Chapter Four Data Analysis, Presentation, Interpretation and Discussion
Chapter Four Data Analysis, Presentation, Interpretation and Discussion
Chapter Four Data Analysis, Presentation, Interpretation and Discussion
4.0: Introduction
This chapter presents the results of the study broken down into the following thematic
subsections; questionnaire response rate, result from the teachers’ questionnaire and
The study used 126 PSTs who included diploma teachers, ordinary certificate teachers
teachers and 42 untrained teachers. The questionnaire response rate and return rate was
42 out of 42 (100%) for the diploma teachers, 42 out of 42 (100%) for the ordinary
certificate teachers and 42 out of 42 (100%) for the untrained teachers. Overall the
giving a total of 126 teachers. The teachers were aged 20 to 40 years with a teaching
experience of 1 to 15 years. All the 126 teachers were females who held form 4
certificate. The characteristics influenced the way the teachers managed class control
with respect to discipline. The characteristics influenced the way the teachers managed
pupils’ seating arrangement as well as learning aids. The characteristics also determined
Different PSTs had different teaching experiences which determined the way the
teachers effected CM. Experience influenced the way the teachers managed class
31
control by maintaining class discipline. The characteristics again influenced the way the
teachers managed pupils’ seating arrangement as well as learning aids for effective CM.
The different teaching experiences furthermore determined how class records and time
were managed by the teachers. Teachers with longer experience managed classrooms
Classroom rules are an aspect of CM and are useful in guiding pupils’ discipline.
Teacher experience had influence on classroom rules and hence CM. The respondents
were asked to indicate if there were rules guiding pupils’ discipline in classrooms to
help achieve effective CM. The teachers were also asked to indicate teaching
experience. Table 4.2.1 shows the number of teachers who indicated application of CM
through use of classroom rules against the total number of teachers in each experience
category.
f %
1-3 6 15
4-6 9 23
4-10 12 30
Over 10 13 32
Total 40 100
indicated having classroom rules to guide in CM. 9 teachers (23%) with an experience
32
of 4 to 6 indicated having rules for CM while 12(30%) indicated the same. Again
CM by use of classroom rules. The implication here is that more experienced teachers
Classroom rules are used for guiding pupils’ discipline for effective CM although the
study has revealed that some PSTs did not have the rules. The class whose pupils are
aware of classroom rules is easier to manage than a class without rules because the rules
become a part of pupils’ daily routine. Our data shows clearly that the more experienced
the teachers were the more likely the teachers were to have classroom rules and hence
effective learning can take place. It ensures that pupils are attentive to instruction and
Regarding teaching experience, our findings concur with the statement of a certain
Reward for good behaviour, guidance and counseling are effective methods of
controlling class discipline for effective CM. The respondents were asked to indicate
how frequently the respondents used various methods as a measure of controlling class
33
discipline. Table 4.2.2 shows the number of teachers who practised CM by indicating
use of guidance and counseling or reward for good behaviour as measures of controlling
punishment.
1-3 5 12 4 33 4 66
4-6 11 26 4 33 0 0
7-10 12 29 3 24 1 17
Over 10 14 33 1 8 1 17
Table 4.2.2 shows that out of 42 respondents who indicated using guidance and
11(26%) of the teachers who indicated using guidance and counseling for CM had an
12(29%). 14(33%) of the respondents who had applied CM by use of guidance and
counseling rather than the other methods had over 10 years of experience. The
implication is that more experienced teachers than the less experienced teachers used
guidance and counseling or reward method. At the same time the table indicates that a
higher percentage of less experience teacher used corporal punishment to manage class
discipline.
