Department of Social Welfare and Development

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE CONTRACT REVIEW

FY 2019, 1st SEMESTER

NAME OF RATEE : ENGR. LONELYN S. SESE

POSITION : COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE OFFICER III
DESIGNATION (If applicable) :
OFFICE : KALAHI-CIDSS : NCDDP, SRPMO - 2, Lanao del Norte

KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation
Strategic Priorities 30%
1. Improve Access To Basic Social Services
Quantity: 100% of Target 16,625 beneficiaries are benefitting Quantity: 100% of Target 16,625 beneficiaries are benefitting
from KC sub-projects from KC sub-projects
a. 100 % targeted beneficiaries are benefitting from Quality: Households targeted are benefitting from completed Quality: Households targeted are benefitting from completed
KC sub-projects
7%
KC-NCDDP sub-projects based on 2019 plan. KC-NCDDP sub-projects based on 2019 plan. 4
Timeliness : January to June 30, 2019 Timeliness : January to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 100% of all 20 sub-projects funded are completed Quantity: 100% of all 20 sub-projects funded are completed
(Cycle 4 only) (Cycle 4 only)
b. 100% of sub-projects are completed in accordance Quality: SPs are completed in accordance with technical plans Quality: SPs are completed in accordance with technical plans
with technical plans and schedule
9%
(With certificate of completion and acceptance, Certificate of (With certificate of completion and acceptance, Certificate of 2
Turn-over and SPCRs) Turn-over and SPCRs)
Timeliness: June 30, 2019 Timeliness: June 30, 2019
KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Quantity: 100% of _______ Sub-project eligible for SET Quantity: 100% of 49 Sub-project eligible for SET conducted
conducted (prioritizing sub-projects completed from June 2018 (prioritizing sub-projects completed from June 2018 to May
to May 2019) 2019)
c. 100% of sub-projects have satisfactory or better
N/A Quality: Subprojects assessed have SET rating of at least Quality: Subprojects assessed have SET rating of at least
sustainability rating
satisfactory satisfactory
Timeliness: Subprojects eligible for SET assessed 6 months Timeliness: Subprojects eligible for SET assessed 6 months
after sub-project completion (January to June 30, 2019) after sub-project completion (January to June 30, 2019)

1. Ensured participation, transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness in conduct of CEAC Activities

Quantity: 85% of 171 barangays responsive to Community Quantity: 85% of 171 barangays responsive to Community
Volunteers target Volunteers target
a. 85% of barangays provide equal opportunities for
participation to marginalized groups
7% Quality: Leadership positions in community volunteer
committees are held by women
Quality: Leadership positions in community volunteer
committees are held by women
5
Timeliness: January to June 30, 2019 Timeliness: January to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 85% of 5 municipalities attain paid labor target (20- Quantity: 85% of 5 municipalities attain paid labor target (20-
b. 85% of municipalities create paid labor jobs which 30% of total laborers are women) 30% of total laborers are women)
are accessible to women
7%
Quality: Same wage rates for all unskilled labor Quality: Same wage rates for all unskilled labor 5
Timeliness: February to June 30, 2019 Timeliness: February to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 80% of registered satisfactorily grievances resolved

c. 80% of registered grievances satisfactorily in line with GRS
N/A
resolved in line with the GRS timeline Quality: n/a
Timeliness: 5 no. of days (February to June 30, 2019)

Quantity: 100% of _____ target areas have conducted roll out

training on Participatory Local Governance modules Quantity: NONE
1. 100% of roll-out training on Participatory Local
Quality: Right mix of participants: 5 pax from brgy (Chair, Sec, Quality: NONE
Governance conducted on time N/A
Treas, CSO Rep, SB Rep)
Timeliness: Conducted on Time based on Training plan Timeliness: NONE
(January to June 30, 2019)
KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Quantity: ____ City/ Municipal Action Plan

