Case Study On Burj Khalifa
Case Study On Burj Khalifa
Case Study On Burj Khalifa
Burj khalifa
A SEMINAR REPORT
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
I hereby declare that the work, which is being presented in the seminar
report, entitled “CASE STUDY ON BURJ KHALIFA" in partial fulfilment
for the award of Degree of “Bachelor of Technology” in Civil
Engineering submitted to the Department of civil Engineering, Arya
College of Engineering &Research Centre, Rajasthan Technical
University is a record of my own work carried under the Guidance of
Mr. Kapil Karadia (Head of Department-CE).
I have not submitted the matter presented in this Report anywhere for
the award of any other Degree.
We would like to first of all express our thanks to Dr. Pooja Agarwal,
Director of Arya Main Campus, for providing us such a great
infrastructure and environment for our overall development.
We express sincere thanks to Prof. Himanshu Arora, Principal of
ACERC, for his kind cooperation and extendible support.
I would also like to thank Mr. Kapil Karadia, H.O.D of CE Department,
for their contribution in preparing my Minor project report and to guide
me for delivering the seminar. And for his painstaking efforts and
enthusiastic cooperation to make seminar possible.
Burj Khalifa ("Khalifa Tower"), known as Burj Dubai prior to its inauguration,
is a skyscraper in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and is currently the tallest man-
made structure ever built, at 828 m (2,717 ft). Construction began on 21
September 2004, with the exterior of the structure completed on 1 October 2009.
The building officially opened on 4 January 2010 and is part of the new 2 km2
(490-acre) flagship development called Downtown Dubai at the 'First
Interchange' along Sheikh Zayed Road, near Dubai's main business district.
The tower's architecture and engineering were by Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill
of Chicago, with Adrian Smith (now at his own firm) as chief architect, and Bill
Baker as chief structural engineer performed the primary contractor was Samsung
C&T of South Korea.
The total cost for the project was about US $1.5 billion; and for the entire
"Downtown Dubai" development, US $20 billion. In March 2009, Mohamed Ali
Alabbar, chairman of the project's developer, Emaar Properties, said office space
pricing at Burj Khalifa reached US $4,000 per sq. ft (over US $43,000 per m2)
and the Armani Residences, also in Burj Khalifa, sold for US $3,500 per sq. ft
(over US $37,500 per m2).
The project's completion coincided with the global financial crisis of 2007–2010,
and with vast overbuilding in the country, led to high vacancies and foreclosures.
With Dubai mired in debt from its huge ambitions, the government was forced to
seek multibillion-dollar bailouts from its oil rich neighbour Abu Dhabi.
Subsequently, in a surprise move at its opening ceremony, the tower was renamed
Burj Khalifa, said to honour the UAE President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan for
his crucial support.
The CN Tower in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, was the world's tallest freestanding
structure from 1975 to 2007, although it arbitrated Burj Khalifa, a skyscraper in
Dubai that reached 829.8 m (2,722 ft) in height on January 17, 2009, to be the
tallest.
FACTS ABOUT BURJ DUBAI
Milestones:
➢ January 2004: Excavation commences.
➢ February 2004: Piling starts.
➢ 21 September 2004: Emaar contractors begin construction.
➢ March 2005: Structure of Burj Khalifa starts rising.
➢ June 2006: Level 50 is reached.
➢ February 2007: Surpasses the Sears Tower as the building with the
most floors.
➢ 13 May 2007: Sets record for vertical concrete pumping on any
building at 452 m (1,483 ft), surpassing the 449.2 m (1,474 ft) to which
concrete was pumped during the construction of Taipei 101, while Burj
Khalifa reached 130 floors.
➢ 21 July 2007: Surpasses Taipei 101, whose height of 509.2 m (1,671
ft) made it the world's tallest building, and level 141 reached.
➢ 12 August 2007: Surpasses the Sears Tower antenna, which stands
527.3 m (1,730 ft).
➢ 12 September 2007: At 555.3 m (1,822 ft), becomes the world's
tallest freestanding structure, surpassing the CN Tower in Toronto, and
level 150 reached.
➢ 7 April 2008: At 629 m (2,064 ft), surpasses the KVLY-TV Mast to
become the tallest man-made structure, level 160 reached.
