Bialik Institute, Jerusalem / ‫ ירושלים‬,‫מוסד ביאליק‬

/ How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism?

?‫במה נתייחדה היהדות של ספר חנוך‬
Author(s): John J. Collins and ‫ג'ון ג' קולינס‬
Source:
Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls /
‫ מחקרים במגילות מדבר יהודה‬:‫מגילות‬
A Festschrift for Devorah Dimant / pp. *17-*34 ,)‫כרך מוגשים לדבורה (תשס"ח‬
Published by: Bialik Institute, Jerusalem / ‫ ירושלים‬,‫מוסד ביאליק‬
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23438241
Accessed: 30-03-2018 07:10 UTC

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Bialik Institute, Jerusalem / ‫ ירושלים‬,‫ מוסד ביאליק‬is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls / ‫ מחקרים במגילות מדבר יהודה‬:‫מגילות‬.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism?

John J. Collins

The concept of "Enochic Judaism", as a distinct strand within t

Judaism of the Second Temple period, has been popularized in rece
years by Gabriele Boccaccini.1 Boccaccini built on the work of h
teacher Paolo Sacchi, who argued that the generative idea of "Jewi
apocalyptic" was the supernatural origin of sin, as formulated in the my
of the Watchers in 1 Enoch 6-11.2 Boccaccini rightly recognized that the
classic apocalyptic book of Daniel is not oriented to this question, a
that therefore it was unsatisfactory to characterize "Jewish apocalyptic"
in this way. Yet, he argued, the books of Enoch do attest to a traditi
that extended over centuries, possibly beginning as early as the fou
century BCE and extending into the first century CE.3 He recognized th
this was "a complex and dynamic trend of thought... and therefore canno
be fit entirely into a unitary scheme or a universal definition". Yet
generative idea... can be identified in a particular conception of evi
understood as an autonomous reality antecedent to humanity's ability
choose, the result of 'a contamination that has spoiled [human] natu
an evil that 'was produced before the beginning of history'".4
associates this tradition with a movement of dissent within the

priesthood, reflected in the strong interest in the calendar and th

G. Boccaccini, Beyond the Essene Hypothesis: The Parting of the Ways betwe
Qumran and Enochic Judaism, Grand Rapids 1998; "Introduction: The
Rediscovery of Enochic Judaism and The Enoch Seminar", in idem (ed.), The
Origins of Enochic Judaism, Henoch 24 (2002), pp. 9-13; "Introduction: From the
Enoch Literature to Enochic Judaism", in idem (ed.), Enoch and Qumran Origins:
New Light on a Forgotten Connection, Grand Rapids 2005, pp. 1-14.
P. Sacchi, Jewish Apocalyptic and its History, JSPSup 20, Sheffield 1997, pp. 32
108.

Boccaccini, Beyond the Essene Hypothesis, p. 12.

Ibid.

Meghillot 5-6 (2008), pp. *17-*34

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 * 18 John J. Collins [2]

negative reference to the tem

Boccaccini, writings preserved in 1 Enoch were the constitutive
documents of this tradition, but not the only ones. He finds the same
conception of evil in some books in which the figure of Enoch was not
central (Jubilees, Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs) or was even
missing (4 Ezra). He also argues that this Enoch tradition was in fact the
early Essene movement.6
This far-reaching proposal has many facets, and some are more soundly
based than others. The books that make up 1 Enoch are indeed closely
bound together by recurring motifs and allusions.7 Moreover, several of
the Enochic writings envision a distinct group of righteous within Israel.
The Book of the Watchers refers to "the plant of righteousness and truth"
(10:16). In the Apocalypse of Weeks, the elect are "the chosen righteous
from the chosen plant of righteousness" (93:10). The Animal Apocalypse
speaks of "lambs" whose eyes are opened (90:6). Even the Similitudes
of Enoch, which are later in date than any other part of 1 Enoch by at
least a century, seem to envision the righteous as a community. It is
not unreasonable, then, to suppose that these books of Enoch were
composed within a movement of some sort, although continuity becomes
problematic in the case of the Similitudes. The further "Enochic Judaism"
is extended beyond the book of 1 Enoch, however, the more problematic
it becomes. There is surely Enochic influence in Jubilees, and also in the
Dead Sea Scrolls, although in both cases there are also sharp differences
to be accounted for. In contrast, all 4 Ezra shares with the Enoch

