Delivering Better Oral Health
Delivering Better Oral Health
Delivering Better Oral Health
Public Health England’s mission is to protect and improve the nation’s health and to address
inequalities through working with national and local government, the NHS, industry and the
voluntary and community sector. PHE is an operationally autonomous executive agency of the
Department of Health.
Figures 4.1 and 4.2 reproduced from The Scientific Basis of Oral Health Education
(7th edition), with kind permission of Dr R S Levine and BDJ Books.
Contents
Foreword
It is well recognised that oral health has an important role in the general health and
well‑being of individuals and it is of concern that significant inequalities in oral health
exist across England.
The risk factors for many general health conditions are common to those that affect oral
health, namely smoking, alcohol misuse and a poor diet. It is therefore important that all
clinical teams make every contact count and support patients to make healthier choices.
By doing this not only will patients’ oral health benefit but their general health will be at
lower risk as well. Clinical dental teams therefore have an important role in advising their
patients about how they can make choices that improve and maintain both their dental
and general health.
Public Health England is pleased to provide this third edition of the prevention toolkit for
clinical teams. Current evidence has been reviewed and used to revise and develop the
previous edition.
I am sure this key document will allow all patients to benefit from modern preventive
treatments and improved methods of self-care. It should be used by the whole dental team
to ensure that all patients have equity of access to improved preventive advice and care.
Publication of ‘Delivering better oral health A further benefit has been the increased
– an evidence-based toolkit for prevention’ training of DCPs to support preventive
in 2007 led to a range of positive changes activity in practices. This is to be encouraged
that have increased the likelihood of people and runs in alignment with the principles
in England benefiting from improved oral of the dental contract reform programme
health. The guidance states the minimum which is focussing dental services towards
concentrations of fluoride in toothpaste a more preventive approach. This toolkit
to control caries and prompted several is an enabling document which lists the
manufacturers to reformulate their children’s evidence-informed messages which allows
toothpaste to a more effective level for caries them to be given consistently.
control. Coupled with clear advice about The toolkit also supported a new approach
twice daily brushing, this is likely to have whereby all patients, regardless of perceived
reduced caries activity among our very young risk level, were given preventive advice and
children. Guidance regarding the important offered preventive treatment. This serves to
role of fluoride varnish as part of clinical establish new social norms for better home
activity to control caries has led to a large care and recognises the fact that not all new
increase in the number of primary care teams disease can be anticipated so all patients can
applying this routinely and regularly to their benefit from advice and support. With 52%
child patients and to adults at higher risk. The of adults and 70% of children contacting a
simple item of advice that patients should spit dentist in every 24 month period the power of
out after brushing instead of rinsing away the the messages that dental clinical teams can
fluoride in their toothpaste has been widely have is considerable.
broadcast and should lead to lower caries
levels among children, adolescents and The toolkit has informed commissioners and
adults. allowed contracts to be developed which
encourage preventive activity. It has also been
All of this is good news and large numbers of useful in informing other health, education
primary care teams have commented about and social care work partners so that better
how useful the toolkit has been to ensure daily care can be brought into a variety of
that consistent advice is given as part of settings.
preventively orientated treatment plans. The
document has also ensured that other health This third edition continues to support these
and social care partners are aware of the positive effects and will be accompanied by
correct preventive messages and this has versions which will help patients to better
improved coherence between dental teams understand the preventive messages. The
and other agencies. summary tables have been reviewed and
revised, particularly the table referring to
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 3
Jenny Godson
Lead for oral health improvement
Many dental teams have asked for clear This toolkit is not the result of multiple
guidance about the advice they should give systematic review processes, rather a
and the actions they should take to be sure pragmatic and progressive approach was
they are doing the best for their patients taken towards the original collation of the
in preventing disease. There is currently a available evidence and applied in revisions
drive for greater emphasis on prevention for each new edition. The steering group
of ill-health and reduction of inequalities of conferred with leaders in the field and
health by the giving of advice, provision of established core messages and actions for
support to change behaviour and application which evidence had revealed a preventive
of evidence-informed actions. It is important benefit. Relevant papers were assessed
that the whole dental team, as well as for the detail and strength of evidence they
other healthcare workers, give consistent revealed, then statements were refined to
messages and that those messages are up ensure the wording correctly reflected the
to date and correct. conclusions derived. The published papers
that gave the highest level of evidence
Recent thinking suggests that all patients available are provided as references to
should be given the benefit of advice and support each statement (and can be found
support to change behaviour regarding in section 11). In many instances intelligence
their general and dental health, not just was drawn from a range of studies or reviews
those thought to be ‘at risk’. This guide and statements were derived from the totality
lists the advice and actions that should be of the resulting evidence
provided for all patients to maintain good
oral health. For those patients about whom The information displayed in the model is
there is greater concern (eg, those with supported by evidence of varying levels of
medical conditions, those with evidence strength. Where the evidence level is weak
of active disease and those for whom the this does not mean that the intervention
provision of reparative care is problematic) does not work but simply that the current
there is guidance about increasing the evidence supporting it is not of the highest
intensity of generally applied actions. quality. Each piece of advice or suggested
intervention is presented with an evidence
A number of well-respected experts have grade. This represents the highest grade of
come together to produce this document evidence that currently exists for the advice or
which aims to provide practical, evidence- intervention listed in the model.
based guidance to help clinical teams
to promote oral health and prevent oral
disease in their patients. It is intended for use
throughout primary dental care.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 5
For this new edition a symbol that indicates good practice has been added to statements for
which specific evidence is not available but which make practical sense. This is shown as GP
✔.
There is an intention to re-classify the evidence in the next edition of the toolkit using the
GRADE system.
Section 1 Summary guidance for primary care teams
Diabetes Patients with diabetes should try to maintain good V For patients with diabetes:
diabetes control as they are •• Explain risk related to diabetes GP
✔
•• At greater risk of developing serious periodontal III
disease
•• Less likely to benefit from periodontal treatment if V
the diabetes is not well controlled
Advice to be given EB Professional intervention EB
Prevention of erosion/toothwear
No table could be provided as the evidence to support interventions to prevent toothwear is currently limited. Some tooth wear is a natural part
of ageing; thus at present evidence-based population advice on tooth wear, and particularly erosion, cannot be substantiated. Evidence from
studies to support preventive interventions for individuals with pathological wear is limited, but growing. Much of the available evidence to date
relates to associations and is largely limited to epidemiology, laboratory and in situ studies; thus, further research in this field is recommended.
The later chapter about erosion and toothwear describes possible causes and an overview of methods of management, which includes advice
about prevention of toothwear according to the need of individual patients.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 17
•• children between three and six years •• brushing is more effective with a small-
should use no more than a pea-sized headed toothbrush with medium-texture
amount of toothpaste bristles (ISO 20126: 2012), (V)
Fluorides are widely found in nature and in content, either naturally or artificially, is at the
foods such as tea, fish, beer and in some optimum level for dental health. In terms of
natural water supplies. The link between population coverage, the West Midlands is
fluoride in public water supplies and reduced the most extensively fluoridated area, followed
levels of caries was first documented early by parts of the North East of England.
in the last century. Since then fluoride has Consumers seeking information on fluoride
become more widely available, most notably levels in their water can obtain this from
in toothpaste and is widely recognised as their water supplier. Many water companies
having improved oral health in the UK. having an online function to allow consumers
There is abundant evidence that increasing to check this. This is particularly important
fluoride availability to individuals and where additional fluoride is being considered
communities is effective at reducing caries for young children.
levels. This can be achieved by a range of Information on how fluoride availability can be
methods but similar principles apply to all. increased on an individual basis to improve
Fluoride works topically in the main and is oral health now follows.
most effective if it is available multiple times
during the day. Higher concentrations of Milk fluoridation
fluoride provide better caries prevention
effects and vehicles which are parts of normal There are a few schemes in England which
life are more likely to be effective and avoid supply children with fluoridated milk at
increasing inequalities. When vehicles and school. They are provided in areas which are
concentrations of fluoride are considered not fluoridated and where levels of caries are
for caries control the only risk to health is high. Children should not take part if they
fluorosis, and this is only the case if young have fluoride tablets or fluoride rinse on a
children receive excess levels (see section 2). daily basis.
A balance has to be achieved whereby the
most benefit can be gained from this naturally
occurring substance, while at the same time Fluoride toothpaste
avoiding the risk of fluorosis.
