HHS Public Access

Author manuscript
Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Author Manuscript

Published in final edited form as:

Birth. 2016 December ; 43(4): 293–302. doi:10.1111/birt.12258.

The effect of perineal lacerations on pelvic floor function and

anatomy at six months postpartum in a prospective cohort of
nulliparous women
Leeman Lawrence [Professor],
Departments of Family and Community Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology at the
University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.
Author Manuscript

Rogers Rebecca [Professor],

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine,
Albuquerque, NM

Borders Noelle [Nurse-Midwife],

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Teaf Dusty [Data Analyst], and

University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM

Qualls Clifford [biostatistician]

Clinical and Translational Research Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center,
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Author Manuscript

Abstract
Objective—Determine the effect of perineal lacerations on pelvic floor outcomes including
urinary and anal incontinence, sexual function and perineal pain in a nulliparous cohort with low
incidence of episiotomy.

Methods—Nulliparous women were prospectively recruited from a midwifery practice. Pelvic

floor symptoms were assessed with validated questionnaires, physical examination and objective
measures in pregnancy and 6 months postpartum. Two trauma groups were compared, those with
an intact perineum or only 1st degree lacerations and those with 2nd, 3rd or 4th degree lacerations.

Results—448 women had vaginal deliveries. 151 sustained second degree or deeper perineal
trauma and 297 had an intact perineum or minor trauma. 336 (74.8%) presented for 6-month
Author Manuscript

follow-up. Perineal trauma was not associated with urinary or fecal incontinence, decreased sexual
activity, perineal pain, or pelvic organ prolapse. Women with trauma had similar rates of sexual
activity however they had slightly lower sexual function scores (27.3 vs. 29.1, p=0.01). Objective
measures of pelvic floor strength, rectal tone, urinary incontinence, and perineal anatomy were
equivalent. The subgroup of women with deeper (> 2cm) perineal trauma demonstrated increased

Corresponding author: Lawrence Leeman, MD, MPH, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico,
MSC09 5040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, 505-272-2165, [email protected].
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Special instructions - None
 Lawrence et al. Page 2

likelihood of perineal pain (15.5 vs. 6.2 %) and weaker pelvic floor muscle strength (61.0 vs.
Author Manuscript

44.3%); p=0.03 compared to women with more superficial trauma Conclusion: Women having
second degree lacerations are not at increased risk for pelvic floor dysfunction other than increased
pain, and slightly lower sexual function scores at 6 months postpartum.

Introduction
Pregnancy and childbirth have been associated with altered pelvic floor function, including
increased rates of urinary and anal incontinence, sexual dysfunction and perineal pain,
however it remains unclear if the relationship persists in spontaneous birth without operative
vaginal delivery, episiotomy or significant perineal lacerations. A meta-analysis of mode of
delivery demonstrated an increased likelihood of stress urinary incontinence for women who
were at one year or more postpartum from a vaginal delivery compared to cesarean delivery
(Odds ratio 1.85 ;95% CI 1.56-2.19).1. The risk of future pelvic organ prolapse is also
Author Manuscript

increased for vaginal, compared to cesarean births. 2-4 Postpartum sexual dysfunction and
dyspareunia have been associated with vaginal birth complicated by perineal laceration and
operative vaginal delivery, however cesarean delivery does not appear to result in improved
sexual function compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery.5-7 Anal incontinence is strongly
associated with the occurrence of anal sphincter laceration;8 however, vaginal birth without
sphincter laceration does not increase the rate of anal incontinence compared to cesarean
delivery.9,10 The majority of women who give birth vaginally sustain at least minor
lacerations,11 however, the impact of perineal lacerations on pelvic floor function has not
been well studied.

Postpartum women and maternity care providers often assume that an intact perineum
implies minimal pelvic floor injury. Vaginal birth in developed nations has been
Author Manuscript

accompanied by high rates of operative vaginal delivery and elective episiotomy 9, which are
the primary factors associated with severe perineal trauma as well as pelvic floor
dysfunction.12 Because of the high rates of these interventions in vaginal birth, the effects of
spontaneous birth without episiotomy or operative delivery on pelvic floor function have not
been studied adequately. In an earlier study, we found no association between the presence
of second-degree perineal lacerations and pelvic floor dysfunction; however, that study was
limited by lack of a pre-delivery assessment of pelvic floor function, inclusion of
multiparous women, short term follow-up and the inability to assess the depth of the second-
degree lacerations.13

The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of perineal lacerations on
postpartum pelvic floor outcomes including urinary and anal incontinence, sexual function
and perineal pain in a low risk nulliparous population with a low utilization of operative
Author Manuscript

vaginal delivery and a very low incidence of episiotomy. A secondary aim was to determine
if the depth of second-degree laceration was associated with pelvic floor functional changes.

