COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

ENABLING ENVIRONMENT

Related
Sendai Global
Framework Comprehensive BASELINE PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS (Based on DepEd) TARGET/PLANS
for DRR School Safety (CSS) (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020)
(SFDRR) Target Areas
Priorities

YES NO
Priority for Legal Framework & 1 Adopted/adapted/Localized existing policies relating to DRRM in
Action 2 Policies education/school safety.
2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person

Organizational
arrangements, leadership, 3
Priority for and coordination for risk Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from different offices; with
Action 2 reduction and resilience defined membership and roles and responsibilities/functions

Integration of risk 4 Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA and EIE measures,
reduction and
Priority for resilience into covering risk assessment, risk reduction and rehabilitation and recovery.
Action 1 education sector 5 Students participated in the planning process
strategies, policies and
plans 6 Integregated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS
8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

9 Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster or emergency

exist and can easily be tapped.
Funding for risk
Priority for reduction and 10 School has partnership that could be tapped to support its DRRM programs and activities,
Action 3 resilience of education including those after disaster.

11
Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO 23 S 2015)

12 Incorporated results of student-led school watching hazard mapping in the

Priority for Child-centered Risk School DRRM Plan and SIP
Action 1 Assessment
13 Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with the community
hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
14 School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps with education
data to better understand the School's risk.

15 School submitted Rapid Assessment Damage Report (RADAR) to the DRRMS

Priority for Monitoring and Central Office, within 72 hours after the onslaught of hazard in the area
Action 3 Evaluation
16 Data Collection and consolidation of programs and activities on DRRM, covering
the 3 PILLARS, to monitor results and impact exist.
Date Signed and Approved:_________________ ___________________________________________
Name and Signature of School Head
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILAR 1: LEARNING FACILITIES
Related
Sendai
Framework Global Comprehensive BASELINE PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS) DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS (Based on DepEd) TARGET/PLANS
for DRR (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020)
Target Areas
(SFDRR)
Priorities

EXISTING SCHOOLS ARE BEING MADE

Assessment and # of school buildings that has been inventoried

Priority for prioritization for
Action 1 # of school buildings with risk assessment
retrofitting and
replacement of unsafe
schools # of unsafe school buildings identified
YES NO

4 Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building construction exist
Resources and Plan to
Priority 3 address unsafe school
buildings Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed action to address unsafe school
5 building within a specified period.
# of unsafe school buildings with approximate action undertaken by the School Head (e.g.
6 upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.)

Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of facilities conducted ( state how
Maintenance to increase 7 often)
safety and protection of
investments in schools 8 Undertaken regular repair of minor classroom (including facilities) damages
Priority for
Action 3 9 Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined, documented and assigned

School heads have alloted budget for routine maintenance of school facilities for safety and to
10 protect investments, with transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
Planning for limited use of
Priority for schools as evacuation School heads have identified those schools that are expected to be used as temporary
Action 3 centers, during the school 11 evacuation.
year
School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the school in camp management vis-à-
vis the LGU and DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1 , s, of 2013 "Guidelines on
Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA 10821 "Children's Emergency
12 Relief and Protection Act"and its corresponding IRR.
EVERY NEW SCHOOL BUILT IS SAFE
Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
Guidance and regulations
Priority for for safe school 13 SAFE SCHOOL SITE SELECTION
Action 3 construction RESILIENT DESIGN
RESILIENT CONSTRUCTION
New School construction is monitored for complience with:
Monitoring of safe school SAFE SCHOOL SITE SELECTION
Priority for site selection, design and
Action 2 construction SAFE SCHOOL DESIGN
14 SAFE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
Date Signed and Approved:_________________ ___________________________________________
Name and Signature of School Head
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

Related Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework for BASELINE PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS) DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS (Based on DepEd) TARGET/PLANS
DRR (SFDRR) Target Areas (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020)
Priorities

YES NO

School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned into response actions when a
1 disaster strikes (This could be a separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)

2 School has available, accessible and adequate first aid kit in every instructional classroom

School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire
3 extinguisher, handheld/base radio, generator, etc.

School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary Learing Spaces/Shelters in the
4 aftermath of a disaster
Existence of national and
Priority for sub-national plans for
preparedness and School has ready resumption strategies and alternative delivery modeds to ensure
Action 2 response, education 5 education continuity
sector investments
School has ensured that students completed the Family Earthquake Preparedness Plan;
6 and school has reported completion to DepEd DRRM at Central Office.

School has established a school personnel tracking system/protocol in the event of a

7 disaster.

8 School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students and personnel

9 School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and students

School has trained leachers and other personnel who could provide psychosocial support
10 to students

Annual review of school 11 School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM Integration are reviewed annually
disaster risk reduction
Priority for and management
measures (e.g. as part of Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and preparedness measures are in
Action 4 school-based 12 place as per DO
management and/or
school improvements)

13 Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders participated in Brigada Eskwela

School has established functional early warning system to inform students and personnel
of hazards and emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national
14 and LGU warning systems and protocols.
Conduct of regular
simulation drill, at all
levels, to practice
 Conduct of regular
simulation drill, at all
levels, to practice
response preparedness School conducted regular hazard-specific drills(at least 3 hazards) with participation of
and to review response 15 stakeholders (BFP, MEDIC, LGUs , NGOs, COMMUNITY, PTA, ALUMNI, and others.
plans(i.e Contingency
Plan)
16 # of Students who participated in the drills
17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures

Priority for School has student-family reunification plan that is clearly disseminated to students,
Action 4 18 teachers and parents.

Needs assessment 19 School Head has received DRRM training from division or region or partners
strategy, and
Priority for implementation plan to School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from diivision or region or partners
Action 3 develop staff and student 20 (indicate how many)
capacity for participation
in school based DRRM 21 School has conducted awareness and capacity building for families and learners
22 School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the LGU.

Date Signed and Approved:_________________ ___________________________________________

Name and Signature of School Head
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION

Related
Sendai Global
Framework Comprehensive BASELINE PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS (Based on DepEd) TARGET/PLANS
for DRR School Safety (CSS) (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020)
(SFDRR) Target Areas
Priorities

1 has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guided
School ꙱ YES ꙱ NO
Integration of common 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
Priority for risk reduction and
Action 3 resilience messages in the
curriculum 3 Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated

Skills and competencies of students are assessed through measurable learning and risk
4 reduction (RR) outcomes ꙱ YES ꙱ NO
Integration of risk
Priority for reduction and resilience
Action 3 in extra-curricular
activities
5 Percentage of students actively participating in various DRRM/CCA/EiE activities

6 School has DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and school personnel ꙱ YES ꙱ NO
Capacity building for
Priority for and personnel on risk 7 Number of personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA ꙱ YES ꙱ NO
Action 3 reduction and
resilience education 8 School has available and accessible quality and up-to-date DRRM ꙱ YES ꙱ NO

9 Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in it, in every classroom ꙱ YES ꙱ NO

Priority for Monitoring and School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess sustainable
Action 3 Evaluation 10 implementation ꙱ YES ꙱ NO

Date Signed and Approved:_________________ ___________________________________________

Name and Signature of School Head