State of Vermont Department of Mental Health Redstone Building 26 Terrace Street Phone 802-828-3824 Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 Fax 802-828-3823 WWW - Mentalhealth.vermont - Gov 800-253-0191
State of Vermont Department of Mental Health Redstone Building 26 Terrace Street Phone 802-828-3824 Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 Fax 802-828-3823 WWW - Mentalhealth.vermont - Gov 800-253-0191
State of Vermont Department of Mental Health Redstone Building 26 Terrace Street Phone 802-828-3824 Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 Fax 802-828-3823 WWW - Mentalhealth.vermont - Gov 800-253-0191
The Department of Mental Health (DMH) in compliance with Title 18, Chapter 177, Section
7408, has adopted standards to govern the practice of electroconvulsive therapy. These standards
will be applied to hospitals that practice electroconvulsive therapy in the state of Vermont. DMH has
selected The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy, Recommendations for Treatment, Training, and
Privileging, Second Edition, published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) as the basis of
the standards of practice.
These guidelines are intended to assist with the identification of important clinical areas
regarding ECT administration. They will be used to guide the Department of Mental Health’s
oversight and monitoring of facilities administering electroconvulsive therapy. These guidelines are
not intended to be all inclusive. The APA’s Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy should be referred to
when additional information is required. APA page numbers are referenced to help locate specific
topic areas.
1
Vermont Department of Mental Health
ECT Guidelines
Table of Contents
I. Indications for Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy (APA p 5-25) ...................................................................... 3
X. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 14
Attachment A ........................................................................................................................................................ 15
2
I. Indications for Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy (APA p 5-25)
Major Depression
• Unipolar major depression
• Bipolar major depression, bipolar disorder, depressed, and bipolar disorder, mixed
Mania
• Mania
Schizophrenia
• Psychotic symptoms – abrupt onset
• Catatonic type
• History of a favorable response to ECT
• Schizophreniform disorder
• Schizoaffective disorder
• Psychotic disorders not otherwise specified
• When clinical features are similar to those of other major diagnostic indications
Psychiatric Disorders
Psychiatric disorders other than the principal diagnostic indications is not adequately substantiated
and should be carefully justified in the clinical record.
Non-Psychiatric Disorders
ECT may be of benefit in the treatment of the following disorders:
• Delirium of various etiologies, including toxic and metabolic.
• Chronic intractable pain
• Delirium
• Parkinson’s disease
• Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
• Intractable seizure disorder
3
II. Pre-ECT Evaluation (APA p 77-79)
Hospital policy should determine the specific components of the routine pre-ECT evaluation. The
following should be included at a minimum.
a) A psychiatric history and examination -including an assessment of the effects of any prior ECT
b) Cognitive assessment including a mini-mental status exam and Montgomery-Asberg
Depression Rating Scale to determine both cognitive (memory) and depressive symptoms
baseline . . This will include assessment of memory impairement from a previous course of
treatment with ECT.
c) A medical evaluation
d) Including an assessment of the teeth and mouth to identify any dental risk factors
e) Laboratory tests as indicated
f) An evaluation by an individual privileged to administer ECT summarizing indications and risks,
and suggesting any additional evaluative procedures, alterations in ongoing medications, or
necessary modifications in ECT technique.
g) Evaluation by an anesthesiologist
h) Assessment to include patient’s previous exposure to anesthesia, review of any side effects,
and allergies
Medical evaluation of risk factors should be carried out prior to ECT (APA p 27-29)
• Unstable or severe cardiovascular conditions
• Aneurysm or vascular malformation
• Increased intracranial pressure
• Recent cerebral infarction
• Pulmonary condition
• Intracranial space occupying lesion
• Serious musculoskeletal problems
4
III. Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Special Populations (APA p
31-58)
Neurologic Disorders
Patients with increased intracranial pressure have substantially elevated risk with ECT; its use must be
justified in terms of risk/benefit considerations.
Cardiovascular Disorders
Consultation with a physician who has expertise in the assessment and treatment of cardiovascular
diseases should be considered if the pre-ECT evaluation suggests significantly increased cardiovascular
risk.
Other Disorders
• Patients with unstable or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should be considered for
medical consultation.
• Patients with clinically significant hyperthyroidism should receive specialty consultation.
• Specialty consultation should be used with pheochromocytoma
• Patients with recent or evolving retinal detachment should undergo ophthalomologic
consultation.
Pregnancy
• In pregnant patients, obstetric consultation should be obtained prior to ECT.
• At facilities administering ECT to pregnant women, resources for managing obstetric and
neonatal emergencies should be readily accessible.
Cognitive Disorders
• Consultation with a memory disorder specialist may be indicated for patients with pre-existing
cognitive impairments prior to initiation of ECT.
