5G RAN RFI Clarification

Agenda

 ZTE Introduction

 ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap

 RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A

2
 Leading 5G Standardization As Tier 1 Player

Vice chairman of RAN3 Vice chairman of SG17 and WP3

Rapporteurs of 3 study items Chairman of ITU-T SG15 WP3
Editors of 3 NR specifications

Board member
Co-chair of 802.11 Tgax PHY adhoc Vice chairman of international corporation group
Member of SA New Standard Committee Vice chairman of radio access working group

Funding member of ZSMISG Board member

Vice chairman of TC5

Vice chairmen of WG3/WG9/WG8/WG12 Initiate Member of NFV-ITI
Chairman of TC8 WG1
Vice chairman of TC8 WG2

4700+ 5G NR / NGC Proposals 2000 5G Patents, 1000 SEP NO.4

3
 ZTE 5G E2E Roadmap

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

5G Trials (NSA / SA) 5G Commercial Service

Access

Technical Research Trial Commercial Enhancement

Transport
Common Flexible Network Slicing
4G & Pre5G 5G NSA 5G SA
Core (support mMTC & uRLLC)
Core

IMS/VOLTE VoWIFI 5G Voice 1st Drop 5G Voice to full VoNR

Voice
Service 5G Slice E2E Slice Orchestration &
MANO
Orchestration Orchestration OSS Homogenisation
Orchestration
4
SA - Quickly Undertake 5G Business Needs

5GC
Architecture in one step;
Function introduced step by step

With Frozen
Terminal Standard
is coming soonand Rapid Development of Industry,
3-6 months

Commercially
SA will be Readyavailable in 19H2Scale Commercialization in 2019
for Large

Optimal performance of SA scheme

MM+terminal dual emission;
Performance of Uplink and downlink far exceeds that of NSA

5
Agenda

 ZTE Introduction

 ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap

 RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A

6
Spain Mobile Frequencies

Source: https://www.spectrummonitoring.com/frequencies/
7
5G Spectrum Strategy - Standalone

• Continuous coverage
3.4-3.8 GHz • eMBB service
(eMBB, VoNR) • VoNR

700 MHz • URLLC

(URLLC, VoNR) • VoNR (supplementary)

• Hotspot coverage
mmWave
• eMBB service
(eMBB)

8
5G BBU Product Roadmap
2018 2019 2020
- 15x 100MHz 64T64R @ N78 -30x 100MHz 64T64R @ N78
BBU - 60x 20M 2T4R @ N28 -120x 20M 2T4R @ N28

- ZTE ZXRAN Server

CU - COTS Server

Released Developing Planned Planning

6 Modes 15 NR Cells 250 Gbps

GSM, UMTS, NB-IoT, World Leading Capacity in 2U 2*25Gbps + 2*100Gbps
LTE FDD, LTE TDD, 5G NR with Own Baseband Chipset Interface Capability

9
Virtualized IT BBU - ZXRAN V9200

Specification
1 GSM: 540 TRXs
UMTS: 135 CSs
Capacity LTE: 90 * 20MHz 4T4R/8T8R ;
MM: 15 * 20MHz 64T64;
5G NR: 15 * 100M 64T64R
2 3 4 5
S1 Bandwidth 100 Gbps
1. Baseband Processing Board (VBP)/General Computing Board
(VGC)
2. Power Distribution Board (VPD)
Power
Less than 1700W
3. Power Distribution Board (VPD)/Environment Monitoring Board Consumption
(VEM)
4. Switching Board (VSW) Volume
5. Fan Array Module (VF) 88.4 mm*482.6 mm*370 mm
(H*W*D)
Weight 18 kg (with full configuration)

10
Series Radio Units for Diversified Scenarios

Main Stream Cost Effective

mmWave
64T64R 16T16R

200MHz 200MHz 800MHz

200W 200W 4T4R

@Macro Coverage @Macro Coverage @Hotspot, FWA

Sub1GHz Small Cell

Outdoor Indoor
20MHz 200MHz 800MHz 400MHz LTE 20M + NR 100M
2T4R 2*80W 4T4R 4T4R 4T4R 2T2R + 4T4R

@Wide Coverage, URLLC @Outdoor Hotspot @Indoor Coverage

11
5G Macro Cell Product Roadmap
2018 2019 2020
2017&Before Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

N28 R9212E 45M

Sub 1G 2T4R 2x80W
(2T4R) R9212E 35M
N8
2T4R 2x80W

A9611 200M A9631* 200M

N78 64T64R 200W 64T64R 200W

Sub6G A9621 400M

(64T64R/16T16R) 64T64R 200W

N78 A9603 200M A9623 400M

16T16R 200W 16T16R 200W

26/28G N257 A9815 800M

(4T4R) /N258 4T4R 62dBm

*Size and performance enhanced Released Developing Planned Planning

12
ZTE 5G Small Cell Product Roadmap
2019 2020 2021&later

R9105 200M R9115 200M

Outdoor N78 4T4R 4x5W
Pad RRU
/ Micro BTS
N258 BS9315 800M BS9325 800M
4T4R 53dBm(EIRP)

Indoor N257 BS9305 400M

Pico BTS /N258 4T4R

R8139
Indoor LTE 20M + NR 100M R8139
LTE + NR
Qcell 2T2R + 4T4R NR LAA
pBrige 2x125mw + 4x250mw
pRRU Connection & Power Supply
PB1120B 8*10GE Port

