Design, Manufacturing and Operation of A Small Turbojet-Engine For Research Purposes
Design, Manufacturing and Operation of A Small Turbojet-Engine For Research Purposes
Design, Manufacturing and Operation of A Small Turbojet-Engine For Research Purposes
Abstract
During recent years, interest on small-sized gas-turbine engines has increased for both
ground-based and vehicular uses. Small-size turbojet engines, in particular, are becoming
attractive for their potential application on remote-control airplanes or on unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs) because of their extremely-high thrust-to-weight ratio [1]. A num-
ber of small turbojet design examples are available that develop less than 200 N static
thrust (e.g. [2,3]) which have been derived from large turbojet scale-down procedures,
but at a micro scale [4]. However a deep understanding of the behaviour of these engines
is far from being ascertained.
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 049 8276767; fax: +39 049 8276785.
E-mail address: [email protected] (E. Benini).
0306-2619/$ - see front matter Ó 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.05.006
E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116 1103
The lack of knowledge involves almost all the phases of the engine set-up and develop-
ment: design, manufacturing, operation and testing of small engines are regulated by dif-
ferent concepts rather that large aircraft propulsors and require tailored procedures.
The design of such machines is inevitably influenced by their small size. For a millime-
tre/centimetre-scale gas turbine [5], designers have to deal with engineering challenges
comparable with those which characterize large conventional machines, plus the fact that
traditional design criteria do not necessarily apply in the new design space. This involves
particularly the aero-thermo-mechanical behaviour of engine components, since the ther-
modynamic cycle is characterized by relatively high operating temperatures, very low com-
ponent pressure-ratios and efficiencies, and high rotational speeds of the core-assembly. In
this context, the role played by the low Reynolds numbers on engine performance is sig-
nificant and indicates the dominance of frictional forces over inertial ones. Also, heat-
transfer related problems due to the compact engine may affect the engine design and
choice of core-engine architecture. The result is the necessity of an accurate aero-
thermo-dynamic design and, ultimately, a very sensitive engine in terms of operation
and off-design behaviour.
Moreover, combustion-related problems are huge, especially in terms of flame stabiliza-
tion. This involves an accurate design of the combustion chamber and the set-up of an effi-
cient recirculation within the combustion primary zone.
Also manufacturing aspects are peculiar to these engines because of their small size.
Components rotate at very high velocities (>30,000 rpm) so that balancing becomes deci-
sive for safe and durable operation. This implies rotating parts to be machined with very
high precision. The use of bearings featuring excellent stiffness and damping properties is
therefore of primary importance.
The University of Padova is undergoing a project aimed at developing small turbojet
engines for research and educational purposes. The ultimate goal of this project is to
acquire the necessary competency to design, manufacture, operate and test such engines.
2. Design specifications
When defining the specifications for the turbojet engine, we thought about a compact,
lightweight and possibly low-cost system that was able to develop approximately 200 N
thrust under ISO conditions, a choice that we identified as reasonable for an effective
research/didactic experiment without excessive expenditure regarding the propulsor and
the test bench. These features were achieved according to some basic thermodynamic
and mechanical rules, described as follows:
1. Select a simple open Brayton–Joule thermodynamic cycle in order to make the overall
design and system architecture as simple as possible, and thus avoid any cycle sophis-
tication, such as internal regeneration, air bleeding, blade cooling, etc.
2. Adopt a turbine-inlet temperature smaller than 1000 K. Even if this choice limits the
maximum obtainable thermal efficiency to values less than 20% (when the engine is
operated at sea-level conditions), it makes it possible to use a low-cost steel to construct
the turbine parts.
3. Choose a single-shaft configuration. Such a characteristic has a positive impact on
engine weight and size, as well as on component simplicity, although it makes the
engine less flexible in its operation.
1104 E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116
The following are the steps that we followed in the development of the turbojet.
A Brayton–Joule cycle simulator was used to predict the performance of the turbojet
engine; the simulator was implemented as described in detail in [6]. In the thermodynamic
model, the following assumptions were made:
– Ambient pressure and temperature of air are 288.15 K and 101.3 kPa, respectively.