34
4.2.3: Teacher experience, learning materials and classroom management
learners. Use of materials helps to improve CM by making the teacher well prepared for
lessons. The respondents were asked to indicate how regularly the teachers prepared
various documents as part of teacher preparation. Table 4.2.3 shows the number of
These teachers also indicated preparing lesson plans, record of work and learning aids
on a daily basis. The table shows the number of these teachers along with the teachers’
1-3 8 20 10 21 6 15 8 20
4-6 8 20 10 21 7 17 9 23
7-10 11 26 12 26 13 32 11 27
Over 10 14 34 15 14 36 12 30
to 10 years, 11(26%) applied CM by preparing schemes of work and among the teachers
work. Higher percentages of more experienced teachers than less experienced teachers
35
applied CM by preparing schemes of work. The same applied to lessons plans, records
right time. For example the teachers prepared lesson plans on daily basis which is a
requirement for learning. Less effective teachers either prepared the right materials late
or did not prepare some of the materials at all. According to table 4.2.3, the more
experienced teachers were better prepared for lessons than the less experienced teachers
since the teachers prepared learning materials more promptly than the less experienced
teachers. This was in agreement with Petty (2001) who stated that experienced teachers
do not deal with problems but rather, prevent the problems from occurring by applying
Different classroom activities require different seating arrangements for effective CM.
The respondents were asked to indicate what method of seating arrangement one applied
when administering a test. Table 4.2.4 shows the number of the teachers and teaching
experiences.
1-3 10 20 2 50 0 0 3 60
4-6 10 20 2 50 1 100 2 40
7-10 15 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Over 10 15 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
36
Table 4.2.4 indicates that 10(20%) of the teachers who indicated application of CM by
using desk or table rows had a teaching experience of 1 to 3 years while another
and over 10 years irrespectively. Many teachers did not use the other methods. For
example only 1 teacher and 5 teachers applied CM using used circle or semi-circle and
The teachers with longer teaching experience, according to table 4.2.4 employed CM
by using the different seating arrangements more appropriately than the teachers with
shorter teaching experience. Using the right seating arrangement for a certain activity is
a good CM strategy and indicates that the teacher is organized. For instance, it would be
very wrong to use Cluster seating arrangement when administering a test because
children might copy each other’s answers making the test futile.
Proper time management helps the teacher to achieve effective CM by utilizing all the
classroom time to the maximum. Utilizing classroom time to the maximum helps the
teacher and the pupils to cover the syllabus within the specified time. The respondents
were asked to indicate what time one commenced and ended lessons daily as an attempt
to achieve effective CM. The teachers also indicated ways of determining what subject
Table 4.2.5 shows the number of teachers who answered applying CM by commencing
lessons between 8.00 and 9.00 am and ending the lessons between 12.00 noon and 1.00
pm. The teachers also indicated using a timetable to determine what they were to teach
during a particular period which is another useful CM practice. The table shows the
number of these teachers along with the teachers’ respective experience in years.
37
Table 4.2.5 Teacher experience and time management
1-3 13 22 11 22
4-6 15 26 12 26
12 26
7-10 15 26
12 26
Over 10 15 26
According to table 4.2.5 majority of the respondents started the lessons between 8.00 am
and 9.00 am. The majority ended the lessons between 12 noon and 1.00 pm. This
implies that the teachers were able to manage time as an important aspect of CM. More
teachers. The table shows that 13(22%) teachers with a teaching experience of 1 to 3
years observed punctuality by starting lessons at 9.00 am or earlier. This was necessary
for effective CM. 15(26%) and another 15 with experience of 4 to 6 and 7 to 10 years
are kept and maintained to make CM easy. Some teachers ignore some of the records
and do without the records. This makes CM difficult. Teacher experience may have
influence on the way the teacher manages a classroom with respect to classroom record.
38
The respondents were asked to state if one maintained classroom records. The
respondents were also asked to state teaching experiences so as to establish the effect of
1-3 4 16 14 24 13 23
4-6 6 24 14 24 14 25
7-10 7 28 15 26 14 25
Over 10 8 32 15 26 15 27
Table 4.2.6 shows that out of 25 teachers who indicated maintaining admission register
yeas while 7(28%) had experience of 7 to 10 years. Out of 25 8(32%) had an experience
This applied to the attendance register and the performance records. Accurate
educational records do not happen by accident. Teachers should maintain the records to
effect CM. The implication here is that older teachers were more effective in CM than
the younger teachers. However the findings have revealed that the difference is not
significant.