➢ 17 June 2008: Emaar announces that Burj Khalifa's height is over
636 m (2,087 ft) and that its final height will not be given until it is
completed in September 2009.
➢ 1 September 2008: Height tops 688 m (2,257 ft), making it the tallest
man-made structure ever built, surpassing the previous record-holder,
the Warsaw Radio Mast in Konstantynów, Poland.
➢ 17 January 2009: Topped out at 828 m (2,717 ft).
➢ 1 October 2009: Emaar announces that the exterior of the building
is completed.
➢ 4 January 2010: Burj Khalifa's official launch ceremony is held and
Burj Khalifa is opened. Burj Dubai renamed Burj Khalifa in honour of
the current President of the UAE and ruler of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh
Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan.
WORLD RECORDS:
At over 828 metres (2,716.5 feet) and more than 160 stories, Burj Khalifa holds
the following records:
• Tallest building in the world
Figure 1. An elevation view of the tower’s foundation system (Burj Khalifa 2010)
The overall design of the tower came from the geometry of a desert flower
indigenous to the region, the Hymenocallis, which resembles many Islamic
architectural schemes.
A view of the tower can be found in Figure 3. By design, this flower’s “Y” shape,
contributes to the tower’s ability to minimize wind loads and creates a simple
structural plan to follow throughout construction. The central core provides a
support system against the lateral forces that act on the three outward wings. The
wings are constructed with high-performance concrete corridor walls and
perimeter columns that come together creating the six-sided central core.
From the ground up, each wing contains four bays that setback from the structure
at seven-floor intervals making the tower appear to spiral upward into the sky.
In addition to aesthetics, the combination of the central core and wings
strengthens the tower against lateral and torsional forces, maximizes viewing
space, provides ample natural light inside, and lowers energy use.
The Burj Khalifa stands as a high-performance reinforced concrete system from
the foundation to the 156th floor. The concrete walls of the central core resist
torsional forces, much like an axle on a car, as outriggers on the mechanical levels
allow all the concrete in the columns to efficiently handle both vertical and lateral
loads. The concrete mix for the walls contains Portland cement and fly ash with
a mixture of local aggregates, which yielded a modulus of elasticity equal to
43,800 N/mm2 (6,350 ksi).
Design engineers used Lagrange multiplier methods along with other
enhancements to optimize the wall and column sizes and to lessen the effects of
creep and shrinkage on critical elements of the structure. To avoid discrepancy in
the shortening of these critical elements, the columns were designed to have a
gravity induced stress equal to the induced stress on the interior walls.
Five sets of outriggers located on various levels of the structure further lessen the
effects of differential shortening due to creep by connecting all the vertical load
bearing elements together.
From the 156th floor to the pinnacle, the tower consists of a structural steel,
diagonally-braced framing system designed for gravity, wind, seismicity, and
fatigue in agreement with the Load Resistance and Factor Design Specifications
of the American Institute of Steel Construction. Workers flame-applied an
aluminium finish to the exterior steel to reduce the effects of corrosion.
Additionally, the steel spire consists of reinforced concrete
walls, link beams, slabs, rafts, and piles. Engineer’s utilized full 3-D model
software to analyse the effects of wind loading in the lateral, perpendicular lateral,
and torsional directions on the spire’s framing system and found all deflections
to be well below the most commonly used sideway criteria.
Construction Planning
The construction of such a tall and detailed structure called for a specific
development plan. Project managers began by establishing a three-day-cycle plan
for all the structural work that divided the construction into segments promoting
the staff to work at a quick yet manageable pace. Engineers applied the latest
advancements in high-rise technology involving an optimal concrete formwork
system that could accommodate the various geometries of the tower.
The steel reinforcement sections for the walls were prefabricated on the ground
to minimize construction time and worker transportation. Also, a revolutionary
automatic self-climbing formwork machine designed to be dismantled and
reassembled by a small workforce quickly formed the walls.15 The central core
and slab sections were cast first followed by the wing walls, nose columns, and
slabs. The circular nose columns were formed with steel forms while the slabs
were casted in MevaDec formwork, a versatile formwork system that can be
quickly assembled to minimize work time and construction costs. Selecting the
most effective equipment for the job and logistically coordinating the delivery of
materials and workers were major elements of the construction plan. Engineers
had to develop a pumping system for distributing the concrete mixtures
throughout the sections and levels of the structure. According to Baker and his
report team, this system consisted of three specialized Putzmeister pumps with
the largest having the capability of pumping concrete to heights of 600 meters in
a single pump stage.