– Air behaves as an semi-ideal gas with specific heats variable with temperature.
– Fuel/air mixture behaves like a semi-ideal equivalent gas with enthalpy, entropy and
specific heats depending on temperature and fuel/air equivalence ratio [7].
– Intake isentropic-efficiency is 0.97.
– Compressor’s isentropic-efficiency is 0.78.
– Burner efficiency is 0.94.
– Combustor’s pneumatic-efficiency is 0.9.
– Turbine’s isentropic-efficiency is 0.8.
– Nozzle’s isentropic-efficiency is 0.98.
– Nozzle is unchoked.
The fuel is assumed to be liquid kerosene for residential use with a heating value of
42,700 kJ/kg.
Using such hypotheses, a parametric analysis was carried out to derive the cycle pres-
sure ratio that guaranteed the maximum engine specific thrust of 377 N/(kg/s). Therefore,
a pressure ratio of 2.66 was selected and a maximum cycle-temperature of 950 K was
adopted accordingly. Correspondingly, for the design thrust of 200 N at the fixed point,
the air mass flow rate is 0.53 kg/s. The other relevant parameters of the cycle are reported
in Table 1.
For small, compact and light-weight jet engines, the choice of a single-stage centrifugal
compressor featuring a double-stage diffuser (radial and deswirl) is mandatory [8]. Using
the design data from the cycle study, the impeller and diffuser were designed following the
procedure outlined by [8,9]. For the sake of simplicity, we decided to design an impeller
with radial blades, because, this typology easier to be manufactured, even if it is recog-
nized not to be as optimal as a backswept-bladed impeller [8,10,11] as far as the peak
efficiency and part-load operation are concerned.
The first step consisted in a one-dimensional calculation of the impeller and the diffuser,
including loss and deviation correlations provided by Aungier [13].
E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116 1105
Table 1
Relevant parameters at fixed-point operation from the cycle analysis
Required static thrust at ISO conditions 200 N
Turbine’s inlet temperature (TIT) 950 K
Compression ratio 2.66
Compressor’s delivery-pressure 262 kPa
Compressor’s delivery-temperature 407 K
Turbine’s inlet-pressure 246 kPa
Turbine’s outlet-pressure 137 kPa
Turbine’s outlet-temperature 847 K
Fuel/air ratio 0.0137
Specific thrust 377 m/s
Nominal speed 60,000 rpm
Thermal efficiency 12%
As one might expect, the combustion chamber design is a very complicated task in small
gas-turbine engines, being its size limited by the strong coupling issues regarding the com-
pressor and turbine, typically constructive limitations on shaft length and diameter. These
1106 E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116
Fig. 1. Velocity field in (a) the impeller and (b) diffuser obtained from the CFD simulation of the compressor at
60,000 rpm.
E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116 1107
requirements have focused our attention on a particular type of combustor, i.e. a direct-
flow annular chamber. This layout is illustrated in Figs. 5, 6 and 10: the air exiting the
compressor is subject to quite a sudden diffusion within the gap between the compressor
diffuser outlet and the combustor liner, and then directly forced to enter the chamber
though circumferential holes (therefore without the use of a swirler), where it mixes with
the evaporated fuel that impinges against the air stream from the cylindrical fuel injector
pipes. The mixing is augmented by the presence of turbulators, and the recirculation in the
primary zone is created from the interaction between the primary air entering the combus-
tor front and the air jets entering from outside the liner.
The main advantages of this configuration are similar to those characterizing the tradi-
tional annular combustion chamber of large-size engines [15]: satisfactory fuel–air mixing,
compactness, lightness, and efficient liner cooling. In fact, this arrangement does not exhi-
bit excessive surface-to-volume ratio of the liner, as in reverse-flow combustors. However,
the main drawback is the relatively poor aerodynamic performance due to the high
pressure-loss that occurs in the diffusion zone.
