Indonesia Makalah
Indonesia Makalah
Indonesia Makalah
In 2019 our country entered in politics year, in the sense of an election year both
legislative and presidential elections. Although the new next year is the year of
politics, but politics warm atmosphere is very felt at this time. politics, according to
Indonesian dictionary, politics is all matters and actions (policy, strategy) of the state
government or any other country; how to act (in the face or deal with a problem).
According to the Encyclopedia of Indonesia, politics are matters relating to
governance, institutions and political processes. pressure groups, international
relations and governance.At present, our country is plagued with political issues that
make people split into several parts. There are furiously supports the A, there are
furiously supports the B. there are desperately hated the A, there are furiously
resented B, and some that remain silent or neutral.
Well, after following a course of public opinion a few weeks of this, a little
change my perspective on political issues in Indonesia. An example is the president
Joko Widodo who now heads. Many people scoffed pack habits Jokowi "slang" and
"eccentric" because they think that the pack Jokowi indifferent to the state. Some
people say that what is done that Jokowi imaging. There are some people who could
be called The Obtinate Audience, namely individuals who have a strong belief and
understanding of something that can not be changed through any communication
process. For example, even if Jokowi doing as good as any, they will still think that
what was done was just imaging Jokowi.
There are also some people who could be called Spiral of silence. Ie silence from
the public due to the impact of the agenda-setting and cowardice have different
opinions for fear of being left out. For example, someone in the place of work are
people who are proud to Jokowi, but he did not dare to express it or show it to others
in the work environment because most of them do not like the way things Jokowi.
From this I learned, at will any or as much as I against a figure and object, I still
have to accept the opinions of others that are different from mine. Instead of
becoming angry and hate people who incidentally opinions differ from mine. Because
this is what makes the split in Indonesian society, not what we like, but how we
respond to other people's opinions and perceptions. After all, respect the opinions of
others is not difficult, right?
How do we analyze and accept the political message is also important to address
the political issues at this time. We also have to accept the things that we think are not
true. Although we think it is not right, try to accept it while looking for the facts.
This political polarization has given rise to concerns of various parties. Public
response that the political elite and their supporters can move on, forget about the 01
camps and 02 camps but united into precepts 3 "Unity of Indonesia" then surfaced as
a discourse of reconciliation. From the discourse of reconciliation developing,
emerging two main discourse.
First, reconciliation among the political elite after the presidential leadership is
needed to lower the political temperature is not just sharing office. According to the
Secretary General of the PDI-P, Hasto Kristiyanto, it looks for reconciliation with the
opposing parties during the Presidential Election 2019. However, reconciliation is not
through the distribution of positions in the executive.
Second, the discourse that reconciliation must complete the presidential form of
polarization effects in the community. For Islamic organizations such as
Muhammadiyah and NU, needed social reconciliation in which all parties can be
reunited, because Indonesia is more important than anything. Meanwhile, according
to UI sociologist Thamrin Amalgola, there should be a substantive reconciliation at
the level of the nation, which is not only limited to the distribution of cabinet
positions.
Commitment to keep the unity of the nation is a constitutional mandate and the
mandate of the of the third principle of Pancasila "Unity of Indonesia". A threat to the
unity of the nation means a threat to the Pancasila and the Constitution of the country.
National unity, to borrow a phrase Bung Hatta should not be a "per-sate-an."
Unity is a house that is always open to working together to advance the nation.
National unity is the basis for the future of Indonesia in order to compete with other
nations. No country has developed and prosperous if its people are divided.
CHAPTER III
PEOPLE’S POLITICAL VIEW
Indonesia has no official state religion but more than 80% of its people are
Muslim. It is the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.Conservative
religious groups have become increasingly vocal over recent years - rallying over
cases like the blasphemy conviction of former Jakarta governor (and Jokowi ally)
Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, known as Ahok.So the main presidential candidates have
been working hard to display their Islamic credentials.
He has picked as his running mate a young, savvy, politician called Sandiaga
Uno, who also happens to be one of Indonesia's richest men.Analysts are predicting a
significant number of voters will decide not to vote at all this year, feeling
disillusioned with Mr Jokowi but unwilling to back the overt Islamist politics of Mr
Prabowo.
Mafindo, an Indonesian organisation fighting fake news, said political fake news
and disinformation shot up by 61% between December 2018 and January 2019.The
group's co-founder told Reuters that a large proportion of the misinformation targets
Mr Jokowi, making him out to be a Christian, of Chinese ancestry, or a
communist.These may not sound like dramatic claims - but they're big accusations in
Muslim-majority Indonesia, where race and ideology are especially sensitive issues.
Political conditions are important for those who seek to invest or engage in
business relations with Indonesia. In this section we present an overview of
Indonesia's current political composition as well as overviews of the key chapters in
the country's political history.