~~l~ Designation: D 523- 89 (Reapproved 1994)E 1

Standard Test Method for

Specular Gloss 1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 523; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case ofrevision, the year oflast revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year oflast reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (•) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This test method has been approved j(Jr use by agencies of the Deparlmenl of Defense. Consult the DoD Index of Spec!fication.1· and
Standards jor the specijic year of issue which has been adopted by the Department of Defense.

0 NOTE-Unit of measurement statement and keywords were added editorially in October 1994.

l. Scope gloss, the standard surface is polished glass.

1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the 3.1.2 specular gloss-the relative luminous reflectance
specular gloss of nonmetallic specimens for glossmeter geom- factor of a specimen in the mirror direction.
etries of 60, 20, and 85" (l-7). 2
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be 4. Summary of Test Method
regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are 4.1 Measurements are made with 60, 20, or 85" geometry
for information only. (8, 9). The geometry of angles and apertures is eh osen so that
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the these procedures may be used as follows:
safety concerns. if any, associated with its use. It is the 4.1.1 The 60° geometry is used for intercomparing most
responsibility o.f the user of this standard to establish appro- specimens and for determining when the 20° geometry may
priate sa.fety and health practices and determine the applica- be more applicable.
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 4.1.2 The 20° geometry is advantageous for comparing
specimens having 60° gloss values higher than 70.
2. Referenced Documents 4.1.3 The 85° geometry is used for comparing specimens
for sheen or near-grazing shininess. It is most frequently
2.1 ASTM Standards: applied when specimens ha ve 60o gloss val ues lower than 1O.
D 823 Practices for Producing Films of Uniform Thick-
ness of Paint, Varnish, and Related Products on Test 5. Significance and Use
Panels3
D 3964 Practice for Selection of Coating Specimens for 5.1 Gloss is associated with the capacity of a surface to
Appearance Measurements3 reflect more light in sorne directions than in others. The
D 3980 Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of Paint and directions associated with mirror (or specular) reflection
Related Materials 3 normally have the highest reflectances. Measurements by
D 4039 Test Method for Reflection Haze of High-Gloss this test method correlate with visual observations of surface
shininess made at roughly the corresponding angles.
Surfaces3
E 97 Test Method for Directional Reflectance Factor, 5.1.1 Measured gloss ratings by this test method are
45-deg 0-deg, of Opaque Specimens by Broad-Band obtained by comparing the specular reflectance from the
Filter Reflectometry 4 specimen to that from a black glass standard. Since specular
E 430 Test Method for Measurement of Gloss of High- reflectance depends also on the surface refractive index ofthe
Gloss Surfaces by Goniophotometry3 specimen, the measured gloss ratings change as the surface
refractive index changes. In obtaining the visual gloss ratings,
however, it is customary to compare the specular reflectances
3. Terminology of two specimens having similar surface refractive índices.
3.1 Definitions: Since the instrumental ratings are affected more than the
3.1.1 relative luminous rejlectance factor-the ratio of the visual ratings by changes in surface refractive index, non-
luminous flux reflected from a specimen to the luminous agreement between visual and instrumental gloss ratings can
flux reflected from a standard surface under the same occur when high gloss specimen surfaces differing in refrac-
geometric conditions. For the purpose of measuring specular tive indexare compared.
5.2 Other visual aspects of surface appearance, such as
distinctness of reflected images, reflection haze, and texture,
1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D-1 on Paint
are frequently in volved in the assessment of gloss (1), (6), (7).
and Re1ated Coatings, Materia1s, and App1ications and is the direct responsibi1ity
of Subcommittee DO 1.26 on Optical Properties. Method E 430 includes techniques for the measurement of
Current edition approved March 31, 1989. Published May 1989. Originally both distinctness-of-image gloss and reflection haze. Test
published as D 523 - 39 T. Last previous edition D 523 - 85°. Method D 4039 provides an alternative procedure for mea-
2 The bo1dface numbers in parentheses refer to the 1ist of references at the end
of this test method.
suring reflection haze.
3 Annua/ Book ofASTM Standards, Vol 06.01. 5.3 Little information about the relation of numerical-
4 Discontinued; see 1992 Annua/ Book ofASTM Standards, Vol 14.02. to-perceptual intervals of specular gloss has been published.

