VDGD
VDGD
VDGD
CHALLENGES IN HRD
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Need for Human Resource Development
1.3 Importance of HRD
1.4 Increasing role of HR Manager in Recent Times
1.5 Challenges to HRM/HRD Manager
1.6 Emerging issues in HRD
1.7 Emerging Trends in HRD
1.8 Challenges for HRD
1.9 HRD and the Challenge of Developing Leaders for Tomorrow
1.10 Summary
1.11 Keywords
1.12 Self Assessment Questions
1.13 References/ Suggested Readings
1.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this lesson, you will be able to:
Understand the concept, need and importance of HRD.
Describe the increasing role of and challenges to HRD managers.
Explain the emerging issues and trends in HRD.
Explain the challenges for HRD and developing leaders for tomorrow.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
With increasing global competition, it has become difficult for organizations to
start, survive, grow, stabilize and excel their performance in business. They are
under tremendous pressure to improve their performance quantitatively and
qualitatively with cost effectiveness. The business environment is rapidly
changing. It has become necessity to keep pace with the changing environment
otherwise they will be thrown out of business by market forces. The challenges
faced by business organization are how to improve profitability, tune products and
services as per changing need of customers and organizational development to stay
in competitive race of business. Now the tasks of farming rules, regulations and
standing orders have been changed to promote the motivation generating factors
and minimize the de-motivating factor for maximum capacity utilization. All these
activities were clubbed together under umbrella of human resource development.
Though Human resource development is not new in developed nations, it is
relatively neglected in the developing nation. Managers Supervisors and
employees all require training and continual development if their potential is to be
utilized effectively, to be able to catch up with the ongoing competition.
In the opinion of Nadler and Wigs the ultimate purpose of HRD activities is ―to
make a difference‖ in the real world of costs, quality, quantity, accuracy and
timeliness.
It has been rightly observed by Billimoria and Singh that ―each human being is
born as something new, something that never existed before. Each is born with the
capacity to win in his life, has his own unique potentials, capabilities and
limitations.‖
The need for HRD is felt by every organization that is interested in the following
objectives to be achieved:
The departments are formed not on the basis of functional specialization but
on the basis of products and services. HRD has made these structural
changes possible.
In present time it has become a need of the business to provide goods and
services with lower cost. This compelled many companies to outsource their
non-core activities. They are forming a larger portion of working force and
they can work at distance with flexible time. This contributes to cut down in
house costs. Hence the need for training and development of such workers
has been felt at micro and macro levels. Through proper training and
development activities these worker can contribute to a good extent in cost
reduction in operation.
Organization where favorable climate for learning is create and facilities for
training and development, Career development and proper guidance are
provided the employees take initiative to learn more.
(a) Globalisation.
(b) Enactment of new or amendment of existing labour legislations.
(c) Development of knowledge of employees and research activities relating to
human resource.
(d) Shortage of trained HRD managers at senior level to provide on job
training.
(e) Rapidly changing technology creating skill gap among employees.
(f) Changing role of trade unions in present time.
(g) Increasing expectation of employees from organization.
(h) Competitive demands of employees.
(i) Educational at national and regional level are not in a position to meet the
requirements of industries.
The above mentioned reasons increased importance of Human Resource
Management in present time. Further, to carry out business in different
countries the need for HRM has been felt strongly. Because of employees from
diversified culture, sex, highly skilled employees, different labour laws in
different countries, enlightened labour union and leaders, high expectation of
employees and competitive demands, management is not in position to do
justice to the job.
Structure
2.1Objectives
2.2 Introduction
21.3 Characteristics of HRD
2.4 Purpose of HRD audit
2.5Components of HRD audit
2.5 Steps of HRD audit
21.7 Techniques to conduct HRD audit
21.8 HRD audit report
2.9 HRD audit scorecard
2.10 Summary
2.11 Key words
2.12Self-assessment questions
2.13 References/Suggested readings
2.1 Objectives
After going through this lesson you will be able to
o Understand and explain the concept of HRD audit and HR audit
o Understand the characteristics of HRD audit
o Understand the purpose of HRD audit
o Describe the components of HRD audit
o List the steps inculcated in the HRD audit
o Enumerate the techniques used to conduct HRD audit
o Explain how to generate HRD audit report and HRD scorecard
2.2 Introduction
HRD is defined as – “A process by which the employees of an organisation are helped, in a
continuous, planned way, to acquire or sharpen capabilities required to perform various
functions associated with their present or expected future roles; develop their general
capabilities as individuals and discover and exploit their own inner potential for their own/ and
or organisational development purposes; develop an organisational culture in which the
supervisor-subordinate relationships, teamwork, and collaboration among sub-units are strong
and contribute to the professional well-being, motivation and pride of employees.” – (Rao, 1985)
The objective of HRD is to build the competencies and culture required for individual, social and
organisational growth to create a better society for all. HR practices are essential for bringing
about the success of any organisation. Any practice in a firm which deals with building and
development of competencies, commitment and culture in the firm is termed as a HR practice.
Therefore, human resource development is all about effective management of these HR
practices, and is therefore cantered on three Cs – Competency, Commitment and Culture. Good
HR practices are critical for overall organisational growth. Review of leading companies in India
(Rao 2010) clearly demonstrates that these firms have a massive HRD function, a deep
orientation towards HRD function and sufficient investment in HRD function to gain competitive
edge. Therefore, questions present that, are the HR practices good enough to provide the edge,
are they relevant to organisational strategy, do they orchestrate the organisational climate and
most of all, are these HR practices converting into organisational performance? Answers to such
questions are provided by HRD audit. HRD audit is defined as –
“The methodology of evaluating various elements of HRD and providing a balance sheet of the
strengths and weaknesses of HRD practices in the organisation.” – (Rao, 1990)
This audit provides answers to such questions not just intermittently, but on a continuous basis as
well. It is important to understand here that HR (human resource) function of the organisation
encompasses this HRD function and in addition contains HR administration and Industrial
relations and worker affairs. The HRD audit therefore, doesn‘t cover HR administration and
Industrial relation aspects, but it cannot even work in isolation, so they are considered to play the
role of contextual factors. The scope of HRD audit therefore is limited to evaluation of growth
opportunities and functions of people, and doesn‘t include evaluation of any HR function like
industrial relations, worker welfare and management and so on. A HR audit is defined as –
(SHRM, 2016)
―An evaluation of the organization's operational HR policies, practices and processes
with a focus on key HR department delivery areas (e.g., recruiting—both internal and
external, employee retention, compensation, employee benefits, performance
management, employee relations, training and development).
A review of current HR indicators (e.g., number of unfilled positions, the time it takes to
fill new position, turnover, employee satisfaction, internal grievances filed, number of
legal complaints, absenteeism rates).‖
Therefore, while HR audit ensure whether the HR practices of an organisation are effective,
adequate and legal, HRD audit focuses in evaluation of HR practices in the firm meant for
employee development. It can be viewed as a function specific HR audit. HRD audit involves
comprehensive evaluation of current strategies, structure, systems, and skills in the direction of
accomplishment of overall business strategy and long term and short term goals of the firm. In
this context, the audit also ascertains which the future HRD needs of the company are after
assessing current HRD activities and inputs.
HRD Structure
The structure of HR function in any organisation acts as a facilitator for HRD. HR structures can
change over time and organisations periodically review their functions to sustain business
growth. Some of the different structures HR function can take have been listed below:
Dedicated HR department – where each sub function of HR is assigned different staff and
different tasks. Such departments are fairly large and in large organisations, the number
of HR departments may be in hundreds.
Corporate HRD with headquarter office and separate independent departments in
different regions or locations
Outsourced HR function – with a HR executive and lean staff managing HR function in
the firm
HRD task force – group of competent line managers perform HR functions and one of
them is assigned the role of HR head
CEO as HRD manager – in relatively smaller organisations, CEO himself can assume the
responsibility of HR function
When organisation conducts HRD audit for structure component, the following questions need to
be answered:
1. What kind of structure is required by the company?
The important issue to be addressed is - Given the current and future business
needs of the company, which HR systems are required? And for each of these systems,
which structure would act as the best facilitator? Does the organisation presently have the
required structure to meet those needs?
