Urban Rooftop Hydroponics Part II PDF
Urban Rooftop Hydroponics Part II PDF
Urban Rooftop Hydroponics Part II PDF
Problem Statement
Urban Agriculture
It is a widely accepted fact that high yields are central to sustainable food
security given a finite land resource (Godfray et al., 2010; Foley et al., 2011),
thus creating the motivation for innovative agricultural practices such as
urban (e.g., hydroponics) and organic farming. Organic farming is a system
aimed at producing food with minimal harm to ecosystems, animals, or
humans (McIntyre et al., 2009; De Schutter, 2010). On the other hand,
urban agriculture involves the growing, processing, and distribution of
food and its by-products by way of intensive plant cultivation and animal
husbandry in and around cities (Bailkey & Nasr, 2000). The purpose of
urban agriculture is the growing and raising of food crops and animals for
the explicit purpose of feeding local populations in urban areas (Goldstein et
al., 2011). Among the benefits of urban agriculture include increased access
to healthy and affordable produce for urban residents, while creating less
pollution from transportation and waste products (Mukherji & Morales,
2010). However, to make full use of the potentials of urban agriculture, city
officials should consider a more comprehensive approach for incorporating
urban agriculture into their zoning regulations (Mougeot & International
Development Research Centre Canada, 2004). To intensify support for
urban farming, standards that would regulate the permitted urban farming
activities as well as facilitate the sale of goods produced from those regulated
activities should be created (Mukherji & Morales, 2010).
Hydroponics
The word hydroponics was first used by Dr. William F. Gericke in the 1930s.
The term describes the agricultural applications of hydroponics, taken
from the Greek words hydro (“water”) and ponos (“labor”; Agricultural
Information, 2013). Hydroponics is a method of growing plants without
using soil. In hydroponics, plants get their nutrients directly from solution.
This technology is not new. Experiments in growing mint plants without soil
can be traced back to 17th-century France and England. By 1925, the United
States began experimenting with different ways to make plant nutrient
solutions in order to replace greenhouse soil that is difficult to maintain. This
method allows plants to grow two to 10 times the amount in half the time.
Besides the commercial uses, people can grow plants hydroponically
at home by setting up their own system. Home growers need to have the
container in which to grow the plants, water that is mixed with nutrients, a
light source that can be either natural or artificial lighting, a flow of oxygen,
and an appropriate temperature maintained for the type of plant grown.
Hydroponics is therefore a good solution for people who live in urban or
suburban areas and want to grow and produce flower, fruit, and vegetable
crops on a patio, small garden, rooftop, or garage. Many types of plants
are suitable for growing hydroponically such as tomatoes, lettuce, carrots,
strawberries, melons, parsley, and flowers. Growing plants hydroponically
can provide families with fresh, uncontaminated produce that is harvested
immediately before use.
Hydroponic technology produces many benefits in that it is highly
productive and it conserves water and land. Normally, with hydroponics,
plants grow inside enclosures that control temperature, light, water, and
nutrition. Hydroponics is a cleaner way to grow plants and is useful when
land and natural resources are scarce. The plants produced are of better
quality than plants that come from soil because soil contains impurities and
bacteria.
Organic Farming
more than conventional farms during droughts (see Lotter, 2003). It has
been suggested that organic farming could actually produce enough food per
capita to sustain the current human population (UNEP-UNCTAD, 2008).
Organic agriculture can also improve farmer livelihoods owing to cheaper
inputs, higher and more stable prices, and risk diversification (Scialabba
& Hattam, 2002). However, organic farming is often an export-oriented
system tied to a certification process by international bodies; therefore,
its profitability can likely vary between locations and years (Valkila, 2009;
Raynolds, 2004).
There are four types of organic farming models in the Philippines, namely,
(1) indigenous organic farming, (2) traditional organic farming or the pre–
“green revolution” type of farming, (3) large-scale commercial farms, and
(4) the small-scale subsistence organic farming (Carating & Tejada, 2012).
Indigenous agriculture is known to be intertwined with indigenous culture,
customs, and beliefs and has largely remained isolated and unintegrated
into the mainstream of Philippine agriculture. In more ways than one,
indigenous organic farming mirrors natural farming in that they both are a
closed system, which demands no inputs and mimics nature (Mirret, 2001).
Traditional organic agriculture can be considered as a step-up development
from indigenous farming practices. Traditional Filipino organic farmers are
more likely to practice a variation of biodynamic agriculture that revolves
around the concept of treating soil fertility, plant growth, and livestock care
as ecologically interrelated tasks; proponents have described the method
as a holistic understanding of agricultural processes (Abbot & Murphy,
2007). Large-scale commercial organic farming enables local producers to
compete with multinational corporations and afford the cost of organic
certification. They are known to adopt modern organic practices by doing
their own breeding, fertilizer production, and pesticide concoction, vertical
and horizontal integration of operations by waste recycling as they follow
biodynamic and natural farming principles. Commercial organic farming is
not necessarily all on the export trade, as they also focus on the increasing
organic preferences of domestic consumers (Carating & Tejada, 2012).
