Fuel Cat Fines - Problems and Mitigation: Paul Hill

Fuel cat fines - problems and mitigation
Paul Hill
Chief Surveyor, Western Europe,
Braemar (inc The Salvage Association)
John L. David
Marine Investigator + Consultant,
Marine Professionals
The Rise in Claims Attributed to
Cat Fines in Bunker Fuel
What can be done about it?
Paul Hill
Braemar SA
&
Capt. John L. David
What we will discuss today
A Cat Fine
What are Cat Fines?
Catalytic Fines (from here on known a Cat Fines)
Hard Ceramic Compounds of Aluminium and Silicon,
Used as a catalyst in the crude oil refining process,
To enable higher yield of distillate fuels to be
extracted from the stock
The process is called catalytic cracking.
The cat fines are expensive and are mostly recovered
and used again, however small quantities may be
carried over with the residual fuel
How big are Cat Fines?
Cat Fines
embedded in a
fuel filter
How small are Cat Fines?
75 μm down to 1 μm
1 μm (micron)
= 0.001 mm
25 μm
What do Cat Fines do?
They get embedded into engine components and
cause abrasive wear
The main components affected are cylinder

liners and piston rings
Can affect fuel pumps, injectors and valves
In extreme cases piston rods and stuffing boxes
Are all engines at risk?
Cat fine damage mainly occurs in large slow speed
main engines: Why?
The larger fuel injection components allow sizeable cat fine
particles into the cylinders
Cylinder lubricating oil is minimally applied to the liner surface,
and doesn’t wash cat fines away
Less probable to find cat fine damage to medium and
high speed engines: Why?
More copious splash lubrication of cylinder liners can wash
away cat fine particles
Closer tolerance of components prevents
ingress of larger particles
Why are cylinder liners
vulnerable to cat fines?
Close up view of the cylinder oil
lubrication of the liner
10 micron
Embedded cat fine

25 micron diameter
The effect of cat fines embedded in

the liner are shown here
Are Cat Fines a New Problem?
The answer to this is simply NO
Up until the 1950’s residual fuel oil was burnt in boilers, to create steam for
turbines, the most common form of marine engine at the time.
Large slow speed diesel engines slowly became popular in the 1960’s and
70’s as the ability to burn residual fuels improved.
1973 Middle East War tripled the price of crude oil, refiners forced to
squeeze more product from the crude stock.
Catalytic Cracking processes developed
1980’s engine problems attributed to these Cat Fines started to be reported.
Early Warnings!
Cat Fine Engine Damage Cases
surveyed by Braemar SA
No. Of Cases
15
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Why The Recent Rise in
Cat Fine Claims ?
Environmental Legislation Demands:
Sulphur Emission Control Areas (ECAs)
Commercial Demands:
Cheaper fuels
Marine Sulphur Limits
5
4,5
4
3,5
3
2,5
2 ECA Zones
1,5 Global
1
0,5
0
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Emission Control Areas
1 % Sulphur in fuel oil at present

In 2015 this is to drop much further to 0.1% Sulphur
A Worrying Trend
5
4,5
The
4 Correlation
Between Low
3,5
Sulphur
3 Legislation
2,5 and the
Increase in
2 Cat Fine
1,5 Engine
Damage
1 Cases.
0,5
0
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
What do the analysts say ?
The 2012 Global Cap of 3.5% sulphur
What do the experts say ?
30
29 Average Worldwide Cat Fines Trend

28
27
26,8
Cat Fines ppm
25,9
26 25,6
25
24 23,5
23
22,1
22
21
20
2007 2008 Year 2009 2010 2011
Statistics courtesy of DNVPS

60
The regional trends?
48
Average Cat Fines by Region 2012
50
45
43
41
40
34 33 34 33 33 32 32
30
30 27 27 26 27 27
24
22 22 21 21
19 19 20
20 18
LSFO
HSFO
10
0
Who cares about all this anyway?
What can be done?
What is being done?
The International Organisation for Standardization
Since 1982 have published a specification
for marine bunker fuels specifying the
maximum limits of various
characteristic, components and
contaminants.
The standard is known as ISO 8217 and is
currently in it’s fifth revision:
ISO 8217: 2012