Methods
We have previously reported differences in pelvic floor outcomes between women who did
and did not enter the second stage of labor,14 as well as perineal ultrasound measurements

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 3

from this prospective cohort.15 In brief, nulliparous midwifery patients were recruited from
Author Manuscript

2006-2011 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Eligibility criteria were age >18 years of age,
ability to speak and read either English or Spanish, singleton gestation, and absence of
serious medical problems. Women were enrolled during pregnancy into the study from the
antenatal midwifery clinics at a gestational age of ≤ 36 completed weeks. The study was
approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of New Mexico, and all
women gave written consent.

Midwifery patients underwent physical exam early in their prenatal care, which was usually
in first or early second trimester. They provided functional data in early (first or second
trimester) and late (third trimester) pregnancy and again at 6 months postpartum. Physical
exam data collected included Pelvic Floor Quantification Exams (POP-Q)16, assessment of
pelvic floor muscle strength using the Brinks scale17, a paper towel test for urinary
incontinence18 and visual inspection of the perineum., Women underwent rectal exam with
Author Manuscript

quantification of the sphincter strength and tone with a modified Brinks scale. Nurse-
midwife examiners underwent training with live models prior to and annually during the
study; in addition, to ensure standardization of measurements, seventeen exams were
repeated with two examiners to determine inter-rater reliability.

At 6 months postpartum, women completed a paper towel test. With a full bladder, women
were asked to cough three times within a ten second time span, with the paper towel applied
to the perineum..18. Functional data collected included quality of life and symptom severity
scales: the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI)19,20, the Questionnaire for Urinary
Incontinence Diagnosis 19, the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 21,22 and its subscales, the
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire and
the Colorectal Anal Impact Questionnaire , the Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scale 23, the
Author Manuscript

Present Pain Intensity Scale 24 and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).25,26 Any UI
was defined as ISI scores > 0; moderate to severe UI was defined as ISI scores ≥ 320. Any
anal incontinence (flatus, liquid or solid stool) was defined as a Wexner score > 0; fecal
incontinence was defined as an affirmative answer to the questions regarding leakage of
liquid or solid stool. Women were compensated $50.00 at the six-month visit for travel and
babysitting costs, and an additional $25.00 after ultrasound exams. If women did not present
for appointments, they were phoned to reschedule. If they did not keep the second
appointment, women were mailed questionnaires.

Intrapartum data collected at delivery included maternal, fetal, and labor characteristics. The
UNM nurse midwives received extensive training in the identification and anatomic
mapping of perineal and vaginal lacerations which has been previously reported.11,13,27,28
Author Manuscript

The attendant midwife recorded perineal trauma immediately after delivery on standardized
forms Severity of trauma was categorized for perineal lacerations into first, second, third and
fourth degree lacerations.. Women without any trauma were described as intact. The depth
of second degree perineal lacerations were measured29 from the posterior margin of the
genital hiatus to the laceration apex on each side (right (X) and left (Y)) and the average was
recorded as the laceration length {(X + Y)/2} as described by Nager. Trauma was
dichotomized into perineal trauma (second, third or fourth degree lacerations) compared to
intact/minor trauma (intact or had only first-degree perineal or non-perineal trauma) for the

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 4

primary analysis. For secondary analysis, women with deep second degree perineal
Author Manuscript

lacerations that were > 2cm or had anal sphincter lacerations were compared to women with
an intact perineum, first degree perineal, vaginal lacerations and/or second degree
lacerations that were ≤ 2.0 cm in depth. A second observer was asked to assess the perineum
for lacerations greater than or equal to a second-degree laceration. Perineal trauma suturing
was standardized using an anatomic approach as previously described,30 and all midwives
participated in annual laceration repair workshops.

For the parent study examining pelvic floor outcomes based on mode of delivery, we aimed
to recruit 630 nulliparous women from the nurse-midwifery clinics and anticipated that 20%
of women would not deliver with the midwifery service. In addition, 50 midwife patients
were expected to deliver by cesarean. With an assumption of 75% follow-up, we estimated
that 375 women experiencing vaginal birth would give data at 6 months postpartum. The
parent study had adequate power to test for prevalence of anal incontinence, urinary
Author Manuscript

incontinence and sexual activity at six-month postpartum follow-up between mothers who
delivered vaginally and by cesarean delivery.14 For our subgroup analysis of women having
a vaginal birth our sample size at six months was 217 women with an intact perineum or
minimal trauma and 118 in the perineal trauma group. This was adequate to detect
differences between groups of 16% for AI, 6.5% for fecal incontinence, 16.5% for urinary
incontinence (ISI) and 13% for lack of sexual activity with 80% power and alpha =0.05
retrospective calculations. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups at baseline and
follow-up; categorical data were compared using Fischer’s exact test or chi-square analyses
where appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using t tests. Wilcoxon rank sums
were used for nonparametric analysis when a non-normal distribution was determined to be
present for the variables.
Author Manuscript

Results
Of 627 women recruited, 541 delivered with the midwifery service. Eighty-six women left
midwifery care secondary to early pregnancy loss, relocation, insurance changes or medical
complications of pregnancy. Ninety-three women delivered by cesarean section were
excluded, leaving 448 women with vaginal deliveries (Figure 1). One hundred and fifty-one
women sustained perineal trauma (129 second degree, 19 third degree s, and 3 fourth degree
perineal lacerations) and 297 women delivered with an intact genital tract or with minor
trauma (210 and 87 women, respectively). Of the 129 second degree lacerations; 52 were
greater than 2 cm in depth, 39 were ≤ 2 cm, and 38 did not have the depth recorded.

