Marine Seismic

An overview of marine seismic operations
Report No. 448

April 2011
International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

P ublications
Global experience
The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical
knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different
terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines
for good practice by individual members.
Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best prac-
tice throughout the world.
The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consist-
ent databases and records in certain fields. The OGP’s members are encouraged to use the
guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and
regulations which may apply locally.
Internationally recognised source of industry information

Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and
safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government
organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies.
Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication,
neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless
of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which
liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use
by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform
any subsequent recipient of such terms.
Copyright notice
The contents of these pages are © The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission
is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii) the
source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved.” Any other use requires the prior written permis-
sion of the OGP.
These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Eng-
land and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of
England and Wales.
Report No: 448

April 2011
Table of contents
1 Introduction and underlying principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Some wave propagation fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 Towed marine seismic methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1 Towed streamer 2D acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2 Site surveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3 Towed streamer 3D acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4 Advanced acquisition techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.1 Multi-azimuth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
4.2 Wide azimuth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
5 Ocean bottom seismic techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.1 Four-Component (4C) data acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2 Two-Component (2C) data acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.3 Autonomous nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.4 Permanent seismic installations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6 Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7 Shallow water/Transition Zone (TZ) acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8 The seismic source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
8.1 Basic operation of an airgun seismic source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
8.2 Marine vibrators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
9 The seismic streamer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
10 Ancillary equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
11 Operational performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4 © OGP
1 Introduction and underlying principles
In seismic surveying, sound waves are mechanically generated and sent into the earth (Figure 1).
Some of this energy is reflected back to recording sensors, measuring devices that record accurately
the strength of this energy and the time it has taken for this energy to travel through the various
layers in the earth’s crust and back to the locations of the sensors. These recordings are then taken
and, using specialised seismic data processing, are transformed into visual images of the subsurface
of the earth in the seismic survey area. Just as doctors use x-rays and audio- or sonograms to “see”
into the human body indirectly, geoscientists use seismic surveying to obtain a picture of the struc-
ture and nature of the rock layers indirectly.
Figure 1 (credit: Jack Caldwell)
All marine seismic surveys involve a source (S) and some kind of array or receiver sensors (individual
receiver packages are indicated by the black dots). ‘1’ illustrates the towed streamer geometry, ‘2’ an
ocean bottom geometry, ‘3’ a buried seafloor array (note that multiple parallel receiver cables are subtly
displayed), and ‘4’ a VSP (vertical seismic profile) geometry, where the receivers are positioned in a well.
Seismic surveys are conducted for a variety of reasons. They are used to check foundations for roads,
buildings and large structures, such as bridges. They can help detect groundwater. They can be used
to assess where coal and minerals are located. One of the most common uses of seismic data is in con-
nection with the exploration, development, and production of oil & gas reserves to map potential
and known hydrocarbon-bearing formations and the geologic structures that surround them. Most
commercial seismic surveying is conducted for this purpose. Oil & gas exploration and produc-
tion is conducted in many places on the earth’s surface, in both the onshore (land) and offshore
(marine) domains. Although the principles are identical, the operational details differ between the
two domains. In this overview, only marine operations will be addressed.
All seismic surveys involve a source and some configuration of receivers or sensors. Surveys may be
differentiated on the basis of
1. the geometry of the receiver system;
2. the density of measurements made over a given area; and
3. the type of sensor used.
Figure 1 illustrates the different receiver geometries used in marine seismic surveying, while Figure
2 provides a list of the different types of surveys. Towed streamer operations represent the most
significant commercial activity, followed by ocean bottom seismic (including arrays placed on the
seafloor and arrays buried a metre or so below the seafloor). Shallow water/transition zone seismic is
a complex seismic operation as it is undertaken in shallow water areas such as tidal zones, river estu-
aries, marshes and swamplands. Vertical seismic profiling is an additional category of seismic survey
where the receivers are placed in one or more well holes and a source is hung off the well platform, or
deployed using a source vessel.
© OGP 1
Figure 2 (credit: Jack Caldwell & Chris Walker)

This table summarises the majority of the different types of marine seismic surveys, and it sug-
gests that there are quite a few varieties of survey used by the oil & gas industry.
Seismic surveys may also be differentiated by the density of the measurements made over a given
area; 3D surveys have a much denser number of measurements than 2D surveys. There are also sur-
veys that are acquired repeatedly over the same area, the duration between surveys being on the
order of months or years. These are known as 4D surveys or time-lapse surveys, and hence the data
density is higher over the same area, over a period of time because there are multiple data points
over the same location. In general, 4D data density per unit area is higher than 3D, which in turn is
higher than 2D.
Finally, surveys can be differentiated by the type of sensor that is used. In most marine work, the
sensor is a hydrophone that detects the pressure fluctuations in the water caused by the reflected
sound waves. The cable containing the hydrophones, called a streamer, is towed or ‘streamed’ behind
a moving vessel. These streamers are typically 3 to 8 kilometres long, although they can be up to
12 kilometres long depending on the depth of the geophysical target being investigated. In ocean
bottom surveys, typically the receiver system will have a hydrophone and a 3-component geophone
at each receiver station and the data are processed either as 2-component data, or 4-component data.
This ‘component’ concept will be discussed in the next section.
2 © OGP
2 Some wave propagation fundamentals
There are a couple of fundamentals about wave propagation that will be important in order to
understand a few topics that will be addressed later in this paper. When energy from a sound source
is released in the marine environment, pressure waves are created in the water column. The magni-
tude of the pressure is called ‘amplitude’, and the excited waves are P-waves, or compressional waves.
To a first approximation, water will only propagate P-waves and the sensors that make accurate
measurements of the amplitudes of P-waves are hydrophones. The velocity of sound in seawater and
density of seawater can vary as a result of changes in salinity, temperature, and gas and sediment
content. under certain hydrohgrapic conditions layers can be formed that can reflect P-waves, and
that can also trap certain frequencies of P-waves. In this latter case, the trapping layer will be called
a waveguide. Although the terms amplitude (pressure) and energy are often used interchangeably (as
in ‘the P-wave pressure, or the P-wave energy’), energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude.
Rocks underlying the seafloor have rigidity: water does not. When P-waves enter the rock, they
can be transmitted and reflected as in water, but they can also convert to S-waves or shear-waves. It
is impossible for P-waves to propagate in rocks without mode-converting (converting from P-wave
mode to S-wave mode) to S-waves, but most seismic surveying is accomplished using pressure sensors
in the water column, so no direct S-waves are recorded in that situation. However, S-waves contain
information of use to geoscientists that is not contained in P-waves, so sometimes it is advantageous
to record S-waves. This can be done by placing sensors on the seafloor and catching the S – wave
energy that has been created by the initial production of P-waves from the marine source.
Figure 3 (credit: Jack Caldwell)

Some downgoing P-waves are mode-converted to upgoing S-waves. The S-waves can be
recorded by special sensors placed on the ocean bottom. The sensors include a hydrophone (P)
and 3-component geophones (Z, X, Y). The ‘ghost’ path that is taken by energy that propagates
upwards from the source and is almost completely reflected at the air-sea surface interface.
The sensors used on the seafloor typically comprise hydrophones, and 3-component geophones. A
hydrophone measures only pressure and most do not measure the direction from which a pressure
pulse arrives. Geophones measure ground motion and therefore the direction from which P-waves
and S-waves arrive. Using three geophone components aligned in orthogonal directions; the vertical
direction, the horizontal direction, and the other horizontal direction that is at right-angles to the
first one (generally denoted as Z, X, and Y)measurements can be made in each of the three dimen-
sions of space. Figure 3 illustrates these basic concepts and lays the groundwork for the discussion of
ocean bottom surveys.
© OGP 3
Figure 4 (credit: Jack Caldwell) As energy propagates away from a source, several processes
act on it. It diminishes due to friction in the earth, this pro-
cess is termed absorption. Its frequency content decreases as
absorption varies with increasing frequency. The largest effect
is termed geometrical spreading. This is the process by which,
if energy truly were conserved, the amount of energy per unit
area becomes less since the area it is being spread over is get-
ting larger and larger as the pulse propagates away from the
source. This is analogous to a ripple effect on the water surface
following a stone being dropped in the water. There are two
simplified models of geometrical spreading, neither of which
is a completely accurate way to model the process due to the
numerous interactions between a moving energy wave and its
surrounding environment. They are however relatively simple
to understand and commonly used to correct received data
crudely during data processing. The two models are known as
Spherical spreading
spherical spreading and cylindrical spreading (refer to figure
The area of a sphere is 4/3πr², so the area increases at the same rate as r²
4). The former applies reasonably well to deep water; the latter
increases. The amount of energy is constant, hence it diminishes per unit area
at the same rate as the area increases, which is proportional then to l/r2. Energy less accurately to shallow water. There is also the special situ-
is the square of the amplitude, hence amplitude (or pressure) decreases as l/r. ation when a waveguide exists, allowing amplitudes to propa-
gate with less loss than either of the geometrical models would
suggest. One main point to understand is that amplitudes
diminish with distance from a source, and in general, they fall
off slightly faster than either of these two models might sug-
gest. The other main point to understand is that the resolution
of the images able to be produced from seismic data decreases
as the energy propagates away from the source, because it is
getting weaker and because the total frequency bandwidth is
getting smaller.
The ‘source ghost’ is created by the pressure pulse which leaves
Cylindrical spreading the marine seismic source in an upward direction, and is almost
The area of a cylinder is 2πrh and, in this case with h constant, the perfectly reflected at the interface between the sea surface and
area increases at the same rate as r increases. The amount of energy
is constant, hence it dimishes per unit area at the same rate as the the air (see Figure 3). It is delayed from the down-going pulse
area increases, which is proportional then to l/r. Energy is the square by the time it takes to travel from the source depth to the
of the amplitude, hence amplitude (or pressure) decreases as l/√r surface and back down to the same depth, about 10 millisec-
onds, which is about the time duration of the initial pulse. The
amplitude of this ‘ghost” is the same magnitude, but opposite
in sign, from the initial down-going pulse. What this effec-
tively does is double the amplitude of the initial pulse, because
it ends up coming so close after the initial pulse that the two
look like one right after the other, the first with a pressure (or
amplitude) of +A and the second with a pressure of –A. The
total pressure excursion therefore goes from zero to +A to zero
to –A, so the total pressure pulse is 2A. As well as essentially
doubling the amplitude of the pulse, this process also causes
the removal of a certain frequency band (ghost notch effect) of
the pressure pulse, with more and more low frequencies being
removed as the source depth is increased. This dictates the
operational situation of not towing the source any deeper than
a few metres. (The same thing occurs at the receiver as well,
as a pressure pulse arrives from below the streamer and the
pulse continues on up to the sea surface and again is perfectly
reflected, with the opposite amplitude. Again, to prevent loss
of too much of the low frequency pressure, it is desirable not to
tow the streamer deeper than a few metres.)
4 © OGP
3 Towed marine seismic methods
Within a given exploration zone, the details of a specific survey operation can vary enormously.
There are, however, two principal categories of seismic surveying. These are two-dimensional (2D)
seismic surveys and three-dimensional (3D) seismic surveys. 2D can be described as a fairly basic
survey method, which, although somewhat simplistic in its underlying assumptions, has been and
still is used very effectively to find oil & gas. A sub-category of 2D is the site survey where ultra-high
resolution data is acquired in the immediate vicinity of an intended well to identify both seabed and
shallow subsurface hazards. Ultra-high resolution here means that the survey is intended to provide
more detailed information about the seafloor and the conditions of the rock down to a depth of a
few hundred metres beneath the seafloor. 3D surveying is a more complex method of seismic sur-
veying than 2D and involves greater investment and much more sophisticated equipment than 2D
surveying. Until the beginning of the 1980s, 2D work dominated in oil & gas exploration, but 3D
became the dominant survey technique in the late 80s with the introduction of improved streamer
towing and positioning technologies. 4D surveys (or time-lapse 3D) are simply 3D surveys which
are repeated over the same area, some period of time elapsing between the initial survey and the sub-
sequent surveys. There might be several repeated surveys, depending on the specific oil or gas field
in question. The purpose of this type of survey is to obtain images of how the hydrocarbon reservoir
is changing over time due to production in order to maximize hydrocarbon recovery from the field.
4D surveys have become increasingly used since the mid-1990s, and now represent a significant per-
centage of overall seismic activity. More recently, increasingly sophisticated towed streamer acquisi-
tion schemes – multi-azimuth, wide azimuth and rich azimuth – have been developed to provide
improved subsurface imaging in geologically and geophysically challenging environments.
3.1 Towed streamer 2D acquisition

