Pos Rar 2
Pos Rar 2
Pos Rar 2
Victoria Schlie
Positive Psychology
Dr. Haile
HUMOR AND SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT 2
John D. Cameron (2015) wrote the literature review and synthesis piece “Can poverty be
funny? The serious use of humour as a strategy of public engagement for global justice” to
In reviewing 54 studies and publications, Cameron notes that those in society with “negative or
ambivalent attitudes” are more likely to join public discussion when humor is used, suggesting
that they feel less of a threat of rejection for voicing their opinions (p. 275). At the same time,
“cognitive responses to humour... promote changes in attitude” (p. 277). Humor, particularly
self-deprecation and irony (p. 278), simultaneously invites diverse opinion without fear of
rejection and gradually changes negative, disinterested attitudes to positive, invested ones.
People are also less likely to categorize important information as “the ‘worthy but dull
category,’” and therefore lack interest in it, when humor is employed in its conveyance (p. 276).
In fact, Cameron points to psychological research that describes “‘compassion fatigue’ and
of global information (p. 276). The consistently heavy seriousness of serious issues can
ultimately wear down an emotional and interested response to them. Using humor to convey
serious issues can benefit both the affected and unaffected individuals through “the reduction of
stress and the promotion of hope” (p. 279). Consistently conveying information in seriousness
and sobriety leads to an increased sense of hopelessness for the situation while “humour is an
long-term engagement” and avoiding burn out (p. 279). Not only are people more likely to
initiate engagement in serious, important issues when humor is used, they are more likely to
In relation to positive psychology, these studies reveal both humanity’s need for hope for
flourishing and altruism and our need to be accepted by others (conversely: paralyzing fear of
rejection). Positive atmospheres and moods (i.e. humor) encourage positive and sustainable
responses, whereas negative atmospheres and moods (i.e. hopelessness and sobriety) encourage
disinterest and fearful responses. Although this piece focused on humor’s role in social justice
engagement, the effects of humor apply to other topics as well. Any subject that is deemed
important and serious (education, social expectations, finances, etc.) can be more effectively
conveyed through a discerned use of humor. Therefore, teachers and informers of any important,
weighty subject can promote discussion, investment, critical thought, remembrance, and
application of the subject in their informees by utilizing humor. Cameron does admit that humor
has risks of establishing superiority or belittling an issue (p. 280), but that irony and
self-deprecating humor, when used with discretion, are well worth the risks (p. 275).
Self-deprecating humor and irony serve as equalizers for all humans, conveying that the informer
is not superior to the informed, that all opinions are reasonable for discussion, and that the
informer recognizes both the idea of shared hardship among all people and shared happiness and
hope among all people. These effects reveal that humans desire normalization and are
encouraged to take personal action when they know they are not alone in a particular situation or
feeling. On a cognitive, scientific level, this review affirms that humans form stronger memories
of and care more about issues they had an emotional response to. While ‘psychological numbing’
reduces the chance of memory and concern, positive experiences of happiness and laughter can
promote these.
HUMOR AND SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT 4
Reference
Cameron, J. D. (2015). Can poverty be funny? The serious use of humour as a strategy of public