Of the 448 women who delivered vaginally, 335 (74.8%) presented for 6-month follow-up
and were included in the primary analysis as Perineal trauma and Intact/minor groups. The
Author Manuscript

secondary analysis compared the 61 women with deep lacerations (2nd degree >2cm, 3rd and
4th degrees) to the 245 women who were intact or had nondeep trauma and returned for six-
month follow-up. The population that did not return for follow-up was slightly younger
(22.5 vs. 24.4years; p<0.001) and reported fewer years of education (13.1vs. 14.1years;
p<0.001) but did not differ with regard to antenatal assessment of urinary or anal
incontinence, sexual activity, or perineal pain. A greater proportion of the group lost to

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 5

follow-up received oxytocin in labor (56.8 vs. 44.9%; p=0.04); however, the groups did not
Author Manuscript

differ in other labor or childbirth variables.

Few women underwent operative vaginal delivery for a nulliparous group; 25 vacuum
deliveries and 1 forceps delivery represented 5.8% of deliveries. Only 8 (2%) women
underwent episiotomy. Of the women who sustained second-degree lacerations or greater
(77/129), 60% had a second observer to verify the extent of the laceration; all but one of the
second observers agreed with the second-degree diagnosis. During the antepartum
measurement of the perineal body and genital hiatus, 17 women underwent repeat exams for
inter-rater reliability testing of the POP-Q exam; agreement between examiners was high
(82% complete agreement) for prolapse stage. All POP-Q points were within 1 cm of
agreement for 82% of measures, and perineal body measurements were within 0.5 cm for
82% of measures.
Author Manuscript

Demographics and obstetric characteristics

Women experiencing perineal trauma were older (25. vs. 23.0; p<0.001), had more years of
education (14.9 vs. 13.3; p< 0.001)), and were slightly taller (64.7 vs. 63.7 cm; p<. 001)
(Table1). Hispanic women were more likely to experience perineal trauma than non-
Hispanic white women (53.6% vs 37.7%, p <0.001). Higher mean birth weight was
associated with increased likelihood of perineal trauma (3304 vs. 3171 gm; p=0.001) and
having a small for gestational age (SGA) infant was protective with 2% of newborns being
SGA in the perineal trauma group compared to 7.1% in the group with minor trauma or an
intact perineum (p=0.03). Of the labor variables, the length of active second stage (95 vs. 61
3 minutes; p<0.0001) and an infant delivering occiput posterior or transverse (6.0% vs.
1.6%; p=0.02) were associated with increased likelihood of perineal trauma and delivery
between contractions was protective. The groups did not differ in antenatal assessments of
Author Manuscript

urinary and anal incontinence, or perineal pain (all P >.0.05). The group who delivered with
intact perineum or minor trauma had higher antenatal sexual function based on Female
Sexual Function Index scores (26.9 vs 25.3; p=0.03) and was more likely to have been
sexually active in the third trimester (82.4 vs 65.1%; p<0.001).

Urinary and anal incontinence

Perineal trauma was not associated with urinary incontinence as measured on patient
questionnaires at 6 months postpartum or as objectively by the paper towel test (Table 2).
These outcomes were unchanged when comparing the women with deeper lacerations (2nd >
2cm, 3rd and 4th degree) to all other women. A higher proportion of women with perineal
trauma reported at least one incident of anal incontinence (includes flatus) on the Wexner
scale (57.8 vs. 45.3%, p=0.03). The proportion of women with fecal incontinence did not
Author Manuscript

differ between the trauma groups. When women with perineal lacerations were split into
three groups (intact /first degree, 2nd versus 3rd/4th lacerations) reports of anal incontinence
increased from 45% to 55% to 72% respectively. A pairwise comparison between the three
groups using Fischer’s exact test demonstrated that rates of anal incontinence only varied
between women with an intact perineum/1st degree tear and women with 3rd or 4th degree
lacerations (p=0.047). Women with perineal trauma and any anal incontinence did not have
worse symptoms based on the Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scale score or a greater effect on

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 6

their quality of life based on Colorectal Anal Impact Questionnaire compared to women
Author Manuscript

without perineal trauma.