In 2D operations, a single seismic cable or streamer is towed behind the survey vessel together with a
single sound source (the specifics of both streamers and sources will be given in sections 8 and 9). The
reflections from the subsurface are assumed to lie directly below the sail line that the survey vessel
moves along, providing an image in two dimensions (horizontal and vertical) – hence the name
‘2D’. The processing of the measurements recorded by the streamer sensors is, by the nature of the
method, less sophisticated than that employed
for 3D and 4D surveys. 2D data acquisition
lines are typically acquired several kilome-
tres apart (see Figure 5) on a relatively sparsely
spaced grid of lines and usually over a large area.
This method is generally used today in frontier
exploration areas to produce a general under-
standing of the area’s geological structure before
drilling is undertaken.
It is worth noting that due to the action of tides
and currents, the seismic streamer does not
normally tow directly behind the survey vessel
but deviates laterally from the ship track or Figure 5 (credit: Jack Caldwell & Chris Walker)
nominal sail line. This is referred to as ‘streamer This illustrates the basic difference between the 2D survey geometry and
feathering’ (Figure 6), and whilst such lateral the 3D survey geometry. The dashed lines suggest subsurface structure
displacements are not typically crucial to the contour lines, indicating that the area covered by each of the two survey
geometries is the same. The spacing between adjacent ship tracks for 2D
success of 2D surveys, they are important in 3D will typically be 1km or greater. While the distance between ship tracks for
and critically so for 4D surveys. Such detailed 3D will depend on several factors, such as the number of airgun arrays being
knowledge and repetition of the positions of used (typically two) and the number of streamers being towed, the intent
both sources and receivers is fundamental to the of 3D is to have the distance between the streamers be on the order of
25-75 meters. When one figures where the subsurface image points occur,
successful application of the 4D technique. A the data density will be 15 to 20 times greater in the left-to-right dimension
typical 2D survey is illustrated in Figure 5; the than for 2D. The data density in what is the up-and-down dimension of this
2D lines are shown as a grid. From each of the figure will be the same (or about the same) for the two types of survey.
© OGP 5
2D lines, sub-surface geologic horizons are identified, posi-

tioned and contoured by the interpreter. The weakness in
the 2D method lies in the gaps in knowledge caused by the
large spacing between the grid lines. Typically the lines are
not much closer than one or two kilometres, so interpreting
the sub-surface between these sample locations can prove
problematic, and can be very inaccurate. 3D data, which
have a much closer spacing of the grid lines, removes much
of this uncertainty and/or error.
Figure 6 – feathering (credit: Chris Walker)
3.2 Site surveys

Before a well is drilled, there is both a legal and operational
need to have detailed information about the seabed in the
area immediately surrounding the well location and the geo-
logical layers immediately below the subsurface. The infor-
mation about the nature of the seabed is needed to ensure
that the drilling equipment – or related equipment such as
anchors – will not encounter any problems when they are
emplaced, and that the seafloor will provide the necessary
stability for such equipment. This information is also used
to help the drillers anticipate the condition of the rock into
which the well is spud and how the initial drilling will be
accomplished. If the well is successful, this information will
Figure 7a (credit: EdgeTech)
also be needed for all subsequent structures that will be
View of a side scan sonar system – the tow ‘‘fish’ and shipboard control unit.
installed to accomplish production from the location of that
well, or nearby wells. The near subsurface data are needed to
ensure that there are no unforeseen hazards such as shallow
gas pockets or buried river channels that could have cata-
strophic effects if penetrated during the drilling process.
The sudden release of gas below a drill rig has caused the
loss of the entire rig in the past, with consequent loss of life.
The resolution of data from conventional 2D or 3D seismic
surveys is not sufficient for these purposes and therefore a
high resolution or site survey is undertaken. This technique
is simalar to conventional 2D marine, except for the source
used. Generally a small volume compressed air seismic
source is used, typically 40 to 400 cubic inches. Alterna-
tively, a ‘sparker’, a device that generates an acoustic pulse
from an electrical discharge, is used. The receiver streamer is
much shorter compared with conventional marine seismic
methods; between 600 and 1,200 metres due to the shal-
low depth of the target geology. The source and streamer
Figure 7b – Side scan sonar image of the sea bed (credit: Fugro Survey) are also towed at a depth of only two or three metres, cor-
responding to the much shallower depth of investigation.
6 © OGP
The shallow tow depth allows higher frequency or higher resolution data to be generated, but limits
operations to very good weather conditions. Survey durations are usually on the order of four or five
days. Other equipment may be deployed from the survey vessel during the course of the site survey.
This may include side-scan sonar (Figures 7a and 7b) to determine the texture, topography and char-
acter of the seabed sediments and to detect debris such as boulders, outcrops, pipelines, wellheads
and other equipment lying on, attached to, or shallowly buried beneath the seafloor. A ‘boomer’
which employs an electro-mechanical system to generate a low-power, high frequency acoustic pulse
is used to provide a higher resolution image of the very near surface sedimentary layers. Increasingly,
a ‘chirp profiler’ – essentially a small-scale marine vibrator (see section 8.2) – is replacing boomers
as it produces a more consistent input acoustic signal. Multibeam echosounders are also commonly
used to create densely-sampled digital terrain models that can be used to further define topography
and assist in the oilfield development phase when planning the location of wellheads, platforms,
pipelines, etc. Seafloor coring is also carried out to determine the seabed conditions. Operating fre-
quencies of side scan sonar systems vary according to manufacturer and application but are in the
range 60-400 kHz, with acoustic output sound pressure levels on the order of 220dB re 1 μPa at 1m
(GeoAcoustics Model 196 transducer).
3.3 Towed streamer 3D acquisition

A 3D survey covers a specific area, generally with known geological targets, that have been identified
by previous 2D exploration (Figure 5). Prior to the survey, careful planning will have been under-
taken to ensure that the survey area is precisely defined. Since time, money and effort will be put into
the acquisition, processing and interpretation of the survey, it is very important that it is designed to
achieve the survey objectives. The result of the detailed planning will be a map defining the survey
boundaries and the direction of the survey lines. Specific acquisition parametres such as energy
source effort and receiver station intervals, together with the data recording or ‘listening’ time, will
also be defined. In 3D surveying, groups of sail lines (or swaths) are acquired with the same orienta-
tion, unlike 2D where there is typically a requirement for
the lines to be acquired in an orthogonal direction relative
to the dominant structural grain. Simplistically, 3D acquisi-
tion is the acquisition of many 2D lines closely spaced over
the area.
The 3D sail line separation is normally in the order of 400 to
800 metres, depending on the number of streamers deployed
and their cross-line separation. By utilising more than one
source and many streamers from the same survey vessel, the
acquisition of many closely spaced, sub-surface 2D lines,
typically between 25 and 50 metres apart, can be achieved
by a single sail line. A 3D survey is therefore much more
efficient, in that many times more data are generated than
for 2D per survey vessel sail line . The size of a 3D survey
is usually referred to in square metrekilometrekilometres or
sometimes the number of line kilometres acquired. A small
3D survey size is on the order of 300 square kilometres, or
1,000 sail line kilometres, or 12,000 sub-surface 2D kilo-
metres. A larger 3D survey may cover 1,000 to 3,000 square
kilometres.
3D surveys are typically acquired as shown in Figure 8, with
a ‘racetrack’ pattern being employed. This allows, adjacent
sail lines to be recorded in the same direction (swath), whilst Figure 8 (credit: Jack Caldwell & Chris Walker)
reducing the time necessary to turn the vessel in the opposite 3D survey ‘racetrack’ pattern of how the survey is acquired. Each line
represents a ship’s track line, so the vessel tracks down one line, skips
direction. A seismic vessels may be of the order of 100 metres
over several soon-to-be-shot lines and tracks back up another line.
© OGP 7
long and 30 metres wide and are towing several kilometres of streamers behind them, it takes a large
area for them to make a turn. This increases the efficiency of acquiring the data and minimises pro-
cessing artifactsthat could adversely affect the interpretation of the data. With the number of sail
line kilometres involved, 3D surveys can take many months to complete. The way in which the data
are acquired greatly affects the efficiency of the acquisition and considerable planning goes into this
aspect. Whilst a ‘racetrack’ approach is commonly used, size and shape of the survey, obstructions,
tides, wind, weather, fishing vessels and client specifications, amongst others, will clearly affect the
efficiency of the operation. Usually, a survey is broken into areas and swaths of lines are completed
in phases or individual groups of ‘racetracks’, but there is no rigid procedure which is followed by all
surveys and all areas.
Powerful computers are required to process the large volume of data acquired and to produce a
three-dimensional or 3D image of the subsurface – hence the term 3D seismic. 3D surveys have
now become the preferred method for providing the geoscientist with subsurface information and
account for more than 90% of marine seismic data acquired worldwide. 3D surveys are used in
all phases of hydrocarbon exploitation from identifying geological structures which are considered
likely to contain hydrocarbons (Exploration 3D) to, in areas of established production, delineating
those portions of the reservoir which are not being drained by existing wells (Production 3D). As
noted above, repeat 3D surveys – 4D - are being used regularly on established fields to monitor the
production from the field: so-called ‘Time Lapse’ surveys.
3.3.1 Multi-streamer operations

In 1984, the first twin streamer operation was undertaken, which effectively doubled the data acqui-
sition efficiency of the vessel by generating two subsurface lines per vessel sail line. By moving to
twin source/twin streamer configurations in 1985, the output was increased to four subsurface lines
per vessel sail line or pass. The next logical step of towing three streamers and two sources behind a
single vessel, thus acquiring six lines per pass, was achieved in 1990. The number of deployed stream-
ers has consistently increased with as many as 16 streamers having been towed. A schematic diagram
of a typical eight streamer/dual source operation is shown in Figure 9. The heavy lines represent the
streamers. The small circles represent the sources. Obviously each streamer and source are attached
to the vessel, but for clarity, the towing links are not shown. The dashed lines represent the subsur-
face lines or Common Mid Point (CMP) lines that are derived from data being recorded by the
streamers. These lines indicate the loci of points that are located halfway between the source and
Figure 9 – schematic diagram of an 8-streamer, dual-source operation (credit: Chris Walker)

