Data Privacy Act - Bar Exam Guide
Data Privacy Act - Bar Exam Guide
Data Privacy Act - Bar Exam Guide
Data Privacy Act is now covered under Mercantile Law for the
2019 Bar Examinations – http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/baradmission/2019/MERCANTILE-
LAW.pdf
The coverage for the Data Privacy Act is as follows (based on unofficial sources):
Some important Data Privacy topics, of which we already discussed (linked below) under
the Data Privacy Act and Privacy Law in general which are not covered but are important to
know:
1. Constitutional and Statutory Basis for the Right to Privacy under Philippine Law
(except the Data Privacy Act)
2. The Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test (Pollo vs Constantino-David G.R.
181881, Oct. 18, 2011)
3. The Data Protection Officer – Roles, Responsibilities and Rights
4. Data Controller, Data Processor and Data Subjects (Tripartite privacy relationship)
5. Legal Basis for Processing of Personal Information
6. Cybercrime Warrants
7. Privacy Torts
8. Writ of Habeas Data
9. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties and Letters Rogatory (for Public International Law)
Today we’re going to discuss about the coverage for the Data Privacy Act specifically for
the 2019 Bar Examinations.
Constitutional Basis
Under the most recent 1987 Philippine Constitution, the Right to Information and
Communications Privacy is recognized under Article III, Sec. 3(1), which states:
Refers to any information whether recorded in a material form or not, from which
the identity of an individual is apparent or can be reasonably and directly
ascertained by the entity holding the information, or when put together with other
information would directly and certainly identify an individual.
Basically personal information is anything that can identify an individual.
Examples are your name, ID number, online usernames, email address, phone number,
stage names, etc.
Personal information may also be pieces of information, when aggregated with other
information can reasonably identify an individual based on substantial evidence in which a
prudent person may reasonably believe that such information can be identifiable to a unique
individual.
Sample Question: Juan Dela Cruz, a Filipino citizen, filled up a survey form. Such survey
form only asked about his favorite coffee flavors and how much he spends per week for
coffee. The survey also asked for his first name. Is the survey collecting personal
information?
Answer: No. First name by itself cannot reasonably identify an individual. Juan cannot be
identified from other persons named “Juan”. Neither does information about his favorite
coffee flavors and how much he spends for coffee even if taken together with his first name
cannot be said to reasonably identify Juan.
However, if the survey asked for his full name, even if there are more than one (1) Juan
Dela Cruz in the Philippines, it is still considered as collecting personal information.
(1) About an individual’s race, ethnic origin, marital status, age, color, and
religious, philosophical or political affiliations;
Example, health information such as medical diagnosis or prognosis by itself is not sensitive
personal information unless there is a Patient ID or name of the patient together with the
health information that be used to trace back to an individual.
BIR, SSS, GSIS, PhilHealth and other government records are also classified as Sensitive
Personal Information.
The confusion of most people is how to distinguish “sensitive personal information” versus
“sensitive information” or “confidential information”.
Sensitive Personal Information (SPI) is enumerated by law, under Sec. 3(l) of the Data
Privacy Act. SPIs can be traced back to individuals.
Sensitive Information is any information that may cause harm or prejudice when disclosed
to an individual or the general public. This is not protected under the Data Privacy Act.
Examples are trade secrets and business related information such as business records
which does not contain any personal information. It can also be government information
such as classified documents and national security related information.
Confidential information is specifically provided by law under the Rules of Court (such as
doctor-patient or attorney-client privilege) or statute (such as arbitration proceedings and
awards under the Domestic Arbitration Law). Generally the effect of confidentiality will result
to the information to being inadmissable in any court, in any proceeding.
Scope
Scope is discussed under Sec. 4 of the Data Privacy Act.
Requisites
Must involve any processing of personal information
By either natural or juridical persons
Either acting as a controller or processor
Whether or not found in the Philippines that uses equipment or maintains an office,
branch or agency in the Philippines.