In addition, firms should also keep in mind while evaluating existing structures,
that (1) value addition from existing departments would not always come from self-
multiplication of departments, (2) HRD should not be merely system-driven but also
competency and business driven, and (3) HRD can be strengthened even in the absence
of formal HRD department.
2. Do HRD activities contribute directly or indirectly to business goals of the organisation,
and whether organisations prioritise activities in their contribution towards business
goals?
3. Does organisation have HRD competencies of required nature, quality and extent to
deliver the HRD functions and maintain their pace?
4. How is the HR department positioned? Does it have an appropriate top level executive to
facilitate its functioning?
5. Is the HR department head competent in delivering his duties at the position?
6. Is there clarity in definition of roles?
7. Do the tasks performed by HR department causing value addition?
8. Is the HR department staffed properly and task distribution appropriate?
In addition, the following questions need to be addressed by HRD structure audit:
Given the competency requirements, which is the appropriate structure?
How well defined is the existing structure (in terms of role, task structure, reporting,
coordination mechanisms, etc,)?
Which structures are most appropriate in fulfilment of business goals?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing HRD structure?
What are the most important elements of existing HRD structure?
What steps need to be taken to align HRD structure with business goals of company?
HRD Systems
For ensuring achievement of overall business strategy and HRD goals, following HRD systems
are utilised:
Training subsystem – is seen as the most significant part of HRD, and ensures that
technical, managerial and conceptual competencies of the employees are developed on a
continual basis
Performance appraisal subsystem – which is gradually being replaced by performance
management systems, which involve all tasks ranging from performance planning,
development, monitoring and recognition.
Feedback and counselling system – for mutual development of the employees. Currently,
the firms are moving towards integrating this function into their performance
management subsystem.
Career development and planning subsystem – involves creating awareness in the
individual about their capabilities and then steer them towards the right career path.
Potential appraisal system – which recognise and build the desired competencies in the
individual to meet future growth requirements both at the organisational and individual
level
Auditing HRD systems involve distributing questionnaires to understand how the systems are
being implemented to achieve HRD and business strategy. In addition, it is imperative to
incorporate interviews, observation and formal discussion to understand actual system
functioning. Some possible areas to address during HRD audit of subsystems have been
presented below:
Career system
a. Manpower planning and recruitment – what is the current process, how managers
participate, is planning done scientifically, what are strengths and weakness of the
current system?
b. Potential appraisal and promotions – what is the system for potential appraisal, is
it scientific, what is the promotion policy, does it incorporate competency, what
are strengths and weakness of the current system?
c. Career planning and development – what is process of succession planning, are
career paths well defined, would structural changes impact career paths, what are
strengths and weakness of the current system?
Work planning
d. Role analysis – how role clarity is communicated and ensured to employees, are
there mechanisms to share performance expectations, what are strengths and
weakness of the current system?
e. Contextual analysis – are there mechanisms to share organisational performance
information, do employees use it to plan their tasks, what are strengths and
weakness of the current system?
f. Performance appraisal – what is the current system, what are its components and
objectives, are managers and employees appropriately involved, what are
strengths and weakness of the current system?
Development system
g. Training and learning – suggestions for improvement in training, mechanisms to
impart training
h. Feedback and counselling – mechanisms for feedback and counselling, adequacy
of resources for this, is there 360 degree mechanism
i. Others like job rotation, mentoring
Self-renewal system
j. Role efficacy – presence of role efficacy development programs, mechanism to
assess efficacy
k. Organisation development – how is OD diagnosis carried out, mechanisms or
interventions for OD?
l. Action oriented research
Culture systems
m. HRD climate – main characteristics, presence of OCTAPACE, level of trust
n. Values – are values clearly stated and communicated, relation of values to
organisational goals?
o. Quality orientation – efforts to improve quality, success of these efforts, quality
related systems in place
p. Reward and recognition – existing reward systems, their employee perception,
what are strengths and weakness of the current system
q. Information and communication – information needs at different employee levels,
appropriate flow of information, efforts to increase communication
r. Empowerment – practices to empower employees, attitude of management
towards empowerment
In addition, during HRD audit of systems, the following secondary data is also reviewed, each of
which aids in understanding better about HRD system:
Analysis of recruitment data – for manpower planning
Analysis of rate of promotion – potential appraisal
Analysis of past promotion patterns and career patterns – career planning
Analysis of performance appraisal forms, KSAs, and clarity in roles – role analysis
Analysis of information shared by management with employees – contextual analysis
Analysis of training expenditure, budget
Analysis of time spent of performance counselling and facilitating factors for the same
Analysis of job rotation data and past workshops or seminars conducted for role efficacy
Analysis of research reports, OD intervention documents and organisation circulars
Analysis of meetings, memos, interviews, values, statements and commitments, notice
boards, annual reports etc.
HRD Competencies
Present business challenges require that HRM be professional in nature. A core set of
requirements for HRM to be professional are – sharing of knowledge, competency building, role
clarity, and focus on defined outcomes. All of this requires that HR staff is competent to perform
their roles adequately and aid the business to meet challenges. For this competencies are
important component of HRD audit. The following competencies are required by HR
professionals in today‘s business environment:
HRD professional knowledge – including knowledge of HRD philosophy and practices,
performance appraisal and potential appraisal systems, career planning and development
systems, group dynamics, training and OD interventions, inter-linkage between HRD
systems and components, development systems, career systems, culture systems and self-
renewal systems in detail
HRD professional skills – includes skills required for influence building, oral and written
communication skills, interpersonal skills, counselling skills, leadership skills, creativity
and problem solving skills, system design skills, OD skills, conflict management skills
Personal attitude and values – empathy and understanding, introspection, interpersonal
trust, proactivity, sense of fairness and discipline, openness, responsibility, humble,
perseverance, empowerment, and motivation
The HRD audit for competencies can be done using one of these methods:
1. Knowledge testing – can be done using standard techniques such as post training tests
2. Testing attitude and values – can be done using standard instruments available to gauge
attitude and values
3. Self assessment – can be done on a checklist supplied by HRD department to assess
competency gap in HRD professionals
4. 360 degree appraisals – by involving peers, subordinates, bosses, external and internal
entities
5. Internal customer satisfaction surveys and employee surveys to assess HRD department
6. Assessment centres
Questionnaires
The audit questionnaire is meant for line managers and operational staff generally. It is one of
the most comprehensive techniques of auditing. It involves items to assess the dimensions of all
components of HRD audit such as evaluation of career system and sub-parts, work planning
systems, development systems, self-renewal systems and HRD systems and functions. The
questionnaire is analysed in the following manner:
Item-wise analysis – scoring each item and then computing average score per item.
Comparison of average scores industry and past data aids in benchmarking of the score
and then assessment of performance of the firm on that dimension
Dimension wise analysis – when each dimension‘s total score is computed by
aggregating individual item scores belonging to that dimension, a dimension score can be
obtained
Overall HRD score – by aggregating dimension wise scores and indicated general HRD
effectiveness in the company
Those dimensions which score less than benchmarked values are considered as liabilities while
others are assets. In addition, if questionnaire data contains open-ended questions, it can be
analysed for contents and tabulations.
2.10 Summary
The chapter begins by discussion of the concept of HRD, need for HRD audit, and then defines
HRD audit and how it differs from HR audit. The characteristics and purpose of HRD audit in
business decision making has also been explained. HRD audit involves auditing five major
aspects or dimensions – HRD strategy, HRD styles and culture, HRD structures, HRD systems,
and HRD competencies. A detail discussion of each component and what to include in audit has
been presented. The general steps taken to conduct HRD audit in an organisation have been
enumerated. Three major techniques used to conduct HRD audit viz. interviews, observation and
questionnaires; and the areas they should assess have also been presented in the chapter. The
chapter concludes with presentation on HRD audit report and HRD scorecard, each of which is a
major outcome of HRD audit process carried in the firm.
2.11 Keywords
HRD audit - The methodology of evaluating various elements of HRD and providing a
balance sheet of the strengths and weaknesses of HRD practices in the organisation.
