Hlurb - Clup Guidebook Vol 4

Page 1
Reviewer for the 2015 EnP Board Exam
Prepared by Cid Jacobo (encoded as is from personal handwritten notes)
+ REMINDER: This reviewer is neither comprehensive nor complete +
Recommended Must Reads
Readings by Sir Ernesto M. Serote (EnP Pack/Manuals/Local Planning Manuals)

Rationalized Local Planning System
DILG’s CDP Preparation Guide

Property, Patrimony and Territory – Foundations of Land Use Planning in the Philippines
HLURB CLUP Guide Books (EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides)
2013 eCLUP Guidebook Vol. 1, 2, 3
Important Laws (EnP Pack/Laws)
1987 Constitution
RA 7160 “Local Government Code “
RA 7586 “National Integrated Protected Areas System Act of 1992” and IRR
RA 10587 “Environmental Planning Act of 2013”
Plans and Frameworks (EnP Pack/Laws/National Plans and Frameworks)
National Framework for Physical Planning 2001-2030
Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2011-20
Kevin Lynch (EnP Pack/References and Readings/Classic Readings/Kevin Lynch)
The Image of the City (Chapter III)

* If you must print, please use scratch paper or print back to back.
Page 2
 Planning Definitions
Systematic process determining means
Making an orderly sequence of actions to achieve of establishing and procedures to
stated goals ends and achieve that end
environme known as settlements planning, refers to

 Environmental Planning nt” urban and the multi-disciplinary art and
Definition regional science of analysing, specifying,
RA 10587 Planning, clarifying, harmonizing,
PD 1308 Section 2 (a) Section 4 city managing, and regulating the
(a) Planning, use and development of land
“…refers to activities connected town and and water resources, in relation
with the management and “Environm country to their environs, for the
development of land, as well as ental planning, sustainable development of
the preservation, conservation Planning, and/or sustainable communities and
and management of the human also human ecosystems”
Service y Steward of the people, er / As
 Planning Past and Planni s Environment not for Visiona
Present ng as a Plan ry
functio Regula Planning and the 3 Key has to
- Product-oriented n of tor and Actors be (Private
Process-oriented the Facilita State socially consulta
Agency-led State tor of (Government/Polity) accepta nt,
Community-based creates/p
the Planning is conflictive, ble
romotes
To Market therefore political
own
Top-down Bottom- safegu Roles
plan)
up ard the Arbiter Power is necessary to of a
-
public between carry out plans Planne
Compartmental- interest Conten r
ding As
Administrative What is feasible
Social Mediat
Integrated- Trans- To politically instead of As
Groups or/ As
border promot technically efficient or Regulat
Facilitat
e the effective or / As
Social or
Attributes of Planning general Policy
Engine
Process welfare Market Advise
er (Reconci
Science and Art (Business/Economy) r les
(direct
(quantifiable, 4 Basic
human conflicti
subjective) Roles of
behavio Without Planning, land (Imple ng
the would be apportioned
ur) ments interests
State
Multi-disciplinary between competing gov’t and
(Dear &
Comprehensive Clark * Land uses by price rules groups)
Dynamic 1981) Admin mechanism and As
istrator standar Advoca
Continuous/Iterative/C Suppli of Civil Society (Citizen ds) te / As
yclic er of Nation groups/Culture) Educato
Participatory Goods al As r
Time-bound and Territor Participation; plan with Design
(Advances the civic agenda of general public)
* If must print, please use back back.
you scratch paper or print to
Page 3
 Scope and Practice of EnP (PD 1308)  General Welfare Goals (RA 7160 Sec. 16)
“…professional services in the form of - Preservation and enrichment of culture

technical consultation, plan preparation, - Promote health and safety
and /or implementation involving:” - Enhance right to a balanced ecology
(a) Community, town, city, or region - Development of appropriate and self-

development reliant scientific /technological
(b)Development of a site for a particular capabilities
need (housing, institutions, etc.) - Improve public morals

including creating spatial - Enhance economic prosperity and
arrangements of buildings, utilities social justice
(c) Land Use /zoning plans for - Promote full employment

management, development, - Maintain Peace and Order
preservation of environment - Preserve comfort and Convenience
(d) Pre-Investment, feasibility studies
Important Definitions
manufacturing, Barangays with at
Philippine Definition of Urban recreational\ least 1,000
inhabitants,
NSO definition operational, not conceptual. Old At least three (3) of meetings /
definition: the following: conditions,
occupations are
Cities and municipalities in their entirety with Town hall, church predominantly
population density of 1,000 persons/square or chapel (at least 1 non-fishing
kilometre service/month)
Urban Varies per
Poblaciones or city/municipality central districts Public plaza, park country No
have a population density of or cemetery commonly-agreed
international
persons/square kilometre Market / trading definition.
place (at least 1
Poblaciones or central districts regardless of activity/month) (New - NSCB
population size with: Board Reso No. 9,
Public building s 2003)
Street pattern – parallel or right angles (school, hospital,
etc.) If a barangay has a
At least six (6) establishments – commercial,
population size of 5,000 or more, then a the barangay hall, classified as urban
barangay is considered urban, or then a barangay is and all highly
considered urban. urbanized cities
If a barangay has at least one establishment would be subjected
with a minimum of 100 employees, a barangay Furthermore, all to the urban-rural
is considered urban, or barangays in the criteria in order to
National Capital determine its
If a barangay has 5 or more establishments with Region are urban-rural
a minimum of 10 employees, and 5 or more automatically classification.
facilities within the two-kilometer radius from
paper or print
* If you must print, please use scratch back to back.
Page 4
g r
“U
C
i
t
y
”
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
b
y
c
h
a
r
t
e
r
o
r
l
e
bc r
a
L
n
iU
z
a
t
i
o
n
h
o
w
a
n
a
r
e
a
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
s
a
n
u
r
b
a
n
c
h
a
r
a
ba
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
o
f
C
i
t
i
e
s
9 la
HR e
y P
A
d AA
rG g
aA e
u s
T
l )
iR
c
P T
“
C o
iG w
v n
iF
C
l g
iT r
z e
aR w
t
C
i a
o r
n o
u
T n
h d
e
o c
r a
y t
h
( e
K d
a r
r a
l l
,
W
i a
t b
t b
f e
o y
g ,
e
l m
o
1 n
m
s da
e u
I
r s
c t
h r
a i
n a
t l
c r
l e
a v
s o
s l
. u
t
C i
i o
t n
i ;
e
s l
o
a c
s a
t
c e
o d
m
mn
e e
r a
c r
i
a c
l o
a
n l
o
d f
e i
s e
l
d
I s
n
d
u M
y ah
( s
.
-
- m
 e
Et
Par
o
o
s-
-
t
-c
Ii
n
-
df
u*
sw
t I
f
r
i
y
ao
l u
Cm
i u
t s
yt

p
r
S
i
on
c t
i ,
o
- p
Cl
ue
l a
s
t
e
u
r u
as
l e
Ts
hc
er
oa
t
r
c
Page 5
Planning Approaches
Long process, Planning
Master Plan / allows for
Blueprint participation Communicativ
‘Top-down’; dominant e Planning
vision of authority Mixed
Physical planning and Scanning – Frankfurt
design-oriented Amitai Etzioni School of
“Successive Social Critical
Systems Planning limited Theory
“Cybernetics” – comparisons”
Norbert Wiener Jürgen
- Habermas –
Planning like a ‘transactive’
computer that utilizes Strategic (To and fro)
information / feedback selection of
in an iterative, goals, loose Group interest
framework determined
cyclical fashion through
Advocacy or dialogue
Brian McLoughlin – Activist
Cyclical Process Planning Participatory
George Chadwick – Planning
Systems Approach
Applying
Allan Wilson – Linear Actual
explicit
Planning
principles of involvement of
social justice citizenry in
Rational –
planning
Comprehensive /
Planners
Synoptic
should Not mere
Patrick Geddes (Survey
advocate for consultation;
– Analysis – Plan)
disenfranchise plan with
All sectors, aspects –
d people, not for
overwhelming data
people
Pluralism in
n guiding overall theory
Incremental Decisio mutual or general principle –
Planning / n- adjustm actions become un-
“Disjointed making ent” - integrated
Incrementali is a Negotia
sm” successi tion and Deals with realities of
“the science on of political delays, scarce
of muddling approxi compro resources, insufficient
through” – mations mise information
Charles ;
Lindblom “partisa No [See: EnP Pack/References
and (58,000 Town, environment; road,
Readings/Classic
pax) Country
Readings/Planni
ng Approaches]
surroun , Town- Country: vice-versa
ded by Country - In concentric
Urban rings, towns grow by
Planning - “Three greenbe “cellular addition”
Models Magnet lts/farm
s”; land. [See: EnP Pack/References
and Readings/Classic
 Garden Linked
Readings]
City Garden by rail,
Cities
(Ebenezer * If you must print,
(30,000 - City: please use scratch paper
Howard)
pax) jobs but or print back to back.
-
separate poor
Central City
d by
Page 6
Urban Planning Models
City Beautiful Movement
Emphasis on aesthetics in urban design and planning: monumentality (drama), exuberance,

cohesiveness, grandeur, symmetry
Public works designed with classical facades – beauty stood supreme

Criticized for little concern for economic growth, zoning, housing, etc.
destructive
 Radiant City (Le Corbusier) Brasilia, Brazil
(1957) (Radiant City Combining
influenced) activities key to
Decongest by increasing density at core success
Authoritarian,
Uniform 60-storey apartment-towers with large inflexible, Design good for
open spaces in between meant for 3 million simplistic temporary living,
people not permanent
Standardization residence
Influenced CBD Designs inhuman, socially-
- Bounded d by City Functional Movement
by arterial homes,
streets bordered
 by - City Beautiful/Garden City =
New Towns Movement interconne - Internal urban design
cted street  Linear City
- Open system
- Skyscraper City = over - Focus on function over form,
green discourag
congestion, design
spaces es
- “Neighbourhood Unit”- low- (Don Arturo Soria y Mata)
10% of
rise, total area automobil
aesthetics
e roads.
Garden City = “better - Linear utility lines as basis of
Rough
communities” - Shops layout
Philippine
pedestrian-oriented residential around
through-
quarter. circumfere - Land Use Zoning over master
traffic
nce and planning
- Superblocks (Henry Wright) / - May run parallel to a river;
equivalent
6,000 pax - city
:
“Superblo subdivisio
Neighbourhood Clusters - Zoning as part of State police
ck” – n
(Clarence power: US
island of
- Schools, institutions around would grow longer, not wider
greens,
centre junctions
Supreme Court (1926) Village of
Perry) around green spaces  Euclid
surrounde
which are - 5 parallel sectors: railways,
residential agricultur
vs. Amber Reality /institutio al zone * If you must print, please use
production zone, greenbelt, nal zone, scratch paper or print back to
back.
- Excessive zoning = sterility
homogeneity,
Page 7
Urban Planning Models (cont)
City Efficient Movement
Rationalize urban planning in relation to decentralized economic production; transport planning
“Ekistics” – science of human settlements integrates economics, physical design
New Urbanism / Neo-Traditionalism
- Reviving “lost art of place-making”  Urban Renewal (US Federal Program)
- Opposes suburbs; rebuilding inner - Redevelop outworn, physically

city neighbourhoods around deteriorated areas
traditions, core values- Tax increment financing – urban renewal
- Fostering informal human interaction bonds paid by future tax revenues

revitalizes community; - Gentrification – up-scaling blighted areas
pedestrianization, mixed-use to attract business, elite occupants.
Tends to ‘yuppification’, social

 Environmental Planning exclusion
- Ecology and environmental constraints
- Eco – Anarchism: Anti-big city return Slum demolitions gave rise to advocacy
to micro identities as spatial strategy planning
- Exurb (extra-urban); Suburbanization
Great Thinkers
planner
Hippodamus of Miletus (407 B.C.) Henry Wright
(1878-1936) Father of Regional
“Father of Town Planning” in Europe. Lawyer- Planning
architect; emphasized geometric designs Introduced
“superblock” “Survey – Analysis
Charles – Edouard Jeanneret concept in US “New – Plan”. Coined
Town” terms “city-region”,
(1887- 1965) “Le Corbusier” “Conurbation”.
Sir Patrick Geddes “Folk Work Place”
Swiss-French Architect-planner, focused on (1854-1932) framework
architectural style.
Scottish biologist, Thomas Adams
Criticized for “planning paradox” sociologist, city Father of Urban
Planning in Canada Daniel Hudson
Burnham (1846- Frank Lloyd
Formed Town Planning Institute of Canada 1912) Wright (1867-1975)
(1919)
Father of American “Broadacre City”
Jane Jacobs (1916-2006) City Planning; urban
Prophet of City decentralization;
Diversity in geographic concentration spurs Beautiful low-density, car-
urban growth; mixed-use neighbourhoods Movement. Chicago oriented, 1 acre per
make vibrant urban communities Plan (1909) family
paper or print
* If you must print, please use scratch back to back.
Page 8
Clarence S. Stein (1882-1975) Sir Leslie Patrick Abercrombie
Co-founded Regional Planning Association (1879-1957) Abercrombie Plan: London re-

of America (1923) with H. Wright and L. planning through dispersal of 1.25M people to
Mumford new towns, rural areas
Lewis Mumford (1895-1990) Ian L. McHarg (1920-2001)
Father of Historical Sociological Approach First modern environmental planner;

to Planning pioneered environmental impact
statements, GIS use
Planning as multi-disciplinary; should
emphasize organic relationship between “form…must also respect the natural
people and living spaces environment…”
Ecological planning through map overlay

