Chapter - 1: Experimental Analysis of Concrete Incorporating Waste Foundry Sand and Waste Ceramic Tiles
Chapter - 1: Experimental Analysis of Concrete Incorporating Waste Foundry Sand and Waste Ceramic Tiles
Chapter - 1: Experimental Analysis of Concrete Incorporating Waste Foundry Sand and Waste Ceramic Tiles
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
Foundry sand is a sand that when moistened and compressed or oiled or heated tends
to pack well and hold its shape. It is also known as moulding sand. It is used in the process of
sand casting for preparing the mould cavity. The foundry sand is high quality sand with
uniform physical characteristics. It is a by product of ferrous and non-ferrous metal casting
industries where sand has been used for centuries as a molding material because of its
thermal conductivity and its unique engineering properties. In modern foundry practice, sand
is typically recycled and reused through many production cycles. Industry estimates are that
approximately 100 million tons of sand is used in production annually. The main ingredients
for manufacturing of concrete are cement, course aggregates, fine aggregates, waste ceramic
tiles and waste foundry sand. Foundries successfully recycle and reuse the sand many times
in a foundry. When the sand can no longer be reused in the foundry, it is removed from the
foundry and is termed as waste foundry sand.
The sand is used in two different ways in metal casting: as a molding material, which
forms the external shape of the cast part, and as cores, which form internal void spaces in
products such as engine blocks. Since sand grains do not naturally adhere to each other, the
binders must be introduced to cause the sand to stick together and hold its shape during the
introduction of the molten metal into the mold and the cooling of the casting. Two general
types of binder systems are used in metal casting depending upon which the foundry sands
are classified as: clay bonded systems (Green sand) and chemically- bonded systems. Both
types of sands are suitable for beneficial use but they have different physical and
environmental characteristics.
1.1 Materials:
Cement
Fine aggregate
coarse aggregate
Water
Waste Foundry Sand
Waste Ceremic Tiles
1.1.1 Cement:
Portland cementis the most common type of cement in general use around the world, used
as a basic ingredient of concrete, mortar, stucco, and most non-speciality grout. It was
developed from other types of hydraulic lime in England in the mid-19th century and usually
originates from limestone. It is a fine powder produced by heating materials in a kiln to form
what is called clinker, grinding the clinker, and adding small amounts of other materials.
Several types of Portland cement are available with the most common being called ordinary
Portland cement (OPC) which is grey in colour, but a white Portland cement is also available
Portland cement is caustic, so it can cause chemical burns, the powder can cause irritation
or with severe exposure lung cancer, and can contain some hazardous components such as
crystalline silica and hexavalent chromium. Environmental concerns are the high energy
consumption required to mine, manufacture, and transport the cement and the related air
pollution including the release of greenhouse gases (e.g., carbon dioxide), dioxin, NOx, SO2,
and particulates.
The low cost and widespread availability of the limestone, shale, and other naturally
occurring materials used in Portland cement make it one of the lowest-cost materials widely
used over the last century throughout the world. Concrete produced from Portland cement is
one of the most versatile construction materials available in the world.
Aggregates are defined as inert, granular, and inorganic materials that normally
consist of stone or stone-like solids. Aggregates can be used alone (in road bases and various
types of fill) or can be used with cementing materials (such as Portland cement or asphalt
cement) to form composite materials or concrete. The most popular use of aggregates is to
form Portland cement concrete. Approximately three-fourths of the volume of Portland
cement concrete is occupied by aggregate. It is inevitable that a constituent occupying such a
large percentage of the mass should have an important effect on the properties of both the
fresh and hardened products. As another important application, aggregates are used in asphalt
cement concrete in which they occupy 90% or more of the total volume. Once again,
aggregates can largely influence the composite properties due to its large volume fraction.
Fine agrregate 4.75mm down locally available at Kalaburagi Karnataka.
Fine aggregate (sand): Aggregates passing (4.75 mm) sieve and predominately retained on
the (75 mm) sieve.
Coarse aggregate: Aggregates predominately retained on the (4.75 mm) sieve. For
mass concrete, the maximum size can be as large as 150 mm. coarse aggregate 20mm down
sized available locally at Kalaburagi Karnataka.
