Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology: Review
Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology: Review
Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology: Review
Cellular compartments and organelles organize biological matter. Most well- Highlights
known organelles are separated by a membrane boundary from their surround- Phase separation is known to play a role
in a variety of cellular processes, includ-
ing milieu. There are also many so-called membraneless organelles and recent
ing formation of classical membraneless
studies suggest that these organelles, which are supramolecular assemblies of organelles, signaling complexes, the
proteins and RNA molecules, form via protein phase separation. Recent dis- cytoskeleton, and numerous other
supramolecular assemblies.
coveries have shed light on the molecular properties, formation, regulation, and
function of membraneless organelles. A combination of techniques from cell The concept of phase separation pro-
biology, biophysics, physical chemistry, structural biology, and bioinformatics vides a new framework for our under-
standing of the functional role of
are starting to help establish the molecular principles of an emerging field, thus sequence degeneracy (low-complex-
paving the way for exciting discoveries, including novel therapeutic ity) and protein disorder.
approaches for the treatment of age-related disorders.
Accumulating evidence points to a key
role for phase transitions in human dis-
eases associated with protein aggre-
Introduction gation, and to the misregulation of
Eukaryotic cells are composed of numerous compartments or organelles. These organelles membraneless organelles in disease.
carry out specific functions and provide spatiotemporal control over cellular materials, meta-
Understanding the physical principles
bolic processes, and signaling pathways. For example, the nucleus physically separates and molecular interactions behind pro-
transcription from translation; this has allowed eukaryotes to develop a complex system of tein phase separation could inspire
posttranscriptional control, which is largely absent from prokaryotes [1]. Other examples of novel biomaterials.
membrane-bound organelles include lysosomes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and synaptic
vesicles. However, cells also harbor organelles that lack a delimiting membrane. These are
supramolecular assemblies composed of proteins, nucleic acids, and other molecular com-
1
ponents. They are present in the nucleus (e.g., nucleolus, nuclear speckles), as well as in the Department of Genetics, Stanford
University School of Medicine,
cytoplasm [e.g., stress granules (SGs), processing bodies, the centriole] [2,3]. Many of these
Stanford, CA, USA
cellular bodies were identified decades ago and numerous structural insights became available 2
KU Leuven, Department of
as the bodies were discovered. However, questions have remained about how these bodies Neurosciences, Experimental
Neurology and Leuven Research
form, why they form, and how their physical features contribute to biological function. These
Institute for Neuroscience and
questions are starting to be answered, and recent advances in interdisciplinary approaches Disease (LIND), Leuven, Belgium
3
have fueled the emergence of insights into their organization, molecular properties, and VIB, Center for Brain and Disease
Research, Laboratory of
regulation [2–4]. A growing understanding of the underlying molecular principles and the
Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium
physicochemical forces that drive the formation of membraneless organelles (see Glossary) 4
Max Planck Institute of Molecular
has enabled the elucidation of their diverse functions in a variety of cellular processes, including Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden,
Germany
the stress response, the regulation of gene expression, and the control of signal transduction 5
Department of Molecular
[5–8]. In the past few years, there has been increasing evidence for the involvement of Pharmacology, Physiology, and
membraneless organelles in age-related disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Biotechnology, Brown University,
Providence, RI, USA
(ALS) [9–16]. Together, these discoveries have created a new field in cell biology, focused 6
Department of Structural Biology, St.
