Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    Ichiro v. Ippo Et Al. Manifestation-Draft2

    Uploaded by

    Enrico P. Papio
    1. Captain America filed a manifestation with the court stating that he discovered men dismantling buses owned by the business he jointly owns with Iron Man, despite an ongoing litigation over the business. 2. Captain America reported the incident to the barangay and police. With police assistance, he stopped the men from further dismantling two buses. 3. Captain America asserts that Iron Man continues fraudulent acts against their joint business interests, in disregard of the ongoing court case. He requests the court to note this manifestation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ichiro v. Ippo Et Al. Manifestation-Draft2

    Uploaded by

    Enrico P. Papio
    27 views2 pages
    1. Captain America filed a manifestation with the court stating that he discovered men dismantling buses owned by the business he jointly owns with Iron Man, despite an ongoing litigation over the business. 2. Captain America reported the incident to the barangay and police. With police assistance, he stopped the men from further dismantling two buses. 3. Captain America asserts that Iron Man continues fraudulent acts against their joint business interests, in disregard of the ongoing court case. He requests the court to note this manifestation.

    Original Title

    Ichiro v. Ippo et al. Manifestation-Draft2.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. Captain America filed a manifestation with the court stating that he discovered men dismantling buses owned by the business he jointly owns with Iron Man, despite an ongoing litigation over the business. 2. Captain America reported the incident to the barangay and police. With police assistance, he stopped the men from further dismantling two buses. 3. Captain America asserts that Iron Man continues fraudulent acts against their joint business interests, in disregard of the ongoing court case. He requests the court to note this manifestation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    27 views2 pages

    Ichiro v. Ippo Et Al. Manifestation-Draft2

    Uploaded by

    Enrico P. Papio
    1. Captain America filed a manifestation with the court stating that he discovered men dismantling buses owned by the business he jointly owns with Iron Man, despite an ongoing litigation over the business. 2. Captain America reported the incident to the barangay and police. With police assistance, he stopped the men from further dismantling two buses. 3. Captain America asserts that Iron Man continues fraudulent acts against their joint business interests, in disregard of the ongoing court case. He requests the court to note this manifestation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    National Capital Judicial Region


    REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
    Branch 69,
    Quezon City

    CAPTAIN AMERICA,
    Plaintiff,

    -versus-
    Civil Case No. R-QZN-17-08383-
    CV
    For: Partition of Co-Ownership,
    Recovery of Properties.

    IRON MAN,
    Defendant.
    x-----------------------------------------x

    MANIFESTATION

    Plaintiff, CAPTAIN AMERICA, through counsel and unto this


    Honorable Court, most respectfully states:

    1. In support of the allegations made by the plaintiff Captain


    America in his Judicial Affidavit that defendant Iron Man indeed
    employed fraudulent schemes in running the businesses she and
    plaintiff jointly owned, the plaintiff on 06 February 2019 made an
    ocular inspection to the service bay/depot site (“site”) of their
    transport business Pinetree located in Commonwealth, Quezon City.
    To plaintiff’s surprise, he saw three (3) men in the act of dismantling
    and wrecking the buses commonly known as “kinakahoy” in the
    transport business parlance found within the perimeter of the said site
    while the other one was outside the perimeter. When plaintiff asked
    for their names and the reason for their actions considering the
    subject buses are under litigation, the men replied they were just
    following the orders of a certain “Bossman” but failed to disclose their
    names.

    2. The plaintiff being fully aware that he has no colour of


    authority to prevent the men in finishing their tasks; the plaintiff went
    to the Barangay Hall to report the incident. A copy of the Blotter
    Report is herein attached as Annex “A”. Since the Barangay
    Captain was absent when the plaintiff reported the said incident on 06
    February 2019, the latter went to a nearby police station to request
    assistance to accompany him to the site to stop the alleged men from
    fully accomplishing their task. Plaintiff was able to secure the
    assistance of the police authorities and went to the site. Upon arrival,
    the plaintiff entered the premises while the members of the police
    remained outside the perimeter. Once inside, the plaintiff introduced
    himself to the alleged men as part-owner of Pinetree transport and
    requested the men to stop whatever they are doing since the subject
    buses are under litigation. Although the men heed the request of the
    plaintiff, there were already two (2) buses inside the site that were
    fully dismantled. A copy of the pictures taken by the plaintiff showing
    the dismantled buses are herein attached as Annex “B”.

    3. It is worth noting that in spite of the pending litigation


    between the plaintiff and defendant over their joint businesses in
    question, the defendant in blatant disregard to the authority and
    process of the Court continues to commit such fraudulent acts to the
    detriment and prejudice of the plaintiff.

    PRAYER

    WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully


    prayed that the Honorable Court duly NOTES this Manifestation.

    Other measures of relief, just and equitable under the


    circumstances, are likewise prayed for.

    Pasig City for Quezon City, 18 February 2019.

    MAT & JESS


    Attorneys-at-law
    Counsel for the Plaintiff
    Captain America
    Unit 69-A Strata 2000 Building
    Emerald Avenue, Ortigas Center,
    Pasig City 1600
    Tel. No. (632) 633-8673
    Telefax No. (632) 633-7501 loc. 143

    By:

    STEVEN HARVEY
    PTR No. 2512777; 01/04/17; Pasig City
    IBP No. 11055720; 01/04/17; Pasig City
    Roll of Attorneys No. 29573
    MCLE Compliance No. V-0016978;
    03/16/16

    You might also like