Perhitungan Beban Lalu-Lintas: Paket Ii/Iii: Cikampek - Pamanukan

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

PERHITUNGAN BEBAN LALU-LINTAS

PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN

I. DASAR- DASAR PERHITUNGAN

1 Faktor Perusak Kendaraan /Vehicle Damage Factor ( VDF )

a. Sumbu Tunggal / Single Axle VDF = ( P/8165 )4


b. Sumbu Ganda / Tandem Axles VDF = 0.086 x ( P/8165 )4
c. Sumbu Triple / Tripple Axles VDF = 0.035 x ( P/8165 )4

Total Berat Beban Sumbu VDF


NO. TIPE KENDARAAN Kendaraan Sb. Depan Sb. Blkg Sumbu Sumbu Total VDF Keterangan
(kg) (kg) (kg) Depan Belakang

1 Sepeda Motor - - - - - -
2 Mobil Sedan 2,000 1,000 1,000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004
3 Angkot - 2 ton 2,000 1,000 1,000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 10,500 3,570 6,930 0.0365 0.5189 0.5555
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 8,000 2,720 5,280 0.0123 0.1749 0.1872
21,320 7,249 14,071 0.6212 8.8206 9.4418 Pakai MST 14 ton
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
13,000 4,420 8,580 0.0859 1.2193 1.3052 Pakai MST 10 ton
37,800 9,450 28,350 1.7943 12.4993 14.2936 Pakai MST 14 ton
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
27,000 6,750 20,250 0.4671 3.2537 3.7208 Pakai MST 10 ton

2 Tahun Survey Lalu-lintas 2002 Survey Pantura


3 Tahun Pertama Dibuka Lalu-lintas 2003
4 Pertumbuhan Lalu-lintas Pertahun( g ) 4.0% Tahun 2002
4.0% 2003 s/d 2013

5 Umur Rencana 10 tahun


6 Jumlah lajur Jalan Lama 4 lajur
7 Jumlah Arah Jalan Lama 2 arah
8 Jumlah Lajur Rencana 4 lajur
9 Jumlah Jalur/ Arah Rencana 2 jalur/arah

II. PERHITUNGAN LALU-LINTAS HARIAN ( LHR Tahunan / AADT ) RENCANA

Pertum
TIPE LHR LHR LHR LHR
NO. buhan Growth Growth
KENDARAAN
2002 (g) 2003 2008 2013

1 Sepeda Motor 3,945 4% 4,103 4% 4,992 4% 6,073


2 Mobil Sedan 3,702 4% 3,850 4% 4,684 4% 5,699
3 Angkot - 2 ton 1,937 4% 2,014 4% 2,451 4% 2,982
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 3,033 4% 3,154 4% 3,838 4% 4,669
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 688 4% 716 4% 871 4% 1,059
0 4% 0 4% 0 4% 0
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
4,484 4% 4,663 4% 5,674 4% 6,903
0 4% 0 4% 0 4% 0
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
3,710 4% 3,858 4% 4,694 4% 5,711
Total 21,499 22,359 27,203 33,097
** Truk sedang dan besar dengan MST 10 ton
LHR pada Rencana tahun Pertama : 2003 = (1+0.04)1 x 21,499 =
LHR pada Pertengahan Umur Rencana : 2008 = (1+0.04)5 x 22,359 =
LHR pada Ahir Umur Rencana 2013 = (1+0.04)10 x 27,203 =

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


III. PERHITUNGAN BEBAN SUMBU STANDARD ( ESA )

Faktor Faktor ESA Harian Rata-


TIPE LHR TOTAL LHR per LAJUR
NO. Distribusi Perusak rata
KENDARAAN Kendaraan
2003 2013 2003 2013 (VDF) 2003

1 Sepeda Motor 4,103 6,073 0.30 1231 1,822 - -


2 Mobil Sedan 3,850 5,699 0.30 1155 1,710 0.0004 0.5
3 Angkot - 2 ton 2,014 2,982 0.30 604 895 0.0004 0.3
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 3,154 4,669 0.45 1419 2,101 0.5555 788.5
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 716 1,059 0.45 322 477 0.1872 60.3
0 0 0.45 0 0 9.4418 0.0
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
4,663 6,903 0.45 2099 3,106 1.3052 2739.0
0 0 0.45 0 0 14.2936 0.0
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
3,858 5,711 0.45 1736 2,570 3.7208 6460.3
Total 22,359 33,097 8,566 12,680 10,049

ESA Harian pada Tahun Pertama ( ESALo ) per-lajur 2003 = 10,049

ESA Harian pada Akhir Tahun Rencana per-lajur ( ESAL) 2013 = 14,875

IV. PERHITUNGAN KUMULATIF BEBAN SUMBU STANDARD ( ESAL)


Rumus A:

Akhir Tahun ( 1+ g)n ESA Tahunan ESA Kumulatif

a b c d = 365 x 10,049 x( b1+b2)/2 ei = d(i-1)+ei


0 2003 1.000
1 2004 1.040 3,741,169 3,741,169
2 2005 1.082 3,890,815 7,631,984
3 2006 1.125 4,046,448 11,678,432
4 2007 1.170 4,208,306 15,886,737
5 2008 1.217 4,376,638 20,263,375
6 2009 1.265 4,551,704 24,815,079
7 2010 1.316 4,733,772 29,548,851
8 2011 1.369 4,923,123 34,471,973
9 2012 1.423 5,120,047 39,592,021
10 2013 1.480 5,324,849 44,916,870