32
 ~ffil; D 523
TABLE 1 Angles and Relative Dimensions of Source lmage and mirror in the specimen position, an image of the source shall
Receptors be formed at the center of the receptor field stop (receptor
In Plane of Perpendicular to window). The length of the illuminated area of the specimen
Measurement Plane of Measurement
shall be not more than one third of the distance from the
oo 2 tan 0{2
Relativa oo 2 tan 0{2
Relativa center of this area to the receptor field stop. The dimensions
Dimension Dimension
and toleran ce of the so urce and receptor shall be as indicated
Source image 0.75 0.0131 0.171 2.5 0.0436 0.568
in Table l. The angular dimensions of the receptor field stop
Tolerance ± 0.25 0.0044 0.057 0.5 0.0087 0.114
are measured from the receptor lens in a collimated-
60° receptor 4.4 0.0768 1.000 11.7 0.2049 2.668 beam-type instrument, as illustrated in Fig. l, and from the
Tolerance ± 0.1 0.0018 0.023 0.2 0.0035 0.046 test surface in a converging-beam-type instrument, as illus-
20° receptor 1.8 0.0314 0.409 3.6 0.0629 0.819
trated in Fig. 2. See Figs. l and 2 for a generalized illustration
Tolerance ± 0.05 0.0009 0.012 0.1 0.0018 0.023 ofthe dimensions. The tolerances are chosen so that errors in
the source and receptor apertures do not produce an error of
85° receptor 4.0 0.0698 0.909 6.0 0.1048 1.365
Tolerance ± 0.3 0.0052 0.068 0.3 0.0052 0.068
more than one gloss unit at any point on the scale (5).
6.2.1 The important geometric dimensions of any
specular-gloss measurement are:
However, in many applications the gloss scales of this test 6.2.1.1 Beam axis angle(s), usually 60, 20, or 85°.
method have provided discriminations between coated spec- 6.2.1.2 Accepted angular divergences from principal rays
imens that have agreed well with visual discriminations of (degree of spreading or diffusion of the reflected beam ).
gloss (10).
NOTE 1-The parallel-beam glossmeters possess the better unifor-
5.4 When specimens differing widely in perceived gloss or
mity of principle-ray angle of reflection, but the converging-beam
color, or both, are compared, nonlinearity may be encoun- glossmeters possess the better uniformity in extent of angular divergence
tered in the relationship between visual gloss difference accepted for measurement.
ratings and instrumental gloss reading differences. NOTE 2-Polarization-An evaluation of the impact of polarization
on gloss measurement has been reported (11). The magnitude of the
polarization error depends on the difference between the refractive
6. Apparatus 5 in dices of specimen and standard, the angle of inciden ce, and the degree
6.1 Instrumental Components-The apparatus shall con- of polarization. Beca use the specimen and standard are generally quite
similar optically, measured gloss values are little affected by polariza-
sist of an incandescent light source fumishing an incident tion.
beam, means for locating the surface of the specimen, and a
receptor located to receive the required pyramid of rays
6.3 Vignetting- There shall be no vignetting of rays that
reflected by the specimen. The receptor shall be a photosen-
lie within the field angles specified in Table l.
sitive device responding to visible radiation.
6.4 Spectral Conditions-Results should not differ signif-
6.2 Geometric Conditions-The axis ofthe incident beam
icantly from those obtained with a source-filter photocell
shall be at one of the specified angles from the perpendicular
combination that is spectrally corrected to yield CIE lumi-
to the specimen surface. The axis of the receptor shall be at
nous efficiency with CIE source C. Since specular reflection
the mirror reflection of the axis of the incident beam. The
is, in general, spectrally nonselective, spectral corrections
axis ofthe incident beam and the axis ofthe receptor shall be
need to be applied only to highly chromatic, low-gloss
within 0.1 o of the nominal value indicated by the geometry.
specimens upon agreement of users of this test method.
With a flat piece ofpolished black glass or other front-surface
6.5 Measurement Mechanism- The receptor-measure-
ment mechanism shall give a numerical indication that is
5 A list of manufacturers of glossmeters can be obtained from ASTM
proportional to the light flux passing the receptor field stop
Headquarters. with ±l % of full-scale reading.