Philadelphia: park, - French Architect, engineer, city
rectangular  planner
Pierre Charles
Notable Names L’Enfant (1784- neighbourhood park per quadrant -
1825) Washington D.C. Plan (1791),
 William Penn / forerunner of City Beautiful
Thomas Holme grid system, central
- Designed Baron Georges Eugene Haussmann
long wide forester, conservationist, Athens
(1809-1891) boulevards, regional planner Designed
French pocket Islamabad Robert
Architect- parks “Father of the Appalachian (1959) Moses
theorist, Trail” (1924-1968)
redesigned Benton Became
Paris with MacKaye Dr. Konstantinos A. Dioxiadis Town Park
circular (1879-1975) Planning Commission
plazas, (1913-1975) “Ekistics”, Chief of er, head of
American “Ecumenopolis”. Greater New York
City Works) Vaux on URP Planning”
Planning
Commissio Frederick Tony Garnier (1869-1948) Quantitativ Obama’s
n. Law e, statistical idol during
th
Responsible Olmstead Forerunner of Avant garde 20 tools to his
for building Sr. (1822- century French architects study social community
virtually 1903) phenomeno developme
every “Conservati Proposed “Une Cite n nt days
parkway, on and Industrielle” – linear industrial
expressway, Parks City Paul Public
public Davidof
Movement” interest is
housing in Dr. Francis Stuart Chapin Jr. (1965) political,
NY Region Designed (1888-1974) not
($27 Billion Central Park Father of scientific
in Public with Calvert First to write comprehensive book “Advocacy
* If you print, please use scratch
must paper or print back to back.
1. Invasion: activity / social group enters area
2. Succession: former use/social group replaced
3. Segregation: sorting out of population groups according to conscious preference, bias,
prejudice
4. Assimilation / Accommodation: diverse groups find peaceful co-existence
Page 9
Rachel Louise Carson
American biologist, “eco-feminist” who sparked environmental movement in US thru ‘Silent

Spring’ (1962)
Advocacies led to US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) system
[See: EnP Pack/References and Readings/Classic Readings]
Theories of Urban Growth
 Human Ecology (Chicago School of Urban Sociology) – Robert Park
5. Concentration: distribution of activities, population and manner which they have focused on
city centre
6. Decentralization: locating away from central city

7. Filtering: Neighbourhood declines
8. Survival of the fittest: powerful groups acquire best locations who can maximize, pay cost
Lure of “bright of agri
Forces shaping a City lights” inputs/outputs
Centripetal (Pull forces of a city)
Clustering of certain functions Centrifugal
Push Forces (Rural (Push forces
Maximum accessibility to city) from city)
Wars and civil strife Increasing bid
Proximity to range of entertainment rent
Prestige of central address Natural calamities Congestion
Huge Urban-Rural wage differentials Labor surplus due Restrictions on

Better quality urban services/facilities to farm city centre
mechanization developments
Possibility of subsidized goods/services
Price manipulation Lack of Space
4. natural serves as node to others
Stages of Urban Growth (Stage Regional resource, 2.
of…) Metropolis tourism Export complex
1. 5.
Export Specialization - - National / International
Metropolis Virtuosity National local service sector puberty
3. eminence
- Economic in Import substitution
broadens to other facets of focus maturation specializ
6. ed skill If you must print, please use scratch
Technical / Professional - paper or print back to back.
Page 10
Theories of Urban Growth / Land Use
 Concentric Ring Theory (1925)

Ernest W. Burgess (American Sociologist)
- Hypothetical land use pattern
-Human Ecology
Accessibility, rent and densities decrease with distance from city centre; commercial agents that can
afford high land values will concentrate at centre
Outward pressure as those with higher income pursue better environment
Downtown / CBD
Industries / Transition Area

III. Working Class Area
IV. Residential Area
V. Suburban Area
Concentric Zones
Zone I – CBD. Only scattered residences remain
Zone II – Zone in Transition. Early suburban fringe being taken over by industry, hence run-
down, declining residential
Zone III – Independent Working Men’s Homes. Respectable working class with families that escaped
Zone II but need cheap housing close to work places. Zone focused on factories
Zone IV – Better Residences. Middle-class private housing / good apartments
Zone V- Commuter Belt. Suburban dormitory, single-family dwellings

Possible additional zones – Agricultural district, Hinterland
Expansion driven by economic ‘trade-off’, creates land-use pattern (accessibility and cost)
Critics: overemphasized residential patters; neglected factors like physical features, industrial
use, effects of radial routes.
Inverse Concentric Model
Observed mostly in Less Developed Countries

Opposite of Burgess’ model; poor moving away from city centre, rich retains control
Social status declines with increasing distance from the centre
Pattern exists in primarily administrative cities
Lack of adequate, dependable transport system restricts elite close to work at city centre
City functions (administrative, religious, cultural) controlled by elite, concentrated at city centre
If you must print, please use scratch paper or print back to back.
Page 11
Theories of Urban Growth / Land Use (cont.)


Sector or Radial Model (1939)
Homer Hoyt
-
High-rent districts shape city land use.
Expands according to four (4) factors:
Established trade routes to high-rent nucleus
Towards high ground / along waterfronts
Route of fastest transportation

Towards open space
Residential grow in wedge-shape

Low – income housing near industry, railroads
Criticisms
Few zones are socio-economically homogenous

Transport routes today surrounded by low-rent
 Multiple Nuclei Model (1945) Chancey Harris / Harry Ullman
Related from US gridiron road patterns
Nuclei acts as growth centres for particular land uses (industry, retail, etc.) that expand and
merge to form single urban area
Geographic Principles:
Certain activities need highly specialized facilities (transportation; accessibility)
Certain activities cluster for profit from mutual association (agglomeration)
Certain activities repel each other
Certain activities don’t profit from high-rent of most desirable locations
Criticisms: Economic bias; doesn’t account for cultural influences

* If you must print, please
use scratch
Page 12
Other Theories of Urban Growth / Land Use

functions de-
Hybrid Model (Walter Isard concentrated
1955) away from
historical central
Combines strengths of cities
Concentric, Sector, Zonal
models Fuentes on
Historical
Urban land use is overlay of Evolution of LA
different transportation cities
effects; some oriented along
transportation effects; some Establishment of
border open
oriented along transport axis,
opportunities of
some in nuclei to reach scale CBD – (original
commerce,
and agglomeration economies colonial city);
services
Spine – CBD
Concentric Zone extension down
Surge of
Modification major blvd.
maquiladoras
(Peter Mann 1965)
(industry) Zone of Maturity
Typical British town model
reorganize – Gradually
urban structure, improved self-
Main feature: commuter
competes with built housing
village separated
commerce/servi
ces Zone of Accretion
Considers prevailing wind – Transition zone,
from west; best residential modest housing
Transition from
area upwind from industrial
mono-centric to
Zone of
polycentric city
Galactic City (Peirce F. Lewis) Peripheral
result of leapfrog Squatter
 Latin settlements
development
American
Edge cities form in suburbs
Model Commercial
‘Doughnut shape’, low- spine
density centre, activity along surrounded by
ring roads resemble galaxy elite residential
sector
‘Edge Cities’ (Joel Garreau
1991) Inner-city zone
of maturity –
Fringe cities on alternate area of upward
CBDs centered on suburban mobility
malls, office/techno parks
Zone of
‘more jobs than bedrooms’; peripheral
squatter settlements vegetation for housing
fuel, materials
Most recent migrants ‘Favela’ =
‘Periferia’= recent, poor
Fringe contrasts with affluent older, more quality informal
North American suburbs permanent in housing
informal
Refugee camp-like; bare of
please use paper or back.
* If you must print, scratch print back to
Page 13
Urban Form Stereotypes (Kevin Lynch)

image of city network
 Dispersed Sheet continuous
Developments grid; no road
spread evenly hierarchy,
over wide major nodal
tract; low points or
densities, terminals
substantial
open land in Public service
reserve provision is
- No Vivid or memorable expensive
Transport
zero Major centre provides
 Galaxy of densit speciali specialized services,
Settlements - y ze nodes act as external
Developments - linkage, captive market,
clustered into Cluster Related support
relatively s equal :
in Centric Radial and
import and Circumferential
small units, ance Nodal
separated by a but Form Nodes connected by
zone of low or can radial/circumferential
roads
con h s discomfort due to i th
 Core City tin den noise m e
uo sity a w
us acti Housing limited g ho
bod vitieto high-rise or e le
Concentrates y s; compact dwelling f to
development incr o w
into one Hig ease Strong visual
r n
( earip R g no single
 Urban Li r/ development) i dominant
Star n st  The n –center
n hy centers
t distributed
c salong main
o eradials.
r cVery strong L
e ovisual
nimage
w d
Domina i a
t r
(Rational
ized
Local
Planning
System/
Chapter
5/ Table
5.1)
If you
must
print,
please
use
scratch
paper or
print
back to
back.
Page 14
Theories of Spatial Planning
 Spatial Equilibrium
Transportation
European market economy just before / after Uniform cost proportional
Industrial Revolution; cities structured in a topography, to distance,
spatially balanced hierarchical system climate, crop invariant to
prices and yields direction
Goods, services distributed evenly in
systematic pattern dominated by central Markets Farmers and
places relatively businessmen are
isolated from profit-
City is centralization, convergence of central other
maximizers;
places
perfect free
‘Friction of market
Problematic assumptions; can’t be applied Distance’ –
universally
competition
diminishe centre significantly of
 Agricultural Land Rent s with from model; productivity,
Theory (1842, 1896) distance - Johann not concentric, considers
from Heinrich follows other values
market Von natural
Land nearest to market in centre Thünen features No sole
greatest demand due to low (1783-1850) isolated
transport cost – highest rent, Concentric Farmers are centre, there
value rings Most actual ‘satisficers’ – are
around agri land content with secondary
Production intensity, land use market use deviates a certain level markets
higher gradien es city is commerci (ex. away
transp ts, rent mono- al space traffic from
ort with centric; (retail, congesti city
Urban Bid Rent Theory and highest only offices)
on) centres;
(1964) operat gradien applies to ex.
t would cities Disecono Urban
ing Suburba
Land value is maximum costs prevail with mies of land
nization,
at city centre; more urbanizatvalue at
strong growth
accessible to centre has Differe ion core
urban of
higher value, declining nt land moves decrease
core / multiple
farther away from uses Willia manufact s as
CBD (e.g. nodes
transport, employment would m uring
Zurich) populati
have Alonso from on
Rent diminishes to differe Applies to urban moves
offset lower revenue, nt rent Assum centres
* If must please scratch print back.
you print, use paper or back to
Page 15
Theories of Spatial Planning (cont)
 Central Place Theory - Walter Christaller (1893 – 1969)

purchased
Village/town/city providing common location Consumers
for l exchange of goods and services Useful but expected to
imperfect model patronize nearest
‘Hinterland’ = market area served by central for importance of centres
place recognizing local
city’s role in Resource-base as
Hierarchy of Settlements as population regional economy central place, not
increases; market range increases, higher order consumer market
of services Theory assumes
isotropic plain, Real World
Systematic pattern of central places evenly spread, ignores variable deviations:
surrounded by hexagonally shaped market areas topography Historical
circumstance;
High ranked central place offers all goods and Assumes uniform Government
services of next lower ranked place + one or two transportation interference; Social
more costs, population stratification,
distribution, per- income differences
Low-order goods are expensive, frequently
capita demand
populatio competitio at market price
n to n from
High-order goods costly, support other Rank-Size Rule (1941) George
infrequently purchased; larger supply central Zipf (1902-1950)
population required to support places)
(e.g. hospital, mall) Market Pn = P1
Range: Range of Ex. If Population of largest town =
distance Goods andX,
willing to Services:
travel to average
obtain maximum then population of 2nd largest town
Range and Threshold of Goods
goods/ser distance = X/2
and Services (1958) – BJL Berry
vices willing to
and Garrison
(Upper travel to
Threshold: minimum effective
level – purchase
demand, market needed,
q y s when there is Urban Conside not
n q= approx Primacy rs only natural
expone imates service resource
Pn = population of nth nt unity In most countries largest (comme s
settlement P1 = population which city larger than rule rce, localizat
of largest settlement n = usuall Applie trade), ion
settlement rank
* If must print, please use back back.
you scratch paper or print to
- Urban Region – cities/towns and socio-economically linked/dependent commuter villages or
communities. Erroneously treated as homogenous; actually physical, socio-cultural mosaic,
heterogeneous “ecosystem
Page 16
 Region - sub-national territory with known scale (size) and extent (scope)
- Refers to a city or central place plus its - Based on natural/physical, economic/political

functionally integrated outlying territories. relationships between urban and rural.
Economic Linkages Infrastructure Linkages
- Extent of urban influence on non-urban - Transport nodes, utility trunks
areas; dependence on resources, (water, power supply)

production/consumption. - Areas performing sink-functions (e.g. landfills)
Functional Region - Geographical area with a certain functional coherence, interdependence of
parts, defined by criteria:
- Economic Region – bound by - Natural Region – interdependence and

economic linkages, interflows of connectedness of:
factors, materials, in/outputs. - Bio-region: life flows and species
Interlinked industrial clusters, - Eco-region: ecosystems and

districts, zones, ports communities
Formal Region Geographical area uniform and homogenous in terms of related criteria;
variability absent
- Political-Administrative Region - common political authority, administrative boundaries