Released Developing Planned Planning

13
 ZTE 5G RAN Feature Roadmap
NR18.1 NR18.2 NR19.1 NR19.2 NR20
• 3GPP R15 NSA • 3GPP R15 NSA&SA • 3GPP R15 NSA&SA • 3GPP R15 NSA&SA • 3GPP R16 NSA&SA
• Architecture & Networking • Architecture & Networking • Architecture & Networking • Architecture & Networking • Architecture & Networking
--NSA Networking (Opt 3x) --SA Networking (Opt 2) --Het NET --NSA Networking (Option 7x/7a) --NSA Networking (Other Opt.)
--CU/DU Split (F1 interface) --NR-LTE Interworking • Radio Performance
• Radio Performance --Network Slicing • Radio Performance --Coverage Enhancement
--DL SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO (24 • Radio Performance --Coverage Enhancement Phase4 • Radio Performance
Layers) --Coverage Enhancement Phase3 --Interference Management --NOMA
--UL SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO (12 Phase2 --Interference Management Phase2 --DL 1024 QAM
Layers) --Beam Cooperation Phase1 --Beam Cooperation --Interference Management
--MU-MIMO ZF for PDCCH --Mini-slot --Beam Management and Enhancement @mmWave Phase3
--Coverage Enhancement --Grant-free Transmission Cooperation @mmWave --Mobility Enhancement
Phase1 --DL 256QAM --Mixed Numerology • DC&CA
--Beam Management --UL 256QAM(Trial) --UL 256QAM --DC(NR FR1+FR2)
--UL MMSE-IRC --Intra-band CA Phase3* • DC&CA
--Scheduling based on BWP • DC&CA • DC&CA --DC (LTE CA+ NR Inter-band CA)
• DC&CA --Inter-band CA Phase1 --Intra-band CA Phase2 • Service --Inter-band CA Phase3
--DC (LTE CA+ NR Intra-band CA) --Inter-band CA Phase2 --URLLC Phase3
--Intra-band CA Phase1 • Service
• Service --URLLC Phase1 • Service • Service
--Low latency service@n78 --Voice for SA (Trial) --URLLC Phase2 --URLLC Phase4
--Voice for NSA (Opt 3x) --EPS Fallback --Voice for SA --mMTC
--FWA
* Based on std development

2018Q2 2018Q4 2019Q2 2019Q4 2020Q2

Released Developing Planned Planning 14
Agenda

 ZTE Introduction

 ZTE 5G Solution Highlight and Roadmap

 RAN RFI Topic Discussion and Q&A

15
Coverage Enhancements by 5G NR – physical aspects

Terminal Multiple antenna Bandwidth

Enhancement Technology Advantage

~20MHz
4G terminal 5G terminal 4G LTE

5G NR
~100MHz
23dBm 26dBm
Multiple antenna enables flexible Bandwidth advantage can be
beam forming, decreases inter- transformed to coverage advantage
Single TX Dual TX user interference and increases BS via allocating more resource for edge
antenna antenna receiving sensitivity UEs and lowering inter-BS interference

16
 Coverage Enhancements by 5G NR – system aspects
Hybrid MU/SU CRS free Design
NSA
Beamforming 16 steams • There is no always on CRS signal in 5G NR, which saves RE

…
needs 16 UEs
resource and eliminates the inter cell interference
• 2 stream SU-MIMO × 12 UEs
=24 streams SA
• More easy for MU pairing

…
• Less resource consumption on
control channel
24 streams needs only 12 UEs

CSI-RS Enhancement Beamed BC and CC Channel

CDM8 (FD2, TD4),32 port,Density=1 [RE/RB/port]

• Initial access, Handoff, SIB, paging can all be based on beam

• Beamed CRS-RS for beam
management;
searching, tracking and recovery;
• Power is more focused, leading less inter-channel interference;
• Maximum 32 ports;
• Enhanced codebook;
• Feedback on amplitude and phase;
l0 l 6 l  13

17
 Multi-user Simulation Results – Uplink
 NR 3.5GHz provides a much better UL edge data rate due to its advantage in multi-user scheduling and interference
reduction;
 The average throughput of NR 3.5G is also much better than FDD 1.8G , which mainly comes from the frequency
efficiency increase via MU-MIMO in cell center area;
 The advantage of capacity and anti-interference in NR 3.5GHz can easily be transformed to coverage advantage

Uplink Cell Edge User Throughput (Mbps)—20UE Uplink Cell Average Throughput (Mbps)—20UE
1 0,942 70
63,52
0,9
60
0,8
0,7 50
0,6
0,471 40
0,5 31,66 31,76
0,4 30
0,307
0,3 20 17,20
0,2 0,150
0,101 8,31
10
0,1
0 0
FDD 1.8G (2R) FDD 1.8G (4R) TDD 1.9G (8R) NR 3.5G (16R) NR 3.5G (16R) FDD 1.8G (2R) FDD 1.8G (4R) TDD 1.9G (8R) NR 3.5G (16R) NR 3.5G (16R)
20% 40% 20% 40%

18
 Multi-user Simulation Results – Downlink
 DL edge data rate of NR 3.5GHz (64TR) is almost 10X compared with FDD 1.8G(2TR);
 The average throughput of NR 3.5G is almost 20X compared with FDD 1.8G(2TR);
 Regarding both capacity and coverage, NR 3.5GHz is far better than FDD 1.8GHz;

Downlink Cell Edge User Throughput (Mbps)-20UE NR Cell Average Throughput (Mbps)-20UE
14,00 13,14 1000,0
911,7
900,0
12,00
800,0
10,00 682,5
700,0
8,12
600,0
8,00 499,8
500,0
6,00
4,51 400,0

4,00 300,0
200,0
2,00 1,12 1,40
100,0 46,9 53,8
0,00 0,0
FDD 2TR FDD 4TR NR 16TR NR 32TR NR 64TR FDD 2TR FDD 4TR NR 16TR NR 32TR NR 64TR

19
 3.5GHz NR vs FDD 1.8GHz Test in Shenzhen - China
Indoor/Outdoor Coverage Test 4G/5G Collocated Sites Outdoor Coverage Test Dive Route Site AAU&Antenna

3.5GHz
5G AAU

1.8G
Antenna

 One 4G/5G collocated site for indoor coverage test and another 4G/5G collocated site for outdoor coverage drive
test. 3.5GHz NR AAU and 1.8GHz FDD-LTE antenna mounted on the same pole.
20
 Indoor Coverage Comparison NR 3.5G vs. FDD 1.8G
 17 locations on Floor 2 and Floor 6 of the target building were selected for UL throughput test;
 Roughly 100%-150% average throughput gain from 5G NR to 1.8G FDD-LTE.

