with a thought. It is fine to do that most of the time, but if a
discussion gets technical one could come back to this post and refresh memory as to the
details.
§ And as you can imagine, such an “average of thoughts” may have many type of cognitions and
underlying “awarenesses”, and we will talk about the different types of viññāṇa in the next
post, “2. Viññāṇa (Consciousness) can be of Many Different Types and Forms”.
1. Viññāṇa is unique to sentient beings. Plants are alive but have no viññāṇa; they respond to the
environments but are not capable of “thinking”. Sentient beings are aware that they are alive and just
that basic awareness of “being alive” is not really a viññāṇa.
§ This purest level of viññāṇa (the awareness of being alive) is called the “citta” (pronounced
“chiththa”) stage.
§ A citta arises with 7 concomitant “mental factors” (cetasika, pronounced “chetasika”), and this
is described in “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises”. To emphasize, a
pure citta arises with those universal cetasika; a citta always has those 7 cetasika.
However, the citta of a sentient being gets “contaminated” by other cetasika as soon as it arises.
Within the lifetime of a citta (which is less than a billionth of a second), it progressively gets
contaminated by “good” or “bad” cetasika, and this happens in nine stages! This was discussed in the
previous post: “Thoughts (Citta), Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) –
Introduction“.
2. As discussed in “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises”, it is those additional
cetasika that provide “color” to a citta: if a set of “good cetasika” arise with the citta it becomes a
“good thought” or a “good viññāṇa”; if it is a set of “bad cetasika” , then the thought or the viññāṇa
is bad (those cetasika do not mix). Also, there are neutral thoughts or neutral viññāṇa that are neither
good nor bad.
§ Viññāṇa can be experienced in many different ways; since it is hard to come up with different
names for each case, they are all bundled together as viññāṇa. Words like citta, viññāṇa, mano,
as well as cakkhu viññāṇa, sota viññāṇa, etc and vipāka viññāṇa are used in different contexts
and that can be confusing to many regardless of whether their native language is English,
Chinese, or even Sinhala, which is the closest language to Pāli. But each term has its own
“subtle identity” and as we discuss more, those subtle differences will become clear.
3. Viññāṇa is often translated as “consciousness” but viññāṇa can be used in many different contexts
like “subconscious” or “layers of consciousness”.
§ The same problem is encountered by those who speak Sinhala, because there the word “sitha”
is used in many occasions to represent the Pāli words citta, mano, and viññāṇa. Similarly, in
Sinhala “yati sitha” is used to denote the subconscious.
§ This “subconscious” in English (as introduced by Sigmund Freud) or “yati sitha” in Sinhala is
not a separate citta (there can be only one citta at a time). But, each citta can have “layers of
consciousness”; the manasikara cetasika plays a big role here.
§ For example, at a given time we may have several “subconscious” viññāṇa: we may have
plans to buy a certain car, getting ready to go on a trip next week, in the process of
building a house, etc; all these are in the subconscious, and in each citta. If we see a car on
the road that looks like the car we are interested in, the viññāṇa alerts you to it, and you take a
good look at it.
§ As the Buddha advised bhikkhus, what really matters is to convey the meaning. Just like in the
case of paṭicca samuppāda or taṇhā, it is best to use the Pāli words and comprehend their
meanings; those key words convey deep meanings that may take several words or even
sentences in any other language to get the idea across.
Types of Viññāṇa associated with Kamma and the Sense Doors
Viññāṇa is complex and can be presented in various different types and forms. We will start by
looking at “two categories” of viññāṇa.
1. First, we can categorize them according to kamma (or saṅkhāra) associated with the viññāṇa:
Kamma viññāṇa, vipāka viññāṇa, and kiriya (or kriya) viññāṇa.
Let us describe in plain English what these terms mean.
§ We can put viññāṇa into three categories in relation to kamma: Those viññāṇa that arise while
doing a kamma (saṅkhāra) is called a kamma viññāṇa. For example, when one steals
something, one has an awareness of that; that is the “viññāṇa that one is stealing”.
§ Then there are those that arise as kamma vipāka, and thus we do not have much control over
them; they just happen to us and are called avyakata viññāṇa or vipāka viññāṇa. I like the term
vipāka viññāṇa than avyakata viññāṇa because then it is easy to differentiate those two kinds.
For example, when one is walking on the road and sees something valuable on the roadside;
that is a cakkhu viññāṇa (seeing something) and also a vipāka viññāṇa (due to a kamma
vipāka).
§ The third type in this category are called kiriya (kriya) viññāṇa, and they are not connected to
kamma. When we think, talk, or do something that does not involve kammically “good” or
“bad”, those are done with kiriya viññāṇa. For example, when we think about the cleaning
chores for the day, or ask someone what time it is, or walk to the kitchen to get a drink, all
those are done with kiriya viññāṇa.
2. When we are travelling by a vehicle and are looking out of a window, we see many different things
out there. But most of it we do not pay any attention, even though we are “aware” that we are seeing
things. Those are vipāka viññāṇa, they are “presented to us”, but most of them may not interest us.
§ Then all of a sudden we see something that “piques our interest”, say a nice house by the
roadside. Then we fix our attention on that and even may keep looking at until it moves out of
our range. That is a vipāka viññāṇa that triggered a “gathi” in us; it was of interest. And it
could put us in a position to acquire more kamma by initiating a kamma viññāṇa.
§ For example, if we really got interested in that house, we may start thinking about how nice
would it be if we could build and live in a house like that. Now we are making saṅkhāra (i.e.,
generating kamma) based on that “seeing event”. Thus such thoughts (or viññāṇa) that followed
the initial vipāka viññāṇa of “seeing the house” are kamma viññāṇa.
§ Our life experiences belong to basically one of those three categories.
3. All those viññāṇa may also be described in another totally different form; they can be
differentiated into six categories, this time based on the sense door: thus we have cakkhu viññāṇa
(vision consciousness), and sota (sound), ghāṇa (smell), jivhā (taste), kāya (touch), and mano (mind)
viññāṇa (consciousnesses).
§ In the previous example, the three types of viññāṇa were all initiated by cakkhu viññāṇa, a
“seeing event or consciousness”. At the kamma viññāṇa stage, they became mano viññāṇa,
because those thoughts about acquiring a house originated in our minds.
§ Then if another passenger touched us, we would turn and look at that person, because now we
had a kaya viññāṇa (which was also a vipāka viññāṇa).
§ If that touching turned out to be done by accident, we just let go of it, and it was just a neutral
event of seeing someone (kiriya viññāṇa).
§ However, if it was someone with whom we had a romantic relationship in the past, then we
may start generating kamma viññāṇa (mano viññāṇa). In the same way, if it was someone with
whom we have had a bad relationship, we may start generating another type of kamma viññāṇa
(mano viññāṇa).
§ Thus if you contemplate a bit on this, you can see that ALL our experiences can be put into
either of those two “divisions”, i.e., we can analyze them to be in vipāka viññāṇa, kamma
viññāṇa, and kiriya viññāṇa categories or the sense consciousness categories.
4. There are other types of viññāṇa that we will talk about later, but for now let us discuss something
that is really important to paṭicca samuppāda.
§ The paṭicca samuppāda cycle starts with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”, and “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa”. This viññāṇa is NOT a vipāka viññāṇa or a kiriya viññāṇa, but only a kamma
viññāṇa.
§ When we see something, hear something, etc., those are things that HAPPEN to us. Thus there
is no avijjā (or ignorance) initiating that consciousness. There is no paṭicca samuppāda cycle
associated with such a consciousness (viññāṇa).
§ However, if we now decide to act on it (say, take another look at it because we like it), then we
may be initiating a saṅkhāra (kamma) event: now this new event initiates a (pavutti) paṭicca
samuppāda cycle with “avijjā paccayā saṅkhāra”, which leads to, “saṅkhāra paccayā
viññāṇa”, i.e., this viññāṇa was initiated by a saṅkhāra; thus it is a kamma viññāṇa.
5. Usually, what happens in our lives is that we are bombarded with sense inputs via all six senses.
We tend to turn our attention to as many as we can because we are afraid that “we may miss out on
something”. This is the root cause for the lack of “peace” in our minds, because we are constantly
moving our attention among the six senses, going back and forth. If we have too many “likings” our
mind will be pulled in all different directions trying to follow all those sense inputs.
§ By avoiding busy environments (i.e., by going to a secluded place) we can reduce this effect.
But, we still cannot “turn off the sixth sense input”, i.e., the mind, unless we purify our
minds. This is the key to meditation. It is not possible to have a “peace of mind” if the mind is
burdened with greed, hate, and ignorance (wrong vision or micchā diṭṭhi).
6. Thus an Arahant can have a peaceful mind even when in the busiest place. A Sotāpanna can do
that to a certain extent too.
§ Even before any of the “magga phala” are attained, one can easily get to samādhi and then to
jhānas, by gradually getting rid of the defilements associated with “wrong vision” just by
learning Dhamma (mainly anicca, dukkha, anatta).
§ Then the number of different types of viññāṇa going through the mind will be reduced
(“Sounds like my neighbor’s car leaving, I wonder whether she is going to the mall?”, “I
wonder what (my enemy) is up to today?”, “I wish I could have a body like that!”, “How come
I don’t have a nice house like that?”; these are all types of viññāṇa that we burden our minds
with unnecessarily.
§ And it is important to realize that it is not easy to just turn those off; they WILL BE turned off
automatically when we purify our minds first by learning Dhamma (“What is the use of
thinking about unnecessary things? There are better things to think about that provide lasting
happiness”).
Next, “3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious“, ……………….
12.3.4 3. Viññāṇa is not a Thought and What is the Subconscious?
1. A thought (citta; pronounced “chiththa”) is on a specific thought object, say thinking about buying
a car or going for a walk. There is only one citta at a time, but each lasts less than a billionth of a
second and what we experience is vinnanakkhadha which encompases multiple cittas. One can
NEVER experience a single citta. Therefore, what we call a “thought” is the result of many of cittas
or more correctly the result of many citta vīthi, bundled up as vinnanakkhadha.
§ Each citta has many cetasika (mental factors) in it, including the all important saññā, phassa,
manasikara cetasika. Then there are “good” and “bad” cetasika in a citta that describe the
“mood” of the citta.
§ When someone is angry most cittas at that time will have the hate (paṭigha and/or dosa
cetasika. When the same person is feeding a hungry person his/her cittas at that time will have
the benevolence and/or loving kindness cetasikas. The good and bad cetasika do not mix, i.e.,
one either has a good thought or a bad thought. For discussion on cetasika, see, “Cetasika
(Mental Factors)“.
2. The manasikara and saññā cetasika is in each and every citta, and they carry all past memories,
habits (gathi) and cravings (āsavas) in them. The gathi and āsavas may not be displayed in each
citta; rather, they lie dormant, waiting for a “trigger” to come up. Gathi and āsavas are carried from
citta to citta (until they are removed), and new habits and cravings can be added at any time.
3. Viññāṇa is not a thought but it is in thoughts. Viññāṇa represents the overall experience of cittas,
and is largely described by the cetasika in those cittas. Of course no one experience a viññāṇa due to
a single citta; rather what one experiences is the average of millions or billions of cittas. A bunch or a
heap is called khandha in Pāli or Sinhala. Thus what we experience is a vinnanakkhandha, or the
averaged value over a bunch or a heap of cittas.
§ Viññāṇa is complex and multi-faceted. We may have viññāṇa of different types at the same
time. Even though we are directly aware of one type of viññāṇa at a given time, there may be
many types hiding beneath the surface. This is what Sigmund Freud called the “sub-conscious”.
4. A thought is what is occupying the mind at a given moment. When I am paying for my groceries,
my thoughts are focused on that transaction. But there can be many types of viññāṇa working “in the
background”. I may be building a house, studying for an exam, planning a trip, planning a birthday
party for my child, etc. and all those “viññāṇa” are working in the background even though I am not
thinking about any of them at the time I am paying for my groceries.
§ However, any of those, and even some things that I had not been thinking about for a long time
could be there further down in the “subconscious”. But there is no separate “subconscious” as
such. All these different types of viññāṇa are there in a single thought (citta), and there is only
one citta at a time; see, “What is a Thought?”. Then how is it possible for many types of
viññāṇa to be lurking in the background?
5. It is those mental factors (cetasika) that makes it all possible. Several key such mental factors play
key roles including memory (manasikara), contact (phassa), and perception(saññā). These key
“universal cetasika” are in all the citta and embody all our desires as well as everything that has
happened to us in them. Of course things happened recently are “closer to the top” compared to
something that had happened a long time ago. And it also depends on how significant a certain event
was. Some special events, even if they had happened a long time ago, are easier to remember.
§ Memories are fixed even though we may not remember all of them; all our memories are kept
intact as our nama gotta, in the mind plane; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory
Records (HSAM)“. Of course what we can recall is limited by many factors including the state
of the brain. As we get older the ability to recall gets weaker.
6. Viññāṇa is a sort of the “end result” of many memories as well as our gathi and āsavas.
§ The more one does something repeatedly, there starts a viññāṇa for that particular event or
behavior. For example, when one starts smoking, a viññāṇa starts building, and the more one
smokes, the stronger the viññāṇa gets. This is called “feeding the viññāṇa” by doing it again
and again. In other words, habits are formed via repeatedly feeding the viññāṇa for that habit.
§ When a certain viññāṇa is pleasing to the mind, that viññāṇa tries to get fed frequently. When
someone has the habit of smoking the viññāṇa for that tries to deviate his/her attention to
smoking at every possible opportunity. For example, if a smoker sees an advertisement for
smoking, that “triggers” the liking or the viññāṇa for smoking that was in the subconscious.
7. But it works the same way for a viññāṇa that got initiated with a dislike also. For example, if
someone did something really awful to you in the past, the hearing of his/her name will bring back
that viññāṇa. This is why we get “attached” to things we like as well for things we dislike, and is the
meaning of taṇhā (get bonded via greed or hate); see, “Taṇhā – How We Attach Via Greed, Hate, and
Ignorance“.
8. Not all viññāṇa keep accumulating in the background. Those weaker ones, especially if don’t get
fed, diminish and disappear. For example, suppose I had planned an overseas trip, and had been
making preparations for it. The more preparations I make and more thoughts I have of the trip, those
are “food for that viññāṇa”, and it grows. If I see a new article with that country’s name, I would
immediately read the article. But suppose, a major war breaks out in that country before my trip; then
I would cancel that trip right away. I will no longer be planning for the trip and my mind will “not be
interested” in it anymore. Since that viññāṇa for “visiting that country” is not going to get fed
anymore, it will be gone in a short time.
§ We don’t even need to actually physically do the activity to “feed the viññāṇa” or make a habit
stronger. There are studies that show that one could improve the game of basketball, for
example, by just visualize practising, and getting the ball in mentally. These are called “mano
sancetana”. Focusing the attention on a given task can be very powerful.
9. This is why chanda, citta, viriya, vimansa (satara iddhipada or the four bases of mental power) are
critical for achieving goals. When one forms a strong liking (chanda) for a goal, one starts thinking
often about it (citta), making effort (viriya), and constantly analyzing and trying to find related facts
(vimansa) about how to accomplish that goal; see, “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara
Iddhipada)“.
10. Our minds are very complex and powerful. And there are many different ways to analyze and
examine concepts that are closely related. This is why there are so many different ways Buddha
Dhamma can analyze a given situation and come to the same conclusion. It is a all self-consistent.
§ For example, suppose I thought about buying a silver car of model X several weeks ago; I have
been thinking about it reading reviews and so on. I may be driving on the road just focusing on
the road and driving with my thoughts and consciousness (viññāṇa) focused on driving. But
now if I see a silver-colored car of model X, then immediately that will trigger my viññāṇa
about “buying the car” and I may compare the silver-colored car with the car that I had in mind.
The mind likes to “feed the viññāṇa” that we have and the more it gets fed, it gets stronger. The
more I think about the car, the stronger my intentions get about buying one.
11. There could be several such viññāṇa “in the background” or “in the subconscious” at any given
time. For example, our viññāṇa keeps shifting as we keep moving from one task to another. But
underneath, there may be several viññāṇa waiting for an opportunity to come up to the conscious
level. Thus it can be “triggered” by a related event.
12. A built-up viññāṇa can form a habit; as the habit gets stronger, it can be carried over to the next
life, possibly in two ways: a really strong habit could lead to a “paṭisandhi viññāṇa” at the dying
moment and can lead to a corresponding “bhava”, and thus one could be born in the corresponding
“jāti”. For example, an extremely greedy person, may acquire a “peta bhava” at the dying moment
and be born as a “peta” or a hungry ghost.
§ On the other hand, if the same person had time left in the “human bhava” then that person will
be feeding the “pavutti viññāṇa” of greed, and will always be looking out to acquire more
“stuff” even at the expense of other people. Thus a “greedy viññāṇa” will grow as one keeps
feeding that viññāṇa. He/she will never be satisfied even if what has been acquired is more than
enough.
13. Thus viññāṇa is very complex; it is not just the “awareness”. It also has one’s “hopes and dreams”
as well as “likes, dislikes, and habits”. It is a complex combination of the 52 cetasikas; of course not
all cetasikas are involved in a given citta or in our thoughts.
It is a good idea to read the posts, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” and
“Viññāṇa – What It Really Means” first.
When one learns Abhidhamma one can see why both “self” and “no-self” concepts were rejected by
the Buddha. A “living being” is a momentarily changing entity. It is not possible to say “it does not
exist”, because it obviously does exist; it is just that it continuously evolves ON ITS OWN PATH
determined by “gathi” at each stage. Thus until parinibbana is attained, there is a “dynamic self”
which has its own identity or personality or “gathi” which also evolve.
§ It may be a good idea to read at least the introductory post on the manomaya kāya before
reading this post: “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya) - Introduction“.
1. A living being experiences the “world out there” in a series of very fast “snapshots”; it grasps the
“world” in a snapshot called a citta (pronounced “chiththa”) that lasts much less than a billionth of a
second. As soon as the mind sees that “snapshot”, it is gone. But the mind gives us an illusory sense
of a permanent “world”, by combining that “snapshot” with our past memories as well as our
hopes for the future. Let us see how this process is described in Abhidhamma.
§ The mind does this with the help of a cetasika (pronounced “chethasika”) in that citta called
manasikara. We will discuss this later, but I am just trying to get across the basic idea.
2. The name citta came from “chitra”, the name for a painting in Pāli or Sinhala. A pure citta has
only 7 mental factors (cetasika). Cetasika provide “colors for the picture”, so to speak.
§ But the 7 cetasika that are in each and every citta (universal cetasika or “sabba citta sadharana
cetasika”) may be considered “colorless”. A pure citta is like a blank sheet of paper on which
these “snapshots” are imprinted.
§ There are a set of 14 “bad cetasika” and a set of 25 “good cetasika”. For a rough visual we may
think of the “bad cetsika” as dark colors (black, brown, etc), and the “good cetasika” as
pleasant colors such as green or yellow. Then there are 6 other “occasionals” that are also
“colorless” and those can arise with either good or bad cetasika; see, “Cetasika (Mental
Factors)“.
§ Cetasika arise with a citta, decay with a citta, and take the same thought object (arammana) as
the citta. But a given citta has either good OR bad cetasika; they do not mix.
§ And a citta is of very short duration; it lasts much less than a billionth of a second; see, “What
is a Thought?” in the next post.
2. Therefore, we can visualize each “moment of awareness” of the outside world by the mind as
a very quick snapshot. As soon as it comes, it is gone.
Then how does our mind see the outside world as “permanent”? and also a given situation as ‘good”
or ‘bad”? When we look out we see mountains that have been there for thousands of years. People get
old, but they are around for years and years. Also, two people could look at the same thing and
perceive it differently (one as “good” and one “bad”).
§ This “trick” is done by two of the universal cetasika: manasikara and cetana.
§ As we discussed in other posts, a record of the “snapshot” that decays is permanently recorded
in the mental plane, and these records are called nama gotta; see, “Difference Between
Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (Sankata)“.
§ In the same way, our hopes and visions for the future are also in the mental plane. Of course the
past nama gotta are permanent while the imprints for the future keep changing. The manasikara
cetasika brings in memories from the past and hopes for the future into the current citta, thus a
“permanent like” view of the world is composed by the cetana cetasika, which is responsible
for “putting together a citta“.
§ Furthermore, in one person, “good” cetasika may arise due to a sense input, but if the “gathi” of
the other person is opposite, a set of “bad” cetasika may arise in the other person. The cetana
cetasika combines them to form a “good” or a “bad” awareness.
3. It is basically the same kind of process happens when we see, hear, taste, smell, touch, or think; let
us explain the concept for vision.
§ The basic sequence of events in capturing any “input” via the five physical senses was
described in “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya) - Introduction“.
§ If we keep looking at a picture on the wall, nothing changes because it is a static picture.
§ Now let us think about what happens when we look at a water fountain. Since there is wind and
other disturbances, we can see some changes, but the water fountain looks like a sort of a solid
object. But what we see is a composite of trillions of water particles rising and falling each
second. We do not “see” that but just the appearance of a “sort of solid object with a certain
shape” as formed by the water nozzles. Here the manasikara and cetana cetasika help the mind
put together a “composite” of what happened a few seconds ago and what is happening now to
give a more or less solid appearance.
§ Same thing happens in seeing a continuous “ring of fire” when one swirls a light in a circular
motion. At a given moment, the light is at a fixed position (a “data packet sent by the brain to
the mind shows the light at one point on the circle), but if we move the light fast enough, the
mind keep seeing the light moving to successive points on the circle and we see a “composite
picture” in the shape of a continuous ring of light.
4. Another example is a motion picture. When making a movie, what is actually done is to take many
many static pictures and then play them back at fast enough speed. If the playback speed is too slow,
we can see individual pictures, but above a certain “projection rate”, it looks like real motion. Here is
a video that illustrates this well:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Animation basics: The optical illusion of motion
5. When we see the outside world, what happens is very similar to the above. At the end of the video
it is stated that the “movie” we see is an illusion, and as the Buddha explained, that holds for real
life as well. In real life when we see someone coming towards us, what we actually see is a series of
“static pictures” or citta projected at a very fast rate in our minds, giving us the illusion of a “movie
like experience”.
§ Even though in the above video it is suggested that all the information from the “previous static
frames” were put together by the brain, that is true only to a certain extent.
§ The brain does put together the individual frames, but without actual “memories” it is not
possible to get the deep details about what is seen.
§ We not only “see” the video, but we also RECOGNIZE what is seen (we identify a given actor,
we can even remember previous movies with that actor, we KNOW all about the scenes in the
background, etc); to have all that information instantly available to the brain is not possible.
This is a point that needs a lot of thought.
§ What happens according to Abhidhamma, is that the brain periodically sends packets of
acquired data put together by the cortex in the brain to the hadaya vatthu, which is basically the
seat of the mind. There citta vīthi arise in accepting that information from the brain, and it is the
mind that does all the compiling (with the help of the manasikara and cetana cetasika) and that
is how we EXPERIENCE it.
§ I will go into more details later, but those are the key points.
6. We need to keep in mind that all animals have this capability too. A dog basically sees its
environment just like we do and instantly recognizes the objects in the picture. Even an ant does too,
even though its “world” is much more limited. Think about how a tiny ant can process all that
information that allows it to move in a reasonable fast pace in hunting for food; it knows its territory,
certain smells, and also remembers how to get back to its nest. All that information is NOT in that
tiny body of an ant. More things to think about!
7. In the above video, it is shown that the slowest projection rate where the brain seems to processing
data is about 20 frames per second; this correspond to a data packet of about 50 millisecond duration.
This is consistent with a recent findings from MIT that says the minimum time needed is about 20
milliseconds: WebLink: Detecting Meaning in Rapid Pictures-Potter-2014.
§ This is consistent with the Abhidhammic picture of the brain capturing segments of visual data
and transmitting that information to the hadaya vatthu, which is the “mind door”, via the
cakkhu pasada that is located on the manomaya kāya close to the hadaya vatthu.
§ Even though Abhidhamma does not mention how long the brain captures visual data for a
“seeing event” before sending to the hadaya vatthu, it does say that this information is now
converted by the brain to a format suitable for transmission to the hadaya vatthu, and is sent
there via a “ray system”, which is extremely fast. I assume that this encoded information is sent
at the speed of light and thus get to the hadaya vatthu (which is located on the manomaya kāya,
but is close to the heart) almost instantaneously.
8. Of course we not only see things, but we also hear, smell, taste, touch, and think other thoughts all
at the SAME TIME, it seems.
§ Even though the “sensing rate” is limited by the relatively slow processing speed of the brain
(which appear to be in the millisecond time scale according to current scientific studies
mentioned above), it is still more than fast enough for us to experience simultaneity in all sense
inputs.
9. Since the scientific studies on the “minimum duration of a detectable event” are still at early stages
(see #7 above), we may be able to put together a more precise sequence of events in the future. Yet
we have enough data to put together a qualitative picture of what happens.
§ This is an excellent example of how science can help us “fill in the blanks” of the overall
picture that the Buddha provided; of course it was impossible for him to convey the magnitudes
of these time scales 2500 years ago.
§ Once the Buddha was in a Simpasa forest near Kosambi, and he took a few leaves into his hand
and told the bhikkhus, “what I have taught you compared to what I know is like these few
leaves compared to the leaves in this forest; but what I have taught you is more than enough for
you to attain Nibbāna“.
§ Thus even though modern science can provide us with details about the “big picture” of the
Buddha, and we should be grateful to all those scientists for that knowledge, we should use that
knowledge wisely and should not get carried away in spending too much time on such details.
Next, “What is a Thought?“, ……………………
There are many confusing terms in Abhidhamma like citta and mano which have been differently
interpreted in different books. In order to clarify these concepts, I am writing a few posts in
“Dhamma Concepts” section under “Mind and Consciousness” starting with: “1. Thoughts (Citta),
Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) – Introduction“. I highly recommend reading
those, and especially, “3. Viññāṇa, Thoughts, and the Subconscious“.
1. In Buddha Dhamma, a thought or a citta (pronounced “chiththa”), is the briefest moment of
awareness experienced by a sentient being. In Abhidhamma it says that there are well over billion of
citta in the blink of eye.
§ Let us keep in mind that a citta is much smaller than a billionth of a second.
2. A pure citta only has seven cetasika (phassa, saññā, vedanā, cetana, ekaggata, jivitindriya, and
manasikara) in it; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“. Thus it is the purest form a “thought”, but it is
too brief for anyone to experience.
§ The first thing to note is that one will never be able to experience a single thought if we mean
by a thought to be a citta, even though we say, “I just had a thought”. The briefest awareness
that we actually experience is probably a fraction of a second; Scientists say it is about 10
milliseconds. But that 10 millisecond time is mostly spent by the brain in processing the sense
input; once that is done, a series of citta with 17 cittas flow in a very brief time (less than a
billionth of a second), and that is what is registered in the mind. We will discuss this later in
detail.
§ This series of citta with 17 cittas is called a citta vīthi (pronounced “chiththa veethi”); see
below.
3. Even a single citta has three phases: uppada (rising), thithi (reached peak but still changes), and
bhanga (dissolution). Thus a citta arises and fades away very fast.
§ Only a Buddha can see such details as I pointed out in the Introduction. Even people with
highest abhiññā powers (attained via jhānas) cannot even come close to seeing such details.
§ This is why Abhidhamma is a special section of Buddha Dhamma that needs to taken “as is”,
i.e., we just have to believe what the Buddha said. We cannot hope to verify these details by our
own experience (for example that there are a certain number of citta in a citta vīthi as discussed
below). Yet, Abhidhamma is very valuable in clarifying any issue down to the minute detail.
4. A pure citta with 7 cetasika does not last. Even though it starts as such a pure citta, within the
duration of the citta itself (less than a billionth of a second), it gets contaminated by either a set of bad
cetasika like lobha (greed), issa (envy) or a set of good cetasika like saddhā (faith) and sati
(mindfulness).
§ Before it starts decaying, it goes through NINE STAGES to become vinnakkandho (this is NOT
the aggregate as in the common usage of vinnakkhandha; rather, here the mind has coupled the
information in the previous stages of this citta with past viññāṇa and future viññāṇa that are in
the mind and has made a “composite”).
§ However, the convention is to call this whole process still a citta.
§ All this happens in less than a billionth of a second! This process keeps repeating in the citta to
follow and the process is cumulative, i.e., as more and more citta flow by, the awareness of the
event gets stronger, and we actually begin to feel it.
§ It may be a good idea to read about citta vīthi before proceeding: “Citta Vīthi – Processing of
Sense Inputs“.
5. Thus what we experience is the cumulative effect of numerous of citta vithis. That is why the
Buddha talked about kandhas (which means “heaps” in Pāli or Sinhala) as in “heaps” of feelings
(vedanākkhandha), perceptions (saññākkhandha), volitions (saṅkhārakkhandha), and consciousness
(viññāṇakkhandha); those are the “heaps” that we actually experience in a “thought”.
§ If citta fly by that fast, and captures six kind of possible “inputs” (through the five physical
senses and the mind itself), how do we “experience” seeing, hearing, etc “at the same time” but
still sort them out?
6. This is because the mind is the most powerful entity in this world. All five physical senses just
provide traces of inputs ( “memory imprints”), and billions of them arise and perish each second. The
mind keeps a record of all past events and MAKES A COMPOSITE SENSE EXPERIENCE
moment-by-moment.
§ For example when we hear someone say “apple”, even the letter “a” is comprehended by the
mind via billions of citta; then “p” is captured, and by that time “a” sound is gone from the ear.
§ We speak (and are able to understand) about 150 words/minute. The minimum “packet of
information” that the brain (not the mind) can process is estimated to be about a hundredth
of a second (10 milliseconds) by the scientists. This comes about 1-2 letters in such a “packet”.
§ When it has captured the whole word, “apple”, the mind automatically matches that with all the
past memories and instantly produces an awareness or a mental picture of an apple; past
memories as well as hopes for future are recalled by the mansikāra cetasika and the citta is
“put together” by the cetanā cetasika.
7. The mind can do this because it can process billions of citta vīthi per second!
§ The “bottleneck” is the brain, which takes a relatively long time to process a “packet” of
information that comes in.
§ Therefore, the mind falls back to the bhavaṅga state in between the comprehending of
information packets. For example, right after receiving the letter “a”, it falls to the bhavaṅga
state and waits until the next packet with “p” comes.
8. Furthermore, the mind is capable of processing multiple inputs (received via the five senses) that
are coming in mixed up.
§ For example, after hearing the letter “a” that comes through the ears, the mind may get a
“packet” with information about the smell of the apple. But the mind is capable of “sorting out”
these different inputs.
§ It is also able to carry out its own mental processes (thinking and coming to conclusions about
what is perceived through the five senses by comparing it with past memories) such a fast
speed, that it appears to be done in “real time”.
§ There is nothing that is faster than the mind in this world; see, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution
of a Thought (Citta)“. Also, see the previous post, “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa
(Consciousness) Arises“.
9. Now the mind “knows” what that person was referring to, and has a mental image of an apple.
§ If someone hears the word, “lemon”, one could even feel the sour taste of lemon; the mind
brings it back from the past memories.
§ Even if we see just the outline of a familiar person at a distance, the mind “fills in the blanks”
and flashes an image of that person in your mind so you know who it is.
10. One sensory “event” does not happen in one citta. A sensory event from one of the five physical
senses is captured by a single citta (say, cakkhudvāra citta for a seeing event), but that information is
processed by a string of cittas with 17 cittas in it; this “string of cittas” is called a citta vīthi
(pronounced “chiththa veethi”). A citta vīthi for ‘seeing” is referred to as a citta vīthi at the “eye
door” or the eye, one for “hearing” occurs at the “ear door” or the ear, etc.
§ When one citta vīthi provides a sensory input, that information is then processed by three citta
vithis that involves only the mind; this citta vīthi “at the mind door” is variable; it has around
12 citta normally. But in a jhāna samapatti, which is solely a mind door process, there can be a
very large number of citta without interruption.
§ Thus there are two types of citta vīthi involved in processing a sensory input: a long one with
17 citta to CAPTURE an input from one of the five physical senses (pancadvara) AND three
manodvara citta vīthi (at the mind door) with about 12 citta. Both types are thus involved in
cognition (awareness) processes; there are other processes by the mind that we will discuss
later.
§ Only one citta vīthi runs at a given time; they do not overlap.
11. Thus it is mind boggling if we try to imagine the frantic pace the mind works at. At this point, it
may be a good idea to look at an analogy to simplify things a bit.
§ A movie is generated by a series of static pictures. When a movie is projected on a screen, static
pictures are projected at a rate of about 30 frames a second, and we see the movie as a
continuous progression of events; if the projection rate is low, we can see it frame by frame or
as “packets of information” separately. When we watch the movie, we do not perceive those
static pictures or “packets of information”, but we perceive a continuous progression without
any gaps.
§ This was described in #4 of the previous post, “Citta and Cetasika – How Vinnana
(Consciousness) Arises“.
12. In the same way, when we perceive that our mind is hearing a word, but in reality that word is the
result of many citta vīthi originated at the ear door; and the scene that appears simultaneous is the
composite of many citta vīthi coming through the eye door and none of it happens “at the same time”.
§ Just like the movie projected at 30-50 frames a second, citta vīthi are generated at many frames
a second. (I had previously mentioned billions of cittas and that is not correct; the flow of citta
vīthi is subsided by the processing time of about 10 milliseconds needed by the brain to process
each each sense input). Thus we feel that we are watching, hearing, tasting, smelling, touching,
and thinking all at the same time.
§ To repeat for emphasis: Our minds processes probably less than 100 citta vīthi per second.
However, each citta vīthi with 17 citta (for five sense inputs) or about 10 citta (for mind inputs)
and each of those citta vīthi take less than billionth of a second. Even though it takes the brain
to process a sense input about 20 milliseconds or so, that information is grasped by the mind in
less than a billionth of a second.
§ While the brain is processing a sense input, the mind falls back to the bhavaṅga state.
13. Just like a movie reel, there is actually a tape (not a physical one) that is recorded in the “mind
plane”; this is the origin of the “nama gotta” discussed in, “Difference Between Dhamma and
Saṅkhāra“. That tape is there forever, and allows one with abhiññā powers to look back to any time
in the past; see, “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)“.
§ Therefore in order to verify rebirth or to look at really old memories, all one needs to do is to
develop abhiññā powers! And there are people, including my teacher Theros, who can do this
today.
14. A citta evolves into viññāna and that is actually what we experience; see, “Amazingly Fast Time
Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” and “Viññāna – Consciousness Together With Future Expectations“.
§ There is only one citta at a time. But there is memory, as we just discussed. And that memory is
normally hidden because the mind is covered up by the defilements, and when one develops
abhiññā powers what one is really doing is to clean up the mind so everything becomes clear.
§ One who develops abhiññā powers through anariya jhānas just let the gunk settle at bottom
and see just the upper layers; but one who has developed abhiññā powers through Ariya jhānas
is doing that by “cleaning up” the gunk so a much more penetration to deeper past is possible;
see, “Solution to a Wandering Mind – Abandon Everything?“.
15. Thus any of individual sense experiences is VERY BRIEF (the duration of a citta vīthi). It is the
mind that puts everything together and presents us with a “movie like” experience. This is what
the Buddha meant when he told Bahiya Daruchiriya: “Ditte ditta manatan, sute suta mantan, mute
muta manatan, vinnate viññāṇa mantan” or “seeing is just a trace of seeing, hearing is just a trace of
hearing, enjoying is just a trace of enjoyment, experiencing is just a trace of experience”.
§ It is the mind (specifically the viññāṇa kandha or the aggregate of consciousness) that put
everything together and present it as a smooth movie-like experience.
§ Here, ditta, suta muta, vinnata mean “seeing, hearing, enjoying (with smell, taste, and touch),
and consciousness respectively; “mantan” means “a mātra” in Sinhala or “a trace” in English.
Thus “seeing” is just trace of a visual event lasting only a billionth of a second, then it passes
away and a new one comes in; there is nothing substantial in it. Mind makes everything appear
solid, permanent, and stable. This is the deeper meaning of that verse.
16. If all this appear too technical, do not worry about it. It took me a long time to figure it out and I
think I got the final details worked out recently by also combining information from recent scientific
studies. The Buddha could not use today’s technical terms, but what he said in summary form is
completely compatible with science. But science is still way behind in terms of the bigger picture.
Next, “What is in a Thought? Why Gathi are so Important?“, ………….
12.4.3 What is in a Thought? Why Gathi are so Important?
There are many confusing terms in Abhidhamma like citta and mano which have been differently
interpreted in different books. In order to clarify these concepts, I am writing a few posts in
“Dhamma Concepts” section under “Mind and Consciousness” starting with: “Thoughts (Citta),
Consciousness (Viññāṇa), and Mind (Hadaya Vatthu) – Introduction“.
1. In the previous post we saw that a thought (citta; pronounced “chittha”) lasts much less than a
billionth of a second. The more surprising part is that each citta has structure! Each citta “contains”
multiple cetasika (mental factors); actually it is more accurate to say that each citta rises with a
number of cetasika and they all perish together within a billionth of a second, only to be followed by
another citta.
§ Of course, here we are only talking about a citta in a citta vīthi that is involved in “sensing the
outside world” via the six senses. Such a citta vīthi has either 17 citta (for those sensing events
involving the five physical senses) or about 10 citta in citta vithis that involve only the mind. In
between those, the mind is at the “bhavaṅga” state, which is commonly described as “bhavaṅga
citta“.
§ The citta (including those “bhavaṅga citta“) flow CONTINUOUSLY within a life and then
start a new stream at the next life; there is no break in between the two lives.
§ The stream of thoughts we have, has been running non-stop since the beginning-less time; see,
“What Reincarnates? – The Concept of a Lifestream”.
§ However, we do not “feel” all the citta. There are “gaps” in between citta vīthi mainly with the
mind in the Bhavaṅga state.
2. The cetasika (mental factors) provide different qualities to each citta. A citta is moral (kusala),
immoral (akusala), or neutral (kiriya) depending on the what type cetasika rise with it.
A complete description of 52 cetasika are given in, “Cetasika (mental factors)”. A brief summary:
§ There are 7 universal cetasika that rise with ANY citta.
§ Six others CAN appear in any citta, i.e., only some of them may be in a given citta.
§ There are 14 asobhana cetasika (non-beautiful mental factors) that appear only in akusala citta.
§ There are 25 sobhana cetasika (beautiful mental factors), and 19 of them appear in each and
every kusala citta, and thus are called beautiful universals.
3. Let us first discuss the 7 universal cetasika. These arise with ANY citta, and in fact a citta with just
these is called a “pabhasvara citta”, because it is the “purest form” of a citta. It gets contaminated to
become a “viññāṇa citta” as it develops in time within a billionth of a second! We would not get into
those details for a while.
§ What we actually experience are “viññāṇa citta“, as viññāṇa khanda (aggregate of viññāṇa
or a “heap of viññāṇa”).
The 7 universal cetasika that arise with any citta are:
§ Phassa (contact), saññā (perception), vedanā (feeling), cetana (intention), ekaggata (one-
pointedness), jivitindriya (life faculty), and manasikara (memory).
4. The phassa (contact) cetasika is what makes contact with the “object of the citta” whether it is
sense input from one of the five physical senses or a concept that makes contact with the mind.
§ In paṭicca samuppāda, this is the phassa in the step “saḷāyatana paccayā phasso”. Of course
saḷāyatana are the six senses. Thus it is phassa that makes possible for the mind to make
contacts with the world.
§ Saññā (perception) identifies the object by working with manasikara (memory), and vedanā
(feeling) arises.
§ Depending on the object, one will generate good, bad, or neutral feeling, and also different
types of cetasika (greed, shame, compassion, etc) can arise; cetana (intention) puts it all
together and “prepares” the citta. Based on the types of cetasika in the citta, it could be a good
or bad thought. This is why cetana can be good or bad, and the Buddha said “cetana is
kamma“.
§ Ekaggata is the ability to keep the mind on one object. Jivitindriya maintains life in the current
life (keeps the body alive) until death. And manasikara is the all-important memory.
Manasikara has ALL memories (or nama gotta) from the beginning-less time; see, “Difference
between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra” for a discussion on nama gotta.
§ This is why the present citta is the precursor to the next citta and that next citta is NOT totally
different from the previous citta; manasikara, for example, just keeps building up on the past
citta. “Cause and effect” is at work from citta to citta, maintaining the “personality” or “gathi”
of the given lifestream. This is why the Buddha rejected the notion of a “no-self”, as well as a
“self”.
§ Yet it is important to realize that “gathi” can change even in a citta, for example one attains the
Arahanthood with a single citta (of course with billions of citta vīthi making gradual progress
towards it).
5. So, we can see the basic working of a citta with these 7 universals; they carry out the most
fundamental and vital functions of recognizing the object, matching it with old memories and
figuring out what it is, and also sukha, dukha, or neutral feeling arise because of that recognition.
§ Yet all that does not happen in a single citta. When an “input” comes through one of the six
senses, it is captured by a citta vīthi containing 17 citta for a physical sense input and about 10
citta for a mind input as we discussed in the previous post. Then that “captured event” is
discerned and analyzed by three follow-up “manodvara citta vīthi”, i.e., by the mind.
§ Even then we actually experience only the “net result” of millions of such citta vīthi, as we
mentioned in the previous post. But due to the extreme rapidity of these processes, we feel like
we are using all six in real time. We are not. The mind is always analyzing a set of events that
have already gone by, thus “ditte ditta mantan, ………”. What we experience NOW is what has
already transpired.
6. But invariably other cetasika (other than the 7 universal) arise as the citta develops in time, and the
citta becomes kusala citta, akusala citta or a kiriya (neutral) citta depending on the cetasika that arise
with the citta.
§ Sobhana cetasika arise with kusala citta and asobhana cetasika arise with akusala citta.
§ These cetasika types do not mix, i.e., no sobhana cetasika arise with an akusala citta etc.
7. Now the question arises: If citta arise and fall and go by so rapidly, how do we willfully stop
akusala citta from arising? Especially when exposed to a tempting external object like a eye-catching
figure.
And the answer lies in a very simple concept that I have discussed in many posts:
§ This is where one’s character qualities (gathi) and āsava come into play. One automatically
responds with the “set of values” one has.
§ By changing one’s habits one can change one’s character (gathi)and eventually change one’s
deep-rooted cravings (āsavas). Even though the answer is simple, it takes a long time to get rid
of bad habits and cultivate good habits, at least initially.
§ The with time, as that gathi loses its power, one will be less and less tempted when subjected to
the same sense input, say an attractive figure, or a hateful thought.
8. The key to reduce such bad gathi is to forcefully suppress that bad thought as soon as you become
aware of it. Even though a bad thought arises automatically, one becomes aware of it after a few
seconds.
§ As soon as you become aware of a bad thought you should think about the bad consequences
and forcefully stop that thought stream. Just start thinking about something good or start doing
something that needs your full attention.
§ When you keep doing this for a while, that tendency will slowly reduce, i.e., that bad gathi will
lose its power.
§ For example, if one needs to quit smoking, as soon as one starts lighting a cigarette one should
think about the bad consequences of smoking and throw it away. Keep some mints handy and
pop one in your mouth. Finding a “replacement activity” always helps to break a bad habit.
§ If it is hateful thought, one could stop it and start thinking about something good. A hateful
thought may be replaced by recalling a picture of the Buddha, for example. Always have a
“replacement” ready.
§ One needs to keep doing this faithfully in order to make the old habit weak.
9. When one gets rid of bad habits and cultivates good habits, the neural connections in one’s
brain get rewired. The brain changes gradually and that is how the thoughts change. This is the
easy answer using the modern science.
§ But there is a deeper analysis. Not only the physical brain changes, but also our manomaya
kāya is transformed. Eventually that is what controls the brain; see, the couple of posts on
manomaya kāya and also, “Neuroscience says there is no Free Will? – That is a
Misinterpretation!” for details.
§ This idea of gradually changing one’s habits holds the KEY in making progress on the Path or
even on achieving mundane goals, as I have discussed in other posts.
10. Therefore, initially one responds with one’s current set of values or gathi. But after a few
moments, one CAN think about the consequences and make corrections to the initial automatic
reaction.
§ This is further explained in terms of the instant reaction coming from the limbic system in the
brain and the “reasoned out” corrective action coming from the neo-cortex or “the thinking
brain”; see, “Truine Brain – How the Mind Rewires the Brain via Meditation/Habits“.
§ And that is how we slowly change our gathi, by willfully making corrections to the initial
“auto-response”. This is what makes us different from animals. Animals do not have this
ability, at least not to our level.
§ The more you “catch” such “inappropriate auto-responses” and stop them, the more
effectively we can get rid of bad habits, cultivate good habits and change our gathi
(character) in the right direction. This is “ānāpāna sati”, i.e., one keeps good thoughts and
gets rid of bad thoughts willfully; see, “What is Ānāpāna?” in the Meditation section.
11. As mentioned above, cetasika present in a given citta determine the quality and/or the function of
the citta.
§ An immoral (akusala) citta have one or more immoral roots; avijjā (delusion cetasika) is in any
immoral citta.
§ A moral (kusala) citta will always have non-greed and non-hate cetasika. Wisdom (paññā)
cetasika rises only in citta with all three roots (tihetuka citta).
§ We have come across many of the cetasika in the posts on various topics: the five hindrances
are of course included in the 14 asobhana cetasika.
§ The four bases of mental power (satara iddhipada) are four of the sobhana cetasika, i.e.,
chanda, citta, viriya, vimansa. Here citta means “thinking about the goal” and thus is sammā
sankappa when fully cultivated. Vimansa is another name for paññā and becomes sammā diṭṭhi
when fully cultivated; see, “37 Factors of Enlightenment“.
§ Some of the factors in the Noble Eightfold Path are directly in the set of sobhana cetasika, for
example, sammā vaca, sammā kammanta, and sammā ajiva. Other cetasika like sati and paññā,
when cultivated become sammā sati and sammā diṭṭhi.
§ Similarly, ekaggata in the universal cetasika set becomes sammā samādhi, and viriya and
vitakka in the set of particulars become sammā vayama and sammā sankappa when cultivated.
12. As we noted, we can control a bad series of thoughts like planning a robbery or even making a
quick plan to steal an item from a store. There is enough time to think about the consequences of such
a bad action and deliberately stop such thoughts. But one needs to be in a fairly stable “state-of-
mind” to be able to do that. When the mind is agitated, the mind cannot see “right from
wrong”. The five hindrances are covering the mind.
§ Sometimes people commit horrendous crimes in the spur-of-the-moment. One can get into a
rage and shoot someone with a gun that is close by. How do we stop such quick reactions?
By being mindful to control that bad gathi, which is the tendency to get mad at the slightest
provocation. See #10 above.
§ When one keeps reducing one’s “bad gathi“, those really dangerous gathi — which could lead
to rebirth in the apāyas — will be permanently eliminated when one becomes a Sotāpanna.
When that is achieved, that mindset is maintained even in future lives. As we saw, a paṭisandhi
citta in the new life arise based on the cuti citta of the past life, so it has all the “gathi” from the
past life. Changing to a “gathi” of a Sotāpanna is called a change in lineage (gotrabhu); one
becomes an Ariya or a Noble person forever.
Next, “Why Do People Enjoy Immoral Deeds? – Diṭṭhi Is Key“, ……….
12.4.4 Cetasika – Connection to Gathi
Abhidhamma can be a very useful tool to clarify various concepts given in the suttas, especially if
different people try to interpret suttas in different ways; see, “Sutta – Introduction“. Furthermore, it
provides minute details on how the human mind gets the physical body (which is just a “shell” made
out of inert matter) to do any and all bodily tasks.
