ACCT2522 - Topic 2 Tutorial Questions 2019
ACCT2522 - Topic 2 Tutorial Questions 2019
ACCT2522 - Topic 2 Tutorial Questions 2019
The aim of this topic is to draw attention to the problems with using traditional costing systems to assign costs
to cost objects, especially products and services; and to introduce a contemporary costing system that
addresses these problems – the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system. In doing this, we compare the relative
merits of traditional and ABC techniques and explain when ABC systems are more appropriate. We also
consider how ABC information can be used for cost management and process improvement by tying this topic
to Activity-Based Management in Topic 1.
Langfield-Smith, K., D. Smith, P. Andon, R. W. Hilton and H. Thorne (2018). Management Accounting:
Information for Managing and Creating Value, 8th ed, McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. (Hereafter referred
to as LS)
Chapter 3 p. 82
Chapter 8 (including Appendix)
1. Explain the problems that may be associated with traditional/volume-based costing systems.
2. Describe and apply the activity hierarchy of costs and cost drivers.
3. Use ABC to measure overhead costs and assign costs to cost objects.
4. Evaluate the appropriateness of ABC.
5. Understand the limitations of ABC.
1
Tutorial Questions (must be prepared prior to the tutorial)
Additional Questions:
(a) Construct an excel spreadsheet to help solve P8.39 by determining the cost of each product line
using an ABC system.
(b) Briefly discuss other qualitative issues (i.e. issues that are hard to quantify) Territory Electronics
Company should consider when deciding on whether to continue or discontinue a product line.
(c) Discuss how Territory Electronics Company can use ABC information to initiate process
improvement.
Tech Ltd manufactures three types of tablets: TB (basic), TS (standard) and TP (premium). Tech
currently adopts a volume-based costing (VBC) system, and allocates its manufacturing overhead
costs (MOH) based on the number of tables produced. Tech is considering adopting an activity-based
costing (ABC) system. Hence, Tech implemented a pilot ABC system.
The VBC information collected for the month just ended are as follows.
TB TS TP Total
The cost of resources and resource drivers collected for the month just ended are as follows.
Quantity of
Resources $ Resource Driver Resource
Driver
Wages 1,625,000 # Employees 25
Electricity 200,000 # KW hours 10,000
Advertising 125,000 # Advertisements 10
Moulding machine depreciation 150,000 # Moulding machines 2
2,100,000
2
Four main activities and their activity drivers are identified as follows:
Required:
a) Using ABC, calculate the total cost for one TB, TS and TP tablet.
b) Should Tech implement an ABC system? Provide four (4) case facts to support your answer.
(Note: for the purpose of ACCT2522, we would consider the significance threshold to be 10% of
costs.)
3
a) Using ABC, calculate the total cost for one TB, TS and TP tablet.
4
b) Should Tech implement an ABC system? Provide four (4) case facts to support your answer.
(Note: for the purpose of ACCT2522, we would consider the significance threshold to be 10% of
costs.)
Fact 1:
Fact 2:
Fact 3:
5
Fact 4:
6
Question 3: Peter Alexander accused of charging 'plus-size tax' on pyjamas
By Melissa Singer
SMH 11 January 2019
Screen shots show plus-size items at Peter Alexander cost an extra $10 compared to identical items
in regular sizes.
Pyjama brand Peter Alexander has defended charging higher prices for plus-sized garments, citing
"different patterns" in the manufacturing process for larger sizes.
The brand came under fire on social media on Thursday after customers on its website spotted many
plus-sized styles were $10 dearer than their size 8-14 equivalents.
"I am one of the plus-sized customers and agree that it seems unfair to have been charged $10 more
for the navy pj's," Margaret Ingham posted on the brand's Facebook page, which featured many
similar comments.
"You can’t use the argument because you 'use less fabric' [for smaller styles] because if that’s the
case for your smaller sizes you would be charging less per size! Absolute garbage!" wrote Tash Britt.
Some customers queried why the men's range, which is available in seven sizes, had flat pricing,
while the women's range was split into "regular" and "plus-sized" styles, leading some customers to
accuse the brand of charging a "pink" or "fat" tax.
7
As of Friday, the website was still showing a price difference between the "PA Plus" range and regular
sizes.
In a statement, Peter Alexander said the plus-sized range used different patterns and the brand
produced smaller runs of each style, which meant prices had to be slightly higher than the regular
range.
"To ensure comfort and that the fit is right, we utilise a different pattern to our regular collection while
still maintaining a beautiful garment," the statement said. "It is these different patterns, along with the
size of the production run and to a lesser extent fabric consumption that impacts the price of the
styles. We try and limit this as much as possible, and as the category and production grows, we hope
to achieve parity across our collections."
Peter Alexander is not the first brand to face a consumer backlash for seemingly charging larger
people more to wear its clothes.
Last year, singer Christina Aguilera was slammed for charging $US5 ($7) more for larger sizes in her
tour merchandise, before the prices were adjusted.
International brands Old Navy and New Look have also been the subject of similar controversies.
Required:
Do you agree that Peter Alexander should charge higher prices for plus-sized prices? In your answer,
consider the reasons provided by Peter Alexander for charging higher prices and explain whether you
agree or disagree with them. (Note: You may want to think of the various costs mentioned and where
they lie in the activity hierarchy.)
8
Self Study Questions (complete in your own time)
Loki Electronics Ltd is currently using a conventional product costing system. While manufacturing
overhead costs form only 26% of total manufacturing costs, the majority of the costs are not driven by
the production volume. As a result, Ms Amanda Carter, Loki Ltd’s CFO, is contemplating changing
from the current volume based costing (VBC) system to an Activity Based Costing (ABC) system. As
this is a big change, she has decided to test the concepts of ABC on the Mobile Phone division of Loki
Electronics Ltd.
Loki Electronics Ltd’s Mobile Phone division produces five models of mobile phones. The following
information has been provided for the month of June 2007:
Costing Information
Quantity of
Resources $ Resource Driver Resource
Driver
Salaries 800,000 # Employees 200
Assembly machine depreciation 60,000 # Assembly hours 6000
Testing equipment depreciation 16,000 # Testing hours 2000
Motor Vehicle costs 60,000 # Kilometres travelled 20000
936,000
9
The Mobile Phone Division has three main activity pools:
Required:
10
Solutions to Self Study Question 1
Cost per
Cost Per Total Activity Drivers Consumed Activity
Activities Activity Driver
$ $
Assembly setup 84,000 # Assembly Batches 20 4,200.00
Quality testing 24,000 # Mobile Phones produced 2000 12.00
Distribution 46,000 # Distribution Batches 10 4,600.00
11
Calculative solutions to self study question 2
Note that there is no single correct answer to this exercise. Here are some reasonable solutions.
12
Property taxes 180 000
Natural gas, heating 45 000
Total $2 325 000
Cost driver: for costs allocated to support departments, square footage; for costs assigned to
products, number of units produced.
Requirement 1:
1 Interview salaried client $60 000/8000 $7.50 per interview
Interview business client 75 000/2000 $37.50 per interview
Obtain missing data 600 000/8000 $75 per follow-up call
Input data 120 000/400 000 $0.30 per data entry
Print return 90 000/10 000 $9 per return
Verify return 180 000/6000 $30 per hour
Rectify errors 90 000/6000 $15 per error
Submit return 30 000/10 000 $3 per return
13