Pelvic floor strength and anatomy

On physical examination at 6 months postpartum there was no difference in the presence of
pelvic organ prolapse as measured by POP-Q stages or individual POP-Q points. At 6
months, objective analysis of pelvic floor strength on Kegel exam, as well as rectal resting
and squeeze tone did not differ between the groups. Perineal body and genital hiatus length
were also similar. On transperineal ultrasound (n=291) all women in the intact or minor
trauma group had an intact external anal sphincter and only 1.9% of the perineal trauma
group has a defect in the external anal sphincter.. A greater proportion of women in the
perineal trauma group had a nonintact internal anal sphincter (15.1 vs. 7.0 %, p=0.04) on
transperineal ultrasound (n-289). In the subgroup analysis of deeper lacerations women with
Author Manuscript

deep trauma were more likely to have weaker pelvic floor muscle strength as measured by
the Brinks scale for Kegel (61.0 vs. 44.3%; p=0.03). In an additional analysis (not shown) in
which the women with 3rd and 4th degree lacerations were excluded from the deep trauma
group, the finding of weaker Kegel muscle strength (53.7% vs 44.3%; p=0.07) was still
present, although no longer statistically significant.

Pain and Sexual Function

The presence of perineal pain at 6 months did not differ significantly when assessed by a
Likert scale or visual analog scale for the primary analysis groups. In the subgroup analysis
of women with deep perineal trauma a greater proportion reported perineal pain at 6 months
than women with less severe trauma (15.5 vs. 6.2%; p=0.01), however the severity of pain
was not different between groups (0.38 vs. 0.12; p=0.19). When women with 3rd and 4th
Author Manuscript

degree lacerations were excluded from the deep trauma group the findings of a greater
proportion of women with pain at 6 months (17.8% vs 6.2%, p=0.04) was still present.

Perineal trauma was not associated with a difference in sexual activity at six months
postpartum, however women with perineal trauma had lower scores on the Female Sexual
Function Index indicating poorer sexual function (27.3 vs 29.1; p=0.01) The differences
were attributable to lower scores in the FSFI domains of arousal, pain and satisfaction The
findings of lower FSFI scores was also present in subgroup analysis of deeper lacerations
based on domains of arousal and pain.

Discussion
We found that perineal trauma in a study cohort with low rates of operative vaginal delivery
Author Manuscript

and episiotomy is associated with minimal pelvic floor dysfunction at six months
postpartum. Rates of urinary and anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual
activity were similar between trauma groups other than an increased incidence of anal
incontinence attributable to the subgroup with 3rd and 4th degree lacerations. There was a
small decrease in sexual function scores in the perineal trauma group that is unlikely of
clinical significance. Although likelihood of pain was greater with trauma overall levels of
perineal pain were low. Objective incontinence measures including rectal tone, Brink’s

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 7

pelvic floor muscle strength, the paper towel test were also similar. Perineal measurements
Author Manuscript

(Genital Hiatus and Perineal Body on the POPQ examinations) were not different between
groups. Women can be reassured that spontaneous perineal trauma is unlikely to result in
adverse pelvic floor functional outcomes at 6 months postpartum.

An intact perineum after childbirth remains a desirable obstetrical outcome as women report
a decrease in immediate and six month postpartum pain compared with women having
spontaneous lacerations or an episiotomy.27,31 Similar to other researchers, we found that
some patient characteristics including age, race, height, and education were associated with
perineal trauma. Higher rates of sexual activity and higher sexual function scores on the
Female Sexual Function Index in the 3rd trimester were associated with less perineal trauma.
Although an association between antenatal sexual function and less perineal trauma has not
been previously reported, perineal massage in the third trimester is associated with a
decrease in perineal trauma for nulliparous women.32 Newborn weight is associated with
Author Manuscript

perineal trauma; avoiding macrosomia and excessive prenatal weight gain are also advisable
to decrease the incidence of cesarean delivery.33 A prolonged second stage is associated with
occurrence of perineal trauma; however, given the association of operative vaginal delivery
and episiotomy with anal sphincter trauma, these interventions are not appropriate to shorten
the second stage unless indications are present. Delivering between uterine contractions was
protective of the perineum confirming a similar finding from the INTACT study at our
institution.11 The association between occiput posterior presentation and perineal trauma
suggests potential benefit from manual rotation to occiput anterior which has been
previously demonstrated to decrease the incidence of cesarean delivery and severe perineal
lacerations.34

Strengths of our study include following women prospectively during pregnancy and
Author Manuscript

through the 6-month postpartum visits, multidimensional assessment of pelvic floor

function, and inclusion of physical exam findings and functional questionnaire data.
Limitations include the primary assessment of pelvic floor function occurring at six months
while the timing of onset of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence may be many
years after delivery. We included measurements of subtle pelvic floor dysfunction: including
any anal incontinence including loss of flatus, any urinary incontinence, pelvic muscle
strength, rectal tone and any change in pelvic floor anatomy demonstrable by the POP-Q to
potentially identify women at increased future risk. The group with an intact perineum or
minor trauma had higher sexual function scores in the 3rd trimester and postpartum
differences may be at least partially attributable to the baseline differences. In addition, 38
(29%) of subjects did not have the depth of their perineal lacerations measured. The
measurement of the depth of the laceration was done to decrease the likelihood that
Author Manuscript

clinically trivial second degree lacerations were affecting our ability to detect an effect of
deeper second degree lacerations. We used the measurement technique developed by
Nager29 and second examiners to increase the reliability of these measurements, however it
is unknown what depth might have clinical importance and we chose a 2cm cutoff to
dichotomize the groups. Our power to detect differences in the subgroup with deep second
degree perineal trauma was limited by the smaller number of women.