Natural aggregates: This kind of aggregate is taken from natural deposits without changing
their nature during the process of production such as crushing and grinding. Some examples
in this category are sand, crushed limestone, and gravel
1.1.4 Water:
Portable water from the Department of Civil Engineering, Appa Institute of Engineering
& Technology and was used both for the mixing of concrete as well as in curing of the cubes.
The M-sand was sun dried for 24 hours to remove moisture from it. The burnt sand was
collected and sieved through a IS sieve (75 microns). The resulting sand, which has the
required fineness, was collected for use. Using a mix design ratio of 1:1:3 and water binder
ratio of 0.45, a total of 45 concrete cubes of size 150mmx150mmx150mm were cast using
varying OPC-CSA ratio of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 100:100, respectively, i.e., 9 cubes per
% replacement. The cubes were cured and crushed after 3, 7, 28 days respectively and
strength results are presented.
Foundry sand is high quality silica sand with uniform physical characteristics. It is
produced from ferrous and nonferrous metal casting industries, where sand has been used for
centuries as a molding material because of its thermal conductivity. Indian foundries produce
approximately 1.71 million tons of waste foundry sand each year (Metal World, 2006). In the
casting process, heat and mechanical abrasion eventually render the sand and thus unsuitable
for use in casting molds, and a portion of the sand is continuously removed and replaced with
new one. This sand is treated as waste from casting industry and because of high silica
content it cannot be disposed easily. Waste foundry sand is made up of mostly natural sand
material. Its properties are similar to the properties of natural or manufactured sand, the
fineness modulus of waste foundry sand is 3.027. Thus it can normally be used as a
replacement of sand.
The considerable disposal expense has made the current practice of WFS disposal in
landfills less favorable. Besides the financial burden to the foundries, land-filling WFS also
make them liable for future environmental costs, remediation problems and regulation
restrictions. This issue is increasingly addressed by alternate options of reusing WFS
beneficially. Beneficial reuses of WFS in variety of applications related to infrastructure
engineering and rehabilitation works. Some of the researchers have reported the possible use
of waste foundry sand in different civil engineering applications. These alternate applications
offer cost savings for both foundries and user industries and environmental benefits at the
local and national level.
India ranks in the top 3 list of countries in terms of tiles production in the world. This
huge amount of ceramic tiles are not recycled but is often used as pavement material or
landfill. Ceramic tile aggregates are hard having considerable value of specific gravity, rough
surface on one side and smooth on other side, having less thickness and are lighter in weight
than normal stone aggregates. Using ceramic tile aggregate in concrete not only it will be cost
effective, but also provide considerable strength to the concrete. Construction industries
requires huge amount of ceramic tiles and other ceramic for architectural appearance, the
productions of which are drastically increased, due to this waste is also produce during
handling and usage of ceramic tiles. As 30 to 40% of the total production from manufacturing
units is solid waste. So, we selected these waste tiles as a replacement material to the basic
natural aggregate. Tiles are a mixture of clays that are pressed into shape and fired at high
temperatures which gives the hardness. Ceramic products are made from natural materials
which contain a high proportion of clay minerals.
CHAPTER-2
OBJECTIVE
CHAPTER – 3
LITERATURE REVIEW
Many authors have submitted the report for the use of foundry sand and waste
ceramic tiles in different civil engineering applications and different engineering structures
like dams, bridges, high rise buildings and other type of structures. Tarun R. Naik, Viral M.
Patel, 1994 conducted a project to evaluate performance and leaching of CLSM in which
both clean and used foundry sands were incorporated. The clean sand was obtained from a
sand mining company in Wisconsin and the used foundry sand was obtained from a steel
company in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. For purposes of comparison, properties of regular
concrete sand (meeting ASTM C 33 requirements for use in making concrete) were also
measured. Physical properties of these three foundry sands were determined using the
appropriate ASTM standard .However a modified ASTM C 88 was used to measure
soundness of foundry sands.