Boccaccini, Roots of Rabbinic Judaism: An Intellectual History from Ezekiel to

Daniel, Grand Rapids 2002, pp. 89, 99-103.
An independent formulation of "Enochic Judaism" as a paradigm of regularity
and deviance can be found in D. R. Jackson, Enochic Judaism (Library of Second
Temple Studies 49; London and New York 2004). Jackson distinguishes three
"paradigm exemplars", the "Shemihazah exemplar", focusing on the union of
angels with human women, the "Aza'el exemplar", focusing on improper
revelation, and the "cosmic exemplar", focusing on the rebellion of angels who
were in charge of cosmic phenomena related to the calendar.
See my essay, "Pseudepigraphy and Group Formation in Second Temple
Judaism", in E. Chazon <fe M. E. Stone (eds.), Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The
Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, STDJ 31, Leiden
1999, pp. 4AA8.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[3] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *19

literature is a broad apocalyptic worldview, and I do n

justification for calling it "Enochic". My concern in this articl
is not with the extension of the category, but with the c
Enochic writings in 1 Enoch, excluding the Similitudes, which
later. My question is whether these writings are sufficiently
the context of Second Temple Judaism that we should spea
Judaism" as a distinct phenomenon. This question is closely re
question of sectarianism, but distinct from it. It is possible, i
that a group might have a distinctive understanding of Judais
separating itself from the rest of the people in any decisive w

The characterization of the Enoch literature

Before we proceed with this question, it is necessary to revisit the

characterization of the Enoch literature. Sacchi's notion that the story of
the Watchers, understood as a paradigm for the origin of evil, was
generative for the whole corpus, has been accepted virtually without
question in Italian scholarship. But while this story is undoubtedly
important, and reverberates in later Enochic books, it is only one motif
among many in the Enoch literature.8 A far more balanced account of the
worldview of 1 Enoch has been given by George Nickelsburg, who
argues, quite rightly, that the focal point in all the Enochic books is
the coming judgment.9 The Enochic books share "an apocalyptic
construction of reality" that became common in Judaism in the
Hellenistic period, and that has both temporal and spatial dimensions.
Revelation comes from above, mediated by angels and conveyed to earth
by Enoch. Angelic and demonic forces influence human affairs. The
entire sweep of history can be foreseen by the visionary. The judgment is
not only a cosmic judgment of the earth, but of individuals, who attain

Compare the criticism of A. Y. Reed, "Interrogating 'Enochic Judaism': 1 Enoch

as a Source for Intellectual History, Social Realities, and Literary Tradition", in
Boccaccini (ed.), Enoch and Qumran Origins, p. 340.
G. W. E. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1, Hermeneia, Minneapolis 2001, pp. 37-56; idem,
"The Apocalyptic Construction of Reality in 1 Enoch", in J. J. Collins 81 J. H.
Charlesworth (eds.), Mysteries and Revelations: Apocalyptic Studies since the
Uppsala Conference, JSPSup 9, Sheffield 1991, pp. 51-64.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
*20 John J. Collins [4]

everlasting reward or punish

balanced by a correspondi
ordinary human experien
resting places of the elect.
their emphasis and nuance
other, Nickelsburg's sketch
apocalyptic worldview is shar
writings of the era, includin
There are also some distinc
distinguish them as a corp
include the specific story o
otherworldly geography, nei
the negative reference to t
89:73) implies a rupture with
in Judaism at that time. Th
of this literature, however
revelation, rather than Mos
tradition. This in turn rais
Sinaitic revelation in these
that it looked on the legen
revelation? Or was the inv
literary device in books that
Scholarship on this issue h
the one hand, George Nicke
an alternative to Mosaic Tor
Elliott14 have viewed it as a

See my essay, "Genre, Ideology

in Collins 8c Charlesworth (ed
more generally, my The Apoca
See the review of the debate b
Enoch 17-19: 'No One Has Seen
289-299.

G. W. E. Nickelsburg, "Enochic Wisdom: An Alternative to the Mosaic Torah?",

in J. Magness <fe S. Gitin (eds.), Hesed Ve-Emet: Studies in Honor of Ernest S.
Frerichs, BJS 320, Atlanta 1998, pp. 123-132; 1 Enoch 1, pp. 50-56.
E. P. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism, Philadelphia 1977, pp. 346-362.
M. Elliott, The Survivors of Israel: A Reconsideration of the Theology of Pre

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[5] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *21