Quality: Includes new projects, commitments for next year's Quantity: NONE
4. Development/ Updating of the City/Municipal budget (ELA, AIP), committed projects in previous year/s that Quality: NONE
N/A
Action Plan (C/MAP) are still for implementation, and adopted by MIAC through SB
Resolution or other document supporting its approval Timeliness: NONE
Timeliness: End of semester

Quantity: ____ Convergence Initiative developed and

Implemented Quantity: NONE
5. Development and Implementation of Convergence Quality: Innovative, purposive, responsive and sustainable Quality: NONE
N/A
Initiative project, program, and approved activity or process initiated by
the team with various stakeholders Timeliness: NONE
Timeliness: End of semester

Core Functions 55%

Quantity: 7 Technical Assistance and Field Coaching

Quantity: 4 Technical Assistance and Field Coaching
Quality:
1. Provide technical assistance and field coaching to Provided technical assistance and coaching to ACT's & MCT's
ACTs in local decision making activities
7.00% Quality: Provided technical assistance and coaching to ACT's 5
Timeliness: July 5; July 9; Sept 10; Sept 17; Sept 21; Oct 23 -
Timeliness: January to June 2019
24; Nov 28 & Nov 29, 2018

Quantity: 51 RFRs (2nd & Final Tranche, 1st Tranche &TAF)

Quantity: 50 RFRs
Quality: Technical
Quality: Technical documents are
2. Review technical documents attached in RFRs 10.00% documents are reviewed
Timeliness:
reviewed 5
Timeliness: July 1, 2018 to
January to June 2019
November 30, 2018
KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation
Quantity: 1 mun. KC-NCDDP area Quantity: 1 mun. KC-NCDDP areas

3. Perform as resource person during PDW, ODM Quality: Perform as resource person during PDW, ODM and Quality: Perform as resource person during PDW, ODM and
and Pre-Imp. Workshop
7.00%
Pre-Implementation Workshop Pre-Implementation Workshop 4
Timeliness: Timeliness:
January to June 2019 August 28, 2018
Quantity: 4 SPs in KC-NCDDP Areas Quantity: 12 SPs in KC-NCDDP Areas

Quality: Inspected NCDDP during Joint inspection and final Quality: Inspected NCDDP during Joint inspection and final
4. Conduct JIR and FIR 7.00%
Inspection Inspection 5
Timeliness: January to June Timeliness: July 16 & 20;
2019 August 15; September 18 to 20; November 26, 2018
Quantity: _____ SPs
Quantity: NONE
Quality:
Quality: NONE
5. Administer SET and FA to eligible SPs ANA Administered SET and FA
Timeliness:
Timeliness: NONE
January to June 2019
Quantity: 5 muns KC-NCDDP Areas Quantity: 13 SPs
Quality: Reviewed
6. Submission of SPCRs to completed SPs forms
and reports required during construction period
8.00% Quality: Reviewed and submitted the SPCR's to RPMO and submitted the SPCR's to RPMO 5
Timeliness: January to June 2019 Timeliness: October 11, 2018
Quantity: 6 CIO Templates
Quantity: 6 CIO Templates
Quality:
Quality:
7. Submission of CIO template report every 15th and Submitted the CIO template on time
30th of the month
10.00% Submitted the CIO template on time 4
Timeliness: August 2, 17 & 31; September 24; October 17 &
Timeliness: every 15th & 30th day of the month
31; November 24; December 03, 2018
Quantity: 13 SPs
Quantity: 2 SPs
8.Conduct random and purposive Sub-Project Quality: Validated
Quality: Validated
inspection to validate and verify the SP and verified the SP implementation Status
implementation status using the supervision and
6.00% and verified the SP implementation Status 5
monitoring tool Timeliness: July 3, 6, 10, 12, 16, 19 & 25; August 3;
Timeliness: January to June 2019
September 26; October 3, 4, 17 & 25, 2018
KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Quantity: 0 Infra NOL