1. In the introductory posts in Abhidhamma we saw that there are seven universal cetasika (mental
factors) that arise with each and every citta (loosely translated as a thought); citta is pronounced
“chiththā” and cetasika pronounced “chethasikā”.
§ Those 7 universal cetasika are essential in forming any kind of citta, whether it is an immoral
(akusala) citta, a moral (kusala) citta or a citta that does not do any kamma. For the moment,
let us concentrate on the 54 types of cittas in the kāma loka.
§ The rest of the cetasika provide “character” to cittas. Whether a given citta is good or bad
depends on whether a “good” or “bad” set of cetasika arise with it; see, “Citta and Cetasika –
How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“. They are listed in the post “Cetasika (Mental Factors)”
and you may want to print it out for reference when reading this post. There is no need to
memorize them. With time, one may even know them by heart.
§ Out of the 54 cittas in the kāma loka, there are 12 akusala citta and 8 kusala citta. Other 34 are
vipāka citta and kriya citta that do not generate kammic power.
§ It may sound confusing all these terms, but you will get used to them! Try to get the essence.
2. Then there are six cetasika called particulars (also called occasionals) or pakinnaka that MAY
appear in any type of citta. Therefore they do not determine the PURPOSE of the citta, but they
HELP with any type of purpose that was intended.
§ For example, viriya cetasika could be in a kusala citta and it can also be in an akusala citta. In
either case, the viriya cetasika will HELP intensify the effort with that citta.
3. Out of a total of 52 cetasika, the other 39 (= 52-7-6) cetasika determine whether a given citta will
be an akusala citta or a kusala citta.
§ There are 14 cetasika (called asobhana or immoral or bad cetasika) that could be present in an
akusala citta; out of those, 4 ALWAYS are present in any akusala citta; those 4 are asobhana
universals.
§ The other 25 cetasika (called sobhana or moral or good cetasika) can be present only in kusala
citta, and 19 of those are ALWAYS in any given kusala citta; those 19 are sobhana universals.
§ Therefore, 11 cetasika (7 universal plus 4 universal immoral) arise with each and every akusala
citta. There may be other immoral and particular cetasika as well.
§ There are 26 cetasika (7 universal plus 19 universal moral) arise with each and every kusala
citta. Thus there are only 6 more moral cetasika that that do not arise with each and every
kusala citta.
4. Therefore, it is those sobhana and asobhana cetasika that determine the kammic nature of a citta.
If we want to get rid of all akusala citta, what we need to do is to remove the 14 asobhana cetasika
from our minds (they come up automatically with our gathi and āsavas).
§ In other words, our sansāric habits (“gathi“) and cravings (“āsavas“) are embedded in
those 14 asobhana (and sobhana) cetasika, such as lobha and dosa. For example, one may
have dominant “lobha gathi” (excess greed) or “dosa gathi” (strong hate); but normally, we
have a mixture of many different inter-mixed gathi.
§ In the same way, cultivating good “gathi” and “cravings” (basically for moral deeds) leads to
“good cetasika“.
§ As we follow the Noble Eightfold Path, those 14 asobhana cetasika are reduced. When
reaching the Sotāpanna stage, the two asobhana cetasika of diṭṭhi and vicikicchā are
REMOVED, and all others are reduced to some extent. In particular, lobha is reduced to rāga
level and dosa is reduced to paṭigha. This why a Sotāpanna will never be born in the apāyas.
§ Raga has 3 components: kāma rāga, rūpa rāga, and arūpa rāga, corresponding to attachment
to the kāma loka, rūpa loka, and arūpa loka respectively. At the Sakadāgāmī stage, kāma rāga
and paṭigha are REDUCED to the level that one will never be born at or below the human
realm.
§ At the Anāgāmī stage, both those ( kāma rāga and paṭigha) are REMOVED and thus all bonds
to the kāma loka are broken and one will never be born again in the kāma loka. Of course other
remaining asobhana cetasika are reduced too.
§ All asobhana cetasika are removed at the Arahant stage.
5. Thus we can see that this is yet another way of looking at what is involved in attaining Nibbāna.
All these different ways of explaining are fully inter-consistent. There are more, but I am providing
links to a few below.
Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?
The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas
Key to Sotāpanna Stage – Diṭṭhi and Vicikicchā
What Are Rūpa? (Relation to Nibbāna)
6. We can easily see why four immoral universal cetasika arise with each and every akusala citta.
These four are: moha (delusion or moral blindness), ahirika (shamelessness of wrong), anottappa
(fearlessness of wrong), and uddhacca (restlessness).
§ We do not realize, but when we get greedy or hateful enough, we can become morally blind.
One loses any sense of decency just for a short time, but that is enough to commit an immoral
act.
§ Then we lose the fear of doing wrong and the shame of doing wrong because at that instant our
minds are covered (it takes only a fraction of second to generate a thought and sometimes even
to act on it if the javana is strong enough). This inevitably leads to a restless mind (uddhacca)
too.
7. Now let us discuss the 7 pairs in the universal moral cetasika list, starting with the pair of
kayapassaddhi (tranquility of mental body, which in turn lead to tranquility of the physical body
itself); cittapassaddhi (tranquility of consciousness). All these 7 pairs are states of mind and body
that correspond to some “cooling down”. When one is doing a kusala kamma, the body and mind
both relax and “cool down”. This is the first glimpse of Nibbāna as one is already in the mundane
eightfold path.
§ This is why the Buddha said that the state of the mind does affect the state of the body. When
one starts on the lokuttara eightfold path, these cetasika all get stronger,one starts feeling the
“nirāmisa sukha“, and thus one becomes motivated to follow the Path.
§ But it is important to emphasize (as I have stated many times), things COULD get worse before
getting better. When one is depriving the mind of things that is has gotten used to, it does
not like that. Until it clearly sees the benefits of staying in the Path, it may try to pull one
strongly in the “wrong direction”. One needs to be persistent, and this is where the satara
iddhipada (chanda, citta, viriya, vimansa) need to be cultivated aggressively.
8. It is important to realize that the 19 universal moral cetasika can arise in ANYONE regardless of
one’s religion or any other “label”. When doing a good deed (or speech or thought), these moral
cetasika ALWAYS arise. They can arise when one is on the mundane eightfold Path (nothing to do
with a religion per se); see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ Also note that hiri (shame of immoral deeds) and ottappa (fear of the consequences of immoral
deeds) are the two that are opposed to the immoral ones of ahiri and anattappa. This means
regardless of the religion, one has been able to sort out right from wrong (moral from immoral)
in that instance.
§ Then there is saddhā (faith) and sati (mindfulness), both of which grow even more after
embarking on the Path. Here, saddhā is not the faith in Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha, but the faith
that such a moral act will bring about good outcomes.
§ And sati is NOT Sammā Sati, but just the mindfulness of being involved in a moral act.
However, once one gets on the lokuttara eightfold Path, it can become Sammā Sati.
§ The other two familiar ones are alobha and adosa cetasika; they are of course opposite to the
immoral ones of lobha and dosa. Alobha is not mere absence of lobha, but also embodies
generosity. Adosa is not mere absence of dosa, but embodies compassion.
§ Then there is tatramajjhattata (neutrality of mind; “majjhatta” means “in the middle”). This is
not upekkha, which is one of the saptha bojjanga; see, “37 Factors of Enlightenment“.
§ Thus far, we have discussed the 19 universal moral cetasika in #7 and #8. Now let us discuss
the 6 moral cetasika that arise only with some kusala citta.
9. It is easier to list those 6 moral cetasika that do not necessarily arise with each kusala citta. These
are the ones that NEED TO BE CULTIVATED with true comprehension of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ They are: Sammā Vaca (speech that is conducive to eliminate “san“), Sammā Kammanta
(actions that are conducive to eliminate “san“) Sammā Ajiva (life style that is conducive to
eliminate “san“), karuna (“Ariya” compassion), mudita (“Ariya” appreciative joy), and paññā
(wisdom) which is the same as Sammā Diṭṭhi.
§ Of course those are developed to some extent when someone lives one’s life morally, but they
will NEVER grow to higher stages until one understands anicca, dukkha, anatta at least to
some extent.
§ This is why sammā vaca is not just “good speech” or sammā kammanta is not just “good
deeds”. Sammā (“san” + “ma“) means “with the intention of removing ‘san‘”, i.e., done with an
understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta; see, “Why is Correct Interpretation of Anicca,
Dukkha, Anatta so Important?“.
10. However, amoha does not mean wisdom (paññā)! Amoha is not a cetasika, but is a root cause.
It is in all kusala citta in the sense that the immoral cetasika of moha is not present at that
moment, i.e., the mind is not “covered”.
§ Some people interpret amoha to be paññā; not so. Paññā (wisdom) or lokuttara Sammā Diṭṭhi
needs to be cultivated via comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta, and starts when one is on the
Sotāpanna magga; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and “What is Unique in Buddha
Dhamma“.
§ The more paññā one has, it is more likely that one would be generating amoha thoughts more
frequently!
§ No matter how intelligent one is, one cannot start cultivating paññā until one hears about the
correct interpretations of anicca, dukkha, anatta.
11. Now let us briefly revisit the 6 particulars (also called occasionals) or pakinnaka that we
mentioned in #2 above. They are: vitakka (focused application), vicara (sustained application);
adhimokkha (dominate), viriya (effort), pīti (joy); chanda (desire).
§ As we can readily see, these six can be in kusala or akusala citta and make them stronger.
§ This is why it is said that “dhammo ha ve rakkati dhammacari” or “dhamma will guide one in
the direction of dhamma that one follows”, applies to both moral AND immoral paths.
§ Vitakka (focused application of thoughts), when cultivated in the lokuttara Path, can become
sammā sankappa. Similarly, viriya (effort) can become sammā vayama.
12. Therefore, abhidhamma helps us understand the connection between cetasika and gathi, and how
“bad gathi” are removed at each stage of Nibbāna (see #4 above). We can also see from the above
discussion how 8 of the cetasika (related to “good gathi“) turn to components of the Noble Eightfold
Path when one starts on the Sotāpanna magga. Actually, we discussed only 7 above (they are
highlighted in bold red). The eighth one is the universal cetasika, ekaggata (one-pointedness) that can
become sammā samādhi.
§ However, depending on one’s behavior and understanding, all these eight could be developed
in the direction of the immoral (micchā eightfold path), mundane moral (lokiya eightfold path),
or the lokuttara Noble eightfold Path; see, “Three Kinds of Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths, and
Samādhi“.
§ Looking from different perspectives there could be many types of samādhi. For a discussion on
three other types of samādhi, see, “What is Samādhi? – Three Kinds of Mindfulness“.
13. This world is very complex. And the Buddha has analyzed it in many different ways. But they are
all self-consistent. If one can get some traction, there is no other pleasure better than the pleasure of
finding out about this world, pleasure of Dhamma.
§ It is said that, “sabba rathin Dhamma rathin jinathi“. Here “rathi” means “taste”, thus “from all
tastes in the world, taste of Dhamma wins”. The “taste of Dhamma” optimizes for an Anāgāmī.
§ However, when one attains the Arahanthood, it is said that one has lost all interest in all
worldly things, including that of Dhamma. That is why the Buddha said, “A boat should be
used just until one crosses a river; one should not carry it after crossing the river. Just like that
even my Dhamma needs to be used only to find the true nature of this world, and then it should
be discarded too”.
§ When one reaches the Anāgāmī stage, one would have lost all cravings for worldly pleasures
(in kāma loka), but one really likes to learn Dhamma at every opportunity. And there is no end
to it. This is why the Buddha gave the above advice, especially for the Anāgāmīs.
12.4.5 Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power
1. The power of the human mind has been discussed in several posts starting with “Power of the
Human Mind – Introduction”. There different kinds of citta and the powerful ones are called javana
citta (“javana” means an arrow in flight; it can be highly potent).
§ Such javana citta are responsible for abhisaṅkhāra: saṅkhāra that are potent and will lead to
(good or bad) consequences. Punnabhisankhara are the meritorious abhisaṅkhāra that will lead
to good consequences and apuññābhisaṅkhāra are the immoral abhisaṅkhāra that lead to bad
consequences.
§ Javana citta arise in both pancadvara citta vīthi and manodvara citta vīthi when the object is
very clear and strong; see, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs“.
2. Out of the 54 types of citta in the kāma loka (the 11 lower realms including the human realm), 29
are javana citta: 12 akusala citta, 8 mahā kusala citta, 8 mahā kiriya citta, and the functional smile-
producing citta (the latter 9 cittas only for an Arahant).
§ A kusala citta generates power for rebirth in human or above realms, AND also helps with
progressing towards Nibbāna or “cooling down”.
§ When one does an akusala citta, one is generating power to form kammic energy for rebirth in
the apāyas (lowest 4 realms).
§ Thus for normal human beings, there are only 20 cittas out of 54 that are javana citta: 12 for
doing bad deeds and 8 for good deeds (here deeds means thought, speech or bodily action).
§ To re-emphasize, vipāka citta vīthi do not have javana citta. Thus in the detection of any sense
input (seeing, hearing, etc), javana citta are absent; they are called prittarammana (slight) and
atiparittarammana (very slight) citta vīthi. However, based on these vipāka citta vīthi, we
MAY instantly initiate potent atimahattarammana (very great) and mahattarammana (great)
citta vīthi that will have javana citta in them.
§ Thus if we start making plans (buy that picture, re-listen to that song, etc) based on those
visuals, sounds, etc, then those subsequent citta vīthi will have javana citta in them, and lead to
abhisaṅkhāra (GENERATE kammic power).
3. Not all akusala javana citta have same power. Also see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different
Kamma” and “12. Key Factors to be Considered when “Meditating” for the Sotāpanna Stage“.
§ Out of the 8 greed-rooted citta, those 4 done with pleasure (somanassa-sahagata) are stronger
than the done with neutral feeling.
§ Next those associated with micchā diṭṭhi (or diṭṭhi-sahagata) are more powerful than the 4
generated without wrong vision (or diṭṭhi-vippayutta).
§ Finally, those greed-rooted citta are sorted according to whether they arose spontaneously
(sometimes erroneously labelled as asankharika) or with the intention of receiving something
in return, i.e., sasankharika.
§ The two hate-rooted akusala citta are always done with displeasure and are associated with
aversion (dislike), and the one that is spontaneous (unprompted) is stronger than the prompted.
§ The two ignorance-rooted akusala citta are always done with neutral feeling and the one that is
based on vicikicchā is stronger than the based on uddhacca.
4. The above list gives order of strength of the akusala citta and they are listed in that order in
“Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna”.
§ Thus the first lobha citta that is “connected with wrong view, accompanied by pleasure” or in
Pāli, “somanassa-sahagata, diṭṭhi-sampayutta citta” is the strongest akusala javana citta.
§ The last of the 12 akusala citta is “one accompanied by equanimity and associated with high-
mindedness” or in Pāli, “upekkha-sahagata uddhacca-sampayutta citta“.
5. The power of the human mind can be directed both ways: for the good or the bad. Now let us see
how the 8 mahā kusala (wholesome) citta are sorted according to the javana power.
§ Here again, there are 4 done with joyous heart (somanassa-sahagata) that take precedence over
those done with neutral feeling.
§ Next, those done with knowledge are called “ñāṇa-sampayutta” have higher power compared
to those done without knowledge (ñāṇa-vippayutta). Here, knowledge could at two levels:
understanding how laws of kamma work and an understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta at the
higher level.
§ Finally, they are sorted by whether spontaneous (higher) compared to prompted.
6. Thus the most potent kusala citta is “one accompanied by joy, associated with knowledge” or in
Pāli, “somanassa-sahagata, ñāṇa-sampayutta citta”.
Here one does a good deed with full understanding of its benefits, and thus with a joyous heart, and
without any prompting. It is done spontaneously and joyfully, BECAUSE one is fully aware of its
benefit. Since it is spontaneous the knowledge must be there in one’s mind.
§ The weakest kusala citta is, “one accompanied by neutral mind, dissociated with knowledge,
and for one’s advantage” or in Pāli, “upekkha-sahagata, ñāṇa-vippayutta, sasankharika citta”.
Here one may do a good deed without knowledge either on the prompting by others or after
some deliberation. Such deeds will bring benefits, but since the javana power is reduced, the
benefits are less.
7. Let us take some examples for clarification.
§ Some people are so deep in the wrong path, that they actually enjoy committing bad deeds. Or,
they get into a mindset where such deeds become enjoyable. We have heard of instances where
a person was killed by multiple stabbings or even where the body was mutilated; such an act is
worst of the worst.
§ It should be easy to imagine why the javana for citta associated with such “passionate” killings
are very intense. The killer is absorbed in that act, and is generating potent mental power to
carry out the physical act; by the way any physical act is done with citta; see, “Neuroscience
says there is no Free Will? – That is a Misinterpretation”.
§ This is also why a kamma becomes a “kamma patha” or a “strong kamma” when a bodily act is
committed; one needs strong javana to carry out that task. If one is aware of the consequences
of such acts (i.e., do not have micchā diṭṭhi or wrong vision), then even if one started stabbing,
it is likely that one may catch oneself and stop.
8. On the other hand, even the smallest act of kindness can bring much benefits if it was done with
full understanding and a joyous heart. Here the “mental power” or the javana comes from knowledge
or understanding. We see these kinds of ‘small acts of kindness” all the time, and we can even share
in those merits when our hearts become joyful too.
§ For a well-off person, it is easy to write a check for a lot of money, but if it was done just to get
publicity, or due to “outside pressure”, it will not bring much benefit. If someone who is poor
sees another person that is in even worse condition, and shares what he/she can with that person
with joy, that will bring much more benefit.
9. The javana power of a mind is also described by the term “sanvega” (san + vega, where “vega”
means fast; see, “What is “San”? – Meaning of Saṃsāra” for the meaning of “san“). Therefore,
“sanvega” (sometimes called “samvega“) depicts a potent emotional condition. If it is to the “good”
one will be doing puññabhi abhisaṅkhāra (meritorious acts), and a bad act done with “sanvega” will
be a potent apuññabhi abhisaṅkhāra (immoral acts).
§ In the literature “sanvega” is commonly written as “samvega”; as with many other such words,
replacing “san” with “sam” leads to distortion of the meaning of the word. Other such
misspelled words are saṃsāra, samvedana, samyoga, samvara; see, “What is “San”? –
Meaning of Saṃsāra“.
§ However, some word like “sammā” (“san” + “ma“) are correct, because that is phonetically
correct.
§ In Sinhala language, “sanvega” is commonly used to describe emotionally intense situations
but mostly for sad situations. However, we can see that it should be applicable for all “potent”
emotional situations.
10. The mind and the heart are in close contact. Even that person who derived pleasure by stabbing
someone many times, will have a heavy heart until death, no matter how bad a person he/she is. It is
in the human nature. Of course, when we do a meritorious act too, we feel the joy in our hearts.
§ The reason that we “feel” at the heart is because the citta are generated in association with the
“hadaya vatthu” that is located close to the physical heart. The hadaya vatthu is actually in the
manomaya kaya which is like a “ghost” that is hugging the physical body; see, “Manomaya
Kāya and Physical Body” and “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
11. Getting back to the issue of mental power, it is clear that it makes a big difference on “how much
engaged we are” in our thoughts. Potency of a good or a bad citta is critically dependent on our desire
to get it done. Three out of four bases of mental power, chanda, citta, viriya, originate due to this;
see, “The Four Bases of Mental Power (Satara Iddhipada)“.
§ And the fourth factor of vimansa (reasoning/investigation) is important because that is how one
gains the all-important ñāṇa (wisdom); see #5,#6 above. When one truly comprehends anicca,
dukkha, anatta, that is leads to the cultivation/growing of the paññā cetasika reducing
ignorance (avijjā).
12. Another thing that comes out of this analysis is that it is good to contemplate on the past
good deeds and “re-live” that experience to gain citta pasāda or a joyful mind.
§ Similarly, it is NOT good to do that for past bad deeds; better to forget them and get a new
start. If something like that comes to the mind, think of an opposite good deed and focus the
mind on the good deed.
§ This is part of “Ānāpāna“. We need to keep and cultivate “good things” and “discard” bad
things; see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?“.
§ Our thoughts are what ultimately matter, and they arise due to our character (gathi); the more
we do “Ānāpāna” correctly, the more our “gathi” will change for the better.
13. Finally, These javana citta have the power to produce suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], the
fundamental building blocks of rūpa; see, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
Next, “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“, …………
1. In most realms, beings are born full formed (opapathika births). But in the human and animal
realms, first the blueprint of that life form arises at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment (as a manomaya kāya
or a gandhabba), and once inside a womb the physical body starts growing.
§ Once born a gandhabba, It can possibly make many new physical bodies in a given bhava. For
example, a “human bhava” may last many hundreds of years. But a human lives only about 80
years, so that “human gandhabba” can make many “human bodies” during the existence as a
human; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein“.
§ This is why in some cases of rebirth stories, there are resemblances of both mental and physical
characteristics between the two lives.
2. Let us take the example of a being that was born many times as a cow making a transition to a
human bhava at the end of the “cow bhava” (which is a very rare event).
§ As explained in the post, “Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description“, the transition from
a cow to a human occurs in the last citta vīthi of the “cow life”. At the end of that citta vīthi, a
gandhabba in the form of a human comes out of the dead body of the cow; this is also called
the gandhabba state. This gandhabba has a very fine body that cannot be seen, but it is a
“blueprint” of the human body, except for the “gross physical features” that will be partially
determined by the parents of the new life.
§ This gandhabba now awaits a suitable womb to be available. Of course the gandhabba cannot
decide on a womb; rather, when a suitable womb becomes available (i.e., matching the “gathi”
of the gandhabba), then it will be pulled into the womb by the kammic energy.
§ When a sperm fertilizes an egg in a womb, a single cell called a zygote results. But there is no
life there until the gandhabba enters the womb and is incorporated with that zygote. Now the
zygote becomes an embryo, then a fetus, and once out of the womb grows to a full-size human
according to that blueprint in the gandhabba.
§ More details can be found at, see, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth
Control?“.
3. At the cow-human transition in the last citta vīthi of the cow life, some very important changes
occur in that lifestream. The concept of a lifestream, which is really a very basic introduction, is
discussed at, “What Reincarnates? -Concept of a Lifestream“.
§ Of course the biggest change is that now the lifeform has a mind that is at the human level, not
at the animal level; the baseline “consciousness level” has shifted. This is expressed in several
ways in the manomaya kāya or the gandhabba.
§ At the cuti-paṭisandhi transition, the kammic energy creates three very fine rūpa called vatthu
dasaka, kāya dasaka, and bhava dasaka. We will discuss these in detail later, but they
basically correspond, respectively, to the mind door (or the mind), the blueprint for the
human body, and dominant features including male or female character (it is not just the
sex type, since rupi brahmas also have bhava dasaka, but are gender-neutral).
§ As the physical body grows, first inside the womb and then outside the womb, the fine body of
the manomaya kāya expands with it when the physical body grows from the single cell. Thus
overlapping the physical body that we see, there is a very fine body (manomaya kāya) of the
gandhabba. Gandhabba means the same as the manomaya kāya.
§ Therefore, the gandhabba is really like a “driver” driving or navigating the physical body; see,
“Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
4. The fine body of the gandhabba or the manomaya kāya basically has all key components as the
physical body, but in the form of very fine matter at the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] level. The five
physical sensory inputs of the gandhabba, together with the hadaya vatthu (mind door), are
physically located close to the heart of the physical body; they are not inside the heart, but are sort of
overlapping the heart.
This is why the gandhabba sometimes comes out of the physical body in traumatic situations like
during heart operations; many such “out-of-body experiences” (OBE) have been reported; see,
“Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)“.
§ The main thing to remember is that hadaya vatthu is the mind door, and it is surrounded by the
five pasada rūpa (cakkhu, sota, jivha, gandha, and kaya) which correspond respectively to the
five physical senses of eye, ear, tongue, nose, and touch.
§ The Thus all six sense actions actually take place away from what modern science believe they
take place. Physical eye, ear, nose, tongue are of course in the head (those are the physical
sensors), and the sense of touch is sensed physically via the nevous system. There is also a
“mana indriya” located inside the brain, where the mind inputs (dhamma) come in. Just like our
vision process starts at the eyes, our “external thought inputs” come through the “mana
indriya” in the brain; see, “What are rūpa? – Dhamma are rūpa too!” and “What are Dhamma?
– A Deeper Analysis“.
5. The physical body is really a “shell” that is controlled by the mind (hadaya vatthu). The physical
body is there to be subjected to the kamma vipāka; this is especially true for animals, because they do
not have much control what happens to them.
§ We humans, with the advanced mind, have the ability to avoid bad kamma vipāka and steer our
lives in the direction we want to. We will get into those details later, but let us see how the
gandhabba (or the mind associated with the hadaya vatthu) uses the physical body to
experience the outside world and also to control the body movements.
6. The world is experienced through the physical body, and this basic interaction is slow compared to
the fast pace of the citta. The sensory data are collected by the five physical senses of eye, ear, nose,
tongue, and the body. Then they are transmitted to the brain via the central nervous system, which
takes times of millisecond scale.
§ At the brain, data for a certain time interval (possibly around 10 milliseconds; see, “Citta and
Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“) are processed and then converted to a
format suitable for transmission to the five pasada rūpa and the hadaya vatthu, via a fast “ray
system” (called “kirana” in Pāli or Sinhala).
§ Individual “packets of information” from each of the five senses are then transmitted to the
corresponding pasada rūpa and the hadaya vatthu are located on the manomaya kāya, which
overlaps the physical body; information from the mana indriya are sent to the hadaya vatthu.
7. For example, let us consider a “packet of data” sent from the physical eye to the brain. This
information is processed by the brain, converted to a “ray system” and is transmitted to the cakkhu
pasada. Now the cakkhu pasada vibrates and hits the hadaya vatthu that is located close to it (hadaya
vatthu is surrounded by the five pasada rūpa); this causes the hadaya vatthu to vibrate 17 times,
much like a gong hit by an iron rod vibrating for a certain fixed number of times.
§ The 17 vibrations of the hadaya vatthu correspond to the 17 citta in a citta vīthi. Such a citta
vīthi is called a pancadvaravajjana citta vīthi because it is initiated by one of the five physical
senses or pancadvara (“panca” or five + “dvara” or “door”).
§ Imagine a blade clamped at one edge and is hit by an object on the other edge; it vibrates for a
certain FIXED number of times per second; that number is called frequency of vibration and is
fixed for a given material. And one can see the blade vibrating. Pretty much the same thing
happens when the hadaya vatthu vibrates when hit by one of the pasada rūpa, and this
“vibration” is called a hadaya rūpa, which thus has a lifetime of 17 citta. Thus the hadaya rūpa
is not a physical rūpa but basically is a mode of vibration.
§ The misconception that any rūpa has a lifetime of 17 thought moments arose because of not
understanding that it is the hadaya rūpa that has a lifetime of 17 thought moments.
§ In other words, this information packet is received and processed by the hadaya vatthu within
those 17 citta. The information is fully received by the fourth citta (vibration) and then the rest
of the citta in that citta vīthi deal with this information. This “information processing” by the
hadaya vatthu will not be completed until three more citta vīthi run by the hadaya vatthu itself.
Such citta vīthi initiated by the mind itself is called a manodvara citta vīthi, where manodvara
means the “mind door”.
§ Information packets from the mana indriya are sent directly to the hadaya vatthu.
8. Thus we can see that there is a huge difference in time between the physical body acquiring senses
data (time of the order of 10 milliseconds) and the mind processing that information within a billionth
of a second using one pancadvaravajjana citta vīthi and three manodvara citta vīthi.
§ Even if the five senses keep sending data continuously, the mind is “just sitting there” most of
the time. Let us examine this in a bit detail: Suppose the brain keep sending data from the eye
non-stop; since each “packet” takes, say 10 milliseconds, then in a second there will be 100
“data packets” of vision coming in. If the brain is going at full speed, it can send at most 500
(=100×5) “data packets” from all 5 physical senses in a second. Then the mind will be spending
less than a millionth of a second in processing all that data, since it takes less than a billionth of
a second to process one “data packet” (from previous bullet).
§ During those gaps, the hadaya vathu also interacts (both ways) with the mana indriya. In
particular, it gives instructions to the mana indriya on how to control the physical body in
response to the sense inputs.
§ Thus most of the time the mind is just sitting there, and this is called the “bhavaṅga” state of
the mind. In this state, the mind is actually taking the object that came to the mind at the
paṭisandhi (rebirth) moment in that last citta vīthi of the last life. Bhavaṅga (“bhava” + “anga”
or associated) denotes that this state of the mind is characteristic of this new life, in the present
case as a human. Just like the eye cannot see itself, the mind cannot see this “bhavaṅga“, it is
the present mind itself.
9. In the example that we started with, the “cow mind” has now switched over to a “human mind”,
and that has the object taken at the paṭisandhi moment. This could be remembering a past kamma that
led to this human life (for example, the new life may have started off with the image of a good deed
done in a past life that came to the new mind at the paṭisandhi moment). But we do not become aware
of what is in the bhavaṅga.
§ You may remember that there are times when one just stares blankly “out into the space”, and if
someone asked “what were you thinking about?”, we would be hard-pressed to recall anything
that we were thinking about. Here the mind was mostly in the bhavaṅga state; we are aware
that we were alive, but did not have “actual thoughts” going through the mind.
§ In reality, even when we think we are fully engaged, the mind is mostly in the bhavaṅga state.
As we discussed in a previous bullet, even if all five physical senses keep sending data about
the outside world non-stop, the mind takes less than a millionth of a second to process those
data coming in within a second!
10. However, the sixth sense or the mind (hadaya vatthu) itself is also initiating citta vīthi either to
process information from the five physical senses, or to “think about those senses inputs”.
Furthermore, it also initiates citta vīthi to get the physical body to speak and to do any kind of
work; this information is relayed to the mana indriya, which in turn works with the brain to carry out
those instructions.
§ For example, if the mind gets interested in a sound that the ear sent, it may direct the body to
walk towards the source of that sound. To do this, it sends the instructions to the mana indriya
in the brain via the same “ray system” almost instantaneously. The mana indriya then decodes
that information — and working with other parts of the brain — sends instructions to the
muscles in the legs (via the nervous system) to move. These bodily movements take time,
because the mechanical motions are comparatively slow.
§ Speech is done in the same way: The mind sends the information to the brain and the brain gets
the vocal chords to move to produce the sounds. Here is a short video showing how the muscle
movements give rise to sounds:
WebLink: YOUTUBE: Inside the Voice
11. Thus we can see that the brain is just a very fancy computer, carrying out the instructions given
by the mind.
§ Now the questions arises, “Why is nature going through all this trouble to give us a physical
body that is sort of cumbersome and slow?”. The main answer is that this is to impart kamma
vipāka.
§ For example, a deva has a fine body that is not subject to aches and diseases as for humans; that
was acquired by a good kamma vipāka. On the other hand, there are some petas (hungry ghosts)
who have large bodies, but a very small mouth to impart suffering from hunger.
§ In the human realm, our individual bodies are “pre-designed” by kamma vipāka is impart
varying degrees of suffering, and that is why some people are relatively healthy, while some
have health problems. There are of course ways to reduce or even get rid of such problems by
making suitable conditions (eating well, exercise, etc) for other good kamma vipāka to
materialize.
§ We do not realize the constant stresses that we are subjected to (both physical and mental), until
we begin to experience at least some kind of nirāmisa sukha achieved by “liberating the mind
from the cumbersome body with its aches and pains”. When one gets to jhāna, this is further
enhanced, and at higher jhāna one sees quite significant relief from “dissociating from the
body”. And one makes big jump in attaining the Sotāpanna stage, and of course the full release
at the Arahant stage of Nibbāna.
It is possible that I may not have clearly explained some concepts. If you send me a comment
referring to the corresponding item number, I can try to clarify it. Also, when you read other posts in
this section, things will become more clear. This basic description is critical if one is really serious
about learning Abhidhamma.
Next, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“, ……..
12.5.2 Does any Object (Rupa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?
Revised October 29, 2015; updated April 5, 2016; revised August 18, 2019
1. In August/September 2015, I watched a popular Abhidhamma program (in Sinhala) from Sri Lanka
on Youtube. It was very good in many aspects, but it had two fundamental problems:
§ First, the incorrect interpretation of anicca and anatta as “impermanence” and “no-self.” I have
many posts on this site explaining why those two interpretations are critically flawed.
§ The second main problem that I noticed was the repeated statement that “Anything in this
world lasts only a brief moment. Any object is formed and destroyed within a short time of the
order of a thought-moment. Then it is re-formed, and the process continues ceaselessly. What
you see now is not the same thing that was there a thought moment before”.
§ Then that “creation/destruction” process was tied to the concept of “impermanence” mentioned
above.
Here is a direct quote from another source, which is a popular book on Abhidhamma: “..a rūpa is
very short-lived – it endures only for 17 conscious moments. Whatever object formed is almost
instantly gone”. Thus it is a widespread misconception.
2. I have explained in other posts what the correct interpretations of anicca and anatta. Let us focus
on the second point, the claim that “any object lives only for 17 thought-moments” in this post.
§ A saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) arises due to causes and lasts until those causes are there. It is
a bit more complicated, and is discussed in the section, “Udayavaya Ñāṇa.”
§ The arising of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) is due to paṭicca samuppāda; that is the “udaya”
or “arise” part. Once formed, different saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) will have different
lifetimes, and eventually decay; that is “vaya.”
§ Udayavaya describes the formation and destruction of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)
(“Udaya” means to arise, and “vaya” means destruction). But a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala)
could last for a long time.
3. It seems to me that this misinterpretation comes from taking the lifetime of a “rūpa” to be 17
thought moments. But as we discussed in “Manomaya Kāya – Introduction,” that is the lifetime of a
hadaya rūpa.
4. Different saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) have different lifetimes. A fly may live for a few days, a
human about 100 years, a building may last hundreds of years, the Earth will last about 4-5 billion
more years, etc.
§ An inert object, like a building, will start slowly decaying. If a building lasts 1000 years, then
each day, it will “decay” by a little bit, though the decay can be expected to accelerate towards
the end.
§ From the present time to the final destruction (or until death in the case of a living being), any
given saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) will change. If we consider a baby born today, it will first
grow to become a young person. Then it will gradually start weakening while becoming an
older adult and eventually die one day. Therefore, the critical aspect is not destruction, but
change. While the baby is growing, the cells in the body will multiply; but in an older person’s
body, more cells will be dying.
5. This constant change is not discernible to us on a real-time basis. A person does not age while we
are watching him/her. But we can see the change over several years, especially if they are very young
or over the middle age.
§ Mayflies have a lifetime of the order of a day (after the larval stage), and some live only several
hours; here is a short video by the National Geographic channel:
WebLink: NATGEOTV: 24-Hour Lifecycle
§ Thus there is a HUGE difference in saying that a given material object CHANGES
moment-to-moment versus saying that the object is “RECREATED” every 17 thought
moments. During the presentation that I mentioned at the beginning, the presenter was showing
a pen and said that the pen is “destroyed and recreated” EVERY 17 thought moments! By
extending that logic one could say that any entity (say, the Earth) is vanished and “recreated”
within 17 thought moments! A complete misunderstanding of the udayavaya process of a
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala).
6. So, where does this incorrect statement come from? “.. rūpa is very short lived – it endures only
for 17 conscious moments. What is formed is almost instantly gone.”
§ The confusion arises when one does not understand the concept of a hadaya rūpa. A hadaya
rūpa is generated in the hadaya vatthu by a sense event through one of the five physical senses.
The lifetime of a hadaya rūpa is the time taken to experience that external sense event. That
takes 17 thought moments (during which an impression of the external rūpa is made in mind by
a citta vīthi). It is wrong to take this time to be the lifetime of the object in question; see,
“Manomaya Kāya – Introduction“.
§ The question is how we EXPERIENCE a given rūpa or an object. We experience outside
material things in our world through our five physical senses. We see with eyes, hear with ears,
smell with the nose, taste with the tongue, and touch with our body.
§ However, our minds only catch a very brief (a thought-moment’s worth) of the seeing, hearing,
etc. experience at a time. It is not that the object lives a short time; it is just that we sense it only
for a brief moment at a time! Let us discuss this in detail.
7. Each of these five senses events is accomplished via a thought, even though we may not perceive it
that way. Details at “Citta and Cetasika – How Viññāṇa (Consciousness) Arises“. I highly
recommend reading that post before proceeding further.
§ When we see an object, our eyes send the image of the object to the brain via the neurons. The
brain process that image. Each image is of the order of 10 milliseconds (Buddha Dhamma does
not provide these times; I am using the time that scientists have discovered).
§ But the brain does not feel anything; it is the mind that feels sensations.
§ The brain processes that information and transmits it to the location of the mind (called hadaya
vatthu) which overlaps the heart, but not in it.
§ Now, it takes the mind 17 thought-moments (or 17 citta) to process that information and
identify the object and make decisions about it; this series of citta is called a “citta vīthi.” There
will be many such citta vīthi before we “see it.”
8. Many things happen during that citta vīthi: the mind recognizes the object, forms a like/dislike
about it, decides on what to do, and lastly may do something about it. That is why there are 17 cittas
in the series. Towards the end of the citta vīthi, seven javana cittas carry out the actions or speech
about the object based on the decisions made earlier part of the citta vīthi. That is a very brief
statement of what happens in that citta vīthi.
§ Three more manodvāra citta vīthi run following each pañcadvāra citta vīthi. Of course, it happens
so fast that we are not aware of these details. Only a Buddha can see such fast processes.
§ When we are having a conversation with someone, we can see her and hear what she says “at the
same time.” But it only appears that we are seeing and listening at the same time. The sights and
sounds are received and processed by the brain in packets as we discussed above. But the mind
processes each packet in less than a millionth of a second in a citta vīthi!
§ If we are eating popcorn while watching TV, that taste also comes in packets. The tongue sends
about 10 ms worth of “taste information” to the brain and brain processes that information and
transmits to the mind. The same thing happens with sounds and body touches. As those
“information packets” continuously come in, we PERCEIVE that we are experiencing such
sensations continually. Only one “data packet” is processed at a time, so there is at least a 10 ms
delay between adjacent packets.
9. Therefore, we can be using all five senses at the same time, and all that information processed in
“10 ms packets”. Since there are 1000 milliseconds in a second, we can say that a maximum of about
100 such “information packets” are received by the mind each second.
§ However, that is fast enough for us to PERCEIVE that we are experiencing all these sense
inputs continuously. Now, the only part I borrowed from science is the estimated 10 ms
duration for each information packet. Those studies have been published only recently.
§ Science, of course, is not aware of the role of the mind. As far as science is concerned, the brain
does everything, and the brain is the mind. However, I believe that scientists will have to
change that theory in the future.
10. In any case, what happens in mind is analogous to what happens when we watch a movie. We
perceive that we are watching a continuous movie. But in reality what happens is that the movie
projector projects static pictures to the screen at a rate of about 30-60 frames a second. Here again,
each static image is of 20-30 ms duration. But it is fast enough for us to perceive that we are watching
a continuous movie.
§ In the same way, our minds perceive that we are watching, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching
all at the same time. But each sensory event is brief lived. Even though each “information packet”
sent by the brain is from a 10 ms “time slice,” the mind processes that information in a citta vīthi
lasting 17 cittas. And each citta lasts much less than a billionth of a second. Thus each “snapshot”
processed by the mind takes an unimaginably short time.
11. Now if one thinks carefully, it is apparent that the mind is idle most the time waiting for input
signals from the brain. In a given second, there are only about 100 such “data packets” coming to the
mind as we discussed above. The mind spends only 100 citta vīthi for processing that information,
which takes less than a millionth of a second for the mind!
§ The rest of the time, the mind is at what is called the “bhavaṅga state.” Thus the mind is mostly
in the “bhavaṅga state.”
§ We can see that the mind is engaged in “experiencing the world” for short times. Each
perception event lasts only 17 thought moments, an unimaginably short time; see, “Manomaya
Kāya – Introduction.”
12. So, how does the mind perceive continuously, and take into account what happened in the past? It
is done by several mental factors (cetasika) in each citta. In particular, the manasikara cetasika
brings old memories, saññā cetasika recognizes, etc.
§ Therefore, we can see that our experience of external objects is very, very brief. A snapshot of a
picture, sound, etc. comes to the mind and is gone. The perception of a solid image, sound,
taste, etc. is put together by the mind with the help of a set of cetasika, especially seven
cetasika that are in any citta.
13. Now it should be apparent where the misconception in the statement, comes from: “.. rūpa is
very short lived – it endures only for 17 conscious moments. Whatever object formed is almost
instantly gone.”
§ It is not that any rūpa (or the object) is short-lived. It is just that the duration of experiencing
that object is extremely short. We think we are seeing, hearing, tasting, etc. all the time; but we
are not. Just like we are only watching a series of static pictures while watching a movie, our
mind is only experiencing a series of “snapshots.”
§The “ghana saññā” or the “perception of solid and continuous experience” is an illusion created
by the mind. That is an important point. If it is not clear, re-read the above.
§ You are always welcome to point out inaccuracies or unclear instances. My goal is not to post
essays but to make sure the content is understood. To comprehend Buddha Dhamma requires a
lot of thought.
14. Therefore, objects around us do not necessarily change fast and not that fast. It is just that our
experience of “seeing” lasts less than a millionth of a second at a time. If we look at an object
for 60 seconds, the mind sees it in about 600 static frames (per #9 above) . Out of those 60
seconds, the mind “sees” the object for less than a millionth of a second in total, but spread over the
60 seconds in “snapshots,” an unbelievably short time.
§ For example, a gold bar is virtually unchanged during 17 thought-moments. A gold bar lasts
millions of years, so the change in the gold bar in a thought moment is insignificantly small.
Even in a mayfly that lasts only a day, the change that happens within 17 cittas is
unmeasurably little. Thus the statement, “.. rūpa is very short lived – it endures only for 17
conscious moments. Whatever object formed is almost instantly gone” is
WRONG .
§ It is the “sensing event” or the hadaya rūpa that lasts 17 thought moments; see, “Manomaya
Kāya – Introduction.”
15. Buddha Dhamma (i.e., the world) is complicated enough; we need to be careful not to make it any
more complicated than necessary. Trying to imagine a person disappearing in a thought-moment and
reforming back into full form is unrealistic. Trying to conceive the same for the Earth is mind-
boggling, not to mention all those stars, galaxies, out there. Luckily that is not what happens.
§ That is not what was described by the Buddha when he said, “ditte ditta mantan bhavissati.” It
means, “what is seen is seen only for a brief moment.” Mantan is “mātra” in Sinhala or
Sanskrit or a “trace of something.”
16. Even though we think we see a person all the time while we are looking at him, we see only
several “snapshots” of him.
§ What about hearing? We usually speak 100 to 160 words per minute, which means we listen to
the same rates. Thus we hear about two words per second. A word typically has less than ten
letters, and thus each letter is comprehended in about 50 ms. Therefore, our rough estimate
seems to hold. We indeed hear only one letter at a time, but we think we hear whole words or
phrases.
17. Other sense inputs work the same way: The Buddha also said, “sute suta mattan bhavissati”,
“mute muta mattan bhavissati”, and “viññāte viññāta mattan bhavissati”, where “suta” means
hearing, “muta” is a collective word for taste, smell, and touch, and “viññāta” is for viññāṇa. All our
sensory inputs and our awareness are minuscule traces of sensations that flow, which the mind
concocts as continuous and stable experiences. Think about the movie analogy again; a movie is a
series of static “snapshots.” In the same way, our experiences are a series of “snapshots.”
§ In Brahma worlds, there is only a “manomaya kāya” and no solid body like ours. There, the
sense experience more or less continuous. There are some “hungry ghosts” (petas) who also
have only the fine “manomaya kāya” that imparts endless suffering.
§ Our physical body is there to give pain via various body ailments as well as “physical
pleasures”; we will also discuss this critical point in the future. Nature has many varieties of
“body structures” for imparting different types of suffering/enjoyment, according to kamma
vipāka.
§ That will become even more clear when we further discuss how the “manomaya kāya controls
the physical body,” see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kaya?.”
18. There is a lot of information to be absorbed in this post. Our lives are just a series of very brief
sense experiences. When the Buddha uttered those four phrases to the ascetic Bahiya Daruciriya, he
contemplated on them right there and attained the Arahantship. He is considered to be the person who
spent the least time in reaching Arahantship.
More on the formation and destruction of a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) in, “Nirodha and Vaya –
Two Different Concepts.”
Next, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?”, …….
12.5.3 Hidden World of the Gandhabba: Netherworld (Para Loka)
1. I have discussed the fact that when a living being gets a “human bhava” it does not necessarily
mean that it is born with a human body during all that time; see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence
and Births Therein“.
§ For example, when a human dies and still has kammic energy left for the human bhava, then it
is very unlikely that it will be conceived as a human baby right away. At death a “human
gandhabba” with a fine body leaves the dead body and has to wait in that state until a suitable
womb becomes available. There are a large (uncountable?) number of such human gandhabbas
waiting for a suitable womb.
§ This is one reason that a mother and father are so revered. No matter how bad they may be in
some cases, just the fact that they made it possible for a gandhabba to have a human body,
makes them invaluable.
2. Beings are born as human because they crave the sense pleasures associated with the human body.
The most valued are the tastes and the body pleasures. A gandhabba has a very fine body that we
cannot see weighing much less than 0.01 g; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Physical Body“. A
gandhabba born at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment is much smaller than an atom in modern science.
Some could inhale aroma (gandha) and get a bit more dense; thus the name “gandhabba” (“gandha”
+ “abba“).
§ Thus a gandhabba is unable to taste solid food or experience physical touch. But they can see
and hear very well. Thus their life is miserable, since they can see the normal humans engaging
is “pleasurable activities”. That is what they crave too, but they are unable to experience them.
§ When a zygote is created in a womb as a result of intercourse (see, “What does Buddha
Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“), there are a huge number of gandhabbas
waiting to “get hold of that zygote”. But of course, they don’t have a choice; only the
gandhabba matching the “gathi” of the father — and especially the mother — is pulled into the
womb.
3. Therefore, even though a human “bhava” may last thousands of years, the actual time that one is
“born with a human body” (human jathi) could be a fraction of that time. This is another reason why
a “human birth” is so precious that it should not be wasted.
§ The same is true for the “animal bhava“. There are an uncountable number of “animal
gandhabbas” waiting for a suitable womb at any given time.
4. Both the human and animal gandhabbas can be said to live in “para loka” (“paralowa” in
Sinhala). It is a world that a normal human cannot see, even though they can see us. Of course there
is no English word for it, but “netherworld” or “the hidden world” seems to convey the idea.
§ Para loka is not a distinct realm in the 31 realms. Just like human and animal realms co-exist,
the para loka co-exists with the human and animal realms, but we normally cannot see those
beings in the para loka (unless one develops abhiññā powers). One can imagine there being
another world with human and animal gandhabbas. Thus gandhabbas are not pretas.
§ WebLink: Listen to Pronunciation: “paralowa” or “para loka“
§ Those with “human (or animal) bhava” spend their time either in “this world that we can see”
or in the “para loka” or the “hidden world” (netherworld).
§ Many people are not even aware of the existence of “para loka“, because (like the concept of
the gandhabba), it is not discussed in the Visuddhimagga. It is unfortunate that current
Theravāda relies on Visuddhimagga (written by an Anariya) rather than the Tipiṭaka.