(national, local), electoral constituency
Historical Region – common historical past
Virtual Region – network of functionally – related areas with high level of connectivity (ICT)
and economic inter-flows though not spatially proximate or contiguous.
(Ex. Network Economy – ICT enables firms to create dispersed economic networks)
History of Regional Planning Movement

Early influences from Garden City (UK) and New Towns (US) movements
US cities with ‘municipal planning commissions’ from 100 to 500 between 1920 – 1930
Regional Planning Association of America founded 1923-1925
“Survey” – published manifesto containing region concept; inter-disciplinary planning approach
Town and Country Planning Act of 1947 (UK)

Benton Mackaye published “The New Exploration: A Philosophy of Regional Planning”, 1928
Thomas Adams and Lewis Mumford debated multi-volume Regional Plan of New York, 1928-1932
Los Angeles County (1922), Appalachian Trail (1928), Tennessee Valley Authority (1933), Grand
Coulee Dam (1935), Colorado River-Hoover Dam (1936), St. Lawrence Seaway (1959), Delaware River
(1961), Miami (Ohio) Valley (1970); counties, river basins, dams, valleys
Regional Planning dovetailed with Transport Planning
(Penn-Jersey, 1954; Chicago-Detroit, 1954)
Page 17
Regional Planning
Cross-cutting, more encompassing concept, treats cities in relation to environs
Regional divergence – inherently unequal due to geography, natural resources, history, socio-
economics
Aspects of Regional Planning

regions vs.
Physical: area’s physical structures; land use, Focus of Regional economic
utilities, etc. Origin in control of town Planning polarization
development
Decentralization Inter-regional
Economic: economic structure of area, level of policies allocation /
prosperity, reduction of regional disparities Population redistribution of
distribution resources (regional
Social: Migration, equity, redistribution convergence)
Reduction of
Cultural: Ethnic identity, common identity economic Institutional
disparities among capacitation
Environmental: ecosystems, sustainability
Regional Planning Theories
induces linkages, center of ed, and Polarizati
Growth Pole Theory (Francis growth innovative a region; continuou on, spread
Perroux) in others , large s effects.
when it ‘growth
Spatial agglomeration of grows or Growth pole’ in Growth Has
related industries with a innovates Center a induceme growth
growing number of . (Jacques specific nt rate of
propulsive firms which R. place mechanis populatio
Characte
n or
induce growth in ristics: Boudeville that is ms;
employme
surrounding hinterland fast ) heteroge changes
nt greater
growth, neous, spread
over than
Propulsive firm/industry: strong Propulsive not
region: region
dominant economic unit that urban specializ
induce of activit Growt “econo , while Growth
- Both are set a of develo econo y; h pole mic Center is a
industries which pment mic is an space” “geographic space”
solv regio regio cent publ nt, areas are gr ine
Agglomeration e ns nal ers, ic concentrated in o str
economies make prob structpres expe specific growth wt ate
efficient way to lems Usef ures, cribe ndit points h gy
generate of ul to desig solut ures of
development depr unde nate ions of Transport Ph “co
esse rstan regio inve routes as ili nce
Spread effects help d pp ntr
d nal Less stme channels of
ated alter urba cente serv coun magnets
decentralization”; nate n rs e as ter
* If must , e scra paper or print
you print pleas use tch back to back.
Page 18
 Urban Development Theory (Albert Hirschmann) Center – Periphery Model

Growth “Chain of
Development starts in relative few dynamic necessarily an disequilibrium”
sectors / geographic location, then expected to unbalanced created by one firm
spread process to another
Down on in early s, inevitable from

Scarce resources can’t be effect stage of developme developed
invested everywhere; certain economic nt of areas
sectors selected for growth Cumulati growth, backward
potential, ability to induce ve then; areas
forward/backward linkage Causation because of
effects Theory “Trickle pulls in Gunnar
(1957) Down input Myrdal
Inevitable, gradual, uniform Effect”: demand (Nobel
development through Trickle- Polarizati spontaneou Laureate)
inequa alone ed expand ic activity, increasing
Market forces create lities if demand ing demand and incomes,
economic disequilibrium, left Increas from econom
increase regional
deve pmen r, rich syste ng fel ect
spurring second lop t; beco ms t s
cycle men “Poo mes not “Backwash”: po
t/ r richer self- attention returns siti
Forces work in und beco ” equilito core region ve
circular, cumulative erde mes brati eff
process to reinforce velo pooreSocial “Spread effects”:
sh ital ded Reduced w te labor force in
circ attra gro investment, jobs o toperiphery decre
cted wth in periphery r c ased attraction
uit
to in smaller local k e
s: cent peri market, e n
er pherpurchasing r te
Cap L y power,
ital ack s r * If you must
Serv decline in local
/ m print, please use
of ices/ services
Ba inve inve i a scratch paper or
Infr
ck stm stme g gi print back to
astr Migration/Empl
ent: nt, r n back.
wa uctu oyment: Young
Cap retar re: a g
Page 19
Linkages (Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 3/Local Economy/(c))
Backward linkage (suppliers) Firm Forward linkage (downstream, customers) Example:

Sugar Farm Sugar mill soft drinks manufacturer
Vertical: Firms produce components of a final output (ex. Parts of a car)
Horizontal: Firms produce components of product that are complementary in use (furniture)
Diagonal: Service cuts across different types of firms (security, insurance)
Residentiary: services for employees, staff provided by firms/households (housing, catering)
Theories of Industrial Location

declining average
Least Cost Approach (Alfred Weber 1909) Optimum location is cost of firms
function of aggregate resulting from
Focus on reducing cost of production through economic geographic
transportation; best location = lowest transport concentration:
cost Profit Developing industry-
Maximization specific labor pool
Transport cost = assembling raw materials + Approach
(Isard & Green Hut) Infrastructure
distribution
(transportation,
Best location = least housing)
Least Cost Variant by Edgar Hoover (1948)
Clustering of
cost + revenue
sub/contractors
Considers competition, multiple markets, location
High-order services
institutional factors like local taxes
attracts low-order
Thus focuses computation on input side Considers locational
ones
interdependence
Behavioral Theory of Industrial Location between firms, Theory of
assuming Competitive Firm
(Ruth Gasson & Allan Richard Pred) behavioral factors (Michael Porter)
neglected Strategy is about
Locational decisions deviate from ideal; based structure and
on intuition of managers, operative values Theory of rivalry
Manufacturing
‘Psychic income’: self-satisfaction, industrial Production (David Smith)
Not size of market
peace, cooperation with community Revision of Least
but quality of
Cost Approach
demand
Behavioral considerations of space, time, human
behavioral variables Manufacturing firms
High importance of
benefit from
innovation playing
Market Area Analysis (August Losch 1940) Localization of
a critical role
Economies –
demand – where there is high  of Scale through
profits Economies achieved - Assumes uniform population
densities interdepend
- ence * If you must print, please use
Specialized Machinery - Output scratch paper or print back to
with constant tastes, no Spread of back.
locational Fixed Costs
- Fixed Division of Labor, over Greater
Page 20
RA 7160 “Local Government Code of 1991” (Article X. 1987 Constitution)
Some Important Provisions related to Local Planning Structure and Processes
Section 2. Declaration of Policy: “subdivisions of the State shall enjoy genuine and meaningful
local autonomy… fullest development as self-reliant communities… effective partners in the
attainment of national goals.”
Section 6. Authority to Create Local Government Units
Either by law enacted by Congress (province, city, municipality, other political subdivision), or
ordinance by Sangguniang Panlalawigan/Panglungsod (barangays)
Section 15. Political and Corporate Nature of Local Government Units
Section 16. General Welfare
Section 18. Power to Generate and Apply Resources: taxes, fees for development
Section 19. Eminent Domain: through an ordinance, for public use/welfare, upon payment of
just compensation, after a valid offer has been rejected
Section 20. Reclassification of Lands
A city/municipality through an ordinance can authorize reclassification of Agriculture lands if:

Land ceases to be economically feasible and sound for agri purposes
Land shall have substantially greater economic value for residential, commercial, or industrial
purposes – limited to the following percentages:
15% | Highly Urbanized and Independent Component Cities
st rd
10% | Component cities, 1 -3 class municipalities
5% | 4th – 6th class municipalities
Agri lands under CARP/CARL (RA 6657) not affected
LGU shall prepare Comprehensive Land Use plans enacted through zoning ordinance.
Section 25. National Supervision over LGUs: by the President - directly over Provinces, HUCs,
and Independent Component Cities; through Province for municipalities and component cities;
through Cities and municipalities for Barangays.
Section 26. Duty of National Government Agencies in the Maintenance of Ecological Balance:
to coordinate with LGUs regarding envi impact of projects/programs
Section 27. Prior Consultations Required: No project/programs implemented unless
consultations are complied with and approved by the Sanggunian
Section 48. Local Legislative Power / Section 49. Presiding Officer
- Sanggunian Panlalawigan – Vice Governor - Sangguniang Bayan – Municipal Mayor

- Sangguniang Panlungsod – City Vice Mayor - Sangguniang Barangay
Barangay – Punong
approved 107. Functions of Local
Section 106. Local Development by the Composit Development Councils
Councils: Each LGU shall have aSanggunia ion /
comprehensive multi-sectoral n Section * If you must print, please use
development plan initiated by 108. scratch paper or print back to back.
its development council, Section
Page 21
Section 111. Executive Committee / Section. 112 Sectoral or Functional Committee Section 113.
Secretariat (see chart in next pages)
Section 114. Relation of LDC to the Sanggunian and the Regional Development Council:
Policies, programs, projects submitted to the Sanggunian. Approved plans may be integrated
with development plans of next higher LDC.
(b) Approved plans of Provinces, HUCs, and ICCs shall be submitted to the Regional DC,
integrated into Regional Development Plan for submission to NEDA
Section 118. Jurisdictional Responsibility for Settlement of Boundary Dispute

(a-c) LGUs in same city/municipality/province referred to Sanggunian of the ‘mother’ LGU
(d) Component city/Municipality/HUCs vs. HUCs referred jointly to respective Sanggunians
Section 119. Appeal. May elevate to Regional Trial Court with jurisdiction over area
Section 120. Local Initiative Defined: “legal process whereby the registered voters of an LGU
may directly propose, enact, or amend any ordinance.”
Section 126. Local Referendum Defined: “legal process whereby the registered voters of the
LGUs may approve, amend, or reject any ordinance enacted by the Sanggunian.”
Section 129. Power to Create Sources of Revenue: to levy taxes, fees, and charges
Section 132. Local Taxing Authority: exercised by the Sanggunian through an ordinance
Section 201. Appraisal of Real Property: at the current and fair market value
Section 215. Classes of Real Property for Assessment Purposes:
Residential, Agricultural, Commercial, Industrial, Mineral, Timberland, Special
Section 216. Special Classes of Real Property: hospitals, cultural, scientific purposes; owned by
local water districts and GOCCs rendering supply/distribution of water/electricity
Section 232. Power to Levy Real Property Tax: A Province / City / Municipality within
Metropolitan Manila area may levy an annual ad valorem tax on real property
Section 233. Rates of Levy: (a) not exceeding 1% assessed value for provinces;
(d) not exceeding 2% of assessed value for city / municipality within Metro Manila Area
Section 235. Additional Levy on Real Property for the Special Education Fund:
- Additional 1% on assessed value to exclusively accrue to the SEF

