This document discusses various views on the doctrine of the Trinity that emerged after the Protestant Reformation. It describes how some like the Arminians revived the idea of subordinationism within the Trinity. Others like Swedenborg, Hegel, and Schleiermacher proposed forms of modalism. Socinians and later Unitarians viewed Christ as merely a man and the Holy Spirit as just a power. Some theologians focused on the economic Trinity rather than the ontological Trinity. Barth's view identified God, revelation, and his revealedness as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit respectively. The document goes on to explain that the Trinity refers to three persons in one unity and God's personality is seen through human personality but
This document discusses various views on the doctrine of the Trinity that emerged after the Protestant Reformation. It describes how some like the Arminians revived the idea of subordinationism within the Trinity. Others like Swedenborg, Hegel, and Schleiermacher proposed forms of modalism. Socinians and later Unitarians viewed Christ as merely a man and the Holy Spirit as just a power. Some theologians focused on the economic Trinity rather than the ontological Trinity. Barth's view identified God, revelation, and his revealedness as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit respectively. The document goes on to explain that the Trinity refers to three persons in one unity and God's personality is seen through human personality but
This document discusses various views on the doctrine of the Trinity that emerged after the Protestant Reformation. It describes how some like the Arminians revived the idea of subordinationism within the Trinity. Others like Swedenborg, Hegel, and Schleiermacher proposed forms of modalism. Socinians and later Unitarians viewed Christ as merely a man and the Holy Spirit as just a power. Some theologians focused on the economic Trinity rather than the ontological Trinity. Barth's view identified God, revelation, and his revealedness as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit respectively. The document goes on to explain that the Trinity refers to three persons in one unity and God's personality is seen through human personality but
This document discusses various views on the doctrine of the Trinity that emerged after the Protestant Reformation. It describes how some like the Arminians revived the idea of subordinationism within the Trinity. Others like Swedenborg, Hegel, and Schleiermacher proposed forms of modalism. Socinians and later Unitarians viewed Christ as merely a man and the Holy Spirit as just a power. Some theologians focused on the economic Trinity rather than the ontological Trinity. Barth's view identified God, revelation, and his revealedness as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit respectively. The document goes on to explain that the Trinity refers to three persons in one unity and God's personality is seen through human personality but
2. THE POST REFORMATION PERIOD. We have no further development of the
doctrine of the Trinity, but only encounter repeatedly some of the earlier erroneous constructions of it after the Reformation. The Arminians, Episcopius, Curcellæus, and Limborgh, revived the doctrine of subordination, chiefly again, so it seems, to maintain the unity of the Godhead. They ascribed to the Father a certain pre-eminence over the other persons, in order, dignity, and power. A somewhat similar position was taken by Samuel Clarke in England and by the Lutheran theologian, Kahnis. Others followed the way pointed out by Sabellius by teaching a species of Modalism, as, for instance, Emanuel Swedenborg, who held that the eternal God-man became flesh in the Son, and operated through the Holy Spirit; Hegel, who speaks of the Father as God in Himself, of the Son as God objectifying Himself, and of the Holy Spirit as God returning unto Himself; and Schleiermacher, who regards the three persons simply as three aspects of God: the Father is God as the underlying unity of all things, the Son is God as coming to conscious personality in man, and the Holy Spirit is God as living in the Church. The Socinians of the days of the Reformation moved along Arian lines, but even went beyond Arius, by making Christ merely a man and the Holy Spirit but a power or influence. They were the forerunners of the Unitarians and also of the liberal theologians who speak of Jesus as a divine teacher, and identify the Holy Spirit with the immanent God. Finally, there were also some who, since they regarded the statement of the doctrine of an ontological Trinity as unintelligible, wanted to stop short of it and rest satisfied with the doctrine of an economic Trinity, a Trinity as revealed in the work of redemption and in human experience, as Moses Stuart, W. L. Alexander, and W. A. Brown. For a considerable time interest in the doctrine of the Trinity waned, and theological discussion centered more particularly on the personality of God. Brunner and Barth have again called attention to its importance. The latter places it very much in the foreground, discussing it in connection with the doctrine of revelation, and devotes 220 pages of his Dogmatics to it. Materially, he derives the doctrine from Scripture, but, formally and logically, he finds that it is involved in the simple sentence, "God speaks." He is Revealer (Father), Revelation (Son) and Revealedness (Holy Spirit). He reveals Himself, He is the Revelation, and He is also the content of the Revelation. God and His revelation are identified. He remains God also in His revelation, absolutely free and sovereign. This view of Barth is not a species of Sabellianism, for he recognizes three persons in the Godhead. Moreover, he does not allow for any subordination. Says he: "Thus, to the same God who in unimpaired unity is Revealer, Revelation, and Revealedness, is also ascribed in unimpaired variety in Himself precisely this threefold mode of being." [36]
B. GOD AS TRINITY IN UNITY
The word "Trinity" is not quite as expressive as the Holland word
"Drieeenheid," for it may simply denote the state of being three, without any implication as to the unity of the three. It is generally understood, however, that, as a technical term in theology, it includes that idea. It goes without saying that, when we speak of the Trinity of God, we refer to a trinity in unity, and to a unity that is trinal.
1. THE PERSONALITY OF GOD AND THE TRINITY. As stated in the preceding,
the communicable attributes of God stress His personality, since they reveal Him as a rational and moral Being. His life stands out clearly before us in Scripture as a personal life; and it is, of course, of the greatest importance to maintain the personality of God, for without it there can be no religion in the real sense of the word: no prayer, no personal communion, no trustful reliance and no confident hope. Since man is created in the image of God, we learn to understand something of the personal life of God from the contemplation of personality as we know it in man. We should be careful, however, not to set up man's personality as a standard by which the personality of God must be