HR audit - An evaluation of the organization's operational HR policies, practices and
processes with a focus on key HR department delivery areas (e.g., recruiting—both
internal and external, employee retention, compensation, employee benefits, performance
management, employee relations, training and development).
HRD strategies – involves mainly the strategies for Communication; Accountability,
ownership and commitment; Quality; Customer orientation; Cost reduction, and Culture
building
OCTAPACE culture – involves defining culture on the dimensions of Openness,
Collaboration, Trust and Trustworthiness, Authenticity, Proaction, Autonomy,
Confrontation, and Experimentation
HRD structure – defines the setup of HR function in any organisation which acts as a
facilitator for HRD strategy
HRD subsystems – typically include the system for training, performance appraisal,
feedback and counselling, career development and planning, potential appraisal, self-
renewal, and culture systems
HRD competencies – include the competencies required by HRD professionals and
include professional knowledge, professional skills and personal attitude and values
HRD audit instruments – Key instruments used are Interviews, Observations and
Questionnaires
HRD audit report – which is not a research report, rather it is meant to suggest areas of
improvement, identified through HRD audit, in light of its assessment of HRD functions
involvement in achieving business strategy
HRD scorecard – which measures the maturity level of HRD of any organisation by
taking into account the HRD system maturity, HRD competencies of employees, HRD
culture and HRD influence on business goals or linkages?
Structure
3.1Objectives
3.2 Introduction
3.3 Purpose of evaluation of the effectiveness of HRD programs
3.4 Models and frameworks for Evaluation
3.5 Measures used for evaluation
3.6 Building an organisational culture conducive for evaluation
3.7 Summary
3.8 Keywords
3.9 Self-assessment questions
3.10 References/Suggested Readings
3.1 Objectives
After going through this lesson you will be able to
o Define and explain the concept of evaluation of the effectiveness of HRD
programs
o Explain the stages in a typical HRD cycle and role of evaluation
o Understand and explain the purpose of evaluation of the effectiveness of HRD
programs
o Elucidate different models and frameworks used for evaluation of the
effectiveness of HRD programs
o List and explain the measures widely used for evaluation of the effectiveness of
HRD programs, by different models of evaluation
o List and explain organisational blockages and strategies to build an organisational
culture conducive for evaluation
o Explain the role of responsibilities, communication and active participation of all
stakeholders in HRD programs for effective evaluation to occur
3.2 Introduction
Human Resource Development (HRD) has roots in Human Resource Accounting theory and has
undergone considerable evolution to date. As such the existing body of studies on HRD has
categorised this evolution into three models – ‗Hard variant' of HRD which implies human
resources need to be treated like other physical resources, that is, obtained cheaply and used to
the maximum; ‗Soft variant' of HRD which lays emphasis on mutual growth of firm and its
human resources, and the present ‗5-P model', which emphasises that HRM and HRD are an
integral part of business strategy and requires development of the 5Ps of HRD - policies,
practices, programmes, philosophy and processes – in line with the overall business strategy.
HRD has gained enormous significance owing to fundamental changes in business such as
dynamic business environment, increasing complexity of organisational boundaries,
multinational operation and rising competition to name a few. Amidst these changes, it is
recognised that the single most important resource for competitive advantage is the human
resource of a firm since when they are effectively developed, they generate tacit organisational
knowledge facilitating the firm to gain sustained competitive advantage.
Although it is recognised that HRD provides sustained competitive advantage, most firms do not
demonstrate whether HRD programs have yielded the desired benefits or not. Firms opine that it
is unnecessary to evaluate HRD programs since evaluation is a time intensive and costly process.
However, it is imperative to carry out the evaluation of effectiveness, since firms who invest in
HRD programs have already made a considerable investment in terms of time and money, and
therefore need a way to exhibit the value created from the investment and return on investment
generated.
A typical HRD cycle has the following phases (Figure 1): Needs identification, Program design,
Program delivery and Program evaluation. In any firm, first, a gap analysis is conducted to
determine the difference between existing HRD capacity of a firm and proposed HRD capacity
in light of overall business strategy. Then this difference determines HRD needs and based on
these needs identification, different HRD programmes are designed and delivered to fill the gap.
Clearly, there is a strong relationship between the first three stages of the HRD cycle and the
final stage, which is the evaluation of HRD programmes. Evaluation is a vital step in the HRD
cycle since the output of an evaluation program determines inputs for future learning needs and
hence the required HRD programmes. It is also important to state here that evaluation is not a
onetime process; rather it is a continuous process integral to HRD cycle, implying that it should
occur before, on and after each HRD program delivered in the firm.
Identifying
learning
needs
Designing
Evaluating
HRD
HRD
programmes
prgrammes
Delivering
HRD
programmes
To evaluate the effectiveness of an HRD program, the firm establishes the following:
Establishing the output of evaluation – When and Who
This involves the firm in deciding when the evaluation should occur and who
should receive the outcomes of the evaluation, which basically aids in corporate decision
making. HRD department is interested in determining who is interested in the
information collected from the evaluation process since key participants attach varying
levels of importance to the output of evaluation. For example, the actual outcome data
would be of the highest interest to those who actually underwent the HRD program, and
these learners may be individuals, their colleagues and supervisors. The evaluation data
regarding the design of the program would of the highest interest for facilitators and
designers of the program. The data regarding ROI and fulfilment of program objectives
and gaps in organisational performance would of the highest interest for corporate
decision-makers who need to secure the required resources to design and deliver the
programs.
Information – type and timing
As discussed before, the evaluation can be summative, formative or learning oriented.
Therefore, the firm needs to specify the type and timing of information needed from an
evaluation activity. It needs to decide whether it requires process information or outcome
data. Process information targets at the improvement of the HRD program, based on
feedback received from the program and is structured before and during the event. The
outcome information represents the end of the HRD program and reports the final
outcome in terms of the effect of the program on employee learning, behaviour and so on.
Process evaluation carried ‗before‘ the activity is used in the evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design of the activity and provides answers to the
following questions:
Was need analysis accurate?
Were need appropriately translated into HRD program objectives?
Was the HRD program designed to meet all the above objectives?
Were HRD methods suitable for the delivery of objectives?
Process evaluation carried ‗during' the activity is used in the evaluation
of the effectiveness of delivery of the activity and provides answers to the
following questions:
How effective was the facilitator in delivering learning objectives using
appropriate learning techniques?
Did facilitator use an appropriate methodology of learning?
Did facilitator adhere to the learning plan laid out for the HRD program?
Outcome evaluation determines the extent to which the HRD program
met the pre-determined standards. Following from Kirkpatrick's four-level
model of evaluation, four outcomes are generally assessed:
Reaction outcomes – a perception of the learning experience
Learning outcomes – achievement of learning objectives and transfer of learning
on the job
Behaviour outcomes – changes in on job behaviour and performance
Organisational outcomes – measures of changes in firms‘ activities and
operational functioning, the extent to which HRD could address the performance
gaps identified during learning need analysis of HRD cycle
Out of all the models listed above, Kirkpatrick's four-level model is the most widely used model
to evaluate the effectiveness of HRD programs. These models have their own set of limitations.
A major limitation is a relationship between different levels in the model, which is it is not
necessary that positive reactions to the program will generate learning and necessitate positive
changes in job performance. It is difficult to gauge how the learning and behaviour changes
translate into organisational performance metrics. It is also very difficult to factor out the effect
of external variables when considering the evaluation outcomes.