RECEPTOR FIELD ANGLE

CONOENSER --.COLLECTOR
LENS LENS

~ SOURCE FrELD APERTURE

SO URCE

SPECTRAL CORRECTION FIL TER

PHOTO DETE CTDR

FIG. 1 Diagram of Parallei-Beam Glossmeter Showing Apertures and Source Mirror-lmage Position

33
 ~t o 523
TEST
SPEC!MEN

RECEPTOR F!ELD ANGLE

CON DEN SER COL LECTOR

LENS LENS

SO URCE

SPECTRAL
CORRECT!DN F!LTER
PHOTDDETECTDR

FIG. 2 Diagram of Converging-Beam Glossmeter Showing Apertures and Source Mirror-lmage Position

7. Reference Standards lint-free absorbent material. Place the rinsed standards in a

7.1 Primary Standards-Highly polished, plane, black warm oven to dry.
glass with a refractive index of 1.567 for the sodium D line
shall be assigned a specular gloss value of lOO for each 8. Preparation and Selection of Test Specimens
geometry. The gloss value for glass of any other refractive 8.1 This test method does not cover preparation tech-
index can be computed from the Fresnel equation (5). For niques. Whenever a test for gloss requires the preparation of
small differences in refractive index, however, the gloss value test specimens, use the procedures given in Practice D 823.
is a linear function of index, but the rate of change of gloss
NOTE 4-To determine the maximum gloss obtainable from a test
with index is different for each geometry. Each 0.001
material, such as a paint or varnish, use Methods B or C of Practice
increment in refractive index produces a change of 0.27, 0823.
0.16, and 0.016 in the gloss value assigned to a polished
standard for the 20, 60, and 85" geometries, respectively. For 8.2 Select specimens in accordance with Practice D 3964.
example, glass of index 1.527 would be assigned values of
89.2, 93.6, and 99.4, in arder of increasing geometry. 9. Instrument Calibration
NoTE 3-Polished black glass has been reported to change in 9.1 Operate the glossmeter in accordance with the manu-
refractive index with time largely dueto chemical contamination (10). facturer's instructions.
The original values can be restored by optical polishing with cerium 9.2 Verify the instrument zero by placing a black cavity in
oxide. A wedge of high-purity quartz provides a more stable reference the specified position. If the reading is not within ±0.1 of
standard than glass.
zero, subtract it algebraically from subsequent readings or
7.2 Working Standards 6 -Ceramic tile, depolished adjust the instrument to read zero.
ground opaque glass, emery paper, and other semigloss 9.3 Calibrate the instrument at the start and completion
materials having hard and uniform surfaces are suitable of every period of glossmeter operation, and during the
when calibrated against a primary standard on a glossmeter operation at sufficiently frequent intervals to assure that the
known to meet the requirements of this test method. Such instrument response is practically constant. To calibrate,
standards should be checked periodically for constancy by adjust the instrument to read correctly the gloss of a highly
comparing with primary standards. polished standard, properly positioned and oriented, and
7.3 Store standards in a closed container when not in use. then read the gloss of a working standard in the mid-gloss
Keep them clean and away from any dirt that might scratch range. If the instrument reading for the second standard does
or mar their surfaces. Never place standards face down on a not agree within one unit of its assigned values, check
surface that may be dirty or abrasive. Always hold standards cleanliness and repeat. If the instrument reading for the
at the side edges to avoid getting oil from the skin on the second standard still does not agree within one unit of its
standard surface. Clean the standards in warm water anda assigned value, repeat with another mid-range standard. If
mild detergent solution brushing gently with a soft nylon the disparity is still more than one unit, do not use the
brush. (Do not use soap solutions to clean standards, because instrument without readjustment, preferably by the manu-
they can leave a film.) Rinse standards in hot running water facturer.
(temperature near 15ü•F (65.C)) to remove detergent solu-
tion, followed by a final rinse in distilled water. Do not wipe 10. Procedure
standards. The polished black glass high-gloss standard may lO.l Position each specimen in turn beneath (or on) the
be dabbed gently with a lint-free paper towel or other glossmeter. For specimens with brush marks or similar
texture effects, place them in such a way that the directions
6 Gloss standards are available from Byk/Gardner, 2435 Linden Lane, Silver
of the marks are parallel to the plane of the axes of the
Spring, MD 20910 and Hunter Associates Laboratory, lnc., 11495 Sunset Hills incident and reflected beams.
Road, Reston, VA 22090. 10.2 Take at least three readings on a 3 by 6-in. (75 by