Section 236. Additional Ad Valorem Tax on Idle Lands: not exceeding 5% over basic tax
Section 237. Idle Lands, Coverage:
Agricultural lands, more than 1 hectare, ½ of which remain uncultivated / unimproved by

owner. Permanent or perennial crops with at least 50 trees/ha, grazing land not idle
Other lands in city/municipality more than 1,000 sqm, ½ of which remain unutilized/ unimproved.
Applies to residential lots in subdivisions regardless of area
40% of collections from third fiscal year

Each based on:
a) Population (50%) b) Land Area (25%)
c) Equal Sharing (25%)
Page 22
Section 271. Distribution of Proceeds: Basic real property tax, not including SEF/Idle lands
a)
Province
35% Province
40% Municipality
25% Barangay
where property is located

b)
Cities
70% City
15% All Barangays
15% Barangay
Distributed equally
c)
Municipality
35% Metro
30% Municipality
- 15% All Barangays
in Metro
Manila
- 15% Barangay
Manila
Authority

Section 284. Allotment of Internal Revenue Taxes: preceding current year
Section 285. Allocation to Local Government Units
- 23% Provinces
- 23% Cities
- 34% Municipalities
20% Barangays
“share of each Barangay with a population of not less than 100 inhabitants shall not be less than
P80,000 per annum chargeable against the 20% share of the Barangay from the IRA, and the
balance to be allocated according to following formula: Population (60%), Equal sharing (40%)
Section 287. Local Development Projects: LGU shall appropriate NO LESS than 20% of IRA
Section 290. Amount of share of Local Government Units: LGUs shall have 40% share of gross
collection derived by the national government from the preceding fiscal year from mining taxes,
royalties, forestry and fishery charges, and other income from its share in any co-production,
joint venture, or production sharing agreement in utilization and development of national wealth
in its area.
Section 450. Requisites for Creation (City) [As amended by RA 9009]
Municipality / Cluster of barangay to component city if at least:

Average annual income = P100,000,000 for last 2 consecutive years
Contiguous Territory = 100 sq. km |Inhabitants = 150,000
Section 451. Cities, Classified: Component or Highly Urbanized. Independent Component

Cities’ charters prohibit their voters for voting for provincial officials
Section 452. Highly Urbanized Cities: classified as if:
a) 200,000 Minimum Population b) P50,000,000 latest annual income b) Voters of HUCs don’t
vote for provincial officials
Section 453. Duty to declare Highly Urbanized Status: By the President within 30 days of
meeting minimum requirements
Read also Sections on LGU officials and their functions, responsibilities.
Page 23
 Components of the Local Planning Structure
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 1 Local Planning Structure)
 Local Planning and Development Model
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 2/2.1 General Planning and Development Model)
Page 24
 Local Planning Structure (Province, City/Municipality)
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 1 Local Planning Structure)
(RA 7160 Local Government Code/Sec. 106-114)
Composition of Provincial, City, and Municipal LDC, Execom, Secretariat
Local Chief Executive (Gov / Mayor)
LCEs of component LGUs (ex. mayors if province)
Sanggunian Appropriations Committee Chair

Congressman’s Representative
NGO representative (1/4 of council)
Local Chief Executive

Mayor’s Representative (province only)
Sanggunian Appropriations Committee Chair
President of the LGU liga ng mga barangay

NGO representative
Local Planning and Development Coordinator

(Any NGO, educational/research institution)
Page 25
 Barangay Development Council (BDC) Functions:
Punong Barangay
Members of Sangguniang Barangay
Congressman’s representative
NGO representatives (1/4 of council)

BDC ExeCom
Punong Barangay, Sangguniang Barangay representative, NGO representative
Secretariat: Barangay Secretary, assisted by LPDC
(RA 7160 Local Government Code/Sec. 107) (Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 1 Local Planning Structure)
Sector Concerns and Subsectors
 Social Development Sector

(General welfare goals 1, 2, 8)
-
Social Characteristics
- Social Justice: “a just distribution justly arrived at”
-
Quality of Life
- Access to social service
Sub-sectors (3
Population (size, growth, distribution)

Social services and status of well-being:
Health; Education, culture, recreation; Welfare; Housing; Protective Services - Gender Equity
Concerns
 Economic Development Sector

(General welfare goals 4, 6, 7)
- Full employment promotion
- Food self-sufficiency or security
Sub-sectors (4)
Primary Sector – Agricultural crops; Livestock; Fisheries (in-land, brackish, marine); Forestry
Secondary – Mining and Quarrying; Manufacturing; Construction; Electricity, water, gas, utilities
Tertiary – Wholesale & retail trade; Transport and Communications; Finance; Insurance and
related activities; Real Estate; Personal and Community services; Tourism
Informal Sector
 Environment and Natural Resources (General welfare goal 3)
- Conserve & co-manage natural resources - Review of EIAs; enforce conditionalities of ECCs
Mineral lands – surface); marine
Sub-sectors (7) metallic; non-
metallic Air Quality
Lands – Public Domain; Private, A&D; Ancestral
Domain Waste
management –
Forest lands – Protection; Production Water resources Solid; Liquid
– Freshwater waste; Toxic &
Parks, wildlife & other reservations (ground, hazardous
* If you scratch back.

must print, paper or
please use print back to
Page 26

Infrastructure Development Sector
(General welfare goal 2, 6, 9)
-
Preferred spatial strategy / urban form
- Upgrading quality of services, facilities
- Food self-sufficiency & production targets
and desired standards
-
Eliminating backlogs on social service
- Reducing vulnerability to envi risks and
provision
disasters
- Maintaining integrity of environment
Sub-sectors (3)
Economic Support – Irrigation systems; Power Generation; Roads; Bridges, Ports; Flood Control
and drainage; Telecommunications
Social Support – Hospitals; Schools; Waterworks and Sewerage; Public Socialized Housing;
Facilities for aged, infirm, disadvantaged
Public Administrative Support – Government buildings; Jails; Freedom Parks; Public Assembly areas
 Institutional Development Sector
- Structure and Functions of planning bodies

- Public participation in planning and
- Local Fiscal Management
governance
Sub-sectors (4)
-
Organization and Management
- LGU-NGO-People’s Organization
-
Fiscal Management
linkages
Legislative Output
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 1 Box 1//Chapter 6 /6.2 the Sectors and their Concerns)
Vision to Goals
Vision – LGU’s desired end state/scenario, described as if already attained

Goal – same but stated in infinitive form: “To do / be something”
(Workshops, technical/admin responsibility of LPDO)
Serves as: An End where all actions are directed
Criteria for evaluating strategies, approaches, and policies

A Standard against which success is measured
Components – Desired role of LGU: contribution to nation/region. “Outward-looking”

Desired state of LGU: as a desired human habitat. “Inward-looking”
“Vision Elements” - Using 5 Development sectors (Envi/Infra can be combined – “Built envi”)
Descriptors: Adjectives to describe vision elements (usually 3; ex. Empowered, healthy)
Success Indicators: “Ideal” condition per descriptor. Expressed in superlative/ max values
Vision Reality Gap Analysis: Success Indicator – assigned rating/current level of attainment
- Sample Matrix
Descriptor
Success Indicator
Current rating
Interpretation
- Healthy
0% Malnutrition rate
40%
Needs more effort
0 Maternal mortality
5
50% reduction
Page 27
Vision to Goals: using Problem – Solution Finding Analysis
Restate policy options in goal form:
“To + verb”
Simple Current Reality Scale
0 – Absolutely nothing
1-4 – Low attainment
6-9 – Short of full attainment
N – No Data
5 – Half achieved
10 – Goal attained
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 3 // Chapter 4 Goal Formulation Process)
Profiling and Analysis
 Socio-Economic Profile
 Ecological Profile (LPDO/C responsibility)
- Basic reference about aspects of locality
- source of data/information on LGU
- simple snapshot of area at a given point in time
- periodic capture of same data sets
- distribution of data attributes not consistent
- Data disaggregated to lowest level
- Cursory treatment of physical / envi sectors
- due recognition for bio-physical/ecological
- Contains 5 Dev’t Sectors, subsectors

Helps LGU determine:
Services needed by constituents

Resources available
Environmental Factors
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS) Transforming Data into Useful Information
Step 1: Indicators: Intermediate (input, output); Final (outcome, impact)

Index – combination of Indicators designed to measure overall condition of object
Indicators – standardized measures that ensure comparability across time /space

Statistics – Organized data, usually in the form of tables, require analysis/interpretation
Data – new information
Step 2: Construct Statistical Compendium (3-Dimensional Database)
Sectoral/Sub-sectoral: maintain 5 development sectors
Geographical / Spatial: reflect at least 3 levels of spatial scale
Temporal: show time-series data
Step 3: Problem – Solution Finding Analysis

Observed Conditions – Explanations (Causes) – Implications when unresolved – Policy Options
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 3 Building and Maintaining an Information Base for Local Planning)
Page 28
Comprehensive Development Plan
 Simplified Sectoral Planning Process
Process for Preparing CDP
Sectoral goals, objectives & targets: a.) Vision-reality gap analysis; b) Attainment level rating
Policies, programs, projects & services: a) Regulatory measures; b) Programs, projects; c) services
Inter-sectoral Integration: (projects could be combined into a program for a multi-sector issue)
CLUP – CDP Integration
Executive – Legislative Agenda
General Sectoral Development Planning Process

Sectoral development issues and concerns: (Eco Profile, Problem-solution finding analysis used)
Detailed / further investigations: if information is inadequate
Sectoral development objectives and targets: (can use vision-reality gap analysis)
Sectoral strategies and policies
Sectoral programs and projects
Project ideas or project briefs (inputs for LDIP)
New local legislation
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 6) (EnP Pack/Manuals/Local Planning Manuals/ CDP Guide)
Page 29
Local Development Investment Program
Development Fund
20% IRA + non-office (capital outlay + MOOE
Maintenance & Other Operating Expenses (MOOE)

 Local Finance Committee (LFC)
– sets level of annual expenditures based on approved development plans
LPDC, Budget Officer, Treasurer (+ Appropriations committee chair, Assessor, LGU Accountant, Private
sector representative, CSO representative)
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 8) (Manuals/Local Planning Manuals/ CDP Guide/Chapter III)
Page 30
Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) Process
Preparing Ranked List of Projects
Initiate LDIP (by LCE at start of term)
Solicit, compile project ideas (by LDPO from a) CDP; b) Sectoral Committee, c) others
Initial Screening (LDPO consolidates repetitive/redundant proposals, screens out
impractical, undesirable, more appropriately implemented by other agencies, orgs)
OUTPUT: Initial List
Screening for complementarity, compatibility, conflict (can be done simultaneously with Initial
Screening)
OUTPUT: Preliminary list screened on basis of technical, socio-political criteria (“Pre-LDIP”)
Project Ranking (using Goal-Achievement Matrix / Urgent, Essential, Necessary, Desirable,

Acceptable, Deferrable)
Estimating Project Costs
FINAL OUTPUT: Ranked list with Cost Estimates
2.
Determining Investible Funds
(by Local Finance Committee)
-
Collect revenue data, determine historical trends: Recurring (a-e), non-recurring (f)
a)
Real Property Taxes
c)
Other Taxes
e) Internal Revenue Allotment
b)
Business Fees and
d) Services and Operations
f) All others
Licenses
Income
-
Collect operating expenditure data, existing debt service, determine historical trends
A)
General Public Services
C)
Economic Services
B)
Social Services
D)
All others
Establish structural relationships of revenue, expenditure, to population & economic

development
Project future recurring LGU revenue and operating expenditure levels
Compute Financial Surplus (Projected revenues – OE – Debt Service = amount available)
Matching and Iteration
(LPDO prepares LDIP, submitted to LCE, endorsed to Sanggunian, LDIP gets adopted)
First Round Matching (projects that cannot be funded from recurring sources sent to LFC)
LDC approves ranked list of projects (through vote or resolution)
LDC deliberates decides on financing approach (Conservative, Developmental, Pragmatic)
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 8 Local Development Investment Programming)
Page 31
CLUP Relationship with National Plans and Programs
 Simplified Hierarchy and Linkage of Plans
N PFP
MTPDP
National (N)
MT DIP
Regional (R)
R DIP
R PFP
R DP
Provincial (P)/
P CDP/
P DIP/
P DPFP
City (C)
C CDP
C DIP
City (C)/
C /M
L DIP
C/M
Municipal (M)
CLUP
CDP
PFP = Physical Framework Plan
MTPDP = Medium Term Philippine Development
DPFP = Development and Physical Framework
Plan
Plan
DP = Development Plan
DIP = Development Investment Program
 Philippine Agenda 21: Policy framework for the country’s sustainable development strategy
The 5 Goal Elements
- Poverty Reduction (employment,