on understanding how organization of cellular matter into membraneless organelles contributes Jude Children’s Research Hospital,
to function, and how their dysregulation leads to disease. Memphis, TN, USA
420 Trends in Cell Biology, June 2018, Vol. 28, No. 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.004
© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
7
In this review, we examine the current state of the growing interest in membraneless organelles, Institute of Molecular Life Sciences,
University of Zürich, Zürich,
providing insights into their biogenesis, organization, dynamics, regulation, and function. We Switzerland
also discuss how recent findings can give us molecular insights in age-related diseases. This 8
Switch Laboratory, VIB, Leuven,
could pave the way for developing novel therapeutic strategies that leverage our understanding Belgium
9
KU Leuven, Department for Cellular
of phase separation. Finally, we highlight the major challenges that lie ahead and questions and Molecular Medicine, Leuven,
that need to be answered quantitatively and completely in the coming years. Belgium
10
Department of Biochemistry and
Biophysics, Perelman School of
Membraneless Organelles Are Formed via Phase Separation Medicine at the University of
Many membraneless cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments (e.g., P bodies, SGs, the Balbiani Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
11
body, germ granules, PML bodies, Cajal Bodies, nuclear speckles, and the nucleolus) have Department of Pharmacology,
Boston University School of Medicine,
been studied for a long time. However, the forces driving their formation mostly remained Boston, MA, USA
12
enigmatic. Several early studies highlighted the dynamic nature of these assemblies [17–19]. In Department of Neurology, Boston
2005 it was argued that Cajal bodies behave as ‘semifluid spheres suspended in semifluid University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA, USA
nucleoplasm’ [17]. However, definitive experimental evidence for the physical nature of these 13
VIB, Center for Structural Biology
assemblies was lacking. This changed in 2009, when Brangwynne, Jülicher, and Hyman (CSB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB),
showed that P granules (RNA and protein-containing bodies in embryos of Caenorhabditis Brussels, Belgium
14
Institute of Enzymology, Research
elegans) have liquid-like properties and form by phase separation [20]. This is a physical Centre for Natural Sciences of the
process that occurs when a supersaturated solution of components spontaneously separates Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
into two phases, a dense phase and a dilute phase, that then stably coexist. The proposed Budapest, Hungary
15
MTA-DE Laboratory of Protein
liquid-like nature of P granules was evident from their round appearance (the result of Dynamics, Department of
minimizing surface tension), deformability (fusion and fission events), and dynamic exchange Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
of components. Similar observations were made 2 years later for nucleoli [21]. The liquids University of Debrecen, Debrecen,
Hungary
themselves are not ‘simple liquids’, which is a term that has specific connotations. A ‘simple
liquid’, also known as a van der Waals fluid, comprises of spherical particles that interact via
isotropic short-range potentials. Protein and RNA liquids are not spherical particles of uniform *Correspondence:
stickiness. Instead, they are best described as associative polymers and the liquids formed by [email protected]
(S. Boeynaems),
such systems have distinctive structures that are defined by physical crosslinks that give rise to [email protected]
a panoply of material properties, including the possibility of spatially organized droplets where (L. Van Den Bosch),
one polymer wets another [17,22–27]. [email protected] (P. Tompa),
and
[email protected] (M. Fuxreiter).
Phase separation is a well-known phenomenon in polymer chemistry [28]. However, its
application to biomacromolecules is a much more recent development. Some proteins, such
as hemoglobin, had previously been reported to undergo phase separation at high concen-
tration in vitro [29,30], but the significance of these observations remained unclear. Especially
among crystallographers, liquid–liquid phase separation is frequently observed during crystal-
lization trials [31]. Liquid droplet formation lowers the free energy of nucleation and thus is often
a desired phenomenon in crystallization experiments [32]. However, the realization that phase
separation might be the operational principle governing the formation of membraneless
organelles to regulate biological functions and activities has emerged only recently. Strong
support for this idea was provided by Rosen and colleagues in 2012. They showed that protein-
and RNA-containing bodies could be reconstituted from purified components; they further
provided evidence that these reconstituted liquid bodies can promote the nucleation of actin
polymers [6]. In the years following these seminal discoveries, there has been growing
appreciation that proteins and other macromolecules, such as RNAs, can form condensates
that are either well-mixed or spatially organized, and switch between different material states
[14,16,33]. Membraneless organelles are known more generally as biomolecular condensates,
and the constituent biomolecules obey the same physical principles as other polymers (Box 1).
