Sw23 Cheetham
Sw23 Cheetham
Sw23 Cheetham
embodied for all created beings in their Fravarti or personal angel and
soul’s guide, and illuminates the path of the soul’s personal embodiment
of the Light through spiritual transformation. Similarly, the Light of God
appears as the “Burning Bush” in Judaism, the apparitions of Gabriel to
Mary and Muhammad, and as the symbolic “Light upon Light” of the
Surah of Light in Islam. These are images of the divine theophany and
of the soul’s destiny to actualize on earth the “Energy of sacral Light”
through spiritual transformation.
From the Muslim texts that he studied, Corbin learned how life could
be viewed as a “dramaturgy”, an awakening of the soul through its
encounter with its archetypal image in the “imago mundi”—with the
personified presence of the soul’s Heavenly Twin, its Guiding Angel or
Fravarti. The soul’s encounter with its “Angel” is to be understood here
as its submission to the active Intelligence. The Angel is identified with
such figures as the Paraclete in the Gospel of St. John, or Khidr in the
Qur’an, with the Archangel Gabriel, and with the Logos or Angel Holy
Spirit. Corbin was greatly influenced here not only by Suhrawardi’s
revival of Mazdean angelology, but also by the Kubrawite phenomenol‑
ogy of lights and colors developed by the central Asian school of Sufism
of Najm al-Din Kubra (1146–1220), and his followers Najmeddin Razi
(d. 1256) and Alaoddawleh Semnani (1261–1336), as well as the illumi‑
nationist metaphysics (of illumination as the “intensification of being”
and inner light) associated with the Persian, Mulla Sadra.This “imaginal”
encounter with the Angel, with “the light of that Presence which is the
ultimate source of all personification” formed the basis of the soul’s
individuation, its ethical valorization and its harmonization with the
world. Cheetham notes: “It is not too much to say that Corbin’s entire
work revolves around the ontological priority of the individual. It is the
Presence of the Angel that provides the conditions for the possibility of
the experience of the Person.”
It is only through our interiority and heliotropic orientation to the
Angel Face that we can hope to unveil the theophanies of the soul and
the world. The Angel is the inner Guide, the exegete, the Intellect, the
“Khidr of your being.” It is also the hermeneutical principle or ta’wil,
the opening to the Origin, unveiling the Divine Face that is uniquely and
“imaginally” discernable by each visionary. Here, knowledge and being
interpenetrate. How we see the world is dependent on the quality of
abstractly, through their personas, but as the iconic face of the Beloved,
in the esoteric unity of Love, Lover and Beloved.
For Corbin, beauty is the essential divine attribute and the source and
reality of our love. To perceive this divine beauty, however, requires a
quality of attention and perception that has an ethical foundation, one
that is premised on the profound connections between ascesis and
aesthetics, between renunciation and beauty. Cheetham uses this idea to
provide a critique of modernity in respect of the loss of this dimension
of perception, suggesting that is required to regain an appreciation of
beauty in the world is a quality of detachment. To “refuse to become
unconsciously ensnared by the allurements of a commercialized world…
(t)o begin to be sensitive to the manifold effects of this impersonal
world on our actions, thoughts, and emotions and so gain some distance
from it is already an act of renunciation and of aesthetic discrimination.”
[Though Cheetham uses the word “renunciation” in this quote, the bet‑
ter term might have been “detachment.”] But the detachment that pulls
us away from things must be balanced by the sympathy that draws us
to them. Aesthetics, Cheetham observes, is rooted in a cosmological
synaesthesia: “All the beings of the world are connected within and
among themselves by the vibrations of harmonic sympathy. Our place
among them is not one of dominion, but of interconnection.”The imagi‑
nation is synaesthetic, filled with harmonic sympathy:“When harmonic
sympathy is fully in operation, then to speak is to be. Understanding
something, we say we can make sense of it, and now it is clear that this
making sense is not theoretical, but is primarily aesthetic, concrete, and
sensuous.” It is the function of beauty to awaken us to the spiritually
embodied realization of Presence:“When imagination and renunciation
are wed, then all the world becomes sensuous and my individual world,
my life, can make sense to me. The spiritual world is no longer abstract
and distant, but alive and intensely real.” Cheetham laments, “The true
meaning of the word substance has faded from our consciousness.The
spirit is substantial. Understanding this can help reclaim a sense of the
concrete significance of the individual.”
In the second and third volumes of the Corbin trilogy, in particular,
Cheetham considers Corbin’s ideas and their significance in providing
a critique of modernism.The defining characteristic of modernism is its
loss of a cosmological sense of wholeness, of a hierarchical continuum
poetic sensibility. The function of poeisis is, in this regard, to unveil for
us the reality of that personified and qualitative and sensate Presence
through language that is both concrete and resonant of transcendence.
Cheetham views poets, therefore, as “the guardians of the person and
of the soul of the world,” both inextricably linked so that “a violation of
either is a violation of both.” He contrasts poets with scientists.While the
latter would leave no room for mystery and wonder in their quest for
abstract and literal Truth, Cheetham says this about poets: “They speak
to us out of intimacy.They are the guardians of the inviolate individual,
of the mystery of the Person.” But the responsibility to perform as po‑
ets rests with each of us, and it is a heavy responsibility for to lose our
poetic sensibility would be to deface the soul and the world: “To the
degree that the language of the imagination is lost, to that degree are
people and all the elements of Creation de-personalized, turned into
objects, into abstractions. The final result is Hell. The final result is a
world without a Face.”
Cheetham is wary at times of Corbin’s mysticism, of his “nostalgia
for the Elsewhere and his desire for the Body of Light.” He prefers a
more grounded counterpoint to his views. For this “coagulating” coun‑
terpoint to Corbin’s “sublimating” tendencies, Cheetham turns to the
polymath thinker, Ivan Illich (1926–2002). He finds in Illich’s ideas a
complementary but more developed sense of meaning and Presence
that opens up a way into the Beyond through the deepest reality of the
present. He discusses Illich’s dislike for the depersonalizing influences
of institutions—including the Church—and of secularism in society, and
his critique of Western culture’s attempts to (in Cheetham’s language)
“institutionalize grace and the call that is implicit in the divine face of
the other person.” For Illich, the Incarnation is central to Christian rev‑
elation. It represents the possibility of a profound continuity between
“the eyes of the flesh” and the “eyes of fire” that forms the condition
of the “ethical gaze.” Illich explores the medieval connections between
optics and ethics, the view that how we discipline our seeing through
ascesis can condition how we see. We need to look with eyes of inner
light (or lumen), rather than be passive recipients of the light of exter‑
nal vision (lux). The secularization of images occurs through the loss
of inner light or “in-sight”, and this has profound implications for moral
conduct, leading to the “secularization of the Samaritan” and an outlook