UL Throughput UL Throughput
(Mbps) (Mbps)

Location Location

21
 Outdoor Coverage Comparison NR 3.5G vs. FDD1.8G
UL Throughput FDD NR Distance to BS
与基站距离（米）
100,00 900
90,00 800
80,00 700
Throughput (Mbps）

70,00 600

Distance (m)
60,00
500
50,00
400
40,00
30,00 300
20,00 200
10,00 100
0,00 0

Time

5G RSRP 5G UL Throughput 4G RSRP 4G UL Throughput

22
Mobility - ZTE Support NSA/SA HO defined in 3GPP Rel15
Mobility with SA Option 2
Operation NR<->NR NR->LTE LTE->NR
Intra Frequency √ √ √
PS Handover
Inter Frequency √ √ √
Cell Selection and Intra Frequency √ √ √
Reselection Inter Frequency √ √ √
Intra Frequency N/A √ N/A
Redirection
Inter Frequency N/A √ N/A
Mobility with NSA Option 3x
NR Operation Secondary Node Secondary Secondary Node
LTE Change Node Add Release
Intra-Master Node Intra Frequency √ √ √
Handover Inter Frequency √ √ √
Inter-Master Node Intra Frequency √ √ √
Handover Inter Frequency √ √ √
All Option 2 mobility ítems supported in NR18.2. All Option 3x mobility ítems supported in NR 18.1 23
SA vs NSA: Overview

Service Performance Flexibility Cost

 5GC introduced by SA  NSA terminals can only  NSA needs much more  SA is the final target while
mode will enable operators transmitted with single effort in existing NSA is a transient
more power for service antenna at NR network upgrade, architecture
innovation in vertical Under SA NR and LTE can
 SA has better uplink evolved independently  With similar scale, NSA
industry
coverage and downlink while under NSA NR and needs less CAPEX for initial
 NSA (Option 3 series) performance than NSA LTE are tightly coupled deployment, but needs
mode can only provide additional CAPEX for 2nd
 SA has better user  Under NSA operator
eMBB service upgrade to SA in the
experience for DL/UL has no flexibility for future. So the ultimate TCO
data rate vendor selection with NSA is bigger than SA
 NR 3.5GHz can be co-  Inter system IoT can
located with FDD 1.8G 2R guarantee service
to form a continuous SA continuity in SA early
coverage deployment

24
 Service: 5GC enables more opportunities
 With the 5GC, operators can provide 5G end to end services experience.
 5GC new features, including SBA, network slicing, finer flow based QOS, flexible networking, open API offer operator with more
opportunities on 5G new services.

Service Based Architecture Network Slicing Refined QoS Flexible UP

 EPC support new service  Although EPC can can support

support  Bearer is minimum
minimum size
size  EPC gateway
gateway isis hard
hard to
tobebe
and function through patch, multiple data
data communication grading of EPC QoS
QoS control,
control, deployed down
down toto the
the edge,
edge,
relatively difficult and slow communication
network (DCN), anetwork
single user too coarse to meet
meet the
the and also with
with related
related billing
billing
extension (DCN),
can onlya be
single user cantoonly
connected one increasing finer
finer QoS
QoS and routing issues.
issues.
5GC, service based be
DCN connected
at a time.to one DCN at requirement.
requirement.  5GC’s user plane
plane gateway
gateway
architecture like IT, loose a5GC
time.virtualizes multiple can be deployed
deployed anywhere
anywhere
coupling among functions. 5GC
logical virtualizes multiple
network slicing within 5GC provide a refined
refined Qos
Qos flexibly to provide
flexibly to provide most
most
Comply with 3GPP, customize logical network
one physical slicingand a
network, control with
with minimum
minimum sizesize appropriate routing for
appropriate routing for users.
function and open interface, within one physical
single user network,
can connect to grading of Qos flow.
flow. users.
easier for inter-vendor and a single
different user can
network slicing Operators can offer
offer more
more
integration connect to different
simultaneously network
for different precise, content
content based
based value-
slicing simutaneousltfor
scenarios. value-added services.
added services.
different scenarios.

25
 Performance: SA outperforms NSA
Comparing to dual layer transmission for SA UE, only single layer UL
transmitting for NSA UE at 3.5GHz band, so that for NSA:
 UL coverage decays by 3dB: With only 23dBm transmitting power, UL coverage of Avg. DL Cell Throughput (Mbps) NSA SA SA Gain
3.5GHz will be severely impaired. 16TR 458.3 536.6 +17%
 Single user UL throughput reduces by 50%: Dual layer transmission of SU-MIMO is
lost at UL. 64TR 883.8 981.2 +11%
 Cell DL throughput drops by 10%: simultaneous MU-MIMO and SU-MIMO are not
designed for NSA

In NSA mode, only single layer UL transmitting, with

NR UL
power of 1*23dBm for UE
LTE UL

UL cell coverage radius (m) NSA SA SA Gain

DL Beamforming
DL forged Beamforming
2Mbps UL edge throughput @ 16TR 153 219 +43%
2Mbps UL edge throughput @ 64TR 172 247 +43%
512Kbps UL edge throughput @ 16TR 221 313 +42%
In NSA mode, with only single layer UL transmitting
for UE, performance of DL beam forming is severely 512Kbps UL edge throughput @ 64TR 249 353 +42%
impacted, especially the overall performance of
MU-MIMO plus SU-MIMO
NR 3.5GHz, TDD DL:UL=4:1
26
Performance: Requirements for typical 5G services
Service type Bandwidth Latency NSA Feasibility SA Feasibility Remark

HD video(4K) 18Mbps 10ms 4K will be the dominant video format in 5G era

VR/AR(4K) 45Mbps 16ms These requirements are only based on 4K, more
stringent requirements may be needed for higher
resolution
V2X(including 100Mbps 3ms Requirements for IoV are very complicated, here only
autonomous driving) refers to L5 level autonomous driving

Remote control 100M~1G 20ms Includes mechanic engineering, drone, remote

surgery

Intelligent <1Mbps 5ms Intelligent manufacture has wide coverage, here

manufacture mainly refers to robot in unmanned factories

Smart Grid *Kbps 5ms Here mainly refers to control requirements in smart
Grid, not including video surveillance

For initial 5G launch service may limited to eMBB type such as HD video or VR/AR, experienced data rate
of 50Mbps per user is a reasonable requirement, which is a important guide for 5G network planning

27
Deployment: SA makes deployment easier
 In NSA mode, LTE eNB requires a large modification. Complex interoperability between 5G NR and LTE. Tight coupling for 5G
and 4G leads to inflexible 5G vendor selection, complex operation and evolution.
 In SA mode, loose coupling for 5G and LTE makes evolution and deployment easier and simple.

