Concepts of Teaching Learning
Concepts of Teaching Learning
Concepts of Teaching Learning
net/publication/272620585
CITATION READS
1 133,669
1 author:
A.H. Sequeira
National Institute of Technology Karnataka
121 PUBLICATIONS 110 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Updates of Impact Factors (SCI, SSCI, EI, F1000, etc) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by A.H. Sequeira on 24 September 2017.
INTRODUCTION TO CONCEPTS OF
TEACHING AND LEARNING
By
Dr. A. H. Sequeira
Abstract
It is an accepted fact that teachers are usually not born but made. Good teachers nurture
their knowledge and skills through constant and deliberate efforts. One of the pre-
requisite to be good teacher is to understand the teaching learning process in more depth.
This facilitates better appreciation of the teaching profession as well as the process of
imparting education. This paper is intended to give an insight into the concept of teaching
and learning for teachers who intend to excel in their teaching career.
Introduction
‘As teachers we tend to think that teaching is all about teachers and our role; in fact the
most important aspects of the educational process are the students and what they learn.’
This leads us to consider what we mean by 'learning'. As you read the educational
literature and, more specifically, educational psychology, you find many differences in
theories and definitions.
Concept of Learning
Learning is about a change: the change brought about by developing a new skill,
understanding a scientific law, changing an attitude. The change is not merely incidental
or natural in the way that our appearance changes as we get older. Learning is a
relatively permanent change, usually brought about intentionally. When we attend a
course, search through a book, or read a discussion paper, we set out to learn!
Other learning can take place without planning, for example by experience. Generally
with all learning there is an element within us of wishing to remember and understand
why something happens and to do it better next time.
Learning Models:
We are often faced with questions such as : Why use models? How to teach? How
student Learn? Answer comes from experience of many people over many years in form
of Models. Such Models can be used by any teacher depending on context. Example:
Pedagogical Vs Andragogical Models. Pedagogical approach teacher dominated learning
situation - Students rather passive. Andragogical approach - emphasis on what the learner
is doing - how adults learn.
Each of these four expectations although stated in general terms needs to be interpreted as
individual needs. Students may vary in age, sex, background, etc. If students treated as
individuals - find out more about them (inside - outside classroom), the greater likelihood
to relate their learning to their needs and improve learning potential. Kindness, empathy
and sincerity always reap rich dividends with adult learner.
E xp erience
e xistin g and/or provided
re
Pr
as pa rt of the learning
mo
ov
p rog ram me
idi
or
n
yf
gm
to r
a te
ra
pa
ria
e
l fo
Pr
In dicating
L earn ing R eflectio n
n eed for
usually skills an d gu ided by th e teacher, u sually
knowled ge and serving to consolidate, interpret,
varying stude nt to d evelop conce pts and the ories,
student perceive attitude s and values,
etc.
applied of the approaches. This Experience, Reflection, Learning Model, they suggested,
embodied the principles that:
The suggestion was that the learning process should be considered in three phases; first,
the student’s experience needs to be followed by, secondly, some organized reflection.
This reflection ensures that the student learns from the experience and also helps, thirdly,
to identify any need for some specific learning before further experience is acquired.
Concept of Teaching:
Teaching is a set of events, outside the learners which are designed to support internal
process of learning. Teaching (Instruction) is outside the learner. Learning is internal to
learners. You cannot motivate others if you are not self-motivated. Motives are not seen,
but, Behaviors are seen. Is learning a motive or behavior? Learning is both a motive and
behavior but only behavior is seen, learning is internal, performance is external.
Objectives are intended learning outcomes written down before the process of instruction.
General Objectives - Statement of instructional intent - student ability in general terms.
Specific objective statement of instructional intent- student ability in terms of specific &
observable. Usefulness of objectives, Elements of objectives, Terminal behavior
Condition, and Criterion / Criteria.
Writers tend to separate learning into three main groups or domains. These are the
psychomotor, cognitive and affective domains. Those skills, which are concerned with
4
physical dexterity, for example changing a wheel and giving an injection, fall into the
psychomotor domain. Both of the tasks do need knowledge but, predominantly they are
physical skills, which need practice. Knowledge and knowing the 'how' and the 'why',
the thinking skills, fall into the cognitive domain. Examples include 'stating the names of
the major bones in the body', 'explaining why we have tides'. Both of these require
thought processes to be accomplished.