The solid lines represent the streamers and the dashed lines represent the loci of points where the reflections originate in the subsurface. If
this were a single source operation, the width of the subsurface covered would be half the total distance between the two outside stream-
ers. Because dual sources are used, the subsurface width covered is 4/7 of the total distance between the outside streamers.
8 © OGP
hydrophone receivers positioned along any one of the streamers. These are the theoretical reflection
points between the source and the streamers, and their theoretical locations will not be too far from
the actual reflection points if the geologic structure is flat or not too complicated. If the structure
is complicated, then more advanced processing is required to obtain an accurate picture of the sub-
surface. When the port source energy is released, CMP lines 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 are produced
from the streamers. Similarly the starboard source produces CMP lines 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16.
The number of CMP lines achieved in a single vessel pass is a measure of the efficiency of a particular
survey towing configuration.
Multi-streamer operations require a significant amount of in-sea equipment – the 16-streamer
operation referred to above entailed 72 kilometres of cable being towed behind the vessel. –
Consequently,the back deck of the vessel becomes very busy due to the activity involved in handling
equipment including streamers, sources and the related control devices. Organising and operating
such a set-up in a safe and efficient manner requires a very high level of knowledge and skill.
3.3.2 Undershooting
One of the more common problems associated with seismic data acquisition is the location of sur-
face obstructions in the survey area. These are usually man-made, such as drilling rigs or production
facilities In addition, natural obstacles such as sandbanks also present quite serious impediments to
the survey process. A more specialised problem arises where there are complex subsurface geological
structures such as salt domes. Because of the way the seismic energy travels into the rock layers and
back to the surface, in the vicinity of these complicated features reflected energy can be missed using
‘normal’ towed seismic geometries as the receivers are not in the right position to detect the return-
ing energy. Some deep geological interfaces under complex structures may end up being poorly sam-
pled or not sampled at all. Undershooting is the technique used to image the sub-surface beneath
obstructions, and is one of the techniques used to better image in areas of complex geology.
Figure 10 illustrates a two-vessel operation. One vessel acts as the streamer and recording vessel
and the other provides the source energy from two independent units. Note that the streamers are
long, 3 to 12 kilometres in length. The deployment of the sources from a separate vessel gives greater
versatility when it comes to avoiding obstructions. Typically,
the recording vessel will sail on one side of the obstacle and
the source vessel the other. The subsurface CMP lines will
lie between the two vessels and under the obstructed area,
hence the name ‘undershooting’. In theory, the vessels can be
separated by a long distance, but in practice, the separations
are kept as short as possible in such situations. The reason for
this is that if the source and receivers are too far apart, there
will be very few short offsets (offset is the individual source-
to-receiver distance) in the CMP offset distribution and this
results in a poor sampling of the shallow subsurface inter-
faces. This set-up is not only used for avoiding obstructions,
but also to achieve an optimum distribution of offsets. With
careful planning, it can just as easily be employed to avoid
the salt dome sampling problems mentioned earlier. Note
that where there is more than one streamer towing vessel, Figure 10 – Triple streamer, dual source under-
shoot geometry (credit: Chris Walker)
the separation between the streamers and sources has to be
The solid lines indicate the streamers and the dashed lines indicate the CMP
controlled very precisely to maintain regular surface offsets lines. Towing long streamers (up to 8km) around obstructions requires
between all the stations recorded for each shotthereby pro- skill and experience from both the maritime crew and the seismic crew on
viding the accurate subsurface coverage that is required. board the vessel. This is true whether it’s a one- or two-vessel situation.
© OGP 9
3.3.3 3D seismic survey vessel

The key elements or areas of a typical marine 3D seismic survey vessel (shown in Figure 11) are out-
lined below.
Figure 11 – Two currently operated seismic vessels (credit: CGGVertias and Western Geco)
The lines coming off the stern of each vessel are associated with the towing equipment for the streamers. The deck just below
the deck from where the streamer towing equipment eminates is the gun deck. The yellow circle with the ‘H’ in the centre
is the helipad, used for ferrying the crew and other personnel to and from the vessel when it is at sea.
Instrument room
This is where the main seismic instrumentation is located and operated. The position of the instru-
ment room varies from vessel to vessel but is normally located centrally, somewhere below the bridge
and forward of the back deck. It contains the main seismic instruments for recording seismic data
and controlling the seismic streamer(s) and activating the energy source. The electronics associated
with the main navigation system is also here with its links to satellite, radio systems, compasses
and the various positioning control and monitoring systems. There is usually a working area for
instrument testing and repair. Computers used for the onboard seismic and positioning data quality
checking and processing are also located in this area.
Back deck
Although ship to ship designs will vary, the back deck is used for storage, deployment and retrieval
of the towed seismic equipment. The seismic streamers are stored here on large reels and when acqui-
sition is in progress, the streamers are deployed from the back of the vessel and towed directly behind
and/or to the sides of the vessel. The number of streamers varies depending on the vessel design and
capability. All the wiring from the streamers is fed through watertight connections to the instru-
ment room. Most vessels have a small streamer repair area on the back deck. The seismic streamers
are under control of the observer department of the seismic crew.
The back deck is also the location of the energy source equipment. The energy source usually com-
prises a number of source elements called air guns, which are supplied with high-pressure air. A
marine seismic source is made up of an array of many different sized source elements, linked together
with special harnesses, air supply lines and electronic control cables. When not in use, these cables
are stored on reels usually at the forward and of the back deck. During deployment, they enter the
sea through a slipway at the rear of the deck. The air feed from the vessel compressors to the arrays
is monitored from a control panel housed in a small work shack where gun repairs can also be done.
The towing equipment is a complex, carefully designed arrangement of specialised equipment that
enables the multiple streamers and source arrays to be positioned accurately behind the vessel, and
depending on the survey design, allows for different source and streamer separation distances. The
crossline streamer separation is the distance between streamers, perpendicular to the direction of
movement of the vessel, which results in tremendous pulling forces which the towing system must
withstand in variable weather conditions. It can take several hours or days to deploy or retrieve all
the equipment. Maintenance of the source and towing equipment systems are the main responsibili-
ties of the mechanical department of the seismic crew.
10 © OGP
Finally, the navigation or positioning in-sea hardware equipment is also stored on the back deck.
This usually involves buoy systems containing navigation instruments. Tail buoys are attached to
the ‘tail’ end of each of the streamers furthest from the vessel. Additional navigation buoys are some-
times attached to the source arrays (flotation buoys are attached to the front ends of the streamers).
In complex multi-streamer/source vessel arrangements, the navigators need a great deal of other con-
trol and monitoring systems on sources, streamers and any other vessels.
Compressor room
This contains the compressor engines and compressors, which supply high pressure air to the source
arrays. The compressors are capable of recharging the individual source elements rapidly and repeat-
edly, which enables the source array to be activated, typically every ten seconds or so during acquisi-
tion of data and for periods of up to 12 hours or more, depending on the length of the sail line. This
room is under the control of the mechanics and is usually situated near the back deck.
3.3.4 Operations
The basics
The first stage of normal operations (commonly called mobilisation) is supplying the ship being with
all necessary fuel, water, food, seismic equipment and crew. It will then sail to the designated survey
area. The vessel will have been provided in advance with all necessary details regarding the survey
layout and design, and what and how much equipment will be deployed. The navigators will have
information, specifying where each data acquisition sail line must start and finish, and the location
of each source or shot point. This information will have been fed into the onboard integrated naviga-
tion system. On the bridge, the captain will ensure that while the ship is under normal manual con-
trol, he will be navigating as agreed to the first line-start position. He and the seismic crew (party)
manager will be closely monitoring wind, weather conditions and any incoming reports.
As the survey area is approached, the observers will deploy the streamers, attaching depth monitor-
ing and control devices (birds) at regular spacings as they go. As sea water temperature and salinity
vary by location, considerable care is taken to ensure that the streamers are correctly “ballasted”,
to be neutrally buoyant for the chosen operating depth for the specific survey area. Ballasting is
accomplished by ensuring that the upward lift of the positively buoyant streamer is exactly coun-
terbalanced by the weight of the streamer electronic module, stress members, external devices and,
if necessary, externally attached weights. The mechanics will start the compressors and prepare and
check the source arrays, which are deployed after the streamers, but can later be recovered and re-
deployed when necessary. The navigators will work with the mechanics and observers to attach the
necessary buoys for positioning.
In the instrument room, positioning of all in-sea equipment will be verified and all equipment will
be powered up, tested and checked for trouble free operation. Test records for background noise will
be made. The streamer, source and buoy links will all be tested, and the whole system confirmed
ready for use. As the ship approaches the start of a pre-defined sail line, it is said to be on the run-in.
This is the stage where it is very close to the agreed start position, the vessel has the correct head-
ing and the streamers are as much in line behind the vessel as conditions will allow. Now the ship
is steered according to the input from the navigation system. Around the vessel, all involved crew
members will be monitoring the ship’s position from information screens in their respective areas.
The navigator monitors the approach to start of line in terms of distance to go, heading and speed to
ensure that no positioning problems arise at the last moment. The mechanics will be closely watch-
ing the compressor monitors and will make a last minute visual inspection of the source equipment
that can be seen from the vessel. The observers will take any final test records for future reference,
and will check the source control system.
Depending on the country of operations and the area-specific environmental controls in place, a
visual watch for marine mammals from the vessel may be ongoing for at least 30 to 60 minutes
before the source is first activated. On some surveys, dedicated acoustic monitoring methods may
© OGP 11
additionally be utilised to identify the presence of marine mammals within the vicinity of the source
array. It is only when the crew has been informed that no marine mammals are present that the
source can be activated and data acquisition can proceed.
The source is activated at the first predetermined position and data acquisition commences recorded.
This process is repeated at successive regularly spaced distance intervals, (with the source firing every
10 to 12 seconds)depending on vessel speed as determined by the navigation system. This process is
repeated until the vessel has reached the pre-defined end of the sail line. Throughout the recording
period, all personnel involved perform detailed prescribed tasks. The navigator monitors the posi-
tioning system output, checking for any discrepancies, and completes the end of line paperwork and
prepares plans for the line change (relocating of vessel to the next sail line). The mechanic monitors
the compressor performance, checks the backdeck towing systems, and is ready to deal with any
‘mechnical’ problems. The observer monitors the data recording system operation, changes record-
ing media (typically high density tape decks), and fills in the line log as the line progresses.
When the line is complete, all systems stop recording. The ship is now in line-change mode. The
navigator has planned how the vessel should manoeuvre to start the run-in for the next line. The
line-change time varies according to the layout of the survey and the configuration of the equip-
ment, but is usually between one and three hours. During the changeover period, all of the crew
involved work quickly to resolve any problems and make modifications or repairs in readiness for
the next line. The run-in is then started, all equipment is readied, the sources activated, and the
activity cycle is repeated. Infrequently, technical failures occur and line-starts are delayed or lines
are terminated early. Operations may also be affected by weather, and oceanographic conditions or
adjacent shipping.
Weather
In general, seismic surveys are planned to be acquired in calm weather, to minimise the amount of
extraneous noise recorded along with the primary signals. This noise increases with increasing sea
state and most companies specify how much measured noise is acceptable during the acquisition of
the data. If the prevailing conditions lead to this level being exceeded, the acquisition is stopped. If
conditions become excessive, then the streamers and source arrays may have to be recovered. The
vessel will ‘ride out the storm’ on location or move to more sheltered waters, whichever is the safer
and better operational option; the vessel crew’s safety being the overriding concern.
Shipping
If the survey is in an area of high shipping activity, seismic operations can be difficult. A seismic
survey vessel is limited in its manoeuvrability because of the long streamers (generally several kilo-
metres, with a maximum length currently of approximately 12 kilometres) deployed from the stern.
The main vessel itself is in little danger, but with many vessels in close proximity, the streamers may
be fouled or cut. Aside from the large financial loss from the value of the streamers themselves, this
can mean reduced revenues through disrupted operations. In difficult areas, chase or guard boats are
employed. These are smaller vessels, usually ex-fishing boats, which contact potentially threatening
shipping traffic and direct them away from possible contact with the streamers.
Currents, water depth and obstructions