ITEM NSA SA SA advantage

Software
Impact for LTE eNB Huge modification(1) SA has less impact for LTE eNB
configure(2)
5G and LTE Inter-vendor or Easier deployment, flexible vendor
intra-vendor only
interoperability Intra-vendor selection by SA
Separate
Conjunct evolution
Evolution evolution for 5G SA has flexible networking
for 5G and LTE(3)
and LTE
Note：
1. eNB upgrade, expansion, additional X2 interface. DC anchor band selection and related configuration.
2. Only eNB configuration upgrade for IOT (handover, reselect, etc.)with 5G gNB.
3. Evolution from NSA to SA, LTE eNB need upgrade and modify configuration (delete X2, add IOT with 5G),
5G NR also need upgrade and modify configuration (add NG, XN, IOT with LTE)

28
 Cost: SA has lower comulative cost.
SA is the final target architecture while NSA is just intermediate. Two step SA (NSA-
One >SA)
Operators can go directly with SA, or NSA first then evolve to SA. Cost
Cost Item step
category Initial Evolve
Under the same scale, two step approach may bear higher SA
NSA to SA
accumulative investment cost than one step approach with the NR Equipment √ √
following four extra cost: SW Upgrade (NSA->SA) √
 NR upgrade New 5G NR Engineering
√ √
(Installation/Optimization)
 4G eNB modification Engineering (NSA->SA Optimization) √
 EPC upgrade and expansion 4G eNB SW upgrade (4/5G interoperability) √ √
Upgrade/mo
 Transmission reconfiguration dification SW upgrade/expansion (NSA DC) √

5GC Equipment √ √
One step Approach Two step Approach New 5GC Engineering
√ √
(Installation/Optimization)
new NR new NR NR upgrade
SW upgrade (4/5G interoperability) √ √
4G eNB SW upgrade
4G modification (NSA)
4G eNB SW upgrade EPC
(Interoperability) (Interoperability)
Upgrade/mo
new 5GC new 5GC dification SW upgrade/expansion (NSA DC) √
EPC upgrade (interoperability) EPC upgrade and expansion EPC upgrade (interoperability)
Transmission expansion/ new (5G) √ √
Transmission
new transmission or expansion new transmission or expansion Transmission Re-configuration
expansion/ Transmission modification (4/5G DC) √
Initial NSA Evolve to SA new
Transmission modification (NSA->SA) √
Common cost Extra cost
29
ZTE 5G RAN Split Solution
Low layer DU/AAU split Split interface between CU&DU defined by 3GPP

Low- High- Low- High- Low- High-

RF PHY PHY PDCP RRC
MAC MAC RLC RLC

Option8 Option7 Option6 Option5 Option4 Option3 Option2 Option1 Data

Low- High- Low- High- Low- High-

RF PHY PHY PDCP RRC
MAC MAC RLC RLC

Data

• eCPRI is born with 5G to solve CPRI bandwidth issue, it’s a part

BBU DU of 5G RAN split and it defines demarcation point between AAU
and DU
CPRI eCPRI • Comparing with option 8 used in CPRI, Option 7 is a mainstream
choice for ZTE eCPRI split in industry.
RRU AAU

30
 ZTE 5G RAN Split Solution
Low layer DU/AAU split Split interface between CU&DU defined by 3GPP

Low- High- Low- High- Low- High-

RF PHY PHY PDCP RRC
MAC MAC RLC RLC

Option8 Option7 Option6 Option5 Option4 Option3 Option2 Option1 Data

Low- High- Low- High- Low- High-

RF PHY PHY PDCP RRC
MAC MAC RLC RLC

Data

Cell Split Option Bandwidth (MHz) Ant. Port Layers Fronthaul Requirements

Option 8 100 64 16 208 Gbps

5G NR
Massive MIMO Option 7-2
100 64 16 25 Gbps
(Layer mapping)

31
 Multiple Options for Telefonica Flexible Deployment
Cloud CU
D-RAN C-RAN

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5

Integrated CU/DU Integrated CU/DU/AAU Centralized DU/CU Cloud CU, Centralized DU Cloud CU, Integrated DU/AAU

EPC/5GC EPC/5GC EPC/5GC EPC/5GC EPC/5GC

Cloud CU Cloud CU

Centralized Centralized
CU+DU DU

CU+DU

AAU AAU+CU+DU AAU AAU AAU+DU

32
 CU/DU Deployment Solution for Different Services

mMTC： CU Cloud

• huge connections 5G AAU DU CU

• latency sensitive
• cost sensitive
AAU/CU/DU integrate CU Cloud

5G AAU+DU CU
eMBB：
• wide bandwidth CU/DU integrate
low latency
5G AAU DU+CU

URLLC： AAU/CU/DU integrate

• low latency low latency
• high reliability
5G AAU+DU+CU

Site Room Edge DC Regional DC

33
Synchronization

Standard Frequency Phase

FDD LTE 0.05ppm NA
TD-LTE 0.05ppm 3us
5G 0.05ppm 3us

GNSS

Baseb
and front haul
RF unit
unit

GPS: Most common 1588V2: No extra cable is needed Remote GPS: option

34
Synchronization

Grandmaster

Back haul Baseband front haul RF unit

unit

|T|<=1.5us,for base service

1588
|T|<=0.4us

GPS |T|<=1.5us

|T|<=130ns,for intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation of same

BBU
BBU |T|<=10ns,for |T|<=100ns |T|<=20ns
different board of
same BBU
35
 Security is present along the whole ZTE Product Lifecycle
R&D System Testing
Secure coding Vulnerability scanning
Requirement Automatic source code analysis Product security function testing
Code review Protocol robustness testing

Security requirement
System risk analysis Release & Delivery
Data protection requirement
Anti-virus scanning
@ Version integrity
Security hardening

System Design
Security architecture design
Open-source / third-party component
security assessment
Software security test design

36
 Typical Threats in the RAN Network
eNB/gNB
UU OMC

④
LDAP
EMS
①
②
③
Threats AMF/MME AUSF/UDM

Destruction Access Control

Data Integrity
Corruption Authentication
Vulnerability Removal Communication Securiy
Disclosure Data confidentiality UPF/S-GW/P-GW NG-Core Internet
Interruption Availbility
Privacy
Attacks Non-Repudiation

Major RAN Security Threats domain

① Sniffing and attecks on communication between UE and eNB/gNB from Wireless interface
② Sabotage of and/or unauthorized access to eNB/gNB etc
③ Attacks from the transmission links between eNB/gNB to Core Network or between Base Stations
④ Attacks on eNB/gNB Management System
37
ZTE RAN Security Pillars

Transport Security
Wireless Security
Air Interface Encryption VLAN
802.1X
Application
IPSec
Layer Security
MACSec
OM Security
Transport
Account Management
Layer Security Device Security
Authentication
Site Construction Security
Security Log
Equipment
Security Alarm Device Physical Security
Clock Synchronization Security Layer Security
Operating System Security
Security State Audit
Built-in Firework
and Monitoring
SSL/TLS Software Digital Signature
Sensitive Information Protect Port Security Management

38
3GPP R16 Voice & SMS Standard Evolution

3GPP Focusing on 5G SA (Option2) 3GPP Focusing on 5G SA (Option2)