Strong evidence shows that toothpastes
containing higher concentrations of fluoride
Water fluoridation are more effective at controlling caries. It is
clear that low fluoride toothpastes (those
Currently approximately 10% of England’s containing less than 1,000ppmF-) are
population, or about six million people, ineffective at controlling caries.
benefit from a water supply where the fluoride
20 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
A Cochrane systematic review of evidence The risk of fluorosis from ingesting too
stated that “There should be a balanced much fluoride are linked much more to the
consideration between the benefits of topical amount of toothpaste that is used, than to
fluorides in caries prevention and the risk of the concentration. Risks of aesthetically
the development of fluorosis” (Wong, 2010). challenging fluorosis to permanent incisors
This review focusses on mild or questionable are relevant only to ingestion of fluoride by
fluorosis and did not distinguish between this those under three years old. Calcification
and the more severe forms. Mild fluorosis is of the crowns of these teeth is complete by
not readily apparent to the affected individual 30 months. Risks of aesthetically challenging
or casual observer and often requires a fluorosis to premolars are only relevant to
trained specialist to detect it. those aged under six years as calcification
The review concluded that the evidence of the crowns of these teeth is complete by
about the risk of fluorosis from starting the this age.
use of fluoride toothpaste in children under A research study investigated the
12 months of age was weak, and for starting concentration and amount of toothpaste
between the age of 12 and 24 months was used by children aged one to two years. This
equivocal. It also stated that where the risk of showed that the ingestion of fluoride among
fluorosis is of particular concern, the fluoride children who used a large amount of paste
level of toothpaste for young children is could be as much as twenty times higher
recommended to be lower than 1,000ppm. than that for children who used only a small
However, for children considered to be at amount. In contrast there was only a four fold
high risk of tooth decay by their dentist, difference in the amount of fluoride ingested
the benefit to health of preventing decay between those who used a low fluoride
may outweigh the risk of fluorosis. In such toothpaste and those using one containing
circumstances, careful brushing by parents/ 1,450ppm. See figure 3.1
carers with toothpastes containing higher
levels of fluoride would be beneficial.
mg fluoride ingested
Fluoride concentration
Toothpastes containing less than 1,000ppmF- (low concentration) – limited/no protection against
decay
Brand
Blanx
Advance whitening
Intensive Stain Removal
Sensitive
White Shock
Boots
Smile Kids 0-2
Co-operative
LIDL
Dentalux for kids 0-6
Oral B
Stages – Berry Bubble
Healthier eating advice should routinely be recommendation that in adults and children
given to patients to promote good oral and the intake of free sugars should not exceed
general health. Key dietary messages to 10% of total energy and a conditional
prevent dental caries are summarised below. recommendation of a further reduction to
The main message is to reduce both the below 5% of total energy.
amount and frequency of consuming foods The Scientific Advisory Committee on
and drinks that have added sugar. Added Nutrition, a committee of independent
sugar is defined as sugars or syrups added to experts who advise the government on
foods and drinks by the manufacturer, cook nutrition issues, are currently reviewing the
or consumer, plus sugars present in honey, evidence on sugars and other carbohydrates
syrups, fruit juices and fruit concentrates. in diet as part of their report ‘Carbohydrates
It does not include sugars found in whole and health’. This will include evaluating the
fresh fruit and vegetables and those naturally evidence on oral health as well as other
present in milk and milk products. health outcomes. A draft report is expected
to be published for consultation on 26
Dietary advice to prevent dental June 2014. The healthier eating guidance in
caries ‘Delivering better oral health’ will be updated
in the light of this publication.
Consensus recommendations advocate the
following to prevent caries: Most added sugars in the diet are contained
•• the amount and frequency of in processed and manufactured foods and
consumption of sugars should be drinks. Consumers should check labels
reduced carefully.
•• avoid sugar-containing foods and drinks Potentially cariogenic foods and drinks
at bedtime include:
•• added sugars should provide less than •• sugared soft drinks
10% of total energy in the diet or 60g per •• sugar and chocolate confectionery
person per day whichever is the lesser.
•• cakes and biscuits
Note that for young children this will be
around 30g per day (one teaspoon of •• buns, pastries, fruit pies
sugar equates to approximately 5-6g) •• sponge puddings and other puddings
•• fresh fruit juices (ONE 150ml glass of Stephan’s curve illustrates why the frequency
fresh fruit juice can count towards ‘five a of intake of sugars is particularly relevant
day’) for caries. Figure 4.1 below illustrates how
demineralisation of tooth surfaces occurs
•• sugared, milk-based beverages after a sugar intake and the subsequent drop
•• sugar-containing alcoholic drinks in pH that takes place in the mouth as oral
•• dried fruits bacteria convert sugar to acid. This process
stops as the buffering action of saliva takes
•• syrups and sweet sauces place and is more rapid in the presence of
fluoride. When sugar intakes are spaced
It is important to recognise that honey, fruit some hours apart there is a good opportunity
smoothies, fresh fruit juice and dried fruit all for remineralisation, which is also more
contain cariogenic sugars. effective in the presence of fluoride. Saliva
production is stimulated at mealtimes and
much reduced during sleep.
The impact of frequent sugar intakes are The eatwell plate is a key policy tool that
illustrated in Stephan’s curve in figure 4.2. defines the government’s recommendations
In this case sugar intakes are experienced on a healthy diet. It makes healthy eating
on many occasions during the day so easier to understand by giving a visual
demineralisation occurs more often and the representation of the types and proportions
time between drops in pH is not long enough of foods needed for a healthy, balanced diet.
for effective remineralisation to take place. The eatwell plate shows the types and
proportions of the main food groups that we
General good dietary practice should eat as part of a healthy, balanced diet:
guidelines •• plenty of fruit and vegetables (at least five
portions of a variety every day)
Key facts for eating well
•• plenty of starchy foods, such as bread,
Below are some of the main healthy eating rice, potatoes, and pasta, choosing
messages aimed at helping people make wholegrain varieties and potatoes with
healthier dietary choices. their skins on whenever possible
The two most important elements of a •• some milk and dairy foods
healthy diet are: •• some meat, fish, eggs, beans and other
•• eating the right amount of food relative non-dairy sources of protein
to how active a person is to be a healthy
weight Foods and drinks high in fat, sugar and/or salt
•• eating a range of foods in line with the should be consumed infrequently and in small
eatwell plate amounts.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 35
Key messages for a healthier diet doing this but still don’t. Eating five plus
portions a day can be easy. A portion of fruit
Base meals on starchy foods and vegetables is 80g.
Try to choose wholegrain varieties, and Eat more fish
potatoes with their skins on, whenever Two portions of fish, including a portion of
possible – as wholegrain foods and the skins oily fish, eg salmon, trout, sardines, mackerel,
on potatoes contain more fibre and other sardines, pilchards, herrings, kipper, eels,
nutrients than white or refined starchy foods. whitebait and fresh tuna, should be eaten
We also digest wholegrain foods more slowly each week. The choice can be from fresh,
so they can help make us feel full for longer. frozen or canned – but canned and smoked
Eat lots of fruit and vegetables fish can be high in salt. The fish count as oily
fish when they’re canned, fresh or frozen.
At least five portions of a variety of fruit
However, fresh tuna is an oily fish but canned
and vegetables should be eaten every day;
tuna doesn’t count as oily. This is because
different fruit and vegetables contain different
when it’s canned these fats are reduced to
combinations of fibre, vitamins and other
levels similar to white fish. So, canned tuna
nutrients. Eating more fruit and vegetables
is a healthy choice for most people, but it
may help to reduce the risk of the two main
doesn’t have the same benefits as eating
killers in this country – heart disease and
oily fish.
cancer. Most people know they should be
36 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Cut down on saturated fat a stroke than people with normal blood
To stay healthy we need some fat in our diets. pressure.
There are two main types of fat: Drink plenty of water
•• saturated fat – having too much can We should be drinking about six to eight
increase the amount of cholesterol in glasses (1.2lts) of water, or other fluids, every
the blood, which increases the chance day to stop us getting dehydrated.
of developing heart disease. Foods
There are specific dietary recommendations
containing this include: fatty meat, pâté,
for infants and young children:
meat pies, sausages, hard cheese, butter,
lard, full fat milk, and biscuits, cakes and www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-
pastry baby/Pages/services-support-for-parents.
•• unsaturated fat – having unsaturated aspx#close and click on the babies and
fat instead of saturated fat does not toddlers tab
increase blood cholesterol levels. Good Source of key messages:
sources include: vegetable oils (such as www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-
sunflower, rapeseed and olive oil), oily eatwell-plate-how-to-use-it-in-promotional-
fish, avocados, nuts and seeds material
Department of Health, Change4Life:
However, it is important not to increase the
www.nhs.uk/change4life
amount of total fat consumed because eating
too much will increase energy intake and if
greater than energy used may lead to weight Changing the diet
gain.
The diet modification approach should be
Cut down on the amount and frequency of
used in conjunction with actions to increase
sugary food intake
fluoride availability (as outlined in section 1).
