Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2013

Infrastructure

URBAN INDIA: CHALLENGES FOR GREEN

INFRASTRUCTURE

Mahua MUKHERJEE
Department of Architecture & Planning, IIT Roorkee, India, [email protected]

Summary
Cities and towns in India are centres for economic activities, investments, technologies,
livelihoods and innovations. Skill, capital and knowledge are readily available in urban
areas than rural India. Continuous migration alongwith natural growth of population adds
pressure on urbanization. Vertical city with green infrastructure (GI) is the image of urban
aspiration for India’s cities and towns now. Examples for GI are rapid rail transit, urban
forestry, water bodies etc. They bring benefits to urban environment and thus offer better
urban experience.
GIs can be categorized in several systems with set of functions under each of them.
Policies and strategies for development and implementation of these GI are evolving with
time to accommodate citizens’ aspirations. There are certain implementation issues which
require redressal from various urban authorities who develop or maintain GIs. Multiple
approving authorities, disparity in resource sharing within same city and among different
cities, affordability of users, short-term solution inviting/triggering problems in longer time
frame, objective performance appraisal, maintaining standard of facilities and quality are
some such problems in general and with specific reference to Indian cities. Efforts and
challenges faced by different Indian cities and framework to evaluate GI is the focus of this
article.

Keywords: India, urban development, green infrastructure, greener evaluation

1 Introduction
In India, population and urbanization has increased manifolds in recent times. The Census
of India, 2011 (Provisional Data) provides a glimpse of such changes; with a population
base of more than 1.22 billion, urban housing deficit is touching 23 million, and 40 million
rural Housing units are required to meet the demand. Increased migration to urban areas has
increased phenomenally as economy has grown at 8 % per annum. The Town & Country
Planning Organisation of India defines a settlement as a town when it has a minimum
population of 5000 and at least 75 percent of male working population engaged in non-
agricultural pursuits; and lastly a density of population of at least 400 persons per sq. km.
There are 31 cities with more than 10 lac (1 million) population.
Cities and towns in India are centres for economic activities, investments,
technologies, livelihoods and innovations. Skill, capital and knowledge are readily
available in urban areas than rural India. Continuous migration alongwith natural growth of
population adds pressure on urbanization. Vertical city with green infrastructure is the
image of urban aspiration for India’s cities and towns.

1
CESB13 Prague
Infrastructure

2 Challenges for urbanity in India

Rapid urbanization, young aspirational cititizens, land scarcity are character of India’s
urban face. Multiple approving authorities, disparity in resource sharing within same city
and among different cities, affordability of users, objective performance appraisal, are
some such problems in general and with specific reference to Indian cities.
Green space is one among the three components which complete the matrix of urban
built environments; buildings and other open spaces like pavement, parking being the other
two. Urban neighbourhood in a way reflects social characters like education, economy,
technology etc. They contain many built elements of varying scales and different levels
like individual building, street or entire neighbourhood. Building is most noticed urban
fabric in a neighbourhood. It modifies the ambient surrounding environment while creating
protective, efficient internal spaces for users. It occupies ground and introduces new
horizontal and vertical surfaces; intercepts solar radiation, wind movement, rain etc. In
a way it is the cause for changes in the environment where it has entered/intruded.
Depending on strategies employed it brings varied degree of modification in ambient
thermal environment and contributes to Urban Heat Island (UHI) phenomenon. In each
level, green and other open spaces play distinct roles which inadequately get
acknowledged for environmental impact assessment, whereas buildings get the prime
attention.
Greenery has the quality to naturalize and complement a man-made environment. It
can directly contribute to physical and psychological comfort of users. Many scientific
studies conducted all over the world have quantified the benefits of greenery in terms of
temperature reduction, wind flow modification, humidity control and boost of work
capacity. They can be strong mitigation tool for many anthropogenic or natural disasters
as well. In a very similar way impact of other open spaces are also being explored
scientifically and will continue to be studied.
In recent times, sustainability dilemma in urban development brought debate on
issues like “sustainability and sustainable development”, “preservation and conservation”,
“adaptation and mitigation” and/or “new development and restoration” in the forefront.
A campus, by virtue of being a regulated idealistic autonomous society in any country, can
play role model for built-environment; and a short-or long- term residential experience
within these would create a constructive impression on young generation to carry forward
for future. So, a neighbourhood can play a much bigger role in 4D i.e. time, and shall
accommodate all three urban elements with right balance to respond to sustainability
dilemma. But there is no such quantitative simplistic method towards this balancing act.
The interrelationship depends on their quantitative and qualitative presence, which in turn
depend on issues like activity requirements, climate, socio-economical & technical etc. So
the question how and to what extent greenery needs incorporation in neighbourhoods will
again fetch different answers/requirements. Any two neighbourhoods are different in terms
of location, area, focus group, facilities etc. Even in the same city they will receive
different responses.
So, for a country like India, where a lot of diversity is easily identifiable,
neighbourhoods and greenery within them ask for diverse concerns or requirements when
they search for a desired balance. To achieve this goal, identification of certain parameters
is required so that the planners or estate managers in campuses can assess their state of
development. In India, it is the lack of quantitative data on the greenery condition in order
to maintain or improve the condition. The greenery condition means the greenery

2
 Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2013
Infrastructure

parameters such as the area, the type, age and density of the greenery etc. The greenery
database in neighbourhoods is usually collected from the archive of the landuse drawings;
landuse plans do not represent the real time green scenario mostly. Even to decide on
making a shift in greenery and other open spaces’ objective, scarcity of quality data is an
important issue.

