This document summarizes the debate around what constitutes a "sin unto death" mentioned in 1 John 5:16-17. There are two views presented: 1) A sin unto death results in physical death and cannot be prayed for. Examples may include Ananias and Sapphira or the incestuous man in 1 Corinthians. 2) It refers to apostasy, specifically abandoning the original faith. The document leans toward the latter view but notes there are other possible interpretations. It concludes that believers cannot have an infallible view of such situations and should continue praying for all sinners.
This document summarizes the debate around what constitutes a "sin unto death" mentioned in 1 John 5:16-17. There are two views presented: 1) A sin unto death results in physical death and cannot be prayed for. Examples may include Ananias and Sapphira or the incestuous man in 1 Corinthians. 2) It refers to apostasy, specifically abandoning the original faith. The document leans toward the latter view but notes there are other possible interpretations. It concludes that believers cannot have an infallible view of such situations and should continue praying for all sinners.
This document summarizes the debate around what constitutes a "sin unto death" mentioned in 1 John 5:16-17. There are two views presented: 1) A sin unto death results in physical death and cannot be prayed for. Examples may include Ananias and Sapphira or the incestuous man in 1 Corinthians. 2) It refers to apostasy, specifically abandoning the original faith. The document leans toward the latter view but notes there are other possible interpretations. It concludes that believers cannot have an infallible view of such situations and should continue praying for all sinners.
This document summarizes the debate around what constitutes a "sin unto death" mentioned in 1 John 5:16-17. There are two views presented: 1) A sin unto death results in physical death and cannot be prayed for. Examples may include Ananias and Sapphira or the incestuous man in 1 Corinthians. 2) It refers to apostasy, specifically abandoning the original faith. The document leans toward the latter view but notes there are other possible interpretations. It concludes that believers cannot have an infallible view of such situations and should continue praying for all sinners.
F. F. Bruce The question is: what is a 'sin unto 'If anyone sees his hnltheI' eitheI' hef(JI'e or aiteI' Miilll'r's death, death" and how dm's it dim'I' fi'om a committing a sin which is not unto Yet a Chl'istian in such close rappOl't sin which is 'not unto death ',' I have death, hc shall make rerluest, and with the Lord's mind as MiilleI' avoided the RSV wording, because it Cod will gin' him lifE> fix those whosc enjoyed I'ecein'd no guidance that Ill' speaks of a 'mOl'tal sin" and that is sin is not unto death, There is sin should stop pI'aying f()]' that man, I liable to confuse the I'eader, as unto death; I do not mcan that one think, therl:'fiJl'e, that the fiJI'meI' sug- though the distinction weI'e that should {way fiJI' that. All gestion is bette!'. between mortal and yeni;d sins in unrighteousness is sin, but theI'l' is a western mOl'al theoloh')" stemming sin which is not unto death' Postscript: 'when that fi'om the mediaeval schoolmen, (In (l J()hn !i: 1(,', 17'), which is perfect has cOlue' this sense mortal sins are deliberate \vith I'eganl to thc meaning of 1 Cor, and persistent, and depl'ivl' the soul t:):10, discussed in our June issue, of sanctifying grace,) It would be the most I'ecently published commen- anachronistic to I'ead this distinction The believer is not tan' on 1 C()l'inthiwls, In' Cordon D, into the New Testament. Fe~' (Eenlmans, I'atenu;stcr, 18(\7), given a 'God's-eye says this of the \iew that the chaI'is- Is it knUWll bv the result? view' of such a m~ltic signs were to ceasc ,,,ith the The distinction between the two completion of the Ne,v Testament kinds of sin is one which John's I'eadeI's ,,,ere expected to recognizc, situation, so as to I'evelation: 'Civen its classical exposi- tion by B. 13, \vadield, this view has But how could they recognize it except by tlw I'esult:' A sin which know infallibly been iaken over in a variety of ,vavs by contempoI',u'y Ref()l'llleci and Dis- resulted in the sinner's death ,votlld certainly be a 'sin unto death', \\11' whether a person is pensationalist thcologies' (p, G4S, n, 2:3), DL Fee's I'eft'l'ence, I think, is to may th{nk of the incident of Ananias a!l(~l Sapphira: ,vhen Pe1L'r exposed past praying for or \vadield's C()llIllcr/i'il Alil'uc/cs (1~J18: reissued by "the Banner of theiI' sin, it was public, and so ,vas their penalty, \ve may think again of not. Tnlth Trust, 1~)7i), In chapter 1 ('The Cessation of the Charismata') the incestuous man of 1 Cor, ;;:1-13, \vadield maintained that such miI'a- if'the destI'uction of the flesh' in n'I'se culous signs as arc I'econled in the which was from thc beginning' (1 [) is to be undeI'stood in the most J()hn 2:18-23), This suggestion may Nnv Testament authenticated the literal sense, Then there aI'e the apostles as the divinely-authorized well bc right: we may n'cilll what believcrs of 1 C()r, 11 :30, whose ,vas said last month about the iITl'- f(JtmdeI's of the chlllTh and ceased at uncharitable conduct at the Lol'(i's tl'ievahle apostasy envisaged in lfch, the end of the apostolic agc, Any SuppeI' led to the death of sonlt', John (,':'-1-(;, But how does the praying miracles reconll'd since then, he does not !(whid his readers to IJI'ay f()!' held, are ipso Jhelo 'counteddt lllira- believer know that the apostasy is such people, but he does not enCOUI'- irretrievahle-how can it he knmvn, cles', age them to do so: if they have died, when the sin is committed, that it is On fiJl'theI' I'Cflection I also wondeI' if they cannot be restored, But fOI' one BITthren attitudcs have not bcen 'unto death":' The belicvcr is not given wl{o sins in any otheI' way, let them a 'God's-eye \ie,v' of such a situation, influenced by Sil' RobeI't Andl'I'son's pI'ay: so as to kIlow infidlihly whether a argument IJliblished at the cnd of the 'more things aI'e wrought by person is past praying kw 01' not. In nineteenth centuI'Y in Thc Si/Cl/Cl' of pI'ayer thc ahsence of such inf;dlible know- G()d, His \iew W;IS that the miI'ani- Than this Y\lorld dreams of:' ledge, let prayer continue to he lous phenomena of apostolic Chl'ist- oflercd, ianity "eI'Ved as a public witness to Could it be apostasy'? In the dosing yeaI's of his lifl' (~erwge the truth of the gospel only during the That seems to me to he the most Miiller is reconled to have prayed 'tl",ll1sitional period' when 'the testi- probable explanation of the text. But daily fill' the restoration (the son of a mony was addressed to the Jew, but of course there are other ,vays of fi'iel'1(1 of his) who had given up the ceas~d when, thl'Jl'w being ~et aside, understanding it: in paI'tieular, it has evangelical f;!ith of his youth: he was the gospel went out to the Centile been suggestcd that the 'sin unto convinced, he said, that the man's world' (p, 1£;2), Although SiI' death' is apostasy-specifically, the experiences in the spil'itual wilder- Robl'rt's ultra-dispensational ism has apostasy of those who had aban- ness would, hy divine oveITllling, not been gelll'I'ally accepted, SOllle of doned the primitin' and ,mthentic make him a more effective defendeI' its cOllcomitants l'ntl'I'l'd into the message and l'stahlished a new basis of the !ilith when once he was res- ,\'(lrld-\ie>\' of m;ll1Y BI'l'thI'en of an f(Jl' faith and life to replace 'that tOl'pd, But Ill' n('\'('r \vas restored, eadier geneI'ation,