Accumulating data underscores the variety of different phase transitions and the complex
molecular and physical interactions behind these processes.
Pericentriolar
Centrioles
Core Granular material
Figure 1. Different Characteristics of Protein Phase Transitions. (A) Material state and dynamics can vary in a wide
range from liquid-like to solid states. (B) Example of the protein FUS, which can span the entire range of material states in
vitro. Pictures adapted from reference [16]. (C) Examples of membraneless organelles and their reconstituted in vitro
counterparts. Pictures adapted from references [48,66,72,87,142] (D) Several membraneless organelles have complex
topologies with different subcompartments that may belong to different states. All scale bars 5 mm unless indicated.
Multivalent proteins belong to a class of polymers known as associative polymers, in that they can undergo gelation
aided by phase separation or gelation without phase separation. Here, valence refers to the effective numbers of
adhesive domains/motifs that provide specificity in intra- as well intermolecular interactions. Recent computer simula-
tions and adaptations of the theories of associative polymers show that multivalent proteins may be parsed into
associative domains/motifs, so-called stickers, interspersed by spacers [78]. The stickers enable physical crosslinking,
whereas the spacers or linkers determine whether or not gelation will be driven by phase separation. Linkers or spacers
that are preferentially solvated will inhibit phase separation, whereas linkers/spacers that prefer self-associations or are
indifferent about whether they interact with themselves or solvent, will enable gelation via phase separation. The key
result emerging from theory, simulations, and recent experiments [87] is a clear role for intrinsically disordered regions as
determinants of the nature of phase transitions, as well as the densities and organization of protein modules within
droplets.
spontaneous liquid–liquid demixing upon interacting with their specific targets [6]. These data
suggest that so-called ‘fuzzy’ interaction modes might enable a multitude of combinations
amongst multivalent interaction domains and that this could be a general driver of protein phase
transitions [44] (Box 3).
In addition to serving as merely linkers, IDRs may also mediate ‘sticky’ interactions to promote
phase transition [45]. McKnight and coworkers found that concentrated solutions of different
IDRs could, over time, spontaneously form hydrogels [39], similar to existing observations
made regarding FG-repeat-containing nuclear pore proteins [46]. Shortly thereafter, Taylor and
coworkers discovered disease mutations in the IDRs of hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2B1 that
resulted in accelerated assembly into higher-order structures in vitro. Furthermore, these
mutants promoted the spontaneous formation of SGs with dramatically reduced dynamics
in living cells [33]. Subsequent work from several groups showed that the proteins containing
How exactly are multivalent interactions encoded in IDRs? These sequences are often enriched
in uncharged polar side chains (glutamine, asparagine, glycine, serine, proline), charged amino
acids (arginine, lysine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid), or aromatic residues (phenylalanine and
tyrosine). Interestingly, these residues do not seem to be distributed randomly throughout the
sequence, but are often found as short linear interaction motifs (SLiMs), alternating charge
blocks, or degenerate repeats [50,51]. The range of sequence biases associated with IDRs that
mediate phase separation indicates that there may be a range of underlying driving forces.
These likely include electrostatic, dipole–dipole, pi–pi, cation–pi, hydrophobic, and hydrogen
bonding interactions [9,49,50,52–56] (Figure 2A,B). Indeed, mutational studies have demon-
strated that phase separation of different LCDs can be prevented by interfering with a variety of
residue types [9,10,14,16,57]. Additionally, disrupting alternating charge blocks [49,53] and
mutating key residues in degenerate repeats [39,46] can also perturb phase separation.