The design of the combustor was performed following the rules dictated by Lefebvre
[15]: Two main issues have been considered and lead to a complicated design, i.e. a correct
primary-zone recirculation and the problem of flame stabilization.
The so-called swirl vanes at the entry to the combustor, a solution which is widely used
in large gas-turbines, were not used because of difficulties in manufacturing and because
fuel was not intended to be injected by means of individual nozzles. Instead, large-scale
primary-zone recirculation using a small number of large air jets has finally led to the suc-
cessful design. When correctly placed, these recirculation holes significantly improved mix-
ing and combustion stability, and the test runs resulted in a spotless combustion chamber.
Regarding flame stability, some issues deserve to be discussed. As is well known, stabil-
ity limits for sustained combustion with respect to fuel-to-air ratio are wide, but these lim-
its are much narrower for ignition. Therefore, good ignition characteristics depend greatly
on the fuel-injector design and the achievable atomization quality. A well-atomized or
evaporated fuel (preferably close to the stoichiometric fuel-to-air ratio) is required in
the primary zone, especially at low rotational speeds, when air temperature and pressure
at the inlet to the combustion chamber are almost ambient. This is especially detrimental
to ignition performance because of the large ignition heat-loss and the very poor fuel-
atomization quality that can actually be achieved.
High-quality fuel atomization using plain orifice nozzles was investigated, but small
high-performance orifice nozzles require high fuel-pressures and heavy onboard boost-
pumps to achieve fine fuel-sprays. Moreover, they tend to create large spray-cone angles,
and a finer fuel spray will mean a larger cone angle. The heat transfer caused by the
impingement of burning droplets onto the liner’s inner wall is high, especially in a very
1110 E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116
small combustion chamber. For these reasons, fuel pre-evaporation provided the best
solution. The design consists of a fuel pre-evaporator manifold located within the combus-
tion chamber. Because the fuel and the combustion chamber are cold at start-up, the fuel
cannot be pre-evaporated unless it is preheated to its high evaporation temperatures just
before ignition, which is cumbersome. The solution was to use a natural-gas fuel for start-
up and ignition. The latter was accomplished by a discharge spark-ignition unit developed
in-house.
A kerosene fuel was then selected for operating this turbojet engine after start-up. At
minimum idle speed, the transfer to kerosene fuel is initiated through the same gas man-
ifold, using synchronized valves. The already hot gases in the combustion chamber then
preheat the fuel in the manifold to a high evaporation level before it enters the combustion
chamber. Kerosene has good combustion characteristics when properly evaporated and is
much safer to handle than gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas. Although very flammable,
kerosene has less of a tendency to form explosive mixtures quickly when a leak occurs,
such as from pumps or feed lines. Safety in fuel handling and engine operation has been
a serious design issue. Finally, since kerosene at high temperatures tends to produce coke
as a result of the thermal cracking of hydrocarbons, we were particularly worried about
coke layer formation on the inner wall of the evaporators.
The use of kerosene did require the addition of a booster pump for fuel pressurization.
The main difficulty with kerosene fuel was proper evaporation within the limited space of
the combustion chamber. Ample margins in temperature (thermal stress) and rotor speed
(component loadings) have been provided to ensure a long life, particularly for the hot-
section components. The maximum operating turbine-inlet temperature of 1000 K has
proven to be well below the turbine’s capability. The constructed combustion chamber
(using AISI 316L steel) is depicted in Fig. 6.
As a result of the combustion chamber design, and therefore from a knowledge of the
fluid/mass flow rate to be expanded, as well as the fluid’s stagnation-temperature and pres-
sure at the combustor exit, a single-stage, axial-flow turbine was selected as the preferred
configuration to drive the compressor. It consists of a nozzle row and a 0.55 reaction tur-
bine wheel. The profiles of the nozzle and the rotor are in-house evolutions of the standard
A3K7 airfoils that we studied to obtain satisfactory performance from both the aerody-
namic and structural points of view. They were actually derived using a prescribed-curva-
ture turbine-blade method [19].