The Astronomical Book

The division of opinion is most acute in the case of the foundational

Enochic work, the Book of the Watchers. The Astronomical Book is
probably an older document (from the fourth or third century BCE), but
most of it is taken up with a description of the heavenly luminaries. In
part, this description is a celebration of the order of the universe, but it
also has a polemical purpose: to refute the 360-day calendar known
from the Babylonian astronomical text MUL.APIN and to advocate the
364-day solar calendar.15 The status of the 364-day calendar in pre
Maccabean Judah is uncertain. It is generally assumed that the luni-solar
calendar of later Judaism was already in force, but some have argued that
the solar calendar was observed in the Jerusalem temple down to the time
of Antiochus Epiphanes.16 The Enochic book, in any case, does not
polemicize against the luni-solar, or any known Jewish calendar, and does
not mention the religious festivals, even the Sabbath or the Passover.17
Moreover, it describes both solar and lunar years side by side. The
astronomy of this book is antiquated, by both Babylonian and Hellenistic
standards. This in itself may be something of a statement of defiance in
face of new cultural developments. But it does not seem to be engaged in
any polemic against the Jewish cult or the Jerusalem temple, whether this
was due to the fact that the 364-day calendar was observed in Jerusalem
or to the fact that this text was composed in the Babylonian diaspora, and
was not concerned with Jerusalem temple observance, but rather, as

Christian Judaism, Grand Rapids 2000, pp. 330-332, 529-533; idem, "Covenant
and Cosmology in the Book of the Watchers and the Astronomical Book", in
Boccaccini (ed.), The Origins of Enochic Judaism, pp. 23-38.
See especially M. Albani, Astronomie und Schopfungsglaube: Untersuchungen zum
astronomischen Henochbuch, Neukirchen-Vluyn 1994.
See J. C. VanderKam, Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Measuring Time,
London 1998, pp. 114-115; idem, "2 Maccabees 6,7a and Calendrical Change in
Jerusalem", JSJ 12 (1981), pp. 52-74. See, however, the criticism of this position
by A. Bedenbender, Der Gott der Welt tritt auf dem Sinai: Entstehung,
Entwicklung und Funktionsweise der friihjudische Apokalyptik, ANTZ 8, Berlin
2000, pp. 169-173.
VanderKam, Calendars, p. 26.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *22 John J. Collins [6]

Bedenbender has suggeste

vom Jerusalemer Tempel u

The Book of the Watchers

The Astronomical Book is unlike anything in the Hebrew Bible or in

earlier Jewish tradition. When we turn to the Book of the Watchers,
however, we find plenty of biblical resonance.19 At the core of this book is
the story of the fallen angels, in 1 Enoch 6-11. This is usually regarded as
a midrash on the story of the sons of God in Genesis 6, although J. T.
Milik famously argued that the Enochic story was older than the variant
in Genesis.20 The account of Enoch,s ascent to heaven has various points
of contact with prophetic traditions.21 In his subsequent tour with an
angelic guide he is shown a holy mountain in the center of the earth,
which is evidently Mt. Zion, and beside it a cursed valley, presumably Ge
Hinnom or Gehenna.22 He also sees the Garden of Righteousness, and
the tree of wisdom, from which "your father of old and your mother of
old, who were before you, ate and learned wisdom. And their eyes were
opened, and they knew that they were naked, and they were driven from
the garden" (1 Enoch 32:6). Moreover, the opening chapters of the Book
of the Watchers are a virtual tissue of biblical allusions, and Lars
Hartman has argued that they find their referential background in
covenant renewal ceremonies and that the entire passage must be
understood in a covenantal context.23

Bedenbender, Der Gott der Welt, p. 173.

See J. C. VanderKam, "The Interpretation of Genesis in 1 Enoch*, in P. W. Flint
(ed.), The Bible at Qumran: Text, Shape, and Interpretation, Grand Rapids 2001,
pp. 129-148; idem, "Biblical Interpretation in 1 Enoch and Jubilees", in J. H.
Charlesworth 8i C. A. Evans (eds.), The Pseudepigrapha and Early Biblical
Interpretation, JSPSup 14, Sheffield 1993, pp. 96-125.
J. T. Milik, The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments from Qumran Cave Four,
Oxford 1976, p. 31. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1, pp. 176-177, shows that the Enochic
text follows Genesis 6 quite closely.
Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1, p. 30.
1 Enoch, pp. 26-27; Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch I, pp. 317-319.
L. Hartman, Asking for a Meaning: A Study of IEnoch 1-5, CB NT series 12,
Lund 1979.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[7] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *23