Quantity: NONE
Quality:
Quality: NONE
9. Check and Review Infral NOL N/A Checked and reviewed Infra NOL
Timeliness: NONE
Timeliness: April 30, 2019

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS 15%

Quantity: NONE
Quantity: BUB, IPCDD, CCL
1. Perform other tasks that maybe assigned by the Quality: NONE
N/A Quality: Compliant to applicable guidelines and standards
supervisor
Timeliness: January to June 2019
Timeliness: NONE

Quantity: Weekly Updating of Geotagging Web App

2. Compliance to Reportorial Requirements 5% Quality: Proper updating
Timeliness: Weekly
3
Quantity: 1 IPC & 1 IPCR
Quantity: 1 IPC and 1 IPCR
Quality: Prompt
Quality: All IPC and IPCR have been submitted
3. Submission of IPC/IPCR 5% submission of IPC/IPCR per semester 5
Timeliness: Submitted on time
Timeliness: February 15, 2019 & June 30, 2019
Quantity: All 6 Cluster meetings Quantity: All 6 Cluster meetings (Cluster Meeting)
Quality: 100% attended Quality: 100% attended
4. Attendance to Meetings 5%
Timeliness: Once a month (January to June 2019) Timeliness: Jan. 22, 2019; Feb. 22, 2019; March 22, 2019; 5
April 25, 2019; May 15, 2019; June 17, 2019

TOTAL 100%

Prepared by:

ENGR. LONELYN S. SESE Date : June 30, 2019

CIO III - SRPMO 2
KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Recommending Approval:

GLOFELIA J. UAYAN Date : _______________________

Promotive Services Division Chief

Approved by:

ALDERSEY MUMAR DELA CRUZ Date : _______________________

Assistant Regional Director for Operations
 ANNEX R

RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

4 4 4.00 0.28

2 2 2.00 0.18
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

0.00 #VALUE!

4 4 4.33 0.30

4 4 4.33 0.30

0.00 #VALUE!
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

F
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
4 4 4.33 0.30
r
Te
rp
ao
rn
st
4 4 4.33 0.43 s
m
i
t
t
a
l
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average
M
K
i
an
4 3 3.67 0.26 pu
at
te
as
g
a
n
4 4 4.33 0.30 ,

B
a
c
o
0.00 #VALUE! l
o
d

4 3 4.00 0.32 ###

4 3 3.67 0.37

4 5 4.67 0.28
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

0.00 #VALUE!

3 3 3.00 0.15

4 5 4.67 0.23

4 5 4.67 0.23

RATING #VALUE!
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
 Department of Social Welfare and Development
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE CONTRACT REVIEW
FY 2019, 1st SEMESTER

NAME OF RATEE : ENGR. VON ADAM N. SAMBOANG

POSITION : TECHNICAL FACILITATOR
DESIGNATION (If applicable) :
OFFICE : KALAHI-CIDSS : NCDDP, Baloi, Lanao del Norte

KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation
Strategic Priorities 30%
1. Improve Access To Basic Social Services

Quantity: 100% of Target 6,505 beneficiaries are benefitting Quantity: 100% of Target 6,505 beneficiaries are benefitting
from KC sub-projects from KC sub-projects
a. 100 % targeted beneficiaries are benefitting from KC Quality: Households targeted are benefitting from completed Quality: Households targeted are benefitting from completed
sub-projects
5%
KC-NCDDP sub-projects based on 2019 plan. KC-NCDDP sub-projects based on 2019 plan. 4
Timeliness : January to June 30, 2019 Timeliness : January to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 100% of all 35 sub-projects funded are completed Quantity: 100% of all 35 sub-projects funded are completed
(Cycle 1 – 15 SPs; Cycle 2 – 10 SPs & Cycle 3 – 10 SPs) (Cycle 1 – 15 SPs; Cycle 2 – 10 SPs & Cycle 3 – 10 SPs)
b. 100% of sub-projects are completed in accordance Quality: SPs are completed in accordance with technical Quality: SPs are completed in accordance with technical
with technical plans and schedule
7%
plans (With certificate of completion and acceptance, plans (With certificate of completion and acceptance, 4
Certificate of Turn-over and SPCRs) Certificate of Turn-over and SPCRs)
Timeliness: June 30, 2019 Timeliness: June 30, 2019
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Quantity: 100% of 10 Sub-project eligible for SET conducted