§ Gandhabba is described in detail the Tirokudda Sutta in the Khuddaka Nikāya, where it is
called “tirokudda” or “tirokuddaya“, instead of gandhabba.
5. The idea behind giving a special offerings (“dāna“) to the bhikkhus after the death of a person is
mainly for the benefit of the gandhabbas (and also pretas). This is a common practice in Buddhist
countries. Normally it is done after seven days and after three months etc of death, and I will discuss
the reasons for those specific dates in a future post.
§ Not all beings can receive merits. Especially those in the niraya (hell) are unable to do so
because they don’t have the right mindset to receive merits (absence of samanantara paccayā).
Those who can benefit most are the gandhabbas and pretas.
§ Also, note that gandhabba are totally distinct from pretas or hell beings in the niraya. Only
gandhabbas live in “para loka” waiting for suitable wombs. Pretas and hell beings have
instantaneous (opapātika) births, just like devas and brahmas.
6. It has been described how the Buddha saw human beings wander from life-to-life when he first
comprehended the cutupapada ñāṇa during the night of his Enlightenment; “cutupapada” comes
from “cuti” for death and “upapada” for birth.
§ Thus cutupapada ñāṇa is the knowledge about the rebirth process. But this particular
description was restricted to births and deaths associated with a single human bhava.
§ Cuti is pronounced “chuthi”, and “cutupapāda nāna” is pronounced “chuthupapāda gnāna”.
§ WebLink: Listen to Pronunciation: “cutupapāda nāna”
7. That description by the Buddha was not about the general wandering among the 31 realms, but is
on how a being in a human bhava wanders from human birth to human birth with gandhabba states in
between (i.e., going back and forth between “this world that we can see” and the “other world that we
cannot see” or the para loka).
§ The description is as follows: If one is situated in the upper level of a building at a four-way
junction, he can see the street below. He can see many people wandering in the street
(gandhabbas wandering around). Sometimes, one goes into a house and stays there for a long
time. This is compared to a gandhabba entering a womb and making himself a physical body;
that house is the analogy of a physical body.
§ Then at the death of that physical body, the gandhabba comes out and starts wandering again (a
person walking on the street); he may be wandering the streets for a long time before entering
“another house”, i.e., to get a chance to go into a matching womb.
§ Sometimes, he may enter a house and may come right out. This can be compared to an
unsuccessful pregnancy. A gandhabba taking hold of a zygote, but for some reason cannot stay
there and has to come out, mostly because it turns out to be a mis-match of “gathi” of the
potential mother.
§ Thus it describes a human being going back and forth between “this world” and the “other
world” or the “netherworld” (“para loka“). Once the kammic energy of the human bhava is
exhausted, a new “bhava” is grasped.
§ If the new bhava is not human or animal, then one would be born instantaneously in another
realm (brahma, deva, asura, preta, or niraya). There are no gandhabbas associated with those
realms.
§ Thus we can see that bhava and jathi mean the same in all the other realms. In those realms,
bhava automatically leads to jathi. For example, one with deva bhava is always a deva.
8. When one studies the accounts of people (of mostly children) describing their rebirth stories, there
are always “gaps” between births; see, the references (books) cited in “Evidence of Rebirth“. For
example, see, “Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation”, by Ian
Stevenson (2000).
§ During those “gaps” in between successive human births, they had been in the gandhabba state,
i.e., they were in para loka.
§ When one dies in an accident especially at a younger age, it is more likely that their kammic
energy for the human bhava had not been exhausted. Thus they are more likely to be in the
gandhabba state, waiting for a suitable womb.
§ This is why in most rebirth stories the previous life tends to have been terminated by an
unexpected incident (killed by someone, a natural disaster, etc).
§ This “memory from the past life” fades away as children grow, and that is why it is mostly
children who provide these accounts. As they grow old, these memories disappear gradually.
9. A gandhabba changes with time (just like everything else). In fact, it is even possible that if a
gandhabba properly receives merits from an almsgiving (dāna) mentioned in #5 above, he/she can
gain a deva or brahma bhava and be born instantly in such a realm.
§ On the other hand, another human gandhabba, who had been engaged in behavior appropriate
for an animal (say, a dog) in the previous human life, could cultivate those “dog saṅkhāra” as a
gandhabba and slowly transform into a “dog gadhabbaya” while in para loka.
§ When we think about these possibilities we realize how complex life is, and why we need to be
mindful of the consequences of our actions. Not only that, we need to avoid doing things
mechanically and understand the reasons behind even meritorious actions like alms-giving. I
have seen many almsgivings that are conducted in a “party-like” atmosphere. One needs to do it
with the proper mindset with the gandhabba(s) in mind.
10. Another interesting bit of deduction is how the concept of a soul or “athma” came to be
established by the ancient Hindu yogis. Even to attain higher anariya jhānas (above the fourth jhāna)
that enables one to acquire the ability to see previous lives, one has to have that “gathi” of cultivating
jhānas through recent human lives. Therefore, such a yogi with powerful abhiññā powers can be
expected to have had many recent human lives.
§ Thus it is possible that such yogis would have been born human hundreds of times (with
gandhabba states in between). When they looked at their previous lives, they could see that
every time they died a gandhabba came out, and sooner or later took hold of another human
body. Thus it is this gandhabba that they thought was the indestructible “athma” or “soul”.
They could look back hundreds of lives and always see that they were born as human again and
again.
§ Thus, in the Hindu scripture Bhagavad Gita, getting hold of a new body is compared to
discarding an old suit and wearing a new suit. As far as those yogis could see, it was the same
gandhabba that came back in a different physical appearance! Thus for them it appeared that
there was an unchanging entity coming back in a different form; this is why it is called
“reincarnation”.
11. Our world is much more complex than we can ever imagine. The Buddha said that only a Buddha
can truly comprehend the complexity of this world: “loka visaya acinteyya” for a normal human, i.e.,
a normal human, by himself, cannot grasp the true nature to the full extent.
§ Even though we do not need to comprehend everything (and we cannot), it is beneficial to learn
these concepts at least to some extent.
§ If one can comprehend anicca, these in-depth analyses are not needed. But especially these
days, humans do not have the ability to grasp anicca right away. So, learning Dhamma and
appreciating the unmatched knowledge of the Buddha gives one the confidence to persevere in
one’s efforts.
12.5.4 Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?
1. The “mind-body problem” has been a central problem of philosophy since Descartes formulated it
over 350 years ago. René Descartes proposed that while the physical body is subjected to the physical
laws, there is a soul associated with a human body which is normally called the “mind” and it is non-
material; for him, having a mind amounted to having an immaterial soul, outside the physical space,
whose essence consisted in thinking. This is the so-called “Cartesian dualism”.
§ Here mind and body are on equal footing, each in its own domain.
2. Philosophers no longer take this “dualism” view seriously. Instead current philosophers have
adopted a “material monism” that claim that our world is fundamentally material; this is materialism
or physicalism. The only question they are debating on is how the “mental” arises from “material”,
i.e., how thoughts arise in a material brain.
§ We must note that the Buddha’s worldview is totally different from both the above. It is
“mental monism”, i.e., that our world is fundamentally mental. This is why he said his Dhamma
is “pubbe anunussetu dhammesu” or a Dhamma (or a theory on nature) that was not known to
the world.
§ This world view of the Buddha has been hidden for many centuries.
§ This is of course a paradigm shift and a shocking one too at the first glance. But I hope to
convince you with evidence gathered from various fields of study and illustrate the consistency
across diverse disciplines.
§ It must be mentioned that this monism is not the “mental monism” (or “idealism”) that a few
philosophers have proposed. They say that material things are mere imagination. On the
contrary, the physical world is very real, it is just that it cannot provide any lasting happiness
because of its transient nature.
3. In 1949 Gilbert Ryle introduced the phrase “ghost in the machine” to ridicule the concept of
Cartesian dualism in his book, “The Concept of Mind”. It is said that with that book, he put the final
nail in the coffin of Cartesian dualism. Of course, the “ghost” is the soul or the mind and the machine
is the body, in “ghost in the machine”.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, it is not a called a “ghost” but a “gandhabba“; see, “Mental Body –
Gandhabba“.
4. I think the ghost in machine analog is actually a good one to describe a human or an animal. The
body actually plays a secondary role, and the mind is the controlling entity. But the “ghost” or the
manomaya kāya is NOT all mental; it has a fine form of matter even though it would not be
detectable by current scientific instruments.
I must emphasize that this concept is NOT a version of dualism. Mind and body are interdependent:
“viññāṇa paccayā nāmarūpa” and “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāṇa“; a manomaya kāya has both
nāmarūpa and mind.
§ This manomaya kāya is made by the last citta vīthi of the previous existence (bhava), which is
called cuti (pronounced “chuthi”) citta; see, “What is a Thought?” in the Abhidhamma section.
Thus this fine material form was PRODUCED by the mind. This is why it is said, “mano
pubbangamā dhammā…..”, i.e., “the mind precedes EVERYTHING…”.
§ You probably have seen pictures of a “misty ghostly figure” rising out of a physical body in
literature on “astral projection” or “out-of-body experience”. That is a good visual, but of
course only people with abhiññā powers can see them.
§ Many people have, though, experienced this out-of-body experience usually under stressful
conditions. Most common is the case when a patient undergoes an operation and is
unconscious, but recalls later how he/she was able to see the operation from above. This seems
to happen more often to women than to men; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body
Experience (OBE)“.
5. When one has cultivated abhiññā powers, one can bring out the gandhabba or the manomaya kāya
out of the physical body. Then the body is lifeless, until the gandhabba comes back into the body.
The “ghost” or the manomaya kāya can now see and hear without the aid of a physical ear or eye.
Thus it can “focus” on events happening far away, and can see and hear what is going on at that
place.
§ All this may sound very esoteric but there is a lot out there that is not “captured” by our five
physical senses; see, “The 4 percent Universe : Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Race to
Discover the Rest of Reality” by Richard Panek (2011).
§ Our eyes can see only an infinitesimally small part of the electromagnetic spectrum from 390
nm – 700 nm. The human audible range is commonly given as 20 to 20,000 Hz, though there is
considerable variation between individuals. Modern scientific instruments can expand these, for
example, to see in the infrared frequencies with infrared cameras, etc.
§ The “ghost” does not need light to see or a sound wave to travel to hear.
6. The manomaya kāya has all six senses in the sense that all five pasāda rūpa corresponding to the
five physical senses and also the hadaya vatthu that is the “seat of consciousness”. The hadaya
vatthu, where citta (thoughts) are originated, lines up with the physical heart, not the brain.
Thus we can say that mind is located close to the heart, and is not in the brain; brain is like a
computer that helps run the physical body; see, “Neuroscience Says there is no Free Will – That
is a Misinterpretation!“.
§ The five pasāda rūpa in the manomaya kāya are also located close to the hadaya vatthu.
Signals between the five physical sense faculties (eye, ear, etc) — called five indriya — and the
five pasāda rūpa, and also between the (frontal cortex of the) brain and the hadaya vatthu,
occur via a “ray system”, probably electromagnetic, and are thus very fast.
§ However, the “eye” is not just the “eye ball” but includes associated processing units in the
brain, which is the visual cortex. It is the visual cortex that sends the signal to the “cakkhu
pasāda” located close to the hadaya vatthu. When the cakkhu pasāda receives a signal from the
visual cortex (“eye indriya“), it hits the hadaya vatthu which in turn vibrates 17 times
corresponding to a “citta vīthi“.
§ The same process occurs for the other four physical senses. The “motor cortex” sends/receives
signals from all body parts using the central nervous system, and sends “ray signals” to the
“kāya pasāda“. I will discuss this in detail later.
§ The five pasāda rūpa are located around the hadaya vatthu much like the five small balls
(clappers) are situated around the “main clapper” in temple bells in Sri Lanka (I am not sure
whether this true in other countries). Such a bell symbolizes the five pasāda rūpa around the
hadaya vatthu.
§ When the “ghost” is inside the physical body, it cannot see or hear without the aid of the
physical senses of eyes and ears. Similarly, the mind cannot “think” without the aid of the
brain.
§ This is why the efficiency of all six senses degrade with time: Because the physical body
degrades. As we get old, all six physical sense faculties of eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body (outer
skin), and the brain degrade, and lose their effectiveness.
7. Thus in the visualization as a “ghost”, the manomaya kāya has all six senses. But it cannot use the
kāya pasāda outside the physical body since not enough “matter’ is in the gandhabba to “feel” the
touching sensation. Similarly, the manomaya kāya (“ghost”) cannot taste or smell when it is outside
the physical body.
§ Thus the gandhabba can only see and hear when outside the physical body. And it can do those
without any limitations imposed by physical eye or physical ear, i.e. it can see and hear things
far away.
8. When a human dies, if there is still kammic energy left for the “human bhava”, i.e., the potential to
be born as a human, then there is no paṭisandhi citta at death. A paṭisandhi (“pati” + “sandhi” = bind
to a new life) happens when a transition to a “new bhava”, for example to a “deva bhava” or an
“animal bhava”, happens. If the ‘bhava” remains the same and the next birth is also human, the
manomaya kāya (“ghost” in this new terminology) or the gandhabba just comes out and waits until a
suitable womb becomes available. The old physical body is now lifeless and just decays.
9. If the kammic energy for the “human bhava” is exhausted at death, then in the last citta vīthi the
transition to a new “bhava” takes place. Then a new manomaya kāya for the new existence (bhava) is
formed within that final citta vīthi, and at the end of that citta vīthi, the new manomaya kāya
corresponding to the new life comes out of the dead body. If it is deva, then a new deva is instantly
born in the deva loka. If it is an animal, say a dog, then a manomaya kāya (or gandhabba) that
resembles the form of a dog comes out of the dead body and will wait until a suitable “dog womb”
becomes available.
§ As mentioned in other posts, births in 29 realms happen instantaneously, i.e, a fully formed
figure is born at the very instant of death in the previous life. An intermediate “gandhabba
state” with a manomaya kāya (a “ghost” in the current analogy) that needs to wait for a suitable
womb is involved only for birth in human and animal realms.
10. There is another interesting facet: The kammic energy automatically prepares the “blueprint of the
body” to deliver the kamma vipāka (consequences of previous actions). Thus the physical body has
“built-in” defects and flaws that may become evident at birth or at different stages of life: for
example a cancer may develop at latter stages of life. This is the reason why some people are born
handicapped; some have healthy bodies, beautiful bodies, ugly bodies, and a healthy person may die
suddenly too; the varieties are endless.
§ Furthermore, the nervous system is also setup to induce various effects as kamma vipāka. The
incessant “urge to do something” works at different levels for different people. This actually
reveals a deeper meaning of the First Noble Truth of Suffering; if you are ready for a deeper
analysis, see, “The Incessant Distress (“Pilana”) – Key to Dukkha Sacca”.
11. Therefore, the concept of a “ghost in the machine” may be useful to describe the gandhabba state
or the separation of the manomaya kāya from the physical body in the cases of out-of-body
experience (OBE), or with abhiññā powers. However, it must be kept in mind that in this case, the
“ghost” does not depict an unchanging soul and also it is not totally “mental”; it has very fine
material (rūpa) associated with it, that is invisible to the naked eye, but is visible to someone with
abhiññā powers.
§ Contrary to the idea of a soul, the manomaya kāya will keep changing even during an given
existence and will make a huge transition at a new existence, for example when an animal is
reborn a human or vice versa.
12. The main usefulness of this “ghost in the machine” concept is to accurately describe the
physical body for what it really is: a temporary “residence” for the gandhabba. The “residence”
decays with time and finally dies and then the gandhabba needs to find a new “residence”. The
gandhabba derives its uniqueness or the “personality” via sansāric habits (gati and āsavas), and
the gandhabba has the power to change those habits; see, “Habits, Goals, and Character
(Gathi)“.
Further information can be found on several posts on the manomaya kāya and gati (or gathi). You
can do a keyword search using the “Search” button on the top right.
13. Here is a recent article by the philosopher Colin McGinn on the current theories on the “mind
body problem” (click to open the pdf):
WebLink: PDF file: All machine and no ghost - McGinn-2012
§ Also see, Thomas Nagel’s book: “Mind & Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian
Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False” (2012).
§ Obviously, both of them have had no exposure to Buddha Dhamma. But I am very much
impressed that they have came to the conclusion that mind MUST play a central role.
14. A gandhabba with a fine body cannot “seen” with our eyes, because they are “more energy that
matter”. It is possible that the entities detected by “ghost detectors” are such gandhabbas.
§ There are “ghost detector” apps made by many software companies that can detect “ghosts”; if
you Google, “ghost detector” you can explore more on that. Even though right now this is done
mostly for fun, it will be shown to be correct concept in the future. These detectors detect
“packets of energy” that we cannot see with our eyes.
§ Whether these ghost detectors actually can detect gandhabbas or not I am not sure. But the
concept matches what is described in the Tipiṭaka.
July 14, 2019: I recently started a new subsection, “Origin of Life” to point out that not only the
mental body (gandhabba), but also the physical body (which is a vast collection of cells), have their
origins in the mind.
12.5.5 Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body
Revised April 20, 2016; July 31, 2017; September 6, 2019
Introduction
1. Manomaya kāya means a “mental body”. We should not perceive the “mental body” in the same
way as the physical body of ours. The mental body is mostly energy than matter. It is called a “body”
more in the sense of a “collection”, as in a “body of water” or a “body of evidence.”
§ The Pāli term for a physical body is āhāraja kāya or karaja kāya.
§ The mental body or “manomaya kāya” is also called gandhabba kāya or simply gandhabba.
The manomaya kāya is made of three parts called utuja, kammaja, cittaja.
2. Therefore, we have four types of bodies (kāya): āhāraja, utuja, kammaja, cittaja. The āhāraja
kāya is the physical body. The other three are parts of our “mental body,” the gandhabba.
§ It is easy to visualize a “person” to be consisting of two overlapping bodies. Those are the
physical body that we see and the gandhabba with a light body (it is not a body in a sense we
are used to but more like a “misty ghost”). The fine body of the gandhabba “overlaps” the
physical body.
§ The gandhabba makes the physical body “alive.” Without it, the physical body is like a piece of
wood and is inert. If you touch a dead body you will feel the difference compared to touching a
live person.
§ The dead body can be compared to a metal wire without a current flowing through it. When a
current flows the wire, it becomes “energized.”
§ In the Tirokudda Sutta in the Khuddaka Nikāya, gandhabba is called a “tirokudda.”
3. The physical body (karaja kāya) that we see is built from the food we eat (āhāraja kāya). Starting
with a single cell (zygote) in the womb, it grows by taking in food from the mother.
§ The gandhabba consists of the other three kāya: kammaja, cittaja, utuja.
§ Under stressful conditions (or with abhiññā powers), the misty gandhabba can come out of the
physical body, and the physical body is no longer under the control of the gandhabba. But it is
not dead because the jīvitindriya that maintains life is still there.
§ Only at death, both the gandhabba and the jīvitindriya leave, and the body becomes inert like a
log.
Kammaja Kāya is Primary
4. Let us follow the time sequence of making a gandhabba and a physical body in a new bhava. That
happens via several steps per Tipitaka: “jāti sañjāti okkanti abhinibbatti khandhānaṃ pātubhāvo
āyatanānaṃ paṭilābho.” See, “WebLink: suttacentral: Vibhaṅga Sutta (SN 12.2).”
The basis of all the other four kāya is the kammaja kāya; it arises from the kamma seed responsible
that particular bhava or existence at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment.
§ A kammaja kāya has three components called “dasaka” or “ten units”. Those ten units are eight
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] and modes of rotation and spin. The three components are vatthu
dasaka (hadaya vatthu or the seat of mind), kāya dasaka (blueprint of the final human body),
and the bhava dasaka. The latter is loosely translated as man/woman nature, but it encompasses
many other features related to one’s gati or bhava).
§ More details at “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]” and “Gandhabba – Only
in Human and Animal Realms.”
§ The formation of the kammaja kāya is called “jāti” moment of birth.
5. Immediately following its birth, that kammaja kāya gives rise to a thought stream (cittaja kāya).
§ Both kammaja and cittaja kāya start producing fine rūpa and immediately give rise to a very
light physical form called the utuja kāya. At this stage, cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, and jivhā dasaka
are also present. That is called the “sanjāti” moment of birth.
§ This subtle body with three kāya (kammaja, cittaja, utuja) is a gandhabba. Since all three types
of kāya have their origin in mind, the gandhabba is a “mind-made body” or a manomaya kāya.
But soon it will acquire a faint physical body by inhaling aroma (gandha + abbha), thus the
name gandhabba. Therefore a gandhabba would have all four “bodies” (kammaja, cittaja,
utuja, karaja).
§ The five sets of dasaka (kāya, cakkhu, sota, ghāṇa, and jivhā) arrange around the hadaya
vatthu (vatthu dasaka) in the subtle or “misty” body of the gandhabba. This gandhabba may
exist in that state for a long time waiting for a suitable womb.
§ That manomaya kāya or the gandhabba will now have to wait for a suitable womb to enter.
That could take months or years.
Gandhabba Descending to a Womb
6. When a suitable womb becomes available, this fine gandhabba enters the uterus. At that time, it
collapses to the size smaller than a single cell and merges with the single cell (zygote) formed by the
union of mother and father. This moment of entering a womb is called the “okkanti moment” of birth.
§ The physical body (karaja kāya) results from that single cell (zygote). It grows first by
extracting food from the mother’s womb and then consuming regular food once born as a baby.
§ The physical body grows according to the “blueprint” in the subtle body of the gandhabba. The
subtle body of the gandhabba expands with it so that it overlaps the physical body. For
example, there is a nervous system in the gandhabba that overlays the physical nervous system.
§ The initial growth stage of the fetus inside the womb is the “abhinibbatti stage” of birth.
7. Then the fetus inside the womb starts developing and forms the physical senses and the brain over
many weeks. During this time, the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, as well as the nervous system grow.
Furthermore, the brain develops too. It will have processing units to analyze signals from those five
physical senses.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, the cakkhu indriya is NOT just eyes, but also includes the associated
processing centers in the brain. Similarly for the other four indriya: sota, ghāṇa, jivhā, and
kāya.
§ Signals generated in these five indriya get to the five pasāda rūpa located around the hadaya
vatthu (seat of the mind) as described in “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)- Introduction.”
§ The “khandhānan pātilābho” stage of birth is complete with the formation of all six sense
faculties.
§ When that baby is born (i.e., comes out of the womb), that physical body can use all six
āyatana (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and the mind) to interact with the external world fully.
That is the final stage of the birth process: “āyatanan pātilābho.”
§ A better description of āyatana at “Contact Between Āyatana Leads to Vipāka Viññāṇa.”
8. Ven. Sariputta discussed that sequence of events when he analyzed the Dhammacakka Pavattana
Sutta in detail to the bhikkhus in the WebLink: suttacentral: Sacca Vibhanga Sutta (Majjhima Nikaya
141): “Katamā cāvuso, jāti? Yā tesaṃ tesaṃ sattānaṃ tamhi tamhi sattanikāye jāti sañjāti okkanti
abhinibbatti khandhānaṃ pātubhāvo āyatanānaṃ paṭilābho, ayaṃ vuccatāvuso: ‘jāti.’”
§ Those who do not believe in the gandhabba state (i.e., a gandhabba) need to contemplate hat
point. The gandhabba state is there only in human and animal realms.
§ At death, if that human bhava has more kammic energy left, the gandhabba comes out of the
dead physical body and waits for a new womb.
§ If kammic energy for the human bhava is exhausted, then a cuti-paṭisandhi transition takes
place, and the above discussed time sequence repeated. A brand new gandhabba in a new
bhava emerges from the dead body. For a technical analysis of this process, see, “Cuti-
Paṭisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description.”
The Manomaya Kāya
9. We can get an idea of the fineness of the manomaya kāya from the following comparison. The
average human weighs about 70 kg (70,000g) and has a body volume of about 70 L; the Density of a
typical fog (that we can barely see) is approximately 0.1 g per cubic meter. Thus the weight “of the
fog of volume equivalent of a human body” is about 0.01g.
§ Thus a “human body made of fog” weighs only a tiny fraction of the average human weight.
§ For another comparison, the weight of a mustard seed is about 0.002g.
§ A gandhabba would have a “misty body” like a human figure made of fog, but will be MUCH
SMALLER weight; it is immeasurable small. Sexual intercourse between a man and woman
creates a zygote (a human cell) in the womb. Then a gandhabba descends to the uterus and
takes hold of the zygote; see, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth
Control?.”
§ My late Noble teacher, Waharaka Thero, has seen how a gandhabba enters a womb. When
getting closer to the mother, gandhabba rotates rapidly and loses all its body other than the
hadaya vatthu, jīvitindriya, and bhava dasaka. So it becomes much smaller than an atom in
modern science (at the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] level). That tiny body (which would not
be seen even by the most powerful microscope) is pulled into the womb through the mother’s
body and gets attached to the zygote in the womb. I heard him describe this in a desana.
§ So, a human body starts basically with two cells from the mother and father (which make the
zygote) and an even smaller gandhabba. Thus virtually all the weight of a human comes from
the nutrients. First from the mother’s body, and once comes out the womb from the food that it
consumes.
10. We can easily see the role of the manomaya kāya with the actions by its three components:
§ Kammaja kāya is the most important. It is the blueprint for that existence (bhava). It has the
blueprint of the physical body too.
§ Cittaja kāya is what we EXPERIENCE moment-to-moment. We see, hear, smell, taste, touch,
and think about concepts with thoughts: cakkhu, sota, gandha, rasa, phoṭṭhabba, and mano
viññāṇa.
§ Those thoughts NORMALLY depend on our habits (gati), āsava (cravings), and kamma
vipāka, all in the kammaja kāya; see, “What is Mind? How Do We Experience the Outside
World?.”
§ If thoughts arise ONLY DUE TO our past kamma and the habits and cravings acquired through
them, then kamma would be deterministic. And we will be like robots (and that is the case for
many beings, like animals). LUCKILY, we can THINK on our own (unlike animals), and
change our destinies.
11. That last sentence summarizes the message of the Buddha. Do not lose this opportunity to get out
of this sansāric suffering when we have this precious human life, which will last only about 100
years.
§ Even if we are reborn human, what guarantees are there that we will get to listen or read about
Buddha Dhamma?
12. If anything is “transferred” from one existence (bhava) to another, those would be the “gati” and
“āsavā” of that life-stream. But they also keep evolving. If we do not act mindfully, we let our mind
to “go with the flow.” Then our actions will be determined by our sansāric habits. That would only
further strengthen such habits. That is why it is essential to identify bad habits and get rid of them,
and ALSO to cultivate good habits.
§ That is the process of mind purification called Bhāvanā (Meditation) detailed in Satipaṭṭhāna
(see, “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta”), Ānāpāna sati (“6. Ānāpānasati Bhāvanā (Introduction)”). I
have also written about the Sabbāsava sutta: “Habits and Goals,” and a bit more in-depth
analysis in “Key Points in the Sabbāsava Sutta” at the end of the post, “The Sotāpanna Stage.”
§ Also, see the post, “The Importance of Purifying the Mind.”
15. Thus it is clear that both the physical body and manomaya kāya make “quantum jumps” (large
instantaneous change) when switching from one existence (say an animal) to another (say a human).
§ The kammaja kāya has all the kammic potentialities (kamma seeds) acquired up to any given
time; see, “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka,” and “Sansāric Habits and
Āsavas.” But one of those seeds becomes operative for the “new bhava,” and becomes the
“bhavaṅga” for that life. The remaining kamma seeds all “tag-along” in the new bhava and one
of those will rise to the next bhava or existence; the same “gati” are in all seeds. Thus, whether
an animal or a human, the new life will display somewhat similar habits (gati) and cravings
(āsavā).
§ That is why “no-self” was not approved or rejected by the Buddha: the new life is not the same
as the old life. But it is not completely different either, because those gati and āsavā propagate
(but they all keep changing too). And similarly, the Buddha neither approved or rejected the
idea of a “self.”
§ A living being is a “life-stream” that changes even moment-to-moment based on cause and
effect: paṭicca samuppāda. Even though there is no “unchanging entity” such as a “soul,” the
life-stream has its characteristics (gati and āsavā), which also keep evolving.
More on the Manomaya kāya at: “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE).”
Next, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?”, ………..
12.5.6 Brain – Interface between Mind and Body
§ Since a given physical body has a lifetime of around 100 years, we have to “build a new
physical body” when the current one decays and finally dies. (That is if we have extra kammic
energy for the human bhava); see, “Bhava and Jāti – States of Existence and Births Therein.”
3. Before entering the mother’s womb, the gandhabba has a very fine “body.” Thus, it cannot
experience taste or touch, even though some can “digest odors” and become a bit denser.
§ A gandhabba waiting for a womb is usually about the size of the fully-grown human, but is so
fine that it is not visible to us. At the moment of “okkanthi” or entering the mother’s womb,
he/she will enter THROUGH the mother’s body and collapse to the size of the zygote when
taking possession of it; see, “What does Buddha Dhamma (Buddhism) say about Birth Control?
.”
§ Thus a gandhabba, when outside waiting for a suitable womb, is just like a ghost shown in the
movies. Of course, a human cannot see it even using technological advances. It is much smaller
in mass than the first cell formed by the union of the mother and father, the zygote.
§ The physical body grows starting with that single cell (zygote) using the nutrition from the
mother, and once outside the womb, it grows to the full size by consuming food.
§ Thus it is useful to have this visual, where a very fine gandhabba trapped inside physical body
of over a hundred pounds controls it.
Brain – Interface Between the Physical Body and Gandhabba
4. Once inside a physical body, gandhabba has to use the physical body to interact with the outside
world. It is like being trapped in a solid shell. Initially, its mind will be in the bhavaṅga state (see,
“Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs”) and will not be conscious about its environment, except
for body sensations.
§ In a human, the brain first processes the signals coming through the “physical senses” (eyes,
ears, etc.). The brain transmits the information to the five pasāda rūpa located in the
gandhabba. Those pasāda rūpa then pass that information to the hadaya vatthu (seat of the
mind) in the gandhabba; see, “Gandhabba (Manomaya Kāya)- Introduction.”
§ That is how our minds receive information from the external world.
§ Now the question arises: “How do the sense inputs coming through the eyes, ears, tongue, nose,
and the body, are transmitted to the pasada rūpa located close to the hadaya vatthu?.” Note
that the hadaya vatthu overlaps the physical heart.
5. It is the brain that acts as the intermediary between those physical sense inputs and the five pasada
rūpa. It processes the incoming information to a form that can be understood by the mind (hadaya
vatthu).
§ First, the sense inputs coming in to the physical body through the eyes, ears, tongue, nose, and
the body, are transmitted to specific regions of the brain. This has been well-researched by the
scientists over the past hundred years. The following figure shows the specific areas of the
brain that analyze the data from the five senses.
§ Science is unable to explain how the mind comprehends the corresponding signals. For
example, in vision, there is no “picture” formed in the back of the head; see, “On Intelligence”
by Jeff Hawkins (2005) for a helpful discussion.
6. The signals for vision, sounds, smells, and taste come into the body through specific body parts. In
contrast, the touch sensations can come from anywhere in the body, and conveyed via an intricate
system of nerves:
§ These nerve signals go to the brain for processing (see the “touch and pressure” processing area
in the figure in #5 above).
Gandhabba (Mental Body) Overlaps the Physical Body
7. By the way, it is essential to note that the misty gandhabba has a similar “nervous system”
that overlaps the physical nervous system shown above (Yes. that is extremely fine). This is not
entirely relevant to the present discussion, but it is there to impart kamma vipāka via the physical
body:
§ The physical nervous system has to align with the nervous system of the gandhabba. That
alignment could change (due to kamma vipāka), which makes our body’s nervous system to go
out-of-alignment for proper body function leading to aches and pains. See, #6 of “11. Magga
Phala and Ariya Jhānas via Cultivation of Saptha Bojjanga.”
8. The signals from the other four senses are also directed to specific brain areas (indicated in the
figure in #5 above) via specialized neural pathways. For example, the visual signals from the eyes is
shown shown below:
§ Once the brain processes those sensory inputs from the five physical senses, they are
“transmitted” to the corresponding five pasāda rūpa in the gandhabba (manomaya kāya). That
is discussed below.
Mana Indriya in the Brain
9. So far we have identified five of gandhabba‘s “windows to the outside world” from his/her “shell”
or the physical body: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and the body.
§ What about the “dhamma” that are the finest rūpa (these are called mano rūpa) that interact
with the physical body? That is how we think about “random things” out of the blue. For
example, we may be washing dishes in the kitchen, and all of a sudden, thoughts about a friend
or a relative may come to the mind.
§ Thoughts about a friend — who may be thousand miles away — comes through the mana
indriya in the head (inside the brain). Of course, science is not aware of that.
§ We discussed this in a previous post: “What are Dhamma? – A Deeper Analysis.”
10. So, how do the signals processed in the brain due to incoming vision, sound, smell, taste, touch,
and dhamma are passed to the five pasāda rūpa and the hadaya vatthu? Detail in “Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya)- Introduction.”
§ It is well-known that there are electromagnetic brain waves of different types (alpha, beta,
theta, and gamma). I will write a post on this in the future. These waves are called “kirana” in
the Tipiṭaka.
The Origin of Citta Vīthi
11. When information comes to one of the five pasāda rūpa, it passes on that signal to the hadaya
vatthu by impinging (hitting) the hadaya vatthu. That results in the hadaya vatthu vibrating 17 times,
just like a clamped blade vibrates a certain number of times when hit by an object; see, “Gandhabba
(Manomaya Kāya) – Introduction” and “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs.”
§ That is the origin of a citta vīthi of 17 citta. Each citta in a citta vīthi corresponds to a single
vibration of hadaya vatthu. This 17 thought-moment time period is the lifetime of a hadaya
rūpa ( vibrational energy) of the hadaya vatthu.
§ It is a common mistake to take this to mean that any rūpa has a lifetime of 17 thought
moments. That is a terrible mistake; see, “Does any Object (Rūpa) Last only 17 Thought
Moments?.”
§ It is not possible to describe these details in one or even several posts. One may need to look
through other posts to clarify some concepts. The “Search” button on the top right is an
excellent resource for this task.
12. While one of the five pasāda rūpa has to strike the hadaya vatthu to pass on its signals, signals
from the mana indriya can exchange information with the hadaya vatthu directly.
§ When the mana indriya interacts with the hadaya vatthu, that also results in citta vīthi.
Manodvāra citta vīthi do not have a fixed length.
§ Still only one of the six sense-signal can be in contact with the hadaya vatthu at a given time.
But since the process is swift, billions of citta vīthi can run through the hadaya vatthu “in the
blink of an eye”.
Two Inter-Dependent “Bodies”
13. Therefore, this whole process is best visualized as an interaction between two overlapping
systems. The physical body and the corresponding subtle body of the gandhabba.
§ When the gandhabba escapes from the body under stressful situations, it can float above the
physical body, and physical body. Then the physical body becomes inert until the gandhabba
returns to it; see, “Manomaya Kāya and Out-of-Body Experience (OBE).”
14. Thus it is clear that the brain plays a significant role in shaping our future. Similarly, the five
physical senses play vital roles too.
§ If one of the five physical senses are damaged, we lose the corresponding “window to the
external world”. We will not be able to see if both eyes are damaged. If the sensors inside the
ears go bad, we will not be able to hear, etc.
§ But the most critical is, of course, the brain. If the brain is damaged, sensory signals cannot be
processed, and we will not be able to interact with the external world. Thus, being brain dead is
virtually equivalent to being dead.
§ However, if one’s brain becomes damaged due to an accident, for example, it will not affect
the gandhabba inside. It is just that the gandhabba will not be able to communicate with the
external world. And if damage to the brain results in the death of the physical body,
the gandhabba will just come out of the dead body and will wait for a suitable womb.
Next Existence Determined by Gati and Kamma Vipāka
15. It does not matter whether one gets killed due to an accident or dies due to an illness or old age.
The gandhabba’s future is determined by his/her gati (or gathi), past kamma (kamma bija), etc.
§ If one is killed in an accident, the gandhabba will immediately be kicked out of the dead body.
Then will wait for a suitable womb, if there is still more kammic energy left for the human
bhava (in an accident, that is likely).
§ But if one gets to old age and dies or dies due to illness — and if one has exhausted kammic
energy for the human bhava — then the cuti-paṭisandhi will happen at that time. If one is to
become a deva, a deva will appear instantaneously in the corresponding deva world. If one is to
become an animal, an animal gandhabba will emerge from the dead body and will have to wait
for a suitable womb to become available.
16. It is also clear why we need to take good care of the body, our sense faculties, and of course our
brains. Gandhabba’s (our) ability to make decisions depends on all those faculties working in
optimum condition.
§ We have a very short time of around 100 years to get rid of our bad (immoral) gati, cultivate
good (moral) gati, and comprehend the real nature of this world (anicca, dukkha, anatta), and
be free from future suffering.
§ We need to try to get to the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna and be free from the four lowest
realms (apāyas). At least, we need to make progress towards that goal so that in a future life we
will have a tihetuka birth that makes it easier to attain Nibbāna.
§ In order to accomplish those things, we need to eat well, exercise well, and take care of our
bodies to perform optimally. It is also necessary to stay away from drugs and alcohol and also
associate with those who have similar goals (and stay away from those with bad habits).
If you have not read the post, “Manomaya Kāya (Gandhabba) and the Physical Body“, you may want
to read that before reading this post.
1. One could visualize the manomaya kāya or the “mental body” as the “life giving energy field” (it
has some fine rūpa too) overlapping the solid physical body. The working mind, cittaja kaya
(thought stream) is in the manomaya kāya, and it is associated with a very fine rūpa called
hadaya vatthu, and that is where the thoughts arise.
2. When the manomaya kāya is attached to the physical body, thoughts are generated in a mechanism
that involve both the hadaya vatthu and the brain (together with the nervous system in the physical
body). This is why the “thinking ability” degenerates as one gets old. However, the hadaya vatthu
does not overlap the brain; it overlaps the physical heart.
§ Brain is a part of the physical body and is the interface between the physical body and the
mental body (manomaya kāya).
3. Not only the mind, but the other five “internal senses” (pasada rūpa) are born with the manomaya
kāya at the time of rebirth (paṭisandhi). And all these are very fine rūpa, that our eyes cannot see.
Thus one can visualize the manomaya kāya as an “energy field” that overlaps the physical body and
provides the vitality to the inert physical body.
§ The Buddha compared the situation of a manomaya kāya separating from the physical body to a
sword pulled out of its sheath, or a snake shedding its skin. Once the manomaya kāya comes
out, the body is like an inert log. And that is exactly what happens when one dies; the vitality is
gone the instant the manomaya kāya comes out.
4. This manomaya kaya of a human (or an animal) is called “gandhabba“. When a person dies, if
he/she has more kammic energy left in the human “bhava“, then the gandhabba just comes out of the
dead body.
§ Until a suitable womb is found matching its kamma seeds (“gathi“), the gandhabba may stay in
that form for even years.
5. The gandhabba also has the ability to see and hear, actually with much more flexibility; the
capabilities of the eye and ear pasada rūpa are diminished when working with physical eye and
physical ear.
§ Of course the gandhabba does not have touch, taste, and for the most part smell sensations,
because its body is so fine.
§ When the manomaya kāya is separated from the physical body, “seeing” does not need light
(one could look at things far away) and “hearing” does not need air as a medium for the sound
to propagate (one could hear things far away). Both those are done via “kirana” (or “rays” in
English; similar to electromagnetic radiation). Furthermore, the gandhabba can “travel” very
fast; it is not physical travel. For example, the suttas talk about the Buddha or Arahants with
iddhi powers travelling to deva loka in a time comparable to the time taken to “stretch a bent
arm”.
6. When the manomaya kāya (gandhabba) is merged with the physical body, “seeing” and “hearing”
is also done with the help of the physical eye and the physical ear. It is like being inside a military
tank and using the sensors mounted on the tank to see and hear what is going on outside.
§ Now, “seeing” is done with the help of the physical eye: the “eye” (eye indriya) of the
manomaya kāya is well inside the physical eye, and objects are “seen” through the physical
eye. Same with the ear. Thus, eyes and ears can be thought of as those sensors mounted on that
military tank.
§ Therefore, the ability to see and hear also degrade with old age, as the physical eyes and
physical ears age.
§ The brain is like the computer in that tank that processes the information coming in through the
sensors.
§ Therefore, if any of these three “physical instruments” (brain, eyes, ears) gets damaged, the
ability to think, see, or hear can be degraded or lost.
7. However, most of the abilities of the eye and ear are still due to the two pasada rūpa (internal eye
and internal ear) associated with the manomaya kāya.
For example, have you ever wondered how we can judge the distances as we move around avoiding
bumping in to things and each other? The physical eye does not have the capability to “judge
distances”; see, “The Sense of Being Stared At” by Rupert Sheldrake (2003, p.12). Our eyes can see
many things at the same time and judge relative distances of all things. This ability is in the pasada
rūpa, and not in the eyes or the brain.
8. Gandhabba cannot smell, taste, or touch, because its body is very fine and thus no physical contact
can be made. But it has a way of taking energy form “gandha” (aroma) and that is why it is called
gandhabba (“gandha“+ “abba“, where “abba” means taking in).
9. The hadaya vatthu of the manomaya kāya (gandhabba) overlaps the physical heart when the two
bodies are together. However, in some situations the manomaya kāya can separate from the physical
body, and that is what is called the “out-of-body experience (OBE)”.
§ Normally, it happens under stressful conditions (e.g., what people refer to as near death
experiences (NDE) or when undergoing operations), but there are some cases, where people
seem to be able to do it at will.
§ A recent book, “Dying to be me: My Journey from Cancer, to Near Death, to True Healing”, by
Anita Moorjani (2012), describes the OBE experience of her in detail.
§ In his book, “Travels”, famous author of the Jurassic Park, Michael Crichton (1988, p. 307)
mentions his ability to “shift my awareness out of my body and move it around the bedroom”,
and he says, “..I didn’t think anything about it… I assumed that anybody could do it..”.
§ A similar account has been given by a woman recently who also thought that “everybody could
do it”: WebLink: ABCNEWS: Woman Has 'Out of Body' Experiences Whenever She Wants
§ Of course there are many books written on OBE. “Consciousness Beyond Life”, by Pim van
Lommel (2010) gives detailed accounts of case studies of OBE experienced by people
undergoing heart operations.
§ A series of books, including “Journeys out of the Body”, have been written by Robert A.
Monroe based on his experiences.
Next, “Gathi (Character), Anusaya (Latent Defilements), and Āsava (Cravings)“, ……….
12.5.8 Cuti-Patisandhi – An Abhidhamma Description
1. Many people believe that paṭisandhi or the linking to a new life happens in a womb (in human and
animal realms). But that is not correct. Patisandhi citta is experienced in the next very citta after the
cuti citta of the old life in the last citta vīthi of the dying person.
§ The new life form (gandhabba) emerges from the dead body right after the last citta vīthi
(However, if the next life is an opapatika one, the life form is fully formed right after the last
citta vīthi). This is also called the gandhabba state. Here we will discuss the case where the
new life is either human or animal and thus a gandhabba is formed; see, “Manomaya Kāya and
Physical Body” and “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for the Manomaya Kāya?“.
2. Patisandhi (“pati” is bond and “sandhi” is joining in Pāli or Sinhala, thus paṭisandhi means joining
a new life at the end of the old) happens in a thought moment in the body of the dying person; if the
next life is human or animal, then the gandhabba for that life comes out of that body at the end of that
last citta vīthi. Of course the gandhabba has a very fine body, and it can be seen only by a person
with abhiññā powers. let us discuss this step carefully.
§ I must warn in advance that this analysis is highly technical, and is suitable only for those who
are familiar with citta vīthi processes in Abhidhamma. However, the conclusions are
informative, so you may want to go through it. Citta vīthi and cetasika are discussed in
several posts in Citta and Cetasika.
3. The last citta vīthi of the old life with 17 citta run in the standard way: atita bhavaṅga, bhavaṅga
calana, bhavaṅga upacceda, pancadvara vajjana, cakkhu viññāṇa, sampaticcana, santirana,
vottapana, and then javana sequence (7 javana citta) starts. After the fifth javana citta, there are two
more javana citta left. The sixth is the cuti citta and the seventh and last javana is the paṭisandhi
citta.
§ In the last citta vīthi, a previous kamma vipāka provides an arammana (thought object)
associated with that kamma vipāka through one of the five sense doors: it is normally a visual
or a sound associated with the new existence (bhava). Even though the person’s physical
faculties may be very weak, the person will see or hear very clearly whatever the nimitta
presented by the kamma vipāka. Then at the vottapana citta, the mind makes a decision to act
on that arammana based on the person’s gathi. The person has no control of it. It is called,
“kammaja pure jatha; cittaja pacce jatha”, i.e., kamma vipāka comes first, and then
accordingly the javana citta flow grasping that new bhava:
“kamma vipāka vajjanti, vipako kamma sambhavo
Tasma punabbhovo hoti, evan loko pavattati”
Or,
“kamma vipāka presents a new existence, the ignorant being grasps that existence
Thus the cycle of rebirths repeats, and that is how the world exists”
4. First there is the vipāka citta; then it induces kamma sambhava. “Vipako kamma sambhavo” is
initiated at the vottapana citta. The vottapana citta decides how to proceed with the arammana
(object) that came from the kamma vipāka, and the being normally gets attached to that object via
greed/hate and grasps a new existence in the javana citta that follow. Thus “vipako kamma
sambhavo” starts with the first javana citta. After 5 javana citta kammic energy is optimized, with
each subsequent javana strengthening via asevana paccayā from the previous javana. The sixth one
is called cuti citta, and the next citta grasps the new bhava.
§ Cuti citta happens in the last citta vīthi just after the actual cuti (death), because it is pacce jata
to kammaja cuti event. The seventh javana always is responsible for the next life.
§ Now this linking to the next life happens at the 7th javana citta or the paṭisandhi citta, which is
again pacce jatha to the actual kammaja paṭisandhi that starts at the pancdvaravajjana citta in
this last citta vīthi.
5. Now let us take a look at the last citta vīthi of the old life in detail. This citta vīthi was started by
the last bit of kammic energy from the old life, and it will run its course of 17 citta before it comes to
an end. It is like throwing a stone; even though the energy was fully spent by the time the stone was
released, the stone will be travelling until its energy is all spent. In the same way, even though the
kammic energy for the old life has ended, the last citta vīthi will run its course of 17 citta including
the last two bhavaṅga citta after the 7 javana citta.
§ Cuti or death is not a citta; it is the end of the kammic energy of the old life. Cuti happens just
at the moment of initiating the last citta vīthi, and the cuti citta is in the last citta vīthi.
Patisandhi is not a citta either. It is also kammaja act.
§ Here the old bhavaṅga has ended too; but there are two bhavaṅga citta left in the last citta vīthi.
The new vatthu rūpa cannot be formed until this last citta vīthi is done with, because as soon as
one is formed, it will start its citta vīthi, and no two vīthi can be there at the same time.
6. In that last citta vīthi, by the time atita bhavaṅga, bhavaṅga calana, and comes to bhavaṅga
upacceda, the kammic vipāka from the old life are finished. Now what comes to the pancadvara is
the kamma nimitta, asanna kamma, or a gathi nimitta; it is the vipāka citta that powers the new
life: “kamma vipāka vajjanti”. It is received by the sampaticcana, santirana citta and then “vipāka
kamma sambhavo” happens at the vottapana citta, i.e., a decision is made on what to do and this
decision depends on the level of avijjā (in the form of one’s gathi and āsavas).