These three main pumps were located at the ground level; however, project
managers placed an emergency pump on the 124th level to assist in pumping
during any complications. Five pump lines ran vertically through the structure
with two located in the central core and one in each of the three wings. Along
with the high-powered pumping system, three high capacity self-climbing tower
cranes were utilized at the tower’s core, and additional hoists were installed to
handle other lifting duties. Furthermore, a special GPS system, instead of
conventional surveying techniques, was used to constantly measure vertical data
from the structure. As the geometry of the structure continually changed,
managers had to continually analyse and modify these logistical plans.
For all the structural concrete, engineers used a rigorous testing program allowing
for the development of curing plans that took into account the daily and seasonal
temperature variations. According to Abdelrazaq’s report team, conventionally
structures are examined using elastic finite-element analysis or by summing
vertical loads, but since the Burj Khalifa is so tall, these conventional analysis
techniques were predicted to yield inaccurate structural behaviour.
Because differential creep and shrinkage redistribute forces, analysts developed
a sequential analysis system that took these time-dependent factors into account.
Engineers divided the structure into fifteen different three-dimensional finite-
element analysis models, which could be accurately examined for creep,
shrinkage, and stiffness over a discrete period of time as incremental loads were
added. To counteract the redistribution of forces, structural engineers designed
each tier of the tower to be “re-centered” minimizing gravity’s horizontal sideway
as the tower was erected. Analysing these time-dependent loading effects freed
engineers to make other design modifications that included slight increases in
floor heights to sustain the structural integrity. The rigorous testing procedures
and complex analysis measures testified to the ingenuity of the entire construction
planning process
The top four floors have been reserved for communications and broadcasting.
These floors occupy the levels just below the spire.
j) Fire Safety
Fire safety and speed of evacuation were prime factors in the design of Burj
Khalifa. Concrete surrounds all stairwells and the building service and fireman's
elevator will have a capacity of
5,500 kg and will be the world's tallest service elevator. Since people can't
reasonably be
expected to walk down 160 floors, there are pressurized, air-conditioned refuge
areas located approximately every 25 floors.
k) Elevators & Lifts
The goal of the Burj Dubai Tower is not simply to be the world's highest building;
it's to embody the world's highest aspirations. The 280 000 m2 (3 000 000 ft2)
reinforced concrete multi-use tower is utilized for retail, a Giorgio Armani Hotel,
residential and office. Designers purposely shaped the structural concrete Burj
Dubai—'Y' shaped in plan—to reduce the wind forces on the tower, as well as to
keep the structure simple and foster constructability. The structural system can be
described as a 'buttressed' core. Each wing, with its own high-performance
concrete corridor walls and perimeter columns, buttresses the others via a six-
sided central core, or hexagonal hub. The result is a tower that is extremely stiff
laterally and torsionally. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) applied a rigorous
geometry to the tower that aligned all the common central core, wall, and column
elements.
Figure 3: floor plan of Burj Khalifa
Each tier of the building sets back in a spiral stepping pattern up the building. The
setbacks are organized with the tower's grid, such that the building stepping is
accomplished by aligning columns above with walls below to provide a smooth
load path. This allows the construction to proceed without the normal difficulties
associated with column transfers. The setbacks are organized such that the tower's
width changes at each setback. The advantage of the stepping and shaping is to
'confuse the wind'. The wind vortexes never get organized because at each new
tier the wind encounters a different building shape.
The centre hexagonal reinforced concrete core walls provide the torsional
resistance of the structure similar to a closed tube or axle. The centre hexagonal
walls are buttressed by the wing walls and hammerhead walls, which behave as
the webs and flanges of a beam to resist the wind shears and moments. Outriggers
at the mechanical floors allow the columns to participate in the lateral load
resistance of the structure; hence, all of the vertical concrete is utilized to support
both gravity and lateral loads. The wall concrete specified strengths ranged from
C80 to C60 cube strength and utilized Portland cement and fly ash. Local
aggregates were utilized for the concrete mix design. The C80 concrete for the
lower portion of the structure had a specified Young's elastic modulus of 43 800
N/mm2 (6350 ksi) at 90 days.