34
 ~~ o 523
150-mm) area of the test specimen. If the range is greater TABLE 2 Standard Deviation of Gloss Determinations
than two gloss units, take additional readings and calculate Degrees of Freedom Standard Deviations
the mean after discarding divergent results as in the section No. of
Type of Within- Between- Within- Between-
Ceramic
on Test for Outliers of Practice D 3980. For larger speci- Gloss, 0
Ti les Labora- Labora- Labora- Labora-
mens, take a proportionately greater number of readings. tory tories toryA tories 8
20 4 40 34 0.4 1.2
11. Diffuse Correction 60 4 40 34 0.3 1.2
85 2 16 6 0.2 0.6
11.1 Apply diffuse corrections only upon agreement be-
Degrees of Freedom Standard Deviations
tween the producer and the user. To apply the correction, No. of
Type of Within- Between- Within- Between-
subtract it from the glossmeter reading. To measure the Gloss, 0
Painted
Panels Labora- Labora- Labora- Labora-
correction, illuminate the specimen perpendicularly and tory tories toryA tories 8
view at the incident angle with the receiver aperture specified 20 8 80 72 0.6 2.2
in 6.2 for the corresponding geometry. To compute the 60 22 220 136 0.3 1.2
correction, multiply the 45", o· directional reflectance ofthe 85 6 48 18 0.3 2.4
specimen, determined in accordance with Test Method E 97, A Single determinations.
8
by the effective fraction ofthe luminous flux reflected by the For means of three detenminations.
perfect diffuse reflector and accepted by the receiver aper-
ture. The luminous flux entering the receiver aperture from TABLE 3 Maximum Acceptable Differences for Two Results
the perfect white diffusor would give the following gloss Repeatability Reproducibility
indications for each of the geometries: Type of (Within Laboratories)A (Between Laboratories) 8
Geometry, • Gloss of Perfect White Diffuser Gloss, o Ceramic Painted Ceramic Painted
Ti les Panels Ti les Panels
60 2.5
20 1.2 20 1.1 1.7 3.5 6.4
85 0.03 60 0.9 0.9 3.4 3.5
85 0.6 0.8 2.0 7.2
12. Report A Single determinations.
8
For means of three determinations.
12.1 Report the information following:
12.1.1 Mean specular gloss readings and the geometry
used. 13.1.1 Repeatability-Two results, each of which are
12.1.2 If uniformity of surface is of interest, the presence single determinations obtained on the same specimen by the
of any specimen that exhibits gloss readings varying by more same operator, should be considered suspect ifthey differ by
than 5% from their mean. more than the maximum acceptable differences given in
12.1.3 Where preparation of the test specimen has been Table 3.
necessary, a description or identification of the method of 13.1.2 Reproducibility-Two results, each the mean of
preparation. three determinations, obtained on the same specimen by
12.1.4 Manufacturer's name and model designation ofthe different laboratories should be considered suspect if they
glossmeter. differ by more than the maximum acceptable differences
12.1.5 Working standard or standards of gloss used. given in Table 3. This does not include variability due to
preparation of panels in different laboratories.
13. Precision NOTE 5-For sorne types of paint, particularly semi-gloss, the
13.1 On the basis of studies of this test method by severa! measured gloss is affected by method of film preparation and drying
laboratories in which single determinations were made on conditions so that the reproducibility of results from such materials may
different days on severa! ceramic tiles and painted panels dif- be poorer than the values given in Table 3.
fering in visually perceived gloss, the pooled within-labo-
ratory and between-laboratories standard deviations were 14. Keywords
found to be those shown in Table 2. Based on these standard 14.1 appearance; directional reflectance factor; gloss;
deviations, the following criteria should be used for judging goniophotometry; high gloss; relative luminous reflectance
the acceptability of results at the 95 % confidence leve!: factor; specular gloss