R15 Basic Services R16 IMS Enhancement

Basic Voice Service IMS Enhancement

 Domain selection (MO call, MT call, SMS)  IMS network slice
 Interworking （N26-based interworking, dual-registration)  SBA-based Cx and Sh interfaces
 Voice fallback (EPS Fallback, RAT Fallback)  Npcf interface usage in IMS
 IMS APP server deployment in local environment
Scenario: IMS cloudification
SMS
 IMS-based SMS (SMS over IP)
 Control-plane-based SMS (SMS over NAS) Interoperability Enhancement
 5G SRVCC -direct interoperation between 5G and 3G: 5G UE
registers in the IMS, the UE falls back to 3G (CS voice) when
Emergency Call Service
UE makeing call or accept call and setup a dedicated bearer
 Emergency registration
Scenario: 3G coverage is better than 4G, and 3G is used as the
 Emergency call fallback
long-term wireless coverage technology

3GPP R15 has satisfied the requirement of commercial deployment of 5G Voice & SMS ( SA ).
3GPP R16 focuses on IMS enhancement, which is not a mandatory option. 39
 3GPP Standard 5G Voice Solution voice
Idle/Data,Registration/SMS

5G NSA Option3 5G SA Option2

VoLTE/CSFB EPS Fallback VoNR

IMS
IMS IMS

CS EPC 5GC
CS EPC CS EPC 5GC Sv/SGs N26
Sv/SGs Sv/SGs N26

2/3G LTE 5G NR
2/3G LTE 5G NR 2/3G LTE 5G NR

SRVCC VoNR &Handover

VoLTE&SRVCC or VoLTE&SRVCC or EPS Fallback
CSFB CSFB

 Core uses IMS + 4G EPC, supports CSFB to 2/3G  Core uses IMS + 5GC, supports EPS Fallback to 4G.  Core uses IMS + 5GC+ 4G EPC, voice continuity
guaranteed by PS domain.

Note: In NSA Option3 voice user plane bearer can be established on LTE or NR (decide by RAN). It has the same requirement for CN and VoLTE.

5G NSA uses VoLTE/CSFB solution; 5G SA uses VoNR or EPS Fallback.

40
Voice and SMS Solution for Option3
CSFB VoLTE + SRVCC
IMS
IP-SM-GW
Internet Internet
SCC AS CSCF

CS
EPC EPC
MSCS SGs SAE-GW MSCS SAE-GW
MME MME
CS
Sv/SGs
SGs
MGW MGW

RAN/GERAN eNodeB NR RAN/GERAN NR

eNodeB

handover

 Not Deploy VoLTE  Already Deploy VoLTE

CSFB to 2G/3G for Voice service; VoLTE under LTE coverage;
SMS over SGs. HO to 2G/3G with SRVCC when move out of LTE coverage;
SMS over SGs, or SMS over IP.

Under Option 3 architecture, UEs will be connected to EPC and reuse LTE voice solution.
Realize high speed data transmit through 5G DC. 41
Voice and SMS Solution for Option2 (5GC SA)
EPS Fallback Voice
Idle/Data
VoNR Voice
Idle/Data
Registration/SMS Registration/SMS
IMS IMS

CS EPC 5GC CS EPC 5GC

Sv/SGs N26 Sv/SGs N26

2/3G LTE NR 2/3G LTE NR

VoLTE&SRVCC EPS Fallback SRVCC VoNR & Handover

or CSFB

 NR hotspot Coverage:  NR large-scale coverage

• VoLTE for voice solution to avoid frequent handover between 5G • Smooth evolution to VoNR, handover to VoLTE in 5G cell edge
and 4G; • Both data and voice served by NR, better user experience
• Voice will fall back to EPS( a little more call establishment time) • SMS over NAS, or SMS over IP
• SMS over NAS, or SMS over IP

VoNR and EPS Fallback use the same IMS architecture, 5GC/NR or EPC/LTE act as voice bearers.
In inical time, VoLTE solution for NR hotspot coverage, then smooth evolution to VoNR as NR coverage grows. 42
5G Emergency Call Solution
AUSF UDM

I/S-CSCF

SMF+ EATF
AMF
UPF
A
NR
PSAP
P-CSCF
P

E-CSCF
PCF

AMF Functions SMF & UPF Functions: PCF Functions IMS Function
1. Supports local emergency service data 1. Supports emergency service data 1. PCF provides SMF with QoS Supports identifying 5G location
configure configure parameters and policies for emergency information and delivering to PSAP.
2. Supports emergency registration and 2. Supports emergency PDU session service PDU session UE Function
emergency PDU session setup setup 2. Supports to guarantee only emergency
Supports emergency fallback
3. Supports issue emergency service 3. Provides special QoS guarantee and service data transferred on the
indication and emergency fallback policy control for emergency service emergency PDU. NR Function
indication 4. UPF guarantee only emergency service Supports emergency fallback
4. Supports issue emergency call number data transferred on the emergency PDU.
list
5. Supports emergency fallback

5G emergency call solution does not require new features on 2/3/4G network. 43
Two Solutions of 5G SMS
SMS over NAS SMS over IP
IMS
SMS over IP
IP-SM-GW
IP-SM-GW
Nx
SMSC
SMSF 5GC SMSC
5GC
EPC EPC
SMS over NAS
LTE NR LTE NR

 SMS over NAS ( new SMSF)  SMS over IP

• UE registers to SMSF when registering in 5G. • When a UE registers in IMS through 4G/5G network, S-CSCF executes
• MO path: UE->AMF->SMSF->SMSC a 3rd party registration to IP-SM-GW.
• MT path: SMSC->SMSF->AMF->UE • MO call: UE->P/S-CSCF->IP-SM-GW->SMSC
 Currently the SMSF protocol is only a draft. It is recommended to adopt • MT call: SMSC->IP-SM-GW->P/S-CSCF->UE
MAP for the SMSF-SMSC interface. SMSF shall report its GT to UDM via the  This solution is the same as 4G SMS over IMS.
N21/Nudm interface for MT SMS routing.

Due to co-existence of different types of UEs and APPs, two solutions may both exist.
For voice-centric UEs, SMS over IP is the best choice, which implements both voice and SMS services.
For data-centric UEs, SMS over NAS is the best choice, which allows UEs not to load the IMS client and
simplifying the protocol stack for UEs. 44
 ZTE ElasticNet UME R18 Architecture
NMS / 3rd Party System

Unified Portal

Provisioning Monitoring System Security Northbound

and Openness
ZTE ElasticNet UME R18

TOPO Management Fault Management UME Health Check UME 3A Center

Northbound Adapter
Function
RAN Configuration Performance
Log Management
Management Management
UME Setting Center
Inventory and Hardware RAN Supervision ... Open API Service
Management Dashboard
Application data Backup Document
Service Provisioning and
Signaling Trace Analytics ...
Recovery ...
Upgrading
...
DocLite
... ...
...