Despite occasional arguments that the Book of the Watch

old traditions independent of the Bible, it seems to me beyon
doubt that, in all stages of its composition, it reflects knowle
parts of the Biblical tradition. This is not to say, howeve
exegetical in intent or that it presupposes the authority o
Torah. James Kugel, who more than any other scholar has
for the exegetical character of the Pseudepigrapha, grants
may well have passed on traditions originally unrelated t
text.24 There is, to be sure, an exegetical element in the story
of the Watchers, the flood is clearly the consequence of the s
by the Sons of God, while this connection is not explicit in
there is no biblical basis at all for the stories of Asael and She
leaders of the fallen angels. The ascent of Enoch and his
extremities of the earth are spun off from the biblical statem
"walked with elohim" (Gen. 5:22) but many of the details
chapters (e.g. the geography of chapters 17-19,25 or the discu
chambers of the dead in chapter 2226) have little basis in bibl
Three kinds of argument have been advanced in support
that the Book of the Watchers presupposes the context o
Torah. First, there are general arguments from the logi
punishment. Second, the sexual sins of the Watchers have bee
reflect the priestly legislation of the Torah. Third, there
accepted argument of Lars Hartman that at least chapters 1
the covenant as their "referential background".

1. The logic of sin and punishment

In his classic study, Paul and Palestinian Judaism, E. P. San
understand the sins of the Watchers from the list of terms in 1 E

The terms in Greek are these: cleanse the earth from all akatharsia

J. L. Kugel, Traditions of the Bible, Cambridge, MA 1998, p. 180; compare

Bedenbender, Der Gott der Welt, pp. 157-163.
Bautch, A Study of the Geography, p. 297, concludes that shared concerns about
disobedience and illicit relationships do not necessarily demonstrate points of
contact between these chapters and the Mosaic Torah.
See M.-T. Wacker, Weltordnung und Gericht: Studien zu 1 Henoch 22, Wurzburg
1982.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *24 John J. Collins [8]

and from all adikia and from all hamartia and asebeia; and
eradicate all the asebeia. While there is no reason to suppose that
the author followed a strict definition of terms, it is likely that
"uncleanness" refers both to transgression of purity laws and to the
moral defilement which comes from certain other transgressions
and that "oppression" (adikia) refers to wrongs against one's
neighbour, while "sin" and "godlessness" are probably translations
of "sin" and "wickedness" in Hebrew or Aramaic and refer

generally to transgression of biblical commandments. While what

is wrong to do is persistently left vague, it seems that the author...
had no unique definition.27

But the sins of the Watchers are not so vague. In the first instance, they
involve promiscuity between heavenly and earthly beings. The
impropriety of such unions might be inferred from Genesis, but it was
not a concern of Mosaic legislation. Secondly, the Watchers sin by
imparting forbidden knowledge to human beings. The knowledge
imparted by Asael was also conducive to violence: he taught men to
make swords, daggers and armor. The focus on illicit instruction is not
especially biblical, let alone Mosaic (Nickelsburg has argued persuasively
that the Asael material reflects the Greek myth of Prometheus28).
Devorah Dimant is closer to the mark when she correlates the sins of the

Watchers with the Noachic prohibitions against fornication, blasphemy,

sorcery, robbery, murder, and violations of animals.29 These prohibitions
were spelled out by the rabbis, and they are covenantal insofar as they are
entailed by the covenant with Noah. But they are not Mosaic, nor are
they distinctively Israelite commandments. They do not "refer generally
to transgression of biblical commandments", although they may
occasionally coincide with them. The frame of reference here is
explicitly pre-Mosaic, and relates to issues of concern to humanity at
large, not just to Israel.

27. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism, p. 349.

28. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1, pp. 192-193.
29. D. Dimant, "1 Enoch 6-11: A Methodological Perspective", in P. J. Achtemeier
(ed.), Seminar Papers of the Society of Biblical Literature, 2 vols., Missoula, MT
1978, vol. 1, p. 328.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[9] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *25

Allusions to the Noachic covenant have also been recog

post-diluvian blessings of 1 Enoch 10:17-19 (cf. Gen. 8:2
Hanson.30 Hanson goes on:

There is a second manifestation of the mythic exten

primordial drama to encompass all of history, in
Enoch 11:1 refers to the blessings of the covenant in
and announces that the very blessings which the bui
second temple under the high priest Joshua and the
Zerubbabel was unable to inaugurate (Hag. 2:6-9)
showered from heaven in the final chapter of the divin