Membraneless organelles frequently contain nucleic acids, especially RNA. Moreover, the
proteins associated with membraneless organelles often possess RNA-binding domains or
motifs [9,23] and RNA promotes phase separation of various RBPs [9,10,14,16,58–60]
(Figure 2C). Interestingly, high RNA/protein stoichiometries can inhibit phase separation as
well [10,61]. RNA also regulates the nucleation and spatiotemporal distribution of membrane-
less organelles [62,63]. Even G-bodies, which are composed of proteins involved in glucose
metabolism, require RNA for biogenesis [64]. RNA can also affect the material properties of
protein droplets [48,60]. Interestingly, repetitive RNA species have recently been found to
phase separate through intermolecular base-pairing interactions, once more highlighting the
universality of multivalency and structural polymorphisms as drivers of phase separation [65].
β–zipper
Dipole–dipole
Mof-binding domain
Caon–pi
RNA base-pairing Pi–pi
Coiled coil
(B)
(C)
Aging, mutaons, proteostasis defects
pH changes, osmolarity changes, cellular stress
Concentraon
Hydrotropes, chaperones
RNA
Subcellular
Localizaon PTMs
Figure 2. Interactions and Regulatory Mechanisms Implicated in Protein Phase Separation. (A) Overview of
different kinds of contacts, which have been observed in protein phase separation. (B) Examples of phase separating
proteins illustrate the importance of multivalency, highlighted by an array of interaction modules within a single protein. (C)
Different mechanisms regulate the material state and nucleation of protein phase separation.
are dynamic assemblies, these aggregates may have a fibrillar architecture [73,74]. FUS and
hnRNPA1 are examples of such SG proteins, with long, low-complexity IDRs that are mutated
in ALS patients [75,33]. Initial studies from McKnight and coworkers found that these disor-
dered domains can form reversible hydrogels, and this is dependent on labile kinked b sheets
[39,76]. Interestingly, repeated cycles of gelling/dissolution of hydrogels promoted a transition
Besides physical properties, specificity of granule assembly may derive from the specificity of
direct protein–protein interactions. IDPs and proteins undergoing phase separation are
enriched in SLiMs and degenerate repeats, which can serve as primary protein-binding
modules [51] (Figure 2A,B). Specificity may be related to additional features of IDPs, such
as the number and spacing of repetitive binding motifs (multivalency), their post-translational
modifications (PTMs), or the dynamics of the intervening linkers [44,78]. Nonspecific electro-
static interactions, especially with RNA, could be critical to nucleate droplet assembly, and
different IDRs respond differently to changing ionic strength [10,49]. Although SLiMs possess
some degree of specificity, the multiplicative effects of multiple SLiMs may determine the
material properties and composition of a given assembly.
It has also become clear that there is a clear distinction between structural components of
membraneless organelles and client proteins, which only target the compartment [36,66].
However, the exact molecular characteristics discriminating between these behaviors currently
remain unknown. Preference of client proteins for certain assemblies could simply be mediated
by the physical restrictions introduced by the constituent components of the compartment. The
array of interactions in a protein droplet/gel creates a network with a specific mesh size. This
mesh size could act as a diffusion barrier by allowing free diffusion of small molecules below the
mesh size through the network, while limiting the entry of larger ones [49,86,87]. Additionally,
membraneless organelles could be anchored in space, hereby preventing diffusion and fusion
events. Aggresomes, for example, are perinuclear misfolded protein deposits kept in place by a
cytoskeletal cage, which prevents their diffusion through the cell [88].
Spatiotemporal Regulation
Given the rapidly expanding range of proteins that are being shown to undergo spontaneous
phase separate in the test tube, it remains puzzling how cells can exercise precise control over
this process. For example, several RBPs appear fully soluble at cellular concentrations well
above their in vitro saturation concentration [14,16], yet their transition to a different phase only
occurs under specific conditions. Put simply, how is the cell able to avoid spontaneous and
uncontrollable phase separation? This question is closely related to the above-mentioned ideas
surrounding the origins of specificity of phase transitions.