As stated at the beginning of this section,
However, lowering the amount and frequency
consensus recommendations in order to
of sugars consumed will have wider health
reduce dental caries advocate reducing the
benefits, preventing weight gain and obesity
amount and frequency of foods and drinks
which in turn will reducing the risk of heart
containing added sugars.
disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers.
Increased intake of sugars can lead to
When giving dietary advice to reduce
increased energy intake and if greater than
consumption of sugars it is essential to
expenditure to weight gain.
assess the overall pattern of eating to
Eat less salt – no more than 6g a day establish the following information:
Three-quarters (75%) of the salt we eat •• the number of intakes of food and drinks
comes from processed food, such as some per day
breakfast cereals, soups, sauces, bread,
•• the number of intakes that contain added
biscuits and ready meals. Eating too much
sugars and how many were consumed
salt can raise blood pressure. People with between normal mealtimes
high blood pressure are three times more
likely to develop heart disease or have
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 37
3.30 pm Banana
7 pm Packet of Malteasers
TIME DAY 1
40 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
TIME DAY 2
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 41
TIME DAY 3
42 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Table 5.1 List of ten most prescribed liquids and suspensions during 2013*
BNF name Total number of prescriptions**
Lactulose_Soln 3.1g-3.7g/5ml 3,785,249
Ensure Plus_Milkshake Style Liq(10 Flav) 1,589,278
Amoxicillin_Oral Susp 125mg/5ml S/F 1,320,513
Fortisip Bottle_Liq (8 Flav) 1,161,414
Morph Sulf_Oral Soln 10mg/5ml 778,880
Amoxicillin_Oral Susp 125mg/5ml 715,340
Gaviscon Advance_Liq (Aniseed)(Forum) 699,684
Gaviscon Advance_Liq (Aniseed) (Reckitt) 672,413
Oramorph_Oral Soln 10mg/5ml 648,564
Paracet_Oral Susp Paed 120mg/5ml S/F 617,286
*NHSBSA BNF National prescribing data at presentation level (January 2013 to December 2013). NHSBSA
Copyright 2014
**Data based on what is prescribed in England and may include items prescribed in England that have been dispensed
in England, Wales or Scotland.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 43
1. P
revention of gingivitis. Gingivitis, if not Oral hygiene should be carefully tailored to an
controlled, will lead to periodontitis in the individual’s needs and preferences:
majority of individuals •• advise and instruct good plaque removal
2. E
arly detection of periodontitis using the from, and just into, the gingival crevice
the basic periodontal examination (BPE) including interdental areas
3. M
anaging risk factors that either increase •• advise replacement of toothbrushes
regularly, every one to three months
the risk of developing periodontitis or
complicate its successful care •• encourage daily interdental cleaning
before toothbrushing. Since toothbrushing
4. S
upportive periodontal therapy
but not interdental cleaning is a routine
(maintenance) for patients treated for
for the majority of people, carrying
periodontitis
out interdental oral hygiene first may
link these activities and help develop
regularity
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 45
•• there are many types of interdental aids Behaviour change (see also section 10)
and personal preference will dominate
Current research shows that brief behaviour
choice of any individual type. However,
change interventions can improve plaque
in general, people with, or treated for,
control more than traditional oral hygiene
periodontitis will have larger interdental
instruction alone. These approaches
spaces due to tissue loss and interdental
encourage the patient to understand how
brushes will be more effective than
dental floss or tape. The size of the oral hygiene might be beneficial to them,
interdental brush should be a snug fit in to develop confidence in their oral hygiene
the interdental space. Therefore many abilities, to set targets for change that they
patients with periodontitis will require feel able to achieve and to challenge their
more than one size of brush for smaller perceived barriers to performance. Some of
and larger spaces (eg, between anterior these methods address common barriers
and posterior teeth) to the development of an effective oral
hygiene routine which may not otherwise
•• while there is evidence that some be addressed during traditional oral hygiene
powered toothbrushes (with a rotation,
instruction.
oscillation action) can be more effective
for plaque control than manual tooth
brushes, it is probably more important 2. Early detection of periodontal
that the brush, manual or powered, is disease
used effectively twice daily. Thorough
cleaning may take at least two minutes. The BPE is well known and quick to use
Brushes should have a small-head with (British Society of Periodontology, 2011).
medium-texture bristles and be changed Recently, the BPE has been adapted for early
regularly (every one to three months). detection of periodontal disease in children
•• time spent brushing may be a useful as it is recognised that periodontitis can
guide for patients. Assessing efficacy in start in children and adolescents but is hard
the dental practice is better based on to detect without probing (British Society of
gingival inflammation levels Periodontology, 2012) Therefore, all children
•• the primary emphasis should be for from the age of seven years and upwards
patients to develop good interdental should be examined with modifications of
plaque removal and tooth brushing. the BPE. The summary guidance indicates
Although there is some evidence that how to do this in two age bands: seven to 11
fluoride toothpaste containing triclosan years and 12 to 17 years.
and a co-polymer, reduces plaque
and gingival inflammation more than
toothpastes that contain fluoride only,
the clinical relevance of this reduction is
unclear (Riley and Lamont, 2013)
•• for patients with limited cognitive and
motor skills (eg, children and adults with
special needs, frail older people) consider
toothbrush adaptations and additional
support
46 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
3. Managing risk factors •• patients who are not ready or willing
to stop may wish to consider using a
Smoking licensed nicotine containing product to
help reduce smoking. The health benefits
Smoking (and smokeless tobacco products) to reducing are unclear but those who
has a profound effect on the risk of achieve this are more likely to stop
developing periodontitis but also impairs the smoking in the future
treatment response. As a result, people with
periodontitis who continue to smoke are more For more details see section 7
likely to lose teeth than non-smokers:
Diabetes
•• checking smoking status for all patients is
important. Since smoking status changes Diabetes increases the risk of developing
with time (non-smokers starting to smoke periodontitis and also may impair the
and people who quit relapsing), review treatment response of periodontitis. While it
this at oral health assessments is true that well controlled diabetes is not a
risk factor, many people oscillate between
•• for patients interested in quitting following levels of control. Therefore, it is preferable
brief advice by the dental team, signpost
to assume an increased risk for periodontal
to local stop smoking services as this is
disease for anyone who has diabetes.
the most effective approach to quitting
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 47
I am managing the periodontal health of and I understand they attend your diabetes clinic. As
you know, diabetes can increase the risk of periodontal disease and compromise treatment,
particularly with unstable glycaemic control (typically HbA1c more than 7.0%). I would therefore
be grateful for your advice on their diabetes control and recent HbA1c levels would be helpful.
Thank you in advance for your help
Yours sincerely
Dentist details
Copy: Patient’s name
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 51
Tobacco use in England continues to kill healthy disease-free life (Tsai et al., 2009,
more than 70,000 people every year, nearly Johnson and Bain, 2000). Tobacco use, both
1,900 of these people die from oral cancer smoking and chewing tobacco, seriously
(The Office of National Statistics, 2013). affects general and oral health. At least 50
Action by dental teams to reduce tobacco different diseases are caused by tobacco
use will help to improve dental treatment use including various types of cancers,
outcomes, promote oral and general health ischaemic heart disease, strokes and chronic
and ultimately save lives. lung disease. The most significant effects
The following are key recommendations of tobacco use on the oral cavity are oral
made in the related publication ‘Smoke free cancers and pre-cancers, increased severity
and smiling’, those relevant to dental teams and extent of periodontal diseases, tooth loss
are also reproduced within this document for and poor wound-healing post operatively
ease of reference: (Johnson and Bain, 2000). Smokers are
seven to ten times more likely to suffer from
•• people who use tobacco receive advice oral cancer than people who have never
to stop and are offered support to do so smoked (Warnakulasuriya, Sutherland and
with a referral to their local stop smoking Scully, 2005) and in long-term regular users
service of smokeless tobacco this risk is more than
•• dental schools, postgraduate deaneries 11 times that of a non-user (Prabhakaran
and other providers and commissioners and Mani, 2002). Within England, mortality
of dental teaching should ensure that from oral cancer (ICD10 codes: C00-06/
tobacco cessation training is available C09-10/C12-14) was 1,883 in 2011 (males,
and meets national standards 1,221; females, 662) (The Office of National
Statistics, 2013).
•• dental teams are routinely proactive in
engaging users of tobacco While the impact of tobacco use on health
is alarming, the benefits of stopping are
•• commissioning bodies implement substantial, particularly for people under 35
appropriate measures that support the years of age, who if they quit successfully
above recommendations will have a normal life expectancy (Doll and
Bradford Hill, 1954, Jha et al., 2013). As many
Smoking remains the leading cause of of the adverse effects of tobacco use on the
preventable death and disease in England oral tissues are reversible, this provides a
and has a significant impact on health useful means of motivating patients to stop.
inequalities and ill health. Other forms of
tobacco or ‘smokeless tobacco’ (which Whether smoked or chewed, nicotine from
are especially prevalent among the South tobacco is highly addictive. Consequently
Asian population) also impact on leading a stopping is a major challenge for most users.
52 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
The majority of cigarette smokers report strategy has been to establish a nationwide
that they would like to stop, and make many network of local stop smoking services. These
attempts to quit (West and Brown, 2012). services provide evidence-based treatment
While some people (less dependent smokers) and support for users of tobacco. Cessation/
seem capable of stopping without any quit rates among smokers who use these
support, the majority of people would benefit services are substantially higher than among
from using smoking cessation medications those who only receive advice from primary
and the support of their local stop smoking care professionals (West and Brown, 2012).
service. This is especially true for people who Carr and Ebbert’s most recent Cochrane
are more dependent on tobacco (Department systematic review (2012) demonstrated that
of Health, 2010). tobacco cessation interventions (including
The latest Adult Dental Health Survey (2009) smoking cessation) were beneficial and
identified that 61% of dentate adults in England increased quit rates when compared to no
reported they attended the dentist for a regular care from an oral health professional within
check-up, 10% on an occasional basis and a dental setting. This is the first systematic
27% when they had trouble with their teeth review to demonstrate oral health professionals
(The Health and Social Care Information Centre, increasing quit rates within the dental setting
2011). Dental teams are therefore in a unique (Carr and Ebbert, 2012).
position to provide opportunistic advice to a A key priority is therefore to ensure that
large number of ‘healthy’ people who may use primary care professionals, such as members
tobacco and need professional support to stop of a dental team, engage users of tobacco,
(Chestnutt, 1999). Thirteen percent of women advise that their local stop smoking service
continue to smoke during pregnancy and many provides the best chance of stopping, and
of these women attend for free dental treatment provide a referral to those services.
(The Health and Social Care Information Centre, The role of the dental team in supporting
2012). Dental teams working in the primary people who use tobacco
care, salaried services and in hospitals also
have a potentially important role to play in In the vast majority of cases, dental teams
cessation. Surveys indicate that dental teams will only be involved in delivering very brief
have an increasingly positive attitude towards advice (VBA) to tobacco users. Use of the
tobacco cessation and are becoming more following pathway will increase the chance
actively involved in the care pathway (John, of a successful quit attempt and reduce time
Thomas and Richards, 2003). of delivery.
All health professionals share an ethical The National Centre for Smoking Cessation
duty of care to provide evidence-based and Training (NCSCT) has developed a
interventions. Although progress has been simple form of advice designed to be used
made, with many dental teams routinely opportunistically in less than 30 seconds in
recording information on tobacco use and almost any consultation with a tobacco user.
advising users to quit, there are dental teams This is VBA and there are three elements to it:
who do not routinely offer tobacco cessation 1. Establishing and recording smoking
advice to their patients. status (ASK)
Reducing tobacco use is a key priority for 2. Advising on the personal benefits of
the NHS (Department of Health, 2010) and quitting (ADVISE)
a major part of the government’s tobacco
3. Offering help (ACT).
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 53
nicotine. Smoking is highly addictive, largely For more information on harm reduction
because it delivers nicotine very quickly to please access the NICE guidance PH45
the brain and this makes stopping smoking ‘Tobacco: harm-reduction approaches
difficult. Licensed nicotine-containing to smoking’: guidance.nice.org.uk/PH45/
products are an effective way of reducing Guidance/pdf/English
the harm from tobacco for both the person The VBA process can be found here:
smoking and those around them. It is safer http://elearning.ncsct.co.uk/vba-stage_2
to use licensed nicotine-containing products To date, over 25,000 people have viewed
than to smoke. People who reduce the the promotional film and over 28,000 have
amount they smoke without supplementing accessed the training module. Dental health
their nicotine intake with a licensed nicotine professionals including hygienists, therapists,
product will compensate by drawing smoke nurses, practice managers, receptionists, and
deeper into their lungs, exhaling later and dentists have all completed the module.
taking more puffs. It is recommended that
those individuals reducing the number of Further information section of the VBA
cigarettes they smoke use a licenced nicotine module makes specific reference to ‘Making
containing product to give them some every contact count’ and includes a link to
‘therapeutic’ nicotine which is more likely to this document (Every contact counts, 2012).
reduce the amount that they smoke and to Published in January 2012, the document
improve their health. Nicotine replacement emphasised the importance of healthcare
therapy (NRT) products have been professionals using every patient contact as
demonstrated in trials to be safe to use for at an opportunity to maintain or improve that
least five years. There is reason to believe that individual’s mental and physical health and
lifetime use of licensed nicotine-containing wellbeing, including tobacco, diet, physical
products will be considerably less harmful activity and alcohol.
than smoking. Training and support for dental teams in
Licensed nicotine-containing products are tobacco cessation
available on prescription, over the counter As in any area of clinical and preventive
at pharmacies and on general sale at many practice, appropriate training is essential
retail outlets. to enable dental teams to deliver tobacco
If someone indicates that they are interested cessation support and advice. The oral
in trying a harm reduction approach to their pathology associated with tobacco use and,
smoking then you should inform them that to a more limited extent, tobacco cessation
the health benefits from smoking reduction is taught in detail to undergraduate dental
are unclear. However, advise them that if they students. Basic training may expose other
reduce their smoking now they are more likely members of the dental team to other teaching
to stop smoking in the future. Explain that on tobacco cessation.
this is particularly true if they use licensed
nicotine-containing products to help reduce
the amount they smoke.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 55
Case study. Teaching smoking- How can dental teams engage with users
of tobacco?
cessation to aspiring members of the
dental team Local stop smoking services have helped
many thousands of people to successfully
The General Dental Council, in its
stop using tobacco. In 2011-12 over 400,000
recently published guidance on learning
people, 49% of attendees, stopped by using
outcomes required for registration, states
these services. Indeed, smokers are up to
that members of the dental team should
four times more likely to stop if they attend
be able to communicate appropriately,
these services and use medication, than by
effectively and sensitively with patients
trying to quit on their own without support
about smoking (General Dental
and medication (West and Brown, 2012). As a
Council, 2012).
result, policy guidance to health professionals
At Cardiff University Dental School, now emphasises the importance of referring
teaching smoking-cessation counselling all who wish to stop using tobacco to their
is a vehicle for providing undergraduate local stop smoking services for specialist
dental, dental hygiene and dental therapy assistance and support (National Institute for
students with a number of skills. Changes Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006):
in smoking patterns are used to teach
•• the best outcomes occur when those
epidemiology. Psychological theories
who are interested in stopping take-up
underlying behaviour change are taught
a referral for specialist support. Timing
didactically and students also learn why
is crucially important: the quicker the
people smoke, what is necessary to
contact by a local stop smoking service,
motivate behaviour change, and the impact
the greater the motivation and interest
of addictive behaviour. Junior students
in the individual. Dental patients, who
use role-play techniques to learn how
express a desire to stop, signposted
to raise the topic of smoking-cessation
directly into their local stop smoking
in a sensitive manner, enabling them to
services receive the best opportunity to
develop their communication skills. A
stop smoking. The dental team’s role is
self-directed learning exercise is used
vital in giving the patient information on
to familiarise student dental hygienists
how to contact their local stop smoking
with resources that are available to help
service. It just takes 30 seconds and
patients who are considering stopping
can give patients the motivation to seek
smoking and where to direct those patients
professional help which will increase their
who want to quit. An awareness of the
chances of quitting
different forms in which patients from
different ethnic backgrounds may use •• dental teams and the local stop smoking
tobacco provides a focus for discussion services can work collaboratively in
of how cultural practices may impact on a variety of ways. As a first step, it is
oral health. Assessment of knowledge important that all members of a dental
and competency in this area are tested team are fully aware of the services
using objective structured assessments, offered locally and of how these operate.
involving the use of actors to play the role Arranging a meeting with a representative
of smokers, with different attitudes to using of a local service could provide a useful
tobacco. opportunity for dental teams to learn
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 57
about the service and the best ways of is effective in helping patients who chew
signposting dental patients to it tobacco to stop. Current NICE guidance
•• teams working together provide much (National Institute for Health and Clinical
more support to the patient in stopping Excellence, 2012), regarding smokeless
smoking. It is important that no matter tobacco users in South Asian communities,
who makes the referral, the patient’s recommends dental teams:
progress in stopping is assessed and Ask people if they use smokeless tobacco,
is recorded in their clinical notes at using the names that the various products
each subsequent dental appointment. are known by locally. If necessary, show
Stopping tobacco use can be a difficult them a picture of what the products look like,
process and is often associated with using visual aids. (This may be necessary if
a range of unpleasant, short-term the person does not speak English well or
withdrawal symptoms, some of which, does not understand the terms being used).
such as ulcers, directly affect the oral Figure 7.2 gives an example of a resource
cavity. Reassurance and advice from that could be used, with details of each
dental team members may help patients product on the reverse. This resource also
deal more effectively with these problems, provides information on shisha (water pipe
thereby increasing their chances of top left image on resource below) use. Shisha
quitting successfully is not a smokeless tobacco product and
•• when tobacco users express a desire can be as damaging as smoking cigarettes
to stop their dental team can offer or chewing any of the smokeless tobacco
advice and support. This advice and products listed. Users of shisha, who wish
support should only be delivered by to stop smoking, should be referred to the
dental staff trained to the current NCSCT stop smoking service in the same way as
Training Standard and preferably are other users of tobacco. Advise the patient of
fully NCSCT certified; having passed the the health risks (eg, the risk of lung cancer,
knowledge (Stage 1) and practice (Stage respiratory illness and periodontal disease)
2) assessments (National Centre for (Akl et al., 2010) associated with tobacco use
Smoking Cessation Training, 2014). In this and advise them to stop. Where services
case, as with any provider of services, exist locally, refer people who want to quit to
continued commitment to governance local specialist tobacco cessation service.
and performance monitoring is required Record the outcome in the patient’s notes.
to ensure that service users continue VBA (ask, advise, act) is the same method
to be provided with the best available you would apply to smokers or smokeless
intervention tobacco users.
Figure 7.2 Niche tobacco resource developed by Bradford & Airedale stop smoking service
Ensuring that referral pathways are quick •• all dental teams should signpost and
and easy to use is essential if systematic offer VBA within their current contractual
local delivery of VBA and referrals are arrangements. In a small number of
to be achieved. Secondary care is one cases, dependent upon local need,
setting that has often been regarded as a dental teams may be commissioned
‘missed opportunity’ when it comes to the to provide a specialist support service
identification and referral of smokers. The (taking patients through a full quit attempt)
NCSCT has developed a national electronic
referral system in a hospital setting (www. Further details regarding the commissioning
ncsct.co.uk/publication_national-referral- of smoking cessation services within dental
system.php). This resulted in a 600% increase teams can be found in the related document
in referrals to local stop-smoking services in ‘Smokefree and smiling’ (second edition) or
the pilot site and the system has now been from local stop smoking services.
adopted by 17 trusts.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 59
Case Study. Collaborative working ethnic minority groups. Access to the service
is either direct, or through referral by a health
between GDP and local stop smoking
professional. To date, the majority of referrals
service
have been through GPs and practice nurses.
“Our dental team was trained by NHS However, other primary care professionals,
Bradford & Airedale stop smoking service such as dentists and pharmacists, are
in November 2012 to be able to conduct potentially very important sources of suitable
VBA and brief interventions with our referrals to these services. Details of the local
patients regarding smoking and tobacco stop smoking services can be obtained from
use. We enjoyed the training and since the smoking helpline (0800 169 0 169) or by
then feel more confident when asking and visiting www.gosmokefree.nhs.uk
advising patients about their tobacco. It’s a
quick system that enables us to refer on to
local stop smoking services to support our
Supporting materials and
patients to quit. At our dental practice we resources
recognise smoking and tobacco cessation
is a team effort and we all have a role to •• The National Centre for Smoking
play. The systematic approach we have Cessation and Training (NCSCT)
been trained to deliver (Ask, Advise, Assist) The NCSCT was established in 2009 by
means we all give consistent messages the Department of Health to develop and
to the patient. Patients seem relaxed with integrate national programmes of training and
our approach that is professional and assessment to improve the overall quality of
confident. It’s been great to make the behavioural support delivered to smokers.
connection with the local Stop Smoking The NCSCT website (www.ncsct.co.uk) offers
team, now we know they are always at resources for commissioners, managers and
hand to give advice and support to our practitioners in addition to these courses:
team whenever we need it.”
1. NCSCT Training and Assessment
Waqar Mohammed – principal dentist Programme: Nearly 17,000 people have
Sahdia Fazil – practice manager registered with the NCSCT. Over 14,600
have passed the knowledge (Stage 1)
assessment and of these more than
7,500 have gained full NCSCT certification
Stop smoking services by also passing the practice (Stage 2)
assessment.
The majority of stop smoking services offer 2. Face-to-face courses in providing
one-to-one treatment and group sessions, behavioural support to smokers: 1,200
delivered by trained advisors on a weekly practitioners from 100 PCTs have been
basis, normally over an eight-week period. trained on these courses.
Behavioural support and access to stop
smoking medications are provided, focusing Online module on ‘Very brief advice on
on preventing relapse in the early stages of smoking’ www.ncsct.co.uk/VBA. 20,000
quitting. In addition, specialist advisors often people have viewed the promotional film and
provide support for priority groups, such as 7,500 have taken the formal assessment
pregnant smokers, young people, people attached to the training module.
with mental health problems and certain
60 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
•• ‘Choosing better oral health: an oral Nicotine inhaled from smoking tobacco is
health plan for England’, Department of highly addictive. But it is primarily the toxins
Health, 2003. and carcinogens in tobacco smoke – not
Linked directly to the broader public health the nicotine – that cause illness and death.
agenda, this document outlines approaches The best way to reduce these illnesses
needed to promote oral health and reduce and deaths is to stop smoking. In general,
inequalities across England. A key priority stopping in one step (sometimes called
is the need for dental teams to become ‘abrupt quitting’) offers the best chance
more actively engaged in tobacco cessation of lasting success (see NICE guidance on
activity. smoking cessation). However, there are other
ways of reducing the harm from smoking,
•• ‘Brief interventions and referral for even though this may involve continued use
smoking cessation’ (PH1), NICE, 2006 of nicotine.
This guidance is for GPs and other This guidance is about helping people,
professionals working in local health services, particularly those who are highly dependent
pharmacies and dental practices – and NHS on nicotine, who may:
hospitals.
1. Not be able (or do not want) to stop
Monitoring systems should be set up so that smoking in one step.
health professionals know whether or not
their patients smoke. 2. Want to stop smoking, without
necessarily giving up nicotine.
•• Tobacco and oral health: A survey of
dental education and training in tobacco 3. Not be ready to stop smoking, but want
issues, NICE, 2007 to reduce the amount they smoke.
in particular, the practical skills they need to Aveyard P, Begh R, Parsons A and West R,
deliver effective tobacco cessation. (2012). Brief opportunistic smoking cessation
•• ‘Proceedings of the 1st European interventions: a systematic review and meta-
workshop on tobacco use, prevention analysis to compare advice to quit and offer
and cessation for oral health of assistance. Addiction, 107, 1066-73.
Professionals’, published in Oral Health Carr A, Ebbert J. Interventions for tobacco
and Preventive Dentistry 2006; 4:1–77. cessation in the dental setting. Cochrane
This is a detailed report on a workshop that Database of Systematic Reviews 2006,
reviewed all aspects of tobacco use and Issue 1. Art. No.: CD005084. DOI:
cessation for oral health professionals. It 10.1002/14651858.CD005084.pub2.
includes papers on public health aspects of Chestnutt I (1999). What should we do about
tobacco control, an evaluation of tobacco patients who smoke? Dental Update, 26,
cessation in the dental surgery, cessation 227-231.
in dental and dental hygiene undergraduate
education, and cessation in continuing Department of Health (2010). Healthy Lives,
education for dentists and hygienists. A useful Healthy People: Our strategy for public health
tobacco cessation care pathway is also in England. London.
presented. Doll R and Bradford Hill A (1954). The
•• ‘Tobacco or oral health: an advocacy mortality of doctors in relation to their
guide for oral health professionals’, FDI smoking habits: a preliminary report. British
World Dental Press, 2005. Medical Journal, 328, 1529-33.
This guide, developed jointly by the FDI World Every Contact Counts (2012). Raising Health
Dental Federation and WHO, provides an Consciousness Using Brief Interventions.
overview of tobacco facts, discusses the www.everycontactcounts.co.uk/
role of the dental team in tobacco control, General Dental Council (2012). Preparing for
examines the role of advocacy, and provides practice – Dental team learning outcomes for
a number of recommendations on ways of registration, London, General Dental Council.
moving the tobacco control agenda forwards.
Health Development Agency (2003). Standard
Resource for use in dental for training in smoking cessation treatments.
surgeries London.
Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V,
www.gosmokefree.nhs.uk – a website that Rostron B, Thun M, Anderson RN, McAfee
includes information on local stop smoking T and Peto R (2013). 21st-century hazards
services and other smoking cessation leaflets of smoking and benefits of cessation in
and resources. the United States. New England Journal of
Medicine 368, 341-50.
References John J, Thomas D and Richards D (2003).
Smoking cessation interventions in the Oxford
Akl EA, Gaddam S, Gunukula SK, Honeine R,
region: changes in dentists’ attitudes and
Jaoude PA & Irani J (2010). The effects
reported practices 1996-2001. British Dental
of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health
Journal, 195, 270-275.
outcomes: a systematic review. International
Journal of Epidemiology, 39, 834-57.
62 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Johnson N and Bain C (2000). Tobacco and The Health and Social Care Information
oral disease. British Dental Journal, 189, Centre (2012). Statistics on Women’s
200-206. Smoking Status at Time of Delivery: England.
National Centre for Smoking Cessation Quarter 4, 2012/13.
Training (NCSCT), (2012). Very Brief Advice www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/
www.ncsct.co.uk/vba. health-and-lifestyles/nhs-stop-smoking-
services/statistics-on-nhs-stop-smoking-
National Centre for Smoking Cessation services-england-april-2009--march-2010
Training (NCSCT), (2014). Training Modules
http://www.ncsct.co.uk/training. The Office of National Statistics (2013).
Cancer Registration Statistics, England. 2011.
National Institute for Health and Clinical
www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/cancer-
Excellence (2006). Brief interventions and
statistics-registrations--england--series-mb1-/
referral for smoking cessation in primary care
no--42--2011/rft-main-tables.xls
and other settings: Public Health Intervention
Guidance no.1. London: National Institute for Tsai KY, Su CC, Lin YY, Chung JA and
Health and Clinical Excellence. Lian IeB (2009). Quantification of betel quid
National Institute for Health and Clinical chewing and cigarette smoking in oral
Excellence (2012). Tobacco: helping people of cancer patients. Community Dental & Oral
South Asian origin to stop using smokeless Epidemiology, 37, 555-61.
tobacco. London: National Institute for Health Warnakulasuriya KA, Sutherland G and
and Clinical Excellence. Scully C (2005). Tobacco, oral cancer and
National Institute for Health and Clinical treatment dependence. Oral Oncology, 41,
Excellence (2013). Tobacco: harm-reduction 244-260.
approaches to smoking In: Excellence, West R and Brown J (2012). Smoking and
National Institute for Health and Clinical Smoking Cessation in England 2011
Excellence. Public Health Intervention www.smokinginengland.info.
Guidance no.45. London.
Prabhakaran PS and Mani S (2002).
Epidemiology of oral cancer. Oral oncology.
Bangalore: Kidwai Memorial Institute of
Oncology.
Public Health England (2014). Smokefree
and Smiling – Helping Dental Patients to quit
tobacco – 2nd Edition.
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/
uploads/attachment_data/file/288835/
SmokeFree__Smiling_110314_FINALjw.pdf
The Health and Social Care Information
Centre (2011). Adult Dental Health Survey.
Adult dental health survey 2009. London.
www.hscic.gov.uk/pubs/
dentalsurveyfullreport09
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 63
Score Your
Questions 0 1 2 3 4 score
How often do Never Monthly 2-4 times 2-3 times 4+ times
you have a drink or less per per week per week
containing alcohol? month
How many units 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-9 10+
of alcohol do you
drink on a typical
day when you are
drinking?
How often have Never Less Monthly Weekly Daily or
you had 6 or more than almost
units if female, or 8 monthly daily
or more if male, on
a single occasion
in the last year?
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 67
Goodall CA, Crawford A, Macaskill S and Smith AJ, Hodgson RJ, Bridgeman K and
Welbury R, (2006). Assessment of hazardous Shepherd JP, (2003). A randomized controlled
drinking in general dental practice. Journal of trial of a brief intervention after alcohol-related
Dental Research; 85: 1219. facial injury. Addiction; 98: 43-52.
Health and Social Care Information Centre,
(2013). NHS Dental Statistics for England
– 2012-13: NHS Dental Statistics: 2012/13
www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?
productid=12370&q=dental+
attendance&topics=0%2fPrimary+care+
services&sort=Relevance&size=10&
page=1#top
HM Government, (2012). The Government’s
Alcohol Strategy. London, The Stationery
Office.
Hutchison IL, Magennis P, Shepherd JP and
Brown AE. The BAOMS UK survey of facial
injuries part 1: aetiology and the association
with alcohol consumption. British Journal of
Oral Maxillofacial Surgery; 36: 3-13.
Kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer FR, Campbell
F, Schlesinger C, Heather N, Saunders
JB, Burnand B, Pienaar ED. Effectiveness
of brief alcohol interventions in primary
care populations. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art.
No.: CD004148. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD004148.pub3. Effectiveness of brief
alcohol interventions in primary care
populations. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. CD004148.
La Vecchia C, Tavani A, Franceschi S, Levi F,
Corrao G and Negri E, (1997). Epidemiology
and prevention of oral cancer. Oral Oncology;
33: 302-312.
National Audit Office, Department of Health,
(2008). Reducing Alcohol Harm: health
services in England for alcohol misuse.
London, The Stationery Office.
Robb ND and Smith BG, (1990). Prevalence
of pathological tooth wear in patients with
chronic alcoholism. British Dental Journal;
169: 367-369.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 69
its chemical composition. There is likely to be guides the management of the condition
individual variation in response to the erosive for the practitioner (Bartlett, Ganss and
effects of acids. This may be due to a range Lussi, 2008).
of factors including the quantity and quality of 4. Seeking medical advice for management
saliva, features of the pellicle, individual habits of intrinsic sources of acid involving
with regard to acid availablity. Furthermore, reflux or eating disorders and/or the
oral swishing, frothing and retention may management of medications.
prolong the effect and overwhelm any
protective capacity of saliva. Current Advice that may be given to manage erosive
evidence suggests that if erosion is present in tooth wear for affected individuals. This is
pathological tooth wear, then fruit, and fruit- based on professional advice and evidence
based drinks, may be the most important from cross sectional studies of association or
extrinsic risk factors. The aetiological risk laboratory or in situ studies of erosion should
factors for mechanical tooth wear are listed in be tailored to individual patients and their
table 9.2. identified risks:
•• avoid frequent intake of acidic foods or
Professional action for high risk drinks
patients •• keep acidic drinks to mealtimes and limit
the number of fruit drinks (no more than
The most important preventive action
one a day) (Bartlett et al., 2011, Fung and
(secondary prevention) for an individual who
Messer, 2013)
has developed pathological tooth wear to
ensure that the potential source, or sources, •• use toothpaste containing at least
of wear are identified and removed and, 1,450ppmF twice daily (Lussi et al., 2006)
where possible, lifestyle is modified. It is also •• consider high fluoride toothpastes to
important to assess and record the condition protect enamel (5000ppm) (Austin et al.,
and enable patients to manage it with the 2010, Ren et al., 2011)
necessary expert help.
•• ensure toothpaste is low abrasive in
Professional actions that may be taken for nature (Macdonald et al., 2010)
patients who actions concern include the
following: •• do not brush immediately after eating or
drinking acidic food or drinks (Bartlett et
1. Sensitive investigation of general health al., 2011)
and diet as well as toothbrushing
behaviours to identify possible sources of •• do not brush immediately after vomiting
acid and wear. (for recurrent vomiters) (Milosevic, 1999,
Bartlett et al., 2013)
2. Provision of tailored, specific advice for
each individual patient to manage the •• facilitate patients in seeking medical
tooth wear. assistance for management of gastro
oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and
3. Recording and monitoring of tooth wear eating disorders, as there is evidence that
using the basic erosive wear examination anti-reflux medication reduces enamel
(BEWE). This is a partial scoring system loss from gastric erosion (Wilder-Smith et
recording the most severely affected al., 2009)
surface in a sextant. The cumulative score
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 71
•• ensure regular medication is acid free and older adults (ie, those aged 65 years
and be aware of medications that reduce and over) 4.4 portions. Furthermore, there is
the flow of saliva, and thus impact on recent evidence that dietary intake nationally
clearance of fruit and vegetables may be reducing,
particularly the latter (Department for
Environment 2013). In light of the paucity of
Management of severe wear intervention studies to support the avoidance
of extrinsic acids, advice should stress the
For severe wear, consideration may be given importance of healthy nutrition whereby fresh
to the following: fruit is an important part of a healthy diet
•• using of dentine bonding agents and consumption should be encouraged for
(Sundaram et al., 2007) and sealants everyone.
(Wagehaupt, Tauböck and Attin, 2013)
•• providing a mouth guard if bruxism is
present
Population advice
As a nation, we are not at risk of excessive
erosion because of fruit consumption. There
is evidence that the majority of children and
adults do not consume enough fruit and
vegetables for a healthy diet. Nationally,
surveys of diet and nutrition among young
people aged 11 to 18 years suggest that
only 11% of boys and 8% of girls in this age
group met the five-a-day recommendation
(the population advice is to consume ‘at
least five-a-day’). The average consumption
of fruit and vegetables was three portions
per day for boys and 2.8 portions per day
for girls (Bates et al., 2013). A higher, yet
still relatively small, proportion of adults met
the five-a-day recommendation with 31% of
adults and 37% of older adults eating five or
more portions per day (equivalent to 400g for
adults) (Bates et al., 2013). Adults aged 19 to
64 years on average consumed 4.1 portions
of fruit and vegetables per day (including
the contribution from composite dishes)
72 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Table 9.1 Sources of acid that may lead to erosive tooth wear
Mechanical wear
Tooth brushing
Abrasive toothpaste
Abrasive food
Bruxism
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 73
As soon as teeth erupt Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
in the mouth brush A. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental review
them twice daily with caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
fluoridated toothpaste Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue
last thing at night and on 1. Art. No.: CD002278. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
one other occasion CD002278.
Hinds K, Gregory JR, (1995). National diet and Observational
nutrition survey: children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years. study
Volume 2: Report of the dental survey. London:
HMSO.
Duckworth RM, Moore SS, (2001). Salivary Clinical
fluoride concentrations after overnight use of measurement
toothpastes. Caries Res. 35: 285. study
Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
A. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental review
caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue
1. Art. No.: CD002278. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002278.
Use only a smear of Bentley EM, Ellwood RP, Davies RM, (1999). Observational
toothpaste Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste by young study
children Br Dent J. May 8;186(9):460-2.
DenBesten P, Ko HS, (1996). Fluoride levels Clinical
in whole saliva of preschool children after measurement
brushing with 0.25 g (pea-sized) as compared study
to 1.0g (full-brush) of a fluoride dentifrice.
Pediatr Dent. 18 (4): 277-280.
Use toothpaste Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe Systematic
containing no less than P, Marinho VCC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of review
1,000 ppm fluoride different concentrations for preventing dental
caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue
1. Art. No.: CD007868. DOI: 0.1002/14651858.
CD007868.pub2.
Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
A. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental review
caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue
1. Art. No.: CD002278. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002278.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 81
The frequency and Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM, (2013). Effect on Systematic
amount of sugary food Caries of restricting sugar intake: systematic review
and drinks should be review to inform WHO guidelines, Journal of
reduced and, when Dental Research 93 (1) 8-18.
consumed, limited to
mealtimes.
Sugars should not be WHO, (2003). Diet nutrition and the prevention Expert review
consumed more than of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO /
four times per day FAO Expert consultation Geneva: WHO.
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy Expert review
(COMA), (1989). Dietary sugars and human
disease. Report of the Panel on Dietary Sugars
of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food
Policy. (Report No 37.). London: HMSO.
Holbrook WP, Kristinsson MJ, Gunnarsdottir Cohort study
S, Birem B, (1989). Caries prevalence,
streptococcus mutans and sugar intake
among 4 year old urban children in Iceland.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 17 292-5.
Holt RD, (1991). Foods and drinks at four daily Cohort study
time intervals in a group of young children.
British Dental Journal 170; 137-143.
Sugar free medicines Shaw, L and Glenwright, HD, (1989), The role of
should be recommended medicines in dental caries formation: need for
sugar-free medication for children. Pediatrician,
16: 153-155.
Hobson P, (1985). Sugar based medicines and Expert
dental disease. Community Dental Health; 2:57- Review
62.
All children aged 3-6 years Type of
evidence
Brush at least twice Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
daily, with fluoridated A. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental review
toothpaste caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue
1. Art. No.: CD002278. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002278.
Brush last thing at night Duckworth RM, Moore SS, (2001). Salivary Clinical
and at least on one other fluoride concentrations after overnight use of measurement
occasion toothpastes. Caries Res. 35: 285. study
82 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Sugars should not be Holbrook WP, Kristinsson MJ, Gunnarsdottir Cohort study
consumed more than S, Birem B, (1989). Caries prevalence,
four times per day streptococcus mutans and sugar intake
among 4 year old urban children in Iceland.
Community Dental Oral Epidemiology 17
292‑5.
Holt RD, (1991). Foods and drinks at four daily Cohort study
time intervals in a group of young children.
British Dental Journal 170; 137-143.
Apply fluoride varnish to Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Systematic
teeth twice yearly Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnishes for preventing review
dental caries in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2013, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD002279. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD002279.pub2.
Sugar free medicines Shaw L and Glenwright HD, (1989). The role of
should be recommended medicines in dental caries formation: need for
sugar-free medication for children. Pediatrician,
16: 153-155.
Hobson P, (1985). Sugar based medicines and Expert review
dental disease. Community Dental Health;
2:57‑62.
All children aged 0-6 years giving concern Type of
evidence
Use fluoridated Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe Systematic
toothpaste containing P, Marinho VCC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of review
1,350 -1,500 ppm different concentrations for preventing dental
fluoride caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1.
Art. No.: CD007868. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD007868.pub2.
Use a smear or pea size Bentley EM, Ellwood RP, Davies RM, (1999). Observational
amount Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste by young study
children Br Dent J. May 8;186(9):460-2.
Reduce recall interval National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, Expert
(2004). Dental Recall: Recall interval between opinion
routine dental examinations. National Institute
of Clinical Excellence, London.
84 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
The frequency and Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM, (2013). Effect on Systematic
amount of sugary food Caries of restricting sugar intake: systematic review
and drinks should be review to inform WHO guidelines, Journal of
reduced and, when Dental Research 93 (1) 8-18.
consumed, limited to WHO, (2003). Diet nutrition and the prevention Expert
mealtimes. of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO / guidance
FAO Expert consultation Geneva: WHO, 2003.
Sugars should not be Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy Expert review
consumed more than (COMA), (1989). Dietary sugars and human
four times per day disease. Report of the Panel on Dietary Sugars
of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food
Policy. (Report No 37.). London: HMSO.
Holbrook WP, Kristinsson MJ, Gunnarsdottir Cohort study
S, Birem B, (1989), Caries prevalence,
streptococcus mutans and sugar intake
among 4 year old urban children in Iceland.
Community Dental Oral Epidemiology 17
292‑5.
Holt RD, (1991). Foods and drinks at four daily Cohort study
time intervals in a group of young children.
British Dental Journal 170; 137 -143.
Apply fluoride varnish to Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Systematic
teeth twice yearly (2.2% Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnishes for preventing review
NaF) dental caries in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2013, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD002279. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD002279.pub2.
American Dental Association, (2006). Expert
Professionally applied topical fluoride: guidance
evidence-based clinical recommendations. J
Am Dent Assoc. 137: 1151–1159.
Children aged from 7 years and young adults giving concern Type of
evidence
Use a fluoride mouth Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
rinse daily (0.05% NaF) A. Fluoride mouth rinses for preventing dental review
at a different time to caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
brushing Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3.
Art. No.: CD002284. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002284. Revised 2009 – no change to
conclusions.
86 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
For those 16+ years with Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe Systematic
active disease consider P, Marinho VCC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of review
prescription of 5,000 different concentrations for preventing dental
ppm toothpaste caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1.
Art. No.: CD007868. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD007868.pub2.
Baysan A, Lynch E, Ellwood R et al., (2001). Clinical trial
Reversal of Primary Root Caries Using
Dentifrices Containing 5,000 and 1,100 ppm
Fluoride. Caries Res 35: 41-46.
Investigate diet and Harris R, Gamboa A, Dailey Y, Ashcroft A. Systematic
assistance to adopt One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in review
good dietary practice a dental setting to change dietary behaviour.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2012, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006540. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD006540.pub2.
Prevention of caries in adults Type of
evidence
Brush at least twice Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
daily, with a fluoridated A. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental review
toothpaste caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue
1. Art. No.: CD002278. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002278.
Brush last thing at night Duckworth RM, Moore SS, (2001). Salivary Clinical
and at least on one other fluoride concentrations after overnight use of measurement
occasion toothpastes. Caries Res. 35: 285. study
Use fluoridated Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe Systematic
toothpaste (1,350-1,500 P, Marinho VCC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of review
ppm fluoride) different concentrations for preventing dental
caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1.
Art. No.: CD007868. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD007868.pub2.
Spit out after brushing Chestnutt IG, Schafer F, Jacobson AP, Stephen Reported
and do not rinse KW, (1998). The influence of toothbrushing behaviour
frequency and post-brushing rinsing on caries among
experience in a caries clinical trial. Community clinical trial
Dent Oral Epidemiol 26 (6): 406-411. participants
88 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
The frequency and Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM (2013) Effect on Caries Systematic
amount of sugary food of restricting sugar intake: systematic review review
and drinks should be to inform WHO guidelines, Journal of Dental
reduced and, when Research 93 (1) 8-18.
consumed, limited to WHO, 2003 Diet nutrition and the prevention of Expert
mealtimes. chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO / FAO guidance
Expert consultation Geneva: WHO, 2003.
Sugars should not be Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy Expert review
consumed more than (COMA). Dietary sugars and human disease.
four times per day Report of the Panel on Dietary Sugars of the
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy.
(Report No 37.). London: HMSO; 1989.
Holbrook WP, Kristinsson MJ, Gunnarsdottir Cohort study
S, Birem B (1989) Caries prevalence,
streptococcus mutans and sugar intake
among 4 year old urban children in Iceland.
Community Dental Oral Eipdemiol 17 292-5.
Holt RD (1991) Foods and drinks at four daily Cohort study
time intervals in a group of young children.
British Dental Journal 170; 137 -143.
Adults giving concern Type of
evidence
Use a fluoride Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
mouthrinse daily (0.05% A. Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental review
NaF) at a different time to caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
brushing Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3.
Art. No.: CD002284. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002284. Revised 2009 – no change to
conclusions.
Apply fluoride varnish to Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Extrapolated
teeth twice yearly (2.2% Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnishes for preventing evidence from
NaF) dental caries in children and adolescents. systematic
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews review
2013, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD002279. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD002279.pub2.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 89
For those with active Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham Systematic
coronal or root caries A. Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental review
prescribe daily fluoride caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane
rinse Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3.
Art. No.: CD002284. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
CD002284. Revised 2009 – no change to
conclusions.
For those with obvious Tavss EA, Mellberg JR, Joziak M, Gambogi Randomised
active coronal or root RJ, Fisher SW, (2003). Relationship between controlled
caries prescribe 2,800 dentifrice fluoride concentration and clinical clinical trial
or 5,000 ppm fluoride caries reduction Am J Dent. Dec;16(6):369-74.
toothpaste
Investigate diet and Harris R, Gamboa A, Dailey Y, Ashcroft A. Systematic
assist to adopt good One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in review
dietary practice a dental setting to change dietary behaviour.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2012, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006540. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD006540.pub2.
Prevention of periodontal disease Type of
evidence
Self-care plaque removal – all adults and children
Remove plaque Needleman I, Suvan J, Moles DR & Pimlott J, Systematic
effectively using methods (2005). A systematic review of professional review of
shown by the dental mechanical plaque removal for prevention randomised
team of periodontal diseases. Journal of Clinical and non-
Periodontology 32, 229-282. randomised
studies
Axelsson P, Nystrom B and Lindhe J, (2004). Observational
The long-term effect of a plaque control study of single
program on toothth mortality, caries and cohort
periodontal disease in adults. J Clin Periodontol
31, 749-757.
This will prevent gingivitis Lang NP, Schatzle MA & Loe H, (2009). Observational
(gum bleeding/redness) Gingivitis as a risk factor in periodontal disease. studies
and reduces the risk of Journal of Clinical Periodontology 36, 3-8.
periodontal disease
90 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Increase intake of non- WCRF/AICR’s Second Expert Report, Food, Expert review
starchy vegetables and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention
fruit of Cancer: a Global Perspective, 2007 http://
www.dietandcancerreport.org/expert_
report/#sthash.grsTYRub.dpuf.
Take a history of tobacco Aveyard P, Begh R, Parsons A, and West R, Systematic
use, give brief advice (2012). Brief opportunistic smoking cessation Review
and signpost to smoking interventions: a systematic review and meta-
cessation service analysis to compare advice to quit and offer of
assistance. Addiction, 107(6): p. 1066-73.
Establish if the patient is Kaner E et al., (2007). Effectiveness of Systematic
drinking above low risk brief alcohol interventions in primary care review of trials
(recommended) levels. If populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic conducted
appropriate signpost to Reviews. CD004148. in primary
alcohol misuse support care settings,
services if available not in dental
practices
Fiellin D et al., (2000). Screening for alcohol Systematic
problems in primary care. Archives of Internal review
Medicine; 160: 1977-1989.
Evidence-based advise and professional intervention about smoking Type of
and other tobacco use evidence
Tobacco use, both Warnakulasuriya KA, Sutherland G, and Review paper
smoking and chewing Scully C, (2005). Tobacco, oral cancer and
tobacco seriously affects treatment dependence. Oral Oncology, 41: p.
general and oral health. 244-260.
The most significant
effect on the mouth is
oral cancers and pre-
cancers.
Do not smoke Carr AB, Ebbert J. Interventions for tobacco Systematic
cessation in the dental setting. Cochrane review
Database of Systematic Reviews 2012,
Issue 6. Art. No.: CD005084. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD005084.pub3.
Do not use shisha pipes Akl EA, Gaddam S, Gunukula SK, Honeine R, Systematic
Jaoude PA, and Irani J, (2010). The effects review
of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health
outcomes: a systematic review. International
Journal of Epidemiology. 39(3): p. 834-57.
96 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
For all patients: Fiellin DA, Reid MC and O’Connor PG, (2000). Systematic
Ask – Establish and Screening for alcohol problems in primary care. review
record if the patient is Archives of Internal Medicine; 160: 1977-1989.
drinking above low risk
(recommended) levels
Advise – offer brief
advice to those drinking
above recommended
levels
Act – refer or signpost
high risk drinkers to
their GP or local alcohol
support services
Evidence-based advise and professional intervention about healthy Type of
eating evidence
The amount and Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM, (2014). Effect on Systematic
frequency of Caries of restricting sugar intake: systematic review
consumption of sugars review to inform WHO guidelines, Journal of
should be reduced Dental Research 93 (1) 8-18.
WHO Diet nutrition and the prevention of Expert review
chronic diseases, (2003). Report of a joint
WHO/FAO Expert consultation (WHO technical
report series 916) Geneva: WHO.
Moynihan P and Petersen PE, (2004). Diet, Expert review
nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases.
Public Health Nutrition 7 (1A) 201-226.
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy Expert review
(COMA), (1989). Dietary sugars and human
disease. Report of the Panel on Dietary Sugars
of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food
Policy. (Report No 37.). London: HMSO.
Rugg-Gunn AJ, Hackett AF, Appleton DR, Cohort study
Jenkins GN and Eastoe JE, (1984).
Relationship between dietary habits and caries
increment assessed over two years in 405
English adolescent school children.
Arch Oral Biol. 29; 12: 983-992.
98 Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention
Avoid sugar containing Moynihan PJ and Holt RD, (1996). The National Observational
foods and drinks at diet and nutrition survey of 1.5-4.5 year old study
bedtime children: summary of the findings of the dental
survey. British Dental Journal, 181(9), 328-332.
Levine, RS, (2001). Caries experience and Cohort study
bedtime consumption of sugar-sweetened
foods and drinks-a survey of 600 children.
Community Dental Health 18: 228-231.
WHO Diet nutrition and the prevention of Expert review
chronic diseases, (2003). Report of a joint
WHO/FAO Expert consultation (WHO technical
report series 916) Geneva: WHO.
To aid dietary Watt R, McGlone Kay E, (2003). Prevention Good practice
modification advice Part 2: Dietary advice in the dental surgery.
consider using a diet British Dental Journal 195, 27-31.
diary over 3 days one Rugg-Gunn A and Nunn J, (1999). Nutrition,
weekend day and 2 diet and oral health. Oxford; Oxford University
weekdays Press.
Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the expert advice received from the Cochrane Oral Health
Group and for their review of the draft document.
Membership of the working group
Chairs: Sue Gregory Head of dental public health, PHE
Jenny Godson Lead for oral health improvement, PHE
Secretary: Amit Bose Department of Health
Collator: Gill Davies Specialist in dental public health, PHE
Jan Clarkson Professor, co-director, dental health services
research unit, University of Dundee School of
Dentistry
Julia Csikar Senior public health manager, PHE
Barry Cockcroft Chief dental officer, NHS England
Nigel Carter Chief executive, British Dental Health Foundation
Jenny Gallagher BASCD president (2011-12)
Semina Makhani Consultant in dental public health, PHE
John Milne Chairman of BDA General Dental Practice
Committee, general dental practitioner
Keith Milsom Consultant in dental public health, PHE
Paula Moynihan Professor of nutrition and oral health, University
of Newcastle
Ian Needleman Professor of restorative dentistry and evidence-
based healthcare, University College London,
Eastman Dental Institute
Derek Richards Director, Centre for Evidence Based Dentistry
Susie Sanderson British Dental Association, general dental
practitioner
David Thomas Chief dental officer, Wales
Richard Watt Professor of dental public health, UCL
We wish to acknowledge the original work carried out by:
Mrs J T Duxbury Miss M A Catleugh
Prof R M Davies Dr G M Davies
And on section 9 by:
David Bartlett Kathy Harley