3 Green Infrastructure
Green infrastructure (http://greeninfrastructure.net/content/definition-green-infrastructure )
is ‘strategically planned and managed networks of natural lands, working landscapes and
other open spaces that conserve ecosystem values and functions and provide associated
benefits to human populations. The foundation of green infrastructure networks are their
natural elements – woodlands, wetlands, rivers, grasslands – that work together as a whole
to sustain ecological values and functions. Healthy functioning natural or restored
ecological systems are essential to ensure the availability of the network’s ecological
services’.
Natural England’s (http://www.urbanspaces.eu/files/ Green Infrastructure Guidance.
pdf) definition of green infrastructure is ‘Green Infrastructure is a strategically planned
and delivered network comprising the broadest range of high quality green spaces and
other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional
resource capable of delivering those ecological services and quality of life benefits
required by the communities it serves and needed to underpin sustainability. Its design and
management should also respect and enhance the character and distinctiveness of an area
with regard to habitats and landscape types.
Green Infrastructure includes established green spaces and new sites and should
thread through and surround the built environment and connect the urban area to its wider
rural hinterland. Consequently it needs to be delivered at all spatial scales from sub-
regional to local neighbourhood levels, accommodating both accessible natural green
spaces within local communities and often much larger sites in the urban fringe and wider
countryside.’
Green Infrastructures (GI) can be categorized in several systems with set of functions
under each of them.
1. Parks and Gardens – urban parks, Country and Regional Parks, formal gardens
2. Amenity Green space – informal recreation spaces, housing greenspaces, domestic
gardens, village greens, urban commons, other incidental space, green roofs
3. Natural and semi-natural urban green spaces – woodland and scrub, grassland (e.g.
downland and meadow), heath or moor, wetlands, open and running water,
wastelands and disturbed ground), bare rock habitats (e.g. cliffs and quarries)
4. Green corridors – rivers and canals including their banks, road and rail corridors,
cycling routes, pedestrian paths, and rights of way
5. Other – allotments, community gardens, city farms, cemeteries and churchyards.
Policies and strategies for development and implementation of these GI are evolving with
time to accommodate citizens’ aspirations. Different physical elements are vehicle for GI
like rail transit, urban forestry, water bodies etc. They bring benefits to urban environment
and thus offer better urban experience. But there are certain issues which require redressal
from various urban authorities; e.g. multiple approval authorities, affordability of users,

3
CESB13 Prague
Infrastructure

short-term solution provisions which invite/trigger other problems in longer time frame,
maintaining standard of facilities and quality etc.
To assess need for GI can start within a block or a neighbourhood or in the entire
city. Lansuse/landcover data would be extremely useful for the same. Efficient handling
of data allows developing an evaluation framework or tool to plan and act accordingly to
create sustainable campus environment. Balance between built spaces and green and other
open area is the crux of it. Geographical Information System (GIS), Leaf Area Index
(LAI), are components loosely identified which can help to develop a Greenery Evaluation
Framework (GEF) for neighbourhoods. Biotope Factor (BF), Green Plot Ratio (GnPR) are
some models developed in search for the need for GI.

4 Conclusion
The Greenery Evaluation Framework (GEF) for neighbourhoods would depend on micro-
climate data. Once a GEF is in place, it will facilitate in identifying requirement of type,
quantity and quality of green infrastructure which is area-specific and dynamic.

Bibliography
[1] Foy D., & Rogers J., Efficiency in cities: a preliminary assessment of Potential;
Living Cities Report, 2008.
[2] Fuller, R. A. and Gaston, K. J.; The scaling of green space coverage in European
cities; Biology Letters 5(3): 352–355, 2009.
[3] Kuchelmeister, G., Urban Forestry: Present Situation and Prospects in the Asia and
Pacific region, FAO Working Paper No: APFSOS/WP/44, FAO, Rome; 1998.
[4] Mukherjee, M.; Climatic Resiliency for Indian Cities, 2nd India Disaster Management
Congress, NIDM, Govt of India, Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi, 4–6 Nov, 2009.
[5] Revi A., Climate change risk: An adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities;
Environment and Urbanization, 20(1): 207–229, 2008.
[6] Robinson, J., Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable
development, Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384, 2004.
[7] Singh, V.S., Pandey, D. N. & Chaudhry, P., Urban forests and open green spaces:
lessons for Jaipur, Rajasthan, India; RSPCB Occasional Paper No. 1/2010, 2010.
[8] Sukhdev, P., Foreword notes in “Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite
planet” by Jackson, T., Earthscan, 2009.
[9] Summer, J. (Ed.), Asian Green City Index, 2011; Economist Intelligence Unit,
Sponsored by Seimens A G.
[10] Wang, X.J., Analysis of problems in urban green space system planning in China;
Journal of Forestry Research 20(1): 79–82, 2009.
[11] Wong, N. H. & Steve, K. J.; An Assessment Method for Existing Greenery Conditions
in a University Campus, Architectural Science Review, 51:3, 212–222; 2008.