Siam Bhayro has inferred that the understanding of the esch

derived from the Mosaic covenant, and has further argued t
implicit criticism of the Second Temple.32 There may
expression of dissatisfaction with the accomplishments
Temple, but the context is no longer that of the covenan
and Israel. Rather, as Hanson observes, "we witness a ha
all earlier heilsgeschichtliche schemata in the service of a radical
remythologization of Israel's perception of divine activity".33 There is
still a place within this framework for a special people (cf. "the plant of
righteousness and truth" in 10:16), but while the framework is covenantal,
it is cosmic rather than national, and so it differs significantly in emphasis
from what we find in Deuteronomy.
Again, Mark Elliott, in a thematic study that draws indiscriminately
from a wide range of Second Temple sources, regards the punishment of
the stars in 1 Enoch 18 as covenantal, because they are said to transgress
the command of the Lord (1 Enoch 18:15; compare 21:4-6).34 But the
commandments that regulate the movements of the heavenly bodies are
not those given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Here again, while the Book of the

P. D. Hanson, "Rebellion in Heaven, Azazel, and the Euhemeristic Heroes in 1

Enoch 6-11", JBL 96 (1977), p. 202.
Ibid.

S. Bhayro, The Shemihazah and Asael Narrative of 1 Enoch 6-11, AOAT 322,
Munster 2005, pp. 36-37.
Hanson, "Rebellion in Heaven", p. 202.
Elliott, The Survivors of Israel, p. 432.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
*26 John J. Collins [10]

Watchers assumes a covenanta

this is not automatically to be
between God and Israel, as Elli

2. The violation of priestly laws?

The authority of Mosaic law i
relation of the early Enoch lite
influential article, "Fallen An
David Suter argued that at leas
polemic against the Jerusalem
Enoch 6-16, of halakhoth related
21:13-15. In his view, the concer
women and blood reflects a ha

The suspicion of a halakhic int

strengthened when the Gree
that the giants are thought
marriage contracted beyond
It would appear that a socio
rules - is being used to expr
cosmic order is violated by th

In light of the criticism of the

from the period, primarily th
Scrolls, Suter argued that the
directed against priests who poll
beyond the circle of the priest
Recently, Martha Himmelfarb
arguing that the polemic is dir
women from non-priestly famil

D. Suter, "Fallen Angel, Fallen Prie

6-16", HUCA 50 (1979), pp. 115-1
Priest'", in Boccaccini (ed.), The Or
pp. 137-142.
"Fallen Angel, Fallen Priest", p. 1
Ibid., pp. 122-123.
M. Himmelfarb, "Levi, Phinehas, an

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[11] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *27

Watchers is addressing priests gains some force from the o

heaven in the Book of the Watchers is set up as a temp
Enoch ascends to heaven to intercede for the Watchers. He is told to tell

them that "you should intercede for men, not men for you" (1 Enoch
15:2). Intercession is a priestly function.
There is, however, some difficulty in the view that the Enochic passage
is a critique of the Jerusalem priesthood. The sin of the Watchers did not
lie in making inappropriate marriages, with women who were not virgins
or were not from priestly families, but in marrying women of flesh and
blood at all. If this passage was indeed a critique of the Jerusalem
priesthood, the critique would seem to be directed, not against improper
marriages, but against marriage at all, in favor of celibacy. The primary
contrasts in the Book of the Watchers are between Enoch and the

Watchers, between heaven and earth, between the angelic life in heaven,
to which Enoch ascends, and the life of flesh and blood, and impurity, to
which the Watchers descend.40 Concern for purity is certainly an issue
here, but it is not so obvious that the author is concerned with Levitical
rules for priestly marriage. It is noteworthy that Enoch is not called a
priest, but a scribe, even though he undertakes the priestly task of
intercession.41 Scribes were often priests,42 but not necessarily always,
and the choice of designation is surely significant. The text seems to hold
up an ideal of holiness, analogous to angelic life, that is attainable by