The survey vessel is sometimes required to operate in areas of strong currents; shallow water such as
over sandbanks, or in the vicinity of obstructions such as oil platforms. These may, in many cases,
cause problems and affect the rate or quality of data acquisition due to the limited manoeuvring abil-
ity of the vessel. Careful planning can mitigate these problems to some extent in some areas, but the
ability of the survey vessel to acquire data efficiently will be severely hampered.
12 © OGP
4 Advanced acquisition techniques
Increasingly complex acquisition geometries have recently been employed to acquire 3D towed-
streamer data in areas where the data quality obtained from conventional towed streamer acquisition
has been insufficient for cost-effective field development. The methods, summarised below, provide
an increased range of horizontal directions, or azimuths, from which data are acquired which ,when
combined, provide an improved signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting seismic data. This is analogous
to taking a photograph of an object from different directions to image all sides of the object.
4.1 Multi-azimuth
In a Multi-AZimuth (MAZ) survey, the increase in azimuth range is achieved by acquiring 3D data
over the same subsurface area with multiple orientations, ie the survey is acquired a number of times
in different directions. In a conventional towed streamer survey, the data are essentially acquired
along a single azimuth so that it can be considered a ‘narrow azimuth’ survey. MAZ obtains a wider
range of azimuths by acquiring overlapping conventional surveys at various azimuths, typically 3 –
6. It is a single vessel, multi-pass technique. The net result of adding the different orientated 3D data
together is an improved combined image of the subsurface.
4.2 Wide azimuth

In this case the increase in azimuthal range is accomplished by acquiring the data over the same
subsurface area using multiple towed streamer/recording and source vessel configuration. Multiple
passes are acquired with increasing lateral separation between the streamer and source vessels to
build up the range of offsets and azimuths. Figure 12 shows a wide-azimuth towed streamer (WATS)
survey example operating four source vessels. By making successive passes over the target, increasing
the offset between the streamers and the source vessels by the width of the streamer spread each time,
a wider range of azimuths and offsets are obtained. WATS is a multi-vessel, multi-pass technique.
Figure 12 – Wide-azimuth towed streamer geometry (credit: WesternGeco)

Schematic illustrating a wide-azimuth configuration using 4 source vessels (left). A photograph of 4 source vessels conducting a wide-
azimuth survey (right). This technique provides better offset (distance between the source and each sensor position in the stream-
ers) distribution as well as a broader range of azumiths. This geometry delivers an improved subsurface geomerty.
© OGP 13
14 © OGP
5 Ocean bottom seismic techniques
There are three principal types of seabed recording systems used in marine seismic: Ocean Bottom
Seismometers (OBS), Two-Component (2C), and Four-Component (4C). Two-component and
four-component data are generally recorded using cables laid on the seabed, although there are sys-
tems which use Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) to deploy and recover sensor nodes (which may
or may not be connected by cables) placed on the seafloor. A geophone measures the velocity of the
particle displacement, an accelerometer, as its name implies, detects the acceleration of the particle
displacement, and a hydrophone detects changes in pressure.
2C data are acquired using a ground motion sensor – historically a geophone, but more recently
an accelerometer – and a hydrophone at each receiver location. 4C uses a three-component ground
motion sensor in addition to a hydrophone. The use of three-component sensors, which detect parti-
cle motion along three mutually perpendicular axes, allows the geophysicist to infer more informa-
tion concerning the subsurface geological layers from which the reflections, and mode conversions,
occur. To date, this has been more useful in producing reservoirs, rather than exploration, where
multi-component techniques have the potential to enhance hydrocarbon recovery. OBS systems his-
torically have been used by university research groups to provide large-scale information for crustal
studies and lithospheric investigation.
5.1 Four-Component (4C) data acquisition

The 4C technique is illustrated in Figure 13. In this instance, the four-component sensors are usu-
ally electrically connected to a recording vessel by means of a cable, which provides power, instru-
ment command and control, and data telemetry of the sensor data to the recording equipment on
the vessel. Several cables are commonly employed to improve operational efficiency, similar to towed
streamer operations. Cable length varies according to survey requirements, but is typically on the
order of 5-6 kilometres per cable, with a 4C sensor usually located every 25 or 50 metres. The record-
ing vessel is equipped with dynamic positioning thrusters to facilitate accurate cable placement and
ease of recovery. Multi-cable operations are generally used for 3D (and 4D) surveys, whilst a single
cable configuration is used for 2D surveys. Recently a buoy-based system has been introduced into
commercial operations: this eliminates the need for a recording vessel. In this system, each 4C cable
is connected to a radio-controlled remote recording buoy.
Figure 13 (credit: Western Geco)
Example of an ocean bottom cable
operation. The bottom cables contain
either 2- or 4-component sensors.
A separate source vessel is used for deployment and operation of the seismic sources, which clearly
increases the cost of 4C surveys compared to towed streamer. There are two principal objectives for
4C surveys: improved imaging of the subsurface and/or increased understanding of reservoir lith-
ologies, both of which rely on the recording of P-waves and mode-converted shear waves (S-waves) by
the geophones on the seabed. Figure 3 illustrates the mode-conversion concept. Energy propagates
down to the target horizon as P-waves and back up to the detector on the seabed as S-waves.
© OGP 15
The physical separation of sources and receivers allows two alternative geometries to be operation-
ally employed: ‘swath’ where the source-lines are parallel to the receiver lines akin to towed streamer
surveys, or ‘patch’ surveys where the source-lines are orthogonal to the receiver lines.
5.2 Two-Component (2C) data acquisition

By using particle motion sensors that measure the particle motion in the vertical axis, and hydro-
phones in combination, it is possible to remove the frequency limiting effects of the sea surface ghost.
This is possible because the particle motion sensor response to upward and downward travelling
reflections has the same polarity, unlike that of a hydrophone. The two component (2C) technique
utilises both particle motion sensors and hydrophones in a combined cable that is deployed from
a cable/recording vessel down to the seabed, just like the 4C technique. Historically, equipment
design limited the depth to which these systems could be deployed to less than 200m, but the more
recent generation of cables are being used in much deeper waters. The techniques employed for 2C
and 4C are broadly the same, although because the 2C method utilises P-wave data rather than P-
and S-wave, less source effort is required due to the asymmetric nature of the PS-wave ray path (see
Figure 3) and shorter record lengths are needed as the P-wave energy travels at roughly twice the
speed of the S-wave.
The 2C technique provides higher resolution than a conventional towed streamer operation due to
the elimination of the ghost notch, but the need to deploy and recover cables to and from the seabed
provides less areal efficiency than modern multi-towed streamer vessels. This has historically limited
the use of the technique to areas where of shallow water depth or there are obstructions such as plat-
forms, or where the use of a deep-water marine vessel is prohibited. However, increasingly in certain
areas like the Middle East, the 2C technique has been extensively used to image specific subsurface
geological features which are poorly imaged using conventional towed-marine data.
16 © OGP
5.3 Autonomous nodes

The use of autonomous nodes for recording data on the sea floor has recently been used commer-
cially. Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are used to deploy and recover the sensor nodes. There
are two types of node systems: those that are connected by cables to each other; and connected to
a recording vessel; and those that have data recording capability built into each node. The cabled
systems have power supplied to each node along the cable and data returned to the recording vessel
along the cable (or perhaps use radio telemetry for data downloading). These systems can stay
deployed for extended periods of time, when the cables (or pigtails to the cables) are attached to a
buoy or platform at the surface. The self-contained nodes have a limited power supply, which needs
to be replaced periodically, and the current maximum time the self-contained nodes can operate
before having to be brought to the surface for data downloading and power supply refreshment is
60 days, now sufficient for most surveys. The nodes are placed on the seabed in a fairly coarse X-Y
grid – typically 400 metres apart – and a conventional source vessel is used to obtain 3D subsurface
coverage (Figure 14).
Layout/retrieval boat
Gun boat
ROV
Subsea loader
Z3000
nodes
Figure 14 – Ocean bottom node acquisition (credit: FairfieldNodal)
© OGP 17
5.4 Permanent seismic installations