The properties of used foundry sand vary due to the type of foundry processing
equipments used, the type of additive for mold making, the number of times the sand is
reused, and the type and amount of binder used. Hanyoung also investigated two types of
foundry sands like silicate bonded sand as a fine aggregate and clay bonded sand also as a
fine aggregate for the concrete and also performed the test for the basic and important
properties of concrete like slump test, workability test, initial setting time of concrete, final
setting time of concrete with the use of waste foundry sand and then, compared the results of
tests with another concrete without mixed with waste foundry sand. Also measured the
compressive strength, tensile strength and split tensile strength of that concrete for 7 days and
28 days.
CHAPTER – 4
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
The materials used for concrete for this study were Portland cement, waste foundry
sand natural sand, aggregate and waste ceramic tiles, manufactured by Ultra Tech Cement
from Mulched was used. Aggregate of nominal size 20mm was used as coarse aggregate. The
sand used was source from sand suppliers. The average bulk density was 1550 kgm-3, with a
fineness modulus of 2.5. It was flushed with water to remove fines and dirt and sun dried
before use. The waste foundry sand obtain from stone crusher, Kalaburagi. Ordinary potable
tap water produced at campus was used in mixing the materials. It appeared clean and free
from any visible impurities conforming to the requirements of
A concrete mix of ratio of 1:1:2 by volume, with a water cement ratio of 0.46 was
used as control, which the properties of all other mixes were compared. Waste Foundry sand
& waste Ceramic tiles were used to replace 0%, 10%, 20%, 30, and 40% of the natural sand
and coarse aggregate by volume. Different mixes were batched and 15, specimens of each
mix were produced. Concrete was cast in pre-oiled cast iron moulds.
After casting, the moulds were covered with plastic sheets to prevent water loss
through evaporation. After 24 hours, the cubes were demoulded and immersed in a curing
tank to cure for strength gain. The curing process is beneficial to hydration of cement, while
improving the physical and mechanical properties of concrete. On each day of testing, the
specimens were removed from the tank and placed in the open air for about two hours.The
compressive strength of the concrete specimen was determined by crushing after
determination of density. The results for the density and compressive strengths are the
average of three tests.
CHAPTER – 5
PRIMARY INVESTIGATION TEST ON MATERIAL
SI NO PROPERTIES VALUE
01 Specific gravity 3.11
02 Standard consistency 33%
03 Initial setting time in min 30
04 Final setting time in min 480
TABLE 5.2
SI NO PROPERTIES VALUE
SI NO POPERTIES VALUES
01 Specific gravity 2.85
02 Fineness modulus 2.56
03 Water absorption 1.23
TABLE 5.4
SI NO POPERTIES VALUES
01 Specific gravity 2.59
02 Fineness modulus 2.6
03 Water absorption 1.1
Sieve Analysis:
The name given to the operation of dividing a sample of aggregate into various
fraction each consisting of particles of the same size. The sieve analysis is conducted to
determine the particle size distribution in a sample of aggregate, which we call gradation.
The aggregate used for making concrete are normally of the maximum size
80mm,40mm, 20mm, 10mm, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 600micron, 300micron, 150micron and
The apparatus used for conducting the slump test consists of slump cone.
The internal surface of the mould is thoroughly cleaned and free from
moisture and adherence of any old set concrete before commencing the test.
Concrete is placed in the mould and is removed for slump value.
The test is carried out using a mould known as a slump cone or Abram’s cone. The
coneis placed on a hard non-absorbent surface. This cone is filled with fresh concrete in three
stages. Each time, each layer is tamped 25 times with a rod of standard dimensions. At the
end of thethird stage, concrete is struck off flush to the top of the mould. The mould is
carefully liftedvertically upwards with twisting motion, so as not to disturb the concrete cone.
Concrete subsides. This subsidence is termed as slump, and is measured to the nearest 5 mm
if the slump is <100 mm and measured to the nearest 10 mm if the slump is >100 mm.
