Chapter-1: Introduction: 1.1 Context and Background of The Study
Chapter-1: Introduction: 1.1 Context and Background of The Study
Chapter-1: Introduction: 1.1 Context and Background of The Study
Public procurement accounts for the lion’s share of government budget especially in
development budgets. The annual volume of public procurement is around $3 billion, out of
which about $2 billion is externally funded. This huge expenditure is now guided by the Public
Procurement Act 2006 and Public Procurement Rules 2008. It can be safely said that this act of
parliament and the rules framed thereon impacts public fund to an extent that all other provisions
in total cannot.
Like every public expenditure, the spending on procurement is audited by the Comptroller and
Auditor General of Bangladesh. This is a gigantic task and auditors face various problems while
auditing this spending. This research will throw light on how to make the procurement audit an
effective one.
Though the new regime was expected to bring about significant changes in line with the
objectives establishing transparency and accountability in the procurement using public funds,
giving equitable treatment and ensuring free and fair competition, the perception of procuring
entities and general public is not satisfactory. Auditing procurement activities is one of the ways
to judge actually what happens to that huge spending. This regime also impacts the way
procurement auditing is being carried out.
For effective audit of procurement activities the provisions related to procurement must be
systematic, comprehensive and flawless. Sometimes confusion arises between procuring entities
and the auditors about the interpretation and application of rules and regulations. It may be due
to lack of clear conception of the either party. This study will identify these issues and provide
recommendations for improvement.
Besides the area of public procurement is relatively under-researched area amongst economists,
lawyers, procurement practitioners and other social scientists (Kashap, 2004). Although public
procurement has a quite long history and the earliest procurement order(found in Syria) dates
from between 2400 and 2800 B.C. to procure 50 jars of fragrant smooth oil for 600 small weight
in grain (Coe, 1989), the area being less attended by the academicians.
Current regime which was introduced from 31st January 2008, aimed at providing for procedures
to be followed for establishing transparency and accountability in the procurement using public
funds, giving equitable treatment and ensuring free and fair competition among all persons
wishing to participate in such procurement process2. So the regime has multifarious objectives
and meeting these objectives is a daunting task. Basically this regime is the extension of the
Public Procurement Regulations 2003 before which there was no unified provision for
procurement and the public procurement legal regime was incoherent and fragmented.
Auditing is of the one the ways that can ensure the propriety of any expenditure. In Bangladesh
all public bodies are audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) of Bangladesh.
C&AG has a constitutional mandate as per Article 128 of the Constitution of the Peoples’
Republic of Bangladesh through which he has access to all documents and stores. Thus statutory
audit has both mandate and scope to oversee this huge expenditure.
Even before the present unified regime auditing was there but the present regime is more
comprehensive and powerful as it is now an act of Parliament. This piece of law doesn’t appear
overnight as it was part of series of reform process undertaken by donor fund back in 2001.
Capacity building with new regime was a key issue. Both the auditors and the personals of
procuring entities have been trained up. Thus to see whether the objectives of the current regime
have been met or not we need to see how the monies are being spent. Auditing which is the
examination of the books of accounts, other documents, stores, assets etc relating to the receipts
and expenditure of the Government should be an effective tool for judging this huge expenditure
related to procurement. Hence this study attempted to examine the effectiveness of auditing of
expenditure related to public procurement in Bangladesh. And this study will add something new
to the existing level of knowledge on procurement practices in Bangladesh.
Questionnaires were distributed face to face almost in all cases to ensure quality of response.
Questionnaires contain both close-ended and open-ended questions enabling them to provide
both quantitative (factual) and qualitative information. Sample questionnaire is given in
Appendix-1.
The area of public procurement being an under researched area, there is paucity of literature
available especially in Bangladesh context. So literature available in the context of other
developing countries are also reviewed. Besides review of the audit reports of the Comptroller
and Auditor General of Bangladesh submitted to parliament for onward disposal at the Public
Accounts Committee have been done. Mentionable that reports that are related to public
procurement and issued after the date of enforcement of Public Procurement Act 2006 and Public
Procurement Rules 2008 i.e. 31st January 2008 have been taken under consideration.
Various articles have been accessed through the websites of the specific country or institutions of
interest or Google search. Google Scholar is used as database to find papers of interest as this
amasses the collection of hits when searching for key words compared to other databases. The
key words that are used to search articles are ‘public procurement’, ‘procurement auditing’,
‘public procurement regime’, ‘problems of procurement auditing’ and ‘effectiveness of auditing’
etc.
Specific Objectives
i. To study the current procurement regime from the view point of an auditor.
ii. To analyze procurement procedures in public institutions in Bangladesh.
iii. To identify the loopholes and challenges that stand against effective procurement and
thus effective audit of procurement.
iv. To furnish recommendations towards effective public procurement auditing.
1. Does the introduction of PPA and PPR as the main public procurement regime enhance
the effectiveness of procurement audit in light of the selected indicators?
Selected Indicators-
i. Meeting challenges to procurement in the public sector.
ii. Sufficiency of current regime related to procurement.
ii. Provisions are well coherent to each other, not contradictory to each other, i.e.
consistency among the provisions.
2. What are the barriers to effective audit related to procurement?