Firebreaks/ Greenbreaks
Firebreaks/ Greenbreaks
Firebreaks/ Greenbreaks
Classification
Land use problems:
- Forest fire, competition with weedy species (expert's point of view)
spread of invasive alien species (land user's point of view)
Land use Climate Degradation Conservation measure
Environment
Natural Environment
Average annual rainfall Altitude (m a.s.l.) Landform Slope (%)
(mm)
Soil depth (cm) Growing season(s): 0 days Soil water storage capacity: medium
Soil texture: medium (loam) Ground water table: < 5 m
0-20 Soil fertility: medium Availability of surface water: medium
20-50 Topsoil organic matter: medium (1-3%) Biodiversity: high
50-80 Soil drainage/infiltration: medium
80-120
>120
Tolerant of climatic extremes: temperature increase, droughts / dry spells
Human Environment
Forests / woodlands per Land user: employee (company, government), Importance of off-farm income: :
household (ha) medium scale land users, common / average land Access to service and infrastructure: low:
users, men and women technical assistance, employment (eg off-farm), market,
<0.5 Population density: 10-50 persons/km2 roads & transport, drinking water and sanitation;
0.5-1 Annual population growth: 1% - 2% moderate: health, education, energy
1-2 Land ownership: state Market orientation: subsistence (self-supply)
Land use rights: open access (unorganised) Purpose of forest / woodland use: fruits and nuts,
2-5
Relative level of wealth: poor, which represents other forest products / uses (honey, medical, etc.)
5-15 100% of the land users; 100% of the total area is
15-50 owned by poor land users
50-100
100-500
500-1,000
1,000-10,000
>10,000
Technical drawing
Remarks:
Assessment
Impacts of the Technology
Production and socio-economic benefits Production and socio-economic disadvantages
Through the technology, People Organization (PO) members were encouraged to plant cash crops as greenbreaks as
an immediate source of food and additional income.
Acceptance / adoption:
100% of land user families have implemented the technology with external material support. The Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR) provided financial and technical support in the establishment of the technology.
0% of land user families have implemented the technology voluntary. No spontaneous adoption was recorded without the
support of the government (DENR) or private agencies.
Concluding statements
Strengths and how to sustain/improve Weaknesses and how to overcome
Relative small financial input in the establishment of the Fires could cross on the firebreaks because of big and
technology Regular clearing of firebreaks overlapping canopies. Regular trimming on the canopies of
trees near the firelines and brushing of weeds/grasses.
The technology does not require heavy equipment and
instrument during the establishment Use of indigenous tools
during establishment such as hoe and plows