The wall and column sizes were optimized using virtual work/LaGrange
multiplier methodology, which results in a very efficient structure. The reinforced
concrete structure was designed in accordance with the requirements of ACI 318-
02 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.
The wall thicknesses and column sizes were fine tuned to reduce the effects of
creep and shrinkage on the individual elements which compose the structure. To
reduce the effects of differential column shortening, due to creep, between the
perimeter columns and interior walls, the perimeter columns were sized such that
the self-weight gravity stress on the perimeter columns matched the stress on the
interior corridor walls. The five sets of outriggers, distributed up the building, tie
all the vertical load- carrying elements together, further ensuring uniform gravity
stresses, hence reducing differential creep movements. Since the shrinkage in
concrete occurs more quickly in thinner walls or columns, the perimeter column
thickness of 600 mm (24 in.) matched the typical corridor wall thickness (similar
volume-to-surface ratios) (Figure 4b) to ensure the columns and walls will
generally shorten at the same rate due to concrete shrinkage. The top section of
the tower consists of a structural steel spire utilizing a diagonally braced lateral
system. The structural steel spire was designed for gravity, wind, seismic and
fatigue in accordance with the requirements of AISC Load and Resistance Factor
Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (1999). The exterior exposed
steel is protected with a flame-applied aluminium finish.
The structure was analysed for gravity (including P-A analysis), wind, and
seismic loads using ETABS version 84. The three-dimensional analysis model
consisted of the reinforced concrete walls, link beams, slabs, raft, piles, and the
spire structural steel system (Figure 4).
The reinforced concrete structure was designed in accordance with the
requirements of ACI 318-02 (American Concrete Institute) Building Code
Requirements for Structural Concrete. The Dubai Municipality (DM) specifies
Dubai as a UBC97 Zone 2a seismic region (with a seismic zone factor Z = 015
and soil profile Sc). The seismic analysis consisted of a site-specific response
spectra analysis. Seismic loads did govern the design of the reinforced concrete
podium buildings and the tower structural steel spire. Dr. Max Irvine (with
Structural Mechanics & Dynamics Consulting Engineers) developed site-specific
seismic reports for the project, including a seismic hazard analysis. The potential
for liquefaction was investigated based on several methods; it was determined
that liquefaction is not considered to have any structural implications for the
deep-seated tower foundations.
3 WIND ENGINEERING
For a building of this height and slenderness, wind forces and the resulting
motions in the upper levels become dominant factors in the structural design. An
extensive program of wind tunnel tests and other studies were undertaken (Figure
5). The wind tunnel program included rigid model force balance tests, full multi-
degree of freedom aeroelastic model studies, measurements of localized
pressures, pedestrian wind environment studies, and wind climatic studies. Wind
tunnel models account for the cross-wind effects of wind-induced vortex
shedding on the building (Figure 6). The aeroelastic and force balance studies
used models mostly at 1: 500 scale.
To determine the wind loading on the main structure, wind tunnel tests were
undertaken early in the design using the high-frequency force-balance technique.
The wind tunnel data were then combined with the dynamic properties of the
tower in order to compute the tower's dynamic response and the overall effective
wind force distributions at full scale.
For the Burj Dubai the results of the force balance tests were used as early input
for the structural design and detailed shape of the tower and allowed parametric
studies to be undertaken on the effects of varying the tower's stiffness and mass
distribution.
The building has essentially six important wind directions. The principal wind
directions are when the wind is blowing into the 'nose'/'cutwater' of each of the
three wings (Nose A, Nose B, and Nose C).
The other three directions are when the wind blows in between two wings, termed
the 'tail' directions (Tail A, Tail B, and Tail C). It was noticed that the force
spectra for different wind directions showed less excitation in the important
frequency range for winds impacting the pointed or nose end of a wing (Figure
7) than from the opposite direction (tail). This was borne in mind when selecting
the orientation of the tower relative to the most frequent strong wind directions
for Dubai and the direction of the setbacks.
Several rounds of force balance tests were undertaken as the geometry of the
tower evolved and was refined architecturally. The three wings set back in a
clockwise sequence, with the A wing setting back first. After each round of wind
tunnel testing, the data were analyzed and the building was reshaped to minimize
wind effects and accommodate unrelated changes in the client's program.
In general, the number and spacing of the setbacks changed as did the shape of
wings. This process resulted in a substantial reduction in wind forces on the tower
by 'confusing' the wind (Figure 8) by encouraging disorganized vortex shedding
over the height of the tower. Towards the end of design more accurate aeroelastic
model tests were initiated. An aeroelastic model is flexible in the same manner as
the real building, with properly scaled stiffness, mass and damping. The
aeroelastic tests were able to model several of the higher translational modes of
vibration. These higher modes dominated the structural response and design of
the tower except at the very base, where the fundamental modes controlled. Based
on the results of the aeroelastic models, the predicted building motions are within
the ISO standard recommended values without the need for auxiliary damping.
The tower raft is supported by 194 bored cast-in-place piles. The piles are 15 m
in diameter and approximately 43 m long, with a design capacity of 3000 tonnes
each. The tower pile load test supported over 6000 tonnes (Figure 9). The C60
(cube strength) SCC concrete was placed by the tremie method utilizing polymer
slurry.
The friction piles are supported in the naturally cemented calcisilt-
ite/conglomeritic calcisiltite formations, developing an ultimate pile skin friction
of 250350 kPa (2-6-3-6 tons/ft2). When the rebar cage was placed in the piles,
special attention was paid to orient the rebar cage such that the raft bottom rebar
could be threaded through the numerous pile rebar cages without interruption,
which greatly simplified the raft construction.
Long-term creep and shrinkage testing, over one year in duration, have been
performed by the CTL Group (located in Skokie, IL, USA), under contract with
Samsung, on concrete specimens to better understand the actual behaviour of the
concrete utilized for the project.
Compensation methodology:
The tower is being constructed utilizing both a vertical and horizontal
compensation program. For vertical compensation, each story is being
constructed incorporating a modest increase in the typical floor-to-floor height.
For horizontal compensation, the building is being 'recentered' with each
successive centre hex core jump. The re-entering compensation will correct for
all gravity induced sideway effects (elastic, differential foundation settlement,
creep, and shrinkage) which occur up to the casting of each story.
Vertical shortening:
Based on the procedures presented above, the predicted time-dependent vertical
shortening of the centre of the core can be determined at each floor of the Burj
Dubai tower (Figure 15), not accounting for foundation settlements. The total
predicted vertical shortening of the walls and columns at the top of the concrete
core, subsequent to casting, is offset by the additional height added by the
increased floor-to-floor height compensation program.
Due to the compatibility requirements of strain between the rebar and the concrete
in a reinforced concrete column, as the concrete creeps and shrinks, i.e., shortens,
the rebar must attract additional compressive stress and forces to maintain the
same strain as the concrete. Since the total load is the same, over time part of the
load in a reinforced concrete column is transferred from the concrete to the rebar.
This un-loading of the concrete, therefore, also reduces the creep in the concrete
(less load results in less creep). As per Figure 16, the rebar in the columns and
walls (with a rebar-to-concrete area ratio of about 1%) at Level 135 supports
about 15% of the load at the completion of construction and the concrete supports
85%. however, after 30 years, the rebar supports 30% of the total load and the
concrete supports 70%. This percent increase in force carried by the rebar
increases as the steel rho is increased and/or as the total load decreases.
Gravity-induced horizontal sideway
Extreme ends of the building causing curvature which is integrated along the
height of the structure. Concrete creep and shrinkage properties are variable.
Taking the difference between two variable numbers results in a value which has
an even greater variability; hence, prediction of gravity-induced horizontal
sideway is more of an estimate than the prediction of vertical shortening alone.
Based on the construction sequence, time step, elastic, creep, shrinkage, and
foundation settlement analysis, predictions of the Burj Dubai tower gravity-
induced horizontal sideway have been made.
[1] William F. Baker, D. Stanton Korista, and Lawrence C. Novak; “Engineering the World’s
Tallest – Burj Dubai”, Partner with Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, Director of
Structural/Civil Engineering with Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, Director of Engineered
Buildings with the Portland Cement Association
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/
[3] http://www.aboutcivil.org/
[4] http://www.burjkhalifa.ae/
[5] http://www.som.com/
[6] http://www.archinomy.com
[7] http://www.skyscraperlist.com
[9] Brief on the Construction Planning of the Burj Dubai Project…………………… Ahmad
Abdelrazaq /Executive Vice President, Highrise Building Team, Samsung Engineering &
Construction