39
4.3 Section B: Effects of teacher professional qualifications on classroom
management
effect on CM. The question intended to find out the effect of teacher professional
qualification on CM. The more qualified teachers were expected to manage classrooms
Classroom rules make CM easier since discipline is guided by the rules. The
respondents were asked to state if one had rules about pupil’s discipline in classrooms or
not. The respondents were also asked to indicate professional qualifications. Table 4.3.1
shows the number of teachers who indicated having classroom rules against the total
Diploma 35 35
Certificate 35 35
Untrained 30 30
using rules to manage classroom. Certificate teachers were also 35(35%) of the
40
untrained teachers 30(30%) indicated application of CM by use of classroom rules. The
classroom rules compared to certificate and untrained teachers. At the same time more
management
compared to other methods such as reward for good behaviour and guidance or
counseling. The respondents were required to state how frequently one used various
methods as a measure of controlling class discipline. Table 4.3.2 shows the number of
teachers who indicated using guidance and counseling or reward for good behaviour as
measures of controlling discipline and those who used either corporal punishment or
Diploma 32 36 8 27 2 50
Certificate 31 33 12 40 0 0
Untrained 29 31 10 33 2 50
Table 4.3.2 indicates that out of 92 teachers who indicated application of CM by using
guidance and counseling or reward method for good behaviour 32(36%) were diploma
41
teachers. 31 out of 92(33%) were certificate teachers and 29(31%) were untrained
method for good behaviour. The implication is that diploma teachers were more
efficient than certificate teachers and certificate teachers were more efficient than
untrained teachers in CM. This is because guidance and counseling and also reward for
Regarding teacher professional qualification and CM, one Education Officer said the
following;
The statement supports our study findings which indicate that professional qualifications
influenced classroom management. The data from table 4.3.2 indicates that a higher
percentage of diploma teachers than both certificate and untrained teachers applied CM
classroom management
42
The PSTs were required to state how regularly one prepared various documents as part
of teacher preparation. Table 4.3.3 shows the number of teachers who indicated
preparing schemes of work lesson plans, records of work and learning aids on a daily
basis. The table shows the number of these teachers along with the teachers’ respective
professional qualifications.
Diploma 36 35 40 39 20 45 42 35
Certificate 38 37 40 39 15 33 42 35
Untrained 30 28 25 22 10 22 35 30
According to table 4.3.3 the teachers were more prepared for CM with learning aids
than with other materials. Records of work were maintained by only 45 teachers. The
table shows that out of 104 teachers who prepared schemes of work 36(35%) diploma
105(39%) prepared lesson plans. 20 out of 45(45%) were the diploma teachers who
maintained records of work while 42(35%) diploma teachers prepared learning aids. The
percentages for the diploma teachers were generally higher than those of the certificate
teachers and the untrained teachers. However certificate teachers were better with
The implication is that diploma teachers were more efficient in CM than both the
certificate and the untrained teachers with respect to learning materials. At the same
43
time the study findings revealed that certificate teachers were more efficient in CM than
the untrained teachers. It then implies that professionally trained teachers practised CM
more effectively than the untrained teachers. This could be due to the knowledge of CM
management
Teacher professional qualification could affect the way the teachers arranged the pupils
in the classroom. The respondents were required to indicate what method of seating
arrangement one used to administer a test among desk rows, circle or semi-circles,
clusters and activity zones. Table 4.3.4 shows the number of teachers who indicated
using desk rows or table rows for administering a test and also the teachers who
indicated other methods. The table shows the number of these teachers together with the
Diploma 42 36 0 0 0 0 0 0
Certificate 40 34 0 0 0 0 2 25
Untrained 36 30 0 0 0 0 6 75
Table 4.3.4 shows that 118 respondents indicated application of CM by using desk or
table rows to administer a test. 42(36%) were diploma teachers, 40(34%) were
certificate teachers and 36(30%) were untrained teachers. Table or desk rows is a good
44
seating arrangement for administering a test. This is so because when arranged in
clusters, circles, semicircles or activity zones pupils may copy answers from one
another. The implication here is that with regard to seating arrangement trained teachers
were better in CM than untrained teachers. At the same time the study has revealed that
teachers were asked to indicate what time one commenced and ended lessons daily. The
teachers were also asked to say how one determined what subject to teach during a
particular period. Table 4.3.5 shows the number of teachers who indicated commencing
lessons between 8.00am and 9.00 am and ending the lessons between 12.00 noon and
1.00 pm. The table shows the number of these teachers together with the teachers’
Diploma 41 34 1 25
Certificate 41 34 1 25
Untrained 40 32 2 50
According to table 4.3.5 out of 122 teachers who indicated starting lessons at 9.00 am or
earlier 41(34%) were diploma teachers. 41(34%) again were certificate teachers and
45
effectiveness in CM by starting and ending lessons at appropriate time. This was an
The findings have revealed that all the levels of professional qualifications were almost
were a little more effective than untrained teachers. Certificate teachers on the other
register, attendance register, health record and performance record. The teachers were to
state the purpose for which one kept the records. The teachers were also asked to
indicate any other records that one kept. Table 4.3.6 shows the number of teachers who
indicated applying CM by maintaining these records and also stated the purpose for
which one kept them. The table shows the number of these teachers along with the
Certificate 41 39 40 33 40 33
Untrained 30 28 40 36 40 33
46
Table 4.3.6 shows that 106 respondents had indicated maintaining admission register.
