Legal Ethics Discussion
Legal Ethics Discussion
Legal Ethics Discussion
Can the judge assign a lawyer to render free legal aid to Rule 15.02—a lawyer shall be bound by the rule on
destitute or indigents in civil cases? privileged communication in respect of matter disclosed
- Rule 138, Sec 31 to him by a prospective client
- Another instance of loyalty to the client
Rule 14.03—a lawyer may not refuse to accept - Virtual confessional seal of the client’s secrets and
representation of an indigent client unless: confidences
a. Not in a position to carry out the work effectively or - All forms of communication are covered: oral,
competently; written, actions, signs
- Unethical for a lawyer to accept the case and not - Sec 24(b), Rule 130, ROC
carry out the work competently o Extends farther to the lawyer’s employees
b. Labours under a conflict of interest between him and without the consent of the lawyer and the
the prospective client or between a present client and client
the prospective client o Privilege communication protects lawyer
- Conflict interests from testifying against client (must be with
o When the lawyer would argue a claim on one the consent of the client)
hand and would have to argue the defense
against such claim on the other hand Are pleadings confidential?
- As lawyers, you owe 100% loyalty to your clients; - Yes, before they are filed in court
allowed to be biased
Unprivileged communication
Rule 14.04—a lawyer who accepts the cause of a person - Lawyer can be compelled to testify, or else he may be
unable to pay his professional fess shall observe the same cited in contempt of court
standard of conduct governing his relations with paying
clients Basic limitations of privileged communication
A. Purpose of seeking legal advice
Rule 15.01—a lawyer, in conferring with a prospective B. Not extend to communication of future crimes, a
client, shall ascertain as soon as practicable whether the person committing or about to commit a crime can
matter would involve a conflict with another client or his have no privileged witness; communication must be
own interest, and if so, shall forthwith inform the for a lawful purpose or in furtherance of a lawful end.
prospective client. For other wise, if the purpose is criminal, it is not
- Unethical to continue asking questions about the only lawful to divulge, but the lawyer should be
other party bound to disclose at once in the interest of justice
Rule 15.03—a lawyer shall not represent conflicting Privilege applies to law students under the Law Student
interests except by written consent of all concerned given Practice Rule
after a full disclosure of the facts
2-fold Purposes of the Rule:
Representing conflicting interests is a criminal offense a. To encourage client to make full disclosure without
(Aside from being an administrative offense) fear
- Betrayal of trust by an attorney (Art 209, RPC) b. To enable counsel to obtain full information so as not
- Treachery and double-dealing is condemned to mislead in the evaluation of the merits or demerits
of the client’s case
See: Regala v Sandiganbayan (focus on whether the identity of
the client is covered by the attorney-client privilege; if yes, are
there exceptions? If no, are there exceptions?)