§ This “vipāka kamma sambhavo” starts with the first javana citta and builds up gradually up to
the fifth javana citta. Now the sixth javana, cuti citta, had been determined from the beginning
of the citta vīthi. The new kamma beeja starts working at the seventh javana in the new bhava.
7. When this last citta vīthi ends, the old hadaya vatthu is dead too; it had exhausted all its kammic
power. The next citta vīthi starts with a new hadaya vatthu in the new life that is powered by a new
kamma beeja. The new hadaya vatthu if formed by the new kamma seed that was grasped at the 7th
javana (the paṭisandhi citta), and immediately the first citta vīthi for the new life starts. The
gandhabba is formed and comes out of the dead body.
§ If a human died and the next life is an animal, the gandhabba with the corresponding animal
figure comes out fully formed (of course it is very fine); It is the blueprint for the new
physical body.
§ This gandhabba now has to wait for a suitable womb. It is not that gandhabba decides which
womb is good; rather, when a womb that matches the gathi of the gandhabba becomes
available, gandhabba will be pulled into it by the kammic energy.
§ When a sperm fertilizes an egg in a womb, a single cell called a zygote results. But there is no
life there until the gandhabba enters the womb and is incorporated with that zygote. Now the
zygote becomes an embryo, then a fetus, and once out of the womb grows to a full-size human
or an animal according to that blueprint.
§ Science has been unable to explain how all the complex body parts of a human or animal
develops starting from a single cell. This is how it happens. The blueprint for all the complex
body parts is in the gandhabba, not in that single cell; see, “What does Buddha Dhamma
(Buddhism) say about Birth Control?“.
§ And this is not restricted to any particular religion. I know many “Buddhists” who enjoy fishing
and hunting. On the other hand, most “Buddhists” consider drinking to be immoral, even
though “drinking” per se is not one of the dasa akusala (of course excessive drinking can
induce one to do immoral things). It just depends on what “diṭṭhis” one has.
§ In parts of India, some people believe that washing in a particular river will help “wash away”
bad merits. But then the fish in that river should be completely devoid of any bad merits, since
they live their whole lives in water. Even such “apparently harmless” wrong visions still cover
the mind, and prevent the mind from seeing the reality.
§ The problem is that most such diṭṭhis propagate from generation to generation without people
actually examining the sense of such beliefs.
5. Diṭṭhi is one of the key immoral cetasika (mental factors), and the opposite sammā diṭṭhi or paññā
(wisdom) is of course a “moral cetasika“.
§ A key point about cetasika is that moral and immoral cetasika DO NOT arise together in a
citta. A thought is either moral OR immoral. A moral thought has one or more of “moral
cetasika” such as alobha, adosa, compassion, etc. and an immoral thought has one or more of
immoral cetasika such as lobha, dosa, shamelessness, fearlessness of wrong, etc.
6. The cetasika “pīti” (pronounced “peethi” or “preethi”) which means “joy” is one that can be
associated with either a kusala or akusala thought. The same thing is true for the cetasikas chanda
(liking) and viriya (effort). These three cetasika are included in the six types of cetasika called
“particulars” that can be in either type of thought, kusala or akusala; see, “Cetasika (Mental
Factors)“.
§ Thus if one does not believe that killing fish or other animals is immoral and can lead to bad
results in future lives, then a person with that diṭṭhi can enjoy fishing/hunting (pīti), can form a
liking for it (chanda), and enthusiastically make preparations for fishing/hunting trips (viriya).
§ On the other hand, someone with sammā diṭṭhi will definitely feel at least uncomfortable in
doing such an act, will not like it, and will not strive to do such acts. He/she will gain joy by
doing things with thoughts that have only moral cetasika, and also may have chanda and viriya
associated with such activities.
7. Thus there are many types of “micchā diṭṭhi” that tend to make people comfortable with immoral
acts.
§ It must be noted that the word “diṭṭhi” is used in Buddha Dhamma to specifically denote
micchā diṭṭhi or “wrong vision”. The opposite is sammā diṭṭhi or paññā (wisdom).
§ Some people do not have a problem with killing other human beings if those are presumed to be
“non-believers”. They have been taught all their lives that it is “good thing to do” and will pave
the way to heaven.
§ It is amazing how one’s mind can be made to accept certain activities as “acceptable” by
conditioning over time, especially if started at young age. This is also called “brain washing”.
This is why diṭṭhis are very difficult to break. Yet, with a determined mindset, one can break
diṭṭhis.
§ The key is to critically evaluate both sides of the particular issue at hand. Does it make sense to
say one can go to heaven by killing people? Other than someone’s promise, is there any truth to
that statement? Is there a doctrine that EXPLAINS HOW “killing unbelievers can pave the way
to heaven?”.
§ The key problem is that human mind likes to “take the easy way”. It is easier to try to justify
one’s vision or position rather than trying to spend time looking deeper into the issue to make
an informed decision. But one needs to think about the consequences that can last for
unimaginably long times.
8. Some people just enjoy killing other people; serial killers are a good example. Such people have
extreme version of the moha cetasika; they are totally and completely morally blind.
§ While most of us cannot even fathom, “how can such a person go to sleep at night?” after
killing another person for fun, they actually sleep well with a content (but perverse) mind.
§ People like Pol Pot and Hitler planned systematic killing of millions of people for many years.
In their “diṭṭhi” that was the right thing to do, and many others started believing in that “diṭṭhi”
too.
9. This is why getting rid of “diṭṭhi” and embracing sammā diṭṭhi is the first step in the mundane
Eightfold Path first and then in lokuttara Eightfold Path; see, “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma?“.
§ Having wrong kinds of vision (diṭṭhi) can be very dangerous, since one may not even realize
that one is doing immoral things because of that diṭṭhi. Such diṭṭhis can only be removed via
learning Dhamma. One becomes a Sotāpanna just by eliminating such wrong visions and
perceptions. The three sanyojana (or samyojana) that are removed at the Sotāpanna stage
(sathkaya diṭṭhi, vicikicchā, silabbata paramasa) all arise due to micchā diṭṭhi.
10. When we analyze at the akusala citta we can see why. All immoral acts are done with just 12
types of akusala citta: eight based on lobha (greed), two based on paṭigha (dislike), and two based on
moha (ignorance).
§ All “apayagami” deeds (those acts responsible for rebirth in the four lowest realms or apāyas)
are done with the first four lobha citta and the vicikicchā citta; see, “Akusala Citta and Akusala
Vipāka Citta“.
§ Those first four akusala citta are “diṭṭhi sampayutta” or “done with wrong views”. The cetasika
vicikicchā also arises due to not knowing the true nature of the world, i.e., anicca, dukkha,
anatta. Thus all five akusala citta that are removed at the Sotāpanna stage arise due to micchā
diṭṭhi, wrong visions about the world.
11. If one believes one is not doing an immoral act while doing that immoral act, then he/she is
likely to do it with pīti, chanda, and viriya., i.e., with joy, liking, and makes effort joyfully to get it
done.
§ Of course ignorance of law is not an excuse, as stated in the latin phrase, Ignorantia juris non
excusat. It holds true for the natural laws stated in Buddha Dhamma as well.
§ Even worse, according to Buddha Dhamma, immoral acts done with joy are the worst. That is
why out of those first four lobha citta, those two done with joy are the absolutely worst: the
“somanassa sahagata diṭṭhi sampayutta citta” and the “somanassa sahagata diṭṭhi
sampayutta sasankharika citta“.
§ In English, these mean, “act done with joy and wrong vision due to gathi” and “act done
with joy and wrong vision prompted by other factors”. The first is the worst since it comes
automatically; the second citta arises after some deliberation, and thus has less potency, or
javana.
12. Therefore, now we can see why some people do immoral acts with joy and make them even
worse; they simply have wrong world views or diṭṭhi. This is why learning Dhamma is so
important.
§ As the Buddha said, “My Dhamma has never been known to the world before”. So, none of us
will know precisely what is moral or immoral, without hearing or reading about them.
§ However, as humans we have the innate sense of knowing roughly what is moral/immoral.
These come from our previous lives. But depending on the environment that we grew up,
we may have acquired certain “wrong visions” or “micchā diṭṭhi” or “diṭṭhi“.
§ This is why teaching children to be moral and making sure they associate with only “good
friends” is critical. Those habits learned at young age can last a lifetime unless changed via a
determined effort.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Abhidhamma 1175
§ And since one person’s diṭṭhi is different from another’s, it is absolutely critical to spend time
and verify which diṭṭhis are the wrong to be adhered to in the long term. Many people do not
believe in rebirth, but according to Buddha that is a micchā diṭṭhi that can lead to the adverse
outcomes in the future. One needs to examine the evidence and decide for oneself. In addition
to looking at , “Evidence for Rebirth“, one should also examine, “Vagaries of Life and the Way
to Seek “Good Rebirths”.
13. Finally, the reverse is true too: Those moral acts that are done with joy and knowledge (wisdom)
or “correct views” (sammā diṭṭhi) will lead to vipāka or outcomes with highest merits.
§ Getting rid of wrong views is acquiring correct views or cultivating sammā diṭṭhi. The more
one becomes knowledgeable in what is moral and what is not, one easily BECOMES joyful
while doing moral deeds; joy and wisdom feed on each other. Of course, chanda and viriya will
grow simultaneously too.
§ Thus the “somanassa sahagata ñāṇa sampayutta citta” or the “thought with joy and wisdom
that comes out automatically” is the strongest moral citta (or sobhana citta). The next highest is
the “somanassa sahagata ñāṇa sampayutta sasankharika citta” or the “thought with joy and
wisdom prompted by other factors”.
§ Here, wisdom starts at the mundane sammā diṭṭhi level, increases as one one embarks on the
Sotāpanna magga, then Sotāpanna phala, and so on until becoming “fully enlightened” at the
Arahant stage; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart“.
§ The power or javana of a kusala citta is enhanced with enhanced wisdom. Thus the power of a
citta of an Arahant is much stronger compared to that of a Sotāpanna, and that of a Sotāpanna
is much stronger compared to a normal person.
§ Of course the javana of a citta with strong ignorance (moha) is strong too, and thus makes the
deed even more potent and will bring about unbearably bad outcomes (vipāka).
14. Even though many people perceive Abhidhamma to be complex, if started with good basics,
Abhidhamma helps clarify many complex issues very clearly. Learning about types of citta and how
different cetasika play roles in one’s habits (“gathi“) will help clarify many issues.
Next, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental Power“, ………….
1. The attainment of the Sotāpanna stage accomplishes the first and foremost goal of a Bhauddhayā:
to remove the possibility of rebirth in the lowest four realms, where suffering is unbearable.
§ Even though I have analyzed different ways one can comprehend the “requirements” to be
fulfilled to attain the Sotāpanna stage (they are all equivalent), one way to easily remember
those requirements is to realize that a Sotāpanna has REMOVED two key immoral cetasika:
diṭṭhi and vicikicchā.
§ See, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)” and “Diṭṭhi (Wrong Views), Sammā Diṭṭhi (Good/Correct
Views)” for introductions to the types of cetasika or “mental factors” that highlight one’s
“gathi” in one’s thoughts.
2. Cetasika are inter-related. A good example is dosa (strong hate), which arises as a result of lobha
(strong greed); actually lobha TURNS to dosa, they do not arise together. When someone kills
another human, that is due to dosa; at the moment of the killing, only dosa was in that person’s mind.
But that dosa likely arose due to lobha, strong attachment to something at an earlier time.
§ And lobha is strong when diṭṭhi is strong. In the above example, one would not have formed
such strong lobha if one did not have diṭṭhi, and instead would have cultivated the moral
cetasika, sammā diṭṭhi, to some extent (i.e., if one knew the consequences of such a strong
attachment that can lead to hate and then killing). Thus when diṭṭhi is removed, lobha gets to
weaker strength of rāga (attachment to sense pleasures).
§ Removal of diṭṭhi also leads to the reduction of dosa (strong hate) to paṭigha (tendency to
get angry or irritable) .
§ Vicikicchā is related to moha; when vicikicchā is removed, moha (morally blind) is reduced
to avijjā (ignorance of anicca, dukkha, anatta) level. As discussed in another post, vicikicchā
is the tendency to do unfruitful and harmful things because of a “covered mind”, i.e., not
knowing the true nature.
§ Those two points are stated in another way by saying that the four “diṭṭhi sahagatha lobha
citta” and the “vicikicchā citta” are removed at the Sotāpanna stage (thus 5 of the 12 akusala
citta are removed at the Sotāpanna stage). This was discussed in the post, “Why Do People
Enjoy Immoral Deeds? – Diṭṭhi Is Key“.
3. In other posts I have discussed how one’s “gathi” are intimately linked to the kinds of cetasika that
dominate in one’s mind. The “apayagami gathi” or those habits or tendencies of a person that makes
the person eligible to born in the apāyas (the lowest four realms) are mainly in several key immoral
cetasika: lobha, dosa, diṭṭhi, moha, and vicikicchā.
§ At the Sotāpanna stage, the cetasaika of diṭṭhi and vicikicchā are REMOVED; then lobha is
reduced to rāga (which can be separated out as kāma rāga, rūpa rāga, arūpa rāga); dosa is
reduced to paṭigha, and moha reduced to avijjā.
§ At the Sakadāgāmī stage, from those remaining above, kāma rāga and paṭigha are REDUCED.
§ Those two, kāma rāga and paṭigha, are REMOVED at the Anāgāmī stage.
§ It is only at the Arahant stage that the remaining strength of those key immoral cetasika of
lobha and moha (i.e., rūpa rāga, arūpa rāga, avijjā) together with all other immoral cetasika
are removed.
4. As one sheds these immoral cetasika and thus “immoral gathi“, one automatically cultivates
“moral gathi” with moral cetasika. We saw above that when diṭṭhi diminishes, sammā diṭṭhi (which is
the same as the paññā or wisdom cetasika) grows.
§ In the same way, as vicikicchā is reduced, saddhā (faith) cetasika grows. This is why a
Sotāpanna has “unbreakable” faith (saddhā) in Buddha, Dhamma, and Saṅgha; vicikicchā has
been removed. However, that saddhā comes through not via blind faith, but via understanding.
§ Still, paying homage to Buddha, Dhamma, Saṅgha, via Tiratana vanadana or listening to pirith
helps build saddhā.; see, “Buddhist Chanting – Introduction“. This is why it is said that one
needs to cultivate saddhā and paññā together.
§ Another thing to remember is that while alobha (non-greed) and adosa (non-hate) are moral
cetasika opposing lobha and dosa, amoha is NOT actually a cetasika. Unlike alobha and
adosa, amoha is not cultivated; amoha is merely the absence of moha.
§ Instead, what is cultivated is paññā (wisdom) or the sammā diṭṭhi cetasika. And that requires
understanding of anicca, dukkha, anatta. This is why paññā (wisdom) has nothing to do with
“book knowledge”, but is all about comprehending the “true nature of this world of 31 realms”.
I will have another post on this important point.
5. Another illuminating way to analyze is to look at the removal of the āsavas at each stage. The four
types of āsavas are: ditthasava (āsava for diṭṭhi), kamasava (āsava for sense pleasures, almost the
same as kāma rāga), bhavasava (āsava for bhava or existence, which is almost the same as rūpa rāga
plus arūpa rāga), and avijjasava (āsava for ignorance). Of course “āsavakkhaya” or removal of all
āsavas is Nibbāna.
§ As we can see (by comparing with #3 above), ditthasava is removed at the Sotāpanna stage;
kamasava is reduced at the Sakadāgāmī stage and removed at the Anāgāmī stage; bhavasava
and avijjasava removed at the Arahant stage.
§ Thus we can also see that it is the combination of ditthasava and kamasava that give rise to
strong greed (lobha) and strong hate (dosa). When one loses ditthasava by comprehending the
true nature of this world, lobha and dosa are reduced to kāma rāga and paṭigha (which
constitute kamasava).
§ While such different analyses will be helpful for someone who has been studying them, all
these different terms could be confusing to those who are new to these terms. But one will get
used to these terms with time, and it is important to understand what they mean (not just to
memorize) in the long term. With usage, they WILL become familiar.
§ In the days of the Buddha, Buddha Dhamma was called “vibhangavādi” or “doctrine that
systematically analyzes by parts”. Just like medical students learn about the human body by
dissecting dead bodies, it is informative to look at the mind by analyzing it in different ways.
And all types of analyses are inter-consistent.
6. A Sotāpanna, by comprehending anicca, dukkha, anatta to a certain extent, REMOVES diṭṭhi
( i.e., achieves diṭṭhivisuddhi) and cultivates sammā diṭṭhi to a certain level. And when that happens,
the strength of the moha cetasika is reduced to just avijjā level, and also the vicikicchā cetasika is
REMOVED. Simultaneously, lobha is REDUCED to rāga, which then are removed in stages at
higher stages of Nibbāna as stated in #3 above.
§ The above paragraph briefly summarizes what happens at the Sotāpanna stage. It may seem
simple, but it requires lot of effort to discipline the mind to get to that stage, mostly via learning
and contemplating Dhamma.
§ One has reduced the strength of attachment to “worldly things” to the extent that one will NOT
do certain immoral actions no matter how much wealth or sense pleasure is at stake. One WILL
NOT act with vicikicchā: there is no hesitation in trying to decide, one KNOWS such an act
will lead to the birth in the apāyas. It is not something one has to think about at that moment; it
comes out AUTOMATICALLY, because of such “apayagami gathi” have been
PERMANENTLY removed.
§ Thus by getting to know some properties of key cetasika we can get an idea of how our minds
work, and get an idea why different people respond to the same external influences in different
ways. It is because their “gathi” or dominant cetasika are different.
7. Now let us take some examples. Diṭṭhi is at the forefront because one’s “views” determines what
one has gotten used to or one is comfortable with.
§ If we take the diṭṭhi (or view) that says if one bathes in a certain river one could wash away
one’s sins. This does not appear to be a strong diṭṭhi, but it is dangerous one: then one can do
all sorts of immoral deeds all day along and then take a bath to “wash away” all those sins and
thus get rid of any kamma vipāka. Yet, this diṭṭhi is something that has been carried from
generation to generation in parts of India.
§ Many people say, “I don’t do immoral things and even help out others, therefore, bad things
will not happen to me”. That is a diṭṭhi too, because that person does not realize that he/she
most certainly has done innumerable bad things in previous lives. That diṭṭhi therefore arises
due to not believing in rebirth. The “cause and effect” is a valid argument, but that
argument holds only within the broader world view, that this is not the only life we have
had.
8. There are several key diṭṭhis that are common in Buddhist countries.
§ Many “Buddhists” believe that taking and obeying the eight precepts on Full Moon days is
enough to attain Nibbāna. There are old ladies in Sri Lanka who do not miss a single Full Moon
day and dutifully take those precepts. But their minds are filled with ignorance and some of
them mostly get together and gossip all day.
§ While taking those precepts and mindfully disciplining oneself and meditating for a whole day
is an excellent way to practice, just nominally taking precepts is not going to do anything to
cleanse one’s mind.
§ Then there is the perception that taking even a glass of wine (or some mild alcoholic beverage)
is highly immoral. While it is best to avoid taking any kind of alcohol, drinking a glass of wine
or beer is not a “akusala kamma“. Of course if one gets addicted or intoxicated, then one could
be led to do akusala kamma. Actually, when one gains wisdom via learning Dhamma, the
tendency to crave for alcohol or anything else gradually diminishes.
§ Rituals are prevalent in most Buddhist countries. People may do all sorts of immoral deeds
(gossiping, slandering, using harsh words, fishing, hunting, are a few examples) during the day
and at the end of the day, they light a lamp for the Buddha, say a few verses (“gatha“), and
believe that is all they need to do.
§ All these come under one of the three sanyojana, “silabbata paramasa” (diṭṭhi that says
following rituals or set guidelines can lead to Nibbāna), is removed at the Sotāpanna stage.
§ But it must be emphasized that most of such procedures CAN BE very effective in calming the
mind and building saddhā (both of which then help cultivate wisdom by being able to
comprehend Dhamma), if done properly while making an effort to cleanse one’s mind; see,
“Buddhist Chanting – Introduction“.
9. We can also see that vicikicchā (tendency to do inappropriate/immoral/dangerous deeds) also
arises because one is not aware of how kamma/kamma vipāka operate and has not comprehended
anicca, dukkha, anatta.
§ It is easy for outside influences to change the mind of someone with strong vicikicchā to do bad
things. Since children in general are unaware of what is right and what is wrong, it is easy to
manipulate their minds. This is why making sure children grow up in environments that are
conducive to moral behavior is very important.
§ Even adults, who are not aware of the consequences of immoral behavior have high levels of
vicikicchā. They tend to only look at the immediate gratifications of an act rather than to have a
long-term perspective.
§ Learning Dhamma is the only guaranteed way to remove vicikicchā.
10. Some people tend to think that it is better not to even contemplate on bad consequences of bad
actions, or to learn WHY bad actions are bound to lead to bad outcomes. The thinking is “as long as I
don’t think about such depressing things, I will feel fine”.
§ Just like not knowing that a certain action is unlawful is not a valid argument in a court of law,
ignorance of the Nature’s laws is not a valid excuse. Sometimes one can get away when a law is
broken by telling more lies and changing the decision of a jury. But in the Nature’s court, it is
one’s mind that makes the decisions and one cannot fool one’s own mind.
§ This is why diṭṭhis can be broken only by cleansing one’s mind. One cleanses one’s mind by
first learning about kamma and kamma vipāka first and THEN reading about anicca, dukkha,
anatta, and THEN comprehending the true meanings of those words, i.e., by comprehending
the true nature of this world; see, “Buddha Dhamma – In a Chart” and “How to Cultivate the
Anicca Saññā“.
§ One’s own mind needs to realize futility of doing immoral deeds, not just because they are
bound to bring thousand-fold bad outcomes, but also because there is “no point”, “no real
benefit” of doing bad things to fulfil one’s sense desires or to “own valuable things”; such sense
pleasures or valuable things do not last in the long term. But the consequences can linger on for
long times.
11. As I pointed out in “Why do People Enjoy Immoral Deeds? – Diṭṭhi is Key“, we all have diṭṭhis
that have been cultivated in us by the environment that we grew up in, whether it is cultural, social, or
religious. And Buddhists are no exception. We all need to critically evaluate such diṭṭhis and sort out
which ones are bad for oneself. Buddha has clearly stated which diṭṭhis are bad: “Three Kinds of
Diṭṭhi, Eightfold Paths, and Samādhi“.
November 27,2015; Revised December 17, 2017; May 17, 2019; August 21, 2019
Introduction
1. Suddhaṭṭhaka is not even mentioned in even many Theravāda Texts. I have deliberated for some
time whether this post is premature. This post requires an understanding of basic concepts that I have
discussed so far (as of November 2015).
§ Please don’t read it, unless you have thought about the basic concepts of “san,” gati (or gathi),
āsava, paticca samuppāda, etc. It may not make much sense, and thus it could discourage
people from proceeding any further thinking, “this stuff does not make sense.”
§ On the other hand, for those who have some understanding of those concepts, this could help
gain more insight.
§ As I publish more posts on this issue, the picture will become increasingly apparent. Please be
patient. The value of the Buddha Dhamma will also become apparent, and that is the best way
to cultivate saddhā (faith based on understanding).
§ This topic discussed in detail in the “Nāma & Rūpa to Nāmarūpa” subsection of the “Living
Dhamma” section.
2. Anything has to be either sankhata or asankhata.
§ A saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) has a beginning, transforms in unpredictable ways during
existence (viparinama), and eventually ceases to exist; see, for example, “Root Cause of Anicca
– Five Stages of a Saṅkhata” and “Does any Object (Rupa) Last only 17 Thought Moments?“.
§ An asaṅkhata (asankata in Sinhala) has no beginning, does not change during existence, and
has no endpoint. An asaṅkhata (asankata in Sinhala) lasts forever. Nibbāna is the only
asaṅkhata (asankata in Sinhala) dhamma, and it does not belong to “this world of 31 realms”.
§ There is nothing in between. Please think carefully about the truth of that.
§ Everything in this world is a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), i.e., has a beginning and an
end. And this has been confirmed by science during the past 100 years or so. Einstein thought
our universe was in a steady-state, and if proven that way, could have contradicted Buddha
Dhamma. But now it has become clear that nothing in this universe will last forever. And
everything is changing, in flux.
§ All the matter in the universe is thought to have created some 14 billion years ago, in a “Big
Bang.” Buddha Dhamma has a different explanation. However, there is no doubt that any
matter has a finite lifetime. Thus Buddha Dhamma is correct in this fundamental aspect.
Origin of Matter – Background
3. If we accept that all matter has been created in some way, what is the origin of matter?
§ Scientists have no clear explanation of this at this point in time (November 2015). They can
calculate the evolution of the universe from a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, but
physics is unable to explain what happened before the Big Bang.
§ And, of course, the “Big Bang Theory” has not yet fully confirmed, even though most scientists
believe it. Still, some scientists do not believe everything “popped up” all of a sudden in a Big
Bang. They think that universes are cyclic, i.e., they transform and evolve; see, for example,
“Endless Universe – Beyond the Big Bang,” by P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok (2007).
4. Buddha Dhamma, of course, says all living beings living at present have existed forever.
§ In other words, “all existing life-streams” have existed forever. In each life, a given “life-
stream” gets a physical body (coarse or subtle depending on the realm of existence), and that
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Abhidhamma 1181
physical body is, of course, a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala). When that physical body dies, the
life-stream takes hold of a new body; see, “What Reincarnates? – Concept of a Life-stream“.
§ What “propagates” from life-to-life (while continually changing), are the āsava, anusaya, and
gathi (mental properties) that make up a dynamic (ever-changing) life-stream.
§ Thus, the universe does not start with a “Big Bang,” as many scientists believe right now.
Remember that only 100 or so years ago, scientists thought the universe was in a steady state.
Scientific theories change to “fit the existing data.” But pure Buddha Dhamma has not changed
at all since Buddha Gotama taught it 2500 years ago; see, “Historical Background.”
5. The Buddha discouraged people from investigating the properties of the universe in detail.
However, he has taught that uncountable “planetary systems” like our Solar system exist in the
universe. That also has been confirmed by science.
§ In any case, whatever the model that science eventually clarifies WILL BE consistent with
Buddha Dhamma. That model will have living beings in existence somewhere in the 31 realms.
This has been discussed in detail in a few suttas, especially the Aggañña sutta. But don’t bother
to look it up on the internet, because all current translations are embarrassingly bad. I have
written an introductory post: “Buddhism and Evolution – Aggañña Sutta (DN 27)“.
§ In that sutta, the Buddha explains how conglomerates of “planetary systems” blow up and are
re-formed in time scales of “mahā kappas.” He has given a simile to get an idea of the length of
a mahā kappa, and it is approximately several billion years; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of
Dhamma.” And this destruction of a “star system” seems to be what scientists have observed as
a supernova. Supernovae are of frequent occurrence; about three of them can be expected to
happen every century in our Milky Way galaxy.
§ We will slowly go through the Aggañña sutta because that needs enough background material. I
expect this topic will take us several years, and many essays, to complete. However, the mind is
the precursor: “Manopubbangamā Dhammā..“.
Origin of Matter – The Mind
6. Yet, now we have enough background material on the website to get an idea about how all the
saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala) in this world originate and die off, AT THE VERY FUNDAMENTAL
LEVEL.
§ Here we will discuss only the origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a
“suddhaṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).
§ This unit of matter is billion times smaller than “an atom” in modern science. One time, not
long ago, science believed that an atom was the smallest unit of matter. But they are composites
of many “elementary particles.” Even many of those “elementary particles” are shown to have
more structure! At present, there is no end in sight how smaller a “basic unit of matter” can get.
Now science is unable to distinguish between “matter” and “energy.”
§ For example, a “Higgs boson” is just a packet of energy.
§ Matter and energy are essentially the same, related by the famous equation, E (energy) = m
(mass) x c2, where c is the speed of light. Thus any small unit of matter is indistinguishable
from a “packet of energy.” For example, the light we see comes in “packets” called photons.
Thus photon is matter in this sense, and therefore everything in this world at the primary level
can have the label “matter” or “energy.”
§ The distinction between “matter” and “energy” is blurred at this fundamental level.
7. A suddhaṭṭhaka is a “packet of energy” and is THE basic unit of matter. It is much smaller than in
energy compared to a light photon that we see. A humongous number of suddhaṭṭhaka would have
the energy of a single light photon.
§ A suddhaṭṭhaka, being a saṅkhata (sankata in Sinhala), is created by the mind. That may be
surprising to many of you, but as we progress, I will provide evidence that it is true. That is
why the Buddha said, “manō pubbangamā dhammā…”, i.e., “everything has mind as the
precursor…”.
§ However, almost all of the matter around us was created by this “mental process” a very long
time ago. That is the story in the Aggañña Sutta. At present also, suddhaṭṭhaka are being
created by us all the time (via javana citta), but in very minute quantities.
§ Anyone with higher abhiññā powers is supposed to be able to create a significant amount of
matter, like a flower or even larger entities. Matter (at the level of suddhaṭṭhaka) is created by
javana citta. And someone with abhiññā powers can maintain a citta vīthi with javana citta
flowing continuously to generate “significant amounts of matter.” I briefly discussed that at the
end of the post, “Citta Vīthi – Processing of Sense Inputs.”
8. But most of the time, what we are doing now is to “remake” different types of saṅkhata (sankata in
Sinhala) using the “raw material” (suddhaṭṭhaka) created billions of years ago. These original
suddhaṭṭhaka have lifetimes of close to 20 antakkappa (or antarākalpa), where 80 such antakkappa
are in a mahā kappa.
§ Thus instead of having a lifetime of 17 thought moments, as some people erroneously believe, a
suddhaṭṭhaka has a very long lifetime. Again, modern physics has confirmed that some of the
elementary particles (e.g., electron) have very long lifetimes. Therefore, this idea of
“everything arising and ceasing rapidly” is a misconception; see, “Does any Object (Rupa) Last
only 17 Thought Moments?“. We will discuss this in more detail in the future.
§ Please don’t hesitate to ask questions at this early stage. There is a lot of information in this
post to digest, and some of them will become clearer as we proceed.
What is Suddhaṭṭhaka?
9. Suddhaṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “attha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter
consisting of eight fundamental entities (usually translated as the “pure octad.”)
§ Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“: patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo. These are indeed the most
fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. It may be hard to
believe for many at this stage, but those arise due to our “gati” (or “gathi“) that I have
discussed in several posts; see, the introductory post: “The Law of Attraction, Habits, Character
(Gati), and Cravings (Asavas)“. By the way, removal of “āsava” and “gathi” lead to Nibbāna:
“The Way to Nibbāna – Removal of Āsavas.” One needs to have an understanding of these
concepts to grasp the material in this post.
§ These satara mahā bhūta are first created by the mind with four basic “gathi” of humans:
“thada gathiya” (in Sinhala) means the “coarseness,” corresponding to patavi; a defiled mind is
“hard” and “coarse” and correspond to “patavi” nature.
§ The word āpo comes from the tendency to “attach or get attracted to worldly things” (“bandena
gathiya” means the “bind together,” which leads to liquidity in science). Tejo comes from
“fiery or energetic” (“théjas gathi” in Sinhala), and vāyo refers to “motion” (“salena gathiya”
in Sinhala). They are all created in javana citta that arise in mind, of course, in minute
quantities that cannot be detected. However, those with abhiññā powers can generate large
amounts of matter like a flower.
10. Those most fundamental four units (satara mahā bhūta) are supposed to be created by the
mind due to avijjā or ignorance . We like to have possession of things made out of these units
because we do not comprehend the “unfruitful nature” of such impermanent things.
§ That is discussed briefly in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Mahāhatthipadopama Sutta (MN 28)“.
An English translation; “WebLink: suttacentral: The Greater Discourse on the Simile of the
Elephant’s Footprint (MN 28)“. Thanks to Dr. Sein Myint for pointing this out.
§ Now, the craving for these material things leads to four more gathi due to taṇhā. Due to
our tendency to think highly (“ varnan karanava”
ä in Sinhala), another of “gati varna” is
created as different manifestations of the satara mahā bhūta. Similarly, three more units called
gandha, rasa, and oja created due to taṇhā. Those correspond to our desire to be in touch with
them, keep them close (rassa), and to re-generate them. It will take too much space to explain
these in detail, but I hope you get the basic idea.
11. Therefore, four basic units of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo arise due to avijjā, and the other four of
varna, gandha, rasa, and oja arise due to taṇhā. The latter four also occur due to patavi, āpo, tejo,
vāyo (actually they are just different modes of vibration of patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo). We will get into
more detail in the future so that even physicists would be able to appreciate the value of
Abhidhamma.
§ These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rūpa.” They always rise
together; all eight are there in any suddhaṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component
can vary, and thus some suddhaṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even
then, all eight are present to some extent. That is equivalent to saying that wherever there is
avijjā, there is taṇhā, and vice versa.
§ This very fundamental level is called the “bhūta” stage. Bhūta is another name for “ghost”
because of their elusive nature. They can never be detected and can only be “seen” by a
Buddha. The Buddha explained this to Mahā Brahma, who thought he knew everything about
the world: “WebLink: suttacentral: Brahmanimantanika Sutta (Majjhima Nikaya 49)“. I will
explain this sutta in detail later.
§ And a suddhaṭṭhaka can never be divided; thus they are called “avinibbhöga rūpa kalapa.”
Critical Role of Gati
12. Thus “gathi” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rūpa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is
the suddhaṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy is converted to matter at the very fundamental
stage. Just keep that in mind as we proceed.
§ When enormous numbers of these suddhaṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of
“mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of brahmas and some gandhabbas are made of mahā bhūta.
This level of “solidification” can be compared (in energy) to electromagnetic radiation at the
long-wavelength range; thus, we cannot “see” those entities with our eyes.
§ Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed,
that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of
devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but brahmas can see them.
§ Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are
called “patavi dhātu”; suddhaṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly patavi. In liquids,
things are bound together and flow together because they mostly have āpo dhātu. Not only fire
but also those objects that have “energetic appearance,” have more tejo. And not only the wind
but also things that are prone to move, have more vāyo.
§ Details of gati at, “Gati, Bhava, and Jāti.”
Other Implications
13. Therefore, we can see that patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo have much deeper meanings than just earth,
water, fire, and wind. Why did the ancient Greeks also use the same terms? That is due to the same
reason that Hinduism also uses terms like karma (which is the Sanskrit word for kamma), Nirvana
(which is the Sanskrit word for Nibbana), anapana, etc.
§ There have been three Buddhas in this mahā kappa (i.e., during the existence of our Solar
system) before the Buddha Gotama; that is how those terms came to usage before Buddha
Gotama. Those concepts by the previous Buddhas were transmitted down through successive
generations, but the true meanings got lost.
§ Human history is much longer than tens of thousands of years, as believed by many today.
Whole continents can submerge, wiping out entire populations; this is not being considered
seriously yet, but there is evidence: see, WebLink: wiki: Submerged continent. Anyway, that is
a topic to be discussed later when more evidence becomes available. It will be proven that one
region that has not changed since the formation of the Earth is Asia encompassing Sri Lanka,
India, and China. Archeologists should focus more in that region rather than in Africa. See,
“Ancient teeth found in China challenge modern human migration theory.”
14. As I mentioned above, there were three Buddhas before Buddha Gotama. That is how some of the
key terms like patavi, āpo, tejo, vāyo and kamma, and Nibbana (nirvana) have been in use even
before the Buddha Gotama. They had been transmitted down through generations, but of course, their
true meanings had been lost.
§ Losing the true meanings in the Tipitaka happened at least a few times, even during this
Buddha sāsana, within the past 2500 years. The best example is the misinterpretation of san,
sansara, anicca, and anatta during just the past hundreds of years; see, “What is “San”?
Meaning of Sansara (or Samsara)” and “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations.”
§ But the Buddha Gotama has said that his Buddha sāsana will last for 5000 years. We are
only halfway through. That is why it is making a comeback now. And this time it will have
staying power due to the presence of the internet. That is one reason why we should all be
forever grateful to modern science, much more than for all other technological wonders it
has brought about.
1. This is an advanced topic (yet, hopefully made easy even for those who are not into Abhidhamma).
Please don’t hesitate to comment if something is not clear. A simpler version is at: “What are rūpa? –
Dhamma are rūpa too!“.
§ In contrast to touching, smelling, and tasting, we do not directly “touch” the external world
(matter) with our eyes, ears or the mind.
§ While we experience the “outside world” as it is (or objectively) with our five physical senses,
what we interact with our minds are our own “perceptions, feelings, plans, and hopes” for that
external world.
§ We will get into more details on those two aspects in the future, but in this post we will look
at what “dhamma” are in relation to the mind. That will help us address those other two issues
in the future.
§ It is to be noted that dhammā are rūpa below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage; dhamma
as in Buddha Dhamma or Abhidhamma refer to Buddha’s teachings.
§ As I mentioned in the “Abhidhamma – Introduction“, I very much want to make Abhidhamma
easy to grasp for anyone. I also want to highlight the fact the Buddha Dhamma is well ahead of
science (quantum mechanics) in understanding even our material world; science has not even
begun to explore the mind.
2. Existence in this world of 31 realms is maintained via our attachments to “things” in this world.
These “things” are rūpa.
§ When our minds contact these external rūpa, we generate very brief sense enjoyments called
assāda; see, “Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana“. Since we perceive these sense contacts to be long-
lasting and enjoyable (and ignore the sufferings that we go through to acquire them), we
willingly desire such sense pleasures.
§ However, any rūpa that arises is subjected to unexpected change (viparinama) and
eventual decay and destruction, which is the basis of anicca nature.
3. Another factor that we have not discussed much in detail is that rūpa have different levels of
texture or solidity.
§ The rūpa that we experience in the human realms (and those realms below us) are the densest
form called dhatu. The deva realms above us have finer dhatu that we cannot see. In the rūpa
lokas, rupi brahmas have even finer rūpa called mahā bhūta. And in the arūpa loka, there are
just traces of bhūta (just the hadaya vatthu) made of the smallest unit of matter called
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], and of course much finer gati (or gathi).
§ You may want to review the concepts discussed in the following posts: “What Are Rūpa?
(Relation to Nibbāna)“, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“.
4. It is conventional knowledge is that we experience the external world with our five physical
senses: We see with our eyes, hear with the ears, smell with the nose, taste with the tongue, and
touch things with our physical bodies.
§ Is that all one experiences? Imagine being in a dark chamber totally isolated from the rest of the
world. A good example is the punishment by the military called solitary confinement especially
in the old days: one is kept in a totally isolated dark cell for many hours at a time.
§ Does such a person experience the outside world? Of course. He/she can think about all sorts of
things: recall past events, think about the future, recall any place that he has been to, etc.
§ In fact, we do this any given day, not only by recalling past experiences, but also by imagining
desired future events.
5. Sense contacts other than the five physical senses are due to the sixth sense: the mind. One is
totally unaware of the external world only when one is totally unconscious.
§ So, what are the rūpa that we experience with our minds? These are dhamma! As stated in the
phrase, “manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“, contacts of dhamma with the
mana indriya leads to mano viññāṇa.
6. The arising of viññāṇa due to different types of sense inputs is described in abhidhamma (and also
in “WebLink: suttacentral: Cha Chakka Sutta (MN 148)“) as:
“cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṃ”,
“sotañca paṭicca sadde ca uppajjati sotaviññāṇaṃ”,
“ghānañca paṭicca gandhe ca uppajjati ghānaviññāṇaṃ“,
“jivhañca paṭicca rase ca uppajjati jivhāviññāṇaṃ“,
“kāyañca paṭicca phoṭṭhabbe ca uppajjati kāyaviññāṇaṃ“, and
“manañca paṭicca dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“
§ Thus it is clear that mano viññāṇa arise when dhamma make contact with the mana indriya,
just like cakkhu viññāṇa arise when (vanna) rūpa or light make contact with the cakkhu
indriya (eyes) or sota viññāṇa arise when sadda rūpa (sound waves) make contact with the sota
indriya (ears).
§ Kaya viññāṇa result from contacts which are the most coarse (pottabba or touch due to dhatu),
and mano viññāṇa result from the contacts that are extremely fine, dhamma.
7. Thus, we can categorize our six types of contacts with the external world according to the
“coarseness” of the contacts.
§ The body contacts (touch), taste, and smell are the coarse contacts; they involve direct touching
(pottabba), and those involve solid particulates (taste and smell).
§ Vision involves light particles (photons) interacting with the physical eye. Light was not even
considered a particle until Einstein, Compton and others proved that in the early 1920’s.
§ In the language of physics, sound involves phonons which have even less energy than light
photons, i.e., they are “even softer”.
8. We can also see that the sense elements in the body also get less and less coarse in that order. It
must be noted that the sensing elements in the ear are not the ear that we see, but very sensitive area
deep inside the ear.
§ According to Buddha Dhamma (and confirmed by science), two things respond to each other
and last longer when in heavy usage, if they have similar densities. For example, if a steel rod
rubs against a wooden rod, the wooden rod will soon wear out. But two steel rods (or two
wooden rods) can be rubbing against each for long times.
§ Thus going from touch, smell, taste, sight, and hearing, both the external influences — touch,
tasty things, smells, light (photons), sound (phonons) — and the sense elements (body, tongue,
nose, eyes, ears) become finer in that order.
9. The finest sensing element is the “mana indriya” which is inside the brain. It is likely to be one of
the following: thalamus, amygdala, or hippocampus. I have not had enough time to investigate the
functions of these sensitive elements of the brain, but according to Buddha Dhamma, the “mana
indriya” is inside the brain and is analogous to the eyes or the ears; more details will become clear as
we discuss below.
§ What come down in the legend as the “third eye” is this “mana indriya“. It is supposed to be
located behind the forehead.
§ The rūpa that come into contact with the mana indriya are finer than a suddhāshtaka
[suddhaṭṭhaka], and are still in the “gati” stage, but they are on the way to become
suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. They are not coarse enough to be “seeing” even with abhiññā
powers, and do not make contact with other five coarse senses. Thus they are called,
“anidassan appatighan dhammayatana pariyapanna rupan“.
§ Here, “anidassana” means “cannot be seen” and “appatigha” means “cannot be touched or
sensed with even the finest instrument”. And, “dhammayatana pariyapanna rupan” means “can
make contact only with the dhammayatana or mana indriya”.
10. In the post, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“, we discussed how the
smallest material element, a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka], is created by the mind with origins
in four basic “gati” of humans that arise due to avijjā: “thada gathiya” (in Sinhala) means the
“coarseness”, corresponding to patavi; “bandena gathiya” means the “bind together” which leads to
liquidity corresponding to āpo; “thejas gathiya” means the “fiery or energetic”, corresponding to tejo;
and, “salena gathiya” means the “motion”, corresponding to vāyo.
§ craving for these material things lead to four more gati due to taṇhā: Due to our tendency
to think highly (“varnanā karanava” in Sinhala), another gati of “varna” is created as different
manifestations of the satara mahā bhūta. Similarly, three more units called gandha, rasa, and
oja are created due to taṇhā corresponding to our desire to be in touch with them, keep them
close (rassa), and to re-generate them. [rassa:[adj.] short; dwarfish; stunted]
11. Before these eight inseparable units solidify into what we call matter, there is the precursor stage
of gati: cultivation of gati leads to bhūta, which are in the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]
stage. Further solidification of bhūta leads to mahā bhūta. The fine rūpa of brahmas are composed of
mahā bhūta.
§ The gati stage of rūpa — the origins of rūpa — are also called “mano rūpa“: these are really
what we visualize in our minds. We can visualize scenes from the past, and those are mano
rūpa. In the process of making gati, we constantly think about associated material things; those
are mano rūpa.
12. Mahā bhūta, upon further condensation, become dhatu. The bodies of devas are made of finer
dhatu, and our bodies — as well as all material things we see — are composed of denser dhatu.
§ Therefore, the origins of all matter is gati! But our gati (of normal humans) actually do not lead
to the formation of significant amounts of even suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. So, we still have
a long way to go before we can explain how these solid objects in our world were formed
as described in the Agganna Sutta.
13. Just like the eye is receiving visual information or the ear the sounds, the “mana indriya” is
receiving “dhamma“. And dhamma are much finer than light or sound rūpa. In fact, all five physical
senses deal with signals transmitted via solidified particles made out of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka],
but dhamma are just energy, below what we call “matter”. Actually, even most physicists do not
consider light as matter or “particles”; I will write a post on why light photons are indeed particles
according to quantum mechanics.
§ As we discussed in the post, “The Origin of Matter – Suddhāshtaka [Suddhaṭṭhaka]“, even a
single light particle (photon) is made of a very large number of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka].
§ As we discussed there, a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] is made by the mind. Dhamma can be
considered the early stages of a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]; they are in fact kammic energy
packets made by the mind in javana citta,and arise due to our gati. This is really the link
between mind and matter!
14. Therefore, all six senses allow our minds to interact with the material world. We actually interact
with two worlds: the material world and the mind world or the mano thalaya.
§ Different types of rūpa (varna, gandha, rasa, oja, pottabba) in our physical world (rūpa loka)
are built with suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka]. Dhammā or kamma beeja (in the mano loka) are
basically “energy packets” not yet solidified to the state of a suddhāshtaka.
§ The pañcakkhandha of a living being has “components” from both worlds. The rūpakkhandha
represents interactions with the material world (as mental records); see, “Panñakkhandha or
Five Aggregates – A Misinterpreted Concept“. The other four khandha (vedanā, saññā,
saṅkhāra, viññāṇa) represent the mind world.
§ Each and every living being is associated with a pañcakkhandha. The Buddha said that one
cannot define a living being with less that five khandhas.
§ To repeat: One’s pancakkhadha is not one’s body as is commonly described. It is not even
physical. It is all mental: “Pancupādānakkhandha – It is All Mental“.
15. The creation of suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] by the mind in javana citta, starts first by enhancing
one’s gati. As we will discuss in a future post on the “Asevana Paccaya“, the more one does activities
related to a given gati, that gati grows. [Āsevana-paccayā: repetition, is one of the 24 conditional
relations paccayā.]
§ The growing of a gati is really the accumulation of a kamma beeja (seed), and that is deposited
in the kamma bhava in the mind plane. These are really dhamma that is in “manañca paṭicca
dhamme ca uppajjati manoviññāṇaṃ“.
§ And they (dhamma or kamma beeja) can come back to one’s mind when the mind is in a
receptive state for such a gati. Thus it is a self-feeding feedback loop.
§ This is an important point to contemplate on. This is why a drunkard gets the urge to drink, or a
gambler gets the urge to visit a casino. People who don’t have such gati, do not get such urges
because they do not have corresponding dhamma repeatedly coming back to impinge on
the mana indriya.
§ By the way, as discussed in the “Living Dhamma” section, any such “bad gati” can be reduced
and eventually eliminated by a two-step method: (i) forcefully stop activities — and conscious
thoughts about them — that contribute that gati when one becomes aware DURING such an act
OR a conscious thought, (ii) keep learning Buddha Dhamma to comprehend how that process
can actually work (as discussed starting with basic fundamentals of Buddha Dhamma in the
“Living Dhamma” section); one key aspect here to contemplate on the bad consequences of
such actions/thoughts.
16. To emphasize, dhamma arise due to kamma that we commit. The more kamma we do, the
corresponding dhamma will grow, and become gati.
§ Dhamma means “to bear”; one bears what one likes and what one engages in.
§ When one cultivates “dog gati” that is what one bears. And that is what comes back to one’s
mind at the cuti-paṭisandhi moment and can lead to the next bhava, and thus birth (jāti) as a
dog.