ESA Kumulatifpada Akhir Umur Rencana 2013 = 44,916,870

Rumus B : n EALo(365)
ESA Kumulatif = S ----------- x [{(1+g)^n} - 1]=
o ln ( 1 + g )

for n = 10
g = 4.0%

365 x 10,049
ESA Kumulatif = -------------------- x 0.4802
0.039

ESA Kumulatif = 44,911,113 ESA

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


S

Keterangan

Pakai MST 14 ton


Pakai MST 10 ton
Pakai MST 14 ton
Pakai MST 10 ton

Keterang-
an

MST 14 t
MST 10 t
MST 14 t
MST 10 t

22,359
27,203
33,097

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


ESA Harian Rata-
rata
2013

-
0.8
0.4
1167.1
89.2
0.0
4054.4
0.0
9562.8
14,875

ESA

ESA

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


PERHITUNGAN BEBAN LALU-LINTAS
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN
TGL/BLN/THN : 17-Sep-02

I. DASAR- DASAR PERHITUNGAN

1 Faktor Perusak Kendaraan /Vehicle Damage Factor ( VDF )

a. Sumbu Tunggal / Single Axle VDF = ( P/8165 )4


b. Sumbu Ganda / Tandem Axles VDF = 0.086 x ( P/8165 )4
c. Sumbu Triple / Tripple Axles VDF = 0.035 x ( P/8165 )4

Total Berat Beban Sumbu VDF


NO. TIPE KENDARAAN Kendaraan Sb. Depan Sb. Blkg Sumbu Sumbu Total VDF Keterangan
(kg) (kg) (kg) Depan Belakang

1 Sepeda Motor - - - - - -
2 Mobil Sedan 2,000 1,000 1,000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004
3 Angkot - 2 ton 2,000 1,000 1,000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 10,500 3,570 6,930 0.0365 0.5189 0.5555
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 8,000 2,720 5,280 0.0123 0.1749 0.1872
21,320 7,249 14,071 0.6212 8.8206 9.4418 26% Dengan MST 14 t
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
14,950 5,083 9,867 0.1502 2.1326 2.2828 74 % MST 10 t
37,800 9,450 28,350 1.7943 12.4993 14.2936 26% Dengan MST 14 t
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
27,000 6,750 20,250 0.4671 3.2537 3.7208 74% MST 10 t

2 Tahun Survey Lalu-lintas 2002 Team Survey Pantura


3 Tahun Pertama Dibuka Lalu-lintas 2003
4 Pertumbuhan Lalu-lintas Pertahun( g ) 4.0% Tahun 2002
4.0% 2003 s/d 2013

5 Umur Rencana 10 tahun


6 Jumlah lajur Jalan Lama 4 lajur
7 Jumlah Arah Jalan Lama 2 arah
8 Jumlah Lajur Rencana 4 lajur
9 Jumlah Jalur/ Arah Rencana 2 jalur/arah

II. PERHITUNGAN LALU-LINTAS HARIAN ( LHR Tahunan / AADT ) RENCANA

Pertum
TIPE LHR LHR LHR LHR
NO. buhan Growth Growth
KENDARAAN
2002 (g) 2003 2008 2013

1 Sepeda Motor 3,945 4% 4,103 4% 4,992 4% 6,073


2 Mobil Sedan 3,702 4% 3,850 4% 4,684 4% 5,699
3 Angkot - 2 ton 1,937 4% 2,014 4% 2,451 4% 2,982
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 3,033 4% 3,154 4% 3,838 4% 4,669
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 688 4% 716 4% 871 4% 1,059
1,345 4% 1,399 4% 1,702 4% 2,071
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
3,139 4% 3,264 4% 3,972 4% 4,832
1,113 4% 1,158 4% 1,408 4% 1,713
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
2,597 4% 2,701 4% 3,286 4% 3,998
Total 21,499 22,359 27,203 33,097
** Asumsi 30% dari jumlah Kendaraan Sedang dan Berat Mempunyai Beban MST 14 ton
LHR pada Rencana tahun Pertama : 2003 = (1+0.04)1 x 21,499 =
LHR pada Pertengahan Umur Rencana : 2008 = (1+0.04)5 x 22,359 =
LHR pada Akhir Umur Rencana 2013 = (1+0.04)10 x 27,203 =

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


III. PERHITUNGAN BEBAN SUMBU STANDARD ( ESA )

Faktor Faktor ESA Harian Rata-


TIPE LHR TOTAL LHR per LAJUR
NO. Distribusi Perusak rata
KENDARAAN Kendaraan
2003 2013 2003 2013 (VDF) 2003

1 Sepeda Motor 4,103 6,073 0.30 1231 1,822 - -


2 Mobil Sedan 3,850 5,699 0.30 1155 1,710 0.0004 0.5
3 Angkot - 2 ton 2,014 2,982 0.30 604 895 0.0004 0.3
4 Bus- 10.5 ton 3,154 4,669 0.45 1419 2,101 0.5555 788.5
5 Truk Ringan 1 - 2 716 1,059 0.45 322 477 0.1872 60.3
1,399 2,071 0.45 630 932 9.4418 5944.1
6 Truk Sedang 1 - 2
3,264 4,832 0.45 1469 2,174 2.2828 3353.4
1,158 1,713 0.45 521 771 14.2936 7445.3
7 Truk Berat 1 - 22
2,701 3,998 0.45 1215 1,799 3.7208 4522.2
Total 22,359 33,097 8,566 12,680 22,115

ESA Harian pada Tahun Pertama ( ESALo ) per-lajur 2003 = 22,115

ESA Harian pada Akhir Tahun Rencana per-lajur ( ESAL) 2013 = 32,735

IV. PERHITUNGAN KUMULATIF BEBAN SUMBU STANDARD ( ESAL)


Rumus A:

Akhir Tahun ( 1+ g)n ESA Tahunan ESA Kumulatif

a b c d = 365 x 22,115 x( b1+b2)/2 ei = d(i-1)+ei


0 2003 1.000
1 2004 1.040 8,233,253 8,233,253
2 2005 1.082 8,562,583 16,795,837
3 2006 1.125 8,905,087 25,700,924
4 2007 1.170 9,261,290 34,962,214
5 2008 1.217 9,631,742 44,593,956
6 2009 1.265 10,017,012 54,610,967
7 2010 1.316 10,417,692 65,028,659
8 2011 1.369 10,834,400 75,863,059
9 2012 1.423 11,267,776 87,130,835
10 2013 1.480 11,718,487 98,849,322

ESA Kumulatifpada Akhir Umur Rencana 2013 = 98,849,322

Rumus B : n EALo(365)
ESA Kumulatif = S ----------- x [{(1+g)^n} - 1]=
o ln ( 1 + g )

for n = 10
g = 4.0%

365 x 22,115
ESA Kumulatif = -------------------- x 0.4802
0.039

ESA Kumulatif = 98,836,652 ESA

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


S

Keterangan

26% Dengan MST 14 t


74 % MST 10 t
26% Dengan MST 14 t
74% MST 10 t

Keterang-
an

MST 14 t
MST 10 t
MST 14 t
MST 10 t

22,359
27,203
33,097

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


ESA Harian Rata-
rata
2013

-
0.8
0.4
1167.1
89.2
8798.8
4963.8
11020.9
6693.9
32,735

ESA

ESA

06/12/2019 Page 23 ap-01.xls


PERHITUNGAN TEBAL PERKERASAN KAKU
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN
TGL/BLN/THN : 17-Sep-02

A. KRITERIA DISAIN

Jumlah Lajur 4 lajur


Jumlah Arah/Jalur 2 arah
Umur Rencana 20 tahun Persyaratan Minimum Standard Bina Marga
Tahun survey 2002
Tahun Pertama dibuka Lalu-lintas 2003
Jenis Perkerasan Beton Bersambung Tanpa Tulangan

B. Buku Rujukan " Petunjuk Perencanaan Perkerasan Kaku ( Beton Semen ) " Puslitbang PU

C. Data-data :

CBR Tanah Dasar 2 %


Modulus Reaksi Tanah Dasar ( lihat Gb. 2. Hal.12 ) k = < 2 kg/cm2
Lapis Pondasi Bawah Wet Lean Concrete = ( K-125 ) tebal = 10 cm
Modulus Elastisitas ( E1 ) K-125 = 57000*(fc*14.22)0.5 2,403,143 psi
168,997 kg/cm2
Untuk Mencari Modulus Gabungan Reaksi Tanah Dasar dengan K-125 (kgab.) lihat Gb.3, hal.13
Gunakan E1 = 1.000.000 psi
kgab. - dengan K-125 10 cm : k gab. = 6 kg/cm3
Kuat Tekan Lentur Beton Kelas K-350 ---> 28 hari = MR (fs) = 41 kg/cm2
Kuat tekan pada 28 hari = fc = s 'bk28 = 350 kg/cm2
Kuat Tarik Baja U39, = 3390 kg/cm2
Pertumbuhan Lalu-lintas per-tahun = g 4%
Faktor Fungsi Jalan : Jalan Arteri FK = 1.1
Data Lalu-lintas didapat dari Survey Pantura tahun 2002

Pertumbuhan
Berat Total LHR LHR LHR Jumlah Sumbu Total
per-tahun
No TIPE KENDARAAN Kendaraan per-Kendaraan Sumbu
2002 2002 (g) 2003
( ton ) buah buah (%) each buah buah
1 Mobil 2 3,702 3,702 4% 3,850 - #VALUE!
2 Util 1+ Util 2 (3 + 5) 8 2,625 2,625 4% 2,730 2 5,460
3 Bus ( 4 + 7 ) 15 3,033 3,033 4% 3,154 2 6,309
4 Truk 2 - axle ( 7 +14 )* 21 4,484 4,484 4% 4,663 2 9,327
5 Truk 3 a >3 sb. ( 8+14.5+14.5)* 38 3,710 3,710 4% 3,858 3 11,575
TOTAL 17,554 17,554 18,256
Jumlah Kendaraan Niaga Harian (JKNH) : 13,852 14,406
Jumlah Sumbu : #VALUE!

Catatan : Sesuai dengan kebijakan BM, untuk Proyek Heavy Loaded, Muatan Sumbu Tunggal ( MST) untuk truk 14 ton.

C. Perhitungan

Jumlah Kendaraan Niaga Harian selama umur Rencana 20 tahun

JKN = 365 x JKNH x R


JKNH = 14,406 buah
R= {{( 1+g)^20} - 1]/ eLog ( 1+g) = 30.37 buah

So, JKN = 365 x JKNH x R = 365 x 14,406 x 30.37 = 159,690,788 buah

Jumlah Sumbu Kendaraan Niaga selama Umur Rencana 20 tahun :


JKN20 = 365 x Sum of axle x R = 365 x #VALUE! x 30.37 = #VALUE! buah

Prosentase Konfigurasi masing-masing Sumbu dan Beban Sumbu

Beban Sumbu
NO. Konfigurasi Sumbu Persentase Konfigurasi Sumbu
( ton )
Jumlah Kendaraan : Tot. Sumbu (%)=P
1 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 3 2,730 : #VALUE!
2 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 4 3,154 : #VALUE!
3 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 5 2,730 : #VALUE!
4 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 7 4,663 : #VALUE!
5 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 7 3,154 : #VALUE! #VALUE!
6 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 8 3,858 : #VALUE!
7 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14 4,663 : #VALUE!
8 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14.5 3,858 : #VALUE!
9 SGRG (Sb.Tandem Roda Ganda) 29 3,858 : #VALUE!
Total #VALUE!

^ 9 06/12/2019
Cumulative of Load Repetition at design lane for along design life.

Beban Sumbu Kumulative of Repetisi Masing-masing Sb.


NO. Konfigurasi Sumbu
( ton ) = 0.45 x P x JKN20
( x 106)
1 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 3 #VALUE! #VALUE!
2 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 4 #VALUE! #VALUE!
3 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 5 #VALUE! #VALUE!
4 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 7 #VALUE! #VALUE!
5 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 7 #VALUE! #VALUE!
6 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 8 #VALUE! #VALUE!
7 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14 #VALUE! #VALUE!
8 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14.5 #VALUE! #VALUE!
9 SGRG (Sb.Tandem Roda Ganda) 14.5 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Coba Tebal Beton (cm ) = 20 cm MR = 41 kg/cm2

Tegangan Yang Kumulative Persenta-


Beban Sb. terjadi
Beban Sumbu Repetisi Beban Perbandingan Repetisi Beban se
No. Konfigurasi Sumbu Rencana yang Diizinkan
(Lihat Gb. 4-6.) Tegangan Kelelah-
(ton) Fk= 1.1 ( 106) (kg/cm2) (Lih Tabel 4.) an
a b c d e = d/MR f g=c/f
1 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 3 3.3 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
2 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 4 4.4 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
3 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 5 5.5 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
4 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 7 7.7 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
5 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 7 7.7 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
6 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 8 8.8 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
tak terhingga #VALUE!
7 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14 15.4 #VALUE! 19.5 0.48
#VALUE!
lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
8 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14.5 16.0 #VALUE! 26.5 0.65
8,000 #VALUE!
lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
9 SGRG (Sb.Tandem Roda Ganda) 14.5 16.0 #VALUE! 25.7 0.63
14,000 #VALUE!

Total = #VALUE!

Total kelelahan = #VALUE! #VALUE! 100 #VALUE!

Dicoba T (cm ) = 25 MR = 41 kg/cm2

Tegangan Yang Kumulative Persenta-


Beban Sb. terjadi
Beban Sumbu Repetisi Beban Perbandingan Repetisi Beban se
No. Konfigurasi Sumbu Rencana yang Diizinkan
(Lihat Gb. 4-6.) Tegangan Kelelah-
(ton) Fk= 1.1 ( 106) (kg/cm2) (Lih Tabel 4.) an
a b c d e = d/MR f g=c/f
1 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 3 3.3 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
2 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 4 4.4 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
3 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 5 5.5 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
4 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 7 7.7 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
5 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 7 7.7 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
6 STRT (Sb.Tunggal Roda Tunggal) 8 8.8 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!
7 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14 15.4 #VALUE! 19.5 0.48 tak terhingga #VALUE!
8 STRG (Sb.Tunggal Roda Ganda) 14.5 15.95 #VALUE! 20.0 0.49 tak terhingga #VALUE!
9 SGRG (Sb.Tandem Roda Ganda) 14.5 15.95 #VALUE! - - lihat Tabel4 #VALUE!

Total = #VALUE!

Total fatigue yang terjadi = #VALUE! #VALUE! 100 #VALUE!


Tebal plat kurang 25 cm
Untuk kemudahan pelaksanaan diambil tebal plat = 30 cm

Notasi :
JKN : Jumlah Kendaraan Niaga ( Number of the goods vehicle )
JKNH : Jumlah Kendaraan Niaga Harian ( Daily traffic of the goods vehicle )
STRT : Sumbu Tunggal Roda Tunggal ( Single Alxe, Single Tyre)
STRG : Sumbu Tunggal Roda Ganda ( Single Axle, Dual Tyres )
SGRG : Sumbu Ganda Roda Ganda ( Tandem Axle, Dual Tyres )
AADT : LHR Tahuna / Annual Average Daily Traffic
R : Pertumguhan Per-tahun / Growt rate for along design life ( year )
MR : Modulus of Rupture ( Kuat Tarik Lentur )
CTSB : Cement Treated Sub-Base

^ 10 06/12/2019
424011658.xls

RINGKASAN HASIL PERHITUNGAN


TEBAL PERKERASAN KAKU
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN

I. PERKERASAN KAKU DENGAN BETON BERSAMBUNG TANPA TULANGAN

1. KARAKTERISTIK BETON PADA USIA 28 HARI


Minimum Kuat Tarik Lentur (MR) = 40 kg/cm2
Minimum Kuat Tekan (fc) = 350 kg/cm2
Beton Kelas K- 350

2. Dimesi Plat Beton :


Tebal 30 cm
Lebar 3.50 m
Panjang per blok 5.00 m

3. Sambungan melintang per- 5m ( srinkage joint ) dengan Dowel


diameter 25 mm
panjang 700 mm
jarak ( space ) 300 mm
kelas Baja U39 plain

4. Tulanganpada sambungan memanjang ( Tie Bar )


diameter 16 mm
panjang 800 mm
jarak ( space ) 600 mm
kelas Baja U39 deformed

5 Besi Tiang dudukan ( chair bar )


diameter 12 mm
panjang - mm
jarak ( space ) 300/600 mm
kelas Baja U24 plain

6 Besi Mesh bars


diameter 12 mm
panjang - mm
jarak ( space ) 300/600 mm
kelas Baja U24 plain

7 Cross bars
diameter 12 mm
panjang - mm
jarak ( space ) 300/600 mm
kelas Baja U24 plain

II. Lapis Pondasi bawah :

- CTSB ( Cement Treated Sub-Base )


Tebal 10 cm
Kuat Tekan pada umur 28 hari 100 kg/cm2
Beton Kelas K-100

III. Tanah Dasar harus diperbaiki dengan :

1 Urugan Pilihan
CBR Minimum 10 %
Tebal 50 cm
2 Urugan Biasa jika CBR Tanah Dasar < 6%
CBR Minimum 6 %
Tebal varies cm

Page 3
DESIGN THICKNESS OF RIGID PAVEMENT
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN
9/17/2002

NO DATA ITEM SYMBOL VALUE UNIT Remarks

Input Data :
1 Design Life Years 20 years
2 Design lanes ; number of lanes 4 lanes
3 number of direction 2 ways
4 Annual Daily ESA in the first open traffic ( EAL o) ( EALo) 22,115 axles in year 2003
5 Annual Growth rate g 4%
n EALo(365)
6 Predicted number of 18-kip esal application W18 245,139,041 axles S ----------- x [{(1+g)^n} - 1]=
o ln ( 1 + g )
Maximum of Single Axle Load is 10 tons
7 Log10( w18 ) 8.389
8 Reliability R 85 %
9 Standard normal deviate Zr -1.037
10 Combine Standard Error So 0.25 See 2.1.3(3), page II-9, ( 0.25 for Rigid Pavement )
11 Innitial Serviceability index Po 4.5
12 Terminal Serviceability index Pt 2.5
13 D PSI Pt - Po 2
14 Concrete Class K 350 kg/cm2 MR = 1680.7598x(CBR^0.747564)
15 PPC compressive strength ( in psi) fc' 4,977 psi fc' = 350 x14.22 psi ( Concrete class K350 )
16 Modulus of Elasticity ( psi ) for Portland Cement Ec 4,021,228 psi Ec = 57.000x(fc')^0.5
17 Modulus of Rupture (psi) Sc' 663 psi Sc'= 43.5(Ec/10^6)+488.5
18 Load transfer coefficient J 3.2 For jointed concrete pavement
with dowels and without tied concrete shoulders is 3.2
19 Drainage coefficient Cd 0.9 for poor drainage

20 CBR Sub grade :


CBR 2.00 %
21 Resilient (Elastic ) modulus (psi) MR1 3,000 psi MR = 1500 x CBR or
22 Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (pci ) k1 155 pci k = MR/19.4
23 Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (pci )
24 Roadbed ( Cement Treated Sub-base ) DSB 4 in
25 Modulus of Subgrade reaction (pci ) k2 20 pci Corrected for Potential Loss of Support ( LS = 3.0)
Fine Grained or Natural Subgrade Materials
( E= 3,000 - 40,000 psi).see Table2.7 and Figure 3.6
Output Data :
26 Thickness of Concrete Slab ( D ) inches cm CBR (%) of Subgrade

D= 11.81 30.0 2.00


Log10( w18 ) 7.525
Need Log 10( w18 ) 8.389
Thickness is not enough

Notes : Formula :
Log10(W18) = Zr x So + 7.35 x log10(D+1) - 0.06
+ [{log10(delta PSI/(4.5 - 1.5))}/{1+ (1.624 x 10^7)/(D + 1)^8.46}]
+ (4.22 - 0.32 x Pt ) x log10[{Sc' x Cd x (D^0.75 - 1.132)}/{215.63 x J x (D^0.75 - (18.42/(Ec/k)^0.25)}]

PCI KG/CM3 PSI KG/CM2 Ec = 57.000(fc^0.5) psi


36.13 1 14.22 1
216.76 6 4,978 350 4,021,702
1,422 100 2,149,690

^ Page 4
ENT
AN

Remarks

----------- x [{(1+g)^n} - 1]=

aximum of Single Axle Load is 10 tons

e 2.1.3(3), page II-9, ( 0.25 for Rigid Pavement )

1680.7598x(CBR^0.747564)
x14.22 psi ( Concrete class K350 )

43.5(Ec/10^6)+488.5

th dowels and without tied concrete shoulders is 3.2

rrected for Potential Loss of Support ( LS = 3.0)


ne Grained or Natural Subgrade Materials
= 3,000 - 40,000 psi).see Table2.7 and Figure 3.6

^ Page 4
TEBAL PERKERASAN DENGAN CARA ROAD NOTE - 31
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN
9/17/2002

I. BASIC FORMULA for DESIGN THICKNESS OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT

1 Design Thickness of Asphalt Concrete Surface Course / TAC( cm )

TAC = 2.174015 x {Log(ESA)}2+2.444561 x Log(ESA) + 6.776027

2 Design Thickness of Granular Road - Base / TRB( cm ) = Aggregate Base Class "A"

TRB = 1.225491 x {Log(ESA)}2 + 5.082842 x Log(ESA) + 14.84231

3 Design Thickness of Granular Sub - Base / TSB( cm ) = Aggregate Base Class "B"

TSB = { -1.46581 x Log(CBRsg) + 1.35752 } x {Log(ESA)}2 +

+ { -6.40857 x Log(CBRsg) + 8.661746 } x Log(ESA) - {57.47031 xLog(CBRsg)} + 61.35236

4 Design Thickness of Selected Embankment

a. 35 cm for 5% CBR of Subgrade


b. 20 cm for 2% CBR of Subgrade

II. DESIGN PARAMETER

1 Design ESA = Cumulative ESA/106


2 AC Surface Course with Coefficient layer = 0.45 maximum value of flexible pavement
3 Granular Road-Base / Aggregate Base Class "A" with CBR ( minimum) = 90 %
4 Granular Sub-Base = Aggregate Base Class B with CBR ( minimum) = 35 %
5 Selected embankment with CBR ( minimum) = 10 %

III. DESIGN CALCULATION

NO. Package KM/STA Design Life Cumulative of ESA Design Thickness ( cm ) CBR of Design Thickness ( cm )
From To (year) Design Calculation AC Base A Subgrade (%) Base B

10 245,139,041 245.14 25 34 2 65
10 245,139,041 245.14 25 34 3 51
10 245,139,041 245.14 25 34 4 41
10 245,139,041 245.14 25 34 5 33
10 245,139,041 245.14 25 34 6 27

IV. DESIGN AJUSTMENT

Type of Marshall Stability Layer Thickness Design ( cm ) Remark


NO. Thickness (cm)
Pavement kg pound coefficient Capacity Required
individual Total TACx0.45

1 AC-WC1 900 1,982 0.41 4 1.63


2 AC-WC2/Binder 800 1,762 0.39 6 2.34
3 AC-Base 800 1,762 0.39 12 4.68 8.64 11.3 NO

Design Thickness / CBR of Subgrade


No Type of Base CBR (%) 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%

1 Base Class A 90 34 34 34 34 34
2 Base Class B 35 65 51 41 33 27
3 Selected Emb. 10 35 30 25 20 20
4 Subgrade 2

Total Thickness (cm) = 156 137 122 109 103


31

lue of flexible pavement

Total
Design Thickness ( cm ) Thickne
Selected Emb. ss ( cm)

35 159
30 140
25 125
20 112
20 106
DESIGN THICKNESS BY AASHTO-94/86 METHOD
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN

I. DESIGN THICKNESS CALCULATION

Marsh. Stab. Layer Drainage Design Thickness Structure DESIGN CAPACITY


NO. Type of Pavement (kg) or MR / Ec Coefficient coefficient Number
CBR(%) (a) (m) ( cm ) ( inches ) (SN) Log(ESA) ESA Life (Year)
a b c d e f = e/2.54 g=cxf h I = 10^h j

1 AC-WC1 800 0.39 4 1.57 0.614


2 AC-Binder 800 0.39 6 2.36 0.921
3 AC-Base 800 0.39 18 7.09 2.763
Struckture Number (SN1) = 4.298 8.070 117,617,411 11.53

4 Class "A"Base 90 29487 0.140 0.9 20 7.87 0.992


Struckture Number (SN2) = 5.290 8.047 111,350,875 11.03

5 Class "B"Base 35 15597 0.112 0.8 30 11.81 1.062


Total Struckture Number (SN3) = 6.352 8.128 134,405,590 12.82

6a Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 35 13.78 0.830


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 7.183 8.162 145,333,503 13.62
Subgrade 6 6415

b Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 20 7.87 0.475


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 6.827 7.850 70,810,601 7.54
Subgrade 5 5598

c Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 30 11.81 0.712


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 7.064 7.799 63,005,384 6.81
Subgrade 4 4738

d Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 45 17.72 1.068


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 7.420 7.753 56,665,242 6.20
Subgrade 3 3821

e Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 75 29.53 1.780


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 8.132 7.771 59,005,398 6.43
Subgrade 2 2822

II. BASIC EQUATION

Log ESA = -1.040 x 0.45 + 9.36 x Log(SN + 1) - 0.20 + [Log{ D PSI/(4.2-1.5)/{0.40+1094/(SN+1)^5.19}] + (2.32 Log MR - 8.07 )

n = LOG[1+{LN(1+g)*ESATotal}/(EALo*365)}]/LOG(1+g)

Structure Number ( SN ) Equation


SN1 = a1 x D1
SN2 = a1 x D1 + a2 x m1 x D2 = SN1 + a2 x m1 x D2
SN3 = a1 x D1 + a2 x m1 x D2 + a2 x m1 x D3 = SN2 + a3 x m2x D3

where, a1 = Layer coefficient of Asphalt pavement


a2 = Layer coefficient of Class "A" Base
a3 = Layer coefficient of Class "B" Base
D1 = Design Thickness of Asphalt pavement
D2 = Design Thickness of Base Class "A"
D3 = Design Thickness of Base Class "B"

06/12/2019 Page 16 of 23 424011658.xls


III. AASHTO DESIGN PARAMETER

Initial Daily ESA ( ESAL0) = 22,115 axles


Growth rate / year ( i ) = 4.0%
Design Life (year) - ( n ) = 10.0 years

n ESAL0 x 365
ESA is required = S --------------- x[{(1+i)n-1}]
0 ln(1+i)

= 98,836,652 axles

LOG ESA is required = 7.995

Given Assumptions are as follows :

Reliability R = 85%
Standard Normal Deviate ZR = -1.037
Standard Deviation S0 = 0.45 ( 0.40 - 0.50 ) for Flexible Pavement
Initial Serviceability P0 = 4.2 for Flexible Pavement
Terminal Serviceability Pt = 2.5 for Good condition

DPSI = ( P0- Pt )
Po = 4.2
Pt = 1.7

Subgrade (1) CBR = 2.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR1 = 2,822 psi MR1 = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
MR2 = 3,000 psi MR2 = 1500 x CBR

Subgrade (2) CBR = 6.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR1 = 6,415 psi MR1 = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
MR2 = 9,000 psi MR2 = 1500 x CBR

Subgrade (3) CBR = 10.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR = 9,399 psi MR = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
Layer Coefficient a4 = 0.075 a4 = 0.007276 + 0.029559 ln (CBR)

Base Class " B " CBR = 35 % MR = -588.164 +4552.276 ln ( CBR )


Resilient Modulus MR = 15597 psi a3 = 0.007276 + 0.029559 ln (CBR) or from
Layer Coefficient a3 = 0.112 Figure 2.6. page II - 21 AASHTO -86 or 93
Drainage Coefficient m2 = 0.8

Base Class " A " CBR = 90 % MR = -13231.786 +9493.533 ln ( CBR )


Resilient Modulus MR = 29487 a3 = - 0.062288 + 0.044965 ln (CBR) or from
Layer Coefficient a2 = 0.140 Figure 2.6. page II - 19 AASHTO 86 or 93
Drainage Coefficient m1 = 0.9

Layer Coefficients for AC a = 0.0285(MS)^0.35

AC-WC1+Gilsonite a1 = 0.45 MS = 1200


MS = 2643 lbs

SMA 0/11 a1 = 0.37 MS = 700 kg


MS = 1542 lbs

AC-WC1 a1 = 0.39 MS = 800


MS = 1762 lbs

AC Binder Course a1 = 0.39 MS = 800 kg


MS = 1762 lbs

AC Base Course a1 = 0.39 MS = 800 kg


MS = 1762 lbs

06/12/2019 Page 17 of 23 424011658.xls


10 YEARS DESIGN LIFE

ESA Log(ESA)
k l

98,836,652 7.995

06/12/2019 Page 18 of 23 424011658.xls


DESIGN THICKNESS BY AASHTO-94/86 METHOD
PAKET II/III : CIKAMPEK - PAMANUKAN

I. DESIGN THICKNESS CALCULATION

Marsh. Stab. Layer Drainage Design Thickness Structure DESIGN CAPACITY


NO. Type of Pavement (kg) or MR / Ec Coefficient coefficient Number
CBR(%) (a) (m) ( cm ) ( inches ) (SN) Log(ESA) ESA Life (Year)
a b c d e f = e/2.54 g=cxf h I = 10^h j

1 AC-WC1 800 0.39 4 1.57 0.614


2 AC-Binder 800 0.39 6 2.36 0.921
3 AC-Base 800 0.39 18 7.09 2.763
Struckture Number (SN1) = 4.298 8.070 117,617,411 11.53

4 Class "A"Base 90 29487 0.140 0.9 20 7.87 0.992


Struckture Number (SN2) = 5.290 8.047 111,350,875 11.03

5 Class "B"Base 35 15597 0.112 0.8 30 11.81 1.062


Total Struckture Number (SN3) = 6.352 8.128 134,405,590 12.82

6a Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 0 0.00 0.000


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 6.352 8.085 121,545,353 11.83
Subgrade 6 9000

b Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 10 3.94 0.237


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 6.589 8.024 105,794,550 10.58
Subgrade 5 7500

c Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 30 11.81 0.712


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 7.064 8.037 108,976,691 10.83
Subgrade 4 6000

d Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 55 21.65 1.305


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 7.657 8.028 106,755,014 10.65
Subgrade 3 4500

e Select. Emb. 10 9399 0.075 0.8 95 37.40 2.254


Total Struckture Number (SNT) = 8.606 8.035 108,485,626 10.80
Subgrade 2 3000

II. BASIC EQUATION

Log ESA = -1.040 x 0.45 + 9.36 x Log(SN + 1) - 0.20 + [Log{ D PSI/(4.2-1.5)/{0.40+1094/(SN+1)^5.19}] + (2.32 Log MR - 8.07 )

n = LOG[1+{LN(1+g)*ESATotal}/(EALo*365)}]/LOG(1+g)

Structure Number ( SN ) Equation


SN1 = a1 x D1
SN2 = a1 x D1 + a2 x m1 x D2 = SN1 + a2 x m1 x D2
SN3 = a1 x D1 + a2 x m1 x D2 + a2 x m1 x D3 = SN2 + a3 x m2x D3

where, a1 = Layer coefficient of Asphalt pavement


a2 = Layer coefficient of Class "A" Base
a3 = Layer coefficient of Class "B" Base
D1 = Design Thickness of Asphalt pavement
D2 = Design Thickness of Base Class "A"
D3 = Design Thickness of Base Class "B"

06/12/2019 Page 19 of 23 424011658.xls


III. AASHTO DESIGN PARAMETER

Initial Daily ESA ( ESAL0) = 22,115 axles


Growth rate / year ( i ) = 4.0%
Design Life (year) - ( n ) = 10.0 years

n ESAL0 x 365
ESA is required = S --------------- x[{(1+i)n-1}]
0 ln(1+i)

= 98,836,652 axles

LOG ESA is required = 7.995

Given Assumptions are as follows :

Reliability R = 85%
Standard Normal Deviate ZR = -1.037
Standard Deviation S0 = 0.45 ( 0.40 - 0.50 ) for Flexible Pavement
Initial Serviceability P0 = 4.2 for Flexible Pavement
Terminal Serviceability Pt = 2.5 for Good condition

DPSI = ( P0- Pt )
Po = 4.2
Pt = 1.7

Subgrade (1) CBR = 2.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR1 = 2,822 psi MR1 = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
MR2 = 3,000 psi MR2 = 1500 x CBR

Subgrade (2) CBR = 6.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR1 = 6,415 psi MR1 = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
MR2 = 9,000 psi MR2 = 1500 x CBR

Subgrade (3) CBR = 10.0 %


Resilient Modulus MR = 9,399 psi MR = 1,680.7598 ( CBR )^0.747564
Layer Coefficient a4 = 0.075 a4 = 0.007276 + 0.029559 ln (CBR)

Base Class " B " CBR = 35 % MR = -588.164 +4552.276 ln ( CBR )


Resilient Modulus MR = 15597 psi a3 = 0.007276 + 0.029559 ln (CBR) or from
Layer Coefficient a3 = 0.112 Figure 2.6. page II - 21 AASHTO -86 or 93
Drainage Coefficient m2 = 0.8

Base Class " A " CBR = 90 % MR = -13231.786 +9493.533 ln ( CBR )


Resilient Modulus MR = 29487 a3 = - 0.062288 + 0.044965 ln (CBR) or from
Layer Coefficient a2 = 0.140 Figure 2.6. page II - 19 AASHTO 86 or 93
Drainage Coefficient m1 = 0.9

Layer Coefficients for AC a = 0.0285(MS)^0.35

AC-WC1+Gilsonite a1 = 0.45 MS = 1200


MS = 2643 lbs

SMA 0/11 a1 = 0.37 MS = 700 kg


MS = 1542 lbs

AC-WC1 a1 = 0.39 MS = 800


MS = 1762 lbs

AC Binder Course a1 = 0.39 MS = 800 kg


MS = 1762 lbs

AC Base Course a1 = 0.39 MS = 800 kg


MS = 1762 lbs

06/12/2019 Page 20 of 23 424011658.xls


10 YEARS DESIGN LIFE

ESA Log(ESA)
k l

98,836,652 7.995

06/12/2019 Page 21 of 23 424011658.xls


DESIGN THICKNESS OF OVERLAY PAVEMENT
PACKAGE : 004 : PEMALANG - TEGAL
DATE : DECEMBER 2001

A. BASIC CALCULATION

1 Representative rebound Deflection (RRD) : From Benklemean Beam Test

2 Design Life ( Original Data ) : 10 years

3 Design of ESA : 21,270,872 axles

4 Design Thickness of AC : Using Figure IV-6, page 47'


Asphalt Institute - MS-17

5 Layer Coefficient

Basic of Layer Coefficient of AC aAC : 0.42

MS Layer Coefficient
Type of Pavement a1 = 0.0285 x MS0.35
kg pound

ACWC1+Gilsonite 1200 2643 0.45


ACWC2/Binder Course 800 1762 0.39
AC Base Course 800 1762 0.39
ATBL 750 1652 0.38

A. FIND THICKNESS OF PEVEMENT OVERLAY

Thickness Layer Struckture


1 Pavement Structure
cm Coeff. Number
(t) (a) (txa)

AC 4 0.45 1.80
ATBL 4 0.38 1.52

2 Total Structures Number SNR = TAC x aAC = 3.32

3 Layer Coefficient of AC aAC = 0.42

4 AC Thickness Requirered TAC = SNR / aAC = 7.91 cm

5 Representative Rebound Deflection RRD = 0.70 mm


ure IV-6, page 47'
stitute - MS-17

You might also like