Work from different labs has shown that both serine and tyrosine phosphorylation can control
phase separation [12,52,89,90], and the same holds true for arginine methylation [49,91] and
sumoylation [80]. Importantly, the activity of the dual specificity kinase DYRK3, which partitions
into SG, was shown to be necessary for SG dissolution [92], suggesting that there might be
specific cellular switches controlling these processes. Interestingly, proteins prone to phase
separation, seem to be enriched in residues that are targeted by PTMs [38]. Indeed, PTMs can
dramatically alter the charge or other properties of these IDRs/LCDs, hence, modifying the
sequence-intrinsic driving forces to phase separate [49,52] (Figure 2C).
Another way for the cell to control phase transitions is by controlling the cellular concentrations
and intracellular distribution (i.e., diffusivities of proteins that mediate phase separation)
(Figure 2C). The cellular concentrations of hnRNPA1 are higher than the in vitro saturation
concentration, yet these molecules remain soluble in the nucleus for reasons that remain
unclear [14]. Blocking nuclear import of hnRNPA1, which leads to its accumulation in the
cytoplasm, leads to the spontaneous formation of SGs [14]. Interestingly, nuclear transport
factors are themselves components of SGs, suggesting that nucleocytoplasmic transport
processes might control phase separation in multiple, albeit unknown ways [69].
Disease mutations might also affect phase separation through the generation of aberrant
protein and RNA species. Repeat expansion disorders prove especially interesting in this
regard. Several of these disorders involve the formation of repeat RNA foci, which trap RBPs,
resulting in their loss of function [95]. Interestingly, such repeat RNAs can themselves phase
separate through multivalent base pairing, mimicking the foci observed in patients [65].
Additionally, several of these expanded repeat RNAs have been found to be translated,
generating peptide repeats [96]. Translation of ALS-causing GGGGCC repeat expansions,
for example, produces different dipeptide repeats [97–99]. Two of them, namely glycine–
arginine and proline–arginine dipeptide repeats, localize to different membraneless organelles,
including SGs [9,12,13,57,100]. SGs positive for these pathogenic peptides were less
dynamic, and moreover, recruited aggregation-prone proteins such as TDP-43 [9,13].
SGsrequireautophagyforclearance[101].Interestingly,mutationsinautophagygenesarethecause
of various diseases, including ALS [102] and the efficacy of autophagy is also known to decrease with
age [103]. Besides autophagy, chaperones are also involved in both maintaining SG fluidity and their
clearance [104,105]. These observations suggest that the inability of the cell to tightly control these
assemblies may lead to pathological aggregation. Nuclear transport is also known to deteriorate with
aging [106] and is being increasingly implicated in protein aggregation diseases [69,107–112].
Given the importance of PTMs in the regulation of phase separation, it is interesting to note that
several pathological protein aggregates show specific PTM signatures. For example, Tau phos-
phorylation is a hallmark of pathology in Alzheimer’s disease [115], and interestingly, tau phos-
phorylation promotes aggregation and phase separation in vitro [116].
SGs have also been implicated in the antiviral stress response [128] and viruses have evolved
numerous ways of interfering with SG assembly. Moreover, some viruses, such as flaviviruses,
including Zika, even hijack SG proteins to aid in their replication [128,129]. Although still in its
infancy, we would argue that since protein aggregation and phase separation are implicated in
numerous human pathological conditions, a better understanding of these processes will help
us develop novel therapeutic strategies in the wider field of human medicine.
compiled a list of, in our opinion, the key outstanding questions that remain unanswered (see
A predictive framework on how specific-
Outstanding Questions). Addressing these questions will be of pivotal importance for gaining ity of membraneless organelle composi-
tion is generated is currently completely
lacking. Which principles target proteins
Box 4. What Is the Function of Membraneless Organelles? and RNAs to specific phases and what
prevents the coalescence of distinct
Numerous proteins have seemingly evolved the ability to drive the formation of or be recruited to membraneless
membraneless organelles?
organelles. Yet why do cells need such compartments? What is their biochemical function? Surprisingly, these
questions remain largely unanswered.