17. However, creation of a suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] requires trillions of citta vīthi running
consecutively. Thus it does not happen significantly by a normal human being. It requires not only
jhānas, but being able to get into samapatthi. Those with abhiññā powers have the ability to get into
samapatti very quickly.
§ When in jhānas, cittas can still switch back to five physical senses in between. When one is in a
jhāna, one can hear external sounds, for example.
§ However, when one is in a samapatti, the jhānic cittas can flow unceasingly for long times.
Thus, pancadvara citta vīthi cannot run in between, and thus one is totally unaware of the
external environment when in samapatti.
18. Furthermore, when in samapatti, jhānic citta flow unceasingly and make each new javana citta
stronger than the predecessor with the “Asevana Paccaya“. We will discuss this in detail in the
future.
§ This is how those with abhiññā powers (i.e., who can easily get into samapatti and have
practiced it well) can even make physical objects: One can start off with a picture of a flower in
one’s mind and then by creating more and more suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] with each
new javana citta, create an actual flower in a very short time!
19. Finally, dhamma in the nāma loka are the same as those viññāṇa established in the kamma
bhava. This is a subtle point; see, “Viññāṇa Aggregate“.
§ Dhamma or viññāṇa are called anidassana, appatigha rūpa (rūpa that cannot be seen or made
contact with) and they are just energies lying below the suddhāshtaka [suddhaṭṭhaka] stage;
see, “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
§ Kamma bhava is the same as the nāma loka; Dhamma in the nāma loka are the same as viññāṇa
that are established in the kamma bhava.; see, “Our Two Worlds: Material and Immaterial“.
12.9.1 24 conditional relations Paccaya
17.Jhāna: jhānas
18.path: magga
19.Associaton: sampayutta
20.Dissociation: vippayutta
21.Presence: atthi
22.Absence: natthi
23.Disappearance: vigata
24.Non-disappearance: avigata
1: Root-condition hetu-paccayā is that condition that resembles the root of a tree. Just as a tree rests
on its root, and remains alive only as long as its root is not destroyed, similarly all kammically
advantageous and disadvantageous mental states are entirely dependent on the simultaneity and
presence of their respective roots, i.e, of greed lobha, hate dosa confusion moha or greedlessness
alobha hatelessness adosa unconfusedness amoha For the definition of these 6 roots, see: mūla
The roots are a condition by way of root for the mental phenomena associated with a root, and for the
material phenomena produced thereby e.g. for bodily expression; Patth.
2: Object-condition ārammana-paccayā is called something which, as object, forms the condition for
consciousness and mental phenomena. Thus, the physical object of sight consisting in colour and
light 'light-wave', is the necessary condition and the sine qua non for the arising of visual-
consciousness cakkhu-viññāṇa etc.; sound 'sound wave' for ear-consciousness sotā-viññāṇa etc.;
further, any object arising in the mind is the condition for mind-consciousness mano-viññāṇa The
mental-object may be anything whatever, material or mental, past, present or future, real or
imaginary.
3: Predominance-condition adhipati-paccayā is the term for 4 things, on the preponderance and
predominance of which are dependent the mental phenomena associated with them, namely:
concentrated intention chanda, energy viriya, consciousness citta and investigation vīmamsā In one
and the same state of consciousness, however, only one of these 4 phenomena can be predominant at
a time.;Whenever such phenomena as consciousness and mental properties are arising by giving
preponderance to one of these 4 things, then this phenomenon is for the other phenomena a condition
by way of predominance; Patth.. Cf. iddhi-pāda
4-5: Proximity and contiguity or immediacy-condition anantara and samanantara-paccayā - both
being identical - refer to any state of consciousness and mental phenomena associated with them,
which are the conditions for the immediately following stage in the process of consciousness. For
example, in the visual process, visual-consciousness is for the immediately following mindelement -
performing the function of receiving the visible object - a condition by way of contiguity; and so is
this mind-element for the next following mind-consciousness element, performing the function of
investigating the object, etc. Cf. viññāṇa-kicca.
6: Co-nascence condjtion sahajāta-paccayā i.e. condition by way of simultaneous arising, is a
phenomenon that for another one forms, a condition in such a way that, simultaneously with its
arising, also the other thing must arise. Thus, for instance, in one and the same moment each of the 4
mental groups feeling, perception, mental constructions and consciousness is for the 3 other groups a
condition by way of co-nascence or co-arising; or again each of the 4 physical elements solid, liquid,
heat, motion is such a condition for the other 3 elements. Only at the moment of conception in the
mother's womb does materiality physical base of mind serve for the 4 mental groups as a condition by
way of conascence.
7: Condition by way of mutuality aññāmañña-paccayā All the just mentioned associated and co-
nascent mental phenomena, as well as the 4 physical elements, are, of course, at the same time also
conditioned by way of mutuality,;just like three sticks propped up one by another.; The 4 mental
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Abhidhamma 1191
groups are one for another a condition by way of mutuality. So also are the 4 elements, and also
mentality and materiality at the moment of conception.
8: Support-condition nissaya-paccayā This condition refers either to a pre-nascent see: 10 or co-
nascent see: 6 phenomenon which is aiding other phenomena in the manner of a foundation or base,
just as the trees have the earth as their foundation, or as the oil-painting rests on the canvas. In this
way, the 5 sense-organs and the physical base of the mind are for the corresponding 6 kinds of
consciousness a prenascent, i.e. previously arisen, condition by way of support. Further all co-nascent
see: 6 phenomena are mutually see: 7 conditioned by each other by way of support.
9: Decisive-support or inducement condition upanissaya-paccayā is threefold, namely a by way of
object ārammanūpanissaya-paccayā b by way of proximity anantarūpanissaya c natural decisive
support pakatupanissaya These conditions act as strong inducement or cogent reason.
a. Anything past, present or future, material or mental, real or imaginary, may, as object of our
thinking, become a decisive support, or strong inducement, to moral, immoral or kammically neutral
states of mind. Evil things, by wrong thinking about them, become an inducement to immoral life; by
right thinking, an inducement to moral life. But good things may be an inducement not only to
similarly good things, but also to bad things, such as self-conceit, vanity, envy, etc.
b. is identical with proximity condition No. 4.
c. Faith, virtue, etc., produced in one's own mind, or the influence of climate, food, etc., on one's body
and mind, may act as natural and decisive support-conditions. Faith may be a direct and natural
inducement to charity, virtue to mental training, etc.; greed to theft, hate to murder; unsuitable food
and climate to ill-health; friends to spiritual progress or deterioration.
10: Pre-nascence-condition purejāta-paccayā refers to something previously arisen, which forms a
base for something arising later on. For example, the 5 physical sense-organs and the physical base of
mind, having already arisen at the time of birth, form the condition for the consciousness arising later,
and for the mental phenomena associated therewith.
11: Post-nascence-condition pacchā-jāta-paccayā refers to consciousness and the phenomena
therewith associated, because they are - just as is the feeling of hunger- a necessary condition for the
preservation of this already arisen body.
12: Repetition-condition āsevana-paccayā refers to the kammical consciousness, in which each time
the preceding impulse moments javana-citta are for all the succeeding ones a condition by way of
repetition and frequency, just as in learning by heart, through constant repetition, the later recitation
becomes gradually easier and easier.
13: Kamma-condition kamma-paccayā The pre-natal kamma i.e kamma-intentions, kamma-cetanā in
a previous birth is the generating condition cause of the 5 sense-organs, the fivefold sense-
consciousness, and the other kamma-produced mental and material phenomena in a later birth. -
Kammical intention is also a condition by way of kamma for the co-nascent mental phenomena
associated therewith, but these phenomena are in no way kamma-results.
14: Kamma-result-condition vipāka-paccayā The kamma-resultant 5 kinds of sense-consciousness are
a condition by way of kamma-result for the co-nascent mental and material phenomena.
15: Nutriment-condition āhāra-paccayā For the 4 nutriments, see: āhāra
16: Ability-condition indriya-paccayā This condition applies to 20 abilities indriya, leaving out No. 7
and 8 from the 22 abilities. Of these 20 abilities, the 5 physical sense-organs 1 - 5, in their capacity as
abilities, form a condition only for unmaterial phenomena visual-consciousness etc.; physical vitality
6 and all the remaining abilities, for the co-nascent mental and material phenomena.
17: Jhāna-condition jhāna-paccayā is a name for the 7 so-called jhāna-factors, as these form a
condition to the co-nascent mental and material phenomena, to wit: 1 thought-conception vitakka 2
discursive thinking vicāra 3 interest pīti 4 joy sukha 5 sadness domanassa 6 indifference upekkhā 7
concentration samādhi For definition s. Pāli terms.
1, 2, 3, 4, 7 are found in 4 classes of greedy consciousness see: Tab. I. 22-25; 1, 2, 5, 7 in hateful
consciousness ib. 30, 31; 1, 2, 6, 7 in the classes of confused consciousness ib. 32, 33.
This condition does not only apply to jhāna alone, but also to the general intensifying 'absorbing'
impact of these 7 factors.
18 path-condition magga-paccayā refers to the 12 path-factors, as these are for the kammically
advantageous and disadvantageous mental phenomena associated with them, a way of escape from
this or that mental constitution, namely: 1 knowledge paññā = sammādiṭṭhi right understanding, 2
right or wrong thought-conception vitakka 3 right speech sammā-vācā 4 right bodily action sammā-
kammanta, 5 right livelihood sammā-ājīva 6 right or wrong energy viriya 7 right or wrong awareness
or mindfulness sati 8 right or wrong concentration samādhi 9 wrong views micchādiṭṭhi 10 wrong
speech micchā-vācā 11 wrong bodily action micchā-kammanta 12 wrong livelihood micchā-ājīva Cf.
magga
19: Association-condition sampayutta-paccayā refers to the co-nascent see: 6 and mutually see: 7
conditioned 4 mental groups khandha as they aid each other by their being associated, by having a
common physical base, a common object, and by their arising and disappearing simultaneously;
Patth. Com..
20: Dissociation-condition vippayutta-paccayā refers to such phenomena as aid other phenomena by
not baving the same physical base eye, etc. and objects. Thus material phenomena are for mental
phenomena, and conversely, a condition by way of dissociation, whether co-nascent or not.
21: Presence-condition atthi-paccayā refers to a phenomenon - being pre-nascent or co-nascent -
which through its presence is a condition for other phenomena. This condition applies to the
conditions Nos. 6, 7, 8, 10, 11.
22: Absence-condition natthi-paccayā refers to consciousness, etc., which has just passed, and which
thus forms the necessary condition for the immediately following stage of consciousness by giving it
an opportunity to arise. Cf. No. 4.
23: Disappearance-condition vigata-paccayā is identical with No. 22.
24: Non-disappearance-condition avigata-paccayā is identical with No. 21.
These 24 conditions should be known thoroughly for a detailed understanding of that famous formula
of the dependent origination paticcasamuppāda.
Mahā Thera Nyanatiloka. Manual of Buddhist Terms and Doctrines, Buddhist Publication Society,
first edition 1952.
April 13, 2017; revised January 19, 2018; August 20, 2018; January 7, 2019
It is a good idea to read the posts, “Amazingly Fast Time Evolution of a Thought (Citta)” and
“Viññāṇa – What It Really Means” first.
1. Billions of citta flow in a second, and what we experience is the cumulative effect of billions of
citta, which we call a “thought”. Let us start at the base state of a citta (loosely translated as a
thought, but it is really not). Each and every citta has 7 universal cetasika (mental factors); those
universal cetasika are discussed in, “What is in a Thought? Why Gathi are so Important?“.
§ Those 7 unversal cetasika are: Phassa (contact), saññā (perception), vedanā (feeling), cetanā
(intention), ekaggata (one-pointedness), jivitindriya (life faculty), and manasikāra (memory).
This is the “baseline” state of a citta, which lasts only a billionth of a second.
§ And during that brief time, many other cetasika (good or bad) can be incorporated into a citta.
But let us consider the simpler case where no other cetasika are incorporated.
§ Even such a simple citta is still contaminated or defiled at the end of that brief time. This
contamination is manifested in vedanā and saññā cetasika.
2. Each INDIVIDUAL citta — during its existence for a billionth of a second — undergoes
change in 9 stages! Such a fast process cannot be seen by any human other than a Buddha; see,
“Citta, Mano, Viññāṇa – Stages of a Thought“.
§ At the end of the 9 stages it has evolved and has become affected by the whole of the
viññāṇakkhandha (including past viññāṇa).
§ The contamination of a citta is manifested in saññā and vedanā; a contaminated citta is called
viññāṇa.
§ Vedanā at the base level is “discerning that an event took place” (“veema” + “danaveema” or
“වීම දැනවීම” in Sinhala). Actual “feelings” about the event will be incorporated as the citta
evolves in 9 stages, as we will discuss below.
3. The other critical universal cetasika that evolves in 9 stages is saññā. Even though it has become
standard to write is as “saññā”, that is not how it is pronounced “sangngā”:
WebLink: Play the word “saññā”
§ Some do indicate the correct pronunciation by writing as saññā. Even though it does not really
matter how one writes it (“sanna” or saññā or “sangnga”), it is critically important to
understand what is meant by it; see, “What is Saññā (Perception)?“.
§ Saññā provides one’s perception about a given event that led to the arising of the citta. For
example, if we see an object, the identification of that object proceeds via those 9 stages (and
vedanā evolves accordingly).
§ So, let us briefly go through the 9 stages of the evolution of a citta using saññā as the basis.
4. Each citta gets contaminated in those 9 stages due to anusaya that comes to the surface as āsava
(or asaya), which are also related to one’s gathi. There are many posts at the site with details on those
entities.
§ Those nine stages of contamination during the lifetime of the citta itself (in a billionth of a
second) are: citta, mano, mānasan, hadayan, pandaran, mano manāyatanam, mana indriyam
(or manindriyam), viññāṇa, viññāṇakkhandha. [Yaṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ
paṇḍaraṃ mano manāyatanaṃ manindriyaṃ viññāṇaṃ viññāṇakkhandho...]
§ This rapid contamination of a citta is explained in the “WebLink: suttacentral:
Paṭiccasamuppāda Vibhaṅga“, in Section 2.5.1. Akusalacitta : “Tattha katamaṃ saṅkhāra
paccayā viññāṇaṃ? Yaṃ cittaṃ mano mānasaṃ hadayaṃ paṇḍaraṃ mano manāyatanaṃ
§ The opposite of “pabha sara” is “pabha assara“, where “assara” means “not take part in”. It
rhymes as “pabhassara“.
§ This is why I say that Pāli is phonetic language. Meanings come based on sounds. I have given
many examples throughout the website.
9. Therefore, a “pabhassara citta” is that base state, or the pure state of a citta, BEFORE it goes
through the 9 stages of contamination. It has only the 7 universal cetasika.
§ Each and every citta of a given person starts off as a pabhassara citta, but gets contaminated to
varying degrees depending one’s personality or one’s advancement along the Path.
§ Even an Arahant‘s citta is not a pabhassara citta; it will contaminate to the level of
“mānasaṃ“, as we discussed above. However, Arahant phala citta, which lasts for only one
citta, is a pabhassara citta.
§ When an Arahant is in Arahant phala samapatti, he/she knows that one is alive, but has no
awareness of outside events. This is called animitta, appanihita, suññata samādhi. That is
different from the nirodha samāpatti, where the flow of citta stops.
§ In Buddha Dhamma, defilements are associated with “dark”, and pure states are associated with
“bright” or “radiant”. So, we could call a pabhassara citta a “radiant citta“, and a mind that
generates AND maintains citta at that state a “radiant mind”.
§ The only time such radiant or pure citta flow occur, is when an Arahant is in Arahant phala
samapatti, with the Arahant phala citta flowing continuously.
10. This process of contamination of a citta is what stated in the “WebLink: suttacentral: Pabhassara
Sutta (AN 1.51)“: “Pabhassaramidaṃ, bhikkhave, cittaṃ. Tañca kho āgantukehi upakkilesehi
upakkiliṭṭhaṃ. Taṃ assutavā puthujjano yathābhūtaṃ nappajānāti. Tasmā ‘assutavato puthujjanassa
cittabhāvanā natthī’ti vadāmī ti“.
§ First, “Pabhassaramidaṃ” is “Pabhassara idaṃ”. As I keep saying, words are sometimes
combined or even a bit changed to rhyme in suttas. So, the first sentence says, “Bhikkus, citta
(the first stage) is pabhassara or does not contribute to rebirth process”.
§ The next sentence says how it is defiled: “āgantuka” (which is also a Sinhala word
“ආගන්තුක”) means “introduced”. What is introduced is “upakilesa” or defilements (that are in
one’s gathi, anusaya, āsava). That leads to “upakilitta” or contamination. Again. “kiliti” in Pāli
and Sinhala means “dirty”.
§ The next sentence says, “those puthujjano who do not understand this, cannot comprehend the
reality (yathābhūta)”. Here puthujjana means a normal human who has not been exposed to
Buddha Dhamma; specifically, one who does not comprehend Tilakkhaṇa. Thus the last
sentence says, “therefore, I do not recommend citta bhāvanā to those who do not comprehend
Tilakkhaṇa“.
11. Another famous quote from the WebLink: suttacentral: Kevaṭṭa Sutta in the Digha Nikāya (DN
11), says, “Viññāṇaṃ anidassanaṃ anantaṃ sabbato pabhaṃ..”. This could be written as “Viññāṇaṃ
anidassanaṃ, anantaṃ, sabbato pabhaṃ..” in order to break into three components.
§ Here, “anidassana” means “cannot be seen”. Viññāṇa is more than a nāma dhammā and has
“kammic energy”. But it is below the “visible rūpa“; see, “Kamma Viññāṇa – Link Between
Mind and Matter“.
§ And, “ananta” is infinite; viññāṇa dhatu is infinite.
· “sabbato” means “in every way/for all”.
§ As we discussed above in #8, “pabbha” means “repeated bhava“ (pabhaṃ comes for that).
§ Therefore, the above verse means, “viññāṇa is unseen, infinite and leads to the rebirth process
for all”.
§ To emphasize: viññāṇa is a defiled citta. We all experience viññāṇa, not pure citta. Even
more accurately, we experience viññāṇakkhandha (viññāṇa aggregate). However, we
loosely call “a thought” a citta.
§ One stops the rebirth process by removing one’s bad gathi, āsava, and anusaya and not letting
citta contaminate beyond the “mānasaṃ” stage.
More details at this post: “Anidassana Viññāṇa – What It Really Means“.
12. Some commentaries say that bhavaṅga citta are pabhassara citta. That is absolutely incorrect.
All living beings have bhavaṅga citta that depend on one’s bhava; see “Bhava and Bhavaṅga –
Simply Explained! “.
§ Bhavaṅga comes from “bhava” + “anga“, where “anga” is “a part”. So, bhavaṅga means
“associated with a given bhava“. Bhavaṅga is obviously different for different bhava.
§ An animal also get into the bhavaṅga state. Does that mean an animal has a “radiant mind”
when it is in the bhavaṅga state?
§ Furthermore, sometimes “anidassana viññāṇa” is also incorrectly explained as the base level of
viññāṇa. Per #11 above, it is clear that anidassana viññāṇa just explains that viññāṇa cannot be
“seen”.
13. In fact, it is not correct to say bhavaṅga citta. Bhavaṅga is a “state of mind”, no citta vīthi run
during bhavaṅga.
§ For example, a living being in the asañña realm does not experience any thoughts. There are
absolutely no citta vīthi running during the whole time there. However, the body is maintained
by bhavaṅga that corresponds to that bhava.
14. So, the point here is that as long as one has bad gathi (or anusaya, āsava, etc., which are all inter-
related and can be just called avijjā), one’s thoughts will be contaminated as they arise.
§ Therefore, we cannot control our thoughts as they arise: a citta is contaminated to the viññāṇa
stage in a billionth of a second, which is unimaginably fast. This is why the Buddha said a
citta is the fastest entity in the world (we loosely call “a thought” a citta, even though it is
really viññāṇakkhandha that we experience).
§ All we can do is to REDUCE avijjā (and thus all those related entities of gathi, āsava, anusaya)
by learning Dhamma and then practicing Ānāpāna (not breath meditation) and Satipaṭṭhāna
meditation.
§ As one proceeds in the Path, one’s had gathi (and āsava and anusaya) will start decreasing,
one’s citta will tend to be more “cleaner and brighter”.
§ Once one gets to a certain level, one can start contemplating on those key concepts like anicca,
dukkha, anatta, i.e., vipassana meditation, and attain magga phala.
15. Not all citta get contaminated at the same level. A citta arises when one of our six sense faculties
makes a sense contact, and the level of contamination of the citta depends critically on what that
sense input is.
§ Let us take some examples. When we taste a delicious food or see an attractive object, greedy
thoughts may arise. But we know that we all don’t have the same cravings for a given object.
Some foods that some people crave can be repulsive to some others. In another example, a
given person may be liked by some but disliked by others (think about a famous politician).
§ Furthermore, we don’t generate defiled thoughts in many cases. Billions of citta flow through
our minds as we look at scenery passing by while riding in a car; they are mostly neutral, but
still are contaminated to a certain level.
§ But the level of contamination will be stronger when one sees an eye-catching object.
16. I have seen some people say citta that arise in a baby are pabhassara citta. One’s anusaya are
ALWAYS with oneself, whether it is a baby, animal, brahma, or any living being.
§ A baby’s brain has not developed so it cannot experience the world as we do, and it also cannot
express itself. But a baby’s citta are also contaminated due to anusaya being there.
§ Only when one attains magga phala that a part of one’s anusaya (and āsava and samyojana) is
removed permanently; see, “Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna“.
17. As one starts at the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna, and advance through Sakadāgāmī, Anāgāmī
stages to the Arahant stage, one’s avijjā (and thus bad gathi, anusaya, āsava, etc) decrease
permanently.
§ Thus a Sotāpanna‘s thoughts will not be defiled beyond a certain level of contamination.
Certainly, a Sotāpanna will not generate strong akusala citta that are capable of leading to
rebirth in the apāyas.
§ By the time one gets to the Anāgāmī stage, one has removed all kāmāsava (kāmā āsava), and
thus will not be tempted by any sensual object in the kāmā loka. Thus he/she will not be reborn
anywhere in the kāmā loka (four apāyas, human realm, and the six deva realms).
§ When one gets to the Arahant stage, one has removed all avijjā (and all bad gathi, anusaya,
āsava, etc): One has attained Nibbāna, and thus one will not reborn anywhere in the 31 realms
at death.
§ All above have been discussed in detail in many posts at the site. One can use the site map
“Pure Dhamma – Sitemap” or use the “Search” box on top right to look for posts for given key
word(s).
1. Today, we have three main “sects” of “Buddhism” that include the Theravāda Buddhism in Sri
Lanka, Burma, Thailand, and few other South Asian countries, Mahayana Buddhism in the form Zen
in Japan, China, and several other Asian countries, and Vajryana Buddhism in Tibet.
§ All sects are being practiced in other countries in varying degrees. How the original teachings
of the Buddha got branched out over 2500 years is discussed in, “Historical Timeline of
Edward Conze“.
2. The vast literature in Theravāda Buddhism, which is contained in the Tipiṭaka (three baskets of
Sutta, Vinaya, and Abhidhamma) are mostly self-consistent.
§ Considering the vastness of the material in these documents, the consistency is amazing, and
gives one confidence that any “contamination” would be small indeed.
3. However, even the Theravāda literature has been contaminated with incorrect interpretations of the
Tipiṭaka.
§ The root causes of misinterpretations of key terms are discussed at several posts below in this
section, but specifically two major historical events can be pointed out: “Buddhaghosa’s
Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis” and “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early
European Scholars“.
§ These inconsistencies were first pointed out by my teacher Thero who recently passed away,
and my goal with this website is to point out those errors and illustrate that those correct
interpretations provide a fully-consistent picture: “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
4. It is hard for me to fathom how a normal human being, regardless of how intelligent he is, could
teach the doctrine in such different ways over forty five years, yet be so consistent in multiple ways
(the discourses range from simple one-to-one question answer sessions with individuals to lengthy
discourses delivered to audiences of thousands of people, not to mention the complex Abhidhamma
material).
§ Even with the help of a computer, it is hard for me to keep track of the intricacy of
Abhidhamma. The complex workings of the mind has been analyzed in multiple ways, and they
are all consistent within the Abhidhamma and also with the Suttas.
5. Teachings of the Buddha, as given in the Theravāda Tipiṭaka, are confirmed and solidified with
each new scientific discovery (in contrast, the mythical aspects introduced in various forms of
Mahayana Buddhism are facing problems in light of scientific progress).
Buddha Dhamma is like a diamond covered in the dirt of ignorance. The more we find about the
world through scientific methods (thus removing more dirt from the diamond), the more of the
diamond’s luster become apparent. Not too far into the future, Buddha Dhamma will shine brightly
and will greatly help the humanity all over the world.
6. It is ironic in a way how the “materialistic science” is helping to clarify and confirm the teachings
of the “mind-based” Buddha Dhamma. Yet the humanity is still only enamored with the truly
amazing materialistic advances based on scientific discoveries, and is for most part unaware of its
primitive stage compared to ultimate knowledge contained in Buddha Dhamma.
§ The real breakthrough may come when science will be forced to embrace the mind as yet
another fundamental property of nature.
§ The discovery of quantum mechanics has clearly laid the foundation for this next breakthrough.
It has been more than hundred years since the advent of quantum mechanics, but it is only
within the past two to three decades that real progress has been made in this direction. I discuss
these developments in detail in the “Dhamma and Science” section.
1. Buddha Dhamma is undoubtedly the most complex “theory” in the world. It is truly amazing that
such a deep philosophical doctrine has survived over 2500 years.
§ However, we can be confident that the pure Dhamma still survives, because the three baskets of
sutta, vinaya, and abhidhamma were written down in 29 BCE when there were still numerous
Arahants were present.
§ After about 100 - 200 CE, people started translating the Tipiṭaka into Sanskrit and also the
Mahayana sect started writing their own suttas in Sanskrit; see, “Historical Timeline of Edward
Conze“.
2. Another important point to remember is that there is no single discourse in which the Buddha has
drawn together all the elements of his teaching and assigned them to their appropriate place within
some comprehensive system; see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Therefore, the same material was delivered in a variety of different ways over the 45-year
“ministry” of the Buddha. If some mistakes were made in the transmission of one of the suttas
or discourses, that would become apparent when compared with the numerous other discourses
or the Abhidhamma.
3. The Buddha tailored his discourses to his audience at hand. Thus his teachings that have been
transmitted encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from one-to-one conversations with people who
had particular questions in mind, to long discourses to audiences consisting of groups with wide
ranging mental capabilities.
§ If the Buddha realized that it was not fruitful to explain a deep concept to an individual, he
remained silent. One example cited is Buddha’s silence when a certain wanderer named
Vacchagotta asked him whether there was an atman or athma (permanent soul) or not. Even
though Buddha had clearly explained in Paṭicca Samuppāda that the concept of a lifestream
with changing “gathi“, in this case he remained in silence when Vacchagotta asked him the
question twice. Vacchagotta then left.
§ After Vacchagotta left, Buddha’s personal attendant, Ven. Ānanda, asked him why Buddha did
not explain the concept that it is not correct to say “there is no soul” or “there is a
soul” (because there is only an ever-changing lifestream) to Vacchagotta. The Buddha told
Ānanda that he did not think Vacchagotta was mentally capable at that time to understand the
concept, and that he did not want to confuse him. See the post, “What Reincarnates? – Concept
of a Lifestream” for the correct explanation.
§ It turned out that Vacchagotta later became a disciple and even attained Nibbāna through his
efforts.
4. Other times, he would enunciate invariable principles that stand at the heart of the teaching: for
example, Abhidhamma is a complete description of the working of the mind. The Buddha delivered
this Abhidhamma material in summary form to his chief disciple, Ven. Sariputta, and it was Ven.
Sariputta and his followers who expanded that summary to the form that we have today in the
Tipiṭaka; see, “Abhdhamma – Introduction“.
§ But in most cases, instead of trying to provide most thorough and intellectually deep answers,
he tried to find the best way to steer people to the truth according to their mental capabilities.
Some recent books have misrepresented such isolated one-to-one correspondence as indications
that some fundamental issues have not been addressed by the Buddha. They are probably
unaware that such questions have been answered in other suttas. I will point such instances as
they come up in other posts.
Next, “Misconceptions on the Topics the Buddha “Refused to Answer”“, …..
Coming back to the literature on the Theravāda Dhamma, the Buddha seems to have followed four
ways of treating questions: (1) Some should be answered directly, (2) others should be answered by
way of analyzing them, (3) yet others should be answered by counter-questions, and (4) there are
questions that should be put aside. As mentioned in the above section, depending on the audience he
chose the method that he deemed was appropriate.
He always told his disciples that they should not waste time worrying about such questions on the
universe, since they should be using the precious little time on the Earth in pursuit of Nibbāna. So,
questions on the characteristics of the universe was one that Buddha chose to put aside in REGULAR
question and answer sessions. A good example is when a monk named Malunkayaputta came to the
Buddha and asked a number of questions regarding the universe and stated that he will leave the
order if the Buddha refuses to answer them. The Buddha’s following answer illustrates the urgency
with which he asked the followers to “follow the path” diligently instead of wasting valuable time on
metaphysical questions.
The Buddha told Malunkayaputta, “Suppose Malunkayaputta, a man is wounded by a poisoned
arrow, and the friends and relatives bring him to a surgeon. Suppose the man should then say: “I will
not let this arrow be taken out until I know who shot me; whether he is a Ksatriya or a Brahmana or a
Vaisya or a Sudra (i.e., which caste); what his name and family may be; whether he is tall, short, or of
medium stature; whether his complexion is black, brown, or golden; from which village, town, or city
he comes. I will not let this arrow be taken out until I know the kind of bow with which I was shot;
the kind of bowstring used; the type of arrow; what sort of feather was used on the arrow and with
what kind of material the point of the arrow was made”. Malunkualputta, that man would die without
knowing any of these things. Even so, Malunkulaputta, if anyone says: “I will not follow the holy life
under the Blessed One until he answers these questions such as whether the universe is eternal or not,
etc.” he would die with these questions unanswered by the Blessed One”.
We have to look at this from the perspective of the “knowledge base” that existed at the time of the
Buddha. Think about the fact that starting with the Greek philosophers at the time of the Buddha (a
coincidence), the Western science took over 2500 years to reach the current level of understanding of
the universe. Even a mere two hundred years ago, the scientific understanding was limited to the
Solar system and basically nothing beyond that. Now we know that there are billions of galaxies,
each with billions of stars (most of which have planetary systems like our Solar system), and that all
this started with the big bang. This transition was slow and took the genius and courage of people like
Galileo who sometimes sacrificed their lives to bring out the truth.
Twenty five hundred years ago, there was no rational way that the Buddha could have “explained”
concepts such as the origin of the universe, extent of the universe, etc. Therefore, even though he
clearly stated the existence of “innumerable world systems” in order to lay down the basis of
consciousness (see “Consciousness – A Dhamma Perspective“), he refused to discuss such concepts
with individuals simply because it would have been a waste of time given the limited base knowledge
existed at that time. If the Buddha was teaching his doctrine today, I believe that he would have
answered such questions directly, because the vocabulary and background knowledge for doing so is
available today.
However, Buddha’s perspectives on the universe is apparent in his teachings on Abhidamma (and
also in some main Suttas). This is because the fundamental aspects of the universe (infinite in space
and time) are inherent in the doctrine. Those principles are embedded in the teachings, but the
Buddha avoided giving answers to specific questions, especially from individuals, because it would
have totally confused those people.
Some people used examples as mentioned above to state that the Buddha refused to answer any
questions related to the origin of the universe or that his position on the existence of a soul was not
very clear. That is not the case at all. The Buddha’s main concern at any given instance was to
provide an answer that the audience at hand was able to comprehend. If the correct answer would
have befuddled the audience, he remained silent on that particular question. He has described the
evolvement of life on this planet in the Agganna Sutta. But please do not read the published
translated versions, because the translations are embarrassingly flawed.
Therefore, one should not come to certain conclusions by reading just a few discourses, and needs to
pay attention in what context the discourse was delivered. It is always possible to refer to
Abhidhamma to clarify issues, since it is written in a methodical way. So, the texts of the oldest Pāli
texts contain Buddha’s teachings in a variety of forms, ranging from simple interpretations of
Dhamma to its very deep philosophical aspects in the Abhidhamma as well as some of the Suttas. Yet
the contents in all this vast material remains self-consistent when one examines the contents with the
correct perspective. We owe a deep gratitude to the Saṅgha of Sri Lanka for keeping this material
intact.
Next, “Preservation of the Dhamma“
1. It is said that the Buddha advised not to translate the Tipiṭaka material word-by-word into
any other language. Instead, commentaries were written to explain the Pāli material in the Tipiṭaka
in condensed form fit for listening, retention, recitation, memorization, and repetition – the five major
elements in oral transmission.
§ This is a very important point. For example, the Buddha orally delivered the main Suttas over
many hours; the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana Sutta was delivered over several days to the five
ascetics. For easy transmission, these discourses were SUMMARIZED in Magadhi (and that
particular format of “lining up” was termed Pāli); see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Each line, sometimes even a word in a Sutta needs a further explanation; see, “Satipaṭṭhāna
Sutta – Structure” and follow-up posts. Such “explanatory texts” or “commentaries” were
originally written in Sinhala and were called “Sinhala Atthakata”.
§ Commentaries in Sinhala accumulated for centuries and in the fourth or fifth century CE, these
commentaries were translated to Pāli (and edited with his own ideas incorporated) by
Buddhaghosa. Subsequently, most of the original Sinhala commentaries were lost, and
today we only have the edited summaries of Buddhaghosa where he incorporated his own
ideas.
§ Fortunately, three of the original commentaries (“Sinhala Atthakata”) have been preserved in
the Tipiṭaka; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma“.
2. Among the commentaries to the Tipiṭaka, those on the Abhidhamma are dominated by the three
commentaries of Buddhaghosa: (i) the atthasalini, “The Expositor”, the commentary to the
Dhammasangani, (ii) the Sammohavinodani, “The Dispeller of Delusion”, the commentary to the
Vibhanga, and (iii) the Pancappakarana Atthakatha, the combined commentary to the other five
treatises.
§ But it must be remembered that Buddhaghosa wrote those commentaries with his own ideas as
a former Hindu Brahmin. The original Tipiṭaka remains unaltered, including those three
original commentaries (“Sinhala Atthakata”) mentioned above.
3. In addition to writing those commentaries on the Tipiṭaka while he was in Sri Lanka, Buddhghosa
also wrote the Visuddhimagga (The Path of Purification) around 430 CE, which is considered to be
an important treatise on Theravāda doctrine. This is wrongly considered to be a comprehensive
manual condensing the theoretical and practical teaching of the Buddha, and some consider it to be
the most important Theravāda text outside of the Tipiṭaka Canon of scriptures.
§ I will point out many problems with Buddhaghosa’s writings – including Visuddhimagga — at
this site.
§ The most common problems include: misinterpretation of Ānāpānasati bhāvanā as “breath
meditation”; see, “7. What is Änapāna?” and “Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta“.
§ He also incorporated kasina meditations, which are anariya meditations and are not Ariya
meditation techniques. In Ariya (or true Buddhist) meditations, the object of meditation is
Nibbāna, not a mundane object like a kasina object.
4. This is critical issue since most current Theravāda institutions teach mainly the works of
Buddhaghosa, since those works are supposed to be reliable summaries of the teachings in the
Tipiṭaka. Therefore, it is good to have the works of Buddhaghosa reviewed extensively.
§ I will point out the most important misrepresentations on this website, based on what I have
learned from my teacher Thero in Sri Lanka. The Dhamma that I present here is, in my opinion,
the correct interpretation of the Tipiṭaka. I hope you will come to that conclusion on careful
examination of the material.
§ More details can be found in “Incorrect Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline” and
other posts in the “Historical Background” section.
5. After Emperor Asoka’s reign, no further steps were taken to hold back the inevitable Brahminic
influence on Buddhism in India, and Buddhism went through a gradual decline in India (despite or
even because of the resurgent philosophical activity led by Nagarjuna, Asanga, Vasubhanudhu, and
others around the beginning of the first millennium) and virtually disappeared from India during the
first millennium.
6. The Mahayana version of Buddhism started with the works of Nagarjuna, who, in all likelihood
had best intentions for the promotion of Buddhism (even though he was naive enough to assume that
Buddha Dhamma can be refined for the “new ages”).
§ These refinements became major revisions by the time D. T. Suzuki’s books were written in the
early 1900’s, and the original teachings were badly distorted. This is the reason why I am so
obsessive about making sure that my essays are compatible with the original teachings of the
Buddha.
7. All these distortions in both Mahayana and Theravāda versions have their origins in various
philosophers (such as Nagarjuna and Buddhaghosa) trying to interpret Buddha Dhamma in terms of
mundane concepts; see, “Buddha Dhamma: Non-Perceivability and Self-Consistency“.
§ However, as pointed out in that post, it is easy to point out the inconsistencies with such
mundane interpretations by Nagarjuana, Buddhaghosa, and others, especially with the evidence
gained by the scientific advances made during the past few hundred years.
§ And such scientific evidence and the ones that are yet to be discovered will only confirm the
pure Dhamma that stays intact in the Tipiṭaka to the day, as also pointed out in that post.
Next, “Preservation of Dhamma“, ………
1. The Buddha’s teaching were handed down mostly verbally from one generation to the next over
three to four hundred years before it was written down in a comprehensive manner.
§ The reason that it survived almost fully in content is due to the way it was composed into a
form that is suitable for easy verbal transmission, in SUMMARY form in most cases; see,
“Sutta – Introduction“.
§ Today, complete record of the Buddha’s teachings, the Pāli Canon, is preserved in the Tipiṭaka
in 37 volumes, see, “WebLink: store.pariyatti.org: Tipiṭaka PTS (Pali Canon English
Translation)“. According to the above link, 33 volumes are available in English, but in my
opinion many translations are not correct.
2. The discourses of the Buddha that were delivered in Magadhi were condensed and written down;
this written form was called Pāli. But Pāli does not have its own script, so it was written down with
Sinhala script.
§ This provides a clear way of sorting out the Mahayana literature, which was written in
Sanskrit, and never written in Pāli; thus all the Sanskrit suttas were written by
Mahayanic philosophers.
§ Around the turn of the first millennium, translations of the Tipiṭaka to Chinese and
subsequently to Tibetan also took place. Thus the original manuscripts in Pāli can be expected
to contain most of the original discourses delivered by the Buddha.
3. Today, it is hard to fathom (especially for Westerners) that such level of accuracy could have been
maintained in a verbally-transmitted material.
§ However, we need to understand the background traditions and also the determination of the
monks over thousands of years that helped preserve most of the original teachings.
§ Even today, there are people who have memorized large sections of the Tipiṭaka, especially
in Myanmar (formerly Burma). In Myanmar, there are special examinations to test these
memorizations; see, “WebLink: myanmarnet.net: TIPITAKADHARA SAYADAWS OF
MYANMAR ( BURMA ) IN FIVE DECADES“. Also see, “WebLink: dhammadharo:
Memorizing the Tipiṭaka“.
§ During the period of oral transmission, there were groups of bhukkhus who memorized
(overlapping) sections of the Tipiṭaka. Then during a Sangāyanā (Buddhist Council), they
all got together and compared each others versions to make sure they were all compatible.
4. A major reason for the assembly of the First Buddhist Council within three months of the Buddha’s
Parinibbāna was to organize the vast material.
§ Within the next two hundred years, two more Councils were held to recite and verify the
teachings, and to finalize the Tipiṭaka in three broad categories (“ti” + “pitaka” or “three
baskets”). The second was held about a century after the first one.
§ The third was held in 250 BC at Pataliputra under the patronage of King Asoka. The “three
baskets” were completed at this Council.
§ It was this completed Tipiṭaka that was written down in 29 BCE at the Fourth Buddhist
Council, in Matale, Sri Lanka.
5. A critical point here is that a sutta is a CONDENSED version of a discourse in many cases.
For example, the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana sutta was delivered to the five ascetics overnight.
Imagine how many written pages that would be if written verbatim! Yet it was summarized in a few
pages. The same is true for all the important suttas. Otherwise it would have been impossible to
transmit all those thousands of suttas;
§ The Buddha delivered most of his discourses in the Maghadhi (maghadhi = “maga” + “adhi” or
Noble path) language. Tipiṭaka was written in Pāli with Sinhala script; Pāli is a version of
Maghadhi suitable for writing down oral discourses in summary form suitable for transmission.
§ Each Pāli word is packed with lot of information, and thus commentaries (called “attha katha“)
were written to expound the meaning of important Pāli words, and to explain the key phrases in
the suttas.
§ Thus the Tipiṭaka was meant to be used with the commentaries. Pāli suttas are not
supposed to be translated word-by-word; see, “Sutta – Introduction“.
§Most of those Sinhala commentaries were burned down in the Anuradhapura era; see,
“Incorrect Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
§ Fortunately, three original commentaries written by the main disciples of the Buddha (Ven.
Sariputta, Ven. Kaccayana, etc) during the time of the Buddha had been included in the
Tipiṭaka (in the Khuddhaka Nikāya), and thus survived. The current revival of pure Dhamma by
the two Theros in Sri Lanka is partially due to their perusal of these three documents
(Patisambhidamagga, Petakopadesa, and Nettippakarana).
6. With the loss of most of the commentaries and the non-prominence of the surviving three
commentaries mentioned above, people started translating the Tipiṭaka word by word. The problem
was compounded by the increase usage of the Sanskrit language beginning around the first century
CE.
§ For example, “anicca” was translated first to Sanskrit as “anitya” and then the same Sanskrit
word “anitya” was ADOPTED as the Sinhala translation for anicca. Similarly, “anatta” was
translated to Sanskrit as “anathma” and again was adopted as the Sinhala word for “anatta“.
This itself has been responsible for preventing millions of people attaining Nibbāna for all
these years; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ Another good example is the translation of paṭicca samuppāda to Sanskrit as
Pratītyasamutpāda; see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda – “Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda”. I think it is
NOT POSSIBLE to translate some key Pāli words to Sanskrit or English or any other language
without losing the true meaning. This is the reason that I am going to just keep the original
words in some cases and just explain what it is; also see, “Anantara and Samanantara Paccaya”
or words like taṇhā and Nibbāna.
7. The Buddha had foreseen this and warned not to translate the Tipiṭaka to ANY LANGUAGE, and
particularly to Sanskrit. There were two Brahmins by the names of Tepula and Yameru who were
experts on the Vedic Texts; they became bhikkhus and asked the Buddha whether they should
translate the suttas to Sanskrit.
§ That is when the Buddha admonished them that Sanskrit was a language with musical
overtones developed by the high-minded Brahmins and thus it was not possible to convey the
true meanings of Maghadhi words in Sanskrit; see, WebLink: suttacentral: Chulavagga 5.33.
§ In the Sutta Central English translation, the Pali word for Sanskrit (chandasa) is translated
incorrectly as, “metrical”; see, “WebLink: suttacentral: 15. Minor matters (Khuddaka)” which
is the translation of “WebLink: suttacentral: 1. Khuddakavatthu“. The relevant Pali text is
located close to the end, and starts as, “Tena kho pana samayena yameḷakekuṭā nāma…”.
8. One grave problem we have today is the many people try to translate a given sutta word by
word to another language. Thus the Dhamma Cakka Pavattana sutta that we mentioned above is
translated to a few pages. \
§ For a comprehensive translation of that sutta: “Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta“.
§ That is why most of the existing translations are inadequate at best and erroneous in most
“Sutta – Introduction“.
cases; see,
9. Another important point is that even up to the 20th century, the whole Tipiṭaka was written on
specially prepared ola (palm) leaves. They deteriorate over 100 years or so and needed to re-written.
Even though that was a very labor-intensive process (there are about 60 large volumes in the modern
printed version of the Tipiṭaka), it served another important purpose.
§ Sinhala language (both spoken and written) changed over the past 2000 years. The need to re-
write it every 100 or so years made sure that the changes in Sinhala script was taken into
account ; of course Pāli language has not changed at all.
§ The following video gives an idea about how those leaves were prepared and what tools were
used to write with:
WebLink: youtube: Ola Leaf manuscripts
10. Finally, just before the Sinhala commentaries were burned down, Buddhaghosa translated and
edited those commentaries back to Pāli in his Visuddhimagga and other books.
§ Even though he had made many errors (like including kasina meditation and substituting the
ānāpānasati bhāvanā with “breath meditation”), he had actually used the words anicca and
anatta in the Pāli version of the Visuddhimagga; see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A
Focused Analysis“.
§ Thus the incorrect translations of the words “anicca” and “anatta” may have happened long
before him probably in the first to second century CE; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and
Anatta by Early European Scholars“.
Timeline of Preparation of Dhamma Suitable for Transmission
The following a summary of the technical details that may not be of interest to many. It is for the sake
of completeness.
Shortly after the Buddha passed away, Ven. Mahakassapa, the de facto head of the Saṅgha, selected
five hundred monks, all Arahants (those who have attained Nibbāna), to meet and compile an
authoritative version of the teachings. This first Buddhist council was held three months after the
Parinibbāna at Rajagaha the capital of Magadha. The cullavagga, one of the books of the Pāli Vinaya
Pitaka, gives an account of how the authorized texts were compiled at the First Buddhist Council: On
the basis of Venerable Upali’s recitation of Vinaya, the Vinaya Pitaka, the compilation on
disciplinary matters was compiled. Venerable Ānanda then recited “the Dhamma” or the Sutta
Pitaka, i.e., the discourses, and on the basis of this recitation the Sutta Pitaka, the Compilation of
Discourses, was compiled (Venerable Ānanda was supposed to have an amazing memory and had
memorized all the Suttas preached by the Buddha). The Abhidamma was rehearsed by all the
Arahants present at the Council. Although parts of the Abhidhamma were recited at these earlier
Buddhist Councils, it was not until the Third Council that it became fixed into its present form as the
third and final Pitaka of the Canon.
§ The proceedings of the Third Council compiled by the Moggaliputta-tissa thera in the
Kathavatthu, that became part of the Tipiṭaka (Three Baskets). It was during the Third Council
that the final version of the Tipiṭaka (as available today) was compiled. It finalized the
Abhidhamma pitaka, and added several books on the Khuddhaka Nikāya, in addition to the
Kathavatthu.
The composition of the Tipiṭaka is as follows:
1. The Vinaya Pitaka is composed of five books: Major Offenses (Prajika Pāli), Minor Offenses
(Pacittiya Pāli), Greater Section (Mahavagga Pāli), Smaller Section (Culavagga Pāli), and Epitome
of the Vinaya (Parivara Pāli).
2. The Sutta Pitaka consists of five Nikāyas: Digha Nikāya (Collection of Long Discourses),
Majjhima Nikāya (Collection of Middle-Length Courses), Saṃyutta Nikāya (Collection of Kindred
Sayings), Anguttara Nikāya (Collection of Discourses arranged in accordance with number), and
Khuddaka Nikāya (Smaller Collection).
3. The Abhidamma Pitaka consists of the following categories: Dhamma Sangani (Classification of
Dharmas), Vibhanga (The Book of Divisions), Kathavatthu (Points of Controversy) which was
actually compiled by venerable Moggaliputta Tissa at the Third Buddhist Council, Puggala Pannatti
(Description of Individuals), Dhatukatha (Discussion with Reference to Elements), Yamaka (The
Book of the Pairs), and Paṭṭhāna (The Book of Relations).
§ Again, all these 37 books are collectively termed the Tipiṭaka (Three Baskets) or the Pāli
Canon.