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 8

Our study population had a low incidence of episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery for
Author Manuscript

nulliparous women. The national operative vaginal delivery rate for all women in 2012 was
3.40% of which 2.79% were vacuum assisted and 0.61%, forceps35; in 1990, the operative
vaginal delivery rate was 9.01%, which included a forceps rate of 5.11%. The rate of
episiotomy decreased from 60.9% in 1979 to 11.1 % in 2009. 36, 30,37. The frequency of
episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery in our cohort is consistent with current
recommendations against routine use of episiotomy and the national fall in operative vaginal
delivery rates; therefore, our study results are applicable to current obstetric practice.
Although the study population was a healthy cohort of nulliparous patients cared for by
nurse midwives, similar rates of episiotomy and operative delivery are found in our
University of New Mexico patients managed by obstetrician/gynecologists and family
physicians.38

Midline episiotomy is the prevalent practice in the United States, and its association with
Author Manuscript

anal sphincter laceration has been shown in numerous studies. Many other countries
predominantly perform medial lateral episiotomy; our results are not applicable to these
women as medial lateral episiotomy has been shown to produce different anatomic outcomes
with regards to anal sphincter and anterior vaginal trauma 39,40 Postpartum pelvic floor
function studies are needed including comparison groups of women sustaining midline vs.
medial lateral episiotomy and with sutured vs. unsutured 2nd degree lacerations.

Prevention of second-degree lacerations remains a desirable childbirth outcome due to the

increased pain secondary to the lacerations and the prevention anal sphincter lacerations is
beneficial due to the strong association with future anal incontinence. Women having second
degree lacerations, even when the depth is greater than 2 cm, can be reassured that they are
not at increased risk for urinary or anal incontinence, delayed return of sexual activity or
Author Manuscript

measurable changes in perineal and vaginal anatomy at 6 months postpartum. Although

women with these lacerations are more likely to have perineal pain at six months, eighty-two
percent will be free of pain.

In conclusion, we found that spontaneous perineal trauma was not associated with increased
risk of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction based on a comprehensive assessment of
functional and anatomic outcomes. Delivery between contractions, manual rotation from
occiput posterior position, and sparse use of episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery may
contribute to lower rates of perineal trauma.

Acknowledgments
Funding: The project was Supported by NICHD 1R01HD049819-01A2 and National Center for Research
Author Manuscript

Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health
through Grant Number 8UL1TR000041.

References
1. Tahtinen RM, Cartwright R, Tsui JF, et al. Long-term Impact of Mode of Delivery on Stress Urinary
Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
European urology. Jul; 2016 70(1):148–158. [PubMed: 26874810]

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 9

2. Trutnovsky G, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: a
retrospective observational study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
Author Manuscript

Aug; 2016 123(9):1551–1556. [PubMed: 26435045]

3. Leijonhufvud A, Lundholm C, Cnattingius S, Granath F, Andolf E, Altman D. Risks of stress
urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. Jan; 2011 204(1):70 e71–77. [PubMed: 21187196]
4. Handa VL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Munoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years
afters vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. Oct; 2011 118(4):777–784. BJ. [PubMed:
21897313]
5. De Souza A, Dwyer PL, Charity M, Thomas E, Ferreira CH, Schierlitz L. The effects of mode
delivery on postpartum sexual function: a prospective study. BJOG : an international journal of
obstetrics and gynaecology. Sep; 2015 122(10):1410–1418. [PubMed: 25752211]
6. Leeman LM, Rogers RG. Sex after childbirth: postpartum sexual function. Obstet Gynecol. Mar;
2012 119(3):647–655. [PubMed: 22353966]
7. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Postpartum sexual functioning and its
relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet
Author Manuscript

Gynecol. Apr; 2001 184(5):881–888. discussion 888-890. [PubMed: 11303195]

8. Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after
vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. Dec; 2003 189(6):1543–1549. discussion 1549-1550. [PubMed: 14710059]
9. Bols EM, Hendriks EJ, Berghmans BC, Baeten CG, Nijhuis JG, de Bie RA. A systematic review of
etiological factors for postpartum fecal incontinence. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
Mar; 2010 89(3):302–314. [PubMed: 20199348]
10. Evers EC, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Handa VL. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal
incontinence 5-10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov; 2012 207(5):425 e421–426.
[PubMed: 22831810]
11. Albers LL, Sedler KD, Bedrick EJ, Teaf D, Peralta P. Midwifery care measures in the second stage
of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: a randomized trial. Journal of midwifery &
women's health. Sep-Oct;2005 50(5):365–372.
12. Johannessen HH, Wibe A, Stordahl A, Sandvik L, Backe B, Morkved S. Prevalence and predictors
of anal incontinence during pregnancy and 1 year after delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Author Manuscript

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Feb; 2014 121(3):269–279.