Quantity: 100% of 11 Sub-project eligible for SET conducted
(prioritizing sub-projects completed from June 2018 to May
(prioritizing sub-projects completed from June 2018 to May
2019)
c. 100% of sub-projects have satisfactory or better 2019)
sustainability rating
5% Quality: Subprojects assessed have SET rating of at least
satisfactory
Quality: Subprojects assessed have SET rating of at least 5
satisfactory
Timeliness: Subprojects eligible for SET assessed 6 months
Timeliness: January 15, 2019; June 15, 2019
after sub-project completion (January to June 30, 2019)

2. Ensured participation, transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness in conduct of CEAC Activities

Quantity: 85% of 21 barangays responsive to Community Quantity: 85% of 21 barangays responsive to Community
Volunteers target Volunteers target
a. 85% of barangays provide equal opportunities for
participation to marginalized groups
5% Quality: Leadership positions in community volunteer
committees are held by women
Quality: Leadership positions in community volunteer
committees are held by women
4
Timeliness: January to June 30, 2019 Timeliness: January to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 85% of 21 barangays attain paid labor target (20- Quantity: 85% of 21 barangays attain paid labor target (20-
b. 85% of barangays create paid labor jobs which are 30% of total laborers are women) 30% of total laborers are women)
accessible to women
5%
Quality: Same wage rates for all unskilled labor Quality: Same wage rates for all unskilled labor 4
Timeliness: February to June 30, 2019 Timeliness: February to June 30, 2019

Quantity: 80% of registered satisfactorily grievances resolved Quantity: 80% of registered satisfactorily grievances resolved
c. 80% of registered grievances satisfactorily resolved in in line with GRS in line with GRS
line with the GRS timeline
3%
Quality: n/a Quality: n/a 4
Timeliness: 5 no. of days (Feb. to June 30, 2019) Timeliness: 5 no. of days (February to June 30, 2019)
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

Quantity: 100% of _____ target areas have conducted roll

out training on Participatory Local Governance modules Quantity: NONE
3. 100% of roll-out training on Participatory Local
Quality: Right mix of participants: 5 pax from brgy (Chair, Sec, Quality: NONE
Governance conducted on time N/A
Treas, CSO Rep, SB Rep)
Timeliness: Conducted on Time based on Training plan Timeliness: NONE
(January to June 30, 2019)

Quantity: ____ City/ Municipal Action Plan

Quality: Includes new projects, commitments for next year's Quantity: NONE
4. Development/ Updating of the City/Municipal Action budget (ELA, AIP), committed projects in previous year/s that Quality: NONE
N/A
Plan (C/MAP) are still for implementation, and adopted by MIAC through SB
Resolution or other document supporting its approval Timeliness: NONE
Timeliness: End of semester

Quantity: ____ Convergence Initiative developed and

Implemented Quantity: NONE
5. Development and Implementation of Convergence Quality: Innovative, purposive, responsive and sustainable Quality: NONE
N/A
Initiative project, program, and approved activity or process initiated by
the team with various stakeholders Timeliness: NONE
Timeliness: End of semester

Core Functions 55%

 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

1. Maintains and updates inventory of qualified

suppliers, technical service providers, contractors, QN: 1 Inventory Consolidated Report QN: 1 Inventory Consolidated Report
construction materials pricelists, survey of labor cost QL: Updated, maintained inventory of qualified suppliers and QL: Updated, maintained inventory of qualified suppliers and
rates, material testing and water quality laboratories,
3.00%
received by S/RPMO at the start of 3rd Cycle received by S/RPMO at the start of 3rd Cycle 4
available equipment and rental rates from existing infra T : January 15, 2019 T : January 10, 2019
projects in the municipality