While progress is being made in deter-
mining the internal structure of test
Compartmentalization in different forms and scales is widely used by organisms. Our stomach is a well-defined organ,
tube granules, we mostly lack the tools
which serves one main purpose (i.e., digesting food through acid hydrolysis). Obviously, such a chemical reaction is best
to pursue this question in living cells.
carried out if the body has a means to concentrate both food and the acid into one singular compartment. Additionally,
How can we investigate the internal
this compartmentalization protects other organs from exposure to acid. Similarly, our cells have evolved a strikingly
organization of membraneless organ-
similar mechanism. Lysosomes create an acidic compartment to degrade cellular waste. Through their membrane-
elles in living systems?
barrier lysosomes can both concentrate the reaction components and at the same time protect the rest of the cell from
its harmful effects. Another example of organ–organelle parallels includes fat tissue and lipid droplets, which store
energy under the form of lipids for later use. Additionally, bodies and cells can amplify signals from the environment by What are the differences between
compartmentalizing signal reception: our eyes focus incoming light onto our retina, which concentrates the light physiological and pathological assem-
receptors. On the subcellular level, neurons also concentrate their receptors in distinct substructures, namely the blies? Which factors drive this conver-
synapses. sion in disease?
From these analogies four main functions arise for compartmentalization, being: (i) concentration of (bio)chemical How do disease mutations and aging
reactions, (ii) sequestering harmful components, (iii) storage of biomolecules, and (iv) signal amplification. Interestingly, specifically affect phase separation of
all these functions exist in the realm of membraneless organelles. First, concentration of cytoskeleton components membraneless organelle compo-
through phase separation promotes their nucleation into filaments [66,147], and similarly, splicing is controlled by nents? What are the associated
multivalent assembly of splicing factors on mRNA [148]. Second, although protein aggregates in disease are considered molecular events?
harmful, accumulating evidence suggests that they could be an initial rescue mechanism of the cell to sequester the
more toxic protein oligomers [149,150]. Third, numerous assemblies function as storage granules, as they sequester Why do diseases associated with pro-
proteins and other biomolecules under times of stress or quiescence for later reuse [64,151]. Fourth, by concentrating tein aggregation display such pro-
receptors and signaling molecules, a cell can amplify certain signaling pathways. In light of this, different membrane found cell type specificity? What
receptors achieve exactly this through protein phase separation [6,8]. makes (specific) neurons especially
sensitive to perturbations in
Although we have not fully unraveled the complex function of phase separation in the cell, these examples give us a proteostasis?
glimpse into why cells could clearly benefit from the formation of membraneless organelles.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript is based on discussions held at the Phase Transitions in Biology and Disease meeting held in Leuven, May
2nd–3th, 2017, and the seminal discoveries of Dr Anthony A. Hyman, Dr Michael K. Rosen, and others. The authors would
like to thank Dr Roy Parker, Dr J. Paul Taylor, Dr Clifford Brangwynne, and Dr Steve McKnight for helpful discussions during
the preparation of this manuscript. The authors would like to thank Dr Alex Holehouse and Dr Rohit V. Pappu for
contributing text and providing helpful comments. The two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for their
thorough review and critique of the manuscript. M.F. acknowledges financial support of GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00044,
and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. S.B and L.V.D.B are supported by KU Leuven (‘Opening the future’ and C1), the
Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), the ‘Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in
Flanders’ (IWT-Vlaanderen) and the ALS Liga (Belgium). S.B. acknowledges a long-term fellowship from EMBO. P.T. is
supported by Odysseus grant G.0029.12 from FWO-Vlaanderen. J.S. is supported by a grant from the European
Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme ERC Grant agreement 647458
(MANGO). N.L.F. acknowledges support by NIGMS R01GM118530.