[PubMed: 24021090]
13. Rogers RG, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Albers LL. Does the severity of spontaneous genital tract
trauma affect postpartum pelvic floor function? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. Mar;
2008 19(3):429–435. [PubMed: 17896065]
14. Rogers RG, Leeman LM, Borders N, et al. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic
floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women. BJOG : an international
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Aug; 2014 121(9):1145–1153. discussion 1154. [PubMed:
24548705]
15. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG. Postpartum translabial
2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women
delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery. International urogynecology journal. Mar;
2014 25(3):329–336. [PubMed: 24105408]
16. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ
Author Manuscript

prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul; 1996 175(1):10–17. [PubMed:
8694033]
17. Sampselle CM, Wells TJ. Digital measurement of pelvic muscle strength in childbearing women.
Nurs Res. May-Jun;1989 38(3):134–138. BC. [PubMed: 2717436]
18. Miller JM, Delancey JC. Quantification of cough-related urine loss using paper towel test. Obstet
Gynecol. May; 1989 91(5):705–709. A-MJ.
19. Bradley CS1, Morgan MA, Berlin M, Novi JM, Shea JA, Arya LA. A new questionnaire for
urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan;
2005 192(1):66–73. RE. [PubMed: 15672005]

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 10

20. Hanley J1, Hagen S. Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence
in women. BMJ. May 5.2001 322:1096–1097. CA. [PubMed: 11337439]
Author Manuscript

21. Barber MD1, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for
women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul; 2005 193(1):
103–113. WM. [PubMed: 16021067]
22. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive
condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. Dec; 2001 185(6):1388–1395. [PubMed: 11744914]
23. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. Jan;
1993 36(1):77–97. [PubMed: 8416784]
24. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. Aug; 1987 30(2):191–197. [PubMed:
3670870]
25. Rosen R1, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The female
sexual function index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of
female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. Apr-Jun;2000 26(2):191–208. BC. [PubMed:
10782451]
Author Manuscript

26. CM M. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic
disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther. Jan-Feb;2003
29(1):39–46. [PubMed: 12519665]
27. Leeman L, Fullilove AM, Borders N, Manocchio R, Albers LL, Rogers RG. Postpartum perineal
pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth
variables. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.). Dec; 2009 36(4):283–288.
28. Albers LL. Minimizing genital tract trauma and related pain following spontaneous vaginal birth. J
Midwifery Women's Health. May-Jun;2007 52(3):246–253. BN. [PubMed: 17467591]
29. Nager CW, Helliwell JP. Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug; 2001 185(2):444–450. [PubMed: 11518907]
30. Leeman L, Spearman M, Rogers R. Repair of obstetric perineal lacerations. Am Fam Physician.
Oct 15; 2003 68(8):1585–1590. [PubMed: 14596447]
31. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal
delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct; 2004 191(4):1199–1204.
Author Manuscript

[PubMed: 15507941]
32. Beckmann MM, Stock OM. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. The
Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013; 4:CD005123.
33. Dzakpasu S, Fahey J, Kirby RS, et al. Contribution of prepregnancy body mass index and
gestational weight gain to caesarean birth in Canada. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;
14:106. [PubMed: 24641703]
34. Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Caughey AB. Manual rotation to reduce caesarean delivery in
persistent occiput posterior or transverse position. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal
medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation
of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. Jan; 2011
24(1):65–72.
35. Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Division of Vital Statisctics. Births: Final Data
for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013:62. HB.
36. Frankman EA, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. May.2009 200(5):573. WL. [PubMed: 19243733]
Author Manuscript

37. Martin JA, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kiremeyer S, Mathews TJ, Wilson EC. Births: final data for
2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. Nov; 2011 60(1):1–70. HB.
38. Garcia V, Rogers RG, Kim SS, Hall RJ, Kammerer-Doak DN. Primary repair of obstetric anal
sphincter laceration: a randomized trial of two surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May;
2005 192(5):1697–1701. [PubMed: 15902180]
39. Vathanan V, Ashokkumar O, McAree T. Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk reduction: a
retrospective observational analysis. Journal of perinatal medicine. Nov 1; 2014 42(6):761–767.
[PubMed: 24695035]