% W/C Degree of
Sl.No. Water Added Slump
Replacement ratio Workability
1 0 200 0.46 7 Low
2 10 200 0.46 42 Low
To calculate the compressive strength of concrete cubes the universal testing machine
(UTM) having capacity of 2000 kN tonne was used. Compressive strength test, mechanical
test measuring the maximum amount of compressive load a material can bear before
fracturing. The test piece, usually in the form of a cube, prism, or cylinder, is compressed
between the platens of a compression-testing machine by a gradually applied load.
Brittle materials such as rock, brick, cast iron, and concrete may exhibit great
compressive strengths; but ultimately they fracture. The crushing strength of concrete,
determined by breaking a cube, and often called the cube strength, reaches values of about 3
tons per square inch, that of granite 10 tonnes per square inch, and that of cast iron from 25 to
60 tons per square inch.
Some ductile metals, such as mild steel, have very great compressive strengths; but
the actual values are difficult to measure. When a load is applied to a ductile metal, it deforms
elastically up to a certain point, and then plastic deformation occurs. Increasing loads may
even completely flatten a test piece without any definite fracture occurring, so that no value
can be obtained for the compressive strength. The custom of quoting tensile-strength values
in these cases is inaccurate but safe, compressive strength being always greater.
Now we got the ultimate load. So we can now calculate the concrete compressive strength.
Compressive strength =
= (N/mm2)
Due to this compressive loading, an element lying along the vertical diameter of the cylinder
is subjected to a vertical compressive stress and a horizontal stress (Fig-4). The loading
condition produces a high compressive stress immediately below the loading points. But the
larger portion of cylinder, corresponding to its depth is subjected to uniform tensile stress
acting horizontally. It is estimated that the compressive stress is acting for about 1/6 depth
and the remaining 5/6 depth is subjected to tension due to Poisson’s effect.
Assuming concrete specimen behaves as an elastic body, a uniform lateral tensile stress of
ftacting along the vertical plane causes the failure of the specimen, which can be calculated
from the formula as,
Where
L = Length of cylinder
D = Diameter of cylinder
The above test result represents the "Splitting Tensile Strength" of concrete that varies
between 1/8 to 1/12 of the cube compressive strength.
The test could be performed in accordance with as per BS 1881: Part 118: 1983. A
simple plain concrete beam is loaded at one-third span points. Normal standard size of
specimen is 100x100x500 mm. If the largest nominal size of the aggregate does not exceed
25mm, size of 100x100x500 mm may also be used. Span of the beam is three times its depth.
Equal Loads are applied at the distance of one-third from both of the beam supports. It
induces equal reaction same as the loading at both of the supports. Loading on beam is
increased in such a manner that rate of increase in stress in the bottom fibre lies within the
From the above loading configuration it is clear that at the middle one-third portion,
in between two loadings, beam is subjected to pure bending. No shear force is induced within
this portion. It is this portion of beam where maximum pure bending moment of Pd/2 is
induced accompanied by zero shear force.
As loading increases, if fracture occurs within the middle one-third of the beam, the
maximum tensile stress reached called "modulus of rupture" fbtis computed from the
standard flexure formula.
Where
P = Compressive load at failure
L = Beam span between supports
d = Depth of beam
b = Width of beam
CHAPTER-6
= 30 + 1.65 x 4
= 38.26 N/mm2
From table 2, minimum water content = 186 litres (25 to 50mm slump) Estimated water
content for 100mm slump
= 186+
= 197 Ltrs
[HENCEOK]
b) Volume of cement =
= 0.141
c) Volume of water =
= 0.197
= [1-(0.141 + 0.197)]
= 0.662
= 1132.02
= 691.12 kg
Ratio = 1:1.58:2.58
Modified Mix Proportion for Replacement of Fine Aggregate by WFS and Coarse
Aggregate by WCT”
Coding % replacement
Concrete mix design
CHAPTER – 7
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Table 7.1: Compressive strength test
7 18.77
0%
28 31.5
7 19.43
10% 28 33.06
7 20.24
20%
28 36.1
7 18.22
30% 28 32.08
7 16.26
40% 28 29.13
Compressive strength v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 7 days
Compressive strength v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 28 days
Average strength
% age of Curing age
Replacement days (N/ )
7 2.02
0
28 3.12
7 2.12
10
28 3.32
7 2.11
20%
28 3.56
7 2.08
30
28 3.26
7 1.75
40%
28 3.05
Split tensile v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 7 days
Split tensile v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 28 days
Average strength
Curing age
% Replacement
days (N/ )
7 1.47
0%
28 1.58
7 1.47
10%
28 1.58
7 1.65
20%
28 2.5
7 1.51
30%
28 2.26
7 1.46
40%
28 2.04
Flexural strength v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 7 days
Flexural strength v/s percentage of waste foundry sand replacement for 28 days
CHAPTER – 8
CONCLUSION
Depending upon above results and methodology adopted following conclusion were
made regarding properties of concrete incorporating waste foundry sand and waste ceramic
tile.