Contextual models
Contextual approaches to evaluation don't solely focus on quantification of evaluation outcomes,
rather they emphasize on the enhancement of context of these HRD programs, that is,
enhancement of learning processes. In this sense, contextual models include assessment of both
tangible and intangible benefits to a firm resulting from evaluation such as customer satisfaction
etc. The contextual approach implies that organisations respond collectively as a system to cope
with environmental uncertainties (system oriented framework). The different models
encompassed under the contextual approach to HRD are discussed as under:CIRO model
CIRO model lists four general categories of evaluation abbreviated as a letter in the acronym
CIRO:
Context evaluation – to obtain and use information about the current operational context
to determine training needs and objectives. This process determined whether training is
required and evaluates three types of objectives:
o Ultimate objectives – an organisational deficiency that the HRD program will
overcome
o Intermediate objectives – changes in employee's job behaviour necessary to
achieve the ultimate objective
o Immediate objective – acquisition of new knowledge, skills and abilities to reach
intermediate objectives
Input evaluation - to obtain and use information about possible training resources, both
internal and external and determining how they can be used to achieve maximum results
Reaction evaluation - to obtain and use information about participant reactions towards
HRD processes and programs. Since it collects subjective information from participants,
it is a very useful step for effective design and delivery of the HRD programs.
Outcome evaluation - to obtain and use information about the results or outcomes of
HRD programs. This process inculcates four stages which are
o Defining trend objectives
o Selecting some measures of these objectives
o Making the measurements at appropriate times
o Assessing the results and using for improvements in training programs
CIPP model
Another framework for evaluation CIPP is also an acronym which stands for – Context, Input,
Process and Product. This model has been developed by educators for the evaluation of
management training and development. The four basic areas of evaluation are:
Context evaluation – involves defining the environment for evaluation, identification of
need and opportunities for HRD. One of the major tasks in this need analysis.
Input evaluation implies how effectively the HRD resources can be utilised to meet the
identified needs and objectives. This area lays down general strategy for program design
such as framing of policies, budgets, schedules, proposals and procedures.
Process evaluation implies providing feedback to individuals who are involved in HRD
implementation. This involves monitoring the process of implementation and then using
data collection methods (obtrusive and interactive, formal and informal) such as ratings,
reactions, and record analysis to describe and discern what is actually occurring.
Product evaluation involves actual measurement and interpretation of results to interpret
the intended and unintended outcomes. The evaluation can occur both during and after
the program and even using traditional procedures of evaluation.
Systems-oriented framework
This approach allows the organisation to adopt a broader framework for evaluation and allows
firms to:
assess the features or context of learning intervention such as organisational support
towards HRD intervention in terms of organisational values, culture, technology
consideration of techniques to promote and communicate about the HRD programs to
potential participants
consider inputs used in HRD programs such as learning techniques and topics to be
covered
consider process implying the content and mechanisms of delivery
consider output implies outcomes of the program at the individual level and
organisational level
Process of evaluation
Following from a vast variety of models and approaches available to gauge the effectiveness of
HRD programs, a complete step by step model for carrying out evaluation has been presented
below (Phillips, 2004). The model may be terminated or shortened as per the specific
requirements of any organisation.
Conduct a needs assessment and develop tentative objectives
Needs assessment is carried to address performance deficiencies and can be
conducted through questionnaires, interviews, surveys etc. Typically, the output of needs
assessment program would involve a description of performance deficiencies of target
employees in terms of skills, knowledge and abilities; and then developing a tentative
objective for each need assessed.
Identify the purpose of evaluation
The purpose can be process-based or outcome-based, this should be clearly
specified.
Establish baseline data, if any
For effective evaluation, data for comparison prior to the program and after its
completion must be available. Baseline data aids HRD professionals to direct efforts in a
clearer manner on the need for HRD interventions
Select evaluation method/ design
This involves answering the questions regarding technique to evaluate in the
context of the learning environment, participants, program content and laid down
objectives. Some of the methods can be examinations, feedback, follow-ups, action plans
and performance contracts.
Determine the evaluation strategy
This step requires answering ‗Who' will conduct evaluation – the role of
facilitators, supervisors and learners; ‗Where' to conduct evaluation – in the classroom,
on the job, off the job and so on; and ‗When' to conduct evaluation – during, after, before
the program?
Finalise program objectives
Ideally, relate each objective with baseline data to provide clear direction as to
whether the HRD program should be conducted and what is the expected outcome?
Estimate program costs/ benefits
Specific cost estimates can be generated for each stage of the HRD cycle which
can in turn aid in determining estimated costs for evaluation. ROI estimates may seldom
be needed since the organisation might consider going ahead with the planned HRD
program irrespective of ROI estimates.
Prepare and present the proposal
A professional unbiased summary of the proposal for evaluation needs to be
presented to top management. The proposal should be carefully designed keeping in mind
the target audience profile, location of presentation, timing and anticipate questions and
prepare a follow-up plan
Design evaluation instruments
Instrument here implies the data gathering tool to gauge reactions, changes in
learning, behaviour and attitude as a result of the HRD program. Some of the widely used
instruments are – record keeping systems, interviews, surveys, questionnaires etc.
Determine and develop program content
This is the most time intensive step. Content may be developed by subject matter
experts and careful review by top management. Program material should strictly adhere
to training objectives
Design or select delivery methods
An appropriate method of delivery should be chosen based on budget, available
resources, program objectives, time frame, the ability of participant and facilitators, and
location of training. Fourteen methods of delivery are presentation-discussion like
lectures, conference, case study, role play, workshop, computer-based instruction,
simulation and games, on the job training, peer training, programmed instruction, team
training, demonstration, field trips and preparatory format.
Test programs and make revisions
Pre-program and post-program evaluations, gauging participant reactions and
behaviour simulations can be observed while testing the HRD program and appropriate
changes can be inculcated before the final launch of the program
Implement or conduct programs
An important part of this step is to create awareness among the participants of
expected outcomes of the program.
Collect data at proper stages
Scheduling of appropriate data collection timings, deciding on the method of
evaluation at each stage is vital to successful evaluation.
Analyse and interpret data
Data analysis of the collected data may involve statistical analysis such as
measures of central tendency, measures of dispersion and measures of association.
Make program adjustments
The evaluation may indicate a complete failure of the program or part of the
program. Corrective actions need to be taken accordingly to modify the program.
Calculate ROI
If economically program failed to meet the objective, then ROI might be
computed using the formula:
These can be compared with the company's targeted capital expenditures and then
HRD may decide whether the financial resources were effectively utilised or not?
Communicate program results
The final step involves communicating the program results to HRD staff,
management, participants, and supervisors of participants. It may involve communicating
with other key participants in HRD activities if any.
3.5 Measures used for evaluation
This section explores the methods used to gather information necessary to carry evaluation. For
quantitative approaches, the data is gathered by calculating outcomes and scoring behaviours on
predetermined scales. For qualitative approaches, data is gathered using interviews,
observational techniques by allowing people to express.
3.7 Summary
This chapter began with an introduction to the context of evaluation, purpose and importance of
evaluating HRD programs for effectiveness. This is imperative since firms invest substantial
resources such as time and money in HRD programs and these programs have been seen to be
vital for a company's overall performance. Therefore, HRD professionals need to demonstrate
what is the impact of HRD programs and activities towards overall firm's functioning and
performance? The evaluation phase also forms a major part of the HRD cycle. Then a discussion
on commonly used models for evaluation has been presented in the chapter – contextual and
hierarchical models. While the former adopt an integral approach to the evaluation of learning
and HRD programs, the latter focuses on the quantitative part. Then a brief discussion of
methods and tools commonly used to evaluate HRD effectiveness is presented. The chapter
concludes with a discussion on what is necessary to build a culture conducive for HRD
effectiveness and what are the organisational blockages, which impede successful evaluation.
Further different responsibilities shared by different stakeholders in the evaluation process is
presented and a brief explanation of the Pygmalion effect has been provided.
3.8 Keywords
„Hard variant‟ model of HRD - which implies human resources need to be treated like
other physical resources, that is, obtained cheaply and used to the maximum
„Soft variant‟ model of HRD - which lays emphasis on mutual growth of the firm and
its human resources
„5-P model‟ of HRD - which emphasises that HRM and HRD are an integral part of
business strategy and requires the development of the 5Ps of HRD - policies, practices,
programmes, philosophy and processes
Evaluation of HRD programs - involves measurement and use of data, concerning the
outcome, that is the effectiveness of HRD intervention‖ – (Blanchard and Thakur, 2014)
HRD evaluation - involves a systemic collection of information necessary to make
effective learning decisions related to the selection, adoption, value and modification of
various instructional activities‖ – (Werner and DeSimone, 2012)
Summative evaluation – usually carried out at the end of HRD intervention, by
assessing the effectiveness of the outcomes of the HRD program, against the objectives
predetermined for that program
Formative evaluation– usually ongoing form of evaluation, looking for areas for
improvement in HRD the program on a continual basis to make it more effective
Learning-oriented evaluation – assessing the extent to which individual undergoing the
HRD program is able to transfer the learning from program content to the job and
improve performance
Process-outcome - targets at the improvement of the HRD program, based on feedback
received from the program, and are structured before and during the event.