-
Peace and Solidarity
security)
- Social Equity (distribution of resources)
- Empowerment and Good Governance
-
Ecological Integrity
National Framework for Physical Framework Principles (NFPP 2001 – 2030)
-
Food Security
-
Market Orientation
-
Regional Urban Development
-
Environmental Stability and
- Equitable Access to physical and
Ecological Integrity
natural resources
-
Spatial Integration (linking
- Private – Public Sector Partnership
consumption / production areas)

- Recognition of the rights of
-
People Empowerment
Indigenous People
National Strategic Framework for Climate Change (NSFCC 2010-2022) - Integrated Ecosystem –
based Management
National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP)
RA 9729 Section 14: Mandates LGUs to formulate Local Climate Change Action Plans (LCCAP)
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/eCLUP Vol.1) (EnP Pack/National Plans and Frameworks)
Page 32
General Land Use Policy Areas
 Protected Areas – Life-support systems; food source, clean air/water, waste receptor -
NIPAS; - Non-NIPAS; - Protected Agricultural
Environmentally Constrained: forestland (slope > 18%), escarpments and fault zones (40m buffer
zones) waterfalls, volcanoes, geohazard areas.
Permanent Forest (virgin or old growth, primary broadleaf, areas with > 1000m elevation)
National Parks; - Forest; - Critical river Watersheds; - Forestland buffer zone
Integrated Social Forestry;
Watershed/water catchment reserve: forestland section with area 100m-radius around rivers,
springs which serve as catchment for water sources
Settlement Areas – “for living”
- Urban (town center/s); - Rural (upland, coastal, lowland); - Indigenous People’s Settlements
High/Low Density Residential (Building, structural, sanitary codes; clean air/water acts)
Socialized Housing (BP 220); (Public) open spaces (local ordinances); temporary residences
Infrastructure Areas – connecting Settlements and Production Areas

Transport Network, Social Infrastructure, Economic Infrastructure, Administrative Support
Production Areas – “for making a living”
Agricultural: Croplands, fishery, livestock, forestry, estates, SAFDZ (AFMA, CARL), Network of
Protected Areas for Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Development
Industrial: Estates, Special Economic Zone (PEZA)

Commercial; Business District (local ordinance)
- Tourism; - Mining Areas (mining laws);
(Rationalized Local Planning System/Chapter 2/ Chapter 5) (EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/eCLUP Vol.1)
2013 eCLUP 12 Step Process Diagram

Page 33
CLUP 12 Step Process (2006 CLUP Guide Vol. 1)
Getting Organized (LPDC prepares resources needed for planning activities)
Discuss need to prepare / update CLUP (with local officials; activities, rationale, framework)
Assess available resources (funds, personnel, equipment, supplies, materials)
Prepare proposal with work program, budget, teams
Present proposal to local officials (to LCE and Sanggunian for approval resolution)
Organize Planning Team (Executive Order designates members of Core team, TWG)
Brief Planning Team (on roles, responsibilities, and activities)
Disseminate information to general public (through barangay assemblies, IEC, etc.)
Identify Stakeholders
Workshops to identify stakeholders (by planning team, LDC, other committees)

Develop, implement IEC plan to inform, solicit support/commitment of stakeholders
Setting the Vision

Preparatory activities (Identifying participants, prepare workshop design)
Conduct Visioning Workshop

Disseminate Vision Statement (to Sanggunian, general public for feedback)
Validate, refine Vision Statement
Present to LDC to endorse to Sanggunian for adoption
IV. Analysing the Situation
Conduct sectoral studies (demography; social, economic, and infra sectors) (See Volume 2,
Guide/Manual to Sectoral Studies in CLUP Preparation)
Assessment of natural/physical/environmental features (including maps, land uses)

Process, analyse data gathered
Discuss existing situation of LGU (domains, natural/physical characteristics, envi)

Establish historical land use trends
Prepare map reflecting conservation, preservation, physical constraint areas
Quantify, tabulate conservation/preservation/protection areas

Determine available land supply for future development / expansion
Estimate total land area required for urban development, special planning areas
Cross – sectoral analysis and integration (to derive problems and issues) SWOT
Discuss LGU’s potentials and comparative advantages
Rank priority issues and problems (by urgency, seriousness, magnitude, etc.)
Determine possible interventions and parties concerned
V. Setting the Goals and Objectives
Review Vision Statement, result of situation analysis
Formulate goals LGU wishes to attain (broad statements, long-term)
Formulate objectives for each goal (SMART, short-range)
Page 34
VI. Establishing Development Thrust and Spatial Strategies
Generate ideas/options on appropriate development thrusts (using results of III, IV, V)

Develop 3 development strategies / scenario for each thrust
Evaluate alternative strategies (GAM, SCBA, PBS), select preferred / most suitable
Reflect Spatial strategy for preferred thrust on a map

Prepare Structure Plan (map providing overall framework for CLUP)
VII. Preparing the Land Use Plan (detailing preferred development strategy)
Review quantified land requirements (identified from IV, VI)

Match lands available with requirements
Design basic land use scheme (mapping)
3.1 Quantify, tabulate proposed land uses (including water bodies)
Plot / delineate proposed uses to create LGU Land Use Maps

Formulate land use policies
Delineate transportation network, circulation pattern

Identify programs and projects to support plan implementation
VIII. Drafting the Zoning Ordinance
Define title and purpose ( Art. I Title; Art. II Authority and Purpose)
Designate / classify specific zones (Art. IV Zone Classifications / Boundary Descriptions)
Identify zone use and regulations (Art. V Zone / Art. IV General District Regulations)
Determine innovative techniques, miscellaneous provisions and mitigating device (Art. VII, VIII,
IX titled similarly)
Identify / define provisions to administer, enforce ZO (zoning officer, LZBAA, LZRC) (Art. X
Administration and Enforcement)
List, define terms used in ZO (Art. III Definition of Terms)
IX. Public Hearing for the Draft CLUP and ZO
Prepare required documents for Public Exhibition and Information dissemination

Internal briefing prior to public hearing (to orient LCE, LDC, Sanggunian, departments)
Prepare information dissemination plan to general public

Constitute Public Hearing Board (LCE, LPDC; HLURB, Sanggunian, Sectoral reps)
Implement 3-stage process (Public exhibition, Public Hearing, Sanggu Committee hearings)
Consolidate, evaluate comments, suggestions and positions
Refine draft CLUP and ZO
Brief LDC, submit to Sanggunian for First / Second readings (prior to reviews)
X. Reviewing, Adopting, and Approving the CLUP and ZO
Sanggunian endorses / transmits final draft of CLUP/ZO to reviewing body
Review, approval, and ratification by the following: (EO 72)
Provincial Land Use Committee (PLUC) for Component Cities and Municipalities
HLURB, after Regional Land Use Committee (RLUC) for HUCs and ICCs, and MMDA for Metro
Manila LGUs
Page 35
LGU revises plan consistent with recommendations
Sanggunian conducts 3rd and final reading to adopt CLUP, enact ZO, then;
Submits to PLUC/HLURB for approval/ratification
Publish CLUP and ZO consistent with Section 59 of RA 7160
 PLUC Composition (PPDC Chair)

 RLUC Composition – NEDA (Chair)
- Provincial Planning and Development
- HLURB
- DA
- DAR
Coordinator;
- NGOs
- HUDCC
- DOT
- Provincial Agriculturist;
- DILG
- DENR
- DPWH
- HLURB
- DOTC
- DOST
- NGO Representatives in Provincial DC

- DENR
- DPWH
- DAR
- HLURB Field Operations Support Group
- DTI
- DILG
- DOT
(FOSG)
- MMDA Office of the Asst. Manager for
Planning (OAGMP)
XI. Implementing the CLUP and Zoning Ordinance

Strengthen existing institutional structure and mechanisms (offices, staff, committees)
Prioritize / access list of programs, projects from VII. Preparing Land Use Plan
Prepare IEC plan (to promote transparency, accountability

Review/revise budgetary requirements based on above steps to support implementation
XII. Monitoring, Reviewing, and Evaluating the CLUP and ZO
Organize monitoring, review and evaluation (MRE) teams

Develop monitoring systems and procedures (establish indicators)
Conduct actual monitoring
Evaluate results of monitoring (on-going / Periodic, Post)

Submit MRE Reports, findings and recommendations (to local officials for action)
LGU Authority Levers for CLUP Implementation

Regulation: Zoning (locational clearance)
Subdivision control (deeds of restrictions; paving requirements, provision of curbs, water lines)
Building regulation (building permit, building code oversight)
Environmental Law Enforcement Ordinances (for trees, signs, grading, air quality)
Taxation: Basic Taxes, Idle Lands, Impact fees, Special Benefit Levy, SEF
Acquisition: Fee Simple purchase, dedications, Eminent Domain, Exactions, Conservation easements
Public Investments: Expenditure, LDIP / AIP
Private Investment Incentives: Fiscal policies, Joint Ventures, BOT Schemes
Co-management
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/ (2006) CLUP Guide Vol.1 Process_HLURB)
Page 36
 General Zoning Map Color Codes
Municipal Waters
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/ (1996) CLUP Zoning Ordinance Model 1996_HLURB)
Color
Base Zones
Regulations / Uses
Codes
Forest (protection/production)
PD 705, NIPAS, specific proclamations
Agri (protection/production)
AFMA (NPAAAD, SAFDZ)
Residential – 1 (R-1)
Low-rise, 20 dwellings/ha; 3 storeys
R-2
Medium-density, multi-family; 3-5 storeys
R-3
Medium-high density, 3-12 storeys
R-4 / R-5
Low-rise townhouses/ high-rise; 3-18 floors
Commercial – 1 (C-1)
Neighbourhood-scale businesses; 3 storeys
C-2
Complementing/supplementing CBD; 6 storeys
C-3
High-density, might be CBD, 60 storeys
Industrial – 1 (I-1)
Non-pollutive / (non)-hazardous
I-2
Pollutive / (non)-hazardous
I-3
(highly) pollutive / (extremely) hazardous
General Institutional (GI)

Government offices. Hospitals, academics
Special Institutional (SI)

Social welfare homes, military bases
Parks /Cemetery
Recreation, internment of the dead
Utilities, Transportation
Transport terminals, power/water lines, telecoms
Overlay Zones
Ancestral Domain, Hazards, Ecotourism, etc.
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/ (2006) CLUP Guide Vol.3 Model Zoning Ordinance_HLURB)
CLUP Legal Mandates and Enabling Policy Environment

1987 Constitution
Article XIII, Section 1: “…the State shall regulate the acquisition, ownership, use and disposition of
property and its increments (to equitably diffuse wealth and power)
Article XII, Section 6: “…duty of the State to promote distributive justice and to intervene when the
common good so demands.”
EO 72 – For the preparation and implementation of CLUPs (Pres. Ramos, 1993)
Page 37
Section 1: (a) Cities and municipalities, (b) Metro Manila LGUs shall prepare, update their
CLUPs in conformity with planning standards and guidelines of HLURB
Section 2: (d) power of HLURB to approve/review CLUPs of component cities and municipalities
devolved to province;
Pursuant to LOI 729 S. of 1987, EO 648, RA 7279, CLUPs of Provinces, HUCs, and ICCs reviewed
and ratified by HLURB;
By EO 362 S. of 1990, CLUPs of Metro Manila LGUs shall be reviewed by HLURB
EO 648 – Reorganizing the HSRC (mandating HLURB) (a) To promulgate zoning and other land use
control standards and guidelines that shall govern CLUPs / ZO
RA 7169: Section 16 General Welfare Goal

Section 20 (c): Prepare CLUPs/ZO
Section 447 (Municipality)/ Section 458 (City): CLUPs in coordination with PLUP, ZO, prescribe
limits, restraints on property
Section 444 (Municipality)/455 (City): Adopt measures to safeguard/conserve natural resources
Section 468 (Province): Review CLUPs of component LGUs, adopt PLUP
RA 7279 Section 39 Role of Local Government Units – to prepare LUPs
 RA 9729 – Formulate CCA plans - RA 10121 – Mainstream DRR in Planning
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/eCLUP Vol.1)
Perspectives (Definitions) on Land