It is found that compressive strength of concrete mix is increases with increase in
percentage of waste foundry sand and waste ceramic tiles as compare to regular
concrete. It was maximum for 20 % replacement after that it reduces.
It is also found that split tensile strength increases with increase in percentage of
waste foundry sand and waste ceramic tiles up to 20 % replacement after that it
reduces.
Workability of concrete mix increases with increase in percentage of waste foundry
sand and waste ceramic tiles as compare to regular concrete.
As waste foundry sand is waste from metal industries and waste ceramic tiles is waste
from construction industries therefore both waste can be effectively use in concrete
mix hence an eco-friendly construction material.
By using this waste in concrete, problems regarding to safely disposal is reduced.
CHAPTER – 9
SCOPE IN FUTURE
Principal objectives and scope the main aims of this report are to present state-of-the-art
knowledge regarding production and utilisation of quarry dust. The overall objective is to
develop a technology platform for the shift from natural to manufactured aggregates based on
hard rock. This includes knowledge of resource management, cost effective production, use
of manufactured aggregates in concrete and mix design concepts for concrete.
PHOTO GALLERY
REFERENCES
[1] Daniela Sani and Francesca Tittarelli, “Used Foundry Sand in Cement Mortars and
Concrete Production” Open Waste Management Journal, 2010, 3, 18-25
[2] Rafat Siddique, Yogesh Aggarwal, Paratibha Aggarwal, El-Hadj Kadri, Rachid
Bennacer, “Strength, durability, and micro-structural properties of concrete made with
Used-foundry sand (UFS)”, Construction and Building Materials 25 (2011) 1916–
1925
[3] El-Hadj Kadri, Rafat Siddique, “Effect of metakaolin and foundry sand on the near
surface characteristics of concrete”, Construction and Building Materials 25 (2011)
3257–3266
[4] Rafat Siddiquea, Gurpreet Singh, “Utilization of waste foundry sand (WFS) in
concrete manufacturing”, Resources Conservation and Recycling 55 (2011) 885– 892.
[5] Gurpreet Singh, Rafat Siddiqu, “Effect of waste foundry sand (WFS) as partial
replacement of sand on the strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity and permeability of
concrete”, Construction and Building Materials 26 (2012) 416–422
[6] H. Merve Basar, Nuran Deveci Aksoy, “The effect of waste foundry sand (WFS) as
partial replacement of sand on the mechanical, leaching and micro-structural
characteristics of ready-mixed concrete”, Construction and Building Materials 35
(2012) 508–515
[7] Gurpreet Singh, Rafat Siddique, “Abrasion resistance and strength properties of
concrete containing waste foundry sand (WFS)”, Construction and Building Materials
28 (2012) 421–426
[8] Gurdeep Kaur, Rafat Siddique, Anita Rajor, “Properties of concrete containing fungal
treated waste foundry sand”, Construction and Building Materials 29 (2012) 82–87
[9] Pathariya Saraswati C, Rana Jaykrushna K, Shah Palas A, Mehta Jay G, Patel Ankit
N, “Application of Waste Foundry Sand for Evolution of Low-Cost Concrete”,
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
(IJETT) – Volume 4 Issue 10 - Oct 2013
[10] Yogesh Aggarwal a,⇑, Rafat Siddique, “Microstructure and properties of concrete
using bottom ash and waste foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregates”,
Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 210–223