• Detection and monitoring of the presence of ECT-related cognitive impairment, orientation
and memory function should be assessed prior to ECT and periodically throughout the ECT
course. If such impairment occurred in the past, then the treatment plan for a future course of
ECT should be modified accordingly to minimize chances of such problems as the person
experienced in a prior course.
• Based on assessment, potential treatment modifications include changing from bilateral to
right unilateral electrode placement, decreasing the intensity of electrical stimulation,
increasing the time interval between treatments, altering the dosage of medications, or, if
necessary, terminating the treatment course.
5
IV. Informed Consent for Electroconvulsive Therapy
A. . All facilities must use the Informed Consent guidelines set by the Vermont Department of Mental
Health. The consent forms are available at
http://mentalhealth.vermont.gov/sites/dmh/files/publications/DMH-ECT_Informed_Consent.pdf
B.
C. Hospitals providing ECT will address specific to informed consent in special circumstances, such as
medical guardianship and advanced directive, in their policies and procedures.
i. Advance Directives
• Patients retain the right to refuse ECT treatment. If the patient has an Advanced Directive, the
agent must be notified of the refusal, even if the Advanced Directive includes reference to ECT.
If the Advance Directive includes a Ulysses clause regarding ECT, the agent must be notified
and, if the agent consents to the ECT, the treatment can be given even if the patient objects.
• Medical guardians with specific authorization have the authority to give consent for ECT
treatment.
• If a person who has a medical guardian refused treatment, the guardian must be notified. The
guardian must obtain permission from the court in order to override the objection and consent
to the ECT.
• Each member of the ECT treatment team, as defined in Chapter 9, should be clinically
privileged to practice his or her respective ECT-related duties or be otherwise authorized
by law to do so. Such privileging should be carried out according to procedures
established by the organized medical staff of the facility or its equivalent under whose
auspices ECT is administered.
• The medical director of each facility should ensure that privileges to administer ECT are
granted only to psychiatrists with demonstrated proficiency to deliver ECT in a safe and
effective manner.
• The medical director, with the assistance of appropriate individuals, should develop a
formal written plan for provision and maintenance of ECT privileges. This plan should
designate those responsible for determining whether privileging criteria have been met.
Proceedings of all privileging actions should be documented.
• The applicant’s education, training, experience, and history of privileging in ECT should be
reviewed by the committee designated for this purpose to determine whether the
applicant is competent to practice ECT. If so, clinical ECT privileges may be granted
following satisfactory administration of ECT as observed by a designated in-house
evaluator or, if necessary, by an outside consultant.
• A practitioner with insufficient knowledge in ECT procedures should undertake
appropriate training. Privileges may then be awarded after completion of 1) the
prescribed training experience, 2) the local orientation process, and 3) demonstration of
proficient administration of ECT in the local setting.
• Reassessment of privileges should occur at least every 2 years or as specified by policies of
the institution. Policies developed by the facility for this purpose should contain the
7
following components 1) Use of a quality improvement program to monitor selected
aspects of ECT treatment team performance, review of any apparent deficits, and
institution of corrective action 2) Ongoing monitoring of number of ECT treatments
administered by treating psychiatrists, so that individuals whose practice becomes inactive
can be given the opportunity to demonstrate use of proficient technique on resuming an
active clinical role 3) Demonstration of CME experience in ECT-related areas.
• The treatment site should include separate areas for waiting, treatment, and recovery.
• If outpatient ECT treatment is provided, there should also be space identified for patients
and those accompanying the patient during the post recovery period.
• Policies should identify where ECT related equipment and supplies are stored within the
treatment site.
• Staff responsibilities regarding the treatment site should be included in the policy and
procedure manual.
• Patient medical records should be readily accessible to the ECT treatment team during
treatment.
Since ECT differs from other “typical” operative procedures, hospitals that designate general
operating rooms, surgical suites, and/or common recovery rooms for ECT treatment should
identify any additional equipment that is specific to the delivery of ECT and should be available
during treatment. When such treatment sites are used, providers should delineate any
additional steps that may be needed to assure patient privacy.
The treatment site should contain sufficient quantities of required and optional equipment,
medications and supplies to administer ECT safely. (APA p 118) .
• The treatment area should also contain equipment for intubation, seizure induction (brief
pulse waveform ECT device), physiologic monitoring including EEG, and resuscitation.
• The recovery area should also contain ECG monitoring and pulse oximetry devices. More
specifically, standard equipment in the treatment area includes: 1) stretcher or bed with
8
side rails and the capacity to raise both the head and feet, 2) automatic or manual blood
pressure monitoring device, 3) stethoscope, 4) ECT device with built-in EEG monitoring, 5)
ECG monitoring equipment, 6) sphygmomanometer cuff to permit detection of ictal motor
duration, 7) pulse oximeter, 8) oxygen delivery system, 9) suction apparatus, 10)
intubation set for managing airways, and 11) reflex hammer.