of the Maccabean Revolt", JSQ 6 (1999), pp. 1-24 (12). Her argument depends in
part on her interpretation of 4QMMT B 80-82 as prohibiting marriage between
priests and non-priestly families.
See especially M. Himmelfarb, Ascent to Heaven in Jewish and Christian
Apocalypses, Oxford 1993, pp. 14-16.
See my essays, "Theology and Identity in the Early Enoch Literature", in
Boccaccini (ed.), The Origins of Enochic Judaism, pp. 57-62; and "Ethos and
Identity in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature", in M. Konradt 8c U. Steinert (eds.),
Ethos and Identitat. Einheit und Vielfalt des Judentums in hellenistisch-rômischer
Zeit, Paderborn 2002, pp. 51-65.
L. Carlsson, Round Trips to Heaven: Otherworldly Travelers in Early Judaism and
Christianity, Lund Studies in History of Religions 19, Lund 2004, p. 43, goes so
far as to say that Enoch takes on the role of High Priest because he enters the
Holy of Holies.
As emphasized by Himmelfarb, Ascent to Heaven, pp. 24-25.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *28 John J. Collins [12]

human beings, not just by pri

the ideal of "men as angels" th
in Jerusalem or elsewhere, mi
ideal, but it is not so clear that
laws of Leviticus.

The Levitical laws have been invoked as providing the background of

another section of 1 Enoch by David Bryan.44 Bryan observes that in the
Animal Apocalypse "the seer, in building upon the traditional Old
Testament picture of Israel under attack from wild animals and birds,
brings in other creatures, which were not used in the Old Testament to
represent historical figures".45 Several of these animals are regarded as
unclean in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14: the wild boar, rock-hyrax,
ostrich, kite, eagle, raven. These unclean creatures are only used to
symbolize the offspring of the Watchers and Gentile nations. Bryan
contends that "these observations are best explained by regarding the seer
as one whose mentality was shaped and fully governed by the world-view
and inherent symbolism of the kosher rules".46 In view of the setting of
this apocalypse around the time of the Maccabean revolt, such an
inference is not implausible. But here again the correspondences with the
Mosaic Torah are allusive rather than prescriptive. Impurity is indeed an
issue in the Animal Apocalypse, where the author complains that the
offerings in the rebuilt temple after the Exile were unclean (1 Enoch
89:73). But while he complains in general terms of the blindness of Israel
and the violence of the Gentiles, he does not complain about the violation
of Levitical commandments in dietary habits. There is certainly an
engagement with the history of Israel in the Animal Apocalypse (and also
in the Apocalypse of Weeks) that was lacking in the Book of the
Watchers. 1 Enoch 89:29-35 summarizes the Sinai narrative in Exodus.

Yet, as Nickelsburg has observed, "in keeping with 1 Enoch's general

D. Dimant, "Men as Angels: The Self-image of the Qumran Community", in A.

Berlin (ed.), Religion and Politics in the Ancient Near East, Bethesda, MD 1996,
pp. 93-103.
D. Bryan, Cosmos, Chaos and the Kosher Mentality, JSPSup 12, Sheffield 1995.
Ibid., p. 129.
Ibid., p. 169.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[13] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *29

silence on the Torah, the giving of the Law is not menti

author surely knew of the giving of the Law, and there i
against it (Moses, like Noah, is an animal that becomes a
which probably means that he is exalted to an angelic st
here the Torah is not made the explicit criterion by whi
behavior is judged.

3. The "referential background" of 1 Enoch 1-5

The same is true of 1 Enoch 1-5, despite the widespread
Hartman's covenantal interpretation of these chapters. 1
considers the workings of heaven and earth, how "all his work
and do not change, but as God has decreed, so everything
is contrasted with the performance of human beings, who
you have not persevered, nor observed the law of the Lord. B
transgressed, and have spoken proud and hard words with
mouth against his majesty". Consequently, the name of the w
a curse, while "for the chosen there will be light and joy a
they will inherit the earth" (1 Enoch 5:1-7). Hartman com
"there can be no doubt that 1 En. 5:4-9 is carried by the
blessing of the elect and its reverse, the curse of the wicked.
this idea is elaborated in a way that brings to one's mind the
of the Aaronic benediction in Nu. 6 in the Qumran covenant r
as Rabbinic expositions".48 He finds another "marker", or
the referential background of the text, in the location of the
for judgment on Mt. Sinai, the site of the Mosaic covenant-m
acknowledges the potential objection "that the language us
cultic background or a cultic origin, but that this background
a directly 'referential' one which, as such, colors the understa
text". He counters this objection by contending that "it is pre
texts which show the greatest similarities to 1 En. 1-5
terminology and motifs, viz., the Jub. and the Qumran examp

47. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch I, p. 380; cf. VanderKam, The Interpretation

Enoch, pp. 142, 145-146.
48. Hartman, Asking for a Meaning, p. 71.
49. Ibid., p. 123

