Learning Cultures Communities

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

Knowing what we know and need to

know about effective teaching

Graham Nuthall
Education Department
University of Canterbury

Classrooms are complex places, and the best


teachers are successful because they are thoughtful
opportunists who create instructional practices to
meet situational demands (Hoffman & Duffy,
1999)
Purpose:

To look critically at research on teaching,


• especially research on the relationship
of teaching to learning.

Not research on teachers themselves


or how teachers experience
& think about teaching
Two sources of knowledge about effective
teaching

Teachers’ practical experiences

Formal research studies

But there is a gap between them

Teachers treat it as a source of good ideas


Researchers think teachers
should apply its findings
To evaluate methods of research on teaching

We must first decide what kind of knowledge they should


produce

This requires answering three questions


1. Why do we need formal research?
Why is practical experience not enough?
2. What do teachers need to know?
What is the problem to be solved?
3. What kind of relationship is possible
between teaching & learning?
• Why is practical experience not enough?

Teachers cannot:
a. monitor student learning continuously & consistently
b. be aware of all student experience

2. What do teachers need to know?


Replace implicit, unexamined beliefs about learning

With validated explicit understanding


of how teaching relates to learning
3. How is teaching related to learning?
Oser & Baeriswyl model
(Handbook of Research on Teaching 4th edition)

Visible structure: instructional procedures for science concept

Whole class: Small group: Individual: Individual: Individual: Whole class:


teacher gives conducting answering conference
worksheet writes review of
instructions experiment with report results
questions teacher

Prior
knowledge

The base model: elements of learning a concept


Problems with Oser & Baeriswyl model

1. Individual student experience is a function of:


a. The visible teacher-managed activities &
accountability
b. The semi-visible peer culture & relationships
c. The semi-visible ways students manage their
behaviour

2. Links between visible structure & base model


are created by students making sense of,
& extracting information from,
their experiences
Question is now:

To provide teachers with an understanding


of how their activities affect student learning

need to know how student experience


is shaped by teacher activities

& how students extract meaning


& learn from those experiences
Research on the best teachers

CERI studies in 9 OECD countries


Hopkins and Stern synthesized the results of 9 countries

Excellent descriptions of cultural beliefs


about good teachers
How reliable is a teacher’s reputation?

Ratings by principals & other experts do not relate to


student learning
(studies 1930s – 1990s)

a. teaching interactively varies with content,


context, students
b. teacher effects on student learning vary
with content, context, students
When is an effective teacher effective?

Confusion of effective teaching with effective teachers

The cultural ideal of the effective teacher is unchanging

But still need to know


how teachers affect student learning
in order to know what to look for
The Correlational and Experimental Studies
Studies relating teacher behaviour to student
learning had two advantages
1. Systematic observation (recording) of teaching
-- teachers do not do what they say (believe) they do
-- the gender studies

2. Used independent assessment of student learning


Christchurch study of effective teaching (Wright & Nuthall)

22 teachers teaching 3 lessons on the black-backed gull


6 clusters of teacher behaviours
correlated with student achievement
1. Asking clear questions that elicited answers
2. Asking closed questions
3. several students involved in each question
4. praising student responses
5. providing feedback after attempts at answers
6. revising content at the end of lessons
Problems with this research

Teacher behaviour treated as contextless variables


(the more the better)

Treated all students as one modal student

Tried to generalise the surface features of teaching


(the visible structure)
Design Experiments

Know the basic principles learning


need to design methods to implement principles

The ThinkerTools Inquiry Curriculum


(White & Frederiksen, University of Berkeley)

Physics unit on “force & motion”


Students design and carry out their own experiments
using ThinkerTools software
Reflective assessment process

1. Understanding the science


2. Understanding the inquiry
3. Being inventive
4. Being systematic
5. Using tools and representations
6. Reasoning carefully
7. Communicating well
8. Teamwork and collaboration
Evaluation

Trial of 10 week version in 12 7th – 9th grad classrooms


Students reported their own experiments
Tests of knowledge
Inquiry test (design own experiment)
Attitudes

Very effective especially with heterogeneous groups


and low achievers
Interpretation

“We believe this is due, in part, to the initial introduction of


the Inquiry Cycle as a set of ordered activities that
students can easily follow. A student’s deeper
understanding of the significance of the activities comes
from actually practicing them and reflecting on them
over time.” (White & Frederiksen, 1998, p. 76).
“The implicit overall goal is teaching about thought by
providing conceptual categories that permit one to reflect
on and talk about one’s thought processes in carrying out
scientific inquiry” (White & Frederiksen, 1998, p. 79).
What can teachers do with it?

Download from web site manual, worksheets,


computer programme
http://thinkertools.berkeley.edu/tt/
Evaluated the whole package without consideration
for variations of teachers & students within classes
How can a teacher know how to adapt?
What is essential and what is peripheral?

All the authors can do is speculate


about how and why it works
ThinkerTools Implementation:
curriculum unit: Teacher behaviour,
Teacher handbook, use of resources,
software, etc. adaptations
Student
experiences Student
& learning achievement

Student
demographics
& culture
Teacher action research
and the development of craft knowledge

Only teacher developed knowledge can be practical

Knowledge that teachers develop from experience


Is different from knowledge
from formal academic research
Hiebert, Gallimore & Stigler

Teacher craft knowledge, built on individual case studies,


can be integrated,
can produce public professional knowledge.

Fail to account for the limitations of teacher research


Lack of
a. systematic, student focused observation/recording,
b. independent real-time assessment of learning
c. awareness of other factors affecting
student learning
science unit on space, Year 5/6 class, self-selected activities

PA T Percentoftestitem s
A ge Percentile K now n Learn’d N otlrn’d
Total

A bby 10.6 14.5 37 48 15 85


D ion 9.8 39.3 62 21 17
83
Joseph 11.3 74.0 94 2 4 96
Lois 11.0 71.5 88 4 8 92

How is it possible that the less able,


know less, but learn more?
The extent to which teacher action research produces
generalisable knowledge about teaching-learning
relationships

depends on the extent to which it follows formal


research procedures.
Professional knowledge base most needed

General knowledge about the ways classroom activities


(including teaching)
shape the development of student minds

Not all, but the core of what they need to know

Research methods should be evaluated for


their contribution to this knowledge
Not on their political, social or
philosophical justifications.
Kinds of methods and data needed

1. Teaching effectiveness based on independent data


from students
2. Direct structured observations/recordings of students
and teachers
3. Recordings/observations must be continuous over the
learning period
(continued)
4. Analysis that connects teaching activities and learning
in real time
5. Focus on multiple assessments of the learning of
individual students
6. Develop bottom-up evidence-based explanation and
theory, not speculation about missing links
Discard our acceptance of

Indirect ambiguous data

Speculation instead of evidence-based theory

Endless discovery of the unique


There is still a long way to go to establish

Practical, generalisable, evidence-based


professional knowledge

To replace the tacit beliefs about teaching & learning


that currently limit teachers’ ability
to learn from experience.

» Thank you

You might also like