A very small number of producing fields has been equipped with permanent seismic systems (figure
15), typically trenched into the first metre or so of the seabed. These are often referred to as Life
of Field Seismic (LoFS) and are used for multiple 4D or timelapse measurements, often at fairly
short (several months) time intervals. One advantage of these permanently installed sensors is that
the cost of the repeat surveys is limited to that of the source vessel only. One disadvantage is the
relatively high initial cost of the permanently installed system. By having a dedicated source vessel,
usually an upgraded oilfield service vessel equipped with a mobile containerised seismic source, the
4D monitor surveys can be conducted very rapidly.
Figure 15 (credit: BP; van Gestel et al. 2008. Continuous seismic surveillance of Valhall Field. TLE 27; 1616-1621)
Example of a permanent seismic installation. The receiver system is permanently emplaced in the ocean
bottom and tied back to the platform for power, control and data transmission.
18 © OGP
6 Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP)
In vertical seismic profiling (VSP), a number of geophones is lowered into a well hole and used to
record data from a seismic source, which can be deployed in a number of ways:
• zero offset VSP – source is deployed from the well platform itself
• offset VSP – source vessel is stationed at a fixed location some distance from the platform
• walkaway VSP – source vessel traverses one or more lines away from the platform, generating a
VSPfor each line traverse.
The main advantage of this technique is that the sound energy only has to travel one way through
the earth. The reflected signal only has to travel a short way from the reflector to reach the down-
hole geophones. This results in higher frequency bandwidth data being recorded, since there is less
absorption of the higher frequency energy due to the shorter ray path lengths, and only one time
through the near-surface, which is where the highest attenuating material is located.
As detailed knowledge of the geological layers penetrated by the well are available from analysing
drill cuttings and down hole logging data. The combination of the higher resolution and the co-
location of the VSP with the well allows the geophysical interpreter to make a very good correlation
between the geology and its corresponding seismic data. Sound source volumes are generally smaller
than for conventional data but larger than for site surveys. The duration of these surveys is typically
short: one or two days at most.
There have been a number of 3D VSPs recorded but these are relatively expensive to acquire. Much
like the dragged array multi-component system, they require many passes of the source vessel to
achieve complete 3D coverage and are therefore relatively expensive, especially when the cost of the
well time is included.
© OGP 19
7 Shallow water/Transition Zone (TZ) acquisition
Shallow water or transition zone (SW / TZ) acquisition is by far the most complex and challenging
area of seismic acquisition. Such areas are, by definition, almost bound to be either highly variable in
their geography or provide some particular operational difficulty for acquiring data. Shallow shelv-
ing waters are the most common problem as they often require small, shallow draft, specialised ves-
sels to move cables, sources, people,and equipment. The rough surf conditions commonly associated
with such areas present some difficult challenges for deployment, retrieval and operation of equip-
ment in the flat-bottomed boat required in such circumstances.
One safety aspect of SW/TZ operation is the use of dynamite as one of the source types employed.
Shallow holes are typically drilled into the seabed, lined with lightweight casing, and loaded with
explosive charges for subsequent detonation. Small airgun arrays are also employed, and it is common
for multiple source types to be employed across an area. Where water is deep enough, it may be pos-
sible to deploy an airgun source from the back of a barge, for example, but where it is shallow, the
use of buried explosives may be required. Providing reliable recording sensors is also problematic.
Marine hydrophone receivers may be used if water depth allows them to operate properly, however
such an operation may not be most efficient in areas prone to tidal water depth variations. An addi-
tional problem involves placing the cable at a reasonable depth in the deeper water. In these environ-
ments, the streamer is not being pulled through the water with depth controlling devices. Personnel
are often required to weight the cable to the sea bottom with chains and anchor blocks. With active
surf or current conditions, it is likely that the cables will move and then subsequently have to be
manhandled back into position. An alternative cable that can be used very successfully in transition
areas is called a bay cable. It is essentially a very well sealed land cable with geophones on gimbals so
that they remain upright. Some variants of these cables can contain hydrophones as well. This cable
is lighter and easier to handle than a marine type of cable, but it is still not either straightforward or
effortless to use.
Another method of recording data in these zones is to integrate the sensors with data recording
electronics, creating rugged sensor stations that radio transmit the received earth signal back to an
instrument position, either continuously or on command from the observer. In some areas this is
often the only equipment that can be effectively used, but these units still need to be positioned and
anchored appropriately and this is seldom easy. Positioning of the equipment can be complicated.
Close inshore areas are usually less problematic, but the highly variable mid-zone, complete with fast
currents, drifting cables, varying source effort locations, large tidal ranges, intertidal mud flats can
make boat work extremely challenging.
20 © OGP
8 The seismic source
Airgun arrays used during 2D, 3D and 4D surveys are almost always made up of sub-arrays or single
strings of multiple airguns. There are a few main underlying concepts about airguns (and airgun
source arrays) to keep in mind:
1. The output of an airgun is directly proportional to the operating pressure of the airgun (the
norm in the industry is between 2,000 and 2,500 pounds per square inch [psi]).
2. The output of an airgun increases as the cube root of the volume (and less than that for an array,
due to the array effect).
3. The output of an airgun array is generally directly proportional to the number of airguns in the
array,
4. Airgun arrays are not point sources, they typically have dimensions of 15 – 30 metres in-line by
15 – 20 metres cross-line.
5. For a source array, the actual maximum sound output is less than the modeled, or ‘back-calcu-
lated’, value, typically some 15 to 25 dB less. This discrepancy in values is commonly referred to
as the ‘array effect’.
6. The array effect is not a simple one to visualise because the arrays are arranged in a horizontal
plane, so the asymmetry of the array means that the pattern of the pressures moving horizon-
tally out from the array will be different compared to the pattern of pressures moving vertically
up and down from the array. Because the distribution of airgun sizes in the array is not uniform,
the pattern of the pressure values moving away from the array is complicated further.
7. As presented in another chapter, There is a range of ways of expressing sound pressure in numer-
ical terms. These include zero-to-peak (0-Peak or 0-P, or just ‘peak’) Sound Pressure Level (SPL)
– the excursion in amplitude from zero to the maximum value, peak-to-peak (P-P) SPL – the
excursion in amplitude from the maximum value to the minimum value, or some other calcu-
lated value such as the root mean square (RMS) amplitude. These measures ared described in
OGP 2008 In the discussions in this chapter, zero-to-peak (0-Peak) will be used, unless other-
wise stated.
Number (2) is contrary to a popular misconception that a large volume array has a much higher
output than a small volume array. For almost all 3D surveys, arrays will be between 1,000 and 8,000
cubic inches in volume. That volume ratio is 8, the cube root of which is 2. Hence, the 8,000 cubic
inch array has a maximum of twice the output of the 1,000 cubic inch array, a 6dB difference. The
reason that it is a maximum difference is because the array effect will diminish that difference, if the
two arrays have the same number of guns.
Number (3) means that doubling the number of airguns in an array will have a larger effect than
doubling, and, more than likely, trebling, the total volume of the array. This item is the reason that
cluster airgun configurations are used: if a 150 cubic inch airgun has a peak output of 2.8 bar-metres
(see below), then a 300 cubic-inch airgun has a peak output of 3.5 bar-metres (an increase equal to
~26%, equal to the cube root of 2 [300/150]). If two 150-cubic-inch airguns are placed within a
metre of each other, then their output will be ≤5.6 bar-metres, or close to double the output of a
single 150 cubic-inch airgun. This is why it is actually more important to know the number of guns
in an array than it is to know the volume of the array, if one wants to obtain an idea about the maxi-
mum output of the array (as indicated above with respect to the volume of arrays used in the indus-
try, if one knows nothing about a second array, one knows that it can not have a maximum output
greater than 2 times the output of whatever the reference array is, if one is dealing with conventional
3D seismic arrays). If one array has more than twice as many airguns as another array, then one has to
do a bit more analysis to determine the difference in peak outputs between the two arrays. Although
most conventional 3D arrays used by industry will involve no less than 15 and no more than 48 guns.
Table 1 is provided for ease of reference for this section on sources (see OGP report № 406) for a
fuller description of acoustic measurement units). Besides the note at the bottom of the table, that
will be discussed again in a few paragraphs, it is important to glean from the table that a factor of
2=6dB, a factor of 10=20dB, a factor of 100=40dB, and a factor of 1000=60dB. Note also that
this table just lists the zero-to-peak output value of the sources listed, that the sources are towed at a
depth of 5 or 6 metres and that the total frequency band is a maximum of 0 – 900 Hertz.
© OGP 21
Table 1
Source Measured dB re 1µPa Source Back-calculated dB re 1µPa
(broadband) 0-Peak (0-900Hz) 0-Peak
0-Peak 0-Peak
Bar-Metres Bar-Metres
0.00001 120 40.0 252
0.01 180 3959 in3 array (17 guns) 47.4 254
Single 10 in3 gun 1.1 221 5400 in3 array (18 guns) 55.1 255
2.0 226 60.0 256
3090 in3 array (28 guns) 2.7 229 3090 in3 array (28 guns) 57.0 255
Single 150 in gun
3
2.8 229 80.0 258
4.0 232
4450in3 array (24 guns) 8.3 238 4450 in3 array (24 guns) 83.0 258
10.0 240
3797 in3 array (24 guns) 10.7 241 3797 in3 array (24 guns) 50.9 254
12.0 242 100.0 260
15.0 244 110.0 261
20.0 246 120.0 262
The measured values and the back-calculated values are for source depths of either 5 or 6 meters. There are
two different source columns, one with measured values and one with ‘back-calculated’ values. Three sources
are repeated in the two columns – the 3090, 4450 and 3397 arrays. Note that for these three cases, there
is a measured and a back-calculated value, and the back-calculated value is 13-24dB larger than the actual
measured value. The bar-meters values generally increase in this table, first going down the left ‘source’ column
side and then down the right ‘source’ column side. By looking at both of these sides of the table, the relationship
between bar-meters and dB may be seen. In particular, the largest value in the table is 12 million times larger
than the smallest value, which is equal to a difference of 142dB (262dB-120dB).
8.1 Basic operation of an airgun seismic source

One type of airgun is shown schematically in Figure 16. In its ‘charged’ or ‘ready-to-operate’ state,
the high pressure air chambers are sealed by a triggering piston and a firing piston, mounted on a
common shank forming a shuttle. High pressure air, typically at 2,000 or 2,500psi, is supplied to
the return chamber from the compressor onboard the seismic vessel via an air hose and ‘bleeds’ into
the main chamber through a small orifice in the shank of the shuttle. The airgun is sealed because
the area of the left triggering piston is larger than that of the right firing piston. This results in a net
‘holding’ force. The source is activated by sending an electrical pulse to the solenoid valve which
opens, allowing high pressure air to flow to the left side of the triggering piston, into the trigger-
ing chamber. This forces the triggering piston to move away from its rest position and as the firing
piston, which is physically connected to the triggering piston by the shuttle, follows, the high pres-
sure air in the main chamber is discharged into the surrounding water through the ports. The air
from these ports forms a bubble which oscillates. The period and characteristics of the oscillation
beingdepend on the operating pressure, the depth of operation, the temperature and the volume of
air vented into the surrounding water. The shuttle is forced back down to its original position by
the high-pressure air in the control chamber, so that once the main chamber is fully charged with
high-pressure air, the source can then be activated again. The shuttle opens very rapidly (in only a
few milliseconds). This allows the high-pressure air to be discharged very rapidly. One variation in
the design of airguns is the sleeve-gun (Figure 17), which, by nature of its design, has a 360° port or
sleeve in place of air exhaust ports, so that air is expelled uniformly from the source.
22 © OGP
Figure 16 (credit: Sercel)

Photograph of a G Gun (left). Cutaway of an airgun (right).
Figure 17 (credit: ION Geophysical)

Photograph of a variety of dif-
ferent size sleeve guns.
Figure 18a shows an amplitude versus time plot for a single airgun output. This is known as its source
signature. A typical seismic source array is made up of a number of airguns with an assortment of
volumes. This is done to cancel the variation in signal generated by a single airgun (Figure 18a &
b) due to each individual bubble oscillation. The use of many airguns causes the bubble pulses to
interfere destructively with each other, as shown in Figure 19a & b, creating a ’clean’ impulsive array
source signature. The primary output of an airgun source typically has most of the energy in the
frequency bandwidth between 10 and 200 Hz, which is the frequency bandwidth of most interest in
seismic surveying. In some specialised surveys, this bandwidth can be increased, for example when
looking at the shallow surface geology in preparation for siting platforms.
© OGP 23
3
Natural bubble decay
2
Pressure amplitude (bars @ 1m)
-1
Bubble oscillation period

-2
-3
‘Ghost’
-4
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Time (milliseconds)
Figure 18a – Source signature of a single airgun (credit: Polarcus)
Source signature of a single 150 in3 airgun. The pressure amplitude is given in bars at 1m. The total time duration of the signal
shown is ~400ms. The source signature is the time series (pressure amplitude versus time) view of the airgun output.
-10
-20
Relative amplitude (dB)
-30
-40
-50
-60
0 50 100 150 200 250
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 18b – Amplitude spectrum of a single airgun (credit: Polarcus)
Amplitude spectrum of single 150 in3 airgun. Amplitude is shown in negative dB down from the peak at 0 dB which occurs at about
10Hz. The amplitude spectrum displays the amplitude (or relative amplitude as in this case) versus frequency.
24 © OGP
Broadband (2-800Hz) vertical signature