NR LTE

45
ZTE ElasticNet UME Main Functions & Solutions

• Fault Management
• Configuration Management
Main
• Topology Management
Functions
• Performance Management
• RAN Supervision Dashboard
• Inventory Management • Security Solution
• Software Management Main • High Availability Solutions (HA,
• Security Management
Solutions BR, GR)
• Signaling Trace Management • NBI Solution
• VNF Management • Integration solution with MANO

46
gNB Commissioning Workflow – Plug & Play

IP Connection TLS Channel Self

gNB Power on gNB Self Test
Setup Setup to UME Commissioning

47
gNB Commissioning Tool - LMT

Site (gNB) EMS Server

(UME)
Debug ETH5

Router/Switch

Ethernet Port Ethernet Port

NE Test Computer
（OS: Windows）

Site-Commissioning Mode Scenario Description

Mode 1（Use WebLMT to commission a site Data file, version packet, commissioning regulation file in near end( laptop);
at local end） The transmision between EMS(UME) and the gNB.
Mode 2（Use WebLMT to commission a site Data file, version packet, commissioning regulation file in remote end(UME FTP server);
at remote end） No DHCP service.

48
 ZTE’s Device Roadmap
2018H2 2019H1 2019H2

SmartPhone SmartPhone
Engineer Sample Engineer Sample
Hand Sub6G Sub6G
set NSA NSA/SA
8150+X50 8150+X55
201812 201909

Indoor CPE Outdoor CPE

Engineer Sample Engineer Sample
MBB Sub6G NSA
NSA Sub6G/mmW
8150+X50 8150+X50
201812 201906

49
ZTE’s RAN IoDT Plan

2018 2019
NSA CS SA TQ
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Lab

Lab

Lab

Field

50
Energy Consumption

BBU AAU RRU

Spec Item
V9200 A9611 A9603 A9815 R9212E
Power Supply -48V DC -48V DC -48V DC -48V DC -48V DC
Voltage Range -40V DC -37V DC -37V DC -37V DC -37V DC
~ -57V DC ~ -57V DC ~ -57V DC ~ -57V DC ~ -57V DC
Typical Power
Consumption W 325W 980W 500W 450W 228W
(25℃)
Peak Power
Consumption W 650W 1,150W 630W 455W 490W
(35℃)
Heat dissipation for
325W 980W 500W 450W 228W
indoor equipment
Temperature Range(℃) -10~+55 -40~+70 -40~+55 -40~+55 -40~+55

51
Power Saving Features

Baseband processors
automatical shut down
based on traffic load
Automatic shut down of 5G
NR layers for multi-layer 5G
NR sites Automatic shut down of
Cell In a SRAN node with
NR and 4G deployed

52
4G Site Evolution to 4G/5G

add V9200 for 5G V9200 in full mode

5G uses new spectrum 5G uses new spectrum

Add 5G RU/AAU
Add 5G RU/AAU

…
…
2G/3G/4G RRU
2G/3G/4G RRU
B8200 V9200

V9200

SDR BBU and IT BBU give flexible and suitable choices for 5G evolution! 53
 V9200 supports 4G and 5G
Phase I: GULN+NR Phase II: GULN+NR Phase III: All 5G

+ + +
5G AAU Existing RRUs 5G AAU
2G/3G/4G RRU 5G AAU 2G/3G/4G RRU
upgrade SW to
support 5G
V9200 V9200 V9200
B8200
B8200

•Existing ZTE 6x/7x RRU’s, and beyond,

•Connect existing RRUs to V9200 to
•Legacy B8200 supports GULN can support NR through SW upgrade.
support GULN + 5G NR
•Introducing V9200 and 5G RRU •Legacy B8200 can be reused in other Panama R8862A/R8872A
to support 5G places Ecuador R8862A/R8872A
Nicaragua R8872A
54
 Use Cases and Deployment Strategy (1/ 2)

Use Case Deployment Strategy Rationale & Comment

mmWave FWA Option 3 or DC with NR in low bands Low coverage, low mobility requirements.

AR/VR eMBB slice in 3.5 GHZ, local CDN Latency less than 5ms to mitigate the “vertigo”
(MEC) effect -> CDN introduction.
URLLC NR FDD in sub1GHz band (700 MHz) FDD NR as coverage layer, providing URLLC &
voice as primary services. Latency
requirement may be as low as 0.5 ms E2E
(tactile interaction).
Massive IoT NR FDD in sub1GHz band (700 MHz), Introduction of a new RRC mode, RRC
although casuistics can be large connected inactive situation.

In general, NW slicing is regarded as a basic enabler for multiple use cases re-inforcing the option 2 as primary
architecture option.

55
 Use Cases and Deployment Strategy (2/ 2)

mMTC： CU Cloud

• huge connections 5G AAU DU CU

• latency sensitive
• cost sensitive
AAU/CU/DU integrate CU Cloud

5G AAU+DU CU
eMBB：
• wide bandwidth CU/DU integrate
low latency
5G AAU DU+CU

URLLC： AAU/CU/DU integrate

• low latency low latency
• high reliability
5G AAU+DU+CU

Site Room Edge DC Regional DC

56
 Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Requirement for URLLC
Use case V2N for mid/ long-term V2X for short term environment V2X for cooperation
Smart grid
attribute environment modelling modelling (sensor sharing) (coordinated control)
<3 ms end-to-end for <5ms E2E for
Not critical (100 ms end-to- transmission/ grid
platooning, backbone,
Latency end seems to be tolerable) <20 ms end-to-end
<10 ms end-to-end for <50ms for distribution
cooperative manoeuvres. and <1s for access
99.9% – 99.999% for the
Reliability Not critical 99% – 99.999% Critical (99.999%) different domains/
applications
Source: NGMN “Perspectives on Vertical Industries and Implications for 5G”

Use case Discrete automation – Electricity distribution – high

Tactile interaction Remote control
attribute motion control voltage
E2E 5ms
1ms 5ms 0.5ms
Latency
Reliability 99.9999% 99.9999% 99.999% 99.999%

Source: 3GPP TS22.261 “ Service requirements for the 5G system”