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 11

40. Cam C, Asoglu MR, Selcuk S, Aran T, Tug N, Karateke A. Does mediolateral episiotomy decrease
central defects of the anterior vaginal wall? Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. Feb; 2012
Author Manuscript

285(2):411–415. [PubMed: 21735189]

Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 12
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 1.
Study Participants
Author Manuscript

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 13

Table 1

Maternal characteristics, antenatal pelvic floor anatomy function, and labor care measures in women who
Author Manuscript

sustained perineal trauma and those who delivered intact or who had minor trauma, University of New Mexico
2006-2011

Intact/Minor Perineal trauma P

laceration (≥ 2nd degree laceration)
N=297 n=151
Maternal characteristics % or mean+/−SD % or mean+/−SD
Age (years) 23.0+/−4.4 25.7+/−5.3 <0.0001
Years of education 13.3+/−2.4 14.9+/−2.7 <0.001
Body Mass Index 24.6+/− 5.6 24.8+/−4.8 0.75
Weight Gain in pregnancy 35.5+/−13.1 35.5+/−14.8 0.99
(lb.)
Race
NonHispanic White <0.01*
Author Manuscript

50.5% 33.8%
Native American 5.4% 6.6%
Other 6.4% 6.0%
Tobacco Use 6.4% 7.3% 0.84
Antenatal Pelvic Floor Anatomy (at prenatal presentation for care)
Perineal Body Length cm 3.6 +/− 0.8 3.7 +/− 0.8 0.28
Genital Hiatus (rest) cm 2.5+/− 0.8 2.4+/− 0.8 0.36
Genital Hiatus (strain) cm 2.7+/− 0.8 2.6+/− 0.8 0.40
Antenatal Pelvic Floor Function (3rd Trimester)
Any Anal Incontinence 15.7% 15.2% 1.00
Any Urinary Incontinence 72.1% 74.1% 0.73
ISI scores among those with 2.2 +/− 1.4 2.5+/− 1.7 0.16
Author Manuscript

any incontinence
Female Sexual Function Index 26.9+/− 5.8 25.3+/− 5.9 0.03
Score
Sexually active 82.4% 65.1% <0.001
Perineal pain VAS Score 0.9+/− 1.6 0.9+/− 1.6 0.99
Labor birth outcomes
SGA 7.1% 2.0% 0.03
Epidural 60.9% 58.7% 0.64
Oxytocin 45.2% 53.0% 0.12
Occiput posterior/transverse 1.7% 6.0% 0.02
Delivered During Contraction 26.3% 37.8% 0.03
Length of active 2nd stage 60.6 +/− 48.3 94.8 +/−81.4 <.0001
Minutes
Author Manuscript

Birth Weight gms 3171+/−438 3304+/−384 0.001

VAS: analogue scale

SGA; Small for gestational age, ISI Incontinence Severity Index;
*
A Comparison of NHW to HW is <0.001 while all other comparisons are NS

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 14

Table 2

Perineal trauma and six month postpartum pelvic floor outcomes, University of New Mexico 2006-2011
Author Manuscript

Outcome measure Intact/ Perineal trauma P value

Minor (≥ 2nd degree
laceration laceration)
N=217 N=118
% or Mean+−SD % or Mean+−SD

Anal and Urinary Incontinence

Any Anal incontinence (Wexner≥1) 45.3% 57.8% 0.03
Fecal incontinence response, positive 7.1% 10.3% 0.30
response on Wexner
Wexner scores among those with any anal 1.9+/− 1.9 2.1+/− 1.7 0.44
incontinence Fecal Incontinence Index
(N=163)
Any urinary incontinence ISI>0 53.1% 59.8% 0.25
Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) among 1.7+/− 1.0 1.8+/−1.23 0.80
those with any urinary incontinence on ISI
Author Manuscript

(N=183)
Sexual Function and Perineal Pain
Sexually active 87.8% 87.1% 0.86
Female Sexual Function Index 29.1+/− 5.1 27.3+/− 5.8 0.01
Individual Responses on Female Sexual Function Index
Desire 3.9+/−1.27 3.7+/−1.20 0.11
Arousal 4.4+/−1.77 3.8+/−1.86 <0.01
Lubrication 4.6+/−1.87 4.2+/−2.15 0.09
Orgasm 4.4+/−1.91 3.9+/−2.10 0.07
Satisfaction 4.8+/−1.41 4.5+/−1.44 0.05
Pain 5.2+/−1.04 4.8+/−1.40 <0.01
Perineal Pain Visual Analog Scale 0.13+/− 0.86 0.31+/− 1.4 0.21
Author Manuscript