Conversely, small-scale subsistence organic farming is practiced by small-
time farmers who wish to free themselves from depending on multinational
agro-chemical companies and seed corporations. These farmers breed their
own seed requirements, produce their fertilizers, concoct their botanical-
based pesticides, and practice biodynamic and natural farming principles.
Small-scale subsistence organic farms are into multiple cropping, diversified,
and integrated farming so that they are sufficient in their food needs, selling
the excess to be able to purchase those items needed but could not produce
in the farm. Small-scale organic farmers are likely practitioners of bio-
Conceptual Framework
The present project sought to establish that lettuce grown using urban
hydroponics is comparable in productivity and marketability with
those grown using organic methods in terms of nutrient content and
environmental footprints. Metrics derived from the project include the
amount of nutrient applied per growth output, the nutrient content of the
yield and levels of chemical contamination in urban hydroponics measured
against organically grown lettuce. This project hoped to derive added value to
urban hydroponics crops by generating evidence that hydroponically grown
lettuce is comparable if not better than those that are organically grown in
terms of nutrient content. The comparative levels of contaminants to the
harvested lettuce from both methods were also investigated to illustrate food
safety.
Research Questions
The following research question was addressed: How does hydroponics and
organic farming of lettuce compare with one another in terms of:
Methodology
Table 2 continued...
Analysis of metals in the samples was performed using the Shimadzu Atomic
Absorption Spectrophotometer (AA-6300). One gram each of freeze-
dried vegetable samples and oven-dried soil samples were subjected to dry
ashing and acid digestion, respectively. Dry ashing was done by placing the
vegetable samples on a dried crucible, which were heated using a furnace
set at 480°C for 4 hr. The ash was treated with acid and was diluted to 25
mL using deionized water. Acid digestion of soil samples was done using
a modified method by Badri (1984). Soil samples were placed into separate
Erlenmeyer flasks, which were treated with 25:10 HNO3/HCl. The samples
were placed on a sand bath maintained at 100°C. Digestion was ceased when
the solution turned clear. The samples were filtered and were diluted to 25
mL using deionized water.
Metal standards (Cu, Pb, and Cd) with varying concentrations (0.05 to
10 ppm) were prepared from 1,000-ppm stock solutions to generate standard
curves. Analysis of the standards and samples was performed using the
Shimadzu Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AA-6300). The amount
of metals (ppm) present in the samples was calculated from the standard
curve generated.
water to 0.3. The saponified mixture was extracted with 9:1 n-hexane/ethyl
acetate (20 mL × 3). The organic layer was collected and was evaporated at
40°C under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 4 mL of n-hexane
prior to analysis.
Standards with concentrations ranging from 0 ppm to 200 ppm were
prepared for the standard calibration technique. Analysis was performed
using an Agilent Technologies 1200 Series HPLC with a reversed-phase
C18 column. The equipment utilized a gradient solvent system consisting
of methanol/water at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The analysis was monitored
using a UV detector set at 210 nm for 21 min (Agilent Technologies, 1998;
see Table 3 below). The concentrations of the vitamins were reported in
micrograms per gram sample based on the generated calibration curves.
Injection volume 5 µL
Column temperature 20°C
A = Water
Mobile phase
B = Methanol
At 0 min 90% B
At 15 min 100% B
Gradient system
At 20 min 100% B
At 21 min 90% B (column wash)
Flow rate 1.0 mL/min
UV detector 210 nm
Column Supelco C18 25 cm × 4.6 mm × 12 µm
Analysis of Pesticide Residues From the Harvested Lettuce Leaves and Medium
Used
acetate (MgSO4/NaOAc) were then added to the same tube. The tube was
vortex mixed and was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min. The upper layer
was collected and was transferred into a 2-mL plastic vial. Then, 0.2 g of
Florisil was added to the tube for sample clean-up. The vial was vortex mixed
and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 min. The final extract was filtered by
Millipore and was transferred into a GC vial prior to instrumental analysis.
The amount of pesticide residues was calculated using the internal
standard addition method and was reported as microgram of pesticide
residue per gram sample. The parameters used are summarized in Table 4
below.
Table 5. The Mean Weight of Lettuce Harvested Using Different Farming Methods,
Media, and Containers
Organic
Vitamin Overdosage (mg or µg/d)
Hydroponics Method Recommended
Nutrient or Mineral (Primary Reference Is
Levels (µg/g) Levels daily intake
Information USEPA or USDFA)
(µg/g)
Plants can take up chemical contaminants from the soil or other media.
Contaminants from the soil tend to travel through the plant via absorption
of the roots and adsorption on the surface of plant organs. Although plants
readily contain minerals in their different compartments, they could
accumulate additional metals depending on their physiological capacity
(Peralta-Videa et. al, 2009; Tomas et. al., 2012). Containers used in planting
crops could also affect chemical contaminant uptake. Containers used in
planting vary from woods, tires, metals, plastics, and clay pots (Vick & Poe,
2011). The use of wood does not affect heavy metal consumption by plants
until 1994, when lumber was treated with chromium, copper, and arsenic.
Studies found that these metals could be deposited into the soil and absorbed
easily by plants (Rahman et al., 2004). Plastics are generally used in planting
and have been found to have no effect on metal absorption. However, plastics
that are made of polyvinylchloride may contain metal residues such as lead,
zinc, cadmium, and copper, which are absorbed by the soil and the plant
(Mathe-Gaspar & Anton, 2005).
Some of these contaminants like heavy metals are considered to be toxic
to humans. Copper, cadmium, and lead are the most common heavy-metal
contaminants found in the soil that could be transferred to plants. Copper
though is essential for plants’ cellular processes, but relatively high amounts
may be detrimental to the plant and to those who consume these plants.
Cadmium and lead are found to be more toxic than copper. Nevertheless
Organic
Hydroponics LD50
Contaminant Category Method Reference
Levels (µg/g) (Human)
Levels (µg/g)
United States
20–130 mg/
Cadmium Heavy metal 6.9–11 7.5–11 Food and Drug
kg
Administration
United States Center
Lead Heavy metal 0.22 0.19–0.31 714 mg/kg
for Disease Control
Gram
United States
As heavy quantities
Copper 0.23–0.63 0.63–95.9 Environmental
metal (adult
Protection Agency
individual)
Bioactive
Oxirane, 100–200 mg/ United States Public
compound 6.9–11 7.5–11
tetradecyl kg Health Service
or sterilant
Bioactive
410 mg/kg America Chemical
1,2 Dithiane compound 94 13
(in rodents) Society
or pesticide
United States
Endosulfan Insecticide 0.74–1.46 0.48–1.34 35 mg/kg Environmental
Protection Agency
5 mg
United States Center
Dieldrin Termicide — — per adult
for Disease Control
individual
Conclusion
The results of the present study indicate that the hydroponics method
shortens the growth period although the yield of the organically grown
lettuce is larger and heavier. However, the shortened maturation period
can be translated to more planting seasons and therefore a higher yield. In
terms of nutrient value, there is little or no difference between the lettuce
leaves from both setups. This is also the same observation regarding the
contaminants found in plants from both setups. Overall, data gathered from
these experiments suggest that lettuce plants grown using the hydroponics
method is in fact comparable to organically grown plants in terms of
nutrient content. These findings add value to urban agriculture in the form
of hydroponics because the yield is not only higher but also is comparatively
speaking as nutritious as organically grown plants. The question of whether
hydroponically grown lettuce is safer to eat than organically grown lettuce
is not easy to answer. Apparently, the contaminants found in the lettuce are
a factor of where they are grown and what materials have been used in the
cultivation process. Interestingly, our observations also suggest that plants
are able to pick up chemicals from the environment, so one should be more
aware of his/her surroundings when cultivating plants most especially in the
urban environment.
References
Abbott, L., & Murphy, D. (Eds.). (2007). Soil biological fertility: A key to sustainable
land use in agriculture. Springer.
Agilent Technologies. (1998). Analysis of fat-soluble vitamins by HPLC.
Agricultural Information. (2013). History of hydroponics. agrinfobank.com Team.
Retrieved from http://www.agrinfobank.com/2013/06/history-of-hydroponics.
html
Angima, S. (2010). Toxic heavy metals in farm soil. Oregon State University, 5(3).
AOAC International. (2007). Pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction
and partitioning with magnesium sulfate (AOAC Official Method 2007.01).
Asmellash, S., Stevens, J.L., & Ichimura, T. (2005). Modulating the endoplasmic
reticulum stress response with trans-4,5-Dihydroxy-1,2-Dithiane prevents
chemically induced renal injury In Vivo. Oxford Journals Life Sciences &
Medicine Toxicological Sciences, 88(2), 576–584.
ATSDR. (1990). Agency for toxic substances and disease registry. US Department
of Health and Human Services.
ATSDR. (2002). Agency for toxic substances and disease registry. US Department
of Health and Human Services.
ATSDR. (2013). Agency for toxic substances and disease registry. US Department
of Health and Human Services.
Azzi , A. (2007). Molecular mechanism of alpha-tocopherol action. Free Radical
Biology and Medicine, 43(1), 16–21.
Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, M.J., Avilés-
Vázquez, K., Samulon, A., & Perfecto, I. (2006). Organic agriculture and the
global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 22(2), 86–108.
Badri, M.A. (1984). Identification of heavy metal toxicology levels in soil waste
by chemical speciation. Conservation Recycling, 7(2), 25–270.
Bailkey, M., & Nasr, J. (1999/2000). From brownfields to greenfields: Producing
food in North American cities. Community Food Security News, (6).
Bengtsson, J., Ahnstro, M.J., & Weibull, A.C. (2005). The effects of organic
agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Applied Ecology, 42, 261–269.
Besharat, S., Besharat, M., & Jabarri, A. (2009). Wild lettuce (Lactuca virosa)
toxicity. BMJ Case Reports. BMJ Group. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031874/