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *30 John J. Collins [14]

also the ones which represent

has demonstratively played a
that Hartman is mistaking th
interpreting the text on the bas
on the basis of its own syntax
the elect may reflect that of th
transposed here. The referen
explicit: it is the order of natur
has plenty of biblical resonan
owner..." or Jer. 8:7, "even th
but it is not especially Mosaic.
in itself establish a reference
mountain of theophany long b
the Law. In Deut. 33:2, "the Lo
upon us". 1 Enoch 1:3-4 modi
One will come out of his dwel
there upon Mt. Sinai, and he wi
the strength of his power from
Sinai is not the ultimate sourc
giving of the Law. Andreas Be
Sinai ist, wird das mosaische G
regards chapters 1-5 as a "Mos
In 1 Enoch 5:4 we find a reference to "the law of the Lord" without

qualification. The context, however, suggests that this is the law of

creation, or of nature, rather than the specific commandments given to
Moses on Mt. Sinai. Of course the two may be viewed as compatible; the
law emanating from Sinai may be viewed as a formulation of the law of
nature, as appears to be the case in Ben Sira 24 and in Philo.53 But unlike
Ben Sira or Philo, the Enochic writings do not mention the Mosaic Torah

Ibid., p. 124.
Bedenbender, Der Gott der Welt, p. 228.
Ibid., p. 215.
Compare the discussion of Philo by H. Najman, Seconding Sinai: The
Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism, JSJSup 77, Leiden
2003, pp. 129-130: "The unwritten Law of Nature is embodied by written Mosaic
Law".

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[15] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *31

explicitly and do not emphasize the distinctively Mosaic laws des

Israel.

A distinct form of Judaism?

The fact remains, of course, that the "chosen righteous from the chosen
plant of righteousness", or the elect group envisioned in 1 Enoch,
constituted a Jewish sect. (I think the tendency to speak of Judaisms, in
the plural, is unfortunate. Judaism is what all varieties of Judaism have in
common.) They understood themselves as descendants of Abraham, the
chosen plant of righteousness. In the Animal Apocalypse, and in the
Apocalypse of Weeks, it is quite clear that they are an offshoot of historic
Israel. Yet, as George Nickelsburg has observed, the only explicit
reference to the Sinai covenant appears in the Apocalypse of Weeks in 1
Enoch 93:6, which says that "a covenant for all generations and a
tabernacle" will be made in the fourth week. The Animal Apocalypse, in
contrast, which clearly knows the story of the Exodus, refers to the ascent
of Moses on Mt. Sinai ("and that sheep went up to the summit of a high
rock") but conspicuously fails to mention either the making of a covenant
or the giving of the law. At no point is there any polemic against the
Mosaic Torah, but it is never the explicit frame of reference. In this
respect, the Enochic literature stands in striking contrast to Jubilees,
which retells the stories of Genesis from a distinctly Mosaic perspective,
with explicit halachic interests.54 The revelation to Enoch is anterior to
that of Moses and in no way subordinated to it. As Nickelsburg has
argued, "the general category of covenant was not important for these
authors".55 The word is rare. To quote Nickelsburg again:

In short, the heart of the religion of 1 Enoch juxtaposes election,

revealed wisdom, the right and wrong ways to respond to this
wisdom, and God's rewards and punishments for this conduct.
Although all the components of 'covenantal nomism' are present
in this scheme, the word covenant rarely appears and Enoch takes

54. Compare the reflections of VanderKam, "The Interpretation of Genesis in 1

Enoch", pp. 142-143.
55. Nickelsburg, "Enochic Wisdom", p. 125.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *32 John J. Collins [16]

the place of Moses as the

the presentation of this r
revelation - the claim that the books of Enoch are the embodiment