The preliminary design was carried out using a one-dimensional procedure at the mean
radius of the turbine, following the well-known procedure illustrated by Horlock [18], and
using loss correlations given by Craig and Cox [17], and the deviation correlation
expressed by Ainley and Mathienson [20]. The nozzle row featured 25 blades having con-
stant stagger angles with radius, while a free-vortex criterion was used to determine the
angles at various radii of the 29 rotor blades (Fig. 7). The optimal solidity of each blade
row was found using the Zweifel criterion, however setting the tangential-lift coefficient to
1.1, as suggested in [16]. In this way, the loading on the blade was increased with respect to
conventional design practice.
The nozzle blade row was constructed using refractory steel 310S. On the other hand,
the material used for turbine rotor blades is a W302 steel (both components are
E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116 1111
Fig. 7. Computer representation of the turbine rotor (left) and nozzle vanes (right).
represented in Fig. 8). The compressor and turbine are connected using a V145 steel shaft
supported by a couple of preloaded ball bearings. The rotor-bearing module was accu-
rately aligned and balanced with all other components in order to control the tip clear-
ances of both compressor and turbine.
Both bearings are lubricated and cooled with oil fed from the externally-mounted tank
by a tube through the compressor casing. This lube-oil system is of the total-loss type.
Only a little oil is required during normal operation. A closed-loop system would be too
heavy and too difficult to engineer, and would require an overly complex sealing arrange-
ment. The lube-oil flow is controlled by a small orifice of proprietary size, and the oil is fed
to both bearings using compressor discharge air. Before start-up, when no pressure is
available, oil is fed manually. All oil is finally lost in the exhaust duct where it is entrained
in the hot gases.
A simple convergent-shaped exhaust nozzle was designed featuring an effective exit area
of 6013 cm2, which makes the nozzle unchoked at the design point. This component was
built from AISI 316L steel plates, and manufactured as illustrated in Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Discharge nozzle: Computer representation (left) and manufactured component (right).
A modular design concept has been maintained throughout the entire engine. All com-
ponents have been designed to be easily manufactured and assembled. The turbojet engine
has been divided into several modules that are combined by means of bolts, press-fit con-
nections, and special clamps. Figs. 10 and 11 show a meridional section and a three-dimen-
sional view of the assembly.
4. Turbojet testing
The developed turbojet, after an accurate balancing of the core-assembly, was mounted
and tested on a test rig, whereby rotational speed, exhaust static temperature of hot gases,
compressor static discharge pressure, thrust (static), bearing and oil temperature, and fuel
pressure and temperature can be measured.
The test rig consisted of a bench where the engine is mounted as depicted in Fig. 12. The
test rig is equipped with the following instrumentation:
1114 E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116
(1) Three insulated thermojunctions of the K-type, which are placed downstream of the
turbine rotor.
(2) An analogic Bourdon-type manometer, connected to static-pressure taps place at the
compressor outlet.
(3) A load cell for measuring the thrust developed by the engine.
(4) A magnetic tachometer, via which the rotational regime of the engine can be
measured.
(5) A volumetric gear pump for pumping the fuel into the combustion chamber.
(6) An electric motor for starting the engine (i.e. until self-operation is achieved).
(7) A discharge spark-ignition unit for the igniter.
(8) Synchronized control valves for both natural-gas fuel and kerosene.
(9) An oil pump for the lubrication of the bearings.
At engine start-up, electric power from the auxiliary motor is used to accelerate the
core-assembly to approximately 10,000 rpm.
At this point the ignition is turned on, the natural-gas-fuel valve is opened, and light-up
occurs, accelerating the engine further to its minimum idle speed of approximately
20,000 rpm. From this point the electric motor is disconnected and the engine is self-oper-
ated. The thrust then produced can be quite easily controlled by acting on the fuel flow
rate, which in turn determines the instantaneous rotational velocity of the turbojet.
Changeover from natural-gas fuel to kerosene is accomplished using the same fuel man-
ifold system, by simultaneously closing the gas-fuel valve and opening the liquid-fuel
valve. During changeover, the turbojet engine runs on a mixture of gas fuel and kerosene
E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116 1115
for a few seconds. This method has been very successful. Further acceleration to the
engine’s maximum continuous speed of 60,000 rpm can then be initiated.