Information outcome - represents the end of the HRD program and reports the final
outcome in terms of the effect of the program on employee learning, behaviour and so on
Hierarchical models - for evaluation of HRD programs focus on outcomes within the
organisation. They are also termed as quantitative or scientific models and incorporate
objective techniques for measurement, providing a means to perform cost-benefit
analysis or ROI of an HRD activity.
Kirkpatrick‟s four-level model - This is one of the most widely used models for
evaluation and suggests what to evaluate along a hierarchy of learning outcomes
associated with an HRD program. It suggests four different levels of outcomes and
associated evaluation: Reactions, Learning, Behaviour and Results.
Hamblin five-level evaluation framework - This model is similar to Kirkpatrick's
model, the only addition of another level is to place greater emphasis on results and
higher levels of the hierarchy in the evaluation. The fifth level is a measure of totality.
Philip‟s ROI model - As the name of the model suggests, this model adds an ROI (return
on investment) step in Kirkpatrick's four-level model. The five levels are Reaction and
Planned Action, Learning, Job Applications, Business Results, and ROI.
Brinkerhoff‟s six-stage model - This approach assumes that HRD is a continuous
ongoing activity, and therefore it is possible to modify the HRD program to improve it.
The model is known as Success Case Method (SCM), and its six stages are – goal setting,
program design, program implementation, immediate outcome measurement,
intermediate or usage outcome measurement and overall impact.
Contextual models - include assessment of both tangible and intangible benefits to a
firm resulting from evaluation such as customer satisfaction etc. The contextual approach
implies that organisations respond collectively as a system to cope with environmental
uncertainties.
CIRO model - CIRO model lists four general categories of evaluation abbreviated as a
letter in the acronym CIRO: Context, Input, Reactions and Output evaluation
Partnership model of learning - The partnership model of learning is known to adopt a
responsive approach to evaluation, which implies that aggregate value contribution of an
HRD program can be assessed only when the perceptions of various concerned parties
towards the program is included in it. The four main areas of evaluation as per this
approach are Learning function, ROE, ROI and Benchmark and capacity indicators.
CIPP model - Another framework for evaluation CIPP is also an acronym which stands
for – Context, Input, Process and Product. This model has been developed by educators
for the evaluation of management training and development.
Systems-oriented framework - This approach allows the organisation to adopt a broader
framework for evaluation and allows firms to respond collectively as a system to cope
with environmental uncertainties.
Pygmalion effect - asserts that when one has a positive attitude, his influence will
positively impact other's behaviour and consequently performance would increase for all.
STRUCTURE
4.0. OBJECTIVES
4.1. COACHING: MEANING AND DEFINITION
4.1.1. TYPES OF COACHING
4.1.2. PROCESS OF COACHING
4.2.3. BENEFITS OF COACHING
4.2. MENTORING: MEANING AND DEFINITION
4.1.1. CHARATERISTICS OF MENTORING
4.1.2. IMPORTANCE OF MENTORING
4.2.3. MENTORING TECHNIQUES
4.2.4. OBJECTIVES OF MENTORING PROGRAM
4.2.5. BENEFITS OF MENTORSHIP
4.3. SOCILAISATION: MEANING AND DEFINITION
4.3.1. IMPORTANCE OF SOCIALISTION
4.3.2. PROCESS OF SOCIALISTAION
4.4. ORIENTATION: MEANING AND DEFINITION
4.4.1. OBJECTIVES OF ORIENTATION
4.4.2. IMPORTANCE OF ORIENTATION
4.4.3. TYPES OF ORIENTATION
4.5. TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT: MEANING AND DEFINITION
4.5.1. PROCESS OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5.2. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5.3. IMPORTANCE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5.4. NEED FOR TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5.5. ADVANTAGE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5.6. DISADVANTAGE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4.6. SUMMARY
4.7. KEY WORDS
4.8. SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
4.9. REFERENCE/ SUGGESTED READING
4.2. MENTORING
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS:
Mentoring is a process of using specially selected and trained individuals to provide guidance,
pragmatic advice, and continuing support that will help the people in their learning and
development process. Mentoring is a method of helping people acquire skills and knowledge
from experienced managers who are wise in the way of the organization.
According to David Clutterbuck, ‘Mentoring involves primarily listening with empathy, sharing
experience, professional friendship, developing insight through reflection, being a sounding
board, encouraging’.
According to Jacobi, ‘Mentoring is a one to one helping relationship or nurturing processes.
According to Vickie L. Nadolski, ‘Mentoring is linking an experienced person (mentor) with a less
experience person (mentee) to help their personal and professional growth’.
Mentoring is the Employee training system under which a senior or more experienced person
(the mentor) is assigned to act as an advisor, counselor, or guide to a junior or trainee. The
mentor is responsible for providing support to, and feedback on, the person in his or her
charge.
Mentoring is the process of sharing your knowledge and experience with an employee.
Mentoring can be informal or formal:
o Informal mentoring takes place spontaneously between senior and more junior
employees.
o Formal mentoring occurs through a program with an established structure.
A mentor can be an employee’s manager or not:
o Management typically involves at least some employee mentoring. In acting as a
mentor for an employee who reports to you, think of yourself as an advocate for
that employee—not for any particular behaviour, but for the person—for their
personal growth and career. Discipline can then become a matter of helping an
employee out of a difficult situation.
o In formal mentoring programs, the mentor is typically not the employee’s
manager, nor even in the employee’s chain of command.
4.2.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF MENTORING:
1. Mentoring requires a high degree of mutual trust between the mentor and the mentee.
2. Effective communication is the key to the mentoring programmes.
3. The success of mentoring depends on the availability of the mentor and predictability.
4. It is a systematic process of building a partnership.
5. Self-esteem and confidence is necessary for effective mentoring.
6. Mutual respect between each other is also required.
Organisation will be benefited if good managers and employees work with them.
Employee turnover ratio is also decreased.
Employees will feel comfortable in an organisation.
Organisation recruitment cost will be decreased. If employees stay for long time in
organisation then there is less need for new recruitment.
Employees’ retention rate in organisation will be increased.
4.3. SOCIALISATION
It refers to process of making the new employees get acquainted to the new environment of
the organization. This reduces the anxiety of the new hires and allows them to adjust with the
other existing employees in the company.
In order to reduce the anxiety that new employees may experience, attempts should be made
to integrate the person into the informal organization. The initial training and development
effort designed for employees is Socialization, the guided adjustment of new employees to the
company, the job, and the work group.
4.4. ORIENTATION
Orientation is the planned introduction of new employees to their jobs, co-workers, and the
organization. The orientation is meant to educate new employees about the goals and
responsibilities of the position and company, as well as to answer any questions they may have
about HR, benefits and payroll information. An introductory stage in the process of new
employee assimilation, and a part of his or her continuous socialization process in an
organization.
4.4.1. OBJECTIVES OF ORIENTATION :
(1) Gain employee commitment,
(2) Reduce his or her anxiety,
(3) Help him or her understand organization's expectations, and
(4) Convey what he or she can expect from the job and the organization.
It is commonly followed by training tailored to specific job positions. See also acculturation and
company orientation.
Typically, orientation conveys three types of information – (i) general information about the
daily work routine; (ii) a review of the firm’s history, founding fathers, objectives, operations
and products or services, as well as how the employee’s job contributes to the organisation’s
needs; and (iii) a detailed presentation, perhaps, in a brochure, of the organisation’s policies,
work rules and employee benefits.
1. To Reduce Start-up Costs: Proper orientation can help the employee get up to speed
much more quickly, thereby reducing the costs associated with learning the job.
