Uop Merox Process: G. A. Dziabis
Uop Merox Process: G. A. Dziabis
Uop Merox Process: G. A. Dziabis
CHAPTER 11.3
UOP MEROX PROCESS
G. A. Dziabis
UOP LLC
Des Plaines, Illinois
INTRODUCTION
The UOP* Merox* process is an efficient and economical catalytic process developed for
the chemical treatment of petroleum fractions to remove sulfur present as mercaptans
(Merox extraction) or to directly convert mercaptan sulfur to less-objectionable disulfides
(Merox sweetening). This process is used for liquid-phase treating of liquefied petroleum
gases (LPG), natural-gas liquids (NGL), naphthas, gasolines, kerosenes, jet fuels, and heat-
ing oils. It also can be used to sweeten natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas in con-
junction with conventional pretreatment and posttreatment processes.
Merox treatment can, in general, be used in the following ways:
to save on acid consumption in alkylation operations using these materials as feed- stocks
or to meet the low-sulfur requirements of sensitive catalysts used in various chemical
synthesis processes (extraction)
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The UOP Merox process accomplishes mercaptan extraction and mercaptan conversion at
normal refinery rundown temperatures and pressures. Depending on the application,
extraction and sweetening can be used either singly or in combination. The process is based
on the ability of an organometallic catalyst to promote the oxidation of mercap- tans to
disulfides in an alkaline environment by using air as the source of oxygen. For light
hydrocarbons, operating pressure is controlled slightly above the bubble point to ensure
liquid-phase operation; for heavier stocks, operating pressure is normally set to keep air
dissolved in the reaction section. Gases are usually treated at their prevailing system
pressures.
Merox Extraction
Merox Sweetening
In sweetening units, the mercaptans are converted directly to disulfides, which remain in
the product; the total sulfur content of the treated stock is not reduced.
Merox sweetening can be accomplished in four ways:
Fixed-bed processing with intermittent circulation of caustic solution (Fig. 11.3.2)
Minimum-alkali fixed-bed (Minalk*) processing, which uses small amounts of caus-
tic solution injected continuously (Fig. 11.3.3)
Caustic-Free Merox* treatment for gasoline (Fig. 11.3.4) and kerosene (Fig. 11.3.5)
Liquid-liquid sweetening (Fig. 11.3.6)
conventional fixed-bed sweetening but with less equipment and lower capital and operating
costs.
The UOP Merox Minalk process (Fig. 11.3.3) relies on a small, controlled, continuous
injection of an appropriately weak alkali solution rather than the gross, intermittent alkali
saturation of the catalyst bed as in conventional fixed-bed Merox sweetening. This small
injection of alkali provides the needed alkalinity so that mercaptans are oxidized to disul-
fides and do not enter into peroxidation reaction, which would result if the alkalinity were
insufficient.
Caustic-Free Merox. A different version of the Merox family is the Caustic-Free Merox
process for sweetening gasoline and kerosene (Figs. 11.3.4 and 11.3.5). This technology
development uses the same basic principles of sweetening in which the mercaptans are
catalytically converted to disulfides, which remain in the treated hydrocarbon product.
The Caustic-Free Merox catalyst system consists of preimpregnated fixed-bed cata-
lysts, Merox No. 21* catalyst for gasoline and Merox No. 31* catalyst for kerosene, and a
liquid activator, Merox CF.* This system provides an active, selective, and stable sweet-
ening environment in the reactor. The high activity allows the use of a weak base, ammo-
nia, to provide the needed reaction alkalinity. No caustic (NaOH) is required, and fresh-
caustic costs and the costs for handling and disposing of spent caustic are thus elim- inated.
The actual design of the Caustic-Free Merox unit depends on whether it is used on
gasoline or kerosene. The reactor section is similar to the previously mentioned fixed-bed
systems, conventional and Minalk, except for the substitution of a different catalyst, the
addition of facilities for continuous injection of the Merox CF activator, and replacement
of the caustic injection facilities with ammonia injection facilities, anhydrous or aqueous.
For kerosene or jet fuel production, the downstream water-wash system is modified to
improve efficiency and to ensure that no ammonia remains in the finished product. Other
posttreatment facilities for jet fuel production remain unchanged.