It is this enlarged Canon completed at the Third Council that was committed to writing in Sri Lanka
in the first century BCE (29 BCE) at the Aluvihara Monastery at the Fourth Buddhist Council. The
material in Pāli was written down in Sinhala language (Pāli does not have its own script). This huge
collection was written down on palm leaves with a stilo, a pointed steel dagger-like instrument, which
scratched the letters into the soft leaves. An ink made from berries was rubbed over the whole page
and then gently removed, so that only the indentations retained the color. It is said that Tipiṭaka was
also written down on gold leaves as well.
§ It must be mentioned that Theravāda Buddhism was brought to Burma and Thailand from Sri
Lanka in the first century CE; over the next two centuries it diffused into adjoining countries of
Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, and survives in its purity in those countries as well to the
present day. (In Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge regime in the 1970’s massacred most of the
monks, and the Buddha Dhamma is virtually extinct).
§ While the Saṅgha (with the aid of most of the kings) in Sri Lanka took pride and honor in
keeping the teachings intact, Buddhism went through many changes in India, as well as in
China, Japan, and Tibet, and then finally disappeared altogether from India around 1200 CE.
Next, “Historical Timeline of David Conze“, ……….
Edward Conze was a Mahayana scholar, and translated the Mahayana Prajnaparamita or Perfection of
Wisdom sutras from original Sanskrit to English. See, WebLink: WIKI: Edward Conze
(It must be noted that any Sanskrit suttas are Mahayana suttas that were composed by Mahayana
philosophers like Nagarjuna (who were just intellectuals, and not Arahants) and are NOT original
suttas delivered by the Buddha).
Conze was impressed with those Mahayana suttas, and in the book, “On Indian Mahayana
Buddhism” (1968) he compiled works of the Mahayana/Zen scholar D. T. Suzuki. Even though his
bias towards Mahayana suttas are clear, I selected his timeline which clearly shows how Mahayana
scholars wrote their own suttas and tried later to attribute those to the Buddha.
This historical timeline is discussed in detail by Edward Conze in his book, “A Short History of
Buddhism” (1980). According to Conze, the history of Buddhism can be conveniently divided into
four periods:
1. The old Buddhism, which largely coincided with what later came to be known as Theravāda
2. Rise of Mahayana,
3. Rise of the Tantra (Vajryana) and Ch’an (Zen),
4. No further divisions.
The first period is roughly 500 years; second and third periods roughly cover the first thousand years
of the current era (CE); the last thousand years can be considered as the fourth period. During this
whole period the Theravāda Dhamma was kept mostly intact. In the following description, it is also
clear some of the differences between the original teachings and the Mahayana ideology.
In the following I will present this story verbatim as told by Conze (starting at p. 45 of his
book):
“……About 100 BCE (roughly 400 years after the Buddha’s Parinibbāna) a number of Buddhists in
India felt that the existing statements of the doctrine had become stale and useless. In the conviction
that Dhamma required ever new re-formulations so as to meet the needs of new ages, new
populations and new social circumstances, they set out to produce new literature which ultimately
came to known as Mahayana Buddhism. The creation of this literature is one of the most significant
outbursts of creative energy known to human history and it was sustained for about four to five
centuries. Repetition alone, they believed, cannot sustain a living religion. Unless counterbalanced by
constant innovation, it will become fossilized and lose its life-giving qualities, they believed.
So far the Mahayanistic attitude seems quite logical. What is more difficult to understand is that they
insisted in presenting the new writings, manifestly composed centuries after the Buddha’s
Parinibbāna, as the very words of the Buddha himself. They followed the Mahasanghikas in
minimizing the importance of the historical Gautama Buddha, whom they replaced by the Buddha
who is the embodiment of Dhamma (dharmakaya). In the “Lotus of the Good Law”, we are told that
the Buddha, far from having reached his enlightenment at Bodhgaya, abides for eons and eons, from
eternity to eternity, and that He preaches the Law at all times in countless places and innumerable
disguises.
……..Not content with this, the Mahayanists tried to link their own writings with the historical
Buddha by a number of mythological fictions. They asserted that they had been preached by the
Buddha in the course of his life on Earth, that parallel to the (First Buddhist) Council at Rajagaha,
which codified the Suttas of the Theravāda, the Mahayana suttas had been codified by an assembly of
Bodhisattvas on the mythical mountain of Vimalasvabhava; that the texts had been miraculously
preserved for five centuries and stored away in the subterranean palaces of the Nagas, or with the
king of the Gandharvas, or the king of the Gods. Then, as Nagarjuna puts it, “five hundred years after
the Buddha’s Nirvana, when the Good Law, after having gradually declined, was in great danger”,
these treasures from the past were unearthed, revealed and made known, so as to revivify the
doctrine.
What then were the main doctrinal innovations of the Mahayana? They can be summarized under five
headings:
1. As concerns the goal there is a shift from the Arhat-ideal to the Bodhisattva-ideal;
2. A new way of salvation is worked out, in which compassion ranks equal with wisdom, and
which is marked by the gradual advance through six “perfections” (paramita);
3. Faith is given a new range by being provided with a new pantheon of deities, or rather of
persons more than divine;
4. “Skill in means” (upayakausalya), an entirely new virtue, becomes essential to the saint, and is
placed even above wisdom, the highest virtue so far;
5. A coherent ontological doctrine is worked out, dealing with such items as “Emptiness”,
“Suchness”, etc”.
We will now consider these one by one.
1. The goal of Arhantship is now relegated to the second place. The Mahayanists strive to to be a
“Bodhisattva”. A Bodhisattva is distinguished by three features: (a) In his essential being he is
actuated by the desire to win the full enlightenment of a Buddha, (b) He is dominated by two forces,
in equal proportion, i.e., by compassion and wisdom. From compassion he selflessly postpones his
entrance into the bliss of Nirvana so as to help suffering creatures,…….. (c) Although intent on
ultimate purity, a Bodhisattva remains in touch with ordinary people by having the same passions
they have. His passions, however, do not either affect or pollute his mind.
2. A Bodhisattva’s compassion is called “great”, because it is boundless and makes no distinctions…
.. This enlightenment does not automatically entail the desire to assist others. Among the enlightened
they distinguish three types, two of them “selfish”, one “unselfish”. The “selfish” types are Arhants
and Pratyekabuddhas, who are said to represent the idea of the Hinayana, of the “inferior vehicle”.
The “unselfish” ones are the Buddhas, and the pursuit of the unselfish quest for enlightenment on the
part of a Bodhisattva is called the “Buddha-vehicle”, of the “Great Vehicle” (mahā-yana).
A Bodhisattva must be a patient man. He wants to become a Buddha, but his distance from the
transcendental perfection of a supreme Buddha, who both knows and is everything, will obviously be
infinte. In one life it could not possibly be traversed. Countless lives would be needed and a
Bodhisattva must be prepared to wait for eons and eons before he can reach his goal. Yet, he is
separated from the Buddhahood only by one single obstacle, i.e., his belief in a personal self. To get
rid of himself is the Bodhisattva’s supreme task. By two kinds of measures he tries to remove himself
– actively by self-sacrifice and selfless service, cognitively by insight into the objective non-existence
of a self. The first is due to compassion, the second to wisdom.
The unity of compassion and wisdom is acted out by the six “perfections”, or “paramita”, the six
“methods by which we go to the Beyond”. A person turns into a Bodhisattva when he first resolves to
win full enlightenment for the benefit of all beings. The six are: the perfections of giving, morality,
patience, vigor, meditation, and wisdom”.
This ends the quotation from Edward Conze’s book. (I have not added or edited anything other
than to skip some text in order to make it concise).
I agree with Conze’s analysis except for the statement in the very first paragraph: “The creation of
this literature is one of the most significant outbursts of creative energy known to human history and
it was sustained for about four to five centuries.” This literature, even though voluminous, only made
a simple theory much more seemingly confusing, and contradictory. We will discuss this in a follow-
up post. The only fortunate thing about is that it is written entirely in Sanskrit, and thus is easy to
distinguish from the original teachings written in Pāli Tipiṭaka.
In addition to the “improvements” that were added in India, further material associated with national
customs were added when Mahayana Buddhism spread to China, Japan, and Tibet (and came to
known by different names such Zen, Vajrayana, etc.).
So, the premise of the Mahayana re-formulation of the Buddha Dhamma was to “refine and improve”
the Dhamma of the Buddha. This is in sharp contradiction with one of the most fundamental concepts
in Dhamma that only a Buddha can discover these laws of nature and BY DEFINITION, it is not
possible to improve upon them. They themselves admit that a Buddha appears in the world after long
times, and thus their attempt to change Buddha Dhamma is one of the basic contradictions in
Mahayana.
What we need to understand is the basic difference between Buddha Dhamma and any other human
endeavor: All other human endeavors involve cumulative effort of many, whether it is science,
philosophy, engineering, etc.; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction“. And all those efforts are
made within the system, using the knowledge acquired by the experience within the system; see,
“Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem“. A Buddha transcends the human realm, and discovers the
“whole existence” of the 31 realms; see, “The Grand Unified Theory of Dhamma“. The Mahayanists
took that world view, which is not accessible to normal human beings but only to a Buddha, and then
added their own theories that only complicates that “already seemingly esoteric” picture. This is why
there are so many apparent contradictions in “Buddhism” today. Adding more “pluff”, which is
wrong anyway by definition, only distorts the correct picture. My goal here is to provide a consistent
picture using the accepted scientific methods.
Next, “Background on the Current Revival of Buddha Dhamma“, …………
1. In 2014, I participated in an online discussion group on “Buddhism” for a few days. Couple of
things that struck me were:
§ There are a lot of people out there who see that there is something valuable in Buddha
Dhamma. But there is lot of confusion, because there are so many conflicting ideas brought up
and discussed without reaching a conclusion.
§ Each person seems to have their own version, their own “theory” what Dhamma really is. In
many forums, instead of having a honest discussion about what ideas are right and what are
wrong, many people use the forums for “entertainment”. It is their “coffee break” to sit around
and show off their “knowledge” and “wisdom”. (I must say that I regularly participated in a
couple of other discussion groups in 2014 where people seemed to be genuinely interested
in having an open exchange of ideas; due to lack of time, I don’t participate in such
discussions any more).
2. It is a good idea to first decide what the goal of such a forum is. I think the goal should be to find
and confirm the core ideas that the Buddha taught 2500 years ago. Let us get rid of all these different
labels, Mahayana, Theravāda, etc.. Since it does not appear to happen any time soon, I have decided
to just present what I have found. I call it Buddha Dhamma. And that is what was called until the
term “Buddhism” came into vogue in the 19th century.
3. I have two key points to make:
§ We can remove many bad ideas that crept into Dhamma by looking at the historical “evolution”
of “Buddhism”; The main problem of “evolution” of Dhamma is that it is not a germ idea that
needs to be nurtured and refined: Buddha Dhamma is the set of ultimate natural laws that a
Buddha DISCOVERS after long times. Now, one can be skeptical about that, and that is
perfectly fine. Confidence in that belief comes by critically examining the evidence, and it may
come later. But let us make that assumption, because that is a key idea in Buddha Dhamma:
That it is a rare event that a human being can discover the ultimate laws of nature; see, “Power
of the Human Mind – introduction“, and the follow-up posts.
§ Modern science can be another useful tool in finding the truth or fallacy of some concepts
involved; the “theories” of science are continually being tested and verified by thousand of
independent scientists, so even though they are not infallible, they are better than many
speculations by individuals. And there is a key difference in finding the nature’s laws via the
scientific method and the way a Buddha finds them; see, “Dhamma and Science –
Introduction“.
I will use both these tools in presenting my case.
4. The goal (and the motivation) in finding true Dhamma (or any kind of true salvation for those who
believe in any other religion or belief system) is different compared to a philosophical debate. One
could possibly “win an argument” in a philosophical debate especially if “winning” means
persuading more people in the audience. One could thus “win a debate”, but deep inside one knows
the argument has flaws. It is like winning court case, and freeing a criminal. The criminal (and may
be even the lawyer) knows that he/she committed the crime. Even though the consequences will not
be paid in a prison, they will be paid according to the Dhamma or the nature’s laws.
5. If we can recover those correct laws that the Buddha taught, then we can gain the benefits of
knowing those laws and following them for our benefit. It is not about winning an argument. It is
ALL about finding the truth for oneself. If what Buddha said is true, then this world is much more
complex than most people think, and there is much more suffering to be had, if one does not use the
remaining time in this life wisely.
6. Then there is this naive argument out there that says: “All religions work for the good of the
mankind. Do not criticize any religion or any sect within Buddhism”. But some of those people also
say, “Our sect of Buddhism is the best version because we are so compassionate that we will not
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1214 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
attain Enlightenment until EVERYONE is ready”. As we will see below, this oath itself is against one
of the five precepts in Buddha Dhamma, that of promising not to lie. I am not going to talk about
other religions, but I am going to point out the flaws in many existing versions of “Buddhism” today,
because that is the compassionate thing to do.
7. If one is truly compassionate, one should try to find the true Dhamma (because there is only one
set of natural laws), and then SHARE it with anyone who would be interested. Dhamma is not
something that anyone can GIVE to anyone else. Even the Buddha could only teach those who would
listen to him. Some people even question the compassion of the Buddha when they hear this story
from the Tipiṭaka:
§ There was a butcher named Cundasukara who lived right next door to the Jetawanaramaya,
where the Buddha resided for a long time. Some may wonder why the Buddha did not try to
“save” Cundasukara by teaching him the right path. Actually, there were some bhikkhus who
could hear the screams of the pigs being slaughtered and asked the Buddha why he would not
try to teach Dhamma to Cundasukara. The Buddha told them that Cundasukara would accrue
much more bad kamma if he tried to do that. Killing pigs leads to accumulation of much bad
kamma, but unimaginable bad kamma could be accumulated by having hateful thoughts
towards a Buddha: see, “How to Evaluate Weights of Different Kamma“. One could
accumulate more bad kamma by hurting the feelings of a human being than by killing an
animal, and hateful thoughts towards a Buddha can be infinitely worse than hurting a normal
human being. Therefore, sometimes the true compassion can be hidden.
§ In my way of thinking, I would not be acting compassionately if I did not point out these flaws
in both Mahayana and Theravāda, because I have experienced the benefits of the true and pure
Dhamma.
§ My goal is not to try to “convert” anyone to anything. The Buddha did not try to convert
anybody. It is up to each person to make their own decisions, because one is responsible for
one’s own future, and no one else is. Most of us are lucky to live in societies where we can
make our own decisions.
§ As I keep emphasizing, Buddha Dhamma describes the ultimate laws of nature. Anyone with
any religious background, or an atheist, can follow Dhamma and should be able to see that it
does describe the laws of nature. However, it is critical to find the true Dhamma. The only way
to do that is to check for consistency at ALL TIMES, and to weed out the bad versions.
8. In the following few posts we will examine the problems in many different versions of Mahayana
and also in Theravāda. If you see any flaws in my arguments, please send me a comment. It is
possible that I could make a mistake, and if so I will correct them. I hope all those who read these
posts will keep an open mind, because all of us should have the same goal: finding the pure Dhamma
which will be beneficial to us all.
Next, “Key Problems with Mahayana Teachings“, …………….
1. The main problem is a conflict with a very fundamental tenet of Buddha Dhamma. That a Buddha
comes to this world after very long times and DISCOVERS the laws of nature by his efforts.
Mahāyānists agree that it takes eons of time to fulfill the “paramitas” and to become a Buddha.
§ Then they turn around and say that Buddha Dhamma needed to be “refined” for the changing
times; see “Background on the Current Revival of Buddha Dhamma“. How can the ultimate
laws of nature discovered by a Buddha be “refined” or “revised”? No one has answered this
basic question.
2. The first thing one is supposed to do in becoming a “Mahāyāna Buddhist” is to take the
“Bodhisattva vow.” They say each being should endeavor to become a Buddha, i.e., each person
should be a Bodhisattva.
§ Those who initiated this idea a long time ago probably did not have any idea that there is an
infinite number of sentient beings in this world. Each human body has an amazingly large
number of microscopic beings. See, “There are as many creatures on your body as there are
people on Earth!“.
§ There are 1000 trillion of just ants on this Earth: WebLink: ASK: Q: How many ants are there
in the world?. Or do they not count other living beings?
§ We know that there have not been a significant number of Arahants for past 1800 years. Is
there any realistic way for trillions of beings to attain Aranhathood, let alone Buddhahood?
§ In this eon (basically the time duration of a universe or about 30 billion years), there have been
four Buddhas. One more Buddha is to appear. That is truly an exception. Before this eon, there
were 30 eons (trillion years!) that did not have a single Buddha appearing. So, how long would
one to have wait to become a Buddha, i.e., remain a Bodhisattva? And will all beings (or even
the human population today) be able to become Buddhas in the same eon let alone at the
same time? Are they serious?
3. Within 500 years of the passing away of the Buddha, the Indian Mahāyānists started not only
refining but incorporating concepts that were alien to Buddha Dhamma. If it needed refining just after
500 years, how come they have not kept up with the updating process? One would think they would
be doing a signigicant revision these days with so much changes in science and technology.
4. Those who started this revision process did not understand the central idea of Nibbāna. They never
mention concepts like anicca, dukkha, anatta. So, they defined those in their own terms and then got
into a slippery slope in trying to explain those terms by inventing more concepts. It snowballed, and
in the words of Edward Conze, who translated many Mahāyāna texts to English:
§ “……About 100 BCE (roughly 400 years after the Buddha’s Parinibbāna) a number of
Buddhists in India felt that the existing statements of the doctrine had become stale and useless.
They were convinced that Dhamma required ever new re-formulations so as to meet the needs
of new ages, new populations, and new social circumstances. So they set out to produce new
literature which ultimately came to known as Mahāyāna Buddhism. The creation of this
literature was one of the most significant outbursts of creative energy known to human history
and it was sustained for about four to five centuries. Repetition alone, they believed, cannot
sustain a living religion. Unless counterbalanced by constant innovation, it will become
fossilized and lose its life-giving qualities, they believed”.
§ (see, “Historical Timeline of Edward Conze“).
For someone who is not familiar with the original teachings of the Buddha, those philosophical
arguments could look impressive, as they did for Edward Conze. We will examine those concepts in
detail in upcoming posts. I have discussed the concept of “emptiness”; see the link below.
§ The Buddha did warn of this outcome: He said: “there will be other versions that look like
Dhamma and feels like Dhamma. Just like when there are imitations of gold coming to the
market, the real gold goes underground” (WebLink: suttacentral: Saddhamma Patirupaka Sutta
(SN 16.13)). That has been the case for over 1800 years.
§ But the truth comes out eventually. That time could well be now. The correct interpretations of
anicca, dukkha, anatta have been hidden for many hundreds of years.
6. So what are these revisions that the Mahāyāna forefathers made?
Edward Conze has listed five doctrinal “innovations” of the Mahayanists; see, “Historical Timeline
of Edward Conze.” They are:
§ As concerns the goal, there is a shift from the Arahant-ideal to the Bodhisattva-ideal;
§ A new way of salvation was worked out, in which compassion ranked equal with wisdom.
§ Faith is given a new range by being provided with a new pantheon of deities.
§ “Skill in means” (upayakausalya), an entirely new virtue, becomes essential to the practitioner.
That is placed even above wisdom, the highest virtue in the Buddha Dhamma.
§ A coherent ontological doctrine was worked out, dealing with such items as “Emptiness”,
“Suchness”, etc.
We will point out the critical contradictions of each of these revisions with the Buddha’s original
teachings (see i-v below) and will go into details later on.
i. The basic idea of Buddha Dhamma is that each human being has a unique mind. But greed,
hate, and ignorance defile a mind. Because of that, each person commits immoral acts and
subsequently “pay for those actions”, suffering is the net result in the cycle of rebirths. One
gets out this cycle of rebirths by purifying one’s mind; one who has accomplished this task is
an Arahant. No person can purify another person’s mind. Nibbāna is not an abstract concept.
See the subsection “Nibbāna.”
ii. One attains Nibbāna when one purifies the mind of ALL defilement. That is when one has
ultimate wisdom, or paññā. There is no way to equate compassion with paññā. One can be
compassionate to the maximum, but that does not mean one has gotten rid of ignorance. Those
beings in the Brahma worlds do not generate any hateful thoughts; they have perfected the four
Brahmavihara: metta, karuna, mudita, upekkha. They don’t have a trace of hateful thoughts.
Yet they have ignorance (of the Four Noble Truths), and thus will one day be reborn in the four
lower realm. Therefore, this is also a significant contradiction. See, “Sotāpanna Stage of
Nibbāna.”
iii. Buddha said life in the human realm is better than life any other (except for the ones reserved
for the Anāgāmīs). That is because the easiest to attain Nibbāna is from the human realm. Some
beings in higher realms can be helpful to us, and we should share merits with them. However, a
human is not supposed to worship any other being. One has to have faith only in the Buddha,
Dhamma, and Saṅgha. No other being can help with our goal of attaining Nibbāna.
iv. “Skill in Means” or whatever other term anyone comes up runs into the same problem as
compassion above in (ii). Such ideas run against the core teachings of the Buddha. Even if one
gets rid of greed and hate, but still has ignorance, then one will end up getting back greed and
hate DUE TO ignorance. One attains Nibbāna by cultivating wisdom.
v. Mahāyāna descriptions on all these philosophical concepts like emptiness or sunyāta are just a
lot of empty words. They have much simpler explanations that are consistent with original
teachings; see the links below. The Mahāyānists had to re-invent alternate descriptions for
these terms. The original meanings came to conflict with their “revisions” discussed in i-iv.
7. Those who follow the Mahāyāna version do that due to a couple of reasons. (1) They are born into
Mahāyāna tradition (just like I was born to Theravāda). (2) They have had no exposure to other
versions of Buddhism. The problems with Mahāyāna versions are not due to their making. But it is
time at least to start changing those features that are in stark contradiction not only with the original
teachings of the Buddha, but also with modern science.
§ The oath in most Mahāyāna traditions to, “not to seek Enlightenment until ALL BEINGS ARE
READY for Enlightenment” is the most visible contradiction. As I pointed out in #2 above, at
least these days, we know that this is an outright lie. That itself is an apparent break of the
precept not to lie knowingly.
§ There needs to be an open discussion about how to weed out the inconsistent material from all
sects, and to recover the pure Buddha Dhamma for the benefit of all.
Before discussing the problems with the wrong interpretations in Theravāda, let us discuss the
concept of sunyāta; see, “What is Sunyāta (Emptiness)?.” Mahāyāna Buddhism tries to make a big
deal out of sunyāta, because their forefathers (those who started Mahāyāna tradition) could not
understand the concept of Nibbāna. Mahāyāna teachings believe that Nibbāna is an abstract concept.
However, it is a simple concept; see, “Nibbāna – Is It Difficult to Understand?”
Also see: “Saddharma Pundarika Sutra (Lotus Sutra) – A Focused Analysis”....
1. This sutrā, was written by several Indian philosophers over hundreds of years, led to the gradual
formation of Mahāyāna Buddhism over that period. Note that I am NOT referring to it as a sutta.
Suttās are the original teachings of the Buddha delivered in Māghadhi language. They were
subsequently written down in Pāli, and are available in the Tipiṭaka.
§ In contrast, all Mahāyāna sutrās were written after the Parinibbāna (passing away) of the
Buddha. Furthermore, they all are in Sanskrit without an exception.
§ Thus at least we have a clear way of distinguishing the original discourses by the Buddha
(suttās) and those Mahāyāna sutrās written by laypeople hundreds of years after the Buddha.
§ Even in the Theravāda tradition, the question often arises regarding the interpretation of key
concepts. As mentioned in the Tipiṭaka, this problem was there even DURING the time of the
Buddha.
2. Once Mahā Prajapathi Gotami bhikkhuni, who was Prince Siddhartha’s stepmother approached the
Buddha and pointed out that some bhikkhus were providing incorrect interpretations of the Dhamma.
She fears that things will really get out of hand after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha. “How can the
future generations figure out the correct version of Dhamma?” she asked the Buddha.
§ The Buddha agreed that it is inevitable that wrong interpretations will always be there, but said
that there is a way to clarify identify the correct version. He always said to look for consistency
with the Four Noble Truths, as explained in the suttās. Cause and effect as defined in the
paṭicca samuppāda dhamma, and how to stay from getting indebted via rāga, dosa, moha as
laid out in the Vinaya. Actual teachings should lead to rāgakkhaya, dosakkhaya, and
mohakkhaya (getting rid of rāga, dosa, moha).
§ If a version of Dhamma does not lead to rāgakkhaya (reduction of greed), dosakkhaya
(reduction of hate), and mohakkhaya (reduction of ignorance), then that version should be
discarded. Internal consistency must be there too.
3. A bit of background material before we discuss this sutra: According to the Buddha, there are
three ways to attain Nibbāna:
§ A Sammā Sambuddha (like Buddha Gotama) discovers the Noble Eightfold Path and
axhieves Nibbāna through his efforts, AND he can teach the doctrine to others.
§ A second way to attain Nibbāna is to learn the Dhamma from a Sammā Sambuddha or a true
disciple of his. That is how an Arahant reaches Nibbāna.
§ Then there are pacceka Buddhas who discover the Path by themselves but are not capable of
explaining it to other people.
4. Now let us discuss how this sutra paved the way for the Bodhisattva concept in Mahāyāna.
This sutrā starts off by the Buddha saying that even though he had taught that there were three paths
to Nibbāna but now he is admitting that there is only one; when Ven. Ānanda asked why he says that
he did not think people were “ready” for this higher doctrine. Instead of there being three vehicles (or
paths) one can take, there is only one. It is the great vehicle or the Mahāyāna (“mahā” is great, and
“yāna” is a vehicle). And this is the path that he himself took by striving for eons as a Bodhisattva to
become a Buddha.
§ Continuing with this sutrā, now he (the Buddha) was advising everyone to become a
Bodhisattava and to attain the Buddhahood. Then he assures all those Arahants present there,
including Ven. Sariputta, that they themselves will become Buddhas. This is a complete lack of
understanding of the concept of an Arahant. An Arahant is not going to be reborn, and thus,
there is no way for an Arahant to become a Buddha.
Now let us go through a few more “obvious inconsistencies” in the sutrā.
5. It is astonishing to see that the sutrā opens with, “Thus have I heard…”, a big musāvāda (an
untruth) that Ven. Ānanda is providing the details of the sutrā.
First, a brief background is in order. Venerable Ānanda, who knew all the suttās by heart, recited
them at the First Buddhist Council. Thus any given sutta in the Tipiṭaka starts off with clarification,
“Thus have I heard…” to indicate that this was what Venerable Ānanda had heard himself. Trying to
give the impression that this sutrā was also one delivered by the Buddha, the authors of the Lotus
sutra attempted to deceive the readers.
§ The historians have generally accepted that the Lotus sutra was written much later after the
passing away (Parinibbāna) of the Buddha Gotama. That is true of all other sutras written in
Sanskrit
§ The oldest parts of the text (Chapters 1–9 and 17) were probably written down between 100
BCE and 100 CE, and most of the book had appeared by 200 CE; see, for example, WebLink:
WIKI: Lotus Sutra. Thus it was written by several authors over 100 years or more. A translation
was made from Sanskrit to Chinese in 255 CE, and this is the earliest historical documentation
of its existence.
6. The middle of the sutrā is devoted to describing the “universal accessibility” of the Buddhahood to
anyone. Here it reads like a fairytale with astounding stories of accomplishments. For example, a
daughter of the dragon king Sagara astonishes the assembly by performing various supernormal acts
and says she can attain the Buddhahood “in an instant”.
§ However, theos sutrā also stress the importance of faith and devotion as means to realization of
enlightenment. There is less emphasis on the neew for wisdom.
7. A critical problem is the Bodhisattva vow that a Mahāyāna Buddhist agrees in advance to take
(see, WebLink: WIKI: Bodhisattva vow). That is the promise to wait until “everyone is ready to
attain the Buddhahood”. It is not clear how or who can determine WHEN everyone is ready.
§ Current scientific facts point to the existence of an innumerable number of beings; see, “There
are as many creatures on your body as there are people on Earth!“. Therefore, it is a critical
question as to how all these beings can attain the Buddhahood at the same time
§ Furthermore, it seems contradictory that Buddha Gotama and many other previous Buddhas did
not wait for anyone else.
8. The story gets even more fascinating in Chapter 16 (presumably as a different writer of the sutrā
comes up with another idea). That is when the Buddha Gotama reveals that he is an eternal being. He
attained the Buddhahood an incalculably distant time in the past. Even though seems to pass away at
times to nirvana (Sanskrit word for Nibbāna), he periodically makes appearances in the world.
§ This declaration makes the Buddha more like a Creator God, who has been there at all times!
And there is no discussion on the issue of whether there was a beginning to this world.
§ It seems to me that the philosophers who wrote these Mahāyāna sutras had no idea of the
concept of Nibbāna! By the very definition, the whole concept of attaining Nibbāna is to
dissociate from this suffering-filled material world: There are several posts at this site ranging
from, “Three Kinds of Happiness – What is Nirāmisa Sukha?” to “What are Rūpa? – Relation
to Nibbāna” on the concept of Nibbāna.
§ Then there is the issue of there being other Buddhas present at that assembly too. And they all
seem to be “at the same level.” Thus the question arises as to who was the first Buddha, and
then why those other Buddhas “did not wait until everyone else was ready for the
Buddhahood.”
9. Most of the sections of the sutrā hyperbolize the value of the single, great vehicle (Mahāyāna) to
attain the Nibbāna. That is in contrast to the three vehicles of Sammā Sambuddha, Pacceka Buddha,
an Arahant; see #3 above. There is no discussion on the actual distinguishing doctrinal concepts
of the single vehicle, other than just saying that it has the advantage of “easy accessibility of the
Buddhahood”. What makes this “single-vehicle” approach different from the original “three-
vehicle” approach in terms of details in Dhamma? For example, does it have a new way of the
describing the Noble Eightfold Path, paṭicca samuppāda, or the Four Noble Truths?
§ The sutrā, like many other Sanskrit sutrās, only mentions those critical foundational concepts
of Buddha Dhamma in passing. There is no discussion on them, let alone pointing out the
differences from the original doctrine. I am amazed that no one even refers to this glaringly
obvious point. What sets the “single-vehicle” approach apart from the original “three-
vehicle” approach other than the name change?
§ But the real problem is that in changing some key concepts. For example, getting rid of the
Arahant concept and making the Buddha effectively a Creator God. This sutrā paved the way to
distort the Buddha Dhamma for generations to come.
§ In terms of the necessary conditions set forth by the Buddha, does this sutrā clarify how to
reduction in greed, hate, and ignorance? Can anyone point to such aspects? Other than the
usage of grandiose descriptions, there is nothing substantial in terms of doctrine, let alone a
revised doctrine. All it does is to gravely distort the foundational concepts like Nibbāna,
Buddhahood, and Arahanthood with the concept of “a single-vehicle”.
10. There are so many untruths, inconsistencies, and exaggerations in this sutrā that I have space in
this essay to point out only the gross problems that are vividly displayed. That is why the post is a
“focused analysis.”
§ Here is an English translation of the sutrā available online, so that anyone can peruse through
and see the apparent difference between this sutrā and any Pāli sutta that is in the Tipiṭaka:
WebLink: PURIFYMIND: Lotus Sutra
§ One could compare this sutrā with the actual Pāli suttas that I started discussing; see, “Sutta –
Introduction,” and the posts on the Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta below that.
§ I must emphasize that one needs to evaluate this sutrā in the context of the profound and self-
consistent Buddha Dhamma. One can get a glimpse of this by examining the “Key Dhamma
Concepts,” “Paticca Samuppada,” and “Abhidhamma” sections at this website, where I have
only begun to layout the teachings, especially in the Abhidhamma section.
11. I would be happy to respond (and to correct any legitimate errors in the analysis) if anyone can
point out any problems with my analysis. Please send me a comment to [email protected].
§ This analysis is consistent with the central theme of this website, which is to point out problems
with both Mahāyāna and Theravāda versions as being practiced today. It is for the benefit of
everyone that we should remove (or at least be aware of) all inconsistencies and untruths. Then
the current and future generations will have a version of Buddha Dhamma that is close to the
original version.
References
“Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma (The Lotus Sutrā)”, translated by Leon Hurvitz
(2009).
“The Lotus Sutrā”, translated by Burton Watson (1993).
“Saddharma Pundarika or The Lotus of the True Law”, translated by H. Kern (1884). First Dover
edition, 1963.
Revised (added #6) December 28, 2015; November 26, 2017; December 16, 2017
1. In Mahayana Buddhism, there are books written about Suñyāta (actually it is Suññāta in Pāli) or
emptiness. Mahayana Buddhism tries to make a big deal out of suñyāta, because their forefathers
(those who started Mahayana tradition) could not understand the concept of Nibbāna. It is
unfortunate that many people who are only introduced to Mahayana teachings (and are not aware of
the original teachings of the Buddha) believe that Nibbāna is an abstract concept.
§ However, Nibbāna is a very simple concept if one understands pure Buddha Dhamma; see,
“Nibbāna – Is it Difficult to Understand?“.
§ But it can be examined at deeper levels too: “Nibbāna “Exists”, but Not in This World“.
§ See more at “Nibbāna“.
2. What is emptiness?
§ When an entity A is devoid of entity B, then it can be said that entity A is devoid of B, or empty
of B. That is the emptiness or suñyāta.
§ For example, if we take a water bottle and pour the water out, we say we have an empty bottle.
But in reality there is air in the bottle, so the bottle is empty only with regard to water; it is not
empty regard to air.
§ Emptiness is relative. One has to say what it is empty of. There is no absolute “emptiness”. It is
meaningless to say “this is emptiness”, because there may be something there that we are not
aware of.
§ For example, up until recently scientists thought deep space is “empty”. But now they know
that it is full energy. Still, one could say that “deep space is empty of tangible matter” to a good
approximation.
3. The Buddha said when the mind becomes empty of greed (rāga), hate (dosa), and ignorance
(moha) it becomes empty of those defilements: “ragakkhayo Nibbanan, dosakkhayao Nibbanan,
mohakkhayo Nibbanan“, and that mind has attained Nibbāna. That is emptiness, suñyāta with respect
to defilements, and also with respect to anything material in this world of 31 realms; see below.
VERY SIMPLE explanation, even though it is not easy to get there.
§ When one attains the Arahant phala, one’s mind becomes sunya of rāga, dosa, moha. But one
still has saññā (perception), vedanā (feelings), etc. and lives like a normal human being until
death.
§ But his/her mind is devoid of greed, hate, and ignorance, so that h/she will not do any immoral
act, under any circumstances.
§ At the death of an Arahant, “this world of 31 realms” becomes devoid of any trace of that
lifestream, except for the Arahant‘s nama gotta (mano imprints or memory records, for
previous lives; see, “Difference Between Dhamma and Saṅkhāra (Sankata)“); there is no
rebirth. So that is another suñyāta.
4. There is a sutta in Tipiṭaka that is about sunnata (emptiness), and was delivered by the Buddha,
called the Cula-Suññāta sutta. I actually wrote the original post before I knew about this sutta. When
a friend of mine told me about the sutta, I was glad to see that the sutta described emptiness very
similar to the way I described it above. This does show that the Dhamma is internally self-consistent.
§ Please click the link below for its translation that I extracted from, WebLink:
ACCESSTOINSIGHT: Cula-suññata Sutta: The Lesser Discourse on Emptiness. Normally, I
come across many English translations that are bad and even erroneous, but fortunately this
translation is fairly good.
The highlighting in the link below is mine, and I have made some comments:
1. Degradation of Theravāda Buddha Dhamma occurred gradually over the past 1500 years, but two
drastic changes took place during that time: (i) Buddhaghosa’s introduction of Hindu meditation
techniques 1500 years ago, (ii) misinterpretation of anicca and anatta by the European scholars when
they translated both Tipiṭaka and Visuddhimagga to English in the late 1800’s.
§ In several posts following this post in this section, I will provide evidence for the above (see
bullet #7 below).
§ In this post I will discuss the historical timeline, which is critical to the discussion. I have
combined two previous posts, “Theravada: Problems with Current Interpretations of Key
Concepts” and “Historical Timelines of Buddha Dhamma and Sri Lanka – End of Sinhala
Commentaries” (and removed them) to come with this more concise post.
§ As I explained in earlier posts in this section, much worse distortions to Buddha Dhamma took
place with branching out of various sects based on Mahayana, Zen, and Tibetan (Vajrayana). It
started with the rise of Mahayana in India about 500 years after the Buddha. Here we are
focusing only on Theravāda Buddha Dhamma.
2. Here we look at the timeline of Theravāda Buddha Dhamma from the beginning, and see whether
we can discern when the pure Dhamma started going underground. There are a few historical facts
that most people agree on.
(BCE = Before Current Era, CE = Current Era = AD):
§ 563 – 483 BCE: Buddha Gotama
§ 377-307 BCE: The city of Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka, was established by King Pandukabhaya.
But there is evidence that human colonization in Sri Lanka goes back to at least 30,000 years;
see the detailed article on Sri Lanka on Wikipedia : WebLink: Wikipedia: History of Sri Lanka
§ 247 BCE: Buddha Dhamma was introduced to the Sinhala Kingdom in Anuradhapura, Sri
Lanka by Ven. Mahinda Thero.
§ 161-137 BCE: For the first time in history, King Dutugemunu united all of Sri Lanka under one
kingdom.
§ 29 BCE: Tipiṭaka (the version recited at the Third Buddhist Council —Dhamma Sangayana —
around 247 BCE), was written down in Sri Lanka at the Fourth Sangayana, which was the last
Sangayana attended by all Arahants. This is the Pāli Tipiṭaka that has survived to this date.
§ 100-200 CE: Ven. Maliyadeva, Last Arahant by some accounts, lived in Sri Lanka : WebLink:
Wikipedia: Maliyadeva (However, it is likely that there have been “jāti Sotāpannas” who
attained Arahanthood since then, but may not be that many).
§ 100 BCE: It is likely that Mahayana Buddhism actually originated when the earliest Mahāyāna
sūtras to include the very first versions of the Prajñāpāramitā series, along with texts
concerning Akṣobhya Buddha, which were probably written down in the 1st century BCE in the
south of India : WebLink: Wikipedia: Mahayana
§ 150-250 CE: Life of Nagarjuna; considered to be the founder of Mahayana Buddhism.
Nagarjuna’s central concept was the “emptiness” (shunyata) of all dhammas. Most influential
work is Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental verses on the middle way).
2. It is clear that the Pāli Tipiṭaka that we have today has the original teachings of the Buddha, since
it was written down by Arahants. However, Buddha Dhamma started to decline within 100-200 after
it was written down.
§ Still, there was no significant impact on Theravāda Buddhism up to the writing of
Visuddhimagga by Buddhaghosa around 450 CE.
§ The other major work that influenced Theravāda teachings to date was Abhidhammattha
Sangaha by Acariya Anuruddha, who was there around the same time as Acariya Buddhaghosa.
However, since not many people are knowledgeable in Abhidhamma, it has not impacted
Theravāda to the same extent as Visuddhimagga.
§ The last, and most important misinterpretation took place much later, in the late 1800’s when
early European scholars started translating the Tipiṭaka to English. That was when the key Pāli
terms anicca and anatta were incorrectly translated as impermanence and “no-self”.
3. In order to first discuss the influence of Buddhaghosa, let us look at the timeline of events that led
his visit to Sri Lanka roughly 950 years after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha. Here is a timeline
compiled by Bhikkhu Nyanamoli, taken from his introduction to Ref. 1 (see the references below).
King Devanampiyatissa (307-276 BCE):
§ Arrival of Ven. Mahinda in Anuradhapura and establishing Dhamma in the kingdom of King
Devanampiyatissa.
§ Mahavihara monastery founded by Ven. Mahinda.
King Vattagamini (104-88 BCE):
§ Abhayagiri monastery founded by the King and becomes separate from Mahavihara monastery.
§ Sensing insecurity, Mahavihara monastery writes down Tipiṭaka (away from the royal capital).
King Bhatikabhaya (20 BCE-9 CE):
§ Public disputes started to break out between Abhayagiri and Mahavihara monasteries.
King Vasabha (66-110 CE):
§ Sinhala commentaries on Tipiṭaka ended being recorded at any time after his reign.
King Voharika-Tissa (215-237 CE):
§ Dipavamsa composed.
§ Some of Buddhadatta Thera’s works.
King Mahanama (412-434 CE):
§ Buddhaghosa arrives in Sri Lanka and composes Visuddhimagga and other works.
4. I really recommend reading the Introduction to the English translation of Visuddhimagga by Ven.
Nyanamoli (Ref. 1). To quote Ven. Nyanamoli (starting on p. xxvii of Ref. 1):
“…Now by about the end of first century B.C. E. (dates are very vague), with Sanskrit Buddhist
literature just launching out upon its long era of magnificence, Sanskrit was on its way to become a
language of international culture. In Ceylon the Great monastery (Mahavihara), already committed by
tradition to orthodoxy based on Pāli, had been confirmed in that attitude by the schism of its rival,
which now began publicly to study the new ideas from India. ……In the first century C.E., Sanskrit
Buddhism (“Hinayana”, and perhaps by then Mahayana) was growing rapidly and spreading abroad.
The Abhayagiri monastery would naturally have been busy studying and advocating some of these
weighty developments while the Mahavihara has nothing new to offer. …….King Vasabha’s reign
(66-110 CE) seems to be the last mentioned in the Commentaries as we have them now, from which
it may lie dormant, nothing further being added. Perhaps the Mahavihara, now living only on its past,
was itself getting infected with heresies. ……in King Mahasena’s reign (277-304 CE) things came to
a head. With the persecution of Mahavihara with royal assent and the expulsion of its bhikkhus from
the capital, the Abhayagiri monastery enjoyed nine years of triumph. But the ancient institution
rallied its supporters in the Southern provinces and the king repented. The bhikkhus returned and the
king restored the buildings, which had been stripped to adorn the rival”.
“Still, the Mohavihara must have foreseen, after this affair, that unless it could successfully compete
with the “modern” Sanskrit in the field of international Buddhist culture by cultivating Pāli at home
and aboard it could assure its position at home. It was a revolutionary project, involving the
displacement of Sinhala by Pāli as the language for the study and discussion of Buddhist
teachings, and the founding of a school of Pāli literary composition. ………It is not known what
was the first original Pāli composition in this period; but the Dipavamsa (dealing with historical
evidence) belongs here (for it ends with Mahasena’s reign and is quoted in the Samantapasadika, and
quite possibly the Vimuttimagga (dealing with practice), was another early attempt by the
Mahavihara in this period (4th century) to reassert its supremacy through original Pāli literary
composition”.
5. Here is another account of the destruction of the original Mahavihara during the reign of King
Mahasena (277-304 CE) from Ref. 2 (p. 46): “..the Mahā-Vihara, the Brazen Palace, and all such
religious edifices, built by generosity of devout kings and pious noblemen for the use of the orthodox
Saṅgha, were razed to the ground. Some three hundred and sixty-four colleges and great temples
were uprooted and destroyed, says an ancient chronicle (Nikāya-Sangraha, p.14), ..”.
6. Thus it is clear that the historical tradition of compiling Sinhala commentaries (on Tipiṭaka)
was abandoned somewhere in the 4th century or even before that, and many of the original
Sinhala Atthakatha could have been burnt when the original Mahavihara was burned. A concerted
effort was initiated by the Mahavihara to compile literature in the Pāli language to counter the
onslaught by Sanskrit Mahayana literature in India that was benefiting the Abhayagiri monastery.
The appearance of Buddhaghosa on the scene in the early fifth century accelerated this effort to
compile Pāli literature.
§ More details can be found in the Mahavamsa, the Pāli historical account of the history of Sri
Lanka compiled in the 5th century (Ref. 3).
7. In the next two posts, “Buddhaghosa and Visuddhimagga – Historical Background” and
“Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“, I will discuss the events leading to
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1226 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
Buddhaghosa’s writing of Visuddhimagga, and how it introduced the first major contamination of
Buddha Dhamma by incorporating Hindu vedic meditations — breath mediation and kasina
mediation.
The second major contamination — which has been even more damaging — was the incorrect
translation of anicca and anatta as impermanence and “no-self”. This is discussed in the last two
posts: “Background on the Current Revival of Buddha Dhamma” and “Misinterpretation of Anicca
and Anatta by Early European Scholars“.
References
1. Acariya Buddhaghosa has had a strong influence on Theravāda Buddhism for the past 1500 years.
Before examining his commentaries — especially the Visuddhimagga (Path of Purification) — we
will discuss some significant events that took place prior to his time, and why he came to Sri Lanka to
compose those commentaries.
§ The historical timelines up to the arrival of Buddhaghosa in Sri Lanka is given in the previous
post in this section: “Incorrect Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
§ I have used material from the three references given below in putting together this post.
2. First, we note that only Arahants participated in the first four Buddhist Councils (Sangayana), and
the fourth one was held at the Aluvihara Monastery (a rock temple) near present-day Matale in the
Central Province of Sri Lanka in 29 BCE; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma“.
§ The Tipiṭaka was written down fully (as exists today) for the first time in this fourth
Sangayana in Pāli with Sinhala script (Pāli does not have its own alphabet).
§ So, it is important to keep three things in mind: (i) Genuine Dhamma existed in 29 BCE with
Arahants also completing the Abhidhamma Pitaka, (ii) What we have in the Tipiṭaka today is
this version and therefore we can have confidence that the true teachings of the Buddha are in
the Tipiṭaka, (iii) Tipiṭaka was written down in Pāli with Sinhala alphabet.
3. Secondly, many parts of the Tipiṭaka are in a condensed form as discussed in “Sutta –
Introduction“. Today, there is a tendency to translate Tipiṭaka suttas word-by-word, and this has
led to significant confusion and many contradictions as discussed in that post.
§ Starting at the time of the Buddha, commentaries were written to expand and explain the
key concepts that are in a condensed form that was designed for easy oral transmission.
We need to remember that the Tipiṭaka was not written down for around 500 years after the
Parinibbāna of the Buddha, and during that whole time it survived only because it was in a
form that was designed for ease of remembering; thus many details were omitted.
§ For example, Dhamma Cakka Pavattana sutta took many hours to deliver, but the sutta was
condensed to just a few pages of verse. It is not possible to condense all that information in a
sutta for mostly oral transmission that was available at the time. In those early days, Bhikkhus
explained the details when they delivered desanā or discourses to the public.
§ Therefore, in addition to the Tipiṭaka being orally transmitted through generations, the
details were also orally transmitted. However, when Buddha Dhamma started declining
around 100-200 CE, those details stopped being transmitted (there were not enough Ariyas, or
those who attained magga phala, to pass down correct explanations). Of course, the easy-to-
memorize verses of the Tipiṭaka were faithfully transmitted.
§ That last bullet explains a key problem that we have today. Even though the Tipiṭaka remains
intact, there have not been many Ariyas within the past hundreds of years to explain the key
concepts in the Tipiṭaka; but thanks to late Waharaka Thero, that has changed; see,
“Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
4. Even though a few commentaries were composed in the time of the Buddha in Pāli (we have three
in the Tipiṭaka; see below), most of them were written later on in Sinhala (especially after the time of
Ven. Mahinda), when written language became more common.
§ Up to the time of Buddhaghosa (after about 700 years from the time of Ven. Mahinda), there
would have accumulated a vast number of such commentaries called Sinhala Atthakathā which
means “accounts of the truth” (attha + kathā). However, it is likely that most of those were
destroyed when the Mahavihara was burned before Buddhaghosa’s arrival in Sri Lanka; see
below.