Common sense: solid portion of the Earth’s surface
Legal sense: ground, soil or earth that is subject of ownership and everything annexed to it
Economic sense: as a natural resource
As consumption good – enjoyed with no further production or processing (e.g. ecotourism areas)
As Factor of Production – physical base for production (factory or office location | as
“site”) or direct input resource extraction (farming, grazing, mining | as “soil”)

Ecological Sense: natural environment, surface of the Earth and all its attributes
Broad Concepts on Land
As a Natural Resource: provides intrinsic environmental value. Loses that but gains economic
value if developed
As Property: Ownership rights, limited by overall interests of society as administered by the
State
As Territory: absolute rights of the State over sovereign territory. The claim of a group of people
to have space to live and work in a manner consistent with their shared values and accepted
norms
Land Use Conversion – Reversible (soil to soil or site to site) or Irreversible (soil to site)
Land Use Capacity: practical limits to which land can be put to productive use
Page 38
Economic use Capacity: ability to produce net return above production costs of its use
Highest and Best Use: Use of land provides optimum return to operator or society
Carrying Capacity: Intensity of use that land can be put without causing significant damage
Sustainable Development: Highest and best use without exceeding carrying capacity
Land Use Planning: Proper management of land resources to promote the public interest
(E.M Serote/Property, Patrimony and Territory/Chapter 1 Essential Concepts Related to Land Use Planning )
Physical Determinants of Land Use
Topography – affects cost of development and production
Slope: gradient or inclination of a surface; ratio of vertical rise to horizontal run 0 - 3% - Flat /
level (3% minimum for natural drainage flow)
3 – 8% - Very gently to moderately sloping (undulating) (7% road construction limit) 8 – 18% -
Moderately sloping to strongly rolling
18 – 30% - Strongly rolling to hilly (18% above FMB recommended permanent forest) 30 – 50% -
Hilly to mountainous (30% limit for urban/agri, set by KSAs)
50% - above – Very Steep
Relief: differences in altitudes and slopes. Levelling or grading may be necessary

- Position: Location, elevation,
-
Cover: vegetation or rock outcrops
accessibility
-
Size and Shape: of a lot or parcel
Geology – rock and mineral structure of the Earth’s crust
Geomorphology: landforms (mountains, plains, coastal areas, swampland) Mountains - height no less
than 300m / 1,000ft, affects microclimate Coastal areas - 1 km landward from high tide to 200m
seaward isobaths
Soils: mixture of rock fragments and organic matter. Soil characteristics: Fertility - amount of
organic matter, presence of organisms
Structure - Form and shape of particles (granular to platy). Affects root, water penetration
Texture - Size of fragments. Determines water holding capacity

Less than 0.002mm – Clay 0.06 – 2.0mm - Sand
0.002 – 0.06mm – Silt > 2.0mm - Gravel
Soil Erosion: Searing away of land surface by running water, wind, ice, etc. Erosivity - potential
ability of rain to cause erosion (intensity, force of rainfall) Erodibility - vulnerability of soil to erosion
(physical characteristics, land cover)
Tolerable soil loss – max rate of annual erosion that permits sustained crop productivity
Hydrogeology: subsurface water or aquifer. Meters below ground surface (mbgs). Determines
potential groundwater and drainage capabilities
Transmissivity: rate of lateral flow Permeability: vertical flow, recharge
Page 39
Climate – Macro / Microclimate affected by ventilation, elevation, solar radiation, vegetation
Land Capability Classes

Class A: 0-3% slope. Very good agri land – deep soil, well-drained, fertile
Class B: 3-8% slope. Safely cultivated with conservation practices
Class C: 8-18% slope. Moderately good lands – cultivation with extensive conservation
Class D: 18-30% slope. Fairly good lands, requires complex conservation, best for tree crops
Class L: 0-3% slope. Too stony/wet for cultivation. Limited to pasture or forest use
Class M: 30-50% slope. Severely eroded, too shallow

Class N: >50% slope. Too shallow/rough/dry. Best for forest use
Class X: Mangrove swamps, marshes, wetlands. Best for fishponds, recreational or conserved
Class Y: Very hilly, mountainous, barren, rugged. Badlands and sand dunes. Reforested if able
Suitability Classes: Crop Specific (S1-3, N)
Pedo-Ecological Zones
Warm Pedo-Ecological Zone: > 100masl, 0-18% slope, > 25oC daytime (low-lying areas) Warm-
Cool (Upland) Zone: < 500masl, 0-18% slope; If > 18% slope, “Hilly and mountain” PEZ Cool
Pedo-Ecological Zone: >500masl, < 15oC daytime, varying topography
Economic Determinants of Land Use
Land Use Benefits

– Value of crops/minerals; increase in land value; non-monetary value (amenity)
Land Development Costs – direct outlays, recurrent costs, social costs

Ripening cost: cost of holding in present state when it is ripe for higher use
Land Value – in terms of appraisal, the present worth of future benefits from property
- Utility: capacity to satisfy needs, desires

-
Scarcity: demand greater than supply
- Effective demand: need/desire backed
-
Transferability: ease of transfer of
by financial means
ownership
 Some Economic Principles of Valuation of Property

Highest and best use - Balance: Max homogenous
market value if:
Change: market value estimate valid only on day Substitution: max cost
made Land, labor, capital in set at value of equal
equilibrium substitute
Progression/Regression: value affected by Complementary land
association uses in equilibrium
Consistent Use: must be valued with single use Conformity: max value
if economically/socially
Laws of Increasing and Decreasing returns
accessibility, competition, Patrimony and Territory/Chapter 2
Contribution: value of any etc. the same often Determinants of Land Use Decisions)
component of property is what it destroys
adds to the value of the whole Competition: profit. * If you must print, please use
excess profits scratch paper or print back to
back.
Supply and Demand: affected by attract (E.M
demographics change, function, Serote/Property,
Page 40
 Urban Land Value (Eugene F. Brigham) – function of:
- Accessibility value
-
Historical Factors: Succession of past
- Amenity value: subjectively perceived as
land uses of site. Indicates

“pleasantness” of the environment
appropriateness of current use

- Utilization: Existing and desired use of
-
Topography
area, as per land use and zoning maps
Social Determinants of Land Use
Social Values, Customs, Traditions – dietary habits, family ties, “hiya”, religion
Patterns of Land Ownership – size of land holdings, communal ownership, ancestral domains
Government and Political Influence: - to protect rights, regulate its exercise
Surface right: to enjoy current use of land (within limits of CLUP)

Productivity right: to make profit from land (controlled through taxation)
Development right: to improve land (limited by land use planning/zoning)
Pecuniary right: to benefit from development value (subject to special assessments)

Restrictive right: to not develop land (subject to idle lands tax)
Disposal right: to sell or will to others (donor’s tax, capital gains tax)
Article XII. National Economy and Patrimony, 1987 Constitution
Section 2: All lands of the public domain, waters, mineral, coal, petroleum, and other mineral
oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other
natural resources are owned by the State. With exception of agri lands, all other natural resources
shall not be alienated. The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be
under the full control and supervision of the State.
Section 3: Lands of the public domain are classified into agricultural, forest or timber, mineral
lands, and national parks. Alienable land of the public domain is limited to agri lands
Section 4: The Congress shall determine by law the specific limits of forest lands and national parks.
Thereafter, these shall be conserved and may not be increased or diminished except by law.
(E.M Serote/Property, Patrimony and Territory/Chapter 2 Determinants of Land Use Decisions)
National Urban Planning Commission (NUPC) 1946
First physical planning body in the country. Created by EO 98 by Pres. Sergio Osmeña
Primary function to prepare plans for reconstruction of urban areas destroyed by WWII
LGUs could reject its plans
RA 333 – Quezon City established as seat of National Government (July 17, 1948).
Created Capital City Planning Commission (CCPC). Functions like NUPC but area-specific.
National Planning Commission (NPC) – Created by Pres. Elpidio Quirino to consolidate duplication
of functions of planning bodies. Abolished 1972, declaration of Martial Law
Page 41
Task Force on Human Settlements (TFHS) created by EO 419 on Sept. 19, 1973
Evolved into Human Settlements Commission (HSC) through PD 933 on May 13, 1976.
National planning body created to institutionalize Human Settlements movement
Ministry of Human Settlements (MHS) created by PD 1396 after Habitat I (June 11, 1978) as
“Mother agency” to consolidate efforts of HSC and 30 gov’t entities. HSC gained “Regulatory”
(HSRC)
Human Settlements Regulatory Commission (HSRC) given quasi-judicial powers on Feb 8, 1981
through EO 648, giving 3 programs; Town Planning and Zoning, Real Estate Management,
Urban Land Reform
Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) replaced MHS which was
abolished 1986 after Marcos Regime
Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) is HRC renamed by EO 90 (1986)
(E.M Serote/Property, Patrimony and Territory/Chapter 4 Institutional Framework for Land Use Planning)
Executive – Legislative Agenda

An integrated plan containing the major development thrusts and priorities of both branches
Proposed ordinances, legislative measures to support priority projects
RA 7160 mandates LCES to: “present the program of government and propose
-
Sec 444(municipality),
Policies for the consideration of the
-
445 (city), 465 (province)
Sanggunian… initiate and propose legislative
measures to the Sanggunian”
12– Step ELA Planning Process

I. Planning to Plan – preparation of work plan, budget, team orientation, securing EO
ELA Team (Executive) LCE, LPDC, Dept. Heads; (Legislative) Vice LCE, Sanggunian
Secretary, Appropriations Committee Chair

Prioritizing Issues – “shortlisting” issue to be addressed during elected officials’ terms
Consulting with Stakeholders
IV. Defining / Revisiting LGU Vision and Mission

Formulating Goals and Objectives
VI. Prioritizing Programs, Projects, and Capacity Development Needs
- Plan for development of Competencies, Structure, Systems and Procedures, Logistics VII.
Determining Legislative Requirements – identifying policy gaps, priority Legislation &
when needed
VIII. Budgeting Commitment – Pledges, naming ELA to create sense of ownership
IX. Securing Endorsement and Approval – LDC endorses ELA and AIP to Sanggunian; adopts
former through resolution, latter through Appropriations Ordinance
X. Moving ELA to Action – Annual Operation/Work & Financial Plan, resource mobilization XI.
Popularizing the ELA – for support, transparency, accountability, through IEC, for a
XII. Managing and Sustaining ELA Implementation
[See: EnP Pack/Manuals/Local Planning Manuals/ELA Manual_DILG]
Page 42
 Population
Projection:
t
Geometric Method: Pt = P0 (1+r) r = ln (Pt /P0)
t
Pt = projected pop. for a certain year r = rate of growth
P0= base year t = time interval between the base and projected years
rt
Exponential Method: Pt = P0 e r = [log (Pt /P0)]
t log e
e = constant (the e of 1 is 2.71828)
-
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) = ____no. of births_______
x 1000
Midyear total population
-
Crude Death Rate (CDR) = ____no. of deaths_____
x 1000
Midyear total population
-
Infant Mortality Rate = ____no. of deaths_____
x 1000
no. of live births
Rate of Natural Increase (RNI) = Crude Birth Rate (CBR) –(CDR) Crude Death Rate
As percent / per 100 population = RNI
10
-
Doubling Time =
69.3______
- Sex Ratio = _M_ x 100
% Growth Rate
F
Three profiles of Population Pyramid

if “Ratio”, x 100
-
Expansive | Constrictive | Stationary
if “Rate”, x 1000
 Dependency Ratios
Po-14 + 65+
P15-64
0 – 14 Young Dependent
15 – 64 Productive Working
65 + Old Dependent
Page 43
Sectoral Standards
 Education
A. Pre-school (Kindergarten)
- Min 500 sqm lot = 4 classes - Classroom size = 1.5 sqm/child

Space for playground (140sqm) or open space within 200m walking distance
B. Elementary
Barrio school 0.5 ha = 2 classes (no Grade above Grade 4)