FIGURE 11.3.4
Caustic-Free Merox sweetening for gasoline.
active fixed-bed systems. Hydrocarbon feed, air, and aqueous caustic soda containing
dispersed Merox catalyst are simultaneously contacted in a mixing device, where
mercaptans are converted to disulfides. Mixer effluent is directed to a settler, from which
the treated hydrocarbon stream is sent to storage or further processing. Separated
caustic solution from the settler is recirculated to the mixer. A small amount of Merox
catalyst is added periodically to maintain the catalytic activity.
In general, liquid-liquid sweetening is applicable to virgin light, thermally cracked
gasolines and to components having endpoints up to about 120°C (248°F). The mercaptan
types associated with catalytically cracked naphthas are easier to oxidize than those con-
tained in light virgin or thermal naphthas, and therefore liquid-liquid sweetening has been
successfully applied to catalytically cracked gasolines having endpoints as high as 230°C
(446°F).
The various applications of the Merox process on different hydrocarbon streams are
summarized in Table 11.3.1.
UOP MEROX PROCESS
Relative to other treating processes, the Merox process has the following advantages.
Ease of Operation. Merox process units are extremely easy to operate; usually, the air-
injection rate is the only adjustment necessary to accommodate wide variations in feed rate
or mercaptan content. Labor requirements for operation are minimal.
Proven Reliability. The Merox process has been widely accepted by the petroleum
industry; many units of all kinds (extraction, liquid-liquid, and fixed-bed sweetening) have
been placed in operation. By early 2002, more than 1700 of these UOP Merox units had
been licensed.
UOP MEROX PROCESS
High-Efficiency Design. The Merox process ensures high catalyst activity by using a high-
surface-area fixed catalyst bed to provide intimate contact of feed, reactants, and catalyst
for complete mercaptan conversion. The technology does not rely on mechanical
mixing devices for the critical contact. State-of-the-art Merox technology has no
requirement for continuous, high-volume caustic circulation that increases chemical
consumption, utility costs, and entrainment concerns.
High-Activity Catalyst and Activators. Active and selective catalysts are important in
promoting the proper mercaptan reactions even when the most difficult feedstocks are
processed. For the extraction version of the process, UOP offers a high-activity, water-
soluble catalyst, Merox WS,* which accomplishes efficient caustic regeneration. As a
result, chemical and utility consumption is minimized, and mercaptans are completely
converted. For the sweetening version of the Merox process, UOP offers a series of
catalysts and promoters that provide the maximum flexibility for treating varying
feedstocks and allow refiners to select which catalyst system is best for their situation.
PROCESS CHEMISTRY
The Merox process in all its applications is based on the ability of an organometallic
catalyst to accelerate the oxidation of mercaptans to disulfides at or near ambient tem-
perature and pressure. Oxygen is supplied from the atmosphere. The reaction proceeds only
in an alkaline environment. The basic overall reaction can be written:
Merox catalyst
4RSH O2 2RSSR 2H2O (11.3.1)
Alkalinity
where R is a hydrocarbon chain that may be straight, branched, or cyclic and saturated or
unsaturated. Mercaptan oxidation, even though slow, reportedly occurs whenever
petroleum fractions containing mercaptans are exposed to atmospheric oxygen. In effect,
the Merox catalyst speeds up this reaction, directs the products to disulfides, and minimizes
undesirable side reactions.
In Merox extraction, in which mercaptans in the liquid or gaseous feedstocks are high-
ly soluble in the caustic soda solution as solvent, the mercaptan oxidation is done outside
Merox catalyst
4NaSR O2 2H2O 4NaOH 2RSSR (11.3.3)
Aqueous phase Aqueous phase Oil phase (insoluble)
According to these treating steps, the treated product has reduced sulfur content corre-
sponding to the amount of mercaptan extracted.