REFERENCES

(1) Hunter, R. S., "Methods of Determining Gloss," Proceedings, March 1939, p. 11. A comparison is made ofseveral geometrically
ASTM, Vol 36, 1936, Part II, p. 783. Also, Journal of Research, different photometric scales for separating paint finishes for gloss.
Nat. Bureau Standards, Vol 18, No. 1, January 1937, p. 19 The geometric conditions oftest later incorporated in Test Method
(Research Paper RP958). Six somewhat different appearance D 523 are recommended.
attributes are shown to be variously associated with gloss. There- (3) Wetlaufer, L. A., and Scott, W. E., "The Measurement of Gloss,"
fore, as many as six different photometric scales may be required to Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Analytical Edition, Vol 12,
handle all gloss measurement problems. (This paper is out of November 1940, p. 647. A goniophotometric study of a number of
print). paint finishes illuminated at 45•; a study of gloss readings affected
(2) Hunter, R. S., and Judd, D. B., "Development of a Method of by variation of aperture for 45 and 60• incidence.
Classifying Paint According to Gloss," ASTM Bulletin, No. 97,

35
 ~t D 523
(4) Hunter, R. S., "The Gloss Measurement ofPaint Finishes," ASTM (8) Homing, S. C., and Morse, M. P., "Measurement of the Gloss of
Bulletin, No. 150, January 1948, p. 72. History of Test Method Paint Panels," Ojficial Digest, Federation of Paint and Vamish
D 523. Production Clubs, March 1947, p. 153. A study of the effect of
(5) Hammond, H. K., III, and Nimerroff, I., "Measurement of geometric conditions on results of gloss tests with special attention
Sixty-Degree Specular Gloss," Journal of Research, Nat. Bureau to high-gloss panels.
(9) Huey, S., Hunter, R. S., Schreckendgust, J. G., and Hammond, H.
Standards. A study ofthe effect of aperture variation on glossmeter
K., III, "Symposium on Gloss Measurement," Ojjicial Digest, Vol
readings, including definitions of terms used in connection with 36, No. 4 71, April 1964, p. 343. Contains discussion of industrial
specular gloss measurement, the Fresnel equation in a form readily experience in measurement of 60" specular gloss (Huey), high-gloss
usable for computation, and the deviation of diffuse correction measurement (Hunter), evaluation of low-gloss finishes with 85"
formulas. sheen measurements (Schreckendgust), and gloss standards and
(6) Hunter, R. S., "Gloss Evaluation of Materials," ASTM Bulletin, glossmeter standardization (Hammond).
No. 186, December 1952, p. 48. A study of the history of gloss (10) Billmeyer, F. W., Jr., O'Donnell, F. X. D., "Visual Gloss Scaling
methods in ASTM and other societies, describing the background and Multidimensional Scaling Analysis of Painted Specimens,"
Color Research and Application, Vol 12, 1987, pp 315-326.
in the choice of geometry of these methods. Contains photographs
Compares visual difference ratings with instrumental measure-
depicting gloss characteristics of a variety of methods.
ments of specular gloss, distinctness of image gloss, and haze for
(7) Hunter, R. S., The Measurement of Appearance, Wiley- series of black, gray, and white painted specimens. The data are
Interscience, New York, 1975, Chapter 6, "Scales for Gloss and analyzed by multidimensional scaling.
Other Geometric Attributes," and Chapter 13, "Instruments for the (ll) Budde, W., "Stability Problems in Gloss Measurements," Journal
Geometric Attributes of Object Appearance." ofCoatings Technology, Vol 52, June 1980, pp. 44-48.

The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any ítem mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are express/y advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsib/e technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or tor additiona/ standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments wi/1 receive carefu/ consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. Jf you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you shou/d make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, 1916 Race St., Phi/ade/phia, PA 19103.

36