• When treating patients who are at significantly increased risk of musculoskeletal injury
(e.g. severe osteoporosis) or when using nondepolarizing muscle relaxant agents (e.g.
curare, atracurium, mivacurium, rocuronium), it is recommended that a peripheral nerve
stimulator be available to ensure the adequacy of muscle blockade before delivering the
electrical stimulus. A defibrillator should be readily available. Access to a backup ECT
device and additional cables is suggested. Staff responsibilities relating to equipment
should be delineated including its availability in the treatment area, safety checks and
general care and maintenance.
• Medications used during the administration of ECT should be located within the treatment
site. (APA p 118-119, 122-123)
• Pharmacologic agents that may be required during ECT treatment should be identified. Such
medications include: 1) primary anesthetic agent, 2) primary muscle relaxant, 3) an anticholinergic
agent, 4) medications for first-line management of arrhythmias, hyper- or hypotension, and
cardiac arrest, 5) medications for the initial management of severe bronchospasm or anaphylactic
shock, other agents for managing status epilepticus, 6) antinausea medications, and 7) non-
narcotic analgesics.
• Practices should cover storage and staff access to medications within the ECT treatment area.
9
VII. Treatment Procedures (APA p 125-195)
Waveform Characteristics
• A brief pulse stimulus is the standard of care.
• Because of the potential aggravation of cognitive side effects and the lack of evidence of any
therapeutic advantage, the continued use of sine wave stimulation is not justified.
B. Treatment Parameters
Practitioners should have an established treatment protocol for selecting stimulus dosage that is
specific to the patient’s individualized treatment plan.
10
E. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes (APA p 197-202)
Therapeutic Response
• Each treatment plan should indicate specific criteria for meeting patients’ therapeutic goals, whether
that may be clinical improvement and/ or remission. .
Clinical Assessments
• Clinical assessments should be performed by the attending physician or designee and documented prior
to ECT and after every one or two ECT treatments, preferably at least 24 hours after the treatment.
Clinical rating instruments will be routinely utilized to monitor treatment outcomes and identify
changes in symptoms over the ECT course. Standardized scales in use at this time include the
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Global Impressions Scale.
Cognitive Changes
Evaluation of cognitive function will be assessed to identify changes in orientation and memory
through the use of objective evaluation and by subjective report. Assessment should be gathered to
determine baseline functioning and should be repeated at least weekly during the Index course of
treatment, and will include a mini mental status exam.
• When possible, cognitive assessment should be performed at least 24 hours after an ECT
treatment.
• The presence and severity of disorientation, anterograde amnesia, and retrograde amnesia
should be monitored in terms of both objective findings and self-report. This evaluation
should consist of bedside assessment of orientation and memory (both retention of newly
learned material and recall of recent and remote events) and/or administration of formal
neuropsychologic measures. A five point Likert scale will be used by all facilities to evaluate
patients’ subjective self-report of changes in memory.
• If orientation and/or memory deteriorate during an ECT course, modifications to the ECT
procedure should be considered. [*This was where the examples of modifications were to be
relocated, from the current listing under “special populations”] If such effects persist after
completion of the ECT course, a plan should be made for post-ECT follow-up assessment which
will include appropriate referrals to specialists and treatment providers to address memory
changes.
• Any serious medical event occurring during the course of ECT will be reported to the
Department of Mental Health. Serious is defined as an event that can result in death, loss of a
body part, disability, loss of bodily function, or require major intervention for correction (e.g.
higher level of care, surgery) National Quality Forum (2011) Form follows in Attachment A.
11
VIII. Treatment Following Index ECT Course (APA p 201-216)
Prior to each continuation ECT treatment, pre-ECT evaluation will include standards required for Index
course of treatment
Facility Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the facility’s medical director (or medical staff, if no such individual is defined)
to ensure adequate documentation regarding ECT.
13
X. REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association [Weiner, R.D.; Coffey, C.E.; Fochtmann, L.; Greenberg, R.; Isenberg, K.E.;
Moench, L.; and Sackeim, H.A.]. The Practice of ECT: Recommendations for Treatment, Training and
Privileging. Second Edition. Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Press, 2001.
Electroconvulsive Therapy Review Guidelines, State of New York Office of Mental Health, 2012.
14
Attachment A
VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
SIGNIFICANT EVENT DESIGNATED HOSPITAL REPORT
The Department of Mental Health is to be notified of a significant event that occurs in a Designated Hospital. A
verbal report will be made within 24 hours to the DMH Quality Management Coordinator at 802-828-5846.
This completed form must be submitted and faxed to the Department of Mental Health within 24 hours of the
significant event via fax to Sarah Sherbrook at 802-828-3823.
Description of event (identify precipitants, interventions used by staff to attempt to prevent/manage the
event, and description of behaviors observed during the event):
Persons and agencies notified (include when and how notified; if an agency, name of staff to whom report
given)
15