-
Central School
1 ha = 6 classes
3 ha = 10-12 classes
2 ha = 7 – 9 classes
4 ha = > 12 classes
-
Non-Central school
1 ha = 3-4 classes
-
Special Cases
Rural
Central
Barrio
0.5 ha
6 classes
3 – 4 classes
1.5 ha
7-10 classes
2 ha
> 10 classes
Urban
0.5 ha
6 classes
7 – 10 classes
0.75 ha
11-20 classes
> 21 classes
-
Classroom = 1.4sqm /pupil
- Medical /Guidance office = 28sqm gross
C. Secondary Schools - School buildings / structures = < 40% of school site (60% open space)
Trades Ec = 7sqm / place
Classroom = 1.4sqm / place Science lab = 2.1sqm / (wood/metal),
place Medical/Dental = 28sqm gross Admin = Practical Arts Homemaking = 4sqm /
5sqm/ place = 5sqm / place place Library
Tech/Home 2.4sqm/place
beds) = new Government Hospitals
College / Universities - Site area = 1.5 ha City/Main
0.5 ha / 500 students (ex. 2,000 health center = 35 km from existing
pupils = 2 ha) Regiona municipal level Government Hospital
l (200- - Any
School Age Population 300 RHU Personnel: Referral facility for 3 RHU /
beds) = main health center
Sprague multiplier = NSO age 2.5 ha - 1 per
groupings vs. school age brackets 50,000
Interpolation Technique Medical population If you must print, please use
Center 1 per scratch paper or print back to
Hospitals 20,000 back.
(>300
beds) = population
Standard Areas - Municipal 3.5 ha
(6 – 24 beds) / Provincial (100-199 Criteria for
Page 44
Permanent catchment population 75,000 / 25,000 for remote areas, 3 hours away
Municipal Hospital = 30 km service zone
Protective Services
A. Ideal police ratio = 1 per 500 population | Minimum ratio = 1per 1,000 population
Police Station
Area
Population (Component City)
(Municipal)
“A”
2,500 sqm
> 100,000
> 75,000
“B”
600 sqm
75,000 - 100,000
30,000 – 75,000
“C”
400 sqm
0 – 75,000
0 – 30,000
B. Fireman = 1: 2,000 population | Fire truck = 1:28,000 pop | Fire truck = 1:14 Firemen
C. Ideal - jail guard 1 : 5 inmates | Minimum - jail guard 1: 7 inmates
 Sports and Recreation
Minimum 500sqm / 1,000 population – city / municipal park Minimum 0.05 ha / 1,000 population –
playfield / athletic field
 Industrial
Scale
Capitalization
Employment
Classification
Micro-industry
< Php150,000
- -
Cottage Industry
Php150,000 – 1,500,000
< 10 workers
Small Scale
Php1,500,000 – 15,000,000
10 – 99 workers
Medium Scale
Php15,000,000 – 60,000,000
100 – 199 workers
Large Scale
> Php60,000,000
> 200 workers
Light Industry (I1) – non-pollutive / non-hazardous | non-pollutive / Hazardous Medium Industry

(I2) – Pollutive / non-hazardous | Pollutive / Hazardous
Heavy Industry (I3) – Highly Pollutive/ Non-hazardous; Hazardous; extremely hazardous -

Pollutive; non-pollutive / Extremely hazardous
Commercial = 1.5% - 3% of total built-up area Health Facilities = 0.4 ha / 1,000 population
Industrial = 2.5 ha /1,000 population Gov’t/Admin = 0.5 ha / 1,000 population
Schools = 0.8 ha / 1,000 population
Burial Grounds – minimum = 1m x 2.44m | 20m away from dwellings, 50m from rivers
Sanitary Landfill requirements: Total area x 1.5 to allow for roads, cover, etc.
Area = Waste generated (kg/year) x Residence time (year) 330 kg / m3 (DENR standard) 10m landfill
depth
Target service life of landfill 5 years | 75m away from faults, 50m away from waters
(EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides/ Guide on Sectoral Standards_HLURB)
Page 45
National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) – through PD 107

1987 Constitution Article XII, Section 9 (Independent Economic Planning Agency)
EO 230 1987 Reorganizes - NEDA
NEDA Project Development Cycle
Pre – Investment Phase - Project Identification
- Project Preparation (pre and feasibility studies)
- Project Appraisal and Financing

Investment Phase - Detailed Engineering and Design
- Project Implementation
Post – Investment Phase - Project Operation

- Ex-post Evaluation
 Project Decision Analysis
Discounting: conversion of future values to present using discount factors Discount Rates /
Factors
Net Present Value (NPV) – compares cost and benefit streams discounted to present
if NPV is positive / greater than 1, project viable and can be accepted

Budget constraint: choose project which maximizes NPV
Mutually Exclusive Projects: no budget constraint, chosen from mutually exclusive projects,
choose highest NPV
Different Project Lives: mutually exclusive, adjust lives, highest positive NPV
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – present value of benefits equals cost / NPV = 0
If IRR > cost of funds, implement, choose highest
Favors budgets with short lives
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) – ratio of present value (benefits to costs)
If BCR > 1, accept, select highest
Payback Period – years before discounted cumulative benefits repays cost
Bias towards quick-returning projects

Economic Evaluation
Social Discount Rate (SDR) – discount stream of economic cost and benefits to present values,
rate of social value declines over time (at 15%)
Page 46
1987 Constitution
Article I. National Territory – archipelago; terrestrial, fluvial, aerial domains
II. Declaration of Principles and State Policies – democratic, renounces war, separate from
Church; (5) promotion of general welfare, (10) social justice, (14) role of women, (16) balanced
ecology, (21) rural development / agrarian reform, (22) IP rights, (25) autonomy of LGUs.
III. Bill of Rights – (9) Private property cannot be taken without just compensation; rights
related to criminal prosecution.
IV. Citizenship - qualifications

V.. Sufrage – right to vote
Legislative Department – composition, government appropriations, passing of laws

VII.. Executive Department – the Presidency, powers and responsibilities
Judicial Department – composition, powers and mechanisms
Constitutional Commissions – Civil Service, Elections, Audit; responsibilities
Local Government – (2) local autonomy, (3) LGC, (5) creating revenue sources, (6) share in IRA and
(7) development of national wealth, (12) HUC, ICC Independence, (14) Regional Development councils
Accountability of Public Officers – (1) public trust; impeachment, powers of Ombudsman
XII. National Economy and Patrimony – (1) General Welfare 6/7, and (2) 4, natural resources belong to
the State, allow small-scale use, (3) public domain classification, can only be leased, (4) conservation of
forestlands, natural parks, (6) right to private property, (9) NEDA, 60% Filipino ownership
XIII. Social Justice and Human Rights – (1) regulation of property, (4) agrarian reform, (7) fisherfolk
rights, (9) urban land reform, (10) resettlement, (14) women’s working rights
XIV. Education, Science and Technology, Arts, Culture, and Sports – (5) right to select a course
XV. Family – foundation of the nation
PD 1151 “Philippine Environmental Policy”
Section 1. Policy – continuing policy of the State to create conditions where man and nature can
live in harmony, fulfill requirements of present and future generations.
Section 2. Goal – recognize responsibility of each generation as guardians of the environment,

preserving cultural / historic heritage, national resource use while preserving environment
Section 3. Right to a Healthy Environment – and everyone’s duty and responsibility to

contribute
Section 4. Environmental Impact Statements – basis for EIA system, directed to NEPC
(EnP Pack/Laws/National Laws (Misc.)) (EnP Pack/Laws/Environmental Protection)
Page 47
DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 37 S. of 1996
Revising DAO 21 S. of 1992; Strengthening EIS System
Section 2. Objectives – ensure maximum public participation in EIA process for social acceptability
validation
Section 3. Definition of Terms
Environmentally Critical Area (ECA) – environmentally sensitive and listed in Presidential

Proclamation 2146 S. of 1981 / PD 1586 (Sec. 4)
Environmentally Critical Project (ECP) – high potential for negative impact listed in Pres. Proc.
2146 S. of 1981 / PD 1586
(e) Environmental Management and Protect Areas Sector (EMPAS) of DENR
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) – process of predicting likely consequences of

implementing projects / undertakings and designing preventive/mitigating measures
EIA Review Committee (EIARC) – EMD / RED organized to review EIS

EIS – studies on direct/indirect consequences on human welfare, ecological integrity
(o) Environmental Management Plan – section in EIS detailing impacts and mitigating measures
Environmental Risk Assessment – use of scientific methods/information to define

probability/magnitude of adverse effects which result from exposure to hazard
materials/situations.
Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) – document required from proponents describing

impacts/mitigations in undertakings in ECA
(aa) Scoping – stage in EIS where info/assessment requirements established for scope of work
II. Scope of EIS
1. Coverage of EIS System (See Presidential Proclamation 2146 S. of 1981) - No ECP in ECA
without ECC
2. Non-Coverage – ECPs in ECAs before 1982 (except if expanded)
c. Country-side business and barangay entities (CBBEs) created RA 6810 - Magna Carta for
CBBEs (Kalakalan 20)
3. If project an ECP = do EIS; If project within an ECA, submit IEE (and/or EIS)
III. Procedural Flow of EIS

ECPs
Scoping – DENR, proponent, stakeholders link, agree on what issues, constraints, if EIA
required, issues of social acceptability. Identify EIARC
9.
Contents of EIS
-
Project Description
-
Envi Risk Assessment
-
Accountability Statements
-
Scoping Report
-
Envi Management Plan
-
Supporting docs
-
Baseline Envi
-
Proposals for Envi
(participation, econ data)
Conditions
monitoring/Guarantee
- Chapters on IP, women,
-
Impact Assessments
Funds
socio-econ impacts
10. Initial Review – by EMB
13. EIARC report on evaluation to EMB
Substantive Review – by EIARC
Page 48
14. EMB director’s recommendation to 15. DENR Secretary grants/denies ECC
DENR OSEC
Projects within ECAs
17. Submission of IEE – to EMPAS, PENRO, CENRO, LCEs
19. Contents of IEE
- Description of envi setting,

- Description of impacts
- Relationship of population/
impact areas
(envi/socio eco)
development/envi
- Description of project/
- Matrix of mitigation/
- Accountability Statements
undertaking
enhancement measures
(preparer/proponent)
- Consultation process undertaken
20-21. Review by EMPAS
EMPAS Report – to Regional Executive Director recommend issuance or not of ECC or prepare EIS
Regional Executive Director decides if ECC or EIS
26. Convene Regional EIARC for review / EMB support
IV. 10 Compliance Monitoring – multi-partite monitoring team (MMT) after ECC
VII. 4. Roles and Responsibilities of EMB
PD 1586 “Establishing an EIS System”
Section 2. EIS System pursuant to Sec 4 of PD 1151
Section 3. Ministry of Human Settlements (MHS) as lead agency
Section 4. Presidential Proclamation of ECA/ECP

Presidential Proclamation 2146 “Proclaiming Environmentally Critical Projects”
ECP – Heavy Industries, Resource Extractive Industries, Fishery Projects (dikes, fishponds), Major
Infras (dams, power plants, reclamation, roads/bridges), Golf courses
ECA - national parks, preserves, tourist spots, habitats, archaeological/scientific interest,

ancestral domain, frequently disastered, critical slopes
Prime agri lands, aquifer recharge, water bodies (domestic use, protected, fisheries)
Mangroves, coral reefs
(EnP Pack/Laws/Environmental Protection/Environmental Impact Statement)
RA 7586 “National Integrated Protected Areas System Act (NIPAS) of 1992”
Section 2. Declaration of Policy – to secure the existence of all native plants and animals
through protected areas within the ‘National Park’ classification, encompassing outstanding
remarkable areas and biologically important lands, habitats and ecosystems
Page 49
RA 7586 “National Integrated Protected Areas System Act (NIPAS) of 1992”
Section 3. Categories (and definitions provided in Section 4)
Strict Nature Reserve – an area with an outstanding ecosystem, scientifically important species,
maintained undisturbed for study, environmental monitoring, and genetic resources
Natural Park – relatively large area, maintained to protect inter- and nationally significant areas of
outstanding nature, scenery, for scientific, educational, recreational use
Natural Monument – relatively small area, to preserve nationally significant natural features with
special interest or unique characteristics
Wildlife Sanctuary – area which assures natural conditions to protect species, biotic communities
or physical features. May require human manipulation
Protect land/seascapes – harmonious interaction of man/land, opportunities for public enjoyment,

recreation and tourism within areas’ normal lifestyle and economic activity
Resource Reserve – extensive, isolated and uninhabited area, with natural resources protected
pending development based on knowledge and planning
Natural Biotic Area – set aside for societies in harmony with nature to modernize at their own pace
Other categories established by law, conventions or international agreements
Section 8. Bufer Zones – established for each protected area, outside boundaries but immediately
adjacent. Needs special development control to minimize harm to protected area.
Section 10. – NIPAS administered by DENR, creates Protected Areas and Wildlife Division under
Regional Technical Directors per region. (PAWB headed by Director)
Section 11. Protected Area Management Board - for each site a PAMB, composed of: DENR
Regional Executive Director, Province PDO, LGUs representatives, NGO, IP reps
Section 20. Prohibited Acts – hunting, destroying, possession of species without permit;
dumping or leaving exposed refuse; damaging objects of natural beauty or cultural interest;
occupying land or building structures without permits
DAO 25 S. of 1992 (NIPAS IRR)