4240 in3 airgun array
100 10
80 8
60 6
Pressure amplitude (bars @ 1m)
40 4
20 2
0 0
-20 -2
-40 -4
-60 -60
-80 -8
-100 -10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Time (milliseconds)
Figure 19a (credit: Polarcus)

This shows the time-series (amplitude versus time) display of an airgun signal from a 4450 in3 array that has 33 active guns. The green numbers
are the theoretical back-calculated values for this array if one could measure the full output at 1m from the center, thus the units bars at 1m. The
black numbers are the actual maximum values in bar-meters that one would measure given the array dimensions of about 14m by 14m.
Broadband (2-800Hz) vertical signature

4240 in3 airgun array
220
210
Hig
h fr
equ
enc
y ro
ll-o
ff
200
dB re 1 µPa-/Hz
190
180
170
160
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 19b (credit: Polarcus)
This shows the amplitude versus frequency (amplitude spectrum) display of an airgun signal from a 4450 cubic-inch array that has 24 active
guns. The very low values that occur every 125Hz are caused by the ‘ghost’ notch, due to the array being towed at 6m depth.
© OGP 25
Total energy source volumes vary from survey to survey and are designed to provide sufficient seis-
mic energy to illuminate the geological objective of the survey. The number of airguns in the array,
their size and distribution are selected to reduce the effects of the bubble oscillations and to provide
source directivity.
An airgun array is commonly made up of sub-arrays or ‘strings’, which are suspended from floata-
tion devices to maintain the specified operating depth. The layout of a three-string array is shown in
Figure 20. Array dimensions are usually on the order of 15-25 metres wide by 15-20 metres long. A
typical sub-array is illustrated in Figure 21a and a photo of single airgun suspended from a float is
shown in Figure 21.
Figure 20 – airgun array geometry (credit: Polarcus)

4240 in3 airgun array geometry. There are 3 sub-arrays: each of the 3 left-to-right lines of guns. Black guns are inactive (spare) guns, gray
guns are cluster guns (2 guns so close together that they act as a single gun) and white guns are single guns. The number listed on each
gun indicates the cubic inches for that individual gun (for the cluster guns, both guns will have the same cubic-inch value).
26 © OGP
Figure 21a – Side view diagram of a sub-array (credit: Polarcus)

Side-view diagram of a sub-array from the 3 sub-array 4240 in3 array. There are 12 guns arranged in pairs (2-gun clusters) in this sub-array. The yellow tube at the
top provides floatation and the guns are hung below at the desired depth below the water surface. Also note the position of an rGPS beacon on top of the float and an
acoustic transponder below the guns. These provide precise positioning information of the guns relative to the vessel and the seismic signal receivers (streamers).
Figure 21b (credit: Western Geco)

Single airgun suspended
The output characteristics of typical marine seismic source array are commonly presented in terms
of a nominal peak source level or sound pressure level (SPL) in dB re 1 µPa @ 1m. It should be noted
that this SPL represents the so-called ‘back calculated’ SPL, which is the pressure level that would
be achieved if all the elements in the source were concentrated into a single point (with zero dimen-
sions!). The actual sound pressure level in the vicinity of the source array is lower, where the maxi-
mum SPL is some 15 to 20dB – 10 times smaller than the nominal output of the array.
© OGP 27
Figures 22a and22b are necessarily somewhat involved graphics indicating the radiation pattern,
or directivity plots representing the pressure pattern from a seismic source array. The pressure is
released in all directions, but not in a symmetrical and uniform way. The non-uniformity is caused
by
i. the overall dimensions of the array;
ii. fact that all of the airguns are basically tied together in a horizontal plane, and are not also
distributed in a vertical one;
iii. non-uniform distribution of airgun volume sizes (as shown in Figure 20); and
iv. non-uniform properties (velocity, density, temperature, salinity) of the volume of water sur-
rounding the array, including also the variable roughness of the sea surface.
Figures 22a & b demonstrates the far-field pressure pattern, for a constant frequency of 60Hz, for
the 4240in3 airgun array. The three dimensional pressure field can be conceptually viewed as a hemi-
spherical shell with the pressure field impinging on about 2/3rds of the shell.. Vertically down is
in the very centre, and the peak pressure occurs there at a relative level of 0dB. The first (smallest)
concentric circle out from the centre intersects the shell at 10° up from vertical, and the pressure level
is still the same. The 3rd concentric circle intersects the shell 30° up from vertical and looking at an
azimuth of 0 and 180 (in line with the vessel), the pressure level is still well within the dark orange
zone. However, looking at an azimuth of +90 and −90 (that is side-on), the pressure level is right
on the boundary between the dark orange, and the lighter orange, or 6dB down. The next-to-last
concentric circle intersects the shell at 50° up from vertical, and, in line with the vessel, the pressure
is still within 6dB of the maximum, but in a direction of port-to-starboard, the level is in the green
to white region, depending on whether the view is to port or to starboard. White is 24dB down from
the maximum, and the first green is 30dB down.
Figure 22a (credit: Polarcus)

This is a constant frequency (60Hz) acoustic radiation response for the 4240in3 airgun array. Colours indicate relative pressure levels: orange is the high-
est and the dark blue is 60dB down (1/1000th) down from the orange level. The angles (0, 180, +90, -90) indicate looking to stern, to bow, to starboard,
and to port respectively. The center of the diagram is vertically down and each inner concentric circle represents 20° of elevation from the vertical. The
outside edge is 90° from the vertical and shows propagation levels in the horizontal directions. For example: 60° up from the vertical in the starboard direc-
tion has a relative pressure level that is on the edge of pale orange and yellow which is between 12 & 18dB lower (¼ to 1/8) than the maximum.
28 © OGP
Figure 22b (credit: Polarcus)

This is the in-line acoustic radiation response for the 4240 in3 airgun array. Colours indicate relative pressure levels: orange is the highest and the dark blue
is 60dB down (1/1000th) down from the orange level. The angles (+90, 0, and -90) indicate looking to bow, vertically down, and to stern respectively.
The concentric circles indicate frequency from 0 to 125Hz (the annotations are split on each side only for visual clarity). For example, ~60° up from the
in the stern direction, at 100Hz, the relative pressure level is white, which is between 24 & 30dB lower (1/16 to 1/32) lower than the maximum.
Figure 22b shows a vertical section view, in line with the vessel. The radial lines are vertically down,
30° up from vertical, and 60° up from vertical. The pressure level does not drop anywhere in the
region from vertically down until an angle greater than 30° up from vertical is reached, except in
the region of the smallest concentric circle. This circle represents frequencies less than 10Hz. The
next concentric circle represents frequencies between 10 and 20Hz, and so forth. The graphic here
presents what the pressure field looks like in the vertical planar section in line with the vessel, so in
only two dimensions, but shows how that field varies with frequency. The pressure levels can change
radically with frequency, particularly near the surface. The main point to be taken from Figures 22a
& b is that the radiation pattern in detail can be complex, but overall is focused as a conical volume
with the long axis in line with the vessel, and the focusing strength about a factor of two greater
within 40° or so of vertical.
Figure 23a maps the modeled sound pressure 12.5 metres below a typical source array.
Figure 23b is dealing with the same array that is treated in Figure 23a. The plot represents a ‘view’ in
a vertical plane (looking from one side of the source array) aligned along the position of the middle
of the three sub-arrays comprising the full array. This plot shows the peak pressure along this plane,
so the pressure field is close to circular in shape below the middle of the array.
Source arrays are designed to focus energy downward into the subsurface as illustrated in Figures
22b & 23b. The depth of the source effectively controls the high frequency output of the source. The
signatures previously shown are for sources operating at a depth of 5-8m, which is typical for many
seismic surveys . The amplitude reduction at 125Hz is known as the ‘ghost notch’ (see Figures 19a &
b). This is caused by destructive interference between the energy travelling directly from the source
and that reflected from the sea surface, which is delayed by the additional time taken to travel the 12
metres up to the sea surface and back down again (Figure 19a & b).
© OGP 29
2
Peak overpressure in dB re uPa , horizontal section at 12.5m depth
235
30
20
230
crossline distance (m)
10
225
220
−10
215
−20
−30
210
−30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30
inline distance(m)
Figure 23a (courtesy IAGC)
This shows the modeled sound pressure (zero-to-peak) on a horizontal slice at a depth of 12.5 metres. The depth of the array is 7.5 metres, and
the total frequency band used is 0-400 Hz. It has 18 elements arranged in three subarrays each 15 metres long and separated by 7.5 metres. It
has a total volume of 5205 cubic inches and is charged to 2000 psi. The elements at the front (left) of the array are larger and this accounts for
the inline asymmetry. The yellow crosses indicate positions of the source elements. Contours are shown from 210dB re μPa2 upwards.
The pressure levels emitted from a source array decay with distance and generally decay more quickly
with distance for high frequencies than for low frequencies (Figures 24a & b). The pressure levels in a
given high frequency band are also lower than are emitted in a comparably wide low frequency band,
once the frequencies of consideration are above about 100Hz. SPL’s are lower at higher frequencies
than at lower frequencies, and longer source-to-receiver ranges have lower SPL’s than shorter source-
to-receiver ranges. Figure 25 deals with energy rather than pressure (amplitude) levels, so that the
partitioning by frequency can be more clearly seen. The primary point of this figure is to show that
99.9% of the energy (the blue curve is the cumulative energy, and its scale is the right-hand vertical
axis) from an airgun source array is contained in frequencies between about 2Hz and 305Hz.
30 © OGP
2
Peak overpressure in dB re uPa , vertical inline section along central subarray
0
235
−10
−20 230
depth (m)
−30 225
−40 220
−50
215
−60
210
−30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30
inline distance(m)
Figure 23b (courtesy IAGC)
This shows the modeled sound pressure (zero-to-peak) on an inline vertical slice through the centre of the array. The depth of the array is 7.5 metres,
and the total frequency band used is 0-400 Hz. It has 18 elements arranged in three subarrays each 15 metres long and separated by 7.5 metres.
It has a total volume of 5205 cubic inches and is charged to 2000 psi. The elements at the front (left) of the array are larger and this accounts for
the inline asymmetry. The yellow crosses indicate positions of the source elements. Contours are shown from 210dB re μPa2 upwards.
© OGP 31
Figure 24a (credit: Rob McCauley, Curtin University for Santos Ltd.)
The top two panels show the frequency content with range of seismic air gun arrays operated along the bathymetry path shown on the lower panel (where
the y axis is water depth in metres). The top panel shows signals from a 3040 in3 airgun array source while the lower panel shows signals from a 2130
in3 source run along the same survey line with as best as possible each shot of the two arrays fired at the same location. The range has been arbitrar-
ily assigned as negative for signals to the east of the receiver location. The two survey lines started at the eastern (negative range) end and ran to the
west. The survey line was approximately perpendicular to the continental shelf edge. The receivers were located on the sea floor at 152 m depth.
32 © OGP
Figure 24b (credit: Rob McCauley, Curtin University for Santos Ltd.)
Spectral content of two approaching air gun arrays at 1 and 10 km (red is 3040 in3 source, blue 2130
in3). The black line is the average low ambient noise conditions at the site.
(QHUJ\IOX[VSHFWUDOGHQVLW\ FXPXODWLYHHQHUJ\IOX[