§ Buddhaghosa’s task was to translate those from Sinhala to Pāli, but instead he just made
a few of his own commentaries — especially the Visuddhimagga — where he incorporated
his own Vedic concepts in them; see below.
5. As given in the timeline in the post mentioned in #1, an important event took place before the
arrival of Buddhaghosa in Sri Lanka which led to the possible destruction of many original
commentaries; this was the establishment of the Abhayagiri Vihara in Anuradhapura around 100
BCE. This led to degrading of Buddha Dhamma in Sri Lanka, which then was accelerated by the
writing of the Visuddhismagga, as we discuss below.
§ Over a number of decades, Abhayagiri Vihara became a rival to the Mahavihara, which had
been the center of religious activity since Ven. Mahinda (King Devanampiyatissa).
§ The arrival of a body of monks from Pallarama in India, who belonged to the Vajjiputta Nikāya,
apparently started this schism between the two Vihara (p. 29, Ref. 3). This sect descended from
those who were expelled from the Theravāda by Ven. Moggaliputta Tissa Thero at the Third
Sangayana.
6. Later, during the reign of King Voharaka Tissa (215-237 CE), Abhayagiri Vihara adopted the
Vaitulya Pitaka. It is no coincidence that by this time Mahayana had become dominant in India.
§ When the Mahavihara raised objections to this new development, King Voharaka Tissa
appointed minister Kapila to investigate, and on his recommendation ordered all Vaitulya books
be burnt.
§ A key point to remember is that, “Literary activity in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) declined and, it
seems, fell into virtual abeyance between 150 CE and 350 CE, as will appear below” (Ref. 1, p.
xxiii).
7. During King Gothabhaya’s reign (254-267 CE), the Vaitulyan heresy raised its head again, and the
King again took action. He not only burnt their books, but branded 60 of their leaders and expelled
them.
§ Those expelled settled down at Kavira in South India. While they were there, a new recruit by
the name of Sangamitta joined them.
§ One day, while bathing, Sangamitta saw the branding on the backs of the others and learned
what had happened in Sri Lanka. He vowed to take revenge.
8. Sangamitta went to Sri Lanka, and was able to win the confidence of King Gothabhaya, who
appointed Sangamitta to be the tutor of his two sons.
§ When King Gothabhaya died, his elder son Jettha Tissa became King, but he was not that much
attached to Sangamitta, so Sangamitta went back to India. When Jettha Tissa died 14 years
later, the younger brother, Mahasena, became King.
9. Mahasena was very much attached to Sangamitta, and Sangamitta decided to come back to Sri
Lanka, realizing that his time to take revenge had come.
§ On Sangamitta’s advice, King Mahasena started a process that was very damaging to the
Mahavihara and to the Buddha Dhamma in Sri Lanka in general. He prohibited providing alms
to Mahavihara, and over time bhikkhus at Mahavihara migrated to other parts of the country.
§ By this time, Buddhism in Sri Lanka was in decline due to other factors too, one being the rise
of Mahayana in India. Arahants were scarce in the Island, and if there were some they would
have been in remote regions.
10. For 9 years, Sangamitta lived in glory, plundering the properties of Mahavihara, and eventually
burning down the seven story building with its libraries (p. 47 of Ref. 3). People became angry with
what happened to Mahavihara, and a rebellion was started by a minister of the King named
Meghavaranabhaya.
§However, before a battle took place, the minister was able to meet the King and explain why he
needed to make amends to the Mahavihara to appease the populace. The King apologized and
rebuilt the Mahavihara.
§ However, people were quite angry at Sangamitta, and he was killed on the orders of a queen of
the King, probably without the knowledge of the King.
11. The damage had been done. It is also said that when the King rebuilt the Mahavihara, it was
mostly those who were at the Abhayagiri who took residence at the restored Mahavihara. Therefore,
when Buddhaghosa visited the Mahavihara, the bhikkhus there could have been those originally
belonging to the Abhayagiri sect.
§ Furthermore, It is possible that many of the original Sinhala Atthakathā were destroyed when
the Mahavihara was burned to the ground. Even though copies of the Tipiṭaka were at many
different locations scattered throughout the country, it is not known how many of the
Atthakathā had copies.
§ In any case, none of those original Sinhala commentaries is in existence today.
§ Mahayana was taking root in India and possibly contributed to the degrading of Theravāda in
Sri Lanka as well. Sanskrit became the “language of the pundits” (with many new Sanskrit
sutra written by Nagarjuna, Vasudeava, etc), and Pāli was losing the battle; see, “Incorrect
Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
12. By the time of Buddhaghosa arrived in Sri Lanka (during the reign of King Mahanama between
412-434 CE), it is possible that some of those Atthakathā were still there.
§ Ven. Nyanamoli says (p. xviii of Ref. 1), “..There are references in these works (by
Buddhaghosa) to “Ancients (Porana) or “Former Teachers (Pubbacariya)” as well as to a
number of Sinhalese Commentaries additional to the three referred to in the quotation given
earlier. The fact is plain enough that a complete body of commentary had been built up during
the nine centuries or so that separate Bhandantacariya Buddhaghosa from the Buddha..” and
“..This body of material — one may guess that its volume was enormous — Bhandantacariya
Buddhaghosa set himself to edit and render into Pāli (the Tipiṭaka itself had been left in the
original Pāli)..”
§ By the way, “Porāna” is a Sinhala word (now Purāna), meaning ancient.
§ Apparently, the detailed explanations in those Atthakathā were held in high esteem among the
remaining Buddhists in India, and as we see below, this is where Buddhaghosa came to the
picture.
§ So, it appears that even though some of the Sinhala Atthakathā were burned with the
destruction of the Mahavihara, some had survived in other locations and brought back to the
rebuilt Mahavihara.
13. Buddhaghosa was born into a vedic brahmin family who lived close to the Bodhi Tree in India.
He mastered the three Vedas and was a well-known vedic scholar. He was converted to Buddhism by
a Bhikkhu Revata who lived in that region in India.
§ Law (p. 6 of Ref. 2) writes that Ven. Revata told Buddhaghosa, “..The Sinhalese Atthakatha
are genuine. They were composed in the Sinhala language by the inspired and profoundly wise
Mahinda, who had previously consulted the discourse of the Buddha, authenticated at the three
convocations (Sangayana), and the dissertations and arguments of Sariputto and others, and
they are extant among the Sinhalese. Repairing thither, and studying the same, translate (them)
according to the rules of the grammar of the Maghadhas (Pāli). It will be an act conducive to
the welfare of the whole world”. Malalasekara (p.66 of Ref 3) gives a very similar account of
that request.
§ Ven. Nyanamoli also gives a detailed account of how Ven. Revata recruited Buddhaghosa for
the project on pp. xxxiv-xxv (Introduction) of Ref. 1. Also see, pp. 31-39 of Ref. 2 and pp. 64-
69 of Ref. 3.
14. The important position assigned in the Theravāda tradition to the work of Buddhaghosa is evident
from the following quote from Ref. 1 (p. xli):
§ “..The doctrines (Dhamma) of the Theravāda Pāli tradition can be conveniently traced in three
main layers. (1) The first of these contains the main books of the Pāli Sutta Pitaka. (2) The
Abhidhamma Pitaka, notably the closely related books, the Dhammasangayani, Vibhanga
Paṭṭhāna. (3). The system which the author of the Visuddhimagga completed, or found
completed, and which he set himself to edit and translate back into Pāli ..”.
§ Even today, many Theravadins just use the Visuddhimagga and don’t bother to consult the
Tipiṭaka.
15. Sinhala tradition assigns the arrival of Buddhaghosa in Sri Lanka 965 years after the Parinibbāna
of the Buddha, according to Malalasekara (p. 66). This is consistent with the above timeline.
§ Upon arriving at the Mahavihara in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka, Buddhaghosa requested those
Atthakathā from the authorities. They were reluctant first, but after verifying that he was indeed
a scholar, they gave him access to the books (Refs. 1-3).
§ Law (p. 8 of Ref 2) says, “..Taking up his residence in the secluded Ganthakaro viharo at
Anuradhapura, he translated, according to the rules of the Maghdhas, which is the root of all
languages, the whole of the Sinhalese Atthakathā (into Pāli)”.
16. This assertion that Buddhaghosa “translated Sinhalese Atthakathā into Pali” is obviously not
correct.
§ It is clear that he incorporated many of his vedic concepts (breath meditation, kasina
meditation, etc) and made his own commentaries, as I will discuss in the next post.
§ Furthermore, in the next post, I will point out obvious inconsistencies of the Visuddhimagga
with the Tipiṭaka and with the remaining three original Pāli commentaries that are still in the
Tipiṭaka.
17. Law makes the following interesting statement (p. 38 of Ref. 2): “..Buddhaghosa’s task of
translating was finished in three months. Having observed the Pavarana, he informed the chief of the
congregation of the completion of his task. The Samgharaja praised him much and set fire to all
the works written by Mahinda in Sinhalese..”. We can make two observations:
§ If indeed the work was completed in three months as Law says, Buddhaghosa obviously did not
have even time to go through the whole of the Sinhalese Atthakathā, even if only a part of it
was left.
§ It is hard to believe that the chief Bhikkhu set fire to the original books. However, it is true that
ALL those Sinhalese Atthakathā were lost after the time of the Buddhaghosa.
18. In the next post in this section, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“, I will
discuss the key reasons why Visuddhimagga does not represent Buddha Dhamma.
§ However, as we discussed above, all of the Sinhala Atthakathā were lost soon after the
publication of Visuddhimagga, and Visuddhimagga became the sole source for explaining
Tipiṭaka material.
§ In fact, it became customary to just use the Visuddhimagga and not even consult the Tipiṭaka
until recent times, especially until the “discovery of Buddhism” by the Europeans who started
translating the Tipiṭaka as well as Buddhaghosa’s works; see detail in the “Historical
Background” section.
19. Furthermore, When Europeans started translating the Tipiṭaka (starting with Rhys Davis
and others), they translated suttas word-by-word to English, a practice that continues today.
§ However, It is not a good idea to translate Pāli suttas word-by-word, and those early
commentaries were critically important in order to expand on the Tipiṭaka material. This is
discussed in “Sutta – Introduction“.
§ In addition, those early European scholars made a huge mistake by incorrectly translating the
Pāli words anicca and anatta as impermanent and “not-self”; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca
and Anatta by Early European Scholars“.
§ This is why the work of late Waharaka Thero is so important. He was able to “re-discover” the
meanings of the key Pāli words by perusing through the remaining three original Pāli
commentaries of Patisambhidamagga, Petakopadesa, and Nettippakarana; see, “Preservation
of the Dhamma“.
References
1. In the previous post in this series, “Buddhaghosa and Visuddhimagga – Historical Background“,
we discussed the reason for Buddhaghosa to travel to Sri Lanka. Here is a brief summary of that post:
§ Many parts of the Tipiṭaka are in condensed form. Starting from the time of the Buddha,
commentaries were written to expand and explain the key concepts in the Tipiṭaka.
§ Most of those commentaries — at least from the time of Ven. Mahinda — were written in
Sinhala language by Ven. Mahinda himself and many Sinhalese Arahants for over 950 years up
to the time of Buddhaghosa. These were called Sinhala Atthakatha (true accounts).
§ A certain bhikkhu by the name of Ven. Revata in India recruited Bhuddhaghosa to travel to Sri
Lanka and translate those Sinhala Atthakatha to Pāli (This is detailed in Refs. 2-4 below as
well).
§ In this post, I will point out that instead of translating those Sinhala Atthakatha, Buddhaghosa
incorporated his own vedic ideas into his commentaries in Pāli, especially describing
Ānāpānasati as breath mediation.
2. Those Sinhalese Atthakatha disappeared from existence not long after Buddhghosa completed his
work (it is likely that most of them were burnt with the Mahavihara well before Buddhaghosa’s
time). Regardless of what happened to those original Atthakatha, Theravāda tradition accepted
Visuddhimagga to represent those original Atthakatha as well as the Tipiṭaka, and to date
Visuddhimagga is regarded in high esteem.
§ When he edited those Sinhala Atthakatha and composed the Visuddhimagga, Buddhaghosa —
who was a scholar in Vedic literature — incorporated Hindu Vedic concepts to the
Visuddhimagga.
§ In particular, he replaced real Buddhist Ānāpāna bhāvanā with breath meditation and also
introduced Hindu kasina meditation.
§ Buddhaghosa also disregarded the importance of the Tilakkhaṇa (anicca, dukkha, anatta), but I
will show evidence that he never distorted the meanings of them. That happened only when the
Europeans translated the both the Tipiṭaka and the Visuddhimagga to English; see,
“Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early European Scholars“.
§ He also reportedly wrote other commentaries on Tipiṭaka, but they are not widely used.
§ My guess is that Buddhaghosa did not consult the Sinhala Atthakatha even for the
Visuddhimagga. Certainly, Visuddhimagga is not compatible with the remaining original three
commentaries, as well as the Tipiṭaka, regarding meditation techniques.
3. As I discussed in the post, “Buddhaghosa and Visuddhimagga – Historical Background“, pure
Dhamma existed at least up to the fourth Buddhsit Council (Sangayana) held in 29 BCE in Matale,
Sri Lanka.
§ By the time Buddhaghosa arrived in Sri Lanka roughly 450 years later, drastic changes had
taken place (with the Buddhist center of Anuradhapura Mahā Vihara burnt down once and a
Mahayanist sect dominated the landscape for a while; see the above post) among other things.
§ So, the degradation of Theravāda Buddha Dhamma occurred gradually over two
thousand years, but two drastic changes took place during that time: (i) Buddhaghosa’s
introduction of Hindu meditation techniques in the fifth century, (ii) misinterpretation of
anicca and anatta by the European scholars when they translated both Tipiṭaka and
Visuddhimagga to English in the late 1800’s.
§ Even though there was a resurgence of Buddha Dhamma since late 1800’s due to the efforts of
those Europeans like Rhys Davids, Eugene Burnouf, and Thomas Huxley, unfortunately it was
this “distorted Dhamma” that spread throughout the world in the past 200 years.
4. Even though those old Sinhala commentaries were lost, three commentaries composed in Pāli
(Patisambhidamagga, Petakopadesa, and Nettippakarana) at the time of the Buddha remained intact
with the Tipiṭaka; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma“.
§ After Buddhaghosa composed Visuddhimagga, Theravadins almost exclusively used
Visuddhimagga instead of the Tipiṭaka, and those original Pāli commentaries were totally
neglected.
§ With help of those three original Pāli commentaries, Waharaka Thero was able to “re-discover”
the original teachings of the Buddha over the past 25 years or so. Unfortunately, Wahraka
Thero attained Parinibbāna recently; see, “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
§ After the “re-discovery” of the true teachings of the Buddha by Waharaka Thero over the past
25 years or so, it became clear that several key misinterpretations crept into Buddha Dhamma
over the past two thousand years. But the actual timeline of contamination was not clear.
§ For example, it was not clear whether Buddhaghosa himself was responsible for the
misinterpretations of anicca and anatta. In this post, I will show that Buddhaghosa was not
responsible for that part. In the post, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early
European Scholars”, I presented evidence that it was done by the Europeans pioneers when
they assumed that the Pāli words anicca and anatta were derived from anitya and anathma in
Sanskrit.
5. First, I will show evidence that Buddhaghosa did not distort the meanings of the words anicca and
anatta, even though he did not realize the importance of the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ We need to remember that what Buddhaghosa was supposed to do was to take material
from Sinhala Atthakatha and to compose his own commentary, Visuddhimagga, in Pāli.
One can purchase that original Pāli version, Ref. 1 below, from Amazon.
§ When comparing the Pāli and English texts below, I will be using the English translation of
Ref. 2.
6. On p. 271 of the Pāli Visuddhimagga (Ref. 1), for example, it says, “Catutthacatukke pana
aniccanupassi ettha tava aniccama veditabbam. Aniccata veditabba. Aniccanupassana veditabba.
Aniccanupassi veditabbo“.
§ This is translated in the book by Bhikkhu Nyanamoli (p. 282, vol. I) as, “But in the fourth
tetrad, as to contemplating impermanence, here firstly, the impermanent should be understood,
and impermanence, and the contemplation of impermanence, and one contemplating
impermanence“.
§ So, in this case Buddhaghosa used the correct Pāli words anicca, but Bhikkhu Nyanamoli
incorrectly translated it as “impermanence” following the misinterpretation by the European
pioneers before him, as we discussed above.
7. Buddhaghosa’s original Pāli version also states the relations among the three characteristics, as I
discussed in the post, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“. On p. 617 of Ref. 1,
“Yadaniccam tam dukkha’nti (SN 3.15) vacanato pana tadeva khandhapancakam dukkham. Kasma?
Abhinhapatipilana, abhinnapatipilanakaro dukkhalakkhanam.” AND
“Yam dukkham tadanatta’ti (SN 3.15) pana vacanato tadeva khandhapancakam anatta. Kasma?
Avasavattanato, avasavattanakaro anattalakkhanam“.
§ Which, combined to yield, ““if something is anicca, dukkha arises, therefore anatta”, as I
explained in my post too.
8. However, Bhikkhu Nynamoli, following the incorrect interpretation by the early European
pioneers in the 1800’s, translates those two verses as (p.663 of Ref.2): “Those same five aggregates
are painful because of the words, ‘What is impermanent is painful‘ (S. iii,22). Why? Because of
continuous oppression. The mode of being continuously oppressed is the characteristic of pain.”,
AND
“Those same five aggregates are not-self because of the words, ‘What is painful is not-self‘ (S.
iii,22). Why? Because there is no exercising of power over them. The mode of insusceptibility to the
exercise of power is the characteristic of not-self.”
9. Thus, it is very clear that it was not the Buddhaghosa who interpreted anicca as impermanent and
anatta as not-self, but those early Europeans in the late 1800’s. As explained in those previous posts,
subsequent scholars from Sri Lanka and other Asian countries propagated those two incorrect
interpretations.
§ For example, those early Sinhala scholars like Malalasekara, Jayathilaka, and Kalupahana,
learned Buddhism (and received Doctoral degrees on Buddhism!) from those European
pioneers at universities in United Kingdom.
§ One needs to contemplate on how the authority of those early Europeans on Buddha Dhamma.
They were merely translating the Tipiṭaka word-by-word (using perceived etymologies to
Sanskrit), as explained in those other posts.
§ We must realize that translating Tipiṭaka is not the same as translating any other book from one
language to another. One has to have a deep background in Buddha Dhamma to do that.
§ The key mistake made by Rhys Davids, Bernouf, and others, was to assume that Pāli
anicca and anatta are the same as Sanskrit anitya (which does mean impermanence) and
anathma (which does mean no-self).
10. Now we turn to the issue of Biddhaghosa introducing Hindu Vedic meditation techniques to
Buddha Dhamma in his Visuddhimagga.
Here is a key passage from Buddhaghosa’s original Pāli Visuddhimagga (p. 254 of Ref. 1): “Tattha
dighama va assasantoti digham va assasam pavattayanto. Assasoti bahi nikkhamanavato. Passasoti
anto pavisanavatoti vinayatthakathayam vuttam. Suttantatthakathasu pana uppatipatiya agatam.
Tattha sabbesampi gabbhaseyyakanam matukucchito nikkhamanakale pathamam abbhantaravato
bahi nikkhamati. Paccha bahiravato sukhumarajam gehetva abbhaantaram pavisanto talum ahacca
nibbayati. Evam tava assapassasa veditabba“.
Bhikkhu Nyanamoli correctly translates this passage to English as follows (p. 265 of Ref. 2): “Herein,
breathing in long (assasanto) is producing a long in-breath. ‘assasa is the wind issuing out; passasa
is the wind entering in’ is said in the Vinaya Commentary. But in the Suttanta Commentaries it is
given in the opposite sense. Herein, when any infant comes out from the mother’s womb, first the
wind from within goes out and subsequently the wind from without enters in with fine dust, strikes
the palate and is extinguished [with the infant’s sneezing]. This, firstly, is how assasa and passasa
should be understood”.
§ So, above is concrete evidence that Buddhaghosa himself referred to Ānāpānasati as breath
meditation. He specifically talked about the inhaling and exhaling air.
§ However, actual Buddhist Ānāpāna bhāvanā is not breath meditation; see, “7. What is
Änapāna?“.
11. The second problem that Buddhaghosa introduced in his Visuddhimagga was to present mundane
kasina meditation as a viable path to Nibbāna. He gives detailed explanations on how to make kasina
objects in the chapters 4 and 5 in Ref. 1.
§ For example, he goes to minute details in describing how to make an “earth kasina” starting on.
118 of Ref. 1: “..Nilapitalohitaodatsambhedavasena hi cattaro pathavikasinadosa. Tasma
niladivannam mattikam aggahetva gangavahe mattikasadisaya arunavananaya mattikaya
kasinam katabbam..”.
§ Bhikkhu Nyanamoli translates (p. 123 of Ref. 2): “..Now the four fruits of the earth kasina are
due to the intrusion of blue, yellow, red, or white. So instead of using clay of such colours, he
should make the kasina of clay like that in the stream of Ganga, which is the colour of the
dawn..”.
§ In the same way, Buddhaghosa goes to great details to describe how to make other types of
kasina objects.
12. The critical point is that true Buddhist kasina meditation does not involve any physical kasina
objects. If anyone can find a reference in the Tipiṭaka where it is described how to make a physical
kasina object, I would appreciate receiving that reference.
§ The true Buddhist kasina meditation was described by the Buddha to Ven. Rahula in the Mahā
Rahulovada Sutta (Majjhima Nikāya, MN 62). It was explained to him as a part of Ānāpānasati
bhāvanā, which can be done in many ways, but here by contemplating on internal body parts
made of satara mahā bhūta and realizing that external objects are also made with the same
satara mahā bhūta. Furthermore, that means there is nothing to be considered in one’s body as.
“me, myself, etc”.
“..Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho āyasmā rāhulo bhagavantaṃ etadavoca: “kathaṃ bhāvitā nu kho, bhante,
ānāpānassati, kathaṃ bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti mahānisaṃsā”ti? “Yaṃ kiñci, rāhula, ajjhattaṃ
paccattaṃ kakkhaḷaṃ kharigataṃ upādinnaṃ, seyyathidaṃ—kesā lomā nakhā dantā taco maṃsaṃ
nhāru aṭṭhi aṭṭhimiñjaṃ vakkaṃ hadayaṃ yakanaṃ kilomakaṃ pihakaṃ papphāsaṃ antaṃ
antaguṇaṃ udariyaṃ karīsaṃ, yaṃ vā panaññampi kiñci ajjhattaṃ paccattaṃ kakkhaḷaṃ kharigataṃ
upādinnaṃ— ayaṃ vuccati, rāhula, ajjhattikā pathavīdhātu. Ya ceva kho pana ajjhattikā
pathavīdhātu yā ca bāhirā pathavīdhātu, pathavīdhāturevesā. Taṃ ‘netaṃ mama, nesohamasmi, na
meso attā’ti—evametaṃ yathābhūtaṃ sammappaññāya daṭṭhabbaṃ. Evametaṃ yathābhūtaṃ
sammappaññāya disvā pathavīdhātuyā nibbindati, pathavīdhātuyā cittaṃ virājeti.”.
§ The other three, āpo, tejo, vāyo are discussed in the same way there. One does not need to make
kasina objects for true Buddhist kasina meditation, and as I said there is nowhere in the
Tipiṭaka that discusses preparing kasina objects.
13. In the next post, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early European Scholars“, we will
wrap up this section on “Historical Background“. With that post, I would have summarized the
historical background starting from the time of the Buddha to the present day. This is probably the
only section that can be said to be “finished”, even though I may edit the posts in this section as
needed.
References
1. It is ironical that the current revival of Buddha Dhamma is also due to the same reason that led to
the decline in Buddha Dhamma in most Buddhist countries for hundreds of years in the latter part of
the second millenium, i.e., the colonization of Asia by the Western powers starting with the
Portuguese and ending with the British.
§ The civil servants of the British East India Company came across ancient Buddhist literature in
various Asian countries and some of them realized the importance of these documents; some
started deciphering the documents themselves (e.g. Thomas W. Rhys Davids, 1843-1922) and
to do so, even learned Pāli and Sanskrit languages.
§ Others sent documents to Europe where mostly French and English philosophers (e.g., Eugene
Burnouf, 1801-1852) studied them and translated them to French and English. A thorough
account of the efforts by the British civil servants in India, Sri Lanka, and other Asian countries
in uncovering the “lost knowledge” and also in the restoration of historical Buddhist sites in
India has been given by Charles Allen in his excellent book, “The Search for the
Buddha” (2003).
2. These Westerners realized that there was something profound in this ancient doctrine which
exposed them for the first time to a religion that was not based on a Creator.
§ Thomas Huxley captured the essence this new religion brilliantly as follows (Thomas H.
Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays, 1894, pp. 68-69): “A system which knows of
no God in the Western sense; which denies a soul to man; which counts the belief in
immortality a blunder and the hope of it a sin; which refuses any efficacy to prayer and
sacrifice; which bids men look to nothing but their own efforts for salvation; which, in its
original purity, knew nothing of vows and obedience, abhorred intolerance, and never sought
the aid of the secular arm; yet spread over a considerable moiety of the Old World with
marvelous rapidity, and is still, with whatever base admixture of foreign superstitions, the
dominant creed of a large fraction of mankind”.
§ It is amazing that even at that early stage, when there must have been some confusion about the
mythical aspects of especially the Tibetan and Zen Buddhist practices, Huxley was able to
express the essence of Buddha Dhamma.
3. Based on their interest in the documents from Asia on Buddhism and Hinduism, Madame Helena
Petrovna Blavatsky and Colonel Henry Steel Olcott founded the Theosophical Society in New York
City in 1875. They subsequently traveled to India and Sri Lanka, and became Buddhists.
§ Olcott published “A Buddhist Catechism” in 1881. This book together with the “Light of Asia”
by Edwin Arnold in 1871 (which went through 100 printings), led to much interest in Europe
and America about Buddhism. Colonel Olcott opened several Buddhism-oriented schools in Sri
Lanka in order to revive the religion. I was fortunate to be able to attend one of those schools.
§ These efforts were subsequently augmented by a number of Sri Lankan intellectuals such as
Anagarika Dharmapala, G. P. Malasekara, K. N. Jayatilleke, Narada Thera, Walpola Rahula
Thera, David Kalupahana, and also by several more Westerners who were impressed by the
Buddhist teachings to a point that they came to Sri Lanka, became monks, and wrote many
excellent treatises on Theravāda Buddhism; these include Nyanatiloka Thera, Nyanyaponika
Thera, and Bhikkhu Bodhi.
4. Even though those early publications by Rhys Davids, Arnold, and Olcott in the late 1800’s were
mainly on the Theravāda Buddhism, beginning in the early part of the 1900’s, Zen Buddhism became
an object of fascination in the West and continues to be a significant presence in the West.
§ In contrast to the earlier introduction of (Theravāda) Buddhism to the West by Westerners, Zen
made its way into the Western consciousness via the efforts of an elite group of Japanese
intellectuals – most notably D. T. Suzuki. Suzuki, who came to America in 1897, wrote several
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Historical Background 1237
books including “An Introduction to Zen Buddhism”; this book emphasized the transcendent
and mystical nature of Zen.
5. Here is an excerpt from the above book by Suzuki, which clearly states the belief of the Mahayana
thinkers that the original teachings of the Buddha are “primitive” and Mahayana provided the needed
improvements (p. 1, footnote 1):
§ “..to be accurate, the fundamental ideas of the Mahayana expounded in the Prajnaparamita
group of Buddhist literature, the earliest of which must have it appeared at the latest within 300
years off the Buddha’s death. The germs are no doubt in the writings belonging to the so-called
primitive Buddhism. Only their development, that is, a conscious grasp of them as most
essential in the teachings of the founder, could not be effected without his followers’ actually
living the teachings for some time through the variously changing conditions of life. Thus
enriched in experience and matured in reflection, the Indian Buddhists came to have the
Mahayana form of Buddhism as distinguished from its primitive or original form. In India
two Mahayana schools are known the Madhyamika, of Nagarjuna and the Vijnaptimatra or
Yogacara of Asanga and Vasubandhu. In China more schools developed: the Tendai, the
Kegon, the Jodo, the Zen, etc. In Japan we have besides these the Hokke, the Shingon, the Shin,
the Ji, etc. All of these schools or sects belong to the Mahayana wing of Buddhism”.
(Highlighting is mine).
6. This is in sharp contrast with the basic presumption in Buddha Dhamma that only a Buddha can
discover the laws of nature and those teachings CANNOT be improved upon:
§ There is only ONE set of natural laws and those were discovered by the Buddha. As one goes
through the content in this website, I hope one would be able to see that statement is justified.
Also see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction“
7. More recently, Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayana) has gained prominence in the West. This is no doubt
the result of the publicity of the Chinese invasion of Tibet in 1953 and the incredible personal
charisma of the Dalai Lama.
§ It is unfortunate that the Dalai Lama has to state that, “My confidence in venturing into science
lies in my basic belief that as in science so in Buddhism, understanding the nature of reality is
pursued by means of critical investigation: if scientific analysis were conclusively to
demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of
science and abandon those claims.” (highlighting mine) – cited from “The Universe in a
Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality” (2005).
8. Both the Mahayana and Vajrayana sects are now realizing that some concepts in those forms of
“Buddhism” have to change with the new findings of science. The fundamental teachings of the
Buddha as stated in the Theravāda Dhamma, in contrast, remain unchallenged because no such
“improvements” were incorporated to “keep up with the times and cultures”.
§ The Pāli Tipiṭaka has remained the same since it was written down 2000 years ago. The reality
is that science is only now beginning to confirm many things that the Buddha stated 2500 years
ago; see, “Dhamma and Science – Introduction” and the subsequent links.
§ Regrettably, the translated and edited versions of the Tipiṭaka, especially those by Acariya
Buddhaghosa, have many misinterpretations.
9. Beginning at the end of the twentieth century, there is a renewed interest in “Buddhism” in the
West, based on several books by Western scientists.
§ It seems to have started with the publication of “The Tao of Physics” by physicist Fritjof Capra
(1975). In the book he describes how, one day quietly sitting by the ocean, he realized that there
may be a connection between the subtleties of quantum mechanics and Eastern “mysticism”, in
which he included “Hinduism, Buddhism, Chinese Thought, Taoism, and Zen”. It appears that
he was trying to make a connection between the world of matter described by quantum
mechanics and the “mind” that is predominant in “Eastern mysticism”. Even by the time of the
5th edition (2010), he had not realized that Zen was a branch of Buddhism, and had not been
exposed to any Theravāda literature. However, the connection he was trying to establish
apparently made an impact on the Western audience and this trend will hopefully continue and
be directed in the right direction.
§ There are others who have contributed to the recent interest in “Buddhism” in the West: The
Art of Happiness” and other books by Dalai Lama, “The Embodies Mind” by Francisco Varela
et al., “Confession of a Buddhist Atheist” and other books by Stephen Batchelor, are some
examples.
§ However, most these books have incorrect interpretations of Buddha Dhamma because they are
heavily influenced by Mahayana Buddhism, which has totally veered away from the original
teachings of the Buddha, as I have discussed in this section.
10. The books that I mentioned at the beginning of the essay and several other books by Ven. Ledi
Sayadaw, Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi, Ven. Walpola Rahula, and others (see the References below), are
providing the much needed material on Theravāda Buddhism to the Western audience, even though
they themselves use some incorrect interpretations due to two main “contamination problems”.
§ One happened 1500 years ago, when Buddhaghosa distorted Ānāpāna bhāvanā as “breath
mediation” and also introduced Hindu kasina mediation to Buddha Dhamma in his
commentary, Visuddhimagga.
§ The other problem of misinterpreting anicca and anatta as impermanence and “no-self” was
done by those early European scholars who translated Tipiṭaka to English; see, “Why is Correct
Interpretation of Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta so Important?“. These incorrect interpretations were
adopted by the whole world since the late 1800’s.
§ Therefore, all Buddhist literature published in all languages since the late 1800’s have
both these problems. This is a critical point, see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta
by Early European Scholars“.
§ We need to resort to the Pāli Tipiṭaka that still contains the original teachings of the Buddha,
and it is the goal of this website to systematically present those original teachings of the
Buddha.
References
April 30, 2017;revised next day (#12); revised August 14, 2018
1. April 29, 2017: I have removed the previous post entitled, “Answers to Criticism of Pure Dhamma
Interpretations” and have re-written this post to replace it.
§ Degradation of Theravāda Buddha Dhamma occurred gradually over the past 1500 years,
but two drastic changes took place during that time: (i) Buddhaghosa’s introduction of
Hindu meditation techniques 1500 years ago, (ii) misinterpretation of anicca and anatta
by the European scholars when they translated both Tipiṭaka and Visuddhimagga to
English in the late 1800’s.
2. In order to understand the current situation, one really needs to have an understanding of the
historical background in this section, “Historical Background”, but at least the posts starting with,
“Incorrect Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline“.
§ As I explained in earlier posts in this section, much worse distortions to Buddha Dhamma took
place with branching out of various sects based on Mahayana, Zen, and Tibetan (Vajrayana). It
started with the rise of Mahayana in India about 500 years after the Buddha.
§ Degradation of Theravāda Buddha Dhamma occurred gradually over the past 1500 years, but
two drastic changes took place during that time: (i) Buddhaghosa’s introduction of Hindu
meditation techniques 1500 years ago, (ii) misinterpretation of anicca and anatta by the
European scholars when they translated both Tipiṭaka and Visuddhimagga to English in the late
1800’s.
3. To setup the background for the present discussion on (ii) above, we also need to know at least the
following facts (they are discussed in detail in posts in this section).
§ Pāli is a “phonetic language” (sounds give the meanings in most cases, especially for key the
words). It comes from Magadhi (Maga Adhi or Noble Path) language that the Buddha spoke.
§ It has no grammar like most other languages, even though people have tried to “force Pāli
grammar” over the past two hundreds of years.
§ Furthermore, Pāli does not have its own alphabet. When the Tipiṭaka was written down 2000
years ago, it was written in Pāli with Sinhala script.
§ For example, we can write any word in another language with the English alphabet: The Pāli
word “අත්ත” that is written with Sinhala script can be written in English as atta, attha, or
aththa. Phonetically, “aththa” is more correct, but we see it written mostly as “atta” or “attha”.
To make it short, probably “atta” is better. We will go with the latter, and thus write as atta and
anatta, for example.
4. Some people believe “atta” and “attha” have two different meanings. But I have not seen any clear
examples given to show that they have different meanings. From the above discussion it is clear why
they mean the same.
§ This is where we need to pay attention to the issue of how to refer to the Tipiṭaka. Someone
may be writing that word as “atta” in one sutta and another person writing another sutta may
write it as “attha“.
§ So, many people at the forum quote different passages from different suttas trying to prove that
they have different meanings. This practice of just quoting from suttas and (mostly incorrect)
commentaries is making the discussions incomprehensible.
§ Of course “atta” can have different meanings depending on where the word is used; see, “Attā
Hi Attano Nātho“.
5. The root problem of writing a given Pāli word (that was originally written with Sinhala script 2000
years ago) in English must have been a critical issue to address for those English, German, and
French scholars who took on the daunting task of translating the Tipiṭaka in the late 1800’s.
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
Historical Background 1241
§ Now there are two separate key issues: First is to just write the Pāli text in English, like
writing “අත්ත” as atta, attha, or aththa, for example. We discussed this issue in #3 and #4
above.
§ The second issue is even more important: Actual translation of the Pāli word to English. In this
particular case of the word “අත්ත”, they translated it as “self”. That translation is incorrect, and
now let us see why those early translators like Rhys Davids, Eugene Burnouf, and Edward
Muller chose that meaning.
6. Those Europeans first came across Sanskrit vedic texts in India. They found the Pāli texts in
Sri Lanka, Burma, and other countries later on. This is very important.
§ By the time of the arrival of English, Buddhism in India had totally vanished. There were no
Pāli texts in India except those inscribed on the “WebLink: Wikipedia: Pillars of Ashoka“, the
stone columns made by Emperor Ashoka about 300 years after the Parinibbāna of the Buddha.
§ So, when they tried to interpret those inscriptions, they were very much confused, because that
language (Pāli) was not in existence in India. Furthermore, there were Sanskrit texts which
were written well before the Buddha’s time.
§ This is an important point that I will address in future posts. Pāli was never a widely-used
language in India. It appeared in India for a relatively brief time while Buddhism flourished for
a few centuries encompassing Emperor Ashoka’s reign.
7. Going back to our main discussion, Tipiṭaka was not even TRANSLATED to Sinhala language
until 2005; see #12 below. It had remained in Pāli language (written with Sinhala script) since first
written down in 29 BCE (2000 years ago).
§ Before written down 2000 years ago, the Tipiṭaka was transmitted generation to generation
orally for over 500 years. That is why it composed in a special way to make it easier to recite
and remember.
§ That is another reason why we should not get hangup on whether “atta” is different from “atto”
or “bhava” is different from “bhavo“. They convey the same meaning. For example, “upādāna
paccayā bhavo” (which rhymes better) appears in some places instead of “upādāna paccayā
bhava”. Both give the same meaning.
§ Furthermore, Sinhala commentaries (called Sinhala Atthakatha) were composed to expand and
explain the key concepts in the Tipiṭaka. But all those were lost and we only have
commentaries written after about 500 CE (including Visuddgimagga) and they have many
errors; see, “Buddhaghosa and Visuddhimagga – Historical Background“.
8. In order to get an idea of how those European pioneers struggled with first interpreting the
inscriptions on Ashoka pillars and later translating the Tipiṭaka itself, I highly recommend the book
“The Search of the Buddha” by Charles Allen (2003). His family had been in India for generations
serving in the British governments and he was born in India.
§ The book has a lot of information and also pictures of many historical sites in India before they
were restored; even though not shown in that book, historical sites in Sri Lanka and other
Buddhist countries were in similar bad shape. It is truly fascinating to read about the efforts of
those who dedicated their lives to the effort of uncovering Buddha Dhamma.
§ All those Asian countries (Sri Lanka, India, Burma, Thailand, etc) were in decline and
Buddhism itself was in a much worse shape than today. Those European scholars are really
responsible for the current revival of Buddhism.
9. However, the only bad outcome was that they mistranslated most of the key concepts of Buddha
Dhamma. We cannot really blame them. They were doing their best and there were no bhikkhus (even
in Sri Lanka) who were knowledgeable at that time.
§ At least in the beginning, those pioneers thought Sanskrit and Pāli were very much related.
They are related, but not in a useful way. Sanskrit adapted many Pāli terms, but made them
“sound sophisticated”. But the true meanings were not as apparent.
§ For example, pabhassara in Pāli Pāli became prabhasvara in Sanskrit. While the meaning of
pabhassara can be discerned from its Pāli roots (see, “Pabhassara Citta, Radiant Mind, and
Bhavaṅga“), as far as I know that is not true for the Sanskrit word prabhasvara.
§ Another example is paṭicca samuppāda (see, “Paṭicca Samuppāda –
“Pati+ichcha”+”Sama+uppāda“), which was adapted to Sanskrit as, “Pratittyasamutpada”,
which sounds more sophisticated, but does not convey anything useful.
10. The most significant damage was done with the translation of the two Pāli words of “anicca”
and “anatta” when those pioneers took those two words to be the same as the two Sanskrit
words “anitya” and “anathma“ .
§ Sanskrit word “anitya” does mean “impermanent”, but that is not what is meant by the Pāli
word “anicca“. Similarly, Sanskrit word “anathma” does mean “no-self” but “anatta” means
something totally different; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
§ This itself has been responsible for preventing millions of people attaining Nibbāna for the
past 200 years.
11. Let me show just two verses that obviously do not make any sense if “anatta” is interpreted as
“no self”:
§ Many people translate, “Sabbe dhammā anattā” as “all things are not self”. How can dhamma
have a self in any case? For example, it is necessary say that “Buddha Dhamma has no self?”.
§ Another example from the WebLink: Suttacentral: Anatta Sutta: “..Rūpaṃ, bhikkhave, anattā,
vedanā anattā, saññā anattā, saṅkhārā anattā, viññāṇaṃ anattā“.
§ If we translate that verse with “anatta” as “not self”, it says, “bhikkhus, no self in matter, no
self in feelings, no self in perceptions, no self in volitional thoughts, no self in consciousness..”.
§ How can an inert rūpa or vedanā, saññā, saṅkhāra can be “self” anyway? Those are
nonsensical statements IF we translate “anatta” to be “no self”.
12. The Buddha had foreseen this and warned not to TRANSLATE the Tipiṭaka to ANY
LANGUAGE, and particularly to Sanskrit. There were two Brahmins by the names of Yamela and
Kekuta who were experts on the Vedic Texts; they became bhikkhus and asked the Buddha whether
they should translate the Pāli suttas to Sanskrit.
§ That is when the Buddha admonished them that Sanskrit was a language with musical
overtones developed by the high-minded Brahmins and thus it was not possible to convey the
true meanings of Maghadhi (Pāli) words in Sanskrit; see, WebLink: tipitaka: Chulavagga 5.33.
§ In the SuttaCentral English translation, the Pāli word for Sanskrit (chandasa) [chandaso:
Conversant with the Vedas, a brahmin] is translated incorrectly as, “metrical”; see, “WebLink:
suttacentral: 15. Minor matters (Khuddaka)” (at [Now at that time Yameḷu and Tekula were the
names of two monks who were brothers]) which is the translation of “WebLink: suttacentral: 1.
Khuddakavatthu“. The relevant Pāli text is located close to the end, and starts as, “Tena kho
pana samayena yameḷakekuṭā nāma…”.
§ Thanks to a “devoted reader” who sent me those two references!
13. So, the Tipiṭaka was not translated to even Sinhala for 2000 years in Sri Lanka. Instead,
commentaries were written in Sinhala to expand and explain the Tipiṭaka. Unfortunately, ALL those
were lost except for three commentaries in Pāli included in the Tipiṭaka; see, “Buddhaghosa and
Visuddhimagga – Historical Background“.
§ However, the Tipiṭaka was translated to Sanskrit (despite the admonition by the Buddha not to
do that), and it is likely that those translations were in even Sri Lanka within the Abhayagiri
sector.
14. Recently I participated In two online forums briefly, and one of the criticisms published at the
Dhamma Wheel and the SuttaCentral discussion groups was that I was not using “..international
standards used by indologists for over a century”.
§ I hope now one can understand why those standards established starting in the late 1800’s have
actually distorted Buddha Dhamma (not intentionally of course).
§ It does not matter whether one writes gati or gathi, hethu-phala or hetu-phala, micchā diṭṭhi or
miccha diṭṭhi, satipaṭṭhāna or satipatthāna. In fact, I just Googled micchā diṭṭhi and miccha
diṭṭhi; both get hits, because different people just spell them differently; see #3 and #4 above.
§ There are a few Pāli words that give different meanings based on how they are writte and
pronounced, and I will write about them in the future.
15. I cannot emphasize enough that Pāli is unlike any other modern language. Meanings come from
how one pronounces words. One cannot use etymology with the way one spell out (in English).
Again to emphasize:
§ Pāli does not its own alphabet. Tipiṭaka was written in Pāli with Sinhala script.
§ Pāli does not have grammar rules, even though those European pioneers tried to invent
grammar for Pāli, compose Pāli-English dictionaries, etc.
§ Sanskrit words should never be used to interpret Pāli words.
§ While a Pāli-English dictionary could be useful in some cases, there are cases where they give
wrong interpretations (anicca, anatta, pabha, etc); see, “Pāli Dictionaries – Are They
Reliable?“.
16. Another criticism was that my interpretation of saṃsāra as “san” +”sāra” must be incorrect
because saṃsāra is defined in the verse, “khandhanan ca patipati, dhatu-ayatanana ca,
abbhocchinnam vattamana, samsaro’ ti pavuccati ti“, or “the process of the aggregates, elements and
bases, proceeding without interruption is called saṃsāra“.
§ There are many ways to describe a given concept and all of them can be inter-consistent.
Samsāra can also be stated as a “non-stop rebirth process that has no beginning” in addition to
the above two descriptions.
§ In another example, “sabba” or “all” in this world can be stated as, “pañcakkhandha” or ten
āyatana, or 18 dhatu, etc. There is no fixed definition.
§ By the way, the pronunciation of “san” +”sāra” can be either “saṃsāra” or “saṃsāra“; I prefer
the latter, because it shows how it can be derived from “san“.
§ Furthermore, Buddha Dhamma has many words with “san” and they are all consistent.
Furthermore, by knowing what “san” is, one can easily figure out the meaning of those “san”
words; see, “San“.
17. In the Dhammapada verse,
“Aneka jāti sansāram
sandā vissan anibbisan
gahakaram gavesan to
dukkhā jāti punappunam”
§ There are four places in the above where “san” comes in. This and another gātha were the
expressions of intense joy felt by the Buddha at the moment of attainment of Buddhahood. I
will write post on this in the future.
§ The word “san” appears very frequently in the Tipiṭaka, but it is often masked by the fact that
in many places it rhymes as “sam“, as in “saṃsāra“, “sampadeta“, “sammā“; see, “What is
“San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
18. In order to complete the historical background relevant to this discussion, I need to point out a
couple of more points.
§ Following the original translations by Rhys Davis, Eugene Burnouf, and others, contemporary
Sinhala scholars like Malalasekara (who was a doctoral student of Rhys Davis), “learned”
Buddhism from the Europeans, and thus started using wrong interpretations.
§ Other Sinhala scholars like Kalupahana and Jayathilake also learned “Buddhism” at universities
in the United Kingdom (received Doctoral degrees on Buddhism), and wrote books in both
English and Sinhala.
§ Of course, scholars in other Buddhist countries did the same in their languages and the incorrect
interpretations spread through the whole world.
§ So, I hope I have provided enough information to at least contemplate on why the opinions of
“scholars” are likely to be wrong, due to reasons beyond their control. Again, I admire and
appreciate what Rhys Davids, Burnouf, Muller, and others did those days, and it was not their
intention to distort Buddha Dhamma. It is not the fault of current scholars either.
19. It is also important to note that mass printing was not available until recent years, and became
common only in the 1800’s; see, “WebLink: Printing press“.
§ In the early days, Tipiṭaka was written on specially prepared leaves, and needed to be re-written
by hand every 100-200 years before they degraded. So, we must be grateful to the bhikkhus in
Sri Lanka who did this dutifully over almost 2000 years.
§ Thus mass production of books became possible only with the new rotary printing presses that
came out in the middle of 1800’s. By the time those key concepts had been mistranslated,
printing had become widespread.
§ WebLink: Wikipedia: The Pāli Text Society was founded in 1881 by Rhys Davids, and started
printing those translations. So, it was just unfortunate that it was those “distorted English
translations” that spread throughout the world.
§ Luckily, we still have the original Pāli Tipiṭaka and three original commentaries.
§ With help of those three original Pāli commentaries, Waharaka Thero was able to “re-discover”
the original teachings of the Buddha over the past 25 years or so. Unfortunately, Wahraka
Thero attained Parinibbāna recently; see, “Parinibbāna of Waharaka Thero“.
20. August 14, 2018: I just realized that the discussion in #19 above has another important
implication, due to a comment at the following discussion forum on the “WebLink:
dhammawheel.com: The teachings of Ven. Waharaka Abhayaratanalankara Thero“. You may want
to read the posts there especially from about July 25, 2018 (top of page 16 of that discussion forum).
§ It is reasonable to question how a team of European scholars were able to change
interpretations of key words like anicca. In a few words, this can be attributed to the revolution
in printing that essentially overlapped this period of the “uncovering of Buddhism” by the
European scholars.
