Putu Calista Gitta Kalyana
Putu Calista Gitta Kalyana
Putu Calista Gitta Kalyana
1. Introduction
TPG Telecom Limited is a company operating in telecommunication services in Australia. This report aims
to evaluate the performance of the company, particularly in how well the company generates profit by using
its assets. Three financial ratios are used to determine the company’s performance: ROA, net profit margin
ratio, and asset turnover ratio. The company will be rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 = excellent, 5 =
satisfactory, 1 = very unsatisfactory).
2. Choices of Accounting Policies
a) Basis of measurement
The financial statements of TPG Telecom Limited are accounted on the historical cost basis except
asset and liabilities acquired through business combinations and financial instruments which are
measured at fair value. There is no change on this measurement basis in the financial year of 2013
to 2015.
d) Segment Reporting
As the consequence of AAPT acquisition in 2014, the company added revenue from AAPT as a
separate operating segment. Later in 2015 report, the AAPT revenue was included within the
corporate segment.
e) Depreciation
Depreciation is measured by straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an
item of property, plant, and equipment. The residual value, the useful life, and depreciation method
are reassessed at least annually.
The estimated useful lives of the assets are provided below:
Network infrastructure : 3 – 25 years (in 2013 was 2.5 – 25 years)
Buildings : 40 years
Leasehold improvements : 8 years
f) Amortisation
Amortisation is measured by straight-line basis unless otherwise stated. Goodwill and intangible
assets with an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment at each balance sheet date. The
estimated useful lives of the assets are provided below:
Goodwill : indefinite life
Trademark : indefinite life
Internally generated software : 2 – 20 years (at 2013 was 5 years)
Indefeasible rights of use (IRU) of capacity: amortised over the life of the IRU
Licenses : amortised over the term of the license
Acquired customer bases : amortised on a reducing balance basis in line
with the expected economic benefits to be derived
ROA
ROA is a percentage of Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) divided by Total Asset. This ratio reflects
the entity’s ability to convert sales revenue into profit and the entity’s ability to generate income from its
asset investments. It should be considered that the data provided by Morningstar calculated differently from
the conventional formula. The ROA formula operated in Morningstar calculation is [Net Income + Interest
Expense*(1-Corporate Tax Rate)]/[Total Assets - Outside Equity Interests]. Calculating with the common
ROA formula, the results are as below:
Table 2 Return on Asset (ROA) Ratio of TPG Telecom Limited obtained from conventional formula
The number of ROA calculated by conventional formula is different, yet the trend of ROA movement is
the same. It can be seen from Table 1 and Table 2 that ROA for financial year of 2015 increased relative to
financial year of 2014. This increment was due to increase by 32% in the numerator (EBIT) (from $255.88
million in 2014 to $338.8 million in 2015). EBIT rose because the revenue increased significantly compared
to the previous year.
The contrary happened in financial year of 2014, while the ROA decreased compared to financial year of
2013. Although the EBIT in 2014 was also increased (from $219.25 million in 2013 to $255.88 million in
2014), the increase is only 17% which is not significant compared to the average asset which keeps
improved. The slight growth of EBIT in 2014 was driven by the acquisition of AAPT which did increase
not only revenue but also caused significant increase in operating costs and employment costs.
Table 1 shows that from 2013 to 2014 the asset turnover ratio decreased and from 2014 to 2015 the asset
turnover ratio increased slightly, while in the common formula the ratio rose from 2013 to 2015. The
explanation of this condition lies behind the discrepancy in the calculation of the asset. As mentioned
earlier, AAPT acquisition occurred in 2014. This event causes upsurge in property, plant & equipment value
(added $240.9m) as well as the intangible assets (added $157.6m). Although the acquisition also increased
the revenue, the increment has not been significant compared to the increment of total asset at the end of
the period. Since Morningstar used the total asset at the end of period which is obviously higher than the
average of total asset, the ratio in Morningstar would be smaller than the conventional calculation. In 2015,
the ratio in both calculations increased relative to 2014. The value exceeds the ratio in 2013 and 2014. This
was due to the considerable improvement of revenue in 2015, mainly contributed by corporate sector. The
growth in 2015 can be regarded as an indication that investing in acquisition of AAPT is effective in
increasing revenue.
4. Performance Evaluation
One method to evaluate company performance is by taking the performance of previous financial year as a
benchmark. Even though there was decline in financial ratios, particularly in 2014 where there was sharp
drop in ROA and net profit margin ratio, TPG can be regarded as still being able to maintain its performance
as its ROA successfully bounced back in 2015. The asset turnover ratio was also increasing each year
signifying that the company’s asset efficiency is highly satisfying. The only shortcoming in the financial
ratio of TPG is the net profit margin ratio. Low net profit margin ratio reflects the difficulties of the company
to generate considerable profit. However, it is understandable that there will be necessary adjustment as an
effect of acquisition of AAPT. From comparing all the ratio with previous year performance as the
benchmark, it can be assumed that the company has been able to manage the asset to generate revenue well
but still need to improve the ability to generate profit from the growing revenue. For this evaluation the rate
will be 8 out of 10 scale.
Conclusion
TPG Telecom Limited has an excellent performance in generating profit by using its asset. This was
indicated by the ROA that even though declined in 2014 remains to be able to bounce back to the
approximate value of the initial ROA. The asset turnover ratio demonstrates the most satisfying
performance in generating revenue using its asset. However, most of the revenue are still not producing
sufficient profit as indicated by net profit margin ratio which declined each year.
Appendix