of God's wisdom, which was received in primordial times and is

being revealed in the eschaton to God's chosen ones.56

The understanding of the relationship between the elect and God may be
covenantal, in the sense that it is based on laws which entail reward or
punishment as their consequences, but it is not based on the Mosaic
covenant, which was so widely accepted as the foundation of Jewish
religion in the Hellenistic period.
It is often argued that the reason that 1 Enoch is not specifically Mosaic
is simply a reflection of its pseudepigraphic setting in the pre-diluvian
period. But the choice of pseudonym and setting is not incidental. By
choosing to attribute vital revelation to a figure who lived long before
Moses, long before the emergence of Israel as a people, the authors of the
Enoch literature chose to identify the core revelation, and the criteria for
judgment, with creation, or the order of nature as they understood it,
rather than with anything distinctively Israelite.
The idea of a movement within Judaism that is not centered on the
Mosaic Torah may seem anomalous in the context of the Hellenistic age,
but it was not without precedent. The biblical wisdom literature is
distinguished precisely by its lack of explicit reference to either the Mosaic
Torah or the history of Israel, and it retains this character as late as the
book of Qoheleth, which may be roughly contemporary with the early
Enoch literature. The Book of Ben Sira, which is close to the early Enoch
literature in date, professes that all wisdom is the book of the covenant of
the Most High. But Ben Sira remains a wisdom book rather than an
exposition of the Torah. It pays no attention to the purity laws of
Leviticus, and it sometimes adapts biblical narratives in surprising ways,
most notably in its references to the creation stories.57 4QInstruction, a
relatively early wisdom book found at Qumran, which has many points of
contact with the Enoch literature, clearly reflects knowledge of the Torah

56. Ibid., p. 129.

57. See J. J. Collins Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Age, OTL, Louisville 1997, pp.
42-61.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[17] How Distinctive was Enochic Judaism? *33

at several points. Nonetheless, the Torah is not thematized

in Ben Sira, and the primary guides to wisdom appe
mysterious "vision of Hagi" and the teaching about "the
come" that is transmitted by parents to their children.58 Jud
early second century BCE was not uniformly Torah centered,
those who were familiar with the Torah and respected it as on
wisdom among others.
I would agree then, with Boccaccini and others, that the Enoch
literature reflects a distinctive form of Judaism in the late third/early
second centuries BCE. The distinguishing marks of this form of Judaism
were not only the explanation of the origin of evil by the myth of the
Watchers, but the invocation of the pre-diluvian Enoch rather than
Moses as the revealer of essential wisdom, and the view that angelic life
was the ultimate ideal for humanity. Whether the authors of this
literature were dissident priests is not so clear. Their interest in the
calendar is congenial to such an hypothesis, the Book of the Watchers is
certainly interested in the heavenly temple, and the Animal Apocalypse is
explicitly critical of the Second Temple. Nonetheless, the failure to
characterize Enoch as a priest would be remarkable if the movement were
indeed priestly.
The relation of the authors of the Enoch literature to the sectarian

movement that produced the Dead Sea Scrolls is more complicated.

There is no doubt that the Enochic writings helped shape the worldview
of that sect.59 But there is also no doubt whatever of the centrality of
the Mosaic Torah in the sectarian scrolls. Boccaccini supposes that
"Enochic Judaism" was the parent movement from which "the Qumran
community" split off. Others have supposed that this parent movement is

See the essays in J. J. Collins, G. E. Sterling à R. A. Clements (eds.), Sapiential

Perspectives: Wisdom Literature in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, STDJ 51,
Leiden 2004. Note especially the essay by L. H. Schiffman, "Halakhic Elements
in the Sapiential Texts from Qumran", ibid., pp. 89-100, on the very limited use
of legal material. See also M. J. Goff, The Worldly and Heavenly Wisdom of
4QInstruction, STDJ 50, Leiden 2003, p. 225, with reference to 4Qinstruction: "It
uses the Torah without invoking it as a source of authority".
See my discussion in Apocalypticism in the Dead Sea Scrolls, London 1997, pp.
12-29 and passim.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 *34 John J. Collins [18]

reflected in the oldest strat

hypothesis has its own problem
even the hypothetically early
Mosaic. Enoch is never invoked
scrolls, and while the myth of t
serve as the paradigmatic story o
known from the Scrolls is M
existence that can be reconstru
seems far too simple to identify
the parent group of the sect, an
them as "Essenes".62 But the p
did represent a distinctive fo
among several sources that hel
known from the Dead Sea Scrolls.

P. R. Davies, The Damascus Covenant: An Interpretation of the 'Damascus

DocumentJSOTSup 25, Sheffield 1982; Ch. Hempel, The Laws of the
Damascus Document: Sources, Traditions and Redaction, STDJ 29, Leiden, 1998.
See my essay, "The Origin of Evil in Apocalyptic Literature and the Dead Sea
Scrolls", in John J. Collins, Seers, Sibyls and Sages in Hellenistic-Roman Judaism,
JSJSup 54, Leiden 1997, pp. 288-299.
See my essay "Enoch, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the Essenes: Groups and
Movements in Judaism in the Early Second Century B.C.E.", in Boccaccini (ed.),
Enoch and Qumran Origins, pp. 345-350.

This content downloaded from 149.105.1.53 on Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:10:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms