Dan Gross and Why Gun Violence Can

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Alex White

Professor VanGrimbergen

English Comp 1

Friday, October 19 2018

White 1

Dan Gross and Why Gun Violence Can’t be our New Normal

Have you ever listened to a speech that moved you? Not literally but mentally of course.

While listening to the speech you fell a rush of emotions inside you. In the beginning you are

captivated and are wanting more. The speaker introduces you to the speech and welcomes you to

hear their opinion. The middle of the speech makes you angry, happy, and sad. You get wrapped

up in the feelings with the speaker and feel for them and the people involved in the speech. Then

the conclusion makes you feel inspired and wanting a change. It leaves with not wanting more

but wanting to get out of your chair and rush around town to tell people all about this problem,

and you want to make the change and you want to make it now. That is exactly what Dan Gross

did with his speech “Why Gun Violence Can’t be our New Normal” at TED2016. This analysis

will look into his speech to see if he used pathos, ethos, logic, and played off of his intend

audience perfectly in his speech which will lead to an overall outstanding speech.

Pathos, the appeal to emotion, which creates an emotional response. By listening to his

speech Dan Gross achieved this by speaking the truth. By telling the people what they needed to

hear not what they wanted. By saying that 900 children a year take their life with a gun. Letting

the people know that nine people every day die in the US because of gun use. Telling the people

that those nine gun deaths a day usually go unnoticed. Talking to the people about the fact that

guns don’t actually keep your home safe. That the home security thing is just a big lie that has

been told enough times that people start to believe it. Reading over those facts you felt some
Alex White

Professor VanGrimbergen

English Comp 1

Friday, October 19 2018

White 2

emotion. It could have been disbelief, shock, sadness, or even anger. Or after reading that

sentence do you now believe you felt emotion but actually didn’t? Now you are feeling confused.

Dan Gross does this all throughout his speech and it keeps the listener engaged and wanting

more. You are eager to know more and wishing he would speed up his talking so you get the

information faster. He doesn’t just use pathos to engage the reader though.

Dan Gross also uses ethos, which is the appeal to ethics. While listening to his speech

Dan Gross uses credibility from multiple sources to back up his reasoning. He backs up his

reasoning that home security by a gun is all a lie by saying that the corporate gun lobby has spent

billions of dollars blocking the CDC from doing research into the public health epidemic of gun

violence. By this being block it prevents pediatricians from talking to parents about the dangers

of guns in the home. Which in a long term prevents kids from learning smart-gun technology that

would prevent kids from firing a parents’ gun. He also uses reasoning and backing up all

throughout his speech which lets you know he is credible and is reliable. Dan Gross has so far

used pathos and ethos in his speech but will he use logo?

Logo is the appeal to logic. You can achieve this by using reason to persuade the

audience. While listening to Dan Gross’ speech I can tell he does this exactly. He does this by

cause and effect. He states in his speech “some period TV show will depict the terrible nightmare

of gun violence...” then the effect is “...future generation of children might only be able to

imagine how terrible it must have been (to use guns)”. He does this again when he says, “…how
Alex White

Professor VanGrimbergen

English Comp 1

Friday, October 19 2018

White 3

all those behaviors that were once considered commonplace or normal…” then the effect to this

cause is “…have become stigmatized in just a generation or two…” This helps build the effect of

rapid time loss and how quickly we have developed. In his speech, Dan Gross has so far used

paths, ethos, and logo but will he keep in mind his intended audience?

Dan Gross’ intended audience while delivering this speech are men and woman in their

adult hood either seeking advice, wanting to solve a problem, or wanting to be inspired. They all

sat down in their seats wishing and hoping for something to change in their head. Dan Gross has

to keep this in mind when writing and giving his speech. He can make the audience be captivated

and be able to relate by using statistics and examples of events that have recently happened. He

does this by talking about hunting, which is a sport that everyone knows and can somewhat

relate to. By talking about hunting he captivates the audience and they are able to relate to the

topic and think of firsthand what they would do. Now he has the audience thinking which will

keep them engaged and listening. In the long run Dan Gross keeps his intended audience in mind

when writing and giving his speech.

To conclude, Dan Gross creates a wonderful speech by using pathos, ethos, logo, and

keeping his intended audience in mind. He uses pathos by telling us the truth and creating

emotion, uses ethos by using credibility from multiple sources to back up his reasoning, uses

logo by cause and effect, and uses his intended audience by using events that they can relate to.

By listening to amazing speeches you can be inspired to want to help solve a problem or change
Alex White

Professor VanGrimbergen

English Comp 1

Friday, October 19 2018

White 4

something in your everyday life. You could even be inspired to want to write your own speech

and get your voice out there. The question isn’t what is the problem? The question is, what needs

to be solved?

Works Cited

Gross, Dan. “Why Gun Violence Can’t be our New Normal.” Speech at TED2016

You might also like