The main results of the tests (Fig. 13) are the curves that relate the static net thrust pro-
duced, the total fuel consumption, the static compression ratio and the thermal efficiency
(also called core efficiency) to the engine’s rotational speed.
At present, the engine has undergone over 500 h of operation and performed well with-
out a decrease in performance; moreover we did not register any coke formation on the
evaporator walls, but further long-term performance tests have to be carried out to ana-
lyze the combustor behaviour over time.
A large amount of research has been carried out at the Dept. of Mechanical Engi-
neering, University of Padova to design and develop a small, low-cost 200 N-thrust jet
engine that can be used for research and didactic purposes. The project made it possible
to acquire the necessary expertise to self-design, manufacture, operate and test such
engine, and laid the basis upon which further research work can be carried out. In fact,
the next steps will be directed toward improving engine efficiency trough an increment
of cycle pressure ratio and turbine inlet temperature (for which the use of super Nichel
alloys and/or ceramic materials is mandatory), followed by endurance and reliability
tests.
References
[1] Chu HH, Chiang Hsiao-Wei. Aerospace technology development – Small gas-turbine development. Taiwan,
ROC: Aerospace Development Planning, National Science Council; 1996. p. 4–22.
1116 E. Benini, S. Giacometti / Applied Energy 84 (2007) 1102–1116
[2] Jackson AJB, Laskaridis P, Pilidis P. Test bed for small aero gas-turbines for education and for University–
Industry Collaboration. ASME Paper GT-2004-54334; 2004.
[3] Davison CR, Birk AM. Set-up and operational experience with a micro-turbine engine for research and
education. ASME Paper GT-2004-53377; 2004.
[4] Epstein AH. Millimeter-scale, MEMS gas-turbine engines. ASME Paper GT-2003-38866.
[5] Rodgers C. Some effects of size on the performances of small gas-turbines. ASME Paper GT-2003-38027;
2003.
[6] Hill PG, Peterson CR. Mechanics and thermodynamics of propulsion. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley;
1992.
[7] Cumpsty N. Jet propulsion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
[8] Japikse D. Centrifugal-compressor design and performance. Wilder, Vermont: Concepts ETI, Inc.; 1994.
[9] Whitfield A, Baines NC. The design of radial turbomachines. London, UK: Longman; 1990.
[10] Zangeneh M, Goto A, Harada H. On the design criteria for suppression of secondary flows in centrifugal and
mixed-flow impellers. ASME J Turbomachinery 1998;120:723–35.
[11] Benini E. Optimal Navier–Stokes design of compressor impellers using evolutionary computation. Int J
Comput Fluid Dyn 2003;17(5):357–69.
[12] Benini E, Toffolo A, Lazzaretto A. Experimental and numerical analyses to enhance the performance of a
microturbine diffuser. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 2006;30(5):427–40.
[13] Aungier RH. Centrifugal compressors – A strategy for aerodynamic design and analysis. New York: ASME
Press; 2000.
[14] Cumpsty NA. Compressor aerodynamics. UK: Longman Group; 1989.
[15] Lefebvre AH. Gas-turbine combustion. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999.
[16] Wilson DG, Korakianitis T. The design of high-efficiency turbomachinery and gas turbines. 2nd ed.
Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1998.
[17] Craig HRM, Cox HJA. Performance prediction of axial-flow turbines. Proc Inst Mech Engrs
1971;185(32/71).
[18] Horlock JH. Axial-flow turbines. London: Butterworths; 1966.
[19] Korakianitis T. Prescribed-curvature-distribution airfoils for the preliminary geometric design of axial-
turbomachinery cascades. J Turbomachinery 1993;115(2):325–33.
[20] Ainley DG, Mathienson GCR. An examination of the flow and pressure losses in blade rows of axial-flow
turbines R&M No. 2892 (March). UK: Aeron. Research Comm.; 1951.