In the case of Merox sweetening, in which the types of mercaptans in the feedstocks are
difficult to extract, the sweetening process is performed in situ in the presence of Merox
catalyst and oxygen from the air in an alkaline environment. UOP studies have shown that
the mercaptan, or at least the thiol (—SH) functional group, first transfers to the aqueous
alkaline phase (Fig. 11.3.7) and there combines with the catalyst. The simul- taneous
presence of oxygen causes this mercaptan-catalyst complex to oxidize, yielding a disulfide
molecule and water. This reaction at the oil-aqueous interface is the basis for both liquid-
liquid and fixed-bed sweetening by the Merox process and can be written:
Merox catalyst
4RSH O2 2RSSR 2H2O (11.3.4)
Oil phase Alkalinity Oil phase
Merox catalyst
2RSR 2RSH O2 2RSSR 2H2O (11.3.5)
Oil phase Alkalinity Oil phase
Equation (11.3.5) represents the case in which two different mercaptans may enter into
this reaction. Petroleum fractions have a mixture of mercaptans so that the R chain may
have any number of carbon atoms consistent with the boiling range of the hydrocarbon
feed.
Because the process is catalytic, essentially catalyst and caustic soda are not consumed.
This fact is borne out by commercial experience, in which actual catalyst consumptions are
low. Consumption is due mainly to fouling by certain substances and loss through an
occasional purge of dirty or diluted caustic solution and a corresponding makeup of fresh
caustic to maintain effective caustic concentration.
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
The only product specification applicable to Merox treating is the mercaptan sulfur content
of the product because the Merox process per se has no effect on the other prop- erties of
the feedstock being treated. Generally, therefore, the Merox process is used to reduce the
mercaptan sulfur content, and thereby the total sulfur content, when the process is applied
to gases and light stocks in the extraction mode of operation. In the case of heavier
chargestocks that require the sweetening mode of operation, the only product specification
applied is the mercaptan sulfur content (or sometimes also the doctor test); the total sulfur
contents of the untreated feed and the treated product are the same.
Merox-treated products may be finished products sent directly to storage without any
further processing or intermediate products that may require either blending into finished
stocks or additional processing for making other products.
Table 11.3.2 lists typical quality specifications for treating applications of the Merox
process.
PROCESS ECONOMICS
Sample economics of the UOP Merox process in 2002 dollars on the basis of 10,000 barrels
per stream day (BPSD) capacity for various applications are given in Table
11.3.3. The capital costs are for modular design, fabrication, and erection of Merox plants.
The estimated modular cost is inside battery limits, U.S. Gulf coast, FOB point of
manufacturer. The estimated operating costs include catalysts, chemicals, utilities, and
labor.
The first Merox process unit was put on-stream October 20, 1958. In October 1993, the
1500th Merox process unit was commissioned. Design capacities of these Merox units
range from as small as 40 BPSD for special application to as large as 140,000 BPSD and
total more than 12 million BPSD.
The application of the operating Merox units is distributed approximately as follows:
25 percent LPG and gases
30 percent straight-run naphthas
30 percent FCC, thermal, and polymerization gasolines
15 percent kerosene, jet fuel, diesel, and heating oils
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Feed Type
H2S, wt ppm* <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1
Acid oil, wt % .... .... <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Products:
Mercaptan sulfur, wt ppm <5–10 <5–10 <5–10 <5–10 <10 <10 <30 <30
Mercaptan sulfur disulfide sulfur, wt ppm 10–20 <50
*After caustic prewash, if any, before Merox process. LPG = liquefied petroleum gas; NGL = natural gas liquid; gas = natural gas, refinery gas, or synthesis gas; LN = light naph-
thas; MN and HN = medium and heavy naphthas; FBR = full boiling range.
UOP MEROX PROCESS
Est. operating
Merox Est. capital, costs,
Product type million $ cents/bbl
LPG Extraction* 1.8 0.4
Gasoline Minalk 0.9 0.3
Caustic-free 0.9 2.5
Kerosene Conventional fixed-bed 2.1 2.5
Caustic-free 2.1 6.0
*Includes pretreating and posttreating facilities.
The Merox process has been thoroughly proved and well-established commercially. Its
popular acceptance by the petroleum industry is based on its simplicity, efficiency, low
capital and operation costs, and proven reliability. Many refiners have two or more Merox
units. Even though the process is approaching 45 years of use, its technology is by no
means stagnant, thanks to continuing research and development efforts to ensure an
excellent outlook for this remarkably successful process.