21. European invasions of Sri Lanka (and essentially all Asian countries) started around the year
1505, and the British took complete control of Sri Lanka in 1815 : “WebLink: wiki: History of Sri
Lanka“. British civil servants started their historical works on Buddhism in Asian countries
(especially India and Sri Lanka) around 1850.
§ The printing press became widely available only after the rotary press was invented in 1843:
“WebLink: Printing press“. As pointed out above, Rhys Davids started publishing the English
translations of the Tipiṭaka in 1881.
§ Up to that time, the printed version of the Pāli Tipiṭaka was on specially prepared ola (palm)
leaves; see, “Preservation of the Dhamma“. This was a laborious process as detailed in that
post. Fortunately, bhikkhus kept re-writing the Tipiṭaka material in every hundred years or so,
when the “old version” started degrading. There are no surviving Sinhala texts on palm leaves.
Of course, there were no bhikkhus in India to maintain their copies of the Pāli Tipiṭaka; only the
Asoka pillars survived.
§ The key point is that the old Sinhala commentaries had been destroyed long ago, and only the
Pāli Tipiṭaka was maintained for hundreds of years when Rhys Davids started publishing the
English translations of the Tipiṭaka in 1881.
§ This is why there is no record of the correct interpretations of key words like anicca and anatta
in Sinhala. It is safe to assume that the same holds in other Asian countries. The invention of
the printing press was a key issue.
Also see, “Tipiṭaka Commentaries – Helpful or Misleading?“.
December 6, 2017
4. There is no need to consult any commentary other than the three original ones mentioned
above. In fact, I have explained at length why the other key commentaries used today provide
inaccurate and inconsistent explanations; see, “Historical Background“.
The above mentioned essay (in #1) is a good example of some misconceptions on the importance and
validity of Tipiṭaka commentaries. When I say “commentaries” from now on below, they do not
include the original three commentaries included with the Tipiṭaka.
§ In the following, the statements within quotation marks and highlighted in red are from the
above essay, and are accompanied by my comments pointing out the flaws in those statements.
5. “The Tipiṭaka (Pāli canon) assumed its final form at the Third Buddhist Council (ca. 250 BCE) and
was first committed to writing sometime in the 1st c. BCE. Shortly thereafter Buddhist scholar-monks
in Sri Lanka and southern India began to amass a body of secondary literature: commentaries on the
Tipiṭaka itself..”.
§ Not true. The original three commentaries mentioned in #3 above (Patisambhidamagga,
Petakopadesa, and Nettippakarana) were compiled during the time of the Buddha, and those
still are in the Tipiṭaka itself:
§ Those three original commentaries are in Pāli, but there were many others written in Sinhala
language, and all of those have been lost, as discussed below.
6. “Most of these texts were written in Sinhala, the language of Sri Lanka, but because Pāli — not
Sinhala — was the lingua franca of Theravāda, few Buddhist scholars outside Sri Lanka could study
them. It wasn’t until the 5th c. CE, when the Indian monk Buddhaghosa began the laborious task of
collating the ancient Sinhala commentaries and translating them into Pāli, that these books first
became accessible to non-Sinhala speakers around the Buddhist world”.
§ This statement refers to those early Sinhala commentaries that have since been lost.
§ It is correct that Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga — as well as other commentaries such as
Vimuttimagga — were written in Pāli by Indian scholars.
§ It is also important to note that incorrect translations of those Pāli words led to more problems
when those were translated to English; see #7 below.
7. “These commentaries (Atthakatha) offer meticulously detailed explanations and analyses —
phrase-by-phrase and word-by-word — of the corresponding passages in the Tipiṭaka“.
§ First of all, Atthakatha (a Sinhala word meaning “true accounts”) were the ancient
commentaries on Tipiṭaka written in Sinhala. They ALL have been lost; see, “Preservation of
the Dhamma“.
§ So, it is misleading to refer to those as the commentaries in question. In contrast, the
commentaries in circulation today are NOT those ancient Atthakatha, but more recent ones like
Visuddhimagga.
§ Buddhaghosa’s mission was to translate the material in Sinhala Atthakatha to Pāli so that those
bhikkhus in India could read them. Unfortunately, he incorporated many Vedic concepts;
see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis“.
§ What I am saying is to examine the evidence presented in those posts. If one agrees, then one
can just remove Visuddhimagga as a reliable source. That itself will solve half the
problem.
§ The second problem is the incorrect translation of key Pali words in those commentaries
as well as in Tipiṭaka suttas; see, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early European
Scholars“.
§ As I have presented evidence throughout this website, the Tipiṭaka and the three original
commentaries are enough to guide us.
9. “First, the chronicles and commentaries provide a vital thread of temporal continuity that links us,
via the persons and historical events of the intervening centuries, to the Tipitaka’s world of ancient
India. A Tipiṭaka without this accompanying historical thread would forever be an isolated
anachronism to us, its message lost in clouds of myth and fable, its pages left to gather dust in
museum display cases alongside ancient Egyptian mummies..”.
§ There are no myths or fables in the Tipiṭaka. I would challenge anyone to show any evidence
from the Tipiṭaka. This is an irresponsible and egregious statement.
10. “Second, almost everything we know today about the early years of Buddhism comes to us from
these post-canonical books.”.
§ There is nothing in these commentaries that provide any significant information about the time
of the Buddha. They may provide information about the time at which they were written. For
example, Visuddhimagga was written about 800 years after the Buddha.
11. “One might reasonably wonder: how can a collection of texts written a thousand years after the
Buddha’s death possibly represent his teachings reliably? How can we be sure they aren’t simply
derivative works, colored by a host of irrelevant cultural accretions? First of all, although many of
these texts were indeed first written in Pāli a thousand years after the Buddha, most Sinhala versions
upon which they were based were written much earlier, having themselves been passed down via an
ancient and reliable oral tradition..”.
§ This is the point I am making. We do know that, for example, Buddhaghosa distorted Buddhist
meditation techniques, Ānāpāna meditation was misinterpreted as breath meditation and Hindu
kasina meditations were also incorporated,
§ For details, see, “Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga – A Focused Analysis” and “Is Ānāpānasati
Breath Meditation?“.
12. “But what of the credentials of the commentators themselves: can their words be trusted? In
addition to living a monastic life immersed in Dhamma, the compilers of the commentaries possessed
unimpeachable literary credentials: intimate acquaintance with the Tipiṭaka, mastery of the Pāli and
Sinhala languages, and expert skill in the art of careful scholarship. We have no reason to doubt
either their abilities or the sincerity of their intentions”.
§ This is also a critical issue. As I discussed in those posts mentioned above, Buddhaghosa was a
Vedic Brahmin and he distorted Ānāpāna to breath meditation and incorporated kasina
meditations into Visuddhimagga; no such kasina meditations are to be found anywhere in the
Tipiṭaka.
§ Like so many late commentators, Buddhaghosa was just another philosopher like Nagarjuna.
By the way, Nagarjuna was also a commentator, and his work led to the rising of Mahāyāna
version of Buddhism.
§ I have discussed the drawbacks in Mahāyāna; see, for example, “Key Problems with Mahāyāna
Teachings” and “Saddharma Pundarika Sutra (Lotus Sutra) – A Focused Analysis“.
§ Same kind of arguments can be applied to Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayāna) and Chinese Zen
Buddhism; all these are off-shoots of the original teachings in the Tipiṭaka; see, “Historical
Background“. In fact, it is well-worth the time to read this section before coming to any
conclusions.
13. “And what of their first-hand understanding of Dhamma: if the commentators were scholars first
and foremost, would they have had sufficient meditative experience to write with authority on the
subject of meditation? This is more problematic”.
§ This is the only statement that I agree with. They were just “scholars” and philosophers, who
had not made any progress in actual practice.
§ This is true today as well. Many “scholars” have written books on Buddha Dhamma without
having any significant progress in following the Noble Path. In fact, many are not even
nominally Buddhists; some are “secular Buddhists” who do not believe in rebirth or Nibbāna;
see, “Buddhism without Rebirth and Nibbāna?“.
§ I am not trying to put them down. They do serve a meritorious purpose in teaching how to live
a moral life. However, those books/journal papers/websites cannot be used to clarify deeper
teachings in the Tipiṭaka.
14. A key point missing in the current discussion is that it is not possible to comprehend the key
concepts like anicca and anatta without at least attaining the Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna.
However, these days, people tend to gauge the qualifications by checking only whether a given
person is an “academic scholar”.
§ Just like only a practicing physician can truly understand and diagnose a patient, not one who
has just studied medical text books.
§ Only an Ariya (a Noble person) — who has practiced the true teachings and at least attained the
Sotāpanna stage of Nibbāna — can comprehend deep concepts like anicca, anatta, viññāṇa,
and saññā. One cannot fully understand such deep concepts by just studying or reading
about them. For example, see, “What is Saññā (Perception)?“.
15. The most referred to commentaries (these days) are Buddhaghosa’s WebLink: wiki:
Visuddhimagga and Upatissa’s WebLink: wiki: Vimuttimagga (to a much less extent). The original
Pāli text for the latter was long believed to have been lost; for centuries, discussions about the text
therefore relied on a 5th c. Chinese edition.
§ As we have established, those later commentaries — including Visuddhimagga and
Vimuttimagga — were written in Pāli.
16. Therefore, those late commentaries lead to confusion in two ways:
§ One is the erroneous interpretations by the commentators themselves, as discussed above.
§ The other is incorrect translations — initially done by early European scholars — in translating
key Pāli terms incorrectly; see, for example, “Misinterpretation of Anicca and Anatta by Early
European Scholars“. This has made the situation even worse.
These are two critical points to consider by those who are tempted to refer to those late
commentaries. I cannot emphasize the importance of those two points enough.
17. Then there are those who quote from Chinese Āgama. Even though those original Chinese
documents COULD BE authentic, my point is that they were also derived from the Tipiṭaka and thus
serve no purpose as additional resources.
§ They could be valuable for those who are proficient in Chinese but cannot read Pāli, Sinhala, or
English.
18. Finally, to re-emphasize my main point: The Tipiṭaka — together with the three original
commentaries included in it — are sufficient to clarify the original teachings of the Buddha. The goal
of this website is to have such a consistent clarification of Buddha’s teachings in English at one
place.
§ Using just the Tipiṭaka, I have also pointed out some current misinterpretations in Theravāda
Buddhism, mainly due to the influence of Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga; see, “Incorrect
Theravāda Interpretations – Historical Timeline” and posts referred there.
§ There still could be some minor inconsistencies at the website, and I am appreciative of those
readers who have pointed out some of them that have led to improvements. But I have high
confidence in the correctness of key concepts.
§ Please do not hesitate to comment on any inconsistency with the Tipiṭaka or within the website.
However, for the reasons that I have detailed, please do not quote from any other sources.
References
1. This section on Chanting may be helpful in cultivating saddhā (faith). For those who believe that
there is no value in these “ritual-like” procedures, it may be a good idea to read the post, “Panca
Indriya and Panca Bala- Five Faculties and Five Powers“.
§ If done with understanding, these are not rituals as in “silabbata paramasa”.
§ Therefore, as I keep adding items to this section, I will try to provide the deep meanings behind
these “seemingly ritualistic” chantings.
§ In addition to the aspect on the deeper meanings, there are subtle benefits in listening to
chantings, especially those by Ariyas or Noble Persons. This is why I decided to add the sound
recordings by the Venerable Thero.
2. The Buddha said that the mind takes precedence over everything else. Our speech and bodily
actions are controlled by our thoughts. And these thoughts get their moral power from wisdom
(paññā) and the joyful state (pīti or “preethi“) of the mind.
§ One can make a given meritorious deed much more powerful by doing it with joy and
understanding. The most potent kusala citta is done with “joy and understanding” (a
somanassa-sahagata, ñāṇa-sampayutta citta); see, “Javana of a Citta – Root of Mental Power”.
§ Recent scientific studies are beginning to illustrate the power of the focused mind; see, for
example, “The Biology of Belief” by Bruce H. Lipton (2008) and “Biocentrism” by Robert
Lanza (2009).
§ Thus chanting done with understanding can have benefits, especially for those who have a
dominant “saddhā indriya“, or have a high-degree of faith in the Buddha or Buddha Dhamma.
3. However, one should not force anything on the mind. If chanting is not something that appeals
to someone, then it should not be forced. Different people start off with different tendencies (i.e., they
have a dominant faculty or power, see, “Panca Indriya and Panca Bala- Five Faculties and Five
Powers“). Out of sati, saddhā, viriya, samādhi, and paññā, the dominant one should be the focus. As
one cultivates the Path, other four will also grow.
§ This is also related to the concept of how one’s character (gathi) and habits change as one
follows the Path. Then one’s tendencies, associations, etc will also gradually change; see, “The
Law of Attraction – Habits, Character (Gathi), and Cravings (Āsavas)“.
§ Thus one may want to concentrate just on the topics on the site that are appealing to oneself.
Once in a while, one can take a look at other sections and see whether their opinions on those
sections have changed or not.
§ The main thing is to stay on the path of least resistance and the topics that can be easily
comprehended.
Next, “Namaskaraya – Homage to the Buddha“, ……
3. Both interpretations are important. For someone starting out, without much knowledge of
Dhamma (but still sees the value in Dhamma) and thus wishes to pay respects to the Buddha, the
conventional meaning itself is the dominant.
§ But the Buddha himself said that the best way to pay homage to him is to learn Dhamma and to
follow the Path. That is the more deeper meaning of the Namaskāraya. But they also have the
reverence for the Buddha himself. As the knowledge in Dhamma grows, the second
interpretation becomes clear, while not losing the first.
4. Here is a recital of the Namaskāraya by a Venerable Thero (volume adjustment on the right). It is
normally recited three times:
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Namaskāraya
You can download the file below by clicking “DOWNLOAD”. You can play it there or right-click on
the screen and choose “save as..” to save to your computer.
Download
More audio files are at: “Sutta Chanting (with Pali Text)“.
Namaskāraya – What Does it Really Mean?
may not serve the purpose of bringing “joy to the heart” or “citta pasāda” (pronounced “citta
pasāda“); for a deeper discussion on citta pasāda, see, “Javana of a Citta – The Root of Mental
Power“.
§ Thus for those who are new to the deeper meanings in Dhamma, the conventional
interpretations may be a good start. As knowledge in Dhamma grows, the second interpretation
becomes clear without losing the first, i.e., reverence to the person himself can also only grow
as one learns how valuable his Dhamma is.
2. What we have here is a short phrase that can be correctly translated in a short essay. Let us see
what is really meant by this verse.
§ “Namo” means incline as in accepting something with this reverence because of its value;
“tassa” means “to this” or “because of this”. This is why we bend our heads to signify this.
§ “bhaga” is to separate and “vata” is the usually translated as body, but it has more
wider meaning to anything in this world. The Buddha, in trying to show that uselessness of
clinging to one’s body, advised to separate the body into 32 parts and see that there is nothing
substantial in any of the parts. Even though we highly value our bodies, it will decay with old
age, and will eventually give us only sicknesses and ailments. And it will last only about 100
years.
§ In the wider sense, anything in this world can be divided into parts and be shown that there is
nothing substantial in them.
§ Once we see that it is unfruitful to cling our bodies (and anythings in general), we lose the
craving (“raha” in Pāli or Sinhala) and become “arahant”(from “a” + “raha”). The word
Arahant also comes from this meaning, i.e., someone who has given up craving for worldly
things, by comprehending the true nature.
§ As we saw in the post, “What is “San?” – the Meaning of Saṃsāra”, “san” means accumulating
worldly things. “ma” means become free of doing that. Thus “sammā” (san+ma) means “stop
accumulating worldly stuff that will only cause suffering in the end”.
§ The accumulation of worldly things lead to preparation of future births or
“bhava”.Sambuddhassa (san+bhu+uddassa) means “remove from the root the causes for
preparing bhava via accumulating san”, i.e., become free of the rebirth process or to work
towards Nibbāna.
3. Now we can see the whole verse:
“By analyzing my body and other worldly things with wisdom, I have come to understand the
unfruitfulness of clinging to such things, and I incline to rout out the rebirth process (i.e., existence in
the 31 realms) and attain Nibbāna”.
§ Here incline means one keeps “bent on attaining that goal”. With deeper understanding of
Dhamma one’s resolve will be strengthened. As with most things in Buddha Dhamma, it is
always about one’s mind.
§ The resolve has to come through understanding. There is no one watching, and no one else
monitoring the progress; it is one’s own mind that is doing all that.
4. Finally, the word namaskāraya (nama+as+kāraya, where “nama” is one’s name, “as” pronounced
like “us” means remove, and “kāraya” means doing) conveys the idea that one is making a resolve to
get rid of the attachment one has for one’s worldly things. It is a condensed version of the verse.
§ Of course the conventional meaning of “namaskāraya” is “paying homage”.
2. There are altogether 24 supreme qualities of the Tiratana or Three Jewels: Buddha, Dhamma,
Saṅgha. These are called “suvisi guna,” where suvisi means 24 and guna are the qualities. There are
two main ways to interpret and utilize these 24 qualities.
§ Chanting of these qualities can provide a calming effect for the mind and is normally done
before a formal meditation session; see, “Tisarana Vandana and Its Effects on One’s Gathi.”
§ Meaning of the word “vandanā” is “va” + “andha” + “nā”, where “va” is for “vaya” or destroy,
“andha” is for blind, and “nā” is for “nyāya” or the procedure for getting rid of moral blindness
and attaining Nibbāna. The path to attaining Nibbāna is encoded in the Tiratana vandanā. We
will discuss this in detail in a future post.
§ Also, this chanting is alternatively called Tiratana vandanā (where Tiratana means the Three
Jewels) OR Tisarana vandanā (where Tisarana means “guidance from the Three Jewels”). It is
imperative to recite them correctly.
WebLink: Listen to the verses of Tiratana Vandana
§ The recital should break at places where there is a comma to state each quality separately, and
should not break in the middle (e.g., no breaks in Anuttarro purisadamma sārathi); see below.
3. These qualities can only be stated partially, and can never be fully grasped. If a person with a
mathematics Ph.D. teaches addition/subtraction to a first-grade student, that student cannot fully
appreciate the capabilities or qualifications of the teacher. When the same student grows up and
learns higher mathematics later from the same teacher at a university, he can appreciate the
capabilities of the teacher more.
§ In the same way, the qualities of the Three Jewels can be appreciated only with more learning
of Dhamma. In fact, when I first wrote the original post on this subject more than a year ago,
my understanding was much less than now. In the meantime, I have understood more and also
experienced the power of the recital of these qualities.
Supreme Qualities of the Buddha (Budu Guna)
Itipi so Bhagavā, Arahan, Sammāsambuddho, Vijjācharanasampanno, Sugato, Lokavidū, Anuttarro
purisadamma sārathi, Satthā devamanussānan, Buddho, Bhagavā ti.
§ It is imperative to break the phrase “itipi so” to two words; “so” means “him.”
§ Most people recite it as a single word “itipiso” and that gives not only an incorrect but a
derogatory meaning: “piso” is for “pisācha” or a “lowly being like a preta.”
§ “itipi so Bhagavā” means “because of (the following qualities) he (Buddha) is.”
§ The recital should break at places where there is a comma to state each quality separately, and
should not break in the middle (e.g., no breaks in Anuttarro purisadamma sārathi); audio
recording is given below.
1. There are 9 qualities of the Buddha, and each is said to be impossible for a human being to
describe fully.
§ As one learns more and more Dhamma, one truly begins to understand the value of a Buddha. It
is said that an Anāgāmī can better understand the qualities of a Buddha than a Sotāpanna, and
an Arahant even better.
2. Here are the list of the 9 qualities:
§ Arahan – “A” + “rahan” or not a trace of defilement (attachment for sense pleasures) left.
§ Sammasambuddho – “San” +”mā” + “sambhava” + “uddha”, or who discovered the way to
dissociate from this suffering-filled world by removing “san“; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of
Sansāra (or Saṃsāra)“.
§ Vijjacharanasampanno – “Vijjā” (science or knowledge) + “carana” + “san” + “panno”, or
perfectly knowledgeable about how the world arises (out of “san”).
§ Sugato – Ultimate in “su” + “gathi” or “good qualities.”
§ Lokavidü – “Loka” + “vidü”, or having the ability to examine and explain any of the three
worlds that encompass everything: world of mental formations (Sankharaloka), world of beings
(Sattaloka), world of things (Okasaloka).
§ Anuttaro purisadammasārathi – “Purisa” here is not a gender: purisa dhamma are the highest
qualities; “anuttara” means unmatched. [purisadammasārathi : the modesty of the man.
damma :[adj.] tamed or trained. sārathi :[m.] a charioteer; a coachman; a driver.]
§ Satthā devamanussanan – Teacher of celestial and human beings.
§ Buddho – Perfectly Enlightened, uprooted all “bhava”.
§ Bhagavā or Bhagavath – “Bha” + “ga” + “vatha” – Able to examine a living being’s origin in
many different ways. Here “Bha” is bhava or existence and “ga” means connection or
relationship, and “vatha” is the form of any being.
3. The above are of course not the only meanings. Since each word describes the infinite qualities of
the Buddha, there are other meanings as well. Thus it is best not to really get hang-up on the
translations above.
§ It is best to get an idea of what these qualities and ALWAYS recite them in Pāli. As one’s
understanding grows, one will realize the meanings better.
§ Pāli is a phonetic language. Meanings come via sounds. Thus what is imperative is to be able to
recite the Pāli phrase above to the best to one’s ability. I have provided the recordings at the
end of the post, where my teacher Thero recites them as they should be recited.
Supreme Qualities of the Dhamma (Dhaham Guna)
There are six supreme qualities of Dhamma:
Svakkatho, Bhagavathā dhammo, sandiṭṭhiko, akaliko, ehipassiko, opanayiko, paccattam vedittabbo
vinnuhi ti.
First, Bhagavathā dhammo is the Dhamma taught by the Buddha.
§ Svakkatho – leads to the removal of sansāric suffering via getting out of the 31 realms. Here
“svakkata” (“sva” for “self” and “akkata” or “akrutha” or “akriya” means putting out of action)
means getting rid of the concept of a “me” (asmai māna). It is not about whether a “self” exists
or not; it is rather to realize that nothing in this world is worth to be considered “mine”.
§ Sandiṭṭhika – It allows one to comprehend “san” (“san” + “diṭṭhi”), the key reason for the
existence in this world; see, “What is “San”? Meaning of Sansāra (or Saṃsāra).”
§ Akaliko – This Dhamma does not change over time; it is the same Dhamma that is delivered by
all Buddhas (“a” + “kālika”). Another meaning is that it leads to the removal of darkness (due
to avijjā); here “kalu” means “black” or “darkness.”
§ Ehipassiko – “Ehi” + “passika” or defilement can be removed (“passika”) when
each ārammaṇa comes to the mind (“Ehi”). One does not wait to remove defilement in a
formal meditation session. Rather, one takes care of that at each instant when an immoral
thought comes to the mind (with ānāpāna or satipaṭṭhāna).
§ Opanayiko – “Opa” + “naiko”, where “Opa” means “upatha” or “origins” and “nyāya” means
the principle or the nature. Thus it means one can comprehend how each existence (bhava and
jāti) arises.
§ Paccattam vedittabbo vinnuhi- “paccaya” can be understood by looking at the origins (veda
or vedic): vedittabbo. “Vinnu” means the hidden can be seen (like something hidden in a vessel
by piercing it). Anything in this world arises due to paṭicca samuppāda; thus, Dhamma
allows one to “see through” how this whole world, together with all the suffering arises.
Here is a recital of the Namaskaraya by the Venerable Thero (you need to adjust volume control on
your computer). It is normally recited three times:
WebLink: Listen to the verses of Namaskaraya recital
Here is a recording of the Tiratana vandana by the Venerable Thero (You need to control the volume
level on your computer)
WebLink: Listen to the verses of Tiratana Vandana
Pāli text (click to open the pdf file):
WebLink: PDF File: Tiratana Vandana
More audio files are at: “Sutta Chanting (with Pali Text).”
1. The five precepts (pañca sīla; pronounced “pancha seela”) are normally recited after paying
homage to the Buddha (Namaskaraya), and then taking the refuge (Tisarana), i.e., one says nine
times that one takes the refuge in the Buddha, Dhamma, and the Saṅgha. In the following they are
combined, as customary; see the previous post for pronunciations and details.
§ Even for a Buddhist, it is not necessary to recite the precepts.
§ It is important to keep in mind that JUST BY RECITING PRECEPTS does not do anything to
purify the mind. The Buddha said, “yam samadanan tan vathan, sanvarattena seelan“, or
“reciting precepts is a ritual (“vatha“), moral behavior is attained by seeing and controlling
‘san‘”.
§ However, it is good to recite Namaskaraya, Tisarana, and the precepts, to attain citta pasada or
calmness and joy of mind especially before a formal meditation session. If one does it WITH
UNDERSTANDING and RESOLVE, it can bring benefits.
§ Furthermore, reciting precepts and suttas is preferred by those with developed saddhā (faith)
indriya; see, “Panca Indriya and Panca Bala – Five Faculties and Five Powers“. For those who
lack saddhā indriya, this may be something they want to consider doing.
2. It is important to realize that the five precepts have deep meanings, and thus should not be taken
lightly; see, “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them“. The true meaning of the five
precepts are discussed there.
§ Only an Arahant is capable of strictly keeping those precepts (abstaining from all ten
defilements or dasa akusala); thus one needs to recite with the intention of doing one’s best
to keep the precepts. Otherwise, we will be lying from the outset.
Here a Venerable Thero is reciting the Namaskaraya, Tisarana, and the five precepts with the
audience repeating them (volume adjustment on the right):
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Pansil
Here is a pdf file with the text and translation:
WebLink: PDF File: Panca Sīla (click to open)
3. To emphasize, these English translations are the conventional (“padaparama“) or mundane ones
and the real meanings are discussed in “The Five Precepts – What the Buddha Meant by Them“.
Also, while reciting, one needs to keep in mind that one is promising do one’s best to keep the
precepts.
You can use the below link to open the file. You can play it there or right-click on the screen and
choose “save as...” to save to your computer.
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Karaniya Metta Sutta
Pāli text (click to open):
WebLink: PDF File: Karaniya Metta Sutta
2. Ratana Sutta (volume adjustment on the right):
1. It is customary to say “Sādhu! Sādhu! Sādhu!” before and after reciting precepts, a meditation
session, chanting sutta, or a meritorious act (by oneself or another). Since anything is done for a
purpose in Buddha Dhamma, it is good to understand why it is done.
§ Sādhu comes from “sa” and “hadaya” or a purified heart (not the physical heart, but the hadaya
vatthu where thoughts arise).
2. It is important to realize that our minds are associated with the hadaya vatthu, which is in the
manomaya kāya and is aligned close to the physical heart; see, “Ghost in the Machine – Synonym for
the Manomaya Kāya?” This is why in a traumatic or joyful event we feel it in the heart, and not in the
brain. Brain is like a computer, and when it is overworked, it causes headaches. But our feelings of
love, hate etc. are felt close to the physical heart, in the hadaya vatthu.
How is one’s heart (and mind) purified?
§ “Kāyena sanvaro sādhu, sādhu vācaya sanvaro; manasā sanvaro sādhu, sādhu sabbatta
sanvaro”
§ “The heart is purified via moral discipline; one needs to act, speak, and think morally”
Thus when a meritorious deed is done by oneself or another, it is customary to say, “sādhu”. It
reinforces the “goodness” of the deed and one makes a determination to do more; the lightness of the
heart can be felt if one does it with understanding.
3. Our hearts are darkened with greed, hate, and ignorance of Tilakkhaṇa. As we purify the mind, the
darkness fades away and the “white light emerges”; it is like lighting a lamp gets rid of the darkness.
Heart becomes joyful.
We get rid of greed, hate, and ignorance via staying away from the ten defilements:
§ When we abstain from killing, stealing, and inappropriate conduct (including but not limited to
sexual conduct), we are cultivating moral discipline through bodily acts.
§ Abstinence from lying, vain talk, gossiping, and hateful speech leads to moral discipline
through speech.
§ When we forcefully control our bodily acts and speech, the mind will gradually calm down
because we thus reduce abhijjā [abhijjhā] (strong greed) and vyāpāda (strong hate). Then we
can cultivate sammā diṭṭhi via comprehending the Tilakkhaṇa; this leads to reduction of micchā
diṭṭhi too (abhijjā [abhijjhā], vyāpāda, and micchā diṭṭhi are the three akusala kamma done
with the mind). This is the step-by-step procedure that is discussed in the Bhāvanā
(meditation) section.
4. Thus we can see that by saying “sādhu” mindfully, what we are doing is to make a firm
determination to get rid of the ten defilements (dasa akusala) and thus to purify the mind and heart.
Or, we are agreeing with a good deed done by someone else, and share the merits of that deed.
5. Now, what is the significance of putting the open hands together when saying “Sadhu!”?
§ The gesture that we make by opening the hands fully, putting them together, and bringing them
close to the heart or top of head also signify this determination. “With all my heart I make a
commitment”, or “this commitment stands above everything else”, or “I agree wholeheartedly”.
The strengthening of the fingers versus making a fist embody two basic characteristics of human
nature.
§ One makes a fist when hitting someone in anger. Also, someone caught doing a misdeed has
clenched hands in addition to a bent posture (you have seen pictures of criminals being hauled
off to jail in such timid postures).
§ In contrast, open hands indicate “I have not aggressive intentions” as when putting up hands
indicating one has no desire to fight. Furthermore, as you may have noticed, people when say
“Sādhu!” normally have their backs straight too, especially if they are doing with a joyful mind.
6. As mentioned above, one can make a given meritorious deed much more powerful by doing it with
joy and knowledge; such thoughts should be there during that act and also when saying “Sādhu!” at
the beginning and end. The most potent kusala citta are done with “joy and understanding” (“a
somanassa-sahagata, ñāṇa-sampayutta citta”; see, “Javana of a Citta – Root of Mental Power”.
XV Dhammapada
o “Manopubbangamā Dhammā..”
o “Sabba Papassa Akaranan….”
o “Appamado Amata Padam….”
o “Najajja Vasalo Hoti……”
o “Arogya Parama Labha..”
o “Anicca vata Sankhara…”
o “Attā Hi Attano Nātho”
1. These two verses encompass the critical idea in Buddha Dhamma: That mind is at the forefront.
This whole world is made of the mind and has the mind as the basis for everything.
§ Mano is of course the mind. Dhammā (plural, not Buddha Dhamma) are the energies that the
mind generates (via javana power), and those dhammā then give rise everything in this world –
whether living or inert. This analysis can go to profound levels; for the basis of that analysis,
see, “What are rūpa? – Dhammā are rūpa too!.”
§ Pubbangama (pubba + anga) means what comes first. The first line (in both verses) says the
mind creates all dhammā that give rise to everything in this world. The second line says,
everything is prepared (settā) and is a manifestation of the mind (manomayā).
2. Depending on whether one speaks (bhāsati) and acts (karoti) with a defiled (padutta) or a pleasant
(pasanna, Sinhala is prasanna) mind, those dhammā that are generated by the mind lead to (tato
nam) suffering (dukkhamanveti), or happiness (sukhamanveti).
§ In the case of a defiled mind (acting with lobha, dosa, moha), suffering will follow just as a
wheel of a cart follows the footsteps of the ox pulling it (cakkamva vahato padam).
§ In the case of a pleasant, moral mind (acting with alobha, adosa, amoha), happiness will follow
one just as one’s shadow follows oneself (chāyāva anapāyani).
3. These two verses can be interpreted in the mundane way, as outlined in #2 above. Any given task
done with an undefiled mind will always lead to a pleasant and joyous state of mind.
§ There is a more in-depth interpretation. Thoughts, speech, and actions done with a defiled mind
(lobha, dosa, moha) can lead to births in the apāyās and, thus, to high degree of suffering.
Those done with a pleasant mind (alobha, adosa, amoha) will lead to births in the “good
realms”, and will eventually lead to Nibbāna, end of all suffering.
§ The first several subsections of the “Living Dhamma,” discuss the fundamental aspects, which
provide the background needed to go to the deeper issues discussed in the latter subsections
there.
4. Now we can loosely translate the two verses as follows:
§ All phenomena have mind as their forerunner; they all are mind-made. If one speaks or acts
with an evil mind (i.e., engages in dasa akusala), suffering (dukha) will follows just as the
wheels of a cart follow the footsteps of the ox that is pulling the cart.
§ All phenomena have mind as their forerunner; they all are mind-made. If one speaks or acts
with a purified mind (i.e., engages in dasa kusala and puñña kamma), happiness (sukha)
follows one like one’s own shadow that always follows one. That is the source of “nirāmisa
sukha,” which eventually leads to Nibbāna.
I found a youtube video with the Pāli recital; it may take a minute to download. The two verses start
respectively at 0.30 and 2.18 minutes:
WebLink: Youtube: Dhammapada - Yamaka Vaggo - Part 01
Note: “assa” and “passa” same as “āna” and “pāna“; see, “7. What is Ānāpāna?.” For an explanation
on “san,” see, “What is “San”? – Meaning of Saṃsāra.”
Therefore, we can summarize as follows:
“Discard all that is immoral, what should not be done
Take in what is moral by sorting out “san”
Do this by controlling one’s own thoughts (mind)
This is the doctrine of the Buddhas”
Here is a recording of the verse recited by a Venerable Thero; it keeps repeating several times:
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Sabba papassa akaranan
Next, “Appamado Amata Padam….“, ………
very rich person, and the woman was his wife; they both were of “tihetuka birth”, i.e., they were born
due to a very potent good kamma (done with all three good roots of non-greed, non-hate, and
wisdom) from a previous life.
§ Thus, the Buddha said, if they started on the Path when they were very young, the man could
have become an Arahant and the woman an Anāgāmī; if they started when they were young
(20’s), they could have become Anāgāmī/Sakadāgāmī, and if they started on the Path in the
middle age they could have attained Sakadāgāmī/Sotāpanna stages. Instead, they lived a very
lavish life, wasted their wealth, and became beggars. Now they were too old to comprehend
anything.
§ It is unfortunate to see many people today postponing the practice to their “old age”. It is a
good idea to start early and at least keep a slow pace.
§ However, it must be noted that four factors contribute to the capability of attaining Nibbāna:
Ayusa (age), vanna (lively), sukha (comfort), bala (ability). Some people may have sufficient
vanna and bala even at very old age. Thus a normal person cannot look at a given old person
and say, “this person seems too old to attain Nibbāna”. Only a Buddha can determine whether a
person is too old to grasp the Dhamma. Yet, in general, as one becomes older the brain gets
weaker.
5. Here is a recording of the verse recited by a Venerable Thero:
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Appamado
Next, “Najajja Vasalo Hoti..“, …….
When I started writing this post, I erroneously assumed that the above verse is from Dhammapada.
But it turned out that it is actually from the Vasala sutta. However, I decided to put the post in the
Dhammapada section, as it is a nice verse providing insight to the core message of the Buddha.
Let us look at the meaning of different key terms:
§ “Ja” means birth and “jajja” means “by birth” or “related to birth”.
§ “Vasala” or “vasalaya” is a derogatory term identifying someone as an “unworthy” person, not
merely “useless” but “someone not to be associated with”, as if the person has a communicable
disease. Even today, there are such “untouchables” in India even though their conditions have
improved since 1995: WebLink: WIKI: Dalit.
§ In those days, a Brahmin was supposed to be the opposite of a vasalaya, having the highest
social rank. Of the 31 realms of existence, Brahmas occupy the highest 20 realms and are the
beings with highest level of mental states (greedy or hateful thoughts normally do not arise in
them). Thus a Brahmin is supposed to be of highest moral values.
§ Kamma is of course action, and kammana means according to one’s actions.
“It is not the birth that makes a noble person or an ignoble person, but it is one’s actions (the way one
lives one’s life) that determines whether one is a noble person or an ignoble person”.
§ Here one could substitute noble person with a Brahmin and ignoble person with an
untouchable, AND that does not come about by birth but by one’s moral values.
We can make the following deductions using Buddha Dhamma:
§ The more deeper meaning remains hidden for many. In some hospitals in Sri Lanka, the verse,
“Arogya Parama Lābhā“ is displayed in big letters to emphasize the benefits of being healthy.
§ While it is good to abide by those conventional meanings while we live this life, we should also
try to grasp the deeper meanings to embark on the Noble Eightfold Path; see, “Buddha
Dhamma in Chart” and “What is Unique in Buddha Dhamma“.
2. First “parama” means “ultimate” or “prominent”. By the way, the word “pada parama” above
means the interpretation that makes the “conventional meaning of a word prominent”; “pada” is
“word”. Now let us look at the other words in the verse.
3. “Roga” means “disease”, so arogya means not subject to disease. The bodies of all beings below
the Deva lokas (human and below) are subject to disease. We cannot remove the possibility of
disease until we remove causes for us to be reborn in the human realm or the lowest four realms, i.e.,
attain the Sakadāgāmī stage of Nibbāna.
§ “Lābha” is “profit”. The ultimate profit (better than any amount of wealth) of “disease
free” status is attained at the Sakadāgāmī stage of Nibbāna.
§ Actually “arogya” is a Sanskrit word that has become standard. The actual line is, “Aroga
parama lābha”.
4. “Santhutti” comes from “san” + “thutti” or removing “san“. Santhutti and the more common
Sinhala word “santhosa” means happy. When one removes “san“, one gains the nirāmisa sukha of
Nibbāna or “cooling down”.
§ “Dhanan” means “wealth”; Sinhala word is “dhanaya“. Thus ultimate wealth is achieved by
getting rid of “san” or defilements of greed, hate, and ignorance; see, “What is “San”?”.
5. “Vissasa” comes from “vis” + “āsā”, where “āsā” means “āsava” or cravings. Thus it means
getting rid of cravings that makes one bound to the saṃsāra (round of rebirths).
§ “Nātha” means “refuge”; the opposite of that is “anātha” in Sinhala means “helpless”. “Nātha”
is also another word for the Buddha. Thus ultimate refuge is reached via giving up the
cravings for worldly things.
6. The last one, Nibbanan paramam sukhan, or “Nibbāna is the ultimate bliss” is the only one that
has the same meaning as the conventional or “pada parama” version in #1 above.
§ Therefore, when one embarks on the Sotāpanna magga, one should be trying to adhere to the
correct version.
7. Furthermore, the correct Pāli version of the gāthā is:
8. It is interesting to note that this gathā was a popular one among the vedic brahmins of the day of
the Buddha. In the WebLink: suttacentral: Magandhiya sutta (MN 75), it is described how
Magandhiya brahmin tells the Buddha that his teacher also taught him the same verse. When the
Buddha asked him to explain the meaning that his teacher taught him, Magandhiya gave the same
interpretation that was given in #1 above.
§ The Buddha told Magandhiya that this verse came to the vedic literature from Buddha Kassapa
(“Pubbakehesā, māgaṇḍiya, arahantehi sammāsambuddhehi gāthā bhāsitā:”), whose Buddha
sāsana has since disappeared (it is important to note that there had been three Buddhas before
Buddha Gotama in this mahā kalpa, and there will be another, Maithree Buddha, in the future
after the present Buddha sāsana disappears in about 2500 years).
§ This is why only “conventional meanings” of pure Dhamma survives when Ariyas (Noble
Persons) who can correctly interpret the deep meanings in the suttas and verses like this are
absent for long times in this world. Either a Noble Person or a Buddha has to be born to bring
back the true meanings.
§ This is exactly what has happened during the past hundreds of years, where true meanings of
many keywords like anicca, dukkha, anatta, paṭicca samuppāda, and ānāpāna, have been not
known; see, “Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
9. For those who like to dig deeper into Tipiṭaka, the “WebLink: suttacentral: Santuṭṭha Sutta (SN
16.1)” clearly illustrate that “santuttha” is with one who lives a simple life, without minimal
cravings, as Ven. Kassapa did: “..Santuṭṭhāyaṃ, bhikkhave, kassapo itarītarena cīvarena,
itarītaracīvarasantuṭṭhiyā ca vaṇṇavādī; na ca cīvarahetu anesanaṃ appatirūpaṃ āpajjati; aladdhā
ca cīvaraṃ na paritassati; laddhā ca cīvaraṃ agadhito amucchito anajjhāpanno ādīnavadassāvī
nissaraṇapañño paribhuñjati.”.
§ The WebLink: suttacentral: English and WebLink: suttacentral: Sinhala translations at the Sutta
Central site are not too bad.
Uuppajjitvā nirujjhanti
1. Anicca is, of course “cannot be maintained to our satisfaction.” It is NOT just impermanence,
because even permanent things (relative to our lifetime) cannot be maintained to our satisfaction; see,
“Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta – Wrong Interpretations“.
Vata (pronounced as “vatha”) here means “surely” or “indeel”.
(There are other meaning for “vata”: In the verse, “yam samādānaṃ taṃ vataṃn, sanvarattena
sīlaṃ“, or “reciting precepts is a ritual, moral behavior, or sīla, is attained by controlling “san“.
Thus, there “vata” means ritual. Another meaning is “action“. One needs to pick the right meaning
for the given situation).
We think, speak, and take actions based on our manō, vaci, and kāya saṅkhāra. They are all thoughts
(we cannot even lift a finger without an associated thinking). Those saṅkhāra lead to viññāṇa via
“saṅkhāra paccayā viññāṇa” in Paṭicca Samuppāda. Strong viññāṇa produced via
“abhisaṅkhāra” (or strong saṅkhāra) lead to future rebirths. But all births end up in death. See,
“Saṅkhāra – What It Really Means” and “Saṅkhāra, Kamma, Kamma Beeja, Kamma Vipāka.”
§ Thus the first line says, “any vata” or a “person” (that is a result of past abhisaṅkhāra) cannot
be maintained to our satisfaction”.
2. Uppada means arise and vaya means destruction. Uuppajjitvā means that which arises, and nirujja
means fading away. Dhammino (or dhammatha) means the “Nature’s way”.
§ Thus the first line implies that any rebirth (which inevitably arise due to our abhisaṅkhāra
cannot be maintained to our satisfaction. Any birth ends up in death and suffering.
3. Te means “three,” and thus “te san” means three “san” or lobha, dosa, moha; see, “What is “San”?
.”
vūpasama means “remove and get to samādhi.” In the Patisambhidā Magga Pakarana (jhāna
vibhanga section) on p. 55, it explains that, “vitakka vicāra vūpasama” means “getting rid of vitakka
vicāra and attaining savitakka, savicāra.” See, “Vitakka, Vicāra, Savitakka, Savicāra, and Avitakka,
Avicāra.”
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1274 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
Sukha is happiness.
§ Thus the fourth line says, “by removing lobha, dosa, moha (three bad “san”s) from our minds;
we can reach (the ultimate) happiness or Nibbāna.”
Here is a recording of the verse by the Venerable Thero (repeated three times; note the volume
control on right):
WebLink: Listen to verse of : Anichchavatha sankara
§ This verse is a very good kammaṭṭhāna (meditation subject) for cultivating the “anicca saññā.”
One could recite the verse and contemplate on its meaning. Think about all those loved ones
who passed away and led to much suffering. And one’s own death is also inevitable.
§ We have been through this process in perpetuity, being distressed as loved ones are lost and
also thinking about one’s own demise, at every birth.
§ But there is a way to stop this suffering, by following the Path.
§ Thus, instead of getting depressed about the inevitability of death, one WILL start feeling better
if one can really cultivate the “anicca saññā”; see, “How to Cultivate the Anicca Saññā.”
§ This kammaṭṭhāna will also cultivate the “udayavaya ñāna” or “the knowledge about arising
and decay of a sankata.” See, “Udayavaya Ñāna.”
This is an important verse where the word “atta/attā” (pronounced “aththa”/“aththā”) is used with
two very different meanings in two places within the same verse.
§ In the conventional sense, “attā” means “a person”.
§ The deeper meaning of “atta” is “in full control”, the opposite of which is anatta (“helpless”)
as in the Tilakkhaṇa.
§ When one attains the true “atta” state (Nibbāna), one has become “nātha“, which is still used in
Sinhala meaning “found refuge or salvation”. As long as one remains in the 31 realms (this
world), one is “anātha” (which is the Sinhala word for anatta) or “helpless”.
§ “paro siyā” means “outside oneself”. Thus “ko hi nātho paro siyā” means “how can one find
refuge outside oneself”?
§ One becomes atta (attano) by cleansing (one’s mind): sudantena (sudda means “clean”).
§ Labhati means get and dullabhan means rare, and as we saw above “nātha” is attaining
Nibbāna. So, nāthan labhati dullabhan means “it is not easy to get to salvation (Nibbāna)”.
Therefore, we can translate the verse as follows:
“One indeed is one’s own refuge
how can another be a refuge to one?
one reaches salvation by purifying one’s mind
getting to refuge (Nibbāna) is rare”
Here is a recording of the verse recited by me (I could not find a recording by Venerable Waharaka
Thero):
WebLink: Play Dhammapada verse 160
A detailed discussion on “atta/attā” is given in the post, “Pāli Dictionaries – Are They Reliable?“
that I just published.
§ “Satipaṭṭhāna – Introduction”
§ For example, “anicca, dukkha, anatta” are only in the niddesa version in Dhamma Cakka
Pavattana Sutta and Anatta Lakkhana Sutta. [SN 56.11 Rolling Forth the Wheel of Dhamma –
Dhammacakkappavattanasutta, SN 22.59 The Characteristic of Anatta – Anattalakkhaṇasutta]
§ However, each sutta took many hours to deliver. It was not possible to condense all that
information in a sutta for mostly oral transmission that was available at the time. Each sutta is
in a condensed form (most likely by the Buddha himself; see below).
§ Thus the material in each sutta as written in the Tipiṭaka is in CONDENSED form in most
cases. It is in the “niddesa” version. They are in verse format for oral transmission.
3. During the time of the Buddha, other bhikkhus then described in detail each sutta to audiences
when they delivered discourses. That is the “patiniddesa” version. Especially after the Parinibbāna
of the Buddha, many Arahants started writing “Attakathā” or commentaries on essential suttas.
But a few were written during the time of the Buddha.
§ Three of the original books with such early commentaries remain preserved in the Tipiṭaka:
Patisambidhā Magga Prakarana, Nettipparakana, and Petakōpadesa. Of these, the
Patisambidhā Magga Prakarana consists of the analyses by Ven. Sariputta, one of the chief
disciples of the Buddha, and the Nettipparakana by Ven. Maha Kaccāyana. Thus we are lucky
to have these three original commentaries still with us.
§ These three books contain the “patiniddesa” versions of many of the essential suttas, which
describe in detail the keywords/phrases in a given sutta. All other such excellent commentaries
are lost; see, “Incorrect Theravada Interpretations – Historical Timeline” and “Buddhaghōsa
and Visuddhimagga – Historical Background.”
4. In this section, I will be discussing the suttas in the patiniddesa mode, providing explanations of
verses in the Tipitaka with deeper meanings.
§ During the time of the Buddha, some could comprehend just the uddesa version. For example,
Upatissa and Kolita (who became Ven. Sariputta and Ven. Moggalana later) became
Sotāpannas upon hearing the verse, “ye Dhamma hetupabbhavā..…”. They had done much in
© 2019 Lal A. Pinnaduwage
1278 Pure Dhamma: A Quest to Recover Buddha’s True Teachings
their past lives and needed “just a little push” to understand. They are called ugghaṭitañña or
“persons with high wisdom.”
§ And many could understand the niddesa version. Those were vipañcitañña and needed a bit