2. Assists community volunteers in their community

QN: 15 Community Procurement QN: 15 Community Procurement
procurement packaging and conducts community
QL: Assisted community procurement packaging of volunteers QL: Assisted community procurement packaging of volunteers
procurement meeting to ensure completeness,
consistency and correctness of technical documents;
4.00% and reviewed completeness consistency and correctness of
technical documents
and reviewed completeness consistency and correctness of
technical documents
4
Provides guidance and coaching during regular fiduciary
T: February 11 - 15, 2019 T: February 11 - 15, 2019
reviews.

QN: 1 Pre-implementation Conference / Workshop QN: 1 Pre-implementation Conference / Workshop

3. Conducts the pre-implementation conference at the
QL: Conducted the pre-implementation conference at the QL: Conducted the pre-implementation conference at the
community before the actual start of construction
community before the actual start construction activities and community before the actual start construction activities and
activities, reviewing the implementation plan, task
assignments, work scheduling, LCC commitments
4.00% reviewed the implementation plan, task assignments, work
scheduling, LCC commitments delivery, and the construction
reviewed the implementation plan, task assignments, work
scheduling, LCC commitments delivery, and the construction
4
delivery, and the construction forms and reports
forms and reports during construction period forms and reports during construction period
required during construction period.
T: March 1 – 30, 2019 T: March 1 – 30, 2019
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

4. Monitors the over-all status of all on-going sub-

QN: 15 visits to all sub-projects of prioritized barangays QN: 10 visits to all sub-projects of prioritized barangays
projects in the municipality and provides technical inputs
QL: Monitored the over-all-status of all on-going sub-projects QL: Monitored the over-all-status of all on-going sub-projects
to resolve issues and problems that may arise during
in the municipality and provided technical inputs to resolve in the municipality and provided technical inputs to resolve
implementation; monitors implementation of the
community procurement plan, environmental and
5.00% issues and problems that may arise during implementation,
and the implementation of the procurement plan,
issues and problems that may arise during implementation,
and the implementation of the procurement plan,
3
construction safety plans; During Sub-Regional Project
environmental and construction safety plans environmental and construction safety plans
Management Team and other local meetings, presents
T: May to June 2019 T: May to June 2019
analysis on the status of sub-project implementation.

QN: 15 Physical Accomplishment QN: 10 Physical Accomplishment

5. Assists in the preparation of the Monthly Barangay QL: Assisted in the preparation of the Monthly Barangay QL: Assisted in the preparation of the Monthly Barangay
Individual and Consolidated Municipal Physical
Progress report for submission to the SRPMO.
5.00% Individual and Consolidated Municipal Physical Progress
Report
Individual and Consolidated Municipal Physical Progress
Report
3
T: May to June 2019 T: May 28, 2019; June 28, 2019

6. Conducts joint and final inspection of completed sub- QN: 15 Joint Inspection
projects with other representatives from the community, QL: Assisted in the preparation of the Monthly Barangay QN: NONE
Municipal Inter-Agency Committee (MIAC), S/RPMO, N/A Individual and Consolidated Muncipal Physical Progress QL: NONE
Commission on Audit (COA), and other Project Report T: NONE
Stakeholders. T: June 1 to 30, 2019

QN: 2 G-3 Reports QN: 3 G-3 Reports

7. Monthly Updating of CBPM G-3 4.00% QL: Updated the CBPM G-3 monthly
T: Every 25th of the month
QL: Updated the CBPM G-3 monthly
T: April 24, 2019; May 25, 2019; June 25, 2019
5

QN: 50 Perfected POs and Contracts QN: 90 Perfected POs and Contracts
8. Submission of perfected POs and contracts to COA. 4.00% QL: Submitted the perfected POs and contracts to COA
T: June 30, 2019
QL: Submitted the perfected POs and contracts to COA
T: June 30, 2019
5
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