2. To Reduce Anxiety: Any employee, when put into a new, strange situation, will
experience anxiety that can impede his or her ability to learn to do the job. Proper
orientation helps to reduce anxiety that results from entering into an unknown
situation, and helps provide guidelines f or behaviour and conduct, so the employee
doesn't have to experience the stress of guessing.
3. To Reduce Employee Turnover: Employee turnover increases as employees feel they
are not valued, or are put in positions where they can't possibly do their jobs.
Orientation shows that the organization values the employee, and helps provide the
tools necessary for succeeding in the job.
4. To Save Time For Supervisor and Co-Workers: Simply put, the better the initial
orientation, the less likely supervisors and co-workers will have to spend time teaching
the employee.
5. To Develop Realistic Job Expectations, Positive Attitudes and Job Satisfaction: It is
important that employees learn as soon as possible what is expected of them, and what
to expect from others, in addition to learning about the values and attitudes of the
organization. While people can learn from experience, they will make many mistakes
that are unnecessary and potentially damaging
1. Formal or Informal: In informal orientation, new hires are directly put on the jobs and
they are expected to acclimatise themselves with the work and the company. In contrast,
orientation can be formal too. In formal orientation, the management has a structured
programme which is executed when new employees join the firm. The choice between
formal and informal orientation will depend on the management’s goals. The more
formal the programme, the greater the likelihood that the new hire will acquire a known
set of standards. That is, the new member is more likely to think and act like an
executive, a management trainee, or a management professor. But an informal
programme is desirable to maintain individual differences.
2. Individual or Collective: Another choice to be made by the management is whether the
new hires should be inducted individually or in groups. The individual approach is likely
to develop tin less homogeneous views than collective orientation. Individual orientation
is more likely to preserve individual differences and perspectives. Orienting each person
separately is an expensive and time consuming process. It also denies the new hire the
opportunity of sharing anxieties with fellow appointees. Collective orientation of the new
hires solves the problems stated above. Most large firms tend to have the collective
orientation approach. But small firms, which have fewer new appointees to socialize
frequently use the individual approach. Individual socialization is popular even with large
firm when they hire executives whose number is small.
3. Serial or Disjunctive: Orientation becomes serial when an experienced employee inducts
a new hire. The experienced employee acts as a tutor and model for the new hire. When
new hires do not have predecessors available to guide them or to model their behaviour
upon, the orientation become disjunctive. Each option has its own advantages and
pitfalls. Serial orientation maintains traditions and cus-toms. Consistent use of this
strategy will ensure a minimum amount of change within the firm over time. But,
maintenance of status quo itself may breed resistance to change. Further, if the
experienced employee is frustrated and apathetic towards work and the firm, it is likely
that he or she would pass on the same to the new hire. Disjunctive orientation almost
stands on the other side of the spectrum. Such induction is likely to produce more
inventive and creative employees because the new hire is not burdened by traditions.
But this benefit needs to be weighed against the potential for creating deviants, that is,
individuals who fail-due to an inadequate role model-to understand how their job is to
be done and bow it fits into the grand scheme of the company.
TRAINING DEVELOPMENT
Training is meant for operatives Development is meant for executives
OBJECTIVE: To meet the present need of an OBJECTIVE: To meet the future need of an
employee employee
4.6. SUMMARY
The human resource development process includes all the activities regarding the coaching,
mentoring, socialisation, orientation, training and development. These all activities are
interconnected and interrelated.
4.7. KEY WORDS
1. Coaching refers to counselling, guiding or instructing the learner about the short term job-
related skills or long term career hazards.
2. Mentoring is a process of using specially selected and trained individuals to provide
guidance, pragmatic advice, and continuing support that will help the people in their learning
and development process.
3. Socialisation refers to process of making the new employees get acquainted to the new
environment of the organization.
4. Orientation is the planned introduction of new employees to their jobs, co-workers, and the
organization.
5. Training and Development is a subsystem of an organization which emphasize on the
improvement of the performance of individuals and groups
5.1. INTRODUCTION
5.9. SUMMARY
Career Development
• How individuals can reach the top?
• How organisations can help?
• Self-assessment tools
• Individual counselling
• Information services
• Assessment programmes
• Development programmes
• Programmes for special groups
1. Economic Downsizing: The biggest of all the factors that has badly affected the careers of
millions of individuals is economic downsizing. The jobs are cut from the organizations and the
fittest of all employees survive. If employees continuously learn new and better skills, chances
are that economic conditions won‘t hurt them that badly as compared to other individuals.
2. De-layering: De-layering means reclassification of jobs. This is an organizational change
initiative where a company decides to reclassify the jobs more broadly. However, old reporting
lines do exist in order to maintain managerial control but some jobs may be removed or cut down
during the process. Again, those individuals have to leave the organization who are not competent
enough to be shifted to other job with different nature.
3. Cost Reduction Strategies of the Organization: Cost-reduction strategies of the organizations
are again very dangerous for those individuals who are not prepared to move on to the next level.
If organizations have to cut down their operating costs, the employment of those individuals is at
stake who are not employable or who have not performed up to the mark in past. Employees
continuously need to upgrade themselves and show their talent in order to remain in the
organizations till long.
4. IT Innovations: Continuous changes and up-gradation in the technology is also one of the major
factors that bring change. Some individuals can keep a pace with the changing technology and are
always ready to learn and adopt new IT applications while some show immense resistance which
is not acceptable to the organizations. Employees need to keep themselves updated and show
willingness to accept changes as and when they occur and mould themselves accordingly.
The business changes affect both organizations and employees. The need is to understand them and find a
way to cope with them effectively.
5.4.2. COMPONENTS OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
A career development system includes a variety of components for use in the organizations. In order to
increase the efficiency of the system, the HR mangers must have complete knowledge about these tools
since they play a role of consultant when employees and supervisors use this system. Plus, they are
responsible for designing and developing an effective career development system for their organization.
Some activities or components are known as individual career planning tools while some are used for
organizational career management. To achieve greater efficiency, most organizations use a right
combination of both types of activities. Let us understand these tools and activities to learn in-depth about
career development system:
Self-Assessment Tools: This is the first technique that is widely used by organizations in their efforts to
career management of their employees. This is a career exploration tool where individuals complete self-
assessment exercises and fill information about their skills, interests, competencies, work attitudes and
preferences, long and short term goals and obstacles and opportunities. The whole exercise helps them
understand their own desires and aspirations and likes and dislikes.
Career Planning Workshops: Once employees are through their self-assessment, they share their
findings with other individuals and their supervisors in career-planning workshops. It allows them to
receive feedback from others and check the reality of their plans and aspirations. They may change their
plans if they find them unrealistic and move in new direction.
Individual Counselling: It is one of the most common activities that are undertaken by almost all people
developing organizations. Generally, individual counselling is provided by career development
specialists, HR specialists or life skills development trainers. Some organizations hire them from outside
while some have their own full-fledged departments where they recruit and hire trainers for full time. It
helps employees in understanding their own goals, making a change in them if required and working on
improving their skills and competencies.
Organizational Assessment Programs: Organizational assessment programs include tools and methods
for evaluating employees‘ potential for growth within the organization. Johnson & Johnson is one
company that uses these programs to assess the careers of their employees and evaluate their potential in
order to facilitate the staffing and development of special teams known as ―tiger teams‖. These special
teams are formed to speed up the development of new products. The most popular programs under this
category include assessment centres, psychological testing, 360 degree appraisal, promotability forecasts
and succession planning.
Developmental Programs: Developmental programs are used by an organization to develop their
employees for future positions. They can be internal as well as external and can be performed under the
supervision of human resource staff or trainers and specialists from outside. These programs include
assessment centers, job rotation programs, tuition refund plans, internal training programs, external
training seminars and formal mentoring programs.
In addition to these programs, there are several other components of a career development system such as
career programs for special target groups, fast-track or high potential employees, supervisors, senior-level
employees, women, technical employees, minorities and employees with disabilities, etc.
Career Programs for Special Target Groups
Career development programs are designed to meet specific needs and requirements of a particular group
of employees. They can be developed for a particular department of special target groups. Depending
upon the group for which the program is to be designed, the activities and workshops involved in it also
change accordingly. Therefore, before designing and developing a career development program, it is very
essential to analyze the requirements of the targeted group. However, there can be some common
programs that can be used for all groups within the organizations. There are several different groups in an
organization including Fast-track Employees, entrenched employees, supervisors, executives, new
employees, women, employees with disabilities and many more.
Career Programs for Fast-Track Employees
Fast-track employees are the star performers who have potential to do more that what they are supposed
to. The organizations place such employees in fast fast-track groups for quick and upward moves. These
are specially selected employees from various groups and departments who are given an opportunity for
rapid and intensive development.
These employees require continuous technical as well as psychological training in order to expand their
horizons and develop such skills that they can perform more challenging jobs of different kinds. Fast-
track employees are also able to manage quicker job changes particularly in the time of crisis. The
organization can design high-ended career development programs for them to ensure their quick and
intensive development.
Career Programs for Entrenched Employees
Since organizations undergo a lot of restructuring and cutback due to recession and streamlining of their
activities and operations. Because of this, many employees are asked to leave the organization and
explore some other career opportunity. In order to eliminate negative consequences, organizations can
start career programs for this special group in order to help them find a new job. Organizations can offer
generous severance pay packages to them to fund their career explorations. Along with this, they can also
introduce schemes such as pension funds and accrued time off. They can also provide ongoing career
development training and counselling and outplacement assistance to them.
Career Programs for Supervisors
When every group requires different career development programs, obviously the needs of supervisors
will also be different from other employees. The can be provided with continuous training, counselling
and coaching on how to lead teams and recognize special skills in an employee. Since they act as mentors
of their subordinates, they should be provided with an integrated counselling on performance appraisal
system and how to use it in order to measure the performance of their subordinates.
Career Programs for Women
With increasing numbers of women entering the workplace, the organizations must develop special career
programs for them. Organizations need to identify their problems and challenges that they face on regular
basis and try to develop special programs while keeping all these points and considerations in mind. Since
women are good multi-taskers, the HR specialists should make special efforts to enhance their abilities
and capabilities and motivate them to perform better regardless of the circumstances and difficulties in
their personal lives. They have different problems and different requirements when it comes to career.
This should be kept in mind while designing specialized programs for them.
5.4.3. DESIGNING CAREER DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
Designing career development systems according to specific needs and requirements of an organization
can help HR specialists in bringing efficiency to the entire process of career management. Since the
system tries to integrate all the activities of an employee, management as well as an organization, it has to
be tailor-designed. There is nothing that fits all since the nature of the every business is different and
aspirations of every employee in every industry are different. Most companies along with career
management programs also involve career assessment process by the employee. If they have supportive
environment such as a facilitator and properly automated system, they will properly assess their careers
and fill genuine information about themselves.
Most organizations such as Xerox, IBM, Wal-Mart, Lincoln electric and Bell Atlantic have their own
specific career development systems. Along with this, they provide their employees with supportive
environment and a culture that supports the whole process of career development. This is the reason why
these companies are considered as the best places to work. Since they manage the careers of their
employees seriously and treat them as the most valuable assets of the organization, a very high percentage
of university graduates prefer joining them even if they offer low compensation.
While designing career development system for an organization, the nature of their business, the industry
and the business environment they are operating in should also be considered. Although it is an internal
process of an organization but outer environment factors such as job market, current trends, economic
conditions, etc., affect the entire process.
5.4.4. Benefits of a Career Development System
Job Evaluation
Project Planning
Performance Management
Job Analysis
Succession Planning
Recruitment
5.10. SUMMARY
1.
A career is a sequence of positions occupied by a person during the course of his/her life
time.
2. Career planning is a process of identifying strengths, weaknesses, specific goals and jobs that
individuals like to occupy.
3. Succession planning refers to an inventory indicating which individuals are ready to move
into higher positions in the company.
4. A career consists of five stages, viz., exploration, establishment, mid-career, late - career and
decline.
5. Career planning process, includes activities like analysing employee needs and aspirations,
analysing career opportunities, identifying congruence and incongruence, and action plans
and periodic review.
6. Career development is a three-step process including career need assessment, career
opportunities, and need-opportunity alignment.
7. Career management refers to a set of activities including those of both the individual
employee and organisation aimed at coping with changes in career plans, whether caused by
organisational requirements or individual employee‘s needs and aspirations.
KEY WORDS
Career Career Path
Career planning Career Management
Career Development Competency mapping
REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. What is meant by the term ‗career‘? Outline the process of career planning clearly.
2. Distinguish between:
(a) Career Planning and Manpower Planning.
(b) Career Planning and Succession Planning.
3. What is career development? Explain the steps involved in it.
4. ―Career development is a waste of money for a company. All it does is raise employees‘
expectations and then, frustrated, they quit.‖ Do you agree or disagree? Discuss.
5. What type of information would you seek from the human resource department to help you
develop your own career plan if you were just starting with a large multinational corporation?
REFERENCES
1. Edwin B. Flippo: Personnel Management, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1984, p.
248.
2. Edgar H. Schein: How Career Anchors Hold Executives to Their Career Path, Personnel, Vol.
52, No.3, May-June 1975, pp. 11-24.
3. Biswajeet Pattanayak: Human Resource Management, Printice-Hall of India Private Limited,
New Delhi, 2002, p. 111.
4. Edgar- H. Schein: The Individual, the Organisation, and the Career: A Conceptual Scheme
owrna/ of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol.7, 1971, pp. 401-426.
5. J. C. Alpin and D. K. Gester: Career Development: An Integration of Individual and
Organisational Needs, Personnel, March-April, 1978, p.24.
6. H. A. Shepard and J. A. Hawley: Life Planning: Personal and Organisational, National
Training and Development Service, Washington D. C., 1974.
7. E. H. Schein: Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organisational Needs, Addison-
Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1978.
8. C. S. Venkata Ratnam and B. K. Srivastava: Personnel Management and Human Resources,
Tata. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 1996, p. 144.
9. H. J. Bemardin and J.E.A. Russel: Human Resource Management, Me Graw Hill, New York,
1993, pp. 340-357.
Course Code: OBH-414
Lesson No. 7 Contemporary Issues in HRD
Author: Dr. Harpreet Kaur Kohli
Vetter: Prof. Anil Kumar
7.1 Objectives
7.2 Introduction
7.3 Role of Culture
7.4 Managing Diversity
7.5 Role of Manager in Managing Diversity
7.6 Diversity Training
7.7 Cross-cultural Education and Training
7.8 Types of Cross-cultural Training
7.9 Cross-culture education and training effectiveness
7.10 Evolution of Modern-day work force
7.11 Labour Market Discrimination
7.12 Features of Labour Market
7.13 Reward Management in TNCs
7.14 Conclusion
7.15 Questions for Exercise
7.16 Recommended Readings
7.1 OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the lesson are:
(i)To explain the role of culture in organisation
(ii)To discuss the need of managing culture
(iii)To study the types of cross-cultural training
(iv)To discuss the major challenges in labour market
7.2 INTRODUCTION
The phenomenon of globalisation has made the world a global market. When business activities
are carried out in different countries, the companies come across different economies, political
systems, cultures, markets, customers and employees. With the entry of MNCs, there is
intermingling of employees throughout the world, leading to integration and interaction among
various cultures.
Different cultures embrace different perspectives on important workplace issues, like time
management, respect for authority, teamwork and responsibility. Conflicting interpretations of
transparency and ethics, methods of communication and reluctance to give and receive feedback
may also arise.
The differences are noticed in these and it is called diversity in cultures and markets. Diversity is
a very wide term and bit difficult to define it. It includes main elements are like sex, age, race,
religion, region, work style, experience, education, values, physical and technical competencies,
trust, beliefs, traditions and customs, mental caliber, personality, experiences, affiliation,
economic development, per capita income, marital status, knowledge, preference and tastes for
products, area of specialization etc.
When clients and co-workers operate based on diverse belief systems with conflicting attitudes,
it creates barriers to on the job bonding. These barriers need to be broken down in order for an
organization to run efficiently and harmoniously. The responsibility falls on the organization's
leadership, and particularly HR professionals, to ensure that these issues are addressed and
managed. To goal is to make each worker feel valued—and that their needs are being addressed
and considered.
.
The various factors of culture created diversity in different rates. The different categories of
diversity are following:
(a) Diversity in workforce.
(b) Diversity in the markets.
(c) Stakeholder diversity.
In India and abroad, workforce diversity is the most dominating category of diversity. There are
a number of reasons for this diversity such as large percentage of working women due to
increasing education of female, younger age employees, national and international mobility of
manpower increasing job opportunities across the world, and experience at international
assignments etc.
There are different stakeholders of the company in the global era. The main stakeholders are
owners, shareholders, customers, client, bankers, consultants and government etc. They are
having different interests with the organization. There is diversity in interests of stakeholders.
These stakeholders are very sensitive and expect better performance from the company. Further,
in foreign markets due to foreign clients the diversity is increased.
During the period of foreign rule, British introduced industrialization and thereby heralded the
advent of labour sector in this country. With the emergence of native industrialists, the labour
sector expanded. The pace of industrialization and the expansion of labour sector were
accelerated by the first and second world wars.
In the early years the workers organized to obtain wages to meet limited needs for
livelihood and convenience to work decently. Labour struggle became a part of national
movement. The concepts of freedom, democracy, secularism and socialism, were
indoctrinated in the labour movement, thanks to agitations for rights of workers.
The trade union leaders of yesteryears played a glorious role in this respect. We are still
striving to ensure social security measures envisaged in the directive principles of the
Indian Constitution such as right to work, living wages, security in workplace etc. Today
the economy of the nation itself is facing grave crisis due to the impact of globalization,
and the labour sector is in the dark shadows of economic and social problems. The threats
faced by the economy of the nation, industry, agriculture and thereby the labour sector
are due to the impact of the global pressures and hence beyond our control. Yet we are
compelled to defend ourselves to protect our economic and social security.
Consequent on the grave crisis in the Indian economy, significant reforms based on
liberalization, globalization was enforced from 1991. It was these economic reforms that
dictated the industrial policy from then onward. Only after a couple of years of reforms
that negative effects on other sectors of polity came to be felt, the most affected being the
Labour.
Modern day professions as we know them had their origin in the post-industrial age after
World War II when most Western nations saw a long spell of growth. This era also saw
the emergence of modern day consumerism. To cater to the emerging needs of the
market, huge corporation built gigantic factories to manufacture products and serve the
needs of consumers.
7.11 LABOUR MARKET DISCRIMINATION
The valuation in the market place of personal characteristics of the worker that are
unrelated to worker productivity.
These personal characteristics may be sex, race, age, national origin, religion, education
or sexual preference.
Labor market discrimination may take the form of different wage rates for equally
productive workers with different personal characteristics.
Labor market discrimination may also take the form of exclusion from jobs on the
grounds of social class, union membership, or political beliefs Labor Market
Discrimination.
Discrimination is a cause of labour market failure and a source of inequity in the
distribution of income and wealth and it is usually subject to government intervention e.g.
through regulation and legislation.
Discriminatory treatment of minority groups leads to lower wages and reduced employment
opportunities, including less straining and fewer promotions. The result is that groups subject to
discrimination earn less than they would and suffer a fall in relative living standards why does
discrimination occur in the labour market?
Discrimination arises here because employers and workers have distaste for working with
people from different ethnic backgrounds or final customers dislike buying goods from
sales people from different races i.e. people prefer to associate with others from their own
groups. They are willing to pay a price to avoid contact with other groups.
Employer ignorance - Discrimination also arises because employers are unable to
directly observe the productive ability of individuals and therefore easily observable
characteristics such as gender or race may be used as proxies the employer through
ignorance or prejudice assumes that certain groups of workers are less productive than
others and is therefore less willing to employ them, or pay them a wage or salary that
fairly reflects their productivity, experience and applicability for a particular job.
Occupational crowding effects - Female and minorities may be crowded into lower
paying occupations. There is little doubt that a permanent gap exists between average pay
rates for females and males in the labour markets of UK, US, Africa, Europe & Asia.
7.12 FEATURES OF LABOUR MARKET
A country like India has tremendous labor cost advantage as far as daily or monthly
wage rates are concerned. But there are limitations due to poor quality of training and
skills, non-professional approach, low productivity and too many labor laws.
The labour market is deregulated and there is increased mobility of labour in global
markets.
Many other low cost countries like china, Mexico, Turkey, SAARC region neighbors,
some north African and Latin American countries are moving fast on learning curve and
will offer tough competition to Indian exporters in low cost labour advantage.
The real labor cost will rise in countries like India erasing much of low cost advantage of
labour
Labour market demands are changing with greater emphasis on the quality of jobs.
Labour market reforms are necessary to cope with the accelerating economic and social
restructuring associated with globalization, technological processes and the development
of an inclusive knowledge and information society and economy.
In an era of globalization where capital, technology, high skills and high productivity
play a major role in labour markets.
In India, like in many other developing countries, the growth of labour force is
accelerating and will remain high in the future also.
(1) It needs rapid economic growth with effective and efficient utilization of labour by
upgrading its skills to ensure development and employment generation.
(2) Intervention is required in labour markets to promote employment and its quality.
(3) Quality of work - including training, career prospects and work organization - makes a
valuable contribution towards increasing employment and productivity.
(4) Improvements in the quality of work may increase the efficiency of production processes
by allowing employers to exploit fully the potential of new technologies.
(5) They are further likely to increase employees' motivation and job satisfaction.
(6) Upgrading the quality of labour force by pursuing suitable education and skill
development policies.
(7) Low quality of jobs and low productivity are directly attributable to low level of skills.
The latter poses a serious challenge to integration of the labour force in world economy.
(8) There is overwhelming evidence that whereas educated and skilled workers are generally
able to derive some benefits of new opportunities as a result of globalization, it is the uneducated
and unskilled workers on whom the burden of re-structuring falls.
(9) Designing appropriate training systems is, therefore, an important means to deal with
labour market instabilites like under employment, skill mismatch and redundancy.
(10) Higher productivity of labour would, apart from dignity of labour, improve the living
standards of workers and also help the industry in facing international competition.
(11) An increase in overall productivity and skill up-gradation will lead to progressive
absorption of large number of workers from informal or unorganized sector to the formal or
organized sector and ensure rapid economic growth.
(12) Quality of labour force also determines their employability abroad or in institutions of
foreign origin including multinational organization.
(13) Manpower development to provide rising labour force with skills and training according
to the emerging demand pattern is essential to eliminate the mismatch between the supply of and
demand for labour.
This strategic perspective on the linkage between HRM and strategy is very vital for a
TNC/MNCs' success. A TNC/MNC that can develop a highly trained, flexible, and motivated
international workforce is at an advantage relative to its competitors, especially if that work force
can be used strategically.
7.14 Summary
The phenomenon of globalisation has made the world a global market. When business activities
are carried out in different countries, the companies come across different economies, political
systems, cultures, markets, customers and employees. With the entry of MNCs, there is
intermingling of employees throughout the world, leading to integration and interaction among
various cultures. The differences are noticed in these and it is called diversity in cultures and
markets.
The intermingling of workforce from different cultures has created cultural diversity,
which is a feature of contemporary business organisations. Managers need to be aware about the
issues and challenges related to cultural diversity as its proper management is vital to create a
conducive environment for business. Managing a culturally diverse workforce requires a long-
term, integrated effort. Success is possible with top management commitment, an inclusive view
of diversity, actions based on a combination of legal, moral, and economic arguments, along with
coordinated HRD efforts that promote diversity.
The labour market faces discrimination. Proper compensation strategies of TNCs can go
a long way in promoting industrial peace and proper work environment. Labour market reforms
are necessary to cope with the accelerating economic and social restructuring associated with
globalization, technological processes and the development of an inclusive knowledge and
information society and economy.
Human Resource Development-Text and Cases by Ram Kumar Balyan and Suman Balyan