57
 E2E Latency Requirement for URLLC and eMBB
gNB
UE 5G AAU CU for URLLC Core
DU CU for eMBB/mMTC
New CPRI
Backhaul
URLLC UPF URLLC UPF

500 μs(URLLC) UE PDCP – gNB PDCP

4 ms (eMBB)
T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Interface Fronthaul Process Midhaul Process Backhaul
•<20~50 μs(eMBB) •Several ms(eMBB)
•<10~30 μs(URLLC)

Mini-slot
Processing Time BBU CPRI RRU UE
Length
Downlink <180μs 30μs <20μs 142μs/71μs <120μs
Uplink <200μs 30μs <20μs 142μs/71μs <100μs

58
URLLC in 3.5G is difficult for commercial deployment

With self-contained subframe configuration

3.5G TDD with PDSCH

30Khz SCS ACK:N+0

S S U S S S S S U S

• Due to cross-slot
interference, difficult to
deploy in network;
• Limited uplink slots lead to
uplink service bottleneck.

59
Some information about Maturity on URLLC

• According to our knowledge, commercial 5G chips are still focused on

eMBB service. Many URLLC related features are optional and not
supported.

• Enhanced URLLC features are still being standardized in R16

framework

• We are closely cooperating with top tier chipset vendor in

commercializing 5G eMBB networks and would also like to work with
Telefónica to push commercialization of URLLC as market matures
60
 ZTE URLLC Implementation Summary
ZTE URLLC
Target Description
Implementation
Frequency 700MHz
Antenna Configurations gNB 2T4R, UE 2T4R
Numerology eMBB: 15KHz +NCP, URLLC: 15KHz + NCP
# Mini-slot Based Scheduling & Transmission: 2 OS (Q4
Payload (32Bytes)
2018)
Low latency (0.5ms)
# Type 1 UL Grant-free Transmission with periodicity = 14
High Reliability (1e-5 with 1ms)
OS (Q4 2018)
Multiplexing URRLC and eMBB
Features # UL TB repetition in grant-free transmission within period
(Q2 2019)
# BLER-target and CQI table for URLLC (Q2 2019)
# DL Preemption Indication (Q4 2018)
# DL Semi-Persistent Scheduling with 1ms periodicity

61
OSS Integration, UNICA

• We’re willing to integrate our 5G system with TEF’s NMS, as we did for
3/4G

• We understand we’re in the process of VRAN RFI and are waiting for
next steps for the instruction from TEF

62
63
 Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact
64T64R 5G NR AAU - A9611
AAU
Advantages
• Smooth Evolution
• Large Capacity, High Output
A9611
Power
A9603
• Compact Design
A9815 • Smart Antenna Array,
Volume 57 L
Weight 40 kg Counter Interference
S35/S37: 200 W
Output Power
S45: 100 W
Application scenarios
IBW 200 MHz • The A9611 can be deployed
OBW 100 MHz in various scenarios, such as
S35: 3400-3700 MHz
sector coverage, hotspot, and
Operating Band S37: 3600-3800 MHz
S45: 4400-4800 MHz
high rise building coverage.
Antenna Gain 25.5 dBi
64
 Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact
16T16R 5G NR AAU - A9603
AAU
Advantages
• Smooth Evolution
A9611 • Large Capacity, High Output
Power
A9603
• Compact Design
A9815 • Smart Antenna Array,
Counter Interference

Volume 40 L Application scenarios

Weight 30 kg
Output Power 200 W • The A9603 can be deployed
IBW 200 MHz
in large capacity macro
OBW 100 MHz
scenarios.
Operating Band S35: 3400-3600 MHz
Antenna Gain 23.5 dBi
65
 Large-capacity, wide-bandwidth, compact
4T4R 5G NR AAU - A9815
AAU
Advantages
• Smooth Evolution
A9611 • Large Capacity, High Output
Power
A9603
• Compact Design
A9815 • Smart Antenna Array,
Counter Interference

Volume 20 L Application scenarios

Weight 18 kg
• The A9815 can be deployed
Output Power EIRP = 62 dBm
in various scenarios, such as
IBW 800 MHz
sector coverage, hotspot, and
OBW 800 MHz
high rise building coverage.
S28: 26500-29500 MHz
Operating Band
S26: 24250-27500 MHz
66
 Outdoor Small Cell (5G Pad RRU/BS)
Fiber
Remote/Local
Fiber Macro BBU

R9105 BS9315

Indices R9105 BS9315

Band n78 n258
Pad RRU Pad RRU
Carrier Width 100MHz 800MHz On pole
Wall mounting
Output Power 20W(4*5W) 53dBm(EIRP)

TXRX 4T4R 4T4R

CBD Community Shopping Street Airport
• DU integrated into mmWave AAU, with 2*400MHz Carriers
• One fiber is enough for each Pad-site
• Micro-Micro/Macro-Micro coordination, UDN

67
Indoor Small Cell – QCell Solution
Cat6A & Above
QCell 700 1800 2100 2600 3500
Fiber Multi bands
2T2R 2T2R 2T2R 2T2R 4T4R
pBridge Any combination of 3.5G NR and one LTE Band

Ethernet Multi mode 4G 5G 2G 3G

pBridge
pRRU R8139
100m

pBridge Item First channel Second channel

Channel 2T2R 4T4R
pBridge
700/1800/2100/2600MHz 3.5GHz N78:
Band
Select One LTE band 3542.5-3700 MHz
pBridge
Configuration 1 x 20M FDD LTE 5G NR 100M 4T4R
BBU OBW 20 MHz 100 MHZ
ZTE BBU Transmitting Power 2 x 125 mW 4 x 250 mW

68
5G Ready Product Make Simplified Network Evolution
2G/3G/4G 5G NR
5G Ready

One BBU
All Bands & All Modes
800MHz 1800MHz 2600MHz
900MHz 2100MHz 3500MHz Sub-6GHz mmWave

1 Time
Investment
Ultra-broadband
Multi-mode & Multi-band
2 Networks
Full Range
Services
eMBB
mMTC
Competitive 4G Network
Cloudification & Virtualization Ready for 5G Evolution URLLC

