Logframe WFP
Logframe WFP
Logframe WFP
Output
1.1 Immediate relief Encamped IDPs can meet 50% of own their Aim for follow-up assessment by
food requirements [date]
A 50% reference ration provided to 150,000 IDPs for
an initial 3 months (13,500 tons) through Ration will be adequate for the most food Meet with IPs and test feasibility of
implementing partners (IPs) insecure and vulnerable IDPs commencement by [date]
INGO implementing partners can mobilise Aim to conclude Letters of
to take over distributions by [date] Agreement with IPs by [date]
Activities (or steps)
1.1.1 Transportation Commercial contractors willing to take Contact potential contractors by
trucks to insecure districts [date]
Transport commodities to FDPs for distribution by IP
in accordance with monthly distribution targets based RubHalls can be erected at EDPs by end of Send logistics coordinator to
on agreed beneficiary numbers, ration levels, food week oversee erection of RubHalls
basket composition and distribution cycles
1.1.2 Final Distribution IP has adequately skilled staff to effect Hold half-day workshop with IPs
sound distribution and district counterparts on
Assist IPs to develop efficient, safe and equitable food
distribution techniques by [date]
distribution mechanisms That insecurity does not prevent delivery to
IDP camps Ensure entitlements communicated
and complaints procedure in place
Emergency Coordinator to agree
Annexure A
Notes:
The outputs and activities included in this sample Logframe are intended to reflect the fact that in an emergency WFP usually has to get food out
immediately based on an estimate of numbers and needs (i.e. start somewhere) and subsequently take steps to clarify numbers and needs. Thus
the output in the worked example would be revised after more information is gathered. Activities would change quite frequently as tasks are
completed and new ones are added. This represents a ‘rolling design’ approach with a quick turnaround. Each sub-office could run a workplan
off it by adding a week-to-week implementation schedule to the first column (i.e. a GANTT chart).
Annexure B
Notes: Indicators should not necessarily be fixed at the outset – there needs to be room to improve indicators. This can be achieved by leaving
room SOs and COs to report against agreed indicators and to add new indicators from time to time – it is up to the recipients of the reports (CO
or HQ) to judge if the new indicators are valid.
MONITORING MATRIX FOR AN EMERGENCY OPERATION (IDP EXAMPLE, FIRST WEEKS) OPTION # 2
Code Strategy (results hierarchy) Progress against quantitative Progress against qualitative Action taken/required
targets (expressed as a %) targets/compliance with
standards
Goal: To provide essential food
relief to the crisis-affected people
of (country or region)
1 Purpose: To maintain the
minimum acceptable nutritional
and dietary standards of encamped
IDPs
Output
1.1 Immediate relief
A 50% reference ration provided
to 150,000 IDPs for an initial 3
months (13,500 tons) through
implementing partners (IPs)
Activities (or steps)
1.1.1 Transportation
Transport commodities to FDPs
for distribution by IP etc.
1.1.2 Final Distribution
Annexure B
Etc
Annexure C