Section 10. Protected Area Management Zoning
Strict Protection Zone – high biodiversity, only for scientific study, ceremonies
Sustainable Use Zone – allowed natural resource use through traditional, sustainable methods;
research and park visitation. Conserved for biodiversity
Restoration Zone – degraded habitats for rehabilitation, later stricter zoning

Habitat Management Zone – habitats required by rare, threatened, endangered species
Multiple – Use Zone – settlement, agriculture, forestry, or livelihood activities allowed by

management plan. Land tenure may be granted to IPs or migrants
Buffer Zone – effectively multiple-use zones that act as ‘social fences’
Cultural Zone – areas with significant cultural values, and/or where practices occur
Recreational Zone – allowed sustainable eco-tourism, recreational, educational activities
Special Use Zone – existing installations: telecoms, irrigation, power lines
(EnP Pack/Laws/Environmental Protection/NIPAS)
Page 50
RA 7916 “Special Economic Zone Act of 1995” (PEZA LAW)
Section 2 Accelerate industrial/economic/social development to provide jobs to then improve

level / quality of living
Section 3 Purposes, Intents and Objectives

Legal framework, mechanisms for planning, monitoring SEZs, IE/parks, EPZ, EZs
Transform areas into highly developed industrial, commercial, etc. centers

Promote foreign/local investors, establish linkages
Stimulate repatriation of Filipino capital
Cooperation between PH and industrialized countries, modernize industrial sector

SEZs as separate customs territory within Constitutional framework, territory of PH
Section 4 Definition of Terms
Special Economic Zone (SEZ) – “ECOZONES”. Potential/highly developed areas with agro
industrial, industrial, tourist/recreational, commercial, banking, investment, finance centers. May
have any/all of the following: IEs, EPZs, FTZs, Tourist centers
Industrial Estate (IE) – land subdivided/developed according to comprehensive plan, under

management, basic infra and utilities for community of industries
Export Processing Zone – specialized IE, physically or administratively outside customs territory, oriented to
export production. Capital equipment imports and raw materials free from taxes / restrictions
Free Trade Zone – Isolated policed area adjacent to port of entry where goods are manipulated
without import duties. Firms within zone have preferential tax treatment, lenient immigration
laws.
Section 5 Establishment of ECOZONES - (a-kk) designated areas of provinces/cities
(mm) any private IE which applies voluntarily, developed through Private, LGU, or National
Government initiative
- Borders delineated, proclaimed by President with PEZA, Sanggu, HLURB, RLUC, NLUC
Section 6 Criteria for Establishment - Can through LGU/PPP thru BOT law without National
Government help, secured against smuggling
Section 7 – ECOZONES to be decentralized community – self-reliant, self-sustaining, administer

itself (Sec. 15 ECOZONE Executive Committee – PEZA appointed admin)
Section 8 ECOZONE operated/managed as separate customs territory – by PEZA
Section 11 PEZA Board - attached to DTI (chair). Director General (Usec) appointed by President
Section 12 Functions and Powers of PEZA Board
Section 23 Fiscal Incentives – PD 66, Book IV EO 226 (Omnibus Investment Code), Export
Development act of 1994
Section 24 Exemption from National/Local Taxes – No taxes (except for RPT) for businesses | 5%
of gross income of firms within goes to: 3% to National Government, 2% to LGU
Section 25 Applicable Taxes – all taxes for persons, service firms under Internal Revenue Code, LGC
Section 30 Leases of Lands/Buildings – to foreign investors for 50 years, renewable for 25 Section
40 Percentage of Foreign Nationals in supervisory roles not > 5% of workforce
(EnP Pack/Laws/Environmental Protection/Economic)
Page 51
RA 9184 “Government Procurement Reform Act”
Section 3 Governing Principles on Government Reform
(a) Transparency (c) Streamlined Procurement (e) Public Monitoring
(b) Competitiveness (d) System of Accountability
Section 5 Definition of Terms
(e). Competitive Bidding – Advertisement, Pre-Bid Conference, Eligibility Screening of

Prospective Bidders, Receipt and Opening of Bids, Evaluation of Bid, Post Qualification, Award of
Contract
(g) Goods – Equipment; Trucking, Hauling (non-personal); Materials, Supplies, Furniture;

Janitorial, Security (contractual services)
Head of Procuring Entity (HOPE)

National Government Agency: Head/authorized official
GOCC: Governing Board/ authorized official
LGU: Local Chief Executive
Section 7 Procurement Planning and Budget Linkage
- All procurement within Approved Budget; no procurement without Annual Procurement Plan
Section 10 Competitive Bidding – for all procurement
Section 11 BAC Composition
rd
5-7 Members chaired by at least 3 ranking permanent official (other than head)
Fixed 1 year term, renewable by HOPE (legal/admin rep, finance rep (both 5th ranking))
Section 12 Functions - (See Sec. 5), recommend Alternative Methods
Section 13 Observers – 1 COA rep, 1 private sector rep, and 1 NGO rep duly SEC registered
Section 24 Shortlisting for Consulting Services – for bidders

Section 25 Submission and Receipts of Bids
technical/financial envelopes submitted simultaneously
Section 26 Modification and Withdrawal of Bids – modify before deadline, if withdrawn no

longer allowed to submit for same contract
Section 27 Bid Security – guarantee that bidder will enter into contract after Notice of Award
Section 30 Preliminary Examination of Bids – “Pass/fail” criteria. Financial component only
opened after technical passes
Section 32 Bid for Procurement of Goods and Infra Projects – preliminary exam passers will be
ranked financially, lowest referred to as “Lowest Calculated Bid”
Section 33 Bid Evaluation of Shortlisted bidders for Consulting Services
Numerical ranks for criteria such as experience, performance, etc. = “Highest Rated Bid”
HRB negotiation/clarification on financial proposal, terms of reference, etc.
If negotiation fails, next ranking bidder. Ceiling is amount in financial envelope/ABC
(EnP Pack/Laws/Government Procurement)
Page 52
Section 34 Post-Qualification
verification/validation if requirements/conditions met in Bidding docs

If passed, Lowest Calculated Bid = “Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid”;
Highest Rated Bid = “Highest Rated Responsive Bid”

If failed, becomes “post-disqualified”. Then next LCB/HBR becomes LCRB/HRRB
Section 35 Failure of Bidding – if:
(a) No bids received (c) when bidder with Lowest/Highest Rated refuses to accept
None qualifies for Lowest/Highest Responsive Bid
nd
Rebidding same process. If 2 Failed bidding, may resort to Negotiated Procurement (sec. 53)
Section 36 Single Calculated/Rated and Responsive Bid Submission – considered if
Only one bidder submits Letter of Intent, applies for eligibility check, passes, then bids
More than one bidder but only one passes eligibility
If more pass eligibility, but only one bids
Section 37 Notice and Execution of Award

15 days after Lowest/Highest Responsive bid, issue Notice of Award
10 days after Notice of Award, bidder enters contract – 20 days for approval (30 for GOCCs)
7 days after approval of contract, Notice to Proceed
Section 38 Procurement Process shall not exceed 3 months
Section 39 Performance Security – before signing of contract
Section 40 Disqualified if unable to enter contract or post Performance Security. Post-

qualification for next ranked bidder
Section 46 Lease Contracts – for equipment, subject to same bidding process Section 48
Alternative Methods – by approval of HOPE /rep, if justified
Limited Source Bidding/Selective Bidding – direct invitation to pre-selected suppliers/consultants
Direct Contracting/Single Source Procurement – supplier asked to submit price quotation or pro-
forma invoice with conditions of sale – may be accepted or negotiated with
Repeat Order – direct procurement of goods from previous winning bidder of competitive
bidding
Shopping – request for submission of price quotations for off-the-shelf goods or ordinary/regular
equipment from suppliers of known qualification
Negotiated Procurement – extraordinary circumstances (sec. 53) or Failed Bidding – negotiates

contract with supplier, contractor or consultant
Section 49 Limited Source/Selective Bidding – only if:
Highly specialized goods/consulting obtainable from limited sources
Major plant components to maintain uniform quality
Section 50 Direct Contracting – only if:
Proprietary goods/source – copyright, patent, trade secrets
Critical components from specific supplier
Exclusive dealer/manufacturer
Page 53
Section 51 Repeat Order – if in Annual Procurement Plan
(a) Same/lower price; (b) no splitting of requisitions/purchase orders;

Valid only 6 months after Notice to Proceed from last order
Not >25% quantity of original contract
Section 52 Shopping
Unforeseen contingency <Php50,000
Ordinary office supplies/equipment not available from Procurement Service, <Php250,000, not
Split contracts, 3 price quotations/suppliers
Section 53 Negotiated Procurement – (a) After 2 Failed Biddings (sec. 35)
(b). necessary immediate action (emergencies, calamities)
Take-over of contracts if for necessary immediate action (emergencies, calamities)
Contract contiguous/adjacent to on-going infra project resulting from competitive bidding.

Covers consultancy contracts
Purchases of Goods from other Government Agencies (like DBM Procurement Service)
Section 55 Protests on BAC Decisions – letter, protest fee (1% of ABC)
Section 63 Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB)
Section 64 Membership
DBM Sec (Chair); NEDA Director-General (Alt Chair)
Private Sector Rep (Presidential Appointment)

DPWH, DOF, DTI, DOH, DND, DepEd, DILG, DOST, DOTC, DOE Secretaries/reps
(EnP Pack/Laws/Environmental Protection/Economic/BOT Law)


Hlurb - Clup Guidebook Vol 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hlurb - Clup Guidebook Vol 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hlurb - Clup Guidebook Vol 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

Reviewer for the 2015 EnP Board Exam

Prepared by Cid Jacobo (encoded as is from personal handwritten notes)

+ REMINDER: This reviewer is neither comprehensive nor complete +

Recommended Must Reads

Readings by Sir Ernesto M. Serote (EnP Pack/Manuals/Local Planning Manuals)

DILG’s CDP Preparation Guide

HLURB CLUP Guide Books (EnP Pack/Manuals/CLUP Guides)

2013 eCLUP Guidebook Vol. 1, 2, 3

Important Laws (EnP Pack/Laws)

Plans and Frameworks (EnP Pack/Laws/National Plans and Frameworks)

National Framework for Physical Planning 2001-2030

Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2011-20

Kevin Lynch (EnP Pack/References and Readings/Classic Readings/Kevin Lynch)

The Image of the City (Chapter III)

environme known as settlements planning, refers to

“…professional services in the form of - Preservation and enrichment of culture

and /or implementation involving:” - Enhance right to a balanced ecology

(a) Community, town, city, or region - Development of appropriate and self-

(b)Development of a site for a particular capabilities

need (housing, institutions, etc.) - Improve public morals

arrangements of buildings, utilities social justice

(c) Land Use /zoning plans for - Promote full employment

preservation of environment - Preserve comfort and Convenience

(d) Pre-Investment, feasibility studies

Urban Planning Models

City Beautiful Movement

Emphasis on aesthetics in urban design and planning: monumentality (drama), exuberance,

Public works designed with classical facades – beauty stood supreme

Urban Planning Models (cont)

City Efficient Movement

Rationalize urban planning in relation to decentralized economic production; transport planning

“Ekistics” – science of human settlements integrates economics, physical design

New Urbanism / Neo-Traditionalism

- Reviving “lost art of place-making”  Urban Renewal (US Federal Program)

- Opposes suburbs; rebuilding inner - Redevelop outworn, physically

traditions, core values- Tax increment financing – urban renewal

- Fostering informal human interaction bonds paid by future tax revenues

pedestrianization, mixed-use to attract business, elite occupants.

Tends to ‘yuppification’, social

- Ecology and environmental constraints

- Exurb (extra-urban); Suburbanization

Clarence S. Stein (1882-1975) Sir Leslie Patrick Abercrombie

Co-founded Regional Planning Association (1879-1957) Abercrombie Plan: London re-

Lewis Mumford (1895-1990) Ian L. McHarg (1920-2001)

Father of Historical Sociological Approach First modern environmental planner;

Ecological planning through map overlay

Rachel Louise Carson

American biologist, “eco-feminist” who sparked environmental movement in US thru ‘Silent

Advocacies led to US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Impact Assessment

Theories of Urban Growth

 Human Ecology (Chicago School of Urban Sociology) – Robert Park

6. Decentralization: locating away from central city

Huge Urban-Rural wage differentials Labor surplus due Restrictions on

Theories of Urban Growth / Land Use

 Concentric Ring Theory (1925)

Outward pressure as those with higher income pursue better environment

Industries / Transition Area

IV. Residential Area

Zone I – CBD. Only scattered residences remain