Community Statement 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

DENNISON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 1

Community Statement

There are many opportunities for communication between parents and

teachers throughout the year. Both casual and scheduled conferences are equally

important. This artifact shows the preparation and effectiveness of student-led

conferences in a 5th grade classroom.

Jordan, Reyes-Blanes, Peel, Peel, and Lane (1998) offer some basic guidelines

to enhance teacher-parent conferences. These conferences can be approached as a

meeting between colleagues. We need to work as a team to decide behavioral and

academic expectations. This is also a good time to explain to parents what data we

use to assess students and explain any jargon they might have encountered but not

yet understand. As the name suggests, most of the time these conferences are

centered around the student but they rarely involve the student. Lusse, Notten, and

Engbersen (2019) suggest that students are the key to bridging any gaps between

educators and family. Students are familiar with both the culture at home and at

school.

In my involvement with parent-teacher conferences, I had my first

opportunity to prepare and participate in student-led conferences. Artifacts of work

were saved and students chose their best work to showcase. Each project came with

the rubric used to score it so students could show their parents how they performed

and how they planned to improve in the future. Hiatt-Michael (2004) found that

students were more focused and successful when they were personally presenting

their work to their parents. Hiatt-Michael also reported an increase in revision of

work, goal-setting, more time spent on projects, and overall increase in interest of
DENNISON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 2

school work. Watching students choose which artifacts of work to show their

parents allowed me to see the pride they took in their ability to showcase their

growth and knowledge. In a few instances, students asked to revise their work

because they thought they could do better than what they had to choose from in

their stash of artifacts. I witnessed students answer for their work in a non-

judgmental way. If they performed well, the conversation went to all the positive

strategies they used to achieve their results and what they could continue to work

on to show improvement. If students did not do well, the conversation included

what they did do well, what goals the student would like to achieve, and what

supports could be offered to help them achieve their goals. In one of the conferences

I witnessed, the student did not have great scores but had shown improvement

since his last conference and was proud of his accomplishments, as he should be!

Educators can learn so much from parents. Parents might know about

bullying that has gone unnoticed in the classroom or after-school activities that

highlight the focus of the student and their family (Ediger, 2016). It is good for

educators to hear how students are developing at home, as well as parents hearing

how students are progressing at school. If parents are open to it, we can encourage

them to offer pedagogical support and educational support. When parents have

confidence in their child and encourage them with discipline and warmth, it is

pedagogical support. Educational support is the spirit of expectation parents have

towards their child’s school performance. These two supports are far more effective

than when parents focus on poor grades or unfinished homework (Lusse, Notten, &

Engbersen, 2019). One of the conferences I witnessed was with both parents
DENNISON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 3

without the student. They opened up about not knowing how else to support their

struggling child. The struggle the student was facing was with her attitude toward

school more than her abilities. Her work was incomplete, not low quality. Offering

thoughts about pedagogical and educational support would have been helpful with

this student.

The most surprising aspect of student-led conferences was the amount of

preparation required. In my experience, the host teacher created a filing system for

key assignments that lined up with the teaching standards. These assignments were

stapled to the rubrics used for the assignment. The week leading up to conferences,

students helped pick from their personal assignments to showcase their skills to

their parents. They spent time looking at their work and choosing their academic

goals so they would be prepared for the conference. I helped with organizing

students’ folders of work and prepping for the flow of the continual conferences.

Desks were arranged so that there was room for a whole family to sit at the tables

where students would present their work. The part of the preparation that I missed

out on and had not thought about was training the students to lead their

conferences and choose artifacts of work that best represented their abilities. Borba

and Olvera (2001) have organized the process of preparing for student-led

conferences in six stages: students setting up one binder with dividers for all

academic subjects, students write a self-reflection for their progress in each subject,

students compile four completed pieces of work to showcase in binder for each

subject, teachers train students to lead their own conference, conference night, and

finally, an invitation to parents to write a letter to their child reflecting on their


DENNISON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 4

experience with the student-led conference and share any personal feelings. The

process I experience did not line up with their six stages exactly but it was similar.

They make the observation that students are less nervous about conferences

because there are few surprises due to their involvement.

I like the practice of not surprising anyone at conferences. With casual

conferences using notes home and phone calls, parents should be well aware of the

level of their child’s classroom success. With the use of rubrics, clear expectations

for student work are explicitly stated. Student-led conferences allow students the

opportunity to be proud of their progress and hard work.


DENNISON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 5

References

Borba, J. A. & Olvera, C. M. (2001). Student-led parent-teacher conferences. Clearing

House, 74(6), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650109599220

Ediger, M. (2016). Quality parent teacher conferences. College Student Journal, 50(4),

614–616. Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=12024539

6&login.asp&site=ehost-live

Hiatt-Michael, D. (2004). Student-led parent conferences in middle schools. School

Community Journal, 14(1), 59–80. Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=50790116

7&login.asp&site=ehost-live

Jordan, L., Reyes-Blanes, A. E., Peel, B. B., Peel, H. A., & Lane, H. B. (1998). Developing

teacher-parent partnerships across cultures: Effective parent conferences.

Intervention in School & Clinic, 33, 141–147.

https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129803300302

Lusse, M., Notten, T., & Engbersen, G. (2019). School-family partnership procedures

in urban secondary education, part A: Strengths and limitations. School

Community Journal, 29(1), 201–226. Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=13719670

5&login.asp&site=ehost-live

You might also like