QN: 8 submitted and complied NOL (RPMO or NPMO) QN: 9 submitted and complied NOL (RPMO or NPMO)
9. Ensures compliance and submission of Procurement QL: Ensured compliance and submission of procurement NOL QL: Ensured compliance and submission of procurement NOL
NOL.
5.00% 4
T: April 30, 2019 T: May 30, 2019

QN: 100% of 42 ACT NOL have complete and correct QN: 100% of 81 ACT NOL have complete and correct
10. Ensure completeness and correctness of attachments attachments
procurement ACT NOL attachments prior to its
issuance.
4.00% QL: Ensured the completeness and correctness of
procurement ACT NOL attachments prior to its issuance
QL: Ensured the completeness and correctness of
procurement ACT NOL attachments prior to its issuance
5
T: April 30, 2019 T: April 30, 2019

QN: 15 RFRs QN: 15 RFRs

11. 100% submission of error-free RFRs to SRPMO. 5.00% QL: Submitted error-free RFRs to SRPMO
T: February 28, 2019
QL: Submitted error-free RFRs to SRPMO
T: February 28, 2019
4

QN: ___ C/MAP Scoreboard developed and updated QN: ___ C/MAP Scoreboard developed and updated
QL: Most recent accomplishments or interventions provided to QL: Most recent accomplishments or interventions provided to
12. Development & Updating of City/Municipal Action
N/A address the identified gaps and needs reflected in the address the identified gaps and needs reflected in the
Plan Scoreboard
scoreboard scoreboard
T: Quarterly T: Quarterly

QN: 16 Site Validation Reports QN: 16 Site Validation Reports

13. Provides technical advice in the selection of the QL: site validation reports are completely filled-up with QL: site validation reports are completely filled-up with
appropriate technology and renders assistance in the technical recommendations as to the feasibility/non-feasibility technical recommendations as to the feasibility/non-feasibility
conduct of site validation in response to the identified
4.00%
of proposed projects to include geotag photograph of proposed projects to include geotag photograph 4
prioritized community problems
T: January 14 to 25, 2019 T: January 14 to 25, 2019
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation

14. Conducts environmental and social safeguards QL: 16 ESMP & 16 Risk Assessment Reports/barangay QL: 16 ESMP & 16 Risk Assessment Reports/barangay
screening and identifies possible geohazards the QL: conducted environmental and social safeguards QL: conducted environmental and social safeguards
municipality maybe prone to, and assists community
volunteers in preparing the environmental management
4.00% screening and identified geohazards. Assisted the community
volunteers in preparing the environmental management plan
screening and identified geohazards. Assisted the community
volunteers in preparing the environmental management plan
4
plan T: January 14 to 25, 2019 T: January 14 to 25, 2019

QN: 16 Technical Documents/ Attachments QN: 16 Technical Documents/ Attachments

15. Provides technical advice and/or conducts review of QL: provided technical advice and conducted review of QL: provided technical advice and conducted review of
engineering plans, detailed cost estimates and program engineering plans, detailed cost estimates and program works engineering plans, detailed cost estimates and program works
of works for proposed community sub-projects in
4.00%
for proposed community sub-projects to the technical for proposed community sub-projects to the technical 4
adherence to Project technical guidelines and policies
T: January 21 – 28,2019 T: January 21 – 28,2019

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS 15%

Quantity: NONE
Quantity: BUB, IPCDD, CCL
1. Perform other tasks that maybe assigned by the Quality: NONE
N/A Quality: Compliant to applicable guidelines and standards
supervisor
Timeliness: Based on Operational Plan
Timeliness: NONE

Quantity: Weekly Updating of Geotagging Web App Quantity: Weekly Updating of Geotagging Web App
2. Compliance to Reportorial Requirements 3% Quality: Proper updating
Timeliness: Weekly
Quality: Proper updating
Timeliness: Weekly
4