Out of 106 35(33%) were diploma teachers 41(39%) were certificate teachers and
30(28%) were untrained teachers. Out of 122 teachers who maintained attendance
register as a record for CM 42(34%) were diploma teachers, 40 (33%) were certificate
teachers and 40(36%) were untrained teachers. Regarding performance record 41 out of
Record keeping and maintenance is an important aspect of CM. The study finding have
diploma teachers generally performed better than certificate and untrained teachers.
Comparing certificate and untrained teachers, the former performed better in CM with
register.
PSTs were in different age brackets. This could have influence on how the teachers
managed the PS classrooms. Some people are of the opinion that younger teachers are
better in CM than the older ones as the younger teachers have fresh ideas. Others on the
other hand maintain that older teachers are more effective in CM due to the teachers’
experience in life. Questions were asked to determine the effect of teacher age on
classroom management.
Age may have influence on CM with respect to classroom rules. The respondents were
47
The teachers were also asked to indicate age brackets. Table 4.4.1 shows the number of
discipline in class. The teachers were also to indicate the age brackets.
f %
20-25 9 23
26-30 9 23
31-35 11 27
36-40 11 27
Total 40 100
Table 4.4.1 shows that out of 40 teachers who indicated application of CM by using
classroom rules 9(23%) were aged between 20 and 25 years. An equal percentage was
aged between 26 and 30 years. Out of 40 11(27%) were in the age bracket 31 to 35 and
11 more were aged between 31 and 35 years and between 36 and 40 years respectively.
Older teachers applied CM better than the younger teachers in relation to use of
classroom rules. Without classroom rules class discipline would be difficult to manage.
About age and classroom management, one headteacher had this to say;
“All of my teachers are old and are approaching
Retirement age. That is why my school is not performing
well in examinations. I wish I had younger teachers who
could manage classrooms better than the old teachers. The
school would not be lagging behind in performance and I
would escape blame from the education office. Perhaps the
office will understand the problem and post younger teachers
to my school.”
48
This statement does not concur with the study findings which show that a higher
The rate of preparing learning materials was determined by teacher age. Learning
materials are useful for effective CM. The respondents were asked to state how
regularly the respondents prepared various documents as part of teacher preparation for
CM. Table 4.4.2 shows the number of teachers who indicated preparing schemes of
work and other learning materials termly or annually. These teachers also indicated
preparing lesson plans, record of work and learning aids on a daily basis. The table
shows the number of these teachers along with the teachers’ respective age brackets.
20-25 9 23 11 25 8 22 10 22
26-30 10 25 11 25 9 26 11 24
31-35 10 25 10 23 9 26 12 27
36-40 11 27 12 27 9 26 12 27
application of CM by using schemes of work for effective teaching. Among the teachers
aged 26 to 30 years 10(25%) had schemes of work while regarding the age of 31 to 35
49
lesson plans the biggest proportion of teachers who indicated preparing lesson plans was
The table shows that a larger number of older teachers than the younger teachers had
prepared the learning materials in general. The implication is that older teachers were
more effective in CM than younger teachers with respect to learning materials. Perhaps
it was due to life experience as the older teachers were better prepared with learning
materials for CM than the younger teachers. Without learning materials learning would
not be as effective as with learning materials. Generally more than 80% of the teachers
determining how seating arrangement of the pupils is handled by the teacher. The
respondents were asked to indicate what kind of seating arrangement one used when
administering a test among the given seating arrangement. Table 4.4.3 shows the
arrangements for testing and those who used other seating arrangements.