69
Remote Radio Unit — ZXSDR R9212E
Specification

L: 2*20 MHz LTE 2T4R cells

Capacity
NR: 2* 2T4R cells

415 mm
Max TOC 2*80W
TxRx 2T4R

Typical Power
230W in LTE Single Mode
Consumption

L: -112.2dBm@four antennas, band28

-112dBm@four antennas, band8
 Supporting 2T2R OR 2T4R cells Receiver Sensitivity
NR: -112.2dBm@four antennas, band28
 Small and light, fast deployment -112dBm@four antennas, band8
 Natural cooling and high reliability Power Supply -48V DC
Interface 2*9.8304Gbps CPRI interfaces
5G Ready Frequency band band8/band28
R9212E R9212E R9212E Protection Class IP65
Temperature Range -40℃ to +55℃

R9212E has 5G NR capable hardware and supports

flexible configuration of 4G and 5G.
70
 ZTE SDR Baseband Unit Hardware Roadmap

All kinds of BP boards

PM FS
FA
SA M
Indoor BBU CC
ZXSDR B8200 Outdoor BBU
ZXSDR B8902

2016&Before 2017 2018 2019&Later

Available Boards: Boards: B8902:

- GSM BP: UBPG, UBPG3 - Multi-Mode BP: - LTE Mode:
- UMTS BP: BPK_d, BPK_e, BPK_e1 - BPQ2: 12 LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers, - 12 LTE Cells
- LTE BP: BPL1, BPN0 or other Multi-mode configurations - Multi-Mode:
- Multi-Mode BP: BPN2 - BPQ0: 6 LTE Cells & 3 NB-IOT Carriers, - GSM/UMTS/LTE/NB-IOT
- CC: CC16B, CCE1B or other Multi-mode configurations
- FS: FS3A, FS5/FS5A, CR0 - BPQ3 (MM): 2 MM LTE Cells
Interface: - CC: CCF0
- 16E1(SA+SE), 1GE/FE(CC2/CC16B), 12
CPRI(2*FS)
- 2*10GE+2*1GE (CCE1B)

71
ZTE BBU - ZXRAN V9200 Roadmap
VBP VBP

Indoor BBU
ZXRAN V9200 VPD VSW/VGC VF
VPD/VEM
2 3 4 5

1.Virtualized Baseband Processing Board (VBPc1)/Virtualized General Computing Board (VGCc1) 2.Virtualized
Power Distribution Board (VPDc1) 3.Virtualized Power Distribution Board (VPDc1)/Virtualized Environment
Monitoring Board (VEMc1) 4.Virtualized Switching Board (VSWc1) 5.Virtualized Fan Array Module (VFc1)
Note: Suffix “c1” stands for the board/module type.

2018 2019 2020&Later

ZXRAN V9200 Boards : Boards :

- Control & Switch Board: VSWc - New Switching Boards: VSWd
- General Computing Board: VGCc1
- Baseband Processing Board:
- VBPc1: LTE, NB-IOT, UMTS, GSM Boards : Boards :
- 18 LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers or other - Baseband Processing Board: - Multi-mode BP Boards:
Multi-mode configurations - VBPc0: LTE, NB-IOT, UMTS, GSM - VBPd: 5G NR, LTE, NB-IoT, UMTS, GSM
- VBPc5: 5G NR - 12 LTE Cells & 6 NB-IOT Carriers or
other Multi-mode configurations

Released Developing Planned Planning

72
 Multi-Mode Radio Units HW Roadmap
2017&Before 2018 2019 2020
R9212E
600M 2*80W
Band28 R8854
4*40W

APT 700M R8862A R9212E R8854

Band28 2x60W 2*80W 4*40W

DD 800M RSU82 R8862

Band20 2x60W 2x40W
R8892N
800+900MHz
RSU82 R8881 R8863 2x(40+60)W
900M 2x80W 1x80W 3x80W R8852D R9212E R8854
Band8 R8862/A R8852E 2*80W 2*80W 4*40W
2x60W 2x80W

RSU82 R8881 R8863 R8854/D R8854E

2x80W 1x80W 3x80W 4x40W
1800M 4x60W R9214
Band3 R8862/A R8852E 4*40W
2x60W 2x80W R8892N R8892N R8894E
1.8+2.1GHz 1.8+2.1GHz 1.8~2.1GHz
2x100W 2x120W 4x80W
RSU82 R8881 R8863
2x80W 1x80W 3x80W
2100M R8854D
Band1 R8862/A R8852E R8854 4x40W
2x60W 2x80W 4x40W

Released Developing Planned Planning GA after PO 73

FDD Massive MIMO Products Roadmap

ZXSDR MM6612 L1800 Specification

Max TOC 80W Tx/Rx 32T32R
Antenna Gain 15dBi Interface 2x25Gbps CPRI interfaces
Dimension 999mm*699mm*145mm Weight <47kg
Frequency
1805MHz-1880MHz(band3) Bandwidth 20MHz, 15MHz, 10MHz
band

2017&Before 2018 2019 2020&Later

Trial: MM6612 A9212 A9212

- B3 1.8G - B3 1.8G, 80W - B1&B3 1.8G+2.1G, - B7 2.6G
- 32T32R - UL MU-MIMO 200W
- 10/15/20 Bandwidth - UL 32R MRC/IRC
- TM9 3D Beam forming - DL MU-MIMO
- TM3 Virtual Beams - Intra band 2CC MM CA
- Inter band MM&Non-
MM 2CC CA

Released Developing Planned Planning

74
4G Site Evolution to 4G/5G(Backup)

V9200 works with B8200 V9200 in full mode

5G uses new spectrum

Add 5G RU/AAU 5G uses new spectrum
Add 5G RU/AAU

…
…
2G/3G/4G RRU
2G/3G/4G RRU
B8200 V9200

V9200

SDR BBU and IT BBU give flexible and suitable choices for 5G evolution! 75
 Existing B8200 interworking of 4G and 5G(Backup)
Existing network Evolve to Option3x Evolve to Option7x

+ +
2G/3G/4G RRU 2G/3G/4G RRU 5G AAU 2G/3G/4G RRU 5G AAU

B8200 B8200 V9200 B8200 V9200

B8200 supports GULN

• Panama •Add V9200 and 5G AAU to support LTE upgrade to eLTE
CC：CC2/CC16/CC16B/CCE1
BP：BPL1/BPN0/BPN2 5G NR
• Ecuador •RRU can be reused by SW upgrade •RRU can be reused by SW upgrade
CC：CC2/CC16B/CC17B/CCE1/CCE1B •BBU •BBU
BP：BPL/BPL1/BPL1A/BPN2 Existing BPN0 and BPN2 can be reused Existing BPN2 can be reused
• Nicaragua Existing CCE1B/CCF0 can be reused Existing CCE1B/CCF0 can be reused
CC : CC16B/CCE1
BP : BPN0/BPN2 76