Quantity: 1 IPC and 1 IPCR Quantity: 1 IPC and 1 IPCR

3. Submission of IPC/ IPCR 2% Quality: All IPC and IPCR have been submitted Quality: All IPC and IPCR have been submitted 5
Timeliness: Submitted on time Timeliness: January 30, 2019 & June 30, 2019
 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation
Quantity: All 6 meetings (Cluster Meeting)
Quantity: All 6 meetings
Quality: 100% attended
4. Attendance to Meetings 3% Quality: 100% attended 4
Timeliness: Jan. 22, 2019; Feb. 22, 2019; March 22, 2019;
Timeliness: Once a month (January to June 2019)
April 25, 2019; May 15, 2019; June 17, 2019

Quantity: 2 MIAC Meetings conducted and documented Quantity: 2 MIAC Meetings conducted and documented
Quality: Convened by the Mayor or his duly designated Quality: Convened by the Mayor or his duly designated
5. Conduct of MIAC Meeting 3% representative with convergence concerns discussed and
resolved.
representative with convergence concerns discussed and
resolved.
4
Timeliness: Quarterly Timeliness: Quarterly

Quantity: 6 MAT Meetings conducted and documented Quantity: 6 MAT Meetings conducted and documented
Quality: At least 85 percent attendance rate of all members Quality: At least 85 percent attendance rate of all members
6. Conduct of monthly MAT meeting 2%
with convergence concerns discussed and resolved. with convergence concerns discussed and resolved. 4
Timeliness: January to June 2019 Timeliness: January to June 2019

Quantity: Submission of MAT Minutes of Mtg. Quantity: Submission of MAT Minutes of Mtg.
7. Submission of MAT Accomplishment Report 2% Quality: Accurate and comprehensive MAT Mt.g
Timeliness: End of Semester
Quality: Accurate and comprehensive MAT Mt.g
Timeliness: End of Semester
4

TOTAL 100%

Prepared by:

ENGR. VON ADAM N. SAMBOANG Date : June 30, 2019

 KEY RESULTS/ MISSION CRITICAL OUTPUTS RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quantity, Quality, ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Quantity, Quality,
Weight Timeliness) Timeliness)
Objective, Program, Project, Activity Quantity
Allocation
Technical Facilitator

Recommending Approval:

GLOFELIA J. UAYAN Date : _______________________

Promotive Services Division Chief

Approved by:

ALDERSEY MUMAR DELA CRUZ Date : _______________________

Assistant Regional Director for Operations
 ANNEX R

RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

4 4 4.00 0.20

4 4 4.00 0.28
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

4 4 4.33 0.22

4 4 4.00 0.20

4 4 4.00 0.20

4 3 3.67 0.11
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average
 RATING
F
REMARKS e
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average e
Average
d
b
a
c
k
4 4 4.00 0.12
r
e
Tp
ro
ar
nt
s
4 4 4.00 0.16 m
i
t
t
a
l
M
i
n
4 4 4.00 0.16 u
t
e
s
 RATING
REMARKS K
Weigthed a
Quality Timeliness Average
Average p
a
t
a
g
a
n
4 4 3.67 0.18 ,

B
a
c
o
l
o
d
4 4 3.67 0.18

0.00 0.00 ###

T
4 4 4.33 0.17 r
a
n
s
4 4 4.33 0.17 m
i
t
t
a
l
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average
M
K
i
an
4 3 3.67 0.18 pu
at
te
as
g
a
n
4 4 4.33 0.17 ,

B
a
c
o
4 3 3.67 0.18 l
o
d

###

4 4 4.00 0.16
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average
T
r
a
n
s
4 4 4.00 0.16 m
i
t
t
a
l
M
i
n
4 3 3.67 0.15 u
t
e
s

4 3 3.67 0.11

4 5 4.67 0.09
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average

4 5 4.33 0.13

4 4 4.00 0.12

4 4 4.00 0.08

4 4 4.00 0.08

RATING 3.98000
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
 RATING
REMARKS
Weigthed
Quality Timeliness Average
Average