20-25 10 22 0 0 0 0 1 33
26-30 10 22 1 100 0 0 2 67
31-35 12 28 0 0 0 0 0 0
36-40 12 28 0 0 0 0 0 0
50
According to table 4.4.3 10 out of 44(22%) teachers of age 20 to 25 indicated using desk
row or table rows for administering a test. This was an appropriate method for a test and
hence a good CM practice. When pupils are arranged in clusters, circles or in activity
zones when doing an exam the pupils are likely to cheat by copying answers from one
another. Among the teachers aged 26 to 30 10(22%) indicated using desk or table rows
in a test for effective CM. The table further shows that 12 out of 44(28%) and again 12
The table indicates that 1 teacher in the age of 20 to 25 indicated using activity zone
seating arrangement and one teacher in age 26 to 30 used cluster. Among the teachers of
age 26 to 30 years 2 teachers indicated using activity zones which is not an appropriate
teachers could be more experienced than the younger ones and the experience might
make them better classroom managers than the younger ones. The teachers were asked
to state what time lessons commenced and ended daily as an application of CM. The
teachers were also asked to state how one determined what subject to teach during a
particular period. Table 4.4.4 shows the number of teachers who indicated practising
CM by commencing the lessons between 8.00 and 9.00 am and ending the lessons
between 12.00 noon and 1.00 pm which is the recommended time. The table shows the
number of the teachers along with the teachers’ respective age brackets.
51
Table 4.4.4 Teacher age and time management
f % f %
20-25 10 22 10 22
26-30 11 25 12 26
31-35 12 28 12 26
36-40 11 25 12 26
Table 4.4.4 shows that in age 20 to 25 years 10 out of 44(22%) teachers indicated
starting morning lessons between 8.00 am and 9.00am. This was appropriate time since
it was neither late nor very early. It implies effective time management which is part of
CM. Among the teachers of age 26 to 30 years 11(25%) indicated starting lessons at the
ending lessons between 12.00 noon and 1.00pm. Again this was an appropriate time to
end the lesson. Since it was neither early nor late. It implies effective time management
Out of 46 teachers 12(26%) were in each of the other age brackets and indicated ending
the lesson between 12.00 noon and 1.00pm. Though the difference is not so significant
more of the older teachers than the younger teachers were keen about time management
52
4.4.5 Teacher age pupils’ classroom records and management
Preparation and maintenance of classroom records could be affected by the teacher age.
record. The respondents were also asked to indicate any other record maintained to
effect CM. Table 4.4.5 shows the number of teachers who indicated managing
classrooms by maintaining most if not all the records and also indicated the purpose for
which the records were maintained. The table shows the number of the teachers along
20-25 7 24 10 23 8 22
26-30 6 20 10 23 8 22
31-35 8 28 12 27 10 27
36-40 8 28 12 27 11 29
According to table 4.4.5 7 out of 29 (24%) of the teachers who indicated having
admission register were in age 20 to 25 while 6(20%) teachers were in age 26 to 30. 8
out of 29(28%) were in age 31 to 35 while another 28% were in age 36 to 40. The
teachers who maintained attendance register as part of CM were 23% for age 20 to 25
23% for age 26 to 30, 27% for age 31 to 35 and 27% for age 36 to 40 years.
53
The table also shows that out of 37 8(22%) teachers of age 20 to 25 years maintained
performance record for CM. Age 36 to 40 years had 11(29) of teachers who maintained
performance records.
Classroom records support CM as the records guide and remind the teachers what has
been done and what to be done. The records are also important as they show the day to
day development of the child as well as specific issues relating to the child. Some of the
issues include specific behaviours especially those that are a cause of concern.
54