Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 256 views

    Presumptive Death

    Uploaded by

    onlineonrandomdays
    The Supreme Court has ruled that a petition solely to declare someone presumptively dead is not a valid lawsuit. However, families of missing soldiers can still claim death benefits without a court declaration of presumptive death. The Philippine Veterans Affairs Office or Armed Forces of the Philippines can determine eligibility for benefits by evaluating evidence that the missing criteria under the Civil Code for presuming death has been met. Claimants denied benefits can appeal to the Office of the President and then the Court of Appeals if needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Presumptive Death

    Uploaded by

    onlineonrandomdays
    256 views2 pages
    The Supreme Court has ruled that a petition solely to declare someone presumptively dead is not a valid lawsuit. However, families of missing soldiers can still claim death benefits without a court declaration of presumptive death. The Philippine Veterans Affairs Office or Armed Forces of the Philippines can determine eligibility for benefits by evaluating evidence that the missing criteria under the Civil Code for presuming death has been met. Claimants denied benefits can appeal to the Office of the President and then the Court of Appeals if needed.

    Original Description:

    Presumptive death

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court has ruled that a petition solely to declare someone presumptively dead is not a valid lawsuit. However, families of missing soldiers can still claim death benefits without a court declaration of presumptive death. The Philippine Veterans Affairs Office or Armed Forces of the Philippines can determine eligibility for benefits by evaluating evidence that the missing criteria under the Civil Code for presuming death has been met. Claimants denied benefits can appeal to the Office of the President and then the Court of Appeals if needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    256 views2 pages

    Presumptive Death

    Uploaded by

    onlineonrandomdays
    The Supreme Court has ruled that a petition solely to declare someone presumptively dead is not a valid lawsuit. However, families of missing soldiers can still claim death benefits without a court declaration of presumptive death. The Philippine Veterans Affairs Office or Armed Forces of the Philippines can determine eligibility for benefits by evaluating evidence that the missing criteria under the Civil Code for presuming death has been met. Claimants denied benefits can appeal to the Office of the President and then the Court of Appeals if needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Presumptive death and claim for death benefits of Filipino soldiers

    A soldier’s life is one fraught with danger, uncertainty, and sacrifices. Fortunate are those who
    return after a mission while others are welcomed by their loved ones in coffins and draped
    Philippine flags.

    Worst are those who have not returned from their mission and their whereabouts unknown.
    Absent their bodies and any information on their whereabouts, these soldiers’ families file
    death benefit claims with the appropriate offices but are declined. In the past, these families
    file petitions for presumptive deaths of their loved ones. But, this is already a thing of the past.

    The Supreme Court, in the case of Tadeo-Matias v. Republic of the Philippines (G.R. No. 230751,
    April 15, 2018), has ruled that a petition whose sole objective is to have a person declared
    presumptively dead under the Civil Code is not regarded as a valid suit and no court has any
    authority to take cognizance of the same. This is because the rules on presumptive death
    enshrined under Articles 390 and 391 of the Civil Code merely express rules of evidence. In
    other words, a petition for declaration of presumptive death under Article 390 or 391 of the
    Civil Code is not a valid action in this jurisdiction.

    Thus, the Supreme Court has outlined the rules in order that the family members may claim the
    death benefits of a soldier who set out for service but never came back.

    First, the Philippine Veterans Affairs Office (PVAO) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines
    (AFP) can decide claims of death benefits of a missing soldier without requiring the claimant to
    first produce a court declaration of the presumptive death of such soldiers. In fact, in such
    claims, the PVAO and the AFP can make their own determination on the basis of evidence
    presented by the claimant, whether the presumption of death under Articles 390 and 391 of
    the Civil Code may be applied or not.

    Since the presumption of death arises by operation of law and in order to avail of the
    presumption, the claimant need only present before the PVAO or the appropriate office of the
    AFP, as the case may be, any evidence which shows that the concerned soldier had been
    missing for such number of years and/or under the circumstances prescribed under the Civil
    Code.

    Second, it is the PVAO or the AFP which will determine the sufficiency of the evidence
    submitted by the claimant to establish the requisite factual conditions specified under Articles
    390 or 391 of the Civil Code in order for the presumption of death to arise.

    Third, if the PVAO or the AFP determines that the evidence submitted by the claimant is not
    sufficient to invoke the presumption of death under the Civil Code and denies the latter’s claim
    by reason thereof, the claimant may file an appeal with the Office of the President.
    Finally, if the Office of the President denies the appeal, the claimant may next seek recourse via
    a petition for review with the Court of Appeals under Rule 43 of the Rules of Court. Should such
    recourse still fail, the claimant may file an appeal by certiorari with the Supreme Court.

    You might also like