Banning Cellphones While Driving

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Running head: BANNING THE USE OF CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 1

Banning the Use of Cell Phones While Driving

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation
BANNING THE USE OF CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 2

Banning the Use of Cell Phones While Driving

Driving is categorized among the occupational hazards when a momentary lapse in

concentration can have disastrous results. Distracted driving is a killer as it leads to reduced

reaction times, thereby causing fatal accidents in situations where keen drivers would have

avoided. More people are dying of avoidable accidents than ever before on the roads as they

fiddle with the phones, stereos and general lack of attentiveness emanating from distractions.

The introduction of social media sites has resulted in frequent updates and a constant desire to

keep on checking. Rarely do today’s drivers keep their eyes entirely on the road unless their

phone batteries deplete or they are in low network areas. The banning of such a killer on the

roads is the most logical thing to do, and the concerned persons should move with speed to

ensure that it happens in all states.

Distracted driving poses a danger to the active mobile phone users and other victims of

circumstances. Just like driving under the influence of toxins, the impaired concentration results

in cutting through lanes on a highway, failure to notice that the vehicles ahead have stopped and

that there are lane mergers ahead (Didier, 2014). Getting the persons to effect individual and

communal responsibility to ensure societal change would help keep the menace off the roads.

Society has no room for distracted driving on the roads as they only bring unmitigated

disaster. Fatalities are entirely avoidable as no phone call, or text is so important that the driver

cannot spare two minutes to pull over and answer (Coben & Zhu, 2013). In the case of

emergency calls, returning such calls after a minute or two and after parking off the road also

results in a quick response.

All human beings are destined to pass away at some time, and humanity has accepted it

as the sad truth. The assumption is, however, that everyone will reach their destiny at the
BANNING THE USE OF CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 3

appointed time, and not through the carelessness of some of us. In essence, motoring is an

invention that has made human beings achieves a mobility that they never had before. It is

indisputable that motor vehicles brought an ease of doing business and communicating than any

other invention before them. However, consigned to the back pages of newspapers is the fact that

with motor vehicles zooming past every outpost across the globe, an immense pain and suffering

follow them. While it is factual to attribute driver distraction as one of the leading causes of

accidents, none of the distractions plays a bigger role than actively engaging with a cell phone

(Dinkelacker, 2005). Hazards of using the phone while driving revolve around the fact that

distracted drivers are dangerous drivers, it disrespects other road users, and that lack of uniform

application of deterrents makes it a societal shortcoming.

When drivers are distracted, they take longer to visualize changes in the smooth flow

of traffic, react slower, and are uncoordinated in their driving thereby becoming a danger unto

themselves. The distracted drivers miss their turns, break suddenly and intrude onto other lanes.

The manual, visual and cognitive abilities are compromised making them momentarily

ineffective (Rosenberger, 2014).

Driving demands inter-communication since drivers indicate and communicate on

exits, lane changes, and other possible hazards. A distracted driver misses the turns, the hazards

and changes lanes that make them intrude into the path of other drivers and eventually

inconveniencing them.

The systems have lacked uniformity in application and resulted in various states

applying the laws sporadically. No state has a comprehensive ban on phone usage while on the

wheels even as it continues to cause fatalities. Unlike driving under the influence of toxins, the

laws in place are not punitive enough to deter texting or calling when driving.
BANNING THE USE OF CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 4

In conclusion, cell phones have emerged as killers on our roads in spite of the fact that

they are avoidable. Texting takes away far too many seconds off the road, and the results can be

too dire to contemplate. There is no justification in losing lives to reply a text that can wait. To

be safe from preventable and distracted driving, a permanent ban on all cell phone use needs to

be in place. There is a great necessity to enact laws that punish the drivers as much as there is

uniformity in driving while intoxicated. States should not let those that use the phone off the

hook lightly; they may kill the next person crossing the road. Such measures reduce the

permanent distraction of drivers and make the road safer.


BANNING THE USE OF CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 5

References

Coben, J. & Zhu, M. (2013). Keeping an eye on distracted driving. JAMA, 309(9), 877.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.491

Didier, J. (2014). Using critical thinking to change distracted driving behaviors. Critical

Thinking across the Disciplines, 29(1), 56-62.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20142915

Dinkelacker, T. (2005). Driving distracted while in your employ: Liability involving cell phones.

The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 8(2), 165-175.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15503461tpmj0802_7

Rosenberger, R. (2014). The phenomenological case for stricter regulation of cell phones and

driving. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 18(1), 20-47.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/techne201461717

You might also like