References
1. Glisovic, T. et al. (2008) RNA-binding proteins and post-tran- 15. Murakami, T. et al. (2015) ALS/FTD mutation-induced phase
scriptional gene regulation. FEBS Lett. 582, 1977–1986 transition of FUS liquid droplets and reversible hydrogels into
2. Mitrea, D.M. and Kriwacki, R.W. (2016) Phase separation in irreversible hydrogels impairs RNP granule function. Neuron 88,
biology; functional organization of a higher order. Cell Commun. 678–690
Signal. 14, 1 16. Patel, A. et al. (2015) A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS
3. Uversky, V.N. (2017) Intrinsically disordered proteins in over- protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162,
crowded milieu: membrane-less organelles, phase separation, 1066–1077
and intrinsic disorder. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 18–30 17. Handwerger, K.E. et al. (2005) Cajal bodies, nucleoli, and speck-
4. Hyman, A.A. et al. (2014) Liquid-liquid phase separation in les in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus have a low-density, sponge-
biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39–58 like structure. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 202–211
5. Boulay, G. et al. (2017) Cancer-specific retargeting of BAF 18. Kedersha, N. et al. (2000) Dynamic shuttling of TIA-1 accom-
complexes by a prion-like domain. Cell 171, 163–178 panies the recruitment of mRNA to mammalian stress granules.
J. Cell Biol. 151, 1257–1268
6. Li, P. et al. (2012) Phase transitions in the assembly of multiva-
lent signalling proteins. Nature 483, 336–340 19. Andrei, M.A. et al. (2005) A role for eIF4E and eIF4E-transporter
in targeting mRNPs to mammalian processing bodies. RNA 11,
7. Wheeler, J.R. et al. (2016) Distinct stages in stress granule
717–727
assembly and disassembly. Elife 5, e18413
20. Brangwynne, C.P. et al. (2009) Germline P granules are liquid
8. Su, X. et al. (2016) Phase separation of signaling molecules
droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation.
promotes T cell receptor signal transduction. Science 352,
Science 324, 1729–1732
595–599
21. Brangwynne, C.P. et al. (2011) Active liquid-like behavior of
9. Boeynaems, S. et al. (2017) Phase separation of C9orf72 dipep-
nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis
tide repeats perturbs stress granule dynamics. Mol. Cell 65,
oocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 4334–4339
1044–1055
22. Trcek, T. et al. (2015) Drosophila germ granules are structured
10. Burke, K.A. et al. (2015) Residue-by-residue view of in vitro FUS
and contain homotypic mRNA clusters. Nat. Commun. 6, 7962
granules that bind the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell 60, 231–241 23. Jain, S. et al. (2016) ATPase-modulated stress granules contain
a diverse proteome and substructure. Cell 164, 487–498
11. Conicella, A.E. et al. (2016) ALS mutations disrupt phase sepa-
ration mediated by alpha-helical structure in the TDP-43 low- 24. Feric, M. et al. (2016) Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar
complexity C-terminal domain. Structure 24, 1537–1549 subcompartments. Cell 165, 1686–1697
12. Kwon, I. et al. (2014) Poly-dipeptides encoded by the C9orf72 25. Fei, J. et al. (2017) Quantitative analysis of multilayer organiza-
repeats bind nucleoli, impede RNA biogenesis, and kill cells. tion of proteins and RNA in nuclear speckles at super resolution.
Science 345, 1139–1145 J. Cell Sci. 130, 4180–4192
13. Lee, K.H. et al. (2016) C9orf72 dipeptide repeats impair the 26. Wang, J.T. et al. (2014) Regulation of RNA granule dynamics by
assembly, dynamics, and function of membrane-less organ- phosphorylation of serine-rich, intrinsically disordered proteins in
elles. Cell 167, 774–788 C. elegans. Elife 3, e04591
14. Molliex, A. et al. (2015) Phase separation by low complexity 27. Pitt, J.N. et al. (2000) P granules in the germ cells of Caeno-
domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives patho- rhabditis elegans adults are associated with clusters of nuclear
logical fibrillization. Cell 163, 123–133 pores and contain RNA. Dev. Biol. 219, 315–333