The third domain, and one we often neglect, is the affective domain. This is concerned
with attitudes. Examples in this domain include 'the need to eat a healthy, balanced diet',
'the need for equality of opportunity for all', and 'politeness'. These deal with feelings
and emotions and are different from the examples in the other domains.
Affective Learning occurs when these three domains are seen as interdependent. Each of
these domains should be developed as part of teaching/ learning session. Teachers should
be able to define learning objectives in each of them.
Learning in these three domains often needs different teaching and learning approaches.
They are often considered in isolation but in practice learning may occur simultaneously
in all three.
Traditionally the role of the teacher has been as a purveyor of information: the teacher
was the fount of all knowledge. This suggests a picture of students sitting in rows in
front of the teacher who is talking and passing information to students with the aid of a
blackboard, while the students either listen passively or, if the teacher is lucky, take their
own notes.
This, of course, is not true any more. The modern teacher is a facilitator: a person who
assists students to learn for themselves. Instead of having students sitting in rows, they
are likely to be in groups, all doing something different; some doing practical tasks, some
writing, some not even in the room but in another part of the building using specialist
equipment or looking up something in the library. All of the students might well be at
different stages in their learning and in consequence, the learning is individualized to suit
individual requirements and abilities.
This change from the traditional model is the result of a number of factors. First, it is
recognized that adults, unlike small children, have a wealth of experience and are able to
5
plan their learning quite efficiently. Second, not all individuals learn in the same manner,
so that if a teacher talks to students some might benefit, but others might not. Third,
everyone learns at their own pace and not, of necessity, at the pace set by the teacher.
Hence, the individualizing of learning has defined advantages.
Research into the ways that people learn has not provided teachers with any specific
answers. If it had, all teachers would be using the same techniques. However,
researchers have identified that learning is generally more effective if it is based on
experiences; either direct experiences or experiences that have been read about. Of the
two types of experiences, the former is more likely to be effective than the latter. Thus
concepts that are able to be practiced or seen are more likely to be learning. To apply this
in a practical situation in post-16 education and training, learning is more likely to be
effective when it is related to, and conducted in, the knowledge of a student’s (work)
experience.
We need, at this stage, to consider how we as teachers might best provide the experiences
so as to make the learning as easy and quick as possible. We might consider two possible
approaches to the design of a teaching programme.
(i) A programme where the content is carefully derived from an analysis of the
student’s personal, social and/or vocational needs and which is implemented by
you in such a controlled and organized manner that the student is almost certain to
learn, and is aware when the learning has taken place. By this method motivation
is generated by immediate success and the avoidance of failure.
Unfortunately this rarely takes place because it has a fundamental drawback. Apart from
the requirement for the students to place themselves in the hands of the teacher and thus
tend to develop a relationship of dependency, it confirms to them that learning is a
process which is organized by someone who knows better. It does not help students to
learn on their own.
(ii) The other approach starts from the experience of the student, experience that has
taken place as part of life or which has been organized as part of the programme.
It then depends upon the student identifying and accepting a need to learn. Such
as approach has been described as ‘problem solving’, ‘student-centered learning’,
‘participative learning’, and so on.
The problem with this approach is to ensure that important areas of learning are not
omitted and that the ‘right’ balance is struck between these areas, and that each area is
learned as effectively as possible.
Such a list of teaching approaches identifies a second problem associated with the
approach; that of (over) concentrating upon the activities – the practical work which
tends to be more enjoyable, and neglecting to recognize the possible learning that can
accrue from such activities.
Conclusion:
The paper gives insight into a few concepts of teaching and learning, especially at the
higher levels of education. Many countries make it mandatory for teachers to undergo
formal course on education principles where the concepts of teaching and learning are
taught. However, this exposure to teachers is non-existent for professional teachers who
enter into teaching profession without any exposure to formal training in education. This
sometimes may act as a constraint in the process of effective teaching and learning
process.
References:
1. T.V. Rao, Human Resource Development - Tata McGraw Hill Publication, 1998.
2. Ian Reece and Stephen Walker, Teaching, Training and Learning - Business
Education Publishers, 1997.
3. Dave R.H., Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives - Educational Innovators
Press, 1975.