Perineal pain now; None (PPI=0) 93.4% 90.4% 0.51

Pelvic Floor Anatomy and Muscle Function
Total vaginal length (cm) 7.4+/− 1.4 7.3+/− 1.5 0.68
Perineal Body Length (cm) 3.3+/− 0.8 3.3 +/− 0.8 0.44
Genital Hiatus at rest (cm) 2.7+/− 0.7 2.8+/−0.7 0.33
Genital Hiatus with strain (cm) 3.3+/−0.8 3.4+/−0.8 0.48
IAS not intact on transperineal ultrasound 7.0 % 15.1% 0.04
(N=291)
External anal sphincter not intact on 0.0% 1.90% 0.13
transperineal ultrasound (N=289)
Kegel strength (none/weak) 44.3% 52.3% 0.20
Rectal resting tone (none/weak) 3.7% 10.4% 0.07
Rectal squeeze present 41.9% 42.1% 1.0
Author Manuscript

Paper towel test ( (wet) 20% 14.4% 0.28

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 0.87 *
0 13.7% 15.3%
1 66.4% 62.1%
2 19.5% 22.2%

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 15

Outcome measure Intact/ Perineal trauma P value

Minor (≥ 2nd degree
laceration laceration)
Author Manuscript

N=217 N=118
% or Mean+−SD % or Mean+−SD
3 0.5% 0.0 %
Pelvic Organ prolapse impact score among 5.0+/− 14.7 1.1+/−3.4 0.11
women with Stage 2 or greater pelvic organ
prolapse (N=76)

ISI: Incontinence Severity Index; PPI: Present pain Intensity IAS: Internal Anal Sphincter.
*
Jonckheere-Terpstra test
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 16

Table 3

Deep Perineal Trauma and Pelvic Floor Outcomes, University of New Mexico, 2006-2011
Author Manuscript

Outcome measure Intact or Deep P value

non-deep perineal
trauma trauma
N=245 N=61
% or (>2cm into
mean+/−SD perineal
body)% or
mean+/−SD

Anal and Urinary Incontinence

Any anal incontinence (Wexner≥1) 46.7% 59.3% 0.11
Fecal incontinence, positive response on 7.9% 8.5% 0.80
Wexner
Wexner scores among those with any anal 1.8+/− 1.75 2.4+/− 2.0 0.01
incontinence Fecal Incont Index
Any urinary incontinence (ISI>0) 45.6% 45.0% 1.0
Author Manuscript

Incontinence Severity Index among those 1.7+/− 1.0 1.8+/− 1.3 0.80
with any urinary incontinence on ISI
Sexual Function and Perineal Pain
Sexual variables on Female Sexual
Function Index
Sexually active 87.9% 90.2% 0.83
Female Sexual Function Index scores 29.1+/−5.1 27.1+/−6.0 0.04
Individual Responses on Female Sexual
Function Index
Desire 3.9+/11.26 3.6+/1.20 0.07
Arousal 4.3+/−1.79 3.7+/−1.77 0.03
Lubrication 4.6+/1.9 4.2+/−2.1 0.21
Orgasm 4.3+/−1.9 4.0+/−2.1 0.32
Author Manuscript

Satisfaction 4.8+/−1.4 4.2+/−1.4 <0.01

Pain 5.2+/−1.0 4.6+/−1.6 0.01
Perineal Pain Now- Visual Analog Scale 0.12+/−0.8 0.38+/−1.4 0.19
Perineal Pain now none (PPI=0) 93.8% 84.5% 0.03
Pelvic Floor Anatomy and Muscle
Function
Mean total vaginal length (cm) 7.4 7.0 0.13
Perineal Body Length (cm) 3.3+/−0.8 3.5+/−0.8 0.16
Genital Hiatus at rest (cm) 2.7+/−0.7 2.7+/−07 0.53
Genital Hiatus with strain (cm) 3.3+/−0.8 3.30+/−0.74 0.84
Internal anal sphincter not intact on 8.5% 14.6% 0.20
transperineal ultrasound (N=266)
External anal sphincter not intact on 0.0% 1.9% 0.20
Author Manuscript

transperineal ultrasound (N=264)

Kegel strength (none/weak vs.mod/strong) 44.3% 61.0% 0.03
Rectal resting tone (none/weak vs. mod 4.6% 9.8% 0.25
strong)
Rectal squeeze 41.8% 48.8% 0.48

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.

 Lawrence et al. Page 17

Outcome measure Intact or Deep P value

non-deep perineal
trauma trauma
Author Manuscript

N=245 N=61
% or (>2cm into
mean+/−SD perineal
body)% or
mean+/−SD
Paper towel test (%wet) 19.9% 13.8% 0.35
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 0.43 *
0 14.4% 11.9%
1 66.2% 65.4%
2 19.0% 23.7%
3 0.4% 0.0%
Pelvic Floor impact Scores among all 2.2+/−9.4 2.0+/−5.5 0.83
women
Pelvic Floor impact score among women 4.6+/−14.0 2.0+/−4.5 0.31
with Stage 2 or greater pelvic organ
Author Manuscript

prolapse

ISI: Incontinence Severity Index; PPI: Present pain Intensity.

*
Jonckheere-Terpstra test
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Birth. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.