More than 15 ppm
 Main engine makers specify maximum 15 ppm catalyst fines
ISO 8217 Standards
1996 (2nd Edition) maximum 80 ppm

2012 (5th Edition) maximum 60 ppm
Refiners can produce 15ppm fuel oil, but it will cost more
“..anyhow, all ships are built with a fuel treatment system

that is capable of removing the cat fines to a level below
the 15 ppm stated by engine makers, so what’s the problem”?
The Fuel Cost Issue
 Fuel usually paid for by the TIME charterer
 If stipulated in c/p 59.99 mg/kg Cat fines is legally “OK”
 Sampling; representative? reliable analysis?
 Singapore USD/tonne (11 September 2013)
HFO 380 Cst = $ 594 HFO 180 Cst = $613
MDO = $909 (=50% more expensive than HFO)
 $700,000 Panamax N.O.- China (save $120,000-HFO-380)
 Too much fuel storage ties up money/shuts out cargo
 Not enough, or suitable storage tanks
 If they can get away with cheap, off-spec fuel, they will
A Cylinder Liner
A Purifier
A fuel problem
The Fuel Contract Time Bar
“ Any and all claims arising out or in
connection with marine fuel supplied shall
be null and void if not submitted in writing
by the Buyer to Seller within 7 days after
the marine fuel has been delivered”
Liability
 The fuel was supplied within ISO standards
 Crew did not get Cat Fines out = “Crew Negligence”
 But…
They were unaware they were there/the amount of them, plus
Poorly trained
Poorly instructed and/or supervised
Poorly equipped from the start
Equipment poorly maintained
Overworked/fatigued
Not enough time to do the job
Major grounding/pollution – Owner faces criminal sanctions (SOLAS)
 “The 2 tugs should be with the casualty in about 9 days”

Claims – The Legal Bit
 ITC Hulls – Claim presented as
Fire Explosion?
Latent defect in machinery? (Is fuel “in machinery”)?
Crew Negligence – Supervision? Causative? Due diligence?
 Proximate cause? Worn engine parts?
More than one supply of fuel? How many events?
Who is the “assured” - who did not tell the crew Cat fines in fuel?
Defences?
Misrepresentation-Non-disclosure?
Wilful Misconduct?
Wear + Tear?
Lack of a Fortuity?
 Underwriters deal with problem?
Advise/Questionnaire on fuel management for Assureds?
Exclusion/Write Back?
Fuel Management Regime Clause/Warranty?
A hearty dog’s breakfast for lawyers

What else is currently being done?
The Joint Hull Committee have recently formed a working
group to address the concerns of the Market on the
increasing amount of claims due to Cat Fines, Class,
Regulatory Bodies and Engine Manufacturers have been
consulted in order to provide a satisfactory solution to the
problem for everyone.
u/w + diligent assured
JH 2013/00X
Fuel cat fines - problems and mitigation
Paul Hill
Chief Surveyor, Western Europe,
Braemar (inc The Salvage Association)
John L. David
Marine Investigator + Consultant,

Fuel Cat Fines - Problems and Mitigation: Paul Hill

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fuel Cat Fines - Problems and Mitigation: Paul Hill

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fuel Cat Fines - Problems and Mitigation: Paul Hill

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fuel cat fines - problems and mitigation

The main components affected are cylinder

Embedded cat fine

The effect of cat fines embedded in

1 % Sulphur in fuel oil at present

29 Average Worldwide Cat Fines Trend

Statistics courtesy of DNVPS

ISO 8217: 2012

ISO 8217 Standards

1996 (2nd Edition) maximum 80 ppm

“..anyhow, all ships are built with a fuel treatment system

 “The 2 tugs should be with the casualty in about 9 days”

A hearty dog’s breakfast for lawyers

You might also like