G%HQHUJ\IOX[VSHFWUDOGHQVLW\UH
-PA#P

&XPXODWLYHHQHUJ\IOX[

GEUH-P#P

+]
Figure 25 (credit: Gary Hampson, Chevron)

Broadband spectrum of the energy flux (proportional to the square of the amplitude) indicated by the vertical axis on the right. The main point from
this figure is that 99.9% of the energy is contained in frequencies below 305Hz. These data are for the 3397 cubic-inch array that has 24 guns.
© OGP 33
8.2 Marine vibrators

A marine vibrator (Figure 26) operates by using either hydraulic or electrical power to drive an actu-
ating plate in a controlled, oscillatory manner. The advantage of this is that a very precise signal can
be projected into the subsurface. The signal usually employed is a group, or sweep, of frequencies, for
example 10-80Hz, over a 10-second interval. Thus the instantaneous sound pressure level is much
lower than that from an airgun. The recorded data are then correlated against the input sweep to
recover the reflection record. Control of these devices is however, very complex, due to non-linear
feedback in the internal mechanisms in the case of hydraulic vibrators. The output from a single
vibrator, even after correlation, is comparable to that from an airgun sub-array but suffers the disad-
vantage that its low frequency response has historically been poor. Thus,the likelihood of imaging
deep geologic targets is reduced. Whilst the geophysical concept of marine vibrators is understood
and offers great promise, further investment and development will be required in order to improve
operational efficiency and data imaging capability that is comparable with airgun source arrays.
Figure 26 – marine vibrator (credit: Petroleum Geo-Services)

Marine vibrator source (left). Illustration of a marine vibrator source array underwater (right)
These factors have resulted in only very limited use of vibrators in the offshore industry, with no
commercial surveys having been conducted for several years. Vibrators have been used for Vertical
Seismic Profiling which is briefly described in Section 6. Clearly, as the energy of the vibrator source
is spread out over a much longer time than that from an airgun array – tens of seconds rather than
a few hundred milliseconds – the radiated sound pressure level is correspondingly lower. Addition-
ally, as a controlled source, where the upper and lower frequencies of vibration are user defined (apart
from the inevitably generated harmonics) the broadband output of a vibrator source is considerably
less than that from an airgun array. No broadband measurements have been taken at this time so it
is not possible at the present to quantify the relative broadband signal levels between the different
sources. Development work continues.
34 © OGP
9 The seismic streamer
The seismic cable or streamer (Figure 27) detects the very low level of reflected energy that travels
from the seismic source, through the water layer, down through the earth and back up to the sur-
face, using pressure sensitive devices called hydrophones. These convert the reflected pressure signals
into electrical signals, which are digitised and transmitted along the seismic streamer to the record-
ing system on board the vessel where the data are stored onto tape or disc. Normal noise levels in
calm weather conditions are of the order of 2-3 microbars root mean square (RMS) and it is quite
common for streamers to remain operating in the water for months at a time.
The streamer itself is made up of five principal components:
1. hydrophones, usually spaced almost 1 metre apart, but electrically coupled in groups 12.5 or 25
metres in length
2. electronic modules, which digitise and transmit the seismic data
3. stress members, steel or kevlar,that provide the physical strength required, allowing the streamer
to be towed in the roughest of weather
4. an electrical transmission system, for power to the streamer electronic modules and peripheral
devices, and for data telemetry
5. the skin of the streamer in which all the above are housed.
The groups in the streamer are combined into sections, each 50-100 metres in length, to allow mod-
ular replacement of damaged sections. Each section is terminated with a connector unit, and is filled
with electrical isolating fluid, with a specific gravity of less than one, to make the overall streamer
neutrally buoyant. , Historically, this fluid has been an organic compound such as kerosene, used
primarily since it would evaporate in the event of a spill. (for a variety of reasons it has been kero-
sene, one of which was so it would evaporate quickly in the event of spills). More recently a purely
synthetic material has been used.
Recent advances in cable technology have led to a new generation of seismic streamer, moving away
from the traditional fluid-filled cable to a solid cable, constructed of extruded foam, where the
requirement for fluid is minimised or removed entirely. This generation of streamer has many advan-
tages in that it is more robust and resistant to damage, does not leak streamer ballast fluid when dam-
aged either on the vessel or in the sea and is less sensitive to weather and wave noise. This has been
achieved without reducing the sensitivity of the cable to the reflected signal. Another variation has
been the introduction of gel-filled cables which combine some of the advantages of fluid-filled cables
– ease of component replacement and manufacturing with those of solid cables – no fluid leakage
and reduced levels of energy propagating inside the cables themselves. A further development has
been the introduction of single sensor recording where the output of each individual hydrophone is
recorded. This system is designed to improve the resolution of the recorded data.

Photograph of a streamer entering the water (left). Photograph of a solid-fill streamer stored on a reel (right).
© OGP 35
Streamer lengths have increased over time with improving technology. The streamer length depends
on the depth and type of the geological target for a given survey. For instance, streamer lengths
employed in the North Sea are typically shorter than those used in the Gulf of Mexico, or offshore
West Africa. Recent surveys in the North Sea have seen streamer lengths that were typically 3,000
metres now 5,000-6,000 metres. Whereas in the Gulf of Mexico and offshore West Africa some
surveys are using streamers up to 12,000 metres in length. This increase in length, coupled with
the increasing number of deployed streamers, has resulted in a marked increase in the quantity of
streamers in the water, with survey vessels regularly deploying 40-50 km of streamer.
Streamer tow depths are a compromise between the requirement to operate these sensitive devices
away from the weather and wave noise, which limits the usability of the recorded data, and the ghost
notch mentioned earlier, which affects the streamer in exactly the same way as the source. The deeper
the tow depth;the greater the immunity to weather noise, but also the narrower the bandwidth of
the data. As for most operationalparameters, the specific survey objectives will dictate the precise
streamer depth required. Typically the range of operating depths varies from 4-5 metres for shallow,
high resolution surveys in relatively good weather areas like the southern North Sea, to 6 metres
in probably a majority of areas around the world, to 8-10 metres for deeper penetration, lower fre-
quency targets in locations such as the European Atlantic Margin.
In addition to the internal components, there are different types of external devices, which are some-
times attached to the streamer, such as depth control units or birds (Figure 28), lateral-control birds
(Figure 29), magnetic compasses (often integrated within depth control units), and acoustic posi-
tioning units. Power for these systems is provided both through the streamer itself, inductively cou-
pled, and by batteries in each external device. In addition, a tailbuoy (Figure 30) is connected to the
end of each streamer to provide hazard warning of the submerged towed streamer, especially impor-
tant at night, positional information from a GPS receiver and tension for the tail of the streamer.
Depth control units or birds (Figure 28) are used to control the depth of the streamer to an accuracy
of typically +/– 1 metre. The wings on the bird are electronically controlled to pivot in response to
the hydrostatic pressure (depth) measured by a pressure transducer inside each bird. If the streamer is
too deep, the wing is rotated up to provide lift; if too shallow, the opposite occurs. As the streamer is
weighted to be neutrally buoyant, the birds are used to counteract depth variations in the streamers
introduced by vessel pitching moments in heavy weather or when different currents are experienced,
with corresponding fluctuations in density and/or temperature. These units are normally spaced
approximately 300 metres apart on each streamer.

Example of one type of depth-control bird.
36 © OGP

On the left is an example of one type of ‘lateral-control bird.’ These are used to control horizontal cable movement in the water and keep the streamers in
a certain location relative to one another. On the right is a photograph of the lateral-control bird attached to the streamer before entering the water.
As previously mentioned, it is critically important for the success of a 3D survey to know very
precisely the location of sources and receivers, so a variety of hardware is used to achieve this. The
shape that the streamer adopts as it is being towed through the water is usually determined using
compasses, which measure the deviation of the streamer relative to magnetic North. A computer
algorithm is used to derive the shape of the streamer from these individual compass measurements,
which are taken roughly once every 300 metres. In addition to the compasses, acoustic ranging units
are used to provide additional positional information. These are attached to the hull of the vessel,
the source floats, the streamers themselves, and the tailbuoys. The travel times between a variety of
acoustic node locations are measured and solved, together with the streamer shape information from
the compasses, to provide a better positional solution. The acoustic units operate at moderate to high
acoustic frequencies, 10 to 100 kiloHertz, with a maximum output SPL of approximately 195 dB re
1 microPascal at 1metre (most systems operate at levels below this). They provide range information
up to approximately 1 kilometre, after which distance the received sound pressure levels of these
signals are attenuated to background levels.
The tailbuoy (Figure 30) is used to house Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) receivers
that are used in the positioning solution for the hydrophone groups in the streamers. It has been
mentioned several times that one of the critical elements in the 3D seismic method is the positioning
of the in-sea equipment. These devices all contribute to the location accuracy of 3-8 metres absolute,
with which seismic surveys are normally conducted. Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS)
is the standard system used for positioning the vessel itself and Relative DGPS is used to position
both source floats and tailbuoys. Compasses and acoustics are used to position the subsea equipment
relative to these. Recently, depth control bird technology has been developed to provide a limited
degree of lateral streamer positioning control – so called ‘streamer steering’. In this technology, the
bird wings operate in both the cross-line and vertical planes to compensate for approximately 3-4
degrees of streamer feathering, which is beneficial for 4D surveys.
Figure 30 (credit: Fugro-Geoteam)

Photographs of tailbuoys on deck (left). Photograph of tailbuoys deployed in the water (right).
© OGP 37
38 © OGP
10 Ancillary equipment
In addition to the in-sea equipment described above, there are a number of other devices used in seis-
mic exploration. As the search for offshore oil and gas goes into ever deeper waters, the effectiveness
of surface mounted sensors is reduced because power at the high frequencies necessary to provide
the high resolution definition of the near seabed is lost in the water column. Also, the effectiveness
of deep towed systems is lost because they, and, therefore, the data they acquire, cannot be posi-
tioned accurately. Moreover, line turn times are greatly increased when the survey vessel is towing
a negatively buoyant cable several kilometres long. To mitigate this situation, Autonomous Under-
water Vehicles (AUV’s) (Figure 31) have been developed which are equipped with multi-beam echo
sounders, sidescan sonars and chirp sub-bottom profilers. They are truly autonomous, being capable
of travelling to the seabed, up to 4,500 metres down and surveying a prescribed grid of lines, and
acquiring the data sets described earlier in this section (except airgun/sparker data). In water depths
greater than approximately 300 metres, the following benefits accrue:
• The data are very high quality because the AUV flies at the optimum height above the seabed at
the optimum speed and in an extremely stable attitude.
• The data are very tightly coupled to the seabed and therefore the location of the features on it
and under it is accurate.
• The survey is completed sooner because far less time is spent making line turns.
Doppler sonar current metres are devices used
to measure the magnitude and direction of sub-
surface currents by measuring the Doppler shifts
that affect acoustic signals that are reflected due
to the variations in temperature and density of
the water in different current layers. The oper-
ating frequency is inversely proportional to the
range and can vary from 600 kHz (50 metres)
to 2 MHz (10 metres). Output source pressure
levels are typically 160 to 210dB re 1 μPascal at
1 metre. Echo sounders are more sophisticated
versions of the systems that are installed on
every marine vessel. Typical operating frequen-
cies range from 12kHz to 200kHz. The sound
source pressure levels are 180 to 230dB re 1 Figure 31 (credit: Fugro Survey)
μPascal at 1 metre. Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) being launched from its support vehicle.
© OGP 39
40 © OGP
11 Operational performance
The rate of progress during a seismic survey depends on a number of factors, but the most dominant
is usually the weather. Other issues that affect the duration of a specific survey are:
• Survey location
• Time of year
• Survey size, particularly sail line length
• Technical acquisition parameterss
• Vessel configuration
• Line orientation and prevailing current direction
• Fishing and shipping activity in the survey area
• Other seismic operations
• Marine mammal activity
• Drilling and subsea equipment maintenance
• Technical equipment downtime
The net effect of all of these factors is to limit the time actually spent acquiring seismic data to just
35 - 40% of the available time.
The reason the weather is so important is that the signal levels that are recorded by the seismic
streamer are very small. Because there is a requirement to record data with as wide a frequency band-
width as possible, to improve the resolution with which geologic features in the subsurface can be
identified and mapped, the streamers are towed at quite shallow depths to avoid problems with the
ghost notch. Thus any wave action, which is directly proportional to weather conditions, causes
noise that degrades the quality of the recorded data. The location, timing and duration of a survey
is dictated by the weather environment for the survey, as does the time of year the survey is being
conducted. Offshore West Africa, for example, the weather is much better than in the North Sea.
Thus, two identically sized surveys in these two regions could have significantly different durations.
A survey vessel typically operates at a tow speed of between 4.5 and 5.0 knots (approximately 9 kilo-
metres/hour). At this rate, the survey vessel could conceivably cover some 216 kilometres in a day
and almost 6,500 kilometres m in one month. As survey dimensions are not usually as great as 200
kilometres, the vessel must turn at the end of each line before starting the next, the 3D ‘racetrack’
shown in Figure 8. With seismic streamers as long as 8,000 metres (and in some cases even longer)
being towed behind the vessel, and with as many as 16 streamers being towed simultaneously, the
time taken to change direction or line change time, may be up to three hours or more for the largest
streamer configuration, which is significant. For a survey with a 45-kilometre line length, which is
fairly long even by today’s standards, the line acquisition time of 5 hours is then followed by a line
change of 3 hours or 60% of the acquisition time. It thus follows that when a vessel acquires more
than 100 traverse kilometres in a single day, it is considered very productive.
The specific technical acquisition parameters for a given survey also influence productivity. For a
survey with a shallow depth of target, the need to record higher frequencies, up to 100 Hertz, neces-
sitates the use of shallow tow depths for the streamer. This increases the effect of wave noise, thus
rendering the operation more prone to weather downtime. If the survey objective were deeper, then
deeper streamer depths could be used and the productivity of the operation would improve. As dis-
cussed, the configuration of the deployed equipment, that is the number of sources and streamers
utilised, dictates the number of subsurface CMP lines that will be generated for each vessel sail line
as shown previously. Thus a vessel towing eight streamers will acquire approximately twice as much
data per pass as a vessel towing four streamers using the same source effort. For a 1,000 square kilo-
metre survey (40 kilometres x 25 kilometres), a four-streamer vessel would require 125 sail lines to
cover the area assuming perfect coverage. The eight streamer vessel would logically require only half
this number, 62.5, and thus would acquire the data in just over half the time. The incremental time
to deploy the additional in-sea equipment, and the extra line change time, are among the reasons
why the time is not precisely halved, but overall these ‘extra’ times are small.
© OGP 41
The relative orientation of the survey to the prevailing current and tides has an impact on survey effi-
ciency, since the feathering of the streamers is dictated by these conditions. If the survey is oriented
so that the main currents are in the direction of sail line, changes in these currents and tides will
have little impact on the feathering of the streamers. If these currents are across the sail line and they
vary, the feathering of the streamers will correspondingly change, causing irregularities in the loca-
tion of the subsurface data being collected. These irregularities result in data holes or gaps, which
need to be ‘infilled’, a term used to describe the additional sail lines required during a 3D survey to
acquire data for those areas of irregularities in subsurface coverage caused by the feathering of the
streamers. In areas with very severe current variation, infill can amount to as much as 40 - 50% of
the total survey area, which has a very dramatic impact on the time taken to complete the survey.
Typically infill is between 10 and 20% but increases with increasing streamer length.
The presence of shipping in the survey area can restrict vessel operations due to physical access con-
straints such as proximity to harbours, data acquisition in shipping lane areas such as the English
Channel, or due to excessive noise contamination from other vessels. The effect of such vessel noise
can require portions of the recorded data to be re-recorded, which necessitates the vessel repeating
asail line. Although seismic vessels are flagged to indicate that they are towing equipment in the
water, and employ guard vessels to try to ensure that other vessel traffic does not sail across the sub-
merged streamers, other vessels do not always respond and the depth control birds have to be used
to effect an ‘emergency dive’ to lower the streamers below the keel depth of the transgressing vessel
when this happens. This results in data acquisition having to be aborted and the vessel having to
circle to re-acquire the line, starting some distance back from where the incident occurred to ensure
proper overlap of subsurface data coverage. Container vessels and oil tankers, which often prove dif-
ficult to contact, provide a particular hazard to survey operations due to their size and limited speed
of manoeuvring capabilities.
In a similar manner, fishing activity can restrict vessel operations, either by the presence of fixed gear,
which has to be systematically removed, or by long lines, which become entangled in the streamers.
Disruption to fishing activity by a seismic survey can lead to physical confrontation offshore, unless
proper notification and communication of the impending survey has been undertaken.
42 © OGP
The source energy from one seismic survey being detected by other seismic vessels in the vicinity of
the same survey area can also reduce productivity. This is known as seismic interference (SI), and
the severity of the problem is highly dependent on a number of factors, including the direction from
which the interference is from, water depth in the survey area, the source volumes used, the nature of
the sea bed and any layering (temperature, salinity) in the water column itself. The impact radius can
be significant, but there have been significant efforts in recent years to try to improve data processing
methods to allow data to be acquired in the presence of SI.
If surveys are being conducted in close proximity to drilling rigs or production platforms, there
can also be delays. Since the reflected seismic data is of very low amplitude, local noise from both
the motors and various other equipment running on the rig, in addition to downhole noise from
the drill bit itself, can degrade the recording, necessitating re-shoots in extreme cases. Supply vessel
movements and general traffic restrictions in producing fields can limit seismic vessel access. Seismic
operations are also prohibited within 1,500 metres of any diving activity, a frequent occurrence
around platforms and in the maintenance of subsea equipment, including pipelines.
The performance of the survey equipment, both onboard and deployed from the survey vessel, also
has a strong impact on survey duration. However, it is worth noting that overall seismic vessel effi-
ciency has improved in recent years at the same time as the volume, number, and length of streamers
has dramatically increased. Just as the last two decades have seen much improvement in efficiency,
that time period has seen other issues come to the fore, so that they just become another piece of the
operational puzzle. Mitigation measures for the protection of marine mammals is one such issue,
and they are handled on a case-by-case basis in a straight-forward way. Local restrictions and require-
ments are observed, and operational procedures are set up and executed to meet those conditions.
It is impossible to define the duration of a typical seismic survey, as there are simply too many factors
that have to be included. For a specific size of survey, in a given location at a particular time of year,
using a defined configuration, with no seismic or shipping/fishing interference, to be acquired with
established acquisition parameters, a survey duration can be estimated.
© OGP 43
44 © OGP
About IAGC About OGP
The International Association of Geophysical Contractors The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers
(IAGC) is the international trade association representing (OGP) encompasses most of the world’s leading publicly
the industry that provides geophysical services (geophysical traded, private and state-owned oil & gas companies, oil
data acquisition, seismic data ownership and licensing, geo- & gas associations and major upstream service companies.
physical data processing and interpretation, and associated OGP members operate in more than 80 different countries
service and product providers) to the oil and gas industry. and produce more than half the world’s oil and about one
IAGC members provides services to the oil and gas indus- third of its gas.
try throughout the world; both onshore and offshore. The association was formed in 1974 to develop effective
communications between the upstream industry and an
increasingly complex network of international regulators.
OGP works with its members to achieve continuous
improvement in safety, health and environmental perform-
ance, and in the engineering and operation of upstream
ventures.
OGP, 209-215 Blackfriars Road, IAGC, 1225 North Loop West, Suite 220,
London, SE1 8NL, UK Houston, TX 77008, USA
Tel +44(0)20 7633 0272 Tel +1 713 957 8080
www.ogp.org.uk www.iagc.org

Marine Seismic

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Marine Seismic

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Marine Seismic

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

An overview of marine seismic operations

Report No. 448

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Internationally recognised source of industry information

Report No: 448

1 Introduction and underlying principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1 Introduction and underlying principles

Figure 2 (credit: Jack Caldwell & Chris Walker)

2 Some wave propagation fundamentals

Figure 3 (credit: Jack Caldwell)

3 Towed marine seismic methods

3.1 Towed streamer 2D acquisition

2D lines, sub-surface geologic horizons are identified, posi-

Figure 6 – feathering (credit: Chris Walker)

3.2 Site surveys

3.3 Towed streamer 3D acquisition

3.3.1 Multi-streamer operations

Figure 9 – schematic diagram of an 8-streamer, dual-source operation (credit: Chris Walker)

3.3.3 3D seismic survey vessel

Currents, water depth and obstructions

4 Advanced acquisition techniques

4.2 Wide azimuth

Figure 12 – Wide-azimuth towed streamer geometry (credit: WesternGeco)

5 Ocean bottom seismic techniques

5.1 Four-Component (4C) data acquisition

5.2 Two-Component (2C) data acquisition

5.3 Autonomous nodes

Figure 14 – Ocean bottom node acquisition (credit: FairfieldNodal)

5.4 Permanent seismic installations

6 Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP)

7 Shallow water/Transition Zone (TZ) acquisition

8 The seismic source

8.1 Basic operation of an airgun seismic source

Figure 16 (credit: Sercel)

Figure 17 (credit: ION Geophysical)

Bubble oscillation period

Broadband (2-800Hz) vertical signature

Figure 19a (credit: Polarcus)

Broadband (2-800Hz) vertical signature

Figure 20 – airgun array geometry (credit: Polarcus)

Figure 21a – Side view diagram of a sub-array (credit: Polarcus)

Figure 21b (credit: Western Geco)

Figure 22a (credit: Polarcus)

Figure 22b (credit: Polarcus)

Figure 25 (credit: Gary Hampson, Chevron)

8.2 Marine vibrators

Figure 26 – marine vibrator (credit: Petroleum Geo-Services)

9 The seismic streamer

Figure 27 (credit: ION Geophysical)

Figure 28 (credit: ION Geophysical)

Figure 29 (credit: ION Geophysical)

Figure 30 (credit: Fugro-Geoteam)

10 Ancillary equipment

11 Operational performance

You might also like